Datasets:

Intuit-GenSRF

/

combined_toxicity_profanity_v2_eval_only

like 0

this sort of information in this article? For Canadian National Railway and Canadian Pacific Railway we've resisted having the roster in the article, but VIA Rail might be different because (a) its locomotive count is in the dozens, not the thousands and (b) it's a bit easier to compile a complete roster since VIA's under 30 years old. I'm ki

" (UTC) Responding to ""holy hell"" above: Hi, I'm one of the OnTheIssues editors, so I'll cite some counter-evidence, as suggests. First, the basis of the website is the VoteMatch quiz (I'll be adding a paragraph about that next weekend for the Notability discussion) that is based on a Libertarian Party favorite called the Nolan Chart. Unlike the Nolan Chart, which is arranged as a [[push poll] to promote libertarianism, we arrange VoteMatch so that conservatives and liberals have the same number of ""yes"" answers. Furthermore, if you look at who OnTheIssues covers, it scrupulously includes liberals, conservatives, libertarians, greens, and far more right-leaning AND left-leaning candidates than the mainstream press does. FYI, I get incoming email accusing OnTheIssues of being left-leaning about as often as an accusation of being right-leaning. My response is always to challenge the write to find better coverage of right-leaning candidates on Fox News, or to find better coverage of left-leaning candidates on CNN the mainstream media on BOTH sides cover their OWN candidates' issue stances less than OnTheIssues does! If that's ""leaning"", then I guess OnTheIssues leans but I'd call it ""good journalism!"" 23:08, 4 March 2014"

" Scorers listed in the table should be ranked alphabetically based on ties. The team name should not be used when a flag icon will do just fine. As for those outside the top 10, they should be lumped all together with flagicons used again and only be seperated by goals scored. That is the way every other article is done. .Alpaugh "

I did NOT attack you personally. I did NOT violate any policy. That is a figment of your imagination. I attacked the country of France. Now, back to the article. You keep telling me to focus on the article but neither you, or have explained why the rumour, which is the subject of this tread, should be on the Rumsfeld Wikipedia page. As far as I can tell I have asked both of you for your input on that topic at least two times each and I haven't got a respond to that topic yet. I have received is a lecture from explaining his personal opinion that I should refer to Kerry is a Loser and from about logical fallacy of my argument. But I haven't heard one comment from either one of you on the actual topic of discussion which is the rumour listed about about Rumsfeld. I will repeat. Remember you really shouldn't lecture someone about sticking to the facts at hand unless you yourself actually comment on the facts at hand, which you haven't done yet. Unless there is some evidence provided for the Rumsfeld rumour then it will NOT go into the article and if anyone puts it in the article then I will rip it out.- 17:33, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Amazing, thank you very much! @

Zeal, Sir VG, and S3 2007

Paedophilia within Islam sanctioned by Muhammad Since Muhammad married a 6-year-old girl and had sex with her when she was 9, I was just wondering if peadophilia was still legal in Islam following Muhammad's example? Either it is, or it isn't, and both would be worthy of mention in this article.

See history of Iqbal. See how many times I have asked him to discuss and how many times he reverted without any valid resposnse. By the way, he has full support of Indian Admins, therefore, it is not easy to deter him.

YOU SUCK PERIODE AND YOU SHOULD HAVE YOUR HARTE PULLED OUT YOU SUCK YOU ARE VERY DUM DUMMER THAN Peter Griffin

Re-write I am planning a pretty big re-write here. The King's reign section headings installed today are temporary while I assemble information chronologically and still keep the page readable. When I've done that I plan to sub-divide them into larger dynastic and architectural sections. Its going to be quite a big job and eventually a long page, but I want the page to stay looking like a page as I do it. All advice/help welcome

I've added maps for both series 1-3 and 4-6. The original descriptions were written by me before I registered as a user and I don't think they're that bad!

" Lead section The consensus is that the lead section needs to be shortened (see #Proposed intro) even though I disagree with the others on the degree of shortening. Please stop adding text to the lead section! Some text I removed/modified: ""is a state that is composed of the island groups of Taiwan, the Pescadores, Kinmen, and Matsu."" > ""is a state that currently has jurisdiction over the island groups of Taiwan, the Pescadores, Kinmen, and Matsu."" This is inspired by the proposal above. The former adheres to Chenism and is POV. Whether the ROC=Taiwan is subject to debate. I don't see how the latter can be disputed. ""Some people view the current ROC that exists on Taiwan as the continuation of the ROC state that from 1912 to 1949 exercised sovereignty over all of China. Others view the state on Taiwan as existing separately from Republican China."" > ""From 1912 to 1949 the ROC encompassed all of China."" Wikipedia:Avoid weasel words. who are these ""some people"" and ""others""? The sentence is too ambiguous to be useful. Again, I don't see how the latter shorter wording is POV or inaccurate. ""modern Republic of China"" > ""existing Republic of China"". ""existing"" is less ambiguous than ""modern"". when does ""modern"" begin? It also smacks less against the PRC's version of events. ""warlordism"" > ""warlordism"". why the dewikification? the link is relevant. removed ""which had been reclaimed from Japan in 1945"". this is not an article on Japan. space is limited. why does this belong in the lead? This is in the history section. ""the KMT set up what it called a provisional capital in Taipei"" > ""the KMT declared Taipei the provisional capital"". the latter is much shorter. the POV of regarding Taipei a provisional capital is alleviated by using the word ""declare"". The KMT declared. That is not disputed, even not by the PRC. ""the Communi

sts proclaimed the People's Republic of China and claimed to have succeeded the ROC as China and that the Nationalist government in Taiwan was an illegitimate representative of China."" > ""the Communists proclaimed the People's Republic of China and claimed to have succeeded the ROC over all of China and that the ROC government in Taiwan was an illegitimate government."" The PRC not only disputed the KMT as a representative of China in intl organizations and elsewhere. It disputed the very existence of the ROC and its very legitimacy. The former is misleading and wrong. Removed ""While the tense standoff of the Cold War era has largely subsided"". Text formerly here about battles is gone. this clause is no longer necessary Removed ""on both sides of the Taiwan Strait"". Redundant. It is contentious everywhere (in the realm of international relations etc). and this is too obvious since these are the two sides in contention. Removed ""and one of the original five Security Council members"". removed in the interests of brevity. keep this in the foreign relations section. a mention of the UN membership is enough. ""Most major countries now recognize the PRC as having succeeded the ROC as the representative of China"" > ""Most countries switched their recognition from the ROC to the PRC in the 1970s"" The former is wrong. These countries have established formal relations of the PRC, but merely ""acknowledged"" the PRC's claims over Taiwan. They have not ""recognized"" Taiwan as a province of the PRC and conduct de facto relations, treating Taiwan as if it were seperate. ""recognized by 25 countries"" > ""recognized by 25 states"" ""states"" is more accurate. "

State of the Nation is not only about the Phillipines you damn bastards Russia and a handful of other countries have a State of the Nation as well. Too bad you smelly Filipinos are too ignorant to notice. Man if I was Hirohito I would've treated you brown chinks more seriously. November 3, 2006, WaWa12

" ...so do you intend on taking any of your concerns to the article's talk page? (talk/contribs) "

Good to hear from someone in the know. What you're saying tallies with the information in the Christian Science article. Since there is no (incorrect) claim of being human/naturalist science and/or the use of the scientific method, this is not pseudoscience. Actually I removed the cat yesterday since the article itself does not quote any sources, let alone a majority view, calling CS pseudoscience. By the way, although some editors brought this up here, (further) discussion should take place on the relevant talk page.  ÷ talk

Vandalism is a way to be one of the devil. Who agree that no could edit a page unless they are involved or living there? Somebody is warning me against reverting. I reverted all his works because all that he edited will be come the source of information for the true natives is being removed by a user named Xeltran.. Oppps sorry i mentioned tghe name of that user... i thought he was not a native from calamba or even a native of the philippines he was an alien.

"Perhaps I hope you have already read this while contributing to Wikipedia: ""When two editors disagree over what to do with an article, they must talk things through politely and rationally."" That's how I wanted this to go down. Yet your reports and mistakening word choice didn't exactly make it possible to be that way. "

It's not terribly useful anyway as it only shows the first bar of the break. (The rhythm changes near the end of the break.)

" March 2010 (continued) Some of your recent edits do not seem to have been constructive. For example, in Luis-Mary you replaced ""Zyeno"" with ""Zeyno"". You gave no explanation for this change, and no reason is evident. What is more, the existing form ""Zyeno"" is supported both by sources cited in the article and by other sources. Please do not remove or modify sourced material unless you have a good reason to do so, and in that case please explain that reason. "

That may be, but keep them so people can still look at the genres if they wish. This was only to disencourage edit wars, which it has.

" Eighth, I will try to split the difference by changing my username to ""lunarmoonbatssuck."""

You're invited to Wikipedia Takes St. Louis! I conjecture that you have some connection with St. Louis based on your editing history. Please dismiss if this premise is incorrect. Dust off your Polaroid camera and show off that inner photographer in you. The first-ever Wikipedia Takes St. Louisphoto hunt kicks off Sat, Sept. 15, around noon in downtown St. Louis. Tour the streets of the Rome of the West with other Wikipedians and even learn a little St. Louis history. This event is a fun and collaborative way to enhance St. Louis articles with visual content. Novice photographers welcome!

" Indeed, I admit I was a bit too edit-warry there and I shouldn't have. / I guess when certain editors are determined to make this project into a warzone, it's just too tempting to give in and war against them. "

" Welcome to the real world, I have never wanted to attack others but some users ""Legalos"" makes himself supreme ruler and a not-it-all. I am here to improve articles and perhaps make some friend, but not all of us are friends some are enemies. As you can see I am been called Dance-pop which I am not, how is this civil or even repectful. By the I could be older then you. You don't know. And you should mind your own business, if Legalos has a problem you should send me message on my talk page, not be snaky and coward by coming to you or you defending him, this ""cyber-like bullying"" is unacceptable. So do not come to me like a ""child"" (by the way that was metophoricalsplet wrong) ""telling"" me not do something in your opinion. "

"Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! I'm Rock drum, one of the thousands of editors here at Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:   Introduction  5    The five pillars of Wikipedia   How to edit a page   Help   Tips   How to write a great article   Manual of Style   Fun stuff... If you'd like to be mentored by a more experienced member of our community, go and visit Adopt-a-user where someone will guide you on your way. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please remember to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you want to try out an edit, please do so either at the main sandbox or . If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page (this page) and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  —  drum Ba-dum "

"Oh my god!! You did this much vandalism?! 777 "

" WP:AIRPORTS is neither here nor there with this issue, so lets not flog that horse again! The relevant guidelines are WP:LEAD and Wikipedia:Naming conventions (use English)#Include alternatives. A useful quote from the former: ""If there is a significant number of alternative names or forms it may be helpful to keep only the most common two or three in the first paragraph and a list of them in a separate section or footnote to avoid cluttering the lead; see Freyr for an example of this."" I do not think we should only have the alt names in the infobox. Thanks/ "

"Thank you for experimenting with the page User:VanessaLuver4Ever on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. "

to look over repeatedly

Well they are certainly prettier than you Siddiqui ugly faces. I suggest you keep it that way. Certainly gives a much better impression then you miserable Siddiquis. As far as I can see you are the biggest intellectual dishonest here judging by all the comments on your talk.

" Cheerz! You'll see the review is very short, there's not many changes to do. And of what there is, nothing is major. =) | talk2me''' "

The guy who thinks he is secretly a bunny rabbit is insulting me. Wow.

Nonsense ( But I want them to unite D I am sorry I dont know Russian, not yet anyway ;) I am from Sweden. Schools here are free, but to study Russian at an uni level is no joke so I dont know if I want to do that AND to study what I am allready studying which is math but I will most likely jump to physics. And nice seeing you to ;) ( )

YOU ARE ONE SAD LITTLE INDIVIDUAL.

Ping Replied on my talk page.

I've reworked the intro of the article and added the proper tags to the references. I did not read the entire article looking for errors, but I fixed the ones I caught as I corrected the references. I've decided that I'm going to work section by section. Can you critique my work so far?

User talk:Hesperian; Did anyone ask for your opinion. It would seem that Wackipedia is run along similar lines to NAZI Germany.

Please do not remove messages from your talk page. Talk pages exist as a record of communication, and in any case, comments are available through the page history. You're welcome to archive your talk page, but be sure to provide a link to any deleted comments. Thanks. ~ TC Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia by creating the page Alistair hendry. Your test worked, and has been or will soon be removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. ~ TC

While I did say there is no deadline, I was wondering if you intend to finish this review. It's fine if you would like to pass it on to someone else, I would just prefer that it doesn't stay in on hold limbo indefinitely. Thanks for your efforts so far. Talk to me!

San Diego Zoo Great job cleaning up the San Diego Zoo article! Thanks for doing that!

I'll stop changing Michaels as soon as you guys stop adding this POV crap to drivers that aren't fit to change his tires.

Paul Kelly Yes you are right. When I get time I will seek out sources for Mary-Jo Kelly and Lazare Agneskis. Part of the long history of Kelly related musicians!

Is dat sum hermaphrodite? lolololololololollololololololllolololololololololo

Too much Too much excess information; wikipedia is not a game guide.

See also: Wikipedia:WikiProject Tango

" Enjoy! has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing! Smile at others by adding to their talk page with a friendly message. ."

Mark Rich Connection Details on Marc Rich need to be clarified. He was indicted by US and left the US in 1983, well before the sandstorm report.

Okay, I'm sorry I reacted so hastely toward you my freind, please consider that I'm a fat pig that sits at home and jacksoff with a picture of Judge Judy, and i weight 300 lbs. Sorry Mister.

as having done this, to my knowledge

Vegeta, what does the scouter say about his power level?

ONCE AGAIN JD UK IS A FUCKING FAGGOT FUCKER WHO DESERVES TO BE BEATEN WIT DA UGLY STICK

Not an attack, just the facts Dear Sir, Please, go to QRZ.COM and look up AA4AN and you will see Tim Gaines, Gaines is not his real last name. His real last time is listed. Not an attack sir, just the facts. Now, please, revert my listing. As for not seeing, QRZ.COM doesn't allow for hotlinking to it's database. I had forgotten about that. Further more, here is link to an interview, where Tim Gaines says he is a Amateur Radio Operator, he gives his old call and when he moved, he changed it. If you go to QRZ.COM and click on the detail tab, you will see the history of his calls at the bottom. I know these things, because I am an amateur radio operator. I know these things, because I am also an Amateur Radio operator. My call is K8CPA and you can look me up as well. ) Many Thanks. -Chuck Adkins

" Greetings... ...fellow Wikipedian! I come to you with a request for a favour. You see, my friend - talk "

Kwami participated and even initiated personal attacks as well as the vandalistic deletion of material not his own. 133.7.7.240

Randolph's real name is Charles Satterfield and he is very clear a psychopath.

" Finally a relevant piece of info. First, ""seem"" (a weasel word meaning ""seem according to my POV and finite knowledge"") is not the same as ""is"". And how am I supposed to know or CARE about your lay ""Kurgan Theory""/""Pontic-Caspian homeland"" wikiconfusion? I really don't care about your internal politics cuz I have a life. Did you think users should? Oh dear. This is exactly how shitburglarz WP has become and why I only casually edit here from time to time for kicks and to shake up the retards who believe a lot of the false crap on here. You all will make up rules and policies among your lonely selves and expect people to read a 12500-page ramble on everything. Ever seen the movie Brazil? It looks like a lot like WP. Bureaucracy hell. LOL."

Because it's common name for that mountains ranges in Japan 61.215.99.250

AWB question Hi Thiseye. Today your AWB robot changed the code for Ø (Ø) to the letter Ø. Can everybody then read the letter now? On my office computer, Chinese 'letters' are just small squares and sanskrit are vertical lines. Does the Scandinavian letters Æ, Ø and Å show up on your screen? (Æ, Ø and Å) (I'm not interested in directions in getting my browser to read Chinese letters)

AGE? If she was born in 1975 and ET came out in 1982 how could her first acting job be when she was 11?

" Student encyclopedia Hello again. I am the Alexandria Agriculture college student who asked about making ""wikipedia-like"" websites in the previous archive. I have talked to our college's chief minister, and he agreed with the idea. I was wondering if you are interested in helping us starting it. The reason i am asking you, is that you have already done that before with ClueNet, and we would be very grateful to get some help. Thanks in advance. ('' "

What is wrong with you ??? Why are you following me around Wikipedia deleting links ???!

Two things. When I look at the article, I in fact do see one side to the Democratic Party Phrase, which is the negative. I agree that the article should support the positive and the negative of the Democratic Party Phrase. Although it is well researched and well cited, I only see one view. I don't see it as being neutral. Unless im not seeing something.

" Actually, no, becuase your inputs were never sarcastic, just brutally honest. Thanks also for your kind words about this discussion and how silly it was in comparison to things. I am having a slight issue with both of the people who started the AfDs now appearing to be against me on this discussion. Almost as if they were following my edits. But, this I cannot prove and I seem to be losing this fight. People don't seem to get that posting on Wikipedia ""I am fearful of my life"" is extremely serious. I could have been banned forever and Morwen should never have posted such an untrue thing. I could take a half a dozen comments from talk pages and say they sound like threats. But never would I tell another use I was in fear of my life unless it was an honest, real, legitimate threat. Thanks again for your inputs. They are actually appreciated - "

" edit conflict Wikipedia is the place to right the wrongs that Wikipedia inflicts when it is wielded to harm blameless people. Furthermore, as I said in my talk for the University of Southampton, ""When you’re discussing a matter with the armies of Mordor, Wikipedia is a battleground when they tell you it’s a battleground."" "

Welcome! Hello, Spysspy, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: The five pillars of Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page and How to develop articles How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish) Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!

Heyo! Obese boy if u can make it to 2009 (that heart struggling amongst all the girth) I'd say there is a such thing as magic. Enjoy this > . Thinking about creating you a nice my space with your picture. Before will be yours, after will be the pic of the walrus By the way, I WONDER WHAT WOULD HAPPEN IF U POURED SOME BARBECUE SAUCE ON CKATZ. WOULD U GUYS STILL BE FRIENDS. DOUBTLESSLY HE'D be seeing the inside of your digestive system 143.235.209.240

" Request to get 2015–16 Heart of Midlothian F.C. season & User:Blethering Scot/WikiProject Football/Scotland task force deleted & . It is ridiculous to refuse this request. I fully intend to fight this in every way possible & I mean anyway possible. Wikipedia is a joke that just doesn't care about content, it cares about protecting itself and editors like Scot "

Your involvement may be most helpful if you can just watch over what he does to ensure he is actually discussing what he desires rather than act like a bull in a china shop without listening to others. His unilateral actions like declaring that various programs, including “Cobalt”, be deleted from Wikipedia and from the list isn’t exactly an unheard-of sorta thing on Wikipedia. However his single-handedly declaring how things must be done by posting an announcement on the talk page with the section heading “Removed and Banned entries” and his tenacity over the months on “Cobalt” suggests he A) might have a singular focus, and B) might need help to understand the art of collaborative writing on en.Wikipedia.This matter is probably more about the procedure of doing things rather than concerning oneself with the nuts and bolts of CAD. However, turning one’s to “80,”, it’s clear that with people like Burt Rutan of Scaled Composites designing space ships like SpaceShipOne using Cobalt, the program is clearly notable.

" Sure, thanks -) Guess that's just how seriously screwed our society is. eybaná "

cheSTOP ADDING IN SHIT ONLY TO SUPPORT YOUR FUCKING POLITICAL VIEWS. YOUR ADDITIONS ONTO WIKIPEDIA ARE UNINTELLECTUAL, BIASED, AND ARE ONLY ADDED TO MISINFORM AND MANIPULATE PEOPLE INTO THINKING THAT EVERYTHING THE REPUBLICAN PARTY DOES IS DERIVED FROMT HE MOUTH OF GOD. YOU FUCKING PIECE OF NIGGER SHIT. EITHER ADD CONSTRUCTIVE EDITS THAT USE REAL SOURCES OR STAY THE FUCK OFF OF WIKIPEDIA. WOULD YOU LIKE SOMEONE EDITING THE GEORGE BUSH PAGE WITH COMMENTS FROM MICHAEL MOORE OR KEITH OLBERMAN? NO YOU WOULDNT. SO SHOW SOME RESPECT AND KEEP YOUR POLITICAL SHIT OFF OF WIKIPEDIA. FUCK YOU, YOU UNITELLECTUAL PIECE OF GARBAGE SHIT. FUCK YOU NIGGER.ck

Indef block I believe you got a bum deal and should not give up. The admin cited a preponderance of evidence without stating at all what that evidence was. The CU is not mentioned regarding you and Minusjason, so that is not it, otherwise it would have been mentioned. Admins can be a high handed bunch, and they most likely blocked you for your incivility. They will not admit to it, but dislike of your vocal objections hardly will make any of them feel obliged. I would appeal and ask for a detailing of what evidence was regarded as compelling. If it's the similarities in edits, then their argument is weak, very weak. It is reasonable to assume that two different editors would agree and make similar edits. Unfortunately, there is a star chamber quality, meaning a huge lack of transparency involved, to how these judgements are issued, and they will not feel an obligation to explain themselves, and no admin can demand a better rational for how the block was decided. If you appeal, you will need to deal with the fact finding process, and leave out how idiotic admins can be at times, however obvious this may seem.

Hi Mihir. We all understand the complications you're going through. As I said here, an unacceptable burden has been placed on the CAs to make this poorly designed program work. We can be lenient when it comes to writing style, poor English, etc. These issues can be fixed gradually through copyediting, although I have to say that in some cases the English so poor (often resulting from copying text verbatim and then attempting to change individual words or verb tenses, or removing one or two phrases from the sequence) that the text is incomprehensible. Only editors who are subject specialists can copyedit such articles, thus greatly reducing the pool of editors who can make the repairs. Here's an example. The student had had multiple copyvio problems before and asked me to look at the new draft. I could confirm that blatant copyvio doesn't seem to be there anymore, but I simply cannot understand the content enough to fix the English or even comment on its accuracy.However we cannot be lenient on copyright violation, ever. The scale of the problem is now so large that it's now going to take literally months (and many editors) to find and remove it from articles edited by IEP students. The silver lining to this cloud is that we'll probably find and get rid of a lot of other copy vio that didn't come from IEP students. Hardwired control is one example I found today. The whole article is basically copied from Computer architecture and organization by John Patrick Hayes, and has been like this since at least 2008. Best,

Are you an accused party? Just wondering why you choose this section.

Have you seen the reference to their claim, you moron?? This is not a source. It´s their POV. Once I have more time I will reduce your Pashtun nationalist POVs here on Wiki and give order to my uncles and cousins the execution of Pashtuns in the entire northern Afghanistan down to Gardez, Jalalabad, Lashkargah, Logar, Paghman, Laghman, Kunduz, Herat, Farah ... whereever immigrant descandants of violent Kuchis settled and took non-Pashtun lands away and traditional Tajik countries. When they have no clue about the percentages they write Pashtu, Dari and Uzbaki are spoken by 90%. So if they know that immigrant Pashtuns are in majority, why don´t they give any numbers? Why Kunduz province is dominated to 56% by Persian-speakers? Go take a visit to Kunduz and see it with your own eyes and listen with your own ears... but I can not tell you you will survive that as a Pashtun. 84.59.190.210 Also your other source need to be checked on it´s reference''. 84.59.190.210

Several years later, I finally add something to my talk page.

Jiang was a . This article is a disgrace. It covers up all of the man's evil deeds.

", 11 January 2012 (UTC) There is a vast body of work on this topic, called motivation crowding theory. The great news is that while the authorities on the subject have always said that monetary rewards can strengthen intrinsic motivation under some conditions, recent work suggests that those conditions have become far more well understood. For example: ""intrinsic interest is actually higher under [pay for individual performance]"" Fang, M. and Gerhart, B. (2011) ""Does pay for performance diminish intrinsic interest?"" International Journal of Human Resource Management ""Median FRT [response time] was reduced from 90 to 70 days, a 22% reduction in the presence of payments. With payments, only 1% of the FRTs exceeded six months; without payments, 16% of the FRTs exceeded six months."" Thompson, G.D., et al. (2010) ""Does Paying Referees Expedite Reviews? Results of a Natural Experiment"" Economic Journal 76(3):678-92 ""monetary payments as well as intrinsic motivation have roles in the real-life decision to supply volunteer work, but monetary rewards do not crowd out intrinsic motivation"" Fiorillo, D. (2011) ""Do monetary rewards crowding intrinsic motivations of volunteers? Some empirical evidence for Italian volunteers"" Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics 82(2):139–65 21:17"

Dont really like the liberals either, Too much lefty rubbish leaves us all poor.

Vandilism Thanks, from now on no more vandilism for me. Thanks a million man!!!

" I have read this entire section carefully. The problem was with the (b) claim. Vlah is an racist word to describe a Serb, i sourced this claim. That is why i was asking for the user to source his claim that ""Vlah was an umbrella term to describe Serbs"". I know it will take a lot of time, and effort, but please state all objections to the questions that were written at the beginning of the section ""Outside comments"" by User:Future Perfect at Sunrise. Afterwards: 1. Can we agree that the last revision was an improvment and should be reinstated? http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Serbs_of_Croatia&diff;=198582584&oldid;=198570352 2. Are there any other reasons why the revisions may seem unfair to people? Lastly, I know that this article will be fail, informative and greatly presented if we work on it together. Also, thank to the admins who took the time to help us resolve the last dispute. "

Believe me, I would love to contribute to this system, but my first experience has not been a pleasant one. My first impression is seeing wikipedia as a dictatorship. Thanks

Don't make edits as if the article was moved. The title hasn't changed yet, so stop editing until the move is done (if its not moved then don't edit it).

":That ""eight"" and ""co-pilot"" were added in the edit in #Hoodwinked by a vandal? below. They were vandalism too. "

Please stop edit warring. I have tried to keep your legitimate additions, but your section on genetics is wholly inappropriate for the reasons given above.

(PS: I use Scroogle every day.)

You just don't get it do you? How hard does it have to be, you leave me alone. You are being reported for harrassment.

We were approved an hour ago.

Your ATT poll vote Hi Bill, I just wanted to be sure you wanted to cast your vote in the 'neutral' section, because this is where it is right now. If you want to vote 'support' (as in broad support of the ATT merger), your vote should be moved to the Support section. Thanks,

Naveen Dankal I have made a mental note of the points described by you about the way of doing articles on wiki....Thanks.Also I guess you are right about the time stamp..maybe I may have kept the article in sandbox only for a day or less and may have shown a bit of a hurry at my end in posting the stuff.

Sure, we can do that. You can go ahead and edit the article Swedish, French, Italian women. I think it is more of a regional thing that everybody around Georgia thinks that Georgian women are pretty. I don;t think that statement makes that much of a differece or requires that much of a discussion. I am sure we can cite it using on of the travel guides to Georgia.

"""Buzzards gots to eat, same as the worms."" "

Addendum: I've emailed my concerns regarding the edits by Elainiea Constantine to the oversight team. 88.104.31.21

99 out of 100 articles tagged within moments of creation would have been speedy delete candidates an hour later. It is that 100th article and its creator that not tagging hastily addresses most importantly. It also has a drama-reducing secondary effect even for some of the 99 because some, who would not have said anything when their non-notable subject is deleted when it can be assessed, will squawk if it's deleted before that assessment could have been made. In either case, we don't know what people will write until they write it. We do get valid COI vanity articles. Yes, they are rare, but the point is that there's no benefit in tagging empty articles moments after creation and many reasons not to do so which has been discussed many times at WT:CSD, memorialized in footnotes at the criteria, and is highlighted in a few ways at the top of newpages.

COTW Project You voted for Male and Female, this week's Collaborations of the week. Please come and help them become featured-standard articles. | (talk)

Genre The songs that have been realeased don't sound like Glam metal, so I don't know why it says Glam metal. It should say 'Hard rock, heavy metal' not 'Glam metal, hard rock.'

Please write to me about this issue on the article's talk page, not here. It's not a personal issue. Consensus determined that the TV show is the primary usage, and I think that's right. Really, the vast majority of uses will be for the show. (Some will be for the character Buffy Summers, but readers ending up at the TV show article instead are not hugely inconvenienced I think). The point is though that Buffy the Vampire Slayer has to be either the primary topic or a dab page, it shouldn't be a redirect to the primary topic! The guidelines are perfectly clear on this. Just about the only exception is when an article is primary topic for two or more phrases (The KLF, KLF); in such cases one of those has to be a redirect and the dab template is used in the main article instead of something like .

" Colossus printed out the current count only if it exceeded the ""set total"". There was also a feature for suspending counting and incrementing of the key sequence circuits if a second count needed to be printed before the printer had finished. These are both quite clearly conditional branching. The Atanasoff-Berry Computer is usually described as being designed only for the solution of systems of linear equations. Colossus, on the other hand, could perform a wide variety of tasks to help with decrypting Tunny messages. These ranged from implementing ""Tutte's 1+2 break-in"" to performing a frequency count of the characters in a ""delta de-chi"". "

Finite State Machine Logic.svg

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Outwood, West Yorkshire. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. (talk|contribs)