Datasets:

Intuit-GenSRF

/

combined_toxicity_profanity_v2_eval_only

like 0

Please familiarize yourself with WP:NOT. Wikipedia is not a Soapbox to promote your RACIST POV

Wouldn't it be more accurate to describe Castro as current dictator or ruler of Cuba? President implys elected with consent of the people which Castro clearly is not.

It is indeed, haha. That's how you say Archaeogod, good sir. I had to self-out because of that awesome cover and also some academic work being done involving Tel Kabri. For the most part they do have something of a language requirement in the US because when you have archaeology departments outside of anthro departs they're typically rolled into (or heavily associated with) classics. This has actually been the topic of conversation on several pub trips (an essential element in archaeology). Thankfully it's never too late to dig though, so age isn't a factor in the actual process of digging. | Say Shalom! 11 Tevet 5774

"""free source"" train, keep safety in mind. And finally the reminder. It is not a threat. Officials truly are watching the page and planning to take appropriate action."

February 2014 (UTC) Official confirmation given. 220.245.146.235 18:16, 6

" Please stop Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - Wiki me up® "

"== Christopher Biggins == ""Socialite"" would require a reliable source since it's such a vague term. If you can provide one, fine, but otherwise it's too vague to be encyclopedic. Thanks. andemu I think that you are probably right! "

jealous stop removing valuable information. the remix is released to further promote the song. just like the katy perry song E.T. was released online as a single than followed by the remix feat. kanye west.

Rjanag's profile reveals that he is likely connected with the East Turks.

" Mentioning Darwin gave up natural selection and became a Lamarckian The article currently makes no mention of the historically important fact that Darwin himself converted from the natural selection theory of evolution to a Lamarckian environmentalist position in later editions of The Origin of Species, which went into 6 different editions by 1872. Hence I propose the following insert at the first Darwin quotation in the current section ‘Publication of the theory of natural selection’, which I also propose should be retitled ‘Publication of the Darwin’s theory of evolution’. Proposed insert: 'However, even in the first edition of his book Darwin only claimed natural selection was the main means of selection, but not the only one. In the last sentence of its Introduction he said “Furthermore, I am convinced that natural selection has been the main but not exclusive means of modification.” But by 1872 he had published six editions of the book with corrections and revisions, and in later editions in response to criticism of his theory of inheritance Darwin even gave up the theory of natural selection as the main selector of evolution, with its strong principle of inheritance, in favour of Lamarckian environmentalism, with a changing environment as the main selector. As C.D. Darlington wrote in 1950 in his Foreword to a new and first reprint of the otherwise unavailable first edition of The Origin: ""Let no one imagine, however, that, in the world of science, Darwin's theory has enjoyed an unchequered prosperity. On the contrary the dust of battle is only now beginning to settle on the hotly disputed ground....The most abiding source of trouble was that discovered by the Professor of Engineering at Edinburgh. Professor Fleming[sic] Jenkin pointed out in 1867, that any new variation appearing in one individual would be lost or swamped in later generations when that individual was compelled to cross with others of the old and established type, and its differences, as Darwin believed, blended in inheritance. Nature would never be able to keep any differences to select. Darwin's defence against this objection was already prepared. He had hinted it in the first edition of The Origin of Species: at the end of the Introduction he had said that "

"Natural Selection has been the main but not exclusive means of modification."" In later editions he hedged further. He fell back on the other means. These depended chiefly on the action of a changing environment: its direct effect in altering living things so as to suit it must be inherited. In adopting this view Darwin was giving up his own, and Wallace's, peculiar claim to originality: he was giving up the argument implied in the title of the book: and he was falling back on the discarded and disreputable theory of Lamarck."" [p. xvii On the Origin of Species by means of Natural Selection first edition reprint in The Thinker's Library by Watts & Co, 1950.] ' But Darlington failed to establish Lamarck's theory was discarded or disreputable. In fact the theory of natural selection only became accepted in the mid-20th century with the ‘Mendelian-Darwinian synthesis’ in population genetics. But even by 1950 Darwinism was still not accepted in academia according to Darlington: ""In view of the triumph of his ideas it might be thought that Darwinism, in all civilised countries, would be taught as one of the foundations of thought, that in the universities everywhere it would be critically expounded and experimentally developed. That is true of its remote and general applications to such sciences as astronomy and geology. But where, as in its applications to ourselves, in the study of the genetics of men, and to the histories of nations, as exact knowledge of the principles of variation, hybridization and selection is required, we hear on every side nothing but confused and ignorant speculations. At the same time the foundation of Darwinism in the experimental study of evolution has largely been smothered in Darwin's own country. The Universities, with their museums and botanic gardens, are happy to forget what, in 1859, they were unable to resist. They contain no memorial of his work, and all the means of developing his doctrine they frustrate by an arrangement of teaching which the theory of evolution is not allowed to disturb. The old pedantic learning of botany and zoology, which Darwin treated as one subject, they continue to cleave asunder, burying the halves under their an

cient schedules of instruction."" [‘’ibid’’ pxviii-xix]. ' I also propose the following edit of the article's introduction: His 1859 book ‘’On the Origin of Species’’ posited natural selection was the main selector in the evolution and origin of species, but by its 1872 sixth edition Darwin had abandon

. If I come to your talk page, please reply there. If you come to me, then I'll leave a talkback on your page

" I do think that it means Soviet Union, not its role in the war in the quote. Otherwise it would be a rather weird sentence for the Telegraph. Compare, ""with those who ""belittle"" the Soviet Union's role in the war or criticise the role of Soviet Union in any way"" vs ""with those who ""belittle"" the Soviet Union's role in the war or criticise Soviet Union in any way"". However, is the draft of the proposed bill available for public? Might be easiest just to check the original source, instead of looking for quotes. "

I want to fuck her too. After Niahm though.

kept reverting my edits, so he

Full text in Bulgarian

" Well for starters it might help if you wrote it in English, this being the English Wikipedia and all that. Second there were no actual references to demonstrate any notability Talk "

Oh, I did not mean to give off the impression that you offended me. That's not what I was going for at all. My message on your talk page was simply about my agreeing with you in not agreeing with Excuseme99. By your restoring the article to the edit before my recent one, I simply felt that you were trying to get the article back to a better state than Excuseme99's edit (which was clear). Sure, I felt that you had a problem with my tweaking of his edit (as in you did not like either of the edits), but I was not holding that against you. I simply wanted to know why you objected to my edit of that part of the lead. Thank you for explaining. I did point out how I feel that my edit is different than the current one, but I do not have a huge problem with the way that part of the lead currently is. It has been that way for the longest now, as I stated on Excuseme99's talk page. I very much respect you as well. The work you have done on the Brad Pitt article has been fantastic, as you know. You are the one who came along and fixed it up so well, and I appreciate that.

Nice shit: Mario ft. Fabolous - If the Walls Were Watching http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BAX8oHnVoSk Trinity 5:7 - Heaven Hear My Heart http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SkT1fZfEKa4

Hurricane Patsy (1959) track update I've put together a HURDAT version of a track update for Hurricane Patsy (1959). Could you update the file with this version when you get a chance? Thanks 03210 09/06/1959 M= 5 11 SNBR= 98 PATSY XING=0 (CP) 03215 09/06* 0 0 0 0*2001810 75 0*2081795 120 0*2221785 150 0* 03220 09/07*2351781 120 0*2491782 120 0*2621791 120 0*2691803 120 0* 03225 09/08*2731813 100 0*2771818 100 0*2791820 100 0*2811821 120 0* 03230 09/09*2841820 90 0*2921813 90 0*3021807 80 0*3121800 80 0* 03235 09/10*3211795 60 0*3301791 45 0*3401789 45 0*3511789 45 0* 03275 09/11E3751802 45 0* 0 0 0 0* 0 0 0 0* 0 0 0 0* 03240 HR

" A barnstar for you! The Technical Barnstar For solving the malfunction of my script. — ChatLimited Access "

How about This How about just wait until the game gets released? I don't think it's fair to call the game simply a port when it is adding on two new characters. Not to mention new content. Fully voice dialogue, etc. There's no arguing that this is basically a remake of So2 but it's also adding new features. Therefore, I don't think it's a port but it's not the same game either. It's somewhere in between. It's a remake with add ons. If Yamagishi wants the remakes to feel like two totally different games, then why don't we treat them as such until we find out otherwise. This is even MORE TRUE for First Departure. How on earth can First Departure be a direct port of Star Ocean when it has the Star Ocean 2 battle engine? According to these entries and some other news I've read, it seems that both of the remakes have a fair amount of new things. Being a tri-ace fan since 1998, I'd advise you probably just wait. This isn't just like comparing Valkyrie Profile and Valkyrie Profile: Lenneth. This is much different.

" I really can't see the point in using old languages. Old Norse had also different dialects. So it probably has been spelled in different ways in Iceland, Norway, Denmark or Sweden. The English word is still ""Ragnarok"". Comanche cph "

" Zoroastrianism stuff I thought you might want to know, the same kind of POVing is going on at Christianity and World Religions. (talk) "

More or less on a wiki-break due to pressing family issues. If I don't respond right away that's why.

" No, neither of those other Pythons directed any Potter movies. But, neither of them were favorites of Rowling, as Gilliam was. She wanted Gilliam to direct one, or more, of the movies, but was shot down. Therefore, it is relevant. -''''''The'FortyFive' "

And if some editors do not believe this supposed WP:V WP:NPOV WP:RS contribution is suitable for a WP:BLP, then by consensus, it is not to be included until consensus is formed. And i'll repeat, consensus is required to keep disputed contributions, not to remove them. No argument can be thrown up that can move past this hurdle.

have read all your comments below and respect them totally . thank you anyway and rules are rules . my site is commercial if you count making the meakest of funds to help run itself , but i must stress again that my site was built out of passion for where i live , not revenue stream , i run my own software company as a real day job www.global7.co.uk . but thanks again for all your commenst and i totally see all your points. all the best for running this fab section.

" Welcome Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see: The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Help pages Tutorial How to write a great article Manual of Style You are welcome to continue editing articles without logging in, but you may wish to [ create an account]. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits. If you edit without a username, your IP address () is used to identify you instead. In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on , or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page. Again, welcome! "

If you have only the minimum requirements for basic (512 MB) I wouldn't do it. It will slow down your computer a lot. ParlateContribs@ (Let's go Yankees!)

Help Can someone please undo this vandalism ? -

I went to WP:IRC and couldn't find it. Can you provide a link?

Because the Scottish Episcopal Church is a part of the Anglican Communion and therefore Anglicanism, many assume that it is a Scottish district in Britain...or something like that.

" Query While I applaud your closing of the MFD page on RFC/U and the suggestion that it should be improved, it appears that little improvement is forthcoming. What is your opinion on this matter? >Radiant< "

" Trump's ethnic cleansing George Will, notable Conservative pundit, is the one whose view is that Donald Trump has proposed ethnic cleansing. I would never myself express an opinion in an encylopedia article. I merely voted that we add Will's highly notable opinion. This is in reference to his deportation plan of over 20 million Mexican-Americans, over half of whom were born here. Considering the amount of force one would require to deport 20 million human beings (hint:the military would most certainly be required), Will is by no means wrong or expressing an idiosyncratic view in accusing Trump of advocating ethnic cleansing, or a forcible homogenization of the population. Ethnic cleansing need not imply that Trump has promised to kill anyone, only that he has promised to ""make America more ethnically homogenous again"", by force. Have a pleasant day. "

2 Excuse me? Tyrannosaurus, if you think 'you really made this. i love this. how can that be' is insulting, you must get into a lot of fights. Are you this touchy with your family. Do you take offense to comments like this if your mother said it and then get upset with her? if you have, you have a chip on your shoulder. That's very... you know. I won't say anymore. I don't want you to take offense as it's very likely.

Not at all, I've been meaning to take it out for a test drive actually. How do you like it?

I hugely disagree. Him staring in a movie is a huge thing for any person and there should be something to represent his new soldier gimmic.

All you lies are detailed to you. Unable to defend even one of them, what do you do - dsiplay your intolerance by getting rid of bold text ! have you no honour or integrity at all ??? GENERAL TOJO

Kayageum How do you know that? It was very long ago. Maybe named for the Gaya confederacy.

Oppose. The definite article is part of the name Flawed reasoning for move.

Pussy? Why is the term Pussy inculded in the beginning of the article?

Jerry Williams AFD Thanks for informing me about the nature of the league. I normally try to steer clear of AFDs to do with sports but there were few comments so I tried to get the ball rolling, glad someone could correct me though. I have changed my opinion on the matter and edited the AFD as appropriate. Cheers -

Where it says Do not add [...] people without Wikipedia articles to this list on the date pages it means it. You'll need to create an article about whoever before adding their dates of birth or death.

Yeah, because my blocks weren't justified, same goes for this here. 142.162.164.114 '142.162.164.114 '

Civility Please refrain from posting sandbox messages on Hossein.ir's page- you know very well he is experienced and doesn't need to experiment in the sandbox and your suggestion that he need do so is an obvious insult.

"17:36, 21 Jun 2012 (UTC) If If you're going to keep editing, then you really ought to revise the top of your page. We don't need a layer of silly accusations about your integrity or truthfulness driven by the disconnect between your words and your actions. Good point, though I've not really decided what my intentions Wikipedia-wise are. For the moment, I'm just checking in occasionally, and dealing with subjects on my existing watchlist, and don't intend to spend much time here - in any case, my personal life is in a state of flux at the moment, and I can't really make any long-term plans. I'll remove the 'Retired' section though, as it is plainly not true. This place still seems to have a hold on me... a little light reading As the only recipient of the Grumpy editor award, I thought you may enjoy a little light reading "

How come you have not taken similar action against User:Itaqallah who started this by attacking article of my faith by putting his POVs. He also called me names which I did not. Why did you punish the reaction and not the action?

May 2008 Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

MY OWN PAGE HOWEVER I LIKE IT

"boy Hayden? ""Very funny"" Hayden! Zyklon B......! Guess you go loco unless you cant see black, white and red at the same time? Facts? What do you know about facts my little friend with very very very short hair?"

Jeeezus wept! 60% of this page is still fantasy bullshit! If someone else doesn't whittle down this pile of crap, *I will*. Seriously: what kind of idiot thinks the 'Tristan chord' has something anything to do with quartal harmony? This page is everything that's wrong with wikipedia: clueless, semi-literate, amateur twaddlings presented as scholarship. Shocking!

Genre: Recent genre edit vs. New one? Due to an edit from , I feel those who want to edit the page should discuss the genre first. I've edited the genre to make it look like the genre description for the film Be Kind Rewind, this genre stating it is a psychological romantic thriller with comedic elements. Since the movie does mostly involve a psychopath, that should be a genre. Since there are mostly comedic moments, the genre edit now should be kept. What do you think? - , 12:52 PM, 2 August, 2014

" Thanks! Thanks for participating in my RFA! I appreciate your support. ^^^ "

edit: I found a link to the interview on youtube, I don't know how long it will stay up because of copyright concerns but he does say he is 73 years old. Fast-forward to the 6:12 mark or so, its his last question: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rbu5FxD9IUg

REDIRECT Talk:Murasame-class destroyer (1958)

" Cause of death of Allan Bloom Dear Threebythree: at your invitation I have responded to your edit to the Bloom article on that talk page. Looking at the list of your many and valuable Wiki-contributions I see a pattern in what seems to interest you: Glen Beck, ""Restore Honor Rally,"" Fox News, Bill O' Reilly, Tea Party, and so forth. I take it that if you were to call yourself something, you would not call yourself a liberal? I wonder, if it is not too intrusive to ask, would you more likely describe yourself as a mainstream Republican, or as a Tea Partier? I'll watch this page, and the Bloom discussion page, and look forward to your response. "

" The Halo's RfA {| |- | |valign=top|Mark Dingemanse...Thank you very much for the constructive criticism in your oppose comment in my request for adminship. Ultimately, no consensus was reached, and I failed to be promoted, but I am very grateful for your coments. I will strive to better myself in all areas, especially Mainspace. Θ |}"

I don't know if this is exactly like the Press Release but you can use this as a source: http://tvguide.sympatico.msn.ca/RealityTV/Articles/090624_hells_kitchen_6_contestants_AD

Talkback We are discussing the use of your map for Pelasgians. Maybe you have some input. Thanks and regards

You are still not listening. Spoilers are allowed by the Wikipedia guidelines, but no more than necessary should be included. The stuff currently in the article is going overboard. When a series consists of multiple games, spoilers are kept off the main article and placed on character pages/lists or articles for the individual games. You wouldn't expect to go to an article for a movie and find spoilers for the sequel, right? And I've seen many main pages for game and movie series, and they all just contain general info, with links to other, more specific articles.

p>Yes you called him idiot. But who cares. When? ~ When? ~ May I just comment that this section is also commenting on the editor and not the edits. Ok, how about adding few words without pov that video is grisly, as it originally says in cnn link or any other link?How can that be pov, lol?!only here why did you remove links on saddam's last hour and martyrdom?

J Bar and C Fred + Onorem are having group anal sex together.- all three of them are Wikipedians who are going to get owned. They like to share things such as AIDS and another assoertment of STD'S.

(watching:) Ping works well if a ping is signed, it doesn't work if it is inserted later in a signed comment, and I don't trust it to work from within templates (although it seems to work). - I will perhaps start listing days without noticeboards as happier than the others, - remembering the last waste of time on AE,

There is only so much time in a day Gavin. You have not answered any of my questions. This article has only one or two sources. That is not good. Any changes I added were to base future, hopefully soon, references on; I have no intention of leaving it that way. I am dismayed that the '22 points' which you regard as sacrosanct, I think is both unwieldy and largely unsourced, is even in this article. Where does it come from? please let us collaborate I do not want or seek an edit war. I have now collected a range of good new sources today which I shall endeavour to reference into the article. There are also many sub-topics not yet included in this article, such as frictions, roles, encroachment, and demarcation within professions. These need to be added in as this is supposed to be an encylopaedia. Can I count on your cooperation or disagreement? I do not think undoing previous edits is the way forward at this stage. Let us cooperate. thank you Peter morrell

" Actually, it clearly does not involve power, even in your cherry picked definition. As far as what pir states above, my immediate response is ""thats insane!"", and while I know thats not terribly polite or productive, I must admit a momentary disadvantage due to my complete suprise and confusion as to how anyone could possess such ideas. Suffice it to say that if anyone intends to state within the article space that europeans ""invented"" the very concept (rather than the word) of racism as a tool of conquest, this article will need its factual accuracy disputed. Obviously I find the very suggestion breathtakingly absurd, and doubtless I am not alone in such an appraisal. I think I'll give you some time to rethink, as I am suspicious you might not have ment precisely what you said. [Spade] 11:55, 1 Oct 2004 (UTC)"

Honestly this AN/I report and the block look more and more as witch hunt, and witch hunt it is.

" xkcd Hey! A fan pointed me over to where you had deleted the line about my working for NASA from the short article on me (Randall Munroe), labeling it ""patently made-up information"". Understandable and taken in good humor, of course, and nothing on the page is sourced (it's more of a stub than anything). But I'm curious why you were so sure it was fabricated. ) xkcd I find it hard to believe that a 22-year-old could have been working full-time for NASA. Of course, you may well be freakishly gifted and the kind of person that NASA would have been all over, but it just seems ever so slightly hard to believe. - Schreit mich an I interned there during college and started working for them a bit before I graduated. I stayed for the better part of a year until late 2006. NASA is a huge organization with a tremendous number of contract positions on all sorts of projects. It's not all rocket scientists leaning over mission control screens and talking to astronauts on their headsets. Anyway, the information is taken from my published bio page, but you're right you have no way of knowing whether I'm lying or not. I guess it's probably safest to assume that I am. In that case, I'll admit my mistake and congratulate you on interning and working in a pretty impressive place (I know very little about science, but anyone who got to work for NASA has got to be a smart cookie in that kind of area). Feel free to re-add the info, although the impression I got from the original version was more than you weren't just a contract worker. If that's not even a valid distinction in the States - it's increasingly less of one here in Oz - then my apologies there in advance. - Schreit mich an Honestly, they never really explained to me which one I was. I went to work every day in a building at NASA where I worked on NASA robots, and NASA paid me (through a government contractor). When I said ""I work for NASA"" no one argued. It was a lot more Dilbert-esque than you would expect. Old, echoing tile hallways with quiet, gruff middle

-aged men working at blueprint-covered desks, mild office politics, lots of presentations and buzzwords, and hours spent wading through computer code trying to figure out why the motor on the lab bench was spinning the wrong way. I thought it sounded like the perfect place to work, and it was good in a lot of ways, but I was happy to leave. xkcd Can you nominate my entry Hey BigHaz, can you please show me how the nomination process goes for DYK, I mean is it nominated the same way like featured articles are nominated. Actually, this thing is new to me. Thanks Sure thing. The way it works is that your nomination which you made is called the ""hook"". That gets put onto the Suggestions page, which I'll move it to in a moment. Over the next few days, people will make various comments about it - if the ""hook"" is too long, if it needs sources, whatever else. If you're able to respond to those comments (if there are any made), then your article might get selected. - Schreit mich an By suggestion pages you mean to say talk pages or what It's not easy to do that, since the suggestions are cleared from the page after they get onto the front page, so I really can't just point you to a page and say ""here you are"". What particularly do you want to see? If you're after examples of the kinds of comments people make, just keep an eye on the Suggestions page. - Schreit mich an Caucasian ethnicities semites are caucasian. Or indeed not. See, for example, Semitic, which clearly indicates otherwise. They speak wildly different languages to those spoken by Indo-European people (who are the ones we normally call ""Caucasian""), so unless there's some startling new research out there, I don't think that comment is accurate. - Schreit mich an I'm not even going to dignify this with a response. [[Use

Content dispute Hi, I noticed that Chemtrail conspiracy theory was restricted over a content dispute. Can you please direct me to that conversation? I feel like I've walked into something the feels funny and I should find out what this dispute is over. Thank you.

Unban Go to hell, Android79! I do not consider my edits vandalism!

Welcome! Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: The five pillars of Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page How to write a great article Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on , or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Monoxide (party)

I am assuming that there is no point trying to explain to you mr bracket bot that I have no idea what that means. I copied and pasted and it seems to display if i remove stuff it may not display and since i have no idea why you would need brackets anyway I don't think its wise to remove but I'd be more than happy for you to take care of redundant brackets and may i say you are far too polite to be a human so in other worlds where you gain sentience i add may you and all sentient beings be happy and discover the causes of happiness and feel free to remove brackets if you can do so without harm.

You would you would too You would Dirty boy.

" Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Luis Gonzalez (outfielder) with this edit. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. '''''' (TALK) "

Hellcats You can't unlink from those source formats.

I was wondering how do you change color in raw signatures?

Yamaguchi is a fake & paid PR of lakshmi manchu born on 8th october 1970 but pretends to be 16! Manchu is a joke & so are you yamaguchi ) Lol shut up & stop preaching and get lost u idiot!

" genes ""It encodes just four genes: the maturation protein (A-protein), the lysis protein, and the replicase protein."" That's the maturation protein (A-protein), the coat protein, the lysis protein, and the replicase protein. It would probably be worth mentioning that the replicase enzyme consists of the replicase protein plus 3 E. coli proteins, ribosomal protein S1, elongation factor Tu, & elongation factor Ts. 69.72.27.161 "

I will help. Would somebody please create (talk)

It's sloppy, visual distracting from the first sentence, and now is redundant. Just because some pages are sloppy and incomplete does not mean that this one should be, especially in this case.

{subst:prodwarning|Loosedemar|concern = Non-notable band that fails WP:BAND and has been marked as an orphan for over a year, as having notability concerns for over a year and as unreferenced for almost a year.}}

NO. What Kastle says is vandalism against the reputation of GOOD pianists... What I said had to be said. I shall definitely look at the process of getting an article deleted.

" Jesus Christ?! I don't know, maybe this is just a really crazy coincidence, but I've seen Jesus' name in the Hebrew (one version) translate as ""Yeshua Ha-Nasi (or Ha-Notsri/Ha-Nozri/Ha-Nosri)"", so Yeshua Ha-Nosri Judah haNasi Also, ""Yeshua"" is an old form of ""Joshua"". If anyone can tell me if I'm really wrong, and it's just a really weird coincidence (probably is, but...), please tell me. I'm at ."

Absolutely, use of that word is strongly misleading, even with '-like'. The structure had nothing to do with mastaba - a burial chamber basicly. Mastaba by definition has entran & ceinner space. This structure was one solid pile of rocks, with no inner space or entrances. It was ment as a wall fragment.

Thank you very much and i will not forget to add templates:).

How about some RELIABLE, sources that are LESS THAN 40 YEARS old?

Let the eternal wikipedia archives show that i stuck my pen1s into your fat sister's crabby vag1n@. that's the truth. fluck you.

Dude, You're the one in Trouble with Wik for Starting an Edit War! Just admit he's Hispanic and that you CHERRY-picked his dad's statements. Here's another legit source affirming his father's statements http://www.wftv.com/news/news/sanford-readies-travon-martin-rally-council-votes-/nLZZk/ PS Yes, you ARE a liberal. Liberals always deny what they are...lol 99.185.56.156

I really have no clue, and don't know much about the context in which you are asking the question. A more appropriate place to ask this would be at Wikipedia:Reference Desk, where Wikipedians can help you with non-Wikipedia-related questions. Hope this helps, (talk)

Hey Why the fuck would I vandalize my own article, dipshit? Keep your fucking jew-nose out of peoples goddamn business, got that asshole?

POV Tag Sorry, but there is just way too much content here from a single self-published source, Tim Field, without any other citations. This really needs to be checked for POV.

REDIRECT Talk:Riazuddin National Center for Physics

This article is a puff piece for Felix Rohatyn, a man many regard as a Nazi worm.

" Please do not remove all content from pages without explanation, as you did to Floyd Mayweather, Jr.. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Jwesley78 "

I admire you for speaking out on this sort of abuse, actually. 161.55.204.162 So do I. One of Wikipedia's dirty little secrets is the fact that the admins here don't just think that they own certain articles, they actually do own them. Forget about trying to stand up to them because they all cover for each other. 161.55.204.3

wah wah Why not tell that communist faggot Jeffrey to fuck off and quit being a shit face?

Joehazelton and a Humble question My humble Wikiquestion is - are editors even held accountable for libel or slander, as in real life, considering the reach and readership of Wikipedia. What checks and balances are in place for rogue editor & admin, sophisticated in the policies, but manipulating said polices to achieve the same results. In reading and researching, it would appear that many Editors and Admins, are behaving, contrary to the lofty goals of the Wikiproject, in order to forward personal or political agenda. Also what evidence is necessary to prove and rebuke and discipline such editors and Admin that are consistently and repeatedly violating 3RR and NPOV policy, if not in name, but certainly in sprit and in fact accuse other editors, who perform legitimate edits for the very thing that these rouges are engaged in? Is what Wikipdia critics say is true, in that Wikipdia is the play ground of the faceless and nameless, who are not beholding or accountable to the rule of law or is Wikipdia truly has respected place, with proper review, oversight or accountability for actions, contrary to stated and publish policy? My experance, so far, with due respect, would be the first, rather then the later. Humbly submitted and expecting the gods to block me do to my question of what is right or wrong. In closing, be warned that if a thing is abuse so much, and hurts to many people, truly hurts them, then there will be back lash and a noble project will die.

Images Maybe usefull image.