Datasets:

Intuit-GenSRF

/

combined_toxicity_profanity_v2_eval_only

like 0

In addition, the article is an attack page. ''''''

.]] , the capital city of Transnistria, as seen from the Dniester river

"NN, POV Material is not notable, and appears to be a POV push against the subject, the band Insane Clown Posse. Structural bias in article title, ""Gay ICP"", as well. Delete, of course; I am the nominator. Comment on further inquiry, article Gay ICP seems to be the worst creation of Huh?, Hasn't Kasreyn vandalized the main ICP page?. Why is this here?. Any claims on sexual preferences of the band belong on the band article (ICP), but Kasreyn has edited this addition and many others out, because it didn't coincide with his POV. Keep it per nom. Keep it as above. (| UlTiMuS ( | T | C | E ) Comment I'm seeing very strong support here; does anyone agree this is a case for a speedy delete? What? Been hearing voices, Kasreyn? Aside from your numerous comments Kasreyn, I don't see much support of your POV. Comment I wouldn't speedy delete this article. I disagee that this material is ""unreliable""I think it is notable, and not designed to bias the subject any more than it would be to say that Charles Nelson Reilly is gay. That said, I do believe that the structural bias in the article title is unacceptable, so this article should probably be deleted, but its content merged with the main article. I think it's a biased attempt by fans of ICP to keep this information out of the main article, and that the creator of this article was taking a valid stand by creating it if ICP fans are putting their own POV in the article. Comment I'm not sure on what grounds you can propose to delete this article, or a remove it from the main ICP article. Comment It is that noteworthy and verified. The text makes a reference to an interview in a magazine. I have found the source of the material. The article lists four references which are quite relevant information and are only there to make the article more substantial. Personally, I am not a fan of the group or their style of music and do not care if the statements are true or false. I am just trying to preserve the integrity of the article. If you can show me one valid reason for dele

tion, then I would consider supporting removing this from wiki. Save it I personally verified these sources, and they all exceed expectations. Riviting stuff people. >Riddlebox Wraithz Hold on per all the lovely comments above. I don't think it's speedyible under wikipedian legislation at all. Northenglish Interesting It's interesting, and more than just POV since it's verifiably true. It might be worth briefly mentioning it in the main ICP article as well. Agreed per nom. "

Again Pan-Turkistic vandalism Sorry to bother you again, but User:E104421 - a Turkish nationalist who also vandalized the article Hephthalites - is not messing up the articles Babur, Mughal Empire, Khwarezmian Empire, and Seljuqs. You help is needed.

I'm back Hi there. Well I am back, and I had the best time. I'm paying for it now, as I'm exhausted, but a couple of good nights' sleep should fix the problem, and then it's back to the old grindstone for me. You asked for a rock, so I brought one, and not just any old rock either. Hope you like it. We went there one day. Personally, I think I took a better photo of it, (In fact I took about 50, from every possible angle) but I haven't uploaded anything, and it was cloudy when we went, so this one at least has a nice blue sky. Thanks for keeping an eye on some articles. I see Sharon Tate is up for discussion. I think another good example is Anne Frank. If Anne had lived, her diary may never have even been published, and had it been published it may have failed to attract the audience that it is has. Her notability is unquestionably linked not only to her death, but the reaction to it. I don't attempt to put Sharon in the same category, but the principal is the same. If she had lived, her acting career may have fizzled to nothing, but she didn't live, and that's the whole point. To reduce either of them to a straightforward bio that ends with their deaths, would be failing to adequately assess either of them.

Note also the problems of History of Turkey vs. History of Anatolia (similar to History of Pakistan vs. History of India)

As such he even takes precedence before the entire cabinet except the Chancellor.

" First off, I can let you know that I am not on any particular side. However, from what I've seen, you have displayed childish behaviour in the last few days. I know that the situation was a bit frustrating, but it could have been handled with much more patience and maturity. It is bad manners— and against policy— to impersonate another user. Do not do it , . There is no excuse for it. I do not know the correct info for the article. However, what I do know is that all this can be finalised if you or the other party found sources to support the claims. Also, Wikipedia has a policy against reverting the article between different versions — the 3RR. Before you edit Firebender again, I suggest that you read it. Also, from now on, I suggest that you behave more calmly and with more maturity. It's always better to talk out the situation with the other person instead of trying to annoy him. Please be civil. (talk • cont.) "

"__NOEDITSECTION__ __NOTOC__ < Archive 23 Archive 24 Archive 25 > United Wrestling Association Thank you very much for your time & effort cleaning up United Wrestling Association. It looks wonderful now. I appreciate that very much. Triple Crown and Grand Slam Champions I am not and was never looking to start trouble, all I am trying to do is expand a definition based on fact and references. The Triple Crown and the Grand Slam are what we have been going back and forth on. My contention is that The Intercontinental and United States Championships are equal and thus are interchangeable when when deciding a Crown/Slam. You say no because WWE never explicitly came out and said so. On 8-4-06, JBL said he was a Slam winner. A WWE wrestler on WWE TV said he accomplished a WWE sanctioned feat. It was said that no outside source has verified this, but no one in WWE has disputed JBL's claim either. Also it must be pointed out that PWI has always considered the two championships as equal. When PWI used to do their rankings for WWF and WCW, the I-C and U.S. Titles were always listed as automatic number one contenders for their respective World Champions. The same holds true today when they do the rankings for Raw (I-C) and Smackdown (U.S.). PWI is considered the main source for what is considered a ""World Title"" and their word is law here on Wikipedia. They also have always maintained that the I-C and U.S. Championships are of equal value and of equal standing. As I have said before, I am not trying to vandalize or add nonsense to Wikipedia, only enhance it with an updated definition based on consensus and fact, based on logic and references. JBL, PWI, and many other wiki users have backed up this definition. (Look at the Triple Crown Champion Discussion page). All I ask is my contribution be allowed to stand as I respectfully feel that I am in the right on this one. Thank you for your time. Vlh. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by (talk • contribs) . Re Sprotected3 The merge idea sounds good. Thanks (Reply

) It works fine. Thanks again. '''(Reply)''' per cscwem Hi, Moe. I'm particularly sensitive about people asking me about the reasons for my votes. So I won't be offended if you are, or decline to answer (heck, I walk that line frequently). It is my hope, though, that our past history will put aside the notion that I'm grilling you over the coals. I found your vote opposing CSCWEM today. I was wondering if you could explain to me what I've missed. I personally voted against him for administratorship, on the basis that he simply did not need it to continue the work he was doing. He still doesn't. And frankly, I oppose most RFAs. In this case, though, I've interacted with him a lot and find him to be (I hate to use the term) a real ""standup kind of guy."" If you'd deign to explain to me, I'd be most grateful. Thanks, Alex. ... aa:talk You know, I mostly agree with everything you've said. I think the one perception difference we have is that I see him interacting with a lot of users in the process of all those revert edits. But, your point is valid. Thanks for letting me know. ... aa:talk 22:19

super discussion, respect -

someone can tell me what is the difference between anglo-concertina and bandonion. both are bisonoric...

I do have an account, but I do not want my IP filled with these messages either. Please either remove them or add warnings to theirs, since they did EXACTLY the same thing.

I have many contents on my watch list. So you better watch out.

I got interrupted a few times, so something less than 20 minutes. No tools, just FireFox with multiple tabs, a text editor to accumulate items by Alt-Tabbing back and forth, and WP:POPUPS to verify the vandalism by mere hovering. —EncMstr (talk)

" I was right going to report this guy to WP:UAA. The username is meant to threaten someone. (talk) "

Username change Hi Essjay - yes, I would still like to.

" Please stop your disruptive editing. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. talk "

|listas = John Casimir, Count Palatine Of Kleeburg

DanielRigal BITCH YOU ARE A FUCKING GEEK ASS PUSSY U AIT SHIT U AINT EVER GONNA BE SHIT GET A FUCKIN LIFE U BITCH ASS HOMO GO AHEAD DELETE ME BITCH AND UR WORK SUCKS.

" I like messing around with your talk page. Can I do it every day? — Nearly Headless Nick {C} {L} "

- Usain Bolt 200 metres

"== A welcome from == Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; I hope you like the place and decide to stay. We're glad to have you in our community! Here are a few good links for newcomers: If you haven't already, drop by the New user log and tell others a bit about yourself. Always sign your posts on talk pages! That way, others will know who left which comments. The Five Pillars of Wikipedia Simplified Ruleset How to edit a page Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial Picture tutorial How to write a great article Naming conventions Manual of Style Wikipedia Glossary I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Though we all make goofy mistakes, here is what Wikipedia is not. If you have any questions or concerns, don't hesitate to see the help pages or add a question to the village pump. The Community Portal can also be very useful. Happy editing! P.S. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you need help with anything or simply wish to say hello. ) T of Puppets "

I've made a few changes so hopefully it is okay now.  (talk • contribs • email)

Hi EdJohnston. I found them. Thank you for noticing my request and making such a friendly offer.

10:49, 11 Sep 2004 (UTC)

I created this article to serve as an extended,more informative version of a table in the Supercentenarian article that was in age order.'ALPHABETIZATION MASSIVELY REDUCES THE USEFULNESS OF THE INFORMATION.' The casual alterations that have piled up in the non-alphabetized fork of this article also detract from its content.That a consensus are clueless doesn't mean the article should have to put up with the flaws of that fork.If you don't like my efficient spacing,then let the

I am a huge tool bag.

Saddhiyama, Wikipedia articles do not condemn, or judge, the subjects. Have a look at the articles on Hitler, or Stalin, or Mussolini. I will continue to delete the text in question. If you really think that is vandalism, then you know the avanues to explore, I suppose, but I feel you will be disappointed. Ah well.

" des contradictions de Wikipédia qui encourage les modifications mais insulte ceux qui modifient... I don't understand why you block me. I don't understand what is ""trolling"". If you don't want I ask a question, securize your site because it's very very easy to edit this site. I think it's a security problem because everybody can edit and change the text. If I can change the text, I change the text. Why not?"

" Saying ""don't be snitty"" is not a personal attack. It is a defense from YOUR personal attack against me. Now me telling you that you are a pussy and need to grow some balls, now that is a personal attack. I hope you enjoy it as much I did. - "

What is this, an Old Boys Club? Listen, you are employing some serious double standards. I get harasse4d by an Admin, you do nothing. I shout back, and you block me. Well, you can keep on blocking me, because as long as I'm provoked, I'll hit back, and I will not stop until this pestering annoyance backs off.

January 2008 (UTC) As with the Gordon Lightfoot explanation below, this is considered replacable in the article on Jacob. Stills from movies are generally OK for use in articles about the movie or the character, but not in an article about the living actor. For example, note the truly horrible pic we are using for Kristin Scott Thomas and the complete lack of a pic for Naveen Andrews. Andrews' character in Lost, though, has a decent pic. 15:53, 16

" Sorry to disagree again, but the article in question clearly puts the story forth as what each side says. (Narconon says drugs can be sweated out, doctors say no, etc.) How Dr. Touretzky took the story is not actually relevant, more on that at the end. There are four basic ""sides"" depicted in it, on one side Narconon and Scientology on the opposite Science and Ex-members/critics. The stuff on Touretzky's site is supported by the latter, and disputed by the former. To a neutral observer, like the Chronicle, it's a subject of controversy. (That's what ChrisO was saying.) To explain why Dr. Touretzky's opinion of the story is irrelevant, I'll compare it to a reverse hypothetical situation; lets say Narconon felt that they had been quoted out of context. Both arguments are equally invalid since a paper isn't expected to publish what the subject wants published. (Actually, it's really similar to the lawsuit Barbara Schwarz filed against the Salt Lake City Tribune when they published her story and interview.) On POV expressed in this and related articles on Wikipedia Incidentally, this article is an excellent example of the best case scenario of POV in a CoS/Hubbard article. It presents both sides arguments without additional comment by the paper, but unlike the Narconon/CoS claims, proof exists to back the assertions made by science. For example *Narco/tology's belief that all drugs have long longevity in fat, scrambling of 3D pictures, etc. compared to tests on human fat showing otherwise and the 3D picture theory to be unproven. *Narconon and Scientology are for the purposes of the US Government separate entities and this abbreviation is not meant to imply otherwise. They do however share similar vocabulary and ideas, and when describing these I have chosen to abbreviate. "

Welcome! Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Help pages Tutorial How to write a great article Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!  Your edits to Homeowners association I have just reverted your edits to this article, as they appeared to be uniformly negative and were completely unsourced, making some substantial claims that were unsupported by reliable sources. Please read through the links in the welcome message above; they will give you a good starting point in learning the guidelines that WIkipedia operates under. One of the key points is neutral point of view; all articles must be written in a manner that provides a neutral point of view. All additions must also be backed up by reliable sources, and verifiable. If you have issues with the article above, please go to the discussion page and bring them up there before adding unsourced information. Thanks. (arf!) review?

you think im stupid or smth? quit using this ip for vandalism or we'll be both blocked.

" Not done: This is not supported by reliable sources. YO "

Fuc You! FY! S.HIT

Reply sent to your email.

" If you seriously think that ""described by the UK press as being best known for starring"" somehow encapsulates more information, engages more readers, and is more aesthetically pleasing than simply ""starred"", then you are spectacularly, utterly, ineptly clueless. 190.46.98.195 "

You're cool You seem like a really cool guy... *bursts out laughing at sarcasm*.

The photo depicts a plaque that isn't your original work, so it can't be released as a free image.

You're right it's 3rr No difference, you continued it.

" COI WARNING "" 'Astrosociobiology' on Wikipedia A number of months ago I created the astrosociobiology entry in Wikipedia. It's been fascinating watching my original entry become progressively refined and elaborated upon. I made a number of changes to it recently myself, so check it out and feel free to contribute."" '''''' "

A little clique controls the Technocracy articles to very very bad effect The same group of scum bag tandem editors that have controlled and now want to misrepresent any and all articles connected with Technocracy issues ... even to the point of trying to delete the article now. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Johnfos#The_Signpost:_17_October_2011 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Epipelagic http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Beagel http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Lawrencekhoo Mostly they collude to give bad information. TAB The same group of tandem editors from several years ago still try and control this article. They want to eliminate an article about one of the major social movements ... the group that started it. Wikipedia is known for special interest control and buddy editing. Its a pity and the reason a serious article on an important American group is being tried to be done away with by tandem editors that obviously object for some reason to the content. The past clearly shows the same team of tandem editors here. Beagle and Johnphos are tandem editors as is Lawrencekhoo and Epipelagic... One of the most significant groups in American history and they want to get rid of the article. Its pathetic and shows the weakness of en. Wikipedia. Lawrencekhoo is a mainstream economist who ax grinds economic articles Google his name for his economic 'beliefs' Gino

" CTJ i am going to travel so i may not connect fo a day or two, also congrats for the futurama. the rookie "

What was the paper called before 1998? We could put the first editor in the history section and a link in a footnote or at the bottom in the links section to the list of editors. I am fine with those. What do you think?

Hello Hi there! Plz check my talkpage. Many thanks in advance,

" Collins Catholicism is related to his notability. The British have always had Anti-Catholic policies. They have them in place even today. The War for Independence was about getting the British out of Ireland and not only regaining the country but regaining religious freedom as well.Malke2010 "

Your comment on AN Proper notification was given to CorporateM. See the second post.

I'm working on it...lol.

" Forgot to sign again damn, I'm getting OLD @- Talk to the VorlonsMarkab-@ 18:08"

Whaam! edits Please stop editing Whaam! without consensus. I don't want this WP:FAC to fail due to it not being stable. (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD)

concept associate better with Street Reclaiming, The Shared Space is quite a particular innovation. All these concepts (Woonerf/Home Zone, Zone 30, Street Reclaiming, Living Street, Pedestrianisation, Shared Space) are all particular elements or philosophy under the umbrella of Traffic Calming AND City revitalisation. The

" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Little Round Top. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. (Review me!) "

Yes, well, the English name has no official standing whatsoever now, and so is redundant as Peking, Bombay or Rhodesia. It's getting moved!

Please do not edit other people's userpages, it is considered vandalism. -

1 May 2006 Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you.

ANI Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. .}} Thank you.

I am trying to create an article that has been deleted by an overzealous admin. It was in no way shape or form vandalism. Please have a look for yourself. I need help resolving this issue so that I can create this article that I feel is important and relevant. TIA

I don't understand your question.

" Scott Lost I didn't add Scott Lost to the list of Filipino Americans, all I did was change the word ""Guerilla"" (in Pro Wrestling Guerrilla) to ""Guerrilla"". I seriously have no idea whether he has Filipino roots or not."

" I have a feeling some of this article was written by Daniele Ledonne himself, e.g. the part listing all the films he made that are not especially notable. I looked at the history and a user named ""Tolka"" made much of that addition, and in the original version it even said one of his films was available for purchase at the national film network. Is he advertising here? I agree this article isn't noteworthy enough (and doesn't have any citations really) to stand on it's own and should be merged with Super Columbine Massacre RPG! article. "

statistics I think there were, but I haven't done a statistical analysis. This event is able to be precisely timed, and is widely acknowledged as factual, so I'm able to talk about it without coming across as a whiner. It's not really in my best interest to discuss any others, so I'm not all that eager to convince myself they exist. That's the path to becoming a bitter conspiracy theorist.—

" Ok - I reuploaded the image/logo and jumped through all the right hoops to establish ""fair use"". "

Heh! Thats easy for u 2 say, u didnt see the human shit in the basin sink in the boys toilet!

" The terms ""folk dance"" and ""vernacular dance"", objectively, mean the same thing. IMHO, either is ""correct"" as a description of Lindy Hop. However, ""vernacular jazz dance"" is, in my experience, the label Lindy dancers and scholars choose to apply. Lindy is a ""jazz dance"" in the sense of Marshall & Jean Stearns' book Jazz Dance: The Story of American Vernacular Dance (a sense that is not well-reflected in the current ""Jazz Dance"" article on Wikipedia). - szarka "

" Not the only one either! 303 "

Kiss my fucker shit nuts

" Sockpupperts How much we must to wait? Please see: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rtuftrbsee. This person has many sockpuppets only to controversial changes and edit-wars, nothing more. Still create new sockpuppets (for example talk(en-2) "

I am afraid i have to say he is the one editing my articles. If he does not stop neither will i. His english is so bad he should not be working on the english version of this.

Future Perfect at Sunrise has a long history of making bad decisions, look at the evidence Cla68 presented in the linked request. When an admin has misused their powers this many times, having their conduct examined by Arbcom is good for the encyclopedia. I'm determined to have this situation dealt with before I get blocked on an admin's whim again, and lose the ability to request anything at all. But I'd like to hear anything you have to say best way to accomplish that. You can read my response to The Devil's Advocate in my user talk for more details of my perspective.

" I've added the chronology and fixed the Billboard links. I didn't add the infobox for Sinatra version because I want to know your opinion before adding it. (talk) "

]] Welcome to Wikipedia, Juhko! I have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on {{#if

What's the point? Clearly you think the current table with varying column sizes, the odd reference that isn't needed anymore, and a completely random order not depending on broadcast date is much clearer than an episode list that, although it has been altered to suit the purpose, still works perfectly well. I won't be trying to edit the page anymore.

"""Sly SOB"" is a somewhat common teasing expression, not a way to seriously call somebody a son of a bitch. Please learn the vernacular before commenting on it in the future, it will save you from some embarrassment. 204.69.190.254 "

" Added.White Shadows Nobody said it was easy "

" DYK Did you know? was updated. On 25 May, 2007, from the article snakeskin gourami, which you recently nominated, been featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. "

Your Recent Edits You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution.

"Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.. nox "

" Useful documentation for this comparison can be found on p. 1 of Gabriel Danovitch, 'Handbook of Kidney Transplantation' (Philadelphia: Lippincott, 2001), where he states that ""the most efficient hemodialysis regimens currently provide only 10% tp 12% of the small solute removal achieved by two normally functioning kidneys."" This comment should be updated, however, by reference to data from the new programs of short- and long-daily home hemodialysis performed six days or nights a week, which improve solute clearance, although still fall far short of achieving what normal kidneys can do. User: JP Marat"

I set myself an aim of preserving information added to articles and confirmed by sources rather than avoiding troubles. If information will be deleted from the articles, my and your work on them will be worthless.

" Unsourced Alright, I promise I won't rightfully remove unsourced information anymore, but genre vandalising has resumed on Megadeth's page, just to let you know. I don't see any sources on ""hard rock."" Thanks. "

" Wow, you're complaining to me now? 13 days after I replied? It is up to any editor on Wikipedia to consider whether an article is within reason to post as speedy deletion. Since I was not the person who actually deleted the article, only the person who suggested to have the article deleted, please do not gripe on my talk page telling me how I should or should not contribute to Wikipedia. If you have further questions, please contact the administrator responsible for deleting your article. Please also note: If you have problems with other people editing or deleting your material, don't post it. I didn't come up with that either. It's one of Wikipedia's many policies. I suggest you read up. ''talk contribs'' "

SpikeToronto Is Gay RCP

" Your script. To Zen, your script made a number of changes. Most of which were okay. Several, however, seemed incorrect. You created wiki links to Chinese and Japanese Wikipedia where it was inappropriate.     "

" Ah ha now you have a barnstar you have to put it in your award Section =D. (Talk) "

Regarding edits made during December 28 2006 (UTC) to Bret Hart Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits.

" welfare policies are programs that use a collective wallet that is applied by judgement. this is socialism even in your own words. it is called a mixed economy. a non-centralist planned economy with fixed wages is achived through democratised economy, something advocated by all modern socialists, and most early socialists - just not by the traditionally authoritarian and corrupt russia. labour unions are an element of this, a small measure of planned economy with fixed wages by agreement. i will not have wikipedia give false information because you are not aware of what socialism means while being completely pent on pushing your propogandised POV. I know it's been demonised and the hatred of it is popularised in this one quirky country, but why is it so difficult for americans to even understand what is just a natural part of europe?· Lygophile has spoken "

Poo is nice and smally and sticky )

|listas = Apple (album)

Hi Wolfkeeper! This is an interesting proposal. I wonder if Wikipedia:How to create policy might have some useful information about how to proceed? Best wishes, (talk)

MALTESE IS ARABIC! Not Italian!

Not acceptable. That's original research. . “ fys aym”.

Language According to what I know, the Torah's language lead people to believe it was written during the era of the Second Temple...

Thanks for the cleanup on Frank Key Nice one

" OK cool. Well I have just resized the image so it is below 300 in width. Most of the wording in the template I used form Star Trek Into Darkness and others I had seen. So hopefully that will be fine ) "

Travis Gilbert Your help please with Ohnoitsjamie and the review process in general. I want to continue improving the articles I was planning on doing, but this stupid argument is holding me up. He asked me to go to that link and dispute my case on that link but I don't understand how to do so. I just want the article as it is, it does not quality for speedy deletion. Can you help me out with this?

I totally agree!151.151.109.8