{ "0": { "webcast_id": "3634516_03112021", "hearing_date": "2021-11-03 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "L.B. v. Hungary (no. 36345\/16)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "36345\/16", "case_id": "001-223675", "case_name": "CASE OF L.B. v. HUNGARY", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-223675", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2023-03-09 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Act no. XCII of 2003 on Tax Administration ; 2006 amendment of the 2003 Tax Administration Act ; Section 26 (2) of the Constitutional Court Act ; Act CXII of 2011 in the right to informational self-determination and freedom of information ; Act no. CL of 2017 (2017 Tax Administration Act)", "represented_by": "KISS D. ; KARSAI D.", "respondent": "HUN", "articles": "35;35-3-a;8;8-1;8-2;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "A. v. Norway, no. 28070\/06, \u00a7 64, 9 April 2009;Alkaya v. Turkey, no. 42811\/06, 9 October 2012;Anchev v. Bulgaria (dec.), nos. 38334\/08 and 68242\/16, 5 December 2017;Animal Defenders International v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 48876\/08, ECHR 2013;Armonien\u0117 v. Lithuania, no. 36919\/02, \u00a7 42, 25 November 2008;Axel Springer AG v. Germany [GC], no. 39954\/08, 7 February 2012;Big Brother Watch and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 58170\/13 and 2 others, 25 May 2021;Biriuk v. Lithuania, no. 23373\/03, \u00a7 43, 25 November 2008;Cemalettin Canl\u0131 v. Turkey, no. 22427\/04, 18 November 2008;Centrum f\u00f6r r\u00e4ttvisa v. Sweden [GC], no. 35252\/08, \u00a7 151, 25 May 2021;Correia de Matos v. Portugal [GC], no. 56402\/12, \u00a7 117, 4 April 2018;Delfi AS v. Estonia [GC], no. 64569\/09, ECHR 2015;Denis and Irvine v. Belgium [GC], nos. 62819\/17 and 63921\/17, \u00a7 98, 1 June 2021;Editorial Board of Pravoye Delo and Shtekel v. Ukraine, no. 33014\/05, \u00a7 63, ECHR 2011 (extracts);G.S.B. v. Switzerland, no. 28601\/11, \u00a7 93, 22 December 2015;Karabeyo\u011flu v. Turkey, no. 30083\/10, \u00a7 118, 7 June 2016;Khadija Ismayilova v. Azerbaijan, nos. 65286\/13 and 57270\/14, \u00a7 147-49, 10 January 2019;Khelili v. Switzerland, no. 16188\/07, \u00a7 64, 18 October 2011;L.B. v. Hungary, no. 36345\/16, \u00a7 16, 12 January 2021;Leki\u0107 v. Slovenia [GC], no. 36480\/07, \u00a7 108, 11 December 2018;Leyla \u015eahin v. Turkey [GC], no. 44774\/98, \u00a7 99, ECHR 2005-XI;Lustig-Prean and Beckett v. the United Kingdom, nos. 31417\/96 and 32377\/96, \u00a7 82, 27 September 1999;M.A. v. Denmark [GC], no. 6697\/18, 9 July 2021;M.L. and W.W. v. Germany, nos. 60798\/10 and 65599\/10, \u00a7\u00a7 99 and 106, 28 June 2018;M.S. v. Sweden, 27 August 1997, Reports 1997 I;Magyar Tartalomszolg\u00e1ltat\u00f3k Egyes\u00fclete and Index.hu Zrt v. Hungary, no. 22947\/13, 2 February 2016;Mendrei v. Hungary (dec.), no. 54927\/15, 19 June 2018;Merabishvili v. Georgia [GC], no. 72508\/13, \u00a7 297, 28 November 2017;O\u2019Keeffe v. Ireland [GC], no. 35810\/09, \u00a7 199, ECHR 2014;Parrillo v. Italy [GC], no. 46470\/11, \u00a7 163, ECHR 2015;Petkov and Others v. Bulgaria (dec.), nos. 77568\/01, 178\/02 and 505\/02, 4 December 2007;Pfeifer v. Austria, no. 12556\/03, \u00a7 35, 15 November 2007;Pihl v. Sweden (dec.), no. 74742\/14, 7 February 2017;Rotaru v. Romania [GC], no. 28341\/95, \u00a7 44, ECHR 2000 V;S. and Marper v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 30562\/04 and 30566\/04, ECHR 2008;S.H. and Others v. Austria [GC], no. 57813\/00, \u00a7 97, ECHR 2011;S.M. v. Croatia [GC], no. 60561\/14, \u00a7\u00a7 216-19, 25 June 2020;Samoylova v. Russia, no. 49108\/11, \u00a7\u00a7 100-01, 14 December 2021;Satakunnan Markkinap\u00f6rssi Oy and Satamedia Oy v. Finland [GC], no. 931\/13, 27 June 2017;Sidabras and D\u017eiautas v. Lithuania, nos. 55480\/00 and 59330\/00, ECHR 2004 VIII;Sinan I\u015f\u0131k v. Turkey, no. 21924\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 42-53, ECHR 2010;S\u00f5ro v. Estonia, no. 22588\/08, \u00a7 62, 3 September 2015;Strand Lobben and Others v. Norway [GC], no. 37283\/13, \u00a7 211, 10 September 2019;Surikov v. Ukraine, no. 42788\/06, \u00a7 89, 26 January 2017;Vav\u0159i\u010dka and Others v. the Czech Republic [GC], nos. 47621\/13 and 5 others, \u00a7 273, 8 April 2021;Vukota-Boji\u0107 v. Switzerland, no. 61838\/10, \u00a7 52, 18 October 2016;W\u0119grzynowski and Smolczewski v. Poland, no. 33846\/07, \u00a7 58, 16 July 2013;White v. Sweden, no. 42435\/02, \u00a7 26, 19 September 2006;Z v. Finland, 25 February 1997, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997 I;\u017ddanoka v. Latvia [GC], no. 58278\/00, \u00a7\u00a7 112-15, ECHR 2006 IV", "external_sources": "Sections 5 (b), (c), (d) and (e) of the Council of Europe Convention for the Protection of Individuals with regard to Automatic Processing of Personal Data", "conclusion": "Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": null, "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0309JUD003634516" }, "1": { "webcast_id": "3634516_03112021", "hearing_date": "2021-11-03 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "L.B. v. Hungary (no. 36345\/16)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "36345\/16", "case_id": "001-207132", "case_name": "CASE OF L.B. v. HUNGARY", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-207132", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2021-01-12 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 3, "court": "7", "issue": "Section 55(3) and (5) of the Tax Administration Act ; Act CVII of 2011 on the right to informational self-determination of freedom and information (\u201cthe Data Protection Act\u201d)", "represented_by": "KISS D.B.", "respondent": "HUN", "articles": "8;8-1;8-2;35", "strasbourg_caselaw": "A.-M.V. v. Finland, no. 53251\/13, \u00a7 82, 23 March 2017;Alkaya v. Turkey, no. 42811\/06, 9 October 2012;Amann v. Switzerland [GC], no. 27798\/95, \u00a7 65, ECHR 2000 II;Animal Defenders International v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 48876\/08, \u00a7 110, ECHR 2013 (extracts);Axel Springer AG v. Germany [GC], no. 39954\/08, \u00a7 83, 7 February 2012;Delfi AS v. Estonia [GC], no. 64569\/09, \u00a7 117, ECHR 2015;Dickson v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 44362\/04, \u00a7 78, ECHR 2007 V;Dubsk\u00e1 and Krejzov\u00e1 v. the Czech Republic [GC], nos. 28859\/11 and 28473\/12, \u00a7 179, 15 November 2016;Egill Einarsson v. Iceland, no. 24703\/15, \u00a7 46, 7 November 2017;G.S.B. v. Switzerland, no. 28601\/11, \u00a7 90, 22 December 2015;James and Others v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1986, \u00a7 36, Series A no. 98;Leander v. Sweden, 26 March 1987, \u00a7 48, Series A no. 116;Lundvall v. Sweden, no. 10473\/83, Commission decision of 1 December 1985, Decisions and Reports (DR) 45, p. 131;M.L. and W.W. v. Germany, nos. 60798\/10 and 65599\/10, \u00a7 104, 28 June 2018;Magyar Helsinki Bizotts\u00e1g v. Hungary [GC], no. 18030\/11, \u00a7 194, 8 November 2016;Niemietz v. Germany, 16 December 1992, \u00a7 29, Series A no. 251 B;P.G. and J.H. v. the United Kingdom, no. 44787\/98, \u00a7 57, ECHR 2001 IX;Polyakh and Others v. Ukraine, nos. 58812\/15 and 4 others, \u00a7 293, 17 October 2019;Rotaru v. Romania [GC], no. 28341\/95, \u00a7 46, ECHR 2000 V;S. and Marper v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 30562\/04 and 30566\/04, ECHR 2008;S.H. and Others v. Austria [GC], no. 57813\/00, ECHR 2011).;\u0160antare and Labaz\u0146ikovs v. Latvia, no. 34148\/07, \u00a7 52, 31 March 2016;Satakunnan Markkinap\u00f6rssi Oy and Satamedia Oy v. Finland [GC], no. 931\/13, \u00a7\u00a7 136-37, 27 June 2017;Savva Terentyev v. Russia, no. 10692\/09, \u00a7 79, 28 August 2018;Smirnova v. Russia, nos. 46133\/99 and 48183\/99, \u00a7 95, ECHR 2003 IX (extracts);Stec and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 65731\/01 and 65900\/01, \u00a7 52, ECHR 2006 VI;Tiba v. Romania, no. 36188\/09, \u00a7 21, 13 December 2016;Vallianatos and Others v. Greece [GC], nos. 29381\/09 and 32684\/09, \u00a7 94, ECHR 2013 (extracts);Von Hannover v. Germany (no. 2) [GC], nos. 40660\/08 and 60641\/08, \u00a7 110, ECHR 2012;Vukota-Boji\u0107 v. Switzerland, no. 61838\/10, \u00a7 52, 18 October 2016", "external_sources": "Council of Europe Convention for the Protection of Individuals with regard to Automatic Processing of Personal Data (\u201cthe Data Protection Convention\u201d)", "conclusion": "Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Branko Lubarda;Carlo Ranzoni;Yonko Grozev;Georges Ravarani", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0112JUD003634516" }, "2": { "webcast_id": "3634516_03112021", "hearing_date": "2021-11-03 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "L.B. v. Hungary (no. 36345\/16)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "36345\/16", "case_id": "001-178642", "case_name": "L.B. v. HUNGARY", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-178642", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "", "respondent": "HUN", "articles": "8;8-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Communicated", "separate_opinion": "", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "3": { "webcast_id": "2438419_29092021", "hearing_date": "2021-09-29 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "H.F. and M.F. v. France and J.D. and A.D. v. France (nos. 24384\/19 and 44234\/20)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "24384\/19", "case_id": "001-219333", "case_name": "CASE OF H.F. AND OTHERS v. FRANCE", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-219333", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2022-09-14 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Inter-ministerial instruction no. 5995\/SG of 23 February 2018 on \u201cProvisions to be made for minors on their return from areas of terrorist group operations (in particular the Syria-Iraq border area)\u201d", "represented_by": "DOS\u00c9 M.", "respondent": "FRA", "articles": "1;34;35;35-3-a;41;46;46-2;P4-3;P4-3-2", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Abdi Ibrahim v. Norway [GC], no. 15379\/16, \u00a7 180, 10 December 2021;Abdul Wahab Khan v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 11987\/11, \u00a7\u00a7 27-28, 28 January 2014;Airey v. Ireland, 9 October 1979, \u00a7\u00a7 24-25, Series A no. 32;Al-Dulimi and Montana Management Inc. v. Switzerland [GC], no. 5809\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 134 and 145-146, 21 June 2016;Al-Nashif v. Bulgaria, no. 50963\/99, \u00a7 123, 20 June 2002;Al-Saadoon and Mufdhi v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 61498\/08, \u00a7 88, 30 June 2009;Al-Skeini and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 55721\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 131-142, ECHR 2011;Association \u201cRegele Mihai\u201d v. Romania, no. 26916\/95, Commission Decision of 4 September 1995;Association Innocence en Danger and Association Enfance et Partage v. France, nos. 15343\/15 and 16806\/15, \u00a7 130, 4 June 2020;Bankovi\u0107 and Others v. Belgium and Others (dec.) [GC], no. 52207\/99, \u00a7 59, ECHR 2001-XII;Beghal v. the United Kingdom, no. 4755\/16, \u00a7 88, 28 February 2019;Ble\u010di\u0107 v. Croatia [GC], no. 59532\/00, \u00a7 67, ECHR 2006 III;Budayeva and Others v. Russia, nos. 15339\/02 and 4 others, \u00a7\u00a7 134 and 135, ECHR 2008 (extracts);C.B. v. Germany, no. 22012\/93, Commission decision, 11 January 1994;Catan and Others v. the Republic of Moldova and Russia [GC], nos. 43370\/04 and 2 others, \u00a7 103, ECHR 2012 (extracts);Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin C\u00e2mpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 102, 103 and 110, ECHR 2014;Cyprus v. Turkey, Commission decision, \u00a7 8, 26 May 1975, no. 6780\/74;De Wilde, Ooms and Versyp v. Belgium (Article 50), 10 March 1972, \u00a7 22, Series A no. 14;Georgia v. Russia (II) [GC] (merits), no. 38263\/08, 21 January 2021;Ghoumid and Others v. France, nos. 52273\/16 and 4 others, 25 June 2020;Golder v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1975, \u00a7 26, Series A no. 18;Gray v. Germany, no. 49278\/09, 22 May 2014;Grz\u0119da v. Poland [GC], no. 43572\/18, \u00a7 342, 15 March 2022;G\u00fczelyurtlu and Others v. Cyprus and Turkey [GC], no. 36925\/07, 29 January 2019;Habsburg-Lothringen v. Austria, no. 15344\/89, Commission Decision, 14 December 1989;Hanan v. Germany [GC], no. 4871\/16, \u00a7\u00a7 133-142, 16 February 2021;Hashemi and Others v. Azerbaijan, nos. 1480\/16 and 6 others, \u00a7 47, 13 January 2022;Hassan and Others v. France, nos. 46695\/10 and 54588\/10, \u00a7 39, 4 December 2014;Hirsi Jamaa and Others v. Italy [GC], no. 27765\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 52 and 53, ECHR 2012;Janowiec and Others v. Russia [GC], nos. 55508\/07 and 29520\/09, \u00a7 213, ECHR 2013;K2 v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 42387\/13, 7 February 2017;Khan v. France, no. 12267\/16, \u00a7 74, 28 February 2019;Kurt v. Austria [GC], no. 62903\/15, \u00a7\u00a7 157 et seq., 15 June 2021;Lambert and Others v. France [GC], no. 46043\/14, ECHR 2015 (extracts);Leyla \u015eahin v. Turkey [GC], no. 44774\/98, \u00a7 152, ECHR 2005-XI;Lopes de Sousa Fernandes v. Portugal [GC], no. 56080\/13, \u00a7 216, 19 December 2017;M. and Others v. Italy and Bulgaria, no. 40020\/03, \u00a7 127, 31 July 2012;M.N. and Others v. Belgium (dec.) [GC], no. 3599\/18, 5 May 2020;Magyar Helsinki Bizotts\u00e1g v. Hungary [GC], no. 18030\/11, \u00a7\u00a7 118-125, 8 November 2016;Marangos v. Cyprus, no. 31106\/96, Commission decision of 20 May 1997;Marckx v. Belgium, 13 June 1979, \u00a7 31, Series A no. 31;Markovic and Others v. Italy [GC], no. 1398\/03, ECHR 2006-XIV;Mathieu-Mohin and Clerfayt v. Belgium, 2 March 1987, \u00a7 52, Series A no. 113;Mediterraneum joint venture and 10 other applications v. Italy (dec.), no. 351\/05, 29 April 2008;Medvedyev and Others v. France [GC], no. 3394\/03, \u00a7 81, ECHR 2010;Momcilovic v. Croatia (dec.), no. 59138\/00, 29 August 2002;Muhammad and Muhammad v. Romania [GC], no. 80982\/12, \u00a7\u00a7 122-201, 15 October 2020;N.D. and N.T. v. Spain [GC], nos. 8675\/15 and 8697\/15, \u00a7 171, 13 February 2020;Nada v. Switzerland [GC], no. 10593\/08, \u00a7 164, ECHR 2012;Naumov v. Albania (dec.), no. 10513\/03, 4 January 2005;Nessa and Others v. Finland (dec.), no. 31862\/02, 6 May 2003;Pi\u015fkin v. Turkey, no. 33399\/18, \u00a7 227, 15 December 2020;S. v. Germany, no. 11659\/85, Commission decision, 17 October 1986;Slivenko and Others v. Latvia (dec.) [GC], no. 48321\/99, \u00a7 77, ECHR 2002 II (extracts);Soering v. the United Kingdom, 7 July 1989, \u00a7 86, Series A no. 161;Tagayeva and Others v. Russia, nos. 26562\/07 and 6 others, \u00a7 481, 13 April 2017;Ukraine v. Russia (re Crimea) (dec.) [GC], nos. 20958\/14 and 38334\/18, \u00a7 344, 16 December 2020;Usmanov v. Russia, no. 43936\/18, \u00a7 54, 22 December 2020;Verein gegen Tierfabriken Schweiz (VgT) v. Switzerland (no. 2) [GC], no. 32772\/02, \u00a7 81, ECHR 2009;Victor-Emmanuel De Savoie v. Italy (striking out), no. 53360\/99, 24 April 2003;X and Others v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 22457\/16, \u00a7 182 and 197, 2 February 2021", "external_sources": "Article 12 \u00a7 4 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR);United Nations Human Rights Committee\u2019s (UNCCPR) General Comment no. 27 on the Freedom of Movement under Article 12 of the ICCPR, adopted on 1 November 1999 (UN Documents CCPR\/C\/21\/Rev.1\/Add.9);Article 19 of the International Law Commission (ILC) Draft Articles on Diplomatic Protection and commentary;Vienna Convention on Consular Relations adopted on 24 April 1963;Article 13 \u00a7 2 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights;Article 12 \u00a7 2 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples\u2019 Rights;Article 10 of the International Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC), adopted on 20 November 1989;Explanatory Report to Protocol No. 4 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, securing certain rights and freedoms other than those\nalready included in the Convention and in the first Protocol thereto (STE no. 46);Four Geneva Conventions of 1949;Rule 144 of the International Committee of the Red Cross study on Customary International Humanitarian Law;Report of the Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms while countering terrorism, following her visit to France from 14 to 23 May 2018 (A\/HRC\/40\/52\/Add.4, 8 May 2019);Council of Europe Parliamentary Assembly and Committee of Ministers (PACE) Recommendation 2169 (2020), entitled \u201cInternational obligations concerning the repatriation of children from war and conflict zones\u201d, adopted on 30 January 2020;Reply to Recommendation 2169, adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 8 December 2020 (at the 1391st meeting of the Ministers\u2019 Deputies);PACE Resolution 2321 (2020) adopted on 30 January 2020;PACE Committee on Social Affairs, Health and Sustainable Development Declaration adopted on 16 March 2021;European Parliament Resolution on the rights of the child (2019\/2876 (RSP)), adopted on 26 November 2019;European Parliament Resolution on the Syrian conflict \u2013 10 years after the uprising (2021\/2576 (RSP)), adopted on 11 March 2021\n", "conclusion": "Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Locus standi;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione loci;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione personae;Violation of Article 3 of Protocol No. 4 - Prohibition of expulsion of nationals (Article 3 para. 2 of Protocol No. 4 - Enter own country);Respondent State to take individual measures (Article 46-2 - Individual measures);Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Ganna Yudkivska;Jon Fridrik Kj\u00f8lbro;Krzysztof Wojtyczek;M\u0101rti\u0146\u0161 Mits;Robert Spano;S\u00edofra O'Leary;St\u00e9phanie Mourou-Vikstr\u00f6m;Yonko Grozev;Georges Ravarani;Ksenija Turkovi\u0107;Lorraine Schembri Orland", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0914JUD002438419" }, "4": { "webcast_id": "2438419_29092021", "hearing_date": "2021-09-29 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "H.F. and M.F. v. France and J.D. and A.D. v. France (nos. 24384\/19 and 44234\/20)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "44234\/20", "case_id": "001-219333", "case_name": "CASE OF H.F. AND OTHERS v. FRANCE", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-219333", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2022-09-14 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Inter-ministerial instruction no. 5995\/SG of 23 February 2018 on \u201cProvisions to be made for minors on their return from areas of terrorist group operations (in particular the Syria-Iraq border area)\u201d", "represented_by": "DOS\u00c9 M.", "respondent": "FRA", "articles": "1;34;35;35-3-a;41;46;46-2;P4-3;P4-3-2", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Abdi Ibrahim v. Norway [GC], no. 15379\/16, \u00a7 180, 10 December 2021;Abdul Wahab Khan v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 11987\/11, \u00a7\u00a7 27-28, 28 January 2014;Airey v. Ireland, 9 October 1979, \u00a7\u00a7 24-25, Series A no. 32;Al-Dulimi and Montana Management Inc. v. Switzerland [GC], no. 5809\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 134 and 145-146, 21 June 2016;Al-Nashif v. Bulgaria, no. 50963\/99, \u00a7 123, 20 June 2002;Al-Saadoon and Mufdhi v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 61498\/08, \u00a7 88, 30 June 2009;Al-Skeini and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 55721\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 131-142, ECHR 2011;Association \u201cRegele Mihai\u201d v. Romania, no. 26916\/95, Commission Decision of 4 September 1995;Association Innocence en Danger and Association Enfance et Partage v. France, nos. 15343\/15 and 16806\/15, \u00a7 130, 4 June 2020;Bankovi\u0107 and Others v. Belgium and Others (dec.) [GC], no. 52207\/99, \u00a7 59, ECHR 2001-XII;Beghal v. the United Kingdom, no. 4755\/16, \u00a7 88, 28 February 2019;Ble\u010di\u0107 v. Croatia [GC], no. 59532\/00, \u00a7 67, ECHR 2006 III;Budayeva and Others v. Russia, nos. 15339\/02 and 4 others, \u00a7\u00a7 134 and 135, ECHR 2008 (extracts);C.B. v. Germany, no. 22012\/93, Commission decision, 11 January 1994;Catan and Others v. the Republic of Moldova and Russia [GC], nos. 43370\/04 and 2 others, \u00a7 103, ECHR 2012 (extracts);Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin C\u00e2mpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 102, 103 and 110, ECHR 2014;Cyprus v. Turkey, Commission decision, \u00a7 8, 26 May 1975, no. 6780\/74;De Wilde, Ooms and Versyp v. Belgium (Article 50), 10 March 1972, \u00a7 22, Series A no. 14;Georgia v. Russia (II) [GC] (merits), no. 38263\/08, 21 January 2021;Ghoumid and Others v. France, nos. 52273\/16 and 4 others, 25 June 2020;Golder v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1975, \u00a7 26, Series A no. 18;Gray v. Germany, no. 49278\/09, 22 May 2014;Grz\u0119da v. Poland [GC], no. 43572\/18, \u00a7 342, 15 March 2022;G\u00fczelyurtlu and Others v. Cyprus and Turkey [GC], no. 36925\/07, 29 January 2019;Habsburg-Lothringen v. Austria, no. 15344\/89, Commission Decision, 14 December 1989;Hanan v. Germany [GC], no. 4871\/16, \u00a7\u00a7 133-142, 16 February 2021;Hashemi and Others v. Azerbaijan, nos. 1480\/16 and 6 others, \u00a7 47, 13 January 2022;Hassan and Others v. France, nos. 46695\/10 and 54588\/10, \u00a7 39, 4 December 2014;Hirsi Jamaa and Others v. Italy [GC], no. 27765\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 52 and 53, ECHR 2012;Janowiec and Others v. Russia [GC], nos. 55508\/07 and 29520\/09, \u00a7 213, ECHR 2013;K2 v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 42387\/13, 7 February 2017;Khan v. France, no. 12267\/16, \u00a7 74, 28 February 2019;Kurt v. Austria [GC], no. 62903\/15, \u00a7\u00a7 157 et seq., 15 June 2021;Lambert and Others v. France [GC], no. 46043\/14, ECHR 2015 (extracts);Leyla \u015eahin v. Turkey [GC], no. 44774\/98, \u00a7 152, ECHR 2005-XI;Lopes de Sousa Fernandes v. Portugal [GC], no. 56080\/13, \u00a7 216, 19 December 2017;M. and Others v. Italy and Bulgaria, no. 40020\/03, \u00a7 127, 31 July 2012;M.N. and Others v. Belgium (dec.) [GC], no. 3599\/18, 5 May 2020;Magyar Helsinki Bizotts\u00e1g v. Hungary [GC], no. 18030\/11, \u00a7\u00a7 118-125, 8 November 2016;Marangos v. Cyprus, no. 31106\/96, Commission decision of 20 May 1997;Marckx v. Belgium, 13 June 1979, \u00a7 31, Series A no. 31;Markovic and Others v. Italy [GC], no. 1398\/03, ECHR 2006-XIV;Mathieu-Mohin and Clerfayt v. Belgium, 2 March 1987, \u00a7 52, Series A no. 113;Mediterraneum joint venture and 10 other applications v. Italy (dec.), no. 351\/05, 29 April 2008;Medvedyev and Others v. France [GC], no. 3394\/03, \u00a7 81, ECHR 2010;Momcilovic v. Croatia (dec.), no. 59138\/00, 29 August 2002;Muhammad and Muhammad v. Romania [GC], no. 80982\/12, \u00a7\u00a7 122-201, 15 October 2020;N.D. and N.T. v. Spain [GC], nos. 8675\/15 and 8697\/15, \u00a7 171, 13 February 2020;Nada v. Switzerland [GC], no. 10593\/08, \u00a7 164, ECHR 2012;Naumov v. Albania (dec.), no. 10513\/03, 4 January 2005;Nessa and Others v. Finland (dec.), no. 31862\/02, 6 May 2003;Pi\u015fkin v. Turkey, no. 33399\/18, \u00a7 227, 15 December 2020;S. v. Germany, no. 11659\/85, Commission decision, 17 October 1986;Slivenko and Others v. Latvia (dec.) [GC], no. 48321\/99, \u00a7 77, ECHR 2002 II (extracts);Soering v. the United Kingdom, 7 July 1989, \u00a7 86, Series A no. 161;Tagayeva and Others v. Russia, nos. 26562\/07 and 6 others, \u00a7 481, 13 April 2017;Ukraine v. Russia (re Crimea) (dec.) [GC], nos. 20958\/14 and 38334\/18, \u00a7 344, 16 December 2020;Usmanov v. Russia, no. 43936\/18, \u00a7 54, 22 December 2020;Verein gegen Tierfabriken Schweiz (VgT) v. Switzerland (no. 2) [GC], no. 32772\/02, \u00a7 81, ECHR 2009;Victor-Emmanuel De Savoie v. Italy (striking out), no. 53360\/99, 24 April 2003;X and Others v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 22457\/16, \u00a7 182 and 197, 2 February 2021", "external_sources": "Article 12 \u00a7 4 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR);United Nations Human Rights Committee\u2019s (UNCCPR) General Comment no. 27 on the Freedom of Movement under Article 12 of the ICCPR, adopted on 1 November 1999 (UN Documents CCPR\/C\/21\/Rev.1\/Add.9);Article 19 of the International Law Commission (ILC) Draft Articles on Diplomatic Protection and commentary;Vienna Convention on Consular Relations adopted on 24 April 1963;Article 13 \u00a7 2 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights;Article 12 \u00a7 2 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples\u2019 Rights;Article 10 of the International Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC), adopted on 20 November 1989;Explanatory Report to Protocol No. 4 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, securing certain rights and freedoms other than those\nalready included in the Convention and in the first Protocol thereto (STE no. 46);Four Geneva Conventions of 1949;Rule 144 of the International Committee of the Red Cross study on Customary International Humanitarian Law;Report of the Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms while countering terrorism, following her visit to France from 14 to 23 May 2018 (A\/HRC\/40\/52\/Add.4, 8 May 2019);Council of Europe Parliamentary Assembly and Committee of Ministers (PACE) Recommendation 2169 (2020), entitled \u201cInternational obligations concerning the repatriation of children from war and conflict zones\u201d, adopted on 30 January 2020;Reply to Recommendation 2169, adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 8 December 2020 (at the 1391st meeting of the Ministers\u2019 Deputies);PACE Resolution 2321 (2020) adopted on 30 January 2020;PACE Committee on Social Affairs, Health and Sustainable Development Declaration adopted on 16 March 2021;European Parliament Resolution on the rights of the child (2019\/2876 (RSP)), adopted on 26 November 2019;European Parliament Resolution on the Syrian conflict \u2013 10 years after the uprising (2021\/2576 (RSP)), adopted on 11 March 2021\n", "conclusion": "Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Locus standi;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione loci;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione personae;Violation of Article 3 of Protocol No. 4 - Prohibition of expulsion of nationals (Article 3 para. 2 of Protocol No. 4 - Enter own country);Respondent State to take individual measures (Article 46-2 - Individual measures);Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Ganna Yudkivska;Jon Fridrik Kj\u00f8lbro;Krzysztof Wojtyczek;M\u0101rti\u0146\u0161 Mits;Robert Spano;S\u00edofra O'Leary;St\u00e9phanie Mourou-Vikstr\u00f6m;Yonko Grozev;Georges Ravarani;Ksenija Turkovi\u0107;Lorraine Schembri Orland", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0914JUD002438419" }, "5": { "webcast_id": "4981209_07072021", "hearing_date": "2021-07-07 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Vegotex International S.A. v. Belgium (no. 49812\/09)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "49812\/09", "case_id": "001-220415", "case_name": "CASE OF VEGOTEX INTERNATIONAL S.A. v. BELGIUM", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-220415", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2022-11-03 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Article 444 of the 1992 Income Tax Code ; Section 49 of the Miscellaneous Provisions Act of 9 July 2004 ; Articles 2244 and 2251 of the Civil Code ; Section 11 of the Act of 23 March 1999 on the organisation of the courts in tax matters", "represented_by": "WOUTERS P. ; VAN BELLE D.", "respondent": "BEL", "articles": "6;6-1;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "A and B v. Norway [GC], nos. 24130\/11 and 29758\/11, 15 November 2016;Advisory opinion on the applicability of statutes of limitation to prosecution, conviction and punishment in respect of an offence constituting, in substance, an act of torture [GC], request no. P16-2021-001, Armenian Court of Cassation, \u00a7 72, 26 April 2022;Antia and Khupenia v. Georgia, no. 7523\/10, 18 June 2020;Arnolin and Others v. France, nos. 20127\/03 and 24 others, \u00a7 76, 9 January 2007;Biagioli v. San Marino (dec.), no. 8162\/13, \u00a7\u00a7 92-94, 8 July 2014;Ble\u010di\u0107 v. Croatia [GC], no. 59532\/00, \u00a7 67, ECHR 2006-III;Borcea v. Romania (dec.), no. 55959\/14, \u00a7 64, 22 September 2015;Cabourdin v. France, no. 60796\/00, \u00a7 37, 11 April 2006;\u010cepek v. the Czech Republic, no. 9815\/10, 5 September 2013;Chap Ltd v. Armenia, no. 15485\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 41 and 44, 4 May 2017;Chim and Przywieczerski v. Poland, nos. 36661\/07 and 38433\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 199-207, 12 April 2018;Clinique des Acacias and Others v. France, nos. 65399\/01 and 3 others, 13 October 2005;Co\u00ebme and Others v. Belgium, nos. 32492\/96 and 4 others, \u00a7 149, ECHR 2000 VII;Denisov v. Ukraine [GC], no. 76639\/11, \u00a7 146, 25 September 2018;Deweer v. Belgium, 27 February 1980, \u00a7 46, Series A no. 35;Dimopulos v. Turkey, no. 37766\/05, \u00a7 45, 2 April 2019;Eckle v. Germany, 15 July 1982, \u00a7 73, Series A no. 51;Engel and Others v. the Netherlands, 8 June 1976, Series A no. 22;Ezeh and Connors v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 39665\/98 and 40086\/98, \u00a7 82, ECHR 2003-X;Ferrazzini v. Italy [GC], no. 44759\/98, ECHR 2001 VII;Georgiou v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 40042\/98, 16 May 2000;Gestur J\u00f3nsson and Ragnar Halld\u00f3r Hall v. Iceland [GC], nos. 68273\/14 and 68271\/14, 22 December 2020;Golder v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1975, \u00a7 36, Series A no. 18;Gu\u00f0mundur Andri \u00c1str\u00e1\u00f0sson v. Iceland [GC], no. 26374\/18, \u00a7 238, 1 December 2020;Gu\u00e9rin v. France, 29 July 1998, \u00a7 37, Reports 1998-V;Hentrich v. France, 22 September 1994, \u00a7 39, Series A no. 296-A;H\u00f4pital local Saint Pierre d\u2019Ol\u00e9ron and Others v. France, nos. 18096\/12 and 20 others, 8 November 2018;Hussein and Others v. Belgium, no. 45187\/12, \u00a7 60, 16 March 2021;Idalov v. Russia [GC], no. 5826\/03, \u00a7 186, 22 May 2012;Janosevic v. Sweden, no. 34619\/97, ECHR 2002 VII;Jussila v. Finland [GC], no. 73053\/01, ECHR 2006 XIV;K\u00f6nig v. Germany, 28 June 1978, \u00a7 98, Series A no. 27;Legrand v. France, no. 23228\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 36-40, 26 May 2011;Les Authentiks and Supras Auteuil 91 v. France, nos. 4696\/11 and 4703\/11, 27 October 2016;Lilly France v. France (no. 2), no. 20429\/07, \u00a7 51, 25 November 2010;Lobo Machado v. Portugal, 20 February 1996, \u00a7 31, Reports 1996-I;Lupeni Greek Catholic Parish and Others v. Romania [GC], no. 76943\/11, \u00a7 123, 29 November 2016;Maggio and Others v. Italy, nos. 46286\/09 and 4 others, 31 May 2011;Murray v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 10511\/10, \u00a7 134, 26 April 2016;Nada v. Switzerland [GC], no. 10593\/08, \u00a7 243, ECHR 2012;National & Provincial Building Society, Leeds Permanent Building Society and Yorkshire Building Society v. the United Kingdom, 23 October 1997, \u00a7 112, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997 VII;Nicolae Virgiliu T\u0103nase v. Romania [GC], no. 41720\/13, \u00a7\u00a7 192 and 195, 25 June 2019;Nider\u00f6st-Huber v. Switzerland, 18 February 1997, \u00a7 23, Reports 1997 I;OGIS-Institut Stanislas, OGEC Saint-Pie X and Blanche de Castille and Others v. France, nos. 42219\/98 and 54563\/00, 27 May 2004;Oleksandr Volkov v. Ukraine, no. 21722\/11, \u00a7 137, ECHR 2013;P\u00e9lissier and Sassi v. France [GC], no. 25444\/94, \u00a7 67, ECHR 1999-II;Petko Petkov v. Bulgaria, no. 2834\/06, 19 February 2013;Pressos Compania Naviera S.A. and Others v. Belgium, 20 November 1995, Series A no. 332;Previti v. Italy (dec.), no. 1845\/08, \u00a7 80, 12 February 2013;Ramos Nunes de Carvalho e S\u00e1 v. Portugal [GC], nos. 55391\/13 and 2 others, 6 November 2018;Regner v. the Czech Republic [GC], no. 35289\/11, \u00a7 146, 19 September 2017;Rivera Vazquez and Calleja Delsordo v. Switzerland, no. 65048\/13, 22 January 2019;S.C. Service Benz Com S.R.L. v. Romania, no. 58045\/11, \u00a7\u00a7 32 33, 4 July 2017;Scoppola v. Italy (no. 2) [GC], no. 10249\/03, \u00a7 132, 17 September 2009;Scordino v. Italy (no. 1) [GC], no. 36813\/97, \u00a7 126, ECHR 2006-V;Segame SA v. France, no. 4837\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 56-60, ECHR 2012 (extracts);Simeonovi v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 21980\/04, \u00a7 110, 12 May 2017;Skondrianos v. Greece, nos. 63000\/00 and 2 others, \u00a7\u00a7 29-30, 18 December 2003;Str\u00e4g Datatj\u00e4nster AB v. Sweden (dec.), no. 50664\/99, 21 June 2005;Stran Greek Refineries and Stratis Andreadis v. Greece, 9 December 1994, \u00a7 49, Series A no. 301-B;Vermeulen v. Belgium, 20 February 1996, \u00a7 33, Reports 1996-I;Villnow v. Belgium (dec.), no. 16938\/05, 29 January 2008;Zielinski and Pradal and Gonzalez and Others v. France [GC], nos. 24846\/94 and 9 others, \u00a7 57, ECHR 1999-VII;Zubac v. Croatia [GC], no. 40160\/12, \u00a7\u00a7 76-78, 5 April 2018", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Administrative proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing);No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Administrative proceedings;Article 6-1 - Access to court;Fair hearing;Adversarial trial;Equality of arms);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Administrative proceedings;Article 6-1 - Reasonable time);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Ale\u0161 Pejchal;Armen Harutyunyan;Ganna Yudkivska;Georgios A. Serghides;Helen Keller;Jon Fridrik Kj\u00f8lbro;Paul Lemmens;Robert Spano;S\u00edofra O'Leary;Yonko Grozev;Gabriele Kucsko-Stadlmayer;Georges Ravarani;Ksenija Turkovi\u0107;Mar\u00eda El\u00f3segui", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1103JUD004981209" }, "6": { "webcast_id": "4981209_07072021", "hearing_date": "2021-07-07 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Vegotex International S.A. v. Belgium (no. 49812\/09)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "49812\/09", "case_id": "001-206214", "case_name": "CASE OF VEGOTEX INTERNATIONAL S.A. v. BELGIUM", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-206214", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2020-11-10 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 3, "court": "6", "issue": "Section 49 of the Miscellaneous Provisions Act of 9 July 2004 ; Article 1107 of the Judicial Code", "represented_by": "WOUTERS P. ; VAN BELLE D.", "respondent": "BEL", "articles": "6;6-1;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "A and B v. Norway [GC], nos. 24130\/11 and 29758\/11, \u00a7 133, 15 November 2016;A.P., M.P. and T.P. v. Switzerland, 29 August 1997, \u00a7 40, Reports 1997 V;Amirov v. Armenia (dec.), no 25512\/06, 18 January 2011;Arnolin and Others v. France, nos. 20127\/03 and 24 others, \u00a7 76, 9 January 2007;Associated Society of Locomotive Engineers and Firemen (ASLEF) v. the United Kingdom, no 11002\/05, \u00a7 58, 27 February 2007;Biagioli v. San Marino (dec.), no 8162\/13, \u00a7\u00a7 92-94, 8 July 2014;\u010cepek v. the Czech Republic, no 9815\/10, 5 September 2013;Chambaz v. Switzerland, no 11663\/04, \u00a7 42, 5 April 2012;Chim and Przywieczerski v. Poland, nos. 36661\/07 and 38433\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 199-207, 12 April 2018;Cimolino v. Italy, no 12532\/05, \u00a7 45, 22 September 2009;Clinique des Acacias and Others v. France, nos. 65399\/01, 65406\/01, 65405\/01 and 65407\/01, 13 October 2005;Denisov v. Ukraine [GC], no 76639\/11, \u00a7 146, 25 September 2018;Dimopulos v. Turkey, no 37766\/05, \u00a7 32, 2 April 2019;Ferrazzini v. Italy [GC], no 44759\/98, \u00a7 29, ECHR 2001 VII;Formela v. Poland (dec.), no 31651\/08, \u00a7 127, 5 February 2019;Garc\u00eda Ruiz v. Spain [GC], no 30544\/96, \u00a7 28, ECHR 1999 I;Georgiou v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no 40042\/98, 16 May 2000;Gil Sanjuan v. Spain, no 48297\/15, \u00a7 38, 26 May 2020;Idalov v. Russia [GC], no 5826\/03, \u00a7 186, 22 May 2012;J.R. v. Belgium, no 56367\/09, \u00a7 59, 24 January 2017;Janosevic v. Sweden, no 34619\/97, \u00a7 69, ECHR 2002 VII;Jussila v. Finland [GC], no 73053\/01, ECHR 2006 XIV;K\u00f6nig v. Germany, 28 June 1978, \u00a7 98, Series A no 27;Kov\u00e1rov\u00e1 v. Slovakia, no 46564\/10, \u00a7 48, 23 June 2015;Kr\u010dm\u00e1\u0159 and Others v. the Czech Republic, no 35376\/97, \u00a7 39, 3 March 2000;Les Authentiks and Supras Auteuil 91 v. France, nos. 4696\/11 and 4703\/11, \u00a7\u00a7 50-52, 27 October 2016;Liga Portuguesa de Futebol Profissional v. Portugal, no 4687\/11, \u00a7\u00a7 61-62, 17 May 2016;Lilly France v. France (no 2), no 20429\/07, \u00a7 51, 25 November 2010;Lobo Machado v. Portugal, 20 February 1996, \u00a7 31, Reports 1996 I;L\u00f3pez Ribalda and Others v. Spain [GC], nos. 1874\/13 and 8567\/13, \u00a7 149, 17 October 2019;Maggio and Others v. Italy, nos. 46286\/09 and 4 others, 31 May 2011;Murray v. the Netherlands [GC], no 10511\/10, \u00a7 134, 26 April 2016;National & Provincial Building Society, Leeds Permanent Building Society and Yorkshire Building Society v. the United Kingdom 23 October 1997, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997 VII;Ndayegamiye-Mporamazina v. Switzerland, no 16874\/12, \u00a7 39, 5 February 2019;Nider\u00f6st-Huber v. Switzerland, 18 February 1997, \u00a7 23, Reports 1997 I;OGIS-Institut Stanislas, OGEC Saint-Pie X and Blanche de Castille and Others v. France, nos. 42219\/98 and 54563\/00, 27 May 2004;Optim and Industerre v. Belgium (dec.), no 23819\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 24-26, 11 September 2012;Papageorgiou v. Greece, 22 October 1997, \u00a7 38, Reports 1997 VI;P\u00e9lissier and Sassi v. France [GC], no 25444\/94, \u00a7 67, ECHR 1999 II;Pressos Compania Naviera S.A. and Others v. Belgium, 20 November 1995, Series A no 332;Prikyan and Angelova v. Bulgaria, no 44624\/98, \u00a7 46, 16 February 2006;Stran Greek Refineries and Stratis Andreadis v. Greece, 9 December 1994, \u00a7 49, Series A no 301 B;Regner v. the Czech Republic [GC], no 35289\/11, \u00a7 146, 19 September 2017;SCM Scanner de l\u2019Ouest Lyonnais and Others v. France, no 12106\/03, \u00a7 31, 21 June 2007;Scoppola v. Italy (no 2) [GC], no 10249\/03, \u00a7 132, 17 September 2009;Scordino v. Italy (no 1) [GC], no 36813\/97, ECHR 2006 V;Skondrianos v. Greece, nos. 63000\/00, 74291\/01 and 74292\/01, \u00a7\u00a7 29-30, 18 December 2003;Str\u00e4g Datatj\u00e4nster AB v. Sweden (dec.), no 50664\/99, 21 June 2005;Vermeulen v. Belgium, 20 February 1996, \u00a7 33, Reports 1996 I;Villnow v. Belgium (dec.), no 16938\/05, 29 January 2008;Zielinski and Pradal and Gonzalez and Others v. France [GC], nos. 24846\/94 and 9 others, ECHR 1999 VII", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Administrative proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing);No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Administrative proceedings;Article 6-1 - Access to court;Fair hearing;Adversarial trial);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Administrative proceedings;Article 6-1 - Reasonable time);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "FALSE", "judges": "Georgios A. Serghides;Helen Keller;Paul Lemmens;Georges Ravarani;Mar\u00eda El\u00f3segui", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1110JUD004981209" }, "7": { "webcast_id": "7863012_16062021", "hearing_date": "2021-06-16 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "B. v. Switzerland (no. 78630\/12)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "78630\/12", "case_id": "001-220073", "case_name": "CASE OF BEELER v. SWITZERLAND", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-220073", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2022-10-11 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Section 24 (2) of the Federal Law on old age and survivors\u2019 insurance of 20 December 1946 ; Section 122 of the Federal Supreme Court Act of 17 June 2005", "represented_by": "LUGINB\u00dcHL J.", "respondent": "CHE", "articles": "8;8-1;14;14+8-1;35;35-3-a;41;53;P1-1;P1-1-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "A, B and C v. Ireland [GC], no. 25579\/05, \u00a7 281, ECHR 2010;Abdulaziz, Cabales and Balkandali v. the United Kingdom, 28 May 1985, \u00a7 82, Series A no. 94;Airey v. Ireland, 9 October 1979, \u00a7 26, Series A no. 32;Aldeguer Tom\u00e1s v. Spain, no. 35214\/09, 14 June 2016;Andrle v. the Czech Republic, no. 6268\/08, 17 February 2011;B\u00e9lan\u00e9 Nagy v. Hungary [GC], no. 53080\/13, 13 December 2016;Bellet, Huertas and Vialatte v. France (dec.), nos. 40832\/98 and 2 others, 27 April 1999;Belli and Arquier Martinez v. Switzerland, no. 65550\/13, 11 December 2018;Biao v. Denmark [GC], no. 38590\/10, 24 May 2016;Brauer v. Germany, no. 3545\/04, 28 May 2009;Camp and Bourimi v. the Netherlands, no. 28369\/95, ECHR 2000 X;Claes and Others v. Belgium, nos. 46825\/99 and 6 others, \u00a7 53, 2 June 2005;Demir and Baykara v. Turkey [GC], no. 34503\/97, \u00a7\u00a7 57, 60 and 149, ECHR 2008;Dhahbi v. Italy, no. 17120\/09, 8 April 2014;Di Trizio v. Switzerland, no. 7186\/09, 2 February 2016;F\u00e1bi\u00e1n v. Hungary [GC], no. 78117\/13, \u00a7 112, 5 September 2017;Fawsie v. Greece, no. 40080\/07, 28 October 2010;Gaygusuz v. Austria, 16 September 1996, \u00a7\u00a7 39 and 41, Reports 1996 IV;Gen\u00e7el v. Turkey, no. 53431\/99, \u00a7 27, 23 October 2003;Guberina v. Croatia, no. 23682\/13, 22 March 2016;Hasani v. Croatia (dec.), no. 20844\/09, 30 September 2010;Khamtokhu and Aksenchik v. Russia [GC], nos. 60367\/08 and 961\/11, 24 January 2017;Kjartan \u00c1smundsson v. Iceland, no. 60669\/00, \u00a7 39, ECHR 2004 IX;Konstantin Markin v. Russia [GC], no. 30078\/06, ECHR 2012;La Parola and Others v. Italy (dec.), no. 39712\/98, 30 November 2000;Marckx v. Belgium, 13 June 1979, Series A no. 31;McDonald v. the United Kingdom, no. 4241\/12, 20 May 2014;Merger and Cros v. France, no. 68864\/01, \u00a7 46, 22 December 2004;Moskal v. Poland, no. 10373\/05, 15 September 2009;Mu\u00f1oz D\u00edaz v. Spain, no. 49151\/07, ECHR 2009;Neulinger and Shuruk v. Switzerland [GC], no. 41615\/07, \u00a7 160, ECHR 2010;Niedzwiecki v. Germany, no. 58453\/00, 25 October 2005;Okpisz v. Germany, no. 59140\/00, 25 October 2005;Petrovic v. Austria, 27 March 1998, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 II;Pla and Puncernau v. Andorra, no. 69498\/01, ECHR 2004 VIII;\u015eahin v. Germany [GC], no. 30943\/96, \u00a7 85, ECHR 2003 VIII;Santos Hansen v. Denmark (dec.), no. 17949\/07, 9 March 2010;Schaefer v. Germany (dec.), no. 14379\/03, 4 September 2007;\u015eerife Yi\u011fit v. Turkey [GC], no. 3976\/05, 2 November 2010;Si Amer v. France, no. 29137\/06, 29 October 2009;Skorkiewicz v. Poland (dec.), no. 39860\/98, 1 June 1999;Stec and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 65731\/01 and 65900\/01, ECHR 2006 VI;Stec and Others v. the United Kingdom (dec.) [GC], nos. 65731\/01 and 65900\/01, \u00a7 39, ECHR 2005 X;Strand Lobben and Others v. Norway [GC], no. 37283\/13, \u00a7 234, 10 September 2019;\u0160ulcs and Others v. Latvia (dec.), no. 42923\/10, 6 December 2011;Top\u010di\u0107 Rosenberg v. Croatia, no. 19391\/11, 14 November 2013;\u00dcnal Tekeli v. Turkey, no. 29865\/96, ECHR 2004 X (extracts);Vallianatos and Others v. Greece [GC], nos. 29381\/09 and 32684\/09, ECHR 2013 (extracts);Verein gegen Tierfabriken Schweiz (VgT) v. Switzerland (no. 2) [GC], no. 32772\/02, \u00a7 88, ECHR 2009;Weller v. Hungary, no. 44399\/05, 31 March 2009;Willis v. the United Kingdom, no. 36042\/97, ECHR 2002 IV;X and Others v. Austria [GC], no. 19010\/07, ECHR 2013;Yocheva and Ganeva v. Bulgaria, nos. 18592\/15 and 43683\/15, 11 May 2021", "external_sources": "Article 2 (a) of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW);Recommendation no. R (85) 2 of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe of 5 February 1985 on legal protection against sex discrimination", "conclusion": "Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;Violation of Article 14+8-1 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article 8-1 - Respect for family life;Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": null, "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1011JUD007863012" }, "8": { "webcast_id": "7863012_16062021", "hearing_date": "2021-06-16 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "B. v. Switzerland (no. 78630\/12)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "78630\/12", "case_id": "001-205675", "case_name": "CASE OF B. v. SWITZERLAND", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-205675", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2020-10-20 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 3, "court": "6", "issue": "Sections 23 and 24 of the Federal Law of 20 December 1946 on pension insurance and survivors (\u201cLAVS\u201d)", "represented_by": "LUGINB\u00dcHL J.", "respondent": "CHE", "articles": "8;8-1;14;14+8;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Abdulaziz, Cabales and Balkandali v. the United Kingdom, 28 May 1985, \u00a7 82, Series A no 94;Artico v. Italy, 13 May 1980, \u00a7 33, Series A no 37;Belli and Arquier Martinez v. Switzerland, no 65550\/13, 11 December 2018;Burghartz v. Switzerland, 22 February 1994, \u00a7 27, Series A no 280 B;Claes and Others v. Belgium, nos. 46825\/99, \u00a7 53, 2 June 2005;Dhahbi v. Italy, no 17120\/09, \u00a7 41, 8 April 2014;Di Trizio v. Switzerland, no 7186\/09, 2 February 2016;F\u00e1bi\u00e1n v. Hungary [GC], no 78117\/13, \u00a7 112, 5 September 2017;G.M.B. and K.M. v. Switzerland (dec.), no 36797\/97, 27 September 2001;Gaygusuz v. Austria, 16 September 1996, \u00a7 42, Reports 1996 IV;Gen\u00e7el v. Turkey, no 53431\/99, \u00a7 27, 23 October 2003;Glor v. Switzerland, no 13444\/04, \u00a7 52, ECHR 2009;Inze v. Austria, 28 October 1987, \u00a7 41, Series A no 126;Khamtokhu and Aksenchik v. Russia [GC], nos. 60367\/08 and 961\/11, \u00a7 53, 24 January 2017;Kimlya and Others v. Russia, nos. 76836\/01 and 32782\/03, \u00a7 86, ECHR 2009;Konstantin Markin v. Russia [GC], no 30078\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 126-127 and 130, ECHR 2012;Lithgow and Others v. the United Kingdom, 8 July 1986, Series A no 102, \u00a7 177;Merger and Cros v. France, no 68864\/01, \u00a7 46, 22 December 2004;Mikuli\u0107 v. Croatia, no 53176\/99, \u00a7 53, ECHR 2002 I;National & Provincial Building Society, Leeds Permanent Building Society and Yorkshire Building Society v. the United Kingdom, 23 October 1997, \u00a7 88, Reports 1997 VII;Otgon v. the Republic of Moldova, no 22743\/07, 25 October 2016;Petrovic v. Austria, 27 March 1998, \u00a7\u00a7 27 and 30, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 II;Rasmussen v. Denmark, 28 November 1984, \u00a7 40, Series A no 87;Sahin v. Germany [GC], no 30943\/96, \u00a7 85, ECHR 2003 VIII;Schuler Zgraggen v. Switzerland, 24 June 1993, \u00a7 67, Series A no 263;Stafford v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 46295\/99, \u00a7 68, ECHR 2002 IV;Stec and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 65731\/01 and 65900\/01, \u00a7\u00a7 51 and 63-64, ECHR 2006 VI;\u00dcnal Tekeli v. Turkey, no 29865\/96, \u00a7\u00a7 54 and 63, ECHR 2004 X;Vallianatos and Others v. Greece [GC], nos. 29381\/09 and 32684\/09, \u00a7 72, ECHR 2013;Vasilenkov v. Ukraine, no 19872\/02, \u00a7 18, 3 May 2005;Verein gegen Tierfabriken Schweiz (VgT) v. Switzerland (no 2) [GC], no 32772\/02, \u00a7 88, ECHR 2009;Weller v. Hungary, no 44399\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 28-29, 31 March 2009;Yuriy Romanov v. Russia, no 69341\/01, \u00a7 45, 25 October 2005;Zarb Adami v. Malta, no 17209\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 71-73, ECHR 2006 VIII", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Violation of Article 14+8 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article 8-1 - Respect for family life;Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Insufficient reparation under national law;Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Alena Pol\u00e1\u010dkov\u00e1;Georgios A. Serghides;Helen Keller;Paul Lemmens;Lorraine Schembri Orland;Mar\u00eda El\u00f3segui", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1020JUD007863012" }, "9": { "webcast_id": "4927011_26052021", "hearing_date": "2021-05-26 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Savickis and Others v. Latvia (no. 49270\/11)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "49270\/11", "case_id": "001-217963", "case_name": "CASE OF SAVICKIS AND OTHERS v. LATVIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-217963", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2022-06-09 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "State Pensions Act of 2 November 1995 ; Paragraph 1 of the transitional provisions of the State Pensions Act of 2 November 1995 as in force from 1 July 2008 until 18 July 2012 ; Citizenship Act\r\n", "represented_by": "NIKU\u013bCEVA I.", "respondent": "LVA", "articles": "14;14+P1-1;37;37-1;37-1-c;P1-1;P1-1-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Abdulaziz, Cabales and Balkandali v. the United Kingdom, 28 May 1985, \u00a7 88, Series A no. 94;Ahmet Sad\u0131k v. Greece, 15 November 1996, \u00a7 3, Reports 1996-V;Ahtinen v. Finland (dec.), no. 48907\/99, 31 May 2005;Al-Dulimi and Montana Management Inc. v. Switzerland [GC], no. 5809\/08, \u00a7 134, 21 June 2016;Andrejeva v. Latvia [GC], no. 55707\/00, ECHR 2009;Bah v. the United Kingdom, no. 56328\/07, \u00a7 47, ECHR 2011;Berdzenishvili v. Russia (dec.), no. 31697\/03, ECHR 2004-II;British Gurkha Welfare Society and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 44818\/11, 15 September 2016;Broniowski v. Poland (dec.) [GC], no. 31443\/96, \u00a7 74, ECHR 2002-X;Broniowski v. Poland [GC], no. 31443\/96, \u00a7\u00a7 149 and 162 63, ECHR 2004-V;Burden v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 13378\/05, \u00a7 60, ECHR 2008;Carson and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 42184\/05, ECHR 2010;Catan and Others v. the Republic of Moldova and Russia [GC], nos. 43370\/04 and 2 others, ECHR 2012 (extracts);Cyprus v. Turkey [GC], no. 25781\/94, ECHR 2001 IV;D.H. and Others v. the Czech Republic [GC], no. 57325\/00 \u00a7\u00a7 177 and 196, ECHR 2007 IV;Dalban v. Romania [GC], no. 28114\/95, \u00a7 1, ECHR 1999-VI;Damjanac v. Croatia, no. 52943\/10, \u00a7 87, 24 October 2013;Denis and Irvine v. Belgium [GC], nos. 62819\/17 and 63921\/17, \u00a7\u00a7 99-101, 1 June 2021;Denisov v. Ukraine [GC], no. 76639\/11, \u00a7 93, 25 September 2018;Elberte v. Latvia, no. 61243\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 79-80, 13 January 2015;F\u00e1bi\u00e1n v. Hungary [GC], no. 78117\/13, 5 September 2017;Fabris v. France [GC], no. 16574\/08, \u00a7 56, ECHR 2013;Gaygusuz v. Austria, 16 September 1996, \u00a7\u00a7 40, 42 and 47, Reports 1996 IV;Ghavalyan v. Armenia, no. 50423\/08, \u00a7 60, 22 October 2020;Gross v. Switzerland [GC], no. 67810\/10, \u00a7 28, ECHR 2014;Guberina v. Croatia, no. 23682\/13, \u00a7\u00a7 70 and 74, ECHR 2016;Ha\u00e1sz and Szab\u00f3 v. Hungary, nos. 11327\/14 and 11613\/14, \u00a7\u00a7 36-37, 13 October 2015;Hoti v. Croatia, no. 63311\/14, \u00a7 85, 26 April 2018;J.D. and A. v. the United Kingdom, nos. 32949\/17 and 34614\/17, 24 October 2019;Jankovi\u0107 v. Croatia (dec.), no. 43440\/98, ECHR 2000 X;Jasinskij v. Lithuania (dec.), no. 38985\/97, 9 September 1998;Jeronovi\u010ds v. Latvia [GC], no. 44898\/10, \u00a7 75, 5 July 2016;Jur\u010di\u0107 v. Croatia, no. 54711\/15, \u00a7 64, 4 February 2021;Kolk and Kislyiy v. Estonia (dec.), nos. 23052\/04 and 24018\/04, ECHR 2006 I;Konstantin Markin v. Russia [GC], no. 30078\/06, \u00a7 126, ECHR 2012;Koua Poirrez v. France, no. 40892\/98, \u00a7\u00a7 41 and 47, ECHR 2003 X;Kova\u010di\u0107 and Others v. Slovenia [GC], nos. 44574\/98 and 2 others, 3 October 2008;Kuolelis and Others v. Lithuania, nos. 74357\/01 and 2 others, \u00a7 8, 19 February 2008;Kuri\u0107 and Others v. Slovenia [GC], no. 26828\/06, ECHR 2012 (extracts);Leki\u0107 v. Slovenia [GC], no. 36480\/07, \u00a7 65, 11 December 2018;Likvid\u0113jam\u0101 p\/s Selga and Vasi\u013cevska v. Latvia (dec.), nos. 17126\/02 and 24991\/02, 1 October 2013;Luczak v. Poland, no. 77782\/01, ECHR 2007 XIII;Magyar Helsinki Bizotts\u00e1g v. Hungary [GC], no. 18030\/11, \u00a7 150, 8 November 2016;Makar\u010deva v. Lithuania (dec.), no. 31838\/19, \u00a7 68, 28 September 2021;Martinie v. France [GC], no. 58675\/00, \u00a7 54, ECHR 2006-VI;Molla Sali v. Greece [GC], no. 20452\/14, 19 December 2018;Mraovi\u0107 v. Croatia (striking out) [GC], no. 30373\/13, \u00a7 24, 9 April 2021;Na\u00eft-Liman v. Switzerland [GC], no. 51357\/07, \u00a7 174, 15 March 2018;Penart v. Estonia (dec.), nos. 14685\/04, 24 January 2006;Pichkur v. Ukraine, no. 10441\/06, \u00a7 51, 7 November 2013;Ponomaryovi v. Bulgaria, no. 5335\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 54-56, ECHR 2011;Popovi\u0107 and Others v. Serbia, nos. 26944\/13 and 3 others, \u00a7 46, 30 June 2020;Rangelov v. Germany, no. 5123\/07, \u00a7 99, 22 March 2012;Riba\u0107 v. Slovenia, no. 57101\/10, \u00a7\u00a7 43-45 and 53, 15 December 2017;Sabri G\u00fcne\u015f v. Turkey [GC], no. 27396\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 39-40, 29 June 2012;Sapeyan v. Armenia, no. 35738\/03, \u00a7 23, 13 January 2009;Schmidt v. Latvia, no. 22493\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 66-71, 27 April 2017;S\u00f5ro v. Estonia, no. 22588\/08, \u00a7 6, 3 September 2015;Stec and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 65731\/01 and 65900\/01, ECHR 2006-VI;Stummer v. Austria [GC], no. 37452\/02, \u00a7 88, ECHR 2011;Tarkoev and Others v. Estonia, nos. 14480\/08 and 47916\/08, 4 November 2010;Tomaszewscy v. Poland, no. 8933\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 117-119, 15 April 2014;Tucka v. the United Kingdom (no. 1) (dec.), no. 34586\/10, 18 January 2011;Ukraine v. Russia (re Crimea) [GC] (dec.), nos. 20958\/14 and 38334\/18, 16 December 2020;Ulemek v. Croatia, no. 21613\/16, \u00a7 77, 31 October 2019;Vasiliauskas v. Lithuania [GC], no. 35343\/05, ECHR 2015;Vasiljevi\u0107 and Drobnjakovi\u0107 v. Serbia (dec.), nos. 43987\/11 and 51910\/15, \u00a7 42, 28 January 2020;Visti\u0146\u0161 and Perepjolkins v. Latvia [GC], no. 71243\/01, \u00a7 113, 25 October 2012;Vladimir Romanov v. Russia, no. 41461\/02, \u00a7 52, 24 July 2008;Vrountou v. Cyprus, no. 33631\/06, \u00a7 61, 13 October 2015;Zakharov v. Russia [GC], no. 47143\/06, \u00a7 164, ECHR 2015;\u017ddanoka v. Latvia [GC], no. 58278\/00, \u00a7\u00a7 12-13, ECHR 2006 IV", "external_sources": "Resolution of 13 January 1983 of the European Parliament regarding the Baltic States;Resolution 189 (1960) of 29 September 1960 the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, entitled \u201cSituation in the Baltic States on the twentieth anniversary of their forcible incorporation into the Soviet Union\u201d;Resolution 872(1987) of 28 January 1987 of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, entitled \u201cSituation of the Baltic peoples\u201d\r\n", "conclusion": "Struck out of the list (Art. 37) Striking out applications-{general};(Art. 37-1) Striking out applications;(Art. 37-1-c) Continued examination not justified;No violation of Article 14+P1-1 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property;Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": null, "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0609JUD004927011" }, "10": { "webcast_id": "4927011_26052021", "hearing_date": "2021-05-26 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Savickis and Others v. Latvia (no. 49270\/11)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "49270\/11", "case_id": "001-156290", "case_name": "SAVICKIS AND OTHERS v. LATVIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-156290", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "BUZAJEVS V.", "respondent": "LVA", "articles": "14;P1-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Communicated", "separate_opinion": "", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "11": { "webcast_id": "4357218_19052021", "hearing_date": "2021-05-19 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Grz\u0119da v. Poland (no. 43572\/18)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "43572\/18", "case_id": "001-216400", "case_name": "CASE OF GRZ\u0118DA v. POLAND", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-216400", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2022-03-15 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Constitution ; 2001 Act on the National Council of the Judiciary ; 2011 Act on the National Council of the Judiciary ; 2017 Act Amending the Act on the National Council of the Judiciary of 2011 and certain other statutes", "represented_by": "PIETRZAK M. ; M\u0104CZKA PACHOLAK M.", "respondent": "POL", "articles": "6;6-1;35;35-3-a;35-3-b;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Al-Dulimi and Montana Management Inc. v. Switzerland [GC], no. 5809\/08, 21 June 2016;Alparslan Altan v. Turkey, no. 12778\/17, \u00a7 102, 16 April 2019;Amuur v. France, 25 June 1996, \u00a7 50, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 III;Baka v. Hungary [GC], no. 20261\/12, 23 June 2016;Ba\u015f v. Turkey, no. 66448\/17, \u00a7 144, 3 March 2020;Bilgen v. Turkey, no. 1571\/07, 9 March 2021;Boulois v. Luxembourg [GC], no. 37575\/04, \u00a7 91, ECHR 2012;Broda and Bojara v. Poland, nos. 26691\/18 and 27367\/18, 29 June 2021;Burmych and Others v. Ukraine (striking out) [GC], nos. 46852\/13 et al., \u00a7\u00a7 120-22, 12 October 2017;Camelia Bogdan v. Romania, no. 36889\/18, \u00a7 70, 20 October 2020;Denisov v. Ukraine [GC], no. 76639\/11, \u00a7 54, 25 September 2018;Di Giovanni v. Italy, no. 51160\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 36 37, 9 July 2013;Dzhidzheva-Trendafilova v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 12628\/09, 9 October 2012;Emina\u011fao\u011flu v. Turkey, no. 76521\/12, \u00a7 80, 9 March 2021;Golder v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1975, \u00a7 34, Series A no. 18;Gu\u00f0mundur Andri \u00c1str\u00e1\u00f0sson v. Iceland [GC], no. 26374\/18, 1 December 2020;Gumenyuk and Others v. Ukraine, no. 11423\/19, 22 July 2021;Harabin v. Slovakia, no. 58688\/11, \u00a7\u00a7 118-123, 20 November 2012;Iatridis v. Greece [GC], no. 31107\/96, \u00a7 58, ECHR 1999 II;Juri\u010di\u0107 v. Croatia, no. 58222\/09, 26 July 2011;Kamenos v. Cyprus, no. 147\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 82 88, 31 October 2017;Kar\u00e1csony and Others v. Hungary [GC], nos. 42461\/13 and 44357\/13, \u00a7 189, 17 May 2016;K\u00e1roly Nagy v. Hungary [GC], no. 56665\/09, 14 September 2017;K\u00f6vesi v. Romania, no. 3594\/19, 5 May 2020;Kud\u0142a v. Poland [GC], no. 30210\/96, \u00a7 146, ECHR 2000 XI;Kulykov and Others v. Ukraine, nos. 5114\/09 and 17 others, \u00a7\u00a7 118 and 132, 19 January 2017;Loquifer v. Belgium, nos. 79089\/13 and 2 others, \u00a7 33, 20 July 2021;Markovic and Others v. Italy [GC], no. 1398\/03, \u00a7 92, ECHR 2006 XIV;McElhinney v. Ireland [GC], no. 31253\/96, \u00a7 33, ECHR 2001 XI (extracts);Mennitto v. Italy [GC], no. 33804\/96, \u00a7 23, ECHR 2000 X;Molla Sali v. Greece [GC], no. 20452\/14, \u00a7 149, 19 December 2018;Muhammad and Muhammad v. Romania [GC], no. 80982\/12, \u00a7 118, 15 October 2020;Na\u00eft-Liman v. Switzerland [GC], no. 51357\/07, \u00a7 106, 15 March 2018;Neves e Silva v. Portugal, 27 April 1989, \u00a7 37, Series A no. 153 A;O\u2019Keeffe v. Ireland [GC], no. 35810\/09, \u00a7 199, ECHR 2014;Oleksandr Volkov v. Ukraine, no. 21722\/11, \u00a7\u00a7 91 and 96, ECHR 2013;Oluji\u0107 v. Croatia, no. 22330\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 31-43, 5 February 2009;Paluda v. Slovakia, no. 33392\/12, \u00a7\u00a7 33-34, 23 May 2017;Paroisse gr\u00e9co-catholique Lupeni et autres c. Roumanie [GC], no 76943\/11, \u00a7 71, 29 novembre 2016;Radomilja and Others v. Croatia [GC], nos. 37685\/10 and 22768\/12, \u00a7 149, 20 March 2018;Ramos Nunes de Carvalho e S\u00e1 v. Portugal [GC], nos. 55391\/13 and 2 others, \u00a7\u00a7 120-96, 6 November 2018;Reczkowicz v. Poland, no. 43447\/19, 22 July 2021;Regner v. the Czech Republic [GC], no. 35289\/11, 19 September 2017;Roche v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 32555\/96, \u00a7 119, ECHR 2005 X;S., V. and A. v. Denmark [GC], nos. 35553\/12 and 2 others, \u00a7 148, 22 October 2018;Selahattin Demirta\u015f v. Turkey (no. 2) [GC], no. 14305\/17, \u00a7 269, 22 December 2020;Sturua v. Georgia, no. 45729\/05, \u00a7 27, 28 March 2017;Thiam v. France, no. 80018\/12, \u00a7\u00a7 81-82, 18 October 2018;Tosti v. Italy (dec.), no. 27791\/06, 12 May 2009;Tsanova-Gecheva v. Bulgaria, no. 43800\/12, 15 September 2015;Vav\u0159i\u010dka and Others v. the Czech Republic, 8 April 2021, no. 47621\/13;Vilho Eskelinen and Others v. Finland [GC], no. 63235\/00, ECHR 2007 II;Xero Flor w Polsce sp. z o.o. v. Poland, no. 4907\/18, 7 May 2021;Zubac v. Croatia [GC], no. 40160\/12, \u00a7 76, 5 April 2018", "external_sources": "Final opinion of 5 May 2017 of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe\u2019s Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights on Draft Amendments to the Act on the National Council of the Judiciary and Certain Other Acts of Poland;Recommendation by the Committee Ministers of 17 November 2010 on \u201cJudges: independence, efficiency and responsibilities\u201d and Appendix (CM\/Rec(2010)12);Plan of Action on Strengthening Judicial Independence and Impartiality adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 13 April 2016 at the 1253rd meeting of the Ministers\u2019 Deputies;Resolution 2188 (2017) of 11 October 2017 of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe entitled \u201cNew threats to the rule of law in the Council of Europe Member States\u201d;Report of the European Commission for Democracy Through Law on the Independence of the Judicial System Part I: the Independence of Judges, adopted at its 82nd Plenary Session (Venice, 12-13 March 2010, CDL-AD(2010)004);Rule of Law Checklist, adopted by European Commission for Democracy Through Law at its 106th Plenary Session (11-12 March 2016, CDL AD(2016)007);Compilation of opinions and reports of the European Commission for Democracy Through Law concerning courts and judges (CDL-PI (2015)001);Opinion of 11 December 2017 of the European Commission for Democracy Through Law on the Draft [2017 Amending Act], on the Draft (2017 Act on the Supreme Court] proposed by the President of Poland, and on the Act on the Organisation of Ordinary Courts (Opinion no. CDL-AD(2017)031);Opinion no. 10 (2007) of 23 November 2007 of the Consultative Council of European Judges on \u201cthe Council for the Judiciary at the service of society\u201d;Magna Carta of Judges (Fundamental Principles) of November 2010 of the Consultative Council of European Judges;Opinion no. 24 of 5 November 2021 of the Consultative Council of European Judges on the Evolution of the Councils for the Judiciary and Their Role in Independent and Impartial Judicial Systems;Opinion of 12 October 2017 of the Bureau of the Consultative Council of European Judges following the request of the Polish National Council of the Judiciary to provide an oipinion with respect to the Draft Act of September 2017 presented by the President of Poland amending the Act on the Polish National Council of the Judiciary and certain other acts (CCJE-BU(2017)9REV);Report of 5 April 2018 of the United Nations Special Rapporteur on the Independence of Judges and Lawyers on his mission to Poland (UN Human Rights Council, document A\/HRC\/38\/38\/Add.1.);Report of 28 June 2019 of the Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights on her visit to Poland from 11 to 15 March 2019;Group of States against Corruption (GRECO) Addendum to the Fourth Round Evaluation Report on Poland (Rule 34) (22 June 2018)\n(Greco-AdHocRep(2018)3);Reasoned proposal of 20 December 2017 of the European Commission to the Council of the European Union (COM\/2017\/0360);Resolution of 17 September 2020 of the European Parliament on the proposal for a Council decision on the determination of a clear risk of a serious breach of the rule of law by the Republic of Poland (COM(2017)0835 -2017\/0360R(NLE));Article 27 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties of 1969", "conclusion": "Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-b) No significant disadvantage;Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6-1 - Access to court;Civil rights and obligations;Determination (civil);Dispute);Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Alena Pol\u00e1\u010dkov\u00e1;Carlo Ranzoni;Egidijus K\u016bris;Georgios A. Serghides;Jon Fridrik Kj\u00f8lbro;Krzysztof Wojtyczek;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Paul Lemmens;Robert Spano;S\u00edofra O'Leary;Yonko Grozev;Ksenija Turkovi\u0107", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0315JUD004357218" }, "12": { "webcast_id": "4357218_19052021", "hearing_date": "2021-05-19 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Grz\u0119da v. Poland (no. 43572\/18)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "43572\/18", "case_id": "001-194853", "case_name": "GRZ\u0118DA v. POLAND", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-194853", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "PIETRZAK M. ; MACZKA-PACHOLAK M.", "respondent": "POL", "articles": "6;6-1;13", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Communicated", "separate_opinion": "", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "13": { "webcast_id": "1537916_27012021", "hearing_date": "2021-01-27 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Abdi Ibrahim v. Norway (no. 15379\/16)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "15379\/16", "case_id": "001-214433", "case_name": "CASE OF ABDI IBRAHIM v. NORWAY", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-214433", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2021-12-10 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Child Welfare Act of 17 July 1992", "represented_by": "LUTINA A.", "respondent": "NOR", "articles": "8;8-1;8-2;9;9-1;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "A.S. v. Norway, no. 60371\/15, \u00a7\u00a7 59-61, 17 December 2019;C\u00een\u021ba v. Romania, no. 3891\/19, \u00a7 26, 18 February 2020;Folger\u00f8 and Others v. Norway [GC], no. 15472\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 54 and 100, ECHR 2007 III;Gu\u00f0mundur Andri \u00c1str\u00e1\u00f0sson v. Iceland [GC], no. 26374\/18, \u00a7 311, 1 December 2020;Haddad v. Spain, no. 16572\/17, \u00a7 79, 18 June 2019;Hernehult v. Norway, no. 14652\/16, \u00a7\u00a7 61-63, 10 March 2020;Ilnseher v. Germany [GC], nos. 10211\/12 and 27505\/14, \u00a7 100, 4 December 2018;\u0130zzettin Do\u011fan and Others v. Turkey [GC], no. 62649\/10, \u00a7\u00a7 68 and 93, 26 April 2016;Johansen v. Norway (dec.), no. 12750\/02, 10 October 2002;K.O. and V.M. v. Norway, no. 64808\/16, \u00a7\u00a7 59-60, 19 November 2019;Kjeldsen, Busk Madsen and Pedersen v. Denmark, 7 December 1976, \u00a7 52, Series A no. 23;Lautsi and Others v. Italy [GC], no. 30814\/06, \u00a7 59, ECHR 2011 (extracts);M.L. v. Norway, no. 64639\/16, \u00a7\u00a7 77-81 and 98, 22 December 2020;Nagmetov v. Russia [GC], no. 35589\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 63 and 85, 30 March 2017;Navalnyy v. Russia [GC], nos. 29580\/12 and 4 others, \u00a7 102, 15 November 2018;Olsson v. Sweden (no. 1), 24 March 1988, \u00a7 95, Series A no. 130;Omorefe v. Spain, no. 69339\/16, \u00a7 70, 23 June 2020;Palomo S\u00e1nchez and Others v. Spain [GC], nos. 28955\/06 and 3 others, \u00a7\u00a7 53 et seq., ECHR 2011;Pedersen and Others v. Norway, no. 39710\/15, \u00a7\u00a7 60-62, 10 March 2020;Radomilja and Others v. Croatia [GC], nos. 37685\/10 and 22768\/12, \u00a7 126, 20 March 2018;Socialist Party and Others v. Turkey, 25 May 1998, \u00a7 41, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-III;Stec and Others v. the United Kingdom (dec.) [GC], nos. 65731\/01 and 65900\/01, \u00a7 48, ECHR 2005-X;Strand Lobben and Others v. Norway [GC], no. 37283\/13, 10 September 2019;Tennenbaum v. Sweden (dec.) no. 16031\/90, 3 May 1993;X v. the United Kingdom, no. 7626\/76, 11 July 1977;Y.I. v. Russia, no. 68868\/14, \u00a7\u00a7 75-78, 25 February 2020;Young, James and Webster v. the United Kingdom, 13 August 1981, \u00a7 57, Series A no. 44", "external_sources": "Article 20(3) of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child adopted on 20 November 1989", "conclusion": "Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for family life) read in the light of Article 9 - (Art. 9) Freedom of thought, conscience and religion (Article 9-1 - Freedom of religion);Non-pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Alena Pol\u00e1\u010dkov\u00e1;Egidijus K\u016bris;Ganna Yudkivska;Georgios A. Serghides;Jon Fridrik Kj\u00f8lbro;Marko Bo\u0161njak;M\u0101rti\u0146\u0161 Mits;Paul Lemmens;Robert Spano;S\u00edofra O'Leary;St\u00e9phanie Mourou-Vikstr\u00f6m;Yonko Grozev;Ksenija Turkovi\u0107;Pere Pastor Vilanova", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1210JUD001537916" }, "14": { "webcast_id": "1537916_27012021", "hearing_date": "2021-01-27 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Abdi Ibrahim v. Norway (no. 15379\/16)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "15379\/16", "case_id": "001-199382", "case_name": "CASE OF ABDI IBRAHIM v. NORWAY", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-199382", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2019-12-17 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "5", "issue": "", "represented_by": "LUTINA A.", "respondent": "NOR", "articles": "8;8-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for family life)", "separate_opinion": "FALSE", "judges": "Egidijus K\u016bris;Marko Bo\u0161njak;Robert Spano", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1217JUD001537916" }, "15": { "webcast_id": "1537916_27012021", "hearing_date": "2021-01-27 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Abdi Ibrahim v. Norway (no. 15379\/16)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "15379\/16", "case_id": "001-167625", "case_name": "ABDI IBRAHIM v. NORWAY", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-167625", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "", "respondent": "NOR", "articles": "8;8-1;9;9-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Communicated", "separate_opinion": "", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "16": { "webcast_id": "2849215_20012021", "hearing_date": "2021-01-20 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Khasanov and Rakhmanov v. Russia (nos. 28492\/15 and 49975\/15)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "28492\/15", "case_id": "001-217061", "case_name": "CASE OF KHASANOV AND RAKHMANOV v. RUSSIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-217061", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2022-04-29 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "", "represented_by": "YERMOLAYEVA N. ; ZHARINOV K. ; TRENINA D. ; DAVIDYAN E.", "respondent": "RUS", "articles": "3", "strasbourg_caselaw": "A. v. Switzerland, no. 60342\/16, 19 December 2017;A.M. v. France, no. 12148\/18, \u00a7\u00a7 120-26, 29 April 2019;A.S. v. France, no. 46240\/15, 19 April 2018;A.S.N. and Others v. the Netherlands, nos. 68377\/17 and 530\/18, 25 February 2020;Abdulaziz, Cabales and Balkandali v. the United Kingdom, 28 May 1985, \u00a7 67, Series A no. 94;Boujlifa v. France, 21 October 1997, \u00a7 42, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997 VI;Chahal v. the United Kingdom, 15 November 1996, Reports 1996 V;Dzhaksybergenov v. Ukraine, no. 12343\/10, 10 February 2011;F.G. v. Sweden [GC], no. 43611\/11, 23 March 2016;Gayratbek Saliyev v. Russia, no. 39093\/13, 17 April 2014;Giuliani and Gaggio v. Italy [GC], no. 23458\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 179-80, ECHR 2011;H.L.R. v. France, 29 April 1997, \u00a7 37, Reports 1997 III;Hilal v. the United Kingdom, no. 45276\/99, \u00a7 60, ECHR 2001 II;Hirsi Jamaa and Others v. Italy [GC], no. 27765\/09, ECHR 2012;J.K. and Others v. Sweden [GC], no. 59166\/12, \u00a7\u00a7 103-05, 23 August 2016;Kadirzhanov and Mamashev v. Russia, no. 42351\/13, 17 July 2014;Khamrakulov v. Russia, no. 68894\/13, 16 April 2015;M.S.S. v. Belgium and Greece [GC], no. 30696\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 286 87, ECHR 2011;Makhmudzhan Ergashev v. Russia, no. 49747\/11, 16 October 2012;Mamadaliyev v. Russia, no. 5614\/13, 24 July 2014;Maslov v. Austria [GC], no. 1638\/03, \u00a7\u00a7 87-95, ECHR 2008;N. v. Finland, no. 38885\/02, \u00a7 167, 26 July 2005;NA. v. the United Kingdom, no. 25904\/07, 17 July 2008;Nabid Abdullayev v. Russia, no. 8474\/14, 15 October 2015;Nizomkhon Dzhurayev v. Russia, no. 31890\/11, 3 October 2013;Othman (Abu Qatada) v. the United Kingdom, no. 8139\/09, \u00a7 192, ECHR 2012;R. v. Russia, no. 11916\/15, 26 January 2016;R.C. v. Sweden, no. 41827\/07, \u00a7 52, 9 March 2010;Saadi v. Italy [GC], no. 37201\/06, ECHR 2008;Said v. the Netherlands, no. 2345\/02, \u00a7 49, ECHR 2005 VI;Salah Sheekh v. the Netherlands, no. 1948\/04, 11 January 2007;Savriddin Dzhurayev v. Russia, no. 71386\/10, \u00a7\u00a7 70-75, ECHR 2013;Shamayev and Others v. Georgia and Russia, no. 36378\/02, \u00a7 337, ECHR 2005 III;Sufi and Elmi v. the United Kingdom, nos. 8319\/07 and 11449\/07, 28 June 2011;Tadzhibayev v. Russia, no. 17724\/14, 1 December 2015;Turgunov v. Russia, no. 15590\/14, 22 October 2015;\u00dcner v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 46410\/99, \u00a7 54, ECHR 2006-XII;Vilvarajah and Others v. the United Kingdom, 30 October 1991, \u00a7\u00a7 107-08, Series A no. 215;X v. Sweden, no. 36417\/16, \u00a7\u00a7 26-31, 52, 9 January 2018", "external_sources": "Concluding observations of the United Nations Human Rights Committee of 23 April 2014 on the second periodic report of Kyrgyzstan;Third periodic report by Kyrgyzstan under Article 40 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights received by the United Nations Human Rights Committee on 25 February 2020;Amnesty International 2019 report on \u201cHuman Rights in Eastern Europe and Central Asia\u201d;Human Rights Watch \u201cWorld Report 2020\u201d;Freedom House \u201cFreedom in the World\u201d 2020 report;Submission of the Coalition Against Torture in Kyrgyzstan to the 35th Session of the United Nations Universal Periodic Review (UPR) Working Group in July 2019;Submission of the OPZO Spravedlivost Jalal-Abad Human Rights Organization to the third cycle of the United Nations Universal Periodic Review (UPR )on Kyrgyzstan considered on 20 January 2020;2019 Annual Report on Human Rights and Democracy of the European Union - country update on Kyrgyzstan;Report of the United Nations Subcommittee on Prevention of Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, following visit to Kyrgyzstan on 11-22 September 2018 (CAT\/OP\/KGZ\/2);Report of April 2020 of Bir Duino- Kyrgyzstan", "conclusion": "No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Extradition) (Conditional) (Kyrgyzstan)", "separate_opinion": "FALSE", "judges": "Alena Pol\u00e1\u010dkov\u00e1;Ale\u0161 Pejchal;Carlo Ranzoni;Dmitry Dedov;Ganna Yudkivska;Helen Keller;Jon Fridrik Kj\u00f8lbro;Paul Lemmens;Pauliine Koskelo;Robert Spano;S\u00edofra O'Leary;Yonko Grozev;Ksenija Turkovi\u0107;Mar\u00eda El\u00f3segui;Tim Eicke", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0429JUD002849215" }, "17": { "webcast_id": "2849215_20012021", "hearing_date": "2021-01-20 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Khasanov and Rakhmanov v. Russia (nos. 28492\/15 and 49975\/15)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "28492\/15", "case_id": "001-198477", "case_name": "CASE OF T.K. AND S.R. v. RUSSIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-198477", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2019-11-19 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 3, "court": "6", "issue": "", "represented_by": "YERMOLAYEVA N.", "respondent": "RUS", "articles": "3", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Abdulaziz, Cabales and Balkandali v. the United Kingdom, 28 May 1985, \u00a7 67, Series A no. 94;Dzhaksybergenov v. Ukraine, no. 12343\/10, \u00a7\u00a7 36-38, 10 February 2011;F.G. v. Sweden [GC], no. 43611\/11, \u00a7\u00a7 111-130, ECHR 2016;Gayratbek Saliyev v. Russia, no. 39093\/13, \u00a7\u00a7 61-62, 17 April 2014;H.L.R. v. France, 29 April 1997, \u00a7 41, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997 III;J.K. and Others v. Sweden [GC], no. 59166\/12, \u00a7\u00a7 77-105, ECHR 2016;Kadirzhanov and Mamashev v. Russia, nos. 42351\/13 and 47823\/13, \u00a7\u00a7 96-97, 17 July 2014;Khamrakulov v. Russia, no. 68894\/13, \u00a7 69, 16 April 2015;L.M. and Others v. Russia, nos. 40081\/14 and 2 others, \u00a7 108, 15 October 2015;Makhmudzhan Ergashev v. Russia, no. 49747\/11, \u00a7\u00a7 69-73, 16 October 2012;Mamatkulov and Askarov v. Turkey [GC], nos. 46827\/99 and 46951\/99, \u00a7 67, ECHR 2005 I;Mamazhonov v. Russia, no.17239\/13, \u00a7\u00a7 127-135 and 141, 23 October 2014;Othman (Abu Qatada) v. the United Kingdom, no. 8139\/09, \u00a7 188, 17 January 2012;S.H. v. the United Kingdom, no. 19956\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 69-71, 15 June 2010;Saadi v. Italy [GC], no. 37201\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 125 and 148, ECHR 2008;Shamayev and Others v. Georgia and Russia, no. 36378\/02, \u00a7 337, ECHR 2005 III;Soering v. the United Kingdom, 7 July 1989, \u00a7 91, Series A no. 161;Sufi and Elmi v. the United Kingdom, nos. 8319\/07 and 11449\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 216 and 218, 28 June 2011;Turgunov v. Russia, no. 15590\/14, \u00a7 32, 22 October 2015", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Extradition) (Conditional) (Kyrgyzstan)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Alena Pol\u00e1\u010dkov\u00e1;Dmitry Dedov;Helen Keller;Paul Lemmens;Mar\u00eda El\u00f3segui", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1119JUD002849215" }, "18": { "webcast_id": "2849215_20012021", "hearing_date": "2021-01-20 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Khasanov and Rakhmanov v. Russia (nos. 28492\/15 and 49975\/15)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "49975\/15", "case_id": "001-217061", "case_name": "CASE OF KHASANOV AND RAKHMANOV v. RUSSIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-217061", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2022-04-29 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "", "represented_by": "YERMOLAYEVA N. ; ZHARINOV K. ; TRENINA D. ; DAVIDYAN E.", "respondent": "RUS", "articles": "3", "strasbourg_caselaw": "A. v. Switzerland, no. 60342\/16, 19 December 2017;A.M. v. France, no. 12148\/18, \u00a7\u00a7 120-26, 29 April 2019;A.S. v. France, no. 46240\/15, 19 April 2018;A.S.N. and Others v. the Netherlands, nos. 68377\/17 and 530\/18, 25 February 2020;Abdulaziz, Cabales and Balkandali v. the United Kingdom, 28 May 1985, \u00a7 67, Series A no. 94;Boujlifa v. France, 21 October 1997, \u00a7 42, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997 VI;Chahal v. the United Kingdom, 15 November 1996, Reports 1996 V;Dzhaksybergenov v. Ukraine, no. 12343\/10, 10 February 2011;F.G. v. Sweden [GC], no. 43611\/11, 23 March 2016;Gayratbek Saliyev v. Russia, no. 39093\/13, 17 April 2014;Giuliani and Gaggio v. Italy [GC], no. 23458\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 179-80, ECHR 2011;H.L.R. v. France, 29 April 1997, \u00a7 37, Reports 1997 III;Hilal v. the United Kingdom, no. 45276\/99, \u00a7 60, ECHR 2001 II;Hirsi Jamaa and Others v. Italy [GC], no. 27765\/09, ECHR 2012;J.K. and Others v. Sweden [GC], no. 59166\/12, \u00a7\u00a7 103-05, 23 August 2016;Kadirzhanov and Mamashev v. Russia, no. 42351\/13, 17 July 2014;Khamrakulov v. Russia, no. 68894\/13, 16 April 2015;M.S.S. v. Belgium and Greece [GC], no. 30696\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 286 87, ECHR 2011;Makhmudzhan Ergashev v. Russia, no. 49747\/11, 16 October 2012;Mamadaliyev v. Russia, no. 5614\/13, 24 July 2014;Maslov v. Austria [GC], no. 1638\/03, \u00a7\u00a7 87-95, ECHR 2008;N. v. Finland, no. 38885\/02, \u00a7 167, 26 July 2005;NA. v. the United Kingdom, no. 25904\/07, 17 July 2008;Nabid Abdullayev v. Russia, no. 8474\/14, 15 October 2015;Nizomkhon Dzhurayev v. Russia, no. 31890\/11, 3 October 2013;Othman (Abu Qatada) v. the United Kingdom, no. 8139\/09, \u00a7 192, ECHR 2012;R. v. Russia, no. 11916\/15, 26 January 2016;R.C. v. Sweden, no. 41827\/07, \u00a7 52, 9 March 2010;Saadi v. Italy [GC], no. 37201\/06, ECHR 2008;Said v. the Netherlands, no. 2345\/02, \u00a7 49, ECHR 2005 VI;Salah Sheekh v. the Netherlands, no. 1948\/04, 11 January 2007;Savriddin Dzhurayev v. Russia, no. 71386\/10, \u00a7\u00a7 70-75, ECHR 2013;Shamayev and Others v. Georgia and Russia, no. 36378\/02, \u00a7 337, ECHR 2005 III;Sufi and Elmi v. the United Kingdom, nos. 8319\/07 and 11449\/07, 28 June 2011;Tadzhibayev v. Russia, no. 17724\/14, 1 December 2015;Turgunov v. Russia, no. 15590\/14, 22 October 2015;\u00dcner v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 46410\/99, \u00a7 54, ECHR 2006-XII;Vilvarajah and Others v. the United Kingdom, 30 October 1991, \u00a7\u00a7 107-08, Series A no. 215;X v. Sweden, no. 36417\/16, \u00a7\u00a7 26-31, 52, 9 January 2018", "external_sources": "Concluding observations of the United Nations Human Rights Committee of 23 April 2014 on the second periodic report of Kyrgyzstan;Third periodic report by Kyrgyzstan under Article 40 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights received by the United Nations Human Rights Committee on 25 February 2020;Amnesty International 2019 report on \u201cHuman Rights in Eastern Europe and Central Asia\u201d;Human Rights Watch \u201cWorld Report 2020\u201d;Freedom House \u201cFreedom in the World\u201d 2020 report;Submission of the Coalition Against Torture in Kyrgyzstan to the 35th Session of the United Nations Universal Periodic Review (UPR) Working Group in July 2019;Submission of the OPZO Spravedlivost Jalal-Abad Human Rights Organization to the third cycle of the United Nations Universal Periodic Review (UPR )on Kyrgyzstan considered on 20 January 2020;2019 Annual Report on Human Rights and Democracy of the European Union - country update on Kyrgyzstan;Report of the United Nations Subcommittee on Prevention of Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, following visit to Kyrgyzstan on 11-22 September 2018 (CAT\/OP\/KGZ\/2);Report of April 2020 of Bir Duino- Kyrgyzstan", "conclusion": "No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Extradition) (Conditional) (Kyrgyzstan)", "separate_opinion": "FALSE", "judges": "Alena Pol\u00e1\u010dkov\u00e1;Ale\u0161 Pejchal;Carlo Ranzoni;Dmitry Dedov;Ganna Yudkivska;Helen Keller;Jon Fridrik Kj\u00f8lbro;Paul Lemmens;Pauliine Koskelo;Robert Spano;S\u00edofra O'Leary;Yonko Grozev;Ksenija Turkovi\u0107;Mar\u00eda El\u00f3segui;Tim Eicke", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0429JUD002849215" }, "19": { "webcast_id": "2849215_20012021", "hearing_date": "2021-01-20 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Khasanov and Rakhmanov v. Russia (nos. 28492\/15 and 49975\/15)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "49975\/15", "case_id": "001-198477", "case_name": "CASE OF T.K. AND S.R. v. RUSSIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-198477", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2019-11-19 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 3, "court": "6", "issue": "", "represented_by": "YERMOLAYEVA N.", "respondent": "RUS", "articles": "3", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Abdulaziz, Cabales and Balkandali v. the United Kingdom, 28 May 1985, \u00a7 67, Series A no. 94;Dzhaksybergenov v. Ukraine, no. 12343\/10, \u00a7\u00a7 36-38, 10 February 2011;F.G. v. Sweden [GC], no. 43611\/11, \u00a7\u00a7 111-130, ECHR 2016;Gayratbek Saliyev v. Russia, no. 39093\/13, \u00a7\u00a7 61-62, 17 April 2014;H.L.R. v. France, 29 April 1997, \u00a7 41, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997 III;J.K. and Others v. Sweden [GC], no. 59166\/12, \u00a7\u00a7 77-105, ECHR 2016;Kadirzhanov and Mamashev v. Russia, nos. 42351\/13 and 47823\/13, \u00a7\u00a7 96-97, 17 July 2014;Khamrakulov v. Russia, no. 68894\/13, \u00a7 69, 16 April 2015;L.M. and Others v. Russia, nos. 40081\/14 and 2 others, \u00a7 108, 15 October 2015;Makhmudzhan Ergashev v. Russia, no. 49747\/11, \u00a7\u00a7 69-73, 16 October 2012;Mamatkulov and Askarov v. Turkey [GC], nos. 46827\/99 and 46951\/99, \u00a7 67, ECHR 2005 I;Mamazhonov v. Russia, no.17239\/13, \u00a7\u00a7 127-135 and 141, 23 October 2014;Othman (Abu Qatada) v. the United Kingdom, no. 8139\/09, \u00a7 188, 17 January 2012;S.H. v. the United Kingdom, no. 19956\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 69-71, 15 June 2010;Saadi v. Italy [GC], no. 37201\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 125 and 148, ECHR 2008;Shamayev and Others v. Georgia and Russia, no. 36378\/02, \u00a7 337, ECHR 2005 III;Soering v. the United Kingdom, 7 July 1989, \u00a7 91, Series A no. 161;Sufi and Elmi v. the United Kingdom, nos. 8319\/07 and 11449\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 216 and 218, 28 June 2011;Turgunov v. Russia, no. 15590\/14, \u00a7 32, 22 October 2015", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Extradition) (Conditional) (Kyrgyzstan)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Alena Pol\u00e1\u010dkov\u00e1;Dmitry Dedov;Helen Keller;Paul Lemmens;Mar\u00eda El\u00f3segui", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1119JUD002849215" }, "20": { "webcast_id": "2849215_20012021", "hearing_date": "2021-01-20 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Khasanov and Rakhmanov v. Russia (nos. 28492\/15 and 49975\/15)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "49975\/15", "case_id": "001-161859", "case_name": "S.R. v. RUSSIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-161859", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "YERMOLAYEVA N.", "respondent": "RUS", "articles": "3", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Communicated", "separate_opinion": "", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "21": { "webcast_id": "6281917_21102020", "hearing_date": "2020-10-21 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Denis and Irvine v. Belgium (nos. 62819\/17 and 63921\/17)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "62819\/17", "case_id": "001-210363", "case_name": "CASE OF DENIS AND IRVINE v. BELGIUM", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-210363", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2021-06-01 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Social Protection Act of 9 April 1930 ; Compulsory Confinement Act of 5 May 2014 ; Compulsory Confinement and Justice Law of 4 May 2016 ; Law of 26 June 1990 on the protection of persons of unsound mind\n", "represented_by": "VERPOORTEN P.", "respondent": "BEL", "articles": "5;5-1;5-1-e;5-4", "strasbourg_caselaw": "A. and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 3455\/05, \u00a7 202, ECHR 2009;Aerts v. Belgium, 30 July 1998, \u00a7 45, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 V;Baranowski v. Poland, no 28358\/95, \u00a7 52, ECHR 2000 III;Benham v. the United Kingdom, 10 June 1996, \u00a7 41, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 III;Buzadji v. the Republic of Moldova [GC], no 23755\/07, 5 July 2016;Claes v. Belgium, no 43418\/09, \u00a7 110, 10 January 2013;Creang\u0103 v. Romania [GC], no 29226\/03, \u00a7 101, 23 February 2012;De Donder and De Clippel v. Belgium, no 8595\/06, \u00a7 105, 6 December 2011;De Schepper v. Belgium, no 27428\/07, \u00a7 39, 13 October 2009;Del R\u00edo Prada v. Spain [GC], no 42750\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 123-124, ECHR 2013;Douiyeb v. the Netherlands [GC], no 31464\/96, \u00a7 57, 4 August 1999;Enhorn v. Sweden, no 56529\/00, \u00a7 36, ECHR 2005-I;Gorzelik and Others v. Poland [GC], no 44158\/98, \u00a7 67, ECHR 2004 I;Idalov v. Russia [GC], no 5826\/03, \u00a7 154, 22 May 2012;Ilias and Ahmed v. Hungary [GC], no 47287\/15, \u00a7\u00a7 171 172 and 177, 21 November 2019;Ilnseher v. Germany [GC], nos. 10211\/12 and 27505\/14, 4 December 2018;J\u0117\u010dius v. Lithuania, no 34578\/97, \u00a7 68, ECHR 2000 IX;Khlaifia and Others v. Italy [GC], no 16483\/12, 15 December 2016;Magyar Helsinki Bizotts\u00e1g v. Hungary [GC], no 18030\/11, \u00a7 184, 8 November 2016;Magyar K\u00e9tfark\u00fa Kutya P\u00e1rt v. Hungary [GC], no 201\/17, \u00a7 95, 20 January 2020;Merabishvili v. Georgia [GC], no 72508\/13, 28 November 2017;Mooren v. Germany [GC], no 11364\/03, 9 July 2009;Nevmerzhitsky v. Ukraine, no 54825\/00, \u00a7 116, ECHR 2005 II (extracts);Paradiso and Campanelli v. Italy [GC], no 25358\/12, \u00a7 180, 24 January 2017;Ples\u00f3 v. Hungary, no 41242\/08, \u00a7 59, 2 October 2012;Radomilja and Others v. Croatia [GC], nos. 37685\/10 and 22768\/12, 20 March 2018;Rooman v. Belgium [GC], no 18052\/11, 31 January 2019;S., V. and A. v. Denmark [GC], nos. 35553\/12 and 2 others, 22 October 2018;S.M. v. Croatia [GC], no 60561\/14, 25 June 2020;Saadi v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 13229\/03, \u00a7 67, ECHR 2008;Simons v. Belgium (dec.), no 71407\/10, 28 August 2012;Stanev v. Bulgaria [GC], no 36760\/06, \u00a7 145, ECHR 2012;Taxquet v. Belgium [GC], no 926\/05, \u00a7 83, ECHR 2010;Van Droogenbroeck v. Belgium, 24 June 1982, Series A no 50;Van Zandbergen v. Belgium, no 4258\/11, \u00a7 37, 2 February 2016;W.D. v. Belgium, no 73548\/13, \u00a7 122, 6 September 2016;Winterwerp v. the Netherlands, 24 October 1979, \u00a7 39, Series A no 33;Witold Litwa v. Poland, no 26629\/95, \u00a7 78, ECHR 2000 III;Z.A. and Others v. Russia [GC], nos. 61411\/15 and 3 others, \u00a7 161, 21 November 2019", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "No violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Deprivation of liberty;Article 5-1-e - Persons of unsound mind);No violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Order release;Review of lawfulness of detention)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Ale\u0161 Pejchal;Carlo Ranzoni;Egidijus K\u016bris;Georgios A. Serghides;Helen Keller;Jon Fridrik Kj\u00f8lbro;Krzysztof Wojtyczek;M\u0101rti\u0146\u0161 Mits;Paul Lemmens;Robert Spano;S\u00edofra O'Leary;St\u00e9phanie Mourou-Vikstr\u00f6m;Yonko Grozev;Ksenija Turkovi\u0107", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0601JUD006281917" }, "22": { "webcast_id": "6281917_21102020", "hearing_date": "2020-10-21 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Denis and Irvine v. Belgium (nos. 62819\/17 and 63921\/17)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "62819\/17", "case_id": "001-196836", "case_name": "CASE OF DENIS AND IRVINE v. BELGIUM", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-196836", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2019-10-08 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "7", "issue": "", "represented_by": "VERPOORTEN P.", "respondent": "BEL", "articles": "5;5-1;5-4", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "No violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention);No violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Review of lawfulness of detention)", "separate_opinion": "FALSE", "judges": "Carlo Ranzoni;Jon Fridrik Kj\u00f8lbro;Paul Lemmens;St\u00e9phanie Mourou-Vikstr\u00f6m", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1008JUD006281917" }, "23": { "webcast_id": "6281917_21102020", "hearing_date": "2020-10-21 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Denis and Irvine v. Belgium (nos. 62819\/17 and 63921\/17)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "63921\/17", "case_id": "001-210363", "case_name": "CASE OF DENIS AND IRVINE v. BELGIUM", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-210363", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2021-06-01 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Social Protection Act of 9 April 1930 ; Compulsory Confinement Act of 5 May 2014 ; Compulsory Confinement and Justice Law of 4 May 2016 ; Law of 26 June 1990 on the protection of persons of unsound mind\n", "represented_by": "VERPOORTEN P.", "respondent": "BEL", "articles": "5;5-1;5-1-e;5-4", "strasbourg_caselaw": "A. and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 3455\/05, \u00a7 202, ECHR 2009;Aerts v. Belgium, 30 July 1998, \u00a7 45, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 V;Baranowski v. Poland, no 28358\/95, \u00a7 52, ECHR 2000 III;Benham v. the United Kingdom, 10 June 1996, \u00a7 41, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 III;Buzadji v. the Republic of Moldova [GC], no 23755\/07, 5 July 2016;Claes v. Belgium, no 43418\/09, \u00a7 110, 10 January 2013;Creang\u0103 v. Romania [GC], no 29226\/03, \u00a7 101, 23 February 2012;De Donder and De Clippel v. Belgium, no 8595\/06, \u00a7 105, 6 December 2011;De Schepper v. Belgium, no 27428\/07, \u00a7 39, 13 October 2009;Del R\u00edo Prada v. Spain [GC], no 42750\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 123-124, ECHR 2013;Douiyeb v. the Netherlands [GC], no 31464\/96, \u00a7 57, 4 August 1999;Enhorn v. Sweden, no 56529\/00, \u00a7 36, ECHR 2005-I;Gorzelik and Others v. Poland [GC], no 44158\/98, \u00a7 67, ECHR 2004 I;Idalov v. Russia [GC], no 5826\/03, \u00a7 154, 22 May 2012;Ilias and Ahmed v. Hungary [GC], no 47287\/15, \u00a7\u00a7 171 172 and 177, 21 November 2019;Ilnseher v. Germany [GC], nos. 10211\/12 and 27505\/14, 4 December 2018;J\u0117\u010dius v. Lithuania, no 34578\/97, \u00a7 68, ECHR 2000 IX;Khlaifia and Others v. Italy [GC], no 16483\/12, 15 December 2016;Magyar Helsinki Bizotts\u00e1g v. Hungary [GC], no 18030\/11, \u00a7 184, 8 November 2016;Magyar K\u00e9tfark\u00fa Kutya P\u00e1rt v. Hungary [GC], no 201\/17, \u00a7 95, 20 January 2020;Merabishvili v. Georgia [GC], no 72508\/13, 28 November 2017;Mooren v. Germany [GC], no 11364\/03, 9 July 2009;Nevmerzhitsky v. Ukraine, no 54825\/00, \u00a7 116, ECHR 2005 II (extracts);Paradiso and Campanelli v. Italy [GC], no 25358\/12, \u00a7 180, 24 January 2017;Ples\u00f3 v. Hungary, no 41242\/08, \u00a7 59, 2 October 2012;Radomilja and Others v. Croatia [GC], nos. 37685\/10 and 22768\/12, 20 March 2018;Rooman v. Belgium [GC], no 18052\/11, 31 January 2019;S., V. and A. v. Denmark [GC], nos. 35553\/12 and 2 others, 22 October 2018;S.M. v. Croatia [GC], no 60561\/14, 25 June 2020;Saadi v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 13229\/03, \u00a7 67, ECHR 2008;Simons v. Belgium (dec.), no 71407\/10, 28 August 2012;Stanev v. Bulgaria [GC], no 36760\/06, \u00a7 145, ECHR 2012;Taxquet v. Belgium [GC], no 926\/05, \u00a7 83, ECHR 2010;Van Droogenbroeck v. Belgium, 24 June 1982, Series A no 50;Van Zandbergen v. Belgium, no 4258\/11, \u00a7 37, 2 February 2016;W.D. v. Belgium, no 73548\/13, \u00a7 122, 6 September 2016;Winterwerp v. the Netherlands, 24 October 1979, \u00a7 39, Series A no 33;Witold Litwa v. Poland, no 26629\/95, \u00a7 78, ECHR 2000 III;Z.A. and Others v. Russia [GC], nos. 61411\/15 and 3 others, \u00a7 161, 21 November 2019", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "No violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Deprivation of liberty;Article 5-1-e - Persons of unsound mind);No violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Order release;Review of lawfulness of detention)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Ale\u0161 Pejchal;Carlo Ranzoni;Egidijus K\u016bris;Georgios A. Serghides;Helen Keller;Jon Fridrik Kj\u00f8lbro;Krzysztof Wojtyczek;M\u0101rti\u0146\u0161 Mits;Paul Lemmens;Robert Spano;S\u00edofra O'Leary;St\u00e9phanie Mourou-Vikstr\u00f6m;Yonko Grozev;Ksenija Turkovi\u0107", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0601JUD006281917" }, "24": { "webcast_id": "6281917_21102020", "hearing_date": "2020-10-21 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Denis and Irvine v. Belgium (nos. 62819\/17 and 63921\/17)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "63921\/17", "case_id": "001-196836", "case_name": "CASE OF DENIS AND IRVINE v. BELGIUM", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-196836", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2019-10-08 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "7", "issue": "", "represented_by": "VERPOORTEN P.", "respondent": "BEL", "articles": "5;5-1;5-4", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "No violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention);No violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Review of lawfulness of detention)", "separate_opinion": "FALSE", "judges": "Carlo Ranzoni;Jon Fridrik Kj\u00f8lbro;Paul Lemmens;St\u00e9phanie Mourou-Vikstr\u00f6m", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1008JUD006281917" }, "25": { "webcast_id": "2847012_14102020", "hearing_date": "2020-10-14 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "NIT S.R.L. v. the Republic of Moldova (no. 28470\/12)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "28470\/12", "case_id": "001-216872", "case_name": "CASE OF NIT S.R.L. v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-216872", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2022-04-05 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Articles 7, 10, 23, 27, 28, 38, 40 of the Audiovisual Code 2006 ; Section 21 of the Law on administrative court proceedings ; Law no. 451-XV\/2001 on regulating entrepreneurial activity through licensing\n", "represented_by": "R\u0102ILEANU A. ; CURUCI Z. ; B\u0102LAN P.", "respondent": "MDA", "articles": "10;10-1;10-2;35;35-3-a;P1-1;P1-1-2", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Animal Defenders International v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 48876\/08, ECHR 2013 (extracts);Association Ekin v. France, no. 39288\/98, \u00a7 61, ECHR 2001 VIII;ATV Zrt v. Hungary, no. 61178\/14, \u00a7 39, 28 April 2020;Axel Springer AG v. Germany [GC], no. 39954\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 87 88, 7 February 2012;B\u00e9dat v. Switzerland [GC], no. 56925\/08, \u00a7 50, 29 March 2016;B\u00e9l\u00e1n\u00e9 Nagy v. Hungary [GC], no. 53080\/13, \u00a7\u00a7 115-116, 13 December 2016;Bergens Tidende and Others v. Norway, no. 26132\/95, \u00a7 52, ECHR 2000 IV;Beyeler v. Italy [GC], no. 33202\/96, \u00a7 112, ECHR 2000 I;Bimer S.A. v. Moldova, no. 15084\/03, \u00a7 49, 10 July 2007;Bj\u00f6rk Ei\u00f0sd\u00f3ttir v. Iceland, no. 46443\/09, \u00a7 69, 10 July 2012;Bladet Troms\u00f8 and Stensaas v. Norway [GC], no. 21980\/93, ECHR 1999 III;Centre for Democracy and the Rule of Law v. Ukraine, no. 10090\/16, \u00a7 108, 26 March 2020;Couderc and Hachette Filipacchi Associ\u00e9s v. France [GC], no. 40454\/07, \u00a7 139, ECHR 2015 (extracts);Cumhuriyet Vakf\u0131 and Others v. Turkey, no. 28255\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 62 74, 8 October 2013;Cump\u01cen\u01ce and Maz\u01cere v. Romania [GC], no. 33348\/96, \u00a7\u00a7 116-119, ECHR 2004 XI;Delfi AS v. Estonia [GC], no. 64569\/09, \u00a7 120, ECHR 2015;Demuth v. Switzerland, no. 38743\/97, \u00a7 33, ECHR 2002 IX;Dmitriyevskiy v. Russia, no. 42168\/06, \u00a7 105, 3 October 2017;Fredin v. Sweden (no. 1), 18 February 1991, \u00a7\u00a7 47 and 51, Series A no. 192;Fressoz and Roire v. France [GC], no. 29183\/95, \u00a7 54, ECHR 1999 I;Gaunt v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 26448\/12, \u00a7 47, 6 September 2016;Goodwin v. the United Kingdom, 27 March 1996, \u00a7 39, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 II;Gorzelik and Others v. Poland [GC], no. 44158\/98, \u00a7 67, ECHR 2004 I;Herczegfalvy v. Austria, 24 September 1992, \u00a7 96, Series A no. 244;Informationsverein Lentia and Others v. Austria, 24 November 1993, \u00a7\u00a7 32 and 38, Series A no. 276;Jahn and Others v. Germany [GC], nos. 46720\/99 and 2 others, \u00a7\u00a7 81 94, ECHR 2005\u2011VI;James and Others v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1986, \u00a7 46, Series A no. 98;Jersild v. Denmark, 23 September 1994, \u00a7\u00a7 31-35, Series A no. 298;Kaperzy\u0144ski v. Poland, no. 43206\/07, \u00a7 66, 3 April 2012;Kar\u00e1csony and Others v. Hungary [GC], nos. 42461\/13 and 44357\/13, \u00a7\u00a7 132-136, 17 May 2016;Kud\u0142a v. Poland [GC], no. 30210\/96, \u00a7 146, ECHR 2000 XI;Kudrevi\u010dius and Others v. Lithuania [GC], no. 37553\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 110 and 115, ECHR 2015;Leyla \u015eahin v. Turkey [GC], no. 44774\/98, \u00a7 88, ECHR 2005 XI;Maestri v. Italy [GC], no. 39748\/98, \u00a7 30, ECHR 2004-I;Magyar K\u00e9tfark\u00fa Kutya P\u00e1rt v. Hungary [GC], no. 201\/17, \u00a7 94, 20 January 2020;McVicar v. the United Kingdom, no. 46311\/99, \u00a7 73, ECHR 2002-III;MGN Limited v. the United Kingdom, no. 39401\/04, \u00a7\u00a7 150 and 155, 18 January 2011;Murphy v. Ireland, no. 44179\/98, \u00a7 74, ECHR 2003-IX (extracts);Pedersen and Baadsgaard v. Denmark [GC], no. 49017\/99, \u00a7 78, ECHR 2004 XI;Radio France and Others v. France, no. 53984\/00, \u00a7 39, ECHR 2004-II;Radomilja and Others v. Croatia [GC], nos. 37685\/10 and 22768\/12, \u00a7 126, 20 March 2018;Sanoma Uitgevers B.V. v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 38224\/03, \u00a7 83, 14 September 2010;Satakunnan Markkinap\u00f6rssi Oy and Satamedia Oy v. Finland [GC], no. 931\/13, \u00a7 142, 27 June 2017;Selist\u00f6 v. Finland, no. 56767\/00, \u00a7 64, 16 November 2004;Societatea Rom\u00e2n\u0103 de Televiziune v. Moldova (dec.), no. 36398\/08, 15 October 2013;\u0160pa\u010dek, s.r.o., v. the Czech Republic, no. 26449\/95, \u00a7 57, 9 November 1999;Sporrong and L\u00f6nnroth v. Sweden, 23 September 1982, \u00a7\u00a7 69-74, Series A no. 52;Stoll v. Switzerland [GC], no. 69698\/01, \u00a7\u00a7 104-146, ECHR 2007 V;S\u00fcrek v. Turkey (no. 1) [GC], no. 26682\/95, \u00a7 61, ECHR 1999 IV;Tierbefreier E.V. v. Germany, no. 45192\/09, \u00a7 58, 16 January 2014;T\u00f8nsbergs Blad A.S. and Haukom v. Norway, no. 510\/04, \u00a7 88, 1 March 2007;Tre Trakt\u00f6rer AB v. Sweden, 7 July 1989, \u00a7\u00a7 53-55, Series A no. 159;Unifaun Theatre Productions Limited and Others v. Malta, no. 37326\/13, \u00a7 79, 15 May 2018;Urechean and Pavlicenco v. the Republic of Moldova, nos. 27756\/05 and 41219\/07, \u00a7 20, 2 December 2014;Visti\u0146\u0161 and Perepjolkins v. Latvia [GC], no. 71243\/01, \u00a7 96, 25 October 2012;Von Hannover v. Germany (no. 2) [GC], nos. 40660\/08 and 60641\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 106-07, ECHR 2012", "external_sources": "Committee of Ministers Recommendation CM\/Rec (2007)2 on media pluralism and diversity of media content", "conclusion": "Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;No violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression-{general} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression);No violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 2 of Protocol No. 1 - Control of the use of property)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Branko Lubarda;Egidijus K\u016bris;Jon Fridrik Kj\u00f8lbro;Paul Lemmens;Robert Spano;S\u00edofra O'Leary;St\u00e9phanie Mourou-Vikstr\u00f6m;Yonko Grozev;Ksenija Turkovi\u0107;Mar\u00eda El\u00f3segui", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0405JUD002847012" }, "26": { "webcast_id": "2847012_14102020", "hearing_date": "2020-10-14 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "NIT S.R.L. v. the Republic of Moldova (no. 28470\/12)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "28470\/12", "case_id": "001-182894", "case_name": "NIT S.R.L. v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-182894", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "", "respondent": "MDA", "articles": "10;10-1;P1-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Communicated", "separate_opinion": "", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "27": { "webcast_id": "4762113_01072020", "hearing_date": "2020-07-01 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Vav\u0159i\u010dka v. the Czech Republic (no. 47621\/13) and 5 other applications (nos. 3867\/14, 73094\/14, 19306\/15, 19298\/15 and 43883\/15)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "47621\/13", "case_id": "001-209039", "case_name": "CASE OF VAV\u0158I\u010cKA AND OTHERS v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-209039", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2021-04-08 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Sections 46(1),(4),(6), 50 and 80(1) of the Public Health Protection Act (Law no. 258\/2000 Coll., as amended) ; Section 29(1)(f) and (2) of the Minor Offences Act (Law no. 200\/1990 Coll., as amended) ; Section 34(5) of the Education Act (Law no. 561\/2004 Coll., as amended) ; Article 4 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights and Freedoms (Constitutional Law no. 2\/1993 Coll.) ; Civil Code (Law no. 40\/1964 Coll., as amended)", "represented_by": "CANDIGLIOTA Z.", "respondent": "CZE", "articles": "8;8-1;8-2;35;35-1;35-3-a", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Advisory opinion concerning the recognition in domestic law of a legal parent-child relationship between a child born through a gestational surrogacy arrangement abroad and the intended mother [GC], request no. P16 2018 001, French Court of Cassation, \u00a7 38, 10 April 2019;Association of Parents v. the United Kingdom, no. 7154\/75, Commission decision of 12 July 1978, DR 14;Bayatyan v. Armenia [GC], no. 23459\/03, \u00a7 110, ECHR 2011;Bayt\u00fcre and Others v. Turkey (dec.), no. 3270\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 28-30, 12 March 2013;Boffa and Others v. San Marino, no. 26536\/95, Commission decision of 15 January 1998, Decisions and Reports (DR) no. 92-B, p. 34;Budayeva and Others v. Russia, nos. 15339\/02 and 4 others, \u00a7\u00a7 128-130, ECHR 2008 (extracts);Dubsk\u00e1 and Krejzov\u00e1 v. the Czech Republic [GC], nos. 28859\/11 and 28473\/12, 15 November 2016;Evans v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 6339\/05, \u00a7 77, ECHR 2007 I;Furd\u00edk v. Slovakia (dec.), no. 42994\/05, 2 December 2008;Hristozov and Others v. Bulgaria, nos. 47039\/11 and 358\/12, ECHR 2012 (extracts);\u0130brahim Keskin v. Turkey, no. 10491\/12, \u00a7 62, 27 March 2018;Kotilainen and Others v. Finland, no. 62439\/12, \u00a7\u00a7 78 et seq., 17 September 2020;L.C.B. v. the United Kingdom, 9 June 1998, \u00a7 36, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 III;Molla Sali v. Greece [GC], no. 20452\/14, \u00a7 85, 19 December 2018;Neulinger and Shuruk v. Switzerland [GC], no. 41615\/07, \u00a7 135, ECHR 2010;Paradiso and Campanelli v. Italy [GC], no. 25358\/12, 24 January 2017;Pretty v. the United Kingdom, no. 2346\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 82-3, ECHR 2002 III;Radomilja and Others v. Croatia [GC], nos. 37685\/10 and 22768\/12, \u00a7\u00a7 123-126, 20 March 2018;Sanoma Uitgevers B.V. v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 38224\/03, \u00a7 83, 14 September 2010;Solomakhin v. Ukraine, no. 24429\/03, 15 March 2012", "external_sources": "Resolution 1845(2011) of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe on \u201cFundamental rights and responsibilities\u201d;International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights;Convention on the Rights of the Child;European Social Charter;General Comment No. 15 of the United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child on \u201cthe right of the child to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of health\u201d of 17 April 2013 (CRC\/C\/GC\/15)", "conclusion": "Preliminary objection joined to merits (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Ale\u0161 Pejchal;Armen Harutyunyan;Jon Fridrik Kj\u00f8lbro;Krzysztof Wojtyczek;Marko Bo\u0161njak;Paul Lemmens;Robert Spano;S\u00edofra O'Leary;Yonko Grozev;Ksenija Turkovi\u0107;Pere Pastor Vilanova;Tim Eicke", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0408JUD004762113" }, "28": { "webcast_id": "4762113_01072020", "hearing_date": "2020-07-01 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Vav\u0159i\u010dka v. the Czech Republic (no. 47621\/13) and 5 other applications (nos. 3867\/14, 73094\/14, 19306\/15, 19298\/15 and 43883\/15)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "3867\/14", "case_id": "001-209039", "case_name": "CASE OF VAV\u0158I\u010cKA AND OTHERS v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-209039", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2021-04-08 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Sections 46(1),(4),(6), 50 and 80(1) of the Public Health Protection Act (Law no. 258\/2000 Coll., as amended) ; Section 29(1)(f) and (2) of the Minor Offences Act (Law no. 200\/1990 Coll., as amended) ; Section 34(5) of the Education Act (Law no. 561\/2004 Coll., as amended) ; Article 4 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights and Freedoms (Constitutional Law no. 2\/1993 Coll.) ; Civil Code (Law no. 40\/1964 Coll., as amended)", "represented_by": "CANDIGLIOTA Z.", "respondent": "CZE", "articles": "8;8-1;8-2;35;35-1;35-3-a", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Advisory opinion concerning the recognition in domestic law of a legal parent-child relationship between a child born through a gestational surrogacy arrangement abroad and the intended mother [GC], request no. P16 2018 001, French Court of Cassation, \u00a7 38, 10 April 2019;Association of Parents v. the United Kingdom, no. 7154\/75, Commission decision of 12 July 1978, DR 14;Bayatyan v. Armenia [GC], no. 23459\/03, \u00a7 110, ECHR 2011;Bayt\u00fcre and Others v. Turkey (dec.), no. 3270\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 28-30, 12 March 2013;Boffa and Others v. San Marino, no. 26536\/95, Commission decision of 15 January 1998, Decisions and Reports (DR) no. 92-B, p. 34;Budayeva and Others v. Russia, nos. 15339\/02 and 4 others, \u00a7\u00a7 128-130, ECHR 2008 (extracts);Dubsk\u00e1 and Krejzov\u00e1 v. the Czech Republic [GC], nos. 28859\/11 and 28473\/12, 15 November 2016;Evans v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 6339\/05, \u00a7 77, ECHR 2007 I;Furd\u00edk v. Slovakia (dec.), no. 42994\/05, 2 December 2008;Hristozov and Others v. Bulgaria, nos. 47039\/11 and 358\/12, ECHR 2012 (extracts);\u0130brahim Keskin v. Turkey, no. 10491\/12, \u00a7 62, 27 March 2018;Kotilainen and Others v. Finland, no. 62439\/12, \u00a7\u00a7 78 et seq., 17 September 2020;L.C.B. v. the United Kingdom, 9 June 1998, \u00a7 36, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 III;Molla Sali v. Greece [GC], no. 20452\/14, \u00a7 85, 19 December 2018;Neulinger and Shuruk v. Switzerland [GC], no. 41615\/07, \u00a7 135, ECHR 2010;Paradiso and Campanelli v. Italy [GC], no. 25358\/12, 24 January 2017;Pretty v. the United Kingdom, no. 2346\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 82-3, ECHR 2002 III;Radomilja and Others v. Croatia [GC], nos. 37685\/10 and 22768\/12, \u00a7\u00a7 123-126, 20 March 2018;Sanoma Uitgevers B.V. v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 38224\/03, \u00a7 83, 14 September 2010;Solomakhin v. Ukraine, no. 24429\/03, 15 March 2012", "external_sources": "Resolution 1845(2011) of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe on \u201cFundamental rights and responsibilities\u201d;International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights;Convention on the Rights of the Child;European Social Charter;General Comment No. 15 of the United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child on \u201cthe right of the child to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of health\u201d of 17 April 2013 (CRC\/C\/GC\/15)", "conclusion": "Preliminary objection joined to merits (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Ale\u0161 Pejchal;Armen Harutyunyan;Jon Fridrik Kj\u00f8lbro;Krzysztof Wojtyczek;Marko Bo\u0161njak;Paul Lemmens;Robert Spano;S\u00edofra O'Leary;Yonko Grozev;Ksenija Turkovi\u0107;Pere Pastor Vilanova;Tim Eicke", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0408JUD004762113" }, "29": { "webcast_id": "4762113_01072020", "hearing_date": "2020-07-01 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Vav\u0159i\u010dka v. the Czech Republic (no. 47621\/13) and 5 other applications (nos. 3867\/14, 73094\/14, 19306\/15, 19298\/15 and 43883\/15)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "73094\/14", "case_id": "001-209039", "case_name": "CASE OF VAV\u0158I\u010cKA AND OTHERS v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-209039", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2021-04-08 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Sections 46(1),(4),(6), 50 and 80(1) of the Public Health Protection Act (Law no. 258\/2000 Coll., as amended) ; Section 29(1)(f) and (2) of the Minor Offences Act (Law no. 200\/1990 Coll., as amended) ; Section 34(5) of the Education Act (Law no. 561\/2004 Coll., as amended) ; Article 4 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights and Freedoms (Constitutional Law no. 2\/1993 Coll.) ; Civil Code (Law no. 40\/1964 Coll., as amended)", "represented_by": "CANDIGLIOTA Z.", "respondent": "CZE", "articles": "8;8-1;8-2;35;35-1;35-3-a", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Advisory opinion concerning the recognition in domestic law of a legal parent-child relationship between a child born through a gestational surrogacy arrangement abroad and the intended mother [GC], request no. P16 2018 001, French Court of Cassation, \u00a7 38, 10 April 2019;Association of Parents v. the United Kingdom, no. 7154\/75, Commission decision of 12 July 1978, DR 14;Bayatyan v. Armenia [GC], no. 23459\/03, \u00a7 110, ECHR 2011;Bayt\u00fcre and Others v. Turkey (dec.), no. 3270\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 28-30, 12 March 2013;Boffa and Others v. San Marino, no. 26536\/95, Commission decision of 15 January 1998, Decisions and Reports (DR) no. 92-B, p. 34;Budayeva and Others v. Russia, nos. 15339\/02 and 4 others, \u00a7\u00a7 128-130, ECHR 2008 (extracts);Dubsk\u00e1 and Krejzov\u00e1 v. the Czech Republic [GC], nos. 28859\/11 and 28473\/12, 15 November 2016;Evans v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 6339\/05, \u00a7 77, ECHR 2007 I;Furd\u00edk v. Slovakia (dec.), no. 42994\/05, 2 December 2008;Hristozov and Others v. Bulgaria, nos. 47039\/11 and 358\/12, ECHR 2012 (extracts);\u0130brahim Keskin v. Turkey, no. 10491\/12, \u00a7 62, 27 March 2018;Kotilainen and Others v. Finland, no. 62439\/12, \u00a7\u00a7 78 et seq., 17 September 2020;L.C.B. v. the United Kingdom, 9 June 1998, \u00a7 36, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 III;Molla Sali v. Greece [GC], no. 20452\/14, \u00a7 85, 19 December 2018;Neulinger and Shuruk v. Switzerland [GC], no. 41615\/07, \u00a7 135, ECHR 2010;Paradiso and Campanelli v. Italy [GC], no. 25358\/12, 24 January 2017;Pretty v. the United Kingdom, no. 2346\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 82-3, ECHR 2002 III;Radomilja and Others v. Croatia [GC], nos. 37685\/10 and 22768\/12, \u00a7\u00a7 123-126, 20 March 2018;Sanoma Uitgevers B.V. v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 38224\/03, \u00a7 83, 14 September 2010;Solomakhin v. Ukraine, no. 24429\/03, 15 March 2012", "external_sources": "Resolution 1845(2011) of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe on \u201cFundamental rights and responsibilities\u201d;International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights;Convention on the Rights of the Child;European Social Charter;General Comment No. 15 of the United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child on \u201cthe right of the child to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of health\u201d of 17 April 2013 (CRC\/C\/GC\/15)", "conclusion": "Preliminary objection joined to merits (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Ale\u0161 Pejchal;Armen Harutyunyan;Jon Fridrik Kj\u00f8lbro;Krzysztof Wojtyczek;Marko Bo\u0161njak;Paul Lemmens;Robert Spano;S\u00edofra O'Leary;Yonko Grozev;Ksenija Turkovi\u0107;Pere Pastor Vilanova;Tim Eicke", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0408JUD004762113" }, "30": { "webcast_id": "4762113_01072020", "hearing_date": "2020-07-01 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Vav\u0159i\u010dka v. the Czech Republic (no. 47621\/13) and 5 other applications (nos. 3867\/14, 73094\/14, 19306\/15, 19298\/15 and 43883\/15)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "19306\/15", "case_id": "001-209039", "case_name": "CASE OF VAV\u0158I\u010cKA AND OTHERS v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-209039", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2021-04-08 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Sections 46(1),(4),(6), 50 and 80(1) of the Public Health Protection Act (Law no. 258\/2000 Coll., as amended) ; Section 29(1)(f) and (2) of the Minor Offences Act (Law no. 200\/1990 Coll., as amended) ; Section 34(5) of the Education Act (Law no. 561\/2004 Coll., as amended) ; Article 4 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights and Freedoms (Constitutional Law no. 2\/1993 Coll.) ; Civil Code (Law no. 40\/1964 Coll., as amended)", "represented_by": "CANDIGLIOTA Z.", "respondent": "CZE", "articles": "8;8-1;8-2;35;35-1;35-3-a", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Advisory opinion concerning the recognition in domestic law of a legal parent-child relationship between a child born through a gestational surrogacy arrangement abroad and the intended mother [GC], request no. P16 2018 001, French Court of Cassation, \u00a7 38, 10 April 2019;Association of Parents v. the United Kingdom, no. 7154\/75, Commission decision of 12 July 1978, DR 14;Bayatyan v. Armenia [GC], no. 23459\/03, \u00a7 110, ECHR 2011;Bayt\u00fcre and Others v. Turkey (dec.), no. 3270\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 28-30, 12 March 2013;Boffa and Others v. San Marino, no. 26536\/95, Commission decision of 15 January 1998, Decisions and Reports (DR) no. 92-B, p. 34;Budayeva and Others v. Russia, nos. 15339\/02 and 4 others, \u00a7\u00a7 128-130, ECHR 2008 (extracts);Dubsk\u00e1 and Krejzov\u00e1 v. the Czech Republic [GC], nos. 28859\/11 and 28473\/12, 15 November 2016;Evans v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 6339\/05, \u00a7 77, ECHR 2007 I;Furd\u00edk v. Slovakia (dec.), no. 42994\/05, 2 December 2008;Hristozov and Others v. Bulgaria, nos. 47039\/11 and 358\/12, ECHR 2012 (extracts);\u0130brahim Keskin v. Turkey, no. 10491\/12, \u00a7 62, 27 March 2018;Kotilainen and Others v. Finland, no. 62439\/12, \u00a7\u00a7 78 et seq., 17 September 2020;L.C.B. v. the United Kingdom, 9 June 1998, \u00a7 36, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 III;Molla Sali v. Greece [GC], no. 20452\/14, \u00a7 85, 19 December 2018;Neulinger and Shuruk v. Switzerland [GC], no. 41615\/07, \u00a7 135, ECHR 2010;Paradiso and Campanelli v. Italy [GC], no. 25358\/12, 24 January 2017;Pretty v. the United Kingdom, no. 2346\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 82-3, ECHR 2002 III;Radomilja and Others v. Croatia [GC], nos. 37685\/10 and 22768\/12, \u00a7\u00a7 123-126, 20 March 2018;Sanoma Uitgevers B.V. v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 38224\/03, \u00a7 83, 14 September 2010;Solomakhin v. Ukraine, no. 24429\/03, 15 March 2012", "external_sources": "Resolution 1845(2011) of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe on \u201cFundamental rights and responsibilities\u201d;International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights;Convention on the Rights of the Child;European Social Charter;General Comment No. 15 of the United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child on \u201cthe right of the child to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of health\u201d of 17 April 2013 (CRC\/C\/GC\/15)", "conclusion": "Preliminary objection joined to merits (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Ale\u0161 Pejchal;Armen Harutyunyan;Jon Fridrik Kj\u00f8lbro;Krzysztof Wojtyczek;Marko Bo\u0161njak;Paul Lemmens;Robert Spano;S\u00edofra O'Leary;Yonko Grozev;Ksenija Turkovi\u0107;Pere Pastor Vilanova;Tim Eicke", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0408JUD004762113" }, "31": { "webcast_id": "4762113_01072020", "hearing_date": "2020-07-01 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Vav\u0159i\u010dka v. the Czech Republic (no. 47621\/13) and 5 other applications (nos. 3867\/14, 73094\/14, 19306\/15, 19298\/15 and 43883\/15)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "19298\/15", "case_id": "001-209039", "case_name": "CASE OF VAV\u0158I\u010cKA AND OTHERS v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-209039", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2021-04-08 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Sections 46(1),(4),(6), 50 and 80(1) of the Public Health Protection Act (Law no. 258\/2000 Coll., as amended) ; Section 29(1)(f) and (2) of the Minor Offences Act (Law no. 200\/1990 Coll., as amended) ; Section 34(5) of the Education Act (Law no. 561\/2004 Coll., as amended) ; Article 4 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights and Freedoms (Constitutional Law no. 2\/1993 Coll.) ; Civil Code (Law no. 40\/1964 Coll., as amended)", "represented_by": "CANDIGLIOTA Z.", "respondent": "CZE", "articles": "8;8-1;8-2;35;35-1;35-3-a", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Advisory opinion concerning the recognition in domestic law of a legal parent-child relationship between a child born through a gestational surrogacy arrangement abroad and the intended mother [GC], request no. P16 2018 001, French Court of Cassation, \u00a7 38, 10 April 2019;Association of Parents v. the United Kingdom, no. 7154\/75, Commission decision of 12 July 1978, DR 14;Bayatyan v. Armenia [GC], no. 23459\/03, \u00a7 110, ECHR 2011;Bayt\u00fcre and Others v. Turkey (dec.), no. 3270\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 28-30, 12 March 2013;Boffa and Others v. San Marino, no. 26536\/95, Commission decision of 15 January 1998, Decisions and Reports (DR) no. 92-B, p. 34;Budayeva and Others v. Russia, nos. 15339\/02 and 4 others, \u00a7\u00a7 128-130, ECHR 2008 (extracts);Dubsk\u00e1 and Krejzov\u00e1 v. the Czech Republic [GC], nos. 28859\/11 and 28473\/12, 15 November 2016;Evans v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 6339\/05, \u00a7 77, ECHR 2007 I;Furd\u00edk v. Slovakia (dec.), no. 42994\/05, 2 December 2008;Hristozov and Others v. Bulgaria, nos. 47039\/11 and 358\/12, ECHR 2012 (extracts);\u0130brahim Keskin v. Turkey, no. 10491\/12, \u00a7 62, 27 March 2018;Kotilainen and Others v. Finland, no. 62439\/12, \u00a7\u00a7 78 et seq., 17 September 2020;L.C.B. v. the United Kingdom, 9 June 1998, \u00a7 36, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 III;Molla Sali v. Greece [GC], no. 20452\/14, \u00a7 85, 19 December 2018;Neulinger and Shuruk v. Switzerland [GC], no. 41615\/07, \u00a7 135, ECHR 2010;Paradiso and Campanelli v. Italy [GC], no. 25358\/12, 24 January 2017;Pretty v. the United Kingdom, no. 2346\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 82-3, ECHR 2002 III;Radomilja and Others v. Croatia [GC], nos. 37685\/10 and 22768\/12, \u00a7\u00a7 123-126, 20 March 2018;Sanoma Uitgevers B.V. v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 38224\/03, \u00a7 83, 14 September 2010;Solomakhin v. Ukraine, no. 24429\/03, 15 March 2012", "external_sources": "Resolution 1845(2011) of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe on \u201cFundamental rights and responsibilities\u201d;International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights;Convention on the Rights of the Child;European Social Charter;General Comment No. 15 of the United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child on \u201cthe right of the child to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of health\u201d of 17 April 2013 (CRC\/C\/GC\/15)", "conclusion": "Preliminary objection joined to merits (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Ale\u0161 Pejchal;Armen Harutyunyan;Jon Fridrik Kj\u00f8lbro;Krzysztof Wojtyczek;Marko Bo\u0161njak;Paul Lemmens;Robert Spano;S\u00edofra O'Leary;Yonko Grozev;Ksenija Turkovi\u0107;Pere Pastor Vilanova;Tim Eicke", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0408JUD004762113" }, "32": { "webcast_id": "4762113_01072020", "hearing_date": "2020-07-01 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Vav\u0159i\u010dka v. the Czech Republic (no. 47621\/13) and 5 other applications (nos. 3867\/14, 73094\/14, 19306\/15, 19298\/15 and 43883\/15)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "43883\/15", "case_id": "001-209039", "case_name": "CASE OF VAV\u0158I\u010cKA AND OTHERS v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-209039", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2021-04-08 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Sections 46(1),(4),(6), 50 and 80(1) of the Public Health Protection Act (Law no. 258\/2000 Coll., as amended) ; Section 29(1)(f) and (2) of the Minor Offences Act (Law no. 200\/1990 Coll., as amended) ; Section 34(5) of the Education Act (Law no. 561\/2004 Coll., as amended) ; Article 4 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights and Freedoms (Constitutional Law no. 2\/1993 Coll.) ; Civil Code (Law no. 40\/1964 Coll., as amended)", "represented_by": "CANDIGLIOTA Z.", "respondent": "CZE", "articles": "8;8-1;8-2;35;35-1;35-3-a", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Advisory opinion concerning the recognition in domestic law of a legal parent-child relationship between a child born through a gestational surrogacy arrangement abroad and the intended mother [GC], request no. P16 2018 001, French Court of Cassation, \u00a7 38, 10 April 2019;Association of Parents v. the United Kingdom, no. 7154\/75, Commission decision of 12 July 1978, DR 14;Bayatyan v. Armenia [GC], no. 23459\/03, \u00a7 110, ECHR 2011;Bayt\u00fcre and Others v. Turkey (dec.), no. 3270\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 28-30, 12 March 2013;Boffa and Others v. San Marino, no. 26536\/95, Commission decision of 15 January 1998, Decisions and Reports (DR) no. 92-B, p. 34;Budayeva and Others v. Russia, nos. 15339\/02 and 4 others, \u00a7\u00a7 128-130, ECHR 2008 (extracts);Dubsk\u00e1 and Krejzov\u00e1 v. the Czech Republic [GC], nos. 28859\/11 and 28473\/12, 15 November 2016;Evans v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 6339\/05, \u00a7 77, ECHR 2007 I;Furd\u00edk v. Slovakia (dec.), no. 42994\/05, 2 December 2008;Hristozov and Others v. Bulgaria, nos. 47039\/11 and 358\/12, ECHR 2012 (extracts);\u0130brahim Keskin v. Turkey, no. 10491\/12, \u00a7 62, 27 March 2018;Kotilainen and Others v. Finland, no. 62439\/12, \u00a7\u00a7 78 et seq., 17 September 2020;L.C.B. v. the United Kingdom, 9 June 1998, \u00a7 36, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 III;Molla Sali v. Greece [GC], no. 20452\/14, \u00a7 85, 19 December 2018;Neulinger and Shuruk v. Switzerland [GC], no. 41615\/07, \u00a7 135, ECHR 2010;Paradiso and Campanelli v. Italy [GC], no. 25358\/12, 24 January 2017;Pretty v. the United Kingdom, no. 2346\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 82-3, ECHR 2002 III;Radomilja and Others v. Croatia [GC], nos. 37685\/10 and 22768\/12, \u00a7\u00a7 123-126, 20 March 2018;Sanoma Uitgevers B.V. v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 38224\/03, \u00a7 83, 14 September 2010;Solomakhin v. Ukraine, no. 24429\/03, 15 March 2012", "external_sources": "Resolution 1845(2011) of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe on \u201cFundamental rights and responsibilities\u201d;International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights;Convention on the Rights of the Child;European Social Charter;General Comment No. 15 of the United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child on \u201cthe right of the child to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of health\u201d of 17 April 2013 (CRC\/C\/GC\/15)", "conclusion": "Preliminary objection joined to merits (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Ale\u0161 Pejchal;Armen Harutyunyan;Jon Fridrik Kj\u00f8lbro;Krzysztof Wojtyczek;Marko Bo\u0161njak;Paul Lemmens;Robert Spano;S\u00edofra O'Leary;Yonko Grozev;Ksenija Turkovi\u0107;Pere Pastor Vilanova;Tim Eicke", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0408JUD004762113" }, "33": { "webcast_id": "5746715_24062020", "hearing_date": "2020-06-24 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Savran v. Denmark (no. 57467\/15)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "57467\/15", "case_id": "001-214330", "case_name": "CASE OF SAVRAN v. DENMARK", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-214330", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2021-12-07 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Section 50a of the Aliens Act ; Articles 16 \u00a7 2 and 68 of the Danish Penal Code", "represented_by": "TRIER T. ; BOELSKIFTE A.", "respondent": "DNK", "articles": "3;8;8-1;8-2;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "A.W. Khan v. the United Kingdom, no. 47486\/06, \u00a7 32, 12 January 2010;Aswat v. the United Kingdom, no. 17299\/12, \u00a7 49, 16 April 2013;Azerkane v. the Netherlands, no. 3138\/16, \u00a7 70, 2 June 2020;Belli and Arquier-Martinez v. Switzerland, no. 65550\/13, \u00a7 65, 11 December 2018;Bensaid v. the United Kingdom, no. 44599\/98, \u00a7\u00a7 16 and 37, ECHR 2001 I;Bouchelkia v. France, 29 January 1997, \u00a7 41, Reports 1997 I;Bouyid v. Belgium [GC], no. 23380\/09, \u00a7 86, ECHR 2015;D. v. the United Kingdom, 2 May 1997, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997 III;T.C.E. v. Germany, no. 58681\/12, \u00a7 54, 1 March 2018;El Ghatet v. Switzerland, no. 56971\/10, \u00a7 47, 8 November 2016;Emonet and Others v. Switzerland, no. 39051\/03, \u00a7 35, 13 December 2007;Ezzouhdi v. France, no. 47160\/99, \u00a7 26, 13 February 2001;Hamesevic v. Denmark (dec.), no. 25748\/15, \u00a7\u00a7 31 and 46, 16 May 2017;Hristozov and Others v. Bulgaria, nos. 47039\/11 and 358\/12, \u00a7 111, ECHR 2012 (extracts);I.M. v. Switzerland, no. 23887\/16, \u00a7\u00a7 62 and 70, 9 April 2019;K.A. v. Switzerland, no. 62130\/15, \u00a7 41, 7 July 2020;Keles v. Germany, no. 32231\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 65-66, 27 October 2005;Khan v. Denmark, no. 26957\/19, \u00a7 79, 12 January 2021;K\u00fclekci v. Austria, no. 30441\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 39 and 51, 1 June 2017;Kuri\u0107 and Others v. Slovenia [GC], no. 26828\/06, ECHR 2012 (extracts);Levakovic v. Denmark, no. 7841\/14, 23 October 2018;Maslov v. Austria [GC], no. 1638\/03, ECHR 2008;Mehemi v. France, 26 September 1997, \u00a7 41, Reports 1997 VI;N. v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 26565\/05, \u00a7 29, ECHR 2008;Narjis v. Italy, no. 57433\/15, 14 February 2019;Nasri v. France, 13 July 1995, \u00a7 44, Series A no. 320 B;Ndidi v. the United Kingdom, no. 41215\/14, \u00a7 76, 14 September 2017;\u00d6nery\u0131ld\u0131z v. Turkey [GC], no. 48939\/99, \u00a7\u00a7 141 and 149, ECHR 2004 XII;Osman v. Denmark, no. 38058\/09, \u00a7 88, 14 June 2011;Paposhvili v. Belgium [GC], no. 41738\/10, 13 December 2016;Pormes v. the Netherlands, no. 25402\/14, \u00a7 48, 28 July 2020;Pretty v. the United Kingdom, no. 2346\/02, \u00a7 50, ECHR 2002 III;Radovanovic v. Austria (just satisfaction), no. 42703\/98, \u00a7 11, 16 December 2004;Radovanovic v. Austria, no. 42703\/98, \u00a7 37, 22 April 2004;Ramos Nunes de Carvalho e S\u00e1 v. Portugal [GC], nos. 55391\/13 and 2 others, \u00a7\u00a7 87-88, 6 November 2018;S.M. v. Croatia [GC], no. 60561\/14, \u00a7 216, 25 June 2020;Saber and Boughassal v. Spain, nos. 76550\/13 and 45938\/14, 18 December 2018;Shala v. Switzerland, no. 52873\/09, \u00a7 46, 15 November 2012;Tatar v. Switzerland, no. 65692\/12, \u00a7 16, 14 April 2015;\u00dcner v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 46410\/99, ECHR 2006 XII;Veljkovic-Jukic v. Switzerland, no. 59534\/14, \u00a7 57, 21 July 2020;Yesthla v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 37115\/11, \u00a7 32, 15 January 2019;Yildiz v. Austria, no. 37295\/97, \u00a7 51, 31 October 2002;Yilmaz v. Germany, no. 52853\/99, \u00a7\u00a7 47-49, 17 April 2003", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Expulsion) (Turkey);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Expulsion;Article 8-1 - Respect for private life) (Turkey);Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Alena Pol\u00e1\u010dkov\u00e1;Armen Harutyunyan;Branko Lubarda;Carlo Ranzoni;Dmitry Dedov;Egidijus K\u016bris;Georgios A. Serghides;Jon Fridrik Kj\u00f8lbro;Paul Lemmens;Robert Spano;S\u00edofra O'Leary;St\u00e9phanie Mourou-Vikstr\u00f6m;Yonko Grozev;Gabriele Kucsko-Stadlmayer;Ksenija Turkovi\u0107;Pere Pastor Vilanova;Lorraine Schembri Orland;Tim Eicke", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1207JUD005746715" }, "34": { "webcast_id": "5746715_24062020", "hearing_date": "2020-06-24 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Savran v. Denmark (no. 57467\/15)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "57467\/15", "case_id": "001-196152", "case_name": "CASE OF SAVRAN v. DENMARK", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-196152", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2019-10-01 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 3, "court": "7", "issue": "", "represented_by": "TRIER T. ; BOELSKIFTE A.", "respondent": "DNK", "articles": "3;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Aswat v. the United Kingdom, no. 17299\/12, \u00a7 57, 16 April 2013;Bensaid v. the United Kingdom, no. 44599\/98, ECHR 2001 I;D. v. the United Kingdom, 2 May 1997, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997 III;F.G. v. Sweden [GC], no. 43611\/11, \u00a7 115, 23 March 2016;Hamsevic v Denmark (dec.), 25748\/15, \u00a7 28, 16 May 2017;J.K. and Others v. Sweden [GC], no. 59166\/12, \u00a7 127, ECRH 2016;Lopata v. Russia, no. 72250\/01, \u00a7 168, 13 July 2010;Maslov v. Austria [GC], no. 1638\/03, \u00a7\u00a7 72-73, ECHR 2008;N. v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 26565\/05, \u00a7 43, ECHR 2008;Osman v. Denmark, no. 38058\/09, \u00a7 88, 14 June 2011;Paposhvili v. Belgium, [GC], no. 41738\/10, 13 December 2016;Tarakhel v. Switzerland [GC], no. 29217\/12, \u00a7 120, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Tatar v. Switzerland, no. 65692\/12, 14 April 2015", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Expulsion) (Conditional) (Turkey);Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Carlo Ranzoni;Jon Fridrik Kj\u00f8lbro;Paul Lemmens;St\u00e9phanie Mourou-Vikstr\u00f6m", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1001JUD005746715" }, "35": { "webcast_id": "5746715_24062020", "hearing_date": "2020-06-24 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Savran v. Denmark (no. 57467\/15)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "57467\/15", "case_id": "001-175517", "case_name": "SAVRAN v. DENMARK", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-175517", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "", "respondent": "DNK", "articles": "8;8-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Communicated", "separate_opinion": "", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "36": { "webcast_id": "6290315_17062020", "hearing_date": "2020-06-17 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Kurt v. Austria (no. 62903\/15)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "62903\/15", "case_id": "001-210463", "case_name": "CASE OF KURT v. AUSTRIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-210463", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2021-06-15 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Section 38a of the Security Police Act ; Sections 382b and 382e of the Enforcement Act", "represented_by": "KOLBITSCH K. ; AZIZ S.", "respondent": "AUT", "articles": "2;2-1;5;5-1;35;35-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "B. v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 61382\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 52-53, 16 July 2013;B\u0103l\u015fan v. Romania, no. 49645\/09, \u00a7 62, 23 May 2017;Barsova v. Russia, no. 20289\/10, \u00a7 35, 22 October 2019;Bennich Zalewski v. Poland, no. 59857\/00, \u00a7 98, 22 April 2008;Branko Toma\u0161i\u0107 and Others v. Croatia, no. 46598\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 52 and 58, 15 January 2009;Bubbins v. the United Kingdom, no. 50196\/99, \u00a7 147, ECHR 2005-II (extracts);Buzadji v. the Republic of Moldova [GC], no. 23755\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 92 and 102, 5 July 2016;Calvelli and Ciglio v. Italy [GC], no. 32967\/96, \u00a7 48, ECHR 2002\u2011I;Clooth v. Belgium, 12 December 1991, \u00a7 40, Series A no. 225;Denisov v. Ukraine [GC], no. 76639\/11, \u00a7\u00a7 135-36, 25 September 201;Eremia v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 3564\/11, \u00a7\u00a7 59-60, 28 May 2013;Fernandes de Oliveira v. Portugal [GC], no. 78103\/14, \u00a7 81, 31 January 2019;Fernandes de Oliveira v. Portugal, no. 78103\/14, \u00a7 49, 28 March 2017;Halime K\u0131l\u0131\u00e7 v. Turkey, no. 63034\/11, 28 June 2016;J\u0117\u010dius v. Lithuania, no. 34578\/97, \u00a7 50, ECHR 2000 IX;Kontrov\u00e1 v. Slovakia, no. 7510\/04, 31 May 2007;M.G. v. Turkey, no. 646\/10, \u00a7 93, 22 March 2016;McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, 27 September 1995, \u00a7 147, Series A no. 324;Mudric v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 74839\/10, \u00a7 51, 16 July 2013;Munteanu v. Moldova, no. 34168\/11, \u00a7 70, 26 May 2020;Opuz v. Turkey, no. 33401\/02, ECHR 2009;Osman v. the United Kingdom, \u00a7\u00a7 115-16, 28 October 1998, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 VIII;Ostendorf v. Germany, no. 15598\/08, 7 March 2013;S., V. and A. v. Denmark [GC], nos. 35553\/12 and 2 others, 22 October 2018;\u015eahin Alpay v. Turkey, no. 16538\/17, \u00a7 103, 20 March 2018;Schwabe and M.G. v. Germany, nos. 8080\/08 and 8577\/08, \u00a7 72, ECHR 2011 (extracts);T.M. and C.M. v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 26608\/11, \u00a7 46, 28 January 2014;Talpis v. Italy, no. 41237\/14, 2 March 2017;Valiulien\u0117 v. Lithuania, no. 33234\/07, \u00a7 69, 26 March 2013;Volodina v. Russia, no. 41261\/17, 9 July 2019", "external_sources": "Article 51 of the Council of Europe Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence", "conclusion": "Preliminary objection joined to merits (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Six-month period;No violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2 - Positive obligations;Article 2-1 - Life) (Substantive aspect)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Alena Pol\u00e1\u010dkov\u00e1;Andr\u00e9 Potocki;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Armen Harutyunyan;Branko Lubarda;Jon Fridrik Kj\u00f8lbro;M\u0101rti\u0146\u0161 Mits;Paul Lemmens;Pauliine Koskelo;Robert Spano;Yonko Grozev;Gabriele Kucsko-Stadlmayer;Georges Ravarani;Ksenija Turkovi\u0107;Mar\u00eda El\u00f3segui", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0615JUD006290315" }, "37": { "webcast_id": "6290315_17062020", "hearing_date": "2020-06-17 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Kurt v. Austria (no. 62903\/15)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "62903\/15", "case_id": "001-194187", "case_name": "CASE OF KURT v. AUSTRIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-194187", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2019-07-04 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 3, "court": "23", "issue": "Sections 382b (protection from violence in the home) and 382e (procedure and issuance) of the Enforcement Act", "represented_by": "KOLBITSCH C.", "respondent": "AUT", "articles": "2;2-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Budayeva and Others v. Russia, nos. 15339\/02 and 4 others, \u00a7 129, ECHR 2008 (extracts);Calvelli and Ciglio v. Italy [GC], no. 32967\/96, \u00a7 48, ECHR 2002 I;Fernandes de Oliveira v. Portugal [GC], no. 78103\/14, 31 January 2019;Giuliani and Gaggio v. Italy [GC], no. 24458\/02, \u00a7 174;Kolyadenko and Others v. Russia, nos. 17423\/05 and 5 others, \u00a7 157, 28 February 2012;Kontrov\u00e1 v. Slovakia, no. 7510\/04, 31 May 2007;\u00d6nery\u0131ld\u0131z v. Turkey, [GC] no. 48939\/99, \u00a7 89, ECHR 2004-XII;Opuz v. Turkey, no. 33401\/02, ECHR 2;Osman v. the United Kingdom, 28 October 1998, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-VIII;Soering v. the United Kingdom, 7 July 1989, \u00a7 88, Series A no. 161;Talpis v. Italy, no. 41237\/14, 2 March 2017", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "No violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2 - Positive obligations;Article 2-1 - Life) (Substantive aspect)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Andr\u00e9 Potocki;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;M\u0101rti\u0146\u0161 Mits;Yonko Grozev;Gabriele Kucsko-Stadlmayer", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0704JUD006290315" }, "38": { "webcast_id": "6290315_17062020", "hearing_date": "2020-06-17 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Kurt v. Austria (no. 62903\/15)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "62903\/15", "case_id": "001-184709", "case_name": "KURT v. AUSTRIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-184709", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "KOLBITSCH C.", "respondent": "AUT", "articles": "2;2-1;3;8;8-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Communicated", "separate_opinion": "", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "39": { "webcast_id": "669718_10062020", "hearing_date": "2020-06-10 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "M.A. v. Denmark (no. 6697\/18)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "6697\/18", "case_id": "001-211178", "case_name": "CASE OF M.A. v. DENMARK", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-211178", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2021-07-09 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Sections 7(1)-(3), 9(1)(i)(d) and 9c(1) of the Aliens Act (as amended by Act No. 153 of 18 February 2015, Act No. 102 of 3 February 2016 and Act No. 562 of 29 May 2018) ; Section 63 of the Danish Constitution", "represented_by": "DAHLAGER C.", "respondent": "DNK", "articles": "8;8-1;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "A, B and C v. Ireland [GC], no. 25579\/05, ECHR 2010;Abdulaziz, Cabales and Balkandali v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 28 May 1985, \u00a7\u00a7 59-68, Series A no. 94, p. 94;Ahmut v. the Netherlands, no. 21702\/93, 28 November 1996;Animal Defenders International v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 48876\/08, \u00a7 108, ECHR 2013;Antwi and Others v. Norway, no. 26940\/10, 14 February 2012;Baghli v. France, no. 34374\/97, ECHR 1999 VIII;Berisha v. Switzerland, no. 948\/12, 30 July 2013;Berrehab v. the Netherlands, no. 10730\/84, 21 June 1988;Biao v. Denmark [GC], no. 38590\/10, 24 May 2016;Bouchelkia v. France, judgment of 29 January 1997, Reports 1997-I;Butt v. Norway, no. 47017\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 76 and 87, 4 December 2012;Chandra and Others v. the Netherlands no. 53102\/99, 13 May 2003;Correia de Matos v. Portugal [GC], no. 56402\/12, \u00a7 129, 4 April 2018;Cudak v. Lithuania [GC], no. 15869\/02, \u00a7 82, ECHR 2010;Darren Omoregie and Others v. Norway, no. 265\/07, 31 July 2008;Dudgeon v. the United Kingdom (Article 50), 24 February 1983, \u00a7 22, Series A no. 59;Ghatet v. Switzerland, no. 56971\/10, \u00a7 49, 8 November 2016;G\u00fcl v. Switzerland, no. 23218\/94, 19 February 1996;Hasanbasic v. Switzerland, no. 52166\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 57-67, 11 June 2013;Haydarie v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 8876\/04, 20 October 2005;Hirsi Jamaa and Others v. Italy [GC], no. 27765\/09, \u00a7 122, ECHR 2012;Hode and Abdi v. the United Kingdom, no. 22341\/09, \u00a7 66, 6 November 2012;I.A.A. v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 25960\/13, 8 March 2016;I.M. v. Switzerland, no. 23887\/16, \u00a7 72, 9 April 2019;Ilias and Ahmed v. Hungary [GC], no. 47287\/15, \u00a7\u00a7 155 and 213, 21 November 2019;Jeunesse v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 12738\/10, \u00a7 107, 3 October 2014;Khlaifia and Others v. Italy, no. 16483\/12, 15 December 2016;Konstatinov v. the Netherlands, no. 16351\/03, \u00a7 50, 26 April 2007;Leki\u0107 v. Slovenia [GC], no. 36480\/07, \u00a7 108, 11 December 2018;Levakovic v. Denmark, no. 7841\/14, \u00a7 45, 23 October 2018;Mehemi v. France (no. 2), no. 53470\/99, \u00a7 45, ECHR 2003 IV;Muhammad and Muhammad v. Romania [GC], no. 80982\/12, \u00a7 122, 15 October 2020;Nacic and Others v. Sweden, no. 16567\/10, 15 May 2012;Ndidi v. the United Kingdom, no. 41215\/14, \u00a7 76, 14 September 2017;Nunez v. Norway, no. 55597\/09, 28 June 2011;Paposhvili v. Belgium [GC], no. 41738\/10, \u00a7 221, 13 December 2016;Priya v. Denmark (dec.) no. 13594\/03, 6 July 2016;Rodrigues da Silva and Hoogkamer v. the Netherlands, no. 50435\/99, ECHR 2006 I;Salem v. Denmark, no. 77036\/11, \u00a7 81, 1 December 2016;Sen v. the Netherlands, no. 31465\/96, \u00a7 40, 21 December 2001;Senigo Longue and Others v. France, no. 19113\/09, 10 July 2014;Stec and Others v. the United Kingdom (dec.) [GC], nos. 65731\/01 and 65900\/01, \u00a7 48, ECHR 2005 X;Strand Lobben and Others v. Norway [GC], no. 37283\/13, 10 September 2019;Tanda Muzinga v. France, no. 2260\/10, 10 July 2014;Tuquabo-Tekle and Others v. the Netherlands, no. 60665\/00, 1 December 2005", "external_sources": "Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights, Realising the right to family reunification of refugees in Europe (June 2017);Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe Resolution 2243 (2018) on Family reunification of refugees and migrants in the Council of Europe member States;Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union;Council Directive 2003\/86\/EC of 22 September 2003 on the right to family reunification;Council Directive 2001\/55\/EC of 20 July 2001 on minimum standards for giving temporary protection in the event of a mass influx of displaced persons and on measures promoting a balance of efforts between Member States in receiving such persons and bearing the consequences thereof (\u201cthe Temporary Protection Directive\u201d);Directive 2011\/95\/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2011 on standards for the qualification of third-country nationals or stateless persons as beneficiaries of international protection, for a uniform status for refugees or for persons eligible for subsidiary protection, and for the content of the protection granted (\u201cthe recast Qualification Directive);1951 Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees;UN Human Rights Committee sixth period report on Denmark (15 August 2016);UNHCR, Summary Conclusions on the Right to Family Life and Family Unity in the Context of Family Reunification of Refugees and Other Persons In Need Of International Protection (4 December 2017)", "conclusion": "Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Positive obligations;Article 8-1 - Respect for family life);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": null, "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0709JUD000669718" }, "40": { "webcast_id": "669718_10062020", "hearing_date": "2020-06-10 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "M.A. v. Denmark (no. 6697\/18)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "6697\/18", "case_id": "001-186559", "case_name": "M.A. v. DENMARK", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-186559", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "", "respondent": "DNK", "articles": "8;8-1;14", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Communicated", "separate_opinion": "", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "41": { "webcast_id": "487116_26022020", "hearing_date": "2020-02-26 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Hanan v. Germany (no. 4871\/16)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "4871\/16", "case_id": "001-208279", "case_name": "CASE OF HANAN v. GERMANY", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-208279", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2021-02-16 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Code of Crimes against International Law ; Code of Criminal Procedure\n", "represented_by": "KALECK W.", "respondent": "DEU", "articles": "1;2;2-1;35;35-3-a", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Akta\u015f v. Turkey, no. 24351\/94, \u00a7 306, ECHR 2003 V (extracts);Al-Jedda v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 27021\/08, ECHR 2011;Al-Skeini and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 55721\/07, ECHR 2011;Armani Da Silva v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 5878\/08, 30 March 2016;Bankovi\u0107 and Others v. Belgium and Others (dec.) [GC], no. 52207\/99, \u00a7 75, ECHR 2001 XII;Bazorkina v. Russia, no. 69481\/01, \u00a7 121, 27 July 2006;Behrami and Behrami v. France and Saramati v. France, Germany and Norway (dec.) [GC], nos. 71412\/01 and 78166\/01, 2 May 2007;Chagos Islanders v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 35622\/04, 11 December 2012;Damayev v. Russia, no. 36150\/04, 29 May 2012;Georgia v. Russia (II) [GC], no. 38263\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 329-332, 21 January 2021;Giuliani and Gaggio v. Italy [GC], no. 23458\/02, ECHR 2011 (extracts);G\u00fczelyurtlu and Others v. Cyprus and Turkey [GC], no. 36925\/07, 29 January 2019;Hassan v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 29750\/09, ECHR 2014;Hentschel and Stark v. Germany, no. 47274\/15, 9 November 2017;Jaloud v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 47708\/08, ECHR 2014;Kolevi v. Bulgaria, no. 1108\/02, \u00a7 201, 5 November 2009;Markovic and Others v. Italy [GC], no. 1398\/03, ECHR 2006 XIV;McKerr v. the United Kingdom, no. 28883\/95, \u00a7 129, ECHR 2001-III;Medvedyev and Others v. France [GC], no. 3394\/03, \u00a7 64, ECHR 2010;Mustafa Tun\u00e7 and Fecire Tun\u00e7 v. Turkey [GC], no. 24014\/05, 14 April 2015;Nachova and Others v. Bulgaria [GC], nos. 43577\/98 and 43579\/98, \u00a7 160, ECHR 2005\u2011VII;Radomilja and Others v. Croatia [GC], nos. 37685\/10 and 22768\/12, \u00a7 117, ECHR 2018;Ramsahai and Others v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 52391\/99, ECHR 2007 II;Rantsev v. Cyprus and Russia, no. 25965\/04, ECHR 2010 (extracts);Romeo Casta\u00f1o v. Belgium, no. 8351\/17, 9 July 2019;Tanr\u0131kulu v. Turkey [GC], no. 23763\/94, \u00a7\u00a7 101-110, ECHR 1999-IV;Velcea and Maz\u0103re v. Romania, no. 64301\/01, 1 December 2009;Velikova v. Bulgaria, no. 41488\/98, \u00a7 80, ECHR 2000\u2011VI", "external_sources": "Chapter VII of the United Nations Charter;Rule 158 of the Customary International Humanitarian Law;UN Basic Principles and Guidelines, adopted by General Assembly Resolution 60\/147 of 16 December 2005 (A\/RES\/60\/147);Human Rights Committee\u2019s General Comment No. 36 on the right to life under Article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, adopted on 30 October 2018;Revised version of the Minnesota Protocol on the Investigation of Potentially Unlawful Death (\u201cMinnesota Protocol\u201d) published by the Office of the UN High Commissionessr for Human Rights in 2017;Section I, subsection 3, of the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) Status of Forces Agreement;Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (\u201cthe Rome Statute\u201d) entered into force on 1 July 2002\n", "conclusion": "Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;No violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Ale\u0161 Pejchal;Andr\u00e9 Potocki;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Carlo Ranzoni;Helen Keller;Jon Fridrik Kj\u00f8lbro;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;M\u0101rti\u0146\u0161 Mits;Paul Lemmens;Robert Spano;Yonko Grozev;Ksenija Turkovi\u0107;Tim Eicke", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0216JUD000487116" }, "42": { "webcast_id": "487116_26022020", "hearing_date": "2020-02-26 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Hanan v. Germany (no. 4871\/16)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "4871\/16", "case_id": "001-166884", "case_name": "HANAN v. GERMANY", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-166884", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "KALECK W.", "respondent": "DEU", "articles": "2;2-1;13", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Communicated", "separate_opinion": "", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "43": { "webcast_id": "2637418_05022020", "hearing_date": "2020-02-05 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Gu\u00f0mundur Andri \u00c1str\u00e1\u00f0sson v. Iceland (no. 26374\/18)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "26374\/18", "case_id": "001-206582", "case_name": "CASE OF GU\u00d0MUNDUR ANDRI \u00c1STR\u00c1\u00d0SSON v. ICELAND", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-206582", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2020-12-01 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Section 10 of the Administrative Procedures Act no. 37\/1993 ; Judiciary Act nos. 15\/1998, 45\/2010 and 50\/2016 ; Equality Act no. 10\/2008", "represented_by": "VILHJ\u00c1LMSSON V.H.", "respondent": "ISL", "articles": "6;6-1;41;46;46-2", "strasbourg_caselaw": "A, B and C v. Ireland [GC], no. 25579\/05, \u00a7 281, ECHR 2010;Baka v. Hungary [GC], no. 20261\/12, 23 June 2016;Belilos v. Switzerland, 29 April 1988, \u00a7 64, Series A no. 132;Brum\u0103rescu v. Romania [GC], no. 28342\/95, \u00a7 61, ECHR 1999 VII;Burmych and Others v. Ukraine (striking out) [GC], nos. 46852\/13 et al, \u00a7\u00a7 120-122, 12 October 2017;Carbonara and Ventura v. Italy, no. 24638\/94, \u00a7 68, ECHR 2000 VI;Chim and Przywieczerski v. Poland, nos. 36661\/07 and 38433\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 138-142, 12 April 2018;Co\u00ebme and Others v. Belgium, nos. 32492\/96 and 4 others, ECHR 2000 VII;Denisov v. Ukraine [GC], no. 76639\/11, \u00a7 63, 25 September 2018;DMD GROUP, a.s., v. Slovakia, no. 19334\/03, 5 October 2010;Ezgeta v. Croatia, no. 40562\/12, 7 September 2017;Fruni v. Slovakia, no. 8014\/07, \u00a7 145, 21 June 2011;Garib v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 43494\/09, \u00a7 137, 6 November 2017;Gorguiladz\u00e9 v. Georgia, no. 4313\/04, 20 October 2009;Gurov v. Moldova, no. 36455\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 36-37, 11 July 2006;Henryk Urban and Ryszard Urban v. Poland, no. 23614\/08, 30 November 2010;Ilatovskiy v. Russia, no. 6945\/04, \u00a7\u00a7 38-42, 9 July 2009;Ilgar Mammadov v. Azerbaijan (infringement proceedings) [GC], no. 15172\/13, 29 May 2019;Jeni\u021ba Mocanu v. Romania, no. 11770\/08, 17 December 2013;Jorgic v. Germany, no. 74613\/01, \u00a7 64, ECHR 2007-III (extracts);Kar\u00e1csony and Others v. Hungary [GC], nos. 42461\/13 and 44357\/13, \u00a7 190, 17 May 2016;Khrykin v. Russia, no. 33186\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 28-30, 19 April 2011;Kleyn and Others v. the Netherlands [GC], nos. 39343\/98 and 3 others, \u00a7 193, ECHR 2003 VI;Kontalexis v. Greece, no. 59000\/08, 31 May 2011;Lavents v. Latvia, no. 58442\/00, \u00a7\u00a7 114-115, 28 November 2002;Maktouf and Damjanovi\u0107 v. Bosnia and Herzegovina [GC], nos. 2312\/08 and 34179\/08, \u00a7 49, ECHR 2013;Medvedyev and Others v. France [GC], no. 3394\/03, \u00a7 80, ECHR 2010;Miracle Europe Kft v. Hungary, no. 57774\/13, 12 January 2016;Mom\u010dilovi\u0107 v. Serbia, no. 23103\/07, 2 April 2013;Moreira Ferreira v. Portugal (no. 2) [GC], no. 19867\/12, \u00a7 62, 11 July 2017;Morice v. France [GC], no. 29369\/10, \u00a7 128 ECHR 2015;Nejdet \u015eahin and Perihan \u015eahin v. Turkey [GC], no. 13279\/05, \u00a7 56, 20 October 2011;\u00d6calan v. Turkey [GC], no. 46221\/99, \u00a7 210, ECHR 2005 IV;Oleksandr Volkov v. Ukraine, no. 21722\/11, \u00a7\u00a7 152-156, ECHR 2013;OOO Link Oil SPB v. Russia (dec.), no. 42600\/05, 25 June 2009;Pandjikidz\u00e9 and Others v. Georgia, no. 30323\/02, 27 October 2009;Pasquini v. San Marino, no. 50956\/16, \u00a7\u00a7 103 and 107, 2 May 2019;Posokhov v. Russia, no. 63486\/00, \u00a7\u00a7 39-44, ECHR 2003 IV;Radomilja and Others v. Croatia [GC], nos. 37685\/10 and 22768\/12, \u00a7 149, 20 March 2018;Ramos Nunes de Carvalho e S\u00e1 v. Portugal [GC], nos. 55391\/13 and 2 others, 6 November 2018;Richert v. Poland, no. 54809\/07, 25 October 2011;Ryabykh v. Russia, no. 52854\/99, \u00a7 52, ECHR 2003 IX;S., V. and A. v. Denmark [GC], nos. 35553\/12 and 2 others, \u00a7 148, 22 October 2018;Satakunnan Markkinap\u00f6rssi Oy and Satamedia Oy v. Finland [GC], no. 931\/13, \u00a7 164, 27 June 2017;Scordino v. Italy (no. 1) [GC], no. 36813\/97, \u00a7 191, ECHR 2006 V;Scozzari and Giunta v. Italy [GC], nos. 39221\/98 and 41963\/98, \u00a7 249, ECHR 2000 VIII;Sokurenko and Strygun v. Ukraine, nos. 29458\/04 and 29465\/04, 20 July 2006;Stanev v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 36760\/06, \u00a7 254, ECHR 2012;Sutyazhnik v. Russia, no. 8269\/02, 23 July 2009;Von Hannover v. Germany (no. 2) [GC], nos. 40660\/08 and 60641\/08, \u00a7 107, ECHR 2012;Zand v. Austria, no. 7360\/76, Commission\u2019s report of 12 October 1978, Decisions and Reports (DR) 15, pp. 70-80;Zeynalov v. Azerbaijan, no. 31848\/07, 30 May 2013", "external_sources": "Consultative Council of European Judges (CCJE), Opinion no. 1 on standards concerning the independence of the judiciary and the irremovability of judges (2001);Principle 8 of the Magna Carta of Judges (Fundamental Principles) (2010, CCJE);Council of Europe Group of States Against Corruption (Greco) Fourth Evaluation Report on Iceland (2013);European Charter on the Statute for Judges of 8-10 July 1998;General Assembly of the European Network of Councils for the Judiciary, Dublin Declaration on Standards for the Recruitment and Appointment of Members of the Judiciary (May 2012);Latimer House Guidelines for the Commonwealth on Parliamentary Supremacy and Judicial Independence (1998);Recommendation 2010(12) of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on judges: independence, efficiency and responsibilities;Principle 10 of the UN Basic Principles on the Independence of the Judiciary (1985);UN Human Rights Committee, General Comment no. 32 on Article 14 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (2007);Fifth Periodic Report of the Government of Iceland to the UN Human Rights Committee on the implementation of the ICCPR (2010);Article 9 of the Universal Charter of the Judge (1999);Venice Commission, Rule of Law Checklist (2016);Venice Commission, Report on Judicial Appointments (2007)\n", "conclusion": "Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Tribunal established by law);Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Respondent State to take measures of a general character (Article 46-2 - General measures)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Ale\u0161 Pejchal;Branko Lubarda;Egidijus K\u016bris;Georgios A. Serghides;Jon Fridrik Kj\u00f8lbro;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;M\u0101rti\u0146\u0161 Mits;Paul Lemmens;Paulo Pinto De Albuquerque;Robert Spano;S\u00edofra O'Leary;Gabriele Kucsko-Stadlmayer;Georges Ravarani;Pere Pastor Vilanova;Mar\u00eda El\u00f3segui", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1201JUD002637418" }, "44": { "webcast_id": "2637418_05022020", "hearing_date": "2020-02-05 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Gu\u00f0mundur Andri \u00c1str\u00e1\u00f0sson v. Iceland (no. 26374\/18)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "26374\/18", "case_id": "001-191701", "case_name": "CASE OF GU\u00d0MUNDUR ANDRI \u00c1STR\u00c1\u00d0SSON v. ICELAND", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-191701", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2019-03-12 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 3, "court": "5", "issue": "Administrative Procedures Act No. 37\/1993 ; Temporary provision IV of the Judiciary Act No. 50\/2016\n", "represented_by": "VILHJALMSSON V.H.", "respondent": "ISL", "articles": "6;6-1;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Beuze v. Belgium [GC], no. 71409\/10, 9 November 2018, \u00a7 119;Co\u00ebme and Others v. Belgium, nos. 32492\/96 and 4 others, \u00a7 98, ECHR 2000 VII;DMD GROUP, a.s., v. Slovakia, no. 19334\/03, \u00a7 61, 5 October 2010;Gorguiladz\u00e9 v. Georgia, no. 4313\/04, \u00a7 68, 20 October 2009;Ibrahim and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 50541\/08, 50571\/08, 50573\/08 and 40351\/09, \u00a7 315, 13 September 2016;Jorgic v. Germany, no. 74613\/01, \u00a7 64, ECHR 2007-III (extracts);Lavents v. Latvia, no. 58442\/00, \u00a7 114, 28 November 2002;Moreira Ferreira v. Portugal (no. 2) [GC], no. 19867\/12, \u00a7 99, 11 July 2017;Morice v. France [GC], no. 29369\/10, \u00a7 78, 23 April 2015;Pandjikidz\u00e9 and Others v. Georgia, no. 30323\/02, \u00a7 104, 27 October 2009;Ramos Nunes de Carvalho E S\u00c1 v Portugal [GC], nos. 55391\/13, 57728\/13 and 74041\/13, \u00a7\u00a7 144 and 222, 6 November 2018;Savino and Others v. Italy, nos. 17214\/05, 20329\/05 and 42113\/04, \u00a7 94, 28 April 2009;Zand v. Austria, no. 7360\/76, Commission report of 12 October 1978, Decisions and Reports (DR) 15, pp. 70 and 80", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Tribunal established by law);Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Paul Lemmens;Robert Spano", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0312JUD002637418" }, "45": { "webcast_id": "2637418_05022020", "hearing_date": "2020-02-05 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Gu\u00f0mundur Andri \u00c1str\u00e1\u00f0sson v. Iceland (no. 26374\/18)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "26374\/18", "case_id": "001-184645", "case_name": "GUDMUNDUR ANDR \u00c1STR\u00c1\u00d0SSON v. ICELAND", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-184645", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "", "respondent": "ISL", "articles": "6;6-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Communicated", "separate_opinion": "", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "46": { "webcast_id": "2245716_15012020", "hearing_date": "2020-01-15 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "X and Others v. Bulgaria (no. 22457\/16)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "22457\/16", "case_id": "001-207953", "case_name": "CASE OF X AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-207953", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2021-02-02 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Criminal Code of Bulgaria", "represented_by": "MAUCERI F.", "respondent": "BGR", "articles": "3;8;8-1;35;35-3-a;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "A and B v. Croatia, no. 7144\/15, \u00a7 106, 20 June 2019;A, B and C v. Latvia, no. 30808\/11, \u00a7 149, 31 March 2016;A. v. the United Kingdom, 23 September 1998, \u00a7 22, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 VI;Al Adsani v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 35763\/97, \u00a7 55, ECHR 2001 XI;Armani Da Silva v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 5878\/08, \u00a7 234, 30 March 2016;B.V. v. Belgium, no. 61030\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 56-61 and 66, 2 May 2017;Bat\u0131 and Others v. Turkey, nos. 33097\/96 and 57834\/00, \u00a7 134, ECHR 2004 IV (extracts);Bouyid v. Belgium [GC], no. 23380\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 118-123, ECHR 2015;Buturug\u0103 v. Romania, no. 56867\/15, \u00a7 61, 11 February 2020;\u0110or\u0111evi\u0107 v. Croatia, no. 41526\/10, \u00a7\u00a7 139 and 144-146, ECHR 2012;Giuliani and Gaggio v. Italy [GC], no. 23458\/02, \u00a7 303, ECHR 2011 (extracts);Gross v. Switzerland [GC], no. 67810\/10, \u00a7 28, ECHR 2014;G\u00fczelyurtlu and Others v. Cyprus and Turkey [GC], no. 36925\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 233 and 235, 29 January 2019;Ilnseher v. Germany [GC], nos. 10211\/12 and 27505\/14, \u00a7 100, 4 December 2018;M. and C. v. Romania, no. 29032\/04, \u00a7 113, 27 September 2011;M. and Others v. Italy and Bulgaria, no. 40020\/03, \u00a7 104, 31 July 2012;M.C. v. Bulgaria, no. 39272\/98, \u00a7\u00a7 149-150, ECHR 2003 XII;M.G.C. v. Romania, no. 61495\/11, \u00a7\u00a7 58, 70 and 73, 15 March 2016;M.M.B. v. Slovakia, no. 6318\/17, \u00a7\u00a7 61 and 66, 26 November 2019;M.N. v. Bulgaria, no. 3832\/06, \u00a7 48, 27 November 2012;M.P. and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 22457\/08, \u00a7 111, 15 November 2011;Nencheva and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 48609\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 106 116 and 119-20, 18 June 2013;Nicolae Virgiliu T\u0103nase v. Romania [GC], no. 41720\/13, \u00a7 116, 25 June 2019;O\u2019Keeffe v. Ireland [GC], no. 35810\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 144-148 and 157-169, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Osman v. the United Kingdom, 28 October 1998, \u00a7\u00a7 115-116, Reports 1998-VIII;Paradiso and Campanelli v. Italy [GC], no. 25358\/12, \u00a7 84, 24 January 2017;Radomilja and Others v. Croatia [GC], nos. 37685\/10 and 22768\/12, \u00a7 126, 20 March 2018;S.M. v. Croatia [GC], no. 60561\/14, \u00a7\u00a7 241-243 and 314, 25 June 2020;S.Z. v. Bulgaria, no. 29263\/12, 3 March 2015;S\u00f6derman v. Sweden [GC], no. 5786\/08, \u00a7 82, ECHR 2013;Streletz, Kessler and Krenz v. Germany [GC], nos. 34044\/96 and 2 others, \u00a7 90, ECHR 2001 II;Talpis v. Italy, no. 41237\/14, \u00a7 111, 2 March 2017;V.C. v. Italy, no. 54227\/14, \u00a7\u00a7 95 and 99-102, 1 February 2018;W. v. Slovenia, no. 24125\/06, \u00a7 64, 23 January 2014;Y v. Bulgaria, no. 41990\/18, \u00a7\u00a7 82 and 93, 20 February 2020;Zafranas v. Greece, no. 4056\/08, \u00a7 26, 4 October 2011", "external_sources": "Article 19 UN Convention on the Rights of the Child;Articles 12-14, 30-38 of the Council of Europe Convention on the Protection of Children against Sexual Exploitation and Sexual Abuse (\u201cLanzarote Convention\u201d) and Explanatoy Report;Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters between the Member States of the Euroepan Union \n", "conclusion": "Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Abuse of the right of application;No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment;Positive obligations) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Andr\u00e9 Potocki;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Branko Lubarda;Carlo Ranzoni;Dmitry Dedov;Georgios A. Serghides;Iulia Motoc;Jon Fridrik Kj\u00f8lbro;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Marko Bo\u0161njak;M\u0101rti\u0146\u0161 Mits;Paul Lemmens;Paulo Pinto De Albuquerque;Robert Spano;S\u00edofra O'Leary;Yonko Grozev;Gabriele Kucsko-Stadlmayer;Ksenija Turkovi\u0107;Mar\u00eda El\u00f3segui;Tim Eicke", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0202JUD002245716" }, "47": { "webcast_id": "2245716_15012020", "hearing_date": "2020-01-15 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "X and Others v. Bulgaria (no. 22457\/16)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "22457\/16", "case_id": "001-189351", "case_name": "CASE OF X AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-189351", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2019-01-17 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 3, "court": "23", "issue": "", "represented_by": "MAUCERI F.", "respondent": "BGR", "articles": "3;8;8-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "A. v. the United Kingdom, 23 September 1998, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 VI;B.V. v. Belgium, no 61030\/08, 2 May 2017;Bouyid v. Belgium [GC], no 23380\/09, ECHR 2015;Di Salvo v. Italy (dec.), no 16098\/05, 11 January 2007;\u0110or\u0111evi\u0107 v. Croatia, no 41526\/10, \u00a7 139, ECHR 2012;Gross v. Switzerland [GC], no 67810\/10, \u00a7 28, ECHR 2014;M. and C. v. Romania, no 29032\/04, \u00a7 113, 27 September 2011;M.C. v. Bulgaria, no 39272\/98, \u00a7 149, ECHR 2003 XII;M.P. and Others v. Bulgaria, no 22457\/08, 15 November 2011;\u0158eh\u00e1k v. the Czech Republic (dec.), no 67208\/01, 18 May 2004;S.Z. v. Bulgaria, no 29263\/12, 3 March 2015;Szula v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no 18727\/06, 4 January 2007;V.C. v. Italy, no 54227\/14, 1 February 2018;X and Y v. the Netherlands, 26 March 1985, \u00a7 20, Series A no 91;Z and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 29392\/95, ECHR 2001 V", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation;Positive obligations) (Procedural aspect);No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment;Positive obligations) (Substantive aspect);No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Positive obligations;Article 8-1 - Respect for private life)", "separate_opinion": "FALSE", "judges": "Andr\u00e9 Potocki;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;M\u0101rti\u0146\u0161 Mits;S\u00edofra O'Leary;Yonko Grozev;Gabriele Kucsko-Stadlmayer", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0117JUD002245716" }, "48": { "webcast_id": "529414_18122019", "hearing_date": "2019-12-18 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Albert and Others v. Hungary (no. 5294\/14)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "5294\/14", "case_id": "001-203850", "case_name": "CASE OF ALBERT AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-203850", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2020-07-07 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Act no. CXXXV of 2013 on the Integration of Cooperative Credit Institutions and the Amendment of Certain Laws Regarding Economic Matters ; Act no. CXCVI of 2013 on the Amendment of Certain Laws Regarding the Integration of Cooperative Credit Institutions\n", "represented_by": "GARDOS I.", "respondent": "HUN", "articles": "34;P1-1;P1-1-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Agrotexim and Others v. Greece, 24 October 1995, Series A no. 330 A;Ankarcrona v. Sweden (dec.), no. 35178\/97, ECHR 2000-VI;Antilla v. Finland (dec.), no. 16248\/10, 19 November 2013;Association SOS Attentats and de Bo\u00ebry v. France [GC], (dec.), no. 76642\/01, \u00a7 30, ECHR 2006 XIV;Bayramov v. Azerbaijan (dec.), 23055\/03, 14 February 2006;Berlusconi v. Italy [GC], no. 58428\/13, \u00a7 65, 27 November 2018;Burden v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 13378\/05, \u00a7 33, ECHR 2008;Camberrow MM5 AD v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 50357\/99, 1 April 2004;Capital Bank AD v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 49429\/99, 9 September 2004;Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin C\u00e2mpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 96 and 101, ECHR 2014;Centro Europa 7 S.R.L. and Di Stefano v. Italy [GC], 38433\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 92-95, 7 June 2012;COMPANY S. and T. v. Sweden, no. 11189\/84, Commission decision of 11 December 1986, Decisions and Reports (DR);Credit and Industrial Bank v. the Czech Republic, no. 29010\/95, \u00a7 51, 21 October 2003;Dyrwold v. Sweden, no. 12259\/86, Commission decision of 7 September 1990;Erbs v. France, no. 23313\/94, Commission decision of 18 May 1995;Erduran and Em Export D\u0131\u015f Tic A.\u015e. v. Turkey, nos. 25707\/05 and 28614\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 59 -61, 20 November 2018;Feldman and Slovyanskyy Bank v. Ukraine, no. 42758\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 28-29, 21 December 2017;Fridh and Cifond Aktiebolag v. Sweden, no. 14017\/88, Commission decision of 2 July 1992;Gardean and S.C. Grup 95 SA v. Romania, no. 25787\/04, \u00a7\u00a7 16-18, 1 December 2009;Georgescu and Prodas Holding S.A. v. Romania (dec.), no. 25830\/03, 27 May 2014;Gubarev and Serdyukov v. Russia (dec.), no. 42334\/06, 18 June 2019;Herrmann v. Germany [GC], no. 9300\/07, \u00a7 39, 26 June 2012;Ilias and Ahmed v. Hungary [GC], no. 47287\/15, \u00a7 173, 21 November 2019;Ilnseher v. Germany [GC], nos. 10211\/12 and 27505\/14, \u00a7 100, 4 December 2018;International Bank for Commerce and Development AD and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 7031\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 90-92, 2 June 2016;J.W. v. Poland, no. 27917\/95, Commission decision of 11 September 1997;Jafarli and Others v. Azerbaijan, no. 36079\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 38-42, 29 July 2010;K. and T. v. Finland [GC], no. 25702\/94, \u00a7\u00a7 140-41, ECHR 2001 VII;Kaplan v. the United Kingdom, no. 7598\/76, Commission decision of 14 December 1978;Khamidov v. Russia, no. 72118\/01, \u00a7\u00a7 123-126, 15 November 2007;Kind v. Germany, no. 44324\/98, Commission decision of 30 March 2000;Kin-Stib and Majki\u0107 v. Serbia, no. 12312\/05, \u00a7 74, 20 April 2010;KIPS DOO and Drekalovi\u0107 v. Montenegro, no. 28766\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 86-87, 26 June 2018;Leki\u0107 v. Slovenia [GC], no. 36480\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 111 and 115, 11 December 2018;Melo Tadeu v. Portugal, no. 27785\/10, \u00a7 75, 23 October 2014;Nassau Verzerkering Maatschappij N.V. v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 57602\/09, \u00a7 21, 4 October 2011;Offerhaus and Offerhaus v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 35730\/97, 16 January 2001;Olczak v. Poland (dec.), no. 30417\/96, ECHR 2002 X (extracts);Pokis v. Latvia (dec.), no. 528\/02, ECHR 2006 XV;Reisner v. Turkey, no. 46815\/09, \u00a7 45, 21 July 2015;Rysovskyy v.Ukraine, no. 29979\/04, \u00a7\u00a7 46-49, 20 October 2011;S.C. Bartolo Prod Com SRL and Botomei v. Romania, no. 16294\/03, \u00a7\u00a7 29-31, 21 February 2012;S.C. Fiercolect Impex S.R.L. v. Romania, no. 26429\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 38-41, 13 December 2016;S.p.r.l. ANCA and Others v. Belgium, no. 10259\/83, Commission decision of 10 December 1984;Shesti Mai Engineering OOD and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 17854\/04, \u00a7\u00a7 80-92, 20 September 2011;Sovtransavto Holding v. Ukraine, no. 48553\/99, \u00a7 92, 25 July 2002;Soyuer and Others v. Turkey (dec.), no. 49445\/07, 21 June 2011;Tee v. the United Kingdom, no. 26663\/95, Commission decision of 28 February 1996;Vesela and Loyka v. Slovakia (dec.), no. 54811\/00, 13 December 2005;Vladimirova v. Russia, no. 21863\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 40-41, 10 April 2018;Vujovi\u0107 and Lipa D.O.O. v. Montenegro, no. 18912\/15, \u00a7\u00a7 29-30, 20 February 2018;Yarrow and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 9266\/81, Commission decision of 18 January 1983, D.R. 30, p. 155;Z\u00fclfikari v. Turkey, nos. 6372\/05 and 52543\/07, \u00a7 47, 19 March 2019", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Inadmissible (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Victim", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Andr\u00e9 Potocki;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Branko Lubarda;Carlo Ranzoni;Dmitry Dedov;Ganna Yudkivska;Helen Keller;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Marko Bo\u0161njak;Paulo Pinto De Albuquerque;Robert Spano;S\u00edofra O'Leary;St\u00e9phanie Mourou-Vikstr\u00f6m;Ksenija Turkovi\u0107;Pere Pastor Vilanova", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0707JUD000529414" }, "49": { "webcast_id": "529414_18122019", "hearing_date": "2019-12-18 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Albert and Others v. Hungary (no. 5294\/14)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "5294\/14", "case_id": "001-189631", "case_name": "CASE OF ALBERT AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-189631", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2019-01-29 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 3, "court": "7", "issue": "Sections 15 and 17\/C of the Integration Act", "represented_by": "GARDOS I.", "respondent": "HUN", "articles": "34;P1-1;P1-1-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Agrotexim and Others v. Greece, 24 October 1995, \u00a7\u00a7 65 and 66, Series A no. 330 A;Albert and Others v. Hungary (dec.), no. 5294\/14, 4 April 2017;Ankarcrona v. Sweden (dec.), no. 35178\/97, 27 June 2000;Centro Europa 7 S.r.l. and Di Stefano v. Italy [GC], no. 38433\/09, \u00a7 80, ECHR 2012;Credit and Industrial Bank v. the Czech Republic, no. 29010\/95, \u00a7\u00a7 50 to 52, ECHR 2003 XI (extracts);Din\u00e7er and Others v. Turkey, no. 10435\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 13 and 14, 3 November 2011;Feldman and Slovyanskyy Bank v. Ukraine, no. 42758\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 28 and 29, 21 December 2017;G.J. v. Luxembourg, no. 21156\/93, \u00a7 24, 26 October 2000;Glas Nadezhda EOOD and Anatoliy Elenkov v. Bulgaria, no. 14134\/02, \u00a7 40, ECHR 2007;Jensen and Rasmussen v. Denmark (dec.), no. 52620\/99, 20 March 2003;Olczak v. Poland (dec.), no. 30417\/96, ECHR 2002 X (extracts);Petrovi\u0107 v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, nos. 30721\/15, \u00a7\u00a7 15 and 16, 22 June 2017", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "No violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Carlo Ranzoni;Ganna Yudkivska;Luzius Wildhaber;Marko Bo\u0161njak;Paulo Pinto De Albuquerque;Robert Spano", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0129JUD000529414" }, "50": { "webcast_id": "529414_18122019", "hearing_date": "2019-12-18 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Albert and Others v. Hungary (no. 5294\/14)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "5294\/14", "case_id": "001-146905", "case_name": "ALBERT AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-146905", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "", "respondent": "HUN", "articles": "P1-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "", "separate_opinion": "", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "51": { "webcast_id": "529414_18122019", "hearing_date": "2019-12-18 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Albert and Others v. Hungary (no. 5294\/14)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "5294\/14", "case_id": "001-173396", "case_name": "ALBERT AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-173396", "type": "DECISIONS", "typedescription": 8, "document_date": "", "collection": "CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "7", "issue": "", "represented_by": "GARDOS I.", "respondent": "HUN", "articles": "34;35;P1-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Admissible", "separate_opinion": "", "judges": "Andr\u00e1s Saj\u00f3;Egidijus K\u016bris;Ganna Yudkivska;Marko Bo\u0161njak;Nona Tsotsoria;Vincent A. De Gaetano;Gabriele Kucsko-Stadlmayer", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0404DEC000529414" }, "52": { "webcast_id": "31015_04122019", "hearing_date": "2019-12-04 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Mugemangango v. Belgium (no. 310\/15)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "310\/15", "case_id": "001-203885", "case_name": "CASE OF MUGEMANGANGO v. BELGIUM", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-203885", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2020-07-10 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Section 31 of the Special Law on institutional reform", "represented_by": "P\u00c9TR\u00c9 M. ; STEIN O. ; FLACHET I. ", "respondent": "BEL", "articles": "13;13+P1-3;41;P1-3", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Abdalov and Others v. Azerbaijan, nos. 28508\/11 and 33773\/18, \u00a7 108, 11 July 2019;Amuur v. France, 25 June 1996, \u00a7 50, Reports 1996-III;Babenko v. Ukraine (dec.), no. 43476\/98, 4 May 1999;Berlusconi v. Italy (striking out) (dec.) [GC], no. 58428\/13, 27 November 2018;Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin C\u00e2mpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 148-49, ECHR 2014;Cernea v. Romania, no. 43609\/10, \u00a7 40, 27 February 2018;Chahal v. the United Kingdom, 15 November 1996, \u00a7 152, Reports 1996 V;Cheminade v. France (dec.), no. 31599\/96, ECHR 1999-II;\u010conka v. Belgium, no. 51564\/99, \u00a7 83, ECHR 2002-I;Davydov and Others v. Russia, no. 75947\/11, 30 May 2017;De Tommaso v. Italy [GC], no. 43395\/09, 23 February 2017;Denisov v. Ukraine [GC], no. 76639\/11, \u00a7 63, 25 September 2018;G.K. v. Belgium, no. 58302\/10, 21 May 2019;Gahramanli and Others v. Azerbaijan, no. 36503\/11, 8 October 2015;Georgian Labour Party v. Georgia, no. 9103\/04, \u00a7 108, ECHR 2008;Grosaru v. Romania, no. 78039\/01, ECHR 2010;Hirst v. the United Kingdom (no. 2) [GC], no. 74025\/01, \u00a7 61, ECHR 2005-IX;I.Z. v. Greece, no. 18997\/91, Commission decision of 28 February 1994, Decisions and Reports 76-A, p. 65;\u0130lhan v. Turkey [GC], no. 22277\/93, \u00a7 97, ECHR 2000-VII;Kar\u00e1csony and Others v. Hungary [GC], nos. 42461\/13 and 44357\/13, \u00a7\u00a7 138-47, 17 May 2016;Kart v. Turkey [GC], no. 8917\/05, ECHR 2009 (extracts);Kerimova v. Azerbaijan, no. 20799\/06, 30 September 2010;Khlaifia and Others v. Italy [GC], no. 16483\/12, \u00a7 268, 15 December 2016;Kovach v. Ukraine, no. 39424\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 54-55, ECHR 2008;Kud\u0142a v. Poland [GC], no. 30210\/96, \u00a7 157, ECHR 2000 XI;Magyar K\u00e9tfark\u00fa Kutya P\u00e1rt v. Hungary [GC], no. 201\/17, \u00a7 99, 20 January 2020;Mathieu-Mohin and Clerfayt v. Belgium, 2 March 1987, \u00a7\u00a7 47-54, Series A no. 113;Micallef v. Malta [GC], no. 17056\/06, \u00a7 98, ECHR 2009,;Mur\u0161i\u0107 v. Croatia [GC], no. 7334\/13, \u00a7 111, 20 October 2016;N.D. and N.T. v. Spain [GC], nos. 8675\/15 and 8697\/15, \u00a7 240, 13 February 2020;Namat Aliyev v. Azerbaijan, no. 18705\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 77-81 et seq., 8 April 2010;Paunovi\u0107 and Milivojevi\u0107 v. Serbia, no. 41683\/06, 24 May 2016;Petkov and Others v. Bulgaria, nos. 77568\/01 and 2 others, \u00a7 63, 11 June 2009;Pierre-Bloch v. France, 21 October 1997, \u00a7\u00a7 51 and 53-59, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-VI;Podkolzina v. Latvia, no. 46726\/99, ECHR 2002-II;Ramos Nunes de Carvalho e S\u00e1 v. Portugal [GC], nos. 55391\/13 and 2 others, \u00a7 149, 6 November 2018;Riza and Others v. Bulgaria, nos. 48555\/10 and 48377\/10, 13 October 2015;Sitaropoulos and Giakoumopoulos v. Greece [GC], no. 42202\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 63-66, ECHR 2012;T\u0103nase v. Moldova [GC], no. 7\/08, ECHR 2010;\u017ddanoka v. Latvia [GC], no. 58278\/00, ECHR 2006-IV", "external_sources": "Venice Commission Code of Good Practice in Electoral Matters;OSCE Report on Belgium of 19 October 2007;UN Human Rights Committee General Comment no. 25 (57) of 27 August 1996", "conclusion": "Violation of Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 - Right to free elections-{general} (Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 - Stand for election);Violation of Article 13+P1-3 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 - Right to free elections-{general};Stand for election);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": null, "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0710JUD000031015" }, "53": { "webcast_id": "6827314_09102019", "hearing_date": "2019-10-09 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Gestur J\u00f3nsson and Ragnar Halld\u00f3r Hall v. Iceland (nos. 68273\/14 and 68271\/14)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "68273\/14", "case_id": "001-207115", "case_name": "CASE OF GESTUR J\u00d3NSSON AND RAGNAR HALLD\u00d3R HALL v. ICELAND", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-207115", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2020-12-22 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Sections 222(1), 223(1)-(2) of the Criminal Procedure Act no. 88\/2008 ; Chapter XXVII of the Civil Procedure Act no. 91\/1991\n", "represented_by": "GESTSSON G.", "respondent": "ISL", "articles": "6;6-1;7;7-1;35;35-3-a", "strasbourg_caselaw": "A. Menarini Diagnostics S.R.L. v. Italy, no. 43509\/08, \u00a7 39, 27 September 2011;Balyuk v. Ukraine (dec.), no. 17696\/02, 6 September 2005;Ble\u010di\u0107 v. Croatia [GC], no. 59532\/00, \u00a7 65, ECHR 2006 III;Correia de Matos v. Portugal [GC], no. 56402\/12, \u00a7 139, 4 April 2018;Del R\u00edo Prada v. Spain [GC], no. 42750\/09, \u00a7 81, ECHR 2013;Engel and Others v. the Netherlands, 8 June 1976, \u00a7\u00a7 82-83, Series A no. 22;Ezeh and Connors v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 39665\/98 and 40086\/98, \u00a7 82, ECHR 2003-X;Grande Stevens and Others v. Italy, nos. 18640\/10 and 4 others, \u00a7 99, 4 March 2014;Ilias and Ahmed v. Hungary [GC], no. 47287\/15, \u00a7\u00a7 80, 173 and 250, 21 November 2019;Ilnseher v. Germany [GC], nos. 10211\/12 and 27505\/14, \u00a7\u00a7 100 and 203, 4 December 2018;Jussila v. Finland [GC], no. 73053\/01, \u00a7\u00a7 30-31, ECHR 2006-XIV;Kafkaris v. Cyprus [GC], no. 21906\/04, \u00a7\u00a7 137-142, ECHR 2008;Kubli v. Switzerland (dec.), no. 50364\/99, 21 February 2002;Kyprianou v. Cyprus [GC], no. 73797\/01, \u00a7 173, ECHR 2005 XIII;Kyprianou v. Cyprus, no. 73797\/01, \u00a7 31, 27 January 2004;Mamidakis v. Greece, no. 35533\/04, \u00a7 21, 11 January 2007;M\u00fcller-Hartburg v. Austria, no. 47195\/06, \u00a7 47, 19 February 2013;\u00d6zt\u00fcrk v. Germany, 21 February 1984, \u00a7 50, Series A no. 73;Produkcija Plus Storitveno podjetje d.o.o. v. Slovenia, no. 47072\/15, \u00a7\u00a7 10 and 45, 23 October 2018;Putz v. Austria, 22 February 1996, Reports 1996-I, \u00a7 32;Ramos Nunes de Carvalho e S\u00e1 v. Portugal [GC], nos. 55391\/13 and 2 others, 6 November 2018;Ravnsborg v. Sweden, 23 March 1994, \u00a7\u00a7 33-35, Series A no. 283 B;T. v. Austria, no. 27783\/95, \u00a7\u00a7 63-67, ECHR 2000 XII;Weber v. Switzerland, 22 May 1990, \u00a7\u00a7 31 and 34, Series A no. 177;Zaicevs v. Latvia, no. 65022\/01, 31 July 2007;\u017dugi\u0107 v. Croatia, no. 3699\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 65-68, 31 May 2011", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Alena Pol\u00e1\u010dkov\u00e1;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Branko Lubarda;Georgios A. Serghides;Jon Fridrik Kj\u00f8lbro;Julia Laffranque;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Paul Lemmens;Robert Spano;S\u00edofra O'Leary;St\u00e9phanie Mourou-Vikstr\u00f6m;Yonko Grozev;Georges Ravarani;Ksenija Turkovi\u0107;Pere Pastor Vilanova", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1222JUD006827314" }, "54": { "webcast_id": "6827314_09102019", "hearing_date": "2019-10-09 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Gestur J\u00f3nsson and Ragnar Halld\u00f3r Hall v. Iceland (nos. 68273\/14 and 68271\/14)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "68273\/14", "case_id": "001-187476", "case_name": "CASE OF GESTUR J\u00d3NSSON AND RAGNAR HALLD\u00d3R HALL v. ICELAND", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-187476", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2018-10-30 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 3, "court": "5", "issue": "Sections 141 (1) 196, 205 (3) of the Criminal Procedures Act No. 88\/2008", "represented_by": "GESTSSON G.", "respondent": "ISL", "articles": "6;6-1;7;7-1;35;35-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Azinas v. Cyprus [GC], no. 56679\/00, ECHR 2004-III;Brown v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 38644\/97, 24 November 1998;De Cubber v. Belgium, 26 October 1984, Series A no. 86;Del R\u00edo Prada v. Spain [GC], no. 42750\/09, \u00a7 77, ECHR 2013;Hokkeling v. the Netherlands, no. 30749\/12, \u00a7 58, 14 February 2017;Jorgic v. Germany, no. 74613\/01, \u00a7 109, ECHR 2007-III;Kononov v. Latvia, [GC], no. 36376\/04, \u00a7 198, ECHR 2010;Kyprianou v. Cyprus, [GC], no. 73797\/01, \u00a7 64, 15 December 2005;Moreira Ferreira v. Portugal (no. 2) [GC], no. 19867\/12, \u00a7 83, 11 July 2017;Nicklinson and Lamb v. the United Kingdom (dec.), nos. 2478\/15 and 1787\/15, 23 June 2015;Putz v. Austria, no. 18892\/91, \u00a7 33, 22 February 1996;Ravnsborg v. Sweden, no. 14220\/88, \u00a7\u00a7 30-36, 23 February 1994;Schreiber and Boetsch v. France (dec.), no. 58751\/00, 11 December 2003;Sejdovic v. Italy [GC], no. 56581\/00, ECHR 2006 II;Sergey Zolotukhin v Russia, [GC], no. 14939\/03, \u00a7 53, 10 February 2005;Shkalla v. Albania, no. 26866\/05, \u00a7 67, 10 May 2011;T. v. Austria, no. 27783\/95, \u00a7\u00a7 61-67, 14 November 2000;Toyaksi and Others v. Turkey (dec.), no. 43569\/08, 20 October2010;Unseen ehf v. Iceland, no. 55630\/15, \u00a7 19, 20 March 2018;Vasiliauskas v. Lithuania [GC], no. 35343\/05, \u00a7 154, ECHR 2015;Vu\u010dkovi\u0107 and Others v. Serbia (preliminary objection) [GC], nos. 17153\/11 and 29 others, \u00a7\u00a7 69-70, 25 March 2014;Zaicevs v. Latvia, no. 65022\/01, \u00a7\u00a7 31-36, 31 July 2007;Zugic v. Croatia, no. 3699\/08, 31 May 2011", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing);No violation of Article 7 - No punishment without law (Article 7-1 - Nulla poena sine lege;Nullum crimen sine lege)", "separate_opinion": "FALSE", "judges": "Jon Fridrik Kj\u00f8lbro;Julia Laffranque;Paul Lemmens;Robert Spano;St\u00e9phanie Mourou-Vikstr\u00f6m", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1030JUD006827314" }, "55": { "webcast_id": "6827314_09102019", "hearing_date": "2019-10-09 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Gestur J\u00f3nsson and Ragnar Halld\u00f3r Hall v. Iceland (nos. 68273\/14 and 68271\/14)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "68273\/14", "case_id": "001-161754", "case_name": "JONSSON v. ICELAND", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-161754", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "", "respondent": "ISL", "articles": "6;6-1;6-3-d;7;7-1;P7-2", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Communicated", "separate_opinion": "", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "56": { "webcast_id": "6827314_09102019", "hearing_date": "2019-10-09 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Gestur J\u00f3nsson and Ragnar Halld\u00f3r Hall v. Iceland (nos. 68273\/14 and 68271\/14)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "68271\/14", "case_id": "001-207115", "case_name": "CASE OF GESTUR J\u00d3NSSON AND RAGNAR HALLD\u00d3R HALL v. ICELAND", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-207115", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2020-12-22 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Sections 222(1), 223(1)-(2) of the Criminal Procedure Act no. 88\/2008 ; Chapter XXVII of the Civil Procedure Act no. 91\/1991\n", "represented_by": "GESTSSON G.", "respondent": "ISL", "articles": "6;6-1;7;7-1;35;35-3-a", "strasbourg_caselaw": "A. Menarini Diagnostics S.R.L. v. Italy, no. 43509\/08, \u00a7 39, 27 September 2011;Balyuk v. Ukraine (dec.), no. 17696\/02, 6 September 2005;Ble\u010di\u0107 v. Croatia [GC], no. 59532\/00, \u00a7 65, ECHR 2006 III;Correia de Matos v. Portugal [GC], no. 56402\/12, \u00a7 139, 4 April 2018;Del R\u00edo Prada v. Spain [GC], no. 42750\/09, \u00a7 81, ECHR 2013;Engel and Others v. the Netherlands, 8 June 1976, \u00a7\u00a7 82-83, Series A no. 22;Ezeh and Connors v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 39665\/98 and 40086\/98, \u00a7 82, ECHR 2003-X;Grande Stevens and Others v. Italy, nos. 18640\/10 and 4 others, \u00a7 99, 4 March 2014;Ilias and Ahmed v. Hungary [GC], no. 47287\/15, \u00a7\u00a7 80, 173 and 250, 21 November 2019;Ilnseher v. Germany [GC], nos. 10211\/12 and 27505\/14, \u00a7\u00a7 100 and 203, 4 December 2018;Jussila v. Finland [GC], no. 73053\/01, \u00a7\u00a7 30-31, ECHR 2006-XIV;Kafkaris v. Cyprus [GC], no. 21906\/04, \u00a7\u00a7 137-142, ECHR 2008;Kubli v. Switzerland (dec.), no. 50364\/99, 21 February 2002;Kyprianou v. Cyprus [GC], no. 73797\/01, \u00a7 173, ECHR 2005 XIII;Kyprianou v. Cyprus, no. 73797\/01, \u00a7 31, 27 January 2004;Mamidakis v. Greece, no. 35533\/04, \u00a7 21, 11 January 2007;M\u00fcller-Hartburg v. Austria, no. 47195\/06, \u00a7 47, 19 February 2013;\u00d6zt\u00fcrk v. Germany, 21 February 1984, \u00a7 50, Series A no. 73;Produkcija Plus Storitveno podjetje d.o.o. v. Slovenia, no. 47072\/15, \u00a7\u00a7 10 and 45, 23 October 2018;Putz v. Austria, 22 February 1996, Reports 1996-I, \u00a7 32;Ramos Nunes de Carvalho e S\u00e1 v. Portugal [GC], nos. 55391\/13 and 2 others, 6 November 2018;Ravnsborg v. Sweden, 23 March 1994, \u00a7\u00a7 33-35, Series A no. 283 B;T. v. Austria, no. 27783\/95, \u00a7\u00a7 63-67, ECHR 2000 XII;Weber v. Switzerland, 22 May 1990, \u00a7\u00a7 31 and 34, Series A no. 177;Zaicevs v. Latvia, no. 65022\/01, 31 July 2007;\u017dugi\u0107 v. Croatia, no. 3699\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 65-68, 31 May 2011", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Alena Pol\u00e1\u010dkov\u00e1;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Branko Lubarda;Georgios A. Serghides;Jon Fridrik Kj\u00f8lbro;Julia Laffranque;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Paul Lemmens;Robert Spano;S\u00edofra O'Leary;St\u00e9phanie Mourou-Vikstr\u00f6m;Yonko Grozev;Georges Ravarani;Ksenija Turkovi\u0107;Pere Pastor Vilanova", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1222JUD006827314" }, "57": { "webcast_id": "6827314_09102019", "hearing_date": "2019-10-09 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Gestur J\u00f3nsson and Ragnar Halld\u00f3r Hall v. Iceland (nos. 68273\/14 and 68271\/14)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "68271\/14", "case_id": "001-187476", "case_name": "CASE OF GESTUR J\u00d3NSSON AND RAGNAR HALLD\u00d3R HALL v. ICELAND", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-187476", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2018-10-30 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 3, "court": "5", "issue": "Sections 141 (1) 196, 205 (3) of the Criminal Procedures Act No. 88\/2008", "represented_by": "GESTSSON G.", "respondent": "ISL", "articles": "6;6-1;7;7-1;35;35-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Azinas v. Cyprus [GC], no. 56679\/00, ECHR 2004-III;Brown v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 38644\/97, 24 November 1998;De Cubber v. Belgium, 26 October 1984, Series A no. 86;Del R\u00edo Prada v. Spain [GC], no. 42750\/09, \u00a7 77, ECHR 2013;Hokkeling v. the Netherlands, no. 30749\/12, \u00a7 58, 14 February 2017;Jorgic v. Germany, no. 74613\/01, \u00a7 109, ECHR 2007-III;Kononov v. Latvia, [GC], no. 36376\/04, \u00a7 198, ECHR 2010;Kyprianou v. Cyprus, [GC], no. 73797\/01, \u00a7 64, 15 December 2005;Moreira Ferreira v. Portugal (no. 2) [GC], no. 19867\/12, \u00a7 83, 11 July 2017;Nicklinson and Lamb v. the United Kingdom (dec.), nos. 2478\/15 and 1787\/15, 23 June 2015;Putz v. Austria, no. 18892\/91, \u00a7 33, 22 February 1996;Ravnsborg v. Sweden, no. 14220\/88, \u00a7\u00a7 30-36, 23 February 1994;Schreiber and Boetsch v. France (dec.), no. 58751\/00, 11 December 2003;Sejdovic v. Italy [GC], no. 56581\/00, ECHR 2006 II;Sergey Zolotukhin v Russia, [GC], no. 14939\/03, \u00a7 53, 10 February 2005;Shkalla v. Albania, no. 26866\/05, \u00a7 67, 10 May 2011;T. v. Austria, no. 27783\/95, \u00a7\u00a7 61-67, 14 November 2000;Toyaksi and Others v. Turkey (dec.), no. 43569\/08, 20 October2010;Unseen ehf v. Iceland, no. 55630\/15, \u00a7 19, 20 March 2018;Vasiliauskas v. Lithuania [GC], no. 35343\/05, \u00a7 154, ECHR 2015;Vu\u010dkovi\u0107 and Others v. Serbia (preliminary objection) [GC], nos. 17153\/11 and 29 others, \u00a7\u00a7 69-70, 25 March 2014;Zaicevs v. Latvia, no. 65022\/01, \u00a7\u00a7 31-36, 31 July 2007;Zugic v. Croatia, no. 3699\/08, 31 May 2011", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing);No violation of Article 7 - No punishment without law (Article 7-1 - Nulla poena sine lege;Nullum crimen sine lege)", "separate_opinion": "FALSE", "judges": "Jon Fridrik Kj\u00f8lbro;Julia Laffranque;Paul Lemmens;Robert Spano;St\u00e9phanie Mourou-Vikstr\u00f6m", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1030JUD006827314" }, "58": { "webcast_id": "6827314_09102019", "hearing_date": "2019-10-09 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Gestur J\u00f3nsson and Ragnar Halld\u00f3r Hall v. Iceland (nos. 68273\/14 and 68271\/14)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "68271\/14", "case_id": "001-161753", "case_name": "HALL v. ICELAND", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-161753", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "", "respondent": "ISL", "articles": "6;6-1;6-3-d;7;7-1;P7-2", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Communicated", "separate_opinion": "", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "59": { "webcast_id": "8098212_25092019", "hearing_date": "2019-09-25 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Muhammad and Muhammad v. Romania (no. 80982\/12)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "80982\/12", "case_id": "001-205509", "case_name": "CASE OF MUHAMMAD AND MUHAMMAD v. ROMANIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-205509", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2020-10-15 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Article 85 \u00a7\u00a7 1-5 of Emergency Ordinance (ordonan\u0163ei de urgen\u0163\u0103 a Guvernului \u2013 \u201cOUG\u201d) no. 194\/2002 on the status of aliens in Romania (\u201cOUG no. 194\/2002\u201d) ; Law no. 182\/2002 on the protection of secret information ; Section 3 of Law no. 51\/1991 on national security\n", "represented_by": "CR\u00c2NGARIU E. ; DUMITRU F.", "respondent": "ROU", "articles": "41;P7-1;P7-1-1;P7-1-2", "strasbourg_caselaw": "A. and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 3455\/05, \u00a7 126, ECHR 2009;A. v. the Netherlands, no. 4900\/06, \u00a7 143, 20 July 2010;Abou Amer v. Romania, no. 14521\/03, \u00a7 58, 24 May 2011;Ahmed v. Romania, no. 34621\/03, \u00a7 53, 13 July 2010;Al-Nashif v. Bulgaria, no. 50963\/99, \u00a7 137, 20 June 2002;Amann v. Switzerland [GC], no. 27798\/95, \u00a7 56, ECHR 2000 II;Artico v. Italy, 13 May 1980, \u00a7 33, Series A no. 37;Baltaji v. Bulgaria, no. 12919\/04, 12 July 2011;Beuze v. Belgium [GC], no. 71409\/10, \u00a7 150, 9 November 2018;C.G. and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 1365\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 70-74, 24 April 2008;De Souza Ribeiro v. France [GC], no. 22689\/07, \u00a7 77, ECHR 2012;Fayed v. the United Kingdom, 21 September 1994, \u00a7 54, Series A no. 294 B;Fitt v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 29777\/96, ECHR 2000-II;Fox, Campbell and Hartley v. the United Kingdom, 30 August 1990, \u00a7 41, Series A no. 182, Kerr v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 40451\/98, 7 December 1999;Geleri v. Romania, no. 33118\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 46 and 48, 15 February 2011;Georgia v. Russia (I) [GC], no. 13255\/07, \u00a7 228, ECHR 2014;Iatridis v. Greece (just satisfaction) [GC], no. 31107\/96, \u00a7 54, ECHR 2000 XI;Ibrahim and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 50541\/08 and 3 others, \u00a7\u00a7 252 and 274, 13 September 2016;Ilias and Ahmed v. Hungary [GC], no. 47287\/15, \u00a7 125, 21 November 2019;Jasper v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 27052\/95, \u00a7 52, 16 February 2000;Kaushal and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 1537\/08, 2 September 2010;Klass and Others v. Germany, 6 September 1978, \u00a7\u00a7 55-56, Series A no. 28;Ljatifi v. \u201cthe former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia\u201d, no. 19017\/16, \u00a7 32, 17 May 2018;Lupsa v. Romania, no. 10337\/04, \u00a7 55, ECHR 2006 VII;Maaouia v. France [GC], no. 39652\/98, \u00a7 38, ECHR 2000 X;Magyar Helsinki Bizotts\u00e1g v. Hungary [GC], no. 18030\/11, \u00a7 121, 8 November 2016;Micallef v. Malta [GC], no. 17056\/06, \u00a7 93, ECHR 2009;N.C. v. Italy [GC], no. 24952\/94, \u00a7 56, ECHR 2002 X;\u00d6calan v. Turkey [GC], no. 46221\/99, \u00a7 179, ECHR 2005 IV;Omar v. France, 29 July 1998, \u00a7 34, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 V;Radomilja and Others v. Croatia [GC], nos. 37685\/10 and 22768\/12, \u00a7\u00a7 113-115 and \u00a7 126, 20 March 2018;Raza v. Bulgaria, no. 31465\/08, \u00a7 54, 11 February 2010;Regner v. the Czech Republic [GC], no. 35289\/11, 19 September 2017;Roman Zakharov v. Russia [GC], no. 47143\/06, \u00a7 233, ECHR 2015;S.C. v. Romania, no. 9356\/11, \u00a7 73, 10 February 2015;Schatschaschwili v. Germany [GC], no. 9154\/10, \u00a7\u00a7 107 and 119, ECHR 2015;Sejdovic and Sulejmanovic v. Italy (dec.), no. 57575\/00, 14 March 2002;Sher and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 5201\/11, \u00a7 149, ECHR 2015 (extracts);Soering v. the United Kingdom, 7 July 1989, \u00a7 87, Series A no. 161;Takush v. Greece, no. 2853\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 60-63, 17 January 2012", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 7 - Procedural safeguards relating to expulsion of aliens (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 7 - Expulsion of an alien);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Carlo Ranzoni;Eva Brems;Fran\u00e7oise Tulkens;Ganna Yudkivska;Georgios A. Serghides;Iulia Motoc;Jon Fridrik Kj\u00f8lbro;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Marko Bo\u0161njak;Paul Lemmens;Pauliine Koskelo;Paulo Pinto De Albuquerque;Pieter Van Dijk;Robert Spano;Ksenija Turkovi\u0107;Mar\u00eda El\u00f3segui", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1015JUD008098212" }, "60": { "webcast_id": "1430517_18092019", "hearing_date": "2019-09-18 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Selahattin Demirta\u015f v. Turkey (no. 2) (no. 14305\/17)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "14305\/17", "case_id": "001-207173", "case_name": "CASE OF SELAHATT\u0130N DEM\u0130RTA\u015e v. TURKEY (No. 2)", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-207173", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2020-12-22 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Articles 83, 85, 148 and Provisional Article 20 of the Constitution and its explanatory memorandum ; Articles 100 et seq., 141 \u00a7 1(a) and (d) of the Code of Criminal Procedure ; Articles 214 \u00a7 1, 314 \u00a7\u00a7 1 and 2 of the Criminal Code \n", "represented_by": "KARAMAN M. ; DEMIRTA\u015e G\u00d6KALP A. ; MOLU B. ; DEMIR R. ; ALTIPARMAK K.", "respondent": "TUR", "articles": "5;5-1;5-1-c;5-3;5-4;10;10-1;10-2;18;18+5;34;35;35-1;35-2-b;41;46;46-2;P1-3", "strasbourg_caselaw": "A. v. the United Kingdom, no 35373\/97, \u00a7 79, 17 December 2002;A.M. v. France, no 12148\/18, \u00a7 66, 29 April 2019;A.\u015e. v. Turkey, no 58271\/10, \u00a7 94, 13 September 2016;Akdivar and Others v. Turkey, 16 September 1996, \u00a7 68, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 IV;Aksoy v. Turkey, 18 December 1996, \u00a7 70, Reports 1996 VI;Aleksanyan v. Russia, no 46468\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 239-240, 22 December 2008;Aliyev v. Azerbaijan, nos. 68762\/14 and 71200\/14, \u00a7 152, 20 September 2018;Allan v. the United Kingdom, no 48539\/99, \u00a7 43, ECHR 2002 IX;Alparslan Altan v. Turkey, no 12778\/17, \u00a7\u00a7 127-130 and 139, 16 April 2019;Assanidze v. Georgia [GC], no 71503\/01, \u00a7\u00a7 169 and 202-203, ECHR 2004 II;Baka v. Hungary [GC], no 20261\/12, \u00a7 117, 23 June 2016;Borisenko v. Ukraine, no 25725\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 41 42, 12 January 2012;Bowman v. the United Kingdom, 19 February 1998, \u00a7 42, Reports 1998 I;Buzadji v. the Republic of Moldova [GC], no 23755\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 84-91 and 102, 5 July 2016;Bykov v. Russia [GC], no 4378\/02, \u00a7 110, 10 March 2009;C.G.I.L. and Cofferati v. Italy, no 46967\/07, \u00a7 71, 24 February 2009;Castells v. Spain, 23 April 1992, Series A no 236;Cebotari v. Moldova, no 35615\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 52 53, 13 November 2007;Celniku v. Greece, no 21449\/04, \u00a7 40, 5 July 2007;Centro Europa 7 S.r.l. and Di Stefano v. Italy [GC], no 38433\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 140-142, ECHR 2012;\u00c7i\u00e7ek v. Turkey (dec.), no 72774\/10, \u00a7 62, 3 March 2015;Cordova v. Italy (no 1), no 40877\/98, \u00a7 59, ECHR 2003 I;Cordova v. Italy (no 2), no 45649\/99, \u00a7 60, ECHR 2003 I (extracts);Cristea v. the Republic of Moldova, no 35098\/12, \u00a7 25, 12 February 2019;C\u00fcneyt Polat v. Turkey, no 32211\/07, \u00a7 49, 13 November 2014;De Jorio v. Italy, no 73936\/01, \u00a7 52, 3 June 2004;Decision on the competence of the Court to give an advisory opinion, \u00a7 31, ECHR 2004-VI;Del R\u00edo Prada v. Spain [GC], no 42750\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 138-139, ECHR 2013;Delfi AS v. Estonia [GC], no 64569\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 120-122, ECHR 2015;Demir v. Turkey (dec.), no 51770\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 22-26, 16 October 2012;Dervishi v. Croatia, no 67341\/10, \u00a7\u00a7 124 125, 25 September 2012;Dolenec v. Croatia, no 25282\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 184-185, 26 November 2009;Etxeberria and Others v. Spain, nos. 35579\/03 and 3 others, \u00a7 48, 30 June 2009;Fatullayev v. Azerbaijan, no 40984\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 176-177, 22 April 2010;F\u00e9d\u00e9ration hell\u00e9nique des syndicats des employ\u00e9s du secteur bancaire v. Greece (dec.), no 72808\/10, \u00a7\u00a7 32-45, 6 December 2011;F\u00e9ret v. Belgium, no 15615\/07, \u00a7 65, 16 July 2009;Fern\u00e1ndez Mart\u00ednez v. Spain [GC], no 56030\/07, \u00a7 117, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Fox, Campbell and Hartley v. the United Kingdom, 30 August 1990, \u00a7\u00a7 32 and 34, Series A no 182;G\u00e4fgen v. Germany [GC], no 22978\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 115 and 164, ECHR 2010;Gavril Yosifov v. Bulgaria, no 74012\/01, \u00a7\u00a7 41 and 43, 6 November 2008;Gherghina v. Romania [GC] (dec.), no 42219\/07, \u00a7 85, 9 July 2015;Gorzelik and Others v. Poland [GC], no 44158\/98, \u00a7 65, ECHR 2004 I;Grosaru v. Romania, no 78039\/01, \u00a7 47, ECHR 2010;G\u00fcler and U\u011fur v. Turkey, nos. 31706\/10 and 33088\/10, \u00a7\u00a7 47, 50 and 52, 2 December 2014;G\u00fcrdeniz v. Turkey (dec.), no 59715\/10, \u00a7 41, 18 March 2014;Ila\u015fcu and Others v. Moldova and Russia [GC], no 48787\/99, \u00a7\u00a7 461 and 490, ECHR 2004-VII;Ilgar Mammadov v. Azerbaijan (infringement proceedings) [GC], no 15172\/13, \u00a7 182, 29 May 2019;Ilgar Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, no 15172\/13, 22 May 2014;Ilias and Ahmed v. Hungary [GC], no 47287\/15, \u00a7\u00a7 167-178, 21 November 2019;Il\u0131cak v. Turkey, no 15394\/02, \u00a7 30, 5 April 2007;Ilnseher v. Germany [GC], nos. 10211\/12 and 27505\/14, \u00a7\u00a7 251-256, 4 December 2018;J\u0117\u010dius v. Lithuania, no 34578\/97, \u00a7 50, ECHR 2000 IX;Jerusalem v. Austria, no 26958\/95, \u00a7 36, ECHR 2001 II;Kandjov v. Bulgaria, no 68294\/01, \u00a7 57, 6 November 2008;Kar\u00e1csony and Others v. Hungary [GC], nos. 42461\/13 and 44357\/13, 17 May 2016;Karoussiotis v. Portugal, no 23205\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 57-76, ECHR 2011 (extracts);Kart v. Turkey [GC], no 8917\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 42, 85 and 88, ECHR 2009 (extracts);Kavak\u00e7\u0131 v. Turkey, no 71907\/01, \u00a7\u00a7 40-41, 5 April 2007;Kavala v. Turkey, no 28749\/18, 10 December 2019;Kolevi v. Bulgaria (dec.), no 1108\/02, 4 December 2007;Korbely v. Hungary [GC], no 9174\/02, \u00a7 72, ECHR 2008;Kudrevi\u010dius and Others v. Lithuania [GC], no 37553\/05, \u00a7 108, ECHR 2015;Kuri\u0107 and Others v. Slovenia [GC], no 26828\/06, \u00a7 259, ECHR 2012 (extracts);Letellier v. France, 26 June 1991, \u00a7 34, Series A no 207;Lindon, Otchakovsky-Laurens and July v. France [GC], nos. 21279\/02 and 36448\/02, \u00a7 41, ECHR 2007 IV;Lingens v. Austria, 8 July 1986, \u00a7\u00a7 41 and 42, Series A no 103;Lukanov v. Bulgaria, no 21915\/93, decision of the Commission of 12 January 1995, Decisions and Reports (DR) 80-B, p. 108;L\u00fctfiye Zengin and Others v. Turkey, no 36443\/06, 14 April 2015;Lykourezos v. Greece, no 33554\/03, \u00a7\u00a7 54-56, ECHR 2006 VIII;Maestri v. Italy [GC], no 39748\/98, \u00a7 30, ECHR 2004 I;Magyar Helsinki Bizotts\u00e1g v. Hungary [GC], no 18030\/11, \u00a7 184, 8 November 2016;Magyar K\u00e9tfark\u00fa Kutya P\u00e1rt v. Hungary [GC], no 201\/17, \u00a7\u00a7 94-97, 20 January 2020;Malone v. the United Kingdom, 2 August 1984, \u00a7 67, Series A no 82;Mammadli v. Azerbaijan, no 47145\/14, \u00a7\u00a7 52 and 104, 19 April 2018;Mathieu-Mohin and Clerfayt v. Belgium, 2 March 1987, \u00a7\u00a7 47 and 52, Series A no 113;Mehmet Hasan Altan v. Turkey, no 13237\/17, 20 March 2018;Merabishvili v. Georgia [GC], no 72508\/13, \u00a7\u00a7 222-225 and 287-317, 28 November 2017;Mergen and Others v. Turkey, nos. 44062\/09 and 4 others, \u00a7 48, 31 May 2016;Mikolenko v. Estonia (dec.), no 16944\/03, 5 January 2006;Molla Sali v. Greece [GC], no 20452\/14, \u00a7\u00a7 89-91, 19 December 2018;Mooren v. Germany [GC], no 11364\/03, \u00a7 72, 9 July 2009;Mugemangango v. Belgium [GC], no 310\/15, \u00a7 67, 10 July 2020;Murray v. the United Kingdom, 28 October 1994, \u00a7 55, Series A no 300-A;Murtazaliyeva v. Russia [GC], no 36658\/05, \u00a7 88, 18 December 2018;Mustafa Avci v. Turkey, no 39322\/12, \u00a7 60, 23 May 2017;N\u0103stase v. Romania (dec.), no 80563\/12, \u00a7 109, 18 November 2014;Navalnyy v. Russia [GC], nos. 29580\/12 and 4 others, 15 November 2018;O\u2019Hara v. the United Kingdom, no 37555\/97, \u00a7\u00a7 34-35, ECHR 2001 X;Olsson v. Sweden (no 1), 24 March 1988, \u00a7 61, Series A no 130;Otegi Mondragon v. Spain, no 2034\/07, \u00a7 50, ECHR 2011;Pa\u015fa Bayraktar and Ayd\u0131nkaya v. Turkey, no 38337\/12, \u00a7\u00a7 24-31, 16 May 2017;Past\u00f6rs v. Germany, no 55225\/14, \u00a7 38, 3 October 2019;Patrono, Cascini and Stefanelli v. Italy, no 10180\/04, \u00a7 61, 20 April 2006;Peraldi v. France (dec.), no 2096\/05, 7 April 2009;Piotr Baranowski v. Poland, no 39742\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 45-46, 2 October 2007;Podkolzina v. Latvia, no 46726\/99, \u00a7 33, ECHR 2002 II;Poyraz v. Turkey (dec.), no 21235\/11, \u00a7 53, 17 February 2015;Radomilja and Others v. Croatia [GC], nos. 37685\/10 and 22768\/12, \u00a7 119, 20 March 2018;Rahmani and Dineva v. Bulgaria, no 20116\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 66 and 68, 10 May 2012;Ramos Nunes de Carvalho e S\u00e1 v. Portugal [GC], nos. 55391\/13 and 2 others, \u00a7 109, 6 November 2018;Rasul Jafarov v. Azerbaijan, no 69981\/14, \u00a7 162, 17 March 2016;Riza and Others v. Bulgaria, nos. 48555\/10 and 48377\/10, \u00a7 141, 13 October 2015;Roman Zakharov v. Russia [GC], no 47143\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 228 and 230, ECHR 2015;Rooman v. Belgium [GC], no 18052\/11, \u00a7 123, 31 January 2019;Rotaru v. Romania [GC], no 28341\/95, \u00a7 52, ECHR 2000-V;S., V. and A. v. Denmark [GC], nos. 35553\/12 and 2 others, \u00a7 73, 22 October 2018;Sadak and Others v. Turkey (no 2), nos. 25144\/94 and 8 others, \u00a7\u00a7 31 and 33, ECHR 2002 IV;\u015eahin Alpay v. Turkey, no 16538\/17, 20 March 2018;Satakunnan Markkinap\u00f6rssi Oy and Satamedia Oy v. Finland [GC], no 931\/13, \u00a7\u00a7 144-219, 27 June 2017;Scordino v. Italy (no 1) [GC], no 36813\/97, \u00a7\u00a7 179-180, ECHR 2006 V;Sejdovic v. Italy [GC], no 56581\/00, \u00a7 46, ECHR 2006-II;Selmouni v. France [GC], no 25803\/94, \u00a7 76, ECHR 1999 V;S\u0131lay v. Turkey, no 8691\/02, \u00a7 27, 5 April 2007;Sobac\u0131 v. Turkey, no 26733\/02, \u00a7 26, 29 November 2007;Stanev v. Bulgaria [GC], no 36760\/06, \u00a7 143, ECHR 2012;Svinarenko and Slyadnev v. Russia [GC], nos. 32541\/08 and 43441\/08, \u00a7 82, ECHR 2014 (extracts);T\u0103nase v. Moldova [GC], no 7\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 105 and 154, ECHR 2010;Tomasi v. France, 27 August 1992, \u00a7 83, Series A no 241 A;Ulemek v. Croatia, no 21613\/16, \u00a7\u00a7 72-74, 31 October 2019;Uspaskich v. Lithuania, no 14737\/08, \u00a7 94, 20 December 2016;Vallianatos and Others v. Greece [GC], nos. 29381\/09 and 32684\/09, \u00a7 52, ECHR 2013 (extracts);Vedat Do\u011fru v. Turkey, no 2469\/10, \u00a7 37, 5 April 2016;Vu\u010dkovi\u0107 and Others v. Serbia (preliminary objection) [GC], nos. 17153\/11 and 29 others, \u00a7 74, 25 March 2014;Waite and Kennedy v. Germany [GC], no 26083\/94, \u00a7 54, ECHR 1999 I;Weeks v. the United Kingdom, 2 March 1987, \u00a7 40, Series A no 114;Wemhoff v. Germany, 27 June 1968, p. 23, \u00a7 9, Series A no 7;W\u0142och v. Poland, no 27785\/95, \u00a7\u00a7 108-109, ECHR 2000 XI;Yavuz and Yaylal\u0131 v. Turkey, no 12606\/11, \u00a7 51, 17 December 2013;Y\u00fcksel and Others v. Turkey, nos. 55835\/09 and 2 others, \u00a7 52, 31 May 2016;\u017ddanoka v. Latvia [GC], no 58278\/00, \u00a7\u00a7 102 and 115, ECHR 2006 IV;Zollmann v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no 62902\/00, ECHR 2003 XII", "external_sources": "Opinion of the European Commission for Democracy through Law (Venice Commission) on Articles 216, 299, 301 and 314 of the Turkish Criminal Code;Opinion of the Venice Commission on the suspension of the second paragraph of Article 83 of the Constitution;Memorandum by the Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights following his visits to Turkey in 2016;Amnesty International 2017\/18 report on the state of the world\u2019s human rights \n", "conclusion": "Preliminary objections dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;(Art. 35-1) Effective domestic remedy;(Art. 35-2-b) Matter already submitted to another international procedure;Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Victim;Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression-{general} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention;Article 5-1-c - Reasonable suspicion);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Reasonableness of pre-trial detention);No violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Speediness of review);Violation of Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 - Right to free elections-{general} (Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 - Free expression of the opinion of the people;Stand for election);Violation of Article 18+5 - Limitation on use of restrictions on rights (Article 18 - Restrictions for unauthorised purposes) (Article 5 - Right to liberty and security;Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention);Pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Respondent State to take individual measures (Article 46-2 - Individual measures)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Alena Pol\u00e1\u010dkov\u00e1;Ale\u0161 Pejchal;Andr\u00e9 Potocki;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Armen Harutyunyan;Egidijus K\u016bris;Helen Keller;Jon Fridrik Kj\u00f8lbro;Krzysztof Wojtyczek;Ledi Bianku;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;M\u0101rti\u0146\u0161 Mits;Paul Lemmens;Pauliine Koskelo;Robert Spano;Vincent A. De Gaetano;Yonko Grozev;Gabriele Kucsko-Stadlmayer;Ksenija Turkovi\u0107;Tim Eicke", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1222JUD001430517" }, "61": { "webcast_id": "1430517_18092019", "hearing_date": "2019-09-18 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Selahattin Demirta\u015f v. Turkey (no. 2) (no. 14305\/17)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "14305\/17", "case_id": "001-187961", "case_name": "CASE OF SELAHATT\u0130N DEM\u0130RTA\u015e v. TURKEY (No. 2)", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-187961", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2018-11-20 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 3, "court": "5", "issue": "Articles 100 \u00a7 3 and 141 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (\u201cthe CCP\u201d) ; Article 18 of the Constitution", "represented_by": "KARAMAN M.", "respondent": "TUR", "articles": "5;5-1;5-1-c;5-3;5-4;18;18+5-3;34;35;35-1;35-2-b;35-3-a;41;46;46-2;P1-3", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Agit Demir v. Turkey, no 36475\/10, \u00a7 39, 27 February 2018;Ali R\u0131za Kaplan v. Turkey, no 24597\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 19-23, 13 November 2014;Al-Jedda v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 27021\/08, \u00a7 99, ECHR 2011;Assanidze v. Georgia [GC], no 71503\/01, ECHR 2004 II;Azzolina and Others v. Italy, nos. 28923\/09 and 67599\/10, \u00a7 105, 26 October 2017;Balbay v. Turkey, (dec.), nos. 666\/11 and 73745\/11, \u00a7 69, 3 March 2015;Baranowski v. Poland, no 28358\/95, \u00a7 52, ECHR 2000 III;Baumann v. France, no 33592\/96, \u00a7 47, ECHR 2001 V (extracts);Buzadji v. the Republic of Moldova [GC], no 23755\/07, ECHR 2016 (extracts);Cahit Demirel v. Turkey, no 18623\/03, \u00a7\u00a7 21 28, 7 July 2009;Castells v. Spain, 23 April 1992, \u00a7 42, Series A no 236;Ceviz v. Turkey, no 8140\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 41 44, 17 July 2012;\u00c7i\u00e7ek v. Turkey (dec.), no 72774\/10, \u00a7 62, 3 March 2015;Clooth v. Belgium, 12 December 1991, \u00a7 44, Series A no 225;Contrada v. Italy, 24 August 1998, \u00a7\u00a7 58 65, Reports 1998-V;Cordova v. Italy (no 1), no 40877\/98, \u00a7 59, ECHR 2003-I;Creang\u0103 v. Romania [GC], no 29226\/03, \u00a7 101, 23 February 2012;D.N. v. Switzerland [GC], no 27154\/95, \u00a7 41, ECHR 2001 III;Del R\u00edo Prada v. Spain [GC], no 42750\/09, ECHR 2013;Ers\u00f6z v. Turkey (dec.), no 45746\/11, \u00a7 50, 17 February 2015;Etxeberria and Others v. Spain, nos. 35579\/03 and 3 others, \u00a7 48, 30 June 2009;Fatullayev v. Azerbaijan, no 40984\/07, \u00a7 172, 22 April 2010;Fox, Campbell and Hartley v. the United Kingdom, 30 August 1990, \u00a7 32, Series A no 182;Galip Do\u011fru v. Turkey, no 36001\/06, \u00a7 58, 28 April 2015;Gavril Yosifov v. Bulgaria, no 74012\/01, \u00a7 40, 6 November 2008;Grosaru v. Romania, no 78039\/01, \u00a7 47, ECHR 2010;Giorgi Nikolaishvili v. Georgia, no 37048\/04, \u00a7\u00a7 73 and 76, 13 January 2009;G\u00fcrdeniz v. Turkey, (dec.), no 59715\/10, \u00a7 37, 18 March 2014;\u0130brahim G\u00fcler v. Turkey, no 1942\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 19-27, 15 October 2013;Idalov v. Russia [GC], no 5826\/03, \u00a7 145, 22 May 2012;Ila\u015fcu and Others v. Moldova and Russia [GC], no 48787\/99, \u00a7 487, ECHR 2004-VII;Ilgar Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, no 15172\/13, \u00a7 90, 22 May 2014;Il\u0131cak v. Turkey, no 15394\/02, \u00a7 30, 5 April 2007;Ilijkov v. Bulgaria, no 33977\/96, 26 July 2001;J\u0117\u010dius v. Lithuania, no 34578\/97, \u00a7 50, ECHR 2000 IX;Kar\u00e1csony and Others v. Hungary [GC], nos. 42461\/13 and 44357\/13, \u00a7 141, 17 May 2016;Karoussiotis v. Portugal, no 23205\/08, \u00a7 57, ECHR 2011 (extracts);Kavak\u00e7\u0131 v. Turkey, no 71907\/01, \u00a7\u00a7 40-41, 5 April 2007;Ko\u00e7intar v. Turkey (dec.), no 77429\/12, \u00a7\u00a7 30-46, 1 July 2014;Kolomenskiy v. Russia, no 27297\/07, \u00a7 88, 13 December 2016;Korenjak v. Slovenia (dec.), no 463\/03, \u00a7 73, 15 May 2007;Korkmaz and Others v. Turkey, no 35979\/97, \u00a7\u00a7 24-26, 21 March 2006;Ku\u010dera v. Slovakia, no 48666\/99, \u00a7 94, 17 July 2007;Labita v. Italy [GC], no 26772\/95, \u00a7 170, ECHR 2000 IV;Lamy v. Belgium, 30 March 1989, \u00a7 29, Series A no 151;Letellier v. France, 26 June 1991, Series A no 207;Lietzow v. Germany, no 24479\/94, \u00a7 44, ECHR 2001 I;Lingens v. Austria, 8 July 1986, \u00a7\u00a7 41 and 42, Series A no 103;Lukanov v. Bulgaria, no 21915\/93, decision of the Commission of 12 January 1995, Decisions and Reports (DR) 80-B, p. 108;Lukovi\u0107 v. Serbia, no 43808\/07, \u00a7 54, 26 March 2013;Lykourezos v. Greece, no 33554\/03, \u00a7 56, ECHR 2006-VIII;M. v. Germany, no 19359\/04, \u00a7 90, ECHR 2009;Maestri v. Italy [GC], no 39748\/98, \u00a7 47, ECHR 2004 I;Mathieu-Mohin and Clerfayt v. Belgium, 2 March 1987, Series A no 113;McKay v. the United Kingdom [GC], n\u00ba 543\/03, \u00a7 44, ECHR 2006 X;Megyeri v. Germany, 12 May 1992, \u00a7 22, Series A no 237 A;Mehmet Hasan Altan v. Turkey, no 13237\/17, 20 March 2018;Merabishvili v. Georgia [GC], no 72508\/13, \u00a7 222, 28 November 2017;Mergen and Others v. Turkey, nos. 44062\/09 and 4 others, \u00a7 48, 31 May 2016;Metin v. Turkey (dec.), no 77479\/11, \u00a7 57, 3 March 2015;Mooren v. Germany [GC], no 11364\/03, 9 July 2009;Murray v. the United Kingdom, 28 October 1994, Series A no 300 A;Mustafa Avci v. Turkey, no 39322\/12, 23 May 2017;N\u0103stase v. Romania (dec.), no 80563\/12, \u00a7 109, 18 November 2014;Nedim \u015eener v. Turkey, no 38270\/11, \u00a7 70, 8 July 2014;Neumeister v. Austria, 27 June 1968, p. 37, \u00a7\u00a7 4-5, Series A no 8;Nikolova v. Bulgaria [GC], no 31195\/96, \u00a7 58, ECHR 1999 II;O\u2019Hara v. the United Kingdom, no 37555\/97, \u00a7 34, ECHR 2001 X;Oshurko v. Ukraine, no 33108\/05, \u00a7 98, 8 September 2011;Ovsjannikov v. Estonia, no 1346\/12, \u00a7\u00a7 72-78, 20 February 2014;Paksas v. Lithuania [GC], no 34932\/04, \u00a7 97, ECHR 2011 (extracts);Peraldi v. France (dec.), no 2096\/05, 7 April 2009;Podkolzina v. Latvia, no 46726\/99, \u00a7 33, ECHR 2002-II;Poyraz v. Turkey (dec.), no 21235\/11, \u00a7 53, 17 February 2015;Rasul Jafarov v. Azerbaijan, no 69981\/14, \u00a7 170, 17 March 2016;Reinprecht v. Austria, no 67175\/01, \u00a7 39, ECHR 2005 XII;Riza and Others v. Bulgaria, nos. 48555\/10 and 48377\/10, \u00a7 141, 13 October 2015;Roseiro Bento v. Portugal (dec.), no 29288\/02, ECHR 2004-XII (extracts);Sadak and Others v. Turkey (no 2), nos. 25144\/94 and 8 others, \u00a7\u00a7 31- 33, ECHR 2002 IV;\u015eahin Alpay v. Turkey, no 16538\/17, 20 March 2018;Sch\u00f6ps v. Germany, no 25116\/94, \u00a7 44, ECHR 2001-I;Scozzari and Giunta v. Italy [GC], nos. 39221\/98 and 41963\/98, \u00a7 249, ECHR 2000 VIII;\u015e\u0131k v. Turkey, no 53413\/11, \u00a7 62, 8 July 2014;S\u0131lay v. Turkey, no 8691\/02, \u00a7 27, 5 April 2007;Smatana v. the Czech Republic, no 18642\/04, \u00a7\u00a7 119-124, 27 September 2007;Smirnova v. Russia, nos. 46133\/99 and 48183\/99, \u00a7\u00a7 60-63, ECHR 2003 IX (extracts);Sobac\u0131 v. Turkey, no 26733\/02, \u00a7 27, 29 November 2007;Stanev v. Bulgaria [GC], no 36760\/06, \u00a7 143, ECHR 2012;Stanka Mirkovi\u0107 and Others v. Montenegro, nos. 33781\/15 and 3 others, \u00a7 48, 7 March 2017;St\u00f6gm\u00fcller v. Austria, 10 November 1969, p. 40, \u00a7 4, Series A n\u00ba 9;S\u00fcleyman Erdem v. Turkey, no 49574\/99, \u00a7 37, 19 September 2006;T\u0103nase v. Moldova [GC], no 7\/08, \u00a7 154, ECHR 2010;Uspaskich v. Lithuania, no 14737\/08, 20 December 2016;Verein gegen Tierfabriken Schweiz (VgT) v. Switzerland (no 2) [GC], no 32772\/02, \u00a7 85, ECHR 2009;Voisine v. France, no 27362\/95, decision of the Commission of 14 January 1998;W. v. Switzerland, 26 January 1993, \u00a7 33, Series A no 254 A;Weeks v. the United Kingdom, 2 March 1987, \u00a7 40, Series A no 114;Wemhoff v. Germany, 27 June 1968, p. 25, \u00a7\u00a712-15, Series A no 7;Whiteside v. Royaume Uni, no 20357\/92, decision of the Commission of 7 March 1994;W\u0142och v. Poland, no 27785\/95, \u00a7 108, ECHR 2000 XI;Y\u00fcksel and Others v. Turkey, nos. 55835\/09 and 2 others, \u00a7 52, 31 May 2016;\u017ddanoka v. Latvia [GC], no 58278\/00, \u00a7 115, ECHR 2006 IV;\u017d\u00fabor v. Slovakia, no 7711\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 71 77, 6 December 2011", "external_sources": "Memorandum by the Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights following his visits to Turkey in 2016;Opinion of the European Commission for Democracy through Law (Venice Commission) on the suspension of the second paragraph of Article 83 of the Constitution;Opinion on the amendments to the Constitution adopted by the Grand National Assembly on 21 January 2017 and submitted to a national referendum on 16 April 2017, adopted by the Venice Commission;Amnesty International Report 2017\/2018: The state of the world\u2019s human rights", "conclusion": "Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-2-b) Matter already submitted to another international procedure;Preliminary objection allowed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;No violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention;Article 5-1-c - Reasonable suspicion);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Length of pre-trial detention;Reasonableness of pre-trial detention);No violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Speediness of review);Violation of Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 - Right to free elections-{general} (Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 - Free expression of the opinion of the people;Stand for election);Violation of Article 18+5-3 - Limitation on use of restrictions on rights (Article 18 - Restrictions for unauthorised purposes) (Article 5 - Right to liberty and security;Article 5-3 - Reasonableness of pre-trial detention);No violation of Article 34 - Individual applications (Article 34 - Hinder the exercise of the right of application);Respondent State to take individual measures (Article 46-2 - Individual measures);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Jon Fridrik Kj\u00f8lbro;Ledi Bianku;Paul Lemmens;Robert Spano", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1120JUD001430517" }, "62": { "webcast_id": "5817013_10072019", "hearing_date": "2019-07-10 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Big Brother Watch and Others v. the United Kingdom (nos. 58170\/13, 62322\/14 and 24960\/15)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "58170\/13", "case_id": "001-210077", "case_name": "CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-210077", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2021-05-25 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 (\u201cRIPA\u201d) ; Interception of Communications Code of Practice (the \u201cIC Code\u201d)\n", "represented_by": "CAREY D. ; CURLING R. ; NORTON E.", "respondent": "GBR", "articles": "8;8-1;8-2;10;10-1;10-2;34", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Al-Skeini and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 55721\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 130-139, ECHR 2011;Amann v. Switzerland [GC], no. 27798\/95, \u00a7 69, ECHR 2000 II;Association for European Integration and Human Rights and Ekimdzhiev v. Bulgaria, no. 62540\/00, \u00a7 75, 28 June 2007;Centrum f\u00f6r r\u00e4ttvisa v. Sweden, no. 35252\/08, 19 June 2018;Goodwin v. the United Kingdom, no. 17488\/90, \u00a7 39, 27 March 1996;Heglas v. the Czech Republic, no. 5935\/02, \u00a7 74, 1 March 2007;Huvig v. France, 24 April 1990, Series A no. 176 B;Jaloud v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 47708\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 139 and 151 ECHR 2014;Kennedy v. the United Kingdom, no. 26839\/05, \u00a7 130, 18 May 2010;Klass and Others v. Germany, 6 September 1978, \u00a7\u00a7 55 and 56, Series A no. 28;Kruslin v. France, 24 April 1990, Series A no. 176 A;Leander v. Sweden, 26 March 1987, Series A no. 116;Liberty and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 58243\/00, 1 July 2008;Malone v. the United Kingdom, 2 August 1984, Series A no. 82;Nordisk Film & TV A\/S v. Denmark (dec.), no. 40485\/02, ECHR 2005 XIII;Roemen and Schmit v. Luxembourg, no. 51772\/99, \u00a7\u00a7 46 and 57, ECHR 2003 IV;Roman Zakharov v. Russia [GC], no. 47143\/06, ECHR 2015;Rotaru v. Romania [GC], no. 28341\/95, ECHR 2000 V;S. and Marper v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 30562\/04 and 30566\/04, ECHR 2008;S.M. v. Croatia [GC], no. 60561\/14, \u00a7 216, 25 June 2020;Sanoma Uitgevers B.V. v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 38224\/03, 14 September 2010;Segerstedt-Wiberg and Others v. Sweden, no. 62332\/00, \u00a7 120, ECHR 2006 VII;Szab\u00f3 and Vissy v. Hungary, no. 37138\/14, 12 January 2016;Valenzuela Contreras v. Spain, 30 July 1998, \u00a7 46, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 V;Voskuil v. the Netherlands, no. 64752\/01, \u00a7 65, 22 November 2007;Weber and Saravia v. Germany (dec.), no. 54934\/00, ECHR 2006\u2011XI;Wieser and Bicos Beteiligungen GmbH v. Austria, no. 74336\/01, \u00a7\u00a7 62-66, ECHR 2007 XI", "external_sources": "Report of the European Commission for Democracy through Law (the \u201cVenice Commission\u201d) on the Democratic Oversight of Signals Intelligence Agencies (2015);Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Security Act (\u201cFISA\u201d)\n", "conclusion": "Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Victim;Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression-{general} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression);Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression-{general} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression);No violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression-{general} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Ale\u0161 Pejchal;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Armen Harutyunyan;Carlo Ranzoni;Jon Fridrik Kj\u00f8lbro;Kristina Pardalos;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Marko Bo\u0161njak;M\u0101rti\u0146\u0161 Mits;Paul Lemmens;Pauliine Koskelo;Paulo Pinto De Albuquerque;Robert Spano;Vincent A. De Gaetano;Yonko Grozev;Gabriele Kucsko-Stadlmayer;Ksenija Turkovi\u0107;Tim Eicke", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0525JUD005817013" }, "63": { "webcast_id": "5817013_10072019", "hearing_date": "2019-07-10 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Big Brother Watch and Others v. the United Kingdom (nos. 58170\/13, 62322\/14 and 24960\/15)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "58170\/13", "case_id": "001-186048", "case_name": "CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-186048", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2018-09-13 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 3, "court": "4", "issue": "Chapter 12 and paragraphs 4.1-4.8, 6.22-6.24, 6.7, 7.2, 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, 7.6, 7.7, 7.8, 7.9, 7.15, 7.16, 7.17, 7.18 and 12.5 of the Interception of Communications Code of Practice (\u201cIC Code Practice\u201d) ; Chapter II and sections 5(3), 5(6), 8(1), 8(4), 9, 15, 15(2), 15(3), 15(4), 16, 16(2)(a), 16(2)(b), 16(3), 20, 22 and 81 of RIPA ; Paragraphs 2.24-2.27, 3.76 and 3.78-3.84 of the ACD Code ; Article 77-1-1 of the Criminal Procedure Code ; Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (\u201cPACE\u201d) ; Part 1 of Schedule 1 to the Data Protection Act 1998 ; Terrorism Act 2000 ; Section 19(2), (3), (4) and (5) of the Counter-Terrorism Act 2008 ; Investigatory Powers Act 2016 ; British-US Communication Intelligence Agreement of 5 March 1946 ; Security Services Act 1989 (\u201cSSA\u201d) ; Intelligence Services Act 1994 (\u201cISA\u201d) ; Section 1(1) of the Official Secrets Act 1989 (\u201cOSA\u201d)", "represented_by": "CAREY D. ; CURLING R. ; NORTON E.", "respondent": "GBR", "articles": "8;8-1;8-2;10;10-1;10-2;35;35-3-a", "strasbourg_caselaw": "A. and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 3455\/05, \u00a7 181, ECHR 2009;A. v. the Netherlands, no. 4900\/06, \u00a7 143, 20 July 2010;Akdivar and Others v. Turkey, 16 September 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 IV;Al-Skeini and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 55721\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 130-139, ECHR 2011;Anthony France and Others v. the United Kingdom (dec.), nos. 25357\/16, 25514\/16, 25552\/16 and 25597\/16, 26 September 2016;Association for European Integration and Human Rights and Ekimdzhiev v. Bulgaria, no. 62540\/00, 28 June 2007;Axel Springer AG v. Germany [GC], no. 39954\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 85-88, 7 February 2012;Ben Faiza v. France, no. 31446\/12, 8 February 2018;Bosphorus Hava Yollar\u0131 Turizm ve Ticaret Anonim \u015eirketi v. Ireland [GC], no. 45036\/98, \u00a7 165 ECHR 2005 VI;Burden v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 13378\/05, \u00a7 43, ECHR 2008;Chahal v. the United Kingdom, 15 November 1996, \u00a7 79, Reports 1996 V;Charron and Merle Montet v. France (dec), no. 22612\/15, \u00a7 30, 16 January 2018;Courtney v. Ireland (dec), no. 69558\/10, 18 December 2012;Demopoulos and Others v. Turkey (dec.) [GC], nos. 46113\/99, 3843\/02, 13751\/02, 13466\/03, 10200\/04, 14163\/04, 19993\/04 and 21819\/04, ECHR 2010;Goodwin v. the United Kingdom, 27 March 1996, Reports 1996 II;Gough v. the United Kingdom, no. 49327\/11, \u00a7 140, 28 October 2014;Heglas v. the Czech Republic, no. 5935\/02, \u00a7 74, 1 March 2007;Huvig v. France, 24 April 1990, Series A no. 176 B;Ireland v. the United Kingdom, 18 January 1978, Series A no. 25;Jaloud v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 47708\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 139 and 151 ECHR 2014;Klass and Others v. Germany, 6 September 1978, Series A no. 28;Kokkinakis v. Greece, 25 May 1993, \u00a7 40, Series A no. 260 A;Lawless v. Ireland (no. 3), 1 July 1961, \u00a7\u00a7 28\u201330, Series A no. 3;Leander v. Sweden, 26 March 1987, Series A no. 116;Liberty and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 58243\/00, 1 July 2008;Magee v. the United Kingdom, no. 28135\/95, \u00a7 50, ECHR 2000 VI;Malone v. the United Kingdom, 2 August 1984, Series A no. 82;McFarlane v. Ireland [GC], no. 31333\/06, \u00a7 107, 10 September 2010;MGN Limited v. the United Kingdom, no. 39401\/04, \u00a7\u00a7 140-155, 18 January 2011;Mustafa Sezgin Tanr\u0131kulu v. Turkey, no. 27473\/06, 18 July 2017;\u00d6calan v. Turkey [GC], no. 46221\/99, \u00a7 179, ECHR 2005 IV;Othman (Abu Qatada) v. United Kingdom, no. 8139\/09, \u00a7 183, ECHR 2012;Palomo S\u00e1nchez and Others v. Spain [GC], nos. 28955\/06, 28957\/06, 28959\/06 and 28964\/06, \u00a7 57, 12 September 2011;R.E. v. the United Kingdom, no. 62498\/11, 27 October 2015;Roemen and Schmit v. Luxembourg, no. 51772\/99, ECHR 2003-IV;Roman Zakharov v. Russia [GC], no. 47143\/06, ECHR 2015;Rotaru v. Romania [GC], no. 28341\/95, ECHR 2000 V;S. and Marper v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 30562\/04 and 30566\/04, ECHR 2008;Sanoma Uitgevers B.V. v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 38224\/03, 14 September 2010;Scoppola v. Italy (no. 2) [GC], no. 10249\/03, \u00a7 70, 17 September 2009;Sejdovic v. Italy [GC], no. 56581\/00, \u00a7 46, ECHR 2006 II;Szab\u00f3 and Vissy v. Hungary, no. 37138\/14, 12 January 2016;Trabelsi v. Belgium, no. 140\/10, \u00a7 117, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Uzun v. Germany, no. 35623\/05, ECHR 2010 (extracts);Valenzuela Contreras v. Spain, 30 July 1998, Reports 1998 V;Voskuil v. the Netherlands, no. 64752\/01, \u00a7 65, 22 November 2007;Vu\u010dkovi\u0107 and Others v. Serbia (preliminary objection) [GC], nos. 17153\/11 and 29 others, 25 March 2014;Weber and Saravia v. Germany (dec.), no. 54934\/00, ECHR 2006\u2011XI", "external_sources": "2015 Report of the European Commission for Democracy through Law (\u201cVenice Commission\u201d) on the Democratic Oversight of Signals Intelligence Agencies;2016 annual report of the Interception of Communications Commissioner", "conclusion": "Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression-{general} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Ale\u0161 Pejchal;Armen Harutyunyan;Kristina Pardalos;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Pauliine Koskelo;Ksenija Turkovi\u0107;Tim Eicke", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0913JUD005817013" }, "64": { "webcast_id": "5817013_10072019", "hearing_date": "2019-07-10 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Big Brother Watch and Others v. the United Kingdom (nos. 58170\/13, 62322\/14 and 24960\/15)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "58170\/13", "case_id": "001-140713", "case_name": "BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-140713", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "", "respondent": "GBR", "articles": "8;8-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "", "separate_opinion": "", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "65": { "webcast_id": "5817013_10072019", "hearing_date": "2019-07-10 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Big Brother Watch and Others v. the United Kingdom (nos. 58170\/13, 62322\/14 and 24960\/15)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "62322\/14", "case_id": "001-210077", "case_name": "CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-210077", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2021-05-25 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 (\u201cRIPA\u201d) ; Interception of Communications Code of Practice (the \u201cIC Code\u201d)\n", "represented_by": "CAREY D. ; CURLING R. ; NORTON E.", "respondent": "GBR", "articles": "8;8-1;8-2;10;10-1;10-2;34", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Al-Skeini and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 55721\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 130-139, ECHR 2011;Amann v. Switzerland [GC], no. 27798\/95, \u00a7 69, ECHR 2000 II;Association for European Integration and Human Rights and Ekimdzhiev v. Bulgaria, no. 62540\/00, \u00a7 75, 28 June 2007;Centrum f\u00f6r r\u00e4ttvisa v. Sweden, no. 35252\/08, 19 June 2018;Goodwin v. the United Kingdom, no. 17488\/90, \u00a7 39, 27 March 1996;Heglas v. the Czech Republic, no. 5935\/02, \u00a7 74, 1 March 2007;Huvig v. France, 24 April 1990, Series A no. 176 B;Jaloud v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 47708\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 139 and 151 ECHR 2014;Kennedy v. the United Kingdom, no. 26839\/05, \u00a7 130, 18 May 2010;Klass and Others v. Germany, 6 September 1978, \u00a7\u00a7 55 and 56, Series A no. 28;Kruslin v. France, 24 April 1990, Series A no. 176 A;Leander v. Sweden, 26 March 1987, Series A no. 116;Liberty and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 58243\/00, 1 July 2008;Malone v. the United Kingdom, 2 August 1984, Series A no. 82;Nordisk Film & TV A\/S v. Denmark (dec.), no. 40485\/02, ECHR 2005 XIII;Roemen and Schmit v. Luxembourg, no. 51772\/99, \u00a7\u00a7 46 and 57, ECHR 2003 IV;Roman Zakharov v. Russia [GC], no. 47143\/06, ECHR 2015;Rotaru v. Romania [GC], no. 28341\/95, ECHR 2000 V;S. and Marper v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 30562\/04 and 30566\/04, ECHR 2008;S.M. v. Croatia [GC], no. 60561\/14, \u00a7 216, 25 June 2020;Sanoma Uitgevers B.V. v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 38224\/03, 14 September 2010;Segerstedt-Wiberg and Others v. Sweden, no. 62332\/00, \u00a7 120, ECHR 2006 VII;Szab\u00f3 and Vissy v. Hungary, no. 37138\/14, 12 January 2016;Valenzuela Contreras v. Spain, 30 July 1998, \u00a7 46, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 V;Voskuil v. the Netherlands, no. 64752\/01, \u00a7 65, 22 November 2007;Weber and Saravia v. Germany (dec.), no. 54934\/00, ECHR 2006\u2011XI;Wieser and Bicos Beteiligungen GmbH v. Austria, no. 74336\/01, \u00a7\u00a7 62-66, ECHR 2007 XI", "external_sources": "Report of the European Commission for Democracy through Law (the \u201cVenice Commission\u201d) on the Democratic Oversight of Signals Intelligence Agencies (2015);Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Security Act (\u201cFISA\u201d)\n", "conclusion": "Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Victim;Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression-{general} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression);Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression-{general} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression);No violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression-{general} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Ale\u0161 Pejchal;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Armen Harutyunyan;Carlo Ranzoni;Jon Fridrik Kj\u00f8lbro;Kristina Pardalos;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Marko Bo\u0161njak;M\u0101rti\u0146\u0161 Mits;Paul Lemmens;Pauliine Koskelo;Paulo Pinto De Albuquerque;Robert Spano;Vincent A. De Gaetano;Yonko Grozev;Gabriele Kucsko-Stadlmayer;Ksenija Turkovi\u0107;Tim Eicke", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0525JUD005817013" }, "66": { "webcast_id": "5817013_10072019", "hearing_date": "2019-07-10 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Big Brother Watch and Others v. the United Kingdom (nos. 58170\/13, 62322\/14 and 24960\/15)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "62322\/14", "case_id": "001-186048", "case_name": "CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-186048", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2018-09-13 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 3, "court": "4", "issue": "Chapter 12 and paragraphs 4.1-4.8, 6.22-6.24, 6.7, 7.2, 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, 7.6, 7.7, 7.8, 7.9, 7.15, 7.16, 7.17, 7.18 and 12.5 of the Interception of Communications Code of Practice (\u201cIC Code Practice\u201d) ; Chapter II and sections 5(3), 5(6), 8(1), 8(4), 9, 15, 15(2), 15(3), 15(4), 16, 16(2)(a), 16(2)(b), 16(3), 20, 22 and 81 of RIPA ; Paragraphs 2.24-2.27, 3.76 and 3.78-3.84 of the ACD Code ; Article 77-1-1 of the Criminal Procedure Code ; Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (\u201cPACE\u201d) ; Part 1 of Schedule 1 to the Data Protection Act 1998 ; Terrorism Act 2000 ; Section 19(2), (3), (4) and (5) of the Counter-Terrorism Act 2008 ; Investigatory Powers Act 2016 ; British-US Communication Intelligence Agreement of 5 March 1946 ; Security Services Act 1989 (\u201cSSA\u201d) ; Intelligence Services Act 1994 (\u201cISA\u201d) ; Section 1(1) of the Official Secrets Act 1989 (\u201cOSA\u201d)", "represented_by": "CAREY D. ; CURLING R. ; NORTON E.", "respondent": "GBR", "articles": "8;8-1;8-2;10;10-1;10-2;35;35-3-a", "strasbourg_caselaw": "A. and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 3455\/05, \u00a7 181, ECHR 2009;A. v. the Netherlands, no. 4900\/06, \u00a7 143, 20 July 2010;Akdivar and Others v. Turkey, 16 September 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 IV;Al-Skeini and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 55721\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 130-139, ECHR 2011;Anthony France and Others v. the United Kingdom (dec.), nos. 25357\/16, 25514\/16, 25552\/16 and 25597\/16, 26 September 2016;Association for European Integration and Human Rights and Ekimdzhiev v. Bulgaria, no. 62540\/00, 28 June 2007;Axel Springer AG v. Germany [GC], no. 39954\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 85-88, 7 February 2012;Ben Faiza v. France, no. 31446\/12, 8 February 2018;Bosphorus Hava Yollar\u0131 Turizm ve Ticaret Anonim \u015eirketi v. Ireland [GC], no. 45036\/98, \u00a7 165 ECHR 2005 VI;Burden v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 13378\/05, \u00a7 43, ECHR 2008;Chahal v. the United Kingdom, 15 November 1996, \u00a7 79, Reports 1996 V;Charron and Merle Montet v. France (dec), no. 22612\/15, \u00a7 30, 16 January 2018;Courtney v. Ireland (dec), no. 69558\/10, 18 December 2012;Demopoulos and Others v. Turkey (dec.) [GC], nos. 46113\/99, 3843\/02, 13751\/02, 13466\/03, 10200\/04, 14163\/04, 19993\/04 and 21819\/04, ECHR 2010;Goodwin v. the United Kingdom, 27 March 1996, Reports 1996 II;Gough v. the United Kingdom, no. 49327\/11, \u00a7 140, 28 October 2014;Heglas v. the Czech Republic, no. 5935\/02, \u00a7 74, 1 March 2007;Huvig v. France, 24 April 1990, Series A no. 176 B;Ireland v. the United Kingdom, 18 January 1978, Series A no. 25;Jaloud v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 47708\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 139 and 151 ECHR 2014;Klass and Others v. Germany, 6 September 1978, Series A no. 28;Kokkinakis v. Greece, 25 May 1993, \u00a7 40, Series A no. 260 A;Lawless v. Ireland (no. 3), 1 July 1961, \u00a7\u00a7 28\u201330, Series A no. 3;Leander v. Sweden, 26 March 1987, Series A no. 116;Liberty and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 58243\/00, 1 July 2008;Magee v. the United Kingdom, no. 28135\/95, \u00a7 50, ECHR 2000 VI;Malone v. the United Kingdom, 2 August 1984, Series A no. 82;McFarlane v. Ireland [GC], no. 31333\/06, \u00a7 107, 10 September 2010;MGN Limited v. the United Kingdom, no. 39401\/04, \u00a7\u00a7 140-155, 18 January 2011;Mustafa Sezgin Tanr\u0131kulu v. Turkey, no. 27473\/06, 18 July 2017;\u00d6calan v. Turkey [GC], no. 46221\/99, \u00a7 179, ECHR 2005 IV;Othman (Abu Qatada) v. United Kingdom, no. 8139\/09, \u00a7 183, ECHR 2012;Palomo S\u00e1nchez and Others v. Spain [GC], nos. 28955\/06, 28957\/06, 28959\/06 and 28964\/06, \u00a7 57, 12 September 2011;R.E. v. the United Kingdom, no. 62498\/11, 27 October 2015;Roemen and Schmit v. Luxembourg, no. 51772\/99, ECHR 2003-IV;Roman Zakharov v. Russia [GC], no. 47143\/06, ECHR 2015;Rotaru v. Romania [GC], no. 28341\/95, ECHR 2000 V;S. and Marper v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 30562\/04 and 30566\/04, ECHR 2008;Sanoma Uitgevers B.V. v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 38224\/03, 14 September 2010;Scoppola v. Italy (no. 2) [GC], no. 10249\/03, \u00a7 70, 17 September 2009;Sejdovic v. Italy [GC], no. 56581\/00, \u00a7 46, ECHR 2006 II;Szab\u00f3 and Vissy v. Hungary, no. 37138\/14, 12 January 2016;Trabelsi v. Belgium, no. 140\/10, \u00a7 117, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Uzun v. Germany, no. 35623\/05, ECHR 2010 (extracts);Valenzuela Contreras v. Spain, 30 July 1998, Reports 1998 V;Voskuil v. the Netherlands, no. 64752\/01, \u00a7 65, 22 November 2007;Vu\u010dkovi\u0107 and Others v. Serbia (preliminary objection) [GC], nos. 17153\/11 and 29 others, 25 March 2014;Weber and Saravia v. Germany (dec.), no. 54934\/00, ECHR 2006\u2011XI", "external_sources": "2015 Report of the European Commission for Democracy through Law (\u201cVenice Commission\u201d) on the Democratic Oversight of Signals Intelligence Agencies;2016 annual report of the Interception of Communications Commissioner", "conclusion": "Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression-{general} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Ale\u0161 Pejchal;Armen Harutyunyan;Kristina Pardalos;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Pauliine Koskelo;Ksenija Turkovi\u0107;Tim Eicke", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0913JUD005817013" }, "67": { "webcast_id": "5817013_10072019", "hearing_date": "2019-07-10 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Big Brother Watch and Others v. the United Kingdom (nos. 58170\/13, 62322\/14 and 24960\/15)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "62322\/14", "case_id": "001-150946", "case_name": "BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIVE JOURNALISM AND ALICE ROSS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-150946", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "LEIGH DAY & CO", "respondent": "GBR", "articles": "8;8-1;10;10-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Communicated", "separate_opinion": "", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "68": { "webcast_id": "5817013_10072019", "hearing_date": "2019-07-10 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Big Brother Watch and Others v. the United Kingdom (nos. 58170\/13, 62322\/14 and 24960\/15)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "24960\/15", "case_id": "001-210077", "case_name": "CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-210077", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2021-05-25 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 (\u201cRIPA\u201d) ; Interception of Communications Code of Practice (the \u201cIC Code\u201d)\n", "represented_by": "CAREY D. ; CURLING R. ; NORTON E.", "respondent": "GBR", "articles": "8;8-1;8-2;10;10-1;10-2;34", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Al-Skeini and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 55721\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 130-139, ECHR 2011;Amann v. Switzerland [GC], no. 27798\/95, \u00a7 69, ECHR 2000 II;Association for European Integration and Human Rights and Ekimdzhiev v. Bulgaria, no. 62540\/00, \u00a7 75, 28 June 2007;Centrum f\u00f6r r\u00e4ttvisa v. Sweden, no. 35252\/08, 19 June 2018;Goodwin v. the United Kingdom, no. 17488\/90, \u00a7 39, 27 March 1996;Heglas v. the Czech Republic, no. 5935\/02, \u00a7 74, 1 March 2007;Huvig v. France, 24 April 1990, Series A no. 176 B;Jaloud v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 47708\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 139 and 151 ECHR 2014;Kennedy v. the United Kingdom, no. 26839\/05, \u00a7 130, 18 May 2010;Klass and Others v. Germany, 6 September 1978, \u00a7\u00a7 55 and 56, Series A no. 28;Kruslin v. France, 24 April 1990, Series A no. 176 A;Leander v. Sweden, 26 March 1987, Series A no. 116;Liberty and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 58243\/00, 1 July 2008;Malone v. the United Kingdom, 2 August 1984, Series A no. 82;Nordisk Film & TV A\/S v. Denmark (dec.), no. 40485\/02, ECHR 2005 XIII;Roemen and Schmit v. Luxembourg, no. 51772\/99, \u00a7\u00a7 46 and 57, ECHR 2003 IV;Roman Zakharov v. Russia [GC], no. 47143\/06, ECHR 2015;Rotaru v. Romania [GC], no. 28341\/95, ECHR 2000 V;S. and Marper v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 30562\/04 and 30566\/04, ECHR 2008;S.M. v. Croatia [GC], no. 60561\/14, \u00a7 216, 25 June 2020;Sanoma Uitgevers B.V. v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 38224\/03, 14 September 2010;Segerstedt-Wiberg and Others v. Sweden, no. 62332\/00, \u00a7 120, ECHR 2006 VII;Szab\u00f3 and Vissy v. Hungary, no. 37138\/14, 12 January 2016;Valenzuela Contreras v. Spain, 30 July 1998, \u00a7 46, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 V;Voskuil v. the Netherlands, no. 64752\/01, \u00a7 65, 22 November 2007;Weber and Saravia v. Germany (dec.), no. 54934\/00, ECHR 2006\u2011XI;Wieser and Bicos Beteiligungen GmbH v. Austria, no. 74336\/01, \u00a7\u00a7 62-66, ECHR 2007 XI", "external_sources": "Report of the European Commission for Democracy through Law (the \u201cVenice Commission\u201d) on the Democratic Oversight of Signals Intelligence Agencies (2015);Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Security Act (\u201cFISA\u201d)\n", "conclusion": "Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Victim;Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression-{general} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression);Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression-{general} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression);No violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression-{general} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Ale\u0161 Pejchal;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Armen Harutyunyan;Carlo Ranzoni;Jon Fridrik Kj\u00f8lbro;Kristina Pardalos;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Marko Bo\u0161njak;M\u0101rti\u0146\u0161 Mits;Paul Lemmens;Pauliine Koskelo;Paulo Pinto De Albuquerque;Robert Spano;Vincent A. De Gaetano;Yonko Grozev;Gabriele Kucsko-Stadlmayer;Ksenija Turkovi\u0107;Tim Eicke", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0525JUD005817013" }, "69": { "webcast_id": "5817013_10072019", "hearing_date": "2019-07-10 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Big Brother Watch and Others v. the United Kingdom (nos. 58170\/13, 62322\/14 and 24960\/15)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "24960\/15", "case_id": "001-186048", "case_name": "CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-186048", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2018-09-13 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 3, "court": "4", "issue": "Chapter 12 and paragraphs 4.1-4.8, 6.22-6.24, 6.7, 7.2, 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, 7.6, 7.7, 7.8, 7.9, 7.15, 7.16, 7.17, 7.18 and 12.5 of the Interception of Communications Code of Practice (\u201cIC Code Practice\u201d) ; Chapter II and sections 5(3), 5(6), 8(1), 8(4), 9, 15, 15(2), 15(3), 15(4), 16, 16(2)(a), 16(2)(b), 16(3), 20, 22 and 81 of RIPA ; Paragraphs 2.24-2.27, 3.76 and 3.78-3.84 of the ACD Code ; Article 77-1-1 of the Criminal Procedure Code ; Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (\u201cPACE\u201d) ; Part 1 of Schedule 1 to the Data Protection Act 1998 ; Terrorism Act 2000 ; Section 19(2), (3), (4) and (5) of the Counter-Terrorism Act 2008 ; Investigatory Powers Act 2016 ; British-US Communication Intelligence Agreement of 5 March 1946 ; Security Services Act 1989 (\u201cSSA\u201d) ; Intelligence Services Act 1994 (\u201cISA\u201d) ; Section 1(1) of the Official Secrets Act 1989 (\u201cOSA\u201d)", "represented_by": "CAREY D. ; CURLING R. ; NORTON E.", "respondent": "GBR", "articles": "8;8-1;8-2;10;10-1;10-2;35;35-3-a", "strasbourg_caselaw": "A. and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 3455\/05, \u00a7 181, ECHR 2009;A. v. the Netherlands, no. 4900\/06, \u00a7 143, 20 July 2010;Akdivar and Others v. Turkey, 16 September 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 IV;Al-Skeini and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 55721\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 130-139, ECHR 2011;Anthony France and Others v. the United Kingdom (dec.), nos. 25357\/16, 25514\/16, 25552\/16 and 25597\/16, 26 September 2016;Association for European Integration and Human Rights and Ekimdzhiev v. Bulgaria, no. 62540\/00, 28 June 2007;Axel Springer AG v. Germany [GC], no. 39954\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 85-88, 7 February 2012;Ben Faiza v. France, no. 31446\/12, 8 February 2018;Bosphorus Hava Yollar\u0131 Turizm ve Ticaret Anonim \u015eirketi v. Ireland [GC], no. 45036\/98, \u00a7 165 ECHR 2005 VI;Burden v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 13378\/05, \u00a7 43, ECHR 2008;Chahal v. the United Kingdom, 15 November 1996, \u00a7 79, Reports 1996 V;Charron and Merle Montet v. France (dec), no. 22612\/15, \u00a7 30, 16 January 2018;Courtney v. Ireland (dec), no. 69558\/10, 18 December 2012;Demopoulos and Others v. Turkey (dec.) [GC], nos. 46113\/99, 3843\/02, 13751\/02, 13466\/03, 10200\/04, 14163\/04, 19993\/04 and 21819\/04, ECHR 2010;Goodwin v. the United Kingdom, 27 March 1996, Reports 1996 II;Gough v. the United Kingdom, no. 49327\/11, \u00a7 140, 28 October 2014;Heglas v. the Czech Republic, no. 5935\/02, \u00a7 74, 1 March 2007;Huvig v. France, 24 April 1990, Series A no. 176 B;Ireland v. the United Kingdom, 18 January 1978, Series A no. 25;Jaloud v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 47708\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 139 and 151 ECHR 2014;Klass and Others v. Germany, 6 September 1978, Series A no. 28;Kokkinakis v. Greece, 25 May 1993, \u00a7 40, Series A no. 260 A;Lawless v. Ireland (no. 3), 1 July 1961, \u00a7\u00a7 28\u201330, Series A no. 3;Leander v. Sweden, 26 March 1987, Series A no. 116;Liberty and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 58243\/00, 1 July 2008;Magee v. the United Kingdom, no. 28135\/95, \u00a7 50, ECHR 2000 VI;Malone v. the United Kingdom, 2 August 1984, Series A no. 82;McFarlane v. Ireland [GC], no. 31333\/06, \u00a7 107, 10 September 2010;MGN Limited v. the United Kingdom, no. 39401\/04, \u00a7\u00a7 140-155, 18 January 2011;Mustafa Sezgin Tanr\u0131kulu v. Turkey, no. 27473\/06, 18 July 2017;\u00d6calan v. Turkey [GC], no. 46221\/99, \u00a7 179, ECHR 2005 IV;Othman (Abu Qatada) v. United Kingdom, no. 8139\/09, \u00a7 183, ECHR 2012;Palomo S\u00e1nchez and Others v. Spain [GC], nos. 28955\/06, 28957\/06, 28959\/06 and 28964\/06, \u00a7 57, 12 September 2011;R.E. v. the United Kingdom, no. 62498\/11, 27 October 2015;Roemen and Schmit v. Luxembourg, no. 51772\/99, ECHR 2003-IV;Roman Zakharov v. Russia [GC], no. 47143\/06, ECHR 2015;Rotaru v. Romania [GC], no. 28341\/95, ECHR 2000 V;S. and Marper v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 30562\/04 and 30566\/04, ECHR 2008;Sanoma Uitgevers B.V. v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 38224\/03, 14 September 2010;Scoppola v. Italy (no. 2) [GC], no. 10249\/03, \u00a7 70, 17 September 2009;Sejdovic v. Italy [GC], no. 56581\/00, \u00a7 46, ECHR 2006 II;Szab\u00f3 and Vissy v. Hungary, no. 37138\/14, 12 January 2016;Trabelsi v. Belgium, no. 140\/10, \u00a7 117, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Uzun v. Germany, no. 35623\/05, ECHR 2010 (extracts);Valenzuela Contreras v. Spain, 30 July 1998, Reports 1998 V;Voskuil v. the Netherlands, no. 64752\/01, \u00a7 65, 22 November 2007;Vu\u010dkovi\u0107 and Others v. Serbia (preliminary objection) [GC], nos. 17153\/11 and 29 others, 25 March 2014;Weber and Saravia v. Germany (dec.), no. 54934\/00, ECHR 2006\u2011XI", "external_sources": "2015 Report of the European Commission for Democracy through Law (\u201cVenice Commission\u201d) on the Democratic Oversight of Signals Intelligence Agencies;2016 annual report of the Interception of Communications Commissioner", "conclusion": "Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression-{general} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Ale\u0161 Pejchal;Armen Harutyunyan;Kristina Pardalos;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Pauliine Koskelo;Ksenija Turkovi\u0107;Tim Eicke", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0913JUD005817013" }, "70": { "webcast_id": "5817013_10072019", "hearing_date": "2019-07-10 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Big Brother Watch and Others v. the United Kingdom (nos. 58170\/13, 62322\/14 and 24960\/15)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "24960\/15", "case_id": "001-159526", "case_name": "10 HUMAN RIGHTS ORGANISATIONS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-159526", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "WELSH J. ; WILLIAMS N. ; SCOTT M. ", "respondent": "GBR", "articles": "6;6-1;8;8-1;10;10-2;14", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Communicated", "separate_opinion": "", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "71": { "webcast_id": "3525208_10072019", "hearing_date": "2019-07-10 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Centrum f\u00f6r r\u00e4ttvisa v. Sweden (no. 35252\/08)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "35252\/08", "case_id": "001-210078", "case_name": "CASE OF CENTRUM F\u00d6R R\u00c4TTVISA v. SWEDEN", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-210078", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2021-05-25 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Foreign Intelligence Act and Ordinance ; Signals Intelligence Act and Ordinance ; Foreign Intelligence Court Act ; FRA Personal Data Processing Act and Ordinance ; Foreign Intelligence Inspectorate Instructions Ordinance ; Parliamentary Ombudsmen Instructions Act ; Chancellor of Justice Supervision Act\n", "represented_by": "BERMAN F. ; EVANS A.", "respondent": "SWE", "articles": "8;8-1;8-2;34", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Amann v. Switzerland [GC], no. 27798\/95, \u00a7 69, ECHR 2000 II;Association for European Integration and Human Rights and Ekimdzhiev v. Bulgaria, no. 62540\/00, 28 June 2007;Big Brother Watch and Others v. the United Kingdom, nos. 58170\/13 and 2 others, 13 September 2018;Heglas v. the Czech Republic, no. 5935\/02, 1 March 2007;Huvig v. France, 24 April 1990, Series A no. 176 B;Kennedy v. the United Kingdom, no. 26839\/05, 18 May 2010;Klass and Others v. Germany, 6 September 1978, Series A no. 28;Leander v. Sweden, 26 March 1987, Series A no. 116;Liberty and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 58243\/00, 1 July 2008;Malone v. the United Kingdom, 2 August 1984, Series A no. 82;Roman Zakharov v. Russia [GC], no. 47143\/06, ECHR 2015;Rotaru v. Romania [GC], no. 28341\/95, ECHR 2000-V;S. and Marper v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 30562\/04 and 30566\/04, ECHR 2008;Segerstedt-Wiberg and Others v. Sweden, no. 62332\/00, \u00a7 120, ECHR 2006-VII;Valenzuela Contreras v. Spain, 30 July 1998, \u00a7 46, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 V;Weber and Saravia v. Germany (dec.), no. 54934\/00, ECHR 2006 XI", "external_sources": "Report of the European Commission for Democracy through Law (the \u201cVenice Commission\u201d) on the Democratic Oversight of Signals Intelligence Agencies (2015)", "conclusion": "Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Victim;Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Alena Pol\u00e1\u010dkov\u00e1;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Branko Lubarda;Carlo Ranzoni;Georgios A. Serghides;Helen Keller;Helena J\u00e4derblom;Jon Fridrik Kj\u00f8lbro;Marko Bo\u0161njak;M\u0101rti\u0146\u0161 Mits;Paul Lemmens;Paulo Pinto De Albuquerque;Robert Spano;Vincent A. De Gaetano;Yonko Grozev;Gabriele Kucsko-Stadlmayer;Pere Pastor Vilanova;Tim Eicke", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0525JUD003525208" }, "72": { "webcast_id": "3525208_10072019", "hearing_date": "2019-07-10 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Centrum f\u00f6r r\u00e4ttvisa v. Sweden (no. 35252\/08)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "35252\/08", "case_id": "001-183863", "case_name": "CASE OF CENTRUM F\u00d6R R\u00c4TTVISA v. SWEDEN", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-183863", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2018-06-19 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 3, "court": "6", "issue": "Signals Intelligence Act (2008) ; Foreign Intelligence Act (2000) ; Public Access to Information and Secrecy Act (2009) ; FRA Personal Data Processing Act (2007)", "represented_by": "BERGMAN F.", "respondent": "SWE", "articles": "8;8-1;8-2;34", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Association for European Integration and Human Rights and Ekimdzhiev v. Bulgaria, no. 62540\/00, 28 June 2007;Iordachi and Others v. Moldova, no. 25198\/02, 10 February 2009;Kennedy v. the United Kingdom, no. 26839\/05, 18 May 2010;Klass and Others v. Germany, 6 September 1978, Series A no. 28;Liberty and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 58243\/00, 1 July 2008;Roman Zakharov v. Russia [GC], no. 47143\/06, ECHR 2015;Szab\u00f3 and Vissy v. Hungary, no. 37138\/14, 12 January 2016;Weber and Saravia v. Germany (dec.), no. 54934\/00, ECHR 2006-XI", "external_sources": "Report of the European Commission for Democracy through Law (\u201cVenice Commission\u201d) on the Democratic Oversight of Signals Intelligence Agencies (December 2015)", "conclusion": "Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Victim;No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for correspondence)", "separate_opinion": "FALSE", "judges": "Alena Pol\u00e1\u010dkov\u00e1;Branko Lubarda;Georgios A. Serghides;Helen Keller;Helena J\u00e4derblom;Pere Pastor Vilanova", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0619JUD003525208" }, "73": { "webcast_id": "3525208_10072019", "hearing_date": "2019-07-10 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Centrum f\u00f6r r\u00e4ttvisa v. Sweden (no. 35252\/08)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "35252\/08", "case_id": "001-147946", "case_name": "CENTRUM F\u00d6R R\u00c4TTVISA v. SWEDEN", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-147946", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "", "respondent": "SWE", "articles": "8;8-1;13", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "", "separate_opinion": "", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "74": { "webcast_id": "6056114_15052019", "hearing_date": "2019-05-15 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "S.M. v. Croatia (no. 60561\/14)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "60561\/14", "case_id": "001-203503", "case_name": "CASE OF S.M. v. CROATIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-203503", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2020-06-25 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "", "represented_by": "BEZBRADICA JELAVI\u0106 S.", "respondent": "HRV", "articles": "4;4-1;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Abdurakhmanova and Abdulgamidova v. Russia, no. 41437\/10, \u00a7 76, 22 September 2015;Akta\u015f v. Turkey, no. 24351\/94, \u00a7 271, ECHR 2003 V (extracts);Alpar v. Turkey, no. 22643\/07, \u00a7 42, 26 January 2016;Armani da Silva v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 5878\/08, \u00a7 233 in fine, 30 March 2016;Asllani v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, no. 24058\/13, \u00a7 62 in fine, 10 December 2015;Beganovi\u0107 v. Croatia, no. 46423\/06, \u00a7 68, 25 June 2009;Bouyid v. Belgium [GC], no. 23380\/09, ECHR 2015;Brecknell v. the United Kingdom, no. 32457\/04, \u00a7 66, 27 November 2007;C.N. and V. v. France, no. 67724\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 55 and 69, 11 October 2012;C.N. v. the United Kingdom, no. 4239\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 47-52 and 80, 13 November 2012;Chowdury and Others v. Greece, no. 21884\/15, 30 March 2017;Demir and Baykara v. Turkey [GC], no. 34503\/97, \u00a7 67, ECHR 2008;Denis Vasilyev v. Russia, no. 32704\/04, \u00a7 100, 17 December 2009;Dimitar Shopov v. Bulgaria, no. 17253\/07, \u00a7 48, 16 April 2013;G\u00fczelyurtlu and Others v. Cyprus and Turkey [GC], no. 36925\/07, \u00a7 234, 29 January 2019;Hassan v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 29750\/09, \u00a7 62, ECHR 2014;Hentschel and Stark v. Germany, no. 47274\/15, \u00a7 94, 9 November 2017;Hovhannisyan v. Armenia, no. 18419\/13, \u00a7 55, 19 July 2018;Ilias and Ahmed v. Hungary [GC], no. 47287\/15, \u00a7 177, 21 November 2019;J. and Others v. Austria, no. 58216\/12, 17 January 2017;Jeronovi\u010ds v. Latvia [GC], no. 44898\/10, \u00a7 103, 5 July 2016;Khamtokhu and Aksenchik v. Russia [GC], nos. 60367\/08 and 961\/11, \u00a7 73, 24 January 2017;L.E. v. Greece, no. 71545\/12, \u00a7\u00a7 58 and 68, 21 January 2016;M. and Others v. Italy and Bulgaria, no. 40020\/03, \u00a7\u00a7 106 and 157-158, 31 July 2012;M.G.C. v. Romania, no. 61495\/11, \u00a7\u00a7 60-61, 15 March 2016;Makaratzis v. Greece [GC], no. 50385\/99, \u00a7 77, ECHR 2004 XI;Merabishvili v. Georgia [GC], no. 72508\/13, \u00a7\u00a7 371-372, 28 November 2017;Mihhailov v. Estonia, no. 64418\/10, \u00a7 126, 30 August 2016;Milena Felicia Dumitrescu v. Romania, no. 28440\/07, \u00a7 52, 24 March 2015;Mocanu and Others v. Romania [GC], nos. 10865\/09 and 2 others, \u00a7 314, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Molla Sali v. Greece [GC], no. 20452\/14, \u00a7 85, 19 December 2018;Mur\u0161i\u0107 v. Croatia [GC], no. 7334\/13, \u00a7 69, 20 October 2016;Mustafa Tun\u00e7 and Fecire Tun\u00e7 v. Turkey [GC], no. 24014\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 173 and 176, 14 April 2015;Nachova and Others v. Bulgaria [GC], nos. 43577\/98 and 43579\/98, \u00a7 113, ECHR 2005 VII;Navalnyy v. Russia [GC], nos. 29580\/12 and 4 others, \u00a7\u00a7 58 and 65, 15 November 2018;Nicolae Virgiliu T\u0103nase v. Romania [GC], no. 41720\/13, \u00a7 171, 25 June 2019;Radomilja and Others v. Croatia [GC], nos. 37685\/10 and 22768\/12, \u00a7\u00a7 121-122 and 126, 20 March 2018;Rantsev v. Cyprus and Russia, no. 25965\/04, ECHR 2010 (extracts);Sarbyanova-Pashaliyska and Pashaliyska v. Bulgaria, no. 3524\/14, \u00a7 37, 12 January 2017;Schatschaschwili v. Germany [GC], no. 9154\/10, \u00a7\u00a7 101 and 103-104, ECHR 2015;Siliadin v. France, no. 73316\/01, \u00a7\u00a7 115-117, ECHR 2005 VII;S\u00f6derman v. Sweden [GC], no. 5786\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 90-91, ECHR 2013;Stummer v. Austria [GC], no. 37452\/02, \u00a7 117, ECHR 2011;Tsalikidis and Others v. Greece, no. 73974\/14, \u00a7 86, 16 November 2017;V.T. v. France, no. 37194\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 26 and 35, 11 September 2007;Van der Mussele v. Belgium, 23 November 1983, \u00a7\u00a7 34-37, Series A no. 70;Y. v. Slovenia, no. 41107\/10, \u00a7 96, ECHR 2015 (extracts);Zubac v. Croatia [GC], no. 40160\/12, \u00a7\u00a7 52-55, 5 April 2018", "external_sources": "1927 Convention to Suppress the Slave Trade and Slavery;1956 Convention to Suppress the Slave Trade and Slavery;1930 Forced Labour Convention (Convention No. 29) of the International Labour Organisation (ILO);Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons, Especially Women and Children (Palermo Protocol);Convention on Action against Trafficking in Human Beings (Anti Trafficking Convention) entered into force on 1 February 2008 and ratified by Croatia on 5 September 2007;The United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime (\u201cUNCTOC\u201d), signed on 12-15 December 2000 and entered into force on 29 September 2003", "conclusion": "Violation of Article 4 - Prohibition of slavery and forced labour (Article 4 - Positive obligations;Effective investigation;Article 4-1 - Trafficking in human beings);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Andr\u00e1s Saj\u00f3;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Armen Harutyunyan;Branko Lubarda;Carlo Ranzoni;Egidijus K\u016bris;Georgios A. Serghides;Iulia Motoc;Jon Fridrik Kj\u00f8lbro;Julia Laffranque;Kristina Pardalos;Krzysztof Wojtyczek;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Pauliine Koskelo;Paulo Pinto De Albuquerque;Robert Spano;S\u00edofra O'Leary;Vincent A. De Gaetano;Georges Ravarani;Ksenija Turkovi\u0107;Pere Pastor Vilanova;Mar\u00eda El\u00f3segui", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0625JUD006056114" }, "75": { "webcast_id": "6056114_15052019", "hearing_date": "2019-05-15 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "S.M. v. Croatia (no. 60561\/14)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "60561\/14", "case_id": "001-184665", "case_name": "CASE OF S.M. v. CROATIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-184665", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2018-07-19 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 3, "court": "4", "issue": "Articles 106, 157, 175 and 195 of the Criminal Code ; Articles 2, 9, 16, 38, 43, 45, 47, 438 and 449 of the Code of Criminal Procedure\n", "represented_by": "BEZBRADICA JELAVIC S.", "respondent": "HRV", "articles": "4;4-1;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Ali and Ay\u015fe Duran v. Turkey, no 42942\/02, 8 April 2008;Ba\u015ft\u00fcrk v. Turkey, no. 49742\/09, \u00a7 26, 28 April 2015;Beganovi\u0107 v. Croatia, no. 46423\/06, \u00a7 77, 25 June 2009;C.N. and V. v. France, no. 67724\/09, \u00a7 105, 11 October 2012;C.N. v. the United Kingdom, no. 4239\/08, 13 November 2012;Chowdury and Others v. Greece, no. 21884\/15, ECHR 2017;J. and Others v. Austria, no. 58216\/12, \u00a7 104, ECHR 2017 (extracts);L.E. v. Greece, no. 71545\/12, 21 January 2016;M.C. v. Bulgaria, no. 39272\/98, \u00a7 150, ECHR 2003 XII;Okkal\u0131 v. Turkey, no. 52067\/99, \u00a7 66, ECHR 2006 XII (extracts);Rantsev v. Cyprus and Russia, no. 25965\/04, ECHR 2010 (extracts);Siliadin v. France, no. 73316\/01, ECHR 2005 VII;X and Y v. the Netherlands, 26 March 1985, \u00a7 27, Series A no 91", "external_sources": "Convention for the Suppression of the Traffic in Persons and the Exploitation of the Prostitution of Others, adopted on 2 December 1949, entered into force on 25 July 1951 and ratified by Croatia on 12 October 1992;Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (\u201cthe CEDAW\u201d) adopted in 1979 by the UN General Assembly and ratified by Croatia on 9 September 1992;Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons, especially Women and Children (\u201cthe Palermo Protocol\u201d), supplementing the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organised Crime 2000, signed by Croatia on 12 December 2000 and ratified on 24 January 2003;Declaration on the Elimination of Violence against Women, adopted at the United Nations General Assembly plenary meeting on 20 December 1993;Council of Europe Convention on Action against Trafficking in Human Beings, adopted on 16 May 2005, entered into force on 1 February 2008 and ratified by Croatia on 5 September 2007", "conclusion": "Violation of Article 4 - Prohibition of slavery and forced labour (Article 4 - Positive obligations;Effective investigation;Article 4-1 - Trafficking in human beings);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Armen Harutyunyan;Kristina Pardalos;Krzysztof Wojtyczek;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Pauliine Koskelo;Ksenija Turkovi\u0107", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0719JUD006056114" }, "76": { "webcast_id": "6056114_15052019", "hearing_date": "2019-05-15 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "S.M. v. Croatia (no. 60561\/14)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "60561\/14", "case_id": "001-152795", "case_name": "S.M. v. CROATIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-152795", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "BEZBRADICA JELAVIC S.", "respondent": "HRV", "articles": "3;4;4-1;8;8-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Communicated", "separate_opinion": "", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "77": { "webcast_id": "1214818_22012019", "hearing_date": "2019-01-22 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "A.M. v. France (no. 12148\/18)", "hearing_type": "Chamber hearing", "appno": "12148\/18", "case_id": "001-192958", "case_name": "CASE OF A.M. v. FRANCE", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-192958", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2019-04-29 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 3, "court": "23", "issue": "", "represented_by": "LANTHEAUME Y.", "respondent": "FRA", "articles": "3;35;35-1;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Akdivar and Others v. Turkey, 16 September 1996, \u00a7 69, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 IV;Azzolina and Others v. Italy, nos. 28923\/09 and 67599\/10, \u00a7 105, 26 October 2017;Bahaddar v. the Netherlands, 19 February 1998, \u00a7\u00a7 47-48, Reports 1998 I;Baumann v. France, no 33592\/96, \u00a7 47, ECHR 2001 V (extracts);Chahal v. the United Kingdom, 15 November 1996, Reports 1996-V, p. 1855, \u00a7 79;Daoudi v. France, no 19576\/08, 3 December 2009;F.G. v. Sweden [GC], no 43611\/11, \u00a7\u00a7 111-118, 23 March 2016;Gebremedhin [Gaberamadhien] v. France, no 25389\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 64-66, ECHR 2007 II;J.K. and Others v. Sweden [GC], no 59166\/12, 23 August 2016;Karoussiotis v. Portugal, no 23205\/08, \u00a7 57, ECHR 2011 (extracts);Kuric and Others v. Slovenia [GC], no 26828\/06, \u00a7 286, 26 June 2012;M.A. v. France, no 9373\/15, 1 February 2018;M.X. v. France (no 21580\/10, \u00a7 37, 1 July 2014;Micallef v. Malta [GC], no 17056\/06, \u00a7 55, ECHR 2009;NA. v. the United Kingdom, no 25904\/07, \u00a7 90, 17 July 2008;Nada v. Switzerland [GC], no 10593\/08, \u00a7 142, ECHR 2012;Rafaa v. France, no 25393\/10, \u00a7 33, 30 May 2013;Raninen v. Finland, 16 December 1997, \u00a7 41, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-VIII;Ringeisen v. Austria, 16 July 1971, \u00a7 89, Series A no 13;Saadi v. Italy [GC], no 37201\/06, \u00a7 128, ECHR 2008;Sahin Alpay v. Turkey, no 16538\/17, \u00a7 86, 20 March 2018;Selmouni v. France [GC], no 25803\/94, \u00a7 95, ECHR 1999-V;Stanka Mirkovic and Others v. Montenegro, nos. 33781\/15 and 3 others, \u00a7 48, 7 March 2017;Trabelsi v. Belgium, no 140\/10, \u00a7 89, ECHR 2014 (extracts);X v. the Netherlands, no 14319\/17, \u00a7 72, 10 July 2018;Y.P. and L.P. v. France, no 32476\/06, \u00a7 53, 2 September 2010", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Expulsion) (Conditional) (Algeria)", "separate_opinion": "FALSE", "judges": "", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0429JUD001214818" }, "78": { "webcast_id": "187413_28112018", "hearing_date": "2018-11-28 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "L\u00f3pez Ribalda and Others v. Spain (no. 1874\/13)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "1874\/13", "case_id": "001-197098", "case_name": "CASE OF L\u00d3PEZ RIBALDA AND OTHERS v. SPAIN", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-197098", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2019-10-17 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Section 5 of the Personal Data Protection Act ; Instruction no. 1\/2006 of 8 November 2006 ; Article 20.3 of the Labour Regulations (Estatuto de los Trabajadores) approved by Royal Legislative Decree no. 1\/1995\n\n", "represented_by": "GONZALES ESPADA J.A.", "respondent": "ESP", "articles": "6;6-1;8;8-1;35;35-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Allan v. the United Kingdom, no 48539\/99, \u00a7 35, ECHR 2002 IX;Angelov v. Bulgaria, no 44076\/98, \u00a7 28, 22 April 2004;Antovi\u0107 and Mirkovi\u0107 v. Montenegro, no 70838\/13, \u00a7\u00a7 42-45, 28 November 2017;B\u0103rbulescu v. Romania [GC], no 61496\/08, 5 September 2017;Bochan v. Ukraine (no 2) [GC], no 22251\/08, \u00a7 61, ECHR 2015;Carmel Saliba v. Malta, no 24221\/13, \u00a7 67, 29 November 2016;De La Flor Cabrera v. Spain, no 10764\/09, \u00a7 31, 27 May 2014;Denisov v. Ukraine [GC], no 76639\/11, \u00a7\u00a7 95 and 100, 25 September 2018;Fern\u00e1ndez Mart\u00ednez v. Spain [GC], no 56030\/07, \u00a7 110, ECHR 2014 (extracts);G\u00e4fgen v. Germany [GC], no 22978\/05, \u00a7 163, ECHR 2010;Herbecq and the Association \"Ligue des droits de l\u2019homme\" v. Belgium, nos. 32200\/96 and 32201\/96, decision of the Commission of 14 January 1998, Decisions and Reports 92-A, p. 92;Ilnseher v. Germany [GC], nos. 10211\/12 and 27505\/14, \u00a7 100, 4 December 2018;K. and T. v. Finland [GC], no 25702\/94, \u00a7\u00a7 140-141, ECHR 2001 VII;K\u00f6pke v. Germany (dec.), no 420\/07, 5 October 2010;M.C. v. Bulgaria, no 39272\/98, \u00a7 150, ECHR 2003 XII;Malhous v. the Czech Republic (dec.) [GC], no 33071\/96, ECHR 2000-XII;Navalnyy v. Russia [GC], nos. 29580\/12 and 4 others, \u00a7 61, 15 November 2018;Nicola v. Turkey, no 18404\/91, \u00a7 15, 27 January 2009;P.G. and J.H. v. the United Kingdom, no 44787\/98, ECHR 2001 IX;Palomo S\u00e1nchez and Others v. Spain [GC], nos. 28955\/06 and 3 others, \u00a7 62, ECHR 2011;Peck v. the United Kingdom, no 44647\/98, \u00a7\u00a7 58-63, ECHR 2003 I;Perry v. the United Kingdom, no 63737\/00, \u00a7\u00a7 36-43, ECHR 2003 IX (extracts);Reklos and Davourlis v. Greece, no 1234\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 34-43, 15 January 2009;Schenk v. Switzerland, 12 July 1988, \u00a7\u00a7 46-48, Series A no 140;Sch\u00fcssel v. Austria (dec.), no 42409\/98, 21 February 2002;Sch\u00fcth v. Germany, no 1620\/03, \u00a7\u00a7 54 and 57, ECHR 2010;S\u00f6derman v. Sweden [GC], no 5786\/08, \u00a7 78, ECHR 2013;Von Hannover v. Germany (no 2) [GC], nos. 40660\/08 and 60641\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 95 and 98, ECHR 2012;Vukota-Boji\u0107 v. Switzerland, no 61838\/10, \u00a7\u00a7 55-59, 18 October 2016;X and Y v. the Netherlands, 26 March 1985, \u00a7\u00a7 23, 24 and 27, Series A no 91", "external_sources": "Council of Europe Convention for the Protection of Individuals with regard to Automatic Processing of Personal Data", "conclusion": "Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Positive obligations;Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing);No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Alena Pol\u00e1\u010dkov\u00e1;Ale\u0161 Pejchal;Andr\u00e9 Potocki;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Dmitry Dedov;Ganna Yudkivska;Georgios A. Serghides;Guido Raimondi;Helena J\u00e4derblom;Jon Fridrik Kj\u00f8lbro;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Luis L\u00f3pez Guerra;M\u0101rti\u0146\u0161 Mits;Robert Spano;Vincent A. De Gaetano;Yonko Grozev;Gabriele Kucsko-Stadlmayer;Ksenija Turkovi\u0107;Pere Pastor Vilanova;Mar\u00eda El\u00f3segui", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1017JUD000187413" }, "79": { "webcast_id": "187413_28112018", "hearing_date": "2018-11-28 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "L\u00f3pez Ribalda and Others v. Spain (no. 1874\/13)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "1874\/13", "case_id": "001-179881", "case_name": "CASE OF L\u00d3PEZ RIBALDA AND OTHERS v. SPAIN", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-179881", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2018-01-09 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 3, "court": "6", "issue": "Article 20.3 of the Labour Regulations (Estatuto de los Trabadores) approved by Royal Legislative Decree no. 1\/1995 ; Section 5 of the Data Protection Act ; Article 3 of Instruction no. 1\/2006 issued by the Spanish Data Protection Agency\n", "represented_by": "GONZALEZ ESPADA J.A.", "respondent": "ESP", "articles": "6;6-1;8;8-1;35;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Allan v. the United Kingdom, no. 48539\/99, \u00a7\u00a7 42 and 43, 5 November 2002;B\u0103rbulescu v. Romania [GC], no. 61496\/08, ECHR 2017 (extracts);Benediktsd\u00f3ttir v. Iceland (dec.), no. 38079\/06, 16 June 2009;Bykov v. Russia [GC], no. 4378\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 88-98, 10 March 2009;Garc\u00eda Ruiz v. Spain [GC], no. 30544\/96, \u00a7 28, ECHR 1999 I;Halford v. the United Kingdom, 25 June 1997, \u00a7 45, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997 III;I. v. Finland, no. 20511\/03, \u00a7\u00a7 35-36, 17 July 2008;J.H. v. the United Kingdom, no. 48839\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 77-79, 20 December 2011;K.U. v. Finland, no. 2872\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 42-43, ECHR 2008;Kemmache v. France (no. 3), 24 November 1994, \u00a7 44, Series A no. 296 C;Khan v. the United Kingdom, no. 35394\/97, \u00a7 34, ECHR 2000 V;P.G. and J.H. v. the United Kingdom, no. 44787\/98, ECHR 2001 IX;Peck v. the United Kingdom, no. 44647\/98, \u00a7\u00a7 58-59, ECHR 2003 I;Perry v. the United Kingdom, no. 63737\/00, \u00a7\u00a7 36-38, ECHR 2003 IX (extracts);Reklos and Davourlis v. Greece, no. 1234\/05, \u00a7 40, 15 January 2009;Rotaru v. Romania [GC], no. 28341\/95, \u00a7\u00a7 43-44, ECHR 2000 V;Schenk v. Switzerland, 12 July 1988, Series A no. 140, p. 29, \u00a7\u00a7 45-48;Sch\u00fcssel v. Austria (dec.), no. 42409\/98, 21 February 2002;S\u00f6derman v. Sweden [GC], no. 5786\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 78-79, ECHR 2013;Van Mechelen and Others v. the Netherlands, 23 April 1997, \u00a7 50, Reports 1997 III;Von Hannover v. Germany, no. 59320\/00, \u00a7 50, ECHR 2004 VI", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Positive obligations;Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing);No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Alena Pol\u00e1\u010dkov\u00e1;Dmitry Dedov;Georgios A. Serghides;Helena J\u00e4derblom;Luis L\u00f3pez Guerra;Pere Pastor Vilanova", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0109JUD000187413" }, "80": { "webcast_id": "187413_28112018", "hearing_date": "2018-11-28 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "L\u00f3pez Ribalda and Others v. Spain (no. 1874\/13)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "1874\/13", "case_id": "001-152959", "case_name": "L\u00d3PEZ RIBALDA v. SPAIN and 1 other application", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-152959", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "GONZALEZ ESPADA, J.A.", "respondent": "ESP", "articles": "6;6-1;8;8-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Communicated", "separate_opinion": "", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "81": { "webcast_id": "20117_21112018", "hearing_date": "2018-11-21 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Magyar K\u00e9tfark\u00fa Kutya P\u00e1rt v. Hungary (no. 201\/17)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "201\/17", "case_id": "001-200657", "case_name": "CASE OF MAGYAR K\u00c9TFARK\u00da KUTYA P\u00c1RT v. HUNGARY", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-200657", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2020-01-20 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Section 2(1), 2(1)a, 2(1)(e), 141, 218 and 218(2)(d) of the Act XXXVI of 2013 on Electoral Procedure (EPA) ; Article 2(1) of the Fundamental Law\n\n", "represented_by": "TORDAI Cs.", "respondent": "HUN", "articles": "10;10-1;10-2;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Ahmet Y\u0131ld\u0131r\u0131m v. Turkey, no. 3111\/10, \u00a7\u00a7 49-50, ECHR 2012;Association Ekin v. France, no. 39288\/98, \u00a7 46, ECHR 2001-VIII;B\u00e9dat v. Switzerland [GC], no. 56925\/08, \u00a7 58, 29 March 2016;Cengiz and Others v. Turkey, nos. 48226\/10 and 14027\/11, \u00a7 54, ECHR 2015 (extracts);Centro Europa 7 S.r.l. and Di Stefano v. Italy [GC], no. 38433\/09, \u00a7 141, ECHR 2012;Delfi AS v. Estonia [GC], no. 64569\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 120-122, ECHR 2015;G\u00e4fgen v. Germany [GC], no. 22978\/05, \u00a7 144, ECHR 2010;Gillow v. the United Kingdom, 24 November 1986, \u00a7 51, Series A no. 109;Gorzelik and Others v. Poland [GC], no. 44158\/98, \u00a7 65, ECHR 2004 I;Ivinovi\u0107 v. Croatia, no. 13006\/13, \u00a7 28, 18 September 2014;Jalloh v. Germany (dec.), no. 54810\/00, 26 October 2004;Jersild v. Denmark, 23 September 1994, \u00a7 31, Series A no. 298;Kovach v. Ukraine, no. 39424\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 48-62, ECHR 2008;Kudrevi\u010dius and Others v. Lithuania [GC], no. 37553\/05, \u00a7 115, ECHR 2015;Lykourezos v. Greece, no. 33554\/03, \u00a7\u00a7 50-58, ECHR 2006 VIII;Magyar Helsinki Bizotts\u00e1g v. Hungary [GC], no. 18030\/11, 8 November 2016;Malone v. the United Kingdom, 2 August 1984, \u00a7 67, Series A no. 82;McFarlane v. Ireland [GC], no. 31333\/06, \u00a7 107, 10 September 2010;Neij and Sunde Kolmisoppi v. Sweden (dec.), no. 40397\/12, 19 February 2013;O\u2019Keeffe v. Ireland [GC], no. 35810\/09, \u00a7 199, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Olsson v. Sweden (no. 1), 24 March 1988, \u00a7 61, Series A no. 130;Orlovskaya Iskra v. Russia, no. 42911\/08, \u00a7 110, 21 February 2017;\u00d6zt\u00fcrk v. Turkey [GC], no. 22479\/93, \u00a7 49, ECHR 1999 VI;Parrillo v. Italy [GC], no. 46470\/11, \u00a7 87, ECHR 2015;Paschalidis, Koutmeridis and Zaharakis v. Greece, nos. 27863\/05 and 2 others, \u00a7\u00a7 29-35, 10 April 2008;Perin\u00e7ek v. Switzerland [GC], no. 27510\/08, \u00a7 136, ECHR 2015 (extracts);Refah Partisi (the Welfare Party) and Others v. Turkey [GC], nos. 41340\/98 and 3 others, \u00a7\u00a7 87-88 and 100, ECHR 2003 II;Schwarzenberger v. Germany, no. 75737\/01, \u00a7 31, 10 August 2006;Storck v. Germany (dec.), no. 61603\/00, 26 October 2004;T\u00e1rsas\u00e1g a Szabads\u00e1gjogok\u00e9rt v. Hungary, no. 37374\/05, 14 April 2009;Uhl v. Germany (dec.), no. 64387\/01, 6 May 2004;Von Hannover v. Germany (no. 2) [GC], nos. 40660\/08 and 60641\/08, \u00a7 103, ECHR 2012;Vu\u010dkovi\u0107 and Others v. Serbia (preliminary objection) [GC], nos. 17153\/11 and 29 others, \u00a7\u00a7 69-77, 25 March 2014", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression-{general} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression;Freedom to impart information;Freedom to receive ideas);Pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Alena Pol\u00e1\u010dkov\u00e1;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Branko Lubarda;Carlo Ranzoni;Dmitry Dedov;Ganna Yudkivska;Guido Raimondi;Jon Fridrik Kj\u00f8lbro;Ledi Bianku;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Marko Bo\u0161njak;Paul Lemmens;Paulo Pinto De Albuquerque;Robert Spano;S\u00edofra O'Leary;St\u00e9phanie Mourou-Vikstr\u00f6m;Vincent A. De Gaetano;Gabriele Kucsko-Stadlmayer", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0120JUD000020117" }, "82": { "webcast_id": "20117_21112018", "hearing_date": "2018-11-21 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Magyar K\u00e9tfark\u00fa Kutya P\u00e1rt v. Hungary (no. 201\/17)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "201\/17", "case_id": "001-180310", "case_name": "CASE OF MAGYAR K\u00c9TFARK\u00da KUTYA P\u00c1RT v. HUNGARY", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-180310", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2018-01-23 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 3, "court": "7", "issue": "Article IX (1) of the Fundamental Law ; Section 2(1), (a) and (e) of Act XXXVI of 2013 on Electoral Procedure\n", "represented_by": "TORDAI Cs.", "respondent": "HUN", "articles": "10;10-1;10-2;35;35-1;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Chiragov and Others v. Armenia [GC], no. 13216\/05, \u00a7 116, ECHR 2015;D\u017eini\u0107 v. Croatia, no. 38359\/13, \u00a7 49, 17 May 2016;Erm\u00e9nyi v. Hungary, no. 22254\/14, \u00a7 38, 22 November 2016;Guseva v. Bulgaria, no. 6987\/07, \u00a7 36, 17 February 2015;Neij and Sunde Kolmisoppi v. Sweden (dec.), no. 40397\/12, 20 June 2012;Observer and Guardian v. the United Kingdom, 26 November 1991, \u00a7 59(b), Series A no. 216;\u00d6zt\u00fcrk v. Turkey [GC], no. 22479\/93, \u00a7 49, ECHR 1999-VI;Paradiso and Campanelli v. Italy [GC], no. 25358\/12, \u00a7 169, ECHR 2017;S.A.S. v. France [GC], no. 43835\/11, \u00a7\u00a7 113-114, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Stankov and the United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden v. Bulgaria, nos. 29221\/95 and 29225\/95, \u00a7 84, ECHR 2001 IX;Von Hannover v. Germany (no. 2) [GC], nos. 40660\/08 and 60641\/08, \u00a7 103, ECHR 2012", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression-{general} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression;Freedom to impart information;Freedom to receive information);Pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "FALSE", "judges": "Carlo Ranzoni;Ganna Yudkivska;Marko Bo\u0161njak;Paulo Pinto De Albuquerque;Vincent A. De Gaetano", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0123JUD000020117" }, "83": { "webcast_id": "20117_21112018", "hearing_date": "2018-11-21 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Magyar K\u00e9tfark\u00fa Kutya P\u00e1rt v. Hungary (no. 201\/17)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "201\/17", "case_id": "001-170894", "case_name": "MAGYAR K\u00c9TFARK\u00da KUTYA P\u00c1RT v. HUNGARY", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-170894", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "", "respondent": "HUN", "articles": "10;10-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Communicated", "separate_opinion": "", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "84": { "webcast_id": "3728313_17102018", "hearing_date": "2018-10-17 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Strand Lobben and Others v. Norway (no. 37283\/13)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "37283\/13", "case_id": "001-195909", "case_name": "CASE OF STRAND LOBBEN AND OTHERS v. NORWAY", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-195909", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2019-09-10 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Sections 4-21 and 4-20 of the Child Welfare Act", "represented_by": "THUAN DIT DIEUDONN\u00c9 G.", "respondent": "NOR", "articles": "8;8-1;8-2;35;35-3-a;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "A, B and C v. Ireland [GC], no. 25579\/05, \u00a7 281, ECHR 2010;A.K. and L. v. Croatia, no. 37956\/11, 8 January 2013;Aune v. Norway, no. 52502\/07, \u00a7 66, 28 October 2010;Elsholz v. Germany [GC], no. 25735\/94, ECHR 2000-VIII;Gnahor\u00e9 v. France, no. 40031\/98, \u00a7 59, ECHR 2000 IX;Iatridis v. Greece (just satisfaction) [GC], no. 31107\/96, \u00a7 55, ECHR 2000 XI;Ilnseher v. Germany [GC], nos. 10211\/12 and 27505\/14, \u00a7 100, 4 December 2018;Johansen v. Norway, no. 17383\/90, \u00a7 78, 7 August 1996;Jovanovic v. Sweden, no. 10592\/12, 22 October 2015;K. and T. v. Finland [GC], no. 25702\/94, ECHR 2001 VII;Kru\u0161ki\u0107 v. Croatia (dec.), no. 10140\/13, \u00a7\u00a7 101-02, 25 November 2014;Kutzner v. Germany, no. 46544\/99, \u00a7 75, ECHR 2002 I;Lambert and Others v. France [GC], no. 46043\/14, \u00a7 94, ECHR 2015 (extracts);Mar\u0161\u00e1lek v. the Czech Republic, no. 8153\/04, \u00a7 71, 4 April 2006;Mohamed Hasan v. Norway, no. 27496\/15, \u00a7 151, 26 April 2018;Neulinger and Shuruk v. Switzerland [GC], no. 41615\/07, ECHR 2010;Olsson v. Sweden (no. 1), 24 March 1988, Series A no. 130;Paradiso and Campanelli v. Italy [GC], no. 25358\/12, \u00a7 179, 24 January 2017;Pontes v. Portugal, no. 19554\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 92 and 99, 10 April 2012;R. and H. v. the United Kingdom, no. 35348\/06, \u00a7 88, 31 May 2011;R.M.S. v. Spain, no. 28775\/12, \u00a7 86, 18 June 2013;S.H. v. Italy, no. 52557\/14, \u00a7 42, 13 October 2015;Scozzari and Giunta v. Italy [GC], nos. 39221\/98 and 41963\/98, \u00a7 138, ECHR 2000 VIII;Sommerfeld v. Germany [GC], no. 31871\/96, ECHR 2003 VIII (extracts);T.P. and K.M. v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 28945\/95, \u00a7 72, ECHR 2001 V (extracts);Vidal v. Belgium, 22 April 1992, \u00a7 33, Series A no. 235 B;W. v. the United Kingdom, 8 July 1987, \u00a7\u00a7 63-65, Series A no. 121;Y.C. v. the United Kingdom, no. 4547\/10, \u00a7 138, 13 March 2012", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione personae;Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for family life);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": null, "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0910JUD003728313" }, "85": { "webcast_id": "3728313_17102018", "hearing_date": "2018-10-17 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Strand Lobben and Others v. Norway (no. 37283\/13)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "37283\/13", "case_id": "001-178877", "case_name": "CASE OF STRAND LOBBEN AND OTHERS v. NORWAY", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-178877", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2017-11-30 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 3, "court": "23", "issue": "Sections 4-12, 4-20, 4-20a and 4-21 of the Child Welfare Act of 17 July 1992", "represented_by": "REIKERAS M.", "respondent": "NOR", "articles": "8;8-1;8-2;34;35;35-1;35-3-a", "strasbourg_caselaw": "A.K. and L. v. Croatia, no. 37956\/11, \u00a7 48, 8 January 2013;Aune v. Norway, no. 52502\/07, 28 October 2010;Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin C\u00e2mpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848\/08, \u00a7 96, ECHR 2014;Fressoz and Roire v. France [GC], no. 29183\/95, \u00a7 37, ECHR 1999 I;Giunta v. Italy, [GC], nos. 39221\/98 and 41963\/98, \u00a7\u00a7 138-139, ECHR 2000 VIII;Gnahor\u00e9 v. France, no. 40031\/98, ECHR 2000 IX;G\u00f6rg\u00fcl\u00fc v. Germany, no. 74969\/01, \u00a7 48, 26 February 2004;Johansen v. Norway (dec.), 12750\/02, 10 October 2002;Jovanovic v. Sweden, no. 10592\/12, \u00a7 77, 22 October 2015;K. and T. v. Finland [GC], no. 25702\/94, ECHR 2001 VII;Kaburov v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 9035\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 52-53, 19 June 2012;Kru\u0161ki\u0107 v. Croatia (dec.), no. 10140\/13, 25 November 2014;Kutzner v. Germany, no. 46544\/99, ECHR 2002 I;Lawlor v. the United Kingdom, no. 12763\/87, Commission decision of 14 July 1988, Decisions and Reports (DR) 57, p. 216;Micallef v. Malta [GC], no. 17056\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 48-49, ECHR 2009;Moustaquim v. Belgium, no. 12313\/86, \u00a7 36, 18 February 1991;Neulinger and Shuruk v. Switzerland [GC], no. 41615\/07, ECHR 2010;N\u00f6lkenbockhoff v. Germany, 25 August 1987, \u00a7 33, Series A no. 123;Paradiso and Campanelli v. Italy [GC], no. 25358\/12, 24 January 2017;Price v. the United Kingdom, no. 12402\/86, Commission decision of 9 March 1988, DR 55, p. 224;R. and H. v. the United Kingdom, no. 35348\/06, \u00a7 88, 31 May 2011;Scozzari and Giunta v. Italy, [GC], nos. 39221\/98 and 41963\/98, ECHR 2000 VIII;T.S. and J.J. v. Norway (dec.), no. 15633\/15, 11 October 2016;Wagner and J.M.W.L. v. Luxembourg, no. 76240\/01, \u00a7 118, 28 June 2007;Y.C. v. the United Kingdom, no. 4547\/10, 13 March 2012;Znamenskaya v. Russia, no. 77785\/01, \u00a7 27, 2 June 2005", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione personae;No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for family life)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Andr\u00e9 Potocki;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Erik M\u00f8se;S\u00edofra O'Leary;Yonko Grozev;Gabriele Kucsko-Stadlmayer", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1130JUD003728313" }, "86": { "webcast_id": "3728313_17102018", "hearing_date": "2018-10-17 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Strand Lobben and Others v. Norway (no. 37283\/13)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "37283\/13", "case_id": "001-159658", "case_name": "STRAND LOBBEN AND OTHERS v. NORWAY", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-159658", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "REIKERAS M.", "respondent": "NOR", "articles": "8;8-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Communicated", "separate_opinion": "", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "87": { "webcast_id": "5401210_03102018", "hearing_date": "2018-10-03 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Mihalache v. Romania (no. 54012\/10) ", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "54012\/10", "case_id": "001-194523", "case_name": "CASE OF MIHALACHE v. ROMANIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-194523", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2019-07-08 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Article 18 of the Criminal Code (as in force in August 2008) ; Articles 10 and 11 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (as in force in August 2008) ; Article 87 \u00a7 5 of Government Emergency Ordinance no. 195\/2002 on road traffic \n", "represented_by": "BRATU M.", "respondent": "ROU", "articles": "41;P7-4", "strasbourg_caselaw": "A and B v. Norway [GC], nos. 24130\/11 and 29758\/11, 15 November 2016;Allen v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 25424\/09, \u00a7 127, ECHR 2013;Artico v. Italy, 13 May 1980, \u00a7 33, Series A no. 37;Bernh Larsen Holding AS and Others v. Norway, no. 24117\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 123-24 and 134, 14 March 2013;Bratyakin v. Russia (dec.), no. 72776\/01, 9 March 2006;Bujni\u0163a v. Moldova, no. 36492\/02, \u00a7 23, 16 January 2007;Bulgakova v. Russia, no. 69524\/01, \u00a7 39, 18 January 2007;Centro Europa 7 S.r.l. and Di Stefano v. Italy [GC], no. 38433\/09, \u00a7 143, ECHR 2012;Engel and Others v. the Netherlands, 8 June 1976, \u00a7\u00a7 81-82, Series A no. 22;Escoubet v. Belgium [GC], no. 26780\/95, ECHR 1999 VII;Ezeh and Connors v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 39665\/98 and 40086\/98, \u00a7 104, ECHR 2003-X;Fadin v. Russia, no. 58079\/00, \u00a7 32, 27 July 2006;Gacon v. France, no. 1092\/04, \u00a7 34 in fine, 22 May 2008;Golder v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1975, \u00a7 29, Series A no. 18;Goncharovy v. Russia, no. 77989\/01, 27 November 2008;Grande Stevens and Others v. Italy, nos. 18640\/10 and 4 others, \u00a7 244, 4 March 2014;Grecu v. Romania, no. 75101\/01, \u00a7 54, 30 November 2006;Harutyunyan v. Armenia (dec.), no. 34334\/04, 7 December 2006;Hilda Hafsteinsd\u00f3ttir v. Iceland, no. 40905\/98, \u00a7 51, 8 June 2004;Horciag v. Romania (dec.), no. 70982\/01, 15 March 2005;Ioan Pop v. Romania (dec.), no. 40301\/04, \u00a7 25, 28 June 2011;J\u00f3hannesson and Others v. Iceland, no. 22007\/11, \u00a7\u00a7 48-49 and 61, 18 May 2017;Johnston and Others v. Ireland, 18 December 1986, \u00a7 51, Series A no. 112;Kadu\u0161i\u0107 v. Switzerland, no. 43977\/13, \u00a7\u00a7 82 and 84, 9 January 2018;Kar\u00e1csony and Others v. Hungary [GC], nos. 42461\/13 and 44357\/13, \u00a7 179, 17 May 2016;Klass and Others v. Germany, 6 September 1978, \u00a7 68, Series A no. 28;Kud\u0142a v. Poland [GC], no. 30210\/96, \u00a7 152, ECHR 2000-XI;Leki\u0107 v. Slovenia [GC], no. 36480\/07, \u00a7 95, 11 December 2018;Lopes de Sousa Fernandes v. Portugal [GC], no. 56080\/13, \u00a7 245, 19 December 2017;Maaouia v. France [GC], no. 39652\/98, \u00a7 36, ECHR 2000-X;Magyar Helsinki Bizotts\u00e1g v. Hungary [GC], no. 18030\/11, \u00a7\u00a7 118 and 120, 8 November 2016;Margu\u0161 v. Croatia [GC], no. 4455\/10, \u00a7\u00a7 114 and 120, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Mulot v. France (dec.), no. 37211\/97, 14 December 1999;Nagmetov v. Russia [GC], no. 35589\/08, \u00a7 62, 30 March 2017;Navalnyy v. Russia [GC], nos. 29580\/12 and 4 others, \u00a7\u00a7 114 15 and 118, 15 November 2018;Nikitin v. Russia, no. 50178\/99, \u00a7\u00a7 35-39, ECHR 2004-VIII;\u00d6zt\u00fcrk v. Germany, 21 February 1984, \u00a7 49, Series A no. 73;Ramda v. France, no. 78477\/11, \u00a7 81, 19 December 2017;Ramos Nunes de Carvalho e S\u00e1 v. Portugal [GC], nos. 55391\/13 and 2 others, \u00a7 122, 6 November 2018;Rohlena v. the Czech Republic [GC], no. 59552\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 50 and 64, ECHR 2015;Roman Zakharov v. Russia [GC], no. 47143\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 228-229, ECHR 2015;Rotaru v. Romania [GC], no. 28341\/95, \u00a7\u00a7 52-56, ECHR 2000 V;S., V. and A. v. Denmark [GC], nos. 35553\/12 and 2 others, \u00a7 74, 22 October 2018;Sancakl\u0131 v. Turkey, no. 1385\/07, \u00a7 30, 15 May 2018;Savinskiy v. Ukraine, no. 6965\/02, \u00a7 25, 28 February 2006;Schatschaschwili v. Germany [GC], no. 9154\/10, \u00a7 167, ECHR 2015;Sergey Zolotukhin v. Russia [GC], no. 14939\/03, ECHR 2009;\u0160imkus v. Lithuania, no. 41788\/11, \u00a7 47, 13 June 2017;Sismanidis and Sitaridis v. Greece, nos. 66602\/09 and 71879\/12, \u00a7 42, 9 June 2016;Smirnova and Smirnova v. Russia (dec.), nos. 46133\/99 and 48183\/99, 3 October 2002;Soering v. the United Kingdom, 7 July 1989, \u00a7 87, Series A no. 161;Stec and Others v. the United Kingdom (dec.) [GC], nos. 65731\/01 and 65900\/01, \u00a7\u00a7 47-48, ECHR 2005 X;Stoianova and Nedelcu v. Romania, nos. 77517\/01 and 77722\/01, ECHR 2005 VIII;Storbr\u00e5ten, (dec.), no. 12277\/04, 1 February 2007;Sundqvist v. Finland (dec.), no. 75602\/01, 22 November 2005;Tomasovi\u0107 v. Croatia, no. 53785\/09, \u00a7 23, 18 October 2011;Tsonyo Tsonev v. Bulgaria (no. 2), no. 2376\/03, \u00a7 54, 14 January 2010;Vedernikova v. Russia, no. 25580\/02, \u00a7 30, 12 July 2007", "external_sources": "Explanatory Report on Protocol No. 7 to the Convention;Articles 31, 32 and 33 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969)\n", "conclusion": "Violation of Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 - Right not to be tried or punished twice-{general} (Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 - Reopening of case;Fundamental defect in proceedings;Conviction;Criminal offence);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Branko Lubarda;Egidijus K\u016bris;Ganna Yudkivska;Georgios A. Serghides;Guido Raimondi;Helen Keller;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Marko Bo\u0161njak;Paulo Pinto De Albuquerque;Robert Spano;St\u00e9phanie Mourou-Vikstr\u00f6m;Vincent A. De Gaetano;Georges Ravarani;Mar\u00eda El\u00f3segui", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0708JUD005401210" }, "88": { "webcast_id": "5401210_03102018", "hearing_date": "2018-10-03 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Mihalache v. Romania (no. 54012\/10) ", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "54012\/10", "case_id": "001-122640", "case_name": "MIHALACHE v. ROMANIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-122640", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "2013-06-19 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "BRATU M.", "respondent": "ROU", "articles": "P7-4", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "", "separate_opinion": "FALSE", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "89": { "webcast_id": "867515_26092018", "hearing_date": "2018-09-26 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "N.D. and N.T. v. Spain (no. 8675\/15)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "8675\/15", "case_id": "001-201353", "case_name": "CASE OF N.D. AND N.T. v. SPAIN", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-201353", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2020-02-13 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Institutional Law 4\/2000 of 11 January 2000 on the rights and freedoms of aliens in Spain and their social integration (\u201cthe LOEX\u201d) ; Law 12\/2009 of 30 October 2009 on asylum and subsidiary protection ; Royal Decree 203\/1995 of 10 February 1995 (implementing regulations for the Law on asylum) ; Royal Decree 557\/2011 of 20 April 2011 (implementing regulations for the LOEX) ; The Guardia Civil border control operations protocol of 26 February 2014 (as applicable at the relevant time), which introduced the term \u201coperational border\u201d ; Circular letter to all Spanish ambassadors of 20 November 2009 ; Annual report of the Spanish Ombudsperson of 2005 and 2013 ; Articles 2 and 6 from the European Union Treaty ; Articles 67, 72, 77, 78, and 79 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ; Articles 4, 18, 19 and 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union ; Agreement on the accession of the Kingdom of Spain to the Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement of 14 June 1985 on the gradual abolition of checks at their common borders [between the contracting parties] ; Regulation (EC) No 562\/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 establishing a Community Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code) ; Directive 2008\/115\/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on common standards and procedures in Member States for returning illegally staying third country nationals (\u201cthe Return Directive\u201d) ; Council Directive 2005\/85\/EC of 1 December 2005 on minimum standards on procedures in Member States for granting and withdrawing refugee status ; Directive 2011\/95\/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2011 on standards for the qualification of third-country nationals or stateless persons as beneficiaries of international protection, for a uniform status for refugees or for persons eligible for subsidiary protection, and for the content of the protection granted (recast) ; European Parliament resolution of 12 April 2016 on the situation in the Mediterranean and the need for a holistic EU approach to migration (2015\/2095(INI))", "represented_by": "GERICKE C. ; BOYE G.", "respondent": "ESP", "articles": "1;13;13+P4-4;34;35;35-1;35-3-a;37;37-1;37-1-b;37-1-c;P4-4", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Abdulaziz, Cabales and Balkandali v. the United Kingdom, 28 May 1985, \u00a7 67, Series A no. 94;Airey v. Ireland, 9 October 1979, \u00a7 24, Series A no. 32;Al Dulimi and Montana Management Inc. v. Switzerland [GC], no. 5809\/08, \u00a7 134, 21 June 2016;Al Skeini and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 55721\/07, \u00a7 141, ECHR 2011;Ali v. Switzerland, 5 August 1998, \u00a7\u00a7 30-33, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-V;Allen v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 25424\/09, \u00a7 95, ECHR 2013;Amuur v. France, 25 June 1996, \u00a7 43, Reports 1996 III;Andric v. Sweden (dec.), no. 45917\/99, 23 February 1999;Assanidze v. Georgia [GC], no. 71503\/01, ECHR 2004-II;Baka v. Hungary [GC], no. 20261\/12, \u00a7 149, 23 June 2016;Bankovi\u0107 and Others v. Belgium and Others (dec.), [GC], no. 52207\/99, ECHR 2001-XII;Berisha and Haljiti v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (dec.), no. 18670\/03, ECHR 2005-VIII (extracts);Boujlifa v. France, 21 October 1997, \u00a7 42, Reports 1997-VI;Cyprus v. Turkey (just satisfaction) [GC], no. 25781\/94, \u00a7 23, ECHR 2014;Davydov v. Estonia (dec.), no. 16387\/03, 31 May 2005;Del R\u00edo Prada v. Spain [GC], no. 42750\/09, \u00a7 81, ECHR 2013;Dritsas and Others v. Italy (dec.), no. 2344\/02, 1 February 2011;El Masri v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia [GC], no. 39630\/09;F.G. v. Sweden, [GC], no. 43611\/11, \u00a7\u00a7 81-82, ECHR 2016;Gebremedhin [Gaberamadhien] v. France, no. 25389\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 54-58, ECHR 2007 II;Georgia v. Russia (I) [GC], no. 13255\/07, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Ghulami v. France (dec.), no. 45302\/05, 7 April 2009;G\u00fczelyurtlu and Others v. Cyprus and Turkey [GC], no. 36925\/07, 29 January 2019;Hayd v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 30880\/10, 29 November 2011;Hirsi Jamaa and Others v. Italy [GC], no. 27765\/09, ECHR 2012;Ibrahim and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 50541\/08 and 3 others, \u00a7 272, 13 September 2016;Ila\u015fcu and Others v. Moldova and Russia [GC], no. 48787\/99, ECHR 2004 VII;Ilias and Ahmed v. Hungary [GC], no. 47287\/15, \u00a7\u00a7 123-28, 21 November 2019;J.K. and Others v. Sweden, no. 59166\/12, \u00a7\u00a7 78 and 79, 4 June 2015;Kadzoev v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 56437\/07, \u00a7 7, 1 October 2013;Kebe and Others v. Ukraine, no. 12552\/12, \u00a7 87, 12 January 2017;Khlaifia and Others v. Italy [GC], no. 16483\/12, 15 December 2016;Leyla \u015eahin v. Turkey [GC], no. 44774\/98, \u00a7 136, ECHR 2005 XI;Loizidou v. Turkey (preliminary objections), 23 March 1995, \u00a7 75, Series A no. 310;M.A. and Others v. Lithuania, no. 59793\/17, 11 December 2018;M.A. v. Cyprus, no. 41872\/10, ECHR 2013 (extracts);M.H. v. Cyprus (dec.), no. 41744\/10, \u00a7 14, 14 January 2014;M.Is. v. Cyprus (dec.), no. 41805\/10, \u00a7 20, 10 February 2015;M.S.S. v. Belgium and Greece [GC], no. 30696\/09, ECHR 201;Matthews v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 24833\/94, ECHR 1999-I;Micallef v. Malta [GC], no. 17056\/06, \u00a7 48, ECHR 2009;N. v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 26565\/05, \u00a7 30, ECHR 2008;Paposhvili v. Belgium, [GC], no. 41738\/10, 13 December 2016;Ramzy v. the Netherlands (striking out), no. 25424\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 64-66, 20 July 2010;Saadi v. Italy [GC], no. 37201\/06, ECHR 2008;Sharifi and Others v. Italy and Greece, no. 16643\/09, 21 October 2014;Soering v. the United Kingdom, 7 July 1989, \u00a7 86, Series A no. 161;Sultani v. France, no. 45223\/05, ECHR 2007-IV (extracts);United Communist Party of Turkey and Others v. Turkey, 30 January 1998, \u00a7 29, Reports 1998-I", "external_sources": "Guidelines of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on Forced Return, adopted on 4 May 2005;Report of the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) on their visit to Spain in July 2014 (published on 9 April 2015);The 2015 annual activity report by the Commissioner for Human Rights of the Council of Europe;Report of the fact-finding mission by the Special Representative of the Secretary General of the Council of Europe on migration and refugees, to Spain, March 2018 (SG\/Inf(2018)25);Resolution 2299 (2019) of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe on the pushback policies and practice in Council of Europe member States;Charter of the United Nations (UN Charter), signed on 26 June 1945 in San Francisco;Articles 27, 31 and 32 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties of 23 May 1969;Geneva Convention of 28 July 1951 relating to the Status of Refugees;Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment of 10 December 1984 (UNCAT);Declaration on Territorial Asylum adopted by the United Nations General Assembly on 14 December 1967 (Resolution 2312 (XXII));Draft Articles on the Expulsion of Aliens adopted by the International Law Commission at their sixty-sixth session (2014) of which the United Nations General Assembly took note (Resolution A\/RES\/69\/119 of 10 December 2014);Second report on the expulsion of aliens, dated 20 July 2006 (Document A\/CN.4\/573), by Mr Maurice Kamto, Special Rapporteur;Conclusions on International Protection adopted by the Executive Committee of the UNHCR Programme 1975 \u2013 2017;Views adopted by the Committee on the Rights of the Child on 12 February 2019 under the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on a communications procedure, concerning communication No. 4\/2016", "conclusion": "Preliminary objection dismissed (Article 34 - Victim);Preliminary objection dismissed (Article 35-1 - Exhaustion of domestic remedies);Preliminary objection dismissed (Article 37-1 - Respect for human rights;Article 37-1-b - Matter resolved;Article 37-1-c - Continued examination not justified);Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Article 35-3-a - Ratione materiae);No violation of Article 4 of Protocol No. 4 - Prohibition of collective expulsion of aliens-{general} (Article 4 of Protocol No. 4 - Prohibition of collective expulsion of aliens);No violation of Article 13+P4-4 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 4 of Protocol No. 4 - Prohibition of collective expulsion of aliens-{general};Prohibition of collective expulsion of aliens)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Alena Pol\u00e1\u010dkov\u00e1;Ale\u0161 Pejchal;Andr\u00e9 Potocki;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Armen Harutyunyan;Branko Lubarda;Dmitry Dedov;Ganna Yudkivska;Georgios A. Serghides;Helen Keller;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Luis L\u00f3pez Guerra;Marko Bo\u0161njak;M\u0101rti\u0146\u0161 Mits;Pauliine Koskelo;Robert Spano;Vincent A. De Gaetano;Gabriele Kucsko-Stadlmayer;Pere Pastor Vilanova;Mar\u00eda El\u00f3segui;Tim Eicke", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0213JUD000867515" }, "90": { "webcast_id": "867515_26092018", "hearing_date": "2018-09-26 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "N.D. and N.T. v. Spain (no. 8675\/15)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "8675\/15", "case_id": "001-177683", "case_name": "CASE OF N.D. AND N.T. v. SPAIN", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-177683", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2017-10-03 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 3, "court": "6", "issue": "", "represented_by": "GERICKE C. ; BOYE TUSET G.", "respondent": "ESP", "articles": "1;13;13+P4-4;34;35;35-1;35-3-a;41;P4-4", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Al-Skeini and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 55721\/07, \u00a7 137, ECHR 2011;Assanidze v. Georgia [GC], no 71503\/01, \u00a7 139, ECHR 2004-II;Bankovi\u0107 and Others v. Belgium and Others (dec.) [GC], no 52207\/99, ECHR 2001-XII;Berdzenishvili and Others v. Russia, nos. 14594\/07 and 6 others, 20 December 2016;\u010conka v. Belgium, no 51564\/99, ECHR 2002 I;De Souza Ribeiro v. France [GC], no 22689\/07, \u00a7 83;Georgia v. Russia (I) (dec.), 13255\/07, 36 June 2009;Hasan v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 29750\/09, \u00a7 74, ECHR 2014;Hirsi Jamaa and Others v. Italy [GC], no 27765\/09, ECHR 2012;Ila\u015fcu and Others v. Moldova and Russia [GC], no 48787\/99, ECHR 2004 VII;Khlaifia and Others v. Italy [GC], no 16483\/12, ECHR 2016;Sharifi and Others v. Italy and Greece, no 16643\/09, 21 October 2014;Shioshvili and Others v. Russia, no 19356\/07, 20 December 2016", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Preliminary objection dismissed (Article 34 - Victim);Preliminary objection dismissed (Article 35-1 - Exhaustion of domestic remedies);Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Article 35-3-a - Ratione materiae);Violation of Article 4 of Protocol No. 4 - Prohibition of collective expulsion of aliens-{general} (Article 4 of Protocol No. 4 - Prohibition of collective expulsion of aliens);Violation of Article 13+P4-4 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 4 of Protocol No. 4 - Prohibition of collective expulsion of aliens-{general};Prohibition of collective expulsion of aliens);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Alena Pol\u00e1\u010dkov\u00e1;Branko Lubarda;Dmitry Dedov;Georgios A. Serghides;Helen Keller;Luis L\u00f3pez Guerra;Pere Pastor Vilanova", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1003JUD000867515" }, "91": { "webcast_id": "1805211_06062018", "hearing_date": "2018-06-06 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Rooman v. Belgium (no. 18052\/11)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "18052\/11", "case_id": "001-189902", "case_name": "CASE OF ROOMAN v. BELGIUM", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-189902", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2019-01-31 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Law of 5 May 2014 on compulsory confinement (in force since 1 October 2016), repealing the Social Protection Act of 9 April 1930", "represented_by": "HISSEL V. ; VERSIE B.", "respondent": "BEL", "articles": "3;5;5-1;5-1-e;34;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "A.S. v. Turkey, no 58271\/10, \u00a7 66, 13 September 2016;Aerts v. Belgium, 30 July 1998, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-V;Ashingdane v. the United Kingdom, no 8225\/78, report of the Commission of 12 May 1983;B. v. Germany, no 61272\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 82-84, 19 April 2012;Bergmann v. Germany, no 23279\/14, \u00a7\u00a7 124-128, 7 January 2016;Blokhin v. Russia [GC], no 47152\/06, \u00a7 137, 23 March 2016;Bouamar v. Belgium, 29 February 1988, \u00a7 50, Series A no 129;Bouyid v. Belgium [GC], no 23380\/09, \u00a7 81, ECHR 2015;Brand v. the Netherlands, no 49902\/99, \u00a7\u00a7 62-66, 11 May 2004;Caryn v. Belgium, no 43687\/09, \u00a7 52, 9 January 2014;Claes v. Belgium, no 43418\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 93 101, 10 January 2013;Cocaign v. France, no 32010\/07, 3 November 2011;De Schepper v. Belgium, no 27428\/07, \u00a7 48, 13 October 2009;Dhoest v. Belgium, no 10448\/83, report of the Commission of 14 May 1987, Decisions and Reports (DR);Enache v. Romania, no 10662\/06, \u00a7 49, 1 April 2014;Frank v. Germany (dec.), no 32705\/06, 28 September 2010;G\u00e4fgen v. Germany [GC], no 22978\/05, \u00a7 115, ECHR 2010;Garib v. the Netherlands [GC], no 43494\/09, \u00a7 100, 6 November 2017;Gelaude v. Belgium, no 43733\/09, 9 January 2014;Glien v. Germany, no 7345\/12, \u00a7\u00a7 93-96, 28 November 2013;G\u00fclay \u00c7etin v. Turkey, no 44084\/10, 5 March 2013;H.W. v. Germany, no 17167\/11, \u00a7 112, 19 September 2013;Had\u017eic and Suljic v. Bosnia and Herzegovina, nos. 39446\/06 and 33849\/08, \u00a7 41, 7 June 2011;Herczegfalvy v. Austria, 24 September 1992, \u00a7 82, Series A no 244;H\u00fcseyin Yildirim v. Turkey, no 2778\/02, \u00a7 73, 3 May 2007;Hutchison Reid v. the United Kingdom, no 50272\/99, \u00a7\u00a7 49-55, ECHR 2003-IV;Ilnseher v. Germany [GC], nos. 10211\/12 and 27505\/14, \u00a7\u00a7 139 and 141, 4 December 2018;Kadusic v. Switzerland, no 43977\/13, \u00a7\u00a7 56 and 59, 9 January 2018;Keenan v. the United Kingdom, no 27229\/95, \u00a7\u00a7 115-116, ECHR 2001 III;Klinkenbu\u00df v. Germany, no 53157\/11, \u00a7 47, 25 February 2016;Kudla v. Poland [GC], no 30210\/96, \u00a7\u00a7 82 100, ECHR 2000 XI;L.B. v. Belgium, no 22831\/08, 2 October 2012;Dufoort v. Belgium, no 43653\/09, 10 January 2013;Swennen v. Belgium, no 53448\/10, 10 January 2013;Lorenz v. Austria, no 11537\/11, \u00a7\u00a7 58-64, 20 July 2017;M.C. v. Poland, no 23692\/09, \u00a7 88, 3 March 2015;Matencio v. France, no 58749\/00, \u00a7\u00a7 76-77, 15 January 2004;Merabishvili v. Georgia [GC], no 72508\/13, 28 November 2017;Moreels v. Belgium, no 43717\/09, 9 January 2014;Morsink v. the Netherlands, no 48865\/99, \u00a7\u00a7 66-69, 11 May 2004;Murray v. the Netherlands [GC], no 10511\/10, \u00a7\u00a7 105-106, 26 April 2016;Naumenko v. Ukraine, no 42023\/98, \u00a7 112, 10 February 2004;O.H. v. Germany, no 4646\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 88 91, 24 November 2011;O\u2019Hara v. the United Kingdom, no 37555\/97, \u00a7 34, ECHR 2001-X;Osterm\u00fcnchner v. Germany, no 36035\/04, 22 March 2012;Oukili v. Belgium, no 43663\/09, 9 January 2014;Pankiewicz v. Poland, no 34151\/04, \u00a7\u00a7 42 45, 12 February 2008;Papillo v. Switzerland, no 43368\/08, \u00a7 48, 27 January 2015;Plaisier v. Belgium, no 28785\/11, 9 January 2014;Raffray Taddei v. France, no 36435\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 58 59, 21 December 2010;Rivi\u00e8re v. France, no 33834\/03, 11 July 2006;S. v. Germany, no 3300\/10, \u00a7\u00a7 97-99, 28 June 2012;Saadi c the United Kingdom [GC], no 13229\/03, \u00a7\u00a7 67 and 69, ECHR 2008;Saadouni v. Belgium, no 50658\/09, 9 January 2014;Scordino v. Italy (no 1) [GC], no 36813\/97, \u00a7\u00a7 179-180, ECHR 2006 V;Selmouni v. France [GC], no 25803\/94, \u00a7 99, ECHR 1999 V;Slawomir Musial v. Poland, no 28300\/06, 20 January 2009;Stanev v. Bulgaria [GC], no 36760\/06, ECHR 2012;Tanase v. Moldova [GC], no 7\/08, \u00a7 105, ECHR 2010;Van Meroye v. Belgium, no 330\/09, 9 January 2014;W.D. v. Belgium, no 73548\/13, 6 September 2016;W.P. v. Germany, no 55594\/13, \u00a7\u00a7 65-66, 6 October 2016;Winterwerp v. the Netherlands, no 6301\/73, report of the Commission of 15 December 1977, (DR), \u00a7 84;Winterwerp v. the Netherlands, 24 October 1979, \u00a7 39, Series A no 33", "external_sources": "The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, adopted by the United Nations General Assembly on 13 December 2006;Articles 12 and 17, as well as the explanatory memorandum of the Recommendation REC (2004) 10 of the Committee of Ministers to member states concerning the protection of the human rights and dignity of persons with mental disorders;Report by the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) of 8 March 2018 on the visit to Belgium from 27 March to 6 April 2017", "conclusion": "Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention;Article 5-1-e - Persons of unsound mind);No violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention;Article 5-1-e - Persons of unsound mind);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": null, "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0131JUD001805211" }, "92": { "webcast_id": "1805211_06062018", "hearing_date": "2018-06-06 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Rooman v. Belgium (no. 18052\/11)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "18052\/11", "case_id": "001-175846", "case_name": "CASE OF ROOMAN v. BELGIUM", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-175846", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2017-07-18 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 3, "court": "5", "issue": "\n", "represented_by": "HISSEL V. ; VERSIE B.", "respondent": "BEL", "articles": "3;5;5-1;5-1-e;34;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Aerts v. Belgium, 30 July 1998, \u00a7 46, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 V;Ashingdane v. the United Kingdom, 28 May 1985, Series A no 93;Bamouhammad v. Belgium, no 47687\/13, \u00a7\u00a7 115-123, 17 November 2015;Claes v. Belgium, no 43418\/09, 10 January 2013;De Donder and De Clippel v. Belgium, no 8595\/06, \u00a7 100, 6 December 2011;Dufoort v. Belgium, no 43653\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 76, 77 and 79, 10 January 2013;G\u00e4fgen v. Germany [GC], no 22978\/05, \u00a7 115, ECHR 2010;Gelaude v. Belgium, no 43733\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 26-30, 9 January 2014;L.B. v. Belgium, no 22831\/08, 2 October 2012;Lankester v. Belgium, no 22283\/10, 9 January 2014;Moreels v. Belgium, no 43717\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 29-33, 9 January 2014;Murray v. the Netherlands [GC], no 10511\/10, ECHR 2016;Oukili v. Belgium, no 43663\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 29-33, 9 January 2014;Papillo v. Switzerland, no 43368\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 41-43, 27 January 2015;Saadi v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 13229\/03, \u00a7 69, ECHR 2008;Saadouni v. Belgium, no 50658\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 37-41, 9 January 2014;Scordino v. Italy (no 1) [GC], no 36813\/97, \u00a7\u00a7 179-180, ECHR 2006 V;Stanev v. Bulgaria [GC], no 36760\/06, \u00a7 147, ECHR 2012;Swennen v. Belgium, no 53448\/10, \u00a7\u00a7 69 72, 10 January 2013;T\u0103nase v. Moldova [GC], no 7\/08, \u00a7 105, ECHR 2010;Torreggiani and Others v. Italy, nos. 43517\/09 and 6 others, \u00a7 50, 8 January 2013;W.D. v. Belgium, no 73548\/13, 6 September 2016;Winterwerp v. the Netherlands, 24 October 1979, \u00a7 51, Series A no 33;Y.Y. v. Turkey, no 14793\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 52-55, ECHR 2015 (extracts)", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);No violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention;Article 5-1-e - Persons of unsound mind);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Jon Fridrik Kj\u00f8lbro;Ledi Bianku;Neboj\u0161a Vu\u010dini\u0107;Paul Lemmens;Robert Spano", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0718JUD001805211" }, "93": { "webcast_id": "3826308_23052018", "hearing_date": "2018-05-23 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Georgia v. Russia (II) (no. 38263\/08)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "38263\/08", "case_id": "001-224629", "case_name": "CASE OF GEORGIA v. RUSSIA (II)", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-224629", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 12, "document_date": "2023-04-28 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "", "represented_by": "", "respondent": "RUS", "articles": "41;38;46;46-2;2;2-1;2-2;3;5;5-1;8;8-1;P1-1;P1-1-1;P4-2;P4-2-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Abu Zubaydah v. Lithuania, no. 46454\/11, \u00a7\u00a7 480-83, 31 May 2018;Ble\u010di\u0107 v. Croatia [GC], no. 59532\/00, \u00a7 67, ECHR 2006-III;Carter v. Russia, no. 20914\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 92-94, 21 September 2021;Chiragov and Others v. Armenia [GC], no. 13216\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 128-36, ECHR 2015;Chiragov and Others v. Armenia (just satisfaction) [GC], no. 13216\/05, \u00a7 60, 12 December 2017;Cyprus v. Turkey (just satisfaction) [GC], no. 25781\/94, ECHR 2014;Cyprus v. Turkey [GC], no. 25781\/94, \u00a7\u00a7 10-12, ECHR 2001 IV;Denmark, Norway and Sweden v. Greece, no. 4448\/70, Commission (Plenary) decision of 16 July 1970;Fedotova and Others v. Russia [GC], nos. 40792\/10 and 2 others, 17 January 2023;Georgia v. Russia (I) (just satisfaction) [GC], no. 13255\/07, 29 January 2019;Georgia v. Russia (I) [GC], no. 13255\/07, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Janowiec and Others v. Russia [GC], nos. 55508\/07 and 29520\/09, \u00a7 202, ECHR 2013;Kudukhova v. Georgia, nos. 8274\/09 and 8275\/09, \u00a7 33, 20 November 2018;Lisnyy and Others v. Ukraine and Russia (dec.), nos. 5355\/15, 44913\/15 and 50853\/15, \u00a7 30, 5 July 2016;Mocanu and Others v. Romania [GC], nos. 10865\/09 and 2 others, \u00a7 201, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Sargsyan v. Azerbaijan [GC], no. 40167\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 176-84, ECHR 2015;Svetova and Others v. Russia, no. 54714\/17, \u00a7 30, 24 January 2023;Ukraine and the Netherlands v. Russia (dec.) [GC], nos. 8019\/16 and 2 others, 25 January 2023;Varnava and Others v. Turkey [GC], nos. 16064\/90 and 8 others, ECHR 2009", "external_sources": "Interim Resolution CM\/ResDH(2022)254 of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe, adopted on 22 September 2022, on the execution of the Court\u2019s judgment in Georgia v. Russia (I)", "conclusion": "Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": null, "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0428JUD003826308" }, "94": { "webcast_id": "3826308_23052018", "hearing_date": "2018-05-23 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Georgia v. Russia (II) (no. 38263\/08)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "38263\/08", "case_id": "001-207757", "case_name": "CASE OF GEORGIA v. RUSSIA (II)", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-207757", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 14, "document_date": "2021-01-21 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "", "represented_by": "", "respondent": "RUS", "articles": "1;2;2-1;2-2;3;5;5-1;8;8-1;15;33;35;35-1;35-3-a;38;41;P1-1;P1-1-1;P1-2;P4-2;P4-2-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Akdivar and Others v. Turkey, 16 September 1996, \u00a7 88, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 IV;Amuyeva and Others v. Russia, no 17321\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 83-84, 25 November 2010;Ananyev and Others v. Russia [GC], nos. 42525\/07 and 60800\/08, 10 January 2012;Andreou v. Turkey (dec.), no 45653\/99, 3 June 2008;Av\u015far v. Turkey, no 25657\/94, \u00a7\u00a7 413 416, ECHR 2001 VII (extracts);Bankovi\u0107 and Others v. Belgium and Others (dec.) [GC], no 52207\/99, ECHR 2001 XII;Bilgin v. Turkey, no 23819\/94, 16 November 2000;Catan and Others v. the Republic of Moldova and Russia [GC], nos. 43370\/04, 8252\/05 and 18454\/06, ECHR 2012 (extracts);Chiragov and Others v. Armenia [GC], no 13216\/05, \u00a7 168, ECHR 2015;Cyprus v. Turkey [GC], no 25781\/94, ECHR 2001-IV;Cyprus v. Turkey (just satisfaction) [GC], no 25781\/94, \u00a7 43, ECHR 2014;Dula\u015f v. Turkey, no 25801\/94, 30 January 2001;El-Masri v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia [GC], no 39630\/09, ECHR 2012;Estamirov and Others v. Russia, no 60272\/00, \u00a7 114, 12 October 2006;Georgia v. Russia (I) (just satisfaction) [GC], no 13255\/07, \u00a7 20, 29 January 2019;Georgia v. Russia (I) [GC], no 13255\/07, ECHR 2014;Gongadze v. Ukraine, no 34056\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 170-171, ECHR 2005 XI;G\u00fczelyurtlu and Others v. Cyprus and Turkey [GC], no 36925\/07, 29 January 2019;Hasan v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 29750\/09, ECHR 2014;Idalov v. Russia [GC], no 5826\/03, 22 May 2012;Ila\u015fcu and Others v. Moldova and Russia [GC], no. 48787\/99, ECHR 2004-VII;Iljina and Sarulien\u0117 v. Lithuania, no 32293\/05, \u00a7 47, 15 March 2011;\u0130pek v. Turkey, no 25760\/94, ECHR 2004 II (extracts);Ireland v. the United Kingdom, no 5310\/71, Report of the Commission of 25 January 1976, Series B no 23 I, pp. 395-396;Isaak and Others v. Turkey (dec.), no 44587\/98, 28 September 2006;Issa and Others v. Turkey, no 31821\/96, 16 November 2004;Jaloud v. the Netherlands [GC], no 47708\/08, ECHR 2014;Khashiyev and Akayeva v. Russia, nos. 57942\/00 and 57945\/00, \u00a7 147, 24 February 2005;K\u0131l\u0131\u00e7 v. Turkey, no 22492\/93, \u00a7\u00a7 64 and 77, ECHR 2000 III;Loizidou v. Turkey (fond), 18 December 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 VI;Loizidou v. Turkey (exceptions pr\u00e9liminaires), 23 March 1995, Series A no 310;M.C. v. Bulgaria, no 39272\/98, \u00a7 149, ECHR 2003-XII;M.N. and Others v. la Belgium (dec.) [GC], no 3599\/18, 5 March 2020;Mahmut Kaya v. Turkey, no 22535\/93, \u00a7\u00a7 87 and 101, ECHR 2000 III;Medvedyev and Others v. France [GC], no 3394\/03, ECHR 2010;Members of the Gldani Congregation of Jehovah\u2019s Witnesses and Others v. Georgia, no. 71156\/01, 3 May 2007;Mente\u015f and Others v. Turkey, 28 November 1997, Reports 1997 VIII;Musayeva and Others v. Russia, no 74239\/01, \u00a7\u00a7 79-82, 26 July 2007;Mozer v. the Republic of Moldova and Russia [GC], no 11138\/10, ECHR 2016;Pad and Others v. Turkey (dec.), no 60167\/00, 28 June 2007;Sel\u00e7uk and Asker v. Turkey, 24 April 1998, Reports 1998 II;Solomou and Others v. Turkey, no 36832\/97, 24 June 2008;Y\u00f6yler v. Turkey, no 26973\/95, 24 July 2003;Z and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 29392\/95, \u00a7\u00a7 73-75, ECHR 2001-V", "external_sources": "The Hague Regulations concerning the Laws and Customs of War on Land of 18 October 1907;Geneva Conventions of 1949 and Additional Protocol", "conclusion": "Preliminary objections dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione loci;Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Life;Article 2-2 - Use of force) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for home);Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Liberty of person);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Torture) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 2 of Protocol No. 4 - Freedom of movement-{general} (Article 2 para. 1 of Protocol No. 4 - Freedom of movement);No violation of Article 2 of Protocol No. 1 - Right to education-{general} (Article 2 of Protocol No. 1 - Right to education);Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Violation of Article 38 - Examination of the case-{general} (Article 38 - Obligation to furnish all necessary facilities);Just satisfaction reserved (Article 41 - Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Anatoly Kovler;Armen Harutyunyan;Dmitry Dedov;Ganna Yudkivska;Georgios A. Serghides;Helen Keller;Helena J\u00e4derblom;Isabelle Berro-Lef\u00e8vre;Jon Fridrik Kj\u00f8lbro;Karel Jungwiert;Krzysztof Wojtyczek;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska;Nona Tsotsoria;Paul Lemmens;Paulo Pinto De Albuquerque;Peer Lorenzen;Robert Spano;Vincent A. De Gaetano;Yonko Grozev;Zdravka Kalaydjieva;Gabriele Kucsko-Stadlmayer;Tim Eicke", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0121JUD003826308" }, "95": { "webcast_id": "3826308_23052018", "hearing_date": "2018-05-23 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Georgia v. Russia (II) (no. 38263\/08)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "38263\/08", "case_id": "001-108097", "case_name": "GEORGIA v. RUSSIA (II)", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-108097", "type": "DECISIONS", "typedescription": 8, "document_date": "", "collection": "CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG", "importance": 3, "court": "23", "issue": "", "represented_by": "N\/A", "respondent": "RUS", "articles": "33;35;35-1;35-3-a", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Akdivar and Others v. Turkey, 16 September 1996, \u00a7 68, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-IV;Al-Adsani v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 35763\/97, \u00a7 55, ECHR 2001-XI;Al-Skeini and Others v. the United Kingdom ([GC], no. 55721\/07, 7 July 2011 ECHR 2011-...;Cyprus v. Turkey, no. 25781\/94, Commission decision of 28 June 1996, Decisions and Reports (DR) 86-A, p. 130;Cyprus v. Turkey, no. 25781\/94, Commission decision of 28 June 1996, DR 86-A, p. 130;Denmark v. Turkey (dec), no. 34382\/97, 8 June 1999;Drozd and Janousek v. France and Spain, 26 June 1992, \u00a7 91, Series A no. 240;Ergi v. Turkey, 28 July 1998, \u00a7\u00a7 79 and 82, Reports 1998-IV;France, Norway, Denmark, Sweden, Netherlands v. Turkey, nos. 9940-9944\/82, Commission decision of 6 December 1983, DR 35;Georgia v. Russia (no. I) (dec.), no. 13255\/07, 30 June 2009;Ilascu and Others v. Moldova and Russia (dec.) [GC], no. 48787\/99, 4 July 2001;Ireland v. the United Kingdom, 18 January 1978, \u00a7 159, Series A no. 25;Isayeva v. Russia, no. 57950\/00, \u00a7\u00a7 180 and 210, 24 February 2005;Loizidou v. Turkey (preliminary objections) [GC], 23 March 1995, Series A no. 310;Varnava and Others v. Turkey [GC], nos. 16064\/90, 16065\/90, 16066\/90, 16068\/90, 16069\/90, 16070\/90, 16071\/90, 16072\/90 and 16073\/90, 18 September 2009", "external_sources": "Order of 15 October 2008 of the International Court of Justice;Judgment of 1 April 2011 of the International Court of Justice;Report of 27 November 2008 of the ODIHR of the OSCE;Report of September 2009 by the Independent International Fact-Finding Mission of the European Union on the Conflict in Georgia;Reports of 17 December 2008 and 26 January 2009 of the Monitoring Committee and Resolutions nos. 1633 and 1647 of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe", "conclusion": "Preliminary objections joined to merits;Admissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione loci;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae", "separate_opinion": "", "judges": "Anatoly Kovler;Isabelle Berro-Lef\u00e8vre;Karel Jungwiert;Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska;Nona Tsotsoria;Peer Lorenzen;Zdravka Kalaydjieva", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1213DEC003826308" }, "96": { "webcast_id": "4728715_18042018", "hearing_date": "2018-04-18 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Ilias and Ahmed v. Hungary (no. 47287\/15)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "47287\/15", "case_id": "001-198760", "case_name": "CASE OF ILIAS AND AHMED v. HUNGARY", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-198760", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2019-11-21 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Government Decree no. 191\/2015. (VII. 21.) on the definition of safe countries of origin and safe third countries", "represented_by": "POH\u00c1RNOK B.", "respondent": "HUN", "articles": "3;5;5-1;5-1-f;5-4;13;35;35-1;35-3-a;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Abdulaziz, Cabales and Balkandali v. the United Kingdom, 28 May 1985, \u00a7 67, Series A no. 94;Abuyeva and Others v. Russia, no. 27065\/05, \u00a7 222, 2 December 2010;Al Dulimi and Montana Management Inc. v. Switzerland [GC], no. 5809\/08, \u00a7 78, 21 June 2016;Allan v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 48539\/99, 28 August 2001;Amuur v. France, 25 June 1996, Reports 1996 III;Avoti\u0146\u0161 v. Latvia [GC], no. 17502\/07, \u00a7 105, 23 May 2016;Azinas v. Cyprus [GC], no. 56679\/00, \u00a7 32, ECHR 2004-III;Babajanov v. Turkey, no. 49867\/08, \u00a7 43 in fine, 10 May 2016;Bosphorus Hava Yollar\u0131 Turizm ve Ticaret Anonim \u015eirketi v. Ireland [GC], no. 45036\/98, \u00a7 157, ECHR 2005-V;Budrevich v. the Czech Republic, no. 65303\/10, \u00a7 73, 17 October 2013;Buzadji v. Moldova [GC], no. 23755\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 106-10, 5 July 2016;Chahal v. the United Kingdom, 15 November 1996, \u00a7 96, Reports 1996 V;D.H. and Others v. the Czech Republic [GC], no. 57325\/00 \u00a7 109, ECHR 2007 IV;De Tommaso v. Italy [GC], no. 43395\/09, \u00a7 80, 23 February 2017;De Wilde, Ooms and Versyp v. Belgium, 18 June 1971, \u00a7 65, Series A, no. 12;F.G. v. Sweden [GC], no. 43611\/11, 23 March 2016;F\u00e1bi\u00e1n v. Hungary [GC], no. 78117\/13, 5 September 2017;Gahramanov v. Azerbaijan (dec.), no. 26291\/06, 15 October 2013;Gillberg v. Sweden [GC], no. 41723\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 53-55, 3 April 2012;G\u00f6\u00e7 v. Turkey [GC], no. 36590\/97, \u00a7\u00a7 35-37, ECHR 2002-V;Guerra and Others v. Italy, 19 February 1998, \u00a7 44, Reports 1998 I;Guzzardi v. Italy, 6 November 1980, \u00a7 106, Series A no. 39;H.L.R. v. France, 29 April 1997, \u00a7 34, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-III;Herrmann v. Germany [GC], no. 9300\/07, \u00a7 38, 26 June 2012;Hilal v. the United Kingdom, no. 45276\/99, \u00a7 60, ECHR 2001-II;Hirsi Jamaa and Others v. Italy [GC], no. 27765\/09, \u00a7 114, ECHR 2012;I.I. v. Bulgaria, no. 44082\/98, \u00a7\u00a7 84-87, 9 June 2005;J.R. and Others v. Greece, no. 22696\/16, 25 January 2018;K. and T. v. Finland [GC], no. 25702\/94, \u00a7\u00a7 137-41, ECHR 2001-VII;K.R.S. v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 32733\/08, 2 December 2008;Kasparov v. Russia, no. 53659\/07, \u00a7 36, 11 October 2016;Khlaifia and Others v. Italy [GC], no. 16483\/12, 15 December 2016;Kova\u010di\u0107 and Others v. Slovenia [GC], nos. 44574\/98 and 2 others, \u00a7 194, 3 October 2008;Kuri\u0107 and Others v. Slovenia [GC], no. 26828\/06, ECHR 2012 (extracts);Kurt v. Turkey, 25 May 1998, \u00a7 123, Reports 1998 III;M.S.S. v. Belgium and Greece [GC], no. 30696\/09, ECHR 2011;Mahdid and Haddar v. Austria (dec.), no. 74762\/01, ECHR 2005-XIII (extracts);Mamatkulov and Askarov v. Turkey [GC], nos. 46827\/99 and 46951\/99, \u00a7 67, ECHR 2005-I;Mogo\u015f v. Romania (dec.), no. 20420\/02, 6 May 2004;Mohammadi v. Austria, no. 71932\/12, 3 July 2014;Mohammed Hussein and Others v. the Netherlands and Italy (dec.), no. 27725\/10, \u00a7\u00a7 62-79, 2 April 2013;Murray v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 10511\/10, 26 April 2016;Nada v. Switzerland [GC], no. 10593\/08, \u00a7 225, ECHR 2012;Nolan and K. v. Russia, no. 2512\/04, \u00a7\u00a7 93-96, 12 February 2009;Osypenko v. Ukraine, no. 4634\/04, \u00a7 48, 9 November 2010;Paposhvili v. Belgium [GC], no. 41738\/10, \u00a7 193, 13 December 2016;Perna v. Italy [GC], no. 48898\/99, \u00a7\u00a7 23-24, ECHR 2003-V;Pisano v. Italy (striking out) [GC], no. 36732\/97, \u00a7 27, 24 October 2002;Radomilja and Others v. Croatia [GC], nos. 37685\/10 and 22768\/12, \u00a7 114, 20 March 2018;Riad and Idiab v. Belgium, nos. 29787\/03 and 29810\/03, \u00a7 68, 24 January 2008;Sabri G\u00fcne\u015f v. Turkey [GC], no. 27396\/06, \u00a7 44, 29 June 2012;Salah Sheekh v. the Netherlands, no. 1948\/04, \u00a7 135, 11 January 2007;Shamsa v. Poland, nos. 45355\/99 and 45357\/99, \u00a7 47, 27 November 2003;Sharifi v. Austria, no. 60104\/08, 5 December 2013;Sisojeva and Others v. Latvia (striking out) [GC], no. 60654\/00, \u00a7 61, ECHR 2007-I;Soering v. the United Kingdom, 7 July 1989, \u00a7\u00a7 90-91, Series A no. 161;T.I. v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 43844\/98, ECHR 2000-III;Tarakhel v. Switzerland [GC], no. 29217\/12, ECHR 2014 (extracts);\u00dcner v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 46410\/99, \u00a7 41, ECHR 2006-XII;Venskut\u0117 v. Lithuania, no. 10645\/08, \u00a7 72, 11 December 2012;Vijayanathan and Pusparajah v. France, 27 August 1992, \u00a7\u00a7 43 47, Series A no. 241-B;Vilvarajah and Others v. the United Kingdom, 30 October 1991, \u00a7 103, Series A no. 215;Zubac v. Croatia [GC], no. 40160\/12, \u00a7 56, 5 April 2018", "external_sources": "Articles 38 and 39 of the Asylum Procedures Directive;UNHCR report \u201cSerbia as a Country of Asylum: Observations on the Situation of Asylum-Seekers and Beneficiaries of International Protection in Serbia\u201d prepared in August 2012;\u201cCrossing Boundaries: The new asylum procedure at the border and restrictions to accessing protection in Hungary\u201d, report by the European Council for Refugees and Exiles (ECRE) prepared on 1 October 2015;Report (SG\/Inf(2017)33) of 13 October 2017 of the Ambassador Tom\u00e1\u0161 Bo\u010dek, Special Representative of the Secretary General of the Council of Europe on migration and refugees, fact-finding mission of June 2017;Serbian Government\u2019s \u201cDecision Determining the List of Safe Countries of Origin and Safe Third Countries\u201d, Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia, no. 67\/2009, applicable in 2015;Criterion \u201cd\u201d of the 2009 Guidelines on human rights protection in the context of accelerated asylum procedures of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe, 1 July 2009, section VI;Report to the Hungarian Government on the visit to Hungary carried out by the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) from 21 to 27 October 2015", "conclusion": "Preliminary objection allowed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Six-month period;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Expulsion) (Serbia);No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Ale\u0161 Pejchal;Andr\u00e1s Saj\u00f3;Andr\u00e9 Potocki;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Dmitry Dedov;Ganna Yudkivska;Jon Fridrik Kj\u00f8lbro;Krzysztof Wojtyczek;Ledi Bianku;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Marko Bo\u0161njak;M\u0101rti\u0146\u0161 Mits;Neboj\u0161a Vu\u010dini\u0107;Nona Tsotsoria;Paul Lemmens;Robert Spano;Vincent A. De Gaetano;Yonko Grozev;Gabriele Kucsko-Stadlmayer;Georges Ravarani;Ksenija Turkovi\u0107", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1121JUD004728715" }, "97": { "webcast_id": "4728715_18042018", "hearing_date": "2018-04-18 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Ilias and Ahmed v. Hungary (no. 47287\/15)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "47287\/15", "case_id": "001-172091", "case_name": "CASE OF ILIAS AND AHMED v. HUNGARY", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-172091", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2017-03-14 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 3, "court": "7", "issue": "Articles 31 \u00a7 8 (b), 33, 38 \u00a7 1 and 43 of Directive 2013\/32\/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection (recast) ; Article 8 \u00a7 1 of Directive 2013\/33\/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 laying down standards for the reception of applicants for international protection (recast) ; Sections 2, 2(k), 31\/A , 66 (2) d, 71\/A (1), (2) and (7) of Act no. LXXX of 2007 on Asylum (\u201cthe Asylum Act\u201d) ; Government Decree no. 191\/2015. (VII.21.) on the definition of safe countries of origin and safe third countries\n", "represented_by": "POHARNOK B.", "respondent": "HUN", "articles": "3;5;5-1;5-1-f;5-4;13;13+3;35;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Aden Ahmed v. Malta, no. 55352\/12, \u00a7\u00a7 97-99, 23 July 2013;Amuur v. France, 25 June 1996, \u00a7 43, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 III;Anheuser-Busch Inc. v. Portugal [GC], no. 73049\/01, \u00a7 86, ECHR 2007 I;Arat v. Turkey, no. 10309\/03, \u00a7 46, 10 November 2009;Austin and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 39692\/09, 40713\/09 and 41008\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 57-58, ECHR 2012;Belevitskiy v. Russia, no. 72967\/01, \u00a7 91, 1 March 2007;Creang\u0103 v. Romania [GC], no. 29226\/03, \u00a7 91, 23 February 2012;De Tommaso v. Italy [GC], no. 43395\/09, \u00a7 80, 23 February 2017;F.G. v. Sweden [GC], no. 43611\/11, ECHR 2016;Guzzardi v. Italy, 6 November 1980, \u00a7 95, Series A no. 39;H.L. v. the United Kingdom, no. 45508\/99, \u00a7 91, ECHR 2004 IX;H.M. v. Switzerland, no. 39187\/98, \u00a7 45, ECHR 2002 II;Hirsi Jamaa and Others v. Italy [GC], no. 27765\/09, ECHR 2012;Jeunesse v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 12738\/10, \u00a7 110, 3 October 2014;Khlaifia and Others v. Italy [GC], no. 16483\/12, 15 December 2016;Kholmurodov v. Russia, no. 58923\/14, \u00a7 84, 1 March 2016;Kud\u0142a v. Poland [GC], no. 30210\/96, \u00a7 157, ECHR 2000 XI;Lokpo and Tour\u00e9 v. Hungary, no. 10816\/10, \u00a7 22, 20 September 2011;M.S.S. v. Belgium and Greece [GC], no. 30696\/09, \u00a7 223, ECHR 2011;Mahamed Jama v. Malta, no. 10290\/13, \u00a7 100, 26 November 2015;Mamatkulov and Askarov v. Turkey [GC], nos. 46827\/99 and 46951\/99, \u00a7 69, ECHR 2005 I;Medvedyev and Others v. France [GC], no. 3394\/03, \u00a7 79, ECHR 2010;Mogo\u015f v. Romania (dec.), no. 20420\/02, 6 May 2004;Mooren v. Germany [GC], no 11364\/03, \u00a7 79, 9 July 2009;Muminov v. Russia, no. 42502\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 91-92, 11 December 2008;Murray v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 10511\/10, \u00a7 83, ECHR 2016;N.A. v. the United Kingdom, no. 25904\/07, \u00a7 119, 17 July 2008;Nakhmanovich v. Russia, no. 55669\/00, \u00a7 70, 2 March 2006;Nizomkhon Dzhurayev v. Russia, no. 31890\/11, \u00a7 113, 3 October 2013;R.C. v. Sweden, no. 41827\/07, \u00a7 52, 9 March 2010;Riad and Idiab v. Belgium, nos. 29787\/03 and 29810\/03, \u00a7\u00a7 68-71, 24 January 2008;Rohlena v. the Czech Republic [GC], no. 59552\/08, \u00a7 51, ECHR 2015;Saadi v. Italy [GC], no. 37201\/06, ECHR 2008;Shamsa v. Poland, nos. 45355\/99 and 45357\/99, \u00a7 47, 27 November 2003;Stanev v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 36760\/06, ECHR 2012;Sta\u0161aitis v. Lithuania, no. 47679\/99, \u00a7 67, 21 March 2002;Storck v. Germany, no. 61603\/00, \u00a7 73, ECHR 2005\u2011V;Takush v. Greece, no. 2853\/09, \u00a7 40, 17 January 2012;Ullens de Schooten and Rezabek v. Belgium, nos. 3989\/07 and 38353\/07, \u00a7 54, 20 September 2011;\u00dcner v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 46410\/99, \u00a7 54, ECHR 2006 XII;Waite and Kennedy v. Germany [GC], no. 26083\/94, \u00a7 54, ECHR 1999 I", "external_sources": "\u201cHungary as a country of asylum. Observations on restrictive legal measures and subsequent practice implemented between July 2015 and March 2016\u201d report by the UNHCR (published in May 2016);\u201cCrossing Boundaries: The new asylum procedure at the border and restrictions to accessing protection in Hungary\u201d report by the European Council for Refugees and Exiles (ECRE) (prepared on 1 October 2015);\u201cCase Law Fact Sheet: Prevention of Dublin Transfers to Hungary\u201d report by the European Council for Refugees and Exiles (ECRE) (prepared in January 2016);Report to the Hungarian Government on its visit to Hungary from 21 to 27 October 2015 by the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT)\n", "conclusion": "Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention;Article 5-1-f - Expulsion;Prevent unauthorised entry into country);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Review of lawfulness of detention);No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 13+3 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 3 - Inhuman treatment;Prohibition of torture);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Expulsion) (Serbia);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "FALSE", "judges": "Andr\u00e1s Saj\u00f3;Ganna Yudkivska;Krzysztof Wojtyczek;Marko Bo\u0161njak;Nona Tsotsoria;Vincent A. De Gaetano;Gabriele Kucsko-Stadlmayer", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0314JUD004728715" }, "98": { "webcast_id": "4728715_18042018", "hearing_date": "2018-04-18 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Ilias and Ahmed v. Hungary (no. 47287\/15)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "47287\/15", "case_id": "001-159751", "case_name": "ILIAS AND AHMED v. HUNGARY", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-159751", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "", "respondent": "HUN", "articles": "3;5;5-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Communicated", "separate_opinion": "", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "99": { "webcast_id": "4728715_18042018", "hearing_date": "2018-04-18 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Ilias and Ahmed v. Hungary (no. 47287\/15)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "47287\/15", "case_id": "001-168641", "case_name": "ILIAS AND AHMED v. HUNGARY", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-168641", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "POHARNOK, BARBARA", "respondent": "HUN", "articles": "3;5;5-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Communicated", "separate_opinion": "", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "100": { "webcast_id": "6141115_18042018", "hearing_date": "2018-04-18 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Z.A. and Others v. Russia (nos. 61411\/15, 61420\/15, 61427\/15 and 3028\/16)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "61411\/15", "case_id": "001-198811", "case_name": "CASE OF Z.A. AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-198811", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2019-11-21 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "", "represented_by": "DAVIDYAN E. ; TRENINA D. ; ZHARINOV K.", "respondent": "RUS", "articles": "3;5;5-1;5-1-f;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "A.A. v. Greece, no. 12186\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 57-65, 22 July 2010;Abdi Mahamud v. Malta, no. 56796\/13, \u00a7\u00a7 89-90, 3 May 2016;Abdulaziz, Cabales and Balkandali v. the United Kingdom, 28 May 1985, \u00a7 67, Series A no. 94;Abdullahi Elmi and Aweys Abubakar v. Malta, nos. 25794\/13 and 28151\/13, \u00a7\u00a7 113-14, 22 November 2016;Abou Amer v. Romania, no. 14521\/03, \u00a7 39, 24 May 2011;Alimov v. Turkey, no. 14344\/13, \u00a7\u00a7 84-85, 6 September 2016;Amuur v. France, 25 June 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 III;Ananyev and Others v. Russia, nos. 42525\/07 and 60800\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 121-23, 10 January 2012;Boudraa v. Turkey, no. 1009\/16, \u00a7\u00a7 28-29, 28 November 2017;Buzadji v. Moldova [GC], no. 23755\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 106-10, 5 July 2016;Chahal v. the United Kingdom, 15 November 1996, \u00a7 73, Reports 1996 V;De Tommaso v. Italy [GC], no. 43395\/09, \u00a7 80, 23 February 2017;De Wilde, Ooms and Versyp v. Belgium, 18 June 1971, \u00a7 65, Series A no. 12;Dougoz v. Greece, no. 40907\/98, \u00a7 44, ECHR 2001 II;E.A. v. Greece, no. 74308\/10, \u00a7\u00a7 50-51, 30 July 2015;El-Masri v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia [GC], no. 39630\/09, \u00a7 230, ECHR 2012;Gahramanov v. Azerbaijan (dec.), no. 26291\/06, 15 October 2013;I.I. v. Bulgaria, no. 44082\/98, \u00a7\u00a7 84-87, 9 June 2005;Ilias and Ahmed v. Hungary [GC], no. 47287\/15, \u00a7\u00a7 244-46, 21 November 2019;Kaja v. Greece, no. 32927\/03, \u00a7\u00a7 45-46, 27 July 2006;Kanagaratnam v. Belgium, no. 15297\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 94-95, 13 December 2011;Kasparov v. Russia, no. 53659\/07, \u00a7 36, 11 October 2016;Khlaifia and Others v. Italy [GC], no. 16483\/12, 15 December 2016;Kud\u0142a v. Poland [GC], no. 30210\/96, \u00a7 94, ECHR 2000 XI;Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772\/95, \u00a7 119, ECHR 2000 IV;Longa Yonkeu v. Latvia, no. 57229\/09, \u00a7 131, 15 November 2011;M.S.S. v. Belgium and Greece, [GC], no. 30696\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 216-18, ECHR 2011;Mahamed Jama v. Malta, no. 10290\/13, \u00a7\u00a7 86-89, 26 November 2015;Mahdid and Haddar v. Austria (dec.), no. 74762\/01, ECHR 2005-XIII (extracts);Mogo\u015f v. Romania (dec.), no. 20420\/02, 6 May 2004;Mur\u0161i\u0107 v. Croatia [GC], no. 7334\/13, \u00a7 128, 20 October 2016;Nada v. Switzerland [GC], no. 10593\/08, \u00a7 225, ECHR 2012;Nolan and K. v. Russia, no. 2512\/04, \u00a7\u00a7 93-96, 12 February 2009;Osypenko v. Ukraine, no. 4634\/04, \u00a7 48, 9 November 2010;Rahimi v. Greece, no. 8687\/08, \u00a7 62, 5 April 2011;Rashed v. the Czech Republic, no. 298\/07, \u00a7 70, 27 November 2008;Riad and Idiab v. Belgium, nos. 29787\/03 and 29810\/03, 24 January 2008;S.D. v. Greece, no. 53541\/07, 11 June 2009;S.F. and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 8138\/16, \u00a7\u00a7 78-83, 7 December 2017;Saadi v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 13229\/03, ECHR 2008;Shamsa v. Poland, nos. 45355\/99 and 45357\/99, 27 November 2003;Shioshvili and Others v. Russia, no. 19356\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 83-86, 20 December 2016;Suso Musa v. Malta, no. 42337\/12, 23 July 2013;Tabesh v. Greece, no. 8256\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 38-44, 26 November 2009;Venskut\u0117 v. Lithuania, no. 10645\/08, \u00a7 72, 11 December 2012", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Deprivation of liberty;Article 5-1-f - Prevent unauthorised entry into country);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "FALSE", "judges": "Alena Pol\u00e1\u010dkov\u00e1;Ale\u0161 Pejchal;Andr\u00e9 Potocki;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Branko Lubarda;Dmitry Dedov;Georgios A. Serghides;Helen Keller;Helena J\u00e4derblom;Jon Fridrik Kj\u00f8lbro;Ledi Bianku;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;M\u0101rti\u0146\u0161 Mits;Neboj\u0161a Vu\u010dini\u0107;Paul Lemmens;Robert Spano;Yonko Grozev;Georges Ravarani;Ksenija Turkovi\u0107;Pere Pastor Vilanova", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1121JUD006141115" }, "101": { "webcast_id": "6141115_18042018", "hearing_date": "2018-04-18 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Z.A. and Others v. Russia (nos. 61411\/15, 61420\/15, 61427\/15 and 3028\/16)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "61411\/15", "case_id": "001-172107", "case_name": "CASE OF Z.A. AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-172107", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2017-03-28 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 3, "court": "6", "issue": "", "represented_by": "DAVIDYAN E. ; TRENINA D.", "respondent": "RUS", "articles": "3;5;5-1;5-1-f;41;46;46-2", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Abou Amer v. Romania, no. 14521\/03, \u00a7 37, 24 May 2011;Amuur v. France, 25 June 1996, \u00a7\u00a7 43-52, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 III;Ananyev and Others v. Russia, nos. 42525\/07 and 60800\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 121-123, 10 January 2012;Austin and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 39692\/09 and 2 others, \u00a7 58, ECHR 2012;El-Masri v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia [GC], no. 39630\/09, \u00a7 230, ECHR 2012;M.S.S. v. Belgium and Greece [GC], no. 30696\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 216-218, ECHR 2011;Mahdid and Addar v. Austria (dec.), no. 74762\/01, 8 December 2005;Mogo\u015f v. Romania (dec.), no. 20420\/02, 6 May 2004;Mur\u0161i\u0107 v. Croatia [GC], no. 7334\/13, \u00a7\u00a7 96-97, 20 October 2016;Nolan and K. v. Russia, no. 2512\/04, \u00a7 93, 12 February 2009;Peers v. Greece, no. 28524\/95, \u00a7 74, ECHR 2001 III;Riad and Idiab v. Belgium, nos. 29787\/03 and 29810\/03, 24 January 2008;Shamsa v. Poland (dec.), nos. 45355\/99 and 45357\/99, 5 December 2002", "external_sources": "United Nations Convention relating to the Status of Refugees 1951;Chapter 5 of Annex 9 to the Chicago Convention on International Civil Aviation 2015\n", "conclusion": "Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Deprivation of liberty;Lawful arrest or detention;Article 5-1-f - Prevent unauthorised entry into country);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Alena Pol\u00e1\u010dkov\u00e1;Branko Lubarda;Dmitry Dedov;Georgios A. Serghides;Helen Keller;Helena J\u00e4derblom;Pere Pastor Vilanova", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0328JUD006141115" }, "102": { "webcast_id": "6141115_18042018", "hearing_date": "2018-04-18 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Z.A. and Others v. Russia (nos. 61411\/15, 61420\/15, 61427\/15 and 3028\/16)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "61411\/15", "case_id": "001-160017", "case_name": "Z.A. v. RUSSIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-160017", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "DAVIDIYAN E. ; TRENINA D.", "respondent": "RUS", "articles": "3;5;5-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Communicated", "separate_opinion": "", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "103": { "webcast_id": "6141115_18042018", "hearing_date": "2018-04-18 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Z.A. and Others v. Russia (nos. 61411\/15, 61420\/15, 61427\/15 and 3028\/16)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "61420\/15", "case_id": "001-198811", "case_name": "CASE OF Z.A. AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-198811", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2019-11-21 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "", "represented_by": "DAVIDYAN E. ; TRENINA D. ; ZHARINOV K.", "respondent": "RUS", "articles": "3;5;5-1;5-1-f;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "A.A. v. Greece, no. 12186\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 57-65, 22 July 2010;Abdi Mahamud v. Malta, no. 56796\/13, \u00a7\u00a7 89-90, 3 May 2016;Abdulaziz, Cabales and Balkandali v. the United Kingdom, 28 May 1985, \u00a7 67, Series A no. 94;Abdullahi Elmi and Aweys Abubakar v. Malta, nos. 25794\/13 and 28151\/13, \u00a7\u00a7 113-14, 22 November 2016;Abou Amer v. Romania, no. 14521\/03, \u00a7 39, 24 May 2011;Alimov v. Turkey, no. 14344\/13, \u00a7\u00a7 84-85, 6 September 2016;Amuur v. France, 25 June 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 III;Ananyev and Others v. Russia, nos. 42525\/07 and 60800\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 121-23, 10 January 2012;Boudraa v. Turkey, no. 1009\/16, \u00a7\u00a7 28-29, 28 November 2017;Buzadji v. Moldova [GC], no. 23755\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 106-10, 5 July 2016;Chahal v. the United Kingdom, 15 November 1996, \u00a7 73, Reports 1996 V;De Tommaso v. Italy [GC], no. 43395\/09, \u00a7 80, 23 February 2017;De Wilde, Ooms and Versyp v. Belgium, 18 June 1971, \u00a7 65, Series A no. 12;Dougoz v. Greece, no. 40907\/98, \u00a7 44, ECHR 2001 II;E.A. v. Greece, no. 74308\/10, \u00a7\u00a7 50-51, 30 July 2015;El-Masri v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia [GC], no. 39630\/09, \u00a7 230, ECHR 2012;Gahramanov v. Azerbaijan (dec.), no. 26291\/06, 15 October 2013;I.I. v. Bulgaria, no. 44082\/98, \u00a7\u00a7 84-87, 9 June 2005;Ilias and Ahmed v. Hungary [GC], no. 47287\/15, \u00a7\u00a7 244-46, 21 November 2019;Kaja v. Greece, no. 32927\/03, \u00a7\u00a7 45-46, 27 July 2006;Kanagaratnam v. Belgium, no. 15297\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 94-95, 13 December 2011;Kasparov v. Russia, no. 53659\/07, \u00a7 36, 11 October 2016;Khlaifia and Others v. Italy [GC], no. 16483\/12, 15 December 2016;Kud\u0142a v. Poland [GC], no. 30210\/96, \u00a7 94, ECHR 2000 XI;Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772\/95, \u00a7 119, ECHR 2000 IV;Longa Yonkeu v. Latvia, no. 57229\/09, \u00a7 131, 15 November 2011;M.S.S. v. Belgium and Greece, [GC], no. 30696\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 216-18, ECHR 2011;Mahamed Jama v. Malta, no. 10290\/13, \u00a7\u00a7 86-89, 26 November 2015;Mahdid and Haddar v. Austria (dec.), no. 74762\/01, ECHR 2005-XIII (extracts);Mogo\u015f v. Romania (dec.), no. 20420\/02, 6 May 2004;Mur\u0161i\u0107 v. Croatia [GC], no. 7334\/13, \u00a7 128, 20 October 2016;Nada v. Switzerland [GC], no. 10593\/08, \u00a7 225, ECHR 2012;Nolan and K. v. Russia, no. 2512\/04, \u00a7\u00a7 93-96, 12 February 2009;Osypenko v. Ukraine, no. 4634\/04, \u00a7 48, 9 November 2010;Rahimi v. Greece, no. 8687\/08, \u00a7 62, 5 April 2011;Rashed v. the Czech Republic, no. 298\/07, \u00a7 70, 27 November 2008;Riad and Idiab v. Belgium, nos. 29787\/03 and 29810\/03, 24 January 2008;S.D. v. Greece, no. 53541\/07, 11 June 2009;S.F. and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 8138\/16, \u00a7\u00a7 78-83, 7 December 2017;Saadi v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 13229\/03, ECHR 2008;Shamsa v. Poland, nos. 45355\/99 and 45357\/99, 27 November 2003;Shioshvili and Others v. Russia, no. 19356\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 83-86, 20 December 2016;Suso Musa v. Malta, no. 42337\/12, 23 July 2013;Tabesh v. Greece, no. 8256\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 38-44, 26 November 2009;Venskut\u0117 v. Lithuania, no. 10645\/08, \u00a7 72, 11 December 2012", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Deprivation of liberty;Article 5-1-f - Prevent unauthorised entry into country);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "FALSE", "judges": "Alena Pol\u00e1\u010dkov\u00e1;Ale\u0161 Pejchal;Andr\u00e9 Potocki;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Branko Lubarda;Dmitry Dedov;Georgios A. Serghides;Helen Keller;Helena J\u00e4derblom;Jon Fridrik Kj\u00f8lbro;Ledi Bianku;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;M\u0101rti\u0146\u0161 Mits;Neboj\u0161a Vu\u010dini\u0107;Paul Lemmens;Robert Spano;Yonko Grozev;Georges Ravarani;Ksenija Turkovi\u0107;Pere Pastor Vilanova", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1121JUD006141115" }, "104": { "webcast_id": "6141115_18042018", "hearing_date": "2018-04-18 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Z.A. and Others v. Russia (nos. 61411\/15, 61420\/15, 61427\/15 and 3028\/16)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "61420\/15", "case_id": "001-172107", "case_name": "CASE OF Z.A. AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-172107", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2017-03-28 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 3, "court": "6", "issue": "", "represented_by": "DAVIDYAN E. ; TRENINA D.", "respondent": "RUS", "articles": "3;5;5-1;5-1-f;41;46;46-2", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Abou Amer v. Romania, no. 14521\/03, \u00a7 37, 24 May 2011;Amuur v. France, 25 June 1996, \u00a7\u00a7 43-52, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 III;Ananyev and Others v. Russia, nos. 42525\/07 and 60800\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 121-123, 10 January 2012;Austin and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 39692\/09 and 2 others, \u00a7 58, ECHR 2012;El-Masri v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia [GC], no. 39630\/09, \u00a7 230, ECHR 2012;M.S.S. v. Belgium and Greece [GC], no. 30696\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 216-218, ECHR 2011;Mahdid and Addar v. Austria (dec.), no. 74762\/01, 8 December 2005;Mogo\u015f v. Romania (dec.), no. 20420\/02, 6 May 2004;Mur\u0161i\u0107 v. Croatia [GC], no. 7334\/13, \u00a7\u00a7 96-97, 20 October 2016;Nolan and K. v. Russia, no. 2512\/04, \u00a7 93, 12 February 2009;Peers v. Greece, no. 28524\/95, \u00a7 74, ECHR 2001 III;Riad and Idiab v. Belgium, nos. 29787\/03 and 29810\/03, 24 January 2008;Shamsa v. Poland (dec.), nos. 45355\/99 and 45357\/99, 5 December 2002", "external_sources": "United Nations Convention relating to the Status of Refugees 1951;Chapter 5 of Annex 9 to the Chicago Convention on International Civil Aviation 2015\n", "conclusion": "Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Deprivation of liberty;Lawful arrest or detention;Article 5-1-f - Prevent unauthorised entry into country);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Alena Pol\u00e1\u010dkov\u00e1;Branko Lubarda;Dmitry Dedov;Georgios A. Serghides;Helen Keller;Helena J\u00e4derblom;Pere Pastor Vilanova", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0328JUD006141115" }, "105": { "webcast_id": "6141115_18042018", "hearing_date": "2018-04-18 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Z.A. and Others v. Russia (nos. 61411\/15, 61420\/15, 61427\/15 and 3028\/16)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "61420\/15", "case_id": "001-160016", "case_name": "M.B. v. RUSSIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-160016", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "DAVIDIYAN E. ; TRENINA D.", "respondent": "RUS", "articles": "3;5;5-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Communicated", "separate_opinion": "", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "106": { "webcast_id": "6141115_18042018", "hearing_date": "2018-04-18 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Z.A. and Others v. Russia (nos. 61411\/15, 61420\/15, 61427\/15 and 3028\/16)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "61427\/15", "case_id": "001-198811", "case_name": "CASE OF Z.A. AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-198811", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2019-11-21 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "", "represented_by": "DAVIDYAN E. ; TRENINA D. ; ZHARINOV K.", "respondent": "RUS", "articles": "3;5;5-1;5-1-f;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "A.A. v. Greece, no. 12186\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 57-65, 22 July 2010;Abdi Mahamud v. Malta, no. 56796\/13, \u00a7\u00a7 89-90, 3 May 2016;Abdulaziz, Cabales and Balkandali v. the United Kingdom, 28 May 1985, \u00a7 67, Series A no. 94;Abdullahi Elmi and Aweys Abubakar v. Malta, nos. 25794\/13 and 28151\/13, \u00a7\u00a7 113-14, 22 November 2016;Abou Amer v. Romania, no. 14521\/03, \u00a7 39, 24 May 2011;Alimov v. Turkey, no. 14344\/13, \u00a7\u00a7 84-85, 6 September 2016;Amuur v. France, 25 June 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 III;Ananyev and Others v. Russia, nos. 42525\/07 and 60800\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 121-23, 10 January 2012;Boudraa v. Turkey, no. 1009\/16, \u00a7\u00a7 28-29, 28 November 2017;Buzadji v. Moldova [GC], no. 23755\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 106-10, 5 July 2016;Chahal v. the United Kingdom, 15 November 1996, \u00a7 73, Reports 1996 V;De Tommaso v. Italy [GC], no. 43395\/09, \u00a7 80, 23 February 2017;De Wilde, Ooms and Versyp v. Belgium, 18 June 1971, \u00a7 65, Series A no. 12;Dougoz v. Greece, no. 40907\/98, \u00a7 44, ECHR 2001 II;E.A. v. Greece, no. 74308\/10, \u00a7\u00a7 50-51, 30 July 2015;El-Masri v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia [GC], no. 39630\/09, \u00a7 230, ECHR 2012;Gahramanov v. Azerbaijan (dec.), no. 26291\/06, 15 October 2013;I.I. v. Bulgaria, no. 44082\/98, \u00a7\u00a7 84-87, 9 June 2005;Ilias and Ahmed v. Hungary [GC], no. 47287\/15, \u00a7\u00a7 244-46, 21 November 2019;Kaja v. Greece, no. 32927\/03, \u00a7\u00a7 45-46, 27 July 2006;Kanagaratnam v. Belgium, no. 15297\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 94-95, 13 December 2011;Kasparov v. Russia, no. 53659\/07, \u00a7 36, 11 October 2016;Khlaifia and Others v. Italy [GC], no. 16483\/12, 15 December 2016;Kud\u0142a v. Poland [GC], no. 30210\/96, \u00a7 94, ECHR 2000 XI;Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772\/95, \u00a7 119, ECHR 2000 IV;Longa Yonkeu v. Latvia, no. 57229\/09, \u00a7 131, 15 November 2011;M.S.S. v. Belgium and Greece, [GC], no. 30696\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 216-18, ECHR 2011;Mahamed Jama v. Malta, no. 10290\/13, \u00a7\u00a7 86-89, 26 November 2015;Mahdid and Haddar v. Austria (dec.), no. 74762\/01, ECHR 2005-XIII (extracts);Mogo\u015f v. Romania (dec.), no. 20420\/02, 6 May 2004;Mur\u0161i\u0107 v. Croatia [GC], no. 7334\/13, \u00a7 128, 20 October 2016;Nada v. Switzerland [GC], no. 10593\/08, \u00a7 225, ECHR 2012;Nolan and K. v. Russia, no. 2512\/04, \u00a7\u00a7 93-96, 12 February 2009;Osypenko v. Ukraine, no. 4634\/04, \u00a7 48, 9 November 2010;Rahimi v. Greece, no. 8687\/08, \u00a7 62, 5 April 2011;Rashed v. the Czech Republic, no. 298\/07, \u00a7 70, 27 November 2008;Riad and Idiab v. Belgium, nos. 29787\/03 and 29810\/03, 24 January 2008;S.D. v. Greece, no. 53541\/07, 11 June 2009;S.F. and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 8138\/16, \u00a7\u00a7 78-83, 7 December 2017;Saadi v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 13229\/03, ECHR 2008;Shamsa v. Poland, nos. 45355\/99 and 45357\/99, 27 November 2003;Shioshvili and Others v. Russia, no. 19356\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 83-86, 20 December 2016;Suso Musa v. Malta, no. 42337\/12, 23 July 2013;Tabesh v. Greece, no. 8256\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 38-44, 26 November 2009;Venskut\u0117 v. Lithuania, no. 10645\/08, \u00a7 72, 11 December 2012", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Deprivation of liberty;Article 5-1-f - Prevent unauthorised entry into country);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "FALSE", "judges": "Alena Pol\u00e1\u010dkov\u00e1;Ale\u0161 Pejchal;Andr\u00e9 Potocki;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Branko Lubarda;Dmitry Dedov;Georgios A. Serghides;Helen Keller;Helena J\u00e4derblom;Jon Fridrik Kj\u00f8lbro;Ledi Bianku;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;M\u0101rti\u0146\u0161 Mits;Neboj\u0161a Vu\u010dini\u0107;Paul Lemmens;Robert Spano;Yonko Grozev;Georges Ravarani;Ksenija Turkovi\u0107;Pere Pastor Vilanova", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1121JUD006141115" }, "107": { "webcast_id": "6141115_18042018", "hearing_date": "2018-04-18 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Z.A. and Others v. Russia (nos. 61411\/15, 61420\/15, 61427\/15 and 3028\/16)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "61427\/15", "case_id": "001-172107", "case_name": "CASE OF Z.A. AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-172107", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2017-03-28 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 3, "court": "6", "issue": "", "represented_by": "DAVIDYAN E. ; TRENINA D.", "respondent": "RUS", "articles": "3;5;5-1;5-1-f;41;46;46-2", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Abou Amer v. Romania, no. 14521\/03, \u00a7 37, 24 May 2011;Amuur v. France, 25 June 1996, \u00a7\u00a7 43-52, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 III;Ananyev and Others v. Russia, nos. 42525\/07 and 60800\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 121-123, 10 January 2012;Austin and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 39692\/09 and 2 others, \u00a7 58, ECHR 2012;El-Masri v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia [GC], no. 39630\/09, \u00a7 230, ECHR 2012;M.S.S. v. Belgium and Greece [GC], no. 30696\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 216-218, ECHR 2011;Mahdid and Addar v. Austria (dec.), no. 74762\/01, 8 December 2005;Mogo\u015f v. Romania (dec.), no. 20420\/02, 6 May 2004;Mur\u0161i\u0107 v. Croatia [GC], no. 7334\/13, \u00a7\u00a7 96-97, 20 October 2016;Nolan and K. v. Russia, no. 2512\/04, \u00a7 93, 12 February 2009;Peers v. Greece, no. 28524\/95, \u00a7 74, ECHR 2001 III;Riad and Idiab v. Belgium, nos. 29787\/03 and 29810\/03, 24 January 2008;Shamsa v. Poland (dec.), nos. 45355\/99 and 45357\/99, 5 December 2002", "external_sources": "United Nations Convention relating to the Status of Refugees 1951;Chapter 5 of Annex 9 to the Chicago Convention on International Civil Aviation 2015\n", "conclusion": "Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Deprivation of liberty;Lawful arrest or detention;Article 5-1-f - Prevent unauthorised entry into country);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Alena Pol\u00e1\u010dkov\u00e1;Branko Lubarda;Dmitry Dedov;Georgios A. Serghides;Helen Keller;Helena J\u00e4derblom;Pere Pastor Vilanova", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0328JUD006141115" }, "108": { "webcast_id": "6141115_18042018", "hearing_date": "2018-04-18 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Z.A. and Others v. Russia (nos. 61411\/15, 61420\/15, 61427\/15 and 3028\/16)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "61427\/15", "case_id": "001-160015", "case_name": "A.M. v. RUSSIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-160015", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "DAVIDIYAN E. ; TRENINA D.", "respondent": "RUS", "articles": "3;5;5-1-b", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Communicated", "separate_opinion": "", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "109": { "webcast_id": "6141115_18042018", "hearing_date": "2018-04-18 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Z.A. and Others v. Russia (nos. 61411\/15, 61420\/15, 61427\/15 and 3028\/16)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "3028\/16", "case_id": "001-198811", "case_name": "CASE OF Z.A. AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-198811", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2019-11-21 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "", "represented_by": "DAVIDYAN E. ; TRENINA D. ; ZHARINOV K.", "respondent": "RUS", "articles": "3;5;5-1;5-1-f;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "A.A. v. Greece, no. 12186\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 57-65, 22 July 2010;Abdi Mahamud v. Malta, no. 56796\/13, \u00a7\u00a7 89-90, 3 May 2016;Abdulaziz, Cabales and Balkandali v. the United Kingdom, 28 May 1985, \u00a7 67, Series A no. 94;Abdullahi Elmi and Aweys Abubakar v. Malta, nos. 25794\/13 and 28151\/13, \u00a7\u00a7 113-14, 22 November 2016;Abou Amer v. Romania, no. 14521\/03, \u00a7 39, 24 May 2011;Alimov v. Turkey, no. 14344\/13, \u00a7\u00a7 84-85, 6 September 2016;Amuur v. France, 25 June 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 III;Ananyev and Others v. Russia, nos. 42525\/07 and 60800\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 121-23, 10 January 2012;Boudraa v. Turkey, no. 1009\/16, \u00a7\u00a7 28-29, 28 November 2017;Buzadji v. Moldova [GC], no. 23755\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 106-10, 5 July 2016;Chahal v. the United Kingdom, 15 November 1996, \u00a7 73, Reports 1996 V;De Tommaso v. Italy [GC], no. 43395\/09, \u00a7 80, 23 February 2017;De Wilde, Ooms and Versyp v. Belgium, 18 June 1971, \u00a7 65, Series A no. 12;Dougoz v. Greece, no. 40907\/98, \u00a7 44, ECHR 2001 II;E.A. v. Greece, no. 74308\/10, \u00a7\u00a7 50-51, 30 July 2015;El-Masri v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia [GC], no. 39630\/09, \u00a7 230, ECHR 2012;Gahramanov v. Azerbaijan (dec.), no. 26291\/06, 15 October 2013;I.I. v. Bulgaria, no. 44082\/98, \u00a7\u00a7 84-87, 9 June 2005;Ilias and Ahmed v. Hungary [GC], no. 47287\/15, \u00a7\u00a7 244-46, 21 November 2019;Kaja v. Greece, no. 32927\/03, \u00a7\u00a7 45-46, 27 July 2006;Kanagaratnam v. Belgium, no. 15297\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 94-95, 13 December 2011;Kasparov v. Russia, no. 53659\/07, \u00a7 36, 11 October 2016;Khlaifia and Others v. Italy [GC], no. 16483\/12, 15 December 2016;Kud\u0142a v. Poland [GC], no. 30210\/96, \u00a7 94, ECHR 2000 XI;Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772\/95, \u00a7 119, ECHR 2000 IV;Longa Yonkeu v. Latvia, no. 57229\/09, \u00a7 131, 15 November 2011;M.S.S. v. Belgium and Greece, [GC], no. 30696\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 216-18, ECHR 2011;Mahamed Jama v. Malta, no. 10290\/13, \u00a7\u00a7 86-89, 26 November 2015;Mahdid and Haddar v. Austria (dec.), no. 74762\/01, ECHR 2005-XIII (extracts);Mogo\u015f v. Romania (dec.), no. 20420\/02, 6 May 2004;Mur\u0161i\u0107 v. Croatia [GC], no. 7334\/13, \u00a7 128, 20 October 2016;Nada v. Switzerland [GC], no. 10593\/08, \u00a7 225, ECHR 2012;Nolan and K. v. Russia, no. 2512\/04, \u00a7\u00a7 93-96, 12 February 2009;Osypenko v. Ukraine, no. 4634\/04, \u00a7 48, 9 November 2010;Rahimi v. Greece, no. 8687\/08, \u00a7 62, 5 April 2011;Rashed v. the Czech Republic, no. 298\/07, \u00a7 70, 27 November 2008;Riad and Idiab v. Belgium, nos. 29787\/03 and 29810\/03, 24 January 2008;S.D. v. Greece, no. 53541\/07, 11 June 2009;S.F. and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 8138\/16, \u00a7\u00a7 78-83, 7 December 2017;Saadi v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 13229\/03, ECHR 2008;Shamsa v. Poland, nos. 45355\/99 and 45357\/99, 27 November 2003;Shioshvili and Others v. Russia, no. 19356\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 83-86, 20 December 2016;Suso Musa v. Malta, no. 42337\/12, 23 July 2013;Tabesh v. Greece, no. 8256\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 38-44, 26 November 2009;Venskut\u0117 v. Lithuania, no. 10645\/08, \u00a7 72, 11 December 2012", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Deprivation of liberty;Article 5-1-f - Prevent unauthorised entry into country);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "FALSE", "judges": "Alena Pol\u00e1\u010dkov\u00e1;Ale\u0161 Pejchal;Andr\u00e9 Potocki;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Branko Lubarda;Dmitry Dedov;Georgios A. Serghides;Helen Keller;Helena J\u00e4derblom;Jon Fridrik Kj\u00f8lbro;Ledi Bianku;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;M\u0101rti\u0146\u0161 Mits;Neboj\u0161a Vu\u010dini\u0107;Paul Lemmens;Robert Spano;Yonko Grozev;Georges Ravarani;Ksenija Turkovi\u0107;Pere Pastor Vilanova", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1121JUD006141115" }, "110": { "webcast_id": "6141115_18042018", "hearing_date": "2018-04-18 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Z.A. and Others v. Russia (nos. 61411\/15, 61420\/15, 61427\/15 and 3028\/16)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "3028\/16", "case_id": "001-172107", "case_name": "CASE OF Z.A. AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-172107", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2017-03-28 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 3, "court": "6", "issue": "", "represented_by": "DAVIDYAN E. ; TRENINA D.", "respondent": "RUS", "articles": "3;5;5-1;5-1-f;41;46;46-2", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Abou Amer v. Romania, no. 14521\/03, \u00a7 37, 24 May 2011;Amuur v. France, 25 June 1996, \u00a7\u00a7 43-52, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 III;Ananyev and Others v. Russia, nos. 42525\/07 and 60800\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 121-123, 10 January 2012;Austin and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 39692\/09 and 2 others, \u00a7 58, ECHR 2012;El-Masri v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia [GC], no. 39630\/09, \u00a7 230, ECHR 2012;M.S.S. v. Belgium and Greece [GC], no. 30696\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 216-218, ECHR 2011;Mahdid and Addar v. Austria (dec.), no. 74762\/01, 8 December 2005;Mogo\u015f v. Romania (dec.), no. 20420\/02, 6 May 2004;Mur\u0161i\u0107 v. Croatia [GC], no. 7334\/13, \u00a7\u00a7 96-97, 20 October 2016;Nolan and K. v. Russia, no. 2512\/04, \u00a7 93, 12 February 2009;Peers v. Greece, no. 28524\/95, \u00a7 74, ECHR 2001 III;Riad and Idiab v. Belgium, nos. 29787\/03 and 29810\/03, 24 January 2008;Shamsa v. Poland (dec.), nos. 45355\/99 and 45357\/99, 5 December 2002", "external_sources": "United Nations Convention relating to the Status of Refugees 1951;Chapter 5 of Annex 9 to the Chicago Convention on International Civil Aviation 2015\n", "conclusion": "Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Deprivation of liberty;Lawful arrest or detention;Article 5-1-f - Prevent unauthorised entry into country);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Alena Pol\u00e1\u010dkov\u00e1;Branko Lubarda;Dmitry Dedov;Georgios A. Serghides;Helen Keller;Helena J\u00e4derblom;Pere Pastor Vilanova", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0328JUD006141115" }, "111": { "webcast_id": "6141115_18042018", "hearing_date": "2018-04-18 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Z.A. and Others v. Russia (nos. 61411\/15, 61420\/15, 61427\/15 and 3028\/16)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "3028\/16", "case_id": "001-160639", "case_name": "YASIEN v. RUSSIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-160639", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "", "respondent": "RUS", "articles": "3", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Communicated", "separate_opinion": "", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "112": { "webcast_id": "3692507_28032018", "hearing_date": "2018-03-28 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "G\u00fczelyurtlu and Others v. Cyprus and Turkey (no. 36925\/07)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "36925\/07", "case_id": "001-189781", "case_name": "CASE OF G\u00dcZELYURTLU AND OTHERS v. CYPRUS AND TURKEY", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-189781", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2019-01-29 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "", "represented_by": "RIZA A. ; MELEAGROU E.", "respondent": "CYP;TUR", "articles": "2;2-1;35;35-3-a;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Adali v. Turkey, no 38187\/97, 31 March 2005;Agache and Others v. Romania, no 2712\/02, 20 October 2009;Al-Adsani v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 35763\/97, ECHR 2001 XI;Al-Skeini and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 55721\/07, ECHR 2011;Aliyeva and Aliyev v. Azerbaijan, no 35587\/08, 31 July 2014;Armani Da Silva v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 5878\/08, \u00a7 233, 30 March 2016;Bakanova v. Lithuania, no 11167\/12, \u00a7 63, 31 May 2016;Catan and Others v. the Republic of Moldova and Russia [GC], nos. 43370\/04 and 2 others, ECHR 2012 (extracts);Cyprus v. Turkey [GC], no 25781\/94, ECHR 2001 IV;Cummins v. the United Kingdom, no 14549\/02, 1er April 2008;Demir and Baykara v. Turkey [GC], no 34503\/97, \u00a7\u00a7 65-86, ECHR 2008;Demopoulos and Others v. Turkey (dec.) [GC], nos. 46113\/99 and 7 others, ECHR 2010;Denisov v. Ukraine [GC], no 76639\/11, \u00a7 146, 25 September 2018;Emin and Others v. Greece, no 34144\/05, 27 March 2008;Foka v. Turkey, no 28940\/95, \u00a7\u00a7 83-84, 24 June 2008;Gray v. Germany no 49278\/09, 22 May 2014;Hasan v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 29750\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 74-80, ECHR 2014;Huseynova v. Azerbaijan, no 10653\/10, \u00a7 111, 13 April 2017;Ilascu and Others v. Moldova and Russia [GC], no 48787\/99, ECHR 2004 VII;Isaak v. Turkey, no 44587\/98, 24 June 2008;Isaak v. Turkey (dec.), no 44587\/98, 28 September 2006;Jaloud v. the Netherlands [GC], no 47708\/08, \u00a7 152, ECHR 2014;Janowiec and Others v. Russia [GC], nos. 55508\/07 and 29520\/09, \u00a7 132, ECHR 2013;Kakoulli v. Turkey, no 38595\/97, \u00a7 140, 22 November 2005;Loizidou v. Turkey (preliminary exceptions), 23 March 1995, Series A no 310;Lopes de Sousa Fernandes v. Portugal [GC], no 56080\/13, \u00a7 164, 19 December 2017;Magyar Helsinki Bizotts\u00e1g v. Hungary [GC], no 18030\/11, \u00a7 145, 8 November 2016;Margu\u0161 v. Croatia [GC], no 4455\/10, \u00a7 127, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Markovic and Others v. Italy [GC], no 1398\/03, ECHR 2006 XIV;Mohd v. Greece, no 11919\/03, \u00a7\u00a7 29-32, 27 April 2006;Mozer v. the Republic of Moldova and Russia [GC], no 11138\/10, 23 February 2016;Mustafa Tun\u00e7 and Fecire Tun\u00e7 v. Turkey [GC], no 24014\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 169-181, 14 April 2015;Nada v. Switzerland [GC], no 10593\/08, \u00a7 196, ECHR 2012;Nasr and Ghali v. Italy, no 44883\/09, 23 February 2016;Nje\u017eic and \u0160timac v. Croatia, no 29823\/13, 9 April 2015;O\u2019Loughlin and Others v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no 23274\/04, 25 August 2005;Palic v. Bosnia and Herzegovina, no 4704\/04, 15 February 2011;Protopapa v. Turkey, no 16084\/90, \u00a7\u00a7 60 and 83-89, 24 February 2009;Rantsev v. Cyprus and Russia, no 25965\/04, ECHR 2010 (extracts);\u0160ilih v. Slovenia [GC], no 71463\/01, \u00a7 159, 9 April 2009;Solomou and Others v. Turkey, no 36832\/97, \u00a7 101, 24 June 2008;X v. Latvia [GC], no 27853\/09, \u00a7 94, ECHR 2013", "external_sources": "Articles 12, 13 and 18 \u00a7\u00a7 1 and 2 of the European Convention on Extradition;Article 2 b) of the European Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters;United Nations Resolution A\/RES\/56\/83 on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts of 12 December 2001", "conclusion": "Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione loci;No violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect) (Cyprus);Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect) (Turkey);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Alena Pol\u00e1\u010dkov\u00e1;Ale\u0161 Pejchal;Andr\u00e1s Saj\u00f3;Andr\u00e9 Potocki;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Branko Lubarda;Ganna Yudkivska;Georgios A. Serghides;Guido Raimondi;Helen Keller;Helena J\u00e4derblom;Iulia Motoc;Kristina Pardalos;Krzysztof Wojtyczek;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Marko Bo\u0161njak;Pauliine Koskelo;Paulo Pinto De Albuquerque;Robert Spano;Vincent A. De Gaetano;Yonko Grozev;Gabriele Kucsko-Stadlmayer;Pere Pastor Vilanova", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0129JUD003692507" }, "113": { "webcast_id": "3692507_28032018", "hearing_date": "2018-03-28 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "G\u00fczelyurtlu and Others v. Cyprus and Turkey (no. 36925\/07)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "36925\/07", "case_id": "001-172460", "case_name": "CASE OF G\u00dcZELYURTLU AND OTHERS v. CYPRUS AND TURKEY", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-172460", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2017-04-04 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 2, "court": "6", "issue": "", "represented_by": "RIZA A. ; MELEAGROU E. ", "respondent": "CYP;TUR", "articles": "2;2-1;35;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Adal\u0131 v. Turkey, no. 38187\/97, \u00a7 186, 31 March 2005;Agache and Others v. Romania, no. 2712\/02, \u00a7 83, 20 October 2009;Aliyeva v. Azerbaijan, no. 35587\/08, 31 July 2014;Al-Skeini and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 55721\/07, \u00a7 130, ECHR 2011;Andreou v. Turkey (dec.), no. 45653\/99, 3 June 2008;Armani Da Silva v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 5878\/08, \u00a7 233, ECHR 2016;Ble\u010di\u0107 v. Croatia [GC], no. 59532\/00, \u00a7\u00a7 67-69, ECHR 2006 III;Catan and Others v. the Republic of Moldova and Russia [GC], nos. 43370\/04, 8252\/05 and 18454\/06, \u00a7 103, ECHR 2012 (extracts);Charalambous and Others v. Turkey (dec.), nos. 46744\/07 et al., \u00a7 64;Cummins and Others v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 27306\/05, 13 December 2005;Cyprus v. Turkey [GC], no. 25781\/94, \u00a7 77, ECHR 2001 IV;Demir and Baykara v. Turkey [GC], no. 34503\/97, \u00a7\u00a7 65-68, 12 November 2008;Demopoulos and Others v. Turkey (dec.) [GC], nos. 46113\/99, 3843\/02, 13751\/02, 13466\/03, 10200\/04, 14163\/04, 19993\/04 and 21819\/04, ECHR 2010;Emin and Others v. Cyprus (dec.), nos. 59623\/08, 3706\/09, 16206\/09, 25180\/09, 32744\/09, 36499\/09 and 57250\/09, 3 June 2010;Foka v. Turkey, no. 28940\/95, \u00a7\u00a7 83-84, 24 June 2008;Giuliani and Gaggio v. Italy [GC], no. 23458\/02, \u00a7 311, ECHR 2011 (extracts);Gray v. Germany, no. 49278\/09, 22 May 2014;G\u00fcrtekin and Others v. Cyprus, (dec.) nos. 60441\/13 et al., \u00a7 29, 11 March 2014;Ha\u00e1sz and Szab\u00f3 v. Hungary, nos. 11327\/14 and 11613\/14, \u00a7\u00a7 30-34, 13 October 2015;Hassan v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 29750\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 74-80, ECHR 2014;Ila\u015fcu and Others v. Moldova and Russia [GC], no. 48787\/99, \u00a7\u00a7 331-335, ECHR 2004 VII;J.-P.P v. France, no. 22123\/93, Commission decision of 31 August 1994, Decisions and Reports (DR). 79-B, p. 72;Jeli\u0107 v. Croatia, no. 57856\/11, \u00a7 64, 12 June 2014;Kallis and Androulla Panayi v. Turkey, no. 45388\/99, \u00a7 32, 27 October 2009;Kemevuako v. the Netherlands (dec.), no.65938\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 19-20, 1 June 2010;Khashiyev and Akayeva v. Russia, nos. 57942\/00 and 57945\/00, \u00a7\u00a7 119-121, 24 February 2005;Kyriacou Tsiakkourmas and Others v. Turkey, no. 13320\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 157-158, 2 June 2015;M.B. v. Romania, no. 43982\/06, \u00a7 64, 3 November 2011;McKerr v. the United Kingdom, no. 28883\/95, \u00a7\u00a7 121 and 156, ECHR 2001 III;Mihailov v. Bulgaria, no. 52367\/99, \u00a7 33, 21 July 2005;Mocanu and Others v. Romania [GC], nos. 10865\/09, 45886\/07 and 32431\/08, \u00a7 259, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Mustafa Tun\u00e7 and Fecire Tun\u00e7 v. Turkey [GC], no. 24014\/05, 14 April 2015;Nachova and Others v. Bulgaria [GC], nos. 43577\/98 and 43579\/98, ECHR 2005 VII;Nasr and Ghali v. Italy, no. 44883\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 270-272, 23 February 2016;Nee v. Gary (dec.), no. 52787\/99, 30 January 2003;Nje\u017ei\u0107 and \u0160timac v. Croatia, no. 29823\/13, 9 April 2015;O\u2019Loughlin and Others v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 23274\/04, 25 August 2005;Oliari and Others v. Italy, nos. 18766\/11 and 36030\/11, \u00a7 89, 21 July 2015;Pali\u0107 v. Bosnia and Herzegovina, no. 4704\/04, \u00a7 68, 15 February 2011;Paul and Audrey Edwards v. the United Kingdom, no. 46477\/99, \u00a7 86, ECHR 2002 II;Ramsahai and Others v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 52391\/99, \u00a7 347-8, ECHR 2007 II;Rantsev v. Cyprus and Russia, no. 25965\/04, ECHR 2010 (extracts);Trubnikov v. Russia, no. 49790\/99, \u00a7 92, 5 July 2005;Varnava and Others v. Turkey [GC], nos. 16064\/90, 16065\/90, 16066\/90, 16068\/90, 16069\/90, 16070\/90, 16071\/90, 16072\/90 and 16073\/90, \u00a7 158, ECHR 2009;Velcea and Maz\u0103re v. Romania, no. 64301\/01, \u00a7 113, 1 December 2009", "external_sources": "European Convention on Extradition of 13 December 1957, ratified by Turkey on 7 January 1960, entered into force in respect of Turkey on 18 April 1960;European Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters of 20 April 1959, ratified by Cyprus on 24 February 2000, entered into force on 24 May 2000;2005 UN Secretary-General\u2019s report on the UN operation in Cyprus", "conclusion": "Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2 - Positive obligations;Article 2-1 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect) (Cyprus);Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2 - Positive obligations;Article 2-1 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect) (Turkey);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Alena Pol\u00e1\u010dkov\u00e1;Branko Lubarda;Ganna Yudkivska;Georgios A. Serghides;Helen Keller;Helena J\u00e4derblom;Iulia Motoc;Pere Pastor Vilanova", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0404JUD003692507" }, "114": { "webcast_id": "3692507_28032018", "hearing_date": "2018-03-28 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "G\u00fczelyurtlu and Others v. Cyprus and Turkey (no. 36925\/07)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "36925\/07", "case_id": "001-113074", "case_name": "GUZELYURTLU AND OTHERS v. CYPRUS AND TURKEY", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-113074", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "2009-05-13 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "RIZA A. ; MELEAGROU E.", "respondent": "CYP", "articles": "2;13", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Communicated", "separate_opinion": "FALSE", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "115": { "webcast_id": "3648007_14032018", "hearing_date": "2018-03-14 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Leki\u0107 v. Slovenia (no. 36480\/07)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "36480\/07", "case_id": "001-188268", "case_name": "CASE OF LEKI\u0106 v. SLOVENIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-188268", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2018-12-11 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "OECD Benchmark Definition of Foreign Direct Investment, Fourth Edition 2008 ; IMF \u201cBalance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual\u201d, Sixth Edition (BPM6), 2009", "represented_by": "ZDOLSEK S. ; SACCUCI A.", "respondent": "SVN", "articles": "34;35;35-1;P1-1;P1-1-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Agrotexim and Others v. Greece, 24 October 1995, \u00a7 66, Series A no. 330-A;Ali\u0161i\u0107 and Others v. Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Serbia, Slovenia and the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia [GC], no. 60642\/08, ECHR 2014;Animal Defenders International v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 48876\/08, ECHR 2013;Azinas v. Cyprus [GC], no. 56679\/00, \u00a7 32, ECHR 2004 III;B\u00e9l\u00e1n\u00e9 Nagy v. Hungary [GC], no. 53080\/13, \u00a7\u00a7 113-14, 13 December 2016;Beyeler v. Italy [GC], no. 33202\/96, \u00a7\u00a7 109-10, ECHR 2000-I;Bladet Troms\u00f8 and Stensaas v. Norway [GC], no. 21980\/93, \u00a7 58, ECHR 1999 III;Broniowski v. Poland [GC], no. 31443\/96, ECHR 2004 V;Cantoni v. France, 15 November 1996, \u00a7 35, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 V;Capital Bank AD v. Bulgaria, no. 49429\/99, \u00a7 134, ECHR 2005-XII;Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin C\u00e2mpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848\/08, \u00a7 101, ECHR 2014;Centro Europa 7 S.r.1. and Di Stefano v. Italy [GC], no. 38433\/09, 7 June 2012;Correia de Matos v. Portugal [GC], no. 56402\/12, \u00a7 129, 4 April 2018;Former King of Greece and Others v. Greece [GC] (merits), no. 25701\/94, \u00a7 79, ECHR 2000 XII;Forminster Enterprises Limited v. the Czech Republic, no. 38238\/04, 9 October 2008;Garib v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 43494\/09, \u00a7 137, 6 November 2017;Hatton and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 36022\/97, \u00a7 97, ECHR 2003-VIII;Hennings v. Germany, 16 December 1992, \u00a7 26, Series A no. 251-A;J.A. Pye (Oxford) Ltd and J.A. Pye (Oxford) Land Ltd v. the United Kingdom, [GC], no. 44302\/02, ECHR 2007-III;Jahn and Others v. Germany, [GC], nos. 46720\/99 and 2 others, ECHR 2005 VI;Jeronovi\u010ds v. Latvia [GC], no. 44898\/10, \u00a7 75, 5 July 2016;Jokela v. Finland, no. 28856\/95, \u00a7 45, ECHR 2002-IV;K. and T. v. Finland [GC], no. 25702\/94, \u00a7\u00a7 140-41, ECHR 2001-VII;Kar\u00e1csony and Others v. Hungary [GC], nos. 42461\/13 and 44357\/13, \u00a7 125, 17 May 2016;Khodorkovskiy and Lebedev v. Russia, nos. 11082\/06 and 13772\/05, 25 July 2013;Kuri\u0107 and Others v. Slovenia [GC], no. 26828\/06, \u00a7 296, ECHR 2012;Lopes de Sousa Fernandes v. Portugal [GC], no. 56080\/13, \u00a7\u00a7 130-32, 19 December 2017;Miller v. Sweden, no. 55853\/00, \u00a7 29, 8 February 2005;Perin\u00e7ek v. Switzerland [GC], no. 27510\/08, \u00a7 136, ECHR 2015;Radomilja and Others v. Croatia [GC], no. 37685\/10, \u00a7 124, 20 March 2018;Roman Zakharov v. Russia [GC], no. 47143\/06, \u00a7 164, ECHR 2015;Sabri G\u00fcne\u015f v. Turkey [GC], no. 27396\/06, 29 June 2012;Salabiaku v. France, 7 October 1988, \u00a7 28, Series A no. 141 A;Sargsyan v. Azerbaijan [GC], no. 40167\/06, \u00a7 227, ECHR 2015;\u0160pa\u010dek, s.r.o., v. the Czech Republic, no. 26449\/95, \u00a7 59, 9 November 1999;Stolyarova v. Russia, no. 15711\/13, \u00a7 43, 29 January 2015;Vaskrsi\u0107 v. Slovenia, no. 31371\/12, 25 April 2017;V\u00e9kony v. Hungary, no. 65681\/13, \u00a7 34, 13 January 2015;Visti\u0146\u0161 and Perepjolkins v. Latvia [GC], no. 71243\/01, 25 October 2012;Zolotas v. Greece (no. 2), no. 66610\/09, ECHR 2013", "external_sources": "Section 27(4) of the Operations of Companies Act 1999 (in force from 23 July 1999 until 15 January 2008);Sections 6, 394(1) and 445 of the Companies Act 1993 (in force from 10 July 1993 until 4 May 2006)", "conclusion": "Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Six-month period;Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Victim;No violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Andr\u00e1s Saj\u00f3;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Bo\u0161tjan Zalar;Ganna Yudkivska;Guido Raimondi;Helen Keller;Iulia Motoc;Jon Fridrik Kj\u00f8lbro;Ledi Bianku;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Marko Bo\u0161njak;Nona Tsotsoria;Paul Lemmens;Paulo Pinto De Albuquerque;Robert Spano;St\u00e9phanie Mourou-Vikstr\u00f6m;Vincent A. De Gaetano;Gabriele Kucsko-Stadlmayer;Georges Ravarani;Ksenija Turkovi\u0107", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1211JUD003648007" }, "116": { "webcast_id": "3648007_14032018", "hearing_date": "2018-03-14 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Leki\u0107 v. Slovenia (no. 36480\/07)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "36480\/07", "case_id": "001-171087", "case_name": "CASE OF LEKI\u0106 v. SLOVENIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-171087", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2017-02-14 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 3, "court": "7", "issue": "Companies Act of 1993 ; Financial Operations of Companies Act of 1999\n", "represented_by": "ZDOLSEK S.", "respondent": "SVN", "articles": "35;P1-1;P1-1-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "A.N. v. Lithuania, no. 17280\/08, \u00a7 77, 31 May 2016;Agrotexim and Others v. Greece, 24 October 1995, \u00a7 66, Series A no. 330 A;Baghli v. France, no. 34374\/97, \u00a7 31, ECHR 1999 VIII;Beyeler v. Italy [GC], no. 33202\/96, \u00a7\u00a7 109-11, ECHR 2000-I;Ca\u00f1ete de Go\u00f1i v. Spain, no. 55782\/00, \u00a7 36, ECHR 2002-VIII;Cantoni v. France, 15 November 1996, \u00a7 35, Reports 1996-V;Capital Bank AD v. Bulgaria, no. 49429\/99, \u00a7\u00a7 132-34, ECHR 2005-XII (extracts);Company S. and T. v. Sweden, no. 11189\/84, Commission decision of 11 December 1986, DR 50, p. 138;Depalle v. France [GC], no. 34044\/02, \u00a7 77, ECHR 2010;Forminster Enterprises Limited v. the Czech Republic, no. 38238\/04, \u00a7 59, 9 October 2008;Forrer-Niedenthal v. Germany, no. 47316\/99, \u00a7 39, 20 February 2003;Fredin v. Sweden (no. 1), 18 February 1991, \u00a7 50, Series A no. 192;Guerra and Others v. Italy, 19 February 1998, \u00a7 44, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-I;Hasan and Chaush v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 30985\/96, \u00a7 84, ECHR 2000-XI;Hennings v. Germany, 16 December 1992, \u00a7 26, Series A no. 251-A;Hutten-Czapska v. Poland [GC], no. 35014\/97, \u00a7 165, ECHR 2006-VIII;Iatridis v. Greece [GC], no. 31107\/96, \u00a7 58, ECHR 1999-II;Jahn and Others v. Germany [GC], nos. 46720\/99, 72203\/01 and 72552\/01, \u00a7 91, ECHR 2005-VI;Jokela v. Finland, no. 28856\/95, \u00a7 45, ECHR 2002-IV;K.-H.W. v. Germany [GC], no. 37201\/97, \u00a7 73, ECHR 2001 II (extracts);Kuri\u0107 and Others v. Slovenia [GC], no. 26828\/06, \u00a7 296, ECHR 2012 (extracts);Olczak v. Poland (dec.), no. 30417\/96, ECHR 2002-X;Pokis v. Latvia (dec.), no. 528\/02, ECHR 2006-XV;S.C. Antares Transport S.A. and S.C. Transroby S.R.L. v. Romania, no. 27227\/08, \u00a7 46, 15 December 2015;Sovtransavto Holding v. Ukraine, no. 48553\/99, \u00a7 91, ECHR 2002-VII;Sporrong and L\u00f6nnroth v. Sweden, 23 September 1982, Series A no. 52;Stec and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 65731\/01, \u00a7 52, ECHR 2006 VI;Stolyarova v. Russia, no. 15711\/13, \u00a7 43, 29 January 2015;The Former King of Greece and Others v. Greece [GC], no. 25701\/94, ECHR 2000 XII;Vefa Holding Sh.p.k. and Alimu\u00e7aj v. Albania (dec.), no. 24096\/05, \u00a7 93, 14 June 2011;Visti\u0146\u0161 and Perepjolkins v. Latvia [GC], no. 71243\/01, \u00a7 98, 25 October 2012;Wittek v. Germany, no. 37290\/97, \u00a7 49, ECHR 2002-X", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Remainder inadmissible;No violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Deprivation of property;Peaceful enjoyment of possessions;Possessions)", "separate_opinion": "FALSE", "judges": "Andr\u00e1s Saj\u00f3;Bo\u0161tjan Zalar;Iulia Motoc;Marko Bo\u0161njak;Nona Tsotsoria;Paulo Pinto De Albuquerque;Vincent A. De Gaetano;Gabriele Kucsko-Stadlmayer", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0214JUD003648007" }, "117": { "webcast_id": "3648007_14032018", "hearing_date": "2018-03-14 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Leki\u0107 v. Slovenia (no. 36480\/07)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "36480\/07", "case_id": "001-115518", "case_name": "LEKI\u0106 v. SLOVENIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-115518", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "2012-11-28 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "N\/A", "respondent": "SVN", "articles": "6;13;P1-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "", "separate_opinion": "FALSE", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "118": { "webcast_id": "7810314_07032018", "hearing_date": "2018-03-07 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Fernandes de Oliveira v. Portugal (no. 78103\/14)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "78103\/14", "case_id": "001-189426", "case_name": "CASE OF FERNANDES DE OLIVEIRA v. PORTUGAL", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-189426", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2019-01-31 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Mental Health Act (Law no. 36\/98 of 24 July 1998) ; Guidelines of the Directorate General of Health on restraint no. 21\/2011 dated 6 June 2011 ; Article 2 \u00a7 2, c) of Regulatory Decree No. 66\/2007, of 29 May 2007, as amended by Regulatory Decree No. 21\/2008, of 2 December 2008\n", "represented_by": "PAIS DO AMARAL J. ; PEREIRA DE SOUSA A. ; BOTELHO C.", "respondent": "PRT", "articles": "2;2-1;35;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Bilbija and Bla\u017eevic v. Croatia, no 62870\/13, \u00a7 107, 12 January 2016;Calvelli and Ciglio v. Italy [GC], no 32967\/96, ECHR 2002 I;\u00c7oselav v. Turkey, no 1413\/07, \u00a7 57, 9 October 2012;De Donder and De Clippel v. Belgium, no 8595\/06, \u00a7 75, 6 December 2011;Dodov v. Bulgaria, no 59548\/00, \u00a7 80, 17 January 2008;Haas v. Switzerland, no 31322\/07, \u00a7 54, ECHR 2011;Hiller v. Austria, no 1967\/14, 22 November 2016;J.N. v. the United Kingdom, no 37289\/12, \u00a7 77, 19 May 2016;Keenan v. the United Kingdom, no 27229\/95, ECHR 2001 III;Ketreb v. France, no 38447\/09, \u00a7 78, 19 July 2012;Lopes de Sousa Fernandes v. Portugal [GC], no 56080\/13, 19 December 2017;Mitic v. Serbia, no 31963\/08, 22 January 2013;Osman v. the United Kingdom, 28 October 1998, \u00a7\u00a7 115-116, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 VIII;Radomilja and Others v. Croatia [GC], nos. 37685\/10 and 22768\/12, \u00a7 126, 20 March 2018;Renolde v. France, no 5608\/05, ECHR 2008 (extracts);Reynolds v. the United Kingdom, no 2694\/08, 13 March 2012;Sargsyan v. Azerbaijan (just satisfaction) [GC], no 40167\/06, \u00a7 61, 12 Decembre 2017;\u0160ilih v. Slovenia [GC], no 71463\/01, \u00a7196, 9 April 2009;Volk v. Slovenia, no 62120\/09, \u00a7 86, 13 December 2012;Younger v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no 57420\/00, ECHR 2003 I", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;No violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2 - Positive obligations;Article 2-1 - Life) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Alena Pol\u00e1\u010dkov\u00e1;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Armen Harutyunyan;Branko Lubarda;Carlo Ranzoni;Egidijus K\u016bris;Ganna Yudkivska;Guido Raimondi;Helena J\u00e4derblom;Krzysztof Wojtyczek;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Luis L\u00f3pez Guerra;Marko Bo\u0161njak;M\u0101rti\u0146\u0161 Mits;Nona Tsotsoria;Pauliine Koskelo;Paulo Pinto De Albuquerque;Robert Spano;S\u00edofra O'Leary;Yonko Grozev", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0131JUD007810314" }, "119": { "webcast_id": "7810314_07032018", "hearing_date": "2018-03-07 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Fernandes de Oliveira v. Portugal (no. 78103\/14)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "78103\/14", "case_id": "001-172329", "case_name": "CASE OF FERNANDES DE OLIVEIRA v. PORTUGAL", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-172329", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2017-03-28 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 3, "court": "7", "issue": "", "represented_by": "PAIS DO AMARAL J.", "respondent": "PRT", "articles": "2;2-1;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Calvelli and Ciglio v. Italy [GC], no. 32967\/96, \u00a7 49, ECHR 2002 I;Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin C\u00e2mpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848\/08, \u00a7 131, ECHR 2014;Dodov v. Bulgaria, no. 59548\/00, \u00a7 80, 17 January 2008;Editions Plon v. France, no. 58148\/00, \u00a7 64, ECHR 2004 IV;Guerra and Others v. Italy, 19 February 1998, \u00a7 44, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 I;Haas v. Switzerland, no. 31322\/07, \u00a7 54, ECHR 2011;Hiller v. Austria, no. 1967\/14, \u00a7\u00a7 52-53, 22 November 2016;Igor Shevchenko v. Ukraine, no. 22737\/04, \u00a7 60, 12 January 2012;Jagie\u0142\u0142o v. Poland (dec.) [Committee], no. 21782\/15, \u00a7 23, 24 January 2017;Keenan v. the United Kingdom, no. 27229\/95, \u00a7 111, ECHR 2001 III;Kudra v. Croatia, no. 13904\/07, \u00a7 113, 18 December 2012;L.C.B. v. the United Kingdom, 9 June 1998, \u00a7 36, Reports 1998 III;Paul and Audrey Edwards v. the United Kingdom, no. 46477\/99, \u00a7 86, ECHR 2002 II;Renolde v. France, no. 5608\/05, \u00a7 81, ECHR 2008 (extracts);Reynolds v. the United Kingdom, no. 2694\/08, 13 March 2012;Rivi\u00e8re v. France, no. 33834\/03, \u00a7 63, 11 July 2006;\u0160ilih v. Slovenia [GC], no. 71463\/01, \u00a7\u00a7 155 and 195, 9 April 2009;Tanr\u0131bilir v. Turkey, no. 21422\/93, \u00a7\u00a7 70-71, 16 November 2000", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2 - Positive obligations;Article 2-1 - Life) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "FALSE", "judges": "Egidijus K\u016bris;Ganna Yudkivska;Iulia Motoc;Krzysztof Wojtyczek;Marko Bo\u0161njak;Nona Tsotsoria;Paulo Pinto De Albuquerque", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0328JUD007810314" }, "120": { "webcast_id": "7810314_07032018", "hearing_date": "2018-03-07 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Fernandes de Oliveira v. Portugal (no. 78103\/14)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "78103\/14", "case_id": "001-160771", "case_name": "FERNANDES DE OLIVEIRA v. PORTUGAL", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-160771", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "PAIS DO AMARAL J.", "respondent": "PRT", "articles": "2;2-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Communicated", "separate_opinion": "", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "121": { "webcast_id": "3665805_14022018", "hearing_date": "2018-02-14 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Murtazaliyeva v. Russia (no. 36658\/05)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "36658\/05", "case_id": "001-187932", "case_name": "CASE OF MURTAZALIYEVA v. RUSSIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-187932", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2018-12-18 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Article 281 \u00a7 2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure "CCrP"", "represented_by": "KOROTEYEV K.N.", "respondent": "RUS", "articles": "6;6+6-3-b;6+6-3-d;6-1;6-3-b;6-3-d;35;35-3-a", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Al-Dulimi and Montana Management Inc. v. Switzerland [GC], no. 5809\/08, \u00a7 78, 21 June 2016;Al-Khawaja and Tahery v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 26766\/05 and 22228\/06, \u00a7 118, ECHR 2011;Andrey Zakharov v. Ukraine, no. 26581\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 61-62, 7 January 2016;Asci v. Austria (dec.), no. 4483\/02, 19 October 2006;Bocos-Cuesta v. the Netherlands, no. 54789\/00, \u00a7 66, 10 November 2005;Boldea v. Romania, no. 19997\/02, \u00a7 30, 15 February 2007;Bricmont v. Belgium, 7 July 1989, Series A no. 158;C.G.P. v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 29835\/96, 15 January 1997;Destrehem v. France, no. 56651\/00, \u00a7\u00a7 41-45, 18 May 2004;Dorokhov v. Russia, no. 66802\/01, \u00a7\u00a7 67-72, 14 February 2008;Dvorski v. Croatia [GC], no. 25703\/11, ECHR 2015;Engel and Others v. the Netherlands, 8 June 1976, \u00a7 91, Series A no. 22;Gabrielyan v. Armenia, no. 8088\/05, \u00a7 85, 10 April 2012;G\u00e4fgen v. Germany [GC], no. 22978\/05, \u00a7 162, ECHR 2010;Galstyan v. Armenia, no. 26986\/03, \u00a7 84, 15 November 2007;Giurgiu v. Romania (dec.), no. 26239\/09, \u00a7 99, 3 October 2017;Guilloury v. France, no. 62236\/00, \u00a7 55, 22 June 2006;Hermi v. Italy [GC], no. 18114\/02, \u00a7 79, ECHR 2006 XII;Ibrahim and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 50541\/08 and 3 others, \u00a7\u00a7 250-52, 13 September 2016;Ibrahimov and Others v. Azerbaijan, nos. 69234\/11 and 2 others, \u00a7 95, 11 February 2016;Janyr v. the Czech Republic, no. 42937\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 81-82, 31 October 2013;Khametshin v. Russia, no. 18487\/03, \u00a7 41, 4 March 2010;Lagutin and Others v. Russia, nos. 6228\/09 and 4 others, \u00a7 118, 24 April 2014;L\u00fcdi v. Switzerland, 15 June 1992, \u00a7 43, Series A no. 238;Makeyev v. Russia, no. 13769\/04, \u00a7 37, 5 February 2009;Miminoshvili v. Russia, no. 20197\/03, \u00a7 122, 28 June 2011;Nikolitsas v. Greece, no. 63117\/09, \u00a7 30, 3 July 2014;Palchik v. Ukraine, no. 16980\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 36-38, 2 March 2017;Pello v. Estonia, no. 11423\/03, \u00a7\u00a7 33-34, 12 April 2007;Perez v. France [GC], no. 47287\/99, \u00a7 54-56, ECHR 2004 I;Perna v. Italy ([GC], no. 48898\/99, \u00a7\u00a7 29-32, ECHR 2003 V;Poletan and Azirovik v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, no. 26711\/07 and 2 others, \u00a7 87, 12 May 2016;Polufakin and Chernyshev v. Russia, no. 30997\/02, \u00a7 207, 25 September 2008;Polyakov v. Russia, no. 77018\/01, \u00a7\u00a7 34-35, 29 January 2009;Popov v. Russia, no. 26853\/04, \u00a7 188, 13 July 2006;Regner v. the Czech Republic [GC], no. 35289\/11, \u00a7 97, 19 September 2017;Sakhnovskiy v. Russia [GC], no. 21272\/03, \u00a7\u00a7 91-92, 2 November 2010;Schatschaschwili v. Germany [GC] no. 9154\/10, \u00a7 101, ECHR 2015;Sergey Afanasyev v. Ukraine, no. 48057\/06, \u00a7 70, 15 November 2012;Shumeyev and Others v. Russia (dec.), no. 29474\/07 and 3 others, 22 September 2015;Simeonovi v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 21980\/04, \u00a7 113, 12 May 2017;Stanford v. the United Kingdom, 23 February 1994, \u00a7 26, Series A no. 282 A;Tarasov v. Ukraine, no. 17416\/03, \u00a7 105, 31 October 2013;Tar\u0103u v. Romania, no. 3584\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 74-76, 24 February 2009;Taxquet v. Belgium [GC], no. 926\/05, \u00a7 84, ECHR 2010;Topi\u0107 v. Croatia, no. 51355\/10, \u00a7 42, 10 October 2013;Tseber v. the Czech Republic, no. 46203\/08, \u00a7 42, 22 November 2012;Tymchenko v. Ukraine, no. 47351\/06, \u00a7 92, 13 October 2016;Vacher v. France, 17 December 1996, \u00a7 22, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-VI;Van de Hurk v. the Netherlands, 19 April 1994, \u00a7 61, Series A no. 288;Van Mechelen and Others v. the Netherlands, 23 April 1997, \u00a7 50, Reports 1997 III;;Vidal v. Belgium, 22 April 1992, \u00a7 33, Series A no. 235 B;Vu\u010dkovi\u0107 and Others v. Serbia (preliminary objection) [GC], nos. 17153\/11 and 29 others, \u00a7 56, 25 March 2014;Zahirovi\u0107 v. Croatia, no. 58590\/11, \u00a7 42, 25 April 2013", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Preliminary objection allowed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;No violation of Article 6+6-3-b - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing) (Article 6 - Right to a fair trial;Article 6-3-b - Adequate facilities);No violation of Article 6+6-3-d - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing) (Article 6 - Right to a fair trial;Article 6-3-d - Obtain attendance of witnesses)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Alena Pol\u00e1\u010dkov\u00e1;Andr\u00e9 Potocki;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Armen Harutyunyan;Branko Lubarda;Carlo Ranzoni;Dmitry Dedov;Erik M\u00f8se;Ganna Yudkivska;Georgios A. Serghides;Guido Raimondi;Helen Keller;Helena J\u00e4derblom;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Luis L\u00f3pez Guerra;Marko Bo\u0161njak;Paulo Pinto De Albuquerque;Robert Spano;Georges Ravarani;Tim Eicke", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1218JUD003665805" }, "122": { "webcast_id": "3665805_14022018", "hearing_date": "2018-02-14 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Murtazaliyeva v. Russia (no. 36658\/05)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "36658\/05", "case_id": "001-173463", "case_name": "CASE OF MURTAZALIYEVA v. RUSSIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-173463", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2017-05-09 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "6", "issue": "", "represented_by": "KOROTEYEV K.", "respondent": "RUS", "articles": "6;6+6-3-b;6+6-3-d;6-3-b;6-3-d", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "No violation of Article 6+6-3-b - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings) (Article 6 - Right to a fair trial;Criminal proceedings;Article 6-3-b - Access to relevant files);No violation of Article 6+6-3-d - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings) (Article 6 - Right to a fair trial;Article 6-3-d - Obtain attendance of witnesses)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Alena Pol\u00e1\u010dkov\u00e1;Branko Lubarda;Dmitry Dedov;Georgios A. Serghides;Helen Keller;Helena J\u00e4derblom;Luis L\u00f3pez Guerra", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0509JUD003665805" }, "123": { "webcast_id": "2958012_24012018", "hearing_date": "2018-01-24 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Navalnyy v. Russia (nos. 29580\/12, 36847\/12, 11252\/13, 12317\/13 and 43746\/14)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "29580\/12", "case_id": "001-187605", "case_name": "CASE OF NAVALNYY v. RUSSIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-187605", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2018-11-15 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Sections 2, 5, 7 and 16 of the Federal Law no. 54-FZ of 19 June 2004 on Gatherings, Meetings, Demonstrations, Processions and Pickets, (\u201c the Public Events Act\u201d ) ; Articles 19 \u00a7 3 and 20 \u00a7 2 of the Code of Administrative Offences ; Law no. 65-FZ of 8 June 2012 amending the Code of Administrative Offences ", "represented_by": "MIKHAYLOVA O. ; TEREKHOV K. ; MARALYAN A. ; MOSKALENKO K.", "respondent": "RUS", "articles": "5;5-1;6;6-1;11;11-1;11-2;18;18+11-1;18+5-1;35;35-1;41;46;46-2", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Alekseyev v. Russia, nos. 4916\/07, 25924\/08 and 14599\/09, 21 October 2010;Barankevich v. Russia, no. 10519\/03, \u00a7 28, 26 July 2007;Berladir and Others v. Russia, no. 34202\/06, \u00a7 39, 10 July 2012;Ble\u010di\u0107 v. Croatia [GC], no. 59532\/00, \u00a7 65, ECHR 2006 III;Blokhin v. Russia [GC], no. 47152\/06, ECHR 2016;Broniowski v. Poland [GC], no. 31443\/96, \u00a7 192, ECHR 2004-V;Bukta and Others v. Hungary, no. 25691\/04, \u00a7 37, ECHR 2007 III;Buzadji v. the Republic of Moldova [GC], no. 23755\/07, ECHR 2016 (extracts);Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin C\u00e2mpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848\/08, \u00a7 158, ECHR 2014;Ceylan v. Turkey [GC], no. 23556\/94, \u00a7 34, ECHR 1999 IV;Cump\u01cen\u01ce and Maz\u01cere v. Romania [GC], no. 33348\/96, ECHR 2004 XI;Demicoli v. Malta, 27 August 1991, \u00a7\u00a7 31-34, Series A no. 210;Engel and Others v. the Netherlands, 8 June 1976, \u00a7\u00a7 82 83, Series A no. 22;Ezeh and Connors v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 39665\/98 and 40086\/98, ECHR 2003 X;Ezelin v. France, 26 April 1991, Series A no. 202;F\u00e1ber v. Hungary, no. 40721\/08, \u00a7 47, 24 July 2012;F\u00e1bi\u00e1n v. Hungary [GC], no. 78117\/13, \u00a7 90, ECHR 2017 (extracts);Gorzelik and Others v. Poland [GC], no. 44158\/98, \u00a7 90, ECHR 2004 I;Hasan and Chaush v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 30985\/96, \u00a7 84, ECHR 2000 XI;Jussila v. Finland [GC], no. 73053\/01, ECHR 2006 XIV;K. and T. v. Finland [GC], no. 25702\/94, ECHR 2001-VII;Kar\u00e1csony and Others v. Hungary [GC], nos. 42461\/13 and 44357\/13, ECHR 2016 (extracts);Kasparov and Others v. Russia (no. 2), no. 51988\/07, 13 December 2016;Kudrevi\u010dius and Others v. Lithuania [GC], no. 37553\/05, ECHR 2015;Lashmankin and Others v. Russia, nos. 57818\/09 and 14 others, \u00a7\u00a7 216-312, 7 February 2017;Leyla \u015eahin v. Turkey [GC], no. 44774\/98, ECHR 2005 XI;Maestri v. Italy [GC], no. 39748\/98, \u00a7 30, ECHR 2004 I;Magyar Helsinki Bizotts\u00e1g v. Hungary [GC], no. 18030\/11, \u00a7 163, ECHR 2016;Makhmudov v. Russia, no. 35082\/04, 26 July 2007;Malofeyeva v. Russia, no. 36673\/04, 30 May 2013;Menesheva v. Russia, no. 59261\/00, \u00a7\u00a7 95-98, ECHR 2006 III;Merabishvili v. Georgia [GC], no. 72508\/13, 28 November 2017;Mikhaylova v. Russia, no. 46998\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 57-69, 19 November 2015;Mouvement ra\u00eblien suisse v. Switzerland [GC], no. 16354\/06, \u00a7 61, ECHR 2012 (extracts);Navalnyy and Ofitserov v. Russia, nos. 46632\/13 and 28671\/14, \u00a7 119, 23 February 2016;Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204\/11, \u00a7\u00a7 43-44, 4 December 2014;Navalnyye v. Russia, no. 101\/15, \u00a7\u00a7 83-84, 17 October 2017;Nemtsov v. Russia, no. 1774\/11, 31 July 2014;O\u0308ztu\u0308rk v. Germany, 21 February 1984, \u00a7 50, Series A no. 73;Perin\u00e7ek v. Switzerland [GC], no. 27510\/08, ECHR 2015;Pine Valley Developments Ltd and Others v. Ireland, 29 November 1991, \u00a7 45, Series A no. 222;Primov and Others v. Russia, no. 17391\/06, 12 June 2014;Radomilja and Others v. Croatia [GC], nos. 37685\/10 and 22768\/12, ECHR 2018;Roman Zakharov v. Russia [GC], no. 47143\/06, \u00a7 232, ECHR 2015;Sam\u00fct Karabulut v. Turkey, no. 16999\/04, \u00a7 35, 27 January 2009;Scozzari and Giunta v. Italy [GC], nos. 39221\/98 and 41963\/98, \u00a7 249, ECHR 2000 VIII;Sergey Kuznetsov v. Russia, no. 10877\/04, 23 October 2008;Simeonovi v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 21980\/04, ECHR 2017 (extracts);Stanev v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 36760\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 254-55, ECHR 2012;Stankov and the United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden v. Bulgaria, nos. 29221\/95 and 29225\/95, \u00a7 85, ECHR 2001 IX;Stec and Others v. the United Kingdom (dec.) [GC], nos. 65731\/01 and 65900\/01, \u00a7 48, ECHR 2005 X;Svinarenko and Slyadnev v. Russia [GC], nos. 32541\/08 and 43441\/08, \u00a7 79, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Taranenko v. Russia, no. 19554\/05, \u00a7 65, 15 May 2014;Young, James and Webster v. the United Kingdom, 13 August 1981, \u00a7 63, Series A no. 44;\u017ddanoka v. Latvia [GC], no. 58278\/00, \u00a7 98, ECHR 2006 IV", "external_sources": "Decision of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on the execution of the judgement in Lashmankin and Others v. Russian Federation (Application No. 57818\/09), adopted on 7 June 2018 at its 1318th meeting, CM\/Del\/Dec(2018)1318\/H46-21;Follow-up Memorandum of the Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights on Freedom of Assembly in the Russian Federation, dated 5 September 2017", "conclusion": "Preliminary objections dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Six-month period;Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention);No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Administrative proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Administrative proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing);Violation of Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association (Article 11-1 - Freedom of peaceful assembly);Violation of Article 18+5-1 - Limitation on use of restrictions on rights (Article 18 - Restrictions for unauthorised purposes) (Article 5 - Right to liberty and security;Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention);Violation of Article 18+11-1 - Limitation on use of restrictions on rights (Article 18 - Restrictions for unauthorised purposes) (Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association;Article 11-1 - Freedom of peaceful assembly);Pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Respondent State to take measures of a general character (Article 46-2 - General measures)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Alena Pol\u00e1\u010dkov\u00e1;Ale\u0161 Pejchal;Andr\u00e9 Potocki;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Armen Harutyunyan;Branko Lubarda;Dmitry Dedov;Ganna Yudkivska;Guido Raimondi;Helen Keller;Helena J\u00e4derblom;Ledi Bianku;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Luis L\u00f3pez Guerra;Pauliine Koskelo;Robert Spano;Georges Ravarani;Pere Pastor Vilanova", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1115JUD002958012" }, "124": { "webcast_id": "2958012_24012018", "hearing_date": "2018-01-24 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Navalnyy v. Russia (nos. 29580\/12, 36847\/12, 11252\/13, 12317\/13 and 43746\/14)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "29580\/12", "case_id": "001-170655", "case_name": "CASE OF NAVALNYY v. RUSSIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-170655", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2017-02-02 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 3, "court": "6", "issue": "Articles 19.3, 27.2 and 27.3 of the Code of the Administrative Offences", "represented_by": "TEREKHOV K. ; MIKHAYLOVA O.", "respondent": "RUS", "articles": "5;5-1;6;6-1;11;11-1;11-2;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Berladir and Others v. Russia, no. 34202\/06, \u00a7 38, 10 July 2012;Bukta and Others v. Hungary, no. 25691\/04, \u00a7 34, ECHR 2007 III;Ezelin v. France, 26 April 1991, \u00a7 37, Series A no. 202;F\u00e1ber v. Hungary, no. 40721\/08, \u00a7 49, 24 July 2012;Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568\/12, 5 January 2016;Giulia Manzoni v. Italy, 1 July 1997, \u00a7 25, Reports 1997 IV;Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613\/07, 3 October 2013;Kudrevi\u010dius and Others v. Lithuania [GC], no. 37553\/05, ECHR 2015;Malofeyeva v. Russia, no. 36673\/04, 30 May 2013;Mikhaylova v. Russia, no. 46998\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 57-69, 19 November 2015;Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204\/11, 4 December 2014;Nemtsov v. Russia, no. 1774\/11, \u00a7 83, 31 July 2014;;Novikova and Others v. Russia, nos. 25501\/07, 57569\/11, 80153\/12, 5790\/13 and 35015\/13, 26 April 2016;Oya Ataman v. Turkey, no. 74552\/01, \u00a7 42, ECHR 2006 XIV;Schwabe and M.G. v. Germany, nos. 8080\/08 and 8577\/08, \u00a7 101, ECHR 2011 (extracts);Volkov and Adamskiy v. Russia, nos. 7614\/09 and 30863\/10, \u00a7\u00a7 68 and 71, 26 March 2015", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Violation of Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association (Article 11-1 - Freedom of peaceful assembly);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention);No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Administrative proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Administrative proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing);Pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Alena Pol\u00e1\u010dkov\u00e1;Branko Lubarda;Dmitry Dedov;Helen Keller;Helena J\u00e4derblom;Luis L\u00f3pez Guerra;Pere Pastor Vilanova", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0202JUD002958012" }, "125": { "webcast_id": "2958012_24012018", "hearing_date": "2018-01-24 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Navalnyy v. Russia (nos. 29580\/12, 36847\/12, 11252\/13, 12317\/13 and 43746\/14)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "29580\/12", "case_id": "001-146460", "case_name": "NAVALNYY v. RUSSIA and 4 other applications", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-146460", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "TEREKHOV K. I. ; MIKHAYLOVA O. O.", "respondent": "RUS", "articles": "3;5;5-1;5-1-c;6;6-1;6-3-b;6-3-c;6-3-d;10;10-1;10-2;11;11-1;11-2", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Communicated", "separate_opinion": "", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "126": { "webcast_id": "2958012_24012018", "hearing_date": "2018-01-24 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Navalnyy v. Russia (nos. 29580\/12, 36847\/12, 11252\/13, 12317\/13 and 43746\/14)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "36847\/12", "case_id": "001-187605", "case_name": "CASE OF NAVALNYY v. RUSSIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-187605", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2018-11-15 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Sections 2, 5, 7 and 16 of the Federal Law no. 54-FZ of 19 June 2004 on Gatherings, Meetings, Demonstrations, Processions and Pickets, (\u201c the Public Events Act\u201d ) ; Articles 19 \u00a7 3 and 20 \u00a7 2 of the Code of Administrative Offences ; Law no. 65-FZ of 8 June 2012 amending the Code of Administrative Offences ", "represented_by": "MIKHAYLOVA O. ; TEREKHOV K. ; MARALYAN A. ; MOSKALENKO K.", "respondent": "RUS", "articles": "5;5-1;6;6-1;11;11-1;11-2;18;18+11-1;18+5-1;35;35-1;41;46;46-2", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Alekseyev v. Russia, nos. 4916\/07, 25924\/08 and 14599\/09, 21 October 2010;Barankevich v. Russia, no. 10519\/03, \u00a7 28, 26 July 2007;Berladir and Others v. Russia, no. 34202\/06, \u00a7 39, 10 July 2012;Ble\u010di\u0107 v. Croatia [GC], no. 59532\/00, \u00a7 65, ECHR 2006 III;Blokhin v. Russia [GC], no. 47152\/06, ECHR 2016;Broniowski v. Poland [GC], no. 31443\/96, \u00a7 192, ECHR 2004-V;Bukta and Others v. Hungary, no. 25691\/04, \u00a7 37, ECHR 2007 III;Buzadji v. the Republic of Moldova [GC], no. 23755\/07, ECHR 2016 (extracts);Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin C\u00e2mpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848\/08, \u00a7 158, ECHR 2014;Ceylan v. Turkey [GC], no. 23556\/94, \u00a7 34, ECHR 1999 IV;Cump\u01cen\u01ce and Maz\u01cere v. Romania [GC], no. 33348\/96, ECHR 2004 XI;Demicoli v. Malta, 27 August 1991, \u00a7\u00a7 31-34, Series A no. 210;Engel and Others v. the Netherlands, 8 June 1976, \u00a7\u00a7 82 83, Series A no. 22;Ezeh and Connors v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 39665\/98 and 40086\/98, ECHR 2003 X;Ezelin v. France, 26 April 1991, Series A no. 202;F\u00e1ber v. Hungary, no. 40721\/08, \u00a7 47, 24 July 2012;F\u00e1bi\u00e1n v. Hungary [GC], no. 78117\/13, \u00a7 90, ECHR 2017 (extracts);Gorzelik and Others v. Poland [GC], no. 44158\/98, \u00a7 90, ECHR 2004 I;Hasan and Chaush v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 30985\/96, \u00a7 84, ECHR 2000 XI;Jussila v. Finland [GC], no. 73053\/01, ECHR 2006 XIV;K. and T. v. Finland [GC], no. 25702\/94, ECHR 2001-VII;Kar\u00e1csony and Others v. Hungary [GC], nos. 42461\/13 and 44357\/13, ECHR 2016 (extracts);Kasparov and Others v. Russia (no. 2), no. 51988\/07, 13 December 2016;Kudrevi\u010dius and Others v. Lithuania [GC], no. 37553\/05, ECHR 2015;Lashmankin and Others v. Russia, nos. 57818\/09 and 14 others, \u00a7\u00a7 216-312, 7 February 2017;Leyla \u015eahin v. Turkey [GC], no. 44774\/98, ECHR 2005 XI;Maestri v. Italy [GC], no. 39748\/98, \u00a7 30, ECHR 2004 I;Magyar Helsinki Bizotts\u00e1g v. Hungary [GC], no. 18030\/11, \u00a7 163, ECHR 2016;Makhmudov v. Russia, no. 35082\/04, 26 July 2007;Malofeyeva v. Russia, no. 36673\/04, 30 May 2013;Menesheva v. Russia, no. 59261\/00, \u00a7\u00a7 95-98, ECHR 2006 III;Merabishvili v. Georgia [GC], no. 72508\/13, 28 November 2017;Mikhaylova v. Russia, no. 46998\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 57-69, 19 November 2015;Mouvement ra\u00eblien suisse v. Switzerland [GC], no. 16354\/06, \u00a7 61, ECHR 2012 (extracts);Navalnyy and Ofitserov v. Russia, nos. 46632\/13 and 28671\/14, \u00a7 119, 23 February 2016;Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204\/11, \u00a7\u00a7 43-44, 4 December 2014;Navalnyye v. Russia, no. 101\/15, \u00a7\u00a7 83-84, 17 October 2017;Nemtsov v. Russia, no. 1774\/11, 31 July 2014;O\u0308ztu\u0308rk v. Germany, 21 February 1984, \u00a7 50, Series A no. 73;Perin\u00e7ek v. Switzerland [GC], no. 27510\/08, ECHR 2015;Pine Valley Developments Ltd and Others v. Ireland, 29 November 1991, \u00a7 45, Series A no. 222;Primov and Others v. Russia, no. 17391\/06, 12 June 2014;Radomilja and Others v. Croatia [GC], nos. 37685\/10 and 22768\/12, ECHR 2018;Roman Zakharov v. Russia [GC], no. 47143\/06, \u00a7 232, ECHR 2015;Sam\u00fct Karabulut v. Turkey, no. 16999\/04, \u00a7 35, 27 January 2009;Scozzari and Giunta v. Italy [GC], nos. 39221\/98 and 41963\/98, \u00a7 249, ECHR 2000 VIII;Sergey Kuznetsov v. Russia, no. 10877\/04, 23 October 2008;Simeonovi v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 21980\/04, ECHR 2017 (extracts);Stanev v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 36760\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 254-55, ECHR 2012;Stankov and the United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden v. Bulgaria, nos. 29221\/95 and 29225\/95, \u00a7 85, ECHR 2001 IX;Stec and Others v. the United Kingdom (dec.) [GC], nos. 65731\/01 and 65900\/01, \u00a7 48, ECHR 2005 X;Svinarenko and Slyadnev v. Russia [GC], nos. 32541\/08 and 43441\/08, \u00a7 79, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Taranenko v. Russia, no. 19554\/05, \u00a7 65, 15 May 2014;Young, James and Webster v. the United Kingdom, 13 August 1981, \u00a7 63, Series A no. 44;\u017ddanoka v. Latvia [GC], no. 58278\/00, \u00a7 98, ECHR 2006 IV", "external_sources": "Decision of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on the execution of the judgement in Lashmankin and Others v. Russian Federation (Application No. 57818\/09), adopted on 7 June 2018 at its 1318th meeting, CM\/Del\/Dec(2018)1318\/H46-21;Follow-up Memorandum of the Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights on Freedom of Assembly in the Russian Federation, dated 5 September 2017", "conclusion": "Preliminary objections dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Six-month period;Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention);No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Administrative proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Administrative proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing);Violation of Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association (Article 11-1 - Freedom of peaceful assembly);Violation of Article 18+5-1 - Limitation on use of restrictions on rights (Article 18 - Restrictions for unauthorised purposes) (Article 5 - Right to liberty and security;Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention);Violation of Article 18+11-1 - Limitation on use of restrictions on rights (Article 18 - Restrictions for unauthorised purposes) (Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association;Article 11-1 - Freedom of peaceful assembly);Pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Respondent State to take measures of a general character (Article 46-2 - General measures)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Alena Pol\u00e1\u010dkov\u00e1;Ale\u0161 Pejchal;Andr\u00e9 Potocki;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Armen Harutyunyan;Branko Lubarda;Dmitry Dedov;Ganna Yudkivska;Guido Raimondi;Helen Keller;Helena J\u00e4derblom;Ledi Bianku;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Luis L\u00f3pez Guerra;Pauliine Koskelo;Robert Spano;Georges Ravarani;Pere Pastor Vilanova", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1115JUD002958012" }, "127": { "webcast_id": "2958012_24012018", "hearing_date": "2018-01-24 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Navalnyy v. Russia (nos. 29580\/12, 36847\/12, 11252\/13, 12317\/13 and 43746\/14)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "36847\/12", "case_id": "001-170655", "case_name": "CASE OF NAVALNYY v. RUSSIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-170655", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2017-02-02 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 3, "court": "6", "issue": "Articles 19.3, 27.2 and 27.3 of the Code of the Administrative Offences", "represented_by": "TEREKHOV K. ; MIKHAYLOVA O.", "respondent": "RUS", "articles": "5;5-1;6;6-1;11;11-1;11-2;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Berladir and Others v. Russia, no. 34202\/06, \u00a7 38, 10 July 2012;Bukta and Others v. Hungary, no. 25691\/04, \u00a7 34, ECHR 2007 III;Ezelin v. France, 26 April 1991, \u00a7 37, Series A no. 202;F\u00e1ber v. Hungary, no. 40721\/08, \u00a7 49, 24 July 2012;Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568\/12, 5 January 2016;Giulia Manzoni v. Italy, 1 July 1997, \u00a7 25, Reports 1997 IV;Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613\/07, 3 October 2013;Kudrevi\u010dius and Others v. Lithuania [GC], no. 37553\/05, ECHR 2015;Malofeyeva v. Russia, no. 36673\/04, 30 May 2013;Mikhaylova v. Russia, no. 46998\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 57-69, 19 November 2015;Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204\/11, 4 December 2014;Nemtsov v. Russia, no. 1774\/11, \u00a7 83, 31 July 2014;;Novikova and Others v. Russia, nos. 25501\/07, 57569\/11, 80153\/12, 5790\/13 and 35015\/13, 26 April 2016;Oya Ataman v. Turkey, no. 74552\/01, \u00a7 42, ECHR 2006 XIV;Schwabe and M.G. v. Germany, nos. 8080\/08 and 8577\/08, \u00a7 101, ECHR 2011 (extracts);Volkov and Adamskiy v. Russia, nos. 7614\/09 and 30863\/10, \u00a7\u00a7 68 and 71, 26 March 2015", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Violation of Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association (Article 11-1 - Freedom of peaceful assembly);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention);No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Administrative proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Administrative proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing);Pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Alena Pol\u00e1\u010dkov\u00e1;Branko Lubarda;Dmitry Dedov;Helen Keller;Helena J\u00e4derblom;Luis L\u00f3pez Guerra;Pere Pastor Vilanova", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0202JUD002958012" }, "128": { "webcast_id": "2958012_24012018", "hearing_date": "2018-01-24 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Navalnyy v. Russia (nos. 29580\/12, 36847\/12, 11252\/13, 12317\/13 and 43746\/14)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "36847\/12", "case_id": "001-146460", "case_name": "NAVALNYY v. RUSSIA and 4 other applications", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-146460", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "TEREKHOV K. I. ; MIKHAYLOVA O. O.", "respondent": "RUS", "articles": "3;5;5-1;5-1-c;6;6-1;6-3-b;6-3-c;6-3-d;10;10-1;10-2;11;11-1;11-2", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Communicated", "separate_opinion": "", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "129": { "webcast_id": "2958012_24012018", "hearing_date": "2018-01-24 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Navalnyy v. Russia (nos. 29580\/12, 36847\/12, 11252\/13, 12317\/13 and 43746\/14)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "11252\/13", "case_id": "001-187605", "case_name": "CASE OF NAVALNYY v. RUSSIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-187605", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2018-11-15 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Sections 2, 5, 7 and 16 of the Federal Law no. 54-FZ of 19 June 2004 on Gatherings, Meetings, Demonstrations, Processions and Pickets, (\u201c the Public Events Act\u201d ) ; Articles 19 \u00a7 3 and 20 \u00a7 2 of the Code of Administrative Offences ; Law no. 65-FZ of 8 June 2012 amending the Code of Administrative Offences ", "represented_by": "MIKHAYLOVA O. ; TEREKHOV K. ; MARALYAN A. ; MOSKALENKO K.", "respondent": "RUS", "articles": "5;5-1;6;6-1;11;11-1;11-2;18;18+11-1;18+5-1;35;35-1;41;46;46-2", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Alekseyev v. Russia, nos. 4916\/07, 25924\/08 and 14599\/09, 21 October 2010;Barankevich v. Russia, no. 10519\/03, \u00a7 28, 26 July 2007;Berladir and Others v. Russia, no. 34202\/06, \u00a7 39, 10 July 2012;Ble\u010di\u0107 v. Croatia [GC], no. 59532\/00, \u00a7 65, ECHR 2006 III;Blokhin v. Russia [GC], no. 47152\/06, ECHR 2016;Broniowski v. Poland [GC], no. 31443\/96, \u00a7 192, ECHR 2004-V;Bukta and Others v. Hungary, no. 25691\/04, \u00a7 37, ECHR 2007 III;Buzadji v. the Republic of Moldova [GC], no. 23755\/07, ECHR 2016 (extracts);Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin C\u00e2mpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848\/08, \u00a7 158, ECHR 2014;Ceylan v. Turkey [GC], no. 23556\/94, \u00a7 34, ECHR 1999 IV;Cump\u01cen\u01ce and Maz\u01cere v. Romania [GC], no. 33348\/96, ECHR 2004 XI;Demicoli v. Malta, 27 August 1991, \u00a7\u00a7 31-34, Series A no. 210;Engel and Others v. the Netherlands, 8 June 1976, \u00a7\u00a7 82 83, Series A no. 22;Ezeh and Connors v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 39665\/98 and 40086\/98, ECHR 2003 X;Ezelin v. France, 26 April 1991, Series A no. 202;F\u00e1ber v. Hungary, no. 40721\/08, \u00a7 47, 24 July 2012;F\u00e1bi\u00e1n v. Hungary [GC], no. 78117\/13, \u00a7 90, ECHR 2017 (extracts);Gorzelik and Others v. Poland [GC], no. 44158\/98, \u00a7 90, ECHR 2004 I;Hasan and Chaush v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 30985\/96, \u00a7 84, ECHR 2000 XI;Jussila v. Finland [GC], no. 73053\/01, ECHR 2006 XIV;K. and T. v. Finland [GC], no. 25702\/94, ECHR 2001-VII;Kar\u00e1csony and Others v. Hungary [GC], nos. 42461\/13 and 44357\/13, ECHR 2016 (extracts);Kasparov and Others v. Russia (no. 2), no. 51988\/07, 13 December 2016;Kudrevi\u010dius and Others v. Lithuania [GC], no. 37553\/05, ECHR 2015;Lashmankin and Others v. Russia, nos. 57818\/09 and 14 others, \u00a7\u00a7 216-312, 7 February 2017;Leyla \u015eahin v. Turkey [GC], no. 44774\/98, ECHR 2005 XI;Maestri v. Italy [GC], no. 39748\/98, \u00a7 30, ECHR 2004 I;Magyar Helsinki Bizotts\u00e1g v. Hungary [GC], no. 18030\/11, \u00a7 163, ECHR 2016;Makhmudov v. Russia, no. 35082\/04, 26 July 2007;Malofeyeva v. Russia, no. 36673\/04, 30 May 2013;Menesheva v. Russia, no. 59261\/00, \u00a7\u00a7 95-98, ECHR 2006 III;Merabishvili v. Georgia [GC], no. 72508\/13, 28 November 2017;Mikhaylova v. Russia, no. 46998\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 57-69, 19 November 2015;Mouvement ra\u00eblien suisse v. Switzerland [GC], no. 16354\/06, \u00a7 61, ECHR 2012 (extracts);Navalnyy and Ofitserov v. Russia, nos. 46632\/13 and 28671\/14, \u00a7 119, 23 February 2016;Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204\/11, \u00a7\u00a7 43-44, 4 December 2014;Navalnyye v. Russia, no. 101\/15, \u00a7\u00a7 83-84, 17 October 2017;Nemtsov v. Russia, no. 1774\/11, 31 July 2014;O\u0308ztu\u0308rk v. Germany, 21 February 1984, \u00a7 50, Series A no. 73;Perin\u00e7ek v. Switzerland [GC], no. 27510\/08, ECHR 2015;Pine Valley Developments Ltd and Others v. Ireland, 29 November 1991, \u00a7 45, Series A no. 222;Primov and Others v. Russia, no. 17391\/06, 12 June 2014;Radomilja and Others v. Croatia [GC], nos. 37685\/10 and 22768\/12, ECHR 2018;Roman Zakharov v. Russia [GC], no. 47143\/06, \u00a7 232, ECHR 2015;Sam\u00fct Karabulut v. Turkey, no. 16999\/04, \u00a7 35, 27 January 2009;Scozzari and Giunta v. Italy [GC], nos. 39221\/98 and 41963\/98, \u00a7 249, ECHR 2000 VIII;Sergey Kuznetsov v. Russia, no. 10877\/04, 23 October 2008;Simeonovi v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 21980\/04, ECHR 2017 (extracts);Stanev v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 36760\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 254-55, ECHR 2012;Stankov and the United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden v. Bulgaria, nos. 29221\/95 and 29225\/95, \u00a7 85, ECHR 2001 IX;Stec and Others v. the United Kingdom (dec.) [GC], nos. 65731\/01 and 65900\/01, \u00a7 48, ECHR 2005 X;Svinarenko and Slyadnev v. Russia [GC], nos. 32541\/08 and 43441\/08, \u00a7 79, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Taranenko v. Russia, no. 19554\/05, \u00a7 65, 15 May 2014;Young, James and Webster v. the United Kingdom, 13 August 1981, \u00a7 63, Series A no. 44;\u017ddanoka v. Latvia [GC], no. 58278\/00, \u00a7 98, ECHR 2006 IV", "external_sources": "Decision of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on the execution of the judgement in Lashmankin and Others v. Russian Federation (Application No. 57818\/09), adopted on 7 June 2018 at its 1318th meeting, CM\/Del\/Dec(2018)1318\/H46-21;Follow-up Memorandum of the Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights on Freedom of Assembly in the Russian Federation, dated 5 September 2017", "conclusion": "Preliminary objections dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Six-month period;Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention);No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Administrative proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Administrative proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing);Violation of Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association (Article 11-1 - Freedom of peaceful assembly);Violation of Article 18+5-1 - Limitation on use of restrictions on rights (Article 18 - Restrictions for unauthorised purposes) (Article 5 - Right to liberty and security;Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention);Violation of Article 18+11-1 - Limitation on use of restrictions on rights (Article 18 - Restrictions for unauthorised purposes) (Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association;Article 11-1 - Freedom of peaceful assembly);Pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Respondent State to take measures of a general character (Article 46-2 - General measures)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Alena Pol\u00e1\u010dkov\u00e1;Ale\u0161 Pejchal;Andr\u00e9 Potocki;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Armen Harutyunyan;Branko Lubarda;Dmitry Dedov;Ganna Yudkivska;Guido Raimondi;Helen Keller;Helena J\u00e4derblom;Ledi Bianku;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Luis L\u00f3pez Guerra;Pauliine Koskelo;Robert Spano;Georges Ravarani;Pere Pastor Vilanova", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1115JUD002958012" }, "130": { "webcast_id": "2958012_24012018", "hearing_date": "2018-01-24 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Navalnyy v. Russia (nos. 29580\/12, 36847\/12, 11252\/13, 12317\/13 and 43746\/14)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "11252\/13", "case_id": "001-170655", "case_name": "CASE OF NAVALNYY v. RUSSIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-170655", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2017-02-02 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 3, "court": "6", "issue": "Articles 19.3, 27.2 and 27.3 of the Code of the Administrative Offences", "represented_by": "TEREKHOV K. ; MIKHAYLOVA O.", "respondent": "RUS", "articles": "5;5-1;6;6-1;11;11-1;11-2;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Berladir and Others v. Russia, no. 34202\/06, \u00a7 38, 10 July 2012;Bukta and Others v. Hungary, no. 25691\/04, \u00a7 34, ECHR 2007 III;Ezelin v. France, 26 April 1991, \u00a7 37, Series A no. 202;F\u00e1ber v. Hungary, no. 40721\/08, \u00a7 49, 24 July 2012;Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568\/12, 5 January 2016;Giulia Manzoni v. Italy, 1 July 1997, \u00a7 25, Reports 1997 IV;Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613\/07, 3 October 2013;Kudrevi\u010dius and Others v. Lithuania [GC], no. 37553\/05, ECHR 2015;Malofeyeva v. Russia, no. 36673\/04, 30 May 2013;Mikhaylova v. Russia, no. 46998\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 57-69, 19 November 2015;Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204\/11, 4 December 2014;Nemtsov v. Russia, no. 1774\/11, \u00a7 83, 31 July 2014;;Novikova and Others v. Russia, nos. 25501\/07, 57569\/11, 80153\/12, 5790\/13 and 35015\/13, 26 April 2016;Oya Ataman v. Turkey, no. 74552\/01, \u00a7 42, ECHR 2006 XIV;Schwabe and M.G. v. Germany, nos. 8080\/08 and 8577\/08, \u00a7 101, ECHR 2011 (extracts);Volkov and Adamskiy v. Russia, nos. 7614\/09 and 30863\/10, \u00a7\u00a7 68 and 71, 26 March 2015", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Violation of Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association (Article 11-1 - Freedom of peaceful assembly);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention);No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Administrative proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Administrative proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing);Pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Alena Pol\u00e1\u010dkov\u00e1;Branko Lubarda;Dmitry Dedov;Helen Keller;Helena J\u00e4derblom;Luis L\u00f3pez Guerra;Pere Pastor Vilanova", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0202JUD002958012" }, "131": { "webcast_id": "2958012_24012018", "hearing_date": "2018-01-24 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Navalnyy v. Russia (nos. 29580\/12, 36847\/12, 11252\/13, 12317\/13 and 43746\/14)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "11252\/13", "case_id": "001-146460", "case_name": "NAVALNYY v. RUSSIA and 4 other applications", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-146460", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "TEREKHOV K. I. ; MIKHAYLOVA O. O.", "respondent": "RUS", "articles": "3;5;5-1;5-1-c;6;6-1;6-3-b;6-3-c;6-3-d;10;10-1;10-2;11;11-1;11-2", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Communicated", "separate_opinion": "", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "132": { "webcast_id": "2958012_24012018", "hearing_date": "2018-01-24 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Navalnyy v. Russia (nos. 29580\/12, 36847\/12, 11252\/13, 12317\/13 and 43746\/14)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "12317\/13", "case_id": "001-187605", "case_name": "CASE OF NAVALNYY v. RUSSIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-187605", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2018-11-15 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Sections 2, 5, 7 and 16 of the Federal Law no. 54-FZ of 19 June 2004 on Gatherings, Meetings, Demonstrations, Processions and Pickets, (\u201c the Public Events Act\u201d ) ; Articles 19 \u00a7 3 and 20 \u00a7 2 of the Code of Administrative Offences ; Law no. 65-FZ of 8 June 2012 amending the Code of Administrative Offences ", "represented_by": "MIKHAYLOVA O. ; TEREKHOV K. ; MARALYAN A. ; MOSKALENKO K.", "respondent": "RUS", "articles": "5;5-1;6;6-1;11;11-1;11-2;18;18+11-1;18+5-1;35;35-1;41;46;46-2", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Alekseyev v. Russia, nos. 4916\/07, 25924\/08 and 14599\/09, 21 October 2010;Barankevich v. Russia, no. 10519\/03, \u00a7 28, 26 July 2007;Berladir and Others v. Russia, no. 34202\/06, \u00a7 39, 10 July 2012;Ble\u010di\u0107 v. Croatia [GC], no. 59532\/00, \u00a7 65, ECHR 2006 III;Blokhin v. Russia [GC], no. 47152\/06, ECHR 2016;Broniowski v. Poland [GC], no. 31443\/96, \u00a7 192, ECHR 2004-V;Bukta and Others v. Hungary, no. 25691\/04, \u00a7 37, ECHR 2007 III;Buzadji v. the Republic of Moldova [GC], no. 23755\/07, ECHR 2016 (extracts);Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin C\u00e2mpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848\/08, \u00a7 158, ECHR 2014;Ceylan v. Turkey [GC], no. 23556\/94, \u00a7 34, ECHR 1999 IV;Cump\u01cen\u01ce and Maz\u01cere v. Romania [GC], no. 33348\/96, ECHR 2004 XI;Demicoli v. Malta, 27 August 1991, \u00a7\u00a7 31-34, Series A no. 210;Engel and Others v. the Netherlands, 8 June 1976, \u00a7\u00a7 82 83, Series A no. 22;Ezeh and Connors v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 39665\/98 and 40086\/98, ECHR 2003 X;Ezelin v. France, 26 April 1991, Series A no. 202;F\u00e1ber v. Hungary, no. 40721\/08, \u00a7 47, 24 July 2012;F\u00e1bi\u00e1n v. Hungary [GC], no. 78117\/13, \u00a7 90, ECHR 2017 (extracts);Gorzelik and Others v. Poland [GC], no. 44158\/98, \u00a7 90, ECHR 2004 I;Hasan and Chaush v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 30985\/96, \u00a7 84, ECHR 2000 XI;Jussila v. Finland [GC], no. 73053\/01, ECHR 2006 XIV;K. and T. v. Finland [GC], no. 25702\/94, ECHR 2001-VII;Kar\u00e1csony and Others v. Hungary [GC], nos. 42461\/13 and 44357\/13, ECHR 2016 (extracts);Kasparov and Others v. Russia (no. 2), no. 51988\/07, 13 December 2016;Kudrevi\u010dius and Others v. Lithuania [GC], no. 37553\/05, ECHR 2015;Lashmankin and Others v. Russia, nos. 57818\/09 and 14 others, \u00a7\u00a7 216-312, 7 February 2017;Leyla \u015eahin v. Turkey [GC], no. 44774\/98, ECHR 2005 XI;Maestri v. Italy [GC], no. 39748\/98, \u00a7 30, ECHR 2004 I;Magyar Helsinki Bizotts\u00e1g v. Hungary [GC], no. 18030\/11, \u00a7 163, ECHR 2016;Makhmudov v. Russia, no. 35082\/04, 26 July 2007;Malofeyeva v. Russia, no. 36673\/04, 30 May 2013;Menesheva v. Russia, no. 59261\/00, \u00a7\u00a7 95-98, ECHR 2006 III;Merabishvili v. Georgia [GC], no. 72508\/13, 28 November 2017;Mikhaylova v. Russia, no. 46998\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 57-69, 19 November 2015;Mouvement ra\u00eblien suisse v. Switzerland [GC], no. 16354\/06, \u00a7 61, ECHR 2012 (extracts);Navalnyy and Ofitserov v. Russia, nos. 46632\/13 and 28671\/14, \u00a7 119, 23 February 2016;Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204\/11, \u00a7\u00a7 43-44, 4 December 2014;Navalnyye v. Russia, no. 101\/15, \u00a7\u00a7 83-84, 17 October 2017;Nemtsov v. Russia, no. 1774\/11, 31 July 2014;O\u0308ztu\u0308rk v. Germany, 21 February 1984, \u00a7 50, Series A no. 73;Perin\u00e7ek v. Switzerland [GC], no. 27510\/08, ECHR 2015;Pine Valley Developments Ltd and Others v. Ireland, 29 November 1991, \u00a7 45, Series A no. 222;Primov and Others v. Russia, no. 17391\/06, 12 June 2014;Radomilja and Others v. Croatia [GC], nos. 37685\/10 and 22768\/12, ECHR 2018;Roman Zakharov v. Russia [GC], no. 47143\/06, \u00a7 232, ECHR 2015;Sam\u00fct Karabulut v. Turkey, no. 16999\/04, \u00a7 35, 27 January 2009;Scozzari and Giunta v. Italy [GC], nos. 39221\/98 and 41963\/98, \u00a7 249, ECHR 2000 VIII;Sergey Kuznetsov v. Russia, no. 10877\/04, 23 October 2008;Simeonovi v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 21980\/04, ECHR 2017 (extracts);Stanev v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 36760\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 254-55, ECHR 2012;Stankov and the United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden v. Bulgaria, nos. 29221\/95 and 29225\/95, \u00a7 85, ECHR 2001 IX;Stec and Others v. the United Kingdom (dec.) [GC], nos. 65731\/01 and 65900\/01, \u00a7 48, ECHR 2005 X;Svinarenko and Slyadnev v. Russia [GC], nos. 32541\/08 and 43441\/08, \u00a7 79, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Taranenko v. Russia, no. 19554\/05, \u00a7 65, 15 May 2014;Young, James and Webster v. the United Kingdom, 13 August 1981, \u00a7 63, Series A no. 44;\u017ddanoka v. Latvia [GC], no. 58278\/00, \u00a7 98, ECHR 2006 IV", "external_sources": "Decision of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on the execution of the judgement in Lashmankin and Others v. Russian Federation (Application No. 57818\/09), adopted on 7 June 2018 at its 1318th meeting, CM\/Del\/Dec(2018)1318\/H46-21;Follow-up Memorandum of the Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights on Freedom of Assembly in the Russian Federation, dated 5 September 2017", "conclusion": "Preliminary objections dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Six-month period;Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention);No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Administrative proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Administrative proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing);Violation of Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association (Article 11-1 - Freedom of peaceful assembly);Violation of Article 18+5-1 - Limitation on use of restrictions on rights (Article 18 - Restrictions for unauthorised purposes) (Article 5 - Right to liberty and security;Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention);Violation of Article 18+11-1 - Limitation on use of restrictions on rights (Article 18 - Restrictions for unauthorised purposes) (Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association;Article 11-1 - Freedom of peaceful assembly);Pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Respondent State to take measures of a general character (Article 46-2 - General measures)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Alena Pol\u00e1\u010dkov\u00e1;Ale\u0161 Pejchal;Andr\u00e9 Potocki;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Armen Harutyunyan;Branko Lubarda;Dmitry Dedov;Ganna Yudkivska;Guido Raimondi;Helen Keller;Helena J\u00e4derblom;Ledi Bianku;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Luis L\u00f3pez Guerra;Pauliine Koskelo;Robert Spano;Georges Ravarani;Pere Pastor Vilanova", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1115JUD002958012" }, "133": { "webcast_id": "2958012_24012018", "hearing_date": "2018-01-24 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Navalnyy v. Russia (nos. 29580\/12, 36847\/12, 11252\/13, 12317\/13 and 43746\/14)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "12317\/13", "case_id": "001-170655", "case_name": "CASE OF NAVALNYY v. RUSSIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-170655", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2017-02-02 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 3, "court": "6", "issue": "Articles 19.3, 27.2 and 27.3 of the Code of the Administrative Offences", "represented_by": "TEREKHOV K. ; MIKHAYLOVA O.", "respondent": "RUS", "articles": "5;5-1;6;6-1;11;11-1;11-2;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Berladir and Others v. Russia, no. 34202\/06, \u00a7 38, 10 July 2012;Bukta and Others v. Hungary, no. 25691\/04, \u00a7 34, ECHR 2007 III;Ezelin v. France, 26 April 1991, \u00a7 37, Series A no. 202;F\u00e1ber v. Hungary, no. 40721\/08, \u00a7 49, 24 July 2012;Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568\/12, 5 January 2016;Giulia Manzoni v. Italy, 1 July 1997, \u00a7 25, Reports 1997 IV;Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613\/07, 3 October 2013;Kudrevi\u010dius and Others v. Lithuania [GC], no. 37553\/05, ECHR 2015;Malofeyeva v. Russia, no. 36673\/04, 30 May 2013;Mikhaylova v. Russia, no. 46998\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 57-69, 19 November 2015;Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204\/11, 4 December 2014;Nemtsov v. Russia, no. 1774\/11, \u00a7 83, 31 July 2014;;Novikova and Others v. Russia, nos. 25501\/07, 57569\/11, 80153\/12, 5790\/13 and 35015\/13, 26 April 2016;Oya Ataman v. Turkey, no. 74552\/01, \u00a7 42, ECHR 2006 XIV;Schwabe and M.G. v. Germany, nos. 8080\/08 and 8577\/08, \u00a7 101, ECHR 2011 (extracts);Volkov and Adamskiy v. Russia, nos. 7614\/09 and 30863\/10, \u00a7\u00a7 68 and 71, 26 March 2015", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Violation of Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association (Article 11-1 - Freedom of peaceful assembly);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention);No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Administrative proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Administrative proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing);Pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Alena Pol\u00e1\u010dkov\u00e1;Branko Lubarda;Dmitry Dedov;Helen Keller;Helena J\u00e4derblom;Luis L\u00f3pez Guerra;Pere Pastor Vilanova", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0202JUD002958012" }, "134": { "webcast_id": "2958012_24012018", "hearing_date": "2018-01-24 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Navalnyy v. Russia (nos. 29580\/12, 36847\/12, 11252\/13, 12317\/13 and 43746\/14)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "12317\/13", "case_id": "001-146460", "case_name": "NAVALNYY v. RUSSIA and 4 other applications", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-146460", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "TEREKHOV K. I. ; MIKHAYLOVA O. O.", "respondent": "RUS", "articles": "3;5;5-1;5-1-c;6;6-1;6-3-b;6-3-c;6-3-d;10;10-1;10-2;11;11-1;11-2", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Communicated", "separate_opinion": "", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "135": { "webcast_id": "2958012_24012018", "hearing_date": "2018-01-24 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Navalnyy v. Russia (nos. 29580\/12, 36847\/12, 11252\/13, 12317\/13 and 43746\/14)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "43746\/14", "case_id": "001-187605", "case_name": "CASE OF NAVALNYY v. RUSSIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-187605", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2018-11-15 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Sections 2, 5, 7 and 16 of the Federal Law no. 54-FZ of 19 June 2004 on Gatherings, Meetings, Demonstrations, Processions and Pickets, (\u201c the Public Events Act\u201d ) ; Articles 19 \u00a7 3 and 20 \u00a7 2 of the Code of Administrative Offences ; Law no. 65-FZ of 8 June 2012 amending the Code of Administrative Offences ", "represented_by": "MIKHAYLOVA O. ; TEREKHOV K. ; MARALYAN A. ; MOSKALENKO K.", "respondent": "RUS", "articles": "5;5-1;6;6-1;11;11-1;11-2;18;18+11-1;18+5-1;35;35-1;41;46;46-2", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Alekseyev v. Russia, nos. 4916\/07, 25924\/08 and 14599\/09, 21 October 2010;Barankevich v. Russia, no. 10519\/03, \u00a7 28, 26 July 2007;Berladir and Others v. Russia, no. 34202\/06, \u00a7 39, 10 July 2012;Ble\u010di\u0107 v. Croatia [GC], no. 59532\/00, \u00a7 65, ECHR 2006 III;Blokhin v. Russia [GC], no. 47152\/06, ECHR 2016;Broniowski v. Poland [GC], no. 31443\/96, \u00a7 192, ECHR 2004-V;Bukta and Others v. Hungary, no. 25691\/04, \u00a7 37, ECHR 2007 III;Buzadji v. the Republic of Moldova [GC], no. 23755\/07, ECHR 2016 (extracts);Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin C\u00e2mpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848\/08, \u00a7 158, ECHR 2014;Ceylan v. Turkey [GC], no. 23556\/94, \u00a7 34, ECHR 1999 IV;Cump\u01cen\u01ce and Maz\u01cere v. Romania [GC], no. 33348\/96, ECHR 2004 XI;Demicoli v. Malta, 27 August 1991, \u00a7\u00a7 31-34, Series A no. 210;Engel and Others v. the Netherlands, 8 June 1976, \u00a7\u00a7 82 83, Series A no. 22;Ezeh and Connors v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 39665\/98 and 40086\/98, ECHR 2003 X;Ezelin v. France, 26 April 1991, Series A no. 202;F\u00e1ber v. Hungary, no. 40721\/08, \u00a7 47, 24 July 2012;F\u00e1bi\u00e1n v. Hungary [GC], no. 78117\/13, \u00a7 90, ECHR 2017 (extracts);Gorzelik and Others v. Poland [GC], no. 44158\/98, \u00a7 90, ECHR 2004 I;Hasan and Chaush v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 30985\/96, \u00a7 84, ECHR 2000 XI;Jussila v. Finland [GC], no. 73053\/01, ECHR 2006 XIV;K. and T. v. Finland [GC], no. 25702\/94, ECHR 2001-VII;Kar\u00e1csony and Others v. Hungary [GC], nos. 42461\/13 and 44357\/13, ECHR 2016 (extracts);Kasparov and Others v. Russia (no. 2), no. 51988\/07, 13 December 2016;Kudrevi\u010dius and Others v. Lithuania [GC], no. 37553\/05, ECHR 2015;Lashmankin and Others v. Russia, nos. 57818\/09 and 14 others, \u00a7\u00a7 216-312, 7 February 2017;Leyla \u015eahin v. Turkey [GC], no. 44774\/98, ECHR 2005 XI;Maestri v. Italy [GC], no. 39748\/98, \u00a7 30, ECHR 2004 I;Magyar Helsinki Bizotts\u00e1g v. Hungary [GC], no. 18030\/11, \u00a7 163, ECHR 2016;Makhmudov v. Russia, no. 35082\/04, 26 July 2007;Malofeyeva v. Russia, no. 36673\/04, 30 May 2013;Menesheva v. Russia, no. 59261\/00, \u00a7\u00a7 95-98, ECHR 2006 III;Merabishvili v. Georgia [GC], no. 72508\/13, 28 November 2017;Mikhaylova v. Russia, no. 46998\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 57-69, 19 November 2015;Mouvement ra\u00eblien suisse v. Switzerland [GC], no. 16354\/06, \u00a7 61, ECHR 2012 (extracts);Navalnyy and Ofitserov v. Russia, nos. 46632\/13 and 28671\/14, \u00a7 119, 23 February 2016;Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204\/11, \u00a7\u00a7 43-44, 4 December 2014;Navalnyye v. Russia, no. 101\/15, \u00a7\u00a7 83-84, 17 October 2017;Nemtsov v. Russia, no. 1774\/11, 31 July 2014;O\u0308ztu\u0308rk v. Germany, 21 February 1984, \u00a7 50, Series A no. 73;Perin\u00e7ek v. Switzerland [GC], no. 27510\/08, ECHR 2015;Pine Valley Developments Ltd and Others v. Ireland, 29 November 1991, \u00a7 45, Series A no. 222;Primov and Others v. Russia, no. 17391\/06, 12 June 2014;Radomilja and Others v. Croatia [GC], nos. 37685\/10 and 22768\/12, ECHR 2018;Roman Zakharov v. Russia [GC], no. 47143\/06, \u00a7 232, ECHR 2015;Sam\u00fct Karabulut v. Turkey, no. 16999\/04, \u00a7 35, 27 January 2009;Scozzari and Giunta v. Italy [GC], nos. 39221\/98 and 41963\/98, \u00a7 249, ECHR 2000 VIII;Sergey Kuznetsov v. Russia, no. 10877\/04, 23 October 2008;Simeonovi v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 21980\/04, ECHR 2017 (extracts);Stanev v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 36760\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 254-55, ECHR 2012;Stankov and the United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden v. Bulgaria, nos. 29221\/95 and 29225\/95, \u00a7 85, ECHR 2001 IX;Stec and Others v. the United Kingdom (dec.) [GC], nos. 65731\/01 and 65900\/01, \u00a7 48, ECHR 2005 X;Svinarenko and Slyadnev v. Russia [GC], nos. 32541\/08 and 43441\/08, \u00a7 79, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Taranenko v. Russia, no. 19554\/05, \u00a7 65, 15 May 2014;Young, James and Webster v. the United Kingdom, 13 August 1981, \u00a7 63, Series A no. 44;\u017ddanoka v. Latvia [GC], no. 58278\/00, \u00a7 98, ECHR 2006 IV", "external_sources": "Decision of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on the execution of the judgement in Lashmankin and Others v. Russian Federation (Application No. 57818\/09), adopted on 7 June 2018 at its 1318th meeting, CM\/Del\/Dec(2018)1318\/H46-21;Follow-up Memorandum of the Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights on Freedom of Assembly in the Russian Federation, dated 5 September 2017", "conclusion": "Preliminary objections dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Six-month period;Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention);No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Administrative proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Administrative proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing);Violation of Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association (Article 11-1 - Freedom of peaceful assembly);Violation of Article 18+5-1 - Limitation on use of restrictions on rights (Article 18 - Restrictions for unauthorised purposes) (Article 5 - Right to liberty and security;Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention);Violation of Article 18+11-1 - Limitation on use of restrictions on rights (Article 18 - Restrictions for unauthorised purposes) (Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association;Article 11-1 - Freedom of peaceful assembly);Pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Respondent State to take measures of a general character (Article 46-2 - General measures)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Alena Pol\u00e1\u010dkov\u00e1;Ale\u0161 Pejchal;Andr\u00e9 Potocki;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Armen Harutyunyan;Branko Lubarda;Dmitry Dedov;Ganna Yudkivska;Guido Raimondi;Helen Keller;Helena J\u00e4derblom;Ledi Bianku;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Luis L\u00f3pez Guerra;Pauliine Koskelo;Robert Spano;Georges Ravarani;Pere Pastor Vilanova", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1115JUD002958012" }, "136": { "webcast_id": "2958012_24012018", "hearing_date": "2018-01-24 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Navalnyy v. Russia (nos. 29580\/12, 36847\/12, 11252\/13, 12317\/13 and 43746\/14)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "43746\/14", "case_id": "001-170655", "case_name": "CASE OF NAVALNYY v. RUSSIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-170655", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2017-02-02 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 3, "court": "6", "issue": "Articles 19.3, 27.2 and 27.3 of the Code of the Administrative Offences", "represented_by": "TEREKHOV K. ; MIKHAYLOVA O.", "respondent": "RUS", "articles": "5;5-1;6;6-1;11;11-1;11-2;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Berladir and Others v. Russia, no. 34202\/06, \u00a7 38, 10 July 2012;Bukta and Others v. Hungary, no. 25691\/04, \u00a7 34, ECHR 2007 III;Ezelin v. France, 26 April 1991, \u00a7 37, Series A no. 202;F\u00e1ber v. Hungary, no. 40721\/08, \u00a7 49, 24 July 2012;Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568\/12, 5 January 2016;Giulia Manzoni v. Italy, 1 July 1997, \u00a7 25, Reports 1997 IV;Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613\/07, 3 October 2013;Kudrevi\u010dius and Others v. Lithuania [GC], no. 37553\/05, ECHR 2015;Malofeyeva v. Russia, no. 36673\/04, 30 May 2013;Mikhaylova v. Russia, no. 46998\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 57-69, 19 November 2015;Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204\/11, 4 December 2014;Nemtsov v. Russia, no. 1774\/11, \u00a7 83, 31 July 2014;;Novikova and Others v. Russia, nos. 25501\/07, 57569\/11, 80153\/12, 5790\/13 and 35015\/13, 26 April 2016;Oya Ataman v. Turkey, no. 74552\/01, \u00a7 42, ECHR 2006 XIV;Schwabe and M.G. v. Germany, nos. 8080\/08 and 8577\/08, \u00a7 101, ECHR 2011 (extracts);Volkov and Adamskiy v. Russia, nos. 7614\/09 and 30863\/10, \u00a7\u00a7 68 and 71, 26 March 2015", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Violation of Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association (Article 11-1 - Freedom of peaceful assembly);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention);No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Administrative proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Administrative proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing);Pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Alena Pol\u00e1\u010dkov\u00e1;Branko Lubarda;Dmitry Dedov;Helen Keller;Helena J\u00e4derblom;Luis L\u00f3pez Guerra;Pere Pastor Vilanova", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0202JUD002958012" }, "137": { "webcast_id": "2958012_24012018", "hearing_date": "2018-01-24 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Navalnyy v. Russia (nos. 29580\/12, 36847\/12, 11252\/13, 12317\/13 and 43746\/14)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "43746\/14", "case_id": "001-146460", "case_name": "NAVALNYY v. RUSSIA and 4 other applications", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-146460", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "TEREKHOV K. I. ; MIKHAYLOVA O. O.", "respondent": "RUS", "articles": "3;5;5-1;5-1-c;6;6-1;6-3-b;6-3-c;6-3-d;10;10-1;10-2;11;11-1;11-2", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Communicated", "separate_opinion": "", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "138": { "webcast_id": "3555312_17012018", "hearing_date": "2018-01-17 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "S., V. and A. v. Denmark (no. 35553\/12)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "35553\/12", "case_id": "001-187391", "case_name": "CASE OF S., V. AND A. v. DENMARK", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-187391", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2018-10-22 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Sections 5(1) and 5(3) of the Police Act ; Sections 469 and 755 of the Administration of Justice Act ; Sections 3 and 18 of the Executive Order on Police Measures to Maintain Law and Order ; Articles 134a, 244, 245 and 291 of the Penal Code\n", "represented_by": "BONNEZ C. ; STADARFELD JENSEN T. ; ZIEBE H.", "respondent": "DNK", "articles": "5;5-1;5-1-c;5-3;5-5", "strasbourg_caselaw": "A. v. the United Kingdom, 23 September 1998, \u00a7 22, Reports 1998 VI;Amuur v. France, 25 June 1996, \u00a7 50, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 III;Aquilina v. Malta [GC], no. 25642\/94, \u00a7 48, ECHR 1999 III;Austin and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 39692\/09 and 2 others, ECHR 2012;Benham v. the United Kingdom, 10 June 1996, \u00a7 47, Reports 1996 III;Bozano v. France, 18 December 1986, \u00a7 59, Series A no. 111;Brogan and Others v. the United Kingdom, 29 November 1988, \u00a7 67, Series A no. 145 B;Buzadji v. the Republic of Moldova [GC], no. 23755\/07, ECHR 2016 (extracts);Chahal v. the United Kingdom, 15 November 1996, \u00a7 118, Reports 1996 V;D.P. and J.C. v. the United Kingdom, no. 38719\/97, \u00a7 109, 10 October 2002;Engel and Others v. the Netherlands, 8 June 1976, \u00a7 69, Series A no. 22;Epple v. Germany, no. 77909\/01, \u00a7 37, 24 March 2005;Erdag\u00f6z v. Turkey, 22 October 1997, \u00a7 51, Reports 1997 VI;Fox, Campbell and Hartley v. the United Kingdom, 30 August 1990, \u00a7 46, Series A no. 182;Gatt v. Malta, no. 28221\/08, \u00a7 46, ECHR 2010;Giuliani and Gaggio v. Italy [GC], no. 23458\/02, \u00a7 180, ECHR 2011 (extracts);G\u00f6thlin v. Sweden, no. 8307\/11, \u00a7 57, 16 October 2014;Hassan v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 29750\/09, \u00a7 97, ECHR 2014;Iliya Stefanov v. Bulgaria, no. 65755\/01, \u00a7 72, 22 May 2008;\u0130pek and Others v. Turkey, nos. 17019\/02 and 30070\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 36-37, 3 February 2009;James, Wells and Lee v. the United Kingdom, nos. 25119\/09 and 2 others, \u00a7 193, 18 September 2012;J\u0117\u010dius v. Lithuania, no. 34578\/97, ECHR 2000 IX;Johansen v. Norway, no. 10600\/83, Commission decision of 14 October 1985, Decisions and Reports (DR) 44, p. 162;John Murray v. the United Kingdom, 8 February 1996, \u00a7 55, Reports 1996 I;Kandzhov v. Bulgaria, no. 68294\/01, \u00a7\u00a7 66-67, 6 November 2008;Khayredinov v. Ukraine, no. 38717\/04, \u00a7 27, 14 October 2010;Korneykova v. Ukraine, no. 39884\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 34 and 43, 19 January 2012;Ladent v. Poland, no. 11036\/03, \u00a7 55, 18 March 2008;Lawless v. Ireland (no. 3), 1 July 1961, \u00a7 14, Series A no. 3;Liu v. Russia, no. 42086\/05, \u00a7 82, 6 December 2007;Lolova-Karadzhova v. Bulgaria, no. 17835\/07, \u00a7 29, 27 March 2012;M.C. v. Bulgaria, no. 39272\/98, \u00a7\u00a7 149-50, ECHR 2003 XII;Magee and Others v. the United Kingdom, nos. 26289\/12 and 2 others, \u00a7 78, ECHR 2015 (extracts);Marturana v. Italy, no. 63154\/00, \u00a7 80, 4 March 2008;Mastromatteo v. Italy [GC], no. 37703\/97, \u00a7\u00a7 67-68, ECHR 2002 VIII;McKay v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 543\/03, \u00a7 33, ECHR 2006 X;McVeigh and Others v. the United Kingdom, nos. 8022\/77, 8025\/77 and 8027\/77, Commission\u2019s report of 18 March 1981, DR 25, \u00a7 176;Mooren v. Germany [GC], no. 11364\/03, \u00a7\u00a7 77-79, 9 July 2009;O\u2019Hara v. the United Kingdom, no. 37555\/97, \u00a7\u00a7 34-35, ECHR 2001 X;Opuz v. Turkey, no. 33401\/02, \u00a7 159, ECHR 2009;Osman v. the United Kingdom, 28 October 1998, \u00a7 115, Reports 1998 VIII;Ostendorf v. Germany, no. 15598\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 69-73, 93-94, 97, 99 and 101, 7 March 2013;Osypenko v. Ukraine, no. 4634\/04, \u00a7 57, 9 November 2010;Petkov and Profirov v. Bulgaria, nos. 50027\/08 and 50781\/09, \u00a7 52, 24 June 2014;Radomilja and Others v. Croatia [GC], nos. 37685\/10 and 22768\/12, \u00a7 149, 20 March 2018;Reiner v. Germany, no. 28527\/08, \u00a7 78, 19 January 2012;Saadi v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 13329\/03, \u00a7 68, ECHR 2008;Sabeva v. Bulgaria, no. 44290\/07, \u00a7 58, 10 June 2010;Sarigiannis v. Italy, no. 14569\/05, \u00a7 43, 5 April 2011;Schwabe and M.G. v. Germany., nos. 8080\/08 and 8577\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 73 and 82, ECHR 2011-VI (extracts);Shimovolos v. Russia, no. 30194\/09, \u00a7 51, 21 June 2011;Soare and Others v. Romania, no. 24329\/02, \u00a7 236, 22 February 2011;Stanev v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 36760\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 184-191, ECHR 2012;Strogan v. Ukraine, no. 30198\/11, \u00a7 86, 6 October 2016;Urt\u0101ns v. Latvia, no. 16858\/11, \u00a7 28, 28 October 2014;Vasileva v. Denmark, no. 52792\/99, 25 September 2003;Weeks v. the United Kingdom, 2 March 1987, \u00a7 50, Series A no. 114;Winterwerp v. the Netherlands, 24 October 1979, \u00a7\u00a7 37 and 40, Series A no. 33;Witek v. Poland, no. 13453\/07, \u00a7 46, 21 December 2010;Witold Litwa v. Poland, no. 26629\/95, \u00a7\u00a7 72 73, ECHR 2000 III;Z and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 29392\/95, \u00a7 73, ECHR 2001 V", "external_sources": "Report of the Conference of Senior Officials on Human Rights to the Committee of Ministers on Article 5 \u00a7\u00a7 1 (c) and 3 of the second draft Convention (see the Preparatory Work on Article 5 of the Convention, p. 32)", "conclusion": "No violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Deprivation of liberty;Lawful arrest or detention;Article 5-1-c - Reasonably necessary to prevent offence)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Carlo Ranzoni;Dmitry Dedov;Erik M\u00f8se;Ganna Yudkivska;Guido Raimondi;Helena J\u00e4derblom;Jon Fridrik Kj\u00f8lbro;Julia Laffranque;Krzysztof Wojtyczek;Ledi Bianku;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Neboj\u0161a Vu\u010dini\u0107;Paul Lemmens;Robert Spano;St\u00e9phanie Mourou-Vikstr\u00f6m;Vincent A. De Gaetano", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1022JUD003555312" }, "139": { "webcast_id": "3555312_17012018", "hearing_date": "2018-01-17 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "S., V. and A. v. Denmark (no. 35553\/12)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "35553\/12", "case_id": "001-140688", "case_name": "S., V. and A. v. DENMARK", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-140688", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "NYTRUP T.", "respondent": "DNK", "articles": "5;5-1-c", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "", "separate_opinion": "", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "140": { "webcast_id": "7140910_20122017", "hearing_date": "2017-12-20 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Beuze v. Belgium (no. 71409\/10)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "71409\/10", "case_id": "001-187802", "case_name": "CASE OF BEUZE v. BELGIUM", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-187802", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2018-11-09 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "", "represented_by": "PACI D.", "respondent": "BEL", "articles": "6;6-1;6-3;6-3-c;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "A.T. v. Luxembourg, no 30460\/13, 9 April 2015;Adamkiewicz v. Poland, no 54729\/00, \u00a7\u00a7 84-87, 2 March 2010;Al Khawaja and Tahery v. Royaume Uni [GC], nos. 26766\/05 and 22228\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 118, and 152-165, ECHR 2011;Blokhin v. Russia [GC], no 47152\/06, 23 March 2016;Boz v. Turkey, no 2039\/04, \u00a7 35, 9 February 2010;Brusco v. France, no 1466\/07, \u00a7 54, 14 October 2010;Bykov v. Russia [GC], no 4378\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 94-105, 10 March 2009;\u00c7ark\u00e7\u0131 v. Turkey (no 2), no 28451\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 43-46, 14 October 2014;Castellino v. Belgium, no 504\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 45-47, 25 July 2013;Correia de Matos v. Portugal [GC], no 56402\/13, 4 April 2018;Dayanan v. Turkey, no 7377\/03, \u00a7 33, 13 October 2009;Dvorski v. Croatia [GC], no 25703\/11, ECHR 2015;Erkapi\u0107 v. Croatia, no 51198\/08, \u00a7 80, 25 April 2013;Galip Do\u011fru v. Turkey, no 36001\/06, \u00a7 84, 28 April 2015;Hovanesian v. Bulgaria, no 31814\/03, \u00a7 34, 21 December 2010;Ibrahim and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 50541\/08 and 3 others, 13 September 2016;John Murray v. the United Kingdom, 8 February 1996, \u00a7 66, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-I;Karada\u011f v. Turkey, no 12976\/05, \u00a7 47, 29 June 2010;Lanz v. Austria, no 24430\/94, \u00a7 50, 31 January 2002;Laska and Lika v. Albania, nos. 12315\/04 and 17605\/04, \u00a7 67, 20 April 2010;Lhermitte v. Belgium [GC], no 34238\/09, 29 November 2016;M v. the Netherlands, no 2156\/10, \u00a7\u00a7 82-85, 25 July 2017 (extracts);Ma\u0111er v. Croatia, no 56185\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 151 and 153, 21 June 2011;Moiseyev v. Russia, no 62936\/00, \u00a7\u00a7 217-218, 9 October 2008;Moreira Ferreira v. Portugal (no 2) [GC], no 19867\/12, \u00a7\u00a7 94 and 99, 11 July 2017 (extracts);Navone and Others v. Monaco, nos. 62880\/11 and 2 others, \u00a7\u00a7 73 74, 24 October 2013;\u00d6calan v. Turkey [GC], no 46221\/99, \u00a7\u00a7 131-135, ECHR 2005 IV;Rybacki v. Poland, no 52479\/99, \u00a7 56, 13 January 2009;Sakhnovskiy v. Russia [GC], no 21272\/03, \u00a7\u00a7 95-97, 2 November 2010;Salduz v. Turkey [GC], no 36391\/02, ECHR-2008;Sapan v. Turkey, no 17252\/09, \u00a7 21, 20 September 2011;Sava\u015f v. Turkey, no 9762\/03, \u00a7 67, 8 December 2009;Schatschaschwili v. Germany [GC], no 9154\/10, ECHR 2015;Schmid-Laffer v. Switzerland, no 41269\/08, \u00a7 37, 16 June 2015;\u0160ebalj v. Croatia, no 4429\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 256-257, 28 June 2011;Simeonovi v. Bulgaria [GC], no 21980\/04, \u00a7 128, 12 May 2017 (extracts);Simons v. Belgium, (dec.), no 71407\/10, \u00a7 30, 28 August 2012;Taxquet v. Belgium [GC], no 926\/05, ECHR 2010;Taxquet v. Belgium, no 926\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 25-31, 13 January 2009", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing;Article 6-3 - Rights of defence;Article 6-3-c - Defence through legal assistance);Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Egidijus K\u016bris;Ganna Yudkivska;Guido Raimondi;Helena J\u00e4derblom;Jon Fridrik Kj\u00f8lbro;Krzysztof Wojtyczek;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Neboj\u0161a Vu\u010dini\u0107;Paul Lemmens;Robert Spano;S\u00edofra O'Leary;St\u00e9phanie Mourou-Vikstr\u00f6m;Georges Ravarani;Ksenija Turkovi\u0107", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1109JUD007140910" }, "141": { "webcast_id": "2045214_06122017", "hearing_date": "2017-12-06 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Molla Sali v. Greece (no. 20452\/14)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "20452\/14", "case_id": "001-188985", "case_name": "CASE OF MOLLA SALI v. GREECE", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-188985", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 14, "document_date": "2018-12-19 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Article 1724 of the Civil Code ; Article 11 of the 1913 Treaty of Athens ; Section 4 of Law no. 147\/1914 ; Section 10 of Law no. 2345\/1920 ; Section 5(2) of Law no. 1920\/1991\n", "represented_by": "KTISTAKIS Y. ; TSITSELIKIS K.", "respondent": "GRC", "articles": "14;14+P1-1;34;35;35-1;41;P1-1;P1-1-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Akdivar and Others v. Turkey, 16 September 1996, \u00a7 68, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 IV;Baranowski v. Poland, no. 28358\/95, \u00a7 56, ECHR 2000 III;Beian v. Romania (no. 1), no. 30658\/05, \u00a7 39, ECHR 2007-V (extracts);Beyeler v. Italy [GC], no. 33202\/96, \u00a7 105, ECHR 2000 I;Biao v. Denmark [GC], no. 38590\/10, \u00a7 88, 24 May 2016;Brosset-Triboulet v. France [GC] no. 34078\/02, 29 March 2010;Carson and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 42184\/05, ECHR 2010;Clift v. the United Kingdom, no. 7205\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 56-59, 13 July 2010;D.H. and Others v. the Czech Republic [GC], no. 57325\/00, \u00a7 177, ECHR 2007 IV;E.B. v. France [GC], no. 43546\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 47-48, 22 January 2008;Efe v. Austria, no. 9134\/06, \u00a7 48, 8 January 2013;F\u00e1bi\u00e1n v. Hungary [GC], no. 78117\/13, \u00a7\u00a7 112-113, 5 September 2017;Fabris v. France [GC], no. 16574\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 51-56, ECHR 2013;Gherghina v. Romania [GC] (dec.), no. 42219\/07, \u00a7 85, 9 July 2015;Guberina v. Croatia, no. 23682\/13, \u00a7 78, ECHR 2016;\u0130zzettin Do\u011fan and Others v. Turkey [GC], no. 62649\/10, 26 April 2016;Karoussiotis v. Portugal, no. 23205\/08, \u00a7 57, 1 February 2011;Khamtokhu and Aksenchik v. Russia [GC], nos. 60367\/08 and 961\/11, \u00a7\u00a7 64-65, 24 January 2017;Konstantin Markin v. Russia [GC], no. 30078\/06, ECHR 2012;Korbely v. Hungary [GC], no. 9174\/02, \u00a7 72, ECHR 2008;Leyla \u015eahin v. Turkey [GC], no. 44774\/98, \u00a7\u00a7 108-10, ECHR 2005 XI;Lombardi Vallauri v. Italy, no. 39128\/02, 20 October 2009;Mazurek v. France, no. 34406\/97, \u00a7 42, ECHR 2000-II;Merger and Cros v. France, no. 68864\/01, \u00a7 32, 22 November 2004;Negrepontis-Giannisis v. Greece, no. 56759\/08, 3 May 2011;Parrillo v. Italy [GC], no. 46470\/11, \u00a7 211, CEDH 2015;Pellegrini v. Italy, no. 30882\/96, ECHR 2001-VIII;Pla and Puncernau v. Andorra, ECHR 2004-VIII, \u00a7 46;Prencipe v. Monaco, no. 43376\/06, \u00a7 93, 16 July 2009;Radomilja and Others v. Croatia [GC], nos. 37685\/10 and 22768\/10, 20 March 2018;Sejdovic v. Italy [GC], no. 56581\/00, \u00a7 46, ECHR 2006-II;Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803\/94, \u00a7 76, ECHR 1999 V;Serif v. Greece, no. 38178\/97, \u00a7 40, ECHR 1999-IX;\u015eerife Yi\u011fit v. Turkey [GC], no. 3976\/05, \u00a7 52, 2 November 2010;\u0160korjanec v. Croatia, no. 25536\/14, \u00a7 55, 28 March 2017;S\u00f6derman v. Sweden [GC], no. 5786\/08, \u00a7 107, ECHR 2013;Stec and Others v. the United Kingdom (dec.) [GC], nos. 65731\/01 and 65900\/01, \u00a7 55, ECHR 2005-X;Stummer v. Austria [GC], no. 37452\/02, \u00a7 88, ECHR 2011;Thlimmenos v. Greece [GC], no. 34369\/97, ECHR 2000 IV;Vallianatos and Others v. Greece [GC], nos. 29381\/09 and 32684\/09, \u00a7 85, ECHR 2013 (extracts);Vu\u010dkovi\u0107 and Others v. Serbia (preliminary objection) [GC], no. 17153\/11 and 29 others, \u00a7 74, 25 March 2014;Waite and Kennedy v. Germany [GC], no. 26083\/94, \u00a7 54, ECHR 1999-I;Weller v. Hungary, no. 44399\/05, \u00a7 37, 31 March 2009;X and Others v. Austria [GC], no. 19010\/07, \u00a7 98, ECHR 2013", "external_sources": "Treaty of Lausanne;Treaty of S\u00e8vres;Article 3 \u00a7 1 of the Council of Europe Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities\n", "conclusion": "Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Victim;Violation of Article 14+P1-1 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property;Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Possessions);Just satisfaction reserved (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Ale\u0161 Pejchal;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Armen Harutyunyan;Branko Lubarda;Carlo Ranzoni;Egidijus K\u016bris;Ganna Yudkivska;Guido Raimondi;Julia Laffranque;Kristina Pardalos;Ledi Bianku;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;M\u0101rti\u0146\u0161 Mits;Paul Lemmens;Pauliine Koskelo;Robert Spano;Tim Eicke", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1219JUD002045214" }, "142": { "webcast_id": "2045214_06122017", "hearing_date": "2017-12-06 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Molla Sali v. Greece (no. 20452\/14)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "20452\/14", "case_id": "001-203370", "case_name": "CASE OF MOLLA SALI v. GREECE", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-203370", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 12, "document_date": "2020-06-18 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "", "represented_by": "KTISTAKIS Y. ; TSITSELIKIS K. ", "respondent": "GRC", "articles": "41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Barber\u00e0, Messegu\u00e9 and Jabardo v. Spain (Article 50), 13 July 1994, \u00a7 17, Series A no. 285-C;Brum\u0103rescu v. Romania (just satisfaction) [GC], no. 28342\/95, \u00a7 20, ECHR 2001 I;Chiragov and Others v. Armenia (just satisfaction) [GC], no. 13216\/05, \u00a7 59, ECHR 2017;Comingersoll S.A. v. Portugal [GC], no. 35382\/97, \u00a7 29, ECHR 2000 IV;Cyprus v. Turkey (just satisfaction) [GC], no. 25781\/94, \u00a7 56, ECHR 2014;De Wilde, Ooms and Versyp v. Belgium (Article 50), 10 March 1972, \u00a7 16, Series A no. 14;Former King of Greece and Others v. Greece [GC] (just satisfaction), no. 25701\/94, \u00a7 79, 28 November 2002;Guiso-Gallisay v. Italy (just satisfaction) [GC], no. 58858\/00, \u00a7 90, 22 December 2009;Kuri\u0107 and Others v. Slovenia (just satisfaction) [GC], no. 26828\/06, \u00a7 79, ECHR 2014;Papamichalopoulos and Others v. Greece (Article 50), 31 October 1995, \u00a7 38, Series A no. 330-B;S.C. Granitul S.A. v. Romania (just satisfaction), no. 22022\/03, \u00a7 15, 24 April 2012;Kryvenkyy v. Ukraine, no. 43768\/07, \u00a7 52, 16 February 2017;Sargsyan v. Azerbaijan (just satisfaction) [GC], no. 40167\/06, \u00a7 39, 12 December 2017;Varnava and Others v. Turkey [GC], nos. 16064\/90 and 8 others, \u00a7 224, ECHR 2009;Visti\u0146\u0161 and Perepjolkins v. Latvia (just satisfaction) [GC], no. 71243\/01, ECHR 2014", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Alena Pol\u00e1\u010dkov\u00e1;Ale\u0161 Pejchal;Armen Harutyunyan;Branko Lubarda;Carlo Ranzoni;Egidijus K\u016bris;Ganna Yudkivska;Julia Laffranque;Kristina Pardalos;Ledi Bianku;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;M\u0101rti\u0146\u0161 Mits;Paul Lemmens;Pauliine Koskelo;Robert Spano;Tim Eicke", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0618JUD002045214" }, "143": { "webcast_id": "1021112_29112017", "hearing_date": "2017-11-29 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Ilnseher v. Germany (nos. 10211\/12 and 27505\/14)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "10211\/12", "case_id": "001-187540", "case_name": "CASE OF ILNSEHER v. GERMANY", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-187540", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2018-12-04 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Section 316f \u00a7\u00a7 2 and 3 of the Introductory Act to the Criminal Code ; Preventive Detention (Distinction) Act ; Bavarian Preventive Detention Execution Act ; Sections 7(2) and 105(1) of the Juvenile Courts Act ; Sections 1(1) and 4 of the Therapy Detention Act ; Articles 63, 66 and 67d \u00a7 2 of the Criminal Code ; Basic Law", "represented_by": "AHMED A. ; TEGEBAUER I.-J.", "respondent": "DEU", "articles": "5;5-1;5-1-a;5-1-c;5-1-e;5-4;6;6-1;7;7-1;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Al-Dulimi and Montana Management Inc. v. Switzerland [GC], no. 5809\/08, \u00a7 78, 21 June 2016;Aurnhammer v. Germany (dec.), no. 36356\/10, \u00a7 35, 21 October 2014;B. v. Germany, no. 61272\/09, \u00a7 68, 19 April 2012;Baranowski v. Poland, no. 28358\/95, ECHR 2000 III;Bergmann v. Germany, no. 23279\/14, 7 January 2016;Biziuk v. Poland (no. 2), no. 24580\/06, \u00a7 47, 17 January 2012;Brand v. the Netherlands, no. 49902\/99, \u00a7 62, 11 May 2004;C.B. v. Romania, no. 21207\/03, 20 April 2010;Del R\u00edo Prada v. Spain [GC], no. 42750\/09, ECHR 2013;Erkalo v. the Netherlands, 2 September 1998, \u00a7 52, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 VI;Fe\u0161ar v. the Czech Republic, no. 76576\/01, \u00a7 68, 13 November 2008;Frasik v. Poland, no. 22933\/02, \u00a7 63, ECHR 2010 (extracts);G. v. Germany, no. 65210\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 70 et seq., 7 June 2012;G.B. v. Switzerland, no. 27426\/95, \u00a7\u00a7 27 and 32-39, 30 November 2000;Glien v. Germany, no. 7345\/12, 28 November 2013;G\u00f6\u00e7 v. Turkey [GC], no. 36590\/97, \u00a7\u00a7 36-37, ECHR 2002 V;H.L. v. the United Kingdom, no. 45508\/99, \u00a7 98, ECHR 2004 IX;H.W. v. Germany, no. 17167\/11, \u00a7\u00a7 107 and 113, 19 September 2013;Hutchison Reid v. the United Kingdom, no. 50272\/99, ECHR 2003 IV;Idalov v. Russia [GC], no. 5826\/03, \u00a7 154, 22 May 2012;Ilnseher v. Germany, nos. 10211\/12 and 27505\/14, 2 February 2017;Jamil v. France, 8 June 1995, \u00a7 30, Series A no. 317 B;Jendrowiak v. Germany, no. 30060\/04, \u00a7 35, 14 April 2011;K. and T. v. Finland [GC], no. 25702\/94, \u00a7\u00a7 140-141, ECHR 2001 VII;K. v. Germany, no. 61827\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 79 et seq., 7 June 2012;Kafkaris v. Cyprus [GC], no. 21906\/04, ECHR 2008;Karamanof v. Greece, no. 46372\/09, \u00a7 42, 26 July 2011;Kharin v. Russia, no. 37345\/03, \u00a7 31, 3 February 2011;Khudobin v. Russia, no. 59696\/00, \u00a7 124, ECHR 2006 XII (extracts);Klinkenbu\u00df v. Germany, no. 53157\/11, \u00a7 48, 25 February 2016;Lebedev v. Russia, no. 4493\/04, \u00a7\u00a7 96-102, 25 October 2007;Luberti v. Italy, 23 February 1984, \u00a7 28, Series A no. 75;M. v. Germany, no. 19359\/04, ECHR 2009;Mercan v. Turkey (dec.), no. 56511\/16, \u00a7 24, 8 November 2016;Mooren v. Germany [GC], no. 11364\/03, \u00a7 106, 9 July 2009;Mur\u0161i\u0107 v. Croatia [GC], no. 7334\/13, \u00a7\u00a7 136 et seq., ECHR 2016;Musia\u0142 v. Poland [GC], no. 24557\/94, \u00a7 47, ECHR 1999 II;Navarra v. France, 23 November 1993, \u00a7 28, Series A no. 273 B;Paradiso and Campanelli v. Italy [GC], no. 25358\/12, \u00a7 84, 24 January 2017;Petschulies v. Germany, no. 6281\/13, 2 June 2016;Piotr Baranowski v. Poland, no. 39742\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 63-64, 2 October 2007;R.M.D. v. Switzerland, 26 September 1997, \u00a7 42, Reports 1997 VI;Rakevich v. Russia, no. 58973\/00, \u00a7 26, 28 October 2003;Reiner v. Germany, no. 28527\/08, \u00a7 83, 19 January 2012;Ruiz Rivera v. Switzerland, no. 8300\/06, \u00a7 59, 18 February 2014;S. v. Germany, no. 3300\/10, \u00a7 81, 28 June 2012;S.T.S. v. the Netherlands, no. 277\/05, \u00a7 43, ECHR 2011;Saadi v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 13229\/03, \u00a7 67, ECHR 2008;Sabeva v. Bulgaria, no. 44290\/07, \u00a7 58, 10 June 2010;\u015eahin Alpay v. Turkey, no. 16538\/17, \u00a7 137, ECHR 2018;Schmitz v. Germany, no. 30493\/04, 9 June 2011;Shcherbina v. Russia, no. 41970\/11, 26 June 2014;Shimovolos v. Russia, no. 30194\/09, \u00a7 51, 21 June 2011;Simeonovi v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 21980\/04, \u00a7 83, 12 May 2017;Sisojeva and Others v. Latvia (striking out) [GC], no. 60654\/00, \u00a7 61, ECHR 2007 I;Smatana v. the Czech Republic, no. 18642\/04, 27 September 2007;Stanev v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 36760\/06, \u00a7 143 & 145, ECHR 2012,;Stephens v. Malta (no. 2), no. 33740\/06, \u00a7 84, 21 April 2009;\u0164upa v. the Czech Republic, no. 39822\/07, \u00a7 47, 26 May 2011;V.K. v. Russia, no. 9139\/08, \u00a7 30, 4 April 2017;Van der Velden v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 29514\/05, ECHR 2006 XV;Varbanov v. Bulgaria, no. 31365\/96, \u00a7\u00a7 46- 47, ECHR 2000 X;Vogt v. Switzerland (dec.), no. 45553\/06, \u00a7 36, 3 June 2014;W.P. v. Germany, no. 55594\/13, \u00a7 49, 6 October 2016;Welch v. the United Kingdom, 9 February 1995, Series A no. 307 A;Winterwerp v. the Netherlands, 24 October 1979, Series A no. 33;Witek v. Poland, no. 13453\/07, \u00a7 41, 21 December 2010;\u017d\u00fabor v. Slovakia, no. 7711\/06, \u00a7 89, 6 December 2011", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "No violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention;Article 5-1-e - Persons of unsound mind);No violation of Article 7 - No punishment without law (Article 7-1 - Heavier penalty;Retroactivity);No violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Speediness of review);No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Impartial tribunal)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Alena Pol\u00e1\u010dkov\u00e1;Ale\u0161 Pejchal;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Bertram Schmitt;Christiane Schmaltz;Christoph Grabenwarter;Dmitry Dedov;Erik M\u00f8se;Ganna Yudkivska;Guido Raimondi;Helena J\u00e4derblom;Jon Fridrik Kj\u00f8lbro;Kristina Pardalos;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Luis L\u00f3pez Guerra;M\u0101rti\u0146\u0161 Mits;Pauliine Koskelo;Paulo Pinto De Albuquerque;Renate Jaeger;Robert Spano;S\u00edofra O'Leary;St\u00e9phanie Mourou-Vikstr\u00f6m;Vincent A. De Gaetano;Yonko Grozev;Georges Ravarani", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1204JUD001021112" }, "144": { "webcast_id": "1021112_29112017", "hearing_date": "2017-11-29 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Ilnseher v. Germany (nos. 10211\/12 and 27505\/14)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "10211\/12", "case_id": "001-170653", "case_name": "CASE OF ILNSEHER v. GERMANY", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-170653", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2017-02-02 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "23", "issue": "", "represented_by": "TEGEBAUER I.-J.", "respondent": "DEU", "articles": "5;5-1;5-4;6;6-1;7;7-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "No violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention);No violation of Article 7 - No punishment without law (Article 7-1 - Heavier penalty);No violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Speediness of review);No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Impartial tribunal)", "separate_opinion": "FALSE", "judges": "Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Erik M\u00f8se;Ganna Yudkivska;M\u0101rti\u0146\u0161 Mits;S\u00edofra O'Leary;Yonko Grozev", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0202JUD001021112" }, "145": { "webcast_id": "1021112_29112017", "hearing_date": "2017-11-29 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Ilnseher v. Germany (nos. 10211\/12 and 27505\/14)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "10211\/12", "case_id": "001-139684", "case_name": "ILNSEHER v. GERMANY", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-139684", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "AHMED A.", "respondent": "DEU", "articles": "5;5-1;5-1-a;6;6-1;7;7-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "", "separate_opinion": "", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "146": { "webcast_id": "1021112_29112017", "hearing_date": "2017-11-29 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Ilnseher v. Germany (nos. 10211\/12 and 27505\/14)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "27505\/14", "case_id": "001-187540", "case_name": "CASE OF ILNSEHER v. GERMANY", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-187540", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2018-12-04 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Section 316f \u00a7\u00a7 2 and 3 of the Introductory Act to the Criminal Code ; Preventive Detention (Distinction) Act ; Bavarian Preventive Detention Execution Act ; Sections 7(2) and 105(1) of the Juvenile Courts Act ; Sections 1(1) and 4 of the Therapy Detention Act ; Articles 63, 66 and 67d \u00a7 2 of the Criminal Code ; Basic Law", "represented_by": "AHMED A. ; TEGEBAUER I.-J.", "respondent": "DEU", "articles": "5;5-1;5-1-a;5-1-c;5-1-e;5-4;6;6-1;7;7-1;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Al-Dulimi and Montana Management Inc. v. Switzerland [GC], no. 5809\/08, \u00a7 78, 21 June 2016;Aurnhammer v. Germany (dec.), no. 36356\/10, \u00a7 35, 21 October 2014;B. v. Germany, no. 61272\/09, \u00a7 68, 19 April 2012;Baranowski v. Poland, no. 28358\/95, ECHR 2000 III;Bergmann v. Germany, no. 23279\/14, 7 January 2016;Biziuk v. Poland (no. 2), no. 24580\/06, \u00a7 47, 17 January 2012;Brand v. the Netherlands, no. 49902\/99, \u00a7 62, 11 May 2004;C.B. v. Romania, no. 21207\/03, 20 April 2010;Del R\u00edo Prada v. Spain [GC], no. 42750\/09, ECHR 2013;Erkalo v. the Netherlands, 2 September 1998, \u00a7 52, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 VI;Fe\u0161ar v. the Czech Republic, no. 76576\/01, \u00a7 68, 13 November 2008;Frasik v. Poland, no. 22933\/02, \u00a7 63, ECHR 2010 (extracts);G. v. Germany, no. 65210\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 70 et seq., 7 June 2012;G.B. v. Switzerland, no. 27426\/95, \u00a7\u00a7 27 and 32-39, 30 November 2000;Glien v. Germany, no. 7345\/12, 28 November 2013;G\u00f6\u00e7 v. Turkey [GC], no. 36590\/97, \u00a7\u00a7 36-37, ECHR 2002 V;H.L. v. the United Kingdom, no. 45508\/99, \u00a7 98, ECHR 2004 IX;H.W. v. Germany, no. 17167\/11, \u00a7\u00a7 107 and 113, 19 September 2013;Hutchison Reid v. the United Kingdom, no. 50272\/99, ECHR 2003 IV;Idalov v. Russia [GC], no. 5826\/03, \u00a7 154, 22 May 2012;Ilnseher v. Germany, nos. 10211\/12 and 27505\/14, 2 February 2017;Jamil v. France, 8 June 1995, \u00a7 30, Series A no. 317 B;Jendrowiak v. Germany, no. 30060\/04, \u00a7 35, 14 April 2011;K. and T. v. Finland [GC], no. 25702\/94, \u00a7\u00a7 140-141, ECHR 2001 VII;K. v. Germany, no. 61827\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 79 et seq., 7 June 2012;Kafkaris v. Cyprus [GC], no. 21906\/04, ECHR 2008;Karamanof v. Greece, no. 46372\/09, \u00a7 42, 26 July 2011;Kharin v. Russia, no. 37345\/03, \u00a7 31, 3 February 2011;Khudobin v. Russia, no. 59696\/00, \u00a7 124, ECHR 2006 XII (extracts);Klinkenbu\u00df v. Germany, no. 53157\/11, \u00a7 48, 25 February 2016;Lebedev v. Russia, no. 4493\/04, \u00a7\u00a7 96-102, 25 October 2007;Luberti v. Italy, 23 February 1984, \u00a7 28, Series A no. 75;M. v. Germany, no. 19359\/04, ECHR 2009;Mercan v. Turkey (dec.), no. 56511\/16, \u00a7 24, 8 November 2016;Mooren v. Germany [GC], no. 11364\/03, \u00a7 106, 9 July 2009;Mur\u0161i\u0107 v. Croatia [GC], no. 7334\/13, \u00a7\u00a7 136 et seq., ECHR 2016;Musia\u0142 v. Poland [GC], no. 24557\/94, \u00a7 47, ECHR 1999 II;Navarra v. France, 23 November 1993, \u00a7 28, Series A no. 273 B;Paradiso and Campanelli v. Italy [GC], no. 25358\/12, \u00a7 84, 24 January 2017;Petschulies v. Germany, no. 6281\/13, 2 June 2016;Piotr Baranowski v. Poland, no. 39742\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 63-64, 2 October 2007;R.M.D. v. Switzerland, 26 September 1997, \u00a7 42, Reports 1997 VI;Rakevich v. Russia, no. 58973\/00, \u00a7 26, 28 October 2003;Reiner v. Germany, no. 28527\/08, \u00a7 83, 19 January 2012;Ruiz Rivera v. Switzerland, no. 8300\/06, \u00a7 59, 18 February 2014;S. v. Germany, no. 3300\/10, \u00a7 81, 28 June 2012;S.T.S. v. the Netherlands, no. 277\/05, \u00a7 43, ECHR 2011;Saadi v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 13229\/03, \u00a7 67, ECHR 2008;Sabeva v. Bulgaria, no. 44290\/07, \u00a7 58, 10 June 2010;\u015eahin Alpay v. Turkey, no. 16538\/17, \u00a7 137, ECHR 2018;Schmitz v. Germany, no. 30493\/04, 9 June 2011;Shcherbina v. Russia, no. 41970\/11, 26 June 2014;Shimovolos v. Russia, no. 30194\/09, \u00a7 51, 21 June 2011;Simeonovi v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 21980\/04, \u00a7 83, 12 May 2017;Sisojeva and Others v. Latvia (striking out) [GC], no. 60654\/00, \u00a7 61, ECHR 2007 I;Smatana v. the Czech Republic, no. 18642\/04, 27 September 2007;Stanev v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 36760\/06, \u00a7 143 & 145, ECHR 2012,;Stephens v. Malta (no. 2), no. 33740\/06, \u00a7 84, 21 April 2009;\u0164upa v. the Czech Republic, no. 39822\/07, \u00a7 47, 26 May 2011;V.K. v. Russia, no. 9139\/08, \u00a7 30, 4 April 2017;Van der Velden v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 29514\/05, ECHR 2006 XV;Varbanov v. Bulgaria, no. 31365\/96, \u00a7\u00a7 46- 47, ECHR 2000 X;Vogt v. Switzerland (dec.), no. 45553\/06, \u00a7 36, 3 June 2014;W.P. v. Germany, no. 55594\/13, \u00a7 49, 6 October 2016;Welch v. the United Kingdom, 9 February 1995, Series A no. 307 A;Winterwerp v. the Netherlands, 24 October 1979, Series A no. 33;Witek v. Poland, no. 13453\/07, \u00a7 41, 21 December 2010;\u017d\u00fabor v. Slovakia, no. 7711\/06, \u00a7 89, 6 December 2011", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "No violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention;Article 5-1-e - Persons of unsound mind);No violation of Article 7 - No punishment without law (Article 7-1 - Heavier penalty;Retroactivity);No violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Speediness of review);No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Impartial tribunal)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Alena Pol\u00e1\u010dkov\u00e1;Ale\u0161 Pejchal;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Bertram Schmitt;Christiane Schmaltz;Christoph Grabenwarter;Dmitry Dedov;Erik M\u00f8se;Ganna Yudkivska;Guido Raimondi;Helena J\u00e4derblom;Jon Fridrik Kj\u00f8lbro;Kristina Pardalos;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Luis L\u00f3pez Guerra;M\u0101rti\u0146\u0161 Mits;Pauliine Koskelo;Paulo Pinto De Albuquerque;Renate Jaeger;Robert Spano;S\u00edofra O'Leary;St\u00e9phanie Mourou-Vikstr\u00f6m;Vincent A. De Gaetano;Yonko Grozev;Georges Ravarani", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1204JUD001021112" }, "147": { "webcast_id": "1021112_29112017", "hearing_date": "2017-11-29 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Ilnseher v. Germany (nos. 10211\/12 and 27505\/14)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "27505\/14", "case_id": "001-170653", "case_name": "CASE OF ILNSEHER v. GERMANY", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-170653", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2017-02-02 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "23", "issue": "", "represented_by": "TEGEBAUER I.-J.", "respondent": "DEU", "articles": "5;5-1;5-4;6;6-1;7;7-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "No violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention);No violation of Article 7 - No punishment without law (Article 7-1 - Heavier penalty);No violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Speediness of review);No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Impartial tribunal)", "separate_opinion": "FALSE", "judges": "Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Erik M\u00f8se;Ganna Yudkivska;M\u0101rti\u0146\u0161 Mits;S\u00edofra O'Leary;Yonko Grozev", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0202JUD001021112" }, "148": { "webcast_id": "1021112_29112017", "hearing_date": "2017-11-29 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Ilnseher v. Germany (nos. 10211\/12 and 27505\/14)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "27505\/14", "case_id": "001-150507", "case_name": "ILNSEHER v. GERMANY", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-150507", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "TEGEBAUER I. J.", "respondent": "DEU", "articles": "5;5-1-e;6;6-1;7;7-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Communicated", "separate_opinion": "", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "149": { "webcast_id": "4172013_15112017", "hearing_date": "2017-11-15 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Nicolae Virgiliu T\u0103nase v. Romania (no. 41720\/13)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "41720\/13", "case_id": "001-194307", "case_name": "CASE OF NICOLAE VIRGILIU T\u0102NASE v. ROMANIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-194307", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2019-06-25 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "", "represented_by": "TANASE D.I.", "respondent": "ROU", "articles": "2;2-1;3;6;6-1;8;8-1;35;35-1;35-3-a", "strasbourg_caselaw": "A. v. the United Kingdom, 23 September 1998, \u00a7 22, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-VI;Al Fayed v. France (dec.), no. 38501\/02, 27 September 2007;Al-Dulimi and Montana Management Inc. v. Switzerland [GC], no. 5809\/08, 21 June 2016;Anna Todorova v. Bulgaria, no. 23302\/03, 24 May 2011;Aquilina v. Malta [GC], no. 25642\/94, \u00a7 39, ECHR 1999 III;Armani Da Silva v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 5878\/08, \u00a7 233, 30 March 2016;Ashingdane v. the United Kingdom, 28 May 1985, \u00a7 57, Series A no. 93;Asiye Genc v. Turkey, no. 24109\/07, \u00a7 73, 27 January 2015;Assenov and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 24760\/94, 28 October 1998, Reports 1998-VIII;Association of the Victims of S.C. Rompetrol S.A. and S.C. Geomin S.A. and Others v. Romania, no. 24133\/03, \u00a7 65, 25 June 2013;Baji\u0107 v. Croatia, no. 41108\/10, \u00a7 90, 13 November 2012;Balogh v. Hungary, no. 47940\/99, \u00a7 72, 20 July 2004;Banel v. Lithuania, no. 14326\/11, \u00a7 65, 18 June 2013;B\u0103rbulescu v. Romania [GC], no. 61496\/08, \u00a7 70, 5 September 2017 (extracts);Beganovi\u0107 v. Croatia, no. 46423\/06, 25 June 2009;Bensaid v. the United Kingdom, no. 44599\/98, ECHR 2001 I;Besen v. Turkey (dec.), no. 48915\/09, \u00a7 38, 19 June 2012;Biser Kostov v. Bulgaria, no. 32662\/06, 10 January 2012;Bone v. France (dec.), no. 69869\/01, 1 March 2005;Borobar and Others v. Romania, no. 5663\/04, \u00a7 56, 29 January 2013;Bouyid v. Belgium [GC], no. 23380\/09, ECHR 2015;Budayeva and Others v. Russia, nos. 15339\/02 and 4 others, ECHR 2008 (extracts);Byrzykowski v. Poland, no. 11562\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 106-07, 27 June 2006;\u00c7ak\u0131c\u0131 v. Turkey [GC], no. 23657\/94, ECHR 1999-IV;Calvelli and Ciglio v. Italy [GC], no. 32967\/96, ECHR 2002 I;Cavit T\u0131narl\u0131o\u011flu v. Turkey, no. 3648\/04, 2 February 2016;Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin C\u00e2mpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848\/08, \u00a7 130, ECHR 2014;Cevrio\u011flu v. Turkey, no. 69546\/12, 4 October 2016;Ciecho\u0144ska v. Poland, no. 19776\/04, 14 June 2011;Codarcea v. Romania, no. 31675\/04, \u00a7 78, 2 June 2009;Costello-Roberts v. the United Kingdom, 25 March 1993, Series A no. 247 C;De Tommaso v. Italy [GC], no. 43395\/09, 23 February 2017;Denisov v. Ukraine [GC], no. 76639\/11, \u00a7 95, 25 September 2018;Dimitar Shopov v. Bulgaria, no. 17253\/07, 16 April 2013;Dvo\u0159\u00e1\u010dek v. Czech Republic, no. 12927\/13, \u00a7 111, 6 November 2014;Elberte v. Latvia, no. 61243\/08, ECHR 2015;Elena Cojocaru v. Romania, no. 74114\/12, \u00a7 122, 22 March 2016;El Masri v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia [GC], no. 39630\/09, ECHR 2012;Ergi v. Turkey, 28 July 1998, \u00a7 82, Reports 1998 IV;Ernst and Others v. Belgium, no. 33400\/96, \u00a7\u00a7 54 55, 15 July 2003;Fatih \u00c7ak\u0131r and Merve Nisa \u00c7ak\u0131r v. Turkey, no. 54558\/11, \u00a7 41, 5 June 2018;Fernandes de Oliveira v. Portugal [GC], no. 78103\/14, 31 January 2019;Forum Maritime S.A. v. Romania, nos. 63610\/00 and 38692\/05, \u00a7 91, 4 October 2007;Friend and Others v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 16072\/06, 24 November 2009;Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979\/96, \u00a7 43, ECHR 2000 VII;G.N. and Others v. Italy, no. 43134\/05, 1 December 2009;Golder v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1975, Series A no. 18;Gorgiev v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, no. 26984\/05, \u00a7 64, 19 April 2012;Gorou v. Greece (no. 2) [GC], no. 12686\/03, 20 March 2009;Haas v. Switzerland, no. 31322\/07, \u00a7 54, ECHR 2011;I.G. and Others v. Slovakia, no. 15966\/04, \u00a7 129, 13 November 2012;Igor Shevchenko v. Ukraine, no. 22737\/04, 12 January 2012;Ilbeyi Kemalo\u011flu and Meriye Kemalo\u011flu v. Turkey, no. 19986\/06, 10 April 2012;Jurica v. Croatia, no. 30376\/13, \u00a7 84, 2 May 2017;Kalender v. Turkey, no. 4314\/02, 15 December 2009;Kamenova v. Bulgaria, no. 62784\/09, \u00a7 41, 12 July 2018;Khlaifia and Others v. Italy [GC], no. 16483\/12, 15 December 2016;Koceski v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (dec.), no. 41107\/07, 22 October 2013;Kolyadenko and Others v. Russia, nos. 17423\/05 and 5 others, 28 February 2012;Kotelnikov v. Russia, no. 45104\/05, 12 July 2016;Kozac\u0131o\u011flu v. Turkey [GC], no. 2334\/03, \u00a7 40, 19 February 2009;Kraulaidis v. Lithuania, no. 76805\/11, \u00a7 57, 8 November 2016;Krivova v. Ukraine, no. 25732\/05, 9 November 2010;Kurt v. Turkey, 25 May 1998, Reports 1998 III;L.C.B. v. the United Kingdom, 9 June 1998, \u00a7 36, Reports 1998-III;Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772\/95, \u00a7 131, ECHR 2000 IV;Lambert and Others v. France [GC], no. 46043\/14, \u00a7 140, ECHR 2015 (extracts);Leray and Others v. France (dec.), no. 44617\/98, 16 January 2001;Lopes de Sousa Fernandes v. Portugal [GC], no. 56080\/13, 19 December 2017;Lupeni Greek Catholic Parish and Others v. Romania [GC], no. 76943\/11, \u00a7 89, 29 November 2016;M. and M. v. Croatia, no. 10161\/13, ECHR 2015 (extracts);M.C. v. Bulgaria, no. 39272\/98, ECHR 2003 XII;M.P. and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 22457\/08, 15 November 2011;Makaratzis v. Greece [GC], no. 50385\/99, ECHR 2004 XI;Ma\u017eukna v. Lithuania, no. 72092\/12, \u00a7 81, 11 April 2017;McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, 27 September 1995, \u00a7 151, Series A no. 324;McKerr v. the United Kingdom, no. 28883\/95, ECHR 2001 III;Med\u017elis Islamske Zajednice Br\u010dko and Others v. Bosnia and Herzegovina [GC], no. 17224\/11, \u00a7 76, 27 June 2017;Micallef v. Malta [GC], no. 17056\/06, \u00a7 58, ECHR 2009;Mocanu and Others v. Romania [GC], nos. 10865\/09 and 2 others, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Moldovan and Others v. Romania (no. 2), nos. 41138\/98 and 64320\/01, \u00a7\u00a7 119-22, ECHR 2005 VII (extracts);Mubilanzila Mayeka and Kaniki Mitunga v. Belgium, no. 13178\/03, ECHR 2006 XI;Mur\u0161i\u0107 v. Croatia [GC], no. 7334\/13, \u00a7 97, 20 October 2016;Mustafa Tun\u00e7 and Fecire Tun\u00e7 v. Turkey [GC], no. 24014\/05, \u00a7 170, 14 April 2015;Muta v. Ukraine, no. 37246\/06, \u00a7 58, 31 July 2012;N.B. v. Slovakia, no. 29518\/10, \u00a7 84, 12 June 2012;Na\u00eft-Liman v. Switzerland [GC], no. 51357\/07, 15 March 2018;\u00d6nery\u0131ld\u0131z v. Turkey [GC], no. 48939\/99, ECHR 2004-XII;Oruk v. Turkey, no. 33647\/04, \u00a7\u00a7 56-65, 4 February 2014;Osman v. the United Kingdom, 28 October 1998, Reports 1998 VIII;Paposhvili v. Belgium [GC], no. 41738\/10, \u00a7 174, 13 December 2016;Peck v. the United Kingdom, no. 44647\/98, \u00a7 62, ECHR 2003 I;Pereira Henriques v. Luxembourg, no. 60255\/00, 9 May 2006;Perez v. France [GC], no. 47287\/99, ECHR 2004 I;Peri\u015fan and Others v. Turkey, no. 12336\/03, \u00a7 85, 20 May 2010;Prynda v. Ukraine, no. 10904\/05, 31 July 2012;R.R. and Others v. Hungary, no. 19400\/11, \u00a7 32, 4 December 2012;R.\u0160. v. Latvia, no. 44154\/14, \u00a7 79, 8 March 2018;Radomilja and Others v. Croatia [GC], nos. 37685\/10 and 22768\/12, \u00a7 126, 20 March 2018;Railean v. Moldova, no. 23401\/04, \u00a7 28, 5 January 2010;Ramsahai and Others v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 52391\/99, \u00a7 324, ECHR 2007 II;Renolde v. France, no. 5608\/05, \u00a7 81, ECHR 2008 (extracts);S.Z. v. Bulgaria, no. 29263\/12, 3 March 2015;Sabanchiyeva and Others v. Russia, no. 38450\/05, ECHR 2013 (extracts);Sakir v. Greece, no. 48475\/09, 24 March 2016).;Salakhov and Islyamova v. Ukraine, no. 28005\/08, 14 March 2013;\u015eerife Yi\u011fit v. Turkey [GC], no. 3976\/05, \u00a7 50, 2 November 2010;S\u0131d\u0131ka \u0130mren v. Turkey, no. 47384\/11, \u00a7 58, 13 September 2016;\u0160ilih v. Slovenia [GC], no. 71463\/01, \u00a7\u00a7 155 and 192, 9 April 2009;Sinim v. Turkey, no. 9441\/10, \u00a7 63, 6 June 2017;S\u00f6derman v. Sweden [GC], no. 5786\/08, ECHR 2013;Soering v. the United Kingdom, 7 July 1989, \u00a7 120, Series A no. 161;S\u00fcrmeli v. Germany [GC], no. 75529\/01, ECHR 2006-VII;Ta\u015f v. Turkey, no. 24396\/94, 14 November 2000;Tonchev v. Bulgaria, no. 18527\/02, 19 November 2009;V.C. v. Slovakia, no. 18968\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 125-26, ECHR 2011 (extracts);Varnava and Others v. Turkey [GC], nos. 16064\/90 and 8 others, \u00a7 200, ECHR 2009;Vasileva v. Bulgaria, no. 23796\/10, \u00a7 63, 17 March 2016;Vilnes and Others v. Norway, nos. 52806\/09 and 22703\/10, 5 December 2013;Vo v. France [GC], no. 53924\/00, ECHR 2004 VIII;X and Y v. the Netherlands, 26 March 1985, Series A no. 91;Y. v. Slovenia, no. 41107\/10, ECHR 2015 (extracts);Y.F. v. Turkey, no. 24209\/94, \u00a7 33, ECHR 2003 IX;Z. and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 29392\/95, \u00a7\u00a7 73-75, ECHR 2001 V;Zavoloka v. Latvia, no. 58447\/00, \u00a7\u00a7 36 and 39, 7 July 2009;Zubac v. Croatia [GC], no. 40160\/12, \u00a7 78, 5 April 2018", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;No violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Access to court);No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Reasonable time)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Armen Harutyunyan;Egidijus K\u016bris;Ganna Yudkivska;Guido Raimondi;Helena J\u00e4derblom;Iulia Motoc;Kristina Pardalos;Krzysztof Wojtyczek;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Marko Bo\u0161njak;Neboj\u0161a Vu\u010dini\u0107;Paul Lemmens;Robert Spano;Vincent A. De Gaetano;Yonko Grozev;Gabriele Kucsko-Stadlmayer;Tim Eicke", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0625JUD004172013" }, "150": { "webcast_id": "4172013_15112017", "hearing_date": "2017-11-15 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Nicolae Virgiliu T\u0103nase v. Romania (no. 41720\/13)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "41720\/13", "case_id": "001-155789", "case_name": "NICOLAE VIRGILIU T\u0102NASE v. ROMANIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-155789", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "TANASE D. I.", "respondent": "ROU", "articles": "3", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Communicated", "separate_opinion": "", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "151": { "webcast_id": "4172013_15112017", "hearing_date": "2017-11-15 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Nicolae Virgiliu T\u0103nase v. Romania (no. 41720\/13)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "41720\/13", "case_id": "001-144089", "case_name": "T\u0102NASE v. ROMANIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-144089", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "", "respondent": "ROU", "articles": "3", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "", "separate_opinion": "", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "152": { "webcast_id": "5817013_07112017", "hearing_date": "2017-11-07 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Big Brother Watch and Others v. the United Kingdom (no. 58170\/13), Bureau of Investigative Journalism and Alice Ross v. the United Kingdom (no. 62322\/14) and 10 Human Rights Organisations and Others v. the United Kingdom (no. 24960\/15)", "hearing_type": "Chamber hearing", "appno": "58170\/13", "case_id": "001-210077", "case_name": "CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-210077", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2021-05-25 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 (\u201cRIPA\u201d) ; Interception of Communications Code of Practice (the \u201cIC Code\u201d)\n", "represented_by": "CAREY D. ; CURLING R. ; NORTON E.", "respondent": "GBR", "articles": "8;8-1;8-2;10;10-1;10-2;34", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Al-Skeini and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 55721\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 130-139, ECHR 2011;Amann v. Switzerland [GC], no. 27798\/95, \u00a7 69, ECHR 2000 II;Association for European Integration and Human Rights and Ekimdzhiev v. Bulgaria, no. 62540\/00, \u00a7 75, 28 June 2007;Centrum f\u00f6r r\u00e4ttvisa v. Sweden, no. 35252\/08, 19 June 2018;Goodwin v. the United Kingdom, no. 17488\/90, \u00a7 39, 27 March 1996;Heglas v. the Czech Republic, no. 5935\/02, \u00a7 74, 1 March 2007;Huvig v. France, 24 April 1990, Series A no. 176 B;Jaloud v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 47708\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 139 and 151 ECHR 2014;Kennedy v. the United Kingdom, no. 26839\/05, \u00a7 130, 18 May 2010;Klass and Others v. Germany, 6 September 1978, \u00a7\u00a7 55 and 56, Series A no. 28;Kruslin v. France, 24 April 1990, Series A no. 176 A;Leander v. Sweden, 26 March 1987, Series A no. 116;Liberty and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 58243\/00, 1 July 2008;Malone v. the United Kingdom, 2 August 1984, Series A no. 82;Nordisk Film & TV A\/S v. Denmark (dec.), no. 40485\/02, ECHR 2005 XIII;Roemen and Schmit v. Luxembourg, no. 51772\/99, \u00a7\u00a7 46 and 57, ECHR 2003 IV;Roman Zakharov v. Russia [GC], no. 47143\/06, ECHR 2015;Rotaru v. Romania [GC], no. 28341\/95, ECHR 2000 V;S. and Marper v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 30562\/04 and 30566\/04, ECHR 2008;S.M. v. Croatia [GC], no. 60561\/14, \u00a7 216, 25 June 2020;Sanoma Uitgevers B.V. v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 38224\/03, 14 September 2010;Segerstedt-Wiberg and Others v. Sweden, no. 62332\/00, \u00a7 120, ECHR 2006 VII;Szab\u00f3 and Vissy v. Hungary, no. 37138\/14, 12 January 2016;Valenzuela Contreras v. Spain, 30 July 1998, \u00a7 46, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 V;Voskuil v. the Netherlands, no. 64752\/01, \u00a7 65, 22 November 2007;Weber and Saravia v. Germany (dec.), no. 54934\/00, ECHR 2006\u2011XI;Wieser and Bicos Beteiligungen GmbH v. Austria, no. 74336\/01, \u00a7\u00a7 62-66, ECHR 2007 XI", "external_sources": "Report of the European Commission for Democracy through Law (the \u201cVenice Commission\u201d) on the Democratic Oversight of Signals Intelligence Agencies (2015);Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Security Act (\u201cFISA\u201d)\n", "conclusion": "Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Victim;Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression-{general} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression);Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression-{general} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression);No violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression-{general} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Ale\u0161 Pejchal;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Armen Harutyunyan;Carlo Ranzoni;Jon Fridrik Kj\u00f8lbro;Kristina Pardalos;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Marko Bo\u0161njak;M\u0101rti\u0146\u0161 Mits;Paul Lemmens;Pauliine Koskelo;Paulo Pinto De Albuquerque;Robert Spano;Vincent A. De Gaetano;Yonko Grozev;Gabriele Kucsko-Stadlmayer;Ksenija Turkovi\u0107;Tim Eicke", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0525JUD005817013" }, "153": { "webcast_id": "5817013_07112017", "hearing_date": "2017-11-07 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Big Brother Watch and Others v. the United Kingdom (no. 58170\/13), Bureau of Investigative Journalism and Alice Ross v. the United Kingdom (no. 62322\/14) and 10 Human Rights Organisations and Others v. the United Kingdom (no. 24960\/15)", "hearing_type": "Chamber hearing", "appno": "58170\/13", "case_id": "001-186048", "case_name": "CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-186048", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2018-09-13 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 3, "court": "4", "issue": "Chapter 12 and paragraphs 4.1-4.8, 6.22-6.24, 6.7, 7.2, 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, 7.6, 7.7, 7.8, 7.9, 7.15, 7.16, 7.17, 7.18 and 12.5 of the Interception of Communications Code of Practice (\u201cIC Code Practice\u201d) ; Chapter II and sections 5(3), 5(6), 8(1), 8(4), 9, 15, 15(2), 15(3), 15(4), 16, 16(2)(a), 16(2)(b), 16(3), 20, 22 and 81 of RIPA ; Paragraphs 2.24-2.27, 3.76 and 3.78-3.84 of the ACD Code ; Article 77-1-1 of the Criminal Procedure Code ; Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (\u201cPACE\u201d) ; Part 1 of Schedule 1 to the Data Protection Act 1998 ; Terrorism Act 2000 ; Section 19(2), (3), (4) and (5) of the Counter-Terrorism Act 2008 ; Investigatory Powers Act 2016 ; British-US Communication Intelligence Agreement of 5 March 1946 ; Security Services Act 1989 (\u201cSSA\u201d) ; Intelligence Services Act 1994 (\u201cISA\u201d) ; Section 1(1) of the Official Secrets Act 1989 (\u201cOSA\u201d)", "represented_by": "CAREY D. ; CURLING R. ; NORTON E.", "respondent": "GBR", "articles": "8;8-1;8-2;10;10-1;10-2;35;35-3-a", "strasbourg_caselaw": "A. and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 3455\/05, \u00a7 181, ECHR 2009;A. v. the Netherlands, no. 4900\/06, \u00a7 143, 20 July 2010;Akdivar and Others v. Turkey, 16 September 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 IV;Al-Skeini and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 55721\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 130-139, ECHR 2011;Anthony France and Others v. the United Kingdom (dec.), nos. 25357\/16, 25514\/16, 25552\/16 and 25597\/16, 26 September 2016;Association for European Integration and Human Rights and Ekimdzhiev v. Bulgaria, no. 62540\/00, 28 June 2007;Axel Springer AG v. Germany [GC], no. 39954\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 85-88, 7 February 2012;Ben Faiza v. France, no. 31446\/12, 8 February 2018;Bosphorus Hava Yollar\u0131 Turizm ve Ticaret Anonim \u015eirketi v. Ireland [GC], no. 45036\/98, \u00a7 165 ECHR 2005 VI;Burden v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 13378\/05, \u00a7 43, ECHR 2008;Chahal v. the United Kingdom, 15 November 1996, \u00a7 79, Reports 1996 V;Charron and Merle Montet v. France (dec), no. 22612\/15, \u00a7 30, 16 January 2018;Courtney v. Ireland (dec), no. 69558\/10, 18 December 2012;Demopoulos and Others v. Turkey (dec.) [GC], nos. 46113\/99, 3843\/02, 13751\/02, 13466\/03, 10200\/04, 14163\/04, 19993\/04 and 21819\/04, ECHR 2010;Goodwin v. the United Kingdom, 27 March 1996, Reports 1996 II;Gough v. the United Kingdom, no. 49327\/11, \u00a7 140, 28 October 2014;Heglas v. the Czech Republic, no. 5935\/02, \u00a7 74, 1 March 2007;Huvig v. France, 24 April 1990, Series A no. 176 B;Ireland v. the United Kingdom, 18 January 1978, Series A no. 25;Jaloud v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 47708\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 139 and 151 ECHR 2014;Klass and Others v. Germany, 6 September 1978, Series A no. 28;Kokkinakis v. Greece, 25 May 1993, \u00a7 40, Series A no. 260 A;Lawless v. Ireland (no. 3), 1 July 1961, \u00a7\u00a7 28\u201330, Series A no. 3;Leander v. Sweden, 26 March 1987, Series A no. 116;Liberty and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 58243\/00, 1 July 2008;Magee v. the United Kingdom, no. 28135\/95, \u00a7 50, ECHR 2000 VI;Malone v. the United Kingdom, 2 August 1984, Series A no. 82;McFarlane v. Ireland [GC], no. 31333\/06, \u00a7 107, 10 September 2010;MGN Limited v. the United Kingdom, no. 39401\/04, \u00a7\u00a7 140-155, 18 January 2011;Mustafa Sezgin Tanr\u0131kulu v. Turkey, no. 27473\/06, 18 July 2017;\u00d6calan v. Turkey [GC], no. 46221\/99, \u00a7 179, ECHR 2005 IV;Othman (Abu Qatada) v. United Kingdom, no. 8139\/09, \u00a7 183, ECHR 2012;Palomo S\u00e1nchez and Others v. Spain [GC], nos. 28955\/06, 28957\/06, 28959\/06 and 28964\/06, \u00a7 57, 12 September 2011;R.E. v. the United Kingdom, no. 62498\/11, 27 October 2015;Roemen and Schmit v. Luxembourg, no. 51772\/99, ECHR 2003-IV;Roman Zakharov v. Russia [GC], no. 47143\/06, ECHR 2015;Rotaru v. Romania [GC], no. 28341\/95, ECHR 2000 V;S. and Marper v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 30562\/04 and 30566\/04, ECHR 2008;Sanoma Uitgevers B.V. v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 38224\/03, 14 September 2010;Scoppola v. Italy (no. 2) [GC], no. 10249\/03, \u00a7 70, 17 September 2009;Sejdovic v. Italy [GC], no. 56581\/00, \u00a7 46, ECHR 2006 II;Szab\u00f3 and Vissy v. Hungary, no. 37138\/14, 12 January 2016;Trabelsi v. Belgium, no. 140\/10, \u00a7 117, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Uzun v. Germany, no. 35623\/05, ECHR 2010 (extracts);Valenzuela Contreras v. Spain, 30 July 1998, Reports 1998 V;Voskuil v. the Netherlands, no. 64752\/01, \u00a7 65, 22 November 2007;Vu\u010dkovi\u0107 and Others v. Serbia (preliminary objection) [GC], nos. 17153\/11 and 29 others, 25 March 2014;Weber and Saravia v. Germany (dec.), no. 54934\/00, ECHR 2006\u2011XI", "external_sources": "2015 Report of the European Commission for Democracy through Law (\u201cVenice Commission\u201d) on the Democratic Oversight of Signals Intelligence Agencies;2016 annual report of the Interception of Communications Commissioner", "conclusion": "Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression-{general} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Ale\u0161 Pejchal;Armen Harutyunyan;Kristina Pardalos;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Pauliine Koskelo;Ksenija Turkovi\u0107;Tim Eicke", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0913JUD005817013" }, "154": { "webcast_id": "5817013_07112017", "hearing_date": "2017-11-07 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Big Brother Watch and Others v. the United Kingdom (no. 58170\/13), Bureau of Investigative Journalism and Alice Ross v. the United Kingdom (no. 62322\/14) and 10 Human Rights Organisations and Others v. the United Kingdom (no. 24960\/15)", "hearing_type": "Chamber hearing", "appno": "58170\/13", "case_id": "001-140713", "case_name": "BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-140713", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "", "respondent": "GBR", "articles": "8;8-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "", "separate_opinion": "", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "155": { "webcast_id": "5817013_07112017", "hearing_date": "2017-11-07 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Big Brother Watch and Others v. the United Kingdom (no. 58170\/13), Bureau of Investigative Journalism and Alice Ross v. the United Kingdom (no. 62322\/14) and 10 Human Rights Organisations and Others v. the United Kingdom (no. 24960\/15)", "hearing_type": "Chamber hearing", "appno": "62322\/14", "case_id": "001-210077", "case_name": "CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-210077", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2021-05-25 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 (\u201cRIPA\u201d) ; Interception of Communications Code of Practice (the \u201cIC Code\u201d)\n", "represented_by": "CAREY D. ; CURLING R. ; NORTON E.", "respondent": "GBR", "articles": "8;8-1;8-2;10;10-1;10-2;34", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Al-Skeini and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 55721\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 130-139, ECHR 2011;Amann v. Switzerland [GC], no. 27798\/95, \u00a7 69, ECHR 2000 II;Association for European Integration and Human Rights and Ekimdzhiev v. Bulgaria, no. 62540\/00, \u00a7 75, 28 June 2007;Centrum f\u00f6r r\u00e4ttvisa v. Sweden, no. 35252\/08, 19 June 2018;Goodwin v. the United Kingdom, no. 17488\/90, \u00a7 39, 27 March 1996;Heglas v. the Czech Republic, no. 5935\/02, \u00a7 74, 1 March 2007;Huvig v. France, 24 April 1990, Series A no. 176 B;Jaloud v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 47708\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 139 and 151 ECHR 2014;Kennedy v. the United Kingdom, no. 26839\/05, \u00a7 130, 18 May 2010;Klass and Others v. Germany, 6 September 1978, \u00a7\u00a7 55 and 56, Series A no. 28;Kruslin v. France, 24 April 1990, Series A no. 176 A;Leander v. Sweden, 26 March 1987, Series A no. 116;Liberty and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 58243\/00, 1 July 2008;Malone v. the United Kingdom, 2 August 1984, Series A no. 82;Nordisk Film & TV A\/S v. Denmark (dec.), no. 40485\/02, ECHR 2005 XIII;Roemen and Schmit v. Luxembourg, no. 51772\/99, \u00a7\u00a7 46 and 57, ECHR 2003 IV;Roman Zakharov v. Russia [GC], no. 47143\/06, ECHR 2015;Rotaru v. Romania [GC], no. 28341\/95, ECHR 2000 V;S. and Marper v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 30562\/04 and 30566\/04, ECHR 2008;S.M. v. Croatia [GC], no. 60561\/14, \u00a7 216, 25 June 2020;Sanoma Uitgevers B.V. v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 38224\/03, 14 September 2010;Segerstedt-Wiberg and Others v. Sweden, no. 62332\/00, \u00a7 120, ECHR 2006 VII;Szab\u00f3 and Vissy v. Hungary, no. 37138\/14, 12 January 2016;Valenzuela Contreras v. Spain, 30 July 1998, \u00a7 46, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 V;Voskuil v. the Netherlands, no. 64752\/01, \u00a7 65, 22 November 2007;Weber and Saravia v. Germany (dec.), no. 54934\/00, ECHR 2006\u2011XI;Wieser and Bicos Beteiligungen GmbH v. Austria, no. 74336\/01, \u00a7\u00a7 62-66, ECHR 2007 XI", "external_sources": "Report of the European Commission for Democracy through Law (the \u201cVenice Commission\u201d) on the Democratic Oversight of Signals Intelligence Agencies (2015);Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Security Act (\u201cFISA\u201d)\n", "conclusion": "Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Victim;Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression-{general} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression);Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression-{general} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression);No violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression-{general} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Ale\u0161 Pejchal;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Armen Harutyunyan;Carlo Ranzoni;Jon Fridrik Kj\u00f8lbro;Kristina Pardalos;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Marko Bo\u0161njak;M\u0101rti\u0146\u0161 Mits;Paul Lemmens;Pauliine Koskelo;Paulo Pinto De Albuquerque;Robert Spano;Vincent A. De Gaetano;Yonko Grozev;Gabriele Kucsko-Stadlmayer;Ksenija Turkovi\u0107;Tim Eicke", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0525JUD005817013" }, "156": { "webcast_id": "5817013_07112017", "hearing_date": "2017-11-07 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Big Brother Watch and Others v. the United Kingdom (no. 58170\/13), Bureau of Investigative Journalism and Alice Ross v. the United Kingdom (no. 62322\/14) and 10 Human Rights Organisations and Others v. the United Kingdom (no. 24960\/15)", "hearing_type": "Chamber hearing", "appno": "62322\/14", "case_id": "001-186048", "case_name": "CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-186048", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2018-09-13 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 3, "court": "4", "issue": "Chapter 12 and paragraphs 4.1-4.8, 6.22-6.24, 6.7, 7.2, 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, 7.6, 7.7, 7.8, 7.9, 7.15, 7.16, 7.17, 7.18 and 12.5 of the Interception of Communications Code of Practice (\u201cIC Code Practice\u201d) ; Chapter II and sections 5(3), 5(6), 8(1), 8(4), 9, 15, 15(2), 15(3), 15(4), 16, 16(2)(a), 16(2)(b), 16(3), 20, 22 and 81 of RIPA ; Paragraphs 2.24-2.27, 3.76 and 3.78-3.84 of the ACD Code ; Article 77-1-1 of the Criminal Procedure Code ; Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (\u201cPACE\u201d) ; Part 1 of Schedule 1 to the Data Protection Act 1998 ; Terrorism Act 2000 ; Section 19(2), (3), (4) and (5) of the Counter-Terrorism Act 2008 ; Investigatory Powers Act 2016 ; British-US Communication Intelligence Agreement of 5 March 1946 ; Security Services Act 1989 (\u201cSSA\u201d) ; Intelligence Services Act 1994 (\u201cISA\u201d) ; Section 1(1) of the Official Secrets Act 1989 (\u201cOSA\u201d)", "represented_by": "CAREY D. ; CURLING R. ; NORTON E.", "respondent": "GBR", "articles": "8;8-1;8-2;10;10-1;10-2;35;35-3-a", "strasbourg_caselaw": "A. and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 3455\/05, \u00a7 181, ECHR 2009;A. v. the Netherlands, no. 4900\/06, \u00a7 143, 20 July 2010;Akdivar and Others v. Turkey, 16 September 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 IV;Al-Skeini and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 55721\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 130-139, ECHR 2011;Anthony France and Others v. the United Kingdom (dec.), nos. 25357\/16, 25514\/16, 25552\/16 and 25597\/16, 26 September 2016;Association for European Integration and Human Rights and Ekimdzhiev v. Bulgaria, no. 62540\/00, 28 June 2007;Axel Springer AG v. Germany [GC], no. 39954\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 85-88, 7 February 2012;Ben Faiza v. France, no. 31446\/12, 8 February 2018;Bosphorus Hava Yollar\u0131 Turizm ve Ticaret Anonim \u015eirketi v. Ireland [GC], no. 45036\/98, \u00a7 165 ECHR 2005 VI;Burden v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 13378\/05, \u00a7 43, ECHR 2008;Chahal v. the United Kingdom, 15 November 1996, \u00a7 79, Reports 1996 V;Charron and Merle Montet v. France (dec), no. 22612\/15, \u00a7 30, 16 January 2018;Courtney v. Ireland (dec), no. 69558\/10, 18 December 2012;Demopoulos and Others v. Turkey (dec.) [GC], nos. 46113\/99, 3843\/02, 13751\/02, 13466\/03, 10200\/04, 14163\/04, 19993\/04 and 21819\/04, ECHR 2010;Goodwin v. the United Kingdom, 27 March 1996, Reports 1996 II;Gough v. the United Kingdom, no. 49327\/11, \u00a7 140, 28 October 2014;Heglas v. the Czech Republic, no. 5935\/02, \u00a7 74, 1 March 2007;Huvig v. France, 24 April 1990, Series A no. 176 B;Ireland v. the United Kingdom, 18 January 1978, Series A no. 25;Jaloud v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 47708\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 139 and 151 ECHR 2014;Klass and Others v. Germany, 6 September 1978, Series A no. 28;Kokkinakis v. Greece, 25 May 1993, \u00a7 40, Series A no. 260 A;Lawless v. Ireland (no. 3), 1 July 1961, \u00a7\u00a7 28\u201330, Series A no. 3;Leander v. Sweden, 26 March 1987, Series A no. 116;Liberty and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 58243\/00, 1 July 2008;Magee v. the United Kingdom, no. 28135\/95, \u00a7 50, ECHR 2000 VI;Malone v. the United Kingdom, 2 August 1984, Series A no. 82;McFarlane v. Ireland [GC], no. 31333\/06, \u00a7 107, 10 September 2010;MGN Limited v. the United Kingdom, no. 39401\/04, \u00a7\u00a7 140-155, 18 January 2011;Mustafa Sezgin Tanr\u0131kulu v. Turkey, no. 27473\/06, 18 July 2017;\u00d6calan v. Turkey [GC], no. 46221\/99, \u00a7 179, ECHR 2005 IV;Othman (Abu Qatada) v. United Kingdom, no. 8139\/09, \u00a7 183, ECHR 2012;Palomo S\u00e1nchez and Others v. Spain [GC], nos. 28955\/06, 28957\/06, 28959\/06 and 28964\/06, \u00a7 57, 12 September 2011;R.E. v. the United Kingdom, no. 62498\/11, 27 October 2015;Roemen and Schmit v. Luxembourg, no. 51772\/99, ECHR 2003-IV;Roman Zakharov v. Russia [GC], no. 47143\/06, ECHR 2015;Rotaru v. Romania [GC], no. 28341\/95, ECHR 2000 V;S. and Marper v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 30562\/04 and 30566\/04, ECHR 2008;Sanoma Uitgevers B.V. v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 38224\/03, 14 September 2010;Scoppola v. Italy (no. 2) [GC], no. 10249\/03, \u00a7 70, 17 September 2009;Sejdovic v. Italy [GC], no. 56581\/00, \u00a7 46, ECHR 2006 II;Szab\u00f3 and Vissy v. Hungary, no. 37138\/14, 12 January 2016;Trabelsi v. Belgium, no. 140\/10, \u00a7 117, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Uzun v. Germany, no. 35623\/05, ECHR 2010 (extracts);Valenzuela Contreras v. Spain, 30 July 1998, Reports 1998 V;Voskuil v. the Netherlands, no. 64752\/01, \u00a7 65, 22 November 2007;Vu\u010dkovi\u0107 and Others v. Serbia (preliminary objection) [GC], nos. 17153\/11 and 29 others, 25 March 2014;Weber and Saravia v. Germany (dec.), no. 54934\/00, ECHR 2006\u2011XI", "external_sources": "2015 Report of the European Commission for Democracy through Law (\u201cVenice Commission\u201d) on the Democratic Oversight of Signals Intelligence Agencies;2016 annual report of the Interception of Communications Commissioner", "conclusion": "Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression-{general} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Ale\u0161 Pejchal;Armen Harutyunyan;Kristina Pardalos;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Pauliine Koskelo;Ksenija Turkovi\u0107;Tim Eicke", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0913JUD005817013" }, "157": { "webcast_id": "5817013_07112017", "hearing_date": "2017-11-07 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Big Brother Watch and Others v. the United Kingdom (no. 58170\/13), Bureau of Investigative Journalism and Alice Ross v. the United Kingdom (no. 62322\/14) and 10 Human Rights Organisations and Others v. the United Kingdom (no. 24960\/15)", "hearing_type": "Chamber hearing", "appno": "62322\/14", "case_id": "001-150946", "case_name": "BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIVE JOURNALISM AND ALICE ROSS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-150946", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "LEIGH DAY & CO", "respondent": "GBR", "articles": "8;8-1;10;10-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Communicated", "separate_opinion": "", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "158": { "webcast_id": "5817013_07112017", "hearing_date": "2017-11-07 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Big Brother Watch and Others v. the United Kingdom (no. 58170\/13), Bureau of Investigative Journalism and Alice Ross v. the United Kingdom (no. 62322\/14) and 10 Human Rights Organisations and Others v. the United Kingdom (no. 24960\/15)", "hearing_type": "Chamber hearing", "appno": "24960\/15", "case_id": "001-210077", "case_name": "CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-210077", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2021-05-25 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 (\u201cRIPA\u201d) ; Interception of Communications Code of Practice (the \u201cIC Code\u201d)\n", "represented_by": "CAREY D. ; CURLING R. ; NORTON E.", "respondent": "GBR", "articles": "8;8-1;8-2;10;10-1;10-2;34", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Al-Skeini and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 55721\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 130-139, ECHR 2011;Amann v. Switzerland [GC], no. 27798\/95, \u00a7 69, ECHR 2000 II;Association for European Integration and Human Rights and Ekimdzhiev v. Bulgaria, no. 62540\/00, \u00a7 75, 28 June 2007;Centrum f\u00f6r r\u00e4ttvisa v. Sweden, no. 35252\/08, 19 June 2018;Goodwin v. the United Kingdom, no. 17488\/90, \u00a7 39, 27 March 1996;Heglas v. the Czech Republic, no. 5935\/02, \u00a7 74, 1 March 2007;Huvig v. France, 24 April 1990, Series A no. 176 B;Jaloud v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 47708\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 139 and 151 ECHR 2014;Kennedy v. the United Kingdom, no. 26839\/05, \u00a7 130, 18 May 2010;Klass and Others v. Germany, 6 September 1978, \u00a7\u00a7 55 and 56, Series A no. 28;Kruslin v. France, 24 April 1990, Series A no. 176 A;Leander v. Sweden, 26 March 1987, Series A no. 116;Liberty and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 58243\/00, 1 July 2008;Malone v. the United Kingdom, 2 August 1984, Series A no. 82;Nordisk Film & TV A\/S v. Denmark (dec.), no. 40485\/02, ECHR 2005 XIII;Roemen and Schmit v. Luxembourg, no. 51772\/99, \u00a7\u00a7 46 and 57, ECHR 2003 IV;Roman Zakharov v. Russia [GC], no. 47143\/06, ECHR 2015;Rotaru v. Romania [GC], no. 28341\/95, ECHR 2000 V;S. and Marper v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 30562\/04 and 30566\/04, ECHR 2008;S.M. v. Croatia [GC], no. 60561\/14, \u00a7 216, 25 June 2020;Sanoma Uitgevers B.V. v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 38224\/03, 14 September 2010;Segerstedt-Wiberg and Others v. Sweden, no. 62332\/00, \u00a7 120, ECHR 2006 VII;Szab\u00f3 and Vissy v. Hungary, no. 37138\/14, 12 January 2016;Valenzuela Contreras v. Spain, 30 July 1998, \u00a7 46, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 V;Voskuil v. the Netherlands, no. 64752\/01, \u00a7 65, 22 November 2007;Weber and Saravia v. Germany (dec.), no. 54934\/00, ECHR 2006\u2011XI;Wieser and Bicos Beteiligungen GmbH v. Austria, no. 74336\/01, \u00a7\u00a7 62-66, ECHR 2007 XI", "external_sources": "Report of the European Commission for Democracy through Law (the \u201cVenice Commission\u201d) on the Democratic Oversight of Signals Intelligence Agencies (2015);Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Security Act (\u201cFISA\u201d)\n", "conclusion": "Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Victim;Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression-{general} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression);Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression-{general} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression);No violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression-{general} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Ale\u0161 Pejchal;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Armen Harutyunyan;Carlo Ranzoni;Jon Fridrik Kj\u00f8lbro;Kristina Pardalos;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Marko Bo\u0161njak;M\u0101rti\u0146\u0161 Mits;Paul Lemmens;Pauliine Koskelo;Paulo Pinto De Albuquerque;Robert Spano;Vincent A. De Gaetano;Yonko Grozev;Gabriele Kucsko-Stadlmayer;Ksenija Turkovi\u0107;Tim Eicke", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0525JUD005817013" }, "159": { "webcast_id": "5817013_07112017", "hearing_date": "2017-11-07 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Big Brother Watch and Others v. the United Kingdom (no. 58170\/13), Bureau of Investigative Journalism and Alice Ross v. the United Kingdom (no. 62322\/14) and 10 Human Rights Organisations and Others v. the United Kingdom (no. 24960\/15)", "hearing_type": "Chamber hearing", "appno": "24960\/15", "case_id": "001-186048", "case_name": "CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-186048", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2018-09-13 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 3, "court": "4", "issue": "Chapter 12 and paragraphs 4.1-4.8, 6.22-6.24, 6.7, 7.2, 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, 7.6, 7.7, 7.8, 7.9, 7.15, 7.16, 7.17, 7.18 and 12.5 of the Interception of Communications Code of Practice (\u201cIC Code Practice\u201d) ; Chapter II and sections 5(3), 5(6), 8(1), 8(4), 9, 15, 15(2), 15(3), 15(4), 16, 16(2)(a), 16(2)(b), 16(3), 20, 22 and 81 of RIPA ; Paragraphs 2.24-2.27, 3.76 and 3.78-3.84 of the ACD Code ; Article 77-1-1 of the Criminal Procedure Code ; Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (\u201cPACE\u201d) ; Part 1 of Schedule 1 to the Data Protection Act 1998 ; Terrorism Act 2000 ; Section 19(2), (3), (4) and (5) of the Counter-Terrorism Act 2008 ; Investigatory Powers Act 2016 ; British-US Communication Intelligence Agreement of 5 March 1946 ; Security Services Act 1989 (\u201cSSA\u201d) ; Intelligence Services Act 1994 (\u201cISA\u201d) ; Section 1(1) of the Official Secrets Act 1989 (\u201cOSA\u201d)", "represented_by": "CAREY D. ; CURLING R. ; NORTON E.", "respondent": "GBR", "articles": "8;8-1;8-2;10;10-1;10-2;35;35-3-a", "strasbourg_caselaw": "A. and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 3455\/05, \u00a7 181, ECHR 2009;A. v. the Netherlands, no. 4900\/06, \u00a7 143, 20 July 2010;Akdivar and Others v. Turkey, 16 September 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 IV;Al-Skeini and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 55721\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 130-139, ECHR 2011;Anthony France and Others v. the United Kingdom (dec.), nos. 25357\/16, 25514\/16, 25552\/16 and 25597\/16, 26 September 2016;Association for European Integration and Human Rights and Ekimdzhiev v. Bulgaria, no. 62540\/00, 28 June 2007;Axel Springer AG v. Germany [GC], no. 39954\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 85-88, 7 February 2012;Ben Faiza v. France, no. 31446\/12, 8 February 2018;Bosphorus Hava Yollar\u0131 Turizm ve Ticaret Anonim \u015eirketi v. Ireland [GC], no. 45036\/98, \u00a7 165 ECHR 2005 VI;Burden v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 13378\/05, \u00a7 43, ECHR 2008;Chahal v. the United Kingdom, 15 November 1996, \u00a7 79, Reports 1996 V;Charron and Merle Montet v. France (dec), no. 22612\/15, \u00a7 30, 16 January 2018;Courtney v. Ireland (dec), no. 69558\/10, 18 December 2012;Demopoulos and Others v. Turkey (dec.) [GC], nos. 46113\/99, 3843\/02, 13751\/02, 13466\/03, 10200\/04, 14163\/04, 19993\/04 and 21819\/04, ECHR 2010;Goodwin v. the United Kingdom, 27 March 1996, Reports 1996 II;Gough v. the United Kingdom, no. 49327\/11, \u00a7 140, 28 October 2014;Heglas v. the Czech Republic, no. 5935\/02, \u00a7 74, 1 March 2007;Huvig v. France, 24 April 1990, Series A no. 176 B;Ireland v. the United Kingdom, 18 January 1978, Series A no. 25;Jaloud v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 47708\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 139 and 151 ECHR 2014;Klass and Others v. Germany, 6 September 1978, Series A no. 28;Kokkinakis v. Greece, 25 May 1993, \u00a7 40, Series A no. 260 A;Lawless v. Ireland (no. 3), 1 July 1961, \u00a7\u00a7 28\u201330, Series A no. 3;Leander v. Sweden, 26 March 1987, Series A no. 116;Liberty and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 58243\/00, 1 July 2008;Magee v. the United Kingdom, no. 28135\/95, \u00a7 50, ECHR 2000 VI;Malone v. the United Kingdom, 2 August 1984, Series A no. 82;McFarlane v. Ireland [GC], no. 31333\/06, \u00a7 107, 10 September 2010;MGN Limited v. the United Kingdom, no. 39401\/04, \u00a7\u00a7 140-155, 18 January 2011;Mustafa Sezgin Tanr\u0131kulu v. Turkey, no. 27473\/06, 18 July 2017;\u00d6calan v. Turkey [GC], no. 46221\/99, \u00a7 179, ECHR 2005 IV;Othman (Abu Qatada) v. United Kingdom, no. 8139\/09, \u00a7 183, ECHR 2012;Palomo S\u00e1nchez and Others v. Spain [GC], nos. 28955\/06, 28957\/06, 28959\/06 and 28964\/06, \u00a7 57, 12 September 2011;R.E. v. the United Kingdom, no. 62498\/11, 27 October 2015;Roemen and Schmit v. Luxembourg, no. 51772\/99, ECHR 2003-IV;Roman Zakharov v. Russia [GC], no. 47143\/06, ECHR 2015;Rotaru v. Romania [GC], no. 28341\/95, ECHR 2000 V;S. and Marper v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 30562\/04 and 30566\/04, ECHR 2008;Sanoma Uitgevers B.V. v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 38224\/03, 14 September 2010;Scoppola v. Italy (no. 2) [GC], no. 10249\/03, \u00a7 70, 17 September 2009;Sejdovic v. Italy [GC], no. 56581\/00, \u00a7 46, ECHR 2006 II;Szab\u00f3 and Vissy v. Hungary, no. 37138\/14, 12 January 2016;Trabelsi v. Belgium, no. 140\/10, \u00a7 117, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Uzun v. Germany, no. 35623\/05, ECHR 2010 (extracts);Valenzuela Contreras v. Spain, 30 July 1998, Reports 1998 V;Voskuil v. the Netherlands, no. 64752\/01, \u00a7 65, 22 November 2007;Vu\u010dkovi\u0107 and Others v. Serbia (preliminary objection) [GC], nos. 17153\/11 and 29 others, 25 March 2014;Weber and Saravia v. Germany (dec.), no. 54934\/00, ECHR 2006\u2011XI", "external_sources": "2015 Report of the European Commission for Democracy through Law (\u201cVenice Commission\u201d) on the Democratic Oversight of Signals Intelligence Agencies;2016 annual report of the Interception of Communications Commissioner", "conclusion": "Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression-{general} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Ale\u0161 Pejchal;Armen Harutyunyan;Kristina Pardalos;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Pauliine Koskelo;Ksenija Turkovi\u0107;Tim Eicke", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0913JUD005817013" }, "160": { "webcast_id": "5817013_07112017", "hearing_date": "2017-11-07 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Big Brother Watch and Others v. the United Kingdom (no. 58170\/13), Bureau of Investigative Journalism and Alice Ross v. the United Kingdom (no. 62322\/14) and 10 Human Rights Organisations and Others v. the United Kingdom (no. 24960\/15)", "hearing_type": "Chamber hearing", "appno": "24960\/15", "case_id": "001-159526", "case_name": "10 HUMAN RIGHTS ORGANISATIONS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-159526", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "WELSH J. ; WILLIAMS N. ; SCOTT M. ", "respondent": "GBR", "articles": "6;6-1;8;8-1;10;10-2;14", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Communicated", "separate_opinion": "", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "161": { "webcast_id": "7663911_18102017", "hearing_date": "2017-10-18 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Denisov v. Ukraine (no. 76639\/11)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "76639\/11", "case_id": "001-186216", "case_name": "CASE OF DENISOV v. UKRAINE", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-186216", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2018-09-25 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "", "represented_by": "GAVRON J. ; HALBAN A.", "respondent": "UKR", "articles": "6;6-1;8;8-1;35;35-3-a;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "A. v. Norway, no. 28070\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 63-64, 9 April 2009;Albert and Le Compte v. Belgium, 10 February 1983, \u00a7 29, Series A no. 58;Alexandre v. Portugal, no. 33197\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 54 and 55, 20 November 2012;Anheuser-Busch Inc. v. Portugal [GC], no. 73049\/01, \u00a7 64, ECHR 2007 I;Axel Springer AG v. Germany [GC], no. 39954\/08, \u00a7 83, 7 February 2012;B\u0103rbulescu v. Romania [GC], no. 61496\/08, ECHR 2017 (extracts);Bayatyan v. Armenia [GC], no. 23459\/03, \u00a7 135, ECHR 2011;Bayer v. Germany, no. 8453\/04, 16 July 2009;B\u00e9dat v. Switzerland [GC], no. 56925\/08, \u00a7 72, ECHR 2016;Bigaeva v. Greece, no. 26713\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 22-25, 28 May 2009;Bochan v. Ukraine (no. 2) [GC], no. 22251\/08, \u00a7 42, ECHR 2015;Borysiewicz v. Poland, no. 71146\/01, \u00a7 51, 1 July 2008;Boulois v. Luxembourg [GC], no. 37575\/04, \u00a7 90, ECHR 2012;Bouyid v. Belgium [GC], no. 23380\/09, \u00a7 86, ECHR 2015;Bryan v. the United Kingdom, 22 November 1995, \u00a7\u00a7 44-47, Series A no. 335 A;Bykov v. Russia [GC], no. 4378\/02, \u00a7 114, 10 March 2009;Campagnano v. Italy, no. 77955\/01, \u00a7\u00a7 53 and 54, ECHR 2006 IV;Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin C\u00e2mpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848\/08, \u00a7 156, ECHR 2014;Cooper v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 48843\/99, \u00a7 104, ECHR 2003 XII;De Tommaso v. Italy [GC], no. 43395\/09, \u00a7 154, ECHR 2017 (extracts);Delfi AS v. Estonia [GC], no. 64569\/09, \u00a7 137, ECHR 2015;Dubetska and Others v. Ukraine, no. 30499\/03, \u00a7 105, 10 February 2011;Dzhidzheva Trendafilova v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 12628\/09, \u00a7 38, 9 October 2012;El Kaada v. Germany, no. 2130\/10, \u00a7 41, 12 November 2015;Enea v. Italy [GC], no. 74912\/01, \u00a7 103, ECHR 2009;Erkan v. Turkey (dec.), no. 29840\/03, 24 March 2005;Erm\u00e9nyi v. Hungary, no. 22254\/14, \u00a7\u00a7 30 and 31, 22 November 2016;Fadeyeva v. Russia, no. 55723\/00, \u00a7\u00a7 68 and 69, ECHR 2005 IV;Fern\u00e1ndez Mart\u00ednez v. Spain [GC], no. 56030\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 109-113, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Folger\u00f8 and Others v. Norway [GC], no. 15472\/02, \u00a7 112, ECHR 2007 III;G\u00e4fgen v. Germany [GC], no. 22978\/05, \u00a7 88, ECHR 2010;Gagliano Giorgi v. Italy, no. 23563\/07, \u00a7 56, ECHR 2012 (extracts);Ganci v. Italy, no. 41576\/98, \u00a7 25, ECHR 2003 XI;Gillberg v. Sweden [GC], no. 41723\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 64-74, 3 April 2012;Giusti v. Italy, no. 13175\/03, \u00a7 34, 18 October 2011;Grimkovskaya v. Ukraine, no. 38182\/03, \u00a7 58, 21 July 2011;Harabin v. Slovakia (dec.), no. 62584\/00, 29 June 2004;Hristovi v. Bulgaria, no. 42697\/05, \u00a7 109, 11 October 2011;Jalloh v. Germany [GC], no. 54810\/00, \u00a7 67, ECHR 2006 IX;Jankauskas v. Lithuania (no. 2), no. 50446\/09, 27 June 2017;Jeunesse v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 12738\/10, \u00a7 135, 3 October 2014;Kamenos v. Cyprus, no. 147\/07, \u00a7 88, 31 October 2017;K\u00e1roly Nagy v. Hungary [GC], no. 56665\/09, \u00a7 62, ECHR 2017;Kulykov and Others v. Ukraine, nos. 5114\/09 and 17 others, \u00a7\u00a7 118 and 132, 19 January 2017;Kyprianou v. Cyprus [GC], no. 73797\/01, \u00a7 119, ECHR 2005 XIII;Le Compte, Van Leuven and De Meyere v. Belgium, 23 June 1981, Series A no. 43;Lekavi\u010dien\u0117 v. Lithuania, no. 48427\/09, 27 June 2017;Lupeni Greek Catholic Parish and Others v. Romania [GC], no. 76943\/11, \u00a7 71, ECHR 2016;Maktouf and Damjanovi\u0107 v. Bosnia and Herzegovina [GC], nos. 2312\/08 and 34179\/08, \u00a7 49, ECHR 2013 (extracts);Martinie v. France [GC], no. 58675\/00, \u00a7 62, ECHR 2006-VI;Med\u017elis Islamske Zajednice Br\u010dko and Others v. Bosnia and Herzegovina [GC], nos. 17224\/11, \u00a7\u00a7 76 and 105-106, ECHR 2017;Micallef v. Malta [GC], no. 17056\/06, \u00a7 93, ECHR 2009;Morice v. France [GC], no. 29369\/10, \u00a7 78, ECHR 2015;Murray v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 10511\/10, \u00a7 134, ECHR 2016;Naidin v. Romania, no. 38162\/07, 21 October 2014;Niemietz v. Germany, 16 December 1992, \u00a7 29, Series A no. 251 B;Obst v. Germany, no. 425\/03, 23 September 2010;Ohneberg v. Austria, no. 10781\/08, 18 September 2012;Oleksandr Volkov v. Ukraine, no. 21722\/11, ECHR 2013;\u00d6zp\u0131nar v. Turkey, no. 20999\/04, 19 October 2010;Paluda v. Slovakia, no. 33392\/12, \u00a7 34, 23 May 2017;Pfeifer v. Austria, no. 12556\/03, \u00a7 35, 15 November 2007;Philis v. Greece (no. 2), 27 June 1997, \u00a7 45, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997 IV;Polanco Torres and Movilla Polanco v. Spain, no. 34147\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 40 and 44, 21 September 2010;Poposki and Duma v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, nos. 69916\/10 and 36531\/11, \u00a7 48, 7 January 2016;Pullar v. the United Kingdom, 10 June 1996, \u00a7 32, Reports 1996 III;Regner v. the Czech Republic [GC], no. 35289\/11, ECHR 2017;Roche v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 32555\/96, \u00a7 117, ECHR 2005 X;S. and Marper v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 30562\/04 and 30566\/04, \u00a7 66, ECHR 2008;\u015eahin Ku\u015f v. Turkey, no. 33160\/04, \u00a7\u00a7 34-37, 7 June 2016;Savitskyy v. Ukraine, no. 38773\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 143-145, 26 July 2012;Sch\u00fcth v. Germany, no. 1620\/03, ECHR 2010;Sidabras and D\u017eiautas v. Lithuania, nos. 55480\/00 and 59330\/00, \u00a7\u00a7 42-50, ECHR 2004 VIII;Singartiyski and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 48284\/07, \u00a7 54, 18 October 2011;Smith and Grady v. the United Kingdom, nos. 33985\/96 and 33986\/96, ECHR 1999 VI;Sodan v. Turkey, no. 18650\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 43-50, 2 February 2016;S\u00f6derman v. Sweden [GC], no. 5786\/08, \u00a7 126, ECHR 2013;Stummer v. Austria [GC], no. 37452\/02, \u00a7 82, ECHR 2011;Sturua v. Georgia, no. 45729\/05, \u00a7 27, 28 March 2017;Ta\u015fk\u0131n and Others v. Turkey, no. 46117\/99, \u00a7 133, ECHR 2004 X;Tsfayo v. the United Kingdom, no. 60860\/00, \u00a7\u00a7 42-43, 14 November 2006;Udovi\u010di\u0107 v. Croatia, no. 27310\/09, \u00a7 137, 24 April 2014;Varnava and Others v. Turkey [GC], nos. 16064\/90 and 8 others, \u00a7\u00a7 210-11, ECHR 2009;Zalli v. Albania, no. 52531\/07, 8 February 2011\n", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Administrative proceedings;Article 6-1 - Impartial tribunal;Independent tribunal);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "FALSE", "judges": "Alena Pol\u00e1\u010dkov\u00e1;Andr\u00e9 Potocki;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Carlo Ranzoni;Erik M\u00f8se;Ganna Yudkivska;Georgios A. Serghides;Guido Raimondi;Helena J\u00e4derblom;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Marko Bo\u0161njak;M\u0101rti\u0146\u0161 Mits;Robert Spano;Vincent A. De Gaetano;Yonko Grozev;Gabriele Kucsko-Stadlmayer", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0925JUD007663911" }, "162": { "webcast_id": "7663911_18102017", "hearing_date": "2017-10-18 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Denisov v. Ukraine (no. 76639\/11)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "76639\/11", "case_id": "001-140948", "case_name": "KULYKOV v. UKRAINE and 17 other applications", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-140948", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "", "respondent": "UKR", "articles": "6;6-1;7;7-1;8;8-1;8-2;10;10-1;13;14;P1-1;P1-1-1;P7-4", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "", "separate_opinion": "", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "163": { "webcast_id": "4016012_12072017", "hearing_date": "2017-07-12 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Zubac v. Croatia (no. 40160\/12)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "40160\/12", "case_id": "001-181821", "case_name": "CASE OF ZUBAC v. CROATIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-181821", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2018-04-05 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Article 119 of the Constitution ; Sections 40 \u00a7 3 and 382 (1) (1) and (2) of the Civil Procedure Act (Zakon o parni\u010dnom postupku)", "represented_by": "BAN I.", "respondent": "HRV", "articles": "6;6-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Al-Dulimi and Montana Management Inv. v. Switzerland [GC], no 5809\/08, \u00a7 78, ECHR 2016;Andrejeva v. Latvia [GC], no 55707\/00, \u00a7 97, ECHR 2009;Annoni di Gussola and Others v. France, nos. 31819\/96 and 33293\/96, \u00a7 54, ECHR 2000 XI;Baka v. Hungary [GC], no 20261\/12, \u00a7 117, ECHR 2016;B\u0105kowska v. Poland, no 33539\/02, \u00a7 54, 12 January 2010;B\u011ble\u0161 and Others v. the Czech Republic, no 47273\/99, \u00a7\u00a7 50-51 and 69, ECHR 2002 IX;Bellet v. France, 4 December 1995, \u00a7 36, Series A no 333-B;Bochan v. Ukraine (no 2) [GC], no 22251\/08, \u00a7 61, ECHR 2015;Brualla G\u00f3mez de la Torre v. Spain, 19 December 1997, Reports 1997 VIII;Bulfracht Ltd v. Croatia, no 53261\/08, 21 June 2011;Cornea v. the Republic of Moldova, no 22735\/07, \u00a7 24, 22 July 2014;Cudak v. Lithuania [GC], no 15869\/02, \u00a7 54, ECHR 2010;Dobri\u0107 v. Serbia, nos. 2611\/07 and 15276\/07, 21 June 2011;Dumitru Gheorghe v. Romania, no 33883\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 32-34, 12 April 2016;Dunn v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no 62793\/10, \u00a7 38, 23 October 2012;Edificaciones March Gallego S.A. v. Spain, 19 February 1998, \u00a7 35, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 I;Efstathiou and Others v. Greece, no 36998\/02, \u00a7 24 in fine, 27 July 2006;Egi\u0107 v. Croatia, no 32806\/09, 5 June 2014;E\u015fim v. Turkey, no 59601\/09, \u00a7 21, 17 September 2013;Examiliotis v. Greece (no 2), no 28340\/02, \u00a7 28, 4 May 2006;Fatma Nur Erten and Adnan Erten v. Turkey, no 14674\/11, \u00a7\u00a7 29-32, 25 November 2014;Freitag v. Germany, no 71440\/01, \u00a7\u00a7 39 42, 19 July 2007;Garc\u00eda Ruiz v. Spain [GC], no 30544\/96, \u00a7 28, ECHR 1999 I;Garzi\u010di\u0107 v. Mont\u00e9n\u00e9gro, no 17931\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 30 32, 21 September 2010;Golder v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1975, \u00a7\u00a7 28-36, Series A no 18;Hasan Tun\u00e7 and Others v. Turkey, no 19074\/05, 31 January 2017;Henrioud v. France, no 21444\/11, 5 November 2015;Jovanovi\u0107 v. Serbia, no 32299\/08, 2 October 2012;Kart v. Turkey [GC], no 8917\/05, \u00a7 79 in fine, ECHR 2009 (extracts);Kozlica v. Croatia, no 29182\/03, 2 November 2006;Lansch\u00fctzer GmbH v. Austria (dec.), no 17402\/08, 18 March 2014;Laskowska v. Poland, no 77765\/01, \u00a7\u00a7 60-61, 13 March 2007;Levages Prestations Services v. France, 23 October 1996, Reports 1996 V;Lorger v. Slovenia (dec.), no 54213\/12, \u00a7 22, 26 January 2016;Louli Georgopoulou v. Greece, no 22756\/09, \u00a7 48, 16 March 2017;Lupeni Greek Catholic Parish and Others v. Romania [GC], no. 76943\/11, ECHR 2016 (extracts);Ma\u0161irevi\u0107 v. Serbia, no 30671\/08, \u00a7 51, 11 February 2014;Mohr v. Luxembourg (dec.), no 29236\/95, 20 April 1999;Mur\u0161i\u0107 v. Croatia [GC], no 7334\/13, \u00a7 69, ECHR 2016;Nakov v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (dec.), no 68286\/01, 24 October 2002;Nowi\u0144ski v. Poland, no 25924\/06, \u00a7 34, 20 October 2009;Omerovi\u0107 v. Croatia (no 2), no 22980\/09, \u00a7 45, 5 December 2013;Perez v. France [GC], no 47287\/99, \u00a7 82, ECHR 2004 I;Platakou v. Greece, no 38460\/97, ECHR 2001 I;Prince Hans-Adam II of Liechtenstein v. Germany [GC], no 42527\/98, \u00a7 45, ECHR 2001 VIII;Roche v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 32555\/96, \u00a7 116, ECHR 2005 X;Sefer Y\u0131lmaz and Meryem Y\u0131lmaz v. Turkey, no 611\/12, \u00a7\u00a7 72-73, 17 November 2015;Shamoyan v. Armenia, no 18499\/08, \u00a7 29, 7 July 2015;\u0160imecki v. Croatia, no 15253\/10, \u00a7\u00a7 46-47, 30 April 2014;Sociedad An\u00f3nima del Ucieza v. Spain, no 38963\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 33-35, 4 November 2014;Sotiris and Nikos Koutras ATTEE v. Greece, no 39442\/98, ECHR 2000 XII;Stagno v. Belgium, no 1062\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 33-35, 7 July 2009;Stanev v. Bulgaria [GC], no 36760\/06, \u00a7 230, ECHR 2012;Uni\u00f3n Alimentaria Sanders S.A. v. Spain, 7 July 1989, \u00a7 35, Series A no 157;Walchli v. France, no 35787\/03, \u00a7 29, 26 July 2007;Wells v. the United Kingdom, no 37794\/05 (dec.), 16 January 2007;Yagtzilar and Others v. Greece, no 41727\/98, \u00a7 25, ECHR 2001 XII;Z and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 29392\/95, \u00a7 91, ECHR 2001 V", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Access to court)", "separate_opinion": "FALSE", "judges": "Alena Pol\u00e1\u010dkov\u00e1;Ale\u0161 Pejchal;Andr\u00e9 Potocki;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Ganna Yudkivska;Georgios A. Serghides;Guido Raimondi;Helena J\u00e4derblom;Jon Fridrik Kj\u00f8lbro;Julia Laffranque;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Luis L\u00f3pez Guerra;Nona Tsotsoria;Paul Lemmens;S\u00edofra O'Leary;Georges Ravarani;Ksenija Turkovi\u0107;Tim Eicke", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0405JUD004016012" }, "164": { "webcast_id": "4016012_12072017", "hearing_date": "2017-07-12 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Zubac v. Croatia (no. 40160\/12)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "40160\/12", "case_id": "001-167114", "case_name": "CASE OF ZUBAC v. CROATIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-167114", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2016-10-11 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "5", "issue": "", "represented_by": "BAN I.", "respondent": "HRV", "articles": "6;6-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Access to court)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Jon Fridrik Kj\u00f8lbro;Julia Laffranque;Paul Lemmens;Georges Ravarani;Ksenija Turkovi\u0107", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1011JUD004016012" }, "165": { "webcast_id": "4016012_12072017", "hearing_date": "2017-07-12 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Zubac v. Croatia (no. 40160\/12)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "40160\/12", "case_id": "001-153944", "case_name": "ZUBAC v. CROATIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-153944", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "BAN I.", "respondent": "HRV", "articles": "6;6-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Communicated", "separate_opinion": "", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "166": { "webcast_id": "5135707_14062017", "hearing_date": "2017-06-14 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Na\u00eft-Liman v. Switzerland (no. 51357\/07)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "51357\/07", "case_id": "001-181789", "case_name": "CASE OF NA\u00cfT-LIMAN v. SWITZERLAND", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-181789", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2018-03-15 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Article 41 of the Swiss Code of Obligations ; Section 3 of the Federal Act on Private International Law of 18 December 1987 (LDIP) (Forum of necessity)", "represented_by": "TRIAL INTERNATIONAL", "respondent": "CHE", "articles": "6;6-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Al-Dulimi and Montana Management Inv. v. Switzerland [GC], no 5809\/08, ECHR 2016;Anheuser-Busch Inv. v. Portugal [GC], no 73049\/01, \u00a7\u00a7 85-86, ECHR 2007\u2011I;Arlewin v. Sweden, no 22302\/10, \u00a7 142, 1 March 2016;Baka v. Hungary [GC], no 20261\/12, \u00a7 120, ECHR 2016;Bayatyan v. Armenia [GC], no 23459\/03, \u00a7 122, ECHR 2011;B\u011ble\u0161 and Others v. the Czech Republic, no 47273\/99, \u00a7 49, ECHR 2002 IX;Benthem v. the Netherlands, 23 October 1985, \u00a7 32, Series A no 97;E\u015fim v. Turkey, no 59601\/09, \u00a7 18, 17 September 2013;Golder v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1975, Series A no 18;H\u00e4m\u00e4l\u00e4inen v. Finland [GC], no 37359\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 72-75, ECHR 2014;Hornsby v. Greece, 19 March 1997, \u00a7\u00a7 40-45, Reports 1997 II;Howald Moor and Others v. Switzerland, nos. 52067\/10 and 41072\/11, \u00a7\u00a7 70-71, 11 March 2014;Kopp v. Switzerland, 25 March 1998, \u00a7 59, Reports 1998\u2011II;Kruslin v. France, 24 April 1990, \u00a7 29, Series A no 176\u2011A;Lupeni Greek Catholic Parish and Others v. Romania [GC], no. 76943\/11, \u00a7 71, ECHR 2016 (extracts)Magyar Helsinki Bizotts\u00e1g v. Hungary [GC], no 18030\/11, \u00a7 138, ECHR 2016;Nada v. Switzerland [GC], no 10593\/08, \u00a7 169, ECHR 2012;Neulinger and Shuruk v. Switzerland [GC], no 41615\/07, \u00a7 131, ECHR 2010;Nusret Kaya and Others v. Turkey, nos. 43750\/06, 43752\/06, 32054\/08, 37753\/08 and 60915\/08, \u00a7 38, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Sporrong and L\u00f6nnroth v. Sweden, 23 September 1982, \u00a7 81, Series A no 52;Stagno v. Belgium, no 1062\/07, \u00a7 25, 7 July 2009;Stanev v. Bulgaria [GC], no 36760\/06, \u00a7 230, ECHR 2012;Stubbings and Others v. the United Kingdom, 22 October 1996, \u00a7 50, Reports 1996 IV;Yabansu and Others v. Turkey, no 43903\/09, \u00a7 58, 12 November 2013", "external_sources": "Resolution 60\/147 of the General Assembly of the United Nations of 16 December 2005;Articles 31 \u00a7 3 (c) and 32 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties of 23 May 1969;Articles 5 \u00a7 2 and 14 of the United Nations Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment of 10 December 1984 (States Parties\u2019 jurisdiction in criminal matters and universal civil jurisdiction);General Comment no. 3 (2012) of the United Nations Committee against Torture on the Implementation of Article 14 by States parties (CAT\/C.GC\/3, 13 December 2012;Article 38 of the Statute of the International Court of Justice (ICJ);Article 16 of the United Nations Convention relating to the Status of Refugees (Access to courts);Institute of International Law, Tallinn Session Resolution 2015 entitled \u201cUniversal Civil Jurisdiction with regard to Reparation for International Crimes\u201d and its background report", "conclusion": "No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Access to court)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Ale\u0161 Pejchal;Andr\u00e9 Potocki;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Dmitry Dedov;Egidijus K\u016bris;Ganna Yudkivska;Georgios A. Serghides;Guido Raimondi;Helen Keller;Helena J\u00e4derblom;Jon Fridrik Kj\u00f8lbro;Kristina Pardalos;Krzysztof Wojtyczek;Ledi Bianku;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Neboj\u0161a Vu\u010dini\u0107;Paul Lemmens;Pauliine Koskelo;Pieter Van Dijk;Robert Spano;Yonko Grozev;Pere Pastor Vilanova", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0315JUD005135707" }, "167": { "webcast_id": "5135707_14062017", "hearing_date": "2017-06-14 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Na\u00eft-Liman v. Switzerland (no. 51357\/07)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "51357\/07", "case_id": "001-164470", "case_name": "CASE OF NAIT-LIMAN v. SWITZERLAND", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-164470", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2016-06-21 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 3, "court": "5", "issue": "", "represented_by": "MEMBREZ F.", "respondent": "CHE", "articles": "6;6-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Al-Adsani v. the United Kingdom ([GC], no 35763\/97, ECHR 2001 XI;Anheuser-Busch Inv. v. Portugal [GC], no 73049\/01, \u00a7\u00a7 85-86, ECHR 2007 I;Arlewin v. Sweden, no 22302\/10, \u00a7\u00a7 72 et seq., 1 March 2016;B\u011ble\u0161 and Others v. the Czech Republic, no 47273\/99, \u00a7 49, ECHR 2002 IX;Cudak v. Lithuania [GC], no 15869\/02, \u00a7 57, ECHR 2010;E\u015fim v. Turkey, no 59601\/09, \u00a7 18, 17 September 2013;Golder v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1975, Series A no 18;Howald Moor and Others v. Switzerland, nos. 52067\/10 and 41072\/11, 11 March 2014;Jones and Others v. the United Kingdom, nos. 34356\/06 and 40525\/06, 14 January 2014;Kopp v. Switzerland, 25 March 1998, \u00a7 59, Reports 1998 II;Kruslin v. France, 24 April 1990, \u00a7 29, Series A no 176 A;Nada v. Switzerland [GC], no 10593\/08, ECHR 2012;Neulinger and Shuruk v. Switzerland [GC], no 41615\/07, \u00a7 131, ECHR 2010;Nusret Kaya and Others v. Turkey, nos. 43750\/06, 43752\/06, 32054\/08, 37753\/08 and 60915\/08, \u00a7 38, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Stagno v. Belgium, no 1062\/07, \u00a7 25, 7 July 2009;Stanev v. Bulgaria [GC], no 36760\/06, \u00a7 230, ECHR 2012;Stubbings and Others v. the United Kingdom, 22 October 1996, \u00a7 50, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 IV;Yabansu and Others v. Turkey, no 43903\/09, \u00a7 58, 12 November 2013", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Access to court)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Egidijus K\u016bris;Helen Keller;Jon Fridrik Kj\u00f8lbro;Neboj\u0161a Vu\u010dini\u0107;Paul Lemmens;Robert Spano", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0621JUD005135707" }, "168": { "webcast_id": "1061316_23052017", "hearing_date": "2017-05-23 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Sharxhi and Others v. Albania (no. 10613\/16)", "hearing_type": "Chamber hearing", "appno": "10613\/16", "case_id": "001-179867", "case_name": "CASE OF SHARXHI AND OTHERS v. ALBANIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-179867", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2018-01-11 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 3, "court": "4", "issue": "Non Contractual Liability of the State Act (Law no. 8510 of 15 July 1999) ; Inspection of Buildings Act (Law no. 9780 of 16 July 2007) ; Civil Code\n", "represented_by": "SACCUCCI A.", "respondent": "ALB", "articles": "6;6-1;8;8-1;8-2;13;13+6-1;13+8;13+P1-1;35;35-1;35-3-a;41;P1-1;P1-1-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Akku\u015f v. Turkey, 9 July 1997, \u00a7 29, Reports 1997-IV;Almeida Garrett, Mascarenhas Falc\u00e3o and Others v. Portugal, nos. 29813\/96 and 30229\/96, \u00a7 54, ECHR 2000 I;Apostol v. Georgia, no. 40765\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 64-65, ECHR 2006\u2011XI;Boyle and Rice v. the United Kingdom, 27 April 1988, \u00a7 52, Series A no. 131;Brum\u0103rescu v. Romania [GC], no. 28342\/95, \u00a7\u00a7 76-78, ECHR 1999 VII;Burdov v. Russia (no. 2), no. 33509\/04, \u00a7 68, ECHR 2009;Burdov v. Russia, no. 59498\/00, \u00a7 35, ECHR 2002 III;Centro Europa 7 S.r.l. and Di Stefano v. Italy [GC], no. 38433\/09, \u00a7 82, ECHR 2012;Comingersoll S.A. v. Portugal [GC], no. 35382\/97, \u00a7 29, ECHR 2000\u2011IV;Dalban v. Romania [GC], no. 28114\/95, \u00a7 44, ECHR 1999-VI;De Wilde, Ooms and Versyp v. Belgium (Article 50), 10 March 1972, \u00a7\u00a7 15 16, Series A no. 14;Delijorgji v. Albania, no. 6858\/11, \u00a7 100, 28 April 2015;Demades v. Turkey, no. 16219\/90, 31 July 2003;Driza v. Albania, no. 33771\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 119-120, ECHR 2007 V (extracts);Fleri Soler and Camilleri v. Malta, no. 35349\/05, \u00a7 65, 26 September 2006;Frendo Randon and Others v. Malta, no. 2226\/10, 22 November 2011;Gjyli v. Albania, no. 32907\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 55-61, 29 September 2009;Guiso-Gallisay v. Italy (just satisfaction) [GC], no. 58858\/00, 22 December 2009;Hornsby v. Greece, 19 March 1997, \u00a7 40, Reports 1997 II;Iatridis v. Greece [GC], no. 31107\/96, \u00a7 66, ECHR 1999 II;Immobiliare Saffi v. Italy [GC], no. 22774\/93, \u00a7 49, ECHR 1999-V;Jahn and Others v. Germany [GC], nos. 46720\/99, 72203\/01 and 72552\/01, \u00a7\u00a7 91-94, ECHR 2005-VI;James and Others v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1986, \u00a7 37, Series A no. 98;Kaya v. Turkey, 19 February 1998, \u00a7 106, Reports 1998 I;Khalikova v. Azerbaijan, no. 42883\/11, \u00a7\u00a7 128-129, 22 October 2015;Kolona v. Cyprus, no. 28025\/03, \u00a7\u00a7 70-78, 27 September 2007;Kozac\u0131o\u011flu v. Turkey [GC], no. 2334\/03, 19 February 2009;K\u00fcbler v. Germany, no. 32715\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 60-66, 13 January 2011;Kud\u0142a v. Poland [GC], no. 31210\/96, \u00a7 152, ECHR 2000-XI;Loizidou v. Turkey (merits), no. 15318\/89, 18 December 1996, Reports 1996 VI;Luli and Others v. Albania, nos. 64480\/09 and 5 others, \u00a7\u00a7 77-84 and \u00a7\u00a7 114-119, 1 April 2014;Manushaqe Puto and Others v. Albania, nos. 604\/07 and 3 others, \u00a7\u00a7 33-35, 31 July 2012;Micallef v. Malta [GC], no. 17056\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 87-89, ECHR 2009;Mikheyev v. Russia, no. 77617\/01, \u00a7 155, 26 January 2006;Montanaro Gauci and Others v. Malta, no. 31454\/12, \u00a7\u00a7 41-48, 30 August 2016;Mullai and Others v. Albania (just satisfaction \u2013 striking out), no. 9074\/07, \u00a7 18, 18 October 2011;O\u2019Keeffe v. Ireland [GC], no. 35810\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 109-111, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Okyay and Others v. Turkey, no. 36220\/97, ECHR 2005 VII;Oliari and Others v. Italy, nos. 18766\/11 and 36030\/11, \u00a7 78, 21 July 2015;\u00d6nery\u0131ld\u0131z v. Turkey [GC], no. 48939\/99, ECHR 2004 XII;Papamichalopoulos and Others v. Greece, 24 June 1993, Series A no. 260 B;Paplauskien\u0117 v. Lithuania, no. 31102\/06, \u00a7 51, 14 October 2014;Paradiso and Campanelli v. Italy [GC], no. 25358\/12, \u00a7 169, ECHR 2017;Pavi\u0107 v. Croatia, no. 21846\/08, \u00a7 38, 28 January 2010;Sabanchiyeva and Others v. Russia, no. 38450\/05, \u00a7 153, ECHR 2013 (extracts);Salah v. the Netherlands, no. 8196\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 65-67, ECHR 2006 IX (extracts);Sargsyan v. Azerbaijan [GC], no. 40167\/06, \u00a7 217, ECHR 2015;Scordino v. Italy (no. 1) [GC], no. 36813\/97, ECHR 2006 V;Serghides and Christoforou v. Cyprus (just satisfaction), no. 44730\/98, \u00a7 29, 12 June 2003;Serkov v. Ukraine, no. 39766\/05, \u00a7 33, 7 July 2011;Serrilli v. Italy (just satisfaction), no. 77822\/01, \u00a7 17, 17 July 2008;Silva Barreira J\u00fanior v. Portugal, nos. 38317\/06 and 38319\/06, \u00a7 40, 11 January 2011;Soci\u00e9t\u00e9 Colas Est and Others v. France, no. 37971\/97, \u00a7 \u00a7 41-42, ECHR 2002 III;Sporrong and L\u00f6nnroth v. Sweden, 23 September 1982, \u00a7\u00a7 63 and 69-74, Series A no. 52;The Holy Monasteries v. Greece, 9 December 1994, \u00a7 71, Series A no. 301-A;Urb\u00e1rska Obec Tren\u010dianske Biskupice v. Slovakia, no. 74258\/01, \u00a7 115, ECHR 2007-XIII;Z and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 29392\/95, \u00a7 108, ECHR 2001-V;Zollmann v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 62902\/00, ECHR 2003-XII", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Preliminary objections joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;(Art. 35-1) Effective domestic remedy;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 13+6-1 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 6-1 - Access to court;Fair hearing;Article 6 - Administrative proceedings;Right to a fair trial);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Administrative proceedings;Article 6-1 - Access to court;Fair hearing);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for home);Violation of Article 13+8 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 8-2 - Interference;In accordance with the law;Article 8-1 - Respect for home;Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life);Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions);Violation of Article 13+P1-1 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions;Prescribed by law;Interference;Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property);Violation of Article 13+P1-1 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions;Interference;Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property);Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Deprivation of property;Peaceful enjoyment of possessions);Pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "FALSE", "judges": "Ale\u0161 Pejchal;Armen Harutyunyan;Kristina Pardalos;Ledi Bianku;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Pauliine Koskelo", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0111JUD001061316" }, "169": { "webcast_id": "1061316_23052017", "hearing_date": "2017-05-23 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Sharxhi and Others v. Albania (no. 10613\/16)", "hearing_type": "Chamber hearing", "appno": "10613\/16", "case_id": "001-162869", "case_name": "SHARXHI AND OTHERS v. ALBANIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-162869", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "", "respondent": "ALB", "articles": "6;6-1;8;8-1;13;14;P1-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Communicated", "separate_opinion": "", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "170": { "webcast_id": "5539113_22032017", "hearing_date": "2017-03-22 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Ramos Nunes De Carvalho e S\u00e1 v. Portugal (no. 55391\/13)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "55391\/13", "case_id": "001-187507", "case_name": "CASE OF RAMOS NUNES DE CARVALHO E S\u00c1 v. PORTUGAL", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-187507", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2018-11-06 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Section 168 of the Status of Judges Act (Law no. 21\/85 of 30 July 1985) ; Sections 2, 203, 212 \u00a7 3, 215 \u00a7 4, 216, 217 \u00a7 1, 218 \u00a7\u00a7 1 and 2, 266 and 268 \u00a7 4 of the Constitution", "represented_by": "RIBEIRO J.", "respondent": "PRT", "articles": "6;6-1;35;35-1;35-3-a;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "A. v. Finland (dec.), no 44998\/98, 8 January 2004;A. Menarini Diagnostics S.r.l. v. Italy, no 43509\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 63-64, 27 September 2011;Abuyeva and Others v. Russia, no 27065\/05, \u00a7 222, 2 December 2010;Adam and Others v. Germany (dec.), no 290\/03, 1 September 2005;Albert and Le Compte v. Belgium, 10 February 1983, Series A no 58;Allan v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no 48539\/99, 28 August 2001;Allan Jacobsson v. Sweden (no 2), 19 February 1998, \u00a7 49, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 I;Andersson v. Sweden, no 17202\/04, 7 December 2010;Azinas v. Cyprus [GC], no 56679\/00, \u00a7 32, ECHR 2004-III;Baka v. Hungary [GC], no 20261\/12, ECHR 2016;Batur v. Turkey, (dec.), no 38604\/97, 4 July 2000;Biagioli v. San Marino (dec.), no 64735\/14, \u00a7\u00a7 51-57, 13 September 2016;Bistrovi\u0107 v. Croatia, no 25774\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 51-53, 31 May 2007;Ble\u010di\u0107 v. Croatia [GC], no 59532\/00, ECHR 2006-III;Brown v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no 38644\/97, 24 November 1998;Bryan v. the United Kingdom, 22 November 1995, \u00a7 45, Series A no 335-A;Buterlevi\u010di\u016bt\u0117 v. Lithuania, no 42139\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 52-54, 12 January 2016;Buzadji v. the Republic of Moldova [GC], no 23755\/07, \u00a7 70, ECHR 2016 (extracts);Capital Bank AD v. Bulgaria, no 49429\/99, \u00a7\u00a7 99-108, ECHR 2005-XII (extracts);Castillo Algar v. Spain, 28 October 1998, \u00a7 45, Reports 1998-VIII;Chevrol v. France, no 49636\/99, ECHR 2003 III;Costa v. Portugal (dec.), no 44135\/98, 9 December 1999;Di Giovanni v. Italy, no 51160\/06, \u00a7 35, 9 July 2013;Diennet v. France, 26 September 1995, Series A no 325-A;D\u00f6ry v. Sweden, no 28394\/95, \u00a7 37, 12 November 2002;Dru\u017estevn\u00ed z\u00e1lo\u017ena Pria and Others v. the Czech Republic, no 72034\/01, \u00a7 112, 31 July 2008;Duran and Others v. Turkey (dec.), no 38925\/97, 4 July 2000;Durand v. France (dec.), no 10212\/07, 31 January 2012;Durgun v. Turkey (dec.), no 40751\/98, 4 July 2007;Ekimdzhiev v. Bulgaria (dec.), no 47092\/99, 3 March 2005;Engel and Others v. the Netherlands, 8 June 1976, Series A no 22;Ezeh and Connors v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 39665\/98 and 40086\/98, \u00a7 82, ECHR 2003-X;F\u00e1bi\u00e1n v. Hungary [GC], no 78117\/13, 5 September 2017;Fazia Ali v. the United Kingdom, no 40378\/10, \u00a7 84, 20 October 2015;Fazliyski v. Bulgaria, no 40908\/05, \u00a7 59, 16 April 2013;Findlay v. the United Kingdom, 25 February 1997, \u00a7 73, Reports 1997-I;Fredin v. Sweden (no 2), 23 February 1994, \u00a7 22, Series A no 283 A;Galina Kostova v. Bulgaria, no 36181\/05, 12 November 2013;Garc\u00eda Ruiz v. Spain [GC], no 30544\/96, \u00a7 28, ECHR 1999\u2010I;Gautrin and Others v. France, 20 May 1998, \u00a7 42, Reports 1998-III;G\u00f6\u00e7 v. Turkey [GC], no 36590\/97, ECHR 2002-V;G\u00f6kden and Karacol v. Turkey, (dec.), no 40535\/98, 4 July 2000;Grande Stevens and Others v. Italy, nos. 18640\/10 and 4 others, 4 March 2014;Helmut Blum v. Austria, no 33060\/10, \u00a7 59, 5 April 2016;I.D. v. Bulgaria, no 43578\/98, 28 April 2005;J.L. v. France (dec.), no 17055\/90, 5 April 1995;Jussila v. Finland [GC], no 73053\/01, ECHR 2006-XIV;K. and T. v. Finland [GC], no 25702\/94, ECHR 2001-VII;Kamenos v. Cyprus, no 147\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 50-53, 31 October 2017;Kaplan and Karaca v. Turkey (dec.), no 40536\/98, 4 July 2000;Kingsley v. the United Kingdom [GC] no 35605\/97, ECHR 2002 IV;Kleyn and Others v. the Netherlands [GC], nos. 39343\/98 and 3 others, ECHR 2003-VI;Kudeshkina v. Russia, no 29492\/05, \u00a7 86, 26 February 2009;Kuri\u0107 and Others v. Slovenia [GC], no 26828\/06, \u00a7 382, ECHR 2012 (extracts);Kurnaz and Others v. Turkey (dec.), no 36672\/97, 7 December 2004;Kyprianou v. Cyprus [GC], no 73797\/01, ECHR 2005-XIII;Le Compte, Van Leuven and De Meyere v. Belgium, 23 June 1981, Series A no 43;Letin\u010di\u0107 v. Croatia, no 7183\/11, \u00a7\u00a7 46 and 55-67, 3 May 2016;Linde Falero v. Spain (dec.), no 51535\/99, 22 June 2000;Lundevall v. Sweden, no 38629\/97, \u00a7 39, 12 November 2002;Majski v. Croatia, no 33593\/03, \u00a7 34, 1 June 2006;Malhous v. the Czech Republic [GC], no 33071\/96, 12 July 2001;Margareti\u0107 v. Croatia, no 16115\/13, 5 June 2014;Martinie v. France [GC], no 58675\/00, ECHR 2006-VI;Mehmet Emin \u015eim\u015fek v. Turkey, no 5488\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 29-31, 28 February 2012;M\u00e9rigaud v. France, no 32976\/04, \u00a7 69, 24 September 2009;Messochoritis v. Greece (dec.), no 41867\/98, 15 June 2000;Micallef v. Malta [GC], no 17056\/06, ECHR 2009;Miller v. Sweden, no 55853\/00, 8 February 2005;Mocanu and Others v. Romania [GC], nos. 10865\/09 and 2 others, \u00a7 385, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Morice v. France [GC], no 29369\/10, 23 April 2015;Moullet v. France (dec.), no 27521\/04, 13 September 2007;M\u00fcller-Hartburg v. Austria, no 47195\/06, 19 February 2013;Nejdet S\u0327ahin and Perihan S\u0327ahin v. Turkey [GC], no 13279\/05, \u00a7 49, 20 October 2011;Nicoleta Gheorghe v. Romania, no 23470\/05, \u00a7 26, 3 April 2012;Nikolova and Vandova v. Bulgaria, no 20688\/04, \u00a7 59, 17 December 2013;Obermeier v. Austria, 28 June 1990, \u00a7\u00a7 66-70, Series A no 179;Oleksandr Volkov v. Ukraine, no 21722\/11, 9 January 2013, ECHR 2013;Oluji\u0107 v. Croatia, no 22330\/05, \u00a7 55, 5 February 2009;\u00d6nery\u0131ld\u0131z v. Turkey [GC], no 48939\/99, \u00a7\u00a7 141 and 149, ECHR 2004-XII;Ouendeno v. France (dec.), no 18441\/91, 2 March 1994;Paluda v. Slovakia, no 33392\/12, \u00a7\u00a7 33-34, 23 May 2017;Paroisse gr\u00e9co-catholique S\u00e2mb\u0103ta Bihor v. Romania (dec.), no 48107\/99, 25 May 2004;Pereira da Silva v. Portugal, no 77050\/11, \u00a7\u00a7 59-60, 22 March 2016;Perna v. Italy [GC], no 48898\/99, \u00a7\u00a7 23-24, ECHR 2003-V;Potocka and Others v. Poland, no 33776\/96, 4 October 2001, ECHR 2001-X;Prager and Oberschlick v. Austria, 26 April 1995, \u00a7 34, Series A no 313;Pullar v. the United Kingdom, 10 June 1996, \u00a7 32, Reports 1996-III;Radomilja and Others v. Croatia [GC], nos. 37685\/10 and 22768\/12, ECHR 2018;Ruiz Torija v. Spain, 9 December 1994, \u00a7\u00a7 29-30, Series A no 303 A;Sabri G\u00fcne\u015f v. Turkey [GC], no 27396\/06, 29 June 2012;Saccoccia v. Austria, no 69917\/01, \u00a7 73, 18 December 2008;Sacilor-Lormines v. France, no 65411\/01, 9 November 2006, ECHR 2006 XIII;Schuler-Zgraggen v. Switzerland, 24 June 1993, Series A no 263;Sigma Radio Television Ltd v. Cyprus, nos. 32181\/04 and 35122\/05, 21 July 2011;Speil v. Austria (dec.), no 42057\/98, 5 September 2002;Stafford v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 46295\/99, ECHR 2002-IV;Sturua v. Georgia, no 45729\/05, \u00a7 28, 28 March 2017;Terra Woningen B.V. v. the Netherlands, 17 December 1996, Reports 1996 VI;Tsanova-Gecheva v. Bulgaria, no 43800\/12, \u00a7\u00a7 90, 105 106 and 109, 15 September 2015;Tsfayo v. the United Kingdom, no 60860\/00, 14 November 2006;V.M. and Others v. Belgium (striking out) [GC], no 60125\/11, \u00a7 39, 17 November 2016;Varela Assalino v. Portugal (dec.), no 64336\/01, 25 April 2002;Vilho Eskelinen others v. Finland, [GC], no 63235\/00, \u00a7 62, ECHR 2007 II;Yildirim v. Turkey (dec.), no 40800\/98, 4 July 2000", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Six-month period;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Administrative proceedings;Disciplinary proceedings;Article 6-1 - Impartial tribunal;Independent tribunal);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Administrative proceedings;Disciplinary proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing;Public hearing);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Alena Pol\u00e1\u010dkov\u00e1;Andr\u00e1s Saj\u00f3;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Branko Lubarda;Carlo Ranzoni;Dmitry Dedov;Egidijus K\u016bris;Erik M\u00f8se;Ganna Yudkivska;Guido Raimondi;Helena J\u00e4derblom;Krzysztof Wojtyczek;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Neboj\u0161a Vu\u010dini\u0107;Nona Tsotsoria;Pauliine Koskelo;Paulo Pinto De Albuquerque;St\u00e9phanie Mourou-Vikstr\u00f6m;Vincent A. De Gaetano;Gabriele Kucsko-Stadlmayer;Ksenija Turkovi\u0107", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1106JUD005539113" }, "171": { "webcast_id": "5539113_22032017", "hearing_date": "2017-03-22 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Ramos Nunes De Carvalho e S\u00e1 v. Portugal (no. 55391\/13)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "55391\/13", "case_id": "001-164449", "case_name": "CASE OF RAMOS NUNES DE CARVALHO E S\u00c1 v. PORTUGAL", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-164449", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2016-06-21 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 3, "court": "7", "issue": "", "represented_by": "RIBEIRO J.", "respondent": "PRT", "articles": "6;6-1;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "A. Menarini Diagnostics S.r.l. v. Italy, no 43509\/08, \u00a7 64, 27 September 2011;B. and P. v. the United Kingdom, nos. 36337\/97 and 35974\/97, \u00a7 36, ECHR 2001\u2011III;Boulois v. Luxembourg [GC], no 37575\/04, \u00a7 90, ECHR 2012;Brudnicka and Others v. Poland, no 54723\/00, \u00a7 38, ECHR 2005-II;Capital Bank AD v. Bulgaria, no 49429\/99, \u00a7\u00a7 99-108, ECHR 2005\u2011XII (extracts);Chevrol v. France, no 49636\/99, \u00a7\u00a7 77-78, ECHR 2003\u2011III;Diennet v. France, 26 September 1995, \u00a7\u00a7 33-34, Series A no 325\u2011A;D\u00f6ry v. Sweden, no 28394\/95, \u00a7 37, 12 November 2002;Fazliyski v. Bulgaria, no 40908\/05, \u00a7 59, 16 April 2013;Fey v. Austria, 24 February 1993, \u00a7\u00a7 27, 28 and 30, Series A no 255-A;Findlay v. the United Kingdom, 25 February 1997, \u00a7 73, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-I;Garc\u00eda Ruiz v. Spain [GC], no 30544\/96, \u00a7 28, ECHR 1999\u2011I;Grande Stevens and Others v. Italy, nos. 18640\/10, 18647\/10, 18663\/10, 18668\/10 and 18698\/10, \u00a7 122, 4 March 2014;I.D. v. Bulgaria, no 43578\/98, \u00a7 45, 28 April 2005;Jurisic and Collegium Mehrerau v. Austria, no 62539\/00, \u00a7 65, 27 July 2006;Kingsley v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 35605\/97, \u00a7 43, ECHR 2002 IV;Kleyn and Others v. the Netherlands [GC], nos. 39343\/98, 39651\/98, 43147\/98 and 46664\/99, \u00a7 193, ECHR 2003-VI;Kyprianou v. Cyprus [GC], no 73797\/01, \u00a7 119, ECHR 2005\u2011XIII;Le Compte, Van Leuven and De Meyere v. Belgium, 23 June 1981, \u00a7 58, Series A no 43;Martinie v. France [GC], no 58675\/00, \u00a7\u00a7 39-40, ECHR 2006\u2011VI;Mehmet Emin \u015eim\u015fek v. Turkey, no 5488\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 28-31, 28 February 2012;Micallef v. Malta [GC], no 17056\/06, \u00a7 74, 15 October 2009;Morice v. France [GC], no 29369\/10, \u00a7 78, 23 April 2015;Nejdet \u015eahin and Perihan \u015eahin v. Turkey [GC], no 13279\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 49-50, 20 October 2011;Nikolova and Vandova v. Bulgaria, no 20688\/04, \u00a7\u00a7 67-76, 17 December 2013;Obermeier v. Austria, 28 June 1990, \u00a7\u00a7 66-70, Series A no 179;Oleksandr Volkov v. Ukraine, no 21722\/11, ECHR 2013;Oluji\u0107 v. Croatia, no 22330\/05, 5 February 2009;Pullar v. the United Kingdom, 10 June 1996, \u00a7 32, Reports 1996-III;Pursiheimo v. Finland (dec.), no 57795\/00, 25 November 2003;Ruiz Torija v. Spain, 9 December 1994, \u00a7\u00a7 29-30, Series A no 303\u2011A;Sacilor-Lormines v. France, no 65411\/01, \u00a7 62, ECHR 2006\u2011XIII;Saghatelyan v. Armenia, no 7984\/06, \u00a7 43, 20 October 2015;\u015eahin Karako\u00e7 v. Turkey, no 19462\/04, \u00a7 36, 29 April 2008;Stafford v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 46295\/99, \u00a7 78, ECHR 2002-IV;Terra Woningen B.V. v. the Netherlands, 17 December 1996, Reports 1996-VI;Tsfayo v. the United Kingdom, no 60860\/00, \u00a7 48, 14 November 2006;Varela Assalino v. Portugal (dec.), no 64336\/01, 25 April 2002;Vilho Eskelinen and Others v. Finland [GC], no 63235\/00, \u00a7 62, ECHR 2007-IV;Wettstein v. Switzerland, no 33958\/96, \u00a7 42, ECHR 2000\u2011XII\n\n", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Administrative proceedings;Disciplinary proceedings;Article 6-1 - Impartial tribunal;Independent tribunal;Public hearing);Damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Andr\u00e1s Saj\u00f3;Egidijus K\u016bris;Krzysztof Wojtyczek;Nona Tsotsoria;Paulo Pinto De Albuquerque;Vincent A. De Gaetano;Gabriele Kucsko-Stadlmayer", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0621JUD005539113" }, "172": { "webcast_id": "7250813_08032017", "hearing_date": "2017-03-08 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Merabishvili v. Georgia (no. 72508\/13)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "72508\/13", "case_id": "001-178753", "case_name": "CASE OF MERABISHVILI v. GEORGIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-178753", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2017-11-28 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Article 18 \u00a7\u00a7 1 and 6 of the Constitution ; Articles 171 \u00a7\u00a7 1, 2 and 3, 205 \u00a7 2, 206 \u00a7 6 and 207 of the Code of Criminal Procedure\n", "represented_by": "LEACH P. ; SAWYER J.", "respondent": "GEO", "articles": "5;5-1;5-3;18;18+5-1;35;35-1;35-4;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "A and B v. Norway [GC], nos. 24130\/11 and 29758\/11, \u00a7 133, ECHR 2016;A. and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 3455\/05, \u00a7 171, ECHR 2009;A.A. v. the United Kingdom, no. 8000\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 52-71, 20 September 2011;Abdulaziz, Cabales and Balkandali v. the United Kingdom, 28 May 1985, \u00a7 71, Series A no. 94;Airey v. Ireland, 9 October 1979, \u00a7 30, Series A no. 32;Airey v. Ireland (Article 50), 6 February 1981, \u00a7 13, Series A no. 41;Akdivar and Others v. Turkey, 16 September 1996, \u00a7 99, Reports 1996-IV;Akta\u015f v. Turkey, no. 24351\/94, \u00a7 272, ECHR 2003-V (extracts);Al Nashiri v. Poland, no. 28761\/11, \u00a7 411, 24 July 2014;Alekseyev v. Russia, nos. 4916\/07 and 2 others, \u00a7 69, 21 October 2010;Amuur v. France, 25 June 1996, \u00a7 50, Reports 1996-III;Artico v. Italy, 13 May 1980, \u00a7 30, Series A no. 37;Artner v. Austria, 28 August 1992, \u00a7 21, Series A no. 242-A;Arutyunyan v. Russia, no. 48977\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 92-93, 10 January 2012;Ashingdane v. the United Kingdom, 28 May 1985, \u00a7 44, Series A no. 93;Assanidze v. Georgia [GC], no. 71503\/01, ECHR 2004-II;Azimov v. Russia, no. 67474\/11, \u00a7\u00a7 163 and 165, 18 April 2013;Azinas v. Cyprus [GC], no. 56679\/00, \u00a7 32, ECHR 2004-III;Aziz v. Cyprus, no. 69949\/01, \u00a7 35, ECHR 2004-V;Baisuev and Anzorov v. Georgia, no. 39804\/04, \u00a7 60, 18 December 2012;Baka v. Hungary [GC], no. 20261\/12, \u00a7\u00a7 156-57, ECHR 2016;Baranowski v. Poland, no. 28358\/95, \u00a7\u00a7 51-56, ECHR 2000-III;Bayatyan v. Armenia [GC], no. 23459\/03, \u00a7 117, ECHR 2011;Beyeler v. Italy [GC], no. 33202\/96, \u00a7 129, ECHR 2000-I;Blokhin v. Russia [GC], no. 47152\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 102-03, ECHR 2016;Bouamar v. Belgium, 29 February 1988, \u00a7 50, Series A no. 129;Bozano v. France, 18 December 1986, \u00a7 61, Series A no. 111;Bozano v. Italy, no. 9991\/82, Commission decision of 12 July 1984, DR 39, p. 147, p. 157;Bozano v. Switzerland, no. 9009\/80, Commission decision of 12 July 1984, DR 39, p. 58, p. 70;Brogan and Others v. the United Kingdom, 29 November 1988, \u00a7\u00a7 52-53, Series A no. 145-B;Buzadji v. the Republic of Moldova [GC], no. 23755\/07, ECHR 2016 (extracts);Campbell and Cosans v. the United Kingdom (Article 50), 22 March 1983, \u00a7 14 (a), Series A no. 60;Cebotari v. Moldova, no. 35615\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 49-53, 13 November 2007;Chahal v. the United Kingdom, 15 November 1996, \u00a7 112, Reports 1996-V;Chassagnou and Others v. France [GC], nos. 25088\/94 and 2 others, \u00a7 89, ECHR 1999-III;Christian Democratic People\u2019s Party v. Moldova (no. 2), no. 25196\/04, \u00a7 19, 2 February 2010;Christian Democratic People\u2019s Party v. Moldova, no. 28793\/02, \u00a7 54, ECHR 2006-II;Ciulla v. Italy, 22 February 1989, \u00a7 38, Series A no. 148;Clooth v. Belgium, 12 December 1991, \u00a7 44, Series A no. 225;Cornea v. Romania (dec.), no. 13755\/03, \u00a7 51, 15 May 2012;Cyprus v. Turkey [GC], no. 25781\/94, \u00a7 206, ECHR 2001-IV;De Becker v. Belgium, no. 214\/56, Commission report of 8 January 1960, Series B no. 2, pp. 132-33, \u00a7 271;De Jong, Baljet and Van den Brink v. the Netherlands, 22 May 1984, Series A no. 77;De Wilde, Ooms and Versyp v. Belgium, 18 June 1971, \u00a7 65, Series A no. 12;Demir and Baykara v. Turkey [GC], no. 34503\/97, \u00a7\u00a7 76-77, ECHR 2008;Denmark, Norway, Sweden and the Netherlands v. Greece, nos. 3321\/67 and 3 others, Commission report of 5 November 1969, Yearbook 12, p. 112, \u00a7 225;Dudgeon v. the United Kingdom (Article 50), 24 February 1983, \u00a7 22, Series A no. 59;Dudgeon v. the United Kingdom, 22 October 1981, \u00a7 67, Series A no. 45;E.O. and V.P. v. Slovakia (dec.), nos. 56193\/00 and 57581\/00, 16 September 2003;Ekimdjiev v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 47092\/99, 3 March 2005;El-Masri v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia [GC], no. 39630\/09, \u00a7 152, ECHR 2012;Engel and Others v. the Netherlands, 8 June 1976, \u00a7\u00a7 93 and 104, Series A no. 22;Engel and Others v. the Netherlands, nos. 5100\/71 and 4 others, Commission report of 19 July 1974, Series B no. 20, p. 86, \u00a7\u00a7 191-92;Enhorn v. Sweden, no. 56529\/00, \u00a7 35, ECHR 2005-I;Eshonkulov v. Russia, no. 68900\/13, \u00a7 65, 15 January 2015;F\u00e1bi\u00e1n v. Hungary [GC], no. 78117\/13, \u00a7\u00a7 95-97, ECHR 2017 (extracts);Federation of Offshore Workers\u2019 Trade Unions v. Norway (dec.), no. 38190\/97, ECHR 2002-VI;Fedorenko v. Russia, no. 39602\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 48-50 and 54-55, 20 September 2011;Feldman v. Ukraine, nos. 76556\/01 and 38779\/04, \u00a7 73, 8 April 2010;Fox, Campbell and Hartley v. the United Kingdom, 30 August 1990, \u00a7 32, Series A no. 182;Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568\/12, \u00a7\u00a7 172-73, ECHR 2016 (extracts);Gafgaz Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 60259\/11, \u00a7\u00a7 107-08, 15 October 2015;Gal v. Ukraine, no. 6759\/11, \u00a7\u00a7 36-37, 16 April 2015;Gatt v. Malta, no. 28221\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 42 and 48, ECHR 2010;Gentilhomme, Schaff-Benhadji and Zerouki v. France, nos. 48205\/99 and 2 others, \u00a7 27, 14 May 2002;Georgia v. Russia (I) [GC], no. 13255\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 185-86, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Gigolashvili v. Georgia, no. 18145\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 31 and 35, 8 July 2008;Gillow v. the United Kingdom, 24 November 1986, \u00a7 54, Series A no. 109;Giorgi Nikolaishvili v. Georgia, no. 37048\/04, 13 January 2009;Golder v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1975, \u00a7 39 in fine, Series A no. 18;Gubkin v. Russia, no. 36941\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 111-14, 23 April 2009;Gusinskiy v. Russia, no. 70276\/01, \u00a7 55, ECHR 2004-IV;Guzzardi v. Italy, 6 November 1980, \u00a7 102, Series A no. 39;Hakobyan and Others v. Armenia, no. 34320\/04, \u00a7 123, 10 April 2012;Handyside v. the United Kingdom, 7 December 1976, \u00a7 64, Series A no. 24;Handyside v. the United Kingdom, no. 5493\/72, Commission report of 30 September 1975, Series B no. 22, p. 52, \u00a7\u00a7 174-75;Hassan v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 29750\/09, \u00a7 104, ECHR 2014;Helle v. Finland, 19 December 1997, \u00a7\u00a7 56-60, Reports 1997-VIII;Husayn (Abu Zubaydah) v. Poland, no. 7511\/13, \u00a7 411, 24 July 2014;Huseynli and Others v. Azerbaijan, nos. 67360\/11 and 2 others, \u00a7\u00a7 146-47, 11 February 2016;I.A. v. France, 23 September 1998, \u00a7\u00a7 105 and 110, Reports 1998-VII;I.J.L. and Others v. the United Kingdom, nos. 29522\/95 and 2 others, \u00a7 101, ECHR 2000-IX;Ibrahimov and Others v. Azerbaijan, nos. 69234\/11 and 2 others, \u00a7\u00a7 126-27, 11 February 2016;Ilgar Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 15172\/13, \u00a7\u00a7 90-99, 22 May 2014;Ilijkov v. Bulgaria, no. 33977\/96, \u00a7 86, 26 July 2001;Informationsverein Lentia and Others v. Austria, 24 November 1993, \u00a7\u00a7 31 and 33, Series A no. 276;International Bank for Commerce and Development AD and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 7031\/05, \u00a7 129, 2 June 2016;Ireland v. the United Kingdom, 18 January 1978, \u00a7 194, Series A no. 25;Iskandarov v. Russia, no. 17185\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 109-15 and 148-51, 23 September 2010;Ivanova and Cherkezov v. Bulgaria, no. 46577\/15, \u00a7 89, 21 April 2016;J.K. and Others v. Sweden [GC], no. 59166\/12, \u00a7\u00a7 91-98, ECHR 2016;Janowiec and Others v. Russia [GC], nos. 55508\/07 and 29520\/09, \u00a7 202, ECHR 2013;Jarzy\u0144ski v. Poland, no. 15479\/02, \u00a7 43, 4 October 2005;J\u0117\u010dius v. Lithuania, no. 34578\/97, ECHR 2000-IX;K. and T. v. Finland [GC], no. 25702\/94, ECHR 2001-VII;K.-F. v. Germany, 27 November 1997, Reports 1997-VII;Kafkaris v. Cyprus [GC], no. 21906\/04, \u00a7 117, ECHR 2008;Kakabadze and Others v. Georgia, no. 1484\/07, 2 October 2012;Kamasinski v. Austria, 19 December 1989, \u00a7 59, Series A no. 168;Kamma v. the Netherlands, no. 4771\/71, Commission report of 14 July 1974, Decisions and Reports (DR) 1, p. 4;Kandzhov v. Bulgaria, no. 68294\/01, \u00a7\u00a7 57-61, 6 November 2008;Karajanov v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, no. 2229\/15, \u00a7\u00a7 75-77, 6 April 2017;Kasparov v. Russia, no. 53659\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 73-74, 11 October 2016;Kasparov and Others v. Russia (no. 2), no. 51988\/07, \u00a7 55, 13 December 2016;Kemmache v. France (no. 3), 24 November 1994, \u00a7\u00a7 37 and 42, Series A no. 296-C;Kharchenko v. Ukraine, no. 40107\/02, \u00a7 74, 10 February 2011;Khayletdinov v. Russia, no. 2763\/13, \u00a7 82, 12 January 2016;Khodorkovskiy v. Russia, no. 5829\/04, \u00a7\u00a7 161 and 163, 31 May 2011;Khodorkovskiy and Lebedev v. Russia, nos. 11082\/06 and 13772\/05, \u00a7 525, 25 July 2013;Khudoyorov v. Russia, no. 6847\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 136-37, ECHR 2005-X (extracts);Khuzhin and Others v. Russia, no. 13470\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 117-18, 23 October 2008;K\u0131rlang\u0131\u00e7 v. Turkey, no. 30689\/05, \u00a7 54, 25 September 2012;Klass and Others v. Germany, 6 September 1978, \u00a7 68, Series A no. 28;Kleutin v. Ukraine, no. 5911\/05, \u00a7 105, 23 June 2016;Konstantin Markin v. Russia [GC], no. 30078\/06, \u00a7 124, ECHR 2012 (extracts);Koz\u0142owski v. Poland, no. 31575\/03, \u00a7 43, 13 December 2005;Krzysztofiak v. Poland, no. 38018\/07, \u00a7 48, 20 April 2010;Kucheruk v. Ukraine, no. 2570\/04, \u00a7 177, 6 September 2007;Kud\u0142a v. Poland [GC], no. 30210\/96, \u00a7 114, ECHR 2000-XI;Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772\/95, \u00a7 155, ECHR 2000-IV;L\u0103c\u0103tu\u015f and Others v. Romania, no. 12694\/04, \u00a7 100, 13 November 2012;Lawless v. Ireland (no. 3), 1 July 1961, p. 59, \u00a7 38, Series A no. 3;Letellier v. France, 26 June 1991, Series A no. 207;Lingens v. Austria, 8 July 1986, \u00a7 36, Series A no. 103;Logvinenko v. Russia, no. 44511\/04, \u00a7\u00a7 37-38, 17 June 2010;Luedicke, Belkacem and Ko\u00e7 v. Germany (Article 50), 10 March 1980, \u00a7 15, Series A no. 36;Lukanov v. Bulgaria, 20 March 1997, Reports 1997-II;Lukovi\u0107 v. Serbia, no. 43808\/07, \u00a7 54, 26 March 2013;Lutsenko v. Ukraine, no. 6492\/11, \u00a7\u00a7 67-73, 3 July 2012;Marckx v. Belgium, 13 June 1979, \u00a7 32, Series A no. 31;;Mathloom v. Greece, no. 48883\/07, \u00a7 39, 24 April 2012;Matznetter v. Austria, 10 November 1969, pp. 31-32, \u00a7 5, Series A no. 10;McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, 27 September 1995, \u00a7 221, Series A no. 324;McFeeley and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 8317\/78, Commission decision of 15 May 1980, DR 20, p. 44, p. 102, \u00a7 133;Medvedyev and Others v. France [GC], no. 3394\/03, \u00a7 69, ECHR 2010;Mikiashvili v. Georgia, no. 18996\/06, \u00a7 94, 9 October 2012;Minelli v. Switzerland, 25 March 1983, \u00a7 35, Series A no. 62;Mooren v. Germany [GC], no. 11364\/03, \u00a7 57, 9 July 2009;Murray v. the United Kingdom, 28 October 1994, \u00a7\u00a7 67-68, Series A no. 300-A;Mur\u0161i\u0107 v. Croatia [GC], no. 7334\/13, \u00a7 69, ECHR 2016;Mustafa (Abu Hamza) v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 31411\/07, \u00a7 34, 18 January 2011;N.C. v. Italy [GC], no. 24952\/94, \u00a7 44, ECHR 2002-X;Nachova and Others v. Bulgaria [GC], nos. 43577\/98 and 43579\/98, \u00a7 147, ECHR 2005-VII;Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204\/11, \u00a7 116-17, 4 December 2014;Nemtsov v. Russia, no. 1774\/11, \u00a7\u00a7 129-30, 31 July 2014;Nikolova v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 31195\/96, \u00a7 60, ECHR 1999-II;Nikula v. Finland, no. 31611\/96, \u00a7 38, ECHR 2002-II;Nolan and K. v. Russia, no. 2512\/04, \u00a7\u00a7 73-74, 12 February 2009;Nowak v. Ukraine, no. 60846\/10, \u00a7 58, 31 March 2011;O\u2019Hara v. the United Kingdom, no. 37555\/97, \u00a7\u00a7 34 and 36, ECHR 2001-X;OAO Neftyanaya Kompaniya Yukos v. Russia, no. 14902\/04, \u00a7\u00a7 663-66, 20 September 2011;Oates v. Poland (dec.), no. 35036\/97, 11 May 2000;\u00d6calan v. Turkey [GC], no. 46221\/99, \u00a7 206, ECHR 2005-IV;Odi\u00e8vre v. France [GC], no. 42326\/98, \u00a7 22, ECHR 2003-III;Oleksiy Mykhaylovych Zakharkin v. Ukraine, no. 1727\/04, \u00a7\u00a7 86-88, 24 June 2010;Olsson v. Sweden (no. 1), 24 March 1988, \u00a7 68, Series A no. 130;Open Door and Dublin Well Woman v. Ireland, 29 October 1992, \u00a7\u00a7 61-63, Series A no. 246-A;Opuz v. Turkey, no. 33401\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 184-90, ECHR 2009;Or\u0161u\u0161 and Others v. Croatia [GC], no. 15766\/03, \u00a7 144, ECHR 2010;Ostendorf v. Germany, no. 15598\/08, \u00a7 97, 7 March 2013;P. and S. v. Poland, no. 57375\/08, \u00a7 133, 30 October 2012;Pakelli v. Germany, 25 April 1983, \u00a7 47, Series A no. 64;Panchenko v. Russia, no. 45100\/98, \u00a7 105, 8 February 2005;Patsuria v. Georgia, no. 30779\/04, \u00a7 42, 6 November 2007;Perin\u00e7ek v. Switzerland [GC], no. 27510\/08, \u00a7 196 (iii), ECHR 2015 (extracts);Pletmentsev v. Russia, no. 4157\/04, \u00a7 43, 27 June 2013;Pshenichnyy v. Russia, no. 30422\/03, \u00a7 38, 14 February 2008;Ramishvili and Kokhreidze v. Georgia, no. 1704\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 106-10, 27 January 2009;Rasmussen v. Denmark, 28 November 1984, \u00a7 29, Series A no. 87;Rasmussen v. Poland, no. 38886\/05, \u00a7 30, 28 April 2009;Rasul Jafarov v. Azerbaijan, no. 69981\/14, \u00a7\u00a7 121-32, 17 March 2016;Refah Partisi (the Welfare Party) and Others v. Turkey [GC], nos. 41340\/98 and 3 others, \u00a7 137, ECHR 2003-II;Roman Petrov v. Russia, no. 37311\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 43-45, 15 December 2015;S.A.S. v. France [GC], no. 43835\/11, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Saadi v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 13229\/03, ECHR 2008;Sabri G\u00fcne\u015f v. Turkey [GC], no. 27396\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 25-31, 29 June 2012;Saghatelyan v. Armenia, no. 7984\/06, \u00a7 62, 20 October 2015;Saghinadze and Others v. Georgia, no. 18768\/05, \u00a7 137, 27 May 2010;S\u00e2mbata Bihor Greek Catholic Parish v. Romania (dec.), no. 48107\/99, 25 May 2004;Schwabe and M.G. v. Germany, nos. 8080\/08 and 8577\/08, \u00a7 72, ECHR 2011 (extracts);Scott v. Spain, 18 December 1996, \u00a7 59, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-VI;Sejdovic v. Italy [GC], no. 56581\/00, \u00a7 41, ECHR 2006-II;Shimovolos v. Russia, no. 30194\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 52-57, 21 June 2011;Sidiropoulos and Others v. Greece, 10 July 1998, \u00a7\u00a7 38-47, Reports 1998-IV;Sisojeva and Others v. Latvia (striking out) [GC], no. 60654\/00, \u00a7 129, ECHR 2007-I;Sitaropoulos and Giakoumopoulos v. Greece [GC], no. 42202\/07, \u00a7 64, ECHR 2012;Smirnova v. Russia, nos. 46133\/99 and 48183\/99, ECHR 2003-IX (extracts);\u0160neersone and Kampanella v. Italy, no. 14737\/09, \u00a7 90, 12 July 2011;Solovey and Zozulya v. Ukraine, nos. 40774\/02 and 4048\/03, \u00a7\u00a7 70 72, 27 November 2008;Sporrong and L\u00f6nnroth v. Sweden, 23 September 1982, \u00a7 76, Series A no. 52;Stamose v. Bulgaria, no. 29713\/05, \u00a7 32, ECHR 2012;Stec and Others v. the United Kingdom (dec.) [GC], nos. 65731\/01 and 65900\/01, \u00a7 48, ECHR 2005-X;St\u00f6gm\u00fcller v. Austria, 10 November 1969, p. 41, \u00a7 7, Series A no. 9;Stoichkov v. Bulgaria, no. 9808\/02, \u00a7 52, 24 March 2005;Stoll v. Switzerland [GC], no. 69698\/01, \u00a7\u00a7 54-62, ECHR 2007-V;Svinarenko and Slyadnev v. Russia [GC], nos. 32541\/08 and 43441\/08, \u00a7 85, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Tahsin Acar v. Turkey [GC], no. 26307\/95, \u00a7 247, ECHR 2004-III;T\u0103nase v. Moldova [GC], no. 7\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 164-70, ECHR 2010;Tchankotadze v. Georgia no. 15256\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 114-15, 21 June 2016;The Sunday Times v. the United Kingdom (no. 1), 26 April 1979, \u00a7 75, Series A no. 30;Thlimmenos v. Greece [GC], no. 34369\/97, \u00a7 40, ECHR 2000-IV;Times Newspapers Ltd and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 6538\/74, Commission report of 18 May 1977, Series B no. 28, p. 77, \u00a7\u00a7 263-65;Timishev v. Russia, nos. 55762\/00 and 55974\/00, \u00a7 53, ECHR 2005-XII;Timurta\u015f v. Turkey, no. 23531\/94, \u00a7 118, ECHR 2000-VI;Tymoshenko v. Ukraine, no. 49872\/11, \u00a7\u00a7 269-70, 30 April 2013;United Communist Party of Turkey and Others v. Turkey, 30 January 1998, \u00a7 62, Reports 1998-I;United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden-PIRIN and Others v. Bulgaria (no. 2), nos. 41561\/07 and 20972\/08, \u00a7 83, 18 October 2011;Uspaskich v. Lithuania, no. 14737\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 90-100, 20 December 2016;Van der Mussele v. Belgium, 23 November 1983, \u00a7 43, Series A no. 70;Va\u0161\u010denkovs v. Latvia, no. 30795\/12, \u00a7 42, 15 December 2016;Vereinigung Bildender K\u00fcnstler v. Austria, no. 68354\/01, \u00a7\u00a7 29-39, 25 January 2007;Vladimir Solovyev v. Russia, no. 2708\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 95-98, 24 May 2007;W. v. Switzerland, 26 January 1993, \u00a7 33 Series A no. 254-A;Weber v. Switzerland, 22 May 1990, \u00a7\u00a7 44-45, Series A no. 177;Weeks v. the United Kingdom, 2 March 1987, \u00a7 42, Series A no. 114;Wemhoff v. Germany, 27 June 1968, p. 25, \u00a7 15, Series A no. 7;Winterwerp v. the Netherlands, 24 October 1979, Series A no. 33;X and Y v. the Netherlands, no. 6202\/73, Commission decision of 16 March 1975, DR 1, p. 66, at p. 71;X v. Austria, no. 753\/60, Commission decision of 5 August 1960, Yearbook 3, p. 310;X v. the Netherlands, no. 5763\/72, Commission decision of 18 December 1973, Collection 45, p. 76, at pp. 83-84;X v. the United Kingdom (Article 50), 18 October 1982, \u00a7 24, Series A no. 55;Yeloyev v. Ukraine, no. 17283\/02, \u00a7 53, 6 November 2008;Yumak and Sadak v. Turkey [GC], no. 10226\/03, \u00a7 109 (iii), ECHR 2008;\u017ddanoka v. Latvia [GC], no. 58278\/00, \u00a7 115 (b), ECHR 2006-IV", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;(Art. 35-4) Rejection of application at any stage of the proceedings;Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Six-month period;No violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention);No violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention);No violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Reasonableness of pre-trial detention);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Reasonableness of pre-trial detention);Violation of Article 18+5-1 - Limitation on use of restrictions on rights (Article 18 - Restrictions for unauthorised purposes) (Article 5 - Right to liberty and security;Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Alena Pol\u00e1\u010dkov\u00e1;Andr\u00e1s Saj\u00f3;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Egidijus K\u016bris;Ganna Yudkivska;Georgios A. Serghides;Guido Raimondi;Helen Keller;Helena J\u00e4derblom;Iulia Motoc;Jean-Paul Costa;Jon Fridrik Kj\u00f8lbro;Kristina Pardalos;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Loukis Loucaides;Luzius Wildhaber;Nona Tsotsoria;Paulo Pinto De Albuquerque;Robert Spano;Vincent A. De Gaetano;Yonko Grozev;Georges Ravarani;Ksenija Turkovi\u0107;Pere Pastor Vilanova", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1128JUD007250813" }, "173": { "webcast_id": "7250813_08032017", "hearing_date": "2017-03-08 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Merabishvili v. Georgia (no. 72508\/13)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "72508\/13", "case_id": "001-163671", "case_name": "CASE OF MERABISHVILI v. GEORGIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-163671", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2016-06-14 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 3, "court": "7", "issue": "Articles 194 \u00a7\u00a7 1, 2205 \u00a7 2 and 206 \u00a7\u00a7 1, 8 and 9 of the CPP ", "represented_by": "LEACH Ph. ; KAKHIDZE O.", "respondent": "GEO", "articles": "5;5-1;5-1-c;5-3;18;18+5-1;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Assanidze v. Georgia [GC], no. 71503\/01, \u00a7 206, ECHR 2004-II;Baranowski v. Poland, no. 28358\/95, \u00a7 56, ECHR 2000 III;Cebotari v. Moldova, no. 35615\/06, \u00a7 49, 13 November 2007;Chitayev v. Russia, no. 59334\/00, 18 January 2007;G.K. v. Poland, no. 38816\/97, \u00a7 84, 20 January 2004;Galuashvili v. Georgia, no. 40008\/04, \u00a7 33-34, 17 July 2008;Ghavtadze v. Georgia, no. 23204\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 118 and 120, 3 March 2009;Gigolashvili v. Georgia, no. 18145\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 32-36, 8 July 2008;Giorgi Nikolaishvili v. Georgia, no. 37048\/04, 13 January 2009;Gusinskiy v. Russia, no. 70276\/01, \u00a7 75, ECHR 2004 IV;Ilgar Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 15172\/13, \u00a7\u00a7 142-143, 22 May 2014;Je\u010dius v. Lithuania, no. 34578\/97, \u00a7\u00a7 57-64, ECHR 2000 IX;Kharchenko v. Ukraine, no. 40107\/02, \u00a7 75, 10 February 2011;Khodorkovskiy v. Russia, no. 5829\/04, \u00a7 257, 31 May 2011;Khudoyorov v. Russia, no. 6847\/02, \u00a7 125, ECHR 2005 X (extracts);Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772\/95, \u00a7 153, ECHR 2000 IV;Lutsenko v. Ukraine, no. 6492\/11, \u00a7\u00a7 108-109, 3 July 2012;Mikiashvili v. Georgia, no. 18996\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 101-102, 9 October 2012;Nikolov v. Bulgaria, no. 38884\/97, \u00a7 73, 30 January 2003;Panchenko v. Russia, no. 45100\/98, \u00a7 107, 8 February 2005;Patsuria v. Georgia, no. 30779\/04, \u00a7 74, 6 November 2007;Ramishvili and Kokhreidze v. Georgia (dec.), no. 1704\/06, 27 June 2007;Saghinadze and Others v. Georgia, no. 18768\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 136-140, 27 May 2010;Smirnova v. Russia, nos. 46133\/99 and 48183\/99, \u00a7 63, ECHR 2003\u2011IX (extracts);Sta\u0161aitis v. Lithuania, no. 47679\/99, \u00a7 82, 21 March 2002;Tymoshenko v. Ukraine, no. 49872\/11, \u00a7 267, 30 April 2013", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "No violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Deprivation of liberty;Lawful arrest or detention);No violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Reasonableness of pre-trial detention);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Reasonableness of pre-trial detention);Violation of Article 18+5-1 - Limitation on use of restrictions on rights (Article 18 - Restrictions for unauthorised purposes) (Article 5 - Right to liberty and security;Article 5-1 - Deprivation of liberty;Lawful arrest or detention);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "FALSE", "judges": "Andr\u00e1s Saj\u00f3;Egidijus K\u016bris;Iulia Motoc;Nona Tsotsoria;Paulo Pinto De Albuquerque;Vincent A. De Gaetano", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0614JUD007250813" }, "174": { "webcast_id": "7250813_08032017", "hearing_date": "2017-03-08 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Merabishvili v. Georgia (no. 72508\/13)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "72508\/13", "case_id": "001-142808", "case_name": "MERABISHVILI v. GEORGIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-142808", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "KAKHIDZE O.", "respondent": "GEO", "articles": "5;5-1;5-3;5-4;18", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "", "separate_opinion": "", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "175": { "webcast_id": "5640212_08022017", "hearing_date": "2017-02-08 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Correia de Matos v. Portugal (no. 56402\/12)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "56402\/12", "case_id": "001-182243", "case_name": "CASE OF CORREIA DE MATOS v. PORTUGAL", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-182243", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2018-04-04 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Articles 32 and 52 of the Constitution ; Preamble and Articles 61, 62, 64, 66 and 361 \u00a7 1 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CCP) ; Law no. 59\/98 of 25 August 1998 ; Law no. 48\/2007 of 29 August 2007 \n", "represented_by": "", "respondent": "PRT", "articles": "6;6+6-3-c;6-1;6-3-c", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Al-Adsani v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 35763\/97, \u00a7 55, ECHR 2001 XI;Andrejeva v. Latvia [GC], no. 55707\/00, \u00a7 97, ECHR 2009;Animal Defenders International v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 48876\/08, \u00a7 108, ECHR 2013 (extracts);Breukhoven v. the Czech Republic, no. 44438\/06, \u00a7 60, 21 July 2011;Brualla G\u00f3mez de la Torre v. Spain, 19 December 1997, \u00a7 37, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997 VIII;Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin C\u00e2mpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848\/08, \u00a7 101, ECHR 2014;Correia de Matos v. Portugal (dec.), no. 48188\/99, ECHR 2001 XII;Coutant v. France (dec.), no. 17155\/03, 24 January 2008;Croissant v. Germany, 25 September 1992, \u00a7 27, Series A no. 237 B;Dvorski v. Croatia [GC], no. 25703\/11, ECHR 2015;Fogarty v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 37112\/97, \u00a7 35, ECHR 2001 XI (extracts);Garib v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 43494\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 137-138, 6 November 2017;G\u00fcney v. Sweden (dec.), no. 40768\/06, 17 June 2008;Hatton and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 36022\/97, \u00a7 97, ECHR 2003 VIII;Ibrahim and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 50541\/08, 50571\/08, 50573\/08 and 40351\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 249-251, ECHR 2016;Jankauskas v. Lithuania (no. 2), no. 50446\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 74-75, 27 June 2017;Jeme\u013cjanovs v. Latvia, no. 37364\/05, \u00a7 89, 6 October 2016;Karpetas v. Greece, no. 6086\/10, \u00a7 78, 30 October 2012;Kyprianou v. Cyprus [GC], no. 73797\/01, \u00a7\u00a7 173-75, ECHR 2005 XIII;Magyar Helsinki Bizotts\u00e1g v. Hungary [GC], no. 18030\/11, \u00a7\u00a7 138-41 and 143, ECHR 2016;Mamatkulov and Askarov v. Turkey [GC], nos. 46827\/99 and 46951\/99, \u00a7\u00a7 114 and 124, ECHR 2005 I;Mayzit v. Russia, no. 63378\/00, \u00a7 65, 20 January 2005;Meftah and Others v. France [GC], nos. 32911\/96 and 2 others, \u00a7 40, ECHR 2002 VII;Mikhaylova v. Russia, no. 46998\/08, \u00a7 79, 19 November 2015;Morice v. France [GC], no. 29369\/10, \u00a7 132-139, ECHR 2015;Nada v. Switzerland [GC], no. 10593\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 188 and 194, ECHR 2012;Perin\u00e7ek v. Switzerland [GC], no. 27510\/08, \u00a7 136, ECHR 2015 (extracts);Quaranta v. Switzerland, 24 May 1991, \u00a7\u00a7 32-36, Series A no. 205;Roman Zakharov v. Russia [GC], no. 47143\/06, \u00a7 164, ECHR 2015;S.H. and Others v. Austria [GC], no. 57813\/00, \u00a7 97, ECHR 2011;Sakhnovskiy v. Russia [GC], no. 21272\/03, \u00a7 95, 2 November 2010;Sejdovic v. Italy [GC], no. 56581\/00, \u00a7 86, ECHR 2006 II;Simeonovi v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 21980\/04, \u00a7\u00a7 110-115, ECHR 2017 (extracts);Thorgeirson v. Iceland, no. 13778\/88, Commission decision of 14 March 1990;Visti\u0146\u0161 and Perepjolkins v. Latvia [GC], no. 71243\/01, \u00a7 98, 25 October 2012;Weber v. Switzerland, no. 24501\/94, Commission decision of 17 May 1995;X v. Finland, no. 34806\/04, \u00a7 182, ECHR 2012 (extracts);X. v. Norway, no. 5923\/72, Commission decision of 30 May 1975, Decisions and Reports (DR) 3, p. 44;Zdravko Stanev v. Bulgaria, no. 32238\/04, \u00a7 38, 6 November 2012", "external_sources": "Article 14 \u00a7 3 (d) of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR);Article 31 \u00a7 3 (c) of the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties;Articles 3, paragraph 4 and 9 of the Directive 2013\/48\/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2013 on the right of access to a lawyer in criminal proceedings and in European arrest warrant proceedings, and on the right to have a third party informed upon deprivation of liberty and to communicate with third persons and with consular authorities while deprived of liberty, which entered into force in November 2013 (see OJ 2013 L 294, pp. 1 to 12) and was to be transposed by the EU Member States by 27 November 2016;Articles 47(2) and 48(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights\n", "conclusion": "No violation of Article 6+6-3-c - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing;Equality of arms;Article 6-3-c - Defence in person) (Article 6 - Right to a fair trial;Article 6-3-c - Defence in person;Legal assistance of own choosing)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Ale\u0161 Pejchal;Andr\u00e1s Saj\u00f3;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Guido Raimondi;Helena J\u00e4derblom;Iulia Motoc;Krzysztof Wojtyczek;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Marko Bo\u0161njak;M\u0101rti\u0146\u0161 Mits;Nona Tsotsoria;Paulo Pinto De Albuquerque;S\u00edofra O'Leary;Vincent A. De Gaetano;Gabriele Kucsko-Stadlmayer", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0404JUD005640212" }, "176": { "webcast_id": "4349409_25012017", "hearing_date": "2017-01-25 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Garib v. the Netherlands (no. 43494\/09)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "43494\/09", "case_id": "001-177406", "case_name": "CASE OF GARIB v. THE NETHERLANDS", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-177406", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2017-11-06 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Sections 5(2), 6(2), 7(1)(b) and 17 of the Inner City Problems (Special Measures) Act", "represented_by": "WIJLING R.S.", "respondent": "NLD", "articles": "P4-2;P4-2-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Al-Dulimi and Montana Management Inc. v. Switzerland [GC], no. 5809\/08, \u00a7 78, ECHR 2016;Andrejeva v. Latvia [GC], no. 55707\/00, \u00a7 83, ECHR 2009;Animal Defenders International v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 48876\/08, \u00a7 108, ECHR 2013 (extracts);Ayangil and Others v. Turkey, no. 33294\/03, \u00a7 50, 6 December 2011;Ble\u010di\u0107 v. Croatia [GC], no. 59532\/00, \u00a7 67, ECHR 2006 III;Burden v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 13378\/05, \u00a7 33, ECHR 2008;Carson and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 42184\/05, \u00a7 61, ECHR 2010;Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin C\u00e2mpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848\/08, \u00a7 101, ECHR 2014;Chapman v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 27238\/95, \u00a7 104, ECHR 2001 I;Codona v. United Kingdom (dec.), no. 485\/05, 7 February 2006;D.H. and Others v. the Czech Republic [GC], no. 57325\/00, \u00a7 109, ECHR 2007 IV;Dubsk\u00e1 and Krejzov\u00e1 v. the Czech Republic [GC], nos. 28859\/11 and 28473\/12, \u00a7 179, ECHR 2016;Evans v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 6339\/05, \u00a7 91, ECHR 2007 I;Gherghina v. Romania (dec.) [GC], no. 42219\/07, \u00a7 59, 9 July 2015;Golder v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1975, \u00a7 39 in fine, Series A no. 18;Gorraiz Lizarraga and Others v. Spain, no. 62543\/00, \u00a7 70, ECHR 2004 III;Hatton and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 36022\/97, \u00a7 97, ECHR 2003 VIII;Hutten-Czapska v. Poland [GC], no. 35014\/97, \u00a7 166, ECHR 2006 VIII;James and Others v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1986, \u00a7 51, Series A no. 98;K. and T. v. Finland [GC], no. 25702\/94, \u00a7\u00a7 140-141, ECHR 2001-VII;Khoroshenko v. Russia [GC], no. 41418\/04, \u00a7 120, ECHR 2015;Kova\u010di\u0107 and Others v. Slovenia [GC], nos. 44574\/98, and 2 others, \u00a7\u00a7 194-195, 3 October 2008;Krone Verlag GmbH & Co. KG v. Austria (no. 4), no. 72331\/01, \u00a7 26, 9 November 2006;Landvreugd v. the Netherlands, no. 37331\/97, 4 June 2002;Lithgow and Others v. the United Kingdom, 8 July 1986, \u00a7 132, Series A no. 102;Mathew v. the Netherlands, no. 24919\/03, \u00a7 130, ECHR 2005 IX;Mellacher and Others v. Austria, 19 December 1989, \u00a7 53, Series A no. 169;Minelli v. Switzerland, 25 March 1983, \u00a7 35, Series A no. 62;Murray v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 10511\/10, \u00a7 86, ECHR 2016;N.C. v. Italy [GC], no. 24952\/94, \u00a7 56, ECHR 2002 X;Noack and Others v. Germany (dec.), no. 46346\/99, ECHR 2000-VI;Olivieira v. the Netherlands, no. 33129\/96, ECHR 2002 IV;Parrillo v. Italy [GC], no. 46470\/11, \u00a7 170, ECHR 2015;Perin\u00e7ek v. Switzerland [GC], no. 27510\/08, \u00a7 136, ECHR 2015 (extracts);Roman Zakharov v. Russia [GC], no. 47143\/06, \u00a7 164, ECHR 2015;S.H. and Others v. Austria [GC], no. 57813\/00, \u00a7 97, ECHR 2011;Sanoma Uitgevers B.V. v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 38224\/03, \u00a7\u00a7 47-48, 14 September 2010;Scoppola v. Italy (no. 2) [GC], no. 10249\/03, \u00a7 54, 17 September 2009;Sommerfeld v. Germany [GC], no. 31871\/96, \u00a7 41, ECHR 2003 VIII (extracts);Stec and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 65731\/01 and 65900\/01, \u00a7 52, ECHR 2006 VI;The Sunday Times v. the United Kingdom (no. 1), 26 April 1979, \u00a7\u00a7 49-50, Series A no. 30;Visti\u0146\u0161 and Perepjolkins v. Latvia [GC], no. 71243\/01, \u00a7 98, 25 October 2012;Von Hannover v. Germany (no. 2) [GC], nos. 40660\/08 and 60641\/08, \u00a7 116, ECHR 2012;Ward v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 31888\/03, 9 November 2004", "external_sources": "Report of the Committee of Experts to the Committee of Ministers, Report H (65) 16, 18 October 1965, \u00a7\u00a7 15 and 18", "conclusion": "No violation of Article 2 of Protocol No. 4 - Freedom of movement-{general} (Article 2 para. 1 of Protocol No. 4 - Freedom to choose residence)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Andr\u00e1s Saj\u00f3;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Branko Lubarda;Egbert Myjer;Egidijus K\u016bris;George Nicolaou;Guido Raimondi;Helen Keller;Helena J\u00e4derblom;Iulia Motoc;Johannes Silvis;Jon Fridrik Kj\u00f8lbro;Julia Laffranque;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Luis L\u00f3pez Guerra;Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska;Nona Tsotsoria;Paulo Pinto De Albuquerque;Vincent A. De Gaetano;Gabriele Kucsko-Stadlmayer;Georges Ravarani;Pere Pastor Vilanova", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1106JUD004349409" }, "177": { "webcast_id": "4349409_25012017", "hearing_date": "2017-01-25 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Garib v. the Netherlands (no. 43494\/09)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "43494\/09", "case_id": "001-161054", "case_name": "CASE OF GARIB v. THE NETHERLANDS", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-161054", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2016-02-23 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 3, "court": "6", "issue": "Inner City Problems (Special Measures) Act ; 2003 Housing Bye-law of the municipality of Rotterdam (2006 version)\n", "represented_by": "WIJLING R.S.", "respondent": "NLD", "articles": "8;P1-1;P4-2;P4-2-1;P4-2-3", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Animal Defenders International v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 48876\/08, ECHR 2013 (extracts);Ayangil and Others v. Turkey, no. 33294\/03, \u00a7 50, 6 December 2011;Ble\u010di\u0107 v. Croatia [GC], no. 59532\/00, \u00a7 67, ECHR 2006 III;Buckley v. the United Kingdom, 25 September 1996, \u00a7 76, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 IV;Burden v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 13378\/05, \u00a7 33, ECHR 2008;Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin C\u00e2mpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848\/08, \u00a7 101, ECHR 2014;Codona v. United Kingdom (dec.), no. 485\/05, 7 February 2006;Connors v. the United Kingdom, no. 66746\/01, \u00a7\u00a7 82-83, 27 May 2004;Guincho v. Portugal, 10 July 1984, \u00a7 39, Series A no. 81;Hutten-Czapska v. Poland [GC], no. 35014\/97, \u00a7 166, ECHR 2006 VIII;James and Others v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1986, \u00a7 51, Series A no. 98;Loizidou v. Turkey (preliminary objections), 23 March 1995, \u00a7 70, Series A no. 310;Maurice v. France [GC], no. 11810\/03, \u00a7 117, ECHR 2005\u2011IX;McCann v. the United Kingdom, no. 19009\/04, \u00a7 49, ECHR 2008;Mellacher and Others v. Austria, 19 December 1989, \u00a7 53, Series A no. 169;Noack and Others v. Germany (dec.), ECHR 2000-VI;O\u2019Keeffe v. Ireland [GC], no. 35810\/09, \u00a7 115, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Parrillo v. Italy [GC], no. 46470\/11, \u00a7 170, 27 August 2015;Pisano v. Italy (striking out) [GC], no. 36732\/97, \u00a7 48, 24 October 2002;S.A.S. v. France [GC], no. 43835\/11, \u00a7 129, ECHR 2014 (extracts);S.H. and Others v. Austria [GC], no. 57813\/00, ECHR 2011;Salah v. the Netherlands, no. 8196\/02, \u00a7 69, ECHR 2006 IX (extracts);Shefer v. Russia (dec.), no. 45175\/04, 13 March 2012;Van Anraat v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 65389\/09, \u00a7 75, 6 July 2010;Ward v. the United Kingdom, (dec.) no. 31888\/03, 9 November 2004;Winterstein and Others v. France, no. 27013\/07, \u00a7 159, 17 October 2013;\u017ddanoka v. Latvia [GC], no. 58278\/00, \u00a7\u00a7 112-115, ECHR 2006\u2011IV;Zehentner v. Austria, no. 20082\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 57-58, 16 July 2009", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "No violation of Article 2 of Protocol No. 4 - Freedom of movement-{general} (Article 2 para. 1 of Protocol No. 4 - Freedom to choose residence)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Branko Lubarda;George Nicolaou;Helen Keller;Helena J\u00e4derblom;Johannes Silvis;Luis L\u00f3pez Guerra;Pere Pastor Vilanova", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0223JUD004349409" }, "178": { "webcast_id": "4349409_25012017", "hearing_date": "2017-01-25 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Garib v. the Netherlands (no. 43494\/09)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "43494\/09", "case_id": "001-147735", "case_name": "GARIB v. THE NETHERLANDS", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-147735", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "WIJLING R. S.", "respondent": "NLD", "articles": "P4-2;P4-2-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "", "separate_opinion": "", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "179": { "webcast_id": "6149608_30112016", "hearing_date": "2016-11-30 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "B\u0103rbulescu v. Romania (no. 61496\/08)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "61496\/08", "case_id": "001-177082", "case_name": "CASE OF B\u0102RBULESCU v. ROMANIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-177082", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2017-09-05 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "", "represented_by": "DOMOKOS-HANCU E. ; JUVERDEANU O.", "respondent": "ROU", "articles": "8;8-1;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Amann v. Switzerland [GC], no. 27798\/95, \u00a7 44, ECHR 2000 II;Aydan v. Turkey, no. 16281\/10, \u00a7 69, 12 March 2013;Axel Springer AG v. Germany [GC], no. 39954\/08, \u00a7 95, 7 February 2012;Bigaeva v. Greece, no. 26713\/05, \u00a7 22, 28 May 2009;Blokhin v. Russia [GC], no. 47152\/06, \u00a7 91, ECHR 2016;Christine Goodwin v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 28957\/95, \u00a7 90, ECHR 2002-VI;Codarcea v. Romania, no. 31675\/04, \u00a7\u00a7 102-104, 2 June 2009;D.H. and Others v. the Czech Republic [GC], no. 57325\/00, \u00a7 109, ECHR 2007 IV;Demir and Baykara v. Turkey [GC], no. 34503\/97, \u00a7\u00a7 140 146, ECHR 2008;Fern\u00e1ndez Mart\u00ednez v. Spain [GC], no. 56030\/07, \u00a7 110, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Giuliani and Gaggio v. Italy [GC], no. 23458\/02, \u00a7 180, ECHR 2011 (extracts);Gustafsson v. Sweden, 25 April 1996, \u00a7 45, Reports 1996 II;Halford v. the United Kingdom, 25 June 1997, \u00a7\u00a7 44-45, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997 III;H\u00e4m\u00e4l\u00e4inen v. Finland [GC], no. 37359\/09, \u00a7 62, ECHR 2014;K. and T. v. Finland [GC], no. 25702\/94, \u00a7\u00a7 140-141, ECHR 2001 VII;K.A. and A.D. v. Belgium, nos. 42758\/98 and 45558\/99, \u00a7 83, 17 February 2005;K.U. v. Finland, no. 2872\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 43 and 49, ECHR 2008;Klass and Others v. Germany, 6 September 1978, \u00a7 50, Series A no. 28;K\u00f6pke v. Germany (dec.), no. 420\/07, 5 October 2010;Lupeni Greek Catholic Parish and Others v. Romania [GC], no. 76943\/11, \u00a7 187, ECHR 2016 (extracts);M.C. v. Bulgaria, no. 39272\/98, \u00a7 150, ECHR 2003 XII;Mustafa Tun\u00e7 and Fecire Tun\u00e7 v. Turkey [GC], no. 24014\/05, \u00a7 182, 14 April 2015;Niemietz v. Germany, 16 December 1992, \u00a7 29, Series A no. 251 B;Obst v. Germany, no. 425\/03, \u00a7\u00a7 40 and 43, 23 September 2010;Oleksandr Volkov v. Ukraine, no. 21722\/11, \u00a7\u00a7 165-166, ECHR 2013;\u00d6zp\u0131nar v. Turkey, no. 20999\/04, \u00a7 45 in fine, 19 October 2010;Palomo S\u00e1nchez and Others v. Spain [GC], nos. 28955\/06 and 3 others, ECHR 2011;Pretty v. the United Kingdom, no. 2346\/02, \u00a7 61, ECHR 2002-III;Roman Zakharov v. Russia [GC], no. 47143\/06, \u00a7 173, ECHR 2015;Saumier v. France, no. 74734\/14, \u00a7 60, 12 January 2017;Sch\u00fcth v. Germany, no. 1620\/03, \u00a7\u00a7 54 and 57, ECHR 2010;Sidabras and D\u017eiautas v. Lithuania, nos. 55480\/00 and 59330\/00, \u00a7 43, ECHR 2004 VIII;Smirnova v. Russia, nos. 46133\/99 and 48183\/99, \u00a7 95, ECHR 2003 IX (extracts);S\u00f6derman v. Sweden [GC], no. 5786\/08, \u00a7 85, ECHR 2013;Von Hannover v. Germany (no. 2) [GC], nos. 40660\/08 and 60641\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 95 and 98, ECHR 2012;Wretlund v. Sweden (dec.), no. 46210\/99, 9 March 2004;X and Y v. the Netherlands, 26 March 1985, \u00a7 23, Series A no. 91", "external_sources": "International Labour Office (ILO) issued a Code of Practice on the Protection of Workers\u2019 Personal Data (\u201cthe ILO Code of Practice\u201d) issued in 1997;\nDirective 95\/46\/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of the European Union of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data;Recommendation CM\/Rec(2015)5 of the Committee of Ministers to member States on the processing of personal data in the context of employment, which was adopted on 1 April 2015\n\n", "conclusion": "Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for correspondence;Respect for private life);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Andr\u00e1s Saj\u00f3;Andr\u00e9 Potocki;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Armen Harutyunyan;Dmitry Dedov;Egidijus K\u016bris;Guido Raimondi;Iulia Motoc;Jon Fridrik Kj\u00f8lbro;Ledi Bianku;Luis L\u00f3pez Guerra;Marko Bo\u0161njak;M\u0101rti\u0146\u0161 Mits;Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska;Neboj\u0161a Vu\u010dini\u0107;Nona Tsotsoria;Paul Lemmens;Paulo Pinto De Albuquerque;St\u00e9phanie Mourou-Vikstr\u00f6m;Vincent A. De Gaetano;Georges Ravarani;Tim Eicke", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0905JUD006149608" }, "180": { "webcast_id": "6149608_30112016", "hearing_date": "2016-11-30 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "B\u0103rbulescu v. Romania (no. 61496\/08)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "61496\/08", "case_id": "001-159906", "case_name": "CASE OF B\u0102RBULESCU v. ROMANIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-159906", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2016-01-12 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 3, "court": "7", "issue": "", "represented_by": "COSTINESCU D. ; JUVERDEANU O.", "respondent": "ROU", "articles": "8;8-1;35", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Amann v. Switzerland [GC], no. 27798\/95, \u00a7 43, ECHR 2000 II;Benediksd\u00f3ttir v. Iceland (dec.), no. 38079\/06, 16 June 2009;Bohlen v. Germany, no. 53495\/09, \u00a7 45, 19 February 2015;Botta v. Italy, 24 February 1998, \u00a7 35, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 I;Copland v. the United Kingdom, no. 62617\/00, \u00a7 41, ECHR 2007 I;E.B. v. France [GC], no. 43546\/02, \u00a7 43, 22 January 2008;Evans v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 6339\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 75 and 77, ECHR 2007 I;Fern\u00e1ndez Mart\u00ednez v. Spain [GC], no. 56030\/07, \u00a7 126, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Garc\u00eda Ruiz v. Spain [GC], no. 30544\/96, \u00a7\u00a7 28-29, ECHR 1999 I;Halford v. the United Kingdom, 25 June 1997, \u00a7\u00a7 44-45, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997 III;Jeunesse v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 12738\/10, \u00a7 106, 3 October 2014;K\u00f6pke v. Germany (dec.), no. 420\/07, 5 October 2010;Niemietz v. Germany, 16 December 1992, \u00a7 29, Series A no. 251 B;Oleksandr Volkov v. Ukraine, no. 21722\/11, ECHR 2013;Pay v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 32792\/05, 16 September 2008;Peev v. Bulgaria, no. 64209\/01, 26 July 2007;Von Hannover v. Germany (no. 2) [GC], nos. 40660\/08 and 60641\/08, \u00a7 57, ECHR 2012;Wieser and Bicos Beteiligungen GmbH v. Austria, no. 74336\/01, \u00a7\u00a7 59 and 63, ECHR 2007 IV;Yuditskaya and Others v. Russia, no. 5678\/06, \u00a7 30, 12 February 2015", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Remainder inadmissible;No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Positive obligations;Article 8-1 - Respect for correspondence;Respect for private life)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Andr\u00e1s Saj\u00f3;Egidijus K\u016bris;Nona Tsotsoria;Paulo Pinto De Albuquerque;Vincent A. De Gaetano", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0112JUD006149608" }, "181": { "webcast_id": "6149608_30112016", "hearing_date": "2016-11-30 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "B\u0103rbulescu v. Romania (no. 61496\/08)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "61496\/08", "case_id": "001-116001", "case_name": "BARBULESCU v. ROMANIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-116001", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "2012-12-18 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "N\/A", "respondent": "ROU", "articles": "8;8-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Communicated", "separate_opinion": "FALSE", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "182": { "webcast_id": "5608013_16112016", "hearing_date": "2016-11-16 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Lopes de Sousa Fernandes v. Portugal (no. 56080\/13)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "56080\/13", "case_id": "001-179556", "case_name": "CASE OF LOPES DE SOUSA FERNANDES v. PORTUGAL", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-179556", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2017-12-19 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Article 64 of the Portuguese Constitution ; Health Act approved by virtue of Law no. 48\/90 of 24 August 1990 ; Legislative Decree no. 11\/93 of 15 January 1993 which approved the National Health-care System Regulations ; Hospital Management Act established by Legislative Decree no. 19\/88 of 21 January 1988 and in force until 2002 ; General Regulations on Hospitals approved by Order no. 48358 of 27 April 1968 ; Legislative Decree no. 291\/93 of 24 August 1993 ; Medical Association Statute adopted by Legislative Decree no. 282\/77 of 5 July 1977 ; Article 3 of the Disciplinary Regulations for Doctors approved by Legislative Decree no. 217\/94 of 20 August 1994 ; Code of Ethics ; Infectious-Diseases Control Plan (1988-98) - Instruction issued by the Directorate General for Health on 23 October 1996 which approved the infectious-diseases control commissions ; National Infectious-Diseases Control Programme adopted on 14 May 1999 which replaced the Infectious-Diseases Control Plan (1988-98)", "represented_by": "S\u00c1 FERNANDES R.", "respondent": "PRT", "articles": "2;2-1;35;35-3-a;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Altu\u011f and Others v. Turkey, no. 32086\/07, \u00a7 73, 30 June 2015;Arskaya v. Ukraine, no. 45076\/05, 5 December 2013;Asiye Gen\u00e7 v. Turkey, no. 24109\/07, 27 January 2015;Aydo\u011fdu v. Turkey, no. 40448\/06, 30 August 2016;Baji\u0107 v. Croatia, no. 41108\/10, \u00a7 90, 13 November 2012;Balc\u0131 v. Turkey (dec.), no. 58194\/10, \u00a7 45, 20 October 2015;Bedir v. Turkey (dec.), no. 25070\/02, 2 October 2007;Beiere v. Latvia, no. 30954\/05, \u00a7 38, 29 November 2011;Besen v. Turkey (dec.), no. 48915\/09, \u00a7 38 in fine, 19 June 2012;Bilbija and Bla\u017eevi\u0107 v. Croatia, no. 62870\/13, \u00a7 107, 12 January 2016;Blokhin v. Russia [GC], no. 47152\/06, \u00a7 106, ECHR 2016;Bouyid v. Belgium [GC], no. 23380\/09, \u00a7 55, ECHR 2015;Buksa v. Poland (dec.), no. 75749\/13, \u00a7 13, 31 May 2016;Byrzykowski v. Poland, no. 11562\/05, \u00a7 105, 27 June 2006;Calvelli and Ciglio v. Italy [GC], no. 32967\/96, ECHR 2002 I;Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin C\u00e2mpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848\/08, ECHR 2014;Cevrio\u011flu v. Turkey, no. 69546\/12, \u00a7\u00a7 54-55, 4 October 2016;Cyprus v. Turkey [GC], no. 25781\/94, \u00a7 219, ECHR 2001 IV;Dodov v. Bulgaria, no. 59548\/00, \u00a7 86, 17 January 2008;E.M. and Others v. Romania (dec.), no. 20192\/07, \u00a7 50, 3 June 2014;Elena Cojocaru v. Romania, no. 74114\/12, 22 March 2016;Eugenia Laz\u0103r v. Romania, no. 32146\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 69-70, 16 February 2010;Fernie v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 14881\/04, 5 January 2006;Gheorghe v. Romania (dec.), no. 19215\/04, 22 September 2005;Glass v. the United Kingdom, (dec.), no. 61827\/00, 18 March 2003;Grega\u010devi\u0107 v. Croatia, no. 58331\/09, \u00a7 35, 10 July 2012;Hizb ut-tahrir and Others v. Germany (dec.), no. 31098\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 58-59, 12 June 2012;Hristozov and Others v. Bulgaria, nos. 47039\/11 and 358\/12, \u00a7 108, ECHR 2012 (extracts);Jeronovi\u010ds v. Latvia [GC], no. 44898\/10, \u00a7 75, ECHR 2016;J\u00f8rgensen and Others v. Denmark (dec.), no. 30173\/12, \u00a7 63, 28 June 2016;Kar\u00e1csony and Others v. Hungary [GC], no. 42461\/13, \u00a7 179, ECHR 2016 (extracts);Karpisiewicz v. Poland (dec.), no. 14730\/09, 11 December 2012;Kudra v. Croatia, no. 13904\/07, \u00a7 107, 18 December 2012;Lambert and Others v. France [GC], no. 46043\/14, \u00a7 140, ECHR 2015 (extracts);M. v. Turkey, no. 4050\/10 (dec), 15 October 2013;Mehmet \u015eent\u00fcrk and Bekir \u015eent\u00fcrk v. Turkey, no. 13423\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 104-105, ECHR 2013;Mihu v. Romania, no. 36903\/13, \u00a7\u00a7 67-68, 1 March 2016;Mocanu and Others v. Romania [GC], nos. 10865\/09, 45886\/07 and 32431\/08, \u00a7 260, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Mur\u0161i\u0107 v. Croatia [GC], no. 7334\/13, \u00a7 69, ECHR 2016;Musayeva and Others v. Russia (dec.), no. 74239\/01, 1 June 2006;Nagmetov v. Russia [GC], no. 35589\/08, \u00a7 62, 30 March 2017;Narin v. Turkey, no. 18907\/02, \u00a7 49, 15 December 2009;Nitecki v. Poland (dec.), no. 65653\/01, 21 March 2002;O\u2019Keeffe v. Ireland [GC], no. 35810\/09, \u00a7 121, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Oyal v. Turkey, no. 4864\/05, \u00a7 54, 23 March 2010;Panaitescu v. Romania, no. 30909\/06, 10 April 2012;Pentiacova and Others v. Moldova (dec.), no. 14462\/03, ECHR 2005 I;Perdig\u00e3o v. Portugal [GC], no. 24768\/06, \u00a7 87, 16 November 2010;Petrovi\u0107 v. Serbia, no. 40485\/08, \u00a7 60, 15 July 2014;Po\u010dkajevs v. Latvia (dec.), no. 76774\/01, 21 October 2004;Powell v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 45305\/99, ECHR 2000 V;Rezgui v. France (dec.), no. 49859\/99, ECHR 2000-XI;Rink\u016bnien\u0117 v. Lithuania (dec.), no. 55779\/08, 1 December 2009;Roman Zakharov v. Russia [GC], no. 47143\/06, \u00a7 164, ECHR 2015;Sabri G\u00fcne\u015f v. Turkey [GC], no. 27396\/06, \u00a7 29, 29 June 2012;Sayan v. Turkey, no. 81277\/12, \u00a7\u00a7 111-12, 11 October 2016;Schatschaschwili v. Germany [GC], no. 9154\/10, \u00a7 167, ECHR 2015;Sevim G\u00fcng\u00f6r v. Turkey (dec.), no. 75173\/01, 14 April 2009;Sieminska v. Poland, no. 37602\/97, 29 March 2001;\u0160ilih v. Slovenia [GC], no. 71463\/01, \u00a7 192, 9 April 2009;Skraskowski v. Poland (dec.), no. 36420\/97, 6 April 2000;Slimani v. France, no. 57671\/00, ECHR 2004 IX (extracts);Spyra and Kranczkowski v. Poland, no. 19764\/07, \u00a7 88, 25 September 2012;Trzepalko v. Poland (dec.), no. 25124\/09, \u00a7 24, 13 September 2011;Vasileva v. Bulgaria, no. 23796\/10, \u00a7 63, 17 March 2016;Vo v. France [GC], no. 53924\/00, ECHR 2004 VIII;Wiater v. Poland (dec.), no. 42290\/08, \u00a7 39, 15 May 2012;Z v. Poland, no. 46132\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 110-12, 13 November 2012;Zafer \u00d6zt\u00fcrk v. Turkey, no. 25774\/09, \u00a7 46, 21 July 2015", "external_sources": "Recommendation no. R (84) 20 of the Council of Europe concerning the control of infectious diseases", "conclusion": "Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;No violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2 - Positive obligations;Article 2-1 - Life) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Alena Pol\u00e1\u010dkov\u00e1;Andr\u00e1s Saj\u00f3;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Ganna Yudkivska;Georgios A. Serghides;Guido Raimondi;Helen Keller;Krzysztof Wojtyczek;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Luis L\u00f3pez Guerra;Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska;Neboj\u0161a Vu\u010dini\u0107;Nona Tsotsoria;Pauliine Koskelo;Paulo Pinto De Albuquerque;Robert Spano;Vincent A. De Gaetano;Yonko Grozev;Gabriele Kucsko-Stadlmayer;Ksenija Turkovi\u0107;Pere Pastor Vilanova", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1219JUD005608013" }, "183": { "webcast_id": "5608013_16112016", "hearing_date": "2016-11-16 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Lopes de Sousa Fernandes v. Portugal (no. 56080\/13)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "56080\/13", "case_id": "001-166676", "case_name": "CASE OF LOPES DE SOUSA FERNANDES v. PORTUGAL", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-166676", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2015-12-15 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 3, "court": "7", "issue": "\n", "represented_by": "", "respondent": "PRT", "articles": "2;2-1;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Arskaya v. Ukraine, no 45076\/05, \u00a7 89, 5 December 2013;Asiye Gen\u00e7 v. Turkey, no 24109\/07, \u00a7 82, 27 January 2015;Baji\u0107 v. Croatia, no 41108\/10, \u00a7 93, 13 November 2012;Byrzykowski v. Poland, no 11562\/05, 27 June 2006, \u00a7 104;Calvelli and Ciglio v. Italy [GC], no 32967\/96, ECHR 2002\u2011I;Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin C\u00e2mpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848\/08, \u00a7 96, ECHR 2014;Codarcea v. Romania, no 31675\/04, \u00a7 104, 2 June 2009;De Santis and Olanda v. Italy (dec.), no 35887\/11, \u00a7 45, 9 July 2013;Dodov v. Bulgaria, no 59548\/00, \u00a7 87-98, 17 January 2008;Erikson v. Italy (dec.), no 37900\/97, 26 October 1999;Glass v. the United Kingdom, no 61827\/00, \u00a7 87, ECHR 2004 II;Guerra and Others v. Italy, 19 February 1998, \u00a7 44, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-I;Hristozov and Others v. Bulgaria, nos. 47039\/11 and 358\/12, \u00a7 122, ECHR 2012 (extracts);Kaya v. Turkey, 19 February 1998, \u00a7\u00a7 74-78 and 86-92, Reports 1998 I;Kudra v. Croatia, no 13904\/07, \u00a7 120, 18 December 2012;L.C.B. v. the United Kingdom, 9 June 1998, \u00a7 36, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 III;Lazzarini and Ghiacci v. Italy (dec.), no 53749\/00, 7 November 2002;Mastromatteo v. Italy [GC], no 37703\/97, \u00a7\u00a7 89\u201190, ECHR 2002\u2011VIII;McKerr v. the United Kingdom, no 28883\/95, \u00a7\u00a7 116-161, ECHR 2001 III;Mehmet \u015eent\u00fcrk and Bekir \u015eent\u00fcrk v. Turkey, no 13423\/09, \u00a7 97, ECHR 2013;Micallef v. Malta [GC], no 17056\/06, \u00a7 49, ECHR 2009;N.B. v. Slovakia, no 29518\/10, \u00a7\u00a7 76 \u00e0 78, 12 June 2012;Nencheva and Others v. Bulgaria, no 48609\/06, \u00a7 88, 18 June 2013;Oyal v. Turkey, no 4864\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 74-76, 23 March 2010;Paul and Audrey Edwards v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no 46477\/99, 4 June 2001;Po\u010dkajevs v. Latvia (dec.), no. 76774\/01, 21 October 2004;Powell v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no 45305\/99, ECHR 2000-V;P\u016bp\u0113dis v. Latvia (dec.), no 53631\/00, 15 February 2001;R.M.D. v. Switzerland, 26 September 1997, \u00a7 54, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997\u2011VI;Ramsahai and Others v. the Netherlands [GC], no 52391\/99, \u00a7\u00a7 286-289 and 323-357, ECHR 2007-II;Scavuzzo-Hager and Others v. Switzerland, no 41773\/98, \u00a7\u00a7 53-69 and 80-86, 7 February 2006;\u0160ilih v. Slovenia [GC], no. 71463\/01, \u00a7 195, 9 April 2009;S\u00fcleyman Ege v. Turkey, no 45721\/09, \u00a7 59, 25 June 2013;Trocellier v. France (dec.), no 75725\/01, ECHR 2006\u2013XIV;V.C. v. Slovakia, no 18968\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 107 \u00e0 117, ECHR 2011 (extracts);Vo v. France [GC], no 53924\/00, \u00a7 90, ECHR 2004-VIII;Worm v. Austria (dec.), no 22714\/93, 27 November 1995", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2 - Positive obligations;Article 2-1 - Life) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Andr\u00e1s Saj\u00f3;Krzysztof Wojtyczek;Nona Tsotsoria;Paulo Pinto De Albuquerque;Vincent A. De Gaetano;Gabriele Kucsko-Stadlmayer", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1215JUD005608013" }, "184": { "webcast_id": "7811713_09112016", "hearing_date": "2016-11-09 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "F\u00e1bi\u00e1n v. Hungary (no. 78117\/13)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "78117\/13", "case_id": "001-176769", "case_name": "CASE OF F\u00c1BI\u00c1N v. HUNGARY", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-176769", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 14, "document_date": "2017-09-05 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Section 83\/C of the 1997 Pensions Act", "represented_by": "GR\u00c1D A.", "respondent": "HUN", "articles": "14;14+P1-1;35;35-1;P1-1;P1-1-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Abuyeva and Others v. Russia, no. 27065\/05, \u00a7 222, 2 December 2010;Aizpurua Ortiz and Others v. Spain, no. 42430\/05, \u00a7 48, 2 February 2010;Allan v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 48539\/99, 28 August 2001;Allesch and Others v. Austria, no. 18168\/91, Commission decision of 1 December 1993;Apostolakis v. Greece, no. 39574\/07, 22 October 2009;Banfield v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 6223\/04, ECHR 2005 XI;B\u00e9l\u00e1n\u00e9 Nagy v. Hungary [GC], no. 53080\/13, ECHR 2016;Biao v. Denmark [GC], no. 38590\/10, \u00a7 88, ECHR 2016;Ble\u010di\u0107 v. Croatia [GC], no. 59532\/00, ECHR 2006 III,;Buzadji v. the Republic of Moldova [GC], no. 23755\/07, \u00a7 70, ECHR 2016 (extracts);Carson and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 42184\/05, ECHR 2010;Clift v. the United Kingdom, no. 7205\/07, \u00a7 66, 13 July 2010;D.H. and Others v. the Czech Republic [GC], no. 57325\/00, \u00a7 177, ECHR 2007 IV;da Silva Carvalho Rico v. Portugal (dec.), no. 13341\/14, 1 September 2015;E.B. v. France [GC], no. 43546\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 47-48, 22 January 2008;Eweida and Others v. the United Kingdom, nos. 48420\/10 and 3 others, \u00a7 86, ECHR 2013 (extracts);Fabris v. France [GC], no. 16574\/08, \u00a7 56, ECHR 2013 (extracts);H\u00e4m\u00e4l\u00e4inen v. Finland [GC], no. 37359\/09, \u00a7 109, ECHR 2014;Heinisch v. Germany, no. 28274\/08, \u00a7 64, ECHR 2011 (extracts);\u0130zzettin Do\u011fan and Others v. Turkey [GC], no. 62649\/10, \u00a7 158, ECHR 2016;James and Others v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1986, Series A no. 98;Khamtokhu and Aksenchik v. Russia [GC], nos. 60367\/08 and 961\/11, ECHR 2017;Kjartan \u00c1smundsson v. Iceland, no. 60669\/00, ECHR 2004 IX;Konstantin Markin v. Russia [GC], no. 30078\/06, ECHR 2012 (extracts);Kurnaz and Others v. Turkey (dec.), no. 36672\/97, 7 December 2004;Laki\u0107evi\u0107 and Others v. Montenegro and Serbia, nos. 27458\/06 and 3 others, 13 December 2011;Lenz v. Germany (dec.), no. 40862\/98, ECHR 2001 X;Liebscher and Others v. Austria, no. 25170\/94, Commission decision of 12 April 1996;Matheis v. Germany (dec.), no. 73711\/01, 1 February 2005;Mauriello v. Italy (dec.), no. 14862\/07, \u00a7 39, 13 September 2016;Moskal v. Poland, no. 10373\/05, \u00a7 74, 15 September 2009;Panfile v. Romania (dec.), no. 13902\/11, \u00a7 3, 20 March 2012;Pellegrin v. France [GC], no. 28541\/95, \u00a7 67, ECHR 1999 VIII;Poulain v. France (dec.), no. 52273\/08, 8 February 2011;Sabri G\u00fcne\u015f v. Turkey [GC], no. 27396\/06, \u00a7 29, 29 June 2012;Sahin v. Germany [GC], no. 30943\/96, \u00a7 87, ECHR 2003 VIII;S\u00e2mbata Bihor Greco-Catholic Parish v. Romania (dec.), no. 48107\/99, 25 May 2004;Sargsyan v. Azerbaijan [GC], no. 40167\/06, \u00a7 217, ECHR 2015;Stec and Others v. the United Kingdom (dec.) [GC], nos. 65731\/01 and 65900\/01, ECHR 2005 X;Stefanetti and Others v. Italy, nos. 21838\/10 and 7 others, \u00a7\u00a7 59 60, 15 April 2014;Stummer v. Austria [GC], no. 37452\/02, \u00a7 88, ECHR 2011;Top\u010di\u0107-Rosenberg v. Croatia, no. 19391\/11, \u00a7 36, 14 November 2013;Torri and Others v. Italy (dec.), nos. 11838\/07 and 12302\/07, \u00a7 37, 24 January 2012;Valkov and Others v. Bulgaria, nos. 2033\/04 and 8 others, 25 October 2011;Vallianatos and Others v. Greece [GC], nos. 29381\/09 and 32684\/09, \u00a7 85, ECHR 2013 (extracts);Van der Mussele v. Belgium, 23 November 1983, \u00a7 46, Series A no. 70;Vilho Eskelinen and Others v. Finland [GC], no. 63235\/00, \u00a7 62, ECHR 2007 II;Weller v. Hungary, no. 44399\/05, \u00a7 27, 31 March 2009;X and Others v. Austria [GC], no. 19010\/07, \u00a7 98, ECHR 2013", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Remainder inadmissible;No violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Deprivation of property;Peaceful enjoyment of possessions;Possessions);No violation of Article 14+P1-1 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property;Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Andr\u00e1s Saj\u00f3;Andr\u00e9 Potocki;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Branko Lubarda;Carlo Ranzoni;Guido Raimondi;Kristina Pardalos;Krzysztof Wojtyczek;Luis L\u00f3pez Guerra;Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska;Nona Tsotsoria;Pauliine Koskelo;Paulo Pinto De Albuquerque;S\u00edofra O'Leary;St\u00e9phanie Mourou-Vikstr\u00f6m;Vincent A. De Gaetano;Yonko Grozev;Ksenija Turkovi\u0107", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0905JUD007811713" }, "185": { "webcast_id": "7811713_09112016", "hearing_date": "2016-11-09 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "F\u00e1bi\u00e1n v. Hungary (no. 78117\/13)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "78117\/13", "case_id": "001-159210", "case_name": "CASE OF F\u00c1BI\u00c1N v. HUNGARY", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-159210", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2015-12-15 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 3, "court": "7", "issue": "", "represented_by": "GRAD A.", "respondent": "HUN", "articles": "14;14+P1-1-1;41;P1-1;P1-1-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Carson and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 42184\/05, \u00a7 70, ECHR 2010;Gaygusuz v. Austria, 16 September 1996, \u00a7\u00a7 41-42, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 IV;Karlheinz Schmidt v. Germany, \u00a7 22, 18 July 1994, Series A no. 291-B", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Violation of Article 14+P1-1-1 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Possessions;Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property);Pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "FALSE", "judges": "Andr\u00e1s Saj\u00f3;Krzysztof Wojtyczek;Nona Tsotsoria;Paulo Pinto De Albuquerque;Vincent A. De Gaetano", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1215JUD007811713" }, "186": { "webcast_id": "7811713_09112016", "hearing_date": "2016-11-09 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "F\u00e1bi\u00e1n v. Hungary (no. 78117\/13)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "78117\/13", "case_id": "001-146442", "case_name": "F\u00c1BI\u00c1N v. HUNGARY", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-146442", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "GRAD A.", "respondent": "HUN", "articles": "14;P1-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Communicated", "separate_opinion": "", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "187": { "webcast_id": "3528911_19102016", "hearing_date": "2016-10-19 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Regner v. the Czech Republic (no. 35289\/11)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "35289\/11", "case_id": "001-177299", "case_name": "CASE OF REGNER v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-177299", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2017-09-19 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Section 133(3) of Law no. 412\/2005 on the protection of classified information and suitability for security clearance (z\u00e1kon o ochran\u011b utajovan\u00fdch informac\u00edch a o bezpe\u010dnostn\u00ed zp\u016fsobilosti) ; Civil Service Act (Law no. 234\/2014)\n\n", "represented_by": "TROJAN L.", "respondent": "CZE", "articles": "6;6-1;34;35;35+6-1;35-3-a", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Al-Adsani v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 35763\/97, \u00a7 48, ECHR 2001 XI;Al-Dulimi and Montana Management INC. v. Switzerland [GC], no 5809\/08, \u00a7 97, ECHR 2016;Ankarcrona v. Sweden (dec.), no 35178\/97, ECHR 2000 VI;Avoti\u0146\u0161 v. Latvia [GC], no 17502\/07, ECHR 2016;Baka v. Hungary [GC], no 20261\/12, \u00a7 101, ECHR 2016;Bayer v. Germany, no 8453\/04, \u00a7 38, 16 July 2009;Ble\u010di\u0107 v. Croatia [GC], no 59532\/00, \u00a7\u00a7 63-67, ECHR 2006-III;Boulois v. Luxembourg [GC], no 37575\/04, ECHR 2012;Camps v. France (dec.), no 42401\/98, 24 October 2000;Cudak v. Lithuania [GC], no 15869\/02, \u00a7 57, ECHR 2010-III;Devenney v. the United Kingdom, no 24265\/94, \u00a7 23, 19 March 2002;Dzhidzheva-Trendafilova v. Bulgaria (dec.), no 12628\/09, \u00a7 50, 9 October 2012;Ell\u00e8s and Others v. Switzerland, no 12573\/06, \u00a7 16, 16 December 2010;Fayed v. the United Kingdom, 21 September 1994, \u00a7 65, Series A no 294 B;Fitt v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 29777\/96, \u00a7\u00a7 45-46 with further references, ECHR 2000 II;Helmut Blum v. Austria, no 33060\/10, \u00a7 65, 5 April 2016;Houbal v. the Czech Republic, no 75375\/01, \u00a7 70, 14 June 2005;Juri\u010di\u0107 v. Croatia, no 58222\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 54-58, 26 July 2011;K\u00f6k v. Turkey, no 1855\/02, \u00a7 36, 19 October 2006;Masson and Van Zon v. the Netherlands, 28 September 1995, \u00a7\u00a7 49-51, Series A no 327 A;Mats Jacobsson v. Sweden, 28 June 1990, \u00a7 32, Series A no 180 A;Miessen v. Belgium, no 31517\/12, \u00a7 48, 18 October 2016;Miryana Petrova v. Bulgaria, no 57148\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 30-40, 21 July 2016;Nazsiz v. Turkey (dec.), no 22412\/05, 26 May 2009;Obermeier v. Austria, 28 June 1990, \u00a7 69, Series A no 179;Ohneberg v. Austria, no 10781\/08, \u00a7 24, 18 September 2012;Oluji\u0107 v. Croatia, no 22330\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 33-34, 5 February 2009;Paroisse gr\u00e9co-catholique de Lupeni and Others v. Romania [GC], no 76943\/11, \u00a7 71, ECHR 2016 (extracts);Pocius v. Lithuania, no 35601\/04, \u00a7\u00a7 38-46, 6 July 2010;Prince Hans-Adam II of Liechtenstein v. Germany [GC], no 42527\/98, \u00a7 44, ECHR 2001 VIII;Pudas v. Sweden, 27 October 1987, \u00a7 34, Series A noo 125 A;Roche v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 32555\/96, \u00a7\u00a7 119-120, ECHR 2005 X;Schatschaschwili v. Germany [GC], no 9154\/10, \u00a7 107, ECHR 2015;Smagilov v. Russia (dec.), no 24324\/05, \u00a7 54, 13 November 2014;Ternovskis v. Latvia, no 33637\/02, 29 April 2014;Tinnelly & Sons Ltd and Others and McElduff and Others v. the United Kingdom, 10 July 1998, \u00a7 72, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 IV;Tsanova-Gecheva v. Bulgaria, no 43800\/12, \u00a7\u00a7 84-85, 15 September 2015;U\u017eukauskas v. Lithuania, no 16965\/04, \u00a7\u00a7 34-39, 6 July 2010;Van Marle and Others v. the Netherlands, 26 June 1986, \u00a7 35 Series A no 101;Veeber v. Estonia (no 1), no 37571\/97, \u00a7 70, 7 November 2002;Vilho Eskelinen and Others v. Finland [GC], no 63235\/00, \u00a7 62, ECHR 2007-II;Vu\u010dkovi\u0107 and Others v. Serbia (preliminary objection) [GC], nos. 17153\/11 and Others, 25 March 2014;Wolff Metternich v. the Netherlands (dec.), no 45908\/99, 18 May 1999", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Preliminary objection dismissed (Article 34 - Victim);Preliminary objection dismissed (Article 35-3-a - Ratione materiae);No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Administrative proceedings;Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing;Adversarial trial;Equality of arms)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Alena Pol\u00e1\u010dkov\u00e1;Ale\u0161 Pejchal;Andr\u00e1s Saj\u00f3;Andr\u00e9 Potocki;Dean Spielmann;Egidijus K\u016bris;Erik M\u00f8se;Eva Brems;Ganna Yudkivska;Giovanni Bonello;Guido Raimondi;Helena J\u00e4derblom;Khanlar Hajiyev;Krzysztof Wojtyczek;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Luis L\u00f3pez Guerra;M\u0101rti\u0146\u0161 Mits;Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska;Robert Spano;Georges Ravarani;Pere Pastor Vilanova", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0919JUD003528911" }, "188": { "webcast_id": "3528911_19102016", "hearing_date": "2016-10-19 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Regner v. the Czech Republic (no. 35289\/11)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "35289\/11", "case_id": "001-159071", "case_name": "CASE OF REGNER v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-159071", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2015-11-26 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 3, "court": "23", "issue": "Sections 12 and 133 \u00a7 3 of Law no. 412\/2005", "represented_by": "TROJAN L.", "respondent": "CZE", "articles": "6;6-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Ankarcrona v. Sweden (dec.), no 35178\/97, ECHR 2000 VI;Boulois v. Luxembourg [GC], no 37575\/04, \u00a7\u00a7 91 and 94, ECHR 2012;Camps v. France (dec.), no 42401\/98, 23 November 1999;\u010cepek v. the Czech Republic, no 9815\/10, \u00a7 44, 5 September 2013;Ell\u00e8s and Others v. Switzerland, no 12573\/06, \u00a7 16, 16 December 2010;Fitt v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 29777\/96, ECHR 2000 II;Fodor v. Germany, no 25553\/02, 11 December 2006;G\u00fcner \u00c7orum v. Turkey, no 59739\/00, 31 October 2006;Kr\u010dm\u00e1\u0159 and Others v. the Czech Republic, no 35376\/97, 3 March 2000;Kress v. France [GC], no 39594\/98, ECHR 2001-VI;Masson and Van Zon v. the Netherlands, 28 September 1995, \u00a7 51, Series A no 327 A;Mats Jacobsson v. Sweden, 28 June 1990, \u00a7 32, Series A no 180 A;Nider\u00f6st-Huber v. Switzerland, 18 February 1997, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997 I;Nikolova and Vandova v. Bulgaria, no 20688\/04, \u00a7 91, 17 December 2013;Nikolova and Vandova Matyjek v. Poland, no 38184\/03, \u00a7 55, 24 April 2007;Obermeier v. Austria, 28 June 1990, \u00a7 69, Series A no 179;Prikyan and Angelova v. Bulgaria, no 44624\/98, \u00a7 40, 16 February 2006;Pudas v. Sweden, 27 October 1987, \u00a7 34, Series A no 125 A;Ternovskis v. Latvia, no 33637\/02, 29 April 2014;Tinnelly & Sons Ltd and Others and McElduff and Others v. the United Kingdom, 10 July 1998, \u00a7 78, Reports 1998 IV;Topal v. Turkey, no 3055\/04, \u00a7 14, 21 April 2009;U\u017eukauskas v. Lithuania, no 16965\/04, 6 July 2010;Vilho Eskelinen and Others v. Finland [GC], no 63235\/00, ECHR 2007 II", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Administrative proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing;Adversarial trial;Equality of arms)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Ale\u0161 Pejchal;Andr\u00e9 Potocki;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Ganna Yudkivska;Helena J\u00e4derblom;Vincent A. De Gaetano", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1126JUD003528911" }, "189": { "webcast_id": "5666509_12102016", "hearing_date": "2016-10-12 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "K\u00e1roly Nagy v. Hungary (no. 56665\/09)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "56665\/09", "case_id": "001-177070", "case_name": "CASE OF K\u00c1ROLY NAGY v. HUNGARY", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-177070", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2017-09-14 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Section 15 (2) of the 1990 Church Act ; Article 130 (1) f of the Code of Civil Procedure ; Sections 9 and 29 of Statute no. II of 1994 ; Sections 34, 35, 77 and 79 of Statute no. I of 2000", "represented_by": "CECH A.", "respondent": "HUN", "articles": "6;6-1;35;35-3-a", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Al-Dulimi and Montana Management Inc. v. Switzerland [GC], no. 5809\/08, \u00a7 97, 21 June 2016;Azinas v. Cyprus [GC], no. 56679\/00, \u00a7 38, ECHR 2004-III;Baka v. Hungary [GC], no. 20261\/12, \u00a7 100, 23 June 2016;B\u00e9l\u00e1n\u00e9 Nagy v. Hungary [GC], no. 53080\/13, \u00a7 43, ECHR 2016;Blokhin v. Russia [GC], no. 47152\/06, \u00a7 91, ECHR 2016;Bochan v. Ukraine (no. 2) [GC], no. 22251\/08, \u00a7 42, ECHR 2015;Boulois v. Luxembourg [GC], no. 37575\/04, \u00a7 91, ECHR 2012;Lupeni Greek Catholic Parish and Others v. Romania [GC], no. 76943\/11, 29 November 2016;Nejdet \u015eahin and Perihan \u015eahin v. Turkey [GC], no. 13279\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 49-50, 20 October 2011;Roche v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 32555\/96, \u00a7\u00a7 119-120, ECHR 2005 X;Stichting Mothers of Srebrenica and Others v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 65542\/12, \u00a7 120, ECHR 2013 (extracts);Z and Others v. the United Kingdom[GC], no. 29392\/95, \u00a7 89, ECHR 2001 V", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Inadmissible (Article 35-3-a - Ratione materiae)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Ale\u0161 Pejchal;Andr\u00e1s Saj\u00f3;Andr\u00e9 Potocki;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Carlo Ranzoni;Egidijus K\u016bris;Guido Raimondi;Helen Keller;Iulia Motoc;Jon Fridrik Kj\u00f8lbro;Julia Laffranque;Krzysztof Wojtyczek;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Luis L\u00f3pez Guerra;Marko Bo\u0161njak;Neboj\u0161a Vu\u010dini\u0107;Nona Tsotsoria;Paul Lemmens;Paulo Pinto De Albuquerque;S\u00edofra O'Leary;Vincent A. De Gaetano;Georges Ravarani", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0914JUD005666509" }, "190": { "webcast_id": "5666509_12102016", "hearing_date": "2016-10-12 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "K\u00e1roly Nagy v. Hungary (no. 56665\/09)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "56665\/09", "case_id": "001-158946", "case_name": "CASE OF K\u00c1ROLY NAGY v. HUNGARY", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-158946", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2015-12-01 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 3, "court": "5", "issue": "", "represented_by": "NAGY M.", "respondent": "HUN", "articles": "6;6-1;35", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Akdivar and Others v. Turkey, 16 September 1996, \u00a7\u00a7 65-66, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 IV;Albert and Le Compte v. Belgium, 10 February 1983, \u00a7 29, Series A no. 58;Anheuser-Busch Inc. v. Portugal [GC], no. 73049\/01, \u00a7 83, ECHR 2007 I;Ashingdane v. the United Kingdom, 28 May 1985, \u00a7 57, Series A no. 93;Athanassoglou and Others v. Switzerland [GC], no. 27644\/95, \u00a7 48, ECHR 2000 IV;Balakin v. Russia, no. 21788\/06, \u00a7 52, 4 July 2013;Baudler v. Germany (dec.), no. 38254\/04, 6 December 2011;Bellet v. France, 4 December 1995, \u00a7 36, Series A no. 333 B;Bochan v. Ukraine (no. 2) [GC], no. 22251\/08, \u00a7 42, ECHR 2015;Boulois v. Luxembourg [GC], no. 37575\/04, \u00a7\u00a7 90-91, ECHR 2012;Case \u201crelating to certain aspects of the laws on the use of languages in education in Belgium\u201d (merits), 23 July 1968, Series A no. 6, pp. 33-34, \u00a7 9;Delfi AS v. Estonia [GC], no. 64569\/09, \u00a7 127, ECHR 2015;Dietrich Reuter v. Germany (dec.), nos. 32741\/06 and 19568\/09, 17 January 2012;Fayed v. the United Kingdom, 21 September 1994, \u00a7 65, Series A no. 294 B;Gherghina v. Romania (dec.) [GC], no. 42219\/07, 9 July 2015;Golder v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1975, \u00a7 36, Series A no. 18;Jeunesse v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 12738\/10, \u00a7 110, 3 October 2014;Kafkaris v. Cyprus [GC], no. 21906\/04, \u00a7 159, ECHR 2008;K\u00f6nig v. Germany, 28 June 1978, \u00a7 88, Series A no. 27;Le Calvez v. France, 29 July 1998, \u00a7 56, Reports 1998 V;Le Compte, Van Leuven and De Meyere v. Belgium, 23 June 1981, Series A no. 43;Markovic and Others v. Italy [GC], no. 1398\/03, ECHR 2006 XIV;Masson and Van Zon v. the Netherlands, 28 September 1995, \u00a7 49, Series A no. 327-A;Micallef v. Malta [GC], no. 17056\/06, \u00a7 74, ECHR 2009;Mocanu and Others v. Romania [GC], nos. 10865\/09, 45886\/07 and 32431\/08, ECHR 2014 (extracts);M\u00fcller v. Germany (dec.), no. 12986\/04, 6 December 2011;Rekv\u00e9nyi v. Hungary [GC], no. 25390\/94, \u00a7\u00a7 67-68, ECHR 1999 III;Roche v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 32555\/96, ECHR 2005 X;Rohlena v. the Czech Republic [GC], no. 59552\/08, \u00a7 51, ECHR 2015;Roland Reuter v. Germany (dec.), no. 39775\/04, 6 December 2011;Sabeh El Leil v. France [GC], no. 34869\/05, \u00a7 47, 29 June 2011;Sierpi\u0144ski v. Poland, no. 38016\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 87 and 90, 3 November 2009;Sporrong and L\u00f6nnroth v. Sweden, 23 September 1982, \u00a7 81, Series A no. 52;Stanev v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 36760\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 229-230, ECHR 2012;Stichting Mothers of Srebrenica and Others v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 65542\/12, \u00a7 120, ECHR 2013 (extracts);Tinnelly & Sons Ltd and Others and McElduff and Others v. the United Kingdom, 10 July 1998, \u00a7 61, Reports 1998 IV;Vu\u010dkovi\u0107 and Others v. Serbia [GC], no. 17153\/11, \u00a7\u00a7 69-71, 25 March 2014;Yanakiev v. Bulgaria, no. 40476\/98, \u00a7 58, 10 August 2006", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Remainder inadmissible;No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Access to court)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Andr\u00e1s Saj\u00f3;Egidijus K\u016bris;Guido Raimondi;Helen Keller;Jon Fridrik Kj\u00f8lbro;Neboj\u0161a Vu\u010dini\u0107;Paul Lemmens", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1201JUD005666509" }, "191": { "webcast_id": "5666509_12102016", "hearing_date": "2016-10-12 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "K\u00e1roly Nagy v. Hungary (no. 56665\/09)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "56665\/09", "case_id": "001-141195", "case_name": "K\u00c1ROLY NAGY v. HUNGARY", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-141195", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "", "respondent": "HUN", "articles": "6;6-1;9;9-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "", "separate_opinion": "", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "192": { "webcast_id": "93113_14092016", "hearing_date": "2016-09-14 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Satakunnan Markkinap\u00f6rssi Oy and Satamedia Oy v. Finland (no. 931\/13)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "931\/13", "case_id": "001-175121", "case_name": "CASE OF SATAKUNNAN MARKKINAP\u00d6RSSI OY AND SATAMEDIA OY v. FINLAND", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-175121", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2017-06-27 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Sections 2(5), 32, 44(1) and 44(3) of the Personal Data Act (henkil\u00f6tietolaki, personsuppgiftslagen, Act no. 523\/1999) ; Act on the Public Disclosure and Confidentiality of Tax Information (laki verotustietojen julkisuudesta ja salassapidosta, lagen om offentlighet och sekretess i fr\u00e5ga om beskattningsuppgifter, Act no. 1346\/1999) ; Guidelines for Journalists (Journalistin ohjeet, Journalistreglerna) (Point 29 of 1992 version ; Point 30 in later versions)", "represented_by": "VAINIO P.", "respondent": "FIN", "articles": "6;6-1;8;8-1;10;10-1;10-2;34;35;35-1;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Alkaya v. Turkey, no. 42811\/06, \u00a7 35, 9 October 2012;Amann v. Switzerland [GC], no. 27798\/95, \u00a7 70, ECHR 2000 II;Animal Defenders International v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 48876\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 108 and 110, ECHR 2013 (extracts);Avoti\u0146\u0161 v. Latvia [GC], no. 17502\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 105 and 109, ECHR 2016;Axel Springer AG v. Germany [GC], no. 39954\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 90-95, 7 February 2012;B\u00e9dat v. Switzerland [GC], no. 56925\/08, \u00a7 48, ECHR 2016;Bj\u00f6rk Ei\u00f0sd\u00f3ttir v. Iceland, no. 46443\/09, \u00a7 67, 10 July 2012;Bosphorus Hava Yollar\u0131 Turizm ve Ticaret Anonim \u015eirketi v. Ireland [GC], no. 45036\/98, \u00a7 164, ECHR 2005 VI;Buzadji v. the Republic of Moldova [GC], no. 23755\/07, \u00a7 70, ECHR 2016 (extracts);Centro Europa 7 S.r.l. and Di Stefano v. Italy [GC], no. 38433\/09, \u00a7 141, ECHR 2012;Couderc and Hachette Filipacchi Associ\u00e9s v. France [GC], no. 40454\/07, ECHR 2015 (extracts);Delfi AS v. Estonia [GC], no. 64569\/09, ECHR 2015;Egeland and Hanseid v. Norway, no. 34438\/04, \u00a7\u00a7 62-63, 16 April 2009;Erla Hlynsd\u03ccttir v. Iceland, no. 43380\/10, \u00a7 64, 10 July 2012;Flinkkil\u00e4 and Others v. Finland, no. 25576\/04, 6 April 2010;Fressoz and Roire v. France [GC], no. 29183\/95, \u00a7 54, ECHR 1999-I;Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979\/96, \u00a7 43, ECHR 2000-VII;G.S.B. v. Switzerland, no. 28601\/11, \u00a7 69, 22 December 2015;Huhtam\u00e4ki v. Finland, no. 54468\/09, \u00a7 51, 6 March 2012;Jersild v. Denmark, 23 September 1994, \u00a7 31, Series A no. 298;Koua Poirrez v. France, no. 40892\/98, \u00a7 61, ECHR 2003 X;Krone Verlag GmbH & Co. KG v. Austria, no. 34315\/96, \u00a7 37, 26 February 2002;Kudrevi\u010dius and Others v. Lithuania [GC], no. 37553\/05, ECHR 2015;Lingens v. Austria, 8 July 1986, \u00a7 42, Series A no. 103;Lupeni Greek Catholic Parish and Others v. Romania [GC], no. 76943\/11, \u00a7 143, ECHR 2016 (extracts);M.N. and Others v. San Marino, no. 28005\/12, \u00a7\u00a7 52-53, 7 July 2015;Magyar Helsinki Bizotts\u00e1g v. Hungary [GC], no. 18030\/11, 8 November 2016, ECHR 2016;MGN Limited v. the United Kingdom, no. 39401\/04, \u00a7 143, 18 January 2011;News Verlags GmbH & Co.KG v. Austria, no. 31457\/96, \u00a7 54, ECHR 2000 I;Niemietz v. Germany, 16 December 1992, \u00a7 29, Series A no. 251 B;Observer and Guardian v. the United Kingdom, 26 November 1991, \u00a7\u00a7 66-71, Series A no. 216;P.G. and J.H. v. the United Kingdom, no. 44787\/98, ECHR 2001-IX;Pafitis and Others v. Greece, 26 February 1998, \u00a7 95, Reports 1998 I;Perin\u00e7ek v. Switzerland [GC], no. 27510\/08, \u00a7 198, ECHR 2015 (extracts);R.P. and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 38245\/08, \u00a7 47, 9 October 2012;Ristam\u00e4ki and Korvola v. Finland, no. 66456\/09, 29 October 2013;Rotaru v. Romania [GC], no. 28341\/95, \u00a7\u00a7 43-44, ECHR 2000 V;S. and Marper v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 30562\/04 and 30566\/04, \u00a7 66, ECHR 2008;Shabanov and Tren v. Russia, no. 5433\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 44-50, 14 December 2006;Smirnova v. Russia, nos. 46133\/99 and 48183\/99, \u00a7 95, ECHR 2003 IX (extracts);Stoll v. Switzerland [GC], no. 69698\/01, \u00a7 146, ECHR 2007-V;S\u00fcrek v. Turkey (no. 1) [GC], no. 26682\/95, \u00a7 61, ECHR 1999-IV;The Sunday Times v. the United Kingdom (no. 1), 26 April 1979, \u00a7 62, Series A no. 30;The Sunday Times v. the United Kingdom (no. 2), 26 November 1991, \u00a7\u00a7 52-56, Series A no. 217;T\u00f8nsbergs Blad A.S. and Haukom v. Norway, no. 510\/04, \u00a7 87, 1 March 2007;Uzun v. Germany, no. 35623\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 44-46, ECHR 2010 (extracts);Vereniging Weekblad Bluf! v. the Netherlands, 9 February 1995, \u00a7\u00a7 41-46, Series A no. 306-A;Verlagsgruppe News GmbH v. Austria (no. 2), no. 10520\/02, \u00a7 36, 14 December 2006;Von Hannover v. Germany, no. 59320\/00, ECHR 2004 VI;Von Hannover v. Germany (no. 2) [GC], nos. 40660\/08 and 60641\/08, ECHR 2012;Vukota-Boji\u0107 v. Switzerland, no. 61838\/10, \u00a7 52, 18 October 2016;Weber v. Switzerland, 22 May 1990, \u00a7\u00a7 48-52, Series A no. 177;Wingrove v. the United Kingdom, 25 November 1996, \u00a7 58, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 V", "external_sources": "Articles 2 and 9 of the Convention for the Protection of Individuals with regard to Automatic Processing of Personal Data (Council of Europe);Article 9 of Directive 95\/46\/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) (repealed by Regulation 2016\/79)", "conclusion": "Preliminary objection dismissed (Article 34 - Victim);Preliminary objection dismissed (Article 35-1 - Final domestic decision);No violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression-{General} (Article 10-1 - Freedom to impart information);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Administrative proceedings;Article 6-1 - Reasonable time);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Alena Pol\u00e1\u010dkov\u00e1;Ale\u0161 Pejchal;Andr\u00e1s Saj\u00f3;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Armen Harutyunyan;Carlo Ranzoni;Ganna Yudkivska;George Nicolaou;Guido Raimondi;Helen Keller;Jon Fridrik Kj\u00f8lbro;Kristina Pardalos;Krzysztof Wojtyczek;Lech Garlicki;Luis L\u00f3pez Guerra;Marko Bo\u0161njak;Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska;Nona Tsotsoria;P\u00e4ivi Hirvel\u00e4;Pauliine Koskelo;Paulo Pinto De Albuquerque;S\u00edofra O'Leary;Vincent A. De Gaetano;Yonko Grozev", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0627JUD000093113" }, "193": { "webcast_id": "93113_14092016", "hearing_date": "2016-09-14 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Satakunnan Markkinap\u00f6rssi Oy and Satamedia Oy v. Finland (no. 931\/13)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "931\/13", "case_id": "001-156272", "case_name": "CASE OF SATAKUNNAN MARKKINAPORSSI OY AND SATAMEDIA OY v. FINLAND", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-156272", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2015-07-21 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 3, "court": "7", "issue": "Personal Data Act ; Act on the Public Disclosure and Confidentiality of Tax Information", "represented_by": "VAINIO P.", "respondent": "FIN", "articles": "6;6-1;10;10-1;10-2;35;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Axel Springer AG v. Germany [GC], no. 39954\/08, 7 February 2012;Bladet Troms\u00f8 and Stensaas v. Norway [GC], no. 21980\/93, \u00a7 58, ECHR 1999-III;Burden v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 13378\/05, \u00a7 60, ECHR 2008;De Haes and Gijsels v. Belgium, 24 February 1997, \u00a7 37, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997 I;E.B. v. France [GC], no. 43546\/02, \u00a7 47, 22 January 2008, ECHR 2000-I;Barfod v. Denmark, 22 February 1989, \u00a7 28, Series A no. 149;Flinkkil\u00e4 and Others v. Finland, no. 25576\/04, \u00a7 81, 6 April 2010;Fressoz and Roire v. France [GC], no. 29183\/95, \u00a7 45, ECHR 1999-I;Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979\/96, ECHR 2000-VII;Janowski v. Poland [GC], no. 25716\/94, ECHR 1999-I;Jersild v. Denmark, 23 September 1994, Series A no. 298;Koua Poirrez v. France, no. 40892\/98, \u00a7 61, ECHR 2003 X;Lehideux and Isorni v. France, 23 September 1998, \u00a7 57, Reports 1998 VII;Lingens v. Austria, 8 July 1986, Series A no. 103;MGN Limited v. the United Kingdom, no. 39401\/04, \u00a7 142, 18 January 2011;News Verlags GmbH & Co.KG v. Austria, no. 31457\/96, \u00a7 52;Nilsen and Johnsen v. Norway [GC], no. 23118\/93, \u00a7 43, ECHR 1999-VIII;Pafitis and Others v. Greece, 26 February 1998, \u00a7 95, Reports 1998 I;Sunday Times v. the United Kingdom (no. 1), 26 April 1979, \u00a7 62, Series A no. 30;Vallianatos and Others v. Greece [GC], nos. 29381\/09 and 32684\/09, \u00a7 72, ECHR 2013;Von Hannover v. Germany (no. 2) [GC], nos. 40660\/08 and 60641\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 104-107, ECHR 2012;Von Hannover v. Germany, no. 59320\/00, \u00a7 68, ECHR 2004 VI", "external_sources": "Directive 95\/46\/EC", "conclusion": "Remainder inadmissible;No violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression -{General} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression;Freedom to impart information);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Administrative proceedings;Article 6-1 - Reasonable time);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "George Nicolaou;Guido Raimondi;Krzysztof Wojtyczek;Nona Tsotsoria;P\u00e4ivi Hirvel\u00e4;Yonko Grozev", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0721JUD000093113" }, "194": { "webcast_id": "93113_14092016", "hearing_date": "2016-09-14 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Satakunnan Markkinap\u00f6rssi Oy and Satamedia Oy v. Finland (no. 931\/13)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "931\/13", "case_id": "001-128170", "case_name": "SATAKUNNAN MARKKINAPORSSI OY AND SATAMEDIA OY v. FINLAND", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-128170", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "2013-10-16 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "VAINIO P.", "respondent": "FIN", "articles": "6;6-1;10;10-1;14", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "", "separate_opinion": "FALSE", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "195": { "webcast_id": "1722411_31082016", "hearing_date": "2016-08-31 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Med\u017elis Islamske zajednice Br\u010dko and Others v. Bosnia and Herzegovina (no. 17224\/11)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "17224\/11", "case_id": "001-175180", "case_name": "CASE OF MED\u017dLIS ISLAMSKE ZAJEDNICE BR\u010cKO AND OTHERS v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-175180", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2017-06-27 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Section 6 of the Defamation Act", "represented_by": "MULAHALILOVICH O.", "respondent": "BIH", "articles": "8;8-2;10;10-1;10-2", "strasbourg_caselaw": "A. v. Norway, no. 28070\/06, 9 April 2009;Albert-Engelmann-Gesellschaft mbH v. Austria, no. 46389\/99, \u00a7 30, 19 January 2006;Animal Defenders International v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 48876\/08, \u00a7 103, ECHR 2013 (extracts);Aurelian Oprea v. Romania, no. 12138\/08, \u00a7 59, 19 January 2016;Axel Springer AG v. Germany [GC], no. 39954\/08, \u00a7 83, 7 February 2012;B\u00e9dat v. Switzerland [GC], no. 56925\/08, \u00a7 48, ECHR 2016;Bergens Tidende and Others v. Norway, no. 26132\/95, \u00a7 57, ECHR 2000 IV;Bezymyannyy v. Russia, no. 10941\/03, \u00a7 41, 8 April 2010;Bj\u00f6rk Ei\u00f0sd\u00f3ttir v. Iceland, no. 46443\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 67-68, 10 July 2012;Bladet Troms\u00f8 and Stensaas v. Norway [GC], no. 21980\/93, \u00a7\u00a7 63-66, ECHR 1999 III;Bucur and Toma v. Romania, no. 40238\/02, \u00a7 93, 8 January 2013;Centro Europa 7 S.r.l. and Di Stefano v. Italy [GC], no. 38433\/09, \u00a7 140, ECHR 2012;Ceylan v. Turkey [GC], no. 23556\/94, \u00a7 37, ECHR 1999 IV;Chauvy and Others v. France, no. 64915\/01, \u00a7 78, ECHR 2004-VI;Couderc and Hachette Filipacchi Associ\u00e9s v. France [GC], no. 40454\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 90-93, ECHR 2015 (extracts);Delfi AS v. Estonia [GC], no. 64569\/09, \u00a7 121, ECHR 2015;Dorota Kania v. Poland (no. 2), no. 44436\/13, \u00a7 73, 4 October 2016;Erla Hlynsd\u03ccttir v. Iceland, no. 43380\/10, \u00a7 65, 10 July 2012;Fressoz and Roire v. France [GC], no. 29183\/95, \u00a7 54, ECHR 1999 I;Goodwin v. the United Kingdom, 27 March 1996, \u00a7 39, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 II;Guja v. Moldova [GC], no. 14277\/04, \u00a7 70, ECHR 2008;Heinisch v. Germany, no. 28274\/08, \u00a7 64, ECHR 2011 (extracts);Janowski v. Poland [GC], no. 25716\/94, ECHR 1999 I;K. and T. v. Finland [GC], no. 25702\/94, \u00a7\u00a7 140-41, ECHR 2001 VII;Kar\u00e1csony and Others v. Hungary [GC], no. 42461\/13, \u00a7 124, ECHR 2016 (extracts);Kazakov v. Russia, no. 1758\/02, \u00a7 28, 18 December 2008;Korbely v. Hungary [GC], no. 9174\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 72-73, ECHR 2008;Le\u0161n\u00edk v. Slovakia, no. 35640\/97, ECHR 2003 IV;Maestri v. Italy [GC], no. 39748\/98, \u00a7 30, ECHR 2004-I;Magyar Helsinki Bizotts\u00e1g v. Hungary [GC], no. 18030\/11, \u00a7 166, 8 November 2016;Morice v. France [GC], no. 29369\/10, \u00a7 131, ECHR 2015;Murray v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 10511\/10, \u00a7 88, ECHR 2016;Nikowitz and Verlagsgruppe News GmbH v. Austria, no. 5266\/03, \u00a7\u00a7 25-26, 22 February 2007;Nikula v. Finland, no. 31611\/96, \u00a7\u00a7 44 and 46, ECHR 2002 II;Pedersen and Baadsgaard v. Denmark [GC], no. 49017\/99, \u00a7 87, ECHR 2004 XI;Pentik\u00e4inen v. Finland [GC], no. 11882\/10, \u00a7 81, ECHR 2015;Perin\u00e7ek v. Switzerland [GC], no. 27510\/08, \u00a7 198, ECHR 2015 (extracts);Pfeifer v. Austria, no. 12556\/03, \u00a7\u00a7 47-48, 15 November 2007;Rotaru v. Romania [GC], no. 28341\/95, \u00a7 52, ECHR 2000-V;Sanchez Cardenas v. Norway, no. 12148\/03, \u00a7\u00a7 37-39, 4 October 2007;Sidabras and D\u017eiautas v. Lithuania, nos. 55480\/00 and 59330\/00, \u00a7 49, ECHR 2004 VIII;Siryk v. Ukraine, no. 6428\/07, \u00a7 42, 31 March 2011;Sofranschi v. Moldova, no. 34690\/05, \u00a7 29, 21 December 2010;Stankiewicz and Others v. Poland, no. 48723\/07, \u00a7 61, 14 October 2014;Steel and Morris v. the United Kingdom, no. 68416\/01, \u00a7 89, ECHR 2005 II;S\u00fcrek v. Turkey (no. 1) [GC], no. 26682\/95, \u00a7 64, ECHR 1999 IV;Tammer v. Estonia, no. 41205\/98, \u00a7 69, ECHR 2001 I;Thoma v. Luxembourg, no. 38432\/97, ECHR 2001 III;Thorgeir Thorgeirson v. Iceland, 25 June 1992, \u00a7 65, Series A no. 239;T\u00f8nsbergs Blad A.S. and Haukom v. Norway, no. 510\/04, 1 March 2007;Verdens Gang and Aase v. Norway (dec.), no. 45710\/99, ECHR 2001 X;Von Hannover v. Germany (no. 2) [GC], nos. 40660\/08 and 60641\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 104-113, ECHR 2012;Waite and Kennedy v. Germany [GC], no. 26083\/94, \u00a7 54, ECHR 1999 I;White v. Sweden, no. 42435\/02, \u00a7 25, 19 September 2006;Zakharov v. Russia, no. 14881\/03, 5 October 2006", "external_sources": "Code of Ethics and Conduct for NGOs, World Association of Non Governmental Organisations (WANGO), 2004", "conclusion": "No violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression-{General} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Andr\u00e1s Saj\u00f3;Andr\u00e9 Potocki;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Egidijus K\u016bris;George Nicolaou;Guido Raimondi;Iulia Motoc;Jon Fridrik Kj\u00f8lbro;Khanlar Hajiyev;Krzysztof Wojtyczek;Ledi Bianku;Luis L\u00f3pez Guerra;M\u0101rti\u0146\u0161 Mits;Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska;Neboj\u0161a Vu\u010dini\u0107;Nona Tsotsoria;P\u00e4ivi Hirvel\u00e4;Paul Mahoney;St\u00e9phanie Mourou-Vikstr\u00f6m;Vincent A. De Gaetano;Gabriele Kucsko-Stadlmayer", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0627JUD001722411" }, "196": { "webcast_id": "1722411_31082016", "hearing_date": "2016-08-31 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Med\u017elis Islamske zajednice Br\u010dko and Others v. Bosnia and Herzegovina (no. 17224\/11)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "17224\/11", "case_id": "001-157760", "case_name": "CASE OF MED\u017dLIS ISLAMSKE ZAJEDNICE BR\u010cKO AND OTHERS v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-157760", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2015-10-13 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 3, "court": "7", "issue": "Section 6 of the Defamation Act 2003", "represented_by": "MULAHALILOVIC O.", "respondent": "BIH", "articles": "10;10-1;10-2", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Busuioc v. Moldova, no. 61513\/00, \u00a7 88, 21 December 2004;De Haes and Gijsels v. Belgium, no. 19983\/92, \u00a7 47, 24 February 1997;Janowski v. Poland [GC], no. 25716\/94, \u00a7 33, ECHR 1999 I;Jerusalem v. Austria, no. 26958\/95, \u00a7 42, ECHR 2001 II;Kazakov v. Russia, no. 1758\/02, 18 December 2008;Le\u0161n\u00edk v. Slovakia, no. 35640\/97, \u00a7 53, ECHR 2003 IV;Mouvement ra\u00eblien suisse v. Switzerland [GC], no. 16354\/06, \u00a7 48, ECHR 2012 (extracts);Savitchi v. Moldova, no. 11039\/02, \u00a7 59, 11 October 2005;Siryk v. Ukraine, no. 6428\/07, \u00a7 42, 31 March 2011;Sofranschi v. Moldova, no. 34690\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 28-32, 21 December 2010;Zakharov v. Russia, no. 14881\/03, \u00a7 23, 5 October 2006", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "No violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression -{General} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "George Nicolaou;Guido Raimondi;Krzysztof Wojtyczek;Ledi Bianku;Nona Tsotsoria;P\u00e4ivi Hirvel\u00e4", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1013JUD001722411" }, "197": { "webcast_id": "1722411_31082016", "hearing_date": "2016-08-31 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Med\u017elis Islamske zajednice Br\u010dko and Others v. Bosnia and Herzegovina (no. 17224\/11)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "17224\/11", "case_id": "001-141569", "case_name": "MEDZLIS ISLAMSKE ZAJEDNICE BRCKO I DRUGI v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-141569", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "", "respondent": "BIH", "articles": "10;10-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "", "separate_opinion": "", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "198": { "webcast_id": "2198004_06072016", "hearing_date": "2016-07-06 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Simeonovi v. Bulgaria (no. 21980\/04)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "21980\/04", "case_id": "001-172963", "case_name": "CASE OF SIMEONOVI v. BULGARIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-172963", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2017-05-12 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "2009 Execution of Punishments and Pre-Trial Detention Act and its implementing regulations ", "represented_by": "MARGARITOVA-VUCHKOVA S.", "respondent": "BGR", "articles": "3;6;6+6-3-c;6-1;6-3-c;41;46;46-2", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Aleksandr Zaichenko v. Russia, no. 39660\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 41-43, 18 February 2010;Averill v. the United Kingdom, no. 36408\/97, ECHR 2000 VI;Azinas v. Cyprus [GC], no. 56679\/00, \u00a7 32, ECHR 2004 III;Brusco v. France, no. 1466\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 47-50, 14 October 2010;Dayanan v. Turkey, no. 7377\/03, 13 October 2009;Deweer v. Belgium, 27 February 1980, \u00a7\u00a7 42-46, Series A no. 35;Dvorski v. Croatia [GC], no. 25703\/11, ECHR 2015;Eckle v. Germany, 15 July 1982, \u00a7 73, Series A no. 51;G\u00e4fgen v. Germany [GC], no. 22978\/05, \u00a7 180, ECHR 2010;H\u00e5kansson and Sturesson v. Sweden, 21 February 1990, \u00a7 66, Series A no. 171-A;Harakchiev and Tolumov v. Bulgaria, nos. 15018\/11 and 61199\/12, \u00a7 280, ECHR 2014 (extracts).;Heaney and McGuinness v. Ireland, no. 34720\/97, \u00a7 42, ECHR 2000 XII;Ibrahim and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 50541\/08, 50571\/08, 50573\/08 and 40351\/09, ECHR 2016;Imbrioscia v. Switzerland, 24 November 1993, \u00a7 36, Series A no. 275;Ireland v. the United Kingdom, 18 January 1978, \u00a7 161 in fine, Series A no. 25;John Murray v. the United Kingdom, no. 18731\/91, 8 February 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 I;K. and T. v. Finland [GC], no. 25702\/94, \u00a7\u00a7 140 and 141, ECHR 2001 VII;Kuri\u0107 and Others v. Slovenia [GC], no. 26828\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 235 and 236, ECHR 2012 (extracts);McFarlane v. Ireland [GC], no. 31333\/06, \u00a7 143, 10 September 2010;Murray v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 10511\/10, \u00a7 86, ECHR 2016;Pedersen and Baadsgaard v. Denmark [GC], no. 49017\/99, \u00a7 44, ECHR 2004 XI;P\u00e9lissier and Sassi v. France [GC], no. 25444\/94, \u00a7 66, ECHR 1999 II;Pishchalnikov v. Russia, no. 7025\/04, 24 September 2009;Sakhnovskiy v. Russia [GC], no. 21272\/03, \u00a7 90, 2 November 2010;Salduz v. Turkey [GC], no. 36391\/02, ECHR 2008;Sejdovic v. Italy [GC], no. 56581\/00, \u00a7 86, ECHR 2006 II;Stafford v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 46295\/99, \u00a763, ECHR 2002-IV;Stanev v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 36760\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 254-55, ECHR 2012;Yankov and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 4570\/05, \u00a7 23, 23 September 2010", "external_sources": "Reports of the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (CPT) following its visits to Bulgaria in 1999 (Burgas Investigation Detention Facility), 2002 (Burgas prison), 2006, 2008, 2014 and 2015 (Sofia Prison);Statement from European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) on 26 March 2015 on Bulgaria", "conclusion": "Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Procedural aspect);No violation of Article 6+6-3-c - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing) (Article 6 - Right to a fair trial;Article 6-3-c - Defence through legal assistance);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Alena Pol\u00e1\u010dkov\u00e1;Andr\u00e1s Saj\u00f3;Andr\u00e9 Potocki;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Dmitry Dedov;George Nicolaou;Georgios A. Serghides;Guido Raimondi;Helena J\u00e4derblom;Jon Fridrik Kj\u00f8lbro;Krzysztof Wojtyczek;Ledi Bianku;Luis L\u00f3pez Guerra;Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska;Neboj\u0161a Vu\u010dini\u0107;P\u00e4ivi Hirvel\u00e4;Paul Lemmens;Paul Mahoney;Robert Spano;Yonko Grozev;Gabriele Kucsko-Stadlmayer;Ksenija Turkovi\u0107;Pere Pastor Vilanova", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0512JUD002198004" }, "199": { "webcast_id": "2198004_06072016", "hearing_date": "2016-07-06 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Simeonovi v. Bulgaria (no. 21980\/04)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "21980\/04", "case_id": "001-158243", "case_name": "CASE OF SIMEONOVI v. BULGARIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-158243", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2015-10-20 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "7", "issue": "", "represented_by": "MARGARITOVA-VUCHKOVA S.", "respondent": "BGR", "articles": "3;6;6+6;6-1;6-3-c", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);No violation of Article 6+6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6-3-c - Defence through legal assistance) (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Right to a fair trial;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)", "separate_opinion": "FALSE", "judges": "George Nicolaou;Guido Raimondi;Krzysztof Wojtyczek;Ledi Bianku;P\u00e4ivi Hirvel\u00e4;Paul Mahoney;Yonko Grozev", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1020JUD002198004" }, "200": { "webcast_id": "3323412_29062016", "hearing_date": "2016-06-29 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Al Nashiri v. Romania (no. 33234\/12)", "hearing_type": "Chamber hearing", "appno": "33234\/12", "case_id": "001-183685", "case_name": "CASE OF AL NASHIRI v. ROMANIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-183685", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2018-05-31 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 3, "court": "4", "issue": "", "represented_by": "GOLDSTON J.A. ; SKILBECK R. ; SINGH A. ; HOLLANDER N. ; HATNEANU D.O.", "respondent": "ROU", "articles": "1;2;2+P6-1;2-1;3;3+P6-1;5;5-1;6;6-1;8;8-1;8-2;13;13+3;35;35-1;35-3-a;41;46;46-1;46-2;P6-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Abuyeva and Others v. Russia, no. 27065\/05, 2 December 2010;Aksoy v. Turkey, 18 December 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-VI;Al Nashiri v. Poland, no. 28761\/11, 24 July 2014;Al-Saadoon and Mufdhi v. the United Kingdom, no. 61498\/08, ECHR 2010;Al-Skeini and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 55721\/07, \u00a7 167, ECHR 2011;Anguelova v. Bulgaria, no. 38361\/97, \u00a7\u00a7 161-162, ECHR 2002;Armani Da Silva v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 5878\/08, \u00a7 233, ECHR 2016;Aslakhanova and Others v. Russia, nos. 2944\/06, 8300\/07, 50184\/07, 332\/08 and 42509\/10, \u00a7 96, 18 December 2012;Aslakhanova and Others v. Russia, nos. 2944\/06 and 4 others, 18 December 2012;Assanidze v. Georgia [GC], no. 71503\/01, ECHR 2004-II;Assenov and Others v. Bulgaria, 28 October 1998, Reports 1998 VIII;Association \u201c21 December 1989\u201d and Others v. Romania, nos. 33810\/07 and 18817\/08, \u00a7 202, 24 May 2011;Babar Ahmad and Others v. the United Kingdom, nos. 24027\/07, 11949\/08, 36742\/08, 66911\/09 and 67354\/09, \u00a7 168, 10 April 2012;Bankovi\u0107 and Others v. Belgium and Others (dec.) [GC], no. 52207\/99, \u00a7\u00a7 59-61, ECHR 2001-XII;Benzer and Others v. Turkey, no. 23502\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 218 219, 12 November 2013;\u00c7ak\u0131c\u0131 v. Turkey [GC], no. 23657\/94, \u00a7 85, ECHR 1999-IV;Cestaro v. Italy, no. 6884\/11, \u00a7\u00a7 205-208, 7 April 201;Chahal v. the United Kingdom, 15 November 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-V;Creang\u0103 v. Romania [GC], no. 29226\/03, \u00a7 88, 23 February 2012;Cyprus v. Turkey [GC], no. 25781\/94, ECHR 2001 IV;El-Masri v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia [GC], no. 39630\/09, ECHR 2012;Gentilhomme and Others v. France, nos. 48205\/99, 48207\/99 and 48209\/99, \u00a7 20, 14 May 2002;Georgia v. Russia (I) [GC], no. 13255\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 93-94, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Hirsi Jamaa and Others v. Italy [GC], no. 27765\/09, \u00a7 209, ECHR 2012;Husayn (Abu Zubaydah) v. Poland, no. 7511\/13, 24 July 2014;Ila\u015fcu and Others v. Moldova and Russia [GC], no. 48787\/99, \u00a7\u00a7 300-304, ECHR 2004 VII;Imakayeva v. Russia, no. 7615\/02, ECHR 2006 XIII (extracts);Incal v. Turkey, 9 June 1998, \u00a7\u00a7 68 et seq. Reports 1998 IV;Ireland v. the United Kingdom, 18 January 1978, \u00a7 161, Series A no. 25;Jalloh v. Germany [GC], no. 54810\/00, \u00a7\u00a7 16-18, ECHR 2006 IX;Jeronovi\u010ds v. Latvia [GC], no. 44898\/10, \u00a7\u00a7 107 and 118, 5 July 2016;Kaboulov v. Ukraine, no. 41015\/04, 19 November 2009;Kadirova and Others v. Russia, no. 5432\/07, \u00a7 94, 27 March 2012;Kaya v. Turkey, 19 February 1998, \u00a7 106, Reports 1998 I;Kurt v Turkey, 25 May 1998, \u00a7\u00a7 123-124, Reports 1998 III;Loizidou v. Turkey (preliminary objections), 23 March 1995, \u00a7\u00a7 47 and 56 Series A no. 310;Mahmut Kaya v. Turkey, no. 22535\/93, ECHR 2000-III;Mamatkulov and Askarov v. Turkey [GC], nos. 46827\/99 and 46951\/99, \u00a7\u00a7 67 and 90, ECHR 2005 I;Mikheyev v. Russia, no. 77617\/01, judgment of 26 January 2006;Mocanu and Others v. Romania [GC], nos. 10865\/09 and 2 others, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Nachova and Others v. Bulgaria [GC], nos. 43577\/98 and 43579\/98, \u00a7 147, ECHR 2005 VII;Nasr and Ghali v. Italy, no. 44883\/09, 23 February 2016;\u00d6calan v. Turkey [GC], no. 46221\/99, ECHR 2005-IV;Othman (Abu Qatada) v. the United Kingdom, no. 8139\/09, ECHR 2012 (extracts);Pretty v. the United Kingdom, no. 2346\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 61 and 65, ECHR 2002-III;Quinn v. France, 22 March 1995, \u00a7 42, Series A no. 311;Saadi v. Italy [GC], no. 37201\/06, \u00a7 125, ECHR 2008;Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986\/93, \u00a7 100, ECHR 2000-VII;Sargsyan v. Azerbaijan [GC], no. 40167\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 149-150, ECHR 2015;Savriddin Dzhurayev v. Russia, no. 71386\/10, \u00a7\u00a7 138, 252-254 and 256, ECHR 2013 (extracts);Sejdovic v. Italy [GC], no. 56581\/00, \u00a7 84, ECHR 2006 II;Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803\/94, ECHR 1999 V;Soering v. the United Kingdom, 7 July 1989, Series A no. 161, \u00a7 91;S\u00f6ylemez v. Turkey, no. 46661\/99, \u00a7 122, 21 September 2006;Varnava and Others v. Turkey [GC], nos. 16064\/90, 16065\/90, 16066\/90, 16068\/90, 16069\/90, 16070\/90, 16071\/90, 16072\/90 and 16073\/90, \u00a7 184, ECHR 2009", "external_sources": "2007 International Committee of the Red Cross Report;Statement of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights on detention of Taliban and Al-Qaeda prisoners at the US Base in Guant\u00e1namo Bay, Cuba, 16 January 2002;Amnesty International, Memorandum to the US Government on the rights of people in US custody in Afghanistan and Guant\u00e1namo Bay, April 2002;Human Rights Watch, \u201cUnited States, Presumption of Guilt: Human Rights Abuses of Post-September 11 Detainees\u201d, Vol. 14, No. 4 (G), August 2002;International Helsinki Federation for Human Rights, \u201cAnti terrorism Measures, Security and Human Rights: Developments in Europe, Central Asia and North America in the Aftermath of September 11\u201d, Report, April 2003;Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe Resolution no. 1340 (2003) on rights of persons held in the custody of the United States in Afghanistan or Guant\u00e1namo Bay (PACE Resolution), 26 June 2003\n;Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe\u2019s inquiry \u2013 the Marty Inquiry (2006, 2007 and 2011 Marty Reports);US Department of Justice Office of Professional Responsibility Report: \u201cInvestigation into the Office of Legal Counsel\u2019s Memoranda Concerning Issues Relating to the Central Agency\u2019s Use of \u2018Enhanced Interrogation Techniques\u2019 on Suspected Terrorists\u201d (2009 DOJ Report);Resolution on the alleged use of European countries by the CIA for the transportation and illegal detention of prisoners (2006\/22009INI);Articles 26 and 27 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (23 May 1969);Statement of the International Rehabilitation Council for Torture (IRCT) of February 2003;UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention, Opinion No. 29\/2006, Mr Ibn al-Shaykh al-Libi and 25 other persons v. United States of America, UN Doc. A\/HRC\/4\/40\/Add.1 at 103 (2006);Human Rights Watch, \u201cUnited States: Reports of Torture of Al Qaeda Suspects\u201d, 26 December 2002;Amnesty International Report 2003 \u2013 United States of America, 28 May 2003;Amnesty International, \u201cUnlawful detention of six men from Bosnia-Herzegovina in Guant\u00e1namo Bay\u201d, 29 May 2003;Amnesty International, \u201cUnited States of America, The threat of a bad example: Undermining international standards as \u2018war on terror\u2019 detentions continue\u201d, 18 August 2003;Amnesty International, \u201cIncommunicado detention\/Fear of ill treatment\u201d, 20 August 2003;International Committee of the Red Cross, United States: ICRC President urges progress on detention-related issues, news release 04\/03, 16 January 2004;Human Rights Watch - Statement on US Secret Detention Facilities of 6 November 2005;Human Rights Watch \u2013 List of Ghost Prisoners Possibly in CIA Custody of 30 November 2005;2010 UN Joint Study (A\/HRC\/1342) of the Human Rights Council of United Nations Organisation released the \u201cJoint Study on Global Practices in Relation to Secret Detention in the Context of Countering Terrorism of the Special Rapporteur on the Promotion and protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms while Countering Terrorism\u201d of 19 February 2010;The Fava Inquiry \u2013 of the Temporary Committee on the alleged use of European countries by the CIA for the transportation and illegal detention of prisoners (TDIP) set up by the European Parliament on 18 January 2006;US authorities\u2019 Report prepared by John Helgerson, the CIA Inspector General, in 2004 (2004 CIA Report);European Parliament resolution on the alleged use of European countries by the CIA for the transportation and illegal detention of prisoners (2006\/22009INI) of 14 February 2007;CIA background paper on the CIA\u2019s combined interrogation techniques (2004 CIA Background Paper) of 30 December 2004;Preamble to Protocol No. 13 to the European convention of human rights;2014 US Senate Committee Report", "conclusion": "Preliminary objections joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;(Art. 35-1) Six-month period;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for family life;Respect for private life);Violation of Article 13+3 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 3 - Prohibition of torture;Inhuman treatment);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing;Impartial tribunal;Independent tribunal;Tribunal established by law);Violation of Article 2+P6-1 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Death penalty) (Article 1 of Protocol No. 6 - Abolition of the death penalty-{general});Violation of Article 3+P6-1 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Inhuman punishment;Inhuman treatment) (Article 1 of Protocol No. 6 - Abolition of the death penalty-{general});Respondent State to take individual measures (Article 46-1 - Parties to case;Article 46-2 - Individual measures);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "FALSE", "judges": "Ale\u0161 Pejchal;Florin Streteanu;Iulia Motoc;Kristina Pardalos;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska;Paul Mahoney;Robert Spano", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0531JUD003323412" }, "201": { "webcast_id": "3323412_29062016", "hearing_date": "2016-06-29 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Al Nashiri v. Romania (no. 33234\/12)", "hearing_type": "Chamber hearing", "appno": "33234\/12", "case_id": "001-155567", "case_name": "AL NASHIRI v. ROMANIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-155567", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "SKILBECK R.", "respondent": "ROU", "articles": "2;2-1;3;5;5-1;8;8-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Communicated", "separate_opinion": "", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "202": { "webcast_id": "3323412_29062016", "hearing_date": "2016-06-29 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Al Nashiri v. Romania (no. 33234\/12)", "hearing_type": "Chamber hearing", "appno": "33234\/12", "case_id": "001-113814", "case_name": "AL NASHIRI v. ROMANIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-113814", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "2012-09-18 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "GOLDSTON J.A. ; SKILBECK R. ; SINGH A. ; HOLLANDER N.", "respondent": "ROU", "articles": "2;3;5;5-1;6;8;8-1;10;13;P6-1;P6-2", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Communicated", "separate_opinion": "FALSE", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "203": { "webcast_id": "4645411_29062016", "hearing_date": "2016-06-29 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Abu Zubaydah v. Lithuania (no. 46454\/11)", "hearing_type": "Chamber hearing", "appno": "46454\/11", "case_id": "001-183687", "case_name": "CASE OF ABU ZUBAYDAH v. LITHUANIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-183687", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2018-05-31 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 3, "court": "4", "issue": "", "represented_by": "DUFFY H. ; MICKUM IV G.B. ; MARGULIES J.", "respondent": "LTU", "articles": "1;3;5;5-1;8;8-1;8-2;13;13+3;34;35;35-1;41;46;46-1;46-2", "strasbourg_caselaw": "A. v. the United Kingdom, 23 September 1998, \u00a7 22, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 VI;Abuyeva and Others v. Russia, no. 27065\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 240-241, 2 December 2010;Aksoy v. Turkey, 18 December 1996, Reports 1996-VI;Al Nashiri v. Poland, no. 28761\/11, 24 July 2014;Al-Adsani v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 35763\/97, \u00a7\u00a7 26-31, ECHR 2001 XI;Al-Saadoon and Mufdhi v. the United Kingdom, no. 61498\/08, ECHR 2010;Al-Skeini and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 55721\/07, ECHR 2011;Anguelova v. Bulgaria, no. 38361\/97, \u00a7\u00a7 161-162, ECHR 2002 IV;Armani Da Silva v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 5878\/08, \u00a7 233, ECHR 2016;Aslakhanova and Others v. Russia, nos. 2944\/06 and 4 others, 18 December 2012;Assanidze v. Georgia [GC], no. 71503\/01, ECHR 2004-II;Assenov and Others v. Bulgaria, 28 October 1998, Reports 1998 VIII;Association \u201c21 December 1989\u201d and Others v. Romania, nos. 33810\/07 and 18817\/08, 24 May 2011;Babar Ahmad and Others v. the United Kingdom, nos. 24027\/07 and 4 others, \u00a7 168, 10 April 2012;Bankovi\u0107 and Others v. Belgium and Others (dec.) [GC], no. 52207\/99, \u00a7\u00a7 59-61, ECHR 2001-XII;Benzer and Others v. Turkey, no. 23502\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 218-219, 12 November 2013;\u00c7ak\u0131c\u0131 v. Turkey [GC], no. 23657\/94, \u00a7 85, ECHR 1999-IV;Cestaro v. Italy, no. 6884\/11, \u00a7\u00a7 205-208, 7 April 2015;Chahal v. the United Kingdom, 15 November 1996, Reports 1996-V;Creang\u0103 v. Romania [GC], no. 29226\/03, \u00a7 88, 23 February 2012;Cyprus v. Turkey [GC], no. 25781\/94, ECHR 2001 I;Egmez v. Cyprus, no. 30873\/96, \u00a7 78, ECHR 2000-XII;El-Masri v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia [GC], no. 39630\/09, ECHR 2012;G\u00e4fgen v. Germany [GC], no. 22978\/05, \u00a7 91, ECHR 2010;Gentilhomme, Schaff-Benhadji and Zerouki v. France, nos. 48205\/99 and 2 others, \u00a7 20, 14 May 2002;Georgia v. Russia (I) [GC], no. 13255\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 93-94, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Hirsi Jamaa and Others v. Italy [GC], no. 27765\/09, \u00a7 209, ECHR 2012;Husayn (Abu Zubaydah) v. Poland, no. 7511\/13, 24 July 2014;Ila\u015fcu and Others v. Moldova and Russia [GC], no. 48787\/99, ECHR 2004-VII;\u0130lhan v. Turkey [GC], no. 22277\/93, \u00a7 85, ECHR 2000 VII;Imakayeva v. Russia, no. 7615\/02, ECHR 2006 XIII (extracts);Ireland v. the United Kingdom, 18 January 1978, Series A no. 25;Jalloh v. Germany [GC], no. 54810\/00, \u00a7\u00a7 16-18, ECHR 2006 IX;Jeronovi\u010ds v. Latvia [GC], no. 44898\/10, \u00a7\u00a7 107 and 118, 5 July 2016;Kadirova and Others v. Russia, no. 5432\/07, \u00a7 94, 27 March 2012;Kaya v. Turkey, 19 February 1998, \u00a7 106, Reports 1998 I;Krastanov v. Bulgaria, no. 50222\/99, \u00a7 53, 30 September 2004;Kud\u0142a v. Poland [GC], no. 30210\/96, \u00a7 92, ECHR 2000 XI;Kurt v. Turkey, 25 May 1998, \u00a7\u00a7 123-124, Reports 1998 III;Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772\/95, ECHR 2000 IV;Loizidou v. Turkey (preliminary objections), 23 March 1995, \u00a7\u00a7 47 and 56, Series A no. 310;Mahmut Kaya v. Turkey, no. 22535\/93, ECHR 2000 III;Mamatkulov and Askarov v. Turkey [GC], nos. 46827\/99 and 46951\/99, \u00a7\u00a7 67 and 90, ECHR 2005 I;Nachova and Others v. Bulgaria [GC], nos. 43577\/98 and 43579\/98, \u00a7 147, ECHR 2005 VII;Nasr and Ghali v. Italy, no. 44883\/09, 23 February 2016;\u00d6calan v. Turkey [GC], no. 46221\/99, \u00a7 179, ECHR 2005 IV;Othman (Abu Qatada) v. the United Kingdom, no. 8139\/09, ECHR 2012 (extracts);Quinn v. France, 22 March 1995, \u00a7 42, Series A no. 311;Saadi v. Italy [GC], no. 37201\/06, \u00a7 125, ECHR 2008;Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986\/93, \u00a7 100, ECHR 2000-VII;Sargsyan v. Azerbaijan [GC], no. 40167\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 149-150, ECHR 2015;Savriddin Dzhurayev v. Russia, no. 71386\/10, \u00a7\u00a7 138, 252-254 and 256, ECHR 2013 (extracts);Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803\/94, ECHR 1999 V;Shamayev and Others v. Georgia and Russia, no. 36378\/02, \u00a7 375, ECHR 2005 III;Soering v. the United Kingdom, 7 July 1989, Series A no. 161;Varnava and Others v. Turkey [GC], nos. 16064\/90 and 8 others, \u00a7 184, ECHR 2009;Z and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 29392\/95, \u00a7 73, ECHR 2001 V", "external_sources": "2007 International Committee of the Red Cross Report;Statement of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights on detention of Taliban and Al-Qaeda prisoners at the US Base in Guant\u00e1namo Bay, Cuba, 16 January 2002;Amnesty International, Memorandum to the US Government on the rights of people in US custody in Afghanistan and Guant\u00e1namo Bay, April 2002;Human Rights Watch, \u201cUnited States, Presumption of Guilt: Human Rights Abuses of Post-September 11 Detainees\u201d, Vol. 14, No. 4 (G), August 2002;International Helsinki Federation for Human Rights, \u201cAnti terrorism Measures, Security and Human Rights: Developments in Europe, Central Asia and North America in the Aftermath of September 11\u201d, Report, April 2003;Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe Resolution no. 1340 (2003) on rights of persons held in the custody of the United States in Afghanistan or Guant\u00e1namo Bay (PACE Resolution), 26 June 2003;Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe\u2019s inquiry \u2013 the Marty Inquiry (2006, 2007 and 2011 Marty Reports)\n;US Department of Justice Office of Professional Responsibility Report: \u201cInvestigation into the Office of Legal Counsel\u2019s Memoranda Concerning Issues Relating to the Central Agency\u2019s Use of \u2018Enhanced Interrogation Techniques\u2019 on Suspected Terrorists\u201d (2009 DOJ Report);Resolution on the alleged use of European countries by the CIA for the transportation and illegal detention of prisoners (2006\/22009INI);Statement of the International Rehabilitation Council for Torture (IRCT) of February 2003;UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention, Opinion No. 29\/2006, Mr Ibn al-Shaykh al-Libi and 25 other persons v. United States of America, UN Doc. A\/HRC\/4\/40\/Add.1 at 103 (2006);Human Rights Watch, \u201cUnited States: Reports of Torture of Al Qaeda Suspects\u201d, 26 December 2002;Amnesty International Report 2003 \u2013 United States of America, 28 May 2003;Amnesty International, \u201cUnlawful detention of six men from Bosnia-Herzegovina in Guant\u00e1namo Bay\u201d, 29 May 2003;Amnesty International, \u201cUnited States of America, The threat of a bad example: Undermining international standards as \u2018war on terror\u2019 detentions continue\u201d, 18 August 2003;Amnesty International, \u201cIncommunicado detention\/Fear of ill treatment\u201d, 20 August 2003;International Committee of the Red Cross, United States: ICRC President urges progress on detention-related issues, news release 04\/03, 16 January 2004;Human Rights Watch - Statement on US Secret Detention Facilities of 6 November 2005;Human Rights Watch \u2013 List of Ghost Prisoners Possibly in CIA Custody of 30 November 2005;2010 UN Joint Study (A\/HRC\/1342) of the Human Rights Council of United Nations Organisation released the \u201cJoint Study on Global Practices in Relation to Secret Detention in the Context of Countering Terrorism of the Special Rapporteur on the Promotion and protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms while Countering Terrorism\u201d of 19 February 2010;The Fava Inquiry \u2013 of the Temporary Committee on the alleged use of European countries by the CIA for the transportation and illegal detention of prisoners (\u201cTDIP\u201d) set up by the European Parliament on 18 January 2006;US authorities\u2019 report prepared by John Helgerson, the CIA Inspector General, in 2004 (2004 CIA Report);CIA background paper on the CIA\u2019s combined interrogation techniques (2004 CIA Background Paper) of 30 December 2004;2014 US Senate Committee Report", "conclusion": "Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Victim;Preliminary objections joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;(Art. 35-1) Six-month period;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for family life;Respect for private life);Violation of Article 13+3 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 3 - Inhuman treatment;Prohibition of torture);Respondent State to take individual measures (Article 46-1 - Parties to case;Article 46-2 - Individual measures);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "FALSE", "judges": "Ale\u0161 Pejchal;Egidijus K\u016bris;Kristina Pardalos;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska;Paul Mahoney;Robert Spano", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0531JUD004645411" }, "204": { "webcast_id": "4645411_29062016", "hearing_date": "2016-06-29 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Abu Zubaydah v. Lithuania (no. 46454\/11)", "hearing_type": "Chamber hearing", "appno": "46454\/11", "case_id": "001-115816", "case_name": "ABU ZUBAYDAH v. LITHUANIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-115816", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "2012-12-14 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "KOSTAS S. ; VANDOVA V. ; DUFFY H. ; MICKUM G.B. ; JACOBSEN A. ; MARGULIES J.", "respondent": "LTU", "articles": "3;5;5-1-b", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "", "separate_opinion": "FALSE", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "205": { "webcast_id": "1648312_22062016", "hearing_date": "2016-06-22 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Khlaifia and Others v. Italy (no. 16483\/12)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "16483\/12", "case_id": "001-170054", "case_name": "CASE OF KHLAIFIA AND OTHERS v. ITALY", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-170054", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2016-12-15 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Article 10 \u00a7 4 of Legislative Decree no. 286 of 1998 providing \u201cConsolidated text of provisions concerning immigration regulations and rules on the status of aliens\u201d ; Article 13 of the Italian Constitution\n", "represented_by": "MASERA L.M. ; ZIRULIA S.", "respondent": "ITA", "articles": "3;5;5-1;5-1-f;5-2;5-4;13;13+3;13+P4-4;41;P4-4", "strasbourg_caselaw": "A. and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 3455\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 162-163, ECHR 2009;A.A. v. Greece, no 12186\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 57-65, 22 July 2010;A.F. v. Greece, no 53709\/11, \u00a7\u00a7 71-80, 13 June 2013;Aarabi v. Greece, no 39766\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 42-51, 2 April 2015;Abdolkhani and Karimnia v. Turkey, no 30471\/08, 22 September 2009;Aksoy v. Turkey, 18 December 1996, \u00a7 61, Reports 1996 VI;Alver v. Estonia, no 64812\/01, \u00a7 50, 8 November 2005;Amuur v. France, 25 June 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-III;Ananyev and Others v. Russia, nos. 42525\/07 and 60800\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 142-145, 10 January 2012;Andrei Frolov v. Russia, no 205\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 47-49, 29 March 2007;Andric v. Sweden (dec.), no 45917\/99, 23 February 1999;B.M. v. Greece, no 53608\/11, \u00a7\u00a7 67-70, 19 December 2013;Babushkin v. Russia, no 67253\/01, \u00a7 44, 18 October 2007;Baranowski v. Poland, no 28358\/95, ECHR 2000-III;Belevitskiy v. Russia, no 72967\/01, \u00a7\u00a7 73-79, 1 March 2007;Berisha and Haljiti v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (dec.), no 18670\/03, 16 June 2005;Blokhin v. Russia [GC], no 47152\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 164-172, ECHR 2016;Bouyid v. Belgium [GC], no 23380\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 81-90, ECHR 2015;Brega v. Moldova, no 52100\/08, 20 April 2010;Bubullima v. Greece, no 41533\/08, \u00a7 27, 28 October 2010;C.D. and Others v. Greece, nos. 33441\/10, 33468\/10 and 33476\/10, \u00a7\u00a7 49-54, 19 December 2013;C\u0103\u015funeanu v. Romania, no 22018\/10, \u00a7 60-62, 16 April 2013;Chahal v. the United Kingdom, 15 November 1996, Reports 1996-V;Chama\u00efev and Others v. Georgia and Russia, no 36378\/02, ECHR 2005-III;\u010conka v. Belgium, no 51564\/99, ECHR 2002-I;D.L. v. Bulgaria, no 7472\/14, \u00a7\u00a7 6 and 69-71, 19 May 2016;Davydov v. Estonia (dec.), no 16387\/03, 31 May 2005;Dbouba v. Turkey, no 15916\/09, \u00a7 54, 13 July 2010;De Jong, Baljet and Van den Brink v. the Netherlands, 22 May 1984, \u00a7 60, Series A no 77;De Wilde, Ooms and Versyp v. Belgium, 18 June 1971, \u00a7\u00a7 67-70, Series A no 12;De Souza Ribeiro v. France [GC], no. 22689\/07, ECHR 2012;Del R\u00edo Prada v. Spain [GC], no 42750\/09, \u00a7 125, ECHR 2013;Delbec v. France, no 43125\/98, \u00a7 33, 18 June 2002;Denisenko and Bogdanchikov v. Russia, no 3811\/02, \u00a7 83, 12 February 2009;Dougoz v. Greece, n\u00ba 40907\/98, \u00a7 46, ECHR 2001-II;Dritsas v. Italy (dec.), no 2344\/02, 1 February 2011;E. v. Norway, 29 August 1990, Series A no 181-A;Efremidze v. Greece, no 33225\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 36-42, 21 June 2011;El-Masri v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia [GC], no 39630\/09, \u00a7 195, ECHR 2012;F.H. v. Greece, no. 78456\/11, 31 July 2014;Fox, Campbell and Hartley v. the United Kingdom, 30 August 1990, \u00a7 40, Series A no 182;Fuchser v. Switzerland, no 55894\/00, \u00a7 43, 13 July 2006;G\u00e4fgen v. Germany [GC], no 22978\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 87-92, ECHR 2010;Gavrilovici v. Moldova, no 25464\/05, 15 December 2009;Georgia v. Russia (I) [GC], no 13255\/07, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Ghulami v. France (dec.), no 45302\/05, 7 April 2009;Giulia Manzoni v. Italy, 1 July 1997, \u00a7 25, Reports 1997-IV;Guzzardi v. Italy, 6 November 1980, \u00a7\u00a7 92-93, Series A no 39;Ha.A. v. Greece, no 58387\/11, \u00a7\u00a7 26-31, 21 April 2016;Herczegfalvy v. Austria, 24 September 1992, \u00a7 63, Series A no 244;Hirsi Jamaa and Others v. Italy [GC], no 27765\/09, ECHR 2012;Hutchison Reid v. the United Kingdom, no 50272\/99, \u00a7 79, ECHR 2003-IV;Ireland v. the United Kingdom, 18 January 1978, Series A no 25;Istv\u00e1n G\u00e1bor Kov\u00e1cs v. Hungary, no 15707\/10, \u00a7 26, 17 January 2012;Jalloh v. Germany [GC], no 54810\/00, \u00a7 67, ECHR 2006-IX;Je\u010dius v. Lithuania, no 34578\/97, \u00a7 56, ECHR 2000-IX;Kadikis v. Latvia, no 62393\/00, \u00a7 55, 4 May 2006;Kalashnikov v. Russia, no 47095\/99, \u00a7 102, ECHR 2002-VI;Kanagaratnam and Others v. Belgium, no 15297\/09, \u00a7 80, 13 December 2011;Kantyrev v. Russia, no 37213\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 50-51, 21 June 2007;Karalevi\u010dius v. Lithuania, no 53254\/99, \u00a7 39, 7 April 2005;Kehayov v. Bulgaria, no 41035\/98, \u00a7 64, 18 January 2005;Khudoyorov v. Russia, no 6847\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 106-107, ECHR 2005-X (extracts);Koktysh v. Ukraine, no 43707\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 22 and 91-95, 10 December 2009;Kud\u0142a v. Poland [GC], no 30210\/96, ECHR 2000-XI;L.M. v. Slovenia, no 32863\/05, 12 June 2014;Labita v. Italy [GC], no 26772\/95, \u00a7 170, ECHR 2000-IV;Lavrentiadis v. Greece, no 29896\/13, \u00a7 45, 22 September 2015;Luberti v. Italy, 23 February 1984, \u00a7\u00a7 33-37, Series A no 75;M.A. v. Cyprus, no 41872\/10, ECHR 2013;M.S.S. v. Belgium and Greece [GC], no 30696\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 217-234, ECHR 2011;Mahdid and Haddar v. Austria (dec.), no 74762\/01, 8 December 2005;Medvedyev and Others v. France [GC], no 3394\/03, \u00a7 73, ECHR 2010;Mete and Others v. Turkey, no 294\/08, \u00a7 112, 4 October 2012;Mocanu and Others v. Romania [GC], nos. 10865\/09, 45886\/07 and 32431\/08, \u00a7 315, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Moisseiev v. Russia, no 62936\/00, \u00a7\u00a7 124-127, 9 October 2008;Mooren v. Germany [GC], no 11364\/03, \u00a7 76, 9 July 2009;Mouisel v. France, no 67263\/01, \u00a7 37, ECHR 2002-IX;Mubilanzila Mayeka and Kaniki Mitunga v. Belgium, no 13178\/03, \u00a7\u00a7 53-54, ECHR 2006-XI;Mursi\u010d v. Croatia [GC], no 7334\/13, 20 October 2016;Musaev v. Turkey, no 72754\/11, \u00a7 40, 21 October 2014;N.C. v. Italy [GC], no 24952\/94, \u00a7 44, ECHR 2002-X;Naumenko v. Ukraine, no 42023\/98, \u00a7 108, 10 February 2004;Nikolova v. Bulgaria [GC], no 31195\/96, \u00a7 69, ECHR 1999-II;Novoselov v. Russia, no 66460\/01, \u00a7\u00a7 32 and 40-43, 2 June 2005;Oleksandr Volkov v. Ukraine, no 21722\/11, \u00a7 219, ECHR 2013;Paladi v. Moldova [GC], no 39806\/05, \u00a7 74, 10 March 2009;Peers v. Greece, no 28524\/95, \u00a7\u00a7 68 and 74, ECHR 2001 III;Popov v. France, nos. 39472\/07 and 39474\/07, 19 January 2012;Price v. the United Kingdom, no 33394\/96, \u00a7 24, ECHR 2001-VII;R.U. v. Greece, no 2237\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 62-64, 7 June 2011;Rahimi v. Greece, no 8687\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 60-62, 5 April 2011;Ramirez Sanchez v. France [GC], no 59450\/00, \u00a7 117, ECHR 2006-IX;Riad and Idiab v. Belgium, nos. 29787\/03 and 29810\/03, \u00a7 100, 24 January 2008;Ribitsch v. Austria, 4 December 1995, \u00a7 34, Series A no 336;Rivas v. France, no 59584\/00, \u00a7 38, 1 April 2004;Ruiz Rivera v. Switzerland, no 8300\/06, \u00a7 47, 18 February 2014;S.D. v. Greece, no 53541\/07, 11 June 2009;Saadi v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 13229\/03, \u00a7 43, ECHR 2008;Salman v. Turkey [GC], no 21986\/93, \u00a7\u00a7 99-100, ECHR 2000-VII;Selmouni v. France [GC], no 25803\/94, ECHR 1999-V;Sharifi and Others v. Italy and Greece, no 16643\/09, \u00a7 188, 21 October 2014;Shtukaturov v. Russia, no 44009\/05, \u00a7 123, ECHR 2008;Stanev v. Bulgaria [GC], no 36760\/06, ECHR 2012;Steel and Others v. the United Kingdom, 23 September 1998, \u00a7 54, Reports 1998-VII;Sulejmanovic v. Italy, no 22635\/03, \u00a7 43, 16 July 2009;Sultani v. France, no 45223\/05, ECHR 2007 IV;Svinarenko and Slyadnev v. Russia [GC], nos. 32541\/08 and 43441\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 113-114, ECHR 2014 (extracts);T. and A. v. Turkey, no 47146\/11, 21 October 2014;Tabesh v. Greece, no 8256\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 38-44, 26 November 2009;Tarakhel v. Switzerland [GC], no 29217\/12, \u00a7\u00a7 93-122, ECHR 2014;Tomasi v. France, 27 August 1992, \u00a7 110, Series A no 241-A;Torreggiani and Others v. Italy, nos. 43517\/09, 46882\/09, 55400\/09, 57875\/09, 61535\/09, 35315\/10 and 37818\/10, \u00a7\u00a7 68-69, 8 January 2013;Turan \u00c7ak\u0131r v. Belgium, no 44256\/06, \u00a7 54, 10 March 2009;Tyrer v. the United Kingdom, 25 April 1978, \u00a7 32, Series A no 26;V. v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 24888\/94, \u00a7 71, ECHR 1999 IX;Vachev v. Bulgaria, no 42987\/98, \u00a7 71, ECHR 2004-VIII;Van der Leer v. the Netherlands, 21 February 1990, \u00a7\u00a7 27-28, Series A no 170-A;Vasyukov v. Russia, no 2974\/05, \u00a7 59, 5 April 2011;Velinov v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, no 16880\/08, \u00a7 49, 19 September 2013;Vlasov v. Russia, no 78146\/01, \u00a7 84, 12 June 2008;Weeks v. the United Kingdom, 2 March 1987, \u00a7 61, Series A no 114;Winterwerp v. the Netherlands, 24 October 1979, \u00a7 39, Series A no 33;Witold Litwa v. Poland, no 26629\/95, \u00a7 60, ECHR 2000-III;Z. and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 29392\/95, \u00a7 73, ECHR 2001-V", "external_sources": "Directive 2008\/115\/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 (the \u201cReturn Directive\u201d) \u201con common standards and procedures in Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals\u201d;Bilateral agreement of 5 April 2011 between Italy and Tunisia;Council of Europe\u2019s Parliamentary Assembly (PACE) report \u201con the large-scale arrival of irregular migrants, asylum-seekers and refugees on Europe\u2019s southern shores\u201d, published on 30 September 2011;\u201cDraft articles on the expulsion of aliens\u201d adopted by the International Law Commission at its sixty-sixth session (2014), and of which the United Nations General Assembly took note by its Resolution A\/RES\/69\/119 of 10 December 2014\n\n", "conclusion": "Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention;Article 5-1-f - Expulsion);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-2 - Information on reasons for arrest;Prompt information);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Review of lawfulness of detention);No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);No violation of Article 4 of Protocol No. 4 - Prohibition of collective expulsion of aliens-{general} (Article 4 of Protocol No. 4 - Prohibition of collective expulsion of aliens);Violation of Article 13+3 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment;Prohibition of torture);No violation of Article 13+P4-4 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 4 of Protocol No. 4 - Prohibition of collective expulsion of aliens-{general};Prohibition of collective expulsion of aliens);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Alena Pol\u00e1\u010dkov\u00e1;Andr\u00e1s Saj\u00f3;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Dmitry Dedov;Erik M\u00f8se;Georgios A. Serghides;Guido Raimondi;Helen Keller;Khanlar Hajiyev;Kristina Pardalos;Krzysztof Wojtyczek;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Luis L\u00f3pez Guerra;M\u0101rti\u0146\u0161 Mits;Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska;Neboj\u0161a Vu\u010dini\u0107;Paul Lemmens;Robert Spano;St\u00e9phanie Mourou-Vikstr\u00f6m;Gabriele Kucsko-Stadlmayer;Georges Ravarani;Pere Pastor Vilanova", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1215JUD001648312" }, "206": { "webcast_id": "1648312_22062016", "hearing_date": "2016-06-22 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Khlaifia and Others v. Italy (no. 16483\/12)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "16483\/12", "case_id": "001-157277", "case_name": "CASE OF KHLAIFIA AND OTHERS v. ITALY", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-157277", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2015-09-01 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 3, "court": "5", "issue": "Articles 10 \u00a7 2 (b) and 14 of Legislative Decree no. 286 of 1998", "represented_by": "MASERA L.M. ; ZIRULIA S.", "respondent": "ITA", "articles": "3;5;5-1;5-1-f;5-2;5-4;13;13+3;13+P4-4;35;41;P4-4", "strasbourg_caselaw": "A. and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 3455\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 162-163, ECHR 2009;Abdolkhani and Karimnia v. Turkey, no 30471\/08, 22 September 2009;Adam and Others v. Germany (dec.), no 290\/03, 1 September 2005;Allan v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no 48539\/99, 28 August 2001;Alver v. Estonia, no 64812\/01, \u00a7 50, 8 November 2005;Amuur v. France, 25 June 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-III;Andrei Frolov v. Russia, no 205\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 47-49, 29 March 2007;Athary v. Turkey, no 50372\/09, \u00a7 36, 11 December 2012;Babushkin v. Russia, no 67253\/01, \u00a7 44, 18 October 2007;Baranowski v. Poland, no 28358\/95, ECHR 2000-III;Belevitskiy v. Russia, no 72967\/01, \u00a7\u00a7 73-79, 1 March 2007;Chahal v. the United Kingdom, 15 November 1996, Reports 1996-V;\u010conka v. Belgium, no 51564\/99, \u00a7\u00a7 61-63, ECHR 2002-I;Dbouba v. Turkey, no 15916\/09, \u00a7 54, 13 July 2010;De Jong, Baljet and Van den Brink v. the Netherlands, 22 May 1984, \u00a7 60, Series A no 77;De Souza Ribeiro v. France [GC], no 22689\/07, \u00a7 82, ECHR 2012;Dhahbi v. Italy, no 17120\/09, \u00a7 24, 8 April 2014;Dougoz v. Greece, n\u00ba 40907\/98, \u00a7 46, ECHR 2001-II;E. v. Norway, 29 August 1990, \u00a7 50, Series A no 181-A;Fox, Campbell and Hartley v. the United Kingdom, 30 August 1990, \u00a7 40, Series A no 182;G.C. v. Italy, no 73869\/10, \u00a7 36, 22 April 2014;Giulia Manzoni v. Italy, 1 July 1997, \u00a7 25, Reports 1997-IV;Guzzardi v. Italy, 6 November 1980, \u00a7\u00a7 92-93, Series A no 39;Herczegfalvy v. Austria, 24 September 1992, \u00a7 63, Series A no 244;Hirsi Jamaa and Others v. Italy [GC], no 27765\/09, \u00a7 183, ECHR 2012;Hutchison Reid v. the United Kingdom, no 50272\/99, \u00a7 79, ECHR 2003-IV;Ireland v. the United Kingdom, 18 January 1978, Series A no 25;Istv\u00e1n G\u00e1bor Kov\u00e1cs v. Hungary, no 15707\/10, \u00a7 26, 17 January 2012;Je\u010dius v. Lithuania, no 34578\/97, \u00a7 56, ECHR 2000-IX;Kadikis v. Latvia, no 62393\/00, \u00a7 55, 4 May 2006;Kalashnikov v. Russia, no 47095\/99, \u00a7 102, ECHR 2002-VI;Kantyrev v. Russia, no 37213\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 50-51, 21 June 2007;Karalevi\u010dius v. Lithuania, no 53254\/99, \u00a7 39, 7 April 2005;Kehayov v. Bulgaria, no 41035\/98, \u00a7 64, 18 January 2005;Khudoyorov v. Russia, no 6847\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 106-107, ECHR 2005-X (extracts);Kud\u0142a v. Poland [GC], no 30210\/96, ECHR 2000-XI;L.M. v. Slovenia, no 32863\/05, \u00a7 121, 12 June 2014;Labita v. Italy [GC], no 26772\/95, \u00a7 121, ECHR 2000-IV;M.S. v. Belgium, no 50012\/08, \u00a7 122, 31 January 2012;M.S.S. v. Belgium and Greece [GC], no 30696\/09, \u00a7 388, ECHR 2011;Mahdid and Haddar v. Austria (dec.), no 74762\/01, 8 December 2005;Moghaddas v. Turkey, no 46134\/08, \u00a7 46, 15 February 2011;Moiseyev v. Russia, no 62936\/00, 9 October 2008;Mooren v. Germany [GC], no 11364\/03, \u00a7 76, 9 July 2009;Mouisel v. France, no 67263\/01, \u00a7 37, ECHR 2002-IX;Musaev v. Turkey, no 72754\/11, 21 October 2014;N.C. v. Italy [GC], no 24952\/94, \u00a7 44, ECHR 2002-X;Nasrulloyev v. Russia, no 656\/06, \u00a7 77, 11 October 2007;Naumenko v. Ukraine, no 42023\/98, \u00a7 108, 10 February 2004;Nikolova v. Bulgaria [GC], no 31195\/96, \u00a7 69, ECHR 1999-II;Novoselov v. Russia, no 66460\/01, \u00a7\u00a7 32 and 40-43, 2 June 2005;Peers v. Greece, no 28524\/95, \u00a7\u00a7 68 and 74, ECHR 2001-III;Price v. the United Kingdom, no 33394\/96, \u00a7 24, ECHR 2001-VII;Rahimi v. Greece, no 8687\/08, \u00a7 60, 5 April 2011;Raninen v. Finland, 16 December 1997, \u00a7 55, Reports 1997-VIII;Riad and Idiab v. Belgium, nos. 29787\/03 and 29810\/03, \u00a7 100, 24 January 2008;Ruiz Rivera v. Switzerland, no 8300\/06, \u00a7 47, 18 February 2014;S.D. v. Greece, no 53541\/07, \u00a7 76, 11 June 2009;Saadi v. Italy [GC], no 37201\/06, \u00a7 131, ECHR 2008;Saadi v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 13229\/03, \u00a7 43, ECHR 2008;Shamayev and Others v. Georgia and Russia, no 36378\/02, ECHR 2005 III;Shtukaturov v. Russia, no 44009\/05, \u00a7 123, ECHR 2008;Soering v. the United Kingdom, 7 July 1989, \u00a7 88, Series A no 161;Stanev v. Bulgaria [GC], no 36760\/06, ECHR 2012;Sulejmanovic v. Italy, no 22635\/03, \u00a7 43, 16 July 2009;Vachev v. Bulgaria, no 42987\/98, \u00a7 71, ECHR 2004-VIII;Van der Leer v. the Netherlands, 21 February 1990, \u00a7 28, Series A no 170-A;Velinov v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, no 16880\/08, \u00a7 49, 19 September 2013;Vlasov v. Russia, no 78146\/01, \u00a7 84, 12 June 2008;Weeks v. the United Kingdom, 2 March 1987, \u00a7 61, Series A no 114;Witold Litwa v. Poland, no 26629\/95, \u00a7 78, ECHR 2000-III", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention;Article 5-1-f - Expulsion);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-2 - Information on reasons for arrest;Prompt information);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Review of lawfulness of detention);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 4 of Protocol No. 4 - Prohibition of collective expulsion of aliens-{general} (Article 4 of Protocol No. 4 - Prohibition of collective expulsion of aliens);Violation of Article 13+3 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Prohibition of torture);Violation of Article 13+P4-4 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 4 of Protocol No. 4 - Prohibition of collective expulsion of aliens-{general};Prohibition of collective expulsion of aliens);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Andr\u00e1s Saj\u00f3;Guido Raimondi;Helen Keller;Neboj\u0161a Vu\u010dini\u0107;Paul Lemmens;Robert Spano", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0901JUD001648312" }, "207": { "webcast_id": "1986712_01062016", "hearing_date": "2016-06-01 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Moreira Ferreira v. Portugal (No. 2) (no. 19867\/12) ", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "19867\/12", "case_id": "001-175646", "case_name": "CASE OF MOREIRA FERREIRA v. PORTUGAL (No. 2)", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-175646", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2017-07-11 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Articles 449 (1) (g) and 457 of the Code of Criminal Procedure", "represented_by": "ALVES J.J.F.", "respondent": "PRT", "articles": "6;6-1;35;35-3-a;46;46-1;46-2", "strasbourg_caselaw": "An\u0111elkovi\u0107 v. Serbia, no. 1401\/08, \u00a7 24, 9 April 2013;Assanidze v. Georgia [GC], no. 71503\/01, \u00a7\u00a7 202 and 203, ECHR 2004 II;Bochan v. Ukraine (no 2) [GC], no 22251\/08, ECHR 2015;Bota v. Romania, no. 16382\/03, \u00a7\u00a7 33 and 34, 4 November 2008;Bujni\u0163a v. Moldova, no. 36492\/02, \u00a7 20, 16 January 2007;Davydov v. Russia, no. 18967\/07, \u00a7 29, 30 October 2014;Del R\u00edo Prada v. Spain [GC], no. 42750\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 138 and 139, ECHR 2013;Dulaurans v. France, no. 34553\/97, \u00a7\u00a7 33-34 and 38, 21 March 2000;Egmez v. Cyprus, (dec.), no. 12214\/07, 18 September 2012;Emre v. Switzerland (no. 2), no. 5056\/10, 11 October 2011;Fischer v. Austria (dec.), no. 27569\/02, ECHR 2003-VI;Garc\u00eda Ruiz v. Spain [GC], no. 30544\/96, \u00a7 26, ECHR 1999 I;Giuran v. Romania, no. 24360\/04, \u00a7 39, ECHR 2011 (extracts);Henryk Urban and Ryszard Urban v. Poland, no. 23614\/08, \u00a7 66, 30 November 2010;Higgins and Others v. France, 19 February 1998, \u00a7\u00a7 42-43, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 I;Jeronovi\u010ds v. Latvia [GC], no. 44898\/10, \u00a7 118, ECHR 2016;Khamidov v. Russia, no. 72118\/01, \u00a7 170, 15 November 2007;Lenskaya v. Russia, no. 28730\/03, \u00a7\u00a7 39 and 40, 29 January 2009;Lhermitte v. Belgium [GC], no. 34238\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 66 and 67, ECHR 2016;Lyons and Others v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 15227\/03, ECHR 2003-IX;Maresti v. Croatia, no. 55759\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 25 and 28, 25 June 2009;Meftah and Others v. France [GC], nos. 32911\/96, 35237\/97 and 34595\/97, \u00a7 40, ECHR 2002 VII;Monnell and Morris v. the United Kingdom, 2 March 1987, \u00a7 54, Series A no. 115;Nikitin v. Russia, no. 50178\/99, \u00a7\u00a7 55-57, ECHR 2004 VIII;\u00d6calan v. Turkey (dec.), no. 5980\/07, 6 July 2010;\u00d6calan v. Turkey, [GC], no. 46221\/99, \u00a7 210, ECHR 2005 IV;Paradiso and Campanelli v. Italy [GC], no. 25358\/12, \u00a7 210, ECHR 2017;Pavlovi\u0107 and Others v. Croatia, no. 13274\/11, \u00a7 49, 2 April 2015;Radchikov v. Russia, no. 65582\/01, \u00a7 48, 24 May 2007;Ruiz Torija v. Spain, 9 December 1994, \u00a7\u00a7 29-30, Series A no. 303 A;Savinskiy v. Ukraine, no. 6965\/02, \u00a7 25, 28 February 2006;Sejdovic v. Italy, [GC], no. 56581\/00, ECHR 2006 II;\u015etefan v. Romania, no. 28319\/03, \u00a7 18, 6 April 2010;Tsanova-Gecheva v. Bulgaria, no. 43800\/12, \u00a7 91, 15 September 2015;Verein gegen Tierfabriken Schweiz (VgT) v. Switzerland (no 2) ([GC], no 32772\/02, ECHR 2009;Yaremenko v. Ukraine (no. 2), no. 66338\/09, 30 April 2015", "external_sources": "Recommendation No. (2000) 2 of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on re-examination or reopening of certain cases at domestic level following judgments of the European Court of Human Rights", "conclusion": "Preliminary objection dismissed (Article 35-3-a - Ratione materiae);Remainder inadmissible (Article 35-3-a - Ratione materiae);No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Access to court;Criminal charge;Fair hearing)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Andr\u00e1s Saj\u00f3;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Egidijus K\u016bris;Guido Raimondi;Helen Keller;Jon Fridrik Kj\u00f8lbro;Krzysztof Wojtyczek;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Luis L\u00f3pez Guerra;Marko Bo\u0161njak;Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska;Nona Tsotsoria;Paul Mahoney;Paulo Pinto De Albuquerque;S\u00edofra O'Leary;Vincent A. De Gaetano", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0711JUD001986712" }, "208": { "webcast_id": "6012511_25052016", "hearing_date": "2016-05-25 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "V.M. and Others v. Belgium (no. 60125\/11)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "60125\/11", "case_id": "001-169047", "case_name": "CASE OF V.M. AND OTHERS v. BELGIUM", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-169047", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 19, "document_date": "2016-11-17 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 2, "court": "8", "issue": "", "represented_by": "NERAUDAU E.", "respondent": "BEL", "articles": "37;37-1;37-1-c", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Ali v. Switzerland, 5 August 1998, \u00a7 32, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 V;Diallo v. the Czech Republic, no. 20493\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 44-47, 23 June 2011;Ibrahim Hayd v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 30880\/10, \u00a7 10, 29 November 2011;K. and T. v. Finland [GC], no. 25702\/94, \u00a7 140, ECHR 2001 VII;Kadzoev v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 56437\/07, \u00a7 7, 1 October 2013;M.H. and Others v. Cyprus (dec.), no. 41744\/10, \u00a7 14, 14 January 2014;M.Is. v. Cyprus (dec.), no. 41805\/10, \u00a7 20, 10 February 2015;Ramzy v. the Netherlands (striking out), no. 25424\/05, \u00a7 64, 20 July 2010;Sharifi and Others v. Italy and Greece, no. 16643\/09, 21 October 2014", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Struck out of the list (Article 37-1 - Striking out applications;Article 37-1-c - Continued examination not justified)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Andr\u00e1s Saj\u00f3;Andr\u00e9 Potocki;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Carlo Ranzoni;Egidijus K\u016bris;Ganna Yudkivska;Guido Raimondi;Helen Keller;Helena J\u00e4derblom;Jon Fridrik Kj\u00f8lbro;Khanlar Hajiyev;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Luis L\u00f3pez Guerra;M\u0101rti\u0146\u0161 Mits;Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska;Neboj\u0161a Vu\u010dini\u0107;Paul Lemmens;Pauliine Koskelo;St\u00e9phanie Mourou-Vikstr\u00f6m;Yonko Grozev;Ksenija Turkovi\u0107", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1117JUD006012511" }, "209": { "webcast_id": "6012511_25052016", "hearing_date": "2016-05-25 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "V.M. and Others v. Belgium (no. 60125\/11)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "60125\/11", "case_id": "001-156243", "case_name": "CASE OF V.M. AND OTHERS v. BELGIUM", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-156243", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2015-07-07 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 3, "court": "5", "issue": "", "represented_by": "NERAUDAU E.", "respondent": "BEL", "articles": "2;2-1;3;13;13+3;35;35-1;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "A.C. and Others v. Spain, no 6528\/11, 22 April 2014;Budina v. Russia (dec.), no 45603\/05, 18 June 2009;\u00c7elik and \u0130mret v. Turkey, no 44093\/98, \u00a7 57, 26 October 2004;\u010conka v. Belgium, no 51564\/99, \u00a7\u00a7 81-83, ECHR 2002-I;D.P. and J.C. v. the United Kingdom, no 38719\/97, \u00a7 136, 10 October 2002;De Donder and De Clippel v. Belgium, no 8595\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 68-69, 6 December 2011;De Souza Ribeiro v. France [GC], no 22689\/07, \u00a7 83, ECHR 2012;El-Masri v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia [GC], no 39630\/09, \u00a7 202, ECHR 2012;F.H. v. Greece, no 78456\/11, \u00a7\u00a7 107-111, 31 July 2014;Gebremedhin [Gaberamadhien] v. France, no 25389\/05, ECHR 2007 V;Hirsi Jamaa and Others v. Italy [GC], no 27765\/09, ECHR 2012;I.M. v. France, no 9152\/09, 2 February 2012;Kanagaratnam v. Belgium, no 15297\/09, \u00a7 62, 13 December 2011;Keenan v. the United Kingdom, no 27229\/95, \u00a7\u00a7 89-90, ECHR 2001 III;Labita v. Italy [GC], no 26772\/95, \u00a7 119, ECHR 2000-IV;M.S.S. v. Belgium and Greece [GC], no 30696\/09, ECHR 2011;Muskhadzhiyeva and Others v. Belgium, no 41442\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 55 and 63, 19 January 2010;M\u00fcslim v. Turkey, no 53566\/99, \u00a7 85, 26 April 2005;Nencheva and Others v. Bulgaria, no 48609\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 105 and 108, 18 June 2013;Nuri Kurt v. Turkey, no 37038\/97, \u00a7 116, 29 November 2005;Popov v. France, nos. 39472\/07 and 39474\/07, \u00a7 91, 19 January 2012;R.U. v. Greece, no 2237\/08, \u00a7 77, 7 June 2011;S.H.H. v. the United Kingdom, no 60367\/10, \u00a7 90, 29 January 2013;Salah Sheekh v. the Netherlands, no 1948\/04, \u00a7 136, 11 January 2007;Sharifi and Others v. Italy and Greece, no 16643\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 138-139, 21 October 2014;Singh and Others v. Belgium, no 33210\/11, 2 October 2012;Soering v. the United Kingdom, 7 July 1989, \u00a7 90, Series A no 161;Sufi and Elmi v. the United Kingdom, nos. 8319\/07 and 11449\/07, \u00a7 283, 28 June 2011;Svinarenko and Slyadnev v. Russia [GC], nos. 32541\/08 and 43441\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 114-115, 17 July 2014;Tarakhel v. Switzerland [GC], no 29217\/12, ECHR 2014 (extracts);\u00dcner v. the Netherlands [GC], no 46410\/99, \u00a7 54, ECHR 2006 XII;Yoh-Ekale Mwanje v. Belgium, no 10486\/10, \u00a7 106, 20 December 2011", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Preliminary objection joined to merits (Article 35-1 - Exhaustion of domestic remedies);Preliminary objection dismissed (Article 35-1 - Exhaustion of domestic remedies);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);No violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Life) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 13+3 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 3 - Prohibition of torture;Degrading treatment);Pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Andr\u00e1s Saj\u00f3;Egidijus K\u016bris;Helen Keller;Jon Fridrik Kj\u00f8lbro;Neboj\u0161a Vu\u010dini\u0107;Paul Lemmens", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0707JUD006012511" }, "210": { "webcast_id": "6036708_20042016", "hearing_date": "2016-04-20 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Khamtokhu and Aksenchik v. Russia (nos. 60367\/08 and 961\/11)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "60367\/08", "case_id": "001-170663", "case_name": "CASE OF KHAMTOKHU AND AKSENCHIK v. RUSSIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-170663", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2017-01-24 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Articles 57 and 79 \u00a7 5 of the Criminal Code", "represented_by": "YERMOLAYEVA N. ; MARALYAN A. ; DAVIDYAN E. ; MOSKALENKO K.", "respondent": "RUS", "articles": "5;5-1;14;14+5", "strasbourg_caselaw": "A.L. (X.W.) v. Russia, no. 44095\/14, \u00a7\u00a7 63-66, 29 October 2015;A.P. v. the United Kingdom, no. 15397\/89, Commission decision of 8 January 1992 (striking-out);Abdulaziz, Cabales and Balkandali v. the United Kingdom, 28 May 1985, Series A no. 94;Al-Saadoon and Mufdhi v. the United Kingdom, no. 61498\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 115-18 and 140-43, ECHR 2010;Austin and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 39692\/09, 40713\/09 and 41008\/09, \u00a7 53, ECHR 2012;Biao v. Denmark [GC], no. 38590\/10, ECHR 2016;Carson and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 42184\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 61 and 70, ECHR 2010;Case \u201crelating to certain aspects of the laws on the use of languages in education in Belgium\u201d (merits), 23 July 1968, \u00a7 9, Series A no. 6;Clift v. the United Kingdom, no. 7205\/07, 13 July 2010;D.H. and Others v. the Czech Republic [GC], no. 57325\/00, \u00a7 177, ECHR 2007 IV;Del R\u00edo Prada v. Spain [GC], no. 42750\/09, \u00a7 127, ECHR 2013;Derman v. Turkey, no. 21789\/02, \u00a7 28, 31 May 2011;Dickson v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 44362\/04, \u00a7 81, ECHR 2007-V;E.B. v. France [GC], no. 43546\/02, \u00a7 48, 22 January 2008;Frett\u00e9 v. France, no. 36515\/97, \u00a7 40, ECHR 2002 I;Gerger v. Turkey [GC], no. 24919\/94, \u00a7 69, 8 July 1999;H\u00e4m\u00e4l\u00e4inen v. Finland [GC], no. 37359\/09, \u00a7 109, ECHR 2014;Kafkaris v. Cyprus [GC], no. 21906\/04, ECHR 2008;Kjeldsen, Busk Madsen and Pedersen v. Denmark, 7 December 1976, \u00a7 56, Series A no. 23;Klass and Others v. Germany, 6 September 1978, \u00a7 68, Series A no. 28;Konstantin Markin v. Russia [GC], no. 30078\/06, ECHR 2012 (extracts);Kress v. France [GC], no. 39594\/98, \u00a7 70, ECHR 2001 VI;Kud\u0142a v. Poland [GC], no. 30210\/96, \u00a7 152, ECHR 2000-XI;Maaouia v. France [GC], no. 39652\/98, \u00a7 36, ECHR 2000-X;Murray v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 10511\/10, ECHR 2016;Nelson v. the United Kingdom, no. 11077\/84, Commission decision of 13 October 1986;Nikolova and Velichkova v. Bulgaria, no. 7888\/03, \u00a7 61, 20 December 2007;Okkal\u0131 v. Turkey, no. 52067\/99, \u00a7 73, ECHR 2006 XII (extracts);Petrovic v. Austria, 27 March 1998, Reports 1998 II;Sawoniuk v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 63716\/00, ECHR 2001 VI;Schalk and Kopf v. Austria, no. 30141\/04, \u00a7 105, ECHR 2010;Schwizgebel v. Switzerland, no. 25762\/07, ECHR 2010 (extracts);Smith and Grady v. the United Kingdom, nos. 33985\/96 and 33986\/96, \u00a7 104, ECHR 1999 VI;Soering v. the United Kingdom, 7 July 1989, \u00a7\u00a7 102-104, Series A no. 161;Stafford v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 46295\/99, \u00a7\u00a7 55-83, ECHR 2002 IV;Stec and Others v. the United Kingdom (dec.) [GC], nos. 65731\/01 and 65900\/01, ECHR 2005-X;Svinarenko and Slyadnev v. Russia [GC], nos. 32541\/08 and 43441\/08, \u00a7 118, ECHR 2014 (extracts);T. v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 24724\/94, \u00a7 117, 16 December 1999;Tyrer v. the United Kingdom, 25 April 1978, \u00a7 31, Series A no. 26;\u00dcnal Tekeli v. Turkey, no. 29865\/96, \u00a7 54, ECHR 2004 X (extracts);V. v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 24888\/94, \u00a7 118, ECHR 1999 IX;Vallianatos and Others v. Greece [GC], nos. 29381\/09 and 32684\/09, ECHR 2013 (extracts);Vinter and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 66069\/09, 130\/10 and 3896\/10, ECHR 2013 (extracts);X and Others v. Austria [GC], no. 19010\/07, \u00a7 99, ECHR 2013", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "No violation of Article 14+5 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article 5 - Right to liberty and security;Article 5-1 - Deprivation of liberty);No violation of Article 14+5 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article 5 - Right to liberty and security;Article 5-1 - Deprivation of liberty)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Andr\u00e1s Saj\u00f3;Andr\u00e9 Potocki;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Branko Lubarda;Dmitry Dedov;Erik M\u00f8se;Guido Raimondi;Isabelle Berro-Lef\u00e8vre;Julia Laffranque;Khanlar Hajiyev;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Luis L\u00f3pez Guerra;M\u0101rti\u0146\u0161 Mits;Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska;Paulo Pinto De Albuquerque;St\u00e9phanie Mourou-Vikstr\u00f6m;Gabriele Kucsko-Stadlmayer;Ksenija Turkovi\u0107", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0124JUD006036708" }, "211": { "webcast_id": "6036708_20042016", "hearing_date": "2016-04-20 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Khamtokhu and Aksenchik v. Russia (nos. 60367\/08 and 961\/11)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "60367\/08", "case_id": "001-107036", "case_name": "KHAMTOKHU v. RUSSIA AND OTHER APPLICATIONS", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-107036", "type": "DECISIONS", "typedescription": 9, "document_date": "", "collection": "CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "4", "issue": "", "represented_by": "N\/A", "respondent": "RUS", "articles": "2;3;5;6;7;13;14;17", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Partly inadmissible", "separate_opinion": "", "judges": "Anatoly Kovler;Elisabeth Steiner;Erik M\u00f8se;Khanlar Hajiyev;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Peer Lorenzen", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0927DEC006036708" }, "212": { "webcast_id": "6036708_20042016", "hearing_date": "2016-04-20 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Khamtokhu and Aksenchik v. Russia (nos. 60367\/08 and 961\/11)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "60367\/08", "case_id": "001-144794", "case_name": "KHAMTOKHU AND AKSENCHIK v. RUSSIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-144794", "type": "DECISIONS", "typedescription": 8, "document_date": "", "collection": "CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG", "importance": 3, "court": "4", "issue": "Article 57 of the Russian Criminal Code", "represented_by": "MIKASYAN T.", "respondent": "RUS", "articles": "5;5-1;14;14+5;35", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Partly admissible;Partly inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria", "separate_opinion": "", "judges": "Dmitry Dedov;Erik M\u00f8se;Isabelle Berro-Lef\u00e8vre;Julia Laffranque;Khanlar Hajiyev;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Ksenija Turkovi\u0107", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0513DEC006036708" }, "213": { "webcast_id": "6036708_20042016", "hearing_date": "2016-04-20 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Khamtokhu and Aksenchik v. Russia (nos. 60367\/08 and 961\/11)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "961\/11", "case_id": "001-170663", "case_name": "CASE OF KHAMTOKHU AND AKSENCHIK v. RUSSIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-170663", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2017-01-24 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Articles 57 and 79 \u00a7 5 of the Criminal Code", "represented_by": "YERMOLAYEVA N. ; MARALYAN A. ; DAVIDYAN E. ; MOSKALENKO K.", "respondent": "RUS", "articles": "5;5-1;14;14+5", "strasbourg_caselaw": "A.L. (X.W.) v. Russia, no. 44095\/14, \u00a7\u00a7 63-66, 29 October 2015;A.P. v. the United Kingdom, no. 15397\/89, Commission decision of 8 January 1992 (striking-out);Abdulaziz, Cabales and Balkandali v. the United Kingdom, 28 May 1985, Series A no. 94;Al-Saadoon and Mufdhi v. the United Kingdom, no. 61498\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 115-18 and 140-43, ECHR 2010;Austin and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 39692\/09, 40713\/09 and 41008\/09, \u00a7 53, ECHR 2012;Biao v. Denmark [GC], no. 38590\/10, ECHR 2016;Carson and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 42184\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 61 and 70, ECHR 2010;Case \u201crelating to certain aspects of the laws on the use of languages in education in Belgium\u201d (merits), 23 July 1968, \u00a7 9, Series A no. 6;Clift v. the United Kingdom, no. 7205\/07, 13 July 2010;D.H. and Others v. the Czech Republic [GC], no. 57325\/00, \u00a7 177, ECHR 2007 IV;Del R\u00edo Prada v. Spain [GC], no. 42750\/09, \u00a7 127, ECHR 2013;Derman v. Turkey, no. 21789\/02, \u00a7 28, 31 May 2011;Dickson v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 44362\/04, \u00a7 81, ECHR 2007-V;E.B. v. France [GC], no. 43546\/02, \u00a7 48, 22 January 2008;Frett\u00e9 v. France, no. 36515\/97, \u00a7 40, ECHR 2002 I;Gerger v. Turkey [GC], no. 24919\/94, \u00a7 69, 8 July 1999;H\u00e4m\u00e4l\u00e4inen v. Finland [GC], no. 37359\/09, \u00a7 109, ECHR 2014;Kafkaris v. Cyprus [GC], no. 21906\/04, ECHR 2008;Kjeldsen, Busk Madsen and Pedersen v. Denmark, 7 December 1976, \u00a7 56, Series A no. 23;Klass and Others v. Germany, 6 September 1978, \u00a7 68, Series A no. 28;Konstantin Markin v. Russia [GC], no. 30078\/06, ECHR 2012 (extracts);Kress v. France [GC], no. 39594\/98, \u00a7 70, ECHR 2001 VI;Kud\u0142a v. Poland [GC], no. 30210\/96, \u00a7 152, ECHR 2000-XI;Maaouia v. France [GC], no. 39652\/98, \u00a7 36, ECHR 2000-X;Murray v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 10511\/10, ECHR 2016;Nelson v. the United Kingdom, no. 11077\/84, Commission decision of 13 October 1986;Nikolova and Velichkova v. Bulgaria, no. 7888\/03, \u00a7 61, 20 December 2007;Okkal\u0131 v. Turkey, no. 52067\/99, \u00a7 73, ECHR 2006 XII (extracts);Petrovic v. Austria, 27 March 1998, Reports 1998 II;Sawoniuk v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 63716\/00, ECHR 2001 VI;Schalk and Kopf v. Austria, no. 30141\/04, \u00a7 105, ECHR 2010;Schwizgebel v. Switzerland, no. 25762\/07, ECHR 2010 (extracts);Smith and Grady v. the United Kingdom, nos. 33985\/96 and 33986\/96, \u00a7 104, ECHR 1999 VI;Soering v. the United Kingdom, 7 July 1989, \u00a7\u00a7 102-104, Series A no. 161;Stafford v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 46295\/99, \u00a7\u00a7 55-83, ECHR 2002 IV;Stec and Others v. the United Kingdom (dec.) [GC], nos. 65731\/01 and 65900\/01, ECHR 2005-X;Svinarenko and Slyadnev v. Russia [GC], nos. 32541\/08 and 43441\/08, \u00a7 118, ECHR 2014 (extracts);T. v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 24724\/94, \u00a7 117, 16 December 1999;Tyrer v. the United Kingdom, 25 April 1978, \u00a7 31, Series A no. 26;\u00dcnal Tekeli v. Turkey, no. 29865\/96, \u00a7 54, ECHR 2004 X (extracts);V. v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 24888\/94, \u00a7 118, ECHR 1999 IX;Vallianatos and Others v. Greece [GC], nos. 29381\/09 and 32684\/09, ECHR 2013 (extracts);Vinter and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 66069\/09, 130\/10 and 3896\/10, ECHR 2013 (extracts);X and Others v. Austria [GC], no. 19010\/07, \u00a7 99, ECHR 2013", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "No violation of Article 14+5 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article 5 - Right to liberty and security;Article 5-1 - Deprivation of liberty);No violation of Article 14+5 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article 5 - Right to liberty and security;Article 5-1 - Deprivation of liberty)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Andr\u00e1s Saj\u00f3;Andr\u00e9 Potocki;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Branko Lubarda;Dmitry Dedov;Erik M\u00f8se;Guido Raimondi;Isabelle Berro-Lef\u00e8vre;Julia Laffranque;Khanlar Hajiyev;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Luis L\u00f3pez Guerra;M\u0101rti\u0146\u0161 Mits;Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska;Paulo Pinto De Albuquerque;St\u00e9phanie Mourou-Vikstr\u00f6m;Gabriele Kucsko-Stadlmayer;Ksenija Turkovi\u0107", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0124JUD006036708" }, "214": { "webcast_id": "6036708_20042016", "hearing_date": "2016-04-20 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Khamtokhu and Aksenchik v. Russia (nos. 60367\/08 and 961\/11)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "961\/11", "case_id": "001-144794", "case_name": "KHAMTOKHU AND AKSENCHIK v. RUSSIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-144794", "type": "DECISIONS", "typedescription": 8, "document_date": "", "collection": "CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG", "importance": 3, "court": "4", "issue": "Article 57 of the Russian Criminal Code", "represented_by": "MIKASYAN T.", "respondent": "RUS", "articles": "5;5-1;14;14+5;35", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Partly admissible;Partly inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria", "separate_opinion": "", "judges": "Dmitry Dedov;Erik M\u00f8se;Isabelle Berro-Lef\u00e8vre;Julia Laffranque;Khanlar Hajiyev;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Ksenija Turkovi\u0107", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0513DEC006036708" }, "215": { "webcast_id": "7694311_02032016", "hearing_date": "2016-03-02 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Lupeni Greek Catholic Parish and Others v. Romania (no. 76943\/11)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "76943\/11", "case_id": "001-169054", "case_name": "CASE OF LUPENI GREEK CATHOLIC PARISH AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-169054", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2016-11-29 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Article 3 of Legislative Decree no. 126\/1990 amended by Government Ordinance no. 64\/2004 and Law no. 182\/2005 ; Government Emergency Ordinance no. 94\/2000 on the restitution of buildings having belonged to religious denominations in Romania, as amended on 25 July 2005 and published in the Official Gazette on 1 September 2005 ; Legislative Decree no. 126\/1990 on certain measures concerning the Romanian Church United to Rome (the Greek Catholic Church) \n\n", "represented_by": "HATNEANU D.O. ; BORSANYI C.T.", "respondent": "ROU", "articles": "6;6-1;14;14+6-1;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Albu and Others v. Romania, nos. 34796\/09 and sixty three others applications, 10 May 2012;An\u0111elkovi\u0107 v. Serbia, no 1401\/08, \u00a7 24, 9 April 2013;Beian v. Romania (no 1), no 30658\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 38-39, ECHR 2007-V (extracts);Bellet v. France, 4 December 1995, \u00a7 36, Series A no 333 B;Biao v. Denmark [GC], no 38590\/10, \u00a7 88, 24 May 2016;Bochan v. Ukraine (no 2) [GC], no 22251\/08, ECHR 2015;Bogdan Vod\u0103 Greek-Catholic Parish v. Romania, no. 26270\/04, 41, 19 November 2013;Boulois v. Luxembourg [GC], no 37575\/04, \u00a7 90, ECHR 2012;Cobzaru v. Romania, no 48254\/99, \u00a7\u00a7 2 and 111, 26 July 2007;Comingersoll S.A. v. Portugal [GC], no 35382\/97, ECHR 2000 IV;Cordova v. Italy (no 1), no 40877\/98, \u00a7 54, ECHR 2003-I;Cudak v. Lithuania [GC], no 15869\/02, ECHR 2010;Dulaurans v. France, no 34553\/97, \u00a7\u00a7 33-34 and 38, 21 March 2000;E.B. v. France [GC], no 43546\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 47-48, 22 January 2008;F\u0103lie v. Romania, no 23257\/04, \u00a7\u00a7 22 and 24, 19 May 2015;Fayed v. the United Kingdom, 21 September 1994, \u00a7 65, Series A no 294-B;Ferreira Santos Pardal v. Portugal, no 30123\/10, \u00a7\u00a7 42-47, 30 July 2015;Garc\u00eda Ruiz v. Spain [GC], no 30544\/96, \u00a7 28, ECHR 1999 I;Golder v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1975, \u00a7\u00a7 28-36, Series A no 18;Guerra and Others v. Italy, 19 February 1998, \u00a7 44, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 I;Hayati \u00c7elebi and Others v. Turkey, no 582\/05, 9 February 2016;Khamidov v. Russia, no 72118\/01, \u00a7 170, 15 November 2007;Kuti\u0107 v. Croatia, no 48778\/99, \u00a7 25, ECHR 2002 II;Maria Atanasiu and Others v. Romania, nos. 30767\/05 and 33800\/06, \u00a7 73, 12 October 2010;Markovic and Others v. Italy [GC], no 1398\/03, \u00a7\u00a7 94-98, ECHR 2006 XIV;McElhinney v. Ireland [GC], no 31253\/96, \u00a7\u00a7 24-25, 21 November 2001;Metropolitan Church of Bessarabia and Others v. Moldova, no. 45701\/99, \u00a7 118, ECHR 2001 XII;Micallef v. Malta [GC], no 17056\/06, \u00a7 74, ECHR 2009;Nejdet \u015eahin and Perihan \u015eahin v. Turkey [GC], no 13279\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 49-58 and 61, 20 October 2011;Nilsen and Johnsen v. Norway [GC], no 23118\/93, \u00a7 62, ECHR 1999 VIII;Nunes Dias v. Portugal (dec.), nos. 2672\/03 and 69829\/01, ECHR 2003-IV;Perez v. France [GC], no 47287\/99, \u00a7 82, ECHR 2004 I;Prince Hans-Adam II of Liechtenstein v. Germany [GC], no 42527\/98, \u00a7 45, ECHR 2001 VIII;Pruni\u0219 Greek Catholic Parish v. Romania (dec.), no 38134\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 37 and 40, 8 April 2014;Roche v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 32555\/96, \u00a7\u00a7 116-119, ECHR 2005 X;S\u00e2mbata Bihor Greek Catholic Parish v. Romania, no 48107\/99, \u00a7\u00a7 66-75, 12 January 2010;\u0218erban Marinescu v. Romania, no 68842\/13, \u00a7 78-80, 15 December 2015;Sf\u00e2ntul Vasile Polon\u0103 Greek Catholic Parish v. Romania, no 65965\/01, 7 April 2009;Sise\u015fti Greek Catholic Parish v. Romania, no. 32419\/04, \u00a7 27, 3 November 2015;Stanev v. Bulgaria [GC], no 36760\/06, \u00a7 230, ECHR 2012;Stec and Others v. the United Kingdom (dec.) [GC], nos. 65731\/01 and 65900\/01, \u00a7\u00a7 39-40, ECHR 2005 X;S\u00fcrmeli v. Germany [GC], no 75529\/01, \u00a7 128, ECHR 2006 VII;Tinnelly & Sons Ltd and Others and McElduff and Others v. the United Kingdom, 10 July 1998, \u00a7\u00a7 73 and 74, Reports 1998 IV;Vallianatos and Others v. Greece [GC], nos. 29381\/09 and 32684\/09, \u00a7 72, ECHR 2013;Vassilios Athanasiou and Others v. Greece, no 50973\/08, \u00a7 26, 21 December 2010;Yvon v. France, no 44962\/98, \u00a7 44, ECHR 2003 V;Z and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 29392\/95, \u00a7\u00a7 91-98, ECHR 2001 V;Zelca and Others v. Romania (dec.), no 65161\/10, \u00a7 14, 6 September 2011;Zielinski and Pradal and Gonzalez and Others v. France [GC], nos. 24846\/94 and 34165\/96 to 34173\/96, \u00a7 59, ECHR 1999-VII", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Access to court);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Reasonable time);No violation of Article 14+6-1 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article 6 - Right to a fair trial;Article 6-1 - Access to court);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Alena Pol\u00e1\u010dkov\u00e1;Andr\u00e1s Saj\u00f3;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Branko Lubarda;Carlo Ranzoni;Egidijus K\u016bris;George Nicolaou;Guido Raimondi;Iulia Motoc;J\u00e1n \u0160ikuta;Johannes Silvis;Josep Casadevall;Kristina Pardalos;Luis L\u00f3pez Guerra;M\u0101rti\u0146\u0161 Mits;Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska;Pauliine Koskelo;Paulo Pinto De Albuquerque;Robert Spano;S\u00edofra O'Leary;St\u00e9phanie Mourou-Vikstr\u00f6m;Georges Ravarani", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1129JUD007694311" }, "216": { "webcast_id": "7694311_02032016", "hearing_date": "2016-03-02 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Lupeni Greek Catholic Parish and Others v. Romania (no. 76943\/11)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "76943\/11", "case_id": "001-154984", "case_name": "CASE OF LUPENI GREEK CATHOLIC PARISH AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-154984", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2015-05-19 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 3, "court": "6", "issue": "Article 3 of Legislative Decree no. 126\/1990 ; Government Order no. 64\/2004 of 13 August 2004 ; Law no. 182\/2005 ; Government Emergency Ordinance no. 94\/2000 of July 2005 (\u201cOrdinance no. 94\/2000\u201d) ; Article 480 of the Civil Code", "represented_by": "HATNEANU D.O. ; BORSANYI C.T. ", "respondent": "ROU", "articles": "6;6-1;9;9-1;14;14+6-1;35;35-3;41;P1-1;P1-1-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "\u0100damsons v. Latvia, no 3669\/03, \u00a7 118, 24 June 2008;Albu and Others v. Romania, no 34796\/09, 10 May 2012;Atanasovski v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, no 36815\/03, \u00a7 38, 14 January 2010;Beian v. Romania (no 1), no 30658\/05, ECHR 2007 XIII;Bellet v. France, 4 December 1995, \u00a7 34, Series A no 333 B;Brualla G\u00f3mez de la Torre v. Spain, 19 December 1997, \u00a7 31, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997 VIII;Burden v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 13378\/05 , \u00a7 58, ECHR 2008;Carson and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 42184\/05, \u00a7 64, ECHR 2010;Catholic Archdiocese of Alba Iulia v. Romania, no. 33003\/03, \u00a7\u00a7 82-88, 25 September 2012;Cobzaru v. Romania, no 48254\/99, \u00a7 111, 26 July 2007;D.H. and Others v. the Czech Republic [GC], no 57325\/00, \u00a7 175, ECHR 2007 IV;E.B. v. France [GC], no 43546\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 47-48, 22 January 2008;Edificaciones March Gallego S.A. v. Spain, 19 February 1998, \u00a7 33, Reports 1998-I;Frydlender v. France [GC], no 30979\/96, \u00a7 43, ECHR 2000 VII;Gratzinger and Gratzingerova v. the Czech Republic (dec.) [GC], no 39794\/98, \u00a7 69, ECHR 2002 VII;Greg\u00f3rio de Andrade v. Portugal, no 41537\/02, \u00a7 36, 14 November 2006;Griechische Kirchengemeinde Munchen and Bayern E.V. v. Germany (dec.), no 52336\/99, 18 September 2007;Hoogendijk v. the Netherlands (dec.), no 58641\/00, 6 January 2005;Iordan Iordanov and Others v. Bulgaria, no 23530\/02, 2 July 2009;Juma Mosque Congregation and Others v. Azerbaijan (dec.), no 15405\/04, \u00a758, 8 January 2013;Kopeck\u00fd v. Slovakia [GC], no 44912\/98, \u00a7 35, ECHR 2004 IX;Liep\u0101jnieks v. Latvia (dec.), no 37586\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 95-96, 2 November 2010;Magyar Kereszt\u00e9ny Mennonita Egyh\u00e1z and Others v. Hungary, nos. 70945\/11, 23611\/12, 26998\/12, 41150\/12, 41155\/12, 41463\/12, 41553\/12, 54977\/12 and 56581\/12, ECHR 2014;Malhous v. the Czech Republic (dec.) [GC], no 33071\/96, 13 December 2000;Metropolitan Church of Bessarabia and Others v. Moldova, no 45701\/99, \u00a7 114, ECHR 2001 XII;Nejdet \u015eahin and Perihan \u015eahin v. Turkey [GC], no 13279\/05, 20 October 2011;Nilsen and Johnsen v. Norway [GC], no 23118\/93, \u00a7 62, ECHR 1999 VIII;Ouzounis and Others v. Greece, no 49144\/99, \u00a7 24, 18 April 2002;Potocka and Others v. Poland, no 33776\/96, \u00a7\u00a7 56-59, ECHR 2001 X;Pressos Compania Naviera S.A. and Others v. Belgium, 20 November 1995, Series A no 332;Ravon and Others v. France, no 18497\/03, \u00a7 27, 21 February 2008;S\u00e2mbata Bihor Greco-Catholic Parish v. Romania, no. 48107\/99, 12 January 2010;Santos Pinto v. Portugal, no 39005\/04, \u00a7 41, 20 May 2008;Schwarzkopf and Taussik v. the Czech Republic (dec.), no 42162\/02, 2 December 2008;Sindicatul \u00ab P\u0103storul cel Bun \u00bb v. Romania [GC], no 2330\/09, \u00a7 165, ECHR 2013 (extracts);Stagno v. Belgium, no 1062\/07, \u00a7 25, 7 July 2009;Stanev v. Bulgaria [GC], no 36760\/06, \u00a7 230, ECHR 2012;Stec and Others v. the United Kingdom (dec.) [GC], nos. 65731\/01 and 65900\/01, \u00a7 39, ECHR 2005 X;Stec and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 65731\/01, \u00a7 51, ECHR 2006 VI;Terra Woningen B.V. v. the Netherlands, 17 December 1996, \u00a7 52, Reports 1996 VI;Thlimmenos v. Greece [GC], no 34369\/97, \u00a7 44, ECHR 2000-IV;Tserkva Sela Sosulivka v. Ukraine, no 37878\/02, \u00a7 51, 28 February 2008;Un\u00e9dic v. France, no 20153\/04, \u00a7 73, 18 December 2008;Usnul v. the Czech Republic, no 33945\/06, 29 March 2011;Zarb Adami v. Malta, no 17209\/02, \u00a7 76, ECHR 2006 VIII", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Remainder inadmissible (Article 35-3 - Manifestly ill-founded;Ratione materiae);No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Access to court);No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Reasonable time);No violation of Article 14+6-1 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article 6 - Right to a fair trial;Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Access to court);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "FALSE", "judges": "Branko Lubarda;J\u00e1n \u0160ikuta;Johannes Silvis;Josep Casadevall;Kristina Pardalos;Luis L\u00f3pez Guerra", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0519JUD007694311" }, "217": { "webcast_id": "5916612_24022016", "hearing_date": "2016-02-24 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "J.K. and Others v. Sweden (no. 59166\/12)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "59166\/12", "case_id": "001-165442", "case_name": "CASE OF J.K. AND OTHERS v. SWEDEN", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-165442", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2016-08-23 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "", "represented_by": "SKYFACOS C.", "respondent": "SWE", "articles": "3;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Bahaddar v. the Netherlands, 19 February 1998, \u00a7 45, Reports 1998 I;Chahal v. the United Kingdom, 15 November 1996, \u00a7 98, Reports 1996-V;Collins and Akaziebie v. Sweden (dec.), no. 23944\/05, 8 March 2007;D.N.W. v. Sweden, no. 29946\/10, \u00a7\u00a7 42 and 45, 6 December 2012;F.G. v. Sweden [GC], no. 43611\/11, ECHR 2016;F.H. v. Sweden, no. 32621\/06, \u00a7 102, 20 January 2009;H.L.R. v. France, 29 April 1997, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997 III;Hilal v. the United Kingdom, no. 45276\/99, ECHR 2001-II;Hirsi Jamaa and Others v. Italy [GC], no. 27765\/09, \u00a7 116, ECHR 2012;Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772\/95, \u00a7 119, ECHR 2000 IV;M.A. v. Cyprus, no. 41872\/10, \u00a7 133, ECHR 2013 (extracts);M.S.S. v. Belgium and Greece [GC], no. 30696\/09, \u00a7 286, ECHR 2011;M\u00fcslim v. Turkey, no. 53566\/99, \u00a7\u00a7 72-76, 26 April 2005;N. v. Finland, no. 38885\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 154-155, 26 July 2005;NA. v. the United Kingdom, no. 25904\/07, 17 July 2008;Nizamov and Others v. Russia, nos. 22636\/13, 24034\/13, 24334\/13 and 24528\/13, \u00a7 50, 7 May 2014;R.C. v. Sweden, no. 41827\/07, \u00a7 55, 9 March 2010;R.J. v. France, no. 10466\/11, \u00a7 42, 19 September 2013;S.H. v. the United Kingdom, no. 19956\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 69-71, 15 June 2010;S.H.H. v. the United Kingdom, no. 60367\/10, \u00a7 71, 29 January 2013;Saadi v. Italy [GC] no. 37201\/06, ECHR 2008;Said v. the Netherlands, no. 2345\/02, \u00a7 49, ECHR 2005 VI;Salah Sheekh v. the Netherlands, no. 1948\/04, 11 January 2007;Sufi and Elmi v. the United Kingdom, nos. 8319\/07 and 11449\/07, 28 June 2011;T.I. v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 43844\/98, ECHR 2000-III;Venkadajalasarma v. the Netherlands, no. 58510\/00, \u00a7 63, 17 February 2004", "external_sources": "EU Council Directive 2004\/83\/EC of 29 April 2004 on minimum standards for the qualification and status of third country nationals or stateless persons as refugees or as persons who otherwise need international protection and the content of the protection granted (as recast by Directive 2011\/95\/EU of 13 December 2011);UNHCR Note on Burden and Standard of Proof in Refugee Claims;UNHCR Handbook and Guidelines on Procedures and Criteria for Determining Refugee Status", "conclusion": "Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Expulsion) (Conditional) (Iraq);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Alena Pol\u00e1\u010dkov\u00e1;Ale\u0161 Pejchal;Andr\u00e1s Saj\u00f3;Andr\u00e9 Potocki;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Carlo Ranzoni;Dmitry Dedov;Guido Raimondi;Helena J\u00e4derblom;Iulia Motoc;Jon Fridrik Kj\u00f8lbro;Kristina Pardalos;Krzysztof Wojtyczek;Ledi Bianku;Luis L\u00f3pez Guerra;Mark Villiger;Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska;S\u00edofra O'Leary;Vincent A. De Gaetano;Gabriele Kucsko-Stadlmayer;Pere Pastor Vilanova", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0823JUD005916612" }, "218": { "webcast_id": "5916612_24022016", "hearing_date": "2016-02-24 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "J.K. and Others v. Sweden (no. 59166\/12)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "59166\/12", "case_id": "001-154980", "case_name": "CASE OF J.K. AND OTHERS v. SWEDEN", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-154980", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2015-06-04 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 3, "court": "23", "issue": "", "represented_by": "SKYFAROS C.", "respondent": "SWE", "articles": "3;35", "strasbourg_caselaw": "A. A. M. v. Sweden, no. 68519\/10, \u00a7 63, 3 April 2014;Abdulaziz, Cabales and Balkandali v. the United Kingdom, 28 May 1985, Series A no. 94, p. 34, \u00a7 67;Boujlifa v. France, 21 October 1997, Reports 1997 VI, p. 2264, \u00a7 42;Chahal v. the United Kingdom, 15 November 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-V, \u00a7 96;Collins and Akaziebie v. Sweden (dec.), no. 23944\/05, 8 March 2007;F.H. v. Sweden, no. 32621\/06, \u00a7 93, 20 January 2009;H.L.R. v. France, 29 April 1997, Reports 1997-III;Hakizimana v. Sweden (dec.), no. 37913\/05, 27 March 2008;Hilal v. the United Kingdom, no. 45276\/99, \u00a7 60, ECHR 2001-II;M.Y.H. and Others v. Sweden, no. 50859\/10, \u00a7 57, 27 June 2013;Maaouia v. France [GC], no. 39652\/98, \u00a7 40, ECHR 2000-;Mamatkulov and Askarov v. Turkey [GC], nos. 46827\/99 and 46951\/99, \u00a7 67, ECHR 2005-I;NA. v. the United Kingdom, no. 25904\/07, 17 July 2008;Saadi v. Italy [GC], no. 37201\/06, ECHR 2008-...;\u00dcner v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 46410\/99, \u00a7 54, ECHR 2006-XII", "external_sources": "UNHCR position on returns to Iraq of October 2014", "conclusion": "Remainder inadmissible;No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Expulsion) (Conditional) (Iraq)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Ale\u0161 Pejchal;Andr\u00e9 Potocki;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Helena J\u00e4derblom;Mark Villiger;Vincent A. De Gaetano", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0604JUD005916612" }, "219": { "webcast_id": "5916612_24022016", "hearing_date": "2016-02-24 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "J.K. and Others v. Sweden (no. 59166\/12)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "59166\/12", "case_id": "001-113710", "case_name": "J.K. AND OTHERS v. SWEDEN", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-113710", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "2012-09-18 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "SKYFAROS C.", "respondent": "SWE", "articles": "3", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "", "separate_opinion": "FALSE", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "220": { "webcast_id": "3423809_27012016", "hearing_date": "2016-01-27 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Lhermitte v. Belgium (no. 34238\/09)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "34238\/09", "case_id": "001-169053", "case_name": "CASE OF LHERMITTE v. BELGIUM", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-169053", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2016-11-29 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "", "represented_by": "MAGN\u00c9E X. ; CHIHAOUI Z.", "respondent": "BEL", "articles": "6;6-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Agnelet v. France, no. 61198\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 56-62, 10 January 2013;Bernard v. France, 23 April 1998, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-II;Bochan v. Ukraine (no. 2), no. 22251\/08, ECHR 2015;Bodein v. France, no. 40014\/10, 13 November 2014;Castellino v. Belgium, no. 504\/08, 25 July 2013;Devriendt v. Belgium, no. 32001\/07, 17 February 2015;Fraumens v. France, no. 30010\/10, 10 January 2013;Gybels v. Belgium, no. 43305\/09, 18 November 2014;Hechtermans v. Belgium, no. 56280\/09, 18 November 2014;Judge v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 35863\/10, 8 February 2011;Khaledian v. Belgium, no. 42874\/09, 18 November 2014;Kurt v. Belgium, no. 17663\/10, 17 February 2015;Legillon v. France, no. 53406\/10, 10 January 2013;Magy v. Belgium, no. 43137\/09, 24 February 2015;Maillard v. Belgium, no. 23530\/08, 17 February 2015;Oulahcene v. France, no. 44446\/10, 10 January 2013;Papon v. France (dec.), no. 54210\/00, ECHR 2001-XII;Salduz v. Turkey [GC], no. 36391\/02, \u00a7 54, ECHR 2008;Saric v. Denmark (dec.), no. 31913\/96, 2 February 1999;Schenk v. Switzerland, 12 July 1998, \u00a7 46, Series A no. 140;Shala v. Norway (dec.), no. 1195\/10, 10 July 2012;Suominen v. Finland, no. 37801\/97, \u00a7 37, 1 July 2003;Tatishvili v. Russia, no. 1509\/02, \u00a7 58, ECHR 2007-III;Taxquet v. Belgium [GC], no. 926\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 22-42, ECHR 2010;Voica v. France, no. 60995\/09, 10 January 2013;Yimam v. Belgium, no. 39781\/09, 18 November 2014", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Ale\u0161 Pejchal;Andr\u00e1s Saj\u00f3;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Armen Harutyunyan;Branko Lubarda;Guido Raimondi;Helen Keller;Helena J\u00e4derblom;Jon Fridrik Kj\u00f8lbro;Julia Laffranque;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Luis L\u00f3pez Guerra;Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska;Neboj\u0161a Vu\u010dini\u0107;Paul Lemmens;Robert Spano;St\u00e9phanie Mourou-Vikstr\u00f6m;Vincent A. De Gaetano;Yonko Grozev;Gabriele Kucsko-Stadlmayer;Georges Ravarani", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1129JUD003423809" }, "221": { "webcast_id": "3423809_27012016", "hearing_date": "2016-01-27 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Lhermitte v. Belgium (no. 34238\/09)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "34238\/09", "case_id": "001-155082", "case_name": "CASE OF LHERMITTE v. BELGIUM", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-155082", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2015-05-26 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 3, "court": "5", "issue": "", "represented_by": "MAGNEE X.", "respondent": "BEL", "articles": "6;6-1;35", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Agnelet v. France, no 61198\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 56-62, 10 January 2013;Castellino v. Belgium (dec.), no 504\/08, \u00a7 22, 22 May 2012;Castellino v. Belgium, no 504\/08, \u00a7 38, 25 July 2013;Kafkaris v. Cyprus [GC], no 21906\/04, \u00a7 97, ECHR 2008;Legillon v. France, no 53406\/10, \u00a7 61, 10 January 2013;Papon v. France (dec.), no 54210\/00, ECHR 2001-XII;Salduz v. Turkey [GC], no 36391\/02, \u00a7 54, ECHR 2008;Saric v. Denmark (dec.), no 31913\/96, 2 February 1999;Suominen v. Finland, no 37801\/97, \u00a7 37, 1 July 2003;Tatishvili v. Russia, no 1509\/02, \u00a7 58, ECHR 2007-III;Taxquet v. Belgium [GC], no 926\/05, ECHR 2010;Taxquet v. Belgium, no 926\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 71-74, 13 January 2009;Vinter and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 66069\/09, 130\/10 and 3896\/10, ECHR 2013 (extracts);Voica v. France, no 60995\/09, \u00a7 49, 10 January 2013;Zarouali v. Belgium, no 20664\/92, decision of the Commission of 29 June 1994, Decisions and Reports 78, p. 97", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Remainder inadmissible;No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Andr\u00e1s Saj\u00f3;Helen Keller;Jon Fridrik Kj\u00f8lbro;Neboj\u0161a Vu\u010dini\u0107;Paul Lemmens;Robert Spano", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0526JUD003423809" }, "222": { "webcast_id": "2413011_13012016", "hearing_date": "2016-01-13 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "A and B v. Norway (nos. 24130\/11 and 29758\/11)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "24130\/11", "case_id": "001-168972", "case_name": "CASE OF A AND B v. NORWAY", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-168972", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2016-11-15 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Sections 10 2(1), 10 4(1), 12-1(1)(a) and 12-2 of the Tax Assessment Act", "represented_by": "KJELDAHL R.", "respondent": "NOR", "articles": "P7-4", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Achour v. France [GC], no. 67335\/01, \u00a7 44, ECHR 2006 IV;Boman v. Finland, no. 41604\/11, 17 February 2015;Carlberg v. Sweden (dec.), no. 9631\/04, 27 January 2009;Engel and Others v. the Netherlands, 8 June 1976, \u00a7 82, Series A no. 22;Franz Fischer v. Austria, no. 37950\/97, \u00a7 29, 29 May 2001;Glantz v. Finland, no. 37394\/11, 20 May 2014;G\u00f6ktan v. France, no. 33402\/96, \u00a7 51, ECHR 2002 V;Gradinger v. Austria, 23 October 1995, \u00a7 51, Series A no. 328 C;Grande Stevens and Others v. Italy, nos. 18640\/10, 18647\/10, 18663\/10, 18668\/10 and 18698\/10, 4 March 2014;Haarvig v. Norway (dec.), no. 11187\/05, 11 December 2007;Janosevic v. Sweden, no. 34619\/97, \u00a7\u00a7 68-71, ECHR 2002-VII;Jussila v. Finland [GC], no. 73053\/01, \u00a7 43, ECHR 2006 XIV;Kapetanios and Others v. Greece, nos. 3453\/12, 42941\/12 and 9028\/13, \u00a772, 30 April 2015;Klass and Others v. Germany, 6 September 1978, \u00a7 68, Series A no. 28;Kud\u0142a v. Poland [GC], no. 30210\/96, \u00a7 152, ECHR 2000 XI;Lucky Dev v. Sweden, no. 7356\/10, 27 November 2014;Maaouia v. France [GC], no. 39652\/98, \u00a7 36, ECHR 2000-X;Manasson v. Sweden (dec.), no. 41265\/98, 8 April 2003;Mjelde v. Norway (dec.), no. 11143\/04, 11 February 2007;Muslija v. Bosnia and Herzegovina, no 32042\/11, 14 January 2014;Nyk\u00e4nen v. Finland, no. 11828\/11, 20 May 2014;\u00d6sterlund v. Finland, no. 53197\/13, 10 February 2015;Phillips v. the United Kingdom, no. 41087\/98, \u00a7 34, ECHR 2001 VII;R.T. v. Switzerland (dec.), no. 31982\/96, 30 May 2000;Rinas v. Finland, no. 17039\/13, 27 January 2015;Rosenquist v. Sweden (dec.), no. 60619\/00, 14 September 2004;Ruotsalainen v. Finland, no 13079\/03, 16 June 2009;Sismanidis and Sitaridis v. Greece, nos. 66602\/09 and 71879\/12, 9 June 2016;Stec and Others v. the United Kingdom (dec.) [GC], nos. 65731\/01 and 65900\/01, \u00a7 48, ECHR 2005 X;Storbr\u00e5ten v. Norway (dec.), no. 12277\/04, 1 February 2007;Synnelius and Edsbergs Taxi AB v. Sweden (dec.), no. 44298\/02, 17 June 2008;Taxquet v. Belgium [GC], no. 926\/05, \u00a7 83, ECHR 2010;Tomasovi\u0107 v. Croatia, no. 53785\/09, 18 October 2011;V\u00e4stberga Taxi Aktiebolag and Vulic v. Sweden, no. 36985\/97, \u00a7\u00a7 79-82, 23 July 2002;Sergey Zolotukhin v. Russia [GC], no. 14939\/03, ECHR 2009", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "No violation of Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 - Right not to be tried or punished twice-{general} (Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 - Right not to be tried or punished twice;Criminal offence)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Andr\u00e1s Saj\u00f3;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Armen Harutyunyan;Dag Bugge Nord\u00e9n;Erik M\u00f8se;Guido Raimondi;Julia Laffranque;Khanlar Hajiyev;Kristina Pardalos;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Luis L\u00f3pez Guerra;Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska;Nona Tsotsoria;Paul Lemmens;Paul Mahoney;Paulo Pinto De Albuquerque;Yonko Grozev;Gabriele Kucsko-Stadlmayer;Ksenija Turkovi\u0107", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1115JUD002413011" }, "223": { "webcast_id": "2413011_13012016", "hearing_date": "2016-01-13 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "A and B v. Norway (nos. 24130\/11 and 29758\/11)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "24130\/11", "case_id": "001-139690", "case_name": "A AND B v. NORWAY", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-139690", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "KJELDAHL R.", "respondent": "NOR", "articles": "P7-4", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "", "separate_opinion": "", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "224": { "webcast_id": "2413011_13012016", "hearing_date": "2016-01-13 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "A and B v. Norway (nos. 24130\/11 and 29758\/11)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "29758\/11", "case_id": "001-168972", "case_name": "CASE OF A AND B v. NORWAY", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-168972", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2016-11-15 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Sections 10 2(1), 10 4(1), 12-1(1)(a) and 12-2 of the Tax Assessment Act", "represented_by": "KJELDAHL R.", "respondent": "NOR", "articles": "P7-4", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Achour v. France [GC], no. 67335\/01, \u00a7 44, ECHR 2006 IV;Boman v. Finland, no. 41604\/11, 17 February 2015;Carlberg v. Sweden (dec.), no. 9631\/04, 27 January 2009;Engel and Others v. the Netherlands, 8 June 1976, \u00a7 82, Series A no. 22;Franz Fischer v. Austria, no. 37950\/97, \u00a7 29, 29 May 2001;Glantz v. Finland, no. 37394\/11, 20 May 2014;G\u00f6ktan v. France, no. 33402\/96, \u00a7 51, ECHR 2002 V;Gradinger v. Austria, 23 October 1995, \u00a7 51, Series A no. 328 C;Grande Stevens and Others v. Italy, nos. 18640\/10, 18647\/10, 18663\/10, 18668\/10 and 18698\/10, 4 March 2014;Haarvig v. Norway (dec.), no. 11187\/05, 11 December 2007;Janosevic v. Sweden, no. 34619\/97, \u00a7\u00a7 68-71, ECHR 2002-VII;Jussila v. Finland [GC], no. 73053\/01, \u00a7 43, ECHR 2006 XIV;Kapetanios and Others v. Greece, nos. 3453\/12, 42941\/12 and 9028\/13, \u00a772, 30 April 2015;Klass and Others v. Germany, 6 September 1978, \u00a7 68, Series A no. 28;Kud\u0142a v. Poland [GC], no. 30210\/96, \u00a7 152, ECHR 2000 XI;Lucky Dev v. Sweden, no. 7356\/10, 27 November 2014;Maaouia v. France [GC], no. 39652\/98, \u00a7 36, ECHR 2000-X;Manasson v. Sweden (dec.), no. 41265\/98, 8 April 2003;Mjelde v. Norway (dec.), no. 11143\/04, 11 February 2007;Muslija v. Bosnia and Herzegovina, no 32042\/11, 14 January 2014;Nyk\u00e4nen v. Finland, no. 11828\/11, 20 May 2014;\u00d6sterlund v. Finland, no. 53197\/13, 10 February 2015;Phillips v. the United Kingdom, no. 41087\/98, \u00a7 34, ECHR 2001 VII;R.T. v. Switzerland (dec.), no. 31982\/96, 30 May 2000;Rinas v. Finland, no. 17039\/13, 27 January 2015;Rosenquist v. Sweden (dec.), no. 60619\/00, 14 September 2004;Ruotsalainen v. Finland, no 13079\/03, 16 June 2009;Sismanidis and Sitaridis v. Greece, nos. 66602\/09 and 71879\/12, 9 June 2016;Stec and Others v. the United Kingdom (dec.) [GC], nos. 65731\/01 and 65900\/01, \u00a7 48, ECHR 2005 X;Storbr\u00e5ten v. Norway (dec.), no. 12277\/04, 1 February 2007;Synnelius and Edsbergs Taxi AB v. Sweden (dec.), no. 44298\/02, 17 June 2008;Taxquet v. Belgium [GC], no. 926\/05, \u00a7 83, ECHR 2010;Tomasovi\u0107 v. Croatia, no. 53785\/09, 18 October 2011;V\u00e4stberga Taxi Aktiebolag and Vulic v. Sweden, no. 36985\/97, \u00a7\u00a7 79-82, 23 July 2002;Sergey Zolotukhin v. Russia [GC], no. 14939\/03, ECHR 2009", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "No violation of Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 - Right not to be tried or punished twice-{general} (Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 - Right not to be tried or punished twice;Criminal offence)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Andr\u00e1s Saj\u00f3;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Armen Harutyunyan;Dag Bugge Nord\u00e9n;Erik M\u00f8se;Guido Raimondi;Julia Laffranque;Khanlar Hajiyev;Kristina Pardalos;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Luis L\u00f3pez Guerra;Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska;Nona Tsotsoria;Paul Lemmens;Paul Mahoney;Paulo Pinto De Albuquerque;Yonko Grozev;Gabriele Kucsko-Stadlmayer;Ksenija Turkovi\u0107", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1115JUD002413011" }, "225": { "webcast_id": "2413011_13012016", "hearing_date": "2016-01-13 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "A and B v. Norway (nos. 24130\/11 and 29758\/11)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "29758\/11", "case_id": "001-139690", "case_name": "A AND B v. NORWAY", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-139690", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "KJELDAHL R.", "respondent": "NOR", "articles": "P7-4", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "", "separate_opinion": "", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "226": { "webcast_id": "733413_06012016", "hearing_date": "2016-01-06 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Mur\u0161i\u0107 v. Croatia (no. 7334\/13)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "7334\/13", "case_id": "001-167483", "case_name": "CASE OF MUR\u0160I\u0106 v. CROATIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-167483", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2016-10-20 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Articles 23 and 25 of the Constitution ; Sections 2, 3, 6, 9, 14, 15, 17, 74, 76, 78, 80 and 96 of the Enforcement of Prison Sentences Act\r\n", "represented_by": "VIDOVIC Z.", "respondent": "HRV", "articles": "3;35;35-1;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "A.F. v. Greece, no. 53709\/11, \u00a7\u00a7 77-78, 13 June 2013;Al. K. v. Greece, no. 63542\/11, 11 December 2014;Alexov v. Bulgaria, no. 54578\/00, \u00a7\u00a7 106-108, 22 May 2008;Ali\u0161i\u0107 and Others v. Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Serbia, Slovenia and the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia [GC], no. 60642\/08, \u00a7 78, ECHR 2014;Ananyev and Others v. Russia, nos. 42525\/07 and 60800\/08, 10 January 2012;Andrei Georgiev v. Bulgaria, no. 61507\/00, \u00a7\u00a7 57-62, 26 July 2007;Apostu v. Romania, no. 22765\/12, \u00a7 79, 3 February 2015;Asyanov v. Russia, no. 25462\/09, \u00a7 43, 9 October 2012;Barilo v. Ukraine, no. 9607\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 80-83, 16 May 2013;Bleju\u015fc\u0103 v. Romania, no. 7910\/10, \u00a7\u00a7 43-45, 19 March 2013;Bouyid v. Belgium [GC], no. 23380\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 81-86, ECHR 2015;Bu\u010dkal v. Croatia (dec.), no. 29597\/10, \u00a7 20, 3 April 2012;Bulatovi\u0107 v. Montenegro, no. 67320\/10, \u00a7\u00a7 123-127, 22 July 2014;Butko v. Russia, no. 32036\/10, \u00a7 52, 12 November 2015;Cenbauer v. Croatia, no. 73786\/01, ECHR 2006-III;Christine Goodwin v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 28957\/95, \u00a7 74, ECHR 2002\u2011VI;Cotle\u0163 v. Romania (no. 2), no. 49549\/11, \u00a7\u00a7 34 and 36, 1 October 2013;Culev v. Moldova, no. 60179\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 35-39, 17 April 2012;Dmitriy Rozhin v. Russia, no. 4265\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 52-53, 23 October 2012;Dolenec v. Croatia, no. 25282\/06, 26 November 2009;G.C. v. Italy, no. 73869\/10, \u00a7 81, 22 April 2014;Georgia v. Russia (I) [GC], no. 13255\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 192-205, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Gherghina v. Romania (dec.) [GC], no. 42219\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 84-87, 9 July 2015;Golubenko v. Ukraine (dec.), no. 36327\/06, \u00a7 52, 5 November 2013;Gorbulya v. Russia, no. 31535\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 64-65, 6 March 2014;Iacov Stanciu v. Romania, no. 35972\/05, 24 July 2012;Idalov v. Russia case [GC], no. 5826\/03, \u00a7\u00a7 91-102, 22 May 2012;Ildani v. Georgia, no. 65391\/09, \u00a7 27, 23 April 2013;Ireland v. the United Kingdom, 18 January 1978, \u00a7 162, Series A no. 25;Ivakhnenko v. Russia, no. 12622\/04, \u00a7 35, 4 April 2013;Ja\u0107imovi\u0107 v. Croatia, no. 22688\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 40-41, 31 October 2013;Jalloh v. Germany [GC], no. 54810\/00, \u00a7 67, ECHR 2006 IX;Jirs\u00e1k v. the Czech Republic, no. 8968\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 63-73, 5 April 2012;Kadi\u0137is v. Latvia (no. 2), no. 62393\/00, \u00a7 55, 4 May 2006;Kalashnikov v. Russia, no. 47095\/99, \u00a7 95, ECHR 2002 VI;Kanakis v. Greece (no. 2), no. 40146\/11, \u00a7\u00a7 106-107, 12 December 2013;Kokoshkina v. Russia, no. 2052\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 62-63, 28 May 2009;Kud\u0142a v. Poland [GC], no. 30210\/96, \u00a7\u00a7 92-94, ECHR 2000 XI;Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772\/95, \u00a7 119, ECHR 2000-IV;Lin v. Greece, no. 58158\/10, \u00a7\u00a7 53-54, 6 November 2012;Lind v. Russia, no. 25664\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 59-61, 6 December 2007;Logothetis and Others v. Greece, no. 740\/13, \u00a7 40, 25 September 2014;Longin v. Croatia, no. 49268\/10, 6 November 2012;Loni\u0107 v. Croatia, no. 8067\/12, 4 December 2014;Mamedova v. Russia, no. 7064\/05, \u00a7 63, 1 June 2006;Mandi\u0107 and Jovi\u0107 v. Slovenia, nos. 5774\/10 and 5985\/10, 20 October 2011;Manulin v. Russia, no. 26676\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 47-48, 11 April 2013;Mironovas and Others v. Lithuania, nos. 40828\/12, 29292\/12, 69598\/12, 40163\/13, 66281\/13, 70048\/13 and 70065\/13, \u00a7\u00a7 118-123, 8 December 2015;Mozer v. the Republic of Moldova and Russia [GC], no. 11138\/10, \u00a7 178, ECHR 2016;Neshkov and Others v. Bulgaria, nos. 36925\/10, 21487\/12, 72893\/12, 73196\/12, 77718\/12 and 9717\/13, 27 January 2015;Nieciecki v. Greece, no. 11677\/11, \u00a7\u00a7 49-51, 4 December 2012;Norbert Sikorski v. Poland, no. 17599\/05, 22 October 2009;Olszewski v. Poland, no. 21880\/03, \u00a7 98, 2 April 2013;Orchowski v. Poland, no. 17885\/04, 22 October 2009;Peers v. Greece, no. 28524\/95, \u00a7 74, ECHR 2001 III;Pe\u0161a v. Croatia, no. 40523\/08, \u00a7 80, 8 April 2010;Polufakin and Chernyshev v. Russia, no. 30997\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 155-156, 25 September 2008;Pozai\u0107 c. Croatie, no 5901\/13, \u00a7 59, 4 d\u00e9cembre 2014;Pretty v. the United Kingdom, no. 2346\/02, \u00a7 52, ECHR 2002 III;Sabri G\u00fcne\u015f v. Turkey [GC], no. 27396\/06, \u00a7 50, 29 June 2012;Samaras and Others v. Greece, no. 11463\/09, 28 February 2012;Scoppola v. Italy (no. 2) [GC], no. 10249\/03, \u00a7 104, 17 September 2009;Semikhvostov v. Russia, no. 2689\/12, \u00a7 79, 6 February 2014;Sergey Babushkin v. Russia, no. 5993\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 51-56, 28 November 2013;Shilbergs v. Russia, no. 20075\/03, \u00a7 97, 17 December 2009;Shishanov v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 11353\/06, 15 September 2015;Shishkov v. Russia, no. 26746\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 90-94, 20 February 2014;\u0160titi\u0107 v. Croatia (dec.), no. 29660\/03, 9 November 2006;\u0160titi\u0107 v. Croatia, no. 29660\/03, 8 November 2007;Story and Others v. Malta, nos. 56854\/13, 57005\/13 and 57043\/13, \u00a7\u00a7 112-113, 29 October 2015;\u0160trucl and Others v. Slovenia, nos. 5903\/10, 6003\/10 and 6544\/10, 20 October 2011;Suldin v. Russia, no. 20077\/04, \u00a7 43, 16 October 2014;Sulejmanovic v. Italy, no. 22635\/03, \u00a7 43, 16 July 2009;Svinarenko and Slyadnev v. Russia [GC], nos. 32541\/08 and 43441\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 113-114, ECHR 2014 (extracts);T. and A. v. Turkey, no. 47146\/11, \u00a7\u00a7 96-98, 21 October 2014;Tehrani and Others v. Turkey, nos. 32940\/08, 41626\/08 and 43616\/08, \u00a7 88, 13 April 2010;Tellissi v. Italy (dec.), no. 15434\/11, \u00a7 53, 5 March 2013;Testa v. Croatia, no. 20877\/04, 12 July 2007;Tomoiag\u0103 v. Romania (dec.), no. 47775\/10, \u00a7\u00a7 22-23, 20 January 2015;Torreggiani and Others v. Italy, nos. 43517\/09, 46882\/09, 55400\/09, 57875\/09, 61535\/09, 35315\/10 and 37818\/10, 8 January 2013;Trepashkin v. Russia (no. 2), no. 14248\/05, \u00a7 113, 16 December 2010;Trepashkin v. Russia, no. 36898\/03, \u00a7 92, 19 July 2007;Tzamalis and Others v. Greece, no. 15894\/09, 4 December 2012;Vala\u0161inas v. Lithuania, no. 44558\/98, \u00a7 102, ECHR 2001 VIII;Varga and Others v. Hungary, nos. 14097\/12, 45135\/12, 73712\/12, 34001\/13, 44055\/13, and 64586\/13, 10 March 2015;Vasilescu v. Belgium, no. 64682\/12, 25 November 2014;Vladimir Belyayev v. Russia, no. 9967\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 33-36, 17 October 2013;Vu\u010dkovi\u0107 and Others v. Serbia (preliminary objection) [GC], nos. 17153\/11 and 29 others, \u00a7 72, 25 March 2014;Yefimenko v. Russia, no. 152\/04, \u00a7\u00a7 80-84, 12 February 2013;Zuyev v. Russia, no. 16262\/05, \u00a7 59, 19 February 2013", "external_sources": "Explanatory report to the Convention for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or punishment of the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment;First General Report, CPT\/Inf (91) 3;CPT Standards (CPT\/Inf\/E (2002));CPT Standards (CPT\/Inf (2015) 44);CPT\/Inf (2014) 9;European Prison Rules;Recommendation No. R (99) 22;Appendix to Recommendation No. R (99) 22;The United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners (the Mandela Rules), A\/C.3\/70\/L.3, 29 September 2015\r\n", "conclusion": "Preliminary objection dismissed (Article 35-1 - Exhaustion of domestic remedies);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": null, "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1020JUD000733413" }, "227": { "webcast_id": "733413_06012016", "hearing_date": "2016-01-06 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Mur\u0161i\u0107 v. Croatia (no. 7334\/13)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "7334\/13", "case_id": "001-152730", "case_name": "CASE OF MUR\u0160I\u0106 v. CROATIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-152730", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 14, "document_date": "2015-03-12 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 3, "court": "4", "issue": "Enforcement of Prison Sentences Act", "represented_by": "VIDOVIC Z.", "respondent": "HRV", "articles": "3;35", "strasbourg_caselaw": "A.F. v. Greece, no. 53709\/11, \u00a7\u00a7 71-80, 13 June 2013;Alver v. Estonia, no. 64812\/01, 8 November 2005;Ananyev and Others v. Russia, nos. 42525\/07 and 60800\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 148-149, 10 January 2012;Azinas v. Cyprus [GC], no. 56679\/00, \u00a7 38, ECHR 2004 III;Balogh v. Hungary, no. 47940\/99, \u00a7 30, 20 July 2004;Barilo v. Ukraine, no. 9607\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 80-83, 16 May 2013;Bu\u010dkal v. Croatia (dec.), no. 29597\/10, \u00a7 20, 3 April 2012;Bulatovi\u0107 v. Montenegro, no. 67320\/10, \u00a7\u00a7 123-127, 22 July 2014;Culev v. Moldova, no. 60179\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 35-39, 17 April 2012;Dmitriy Rozhin v. Russia, no. 4265\/06, \u00a7 53, 23 October 2012;Dmitriy Sazonov v. Russia, no. 30268\/03, \u00a7\u00a7 31-32, 1 March 2012;Dolenec v. Croatia, no. 25282\/06, \u00a7 113, 26 November 2009;Dougoz v. Greece, no. 40907\/98, \u00a7 46, ECHR 2001-II;Fetisov and Others v. Russia, nos. 43710\/07, 6023\/08, 11248\/08, 27668\/08, 31242\/08 and 52133\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 134-138, 17 January 2012;Gorbulya v. Russia, no. 31535\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 64-65, 6 March 2014;Horshill v. Greece, no. 70427\/11, \u00a7\u00a7 47-52, 1 August 2013;Idalov v. Russia [GC], no. 5826\/03, \u00a7 94, 22 May 2012;Ireland v. the United Kingdom, 18 January 1978, \u00a7 162, Series A no. 25;Ja\u0107imovi\u0107 v. Croatia, no. 22688\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 40-41, 31 October 2013;Jirs\u00e1k v. the Czech Republic, no. 8968\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 64-73, 5 April 2012;Kanakis v. Greece (no. 2), no. 40146\/11, \u00a7\u00a7 106-107, 12 December 2013;Karalevi\u010dius v. Lithuania, no. 53254\/99, \u00a7 36, 7 April 2005;Khuroshvili v. Greece, no. 58165\/10, \u00a7\u00a7 84-89, 12 December 2013;Kud\u0142a v. Poland [GC], no. 30210\/96, \u00a7\u00a7 92-94, ECHR 2000 XI;Kulikov v. Russia, no. 48562\/06, \u00a7 37, 27 November 2012;Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772\/95, \u00a7 119, ECHR 2000-IV;Logothetis and Others v. Greece, no. 740\/13, \u00a7\u00a7 40-41, 25 September 2014;Longin v. Croatia, no. 49268\/10, 6 November 2012;Manulin v. Russia, no. 26676\/06, \u00a7 46, 11 April 2013;Merot d.o.o. and Storitve Tir d.o.o. v. Croatia (dec.), nos. 29426\/08 and 29737\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 35-36, 10 December 2013;Nieciecki v. Greece, no. 11677\/11, \u00a7\u00a7 49-51, 4 December 2012;Nikolaos Athanasiou and Others v. Greece, no. 36546\/10, \u00a7 77, 23 October 2014;Norbert Sikorski v. Poland, no. 17599\/05, \u00a7 129, 22 October 2009;Olszewski v. Poland, no. 21880\/03, \u00a7 98, 2 April 2013;Orchowski v. Poland, no. 17885\/04, \u00a7 119, 22 October 2009;Pe\u0161a v. Croatia, no. 40523\/08, \u00a7 80, 8 April 2010;Popov v. Russia, no. 26853\/04, \u00a7 208, 13 July 2006;Pretty v. the United Kingdom, no. 2346\/02, \u00a7 52, ECHR 2002-III;Semikhvostov v. Russia, no. 2689\/12, \u00a7 79, 6 February 2014;Sergey Babushkin v. Russia, no. 5993\/08, 28 November 2013;Shkurenko v. Russia (dec.), no. 15010\/04, 10 September 2009;\u015alusarczyk v. Poland, no. 23463\/04, \u00a7\u00a7 136-140, 28 October 201;\u0160titi\u0107 v. Croatia (dec.), no. 29660\/03, 9 November 2006;Suldin v. Russia, no. 20077\/04, \u00a7 43, 16 October 2014;T. and A. v. Turkey, no. 47146\/11, \u00a7 96, 21 October 2014;Tatishvili v. Greece, no. 26452\/11, \u00a7 43, 31 July 2014;Tereshchenko v. Russia, no. 33761\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 83-84, 5 June 2014;Torreggiani and Others v. Italy, nos. 43517\/09, 46882\/09, 55400\/09, 57875\/09, 61535\/09, 35315\/10 and 37818\/10, 8 January 2013;Trepashkin v. Russia, no. 36898\/03, \u00a7 92, 19 July 2007;Vanjak v. Croatia, no. 29889\/04, \u00a7 77, 14 January 2010;Vladimir Belyayev v. Russia, no. 9967\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 32-36, 17 October 2013;Yepishin v. Russia, no. 591\/07, \u00a7 65, 27 June 2013;Yevgeniy Alekseyenko v. Russia, no. 41833\/04, \u00a7 87, 27 January 2011", "external_sources": "Report of the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (\u201cthe CPT\u201d) CPT\/Inf (2014) 9 of 18 March 2014", "conclusion": "Remainder inadmissible;No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Dmitry Dedov;Erik M\u00f8se;Julia Laffranque;Khanlar Hajiyev;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Ksenija Turkovi\u0107", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0312JUD000733413" }, "228": { "webcast_id": "733413_06012016", "hearing_date": "2016-01-06 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Mur\u0161i\u0107 v. Croatia (no. 7334\/13)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "7334\/13", "case_id": "001-127971", "case_name": "MUR\u0160I\u0106 v. CROATIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-127971", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "2013-10-08 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "VIDOVIC Z.", "respondent": "HRV", "articles": "3;13", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "", "separate_opinion": "FALSE", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "229": { "webcast_id": "5308013_16122015", "hearing_date": "2015-12-16 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "B\u00e9l\u00e1n\u00e9 Nagy v. Hungary (no. 53080\/13)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "53080\/13", "case_id": "001-169663", "case_name": "CASE OF B\u00c9L\u00c1N\u00c9 NAGY v. HUNGARY", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-169663", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2016-12-13 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Act no. XX of 1949 on the Constitution ; Article XIX of the Fundamental Law Act no. LXXXI of 1997 on Social-Security Pensions\n", "represented_by": "CECH A.", "respondent": "HUN", "articles": "35;35-3;41;P1-1;P1-1-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Alajos Kiss v. Hungary, no. 38832\/06, \u00a7 42, 20 May 2010;Anheuser-Busch Inv. v. Portugal [GC], no. 73049\/01, \u00a7 65, ECHR 2007-I;Antoni Lewandowski v. Poland, no. 38459\/03, \u00a7\u00a7 78 and 82, 2 October 2012;Apostolakis v. Greece, no. 39574\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 28 and 35, 22 October 2009;Bellet, Huertas and Vialatte v. France (dec.), nos. 40832\/98, 40833\/98 and 40906\/98, 27 April 1999;Beyeler v. Italy [GC], no. 33202\/96, \u00a7\u00a7 100-105, ECHR 2000-I;Carson and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 42184\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 85-89, ECHR 2010;Da Concei\u00e7\u00e3o Mateus and Santos Janu\u00e1rio v. Portugal (dec.), nos. 62235\/12 and 57725\/12, \u00a7 22, 8 October 2013;Da Silva Carvalho Rico v. Portugal (dec.), no. 13341\/14, \u00a7 37, 1 September 2015;Domalewski, v. Poland (dec.), no. 34610\/97, ECHR 1999 V;Fakas v. Ukraine (dec.), no. 4519\/11, \u00a7\u00a7 34, 37-43, 48, 3 June 2014;Former King of Greece and Others v. Greece [GC], no. 25701\/94, \u00a7 87, ECHR 2000 XII;Frimu and Others v. Romania (dec.), nos. 45312\/11, 45581\/11, 45583\/11, 45587\/1 and 45588\/11, \u00a7 40, 13 December 2012;Gaygusuz v. Austria, no. 17371\/90, 16 September 1996, \u00a7 41;Gogitidze and Others v. Georgia, no. 36862\/05, \u00a7 96, 12 May 2015;Goudswaard-Van der Lans v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 75255\/01, ECHR 2005-XI;Gratzinger and Gratzingerova v. the Czech Republic (dec.) [GC], no. 39794\/98, \u00a7\u00a7 69- 74, ECHR 2002-VII;Grudi\u0107 v. Serbia, no. 31925\/08, 17 April 2012;Iatridis v. Greece [GC], no. 31107\/96, ECHR 1999-II;Jahn and Others v. Germany [GC], nos. 46720\/99, 72203\/01 and 72552\/01, \u00a7\u00a7 81-94, ECHR 2005 VI;James and Others v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1986, \u00a7 37, Series A no. 98;K. and T. v. Finland [GC], no. 25702\/94, \u00a7 141, ECHR 2001-VII;Kar\u00e1csony and Others v. Hungary [GC], no. 42461\/13, \u00a7 156, 17 May 2016;Kjartan \u00c1smundsson v. Iceland, no. 60669\/00, \u00a7\u00a7 39-45, ECHR 2004 IX;Klein v. Austria, no. 57028\/00, \u00a7\u00a7 45-46, 3 March 2011;Kolesnyk v. Ukraine (dec.), no. 57116\/10, \u00a7\u00a7 83, 89 and 91, 3 June 2014;Kopeck\u00fd v. Slovakia [GC], no. 44912\/98, ECHR 2004-IX;Koua Poirrez v. France, no. 40892\/98, \u00a7\u00a7 37-42, ECHR 2003-X;Koufaki and ADEDY v. Greece (dec.), nos. 57665\/12 and 57657\/12, \u00a7\u00a7 37 and 39, 7 May 2013;Laki\u0107evi\u0107 and Others v. Montenegro and Serbia, nos. 27458\/06, 37205\/06, 37207\/06 and 33604\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 70-72, 13 December 2011;Maggio and Others v. Italy, nos. 46286\/09, 52851\/08, 53727\/08, 54486\/08 and 56001\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 61-63, 31 May 2011;Maurice v. France [GC], no. 11810\/03, \u00a7 67, ECHR 2005 IX;Moskal v. Poland, no. 10373\/05, \u00a7 41, 15 September 2009;M\u00fcller v. Austria, no. 5849\/72, Commission Report of 1 October 1975, DR 3, p. 25, \u00a7 30;N.K.M. v. Hungary, no. 66529\/11, \u00a7\u00a7 49 and 61, 14 May 2013;Panfile v. Roumania (dec.), no. 13902\/11, 20 March 2012;Parrillo v. Italy [GC], no. 46470\/11, \u00a7 211, ECHR 2015;Pine Valley Developments Ltd and Others v. Ireland, 29 November 1991, \u00a7 51, Series A no. 222;Pressos Compania Naviera S.A. and Others v. Belgium, 20 November 1995, \u00a7 43, Series A no. 332;R.P. and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 38245\/08, \u00a7 47, 9 October 2012;Rasmussen v. Poland, no. 38886\/05, 28 April 2009;Richardson v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 26252\/08, 10 April 2012;Sargsyan v. Azerbaijan [GC], no. 40167\/06, ECHR 2015;Savickas v. Lithuania and Others (dec.), no. 66365\/09, 15 October 2013;Sk\u00f3rkiewicz v. Poland (dec.), no. 39860\/98, 1 June 1999;Sporrong and L\u00f6nnroth v. Sweden, 23 September 1982, \u00a7\u00a7 69-74, Series A no. 52;Stec and Others v. the United Kingdom (dec.) [GC], nos. 65731\/01 and 65900\/01, ECHR 2005-X;Stefanetti and Others v. Italy, nos. 21838\/10, 21849\/10, 21852\/10, 21822\/10, 21860\/10, 21863\/10, 21869\/10, and 21870\/10, 15 April 2014;Stretch v. the United Kingdom, no. 44277\/98, \u00a7 35, 24 June 2003;Stummer v. Austria [GC], no. 37452\/02, \u00a7 82, ECHR 2011;Sukhanov and Ilchenko v. Ukraine, nos. 68385\/10 and 71378\/10, \u00a7\u00a7 35-39, 26 June 2014;T. v. Sweden, no. 10671\/83, decision of the Commission of 4 March 1985, DR 42, pp. 229-232;Valkov and Others v. Bulgaria, nos. 2033\/04, 19125\/04, 19475\/04, 19490\/04, 19495\/04, 19497\/04, 24729\/04, 171\/05 and 2041\/05, 25 October 2011;Visti\u0146\u0161 and Perepjolkins v. Latvia [GC], no. 71243\/01, \u00a7 96, 25 October 2012;Wieczorek v. Poland, no. 18176\/05, 8 December 2009", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Article 35-3 - Ratione materiae);Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Deprivation of property;Peaceful enjoyment of possessions);Pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Andr\u00e1s Saj\u00f3;Andr\u00e9 Potocki;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Branko Lubarda;Egidijus K\u016bris;Erik M\u00f8se;Ganna Yudkivska;George Nicolaou;Guido Raimondi;Helen Keller;Jon Fridrik Kj\u00f8lbro;Julia Laffranque;Krzysztof Wojtyczek;Ledi Bianku;Luis L\u00f3pez Guerra;Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska;Neboj\u0161a Vu\u010dini\u0107;Nona Tsotsoria;P\u00e4ivi Hirvel\u00e4;Paul Lemmens;Robert Spano;S\u00edofra O'Leary", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1213JUD005308013" }, "230": { "webcast_id": "5308013_16122015", "hearing_date": "2015-12-16 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "B\u00e9l\u00e1n\u00e9 Nagy v. Hungary (no. 53080\/13)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "53080\/13", "case_id": "001-150998", "case_name": "CASE OF B\u00c9L\u00c1N\u00c9 NAGY v. HUNGARY", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-150998", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2015-02-10 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 3, "court": "5", "issue": "", "represented_by": "CECH A.", "respondent": "HUN", "articles": "35;41;P1-1;P1-1-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Akdivar and Others v. Turkey, 16 September 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996\u2011IV;Amuur v. France, 25 June 1996, \u00a7 50, Reports 1996 III;Aunola v. Finland (dec.), no. 30517\/96, 15 March 2001;Banfield v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 6223\/04, 18 October 2005;B\u00e9la Szab\u00f3 v. Hungary, no. 37470\/06, 9 December 2008;Gratzinger and Gratzingerova v. the Czech Republic (dec.), no. 39794\/98, \u00a7 73, ECHR 2002 VII;Jahn and Others v. Germany [GC], nos. 46720\/99, 72203\/01 and 72552\/01, \u00a7\u00a7 81-94, ECHR 2005-VI;Kjartan \u00c1smundsson v. Iceland, no. 60669\/00, ECHR 2004 IX;Laki\u0107evi\u0107 and Others v. Montenegro and Serbia, nos. 27458\/06, 37205\/06, 37207\/06 and 33604\/07, \u00a7 70, 13 December 2011;Maggio and Others v. Italy, nos. 46286\/09, 52851\/08, 53727\/08, 54486\/08 and 56001\/08, \u00a7 62, 31 May 2011;Moskal v. Poland, no. 10373\/05, \u00a7 39, 15 September 2009;Rasmussen v. Poland, no. 38886\/05, \u00a7 71, 28 April 2009;Sporrong and L\u00f6nnroth v. Sweden, 23 September 1982, \u00a7\u00a7 69-74, Series A no. 52;Stec and Others v. the United Kingdom (dec.) [GC], nos. 65731\/01 and 65900\/01, ECHR 2005 X;Terazzi S.r.l. v. Italy, no. 27265\/95, \u00a7 85, 17 October 2002;Van der Mussele v. Belgium, 23 November 1983, \u00a7 48, Series A no. 70;Wieczorek v. Poland, no. 18176\/05, 8 December 2009", "external_sources": "Article 57 \u00a7 1(b) of the ILO Convention on Social Security;Ethical guidelines of the WHO\u2019s document on International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health\n", "conclusion": "Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions);Pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Andr\u00e1s Saj\u00f3;Egidijus K\u016bris;Helen Keller;Jon Fridrik Kj\u00f8lbro;Neboj\u0161a Vu\u010dini\u0107;Robert Spano", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0210JUD005308013" }, "231": { "webcast_id": "5308013_16122015", "hearing_date": "2015-12-16 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "B\u00e9l\u00e1n\u00e9 Nagy v. Hungary (no. 53080\/13)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "53080\/13", "case_id": "001-141194", "case_name": "B\u00c9L\u00c1N\u00c9 NAGY v. HUNGARY", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-141194", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "", "respondent": "HUN", "articles": "P1-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "", "separate_opinion": "", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "232": { "webcast_id": "2535812_09122015", "hearing_date": "2015-12-09 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Paradiso and Campanelli v. Italy (no. 25358\/12)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "25358\/12", "case_id": "001-170359", "case_name": "CASE OF PARADISO AND CAMPANELLI v. ITALY", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-170359", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2017-01-24 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Private International Law Act (Law no. 218\/1995) ; Articles 6, 8, 37bis and 72 of the Adoption Act (Law no. 184\/1983) ; Medically Assisted Reproduction Act (Law no. 40\/2004)\n", "represented_by": "SPINOSI P.", "respondent": "ITA", "articles": "8;8-1;8-2;35", "strasbourg_caselaw": "A, B and C v. Ireland [GC], no 25579\/05, ECHR 2010;Abdulaziz, Cabales and Balkandali v. the United Kingdom, 28 May 1985, \u00a7 62, Series A no 94;Anayo v. Germany, no 20578\/07, \u00a7 61, 21 December 2010;Azinas v. Cyprus [GC], no 56679\/00, \u00a7 32, ECHR 2004-III;Centro Europa 7 S.r.l. and Di Stefano v. Italy [GC], no 38433\/09, \u00a7 140, ECHR 2012;D. and Others v. Belgium (dec.), no 29176\/13, \u00a7 49, 8 July 2014;Delfi AS v. Estonia [GC], no 64569\/09, \u00a7 127, ECHR 2015;Dickson v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 44362\/04, ECHR 2007-V;E.B. v. France [GC], no 43546\/02, \u00a7 41, 22 January 2008;Evans v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 6339\/05, ECHR 2007-I;Giusto, Bornacin and V. v. Italy (dec.), no 38972\/06, 15 May 2007;H\u00e4m\u00e4l\u00e4inen v. Finland [GC], no 37359\/09, \u00a7 67, ECHR 2014;Johnston and Others v. Ireland, 18 December 1986, \u00a7 55, Series A no 112;K. and T. v. Finland [GC], no 25702\/94, \u00a7 141, ECHR 2001-VII;Keegan v. Ireland, 26 May 1994, \u00a7 44, Series A no 290;Kopf and Liberda v. Austria, no 1598\/06, \u00a7 37, 17 January 2012;Kopp v. Switzerland, 25 March 1998, \u00a7 59, Reports 1998-II;Kroon and Others v. the Netherlands, 27 October 1994, \u00a7 30, Series A no 297-C;Kruslin v. France, 24 April 1990, \u00a7 29, Series A no 176-A;Kutzner v. Germany, no 46544\/99, \u00a7\u00a7 67-82, ECHR 2002 I;Labassee v. France, no 65941\/11, 26 June 2014;Marckx v. Belgium, 13 June 1979, \u00a7 31, Series A no 31;Mennesson v. France, no 65192\/11, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Mikuli\u0107 v. Croatia, no 53176\/99, \u00a7 53, ECHR 2002-I;Moretti and Benedetti v. Italy, no 16318\/07, \u00a7 48, 27 April 2010;Nazarenko v. Russia, no 39438\/13, \u00a7 58, ECHR 2015 (extracts);Neulinger and Shuruk v. Switzerland [GC], no 41615\/07, \u00a7 136, ECHR 2010;Niemietz v. Germany, 16 December 1992, \u00a7 29, Series A no 251-B;Nylund v. Finland (dec.), no 27110\/95, ECHR 1999-VI;Olsson v. Sweden (no 1), 24 March 1988, \u00a7 54, Series A no 130;Parrillo v. Italy [GC], no 46470\/11, \u00a7 168, ECHR 2015;Pini and Others v. Romania, nos. 78028\/01 and 78030\/01, \u00a7 148, ECHR 2004 V (extracts);Pontes v. Portugal, no 19554\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 74-80, 10 April 2012;Rotaru v. Romania [GC], no 28341\/95, \u00a7 52, ECHR 2000-V;S.H. and Others v. Austria [GC], no 57813\/00, ECHR 2011;Scozzari and Giunta v. Italy [GC], nos. 39221\/98 and 41963\/98, \u00a7\u00a7 148-151, ECHR 2000 VIII;Wagner and J.M.W.L. v. Luxembourg, no 76240\/01, \u00a7 117, 28 June 2007;X v. Latvia [GC], no 27853\/09, \u00a7 107, ECHR 2013;X and Y v. the Netherlands, 26 March 1985, \u00a7 22, Series A no 91;X, Y and Z v. the United Kingdom, 22 April 1997, \u00a7 36, Reports 1997 II;X. v. Switzerland, no 8257\/78, decision of the Commission of 10 July 1978, Decisions and Reports 5;Y.C. v. the United Kingdom, no 4547\/10, \u00a7\u00a7 133-138, 13 March 2012;Zhou v. Italy, no 33773\/11, \u00a7 55, 21 January 2014", "external_sources": "Article 5 of the Hague Convention Abolishing the Requirement of Legalisation for Foreign Public Documents of 5 October 1961;Article 3 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child of 20 November 1989;(Russia) Article 51 \u00a7 4 of the Family Code;(Russia) Basic Law on the Protection of Citizens\u2019 Health, enacted on 21 November 2011 and entered into force on 1 January 2012\n", "conclusion": "Remainder inadmissible;No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Andr\u00e1s Saj\u00f3;Andr\u00e9 Potocki;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Dmitry Dedov;Egidijus K\u016bris;Guido Raimondi;Helen Keller;Helena J\u00e4derblom;Julia Laffranque;Khanlar Hajiyev;Ledi Bianku;Luis L\u00f3pez Guerra;Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska;Neboj\u0161a Vu\u010dini\u0107;Paul Lemmens;Paulo Pinto De Albuquerque;Robert Spano;S\u00edofra O'Leary;Vincent A. De Gaetano;Yonko Grozev", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0124JUD002535812" }, "233": { "webcast_id": "2535812_09122015", "hearing_date": "2015-12-09 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Paradiso and Campanelli v. Italy (no. 25358\/12)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "25358\/12", "case_id": "001-151056", "case_name": "CASE OF PARADISO AND CAMPANELLI v. ITALY", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-151056", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2015-01-27 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 2, "court": "5", "issue": "", "represented_by": "SVITNEV K.", "respondent": "ITA", "articles": "8;8-1;8-2;35;35-3;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Abdulaziz, Cabales and Balkandali v. the United Kingdom, 28 May 1985, \u00a7 62, Series A no 94;Akdivar and Others v. Turkey, 16 September 1996, \u00a7\u00a7 65-69, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 IV;E.B. v. France [GC], no 43546\/02, \u00a7 41, 22 January 2008;Gaskin v. the United Kingdom, 7 July 1989, \u00a7 39, Series A no 160;Gnahor\u00e9 v. France, no 40031\/98, \u00a7 50, ECHR 2000 IX;Havelka and Others v. the Czech Republic, no 23499\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 34-35, 21 June 2007;Johnston and Others v. Ireland, 18 December 1986, \u00a7 55, Series A no 112;K. and T. v. Finland [GC], no 25702\/94, ECHR 2001 VII;Keegan v. Ireland, 26 May 1994, \u00a7\u00a7 44-45, Series A no 290;Kroon and Others v. the Netherlands, 27 October 1994, \u00a7 30, Series A no 297-C;Kutzner v. Germany, no 46544\/99, \u00a7 56, ECHR 2002-I;Labassee v. France, no 65941\/11, \u00a7 60, 26 June 2014;Marckx v. Belgium, 13 June 1979, \u00a7 31, S\u00e9rie A no 31;Mennesson v. France, no 65192\/11, \u00a7 81, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Mikuli\u0107 v. Croatia, no 53176\/99, ECHR 2002 I;Moretti and Benedetti v. Italy, no 16318\/07, 27 April 2010;Nada v. Switzerland [GC], no 10593\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 168-169, ECHR 2012;Neulinger and Shuruk v. Switzerland [GC], no 41615\/07, \u00a7 136, ECHR 2010;Niemietz v. Germany, 16 December 1992, \u00a7 29, Series A no 251-B;Nylund v. Finland (dec.), no 27110\/95, ECHR 1999-VI;Pini and Others v. Romania, nos. 78028\/01 and 78030\/01, \u00a7 148, ECHR 2004-V;Pontes v. Portugal, no 19554\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 74-80, 10 April 2012;Pontes v. Portugal, no 19554\/09, \u00a7 74, 10 April 2012;S.D., D.P., and T. v. the United Kingdom, no 23714\/94, decision of the Commission of 20 May 1996;Scordino v. Italy (dec.), no 36813\/97, ECHR 2003 IV;Scozzari and Giunta v. Italy [GC], nos. 39221\/98 and 41963\/98, \u00a7 148, ECHR 2000 VIII;Wagner and J.M.W.L. v. Luxembourg, no 76240\/01, 28 June 2007;Wallov\u00e1 and Walla v. the Czech Republic, no 23848\/04, \u00a7 47, 26 October 2006;X, Y and Z v. the United Kingdom, 22 April 1997, \u00a7 36, Reports 1997 II;Y.C. v. the United Kingdom, no 4547\/10, \u00a7\u00a7 133-138, 13 March 2012;Zhou v. Italy, no 33773\/11, \u00a7\u00a7 55-56, 21 January 2014", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Preliminary objection allowed (Article 35-3 - Ratione personae);Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for family life;Respect for private life);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Andr\u00e1s Saj\u00f3;Egidijus K\u016bris;Guido Raimondi;Helen Keller;Neboj\u0161a Vu\u010dini\u0107;Robert Spano", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0127JUD002535812" }, "234": { "webcast_id": "2885911_02122015", "hearing_date": "2015-12-02 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Dubsk\u00e1 and Krejzov\u00e1 v. the Czech Republic (nos. 28859\/11 and 28473\/12)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "28859\/11", "case_id": "001-168066", "case_name": "CASE OF DUBSK\u00c1 AND KREJZOV\u00c1 v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-168066", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2016-11-15 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Health Care in Private Health-Care Institutions Act ; Decree no. 424\/2004 of the Ministry of Health ; Decree no. 55\/2011 of the Ministry of Health ; Decree no. 221\/2010 of the Ministry of Health ; Decree no. 92\/2012 of the Ministry of Health", "represented_by": "ZAHUMENSKY D. ; HOREJSI R.", "respondent": "CZE", "articles": "8;8-1;8-2", "strasbourg_caselaw": "A, B and C v. Ireland [GC], no. 25579\/05, ECHR 2010;Fern\u00e1ndez Martinez v. Spain [GC], no. 56030\/07, \u00a7 124, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Hristozov and Others v. Bulgaria, nos. 47039\/11 and 358\/12, ECHR 2012 (extracts);Maurice v. France [GC], no. 11810\/03, ECHR 2005-IX;Odi\u00e8vre v. France [GC], no. 42326\/98, \u00a7 29, ECHR 2003-III;Parrillo v. Italy [GC], no. 46470\/11, ECHR 2015;S. and Marper v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 30562\/04 and 30566\/04, \u00a7 101, ECHR 2008;S.H. and Others v. Austria [GC], no. 57813\/00, ECHR 2011;Shelley v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 23800\/06, 4 January 2008;Stec and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 65731\/01 and 65900\/01, ECHR 2006-VI;Ternovszky v. Hungary, no. 67545\/09, 14 December 2010;Van Der Heijden v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 42857\/05, \u00a7 56, 3 April 2012", "external_sources": "Concluding Observations of the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women on the Czech Republic of 22 October 2010 (CEDAW\/C\/CZE\/CO\/5)", "conclusion": "No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Ale\u0161 Pejchal;Andr\u00e1s Saj\u00f3;Andr\u00e9 Potocki;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Dmitry Dedov;Egidijus K\u016bris;Ganna Yudkivska;George Nicolaou;Guido Raimondi;Helen Keller;Helena J\u00e4derblom;Jon Fridrik Kj\u00f8lbro;Julia Laffranque;Kristina Pardalos;Luis L\u00f3pez Guerra;Mark Villiger;Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska;Paul Lemmens;S\u00edofra O'Leary", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1115JUD002885911" }, "235": { "webcast_id": "2885911_02122015", "hearing_date": "2015-12-02 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Dubsk\u00e1 and Krejzov\u00e1 v. the Czech Republic (nos. 28859\/11 and 28473\/12)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "28859\/11", "case_id": "001-148632", "case_name": "CASE OF DUBSK\u00c1 AND KREJZOV\u00c1 v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-148632", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2014-12-11 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 2, "court": "23", "issue": "Medical Services Act", "represented_by": "ZAHUMENSKY D. ; HOREJSI R.", "respondent": "CZE", "articles": "8;8-1;8-2;35", "strasbourg_caselaw": "A, B and C v. Ireland [GC], no. 25579\/05, 16 December 2010;Connors v. the United Kingdom, no. 66746\/01, \u00a7 82, 27 May 2004;Dickson v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 44362\/04, \u00a7 66, ECHR 2007-V;Evans v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 6339\/05, \u00a7 71, ECHR 2007 I;Haas v. Switzerland, no. 31322\/07, \u00a7 50, 20 January 2011;Haase v. Germany, no. 11057\/02, \u00a7 93, ECHR 2004 III (extracts);Odi\u00e8vre v. France, [GC], no. 42326\/98, \u00a7 29, ECHR 2003 III;Pretty v. the United Kingdom, no. 2346\/02, \u00a7 61, ECHR 2002 III;Stubing v. Germany, no. 43547\/08, \u00a7 60, 12 April 2012;Tysi\u0105c v. Poland, no. 5410\/03, \u00a7 107, ECHR 2007 I", "external_sources": "Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women\u2019s Concluding Observations on the Czech Republic of 22 October 2010 (CEDAW\/C\/CZE\/CO\/5)", "conclusion": "No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Ale\u0161 Pejchal;Andr\u00e9 Potocki;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Ganna Yudkivska;Mark Villiger;Paul Lemmens", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1211JUD002885911" }, "236": { "webcast_id": "2885911_02122015", "hearing_date": "2015-12-02 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Dubsk\u00e1 and Krejzov\u00e1 v. the Czech Republic (nos. 28859\/11 and 28473\/12)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "28859\/11", "case_id": "001-113345", "case_name": "DUBSK\u00c1 v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-113345", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "2012-09-03 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "ZAHUMENSKY D.", "respondent": "CZE", "articles": "8;8-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Communicated", "separate_opinion": "FALSE", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "237": { "webcast_id": "2885911_02122015", "hearing_date": "2015-12-02 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Dubsk\u00e1 and Krejzov\u00e1 v. the Czech Republic (nos. 28859\/11 and 28473\/12)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "28473\/12", "case_id": "001-168066", "case_name": "CASE OF DUBSK\u00c1 AND KREJZOV\u00c1 v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-168066", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2016-11-15 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Health Care in Private Health-Care Institutions Act ; Decree no. 424\/2004 of the Ministry of Health ; Decree no. 55\/2011 of the Ministry of Health ; Decree no. 221\/2010 of the Ministry of Health ; Decree no. 92\/2012 of the Ministry of Health", "represented_by": "ZAHUMENSKY D. ; HOREJSI R.", "respondent": "CZE", "articles": "8;8-1;8-2", "strasbourg_caselaw": "A, B and C v. Ireland [GC], no. 25579\/05, ECHR 2010;Fern\u00e1ndez Martinez v. Spain [GC], no. 56030\/07, \u00a7 124, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Hristozov and Others v. Bulgaria, nos. 47039\/11 and 358\/12, ECHR 2012 (extracts);Maurice v. France [GC], no. 11810\/03, ECHR 2005-IX;Odi\u00e8vre v. France [GC], no. 42326\/98, \u00a7 29, ECHR 2003-III;Parrillo v. Italy [GC], no. 46470\/11, ECHR 2015;S. and Marper v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 30562\/04 and 30566\/04, \u00a7 101, ECHR 2008;S.H. and Others v. Austria [GC], no. 57813\/00, ECHR 2011;Shelley v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 23800\/06, 4 January 2008;Stec and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 65731\/01 and 65900\/01, ECHR 2006-VI;Ternovszky v. Hungary, no. 67545\/09, 14 December 2010;Van Der Heijden v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 42857\/05, \u00a7 56, 3 April 2012", "external_sources": "Concluding Observations of the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women on the Czech Republic of 22 October 2010 (CEDAW\/C\/CZE\/CO\/5)", "conclusion": "No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Ale\u0161 Pejchal;Andr\u00e1s Saj\u00f3;Andr\u00e9 Potocki;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Dmitry Dedov;Egidijus K\u016bris;Ganna Yudkivska;George Nicolaou;Guido Raimondi;Helen Keller;Helena J\u00e4derblom;Jon Fridrik Kj\u00f8lbro;Julia Laffranque;Kristina Pardalos;Luis L\u00f3pez Guerra;Mark Villiger;Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska;Paul Lemmens;S\u00edofra O'Leary", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1115JUD002885911" }, "238": { "webcast_id": "2885911_02122015", "hearing_date": "2015-12-02 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Dubsk\u00e1 and Krejzov\u00e1 v. the Czech Republic (nos. 28859\/11 and 28473\/12)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "28473\/12", "case_id": "001-148632", "case_name": "CASE OF DUBSK\u00c1 AND KREJZOV\u00c1 v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-148632", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2014-12-11 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 2, "court": "23", "issue": "Medical Services Act", "represented_by": "ZAHUMENSKY D. ; HOREJSI R.", "respondent": "CZE", "articles": "8;8-1;8-2;35", "strasbourg_caselaw": "A, B and C v. Ireland [GC], no. 25579\/05, 16 December 2010;Connors v. the United Kingdom, no. 66746\/01, \u00a7 82, 27 May 2004;Dickson v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 44362\/04, \u00a7 66, ECHR 2007-V;Evans v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 6339\/05, \u00a7 71, ECHR 2007 I;Haas v. Switzerland, no. 31322\/07, \u00a7 50, 20 January 2011;Haase v. Germany, no. 11057\/02, \u00a7 93, ECHR 2004 III (extracts);Odi\u00e8vre v. France, [GC], no. 42326\/98, \u00a7 29, ECHR 2003 III;Pretty v. the United Kingdom, no. 2346\/02, \u00a7 61, ECHR 2002 III;Stubing v. Germany, no. 43547\/08, \u00a7 60, 12 April 2012;Tysi\u0105c v. Poland, no. 5410\/03, \u00a7 107, ECHR 2007 I", "external_sources": "Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women\u2019s Concluding Observations on the Czech Republic of 22 October 2010 (CEDAW\/C\/CZE\/CO\/5)", "conclusion": "No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Ale\u0161 Pejchal;Andr\u00e9 Potocki;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Ganna Yudkivska;Mark Villiger;Paul Lemmens", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1211JUD002885911" }, "239": { "webcast_id": "2885911_02122015", "hearing_date": "2015-12-02 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Dubsk\u00e1 and Krejzov\u00e1 v. the Czech Republic (nos. 28859\/11 and 28473\/12)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "28473\/12", "case_id": "001-113346", "case_name": "KREJZOV\u00c1 v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-113346", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "2012-09-03 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "HOREJSI R.", "respondent": "CZE", "articles": "8;8-1;14", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Communicated", "separate_opinion": "FALSE", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "240": { "webcast_id": "5054108_25112015", "hearing_date": "2015-11-25 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Ibrahim and Others v. the United Kingdom (nos. 50541\/08, 50571\/08, 50573\/08 and 40351\/09)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "50541\/08", "case_id": "001-166680", "case_name": "CASE OF IBRAHIM AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-166680", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2016-09-13 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Sections 76 \u00a7 1 and 78 \u00a7 1 of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984\n", "represented_by": "IRVINE THANVI NATAS ; BENNATHAN J. ; ARANI SOLICITORS ; VULLO S. ; KING J. ; FAUL A. ", "respondent": "GBR", "articles": "6;6+6-3-c;6-1;6-3;6-3-c;35;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "A. and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 3455\/05, ECHR 2009;Aleksandr Zaichenko v. Russia, no. 39660\/02, 18 February 2010;Allan v. the United Kingdom, no. 48539\/99, ECHR 2002 IX;Brennan v. the United Kingdom, no. 39846\/98, \u00a7 45, ECHR 2001 X;Brusco v. France, no. 1466\/07, 14 October 2010;Bykov v. Russia [GC], no. 4378\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 89-93, 10 March 2009;Dayanan v. Turkey, no. 7377\/03, 13 October 2009;Deweer v. Belgium, 27 February 1980, \u00a7\u00a7 42-46, Series A no. 35;Dvorski v. Croatia [GC], no. 25703\/11, ECHR 2015;Eckle v. Germany, 15 July 1982, \u00a7 73, Series A no. 51;G\u00e4fgen v. Germany [GC], no. 22978\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 166-169, ECHR 2010;Heaney and McGuinness v. Ireland, no. 34720\/97, \u00a7\u00a7 47-55, ECHR 2000-XII;Imbrioscia v. Switzerland, 24 November 1993, \u00a7\u00a7 36-38, Series A no. 275;Jalloh v. Germany [GC], no. 54810\/00, \u00a7\u00a7 97-100, ECHR 2006 IX;John Murray v. the United Kingdom, 8 February 1996, \u00a7\u00a7 45-49, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 I;Mayzit v. Russia, no. 63378\/00, \u00a7 77, 20 January 2005;McFarlane v. Ireland [GC], no. 31333\/06, \u00a7 143, 10 September 2010;Nada v. Switzerland [GC], no. 10593\/08, ECHR 2012;Nechiporuk and Yonkalo v. Ukraine, no. 42310\/04, \u00a7 262, 21 April 2011;O\u2019Halloran and Francis v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 15809\/02 and 25624\/02, \u00a7 53, ECHR 2007 III;O\u2019Kane v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 30550\/96, 6 July 1999;Pishchalnikov v. Russia, no. 7025\/04, 24 September 2009;P\u0142onka v. Poland, no. 20310\/02, 31 March 2009;Saadi v. Italy [GC], no. 37201\/06, ECHR 2008;Salduz v. Turkey [GC], no. 36391\/02, ECHR 2008;Saunders v. the United Kingdom, 17 December 1996, \u00a7\u00a7 68-69, Reports 1996 VI;Schatschaschwili v. Germany [GC], no. 9154\/10, \u00a7\u00a7 100-101, ECHR 2015;Schmid-Laffer v. Switzerland, no. 41269\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 29 and 39, 16 June 2015;Seleznev v. Russia, no. 15591\/03, \u00a7 67, 26 June 2008;Shabelnik v. Ukraine, no. 16404\/03, \u00a7 52, 19 February 2009;Sher and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 5201\/11, \u00a7 149, ECHR 2015 (extracts);Taxquet v. Belgium [GC], no. 926\/05, \u00a7 84, ECHR 2010;Weh v. Austria, no. 38544\/97, 8 April 2004", "external_sources": "Preamble and Article 3 of Directive 2012\/13\/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2012 on the right to information in criminal proceedings;Article 21 of the Preamble of Directive 2013\/48\/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council, adopted on 22 October 2013, covering the right of access to a lawyer in criminal proceedings and in European arrest warrant proceedings, the right to have third parties informed of detention and the right to communicate with third parties and with consular authorities;Article 14 of International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights;Article 55 of the Statute of the International Criminal Court;Rule 42 of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia;Rule 42 of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda;Canadian Charter of rights and freedoms;Fifth and Sixth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America\n", "conclusion": "Remainder inadmissible;No violation of Article 6+6-3-c - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing;Article 6-3 - Rights of defence) (Article 6-3-c - Defence through legal assistance;Article 6 - Right to a fair trial);Violation of Article 6+6-3-c - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Criminal charge;Fair hearing) (Article 6-3-c - Defence through legal assistance;Article 6-3 - Rights of defence;Article 6 - Right to a fair trial);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Non-pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Andr\u00e1s Saj\u00f3;Dmitry Dedov;Ganna Yudkivska;George Nicolaou;Guido Raimondi;Ineta Ziemele;Iulia Motoc;Johannes Silvis;Julia Laffranque;Khanlar Hajiyev;Krzysztof Wojtyczek;Ledi Bianku;Luis L\u00f3pez Guerra;Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska;Nona Tsotsoria;P\u00e4ivi Hirvel\u00e4;Paul Lemmens;Paul Mahoney;Robert Spano;S\u00edofra O'Leary;Vincent A. De Gaetano;Zdravka Kalaydjieva", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0913JUD005054108" }, "241": { "webcast_id": "5054108_25112015", "hearing_date": "2015-11-25 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Ibrahim and Others v. the United Kingdom (nos. 50541\/08, 50571\/08, 50573\/08 and 40351\/09)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "50541\/08", "case_id": "001-148676", "case_name": "CASE OF IBRAHIM AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-148676", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 14, "document_date": "2014-12-16 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 3, "court": "7", "issue": "Paragraph 8 of Schedule 8 of the Terrorism Act 2000 ; Paragraph 6.7 of Code C ; Sections 76 and 78 PACE\n", "represented_by": "IRVINE THANVI NATAS SOLICITORS ; BENNATHAN J. ; KING J. ; FAUL A.", "respondent": "GBR", "articles": "6;6+6-3-c;6-1;6-3;6-3-c", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Aleksandr Zaichenko v. Russia, no. 39660\/02, 18 February 2010;Bandaletov v. Ukraine, no. 23180\/06, 31 October 2013;Beggs v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 15499\/10, \u00a7 124, 16 October 2012;Brennan v. the United Kingdom, no. 39846\/98, \u00a7 45, ECHR 2001 X;Bykov v. Russia [GC], no. 4378\/02, \u00a7 90, 10 March 2009;\u00c7imen v. Turkey, no. 19582\/02, \u00a7 26, 3 February 2009;Dayanan v. Turkey, no. 7377\/03, \u00a7 33, 13 October 2009;G\u00e4fgen v. Germany [GC], no. 22978\/05, ECHR 2010;Imbrioscia v. Switzerland, 24 November 1993, \u00a7\u00a7 37-38, Series A no. 275;John Murray v. the United Kingdom, 8 February 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 I;Lutsenko v. Ukraine, no. 30663\/04, \u00a7 42, 18 December 2008;Magee v. the United Kingdom, no. 28135\/95, \u00a7 41, ECHR 2000 VI;Mayzit v. Russia, no. 63378\/00, \u00a7 77, 20 January 2005;Mustafa (Abu Hamza) v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 31411\/07, \u00a7 40, 18 January 2011;Panovits v. Cyprus, no. 4268\/04, \u00a7\u00a7 81-82, 11 December 2008;Pishchalnikov v. Russia, no. 7025\/04, 24 September 2009;Sakhnovskiy v. Russia [GC], no. 21272\/03, \u00a7 94, 2 November 2010;Salduz v. Turkey [GC], no. 36391\/02, ECHR 2008;\u015eedal v. Turkey (dec.), no. 38802\/08, \u00a7 33, 13 May 2014;Seleznev v. Russia, no. 15591\/03, \u00a7 67, 26 June 2008;Taxquet v. Belgium [GC], no. 926\/05, \u00a7 84, 16 November 2010;Titarenko v. Ukraine, no. 31720\/02, \u00a7 87, 20 September 2012;Yolda\u015f v. Turkey, no. 27503\/04, 23 February 2010", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "No violation of Article 6+6-3-c - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing) (Article 6 - Right to a fair trial;Article 6-3 - Rights of defence;Article 6-3-c - Defence through legal assistance);No violation of Article 6+6-3-c - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing) (Article 6 - Right to a fair trial;Article 6-3 - Rights of defence;Article 6-3-c - Defence through legal assistance)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "George Nicolaou;Ineta Ziemele;Krzysztof Wojtyczek;Ledi Bianku;P\u00e4ivi Hirvel\u00e4;Paul Mahoney;Zdravka Kalaydjieva", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1216JUD005054108" }, "242": { "webcast_id": "5054108_25112015", "hearing_date": "2015-11-25 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Ibrahim and Others v. the United Kingdom (nos. 50541\/08, 50571\/08, 50573\/08 and 40351\/09)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "50541\/08", "case_id": "001-111742", "case_name": "IBRAHIM v. THE UNITED KINGDOM and 2 other applications", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-111742", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "2012-05-22 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "IRVINE THANVI NATAS SOLICITORS", "respondent": "GBR", "articles": "6;6-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "", "separate_opinion": "FALSE", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "243": { "webcast_id": "5054108_25112015", "hearing_date": "2015-11-25 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Ibrahim and Others v. the United Kingdom (nos. 50541\/08, 50571\/08, 50573\/08 and 40351\/09)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "50541\/08", "case_id": "001-111388", "case_name": "IBRAHIM v. THE UNITED KINGDOM AND OTHER APPLICATIONS", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-111388", "type": "DECISIONS", "typedescription": 9, "document_date": "", "collection": "CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "7", "issue": "", "represented_by": "IRVINE THANVI NATAS SOLICITORS ; ARANI SOLICITORS", "respondent": "GBR", "articles": "6;6-1;6-3-c;6-3-d;35", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Partly inadmissible", "separate_opinion": "", "judges": "George Nicolaou;Lech Garlicki;Ledi Bianku;Neboj\u0161a Vu\u010dini\u0107;Nicolas Bratza;Vincent A. De Gaetano;Zdravka Kalaydjieva", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0522DEC005054108" }, "244": { "webcast_id": "5054108_25112015", "hearing_date": "2015-11-25 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Ibrahim and Others v. the United Kingdom (nos. 50541\/08, 50571\/08, 50573\/08 and 40351\/09)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "50571\/08", "case_id": "001-166680", "case_name": "CASE OF IBRAHIM AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-166680", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2016-09-13 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Sections 76 \u00a7 1 and 78 \u00a7 1 of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984\n", "represented_by": "IRVINE THANVI NATAS ; BENNATHAN J. ; ARANI SOLICITORS ; VULLO S. ; KING J. ; FAUL A. ", "respondent": "GBR", "articles": "6;6+6-3-c;6-1;6-3;6-3-c;35;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "A. and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 3455\/05, ECHR 2009;Aleksandr Zaichenko v. Russia, no. 39660\/02, 18 February 2010;Allan v. the United Kingdom, no. 48539\/99, ECHR 2002 IX;Brennan v. the United Kingdom, no. 39846\/98, \u00a7 45, ECHR 2001 X;Brusco v. France, no. 1466\/07, 14 October 2010;Bykov v. Russia [GC], no. 4378\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 89-93, 10 March 2009;Dayanan v. Turkey, no. 7377\/03, 13 October 2009;Deweer v. Belgium, 27 February 1980, \u00a7\u00a7 42-46, Series A no. 35;Dvorski v. Croatia [GC], no. 25703\/11, ECHR 2015;Eckle v. Germany, 15 July 1982, \u00a7 73, Series A no. 51;G\u00e4fgen v. Germany [GC], no. 22978\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 166-169, ECHR 2010;Heaney and McGuinness v. Ireland, no. 34720\/97, \u00a7\u00a7 47-55, ECHR 2000-XII;Imbrioscia v. Switzerland, 24 November 1993, \u00a7\u00a7 36-38, Series A no. 275;Jalloh v. Germany [GC], no. 54810\/00, \u00a7\u00a7 97-100, ECHR 2006 IX;John Murray v. the United Kingdom, 8 February 1996, \u00a7\u00a7 45-49, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 I;Mayzit v. Russia, no. 63378\/00, \u00a7 77, 20 January 2005;McFarlane v. Ireland [GC], no. 31333\/06, \u00a7 143, 10 September 2010;Nada v. Switzerland [GC], no. 10593\/08, ECHR 2012;Nechiporuk and Yonkalo v. Ukraine, no. 42310\/04, \u00a7 262, 21 April 2011;O\u2019Halloran and Francis v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 15809\/02 and 25624\/02, \u00a7 53, ECHR 2007 III;O\u2019Kane v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 30550\/96, 6 July 1999;Pishchalnikov v. Russia, no. 7025\/04, 24 September 2009;P\u0142onka v. Poland, no. 20310\/02, 31 March 2009;Saadi v. Italy [GC], no. 37201\/06, ECHR 2008;Salduz v. Turkey [GC], no. 36391\/02, ECHR 2008;Saunders v. the United Kingdom, 17 December 1996, \u00a7\u00a7 68-69, Reports 1996 VI;Schatschaschwili v. Germany [GC], no. 9154\/10, \u00a7\u00a7 100-101, ECHR 2015;Schmid-Laffer v. Switzerland, no. 41269\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 29 and 39, 16 June 2015;Seleznev v. Russia, no. 15591\/03, \u00a7 67, 26 June 2008;Shabelnik v. Ukraine, no. 16404\/03, \u00a7 52, 19 February 2009;Sher and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 5201\/11, \u00a7 149, ECHR 2015 (extracts);Taxquet v. Belgium [GC], no. 926\/05, \u00a7 84, ECHR 2010;Weh v. Austria, no. 38544\/97, 8 April 2004", "external_sources": "Preamble and Article 3 of Directive 2012\/13\/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2012 on the right to information in criminal proceedings;Article 21 of the Preamble of Directive 2013\/48\/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council, adopted on 22 October 2013, covering the right of access to a lawyer in criminal proceedings and in European arrest warrant proceedings, the right to have third parties informed of detention and the right to communicate with third parties and with consular authorities;Article 14 of International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights;Article 55 of the Statute of the International Criminal Court;Rule 42 of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia;Rule 42 of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda;Canadian Charter of rights and freedoms;Fifth and Sixth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America\n", "conclusion": "Remainder inadmissible;No violation of Article 6+6-3-c - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing;Article 6-3 - Rights of defence) (Article 6-3-c - Defence through legal assistance;Article 6 - Right to a fair trial);Violation of Article 6+6-3-c - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Criminal charge;Fair hearing) (Article 6-3-c - Defence through legal assistance;Article 6-3 - Rights of defence;Article 6 - Right to a fair trial);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Non-pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Andr\u00e1s Saj\u00f3;Dmitry Dedov;Ganna Yudkivska;George Nicolaou;Guido Raimondi;Ineta Ziemele;Iulia Motoc;Johannes Silvis;Julia Laffranque;Khanlar Hajiyev;Krzysztof Wojtyczek;Ledi Bianku;Luis L\u00f3pez Guerra;Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska;Nona Tsotsoria;P\u00e4ivi Hirvel\u00e4;Paul Lemmens;Paul Mahoney;Robert Spano;S\u00edofra O'Leary;Vincent A. De Gaetano;Zdravka Kalaydjieva", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0913JUD005054108" }, "245": { "webcast_id": "5054108_25112015", "hearing_date": "2015-11-25 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Ibrahim and Others v. the United Kingdom (nos. 50541\/08, 50571\/08, 50573\/08 and 40351\/09)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "50571\/08", "case_id": "001-148676", "case_name": "CASE OF IBRAHIM AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-148676", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 14, "document_date": "2014-12-16 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 3, "court": "7", "issue": "Paragraph 8 of Schedule 8 of the Terrorism Act 2000 ; Paragraph 6.7 of Code C ; Sections 76 and 78 PACE\n", "represented_by": "IRVINE THANVI NATAS SOLICITORS ; BENNATHAN J. ; KING J. ; FAUL A.", "respondent": "GBR", "articles": "6;6+6-3-c;6-1;6-3;6-3-c", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Aleksandr Zaichenko v. Russia, no. 39660\/02, 18 February 2010;Bandaletov v. Ukraine, no. 23180\/06, 31 October 2013;Beggs v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 15499\/10, \u00a7 124, 16 October 2012;Brennan v. the United Kingdom, no. 39846\/98, \u00a7 45, ECHR 2001 X;Bykov v. Russia [GC], no. 4378\/02, \u00a7 90, 10 March 2009;\u00c7imen v. Turkey, no. 19582\/02, \u00a7 26, 3 February 2009;Dayanan v. Turkey, no. 7377\/03, \u00a7 33, 13 October 2009;G\u00e4fgen v. Germany [GC], no. 22978\/05, ECHR 2010;Imbrioscia v. Switzerland, 24 November 1993, \u00a7\u00a7 37-38, Series A no. 275;John Murray v. the United Kingdom, 8 February 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 I;Lutsenko v. Ukraine, no. 30663\/04, \u00a7 42, 18 December 2008;Magee v. the United Kingdom, no. 28135\/95, \u00a7 41, ECHR 2000 VI;Mayzit v. Russia, no. 63378\/00, \u00a7 77, 20 January 2005;Mustafa (Abu Hamza) v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 31411\/07, \u00a7 40, 18 January 2011;Panovits v. Cyprus, no. 4268\/04, \u00a7\u00a7 81-82, 11 December 2008;Pishchalnikov v. Russia, no. 7025\/04, 24 September 2009;Sakhnovskiy v. Russia [GC], no. 21272\/03, \u00a7 94, 2 November 2010;Salduz v. Turkey [GC], no. 36391\/02, ECHR 2008;\u015eedal v. Turkey (dec.), no. 38802\/08, \u00a7 33, 13 May 2014;Seleznev v. Russia, no. 15591\/03, \u00a7 67, 26 June 2008;Taxquet v. Belgium [GC], no. 926\/05, \u00a7 84, 16 November 2010;Titarenko v. Ukraine, no. 31720\/02, \u00a7 87, 20 September 2012;Yolda\u015f v. Turkey, no. 27503\/04, 23 February 2010", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "No violation of Article 6+6-3-c - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing) (Article 6 - Right to a fair trial;Article 6-3 - Rights of defence;Article 6-3-c - Defence through legal assistance);No violation of Article 6+6-3-c - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing) (Article 6 - Right to a fair trial;Article 6-3 - Rights of defence;Article 6-3-c - Defence through legal assistance)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "George Nicolaou;Ineta Ziemele;Krzysztof Wojtyczek;Ledi Bianku;P\u00e4ivi Hirvel\u00e4;Paul Mahoney;Zdravka Kalaydjieva", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1216JUD005054108" }, "246": { "webcast_id": "5054108_25112015", "hearing_date": "2015-11-25 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Ibrahim and Others v. the United Kingdom (nos. 50541\/08, 50571\/08, 50573\/08 and 40351\/09)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "50571\/08", "case_id": "001-111742", "case_name": "IBRAHIM v. THE UNITED KINGDOM and 2 other applications", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-111742", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "2012-05-22 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "IRVINE THANVI NATAS SOLICITORS", "respondent": "GBR", "articles": "6;6-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "", "separate_opinion": "FALSE", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "247": { "webcast_id": "5054108_25112015", "hearing_date": "2015-11-25 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Ibrahim and Others v. the United Kingdom (nos. 50541\/08, 50571\/08, 50573\/08 and 40351\/09)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "50571\/08", "case_id": "001-111388", "case_name": "IBRAHIM v. THE UNITED KINGDOM AND OTHER APPLICATIONS", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-111388", "type": "DECISIONS", "typedescription": 9, "document_date": "", "collection": "CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "7", "issue": "", "represented_by": "IRVINE THANVI NATAS SOLICITORS ; ARANI SOLICITORS", "respondent": "GBR", "articles": "6;6-1;6-3-c;6-3-d;35", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Partly inadmissible", "separate_opinion": "", "judges": "George Nicolaou;Lech Garlicki;Ledi Bianku;Neboj\u0161a Vu\u010dini\u0107;Nicolas Bratza;Vincent A. De Gaetano;Zdravka Kalaydjieva", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0522DEC005054108" }, "248": { "webcast_id": "5054108_25112015", "hearing_date": "2015-11-25 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Ibrahim and Others v. the United Kingdom (nos. 50541\/08, 50571\/08, 50573\/08 and 40351\/09)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "50573\/08", "case_id": "001-166680", "case_name": "CASE OF IBRAHIM AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-166680", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2016-09-13 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Sections 76 \u00a7 1 and 78 \u00a7 1 of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984\n", "represented_by": "IRVINE THANVI NATAS ; BENNATHAN J. ; ARANI SOLICITORS ; VULLO S. ; KING J. ; FAUL A. ", "respondent": "GBR", "articles": "6;6+6-3-c;6-1;6-3;6-3-c;35;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "A. and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 3455\/05, ECHR 2009;Aleksandr Zaichenko v. Russia, no. 39660\/02, 18 February 2010;Allan v. the United Kingdom, no. 48539\/99, ECHR 2002 IX;Brennan v. the United Kingdom, no. 39846\/98, \u00a7 45, ECHR 2001 X;Brusco v. France, no. 1466\/07, 14 October 2010;Bykov v. Russia [GC], no. 4378\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 89-93, 10 March 2009;Dayanan v. Turkey, no. 7377\/03, 13 October 2009;Deweer v. Belgium, 27 February 1980, \u00a7\u00a7 42-46, Series A no. 35;Dvorski v. Croatia [GC], no. 25703\/11, ECHR 2015;Eckle v. Germany, 15 July 1982, \u00a7 73, Series A no. 51;G\u00e4fgen v. Germany [GC], no. 22978\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 166-169, ECHR 2010;Heaney and McGuinness v. Ireland, no. 34720\/97, \u00a7\u00a7 47-55, ECHR 2000-XII;Imbrioscia v. Switzerland, 24 November 1993, \u00a7\u00a7 36-38, Series A no. 275;Jalloh v. Germany [GC], no. 54810\/00, \u00a7\u00a7 97-100, ECHR 2006 IX;John Murray v. the United Kingdom, 8 February 1996, \u00a7\u00a7 45-49, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 I;Mayzit v. Russia, no. 63378\/00, \u00a7 77, 20 January 2005;McFarlane v. Ireland [GC], no. 31333\/06, \u00a7 143, 10 September 2010;Nada v. Switzerland [GC], no. 10593\/08, ECHR 2012;Nechiporuk and Yonkalo v. Ukraine, no. 42310\/04, \u00a7 262, 21 April 2011;O\u2019Halloran and Francis v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 15809\/02 and 25624\/02, \u00a7 53, ECHR 2007 III;O\u2019Kane v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 30550\/96, 6 July 1999;Pishchalnikov v. Russia, no. 7025\/04, 24 September 2009;P\u0142onka v. Poland, no. 20310\/02, 31 March 2009;Saadi v. Italy [GC], no. 37201\/06, ECHR 2008;Salduz v. Turkey [GC], no. 36391\/02, ECHR 2008;Saunders v. the United Kingdom, 17 December 1996, \u00a7\u00a7 68-69, Reports 1996 VI;Schatschaschwili v. Germany [GC], no. 9154\/10, \u00a7\u00a7 100-101, ECHR 2015;Schmid-Laffer v. Switzerland, no. 41269\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 29 and 39, 16 June 2015;Seleznev v. Russia, no. 15591\/03, \u00a7 67, 26 June 2008;Shabelnik v. Ukraine, no. 16404\/03, \u00a7 52, 19 February 2009;Sher and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 5201\/11, \u00a7 149, ECHR 2015 (extracts);Taxquet v. Belgium [GC], no. 926\/05, \u00a7 84, ECHR 2010;Weh v. Austria, no. 38544\/97, 8 April 2004", "external_sources": "Preamble and Article 3 of Directive 2012\/13\/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2012 on the right to information in criminal proceedings;Article 21 of the Preamble of Directive 2013\/48\/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council, adopted on 22 October 2013, covering the right of access to a lawyer in criminal proceedings and in European arrest warrant proceedings, the right to have third parties informed of detention and the right to communicate with third parties and with consular authorities;Article 14 of International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights;Article 55 of the Statute of the International Criminal Court;Rule 42 of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia;Rule 42 of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda;Canadian Charter of rights and freedoms;Fifth and Sixth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America\n", "conclusion": "Remainder inadmissible;No violation of Article 6+6-3-c - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing;Article 6-3 - Rights of defence) (Article 6-3-c - Defence through legal assistance;Article 6 - Right to a fair trial);Violation of Article 6+6-3-c - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Criminal charge;Fair hearing) (Article 6-3-c - Defence through legal assistance;Article 6-3 - Rights of defence;Article 6 - Right to a fair trial);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Non-pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Andr\u00e1s Saj\u00f3;Dmitry Dedov;Ganna Yudkivska;George Nicolaou;Guido Raimondi;Ineta Ziemele;Iulia Motoc;Johannes Silvis;Julia Laffranque;Khanlar Hajiyev;Krzysztof Wojtyczek;Ledi Bianku;Luis L\u00f3pez Guerra;Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska;Nona Tsotsoria;P\u00e4ivi Hirvel\u00e4;Paul Lemmens;Paul Mahoney;Robert Spano;S\u00edofra O'Leary;Vincent A. De Gaetano;Zdravka Kalaydjieva", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0913JUD005054108" }, "249": { "webcast_id": "5054108_25112015", "hearing_date": "2015-11-25 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Ibrahim and Others v. the United Kingdom (nos. 50541\/08, 50571\/08, 50573\/08 and 40351\/09)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "50573\/08", "case_id": "001-148676", "case_name": "CASE OF IBRAHIM AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-148676", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 14, "document_date": "2014-12-16 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 3, "court": "7", "issue": "Paragraph 8 of Schedule 8 of the Terrorism Act 2000 ; Paragraph 6.7 of Code C ; Sections 76 and 78 PACE\n", "represented_by": "IRVINE THANVI NATAS SOLICITORS ; BENNATHAN J. ; KING J. ; FAUL A.", "respondent": "GBR", "articles": "6;6+6-3-c;6-1;6-3;6-3-c", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Aleksandr Zaichenko v. Russia, no. 39660\/02, 18 February 2010;Bandaletov v. Ukraine, no. 23180\/06, 31 October 2013;Beggs v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 15499\/10, \u00a7 124, 16 October 2012;Brennan v. the United Kingdom, no. 39846\/98, \u00a7 45, ECHR 2001 X;Bykov v. Russia [GC], no. 4378\/02, \u00a7 90, 10 March 2009;\u00c7imen v. Turkey, no. 19582\/02, \u00a7 26, 3 February 2009;Dayanan v. Turkey, no. 7377\/03, \u00a7 33, 13 October 2009;G\u00e4fgen v. Germany [GC], no. 22978\/05, ECHR 2010;Imbrioscia v. Switzerland, 24 November 1993, \u00a7\u00a7 37-38, Series A no. 275;John Murray v. the United Kingdom, 8 February 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 I;Lutsenko v. Ukraine, no. 30663\/04, \u00a7 42, 18 December 2008;Magee v. the United Kingdom, no. 28135\/95, \u00a7 41, ECHR 2000 VI;Mayzit v. Russia, no. 63378\/00, \u00a7 77, 20 January 2005;Mustafa (Abu Hamza) v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 31411\/07, \u00a7 40, 18 January 2011;Panovits v. Cyprus, no. 4268\/04, \u00a7\u00a7 81-82, 11 December 2008;Pishchalnikov v. Russia, no. 7025\/04, 24 September 2009;Sakhnovskiy v. Russia [GC], no. 21272\/03, \u00a7 94, 2 November 2010;Salduz v. Turkey [GC], no. 36391\/02, ECHR 2008;\u015eedal v. Turkey (dec.), no. 38802\/08, \u00a7 33, 13 May 2014;Seleznev v. Russia, no. 15591\/03, \u00a7 67, 26 June 2008;Taxquet v. Belgium [GC], no. 926\/05, \u00a7 84, 16 November 2010;Titarenko v. Ukraine, no. 31720\/02, \u00a7 87, 20 September 2012;Yolda\u015f v. Turkey, no. 27503\/04, 23 February 2010", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "No violation of Article 6+6-3-c - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing) (Article 6 - Right to a fair trial;Article 6-3 - Rights of defence;Article 6-3-c - Defence through legal assistance);No violation of Article 6+6-3-c - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing) (Article 6 - Right to a fair trial;Article 6-3 - Rights of defence;Article 6-3-c - Defence through legal assistance)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "George Nicolaou;Ineta Ziemele;Krzysztof Wojtyczek;Ledi Bianku;P\u00e4ivi Hirvel\u00e4;Paul Mahoney;Zdravka Kalaydjieva", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1216JUD005054108" }, "250": { "webcast_id": "5054108_25112015", "hearing_date": "2015-11-25 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Ibrahim and Others v. the United Kingdom (nos. 50541\/08, 50571\/08, 50573\/08 and 40351\/09)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "50573\/08", "case_id": "001-111742", "case_name": "IBRAHIM v. THE UNITED KINGDOM and 2 other applications", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-111742", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "2012-05-22 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "IRVINE THANVI NATAS SOLICITORS", "respondent": "GBR", "articles": "6;6-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "", "separate_opinion": "FALSE", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "251": { "webcast_id": "5054108_25112015", "hearing_date": "2015-11-25 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Ibrahim and Others v. the United Kingdom (nos. 50541\/08, 50571\/08, 50573\/08 and 40351\/09)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "50573\/08", "case_id": "001-111388", "case_name": "IBRAHIM v. THE UNITED KINGDOM AND OTHER APPLICATIONS", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-111388", "type": "DECISIONS", "typedescription": 9, "document_date": "", "collection": "CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "7", "issue": "", "represented_by": "IRVINE THANVI NATAS SOLICITORS ; ARANI SOLICITORS", "respondent": "GBR", "articles": "6;6-1;6-3-c;6-3-d;35", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Partly inadmissible", "separate_opinion": "", "judges": "George Nicolaou;Lech Garlicki;Ledi Bianku;Neboj\u0161a Vu\u010dini\u0107;Nicolas Bratza;Vincent A. De Gaetano;Zdravka Kalaydjieva", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0522DEC005054108" }, "252": { "webcast_id": "5054108_25112015", "hearing_date": "2015-11-25 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Ibrahim and Others v. the United Kingdom (nos. 50541\/08, 50571\/08, 50573\/08 and 40351\/09)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "40351\/09", "case_id": "001-166680", "case_name": "CASE OF IBRAHIM AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-166680", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2016-09-13 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Sections 76 \u00a7 1 and 78 \u00a7 1 of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984\n", "represented_by": "IRVINE THANVI NATAS ; BENNATHAN J. ; ARANI SOLICITORS ; VULLO S. ; KING J. ; FAUL A. ", "respondent": "GBR", "articles": "6;6+6-3-c;6-1;6-3;6-3-c;35;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "A. and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 3455\/05, ECHR 2009;Aleksandr Zaichenko v. Russia, no. 39660\/02, 18 February 2010;Allan v. the United Kingdom, no. 48539\/99, ECHR 2002 IX;Brennan v. the United Kingdom, no. 39846\/98, \u00a7 45, ECHR 2001 X;Brusco v. France, no. 1466\/07, 14 October 2010;Bykov v. Russia [GC], no. 4378\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 89-93, 10 March 2009;Dayanan v. Turkey, no. 7377\/03, 13 October 2009;Deweer v. Belgium, 27 February 1980, \u00a7\u00a7 42-46, Series A no. 35;Dvorski v. Croatia [GC], no. 25703\/11, ECHR 2015;Eckle v. Germany, 15 July 1982, \u00a7 73, Series A no. 51;G\u00e4fgen v. Germany [GC], no. 22978\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 166-169, ECHR 2010;Heaney and McGuinness v. Ireland, no. 34720\/97, \u00a7\u00a7 47-55, ECHR 2000-XII;Imbrioscia v. Switzerland, 24 November 1993, \u00a7\u00a7 36-38, Series A no. 275;Jalloh v. Germany [GC], no. 54810\/00, \u00a7\u00a7 97-100, ECHR 2006 IX;John Murray v. the United Kingdom, 8 February 1996, \u00a7\u00a7 45-49, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 I;Mayzit v. Russia, no. 63378\/00, \u00a7 77, 20 January 2005;McFarlane v. Ireland [GC], no. 31333\/06, \u00a7 143, 10 September 2010;Nada v. Switzerland [GC], no. 10593\/08, ECHR 2012;Nechiporuk and Yonkalo v. Ukraine, no. 42310\/04, \u00a7 262, 21 April 2011;O\u2019Halloran and Francis v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 15809\/02 and 25624\/02, \u00a7 53, ECHR 2007 III;O\u2019Kane v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 30550\/96, 6 July 1999;Pishchalnikov v. Russia, no. 7025\/04, 24 September 2009;P\u0142onka v. Poland, no. 20310\/02, 31 March 2009;Saadi v. Italy [GC], no. 37201\/06, ECHR 2008;Salduz v. Turkey [GC], no. 36391\/02, ECHR 2008;Saunders v. the United Kingdom, 17 December 1996, \u00a7\u00a7 68-69, Reports 1996 VI;Schatschaschwili v. Germany [GC], no. 9154\/10, \u00a7\u00a7 100-101, ECHR 2015;Schmid-Laffer v. Switzerland, no. 41269\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 29 and 39, 16 June 2015;Seleznev v. Russia, no. 15591\/03, \u00a7 67, 26 June 2008;Shabelnik v. Ukraine, no. 16404\/03, \u00a7 52, 19 February 2009;Sher and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 5201\/11, \u00a7 149, ECHR 2015 (extracts);Taxquet v. Belgium [GC], no. 926\/05, \u00a7 84, ECHR 2010;Weh v. Austria, no. 38544\/97, 8 April 2004", "external_sources": "Preamble and Article 3 of Directive 2012\/13\/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2012 on the right to information in criminal proceedings;Article 21 of the Preamble of Directive 2013\/48\/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council, adopted on 22 October 2013, covering the right of access to a lawyer in criminal proceedings and in European arrest warrant proceedings, the right to have third parties informed of detention and the right to communicate with third parties and with consular authorities;Article 14 of International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights;Article 55 of the Statute of the International Criminal Court;Rule 42 of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia;Rule 42 of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda;Canadian Charter of rights and freedoms;Fifth and Sixth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America\n", "conclusion": "Remainder inadmissible;No violation of Article 6+6-3-c - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing;Article 6-3 - Rights of defence) (Article 6-3-c - Defence through legal assistance;Article 6 - Right to a fair trial);Violation of Article 6+6-3-c - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Criminal charge;Fair hearing) (Article 6-3-c - Defence through legal assistance;Article 6-3 - Rights of defence;Article 6 - Right to a fair trial);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Non-pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Andr\u00e1s Saj\u00f3;Dmitry Dedov;Ganna Yudkivska;George Nicolaou;Guido Raimondi;Ineta Ziemele;Iulia Motoc;Johannes Silvis;Julia Laffranque;Khanlar Hajiyev;Krzysztof Wojtyczek;Ledi Bianku;Luis L\u00f3pez Guerra;Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska;Nona Tsotsoria;P\u00e4ivi Hirvel\u00e4;Paul Lemmens;Paul Mahoney;Robert Spano;S\u00edofra O'Leary;Vincent A. De Gaetano;Zdravka Kalaydjieva", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0913JUD005054108" }, "253": { "webcast_id": "5054108_25112015", "hearing_date": "2015-11-25 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Ibrahim and Others v. the United Kingdom (nos. 50541\/08, 50571\/08, 50573\/08 and 40351\/09)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "40351\/09", "case_id": "001-148676", "case_name": "CASE OF IBRAHIM AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-148676", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 14, "document_date": "2014-12-16 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 3, "court": "7", "issue": "Paragraph 8 of Schedule 8 of the Terrorism Act 2000 ; Paragraph 6.7 of Code C ; Sections 76 and 78 PACE\n", "represented_by": "IRVINE THANVI NATAS SOLICITORS ; BENNATHAN J. ; KING J. ; FAUL A.", "respondent": "GBR", "articles": "6;6+6-3-c;6-1;6-3;6-3-c", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Aleksandr Zaichenko v. Russia, no. 39660\/02, 18 February 2010;Bandaletov v. Ukraine, no. 23180\/06, 31 October 2013;Beggs v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 15499\/10, \u00a7 124, 16 October 2012;Brennan v. the United Kingdom, no. 39846\/98, \u00a7 45, ECHR 2001 X;Bykov v. Russia [GC], no. 4378\/02, \u00a7 90, 10 March 2009;\u00c7imen v. Turkey, no. 19582\/02, \u00a7 26, 3 February 2009;Dayanan v. Turkey, no. 7377\/03, \u00a7 33, 13 October 2009;G\u00e4fgen v. Germany [GC], no. 22978\/05, ECHR 2010;Imbrioscia v. Switzerland, 24 November 1993, \u00a7\u00a7 37-38, Series A no. 275;John Murray v. the United Kingdom, 8 February 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 I;Lutsenko v. Ukraine, no. 30663\/04, \u00a7 42, 18 December 2008;Magee v. the United Kingdom, no. 28135\/95, \u00a7 41, ECHR 2000 VI;Mayzit v. Russia, no. 63378\/00, \u00a7 77, 20 January 2005;Mustafa (Abu Hamza) v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 31411\/07, \u00a7 40, 18 January 2011;Panovits v. Cyprus, no. 4268\/04, \u00a7\u00a7 81-82, 11 December 2008;Pishchalnikov v. Russia, no. 7025\/04, 24 September 2009;Sakhnovskiy v. Russia [GC], no. 21272\/03, \u00a7 94, 2 November 2010;Salduz v. Turkey [GC], no. 36391\/02, ECHR 2008;\u015eedal v. Turkey (dec.), no. 38802\/08, \u00a7 33, 13 May 2014;Seleznev v. Russia, no. 15591\/03, \u00a7 67, 26 June 2008;Taxquet v. Belgium [GC], no. 926\/05, \u00a7 84, 16 November 2010;Titarenko v. Ukraine, no. 31720\/02, \u00a7 87, 20 September 2012;Yolda\u015f v. Turkey, no. 27503\/04, 23 February 2010", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "No violation of Article 6+6-3-c - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing) (Article 6 - Right to a fair trial;Article 6-3 - Rights of defence;Article 6-3-c - Defence through legal assistance);No violation of Article 6+6-3-c - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing) (Article 6 - Right to a fair trial;Article 6-3 - Rights of defence;Article 6-3-c - Defence through legal assistance)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "George Nicolaou;Ineta Ziemele;Krzysztof Wojtyczek;Ledi Bianku;P\u00e4ivi Hirvel\u00e4;Paul Mahoney;Zdravka Kalaydjieva", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1216JUD005054108" }, "254": { "webcast_id": "5054108_25112015", "hearing_date": "2015-11-25 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Ibrahim and Others v. the United Kingdom (nos. 50541\/08, 50571\/08, 50573\/08 and 40351\/09)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "40351\/09", "case_id": "001-118187", "case_name": "ABDURAHMAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-118187", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "2010-09-14 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "KING J.", "respondent": "GBR", "articles": "6", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "", "separate_opinion": "FALSE", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "255": { "webcast_id": "1803011_04112015", "hearing_date": "2015-11-04 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Magyar Helsinki Bizotts\u00e1g v. Hungary (no. 18030\/11) ", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "18030\/11", "case_id": "001-167828", "case_name": "CASE OF MAGYAR HELSINKI BIZOTTS\u00c1G v. HUNGARY", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-167828", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2016-11-08 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Section 19 (4) of the Data Act", "represented_by": "FAZEKAS T.", "respondent": "HUN", "articles": "8;8-1;10;10-1;10-2;35;35-3;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "A. Loersch and Nouvelle Association du Courrier v. Switzerland, nos. 23868\/94 and 23869\/94, Commission decision of 24 February 1995, DR 80, p. 162;Al-Adsani v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 35763\/97, \u00a7 55, ECHR 2001 XI;Al-Dulimi and Montana Management Inc. v. Switzerland [GC], no. 5809\/08, \u00a7 134, 21 June 2016;Amann v. Switzerland [GC], no. 27798\/95, \u00a7 65, ECHR 2000-II;Animal Defenders International v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 48876\/08, ECHR 2013 (extracts);Axel Springer AG v. Germany [GC], no. 39954\/08, \u00a7 87, 7 February 2012;Bader v. Austria, no. 26633\/95, Commission decision of 15 May 1996;Ba\u015fkaya and Ok\u00e7uo\u011flu v. Turkey [GC], nos. 23536\/94 and 24408\/94, \u00a7\u00a7 61-67, ECHR 1999 IV;Bayatyan v. Armenia [GC], no. 23459\/03, \u00a7 102 and \u00a7\u00a7 108-10, ECHR 2011;Biao v. Denmark [GC], no. 38590\/10, \u00a7 131, 24 May 2016;Bladet Troms\u00f8 and Stensaas v. Norway [GC], no. 21980\/93, ECHR 1999 III;Bosphorus Hava Yollar\u0131 Turizm ve Ticaret Anonim \u015eirketi v. Ireland [GC], no. 45036\/98, \u00a7 150, ECHR 2005 VI;Chapman v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 27238\/95, \u00a7 70, ECHR 2001 I;Chauvy and Others v. France, no. 64915\/01, \u00a7 68, ECHR 2004 VI;Christine Goodwin v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 28957\/95, ECHR 2002\u2011VI;Clavel v. Switzerland, no. 11854\/85, Commission decision of 15 October 1987, DR 54, p. 153;Couderc and Hachette Filipacchi Associ\u00e9s v. France [GC], no. 40454\/07, ECHR 2015 (extracts);Dammann v. Switzerland, no. 77551\/01, \u00a7 52, 25 April 2006;De Haes and Gijsels v. Belgium, 24 February 1997, \u00a7 37, Reports 1997 I;Delfi AS v. Estonia [GC], no. 64569\/09, \u00a7 133, ECHR 2015;Eccleston v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 42841\/02, 18 May 2004;Fressoz and Roire v. France [GC], no. 29183\/95, \u00a7 54, ECHR 1999 I;Gaskin v. the United Kingdom, 7 July 1989, Series A no. 160;Gillberg v. Sweden [GC], no. 41723\/06, 3 April 2012;Glass v. the United Kingdom, no. 61827\/00, \u00a7 75, ECHR 2004\u2011II;Golder v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1975, Series A no. 18;Goodwin v. the United Kingdom, 27 March 1996, \u00a7 39, Reports 1996 II;Gorzelik and Others v. Poland [GC], no. 44158\/98, \u00a7 67, ECHR 2004 I;Grupo Interpres SA v. Spain, no. 32849\/96, Commission decision of 7 April 1997, DR 89, p. 150;Guerra and Others v. Italy, 19 February 1998, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 I;Guseva v. Bulgaria, no. 6987\/07, 17 February 2015;Hassan v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 29750\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 77 and 102, ECHR 2014;Hertel v. Switzerland, 25 August 1998, \u00a7 46, Reports 1998\u2011VI;Ireland v. the United Kingdom, 18 January 1978, \u00a7 239, Series A no. 25;Johnston and Others v. Ireland, 18 December 1986, \u00a7\u00a7 51 et seq., Series A no. 112;Jones v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 42639\/04, 13 September 2005;Kenedi v. Hungary, no. 31475\/05, 26 May 2009;Leander v Sweden, 26 March 1987, Series A no. 116;Lindon, Otchakovsky-Laurens and July v. France [GC], nos. 21279\/02 and 36448\/02, \u00a7 48, ECHR 2007 IV;Lingens v. Austria, 8 July 1986, \u00a7\u00a7 38 and 41, Series A no. 103;Lithgow and Others v. the United Kingdom, 8 July 1986, \u00a7\u00a7 114 and 117, Series A no. 102;Loiseau v. France (dec.), no. 46809\/99, ECHR 2003-XII (extracts);Lustig-Prean and Beckett v. the United Kingdom, nos. 31417\/96 and 32377\/96, \u00a7 82, 27 September 1999;M.S. v. Sweden, 27 August 1997, \u00a7 47, Reports 1997 IV;Mamatkulov and Askarov v. Turkey [GC], nos. 46827\/99 and 46951\/99, ECHR 2005 I;Marckx v. Belgium, 13 June 1979, Series A no. 31;Mouvement ra\u00eblien suisse v. Switzerland [GC], no. 16354\/06, \u00a7 48, ECHR 2012 (extracts);Niemietz v. Germany, 16 December 1992, \u00a7 29, Series A no. 251 B;Nurminen and Others v. Finland, no. 27881\/95, Commission decision of 26 February 1997;Observer and Guardian v. the United Kingdom, 26 November 1991, \u00a7 59, Series A no. 216;\u00d6nery\u0131ld\u0131z v. Turkey [GC], no. 48939\/99, \u00a7 59, ECHR 2004\u2011XII;Opuz v. Turkey, no. 33401\/02, \u00a7 184, ECHR 2009;\u00d6sterreichische Vereinigung zur Erhaltung, St\u00e4rkung und Schaffung v. Austria, no. 39534\/07, 28 November 2013;P.G. and J.H. v. the United Kingdom, no. 44787\/98, \u00a7 57, ECHR 2001 IX;Peck v. the United Kingdom, no. 44647\/98, \u00a7 62, ECHR 2003 I;Perin\u00e7ek v. Switzerland [GC], no. 27510\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 227-28, ECHR 2015 (extracts);Pretty v. the United Kingdom, no. 2346\/02, \u00a7 61, ECHR 2002\u2011III;Rantsev v. Cyprus and Russia, no. 25965\/04, \u00a7 277, ECHR 2010 (extracts);Rekv\u00e9nyi v. Hungary [GC], no. 25390\/94, \u00a7 35, ECHR 1999 III;Roche v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 32555\/96, \u00a7 172, ECHR 2005 X;Ro\u015fiianu v. Romania, no. 27329\/06, 24 June 2014;S. and Marper v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 30562\/04 and 30566\/04, \u00a7 66, ECHR 2008;Saadi v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 13229\/03, \u00a7 62, ECHR 2008;Scoppola v. Italy (no. 2) [GC], no. 10249\/03, \u00a7\u00a7 104 109, 17 September 2009;Sdru\u017eeni Jiho\u010desk\u00e9 Matky v. the Czech Republic (dec.), no. 19101\/03, 10 July 2006;Shapovalov v. Ukraine, no. 45835\/05, 31 July 2012;Sigur\u00f0ur A. Sigurj\u00f3nsson v. Iceland, 30 June 1993, \u00a7 35, Series A no. 264;Sinan I\u015f\u0131k v. Turkey, no. 21924\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 42-53, ECHR 2010;S\u00eerbu and Others v. Moldova, nos. 73562\/01, 73565\/01, 73712\/01, 73744\/01, 73972\/01 and 73973\/01, \u00a7\u00a7 17-19, 15 June 2004;Sixteen Austrian Communes and Some of Their Councillors v. Austria, nos. 5767\/72 etc., Commission decision of 31 May 1974, Yearbook 1974, p. 338;Soering v. the United Kingdom, 7 July 1989, Series A no. 161;Stafford v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 46295\/99, \u00a7\u00a7 67-68, ECHR 2002-IV;Stec and Others v. the United Kingdom (dec.) [GC], nos. 65731\/01 and 65900\/01, \u00a7\u00a7 47-48, ECHR 2005 X;Steel and Morris v. the United Kingdom, no. 68416\/01, ECHR 2005 II;S\u00fcrek v. Turkey (no. 1) [GC], no. 26682\/95, \u00a7 61, ECHR 1999-IV;T\u00e1rsas\u00e1g a Szabads\u00e1gjogok\u00e9rt v. Hungary (no. 37374\/05, \u00a7 14, April 2009;Vilho Eskelinen and Others v. Finland [GC], no. 63235\/00, ECHR 2007\u2011II;Von Hannover v. Germany (no. 2) [GC], nos. 40660\/08 and 60641\/08, \u00a7 106, ECHR 2012;Weber v. Germany (dec.), no. 70287\/11, \u00a7 26, 6 January 2015;Witold Litwa v. Poland, no. 26629\/95, \u00a7\u00a7 57-59, ECHR 2000 III;X. v. Federal Republic of Germany, no. 8383\/78, Commission decision of 3 October 1979, Decisions and Reports (DR) 17, p. 227;Young, James and Webster v. the United Kingdom, 13 August 1981, \u00a7\u00a7 51-52, Series A no. 44;Youth Initiative for Human Rights v. Serbia, no. 48135\/06, 25 June 2013;Z v. Finland, 25 February 1997, \u00a7\u00a7 96-97, Reports 1997 I", "external_sources": "Articles 31 to 33 of the Vienna Convention of 23 May 1969 on the Law of Treaties;Article 19 of the 1966 International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights;Article 19 of the UN Universal Declaration;Article 19 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR);Article 42 of the European Union\u2019s Charter of Fundamental Rights as well as Regulation (EC) No. 1049\/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001;Recommendation Rec (2002) 2 of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe;Convention on Access to Official Documents of the Council of Europe;Declaration of Principles of Freedom of Expression in Africa, adopted by the African Commission on Human and Peoples\u2019 Rights in 2002;Convention for the Protection of Individuals with regard to Automatic Processing of Personal Data of the Council of Europe of 28 January 1981", "conclusion": "Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Article 35-3 - Ratione materiae);Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression -{General} (Article 10-1 - Freedom to impart information;Freedom to receive information);Pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Ale\u0161 Pejchal;Andr\u00e1s Saj\u00f3;Andr\u00e9 Potocki;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Egidijus K\u016bris;Ganna Yudkivska;Guido Raimondi;Helen Keller;Jon Fridrik Kj\u00f8lbro;Kristina Pardalos;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Luis L\u00f3pez Guerra;Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska;Neboj\u0161a Vu\u010dini\u0107;Paul Mahoney;Robert Spano;Ksenija Turkovi\u0107", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1108JUD001803011" }, "256": { "webcast_id": "1803011_04112015", "hearing_date": "2015-11-04 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Magyar Helsinki Bizotts\u00e1g v. Hungary (no. 18030\/11) ", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "18030\/11", "case_id": "001-115547", "case_name": "MAGYAR HELSINKI BIZOTTS\u00c1G v. HUNGARY", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-115547", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "2012-12-04 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "FAZEKAS T.", "respondent": "HUN", "articles": "10;10-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "", "separate_opinion": "FALSE", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "257": { "webcast_id": "5759208_21102015", "hearing_date": "2015-10-21 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Hutchinson v. the United Kingdom (no. 57592\/08)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "57592\/08", "case_id": "001-170347", "case_name": "CASE OF HUTCHINSON v. THE UNITED KINGDOM", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-170347", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2017-01-17 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Section 30 of the Crime (Sentences) Act 1997 ; Section 6 of the Human Rights Act 1998", "represented_by": "Kyles Legal Practice", "respondent": "GBR", "articles": "3", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Bodein v. France, no. 40014\/10, 13 November 2014;\u010ca\u010dko v. Slovakia, no. 49905\/08, 22 July 2014;E. v. Norway, 29 August 1990, \u00a7 60, Series A no. 181 A;Harakchiev and Tolumov v. Bulgaria, nos. 15018\/11 and 61199\/12, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Kafkaris v. Cyprus [GC], no. 21906\/04, ECHR 2008;Khoroshenko v. Russia [GC], no. 41418\/04, \u00a7 121, ECHR 2015;Kronfeldner v. Germany, no. 21906\/09, \u00a7 59, 19 January 2012;L\u00e1szl\u00f3 Magyar v. Hungary, no. 73593\/10, 20 May 2014;Murray v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 10511\/10, ECHR 2016;O.H. v. Germany, no. 4646\/08, \u00a7 118, 24 November 2011;\u00d6calan v. Turkey (no. 2), nos. 24069\/03, 197\/04, 6201\/06 and 10464\/07, 18 March 2014;Trabelsi v. Belgium, no. 140\/10, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Vinter and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 66069\/09, 130\/10 and 3896\/10, ECHR 2013 (extracts)", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading punishment;Inhuman punishment) (Substantive aspect)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Andr\u00e1s Saj\u00f3;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Branko Lubarda;Erik M\u00f8se;Ganna Yudkivska;Helena J\u00e4derblom;Josep Casadevall;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Luis L\u00f3pez Guerra;Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska;P\u00e4ivi Hirvel\u00e4;Paul Mahoney;Paulo Pinto De Albuquerque;Yonko Grozev;Ksenija Turkovi\u0107", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0117JUD005759208" }, "258": { "webcast_id": "5759208_21102015", "hearing_date": "2015-10-21 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Hutchinson v. the United Kingdom (no. 57592\/08)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "57592\/08", "case_id": "001-150778", "case_name": "CASE OF HUTCHINSON v. THE UNITED KINGDOM", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-150778", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 14, "document_date": "2015-02-03 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 3, "court": "7", "issue": "Section 30 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 ; Section 6(1) of the Human Rights Act 1998 ; Chapter 12 of the Indeterminate Sentence Manual (\u201cthe Lifer Manual\u201d)\n", "represented_by": "KYLES LEGAL PRACTICE", "respondent": "GBR", "articles": "3;35", "strasbourg_caselaw": "C.R. v. the United Kingdom, 22 November 1995, \u00a7 34, Series A no. 335 C;Cooper v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 48843\/99, \u00a7 125, ECHR 2003 XII;Harakchiev and Tolumov v. Bulgaria, nos. 15018\/11 and 61199\/12, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Kafkaris v. Cyprus [GC], no. 21906\/04, ECHR 2008;L\u00e1szl\u00f3 Magyar v. Hungary, no. 73593\/10, \u00a7\u00a7 46-53, 20 May 2014;\u00d6calan v. Turkey (no. 2), nos. 24069\/03, 197\/04, 6201\/06 and 10464\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 193-198, 18 March 2014;S\u00f6derman v. Sweden [GC], no. 5786\/08, \u00a7 102, ECHR 2013;Vinter and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 66069\/09, 130\/10 and 3896\/10, 9 July 2013;Vu\u010dkovi\u0107 and Others v. Serbia [GC], no. 17153\/11, \u00a7 80, 25 March 2014;Waite and Kennedy v. Germany [GC], no. 26083\/94, \u00a7 54, ECHR 1999 I", "external_sources": "Rules 6, 102.1 and 103.8 of the European Prison Rules;COE Committee of Ministers Resolution 76(2);COE Committee of Ministers Recommendation 2003(23) (on the management by prison administrations of life sentence and other long-term prisoners);COE Committee of Ministers Recommendation 2003(22) (on conditional release);Article 10 \u00a7 3 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the General Comment on that Article\n", "conclusion": "No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading punishment;Inhuman punishment) (Substantive aspect)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "George Nicolaou;Guido Raimondi;Krzysztof Wojtyczek;Ledi Bianku;Nona Tsotsoria;Paul Mahoney;Zdravka Kalaydjieva", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0203JUD005759208" }, "259": { "webcast_id": "5759208_21102015", "hearing_date": "2015-10-21 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Hutchinson v. the United Kingdom (no. 57592\/08)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "57592\/08", "case_id": "001-123857", "case_name": "HUTCHINSON v. THE UNITED KINGDOM", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-123857", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "2013-07-10 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "JULIAN YOUNG & CO.", "respondent": "GBR", "articles": "3", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "", "separate_opinion": "FALSE", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "260": { "webcast_id": "2375507_07102015", "hearing_date": "2015-10-07 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Buzadji v. Republic of Moldova (no. 23755\/07)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "23755\/07", "case_id": "001-164928", "case_name": "CASE OF BUZADJI v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-164928", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2016-07-05 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "", "represented_by": "NAGACEVSCHI F.", "respondent": "MDA", "articles": "5;5-1;5-1-c;5-3;34;35;35-1;41;P4-2;P4-2-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Aquilina v. Malta [GC], no. 25642\/94, \u00a7 47, ECHR 1999 III;Assanidze v. Georgia [GC], no. 71503\/01, \u00a7 171, ECHR 2004 II;Bykov v. Russia [GC], no. 4378\/02, \u00a7 64, 10 March 2009;Ciulla v. Italy, 22 February 1989, \u00a7 41, Series A no. 148;De Jong, Baljet and Van den Brink v. the Netherlands, 22 May 1984, \u00a7 44, Series A no. 77;De Wilde, Ooms and Versyp v. Belgium, 18 June 1971, \u00a7 65, Series A no. 12;Delijorgji v. Albania, no. 6858\/11, \u00a7 75, 28 April 2015;Guzzardi v. Italy, 6 November 1980, \u00a7\u00a7 92-93, Series A no. 39;I.A. v. France, 23 September 1998, \u00a7 108, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 VII;Idalov v. Russia [GC], no. 5826\/03, \u00a7 140, 22 May 2012;Ila\u015fcu and Others v. Moldova and Russia [GC], no. 48787\/99, \u00a7 461, ECHR 2004 VII;Ireland v. the United Kingdom, 18 January 1978, \u00a7 199, Series A no. 25;Kalashnikov v. Russia, no. 47095\/99, \u00a7 110, ECHR 2002 VI;Koutalidis v. Greece, no. 18785\/13, \u00a7 51, 27 November 2014;Kud\u0142a v. Poland [GC], no. 30210\/96, \u00a7\u00a7 110 et seq., ECHR 2000 XI;Kurt v. Turkey, 25 May 1998, \u00a7 123, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-III;Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772\/95, \u00a7 147, ECHR 2000 IV;Lavents v. Latvia, no. 58442\/00, \u00a7\u00a7 64-66, 28 November 2002;Letellier v. France, 26 June 1991, \u00a7 34, Series A no. 207;Lukanov v. Bulgaria, 20 March 1997, \u00a7 41, Reports 1997 II;Magee and Others v. the United Kingdom, nos. 26289\/12, 29062\/12 and 29891\/12, 12 May 2015;Mancini v. Italy, no. 44955\/98, \u00a717, ECHR 2001 IX;McKay v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 543\/03, \u00a7\u00a7 31-44, ECHR 2006 X;Medvedyev and Others v. France [GC], no. 3394\/03, \u00a7 119, ECHR 2010;Neumeister v. Austria, judgment of 27 June 1968, Series A no. 8, p. 37, \u00a7 4;Nikolova v. Bulgaria (no. 2), no. 40896\/98, \u00a7 60, 30 September 2004;Ninescu v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 47306\/07, \u00a7 53, 15 July 2014;Osmanovi\u0107 v. Croatia, no. 67604\/10, \u00a7\u00a7 40-41, 6 November 2012;Patsuria v. Georgia, no. 30779\/04, \u00a7 67, 6 November 2007;R.P. and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 38245\/08, \u00a7 47, 9 October 2012;Schiesser v. Switzerland, 4 December 1979, \u00a7 31, Series A no. 34;Solmaz v. Turkey, no. 27561\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 23-24, 16 January 2007;St\u00f6gm\u00fcller v. Austria, 10 November 1969, \u00a7 15, Series A no. 9;Storck v. Germany, no. 61603\/00, \u00a7 75, ECHR 2005 V;Svinarenko and Slyadnev v. Russia [GC], nos. 32541\/08 and 43441\/08, \u00a7 79, ECHR 2014 (extracts);T.W. v. Malta [GC], no. 25644\/94, \u00a7 41, 29 April 1999;Tomasi v. France, 27 August 1992, Series A no. 241 A;Toth v. Austria, 12 December 1991, \u00a7 70, Series A no. 224;\u0162urcan and \u0162urcan v. Moldova, no. 39835\/05, \u00a7 54, 23 October 2007;Wemhoff v. Germany, 27 June 1968, p. 23, Series A no. 7;Winterwerp v. the Netherlands, 24 October 1979, \u00a7 39, Series A no. 33;Zayidov v. Azerbaijan, no. 11948\/08, \u00a7 62, 20 February 2014", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Preliminary objection dismissed (Article 35-1 - Exhaustion of domestic remedies);Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Article 34 - Victim);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Reasonableness of pre-trial detention);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Andr\u00e1s Saj\u00f3;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Branko Lubarda;Dean Spielmann;Dmitry Dedov;Erik M\u00f8se;George Nicolaou;Guido Raimondi;J\u00e1n \u0160ikuta;Josep Casadevall;Kristina Pardalos;Krzysztof Wojtyczek;Ledi Bianku;Luis L\u00f3pez Guerra;Neboj\u0161a Vu\u010dini\u0107;Nona Tsotsoria;Paul Mahoney;Robert Spano;Vincent A. De Gaetano;Yonko Grozev", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0705JUD002375507" }, "261": { "webcast_id": "2375507_07102015", "hearing_date": "2015-10-07 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Buzadji v. Republic of Moldova (no. 23755\/07)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "23755\/07", "case_id": "001-148659", "case_name": "CASE OF BUZADJI v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-148659", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2014-12-16 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "6", "issue": "", "represented_by": "CERGA I.", "respondent": "MDA", "articles": "5;5-3", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Reasonableness of pre-trial detention)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "J\u00e1n \u0160ikuta;Josep Casadevall;Kristina Pardalos;Luis L\u00f3pez Guerra", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1216JUD002375507" }, "262": { "webcast_id": "4173810_16092015", "hearing_date": "2015-09-16 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Paposhvili v. Belgium (no. 41738\/10)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "41738\/10", "case_id": "001-169662", "case_name": "CASE OF PAPOSHVILI v. BELGIUM", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-169662", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2016-12-13 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "", "represented_by": "KERN J. ; VERBROUCK C.", "respondent": "BEL", "articles": "3;8;8-1;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "A.S. v. Switzerland, no. 39350\/13, 30 June 2015;Airey v. Ireland, 9 October 1979, \u00a7 26, Series A no. 32;Aswat v. the United Kingdom, no. 17299\/12, \u00a7 49, 16 April 2013;Bouyid v. Belgium [GC], no. 23380\/09, \u00a7 86, ECHR 2015;D. v. the United Kingdom, 2 May 1997, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997 III;E.O. v. Italy (dec.), no. 34724\/10, 10 May 2012;El-Masri v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia [GC], no. 39630\/09, ECHR 2012;F.G. v. Sweden [GC], no. 43611\/11, ECHR 2016;Hirsi Jamaa and Others v. Italy [GC], no. 27765\/09, ECHR 2012;Karagoz v. France (dec.), no. 47531\/99, 15 November 2001;Karner v. Austria, no. 40016\/98, ECHR 2003 IX;Khachatryan v. Belgium (dec.), no. 72597\/10, 7 April 2015;Kochieva and Others v. Sweden (dec.), no. 75203\/12, 30 April 2013;M.S.S. v. Belgium and Greece [GC], no. 30696\/09, ECHR 2011;Malhous v. the Czech Republic (dec.) [GC], no. 33071\/96, ECHR 2000\u2011XII;Mamatkulov and Askarov v. Turkey [GC], nos. 46827\/99 and 46951\/99, \u00a7 121, ECHR 2005-I;Maslov v. Austria [GC], no. 1638\/03, \u00a7 93, ECHR 2008;Murray v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 10511\/10, \u00a7 79, ECHR 2016;N. v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 26565\/05, ECHR 2008;Pretty v. the United Kingdom, no. 2346\/02, \u00a7 52, ECHR 2002 III;S.H.H. v. the United Kingdom, no. 60367\/10, 29 January 2013;Saadi v. Italy [GC], no. 37201\/06, ECHR 2008;Sufi and Elmi v. the United Kingdom, nos. 8319\/07 and 11449\/07, \u00a7 214, 28 June 2011;Tarakhel v. Switzerland ([GC], no. 29217\/12, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Tatar v. Switzerland, no. 65692\/12, 14 April 2015;Trabelsi v. Belgium, no. 140\/10, \u00a7 130, ECHR 2014 (extracts);V.S. and Others v. France (dec.), no. 35226\/11, 25 November 2014;Vilvarajah and Others v. the United Kingdom, 30 October 1991, Series A no. 215;Yoh-Ekale Mwanje v. Belgium, no. 10486\/10, 20 December 2011", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Expulsion) (Conditional) (Georgia);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Expulsion;Article 8-1 - Respect for family life) (Conditional) (Georgia);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Ale\u0161 Pejchal;Andr\u00e9 Potocki;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Ann Power-Forde;Dean Spielmann;Dmitry Dedov;Egidijus K\u016bris;Ganna Yudkivska;Guido Raimondi;Helena J\u00e4derblom;Johannes Silvis;Jon Fridrik Kj\u00f8lbro;Julia Laffranque;Khanlar Hajiyev;Kristina Pardalos;Luis L\u00f3pez Guerra;Mark Villiger;Neboj\u0161a Vu\u010dini\u0107;Paul Lemmens;Robert Spano;Ksenija Turkovi\u0107", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1213JUD004173810" }, "263": { "webcast_id": "4173810_16092015", "hearing_date": "2015-09-16 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Paposhvili v. Belgium (no. 41738\/10)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "41738\/10", "case_id": "001-142737", "case_name": "CASE OF PAPOSHVILI v. BELGIUM", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-142737", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2014-04-17 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 3, "court": "23", "issue": "Section 39\/82 of the Aliens Act ; Act of 15 March 2012 amending the Aliens Act", "represented_by": "KERN J.", "respondent": "BEL", "articles": "2;3;8;8-1;35;35-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Abdulaziz, Cabales and Balkandali v. the United Kingdom, 28 May 1985, \u00a7\u00a7 67-68, Series A no 94;Ahmut v. the Netherlands, 28 November 1996, \u00a7 63, Reports 1996 VI;Antwi and Others v. Norway, no 26940\/10, \u00a7 89, 14 February 2012;Aquilina v. Malta [GC], no 25642\/94, \u00a7 39, ECHR 1999 III;Arvelo Aponte v. the Netherlands, no 28770\/05, \u00a7 60, 3 November 2011;Boujlifa v. France, 21 October 1997, \u00a7 42, Reports 1997 VI;Boultif v. Switzerland, no 54273\/00, \u00a7 48, ECHR 2001 IX;D. v. the United Kingdom, 2 May 1997, Reports 1997 III;Darren Omoregie and Others v. Norway, no 265\/07, 31 July 2008;Gezginci v. Switzerland, no 16327\/05, \u00a7 67, 9 December 2010;G\u00fcl v. Switzerland, 19 February 1996, \u00a7 38, Reports 1996 I;Kanagaratnam v. Belgium, no 15297\/09, \u00a7 67, 13 December 2011;Maslov v. Austria [GC], no 1638\/03, \u00a7 68, ECHR 2008;Mi. L. v. France (dec.), no 23473\/11, \u00a7 33, 11 September 2012;Micallef v. Malta [GC], no 17056\/06, \u00a7 55, ECHR 2009;N. v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 26565\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 48 and 50, ECHR 2008;Nunez v. Norway, no 55597\/09, 28 June 2011;Popov v. France, nos. 39472\/07 and 39474\/07, \u00a7 109, 19 January 2012;Pretty v. the United Kingdom, no 2346\/02, \u00a7 52, ECHR 2002 III;Raninen v. Finland, 16 December 1997, \u00a7 41, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997 VIII;Rodrigues da Silva and Hoogkamer v. the Netherlands, no 50435\/99, \u00a7\u00a7 38-39, ECHR 2006-I;Solomon v. the Netherlands (dec.), no 44328\/98, 5 September 2000;Trabelsi v. Germany, no 41548\/06, 13 October 2011;Udeh v. Switzerland, no 12020\/09, 16 April 2013;\u00dcner v. the Netherlands [GC], no 46410\/99, \u00a7\u00a7 59 to 61, ECHR 2006 XII;Y.P. and L.P. v. France, no 32476\/06, \u00a7 53, 2 September 2010", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Preliminary objections dismissed (Article 35-1 - Exhaustion of domestic remedies);No violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2 - Expulsion) (Conditional) (Georgia);No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Expulsion) (Conditional) (Georgia);No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Expulsion) (Conditional) (Georgia)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Ale\u0161 Pejchal;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Ann Power-Forde;Ganna Yudkivska;Mark Villiger;Paul Lemmens", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0417JUD004173810" }, "264": { "webcast_id": "182806_02092015", "hearing_date": "2015-09-02 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "G.I.E.M s.r.l v. Italy (no. 1828\/06) , Hotel Promotion Bureau s.r.l. and Rita Sarda s.r.l. v. Italy (no. 34163\/07) and Falgest s.r.l. and Gironda v. Italy (no. 19029\/11)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "1828\/06", "case_id": "001-226009", "case_name": "CASE OF G.I.E.M. S.R.L. AND OTHERS v. ITALY", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-226009", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 12, "document_date": "2023-07-12 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 2, "court": "8", "issue": "", "represented_by": "MARIANI G. ; ROTUNNO F. ; LAVITOLA G. ; MANES V. ; LANA A.G. ; SACCUCCI A. ", "respondent": "ITA", "articles": "37;37-1;37-1-c;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Aviakompaniya A.T.I., ZAT v. Ukraine, no. 1006\/07, 5 October 2017;Brum\u0103rescu v. Romania (just satisfaction) [GC], no. 28342\/95, \u00a7 20, ECHR 2001-I;\r\nCapital Bank AD v. Bulgaria, no. 49429\/99, \u00a7 78, ECHR 2005 XII (extracts);Comingersoll S.A. v. Portugal [GC], no. 35382\/97, \u00a7 29, ECHR 2000-IV;\r\nDumitru v. Romania (just satisfaction), no. 4710\/04, \u00a7 11, 3 June 2014;Euromak Metal Doo v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, no. 68039\/14, 14 June 2018;G.I.E.M. S.r.l. and Others v. Italy [GC], nos. 1828\/06 and 2 others, 28 June 2018;Guiso-Gallisay v. Italy (just satisfaction) [GC], no. 58858\/00, \u00a7 90, 22 December 2009;Kuri\u0107 and Others v. Slovenia (just satisfaction) [GC], no. 26828\/06, \u00a7 79, ECHR 2014,;Molla Sali v. Greece (just satisfaction) [GC], no. 20452\/14, \u00a7 32, 18 June 2020;Nagmetov v. Russia [GC], no. 35589\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 65-66, 30 March 2017;Olewnik-Ciepli\u0144ska and Olewnik v. Poland, no. 20147\/15, \u00a7 150, 5 September 2019;RF SPOL. S R.O. v. Slovakia (dec.), no. 9926\/03, 20 October 2010;Schweizerische Radio-und Fernsehgesellschaft and publisuisse SA v. Switzerland, no. 41723\/14, \u00a7 43, 22 December 2020;Sud Fondi S.r.l. and Others v. Italy (just satisfaction), no. 75909\/01, 10 May 2012;Thaleia Karydi Axte v. Greece (just satisfaction), no. 44769\/07, \u00a7 18, 10 February 2011;\r\nTimakov and OOO ID Rubezh v. Russia, nos. 46232\/10 and 74770\/10, 8 September 2020;Uniya OOO and Belcourt Trading Company v. Russia, no. 4437\/03 and 13290\/03, 19 June 2014;Zhidov and Others v. Russia (just satisfaction), nos. 54490\/10 and 3 others, \u00a7 19, 17 March 2020\r\n", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Struck out of the list (Art. 37) Striking out applications-{general};(Art. 37-1) Striking out applications;(Art. 37-1-c) Continued examination not justified;Pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": null, "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0712JUD000182806" }, "265": { "webcast_id": "182806_02092015", "hearing_date": "2015-09-02 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "G.I.E.M s.r.l v. Italy (no. 1828\/06) , Hotel Promotion Bureau s.r.l. and Rita Sarda s.r.l. v. Italy (no. 34163\/07) and Falgest s.r.l. and Gironda v. Italy (no. 19029\/11)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "1828\/06", "case_id": "001-184525", "case_name": "CASE OF G.I.E.M. S.R.L. AND OTHERS v. ITALY", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-184525", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 14, "document_date": "2018-06-28 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Law no. 47 of 28 February 1985 ; Sections 18, 19 and 20 of Law no. 47\/1985, which became articles 30 and 44 of the Construction Code by Presidential Decree no. 380 of 6 June 2001 ; Article 4 \u00a7 4ter of Legislative Decree no. 78\/2009 introduced by Law no. 102\/2009 ; Articles 579 paragraph 3 and 676 of the Code of Criminal Procedure\r\n", "represented_by": "MARIANI G. ; ROTUNNO F. ; LAVITOLA G. ; MANES V. ; LANA A.G. ; SACCUCCI A. ", "respondent": "ITA", "articles": "6;6-2;7;7-1;35;35-1;35-3-a;41;P1-1;P1-1-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "A. Menarini Diagnostics S.r.l. v. Italy, no 43509\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 58-59, 27 September 2011;AGOSI v. the United Kingdom, 24 October 1986, \u00a7 55, Series A no 108;Allen v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 25424\/09, 12 July 2013;Al Nashif v. Bulgaria, no 50963\/99, \u00a7 123, 20 June 2002;Amuur v. France, 25 June 1996, \u00a7 50, Reports 1996-III;Anheuser-Busch Inv. v. Portugal [GC], no 73049\/01, \u00a7 83, ECHR 2007 I;Baars v. the Netherlands, no 44320\/98, \u00a7\u00a7 25-32, 28 October 2003;Berland v. France, no 42875\/10, \u00a7 42, 3 September 2015;Bosphorus Hava Yollari Turizm ve Ticaret Anonim Sirketi v. Ireland [GC], no 45036\/98, \u00a7 149, ECHR 2005 VI;Bowler International Unit v. France, no 1946\/06, \u00a7 67, 23 July 2009;Brosset-Triboulet and Others v. France [GC], no 34078\/02, \u00a7 87, 29 March 2010;Bulena v. the Czech Republic, no 57567\/00, \u00a7 37, 20 April 2004;Can\u00e1dy v. Slovakia, no 53371\/99, \u00a7 31, 16 November 2004;Capital Bank AD v. Bulgaria, no 49429\/99, \u00a7 134, ECHR 2005 XII (extracts);Del R\u00edo Prada v. Spain [GC], no 42750\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 82-88, ECHR 2013;Depalle v. France [GC], no 34044\/02, \u00a7 84, ECHR 2010;Didu v. Romania, no 34814\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 40-42, 14 April 2009;El-Masri v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia [GC], no 39630\/09, \u00a7 192, ECHR 2012;Engel and Others v. the Netherlands, 8 June 1976, \u00a7 81, Series A no. 22;Ezeh and Connors v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 39665\/98 and 40086\/98, \u00a7 123, ECHR 2003-X;G\u00e1ll v. Hungary, no 49570\/11, \u00a7 63, 25 June 2013;Giavi v. Greece, no 25816\/09, \u00a7 44, 3 October 2013;Giosakis v. Greece (no 3), no 5689\/08, \u00a7 41, 3 May 2011;Grande Stevens and Others v. Italy, nos. 18640\/10 and 4 others, 4 March 2014;Hammerton v. the United Kingdom, no 6287\/10, \u00a7 84, 17 March 2016;Hentrich v. France, \u00a7 49, 22 September 1994, , Series A no 296 A;Iatridis v. Greece [GC], no 31107\/96, \u00a7\u00a7 55-58, ECHR 1999-II;J.A. Pye (Oxford) Ltd and J.A. Pye (Oxford) Land Ltd v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 44302\/02, \u00a7 57, ECHR 2007 III;Jahn and Others v. Germany [GC], nos. 46720\/99, 72203\/01 and 72552\/01, \u00a7\u00a7 83-95, ECHR 2005-VI;James and Others v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1986, \u00a7 37, Series A no 98;Jamil v. France, 8 June 1995, \u00a7\u00a7 30-31, Series A no 317 B;Janosevic v. Sweden, no 34619\/97, \u00a7 68, ECHR 2002 VII;Jokela v. Finland, no 28856\/95, \u00a7 45, ECHR 2002 IV;Kadubec v. Slovakia, 2 September 1998, \u00a7 57, Reports 1998-VI;Kafkaris v. Cyprus [GC], no 21906\/04, \u00a7 142, ECHR 2008;Klouvi v. France, no 30754\/03, \u00a7 48, 30 June 2011;M. v. Germany, no 19359\/04, ECHR 2009;Maggio and Others v. Italy, nos. 46286\/09, 52851\/08, 53727\/08, 54486\/08 and 56001\/08, \u00a7 57, 31 May 2011;Mamidakis v. Greece, no 35533\/04, \u00a7 33, 11 January 2007;Paksas v. Lithuania [GC], no 34932\/04, \u00a7 75, ECHR 2011 (extracts);Paraponiaris v. Greece, no 42132\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 30-33, 25 September 2008;Salabiaku v. France, 7 October 1988, \u00a7\u00a7 27-28, Series A no 141 A;Saliba v. Malta (dec.), no 4251\/02, 23 November 2004;Sociedad An\u00f3nima del Ucieza v. Spain, no 38963\/08, \u00a7 74, 4 November 2014;Soci\u00e9t\u00e9 Oxyg\u00e8ne Plus v. France (dec.), no 76959\/11, \u00a7 47, 17 May 2016;Sovtransavto Holding v. Ukraine, no 48553\/99, \u00a7 96, ECHR 2002 VII;Sporrong and L\u00f6nnroth v. Sweden, 23 September 1982, \u00a7\u00a7 69-74, Series A no 52;Sud Fondi srl and Others v. Italy, no 75909\/01, 20 January 2009;Sud Fondi srl and Others v. Italy (just satisfaction), no 75909\/01, 10 May 2012;Sud Fondi srl and Others v. Italy (dec.), no 75909\/01, 30 August 2007;Taliadorou and Stylianou v. Cyprus, nos. 39627\/05 and 39631\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 27 and 56 59, 16 October 2008;Valico S.r.l v. Italy (dec.), no 70074\/01, ECHR 2006-III;Varvara v. Italy, no. 17475\/09, \u00a7 51, 29 October 2013;Vuckovic and Others v. Serbia (preliminary objection) [GC], nos. 17153\/11 and 29 others, \u00a7\u00a7 73-74, 25 March 2014;Welch v. the United Kingdom, 9 February 1995, \u00a7 27, Series A no 307-A;Yildirim v. Italy (dec.), no 38602\/02, ECHR 2003-IV;Zafranas v. Greece, no 4056\/08, \u00a7 36, 4 October 2011;Zollmann v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no 62902\/00, ECHR 2003 XII", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Abuse of the right of application;Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Violation of Article 7 - No punishment without law (Article 7-1 - Nulla poena sine lege;Conviction;Criminal offence);No violation of Article 7 - No punishment without law (Article 7-1 - Nulla poena sine lege;Conviction;Criminal offence);Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6-2 - Presumption of innocence);Just satisfaction reserved (Article 41 - Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Andr\u00e1s Saj\u00f3;Branko Lubarda;Egidijus K\u016bris;Erik M\u00f8se;Guido Raimondi;Helen Keller;Iulia Motoc;Jon Fridrik Kj\u00f8lbro;Khanlar Hajiyev;Kristina Pardalos;Luis L\u00f3pez Guerra;Paul Lemmens;Paulo Pinto De Albuquerque;Robert Spano;Yonko Grozev", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0628JUD000182806" }, "266": { "webcast_id": "182806_02092015", "hearing_date": "2015-09-02 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "G.I.E.M s.r.l v. Italy (no. 1828\/06) , Hotel Promotion Bureau s.r.l. and Rita Sarda s.r.l. v. Italy (no. 34163\/07) and Falgest s.r.l. and Gironda v. Italy (no. 19029\/11)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "1828\/06", "case_id": "001-156745", "case_name": "G.I.E.M. S.R.L. v. ITALY", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-156745", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "MARIANI G.", "respondent": "ITA", "articles": "6;6-1;7;13;P1-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Communicated", "separate_opinion": "", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "267": { "webcast_id": "182806_02092015", "hearing_date": "2015-09-02 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "G.I.E.M s.r.l v. Italy (no. 1828\/06) , Hotel Promotion Bureau s.r.l. and Rita Sarda s.r.l. v. Italy (no. 34163\/07) and Falgest s.r.l. and Gironda v. Italy (no. 19029\/11)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "34163\/07", "case_id": "001-226009", "case_name": "CASE OF G.I.E.M. S.R.L. AND OTHERS v. ITALY", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-226009", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 12, "document_date": "2023-07-12 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 2, "court": "8", "issue": "", "represented_by": "MARIANI G. ; ROTUNNO F. ; LAVITOLA G. ; MANES V. ; LANA A.G. ; SACCUCCI A. ", "respondent": "ITA", "articles": "37;37-1;37-1-c;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Aviakompaniya A.T.I., ZAT v. Ukraine, no. 1006\/07, 5 October 2017;Brum\u0103rescu v. Romania (just satisfaction) [GC], no. 28342\/95, \u00a7 20, ECHR 2001-I;\r\nCapital Bank AD v. Bulgaria, no. 49429\/99, \u00a7 78, ECHR 2005 XII (extracts);Comingersoll S.A. v. Portugal [GC], no. 35382\/97, \u00a7 29, ECHR 2000-IV;\r\nDumitru v. Romania (just satisfaction), no. 4710\/04, \u00a7 11, 3 June 2014;Euromak Metal Doo v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, no. 68039\/14, 14 June 2018;G.I.E.M. S.r.l. and Others v. Italy [GC], nos. 1828\/06 and 2 others, 28 June 2018;Guiso-Gallisay v. Italy (just satisfaction) [GC], no. 58858\/00, \u00a7 90, 22 December 2009;Kuri\u0107 and Others v. Slovenia (just satisfaction) [GC], no. 26828\/06, \u00a7 79, ECHR 2014,;Molla Sali v. Greece (just satisfaction) [GC], no. 20452\/14, \u00a7 32, 18 June 2020;Nagmetov v. Russia [GC], no. 35589\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 65-66, 30 March 2017;Olewnik-Ciepli\u0144ska and Olewnik v. Poland, no. 20147\/15, \u00a7 150, 5 September 2019;RF SPOL. S R.O. v. Slovakia (dec.), no. 9926\/03, 20 October 2010;Schweizerische Radio-und Fernsehgesellschaft and publisuisse SA v. Switzerland, no. 41723\/14, \u00a7 43, 22 December 2020;Sud Fondi S.r.l. and Others v. Italy (just satisfaction), no. 75909\/01, 10 May 2012;Thaleia Karydi Axte v. Greece (just satisfaction), no. 44769\/07, \u00a7 18, 10 February 2011;\r\nTimakov and OOO ID Rubezh v. Russia, nos. 46232\/10 and 74770\/10, 8 September 2020;Uniya OOO and Belcourt Trading Company v. Russia, no. 4437\/03 and 13290\/03, 19 June 2014;Zhidov and Others v. Russia (just satisfaction), nos. 54490\/10 and 3 others, \u00a7 19, 17 March 2020\r\n", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Struck out of the list (Art. 37) Striking out applications-{general};(Art. 37-1) Striking out applications;(Art. 37-1-c) Continued examination not justified;Pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": null, "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0712JUD000182806" }, "268": { "webcast_id": "182806_02092015", "hearing_date": "2015-09-02 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "G.I.E.M s.r.l v. Italy (no. 1828\/06) , Hotel Promotion Bureau s.r.l. and Rita Sarda s.r.l. v. Italy (no. 34163\/07) and Falgest s.r.l. and Gironda v. Italy (no. 19029\/11)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "34163\/07", "case_id": "001-184525", "case_name": "CASE OF G.I.E.M. S.R.L. AND OTHERS v. ITALY", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-184525", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 14, "document_date": "2018-06-28 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Law no. 47 of 28 February 1985 ; Sections 18, 19 and 20 of Law no. 47\/1985, which became articles 30 and 44 of the Construction Code by Presidential Decree no. 380 of 6 June 2001 ; Article 4 \u00a7 4ter of Legislative Decree no. 78\/2009 introduced by Law no. 102\/2009 ; Articles 579 paragraph 3 and 676 of the Code of Criminal Procedure\r\n", "represented_by": "MARIANI G. ; ROTUNNO F. ; LAVITOLA G. ; MANES V. ; LANA A.G. ; SACCUCCI A. ", "respondent": "ITA", "articles": "6;6-2;7;7-1;35;35-1;35-3-a;41;P1-1;P1-1-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "A. Menarini Diagnostics S.r.l. v. Italy, no 43509\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 58-59, 27 September 2011;AGOSI v. the United Kingdom, 24 October 1986, \u00a7 55, Series A no 108;Allen v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 25424\/09, 12 July 2013;Al Nashif v. Bulgaria, no 50963\/99, \u00a7 123, 20 June 2002;Amuur v. France, 25 June 1996, \u00a7 50, Reports 1996-III;Anheuser-Busch Inv. v. Portugal [GC], no 73049\/01, \u00a7 83, ECHR 2007 I;Baars v. the Netherlands, no 44320\/98, \u00a7\u00a7 25-32, 28 October 2003;Berland v. France, no 42875\/10, \u00a7 42, 3 September 2015;Bosphorus Hava Yollari Turizm ve Ticaret Anonim Sirketi v. Ireland [GC], no 45036\/98, \u00a7 149, ECHR 2005 VI;Bowler International Unit v. France, no 1946\/06, \u00a7 67, 23 July 2009;Brosset-Triboulet and Others v. France [GC], no 34078\/02, \u00a7 87, 29 March 2010;Bulena v. the Czech Republic, no 57567\/00, \u00a7 37, 20 April 2004;Can\u00e1dy v. Slovakia, no 53371\/99, \u00a7 31, 16 November 2004;Capital Bank AD v. Bulgaria, no 49429\/99, \u00a7 134, ECHR 2005 XII (extracts);Del R\u00edo Prada v. Spain [GC], no 42750\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 82-88, ECHR 2013;Depalle v. France [GC], no 34044\/02, \u00a7 84, ECHR 2010;Didu v. Romania, no 34814\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 40-42, 14 April 2009;El-Masri v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia [GC], no 39630\/09, \u00a7 192, ECHR 2012;Engel and Others v. the Netherlands, 8 June 1976, \u00a7 81, Series A no. 22;Ezeh and Connors v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 39665\/98 and 40086\/98, \u00a7 123, ECHR 2003-X;G\u00e1ll v. Hungary, no 49570\/11, \u00a7 63, 25 June 2013;Giavi v. Greece, no 25816\/09, \u00a7 44, 3 October 2013;Giosakis v. Greece (no 3), no 5689\/08, \u00a7 41, 3 May 2011;Grande Stevens and Others v. Italy, nos. 18640\/10 and 4 others, 4 March 2014;Hammerton v. the United Kingdom, no 6287\/10, \u00a7 84, 17 March 2016;Hentrich v. France, \u00a7 49, 22 September 1994, , Series A no 296 A;Iatridis v. Greece [GC], no 31107\/96, \u00a7\u00a7 55-58, ECHR 1999-II;J.A. Pye (Oxford) Ltd and J.A. Pye (Oxford) Land Ltd v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 44302\/02, \u00a7 57, ECHR 2007 III;Jahn and Others v. Germany [GC], nos. 46720\/99, 72203\/01 and 72552\/01, \u00a7\u00a7 83-95, ECHR 2005-VI;James and Others v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1986, \u00a7 37, Series A no 98;Jamil v. France, 8 June 1995, \u00a7\u00a7 30-31, Series A no 317 B;Janosevic v. Sweden, no 34619\/97, \u00a7 68, ECHR 2002 VII;Jokela v. Finland, no 28856\/95, \u00a7 45, ECHR 2002 IV;Kadubec v. Slovakia, 2 September 1998, \u00a7 57, Reports 1998-VI;Kafkaris v. Cyprus [GC], no 21906\/04, \u00a7 142, ECHR 2008;Klouvi v. France, no 30754\/03, \u00a7 48, 30 June 2011;M. v. Germany, no 19359\/04, ECHR 2009;Maggio and Others v. Italy, nos. 46286\/09, 52851\/08, 53727\/08, 54486\/08 and 56001\/08, \u00a7 57, 31 May 2011;Mamidakis v. Greece, no 35533\/04, \u00a7 33, 11 January 2007;Paksas v. Lithuania [GC], no 34932\/04, \u00a7 75, ECHR 2011 (extracts);Paraponiaris v. Greece, no 42132\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 30-33, 25 September 2008;Salabiaku v. France, 7 October 1988, \u00a7\u00a7 27-28, Series A no 141 A;Saliba v. Malta (dec.), no 4251\/02, 23 November 2004;Sociedad An\u00f3nima del Ucieza v. Spain, no 38963\/08, \u00a7 74, 4 November 2014;Soci\u00e9t\u00e9 Oxyg\u00e8ne Plus v. France (dec.), no 76959\/11, \u00a7 47, 17 May 2016;Sovtransavto Holding v. Ukraine, no 48553\/99, \u00a7 96, ECHR 2002 VII;Sporrong and L\u00f6nnroth v. Sweden, 23 September 1982, \u00a7\u00a7 69-74, Series A no 52;Sud Fondi srl and Others v. Italy, no 75909\/01, 20 January 2009;Sud Fondi srl and Others v. Italy (just satisfaction), no 75909\/01, 10 May 2012;Sud Fondi srl and Others v. Italy (dec.), no 75909\/01, 30 August 2007;Taliadorou and Stylianou v. Cyprus, nos. 39627\/05 and 39631\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 27 and 56 59, 16 October 2008;Valico S.r.l v. Italy (dec.), no 70074\/01, ECHR 2006-III;Varvara v. Italy, no. 17475\/09, \u00a7 51, 29 October 2013;Vuckovic and Others v. Serbia (preliminary objection) [GC], nos. 17153\/11 and 29 others, \u00a7\u00a7 73-74, 25 March 2014;Welch v. the United Kingdom, 9 February 1995, \u00a7 27, Series A no 307-A;Yildirim v. Italy (dec.), no 38602\/02, ECHR 2003-IV;Zafranas v. Greece, no 4056\/08, \u00a7 36, 4 October 2011;Zollmann v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no 62902\/00, ECHR 2003 XII", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Abuse of the right of application;Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Violation of Article 7 - No punishment without law (Article 7-1 - Nulla poena sine lege;Conviction;Criminal offence);No violation of Article 7 - No punishment without law (Article 7-1 - Nulla poena sine lege;Conviction;Criminal offence);Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6-2 - Presumption of innocence);Just satisfaction reserved (Article 41 - Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Andr\u00e1s Saj\u00f3;Branko Lubarda;Egidijus K\u016bris;Erik M\u00f8se;Guido Raimondi;Helen Keller;Iulia Motoc;Jon Fridrik Kj\u00f8lbro;Khanlar Hajiyev;Kristina Pardalos;Luis L\u00f3pez Guerra;Paul Lemmens;Paulo Pinto De Albuquerque;Robert Spano;Yonko Grozev", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0628JUD000182806" }, "269": { "webcast_id": "182806_02092015", "hearing_date": "2015-09-02 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "G.I.E.M s.r.l v. Italy (no. 1828\/06) , Hotel Promotion Bureau s.r.l. and Rita Sarda s.r.l. v. Italy (no. 34163\/07) and Falgest s.r.l. and Gironda v. Italy (no. 19029\/11)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "34163\/07", "case_id": "001-156746", "case_name": "HOTEL PROMOTION BUREAU S.R.L. AND OTHERS v. ITALY", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-156746", "type": "DECISIONS", "typedescription": 9, "document_date": "", "collection": "CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "5", "issue": "", "represented_by": "LAVITOLA G.", "respondent": "ITA", "articles": "6;7;13;35;P1-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Partly inadmissible", "separate_opinion": "", "judges": "Andr\u00e1s Saj\u00f3;Fran\u00e7oise Tulkens;Guido Raimondi;Helen Keller;Isabelle Berro-Lef\u00e8vre;Paulo Pinto De Albuquerque", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0605DEC003416307" }, "270": { "webcast_id": "182806_02092015", "hearing_date": "2015-09-02 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "G.I.E.M s.r.l v. Italy (no. 1828\/06) , Hotel Promotion Bureau s.r.l. and Rita Sarda s.r.l. v. Italy (no. 34163\/07) and Falgest s.r.l. and Gironda v. Italy (no. 19029\/11)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "19029\/11", "case_id": "001-226009", "case_name": "CASE OF G.I.E.M. S.R.L. AND OTHERS v. ITALY", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-226009", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 12, "document_date": "2023-07-12 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 2, "court": "8", "issue": "", "represented_by": "MARIANI G. ; ROTUNNO F. ; LAVITOLA G. ; MANES V. ; LANA A.G. ; SACCUCCI A. ", "respondent": "ITA", "articles": "37;37-1;37-1-c;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Aviakompaniya A.T.I., ZAT v. Ukraine, no. 1006\/07, 5 October 2017;Brum\u0103rescu v. Romania (just satisfaction) [GC], no. 28342\/95, \u00a7 20, ECHR 2001-I;\r\nCapital Bank AD v. Bulgaria, no. 49429\/99, \u00a7 78, ECHR 2005 XII (extracts);Comingersoll S.A. v. Portugal [GC], no. 35382\/97, \u00a7 29, ECHR 2000-IV;\r\nDumitru v. Romania (just satisfaction), no. 4710\/04, \u00a7 11, 3 June 2014;Euromak Metal Doo v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, no. 68039\/14, 14 June 2018;G.I.E.M. S.r.l. and Others v. Italy [GC], nos. 1828\/06 and 2 others, 28 June 2018;Guiso-Gallisay v. Italy (just satisfaction) [GC], no. 58858\/00, \u00a7 90, 22 December 2009;Kuri\u0107 and Others v. Slovenia (just satisfaction) [GC], no. 26828\/06, \u00a7 79, ECHR 2014,;Molla Sali v. Greece (just satisfaction) [GC], no. 20452\/14, \u00a7 32, 18 June 2020;Nagmetov v. Russia [GC], no. 35589\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 65-66, 30 March 2017;Olewnik-Ciepli\u0144ska and Olewnik v. Poland, no. 20147\/15, \u00a7 150, 5 September 2019;RF SPOL. S R.O. v. Slovakia (dec.), no. 9926\/03, 20 October 2010;Schweizerische Radio-und Fernsehgesellschaft and publisuisse SA v. Switzerland, no. 41723\/14, \u00a7 43, 22 December 2020;Sud Fondi S.r.l. and Others v. Italy (just satisfaction), no. 75909\/01, 10 May 2012;Thaleia Karydi Axte v. Greece (just satisfaction), no. 44769\/07, \u00a7 18, 10 February 2011;\r\nTimakov and OOO ID Rubezh v. Russia, nos. 46232\/10 and 74770\/10, 8 September 2020;Uniya OOO and Belcourt Trading Company v. Russia, no. 4437\/03 and 13290\/03, 19 June 2014;Zhidov and Others v. Russia (just satisfaction), nos. 54490\/10 and 3 others, \u00a7 19, 17 March 2020\r\n", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Struck out of the list (Art. 37) Striking out applications-{general};(Art. 37-1) Striking out applications;(Art. 37-1-c) Continued examination not justified;Pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": null, "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0712JUD000182806" }, "271": { "webcast_id": "182806_02092015", "hearing_date": "2015-09-02 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "G.I.E.M s.r.l v. Italy (no. 1828\/06) , Hotel Promotion Bureau s.r.l. and Rita Sarda s.r.l. v. Italy (no. 34163\/07) and Falgest s.r.l. and Gironda v. Italy (no. 19029\/11)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "19029\/11", "case_id": "001-184525", "case_name": "CASE OF G.I.E.M. S.R.L. AND OTHERS v. ITALY", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-184525", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 14, "document_date": "2018-06-28 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Law no. 47 of 28 February 1985 ; Sections 18, 19 and 20 of Law no. 47\/1985, which became articles 30 and 44 of the Construction Code by Presidential Decree no. 380 of 6 June 2001 ; Article 4 \u00a7 4ter of Legislative Decree no. 78\/2009 introduced by Law no. 102\/2009 ; Articles 579 paragraph 3 and 676 of the Code of Criminal Procedure\r\n", "represented_by": "MARIANI G. ; ROTUNNO F. ; LAVITOLA G. ; MANES V. ; LANA A.G. ; SACCUCCI A. ", "respondent": "ITA", "articles": "6;6-2;7;7-1;35;35-1;35-3-a;41;P1-1;P1-1-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "A. Menarini Diagnostics S.r.l. v. Italy, no 43509\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 58-59, 27 September 2011;AGOSI v. the United Kingdom, 24 October 1986, \u00a7 55, Series A no 108;Allen v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 25424\/09, 12 July 2013;Al Nashif v. Bulgaria, no 50963\/99, \u00a7 123, 20 June 2002;Amuur v. France, 25 June 1996, \u00a7 50, Reports 1996-III;Anheuser-Busch Inv. v. Portugal [GC], no 73049\/01, \u00a7 83, ECHR 2007 I;Baars v. the Netherlands, no 44320\/98, \u00a7\u00a7 25-32, 28 October 2003;Berland v. France, no 42875\/10, \u00a7 42, 3 September 2015;Bosphorus Hava Yollari Turizm ve Ticaret Anonim Sirketi v. Ireland [GC], no 45036\/98, \u00a7 149, ECHR 2005 VI;Bowler International Unit v. France, no 1946\/06, \u00a7 67, 23 July 2009;Brosset-Triboulet and Others v. France [GC], no 34078\/02, \u00a7 87, 29 March 2010;Bulena v. the Czech Republic, no 57567\/00, \u00a7 37, 20 April 2004;Can\u00e1dy v. Slovakia, no 53371\/99, \u00a7 31, 16 November 2004;Capital Bank AD v. Bulgaria, no 49429\/99, \u00a7 134, ECHR 2005 XII (extracts);Del R\u00edo Prada v. Spain [GC], no 42750\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 82-88, ECHR 2013;Depalle v. France [GC], no 34044\/02, \u00a7 84, ECHR 2010;Didu v. Romania, no 34814\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 40-42, 14 April 2009;El-Masri v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia [GC], no 39630\/09, \u00a7 192, ECHR 2012;Engel and Others v. the Netherlands, 8 June 1976, \u00a7 81, Series A no. 22;Ezeh and Connors v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 39665\/98 and 40086\/98, \u00a7 123, ECHR 2003-X;G\u00e1ll v. Hungary, no 49570\/11, \u00a7 63, 25 June 2013;Giavi v. Greece, no 25816\/09, \u00a7 44, 3 October 2013;Giosakis v. Greece (no 3), no 5689\/08, \u00a7 41, 3 May 2011;Grande Stevens and Others v. Italy, nos. 18640\/10 and 4 others, 4 March 2014;Hammerton v. the United Kingdom, no 6287\/10, \u00a7 84, 17 March 2016;Hentrich v. France, \u00a7 49, 22 September 1994, , Series A no 296 A;Iatridis v. Greece [GC], no 31107\/96, \u00a7\u00a7 55-58, ECHR 1999-II;J.A. Pye (Oxford) Ltd and J.A. Pye (Oxford) Land Ltd v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 44302\/02, \u00a7 57, ECHR 2007 III;Jahn and Others v. Germany [GC], nos. 46720\/99, 72203\/01 and 72552\/01, \u00a7\u00a7 83-95, ECHR 2005-VI;James and Others v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1986, \u00a7 37, Series A no 98;Jamil v. France, 8 June 1995, \u00a7\u00a7 30-31, Series A no 317 B;Janosevic v. Sweden, no 34619\/97, \u00a7 68, ECHR 2002 VII;Jokela v. Finland, no 28856\/95, \u00a7 45, ECHR 2002 IV;Kadubec v. Slovakia, 2 September 1998, \u00a7 57, Reports 1998-VI;Kafkaris v. Cyprus [GC], no 21906\/04, \u00a7 142, ECHR 2008;Klouvi v. France, no 30754\/03, \u00a7 48, 30 June 2011;M. v. Germany, no 19359\/04, ECHR 2009;Maggio and Others v. Italy, nos. 46286\/09, 52851\/08, 53727\/08, 54486\/08 and 56001\/08, \u00a7 57, 31 May 2011;Mamidakis v. Greece, no 35533\/04, \u00a7 33, 11 January 2007;Paksas v. Lithuania [GC], no 34932\/04, \u00a7 75, ECHR 2011 (extracts);Paraponiaris v. Greece, no 42132\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 30-33, 25 September 2008;Salabiaku v. France, 7 October 1988, \u00a7\u00a7 27-28, Series A no 141 A;Saliba v. Malta (dec.), no 4251\/02, 23 November 2004;Sociedad An\u00f3nima del Ucieza v. Spain, no 38963\/08, \u00a7 74, 4 November 2014;Soci\u00e9t\u00e9 Oxyg\u00e8ne Plus v. France (dec.), no 76959\/11, \u00a7 47, 17 May 2016;Sovtransavto Holding v. Ukraine, no 48553\/99, \u00a7 96, ECHR 2002 VII;Sporrong and L\u00f6nnroth v. Sweden, 23 September 1982, \u00a7\u00a7 69-74, Series A no 52;Sud Fondi srl and Others v. Italy, no 75909\/01, 20 January 2009;Sud Fondi srl and Others v. Italy (just satisfaction), no 75909\/01, 10 May 2012;Sud Fondi srl and Others v. Italy (dec.), no 75909\/01, 30 August 2007;Taliadorou and Stylianou v. Cyprus, nos. 39627\/05 and 39631\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 27 and 56 59, 16 October 2008;Valico S.r.l v. Italy (dec.), no 70074\/01, ECHR 2006-III;Varvara v. Italy, no. 17475\/09, \u00a7 51, 29 October 2013;Vuckovic and Others v. Serbia (preliminary objection) [GC], nos. 17153\/11 and 29 others, \u00a7\u00a7 73-74, 25 March 2014;Welch v. the United Kingdom, 9 February 1995, \u00a7 27, Series A no 307-A;Yildirim v. Italy (dec.), no 38602\/02, ECHR 2003-IV;Zafranas v. Greece, no 4056\/08, \u00a7 36, 4 October 2011;Zollmann v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no 62902\/00, ECHR 2003 XII", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Abuse of the right of application;Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Violation of Article 7 - No punishment without law (Article 7-1 - Nulla poena sine lege;Conviction;Criminal offence);No violation of Article 7 - No punishment without law (Article 7-1 - Nulla poena sine lege;Conviction;Criminal offence);Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6-2 - Presumption of innocence);Just satisfaction reserved (Article 41 - Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Andr\u00e1s Saj\u00f3;Branko Lubarda;Egidijus K\u016bris;Erik M\u00f8se;Guido Raimondi;Helen Keller;Iulia Motoc;Jon Fridrik Kj\u00f8lbro;Khanlar Hajiyev;Kristina Pardalos;Luis L\u00f3pez Guerra;Paul Lemmens;Paulo Pinto De Albuquerque;Robert Spano;Yonko Grozev", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0628JUD000182806" }, "272": { "webcast_id": "182806_02092015", "hearing_date": "2015-09-02 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "G.I.E.M s.r.l v. Italy (no. 1828\/06) , Hotel Promotion Bureau s.r.l. and Rita Sarda s.r.l. v. Italy (no. 34163\/07) and Falgest s.r.l. and Gironda v. Italy (no. 19029\/11)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "19029\/11", "case_id": "001-157226", "case_name": "FALGEST S.R.L. AND GIRONDA v. ITALY", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-157226", "type": "DECISIONS", "typedescription": 9, "document_date": "", "collection": "CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "5", "issue": "", "represented_by": "LANA A.G. ; SACCUCCI A.", "respondent": "ITA", "articles": "6;6-1;6-2;7;13;35;P1-1;P7-2", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Partly inadmissible", "separate_opinion": "", "judges": "Andr\u00e1s Saj\u00f3;Guido Raimondi;Helen Keller;Neboj\u0161a Vu\u010dini\u0107;Peer Lorenzen", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0430DEC001902911" }, "273": { "webcast_id": "4246113_08072015", "hearing_date": "2015-07-08 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Kar\u00e1csony and Others v. Hungary (no. 42461\/13) and Sz\u00e9l and Others v. Hungary (no. 44357\/13)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "42461\/13", "case_id": "001-162831", "case_name": "CASE OF KAR\u00c1CSONY AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-162831", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2016-05-17 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Section 26 \u00a7\u00a7 1 of the Constitutional Court Act no. CLI ; Section 48 \u00a7 3 and 49 \u00a7 4 of the Parliament Act ; Article 5 \u00a7 7 of the Fundamental Law", "represented_by": "KARSAI D.", "respondent": "HUN", "articles": "10;10-1;10-2;35;35-1;41;P1-3", "strasbourg_caselaw": "A, B and C v. Ireland [GC], no. 25579\/05, \u00a7 281, ECHR 2010;A. v. the United Kingdom, no. 35373\/97, ECHR 2002 X;Amuur v. France, 25 June 1996, \u00a7 50, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 III;Animal Defenders International v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 48876\/08, \u00a7 100, ECHR 2013 (extracts);Association Ekin v. France, no. 39288\/98, ECHR 2001 VIII;C.G.I.L. and Cofferati v. Italy, no. 46967\/07, \u00a7 71, 24 February 2009;Castells v. Spain, 23 April 1992, Series A no. 236;Centro Europa 7 S.r.l. and Di Stefano v. Italy [GC], no. 38433\/09, ECHR 2012;Cordova v. Italy (no. 1), no. 40877\/98, ECHR 2003 I;Cordova v. Italy (no. 2), no. 45649\/99, \u00a7 60, ECHR 2003 I (extracts);Cumhuriyet Vakf\u0131 and Others v. Turkey, no. 28255\/07, 8 October 2013;De Jorio v. Italy, no. 73936\/01, \u00a7 52, 3 June 2004;Delfi AS v. Estonia [GC], no. 64569\/09, ECHR 2015;F\u00e9ret v. Belgium, no. 15615\/07, \u00a7 65, 16 July 2009;G\u00e4fgen v. Germany [GC], no. 22978\/05, \u00a7 141, ECHR 2010;Golder v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1975, \u00a7 34, Series A no. 18;Gorzelik and Others v. Poland [GC], no. 44158\/98, \u00a7 90, ECHR 2004 I;Hoon v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 14832\/11, 13 November 2014;Huhtam\u00e4ki v. Finland, no. 54468\/09, \u00a7 51, 6 March 2012;Iatridis v. Greece [GC], no. 31107\/96, \u00a7 58, ECHR 1999 II;Incal v. Turkey, 9 June 1998, \u00a7 53, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 IV;Jerusalem v. Austria, no. 26958\/95, \u00a7 36, ECHR 2001 II;Kar\u00e1csony and Others v. Hungary, no. 42461\/13, \u00a7\u00a7 32-33, 16 September 2014;Kart v. Turkey [GC], no. 8917\/05, ECHR 2009 (extracts);Klass and Others v. Germany, 6 September 1978, \u00a7 55, Series A no. 28;Korbely v. Hungary [GC], no. 9174\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 72-73, ECHR 2008;Kudeshkina v. Russia, no. 29492\/05, \u00a7 83, 26 February 2009;Kudrevi\u010dius and Others v. Lithuania [GC], no. 37553\/05, 15 October 2015;Kyprianou v. Cyprus [GC], no. 73797\/01, \u00a7\u00a7 171 and 181, ECHR 2005 XIII;Leyla \u015eahin v. Turkey [GC], no. 44774\/98, \u00a7 108, ECHR 2005 XI;Lindon, Otchakovsky-Laurens and July v. France [GC], nos. 21279\/02 and 36448\/02, \u00a7 41, ECHR 2007 IV;Lombardi Vallauri v. Italy, no. 39128\/05, 20 October 2009;Maestri v. Italy [GC], no. 39748\/98, \u00a7 30, ECHR 2004-I;Magyar Kereszt\u00e9ny Mennonita Egyh\u00e1z and Others v. Hungary, nos. 70945\/11, 23611\/12, 26998\/12, 41150\/12, 41155\/12, 41463\/12, 41553\/12, 54977\/12 and 56581\/12, \u00a7 50, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Malone v. the United Kingdom, 2 August 1984, \u00a7 67, Series A no. 82;McFarlane v. Ireland [GC], no. 31333\/06, \u00a7 107, 10 September 2010;Morice v. France [GC], no. 29369\/10, \u00a7 155, 23 April 2015;O\u2019Keeffe v. Ireland [GC], no. 35810\/09, \u00a7 199, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Otegi Mondragon v. Spain, no. 2034\/07, \u00a7 50, ECHR 2011;Parrillo v. Italy [GC], no. 46470\/11, \u00a7 87, 27 August 2015;Patrono, Cascini and Stefanelli v. Italy, no. 10180\/04, \u00a7 61, 20 April 2006;Perin\u00e7ek v. Switzerland [GC], no. 27510\/08, \u00a7 197, 15 October 2015;Piermont v. France, 27 April 1995, \u00a7 76 in fine, Series A no. 314;Rotaru v. Romania [GC], no. 28341\/95, \u00a7 52, ECHR 2000-V;Sanoma Uitgevers B.V. v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 38224\/03, \u00a7 100, 14 September 2010;Sayg\u0131l\u0131 and Seyman v. Turkey, no. 51041\/99, \u00a7\u00a7 24-25, 27 June 2006;Steel and Morris v. the United Kingdom, no. 68416\/01, \u00a7 95, ECHR 2005 II;Stoll v. Switzerland [GC], no. 69698\/01, \u00a7 106, ECHR 2007 V;S\u00fcrek v. Turkey (no. 1) [GC], no. 26682\/95, \u00a7 61, ECHR 1999 IV;Syngelidis v. Greece, no. 24895\/07, \u00a7 42, 11 February 2010;Sz\u00e9l and Others v. Hungary, no. 44357\/13, \u00a7\u00a7 30 31, 16 September 2014;T\u0103nase v. Moldova [GC], no. 7\/08, ECHR 2010;United Communist Party of Turkey and Others v. Turkey, 30 January 1998, \u00a7 45, Reports 1998 I;Vu\u010dkovi\u0107 and Others v. Serbia (preliminary objection), [GC], no. 17153\/11 and 29 other cases, \u00a7\u00a7 69-77, 25 March 2014;Waite and Kennedy v. Germany [GC], no. 26083\/94, \u00a7 54, ECHR 1999 I;X and Others v. Austria [GC], no. 19010\/07, \u00a7 163, 19 February 2013;Young, James and Webster v. the United Kingdom, 13 August 1981, \u00a7 63, Series A no. 44;\u017ddanoka v. Latvia [GC], no. 58278\/00, \u00a7\u00a7 98 and 103, ECHR 2006 IV;Zollmann v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 62902\/00, ECHR 2003 XII", "external_sources": "Article 41 \u00a7 2 (a) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union;Venice Commission Report on the Role of the Opposition in a Democratic Parliament (Study No. 497\/2008), 84th Plenary Session, 15-16 October 2010;Venice Commission Report on the Scope and Lifting of Parliamentary Immunities (Study No. 714\/2013), 98th Plenary Session, 21-22 March 2014;Rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (Resolution 1202 (1999) adopted on 4 November 1999 with subsequent modifications of the Rules);Resolution 1965 (2013) of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe on the Discipline of the Members of the Parliamentary Assembly;Resolution 1601 (2008) of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe on Procedural Guidelines on the Rights and Responsibilities of the Opposition in a Democratic Parliament;Article 28 of the Statute of the Council of Europe;Rule 11 \u00a7\u00a7 2 and 3 of the Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament (8th parliamentary term, September 2015);Chapter IV of the Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament on Measures to be taken in the event of non compliance with the standards of conduct of members;Annex XV (Guidelines for the interpretation of the standards of conduct of Members) to the Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament;Rules 36 to 38 of the Rules of Procedure of the Bundestag, Germany;Rules 58 \u00a7 2 and 59 of the Rules of Procedure of the House of Representatives, Netherlands", "conclusion": "Preliminary objection dismissed (Article 35-1 - Effective domestic remedy);Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression -{General} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression);Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Damage - award (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "FALSE", "judges": "Andr\u00e1s Saj\u00f3;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Branko Lubarda;Egidijus K\u016bris;Erik M\u00f8se;Guido Raimondi;Helena J\u00e4derblom;J\u00e1n \u0160ikuta;Johannes Silvis;Jon Fridrik Kj\u00f8lbro;Khanlar Hajiyev;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Luis L\u00f3pez Guerra;Mark Villiger;Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska;Neboj\u0161a Vu\u010dini\u0107;Robert Spano;Vincent A. De Gaetano;Yonko Grozev;Ksenija Turkovi\u0107", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0517JUD004246113" }, "274": { "webcast_id": "4246113_08072015", "hearing_date": "2015-07-08 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Kar\u00e1csony and Others v. Hungary (no. 42461\/13) and Sz\u00e9l and Others v. Hungary (no. 44357\/13)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "42461\/13", "case_id": "001-146384", "case_name": "CASE OF KAR\u00c1CSONY AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-146384", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2014-09-16 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 3, "court": "5", "issue": "Section 2(2) and 49(4) of the Act no. XXXVI of 2012 on Parliament (\u201cOgytv\u201d)", "represented_by": "KARSAI D.", "respondent": "HUN", "articles": "10;10-1;10-2;13;13+10-1;35;35-1;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "A. v. the United Kingdom, no. 35373\/97, \u00a7 77, ECHR 2002 X;Alekseyev v. Russia, nos. 4916\/07, 25924\/08 and 14599\/09, \u00a7 80, 21 October 2010;Association Ekin v. France, no. 39288\/98, ECHR 2001-VIII;Boyle and Rice v. the United Kingdom, 27 April 1988, \u00a7 52, Series A no. 131;C.G.I.L. and Cofferati v. Italy, no. 46967\/07, 24 February 2009;Campbell and Fell v. the United Kingdom, 28 June 1984, \u00a7 76, Series A no. 80;Chauvy and Others v. France, no. 64915\/01, \u00a7 70, ECHR 2004-VI;Cordova v. Italy (no. 1), no. 40877\/98, ECHR 2003 I;Cordova v. Italy (no. 2), no. 45649\/99, ECHR 2003 I (extracts);Cumhuriyet Vakf\u0131 and Others v. Turkey, no. 28255\/07, \u00a7 59, 8 October 2013;Demicoli v. Malta, 27 August 1991, \u00a7 39, Series A no. 210;Feldek v. Slovakia, no. 29032\/95, \u00a7 74, ECHR 2001-VIII;Handyside v. the United Kingdom, 7 December 1976, \u00a7 49, Series A no. 24;Hugh Jordan v. the United Kingdom, no. 24746\/94, \u00a7 154, ECHR 2001 III (extracts);Igor Kabanov v. Russia, no. 8921\/05, \u00a7 52, 3 February 2011;Ilhan v. Turkey [GC], no. 22277\/93, ECHR 2000-VII, \u00a7 97;Jersild v. Denmark, 23 September 1994, \u00a7 31, Series A no. 298;Jerusalem v. Austria no. 26958\/95, \u00a7\u00a7 36 and 40, ECHR 2001-II;Kart v. Turkey [GC], no. 8917\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 81-82, ECHR 2009 (extracts);Lombardi Vallauri v. Italy, no. 39128\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 45-46, 20 October 2009;Oberschlick v. Austria (no. 1), 23 May 1991, \u00a7 57, Series A no. 204;Observer and Guardian v. the United Kingdom, 26 November 1991, \u00a7 59, Series A no. 216;Oleksandr Volkov v. Ukraine, no. 21722\/11, \u00a7 122, ECHR 2013;Perna v. Italy [GC], no. 48898\/99, \u00a7 39, ECHR 2003-V;Refah Partisi (the Welfare Party) and Others v. Turkey [GC], nos. 41340\/98, 41342\/98, 41343\/98 and 41344\/98, \u00a7 89, ECHR 2003 II;Savino and Others v. Italy, nos. 17214\/05, 20329\/05 and 42113\/04, \u00a7\u00a7 91-93, 28 April 2009;Sayg\u0131l\u0131 and Seyman v. Turkey, no 51041\/99, \u00a7\u00a7 24-25, 27 June 2006;Sergey Kuznetsov v. Russia, no. 10877\/04, \u00a7 45, 23 October 2008;Steel and Morris v. the United Kingdom, no. 68416\/01, \u00a7 95, ECHR 2005-II;S\u00fcrek v. Turkey (no. 1) [GC], no. 26682\/95, \u00a7 61, ECHR 1999-IV;Tsalkitzis v. Greece, no. 11801\/04, 16 November 2006;Uj v. Hungary, no. 23954\/10, \u00a7 22, 19 July 2011;Z. and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 29392\/95, \u00a7 109, ECHR 2001 V;Zana v. Turkey, 25 November 1997, \u00a7 51, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997\u2011VII", "external_sources": "Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament;Rules of the House of the French Assembl\u00e9e Nationale\n", "conclusion": "Preliminary objections dismissed (Article 35-1 - Effective domestic remedy);Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression -{General} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression);Violation of Article 13+10-1 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 10 - Freedom of expression -{General};Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression);Pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage - award", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Andr\u00e1s Saj\u00f3;Egidijus K\u016bris;Guido Raimondi;Jon Fridrik Kj\u00f8lbro;Neboj\u0161a Vu\u010dini\u0107;Robert Spano", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0916JUD004246113" }, "275": { "webcast_id": "4246113_08072015", "hearing_date": "2015-07-08 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Kar\u00e1csony and Others v. Hungary (no. 42461\/13) and Sz\u00e9l and Others v. Hungary (no. 44357\/13)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "42461\/13", "case_id": "001-138866", "case_name": "KAR\u00c1CSONY AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-138866", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "KARSAI D.", "respondent": "HUN", "articles": "10;10-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "", "separate_opinion": "", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "276": { "webcast_id": "4246113_08072015", "hearing_date": "2015-07-08 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Kar\u00e1csony and Others v. Hungary (no. 42461\/13) and Sz\u00e9l and Others v. Hungary (no. 44357\/13)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "44357\/13", "case_id": "001-162831", "case_name": "CASE OF KAR\u00c1CSONY AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-162831", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2016-05-17 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Section 26 \u00a7\u00a7 1 of the Constitutional Court Act no. CLI ; Section 48 \u00a7 3 and 49 \u00a7 4 of the Parliament Act ; Article 5 \u00a7 7 of the Fundamental Law", "represented_by": "KARSAI D.", "respondent": "HUN", "articles": "10;10-1;10-2;35;35-1;41;P1-3", "strasbourg_caselaw": "A, B and C v. Ireland [GC], no. 25579\/05, \u00a7 281, ECHR 2010;A. v. the United Kingdom, no. 35373\/97, ECHR 2002 X;Amuur v. France, 25 June 1996, \u00a7 50, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 III;Animal Defenders International v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 48876\/08, \u00a7 100, ECHR 2013 (extracts);Association Ekin v. France, no. 39288\/98, ECHR 2001 VIII;C.G.I.L. and Cofferati v. Italy, no. 46967\/07, \u00a7 71, 24 February 2009;Castells v. Spain, 23 April 1992, Series A no. 236;Centro Europa 7 S.r.l. and Di Stefano v. Italy [GC], no. 38433\/09, ECHR 2012;Cordova v. Italy (no. 1), no. 40877\/98, ECHR 2003 I;Cordova v. Italy (no. 2), no. 45649\/99, \u00a7 60, ECHR 2003 I (extracts);Cumhuriyet Vakf\u0131 and Others v. Turkey, no. 28255\/07, 8 October 2013;De Jorio v. Italy, no. 73936\/01, \u00a7 52, 3 June 2004;Delfi AS v. Estonia [GC], no. 64569\/09, ECHR 2015;F\u00e9ret v. Belgium, no. 15615\/07, \u00a7 65, 16 July 2009;G\u00e4fgen v. Germany [GC], no. 22978\/05, \u00a7 141, ECHR 2010;Golder v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1975, \u00a7 34, Series A no. 18;Gorzelik and Others v. Poland [GC], no. 44158\/98, \u00a7 90, ECHR 2004 I;Hoon v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 14832\/11, 13 November 2014;Huhtam\u00e4ki v. Finland, no. 54468\/09, \u00a7 51, 6 March 2012;Iatridis v. Greece [GC], no. 31107\/96, \u00a7 58, ECHR 1999 II;Incal v. Turkey, 9 June 1998, \u00a7 53, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 IV;Jerusalem v. Austria, no. 26958\/95, \u00a7 36, ECHR 2001 II;Kar\u00e1csony and Others v. Hungary, no. 42461\/13, \u00a7\u00a7 32-33, 16 September 2014;Kart v. Turkey [GC], no. 8917\/05, ECHR 2009 (extracts);Klass and Others v. Germany, 6 September 1978, \u00a7 55, Series A no. 28;Korbely v. Hungary [GC], no. 9174\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 72-73, ECHR 2008;Kudeshkina v. Russia, no. 29492\/05, \u00a7 83, 26 February 2009;Kudrevi\u010dius and Others v. Lithuania [GC], no. 37553\/05, 15 October 2015;Kyprianou v. Cyprus [GC], no. 73797\/01, \u00a7\u00a7 171 and 181, ECHR 2005 XIII;Leyla \u015eahin v. Turkey [GC], no. 44774\/98, \u00a7 108, ECHR 2005 XI;Lindon, Otchakovsky-Laurens and July v. France [GC], nos. 21279\/02 and 36448\/02, \u00a7 41, ECHR 2007 IV;Lombardi Vallauri v. Italy, no. 39128\/05, 20 October 2009;Maestri v. Italy [GC], no. 39748\/98, \u00a7 30, ECHR 2004-I;Magyar Kereszt\u00e9ny Mennonita Egyh\u00e1z and Others v. Hungary, nos. 70945\/11, 23611\/12, 26998\/12, 41150\/12, 41155\/12, 41463\/12, 41553\/12, 54977\/12 and 56581\/12, \u00a7 50, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Malone v. the United Kingdom, 2 August 1984, \u00a7 67, Series A no. 82;McFarlane v. Ireland [GC], no. 31333\/06, \u00a7 107, 10 September 2010;Morice v. France [GC], no. 29369\/10, \u00a7 155, 23 April 2015;O\u2019Keeffe v. Ireland [GC], no. 35810\/09, \u00a7 199, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Otegi Mondragon v. Spain, no. 2034\/07, \u00a7 50, ECHR 2011;Parrillo v. Italy [GC], no. 46470\/11, \u00a7 87, 27 August 2015;Patrono, Cascini and Stefanelli v. Italy, no. 10180\/04, \u00a7 61, 20 April 2006;Perin\u00e7ek v. Switzerland [GC], no. 27510\/08, \u00a7 197, 15 October 2015;Piermont v. France, 27 April 1995, \u00a7 76 in fine, Series A no. 314;Rotaru v. Romania [GC], no. 28341\/95, \u00a7 52, ECHR 2000-V;Sanoma Uitgevers B.V. v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 38224\/03, \u00a7 100, 14 September 2010;Sayg\u0131l\u0131 and Seyman v. Turkey, no. 51041\/99, \u00a7\u00a7 24-25, 27 June 2006;Steel and Morris v. the United Kingdom, no. 68416\/01, \u00a7 95, ECHR 2005 II;Stoll v. Switzerland [GC], no. 69698\/01, \u00a7 106, ECHR 2007 V;S\u00fcrek v. Turkey (no. 1) [GC], no. 26682\/95, \u00a7 61, ECHR 1999 IV;Syngelidis v. Greece, no. 24895\/07, \u00a7 42, 11 February 2010;Sz\u00e9l and Others v. Hungary, no. 44357\/13, \u00a7\u00a7 30 31, 16 September 2014;T\u0103nase v. Moldova [GC], no. 7\/08, ECHR 2010;United Communist Party of Turkey and Others v. Turkey, 30 January 1998, \u00a7 45, Reports 1998 I;Vu\u010dkovi\u0107 and Others v. Serbia (preliminary objection), [GC], no. 17153\/11 and 29 other cases, \u00a7\u00a7 69-77, 25 March 2014;Waite and Kennedy v. Germany [GC], no. 26083\/94, \u00a7 54, ECHR 1999 I;X and Others v. Austria [GC], no. 19010\/07, \u00a7 163, 19 February 2013;Young, James and Webster v. the United Kingdom, 13 August 1981, \u00a7 63, Series A no. 44;\u017ddanoka v. Latvia [GC], no. 58278\/00, \u00a7\u00a7 98 and 103, ECHR 2006 IV;Zollmann v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 62902\/00, ECHR 2003 XII", "external_sources": "Article 41 \u00a7 2 (a) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union;Venice Commission Report on the Role of the Opposition in a Democratic Parliament (Study No. 497\/2008), 84th Plenary Session, 15-16 October 2010;Venice Commission Report on the Scope and Lifting of Parliamentary Immunities (Study No. 714\/2013), 98th Plenary Session, 21-22 March 2014;Rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (Resolution 1202 (1999) adopted on 4 November 1999 with subsequent modifications of the Rules);Resolution 1965 (2013) of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe on the Discipline of the Members of the Parliamentary Assembly;Resolution 1601 (2008) of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe on Procedural Guidelines on the Rights and Responsibilities of the Opposition in a Democratic Parliament;Article 28 of the Statute of the Council of Europe;Rule 11 \u00a7\u00a7 2 and 3 of the Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament (8th parliamentary term, September 2015);Chapter IV of the Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament on Measures to be taken in the event of non compliance with the standards of conduct of members;Annex XV (Guidelines for the interpretation of the standards of conduct of Members) to the Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament;Rules 36 to 38 of the Rules of Procedure of the Bundestag, Germany;Rules 58 \u00a7 2 and 59 of the Rules of Procedure of the House of Representatives, Netherlands", "conclusion": "Preliminary objection dismissed (Article 35-1 - Effective domestic remedy);Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression -{General} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression);Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Damage - award (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "FALSE", "judges": "Andr\u00e1s Saj\u00f3;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Branko Lubarda;Egidijus K\u016bris;Erik M\u00f8se;Guido Raimondi;Helena J\u00e4derblom;J\u00e1n \u0160ikuta;Johannes Silvis;Jon Fridrik Kj\u00f8lbro;Khanlar Hajiyev;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Luis L\u00f3pez Guerra;Mark Villiger;Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska;Neboj\u0161a Vu\u010dini\u0107;Robert Spano;Vincent A. De Gaetano;Yonko Grozev;Ksenija Turkovi\u0107", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0517JUD004246113" }, "277": { "webcast_id": "4246113_08072015", "hearing_date": "2015-07-08 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Kar\u00e1csony and Others v. Hungary (no. 42461\/13) and Sz\u00e9l and Others v. Hungary (no. 44357\/13)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "44357\/13", "case_id": "001-146385", "case_name": "CASE OF SZ\u00c9L AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-146385", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2014-09-16 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 3, "court": "5", "issue": "Section 2(2) and 49(4) of the Act no. XXXVI of 2012 on Parliament (\u201cOgytv\u201d)", "represented_by": "KARSAI D.", "respondent": "HUN", "articles": "10;10-1;10-2;13;13+10-1;35;35-1;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "A. v. the United Kingdom, no. 35373\/97, \u00a7 77, ECHR 2002 X;Alekseyev v. Russia, nos. 4916\/07, 25924\/08 and 14599\/09, \u00a7 80, 21 October 2010;Association Ekin v. France, no. 39288\/98, \u00a7 56, ECHR 2001-VIII;Boyle and Rice v. the United Kingdom, 27 April 1988, \u00a7 52, Series A no. 131;C.G.I.L. and Cofferati v. Italy, no. 46967\/07, 24 February 2009;Campbell and Fell v. the United Kingdom, 28 June 1984, \u00a7 76, Series A no. 80;Chauvy and Others v. France, no. 64915\/01, \u00a7 70, ECHR 2004-VI;Cordova v. Italy (no. 1), no. 40877\/98, ECHR 2003 I;Cordova v. Italy (no. 2), no. 45649\/99, ECHR 2003 I (extracts);Cumhuriyet Vakf\u0131 and Others v. Turkey, no. 28255\/07, \u00a7 59, 8 October 2013;Demicoli v. Malta, 27 August 1991, \u00a7 39, Series A no. 210;Feldek v. Slovakia, no. 29032\/95, \u00a7 74, ECHR 2001-VIII;Handyside v. the United Kingdom, 7 December 1976, \u00a7 49, Series A no. 24;Hugh Jordan v. the United Kingdom, no. 24746\/94, \u00a7 154, ECHR 2001 III (extracts);Igor Kabanov v. Russia, no. 8921\/05, \u00a7 52, 3 February 2011;Ilhan v. Turkey [GC], no. 22277\/93, \u00a7 97, ECHR 2000-VII;Jersild v. Denmark, 23 September 1994, \u00a7 31, Series A no. 298;Jerusalem v. Austria no. 26958\/95, \u00a7\u00a7 36 and 40, ECHR 2001-II;Kart v. Turkey [GC], no. 8917\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 81-82, ECHR 2009 (extracts);Lombardi Vallauri v. Italy, no. 39128\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 45-46, 20 October 2009;Oberschlick v. Austria (no. 1), 23 May 1991, \u00a7 57, Series A no. 204;Observer and Guardian v. the United Kingdom, 26 November 1991, \u00a7 59, Series A no. 216;Oleksandr Volkov v. Ukraine, no. 21722\/11, \u00a7 122, ECHR 2013;Refah Partisi (the Welfare Party) and Others v. Turkey [GC], nos. 41340\/98, 41342\/98, 41343\/98 and 41344\/98, \u00a7 89, ECHR 2003 II;Savino and Others v. Italy, nos. 17214\/05, 20329\/05 and 42113\/04, \u00a7\u00a7 91-93, 28 April 2009;Sayg\u0131l\u0131 and Seyman v. Turkey, no 51041\/99, \u00a7\u00a7 24-25, 27 June 2006;Sergey Kuznetsov v. Russia, no. 10877\/04, \u00a7 45, 23 October 2008;Steel and Morris v. the United Kingdom, no. 68416\/01, \u00a7 95, ECHR 2005-II;S\u00fcrek v. Turkey (no. 1) [GC], no. 26682\/95, \u00a7 61, ECHR 1999-IV;Tsalkitzis v. Greece, no. 11801\/04, 16 November 2006;Uj v. Hungary, no. 23954\/10, \u00a7 22, 19 July 2011;Z. and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 29392\/95, \u00a7 109, ECHR 2001 V;Zana v. Turkey, 25 November 1997, \u00a7 51, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997\u2011VII", "external_sources": "Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament;Rules of the House of the French Assembl\u00e9e Nationale", "conclusion": "Preliminary objections dismissed (Article 35-1 - Effective domestic remedy);Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression -{General} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression);Violation of Article 13+10-1 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 10 - Freedom of expression -{General};Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression);Pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage - award", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Andr\u00e1s Saj\u00f3;Egidijus K\u016bris;Guido Raimondi;Jon Fridrik Kj\u00f8lbro;Neboj\u0161a Vu\u010dini\u0107;Robert Spano", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0916JUD004435713" }, "278": { "webcast_id": "4246113_08072015", "hearing_date": "2015-07-08 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Kar\u00e1csony and Others v. Hungary (no. 42461\/13) and Sz\u00e9l and Others v. Hungary (no. 44357\/13)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "44357\/13", "case_id": "001-138868", "case_name": "SZ\u00c9L AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-138868", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "KARSAI D.", "respondent": "HUN", "articles": "10;10-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "", "separate_opinion": "", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "279": { "webcast_id": "4489810_01072015", "hearing_date": "2015-07-01 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Jeronovi\u010ds v. Latvia (no. 44898\/10)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "44898\/10", "case_id": "001-165032", "case_name": "CASE OF JERONOVI\u010cS v. LATVIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-165032", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2016-07-05 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Sections 393 and 655 to 657 of the Criminal Procedure Law ", "represented_by": "NIKULCEVA I.", "respondent": "LVA", "articles": "3;34;35;35-1;35-3;37;37-1;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Aksoy v. Turkey, 18 December 1996, \u00a7 95, Reports 1996 VI;Aleksentseva and Others v. Russia (nos. 75025\/01, 75026\/01, 75028\/01, 75029\/01, 75031\/01, 75033\/01, 75034\/01, 75036\/01, 76386\/01, 77049\/01, 77051\/01, 77052\/01, 77053\/01, 3999\/02, 5314\/02, 5384\/02, 5388\/02, 5419\/02 and 8192\/02, decisions of 4 September 2003, 23 March 2006, and judgment of 17 January 2008, \u00a7\u00a7 14-17;Assenov and Others v. Bulgaria, 28 October 1998, \u00a7 102, Reports 1998 VIII;Baybora and Others v. Cyprus (dec.), no. 77116\/01, 22 October 2002;Bochan v. Ukraine (no. 2) [GC], no. 22251\/08, \u00a7 44, ECHR 2015;Bonomo and Others v. Italy (dec.), nos. 17634\/11 and 164 other applications, 9 April 2015;Bouyid v. Belgium [GC], no. 23380\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 114-123, 28 September 2015;Brecknell v. the United Kingdom, no. 32457\/04, \u00a7\u00a7 66-67, 27 November 2007;Bulut and Yavuz v. Turkey, (dec.) no. 73065\/01, 28 May 2002;B\u00fcy\u00fckda\u011f v. Turkey, no. 28340\/95, \u00a7 64, 21 December 2000;Canbek v. Turkey (dec.), no. 5286\/10, 13 January 2015;Chiragov and Others v. Armenia [GC], no. 13216\/05, \u00a7 220, ECHR 2015;Denisov v. Russia (dec.), no. 33408\/03, 6 May 2004;Egmez v. Cyprus, no. 30873\/96, \u00a7 70, ECHR 2000 XII;El-Masri v. \u201cthe former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia\u201d [GC], no. 39630\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 182-185, ECHR 2012;G\u00e4fgen v. Germany [GC], no. 22978\/05, ECHR 2010;Galstyan v. Armenia, no. 26986\/03, \u00a7 39, 15 November 2007;Giuliani and Gaggio v. Italy [GC], no. 23458\/02, \u00a7 301, ECHR 2011 (extracts);H. v. Iceland (dec.) no. 29785\/07, 27 September 2011;Hackett v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 34698\/04, 10 May 2005;Haralambie v. Romania, no. 21737\/03, \u00a7 70, 27 October 2009;Harrison and Others v. the United Kingdom, nos. 44301\/13, 44379\/13 and 44384\/13, \u00a7 51, 25 March 2014;Hazar and Others v. Turkey (dec.), no. 62566\/00 et seq., 10 January 2002;Ielcean v. Romania (dec.), no. 76048\/11, 7 October 2014;Josipovi\u0107 v. Serbia (dec.), no. 18369\/07, 4 March 2008;Kelly v. the United Kingdom, no. 10626\/83, Commission decision of 7 May 1985, Decisions and Reports (DR) 42, p. 205;Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772\/95, \u00a7 131, ECHR 2000 IV;Mocanu and Others v. Romania [GC], nos. 10865\/09, 45886\/07 and 32431\/08, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Musayeva and Others v. Russia (dec.), no. 74239\/01, 1 June 2006;Mustafa Tun\u00e7 and Fecire Tun\u00e7 v. Turkey [GC], no. 24014\/05, \u00a7 172, 14 April 2015;Nachova and Others v. Bulgaria [GC], nos. 43577\/98 and 43579\/98, \u00a7 123, ECHR 2005 VII;Prystavska v. Ukraine (dec.), no. 21287\/02, 17 December 2002;Ramsahai and Others v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 52391\/99, \u00a7 324, ECHR 2007 II;Rantsev v. Cyprus and Russia, no. 25965\/04, \u00a7 197, ECHR 2010 (extracts);Rezgui v. France (dec.), no. 49859\/99, ECHR 2000-XI;Sapeyan v. Armenia, no. 35738\/03, \u00a7 21, 13 January 2009;Schulz v. Germany (dec.), no. 4800\/12, 31 March 2015;Sroka v. Poland (dec.), no. 42801\/07, 6 March 2012;Stanev v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 36760\/06, \u00a7 252, ECHR 2012;Stanimirovi\u0107 v. Serbia, no. 26088\/06, \u00a7 29, 18 October 2011;Tahsin Acar v. Turkey (preliminary objection) [GC], no. 26307\/95, \u00a7\u00a7 75-77, ECHR 2003 VI;Tucka v. the United Kingdom (no. 1) (dec.), no. 34586\/10, \u00a7 14, 18 January 2010;Tuna v. Turkey, no. 22339\/03, \u00a7\u00a7 58-63, 19 January 2010;Union of Jehovah\u2019s Witnesses and Others v. Georgia (dec.), no. 72874\/01, 21 April 2015;Varnava and Others v. Turkey [GC], nos. 16064\/90, 16065\/90, 16066\/90, 16068\/90, 16069\/90, 16070\/90, 16071\/90, 16072\/90 and 16073\/90, \u00a7 157, ECHR 2009;Volokhy v. Ukraine, no. 23543\/02, \u00a7 37, 2 November 2006;Williams v. the United Kingdom (dec.) no. 32567\/06, 17 February 2009;Withey v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 59493\/00, ECHR 2003-X;Ya\u015fa v. Turkey, 2 September 1998, \u00a7 74, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 VI;Younger v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 57420\/00, ECHR 2003-I;\u017darkovi\u0107 and Others v. Croatia (dec.), no. 75187\/12, 9 June 2015;\u017darskis v. Latvia (dec.), no. 33695\/03, \u00a7 38, 17 March 2009", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Preliminary objections joined to merits and dismissed (Article 34 - Victim);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Ale\u0161 Pejchal;Andr\u00e9 Potocki;Dean Spielmann;George Nicolaou;Guido Raimondi;Helen Keller;Ineta Ziemele;Johannes Silvis;Jon Fridrik Kj\u00f8lbro;Josep Casadevall;Kristina Pardalos;Krzysztof Wojtyczek;Ledi Bianku;Mark Villiger;Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska;P\u00e4ivi Hirvel\u00e4;Paul Mahoney;Paulo Pinto De Albuquerque;Zdravka Kalaydjieva", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0705JUD004489810" }, "280": { "webcast_id": "4489810_01072015", "hearing_date": "2015-07-01 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Jeronovi\u010ds v. Latvia (no. 44898\/10)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "44898\/10", "case_id": "001-114334", "case_name": "JERONOVI\u010cS v. LATVIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-114334", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "2012-10-09 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "N\/A", "respondent": "LVA", "articles": "6;6-1;13", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "", "separate_opinion": "FALSE", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "281": { "webcast_id": "4489810_01072015", "hearing_date": "2015-07-01 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Jeronovi\u010ds v. Latvia (no. 44898\/10)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "44898\/10", "case_id": "001-114288", "case_name": "JERONOVI\u010cS v. LATVIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-114288", "type": "DECISIONS", "typedescription": 9, "document_date": "", "collection": "CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "5", "issue": "", "represented_by": "N\/A", "respondent": "LVA", "articles": "3;6;13;35", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Partly inadmissible", "separate_opinion": "", "judges": "Guido Raimondi;Helen Keller;Ineta Ziemele;Paulo Pinto De Albuquerque", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1009DEC004489810" }, "282": { "webcast_id": "4488309_23062015", "hearing_date": "2015-06-23 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Nasr and Ghali v. Italy (no. 44883\/09)", "hearing_type": "Chamber hearing", "appno": "44883\/09", "case_id": "001-161247", "case_name": "CASE OF NASR AND GHALI v. ITALY", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-161247", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2016-02-23 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 2, "court": "7", "issue": "", "represented_by": "BAUCCIO L.", "respondent": "ITA", "articles": "1;3;5;5-1;8;8-1;8-2;13;13+3;13+5;13+8;35;35-1;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Abd\u00fclsamet Yaman v. Turkey, no 32446\/96, \u00a7\u00a7 57-59, 2 November 2004;Akdivar and Others v. Turkey, 16 September 1996, \u00a7 68, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 IV;Aksoy v. Turkey, 18 December 1996, \u00a7 64, Reports 1996 VI;Bat\u0131 and Others v. Turkey, nos. 33097\/96 and 57834\/00, \u00a7\u00a7 142-147, ECHR 2004 IV (extracts);Baumann v. France, no 33592\/96, \u00a7 47, ECHR 2001 V;\u00c7ak\u0131c\u0131 v. Turkey [GC], no 23657\/94, \u00a7 85, ECHR 1999 IV;Cestaro v. Italy, no 6884\/11, 7 April 2015;Chahal v. the United Kingdom, 15 November 1996, \u00a7 118, Reports 1996 V;Dembele v. Switzerland, no 74010\/11, \u00a7 33, 24 September 2013;Demopoulos and Others v. Turkey (dec.) [GC], nos. 46113\/99, 3843\/02, 13751\/02, 13466\/03, 10200\/04, 14163\/04, 19993\/04 and 21819\/04, \u00a7 70, ECHR 2010;Egmez v. Cyprus, no 30873\/96, \u00a7 78, ECHR 2000 XII;El-Masri v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia [GC], no 39630\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 137-148, ECHR 2012;Erdal Aslan v. Turkey, nos. 25060\/02 and 1705\/03, \u00a7\u00a7 76-77, 2 December 2008;H\u00fcseyin \u015eim\u015fek v. Turkey, no 68881\/01, \u00a7\u00a7 68-70, 20 May 2008;Ila\u015fcu and Others v. Moldova and Russia [GC], no 48787\/99, \u00a7 318, ECHR 2004 VII;\u0130lhan v. Turkey [GC], no 22277\/93, \u00a7 85, ECHR 2000 VII;Imakayeva v. Russia, no 7615\/02, \u00a7 164, ECHR 2006 XIII (extracts);Ireland v. the United Kingdom, 18 January 1978, \u00a7 162, Series A no 25;Jabari v. Turkey, no 40035\/98, \u00a7 50, ECHR 2000-VIII;Jalloh v. Germany [GC], no 54810\/00, \u00a7 67, ECHR 2006 IX;Karoussiotis v. Portugal, no 23205\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 57 and 87-92, ECHR 2011;Kopylov v. Russia, no 3933\/04, \u00a7 119, 29 July 2010;Krastanov v. Bulgaria, no 50222\/99, \u00a7 53, 30 September 2004;Kurt v. Turkey, 25 May 1998, \u00a7 140, Reports 1998-III;Labita v. Italy [GC], no 26772\/95, \u00a7 119, ECHR 2000 IV;\u0141atak v. Poland (dec.), no 52070\/08, 12 October 2010;Mahmut Kaya v. Turkey, no 22535\/93, \u00a7 115, ECHR 2000 III;Mamatkoulov and Askarov v. Turkey [GC], nos. 46827\/99 and 46951\/99, \u00a7 67, ECHR 2005-I;Rafaa v. France, no 25393\/10, \u00a7 33, 30 May 2013;Saadi v. Italy [GC], no 37201\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 125-126, ECHR 2008;Saba v. Italy, no 36629\/10, \u00a7\u00a7 79-80, 1 July 2014;Salman v. Turkey [GC], no 21986\/93, \u00a7 100, ECHR 2000 VII;Samoylov v. Russia, no 64398\/01, \u00a7 39, 2 October 2008;Sapo\u017ekovs v. Latvia, no 8550\/03, \u00a7\u00a7 54-55, 11 February 2014;Selmouni v. France [GC], no 25803\/94, \u00a7 95, ECHR 1999-V;Soering v. the United Kingdom, 7 July 1989, \u00a7 91, Series A no 161;Vu\u010dkovi\u0107 and Others v. Serbia (preliminary objection) [GC], nos. 17153\/11 and 29 others, \u00a7\u00a7 69-77, 25 March 2014;Z and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 29392\/95, \u00a7 73, ECHR 2001 V;Zeynep \u00d6zcan v. Turkey, no 45906\/99, \u00a7 43, 20 February 2007", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Preliminary objection dismissed (Article 35-1 - Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Six month period);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for family life;Respect for private life);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for family life;Respect for private life);Violation of Article 13+3 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 3 - Prohibition of torture);Violation of Article 13+5 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 5 - Right to liberty and security);Violation of Article 13+8 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life);Violation of Article 13+3 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 3 - Prohibition of torture);Violation of Article 13+8 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "FALSE", "judges": "", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0223JUD004488309" }, "283": { "webcast_id": "4488309_23062015", "hearing_date": "2015-06-23 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Nasr and Ghali v. Italy (no. 44883\/09)", "hearing_type": "Chamber hearing", "appno": "44883\/09", "case_id": "001-113123", "case_name": "NASR AND GHALI v. ITALY", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-113123", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "2011-11-22 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "BAUCCIO L. ; SCAMBIA C.", "respondent": "ITA", "articles": "3;6;6-1;8;8-1;8-2;13", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Communicated", "separate_opinion": "FALSE", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "284": { "webcast_id": "2026112_17062015", "hearing_date": "2015-06-17 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Baka v. Hungary (no. 20261\/12)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "20261\/12", "case_id": "001-163113", "case_name": "CASE OF BAKA v. HUNGARY", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-163113", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2016-06-23 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Articles 47 (2), 48 (1) and (3) and 50 (3) of the 1949 Constitution ; Fundamental Law of Hungary of 25 April 2011 ; Section 11 (2) of the Transitional Provisions of the Fundamental Law of Hungary (2011, entered into force on 1 January 2012) ; Sections 62, 69, 73 and 74\/A (1) of the Organisation and Administration of the Courts Act (Act LXVI of 1997) ; Section 185 of the Organisation and Administration of the Courts Act (Act CLXI of 2011, entered into force on 1 January 2012) ; Section 45 (1) of Parliamentary decision 46\/1994. (IX.30.) OGY on the Rules of Parliament", "represented_by": "CECH A.", "respondent": "HUN", "articles": "6;6-1;10;10-1;10-2;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Akta\u015f v. Turkey, no. 24351\/94, \u00a7 79, ECHR 2003 V (extracts);Albayrak v. Turkey, no. 38406\/97, \u00a7\u00a7 40-42, 31 January 2008;Animal Defenders International v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 48876\/08 \u00a7 108, ECHR 2013 (extracts);Association Ekin v. France, no. 39288\/98, \u00a7 61, ECHR 2001 VIII;Axel Springer AG v. Germany [GC], no. 39954\/08, \u00a7 90, 7 February 2012;Bayer v. Germany, no. 8453\/04, \u00a7 38, 16 July 2009;Bochan v. Ukraine (no. 2) [GC], no. 22251\/08, \u00a7 42, ECHR 2015;Boulois v. Luxembourg [GC], no. 37575\/04, \u00a7\u00a7 90-91, ECHR 2012;Boyle and Rice v. the United Kingdom, 27 April 1988, \u00a7 52, Series A no. 131;Castells v. Spain, 23 April 1992, \u00a7\u00a7 47-48, Series A no. 236;Colombani and Others v. France, no. 51279\/99, \u00a7 66, ECHR 2002 V;Creang\u0103 v. Romania [GC], no. 29226\/03, \u00a7\u00a7 88-90, 23 February 2012;D.H. and Others v. the Czech Republic [GC], no. 57325\/00, \u00a7\u00a7 177-179, ECHR 2007 IV;Delfi AS v. Estonia [GC], no. 64569\/09, \u00a7 131, ECHR 2015;Di Giovanni v. Italy, no. 51160\/06, 9 July 2013;Dzhidzheva-Trendafilova v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 12628\/09, 9 October 2012;Efendiyeva v. Azerbaijan, no. 31556\/03, \u00a7 59, 25 October 2007;El Masri v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia [GC], no. 39630\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 151-152, ECHR 2012;Fadeyeva v. Russia, no. 55723\/00, \u00a7 79, ECHR 2005 IV;Fruni v. Slovakia, no. 8014\/07, \u00a7 145, 21 June 2011;G. v. Finland, no. 33173\/05, 27 January 2009;Golder v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1975, \u00a7 36, Series A no. 18;Guja v. Moldova [GC], no. 14277\/04, \u00a7 52, ECHR 2008;Handyside v. the United Kingdom, 7 December 1976, Series A no. 24;Harabin v. Slovakia, no. 58688\/11, 20 November 2012;Henryk Urban and Ryszard Urban v. Poland, no. 23614\/08, \u00a7 53, 30 November 2010;Ivanova v. Bulgaria, no. 52435\/99, \u00a7\u00a7 83-84, 12 April 2007;Juri\u010di\u0107 v. Croatia, no. 58222\/09, 26 July 2011;Karaduman and Tando\u011fan v. Turkey, nos. 41296\/04 and 41298\/04, \u00a7 9, 3 June 2008;Kayasu v. Turkey, nos. 64119\/00 and 76292\/01, 13 November 2008;Kudeshkina v. Russia, no. 29492\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 79-100, 26 February 2009;Kuznetsov and Others v. Russia, no. 184\/02, \u00a7 87, 11 January 2007;Kyprianou v. Cyprus [GC], no. 73797\/01, \u00a7\u00a7 171 and 181, ECHR 2005 XIII;Lindon, Otchakovsky-Laurens and July v. France [GC], nos. 21279\/02 and 36448\/02, \u00a7 46, ECHR 2007-IV;Lombardi Vallauri v. Italy, no. 39128\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 45-56, 20 October 2009;Makhmudov v. Russia, no. 35082\/04, \u00a7\u00a7 68-73, 26 July 2007;Mam\u00e8re v. France, no. 12697\/03, \u00a7\u00a7 23-24, ECHR 2006 XIII;Markovic and Others v. Italy [GC], no. 1398\/03, \u00a7 99, ECHR 2006 XIV;Morice v. France [GC], no. 29369\/10, 23 April 2015;Nachova and Others v. Bulgaria [GC], nos. 43577\/98 and 43579\/98, \u00a7 147, ECHR 2005-VII;Nedelcho Popov v. Bulgaria, no. 61360\/00, 22 November 2007;Ohneberg v. Austria, no. 10781\/08, \u00a7 25, 18 September 2012;Oleksandr Volkov v. Ukraine, no. 21722\/11, ECHR 2013;Oluji\u0107 v. Croatia, no. 22330\/05, 5 February 2009;\u00d6zp\u0131nar v. Turkey, no. 20999\/04, \u00a7 30, 19 October 2010;Pellegrin v. France [GC], no. 28541\/95, ECHR 1999 VIII;Perin\u00e7ek v. Switzerland [GC], no. 27510\/08, \u00a7 196, ECHR 2015 (extracts);Pitkevich v. Russia (dec.), no. 47936\/99, 8 February 2001;Poyraz v. Turkey, no. 15966\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 55-57, 7 December 2010;Roche v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 32555\/96, \u00a7 119, ECHR 2005 X;Roland Dumas v. France, no. 34875\/07, \u00a7 43, 15 July 2010;Savino and Others v. Italy, nos. 17214\/05, 20329\/05 and 42113\/04, \u00a7\u00a7 68-69, 28 April 2009;Stanev v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 36760\/06, \u00a7 230, ECHR 2012;Steel and Morris v. the United Kingdom, no. 68416\/01, \u00a7 95, ECHR 2005-II;Stran Greek Refineries and Stratis Andreadis v. Greece, 9 December 1994, \u00a7\u00a7 47-50, Series A no. 301 B;S\u00fckut v. Turkey (dec.), no. 59773\/00, 11 September 2007;S\u00fcrek v. Turkey (no. 1) [GC], no. 26682\/95, \u00a7 61, ECHR 1999-IV;Tsanova Gecheva v. Bulgaria, no. 43800\/12, 15 September 2015;Vilho Eskelinen and Others v. Finland [GC], no. 63235\/00, ECHR 2007 II;Visti\u0146\u0161 and Perepjolkins v. Latvia [GC], no. 71243\/01, \u00a7 99, 25 October 2012;Vogt v. Germany, 26 September 1995, \u00a7 53, Series A no. 323;Wille v. Liechtenstein [GC], no. 28396\/95, ECHR 1999 VII;Zander v. Sweden, 25 November 1993, \u00a7 24, Series A no. 279 B\n\n", "external_sources": "Point 20 of the Basic Principles on the Independence of the Judiciary adopted by the Seventh United Nations Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders (Milan, 1985) and endorsed by UN General Assembly Resolutions 40\/32 of 29 November 1985 and 40\/146 of 13 December 1985;Paragraphs 1.3, 5.1 and 7.2 of the European Charter on the Statute for Judges (Strasbourg, 8-10 July 1998) (meeting organised under the auspices of the Council of Europe), endorsed by the Presidents of the Supreme Courts of Central and Eastern European countries (Kyiv, 12-4 October 1998), and again by judges and representatives from Ministries of Justice from 25 European countries (Lisbon, 8-10 April 1999);Paragraphs 59-60 of Opinion no. 1 (2001) of the Consultative Council of European Judges (CCJE) on standards concerning the independence of the judiciary and the irremovability of judges (23 November 2001);Opinion no. 3 (2002) of the Consultative Council of European Judges (CCJE) on the principles and rules governing judges\u2019 professional conduct, in particular ethics, incompatible behaviour and impartiality (19 November 2002);General Comment no. 32 on Article 14 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (Right to equality before courts and tribunals and to a fair trial) of the United Nations Human Rights Committee (23 August 2007);Paragraphs 3, 6 and 9 of the Magna Carta of Judges (Fundamental Principles) adopted by the Consultative Council of European Judges (CCJE) (November 2010);Opinion on the Legal Status and Remuneration of Judges Act (Act CLXII of 2011) and the Organisation and Administration of the Courts Act (Act CLXI of 2011), adopted by the Venice Commission at its 90th Plenary Session (Venice, 16-17 March 2012, CDL-AD(2012)001);Report on the \u201cRequest for the opening of a monitoring procedure in respect of Hungary\u201d adopted by the Committee on the Honouring of Obligations and Commitments by the Member States (Monitoring Committee) of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (10 June 2013)", "conclusion": "Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Access to court;Civil rights and obligations;Determination (civil));Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression -{General} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression);Pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Ale\u0161 Pejchal;Andr\u00e1s Baka;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Dmitry Dedov;Egidijus K\u016bris;Erik M\u00f8se;Ganna Yudkivska;Guido Raimondi;Helen Keller;Helena J\u00e4derblom;Jon Fridrik Kj\u00f8lbro;Julia Laffranque;Krzysztof Wojtyczek;Ledi Bianku;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Luis L\u00f3pez Guerra;Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska;Neboj\u0161a Vu\u010dini\u0107;Paul Lemmens;Paul Mahoney;Paulo Pinto De Albuquerque;Robert Spano;Vincent A. De Gaetano", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0623JUD002026112" }, "285": { "webcast_id": "2026112_17062015", "hearing_date": "2015-06-17 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Baka v. Hungary (no. 20261\/12)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "20261\/12", "case_id": "001-144139", "case_name": "CASE OF BAKA v. HUNGARY", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-144139", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 14, "document_date": "2014-05-27 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 3, "court": "5", "issue": "Section 74\/A(2) of the Organisation and Administration of the Courts Act (Act LXVI of 1997) ; Section 11(2) of the Transitional Provisions of the Fundamental Law of Hungary ; Organisation and Administration of the Courts Bill (no. T\/4743)", "represented_by": "CECH A.", "respondent": "HUN", "articles": "6;6-1;10;10-1;10-2;35;35-3;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Anheuser-Busch Inc. v. Portugal [GC], no. 73049\/01, \u00a7 64, ECHR 2007 I;Apay v. Turkey (dec.), no. 3964\/05, 11 December 2007;Ashingdane v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 28 May 1985, \u00a7 57, Series A no. 93;Boyle and Rice v. the United Kingdom, 27 April 1988, \u00a7 52, Series A no. 131;Dzhidzheva-Trendafilova v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 12628\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 42-50, 9 October 2012;Efendiyeva v. Azerbaijan, no. 31556\/03, \u00a7 59, 25 October 2007;Erkan v. Turkey (dec.), no. 29840\/03, 24 March 2005;G. v. Finland, no. 33173\/05, \u00a7 34, 27 January 2009;Golder v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 21 February 1975, \u00a7 36, Series A no. 18;Hans-Adam von Liechtenstein v. Germany [GC], no. 42527\/98, \u00a7 91, ECHR 2001-VIII;Harabin v. Slovakia (dec.), no. 62584\/00, 9 July 2002;Harabin v. Slovakia, no. 58688\/11, 20 November 2012;Juricic v. Croatia, no. 58222\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 53-57, 26 July 2011;Kayasu v. Turkey, nos. 64119\/00 and 76292\/01, \u00a7\u00a7 77-79, 13 November 2008;Kleyn and Others v. the Netherlands [GC], nos. 39343\/98, 39651\/98, 43147\/98 and 46664\/99, \u00a7 193, ECHR 2003-VI;Kudeshkina v. Russia, no. 29492\/05, \u00a7 79, 26 February 2009;Lombardi Vallauri v. Italy, no. 39128\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 45-56, 20 October 2009;Markovic and Others v. Italy [GC], no. 1398\/03, \u00a7 99, ECHR 2006 XIV;N.K.M. v. Hungary, no. 66529\/11, 14 May 2013;Nazsiz v. Turkey (dec.), no. 22412\/05, 26 May 2009;Nedelcho Popov v. Bulgaria, no. 61360\/00, \u00a7 32, 22 November 2007;Oleksandr Volkov v. Ukraine, no. 21722\/11, \u00a7\u00a7 87-91, 9 January 2013;Olujic v. Croatia, no. 22330\/05, 5 February 2009;Pellegrin v. France [GC], no. 28541\/95, \u00a7 66, ECHR 1999 VIII;Petrova and Chornobryvets v. Ukraine, nos. 6360\/04 and 16820\/04, \u00a7 15, 15 May 2008;Pitkevich v. Russia (dec.), no. 47936\/99, 8 February 2001;Poyraz v. Turkey, no. 15966\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 55-57, 7 December 2010;Sacilor-Lormines v. France, no. 65411\/01, ECHR 2006 XIII;Sayg\u0131l\u0131 and Seyman v. Turkey, no. 51041\/99, \u00a7\u00a7 24-25, 27 June 2006;Stafford v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 46295\/99, \u00a7 78, ECHR 2002-IV;Tosti v. Italy (dec.), no. 27791\/06, 12 May 2009;Vilho Eskelinen and Others v. Finland [GC], no. 63235\/00, ECHR 2007-II;Volkov v. Ukraine (dec.), no. 21722\/11, 18 October 2011;Wille v. Liechtenstein [GC], no. 28396\/95, \u00a7\u00a7 42-43, ECHR 1999 VII", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Article 35-3 - Ratione materiae);Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Access to court);Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression -{General} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression);Just satisfaction reserved", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Andr\u00e1s Baka;Egidijus K\u016bris;Guido Raimondi;Helena J\u00e4derblom;Jon Fridrik Kj\u00f8lbro;Neboj\u0161a Vu\u010dini\u0107;Robert Spano", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0527JUD002026112" }, "286": { "webcast_id": "2026112_17062015", "hearing_date": "2015-06-17 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Baka v. Hungary (no. 20261\/12)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "20261\/12", "case_id": "001-115532", "case_name": "BAKA v. HUNGARY", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-115532", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "2012-11-29 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "CECH A.", "respondent": "HUN", "articles": "10", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "", "separate_opinion": "FALSE", "judges": "Andr\u00e1s Baka", "ecli": "" }, "287": { "webcast_id": "587808_10062015", "hearing_date": "2015-06-10 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Armani Da Silva v. the United Kingdom (no. 5878\/08)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "5878\/08", "case_id": "001-161975", "case_name": "CASE OF ARMANI DA SILVA v. THE UNITED KINGDOM", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-161975", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 14, "document_date": "2016-03-30 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Offences under the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974\n\n\n", "represented_by": "WISTRICH H.", "respondent": "GBR", "articles": "2;2-1;35", "strasbourg_caselaw": "A. v. Croatia, no. 55164\/08, \u00a7 66, 14 October 2010;Akhmadov and Others v. Russia, no. 21586\/02, \u00a7 101, 14 November 2008;Ali and Ay\u015fe Duran v. Turkey, no. 42942\/02, \u00a7 66, 8 April 2008;Andronicou and Constantinou v. Cyprus, 9 October 1997, \u00a7 192, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997 VI;Av\u015far v. Turkey, no. 25657\/94, \u00a7\u00a7 393-395, ECHR 2001 VII (extracts);Brecknell v. the United Kingdom, no. 32457\/04, 27 November 2007;Caraher v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 24520\/94, ECHR 2000 I;Enukidze and Girgvliani v. Georgia, no. 25091\/07, \u00a7 277, 26 April 2011;Ergi v. Turkey, 28 July 1998, \u00a7 82, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 IV;Giuliani and Gaggio v. Italy [GC], no. 23458\/02, ECHR 2011 (extracts);Golubeva v. Russia, no. 1062\/03, \u00a7 102, 17 December 2009;G\u00fcl v. Turkey, no. 22676\/93, \u00a7\u00a7 82-89, 14 December 2000;G\u00fcle\u00e7 v. Turkey, 27 July 1998, \u00a7\u00a7 81-82, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 IV;G\u00fcrtekin and others v. Cyprus (dec.), nos. 60441\/13, 68206\/13 and 68667\/13, 11 March 2014;Hugh Jordan v. the United Kingdom, no. 24746\/94, 4 May 2001;\u0130lhan v. Turkey [GC], no. 22277\/93, \u00a7\u00a7 91-92, ECHR 2000-VII;Jaloud v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 47708\/08, \u00a7 186, ECHR 2014;Kasap and Others v. Turkey, no. 8656\/10, \u00a7 59, 14 January 2014;Kaya v. Turkey, 19 February 1998, Reports 1998-I;Kolevi v. Bulgaria, no. 1108\/02, \u00a7 201, 5 November 2009;Makaratzis v. Greece [GC], no. 50385\/99, \u00a7\u00a7 65-66, ECHR 2004 XI;Mastromatteo v. Italy [GC], no. 37703\/97, \u00a7\u00a7 89-90, ECHR 2002 VIII;McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, 27 September 1995, Series A no. 324;McKerr v. the United Kingdom, no. 28883\/95, \u00a7 129, ECHR 2001-III;Mileusni\u0107 and Mileusni\u0107-Espenheim v. Croatia, no. 66953\/09, \u00a7 66, 19 February 2015;Mustafa Tun\u00e7 and Fecire Tun\u00e7 v. Turkey [GC], no. 24014\/05, 14 April 2015;Nachova and Others v. Bulgaria [GC], nos. 43577\/98 and 43579\/98, \u00a7 160, ECHR 2005 VII;O\u011fur v. Turkey [GC], no. 21594\/93, \u00a7\u00a7 91-92, ECHR 1999 III;Ol\u00e1h v. Hungary (dec.), 56558\/00, 14 September 2004;\u00d6nery\u0131ld\u0131z v. Turkey [GC], no. 48939\/99, ECHR 2004 XII;Opuz v. Turkey, no. 33401\/02, \u00a7 150, ECHR 2009;Perk v. Turkey, no. 50739\/99, \u00a7 60, 28 March 2006;Ramsahai and Others v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 52391\/99, ECHR 2007 II;Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986\/93, \u00a7 106, ECHR 2000-VII;\u0160ilih v. Slovenia [GC], no. 71463\/01, 9 April 2009;Suleymanova v. Russia, no. 9191\/06, \u00a7 85, 12 May 2010;Tanr\u0131kulu v. Turkey [GC], no. 23763\/94, \u00a7 109, ECHR 1999-IV;Velcea and Maz\u0103re v. Romania, no. 64301\/01, 1 December 2009;Wasilewska and Ka\u0142ucka v. Poland, nos. 28975\/04 and 33406\/04, \u00a7 52, 23 February 2010;Ya\u015fa v. Turkey, 2 September 1998, \u00a7\u00a7 102-104, Reports 1998-VI;Zavoloka v. Latvia, no. 58447\/00, \u00a7 34, 7 July 2009", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Remainder inadmissible;No violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Branko Lubarda;Dean Spielmann;Dmitry Dedov;George Nicolaou;Guido Raimondi;Ineta Ziemele;Josep Casadevall;Krzysztof Wojtyczek;Ledi Bianku;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Luis L\u00f3pez Guerra;Mark Villiger;Neboj\u0161a Vu\u010dini\u0107;P\u00e4ivi Hirvel\u00e4;Paul Mahoney;Vincent A. De Gaetano;Yonko Grozev;Zdravka Kalaydjieva", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0330JUD000587808" }, "288": { "webcast_id": "587808_10062015", "hearing_date": "2015-06-10 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Armani Da Silva v. the United Kingdom (no. 5878\/08)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "5878\/08", "case_id": "001-111334", "case_name": "ARMANI DA SILVA v. THE UNITED KINGDOM", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-111334", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "2010-09-28 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "BIRNBERG PEIRCE & PARTNERS", "respondent": "GBR", "articles": "2;13", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Communicated", "separate_opinion": "FALSE", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "289": { "webcast_id": "6264910_03062015", "hearing_date": "2015-06-03 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Izzettin Dogan and Others v. Turkey (no. 62649\/10) ", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "62649\/10", "case_id": "001-162697", "case_name": "CASE OF \u0130ZZETT\u0130N DO\u011eAN AND OTHERS v. TURKEY", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-162697", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2016-04-26 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Law no. 677 ; Section 1 of Law no. 633 ; Articles 2 and 24 of the Turkish Constitution", "represented_by": "SOFUOGLU N. ; SAVASIR I. ; TOPCU S. ; KARA F.; SUCUOGLU GONEN J. ; SAHBAZ I. ; AYDIN M.", "respondent": "TUR", "articles": "9;9-1;9-2;14;14+9-1;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Abdulaziz, Cabales and Balkandali v. the United Kingdom, 28 May 1985, \u00a7 71, Series A no. 94;Arrowsmith v. the United Kingdom, no. 7050\/75, Commission\u2019s report of 12 October 1978, DR 19;\u00c1satr\u00faarf\u00e9lagid v. Iceland, no. 22897\/08, 18 September 2012;Association Cultuelle du Temple Pyramide v. France, no. 50471\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 34 35, 31 January 2013;Association des Chevaliers du Lotus d\u2019Or v. France, no. 50615\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 33 34, 31 January 2013;Association Les T\u00e9moins de J\u00e9hovah v. France, no. 8916\/05, \u00a7 53, 30 June 2011;Bayatyan v. Armenia [GC], no. 23459\/03, ECHR 2011;Buscarini and Others v. San Marino [GC], no. 24645\/94, \u00a7 34, ECHR 1999-I;Campbell and Cosans v. the United Kingdom, 25 February 1982, \u00a7 36, Series A no. 48;Carson and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 42184\/05, \u00a7 61, ECHR 2010;Case \u201crelating to certain aspects of the laws on the use of languages in education in Belgium\u201d (merits), 23 July 1968, p. 34, \u00a7 9, Series A no. 6;Cha\u2019are Shalom Ve Tsedek v. France [GC], no. 27417\/95, ECHR 2000 VII;Cumhuriyet\u00e7i E\u011fitim ve K\u00fclt\u00fcr Merkezi Vakfi v. Turkey, no. 32093\/10, 2 December 2014;D.H. and Others v. the Czech Republic [GC], no. 57325\/00, \u00a7 175, ECHR 2007 IV;Darby v. Sweden, 23 October 1990, \u00a7 45, Series A no. 187;Delfi AS v. Estonia [GC], no. 64569\/09, \u00a7 120, ECHR 2015;Dogru v. France, no. 27058\/05, \u00a7 72, 4 December 2008;E.B. v. France [GC], no. 43546\/02, \u00a7 48, 22 January 2008;Eweida and Others v. the United Kingdom, nos. 48420\/10, 59842\/10, 51671\/10 and 36516\/10, ECHR 2013;Fern\u00e1ndez Mart\u00ednez v. Spain [GC], no. 56030\/07, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Folger\u00f8 and Others v. Norway [GC], no. 15472\/02, ECHR 2007 III;Gorzelik and Others v. Poland [GC], no. 44158\/98, \u00a7 92, ECHR 2004 I;H\u00e4m\u00e4l\u00e4inen v. Finland [GC], no. 37359\/09, \u00a7 107, ECHR 2014;Hasan and Chaush v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 30985\/96, ECHR 2000 XI;Hasan and Eylem Zengin v. Turkey, no. 1448\/04, \u00a7 66, 9 October 2007;Kala\u00e7 v. Turkey, 1 July 1997, \u00a7 27, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997 IV;Kimlya and Others v. Russia, nos. 76836\/01 and 32782\/03, \u00a7 86, ECHR 2009;Kokkinakis v. Greece, 25 May 1993, Series A no. 260-A;Kuri\u0107 and Others v. Slovenia [GC], no. 26828\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 388-389, ECHR 2012 (extracts);Leyla \u015eahin v. Turkey [GC], no. 44774\/98, \u00a7\u00a7 105-121, ECHR 2005-XI;Magyar Kereszt\u00e9ny Mennonita Egyh\u00e1z and Others v. Hungary, nos. 70945\/11, 23611\/12, 26998\/12, 41150\/12, 41155\/12, 41463\/12, 41553\/12, 54977\/12 and 56581\/12, \u00a7 108, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Maktouf and Damjanovi\u0107 v. Bosnia and Herzegovina [GC], nos. 2312\/08 and 34179\/08, \u00a7 94, ECHR 2013 (extracts);Manoussakis and Others v. Greece, 26 September 1996, Reports 1996 IV;Mansur Yal\u00e7\u0131n and Others v. Turkey, no. 21163\/11, \u00a7\u00a7 70-74, 16 September 2014;Metropolitan Church of Bessarabia and Others v. Moldova, no. 45701\/99, ECHR 2001-XII;Miro\u013cubovs and Others v. Latvia, no. 798\/05, \u00a7 90, 15 September 2009;Moscow Branch of the Salvation Army v. Russia, no. 72881\/01, ECHR 2006 XI;Mouvement ra\u00eblien suisse v. Switzerland [GC], no. 16354\/06, \u00a7 50, ECHR 2012 (extracts);Nachova and Others v. Bulgaria [GC], nos. 43577\/98 and 43579\/98, \u00a7 145, ECHR 2005 VII;Perry v. Latvia, no. 30273\/03, \u00a7 55, 8 November 2007;Pretty v. the United Kingdom, no. 2346\/02, \u00a7 82, ECHR 2002 III;Religionsgemeinschaft der Zeugen Jehovas and Others v. Austria, no. 40825\/98, 31 July 2008;S.A.S. v. France [GC], no. 43835\/11, \u00a7 55, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Savez crkava \u201cRije\u010d \u017eivota\u201d and Others v. Croatia, no. 7798\/08, 9 December 2010;Serif v. Greece, no. 38178\/97, \u00a7 53, ECHR 1999-IX;Sinan I\u015f\u0131k v. Turkey, no. 21924\/05, \u00a7 46, ECHR 2010;Sindicatul \u201cP\u0103storul cel Bun\u201d v. Romania [GC], no. 2330\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 136-138, ECHR 2013 (extracts);Stec and Others v. the United Kingdom (dec.) [GC], nos. 65731\/01 and 65900\/01, \u00a7 40, ECHR 2005-X;The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. the United Kingdom, no. 7552\/09, \u00a7 34, 4 March 2014;Vallianatos and Others v. Greece [GC], nos. 29381\/09 and 32684\/09, ECHR 2013 (extracts);Valsamis v. Greece, 18 December 1996, \u00a7 27, Reports 1996 VI;X and Others v. Austria [GC], no. 19010\/07, \u00a7 94, ECHR 2013;Young, James and Webster v. the United Kingdom, 13 August 1981, \u00a7 63, Series A no. 44;\u017ddanoka v. Latvia [GC], no. 58278\/00, \u00a7 96, ECHR 2006 IV", "external_sources": "\u201cJoint Guidelines on the Legal Personality of Religious or Belief Communities\u201d", "conclusion": "Violation of Article 9 - Freedom of thought conscience and religion (Article 9-1 - Freedom of religion);Violation of Article 14+9-1 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article 9-1 - Freedom of religion;Article 9 - Freedom of thought conscience and religion);Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Andr\u00e1s Saj\u00f3;Andr\u00e9 Potocki;Dean Spielmann;Guido Raimondi;Helen Keller;Johannes Silvis;Jon Fridrik Kj\u00f8lbro;Josep Casadevall;Julia Laffranque;Ledi Bianku;Mark Villiger;Paul Lemmens;Robert Spano;Yonko Grozev", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0426JUD006264910" }, "290": { "webcast_id": "4339509_20052015", "hearing_date": "2015-05-20 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "de Tommaso v. Italy (no. 43395\/09) ", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "43395\/09", "case_id": "001-171804", "case_name": "CASE OF DE TOMMASO v. ITALY", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-171804", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2017-02-23 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Act no. 1423 of 27 December 1956, provides for the imposition of preventive measures against \u201cpersons presenting a danger for security and public morality\u201d. ; Section 2 ter of Act no. 575\/1965 referring to Mafia-type organisations", "represented_by": "CONTICCHIO D.", "respondent": "ITA", "articles": "5;5-1;6;6-1;13;13+P4-2-1;35;37;37-1-c;41;P4-2;P4-2-1;P4-2-3", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Aerts v. Belgium, 30 July 1998, \u00a7 59, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-V;Aksoy v. Turkey, 18 December 1996, \u00a7 95, Reports 1996-VI;Aleksandr Nikolayevich Dikiy v. Ukraine (dec.), no. 2399\/12, 16 December 2014;Alexandre v. Portugal, no. 33197\/09, \u00a7 51, 20 November 2012;An\u0111elkovi\u0107 v. Serbia, no. 1401\/08, \u00a7 24, 9 April 2013;Austin and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 39692\/09, 40713\/09 and 41008\/09, ECHR 2012;Battista v. Italy, no. 43978\/09, \u00a7 37, ECHR 2014;Baudoin v. France, no. 35935\/03, \u00a7 78, 18 November 2010;Baumann v. France, no. 33592\/96, \u00a7 61, ECHR 2001-V;Bocellari and Rizza v. Italy, no. 399\/02, 13 November 2007;Bochan v. Ukraine (no. 2) [GC], no. 22251\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 64-65, ECHR 2015;Bongiorno and Others v. Italy, no. 4514\/07, 5 January 2010;Boulois v. Luxembourg [GC], no. 37575\/04, \u00a7 90, ECHR 2012;Boyle and Rice v. the United Kingdom, 27 April 1988, \u00a7 54, Series A no. 131;B\u00fcy\u00fckda\u011f v. Turkey, no. 28340\/95, \u00a7 64, 21 December 2000;Buzadji v. the Republic of Moldova [GC], no. 23755\/07, \u00a7 104, ECHR 2016;Bystrowski v. Poland, no. 15476\/02, \u00a7 36, 13 September 2011;Capitani and Campanella v. Italy, no. 24920\/07, 17 May 2011;Centro Europa 7 S.r.l. and Di Stefano v. Italy [GC], no. 38433\/09, ECHR 2012;Ciobanu v. Romania and Italy, no. 4509\/08, \u00a7 22, 9 July 2013;Costello-Roberts v. the United Kingdom, 25 March 1993, \u00a7 40, Series A no. 247-C;Danov v. Bulgaria, no. 56796\/00, \u00a7\u00a7 61 and 80, 26 October 2006;Donadze v. Georgia, no. 74644\/01, \u00a7\u00a7 30-31, 7 March 2006;Dulaurans v. France, no. 34553\/97, \u00a7\u00a7 33-34 and 38, 21 March 2000;Enea v. Italy ([GC], no. 74912\/01, ECHR 2009;Frascati v. Italy (dec.), no. 5382\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 21-22, 13 May 2014;Ganci v. Italy, no. 41576\/98, \u00a7\u00a7 20-26, ECHR 2003 XI;Garc\u00eda Ruiz v. Spain [GC], no. 30544\/96, \u00a7 28, ECHR 1999-I;G\u00fclmez v. Turkey, no. 16330\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 27 31, 20 May 2008;Guzzardi v. Italy, 6 November 1980, Series A no. 39;Ielcean v. Romania (dec.), no. 76048\/11, \u00a7\u00a7 18-19, 7 October 2014;Jussila v. Finland [GC], no. 73053\/01, ECHR 2006 XIV;Khamidov v. Russia, no. 72118\/01, \u00a7 170, 15 November 2007;Khlyustov v. Russia, no. 28975\/05, 11 July 2013;Kokkinakis v. Greece, 25 May 1993, \u00a7 40, Series A no. 260-A;Kud\u0142a v. Poland [GC], no. 30210\/96, \u00a7 152, ECHR 2000-XI;Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772\/95, ECHR 2000 IV;Laidin v. France (no. 2), no. 39282\/98, \u00a7 76, 7 January 2003;Leander v. Sweden, 26 March 1987, \u00a7 77, Series A no. 116;Leone v. Italy, no. 30506\/07, 2 February 2010;Maestri v. Italy [GC], no. 39748\/98, \u00a7 30, ECHR 2004-I;Mancini v. Italy, no. 44955\/98, \u00a7 17, ECHR 2001 IX;Medvedyev and Others v. France [GC], no. 3394\/03, \u00a7 73, ECHR 2010;Mennitto v. Italy [GC], no. 33804\/96, \u00a7 23, ECHR 2000 X;Micallef v. Malta [GC], no. 17056\/06, ECHR 2009;Monno v. Italy (dec.), no. 18675\/09, 8 October 2013;Musumeci v. Italy, no. 33695\/96, \u00a7 36, 11 January 2005;N.C. v. Italy, no. 24952\/94, \u00a7 33, 11 January 2001;Nada v. Switzerland [GC], no. 10593\/08, ECHR 2012;Nikolova v. Bulgaria (no. 2), no. 40896\/98, \u00a7\u00a7 60 and 74, 30 September 2004;Ninescu v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 47306\/07, \u00a7 53, 15 July 2014;Pasquale Miele v. Italy (dec.), no. 37262\/03, 16 September 2014;Perez v. France [GC], no. 47287\/99, \u00a7 82, ECHR 2004-I;Perre and Others v. Italy, no. 1905\/05, 8 July 2008;Pocius v. Lithuania, no. 35601\/04, \u00a7 43, 6 July 2010;Prencipe v. Monaco, no. 43376\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 57 62, 16 July 2009;Pubblicit\u00e0 Grafiche Perri S.R.L v. Italy (dec.), no. 30746\/03, 14 October 2014;Raimondo v. Italy, 22 February 1994, Series A no. 281 A;Ramazan Ta\u015f v. Turkey (dec.), no. 5382\/10, 14 October 2014;Rekv\u00e9nyi v. Hungary [GC], no. 25390\/94, ECHR 1999-III;Riener v. Bulgaria, no. 46343\/99, 23 May 2006;Rotaru v. Romania [GC], no. 28341\/95, \u00a7 52, ECHR 2000-V;RTBF v. Belgium, no. 50084\/06, \u00a7 104, ECHR 2011;Silver and Others v. the United Kingdom, 25 March 1983, \u00a7 88, Series A no. 61;Stanev v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 36760\/06, \u00a7 115, ECHR 2012;Stegarescu and Bahrin v. Portugal, no. 46194\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 37-38, 6 April 2010;Sunday Times v. the United Kingdom (no. 1), 26 April 1979, \u00a7 49, Series A no. 30;T.P. and K.M. v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 28945\/95, \u00a7 107, ECHR 2001-V;Tahsin Acar v. Turkey (preliminary objections) [GC], no. 26307\/95, ECHR 2003-VI;Tayfur Tun\u00e7 and Others v. Turkey (dec.), no. 22373\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 20-21, 24 March 2015;Villa v. Italy, no. 19675\/06, 20 April 2010;Vito Sante Santoro v. Italy, no. 36681\/97, ECHR 2004 VI;Vogt v. Germany, 26 September 1995, \u00a7 48, Series A no. 323;X v. Latvia [GC], no. 27853\/09, \u00a7 58, ECHR 2013", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 2 of Protocol No. 4 - Freedom of movement-{general} (Article 2 para. 1 of Protocol No. 4 - Freedom of movement);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Civil rights and obligations;Fair hearing);No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Civil rights and obligations;Fair hearing);No violation of Article 13+P4-2-1 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 2 para. 1 of Protocol No. 4 - Freedom of movement;Article 2 of Protocol No. 4 - Freedom of movement-{general});Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Andr\u00e1s Saj\u00f3;Dmitry Dedov;Egidijus K\u016bris;Guido Raimondi;Helen Keller;J\u00e1n \u0160ikuta;Jon Fridrik Kj\u00f8lbro;Josep Casadevall;Kristina Pardalos;Ledi Bianku;Mark Villiger;Neboj\u0161a Vu\u010dini\u0107;Paulo Pinto De Albuquerque;Robert Spano;Ksenija Turkovi\u0107", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0223JUD004339509" }, "291": { "webcast_id": "3342710_19052015", "hearing_date": "2015-05-19 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Gouarre Patte v. Andorra (no. 33427\/10)", "hearing_type": "Chamber hearing", "appno": "33427\/10", "case_id": "001-160073", "case_name": "CASE OF GOUARR\u00c9 PATTE v. ANDORRA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-160073", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2016-01-12 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 3, "court": "6", "issue": "\n", "represented_by": "BELLERA GRACIA M.", "respondent": "AND", "articles": "7;7-1;13;13+7-1;35;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Al-Jedda v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 27021\/08, ECHR 2011;Gardel v. France, no 16428\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 40 and ss. ECHR 2009;J\u0117\u010dius v. Lithuania, no 34578\/97, ECHR 2000 IX;Scoppola v. Italy, no 50550\/06, 10 June 2008;Tsirlis and Kouloumpas v. Greece, 29 May 1997, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997 III;Vanyan v. Russia, n 53203\/99, \u00a7 56, 15 December 2005;X v. Federal Republic of Germany, no 7900\/77, decision of the Commission of 6 March 1978, Decisions and Reports (DR) 13, pp. 70-72", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 7 - No punishment without law (Article 7-1 - Retroactivity);Violation of Article 13+7-1 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 7 - No punishment without law;Article 7-1 - Retroactivity);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0112JUD003342710" }, "292": { "webcast_id": "3342710_19052015", "hearing_date": "2015-05-19 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Gouarre Patte v. Andorra (no. 33427\/10)", "hearing_type": "Chamber hearing", "appno": "33427\/10", "case_id": "001-113072", "case_name": "GOUARRE PATTE v. ANDORRA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-113072", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "2011-05-23 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "BELLERA GRACIA M.", "respondent": "AND", "articles": "7;13", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Communicated", "separate_opinion": "FALSE", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "293": { "webcast_id": "5692508_13052015", "hearing_date": "2015-05-13 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "B\u00e9dat v. Switzerland (no. 56925\/08)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "56925\/08", "case_id": "001-161898", "case_name": "CASE OF B\u00c9DAT v. SWITZERLAND", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-161898", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 14, "document_date": "2016-03-29 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Article 293 of the Swiss Criminal Code ; Code of Criminal Procedure of the Canton of Vaud", "represented_by": "PONCET C. ; HOFFMANN D.", "respondent": "CHE", "articles": "6;6-1;6-2;8;8-1;10;10-1;10-2", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Ageyevy v. Russia, no. 7075\/10, \u00a7\u00a7 224-225, 18 April 2013;Armonien\u0117 v. Lithuania, no. 36919\/02, \u00a7 36, 25 November 2008;Axel Springer AG v. Germany [GC], no. 39954\/08, ECHR 2012;Bladet Troms\u00f8 and Stensaas v. Norway [GC], no. 21980\/93, \u00a7 62, ECHR 1999 III;Campos D\u00e2maso v. Portugal, no. 17107\/05, 24 April 2008;Castells v. Spain, 23 April 1992, \u00a7 46, Series A no. 236;Chauvy and Others v. France, no. 64915\/01, \u00a7 70, ECHR 2004 VI;Couderc and Hachette Filipacchi Associ\u00e9s v. France [GC], no. 40454\/07, \u00a7 91, 10 November 2015;Craxi v. Italy (no. 2), no. 25337\/94, \u00a7 73, 17 July 2003;De Haes and Gijsels v. Belgium, 24 February 1997, \u00a7 37, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-I;Dupuis and Others v. France, no. 1914\/02, \u00a7 24, 7 June 2007;E.K. v. Turkey, no. 28496\/95, \u00a7\u00a7 79-80, 7 February 2002;Egeland and Hanseid v. Norway, no. 34438\/04, \u00a7 62, 16 April 2009;Flinkkil\u00e4 and Others v. Finland, no. 25576\/04, \u00a7 75, 6 April 2010;Fressoz and Roire v. France [GC], no. 29183\/95, ECHR 1999 I;Gouveia Gomes Fernandes and Freitas e Costa v. Portugal, no. 1529\/08, \u00a7 47, 29 March 2011;Hachette Filipacchi Associ\u00e9s (ICI PARIS) v. France, no. 12268\/03, 23 July 2009;Haldimann and Others v. Switzerland, no. 21830\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 54 and 55, ECHR 2015;Handyside v. the United Kingdom, 7 December 1976, Series A no. 24;Incal v. Turkey, 9 June 1998, \u00a7 54, Reports of Judgements and Decisions 1998-IV;Laranjeira Marques da Silva v. Portugal, no. 16983\/06, \u00a7 51, 19 January 2010;Leempoel & S.A. ED. Cin\u00e9 Revue v. Belgium, no. 64772\/01, \u00a7 72, 9 November 2006;Lehideux and Isorni v. France, 23 September 1998, \u00a7 57, Reports of Judgements and Decisions 1998-VII;Lindon, Otchakovsky-Laurens and July v. France [GC], nos. 21279\/02 and 36448\/02, \u00a7 46, ECHR 2007-IV;MGN Limited v. the United Kingdom, no. 39401\/04, 18 January 2011;Morice v. France ([GC], no. 29369\/10, 23 April 2015;Mosley v. the United Kingdom, no. 48009\/08, 10 May 2011;Ormanni v. Italy, no. 30278\/04, \u00a7 59, 17 July 2007;Otegi Mondragon v. Spain, no. 2034\/07, 15 March 2011, \u00a7 58, ECHR 2011;\u00d6zt\u00fcrk v. Turkey [GC], no. 22479\/93, 28 September 1999, \u00a7 66, ECHR 1999-VI;Palomo S\u00e1nchez and Others v. Spain [GC], nos. 28955\/06, 28957\/06, 28959\/06 and 28964\/06, ECHR 2011;Paturel v. France, no. 54968\/00, \u00a7 42, 22 December 2005;Pentik\u00e4inen v. Finland [GC], no. 11882\/10, \u00a7 87, ECHR 2015;Perna v. Italy [GC], no. 48898\/99, \u00a7 39, ECHR 2003 V;Pinto Coelho v. Portugal, no. 28439\/08, \u00a7 33, 28 June 2011;Polanco Torres and Movilla Polanco v. Spain, no. 34147\/06 \u00a7 40, 21 September 2010;Prager and Oberschlick v. Austria, 26 April 1995, \u00a7 38, Series A no. 313;Reklos and Davourlis v. Greece, no. 1234\/05, \u00a7 35, 15 January 2009;Roland Dumas v. France, no. 34875\/07, \u00a7 43, 15 July 2010;S. and Marper v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 30562\/04 and 30566\/04, \u00a7 66, ECHR 2008;Saaristo and Others v. Finland, no. 184\/06, \u00a7 61, 12 October 2010;Sch\u00fcssel v. Austria (dec.), no. 42409\/98, 21 February 2002;Soci\u00e9t\u00e9 Prisma Presse v. France (dec.), nos. 66910\/01 and 71612\/01, 1 July 2003;S\u00f6derman v. Sweden [GC], no. 5786\/08, \u00a7 78, ECHR 2013;Stoll v. Switzerland [GC], no. 69698\/01, ECHR 2007-V;S\u00fcrek v. Turkey (no. 1) [GC], no. 26682\/95, \u00a7 61, ECHR 1999-IV;Thoma v. Luxembourg, no. 38432\/97, ECHR 2001-III;Timciuc v. Romania (dec.), no. 28999\/03, \u00a7 144, 12 October 2010;Tourancheau and July v. France, no. 53886\/00, 24 November 2005;Von Hannover v. Germany, no. 59320\/00, ECHR 2004 VI;Von Hannover v. Germany (no. 2) [GC], nos. 40660\/08 and 60641\/08, ECHR 2012;Worm v. Austria, 29 August 1997, \u00a7 50, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997 V;X and Y v. the Netherlands, 26 March 1985, \u00a7 23, Series A no. 91", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "No violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression -{General} (Article 10-1 - Freedom to impart information;Freedom to receive information)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Ale\u0161 Pejchal;Andr\u00e1s Saj\u00f3;Dean Spielmann;Egidijus K\u016bris;Elisabeth Steiner;Ganna Yudkivska;Guido Raimondi;Helen Keller;Josep Casadevall;Julia Laffranque;Khanlar Hajiyev;Kristina Pardalos;Krzysztof Wojtyczek;Luis L\u00f3pez Guerra;Mark Villiger;Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska;Neboj\u0161a Vu\u010dini\u0107;P\u00e4ivi Hirvel\u00e4;Paul Lemmens;Paul Mahoney;Robert Spano;Vincent A. De Gaetano", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0329JUD005692508" }, "294": { "webcast_id": "5692508_13052015", "hearing_date": "2015-05-13 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "B\u00e9dat v. Switzerland (no. 56925\/08)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "56925\/08", "case_id": "001-145457", "case_name": "CASE OF A.B. v. SWITZERLAND", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-145457", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2014-07-01 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 3, "court": "5", "issue": "", "represented_by": "PONCET C.", "respondent": "CHE", "articles": "10;10-1;10-2", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Ageyevy v. Russia, no 7075\/10, \u00a7\u00a7 224-225, 18 April 2013;Animal Defenders International v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 48876\/08, \u00a7 100, ECHR 2013;Axel Springer AG v. Germany [GC], no 39954\/08, \u00a7 108, 7 February 2012;Barthold v. Germany, 25 March 1985, \u00a7 58, Series A no 90;Bladet Troms\u00f8 and Stensaas v. Norway [GC], no 21980\/93, \u00a7 62, ECHR 1999 III;Campos D\u00e2maso v. Portugal, no 17107\/05, \u00a7 35, 24 April 2008;Dammann v. Switzerland, no 77551\/01, \u00a7 57, 25 April 2006;De Haes and Gijsels v. Belgium, 24 February 1997, \u00a7 37, Reports 1997-I;Dupuis and Others v. France, no 1914\/02, 7 June 2007;Ernst and Others v. Belgium, no 33400\/96, \u00a7 98, 15 July 2003;Fressoz and Roire v. France [GC], no 29183\/95, \u00a7 45, ECHR 1999 I;Hachette Filipacchi Associ\u00e9s (ICI PARIS) v. France, no 12268\/03, \u00a7 40, 23 July 2009;Handyside v. the United Kingdom, 7 December 1976, \u00a7 49 in fine, Series A no 24;Jersild v. Denmark, 23 September 1994, Series A no 298;Lindon, Otchakovsky-Laurens and July v. France [GC], nos. 21279\/02 and 36448\/02, \u00a7 59, ECHR 2007 IV;Lingens v. Austria, 8 July 1986, \u00a7 44, Series A no 103;Lopes Gomes da Silva v. Portugal, no 37698\/97, \u00a7 36, ECHR 2000 X;Monnat v. Switzerland, no 73604\/01, \u00a7 70, ECHR 2006 X;Mouvement ra\u00eblien suisse v. Switzerland [GC], no 16354\/06, \u00a7 48, ECHR 2012 (extracts);Ormanni v. Italy, no 30278\/04, \u00a7 59, 17 July 2007;Perna v. Italy [GC], no 48898\/99, \u00a7 39, ECHR 2003 V;Pinto Coelho v. Portugal, no 28439\/08, \u00a7 33, 28 June 2011;Prager and Oberschlick v. Austria, 26 April 1995, \u00a7 38, Series A no 313;Steel and Morris v. the United Kingdom, no 68416\/01, \u00a7 87, ECHR 2005 II;Stoll v. Switzerland [GC], no 69698\/01, ECHR 2007 V;S\u00fcrek v. Turkey (no 1) [GC], no 26682\/95, ECHR 1999-IV;Thoma v. Luxembourg, no 38432\/97, \u00a7\u00a7 43 45, ECHR 2001 III;Tourancheau and July v. France, no 53886\/00, 24 November 2005;Wingrove v. the United Kingdom, 25 November 1996, \u00a7 58, Reports 1996 V;Worm v. Austria, 29 August 1997, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-V", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression -{General} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Andr\u00e1s Saj\u00f3;Guido Raimondi;Helen Keller;Neboj\u0161a Vu\u010dini\u0107;Paul Lemmens;Robert Spano", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0701JUD005692508" }, "295": { "webcast_id": "4045407_15042015", "hearing_date": "2015-04-15 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Couderc and Hachette Filipacchi Associ\u00e9s v. France (no. 40454\/07)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "40454\/07", "case_id": "001-158861", "case_name": "CASE OF COUDERC AND HACHETTE FILIPACCHI ASSOCI\u00c9S v. FRANCE", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-158861", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2015-11-10 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Articles 9 and 1382 of the Civil Code", "represented_by": "DE PERCIN M.-Ch.", "respondent": "FRA", "articles": "8;8-1;10;10-1;10-2;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Alkaya v. Turkey, no 42811\/06, \u00a7 35, 9 October 2012;Axel Springer AG v. Germany [GC], no 39954\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 90-95, 7 February 2012;Barthold v. Germany, 25 March 1985, \u00a7 58, Series A no 90;Bj\u00f6rk Ei\u00f0sd\u00f3ttir v. Iceland, no 46443\/09, \u00a7 67, 10 July 2012;Bladet Troms\u00f8 and Stensaas v. Norway [GC], no 21980\/93, \u00a7\u00a7 59 and 62, ECHR 1999 III;Campmany and Lopez Galiacho Perona v. Spain (dec.), no 54224\/00, ECHR 2000-XII;\u00c9ditions Plon v. France, no 58148\/00, ECHR 2004 IV;Elsholz v. Germany [GC], no 25735\/94, \u00a7 73, ECHR 2000 VIII;Erla Hlynsd\u03ccttir v. Iceland, no 43380\/10, \u00a7 64, 10 July 2012;Fressoz and Roire v. France [GC], no 29183\/95, \u00a7 54, ECHR 1999 I;Gurgenidze v. Georgia, no 71678\/01, \u00a7\u00a7 55 60, 17 October 2006;Hachette Filipacchi Associ\u00e9s (ICI PARIS) v. France, no 12268\/03, \u00a7 40, 23 July 2009;Hachette Filipacchi Associ\u00e9s v. France, no 71111\/01, \u00a7 48, 14 June 2007;Haldimann and Others v. Switzerland, no 21830\/09, \u00a7 57, ECHR 2015;Handyside v. the United Kingdom, 7 December 1976, \u00a7 49, Series A no 24;Jersild v. Denmark, 23 September 1994, Series A no 298;Karhuvaara and Iltalehti v. Finland, no 53678\/00, \u00a7 45, ECHR 2004 X;Lillo-Stenberg and S\u00e6ther v. Norway, no 13258\/09, \u00a7 37, 16 January 2014;Lindon, Otchakovsky-Laurens and July v. France [GC], nos. 21279\/02 and 36448\/02, \u00a7 45, ECHR 2007 IV;Lingens v. Austria, 8 July 1986, \u00a7 42, Series A no 103;Mater v. Turkey, no 54997\/08, \u00a7 55, 16 July 2013;MGN Limited v. the United Kingdom, no 39401\/04, 18 January 2011;Minelli v. Switzerland (dec.), no 14991\/02, 14 June 2005;Mosley v. the United Kingdom, no 48009\/08, 10 May 2011;News Verlags GmbH & Co.KG v. Austria, no 31457\/96, \u00a7 54, ECHR 2000 I;Ojala and Etukeno Oy v. Finland, no 69939\/10, \u00a7\u00a7 54-55, 14 January 2014;Pedersen and Baadsgaard v. Denmark [GC], no 49017\/99, \u00a7 71, ECHR 2004 XI;Pinto Coelho v. Portugal, no 28439\/08, \u00a7 38, 28 June 2011;Polanco Torres and Movilla Polanco v. Spain, no 34147\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 47-48, 21 September 2010;Reklos and Davourlis v. Greece, no 1234\/05, \u00a7 42, 15 January 2009;Roseiro Bento v. Portugal, no 29288\/02, \u00a7 45, 18 April 2006;Ruusunen v. Finland, no. 73579\/10, \u00a7\u00a7 49-51, 14 January 2014;Smirnova v. Russia, nos. 46133\/99 and 48183\/99, \u00a7 95, ECHR 2003 IX (extracts);Soci\u00e9t\u00e9 Prisma Presse v. France (dec.), nos. 66910\/01 and 71612\/01, 1 July 2003;Standard Verlags GmbH v. Austria (no 2), no 21277\/05 \u00a7 52, 4 June 2009;Standard Verlags GmbH and Krawagna-Pfeifer v. Austria, no 19710\/02, \u00a7 47, 2 November 2006;Stoll v. Switzerland [GC], no 69698\/01, ECHR 2007 V;Sunday Times v. the United Kingdom (no 1), 26 April 1979, \u00a7 62, Series A no 30;T\u0103n\u0103soaica v. Romania, no 3490\/03, \u00a7 41, 19 June 2012;T\u00f8nsbergs Blad A.S. and Haukom v. Norway, no 510\/04, \u00a7 87, 1 March 2007;Verlagsgruppe News GmbH v. Austria (no 2), no 10520\/02, \u00a7 36, 14 December 2006;Von Hannover v. Germany (no 2) [GC], nos. 40660\/08 and 60641\/08, ECHR 2012;Von Hannover v. Germany (no 3), no 8772\/10, 19 September 2013;Wingrove v. the United Kingdom, 25 November 1996, \u00a7 58, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 V", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression -{General} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression;Freedom to impart information);Damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "FALSE", "judges": "Ale\u0161 Pejchal;Andr\u00e9 Potocki;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Ann Power-Forde;Branko Lubarda;Dean Spielmann;Erik M\u00f8se;Helen Keller;Helena J\u00e4derblom;Johannes Silvis;Josep Casadevall;Julia Laffranque;Khanlar Hajiyev;Ledi Bianku;Mark Villiger;Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska;P\u00e4ivi Hirvel\u00e4;Paul Lemmens;Paulo Pinto De Albuquerque;Robert Spano", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1110JUD004045407" }, "296": { "webcast_id": "4045407_15042015", "hearing_date": "2015-04-15 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Couderc and Hachette Filipacchi Associ\u00e9s v. France (no. 40454\/07)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "40454\/07", "case_id": "001-145084", "case_name": "CASE OF COUDERC AND HACHETTE FILIPACCHI ASSOCI\u00c9S v. FRANCE", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-145084", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2014-06-12 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 3, "court": "23", "issue": "", "represented_by": "DE PERCIN M.-C.", "respondent": "FRA", "articles": "8;8-1;10;10-1;10-2", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Armonien\u0117 v. Lithuania, no 36919\/02, \u00a7 36, 25 November 2008;Artun and G\u00fcvener v. Turkey, no 75510\/01, 26 June 2007;Axel Springer AG v. Germany [GC], no 39954\/08, 7 February 2012;Bladet Troms\u00f8 and Stensaas v. Norway [GC], no 21980\/93, \u00a7\u00a7 59 and 62, ECHR 1999 III;Chauvy and Others v. France, no 64915\/01, \u00a7 70, ECHR 2004 VI;Colombani and Others v. France, no 51279\/99, \u00a7 68, ECHR 2002-V;Eon v. France, no 26118\/10, \u00a7 59, 14 March 2013;Flinkkil\u00e4 and Others v. Finland, no 25576\/04, 6 April 2010;Gurgenidze v. Georgia, no 71678\/01, \u00a7 55, 17 October 2006;Hachette Filipacchi Associ\u00e9s (\u00ab Ici Paris \u00bb) v. France, no 12268\/03, 23 July 2009;Hachette Filipacchi Associ\u00e9s v. France, no 71111\/01, \u00a7 43, 14 June 2007;Karhuvaara and Iltalehti v. Finland, no 53678\/00, \u00a7 38, ECHR 2004 X;Lindon, Otchakovsky-Laurens and July v. France [GC], nos. 21279\/02 and 36448\/02, \u00a7 62, ECHR 2007 IV;Lopes Gomes da Silva v. Portugal, no 37698\/97, \u00a7 30, ECHR 2000-X;MGN Limited v. the United Kingdom, no 39401\/04, \u00a7 142, 18 January 2011;Minelli v. Switzerland (dec.), no 14991\/02, 14 June 2005;Mosley v. the United Kingdom, no 48009\/08, \u00a7 111, 10 May 2011;Mouvement ra\u00eblien suisse v. Switzerland [GC], no 16354\/06, \u00a7 60, ECHR 2012 (extracts);Ojala and Etukeno Oy v. Finland, no 69939\/10, 14 January 2014;Otegi Mondragon v. Spain, no 2034\/07, ECHR 2011;Pedersen and Baadsgaard v. Denmark [GC], no 49017\/99, ECHR 2004-XI;Polanco Torres and Movilla Polanco v. Spain, no 34147\/06 \u00a7 40, 21 September 2010;Reklos and Davourlis v. Greece, no 1234\/05, \u00a7 35, 15 January 2009;Ruusunen v. Finland, no 73579\/10, 14 January 2014;S. and Marper v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 30562\/04 and 30566\/04, \u00a7 66, ECHR 2008;Saaristo and Others v. Finland, no 184\/06, \u00a7 61, 12 October 2010;Sch\u00fcssel v. Austria (dec.), no 42409\/98, 21 February 2002;S\u00f6derman v. Sweden [GC], nos. 5786\/08, \u00a7 78, ECHR 2013;Standard Verlags GmbH v. Austria (no 2), no 21277\/05 4 June 2009;S\u00fcrek v. Turkey (no 1) [GC], no 26682\/95, \u00a7 64, ECHR 1999-IV;Tammer v. Estonia, no 41205\/98, \u00a7 60, ECHR 2001 I;Timciuc v. Romania (dec.), no 28999\/03, \u00a7 144, 12 October 2010;Vides Aizsardz\u012bbas Klubs v. Latvia, no 57829\/00, \u00a7 40, 27 May 2004;Von Hannover v. Germany, no. 59320\/00, \u00a7 57, ECHR 2004-VI;Von Hannover v. Germany (no 2) [GC], nos. 40660\/08 and 60641\/08, ECHR 2012;Von Hannover v. Germany (no 3), no 8772\/10, 19 September 2013;X and Y v. the Netherlands, 26 March 1985, \u00a7 23, Series A no 91", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression -{General} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression;Freedom to impart information)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Andr\u00e9 Potocki;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Ann Power-Forde;Helena J\u00e4derblom;Mark Villiger;Paul Lemmens", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0612JUD004045407" }, "297": { "webcast_id": "1750207_08042015", "hearing_date": "2015-04-08 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Avoti\u0146\u0161 v. Latvia (no. 17502\/07)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "17502\/07", "case_id": "001-163114", "case_name": "CASE OF AVOTI\u0145\u0160 v. LATVIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-163114", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2016-05-23 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Section 230(1) of the Latvian Civil Procedure Law", "represented_by": "EGL\u012aTIS J. ; LIEPA L.", "respondent": "LVA", "articles": "6;6-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Akdivar and Others v. Turkey, 16 September 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 IV;Bosphorus Hava Yollar\u0131 Turizm ve Ticaret Anonim \u015eirketi v. Ireland [GC], no. 45036\/98, ECHR 2005 VI;Centro Europa 7 S.r.l. and Di Stefano v. Italy [GC], no. 38433\/09, \u00a7 197, ECHR 2012;Dhahbi v. Italy, no. 17120\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 31-34, 8 April 2014;Drozd and Janousek v. France and Spain, 26 June 1992, \u00a7 110, Series A no. 240;Garc\u00eda Ruiz v. Spain [GC], no. 30544\/96, \u00a7 28, ECHR 1999-I;Gorraiz Lizarraga and Others v. Spain, no. 62543\/00, \u00a7 56, ECHR 2004-III;Hussin v. Belgium (dec.), no. 70807\/01, 6 May 2004;Jeunesse v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 12738\/10, \u00a7 110, 3 October 2014;M.S.S. v. Belgium and Greece [GC], no. 30696\/09, \u00a7 338, ECHR 2011;McDonald v. France (dec.), no. 18648\/04, 29 April 2008;Michaud v. France, no. 12323\/11, ECHR 2012;Miholapa v. Latvia, no. 61655\/00, \u00a7 23, 31 May 2007;Naydenov v. Bulgaria, no. 17353\/03, \u00a7 50, 26 November 2009;\u00d6v\u00fc\u015f v. Turkey, no. 42981\/04, \u00a7 47, 13 October 2009;Pellegrini v. Italy, no. 30882\/96, \u00a7\u00a7 40-41, ECHR 2001 VIII;Povse v. Austria (dec.), no. 3890\/11, 18 June 2013;Robba v. Germany, no. 20999\/92, Commission decision of 28 February 1996;S.J. v. Luxembourg, no. 34471\/04, \u00a7 52, 4 March 2008;Saccoccia v. Austria, no. 69917\/01, \u00a7\u00a7 60-62, 18 December 2008;Sargsyan v. Azerbaijan [GC], no. 40167\/06, \u00a7 115, ECHR 2015;Sholokhov v. Armenia and the Republic of Moldova, no. 40358\/05, \u00a7 66, 31 July 2012;Soci\u00e9t\u00e9 Gu\u00e9rin Automobiles v. the 15 States of the European Union (dec.), no. 51717\/99, 4 July 2000;Ullens de Schooten and Rezabek v. Belgium, nos. 3989\/07 and 38353\/07, \u00a7 62, 20 September 2011;Waite and Kennedy v. Germany [GC], no. 26083\/94, \u00a7\u00a7 63 and 72, ECHR 1999 I;X v. Latvia [GC], no. 27853\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 98 and 107, ECHR 2013", "external_sources": "Preamble, Articles 34(1) and 34(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 44\/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (Brussels I Regulation);Article 6 (amended) of the Treaty on European Union;Article 52(3) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union;Treaty of Lisbon;Dublin II Regulation;Articles 67(1), 81(1) and 82(1) of the TFEU", "conclusion": "No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Enforcement proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing;Adversarial trial;Equality of arms)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Ale\u0161 Pejchal;Andr\u00e1s Saj\u00f3;Andr\u00e9 Potocki;Dean Spielmann;Egidijus K\u016bris;Elisabeth Steiner;Ganna Yudkivska;George Nicolaou;Ineta Ziemele;J\u00e1n \u0160ikuta;Jon Fridrik Kj\u00f8lbro;Josep Casadevall;Krzysztof Wojtyczek;Ledi Bianku;Mark Villiger;Nona Tsotsoria;P\u00e4ivi Hirvel\u00e4;Paul Lemmens;Robert Spano;Vincent A. De Gaetano;Zdravka Kalaydjieva;Ksenija Turkovi\u0107", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0523JUD001750207" }, "298": { "webcast_id": "1750207_08042015", "hearing_date": "2015-04-08 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Avoti\u0146\u0161 v. Latvia (no. 17502\/07)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "17502\/07", "case_id": "001-141644", "case_name": "CASE OF AVOTI\u0145\u0160 v. LATVIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-141644", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2014-02-25 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 3, "court": "7", "issue": "Sections 637 and 644 of the Latvian Civil Procedure Law", "represented_by": "EGLITIS J.", "respondent": "LVA", "articles": "6;6-1;35;35-1;35-3-b", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Bosphorus Hava Yollar\u0131 Turizm ve Ticaret Anonim \u015eirketi v. Ireland [GC], no 45036\/98, ECHR 2005 VI;Gorraiz Lizarraga and Others v. Spain, no 62543\/00, \u00a7 56, ECHR 2004 III;Gri\u0161ankova and Gri\u0161ankovs v. Latvia (dec.), no 36117\/02, ECHR 2003 II;S.J. v. Luxembourg, no 34471\/04, \u00a7 52, 4 March 2008;Joos v. Switzerland, no 43245\/07, \u00a7 19, 15 November 2012;Liep\u0101jnieks v. Latvia (dec.), no 37586\/06, \u00a7 73, 2 November 2010;McDonald v. France (dec.), no 18648\/04, 29 April 2008;Michaud v. France, no 12323\/11, \u00a7 100, ECHR 2012;Miholapa v. Latvia, no 61655\/00, \u00a7 23, 31 May 2007;Orams v. Cyprus (dec.), no 27841\/07, 10 June 2010;\u00d6v\u00fc\u015f v. Turkey, no 42981\/04, \u00a7 47, 13 October 2009;Pellegrini v. Italy, no 30882\/96, \u00a7\u00a7 40-41, 2001 VIII;Sancho Cruz and 14 other \u00ab Agrarian Reform \u00bb cases v. Portugal, nos. 8851\/07, 8854\/07, 8856\/07, 8865\/07, 10142\/07, 10144\/07, 24622\/07, 32733\/07, 32744\/07, 41645\/07, 19150\/08, 22885\/08, 22887\/08, 26612\/08 and 202\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 33-35, 18 January 2011;Savi\u010ds v. Latvia, no 17892\/03, \u00a7\u00a7 113-114, 27 November 2012;Shefer v. Russia (dec.), no 45175\/04, \u00a7\u00a7 24-25, 13 March 2012;Sholokhov v. Armenia and Moldova, no 40358\/05, \u00a7 66, 31 July 2012", "external_sources": "Articles 33-36, 38 et 54 of the Council Regulation (EC) No 44\/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and and commercial matters (\u201cBrussels I Regulation\u201d)", "conclusion": "Preliminary objection dismissed (Article 35-3-b - No significant disadvantage);Preliminary objection dismissed (Article 35-1 - Exhaustion of domestic remedies);No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing;Equality of arms)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "George Nicolaou;Ineta Ziemele;Krzysztof Wojtyczek;Ledi Bianku;P\u00e4ivi Hirvel\u00e4;Vincent A. De Gaetano;Zdravka Kalaydjieva", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0225JUD001750207" }, "299": { "webcast_id": "3859010_01042015", "hearing_date": "2015-04-01 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Biao v. Denmark (no. 38590\/10)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "38590\/10", "case_id": "001-163115", "case_name": "CASE OF BIAO v. DENMARK", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-163115", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2016-05-24 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Act no. 1204 of 27 December 2003 ; Section 9, subsection 7 of the Aliens Act", "represented_by": "PETERSEN S.", "respondent": "DNK", "articles": "8;8-1;14;14+8;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Abdulaziz, Cabales and Balkandali v. the United Kingdom, 28 May 1985, Series A no. 94;Andrejeva v. Latvia [GC], no. 55707\/00, \u00a7 87, ECHR 2009;Burden v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 13378\/05, \u00a7 60, ECHR 2008;C. v. Belgium, 7 August 1996, \u00a7 38, Reports 1996 III;Carson and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 42184\/05, ECHR 2010;Clift v. the United Kingdom, no. 7205\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 56-58, 13 July 2010;D.H. and Others v. the Czech Republic [GC], no. 57325\/00, ECHR 2007-IV;Dhahbi v. Italy, no. 17120\/09, \u00a7 47, 8 April 2014;E.B. v. France [GC], no. 43546\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 47-48, 22 January 2008;Engel and Others v. the Netherlands, 8 June 1976, \u00a7 72, Series A no. 22;F.N. v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 3202\/09, \u00a7 37, 17 September 2013;Fabris v. France [GC], no. 16574\/08, \u00a7 56, ECHR 2013 (extracts);Gaygusuz v. Austria, 16 September 1996, \u00a7 42, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 IV;H\u00e4m\u00e4l\u00e4inen v. Finland [GC], no. 37359\/09, \u00a7 108, ECHR 2014;Hode and Abdi v. the United Kingdom, no. 22341\/09, 6 November 2012;Hugh Jordan v. the United Kingdom, no. 24746\/94, \u00a7 154, 4 May 2001;J.M. v. Sweden (dec.), no. 47509\/13, \u00a7 40, 8 April 2014;Jeunesse v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 12738\/10, \u00a7 107, 3 October 2014;Kjeldsen, Busk Madsen and Pedersen v. Denmark, 7 December 1976, \u00a7 56, Series A no. 23;Konstantin Markin v. Russia [GC] (no. 30078\/06, ECHR 2012 (extracts);Koua Poirrez v. France, no. 40892\/98, \u00a7 46, ECHR 2003-X;Kuri\u0107 and Others v. Slovenia [GC], no. 26828\/06, \u00a7 427, ECHR 2012 (extracts);Nachova and Others v. Bulgaria [GC], nos. 43577\/98 and 43579\/98, \u00a7145, ECHR 2005 VII;Osman v. Denmark, 38058\/09, \u00a7 58, 14 June 2011;Ponomaryovi v. Bulgaria, no. 5335\/05, ECHR 2011;Ramsahai and Others v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 52391\/99, \u00a7 376, ECHR 2007 II;S.A.S. v. France [GC], no. 43835\/11, \u00a7 161, ECHR 2014 (extracts);\u015eerife Yi\u011fit v. Turkey [GC], no. 3976\/05, \u00a7 70, 2 November 2010;S\u00f6derman v. Sweden [GC], no. 5786\/08, \u00a7 125, ECHR 2013;Stec and Others v. the United Kingdom (dec.) [GC], nos. 65731\/01 and 65900\/01, \u00a7\u00a7 39-40, ECHR 2005 X;Stummer v. Austria [GC], no. 37452\/02, \u00a7 89, ECHR 2011;Timishev v. Russia, nos. 55762\/00 and 55974\/00, \u00a7 56, ECHR 2005 XII;Valentin v. Denmark, no. 26461\/06, \u00a7 82, 26 March 2009;Vallianatos and Others v. Greece [GC], nos. 29381\/09 and 32684\/09, ECHR 201;Vasileva v. Denmark, no. 52792\/99, \u00a7 50, 25 September 2003;X and Others v. Austria [GC], no. 19010\/07, ECHR 2013;Zakayev and Safanova v. Russia, no. 11870\/03, \u00a7 40, 11 February 2010", "external_sources": "Article 5 \u00a7 2 of the European Convention on Nationality and its Explanatory Report;Directive 2004\/38\/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the member States;European Commission against Racism and Intolerance (ECRI)\u2019s reports on Denmark CRI (2001) 4, CRI (2006) 18 and CRI (2012) 25;Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights\u2019s recommendations to Denmark in respect of the Aliens Act", "conclusion": "Violation of Article 14+8 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life;Article 8-1 - Respect for family life);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Andr\u00e1s Saj\u00f3;Andr\u00e9 Potocki;Dean Spielmann;Egidijus K\u016bris;Elisabeth Steiner;Ganna Yudkivska;George Nicolaou;Guido Raimondi;Helena J\u00e4derblom;J\u00e1n \u0160ikuta;Jon Fridrik Kj\u00f8lbro;Josep Casadevall;Ledi Bianku;Mark Villiger;Neboj\u0161a Vu\u010dini\u0107;P\u00e4ivi Hirvel\u00e4;Paul Lemmens;Paul Mahoney;Paulo Pinto De Albuquerque;Peer Lorenzen;Robert Spano;Vincent A. De Gaetano;Ksenija Turkovi\u0107", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0524JUD003859010" }, "300": { "webcast_id": "3859010_01042015", "hearing_date": "2015-04-01 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Biao v. Denmark (no. 38590\/10)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "38590\/10", "case_id": "001-141941", "case_name": "CASE OF BIAO v. DENMARK", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-141941", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2014-03-25 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 3, "court": "5", "issue": "Section 9, Subsection 7, Aliens Act, 1 January 2004 ; Act No. 1204, 27 December 2003 ; Preparatory works to Act No. 1204, 27 December 2003 ; Act No. 365, 6 June 2002 ; Preparatory works to Act No. 365, 6 June 2002", "represented_by": "PETERSEN S.", "respondent": "DNK", "articles": "8;8-1;14;14+8", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Abdulaziz, Cabales and Balkandali v. the United Kingdom, 28 May 1985, Series A no. 94;Ajayi and Others v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 27663\/95, 22 June 1999;Andrey Sheabashov v. Latvia (dec.), no. 50065\/99, 22 May 1999;Antwi and Others v. Norway, no. 26940\/10, \u00a7\u00a7 88 89, 14 February 2012;Bah v. the United Kingdom, no. 56328\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 43-46, ECHR 2011;Boujlifa v. France, judgment of 21 October 1997, \u00a7 42, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997 VI;Burden v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 13378\/05, \u00a7 60, ECHR 2008;Butt v. Norway, no. 47017\/09, \u00a7 70, 4 December 2012;Carson and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 42184\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 61 and 70, ECHR 2010;Clift v. the United Kingdom, no.7205\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 56-58, 13 July 2010;D.H. and Others v. the Czech Republic [GC], no. 57325\/00, ECHR 2007;Darren Omoregie and Others v. Norway, no. 265\/07, \u00a7 64, 31 July 2008;Donohoe v. Ireland, no. 19165\/08, \u00a7 73, 12 December 2013;Engel and Others v. the Netherlands, 8 June 1976, \u00a7 72, Series A no. 22;G\u00fcl v. Switzerland, judgment of 19 February 1996, Reports 1996-I;Hode and Abdi v. the United Kingdom, no. 22341\/09, 6 November 2012;Jerry Olajide Sarumi v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 43279\/98, 26 January 1999;Kiyutin v. Russia, no. 2700\/10, \u00a7 57, ECHR 2011;Kjeldsen, Busk Madsen and Pedersen v. Denmark, 7 December 1976, \u00a7 56, Series A no. 23;Kuri\u0107 and Others v. Slovenia [GC], no. 26828\/06, ECHR 2012 (extracts);Mitchell v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 40447\/98, 24 November 1998;Nunez v. Norway, no. 55597\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 66-70, 28 June 2011;Osman v. Denmark, no. 38058\/09, \u00a7 53, 14 June 2011;Ponomaryovi v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 5335\/05, 18 September 2007;Priya v. Denmark (dec.), no. 13549\/03, 6 July 2006;Rodrigues da Silva and Hoogkamer v. the Netherlands, no. 50435\/99, ECHR 2006 I;S\u00f6derman v. Sweden [GC], no. 5786\/08, \u00a7 78, 12 November 2013;Solomon v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 44328\/98, 5 September 2000;Stec and Others v. the United Kingdom (dec.) [GC], nos. 65731\/01 and 65900\/01, \u00a7 39, ECHR 2005 X;Taxquet v. Belgium [GC], no. 926\/05, \u00a7 83 in fine, ECHR 2010", "external_sources": "Article 5 \u00a7 2, Council of Europe, European Convention on Nationality, 6 November 1997, ETS No. 166;Letter of 15 October 2004 Mr Alvaro Gil-Robles, Commissioner for Human Rights to the Danish Government\n", "conclusion": "No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Positive obligations;Article 8-1 - Respect for family life);No violation of Article 14+8 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life;Article 8-1 - Respect for family life)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Andr\u00e1s Saj\u00f3;Egidijus K\u016bris;Guido Raimondi;Neboj\u0161a Vu\u010dini\u0107;Paul Lemmens;Peer Lorenzen;Robert Spano", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0325JUD003859010" }, "301": { "webcast_id": "3859010_01042015", "hearing_date": "2015-04-01 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Biao v. Denmark (no. 38590\/10)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "38590\/10", "case_id": "001-111156", "case_name": "BIAO v. DENMARK", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-111156", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "2012-05-11 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "PETERSEN S.", "respondent": "DNK", "articles": "8;8-1;14", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "", "separate_opinion": "FALSE", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "302": { "webcast_id": "915410_04032015", "hearing_date": "2015-03-04 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Schatschaschwili v. Germany (no. 9154\/10)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "9154\/10", "case_id": "001-159566", "case_name": "CASE OF SCHATSCHASCHWILI v. GERMANY", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-159566", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2015-12-15 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Articles 140 \u00a7 1, 141 \u00a7 3, 168c \u00a7\u00a7 2 and 5, 251 \u00a7\u00a7 1 (2) and 2 (1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure", "represented_by": "MEYER-MEWS H.", "respondent": "DEU", "articles": "6;6+6-3-d;6-1;6-3-d;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "A.G. v. Sweden (dec.), no. 315\/09, 10 January 2012;Aigner v. Austria, no. 28328\/03, \u00a7\u00a7 41-43, 10 May 2012;Al-Khawaja and Tahery v. the United Kingdom ([GC], nos. 26766\/05 and 22228\/06, ECHR 2011;Asadbeyli and Others v. Azerbaijan, nos. 3653\/05, 14729\/05, 20908\/05, 26242\/05, 36083\/05 and 16519\/06, \u00a7 134, 11 December 2012;Beggs v. the United Kingdom, no. 25133\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 156-159, 6 November 2012;Bobe\u015f v. Romania, no. 29752\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 39-40, 9 July 2013;Brzuszczy\u0144ski v. Poland, no. 23789\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 85 88, 17 September 2013;Cevat Soysal v. Turkey, no. 17362\/03, \u00a7\u00a7 76-79, 23 September 2014;Chmura v. Poland, no. 18475\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 50-51, 3 April 2012;D.T. v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 25307\/10, \u00a7 50, 2 April 2013;Damir Sibgatullin v. Russia, no. 1413\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 54-56, 24 April 2012;F\u0105frowicz v. Poland, no. 43609\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 56 63, 17 April 2012;Gabrielyan v. Armenia, no. 8088\/05, 10 April 2012;G\u00e4fgen v. Germany [GC], no. 22978\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 163 and 175, ECHR 2010;Gani v. Spain, no. 61800\/08, 19 February 2013;Garofolo v. Switzerland (dec.), no. 4380\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 52-53 and 56-57, 2 April 2013;Gonz\u00e1les N\u00e1jera v. Spain (dec.), no. 61047\/13, \u00a7\u00a7 54-56, 11 February 2014;Heglas v. the Czech Republic, no. 5935\/02, \u00a7 84, 1 March 2007;Horncastle and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 4184\/10, \u00a7\u00a7 150-151, 16 December 2014;H\u00fcmmer v. Germany, no. 26171\/07, 19 July 2012;Imbrioscia v. Switzerland, 24 November 1993, \u00a7 36, Series A no. 275;Jalloh v. Germany [GC], no. 54810\/00, \u00a7 94, ECHR 2006 IX;Khodorkovskiy and Lebedev v. Russia, nos. 11082\/06 and 13772\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 709-16, 25 July 2013;Kostecki v. Poland, no. 14932\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 65-67, 4 June 2013;Lu\u010di\u0107 v. Croatia, no. 5699\/11, \u00a7\u00a7 79-80, 27 February 2014;L\u00fcdi v. Switzerland, 15 June 1992, \u00a7 43, Series A no. 238;Matytsina v. Russia, no. 58428\/10, \u00a7\u00a7 163-65, 27 March 2014;McGlynn v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 40612\/11, \u00a7\u00a7 23-24, 16 October 2012;Mitkus v. Latvia, no. 7259\/03, \u00a7\u00a7 101-102 and 106, 2 October 2012;N.C. v. Italy [GC], no. 24952\/94, \u00a7 56, ECHR 2002 X;Nechto v. Russia, no. 24893\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 119-127, 24 January 2012;Nikolitsas v. Greece, no. 63117\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 35-37, 3 July 2014;Pichugin v. Russia, no. 38623\/03, \u00a7\u00a7 196-200, 23 October 2012;Pr\u0103jin\u0103 v. Romania, no. 5592\/05, 7 January 2014;Rosin v. Estonia, no. 26540\/08, 19 December 2013;Rudnichenko v. Ukraine, no. 2775\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 105-110, 11 July 2013;Salduz v. Turkey [GC], no. 36391\/02, ECHR 2008;Salikhov v. Russia, no. 23880\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 1165-118 et seq., 3 May 2012;\u015eandru v. Romania, no. 33882\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 62-70, 15 October 2013;Sarkizov and Others v. Bulgaria, nos. 37981\/06, 38022\/06, 39122\/06 and 44278\/06, \u00a7 58, 17 April 2012;Schenk v. Switzerland, 12 July 1988, \u00a7 45, Series A no. 140;Scholer v. Germany, no. 14212\/10, \u00a7 60, 18 December 2014;Sellick and Sellick v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 18743\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 54-55, 16 October 2012;Sic\u0103 v. Romania, no. 12036\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 73-77, 9 July 2013;\u0160tefan\u010di\u010d v. Slovenia, no. 18027\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 42-47, 25 October 2012;Suldin v. Russia, no. 20077\/04, \u00a7\u00a7 56-59, 16 October 2014;Taxquet v. Belgium [GC], no. 926\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 83-84, ECHR 2010;Trampevski v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, no. 4570\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 44-45, 10 July 2012;Tseber v. the Czech Republic, no. 46203\/08, 22 November 2012;Vronchenko v. Estonia, no. 59632\/09, \u00a7 58, 18 July 2013;Windisch v. Austria, 27 September 1990, \u00a7 23, Series A no. 186;Yevgeniy Ivanov v. Russia, no. 27100\/03, \u00a7\u00a7 45-50, 25 April 2013", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Violation of Article 6+6-3-d - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing) (Article 6-3-d - Examination of witnesses;Article 6 - Right to a fair trial);Just satisfaction dismissed (out of time) (Article 41 - Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Ale\u0161 Pejchal;Andr\u00e1s Saj\u00f3;Andr\u00e9 Potocki;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Ann Power-Forde;Dean Spielmann;Egidijus K\u016bris;Ganna Yudkivska;Helen Keller;Helena J\u00e4derblom;Jon Fridrik Kj\u00f8lbro;Josep Casadevall;Julia Laffranque;Khanlar Hajiyev;Kristina Pardalos;Luis L\u00f3pez Guerra;Mark Villiger;Nona Tsotsoria;P\u00e4ivi Hirvel\u00e4;Paul Mahoney", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1215JUD000915410" }, "303": { "webcast_id": "915410_04032015", "hearing_date": "2015-03-04 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Schatschaschwili v. Germany (no. 9154\/10)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "9154\/10", "case_id": "001-142423", "case_name": "CASE OF SCHATSCHASCHWILI v. GERMANY", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-142423", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2014-04-17 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 3, "court": "23", "issue": "Article 168 (c) of the Code of Criminal Procedure", "represented_by": "MEYER-MEWS H.", "respondent": "DEU", "articles": "6;6+6-3-d;6-1;6-3;6-3-d;35", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Al-Khawaja and Tahery v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 26766\/05 and 22228\/06, \u00a7 118, ECHR 2011;Artner v. Austria, 28 August 1992, \u00a7\u00a7 21-22, Series A no. 242 A;Asch v. Austria, 26 April 1991, \u00a7 28, Series A no. 203;D. v. Finland, no. 30542\/04, \u00a7 41, 7 July 2009;De Lorenzo v. Italy (dec.), no. 69264\/01, 12 February 2004;Doorson v. the Netherlands, 26 March 1996, \u00a7 70, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 II;Ellis and Simms v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 46099\/06, \u00a7 81, 10 April 2012;G\u00e4fgen v. Germany [GC], no. 22978\/05, \u00a7 175, ECHR 2010;Gossa v. Poland, no. 47986\/99, 9 January 2007;Haas v. Germany (dec.), no. 73047\/01, 17 November 2005;H\u00fcmmer v. Germany, no. 26171\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 41 and 43, 19 July 2012;Luc\u00e0 v. Italy, no. 33354\/96, \u00a7 39, ECHR 2001 II;Mayali v. France, no. 69116\/01, \u00a7 32, 14 June 2005;Pesukic v. Switzerland, no. 25088\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 49-50, 6 December 2012;Sadak and Others v. Turkey, nos. 29900\/96, 29901\/96, 29902\/96 and 29903\/96, \u00a7 67, ECHR 2001 VIII;Scheper v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 39209\/02, 5 April 2005;Solakov v. \u201cthe former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia\u201d, no. 47023\/99, \u00a7 57, ECHR 2001 X;\u0160tefan\u010di\u010d v. Slovenia, no. 18027\/05, \u00a7 42, 25 October 2012;Taxquet v. Belgium [GC], no. 926\/05, \u00a7 84, ECHR 2010", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Remainder inadmissible;No violation of Article 6+6-3-d - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing;Equality of arms) (Article 6 - Right to a fair trial;Article 6-3 - Rights of defence;Article 6-3-d - Examination of witnesses)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Ale\u0161 Pejchal;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Ann Power-Forde;Ganna Yudkivska;Helena J\u00e4derblom;Mark Villiger", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0417JUD000915410" }, "304": { "webcast_id": "915410_04032015", "hearing_date": "2015-03-04 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Schatschaschwili v. Germany (no. 9154\/10)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "9154\/10", "case_id": "001-116644", "case_name": "SCHATSCHASCHWILI v. GERMANY", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-116644", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "2013-01-15 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "MEYER-MEWS H.", "respondent": "DEU", "articles": "6;6-1;6-3-c;6-3-d", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "", "separate_opinion": "FALSE", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "305": { "webcast_id": "1113810_04022015", "hearing_date": "2015-02-04 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Mozer v. the Republic of Moldova and Russia (no. 11138\/10) ", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "11138\/10", "case_id": "001-161055", "case_name": "CASE OF MOZER v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-161055", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2016-02-23 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Law of the Republic of Moldova no. 1545 (1998) on compensation for damage caused by illegal acts of the criminal investigation bodies\n\n", "represented_by": "POSTICA A. ; STRAISTEANU D. ; POSTICA P.", "respondent": "MDA;RUS", "articles": "1;3;5;5-1;8;8-1;8-2;9;9-1;9-2;13;13+3;13+8-1;13+9-1;35;35-1;35-3;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Airey v. Ireland, 9 October 1979, \u00a7 24, Series A no. 32;Akdivar and Others v. Turkey, 16 September 1996, \u00a7\u00a7 65-66, Reports 1996 IV;Al-Skeini and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 55721\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 136 and 149, ECHR 2011;Asproftas v. Turkey, no. 16079\/90, \u00a7 72, 27 May 2010;Bankovi\u0107 and Others v. Belgium and Others (dec.) [GC], no. 52207\/99, \u00a7 70, ECHR 2001 XII;Bouyid v. Belgium [GC], no. 23380\/09, \u00a7 86, ECHR 2015;Catan and Others v. the Republic of Moldova and Russia [GC], nos. 43370\/04, 8252\/05 and 18454\/06, \u00a7 114, ECHR 2012 (extracts);Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin C\u00e2mpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848\/08, \u00a7 148, ECHR 2014;Chahal v. the United Kingdom, 15 November 1996, \u00a7 145, Reports 1996 V;Chiragov and Others v. Armenia [GC], no. 13216\/05, \u00a7 168, ECHR 2015;Cyprus v. Turkey [GC], no. 25781\/94, ECHR 2001 IV;De Souza Ribeiro v. France [GC], no. 22689\/07, \u00a7 78, ECHR 2012;Del R\u00edo Prada v. Spain [GC], no. 42750\/09, \u00a7 125, ECHR 2013;Demopoulos and Others v. Turkey (dec.) [GC], nos. 46113\/99, 3843\/02, 13751\/02, 13466\/03, 10200\/04, 14163\/04, 19993\/04 and 21819\/04, \u00a7 95, ECHR 2010-I;Enea v. Italy [GC], no. 74912\/01, \u00a7 55, ECHR 2009;Engel and Others v. the Netherlands, 8 June 1976, \u00a7 104, Series A no. 22;Foka v. Turkey, no. 28940\/95, 24 June 2008;Gherghina v. Romania [GC] (dec.), no. 42219\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 84-85, 9 July 2015;Gladkiy v. Russia, no. 3242\/03, \u00a7 83, 21 December 2010;Idalov v. Russia [GC], no. 5826\/03, \u00a7 93, 22 May 2012;Ila\u015fcu and Others v. Moldova and Russia [GC], no. 48787\/99, ECHR 2004 VII;Ivan\u0163oc and Others v. Moldova and Russia, no. 23687\/05, 15 November 2011;Khoroshenko v. Russia [GC], no. 41418\/04, \u00a7 106, ECHR 2015;Kud\u0142a v. Poland [GC], no. 30210\/96, ECHR 2000 XI;L.C.B. v. the United Kingdom, 9 June 1998, \u00a7\u00a7 36-41, Reports 1998 III;Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772\/95, \u00a7 119, ECHR 2000-IV;Lavents v. Latvia, no. 58442\/00, \u00a7 139, 28 November 2002;Lawless v. Ireland (merits), 1 July 1961, \u00a7 7, Series A no. 3;Loizidou v. Turkey (preliminary objections), 23 March 1995, \u00a7 62, Series A no. 310;Loizidou v. Turkey (merits), 18 December 1996, \u00a7 52, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 VI;Makaratzis v. Greece [GC], no. 50385\/99, \u00a7 51, ECHR 2004 XI;Messina v. Italy (no. 2), no. 25498\/94, \u00a7\u00a7 61-62, ECHR 2000 X;Orban and Others v. France, no. 20985\/05, \u00a7 33, 15 January 2009;Osman v. the United Kingdom, 28 October 1998, \u00a7\u00a7 115-122, Reports 1998 VIII;Pakhomov v. Russia, no. 44917\/08, \u00a7 61, 30 September 2010;Peers v. Greece, no. 28524\/95, \u00a7 67, ECHR 2001-III;Petrakidou v. Turkey, no. 16081\/90, \u00a7 71, 27 May 2010;Poltoratskiy v. Ukraine, no. 38812\/97, \u00a7 167, ECHR 2003 V;Protopapa v. Turkey, no. 16084\/90, 24 February 2009;Sargsyan v. Azerbaijan [GC], no. 40167\/06, \u00a7 128, ECHR 2015;Sejdovic v. Italy [GC], no. 56581\/00, \u00a7 46, ECHR 2006 II;Svinarenko and Slyadnev v. Russia [GC], nos. 32541\/08 and 43441\/08, \u00a7 116, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Union europ\u00e9enne des droits de l\u2019homme and Josephides v. Turkey (dec.), no. 7116\/10, \u00a7 9, 2 April 2013;Vu\u010dkovi\u0107 and Others v. Serbia (preliminary objection) [GC], nos. 17153\/11 and 29 others, \u00a7 70, 25 March 2014;Vu\u010dkovi\u0107 and Others v. Serbia, nos. 17153\/11 and 29 others, 28 August 2012;Ya\u015fa v. Turkey, 2 September 1998, \u00a7\u00a7 92-108, Reports 1998 VI \n", "external_sources": "Opinion No. 188 (1995) of the Council of Europe Parliamentary Assembly on the application by Moldova for membership of the Council of Europe\n\n", "conclusion": "Preliminary objections dismissed (Article 35-3 - Ratione loci;Ratione personae) (Russia);Preliminary objection dismissed (Article 35-1 - Exhaustion of domestic remedies) (the Republic of Moldova);Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect) (Russia);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention) (Russia);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for family life) (Russia);Violation of Article 9 - Freedom of thought conscience and religion (Article 9-1 - Freedom of religion) (Russia);Violation of Article 13+3 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 3 - Prohibition of torture;Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Russia);Violation of Article 13+8-1 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life;Article 8-1 - Respect for family life) (Russia);Violation of Article 13+9-1 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 9 - Freedom of thought conscience and religion;Article 9-1 - Freedom of religion) (Russia);No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect) (the Republic of Moldova);No violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention) (the Republic of Moldova);No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for family life) (the Republic of Moldova);No violation of Article 9 - Freedom of thought conscience and religion (Article 9-1 - Freedom of religion) (the Republic of Moldova);No violation of Article 13+3 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 3 - Prohibition of torture;Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (the Republic of Moldova);No violation of Article 13+8-1 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life;Article 8-1 - Respect for family life) (the Republic of Moldova);No violation of Article 13+9-1 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 9 - Freedom of thought conscience and religion;Article 9-1 - Freedom of religion) (the Republic of Moldova);Pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction) (Russia);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction) (Russia)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Dean Spielmann;Dmitry Dedov;Erik M\u00f8se;George Nicolaou;Guido Raimondi;J\u00e1n \u0160ikuta;Johannes Silvis;Josep Casadevall;Kristina Pardalos;Luis L\u00f3pez Guerra;Mark Villiger;Mihai Poalelungi;Neboj\u0161a Vu\u010dini\u0107;Paul Lemmens;Paul Mahoney;Ksenija Turkovi\u0107", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0223JUD001113810" }, "306": { "webcast_id": "1113810_04022015", "hearing_date": "2015-02-04 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Mozer v. the Republic of Moldova and Russia (no. 11138\/10) ", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "11138\/10", "case_id": "001-145069", "case_name": "MOZER v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-145069", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "POSTICA A. ; POSTICA V. ; STRAISTEANU D.", "respondent": "MDA;RUS", "articles": "2;2-1;3;5;5-1;5-1-a;5-1-b;8;8-1;9;9-1;13;17", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "", "separate_opinion": "", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "307": { "webcast_id": "2751008_28012015", "hearing_date": "2015-01-28 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Perin\u00e7ek v. Switzerland (no. 27510\/08)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "27510\/08", "case_id": "001-158235", "case_name": "CASE OF PER\u0130N\u00c7EK v. SWITZERLAND", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-158235", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2015-10-15 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Article 261 bis \u00a7 4 of the Criminal Code ; Article 264 of the Criminal Code ; Swiss Constitution of 1874 ; Articles 16 and 36 of the 1999 Constitution of the Swiss Confederation ; Section 106(2) of the Federal Court Act 2005 ", "represented_by": "CENGIZ M.", "respondent": "CHE", "articles": "10;10-1;10-2;16;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Aksu v. Turkey ([GC], nos. 4149\/04 and 41029\/04, \u00a7 67, ECHR 2012;Al-Adsani v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 35763\/97, \u00a7\u00a7 56, 57 and 60-66, ECHR 2001-XI;Al Jedda v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 27021\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 100-106, ECHR 2011;Altu\u011f Taner Ak\u00e7am v. Turkey, no 27520\/07, 25 October 2011;Animal Defenders International v. the United Kingdom ([GC], no 48876\/08, ECHR 2013;Association de citoyens Radko and Paunkovski v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (no 74651\/01, \u00a7\u00a7 69 and 74, ECHR 2009 (extracts);Axel Springer AG v. Germany ([GC], no 39954\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 85-88, 7 February 2012;Balsyt\u0117-Lideikien\u0117 v. Lithuania, no 72596\/01, 4 November 2008;Ba\u015fkaya and Ok\u00e7uo\u011flu v. Turkey [GC], nos. 23536\/94 and 24408\/94, \u00a7 49, ECHR 1999 IV;Bosphorus Hava Yollar\u0131 Turizm ve Ticaret Anonim \u015eirketi v. Ireland [GC], no 45036\/98, \u00a7\u00a7 149-151, ECHR 2005-VI;Brogan and Others v. the United Kingdom, 29 November 1988, \u00a7 59, Series A no 145-B;Capital Bank AD v. Bulgaria, no 49429\/99, \u00a7 110, 24 November 2005;Castells v. Spain, 23 April 1992, \u00a7 39, Series A no 236;Centre de ressources juridiques au nom de Valentin C\u00e2mpeanu v. Romania [GC], no 47848\/08, \u00a7 166, ECHR 2014;Ceylan v. Turkey [GC], no 23556\/94, \u00a7 34, ECHR 1999-IV;Chauvy and Others v. France, no 64915\/01, ECHR 2004-VI;Chorherr v. Austria, 25 August 1993, \u00a7\u00a7 7-8 and 28, Series A no 266-B;Cox v. Turkey, no 2933\/03, \u00a7\u00a7 27-45, 20 May 2010;Cudak v. Lithuania [GC], no 15869\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 57 and 63-67, ECHR 2010;D.I. v. Germany, no 26551\/95, decision of the Commission of 26 June 1996;Del R\u00edo Prada v. Spain [GC], no 42750\/09, ECHR 2013;Dink v. Turkey, nos. 2668\/07, 6102\/08, 30079\/08, 7072\/09 and 7124\/09, 14 September 2010;Dzhugashvili v. Russia ((dec.), no 41123\/10, \u00a7\u00a7 26-35, 9 December 2014;Editions Plon v. France, no 58148\/00, \u00a7 53, ECHR 2004-IV;Erbakan v. Turkey, no 59405\/00, \u00a7 59, 6 July 2006;Erdo\u011fdu and \u0130nce v. Turkey [GC], nos. 25067\/94 and 25068\/94, \u00a7 59, ECHR 1999-IV;F\u00e1ber v. Hungary, no 40721\/08, 24 July 2012;Falakao\u011flu and Sayg\u0131l\u0131 v. Turkey, nos. 22147\/02 and 24972\/03, \u00a7 33, 23 January 2007;Faruk Temel v. Turkey, no 16853\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 8 and 60, 1 February 2011;Fatullayev v. Azerbaijan, no 40984\/07, \u00a7 87, 22 April 2010;F\u00e9ret v. Belgium, no 15615\/07, 16 July 2009;Garaudy v. France (dec.), no 65831\/01, ECHR 2003-IX;Giniewski v. France, no 64016\/00, \u00a7 51, ECHR 2006-I;G\u00f6kta\u015f v. Turkey (dec.), no 59374\/10, 13 December 2011;Golder v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1975, Series A no 18;Gollnisch v. France (dec.), no 48135\/08, 7 June 2011;Gorzelik and Others v. Poland [GC], no 44158\/98, \u00a7 65, ECHR 2004-I;Grigoriades v. Greece, 25 November 1997, \u00a7 50, Reports 1997-VII;G\u00fcder v. Turkey (dec.), no 24695\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 64-65, 30 April 2013;G\u00fcnd\u00fcz v. Turkey, no 35071\/97, \u00a7\u00a7 48 and 51, ECHR 2003-XI;H., W., P. and K. v. Austria, no 12774\/87, decision of the Commission of 12 October 1989, DR 62, p. 216;Hachette Filipacchi Associ\u00e9s v. France, no 71111\/01, \u00a7 47, 14 June 2007;Hizb ut-Tahrir and Others v. Germany (dec.), no 31098\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 73-74 and 78, 12 June 2012;Honsik v. Austria, no 25062\/94, decision of the Commission of 18 October 1995, DR 83-B, p. 77;Incal v. Turkey, 9 June 1998, \u00a7 50, Reports 1998-IV;Jahn and Others v. Germany [GC], nos. 46720\/99, 72203\/01 and 72552\/01, \u00a7 116, ECHR 2005-VI;Jel\u0161evar and Others v. Slovenia (dec.), no 47318\/07, \u00a7 37, 11 March 2014;Jersild v. Denmark, 23 September 1994, \u00a7\u00a7 28, 30 and 31, Series A no 298;Jobe v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no 48278\/09, 14 June 2011;John Anthony Mizzi v. Malta, no 17320\/10, \u00a7 39, 22 November 2011;Jones and Others v. the United Kingdom, nos. 34356\/06 and 40528\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 189, 196-198 and 201-215, ECHR 2014;Jorgic v. Germany, no 74613\/01, \u00a7\u00a7 109-113, ECHR 2007-III;Karabulut v. Turkey (dec.), no 32197\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 64-65, 17 September 2013;Karademirci and Others v. Turkey, nos. 37096\/97 and 37101\/97, \u00a7 42, ECHR 2005-I;Karata\u015f v. Turkey [GC], no 23168\/94, \u00a7\u00a7 51-52, ECHR 1999-IV;Kasymakhunov and Saybatalov v. Russia, nos. 26261\/05 and 26377\/06, 14 March 2013;Kire\u00e7tepe and Others v. Turkey (dec.), no 59194\/10, 7 February 2012;Klein v. Slovakia, no 72208\/01, \u00a7 51, 31 October 2006;Kononov v. Latvia [GC], no 36376\/04, \u00a7 185, ECHR 2010;Le Pen v. France (dec.), no 18788\/09, 20 April 2010;Lehideux and Isorni v. France, 23 September 1998, \u00a7 53, Reports 1998 VII;Leyla \u015eahin v. Turkey [GC], no 44774\/98, ECHR 2005-XI;Lindon, Otchakovsky-Laurens and July v. France [GC], nos. 21279\/02 and 36448\/02, ECHR 2007-IV;Marais v. France, no 31159\/96, decision of the Commission of 24 June 1996, DR 86-A, p. 184;Minelli v. Switzerland, 25 March 1983, \u00a7 35, Series A no 62;Monnat v. Switzerland, no 73604\/01, ECHR 2006-X;Mouvement ra\u00eblien suisse v. Switzerland [GC], no 16354\/06, \u00a7 48, ECHR 2012;M\u00fcller and Others v. Switzerland, 24 May 1988, \u00a7 29, Series A no 133;Nachtmann v. Austria, no 36773\/97, decision of the Commission of 9 September 1998;Nada v. Switzerland [GC], no 10593\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 168 172, ECHR 2012;National Union of Rail, Maritime and Transport Workers v. the United Kingdom, no 31045\/10, \u00a7 98, ECHR 2014;Nationaldemokratische Partei Deutschlands Bezirksverband M\u00fcnchen-Oberbayern v. Germany, no 25992\/94, decision of the Commission of 29 November 1995, DR 84-B, p. 149;Norwood v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no 23131\/03, ECHR 2004-XI;Observer and Guardian v. the United Kingdom, 26 November 1991, \u00a7 68, Series A no 216;Ochensberger v. Austria, no 21318\/93, decision of the Commission of 2 September 1994;Olsson v. Sweden (no 1), 24 March 1988, \u00a7 62, Series A no 130;Orban and Others v. France, no 20985\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 46, 49 and 51, 15 January 2009;Otegi Mondragon v. Spain, no 2034\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 10 and 53-54, ECHR 2011;\u00d6zg\u00fcr G\u00fcndem v. Turkey, no 23144\/93, \u00a7 64, ECHR 2000-III;\u00d6zkan v. Turkey (dec.), no 15869\/09, 13 December 2011;\u00d6zt\u00fcrk v. Turkey [GC], no 22479\/93, \u00a7 54, ECHR 1999-VI;Paksas v. Lithuania [GC], no 34932\/04, \u00a7 87 in fine, ECHR 2011 (extracts);Pavel Ivanov v. Russia (dec.), no 35222\/04, 20 February 2007;Perin\u00e7ek v. Turkey, no 46669\/99, 21 June 2005;Pessino v. France, no 40403\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 34-36, 10 October 2006;Piermont v. France, 27 April 1995, \u00a7 64, Series A no 314;Plattform \u00ab \u00c4rzte f\u00fcr das Leben \u00bb v. Austria, 21 June 1988, \u00a7\u00a7 12-13, 19 and 37-38, Series A no 139;Putistin v. Ukraine, no 16882\/03, \u00a7\u00a7 33 and 36-41, 21 November 2013;Radio France and Others v. France, no 53984\/00, ECHR 2004-II;Rebhandl v. Austria, no 24398\/94, decision of the Commission of 16 January 1996;Refah Partisi (the Welfare Party) and Others v. Turkey [GC], nos. 41340\/98, 41342\/98, 41343\/98 and 41344\/98, ECHR 2003-II;Rekv\u00e9nyi v. Hungary [GC], no 25390\/94, ECHR 1999-III;Remer v. Germany, no 25096\/94, decision of the Commission of 6 September 1995, DR 82-B, p. 117;Rohlena v. the Czech Republic [GC], no 59552\/08, \u00a7 50, ECHR 2015;S.A.S. v. France [GC], no 43835\/11, \u00a7 117, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Saadi v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 13229\/03, \u00a7 62, ECHR 2008;Sayg\u0131l\u0131 and Falakao\u011flu v. Turkey (no 2), no 38991\/02, \u00a7 28, 17 February 2009;Schimanek v. Austria (dec.), no 32307\/96, 1 February 2000;Seurot v. France (dec.), no 57383\/00, 18 May 2004;Smolorz v. Poland, no 17446\/07, \u00a7 38, 16 October 2012;Socialist Party and Others v. Turkey and Others v. Turkey, 25 May 1998, Reports 1998-III;Soros v. France, no 50425\/06, \u00a7 58, 6 October 2011;Soulas and Others v. France, no 15948\/03, 10 July 2008;Stankov and the United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden v. Bulgaria, nos. 29221\/95 and 29225\/95, \u00a7\u00a7 102 and 106, ECHR 2001-IX;Stoll v. Switzerland [GC], no 69698\/01, ECHR 2007-V;Sunday Times v. the United Kingdom (no 1), 26 April 1979, \u00a7\u00a7 48-49, Series A no 30;S\u00fcrek v. Turkey (no 1) [GC], no 26682\/95, \u00a7\u00a7 52 and 62, ECHR 1999-IV;S\u00fcrek v. Turkey (no 3) [GC], no 24735\/94, \u00a7 40, 8 July 1999;T. v. Belgium, no 9777\/82, decision of the Commission of 14 July 1983, DR 34, p. 158;Tammer v. Estonia, no 41205\/98, \u00a7 37, ECHR 2001-I;Tekin v. Turkey (dec.), no 3501\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 64 65, 18 November 2014;The United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden \u2013 PIRIN and Others v. Bulgaria,no 59489\/00, \u00a7 61, 20 October 2005;United Communist Party of Turkey and Others v. Turkey, 30 January 1998, \u00a7 32, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-I;Vajnai v. Hungary, no 33629\/06, \u00a7 49, ECHR 2008;Van Anraat v. the Netherlands (dec.), no 65389\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 90-92, 6 July 2010,;Varela Geis v. Spain, no 61005\/09, 5 March 2013;Vejdeland and Others v. Sweden, no 1813\/07, \u00a7 54, 9 February 2012;Vogt v. Germany, 26 September 1995, \u00a7 52, Series A no 323;Von Hannover v. Germany (no 2) ([GC], nos. 40660\/08 and 60641\/08, ECHR 2012;Vona v. Hungary, no 35943\/10, ECHR 2013;W.P. and Others v. Poland (dec.), no 42264\/98, 2 September 2004;Walendy v. Germany, no 21128\/92, decision of the Commission of 11 January 1995, DR 80-B, p. 94;Weber v. Switzerland, 22 May 1990, \u00a7 51, Series A no 177;Wemhoff v. Germany, 27 June 1968, p. 23, \u00a7 8, Series A no 7;Wingrove v. the United Kingdom, 25 November 1996, \u00a7 58, Reports 1996-V;Witold Litwa v. Poland, no 26629\/95, ECHR 2000-III;Witzsch v. Germany (no 1) (dec.), no 41448\/98, 20 April 1999;Witzsch v. Germany (no 2) (dec.), no 7485\/03, 13 December 2005;Women On Waves and Others v. Portugal, no 31276\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 28-44, 3 February 2009;X. v. the Federal Republic of Germany, no 9235\/81, decision of the Commission of 16 July 1982, Decisions and Reports (DR) 29, p. 194;Y\u0131ld\u0131r\u0131m v. Turkey (dec.), no 50693\/10, \u00a7\u00a7 43-44, 17 March 2015;Zana v. Turkey, 25 November 1997, \u00a7\u00a7 57-60, Reports 1997 VII;\u017ddanoka v. Latvia [GC], no 58278\/00, ECHR 2006-IV", "external_sources": "Article 33 \u00a7 1 of the 1969 Vienna Convention;EU Framework Decision 2008\/913\/JHA;Article 4 of the 1965 International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (CERD);Resolution 68 (30) of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe;Article 6 \u00a7 1 of the Additional Protocol to the Convention on Cybercrime;Articles II and III c) of the Convention on Genocide;Articles 19 \u00a7 3 and 20 \u00a7 2 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR);Article 6 of the Rome Statute", "conclusion": "Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression -{General} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Ale\u0161 Pejchal;Andr\u00e1s Saj\u00f3;Andr\u00e9 Potocki;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Dean Spielmann;Egidijus K\u016bris;Guido Raimondi;Helen Keller;Helena J\u00e4derblom;J\u00e1n \u0160ikuta;Johannes Silvis;Josep Casadevall;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Mark Villiger;Neboj\u0161a Vu\u010dini\u0107;Nicolas Bratza;P\u00e4ivi Hirvel\u00e4;Paulo Pinto De Albuquerque;Peer Lorenzen;Stefan Trechsel;Vincent A. De Gaetano", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1015JUD002751008" }, "308": { "webcast_id": "2751008_28012015", "hearing_date": "2015-01-28 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Perin\u00e7ek v. Switzerland (no. 27510\/08)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "27510\/08", "case_id": "001-139724", "case_name": "CASE OF PER\u0130N\u00c7EK v. SWITZERLAND", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-139724", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2013-12-17 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 3, "court": "5", "issue": "Article 261bis of the Criminal Code", "represented_by": "CENGIZ M.", "respondent": "CHE", "articles": "10;10-1;10-2;35;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Animal Defenders International v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 48876\/08, \u00a7 100, 22 April 2013;Castells v. Spain, 23 April 1992, \u00a7 43, Series A no 236;Chauvy and Others v. France, no. 64915\/01, \u00a7 78, ECHR 2004 VI;Cox v. Turkey, no 2933\/03, 20 May 2010;De Haes and Gijsels v. Belgium, 24 February 1997, \u00a7 46, Reports 1997-I;Dink v. Turkey, nos. 2668\/07, 6102\/08, 30079\/08, 7072\/09 and 7124\/09, 14 September 2010;Editions Plon v. France, no 58148\/00, \u00a7 53, ECHR 2004-IV;Erbakan v. Turkey, no 59405\/00, 6 July 2006;Erdo\u011fdu and \u0130nce v. Turkey [GC], nos. 25067\/94 and 25068\/94, ECHR 1999 IV;F\u00e9ret v. Belgium, no 15615\/07, \u00a7 73, 16 July 2009;Garaudy v. France (dec.), no 65831\/01, ECHR 2003-IX (extracts);Gaw\u0119da v. Poland, no 26229\/95, \u00a7 39, ECHR 2002-II;Giniewski v. France, no 64016\/00, ECHR 2006 I;G\u00fcnd\u00fcz v. Turkey, no 35071\/97, ECHR 2003 XI;Ivanov v. Russia (dec.), no 35222\/04, 20 February 2007;Jersild v. Denmark, 23 September 1994, Series A no 298;Kern v. Germany (dec.), no 26870\/04, 29 May 2007;Kokkinakis v. Greece, 25 May 1993, \u00a7 40, Series A no 260-A;Kopp v. Switzerland, 25 March 1998, \u00a7 59, Reports 1998-II;Kruslin v. France, 24 April 1990, \u00a7 29, Series A no 176-A;Lehideux and Isorni v. France, 23 September 1998, Reports 1998 VII;Leroy v. France, no 36109\/03, 2 October 2008;Lingens v. Austria, 8 July 1986, \u00a7 42, Series A no 103;Lopes Gomes da Silva v. Portugal, no 37698\/97, \u00a7 36, ECHR 2000 X;Maestri v. Italy [GC], no 39748\/98, \u00a7 30, ECHR 2004-I;Molnar v. Romania (dec.), no 16637\/06, 23 October 2012;Monnat v. Switzerland, no 73604\/01, ECHR 2006 X;Mouvement ra\u00eblien suisse v. Switzerland [GC], no 16354\/06, \u00a7 48, ECHR 2012;Norwood v. the United Kingdom, no 23131\/03, 16 November 2004;Orban and Others v. France, no 20985\/05, \u00a7 34, 15 January 2009;Rekv\u00e9nyi v. Hungary [GC], no 25390\/94, \u00a7 34, ECHR 1999 III;Rotaru v. Romania [GC], no 28341\/95, \u00a7 52, ECHR 2000-V;Stoll v. Switzerland [GC], no 69698\/01, \u00a7 101, ECHR 2007 V;Sunday Times v. the United Kingdom (no 1), 26 April 1979, \u00a7 49, Series A no 30;Thorgeir Thorgeirson v. Iceland, 25 June 1992, \u00a7 63, Series A no 239;Vgt Verein gegen Tierfabriken v. Switzerland, no 24699\/94, \u00a7 52, ECHR 2001-VI;Vogt v. Germany, 26 September 1995, \u00a7 48, Series A no 323;Wingrove v. the United Kingdom, 25 November 1996, \u00a7 58, Reports 1996 V;Winterwerp v. the Netherlands, judgment of 24 October 1979, \u00a7 46, Series A no 33", "external_sources": "Declaration of 24 April 2013 (no. 542, Doc. 13192) from twenty members of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe;Article 2 of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide on 9 December 1948;Article 5 of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court adopted on 17 July 1998;Judgment of 2 September 1998 of the Chamber of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda in the case of The Prosecutor v. Akayesu (no. ICTR-96-4-T);Judgment of 26 February 2007 of the International Court of Justice in the case concerning Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro) (ICJ Reports 2007);Judgment of 7 November 2007 (no. 235\/2007) of the Spanish Constitutional Court;Case of Robert Faurisson v. France, determined by the UN Human Rights Committee on 8 November 1996, Communication no. 550\/1993, doc. CCPR\/C\/58\/D\/550\/1993 (1996);Article 6, sub-paragraph (c), of the Charter of the (Nuremberg) International Military Tribunal, annexed to the London Agreement of 8 August 1945;Study dated 19 December 2006 by the Swiss Institute of Comparative Law;Article 607.2 of the Spanish Criminal Code;French law no. 2001-70 of 29 January 2001 on recognition of the 1915 Armenian genocide;General Comment no. 34 on freedom of opinion and expression concerning Article 19 of the Covenant adopted by the UN Human Rights Committee", "conclusion": "Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression -{General} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed;Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Andr\u00e1s Saj\u00f3;Eckart Klein;Guido Raimondi;Helen Keller;Neboj\u0161a Vu\u010dini\u0107;Paulo Pinto De Albuquerque;Peer Lorenzen", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1217JUD002751008" }, "309": { "webcast_id": "2570311_21012015", "hearing_date": "2015-01-21 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Dvorski v. Croatia (no. 25703\/11)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "25703\/11", "case_id": "001-158266", "case_name": "CASE OF DVORSKI v. CROATIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-158266", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2015-10-20 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Articles 177 \u00a7 5 and 502 of the Code of Criminal Procedure", "represented_by": "MAROSEVAC CAPKO S.", "respondent": "HRV", "articles": "6;6+6-3-c;6-1;6-3-c;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Airey v. Ireland, 9 October 1979, \u00a7 24, Series A no. 32;Aras v. Turkey (no. 2), no. 15065\/07, \u00a7 62, 18 November 2014;Artico v. Italy, 13 May 1980, \u00a7 33, Series A no. 37;Baloga v. Ukraine, no. 620\/05, \u00a7 38, 16 September 2010;Bykov v. Russia [GC], no. 4378\/02, \u00a7 103, 10 March 2009;Croissant v. Germany, 25 September 1992, \u00a7 29-31, Series A no. 237-B;Dayanan v. Turkey, no. 7377\/03, \u00a7 32, 13 October 2009;De Jong, Baljet and Van den Brink v. the Netherlands, 22 May 1984, \u00a7 48, Series A no. 77;Delcourt v. Belgium, 17 January 1970, \u00a7 31, Series A no. 11;Denk v. Austria, no. 23396\/09, \u00a7 24, 5 December 2013;Erkapi\u0107 v. Croatia, no. 51198\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 80-82, 25 April 2013;Goddi v. Italy, 9 April 1984, \u00a7 30, Series A no. 76;G\u00fcrkan v. Turkey, no. 10987\/10, \u00a7 26, 3 July 2012;Hanif and Khan v. the United Kingdom, nos. 52999\/08 and 61779\/08, \u00a7 155, 20 December 2011;Horvati\u0107 v. Croatia, no. 36044\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 80-82, 17 October 2013;Imbrioscia v. Switzerland, 24 November 1993, \u00a7\u00a7 36-38, Series A no. 275;Klimentyev v. Russia, no. 46503\/99, \u00a7\u00a7 116-118, 16 November 2006;Lisica v. Croatia, no. 20100\/06, \u00a7 60, 25 February 2010;Magee v. the United Kingdom, no. 28135\/95, \u00a7 45, ECHR 2000 VI;Maresti v. Croatia, no. 55759\/07, \u00a7 75, 25 June 2009;Martin v. Estonia, no. 35985\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 90-97, 30 May 2013;Mayzit v. Russia, no. 63378\/00, 20 January 2005;Meftah and Others v. France [GC], nos. 32911\/96, 35237\/97 and 34595\/97, \u00a7\u00a7 45-48, ECHR 2002 VII;Moser v. Austria, no. 12643\/02, \u00a7 108, 21 September 2006;Panovits v. Cyprus, no. 4268\/04, 11 December 2008;Pavlenko v. Russia, no. 42371\/02, 1 April 2010;Pishchalnikov v. Russia, no. 7025\/04, \u00a7 77-79, 24 September 2009;Poitrimol v. France, 23 November 1993, \u00a7 31, Series A no. 277-A;Popov v. Russia, no. 26853\/04, \u00a7 173, 13 July 2006;Prehn v. Germany (dec.), no. 40451\/06, 24 August 2010;Salduz v. Turkey [GC], no. 36391\/02, ECHR 2008;Sejdovic v. Italy [GC], no. 56581\/00, \u00a7 86, ECHR 2006-II;Vitan v. Romania, no. 42084\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 58-64, 25 March 2008;Zagorodniy v. Ukraine, no. 27004\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 52-55, 24 November 2011", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Violation of Article 6+6-3-c - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing) (Article 6-3-c - Defence through legal assistance;Legal assistance of his own choosing;Article 6 - Right to a fair trial);Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Dean Spielmann;Dmitry Dedov;Erik M\u00f8se;Guido Raimondi;Helen Keller;Isabelle Berro-Lef\u00e8vre;J\u00e1n \u0160ikuta;Johannes Silvis;Jon Fridrik Kj\u00f8lbro;Josep Casadevall;Julia Laffranque;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Luis L\u00f3pez Guerra;Mark Villiger;Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska;P\u00e4ivi Hirvel\u00e4;Paul Mahoney;Paulo Pinto De Albuquerque;Zdravka Kalaydjieva;Ksenija Turkovi\u0107", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1020JUD002570311" }, "310": { "webcast_id": "2570311_21012015", "hearing_date": "2015-01-21 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Dvorski v. Croatia (no. 25703\/11)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "25703\/11", "case_id": "001-138579", "case_name": "CASE OF DVORSKI v. CROATIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-138579", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2013-11-28 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 3, "court": "4", "issue": "Article 177 \u00a7 5 of the Code of Criminal Procedure", "represented_by": "MAROSEVAC CAPKO S.", "respondent": "HRV", "articles": "3;6;6+6-3-c;6-1;6-3-c;35", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Airey v. Ireland, 9 October 1979, \u00a7 24, Series A no. 32;Al-Khawaja and Tahery v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 26766\/05 and 22228\/06, \u00a7 118, ECHR 2011;Benham v. the United Kingdom, 10 June 1996, \u00a7 52, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 III;Bogumil v. Portugal, no. 35228\/03, \u00a7 46, 7 October 2008;Bykov v. Russia [GC], no. 4378\/02, 10 March 2009;Campbell and Fell v. the United Kingdom, 28 June 1984, \u00a7 99, Series A no. 80;Croissant v. Germany, 25 September 1992, \u00a7\u00a7 29 and 30, Series A no. 237-B;Czekalla v. Portugal, no. 38830\/97, \u00a7 60, ECHR 2002 VIII;Desde v. Turkey, no. 23909\/03, \u00a7 130, 1 February 2011;G\u00e4fgen v. Germany [GC], no. 22978\/05, \u00a7 187, ECHR 2010;G\u00fcve\u00e7 v. Turkey, no. 70337\/01, \u00a7\u00a7 130-131, ECHR 2009;Hirsi Jamaa and Others v. Italy [GC], no. 27765\/09, ECHR 2012;Imbrioscia v. Switzerland, 24 November 1993, \u00a7 38, Series A no. 275;Ireland v. the United Kingdom, 18 January 1978, \u00a7 161, Series A no. 25;Klimentyev v. Russia, no. 46503\/99, \u00a7\u00a7 116-119, 16 November 2006;Krombach v. France, no. 29731\/96, ECHR 2001 II;Kud\u0142a v. Poland [GC], no. 30210\/96, ECHR 2000-XI;Kulikowski v. Poland, no. 18353\/03, \u00a7 55, 19 May 2009;Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772\/95, \u00a7 119-121, ECHR 2000-IV;Luchaninova v. Ukraine, no. 16347\/02, \u00a7 62, 9 June 2011;Magee v. the United Kingdom, no. 28135\/95, \u00a7 45, ECHR 2000 VI;Mama\u00e7 and Others v. Turkey, nos. 29486\/95, 29487\/95 and 29853\/96, \u00a7 48, 20 April 2004;Martin v. Estonia, no. 35985\/09, \u00a7 95-97, 30 May 2013;Neziraj v. Germany, no. 30804\/07, \u00a7 45, 8 November 2012;O\u2019Kane v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 30550\/96, 6 July 1999;Pakelli v. Germany, 25 April 1983, \u00a7 31, Series A no. 64;Pavlenko v. Russia, no. 42371\/02, \u00a7 98, 1 April 2010;Peers v. Greece, no. 28524\/95, \u00a7 67, ECHR 2001-III;Pishchalnikov v. Russia, no. 7025\/04, \u00a7\u00a7 77-79, 24 September 2009;Poitrimol v. France, 23 November 1993, \u00a7 29, Series A no. 277 A;Prehn v. Germany (dec.), no. 40451\/06, 24 August 2010;Riviere v. France, no. 33834\/03, \u00a7 62, 11 July 2006;Rowe and Davis v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 28901\/95, \u00a7 60, ECHR 2000-II;Ryabov v. Russia, no. 3896\/04, \u00a7\u00a7 40 and 43, 31 January 2008;Sakhnovskiy v. Russia [GC], no. 21272\/03, \u00a7 94, 2 November 2010;Salduz v. Turkey [GC], no. 36391\/02, 27 November 2008;Sar\u0131kaya v. Turkey, no. 36115\/97, \u00a7 67, 22 April 2004;Stanford v. the United Kingdom, 23 February 1994, \u00a7 28, Series A no. 282 A;Velikova v. Bulgaria, no. 41488\/98, \u00a7 50, ECHR 2000-VI;Whitfield and Others v. the United Kingdom, nos. 46387\/99, 48906\/99, 57410\/00 and 57419\/00, \u00a7 48, 12 April 2005;Zagorodniy v. Ukraine, no. 27004\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 51-52, 24 November 2011", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Remainder inadmissible;No violation of Article 6+6-3-c - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing) (Article 6 - Right to a fair trial;Article 6-3-c - Defence through legal assistance;Legal assistance of his own choosing)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Dmitry Dedov;Erik M\u00f8se;Isabelle Berro-Lef\u00e8vre;Julia Laffranque;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska;Ksenija Turkovi\u0107", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1128JUD002570311" }, "311": { "webcast_id": "1051110_14012015", "hearing_date": "2015-01-14 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Murray v. the Netherlands (no. 10511\/10)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "10511\/10", "case_id": "001-162614", "case_name": "CASE OF MURRAY v. THE NETHERLANDS", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-162614", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2016-04-26 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "", "represented_by": "REIJNTJES-WENDENBURG C.", "respondent": "NLD", "articles": "3;34;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "A. and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 3455\/05, \u00a7 128, ECHR 2009;Aerts v. Belgium, 30 July 1998, \u00a7 66, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-V;Bodein v. France, no. 40014\/10, \u00a7 61, 13 November 2014;Carrella v. Italy, no. 33955\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 48-51, 9 September 2014;Creang\u0103 v. Romania [GC], no. 29226\/03, \u00a7 130, 23 February 2012;Dickson v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 44362\/04, \u00a7 28, ECHR 2007 V;G\u00e4fgen v. Germany [GC], no. 22978\/05, \u00a7 123, ECHR 2010;Harakchiev and Tolumov v. Bulgaria, nos. 15018\/11 and 61199\/12, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Herczegfalvy v. Austria, 24 September 1992, \u00a7 82, Series A no. 244;James, Wells and Lee v. the United Kingdom, nos. 25119\/09, 57715\/09 and 57877\/09, 18 September 2012;K. and T. v. Finland [GC], no. 25702\/94, ECHR 2001 VII;Kafkaris v. Cyprus [GC], no. 21906\/04, ECHR 2008;Khoroshenko v. Russia [GC], no. 41418\/04, \u00a7\u00a7 121 and 144 145, ECHR 2015;Kud\u0142a v. Poland [GC], no. 30210\/96, \u00a7 94, ECHR 2000 XI;Larionovs and Tess v. Latvia (dec.), nos. 45520\/04 and 19363\/05, \u00a7 172, 25 November 2014;L\u00e1szl\u00f3 Magyar v. Hungary, no. 73593\/10, 20 May 2014;M.S.S. v. Belgium and Greece [GC], no. 30696\/09, \u00a7 418, ECHR 2011;Maiorano and Others v. Italy, no. 28634\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 115 122, 15 December 2009;Malhous v. the Czech Republic (dec.) [GC], no. 33071\/96, ECHR 2000 XII;Mastromatteo v. Italy [GC], no. 37703\/97, \u00a7 72, ECHR 2002 VIII;Nada v. Switzerland [GC], no. 10593\/08, \u00a7 128, ECHR 2012;Naumenko v. Ukraine, no. 42023\/98, \u00a7 112, 10 February 2004;\u00d6calan v. Turkey (no. 2), nos. 24069\/03, 197\/04, 6201\/06 and 10464\/07, \u00a7 203, 18 March 2014;Raffray Taddei v. France, no. 36435\/07, 21 December 2010;S\u0142awomir Musia\u0142 v. Poland, no. 28300\/06, \u00a7 87, 20 January 2009;Trabelsi v. Belgium, no. 140\/10, \u00a7 137, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Vinter and Others v. the United Kingdom, [GC], nos. 66069\/09, 130\/10 and 3896\/10, ECHR 2013 (extracts)", "external_sources": "Report of the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) on its visit to Aruba and the Netherlands Antilles in 2007", "conclusion": "Preliminary objections dismissed (Article 34 - Locus standi;Victim);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading punishment;Inhuman punishment) (Substantive aspect);Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Alvina Gyulumyan;Andr\u00e1s Saj\u00f3;Andr\u00e9 Potocki;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Corneliu B\u00eersan;Dean Spielmann;Erik M\u00f8se;Ganna Yudkivska;Guido Raimondi;J\u00e1n \u0160ikuta;Jean-Paul Costa;Johannes Silvis;Jon Fridrik Kj\u00f8lbro;Josep Casadevall;Julia Laffranque;Khanlar Hajiyev;Kristina Pardalos;Neboj\u0161a Vu\u010dini\u0107;Nona Tsotsoria;Paul Mahoney;Paulo Pinto De Albuquerque", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0426JUD001051110" }, "312": { "webcast_id": "1051110_14012015", "hearing_date": "2015-01-14 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Murray v. the Netherlands (no. 10511\/10)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "10511\/10", "case_id": "001-138893", "case_name": "CASE OF MURRAY v. THE NETHERLANDS", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-138893", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2013-12-10 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "6", "issue": "", "represented_by": "WENDENBURG C.", "respondent": "NLD", "articles": "3", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading punishment;Inhuman punishment) (Substantive aspect);No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect)", "separate_opinion": "FALSE", "judges": "Alvina Gyulumyan;Corneliu B\u00eersan;J\u00e1n \u0160ikuta;Johannes Silvis;Josep Casadevall;Kristina Pardalos;Nona Tsotsoria", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1210JUD001051110" }, "313": { "webcast_id": "4604314_07012015", "hearing_date": "2015-01-07 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Lambert and Others v. France (no. 46043\/14)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "46043\/14", "case_id": "001-155352", "case_name": "CASE OF LAMBERT AND OTHERS v. FRANCE", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-155352", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2015-06-05 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Articles L. 1110-1, 1110-2, 1110-5, 1110-9 and 1110-10, Articles L. 1111-4, 1111-6 and 1111-11 of the Public Health Code ; Act of 22 April 2005 on patients\u2019 rights and end-of-life issues (Leonetti Act) ; Articles R. 4127-37 and R. 4127-38 of the Code of Medical Ethics ; Articles L. 521-2 and R. 625-3 of the Administrative Courts Code", "represented_by": "PAILLOT J. ; TRIOMPHE J.", "respondent": "FRA", "articles": "2;2-1;34;35", "strasbourg_caselaw": "A, B and C v. Ireland [GC], no 25579\/05, \u00a7 237, ECHR 2010;A.K. and L. v. Croatia, no 37956\/11, \u00a7\u00a7 48-50, 8 January 2013;Ada Rossi and Others v. Italy (dec.), no 55185\/08, 16 December 2008;Burke v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no 19807\/06, 11 July 2006;Calvelli and Ciglio v. Italy [GC], no 32967\/96, \u00a7 49, ECHR 2002 I;Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin C\u00e2mpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848\/08, ECHR 2014;Ciecho\u0144ska v. Poland, no 19776\/04, \u00a7 65, 14 June 2011;Diamante and Pelliccioni v. Saint Marin, no 32250\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 146-147, 27 September 2011;Evans v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 6339\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 54-56, ECHR 2007 I;Giuliani and Gaggio v. Italy [GC], no 23458\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 174-177, ECHR 2011 (extracts);Glass v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no 61827\/00, 18 March 2003;Haas v. Switzerland, no 31322\/07, \u00a7 51, ECHR 2011;\u0130lhan v. Turkey [GC], no 22277\/93, \u00a7\u00a7 54-55, ECHR 2000 VII;Koch v. Germany, no 497\/09, 19 July 2012;L.C.B. v. the United Kingdom, 9 June 1998, \u00a7 36, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 III;McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, 27 September 1995, \u00a7\u00a7 146-147, Series A no 324;Nejdet \u015eahin and Perihan \u015eahin v. Turkey [GC], no 13279\/05, \u00a7 85, 20 October 2011;Nencheva and Others v. Bulgaria, no 48609\/06, 18 June 2013;Post v. the Netherlands (dec.), no 21727\/08, 20 January 2009;Powell v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no 45305\/99, ECHR 2000 V;Pretty v. the United Kingdom, no 2346\/02, ECHR 2002 III;Raw and Others v. France, no 10131\/11, \u00a7\u00a7 51-52, 7 March 2013;S.P., D.P. and A.T. v. the United Kingdom, no 23715\/94, decision of the Commission of 20 May 1996;Sanles Sanles v. Spain (dec.), no 48335\/99, ECHR 2000 XI;Scozzari and Giunta v. Italy [GC], nos. 39221\/98 and 41963\/98, \u00a7\u00a7 138-139, ECHR 2000 VIII;\u0160neersone and Kampanella v. Italy, no 14737\/09, \u00a7 61, 12 July 2011;Tauira and 18 others v. France, no 28204\/95, decision of the Commission of 4 December 1995, Decisions and Reports (DR) 83-A, p. 131;Verein gegen Tierfabriken Schweiz (VgT) v. Switzerland (no 2) [GC], no 32772\/02, \u00a7 83, ECHR 2009;Vo v. France [GC], no 53924\/00, \u00a7 89, ECHR 2004 VIII;Y.F. v. Turkey, no 24209\/94, \u00a7 31, ECHR 2003 IX \n\n", "external_sources": "Articles 1, 5, 6 and 9 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Dignity of the Human Being with regard to the Application of Biology and Medicine (Oviedo Convention);Guide on the decision-making process regarding medical treatment in end-of-life situations drawn up by the Committee on Bioethics of the Council of Europe;Recommendation CM\/Rec(2009)11 of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on principles concerning continuing powers of attorney and advance directives for incapacity;Recommendation 1418 (1999) of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe on protection of the human rights and dignity of the terminally ill and the dying;Parliamentary Assembly Resolution 1859 (2012) entitled \u201cProtecting human rights and dignity by taking into account previously expressed wishes of patients\u201d", "conclusion": "Preliminary objection allowed (Article 34 - Locus standi);Remainder inadmissible;No violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Life) (Substantive aspect) (Conditional)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Ale\u0161 Pejchal;Andr\u00e9 Potocki;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Dean Spielmann;Egidijus K\u016bris;Erik M\u00f8se;George Nicolaou;Guido Raimondi;Helena J\u00e4derblom;J\u00e1n \u0160ikuta;Khanlar Hajiyev;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Mark Villiger;Nona Tsotsoria;Vincent A. De Gaetano", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0605JUD004604314" }, "314": { "webcast_id": "1188210_17122014", "hearing_date": "2014-12-17 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Pentik\u00e4inen v. Finland (no. 11882\/10)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "11882\/10", "case_id": "001-158279", "case_name": "CASE OF PENTIK\u00c4INEN v. FINLAND", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-158279", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2015-10-20 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Section 19 of the Police Act, in Chapter 1 ; Section 2, subsection 2, of the Coercive Measures Act ; Chapter 16, section 4, of the Penal Code ; Section 24, subsection 2, of the Criminal Investigations Act", "represented_by": "SALOKANGAS J.", "respondent": "FIN", "articles": "10;10-1;10-2", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Animal Defenders International v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 48876\/08, \u00a7 100, ECHR 2013 (extracts);Bladet Troms\u00f8 and Stensaas v. Norway [GC], no. 21980\/93, ECHR 1999-III;Centro Europa 7 S.r.l. and Di Stefano v. Italy [GC], no. 38433\/09, \u00a7 140, ECHR 2012;Cump\u0103n\u0103 and Maz\u0103re v. Romania [GC], no. 33348\/96, \u00a7 116, ECHR 2004 XI;Dammann v. Switzerland, no. 77551\/01, \u00a7 52, 25 April 2006;De Haes and Gijsels v. Belgium, 24 February 1997, \u00a7 37, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997 I;Fressoz and Roire v. France [GC], no. 29183\/95, ECHR 1999 I;Gsell v. Switzerland, no. 12675\/05, \u00a7 49, 8 October 2009;Handyside v. the United Kingdom, 7 December 1976, \u00a7 49 in fine, Series A no. 24;Jersild v. Denmark, 23 September 1994, \u00a7 31, Series A no. 298;K. and T. v. Finland [GC], no. 25702\/94, \u00a7 141, ECHR 2001 VII;Kasabova v. Bulgaria, no. 22385\/03, \u00a7\u00a7 61 and 63-68, 19 April 2011;Kopp v. Switzerland, 25 March 1998, \u00a7 59, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-II;Krone Verlag GmbH v. Austria, no. 27306\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 46-47, 19 June 2012;Kruslin v. France, 24 April 1990, \u00a7 29, Series A no. 176-A;Monnat v. Switzerland, no. 73604\/01, \u00a7 66, ECHR 2006-X;Morice v. France [GC], no. 29369\/10, \u00a7 124, 23 April 2015;Najafli v. Azerbaijan, no. 2594\/07, \u00a7 67, 2 October 2012;Novaya Gazeta and Borodyanskiy v. Russia, no. 14087\/08, \u00a7 37, 28 March 2013;Perna v. Italy [GC], no. 48898\/99, \u00a7 47, ECHR 2003 V;Rotaru v. Romania [GC], no. 28341\/95, \u00a7 52, ECHR 2000-V;Stoll v. Switzerland [GC], no. 69698\/01, ECHR 2007 V;Taranenko v. Russia, no. 19554\/05, \u00a7 95, 15 May 2014;The Sunday Times v. the United Kingdom (no. 1), 26 April 1979, \u00a7 65, Series A no. 30;The Sunday Times v. the United Kingdom (no. 2), 26 November 1991, \u00a7 51, Series A no. 217;Times Newspapers Ltd v. the United Kingdom (nos. 1 and 2), nos. 3002\/03 and 23676\/03, ECHR 2009;Ungv\u00e1ry and Irodalom Kft v. Hungary, no. 64520\/10, \u00a7 42, 3 December 2013;Yordanova and Toshev v. Bulgaria, no. 5126\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 53 and 55, 2 October 2012", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "No violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression -{General} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Ale\u0161 Pejchal;Andr\u00e9 Potocki;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Dean Spielmann;Dmitry Dedov;Egidijus K\u016bris;Elisabeth Steiner;George Nicolaou;Guido Raimondi;Ineta Ziemele;Iulia Motoc;Johannes Silvis;Josep Casadevall;Khanlar Hajiyev;Kristina Pardalos;Ledi Bianku;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Mark Villiger;P\u00e4ivi Hirvel\u00e4;Paul Lemmens;Paul Mahoney;Robert Spano;Vincent A. De Gaetano", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1020JUD001188210" }, "315": { "webcast_id": "1188210_17122014", "hearing_date": "2014-12-17 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Pentik\u00e4inen v. Finland (no. 11882\/10)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "11882\/10", "case_id": "001-140395", "case_name": "CASE OF PENTIK\u00c4INEN v. FINLAND", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-140395", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2014-02-04 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 3, "court": "7", "issue": "Section 4 of the Penal Code", "represented_by": "RYTI R.", "respondent": "FIN", "articles": "10;10-1;10-2", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Barfod v. Denmark, 22 February 1989, \u00a7 28, Series A no. 149;Bladet Troms\u00f8 and Stensaas v. Norway [GC], no. 21980\/93, \u00a7 58, ECHR 1999-III;De Haes and Gijsels v. Belgium, 24 February 1997, \u00a7 37, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997 I;Fressoz and Roire v. France [GC], no. 29183\/95, \u00a7 45, ECHR 1999-I;Janowski v. Poland [GC], no. 25716\/94, \u00a7 30, ECHR 1999-I;Jersild v. Denmark, 23 September 1994, \u00a7 31, Series A no. 298;Juppala v. Finland, no. 18620\/03, \u00a7 40, 2 December 2008;Lingens v. Austria, 8 July 1986, Series A no. 103;Najafli v. Azerbaijan, no. 2594\/07, \u00a7 68, 2 October 2012;News Verlags GmbH & Co.KG v. Austria, no. 31457\/96, \u00a7 52, ECHR 2000-I;Nikula v. Finland, no. 31611\/96, \u00a7 44, ECHR 2002 II;Nilsen and Johnsen v. Norway [GC], no. 23118\/93, \u00a7 43, ECHR 1999-VIII;Sunday Times v. the United Kingdom (no. 1), 26 April 1979, Series A no. 30", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "No violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression -{General} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "George Nicolaou;Ineta Ziemele;Ledi Bianku;P\u00e4ivi Hirvel\u00e4;Paul Mahoney;Vincent A. De Gaetano", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0204JUD001188210" }, "316": { "webcast_id": "1188210_17122014", "hearing_date": "2014-12-17 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Pentik\u00e4inen v. Finland (no. 11882\/10)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "11882\/10", "case_id": "001-115953", "case_name": "PENTIKAINEN v. FINLAND", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-115953", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "2011-05-19 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "RYTI R.", "respondent": "FIN", "articles": "10", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Communicated", "separate_opinion": "FALSE", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "317": { "webcast_id": "580908_10122014", "hearing_date": "2014-12-10 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Al-Dulimi and Montana Management Inc. v. Switzerland (no. 5809\/08)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "5809\/08", "case_id": "001-164515", "case_name": "CASE OF AL-DULIMI AND MONTANA MANAGEMENT INC. v. SWITZERLAND", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-164515", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2016-06-21 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "", "represented_by": "MICHEL J.-C. ; OBEIDAT T. ; FRIES S.", "respondent": "CHE", "articles": "6;6-1;15;35;35-3-a;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "A\u00eft-Mouhoub v. France, 28 October 1998, \u00a7 52, Reports 1998-VIII;Al-Adsani v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 35763\/97, ECHR 2001 XI;Al-Jedda v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 27021\/08, \u00a7 76, ECHR 2011;Al Saadoon and Mufdhi v. the United Kingdom, no 61498\/08, \u00a7 128, ECHR 2010;Al-Skeini and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 55721\/07, \u00a7 141, ECHR 2011;Artico v. Italy, 13 May 1980, \u00a7 33, Series A no 37;Azinas v. Cyprus [GC], no 56679\/00, \u00a7 32, ECHR 2004 III;Balmer-Schafroth and Others v. Switzerland, 26 August 1997, \u00a7\u00a7 37-38, Reports 1997 IV;B\u011ble\u0161 and Others v. the Czech Republic, no 47273\/99, \u00a7 49, ECHR 2002-IX;Bosphorus Hava Yollar\u0131 Turizm ve Ticaret Anonim \u015eirketi v. Ireland ([GC], no 45036\/98, ECHR 2005 VI;Boulois v. Luxembourg [GC], no 37575\/04, \u00a7 90, ECHR 2012;Bryan v. the United Kingdom, 22 November 1995, \u00a7 45, Series A no 335-A;Chaudet v. France, no 49037\/06, \u00a7 37, 29 October 2009;Cyprus v. Turkey (just satisfaction) [GC], no 25781\/94, \u00a7 23, ECHR 2014;Cudak v. Lithuania [GC], no 15869\/02, ECHR 2010;D.H. and Others v. the Czech Republic [GC], no 57325\/00, \u00a7 109, ECHR 2007 IV;Demir and Baykara v. Turkey [GC], no 34503\/97, \u00a7 67, ECHR 2008;Fayed v. the United Kingdom, 21 September 1994, \u00a7 65, Series A no 294 B;Garc\u00eda Ruiz v. Spain [GC], no 30544\/96, \u00a7\u00a7 28-29, ECHR 1999-I;Gillberg v. Sweden [GC], no 41723\/06, \u00a7 54, 3 April 2012;Golder v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1975, \u00a7 36, Series A no 18;Gross v. Switzerland [GC], no 67810\/10, \u00a7 37, ECHR 2014;Kuri\u0107 and Others v. Slovenia [GC], no 26828\/06, \u00a7 234-235, ECHR 2012;Liep\u0101jnieks v. Latvia (dec.), no 37586\/06, \u00a7 95, 2 November 2010;Loizidou v. Turkey (merits), 18 December 1996, \u00a7 43, Reports 1996-VI;Loizidou v. Turkey (preliminary objection), 23 March 1995, \u00a7 75, Series A no 310;M.S.S. v. Belgium and Greece [GC], no 30696\/09, \u00a7 338, ECHR 2011;Masson and Van Zon v. the Netherlands, 28 September 1995, \u00a7 49, Series A no 327 A;Micallef v. Malta [GC], no 17056\/06, \u00a7 74, ECHR 2009;Michaud v. France, no 12323\/11, \u00a7\u00a7 102-104, ECHR 2012;Nada v. Switzerland ([GC], no 10593\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 177-178, ECHR 2012;Neulinger and Shuruk v. Switzerland [GC], no 41615\/07, \u00a7 88, ECHR 2010;Prince Hans-Adam II of Liechtenstein v. Germany [GC], no 42527\/98, \u00a7 43, ECHR 2001-VIII;Roche v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 32555\/96, ECHR 2005 X;Sigma Radio Television Ltd v. Cyprus, nos. 32181\/04 and 35122\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 151 157, 21 July 2011;Stichting Mothers of Srebrenica and Others v. the Netherlands (dec.), no 65542\/12, ECHR 2013 (extracts);Storck v. Germany, no 61603\/00, \u00a7 98, ECHR 2005-V;United Communist Party of Turkey and Others v. Turkey, 30 January 1998, \u00a7 29, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 I;Waite and Kennedy v. Germany [GC], no 26083\/94, \u00a7 59, ECHR 1999-I", "external_sources": "Articles 25 and 103, Chapter VII of the United Nations Charter;Article 14, International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights;Resolution 1597 (2008) of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe of 23 January 2008;United Nations Security Council Resolution 1730 (2006) of 19 December 2006;Paragraph 23, Resolution 1483 (2003) of the United Nations Security Council of 23 May 2003 under Chapter VII of the UN Charter", "conclusion": "Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione personae;Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Access to court;Civil rights and obligations);Damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Ale\u0161 Pejchal;Andr\u00e1s Saj\u00f3;Andr\u00e9 Potocki;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Annalisa Ciampi;Dean Spielmann;Dmitry Dedov;Egidijus K\u016bris;Eva Brems;Guido Raimondi;Helen Keller;Ineta Ziemele;Josep Casadevall;Julia Laffranque;Khanlar Hajiyev;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Luzius Wildhaber;Mark Villiger;Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska;Neboj\u0161a Vu\u010dini\u0107;Paulo Pinto De Albuquerque;Peer Lorenzen;Robert Spano;Vincent A. De Gaetano", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0621JUD000580908" }, "318": { "webcast_id": "580908_10122014", "hearing_date": "2014-12-10 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Al-Dulimi and Montana Management Inc. v. Switzerland (no. 5809\/08)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "5809\/08", "case_id": "001-138948", "case_name": "CASE OF AL-DULIMI AND MONTANA MANAGEMENT INC. v. SWITZERLAND", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-138948", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2013-11-26 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 2, "court": "5", "issue": "", "represented_by": "MICHEL J.-C.", "respondent": "CHE", "articles": "1;6;6-1;35;35-3;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "A\u00eft-Mouhoub v. France, 28 October 1998, \u00a7 52, Reports 1998-VIII;Al-Adsani v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 35763\/97, \u00a7 55, ECHR 2001-XI;Al-Jedda v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 27021\/08, ECHR 2011;Al-Saadoon and Mufdhi v. the United Kingdom, no 61498\/08, \u00a7 128, ECHR 2010;Al Skeini and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 55721\/07, ECHR 2011;Assanidze v. Georgia [GC], no 71503\/01, \u00a7 137, ECHR 2004-II;Bankovi\u0107 and Others v. Belgium and Others (dec.) [GC], no 52207\/99, ECHR 2001 XII;Behrami and Behrami v. France and Saramati v. France, Germany and Norway (dec.) [GC], nos. 71412\/01 and 78166\/01, 2 May 2007;B\u011ble\u0161 and Others v. the Czech Republic, no 47273\/99, \u00a7 49, ECHR 2002-IX;Blagojevi\u0107 v. the Netherlands (dec.), no 49032\/07, \u00a7 46, 9 June 2009;Bosphorus Hava Yollar\u0131 Turizm ve Ticaret Anonim \u015eirketi v. Ireland [GC], no 45036\/98, ECHR 2005 VI;Cudak v. Lithuania [GC], no 15869\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 54-55, ECHR 2010;Fayed v. the United Kingdom, 21 September 1994, \u00a7 65, Series A no 294-B;Fogarty v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 37112\/97, \u00a7 33, ECHR 2001-XI;Gali\u0107 v. the Netherlands (dec.), no 22617\/07, \u00a7 46, 9 June 2009;Gasparini v. Italy and Belgium (dec.), no 10750\/03, 12 May 2009;Gentilhomme, Schaff-Benhadji and Zerouki v. France, nos. 48205\/99, 48207\/99 and 48209\/99, \u00a7 20, 14 May 2002;Glor v. Switzerland, no 13444\/04, \u00a7 48, ECHR 2009;Golder v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1975, Series A no 18;Guerra and Others v. Italy, 19 February 1998, \u00a7 44, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 I;Ila\u015fcu and Others v. Moldova and Russia [GC], no 48787\/99, \u00a7\u00a7 311-312, ECHR 2004-VII;M.S.S. v. Belgium and Greece [GC], no 30696\/09, \u00a7 338, ECHR 2011;Michaud v. France, no 12323\/11, \u00a7 103, 6 December 2012;Nada v. Switzerland [GC], no 10593\/08, ECHR 2012;Neulinger and Shuruk v. Switzerland [GC], no 41615\/07, \u00a7 131, ECHR 2010;Prince Hans-Adam II of Liechtenstein v. Germany [GC], no 42527\/98, \u00a7 43, ECHR 2001-VIII;Rambus Inv. v. Germany (dec.), no 40382\/04, 16 June 2009;Soering v. the United Kingdom, 7 July 1989, \u00a7 86, Series A no 161;T.P. and K.M. v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 28945\/95, \u00a7 98, ECHR 2001-V;United Communist Party of Turkey and Others v. Turkey, 30 January 1998, \u00a7 29, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 I;Waite and Kennedy v. Germany [GC], no 26083\/94, \u00a7 59, ECHR 1999-I", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Preliminary objection dismissed (Article 35-3 - Ratione personae);Preliminary objection dismissed (Article 35-3 - Ratione materiae);Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Access to court;Civil rights and obligations);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Andr\u00e1s Saj\u00f3;Guido Raimondi;Helen Keller;Luzius Wildhaber;Neboj\u0161a Vu\u010dini\u0107;Peer Lorenzen", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1126JUD000580908" }, "319": { "webcast_id": "4361111_03122014", "hearing_date": "2014-12-03 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "F.G. v. Sweden (no. 43611\/11) ", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "43611\/11", "case_id": "001-161829", "case_name": "CASE OF F.G. v. SWEDEN", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-161829", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2016-03-23 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Chapter 12 section 22 of the Aliens Act ; Director General for Legal Affairs at the Swedish Migration Board\u2019s \u201cgeneral legal position\u201d concerning the methodology for assessing the reliability and credibility of applications for international protection (R\u00e4ttsligt st\u00e4llningstagande ang\u00e5ende metod f\u00f6r pr\u00f6vningen av tillf\u00f6rlitlighet och trov\u00e4rdighet, RCI 09\/2013)\n", "represented_by": "LOVEDAY D.", "respondent": "SWE", "articles": "2;3;35;37;37-1;37-1-c;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "A.A. v. Switzerland, no. 58802\/12, \u00a7 41, 7 January 2014;A.G. v. Sweden (dec.), no. 22107\/08, 6 December 2011;Abdulaziz, Cabales and Balkandali v. the United Kingdom, 28 May 1985, \u00a7 67, Series A no. 94;Ali Muradi and Selma Alieva v. Sweden (dec.), no 11243\/13, \u00a7\u00a7 44-45, 25 June 2013;Al-Jedda v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 27021\/08, \u00a7 117, ECHR 2011;Andreyev v. Estonia (dec.), no. 42987\/09, 22 January 2013;Atayeva and Burman v. Sweden (striking out), no. 17471\/11, \u00a7\u00a7 19-24, 31 October 2013;Atsaev v. the Czech Republic (dec.), no. 14021\/10, 7 July 2015;B.Z. v. Sweden (striking out), no. 74352\/11, \u00a7\u00a7 17 20, 18 December 2012;Bayatyan v. Armenia [GC], no. 23459\/03, \u00a7 110, ECHR 2011;Beldjoudi v. France, 26 March 1992, \u00a7\u00a7 79 and 86, Series A no. 234-A;Boujlifa v. France, 21 October 1997, \u00a7 42, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997 VI;Chahal v. the United Kingdom, 15 November 1996, Reports 1996-V;Collins and Akaziebie v. Sweden (dec.), no. 23944\/05, 8 March 2007;Etanji v. France (dec.), no. 60411\/00, 1 March 2005;Eweida and Others v. the United Kingdom, nos. 48420\/10, 59842\/10, 51671\/10 and 36516\/10, \u00a7 81, ECHR 2013;F.H. v. Sweden, no. 32621\/06, \u00a7 72, 20 January 2009;Giuliani and Gaggio v. Italy [GC], no. 23458\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 179-80, 24 March 2011;H. v. Norway (dec.), no. 51666\/13, 17 February 2015;H.L.R. v. France, 29 April 1997, \u00a741, Reports 1997 III;Hakizimana v. Sweden (dec.), no. 37913\/05, 27 March 2008;Hilal v. the United Kingdom, no. 45276\/99, \u00a7 60, ECHR 2001-II;Hirsi Jamaa and Others v. Italy [GC], no. 27765\/09, ECHR 2012;I.A. v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 76660\/12, 27 May 2014;Isman v. Switzerland (dec.), no. 23604\/11, 21 January 2014;K.A.B. v. Sweden, no. 886\/11, \u00a7 67, 5 September 2013;Kaboulov v. Ukraine, no. 41015\/04, \u00a7 99, 19 November 2009;L.M. and Others v. Russia, nos. 40081\/14, 40088\/14 and 40127\/14, \u00a7 108, 15 October 2015;M. and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 41416\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 105 and 143, 26 July 2011;M.A. v. Sweden (dec.), no. 28361\/12, 19 November 2013;M.E. v. Denmark, no. 58363\/10, \u00a7 51, 8 July 2014;M.E. v. Sweden, no. 71398\/12, \u00a7\u00a7 32-33, 26 June 2014;M.S.S. v. Belgium and Greece [GC], no. 30696\/09, ECHR 2011;Mamatkulov and Askarov v. Turkey [GC], nos. 46827\/99 and 46951\/99, \u00a7 67, ECHR 2005-I;Mamazhonov v. Russia, no. 17239\/13, \u00a7\u00a7 132 133, 23 October 2014;Maslov v. Austria [GC], no. 1638\/03, \u00a7\u00a7 87-95, ECHR 2008;Mocanu and Others v. Romania [GC], nos. 10865\/09, 45886\/07 and 32431\/08, \u00a7 314, ECHR 2014 (extracts);N. v Sweden, no. 23505\/09, 20 July 2010;N. v. Finland, no. 38885\/02, \u00a7 167, 26 July 2005;NA. v. the United Kingdom, no. 25904\/07, \u00a7 119, 17 July 2008;Nada v. Switzerland [GC], no. 10593\/08, \u00a7 245, ECHR 2012;Nizamov and Others v. Russia, nos. 22636\/13, 24034\/13, 24334\/13 and 24528\/13, \u00a7 50, 7 May 2014;Nizomkhon Dzhurayev v. Russia, no. 31890\/11, \u00a7 113, 3 October 2013;O.G.O. v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 13950\/12, 18 February 2014;Othman (Abu Qatada) v. the United Kingdom, no. 8139\/09, \u00a7 261, ECHR 2012 (extracts);Ouabour v. Belgium, no. 26417\/10, \u00a7 65, 2 June 2015;P.Z. and Others v. Sweden (striking out), no. 68194\/10, \u00a7\u00a7 14-17, 18 December 2012;Pellumbi v. France (dec.), no. 65730\/01, 18 January 2005;R.C. v. Sweden, no. 41827\/07, \u00a7 52, 9 March 2010;S.A.S. v. France [GC], no. 43835\/11, \u00a7 55, 1 July 2014;S.F. and Others v. Sweden, no. 52077\/10, 15 May 2012;Saadi v. Italy [GC], no. 37201\/06, ECHR 2008;Salah Sheekh v. the Netherlands, no. 1948\/04, \u00a7 136, 11 January 2007;Sarwari v. Austria (dec.), no. 21662\/10, 3 November 2011;Savriddin Dzhurayev v. Russia, no. 71386\/10, \u00a7 155, ECHR 2013 (extracts);S\u00f6derman v. Sweden [GC], no. 5786\/08, \u00a7 125, ECHR 2013;Sufi and Elmi v. the United Kingdom, nos. 8319\/07 and 11449\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 214-218, 28 June 2011;T.A. v. Sweden, no. 48866\/10, \u00a7 37, 19 December 2013;Tarakhel v. Switzerland [GC], no. 29217\/12, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Tukhtamurodov v. Russia (dec.), no. 21762\/14, 20 January 2015;\u00dcner v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 46410\/99, \u00a7 54, ECHR 2006-XII;Vijayanathan and Pusparajah v. France, 27 August 1992, \u00a7 46, Series A no. 241 B;Vilvarajah and Others v. the United Kingdom, 30 October 1991, \u00a7\u00a7 107-108, Series A no. 215;X and Others v. Austria [GC], no. 19010\/07, \u00a7 163, ECHR 2013", "external_sources": "UNCHR handbook on Procedures and Criteria for Determining Refugee Status under the 1951 Convention on the 1967 Protocol relating to the Status of Refugees;UNHCR Guidelines on International Protection regarding Religion-Based Refugee Claims;Judgment of the CJEU in Bundesrepublik Deutschland v. Y (C-71\/11) and Z (C-99\/11)\n", "conclusion": "Remainder inadmissible;No violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2 - Expulsion) (Conditional) (Iran);No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Expulsion) (Conditional) (Iran);Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2 - Expulsion) (Conditional) (Iran);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Expulsion) (Conditional) (Iran);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Ale\u0161 Pejchal;Andr\u00e1s Saj\u00f3;Andr\u00e9 Potocki;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Ann Power-Forde;Dean Spielmann;Dmitry Dedov;Elisabeth Steiner;George Nicolaou;Guido Raimondi;Helena J\u00e4derblom;Ineta Ziemele;Josep Casadevall;Julia Laffranque;Krzysztof Wojtyczek;Ledi Bianku;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Mark Villiger;Paul Lemmens;Paulo Pinto De Albuquerque;Robert Spano;Vincent A. De Gaetano", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0323JUD004361111" }, "320": { "webcast_id": "4361111_03122014", "hearing_date": "2014-12-03 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "F.G. v. Sweden (no. 43611\/11) ", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "43611\/11", "case_id": "001-140020", "case_name": "CASE OF F.G. v. SWEDEN", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-140020", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2014-01-16 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "23", "issue": "", "represented_by": "DONNER G.", "respondent": "SWE", "articles": "2;3", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "No violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2 - Expulsion) (Conditional) (Iran);No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Expulsion) (Conditional) (Iran)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Andr\u00e9 Potocki;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Ann Power-Forde;Helena J\u00e4derblom;Mark Villiger;Paul Lemmens", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0116JUD004361111" }, "321": { "webcast_id": "2656207_14102014", "hearing_date": "2014-10-14 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Tagayeva and Others v. Russia (no. 26562\/07)", "hearing_type": "Chamber hearing", "appno": "26562\/07", "case_id": "001-172660", "case_name": "CASE OF TAGAYEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-172660", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2017-04-13 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "4", "issue": "Suppression of Terrorism Act of the Russian Federation of 1998 (Law no. 130-FZ \u2013 hereinafter \u201cthe Suppression of Terrorism Act\u201d), in force until 1 January 2007 ; 1989 Army Field Manual (\u0411\u043e\u0435\u0432\u043e\u0439 \u0443\u0441\u0442\u0430\u0432 \u0421\u0443\u0445\u043e\u043f\u0443\u0442\u043d\u044b\u0445 \u0432\u043e\u0439\u0441\u043a), enacted by the Commander-in-Chief of the Soviet Union on 9 April 1989 and published by the Ministry of Defence of the USSR in 1990", "represented_by": "KOROTEYEV K. ; GAVRON J. ; KNYAZKIN S. ; TREPASHKIN M.", "respondent": "RUS", "articles": "2;2-1;2-2;13;13+2;35;35-3-a;41;46;46-2", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Abakarova v. Russia, no. 16664\/07, 15 October 2015;Abramiuc v. Romania, no. 37411\/02, \u00a7 119, 24 February 2009;Abuyeva and Others v. Russia, no. 27065\/05, 2 December 2010;Ahmet \u00d6zkan and Others v. Turkey, no. 21689\/93, \u00a7\u00a7 311 14, 6 April 2004;Al-Skeini and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 55721\/07, \u00a7 166, ECHR 2011;Armani Da Silva v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 5878\/08, ECHR 2016;Arzu Akhmadova and Others v. Russia, no. 13670\/03, \u00a7 164, 8 January 2009;Aslakhanova and Others v. Russia, nos. 2944\/06, 8300\/07, 50184\/07, 332\/08 and 42509\/10, 18 December 2012;Assanidze v. Georgia [GC], no. 71503\/01, \u00a7 198, ECHR 2004 II;Benzer and Others v. Turkey, no. 23502\/06, \u00a7 217, 12 November 2013;Boyle and Rice v. the United Kingdom, 27 April 1988, \u00a7 52, Series A no. 131;Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin C\u00e2mpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848\/08ECHR 2014;Choreftakis and Choreftaki v. Greece, no. 46846\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 48-49, 17 January 2012;Dimov and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 30086\/05, 6 November 2012;Dzhamayeva and Others v. Russia, no. 43170\/04, \u00a7 89, 8 January 2009;El-Masri v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia [GC], no. 39630\/09, \u00a7 255, ECHR 2012;Ergi v. Turkey, 23818\/94, 28 July 1998, Reports of Judgements and decisions1998-IV;Esmukhambetov and Others v. Russia, no. 23445\/03, \u00a7 143, 29 March 2011;Finogenov and Others v. Russia, nos. 18299\/03 and 27311\/03, ECHR 2011 (extracts);Giuliani and Gaggio v. Italy [GC], no. 23458\/02, ECHR 2011 (extracts);Hugh Jordan v. the United Kingdom, no. 24746\/94, \u00a7 107, 4 May 2001;Isayeva v. Russia, no. 57950\/00, 24 February 2005;Janowiec and Others v. Russia (dec.), nos. 55508\/07 and 29520\/09, 5 July 2011;Kaya v. Turkey, 19 February 1998, Reports 1998-I;Khashiyev and Akayeva v. Russia, nos. 57942\/00 and 57945\/00, 24 February 2005;Maiorano and Others v. Italy, no. 28634\/06, \u00a7 107, 15 December 2009;Makaratzis v. Greece [GC], no. 50385\/99, ECHR 2004 XI;Mansuro\u011flu v. Turkey, no. 43443\/98, \u00a7 80, 26 February 2008;Mastromatteo v. Italy [GC], no. 37703\/97, \u00a7 69, ECHR 2002 VIII;McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, 27 September 1995, Series A no. 324 \u00a7 161;McCaughey and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 43098\/09, \u00a7 145, ECHR 2013;Medova v. Russia, no. 25385\/04, \u00a7 96, 15 January 2009;Nihayet Ar\u0131c\u0131 and Others v. Turkey, nos. 24604\/04 and 16855\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 173-76, 23 October 2012;\u00d6nery\u0131ld\u0131z v. Turkey, [GC], no. 48939\/99, ECHR 2004 XII;Osman v. the United Kingdom, 28 October 1998, Reports 1998-VIII;P.F. and E.F. v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 28326\/09, \u00a7 41, 23 November 2010;Paul and Audrey Edwards v. the United Kingdom, no. 46477\/99, \u00a7 55, ECHR 2002 II;Perez v. France ([GC], no. 47287\/99, \u00a7\u00a7 70-71, ECHR 2004 I;Rywin v. Poland, nos. 6091\/06, 4047\/07 and 4070\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 213-17, 18 February 2016;Sahin v. Germany [GC], no. 30943\/96, \u00a7 105, ECHR 2003 VIII;Scozzari and Giunta v. Italy [GC], nos. 39221\/98 and 41963\/98, \u00a7 249, ECHR 2000 VIII;Steel and Morris v. the United Kingdom, no. 68416\/01, \u00a7 112, ECHR 2005 II;Tagayeva and Others v. Russia (dec.), no. 26562\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 470-84, 9 June 2015;Tsechoyev v. Russia, no. 39358\/05, \u00a7 136, 15 March 2011;Varnava and Others v. Turkey [GC], nos. 16064\/90 and 8 others, ECHR 2009;Zuban and Hamidovic v. Bosnia and Herzegovina (dec.), nos. 7175\/06 and 8710\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 30-35, 2 September 2014", "external_sources": "UN Basic Principles on the Use of Force and Firearms by Law Enforcement Officials, adopted by the Eighth United Nations Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders (Havana, Cuba, 27 August to 7 September 1990);Council of Europe Guidelines on human rights and the fight against terrorism, adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 11 July 2002", "conclusion": "Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione personae;Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2 - Positive obligations;Article 2-1 - Life) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Life) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Life) (Substantive aspect);No violation of Article 13+2 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 2 - Right to life;Article 2-1 - Life);Respondent State to take individual measures (Article 46-2 - Individual measures);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Just satisfaction);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Respondent State to take measures of a general character (Article 46-2 - General measures)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Dmitry Dedov;Erik M\u00f8se;Julia Laffranque;Khanlar Hajiyev;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska;Paulo Pinto De Albuquerque", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0413JUD002656207" }, "322": { "webcast_id": "2656207_14102014", "hearing_date": "2014-10-14 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Tagayeva and Others v. Russia (no. 26562\/07)", "hearing_type": "Chamber hearing", "appno": "26562\/07", "case_id": "001-111101", "case_name": "TAGAYEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-111101", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "2012-04-10 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "KESAYEVA E. ; MOSKALENKO, K ; MOSKALENKO, K ; MOSKALENKO K.", "respondent": "RUS", "articles": "2;2-1;13", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "", "separate_opinion": "FALSE", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "323": { "webcast_id": "2656207_14102014", "hearing_date": "2014-10-14 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Tagayeva and Others v. Russia (no. 26562\/07)", "hearing_type": "Chamber hearing", "appno": "26562\/07", "case_id": "001-155843", "case_name": "TAGAYEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-155843", "type": "DECISIONS", "typedescription": 8, "document_date": "", "collection": "CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "4", "issue": "", "represented_by": "KOROTEYEV K.N. ; TREPASHKIN M.I. ; KNYAZKIN S.A.", "respondent": "RUS", "articles": "2;3;6;8;10;13;13+2;35;37;37-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Partly admissible;Partly inadmissible;Partly struck out of the list", "separate_opinion": "", "judges": "Dmitry Dedov;Elisabeth Steiner;Erik M\u00f8se;Julia Laffranque;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0609DEC002656207" }, "324": { "webcast_id": "2338009_08102014", "hearing_date": "2014-10-08 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Bouyid v. Belgium (no. 23380\/09)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "23380\/09", "case_id": "001-157670", "case_name": "CASE OF BOUYID v. BELGIUM", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-157670", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2015-09-28 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "", "represented_by": "MARCHAND C ; CHIHAOUI Z.", "respondent": "BEL", "articles": "3;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "A.S. v. France [GC] no 43835\/11, \u00a7\u00a7 122 and 141 ECHR 2014 (extracts);Aksoy v. Turkey, 18 December 1996, \u00a7 64, Reports 1996 VI;Asiatiques d\u2019Afrique orientale v. the United Kingdom, nos. 4403\/70, 4404\/70, 4405\/70, 4406\/70, 4407\/70, 4408\/70, 4409\/70, 4410\/70, 4411\/70, 4412\/70, 4413\/70, 4414\/70, 4415\/70, 4416\/70, 4417\/70, 4418\/70, 4419\/70, 4422\/70, 4423\/70, 4434\/70, 4443\/70, 4476\/70, 4477\/70, 4478\/70, 4486\/70, 4501\/70, 4526\/70, 4527\/70, 4528\/70, 4529\/70 and 4530\/70, report of 14 December 1973, Decisions and Reports 78-B, \u00a7 192;C.R. v. the United Kingdom, 22 November 1995, \u00a7 42, Series A no 335 C;Chahal v. the United Kingdom, 15 November 1996, \u00a7 79, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 V;Cobzaru v. Romania, no 48254\/99, \u00a7 65, 26 July 2007;Darraj v. France, no 34588\/07, \u00a7 44, 4 November 2010;Davydov and Others v. Ukraine, nos. 17674\/02 and 39081\/02, 1 July 2010;Denisenko and Bogdanchikov v. Russia, no 3811\/02, \u00a7 83, 12 February 2009;Egmez v. Cyprus, no 30873\/96, \u00a7 78, ECHR 2000 XII;El-Masri v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia [GC], no 39630\/09, ECHR 2012;G\u00e4fgen v. Germany [GC], no 22978\/05, ECHR 2010;Georgia v. Russia (I) [GC], no 13255\/07, \u00a7 192, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Georgiy Bykov v. Russia, no 24271\/03, \u00a7 51, 14 October 2010;Ireland v. the United Kingdom, 18 January 1978, Series A no 25;Iurcu v. the Republic of Moldova, no 33759\/10, 9 April 2013;Jalloh v. Germany [GC], no 54810\/00, \u00a7 67, ECHR 2006 IX;Jeunesse v. the Netherlands [GC], no 12738\/10, \u00a7 135, 3 October 2014;Krastanov v. Bulgaria, no 50222\/99, \u00a7 53, 30 September 2004;Kud\u0142a v. Poland [GC], no 30210\/96, \u00a7 94, ECHR 2000 XI;Labita v. Italy [GC], no 26772\/95, ECHR 2000 IV;M.S.S. v. Belgium and Greece [GC], no 30696\/09, \u00a7 220, ECHR 2011;McKerr v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no 28883\/95, 4 April 2000;McKerr v. the United Kingdom, no 28883\/95, \u00a7 114, ECHR 2001 III;Mete and Others v. Turkey, no 294\/08, 4 October 2012;Mocanu and Others v. Romania [GC], nos. 10865\/09, 45886\/07 and 32431\/08, ECHR (extracts);Okkal\u0131 v. Turkey, no 52067\/99, ECHR 2006 XII (extracts);Petyo Petkov v. Bulgaria, no 32130\/03, \u00a7\u00a7 42 and 47, 7 January 2010;Pretty v. the United Kingdom, no 2346\/02, \u00a7 65, ECHR 2002 III;Ramirez Sanchez v. France [GC], no 59450\/00, \u00a7 117, ECHR 2006 IX;Ribitsch v. Austria, 4 December 1995, Series A no 336;Rivas v. France, no 59584\/00, 1 April 2004;S.W. v. the United Kingdom, 22 November 1995, \u00a7 44, Series A no 335 B;Salman v. Turkey [GC], no 21986\/93, ECHR 2000 VII;Sam\u00fct Karabulut v. Turkey, no 16999\/04, \u00a7\u00a7 41 and 58, 27 January 2009;Selmouni v. France [GC], no 25803\/94, ECHR 1999 V;Svinarenko and Slyadnev v. Russia [GC], nos. 32541\/08 and 43441\/08, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Turan \u00c7ak\u0131r v. Belgium, no 44256\/06, \u00a7 54, 10 March 2009;Tyrer v. the United Kingdom, 25 April 1978, \u00a7 32, Series A no 26;V. v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 24888\/94, \u00a7 71, ECHR 1999 IX;Vala\u0161inas v. Lithuania, no 44558\/98, \u00a7 102, ECHR 2001 VIII;Vasyukov Russia, no 2974\/05, \u00a7 59, 5 April 2011;Yankov v. Bulgaria, no 39084\/97, \u00a7 114, ECHR 2003 XII (extracts);Yazg\u00fcl Y\u0131lmaz v. Turkey, no 36369\/06, 1er February 2011", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Ale\u0161 Pejchal;Alvina Gyulumyan;Andr\u00e9 Potocki;Ann Power-Forde;Dean Spielmann;Egidijus K\u016bris;Erik M\u00f8se;Ganna Yudkivska;Guido Raimondi;Helen Keller;Helena J\u00e4derblom;Iulia Motoc;Krzysztof Wojtyczek;Ledi Bianku;Mark Villiger;Neboj\u0161a Vu\u010dini\u0107;Nona Tsotsoria;Paul Lemmens;Paul Mahoney;Paulo Pinto De Albuquerque;Vincent A. De Gaetano", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0928JUD002338009" }, "325": { "webcast_id": "2338009_08102014", "hearing_date": "2014-10-08 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Bouyid v. Belgium (no. 23380\/09)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "23380\/09", "case_id": "001-138779", "case_name": "CASE OF BOUYID v. BELGIUM", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-138779", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 14, "document_date": "2013-11-21 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 2, "court": "23", "issue": "", "represented_by": "CHIHAOUI Z. ; MARCHAND C. ", "respondent": "BEL", "articles": "3;35", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Campbell and Cosans v. the United Kingdom, 25 February 1982, \u00a7 30, Series A no 48;Costello-Roberts v. the United Kingdom, 25 March 1993, \u00a7 32, Series A no 247 C;Crean\u011fa v. Romania [GC], no 29226\/03, \u00a7 88, 23 February 2012;El Masri v. \u201cthe former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia\u201d [GC], no. 39630\/09, ECHR 2012;Ireland v. the United Kingdom, 18 January 1978, Series A no 25;Jalloh v. Germany [GC], no 54810\/00, \u00a7 67, ECHR 2006-IX;Kud\u0142a v. Poland [GC], no 30210\/96, \u00a7 92, ECHR 2000-XI;Labita v. Italy [GC], no 26772\/95, \u00a7 121, ECHR 2000 IV;M.S.S. v. Belgium [GC], no 30696\/09, \u00a7 220, ECHR 2011;Mete and Others v. Turkey, no 294\/08, 4 October 2012;Perez v. France [GC], no 47287\/99, \u00a7 70, ECHR 2004 I;Pretty v. the United Kingdom, no 2346\/02, \u00a7 52, ECHR 2002-III;Ribitsch v. Austria, 4 December 1995, \u00a7 38, Series A no 336;Rivas v. France, no 59584\/00, 1 April 2004;Salman v. Turkey [GC], no 21986\/93, ECHR 2000 VII", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Remainder inadmissible;No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Ale\u0161 Pejchal;Andr\u00e9 Potocki;Ann Power-Forde;Ganna Yudkivska;Helena J\u00e4derblom;Mark Villiger;Paul Lemmens", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1121JUD002338009" }, "326": { "webcast_id": "4714306_24092014", "hearing_date": "2014-09-24 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Roman Zakharov v. Russia (no. 47143\/06)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "47143\/06", "case_id": "001-159324", "case_name": "CASE OF ROMAN ZAKHAROV v. RUSSIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-159324", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2015-12-04 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Operational-Search Activities Act of 12 August 1995 ; Orders Nos 70 and 538 of the Ministry of Communications ; Code of Criminal Procedure of 18 December 2001 ; Judicial Review Act ; Chapter 25 of the Code of Civil Procedure ; Article 1069 of the Civil Code\n", "represented_by": "GRUZD B. ; NGO EHRAC \/ Memorial Human Rights Centre", "respondent": "RUS", "articles": "8;8-1;8-2;34;35;35-1;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Amann v. Switzerland [GC], no. 27798\/95, \u00a7\u00a7 56-58, ECHR 2000 II;Ananyev and Others v. Russia, nos. 42525\/07 and 60800\/08, \u00a7 215, 10 January 2012;Association for European Integration and Human Rights and Ekimdzhiev v. Bulgaria, no. 62540\/00, 28 June 2007;Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin C\u00e2mpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848\/08, ECHR 2014;Chahal v. the United Kingdom, 15 November 1996, \u00a7 131, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 V;Christie v. the United Kingdom, no. 21482\/93, Commission decision of 27 June 1994;;Dumitru Popescu v. Romania (no. 2), no. 71525\/01, \u00a7 71, 26 April 2007;Esbester v. the United Kingdom, no. 18601\/91, Commission decision of 2 April 1993;Halford v. the United Kingdom, 25 June 1997, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997 III;Huvig v. France, 24 April 1990, Series A no. 176 B;Iliya Stefanov v. Bulgaria, no. 65755\/01, \u00a7\u00a7 49 and 50, 22 May 2008;Iordachi and Others v. Moldova, no. 25198\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 30-35, 10 February 2009;Kennedy v. the United Kingdom, no. 26839\/05, 18 May 2010;Khan v. the United Kingdom, no. 35394\/97, \u00a7\u00a7 45-47, ECHR 2000 V;Klass and Others v. Germany, 6 September 1978, \u00a7 34, Series A no. 28;Krone Verlag GmbH & Co. KG v. Austria (no. 4), no. 72331\/01, \u00a7 26, 9 November 2006;L. v. Norway, no. 13564\/88, Commission decision of 8 June 1990;Leander v. Sweden, 26 March 1987, \u00a7 51, Series A no. 116;Liberty and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 58243\/00, \u00a7\u00a7 56 and 57, 1 July 2008;Liu v. Russia, no. 42086\/05, \u00a7 56, 6 December 2007;Malone v. the United Kingdom, 2 August 1984, Series A no. 82;Matthews v. the United Kingdom, no. 28576\/95, Commission decision of 16 October 1996;Menchinskaya v. Russia, no. 42454\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 19 and 38, 15 January 2009;N.C. v. Italy [GC], no. 24952\/94, \u00a7 56, ECHR 2002 X;Prado Bugallo v. Spain, no. 58496\/00, \u00a7 30, 18 February 2003;Redgrave v. the United Kingdom, no. 20271\/92, Commission decision of 1 September 1993;Rotaru v. Romania [GC], no. 28341\/95, ECHR 2000 V;S. and Marper v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 30562\/04 and 30566\/04, \u00a7 95, ECHR 2008;Valenzuela Contreras v. Spain, 30 July 1998, \u00a7 46, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 V;Weber and Saravia v. Germany (dec.), no. 54934\/00, ECHR 2006-XI", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Article 34 - Actio popularis;Victim);Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Article 35-1 - Exhaustion of domestic remedies);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for correspondence;Respect for private life);Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Andr\u00e9 Potocki;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Dean Spielmann;Dmitry Dedov;Erik M\u00f8se;Guido Raimondi;Helena J\u00e4derblom;Ineta Ziemele;Josep Casadevall;Julia Laffranque;Khanlar Hajiyev;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Luis L\u00f3pez Guerra;Mark Villiger;Paul Lemmens;Ksenija Turkovi\u0107", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1204JUD004714306" }, "327": { "webcast_id": "4714306_24092014", "hearing_date": "2014-09-24 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Roman Zakharov v. Russia (no. 47143\/06)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "47143\/06", "case_id": "001-142532", "case_name": "ZAKHAROV v. RUSSIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-142532", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "GRUZD B.", "respondent": "RUS", "articles": "8;8-1;13", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "", "separate_opinion": "", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "328": { "webcast_id": "4141804_03092014", "hearing_date": "2014-09-03 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Khoroshenko v. Russia (no. 41418\/04)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "41418\/04", "case_id": "001-156006", "case_name": "CASE OF KHOROSHENKO v. RUSSIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-156006", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2015-06-30 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Articles 79, 125 \u00a7 3, 126 and 127 \u00a7 3 of the Code of Execution of Criminal Sentences ; Article 55 \u00a7 3 of the Constitution\n", "represented_by": "PREOBRAZHENSKAYA O.V. ; MAKAROVA M.", "respondent": "RUS", "articles": "5;5-1;5-1-a;8;8-1;8-2;35;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Aleksandr Matveyev v. Russia, no 14797\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 67-68, 8 July 2010;Aleksandra Dmitriyeva v. Russia, no 9390\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 104-107, 3 November 2011;Aliev v. Ukraine, no 41220\/98, \u00a7 187, 29 April 2003;Bastone v. Italy (dec.), no 59638\/00, \u00a7 2, ECHR 2005 II (extracts);Benediktov v. Russia, no 106\/02, \u00a7 12, 10 May 2007;Boulois v. Luxembourg [GC], no 37575\/04, \u00a7 82, ECHR 2012;Boyle and Rice v. the United Kingdom, 27 April 1988, \u00a7 34, Series A no 131;Dickson v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 44362\/04, ECHR 2007 V;Enea v. Italy [GC], no 74912\/01, \u00a7\u00a7 125-131, ECHR 2009;Epners Gefners v. Latvia, no 37862\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 60-66, 29 May 2012;Estrikh v. Latvia, no 73819\/01, \u00a7 166, 18 January 2007;Gouliyev v. Russia, no 24650\/02, \u00a7 31, 19 June 2008;Hagy\u00f3 v. Hungary, no 52624\/10, \u00a7 84, 23 April 2013;Harakchiev and Tolumov v. Bulgaria, nos. 15018\/11 and 61199\/12, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Hirst v. the United Kingdom (no 2) [GC], no 74025\/01, \u00a7 69, ECHR 2005 IX;Horych v. Poland, no 13621\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 117-132, 17 April 2012;Igor Ivanov v. Russia, no 34000\/02, \u00a7 30, 7 June 2007;Indelicato v. Italy (dec.), no 31143\/96, \u00a7 2, 6 July 2000;Iorgov v. Bulgaria, no 40653\/98, \u00a7\u00a7 83-84, 11 March 2004;Kalashnikov v. Russia (dec.), no 47095\/99, \u00a7 7, ECHR 2001 XI (extracts);Klamecki v. Poland (no 2), no 31583\/96, \u00a7 144, 3 April 2003;Ku\u010dera v. Slovakia, no 48666\/99, \u00a7 127, 17 July 2007;Laduna v. Slovakia, no 31827\/02, \u00a7 59, ECHR 2011;Lavents v. Latvia, no 58442\/00, \u00a7 139, 28 November 2002;Lors\u00e9 and Others v. the Netherlands, no 52750\/99, \u00a7\u00a7 83-86, 4 February 2003;Maiorano and Others v. Italy, no 28634\/06, \u00a7 108, 15 December 2009;Maltabar and Maltabar v. Russia, no 6954\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 82-84, 29 January 2009;Mastromatteo v. Italy [GC], no 37703\/97, \u00a7 72, ECHR 2002 VIII;Messina v. Italy (no 2), no 25498\/94, \u00a7\u00a7 61-74, ECHR 2000 X;Moiseyev v. Russia, no 62936\/00, \u00a7\u00a7 254-255, 9 October 2008;Nazarenko v. Latvia, no 76843\/01, \u00a7 25, 1 February 2007;Nowicka v. Poland, no 30218\/96, \u00a7\u00a7 69-70, 3 December 2002;\u00d6calan v. Turkey (no 2), nos. 24069\/03, 197\/04, 6201\/06 and 10464\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 108-149 and \u00a7\u00a7 154-164, 18 March 2014;Ospina Vargas v. Italy, no 40750\/98, \u00a7 3, 14 October 2004;Piechowicz v. Poland, no 20071\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 205-222, 17 April 2012;P\u0142oski v. Poland, no 26761\/95, \u00a7\u00a7 32 and 35, 12 November 2002;Rotaru v. Romania [GC], no 28341\/95, \u00a7 52, ECHR 2000 V;Schemkamper v. France, no 75833\/01, \u00a7 31, 18 October 2005;Trosin v. Ukraine, no 39758\/05, 23 February 2012;Valeriy Lopata v. Russia, no 19936\/04, \u00a7\u00a7 104-106, 30 October 2012;Van der Ven v. the Netherlands, no 50901\/99, \u00a7\u00a7 69-72, ECHR 2003 II;Vinter and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 66069\/09, 130\/10 and 3896\/10, \u00a7\u00a7 111-116, ECHR 2013 (extracts)", "external_sources": "Articles 6, 24.1, 24.2, 24.4, 24.5, 102.1 and 102.2 of the European Prison Rules;Recommendation Rec(2006)2 of the Committee of Ministers to member States on the European Prison Rules;Resolution 76(2) of the Committee of Ministers of 17 February 1976 \u201cOn the treatment of long-term prisoners\u201d;Recommendation Rec(2003)23 of the Committee of Ministers on the management by prison administrations of life sentence and other long-term prisoners;Memorandum of the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment of 27 June 2007 (CPT (2007) 55) \u201cActual\/real life sentences\u201d;CPT 2nd General Report \u2013 CPT\/Inf (92) 3;CPT 11th General Report \u2013 CPT\/Inf (2001) 16;Rules 37 and 57 of the UN Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners;Principle 19 of the Body of Principles for the Protection of All Persons under Any Form of Detention or Imprisonment;Rule 61 (A) International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia\u2019s Rules Governing the Detention of Persons Awaiting Trial or Appeal before the Tribunal or Otherwise Detained on the Authority of the Tribunal;Article 10 \u00a7 3 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights\n", "conclusion": "Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for family life;Respect for private life);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Dean Spielmann;Dmitry Dedov;Egidijus K\u016bris;Elisabeth Steiner;Erik M\u00f8se;Guido Raimondi;Ineta Ziemele;Josep Casadevall;Julia Laffranque;Khanlar Hajiyev;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Mark Villiger;Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska;Paul Mahoney;Paulo Pinto De Albuquerque;Ksenija Turkovi\u0107", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0630JUD004141804" }, "329": { "webcast_id": "4141804_03092014", "hearing_date": "2014-09-03 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Khoroshenko v. Russia (no. 41418\/04)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "41418\/04", "case_id": "001-141827", "case_name": "KHOROSHENKO v. RUSSIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-141827", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "", "respondent": "RUS", "articles": "8;8-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Communicated", "separate_opinion": "", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "330": { "webcast_id": "6456909_09072014", "hearing_date": "2014-07-09 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Delfi AS v. Estonia (no. 64569\/09)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "64569\/09", "case_id": "001-155105", "case_name": "CASE OF DELFI AS v. ESTONIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-155105", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2015-06-16 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Articles 17, 19 and 45 of the Constitution ; Subsection 2 of section 134, section 1047, 1045-1074, 1050 and 1055 of the Obligations Act ; Section 138 of the Civil Code (General Principles) Act ; Information Society Services Act ; Article 244 of the Code of Civil Procedure", "represented_by": "OTSMANN V. ; TURK K.", "respondent": "EST", "articles": "8;8-1;10;10-1;10-2;17", "strasbourg_caselaw": "A. v. Norway, no. 28070\/06, \u00a7 64, 9 April 2009;Ahmet Y\u0131ld\u0131r\u0131m v. Turkey, no. 3111\/10, \u00a7 48, ECHR 2012;Animal Defenders International v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 48876\/08, \u00a7 100, ECHR 2013;Ashby Donald and Others v. France, no. 36769\/08, \u00a7 40, 10 January 2013;Axel Springer AG v. Germany [GC], no. 39954\/08, 7 February 2012;Bladet Troms\u00f8 and Stensaas v. Norway [GC], no. 21980\/93, ECHR 1999 III;Cantoni v. France, 15 November 1996, \u00a7 35, Reports 1996 V;Castells v. Spain, 23 April 1992, \u00a7 46, Series A no. 236;Centro Europa 7 S.r.l. and Di Stefano v. Italy [GC], no. 38433\/09, ECHR 2012;Chassagnou and Others v. France [GC], nos. 25088\/94, 28331\/95 and 28443\/95, \u00a7 113, ECHR 1999 III;Chauvy and Others v. France, no. 64915\/01, ECHR 2004 VI;De Haes and Gijsels v. Belgium, 24 February 1997, \u00a7 37, Reports 1997 I;Editorial Board of Pravoye Delo and Shtekel v. Ukraine, no. 33014\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 63-64, ECHR 2011;Evans v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 6339\/05, \u00a7 77, ECHR 2007 I;Garaudy v. France (dec.), no. 65831\/01, ECHR 2003 IX;Gaw\u0119da v. Poland, no. 26229\/95, \u00a7 39, ECHR 2002-II;Gorzelik and Others v. Poland [GC], no. 44158\/98, \u00a7 67, ECHR 2004 I;Hachette Filipacchi Associ\u00e9s v. France, no. 71111\/01, 14 June 2007;Hertel v. Switzerland, 25 August 1998, \u00a7 46, Reports 1998 VI;Incal v. Turkey, 9 June 1998, \u00a7 54, Reports 1998 IV;Jersild v. Denmark, 23 September 1994, Series A no. 298;K.U. v. Finland, no. 2872\/02, \u00a7 49, ECHR 2008;Kopp v. Switzerland, 25 March 1998, \u00a7 59, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-II;Krone Verlags GmbH & Co. KG v. Austria (no. 4), no. 72331\/01, \u00a7 32, 9 November 2006;Kruslin v. France, 24 April 1990, \u00a7 29, Series A no. 176-A;Lehideux and Isorni v. France, 23 September 1998, \u00a7\u00a7 47 and 53, Reports 1998 VII;Lindon, Otchakovsky-Laurens and July v. France [GC], nos. 21279\/02 and 36448\/02, \u00a7 41, ECHR 2007 IV;Maestri v. Italy [GC], no. 39748\/98, \u00a7 30, ECHR 2004-I;MGN Limited v. the United Kingdom, no. 39401\/04, 18 January 2011;Mosley v. the United Kingdom, no. 48009\/08, 10 May 2011;Mouvement ra\u00eblien suisse v. Switzerland [GC], no. 16354\/06, \u00a7 48, ECHR 2012;Norwood v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 23131\/03, ECHR 2004 XI;Palomo S\u00e1nchez and Others v. Spain [GC], nos. 28955\/06, 28957\/06, 28959\/06 and 28964\/06, \u00a7 57, 12 September 2011;Pavel Ivanov v. Russia (dec.), no. 35222\/04, 20 February 2007;Pfeifer v. Austria, no. 12556\/03, \u00a7 35, 15 November 2007;Polanco Torres and Movilla Polanco v. Spain, no. 34147\/06, \u00a7 40, 21 September 2010;Prager and Oberschlick v. Austria, 26 April 1995, \u00a7 38, Series A no. 313;Print Zeitungsverlag GmbH v. Austria, no. 26547\/07, \u00a7 39, 10 October 2013;Purcell and Others v. Ireland, no. 15404\/89, Commission decision of 16 April 1991, Decisions and Reports 70, p. 262;Rekv\u00e9nyi v. Hungary [GC], no. 25390\/94, \u00a7 35, ECHR 1999 III;Rotaru v. Romania [GC], no. 28341\/95, \u00a7 52, ECHR 2000-V;Steel and Morris v. the United Kingdom, no. 68416\/01, \u00a7 87, ECHR 2005 II;Tammer v. Estonia, no. 41205\/98, \u00a7 62, ECHR 2001 I;Thoma v. Luxembourg, no. 38432\/97, \u00a7 62, ECHR 2001 III;Timciuc v. Romania (dec.), no. 28999\/03, \u00a7 144, 12 October 2010;Times Newspapers Ltd v. the United Kingdom (nos. 1 and 2), nos. 3002\/03 and 23676\/03, \u00a7 27, ECHR 2009;Verlagsgruppe News GmbH v. Austria, no. 76918\/01, \u00a7 31, 14 December 2006;VgT Verein gegen Tierfabriken v. Switzerland, no. 24699\/94, \u00a7 52, ECHR 2001 VI;Von Hannover v. Germany (no. 2) [GC], nos. 40660\/08 and 60641\/08, ECHR 2012;Witzsch v. Germany (dec.), no. 7485\/03, 13 December 2005", "external_sources": "Recommendation CM\/Rec(2011)7 of the Committee of Ministers to member States on a new notion of media;Directive 2000\/31\/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2000 on certain legal aspects of information society services, in particular electronic commerce, in the Internal Market;CJEU, Case C-131\/12 Google Spain and Google", "conclusion": "No violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression -{General} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression;Freedom to impart information)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Andr\u00e1s Saj\u00f3;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Dean Spielmann;Dmitry Dedov;Elisabeth Steiner;Guido Raimondi;Helena J\u00e4derblom;Ineta Ziemele;Isabelle Berro-Lef\u00e8vre;Jon Fridrik Kj\u00f8lbro;Josep Casadevall;Julia Laffranque;Khanlar Hajiyev;Ledi Bianku;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Mark Villiger;Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska;Nona Tsotsoria;Robert Spano;Vincent A. De Gaetano;Ksenija Turkovi\u0107", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0616JUD006456909" }, "331": { "webcast_id": "6456909_09072014", "hearing_date": "2014-07-09 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Delfi AS v. Estonia (no. 64569\/09)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "64569\/09", "case_id": "001-126635", "case_name": "CASE OF DELFI AS v. ESTONIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-126635", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2013-10-10 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 3, "court": "4", "issue": "Information Society Services Act ; Articles 17, 19 and 45 of the Constitution of the Republic of Estonia ; Section 138 of the Civil Code (General Principles) Act ; Sections 134, 1043, 1045, 1046, 1047 and 1055 of the Obligations Act", "represented_by": "OTSMANN V.", "respondent": "EST", "articles": "8;8-1;10;10-1;10-2;35;35-3", "strasbourg_caselaw": "A. v. Norway, no. 28070\/06, \u00a7 64, 9 April 2009;Animal Defenders International v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 48876\/08, \u00a7 100, 22 April 2013;Axel Springer AG v. Germany [GC], no. 39954\/08, 7 February 2012;Bernh Larsen Holding AS and Others v. Norway, no. 24117\/08, \u00a7 126, 14 March 2013;Bladet Troms\u00f8 and Stensaas v. Norway [GC], no. 21980\/93, \u00a7\u00a7 58-59, ECHR 1999-III;Cantoni v. France, 15 November 1996, \u00a7 35, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-V;Castells v. Spain, 23 April 1992, \u00a7 46, Series A no. 236;Chauvy and Others v. France, no. 64915\/01, \u00a7\u00a7 43-45, ECHR 2004-VI;De Haes and Gijsels v. Belgium, 24 February 1997, \u00a7 37, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-I;Editorial Board of Pravoye Delo and Shtekel v. Ukraine, no. 33014\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 60-68, ECHR 2011 (extracts);Hachette Filipacchi Associ\u00e9s v. France, no. 71111\/01, 14 June 2007;Hertel v. Switzerland, 25 August 1998, \u00a7 46, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-VI;Incal v. Turkey, 9 June 1998, \u00a7 54, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-IV;Jersild v. Denmark, 23 September 1994, \u00a7 31, Series A no. 298;Krone Verlag GmbH & Co. KG v. Austria (no. 4), no. 72331\/01, 9 November 2006;Lindon, Otchakovsky-Laurens and July v. France [GC], nos. 21279\/02 and 36448\/02, ECHR 2007-IV;MGN Limited v. the United Kingdom, no. 39401\/04, \u00a7 142, 18 January 2011;Mosley v. the United Kingdom, no. 48009\/08, \u00a7 111, 10 May 2011;Mouvement ra\u00eblien suisse v. Switzerland [GC], no. 16354\/06, \u00a7 48, ECHR 2012 (extracts);P\u00e9rez de Rada Cavanilles v. Spain, 28 October 1998, \u00a7 43, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-VIII;Pfeifer v. Austria, no. 12556\/03, \u00a7 35, 15 November 2007;Polanco Torres and Movilla Polanco v. Spain, no. 34147\/06, \u00a7 40, 21 September 2010;Prager and Oberschlick v. Austria, 26 April 1995, \u00a7 38, Series A no. 313;Radio France and Others v. France, no. 53984\/00, \u00a7\u00a7 20 and 30, ECHR 2004-II;Steel and Morris v. the United Kingdom, no. 68416\/01, \u00a7 87, ECHR 2005-II;Tammer v. Estonia, no. 41205\/98, \u00a7 62, ECHR 2001-I;Timciuc v. Romania (dec.), no. 28999\/03, \u00a7 144, 12 October 2010;Times Newspapers Ltd v. the United Kingdom (nos. 1 and 2), nos. 3002\/03 and 23676\/03, \u00a7\u00a7 20, 21 and 38, ECHR 2009;Von Hannover v. Germany (no. 2) [GC], nos. 40660\/08 and 60641\/08, ECHR 2012", "external_sources": "Directive 2000\/31\/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2000 on certain legal aspects of information society services, in particular electronic commerce, in the Internal Market", "conclusion": "Preliminary objections dismissed (Article 35-3 - Ratione materiae);No violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression -{General} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression)", "separate_opinion": "FALSE", "judges": "Dmitry Dedov;Elisabeth Steiner;Isabelle Berro-Lef\u00e8vre;Julia Laffranque;Khanlar Hajiyev;Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska;Ksenija Turkovi\u0107", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1010JUD006456909" }, "332": { "webcast_id": "6456909_09072014", "hearing_date": "2014-07-09 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Delfi AS v. Estonia (no. 64569\/09)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "64569\/09", "case_id": "001-116334", "case_name": "DELFI AS v. ESTONIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-116334", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "2011-02-11 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "OTSMANN V.", "respondent": "EST", "articles": "10", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "", "separate_opinion": "FALSE", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "333": { "webcast_id": "4647011_18062014", "hearing_date": "2014-06-18 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Parillo v. Italy (no. 46470\/11)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "46470\/11", "case_id": "001-157263", "case_name": "CASE OF PARRILLO v. ITALY", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-157263", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2015-08-27 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Section 13 of Law no. 40\/2004 of 19 February 2004, in force since 10 March 2004 (\u201cRules governing medically assisted fertilisation\u201d)", "represented_by": "PAOLETTI N. ; SARTORI C. ; PAOLETTI N.", "respondent": "ITA", "articles": "8;8-1;8-2;34;35;35-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "A, B and C v. Ireland [GC], no. 25579\/05, ECHR 2010;Ali Ko\u00e7intar v. Turkey (dec.), no. 77429\/12, 1 July 2014;Beyeler v. Italy [GC], no. 33202\/96, \u00a7 100, ECHR 2000 I;Broniowski v. Poland [GC], no. 31443\/96, \u00a7 129, ECHR 2004 V;Brozicek v. Italy, no. 10964\/84, 19 December 1989, \u00a7 34, Series A no. 167;C.G.I.L. and Cofferati v. Italy, no. 46967\/07, \u00a7 48, 24 February 2009;Christine Goodwin v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 28957\/95, \u00a7 85, ECHR 2002 VI;\u00c7\u0131nar v. Turkey, no. 17864\/91, decision of the Commission of 5 September 1994;Costa and Pavan v. Italy, no. 54270\/10, 28 August 2012;Dickson v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 44362\/04, \u00a7 78, ECHR 2007 V;Dudgeon v. the United Kingdom, 22 October 1981, \u00a7 41, Series A no. 45;Evans v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 6339\/05, ECHR 2007 I;Frett\u00e9 v. France, no. 36515\/97, \u00a7 41, ECHR 2002 I;Gratzinger and Gratzingerova v. the Czech Republic (dec.), no. 39794\/98, \u00a7 69, ECHR 2002 VII;Gri\u0161ankova and Gri\u0161ankovs v. Latvia (dec.), no. 36117\/02, ECHR 2003 II (extracts);Hasan Uzun v. Turkey (dec.), no. 10755\/13, \u00a7\u00a7 25-27, 30 April 2013;Iatridis v. Greece [GC], no. 31107\/96, \u00a7 54, ECHR 1999 II;Immobiliare Saffi v. Italy [GC], no. 22774\/93, \u00a7 42, ECHR 1999 V;K. and T. v. Finland [GC], no. 25702\/94, \u00a7 154, ECHR 2001 VII;Knecht v. Romania, no. 10048\/10, 2 October 2012;Kopeck\u00fd v. Slovakia [GC], no. 44912\/98, \u00a7 52, ECHR 2004 IX;Kutzner v. Germany, no. 46544\/99, \u00a7 65, ECHR 2002 I;Leandro Da Silva v. Luxembourg, no. 30273\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 40 and 42, 11 February 2010;M.C. and Others v. Italy, no. 5376\/11, \u00a7 47, 3 September 2013;McFarlane v. Ireland [GC], no. 31333\/06, 10 September 2010;Meln\u012btis v. Latvia, no. 30779\/05, \u00a7 50, 28 February 2012;Mifsud v. France (dec.) [GC], no. 57220\/00, \u00a7 15, ECHR 2002 VIII;Norris v. Ireland, 26 October 1988, Series A no. 142;Olsson v. Sweden (no. 1), 24 March 1988, \u00a7 68, Series A no. 130;P., C. and S. v. the United Kingdom, no. 56547\/00, \u00a7 114, ECHR 2002 VI;Pretty v. the United Kingdom, no. 2346\/02, \u00a7 61, ECHR 2002 III;S.A.S. v. France ([GC], no. 43835\/11, ECHR 2014 (extracts);S.B. and Others v. Belgium (dec.), no. 63403\/00, 6 April 2004;S.H. and Others v. Austria ([GC], no. 57813\/00, ECHR 2011;Scoppola v. Italy (no. 2) [GC], no. 10249\/03, \u00a7 75, 17 September 2009;Union Alimentaria Sanders SA v. Spain, no. 11681\/85, 11 December 1987 DR 54, pp. 101 and 104;Vallianatos and Others v. Greece ([GC], nos. 29381\/09 and 32684\/09, \u00a7 54, ECHR 2013 (extracts);Vallianatos and Others v. Greece [GC], nos. 29381\/09 and 32684\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 52-58, ECHR 2013 (extracts);Vu\u010dkovi\u0107 and Others v. Serbia [GC], no. 17153\/11, \u00a7\u00a7 69-77, 25 March 2014;W. v. Germany, no.10785\/84, 18 July 1986, Decisions and Reports (DR) 48, p. 104;X, Y and Z v. the United Kingdom, 22 April 1997, \u00a7 44, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997 II", "external_sources": "Articles 18 and 27 of the \u201cOviedo Convention\u201d;Opinion no. 15, adopted on 14 November 2000 by the European Group on Ethics in Science and New Technologies to the European Commission;Resolution 1352 (2003) of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe on Human Stem Cell Research;Regulation (EC) No. 1394 \/ 2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 November 2007 on advanced therapy medicinal products contain similar provisions", "conclusion": "Preliminary objection dismissed (Article 35-1 - Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Six month period);Preliminary objection dismissed (Article 34 - Victim);Remainder inadmissible;No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Andr\u00e1s Saj\u00f3;Ann Power-Forde;Dean Spielmann;Dmitry Dedov;Ganna Yudkivska;George Nicolaou;Guido Raimondi;Helen Keller;Ineta Ziemele;Josep Casadevall;Julia Laffranque;Mark Villiger;Neboj\u0161a Vu\u010dini\u0107;Paulo Pinto De Albuquerque;Peer Lorenzen;Vincent A. De Gaetano", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0827JUD004647011" }, "334": { "webcast_id": "4647011_18062014", "hearing_date": "2014-06-18 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Parillo v. Italy (no. 46470\/11)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "46470\/11", "case_id": "001-141613", "case_name": "PARRILLO v. ITALY", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-141613", "type": "DECISIONS", "typedescription": 9, "document_date": "", "collection": "CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG", "importance": 3, "court": "5", "issue": "", "represented_by": "PAOLETTI N. ; SARTORI PC.", "respondent": "ITA", "articles": "8;10;35;35-3;P1-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Partly inadmissible", "separate_opinion": "", "judges": "Danut\u00e9 Jocien\u00e9;Guido Raimondi;Neboj\u0161a Vu\u010dini\u0107;Paulo Pinto De Albuquerque;Peer Lorenzen", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0528DEC004647011" }, "335": { "webcast_id": "3534305_04062014", "hearing_date": "2014-06-04 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Vasiliauskas v. Lithuania (no. 35343\/05) ", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "35343\/05", "case_id": "001-158290", "case_name": "CASE OF VASILIAUSKAS v. LITHUANIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-158290", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2015-10-20 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Articles 71 \u00a7 2 and 99 of the Lithuanian Criminal Code", "represented_by": "VILCINSKAS S.", "respondent": "LTU", "articles": "7;7-1;7-2;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "C.R. v. the United Kingdom, 22 November 1995, \u00a7 34, Series A no. 335 C;Del Rio Prada v. Spain [GC], no. 42750\/09, ECHR 2013;Donohoe v. Ireland, no. 19165\/08, \u00a7 73, 12 December 2013;Elsholz v. Germany [GC], no. 25735\/94, \u00a7 66, ECHR 2000 VIII;Jorgic v. Germany, no. 74613\/01, \u00a7\u00a7 101-102, ECHR 2007 III;K.-H.W. v. Germany, [GC], no. 37201\/97, \u00a7 74, ECHR 2001 II (extracts);Kiprit\u00e7i v. Turkey, no. 14294\/04, \u00a7 18, 3 June 2008;Kokkinakis v. Greece, 25 May 1993, \u00a7 52, Series A no. 260 A;Kolk and Kislyiy v. Estonia (dec.), nos. 23052\/04 and 24018\/04, ECHR 2006 I;Kononov v. Latvia [GC], no. 36376\/04, ECHR 2010;Korbely v. Hungary [GC], no. 9174\/02, ECHR 2008;Maktouf and Damjanovi\u0107 v. Bosnia and Herzegovina [GC], nos. 2312\/08 and 34179\/08, ECHR 2013 (extracts);Penart v. Estonia (dec.), 14685\/04, 24 January 2006;Pessino v. France, no. 40403\/02, \u00a7 33, 10 October 2006;S.W. v. the United Kingdom, 22 November 1995, \u00a7 36, Series A no. 335 B;Scoppola v. Italy (no. 2) [GC], no. 10249\/03, \u00a7 93, 17 September 2009;Streletz, Kessler and Krenz v. Germany [GC], nos. 34044\/96, 35532\/97 and 44801\/98, \u00a7 50, ECHR 2001 II;Waite and Kennedy v. Germany [GC], no. 26083\/94, \u00a7 54, ECHR 1999 I;\u017ddanoka v. Latvia [GC], no. 58278\/00, \u00a7 96, ECHR 2006 IV", "external_sources": "United Nations General Assembly Resolution 96 (I), adopted on 11 December 1946;Articles I, II and V of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide adopted on 9 December 1948;Convention on the Non-Applicability of Statutory Limitations to War Crimes and Crimes Against Humanity of 26 November 1968;Statute of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY Statute) of 1993;Statute of the International Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR Statute) of 1994;Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC Statute) of 1998;Control Council Law no. 10;1953 international treaty law;Article 31 \u00a7 1 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties\n", "conclusion": "Violation of Article 7 - No punishment without law (Article 7-1 - Nullum crimen sine lege;Retroactivity;Criminal offence;Article 7-2 - Criminal offence);Pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Andr\u00e1s Saj\u00f3;Andr\u00e9 Potocki;Ann Power-Forde;Dean Spielmann;Egidijus K\u016bris;Guido Raimondi;Ineta Ziemele;Jon Fridrik Kj\u00f8lbro;Josep Casadevall;Khanlar Hajiyev;Mark Villiger;Neboj\u0161a Vu\u010dini\u0107;Paulo Pinto De Albuquerque;Peer Lorenzen;Ksenija Turkovi\u0107", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1020JUD003534305" }, "336": { "webcast_id": "3534305_04062014", "hearing_date": "2014-06-04 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Vasiliauskas v. Lithuania (no. 35343\/05) ", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "35343\/05", "case_id": "001-113089", "case_name": "VASILIAUSKAS v. LITHUANIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-113089", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "2009-06-16 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "N\/A", "respondent": "LTU", "articles": "7;7-2", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Communicated", "separate_opinion": "FALSE", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "337": { "webcast_id": "2936910_21052014", "hearing_date": "2014-05-21 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Morice v. France (no. 29369\/10) ", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "29369\/10", "case_id": "001-154265", "case_name": "CASE OF MORICE v. FRANCE", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-154265", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2015-04-23 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Articles 23, 29 and 31 of the Freedom of the Press Act of 29 July 1881 ; Article 11, paragraph 3, of the Code of Criminal Procedure", "represented_by": "AUDHOUI C. ; TARDIF J.", "respondent": "FRA", "articles": "6;6-1;10;10-1;10-2;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "A v. Finland (dec.), no 44998\/98, 8 January 2004;Amihalachioaie v. Moldova, no 60115\/00, ECHR 2004-III;Andr\u00e9 and Another v. France, no. 18603\/03, \u00a7 42, 24 July 2008;Andrushko v. Russia, no 4260\/04, \u00a7 53, 14 October 2010;Animal Defenders International v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 48876\/08, \u00a7 100, ECHR 2013;Axel Springer AG v. Germany [GC], no 39954\/08, \u00a7 90, ECHR 2012;Beyeler v. Italy (just satisfaction) [GC], no 33202\/96, \u00a7 27, 28 May 2002;Bladet Troms\u00f8 and Stensaas v. Norway [GC], no 21980\/93, \u00a7 62, ECHR 1999-III;Brasilier v. France, no 71343\/01, 11 April 2006;Casado Coca v. Spain, 24 February 1994, \u00a7 46, Series A no 285-A;Castells v. Spain, 23 April 1992, \u00a7 46, Series A no 236;Castillo Algar v. Spain, 28 October 1998, \u00a7 45, Reports 1998-VIII;Chauvy and Others v. France, no 64915\/01, \u00a7 78, ECHR 2004-VI;Coutant v. France (dec.), no 17155\/03, 24 January 2008;Cump\u0103n\u0103 and Maz\u0103re v. Romania [GC], no 33348\/96, \u00a7 114, ECHR 2004 XI;De Cubber v. Belgium, 26 October 1984, Series A no 86;De Haes and Gijsels v. Belgium, 24 February 1997, Reports 1997-I;Delcourt v. Belgium, 17 January 1970, \u00a7 25, Series A no 11;Di Giovanni v. Italy, no 51160\/06, \u00a7 71, 9 July 2013;Dilipak and Karakaya v. Turkey, nos. 7942\/05 and 24838\/05, \u00a7 141, 4 March 2012;E.K. v. Turkey, no 28496\/95, \u00a7\u00a7 79-80, 7 February 2002;Feldek v. Slovakia, no 29032\/95, \u00a7 86, ECHR 2001 VIII;Foglia v. Switzerland, no 35865\/04, 13 December 2007;Gouveia Gomes Fernandes and Freitas e Costa v. Portugal, no 1529\/08, 29 March 2011;Gu\u00e9rin v. France, 29 July 1998, \u00a7 44, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 V;Handyside v. the United Kingdom, 7 December 1976, Series A no 24;Hasan Yaz\u0131c\u0131 v. Turkey, no 40877\/07, \u00a7 54, 15 April 2014;Hauschildt v. Denmark, 24 May 1989, \u00a7 47, Series A no 154;Iatridis v. Greece [GC] (just satisfaction), no 31107\/96, \u00a7 54, ECHR 2000-XI;Incal v. Turkey [GC], 9 June 1998, \u00a7 54, Reports 1998-IV;July and SARL Lib\u00e9ration v. France, no 20893\/03, \u00a7 74, ECHR 2008 (extracts);Karpetas v. Greece, no 6086\/10, 30 October 2012;Kudeshkina v. Russia, no29492\/05, \u00a7 86, 26 February 2009;Kuri\u0107 and Others v. Slovenia (just satisfaction) [GC], no 26828\/06, ECHR 2014;Kyprianou v. Cyprus [GC], no 73797\/01, ECHR 2005-XIII;Lehideux and Isorni v. France, 23 September 1998, \u00a7 57, Reports 1998-VII;Lindon, Otchakovsky-Laurens and July v. France [GC], nos. 21279\/02 and 36448\/02, ECHR 2007 IV;Lingens v. Austria, 8 July 1986, Series A no 10;Louis v. France, no 44301\/02, \u00a7 27, 14 November 2006;Micallef v. Malta [GC], no 17056\/06, ECHR 2009;Mor v. France, no 28198\/09, 15 December 2011;Nikula v. Finland, no 31611\/96, ECHR 2002-II;Oberschlick v. Austria (no 1), 23 May 1991, \u00a7 63, Series A no 204;Oberschlick v. Austria (no 2), 1 July 1997, \u00a7 33, Reports 1997-IV;Omar v. France, 29 July 1998, \u00a7 41, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 V;Ormanni v. Italy, no 30278\/04, \u00a7 73, 17 July 2007;Otegi Mondragon v. Spain, 15 March 2011, \u00a7 58, ECHR 2011;\u00d6zt\u00fcrk v. Turkey [GC], 28 September 1999, \u00a7 66, Reports 1999-VI;Paturel v. France, no 54968\/00, 22 December 2005;Prager and Oberschlick v. Austria, 26 April 1995, \u00a7 34, Series A no 313;Pullar v. the United Kingdom, 10 June 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-III;Roland Dumas v. France, no 34875\/07, \u00a7 43, 15 July 2010;Sch\u00f6pfer v. Switzerland, 20 May 1998, \u00a7\u00a7 29-30, Reports 1998-III;Sialkowska v. Poland, no 8932\/05, \u00a7 111, 22 March 2007;Steel and Morris v. the United Kingdom, no 68416\/01, \u00a7 95, Reports 2005-II;Steur v. the Netherlands, no. 39657\/98, \u00a7 38, ECHR 2003-XI;Stoll v. Switzerland ([GC], no 69698\/01, \u00a7 101, ECHR 2007-V;S\u00fcrek v. Turkey [no 1] [GC], no 26682\/95, ECHR 1999-IV;Thoma v. Luxembourg, no 38432\/97, \u00a7 57, ECHR 2001-III;Van der Mussele v. Belgium, 23 November 1983, Series A no 70;Veraart v. the Netherlands, no 10807\/04, \u00a7 51, 30 November 2006;Worm v. Austria, 29 August 1997, \u00a7 40, Reports 1997-V", "external_sources": "Charter of Core Principles of the European Legal Profession of the Council of Bars and Law Societies of Europe, 24 November 2006;Judgment of the International Court of Justice of 4 June 2008 in the case of Djibouti v. France", "conclusion": "Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Impartial tribunal);Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression -{General} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression);Pecuniary damage - award;Non-pecuniary damage - award", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Ale\u0161 Pejchal;Andr\u00e9 Potocki;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Ann Power-Forde;Dean Spielmann;Egidijus K\u016bris;Erik M\u00f8se;Ganna Yudkivska;George Nicolaou;Guido Raimondi;Ineta Ziemele;Johannes Silvis;Josep Casadevall;Julia Laffranque;Luis L\u00f3pez Guerra;Mark Villiger;Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska;Paul Lemmens;Zdravka Kalaydjieva;Ksenija Turkovi\u0107", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0423JUD002936910" }, "338": { "webcast_id": "2936910_21052014", "hearing_date": "2014-05-21 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Morice v. France (no. 29369\/10) ", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "29369\/10", "case_id": "001-122787", "case_name": "CASE OF MORICE v. FRANCE", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-122787", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2013-07-11 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 3, "court": "23", "issue": "", "represented_by": "AUDHOUI C. ; TARDIF J.", "respondent": "FRA", "articles": "6;6-1;10;10-1;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Amihalachioaie v. Moldova, no 60115\/00, \u00a7\u00a7 27-28, ECHR 2004-III;Brunet-Lecomte and Others v. France, no 42117\/04, 5 February 2009, \u00a7 51;Casado Coca v. Spain, 24 February 1994, \u00a7 54, Series A no 285-A;Cumpana and Mazare v. Romania [GC], no 33348\/96, \u00a7 111, ECHR 2004-XI;Foglia v. Switzerland, no 35865\/04, \u00a7 95, 13 December 2007;Huglo Lepage and Associ\u00e9s SCP v. France (dec.), no 59477\/00, 30 March 2004;July and Sarl Lib\u00e9ration v. France, no 20893\/03, \u00a7 66, ECHR 2008 (extracts);Kudeshkina v. Russia, no 29492\/05, \u00a7 94, 26 February 2009;Lindon, Otchakovsky-Laurens and July v. France [GC], nos. 21279\/02 and 36448\/02, ECHR 2007-XI;Micallef v. Malta, [GC], no 17056\/06, ECHR 2009;Prager and Oberschlick v. Austria, judgment of 26 April 1995, Series A no 313, \u00a7 34;Radio France and Others v. France du 30 March 2004, no 53984\/00, \u00a7 40, ECHR 2004-II;Remli v. France, 23 April 1996, \u00a7 33, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-II;Rizos and Daskas v. Greece, no. 65545\/01, \u00a7 43, 27 May 2004;Roussin v. France (dec.), no 44674\/08, 19 October 2010;Sch\u00f6pfer v. Switzerland, 20 May 1998, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-III;Selmouni v. France [GC], no 25803\/94, \u00a7 74, ECHR 1999-V", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Impartial tribunal);No violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression -{General} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed;Non-pecuniary damage - award", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Ale\u0161 Pejchal;Andr\u00e9 Potocki;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Ganna Yudkivska;Josep Casadevall;Mark Villiger;Nicolas Bratza;Paul Lemmens", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0711JUD002936910" }, "339": { "webcast_id": "2401405_16042014", "hearing_date": "2014-04-16 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Mustafa Tun\u00e7 and Fecire Tun\u00e7 v. Turkey (no. 24014\/05)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "24014\/05", "case_id": "001-154007", "case_name": "CASE OF MUSTAFA TUN\u00c7 AND FEC\u0130RE TUN\u00c7 v. TURKEY", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-154007", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 14, "document_date": "2015-04-14 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 2, "court": "8", "issue": "", "represented_by": "MULLER M. ; BUTLER M. ; VINE C. ; YILDIZ K. ; KARAKAS S.", "respondent": "TUR", "articles": "2;2-1;34", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Akta\u015f v. Turkey, no. 24351\/94, \u00a7 301, ECHR 2003 V;Alp v. Turkey (dec.), no. 3757\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 27-33, 9 July 2013;Al-Skeini and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 55721\/07, ECHR 2011;Anguelova v. Bulgaria, no. 38361\/97, \u00a7 138, ECHR 2002 IV;An\u0131k and Others v. Turkey, no. 63758\/00, \u00a7\u00a7 76-77, 5 June 2007;Aslakhanova and Others v. Russia, nos. 2944\/06, 8300\/07, 50184\/07, 332\/08 and 42509\/10, \u00a7 235, 18 December 2012;Ataykaya v. Turkey, no. 50275\/08, \u00a7 47, 22 July 2014;Aydan v. Turkey, no. 16281\/10, \u00a7 69, 12 March 2013;Barbu Anghelescu v. Romania, no. 46430\/99, 5 October 2004;Bekta\u015f and \u00d6zalp v. Turkey, no. 10036\/03, \u00a7 66, 20 April 2010;Ble\u010di\u0107 v. Croatia [GC], no. 59532\/00, \u00a7\u00a7 66 et seq., ECHR 2006 III;Bursuc v. Romania, no. 42066\/98, \u00a7\u00a7 107-109, 12 October 2004;Calvelli and Ciglio v. Italy [GC], no. 32967\/96, \u00a7\u00a7 51 et seq., ECHR 2002 I;Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin C\u00e2mpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848\/08, \u00a7 147, 17 July 2014;Dobriyeva and Others v Russia, no. 18407\/10, \u00a7 72, 19 December 2013;Dumitru Popescu v. Romania (no. 1), no. 49234\/99, \u00a7\u00a7 75 et seq., 26 April 2007;\u0110ur\u0111evi\u0107 v. Croatia, no. 52442\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 89-91, ECHR 2011;Edwards v. the United Kingdom, 16 December 1992, \u00a7 34, Series A no 247-B;Emars v. Latvia, no. 22412\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 85 and 95, 18 November 2014;Enukidze and Girgvliani v. Georgia, no. 25091\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 247 et seq., 26 April 2011;Erkan v. Turkey (dec.), no. 41792\/10, \u00a7\u00a7 54-62, 28 January 2014;Giuliani and Gaggio v. Italy [GC], no. 23458\/02, ECHR 2011;Grimailovs v. Latvia, no. 6087\/03, \u00a7 114, 25 June 2013;G\u00fcle\u00e7 v. Turkey, 27 July 1998, Reports 1998 IV;G\u00fcrtekin and Others v. Cyprus (dec.), nos. 60441\/13, 68206\/13 and 68667\/13, 11 March 2014;Hugh Jordan v. the United Kingdom, no. 24746\/94, \u00a7 109, ECHR 2001 III;Jaloud v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 47708\/08, \u00a7 186, ECHR 2014;Kaya v. Turkey, 19 February 1998, \u00a7 89, Reports 1998 I;Kelly and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 30054\/96, \u00a7 105, 4 May 2001;Kolevi v. Bulgaria, no. 1108\/02, \u00a7 201, 5 November 2009;Kuri\u0107 and Others v. Slovenia [GC], no. 26828\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 258 et seq., ECHR 2012 (extracts);Leyla Alp and Others v. Turkey, no. 29675\/02, \u00a7 76, 10 December 2013;Mantog v. Romania, no. 2893\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 70 et seq., 11 October 2007;Mastromatteo v. Italy [GC], no. 37703\/97, \u00a7 90, ECHR 2002 VIII;McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, 27 September 1995, \u00a7\u00a7 161-163, Series A no. 324;McKerr v. the United Kingdom, no. 28883\/95, \u00a7 129, ECHR 2001 III;Menson v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 47916\/99, ECHR 2003-V;Nachova and Others v. Bulgaria [GC], nos. 43577\/98 and 43579\/98, \u00a7 160, ECHR 2005 VII;Nikolova and Velichkova v. Bulgaria, no. 7888\/03, \u00a7 55, 20 December 2007;Odi\u00e8vre v. France [GC], no. 42326\/98, \u00a7 22, ECHR 2003 III;O\u011fur v. Turkey [GC], no. 21594\/93, \u00a7\u00a7 90-91, ECHR 1999 III;Orhan v. Turkey, no. 25656\/94, \u00a7 342, 18 June 2002;Pankov v. Bulgaria, no. 12773\/03, \u00a7 54, 7 October 2010;Pereira Henriques v. Luxembourg, no. 60255\/00, \u00a7 56, 9 May 2006;Perevedentsevy v. Russia, no. 39583\/05, \u00a7 107, 24 April 2014;Perez v. France [GC], no. 47287\/99, \u00a7 67, ECHR 2004-I;Putintseva v. Russia, no. 33498\/04, \u00a7 52, 10 May 2012;Ramsahai and Others v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 52391\/99, \u00a7 359, ECHR 2007 II;Rupa v. Romania (no. 1), no. 58478\/00, \u00a7\u00a7123 and 124, 16 December 2008;Sa\u00e7\u0131l\u0131k and Others v. Turkey, nos. 43044\/05 and 45001\/05, \u00a7 98, 5 July 2011;Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986\/93, \u00a7 83, ECHR 2000-VII;\u015eandru and Others v. Romania, no. 22465\/03, \u00a7 74, 8 December 2009;Sergey Shevchenko v. Ukraine, no. 32478\/02, 4 April 2006;Stefan v. Romania (dec.), no. 5650\/04, \u00a7 48, 29 November 2011;Svinarenko and Slyadnev v. Russia [GC], nos. 32541\/08 and 43441\/08, \u00a7 79, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Tanr\u0131bilir v. Turkey, no. 21422\/93, \u00a7\u00a7 54 85, 16 November 2000;Tanr\u0131kulu v. Turkey [GC], no. 23763\/94, ECHR 1999 IV;Tikhonova v. Russia, no. 13596\/05, \u00a7 82, 30 April 2014;Trufin v. Romania, no. 3990\/04, \u00a7 52, 20 October 2009;Velcea and Maz\u0103re v. Romania, no. 64301\/01, \u00a7\u00a7 113-114, 1 December 2009;Velikova v. Bulgaria, no. 41488\/98, \u00a7 80, ECHR 2000 VI;Vo v. France [GC], no. 53924\/00, \u00a7 90, ECHR 2004 VIII;Yotova v. Bulgaria, no. 43606\/04, \u00a7 68, 23 October 2012", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Preliminary objection dismissed (Article 34 - Victim);No violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Andr\u00e1s Saj\u00f3;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Dean Spielmann;Guido Raimondi;Helen Keller;Helena J\u00e4derblom;Ineta Ziemele;Josep Casadevall;Krzysztof Wojtyczek;Luis L\u00f3pez Guerra;Mark Villiger;Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska;Neboj\u0161a Vu\u010dini\u0107;Nona Tsotsoria;Paul Lemmens;Peer Lorenzen;Robert Spano;Vincent A. De Gaetano;Zdravka Kalaydjieva", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0414JUD002401405" }, "340": { "webcast_id": "2401405_16042014", "hearing_date": "2014-04-16 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Mustafa Tun\u00e7 and Fecire Tun\u00e7 v. Turkey (no. 24014\/05)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "24014\/05", "case_id": "001-122247", "case_name": "CASE OF MUSTAFA TUN\u00c7 AND FEC\u0130RE TUN\u00c7 v. TURKEY", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-122247", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2013-06-25 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 3, "court": "5", "issue": "", "represented_by": "N\/A", "respondent": "TUR", "articles": "2;2-1;35;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Abdurashidova v. Russia, no 32968\/05, \u00a7 69, 8 April 2010;Al-Skeini and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 55721\/07, \u00a7 167, ECHR 2011;Angelova v. Bulgaria, no 38361\/97, \u00a7 138, ECHR 2002-IV;Anik and Others v. Turkey, no 63758\/00, \u00a7\u00a7 76-77, 5 June 2007;Beker v. Turkey, no 27866\/03, 24 March 2009;Giuliani and Gaggio v. Italy [GC], no 23458\/02, ECHR 2011;G\u00fcrkan v. Turkey (no 10987\/10, \u00a7\u00a7 13 to 19, 3 July 2012;Hugh Jordan v. the United Kingdom, no 24746\/94, \u00a7 109, ECHR 2001-III;Kolevi v. Bulgaria, no 1108\/02, \u00a7 201, 5 November 2009;Mantog v. Romania no 2893\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 70 et seq., 11 October 2007;McKerr v. the United Kingdom, no 28883\/95, \u00a7 129, ECHR 2001-III;Pankov v. Bulgaria, no 12773\/03, \u00a7 59, 7 October 2010;Ramsahai and Others v. the Netherlands [GC], no 52391\/99, ECHR 2007-II;Salman v. Turkey ([GC], no 21986\/93, \u00a7 99, ECHR 2000-VII;Selmouni v. France [GC], no 25803\/94, \u00a7 87, ECHR 1999-V;\u0160ilih v. Slovenia [GC], no 71463\/01, \u00a7 157, 9 April 2009;Stefan v. Romania (dec.), no 5650\/04, \u00a7 48, 29 November 2011;Stern v. France (dec.), no 70820\/01, 11 October 2005;Suprun v. Ukraine (dec.), no 7529\/07, 27 April 2010;Tr\u00e9valec v. Belgium, no. 30812\/07, \u00a7 89, 14 June 2011;Trufin v. Romania, no 3990\/04, \u00a7 52, 20 October 2009;Velcea and Mazare v. Romania, no 64301\/01, 1 December 2009;Yotova v. Bulgaria, no 43606\/04, \u00a7 68, 23 October 2012", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Non-pecuniary damage - award", "separate_opinion": "FALSE", "judges": "Andr\u00e1s Saj\u00f3;Guido Raimondi;Helen Keller;Neboj\u0161a Vu\u010dini\u0107;Peer Lorenzen", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0625JUD002401405" }, "341": { "webcast_id": "4770808_19022014", "hearing_date": "2014-02-19 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Jaloud v. the Netherlands (no. 47708\/08) ", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "47708\/08", "case_id": "001-148367", "case_name": "CASE OF JALOUD v. THE NETHERLANDS", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-148367", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2014-11-20 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Article 38 of the Military Criminal Code ; Article 12 of the Code of Criminal Procedure", "represented_by": "ZEGVELD L. ; EIKELBOOM A.W.", "respondent": "NLD", "articles": "1;2;2-1;2-2;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Al Jedda v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 27021\/08, \u00a7 77, ECHR 2011;Al-Skeini and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 55721\/07, ECHR 2011;Assanidze v. Georgia [GC], no. 71503\/01, \u00a7\u00a7 202-203, ECHR 2004 II;Bankovi\u0107 and Others v. Belgium and Others (dec.) [GC], no. 52207\/99, ECHR 2001 XII;Catan and Others v. the Republic of Moldova and Russia [GC], nos. 43370\/04, 8252\/05 and 18454\/06, ECHR 2012 (extracts);Catan and Others v. Moldova and Russia judgment [GC], nos. 43370\/04, 8252\/05 and 18454\/06, ECHR 2012;Cyprus v. Turkey [GC], no. 25781\/94, ECHR 2001 IV;Dowsett v. the United Kingdom, no. 39482\/98, \u00a7 41, ECHR 2003 VII;Edwards v. the United Kingdom, 16 December 1992, \u00a7 36, Series A no. 247 B;Finucane v. the United Kingdom, no. 29178\/95, \u00a7 69, ECHR 2003 VIII;Giuliani and Gaggio v. Italy [GC], no. 23458\/02, \u00a7 301, ECHR 2011;Hugh Jordan v. the United Kingdom, no. 24746\/94, \u00a7 107, ECHR 2001 III (extracts);Hutten-Czapska v. Poland [GC], no. 35014\/97, \u00a7\u00a7 238-239, ECHR 2006 VIII;I.J.L. and Others v. the United Kingdom, nos. 29522\/95, 30056\/96 and 30574\/96, \u00a7 112, ECHR 2000 IX;Ila\u015fcu and Others v. Moldova and Russia [GC], no. 48787\/99, ECHR 2004 VII;Isayeva v. Russia, no. 57950\/00, \u00a7 173, 24 February 2005;K. v. Italy, no. 38805\/97, \u00a7 21, ECHR 2004 VIII;Kaya v. Turkey, 19 February 1998, \u00a7 87, Reports 1998-I;Kelly and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 30054\/96, \u00a7 93, 4 May 2001;Loizidou v. Turkey (preliminary objections), 23 March 1995, Series A no. 310;Makaratzis v. Greece [GC], no. 50385\/99, \u00a7 74, ECHR 2004 XI;McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, 27 September 1995, \u00a7 149, Series A no. 324;McKerr v. the United Kingdom, no. 28883\/95, \u00a7 113, ECHR 2001 III;Pellegrini v. Italy, no. 30882\/96, \u00a7 40, ECHR 2001-VIII;Ramsahai and Others v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 52391\/99, ECHR 2007 II;Rowe and Davis v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 28901\/95, \u00a7 60, ECHR 2000 II;Tahsin Acar v. Turkey [GC], no. 26307\/95, \u00a7 223, ECHR 2004 III", "external_sources": "MND (SE) (Multinational Division, South East) Memorandum of Understanding;MND (C-S) (Multinational Division, Central-South) Memorandum of Understanding;Article 42 of Regulations concerning the Laws and Customs of War on Land (The Hague, 18 October 1907);Geneva Conventions of 1949;United Nations Security Council Resolution 1483;United Nations Security Council Resolution 1511;Coalition Provisional Authority Order no. 28 of 9 March 2003 (\u201cEstablishment Of The Iraqi Civil Defense Corps\u201d);Article 6 of the International Law Commission\u2019s Articles on State Responsibility;Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro), Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 2007, p. 43, \u00a7 406", "conclusion": "Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2 - Positive obligations;Article 2-1 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Non-pecuniary damage - award", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Ale\u0161 Pejchal;Alvina Gyulumyan;Andr\u00e1s Saj\u00f3;Corneliu B\u00eersan;Dean Spielmann;Elisabeth Steiner;Gilbert Guillaume;Guido Raimondi;Ineta Ziemele;Isabelle Berro-Lef\u00e8vre;J\u00e1n \u0160ikuta;Johannes Silvis;Josep Casadevall;Kristina Pardalos;Luis L\u00f3pez Guerra;Mark Villiger;P\u00e4ivi Hirvel\u00e4;Zdravka Kalaydjieva", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1120JUD004770808" }, "342": { "webcast_id": "4770808_19022014", "hearing_date": "2014-02-19 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Jaloud v. the Netherlands (no. 47708\/08) ", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "47708\/08", "case_id": "001-114929", "case_name": "JALOUD v. THE NETHERLANDS", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-114929", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "2011-12-06 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "ZEGVELD L.", "respondent": "NLD", "articles": "2", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "", "separate_opinion": "FALSE", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "343": { "webcast_id": "2921712_12022014", "hearing_date": "2014-02-12 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Tarakhel v. Switzerland (no. 29217\/12)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "29217\/12", "case_id": "001-148070", "case_name": "CASE OF TARAKHEL v. SWITZERLAND", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-148070", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2014-11-04 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "", "represented_by": "BREGNARD ECOFFEY C. (SAJE)", "respondent": "CHE", "articles": "3;35;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Aksu v. Turkey [GC], nos. 4149\/04 and 41029\/04, \u00a7 43, ECHR 2012;Beldjoudi v. France, 26 March 1992, \u00a7\u00a7 79 and 86, Series A no 234-A;Bosphorus Hava Yollar\u0131 Turizm ve Ticaret Anonim \u015eirketi v. Ireland ([GC], no 45036\/98, ECHR 2005 VI;Budina v. Russia, (dec.), no 45603\/05, 18 June 2009;Chapman v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 27238\/95, \u00a7 99, ECHR 2001 I;Guerra and Others v. Italy, 19 February 1998, \u00a7 44, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 I;H.L.R. v. France, 29 April 1997, \u00a7 34, Reports 1997-III;Halil Y\u00fcksel Ak\u0131nc\u0131 v. Turkey, no 39125\/04, \u00a7 54, 11 December 2012;Hirsi Jamaa and Others v. Italy [GC], no 27765\/09, \u00a7 198, ECHR 2012;Jabari v. Turkey, no 40035\/98, \u00a7 38, ECHR 2000 VIII;Kud\u0142a v. Poland [GC], no 30210\/96, \u00a7 91, ECHR 2000-XI;M. and Others v. Bulgaria, no 41416\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 105 and 143, 26 July 2011;M.S.S. v. Belgium and Greece ([GC], no 30696\/09, ECHR 2011;Michaud v. France, no 12323\/11, \u00a7\u00a7 102-104, ECHR 2012;Mohammed Hussein and Others v. the Netherlands and Italy ((dec.), no 27725\/10, \u00a7 78, 2 April 2013;Mubilanzila Mayeka and Kaniki Mitunga v. Belgium, no 13178\/03, \u00a7 55, ECHR 2006 XI;M\u00fcslim v. Turkey, no 53566\/99, 26 April 2005;Nizamov and Others v. Russia, nos. 22636\/13, 24034\/13, 24334\/13, 24328\/13, \u00a7 50, 7 May 2014;Popov v. France, nos. 39472\/07 and 39474\/07, 19 January 2012;Saadi v. Italy [GC], no 37201\/06, \u00a7 152, ECHR 2008;Salah Sheekh v. the Netherlands, no 1948\/04, \u00a7 135, ECHR 2007 I;Soering v. the United Kingdom, 7 July 1989, \u00a7\u00a7 90-91, Series A no 161;Vilvarajah and Others v. the United Kingdom, 30 October 1991, \u00a7 103, Series A no 125", "external_sources": "Council Regulation (EC) No 343\/2003 of 18 February 2003 establishing the criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an asylum application lodged in one of the Member States by a third-country national (\u201cthe Dublin Regulation\u201d);Article 4 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union;Report by Nils Mui\u017enieks, Commissioner for Human Rights of the Council of Europe, published on 18 September 2012, following his visit to Italy from 3 to 6 July 2012 (CommDH(2012)26)", "conclusion": "Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Expulsion) (Conditional) (Italy);Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Andr\u00e1s Saj\u00f3;Andr\u00e9 Potocki;Dean Spielmann;Guido Raimondi;Helen Keller;Helena J\u00e4derblom;Ineta Ziemele;Isabelle Berro-Lef\u00e8vre;Josep Casadevall;Julia Laffranque;Ledi Bianku;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Mark Villiger;Neboj\u0161a Vu\u010dini\u0107;Nona Tsotsoria;Paul Lemmens;Paul Mahoney;Peer Lorenzen", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1104JUD002921712" }, "344": { "webcast_id": "4016706_05022014", "hearing_date": "2014-02-05 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Sargsyan v. Azerbaijan (no. 40167\/06) ", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "40167\/06", "case_id": "001-179555", "case_name": "CASE OF SARGSYAN v. AZERBAIJAN", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-179555", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 12, "document_date": "2017-12-12 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 2, "court": "8", "issue": "", "represented_by": "GASPARYAN N. ; OHANYAN K. ; LEACH Ph.", "respondent": "AZE", "articles": "1;8;8-1;13;19;35;35-3-a;41;46;46-2;P1-1;P1-1-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Akdivar and Others v. Turkey, 16 September 1996, \u00a7 65, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 IV;Ali\u0161i\u0107 and Others v. Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Serbia, Slovenia and the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia [GC], no. 60642\/08, ECHR 2014;Avc\u0131 and Others v. Turkey, no. 70417\/01, \u00a7 56, 27 June 2006;Centro Europa 7 S.r.l. and Di Stefano v. Italy [GC], no. 38433\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 218-223, ECHR 2012;Cyprus v. Turkey (just satisfaction) [GC], no. 25781\/94, \u00a7 56, ECHR 2014;Demopoulos and Others v. Turkey (dec.) [GC], nos. 46113\/99 and 7 others, ECHR 2010;Do\u011fan and Others v. Turkey (just satisfaction), nos. 8803\/02 and 14 others, \u00a7\u00a7 52-53, 13 July 2006;Ernestina Zullo v. Italy [GC], no. 64897\/01, \u00a7\u00a7 115-116 and 148-149, 29 March 2006;Je\u010dius v. Lithuania, no. 34578\/97, \u00a7\u00a7 41 and 109, ECHR 2000-IX;Kova\u010di\u0107 and Others v. Slovenia [GC], nos. 44574\/98, and 2 others, \u00a7\u00a7 255 256, 3 October 2008;Kuri\u0107 and Others v. Slovenia (just satisfaction) [GC], no. 26828\/06, ECHR 2014;Loizidou v. Turkey (Article 50), 28 July 1998, \u00a7 33, Reports 1998 IV;Malhous v. the Czech Republic [GC], no. 33071\/96, \u00a7\u00a7 67-71, 12 July 2001;Papamichalopoulos and Others v. Greece (Article 50), 31 October 1995, \u00a7 34, Series A no. 330 B;Solomonides v. Turkey (just satisfaction), no. 16161\/90, \u00a7\u00a7 42-43 and 47, 27 July 2010;Varnava and Others v. Turkey [GC], nos. 16064\/90 and 8 others, \u00a7 224, ECHR 2009;Verein gegen Tierfabriken Schweiz (VgT) v. Switzerland (no. 2) [GC], no. 32772\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 84-88, ECHR 2009", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Armen Harutyunyan;Branko Lubarda;Egidijus K\u016bris;Ganna Yudkivska;Guido Raimondi;Iulia Motoc;Krzysztof Wojtyczek;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Luis L\u00f3pez Guerra;M\u0101rti\u0146\u0161 Mits;Neboj\u0161a Vu\u010dini\u0107;Paul Lemmens;Robert Spano;Ksenija Turkovi\u0107", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1212JUD004016706" }, "345": { "webcast_id": "4016706_05022014", "hearing_date": "2014-02-05 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Sargsyan v. Azerbaijan (no. 40167\/06) ", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "40167\/06", "case_id": "001-155662", "case_name": "CASE OF SARGSYAN v. AZERBAIJAN", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-155662", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 14, "document_date": "2015-06-16 00:00:01", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "1958 Charter on Village Councils of Deputies of the Workers of the Azerbaijan SSR ; 1985 Instruction on Rules of Registration of Housing Facilities ; Articles 10.3 and 13 of the 1978 Constitution ; 1991 Order on \u201cProvision of Housing of Citizens who Forcibly Left Places of Permanent Residence (Refugees)\u201d ; 1991 Law on Property ; 1992 Land Code\n", "represented_by": "GASPARYAN N. ; OHANYAN K.", "respondent": "AZE", "articles": "1;8;8-1;13;19;34;35;35-1;35-3;41;P1-1;P1-1-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Akdivar and Others v. Turkey, 16 September 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 IV;Al-Skeini and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 55721\/07, \u00a7 141, ECHR 2011;Assanidze v. Georgia [GC], no. 71503\/01, \u00a7\u00a7 137-143, ECHR 2004 II;Broniowski v. Poland [GC], no. 31443\/96, ECHR 2004 V;Catan and Others v. Moldova and Russia [GC], nos. 43370\/04, 8252\/05 and 18454\/06, ECHR 2012 (extracts);Cyprus v. Turkey [GC], no. 25781\/94, ECHR 2001 IV;Damayev v. Russia, no. 36150\/04, \u00a7 108-111, 29 May 2012;Demopoulos and Others v. Turkey [GC] (dec.), nos. 46113\/99, 3843\/02, 13751\/02, 13466\/03, 10200\/04, 14163\/04, 19993\/04 and 21819\/04, ECHR 2010;Do\u011fan and Others v. Turkey, nos. 8803-8811\/02, 8813\/02 and 8815-8819\/02, ECHR 2004-VI;Elsanova v. Russia (dec.), no. 57952\/00, 15 November 2005;Gillow v. the United Kingdom, 24 November 1986, \u00a7 46, Series A no. 109;Hadri Vionnet v. Switzerland, no. 55525\/00, \u00a7 52, 14 February 2008;I\u00e7yer v. Turkey (dec.), no. 18888\/02, ECHR 2006-I;Ila\u015fcu and Others v. Moldova and Russia [GC], no. 48787\/99, ECHR 2004-VII;Ivan\u0163oc and Others v. Moldova and Russia, no. 23687\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 118-120, 15 November 2011;Jones v. the United Kindgom (dec.), no. 42639\/04, 13 September 2005;Kerimova and Others v. Russia, nos. 17170\/04, 20792\/04, 22448\/04, 23360\/04, 5681\/05 and 5684\/05, \u00a7 293, 3 May 2011;Kova\u010di\u0107 and Others v. Slovenia, nos. 44574\/98, 45133\/98 and 48316\/00, \u00a7\u00a7 255-256, 3 October 2008;Loizidou v. Turkey (preliminary objections), 23 March 1995, \u00a7\u00a7 75 and 93, Series A no. 310;Loizidou v. Turkey (merits), 18 December 1996, Reports 1996-VI;Lordos and Others v. Turkey, no. 15973\/90, \u00a7 50, 2 November 2010;Moldovan and Others and Rosta\u015f and Others v. Romania (dec.), nos. 41138\/98 and 64320\/01, 13 March 2001;Niazi Kazali and Hakan Kazali v. Cyprus (dec.), no. 49247\/08, \u00a7 132, 6 March 2012;\u00d6nery\u0131ld\u0131z v. Turkey, no. 48939\/99, \u00a7 124, ECHR 2004-XII;Orphanides v. Turkey, no. 36705\/97, \u00a7 39, 20 January 2009;Oruk v. Turkey, no. 33647\/04, \u00a7\u00a7 58-67, 4 February 2014;Pretty v. the United Kingdom, no. 2346\/02, \u00a7 61, ECHR 2002 III;Prokopovich v. Russia, no. 58255\/00, \u00a7\u00a7 36-37, ECHR 2004-XI;Sabanchiyeva and Others v. Russia, no. 38450\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 122 123, ECHR 2013 (extracts);Sargsyan v. Azerbaijan [GC] (dec.), no. 40167\/06, 14 December 2011;Sofi v. Cyprus (dec.), no. 18163\/04, 14 January 2010;Solomonides v. Turkey, no. 16161\/90, \u00a7 31, 20 January 2009;Sovtransavto Holding v. Ukraine, no. 48553\/99, \u00a7 96, ECHR 2002 VII;Xenides-Arestis v. Turkey (dec.), no. 46347\/99, 14 March 2005;Xenides-Arestis v. Turkey, no. 46347\/99, \u00a7 36, 22 December 2005", "external_sources": "Article 42 of the Regulations concerning the Laws and Customs of War on Land, The Hague, 18 October 1907;Article 15 \u00a7 7 of the UN \u201cPrinciples on Housing and Property Restitution for Refugees and Displaced Persons (United Nations, Commission on Human Rights, Sub-Commission on the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights, 28 June 2005, E\/CN.4\/Sub.2\/2005\/17, Annex);Parliamentary Assembly Opinions 221 (2000) and 222 (2000) and Committee of Ministers Resolutions Res (2000)13 and (2000)14;Parliamentary Assembly Opinion 222 (2000) on Azerbaijan\u2019s application for membership of the Council of Europe;Resolution Res (2000)14 by the Committee of Ministers concerning the invitation to Azerbaijan to become a member of the Council of Europe;Article 49 of Convention [No. IV] relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War of 12 August 1949;Rule 132 of the ICRC Study on Rules of customary international humanitarian law;Resolution 1708 (2010) on \u201cSolving property issues of refugees and displaced persons\u201d of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe", "conclusion": "Preliminary objection dismissed (Article 35-1 - Exhaustion of domestic remedies);Preliminary objection dismissed (Article 35-3 - Continuing situation);Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Article 34 - Victim);Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Positive obligations;Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions;Possessions);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Positive obligations;Article 8-1 - Respect for family life;Respect for home;Respect for private life);Violation of Article 13 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy);Just satisfaction reserved (Article 41 - Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Alvina Gyulumyan;Christos Rozakis;Corneliu B\u00eersan;Dean Spielmann;Egbert Myjer;Egidijus K\u016bris;Elisabet Fura;Fran\u00e7oise Tulkens;Ganna Yudkivska;George Nicolaou;Giorgio Malinverni;Guido Raimondi;Ineta Ziemele;Jean-Paul Costa;Josep Casadevall;Khanlar Hajiyev;Luis L\u00f3pez Guerra;Mark Villiger;Nicolas Bratza;Paulo Pinto De Albuquerque;Peer Lorenzen;Robert Spano;Sverre Erik Jebens;Ksenija Turkovi\u0107", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0616JUD004016706" }, "346": { "webcast_id": "4016706_05022014", "hearing_date": "2014-02-05 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Sargsyan v. Azerbaijan (no. 40167\/06) ", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "40167\/06", "case_id": "001-108386", "case_name": "SARGSYAN v. AZERBAIJAN", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-108386", "type": "DECISIONS", "typedescription": 8, "document_date": "", "collection": "CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECGRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 2, "court": "8", "issue": "", "represented_by": "GASPARYAN N. ; OHANYAN K.", "respondent": "AZE", "articles": "8;13;14;34;35;35-1;35-3;P1-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Al-Skeini and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 55721\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 131-132 and 138-139 , 7 July 2011 l;Belilos v. Switzerland, 29 April 1988, \u00a7 49, Series A no. 132;Blecic v. Croatia [GC], no. 59532\/00, \u00a7\u00a7 70 and 86, ECHR 2006-III;Chiragov and Others v. Armenia [GC], no. 13216\/05, 14 December 2011;Chrysostomos, Papachrysostomou and Loizidou v. Turkey, nos.15299\/89, 15300\/89 and 15318\/89, D. R. 68, p. 216, at p. 250;Cyprus v. Turkey [GC], no. 25781\/94, \u00a7\u00a7 104, 175 and 189, ECHR 2001-IV;Cyprus v. Turkey, no. 8007\/77, decision of 10 July 1978, D.R. 13, p. 85 at p. 154;Demades v. Turkey, no. 16219\/90, \u00a7\u00a7 14-17, 31 July 2003;Demopoulos and Others v. Turkey (dec.), nos. 46113\/99, 3843\/02, 13751\/02, 13466\/03, 10200\/04, 14163\/04, 19993\/04 and 21819\/04, ECHR 2010-..;Dogan and Others v. Turkey, nos. 8803-8811\/02, 8813\/02 and 8815-8819\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 111-114 and 139, ECHR 2004-VI;Eugenia Michaelidou Developments Ltd and Michael Tymvios v. Turkey, no. 16163\/90, \u00a7\u00a7 15-18, 31 July 2003;I\u00e7yer v. Turkey (dec.), no. 18888\/02, \u00a7 73, ECHR 2006-I;Ilascu and Others v. Moldova and Russia [GC] (dec.), no. 48787\/99, 4 July 2001;Ilascu and Others v. Moldova and Russia [GC], no. 48787\/99, \u00a7\u00a7 310-313, ECHR 2004-VII;Ilhan v. Turkey [GC], no. 22277\/93, \u00a7 52, ECHR 2000-VII;J.A. Pye (Oxford) Ltd and J.A. Pye (Oxford) Land Ltd v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 44302\/02, ECHR 2007-X;Loizidou v. Turkey (merits), 18 December 1996, \u00a7\u00a7 41-47 and 62-64, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-VI;Loizidou v. Turkey (preliminary objections), 23 March 1995, \u00a7 89, Series A no. 310;M.S.S. v. Belgium and Greece [GC], no. 30696\/09, \u00a7 251, 21 January 2011;Malhous v. the Czech Republic (dec.) [GC], no. 33071\/96, ECHR 2000-XII;Maltzan and Others v. Germany (dec.) [GC], nos. 71916\/01, 71917\/01 and 10260\/02, \u00a7 74, ECHR 2005-V;Moldovan and Others and Rostas and Others v. Romania (dec.), nos. 41138\/98 and 64320\/01, 13 March 2001;Papamichalopoulos and Others v. Greece, 24 June 1993, \u00a7\u00a7 39-46, Series A no. 260-B;Preussische Treuhand GmbH and Co. KG a.A. v. Poland (dec.), no. 47550\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 57-62, 7 October 2008;Prince Hans-Adam II of Liechtenstein v. Germany [GC], no. 42527\/98, \u00a7\u00a7 84-86, ECHR 2001-VIII;Varnava and Others v. Turkey [GC], nos. 16064-66\/90 and 16068-73\/90, \u00a7\u00a7 159, 161 and 170, ECHR 2009-...;Vasilescu v. Romania, 22 May 1998, \u00a7\u00a7 48-49, Reports 1998-III;Xenides-Arestis v. Turkey (dec.), no. 46347\/99, 14 March 2005;Xenides-Arestis v. Turkey, no. 46347\/99, \u00a7 28, 22 December 2005", "external_sources": "Articles 25 and 28 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties of 23 May 1969", "conclusion": "Admissible", "separate_opinion": "", "judges": "Alvina Gyulumyan;Christos Rozakis;Corneliu B\u00eersan;Egbert Myjer;Elisabet Fura;Fran\u00e7oise Tulkens;George Nicolaou;Giorgio Malinverni;Jean-Paul Costa;Josep Casadevall;Khanlar Hajiyev;Luis L\u00f3pez Guerra;Nicolas Bratza;Peer Lorenzen;Sverre Erik Jebens", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1214DEC004016706" }, "347": { "webcast_id": "1321605_22012014", "hearing_date": "2014-01-22 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Chiragov and Others v. Armenia (no. 13216\/05) ", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "13216\/05", "case_id": "001-179554", "case_name": "CASE OF CHIRAGOV AND OTHERS v. ARMENIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-179554", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 12, "document_date": "2017-12-12 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 2, "court": "8", "issue": "", "represented_by": "MULLER M. ; VINE C. ; BUTLER M. ; IVERS M. ; POYNOR B. ; SWAROOP S. ; YILDIZ K.", "respondent": "ARM", "articles": "8;8-1;13;35;35-3-a;41;P1-1;P1-1-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Akdivar and Others v. Turkey, 16 September 1996, \u00a7 65, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-IV;Ali\u0161i\u0107 and Others v. Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Serbia, Slovenia and the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia [GC], no. 60642\/08, ECHR 2014;Avc\u0131 and Others v. Turkey, no. 70417\/01, \u00a7 56, 27 June 2006;Centro Europa 7 S.r.l. and Di Stefano v. Italy [GC], no. 38433\/09, \u00a7 222, ECHR 2012;Cyprus v. Turkey (just satisfaction) [GC], no. 25781\/94, \u00a7 56, ECHR 2014;Demopoulos and Others v. Turkey (dec.) [GC], nos. 46113\/99 and 7 others, \u00a7 85, ECHR 2010;Do\u011fan and Others v. Turkey (just satisfaction), nos. 8803\/02 and 14 others, \u00a7 61, 13 July 2006;Ernestina Zullo v. Italy [GC], no. 64897\/01, \u00a7\u00a7 115-116 and 148-149, 29 March 2006;Je\u010dius v. Lithuania, no. 34578\/97, \u00a7 109, ECHR 2000-IX;Kova\u010di\u0107 and Others v. Slovenia [GC], nos. 44574\/98 and 2 others, \u00a7\u00a7 255-256, 3 October 2008 Demopoulos and Others v. Turkey (dec.) [GC], nos. 46113\/99 and 7 others, \u00a7 85, ECHR 2010;Kuri\u0107 and Others v. Slovenia (just satisfaction) [GC], no. 26828\/06, ECHR 2014;Loizidou v. Turkey (Article 50), 28 July 1998, Reports 1998 IV;Malhous v. the Czech Republic [GC], no. 33071\/96, 12 July 2001;Papamichalopoulos and Others v. Greece (Article 50), 31 October 1995, \u00a7 34, Series A no. 330-B;Solomonides v. Turkey (just satisfaction), no. 16161\/90, \u00a7\u00a7 42-43 and 47, 27 July 2010;Varnava and Others v. Turkey [GC], nos. 16064\/90 and 8 others, \u00a7 224, ECHR 2009;Verein gegen Tierfabriken Schweiz (VgT) v. Switzerland (no. 2) [GC], no. 32772\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 84-88, ECHR 2009", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "FALSE", "judges": "Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Armen Harutyunyan;Branko Lubarda;Egidijus K\u016bris;Ganna Yudkivska;Guido Raimondi;Iulia Motoc;Krzysztof Wojtyczek;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Luis L\u00f3pez Guerra;M\u0101rti\u0146\u0161 Mits;Neboj\u0161a Vu\u010dini\u0107;Paul Lemmens;Robert Spano;Ksenija Turkovi\u0107", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1212JUD001321605" }, "348": { "webcast_id": "1321605_22012014", "hearing_date": "2014-01-22 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Chiragov and Others v. Armenia (no. 13216\/05) ", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "13216\/05", "case_id": "001-155353", "case_name": "CASE OF CHIRAGOV AND OTHERS v. ARMENIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-155353", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 14, "document_date": "2015-06-16 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Articles 2.1 and 2.2 of the 1985 Instructions on Rules of Registration of Housing Facilities of the Azerbaijan SSR ; 1978 Constitution of the Azerbaijan SSR ; Articles 4, 25, 27 and 28 of the 1970 Land Code of the Azerbaijan SSR ; Article 10.3 of the 1983 Housing Code of the Azerbaijan SSR ; Article 32, section 1(8) of the 1992 Land Code of the Azerbaijan SSR", "represented_by": "MULLER M. ; VINE C. ; BUTLER M. ; IVERS M. ; POYNOR B. ; SWAROOP S. ; YILDIZ K.", "respondent": "ARM", "articles": "1;8;8-1;8-2;13;34;35;35-1;35-3;41;P1-1;P1-1-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Akdivar and Others v. Turkey, 16 September 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 IV;Al-Skeini and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 55721\/07, ECHR 2011;Catan and Others v. Moldova and Russia, [GC], nos. 43370\/04, 8252\/05 and 18454\/06, ECHR 2012 (extracts);Cyprus v. Turkey [GC], no 25781\/94, \u00a7 76, ECHR 2001-IV;Damayev v. Russia, no 36150\/04, \u00a7\u00a7 108-111, 29 May 2012;Demopoulos and Others v. Turkey (dec.) [GC], nos. 46113\/99, 3843\/02, 13751\/02, 13466\/03, 10200\/04, 14163\/04, 19993\/04 and 21819\/04, \u00a7 69, ECHR 2010;Do\u011fan and Others v. Turkey, nos. 8803-8811\/02, 8813\/02 and 8815-8819\/02, ECHR 2004 VI (extracts);El-Masri v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, [GC], no 39630\/09, \u00a7 163, ECHR 2012;Elsanova v. Russia (dec.), no 57952\/00, 15 November 2005;Ila\u015fcu and Others v. Moldova and Russia, [GC], no 48787\/99, ECHR 2004-VII;Kerimova and Others v. Russia, nos. 17170\/04, 20792\/04, 22448\/04, 23360\/04, 5681\/05 and 5684\/05, 3 May 2011;Loizidou v. Turkey, (merits), 18 December 1996, Reports 1996 VI;Lordos and Others v. Turkey, no 15973\/90, \u00a7 50, 2 November 2010;Niazi Kazali and Hakan Kazali v. Cyprus (dec.), no 49247\/08, \u00a7 132, 6 March 2012;\u00d6nery\u0131ld\u0131z v. Turkey, no 48939\/99, \u00a7 124, ECHR 2004-XII;Orphanides v. Turkey, no 36705\/97, \u00a7 39, 20 January 2009;Prokopovich v. Russia, no 58255\/00, \u00a7 37, ECHR 2004-XI;Saveriades v. Turkey, no 16160\/90, 22 September 2009;Solomonides v. Turkey, no 16161\/90, \u00a7 31, 20 January 2009;Xenides-Arestis v. Turkey, no 46347\/99, \u00a7 36, 22 December 2005", "external_sources": "Resolutions No. 822 of 30 April (S\/RES\/822 (1993)), No. 853 of 29 July (S\/RES\/853 (1993)), No. 874 of 14 October (S\/RES\/874 (1993)), No. 884 of 12 November (S\/RES\/884 (1993)) of the United Nations (UN) Security Council;Human Rights Watch (HRW) report (\u201cSeven Years of Conflict in Nagorno-Karabakh\u201d, December 1994);Agreement on Military Co-operation between the Governments of the Republic of Armenia and the Republic of Nagorno Karabakh;Resolution on \u201cThe Situation in the occupied territories of Azerbaijan\u201d (A\/RES\/62\/243) of the UN General Assembly adopted on 14 March 2008;European Parliament resolution of 18 April 2012 containing the European Parliament's recommendations to the Council, the Commission and the European External Action Service on the negotiations of the EU-Armenia Association Agreement (2011\/2315(INI));Resolution 1416 of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, adopted on 25 January 2005;Report \u201cNagorno-Karabakh: Viewing the Conflict from the Ground\u201d of the International Crisis Group (ICG) of 14 September 2005;Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua, judgment Nicaragua v. United States of America, Merits, Judgment, International Court of Justice, Reports 1986, p. 14, \u00a7 64;Resolution 1708 (2010) on \u201cSolving property issues of refugees and displaced persons\u201d of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe;Article 3 of the UN \u201cPrinciples on Housing and Property Restitution for Refugees and Displaced Persons\u201d (Commission on Human Rights, Sub-Commission on the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights, 28 June 2005, E\/CN.4\/Sub.2\/2005\/17, Annex, (\u201cPinheiro Principles\u201d)", "conclusion": "Preliminary objections dismissed (Article 35-1 - Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Article 35-3 - Ratione loci);Preliminary objections dismissed (Article 34 - Victim);Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Positive obligations;Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions;Possessions);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for family life;Respect for home;Respect for private life);Violation of Article 13 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy);Just satisfaction reserved (Article 41 - Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Alvina Gyulumyan;Christos Rozakis;Corneliu B\u00eersan;Dean Spielmann;Egbert Myjer;Egidijus K\u016bris;Elisabet Fura;Fran\u00e7oise Tulkens;Ganna Yudkivska;George Nicolaou;Giorgio Malinverni;Guido Raimondi;Ineta Ziemele;Jean-Paul Costa;Josep Casadevall;Khanlar Hajiyev;Luis L\u00f3pez Guerra;Mark Villiger;Nicolas Bratza;Paulo Pinto De Albuquerque;Peer Lorenzen;Robert Spano;Sverre Erik Jebens;Ksenija Turkovi\u0107", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0616JUD001321605" }, "349": { "webcast_id": "1321605_22012014", "hearing_date": "2014-01-22 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Chiragov and Others v. Armenia (no. 13216\/05) ", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "13216\/05", "case_id": "001-108383", "case_name": "CHIRAGOV AND OTHERS v. ARMENIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-108383", "type": "DECISIONS", "typedescription": 8, "document_date": "", "collection": "CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECGRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 2, "court": "8", "issue": "", "represented_by": "MULLER M. ; OTTY T. ; YILDIZ K.", "respondent": "ARM", "articles": "8;13;14;34;35;35-1;35-2;35-3;P1-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Al-Skeini and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 55721\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 131-132 and 138-139, 7 July 2011;Blecic v. Croatia [GC], no 59532\/00, \u00a7\u00a7 70 and 86, ECHR 2006-III;Chrysostomos, Papachrysostomou and Loizidou v. Turkey, nos. 15299\/89, 15300\/89 and 15318\/89, DR 68, p. 287;Cyprus v. Turkey, no. 8007\/77, \u00a7\u00a7 104, 174-175 and 184-186, decision of 10 July 1978, Decisions and Reports (DR) 13, p. 228;David v. Moldova, no. 41578\/05, \u00a7 28, 27 February 2008;Demades v. Turkey, no. 16219\/90, \u00a7\u00a7 14-17, 31 July 2003;Demopoulos and Others v. Turkey (dec.) [GC], nos. 46113\/99, 3843\/02, 13751\/02, 13466\/03, 10200\/04, 14163\/04, 19993\/04 and 21819\/04, ECHR\/ECHR 2010;Dogan and Others v. Turkey, nos. 8803-8811\/02, 8813\/02 and 8815-8819\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 111-114, ECHR 2004-VI;Eugenia Michaelidou Developments Ltd and Michael Tymvios v. Turkey, no. 16163\/90, \u00a7\u00a7 15-18, 31 July 2003;Folger\u00f8 and Others v. Norway (dec.), no. 15472\/02, 14 February 2006;Harutyunyan v. Armenia, no. 36549\/03, ECHR 2007-III;I\u00e7yer v. Turkey (dec.), no. 18888\/02, \u00a7 73, ECHR 2006-I;Ilascu and Others v. Moldova and Russia [GC], no. 48787\/99, ECHR 2004-VII;J.A. Pye (Oxford) Ltd and J.A. Pye (Oxford) Land Ltd v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 44302\/02, ECHR 2007-X;Loizidou v. Turkey [GC], no. 15318\/89, \u00a7\u00a7 41-47 and 62-63, ECHR 1996-VI;M.S.S. v. Belgium and Greece [GC], no. 30696\/09, \u00a7 251, 21 January 2011;Malhous v. the Czech Republic [GC] (dec.), no. 33071\/96, ECHR 2000-XII;Maltzan and Others v. Germany (dec.) [GC], nos. 71916\/01, 71917\/01 and 10260\/02, \u00a7 74, ECHR 2005-V;Moldovan and Others and Rostas and Others v. Romania (dec.), nos. 41138\/98 and 64320\/01, 13 March 2001;OAO Neftyanaya Kompaniya Yukos v. Russia, 14902\/04, \u00a7\u00a7 520-526, 20 September 2011;Papamichalopoulos and Others v. Greece, 24 June 1993, \u00a7\u00a7 39-46, Series A no. 260-B;Preussische Treuhand GmbH & Co. KG A.A. v. Poland (dec.), no. 47550\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 57-62, 7 October 2008;Prince Hans-Adam II of Liechtenstein v. Germany [GC], no. 42527\/98, \u00a7\u00a7 84-86, ECHR 2001-VIII;Varnava and Others v. Turkey [GC], nos. 16064\/90, 16065\/90, 16066\/90, 16068\/90, 16069\/90, 16070\/90, 16071\/90, 16072\/90 and 16073\/90, 18 September 2009;Varnava and Others v. Turkey, nos. 16064\/90, 16065\/90, 16066\/90, 16068\/90, 16069\/90, 16070\/90, 16071\/90, 16072\/90 and 16073\/90, decision of the Commission,14 April 1998, Decisions and Reports 93-B, pp. 5, 14;Vasilescu v. Romania, 22 May 1998, \u00a7\u00a7 48-49, Reports 1998-III;Xenides-Arestis v. Turkey (dec.), no. 46347\/99, 14 March 2005;Xenides-Arestis v. Turkey, no. 46347\/99, \u00a7 28, 22 December 2005;Zalyan, Sargsyan and Serobyan v. Armenia (d\u00e9c), nos. 36894\/04 and 3521\/07, 11 October 2007", "external_sources": "Articles 25 and 28 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties of 23 May 1969", "conclusion": "Admissible", "separate_opinion": "", "judges": "Alvina Gyulumyan;Christos Rozakis;Corneliu B\u00eersan;Egbert Myjer;Elisabet Fura;Fran\u00e7oise Tulkens;George Nicolaou;Giorgio Malinverni;Jean-Paul Costa;Josep Casadevall;Khanlar Hajiyev;Luis L\u00f3pez Guerra;Nicolas Bratza;Peer Lorenzen;Sverre Erik Jebens", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1214DEC001321605" }, "350": { "webcast_id": "2975009_11122013", "hearing_date": "2013-12-11 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Hassan v. the United Kingdom (no. 29750\/09) ", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "29750\/09", "case_id": "001-146501", "case_name": "CASE OF HASSAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-146501", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 14, "document_date": "2014-09-16 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "", "represented_by": "SHINER P. ; OTTY T. ; HICKMAN T.", "respondent": "GBR", "articles": "1;5;5-1;5-2;5-4;15;15-1;35", "strasbourg_caselaw": "A. and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 3455\/05, ECHR 2009;Aksoy v. Turkey, 18 December 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-VI;Al-Adsani v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 35763\/97, \u00a7 55, ECHR 2001 XI;Al-Jedda v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 27021\/08, ECHR 2011;Al-Saadoon and Mufdhi v. the United Kingdom, no. 61498\/08, \u00a7 120, ECHR 2010;Al-Skeini and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 55721\/07, ECHR 2011;Bankovi\u0107 and Others v. Belgium and Others (dec.) [GC], no. 52207\/99, \u00a7 62, ECHR 2001 XII;Brannigan and McBride v. the United Kingdom, 26 May 1993, Series A no. 258 B;El Masri v. \u201cthe former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia\u201d [GC], no. 39630\/09, \u00a7 151-230, ECHR 2012;Golder v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 21 February 1975, Series A no. 18, \u00a7 29;Guzzardi v. Italy, 6 November 1980, \u00a7 102, Series A no. 39;Ireland v. the United Kingdom, 18 January 1978, \u00a7 196, Series A no. 25;J\u0117\u010dius v. Lithuania, no. 34578\/97, \u00a7\u00a7 47-52, ECHR 2000-IX;Kurt v. Turkey, 25 May 1998, \u00a7 122, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 III;Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772\/95, \u00a7 131, ECHR 2000 IV;Lawless v. Ireland (no. 3), 1 July 1961, \u00a7\u00a7 13 and 14, Series A no. 3;McKerr v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 28883\/95, 4 April 2000;Members (97) of the Gldani Congregation of Jehovah\u2019s Witnesses v. Georgia, no. 71156\/01, \u00a7 97, 3 May 2007;Reinprecht v. Austria, no. 67175\/01, \u00a7 31, ECHR 2005 XII;Saadi v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 13229\/03, \u00a7\u00a7 67-74, ECHR 2008;Soering v. the United Kingdom, 7 July 1989, \u00a7\u00a7 102-103, Series A no. 161;Varnava and Others v. Turkey [GC], nos. 16064\/90, 16065\/90, 16066\/90, 16068\/90, 16069\/90, 16070\/90, 16071\/90, 16072\/90 and 16073\/90, \u00a7 185, ECHR 2009", "external_sources": "International Court of Justice, Advisory Opinion on The Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, para. 25;International Court of Justice, Advisory Opinion on The Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, para. 106;International Court of Justice, Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) v. Uganda), Judgment, paras. 215-216;Articles 4A and 21 of the Third Geneva Convention Relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War;Articles 42, 43 and 78 of the Fourth Geneva Convention relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War;Article 2 common to the four Geneva Conventions;Article 31 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties", "conclusion": "Remainder inadmissible;No violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Deprivation of liberty;Lawful arrest or detention);No violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-2 - Information on reasons for arrest);No violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Review of lawfulness of detention)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Dean Spielmann;George Nicolaou;Guido Raimondi;Ineta Ziemele;Isabelle Berro-Lef\u00e8vre;Josep Casadevall;Ledi Bianku;Luis L\u00f3pez Guerra;Mark Villiger;Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska;Paul Mahoney;Robert Spano;Vincent A. De Gaetano;Zdravka Kalaydjieva", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0916JUD002975009" }, "351": { "webcast_id": "2975009_11122013", "hearing_date": "2013-12-11 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Hassan v. the United Kingdom (no. 29750\/09) ", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "29750\/09", "case_id": "001-118182", "case_name": "HASSAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-118182", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "2011-08-30 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "PUBLIC INTEREST LAWYERS", "respondent": "GBR", "articles": "2;3;5", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "", "separate_opinion": "FALSE", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "352": { "webcast_id": "2876111_03122013", "hearing_date": "2013-12-03 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Al Nashiri v. Poland (no. 28761\/11) and Husayn (Abu Zubaydah) v. Poland (no. 7511\/13)", "hearing_type": "Chamber hearing", "appno": "28761\/11", "case_id": "001-146044", "case_name": "CASE OF AL NASHIRI v. POLAND", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-146044", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2014-07-24 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 2, "court": "7", "issue": "Ordinance of the Minister of Justice of 20 February 2012 on the handling of transcripts of questioning and other documents or items covered by the duty to maintain secrecy of classified information or the duty of secrecy related to the exercise of a profession or function ; Law of 22 January 1999 on protection of classified information ; Law of 5 August 2010 on protection of classified information ; Articles 10 \u00a7 1, 303 and 304 of the Code of Criminal Procedure", "represented_by": "GOLDSTON J.A. ; SKILBECK R. ; SINGH A. ; HOLLANDER N.", "respondent": "POL", "articles": "2;2+P6-1;2-1;3;3+P6-1;5;5-1;6;6-1;8;8-1;8-2;13;13+3;35;35-1;38;41;46;46-2;52;P6-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "A. and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 3455\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 216-218, ECHR 2009;A. v. the United Kingdom, 23 September 1998, \u00a7 22, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 VI;Aksoy v. Turkey, 18 December 1996, Reports 1996-VI;Al-Adsani v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 35763\/97, \u00a7\u00a7 26-31, ECHR 2001 XI;Al-Saadoon and Mufdhi v. the United Kingdom, no. 61498\/08, ECHR 2010;Al-Skeini and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 55721\/07, \u00a7 167;Anguelova v. Bulgaria, no. 38361\/97, ECHR 2002 IV;Aslakhanova and Others v. Russia, nos. 2944\/06, 8300\/07, 50184\/07, 332\/08 and 42509\/10, 18 December 2012;Assanidze v. Georgia [GC], no. 71503\/01, \u00a7\u00a7 198 and 202, ECHR 2004-II;Assenov and Others v. Bulgaria, 28 October 1998, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 VIII;Babar Ahmad and Others v. the United Kingdom, nos. 24027\/07, 11949\/08, 36742\/08, 66911\/09 and 67354\/09, \u00a7 168, 10 April 2012;\u00c7ak\u0131c\u0131 v. Turkey [GC], no. 23657\/94, \u00a7 85, ECHR 1999-IV;Chahal v. the United Kingdom, 15 November 1996, Reports 1996-V;Creang\u0103 v. Romania [GC], no. 29226\/03, \u00a7 88, 23 February 2012;Cyprus v. Turkey [GC], no. 25781\/94, \u00a7\u00a7 107-111, ECHR 2001 IV;Cyprus v. Turkey, no. 25781\/95, Commission\u2019s Report of 4 June 1999;Davydov and Others v. Ukraine, nos. 17674\/02 and 39081\/02, \u00a7 174, 1 July 2010;Dedovskiy and Others v. Russia, no. 7178\/03, \u00a7 107, ECHR 2008 (extracts);Egmez v. Cyprus, no. 30873\/96, \u00a7 78, ECHR 2000-XII;El-Masri v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia [GC], no. 39630\/09, ECHR 2012;Estamirov and Others v. Russia, no. 60272\/00, \u00a7\u00a7 72 and 80, 12 October 2006;Hirsi Jamaa and Others v. Italy [GC], no. 27765\/09, \u00a7 209, ECHR 201;Husayn (Abu Zubaydah) v. Poland, no. 7511\/13;Ila\u015fcu and Others v. Moldova and Russia [GC], no. 48787\/99, ECHR 2004 VII;\u0130lhan v. Turkey [GC], no. 22277\/93, \u00a7 85, ECHR 2000 VII;Imakayeva v. Russia, no. 7615\/02, \u00a7 200, ECHR 2006 XIII (extracts);Incal v. Turkey, 9 June 1998, \u00a7 68 et seq. Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 IV \u00d6calan, \u00a7 112;Ireland v. the United Kingdom, 18 January 1978, Series A no. 25;Ireland v. the United Kingdom, Commission\u2019s Report of 25 January 1976, \u00a7\u00a7 138 140, Series B no. 23-I;Jalloh v. Germany [GC], no. 54810\/00, ECHR 2006 IX;Janowiec and Others v. Russia [GC], nos. 55508\/07 and 29520\/09, ECHR 2013;Kaboulov v. Ukraine, no. 41015\/04, \u00a7 99, 19 November 2009;Kadirova and Others v. Russia, no. 5432\/07, 27 March 2012;Kaya v. Turkey, 19 February 1998, \u00a7 106, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 I;Krastanov v. Bulgaria, no. 50222\/99, \u00a7 53, 30 September 2004;Kud\u0142a v. Poland [GC], no. 30210\/96, \u00a7 92, ECHR 2000 XI;Kurt v Turkey, 25 May 1998, \u00a7\u00a7 123-124, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 III;Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772\/95, \u00a7 119, ECHR 2000 IV;Mahmut Kaya v. Turkey, no. 22535\/93, \u00a7 115, ECHR 2000 III;Mamatkulov and Askarov v. Turkey [GC], nos. 46827\/99 and 46951\/99, \u00a7\u00a7 90-91, ECHR 2005 I;Nachova and Others v. Bulgaria [GC], nos. 43577\/98 and 43579\/98, \u00a7 147, ECHR 2005 VII;Nevmerzhitsky v. Ukraine, no. 54825\/00, \u00a7 77, ECHR 2005-II (extracts);Nolan and K. v. Russia, no. 2512\/04, \u00a7 56, 12 February 2009;\u00d6calan v. Turkey [GC], no. 46221\/99, \u00a7 179 ECHR 2005 IV;Othman (Abu Qatada) v. the United Kingdom, no. 8139\/09, ECHR 2012 (extracts);Pretty v. the United Kingdom, no. 2346\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 61 and 65, ECHR 2002 III;Quinn v. France, 22 March 1995, \u00a7 42, Series A no. 311;Saadi v. Italy [GC], no. 37201\/06, \u00a7 125, ECHR 2008;Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986\/93, \u00a7 100, ECHR 2000-VII;Savriddin Dzhurayev v. Russia, no. 71386\/10, \u00a7\u00a7 252-254, ECHR 2013 (extracts);Sejdovic v. Italy [GC], no. 56581\/00, \u00a7 84, ECHR 2006 II;Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803\/94, \u00a7\u00a7 13-24, ECHR 1999 V;Shakhgiriyeva and Others v. Russia, no. 27251\/03, \u00a7\u00a7 136-140, 8 January 2009;Shamayev and Others v. Georgia and Russia, no. 36378\/02, ECHR 2005 III;Soering v. the United Kingdom, 7 July 1989, Series A no. 161;S\u00f6ylemez v. Turkey, no. 46661\/99, \u00a7 122, 21 September 2006;Tahsin Acar v. Turkey [GC], no. 26307\/95, \u00a7\u00a7 253-254, ECHR 2004 III;Tanr\u0131kulu v. Turkey [GC], no. 23763\/94, \u00a7 70, ECHR 1999 IV;Timurta\u015f v. Turkey, no. 23531\/94, \u00a7\u00a7 66 and 70, ECHR 2000 VI;Varnava and Others v. Turkey [GC], nos. 16064\/90, 16065\/90, 16066\/90, 16068\/90, 16069\/90, 16070\/90, 16071\/90, 16072\/90 and 16073\/90, \u00a7 184, ECHR 2009;Z and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 29392\/95, \u00a7 73, ECHR 2001 V", "external_sources": "2007 International Committee of the Red Cross Report;Statement of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights on detention of Taliban and Al-Qaeda prisoners at the US Base in Guant\u00e1namo Bay, Cuba, 16 January 2002;Amnesty International, Memorandum to the US Government on the rights of people in US custody in Afghanistan and Guant\u00e1namo Bay, April 2002;Human Rights Watch, \u201cUnited States, Presumption of Guilt: Human Rights Abuses of Post-September 11 Detainees\u201d, Vol. 14, No. 4 (G), August 2002;International Helsinki Federation for Human Rights, \u201cAnti terrorism Measures, Security and Human Rights: Developments in Europe, Central Asia and North America in the Aftermath of September 11\u201d, Report, April 2003;Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe Resolution no. 1340 (2003) on rights of persons held in the custody of the United States in Afghanistan or Guant\u00e1namo Bay, 26 June 2003;Parliamentary Assembly\u2019s inquiry \u2013 the Marty Inquiry;US Department of Justice Office of Professional Responsibility Report: \u201cInvestigation into the Office of Legal Counsel\u2019s Memoranda Concerning Issues Relating to the Central Agency\u2019s Use of \u2018Enhanced Interrogation Techniques\u2019 on Suspected Terrorists\u201d (\u201cthe 2009 DOJ Report\u201d);Resolution on the alleged use of European countries by the CIA for the transportation and illegal detention of prisoners (2006\/22009INI);Articles 26 and 27 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (23 May 1969);Statement of the International Rehabilitation Council for Torture;UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention, Opinion No. 29\/2006, Mr Ibn al-Shaykh al-Libi and 25 other persons v. United States of America, UN Doc. A\/HRC\/4\/40\/Add.1 at 103 (2006);Human Rights Watch, \u201cUnited States: Reports of Torture of Al Qaeda Suspects\u201d, 26 December 2002;Amnesty International Report 2003 \u2013 United States of America, 28 May 2003;Amnesty International, \u201cUnlawful detention of six men from Bosnia-Herzegovina in Guant\u00e1namo Bay\u201d, 29 May 2003;Amnesty International, \u201cUnited States of America, The threat of a bad example: Undermining international standards as \u2018war on terror\u2019 detentions continue\u201d, 18 August 2003;Amnesty International, \u201cIncommunicado detention\/Fear of ill treatment\u201d, 20 August 2003;International Committee of the Red Cross, United States: ICRC President urges progress on detention-related issues, news release 04\/03, 16 January 2004;Human Rights Watch - Statement on US Secret Detention Facilities of 6 November 2005;Human Rights Watch \u2013 List of Ghost Prisoners Possibly in CIA Custody of 30 November 2005;2010 UN Joint Study;2010 UN Human Rights Committee Observations;2006 and 2007 Marty Report;Parliamentary Assembly\u2019s inquiry \u2013 The Fava Inquiry;Center for Human Rights and Global Justice Report;Report prepared by John Helgerson, the CIA Inspector General, in 2004 (\u201cthe 2004 CIA Report\u201d);TDIP transcript of \u201cExchange of views with [M.P.], former director of Szczytno\/Szymany airport in Poland\u201d;Resolution on the alleged use of European countries by the CIA for the transportation and illegal detention of prisoners (2006\/22009INI);30 December 2004 CIA background paper on the CIA\u2019s combined interrogation techniques;Preamble to Protocol No. 13 to the European convention of human rights\n", "conclusion": "Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;Violation of Article 38 - Examination of the case-{general} (Article 38 - Obligation to furnish all necessary facilities);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Torture) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for family life;Respect for private life);Violation of Article 13+3 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 3 - Prohibition of torture;Effective investigation);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Access to court;Fair hearing);Violation of Article 2+P6-1 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Death penalty;Life) (Article 1 of Protocol No. 6 - Abolition of the death penalty;Abolition of the death penalty-{general});Violation of Article 3+P6-1 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Article 1 of Protocol No. 6 - Abolition of the death penalty;Abolition of the death penalty-{general});Respondent State to take individual measures (Article 46-2 - Individual measures);Non-pecuniary damage - award", "separate_opinion": "FALSE", "judges": "George Nicolaou;Ineta Ziemele;Krzysztof Wojtyczek;Ledi Bianku;P\u00e4ivi Hirvel\u00e4;Vincent A. De Gaetano;Zdravka Kalaydjieva", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0724JUD002876111" }, "353": { "webcast_id": "2876111_03122013", "hearing_date": "2013-12-03 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Al Nashiri v. Poland (no. 28761\/11) and Husayn (Abu Zubaydah) v. Poland (no. 7511\/13)", "hearing_type": "Chamber hearing", "appno": "28761\/11", "case_id": "001-112302", "case_name": "AL NASHIRI v. POLAND", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-112302", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "2012-07-10 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "GOLDSTON J.A. ; SKILBECK R. ; SINGH A. ; HOLLANDER N.", "respondent": "POL", "articles": "2;3;5;5-1;6;8;8-1;10;13;P6-1;P6-2", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Communicated", "separate_opinion": "FALSE", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "354": { "webcast_id": "2876111_03122013", "hearing_date": "2013-12-03 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Al Nashiri v. Poland (no. 28761\/11) and Husayn (Abu Zubaydah) v. Poland (no. 7511\/13)", "hearing_type": "Chamber hearing", "appno": "7511\/13", "case_id": "001-146047", "case_name": "CASE OF HUSAYN (ABU ZUBAYDAH) v. POLAND", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-146047", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2014-07-24 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 2, "court": "7", "issue": "Ordinance of the Minister of Justice of 20 February 2012 on the handling of transcripts of questioning and other documents or items covered by the duty to maintain secrecy of classified information or the duty of secrecy related to the exercise of a profession or function ; Law of 22 January 1999 on protection of classified information ; Law of 5 August 2010 on protection of classified information ; Articles 10 \u00a7 1, 303 and 304 of the Code of Criminal Procedure", "represented_by": "HUGHES P. ; DUFFY H. ; VANDOVA V. ; MARGULIES J. ; MICKUM G.B. ; JANKOWSKI B.", "respondent": "POL", "articles": "3;5;5-1;6;6-1;8;8-1;8-2;13;13+3;13+5;13+8;35;35-1;38;41;52", "strasbourg_caselaw": "A. and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 3455\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 216-218, ECHR 2009;A. v. the United Kingdom, 23 September 1998, \u00a7 22 Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 VI;Aksoy v. Turkey, 18 December 1996, \u00a7 64, Reports 1996-VI;Al Nashiri v. Poland, no. 28761\/11, \u00a7\u00a7 17-19;Al Adsani v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 35763\/97, \u00a7\u00a7 26-31, ECHR 2001 XI;Al-Saadoon and Mufdhi v. the United Kingdom, no. 61498\/08, \u00a7 149, ECHR 2010;Al-Skeini and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 55721\/07, \u00a7 167;Anguelova v. Bulgaria, no. 38361\/97, \u00a7 140, ECHR 2002 IV;Aslakhanova and Others v. Russia, nos. 2944\/06, 8300\/07, 50184\/07, 332\/08 and 42509\/10, 18 December 2012;Assenov and Others v. Bulgaria, 28 October 1998, \u00a7 102, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 VIII;Babar Ahmad and Others v. the United Kingdom, nos. 24027\/07, 11949\/08, 36742\/08, 66911\/09 and 67354\/09, \u00a7 168, 10 April 2012;\u00c7ak\u0131c\u0131 v. Turkey [GC], no. 23657\/94, \u00a7 85, ECHR 1999-IV;Chahal v. the United Kingdom, 15 November 1996, \u00a7 79, Reports 1996-V;Creang\u0103 v. Romania [GC], no. 29226\/03, \u00a7 88, 23 February 2012;Cyprus v. Turkey [GC], no. 25781\/94, \u00a7\u00a7 107-111, ECHR 2001 IV;Cyprus v. Turkey, no. 25781\/95, Commission\u2019s Report of 4 June 1999, \u00a7\u00a7 41-45 and 138;D.F. v. Latvia, no. 11160\/07, \u00a7 85, 29 October 2013;Davydov and Others v. Ukraine, nos. 17674\/02 and 39081\/02, \u00a7 174, 1 July 2010;Dedovskiy and Others v. Russia, no. 7178\/03, \u00a7 107, ECHR 2008 (extracts);Egmez v. Cyprus, no. 30873\/96, \u00a7 78, ECHR 2000-XII;El-Masri v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia [GC], no. 39630\/09, \u00a7 \u2026, ECHR 2012;Estamirov and Others v. Russia, no. 60272\/00, \u00a7\u00a7 72 and 80, 12 October 2006;Ila\u015fcu and Others v. Moldova and Russia [GC], no. 48787\/99, \u00a7\u00a7 188-211, ECHR 2004 VII;\u0130lhan v. Turkey [GC], no. 22277\/93, \u00a7 85, ECHR 2000 VII;Imakayeva v. Russia, no. 7615\/02, ECHR 2006 XIII (extracts);Incal v. Turkey, 9 June 1998, \u00a7 68 et seq., Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 IV;Ireland v. the United Kingdom, 18 January 1978, \u00a7 162, Series A no. 25;Ireland v. the United Kingdom, Commission\u2019s Report of 25 January 1976, \u00a7\u00a7 138 140, Series B no. 23-I;Jalloh v. Germany [GC], no. 54810\/00, ECHR 2006 IX;Janowiec and Others v. Russia [GC], nos. 55508\/07 and 29520\/09, ECHR 2013- ...;Kaboulov v. Ukraine, no. 41015\/04, \u00a7 99, 19 November 2009;Kadirova and Others v. Russia, no. 5432\/07, 27 March 2012;Kaya v. Turkey, 19 February 1998, \u00a7 106, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 I;Krastanov v. Bulgaria, no. 50222\/99, \u00a7 53, 30 September 2004;Kud\u0142a v. Poland [GC], no. 30210\/96, \u00a7 92, ECHR 2000 XI;Kurt v. Turkey, 25 May 1998, \u00a7\u00a7 123-124, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 III;Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772\/95, \u00a7 119, ECHR 2000 IV;Mahmut Kaya v. Turkey, no. 22535\/93, \u00a7 115, ECHR 2000 III;Mamatkulov and Askarov v. Turkey [GC], nos. 46827\/99 and 46951\/99, \u00a7\u00a7 90-91, ECHR 2005 I;Nachova and Others v. Bulgaria [GC], nos. 43577\/98 and 43579\/98, \u00a7 147, ECHR 2005 VII;Nevmerzhitsky v. Ukraine, no. 54825\/00, \u00a7 77, ECHR 2005-II (extracts);Nolan and K. v. Russia, no. 2512\/04, \u00a7 56, 12 February 2009;\u00d6calan v. Turkey [GC], no. 46221\/99, \u00a7 179, ECHR 2005 IV;Othman (Abu Qatada) v. the United Kingdom, no. 8139\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 233 and 285, ECHR 2012 (extracts);Pretty v. the United Kingdom, no. 2346\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 61 and 65, ECHR 2002 III;Quinn v. France, 22 March 1995, \u00a7 42, Series A no. 311;Saadi v. Italy [GC], no. 37201\/06, \u00a7 125, ECHR 2008;Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986\/93, \u00a7 100, ECHR 2000-VII;Sejdovic v. Italy [GC], no. 56581\/00, \u00a7 84, ECHR 2006 II;Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803\/94, \u00a7\u00a7 13-24, ECHR 1999 V;Shakhgiriyeva and Others v. Russia, no. 27251\/03, 8 January 2009;Shamayev and Others v. Georgia and Russia, no. 36378\/02, ECHR 2005 III;Soering v. the United Kingdom, 7 July 1989, \u00a7\u00a7 90-91 and 113, Series A no. 161;S\u00f6ylemez v. Turkey, no. 46661\/99, \u00a7 122, 21 September 2006;Tahsin Acar v. Turkey [GC], no. 26307\/95, \u00a7\u00a7 253-254, ECHR 2004 III;Tangiyeva v. Russia, no. 57935\/00, \u00a7\u00a7 73-77, 29 November 2007;Tanr\u0131kulu v. Turkey [GC], no. 23763\/94, \u00a7 70, ECHR 1999 IV;Timurta\u015f v. Turkey, no. 23531\/94, \u00a7\u00a7 66 and 70, ECHR 2000 VI;Utsayeva and Others v. Russia, no. 29133\/03, \u00a7\u00a7 149-153, 29 May 2008;Varnava and Others v. Turkey [GC], nos. 16064\/90, 16065\/90, 16066\/90, 16068\/90, 16069\/90, 16070\/90, 16071\/90, 16072\/90 and 16073\/90, \u00a7 184, ECHR 2009;Z and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 29392\/95, \u00a7 73, ECHR 2001 V;Zubayrayev v. Russia, no. 67797\/01, \u00a7\u00a7 74-77, 10 January 2008", "external_sources": "2007 International Committee of the Red Cross Report;Statement of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights on detention of Taliban and Al-Qaeda prisoners at the US Base in Guant\u00e1namo Bay, Cuba, 16 January 2002;Amnesty International, Memorandum to the US Government on the rights of people in US custody in Afghanistan and Guant\u00e1namo Bay, April 2002;Human Rights Watch, \u201cUnited States, Presumption of Guilt: Human Rights Abuses of Post-September 11 Detainees\u201d, Vol. 14, No. 4 (G), August 2002;International Helsinki Federation for Human Rights, \u201cAnti terrorism Measures, Security and Human Rights: Developments in Europe, Central Asia and North America in the Aftermath of September 11\u201d, Report, April 2003;Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe Resolution no. 1340 (2003) on rights of persons held in the custody of the United States in Afghanistan or Guant\u00e1namo Bay, 26 June 2003;Parliamentary Assembly\u2019s inquiry \u2013 the Marty Inquiry;US Department of Justice Office of Professional Responsibility Report: \u201cInvestigation into the Office of Legal Counsel\u2019s Memoranda Concerning Issues Relating to the Central Agency\u2019s Use of \u2018Enhanced Interrogation Techniques\u2019 on Suspected Terrorists\u201d (\u201cthe 2009 DOJ Report\u201d);Resolution on the alleged use of European countries by the CIA for the transportation and illegal detention of prisoners (2006\/22009INI);Articles 26 and 27 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (23 May 1969);Statement of the International Rehabilitation Council for Torture;UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention, Opinion No. 29\/2006, Mr Ibn al-Shaykh al-Libi and 25 other persons v. United States of America, UN Doc. A\/HRC\/4\/40\/Add.1 at 103 (2006);Human Rights Watch, \u201cUnited States: Reports of Torture of Al Qaeda Suspects\u201d, 26 December 2002;Amnesty International Report 2003 \u2013 United States of America, 28 May 2003;Amnesty International, \u201cUnlawful detention of six men from Bosnia-Herzegovina in Guant\u00e1namo Bay\u201d, 29 May 2003;Amnesty International, \u201cUnited States of America, The threat of a bad example: Undermining international standards as \u2018war on terror\u2019 detentions continue\u201d, 18 August 2003;Amnesty International, \u201cIncommunicado detention\/Fear of ill treatment\u201d, 20 August 2003;International Committee of the Red Cross, United States: ICRC President urges progress on detention-related issues, news release 04\/03, 16 January 2004;Human Rights Watch - Statement on US Secret Detention Facilities of 6 November 2005;Human Rights Watch \u2013 List of Ghost Prisoners Possibly in CIA Custody of 30 November 2005;2010 UN Joint Study;2010 UN Human Rights Committee Observations;2006 and 2007 Marty Report;Parliamentary Assembly\u2019s inquiry \u2013 The Fava Inquiry;Center for Human Rights and Global Justice Report;Report prepared by John Helgerson, the CIA Inspector General, in 2004 (\u201cthe 2004 CIA Report\u201d);TDIP transcript of \u201cExchange of views with [M.P.], former director of Szczytno\/Szymany airport in Poland\u201d;Resolution on the alleged use of European countries by the CIA for the transportation and illegal detention of prisoners (2006\/22009INI);30 December 2004 CIA background paper on the CIA\u2019s combined interrogation techniques;Preamble to Protocol No. 13 to the European convention of human rights", "conclusion": "Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Violation of Article 38 - Examination of the case-{general} (Article 38 - Obligation to furnish all necessary facilities);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Torture) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Deprivation of liberty;Lawful arrest or detention;Procedure prescribed by law);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for family life;Respect for private life);Violation of Article 13+3 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 3 - Prohibition of torture;Effective investigation);Violation of Article 13+5 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 5-1 - Deprivation of liberty;Article 5 - Right to liberty and security);Violation of Article 13+8 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 8-1 - Respect for family life;Respect for private life;Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Access to court;Fair hearing);Non-pecuniary damage - award", "separate_opinion": "FALSE", "judges": "George Nicolaou;Ineta Ziemele;Krzysztof Wojtyczek;Ledi Bianku;P\u00e4ivi Hirvel\u00e4;Vincent A. De Gaetano;Zdravka Kalaydjieva", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0724JUD000751113" }, "355": { "webcast_id": "2876111_03122013", "hearing_date": "2013-12-03 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Al Nashiri v. Poland (no. 28761\/11) and Husayn (Abu Zubaydah) v. Poland (no. 7511\/13)", "hearing_type": "Chamber hearing", "appno": "7511\/13", "case_id": "001-123768", "case_name": "HUSAYN (ABU ZUBAYDAH) v. POLAND", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-123768", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "2013-07-09 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "VEDERNIKOVA D. ; DUFFY H. ; VANDOVA V. ; MARGUILES J. ; JANKOWSKI B. ; MITCKUM G. B.", "respondent": "POL", "articles": "3;3+13;5;5+13;5-1-b;5-2;5-3;5-4;5-5;6;8;8+13;13", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "", "separate_opinion": "FALSE", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "356": { "webcast_id": "4383511_27112013", "hearing_date": "2013-11-27 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "S.A.S. v. France (no. 43835\/11)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "43835\/11", "case_id": "001-145466", "case_name": "CASE OF S.A.S. v. FRANCE", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-145466", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2014-07-01 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Articles 1, 2 and 3 of the Law of 11 October 2010 \u201cprohibiting the concealment of one\u2019s face in public places\u201d", "represented_by": "SHARMA S. ; RAMBY DE MELLO M. ; MUMAN T. ; SINGH JUSS S.", "respondent": "FRA", "articles": "8;8-1;8-2;9;9-1;9-2;14;14+8;14+9;34;35;35-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Ahmet Arslan and Others v. Turkey, no 41135\/98, 23 February 2010;Aktas v. France (dec.), no 43563\/08, 30 June 2009;Al-Nashif v. Bulgaria, no 50963\/99, \u00a7 89, 20 June 2002;Anibal Vieira & Filhos LDA and Maria Rosa Ferreira da Costa LDA v. Portugal (dec.), nos. 980\/12 and 18385\/12, 13 November 2012;Arrowsmith v. the United Kingdom, no 7050\/75, report of the Commission of 12 October 1978, DR 19;Bayatyan v. Armenia [GC], no 23459\/03, \u00a7 122, ECHR 2011;Burden v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 13378\/05, \u00a7 34, ECHR 2008;Buscarini and Others v. San Marino [GC], no 24645\/94, \u00a7 34, ECHR 1999-I;Cha\u2019are Shalom Ve Tsedek v. France [GC], no 27417\/95, ECHR 2000-VII;Chassagnou and Others v. France [GC], nos. 25088\/94, 28331\/95 and 28443\/95, ECHR 1999-III;D.H. and Others v. the Czech Republic [GC], no 57325\/00, \u00a7\u00a7 175 and 184-185, ECHR 2007-IV;Dahlab v. Switzerland, no 42393\/98, ECHR 2001-V;Deceuninck v. France (dec.), no 47447\/08, 13 December 2011;Dudgeon v. the United Kingdom, 22 October 1981, \u00a7 41, Series A no 45;El Morsli v. France (dec.), no 15585\/06, 4 March 2008;Eweida and Others v. the United Kingdom, nos. 48420\/10, 59842\/10, 51671\/10 and 36516\/10, ECHR 2013;Hadrabov\u00e1 and Others v. the Czech Republic (dec.), nos. 42165\/02 and 466\/03, 25 September 2007;Hasan and Chaush v. Bulgaria [GC], no 30985\/96, \u00a7 78, ECHR 2000-XI;Ireland v. the United Kingdom, 18 January 1978, \u00a7 162, Series A no 25;Ivanov v. Russia (dec.), no 35222\/04, 20 February 2007;Jian v. Romania (dec.), no 46640\/99, 30 March 2004;Johnston and Others v. Ireland, 18 December 1986, Series A no 112, \u00a7 42;Kala\u00e7 v. Turkey, 1 July 1997, \u00a7 27, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997 IV;Kara v. the United Kingdom, no 36528\/97, 22 October 1998;Kereshashvili v. Georgia (dec.), no 5667\/02, 2 May 2006;Kervanci v. France, no 31645\/04, 4 December 2008;Kokkinakis v. Greece, 25 May 1993, Series A no 260-A;Konstantin Markin v. Russia [GC], no 30078\/06, \u00a7 127, ECHR 2012 (extracts);K\u00f6se and Others v. Turkey (dec.), no 26625\/02, ECHR 2006-II;Kurtulmu\u015f v. Turkey (dec.), no 65500\/01, ECHR 2006-II;Leyla \u015eahin v. Turkey, no 44774\/98, 29 June 2004;M. v. the United Kingdom, no 13284\/87, 15 October 1987;Mann Singh v. France (dec.), no 24479\/07, 11 June 2007;Manoussakis and Others v. Greece, 26 September 1996, Reports 1996-IV;Marckx v. Belgium, 13 June 1979, Series A no 31, \u00a7 27;Maurice v. France [GC], no 11810\/03, \u00a7 117, ECHR 2005 IX;McFeeley and Others v. the United Kingdom, no 8317\/78, 15 May 1980, \u00a7 83, Decisions and Reports (DR) 20;Michaud v. France, no 12323\/11, ECHR 2012, \u00a7\u00a7 51-52;Miro\u013cubovs and Others v. Latvia, no 798\/05, 15 September 2009;Nolan and K. v. Russia, no 2512\/04, \u00a7 73, 12 February 2009;Norris v. Ireland, 26 October 1988, \u00a7\u00a7 30-34, Series A no 142;Norwood v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no 23131\/03, ECHR 2004 XI;Otto-Preminger-Institut v. Austria, 20 September 1994, \u00a7 50, Series A no 295-A;\u00d6zer v. Turkey (no 2), no 871\/08, \u00a7 36, 26 January 2010;Philis v. Greece, no 28970\/95, 17 October 1996;Phull v. France (dec.), no 35753\/03, ECHR 2005 I;Popa v. Romania (dec.), no 4233\/09, 18 June 2013, \u00a7\u00a7 32-33;Predescu v. Romania, no 21447\/03, \u00a7\u00a7 25-27, 2 December 2008;Ranjit Singh v. France (dec.), no 27561\/08, 30 June 2009;Refah Partisi (the Welfare Party) and Others v. Turkey [GC], nos. 41340\/98, 41342\/98, 41343\/98 and 41344\/98, ECHR 2003-II;\u0158eh\u00e1k v. the Czech Republic (dec.), no 67208\/01, 18 May 2004;Schuler-Zgraggen v. Switzerland, 24 June 1993, \u00a7 67, Series A no 263;Serif v. Greece, no 38178\/97, \u00a7 53, ECHR 1999-IX;Staatkundig Gereformeerde Partij v. the Netherlands (dec.), 10 July 2012;Sutter v. Switzerland, no 8209\/78 of 1 March 1979;Svyato-Mykhaylivska Parafiya v. Ukraine, no 77703\/01, \u00a7 132, 14 June 2007;United Communist Party of Turkey and Others v. Turkey, 30 January 1998, \u00a7 45, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 I;Varbanov v. Bulgaria, no 31365\/96, \u00a7 36, ECHR 2000 X;Wingrove v. the United Kingdom, 25 November 1996, \u00a7 58, Reports 1996-V;X and Others v. Austria [GC], no 19010\/07, \u00a7 94, ECHR 2013;X, Y and Z v. the United Kingdom, 22 April 1997, \u00a7 44, Reports 1997 II;Young, James and Webster v. the United Kingdom, 13 August 1981, \u00a7 63, Series A no 44", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Preliminary objection dismissed (Article 34 - Victim);Preliminary objections dismissed (Article 34 - Actio popularis);Preliminary objections dismissed (Article 35-1 - Exhaustion of domestic remedies);Remainder inadmissible;No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);No violation of Article 9 - Freedom of thought conscience and religion (Article 9-1 - Manifest religion or belief);No violation of Article 14+8 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life;Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life);No violation of Article 14+9 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article 9 - Freedom of thought conscience and religion;Article 9-1 - Manifest religion or belief)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Ale\u0161 Pejchal;Andr\u00e9 Potocki;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Dean Spielmann;Elisabeth Steiner;Erik M\u00f8se;Ganna Yudkivska;Guido Raimondi;Helena J\u00e4derblom;Ineta Ziemele;Josep Casadevall;Khanlar Hajiyev;Ledi Bianku;Mark Villiger;Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska;Paul Lemmens", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0701JUD004383511" }, "357": { "webcast_id": "1273810_13112013", "hearing_date": "2013-11-13 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Jeunesse v. the Netherlands (no.12738\/10) ", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "12738\/10", "case_id": "001-147117", "case_name": "CASE OF JEUNESSE v. THE NETHERLANDS", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-147117", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2014-10-03 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 2, "court": "8", "issue": "Aliens Act 1965 ; Aliens Act 2000 ; Article 3 of the Agreement between the Kingdom of the Netherlands and the Republic of Suriname concerning the assignment of nationality\n", "represented_by": "LATER G.", "respondent": "NLD", "articles": "8;8-1;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Abdulaziz, Cabales and Balkandali v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 28 May 1985, Series A no. 94, p. 94, \u00a7 68;Ahmut v. the Netherlands, 28 November 1996, \u00a7 63, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 VI;Ajayi and Others v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 27663\/95, 22 June 1999;Arvelo Aponte v. the Netherlands, no. 28770\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 57-58, 3 November 2011;B.V. v. Sweden (dec.), no. 57442\/11, 13 November 2012;Benamar v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 43786\/04, 5 April 2005;Boultif v. Switzerland, no. 54273\/00, ECHR 2001 IX;Butt v. Norway, no. 47017\/09, \u00a7 78, 4 December 2012;Chandra and Others v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 53102\/99, 13 May 2003;Darren Omoregie and Others v. Norway, no. 265\/07, \u00a7 64, 31 July 2008;Djokaba Lambi Longa v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 33917\/12, \u00a7 81, 9 October 2012;M. v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 25087\/06, 24 June 2008;Maslov v. Austria [GC], no. 1638\/03, ECHR 2008;Mitchell v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 40447\/98, 24 November 1998;Neulinger and Shuruk v. Switzerland [GC], no. 41615\/07, \u00a7 135, ECHR 2010;Nunez v. Norway, no. 55597\/09, \u00a7 66, 28 June 2011;Popov v. France, nos. 39472\/07 and 39474\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 139-140, 19 January 2012;Priya v. Denmark (dec.), no. 13594\/03, 6 July 2006;Rodrigues da Silva and Hoogkamer v. the Netherlands, no. 50435\/99, ECHR 2006-I;Savasci v. Germany (dec.), no. 45971\/08, 19 March 2013;Tuquabo-Tekle and Others v. the Netherlands, no. 60665\/00, \u00a7 44, 1 December 2005;Udeh v. Switzerland, no. 12020\/09, 16 April 2013;Ullens de Schooten and Rezabek v. Belgium, nos. 3989\/07 and 38353\/07, \u00a7 54, 20 September 2011;\u00dcner v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 46410\/99, ECHR 2006 XII;Useinov v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 61292\/00, 11 April 2006;X v. Latvia [GC], no. 27853\/09, \u00a7 96, ECHR 2013", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for family life);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed;Non-pecuniary damage - award", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Alvina Gyulumyan;Ann Power-Forde;Corneliu B\u00eersan;Dean Spielmann;Guido Raimondi;Ineta Ziemele;Isabelle Berro-Lef\u00e8vre;J\u00e1n \u0160ikuta;Johannes Silvis;Josep Casadevall;Krzysztof Wojtyczek;Luis L\u00f3pez Guerra;Mark Villiger;Nona Tsotsoria;Paul Mahoney;Vincent A. De Gaetano", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1003JUD001273810" }, "358": { "webcast_id": "1273810_13112013", "hearing_date": "2013-11-13 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Jeunesse v. the Netherlands (no.12738\/10) ", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "12738\/10", "case_id": "001-115788", "case_name": "JEUNESSE v. THE NETHERLANDS", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-115788", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "2012-12-04 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "LATER GERARDINA E.M.", "respondent": "NLD", "articles": "3;5;5-1;5-4;8;8-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "", "separate_opinion": "FALSE", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "359": { "webcast_id": "1273810_13112013", "hearing_date": "2013-11-13 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Jeunesse v. the Netherlands (no.12738\/10) ", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "12738\/10", "case_id": "001-115732", "case_name": "JEUNESSE v. THE NETHERLANDS", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-115732", "type": "DECISIONS", "typedescription": 8, "document_date": "", "collection": "CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "6", "issue": "", "represented_by": "LATER G.", "respondent": "NLD", "articles": "3;5;5-1-f;5-4;5-5;8;13;14;14+8;35;P4-3;P12-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Partly admissible;Partly inadmissible", "separate_opinion": "", "judges": "Alvina Gyulumyan;Corneliu B\u00eersan;J\u00e1n \u0160ikuta;Johannes Silvis;Josep Casadevall;Luis L\u00f3pez Guerra;Nona Tsotsoria", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1204DEC001273810" }, "360": { "webcast_id": "3735909_16102013", "hearing_date": "2013-10-16 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Hamalainen v. Finland (no. 37359\/09)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "37359\/09", "case_id": "001-145768", "case_name": "CASE OF H\u00c4M\u00c4L\u00c4INEN v. FINLAND", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-145768", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2014-07-16 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Section 2 of the Transsexuals (Confirmation of Gender) Act", "represented_by": "COJOCARIU C.", "respondent": "FIN", "articles": "8;8-1;12;14;14+12;14+8", "strasbourg_caselaw": "A, B and C v. Ireland [GC], no 25579\/05, \u00a7 245, ECHR 2010;Airey v. Ireland, 9 October 1979, \u00a7 33, Series A no 32;B. v. France, 25 March 1992, \u00a7 63, Series A no 232-C;Botta v. Italy, 24 February 1998, \u00a7 35, Reports 1998-I;Burden v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 13378\/05, \u00a7 60, ECHR 2008;Christine Goodwin v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 28957\/95, ECHR 2002-VI;Dickson v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 44362\/04, \u00a7 78, ECHR 2007 V;E.B. v. France [GC], no 43546\/02, \u00a7 47, 22 January 2008;Evans v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 6339\/05, \u00a7 77, ECHR 2007 I;Frett\u00e9 v. France, no 36515\/97, \u00a7 41, ECHR 2002 I;Gaskin v. the United Kingdom, 7 July 1989, \u00a7 42, Series A no 160;Glass v. the United Kingdom, no 61827\/00, \u00a7\u00a7 74-83, ECHR 2004 II;Grant v. the United Kingdom, no 32570\/03, \u00a7\u00a7 39-44, ECHR 2006 VII;Karner v. Austria, no 40016\/98, \u00a7 37, ECHR 2003 IX;Konstantin Markin v. Russia [GC], no 30078\/06, \u00a7 127, ECHR 2012;L. and V. v. Austria, nos. 39392\/98 and 39829\/98, \u00a7 45, ECHR 2003 I;L. v. Lithuania, no 27527\/03, ECHR 2007 IV;McGinley and Egan v. the United Kingdom, 9 June 1998, \u00a7 101, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 III;Nitecki v. Poland (dec.), no 65653\/01, 21 March 2002;Odi\u00e8vre v. France [GC], no 42326\/98, ECHR 2003 III;Pentiacova and Others v. Moldova (dec.), no 14462\/03, ECHR 2005 I;Petrovic v. Austria, 27 March 1998, \u00a7 38, Reports 1998 II;Pretty v. the United Kingdom, no 2346\/02, \u00a7 71, ECHR 2002 III;Rees v. the United Kingdom, 17 October 1986, \u00a7\u00a7 43-44, Series A no 106;Roche v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 32555\/96, \u00a7 162, ECHR 2005 X;S.H. and Others v. Austria [GC], no 57813\/00, \u00a7 94, ECHR 2011;Schalk and Kopf v. Austria, no 30141\/04, ECHR 2010;Sentges v. the Netherlands (dec.), no 27677\/02, 8 July 2003;Smith and Grady v. the United Kingdom, nos. 33985\/96 and 33986\/96, \u00a7 90, ECHR 1999 VI;S\u00f6derman v. Sweden [GC], no 5786\/08, \u00a7 78, ECHR 2013;Stec and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 65731\/01 and 65900\/01, \u00a7 52, ECHR 2006 VI;Vallianatos and Others v. Greece [GC], nos. 29381\/09 and 32684\/09, ECHR 2013;Van K\u00fcck v. Germany, no 35968\/97, ECHR 2003 VII;X and Others v. Austria [GC], no 19010\/07, \u00a7 99, ECHR 2013;X and Y v. the Netherlands, 26 March 1985, Series A no 91;X, Y and Z v. the United Kingdom, 22 April 1997, \u00a7 44, Reports 1997 II\n\n", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Positive obligations;Article 8-1 - Respect for family life;Respect for private life);No violation of Article 14+8 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article 8-1 - Respect for family life;Respect for private life;Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life);No violation of Article 14+12 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article 12 - Men and women;Right to marry)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Andr\u00e1s Saj\u00f3;Andr\u00e9 Potocki;Dean Spielmann;Erik M\u00f8se;George Nicolaou;Guido Raimondi;Helen Keller;Ineta Ziemele;Josep Casadevall;Khanlar Hajiyev;Lech Garlicki;Ledi Bianku;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Luzius Wildhaber;Mark Villiger;Neboj\u0161a Vu\u010dini\u0107;P\u00e4ivi Hirvel\u00e4;Paul Lemmens;Paul Martens;Vincent A. De Gaetano;Zdravka Kalaydjieva", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0716JUD003735909" }, "361": { "webcast_id": "3735909_16102013", "hearing_date": "2013-10-16 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Hamalainen v. Finland (no. 37359\/09)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "37359\/09", "case_id": "001-114486", "case_name": "CASE OF H. v. FINLAND", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-114486", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2012-11-13 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 3, "court": "7", "issue": "Section 2, subsection 1, of the Act on Confirmation of the Gender of a Transsexual", "represented_by": "UOTI K.", "respondent": "FIN", "articles": "8;8-1;8-2;12;14;14+8;35", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Burden v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 13378\/05, \u00a7 60, ECHR 2008;Christine Goodwin v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 28957\/95, ECHR 2002-VI;E.B. v. France [GC], no. 43546\/02, \u00a7 47, 22 January 2008;Grant v. the United Kingdom, no. 32570\/03, ECHR 2006-VII;Karner v. Austria, no. 40016\/98, ECHR 2003-IX;Keegan v. Ireland, 26 May 1994, \u00a7 49, Series A no. 290;L. and V. v. Austria, nos. 39392\/98 and 39829\/98, \u00a7 45, ECHR 2003-I;L. v. Lithuania, no. 27527\/03, ECHR 2007-IV;Parry v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 42971\/05, 28 November 2006;Petrovic v. Austria, 27 March 1998, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-II;Pretty v. the United Kingdom, no. 2346\/02, \u00a7 65, ECHR 2002-III;R. and F. v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 35748\/05, 28 November 2006;Rees v. the United Kingdom, 17 October 1986, \u00a7 49, Series A no. 106;Schalk and Kopf v. Austria, no. 30141\/04, ECHR 2010;Smith and Grady v. the United Kingdom, nos. 33985\/96 and 33986\/96, \u00a7 90, ECHR 1999-VI;Stec and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 65731\/01, \u00a7 52, ECHR 2006-VI;Van K\u00fcck v. Germany, no. 35968\/97, ECHR 2003-VII", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Remainder inadmissible;No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);No violation of Article 14+8 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life;Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life)", "separate_opinion": "FALSE", "judges": "George Nicolaou;Lech Garlicki;Ledi Bianku;Neboj\u0161a Vu\u010dini\u0107;P\u00e4ivi Hirvel\u00e4;Vincent A. De Gaetano;Zdravka Kalaydjieva", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1113JUD003735909" }, "362": { "webcast_id": "3735909_16102013", "hearing_date": "2013-10-16 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Hamalainen v. Finland (no. 37359\/09)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "37359\/09", "case_id": "001-114423", "case_name": "H. v. FINLAND", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-114423", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "2010-03-23 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "UOTI K.", "respondent": "FIN", "articles": "8;8-1;8-2;14", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Communicated", "separate_opinion": "FALSE", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "363": { "webcast_id": "904305_15102013", "hearing_date": "2013-10-15 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Natsvlishvili and Togonidze v. Georgia (no. 9043\/05)", "hearing_type": "Chamber hearing", "appno": "9043\/05", "case_id": "001-142672", "case_name": "CASE OF NATSVLISHVILI AND TOGONIDZE v. GEORGIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-142672", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2014-04-29 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "6", "issue": "Articles 679-3 \u00a7\u00a7 1, 3, 4, 5 and 6, 679-4 \u00a7 5 and 679-7 \u00a7 2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CCP)", "represented_by": "GIOSHVILI M. ; FILEEVA E. ; KOROTEEV K.", "respondent": "GEO", "articles": "6;6-1;6-2;34;P1-1;P1-1-1;P7-2", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Akdivar and Others v. Turkey, 16 September 1996, \u00a7 105, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 IV;Aksoy v. Turkey, 18 December 1996, \u00a7 105, Reports 1996-VI;Allenet de Ribemont v. France, 10 February 1995, \u00a7 35, Series A no. 308;Anguelov v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 45963\/99, 14 December 2004;Babar Ahmad and Others v. the United Kingdom (dec.), nos. 24027\/07, 11949\/08 and 36742\/08, ECHR 6 July 2010;Balenovi\u0107 v. Croatia (dec.), no. 28369\/07, 30 September 2010;Daktaras v. Lithuania, no. 42095\/98, ECHR 2000 X;Galstyan v. Armenia, no. 26986\/03, \u00a7 125, 15 November 2007;Hermi v. Italy [GC], no. 18114\/02, \u00a7 73, ECHR 2006 XII;Konstantin Markin v. Russia [GC], no. 30078\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 162-163, ECHR 2012 (extracts);Konstas v. Greece, no. 53466\/07, 24 May 2011;Krombach v. France, no. 29731\/96, \u00a7 96, ECHR 2001 II;Kurt v. Turkey, 25 May 1998, \u00a7 159, Reports 1998 III;Kuzmin v. Russia, no. 58939\/00, \u00a7\u00a7 51-63, 18 March 2010;Minelli v. Switzerland, 25 March 1983, \u00a7 37, Series A no. 62;Miro\u013cubovs and Others v. Latvia, no. 798\/05, \u00a7 68, 15 September 2009;Natsvlishvili and Togonidze v. Georgia (dec.), no. 9043\/05, \u00a7 84, 25 June 2013;Ninn-Hansen v. Denmark (dec.), no. 28972\/95, ECHR 1999 V;Poitrimol v. France, 23 November 1993, \u00a7 31, Series A no. 277-A;Ruci\u0144ski v. Poland, no. 33198\/04, \u00a7 12, 20 February 2007;Scoppola v. Italy (no. 2) [GC], no. 10249\/03, \u00a7 135, 17 September 2009;Shuvalov v. Estonia, no. 39820\/08 and 14942\/09, \u00a7 82, 29 May 2012;Slavcho Kostov v. Bulgaria, no. 28674\/03, \u00a7 17, 27 November 2008", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing);No violation of Article 2 of Protocol No. 7 - Right of appeal in criminal matters (Article 2 of Protocol No. 7 - Higher tribunal;Review of conviction;Review of sentence);No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6-2 - Presumption of innocence);No violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Deprivation of property);No violation of Article 34 - Individual applications (Article 34 - Hinder the exercise of the right of petition)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Alvina Gyulumyan;Corneliu B\u00eersan;J\u00e1n \u0160ikuta;Johannes Silvis;Josep Casadevall;Kristina Pardalos;Nona Tsotsoria", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0429JUD000904305" }, "364": { "webcast_id": "904305_15102013", "hearing_date": "2013-10-15 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Natsvlishvili and Togonidze v. Georgia (no. 9043\/05)", "hearing_type": "Chamber hearing", "appno": "9043\/05", "case_id": "001-122692", "case_name": "NATSVLISHVILI AND TOGONIDZE v. GEORGIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-122692", "type": "DECISIONS", "typedescription": 8, "document_date": "", "collection": "CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "6", "issue": "", "represented_by": "GIOSHVILI M. ; KOBAKHIDZE M.", "respondent": "GEO", "articles": "3;5;5-1;5-3;5-4;6;6-1;6-2;6-3-a;6-3-b;13;34;35;P1-1;P7-2", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Partly admissible;Partly inadmissible", "separate_opinion": "", "judges": "Alvina Gyulumyan;Corneliu B\u00eersan;J\u00e1n \u0160ikuta;Johannes Silvis;Josep Casadevall;Kristina Pardalos;Nona Tsotsoria", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0625DEC000904305" }, "365": { "webcast_id": "1086509_02102013", "hearing_date": "2013-10-02 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Mocanu and Others v. Romania (nos 10865\/09, 45886\/07 and 32431\/08) ", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "10865\/09", "case_id": "001-146540", "case_name": "CASE OF MOCANU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-146540", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2014-09-17 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "", "represented_by": "POPESCU A. ; SFIRAIALA I. ; MATEI I. ; NACEA D. ; HARTNEANU D.O.", "respondent": "ROU", "articles": "2;2-1;3;6;6-1;35;35-1;35-3;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Abd\u00fclsamet Yaman v. Turkey, no 32446\/96, \u00a7 55, 2 November 2004;Agache and Others v. Romania, no 2712\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 70-73, 20 October 2009;Ahmet \u00d6zkan and Others v. Turkey, no 21689\/93, \u00a7\u00a7 310 and 358, 6 April 2004;Akdivar and Others v. Turkey, 16 September 1996, Reports 1996 IV;Akhvlediani and Others v. Georgia (dec.), no 22026\/10, \u00a7\u00a7 23-29, 9 April 2013;Al-Skeini and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 55721\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 162-167, ECHR 2011;Assenov and Others v. Bulgaria, 28 October 1998, \u00a7 102, Reports 1998 VIII;Association \u00ab 21 Decembre 1989 \u00bb and Others v. Romania, nos. 33810\/07 and 18817\/08, 24 May 2011;Atallah v. France (dec.), no 51987\/07, 30 August 2011;Aydinlar and Others v. Turkey (dec.), no 3575\/05, 9 March 2010;Balogh v. Hungary, no 47940\/99, \u00a7 30, 20 July 2004;Barbu Anghelescu v. Romania, no 46430\/99, \u00a7 67, 5 October 2004;Bayram and Y\u0131ld\u0131r\u0131m v. Turkey (dec.), no 38587\/97, ECHR 2002-III;Ble\u010di\u0107 v. Croatia [GC], no 59532\/00, \u00a7 67, ECHR 2006 III;Brecknell v. the United Kingdom, no 32457\/04, \u00a7 71, 27 November 2007;Bulut and Yavuz (dec.), no 76065\/01, 28 May 2002;Bursuc v. Romania, no 42066\/98, \u00a7 107, 12 October 2004;\u00c7amdereli v. Turkey, no 28433\/02, \u00a7 38, 17 July 2008;Chiragov and Others v. Armenia (dec.) [GC], no 13216\/05, \u00a7 136, 14 December 2011;Cr\u0103iniceanu and Frumu\u015fanu v. Romania, no 12442\/04, \u00a7 92, 24 April 2012;Demopoulos and Others v. Turkey (dec.) [GC], nos. 46113\/99 and Others, \u00a7 69, ECHR 2010;Dennis and Others v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no 76573\/01, 2 July 2002;El-Masri v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia [GC], no. 39630\/09, ECHR 2012;Er and Others v. Turkey, no 23016\/04, \u00a7 52, 31 July 2012;Frandes v. Romania (dec.), no. 35802\/05, 17 May 2011;Frydlender v. France [GC], no 30979\/96, \u00a7 46, ECHR 2000 VII;G\u00e4fgen v. Germany [GC], no 22978\/05, \u00a7 117, ECHR 2010;Gheorghe and Maria Mihaela Dumitrescu v. Romania, no 6373, \u00a7\u00a7 26-28, 29 July 2008;G\u00fcrtekin and Others v. Cyprus (dec.), nos. 60441\/13, 68206\/13 and 68667\/13, 11 March 2014;Gusar v. Moldova (dec.), no 37204\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 14-17, 30 April 2013;Halat v. Turkey, no 23607\/08, \u00a7 51, 8 November 2011;Haralambie v. Romania, no 21737\/03, \u00a7 70, 27 October 2009;Isayeva and Others v. Russia, nos. 57947\/00, 57948\/00 and 57949\/00, \u00a7 149, 24 February 2005;Janowiec and Others v. Russia [GC], nos. 55508\/07 and 29520\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 128-151, 21 October 2013;Julari\u0107 v. Croatia, no 20106\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 45-51, 20 January 2011;Kuri\u0107 and Others v. Slovenia [GC], no 26828\/06, \u00a7 286, ECHR 2012 (extracts);L\u0103pu\u015fan and Others v. Romania, nos. 29007\/06, 30552\/06, 31323\/06, 31920\/06, 34485\/06, 38960\/06, 38996\/06, 39027\/06 and 39067\/06, 8 March 2011;M.B. v. Romania, no 43982\/06, \u00a7 64, 3 November 2011;M.C. v. Bulgaria, no 39272\/98, \u00a7 150, ECHR 2003 XII;McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, 27 September 1995, \u00a7 161, Series A no 324;McFarlane v. Ireland [GC], no 31333\/06, \u00a7 107, 10 September 2010;McKerr v. the United Kingdom, no 28883\/95, \u00a7\u00a7 114-115, ECHR 2001-III;Micu v. Romania, no 29883\/06, \u00a7 108, 8 February 2011;Nachova and Others v. Bulgaria [GC], nos. 43577\/98 and 43579\/98, \u00a7\u00a7 110 and 112-113, ECHR 2005-VII;Narin v. Turkey, no 18907\/02, \u00a7 51, 15 December 2009;Nasirkhayeva v. Russia (dec.), no 1721\/07, 31 May 2011;Pa\u00e7ac\u0131 and Others v. Turkey, no 3064\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 63-66, 8 November 2011;Pali\u0107 v. Bosnia and Herzegovina, no 4704\/04, \u00a7 52, 15 February 2011;Pastor and \u0162iclete v. Romania, nos. 30911\/06 and 40967\/06, \u00a7 58, 19 April 2011;Paul and Audrey Edwards v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no 46477\/99, 4 June 2001;Ramsahai and Others v. the Netherlands [GC], no 52391\/99, \u00a7\u00a7 324-325, ECHR 2007 II;Ringeisen v. Austria, 16 July 1971, \u00a7 89, Series A no 13;R\u00f6man v. Finland, no 13072\/05, \u00a7 50, 29 January 2013;Sabri G\u00fcne\u015f v. Turkey [GC], no 27396\/06, \u00a7 39, 29 June 2012;\u015eandru and Others v. Romania, no 22465\/03, \u00a7\u00a7 55 59, 8 December 2009;Sargsyan v. Azerbaijan (dec.) [GC], no 40167\/06, \u00a7 135, 14 December 2011;Scoppola v. Italy (no 2) [GC], no 10249\/03, \u00a7 70, 17 September 2009;Sejdovic v. Italy [GC], no 56581\/00, \u00a7 46, ECHR 2006 II;\u0160ilih v. Slovenia [GC], no 71463\/01, \u00a7\u00a7 159-163, 9 April 2009;Soering v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 7 July 1989, Series A no 161, p. 34, \u00a7 88;Varnava and Others v. Turkey [GC], nos. 16064\/90, 16065\/90, 16066\/90, 16068\/90, 16069\/90, 16070\/90, 16071\/90, 16072\/90 and 16073\/90, ECHR 2009;Velev v. Bulgaria, no 43531\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 59-60, 16 April 2013;Vu\u010dkovi\u0107 and Others v. Serbia [GC], nos. 17153\/11 and Others, 25 March 2014;Walker v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no 34979\/97, ECHR 2000 I;Ya\u015fa v. Turkey, 2 September 1998, \u00a7 74, Reports 1998 VI;Yeter v. Turkey, no 33750\/03, \u00a7 70, 13 January 2009;Yeti\u015fen and Others v. Turkey, no 21099\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 72-85, 10 July 2012", "external_sources": "General Comment No. 3 (2012) issued by the United Nations Committee against Torture on the Implementation by States parties of Article 14 of the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment", "conclusion": "Preliminary objections dismissed (Article 35-1 - Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Six month period;Article 35-3 - Continuing situation);Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Reasonable time);Non-pecuniary damage - award;Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Ale\u0161 Pejchal;Alvina Gyulumyan;Ann Power-Forde;Corneliu B\u00eersan;Dean Spielmann;Egbert Myjer;Florin Streteanu;Guido Raimondi;Ineta Ziemele;J\u00e1n \u0160ikuta;Johannes Silvis;Josep Casadevall;Krzysztof Wojtyczek;Ledi Bianku;Luis L\u00f3pez Guerra;Mark Villiger;Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska;Neboj\u0161a Vu\u010dini\u0107;Nona Tsotsoria;Paul Lemmens;Paulo Pinto De Albuquerque;Peer Lorenzen", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0917JUD001086509" }, "366": { "webcast_id": "1086509_02102013", "hearing_date": "2013-10-02 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Mocanu and Others v. Romania (nos 10865\/09, 45886\/07 and 32431\/08) ", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "10865\/09", "case_id": "001-114752", "case_name": "CASE OF MOCANU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-114752", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2012-11-13 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 3, "court": "6", "issue": "", "represented_by": "MATEI I. ; POPESCU A. ; SFIRAIALA I.; NACEA D.", "respondent": "ROU", "articles": "2;2-1;3;6;6-1;35;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Association 21 December 1989 and Others v. Romania, nos. 33810\/07 and 18817\/08, 24 May 2011;C.G. and Others v. Bulgaria (dec.), no 1365\/07, 13 March 2007;Chirita v. Romania (dec.), no 37147\/02, 6 September 2007;Delgado v. France, no 38437\/97, Commission decision of 9 September 1998;Dzieciak v. Poland, no 77766\/01, \u00a7 80, 9 December 2008;Erdogan Yagiz, no 27473\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 43-44, 6 March 2007;Folger\u00f8 and Others v. Norway (dec.), no 15472\/02, 14 February 2006;Frandes v. Romania (dec.), no 35802\/05, 17 May 2011;Frydlender v. France [GC], no 30979\/96, ECHR 2000-VII;G\u00e4fgen v. Germany [GC], no 22978\/05, \u00a7 92, ECHR 2010-...;G\u00fcle\u00e7 v. Turkey, 27 July 1998, \u00a7\u00a7 77-78, Reports 1998-IV;Isayeva and Others v. Russia, nos. 57947\/00, 57948\/00 and 57949\/00, \u00a7\u00a7 208-213, 24 February 2005;Labita v. Italy [GC], no 26772\/95, ECHR 2000-IV;Lapusan and Others v. Romania, nos. 29007\/06, 30552\/06, 31323\/06, 31920\/06, 34485\/06, 38960\/06, 38996\/06, 39027\/06 and 39067\/06, \u00a7 61, 8 March 2011;McKerr v. the United Kingdom, no 28883\/95, \u00a7 115, ECHR 2001-III;Melinte v. Romania, no 43247\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 33-36, 9 November 2006;Rupa v. Romania (no 1), no 58478\/00, \u00a7 90, 16 December 2008;Saileanu v. Romania, no 46268\/06, \u00a7 50, 2 February 2010;Sandru and Others v. Romania, no 22465\/03, 8 December 2009;Sel\u00e7uk and Asker v. Turkey, 24 April 1998, \u00a7 68, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-II;Selmouni v. France [GC], no 25803\/94, ECHR 1999-V;Sfrijan v. Romania, no 20366\/04, \u00a7\u00a7 44-48, 22 November 2007;\u0160ilih v. Slovenia, [GC], no 71463\/01, \u00a7\u00a7 159-163, 9 April 2009;Smirnova and Smirnova v. Russia (dec.), nos. 46133\/99 and 48183\/99, 3 October 2002;Streletz, Kessler and Krenz v. Germany [GC], nos. 34044\/96, 35532\/97 and 44801\/98, \u00a7\u00a7 80-81, ECHR 2001-II;Verein gegen Tierfabriken Schweiz (VgT) v. Switzerland (no 2) [GC], no 32772\/02, \u00a7 63, ECHR 2009-...;Yasa v. Turkey, 2 September 1998, \u00a7 74, Reports 1998-VI", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Reasonable time);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed;Non-pecuniary damage - award", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Alvina Gyulumyan;Corneliu B\u00eersan;Egbert Myjer;Florin Streteanu;Ineta Ziemele;J\u00e1n \u0160ikuta;Josep Casadevall;Luis L\u00f3pez Guerra", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1113JUD001086509" }, "367": { "webcast_id": "1086509_02102013", "hearing_date": "2013-10-02 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Mocanu and Others v. Romania (nos 10865\/09, 45886\/07 and 32431\/08) ", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "45886\/07", "case_id": "001-146540", "case_name": "CASE OF MOCANU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-146540", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2014-09-17 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "", "represented_by": "POPESCU A. ; SFIRAIALA I. ; MATEI I. ; NACEA D. ; HARTNEANU D.O.", "respondent": "ROU", "articles": "2;2-1;3;6;6-1;35;35-1;35-3;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Abd\u00fclsamet Yaman v. Turkey, no 32446\/96, \u00a7 55, 2 November 2004;Agache and Others v. Romania, no 2712\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 70-73, 20 October 2009;Ahmet \u00d6zkan and Others v. Turkey, no 21689\/93, \u00a7\u00a7 310 and 358, 6 April 2004;Akdivar and Others v. Turkey, 16 September 1996, Reports 1996 IV;Akhvlediani and Others v. Georgia (dec.), no 22026\/10, \u00a7\u00a7 23-29, 9 April 2013;Al-Skeini and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 55721\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 162-167, ECHR 2011;Assenov and Others v. Bulgaria, 28 October 1998, \u00a7 102, Reports 1998 VIII;Association \u00ab 21 Decembre 1989 \u00bb and Others v. Romania, nos. 33810\/07 and 18817\/08, 24 May 2011;Atallah v. France (dec.), no 51987\/07, 30 August 2011;Aydinlar and Others v. Turkey (dec.), no 3575\/05, 9 March 2010;Balogh v. Hungary, no 47940\/99, \u00a7 30, 20 July 2004;Barbu Anghelescu v. Romania, no 46430\/99, \u00a7 67, 5 October 2004;Bayram and Y\u0131ld\u0131r\u0131m v. Turkey (dec.), no 38587\/97, ECHR 2002-III;Ble\u010di\u0107 v. Croatia [GC], no 59532\/00, \u00a7 67, ECHR 2006 III;Brecknell v. the United Kingdom, no 32457\/04, \u00a7 71, 27 November 2007;Bulut and Yavuz (dec.), no 76065\/01, 28 May 2002;Bursuc v. Romania, no 42066\/98, \u00a7 107, 12 October 2004;\u00c7amdereli v. Turkey, no 28433\/02, \u00a7 38, 17 July 2008;Chiragov and Others v. Armenia (dec.) [GC], no 13216\/05, \u00a7 136, 14 December 2011;Cr\u0103iniceanu and Frumu\u015fanu v. Romania, no 12442\/04, \u00a7 92, 24 April 2012;Demopoulos and Others v. Turkey (dec.) [GC], nos. 46113\/99 and Others, \u00a7 69, ECHR 2010;Dennis and Others v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no 76573\/01, 2 July 2002;El-Masri v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia [GC], no. 39630\/09, ECHR 2012;Er and Others v. Turkey, no 23016\/04, \u00a7 52, 31 July 2012;Frandes v. Romania (dec.), no. 35802\/05, 17 May 2011;Frydlender v. France [GC], no 30979\/96, \u00a7 46, ECHR 2000 VII;G\u00e4fgen v. Germany [GC], no 22978\/05, \u00a7 117, ECHR 2010;Gheorghe and Maria Mihaela Dumitrescu v. Romania, no 6373, \u00a7\u00a7 26-28, 29 July 2008;G\u00fcrtekin and Others v. Cyprus (dec.), nos. 60441\/13, 68206\/13 and 68667\/13, 11 March 2014;Gusar v. Moldova (dec.), no 37204\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 14-17, 30 April 2013;Halat v. Turkey, no 23607\/08, \u00a7 51, 8 November 2011;Haralambie v. Romania, no 21737\/03, \u00a7 70, 27 October 2009;Isayeva and Others v. Russia, nos. 57947\/00, 57948\/00 and 57949\/00, \u00a7 149, 24 February 2005;Janowiec and Others v. Russia [GC], nos. 55508\/07 and 29520\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 128-151, 21 October 2013;Julari\u0107 v. Croatia, no 20106\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 45-51, 20 January 2011;Kuri\u0107 and Others v. Slovenia [GC], no 26828\/06, \u00a7 286, ECHR 2012 (extracts);L\u0103pu\u015fan and Others v. Romania, nos. 29007\/06, 30552\/06, 31323\/06, 31920\/06, 34485\/06, 38960\/06, 38996\/06, 39027\/06 and 39067\/06, 8 March 2011;M.B. v. Romania, no 43982\/06, \u00a7 64, 3 November 2011;M.C. v. Bulgaria, no 39272\/98, \u00a7 150, ECHR 2003 XII;McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, 27 September 1995, \u00a7 161, Series A no 324;McFarlane v. Ireland [GC], no 31333\/06, \u00a7 107, 10 September 2010;McKerr v. the United Kingdom, no 28883\/95, \u00a7\u00a7 114-115, ECHR 2001-III;Micu v. Romania, no 29883\/06, \u00a7 108, 8 February 2011;Nachova and Others v. Bulgaria [GC], nos. 43577\/98 and 43579\/98, \u00a7\u00a7 110 and 112-113, ECHR 2005-VII;Narin v. Turkey, no 18907\/02, \u00a7 51, 15 December 2009;Nasirkhayeva v. Russia (dec.), no 1721\/07, 31 May 2011;Pa\u00e7ac\u0131 and Others v. Turkey, no 3064\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 63-66, 8 November 2011;Pali\u0107 v. Bosnia and Herzegovina, no 4704\/04, \u00a7 52, 15 February 2011;Pastor and \u0162iclete v. Romania, nos. 30911\/06 and 40967\/06, \u00a7 58, 19 April 2011;Paul and Audrey Edwards v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no 46477\/99, 4 June 2001;Ramsahai and Others v. the Netherlands [GC], no 52391\/99, \u00a7\u00a7 324-325, ECHR 2007 II;Ringeisen v. Austria, 16 July 1971, \u00a7 89, Series A no 13;R\u00f6man v. Finland, no 13072\/05, \u00a7 50, 29 January 2013;Sabri G\u00fcne\u015f v. Turkey [GC], no 27396\/06, \u00a7 39, 29 June 2012;\u015eandru and Others v. Romania, no 22465\/03, \u00a7\u00a7 55 59, 8 December 2009;Sargsyan v. Azerbaijan (dec.) [GC], no 40167\/06, \u00a7 135, 14 December 2011;Scoppola v. Italy (no 2) [GC], no 10249\/03, \u00a7 70, 17 September 2009;Sejdovic v. Italy [GC], no 56581\/00, \u00a7 46, ECHR 2006 II;\u0160ilih v. Slovenia [GC], no 71463\/01, \u00a7\u00a7 159-163, 9 April 2009;Soering v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 7 July 1989, Series A no 161, p. 34, \u00a7 88;Varnava and Others v. Turkey [GC], nos. 16064\/90, 16065\/90, 16066\/90, 16068\/90, 16069\/90, 16070\/90, 16071\/90, 16072\/90 and 16073\/90, ECHR 2009;Velev v. Bulgaria, no 43531\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 59-60, 16 April 2013;Vu\u010dkovi\u0107 and Others v. Serbia [GC], nos. 17153\/11 and Others, 25 March 2014;Walker v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no 34979\/97, ECHR 2000 I;Ya\u015fa v. Turkey, 2 September 1998, \u00a7 74, Reports 1998 VI;Yeter v. Turkey, no 33750\/03, \u00a7 70, 13 January 2009;Yeti\u015fen and Others v. Turkey, no 21099\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 72-85, 10 July 2012", "external_sources": "General Comment No. 3 (2012) issued by the United Nations Committee against Torture on the Implementation by States parties of Article 14 of the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment", "conclusion": "Preliminary objections dismissed (Article 35-1 - Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Six month period;Article 35-3 - Continuing situation);Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Reasonable time);Non-pecuniary damage - award;Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Ale\u0161 Pejchal;Alvina Gyulumyan;Ann Power-Forde;Corneliu B\u00eersan;Dean Spielmann;Egbert Myjer;Florin Streteanu;Guido Raimondi;Ineta Ziemele;J\u00e1n \u0160ikuta;Johannes Silvis;Josep Casadevall;Krzysztof Wojtyczek;Ledi Bianku;Luis L\u00f3pez Guerra;Mark Villiger;Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska;Neboj\u0161a Vu\u010dini\u0107;Nona Tsotsoria;Paul Lemmens;Paulo Pinto De Albuquerque;Peer Lorenzen", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0917JUD001086509" }, "368": { "webcast_id": "1086509_02102013", "hearing_date": "2013-10-02 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Mocanu and Others v. Romania (nos 10865\/09, 45886\/07 and 32431\/08) ", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "45886\/07", "case_id": "001-114752", "case_name": "CASE OF MOCANU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-114752", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2012-11-13 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 3, "court": "6", "issue": "", "represented_by": "MATEI I. ; POPESCU A. ; SFIRAIALA I.; NACEA D.", "respondent": "ROU", "articles": "2;2-1;3;6;6-1;35;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Association 21 December 1989 and Others v. Romania, nos. 33810\/07 and 18817\/08, 24 May 2011;C.G. and Others v. Bulgaria (dec.), no 1365\/07, 13 March 2007;Chirita v. Romania (dec.), no 37147\/02, 6 September 2007;Delgado v. France, no 38437\/97, Commission decision of 9 September 1998;Dzieciak v. Poland, no 77766\/01, \u00a7 80, 9 December 2008;Erdogan Yagiz, no 27473\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 43-44, 6 March 2007;Folger\u00f8 and Others v. Norway (dec.), no 15472\/02, 14 February 2006;Frandes v. Romania (dec.), no 35802\/05, 17 May 2011;Frydlender v. France [GC], no 30979\/96, ECHR 2000-VII;G\u00e4fgen v. Germany [GC], no 22978\/05, \u00a7 92, ECHR 2010-...;G\u00fcle\u00e7 v. Turkey, 27 July 1998, \u00a7\u00a7 77-78, Reports 1998-IV;Isayeva and Others v. Russia, nos. 57947\/00, 57948\/00 and 57949\/00, \u00a7\u00a7 208-213, 24 February 2005;Labita v. Italy [GC], no 26772\/95, ECHR 2000-IV;Lapusan and Others v. Romania, nos. 29007\/06, 30552\/06, 31323\/06, 31920\/06, 34485\/06, 38960\/06, 38996\/06, 39027\/06 and 39067\/06, \u00a7 61, 8 March 2011;McKerr v. the United Kingdom, no 28883\/95, \u00a7 115, ECHR 2001-III;Melinte v. Romania, no 43247\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 33-36, 9 November 2006;Rupa v. Romania (no 1), no 58478\/00, \u00a7 90, 16 December 2008;Saileanu v. Romania, no 46268\/06, \u00a7 50, 2 February 2010;Sandru and Others v. Romania, no 22465\/03, 8 December 2009;Sel\u00e7uk and Asker v. Turkey, 24 April 1998, \u00a7 68, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-II;Selmouni v. France [GC], no 25803\/94, ECHR 1999-V;Sfrijan v. Romania, no 20366\/04, \u00a7\u00a7 44-48, 22 November 2007;\u0160ilih v. Slovenia, [GC], no 71463\/01, \u00a7\u00a7 159-163, 9 April 2009;Smirnova and Smirnova v. Russia (dec.), nos. 46133\/99 and 48183\/99, 3 October 2002;Streletz, Kessler and Krenz v. Germany [GC], nos. 34044\/96, 35532\/97 and 44801\/98, \u00a7\u00a7 80-81, ECHR 2001-II;Verein gegen Tierfabriken Schweiz (VgT) v. Switzerland (no 2) [GC], no 32772\/02, \u00a7 63, ECHR 2009-...;Yasa v. Turkey, 2 September 1998, \u00a7 74, Reports 1998-VI", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Reasonable time);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed;Non-pecuniary damage - award", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Alvina Gyulumyan;Corneliu B\u00eersan;Egbert Myjer;Florin Streteanu;Ineta Ziemele;J\u00e1n \u0160ikuta;Josep Casadevall;Luis L\u00f3pez Guerra", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1113JUD001086509" }, "369": { "webcast_id": "1086509_02102013", "hearing_date": "2013-10-02 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Mocanu and Others v. Romania (nos 10865\/09, 45886\/07 and 32431\/08) ", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "32431\/08", "case_id": "001-146540", "case_name": "CASE OF MOCANU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-146540", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2014-09-17 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "", "represented_by": "POPESCU A. ; SFIRAIALA I. ; MATEI I. ; NACEA D. ; HARTNEANU D.O.", "respondent": "ROU", "articles": "2;2-1;3;6;6-1;35;35-1;35-3;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Abd\u00fclsamet Yaman v. Turkey, no 32446\/96, \u00a7 55, 2 November 2004;Agache and Others v. Romania, no 2712\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 70-73, 20 October 2009;Ahmet \u00d6zkan and Others v. Turkey, no 21689\/93, \u00a7\u00a7 310 and 358, 6 April 2004;Akdivar and Others v. Turkey, 16 September 1996, Reports 1996 IV;Akhvlediani and Others v. Georgia (dec.), no 22026\/10, \u00a7\u00a7 23-29, 9 April 2013;Al-Skeini and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 55721\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 162-167, ECHR 2011;Assenov and Others v. Bulgaria, 28 October 1998, \u00a7 102, Reports 1998 VIII;Association \u00ab 21 Decembre 1989 \u00bb and Others v. Romania, nos. 33810\/07 and 18817\/08, 24 May 2011;Atallah v. France (dec.), no 51987\/07, 30 August 2011;Aydinlar and Others v. Turkey (dec.), no 3575\/05, 9 March 2010;Balogh v. Hungary, no 47940\/99, \u00a7 30, 20 July 2004;Barbu Anghelescu v. Romania, no 46430\/99, \u00a7 67, 5 October 2004;Bayram and Y\u0131ld\u0131r\u0131m v. Turkey (dec.), no 38587\/97, ECHR 2002-III;Ble\u010di\u0107 v. Croatia [GC], no 59532\/00, \u00a7 67, ECHR 2006 III;Brecknell v. the United Kingdom, no 32457\/04, \u00a7 71, 27 November 2007;Bulut and Yavuz (dec.), no 76065\/01, 28 May 2002;Bursuc v. Romania, no 42066\/98, \u00a7 107, 12 October 2004;\u00c7amdereli v. Turkey, no 28433\/02, \u00a7 38, 17 July 2008;Chiragov and Others v. Armenia (dec.) [GC], no 13216\/05, \u00a7 136, 14 December 2011;Cr\u0103iniceanu and Frumu\u015fanu v. Romania, no 12442\/04, \u00a7 92, 24 April 2012;Demopoulos and Others v. Turkey (dec.) [GC], nos. 46113\/99 and Others, \u00a7 69, ECHR 2010;Dennis and Others v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no 76573\/01, 2 July 2002;El-Masri v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia [GC], no. 39630\/09, ECHR 2012;Er and Others v. Turkey, no 23016\/04, \u00a7 52, 31 July 2012;Frandes v. Romania (dec.), no. 35802\/05, 17 May 2011;Frydlender v. France [GC], no 30979\/96, \u00a7 46, ECHR 2000 VII;G\u00e4fgen v. Germany [GC], no 22978\/05, \u00a7 117, ECHR 2010;Gheorghe and Maria Mihaela Dumitrescu v. Romania, no 6373, \u00a7\u00a7 26-28, 29 July 2008;G\u00fcrtekin and Others v. Cyprus (dec.), nos. 60441\/13, 68206\/13 and 68667\/13, 11 March 2014;Gusar v. Moldova (dec.), no 37204\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 14-17, 30 April 2013;Halat v. Turkey, no 23607\/08, \u00a7 51, 8 November 2011;Haralambie v. Romania, no 21737\/03, \u00a7 70, 27 October 2009;Isayeva and Others v. Russia, nos. 57947\/00, 57948\/00 and 57949\/00, \u00a7 149, 24 February 2005;Janowiec and Others v. Russia [GC], nos. 55508\/07 and 29520\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 128-151, 21 October 2013;Julari\u0107 v. Croatia, no 20106\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 45-51, 20 January 2011;Kuri\u0107 and Others v. Slovenia [GC], no 26828\/06, \u00a7 286, ECHR 2012 (extracts);L\u0103pu\u015fan and Others v. Romania, nos. 29007\/06, 30552\/06, 31323\/06, 31920\/06, 34485\/06, 38960\/06, 38996\/06, 39027\/06 and 39067\/06, 8 March 2011;M.B. v. Romania, no 43982\/06, \u00a7 64, 3 November 2011;M.C. v. Bulgaria, no 39272\/98, \u00a7 150, ECHR 2003 XII;McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, 27 September 1995, \u00a7 161, Series A no 324;McFarlane v. Ireland [GC], no 31333\/06, \u00a7 107, 10 September 2010;McKerr v. the United Kingdom, no 28883\/95, \u00a7\u00a7 114-115, ECHR 2001-III;Micu v. Romania, no 29883\/06, \u00a7 108, 8 February 2011;Nachova and Others v. Bulgaria [GC], nos. 43577\/98 and 43579\/98, \u00a7\u00a7 110 and 112-113, ECHR 2005-VII;Narin v. Turkey, no 18907\/02, \u00a7 51, 15 December 2009;Nasirkhayeva v. Russia (dec.), no 1721\/07, 31 May 2011;Pa\u00e7ac\u0131 and Others v. Turkey, no 3064\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 63-66, 8 November 2011;Pali\u0107 v. Bosnia and Herzegovina, no 4704\/04, \u00a7 52, 15 February 2011;Pastor and \u0162iclete v. Romania, nos. 30911\/06 and 40967\/06, \u00a7 58, 19 April 2011;Paul and Audrey Edwards v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no 46477\/99, 4 June 2001;Ramsahai and Others v. the Netherlands [GC], no 52391\/99, \u00a7\u00a7 324-325, ECHR 2007 II;Ringeisen v. Austria, 16 July 1971, \u00a7 89, Series A no 13;R\u00f6man v. Finland, no 13072\/05, \u00a7 50, 29 January 2013;Sabri G\u00fcne\u015f v. Turkey [GC], no 27396\/06, \u00a7 39, 29 June 2012;\u015eandru and Others v. Romania, no 22465\/03, \u00a7\u00a7 55 59, 8 December 2009;Sargsyan v. Azerbaijan (dec.) [GC], no 40167\/06, \u00a7 135, 14 December 2011;Scoppola v. Italy (no 2) [GC], no 10249\/03, \u00a7 70, 17 September 2009;Sejdovic v. Italy [GC], no 56581\/00, \u00a7 46, ECHR 2006 II;\u0160ilih v. Slovenia [GC], no 71463\/01, \u00a7\u00a7 159-163, 9 April 2009;Soering v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 7 July 1989, Series A no 161, p. 34, \u00a7 88;Varnava and Others v. Turkey [GC], nos. 16064\/90, 16065\/90, 16066\/90, 16068\/90, 16069\/90, 16070\/90, 16071\/90, 16072\/90 and 16073\/90, ECHR 2009;Velev v. Bulgaria, no 43531\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 59-60, 16 April 2013;Vu\u010dkovi\u0107 and Others v. Serbia [GC], nos. 17153\/11 and Others, 25 March 2014;Walker v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no 34979\/97, ECHR 2000 I;Ya\u015fa v. Turkey, 2 September 1998, \u00a7 74, Reports 1998 VI;Yeter v. Turkey, no 33750\/03, \u00a7 70, 13 January 2009;Yeti\u015fen and Others v. Turkey, no 21099\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 72-85, 10 July 2012", "external_sources": "General Comment No. 3 (2012) issued by the United Nations Committee against Torture on the Implementation by States parties of Article 14 of the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment", "conclusion": "Preliminary objections dismissed (Article 35-1 - Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Six month period;Article 35-3 - Continuing situation);Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Reasonable time);Non-pecuniary damage - award;Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Ale\u0161 Pejchal;Alvina Gyulumyan;Ann Power-Forde;Corneliu B\u00eersan;Dean Spielmann;Egbert Myjer;Florin Streteanu;Guido Raimondi;Ineta Ziemele;J\u00e1n \u0160ikuta;Johannes Silvis;Josep Casadevall;Krzysztof Wojtyczek;Ledi Bianku;Luis L\u00f3pez Guerra;Mark Villiger;Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska;Neboj\u0161a Vu\u010dini\u0107;Nona Tsotsoria;Paul Lemmens;Paulo Pinto De Albuquerque;Peer Lorenzen", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0917JUD001086509" }, "370": { "webcast_id": "1086509_02102013", "hearing_date": "2013-10-02 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Mocanu and Others v. Romania (nos 10865\/09, 45886\/07 and 32431\/08) ", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "32431\/08", "case_id": "001-114752", "case_name": "CASE OF MOCANU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-114752", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2012-11-13 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 3, "court": "6", "issue": "", "represented_by": "MATEI I. ; POPESCU A. ; SFIRAIALA I.; NACEA D.", "respondent": "ROU", "articles": "2;2-1;3;6;6-1;35;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Association 21 December 1989 and Others v. Romania, nos. 33810\/07 and 18817\/08, 24 May 2011;C.G. and Others v. Bulgaria (dec.), no 1365\/07, 13 March 2007;Chirita v. Romania (dec.), no 37147\/02, 6 September 2007;Delgado v. France, no 38437\/97, Commission decision of 9 September 1998;Dzieciak v. Poland, no 77766\/01, \u00a7 80, 9 December 2008;Erdogan Yagiz, no 27473\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 43-44, 6 March 2007;Folger\u00f8 and Others v. Norway (dec.), no 15472\/02, 14 February 2006;Frandes v. Romania (dec.), no 35802\/05, 17 May 2011;Frydlender v. France [GC], no 30979\/96, ECHR 2000-VII;G\u00e4fgen v. Germany [GC], no 22978\/05, \u00a7 92, ECHR 2010-...;G\u00fcle\u00e7 v. Turkey, 27 July 1998, \u00a7\u00a7 77-78, Reports 1998-IV;Isayeva and Others v. Russia, nos. 57947\/00, 57948\/00 and 57949\/00, \u00a7\u00a7 208-213, 24 February 2005;Labita v. Italy [GC], no 26772\/95, ECHR 2000-IV;Lapusan and Others v. Romania, nos. 29007\/06, 30552\/06, 31323\/06, 31920\/06, 34485\/06, 38960\/06, 38996\/06, 39027\/06 and 39067\/06, \u00a7 61, 8 March 2011;McKerr v. the United Kingdom, no 28883\/95, \u00a7 115, ECHR 2001-III;Melinte v. Romania, no 43247\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 33-36, 9 November 2006;Rupa v. Romania (no 1), no 58478\/00, \u00a7 90, 16 December 2008;Saileanu v. Romania, no 46268\/06, \u00a7 50, 2 February 2010;Sandru and Others v. Romania, no 22465\/03, 8 December 2009;Sel\u00e7uk and Asker v. Turkey, 24 April 1998, \u00a7 68, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-II;Selmouni v. France [GC], no 25803\/94, ECHR 1999-V;Sfrijan v. Romania, no 20366\/04, \u00a7\u00a7 44-48, 22 November 2007;\u0160ilih v. Slovenia, [GC], no 71463\/01, \u00a7\u00a7 159-163, 9 April 2009;Smirnova and Smirnova v. Russia (dec.), nos. 46133\/99 and 48183\/99, 3 October 2002;Streletz, Kessler and Krenz v. Germany [GC], nos. 34044\/96, 35532\/97 and 44801\/98, \u00a7\u00a7 80-81, ECHR 2001-II;Verein gegen Tierfabriken Schweiz (VgT) v. Switzerland (no 2) [GC], no 32772\/02, \u00a7 63, ECHR 2009-...;Yasa v. Turkey, 2 September 1998, \u00a7 74, Reports 1998-VI", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Reasonable time);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed;Non-pecuniary damage - award", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Alvina Gyulumyan;Corneliu B\u00eersan;Egbert Myjer;Florin Streteanu;Ineta Ziemele;J\u00e1n \u0160ikuta;Josep Casadevall;Luis L\u00f3pez Guerra", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1113JUD001086509" }, "371": { "webcast_id": "3254108_18092013", "hearing_date": "2013-09-18 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Svinarenko and Slyadnev v. Russia (nos. 32541\/08 and 43441\/08)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber Judgment hearing", "appno": "32541\/08", "case_id": "001-145817", "case_name": "CASE OF SVINARENKO AND SLYADNEV v. RUSSIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-145817", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2014-07-17 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "\n", "represented_by": "PALCHINSKII V. ; PLOTNIKOV E. ; TAYSAEVA V.", "respondent": "RUS", "articles": "3;5;5-3;6;6-1;34;35;35-1;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Allen v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 25424\/09, \u00a7 94, ECHR 2013;Ashot Harutyunyan v. Armenia, no. 34334\/04, 15 June 2010;Atanasov v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, no. 22745\/06, \u00a7 31, 17 February 2011;Blake v. the United Kingdom, no. 68890\/01, \u00a7 45, 26 September 2006;Borgers v. Belgium, 30 October 1991, \u00a7 24, Series A no. 214 B;Cyprus v. Turkey [GC], no. 25781\/94, \u00a7 104, ECHR 2001 IV;De Cubber v. Belgium, 26 October 1984, \u00a7 26, Series A no. 86;El-Masri v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia [GC], no. 39630\/09, \u00a7 202, ECHR 2012;Erdo\u011fan Ya\u011f\u0131z v. Turkey, no. 27473\/02, \u00a7 37, 6 March 2007;Fetisov and Others v. Russia, nos. 43710\/07, 6023\/08, 11248\/08, 27668\/08, 31242\/08 and 52133\/08, \u00a7 75, 17 January 2012;Gorodnitchev v. Russia, no. 52058\/99, \u00a7\u00a7 101, 102, 105 and 108, 24 May 2007;Insanov v. Azerbaijan, no. 16133\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 168-170, 14 March 2013;Iordache v. Romania, no. 6817\/02, \u00a7 50, 14 October 2008;Jalloh v. Germany [GC], no. 54810\/00, \u00a7 67, ECHR 2006 IX;Kalashnikov v. Russia, no. 47095\/99, \u00a7 132, ECHR 2002 VI;Khodorkovskiy and Lebedev v. Russia, nos. 11082\/06 and 13772\/05, 25 July 2013;Khodorkovskiy v. Russia, no. 5829\/04, \u00a7 125, 31 May 2011;Kud\u0142a v. Poland [GC], no. 30210\/96, \u00a7\u00a7 92-94, ECHR 2000 XI;Kummer v. the Czech Republic, no. 32133\/11, \u00a7 64, 25 July 2013;Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772\/95, \u00a7 119, ECHR 2000-IV;M.S.S. v. Belgium and Greece [GC], no. 30696\/09, \u00a7 220, ECHR 2011;Mikhail Grishin v. Russia, no. 14807\/08, 24 July 2012;Miros\u0142aw Garlicki v. Poland, no. 36921\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 73-75, 14 June 2011;\u00d6calan v. Turkey [GC], no. 46221\/99, \u00a7 182, ECHR 2005 IV;P\u00e9lissier and Sassi v. France [GC], no. 25444\/94, \u00a7 67, ECHR 1999 II;Petkov and Others v. Bulgaria (dec.), nos. 77568\/01, 178\/02 and 505\/02, 4 December 2007;Piruzyan v. Armenia, no. 33376\/07, 26 June 2012;Pretty v. the United Kingdom, no. 2346\/02, \u00a7 65, ECHR 2002 III;Ramishvili and Kokhreidze v. Georgia, no. 1704\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 101-102, 27 January 2009;Raninen v. Finland, 16 December 1997, \u00a7 56, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997 VIII;Sabri G\u00fcne\u015f v. Turkey [GC], no. 27396\/06, \u00a7 29, 29 June 2012;Sarban v. Moldova, no. 3456\/05, \u00a7 89, 4 October 2005;Silver and Others v. the United Kingdom, 25 March 1983, \u00a7\u00a7 86-87, Series A no. 61;Soering v. the United Kingdom, 7 July 1989, \u00a7 87, Series A no. 161;Stanford v. the United Kingdom, 23 February 1994, \u00a7\u00a7 27 32, Series A no. 282 A;Titarenko v. Ukraine, no. 31720\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 58 64, 20 September 2012;Tyrer v. the United Kingdom, 25 April 1978, \u00a7 32, Series A no. 26;\u00dclke v. Turkey (dec.), no. 39437\/98, 1 June 2004;V. v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 24888\/94, \u00a7 71, ECHR 1999-IX;Varnava and Others v. Turkey [GC], nos. 16064\/90, 16065\/90, 16066\/90, 16068\/90, 16069\/90, 16070\/90, 16071\/90, 16072\/90 and 16073\/90, \u00a7 157, ECHR 2009;Zhuk v. Ukraine, no. 45783\/05, \u00a7 27, 21 October 2010", "external_sources": "Article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights;Article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights in conjunction with Article 14 (1) of the Covenant;United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners;Rules of Procedure of international criminal tribunals;Amnesty International Fair Trials Manual", "conclusion": "Preliminary objection dismissed (Article 34 - Victim);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Reasonable time);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed;Non-pecuniary damage - award", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Anatoly Kovler;Dean Spielmann;Dmitry Dedov;Elisabeth Steiner;George Nicolaou;Guido Raimondi;Helen Keller;Helena J\u00e4derblom;Ineta Ziemele;Isabelle Berro-Lef\u00e8vre;J\u00e1n \u0160ikuta;Johannes Silvis;Josep Casadevall;Julia Laffranque;Khanlar Hajiyev;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Luis L\u00f3pez Guerra;Mark Villiger;Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska;Peer Lorenzen;Vincent A. De Gaetano", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0717JUD003254108" }, "372": { "webcast_id": "3254108_18092013", "hearing_date": "2013-09-18 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Svinarenko and Slyadnev v. Russia (nos. 32541\/08 and 43441\/08)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber Judgment hearing", "appno": "32541\/08", "case_id": "001-115176", "case_name": "CASE OF SVINARENKO AND SLYADNEV v. RUSSIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-115176", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2012-12-11 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "4", "issue": "", "represented_by": "PALCHINSKIY V. G. ; PLOTNIKOV Ye. F.", "respondent": "RUS", "articles": "3;6;6-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Allen v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 25424\/09, \u00a7 94, ECHR 2013;Ashot Harutyunyan v. Armenia, no. 34334\/04, 15 June 2010;Atanasov v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, no. 22745\/06, \u00a7 31, 17 February 2011;Blake v. the United Kingdom, no. 68890\/01, \u00a7 45, 26 September 2006;Borgers v. Belgium, 30 October 1991, \u00a7 24, Series A no. 214 B;Cyprus v. Turkey [GC], no. 25781\/94, \u00a7 104, ECHR 2001 IV;De Cubber v. Belgium, 26 October 1984, \u00a7 26, Series A no. 86;El-Masri v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia [GC], no. 39630\/09, \u00a7 202, ECHR 2012;Erdo\u011fan Ya\u011f\u0131z v. Turkey, no. 27473\/02, \u00a7 37, 6 March 2007;Fetisov and Others v. Russia, nos. 43710\/07, 6023\/08, 11248\/08, 27668\/08, 31242\/08 and 52133\/08, \u00a7 75, 17 January 2012;Gorodnitchev v. Russia, no. 52058\/99, \u00a7\u00a7 101, 102, 105 and 108, 24 May 2007;Insanov v. Azerbaijan, no. 16133\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 168-170, 14 March 2013;Iordache v. Romania, no. 6817\/02, \u00a7 50, 14 October 2008;Jalloh v. Germany [GC], no. 54810\/00, \u00a7 67, ECHR 2006 IX;Kalashnikov v. Russia, no. 47095\/99, \u00a7 132, ECHR 2002 VI;Khodorkovskiy and Lebedev v. Russia, nos. 11082\/06 and 13772\/05, 25 July 2013;Khodorkovskiy v. Russia, no. 5829\/04, \u00a7 125, 31 May 2011;Kud\u0142a v. Poland [GC], no. 30210\/96, \u00a7\u00a7 92-94, ECHR 2000 XI;Kummer v. the Czech Republic, no. 32133\/11, \u00a7 64, 25 July 2013;Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772\/95, \u00a7 119, ECHR 2000-IV;M.S.S. v. Belgium and Greece [GC], no. 30696\/09, \u00a7 220, ECHR 2011;Mikhail Grishin v. Russia, no. 14807\/08, 24 July 2012;Miros\u0142aw Garlicki v. Poland, no. 36921\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 73-75, 14 June 2011;\u00d6calan v. Turkey [GC], no. 46221\/99, \u00a7 182, ECHR 2005 IV;P\u00e9lissier and Sassi v. France [GC], no. 25444\/94, \u00a7 67, ECHR 1999 II;Petkov and Others v. Bulgaria (dec.), nos. 77568\/01, 178\/02 and 505\/02, 4 December 2007;Piruzyan v. Armenia, no. 33376\/07, 26 June 2012;Pretty v. the United Kingdom, no. 2346\/02, \u00a7 65, ECHR 2002 III;Ramishvili and Kokhreidze v. Georgia, no. 1704\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 101-102, 27 January 2009;Raninen v. Finland, 16 December 1997, \u00a7 56, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997 VIII;Sabri G\u00fcne\u015f v. Turkey [GC], no. 27396\/06, \u00a7 29, 29 June 2012;Sarban v. Moldova, no. 3456\/05, \u00a7 89, 4 October 2005;Silver and Others v. the United Kingdom, 25 March 1983, \u00a7\u00a7 86-87, Series A no. 61;Soering v. the United Kingdom, 7 July 1989, \u00a7 87, Series A no. 161;Stanford v. the United Kingdom, 23 February 1994, \u00a7\u00a7 27 32, Series A no. 282 A;Titarenko v. Ukraine, no. 31720\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 58 64, 20 September 2012;Tyrer v. the United Kingdom, 25 April 1978, \u00a7 32, Series A no. 26;\u00dclke v. Turkey (dec.), no. 39437\/98, 1 June 2004;V. v. the United Kingdom, cited above, \u00a7 71;V. v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 24888\/94, \u00a7 71, ECHR 1999-IX;Varnava and Others v. Turkey [GC], nos. 16064\/90, 16065\/90, 16066\/90, 16068\/90, 16069\/90, 16070\/90, 16071\/90, 16072\/90 and 16073\/90, \u00a7 157, ECHR 2009;Zhuk v. Ukraine, no. 45783\/05, \u00a7 27, 21 October 2010", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Reasonable time)", "separate_opinion": "FALSE", "judges": "Anatoly Kovler;Elisabeth Steiner;Isabelle Berro-Lef\u00e8vre;Julia Laffranque;Khanlar Hajiyev;Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1211JUD003254108" }, "373": { "webcast_id": "3254108_18092013", "hearing_date": "2013-09-18 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Svinarenko and Slyadnev v. Russia (nos. 32541\/08 and 43441\/08)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber Judgment hearing", "appno": "43441\/08", "case_id": "001-145817", "case_name": "CASE OF SVINARENKO AND SLYADNEV v. RUSSIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-145817", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2014-07-17 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "\n", "represented_by": "PALCHINSKII V. ; PLOTNIKOV E. ; TAYSAEVA V.", "respondent": "RUS", "articles": "3;5;5-3;6;6-1;34;35;35-1;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Allen v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 25424\/09, \u00a7 94, ECHR 2013;Ashot Harutyunyan v. Armenia, no. 34334\/04, 15 June 2010;Atanasov v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, no. 22745\/06, \u00a7 31, 17 February 2011;Blake v. the United Kingdom, no. 68890\/01, \u00a7 45, 26 September 2006;Borgers v. Belgium, 30 October 1991, \u00a7 24, Series A no. 214 B;Cyprus v. Turkey [GC], no. 25781\/94, \u00a7 104, ECHR 2001 IV;De Cubber v. Belgium, 26 October 1984, \u00a7 26, Series A no. 86;El-Masri v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia [GC], no. 39630\/09, \u00a7 202, ECHR 2012;Erdo\u011fan Ya\u011f\u0131z v. Turkey, no. 27473\/02, \u00a7 37, 6 March 2007;Fetisov and Others v. Russia, nos. 43710\/07, 6023\/08, 11248\/08, 27668\/08, 31242\/08 and 52133\/08, \u00a7 75, 17 January 2012;Gorodnitchev v. Russia, no. 52058\/99, \u00a7\u00a7 101, 102, 105 and 108, 24 May 2007;Insanov v. Azerbaijan, no. 16133\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 168-170, 14 March 2013;Iordache v. Romania, no. 6817\/02, \u00a7 50, 14 October 2008;Jalloh v. Germany [GC], no. 54810\/00, \u00a7 67, ECHR 2006 IX;Kalashnikov v. Russia, no. 47095\/99, \u00a7 132, ECHR 2002 VI;Khodorkovskiy and Lebedev v. Russia, nos. 11082\/06 and 13772\/05, 25 July 2013;Khodorkovskiy v. Russia, no. 5829\/04, \u00a7 125, 31 May 2011;Kud\u0142a v. Poland [GC], no. 30210\/96, \u00a7\u00a7 92-94, ECHR 2000 XI;Kummer v. the Czech Republic, no. 32133\/11, \u00a7 64, 25 July 2013;Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772\/95, \u00a7 119, ECHR 2000-IV;M.S.S. v. Belgium and Greece [GC], no. 30696\/09, \u00a7 220, ECHR 2011;Mikhail Grishin v. Russia, no. 14807\/08, 24 July 2012;Miros\u0142aw Garlicki v. Poland, no. 36921\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 73-75, 14 June 2011;\u00d6calan v. Turkey [GC], no. 46221\/99, \u00a7 182, ECHR 2005 IV;P\u00e9lissier and Sassi v. France [GC], no. 25444\/94, \u00a7 67, ECHR 1999 II;Petkov and Others v. Bulgaria (dec.), nos. 77568\/01, 178\/02 and 505\/02, 4 December 2007;Piruzyan v. Armenia, no. 33376\/07, 26 June 2012;Pretty v. the United Kingdom, no. 2346\/02, \u00a7 65, ECHR 2002 III;Ramishvili and Kokhreidze v. Georgia, no. 1704\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 101-102, 27 January 2009;Raninen v. Finland, 16 December 1997, \u00a7 56, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997 VIII;Sabri G\u00fcne\u015f v. Turkey [GC], no. 27396\/06, \u00a7 29, 29 June 2012;Sarban v. Moldova, no. 3456\/05, \u00a7 89, 4 October 2005;Silver and Others v. the United Kingdom, 25 March 1983, \u00a7\u00a7 86-87, Series A no. 61;Soering v. the United Kingdom, 7 July 1989, \u00a7 87, Series A no. 161;Stanford v. the United Kingdom, 23 February 1994, \u00a7\u00a7 27 32, Series A no. 282 A;Titarenko v. Ukraine, no. 31720\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 58 64, 20 September 2012;Tyrer v. the United Kingdom, 25 April 1978, \u00a7 32, Series A no. 26;\u00dclke v. Turkey (dec.), no. 39437\/98, 1 June 2004;V. v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 24888\/94, \u00a7 71, ECHR 1999-IX;Varnava and Others v. Turkey [GC], nos. 16064\/90, 16065\/90, 16066\/90, 16068\/90, 16069\/90, 16070\/90, 16071\/90, 16072\/90 and 16073\/90, \u00a7 157, ECHR 2009;Zhuk v. Ukraine, no. 45783\/05, \u00a7 27, 21 October 2010", "external_sources": "Article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights;Article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights in conjunction with Article 14 (1) of the Covenant;United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners;Rules of Procedure of international criminal tribunals;Amnesty International Fair Trials Manual", "conclusion": "Preliminary objection dismissed (Article 34 - Victim);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Reasonable time);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed;Non-pecuniary damage - award", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Anatoly Kovler;Dean Spielmann;Dmitry Dedov;Elisabeth Steiner;George Nicolaou;Guido Raimondi;Helen Keller;Helena J\u00e4derblom;Ineta Ziemele;Isabelle Berro-Lef\u00e8vre;J\u00e1n \u0160ikuta;Johannes Silvis;Josep Casadevall;Julia Laffranque;Khanlar Hajiyev;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Luis L\u00f3pez Guerra;Mark Villiger;Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska;Peer Lorenzen;Vincent A. De Gaetano", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0717JUD003254108" }, "374": { "webcast_id": "3254108_18092013", "hearing_date": "2013-09-18 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Svinarenko and Slyadnev v. Russia (nos. 32541\/08 and 43441\/08)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber Judgment hearing", "appno": "43441\/08", "case_id": "001-115176", "case_name": "CASE OF SVINARENKO AND SLYADNEV v. RUSSIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-115176", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2012-12-11 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "4", "issue": "", "represented_by": "PALCHINSKIY V. G. ; PLOTNIKOV Ye. F.", "respondent": "RUS", "articles": "3;6;6-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Allen v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 25424\/09, \u00a7 94, ECHR 2013;Ashot Harutyunyan v. Armenia, no. 34334\/04, 15 June 2010;Atanasov v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, no. 22745\/06, \u00a7 31, 17 February 2011;Blake v. the United Kingdom, no. 68890\/01, \u00a7 45, 26 September 2006;Borgers v. Belgium, 30 October 1991, \u00a7 24, Series A no. 214 B;Cyprus v. Turkey [GC], no. 25781\/94, \u00a7 104, ECHR 2001 IV;De Cubber v. Belgium, 26 October 1984, \u00a7 26, Series A no. 86;El-Masri v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia [GC], no. 39630\/09, \u00a7 202, ECHR 2012;Erdo\u011fan Ya\u011f\u0131z v. Turkey, no. 27473\/02, \u00a7 37, 6 March 2007;Fetisov and Others v. Russia, nos. 43710\/07, 6023\/08, 11248\/08, 27668\/08, 31242\/08 and 52133\/08, \u00a7 75, 17 January 2012;Gorodnitchev v. Russia, no. 52058\/99, \u00a7\u00a7 101, 102, 105 and 108, 24 May 2007;Insanov v. Azerbaijan, no. 16133\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 168-170, 14 March 2013;Iordache v. Romania, no. 6817\/02, \u00a7 50, 14 October 2008;Jalloh v. Germany [GC], no. 54810\/00, \u00a7 67, ECHR 2006 IX;Kalashnikov v. Russia, no. 47095\/99, \u00a7 132, ECHR 2002 VI;Khodorkovskiy and Lebedev v. Russia, nos. 11082\/06 and 13772\/05, 25 July 2013;Khodorkovskiy v. Russia, no. 5829\/04, \u00a7 125, 31 May 2011;Kud\u0142a v. Poland [GC], no. 30210\/96, \u00a7\u00a7 92-94, ECHR 2000 XI;Kummer v. the Czech Republic, no. 32133\/11, \u00a7 64, 25 July 2013;Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772\/95, \u00a7 119, ECHR 2000-IV;M.S.S. v. Belgium and Greece [GC], no. 30696\/09, \u00a7 220, ECHR 2011;Mikhail Grishin v. Russia, no. 14807\/08, 24 July 2012;Miros\u0142aw Garlicki v. Poland, no. 36921\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 73-75, 14 June 2011;\u00d6calan v. Turkey [GC], no. 46221\/99, \u00a7 182, ECHR 2005 IV;P\u00e9lissier and Sassi v. France [GC], no. 25444\/94, \u00a7 67, ECHR 1999 II;Petkov and Others v. Bulgaria (dec.), nos. 77568\/01, 178\/02 and 505\/02, 4 December 2007;Piruzyan v. Armenia, no. 33376\/07, 26 June 2012;Pretty v. the United Kingdom, no. 2346\/02, \u00a7 65, ECHR 2002 III;Ramishvili and Kokhreidze v. Georgia, no. 1704\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 101-102, 27 January 2009;Raninen v. Finland, 16 December 1997, \u00a7 56, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997 VIII;Sabri G\u00fcne\u015f v. Turkey [GC], no. 27396\/06, \u00a7 29, 29 June 2012;Sarban v. Moldova, no. 3456\/05, \u00a7 89, 4 October 2005;Silver and Others v. the United Kingdom, 25 March 1983, \u00a7\u00a7 86-87, Series A no. 61;Soering v. the United Kingdom, 7 July 1989, \u00a7 87, Series A no. 161;Stanford v. the United Kingdom, 23 February 1994, \u00a7\u00a7 27 32, Series A no. 282 A;Titarenko v. Ukraine, no. 31720\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 58 64, 20 September 2012;Tyrer v. the United Kingdom, 25 April 1978, \u00a7 32, Series A no. 26;\u00dclke v. Turkey (dec.), no. 39437\/98, 1 June 2004;V. v. the United Kingdom, cited above, \u00a7 71;V. v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 24888\/94, \u00a7 71, ECHR 1999-IX;Varnava and Others v. Turkey [GC], nos. 16064\/90, 16065\/90, 16066\/90, 16068\/90, 16069\/90, 16070\/90, 16071\/90, 16072\/90 and 16073\/90, \u00a7 157, ECHR 2009;Zhuk v. Ukraine, no. 45783\/05, \u00a7 27, 21 October 2010", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Reasonable time)", "separate_opinion": "FALSE", "judges": "Anatoly Kovler;Elisabeth Steiner;Isabelle Berro-Lef\u00e8vre;Julia Laffranque;Khanlar Hajiyev;Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1211JUD003254108" }, "375": { "webcast_id": "2885911_10092013", "hearing_date": "2013-09-10 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Dubsk\u00e1 and Krejzov\u00e1 v. the Czech Republic (nos. 28859\/11 and 28473\/12 )", "hearing_type": "Chamber hearing", "appno": "28859\/11", "case_id": "001-168066", "case_name": "CASE OF DUBSK\u00c1 AND KREJZOV\u00c1 v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-168066", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2016-11-15 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Health Care in Private Health-Care Institutions Act ; Decree no. 424\/2004 of the Ministry of Health ; Decree no. 55\/2011 of the Ministry of Health ; Decree no. 221\/2010 of the Ministry of Health ; Decree no. 92\/2012 of the Ministry of Health", "represented_by": "ZAHUMENSKY D. ; HOREJSI R.", "respondent": "CZE", "articles": "8;8-1;8-2", "strasbourg_caselaw": "A, B and C v. Ireland [GC], no. 25579\/05, ECHR 2010;Fern\u00e1ndez Martinez v. Spain [GC], no. 56030\/07, \u00a7 124, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Hristozov and Others v. Bulgaria, nos. 47039\/11 and 358\/12, ECHR 2012 (extracts);Maurice v. France [GC], no. 11810\/03, ECHR 2005-IX;Odi\u00e8vre v. France [GC], no. 42326\/98, \u00a7 29, ECHR 2003-III;Parrillo v. Italy [GC], no. 46470\/11, ECHR 2015;S. and Marper v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 30562\/04 and 30566\/04, \u00a7 101, ECHR 2008;S.H. and Others v. Austria [GC], no. 57813\/00, ECHR 2011;Shelley v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 23800\/06, 4 January 2008;Stec and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 65731\/01 and 65900\/01, ECHR 2006-VI;Ternovszky v. Hungary, no. 67545\/09, 14 December 2010;Van Der Heijden v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 42857\/05, \u00a7 56, 3 April 2012", "external_sources": "Concluding Observations of the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women on the Czech Republic of 22 October 2010 (CEDAW\/C\/CZE\/CO\/5)", "conclusion": "No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Ale\u0161 Pejchal;Andr\u00e1s Saj\u00f3;Andr\u00e9 Potocki;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Dmitry Dedov;Egidijus K\u016bris;Ganna Yudkivska;George Nicolaou;Guido Raimondi;Helen Keller;Helena J\u00e4derblom;Jon Fridrik Kj\u00f8lbro;Julia Laffranque;Kristina Pardalos;Luis L\u00f3pez Guerra;Mark Villiger;Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska;Paul Lemmens;S\u00edofra O'Leary", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1115JUD002885911" }, "376": { "webcast_id": "2885911_10092013", "hearing_date": "2013-09-10 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Dubsk\u00e1 and Krejzov\u00e1 v. the Czech Republic (nos. 28859\/11 and 28473\/12 )", "hearing_type": "Chamber hearing", "appno": "28859\/11", "case_id": "001-148632", "case_name": "CASE OF DUBSK\u00c1 AND KREJZOV\u00c1 v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-148632", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2014-12-11 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 2, "court": "23", "issue": "Medical Services Act", "represented_by": "ZAHUMENSKY D. ; HOREJSI R.", "respondent": "CZE", "articles": "8;8-1;8-2;35", "strasbourg_caselaw": "A, B and C v. Ireland [GC], no. 25579\/05, 16 December 2010;Connors v. the United Kingdom, no. 66746\/01, \u00a7 82, 27 May 2004;Dickson v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 44362\/04, \u00a7 66, ECHR 2007-V;Evans v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 6339\/05, \u00a7 71, ECHR 2007 I;Haas v. Switzerland, no. 31322\/07, \u00a7 50, 20 January 2011;Haase v. Germany, no. 11057\/02, \u00a7 93, ECHR 2004 III (extracts);Odi\u00e8vre v. France, [GC], no. 42326\/98, \u00a7 29, ECHR 2003 III;Pretty v. the United Kingdom, no. 2346\/02, \u00a7 61, ECHR 2002 III;Stubing v. Germany, no. 43547\/08, \u00a7 60, 12 April 2012;Tysi\u0105c v. Poland, no. 5410\/03, \u00a7 107, ECHR 2007 I", "external_sources": "Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women\u2019s Concluding Observations on the Czech Republic of 22 October 2010 (CEDAW\/C\/CZE\/CO\/5)", "conclusion": "No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Ale\u0161 Pejchal;Andr\u00e9 Potocki;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Ganna Yudkivska;Mark Villiger;Paul Lemmens", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1211JUD002885911" }, "377": { "webcast_id": "2885911_10092013", "hearing_date": "2013-09-10 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Dubsk\u00e1 and Krejzov\u00e1 v. the Czech Republic (nos. 28859\/11 and 28473\/12 )", "hearing_type": "Chamber hearing", "appno": "28859\/11", "case_id": "001-113345", "case_name": "DUBSK\u00c1 v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-113345", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "2012-09-03 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "ZAHUMENSKY D.", "respondent": "CZE", "articles": "8;8-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Communicated", "separate_opinion": "FALSE", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "378": { "webcast_id": "2885911_10092013", "hearing_date": "2013-09-10 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Dubsk\u00e1 and Krejzov\u00e1 v. the Czech Republic (nos. 28859\/11 and 28473\/12 )", "hearing_type": "Chamber hearing", "appno": "28473\/12", "case_id": "001-168066", "case_name": "CASE OF DUBSK\u00c1 AND KREJZOV\u00c1 v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-168066", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2016-11-15 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Health Care in Private Health-Care Institutions Act ; Decree no. 424\/2004 of the Ministry of Health ; Decree no. 55\/2011 of the Ministry of Health ; Decree no. 221\/2010 of the Ministry of Health ; Decree no. 92\/2012 of the Ministry of Health", "represented_by": "ZAHUMENSKY D. ; HOREJSI R.", "respondent": "CZE", "articles": "8;8-1;8-2", "strasbourg_caselaw": "A, B and C v. Ireland [GC], no. 25579\/05, ECHR 2010;Fern\u00e1ndez Martinez v. Spain [GC], no. 56030\/07, \u00a7 124, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Hristozov and Others v. Bulgaria, nos. 47039\/11 and 358\/12, ECHR 2012 (extracts);Maurice v. France [GC], no. 11810\/03, ECHR 2005-IX;Odi\u00e8vre v. France [GC], no. 42326\/98, \u00a7 29, ECHR 2003-III;Parrillo v. Italy [GC], no. 46470\/11, ECHR 2015;S. and Marper v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 30562\/04 and 30566\/04, \u00a7 101, ECHR 2008;S.H. and Others v. Austria [GC], no. 57813\/00, ECHR 2011;Shelley v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 23800\/06, 4 January 2008;Stec and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 65731\/01 and 65900\/01, ECHR 2006-VI;Ternovszky v. Hungary, no. 67545\/09, 14 December 2010;Van Der Heijden v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 42857\/05, \u00a7 56, 3 April 2012", "external_sources": "Concluding Observations of the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women on the Czech Republic of 22 October 2010 (CEDAW\/C\/CZE\/CO\/5)", "conclusion": "No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Ale\u0161 Pejchal;Andr\u00e1s Saj\u00f3;Andr\u00e9 Potocki;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Dmitry Dedov;Egidijus K\u016bris;Ganna Yudkivska;George Nicolaou;Guido Raimondi;Helen Keller;Helena J\u00e4derblom;Jon Fridrik Kj\u00f8lbro;Julia Laffranque;Kristina Pardalos;Luis L\u00f3pez Guerra;Mark Villiger;Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska;Paul Lemmens;S\u00edofra O'Leary", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1115JUD002885911" }, "379": { "webcast_id": "2885911_10092013", "hearing_date": "2013-09-10 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Dubsk\u00e1 and Krejzov\u00e1 v. the Czech Republic (nos. 28859\/11 and 28473\/12 )", "hearing_type": "Chamber hearing", "appno": "28473\/12", "case_id": "001-148632", "case_name": "CASE OF DUBSK\u00c1 AND KREJZOV\u00c1 v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-148632", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2014-12-11 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 2, "court": "23", "issue": "Medical Services Act", "represented_by": "ZAHUMENSKY D. ; HOREJSI R.", "respondent": "CZE", "articles": "8;8-1;8-2;35", "strasbourg_caselaw": "A, B and C v. Ireland [GC], no. 25579\/05, 16 December 2010;Connors v. the United Kingdom, no. 66746\/01, \u00a7 82, 27 May 2004;Dickson v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 44362\/04, \u00a7 66, ECHR 2007-V;Evans v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 6339\/05, \u00a7 71, ECHR 2007 I;Haas v. Switzerland, no. 31322\/07, \u00a7 50, 20 January 2011;Haase v. Germany, no. 11057\/02, \u00a7 93, ECHR 2004 III (extracts);Odi\u00e8vre v. France, [GC], no. 42326\/98, \u00a7 29, ECHR 2003 III;Pretty v. the United Kingdom, no. 2346\/02, \u00a7 61, ECHR 2002 III;Stubing v. Germany, no. 43547\/08, \u00a7 60, 12 April 2012;Tysi\u0105c v. Poland, no. 5410\/03, \u00a7 107, ECHR 2007 I", "external_sources": "Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women\u2019s Concluding Observations on the Czech Republic of 22 October 2010 (CEDAW\/C\/CZE\/CO\/5)", "conclusion": "No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Ale\u0161 Pejchal;Andr\u00e9 Potocki;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Ganna Yudkivska;Mark Villiger;Paul Lemmens", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1211JUD002885911" }, "380": { "webcast_id": "2885911_10092013", "hearing_date": "2013-09-10 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Dubsk\u00e1 and Krejzov\u00e1 v. the Czech Republic (nos. 28859\/11 and 28473\/12 )", "hearing_type": "Chamber hearing", "appno": "28473\/12", "case_id": "001-113346", "case_name": "KREJZOV\u00c1 v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-113346", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "2012-09-03 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "HOREJSI R.", "respondent": "CZE", "articles": "8;8-1;14", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Communicated", "separate_opinion": "FALSE", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "381": { "webcast_id": "4784808_04092013", "hearing_date": "2013-09-04 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Center for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin C\u00e2mpeanu v. Romania (no. 47848\/08)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber Judgment hearing", "appno": "47848\/08", "case_id": "001-145577", "case_name": "CASE OF CENTRE FOR LEGAL RESOURCES ON BEHALF OF VALENTIN C\u00c2MPEANU v. ROMANIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-145577", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2014-07-17 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Law no. 487\/2002 on Mental Health and the Protection of People with Psychological Disorders (\u201cthe Mental Health Act 2002\u201d)", "represented_by": "COJOCARIU C.", "respondent": "ROU", "articles": "2;2-1;13;13+2;34;46;46-2", "strasbourg_caselaw": "A. and Others v. Turkey, no. 30015\/96, \u00a7\u00a7 44-45, 27 July 2004;Abd\u00fclsamet Yaman v. Turkey, no. 32446\/96, \u00a7 43, 2 November 2004;Ahmet Y\u0131ld\u0131r\u0131m v. Turkey, no. 3111\/10, \u00a7 72, ECHR 2012;Aizpurua Ortiz and Others v. Spain, no. 42430\/05, \u00a7 30, 2 February 2010;Aliev v. Georgia, no. 522\/04, \u00a7\u00a7 44-49, 13 January 2009;Armonien\u0117 v. Lithuania, no. 36919\/02, \u00a7 29, 25 November 2008;Artico v. Italy, 13 May 1980, \u00a7 33, Series A no. 37;B. v. Romania (no. 2), no. 1285\/03, 19 February 2013;Bazorkina v. Russia (dec.), no. 69481\/01, 15 September 2005;Bi\u00e7 and Others v. Turkey, no. 55955\/00, \u00a7\u00a7 22-23, 2 February 2006;Brudnicka and Others v. Poland, no. 54723\/00, \u00a7\u00a7 27-31, ECHR 2005 II;Brum\u0103rescu v. Romania (just satisfaction) [GC], no. 28342\/95, \u00a7 20, ECHR 2001 I;Burden v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 13378\/05, \u00a7 33, ECHR 2008;C.B. v. Romania, no. 21207\/03, \u00a7\u00a7 65-67, 20 April 2010;\u00c7ak\u0131c\u0131 v. Turkey [GC], no. 23657\/94, \u00a7 92, ECHR 1999 IV;Calvelli and Ciglio v. Italy [GC], no. 32967\/96, \u00a7 49, ECHR 2002 I;Carabulea v. Romania, no. 45661\/99, \u00a7 108, 13 July 2010;Dalban v. Romania [GC], no. 28114\/95, ECHR 1999 VI;De Wilde, Ooms and Versyp v. Belgium, 18 June 1971, \u00a7 76, Series A no. 12;Dodov v. Bulgaria, no. 59548\/00, 17 January 2008;Dvo\u0159\u00e1\u010dek and Dvo\u0159\u00e1\u010dkov\u00e1 v. Slovakia, no. 30754\/04, \u00a7 41, 28 July 2009;Fairfield and Others v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 24790\/04, ECHR 2005 VI;Golder v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1975, Series A no. 18;Gr\u0103dinar v. Moldova, no. 7170\/02, 8 April 2008;Ilbeyi Kemalo\u011flu and Meriye Kemalo\u011flu v. Turkey, no. 19986\/06, \u00a7 35, 10 April 2012;\u0130lhan v. Turkey [GC], no. 22277\/93, ECHR 2000 VII;Ireland v. the United Kingdom, 18 January 1978, Series A no. 25;Jasinskis v. Latvia, no. 45744\/08, \u00a759, 21 December 2010;Kaburov v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 9035\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 52-53, 19 June 2012;Kamil Uzun v. Turkey, no. 37410\/97, \u00a7 64, 10 May 2007;Karner v. Austria, no. 40016\/98, ECHR 2003 IX;Kaya and Polat v. Turkey (dec.), nos. 2794\/05 and 40345\/05, 21 October 2008;Klass and Others v. Germany, 6 September 1978, \u00a7 33, Series A no. 28;Konstantin Markin v. Russia [GC], no. 30078\/06, \u00a7 89, ECHR 2012;L.C.B. v. the United Kingdom, 9 June 1998, \u00a7 36, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 III;L\u00e9ger v. France (striking out) [GC], no. 19324\/02, \u00a7 50, 30 March 2009;M.P. and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 22457\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 96-100, 15 November 2011;Malhous v. the Czech Republic (dec.), no. 33071\/96, ECHR 2000 XII;Marie-Louise Loyen and Bruneel v. France, no. 55929\/00, 5 July 2005;Mehmet Hatip Dicle v. Turkey, no. 9858\/04, \u00a7 41, 15 October 2013;Mente\u015f and Others v. Turkey, 28 November 1997, \u00a7 107, Reports 1997 VIII;Micallef v. Malta [GC], no. 17056\/06, ECHR 2009;Monnat v. Switzerland, no. 73604\/01, \u00a7\u00a7 31-32, ECHR 2006-X;Nencheva and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 48609\/06, 18 June 2013;Nikolova and Velichkova v. Bulgaria, no. 7888\/03, \u00a7 57, 20 December 2007;N\u00f6lkenbockhoff v. Germany, no. 10300\/83, \u00a7 33, 25 August 1987;\u00d6nery\u0131ld\u0131z v. Turkey [GC], no. 48939\/99, \u00a7 71, ECHR 2004 XII;Orhan v. Turkey, no. 25656\/94, \u00a7 264, 18 June 2002, \u00a7 264;P., C. and S. v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 56547\/00, 11 December 2001;P., C. and S. v. the United Kingdom, no. 56547\/00, ECHR 2002 VI;Parascineti v. Romania, no. 32060\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 34-38, 13 March 2012,;Paul and Audrey Edwards v. the United Kingdom, no. 46477\/99, \u00a7\u00a7 96-97, ECHR 2002 II;Polanco Torres and Movilla Polanco v. Spain, no. 34147\/06, 21 September 2010;Post v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 21727\/08, 20 January 2009;Raimondo v. Italy, 22 February 1994, \u00a7 2, Series A no. 281 A;Ressegatti v. Switzerland, no. 17671\/02, 13 July 2006;S.P., D.P. and A.T. v. the United Kingdom, no. 23715\/94, Commission decision of 20 May 1996;Sanles Sanles v. Spain (dec.), no. 48335\/99, ECHR 2000 XI;Scozzari and Giunta v. Italy [GC], nos. 39221\/98 and 41963\/98, \u00a7 249, ECHR 2000 VIII;Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803\/94, \u00a7 87, ECHR 1999 V;Stojkovic v. \u201cthe former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia\u201d, no. 14818\/02, \u00a7 25, 8 November 2007;Tauira and 18 Others v. France, application no. 28204\/95, Commission decision of 4 December 1995, Decisions and Reports (DR) 83-B, p. 131;The Arge\u015f College of Legal Advisers v. Romania, no. 2162\/05, 8 March 2011;The Georgian Labour Party v. Georgia (dec.), no. 9103\/04, 22 May 2007;Th\u00e9venon v. France (dec.), no. 2476\/02, ECHR 200 \u2013III;Timus and Tarus v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 70077\/11, \u00a7 58, 15 October 2013;Varnava and Others v. Turkey [GC], nos. 16064\/90, 16065\/90, 16066\/90, 16068\/90, 16069\/90, 16070\/90, 16071\/90, 16072\/90 and 16073\/90, ECHR 2009;Velcea and Maz\u0103re v. Romania, no. 64301\/01, \u00a7 138, 1 December 2009;Velikova v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 41488\/98, 18 May 1999;Villa v. Italy, no. 19675\/06, \u00a7 55, 20 April 2010;Vlad and Others v. Romania, nos. 40756\/06, 41508\/07 and 50806\/07, \u00a7 162, 26 November 2013;Vo v. France [GC], no. 53924\/00, \u00a7\u00a7 89 90, ECHR 2004 VIII;Winterwerp v. the Netherlands, 24 October 1979, \u00a7 60, Series A no. 33;Women On Waves and Others v. Portugal, no. 31276\/05, \u00a7 47, 3 February 2009;X v. France, no. 18020\/91, \u00a7 26, 31 March 1992;Y.F. v. Turkey, no. 24209\/94, \u00a7 29, ECHR 2003\u2013IX;Ya\u015fa v. Turkey, 2 September 1998, \u00a7 127, Reports 1998 VI;Z and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 29392\/95, ECHR 2001 V", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Preliminary objection dismissed (Article 34 - Locus standi);Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2 - Positive obligations;Article 2-1 - Life) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Violation of Article 13+2 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 2 - Right to life);Respondent State to take measures of a general character (Article 46-2 - Measures of a general character)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Alvina Gyulumyan;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Dean Spielmann;Guido Raimondi;Ineta Ziemele;J\u00e1n \u0160ikuta;Johannes Silvis;Kristina Pardalos;Ledi Bianku;Luis L\u00f3pez Guerra;Nona Tsotsoria;P\u00e4ivi Hirvel\u00e4;Paul Mahoney;Paulo Pinto De Albuquerque;Vincent A. De Gaetano", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0717JUD004784808" }, "382": { "webcast_id": "4784808_04092013", "hearing_date": "2013-09-04 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Center for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin C\u00e2mpeanu v. Romania (no. 47848\/08)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber Judgment hearing", "appno": "47848\/08", "case_id": "001-113736", "case_name": "CENTER OF LEGAL RESOURCES ON BEHALF OF VALENTIN CAMPEANU v. ROMANIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-113736", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "2011-06-07 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "N\/A", "respondent": "ROU", "articles": "2;3;5;8;13;13+2;13+3;13+8;14;14+2;14+3;14+5", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Communicated", "separate_opinion": "FALSE", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "383": { "webcast_id": "6064208_10072013", "hearing_date": "2013-07-10 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Ali\u0161i\u0107 and Others v. Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Serbia, Slovenia and \u201cthe Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia\u201d (no. 60642\/08)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "60642\/08", "case_id": "001-145575", "case_name": "CASE OF ALI\u0160I\u0106 AND OTHERS v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA, CROATIA, SERBIA, SLOVENIA AND \"THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA\"", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-145575", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2014-07-16 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "1991 Constitutional Act of Slovenia, as amended in 1994 ; Succession Fund of the Republic of Slovenia Act 1993, as amended in 1997 ; Old Foreign-Currency Savings Act 2002 of Serbia ; Section 2 of the Old Foreign-Currency Savings Act 2006 of Bosnia and Herzegovina ; Section 23 of the Succession Fund and the Senior Representative for Succession of the Republic of Slovenia Act 2006\n", "represented_by": "MUJCIN B.", "respondent": "BIH;HRV;MKD;SRB;SVN", "articles": "13;35;35-3;41;46;P1-1;P1-1-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "A. and B. v. Montenegro, no. 37571\/05, \u00a7 68, 5 March 2013;Anokhin v. Russia (dec.), no. 25867\/02, 31 May 2007;Beyeler v. Italy [GC], no. 33202\/96, \u00a7 106, ECHR 2000 I;Boyajyan v. Armenia, no. 38003\/04, \u00a7 54, 22 March 2011;Broniowski v. Poland [GC], no. 31443\/96, ECHR 2004 V;Burdov v. Russia (no. 2), no. 33509\/04, \u00a7 127, ECHR 2009;Cooperativa Agricola Slobozia-Hanesei v. Moldova, no. 39745\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 17-19, 3 April 2007;E.G. v. Poland (dec.), no. 50425\/99, \u00a7 28, ECHR 2008;Gayduk and Others v. Ukraine (dec.), no. 45526\/99, decision of 2 July 2002;Hutten-Czapska v. Poland [GC], no. 35014\/97, \u00a7 248, ECHR 2006 VIII;Iatridis v. Greece [GC], no. 31107\/96, \u00a7 55, ECHR 1999-II;Immobiliare Saffi v. Italy [GC], no. 22774\/93, ECHR 1999 V;Khachatryan v. Armenia, \u00a7\u00a7 51-55, no. 31761\/04, 1 December 2009;Kotov v. Russia [GC], no. 54522\/00, 3 April 2012;Kud\u0142a v. Poland [GC], no. 30210\/96, \u00a7 157, ECHR 2000 XI;Kuri\u0107 and Others v. Slovenia (just satisfaction) [GC], no. 26828\/06, \u00a7 136, ECHR 2014;Likvid\u0113jam\u0101 p\/s Selga and Vasi\u013cevska v. Latvia (dec.), nos. 17126\/02 and 24991\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 94-113, 1 October 2013;Lukenda v. Slovenia, no. 23032\/02, \u00a7 94, ECHR 2005 X;Merzhoyev v. Russia, no. 68444\/01, 8 October 2009;Mykhaylenky and Others v. Ukraine, nos. 35091\/02 et al., \u00a7\u00a7 43-46, ECHR 2004 XII;Nejdet \u015eahin and Perihan \u015eahin v. Turkey [GC], no. 13279\/05, \u00a7 49, 20 October 2011;Odi\u00e8vre v. France [GC], no. 42326\/98, \u00a7 22, ECHR 2003 III;Paksas v. Lithuania [GC], no. 34932\/04, \u00a7 114, ECHR 2011;R. Ka\u010dapor and Others v. Serbia, nos. 2269\/06, 3041\/06, 3042\/06, 3043\/06, 3045\/06 and 3046\/06, 15 January 2008;Roche v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 32555\/96, \u00a7 137, ECHR 2005 X;Sejdi\u0107 and Finci v. Bosnia and Herzegovina [GC], nos. 27996\/06 and 34836\/06, \u00a7 60, ECHR 2009;Sporrong and L\u00f6nnroth v. Sweden, 23 September 1982, \u00a7 61, Series A no. 52;Suljagi\u0107 v. Bosnia and Herzegovina, no. 27912\/02, 3 November 2009;Visti\u0146\u0161 and Perepjolkins v. Latvia [GC], no. 71243\/01, \u00a7 93, 25 October 2012;Vu\u010dkovi\u0107 and Others v. Serbia [GC], no. 17153\/11, \u00a7 80, 25 March 2014;Waite and Kennedy v. Germany [GC], no. 26083\/94, \u00a7 54, ECHR 1999 I;Wolkenberg and Others v. Poland (dec.), no. 50003\/99, \u00a7 34, ECHR 2007 XIV;Yershova v. Russia, no. 1387\/04, \u00a7\u00a7 54-63, 8 April 2010;Zastava It Turs v. Serbia (dec.), no. 24922\/12, \u00a7\u00a7 19-23, 9 April 2013;Zolotas v. Greece (no. 2), no. 66610\/09, ECHR 2013", "external_sources": "2001 Resolution on State Succession in Matters of Property and Debts of the Institute of International Law", "conclusion": "Preliminary objections dismissed (Article 35-3 - Ratione materiae);Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions) (Serbia);Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions) (Slovenia);No violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions) (Bosnia and Herzegovina) (Croatia) (the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia);Violation of Article 13 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Serbia);Violation of Article 13 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Slovenia);No violation of Article 13 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Bosnia and Herzegovina) (Croatia) (the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia);Respondent State to take measures of a general character (Article 46 - Pilot judgment;Systemic problem;General measures) (Serbia);Respondent State to take measures of a general character (Article 46 - Pilot judgment;Systemic problem;General measures) (Slovenia);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed;Non-pecuniary damage - award", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Andr\u00e9 Potocki;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Dean Spielmann;Ganna Yudkivska;Guido Raimondi;Ineta Ziemele;Josep Casadevall;Lech Garlicki;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Mark Villiger;Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska;Nicolas Bratza;P\u00e4ivi Hirvel\u00e4;Ksenija Turkovi\u0107", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0716JUD006064208" }, "384": { "webcast_id": "6064208_10072013", "hearing_date": "2013-07-10 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Ali\u0161i\u0107 and Others v. Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Serbia, Slovenia and \u201cthe Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia\u201d (no. 60642\/08)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "60642\/08", "case_id": "001-114243", "case_name": "CASE OF ALI\u0160I\u0106 AND OTHERS v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA, CROATIA, SERBIA, SLOVENIA AND \"THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA\"", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-114243", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2012-11-06 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 3, "court": "7", "issue": "Agreement on Succession Issues ; Section 24 of the Constitutional Court Act 2007", "represented_by": "MUJCIN B.", "respondent": "BIH;HRV;MKD;SRB;SVN", "articles": "13;35;35-1;41;46;P1-1;P1-1-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Babylonov\u00e1 v. Slovakia, no. 69146\/01, \u00a7 44, ECHR 2006-VIII;Baumann v. France, no. 33592\/96, \u00a7 47, ECHR 2001-V;Broniowski v. Poland [GC], no. 31443\/96, \u00a7\u00a7 189-94, ECHR 2004-V;Burdov v. Russia (no. 2), no. 33509\/04, \u00a7 127, ECHR 2009;Demopoulos and Others v. Turkey (dec.) [GC], nos. 46113\/99, 3843\/02, 13751\/02, 13466\/03, 10200\/04, 14163\/04, 19993\/04 and 21819\/04, \u00a7 98, ECHR 2010;E.G. v. Poland (dec.), no. 50425\/99, \u00a7 28, ECHR 2008;Iatridis v. Greece [GC], no. 31107\/96, \u00a7 55, ECHR 1999-II;Immobiliare Saffi v. Italy [GC], no. 22774\/93, \u00a7 69, ECHR 1999-V;Kovacic and Others v. Slovenia [GC], nos. 44574\/98, 45133\/98 and 48316\/99, \u00a7 265, 3 October 2008;Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210\/96, \u00a7 157, ECHR 2000-XI;Lukenda v. Slovenia, no. 23032\/02, \u00a7 94, ECHR 2005-X;Mykhaylenky and Others v. Ukraine, nos. 35091\/02 et al., \u00a7 43-45, ECHR 2004-XII;R. Kacapor and Others v. Serbia, nos. 2269\/06 et al., \u00a7\u00a7 97-98, 15 January 2008;Ra\u0161kovic and Milunovic v. Serbia, nos. 1789\/07 and 28058\/07, \u00a7 71, 31 May 2011;\u0160ekerovic v. Serbia (dec.), no. 32472\/03, 4 January 2006;Suljagic v. Bosnia and Herzegovina, no. 27912\/02, 3 November 2009;Trajkovski v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (dec.), no. 53320\/99, ECHR 2002-IV;Wolkenberg and Others v. Poland (dec.), no. 50003\/99, \u00a7 34, ECHR 2007-XIV", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Preliminary objection dismissed (Article 35-1 - Exhaustion of domestic remedies);Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions) (Serbia);Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions) (Slovenia);No violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions) (Bosnia and Herzegovina) (Croatia) (the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia);Violation of Article 13 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Serbia);Violation of Article 13 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Slovenia);No violation of Article 13 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Bosnia and Herzegovina) (Croatia) (the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia);Respondent State to take measures of a general character (Article 46 - Pilot judgment;Systemic problem;General measures);Respondent State to take measures of a general character (Article 46 - Pilot judgment;Systemic problem;General measures);Non-pecuniary damage - award", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Lech Garlicki;Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska;Nicolas Bratza", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1106JUD006064208" }, "385": { "webcast_id": "6064208_10072013", "hearing_date": "2013-07-10 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Ali\u0161i\u0107 and Others v. Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Serbia, Slovenia and \u201cthe Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia\u201d (no. 60642\/08)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "60642\/08", "case_id": "001-113039", "case_name": "ALISIC AND OTHERS v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA, CROATIA, SERBIA, SLOVENIA AND \"THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA\"", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-113039", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "2010-02-23 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "MUJCIN B.", "respondent": "BIH", "articles": "13;14;P1-1;P1-1-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Communicated", "separate_opinion": "FALSE", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "386": { "webcast_id": "6064208_10072013", "hearing_date": "2013-07-10 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Ali\u0161i\u0107 and Others v. Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Serbia, Slovenia and \u201cthe Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia\u201d (no. 60642\/08)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "60642\/08", "case_id": "001-107425", "case_name": "ALI\u0160I\u0106 AND OTHERS v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA, CROATIA, SERBIA, SLOVENIA AND \"THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA\"", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-107425", "type": "DECISIONS", "typedescription": 8, "document_date": "", "collection": "CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG", "importance": 2, "court": "7", "issue": "the 1978 SFRY Civil Obligations Act ; section 6 of the SFRY Legislation Application Act 1992, 3(1) of the Claims Settlement Act 1997, the Non-Residents\u2019 Claims Settlement Decree 1999, section 9(2) of the Settlement of Domestic Debt Act 2004 and section 2 of the Old Foreign-Currency Savings Act 2006 (Bosnia and Herzegovina) ; section 14 of the Old Foreign-Currency Savings Act 1993 (Croatia) ; sections 21 and 36 of the Old Foreign-Currency Savings Act 2002, section 18 of the Banks and Other Financial Institutions Insolvency Act 1989 and section 135 of the Foreign-Currency Transactions Act 1995 (Serbia) ; section 1 of the Old Foreign-Currency Savings Act 1993 (Slovenia)", "represented_by": "MUJCIN B.", "respondent": "BIH;HRV;MKD;SRB;SVN", "articles": "35;35-1;35-3", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Anheuser-Busch Inc. v. Portugal [GC], no. 73049\/01, \u00a7 63, ECHR 2007-I;Babylonov\u00e1 v. Slovakia, no. 69146\/01, \u00a7 44, ECHR 2006-VIII;Baumann v. France, no. 33592\/96, \u00a7 47, ECHR 2001-V;Blecic v. Croatia [GC], no. 59532\/00, \u00a7 67, ECHR 2006-III;\nKovacic and Others v. Slovenia [GC], nos. 44574\/98, 45133\/98 and 48316\/99, \u00a7\u00a7 36, 39 and 265, ECHR 2008-...;Molnar Gabor v. Serbia, no. 22762\/05, 8 December 2009;Suljagic v. Bosnia and Herzegovina, no. 27912\/02, 3 November 2009;T. v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 24724\/94, \u00a7 55, 16 December 1999;Appolonov v. Russia (dec.), no. 67578\/01, 29 August 2002;Bata v. the Czech Republic (dec.), no. 43775\/05, 24 June 2008;Broniowski v. Poland (dec.) [GC], no. 31443\/96, \u00a7\u00a7 74 and 86, ECHR 2002-X;Gayduk and Others v. Ukraine (dec.), nos. 45526\/99, 46099\/99, 47088\/99, 47176\/99, 47177\/99, 48018\/99, 48043\/99, 48071\/99, 48580\/99, 48624\/99, 49426\/99, 50354\/99, 51934\/99, 51938\/99, 53423\/99, 53424\/99, 54120\/00, 54124\/00, 54136\/00, 55542\/00 and 56019\/00, ECHR 2002-VI;\nKireev v. Moldova and Russia (dec.), no. 11375\/05, 1 July 2008;Rudzinska v. Poland (dec.), no. 45223\/99, ECHR 1999-VI;Slivenko and Others v. Latvia (dec.) [GC], no. 48321\/99, \u00a7 121, ECHR 2002-II;Trajkovski v. \u201cthe former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia\u201d (dec.), no. 53320\/99, ECHR 2002-IV;Vi\u0161njevac v. Bosnia and Herzegovina (dec.), no. 2333\/04, 24 October 2006;S.C. v. France (no. 20944\/92, Commission decision of 20 February 1995, DR 80, p. 78), and Abraini Leschi and Others v. France (no. 37505\/97, Commission decision of 22 April 1998, DR 93, p. 120;X, Y and Z v. Germany (no. 7694\/76, Commission decision of 14 October 1977, Decisions and Reports (DR) 12, p. 131)", "external_sources": "1978 Vienna Convention on Succession of States in respect of Treaties;the 1983 Vienna Convention on Succession of States in respect of State Property, Archives and Debts;judgment of the International Court of Justice in the North Sea Continental Shelf Cases of 20 February 1969;Opinion Nos. 9, 12 and 13 of the Badinter Commission;Article 6, 8, 9 and 23 of the 2001 Guiding Principles on State Succession in Matters of Property and Debts of the Institute of International Law", "conclusion": "Preliminary objections joined to the merits (non-exhaustion of domestic remedies);Admissible", "separate_opinion": "", "judges": "Lech Garlicki;Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska;Nicolas Bratza", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1017DEC006064208" }, "387": { "webcast_id": "445510_26062013", "hearing_date": "2013-06-26 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Margu\u0161 v. Croatia (no. 4455\/10)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "4455\/10", "case_id": "001-144276", "case_name": "CASE OF MARGU\u0160 v. CROATIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-144276", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2014-05-27 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "General Amnesty Act of 24 September 1996 (Official Gazette no. 80\/1996, Zakon o op\u0107em oprostu) ", "represented_by": "SABOLIC P.", "respondent": "HRV", "articles": "2;3;6;6-1;6-3-c;35;35-3;P7-4", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Abd\u00fclsamet Yaman v. Turkey, no. 32446\/96, \u00a7 55, 2 November 2004;Al-Adsani v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 35763\/97, \u00a7 55, ECHR 2001-XI;Andronicou and Constantinou v. Cyprus, 9 October 1997, \u00a7 171, Reports 1997-VI;Austin and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 39692\/09, 40713\/09 and 41008\/09, \u00a7 54, ECHR 2012;Craxi III v. Italy (dec.), no. 63226\/00, 14 June 2001;Demir and Baykara v. Turkey [GC], no. 34503\/97, \u00a7 67, ECHR 2008;Diennet v. France, 26 September 1995, Series A no. 325 A, \u00a7 38;Egmez v. Cyprus, no. 30873\/96, \u00a7 71, ECHR 2000-XII;El Masri v. \u201cthe former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia\u201d [GC], no. 39630\/09, \u00a7 182, ECHR 2012;Ferrantelli and Santangelo v. Italy, 7 August 1996, \u00a7 59, Reports 1996 III;Gradinger v. Austria, 19 May 1994, opinion of the Commission, \u00a7\u00a7 67-69, Series A, no. 328-C;Harutyunyan v. Armenia (dec.), no. 34334\/04, 7 December 2006;Hauschildt v. Denmark, 24 May 1989, \u00a7 50, Series A no. 154;Kaya v. Turkey, 19 February 1998, \u00a7 86, Reports 1998-I;McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, 27 September 1995, Series A no. 324;Nada v. Switzerland [GC], no. 10593\/08, \u00a7 169, ECHR 2012;Okkal\u0131 v. Turkey, no 52067\/99, \u00a7 76, 17 October 2006;Ould Dah v. France (dec.), no. 13113\/03, ECHR 2009;Rantsev v. Cyprus and Russia, no. 25965\/04, \u00a7\u00a7 273-74, ECHR 2010 (extracts);Ringeisen v. Austria, 16 July 1971, Series A no. 13, \u00a7 97;Romero Martin v. Spain (dec.), no. 32045\/03, 12 June 2006;Saadi v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 13229\/03, \u00a7 62, ECHR 2008;Sergey Zolotukhin v. Russia [GC], no. 14939\/03, \u00a7 82, ECHR 2009;Smirnova and Smirnova v. Russia (dec.), nos. 46133\/99 and 48183\/99, 3 October 2002;Solomou and Others v. Turkey, no. 36832\/97, \u00a7 63, 24 June 2008;Stec and Others v. the United Kingdom (dec.) [GC], nos. 65731\/01 and 65900\/01, \u00a7 48, ECHR 2005-X;Thomann v. Switzerland, 10 June 1996, \u00a7\u00a7 35-36, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 III;Turan Cakir v. Belgium, no. 44256\/06, \u00a7 69, 10 March 2009;Vaillant v. France, no. 30609\/04, \u00a7\u00a7 29-35, 18 December 2008;Ye\u015fil and Sevim v. Turkey, no. 34738\/04, \u00a7 38, 5 June 2007", "external_sources": "International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, Furund\u017eija case, judgment of 10 December 1998;UN Human Rights Committee, General Comment 20, Article 7 (Forty-fourth session, 1992);UN Human Rights Committee, Concluding observations, Lebanon, 1 April 1997;UN Human Rights Committee, General Comment No. 31 [80], The Nature of the General Legal Obligation Imposed on States Parties to the Covenant, 26 May 2004;Article 31 \u00a7 3 (c) of the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties;Article 6 \u00a7 5 of the second Additional Protocol to the Geneva Conventions, relating to the protection of victims of non-international conflicts;Inter-American Court of Human Rights, Gomes Lund v. Brazil (judgment of 24 November 2010, Preliminary Objections, Merits, Reparations and Costs);Inter-American Court of Human Rights, The Massacres of El Mozote and Nearby Places v. El Salvador;1949 Geneva Conventions Relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War;Article V of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide;Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment;Convention on the Non-Applicability of Statutory Limitations to War Crimes and Crimes against Humanity;Article 20 of the Statute of the International Criminal Court;International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights;European Parliament, Resolution A3-0056\/93, 12 March 1993;Fifth report, UN Doc. E\/CN.4\/1998\/38, 24 December 1997;Article 1 of the American Convention on Human Rights;Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, Case 10.287 (El Salvador), Report of 24 September 1992, Report on the situation of human rights in El Salvador, Doc. OEA\/Ser.L\/II.85 Doc. 28 rev. (1 June 1994) and Case 10.480 (El Salvador), Report of 27 January 1999\n", "conclusion": "Preliminary objection dismissed (Article 35-3 - Ratione temporis);Remainder inadmissible;No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Impartial tribunal);No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing;Article 6-3-c - Defence in person)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Anatoly Kovler;Andr\u00e9 Potocki;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Ann Power-Forde;Corneliu B\u00eersan;Dean Spielmann;Dmitry Dedov;Elisabeth Steiner;Erik M\u00f8se;Guido Raimondi;Helena J\u00e4derblom;Ineta Ziemele;Isabelle Berro-Lef\u00e8vre;J\u00e1n \u0160ikuta;Josep Casadevall;Khanlar Hajiyev;Kristina Pardalos;Krzysztof Wojtyczek;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Mark Villiger;Neboj\u0161a Vu\u010dini\u0107;Peer Lorenzen;Zdravka Kalaydjieva;Ksenija Turkovi\u0107", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0527JUD000445510" }, "388": { "webcast_id": "445510_26062013", "hearing_date": "2013-06-26 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Margu\u0161 v. Croatia (no. 4455\/10)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "4455\/10", "case_id": "001-114487", "case_name": "CASE OF MARGU\u0160 v. CROATIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-114487", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2012-11-13 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 3, "court": "4", "issue": "General Amnesty Act of 24 September 1996", "represented_by": "SABOLIC P.", "respondent": "HRV", "articles": "6;6-1;6-3-c;P7-4", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Abd\u00fclsamet Yaman v. Turkey, no. 32446\/96, \u00a7 55, 2 November 2004;Balliu v. Albania, no. 74727\/01, \u00a7 25, 16 June 2005;De Cubber v. Belgium, 26 October 1984, \u00a7 26, Series A no. 86;Egmez v. Cyprus, no. 30873\/96, \u00a7 71, ECHR 2000-XII;Ferrantelli and Santangelo v. Italy, 7 August 1996, \u00a7 58, Reports 1996-III;Gautrin and Others v. France, \u00a7 58, 20 May 1998, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-III;Imbrioscia v. Switzerland, 24 November 1993, Series A no. 275, \u00a7 38;Me\u017enaric v. Croatia, no. 71615\/01, \u00a7 32, 15 July 2005;Micallef v. Malta, no. 17056\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 74-75, 15 January 2008;Okkali v. Turkey, no 52067\/99, \u00a7 76, 17 October 2006;Ould Dah v. France (dec.), no. 13113\/03, ECHR 2009;S.N. v. Sweden, no. 34209\/96, \u00a7 43, ECHR 2002-V;Sergey Zolotukhin v. Russia [GC], no. 14939\/03, \u00a7 82, ECHR 2009;Turan Cakir v. Belgium, no. 44256\/06, \u00a7 69, 10 March 2009;Vanyan v. Russia, no. 53203\/99, \u00a7 63-68, 15 December 2005;Wettstein v. Switzerland, no. 33958\/96, \u00a7\u00a7 43-44, ECHR 2000-XII;Yesil and Sevim v. Turkey, no. 34738\/04, \u00a7 38, 5 June 2007", "external_sources": "Article 3 \u00a7 1 of the Fourth Geneva Convention;Article 4 \u00a7\u00a7 1, 2(a) and 13 of the Additional Protocol to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II) of 8 June 1977", "conclusion": "No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Impartial tribunal);No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing);No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6-3-c - Defence in person);No violation of Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 - Right not to be tried or punished twice-{general} (Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 - Acquittal;Conviction)", "separate_opinion": "FALSE", "judges": "Anatoly Kovler;Elisabeth Steiner;Erik M\u00f8se;Khanlar Hajiyev;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Peer Lorenzen", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1113JUD000445510" }, "389": { "webcast_id": "1715311_15052013", "hearing_date": "2013-05-15 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Vu\u010dkovi\u0107 and Others v. Serbia (no. 17153\/11)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "17153\/11", "case_id": "001-142199", "case_name": "CASE OF VU\u010cKOVI\u0106 AND OTHERS v. SERBIA ", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-142199", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 16, "document_date": "2014-03-25 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 2, "court": "8", "issue": "Sections 199, 200, 371 and 376 \u00a7\u00a7 1-2 of the Obligations Act ; Rules on Travel and Other Expenses in the Yugoslav Army ; Articles 18, 21, 32 and 36 of the Constitution; Section 43 of the Prohibition of Discrimination Act", "represented_by": "ALEKSIC S. ; ISAILOVIC B. ", "respondent": "SRB", "articles": "35;35-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "A, B and C v. Ireland [GC], no. 25579\/05, \u00a7 142, ECHR 2010;Akdivar and Others v. Turkey, 16 September 1996, Reports 1996 IV;An\u0111elkovi\u0107 v. Serbia, no. 1401\/08, \u00a7 24, 9 April 2013;Azinas v. Cyprus [GC], no. 56679\/00, \u00a7 32, ECHR 2004 III;Balogh v. Hungary, no. 47940\/99, \u00a7 30, 20 July 2004;Burden v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 13378\/05, \u00a7 42, ECHR 2008;Cardot v. France, 19 March 1991, \u00a7 34, Series A no. 200;Castells v. Spain, 23 April 1992, \u00a7 32, Series A no. 236;D v. Ireland (dec.), no. 26499\/02, \u00a7 85, 28 June 2006;D.H. and Others v. the Czech Republic [GC], no. 57325\/00, \u00a7\u00a7 117 and 118, ECHR 2007 IV;Demopoulos and Others v. Turkey (dec.) [GC], nos. 46113\/99, 3843\/02, 13751\/02, 13466\/03, 10200\/04, 14163\/04, 19993\/04 and 21819\/04, \u00a7 69, ECHR 2010;Fressoz and Roire v. France [GC], no. 29183\/95, \u00a7 37, ECHR 1999 I;G\u00e4fgen v. Germany [GC], no. 22978\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 144 and 146, ECHR 2010;Hajnal v. Serbia, no. 36937\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 122 and 123, 19 June 2012;K. and T. v. Finland [GC], no. 25702\/94, \u00a7\u00a7 140-41, ECHR 2001-VII;McFarlane v. Ireland [GC], no. 31333\/06, \u00a7 107, 10 September 2010;Odi\u00e8vre v. France [GC], no. 42326\/98, \u00a7 22, ECHR 2003-III;P\u00e9rez de Rada Cavanilles v. Spain, 28 October 1998, \u00a7 43;Perna v. Italy [GC], no. 48898\/99, \u00a7\u00a7 23-24, ECHR 2003-V;Raki\u0107 and Others v. Serbia, no. 47460\/07 and others, \u00a7 39, 5 October 2010;Ringeisen v. Austria, 16 July 1971, \u00a7 89, Series A no. 13;Scoppola v. Italy (no. 2) [GC], no. 10249\/03, \u00a7 70, 17 September 2009;Sejdovic v. Italy [GC], no. 56581\/00, \u00a7 46, ECHR 2006 II;Thiermann and Others v. Norway (dec.), no. 18712\/03, 8 March 2007;Van Oosterwijck, judgment of 6 November 1980, Series A no. 40, pp. 16-17, \u00a7\u00a7 33-34;Vin\u010di\u0107 and Others v. Serbia, nos. 44698\/06 and others, \u00a7 51, 1 December 2009;Waite and Kennedy v. Germany [GC], no. 26083\/94, \u00a7 54, ECHR 1999 I", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Preliminary objection allowed (Article 35-1 - Effective domestic remedy)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Ale\u0161 Pejchal;Alvina Gyulumyan;Andr\u00e1s Saj\u00f3;David Th\u00f3r Bj\u00f6rgvinsson;Dean Spielmann;Fran\u00e7oise Tulkens;Ganna Yudkivska;Guido Raimondi;Helen Keller;Ineta Ziemele;Isabelle Berro-Lef\u00e8vre;J\u00e1n \u0160ikuta;Josep Casadevall;Khanlar Hajiyev;Kristina Pardalos;Mark Villiger;Nona Tsotsoria;P\u00e4ivi Hirvel\u00e4;Vincent A. De Gaetano;Ksenija Turkovi\u0107", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0325JUD001715311" }, "390": { "webcast_id": "1715311_15052013", "hearing_date": "2013-05-15 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Vu\u010dkovi\u0107 and Others v. Serbia (no. 17153\/11)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "17153\/11", "case_id": "001-112706", "case_name": "CASE OF VU\u010cKOVI\u0106 AND OTHERS v. SERBIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-112706", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2012-08-28 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 3, "court": "5", "issue": "Article 360 \u00a7 3 of the Obligations Act ; Memorandum of 16 March 2009", "represented_by": "ALEKSIC S.", "respondent": "SRB", "articles": "14;14+P1-1;35;35-1;41;46;46-2;P1-1;P1-1-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Adamsons v. Latvia, no. 3669\/03, \u00a7 118, 24 June 2008;Atanasovski v. \u201cthe Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia\u201d, no. 36815\/03, \u00a7 38, 14 January 2010;Balogh v. Hungary, no. 47940\/99, \u00a7 30, 20 July 2004;Beian v. Romania (no. 1), no. 30658\/05, \u00a7 \u2026, ECHR 2007-V (extracts);Belgium\u201d v. Belgium (Merits) (judgment of 23 July 1968, Series A no. 6, \u00a7 9);Burden v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 13378\/05, ECHR 2008-;Carson and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 42184\/05, \u00a7 66, ECHR 2010;D.H. and Others v. the Czech Republic [GC], no. 57325\/00, \u00a7 175, ECHR 2007;Dalia v. France, judgment of 19 February 1998, Reports 1998-I, pp. 87-88, \u00a7 38;Dankevich v. Ukraine, no. 40679\/98, \u00a7 107, 29 April 2003;Garc\u00eda Ruiz v. Spain [GC], no. 30544\/96, \u00a7 28, ECHR 1999-I;Iordan Iordanov and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 23530\/02, \u00a7 49-50, 2 July 2009;Kjeldsen, Busk Madsen and Pedersen v. Denmark, 7 December 1976, \u00a7 56, Series A no. 23;Mifsud v. France (dec.) [GC], no. 57220\/00, \u00a7 15, ECHR 2002-VIII;Nejdet Sahin and Perihan Sahin v. Turkey [GC], no. 13279\/05, 20 October 2011;Paduraru v. Romania, \u00a7 98, no. 63252\/00, ECHR 2005-XII (extracts);Santos Pinto v. Portugal, no. 39005\/04, \u00a7 41, 20 May 2008;Savez crkava \u201cRijec \u017eivota\u201d and Others v. Croatia, no. 7798\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 114 and 115, 9 December 2010;Scozzari and Giunta v. Italy [GC], nos. 39221\/98 and 41963\/98, \u00a7 249, ECHR 2000-VIII;Stefan and Stef v. Romania, nos. 24428\/03 and 26977\/03, \u00a7\u00a7 33-36, 27 January 2009;Stefanica and Others v. Romania, no. 38155\/02, \u00a7 \u2026, 2 November 2010;Tomic and Others v. Montenegro, nos. 18650\/09 and others, \u00a7 57, 17 April 2012, not yet final;Tudor Tudor v. Romania, no. 21911\/03, 24 March 2009;Un\u00e9dic v. France, no. 20153\/04, \u00a7 74, 18 December 2008;Vernillo v. France, judgment of 20 February 1991, Series A no. 198, pp. 11-12, \u00a7 27;Vincic and Others v. Serbia, nos. 44698\/06 and others, 1 December 2009;Willis v. United Kingdom, no. 36042\/97, \u00a7 36, ECHR 2002-IV", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 14+P1-1 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property;Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions);Respondent State to take measures of a general character (Article 46-2 - Measures of a general character);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed;Non-pecuniary damage - claim dismissed", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Andr\u00e1s Saj\u00f3;Fran\u00e7oise Tulkens;Guido Raimondi;Isabelle Berro-Lef\u00e8vre", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0828JUD001715311" }, "391": { "webcast_id": "578608_03042013", "hearing_date": "2013-04-03 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "S\u00f6derman v. Sweden (no. 5786\/08 )", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "5786\/08", "case_id": "001-128043", "case_name": "CASE OF S\u00d6DERMAN v. SWEDEN", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-128043", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2013-11-12 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Tort Liability Act ; Chapter 6, Article 7 \u00a7 3 and Chapter 16, Article 10a of the Penal Code ; Freedom of the Press Act ; Fundamental Law on Freedom of Expression", "represented_by": "SODERGREN J. ; LEWIS K. ; CRAFOORD C.", "respondent": "SWE", "articles": "8;8-1;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "A v. Croatia, no. 55164\/08, \u00a7 60, 14 October 2010;Airey v. Ireland, 9 October 1979, \u00a7 32, Series A no. 32;Al-Jedda v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 27021\/08, \u00a7 117, ECHR 2011;Bevacqua and S. v. Bulgaria, no. 71127\/01, \u00a7 65, 12 June 2008;Brecknell v. the United Kingdom, no. 32457\/04, \u00a7 64, 27 November 2007;C.A.S. and C.S. v. Romania, no. 26692\/05, 20 March 2012;\u0110or\u0111evi\u0107 v. Croatia, no. 41526\/10, \u00a7\u00a7141-43, ECHR 2012;Evans v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 6339\/05, \u00a7 77, ECHR 2007 I;K.U. v. Finland, no. 2872\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 45-49, ECHR 2008-V;M. and C. v. Romania, no. 29032\/04, \u00a7\u00a7 112 et seq., 27 September 2011;M.C. v. Bulgaria, no. 39272\/98, ECHR 2003 XII;M.P. and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 22457\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 109 110, 15 November 2011;Mosley v. the United Kingdom, no. 48009\/08, \u00a7 109, 10 May 2011;Nada v. Switzerland [GC], no. 10593\/08, \u00a7 245, ECHR 2012;Nejdet \u015eahin and Perihan \u015eahin v. Turkey [GC], no. 13279\/05, \u00a7 49, 20 October 2011;Odi\u00e8vre v. France [GC], no. 42326\/98, \u00a7 46, ECHR 2003 III;Osman v. the United Kingdom, 28 October 1998, \u00a7\u00a7 128-30, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 VIII, \u00a7\u00a7 128-30;Pretty v. the United Kingdom, no. 2346\/02, \u00a7 65, ECHR 2002 III;Reklos and Davourlis v. Greece, no. 1234\/05, 15 January 2009;Sandra Jankovi\u0107 v. Croatia, no. 38478\/05, \u00a7 45, 5 March 2009;Sch\u00fcssel v. Austria (dec.), no. 42409\/98, 21 February 2002;Siliadin v. France, no. 73316\/01, \u00a7 130, ECHR 2005 VII;Szula v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 18727\/06, 4 January 2007;Von Hannover v. Germany (no. 2) [GC], nos. 40660\/08 and 60641\/08, ECHR 2012;X and Others v. Austria [GC], no. 19010\/07, \u00a7 163, ECHR 2013;X and Y v. the Netherlands, 26 March 1985, Series A no. 91;Z and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 29392\/95, \u00a7 73, ECHR 2001 V", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Positive obligations;Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);Non-pecuniary damage - award", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Andr\u00e9 Potocki;Ann Power-Forde;Corneliu B\u00eersan;Dean Spielmann;Elisabet Fura;Erik M\u00f8se;Ganna Yudkivska;Guido Raimondi;Helen Keller;Helena J\u00e4derblom;Ineta Ziemele;Isabelle Berro-Lef\u00e8vre;Johannes Silvis;Josep Casadevall;Julia Laffranque;Karel Jungwiert;Kristina Pardalos;Ledi Bianku;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Mark Villiger;Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska;Paulo Pinto De Albuquerque;Zdravka Kalaydjieva", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1112JUD000578608" }, "392": { "webcast_id": "578608_03042013", "hearing_date": "2013-04-03 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "S\u00f6derman v. Sweden (no. 5786\/08 )", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "5786\/08", "case_id": "001-111547", "case_name": "CASE OF E.S. v. SWEDEN", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-111547", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2012-06-21 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 3, "court": "23", "issue": "Sections 1-13 of Chapter 6, sections 10a and 17 of Chapter 16 and section 1 of Chapter 23 of the Penal Code ; Chapter 17, section 3 and Chapter 30, section 3 of the Code of Judicial Procedure ; sections 1 and 3 of Chapter 2 of the Tort Liability Act", "represented_by": "SODERGREN J.", "respondent": "SWE", "articles": "8;8-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "A v. Croatia, no. 55164\/08, \u00a7 60, 14 October 2010;Airey v. Ireland, 9 October 1979, \u00a7 32, Series A no. 32;Bladh v. Sweden (dec.), no. 46125\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 23-27, 10 November 2009;Christine Goodwin v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 28957\/95, \u00a7 74, ECHR 2002-VI;Evans v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 6339\/05, \u00a7 77, ECHR 2007-I;Fexler v. Sweden, no. 36801\/06, \u00a7 44, 13 October 2011;K.U. v. Finland, no. 2872\/02, 2 December 2008;Korbely v. Hungary [GC], no. 9174\/02, \u00a7\u00a770-71, ECHR 2008;M.C. v. Bulgaria, no. 39272\/98, ECHR 2003-XII;Mosley v. the United Kingdom, no. 48009\/08, \u00a7 109, 10 May 2011;Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803\/94, \u00a7 74, ECHR 1999-V;Von Hannover v. Germany (no. 2) [GC], nos. 40660\/08 and 60641\/08, \u00a7 104, 7 February 2012;Von Hannover v. Germany, no. 59320\/00, \u00a7 70, ECHR 2004-VI;X and Y v. the Netherlands, 26 March 1985, Series A no. 91", "external_sources": "Convention on the Protection of Children against Sexual Exploitation and Sexual Abuse", "conclusion": "No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Andr\u00e9 Potocki;Ann Power-Forde;Dean Spielmann;Elisabet Fura;Ganna Yudkivska;Karel Jungwiert;Mark Villiger", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0621JUD000578608" }, "393": { "webcast_id": "4275009_20032013", "hearing_date": "2013-03-20 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Del Rio Prada v. Spain (no. 42750\/09 )", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "42750\/09", "case_id": "001-127697", "case_name": "CASE OF DEL R\u00cdO PRADA v. SPAIN", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-127697", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2013-10-21 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Section 988 of the Criminal Procedure Act ; Articles 70.2 and 100 of the 1973 Criminal Code; Article 78 of the amended Criminal Code of 1995; Organic Law no. 7\/2003 introducing reforms to ensure the full and effective execution of sentences.", "represented_by": "SWAROOP S. ; MULLER M. ; IVERS M. ; ROUGET D. ; IZKO ARAMENDIA A. ; AIARTZA AZURTZA U.", "respondent": "ESP", "articles": "5;5-1;7;7-1;41;46;46-2", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Achour v. France [GC], no 67335\/01, ECHR 2006-IV;Aleksanyan v. Russia, no 46468\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 239-240, 22 December 2008;Alimu\u00e7aj v. Albania, no 20134\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 154-162, 7 February 2012;Amuur v. France, 25 June 1996, \u00a7 50, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-III;Assanidze v. Georgia [GC], no 71503\/01, \u00a7\u00a7 202-203, ECHR 2004-II;Baranowski v. Poland, no 28358\/95, \u00a7 52, ECHR 2000-III;Baskaya and Ok\u00e7uoglu v. Turkey [GC], nos. 23536\/94 and 24408\/94, \u00a7\u00a7 42-43, ECHR 1999-IV;Boulois v. Luxembourg [GC], no 37575\/04, \u00a7\u00a7 98-99, ECHR 2012;Broniowski v. Poland [GC], no 31443\/96, \u00a7 194, ECHR 2004-V;C.R. v. the United Kingdom, 22 November 1995, Series A no 335-C;Cantoni v. France, 15 November 1996, \u00a7 29, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-V;\u00c7elikkaya v. Turkey (dec.), no 34026\/03, 1er June 2010;Co\u00ebme and Others v. Belgium, nos. 32492\/96, 32547\/96, 32548\/96, 33209\/96 and 33210\/96, \u00a7 145, ECHR 2000-VII;Creanga v. Romania [GC], no 29226\/03, \u00a7 101, 23 February 2012;Dragotoniu and Militaru-Pidhorni v. Romania, nos. 77193\/01 and 77196\/01, \u00a7\u00a7 43-44, 24 May 2007;E.K. v. Turkey, no 28496\/95, \u00a7 51, 7 February 2002;Ecer and Zeyrek v. Turkey, nos. 29295\/95 and 29363\/95, \u00a7 36, ECHR 2001-II;Fatullayev v. Azerbaijan, no 40984\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 176-177, 22 April 2010;Giza v. Poland (dec.), no 1997\/11, \u00a7 31, 23 October 2012;Grava v. Italy, no. 43522\/98, 10 July 2003;Grosskopf v. Germany, no 24478\/03, \u00a7 44, 21 October 2010;Guzzardi v. Italy, 6 November 1980, \u00a7 100, Series A no 39;Hogben v. the United Kingdom, no 11635\/85, decision of the Commission de March 1986, D\u00e9cisions and Rapports (DR) 46;Hosein v. the United Kingdom, no 26293\/95, decision of the Commission du 28 February 1996;Irfan Kalan v. Turkey (dec.), no 73561\/01, 2 October 2001;Jamil v. France, 8 June 1995, Series A no 317-B;K.-H.W. v. Germany [GC], no 37201\/97, \u00a7 85, ECHR 2001-II (extracts);Kafkaris v. Cyprus [GC], no. 21906\/04, ECHR 2008;Kokkinakis v. Greece, 25 May 1993, Series A no 260-A;Kononov v. Latvia [GC], no 36376\/04, \u00a7 185, ECHR 2010;Korbely v. Hungary [GC], no 9174\/02, \u00a7 71, ECHR 2008;Kruslin v. France, 24 April 1990, \u00a7 29, Series A no 176-A;L.-G.R. v. Sweden, no 27032\/95, decision of the Commission du 15 January 1997;M. v. Germany, no 19359\/04, \u00a7 90, ECHR 2009;Macedo da Costa v. Luxembourg (dec.), no 26619\/07, 5 June 2012;Maktouf and Damjanovic v. Bosnia and Herzegovina [GC], nos. 2312\/08 and 34179\/08, \u00a7 75, 18 July 2013;Mihai Toma v. Romania, no 1051\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 26-31, 24 January 2012;Monne v. France (dec.), no 39420\/06, 1er April 2008;Oshurko v. Ukraine, no 33108\/05, \u00a7 98, 8 September 2011;Pessino v. France, no 40403\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 35-36, 10 October 2006;Pilla v. Italy, no 64088\/00, \u00a7 41, 2 March 2006;S.W. v. the United Kingdom, 22 November 1995, Series A no 335-B,;Sahin Karatas v. Turkey, no 16110\/03, \u00a7 37, 17 June 2008;Scoppola v. Italy (no. 2) [GC], no. 10249\/03, \u00a7 147, 17 September 2009;Scozzari and Giunta v. Italy [GC], nos. 39221\/98 and 41963\/98, \u00a7 249, ECHR 2000-VIII;Stafford v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 46295\/99, \u00a7 64, ECHR 2002-IV;Stanev v. Bulgaria [GC], no 36760\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 255-258, ECHR 2012;Streletz, Kessler and Krenz v. Germany [GC], nos.. 34044\/96, 35532\/97 and 44801\/98, \u00a7 50, ECHR 2001-II;Szab\u00f3 v. Sweden (dec.), no 28578\/03, 27 June 2006;Uttley v. the United Kingdom, (dec.), no 36946\/03, 29 November 2005;Van der Velden v. the Netherlands (dec.), no 29514\/05, ECHR 2006-XV;Van Droogenbroeck v. Belgium, 24 June 1982, Series A no 50;Verein gegen Tierfabriken Schweiz (VgT) v. Switzerland (no 2) [GC], no 32772\/02, \u00a7 85, ECHR 2009;Weeks v. the United Kingdom, 2 March 1987, Series A no 114, \u00a7 42;Welch v. the United Kingdom, 9 February 1995, Series A no 307-A", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Violation of Article 7 - No punishment without law (Article 7-1 - Heavier penalty;Nulla poena sine lege;Retroactivity);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention);Respondent State to take individual measures (Article 46-2 - Individual measures);Non-pecuniary damage - award", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Ale\u0161 Pejchal;Alvina Gyulumyan;Ann Power-Forde;Corneliu B\u00eersan;Dean Spielmann;Egbert Myjer;Elisabeth Steiner;George Nicolaou;Guido Raimondi;Ineta Ziemele;Isabelle Berro-Lef\u00e8vre;J\u00e1n \u0160ikuta;Johannes Silvis;Josep Casadevall;Ledi Bianku;Luis L\u00f3pez Guerra;Mark Villiger;Nona Tsotsoria;Paul Lemmens;Paul Mahoney", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1021JUD004275009" }, "394": { "webcast_id": "4275009_20032013", "hearing_date": "2013-03-20 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Del Rio Prada v. Spain (no. 42750\/09 )", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "42750\/09", "case_id": "001-112108", "case_name": "CASE OF DEL R\u00cdO PRADA v. SPAIN", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-112108", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2012-07-10 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 3, "court": "6", "issue": "Article 988 of the Code of Criminal Procedure ; Articles 70 \u00a7 2 and 100 of the Criminal Code of 1973 ; Article 78 of the Criminal Code of 1995 ; Article 59 of the Prison Rules of 1981", "represented_by": "ROUGET D. ; ARAMENDIA I.", "respondent": "ESP", "articles": "5;5-1;7;7-1;35;35-3;41;46;46-2", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Achour v. France [GC], no 67335\/01, \u00a7 44, ECHR 2006-IV;Aleksanyan v. Russia, no 46468\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 239-240, 22 December 2008;Amuur v. France, 25 June 1996, \u00a7 50, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-III;Assanidze v. Georgia [GC], no 71503\/01, \u00a7\u00a7 202-203, ECHR 2004-II;Bozano v. France, judgment of 18 December 1986, \u00a7 54, Series A no 111;Broniowski v. Poland [GC], no 31443\/96, \u00a7 194, ECHR 2004-V;Cantoni v. France, 15 November 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-V;\u00c7elikkaya v. Turkey (dec.), no 34026\/03, 1er June 2010;Co\u00ebme and Others v. Belgium, nos. 32492\/96, 32547\/96, 32548\/96, 33209\/96 and 33210\/96, \u00a7 145, ECHR 2000-VII;Fatullayev v. Azerbaijan, no 40984\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 176-177, 22 April 2010;Garagin v. Italy (dec.), no 33290\/07, 29 April 2008;Grava v. Italy, no 43522\/98, 10 July 2003;Gurguchiani v. Spain, no 16012\/06, 15 December 2009;Hosein v. the United Kingdom, no 26293\/95, Commission Decision of 28 February 1996;Irfan Kalan v. Turkey (dec.), no 73561\/01, 2 October 2001;Jamil v. France, 8 June 1995, \u00a7\u00a7 30-31, Series A no 317-B;Kafkaris v. Cyprus [GC], no 21906\/04, ECHR 2008-...;Kokkinakis v. Greece, 25 May 1993, Series A no 260-A;M. v. Germany, no 19359\/04, ECHR 2009;Oshurko v. Ukraine, no 33108\/05, \u00a7 98, 8 September 2011;Pilla v. Italy, no 64088\/00, \u00a7 41, 2 March 2006;S.W. v. the United Kingdom, 22 November 1995, \u00a7\u00a7 35-36, Series A no 335-B;Scoppola v. Italy (no 2) [GC], no 10249\/03, 17 September 2009;Scozzari and Giunta v. Italy [GC], nos. 39221\/98 and 41963\/98, \u00a7 249, ECHR 2000-VIII;Stafford v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 46295\/99, \u00a7 64, ECHR 2002-IV;Streletz, Kessler and Krenz v. Germany [GC], nos. 34044\/96, 35532\/97 and 44801\/98, \u00a7 50, ECHR 2001-II;Weeks v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 2 March 1987, \u00a7 42, Series A no 114;Welch v. the United Kingdom, 9 February 1995, \u00a7\u00a7 27-28, Series A no 307-A", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Article 35-3 - Ratione materiae);Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 7 - No punishment without law (Article 7-1 - Heavier penalty;Nulla poena sine lege;Retroactivity);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention);Respondent State to take individual measures (Article 46-2 - Individual measures);Non-pecuniary damage - award", "separate_opinion": "FALSE", "judges": "Alvina Gyulumyan;Corneliu B\u00eersan;Egbert Myjer;J\u00e1n \u0160ikuta;Josep Casadevall;Luis L\u00f3pez Guerra;Nona Tsotsoria", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0710JUD004275009" }, "395": { "webcast_id": "3581009_06032013", "hearing_date": "2013-03-06 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "O\u2019Keeffe v. Ireland (no. 35810\/09)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "35810\/09", "case_id": "001-140235", "case_name": "CASE OF O'KEEFFE v. IRELAND", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-140235", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2014-01-28 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Section 4 of the School Attendance Act 1926 ; Article 42 of the Constitution 1937 ; Children Act 1908 ; Section 14 of the Education Act 1998 ; Rules for National Schools 1965 ; Sections 50 and 51 of the Offences Against the Person Act 1861 ; Sections 1, 2, 14 of the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act 1935 ; Section 176 of the Criminal Justice Act 2006", "represented_by": "CANTILLON E.", "respondent": "IRL", "articles": "3;13;13+3;34;35;35-1;35-3;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "A, B and C v. Ireland [GC], no. 25579\/05, \u00a7 281, ECHR 2010;A. v. the United Kingdom, 23 September 1998, \u00a7 22, Reports 1998 VI;Airey v. Ireland, 9 October 1979, \u00a7 25, Series A no. 32;August v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 36505\/02, 21 January 2003;Beganovi\u0107 v. Croatia, no. 46423\/06, \u00a7 71, 25 June 2009;C.A.S. and C.S. v. Romania, no. 26692\/05, 20 March 2012;Calvelli and Ciglio v. Italy [GC], no. 32967\/96, ECHR 2002 I;Campbell and Cosans v. the United Kingdom, 25 February 1982, \u00a7 8, Series A no. 48;Caraher v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 24520\/94, ECHR 2000 I;Costello-Roberts v. the United Kingdom, 25 March 1993, \u00a7 27, Series A no. 247 C;D. v. Ireland (dec.), no. 26499\/02, \u00a7 85, 27 June 2006;D.P. and J.C. v. the United Kingdom, no. 38719\/97, \u00a7 109, 10 October 2002;Dalban v. Romania [GC], no. 28114\/95, \u00a7 44, ECHR 1999-VI;E. and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 33218\/96, \u00a7 112, 26 November 2002;El Masri v. \"the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia\" [GC], no. 39630\/09, \u00a7 269, ECHR 2012;G\u00e4fgen v. Germany [GC], no. 22978\/05, \u00a7 115 and 118, ECHR 2010;Grzelak v. Poland, no. 7710\/02, \u00a7 87, 15 June 2010;Hay v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 41894\/98, ECHR 2000 XI;Ilbeyi Kemalo\u011flu and Meriye Kemalo\u011flu v. Turkey, no. 19986\/06, \u00a7 35, 10 April 2012;Jeli\u010di\u0107 v. Bosnia and Herzegovina (dec.), no. 41183\/02, 15 November 2005;Juppala v. Finland, no. 18620\/03, \u00a7 42, 2 December 2008;Leja v. Latvia, no. 71072\/01, \u00a7 46, 14 June 2011;M.C. v. Bulgaria, no. 39272\/98, \u00a7\u00a7 149-150, ECHR 2003 XII;Mahmut Kaya v. Turkey, no. 22535\/93, \u00a7 115, ECHR 2000 III;Marckx v. Belgium, 13 June 1979, \u00a7 31, Series A no. 31;McFarlane v. Ireland [GC], no. 31333\/06, 10 September 2010;Moreira Barbosa v. Portugal (dec.), no. 65681\/01, ECHR 2004-V;O\u2019Reilly v. Ireland, no. 24196\/94, Commission decision of 22 January 1996;Odi\u00e8vre v. France [GC], no. 42326\/98, \u00a7 22, ECHR 2003 III;Osman v. the United Kingdom, 28 October 1998, Reports 1998 VIII;Scordino v. Italy (no. 1) [GC], no. 36813\/97, \u00a7\u00a7 214-215, ECHR 2006 V;Shkalla v. Albania, no. 26866\/05, \u00a7 61, 10 May 2011;Storck v. Germany, no. 61603\/00, \u00a7 103, ECHR 2005 V;T.W. v. Malta [GC], no. 25644\/94, \u00a7 34, 29 April 1999;Valiuliene v. Lithuania, no. 33234\/07, \u00a7 87, 26 March 2013;Van der Mussele v. Belgium, 23 November 1983, Series A no. 70;Varnava and Others v. Turkey [GC], nos. 16064\/90, 16065\/90, 16066\/90, 16068\/90, 16069\/90, 16070\/90, 16071\/90, 16072\/90 and 16073\/90, \u00a7 140, ECHR 2009;X and Others v. Austria [GC], no. 19010\/07, \u00a7 163, 19 February 2013;X and Y v. the Netherlands, 26 March 1985, Series A no. 91, \u00a7\u00a7 21\u201327;Z and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 29392\/95, ECHR 2001 V", "external_sources": "Carrigan Report 1931;Cussen and Kennedy reports on reformatory and industrial schools;Ryan Report on reformatory and industrial schools;Ferns Report 2005;Murphy Report 2009;Cloyne Report 2011;Recommendation of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe 561 entitled \"Protection of Minors against ill-treatment\";Article 7 of the European Social Charter 1961;Recommendation No. R (79) 17 of the Committee of Ministers on the protection of children against ill-treatment;Geneva Declaration of the Rights of the Child;UN Declaration of the Rights of the Child 1959;Universal Declaration of Human Rights 1948;Article 24 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights;Article 2 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights;International Convention on the Rights of the Child 1989", "conclusion": "Preliminary objection dismissed (Article 35-1 - Exhaustion of domestic remedies);Preliminary objection dismissed (Article 34 - Victim);Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Article 35-3 - Manifestly ill-founded);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment;Positive obligations) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 13+3 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment;Prohibition of torture);No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage - award", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Alvina Gyulumyan;Andr\u00e9 Potocki;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Ann Power-Forde;Dean Spielmann;Ganna Yudkivska;Guido Raimondi;Ineta Ziemele;Isabelle Berro-Lef\u00e8vre;Josep Casadevall;Karel Jungwiert;Krzysztof Wojtyczek;Mark Villiger;Neboj\u0161a Vu\u010dini\u0107;Nona Tsotsoria;Vincent A. De Gaetano;Zdravka Kalaydjieva", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0128JUD003581009" }, "396": { "webcast_id": "3581009_06032013", "hearing_date": "2013-03-06 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "O\u2019Keeffe v. Ireland (no. 35810\/09)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "35810\/09", "case_id": "001-111189", "case_name": "O'KEEFFE v. IRELAND", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-111189", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "2011-04-05 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "CANTILLON ERNEST", "respondent": "IRL", "articles": "3;6;8;13;13+3;13+6;14;14+3;14+8;14+P1-2;P1-2", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Communicated", "separate_opinion": "FALSE", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "397": { "webcast_id": "3581009_06032013", "hearing_date": "2013-03-06 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "O\u2019Keeffe v. Ireland (no. 35810\/09)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "35810\/09", "case_id": "001-112135", "case_name": "O'KEEFFE v. IRELAND", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-112135", "type": "DECISIONS", "typedescription": 8, "document_date": "", "collection": "CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "23", "issue": "", "represented_by": "CANTILLON E. J. AND CO.", "respondent": "IRL", "articles": "3;6;8;13;13+3;13+6;14;14+8;14+P1-2;35;37;37-1;P1-2", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Partly struck out of the list;Partly admissible", "separate_opinion": "", "judges": "Andr\u00e9 Potocki;Dean Spielmann;Ganna Yudkivska;Karel Jungwiert;Mark Villiger", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0626DEC003581009" }, "398": { "webcast_id": "5550807_13022013", "hearing_date": "2013-02-13 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Janowiec and Others v. Russia (nos. 55508\/07 and 29520\/09)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "55508\/07", "case_id": "001-127684", "case_name": "CASE OF JANOWIEC AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-127684", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2013-10-21 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Section 7 of the State Secrets Act", "represented_by": "SZEWCZYK J. ; KAMINSKI I. ; NOWOSIELSKI R. ; SOCHANSKI B. ; KARPINSKIY R. ; STAVITSKAYA A.", "respondent": "RUS", "articles": "2;2-1;3;34;35;35-3-a;38;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "A\u00e7is v. Turkey, no. 7050\/05, 1 February 2011;Agache and Others v. Romania, no. 2712\/02, 20 October 2009;Akhmadova and Sadulayeva v. Russia, no. 40464\/02, \u00a7 137, 10 May 2007;Akkum and Others v. Turkey, no. 21894\/93, \u00a7\u00a7 258-259, ECHR 2005-II (extracts);Al-Nashif v. Bulgaria, no. 50963\/99, \u00a7\u00a7 123 and 124, 20 June 2002;Aslakhanova and Others v. Russia, nos. 2944\/06, 8300\/07, 50184\/07, 332\/08 and 42509\/10, 18 December 2012;Association \u201c21 December 1989\u201d and Others v. Romania, nos. 33810\/07 and 18817\/08, 24 May 2011;Bajic v. Croatia, no. 41108\/10, \u00a7 62, 13 November 2012;Bazorkina v. Russia, no. 69481\/01, \u00a7 139, 27 July 2006;Bekirski v. Bulgaria, no. 71420\/01, \u00a7\u00a7 111-113, 2 September 2010;Bitiyeva and Others v. Russia, no. 36156\/04, \u00a7 106, 23 April 2009;Blecic v. Croatia [GC], no. 59532\/00, ECHR 2006-III;Brecknell v. the United Kingdom, no. 32457\/04, 27 November 2007;\u00c7akici v. Turkey [GC], no. 23657\/94, \u00a7 98, ECHR 1999-IV;\u00c7akir and Others v. Cyprus (dec.), no. 7864\/06, 29 April 2010;Crainiceanu and Frumusanu v. Romania, no. 12442\/04, 24 April 2012;Dalban v. Romania [GC], no. 28114\/95, \u00a7 39, ECHR 1999-VI;Damayev v. Russia, no. 36150\/04, \u00a7 97, 29 May 2012;Damir Sibgatullin v. Russia, no. 1413\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 65-68, 24 April 2012;Davydov and Others v. Ukraine, nos. 17674\/02 and 39081\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 167 et seq., 1 July 2010;Dedovskiy and Others v. Russia, no. 7178\/03, \u00a7 107, ECHR 2008 (extracts);Dimovi v. Bulgaria, no. 52744\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 36-45, 6 November 2012;Enukidze and Girgvliani v. Georgia, no. 25091\/07, 26 April 2011;Er and Others v. Turkey, no. 23016\/04, \u00a7\u00a7 59-60, ECHR 2012 (extracts);Esmukhambetov and Others v. Russia, no. 23445\/03, \u00a7 190, 29 March 2011;Gongadze v. Ukraine, no. 34056\/02, \u00a7 184, ECHR 2005-XI;Guti\u00e9rrez Dorado and Dorado Ortiz v. Spain (dec.), no. 30141\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 39-41, 27 March 2012;Igor Shevchenko v. Ukraine, no. 22737\/04, \u00a7\u00a7 45-48, 12 January 2012;Imakayeva v. Russia, no. 7615\/02, \u00a7 155, ECHR 2006-XIII (extracts);Inderbiyeva v. Russia, no. 56765\/08, \u00a7 110, 27 March 2012;Ireland v. the United Kingdom, 18 January 1978, \u00a7 210, Series A no. 25;Jularic v. Croatia, no. 20106\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 38 and 45-46, 20 January 2011;Karner v. Austria, no. 40016\/98, \u00a7 25, ECHR 2003-IX;Khadzhialiyev and Others v. Russia, no. 3013\/04, \u00a7 121, 6 November 2008;Khashuyeva v. Russia, no. 25553\/07, \u00a7 154, 19 July 2011;Kopeck\u00fd v. Slovakia [GC], no. 44912\/98, \u00a7 38, ECHR 2004-IX;Kudra v. Croatia, no. 13904\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 110-112, 18 December 2012;Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772\/95, \u00a7 131, ECHR 2000-IV;Lapusan and Others v. Romania, nos. 29007\/06, 30552\/06, 31323\/06, 31920\/06, 34485\/06, 38960\/06, 38996\/06, 39027\/06 and 39067\/06, 8 March 2011;Liu v. Russia (no. 2), no. 29157\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 85-87, 26 July 2011;Lukanov v. Bulgaria, 20 March 1997, \u00a7 40, Reports 1997-II;Luluyev and Others v. Russia, no. 69480\/01, \u00a7 114, ECHR 2006-XIII (extracts);Lyubov Efimenko v. Ukraine, no. 75726\/01, \u00a7 65, 25 November 2010;Maslova and Nalbandov v. Russia, no. 839\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 128-129, 24 January 2008;McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, 27 September 1995, \u00a7 161, Series A no. 324;McShane v. the United Kingdom, no. 43290\/98, \u00a7 151, 28 May 2002;Mladenovic v. Serbia, no. 1099\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 38-40, 22 May 2012;Mocanu and Others v. Romania, nos. 10865\/09, 45886\/07 and 32431\/08, 13 November 2012;Musayev and Others v. Russia, nos. 57941\/00, 58699\/00 and 60403\/00, \u00a7 169, 26 July 2007;Musikhanova and Others v. Russia, no. 27243\/03, \u00a7 107, 4 December 2008;Nevmerzhitsky v. Ukraine, no. 54825\/00, \u00a7 77, ECHR 2005-II (extracts);Nolan and K. v. Russia, no. 2512\/04, \u00a7 56, 12 February 2009;Orhan v. Turkey, no. 25656\/94, \u00a7 358, 18 June 2002;Osmanoglu v. Turkey, no. 48804\/99, \u00a7 96, 24 January 2008;Ota\u0161evic v. Serbia, no. 32198\/07, 5 February 2013;P.M. v. Bulgaria, no. 49669\/07, \u00a7 58, 24 January 2012;Pa\u00e7aci and Others v. Turkey, no. 3064\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 64-66, 8 November 2011;Pastor and Ticlete v. Romania, nos. 30911\/06 and 40967\/06, 19 April 2011;Poleshchuk v. Russia, no. 60776\/00, 7 October 2004;Sabri G\u00fcnes v. Turkey [GC], no. 27396\/06, \u00a7 50, 29 June 2012;Salakhov and Islyamova v. Ukraine, no. 28005\/08, \u00a7 204, 14 March 2013;Sambiyev and Pokayeva v. Russia, no. 38693\/04, \u00a7\u00a7 74-75, 22 January 2009;Sandru and Others v. Romania, no. 22465\/03, 8 December 2009;Sasita Israilova and Others v. Russia, no. 35079\/04, \u00a7 145, 28 October 2010;Shakhgiriyeva and Others v. Russia, no. 27251\/03, \u00a7\u00a7 134-140, 8 January 2009;\u0160ilih v. Slovenia [GC], no. 71463\/01, 9 April 2009;Stanimirovic v. Serbia, no. 26088\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 28-29, 18 October 2011;Tahsin Acar v. Turkey [GC], no. 26307\/95, \u00a7\u00a7 253-254, ECHR 2004-III;Tangiyeva. Russia, no. 57935\/00, \u00a7 104, 29 November 2007;Tanis and Others v. Turkey, no. 65899\/01, \u00a7 219, ECHR 2005-VIII;Tanli v. Turkey, no. 26129\/95, \u00a7 159, ECHR 2001-III;Tanrikulu v. Turkey [GC], no. 23763\/94, \u00a7 70, ECHR 1999-IV;Tigran Ayrapetyan v. Russia, no. 75472\/01, \u00a7 64, 16 September 2010;Timurtas v. Turkey, no. 23531\/94, \u00a7\u00a7 66 and 70, ECHR 2000-VI;Trubnikov v. Russia, no. 49790\/99, \u00a7\u00a7 50-57, 5 July 2005;Trufin v. Romania, no. 3990\/04, \u00a7\u00a7 32-34, 20 October 2009;Tuna v. Turkey, no. 22339\/03, \u00a7\u00a7 57-63, 19 January 2010;Udayeva and Yusupova v. Russia, no. 36542\/05, \u00a7 82, 21 December 2010;Utsayeva and Others v. Russia, no. 29133\/03, \u00a7\u00a7 149-153, 29 May 2008;Vagapova and Zubirayev v. Russia, no. 21080\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 85-86, 26 February 2009;Varnava and Others v. Turkey [GC], nos. 16064\/90, 16065\/90, 16066\/90, 16068\/90, 16069\/90, 16070\/90, 16071\/90, 16072\/90 and 16073\/90, ECHR 2009;Velcea and Mazare v. Romania, no. 64301\/01, \u00a7\u00a7 85-88, 1 December 2009;Velkhiyev and Others v. Russia, no. 34085\/06, \u00a7 137, 5 July 2011;Yasin Ates v. Turkey, no. 30949\/96, \u00a7 135, 31 May 2005;Yatsenko v. Ukraine, no. 75345\/01, \u00a7 40, 16 February 2012;Zubayrayev v. Russia, no. 67797\/01, \u00a7\u00a7 74-77, 10 January 2008", "external_sources": "Articles 26, 27 and 28 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties of 23 May 1969", "conclusion": "Preliminary objection allowed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione temporis;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 38 - Examination of the case-{general} (Article 38 - Obligation to furnish all necessary facilities);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed;Non-pecuniary damage - claim dismissed", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Alvina Gyulumyan;Anatoly Kovler;Corneliu B\u00eersan;Dean Spielmann;Dmitry Dedov;Ganna Yudkivska;Guido Raimondi;Helen Keller;Helena J\u00e4derblom;Ineta Ziemele;Isabelle Berro-Lef\u00e8vre;Josep Casadevall;Julia Laffranque;Karel Jungwiert;Khanlar Hajiyev;Kristina Pardalos;Krzysztof Wojtyczek;Luis L\u00f3pez Guerra;Mark Villiger;Peer Lorenzen;Vincent A. De Gaetano", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1021JUD005550807" }, "399": { "webcast_id": "5550807_13022013", "hearing_date": "2013-02-13 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Janowiec and Others v. Russia (nos. 55508\/07 and 29520\/09)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "55508\/07", "case_id": "001-110513", "case_name": "CASE OF JANOWIEC AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-110513", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2012-04-16 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 2, "court": "23", "issue": "Articles 24 and 42 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Law no. 174-FZ of 18 December 2001) ; Sections 1, 3 and 4 of the Rehabilitation Act (Law no. 1761-I of 18 October 1991) ; Section 7 of the State Secrets Act (Law no. 5485-I of 21 July 1993) ; Regulation on preparing State secret information for transfer to foreign states and international organisations (no. 973) ; Articles 78 and 356 of the Criminal Code (Law no. 63-FZ of 13 June 1996)", "represented_by": "SZEWCZYK J. ; KAMINSKI I. ; NOWOSIELSKI R. ; SOCHANSKI B. ; KARPINSKIY R. ; STAVITSKAYA A.", "respondent": "RUS", "articles": "2;2-1;3;35;35-3-a;38;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "A\u00e7is v. Turkey, no. 7050\/05, 1 February 2011;Agache and Others v. Romania, no. 2712\/02, 20 October 2009;Association 21 December 1989 and Others v. Romania, nos. 33810\/07 and 18817\/08, 24 May 2011;Bazorkina v. Russia, no. 69481\/01, \u00a7 139, 27 July 2006;Bekirski v. Bulgaria, no. 71420\/01, 2 September 2010;Blecic v. Croatia [GC], no. 59532\/00, ECHR 2006-III;Brecknell v. the United Kingdom, no. 32457\/04, 27 November 2007;Byrzykowski v. Poland, no. 11562\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 86 and 94-118, 27 June 2006;\u00c7akici v. Turkey [GC], no. 23657\/94, \u00a7 98, ECHR 1999-IV;Calvelli and Ciglio v. Italy [GC], no. 32967\/96, \u00a7 \u00a7 41-57, ECHR 2002-I;Dalban v. Romania [GC], no. 28114\/95, \u00a7 39, ECHR 1999-VI;Davydov and Others v. Ukraine, nos. 17674\/02 and 39081\/02, 1 July 2010;Enukidze and Girgvliani v. Georgia, no. 25091\/07, 26 April 2011;Garaudy v. France, (dec.), no. 65831\/01, ECHR 2003-IX (extracts);Gongadze v. Ukraine, no. 34056\/02, ECHR 2005-XI;Imakayeva v. Russia, no. 7615\/02, \u00a7 165, ECHR 2006-XIII (extracts);Ireland v. the United Kingdom, 18 January 1978, \u00a7 210, Series A no. 25;Jularic v. Croatia, no. 20106\/06, 20 January 2011;Karner v. Austria, no. 40016\/98, \u00a7 25, ECHR 2003-IX;Lapusan and Others v. Romania, nos. 29007\/06, etc., \u00a7 59, 8 March 2011;Lehideux and Isorni v. France, 23 September 1998, \u00a7 53, Reports 1998-VII;Lukanov v. Bulgaria, 20 March 1997, \u00a7 40, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-II;Luluyev and Others v. Russia, no. 69480\/01, ECHR 2006-XIII (extracts);Lyubov Efimenko v. Ukraine, no. 75726\/01, 25 November 2010;Medova v. Russia, no. 25385\/04, \u00a7 76, 15 January 2009;Musikhanova and Others v. Russia, no. 27243\/03, 4 December 2008;Nachova and Others v. Bulgaria [GC], nos. 43577\/98 and 43579\/98, \u00a7\u00a7 110-113, ECHR 2005-VII;Nevmerzhitsky v. Ukraine, no. 54825\/00, \u00a7 77, ECHR 2005-II (extracts);Nolan and K. v. Russia, no. 2512\/04, 12 February 2009;Orban and Others v. France, no. 20985\/05, 15 January 2009;Orhan v. Turkey, no. 25656\/94, 18 June 2002;Osmanoglu v. Turkey, no. 48804\/99, \u00a7 96, 24 January 2008;Sandru and Others v. Romania, no. 22465\/03, 8 December 2009;Sasita Israilova and Others v. Russia, no. 35079\/04, \u00a7 145, 28 October 2010;Schedko v. Belarus, No. 886\/1999, 3 April 2003;\u0160ilih v. Slovenia, [GC], no. 71463\/01, 9 April 2009;Tanis and Others v. Turkey, no. 65899\/01, \u00a7 219, ECHR 2005-VIII;;Tanrikulu v. Turkey [GC], no. 23763\/94, \u00a7 70, ECHR 1999-IV;Taymuskhanovy v. Russia, no. 11528\/07, \u00a7 122, 16 December 2010;Tigran Ayrapetyan v. Russia, no. 75472\/01, \u00a7 64, 16 September 2010;Timurtas v. Turkey, no. 23531\/94, , ECHR 2000-VI;Trubnikov v. Russia, no. 49790\/99, \u00a7\u00a7 50-57, 5 July 2005;Varnava and Others v. Turkey ([GC], nos. 16064\/90, 16065\/90, etc., ECHR 2009-...;Velikova v. Bulgaria, no. 41488\/98, \u00a7 77, ECHR 2000-VI", "external_sources": "The Convention (IV) respecting the Laws and Customs of War on Land and its annex: Regulations concerning the Laws and Customs of War on Land (The Hague, 18 October 1907);The Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War (Geneva, 27 July 1929);Principle VI in the Principles of International Law Recognized in the Charter of the Nuremberg Tribunal;Convention on the Non-Applicability of Statutory Limitations to War Crimes and Crimes Against Humanity (26 November 1968);Articles 26-28 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (23 May 1969);Human Rights Committee\u2019s General Comment No. 31 [80], The Nature of the General Legal Obligation Imposed on States Parties to the Covenant, adopted on 29 March 2004;Article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights", "conclusion": "Preliminary objection allowed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione temporis;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;Violation of Article 38 - Examination of the case-{general} (Article 38 - Obligation to furnish all necessary facilities);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Anatoly Kovler;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Dean Spielmann;Ganna Yudkivska;Karel Jungwiert;Mark Villiger", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0416JUD005550807" }, "400": { "webcast_id": "5550807_13022013", "hearing_date": "2013-02-13 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Janowiec and Others v. Russia (nos. 55508\/07 and 29520\/09)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "55508\/07", "case_id": "001-105727", "case_name": "JANOWIEC AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-105727", "type": "DECISIONS", "typedescription": 8, "document_date": "", "collection": "CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "23", "issue": "", "represented_by": "SZEWCZYK J.", "respondent": "RUS", "articles": "2;3;6;8;13", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Partly admissible;Partly inadmissible", "separate_opinion": "", "judges": "Anatoly Kovler;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Dean Spielmann;Isabelle Berro-Lef\u00e8vre;Karel Jungwiert;Mark Villiger", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0705DEC005550807" }, "401": { "webcast_id": "5550807_13022013", "hearing_date": "2013-02-13 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Janowiec and Others v. Russia (nos. 55508\/07 and 29520\/09)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "29520\/09", "case_id": "001-127684", "case_name": "CASE OF JANOWIEC AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-127684", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2013-10-21 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Section 7 of the State Secrets Act", "represented_by": "SZEWCZYK J. ; KAMINSKI I. ; NOWOSIELSKI R. ; SOCHANSKI B. ; KARPINSKIY R. ; STAVITSKAYA A.", "respondent": "RUS", "articles": "2;2-1;3;34;35;35-3-a;38;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "A\u00e7is v. Turkey, no. 7050\/05, 1 February 2011;Agache and Others v. Romania, no. 2712\/02, 20 October 2009;Akhmadova and Sadulayeva v. Russia, no. 40464\/02, \u00a7 137, 10 May 2007;Akkum and Others v. Turkey, no. 21894\/93, \u00a7\u00a7 258-259, ECHR 2005-II (extracts);Al-Nashif v. Bulgaria, no. 50963\/99, \u00a7\u00a7 123 and 124, 20 June 2002;Aslakhanova and Others v. Russia, nos. 2944\/06, 8300\/07, 50184\/07, 332\/08 and 42509\/10, 18 December 2012;Association \u201c21 December 1989\u201d and Others v. Romania, nos. 33810\/07 and 18817\/08, 24 May 2011;Bajic v. Croatia, no. 41108\/10, \u00a7 62, 13 November 2012;Bazorkina v. Russia, no. 69481\/01, \u00a7 139, 27 July 2006;Bekirski v. Bulgaria, no. 71420\/01, \u00a7\u00a7 111-113, 2 September 2010;Bitiyeva and Others v. Russia, no. 36156\/04, \u00a7 106, 23 April 2009;Blecic v. Croatia [GC], no. 59532\/00, ECHR 2006-III;Brecknell v. the United Kingdom, no. 32457\/04, 27 November 2007;\u00c7akici v. Turkey [GC], no. 23657\/94, \u00a7 98, ECHR 1999-IV;\u00c7akir and Others v. Cyprus (dec.), no. 7864\/06, 29 April 2010;Crainiceanu and Frumusanu v. Romania, no. 12442\/04, 24 April 2012;Dalban v. Romania [GC], no. 28114\/95, \u00a7 39, ECHR 1999-VI;Damayev v. Russia, no. 36150\/04, \u00a7 97, 29 May 2012;Damir Sibgatullin v. Russia, no. 1413\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 65-68, 24 April 2012;Davydov and Others v. Ukraine, nos. 17674\/02 and 39081\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 167 et seq., 1 July 2010;Dedovskiy and Others v. Russia, no. 7178\/03, \u00a7 107, ECHR 2008 (extracts);Dimovi v. Bulgaria, no. 52744\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 36-45, 6 November 2012;Enukidze and Girgvliani v. Georgia, no. 25091\/07, 26 April 2011;Er and Others v. Turkey, no. 23016\/04, \u00a7\u00a7 59-60, ECHR 2012 (extracts);Esmukhambetov and Others v. Russia, no. 23445\/03, \u00a7 190, 29 March 2011;Gongadze v. Ukraine, no. 34056\/02, \u00a7 184, ECHR 2005-XI;Guti\u00e9rrez Dorado and Dorado Ortiz v. Spain (dec.), no. 30141\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 39-41, 27 March 2012;Igor Shevchenko v. Ukraine, no. 22737\/04, \u00a7\u00a7 45-48, 12 January 2012;Imakayeva v. Russia, no. 7615\/02, \u00a7 155, ECHR 2006-XIII (extracts);Inderbiyeva v. Russia, no. 56765\/08, \u00a7 110, 27 March 2012;Ireland v. the United Kingdom, 18 January 1978, \u00a7 210, Series A no. 25;Jularic v. Croatia, no. 20106\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 38 and 45-46, 20 January 2011;Karner v. Austria, no. 40016\/98, \u00a7 25, ECHR 2003-IX;Khadzhialiyev and Others v. Russia, no. 3013\/04, \u00a7 121, 6 November 2008;Khashuyeva v. Russia, no. 25553\/07, \u00a7 154, 19 July 2011;Kopeck\u00fd v. Slovakia [GC], no. 44912\/98, \u00a7 38, ECHR 2004-IX;Kudra v. Croatia, no. 13904\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 110-112, 18 December 2012;Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772\/95, \u00a7 131, ECHR 2000-IV;Lapusan and Others v. Romania, nos. 29007\/06, 30552\/06, 31323\/06, 31920\/06, 34485\/06, 38960\/06, 38996\/06, 39027\/06 and 39067\/06, 8 March 2011;Liu v. Russia (no. 2), no. 29157\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 85-87, 26 July 2011;Lukanov v. Bulgaria, 20 March 1997, \u00a7 40, Reports 1997-II;Luluyev and Others v. Russia, no. 69480\/01, \u00a7 114, ECHR 2006-XIII (extracts);Lyubov Efimenko v. Ukraine, no. 75726\/01, \u00a7 65, 25 November 2010;Maslova and Nalbandov v. Russia, no. 839\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 128-129, 24 January 2008;McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, 27 September 1995, \u00a7 161, Series A no. 324;McShane v. the United Kingdom, no. 43290\/98, \u00a7 151, 28 May 2002;Mladenovic v. Serbia, no. 1099\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 38-40, 22 May 2012;Mocanu and Others v. Romania, nos. 10865\/09, 45886\/07 and 32431\/08, 13 November 2012;Musayev and Others v. Russia, nos. 57941\/00, 58699\/00 and 60403\/00, \u00a7 169, 26 July 2007;Musikhanova and Others v. Russia, no. 27243\/03, \u00a7 107, 4 December 2008;Nevmerzhitsky v. Ukraine, no. 54825\/00, \u00a7 77, ECHR 2005-II (extracts);Nolan and K. v. Russia, no. 2512\/04, \u00a7 56, 12 February 2009;Orhan v. Turkey, no. 25656\/94, \u00a7 358, 18 June 2002;Osmanoglu v. Turkey, no. 48804\/99, \u00a7 96, 24 January 2008;Ota\u0161evic v. Serbia, no. 32198\/07, 5 February 2013;P.M. v. Bulgaria, no. 49669\/07, \u00a7 58, 24 January 2012;Pa\u00e7aci and Others v. Turkey, no. 3064\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 64-66, 8 November 2011;Pastor and Ticlete v. Romania, nos. 30911\/06 and 40967\/06, 19 April 2011;Poleshchuk v. Russia, no. 60776\/00, 7 October 2004;Sabri G\u00fcnes v. Turkey [GC], no. 27396\/06, \u00a7 50, 29 June 2012;Salakhov and Islyamova v. Ukraine, no. 28005\/08, \u00a7 204, 14 March 2013;Sambiyev and Pokayeva v. Russia, no. 38693\/04, \u00a7\u00a7 74-75, 22 January 2009;Sandru and Others v. Romania, no. 22465\/03, 8 December 2009;Sasita Israilova and Others v. Russia, no. 35079\/04, \u00a7 145, 28 October 2010;Shakhgiriyeva and Others v. Russia, no. 27251\/03, \u00a7\u00a7 134-140, 8 January 2009;\u0160ilih v. Slovenia [GC], no. 71463\/01, 9 April 2009;Stanimirovic v. Serbia, no. 26088\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 28-29, 18 October 2011;Tahsin Acar v. Turkey [GC], no. 26307\/95, \u00a7\u00a7 253-254, ECHR 2004-III;Tangiyeva. Russia, no. 57935\/00, \u00a7 104, 29 November 2007;Tanis and Others v. Turkey, no. 65899\/01, \u00a7 219, ECHR 2005-VIII;Tanli v. Turkey, no. 26129\/95, \u00a7 159, ECHR 2001-III;Tanrikulu v. Turkey [GC], no. 23763\/94, \u00a7 70, ECHR 1999-IV;Tigran Ayrapetyan v. Russia, no. 75472\/01, \u00a7 64, 16 September 2010;Timurtas v. Turkey, no. 23531\/94, \u00a7\u00a7 66 and 70, ECHR 2000-VI;Trubnikov v. Russia, no. 49790\/99, \u00a7\u00a7 50-57, 5 July 2005;Trufin v. Romania, no. 3990\/04, \u00a7\u00a7 32-34, 20 October 2009;Tuna v. Turkey, no. 22339\/03, \u00a7\u00a7 57-63, 19 January 2010;Udayeva and Yusupova v. Russia, no. 36542\/05, \u00a7 82, 21 December 2010;Utsayeva and Others v. Russia, no. 29133\/03, \u00a7\u00a7 149-153, 29 May 2008;Vagapova and Zubirayev v. Russia, no. 21080\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 85-86, 26 February 2009;Varnava and Others v. Turkey [GC], nos. 16064\/90, 16065\/90, 16066\/90, 16068\/90, 16069\/90, 16070\/90, 16071\/90, 16072\/90 and 16073\/90, ECHR 2009;Velcea and Mazare v. Romania, no. 64301\/01, \u00a7\u00a7 85-88, 1 December 2009;Velkhiyev and Others v. Russia, no. 34085\/06, \u00a7 137, 5 July 2011;Yasin Ates v. Turkey, no. 30949\/96, \u00a7 135, 31 May 2005;Yatsenko v. Ukraine, no. 75345\/01, \u00a7 40, 16 February 2012;Zubayrayev v. Russia, no. 67797\/01, \u00a7\u00a7 74-77, 10 January 2008", "external_sources": "Articles 26, 27 and 28 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties of 23 May 1969", "conclusion": "Preliminary objection allowed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione temporis;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 38 - Examination of the case-{general} (Article 38 - Obligation to furnish all necessary facilities);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed;Non-pecuniary damage - claim dismissed", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Alvina Gyulumyan;Anatoly Kovler;Corneliu B\u00eersan;Dean Spielmann;Dmitry Dedov;Ganna Yudkivska;Guido Raimondi;Helen Keller;Helena J\u00e4derblom;Ineta Ziemele;Isabelle Berro-Lef\u00e8vre;Josep Casadevall;Julia Laffranque;Karel Jungwiert;Khanlar Hajiyev;Kristina Pardalos;Krzysztof Wojtyczek;Luis L\u00f3pez Guerra;Mark Villiger;Peer Lorenzen;Vincent A. De Gaetano", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1021JUD005550807" }, "402": { "webcast_id": "5550807_13022013", "hearing_date": "2013-02-13 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Janowiec and Others v. Russia (nos. 55508\/07 and 29520\/09)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "29520\/09", "case_id": "001-110513", "case_name": "CASE OF JANOWIEC AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-110513", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2012-04-16 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 2, "court": "23", "issue": "Articles 24 and 42 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Law no. 174-FZ of 18 December 2001) ; Sections 1, 3 and 4 of the Rehabilitation Act (Law no. 1761-I of 18 October 1991) ; Section 7 of the State Secrets Act (Law no. 5485-I of 21 July 1993) ; Regulation on preparing State secret information for transfer to foreign states and international organisations (no. 973) ; Articles 78 and 356 of the Criminal Code (Law no. 63-FZ of 13 June 1996)", "represented_by": "SZEWCZYK J. ; KAMINSKI I. ; NOWOSIELSKI R. ; SOCHANSKI B. ; KARPINSKIY R. ; STAVITSKAYA A.", "respondent": "RUS", "articles": "2;2-1;3;35;35-3-a;38;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "A\u00e7is v. Turkey, no. 7050\/05, 1 February 2011;Agache and Others v. Romania, no. 2712\/02, 20 October 2009;Association 21 December 1989 and Others v. Romania, nos. 33810\/07 and 18817\/08, 24 May 2011;Bazorkina v. Russia, no. 69481\/01, \u00a7 139, 27 July 2006;Bekirski v. Bulgaria, no. 71420\/01, 2 September 2010;Blecic v. Croatia [GC], no. 59532\/00, ECHR 2006-III;Brecknell v. the United Kingdom, no. 32457\/04, 27 November 2007;Byrzykowski v. Poland, no. 11562\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 86 and 94-118, 27 June 2006;\u00c7akici v. Turkey [GC], no. 23657\/94, \u00a7 98, ECHR 1999-IV;Calvelli and Ciglio v. Italy [GC], no. 32967\/96, \u00a7 \u00a7 41-57, ECHR 2002-I;Dalban v. Romania [GC], no. 28114\/95, \u00a7 39, ECHR 1999-VI;Davydov and Others v. Ukraine, nos. 17674\/02 and 39081\/02, 1 July 2010;Enukidze and Girgvliani v. Georgia, no. 25091\/07, 26 April 2011;Garaudy v. France, (dec.), no. 65831\/01, ECHR 2003-IX (extracts);Gongadze v. Ukraine, no. 34056\/02, ECHR 2005-XI;Imakayeva v. Russia, no. 7615\/02, \u00a7 165, ECHR 2006-XIII (extracts);Ireland v. the United Kingdom, 18 January 1978, \u00a7 210, Series A no. 25;Jularic v. Croatia, no. 20106\/06, 20 January 2011;Karner v. Austria, no. 40016\/98, \u00a7 25, ECHR 2003-IX;Lapusan and Others v. Romania, nos. 29007\/06, etc., \u00a7 59, 8 March 2011;Lehideux and Isorni v. France, 23 September 1998, \u00a7 53, Reports 1998-VII;Lukanov v. Bulgaria, 20 March 1997, \u00a7 40, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-II;Luluyev and Others v. Russia, no. 69480\/01, ECHR 2006-XIII (extracts);Lyubov Efimenko v. Ukraine, no. 75726\/01, 25 November 2010;Medova v. Russia, no. 25385\/04, \u00a7 76, 15 January 2009;Musikhanova and Others v. Russia, no. 27243\/03, 4 December 2008;Nachova and Others v. Bulgaria [GC], nos. 43577\/98 and 43579\/98, \u00a7\u00a7 110-113, ECHR 2005-VII;Nevmerzhitsky v. Ukraine, no. 54825\/00, \u00a7 77, ECHR 2005-II (extracts);Nolan and K. v. Russia, no. 2512\/04, 12 February 2009;Orban and Others v. France, no. 20985\/05, 15 January 2009;Orhan v. Turkey, no. 25656\/94, 18 June 2002;Osmanoglu v. Turkey, no. 48804\/99, \u00a7 96, 24 January 2008;Sandru and Others v. Romania, no. 22465\/03, 8 December 2009;Sasita Israilova and Others v. Russia, no. 35079\/04, \u00a7 145, 28 October 2010;Schedko v. Belarus, No. 886\/1999, 3 April 2003;\u0160ilih v. Slovenia, [GC], no. 71463\/01, 9 April 2009;Tanis and Others v. Turkey, no. 65899\/01, \u00a7 219, ECHR 2005-VIII;;Tanrikulu v. Turkey [GC], no. 23763\/94, \u00a7 70, ECHR 1999-IV;Taymuskhanovy v. Russia, no. 11528\/07, \u00a7 122, 16 December 2010;Tigran Ayrapetyan v. Russia, no. 75472\/01, \u00a7 64, 16 September 2010;Timurtas v. Turkey, no. 23531\/94, , ECHR 2000-VI;Trubnikov v. Russia, no. 49790\/99, \u00a7\u00a7 50-57, 5 July 2005;Varnava and Others v. Turkey ([GC], nos. 16064\/90, 16065\/90, etc., ECHR 2009-...;Velikova v. Bulgaria, no. 41488\/98, \u00a7 77, ECHR 2000-VI", "external_sources": "The Convention (IV) respecting the Laws and Customs of War on Land and its annex: Regulations concerning the Laws and Customs of War on Land (The Hague, 18 October 1907);The Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War (Geneva, 27 July 1929);Principle VI in the Principles of International Law Recognized in the Charter of the Nuremberg Tribunal;Convention on the Non-Applicability of Statutory Limitations to War Crimes and Crimes Against Humanity (26 November 1968);Articles 26-28 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (23 May 1969);Human Rights Committee\u2019s General Comment No. 31 [80], The Nature of the General Legal Obligation Imposed on States Parties to the Covenant, adopted on 29 March 2004;Article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights", "conclusion": "Preliminary objection allowed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione temporis;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;Violation of Article 38 - Examination of the case-{general} (Article 38 - Obligation to furnish all necessary facilities);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Anatoly Kovler;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Dean Spielmann;Ganna Yudkivska;Karel Jungwiert;Mark Villiger", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0416JUD005550807" }, "403": { "webcast_id": "5550807_13022013", "hearing_date": "2013-02-13 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Janowiec and Others v. Russia (nos. 55508\/07 and 29520\/09)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "29520\/09", "case_id": "001-105727", "case_name": "JANOWIEC AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-105727", "type": "DECISIONS", "typedescription": 8, "document_date": "", "collection": "CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "23", "issue": "", "represented_by": "SZEWCZYK J.", "respondent": "RUS", "articles": "2;3;6;8;13", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Partly admissible;Partly inadmissible", "separate_opinion": "", "judges": "Anatoly Kovler;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Dean Spielmann;Isabelle Berro-Lef\u00e8vre;Karel Jungwiert;Mark Villiger", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0705DEC005550807" }, "404": { "webcast_id": "5603007_30012013", "hearing_date": "2013-01-30 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Fernandez Martinez v. Spain (no. 56030\/07)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "56030\/07", "case_id": "001-145068", "case_name": "CASE OF FERN\u00c1NDEZ MART\u00cdNEZ v. SPAIN", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-145068", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2014-06-12 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Agreement of 3 January 1979 between Spain and the Holy See on education and cultural affairs ; Order of 11 October 1982 on teachers of Catholic religion and ethics in secondary educational centres ; Canons 804 and 805 of the Code of Canon Law ; Article 16 \u00a7 3 of the Constitution", "represented_by": "MAZON COSTA J.L.", "respondent": "ESP", "articles": "8;8-1;8-2;9;9-1;10;10-1;11;11-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Bigaeva v. Greece, no 26713\/05, \u00a7 23, 28 May 2009;C.G. and Others v. Bulgaria, no 1365\/07, \u00a7 39, 24 April 2008;Christine Goodwin v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 28957\/95, \u00a7 90, ECHR 2002 VI;Coster v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 24876\/94, \u00a7 104, 18 January 2001;Elsholz v. Germany [GC], no 25735\/94, \u00a7 52, ECHR 2000 VIII;Evans v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 6339\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 75-76, ECHR 2007 IV;Fuentes Bobo v. Spain, no 39293\/98, \u00a7 38, 29 February 2000;Hasan and Chaush v. Bulgaria [GC], no 30985\/96, ECHR 2000 XI;Holy Synod of the Bulgarian Orthodox Church (Metropolitan Inokentiy) and Others v. Bulgaria, nos. 412\/03 and 35677\/04, \u00a7 10, 22 January 2009;Kopp v. Switzerland, 25 March 1998, \u00a7 55, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 II;Leyla \u015eahin v. Turkey [GC], no 44774\/98, ECHR 2005 XI;Lombardi Vallauri v. Italy, no 39128\/05, 20 October 2009;Mart\u00ednez Mart\u00ednez v. Spain, no 21532\/08, \u00a7 57, 18 October 2011;Metropolitan Church of Bessarabia and Others v. Moldova, no. 45701\/99, \u00a7 118, ECHR 2001 XII;Miro\u013cubovs and Others v. Latvia, no 798\/05, 15 September 2009;M\u00f3\u0142ka v. Poland (dec.), no 56550\/00, ECHR 2006 IV;Neulinger and Shuruk v. Switzerland [GC], no 41615\/07, \u00a7 99, ECHR 2010;Niemietz v. Germany, 16 December 1992, \u00a7 29, Series A no 251 B;Obst v. Germany, no 425\/03, 23 September 2010;Oleksandr Volkov v. Ukraine, no 21722\/11, \u00a7 165-167, ECHR 2013;\u00d6zp\u0131nar v. Turkey, no 20999\/04, \u00a7\u00a7 43-48, 19 October 2010;Pretty v. the United Kingdom, no 2346\/02, \u00a7 61, ECHR 2002 III;S. and Marper v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 30562\/04 and 30566\/04, \u00a7\u00a7 101-102, ECHR 2008;Sahin v. Germany [GC], no 30943\/96, \u00a7 68, ECHR 2003 VIII;Sch\u00fcth v. Germany, no 1620\/03, ECHR 2010;Siebenhaar v. Germany, no 18136\/02, 3 February 2011;Sindicatul \u201cP\u0103storul cel Bun\u201d v. Romania [GC], no 2330\/09, 9 July 2013;Svyato-Mykhaylivska Parafiya v. Ukraine, no 77703\/01, \u00a7 146, 14 June 2007;Von Hannover v. Germany (no 2) [GC], nos. 40660\/08 and 60641\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 104-107, ECHR 2012;W. v. the United Kingdom, 8 July 1987, \u00a7\u00a7 62 and 64, Series A no 121", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Alejandro Saiz Arnaiz;Alvina Gyulumyan;Andr\u00e1s Saj\u00f3;Andr\u00e9 Potocki;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Ann Power-Forde;Corneliu B\u00eersan;Dean Spielmann;Dmitry Dedov;Egbert Myjer;George Nicolaou;Guido Raimondi;Helena J\u00e4derblom;Ineta Ziemele;Isabelle Berro-Lef\u00e8vre;J\u00e1n \u0160ikuta;Josep Casadevall;Luis L\u00f3pez Guerra;Mark Villiger;Mihai Poalelungi;Paul Lemmens", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0612JUD005603007" }, "405": { "webcast_id": "5603007_30012013", "hearing_date": "2013-01-30 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Fernandez Martinez v. Spain (no. 56030\/07)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "56030\/07", "case_id": "001-110916", "case_name": "CASE OF FERN\u00c1NDEZ MART\u00cdNEZ v. SPAIN", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-110916", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2012-05-15 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 3, "court": "6", "issue": "Article 16 \u00a7 3 of the Constitution ; Canon 805 of the Code of Canon Law", "represented_by": "MAZON COSTA J.L.", "respondent": "ESP", "articles": "8;8-1;35", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Ahtinen v. Finland, no 48907\/99, \u00a7 41, 23 September 2008;Bigaeva v. Greece, no 26713\/05, \u00a7 23, 28 May 2009;Campagnano v. Italy, no 77955\/01, \u00a7 53, ECHR 2006-V;Christine Goodwin v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 28957\/95, \u00a7 90, ECHR 2002-VI;Dahlab v. Switzerland (dec.), no 42393\/98, ECHR 2001-V;Evans v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 6339\/05, ECHR 2007-IV;Fuentes Bobo v. Spain, no 39293\/98, \u00a7 38, 29 February 2000;Gatt v. Malta, no 28221\/08, \u00a7 19, 27 July 2010;Hasan and Chaush v. Bulgaria [GC], no 30985\/96, \u00a7\u00a7 62 and 78, ECHR 2000-XI;Jusic v. Switzerland, no 4691\/06, \u00a7 99, 2 December 2010;K.A. and A.D. v. Belgium, no 42758\/98 and 45558\/99, \u00a7 83, 17 February 2005;Leyla Sahin v. Turkey [GC], no 44774\/98, \u00a7 108, ECHR 2005-XI;Lombardi Vallauri v. Italy, no 39128\/05, \u00a7 38, 20 October 2009;Lombardi Vallauri v. Italy, no 39128\/05, \u00a7 41, 20 October 2009;M\u00f3lka v. Poland (dec.), no 56550\/00, ECHR 2006-IV;Niemietz v. Germany, 16 December 1992, \u00a7 29, Series A no 251-B;Obst v. Germany, no 425\/03, 23 September 2010;Pretty v. the United Kingdom, no 2346\/02, \u00a7 61, ECHR 2002-III;Rommelfanger v. Germany, no 12242\/86, decision of the Commission du 6 September 1989, Decisions and Reports no 62;Sch\u00fcth v. Germany, no 1620\/03, ECHR 2010;Sidabras and D\u017eiautas v. Lithuania, nos. 55480\/00 and 59330\/00, \u00a7 43, ECHR 2004-VIII;Siebenhaar v. Germany, no 18136\/02, 3 February 2011;Smirnova v. Russia, nos. 46133\/99 and 48183\/99, \u00a7 95, ECHR 2003-IX (extracts);Svyato-Mykhaylivska Parafiya v. Ukraine, no 77703\/01, \u00a7 146, 14 June 2007", "external_sources": "Directive 2000\/78\/EC establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation", "conclusion": "Remainder inadmissible;No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Alejandro Saiz Arnaiz;Alvina Gyulumyan;Corneliu B\u00eersan;Egbert Myjer;Ineta Ziemele;Josep Casadevall;Luis L\u00f3pez Guerra;Mihai Poalelungi", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0515JUD005603007" }, "406": { "webcast_id": "2938109_16012013", "hearing_date": "2013-01-16 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Vallianatos and Others v. Greece (nos. 29381\/09, 32684\/09)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "29381\/09", "case_id": "001-128294", "case_name": "CASE OF VALLIANATOS AND OTHERS v. GREECE", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-128294", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2013-11-07 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Sections 1-11 and 13 of Law no. 3719\/2008 ; Articles 57, 59, 914, 932 and 1444 of the Civil Code ; Sections 104 and 105 of the Introductory Law to the Civil Code", "represented_by": "GREEK HELSINKI MONITOR ; ALIVIZATOS N. ; MALLIOS E.", "respondent": "GRC", "articles": "8;8-1;14;14+8;34;35;35-1;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Abdulaziz, Cabales and Balkandali v. the United Kingdom, 28 May 1985, \u00a7 82, Series A no 94;Akdivar and Others v. Turkey, 16 September 1996, \u00a7 71, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-IV;Anakomba Yula v. Belgium, no 45413\/07, \u00a7 22, 10 March 2009;Burden v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 13378\/05, \u00a7 60, ECHR 2008;Carabulea v. Romania, no 45661\/99, \u00a7 180, 13 July 2010;Christine Goodwin v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 28957\/95, \u00a7 75, ECHR 2002-VI;Creanga v. Romania [GC], no 29226\/03, \u00a7 130, 23 February 2012;Defalque v. Belgium, no 37330\/02, \u00a7 46, 20 April 2006;Dudgeon v. the United Kingdom, 22 October 1981, Series A no 45;E.B. v. France [GC], no 43546\/02, 22 January 2008;F. v. Switzerland, 18 December 1987, \u00a7 33, Series A no 128;F\u00e9d\u00e9ration chr\u00e9tienne des T\u00e9moins de J\u00e9hovah de France v. France (dec.), no 53430\/99, 6 November 2001;Fressoz and Roire v. France [GC], no 29183\/95, \u00a7 37, ECHR 1999-I;Frett\u00e9 v. France, no 36515\/97, ECHR 2002-I;Gas and Dubois v. France, no 25951\/07, 15 March 2012;Gorraiz Lizarraga and Others v. Spain, no 62543\/00, \u00a7 35, ECHR 2004-III;Hasan and Chaush v. Bulgaria [GC], no 30985\/96, \u00a7\u00a7 96-98, ECHR 2000-XI;Karner v. Austria, no 40016\/98, ECHR 2003-IX;Kozak v. Poland, no 13102\/02, 2 March 2010;Kudla v. Poland [GC], no 30210\/96, \u00a7 152, ECHR 2000-XI;L. v. Lithuania, no 27527\/03, \u00a7\u00a7 35-36, ECHR 2007-IV;L. and V. v. Austria, nos. 39392\/98 and 39829\/98, ECHR 2003-I;Manoussakis and Others v. Greece, 26 September 1996, \u00a7 33, Reports 1996-IV;McFarlane v. Ireland [GC], no 31333\/06, \u00a7 107, 10 September 2010;Modinos v. Cyprus, 22 April 1993, Series A no 259;Norris v. Ireland, 26 October 1988, Series A no 142;P.B. and J.S. v. Austria, no 18984\/02, 22 July 2010;Paksas v. Lithuania [GC], no 34932\/04, 6 January 2011, \u00a7 114;Petrovic v. Austria, 27 March 1998, \u00a7 22, Reports 1998-II;Roche v. the United Kingdom [GC], 19 October 2005, no 32555\/96, \u00a7 137, ECHR 2005-X;Salgueiro da Silva Mouta v. Portugal, no 33290\/96, ECHR 1999-IX;Sampanis and Others v. Greece, no 32526\/05, \u00a7 58, 5 June 2008;SARL du Parc d\u2019Activit\u00e9s de Blotzheim v. France, no 72377\/01, \u00a7 20, 11 July 2006;Schalk and Kopf v. Austria, no 30141\/04, ECHR 2010;Smith and Grady v. the United Kingdom, nos. 33985\/96 and 33986\/96, ECHR 1999-VI;Soto Sanchez v. Spain, no 66990\/01, \u00a7 34, 25 November 2003;Tourkiki Enosi Xanthis and Others v. Greece, no 26698\/05, \u00a7 38, 27 March 2008;Tyrer v. the United Kingdom, 25 April 1978, \u00a7 31, Series A no 26;X and Others v. Austria [GC], no 19010\/07, 19 February 2013", "external_sources": "Recommendation 924 (1981) of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe on discrimination against homosexuals;Recommendation 1474 (2000) of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe on the situation of lesbians and gays in Council of Europe member states;Recommendation 1470 (2000) of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe on the situation of gays and lesbians and their partners in respect of asylum and immigration in the member states of the Council of Europe;Resolution 1728 (2010) of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe of 29 April 2010 entitled \u201cDiscrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity\u201d;Recommendation of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe CM\/Rec(2010)5 on measures to combat discrimination on grounds of sexual orientation or gender identity;Articles 7, 9 and 21 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union;Articles 4 and 5 of European Council Directive 2003\/86\/EC of 22 September 2003 on the right to family reunification;Article 2 of Directive 2004\/38\/EC of the European Parliament and Council of 29 April 2004", "conclusion": "Preliminary objection partially allowed (Article 34 - Victim);Preliminary objection partially dismissed (Article 34 - Victim);Preliminary objection dismissed (Article 35-1 - Exhaustion of domestic remedies);Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 14+8 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life;Article 8-1 - Respect for family life;Respect for private life);Non-pecuniary damage - award", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Ale\u0161 Pejchal;Andr\u00e9 Potocki;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Dean Spielmann;Elisabeth Steiner;Erik M\u00f8se;Guido Raimondi;Ineta Ziemele;Isabelle Berro-Lef\u00e8vre;Josep Casadevall;Julia Laffranque;Ledi Bianku;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Mark Villiger;Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska;Paulo Pinto De Albuquerque;Peer Lorenzen", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1107JUD002938109" }, "407": { "webcast_id": "2938109_16012013", "hearing_date": "2013-01-16 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Vallianatos and Others v. Greece (nos. 29381\/09, 32684\/09)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "32684\/09", "case_id": "001-128294", "case_name": "CASE OF VALLIANATOS AND OTHERS v. GREECE", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-128294", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2013-11-07 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Sections 1-11 and 13 of Law no. 3719\/2008 ; Articles 57, 59, 914, 932 and 1444 of the Civil Code ; Sections 104 and 105 of the Introductory Law to the Civil Code", "represented_by": "GREEK HELSINKI MONITOR ; ALIVIZATOS N. ; MALLIOS E.", "respondent": "GRC", "articles": "8;8-1;14;14+8;34;35;35-1;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Abdulaziz, Cabales and Balkandali v. the United Kingdom, 28 May 1985, \u00a7 82, Series A no 94;Akdivar and Others v. Turkey, 16 September 1996, \u00a7 71, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-IV;Anakomba Yula v. Belgium, no 45413\/07, \u00a7 22, 10 March 2009;Burden v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 13378\/05, \u00a7 60, ECHR 2008;Carabulea v. Romania, no 45661\/99, \u00a7 180, 13 July 2010;Christine Goodwin v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 28957\/95, \u00a7 75, ECHR 2002-VI;Creanga v. Romania [GC], no 29226\/03, \u00a7 130, 23 February 2012;Defalque v. Belgium, no 37330\/02, \u00a7 46, 20 April 2006;Dudgeon v. the United Kingdom, 22 October 1981, Series A no 45;E.B. v. France [GC], no 43546\/02, 22 January 2008;F. v. Switzerland, 18 December 1987, \u00a7 33, Series A no 128;F\u00e9d\u00e9ration chr\u00e9tienne des T\u00e9moins de J\u00e9hovah de France v. France (dec.), no 53430\/99, 6 November 2001;Fressoz and Roire v. France [GC], no 29183\/95, \u00a7 37, ECHR 1999-I;Frett\u00e9 v. France, no 36515\/97, ECHR 2002-I;Gas and Dubois v. France, no 25951\/07, 15 March 2012;Gorraiz Lizarraga and Others v. Spain, no 62543\/00, \u00a7 35, ECHR 2004-III;Hasan and Chaush v. Bulgaria [GC], no 30985\/96, \u00a7\u00a7 96-98, ECHR 2000-XI;Karner v. Austria, no 40016\/98, ECHR 2003-IX;Kozak v. Poland, no 13102\/02, 2 March 2010;Kudla v. Poland [GC], no 30210\/96, \u00a7 152, ECHR 2000-XI;L. v. Lithuania, no 27527\/03, \u00a7\u00a7 35-36, ECHR 2007-IV;L. and V. v. Austria, nos. 39392\/98 and 39829\/98, ECHR 2003-I;Manoussakis and Others v. Greece, 26 September 1996, \u00a7 33, Reports 1996-IV;McFarlane v. Ireland [GC], no 31333\/06, \u00a7 107, 10 September 2010;Modinos v. Cyprus, 22 April 1993, Series A no 259;Norris v. Ireland, 26 October 1988, Series A no 142;P.B. and J.S. v. Austria, no 18984\/02, 22 July 2010;Paksas v. Lithuania [GC], no 34932\/04, 6 January 2011, \u00a7 114;Petrovic v. Austria, 27 March 1998, \u00a7 22, Reports 1998-II;Roche v. the United Kingdom [GC], 19 October 2005, no 32555\/96, \u00a7 137, ECHR 2005-X;Salgueiro da Silva Mouta v. Portugal, no 33290\/96, ECHR 1999-IX;Sampanis and Others v. Greece, no 32526\/05, \u00a7 58, 5 June 2008;SARL du Parc d\u2019Activit\u00e9s de Blotzheim v. France, no 72377\/01, \u00a7 20, 11 July 2006;Schalk and Kopf v. Austria, no 30141\/04, ECHR 2010;Smith and Grady v. the United Kingdom, nos. 33985\/96 and 33986\/96, ECHR 1999-VI;Soto Sanchez v. Spain, no 66990\/01, \u00a7 34, 25 November 2003;Tourkiki Enosi Xanthis and Others v. Greece, no 26698\/05, \u00a7 38, 27 March 2008;Tyrer v. the United Kingdom, 25 April 1978, \u00a7 31, Series A no 26;X and Others v. Austria [GC], no 19010\/07, 19 February 2013", "external_sources": "Recommendation 924 (1981) of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe on discrimination against homosexuals;Recommendation 1474 (2000) of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe on the situation of lesbians and gays in Council of Europe member states;Recommendation 1470 (2000) of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe on the situation of gays and lesbians and their partners in respect of asylum and immigration in the member states of the Council of Europe;Resolution 1728 (2010) of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe of 29 April 2010 entitled \u201cDiscrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity\u201d;Recommendation of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe CM\/Rec(2010)5 on measures to combat discrimination on grounds of sexual orientation or gender identity;Articles 7, 9 and 21 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union;Articles 4 and 5 of European Council Directive 2003\/86\/EC of 22 September 2003 on the right to family reunification;Article 2 of Directive 2004\/38\/EC of the European Parliament and Council of 29 April 2004", "conclusion": "Preliminary objection partially allowed (Article 34 - Victim);Preliminary objection partially dismissed (Article 34 - Victim);Preliminary objection dismissed (Article 35-1 - Exhaustion of domestic remedies);Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 14+8 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life;Article 8-1 - Respect for family life;Respect for private life);Non-pecuniary damage - award", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Ale\u0161 Pejchal;Andr\u00e9 Potocki;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Dean Spielmann;Elisabeth Steiner;Erik M\u00f8se;Guido Raimondi;Ineta Ziemele;Isabelle Berro-Lef\u00e8vre;Josep Casadevall;Julia Laffranque;Ledi Bianku;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Mark Villiger;Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska;Paulo Pinto De Albuquerque;Peer Lorenzen", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1107JUD002938109" }, "408": { "webcast_id": "231208_12122012", "hearing_date": "2012-12-12 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Maktouf and Damjanovic v. Bosnia and Herzegovina (nos. 2312\/08 and 34179\/08)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "2312\/08", "case_id": "001-122716", "case_name": "CASE OF MAKTOUF AND DAMJANOVI\u0106 v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-122716", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2013-07-18 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Articles 24 \u00a7 1, 37 \u00a7 2, 38 \u00a7 1 and \u00a7 2 , 43 \u00a7 1 and 142 \u00a7 1 of the 1976 Criminal Code ; Articles 31 \u00a7 1, 42 \u00a7\u00a7 1 and 2, 49, 50 \u00a7 1 and 173 \u00a7 1 of the 2003 Criminal Code", "represented_by": "LOZO A. ; MEHIC I.", "respondent": "BIH", "articles": "6;6-1;7;7-1;14;35;35-1;41;P12-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Achour v. France [GC], no. 67335\/01, \u00a7 44, ECHR 2006-IV;Akdivar and Others v. Turkey, 16 September 1996, \u00a7\u00a7 65-69, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-IV;Brudnicka and Others v. Poland, no. 54723\/00, \u00a7 38, ECHR 2005-II;Camilleri v. Malta, no. 42931\/10, 22 January 2013;Campbell and Fell v. the United Kingdom, 28 June 1984, \u00a7 78, Series A no. 80;Ecer and Zeyrek v. Turkey, nos. 29295\/95 and 29363\/95, ECHR 2001-II;Flux v. Moldova (no. 2), no. 31001\/03, \u00a7 27, 3 July 2007;Gabarri Moreno v. Spain, no. 68066\/01, 22 July 2003;Henryk Urban and Ryszard Urban v. Poland, no. 23614\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 45-53, 30 November 2010;Jamil v. France, 8 June 1995, Series A no. 317-B;Karmo v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 76965\/01, 9 February 2006;Kononov v. Latvia [GC], no. 36376\/04, ECHR 2010;Magee v. the United Kingdom, no. 28135\/95, \u00a7 50, ECHR 2000 VI;Mirazovic v. Bosnia and Herzegovina (dec.), no. 13628\/03, 6 May 2006;Ould Dah v. France (dec.), no. 13113\/03, ECHR 2009;Palic v. Bosnia and Herzegovina, no. 4704\/04, 15 February 2011;S.W. v. the United Kingdom, 22 November 1995, Series A no. 335-B;Scoppola v. Italy (no. 2) [GC], no. 10249\/03, 17 September 2009;Sejdic and Finci v. Bosnia and Herzegovina [GC], nos. 27996\/06 and 34836\/06, \u00a7 55, ECHR 2009;\u0160im\u0161ic v. Bosnia and Herzegovina (dec.), no. 51552\/10, 10 April 2012;Stafford v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 46295\/99, \u00a7 78, ECHR 2002-IV;Streletz, Kessler and Krenz v. Germany [GC], nos. 34044\/96, 35532\/97 and 44801\/98, ECHR 2001-II", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 7 - No punishment without law (Article 7-1 - Heavier penalty;Retroactivity);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed;Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;David Th\u00f3r Bj\u00f6rgvinsson;Dean Spielmann;George Nicolaou;Guido Raimondi;Ineta Ziemele;Isabelle Berro-Lef\u00e8vre;Johannes Silvis;Josep Casadevall;Kristina Pardalos;Lech Garlicki;Mark Villiger;Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska;Neboj\u0161a Vu\u010dini\u0107;Nona Tsotsoria;P\u00e4ivi Hirvel\u00e4;Paulo Pinto De Albuquerque;Zdravka Kalaydjieva", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0718JUD000231208" }, "409": { "webcast_id": "231208_12122012", "hearing_date": "2012-12-12 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Maktouf and Damjanovic v. Bosnia and Herzegovina (nos. 2312\/08 and 34179\/08)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "2312\/08", "case_id": "001-112346", "case_name": "MAKTOUF v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-112346", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "2010-08-31 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "LOZO A. ; MEHIC I.", "respondent": "BIH", "articles": "6;6-1;7;7-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Communicated", "separate_opinion": "FALSE", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "410": { "webcast_id": "231208_12122012", "hearing_date": "2012-12-12 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Maktouf and Damjanovic v. Bosnia and Herzegovina (nos. 2312\/08 and 34179\/08)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "34179\/08", "case_id": "001-122716", "case_name": "CASE OF MAKTOUF AND DAMJANOVI\u0106 v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-122716", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2013-07-18 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Articles 24 \u00a7 1, 37 \u00a7 2, 38 \u00a7 1 and \u00a7 2 , 43 \u00a7 1 and 142 \u00a7 1 of the 1976 Criminal Code ; Articles 31 \u00a7 1, 42 \u00a7\u00a7 1 and 2, 49, 50 \u00a7 1 and 173 \u00a7 1 of the 2003 Criminal Code", "represented_by": "LOZO A. ; MEHIC I.", "respondent": "BIH", "articles": "6;6-1;7;7-1;14;35;35-1;41;P12-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Achour v. France [GC], no. 67335\/01, \u00a7 44, ECHR 2006-IV;Akdivar and Others v. Turkey, 16 September 1996, \u00a7\u00a7 65-69, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-IV;Brudnicka and Others v. Poland, no. 54723\/00, \u00a7 38, ECHR 2005-II;Camilleri v. Malta, no. 42931\/10, 22 January 2013;Campbell and Fell v. the United Kingdom, 28 June 1984, \u00a7 78, Series A no. 80;Ecer and Zeyrek v. Turkey, nos. 29295\/95 and 29363\/95, ECHR 2001-II;Flux v. Moldova (no. 2), no. 31001\/03, \u00a7 27, 3 July 2007;Gabarri Moreno v. Spain, no. 68066\/01, 22 July 2003;Henryk Urban and Ryszard Urban v. Poland, no. 23614\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 45-53, 30 November 2010;Jamil v. France, 8 June 1995, Series A no. 317-B;Karmo v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 76965\/01, 9 February 2006;Kononov v. Latvia [GC], no. 36376\/04, ECHR 2010;Magee v. the United Kingdom, no. 28135\/95, \u00a7 50, ECHR 2000 VI;Mirazovic v. Bosnia and Herzegovina (dec.), no. 13628\/03, 6 May 2006;Ould Dah v. France (dec.), no. 13113\/03, ECHR 2009;Palic v. Bosnia and Herzegovina, no. 4704\/04, 15 February 2011;S.W. v. the United Kingdom, 22 November 1995, Series A no. 335-B;Scoppola v. Italy (no. 2) [GC], no. 10249\/03, 17 September 2009;Sejdic and Finci v. Bosnia and Herzegovina [GC], nos. 27996\/06 and 34836\/06, \u00a7 55, ECHR 2009;\u0160im\u0161ic v. Bosnia and Herzegovina (dec.), no. 51552\/10, 10 April 2012;Stafford v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 46295\/99, \u00a7 78, ECHR 2002-IV;Streletz, Kessler and Krenz v. Germany [GC], nos. 34044\/96, 35532\/97 and 44801\/98, ECHR 2001-II", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 7 - No punishment without law (Article 7-1 - Heavier penalty;Retroactivity);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed;Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;David Th\u00f3r Bj\u00f6rgvinsson;Dean Spielmann;George Nicolaou;Guido Raimondi;Ineta Ziemele;Isabelle Berro-Lef\u00e8vre;Johannes Silvis;Josep Casadevall;Kristina Pardalos;Lech Garlicki;Mark Villiger;Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska;Neboj\u0161a Vu\u010dini\u0107;Nona Tsotsoria;P\u00e4ivi Hirvel\u00e4;Paulo Pinto De Albuquerque;Zdravka Kalaydjieva", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0718JUD000231208" }, "411": { "webcast_id": "6606909_28112012", "hearing_date": "2012-11-28 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Vinter and Others v. United Kingdom (no. 66069\/09, 130\/10 et 3896\/10)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "66069\/09", "case_id": "001-122664", "case_name": "CASE OF VINTER AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-122664", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2013-07-09 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "The Criminal Justice Act 2003 ; The 1998 Human Rights Act", "represented_by": "CREIGHTON S. ; WEATHERBY P. ; VAN ZYL SMIT D. ; WOODS B. ; HORWELL R. ; HINDMARSH L. ; CHIVERS SOLICITORS, BINGLEY ; McKONE M.", "respondent": "GBR", "articles": "3;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Boulois v. Luxembourg [GC], no. 37575\/04, \u00a7 83, ECHR 2012;Choreftakis and Choreftaki v. Greece, no. 46846\/08, \u00a7 45, 17 January 2012;Dickson v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 44362\/04, \u00a7 75, ECHR 2007-V;Gillberg v. Sweden [GC], no. 41723\/06, \u00a7 53, 3 April 2012;Kafkaris v. Cyprus, [GC], no. 21906\/04, ECHR 2008-...;Maiorano and Others v. Italy, no. 28634\/06, 15 December 2009;Mastromatteo v. Italy [GC], no. 37703\/97, \u00a7 72, ECHR 2002-VIII;Pretty v. the United Kingdom, no. 2346\/02, \u00a7 65, ECHR 2002-III;Sawoniuk v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 63716\/00, ECHR 2001-VI;T. v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 24724\/94, 16 December 1999;V. v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 24888\/94, ECHR 1999-IX;V.C. v. Slovakia, no. 18968\/07, \u00a7 105, ECHR 2011 (extracts)", "external_sources": "Rule 103 of the European Prison Rules;COE Committee of Ministers Resolution 76(2);COE Committee of Ministers Recommendation 2003(23) (on the management by prison administrations of life sentence and other long-term prisoners);\nCOE Committee of Ministers Recommendation 2003(22) (on conditional release);The United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners;Article 10 \u00a7 3 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights;Article 110(4) and (5) of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court;Rules 223 and 224 of the ICC\u2019s Rules of Procedure and Evidence;The CPT\u2019s report on its visit to Switzerland from 10-20 October 2011 (25 October 2012 CPT\/Inf (2012) 26)", "conclusion": "Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading punishment;Inhuman punishment) (Substantive aspect);Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Andr\u00e1s Saj\u00f3;Ann Power-Forde;David Th\u00f3r Bj\u00f6rgvinsson;Dean Spielmann;George Nicolaou;Guido Raimondi;Ineta Ziemele;Isabelle Berro-Lef\u00e8vre;Johannes Silvis;Josep Casadevall;Lech Garlicki;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Luis L\u00f3pez Guerra;Mark Villiger;Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska;Neboj\u0161a Vu\u010dini\u0107;Nona Tsotsoria;Paul Lemmens;Paul Mahoney", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0709JUD006606909" }, "412": { "webcast_id": "6606909_28112012", "hearing_date": "2012-11-28 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Vinter and Others v. United Kingdom (no. 66069\/09, 130\/10 et 3896\/10)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "66069\/09", "case_id": "001-108610", "case_name": "CASE OF VINTER AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-108610", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2012-01-17 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 3, "court": "7", "issue": "", "represented_by": "CREIGHTON S. ; WOODS B. ; Chivers Solicitors", "respondent": "GBR", "articles": "3;35", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Hussain v. the United Kingdom and Prem Singh v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1996, Reports 1996-I at paragraphs 53 and 61;Kafkaris v. Cyprus (no. 2) (dec.), no. 9644\/09, 21 June 2011;Soering v. the United Kingdom, 7 July 1989, \u00a7 104, Series A no. 161;Stafford v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 46295\/99, ECHR 2002-IV", "external_sources": "Articles 77 and 110 of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court", "conclusion": "Remainder inadmissible;No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading punishment;Inhuman punishment) (Substantive aspect)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "David Th\u00f3r Bj\u00f6rgvinsson;George Nicolaou;Lech Garlicki;Ledi Bianku;Nicolas Bratza;P\u00e4ivi Hirvel\u00e4;Vincent A. De Gaetano", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0117JUD006606909" }, "413": { "webcast_id": "6606909_28112012", "hearing_date": "2012-11-28 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Vinter and Others v. United Kingdom (no. 66069\/09, 130\/10 et 3896\/10)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "66069\/09", "case_id": "001-111247", "case_name": "VINTER v. THE UNITED KINGDOM", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-111247", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "2011-02-01 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "BHATT M.", "respondent": "GBR", "articles": "3;5;5-4;7", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "", "separate_opinion": "FALSE", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "414": { "webcast_id": "6606909_28112012", "hearing_date": "2012-11-28 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Vinter and Others v. United Kingdom (no. 66069\/09, 130\/10 et 3896\/10)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "130\/10", "case_id": "001-122664", "case_name": "CASE OF VINTER AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-122664", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2013-07-09 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "The Criminal Justice Act 2003 ; The 1998 Human Rights Act", "represented_by": "CREIGHTON S. ; WEATHERBY P. ; VAN ZYL SMIT D. ; WOODS B. ; HORWELL R. ; HINDMARSH L. ; CHIVERS SOLICITORS, BINGLEY ; McKONE M.", "respondent": "GBR", "articles": "3;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Boulois v. Luxembourg [GC], no. 37575\/04, \u00a7 83, ECHR 2012;Choreftakis and Choreftaki v. Greece, no. 46846\/08, \u00a7 45, 17 January 2012;Dickson v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 44362\/04, \u00a7 75, ECHR 2007-V;Gillberg v. Sweden [GC], no. 41723\/06, \u00a7 53, 3 April 2012;Kafkaris v. Cyprus, [GC], no. 21906\/04, ECHR 2008-...;Maiorano and Others v. Italy, no. 28634\/06, 15 December 2009;Mastromatteo v. Italy [GC], no. 37703\/97, \u00a7 72, ECHR 2002-VIII;Pretty v. the United Kingdom, no. 2346\/02, \u00a7 65, ECHR 2002-III;Sawoniuk v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 63716\/00, ECHR 2001-VI;T. v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 24724\/94, 16 December 1999;V. v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 24888\/94, ECHR 1999-IX;V.C. v. Slovakia, no. 18968\/07, \u00a7 105, ECHR 2011 (extracts)", "external_sources": "Rule 103 of the European Prison Rules;COE Committee of Ministers Resolution 76(2);COE Committee of Ministers Recommendation 2003(23) (on the management by prison administrations of life sentence and other long-term prisoners);\nCOE Committee of Ministers Recommendation 2003(22) (on conditional release);The United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners;Article 10 \u00a7 3 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights;Article 110(4) and (5) of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court;Rules 223 and 224 of the ICC\u2019s Rules of Procedure and Evidence;The CPT\u2019s report on its visit to Switzerland from 10-20 October 2011 (25 October 2012 CPT\/Inf (2012) 26)", "conclusion": "Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading punishment;Inhuman punishment) (Substantive aspect);Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Andr\u00e1s Saj\u00f3;Ann Power-Forde;David Th\u00f3r Bj\u00f6rgvinsson;Dean Spielmann;George Nicolaou;Guido Raimondi;Ineta Ziemele;Isabelle Berro-Lef\u00e8vre;Johannes Silvis;Josep Casadevall;Lech Garlicki;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Luis L\u00f3pez Guerra;Mark Villiger;Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska;Neboj\u0161a Vu\u010dini\u0107;Nona Tsotsoria;Paul Lemmens;Paul Mahoney", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0709JUD006606909" }, "415": { "webcast_id": "6606909_28112012", "hearing_date": "2012-11-28 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Vinter and Others v. United Kingdom (no. 66069\/09, 130\/10 et 3896\/10)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "130\/10", "case_id": "001-108610", "case_name": "CASE OF VINTER AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-108610", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2012-01-17 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 3, "court": "7", "issue": "", "represented_by": "CREIGHTON S. ; WOODS B. ; Chivers Solicitors", "respondent": "GBR", "articles": "3;35", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Hussain v. the United Kingdom and Prem Singh v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1996, Reports 1996-I at paragraphs 53 and 61;Kafkaris v. Cyprus (no. 2) (dec.), no. 9644\/09, 21 June 2011;Soering v. the United Kingdom, 7 July 1989, \u00a7 104, Series A no. 161;Stafford v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 46295\/99, ECHR 2002-IV", "external_sources": "Articles 77 and 110 of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court", "conclusion": "Remainder inadmissible;No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading punishment;Inhuman punishment) (Substantive aspect)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "David Th\u00f3r Bj\u00f6rgvinsson;George Nicolaou;Lech Garlicki;Ledi Bianku;Nicolas Bratza;P\u00e4ivi Hirvel\u00e4;Vincent A. De Gaetano", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0117JUD006606909" }, "416": { "webcast_id": "6606909_28112012", "hearing_date": "2012-11-28 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Vinter and Others v. United Kingdom (no. 66069\/09, 130\/10 et 3896\/10)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "130\/10", "case_id": "001-111247", "case_name": "VINTER v. THE UNITED KINGDOM", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-111247", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "2011-02-01 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "BHATT M.", "respondent": "GBR", "articles": "3;5;5-4;7", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "", "separate_opinion": "FALSE", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "417": { "webcast_id": "6606909_28112012", "hearing_date": "2012-11-28 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Vinter and Others v. United Kingdom (no. 66069\/09, 130\/10 et 3896\/10)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "3896\/10", "case_id": "001-122664", "case_name": "CASE OF VINTER AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-122664", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2013-07-09 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "The Criminal Justice Act 2003 ; The 1998 Human Rights Act", "represented_by": "CREIGHTON S. ; WEATHERBY P. ; VAN ZYL SMIT D. ; WOODS B. ; HORWELL R. ; HINDMARSH L. ; CHIVERS SOLICITORS, BINGLEY ; McKONE M.", "respondent": "GBR", "articles": "3;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Boulois v. Luxembourg [GC], no. 37575\/04, \u00a7 83, ECHR 2012;Choreftakis and Choreftaki v. Greece, no. 46846\/08, \u00a7 45, 17 January 2012;Dickson v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 44362\/04, \u00a7 75, ECHR 2007-V;Gillberg v. Sweden [GC], no. 41723\/06, \u00a7 53, 3 April 2012;Kafkaris v. Cyprus, [GC], no. 21906\/04, ECHR 2008-...;Maiorano and Others v. Italy, no. 28634\/06, 15 December 2009;Mastromatteo v. Italy [GC], no. 37703\/97, \u00a7 72, ECHR 2002-VIII;Pretty v. the United Kingdom, no. 2346\/02, \u00a7 65, ECHR 2002-III;Sawoniuk v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 63716\/00, ECHR 2001-VI;T. v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 24724\/94, 16 December 1999;V. v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 24888\/94, ECHR 1999-IX;V.C. v. Slovakia, no. 18968\/07, \u00a7 105, ECHR 2011 (extracts)", "external_sources": "Rule 103 of the European Prison Rules;COE Committee of Ministers Resolution 76(2);COE Committee of Ministers Recommendation 2003(23) (on the management by prison administrations of life sentence and other long-term prisoners);\nCOE Committee of Ministers Recommendation 2003(22) (on conditional release);The United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners;Article 10 \u00a7 3 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights;Article 110(4) and (5) of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court;Rules 223 and 224 of the ICC\u2019s Rules of Procedure and Evidence;The CPT\u2019s report on its visit to Switzerland from 10-20 October 2011 (25 October 2012 CPT\/Inf (2012) 26)", "conclusion": "Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading punishment;Inhuman punishment) (Substantive aspect);Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Andr\u00e1s Saj\u00f3;Ann Power-Forde;David Th\u00f3r Bj\u00f6rgvinsson;Dean Spielmann;George Nicolaou;Guido Raimondi;Ineta Ziemele;Isabelle Berro-Lef\u00e8vre;Johannes Silvis;Josep Casadevall;Lech Garlicki;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Luis L\u00f3pez Guerra;Mark Villiger;Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska;Neboj\u0161a Vu\u010dini\u0107;Nona Tsotsoria;Paul Lemmens;Paul Mahoney", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0709JUD006606909" }, "418": { "webcast_id": "6606909_28112012", "hearing_date": "2012-11-28 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Vinter and Others v. United Kingdom (no. 66069\/09, 130\/10 et 3896\/10)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "3896\/10", "case_id": "001-108610", "case_name": "CASE OF VINTER AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-108610", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2012-01-17 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 3, "court": "7", "issue": "", "represented_by": "CREIGHTON S. ; WOODS B. ; Chivers Solicitors", "respondent": "GBR", "articles": "3;35", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Hussain v. the United Kingdom and Prem Singh v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1996, Reports 1996-I at paragraphs 53 and 61;Kafkaris v. Cyprus (no. 2) (dec.), no. 9644\/09, 21 June 2011;Soering v. the United Kingdom, 7 July 1989, \u00a7 104, Series A no. 161;Stafford v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 46295\/99, ECHR 2002-IV", "external_sources": "Articles 77 and 110 of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court", "conclusion": "Remainder inadmissible;No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading punishment;Inhuman punishment) (Substantive aspect)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "David Th\u00f3r Bj\u00f6rgvinsson;George Nicolaou;Lech Garlicki;Ledi Bianku;Nicolas Bratza;P\u00e4ivi Hirvel\u00e4;Vincent A. De Gaetano", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0117JUD006606909" }, "419": { "webcast_id": "6606909_28112012", "hearing_date": "2012-11-28 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Vinter and Others v. United Kingdom (no. 66069\/09, 130\/10 et 3896\/10)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "3896\/10", "case_id": "001-111247", "case_name": "VINTER v. THE UNITED KINGDOM", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-111247", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "2011-02-01 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "BHATT M.", "respondent": "GBR", "articles": "3;5;5-4;7", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "", "separate_opinion": "FALSE", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "420": { "webcast_id": "2542409_14112012", "hearing_date": "2012-11-14 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Allen v. United Kingdom (no. 25424\/09)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "25424\/09", "case_id": "001-122859", "case_name": "CASE OF ALLEN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-122859", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2013-07-12 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Sections 2(1)(a) and 2(3) of the Criminal Appeal Act 1968 ; Section 133 of the 1988 Act", "represented_by": "STEPHENSONS", "respondent": "GBR", "articles": "6;6-2;P7-3", "strasbourg_caselaw": "A.L. v. Germany, no. 72758\/01, 28 April 2005;Akay v. Turkey (dec.), no. 34501\/97, 19 February 2002;Allenet de Ribemont v. France, 10 February 1995, \u00a7\u00a7 35-36, Series A no. 308;Al-Skeini and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 55721\/07, \u00a7 162, ECHR 2011;Ashendon and Jones v. the United Kingdom, nos. 35730\/07 and 4285\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 42 and 49, 15 December 2011;Baars v. the Netherlands, no. 44320\/98, 28 October 2003;Barber\u00e0, Messegu\u00e9 and Jabardo v. Spain, 6 December 1988, \u00a7 77, Series A no. 146;Bok v. the Netherlands, no. 45482\/06, 18 January 2011;Capeau v. Belgium, no. 42914\/98, ECHR 2005-I;Capeau v. Belgium (dec.), no. 42914\/98, 6 April 2004;\u00c7elik (Bozkurt) v. Turkey, no. 34388\/05, \u00a7 34, 12 April 2011;Constantin Florea v. Romania, no. 21534\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 50 and 52, 19 June 2012;Del Latte v. the Netherlands, no. 44760\/98, 9 November 2004;Diacenco v. Romania, no. 124\/04, 7 February 2012;Engel and Others v. the Netherlands, 8 June 1976, \u00a7 82, Series A no. 22;Englert v. Germany, 25 August 1987, \u00a7\u00a7 35-37, Series A no. 123;Erkol v. Turkey, no. 50172\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 33 and 37, 19 April 2011;Fellner v. Austria (dec.), no. 64077\/00, 10 October 2002;G.C.P. v. Romania, no. 20899\/03, \u00a7 46, 20 December 2011;Grabchuk v. Ukraine, no. 8599\/02, 21 September 2006;Hammern v. Norway, no. 30287\/96, \u00a7\u00a7 41-48, 11 February 2003;Heaney and McGuinness v. Ireland, no. 34720\/97, \u00a7 40, ECHR 2000-XII;Konstas v. Greece, no. 53466\/07, \u00a7 34, 24 May 2011;Lagard\u00e8re v. France, no. 18851\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 73 and 76, 12 April 2012;Lamanna v. Austria, no. 28923\/95, \u00a7 38, 10 July 2001;Leutscher v. the Netherlands, 26 March 1996, \u00a7 29, Reports 1996-II;Lorenzetti v. Italy, no. 32075\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 43-47, 10 April 2012;Lundkvist v. Sweden (dec.), no. 48518\/99, ECHR 2003-XI;Lutz v. Germany, 25 August 1987, Series A no. 123;Maaouia v. France [GC], no. 39652\/98, \u00a7\u00a7 36-37, ECHR 2000-X;McHugo v. Switzerland (dec.), no. 55705\/00, 12 May 2005;Minelli v. Switzerland, 25 March 1983, Series A no. 62;Moullet v. France (dec.), no. 27521\/04, 13 September 2007;Mulaj and Sallahi v. Austria (dec.), no. 48886\/99, 27 June 2002;Ne\u0161t\u00e1k v. Slovakia, no. 65559\/01, \u00a7 88, 27 February 2007;N\u00f6lkenbockhoff v. Germany, 25 August 1987, Series A no. 123;O. v. Norway, no. 29327\/95, \u00a7\u00a7 33-40, ECHR 2003-II;O.L. v. Finland (dec.), no. 61110\/00, 5 July 2005;Orr v. Norway, no. 31283\/04, 15 May 2008;Panteleyenko v. Ukraine, no. 11901\/02, \u00a7 67, 29 June 2006;Phillips v. the United Kingdom, no. 41087\/98, \u00a7 31, ECHR 2001-VII;Puig Panella v. Spain, no. 1483\/02, \u00a7 50, 25 April 2006;Radio France and Others v. France, no. 53984\/00, \u00a7 24, ECHR 2004-II;Reeves v. Norway (dec.), no. 4248\/02, 8 July 2004;Ringvold v. Norway, no. 34964\/97, ECHR 2003-II;Roatis v. Austria (dec.), no. 61903\/00, 27 June 2002;Rushiti v. Austria, no. 28389\/95, \u00a7 27, 21 March 2000;Salabiaku v. France, 7 October 1988, \u00a7 28, Series A no. 141-A;Saunders v. the United Kingdom, 17 December 1996, \u00a7 68, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-VI;Sekanina v. Austria, 25 August 1993, Series A no. 266-A;\u0160ikic v. Croatia, no. 9143\/08, \u00a7 47, 15 July 2010;Soering v. the United Kingdom, 7 July 1989, \u00a7 87, Series A no. 161;Taliadorou and Stylianou v. Cyprus, nos. 39627\/05 and 39631\/05, 16 October 2008;Telfner v. Austria, no. 33501\/96, \u00a7 15, 20 March 2001;Tendam v. Spain, no. 25720\/05, 13 July 2010;Vanjak v. Croatia, no. 29889\/04, 14 January 2010;Vassilios Stavropoulos v. Greece, no. 35522\/04, 27 September 2007;Vulakh and Others v. Russia, no. 33468\/03, \u00a7 32, 10 January 2012;Weixelbraun v. Austria, no. 33730\/96, 20 December 2001;Y. v. Norway, no. 56568\/00, \u00a7 39, ECHR 2003-II;Yassar Hussain v. the United Kingdom, no. 8866\/04, ECHR 2006-III;Zollman v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 62902\/00, ECHR 2003-XII", "external_sources": "Article 14(6) of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights 1966 (ICCPR);Explanatory Report to Protocol 7", "conclusion": "No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6-2 - Presumption of innocence)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Andr\u00e1s Saj\u00f3;Dean Spielmann;George Nicolaou;Guido Raimondi;Ineta Ziemele;Isabelle Berro-Lef\u00e8vre;J\u00e1n \u0160ikuta;Josep Casadevall;Khanlar Hajiyev;Krzysztof Wojtyczek;Lech Garlicki;Ledi Bianku;Mark Villiger;Nicolas Bratza;Paul Lemmens;Paul Mahoney;Vincent A. De Gaetano;Zdravka Kalaydjieva", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0712JUD002542409" }, "421": { "webcast_id": "2542409_14112012", "hearing_date": "2012-11-14 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Allen v. United Kingdom (no. 25424\/09)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "25424\/09", "case_id": "001-112344", "case_name": "ALLEN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-112344", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "2010-12-14 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "PEMBERTON M.", "respondent": "GBR", "articles": "6;6-2", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "", "separate_opinion": "FALSE", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "422": { "webcast_id": "2785309_10102012", "hearing_date": "2012-10-10 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "X. v. Latvia (no. 27853\/09)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "27853\/09", "case_id": "001-138992", "case_name": "CASE OF X v. LATVIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-138992", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2013-11-26 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Section 644 of the Latvian Civil Procedure Act", "represented_by": "STRAUSS R.", "respondent": "LVA", "articles": "8;8-1;8-2;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Amann v. Switzerland [GC], no. 27798\/95, \u00a7 50, ECHR 2000 II;Artico v. Italy, 13 May 1980, \u00a7 33, Series A no. 37;B. v. Belgium, no. 4320\/11, \u00a7\u00a7 70-72, 10 July 2012;Demir and Baykara v. Turkey [GC), no. 34503\/97, \u00a7 67, ECHR 2008-...;Eskinazi and Chelouche v. Turkey (dec.), no. 14600\/05, ECHR 2005 XIII (extracts);Garc\u00eda Ruiz v. Spain [GC], no. 30544\/96, \u00a7 28, ECHR 1999 I;Hokkanen v. Finland, 23 September 1994, \u00a7 55, Series A no. 299-A;Iglesias Gil and A.U.I. v. Spain, no. 56673\/00, \u00a7 51, ECHR 2003 V;Ignaccolo-Zenide v. Romania, no. 31679\/96, \u00a7 95, 25 January 2000;K. and T. v. Finland [GC], no. 25702\/94, \u00a7 154, ECHR 2001 VII;Kuri\u0107 and Others v. Slovenia [GC], no. 26828\/06, \u00a7 341, ECHR 2012-...;Loizidou v. Turkey (Preliminary Objections), 23 March 1995, \u00a7 93, Series A no. 310;M. R. and L. R. v. Estonia (dec.), no. 13420\/12, \u00a7 37, 15 May 2012;Maire v. Portugal, no. 48206\/99, \u00a7 72, ECHR 2003 VII;Maslov v. Austria [GC], no. 1638\/03, \u00a7 91, ECHR 2008-...;Maumousseau and Washington v. France, no. 39388\/05, \u00a7 79, 6 December 2007;Nada v. Switzerland [GC], no. 10593\/08, 12 September 2012, ECHR 2012-...;Neulinger and Shuruk v. Switzerland, ([GC], no. 41615\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 49-55, ECHR 2010-...;Raban v. Romania, no. 25437\/08, \u00a7 28, 26 October 2010;Slivenko v. Latvia [GC], no. 48321\/99, \u00a7 100, ECHR 2003 X;\u0160neersone and Kampanella, no. 14737\/09, 12 July 2011", "external_sources": "Articles 3, 11, 13 b) and 20 of the Hague Convention of 25 October 1980 on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction;Article 24 \u00a7 2 of the European Union Charter of Fundamental Rights;Council Regulation (EC) No. 2201\/2003 of 27 November 2003 concerning jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility (known as \u201cBrussels II bis Regulation\u201d)", "conclusion": "Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Positive obligations;Article 8-1 - Respect for family life)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Alvina Gyulumyan;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Corneliu B\u00eersan;Dean Spielmann;Egbert Myjer;George Nicolaou;Guido Raimondi;Ineta Ziemele;J\u00e1n \u0160ikuta;Josep Casadevall;Julia Laffranque;Khanlar Hajiyev;Kristina Pardalos;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Luis L\u00f3pez Guerra;Mark Villiger;Neboj\u0161a Vu\u010dini\u0107;Nicolas Bratza;P\u00e4ivi Hirvel\u00e4;Paulo Pinto De Albuquerque;Zdravka Kalaydjieva", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1126JUD002785309" }, "423": { "webcast_id": "2785309_10102012", "hearing_date": "2012-10-10 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "X. v. Latvia (no. 27853\/09)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "27853\/09", "case_id": "001-107888", "case_name": "CASE OF X v. LATVIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-107888", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2011-12-13 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 3, "court": "6", "issue": "", "represented_by": "STRAUSS R.", "respondent": "LVA", "articles": "8;8-1;8-2;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Bronda v. Italy, 9 June 1998, \u00a7 52, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-IV;Eskinazi and Chelouche v. Turkey (dec.), no. 14600\/05, 6 December 2005;Garc\u00eda Ruiz v. Spain [GC], no. 30544\/96, \u00a7 28, ECHR 1999-I;Hokkanen v. Finland, 23 September 1994, \u00a7 55, Series A no. 299-A;Iosub Caras v. Romania, no. 7198\/04, \u00a7 41, 27 July 2006;Kruslin v. France, 24 April 1990, \u00a7 27, Series A no. 176-A;Maumousseau and Washington v. France, no. 39388\/05, 6 December 2007;Neulinger and Shuruk v. Switzerland [GC], no. 41615\/07, \u00a7 138, 6 July 2010;Nikolova v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 31195\/96, \u00a7 69, ECHR 1999-II;Sahin v. Germany [GC], no. 30943\/96, \u00a7 73, ECHR 2003-VIII;\u0160neersone and Kampanella v. Italy, no. 14737\/09, 12 July 2011, \u00a7 95;Sommerfeld v. Germany [GC], no. 31871\/96, \u00a7 64, ECHR 2003-VIII (extracts);The Sunday Times v. the United Kingdom (no. 1), 26 April 1979, \u00a7 49, Series A no. 30;W. v. the United Kingdom, 8 July 1987, \u00a7 64, Series A no. 121", "external_sources": "Article 3 and 13b of the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction;Australian Family Law Act 1975", "conclusion": "Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Art. 8;Non-pecuniary damage - award", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Alvina Gyulumyan;Corneliu B\u00eersan;Egbert Myjer;Ineta Ziemele;Josep Casadevall;Kristina Pardalos;Luis L\u00f3pez Guerra", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1213JUD002785309" }, "424": { "webcast_id": "1901007_03102012", "hearing_date": "2012-10-03 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "X. and Others v. Austria (no. 19010\/07)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "19010\/07", "case_id": "001-116735", "case_name": "CASE OF X AND OTHERS v. AUSTRIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-116735", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2013-02-19 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Articles 179 \u00a7 2, 180a , 181 \u00a7 1, sub-paragraph 2, 181 \u00a7 3 and 182 \u00a7 2 of the Civil Code ; Article 8 \u00a7 4 of the Registered Partnership Act", "represented_by": "GRAUPNER H.", "respondent": "AUT", "articles": "8;8-1;14;14+8;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "A, B and C v. Ireland [GC], no. 25579\/05, \u00a7 232, ECHR 2010;Al-Saadoon and Mufdhi v. the United Kingdom, no. 61498\/08, \u00a7 128, ECHR 2010 (extracts);Burden v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 13378\/05, \u00a7 60, ECHR 2008;Christine Goodwin v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 28957\/95, \u00a7 78, ECHR 2002-VI;Dudgeon v. the United Kingdom, 22 October 1981, Series A no. 45;E.B. v. France [GC], no. 43546\/02, 22 January 2008;Emonet and Others v. Switzerland, no. 39051\/03, 13 December 2007;Eski v. Austria, no. 21949\/03, 25 January 2007;Frett\u00e9 v. France, no. 36515\/97, ECHR 2002-I;Gas and Dubois v. France, no. 25951\/07, 15 March 2012;Hirst v. the United Kingdom (no. 2) [GC], no. 74025\/01, \u00a7 72, ECHR 2005-IX;Karner v. Austria, no. 40016\/98, ECHR 2003-IX;Kozak v. Poland, no. 13102\/02, 2 March 2010;L. and V. v. Austria, nos. 39392\/98 and 39829\/98, ECHR 2003-I;Modinos v. Cyprus, 22 April 1993, Series A no. 259;Norris v. Ireland, 26 October 1988, Series A no. 142;P.B. and J.S. v. Austria, no. 18984\/02, 22 July 2010;Petrovic v. Austria, 27 March 1998, \u00a7 22, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-II;S.H. and Others v. Austria [GC], no. 57813\/00, \u00a7 94, ECHR 2011;Salgueiro da Silva Mouta v. Portugal, no. 33290\/96, ECHR 1999-IX;Schalk and Kopf v. Austria, no. 30141\/04, ECHR 2010;Smith and Grady v. the United Kingdom, nos. 33985\/96 and 33986\/96, ECHR 1999-VI;Sporer v. Austria, no. 35637\/03, \u00a7\u00a7 88-90, 3 February 2011;Wagner and J.M.W.L. v. Luxembourg, no. 76240\/01, \u00a7 119, 28 June 2007;Zaunegger v. Germany, no. 22028\/04, \u00a7\u00a7 61-63, 3 December 2009", "external_sources": "Article 7 \u00a7\u00a7 1 and 2 of the 2008 European Convention on the Adoption of Children;Recommendation CM\/Rec(2010)5 adopted on 31 March 2010 by the Committee of Ministers", "conclusion": "No violation of Article 14+8 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life;Article 8-1 - Respect for family life);Violation of Article 14+8 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life;Article 8-1 - Respect for family life);Non-pecuniary damage - award", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Anatoly Kovler;Andr\u00e9 Potocki;Dean Spielmann;Egbert Myjer;Elisabeth Steiner;Erik M\u00f8se;Guido Raimondi;Ineta Ziemele;Isabelle Berro-Lef\u00e8vre;J\u00e1n \u0160ikuta;Josep Casadevall;Julia Laffranque;Khanlar Hajiyev;Lech Garlicki;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Peer Lorenzen;Vincent A. De Gaetano", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0219JUD001901007" }, "425": { "webcast_id": "1901007_03102012", "hearing_date": "2012-10-03 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "X. and Others v. Austria (no. 19010\/07)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "19010\/07", "case_id": "001-112158", "case_name": "X AND OTHERS v. AUSTRIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-112158", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "2009-01-29 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "GRAUPNER HELMUT", "respondent": "AUT", "articles": "8;8-1;14", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Communicated", "separate_opinion": "FALSE", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "426": { "webcast_id": "1232311_02102012", "hearing_date": "2012-10-02 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Michaud v. France (nos. 12323\/11)", "hearing_type": "Chamber hearing", "appno": "12323\/11", "case_id": "001-115377", "case_name": "CASE OF MICHAUD v. FRANCE", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-115377", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2012-12-06 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "23", "issue": "Decision of the National Bar Council of 12 July 2007 \u201cadopting regulations on internal procedures for implementing the obligation to combat money laundering and terrorist financing, and an internal supervisory mechanism to guarantee compliance with those procedures\u201d ; Article 21-1 of the Law of 31 December 1971 ; Law no. 2004-130 of 11 February 2004 ; Monetary and Financial Code", "represented_by": "FAVREAU B.", "respondent": "FRA", "articles": "8;8-1;8-2;34;35", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Andr\u00e9 and Other v. France, no 18603\/03, 24 July 2008;Bosphorus Hava Yollari Turizm ve Ticaret Anonim Sirketi v. Ireland [GC], no 45036\/98, ECHR 2005-VI;Burden v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 13378\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 33-34, ECHR 2008;Campbell v. the United Kingdom, 25 March 1992, \u00a7\u00a7 44 and 46-48, Series A no 233;Dudgeon v. the United Kingdom, 22 October 1981, \u00a7 41, Series A no 28;Ekinci and Akalin v. Turkey, no 77097\/01, \u00a7 47, 30 January 2007;Fr\u00e9rot v. France, no 70204\/01, \u00a7\u00a7 53-54, 12 June 2007;Grifhorst v. France, no 28336\/02, \u00a7 93, 26 February 2009;Johnston and Others v. Ireland, 18 December 1986, \u00a7 42, Series A no 112;Kokkinakis v. Greece, 25 May 1993, \u00a7 52, Series A no 260-A;Kopp v. Switzerland, 25 March 1998, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-II;M.S.S. v. Belgium and Greece [GC], no 30696\/09, ECHR 2011;Marckx v. Belgium, 13 June 1979, \u00a7 27, Series A no 31;Mor v. France, no 28198\/09, 15 December 2011;Niemietz v. Germany, 16 December 1992, Series A no 251-B;Norris v. Ireland, 26 October 1988, \u00a7\u00a7 30-34 and 38, Series A no 142;Roemen and Schmit v. Luxembourg, no 51772\/99, ECHR 2003-IV;Sallinen and Others v. Finland, no 50882\/99, 27 September 2005;Sch\u00f6nenberger and Durmaz v. Switzerland, 20 June 1988, Series A no 137;Silver and Others v. the United Kingdom, 25 March 1983, \u00a7\u00a7 56-88, Series A no 61;Wieser and Bicos Beteiligungen GmbH v. Austria, no 74336\/01, \u00a7\u00a7 65-66, ECHR 2007-IV;Xavier Da Silveira v. France, no 43757\/05, \u00a7 36-37 and 43, 21 January 2010", "external_sources": "Directive 91\/308\/EEC, 10 June 1991;Article 6 of the Treaty on European Union;Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union;Articles 169, 170, 173, 175, 177, 184 and 189 of the Treaty establishing the European Community;Recommendations 12 and 16 of the financial action task force (\u201cFATF\u201d) on money laundering;Council of Europe Convention on Laundering, Search, Seizure and Confiscation of the Proceeds from Crime and on the Financing of Terrorism (16 May 2005)", "conclusion": "Remainder inadmissible;No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for correspondence;Respect for private life)", "separate_opinion": "FALSE", "judges": "Andr\u00e9 Potocki;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Ann Power-Forde;Dean Spielmann;Helen Keller;Karel Jungwiert;Mark Villiger", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1206JUD001232311" }, "427": { "webcast_id": "5280609_18092012", "hearing_date": "2012-09-18 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Vilnes and Others v. Norway (nos. 52806\/09 & 22703\/10)", "hearing_type": "Chamber hearing", "appno": "52806\/09", "case_id": "001-138597", "case_name": "CASE OF VILNES AND OTHERS v. NORWAY", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-138597", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2013-12-05 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 2, "court": "4", "issue": "Article 121 of the 1967 Diving Regulation ; Articles 3.4 (1) and 3(k) of the 1978 Regulation Appendix", "represented_by": "LUDVIGSEN E. ; JOHNSRUD E. ; HELLUM-LILLEENGEN K. ; BENTSEN H.", "respondent": "NOR", "articles": "2;2-1;3;8;8-1;35;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Akdivar and Others v. Turkey, 16 September 1996, \u00a7 67, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 IV;Budayeva and Others v. Russia, nos. 15339\/02, 21166\/02, 20058\/02, 11673\/02 and 15343\/02, ECHR 2008 (extracts);Clift v. the United Kingdom, no. 7205\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 56-59, 13 July 2010;Guerra and Others v. Italy, 19 February 1998, \u00a7\u00a7 57-60, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 I;Kingsley v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 35605\/97, \u00a7 40, ECHR 2002 IV;Klaas v. Germany, 22 September 1993, \u00a7\u00a7 29 and 30, Series A no. 269;Kolyadenko and Others v. Russia, nos. 17423\/05, 20534\/05, 20678\/05, 23263\/05, 24283\/05 and 35673\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 157-161, 28 February 2012;L\u00f3pez Ostra v. Spain, 9 December 1994, 55, Series A no. 303 C;McGinley and Egan v. the United Kingdom, 9 June 1998, \u00a7\u00a7 98-104, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 III;Mu\u00f1oz D\u00edaz v. Spain, no. 49151\/07, ECHR 2009;Nikolova v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 31195\/96, \u00a7 73, ECHR 1999-II;\u00d6nery\u0131ld\u0131z v. Turkey [GC], no. 48939\/99, ECHR 2004 XII;Roche v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 32555\/96, \u00a7\u00a7 155-169, ECHR 2005 X;Van Oosterwijck v. Belgium, 6 November 1980, \u00a7\u00a7 36 to 40, Series A no. 40", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Remainder inadmissible;No violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2 - Positive obligations;Article 2-1 - Life) (Substantive aspect);No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman punishment;Positive obligations) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Positive obligations;Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Positive obligations;Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed;Non-pecuniary damage - award", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Dag Bugge Nord\u00e9n;Erik M\u00f8se;Julia Laffranque;Khanlar Hajiyev;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska;Peer Lorenzen", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1205JUD005280609" }, "428": { "webcast_id": "5280609_18092012", "hearing_date": "2012-09-18 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Vilnes and Others v. Norway (nos. 52806\/09 & 22703\/10)", "hearing_type": "Chamber hearing", "appno": "52806\/09", "case_id": "001-112348", "case_name": "VILNES v. NORWAY", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-112348", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "2011-06-07 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "LUDVIGSEN E.", "respondent": "NOR", "articles": "2;2-1;3;8;8-1;34", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "", "separate_opinion": "FALSE", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "429": { "webcast_id": "5280609_18092012", "hearing_date": "2012-09-18 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Vilnes and Others v. Norway (nos. 52806\/09 & 22703\/10)", "hearing_type": "Chamber hearing", "appno": "52806\/09", "case_id": "001-112835", "case_name": "MULEDAL AND OTHERS v. NORWAY", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-112835", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "2011-06-07 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "OREN K.H.", "respondent": "NOR", "articles": "2;2-1;3;8;8-1;34;35", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "", "separate_opinion": "FALSE", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "430": { "webcast_id": "5280609_18092012", "hearing_date": "2012-09-18 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Vilnes and Others v. Norway (nos. 52806\/09 & 22703\/10)", "hearing_type": "Chamber hearing", "appno": "22703\/10", "case_id": "001-138597", "case_name": "CASE OF VILNES AND OTHERS v. NORWAY", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-138597", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2013-12-05 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 2, "court": "4", "issue": "Article 121 of the 1967 Diving Regulation ; Articles 3.4 (1) and 3(k) of the 1978 Regulation Appendix", "represented_by": "LUDVIGSEN E. ; JOHNSRUD E. ; HELLUM-LILLEENGEN K. ; BENTSEN H.", "respondent": "NOR", "articles": "2;2-1;3;8;8-1;35;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Akdivar and Others v. Turkey, 16 September 1996, \u00a7 67, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 IV;Budayeva and Others v. Russia, nos. 15339\/02, 21166\/02, 20058\/02, 11673\/02 and 15343\/02, ECHR 2008 (extracts);Clift v. the United Kingdom, no. 7205\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 56-59, 13 July 2010;Guerra and Others v. Italy, 19 February 1998, \u00a7\u00a7 57-60, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 I;Kingsley v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 35605\/97, \u00a7 40, ECHR 2002 IV;Klaas v. Germany, 22 September 1993, \u00a7\u00a7 29 and 30, Series A no. 269;Kolyadenko and Others v. Russia, nos. 17423\/05, 20534\/05, 20678\/05, 23263\/05, 24283\/05 and 35673\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 157-161, 28 February 2012;L\u00f3pez Ostra v. Spain, 9 December 1994, 55, Series A no. 303 C;McGinley and Egan v. the United Kingdom, 9 June 1998, \u00a7\u00a7 98-104, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 III;Mu\u00f1oz D\u00edaz v. Spain, no. 49151\/07, ECHR 2009;Nikolova v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 31195\/96, \u00a7 73, ECHR 1999-II;\u00d6nery\u0131ld\u0131z v. Turkey [GC], no. 48939\/99, ECHR 2004 XII;Roche v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 32555\/96, \u00a7\u00a7 155-169, ECHR 2005 X;Van Oosterwijck v. Belgium, 6 November 1980, \u00a7\u00a7 36 to 40, Series A no. 40", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Remainder inadmissible;No violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2 - Positive obligations;Article 2-1 - Life) (Substantive aspect);No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman punishment;Positive obligations) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Positive obligations;Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Positive obligations;Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed;Non-pecuniary damage - award", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Dag Bugge Nord\u00e9n;Erik M\u00f8se;Julia Laffranque;Khanlar Hajiyev;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska;Peer Lorenzen", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1205JUD005280609" }, "431": { "webcast_id": "5280609_18092012", "hearing_date": "2012-09-18 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Vilnes and Others v. Norway (nos. 52806\/09 & 22703\/10)", "hearing_type": "Chamber hearing", "appno": "22703\/10", "case_id": "001-112348", "case_name": "VILNES v. NORWAY", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-112348", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "2011-06-07 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "LUDVIGSEN E.", "respondent": "NOR", "articles": "2;2-1;3;8;8-1;34", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "", "separate_opinion": "FALSE", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "432": { "webcast_id": "5280609_18092012", "hearing_date": "2012-09-18 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Vilnes and Others v. Norway (nos. 52806\/09 & 22703\/10)", "hearing_type": "Chamber hearing", "appno": "22703\/10", "case_id": "001-112835", "case_name": "MULEDAL AND OTHERS v. NORWAY", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-112835", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "2011-06-07 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "OREN K.H.", "respondent": "NOR", "articles": "2;2-1;3;8;8-1;34;35", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "", "separate_opinion": "FALSE", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "433": { "webcast_id": "5167110_04092012", "hearing_date": "2012-09-04 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Ladele v. United Kingdom (no. 51671\/10), McFarlane v. United Kingdom (no. 36516\/10), Eweida v. United Kingdom (no. 48420\/10) & Chaplin v. United Kingdom (no. 59842\/10)", "hearing_type": "Chamber hearing", "appno": "51671\/10", "case_id": "001-115881", "case_name": "CASE OF EWEIDA AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-115881", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2013-01-15 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "7", "issue": "Regulation 3 of the 2003 Regulations", "represented_by": "AUGHTON AINSWORTH ; P. DIAMOND ; ORMERODS", "respondent": "GBR", "articles": "9;9-1;9-2;14;14+9;35;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Arrowsmith v. the United Kingdom, Commission\u2019s report of 12 October 1978, Decisions and Reports 19, p. 5;Bayatyan v. Armenia [GC], no. 23459\/03, ECHR 2011;Burden v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 13378\/05, \u00a7 60, ECHR 2008;C. v. the United Kingdom, Commission decision of 15 December 1983, DR 37, p. 142;Carson and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 42184\/05, \u00a7 61, ECHR 2010;Cha\u2019are Shalom Ve Tsedek v. France [GC], no. 27417\/95, \u00a7\u00a7 73-74, ECHR 2000-VII;D. v. Ireland (dec.), no. 26499\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 89 and 91, 28 June 2006;D.H. and Others v. the Czech Republic [GC], no. 57325\/00, \u00a7 175, ECHR 2007;Evans v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 6339\/05, \u00a7 77, ECHR 2007-I;Fox v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 61319\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 41-42, 20 March 2012;Hasan and Chaush v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 30985\/96, \u00a7 78, ECHR 2000-XI;Jak\u00f3bski v. Poland, no. 18429\/06, \u00a7 44, 7 December 2010;Karner v. Austria, no. 40016\/98, \u00a7 37, ECHR 2003-IX;Kokkinakis v. Greece, 25 May 1993, \u00a7 31, Series A no. 260-A;Konttinen v. Finland, Commission\u2019s decision of 3 December 1996, Decisions and Reports 87-A, p. 68;Kosteski v. \u201cthe former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia\u201d, no. 55170\/00, \u00a7 39, 13 April 2006;Leela F\u00f6rderkreis e.V. and Others v. Germany, no. 58911\/00, \u00a7 80, 6 November 2008;Leyla Sahin v. Turkey [GC], no. 44774\/98, ECHR 2005-XI;Manoussakis and Others v. Greece, judgment of 26 September 1996, Reports 1996-IV, p. 1365, \u00a7 47;Otto-Preminger-Institut v. Austria, judgment of 25 November 1994, Series A no. 295, \u00a7 47;Palomo S\u00e1nchez and Others v. Spain [GC], nos. 28955\/06, 28957\/06, 28959\/06 and 28964\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 58-61, ECHR 2011;Pichon and Sajous v. France (dec.), no. 49853\/99, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 2001-X;Refah Partisi (the Welfare Party) and Others v. Turkey [GC], nos. 41340\/98, 41342\/98, 41343\/98 and 41344\/98, \u00a7 1, ECHR 2003-II;Runkee and White v. the United Kingdom, nos. 42949\/98 and 53134\/99, \u00a7 35, 10 May 2007;Schalk and Kopf v. Austria, no. 30141\/04, ECHR 2010;Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803\/94, \u00a7 74, ECHR 1999 V;Skugar and Others v. Russia (dec.), no. 40010\/04, 3 December 2009;Smith and Grady v. the United Kingdom, nos. 33985\/96 and 33986\/96, ECHR 1999-VI;Stedman v. the United Kingdom, Commission\u2019s decision of 9 April 1997;Thlimmenos v. Greece [GC], no. 34369\/97, ECHR 2000-IV;Vogt v. Germany, 26 September 1995, \u00a7 44, Series A no. 323;Young, James and Webster v. the United Kingdom, 13 August 1981, \u00a7\u00a7 54-55, Series A no. 44;Zaoui v. Switzerland (dec.), no. 41615\/98, 18 January 2001", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 9 - Freedom of thought conscience and religion (Article 9-1 - Manifest religion or belief);No violation of Article 9 - Freedom of thought conscience and religion (Article 9-1 - Manifest religion or belief);No violation of Article 14+9 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article 9 - Freedom of thought conscience and religion;Article 9-1 - Manifest religion or belief);No violation of Article 9 - Freedom of thought conscience and religion (Article 9-1 - Manifest religion or belief);No violation of Article 14+9 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article 9 - Freedom of thought conscience and religion;Article 9-1 - Manifest religion or belief);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed;Non-pecuniary damage - award", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "David Th\u00f3r Bj\u00f6rgvinsson;Lech Garlicki;Neboj\u0161a Vu\u010dini\u0107;Nicolas Bratza;P\u00e4ivi Hirvel\u00e4;Vincent A. De Gaetano;Zdravka Kalaydjieva", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0115JUD004842010" }, "434": { "webcast_id": "5167110_04092012", "hearing_date": "2012-09-04 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Ladele v. United Kingdom (no. 51671\/10), McFarlane v. United Kingdom (no. 36516\/10), Eweida v. United Kingdom (no. 48420\/10) & Chaplin v. United Kingdom (no. 59842\/10)", "hearing_type": "Chamber hearing", "appno": "51671\/10", "case_id": "001-111187", "case_name": "LADELE AND McFARLANE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-111187", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "2011-04-12 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "ORMERODS SOLICITORS", "respondent": "GBR", "articles": "9;9-1;14;14+9", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Communicated", "separate_opinion": "FALSE", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "435": { "webcast_id": "5167110_04092012", "hearing_date": "2012-09-04 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Ladele v. United Kingdom (no. 51671\/10), McFarlane v. United Kingdom (no. 36516\/10), Eweida v. United Kingdom (no. 48420\/10) & Chaplin v. United Kingdom (no. 59842\/10)", "hearing_type": "Chamber hearing", "appno": "36516\/10", "case_id": "001-115881", "case_name": "CASE OF EWEIDA AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-115881", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2013-01-15 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "7", "issue": "Regulation 3 of the 2003 Regulations", "represented_by": "AUGHTON AINSWORTH ; P. DIAMOND ; ORMERODS", "respondent": "GBR", "articles": "9;9-1;9-2;14;14+9;35;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Arrowsmith v. the United Kingdom, Commission\u2019s report of 12 October 1978, Decisions and Reports 19, p. 5;Bayatyan v. Armenia [GC], no. 23459\/03, ECHR 2011;Burden v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 13378\/05, \u00a7 60, ECHR 2008;C. v. the United Kingdom, Commission decision of 15 December 1983, DR 37, p. 142;Carson and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 42184\/05, \u00a7 61, ECHR 2010;Cha\u2019are Shalom Ve Tsedek v. France [GC], no. 27417\/95, \u00a7\u00a7 73-74, ECHR 2000-VII;D. v. Ireland (dec.), no. 26499\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 89 and 91, 28 June 2006;D.H. and Others v. the Czech Republic [GC], no. 57325\/00, \u00a7 175, ECHR 2007;Evans v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 6339\/05, \u00a7 77, ECHR 2007-I;Fox v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 61319\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 41-42, 20 March 2012;Hasan and Chaush v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 30985\/96, \u00a7 78, ECHR 2000-XI;Jak\u00f3bski v. Poland, no. 18429\/06, \u00a7 44, 7 December 2010;Karner v. Austria, no. 40016\/98, \u00a7 37, ECHR 2003-IX;Kokkinakis v. Greece, 25 May 1993, \u00a7 31, Series A no. 260-A;Konttinen v. Finland, Commission\u2019s decision of 3 December 1996, Decisions and Reports 87-A, p. 68;Kosteski v. \u201cthe former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia\u201d, no. 55170\/00, \u00a7 39, 13 April 2006;Leela F\u00f6rderkreis e.V. and Others v. Germany, no. 58911\/00, \u00a7 80, 6 November 2008;Leyla Sahin v. Turkey [GC], no. 44774\/98, ECHR 2005-XI;Manoussakis and Others v. Greece, judgment of 26 September 1996, Reports 1996-IV, p. 1365, \u00a7 47;Otto-Preminger-Institut v. Austria, judgment of 25 November 1994, Series A no. 295, \u00a7 47;Palomo S\u00e1nchez and Others v. Spain [GC], nos. 28955\/06, 28957\/06, 28959\/06 and 28964\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 58-61, ECHR 2011;Pichon and Sajous v. France (dec.), no. 49853\/99, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 2001-X;Refah Partisi (the Welfare Party) and Others v. Turkey [GC], nos. 41340\/98, 41342\/98, 41343\/98 and 41344\/98, \u00a7 1, ECHR 2003-II;Runkee and White v. the United Kingdom, nos. 42949\/98 and 53134\/99, \u00a7 35, 10 May 2007;Schalk and Kopf v. Austria, no. 30141\/04, ECHR 2010;Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803\/94, \u00a7 74, ECHR 1999 V;Skugar and Others v. Russia (dec.), no. 40010\/04, 3 December 2009;Smith and Grady v. the United Kingdom, nos. 33985\/96 and 33986\/96, ECHR 1999-VI;Stedman v. the United Kingdom, Commission\u2019s decision of 9 April 1997;Thlimmenos v. Greece [GC], no. 34369\/97, ECHR 2000-IV;Vogt v. Germany, 26 September 1995, \u00a7 44, Series A no. 323;Young, James and Webster v. the United Kingdom, 13 August 1981, \u00a7\u00a7 54-55, Series A no. 44;Zaoui v. Switzerland (dec.), no. 41615\/98, 18 January 2001", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 9 - Freedom of thought conscience and religion (Article 9-1 - Manifest religion or belief);No violation of Article 9 - Freedom of thought conscience and religion (Article 9-1 - Manifest religion or belief);No violation of Article 14+9 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article 9 - Freedom of thought conscience and religion;Article 9-1 - Manifest religion or belief);No violation of Article 9 - Freedom of thought conscience and religion (Article 9-1 - Manifest religion or belief);No violation of Article 14+9 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article 9 - Freedom of thought conscience and religion;Article 9-1 - Manifest religion or belief);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed;Non-pecuniary damage - award", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "David Th\u00f3r Bj\u00f6rgvinsson;Lech Garlicki;Neboj\u0161a Vu\u010dini\u0107;Nicolas Bratza;P\u00e4ivi Hirvel\u00e4;Vincent A. De Gaetano;Zdravka Kalaydjieva", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0115JUD004842010" }, "436": { "webcast_id": "5167110_04092012", "hearing_date": "2012-09-04 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Ladele v. United Kingdom (no. 51671\/10), McFarlane v. United Kingdom (no. 36516\/10), Eweida v. United Kingdom (no. 48420\/10) & Chaplin v. United Kingdom (no. 59842\/10)", "hearing_type": "Chamber hearing", "appno": "36516\/10", "case_id": "001-111187", "case_name": "LADELE AND McFARLANE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-111187", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "2011-04-12 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "ORMERODS SOLICITORS", "respondent": "GBR", "articles": "9;9-1;14;14+9", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Communicated", "separate_opinion": "FALSE", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "437": { "webcast_id": "5167110_04092012", "hearing_date": "2012-09-04 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Ladele v. United Kingdom (no. 51671\/10), McFarlane v. United Kingdom (no. 36516\/10), Eweida v. United Kingdom (no. 48420\/10) & Chaplin v. United Kingdom (no. 59842\/10)", "hearing_type": "Chamber hearing", "appno": "48420\/10", "case_id": "001-115881", "case_name": "CASE OF EWEIDA AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-115881", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2013-01-15 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "7", "issue": "Regulation 3 of the 2003 Regulations", "represented_by": "AUGHTON AINSWORTH ; P. DIAMOND ; ORMERODS", "respondent": "GBR", "articles": "9;9-1;9-2;14;14+9;35;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Arrowsmith v. the United Kingdom, Commission\u2019s report of 12 October 1978, Decisions and Reports 19, p. 5;Bayatyan v. Armenia [GC], no. 23459\/03, ECHR 2011;Burden v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 13378\/05, \u00a7 60, ECHR 2008;C. v. the United Kingdom, Commission decision of 15 December 1983, DR 37, p. 142;Carson and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 42184\/05, \u00a7 61, ECHR 2010;Cha\u2019are Shalom Ve Tsedek v. France [GC], no. 27417\/95, \u00a7\u00a7 73-74, ECHR 2000-VII;D. v. Ireland (dec.), no. 26499\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 89 and 91, 28 June 2006;D.H. and Others v. the Czech Republic [GC], no. 57325\/00, \u00a7 175, ECHR 2007;Evans v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 6339\/05, \u00a7 77, ECHR 2007-I;Fox v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 61319\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 41-42, 20 March 2012;Hasan and Chaush v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 30985\/96, \u00a7 78, ECHR 2000-XI;Jak\u00f3bski v. Poland, no. 18429\/06, \u00a7 44, 7 December 2010;Karner v. Austria, no. 40016\/98, \u00a7 37, ECHR 2003-IX;Kokkinakis v. Greece, 25 May 1993, \u00a7 31, Series A no. 260-A;Konttinen v. Finland, Commission\u2019s decision of 3 December 1996, Decisions and Reports 87-A, p. 68;Kosteski v. \u201cthe former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia\u201d, no. 55170\/00, \u00a7 39, 13 April 2006;Leela F\u00f6rderkreis e.V. and Others v. Germany, no. 58911\/00, \u00a7 80, 6 November 2008;Leyla Sahin v. Turkey [GC], no. 44774\/98, ECHR 2005-XI;Manoussakis and Others v. Greece, judgment of 26 September 1996, Reports 1996-IV, p. 1365, \u00a7 47;Otto-Preminger-Institut v. Austria, judgment of 25 November 1994, Series A no. 295, \u00a7 47;Palomo S\u00e1nchez and Others v. Spain [GC], nos. 28955\/06, 28957\/06, 28959\/06 and 28964\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 58-61, ECHR 2011;Pichon and Sajous v. France (dec.), no. 49853\/99, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 2001-X;Refah Partisi (the Welfare Party) and Others v. Turkey [GC], nos. 41340\/98, 41342\/98, 41343\/98 and 41344\/98, \u00a7 1, ECHR 2003-II;Runkee and White v. the United Kingdom, nos. 42949\/98 and 53134\/99, \u00a7 35, 10 May 2007;Schalk and Kopf v. Austria, no. 30141\/04, ECHR 2010;Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803\/94, \u00a7 74, ECHR 1999 V;Skugar and Others v. Russia (dec.), no. 40010\/04, 3 December 2009;Smith and Grady v. the United Kingdom, nos. 33985\/96 and 33986\/96, ECHR 1999-VI;Stedman v. the United Kingdom, Commission\u2019s decision of 9 April 1997;Thlimmenos v. Greece [GC], no. 34369\/97, ECHR 2000-IV;Vogt v. Germany, 26 September 1995, \u00a7 44, Series A no. 323;Young, James and Webster v. the United Kingdom, 13 August 1981, \u00a7\u00a7 54-55, Series A no. 44;Zaoui v. Switzerland (dec.), no. 41615\/98, 18 January 2001", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 9 - Freedom of thought conscience and religion (Article 9-1 - Manifest religion or belief);No violation of Article 9 - Freedom of thought conscience and religion (Article 9-1 - Manifest religion or belief);No violation of Article 14+9 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article 9 - Freedom of thought conscience and religion;Article 9-1 - Manifest religion or belief);No violation of Article 9 - Freedom of thought conscience and religion (Article 9-1 - Manifest religion or belief);No violation of Article 14+9 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article 9 - Freedom of thought conscience and religion;Article 9-1 - Manifest religion or belief);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed;Non-pecuniary damage - award", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "David Th\u00f3r Bj\u00f6rgvinsson;Lech Garlicki;Neboj\u0161a Vu\u010dini\u0107;Nicolas Bratza;P\u00e4ivi Hirvel\u00e4;Vincent A. De Gaetano;Zdravka Kalaydjieva", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0115JUD004842010" }, "438": { "webcast_id": "5167110_04092012", "hearing_date": "2012-09-04 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Ladele v. United Kingdom (no. 51671\/10), McFarlane v. United Kingdom (no. 36516\/10), Eweida v. United Kingdom (no. 48420\/10) & Chaplin v. United Kingdom (no. 59842\/10)", "hearing_type": "Chamber hearing", "appno": "48420\/10", "case_id": "001-112944", "case_name": "EWEIDA AND CHAPLIN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-112944", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "2011-04-12 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "AUGHTON A.", "respondent": "GBR", "articles": "9;14;14+9", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "", "separate_opinion": "FALSE", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "439": { "webcast_id": "5167110_04092012", "hearing_date": "2012-09-04 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Ladele v. United Kingdom (no. 51671\/10), McFarlane v. United Kingdom (no. 36516\/10), Eweida v. United Kingdom (no. 48420\/10) & Chaplin v. United Kingdom (no. 59842\/10)", "hearing_type": "Chamber hearing", "appno": "59842\/10", "case_id": "001-115881", "case_name": "CASE OF EWEIDA AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-115881", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2013-01-15 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "7", "issue": "Regulation 3 of the 2003 Regulations", "represented_by": "AUGHTON AINSWORTH ; P. DIAMOND ; ORMERODS", "respondent": "GBR", "articles": "9;9-1;9-2;14;14+9;35;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Arrowsmith v. the United Kingdom, Commission\u2019s report of 12 October 1978, Decisions and Reports 19, p. 5;Bayatyan v. Armenia [GC], no. 23459\/03, ECHR 2011;Burden v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 13378\/05, \u00a7 60, ECHR 2008;C. v. the United Kingdom, Commission decision of 15 December 1983, DR 37, p. 142;Carson and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 42184\/05, \u00a7 61, ECHR 2010;Cha\u2019are Shalom Ve Tsedek v. France [GC], no. 27417\/95, \u00a7\u00a7 73-74, ECHR 2000-VII;D. v. Ireland (dec.), no. 26499\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 89 and 91, 28 June 2006;D.H. and Others v. the Czech Republic [GC], no. 57325\/00, \u00a7 175, ECHR 2007;Evans v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 6339\/05, \u00a7 77, ECHR 2007-I;Fox v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 61319\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 41-42, 20 March 2012;Hasan and Chaush v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 30985\/96, \u00a7 78, ECHR 2000-XI;Jak\u00f3bski v. Poland, no. 18429\/06, \u00a7 44, 7 December 2010;Karner v. Austria, no. 40016\/98, \u00a7 37, ECHR 2003-IX;Kokkinakis v. Greece, 25 May 1993, \u00a7 31, Series A no. 260-A;Konttinen v. Finland, Commission\u2019s decision of 3 December 1996, Decisions and Reports 87-A, p. 68;Kosteski v. \u201cthe former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia\u201d, no. 55170\/00, \u00a7 39, 13 April 2006;Leela F\u00f6rderkreis e.V. and Others v. Germany, no. 58911\/00, \u00a7 80, 6 November 2008;Leyla Sahin v. Turkey [GC], no. 44774\/98, ECHR 2005-XI;Manoussakis and Others v. Greece, judgment of 26 September 1996, Reports 1996-IV, p. 1365, \u00a7 47;Otto-Preminger-Institut v. Austria, judgment of 25 November 1994, Series A no. 295, \u00a7 47;Palomo S\u00e1nchez and Others v. Spain [GC], nos. 28955\/06, 28957\/06, 28959\/06 and 28964\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 58-61, ECHR 2011;Pichon and Sajous v. France (dec.), no. 49853\/99, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 2001-X;Refah Partisi (the Welfare Party) and Others v. Turkey [GC], nos. 41340\/98, 41342\/98, 41343\/98 and 41344\/98, \u00a7 1, ECHR 2003-II;Runkee and White v. the United Kingdom, nos. 42949\/98 and 53134\/99, \u00a7 35, 10 May 2007;Schalk and Kopf v. Austria, no. 30141\/04, ECHR 2010;Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803\/94, \u00a7 74, ECHR 1999 V;Skugar and Others v. Russia (dec.), no. 40010\/04, 3 December 2009;Smith and Grady v. the United Kingdom, nos. 33985\/96 and 33986\/96, ECHR 1999-VI;Stedman v. the United Kingdom, Commission\u2019s decision of 9 April 1997;Thlimmenos v. Greece [GC], no. 34369\/97, ECHR 2000-IV;Vogt v. Germany, 26 September 1995, \u00a7 44, Series A no. 323;Young, James and Webster v. the United Kingdom, 13 August 1981, \u00a7\u00a7 54-55, Series A no. 44;Zaoui v. Switzerland (dec.), no. 41615\/98, 18 January 2001", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 9 - Freedom of thought conscience and religion (Article 9-1 - Manifest religion or belief);No violation of Article 9 - Freedom of thought conscience and religion (Article 9-1 - Manifest religion or belief);No violation of Article 14+9 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article 9 - Freedom of thought conscience and religion;Article 9-1 - Manifest religion or belief);No violation of Article 9 - Freedom of thought conscience and religion (Article 9-1 - Manifest religion or belief);No violation of Article 14+9 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article 9 - Freedom of thought conscience and religion;Article 9-1 - Manifest religion or belief);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed;Non-pecuniary damage - award", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "David Th\u00f3r Bj\u00f6rgvinsson;Lech Garlicki;Neboj\u0161a Vu\u010dini\u0107;Nicolas Bratza;P\u00e4ivi Hirvel\u00e4;Vincent A. De Gaetano;Zdravka Kalaydjieva", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0115JUD004842010" }, "440": { "webcast_id": "5167110_04092012", "hearing_date": "2012-09-04 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Ladele v. United Kingdom (no. 51671\/10), McFarlane v. United Kingdom (no. 36516\/10), Eweida v. United Kingdom (no. 48420\/10) & Chaplin v. United Kingdom (no. 59842\/10)", "hearing_type": "Chamber hearing", "appno": "59842\/10", "case_id": "001-112944", "case_name": "EWEIDA AND CHAPLIN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-112944", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "2011-04-12 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "AUGHTON A.", "respondent": "GBR", "articles": "9;14;14+9", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "", "separate_opinion": "FALSE", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "441": { "webcast_id": "4987211_28082012", "hearing_date": "2012-08-28 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Tymoshenko v. Ukraine (no. 49872\/11)", "hearing_type": "Chamber hearing", "appno": "49872\/11", "case_id": "001-119382", "case_name": "CASE OF TYMOSHENKO v. UKRAINE", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-119382", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2013-04-30 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 3, "court": "23", "issue": "Act \u201cOn the procedure for compensation for damage caused to citizens by the unlawful acts of bodies of enquiry, pre-trial investigation authorities, prosecutor\u2019s offices and courts\u201d", "represented_by": "TELICHENKO V. ; VLASENKO S.", "respondent": "UKR", "articles": "3;5;5-1;5-1-c;5-4;5-5;18;18+5-1-c;35", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Aksoy v. Turkey, 18 December 1996, \u00a7 76, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-VI;Aleksanyan v. Russia, no. 46468\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 139-140, 22 December 2008;Assenov and Others v. Bulgaria, 28 October 1998, Reports 1998-VIII;Belchev v. Bulgaria, no. 39270\/98, \u00a7 82, 8 April 2004;Bozano v. France, 18 December 1986, \u00a7 60, Series A no. 111;Butkevicius v. Lithuania, no. 48297\/99, \u00a7 43, ECHR 2002-II;\u00c7agdas Sahin v. Turkey, no. 28137\/02, \u00a7 34, 11 April 2006;Castravet v. Moldova, no. 23393\/05, \u00a7 33, 13 March 2007;Cebotari v. Moldova, no. 35615\/16, \u00a7\u00a7 46 et seq., 13 November 2007;Doronin v. Ukraine, no. 16505\/02, \u00a7 59, 19 February 2009;Dzwonkowski v. Poland, no. 46702\/99, \u00a7 51, 12 April 2007;Goginashvili v. Georgia, no. 47729\/08, \u00a7 79, 4 October 2011;G\u00fcl v. Turkey, no. 22676\/93, \u00a7 89, 14 December 2000;Gusinskiy v. Russia, no. 70726\/01, 19 May 2004;Holomiov v. Moldova, no. 30649\/05, \u00a7 117, 7 November 2006;Hummatov v. Azerbaijan, nos. 9852\/03 and 13413\/04, 29 November 2007;Iglin v. Ukraine, no. 39908\/05, \u00a7 52, 12 January 2012;Ignatenco v. Moldova, no. 36988\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 77-78, 8 February 2011;Ireland v. the United Kingdom, 18 January 1978, Series A no. 25;Kaverzin v. Ukraine, no. 23893\/03, 15 May 2012;Kharchenko v. Ukraine, no. 40107\/02, 10 February 2011;Khayredinov v. Ukraine, no. 38717\/04, \u00a7\u00a7 27-28, 14 October 2010;Khodorkovskiy v. Russia, no. 5829\/04, 31 May 2011;Khudobin v. Russia, no. 59696\/00, \u00a7 83, ECHR 2006-XII (extracts);Khudoyorov v. Russia, no. 6847\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 104 et seq., ECHR 2005-X;Knyazev v. Russia, no. 25948\/05, \u00a7 103, 8 November 2007;Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210\/96, ECHR 2000-XI;Labita v. Italy [GC], no 26772\/95 ECHR 2000-IV;Labzov v. Russia, no. 62208\/00, \u00a7\u00a7 44 et seq., 16 June 2005;Lutsenko v. Ukraine, no. 6492\/11, 3 July 2012;Mahmut Kaya v. Turkey, no. 22535\/93, \u00a7 124, ECHR 2000-III;Mathew v. the Netherlands, no. 24919\/03, 29 September 2005;Medvedyev and Others v. France [GC], no. 3394\/03, \u00a7 80, ECHR 2010;Melnik v. Ukraine, no. 72286\/01, 28 March 2006;Molodorych v. Ukraine, no. 2161\/02, 28 October 2010;Mouisel v. France, no. 67263\/01, \u00a7 40, ECHR 2002-IX;Nechiporuk and Yonkalo v. Ukraine, no. 42310\/04, \u00a7 233, 21 April 2011;Ne\u0161t\u00e1k v. Slovakia, no. 65559\/01, \u00a7 74, 27 February 2007;Novoselov v. Russia, no. 66460\/01, \u00a7\u00a7 41 et seq., 2 June 2005;Ostrovar v. Moldova, no. 35207\/03, \u00a7 80, 13 September 2005;Paul and Audrey Edwards v. the United Kingdom, no. 46477\/99, \u00a7 71, ECHR 2002-II;Peers v. Greece, no. 28524\/95, \u00a7\u00a7 69 et seq., ECHR 2001-III;Piryanik v. Ukraine, no. 75788\/01, \u00a7 20, 19 April 2005;Popov v. Russia, no. 26853\/04, \u00a7 211, 13 July 2006;Ribitsch v. Austria, 4 December 1995, Series A no. 336;Sarban v. Moldova, no. 3456\/05, 4 October 2005;Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803\/94, \u00a7 95, ECHR 1999-V;Sheydayev v. Russia, no. 65859\/01, \u00a7 59, 7 December 2006;Sisojeva and Others v. Latvia [GC], no. 60654\/00, \u00a7 129, ECHR 2007-II;Solovey and Zozulya v. Ukraine, nos. 40774\/02 and 4048\/03, 27 November 2008;Stanev v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 36760\/06, \u00a7 182, 17 January 2012;Svetoslav Dimitrov v. Bulgaria, no. 55861\/00, \u00a7 76, 7 February 2008;Tanrikulu v. Turkey [GC], no. 23763\/94, \u00a7\u00a7 104 et seq., ECHR 1999-IV;Tarariyeva v. Russia, no. 4353\/03, \u00a7 73, ECHR 2006-XV (extracts);Visloguzov v. Ukraine, no. 32362\/02, \u00a7 46, 20 May 2010;Yeloyev v. Ukraine, no. 17283\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 52-55, 6 November 2008", "external_sources": "Report to the Ukrainian Government on the visit to Ukraine carried out by the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) from 29 November to 6 December 2011 [CPT\/Inf (2012) 30]", "conclusion": "Remainder inadmissible;No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention;Article 5-1-c - Bringing before competent legal authority;Reasonably necessary to prevent fleeing);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Procedural guarantees of review;Review of lawfulness of detention);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-5 - Compensation);Violation of Article 18+5-1-c - Limitation on use of restrictions on rights (Article 18 - Restrictions for unauthorised purposes) (Article 5 - Right to liberty and security;Article 5-1-c - Bringing before competent legal authority)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Andr\u00e9 Potocki;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Ann Power-Forde;Dean Spielmann;Ganna Yudkivska;Karel Jungwiert;Mark Villiger", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0430JUD004987211" }, "442": { "webcast_id": "4987211_28082012", "hearing_date": "2012-08-28 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Tymoshenko v. Ukraine (no. 49872\/11)", "hearing_type": "Chamber hearing", "appno": "49872\/11", "case_id": "001-111795", "case_name": "TYMOSHENKO v. UKRAINE", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-111795", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "2012-05-31 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "VLASENKO S.", "respondent": "UKR", "articles": "2;2-1;3;5;5-1-b;5-3;5-4;6;6-1;6-3-b;6-3-c;6-3-d", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "", "separate_opinion": "FALSE", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "443": { "webcast_id": "4987211_28082012", "hearing_date": "2012-08-28 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Tymoshenko v. Ukraine (no. 49872\/11)", "hearing_type": "Chamber hearing", "appno": "49872\/11", "case_id": "001-109460", "case_name": "TYMOSHENKO v. UKRAINE", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-109460", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "2012-03-15 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "TELYCHENKO V. ; VLASENKO S.", "respondent": "UKR", "articles": "2;2-1;3;5;5-1-b;5-3;5-4;6;6-1;6-3-b;6-3-c;6-3-d", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "", "separate_opinion": "", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "444": { "webcast_id": "3931506_19062012", "hearing_date": "2012-06-19 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Telegraaf Media Nederland Landelijke Media B.V. and Others v. the Netherlands (no. 39315\/06)", "hearing_type": "Chamber hearing", "appno": "39315\/06", "case_id": "001-114439", "case_name": "CASE OF TELEGRAAF MEDIA NEDERLAND LANDELIJKE MEDIA B.V. AND OTHERS v. THE NETHERLANDS", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-114439", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2012-11-22 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 3, "court": "6", "issue": "Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe\u2019s Recommendation No. R(2000) 7 on the right of journalists not to disclose their sources of information", "represented_by": "LE POLE R.S. ; DE KEMP M.A.", "respondent": "NLD", "articles": "8;8-1;8-2;10;10-1;10-2;35", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Barthold v. Germany, 25 March 1985, \u00a7 58, Series A no. 90;Bladet Troms\u00f8 and Stensaas v. Norway [GC], no. 21980\/93, \u00a7 65, ECHR 1999-III;Cumpana and Mazare v. Romania [GC], no. 33348\/96, ECHR 2004-XI;Ernst and Others v. Belgium, no. 33400\/96, \u00a7 100, 15 July 2003;Financial Times Ltd. and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 821\/03, 15 December 2009;Fressoz and Roire v. France [GC], no. 29183\/95, \u00a7 54, ECHR 1999-I;Goodwin v. the United Kingdom, 27 March 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 II;Guja v. Moldova [GC], no. 14277\/04, \u00a7 69, ECHR 2008;Hertel v. Switzerland, 25 August 1998, \u00a7 46, Reports 1998-VI;Kennedy v. the United Kingdom, no. 26839\/05, 18 May 2010);Klass and Others v. Germany, 6 September 1978, Series A no. 28;Liberty and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 58243\/00, \u00a7\u00a7 62-63, 1 July 2008;Lindon, Otchakovsky-Laurens and July v. France [GC], nos. 21279\/02 and 36448\/02, \u00a7 45, ECHR 2007-IV;Lingens v. Austria, 8 July 1986, \u00a7 44, Series A no. 103;Mam\u00e8re v. France, no. 12697\/03, \u00a7 19, ECHR 2006-XIII;Observer and Guardian v. the United Kingdom, 26 November 1991, \u00a7 68, Series A no. 216;Pedersen and Baadsgaard v. Denmark [GC], no. 49017\/99, \u00a7\u00a7 68-71, ECHR 2004-XI;Roemen and Schmit v. Luxembourg, no. 51772\/99, \u00a7 52, ECHR 2003-IV;S.T.S. v. the Netherlands, no. 277\/05, \u00a7 73, ECHR 2011;Sanoma Uitgevers B.V. v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 38224\/03, 14 September 2010;Segerstedt-Wiberg and Others v. Sweden, no. 62332\/00, \u00a7 76, ECHR 2006-VII;Silver and Others v. the United Kingdom, 25 March 1983, \u00a7 85, Series A no. 61;Steel and Morris v. the United Kingdom, no. 68416\/01, \u00a7 87, ECHR 2005-II;The Sunday Times v. the United Kingdom (no. 2), 26 November 1991, \u00a7 54, Series A no. 217;The Sunday Times v. the United Kingdom (no. 1), 26 April 1979, \u00a7 48, Series A no. 30;Thorgeir Thorgeirson v. Iceland, 25 June 1992, \u00a7 63, Series A no. 239;Tillack v. Belgium, no. 20477\/05, \u00a7 64, 27 November 2007;TV Vest AS and Rogaland Pensjonistparti v. Norway, no. 21132\/05, ECHR 2008 (extracts);Vereniging Weekblad Bluf! v. the Netherlands, 9 February 1995, \u00a7 45, Series A no. 306-A;Voskuil v. the Netherlands, no. 64752\/01, 22 November 2007;Weber and Saravia v. Germany (dec.), no. 54934\/00, ECHR 2006-XI", "external_sources": "Section 6(2)(a) and 19 of the 2002 Intelligence and Security Services Act;Article 96a and 552a of the Code of Criminal Procedure", "conclusion": "Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression -{General} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression);Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression -{General} (Article 10-1 - Freedom to impart information;Freedom to receive information)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Alvina Gyulumyan;Corneliu B\u00eersan;Egbert Myjer;Ineta Ziemele;Josep Casadevall;Kristina Pardalos;Luis L\u00f3pez Guerra", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1122JUD003931506" }, "445": { "webcast_id": "3931506_19062012", "hearing_date": "2012-06-19 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Telegraaf Media Nederland Landelijke Media B.V. and Others v. the Netherlands (no. 39315\/06)", "hearing_type": "Chamber hearing", "appno": "39315\/06", "case_id": "001-99089", "case_name": "UITGEVERSMAATSCHAPPIJ DE TELEGRAAF B.V. AND OTHERS v. THE NETHERLANDS", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-99089", "type": "DECISIONS", "typedescription": 9, "document_date": "", "collection": "CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "6", "issue": "", "represented_by": "DE KEMP, M.A., lawyer, Amsterdam ; LE POOLE, R.S., lawyer, Amsterdam", "respondent": "NLD", "articles": "8;10;35", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Partly inadmissible", "separate_opinion": "", "judges": "Alvina Gyulumyan;Corneliu B\u00eersan;Egbert Myjer;Elisabet Fura;Josep Casadevall;Luis L\u00f3pez Guerra", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0518DEC003931506" }, "446": { "webcast_id": "1325507_13062012", "hearing_date": "2012-06-13 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Georgia v. Russia (I) (no. 13255\/07) Just satisfaction", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "13255\/07", "case_id": "001-145546", "case_name": "CASE OF GEORGIA v. RUSSIA (I)", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-145546", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 14, "document_date": "2014-07-03 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Circular no. 0215 of 30.09.2006 of the Main Directorate of Internal Affairs of St Petersburg and the Leningrad Region ; Circular no. 849 of 29 September 2006 of the Ministry of the Interior of the Russian Federation ; Articles 18.8, 18.10 and 18.11 of the Code of Administrative Offences", "represented_by": "MESKHORADZE L. ", "respondent": "RUS", "articles": "3;5;5-1;5-1-f;5-4;8;8-1;13;13+3;13+5-1;19;35;35-1;38;41;P1-1;P1-1-1;P1-2;P4-4;P7-1;P7-1-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Akdivar and Others v. Turkey, 16 September 1996, \u00a7 69, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 IV;Ananyev and Others v. Russia, nos. 42525\/07 and 60800\/08, 10 January 2012;Chahal v. the United Kingdom, 15 November 1996, \u00a7 127, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 V;\u010conka v. Belgium, no 51564\/99, ECHR 2002 I;Cyprus v. Turkey [GC], no 25781\/94, ECHR 2001 IV;Davydov and Others v. Ukraine, nos. 17674\/02 and 39081\/02, 1 July 2010;France, Norway, Denmark, Sweden and the Netherlands v. Turkey, nos. 9940 9944\/82, decision of the Commission of 6 December 1983, \u00a7 19, DR 35;Georgia v. Russia (I) (dec.), no 13255\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 44-46 and 50, 30 June 2009;Gusinskiy v. Russia, no 70276\/01, \u00a7 73, ECHR 2004 IV;Hirsi Jamaa and Others v. Italy [GC], no 27765\/09, ECHR 2012;Idalov v. Russia [GC], no 5826\/03, 22 May 2012;Ila\u015fcu and Others v. Moldova and Russia [GC], no 48787\/99, ECHR 2004 VII;Imakayeva v. Russia, no 7615\/02, \u00a7 111, ECHR 2006 XIII (extracts);Ireland v. the United Kingdom, 18 January 1978, Series A no 25;Janowiec and Others v. Russia [GC], nos. 55508\/07 and 29520\/09, ECHR 2013;Kalashnikov v. Russia, no 47095\/99, ECHR 2002 VI;Khudoyorov v. Russia, no 6847\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 116 and seq., ECHR 2005 X (extracts);Lutsenko v. Ukraine, no 6492\/11, \u00a7 105, 3 July 2012;M.S.S. v. Belgium and Greece [GC], no 30696\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 227 and 255, ECHR 2011;Mathew v. the Netherlands, no 24919\/03, \u00a7 156, ECHR 2005 IX;Mudayevy v. Russia, no 33105\/05, \u00a7 127, 8 April 2010;NA. v. the United Kingdom, no 25904\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 119-120, 17 July 2008;Nachova and Others v. Bulgaria [GC], nos. 43577\/98 and 43579\/98, \u00a7 147, ECHR 2005-VII;Niyazov v. Russia, no 27843\/11, \u00a7\u00a7 87 and seq., 16 October 2012;Nolan and K. v. Russia, no 2512\/04, \u00a7 56, 12 February 2009;Saadi v. Italy [GC], no 37201\/06, ECHR 2008;Shamayev and Others v. Georgia and Russia, no 36378\/02, 246 and 362, ECHR 2005 III;Solovyevy v. Russia, no 918\/02, \u00a7 123, 24 April 2012;Stanev v. Bulgaria [GC], no 36760\/06, \u00a7 168, ECHR 2012;Sufi and Elmi v. the United Kingdom, nos. 8319\/07 and 11449\/07, \u00a7 230, 28 June 2011;Sultani v. France, no 45223\/05, ECHR 2007 IV (extracts);Tymoshenko v. Ukraine, no 49872\/11, \u00a7 294, 30 April 2013", "external_sources": "Report of the Monitoring Committee of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe \u2013 PACE Report;Information note of 1 November 2006 of the Federal Migration Service of the Russian Federation - HRW Report;Report of the International Federation for Human Rights - FIDH Report;Report of the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture (CPT) on the Russian Federation of December 2001;Report to the Russian Government on the CPT\u2019s visit to the Russian Federation from 2 to 7 December 2001, \u00a7 32, CPT\/Inf (2003) 30", "conclusion": "Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;Violation of Article 38 - Examination of the case-{general} (Article 38 - Obligation to furnish all necessary facilities);Violation of Article 4 of Protocol No. 4 - Prohibition of collective expulsion of aliens-{general} (Article 4 of Protocol No. 4 - Prohibition of collective expulsion of aliens);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Review of lawfulness of detention);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 13+5-1 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention;Article 5 - Right to liberty and security);Violation of Article 13+3 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment;Prohibition of torture);No violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 7 - Procedural safeguards relating to expulsion of aliens (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 7 - Expulsion of an alien;Lawfully resident);No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for family life);No violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Deprivation of property);No violation of Article 2 of Protocol No. 1 - Right to education-{general} (Article 2 of Protocol No. 1 - Right to education);Just satisfaction reserved", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Anatoly Kovler;Andr\u00e9 Potocki;Ann Power-Forde;Christos Rozakis;Corneliu B\u00eersan;Dmitry Dedov;Elisabeth Steiner;Fran\u00e7oise Tulkens;Isabelle Berro-Lef\u00e8vre;Jean-Paul Costa;Josep Casadevall;Karel Jungwiert;Khanlar Hajiyev;Luis L\u00f3pez Guerra;Mark Villiger;Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska;Nicolas Bratza;Nona Tsotsoria;P\u00e4ivi Hirvel\u00e4;Peer Lorenzen;Rait Maruste;Renate Jaeger;Vincent A. De Gaetano;Zdravka Kalaydjieva", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0703JUD001325507" }, "447": { "webcast_id": "1325507_13062012", "hearing_date": "2012-06-13 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Georgia v. Russia (I) (no. 13255\/07) Just satisfaction", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "13255\/07", "case_id": "001-189019", "case_name": "CASE OF GEORGIA v. RUSSIA (I)", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-189019", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 12, "document_date": "2019-01-31 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "", "represented_by": "DZAMASHVILI B. ", "respondent": "RUS", "articles": "33;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Ali\u0161i\u0107 and Others v. Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Serbia, Slovenia and the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia [GC], no. 60642\/08, \u00a7 142, ECHR 2014;Ananyev and Others v. Russia, nos. 42525\/07 and 60800\/08, \u00a7 142, 10 January 2012;Berdzenishvili and Others v. Russia, nos. 14594\/07 and 6 others, 20 December 2016;Burmych and Others v. Ukraine (striking out) [GC], nos. 46852\/13 et al., 12 October 2017;Chiragov and Others v. Armenia (just satisfaction) [GC], no. 13216\/05, 12 December 2017;Cyprus v. Turkey (just satisfaction), [GC], no. 25781\/94, ECHR 2014;Demopoulos and Others v. Turkey (dec.) [GC], nos. 46113\/99 and 7 others, \u00a7 69, ECHR 2010;Georgia v. Russia (I) [GC], no. 13255\/07, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Greens and M.T. v. the United Kingdom, nos. 60041\/08 and 60054\/08, \u00a7 97, ECHR 2010 (extracts);Idalov v. Russia [GC], no. 5826\/03, \u00a7 94, 22 May 2012;Janowiec and Others v. Russia [GC], nos. 55508\/07 and 29520\/09, \u00a7 202, ECHR 2013;Lisnyy v. Ukraine and Russia, nos. 5355\/15, 44913\/15 and 50852\/15, 5 July 2016;Sargsyan v. Azerbaijan (just satisfaction) [GC], no. 40167\/06, 12 December 2017;Varnava and Others v. Turkey [GC], nos. 16064\/90 and 8 others, ECHR 2009", "external_sources": "Articles 30 and 31 of the Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts (2001) of the Commission of International Law (United Nations)", "conclusion": "Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Andr\u00e9 Potocki;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Branko Lubarda;Dmitry Dedov;Ganna Yudkivska;Georgios A. Serghides;Guido Raimondi;Jon Fridrik Kj\u00f8lbro;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Marko Bo\u0161njak;M\u0101rti\u0146\u0161 Mits;Pauliine Koskelo;Robert Spano;Vincent A. De Gaetano;Gabriele Kucsko-Stadlmayer", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0131JUD001325507" }, "448": { "webcast_id": "1325507_13062012", "hearing_date": "2012-06-13 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Georgia v. Russia (I) (no. 13255\/07) Just satisfaction", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "13255\/07", "case_id": "001-93425", "case_name": "GEORGIA v. RUSSIA (I)", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-93425", "type": "DECISIONS", "typedescription": 8, "document_date": "", "collection": "CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG", "importance": 2, "court": "23", "issue": "", "represented_by": "N\/A", "respondent": "RUS", "articles": "33;35;35-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Ireland v. the United Kingdom, 18 January 1978, \u00a7 159, Series A no. 25;Akdivar and Others v. Turkey, 16 September 1996, \u00a7 68, Reports of Judgments and Decisions, 1996-IV;Denmark v. Turkey (dec), no. 34382\/97, 8 June 1999 Eur. Comm. H.R. Nos. 9940-9944\/82, Dec. 6.12.83, DR 35, \u00a7\u00a719, 21-22;No. 25781\/94, Dec. 28.6.96, D.R. 86", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Preliminary objections joined to merits;Admissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Six-month period", "separate_opinion": "", "judges": "Anatoly Kovler;Karel Jungwiert;Mark Villiger;Nona Tsotsoria;Peer Lorenzen;Rait Maruste;Renate Jaeger", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0630DEC001325507" }, "449": { "webcast_id": "2172211_12062012", "hearing_date": "2012-06-12 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Oleksandr Volkov v. Ukraine (no. 21722\/11)", "hearing_type": "Chamber hearing", "appno": "21722\/11", "case_id": "001-115871", "case_name": "CASE OF OLEKSANDR VOLKOV v. UKRAINE", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-115871", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 14, "document_date": "2013-01-09 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "23", "issue": "Sections 19-21 and 23 of the Judges (Election and Dismissal) Act 2004 ; Article 84 and 131 of the Constitution ; HCJ Act 1998 ; Status of Members of Parliament Act 1992 ; Rules of Parliament ; Article 171-1 \u00a7\u00a7 1 and 5 of the Code of Administrative Justice ; Sections 10, 20 and 41 of the Judicial System Act 2002", "represented_by": "LEACH Ph. ; GORDON J.", "respondent": "UKR", "articles": "6;6-1;8;8-1;8-2;41;46;46-2", "strasbourg_caselaw": "A. v. Norway, no. 28070\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 63 and 64, 9 April 2009;Ajdaric v. Croatia, no. 20883\/09, 13 December 2011;Albert and Le Compte v. Belgium, 10 February 1983, \u00a7\u00a7 29-30, Series A no. 58;Aleksanyan v. Russia, no. 46468\/06, \u00a7 240, 22 December 2008;Argyrou and Others v. Greece, no. 10468\/04, \u00a7 24, 15 January 2009;Assanidze v. Georgia [GC], no. 71503\/01, \u00a7\u00a7 198 and 202-203, ECHR 2004-II;Bayer v. Germany, no. 8453\/04, \u00a7 37, 16 July 2009;Bigaeva v. Greece, no. 26713\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 22-25, 28 May 2009;Bogatova v. Ukraine, no. 5231\/04, \u00a7 13, 7 October 2010;Broniowski v. Poland [GC], no. 31443\/96, \u00a7 194, ECHR 2004-V;Brualla G\u00f3mez de la Torre v Spain, 19 December 1997, \u00a7 41, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-VIII;Brudnicka and Others v. Poland, no. 54723\/00, \u00a7 38, ECHR 2005-II;Brumarescu v. Romania (just satisfaction) [GC], no. 28342\/95, \u00a7 20, ECHR 2001-I;Bryan v. the United Kingdom, 22 November 1995, \u00a7\u00a7 44 - 47, Series A no. 335-A;Buscarini v. San Marino (dec.), no. 31657\/96, 4 May 2000;C. v. Belgium, 7 August 1996, \u00a7 25, Reports 1996-III;C.G. and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 1365\/07, \u00a7 39, 24 April 2008;De Cubber v. Belgium, 26 October 1984, \u00a7 26, Series A no. 86;Diya 97 v. Ukraine, no. 19164\/04, \u00a7 47, 21 October 2010;Engel and Others v. the Netherlands, 8 June 1976, \u00a7\u00a7 82-83, Series A no. 22;Fatullayev v. Azerbaijan, no. 40984\/07, \u00a7\u00a7 176 and 177, 22 April 2010;Fey v. Austria, 24 February 1993, Series A no. 255, \u00a7\u00a7 28 and 30;Findlay v the United Kingdom, 25 February 1997, \u00a7 73, Reports 1997-I;Fruni v. Slovakia, no. 8014\/07, \u00a7134, 21 June 2011;Goodwin v. the United Kingdom, 27 March 1996, \u00a7 33, Reports 1996-II;Gorzelik and Others v. Poland [GC], no. 44158\/98, \u00a7\u00a7 64-65, ECHR 2004-I;Gurov v. Moldova, no. 36455\/02, \u00a7 37-39, 11 July 2006;Huseyn and Others v. Azerbaijan, nos. 35485\/05, 45553\/05, 35680\/05 and 36085\/05, \u00a7 262, 26 July 2011;Ilascu and Others v. Moldova and Russia [GC], no. 48787\/99, \u00a7 487, ECHR 2004-VII;Kleyn and Others v. the Netherlands [GC], nos. 39343\/98, 39651\/98, 43147\/98 and 46664\/99, \u00a7 193, ECHR 2003-VI;Kopp v. Switzerland, 25 March 1998, \u00a7 55, Reports 1998-II;Kyprianou v. Cyprus [GC], no. 73797\/01, \u00a7 119, ECHR 2005-XIII;Le Compte, Van Leuven and De Meyere v. Belgium, 23 June 1981, \u00a7 58, Series A no. 43;Lungoci v. Romania, no. 62710\/00, 26 January 2006;Maestri v. Italy [GC], no. 39748\/98, \u00a7 47, ECHR 2004-I;Matyjek v. Poland (dec.), no. 38184\/03, \u00a7\u00a7 53 and 54, ECHR 2006-VII;Micallef v. Malta [GC], no. 17056\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 99 and 100, ECHR 2009;Niemietz v. Germany, 16 December 1992, \u00a7 29, Series A no. 251-B;Oberschlick v. Austria (no. 1), 23 May 1991, \u00a7\u00a7 50-52, Series A no. 204;\u00d6calan v. Turkey [GC], no. 46221\/99, \u00a7 210, ECHR 2005-IV;Olujic v. Croatia, no. 22330\/05, \u00a7 31-45, 5 February 2009;\u00d6zpinar v. Turkey, no. 20999\/04, \u00a7\u00a7 43-48, 19 October 2010;P.G. and J.H. v. the United Kingdom, no. 44787\/98, \u00a7 46, ECHR 2001-IX;Papamichalopoulos and Others v. Greece (Article 50), 31 October 1995, \u00a7 34, Series A no. 330-B;Pfeifer v. Austria, no. 12556\/03, \u00a7 35, 15 November 2007;Posokhov v. Russia, no. 63486\/00, \u00a7 39, ECHR 2003-IV;Pretty v. the United Kingdom, no. 2346\/02, \u00a7 61, ECHR 2002-III;Pullar v. the United Kingdom, 10 June 1996, \u00a7 32, Reports 1996-III;Sacilor-Lormines v. France, no. 65411\/01, \u00a7 62, ECHR 2006-XIII;Savino and Others v. Italy, nos. 17214\/05, 20329\/05 and 42113\/04, \u00a7\u00a7 72-75, 28 April 2009;Scordino v. Italy (no. 1) [GC], no. 36813\/97, \u00a7\u00a7 190 and 191, ECHR 2006-V;Scozzari and Giunta v. Italy [GC], nos. 39221\/98 and 41963\/98, \u00a7 249, ECHR 2000-VIII;Sidabras and D\u017eiautas v. Lithuania, nos. 55480\/00 and 59330\/00, \u00a7 47, ECHR 2004-VIII;Stafford v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 46295\/99, \u00a7 78, ECHR 2002-IV;Stubbings and Others v. the United Kingdom, 22 October 1996, \u00a7 51, Reports 1996-IV;Suk\u00fct v. Turkey (dec.), no. 59773\/00, 11 September 2007;Tepeli and Others v. Turkey (dec.), no. 31876\/96, 11 September 2001;Tsfayo v. the United Kingdom, no. 60860\/00, \u00a7\u00a7 42-43, 14 November 2006;Vereinigung demokratischer Soldaten \u00d6sterreichs and Gubi v. Austria, 19 December 1994, \u00a7 31, Series A no. 302;Vilho Eskelinen and Others v. Finland [GC], no. 63235\/00, \u00a7 62, ECHR 2007-IV;Werner v. Poland, no. 26760\/95, \u00a7\u00a7 43 and 44, 15 November 2001;Wettstein v. Switzerland, no. 33958\/96, \u00a7 42, ECHR 2000-XII", "external_sources": "European Charter on the statute for judges of 8-10 July 1998 (Department of Legal Affairs of the Council of Europe Document (98)23);Joint Opinion on the Law Amending Certain Legislative Acts of Ukraine in Relation to the Prevention of Abuse of the Right to Appeal by the Venice Commission and the Directorate of Co-operation within the Directorate General of Human Rights and Legal Affairs of the Council of Europe, adopted by the Venice Commission at its 84th Plenary Session (Venice, 15-16 October 2010, CDL-AD(2010)029);Report by Thomas Hammarberg, Commissioner for Human Rights of the Council of Europe, following his visit to Ukraine (19-26 November 2011), CommDH(2012)10", "conclusion": "Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Impartial tribunal;Independent tribunal);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Tribunal established by law);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);Respondent State to take individual measures (Article 46-2 - Individual measures);Respondent State to take measures of a general character (Article 46-2 - Legislative amendments);Pecuniary damage - reserved;Non-pecuniary damage - award", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Andr\u00e9 Potocki;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Ann Power-Forde;Dean Spielmann;Ganna Yudkivska;Mark Villiger", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0109JUD002172211" }, "450": { "webcast_id": "2172211_12062012", "hearing_date": "2012-06-12 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Oleksandr Volkov v. Ukraine (no. 21722\/11)", "hearing_type": "Chamber hearing", "appno": "21722\/11", "case_id": "001-180551", "case_name": "CASE OF OLEKSANDR VOLKOV v. UKRAINE", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-180551", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 19, "document_date": "2018-02-06 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "7", "issue": "", "represented_by": "LEACH Ph.", "respondent": "UKR", "articles": "37;37-1-b", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Struck out of the list (Article 37-1-b - Matter resolved)", "separate_opinion": "FALSE", "judges": "Carlo Ranzoni;Ganna Yudkivska;Marko Bo\u0161njak;Vincent A. De Gaetano;Georges Ravarani", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0206JUD002172211" }, "451": { "webcast_id": "2172211_12062012", "hearing_date": "2012-06-12 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Oleksandr Volkov v. Ukraine (no. 21722\/11)", "hearing_type": "Chamber hearing", "appno": "21722\/11", "case_id": "001-107361", "case_name": "VOLKOV v. UKRAINE", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-107361", "type": "DECISIONS", "typedescription": 9, "document_date": "", "collection": "CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "23", "issue": "", "represented_by": "N\/A", "respondent": "UKR", "articles": "6;8;13", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Partly inadmissible", "separate_opinion": "", "judges": "Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Dean Spielmann;Ganna Yudkivska;Isabelle Berro-Lef\u00e8vre;Karel Jungwiert;Mark Villiger", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1018DEC002172211" }, "452": { "webcast_id": "3963009_16052012", "hearing_date": "2012-05-16 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "El-Masri v. \"the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia\" (no. 39630\/09)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "39630\/09", "case_id": "001-115621", "case_name": "CASE OF EL-MASRI v. \"THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA\"", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-115621", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2012-12-13 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "", "represented_by": "SKILBECK R. ; GOLDSTON J. ; PAVLI D.", "respondent": "MKD", "articles": "3;5;5-1;5-4;8;8-1;8-2;13;35;35-1;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Abuyeva and Others v. Russia, no 27065\/05, \u00a7 174, 2 December 2010;Aksoy v. Turkey, 18 December 1996, Reports 1996-VI;Al-Moayad v. Germany (dec.), no 35865\/03, , 20 January 2007;Al-Skeini and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 55721\/07, \u00a7 167, ECHR 2011;Angelova v. Bulgaria, no 38361\/97, ECHR 2002-IV;Assenov and Others v. Bulgaria, 28 October 1998, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-VIII;Association \u00ab 21 December 1989 \u00bb and Others v. Romania, nos. 33810\/07 and 18817\/08, \u00a7 135, 24 May 2011;Babar Ahmad and Others v. the United Kingdom (dec.), nos. 24027\/07, 11949\/08 and 36742\/08, 6 July 2010;Bati and Others v. Turkey, nos. 33097\/96 and 57834\/00, \u00a7 136, ECHR 2004-IV;Bitiyeva and X v. Russia, nos. 57953\/00 and 37392\/03, \u00a7 118;Boicenco v. Moldova, no 41088\/05, \u00a7 123, 11 July 2006;Boyle and Rice v. the United Kingdom, 27 April 1988, \u00a7 52, Series A no 131;\u00c7akici v. Turkey [GC], no 23657\/94, \u00a7 85, ECHR 1999-IV;Campbell and Cosans v. the United Kingdom, 25 February 1982, \u00a7 26, Series A no 48;Chahal v. the United Kingdom, 15 November 1996, Reports 1996-V;Chita\u00efev v. Russia, no 59334\/00, \u00a7 173, 18 January 2007;Cobzaru v. Romania, no 48254\/99, 26 July 2007;Corsacov v. Moldova, no 18944\/02, \u00a7 68, 4 April 2006;Creanga v. Romania [GC], no 29226\/03, 23 February 2012;Cruz Varas and Others v. Sweden, 20 March 1991, Series A no 201;Dedovskiy and Others v. Russia, no 7178\/03, \u00a7 92, ECHR 2008;Denis Vasilyev v. Russia, no 32704\/04, \u00a7 157, 17 December 2009;Denisenko and Bogdanchikov v. Russia, no 3811\/02, \u00a7 83, 12 February 2009;Dennis and Others v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no 76573\/01, 2 July 2002;Dikme v. Turkey, no 20869\/92, , ECHR 2000-VIII;Dzeladinov and Others v. \u201cthe former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia\u201d, no 13252\/02, 10 April 2008;Egmez v. Cyprus, no 30873\/96, \u00a7 78, ECHR 2000-XII;Ergi v. Turkey, 28 July 1998, \u00a7\u00a7 83-84, Reports 1998-IV;Estamirov and Others v. Russia, no 60272\/00, \u00a7\u00a7 77 and 120, 12 October 2006;G\u00e4fgen v. Germany [GC], no 22978\/05, \u00a7 91, ECHR 2010;Georgiy Bykov v. Russia, no 24271\/03, 14 October 2010;Gisayev v. Russia, no 14811\/04, \u00a7\u00a7 152-153, 20 January 2011;Gorgiev v. \u201cthe former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia\u201d, no 26984\/05, \u00a7 64, 19 April 2012;G\u00fcl v. Turkey, no 22676\/93, \u00a7 89, 14 December 2000;Hilal v. the United Kingdom, no 45276\/99, \u00a7 60, ECHR 2001-II;Ilascu and Others v. Moldova and Russia [GC], no 48787\/99, ECHR 2004-VII;Ilhan v. Turkey [GC], no 22277\/93, \u00a7 85, ECHR 2000-VII;Iljina and Saruliene v. Lithuania, no 32293\/05, \u00a7 47, 15 March 2011;Ireland v. the United Kingdom, 18 January 1978, , Series A no 25;Jabari v. Turkey, no 40035\/98, \u00a7 50, ECHR 2000-VIII;Jalloh v. Germany [GC], no 54810\/00, ECHR 2006-IX;Jasar v. \u201cthe former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia\u201d, no 69908\/01, 15 February 2007;Kadirova and Others v. Russia, no 5432\/07, 27 March 2012;Khadzhialiyev and Others v. Russia, no 3013\/04, \u00a7 106, 6 November 2008;Khashiyev and Akayeva v. Russia, nos. 57942\/00 and 57945\/00, \u00a7 183, 24 February 2005;Krastanov v. Bulgaria, no 50222\/99, \u00a7 53, 30 September 2004;Kroon and Others v. the Netherlands, 27 October 1994, \u00a7 31, Series A no 297-C;Labita v. Italy [GC], no 26772\/95, ECHR 2000-IV;M.C. v. Bulgaria, no 39272\/98, \u00a7 149, ECHR 2003-XII;Mahmut Kaya v. Turkey, no 22535\/93, \u00a7 115, ECHR 2000-III;Mamatkoulov and Askarov v. Turkey [GC], nos. 46827\/99 and 46951\/99, ECHR 2005-I;McKerr v. the United Kingdom, (dec.), no 28883\/95, 4 April 2000;Medova v. Russia, no 25385\/04, \u00a7 123, 15 January 2009;Mehmet Emin Y\u00fcksel v. Turkey, no 40154\/98, \u00a7 37, 20 July 2004;Membres de la Congr\u00e9gation des t\u00e9moins de J\u00e9hovah de Gldani and Others v. Georgia, no 71156\/01, \u00a7\u00a7 124-125, 3 May 2007;Musayev and Others v. Russia, nos. 57941\/00, 58699\/00 and 60403\/00, \u00a7 175, 26 July 2007;\u00d6calan v. Turkey [GC], no 46221\/99, ECHR 2005-IV;Ognyanova and Choban v. Bulgaria, no 46317\/99, \u00a7 107, 23 February 2006;Ogur v. Turkey [GC], no 21594\/93, ECHR 1999-III;Olsson v. Sweden (no 1), 24 March 1988, \u00a7 59, Series A no 130;Orhan v. Turkey, no 25656\/94, 18 June 2002;Othman (Abu Qatada) v. the United Kingdom, no 8139\/09, \u00a7 233, 17 January 2012;Paul and Audrey Edwards v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no 46477\/99, 4 June 2001;Pretty v. the United Kingdom, no 2346\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 61 and 65, ECHR 2002-III;Quinn v. France, 22 March 1995, \u00a7 42, Series A no 311;Raninen v. Finland, 16 December 1997, \u00a7 63, Reports 1997-VIII;Rantsev v. Cyprus and Russia, no 25965\/04, \u00a7 207, ECHR 2010;Ribitsch v. Austria, 4 December 1995, Series A no 336;Rupa v. Romania (no 1), no 58478\/00, \u00a7 97, 16 December 2008;Saadi v. Italy [GC], no 37201\/06, ECHR 2008;Sabri G\u00fcnes v. Turkey [GC], no 27396\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 39-40, 29 June 2012;Salman v. Turkey [GC], no 21986\/93, \u00a7 100, ECHR 2000-VII;Selmouni v. France [GC], no 25803\/94, \u00a7 95, ECHR 1999-V;Soering v. the United Kingdom, 7 July 1989, Series A no 161;Storck v. Germany, no 61603\/00, \u00a7\u00a7 100-101, ECHR 2005-V;S\u00fcheyla Aydin v. Turkey, no 25660\/94, \u00a7 208, 24 May 2005;Sulejmanov v. \u201cthe former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia\u201d, no 69875\/01, 24 April 2008;Tanis and Others v. Turkey, no 65899\/01, \u00a7 160, ECHR 2005-VIII;Tanrikulu v. Turkey [GC], no 23763\/94, \u00a7 104, ECHR 1999-IV;Trajkoski v. \u201cthe former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia\u201d, no 13191\/02, 7 February 2008;Varnava and Others v. Turkey [GC], nos. 16064\/90, 16065\/90, 16066\/90, 16068\/90, 16069\/90, 16070\/90, 16071\/90, 16072\/90 and 16073\/90, ECHR 2009;Vilvarajah and Others v. the United Kingdom, 30 October 1991, Series A no 215;Walker v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no 34979\/97, ECHR 2000-I;Wieser v. Austria, no 2293\/03, \u00a7 40, 22 February 2007;Yusupova and Zaurbekov v. Russia, no 22057\/02, \u00a7 52, 9 October 2008;Z and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 29392\/95, ECHR 2001-V;Zontul v. Greece, no 12294\/07, \u00a7 89, 17 January 2012", "external_sources": "The 2006 Marty report;The 2007 Marty report;Report of the UN Special Rapporteur on the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms while Countering Terrorism, A\/HRC\/10\/3, 4 February 2009;Council of Europe, Guidelines of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on eradicating impunity for serious human rights violations, 30 March 2011;European Commission for Democracy through Law (Venice Commission), Opinion on the international legal obligations of Council of Europe Member States in respect of secret detention facilities and inter-state transport of prisoners (no. 363\/2005, 17 March 2006);Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, Resolution 1433 on lawfulness of detentions by the United States in Guant\u00e1namo Bay, adopted on 26 April 2005;Statement of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights on detention of Taliban and Al-Qaeda prisoners at the US Base in Guant\u00e1namo Bay, Cuba, 16 January 2002;Amnesty International, Memorandum to the US Government on the rights of people in US custody in Afghanistan and Guant\u00e1namo Bay, April 2002;Human Rights Watch, \u201cUnited States, Presumption of Guilt: Human Rights Abuses of Post-September 11 Detainees\u201d, Vol. 14, No. 4 (G), August 2002;Human Rights Watch, \u201cUnited States: Reports of Torture of Al-Qaeda Suspects\u201d, 26 December 2002;International Helsinki Federation for Human Rights, \u201cAnti-terrorism Measures, Security and Human Rights: Developments in Europe, Central Asia and North America in the Aftermath of September 11\u201d, Report, April 2003;Amnesty International Report 2003 - United States of America, 28 May 2003;Amnesty International, \u201cUnlawful detention of six men from Bosnia-Herzegovina in Guant\u00e1namo Bay\u201d, 29 May 2003;Amnesty International, \u201cUnited States of America, The threat of a bad example: Undermining international standards as \u2018war on terror\u2019 detentions continue\u201d, 18 August 2003;Amnesty International, \u201cIncommunicado detention\/Fear of ill-treatment\u201d, 20 August 2003;International Committee of the Red Cross, United States: ICRC President urges progress on detention-related issues, news release 04\/03, 16 January 2004;Court of Appeal of England and Wales (Civil Division), Abbasi and Another v. Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs and Secretary of State for the Home Department, Case No: C\/2002\/0617A;0617B, 6 November 2002;United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, Falen Gherebi v. George Walker Bush;Donald H. Rumsfeld, D.C. No. CV-03-01267-AHM, 18 December 2003;UN Committee against Torture, Agiza v. Sweden, Communication No 233\/2003, UN Doc. CAT\/C\/34\/D\/233\/2003 (2005);UN Human Rights Committee, Alzery v. Sweden, UN Doc. CCPR\/C\/88\/D\/1416\/2005 (2006);Article 36 \u00a7 1 (b) of the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations;International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance;Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, Resolution 1463 on enforced disappearances;United Nations Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment\n\nn\u00b0", "conclusion": "Preliminary objection dismissed (Article 35-1 - Six-month period);Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Torture) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Extradition) (the United States of America);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention;Article 5-4 - Review of lawfulness of detention);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Deprivation of liberty);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Deprivation of liberty);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for family life;Respect for private life);Violation of Article 13 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy);Non-pecuniary damage - award", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Dean Spielmann;Elisabeth Steiner;Erik M\u00f8se;Fran\u00e7oise Tulkens;Helen Keller;Isabelle Berro-Lef\u00e8vre;Josep Casadevall;Julia Laffranque;Karel Jungwiert;Khanlar Hajiyev;Ledi Bianku;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Luis L\u00f3pez Guerra;Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska;Nicolas Bratza;Peer Lorenzen;Vincent A. De Gaetano", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1213JUD003963009" }, "453": { "webcast_id": "3963009_16052012", "hearing_date": "2012-05-16 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "El-Masri v. \"the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia\" (no. 39630\/09)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "39630\/09", "case_id": "001-110887", "case_name": "EL-MASRI v. \"THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA\"", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-110887", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "2010-09-28 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "SKILBECK RUPERTGOLDSTON, J ; GOLDSTON, J ; GOLDSTON, J", "respondent": "MKD", "articles": "3;5;5-1;8;8-1;10;13", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Communicated", "separate_opinion": "FALSE", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "454": { "webcast_id": "649211_17042012", "hearing_date": "2012-04-17 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Lutsenko v. Ukraine (no. 6492\/11)", "hearing_type": "Chamber hearing", "appno": "6492\/11", "case_id": "001-112013", "case_name": "CASE OF LUTSENKO v. UKRAINE", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-112013", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2012-07-03 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 2, "court": "23", "issue": "Articles 19, 29, 34, 62 and 63 of the Constitution ; Articles 191, 364 and 365 of the Criminal Code ; Articles 43, 48, 106, 135, 142, 148, 150, 151, 165 and 218 of the Code of Criminal Procedure", "represented_by": "FOMIN I. ; TELYCHENKO V. ; BUSHCHENKO A.", "respondent": "UKR", "articles": "5;5-1;5-1-c;5-2;5-3;5-4;18;18+5;35;35-1;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "A. and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 3455\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 203 - 204, ECHR 2009-...;Ambruszkiewicz v. Poland, no. 38797\/03, \u00a7\u00a7 29-32, 4 May 2006;Aquilina v. Malta [GC], no. 25642\/94, \u00a7 49, ECHR 1999-III;Bouamar v. Belgium, 29 February 1988, \u00a7 60, Series A no. 129;Butkevicius v. Lithuania, no. 48297\/99, \u00a7 43, ECHR 2002-II;Cebotari v. Moldova (no. 35615\/06, \u00a7\u00a7 46 et seq., 13 November 2007;Cumpana and Mazare v. Romania [GC], no. 33348\/96, \u00a7 115, ECHR 2004-XI;Fodale v. Italy, no. 70148\/01, \u00a7 41, ECHR 2006-VII;Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979\/96, \u00a7 43, ECHR 2000-VII;Gusinskiy v. Russia, no. 70276\/01, \u00a7 75, ECHR 2004-IV;Gusinskiy v. Russia (cited above, \u00a7 73-78);Jehovah\u2019s Witnesses of Moscow v. Russia, no. 302\/02, \u00a7 198, 10 June 2010;Kharchenko v. Ukraine, no. 40107\/02, \u00a7 98, 10 February 2011;Khayredinov v. Ukraine, no. 38717\/04, \u00a7 26, 14 October 2010;Khodorkovskiy v. Russia, no. 5829\/04, \u00a7\u00a7 255 and 258, 31 May 2011;Ladent v. Poland, no. 11036\/03, \u00a7 55, 18 March 2008;Lebedev v. Russia, no. 4493\/04, \u00a7 77, 25 October 2007;Leva v. Moldova, no. 12444\/05, \u00a7 61, 15 December 2009;Mahmudov and Agazade v. Azerbaijan, no. 35877\/04, \u00a7 50, 18 December 2008;Mooren v. Germany [GC], no. 11364\/03, \u00a7\u00a7 72, 77 and 78, 9 July 2009;Nechiporuk and Yonkalo v. Ukraine, no. 42310\/04, \u00a7 208, 21 April 2011;Ne\u0161t\u00e1k v. Slovakia, no. 65559\/01, \u00a7 74, 27 February 2007;Smirnova v. Russia, nos. 46133\/99 and 48183\/99, \u00a7 81, ECHR 2003-IX (extracts);Solovey and Zozulya v. Ukraine, nos. 40774\/02 and 4048\/03, \u00a7 70, 27 November 2008", "external_sources": "Country Reports on Human Rights Practices by the US Department of State;European Parliament Resolution of 9 June 2011 on Ukraine: the cases of Yulia Tymoshenko and other members of the former government;Freedom House Report on the State of Democracy and Human Rights in Ukraine: Sounding the Alarm: Protecting Democracy in Ukraine;\u201cPreliminary Report on the trials against former Minister of Interior Yurij Lutsenko and former First Deputy Minister of Justice Yevhen Korniychuk\u201d issued by the Danish Helsinki Committee on 28 April 2011", "conclusion": "Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Article 35-1 - Exhaustion of domestic remedies);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Deprivation of liberty;Lawful arrest or detention;Procedure prescribed by law;Article 5-1-c - Bringing before competent legal authority);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-2 - Information on reasons for arrest;Prompt information);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Reasonableness of pre-trial detention);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Procedural guarantees of review;Review of lawfulness of detention);Violation of Article 18+5 - Limitation on use of restrictions on rights (Article 18 - Restrictions for unauthorised purposes) (Article 5 - Right to liberty and security);Non-pecuniary damage - award", "separate_opinion": "FALSE", "judges": "Andr\u00e9 Potocki;Ann Power-Forde;Dean Spielmann;Ganna Yudkivska;Karel Jungwiert;Mark Villiger", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0703JUD000649211" }, "455": { "webcast_id": "1657408_04042012", "hearing_date": "2012-04-04 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Fabris v. France (no. 16574\/08) Article 41 - Just satisfaction", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "16574\/08", "case_id": "001-116716", "case_name": "CASE OF FABRIS v. FRANCE", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-116716", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 14, "document_date": "2013-02-07 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Section 25(2) of the 2001 Law ; Articles 1077-1 and 1077-2 of the Civil Code", "represented_by": "OTTAN A.", "respondent": "FRA", "articles": "14;14+P1-1;41;46;46-1;46-2;P1-1;P1-1-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Alboize-Barthes and Alboize-Montezume v. France (dec.), no 44421\/04, 21 October 2008;Albu and Others v. Romania, no 34796\/09 et seq., \u00a7 34, 10 May 2012;Ali\u0161ic and Others v. Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Serbia, Slovenia and\u201cthe former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia\u201d (dec.), no 60642\/08, \u00a7 52, 17 October 2011;Andrejeva v. Latvia [GC], no 55707\/00, ECHR 2009;Antoni v. the Czech Republic, no 18010\/06, 25 November 2010;Association nationale des pupilles de la Nation v. France (dec.), no 22718\/08, 6 October 2009;Beian v. Romania (no 1), no 30658\/05, \u00a7 39, ECHR 2007-V (extracts);Beyeler v. Italy [GC], no 33202\/96, \u00a7 100, ECHR 2000-I;Bozcaada Kimisis Teodoku Rum Ortodoks Kilisesi Vakfi v. Turkey, nos. 37639\/03, 37655\/03, 26736\/04 and 42670\/04, \u00a7 41, 3 March 2009;Brauer v. Germany, no 3545\/04, 28 May 2009;Brumarescu v. Romania [GC], no 28342\/95, \u00a7 61, ECHR 1999-VII;Camp and Bourimi v. the Netherlands, no 28369\/95, ECHR 2000-X;Compagnie des gaz de p\u00e9trole Primagaz v. France, no 29613\/08, \u00a7 18, 21 December 2010;Depalle v. France [GC], no 34044\/02, ECHR 2010;Di Marco v. Italy (merits), no 32521\/05, \u00a7 50, 26 April 2011;E.S. v. France (dec.), no 49714\/06, 10 February 2009;Inze v. Austria, 28 October 1987, Series A no 126;Johnston and Others v. Ireland, 18 December 1986, Series A no 112;Karaman v. Turkey, no 6489\/03, \u00a7 30, 15 January 2008;Konstantin Markin v. Russia [GC], no 30078\/06, ECHR 2012 (extracts);Kopeck\u00fd v. Slovakia [GC], no 44912\/98, ECHR 2004-IX;Larkos v. Cyprus [GC], no 29515\/95, \u00a7\u00a7 30-31, ECHR 1999-I;Magnin v. France (dec.), no 26219\/08, 10 May 2012;Malhous v. the Czech Republic (dec.) [GC], no 33071\/96, ECHR 2000-XII;Marckx v. Belgium, 13 June 1979, Series A no 31;Mazurek v. France, no 34406\/97, 1 February 2000, ECHR 2000-II;Merger and Cros v. France, no 68864\/01, 22 December 2004;Mork v. Germany, nos. 31047\/04 and 43386\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 28 to 30 and 54, 9 June 2011;Nejdet Sahin and Perihan Sahin v. Turkey [GC], no 13279\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 56-57, 20 October 2011;Nerva and Others v. the United Kingdom, no 42295\/98, \u00a7 43, ECHR 2002-VIII;Padovani v. Italy, 26 February 1993, \u00a7 24, Series A no 257-B;Petrovic v. Austria, 27 March 1998, \u00a7 22, Reports 1998-II;Pla and Puncernau v. Andorra, no 69498\/01, ECHR 2004-VIII;Plalam S.P.A. v. Italy (merits), no 16021\/02, \u00a7 37, 18 May 2010;Pressos Compan\u00eda Naviera S.A. and Others v. Belgium, 20 November 1995, \u00a7 31, Series A no 332;Prince Hans-Adam II of Liechtenstein v. Germany [GC], no 42527\/98, \u00a7 85, ECHR 2001-VIII;Saghinadze and Others v. Georgia, no 18768\/05, \u00a7 103, 27 May 2010;Salah v. the Netherlands, no 8196\/02, \u00a7 77, ECHR 2006-IX (extracts);Slivenko and Others v. Latvia (dec.) [GC], no 48321\/99, \u00a7 121, ECHR 2002-II (extracts);Stec and Others v. the United Kingdom (dec.) [GC], nos. 65731\/01 and 65900\/01, \u00a7 55, ECHR 2005-X;Stec and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 65731\/01 and 65900\/01, \u00a7\u00a7 51 and 52, ECHR 2006-VI;Stretch v. the United Kingdom, no 44277\/98, \u00a7 32, 24 June 2003;Taron v. Germany (dec.), no 53126\/07, 29 May 2012;Van Raalte v. the Netherlands, 21 February 1997, \u00a7 33, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-I;Verein gegen Tierfabriken Schweiz (VgT) v. Switzerland (no 2) [GC], no 32772\/02, \u00a7 61, ECHR 2009;Vermeire v. Belgium, 29 November 1991, Series A no 214-C;Wagner and J.M.W.L. v. Luxembourg, no 76240\/01, \u00a7 96, 28 June 2007;Zarb Adami v. Malta, no 17209\/02, \u00a7 42, ECHR 2006-VIII", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Violation of Article 14+P1-1 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions;Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property);Just satisfaction reserved", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Alvina Gyulumyan;Andr\u00e1s Saj\u00f3;Andr\u00e9 Potocki;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Dean Spielmann;Egbert Myjer;Elisabeth Steiner;Fran\u00e7oise Tulkens;George Nicolaou;Guido Raimondi;Isabelle Berro-Lef\u00e8vre;Jean-Paul Costa;Josep Casadevall;Karel Jungwiert;Lech Garlicki;Ledi Bianku;Mark Villiger;Nona Tsotsoria;Paulo Pinto De Albuquerque", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0207JUD001657408" }, "456": { "webcast_id": "1657408_04042012", "hearing_date": "2012-04-04 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Fabris v. France (no. 16574\/08) Article 41 - Just satisfaction", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "16574\/08", "case_id": "001-122353", "case_name": "CASE OF FABRIS v. FRANCE", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-122353", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 12, "document_date": "2013-06-28 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 2, "court": "8", "issue": "", "represented_by": "OTTAN A.", "respondent": "FRA", "articles": "37;37-1-b;39", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Struck out of the list (Article 37-1-b - Matter resolved)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Alvina Gyulumyan;Andr\u00e1s Saj\u00f3;Andr\u00e9 Potocki;Egbert Myjer;Elisabeth Steiner;Fran\u00e7oise Tulkens;George Nicolaou;Guido Raimondi;Josep Casadevall;Karel Jungwiert;Lech Garlicki;Ledi Bianku;Nona Tsotsoria;Paulo Pinto De Albuquerque", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0628JUD001657408" }, "457": { "webcast_id": "1657408_04042012", "hearing_date": "2012-04-04 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Fabris v. France (no. 16574\/08) Article 41 - Just satisfaction", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "16574\/08", "case_id": "001-105773", "case_name": "CASE OF FABRIS v. FRANCE", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-105773", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2011-07-21 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 3, "court": "23", "issue": "Articles 745, 757, 760 and 1075 -1077 of the Civil code ; Article 15 of Law no.2001-1135 of 3 December 2001 "on the rights of the surviving spouse and children born of adultery and modernising various provisions of the law of succession"", "represented_by": "OTTAN A.", "respondent": "FRA", "articles": "14;14+P1-1;P1-1;P1-1-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Alboize-Barthes and Alboize-Montezume v. France (dec.), no 44421\/04, 21 October 2008;Blecic v. Croatia ([GC], no 59532\/00, ECHR 2006-III;Brauer v. Germany, no 3545\/04, 28 May 2009;De Diego Nafr\u00eda v. Spain, no 46833\/99, \u00a7 39, 14 March 2002;E.S. v. France (dec.), 10 February 2009, no 49714\/06;Inze v. Austria, 28 October 1987, Series A no 126;Kopeck\u00fd v. Slovakia (no 44912\/98 [CG], \u00a7 38, ECHR 2004-IX);Larkos v. Cyprus [GC], no 29515\/95, \u00a7\u00a7 30-31, ECHR 1999-I;Malhous v. the Czech Republic (dec.) [GC], no 33071\/96, ECHR 2000-XII;Marckx v. Belgium, 13 June 1979, Series A no 31;Mazurek v. France, no 34406\/97, ECHR 2000-II;Merger and Cros v. France, no 68864\/01, 22 December 2004;Ostojic v. Croatia (dec.), no 16837\/02, ECHR 2002-IX;Pla and Puncernau v. Andorra, no 69498\/01, ECHR 2004-VIII;Stec and Others v. the United Kingdom (dec.) [GC], nos. 65731\/01 and 65900\/01, ECHR 2005-X", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "No violation of Art. 14+P1-1", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Dean Spielmann;Isabelle Berro-Lef\u00e8vre;Jean-Paul Costa;Mark Villiger", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0721JUD001657408" }, "458": { "webcast_id": "2268907_21032012", "hearing_date": "2012-03-21 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "De Souza Ribeiro v. France (no. 22689\/07)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "22689\/07", "case_id": "001-115498", "case_name": "CASE OF DE SOUZA RIBEIRO v. FRANCE", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-115498", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2012-12-13 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Article L. 511-4 (2) of the Code regulating the entry and residence of aliens and asylum-seekers", "represented_by": "MONGET SARRAIL D.", "respondent": "FRA", "articles": "8;8-1;8-2;13;13+8;34;41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Al-Nashif v. Bulgaria, no 50963\/99, \u00a7 133, 20 June 2002;Bati and Others v. Turkey, nos. 33097\/96 and 57834\/00, \u00a7 136, ECHR 2004-IV (extracts);Boultif v. Switzerland, no 54273\/00, \u00a7 46, ECHR 2001-IX;\u00dcner v. the Netherlands [GC], no 46410\/99, \u00a7 54, ECHR 2006-XII;\u00c7akici v. Turkey [GC], no 23657\/94, \u00a7 112, ECHR 1999-IV;Chahal v. the United Kingdom, 15 November 1996, \u00a7\u00a7 152 \u00e0 154, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-V;Chama\u00efev and Others v. Georgia and Russia, no 36378\/02, \u00a7 448, ECHR 2005-III;Conka v. Belgium, no 51564\/99, ECHR 2002-I;Doran v. Ireland, no 50389\/99, \u00a7 57, ECHR 2003-X;G.H.H. and Others v. Turkey, no 43258\/98, \u00a7 36, ECHR 2000-VIII;Gebremedhin [Gaberamadhien] v. France, no 25389\/05, ECHR 2007-II;Hirsi Jamaa and Others v. Italy [GC], no 27765\/09, 23 February 2012;I.M. v. France, no 9152\/09, 2 February 2012;Jabari v. Turkey, no 40035\/98, ECHR 2000-VIII;K. and T. v. Finland [GC], no 25702\/94, \u00a7\u00a7 140-141, ECHR 2001-VII;Khan v. Royaume-uni, no 35394\/97, \u00a7\u00a7 44 \u00e0 47, ECHR 2000-V;Kudla v. Poland [GC], no 30210\/96, ECHR 2000-XI;Leander v. Sweden, 26 March 1987, \u00a7\u00a7 77 and 81 \u00e0 83, Series A no 116;M. and Others v. Bulgaria, no 41416\/08, \u00a7\u00a7 122 \u00e0 132, 26 July 2011;M.S.S. v. Belgium and Greece [GC], no 30696\/09, \u00a7\u00a7 286-287, ECHR 2011;Rotaru v. Romania [GC], no 28341\/95, \u00a7 69, ECHR 2000-V;Taxquet v. Belgium [GC], no 926\/05, \u00a7 61, ECHR 2010;Vilvarajah and Others v. the United Kingdom, 30 October 1991, \u00a7 122, Series A no 215", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Article 34 - Victim);Violation of Article 13+8 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 8-2 - Interference;Prescribed by law;Article 8-1 - Respect for family life;Respect for private life;Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life;Expulsion) (Brazil);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed;Non-pecuniary damage - award", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Alvina Gyulumyan;Andr\u00e9 Potocki;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Corneliu B\u00eersan;Dean Spielmann;Egbert Myjer;Elisabet Fura;Erik M\u00f8se;Fran\u00e7oise Tulkens;Ineta Ziemele;Isabelle Berro-Lef\u00e8vre;Jean-Paul Costa;Karel Jungwiert;Lech Garlicki;Mark Villiger;Neboj\u0161a Vu\u010dini\u0107;Nicolas Bratza;P\u00e4ivi Hirvel\u00e4;Paulo Pinto De Albuquerque;Zdravka Kalaydjieva", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1213JUD002268907" }, "459": { "webcast_id": "2268907_21032012", "hearing_date": "2012-03-21 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "De Souza Ribeiro v. France (no. 22689\/07)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "22689\/07", "case_id": "001-105421", "case_name": "CASE OF DE SOUZA RIBEIRO v. FRANCE", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-105421", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2011-06-30 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 3, "court": "23", "issue": "Articles 511-4, L.514-1 and 2 of the Code regulating the entry and residence of aliens and asylum-seekers", "represented_by": "MONGET SARRAIL D.", "respondent": "FRA", "articles": "8;8-1;13;13+8;34", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Boyle and Rice c. the United Kingdom, 27 April 1988, \u00a7 52, Series A no 131;Chahal v. the United Kingdom, 15 November 1996, \u00a7 145, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-V;Conka v. Belgium, no 51564\/99, ECHR 2002-I;Gebremedhin [Gaberamadhien] v. France (dec.), no 25389\/05, \u00a7 36, 10 October 2006;Gebremedhin [Gaberamadhien] v. France, no 25389\/05, \u00a7 56, ECHR 2007-V;Jabari v. Turkey, no 40035\/98, \u00a7 50, ECHR 2000-VIII;Kaftailova v. Latvia, no 59653\/00, 21 October 2004;Mikheyeva c. Latvia (dec.), no 50029\/99, 12 September 2002;Rotaru c. Romania [GC], no 28341\/95, \u00a7 67, ECHR 2000-V", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Remainder inadmissible;No violation of Art. 13+8", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Dean Spielmann;Elisabet Fura;Isabelle Berro-Lef\u00e8vre;Jean-Paul Costa;Karel Jungwiert;Mark Villiger", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0630JUD002268907" }, "460": { "webcast_id": "4887608_07032012", "hearing_date": "2012-03-07 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Animal Defenders International c. United Kingdom (no. 48876\/08)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "48876\/08", "case_id": "001-119244", "case_name": "CASE OF ANIMAL DEFENDERS INTERNATIONAL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-119244", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2013-04-22 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Section 4 of the Human Rights Act 1998 ; Television Act 1954 ; Sections 319-321 and 333 of the Communications Act 2003", "represented_by": "ALLEN T.", "respondent": "GBR", "articles": "10;10-1;10-2", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Appleby and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 44306\/98, \u00a7 48, ECHR 2003-VI;Bladet Troms\u00f8 and Stensaas v. Norway [GC], no. 21980\/93, \u00a7\u00a7 61-64 ECHR 1999-III;Bowman v. the United Kingdom, 19 February 1998, \u00a7 41, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-I;Carson and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 42184\/05, ECHR 2010;Centro Europa 7 S.R.L. and Di Stefano v. Italy [GC], no. 38433\/09, ECHR 2012;Dickson v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 44362\/04, ECHR 2007-V;Editions Plon v. France, no. 58148\/00, \u00a7 43, ECHR 2004-IV;Evans v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 6339\/05, ECHR 2007-I;Fressoz and Roire v. France [GC], no. 29183\/95, \u00a7 45, ECHR 1999-I;Handyside v. the United Kingdom, 7 December 1976, \u00a7 49, Series A no. 24;Hatton and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 36022\/97, ECHR 2003-VIII;Hirst v. the United Kingdom (no. 2) [GC], no. 74025\/01, ECHR 2005-IX;Informationsverein Lentia and Others v. Austria, 24 November 1993, \u00a7 38, Series A no. 276;James and Others v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1986, Series A no. 98;Jersild v. Denmark, 23 September 1994, \u00a7 31, Series A no. 298;Manole and Others v. Moldova, no. 13936\/02, \u00a7 99, ECHR 2009 (extracts);Mellacher and Others v. Austria, 19 December 1989, Series A no. 169;Mouvement ra\u00eblien suisse v. Switzerland [GC], no. 16354\/06, 13 July 2012;Murphy v. Ireland, no. 44179\/98, ECHR 2003 IX (extracts);Observer and Guardian v. the United Kingdom, 26 November 1991, \u00a7 60, Series A no. 216;Pretty v. the United Kingdom, no. 2346\/02, ECHR 2002-III;Runkee and White v. the United Kingdom, nos. 42949\/98 and 53134\/99, 10 May 2007;Schweizerische Radio- und Fernsehgesellschaft SRG v. Switzerland, no. 34124\/06, \u00a7 56, 21 June 2012;Scoppola v. Italy (no. 3) [GC], no. 126\/05, 22 May 2012;Soci\u00e9t\u00e9 de conception de presse et d\u2019\u00e9dition and Ponson v. France, no. 26935\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 57 and 63, 5 March 2009;Stec and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 65731\/01, ECHR 2006-VI;Stoll v. Switzerland [GC], no. 69698\/01, \u00a7 101, ECHR 2007-V;TV Vest AS and Rogaland Pensjonistparti v. Norway, no. 21132\/05, ECHR 2008 (extracts);VgT Verein gegen Tierfabriken v. Switzerland, no. 24699\/94, ECHR 2001-VI;Vides Aizsardzibas Klubs v. Latvia, no. 57829\/00, \u00a7 42, 27 May 2004;Wingrove v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 25 November 1996, Reports of Decisions and Judgments 1996-V, \u00a7 58;\u017ddanoka v. Latvia [GC], no. 58278\/00, ECHR 2006-IV", "external_sources": "Chapter 13 of the Fifth Report to the Government of the Committee on Standards in Public Life (\u201cthe Neill Committee\u201d);The European Platform of Regulatory Authorities (\u201cEPRA\u201d) Survey of 2006;Recommendation R(1999)15 of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on measures concerning media coverage of election campaigns", "conclusion": "No violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression -{General} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Andr\u00e1s Saj\u00f3;Dean Spielmann;Elisabeth Steiner;Fran\u00e7oise Tulkens;George Nicolaou;Helen Keller;Ineta Ziemele;Josep Casadevall;Julia Laffranque;Kristina Pardalos;Mihai Poalelungi;Neboj\u0161a Vu\u010dini\u0107;Nicolas Bratza;P\u00e4ivi Hirvel\u00e4;Vincent A. De Gaetano;Zdravka Kalaydjieva", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0422JUD004887608" }, "461": { "webcast_id": "4887608_07032012", "hearing_date": "2012-03-07 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Animal Defenders International c. United Kingdom (no. 48876\/08)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "48876\/08", "case_id": "001-111190", "case_name": "ANIMAL DEFENDERS INTERNATIONAL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-111190", "type": "COMMUNICATEDCASES", "typedescription": 23, "document_date": "2011-01-18 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "", "issue": "", "represented_by": "BINDMANS LLP", "respondent": "GBR", "articles": "10", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Communicated", "separate_opinion": "FALSE", "judges": "", "ecli": "" }, "462": { "webcast_id": "4337004_25012012", "hearing_date": "2012-01-25 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Catan and Others v. Republic of Moldova and Russia (no. 43370\/04, 43370\/04, 8252\/05 and 18454\/06)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "43370\/04", "case_id": "001-114082", "case_name": "CASE OF CATAN AND OTHERS v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-114082", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2012-10-19 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Article 6 of the Moldavian Republic of Transdniestria Law on languages", "represented_by": "POSTICA A. ; MANOLE I. ; HUGHES P. ; DUFFY H.", "respondent": "MDA;RUS", "articles": "1;35;41;P1-2", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Al-Adsani v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 35763\/97, \u00a7 55, ECHR 2001-XI;Al-Skeini and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 55721\/07, 7 July 2011;Artico v. Italy, 13 May 1980, \u00a7 33, Series A no. 37;Assanidze v. Georgia [GC], no. 71503\/01, \u00a7 139, ECHR 2004-II;Austin and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 39692\/09, 40713\/09 and 41008\/09, \u00a7 54, 15 March 2012;Bankovic and Others v. Belgium and 16 Other Contracting States [GC] (dec.), no. 52207\/99, ECHR 2001- XII;Case \u201crelating to certain aspects of the laws on the use of languages in education in Belgium\u201d, judgment of 23 July 1968, Series A no. 6, \u00a7\u00a7 3-5;Catan and Others v. Moldova and Russia (dec.), nos. 43370\/04, 8252\/05 and 18454\/06, \u00a7 108, 15 June 2010;Cyprus v. Turkey [GC], no. 25781\/94, ECHR 2001-IV;Demir and Baykara v. Turkey [GC], no. 34503\/97, \u00a7 67, ECHR 2008;Folger\u00f8 and Others v. Norway [GC], no. 15472\/02, \u00a7 84, ECHR 2007-III;Ilascu and Others v. Moldova and Russia [GC], no. 48787\/99, ECHR 2004-VII;Ivantoc and Others v. Moldova and Russia, no. 23687\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 105-111, 15 November 2011;Kjeldsen, Busk Madsen and Pedersen v. Denmark, judgment of 7 December 1976, Series A no. 23;Lautsi and Others v. Italy [GC], no. 30814\/06, ECHR 2011 (extracts);Leyla Sahin v. Turkey [GC], no. 44774\/98, \u00a7\u00a7 134 and 136, ECHR 2005-XI;Loizidou v. Turkey (merits), 18 December 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-VI;Loizidou v. Turkey (preliminary objections), 23 March 1995, \u00a7 62, Series A no. 310;Podkolzina v. Latvia, no. 46726\/99, \u00a7 36, ECHR 2002-II;Ponomaryovi v. Bulgaria, no. 5335\/05, \u00a7 56, ECHR 2011;Rantsev v. Cyprus and Russia, no. 25965\/04, \u00a7\u00a7 273-274, ECHR 2010 (extracts);Saadi v. Italy [GC], no. 37201\/06, \u00a7 128, ECHR 2008;Saadi v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 13229\/03, \u00a7 62, ECHR 2008-...;Sampanis and Others v. Greece, no. 32526\/05, 5 June 2008;Soering v. the United Kingdom, 7 July 1989, \u00a7 86, Series A no. 161;Stec and Others v. the United Kingdom (dec.) [GC], nos. 65731\/01 and 65900\/01, \u00a7 48, ECHR 2005-X;Timishev v. Russia, nos. 55762\/00 and 55974\/00, \u00a7 64, ECHR 2005-XI", "external_sources": "Annual Report for 2004 of the Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe;Universal Declaration of Human Rights;Convention against Discrimination in Education;International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights;International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination;Convention on the Rights of the Child", "conclusion": "Preliminary objection dismissed;Remainder inadmissible;No violation of Article 2 of Protocol No. 1 - Right to education-{general} (Article 2 of Protocol No. 1 - Right to education) (the Republic of Moldova);Violation of Article 2 of Protocol No. 1 - Right to education-{general} (Article 2 of Protocol No. 1 - Respect for parents' philosophical convictions;Right to education) (Russia);Non-pecuniary damage - award", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Anatoly Kovler;David Th\u00f3r Bj\u00f6rgvinsson;Dean Spielmann;Egbert Myjer;Fran\u00e7oise Tulkens;Helen Keller;Isabelle Berro-Lef\u00e8vre;J\u00e1n \u0160ikuta;Josep Casadevall;Karel Jungwiert;Lech Garlicki;Ledi Bianku;Mark Villiger;Mihai Poalelungi;Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska;Nicolas Bratza", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1019JUD004337004" }, "463": { "webcast_id": "4337004_25012012", "hearing_date": "2012-01-25 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Catan and Others v. Republic of Moldova and Russia (no. 43370\/04, 43370\/04, 8252\/05 and 18454\/06)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "43370\/04", "case_id": "001-99961", "case_name": "CATAN AND OTHERS v. MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-99961", "type": "DECISIONS", "typedescription": 8, "document_date": "", "collection": "CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "7", "issue": "", "represented_by": "MANOLE I., lawyer, Chisinau ; POSTICA, A , lawyer, Chisinau ; UNGER, A., Professor of law, London South Bank University", "respondent": "MDA;RUS", "articles": "3;8;14+8;14;P1-2", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Partly admissible;Partly inadmissible", "separate_opinion": "", "judges": "Anatoly Kovler;David Th\u00f3r Bj\u00f6rgvinsson;J\u00e1n \u0160ikuta;Lech Garlicki;Mihai Poalelungi;Nicolas Bratza", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0615DEC004337004" }, "464": { "webcast_id": "4337004_25012012", "hearing_date": "2012-01-25 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Catan and Others v. Republic of Moldova and Russia (no. 43370\/04, 43370\/04, 8252\/05 and 18454\/06)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "43370\/04", "case_id": "001-114082", "case_name": "CASE OF CATAN AND OTHERS v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-114082", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2012-10-19 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Article 6 of the Moldavian Republic of Transdniestria Law on languages", "represented_by": "POSTICA A. ; MANOLE I. ; HUGHES P. ; DUFFY H.", "respondent": "MDA;RUS", "articles": "1;35;41;P1-2", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Al-Adsani v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 35763\/97, \u00a7 55, ECHR 2001-XI;Al-Skeini and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 55721\/07, 7 July 2011;Artico v. Italy, 13 May 1980, \u00a7 33, Series A no. 37;Assanidze v. Georgia [GC], no. 71503\/01, \u00a7 139, ECHR 2004-II;Austin and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 39692\/09, 40713\/09 and 41008\/09, \u00a7 54, 15 March 2012;Bankovic and Others v. Belgium and 16 Other Contracting States [GC] (dec.), no. 52207\/99, ECHR 2001- XII;Case \u201crelating to certain aspects of the laws on the use of languages in education in Belgium\u201d, judgment of 23 July 1968, Series A no. 6, \u00a7\u00a7 3-5;Catan and Others v. Moldova and Russia (dec.), nos. 43370\/04, 8252\/05 and 18454\/06, \u00a7 108, 15 June 2010;Cyprus v. Turkey [GC], no. 25781\/94, ECHR 2001-IV;Demir and Baykara v. Turkey [GC], no. 34503\/97, \u00a7 67, ECHR 2008;Folger\u00f8 and Others v. Norway [GC], no. 15472\/02, \u00a7 84, ECHR 2007-III;Ilascu and Others v. Moldova and Russia [GC], no. 48787\/99, ECHR 2004-VII;Ivantoc and Others v. Moldova and Russia, no. 23687\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 105-111, 15 November 2011;Kjeldsen, Busk Madsen and Pedersen v. Denmark, judgment of 7 December 1976, Series A no. 23;Lautsi and Others v. Italy [GC], no. 30814\/06, ECHR 2011 (extracts);Leyla Sahin v. Turkey [GC], no. 44774\/98, \u00a7\u00a7 134 and 136, ECHR 2005-XI;Loizidou v. Turkey (merits), 18 December 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-VI;Loizidou v. Turkey (preliminary objections), 23 March 1995, \u00a7 62, Series A no. 310;Podkolzina v. Latvia, no. 46726\/99, \u00a7 36, ECHR 2002-II;Ponomaryovi v. Bulgaria, no. 5335\/05, \u00a7 56, ECHR 2011;Rantsev v. Cyprus and Russia, no. 25965\/04, \u00a7\u00a7 273-274, ECHR 2010 (extracts);Saadi v. Italy [GC], no. 37201\/06, \u00a7 128, ECHR 2008;Saadi v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 13229\/03, \u00a7 62, ECHR 2008-...;Sampanis and Others v. Greece, no. 32526\/05, 5 June 2008;Soering v. the United Kingdom, 7 July 1989, \u00a7 86, Series A no. 161;Stec and Others v. the United Kingdom (dec.) [GC], nos. 65731\/01 and 65900\/01, \u00a7 48, ECHR 2005-X;Timishev v. Russia, nos. 55762\/00 and 55974\/00, \u00a7 64, ECHR 2005-XI", "external_sources": "Annual Report for 2004 of the Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe;Universal Declaration of Human Rights;Convention against Discrimination in Education;International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights;International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination;Convention on the Rights of the Child", "conclusion": "Preliminary objection dismissed;Remainder inadmissible;No violation of Article 2 of Protocol No. 1 - Right to education-{general} (Article 2 of Protocol No. 1 - Right to education) (the Republic of Moldova);Violation of Article 2 of Protocol No. 1 - Right to education-{general} (Article 2 of Protocol No. 1 - Respect for parents' philosophical convictions;Right to education) (Russia);Non-pecuniary damage - award", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Anatoly Kovler;David Th\u00f3r Bj\u00f6rgvinsson;Dean Spielmann;Egbert Myjer;Fran\u00e7oise Tulkens;Helen Keller;Isabelle Berro-Lef\u00e8vre;J\u00e1n \u0160ikuta;Josep Casadevall;Karel Jungwiert;Lech Garlicki;Ledi Bianku;Mark Villiger;Mihai Poalelungi;Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska;Nicolas Bratza", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1019JUD004337004" }, "465": { "webcast_id": "4337004_25012012", "hearing_date": "2012-01-25 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Catan and Others v. Republic of Moldova and Russia (no. 43370\/04, 43370\/04, 8252\/05 and 18454\/06)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "43370\/04", "case_id": "001-99961", "case_name": "CATAN AND OTHERS v. MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-99961", "type": "DECISIONS", "typedescription": 8, "document_date": "", "collection": "CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "7", "issue": "", "represented_by": "MANOLE I., lawyer, Chisinau ; POSTICA, A , lawyer, Chisinau ; UNGER, A., Professor of law, London South Bank University", "respondent": "MDA;RUS", "articles": "3;8;14+8;14;P1-2", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Partly admissible;Partly inadmissible", "separate_opinion": "", "judges": "Anatoly Kovler;David Th\u00f3r Bj\u00f6rgvinsson;J\u00e1n \u0160ikuta;Lech Garlicki;Mihai Poalelungi;Nicolas Bratza", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0615DEC004337004" }, "466": { "webcast_id": "4337004_25012012", "hearing_date": "2012-01-25 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Catan and Others v. Republic of Moldova and Russia (no. 43370\/04, 43370\/04, 8252\/05 and 18454\/06)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "8252\/05", "case_id": "001-114082", "case_name": "CASE OF CATAN AND OTHERS v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-114082", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2012-10-19 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Article 6 of the Moldavian Republic of Transdniestria Law on languages", "represented_by": "POSTICA A. ; MANOLE I. ; HUGHES P. ; DUFFY H.", "respondent": "MDA;RUS", "articles": "1;35;41;P1-2", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Al-Adsani v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 35763\/97, \u00a7 55, ECHR 2001-XI;Al-Skeini and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 55721\/07, 7 July 2011;Artico v. Italy, 13 May 1980, \u00a7 33, Series A no. 37;Assanidze v. Georgia [GC], no. 71503\/01, \u00a7 139, ECHR 2004-II;Austin and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 39692\/09, 40713\/09 and 41008\/09, \u00a7 54, 15 March 2012;Bankovic and Others v. Belgium and 16 Other Contracting States [GC] (dec.), no. 52207\/99, ECHR 2001- XII;Case \u201crelating to certain aspects of the laws on the use of languages in education in Belgium\u201d, judgment of 23 July 1968, Series A no. 6, \u00a7\u00a7 3-5;Catan and Others v. Moldova and Russia (dec.), nos. 43370\/04, 8252\/05 and 18454\/06, \u00a7 108, 15 June 2010;Cyprus v. Turkey [GC], no. 25781\/94, ECHR 2001-IV;Demir and Baykara v. Turkey [GC], no. 34503\/97, \u00a7 67, ECHR 2008;Folger\u00f8 and Others v. Norway [GC], no. 15472\/02, \u00a7 84, ECHR 2007-III;Ilascu and Others v. Moldova and Russia [GC], no. 48787\/99, ECHR 2004-VII;Ivantoc and Others v. Moldova and Russia, no. 23687\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 105-111, 15 November 2011;Kjeldsen, Busk Madsen and Pedersen v. Denmark, judgment of 7 December 1976, Series A no. 23;Lautsi and Others v. Italy [GC], no. 30814\/06, ECHR 2011 (extracts);Leyla Sahin v. Turkey [GC], no. 44774\/98, \u00a7\u00a7 134 and 136, ECHR 2005-XI;Loizidou v. Turkey (merits), 18 December 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-VI;Loizidou v. Turkey (preliminary objections), 23 March 1995, \u00a7 62, Series A no. 310;Podkolzina v. Latvia, no. 46726\/99, \u00a7 36, ECHR 2002-II;Ponomaryovi v. Bulgaria, no. 5335\/05, \u00a7 56, ECHR 2011;Rantsev v. Cyprus and Russia, no. 25965\/04, \u00a7\u00a7 273-274, ECHR 2010 (extracts);Saadi v. Italy [GC], no. 37201\/06, \u00a7 128, ECHR 2008;Saadi v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 13229\/03, \u00a7 62, ECHR 2008-...;Sampanis and Others v. Greece, no. 32526\/05, 5 June 2008;Soering v. the United Kingdom, 7 July 1989, \u00a7 86, Series A no. 161;Stec and Others v. the United Kingdom (dec.) [GC], nos. 65731\/01 and 65900\/01, \u00a7 48, ECHR 2005-X;Timishev v. Russia, nos. 55762\/00 and 55974\/00, \u00a7 64, ECHR 2005-XI", "external_sources": "Annual Report for 2004 of the Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe;Universal Declaration of Human Rights;Convention against Discrimination in Education;International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights;International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination;Convention on the Rights of the Child", "conclusion": "Preliminary objection dismissed;Remainder inadmissible;No violation of Article 2 of Protocol No. 1 - Right to education-{general} (Article 2 of Protocol No. 1 - Right to education) (the Republic of Moldova);Violation of Article 2 of Protocol No. 1 - Right to education-{general} (Article 2 of Protocol No. 1 - Respect for parents' philosophical convictions;Right to education) (Russia);Non-pecuniary damage - award", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Anatoly Kovler;David Th\u00f3r Bj\u00f6rgvinsson;Dean Spielmann;Egbert Myjer;Fran\u00e7oise Tulkens;Helen Keller;Isabelle Berro-Lef\u00e8vre;J\u00e1n \u0160ikuta;Josep Casadevall;Karel Jungwiert;Lech Garlicki;Ledi Bianku;Mark Villiger;Mihai Poalelungi;Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska;Nicolas Bratza", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1019JUD004337004" }, "467": { "webcast_id": "4337004_25012012", "hearing_date": "2012-01-25 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Catan and Others v. Republic of Moldova and Russia (no. 43370\/04, 43370\/04, 8252\/05 and 18454\/06)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "8252\/05", "case_id": "001-99961", "case_name": "CATAN AND OTHERS v. MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-99961", "type": "DECISIONS", "typedescription": 8, "document_date": "", "collection": "CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "7", "issue": "", "represented_by": "MANOLE I., lawyer, Chisinau ; POSTICA, A , lawyer, Chisinau ; UNGER, A., Professor of law, London South Bank University", "respondent": "MDA;RUS", "articles": "3;8;14+8;14;P1-2", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Partly admissible;Partly inadmissible", "separate_opinion": "", "judges": "Anatoly Kovler;David Th\u00f3r Bj\u00f6rgvinsson;J\u00e1n \u0160ikuta;Lech Garlicki;Mihai Poalelungi;Nicolas Bratza", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0615DEC004337004" }, "468": { "webcast_id": "4337004_25012012", "hearing_date": "2012-01-25 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Catan and Others v. Republic of Moldova and Russia (no. 43370\/04, 43370\/04, 8252\/05 and 18454\/06)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "18454\/06", "case_id": "001-114082", "case_name": "CASE OF CATAN AND OTHERS v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-114082", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2012-10-19 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Article 6 of the Moldavian Republic of Transdniestria Law on languages", "represented_by": "POSTICA A. ; MANOLE I. ; HUGHES P. ; DUFFY H.", "respondent": "MDA;RUS", "articles": "1;35;41;P1-2", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Al-Adsani v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 35763\/97, \u00a7 55, ECHR 2001-XI;Al-Skeini and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 55721\/07, 7 July 2011;Artico v. Italy, 13 May 1980, \u00a7 33, Series A no. 37;Assanidze v. Georgia [GC], no. 71503\/01, \u00a7 139, ECHR 2004-II;Austin and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 39692\/09, 40713\/09 and 41008\/09, \u00a7 54, 15 March 2012;Bankovic and Others v. Belgium and 16 Other Contracting States [GC] (dec.), no. 52207\/99, ECHR 2001- XII;Case \u201crelating to certain aspects of the laws on the use of languages in education in Belgium\u201d, judgment of 23 July 1968, Series A no. 6, \u00a7\u00a7 3-5;Catan and Others v. Moldova and Russia (dec.), nos. 43370\/04, 8252\/05 and 18454\/06, \u00a7 108, 15 June 2010;Cyprus v. Turkey [GC], no. 25781\/94, ECHR 2001-IV;Demir and Baykara v. Turkey [GC], no. 34503\/97, \u00a7 67, ECHR 2008;Folger\u00f8 and Others v. Norway [GC], no. 15472\/02, \u00a7 84, ECHR 2007-III;Ilascu and Others v. Moldova and Russia [GC], no. 48787\/99, ECHR 2004-VII;Ivantoc and Others v. Moldova and Russia, no. 23687\/05, \u00a7\u00a7 105-111, 15 November 2011;Kjeldsen, Busk Madsen and Pedersen v. Denmark, judgment of 7 December 1976, Series A no. 23;Lautsi and Others v. Italy [GC], no. 30814\/06, ECHR 2011 (extracts);Leyla Sahin v. Turkey [GC], no. 44774\/98, \u00a7\u00a7 134 and 136, ECHR 2005-XI;Loizidou v. Turkey (merits), 18 December 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-VI;Loizidou v. Turkey (preliminary objections), 23 March 1995, \u00a7 62, Series A no. 310;Podkolzina v. Latvia, no. 46726\/99, \u00a7 36, ECHR 2002-II;Ponomaryovi v. Bulgaria, no. 5335\/05, \u00a7 56, ECHR 2011;Rantsev v. Cyprus and Russia, no. 25965\/04, \u00a7\u00a7 273-274, ECHR 2010 (extracts);Saadi v. Italy [GC], no. 37201\/06, \u00a7 128, ECHR 2008;Saadi v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 13229\/03, \u00a7 62, ECHR 2008-...;Sampanis and Others v. Greece, no. 32526\/05, 5 June 2008;Soering v. the United Kingdom, 7 July 1989, \u00a7 86, Series A no. 161;Stec and Others v. the United Kingdom (dec.) [GC], nos. 65731\/01 and 65900\/01, \u00a7 48, ECHR 2005-X;Timishev v. Russia, nos. 55762\/00 and 55974\/00, \u00a7 64, ECHR 2005-XI", "external_sources": "Annual Report for 2004 of the Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe;Universal Declaration of Human Rights;Convention against Discrimination in Education;International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights;International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination;Convention on the Rights of the Child", "conclusion": "Preliminary objection dismissed;Remainder inadmissible;No violation of Article 2 of Protocol No. 1 - Right to education-{general} (Article 2 of Protocol No. 1 - Right to education) (the Republic of Moldova);Violation of Article 2 of Protocol No. 1 - Right to education-{general} (Article 2 of Protocol No. 1 - Respect for parents' philosophical convictions;Right to education) (Russia);Non-pecuniary damage - award", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Anatoly Kovler;David Th\u00f3r Bj\u00f6rgvinsson;Dean Spielmann;Egbert Myjer;Fran\u00e7oise Tulkens;Helen Keller;Isabelle Berro-Lef\u00e8vre;J\u00e1n \u0160ikuta;Josep Casadevall;Karel Jungwiert;Lech Garlicki;Ledi Bianku;Mark Villiger;Mihai Poalelungi;Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska;Nicolas Bratza", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1019JUD004337004" }, "469": { "webcast_id": "4337004_25012012", "hearing_date": "2012-01-25 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Catan and Others v. Republic of Moldova and Russia (no. 43370\/04, 43370\/04, 8252\/05 and 18454\/06)", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "18454\/06", "case_id": "001-99961", "case_name": "CATAN AND OTHERS v. MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-99961", "type": "DECISIONS", "typedescription": 8, "document_date": "", "collection": "CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG", "importance": 4, "court": "7", "issue": "", "represented_by": "MANOLE I., lawyer, Chisinau ; POSTICA, A , lawyer, Chisinau ; UNGER, A., Professor of law, London South Bank University", "respondent": "MDA;RUS", "articles": "3;8;14+8;14;P1-2", "strasbourg_caselaw": "", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Partly admissible;Partly inadmissible", "separate_opinion": "", "judges": "Anatoly Kovler;David Th\u00f3r Bj\u00f6rgvinsson;J\u00e1n \u0160ikuta;Lech Garlicki;Mihai Poalelungi;Nicolas Bratza", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0615DEC004337004" }, "470": { "webcast_id": "7124301_11012012", "hearing_date": "2012-01-11 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Visti\u014b\u0161 and Perepjolkins v. Latvia (no. 71243\/01) Article 41 - Just satisfaction", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "71243\/01", "case_id": "001-142270", "case_name": "CASE OF VISTI\u0145\u0160 AND PEREPJOLKINS v. LATVIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-142270", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 12, "document_date": "2014-03-25 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 1, "court": "8", "issue": "Articles 1757, 1765 and 1763 of the Civil Code", "represented_by": "RADZINS E.", "respondent": "LVA", "articles": "41", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Andrejeva v. Latvia [GC], no. 55707\/00, \u00a7 115, ECHR 2009;Former King of Greece and Others v. Greece [GC] (just satisfaction), no. 25701\/94, \u00a7\u00a7 78-79, 28 November 2002;Guiso-Gallisay v. Italy (just satisfaction) [GC], no. 58858\/00, 22 December 2009;Iatridis v. Greece (just satisfaction) [GC], no. 31107\/96, \u00a7 32, ECHR 2000 XI;Medici and Others v. Italy (just satisfaction), no. 70508\/01, \u00a7 13, 4 December 2012;Scordino v. Italy (no. 1) [GC], no. 36813\/97, \u00a7 258, ECHR 2006 V", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage)", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Andr\u00e1s Saj\u00f3;Andr\u00e9 Potocki;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Dean Spielmann;Elisabeth Steiner;Fran\u00e7oise Tulkens;J\u00e1n \u0160ikuta;Julia Laffranque;Karel Jungwiert;Kristina Pardalos;Lech Garlicki;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Nicolas Bratza;Nona Tsotsoria;Peer Lorenzen", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0325JUD007124301" }, "471": { "webcast_id": "7124301_11012012", "hearing_date": "2012-01-11 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Visti\u014b\u0161 and Perepjolkins v. Latvia (no. 71243\/01) Article 41 - Just satisfaction", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "71243\/01", "case_id": "001-114277", "case_name": "CASE OF VISTI\u0145\u0160 AND PEREPJOLKINS v. LATVIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-114277", "type": "GRANDCHAMBER", "typedescription": 14, "document_date": "2012-10-25 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 2, "court": "8", "issue": "Law of 30 October 1997 on expropriation for the needs of the State of land within the Free Commercial Port of Riga ; Law of 1923 on the expropriation of real estate in the public interest ; Law of 14 October 2010 on the expropriation of real estate in the public interest ; Article 105 of the Constitution ; Article 2 of the Supreme Council\u2019s decision of 15 September 1992 on the conditions of the entry into force of the 1923 General Expropriation Act ; Law of 19 December 1996 ; Regulation no. 273 of 5 August 1997 ; Articles 1415 and 1439 of the Civil Code ; Law on denationalisation or land and real-estate reform ; Free Commercial Port of Riga Act of 6 November 1996", "represented_by": "RADZINS E.", "respondent": "LVA", "articles": "35;35-3-b;41;P1-1;P1-1-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Althoff and Others v. Germany, no. 5631\/05, 8 December 2011;Beyeler v. Italy [GC], no. 33202\/96, \u00a7 112, ECHR 2000-I;Bistrovic v. Croatia, no. 25774\/05, \u00a7 35, 31 May 2007;Broniowski v. Poland [GC], no. 31443\/96, ECHR 2004-V;Centro Europa 7 S.r.1. and Di Stefano v. Italy [GC], no. 38433\/09, \u00a7 143, 7 June 2012;Chassagnou and Others v. France [GC], nos. 25088\/94, 28331\/95 and 28443\/95, ECHR 1999-III;Church of Scientology Moscow v. Russia, no. 18147\/02, \u00a7 101, 5 April 2007;Efstathiou and Michailidis & Co. Motel Amerika v. Greece, no. 55794\/00, ECHR 2003-IX;Fener Rum Erkek Lisesi Vakfi v. Turkey, no. 34478\/97, \u00a7 46, 9 January 2007;Former King of Greece and Others v. Greece [GC] (just satisfaction), no. 25701\/94, 28 November 2002;Former King of Greece and Others v. Greece [GC] (merits), no. 25701\/94, ECHR 2000-XII;Gorraiz Lizarraga and Others v. Spain, no. 62543\/00, ECHR 2004-III;Guiso-Gallisay v. Italy (just satisfaction) [GC], no. 58858\/00, 22 December 2009;Guiso-Gallisay v. Italy, no. 58858\/00, \u00a7\u00a7 82-83, 8 December 2005;Herrmann v. Germany [GC], no. 9300\/07, \u00a7 74, 26 June 2012;Jahn and Others v. Germany ([GC], nos. 46720\/99, 72203\/01 and 72552\/01, ECHR 2005-VI;James and Others v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1986, Series A no. 98;Kopeck\u00fd v. Slovakia [GC], no. 44912\/98, ECHR 2004-IX;Kozacioglu v. Turkey [GC], no. 2334\/03, \u00a7 48, 19 February 2009;Kozlova and Smirnova v. Latvia (dec.), no. 57381\/00, ECHR 2001-XI;Liepajnieks v. Latvia (dec.), no. 37586\/06, \u00a7 49, 2 November 2010;Maltzan and Others v. Germany (dec.) [GC], nos. 71916\/01, 71917\/01 and 10260\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 77 and 111-112, ECHR 2005-V;N.A. and Others v. Turkey, no. 37451\/97, \u00a7 39, ECHR 2005-X;Papachelas v. Greece [GC], no. 31423\/96, \u00a7 48, ECHR 1999-II;Ruiz-Mateos v. Spain, 23 June 1993, Series A no. 262;Sanoma Uitgevers B.V. v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 38224\/03, \u00a7 88, 14 September 2010;Scordino v. Italy (no. 1) [GC], no. 36813\/97, ECHR 2006-V;\u0160pacek, s.r.o., v. the Czech Republic, no. 26449\/95, \u00a7 54, 9 November 1999;Stec and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 65731\/01, \u00a7 52, ECHR 2006-VI;Stran Greek Refineries and Stratis Andreadis v. Greece, 9 December 1994, Series A no. 301-B;Sud Fondi S.r.l. and Others v. Italy, no. 75909\/01, \u00a7 109, 20 January 2009;Suljagic v. Bosnia and Herzegovina, no. 27912\/02, \u00a7 42, 3 November 2009;The Holy Monasteries v. Greece, 9 December 1994, Series A no. 301-A;Tkachevy v. Russia, no. 35430\/05, \u00a7 50, 14 February 2012;Urb\u00e1rska Obec Trencianske Biskupice v. Slovakia, no. 74258\/01, 27 November 2007;Velikovi and Others v. Bulgaria, nos. 43278\/98, 45437\/99, 48014\/99, 48380\/99, 51362\/99, 53367\/99, 60036\/00, 73465\/01 and 194\/02, \u00a7 166, 15 March 2007;\u017ddanoka v. Latvia [GC], no. 58278\/00, \u00a7\u00a7 18-27, ECHR 2006-IV", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "Preliminary objection dismissed (Article 35-3-b - No significant disadvantage);Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Deprivation of property);Just satisfaction reserved", "separate_opinion": "TRUE", "judges": "Alvina Gyulumyan;Andr\u00e1s Saj\u00f3;Andr\u00e9 Potocki;Angelika Nu\u00dfberger;Corneliu B\u00eersan;Dean Spielmann;Egbert Myjer;Elisabeth Steiner;Fran\u00e7oise Tulkens;Ineta Ziemele;J\u00e1n \u0160ikuta;Josep Casadevall;Julia Laffranque;Karel Jungwiert;Kristina Pardalos;Lech Garlicki;Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos;Luis L\u00f3pez Guerra;Nicolas Bratza;Nona Tsotsoria;Peer Lorenzen", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1025JUD007124301" }, "472": { "webcast_id": "7124301_11012012", "hearing_date": "2012-01-11 00:00:00", "hearing_title": "Visti\u014b\u0161 and Perepjolkins v. Latvia (no. 71243\/01) Article 41 - Just satisfaction", "hearing_type": "Grand Chamber hearing", "appno": "71243\/01", "case_id": "001-103866", "case_name": "CASE OF VISTI\u0145\u0160 AND PEREPJOLKINS v. LATVIA", "case_url": "https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-103866", "type": "CHAMBER", "typedescription": 15, "document_date": "2011-03-08 00:00:00", "collection": "CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG", "importance": 3, "court": "6", "issue": "", "represented_by": "RADZINS E.", "respondent": "LVA", "articles": "14;14+P1-1;P1-1;P1-1-1", "strasbourg_caselaw": "Beyeler v. Italy [GC], no 33202\/96, \u00a7 112, ECHR 2000-I;Bistrovic v. Croatia, no 25774\/05, \u00a7 35, 31 May 2007;Broniowski v. Poland [GC], no 31443\/96, \u00a7 182, ECHR 2004-V;Chassagnou and Others v. France [GC], nos. 25088\/94, 28331\/95 and 28443\/95, \u00a7 75, ECHR 1999-III;Efstathiou and Micha\u00eflidis & Cie Motel Amerika v. Greece, no 55794\/00, \u00a7 29, ECHR 2003-IX;Ex-roi de Greece and Others v. Greece (fond) [GC], no 25701\/94, ECHR 2000-XII);Ex-roi de Greece and Others c. Greece (just satisfaction) [GC], no 25701\/94, \u00a7 78, 28 November 2002;Fener Rum Erkek Lisesi Vakfi v. Turkey, no 34478\/97, \u00a7 46, ECHR 2007-... (extracts);Guiso-Gallisay v. Italy, no 58858\/00, \u00a7\u00a7 82-83, 8 December 2005;Hatton and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 36022\/97, ECHR 2003-VIII;Jahn and Others v. Germany [GC], nos. 46720\/99, 72203\/01 and 72552\/01, ECHR 2005-VI;James and Others v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1986, Series A no 98;Jantner v. Slovakia, no 39050\/97, \u00a7 34, 4 March 2003;Kopeck\u00fd v. Slovakia [GC], no 44912\/98, \u00a7 35, ECHR 2004-IX;Kozacioglu c. Turkey [GC], no 2334\/03, \u00a7 48, ECHR 2009-...;Malama v. Greece, no 43622\/98, \u00a7 51, ECHR 2001-II;N.A. and Others c. Turkey, no 37451\/97, \u00a7 39, ECHR 2005-X;Scordino c. Italy (no 1) [GC], no 36813\/97, ECHR 2006-V;Serife Yigit v. Turkey [GC], no 3976\/05, \u00a7 67, ECHR 2010-...;\u0160pacek, s.r.o., v. the Czech Republic, no 26449\/95, \u00a7 54, 9 November 1999;Sud Fondi S.r.l. and Others v. Italy, no 75909\/01, \u00a7 109, 20 January 2009;Suljagic v. Bosnia and Herzegovina, no 27912\/02, \u00a7 42, 3 November 2009;Urb\u00e1rska Obec Trencianske Biskupice v. Slovakia, no 74258\/01, \u00a7\u00a7 123-124, ECHR 2007-XIII (extracts);Velikovi and Others v. Bulgaria, nos. 43278\/98, 45437\/99, 48014\/99, 48380\/99, 51362\/99, 53367\/99, 60036\/00, 73465\/01 and 194\/02, \u00a7 166, 15 March 2007;Von Maltzan and Others v. Germany (dec.) [GC], nos. 71916\/01, 71917\/01 and 10260\/02, \u00a7\u00a7 77 and 111-112, ECHR 2005-V", "external_sources": "", "conclusion": "No violation of P1-1;No violation of Art. 14+P1-1", "separate_opinion": "FALSE", "judges": "Alvina Gyulumyan;Corneliu B\u00eersan;Egbert Myjer;Ineta Ziemele;Josep Casadevall;Lech Garlicki;Luis L\u00f3pez Guerra", "ecli": "ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0308JUD007124301" } }