Datasets:

Intuit-GenSRF

/

combined_toxicity_profanity_v2_eval_only

like 0

Looking at the source site, it's per day.

November 2007 (UTC) I've been thinking of this for a while (and I just found out about the talk thing), it says that after the blast killing Deidara, Tobi started acting different. Is there proof that that was still Tobi, or are people just assuming this? If people are, then also assume that Tobi might have been killed and it's an impostor. If Tobi was always carefree and goofy, do you think he could have gone through with being serious? 11:19, 21

" WTF?! want != need Obviously, the idiot that wrote ""the need for instant gratification"" failed economics 101. A need is something you must have for survival; that isn't instant gratification. A want is something that you would like to have but can live without. The guy that edited this is probably a consumerist moron with thousands in credit card debt. Debtors are fools that shouldn't be allowed to own anything. This is why a fully market economy can't end poverty. Only those with a proper education should be allowed to participate in a market economy. Fools that don't know the difference between a want and a need should be owned by their employer. Their employer can better determine what they need than themselves. Poverty would be eliminated by this mix of a command and market economies. The remaining unemployed, fat, and lazy fools can go to jail. I am now going to correct the article because I'm a genius and the previous editor is not. 76.178.252.151 "

{{unblock|reason=I have already submitted an unblock request but no has answered. I have my reason to be unblocked above the first review request. I did what User:Swarm told me to do, so I think I am ready to start over.

In short, I don't have a problem with inclusion of the monarch, just the way it's presented, which will confuse those unfamiliar with the subject.

—The preceding unsigned comment was added by (talk • contribs). I have no problem whatsoever with Mark Benson, all I'm trying to do is ensure that the article about him is written in accordance with the policies and guidelines of WP. For example, it seems strange to me that you continually revert my edits to the section headings - the policy for these is clearly set out in WP:MOS - it does not modify the content of the article at all, but it makes the article comply with the policies. As for adding {{cn}} to a number of your claims, it's reasonable to expect your assertions to be backed up with reliable sources. Thanks for getting in touch, let me know if there's more I can do to help.

where is the citation for this. Iran does not have ICBMs. this is fud

. She said 'I believed there is the elements.' It could be the major reason of what she decided to create 'MAR of Golden Leafs'. She answered she believed her art value in international business. reported by Writer Great Jan

, how about one of these for you??

"You can't steal copyrighted images from here, crop them, and upload them to Flickr with a spurious licence in an attempt to claim copyright. This is Flickrwashing, and leads inevitably to blocking. If you took this picture, upload it directly to Commons, with the appropriate Metadata, otherwise, please stop trying to take us for fools; we aren't. andemu "

Archive Six: February 2008 → March 2008

Oppose - per WP:ENGVAR. Multi-storey car park was the first name of this article so British English gets the nod over American English.

" I changed from ""the following three weeks"" to ""when used"", because when you write ""the following three weeks"", readers want to know when he scored his next goal. Lets say, after a month, he scores his next goal, then readers want it to be like ""... he scored his next goal after one month."" And we dont want overdetail so ""when used"" is much better, as he is isnt playing every game or a starter. So please don't revert it. His next goal we mention should be a important goal for him or the team so ""when used"" is better. "

Opps Sry Placed the Speedy too soon

Anyone editing: Anything I do I guarantee is not meant to be vandalism. I know I used to but I have changed my ways. Thank you.

" Ah, yes, here's the MastCell edit, through full protection:. IMHO, the Weekly Standard is perfectly adequate sourcing. I would have preferred it be explicitly credited in the text as the origin for the claim (which turned out to be true) that ""no evidence exists..."" but the fact that it's cited for that claim would seem to obviate the necessity of the edit. "

I think all you need to take a ten year hiatus. Go back to school. Whatever you learned in elementary school, it didn't stick. You guys really need it. Seriously.

What this block is supposed to prevent? It removes my ability to defend myself against Flyer22's unprovoked vile smear campaign.

yes, this article should be deleted, but it was created by a guy who has 2% of the GA articles in wikipedia. i just hope the other 150+ articles are not as ridiculous as this. my point is, it's impossible to take it to WP:AFD, since Tony made it a GA, and plans to keep his good record. my god, an article that has no relevance is now a good article because of a whim, because tony wanted to have one more article on his trophy shelf.190.16.243.184

The truth, according to Wikipedia The following events tool place on 2 May 2014 2pm - Rambling Man - Gerry Adams arrest is already old news, eclipsed by Max clifford etc. 6.30pm - Ritchie333 - coverage of the Adams arrest has been tabloid in nature (at the same time as he insisted BLPCRIME says don't put this on the front page) 9pm - the police are granted a further 48 hours of detention - sparking an online BBC News story of 30+ paragraphs ~10.15pm - Lokie Dokie is listening to the Stephen Nolan show on Radio 5 Live, in which there is extended discussion about how Sinn Fein are reviewing on an hourly basis what the ongoing detention of Adams means for their support for the PSNI, and accordingly, the risks to the peace process. Once finished, the show moves onto the other news of the day - Max Clifford I will not forget, even if others may already have done so.

" Well that's how it ends when I want to look clever ... such a shame ... my deepest apologies to all the defenseless ""dios"" floating over the poor non-English names and excited exclamations! (talk | contribs) "

Because the links you were adding to the episode titles were inappropriate as they all just come back to this page. Circular links are pointless, and over wikilinking is discouraged.

" I noticed the length issue on the previous review. If it's anything, they have relaxed a lot on the too long issue. MJ passed FA at 112 KB and only got 1 oppose for length. There are article that are larger than McCartney that have passed FA. It's up to you, but I think you might be surprised -) — 2 "

" Not gonna go around in circles with you on this. You're wrong, and I already took the time and explained and proved why. You're stubborn and biased, and I'm tired of it. The form ""Jehovah"" is long-established widely-used and not just be ""fringe"" groups, but you keep moving the goal post, when names are provided, you say ""they're just Christian theologians"". When I give an example of an Atheist who also uses the term etc, you find some fault or rationalize that away too, per your human nature not wanting to budge from your uptight position. The point (again) is that WP should reflect both the forms ""Yahweh"" and ""Jehovah"" since both are widely used in scholarly circles, in various contexts and books and works. I'm tired of the merry-go-round with you, on this. Something that you could have theoretically left alone, if you were half-way cool and reasonable. You're not. Also your stalking, hounding, and trolling of me is enough to get you reverted just for being disrespectful and creepy. I'm done. Bye. "

" When you say, ""The content of the article is not the issue,"" I hope you are speaking for yourself. For some of us, the content of the article is the only issue. I've been through this same thing on many articles, including al Qaeda. In the end, it didn't matter what people thought of me. The only thing that mattered is that the NPOV tag was removed and has stayed off ever since. We finally have an article for al Qaeda that conveys information and is stable. That same thing can be done with terrorism. There are only a few people here who are trying to keep terrorism undefined. If we concentrate on the article, instead of letting them confuse the issue, we can get the job done. I have proposed this definition, not as something perfect, but as something that conveys information—-a starting point. The purpose of a definition is to convey information, so that much is a bare minimum. I think my proposal is a step in the right direction because it more closely matches for what I believe a great article should encompass. "

Times is highly-respected independent, reliable UK news organization. BusinessWeek and CNN are widely-recognized independent US news organizations.

This Is Earthlink Dialup FYI, many people potentially use this ISP number. It's an Earthlink dialup node in metro Los Angeles.

Oh man You're just a lulzy cow. In the few seconds it takes me to do anything it looks like you spend countless hours overreacting by notifying admins with your bitching and moaning over completely trivial shit. And you're basically telling them to ban me because you're pissed off. When all you have to do is just revert my edits and not say anything if it bothers you that bad. You're 32 for Christs sake and your battling a bunch of kids on the Internet. I hope you feel real proud of yourself. And don't forget to look back that it was all over a simple add of Alex Jones to the See also section of Tin-foil Hat. This isn't a war like you want it to be, with your signs of relief that I'm gone for a day. It's just for the lulz and you're supplying them in mass quantities. Peace! Don't bother responding cause I'm not going to bother reading it ever.

Points a) and b) are obvious and banal. I don't accept c) at all. . “ fys aym”.

Backstreet Boys Backstreet Boys article was blanked by an IP reverted it .

Hello from Princess Rebel! Hi! I posted something on my (very long and very boring) userpage to see if there were any twelve year olds out there, and La Pianista told me about you. I KNOW you're thirteen, but does it matter? I'm almost thirteen (half a year, can't wait!) and I think like a sixteen year old, anyways. I'm from oz, and I have my heart set on finding 11-13 year old users, so even though this comment is like really gay, PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE reply! you can reply here or on my userpage, I'm not fussed.

" Attachment to the First Canadian Army In the Normandy section it says: ""The unit was attached to the First Canadian Army. This may have been done to help in communication, as the vast majority of Poles did not speak English when they arrived in UK from 1940 onwards."" So does this mean that: 1) they wanted the Poles subordinated to an English-speaking unit for command and control purposes, rather than operating independently, or that 2) there were sufficient numbers of Polish-language speakers in the Canadian Army to act as translators? There's no reference linked to this assertion. 192.0.158.233 "

pakistan section- i agree with the overall section but just some pov bit in the section and it has said to be execesive by regent parks

Not appreciated This editsummary was not appreciated. If you removed the references and made another edit to the template in the time that I removed the references, that is called a edit conflict, not disruptive editing.

" Speedy deletion of Myst fight klub A tag has been placed on Myst fight klub requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. T C "

The definition on this page is good, since I'm no mathematician I'll let someone else copy/paste it: http://www-history.mcs.st-andrews.ac.uk/history/HistTopics/Abstract_groups.html

" You've got mail! [[User_Talk:DeltaQuad| (ʞlɐʇ) ]] "

I am not doing this to be mean only to help wikipedia. This is your last warning.

I deleted the noise that you made at Jeong Darae. By what reasons, your two eyes could not see the reference at the bottom of the Jeong Darae. ( )

"I would remove the cute little kitty and change the tone of your language. You might think it's cute but in reality its condescending to pretty much anyone, especially those who have had their articles deleted. If you are trying to stand on the moral high ground by ""protecting"" Wikipedia's integrity, you might want to consider adjusting the language and image you promote in your communications with other users. "

Alumni== The alumni section is biased against the alumni. Two of the more well known alumni are listed with an unfactual, opinionated description. The descriptions should be removed and a simple link to the wikipedia artical should be solely provided. ==

[Explosiveoxygen] You keep assuming these conclusions which are not written in my edit. I'm going to make another version of my edit and if you guys keep removing it then you are in fact guilty of bias in hiding the statistics of what a kinect can or can't do. Criticism is a fine heading, I will gladly rename it or move it to another section if this helps you sleep at night. You are so being biased and then accusing me of it. Whatever you think is a conclusion is based entirely from your opinion, I did not write those things even in the first version last week which had you guys censor me. What happened to free wikipedia? Your willingness to censor information is disgusting and you guys are killing the idea of wikipedia being neutral with your bias while claiming you are neutral. ExplosiveOxygen

Thank you for the welcome. I will try and contribute where possible. My main forte is checking references and ease of writing. I review and edit history books for a living and I cannot bear to see long drawn-out sentences or poor grammar. Also it would be good to see if the friction between you and LK can be resolved. You both seem keen to produce a good article but the current atmosphere will not be conducive to that goal. That comment is aimed at both of you, as it does seem to be a little six of one and half a dozen of the other on intial review. I will try and get up to speed with the more complex parts of references. I have worked out the edit history links fairly easily (squared brackets) but it seems a bit more complex for book references. I will read through the guides. Thanks again for the welcome.

" Move? ""Bubblegum"" is the adjectival form (used to describe pop music, etc.), ""bubble gum"" is the confection. "

It's a shame that despite Wikipedia trying to shed it's image of being a poor source of information it doesn't actually seem to be doing anything about it. Facts aren't allowed here it seems on POV. Farcical.

UNLIKE THE ANCIENT GREEKS, THE IDIOT WHO BLOCKED ME IS A MONGREL CREATED BY INTERBREEDING WITH THE TURKS. JUST ANOTHER GREEK FOOL WHO DOESN'T KNOW SHIT. 98.195.24.26

It is there darn it

]] Marion Giordan Marion Giordan author of: Consumer Education_(book) Consumer Education: A Handbook for Teachers How to be Exploited_(book) [[The Consumer Jungle_(book)

Edit warring on Lenny Dykstra I have semi-protected the page - that will keep IPs and newly registered accounts from editing the page for the next week. Please use that time to come to consensus, which there clearly isn't. Good luck! - | Talk

16 October 2013 JessieLTurner

2007 (UTC) As a Ron Paul supporter, I affirm what the above poster says. I came to this article because some of the things Cafferty says resounds with me as a conservative republican and I've come to appreciate what the man has to say. 05:20, 15 November

State party I like as with Unesco, they dont get involved in politics and so list members as State Party. So in theory SeaLand could become a state party despite being a self goverend off shore platform.

" If and only if ""other ways of addressing these questions"" means ""theology"" then we could say the same more clearly and with fewer words with: N: Philosophy deals with fundamental questions such as how one should live (ethics), what sorts of things exist and what are their essential natures (metaphysics), and what counts as genuine knowledge (epistemology). Philosophy deals with such general and fundamental problems as the sorts of things which exist, and the nature, scope and limits of knowledge, understanding, moral judgments, mind and language. and their relationships with each other and the world Philosophy is distinguished from other ways of addressing these questions the theology by its critical approach using reasoned argument, accepting no higher authority than reason. The word ""philosophy"" is of Ancient Greek origin: φιλοσοφία (philosophía), meaning ""love of knowledge"", ""love of wisdom"". Philogo "

Please look slightly up the page, at the templates there. This should improve your comprehension somewhat. Talk

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. ~(talk)

As after one week we have a 4-1 majority for the name change it should be done.

, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Wikipedia Boot Camp, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few more good links for to help you get started: The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Help pages Tutorial How to write a great article Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!

knol == who the H-F is removing knol's entry? ==

" for great justice and epic lulz The Barnstar of Good Humor For your contributions to the list of fictional vehicles.Cheers, for The Article Ridicule Team"

" In my opinion, the sheer number of sources for the section that are ""liberal"" bespeak lack of balance which I'll try, at least, to rectify by maybe finding a useful quote from Mark Skousen's piece on Beck and his uncle in Human Events magazine. "

" As always, I appreciate very much the collegial way we work together. I will say, as anyone would notice, that I tried to be polite and take the high road with that other editor in the beginning. His disingenuous baiting and needling, together with deliberately inane questions designed to elicit an intemperate response, finally reached a point where they needed calling out and once his stalking me to other pages began, I can't be polite anymore once the crazy behavior starts. Not sure what you mean by ""a still-active editor,"" but I do like the idea of grouping. While I'm still uncomfortable with laundry- listing a host of insignificant awards, I've always been a big believer in compromise solutions. And this seems a good one, because it creates a necessary perspective. I've suggested some initial possibilities at the WP:FILM discussion we started some time ago. Do you think that'd be a good place to start? "

" I wish I could, Psychohistorian, but I can't as I have been gagged by an administrator who considers I am something of a ""systematic personal attacker"", no matter I had no complaints before. Honestly, I suggest you to take a break and leave the article to Stormfront for a while. You can always retake it later, nominate the article for deletion, open an RfC, etc. Do not violate the 3RR please. It's better to bear a bad article than to be blocked on unquestionable grounds as that. But personally I am quitting it for mental health. I have more than enough with appealing my unjust block and other areas that interest me more than a non-existent race. Maybe, if my appeal succeeds, and after a loooong recess, I might retake it. But not right now. Sorry. "

Oh, the pay is wonderful. I actually am Sacha Baron Cohen. I'm an anti-semitic, pro-Zionist, Jewish, anti-Zionist, pro-Nazi, German, Arab, Pro-Semitic Double agent of the Iranian-US-Israeli world conspiracy against everyone. We rule the world, cause all the naughty things that happen all in the cause of taking over the world. I'm also a Gnome of Zurich. -)

" Ergo, it's neither the flag of the PA nor of the ""Palestinian Territories"" (whatever that means), but of a now-defunct British protectorate, and therefor belongs un nneither infobox. What's your point again? And where are your reliable sources backing it up? 24.177.122.31 "

Cryptic, I think this was a really bad block but I don't think you should resign. However, I think it is important that you make a comment at the ANI discussion. Whether it's to say you stand by the block and explain your block rationale or to say that you made a mistake and won't do it again (whichever is the case). I don't think this going to go away otherwise and I'm concerned that if you don't come and talk there, it will end up snowballing. Please consider. Thanks, Sarah

Subjectivity This user has a propensity to abuse his status by interfering with sourced articles. This user has proven to watch too much television leaving his personal life, and life skills comprimised. This user is a fan of big black cock.

"Race & genetics== Addressing Crusio's comment, there are markers that could be looked for. for example is the PCSK9 allele, this is all in the context that certain races are more susceptible to certain diseases. Certain races also respond differently to medications. Certain allels are prevalent in only certain races (although there is race mixing as immigration and such, the alleles are still passed on) I'm sure you all know I'm alluding to NitroMed's BiDil. In this case, BiDil seems to help heart failure in african americans more then other races. Should we not research into this? Would it be racist to give african americans (in the article, they were ""self identified black patients"") this medicine? I think a lot of the stigma around nazi's and eugenics and racism has halted the academic freedom into research into this matter. People needs to understand that as an academic, one must have an academic view on things. If a particular drug helps a particular race, then why not use it? But we can't CHOOSE what results produces, we must accept them in order to change. ie. If a particular gene/allele is present in one race that's lacking in others, I must ACKNOWLEDGE the difference in order to help develop methods to create possible genetic cures. To turn a blind eye to this is not only limiting academic freedom, but is an injustice to humanity as a whole. An example is seen in the case of Lysenkoism, which caused famines that killed millions. == "

I'm cleaning up some refs and responding, so don't get deletion happy since MOST of your criticism will NOT pass WP:RSN. ''''

" Say what? I decide to check out the AfD articles, not something I normally get involved in. I come to an article for deletion, A Course in Miracles (book). I look over it I see it's been documented and footnoted almost to the very last comma. I observe a tremendous argument ensuing over one word, ""cult"", that's being interpreted multiple ways. Multiple editors are squabbling over whether User:Ste4k is being ""POV"" for using it. I change the wording to eliminate the troublesome word while meeting what I see as the intent of the original author of the quote, Garrett. I think I do an adequate if not very eloquent job. I go to a lot of effort to explain what and why I made the change, citing the dictionary, etc. I do screw up and forget to sign some of my work, which you helpfully catch and fix. I then vote in the AfD to delete the article but to keep its content and merge it into the main article. I explain my reasoning, but without going into detail as to my views of both articles as they presently stand. If I had, I would have said something along the lines that the main article flows well and is comprehensive; I think it's generally well written. At the same time, it screams out for about 200 {{fact}} tags. It's not clear to me how reliable it is. The book article, by contrast, is not as pretty and, as the principal author herself more or less says, reads like a U.S. District Court decision. There's a reason judges' decisions are not high literature and that's because they're shooting for reliability and precision, not memorable prose. There's considerable overlap between both articles with much discussion as to whether there should be a book article and a movement article or just one combined article; there's even discussion as to whether the word ""movement"" should be used. It seems to me as it all this talk of different articles is putting the cart before the horse (reliability), so I vote ""merge and delete"" so that the overall Wikipedia coverage can get fixed and streamlined with some sort of consensus built. Now I wake up and I find that you've spent

hours during the night sarcastically mutilating your own article. It appears that one word, ""cult"", and my good faith editing of its usage may have been your tipping point to go into a frenzy. That or my one vote in the AfD process. If you don't like my cult edit, just reverse it and explain how I got it wrong. Then there's this message on my talk page: ""I'm not originally from the U.S. I was born in Kharkov. In our country, we beat liars, and if one wants to eat, they work. The only POV in that article I wrote was that I wanted to find out the truth, did research, marked it with citations for verifiability, refused to consider any source that came from some primary provider, and all I found out for my trouble was that this encyclopedia isn't even worth quoting. You should be ashamed to have your familiy member's name on this medium. "" What do I make of this? Are you saying that I'm a liar and should (or would) be beaten? That I should be working harder to eat? And what's this about my family? And as for Wikipedia, being flawed, it certainly is that. It is profoundly flawed in terms of the reliability of some of its material. In fact, if so many millions of people didn't use it, I'd say forget about it. But the fact is, Wikipedia is very important and growing in importance everyday. Every day, more people abandon traditional sources of reliable information such as Britannica and turn to Wikipedia. Every month, Wikipedia's Google rankings move up higher and are often in the top 5 for a given search. The fact that so many other sites such as answers.com mirror the content makes what's written in Wikipedia seem all the more ""reliable"" since to the undiscerning, it looks like other sites are agreeing with Wikipedia. So like it or not, Wikipedia is here to stay and further grow in importance. You can fume and I can fret, but our children and grandchildren will use it more and more as their first source of knowledge, reliable or not. That almost pessimistic view of Wikipedia's growing role is what motivates me not some idealistic, Woodstockian no

tion that ""information longs to be free"" or so much of the other idealistic stuff that motivates thousands of mostly earnest, smart but very young editors on this project. "

" Postwar damage The article currently states, In 1956, the lower part of the painting was severely damaged when someone doused it with acid. On December 30 of that same year, Ugo Ungaza Villegas, a young Bolivian, damaged the painting by throwing a rock at it. Can anyone perhaps elaborate on this? I mean, the dousing of the painting with acid is reported as though this is a normal thing to be done to a masterpiece and so nothing further needs to be said about it. Did someone just stroll into the Louvre with a beaker of acid and throw it onto the painting? I'd be interested to know the circumstances of this event, in particular why this was done and how it was allowed to happen. Who did it? What was the motivation? How was it repaired? etc. etc. |Talk "

Right, so an E-4 airman is going to warn off an O-5 LTC who's in the CID. whatever. In any event, that guy is nothing but a vandal. But I don't see you trying to warn him off, kid. In fact, you did nothing.

" ergdjkllfdsaSDFJKL;KJFDSA52talk to me! "

Yes by all means take care of it. Thanks. I'd do it myself but it won't let me create a new page. Maybe leave the most recent stuff and get rid of the Peter Van Sant pages.

I prefer your version. I was going to revert (Talk/Contrib) 13:57, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)

" ""AoS"" = ""Aeon of Strife"". That does not describe what the game looks like at all. ""Defense of the Ancients"" is more descriptive, in fact, as it actually indicates that you have something to defend. '''''' (talk) "

Just a shame the recent trail of edits have again tried to bring down the information content of the article I started in good faith.

what are you talking about ? I did not vandalize anything, this is a government computer network system.

"There is a version where the last line goes ""there's none so rare as can compare with the voice of the infantry"" (which similarly goes through the ranks). I have sung as a campfire song at historical reenactments but I can't easily attribute that version. 176.252.226.165 "

population ? id like to know the population of this city? i understand that the population of the whole island was 86,637 in 2004 but id like to know how much of that was the capital of nueva gerona. 76.211.5.253

Jesus...Whatever she's doing, I can voice my opinion to it. This is a discussion page, not an encyclopedia entry. I didn't say she should be MADE silent. I have no intention of 'making her silent'. Just giving my opinion here, which I think is a perfectly valid one. As for her jurisdiction, commentary on talk page is within everyone's jurisdiction. You're an illustration of all that's wrong with Wikipedia. You don't make logical sense, you derive understandings of things that are said that weren't in fact said. You make snap judgements on things without taking the information for what it is. You're too underqualified to undertake anything of an intellectual or scholarly nature. Wikipedia is worse off having the likes of you as an admin.

" Removal of a valid message by yourself on SomeHuman's talk page SomeHuman has removed your completely valid message on his talk page, on the (spurious) grounds that it went in between his and my reply to him. You may like to include it again. I would have done it, but am unsure whether this would be viewed in a good light by others. I am seriously getting tired of this editor's actions.  (talk) "

Just because Spielberg said it don't necessarily mean that it's true. It may be identifiable once more becomes available.

I have been blocked for 2 instances of losing my cool and no other look at anything has taken, place you have not looked at the things he said calling me uneducated a troll, you have just took a quick look at the comments and blocked me without investigating further.

That section has no substantiated claims and has unverifiable information which is forbidden to have on Wikipedia. No claims have ever been made about Starforce having to be removed via formatting the partition it is installed on because it can be removed via the official removal tool. Therefore I am putting the warning back up.

" Aaron Johnston? Was the Aaron Johnston who was on this show the same Aaron Johnston who is the son of Lynn Johnston of ""For Better or For Worse"" fame? "

" User:Public Juju/Sandbox Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Canis lupus 265b.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. '''''' Talk "

Hey, fixed, thanks. (talk)

"Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Talk • • Contrib "

" Edit-warring MilesMoney, left the following comment on my (NK's) talk page: This revert constitutes edit-warring, particularly as you left no edit comment and did not participate in the subsequent talk page discussion. Please do not edit-war. It is a damn lie. I have made one edit to the Progressive Tax page. One edit for the whole time the article has been in existence. You just did not like the edit that I made. You saw my edit and then you went to my talk page and left the above lie. Please stop lying about those who simply disagree with you on edits. Please stop being an edit warrior. It will get you banned from all of Wikipedia eventuallynot just topic banned as you are now. Please review all of Wikipedia's rules before it is too late. There is an article on Economic inequality, please push your position over there.If there is no article on ""Income Inequality"" then make that article and stop attempting to use the progressive tax article as a coathanger to add POV about income inequality. "

Ref desk queries Could you please refrain from asking the exact same question for the second time after it's already been answered? It wastes people's time and it's just plain annoying. Thanks in advance! 67.169.177.176

" That doesn't seem plausible to me. You certainly seemed to get past the ""edit conflicts"" when you deleted my comments on your Talk page without responding to them. I wanted to have a civil discussion, but you were making it impossible to do so by not replying to my questions. If you didn't ignore and then delete valid questions, you might get called a ""jerk"" less often."

" I've removed this unsourced information. It's a zero! "

"Re:MOTDThere is no need to be sorry, we all are busy. We will go for the 7th anniversary party then. I will approve that nomination very shortly. I have also approved Einstein's quote/motto about genius and stupidity some 10 hours ago, ...and for his anniversary (14 March or 18 April). Best! – (talk • contribs) "

What I know is entirely from the law case reports. -| — ntnood 17:27, July 19, 2005 (UTC)

" Ok sorry I had no idea it was ""your article"". Nobody will make any further edits because you own it. "

" Response to Your defence of LGagnon. Please check appropriate, relevant and significant details before you post messages to the contrary at my User Page. That should be a basic minimum for any Administrator, I should think. At the Ayn Rand Talk Page you will find evidence of my attempts to talk to Lgagnon. Just infra I post here a copy of my Memo to the Wikipedia Board articulating my frustration in this regard. Sir(s)/Madam(Mesdames): I continue to have problems with LGagnon at Wikipedia. He sends me the most ill-written messages. It is almost impossible to wade through the bad grammar, misspellings/typos; etc to get his point. He indulges the most foul personal attacks with regard to everyone, even Wikipedia admins, referring to the latter as ""vandal-coddling."" He never backs up his unthinking assertions. He simply asserts. Why does Wikipedia continue to indulge one but one lamentably under-educated vulgarian in this regard, to this degree? What could possibly be the explanation????!!!!!!!! Please, Please, Please respond. I have tried to reason with the lad. I tried humour. I have issued warning after warning. He is as osmotically impervious to the ratiocinative as he is to any other recognizably human mode of intervention. Anthony Oluwatoyin (Wikipedia user name: AOluwatoyin). AOluwatoyin"

" Good point how does the title relate to the meaning of apartheid? This was discussed somewhat in the centralized Talk and the synthesis. There are two meanings of apartheid: (1st) The official self-described policy of South Africa. (2nd) Similar or analogous policies in other places. The title ""Israeli apartheid"" uses the 2nd meaning. This seems to favor the anti-Israel side. In the suggestion that started this thread ""Comparisons between Israel and apartheid-era South Africa"" the word 'apartheid' has the 1st meaning. This arguably favors the pro-Israel side. But ""Israel and apartheid""?? Gee, one of the interesting things about ""Israel and apartheid"" is that the noun 'apartheid' is not modified (either by Israeli or SA). So here the meaning of 'apartheid' is ambiguous. If you don't mind my asking a follow-up question, Andyvphil, don't you think that ambiguity might add to the appeal of such a title? | Talk "

, most probably via a google search