Datasets:

amphora

/

finqa_suite

like 1

['what is the number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants and rights under equity compensation plans approved by security holders?', 'and what is the number of securities remaining available for future issuance under those equity compensation plans?', 'what is, then, the combined total of securities between those two numbers?', 'what is the number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans approved by security holders?', 'and how much does this number represent in relation to that combined total?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: equity compensation plan information the following table presents the equity securities available for issuance under our equity compensation plans as of december 31 , 2017 . equity compensation plan information plan category number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options , warrants and rights ( 1 ) weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options , warrants and rights number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) ( a ) ( b ) ( c ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders 448859 $ 0.00 4087587 equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 2 ) 2014 2014 2014 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>plan category</td><td>number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants and rights ( 1 ) ( a ) ( b )</td><td>weighted-average exercise price of outstanding optionswarrants and rights</td><td>number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securitiesreflected in column ( a ) ) ( c )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>equity compensation plans approved by security holders</td><td>448859</td><td>$ 0.00</td><td>4087587</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 2 )</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total</td><td>448859</td><td>$ 0.00</td><td>4087587</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) includes grants made under the huntington ingalls industries , inc . 2012 long-term incentive stock plan ( the "2012 plan" ) , which was approved by our stockholders on may 2 , 2012 , and the huntington ingalls industries , inc . 2011 long-term incentive stock plan ( the "2011 plan" ) , which was approved by the sole stockholder of hii prior to its spin-off from northrop grumman corporation . of these shares , 27123 were stock rights granted under the 2011 plan . in addition , this number includes 28763 stock rights , 3075 restricted stock rights , and 389898 restricted performance stock rights granted under the 2012 plan , assuming target performance achievement . ( 2 ) there are no awards made under plans not approved by security holders . item 13 . certain relationships and related transactions , and director independence information as to certain relationships and related transactions and director independence will be incorporated herein by reference to the proxy statement for our 2018 annual meeting of stockholders , to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company 2019s fiscal year . item 14 . principal accountant fees and services information as to principal accountant fees and services will be incorporated herein by reference to the proxy statement for our 2018 annual meeting of stockholders , to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company 2019s fiscal year. .

['448859.0', '4087587.0', '4536446.0', '4087587.0', '0.90105']

['what was the change in estimated future net amortization expense of present value of future profits between 2013 and 2014?', 'so what was the percentage change during this time?', 'what was the change in deferred policy acquisition costs and present value of future profits in 2010?', 'so what was the percentage change during this time?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: the hartford financial services group , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) 7 . deferred policy acquisition costs and present value of future profits ( continued ) results changes in the dac balance are as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance january 1</td><td>$ 9857</td><td>$ 10686</td><td>$ 13248</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>deferred costs</td><td>2608</td><td>2648</td><td>2853</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>amortization 2014 dac</td><td>-2920 ( 2920 )</td><td>-2665 ( 2665 )</td><td>-3247 ( 3247 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>amortization 2014 dac from discontinued operations</td><td>2014</td><td>-17 ( 17 )</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>amortization 2014 unlock benefit ( charge ) pre-tax [1]</td><td>-507 ( 507 )</td><td>138</td><td>-1010 ( 1010 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>adjustments to unrealized gains and losses on securities available-for-sale and other [2]</td><td>-377 ( 377 )</td><td>-1159 ( 1159 )</td><td>-1031 ( 1031 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>effect of currency translation</td><td>83</td><td>215</td><td>-39 ( 39 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>cumulative effect of accounting change pre-tax [3]</td><td>2014</td><td>11</td><td>-78 ( 78 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>balance december 31</td><td>$ 8744</td><td>$ 9857</td><td>$ 10686</td></tr></table> [1] the most significant contributors to the unlock charge recorded during the year ended december 31 , 2011 were assumption changes which reduced expected future gross profits including additional costs associated with implementing the japan hedging strategy and the u.s . variable annuity macro hedge program , as well as actual separate account returns below our aggregated estimated return . the most significant contributors to the unlock benefit recorded during the year ended december 31 , 2010 were actual separate account returns being above our aggregated estimated return . also included in the benefit are assumption updates related to benefits from withdrawals and lapses , offset by hedging , annuitization estimates on japan products , and long-term expected rate of return updates . the most significant contributors to the unlock charge recorded during the year ended december 31 , 2009 were the results of actual separate account returns being significantly below our aggregated estimated return for the first quarter of 2009 , partially offset by actual returns being greater than our aggregated estimated return for the period from april 1 , 2009 to december 31 , 2009 . [2] the most significant contributor to the adjustments was the effect of declining interest rates , resulting in unrealized gains on securities classified in aoci . other includes a $ 34 decrease as a result of the disposition of dac from the sale of the hartford investment canadian canada in 2010 . [3] for the year ended december 31 , 2010 the effect of adopting new accounting guidance for embedded credit derivatives resulted in a decrease to retained earnings and , as a result , a dac benefit . in addition , an offsetting amount was recorded in unrealized losses as unrealized losses decreased upon adoption of the new accounting guidance . for the year ended december 31 , 2009 the effect of adopting new accounting guidance for investments other- than- temporarily impaired resulted in an increase to retained earnings and , as a result , a dac charge . in addition , an offsetting amount was recorded in unrealized losses as unrealized losses increased upon adoption of the new accounting guidance . as of december 31 , 2011 , estimated future net amortization expense of present value of future profits for the succeeding five years is $ 39 , $ 58 , $ 24 , $ 23 and $ 22 in 2012 , 2013 , 2014 , 2015 and 2016 , respectively. .

['-34.0', '-0.58621', '-829.0', '-0.07758']

['what was the number of new stores in 2008 and 2012?', 'so what was the average during this time?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: the following table sets forth information concerning increases in the total number of our aap stores during the past five years: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>beginning stores</td><td>3460</td><td>3369</td><td>3264</td><td>3243</td><td>3153</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>new stores ( 1 )</td><td>116</td><td>95</td><td>110</td><td>75</td><td>109</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>stores closed</td><td>2014</td><td>-4 ( 4 )</td><td>-5 ( 5 )</td><td>-54 ( 54 )</td><td>-19 ( 19 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>ending stores</td><td>3576</td><td>3460</td><td>3369</td><td>3264</td><td>3243</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) does not include stores that opened as relocations of previously existing stores within the same general market area or substantial renovations of stores . store technology . our store-based information systems are comprised of a proprietary and integrated point of sale , electronic parts catalog , or epc , and store-level inventory management system ( collectively "store system" ) . information maintained by our store system is used to formulate pricing , marketing and merchandising strategies and to replenish inventory accurately and rapidly . our fully integrated system enables our store team members to assist our customers in their parts selection and ordering based on the year , make , model and engine type of their vehicles . our store system provides real-time inventory tracking at the store level allowing store team members to check the quantity of on-hand inventory for any sku , adjust stock levels for select items for store specific events , automatically process returns and defective merchandise , designate skus for cycle counts and track merchandise transfers . if a hard-to-find part or accessory is not available at one of our stores , the store system can determine whether the part is carried and in-stock through our hub or pdq ae networks or can be ordered directly from one of our vendors . available parts and accessories are then ordered electronically from another store , hub , pdq ae or directly from the vendor with immediate confirmation of price , availability and estimated delivery time . our centrally-based epc data management system enables us to reduce the time needed to ( i ) exchange data with our vendors and ( ii ) catalog and deliver updated , accurate parts information . we also support our store operations with additional proprietary systems and customer driven labor scheduling capabilities . all of these systems are tightly integrated and provide real-time , comprehensive information to store personnel , resulting in improved customer service levels , team member productivity and in-stock availability . we plan to start rolling out a new and enhanced epc in fiscal 2013 which is expected to simplify and improve the customer experience . among the improvements is a more efficient way to systematically identify add-on sales to ensure our customers have what they need to complete their automotive repair project . store support center merchandising . purchasing for virtually all of the merchandise for our stores is handled by our merchandise teams located in three primary locations : 2022 store support center in roanoke , virginia ; 2022 regional office in minneapolis , minnesota ; and 2022 global sourcing office in taipei , taiwan . our roanoke team is primarily responsible for the parts categories and our minnesota team is primarily responsible for accessories , oil and chemicals . our global sourcing team works closely with both teams . in fiscal 2012 , we purchased merchandise from approximately 450 vendors , with no single vendor accounting for more than 9% ( 9 % ) of purchases . our purchasing strategy involves negotiating agreements with most of our vendors to purchase merchandise over a specified period of time along with other terms , including pricing , payment terms and volume . the merchandising team has developed strong vendor relationships in the industry and , in a collaborative effort with our vendor partners , utilizes a category management process where we manage the mix of our product offerings to meet customer demand . we believe this process , which develops a customer-focused business plan for each merchandise category , and our global sourcing operation are critical to improving comparable store sales , gross margin and inventory productivity. .

['225.0', '112.5']

['what was the cash dividend paid per common stock share in 2006?', 'what is that divided by 100?', 'what were total dividends paid in 2006?', 'what is the total dividends paid over the quotient of dividends per share?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: page 31 of 94 other liquidity items cash payments required for long-term debt maturities , rental payments under noncancellable operating leases , purchase obligations and other commitments in effect at december 31 , 2007 , are summarized in the following table: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions )</td><td>payments due by period ( a ) total</td><td>payments due by period ( a ) less than 1 year</td><td>payments due by period ( a ) 1-3 years</td><td>payments due by period ( a ) 3-5 years</td><td>payments due by period ( a ) more than 5 years</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>long-term debt</td><td>$ 2302.6</td><td>$ 126.1</td><td>$ 547.6</td><td>$ 1174.9</td><td>$ 454.0</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>capital lease obligations</td><td>4.4</td><td>1.0</td><td>0.8</td><td>0.5</td><td>2.1</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>interest payments on long-term debt ( b )</td><td>698.6</td><td>142.9</td><td>246.3</td><td>152.5</td><td>156.9</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>operating leases</td><td>218.5</td><td>49.9</td><td>71.7</td><td>42.5</td><td>54.4</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>purchase obligations ( c )</td><td>6092.6</td><td>2397.2</td><td>3118.8</td><td>576.6</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>common stock repurchase agreements</td><td>131.0</td><td>131.0</td><td>2013</td><td>2013</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>legal settlement</td><td>70.0</td><td>70.0</td><td>2013</td><td>2013</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>total payments on contractual obligations</td><td>$ 9517.7</td><td>$ 2918.1</td><td>$ 3985.2</td><td>$ 1947.0</td><td>$ 667.4</td></tr></table> total payments on contractual obligations $ 9517.7 $ 2918.1 $ 3985.2 $ 1947.0 $ 667.4 ( a ) amounts reported in local currencies have been translated at the year-end exchange rates . ( b ) for variable rate facilities , amounts are based on interest rates in effect at year end and do not contemplate the effects of hedging instruments . ( c ) the company 2019s purchase obligations include contracted amounts for aluminum , steel , plastic resin and other direct materials . also included are commitments for purchases of natural gas and electricity , aerospace and technologies contracts and other less significant items . in cases where variable prices and/or usage are involved , management 2019s best estimates have been used . depending on the circumstances , early termination of the contracts may not result in penalties and , therefore , actual payments could vary significantly . contributions to the company 2019s defined benefit pension plans , not including the unfunded german plans , are expected to be $ 49 million in 2008 . this estimate may change based on plan asset performance . benefit payments related to these plans are expected to be $ 66 million , $ 70 million , $ 74 million , $ 77 million and $ 82 million for the years ending december 31 , 2008 through 2012 , respectively , and a total of $ 473 million for the years 2013 through 2017 . payments to participants in the unfunded german plans are expected to be approximately $ 26 million in each of the years 2008 through 2012 and a total of $ 136 million for the years 2013 through 2017 . in accordance with united kingdom pension regulations , ball has provided an a38 million guarantee to the plan for its defined benefit plan in the united kingdom . if the company 2019s credit rating falls below specified levels , ball will be required to either : ( 1 ) contribute an additional a38 million to the plan ; ( 2 ) provide a letter of credit to the plan in that amount or ( 3 ) if imposed by the appropriate regulatory agency , provide a lien on company assets in that amount for the benefit of the plan . the guarantee can be removed upon approval by both ball and the pension plan trustees . our share repurchase program in 2007 was $ 211.3 million , net of issuances , compared to $ 45.7 million net repurchases in 2006 and $ 358.1 million in 2005 . the net repurchases included the $ 51.9 million settlement on january 5 , 2007 , of a forward contract entered into in december 2006 for the repurchase of 1200000 shares . however , the 2007 net repurchases did not include a forward contract entered into in december 2007 for the repurchase of 675000 shares . the contract was settled on january 7 , 2008 , for $ 31 million in cash . on december 12 , 2007 , in a privately negotiated transaction , ball entered into an accelerated share repurchase agreement to buy $ 100 million of its common shares using cash on hand and available borrowings . the company advanced the $ 100 million on january 7 , 2008 , and received approximately 2 million shares , which represented 90 percent of the total shares as calculated using the previous day 2019s closing price . the exact number of shares to be repurchased under the agreement , which will be determined on the settlement date ( no later than june 5 , 2008 ) , is subject to an adjustment based on a weighted average price calculation for the period between the initial purchase date and the settlement date . the company has the option to settle the contract in either cash or shares . including the settlements of the forward share purchase contract and the accelerated share repurchase agreement , we expect to repurchase approximately $ 300 million of our common shares , net of issuances , in 2008 . annual cash dividends paid on common stock were 40 cents per share in 2007 , 2006 and 2005 . total dividends paid were $ 40.6 million in 2007 , $ 41 million in 2006 and $ 42.5 million in 2005. .

['40.0', '0.4', '41.0', '102.5']

['what is the fair value of notes due in 2015 plus those due 2017?', 'what is the fair value of those due 2019?', 'what is the total sum including all 3 years?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: credit facility , which was amended in 2013 and 2012 . in march 2014 , the company 2019s credit facility was further amended to extend the maturity date to march 2019 . the amount of the aggregate commitment is $ 3.990 billion ( the 201c2014 credit facility 201d ) . the 2014 credit facility permits the company to request up to an additional $ 1.0 billion of borrowing capacity , subject to lender credit approval , increasing the overall size of the 2014 credit facility to an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $ 4.990 billion . interest on borrowings outstanding accrues at a rate based on the applicable london interbank offered rate plus a spread . the 2014 credit facility requires the company not to exceed a maximum leverage ratio ( ratio of net debt to earnings before interest , taxes , depreciation and amortization , where net debt equals total debt less unrestricted cash ) of 3 to 1 , which was satisfied with a ratio of less than 1 to 1 at december 31 , 2014 . the 2014 credit facility provides back-up liquidity , funds ongoing working capital for general corporate purposes and funds various investment opportunities . at december 31 , 2014 , the company had no amount outstanding under the 2014 credit facility . commercial paper program . on october 14 , 2009 , blackrock established a commercial paper program ( the 201ccp program 201d ) under which the company could issue unsecured commercial paper notes ( the 201ccp notes 201d ) on a private placement basis up to a maximum aggregate amount outstanding at any time of $ 3.0 billion . blackrock increased the maximum aggregate amount that could be borrowed under the cp program to $ 3.5 billion in 2011 and to $ 3.785 billion in 2012 . in april 2013 , blackrock increased the maximum aggregate amount for which the company could issue unsecured cp notes on a private-placement basis up to a maximum aggregate amount outstanding at any time of $ 3.990 billion . the cp program is currently supported by the 2014 credit facility . at december 31 , 2014 , blackrock had no cp notes outstanding . long-term borrowings the carrying value and fair value of long-term borrowings estimated using market prices at december 31 , 2014 included the following : ( in millions ) maturity amount unamortized discount carrying value fair value . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>maturity amount</td><td>unamortized discount</td><td>carrying value</td><td>fair value</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>1.375% ( 1.375 % ) notes due 2015</td><td>$ 750</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ 750</td><td>$ 753</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>6.25% ( 6.25 % ) notes due 2017</td><td>700</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td><td>699</td><td>785</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>5.00% ( 5.00 % ) notes due 2019</td><td>1000</td><td>-2 ( 2 )</td><td>998</td><td>1134</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>4.25% ( 4.25 % ) notes due 2021</td><td>750</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td><td>747</td><td>825</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>3.375% ( 3.375 % ) notes due 2022</td><td>750</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td><td>747</td><td>783</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>3.50% ( 3.50 % ) notes due 2024</td><td>1000</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td><td>997</td><td>1029</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total long-term borrowings</td><td>$ 4950</td><td>$ -12 ( 12 )</td><td>$ 4938</td><td>$ 5309</td></tr></table> long-term borrowings at december 31 , 2013 had a carrying value of $ 4.939 billion and a fair value of $ 5.284 billion determined using market prices at the end of december 2013 . 2024 notes . in march 2014 , the company issued $ 1.0 billion in aggregate principal amount of 3.50% ( 3.50 % ) senior unsecured and unsubordinated notes maturing on march 18 , 2024 ( the 201c2024 notes 201d ) . the net proceeds of the 2024 notes were used to refinance certain indebtedness which matured in the fourth quarter of 2014 . interest is payable semi-annually in arrears on march 18 and september 18 of each year , or approximately $ 35 million per year . the 2024 notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price . the 2024 notes were issued at a discount of $ 3 million that is being amortized over the term of the notes . the company incurred approximately $ 6 million of debt issuance costs , which are being amortized over the term of the 2024 notes . at december 31 , 2014 , $ 6 million of unamortized debt issuance costs was included in other assets on the consolidated statement of financial condition . 2015 and 2022 notes . in may 2012 , the company issued $ 1.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured unsubordinated obligations . these notes were issued as two separate series of senior debt securities , including $ 750 million of 1.375% ( 1.375 % ) notes maturing in june 2015 ( the 201c2015 notes 201d ) and $ 750 million of 3.375% ( 3.375 % ) notes maturing in june 2022 ( the 201c2022 notes 201d ) . net proceeds were used to fund the repurchase of blackrock 2019s common stock and series b preferred from barclays and affiliates and for general corporate purposes . interest on the 2015 notes and the 2022 notes of approximately $ 10 million and $ 25 million per year , respectively , is payable semi-annually on june 1 and december 1 of each year , which commenced december 1 , 2012 . the 2015 notes and 2022 notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price . the 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price represents a price , subject to the specific terms of the 2015 and 2022 notes and related indenture , that is the greater of ( a ) par value and ( b ) the present value of future payments that will not be paid because of an early redemption , which is discounted at a fixed spread over a comparable treasury security . the 2015 notes and 2022 notes were issued at a discount of $ 5 million that is being amortized over the term of the notes . the company incurred approximately $ 7 million of debt issuance costs , which are being amortized over the respective terms of the 2015 notes and 2022 notes . at december 31 , 2014 , $ 4 million of unamortized debt issuance costs was included in other assets on the consolidated statement of financial condition . 2021 notes . in may 2011 , the company issued $ 1.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured unsubordinated obligations . these notes were issued as two separate series of senior debt securities , including $ 750 million of 4.25% ( 4.25 % ) notes maturing in may 2021 and $ 750 million of floating rate notes ( 201c2013 floating rate notes 201d ) , which were repaid in may 2013 at maturity . net proceeds of this offering were used to fund the repurchase of blackrock 2019s series b preferred from affiliates of merrill lynch & co. , inc . ( 201cmerrill lynch 201d ) . interest .

['1538.0', '1134.0', '2672.0']

['what was the total of us dollar notes issued in november of 2014, in millions?', 'and what was that total for the entire year?', 'and concerning the euro notes, what was their full total for 2014, also in millions?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: our debt issuances in 2014 were as follows : ( in millions ) type face value ( e ) interest rate issuance maturity euro notes ( a ) 20ac750 ( approximately $ 1029 ) 1.875% ( 1.875 % ) march 2014 march 2021 euro notes ( a ) 20ac1000 ( approximately $ 1372 ) 2.875% ( 2.875 % ) march 2014 march 2026 euro notes ( b ) 20ac500 ( approximately $ 697 ) 2.875% ( 2.875 % ) may 2014 may 2029 swiss franc notes ( c ) chf275 ( approximately $ 311 ) 0.750% ( 0.750 % ) may 2014 december 2019 swiss franc notes ( b ) chf250 ( approximately $ 283 ) 1.625% ( 1.625 % ) may 2014 may 2024 u.s . dollar notes ( d ) $ 500 1.250% ( 1.250 % ) november 2014 november 2017 u.s . dollar notes ( d ) $ 750 3.250% ( 3.250 % ) november 2014 november 2024 u.s . dollar notes ( d ) $ 750 4.250% ( 4.250 % ) november 2014 november 2044 ( a ) interest on these notes is payable annually in arrears beginning in march 2015 . ( b ) interest on these notes is payable annually in arrears beginning in may 2015 . ( c ) interest on these notes is payable annually in arrears beginning in december 2014 . ( d ) interest on these notes is payable semiannually in arrears beginning in may 2015 . ( e ) u.s . dollar equivalents for foreign currency notes were calculated based on exchange rates on the date of issuance . the net proceeds from the sale of the securities listed in the table above will be used for general corporate purposes . the weighted-average time to maturity of our long-term debt was 10.8 years at the end of 2013 and 2014 . 2022 off-balance sheet arrangements and aggregate contractual obligations we have no off-balance sheet arrangements , including special purpose entities , other than guarantees and contractual obligations discussed below . guarantees 2013 at december 31 , 2014 , we were contingently liable for $ 1.0 billion of guarantees of our own performance , which were primarily related to excise taxes on the shipment of our products . there is no liability in the consolidated financial statements associated with these guarantees . at december 31 , 2014 , our third-party guarantees were insignificant. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>type</td><td></td><td>face value ( e )</td><td>interest rate</td><td>issuance</td><td>maturity</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>euro notes</td><td>( a )</td><td>20ac750 ( approximately $ 1029 )</td><td>1.875% ( 1.875 % )</td><td>march 2014</td><td>march 2021</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>euro notes</td><td>( a )</td><td>20ac1000 ( approximately $ 1372 )</td><td>2.875% ( 2.875 % )</td><td>march 2014</td><td>march 2026</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>euro notes</td><td>( b )</td><td>20ac500 ( approximately $ 697 )</td><td>2.875% ( 2.875 % )</td><td>may 2014</td><td>may 2029</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>swiss franc notes</td><td>( c )</td><td>chf275 ( approximately $ 311 )</td><td>0.750% ( 0.750 % )</td><td>may 2014</td><td>december 2019</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>swiss franc notes</td><td>( b )</td><td>chf250 ( approximately $ 283 )</td><td>1.625% ( 1.625 % )</td><td>may 2014</td><td>may 2024</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>u.s . dollar notes</td><td>( d )</td><td>$ 500</td><td>1.250% ( 1.250 % )</td><td>november 2014</td><td>november 2017</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>u.s . dollar notes</td><td>( d )</td><td>$ 750</td><td>3.250% ( 3.250 % )</td><td>november 2014</td><td>november 2024</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>u.s . dollar notes</td><td>( d )</td><td>$ 750</td><td>4.250% ( 4.250 % )</td><td>november 2014</td><td>november 2044</td></tr></table> our debt issuances in 2014 were as follows : ( in millions ) type face value ( e ) interest rate issuance maturity euro notes ( a ) 20ac750 ( approximately $ 1029 ) 1.875% ( 1.875 % ) march 2014 march 2021 euro notes ( a ) 20ac1000 ( approximately $ 1372 ) 2.875% ( 2.875 % ) march 2014 march 2026 euro notes ( b ) 20ac500 ( approximately $ 697 ) 2.875% ( 2.875 % ) may 2014 may 2029 swiss franc notes ( c ) chf275 ( approximately $ 311 ) 0.750% ( 0.750 % ) may 2014 december 2019 swiss franc notes ( b ) chf250 ( approximately $ 283 ) 1.625% ( 1.625 % ) may 2014 may 2024 u.s . dollar notes ( d ) $ 500 1.250% ( 1.250 % ) november 2014 november 2017 u.s . dollar notes ( d ) $ 750 3.250% ( 3.250 % ) november 2014 november 2024 u.s . dollar notes ( d ) $ 750 4.250% ( 4.250 % ) november 2014 november 2044 ( a ) interest on these notes is payable annually in arrears beginning in march 2015 . ( b ) interest on these notes is payable annually in arrears beginning in may 2015 . ( c ) interest on these notes is payable annually in arrears beginning in december 2014 . ( d ) interest on these notes is payable semiannually in arrears beginning in may 2015 . ( e ) u.s . dollar equivalents for foreign currency notes were calculated based on exchange rates on the date of issuance . the net proceeds from the sale of the securities listed in the table above will be used for general corporate purposes . the weighted-average time to maturity of our long-term debt was 10.8 years at the end of 2013 and 2014 . 2022 off-balance sheet arrangements and aggregate contractual obligations we have no off-balance sheet arrangements , including special purpose entities , other than guarantees and contractual obligations discussed below . guarantees 2013 at december 31 , 2014 , we were contingently liable for $ 1.0 billion of guarantees of our own performance , which were primarily related to excise taxes on the shipment of our products . there is no liability in the consolidated financial statements associated with these guarantees . at december 31 , 2014 , our third-party guarantees were insignificant. .

['1500.0', '2000.0', '3098.0']

['what was total operating income in 2013?', 'what is that times 1000?', 'what is that less the operating income growth value in 2013?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: reinsurance commissions , fees and other revenue decreased 2% ( 2 % ) in 2014 reflecting a 1% ( 1 % ) unfavorable impact from foreign currency exchange rates and 1% ( 1 % ) decline in organic revenue growth due primarily to a significant unfavorable market impact in treaty , partially offset by net new business growth in treaty placements globally and growth in capital markets transactions and advisory business , as well as facultative placements . operating income operating income increased $ 108 million , or 7% ( 7 % ) , from 2013 to $ 1.6 billion in 2014 . in 2014 , operating income margins in this segment were 21.0% ( 21.0 % ) , an increase of 120 basis points from 19.8% ( 19.8 % ) in 2013 . operating margin improvement was driven by solid organic revenue growth , return on investments , expense discipline and savings related to the restructuring programs , partially offset by a $ 61 million unfavorable impact from foreign currency exchange rates . hr solutions . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>years ended december 31</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>revenue</td><td>$ 4264</td><td>$ 4057</td><td>$ 3925</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating income</td><td>485</td><td>318</td><td>289</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margin</td><td>11.4% ( 11.4 % )</td><td>7.8% ( 7.8 % )</td><td>7.4% ( 7.4 % )</td></tr></table> our hr solutions segment generated approximately 35% ( 35 % ) of our consolidated total revenues in 2014 and provides a broad range of human capital services , as follows : 2022 retirement specializes in global actuarial services , defined contribution consulting , tax and erisa consulting , and pension administration . 2022 compensation focuses on compensatory advisory/counsel including : compensation planning design , executive reward strategies , salary survey and benchmarking , market share studies and sales force effectiveness , with special expertise in the financial services and technology industries . 2022 strategic human capital delivers advice to complex global organizations on talent , change and organizational effectiveness issues , including talent strategy and acquisition , executive on-boarding , performance management , leadership assessment and development , communication strategy , workforce training and change management . 2022 investment consulting advises public and private companies , other institutions and trustees on developing and maintaining investment programs across a broad range of plan types , including defined benefit plans , defined contribution plans , endowments and foundations . 2022 benefits administration applies our human resource expertise primarily through defined benefit ( pension ) , defined contribution ( 401 ( k ) ) , and health and welfare administrative services . our model replaces the resource-intensive processes once required to administer benefit plans with more efficient , effective , and less costly solutions . 2022 exchanges is building and operating healthcare exchanges that provide employers with a cost effective alternative to traditional employee and retiree healthcare , while helping individuals select the insurance that best meets their needs . 2022 human resource business processing outsourcing provides market-leading solutions to manage employee data ; administer benefits , payroll and other human resources processes ; and record and manage talent , workforce and other core human resource process transactions as well as other complementary services such as flexible spending , dependent audit and participant advocacy . disruption in the global credit markets and the deterioration of the financial markets created significant uncertainty in the marketplace . weak economic conditions in many markets around the globe continued throughout 2014 and have adversely impacted our clients' financial condition and therefore the levels of business activities in the industries and geographies where we operate . while we believe that the majority of our practices are well positioned to manage through this time , these challenges are reducing demand for some of our services and putting continued pressure on the pricing of those services , which is having an adverse effect on our new business and results of operations. .

['1.6', '1600.0', '1492.0']

['what was the net change in development costs from 2006 to 2007?', 'what were development costs in 2007?', 'what is the net change added to the 2007 costs?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: supplementary information on oil and gas producing activities ( unaudited ) c o n t i n u e d summary of changes in standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows relating to proved oil and gas reserves ( in millions ) 2007 2006 2005 sales and transfers of oil and gas produced , net of production , transportation and administrative costs $ ( 4887 ) $ ( 5312 ) $ ( 3754 ) net changes in prices and production , transportation and administrative costs related to future production 12845 ( 1342 ) 6648 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>sales and transfers of oil and gas produced net of production transportation and administrative costs</td><td>$ -4887 ( 4887 )</td><td>$ -5312 ( 5312 )</td><td>$ -3754 ( 3754 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net changes in prices and production transportation and administrative costs related to future production</td><td>12845</td><td>-1342 ( 1342 )</td><td>6648</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>extensions discoveries and improved recovery less related costs</td><td>1816</td><td>1290</td><td>700</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>development costs incurred during the period</td><td>1654</td><td>1251</td><td>1030</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>changes in estimated future development costs</td><td>-1727 ( 1727 )</td><td>-527 ( 527 )</td><td>-552 ( 552 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>revisions of previous quantity estimates</td><td>290</td><td>1319</td><td>820</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>net changes in purchases and sales of minerals in place</td><td>23</td><td>30</td><td>4557</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>accretion of discount</td><td>1726</td><td>1882</td><td>1124</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>net change in income taxes</td><td>-6751 ( 6751 )</td><td>-660 ( 660 )</td><td>-6694 ( 6694 )</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>timing and other</td><td>-12 ( 12 )</td><td>-14 ( 14 )</td><td>307</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>net change for the year</td><td>4977</td><td>-2083 ( 2083 )</td><td>4186</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>beginning of year</td><td>8518</td><td>10601</td><td>6415</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>end of year</td><td>$ 13495</td><td>$ 8518</td><td>$ 10601</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>net change for the year from discontinued operations</td><td>$ 2013</td><td>$ -216 ( 216 )</td><td>$ 162</td></tr></table> .

['403.0', '1654.0', '2057.0']

['what is the connected fitness value in 2014?', 'what is that divided by 1000?', 'what is that divided by 2014 net revenues?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: 2022 net revenues in our connected fitness operating segment increased $ 34.2 million to $ 53.4 million in 2015 from $ 19.2 million in 2014 primarily due to revenues generated from our two connected fitness acquisitions in 2015 and growth in our existing connected fitness business . operating income ( loss ) by segment is summarized below: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>year ended december 31 , 2015</td><td>year ended december 31 , 2014</td><td>year ended december 31 , $ change</td><td>year ended december 31 , % ( % ) change</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>north america</td><td>$ 460961</td><td>$ 372347</td><td>$ 88614</td><td>23.8% ( 23.8 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>emea</td><td>3122</td><td>-11763 ( 11763 )</td><td>14885</td><td>126.5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>asia-pacific</td><td>36358</td><td>21858</td><td>14500</td><td>66.3</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>latin america</td><td>-30593 ( 30593 )</td><td>-15423 ( 15423 )</td><td>-15170 ( 15170 )</td><td>-98.4 ( 98.4 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>connected fitness</td><td>-61301 ( 61301 )</td><td>-13064 ( 13064 )</td><td>-48237 ( 48237 )</td><td>-369.2 ( 369.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total operating income</td><td>$ 408547</td><td>$ 353955</td><td>$ 54592</td><td>15.4% ( 15.4 % )</td></tr></table> the increase in total operating income was driven by the following : 2022 operating income in our north america operating segment increased $ 88.6 million to $ 461.0 million in 2015 from $ 372.4 million in 2014 primarily due to the items discussed above in the consolidated results of operations . 2022 operating income in our emea operating segment increased $ 14.9 million to $ 3.1 million in 2015 from a loss of $ 11.8 million in 2014 primarily due to sales growth discussed above in the consolidated results of operations . 2022 operating income in our asia-pacific operating segment increased $ 14.5 million to $ 36.4 million in 2015 from $ 21.9 million in 2014 primarily due to sales growth discussed above in the consolidated results of operations . 2022 operating loss in our latin america operating segment increased $ 15.2 million to $ 30.6 million in 2015 from $ 15.4 million in 2014 primarily due to increased investments to support growth in the region and the economic challenges in brazil during the period . this increase in operating loss was offset by sales growth discussed above . 2022 operating loss in our connected fitness segment increased $ 48.2 million to $ 61.3 million in 2015 from $ 13.1 million in 2014 primarily due to investments to support growth in our connected fitness business , including the impact of our two connected fitness acquisitions in 2015 . these acquisitions contributed $ 23.6 million to the operating loss for the connected fitness segment in 2015 . seasonality historically , we have recognized a majority of our net revenues and a significant portion of our income from operations in the last two quarters of the year , driven primarily by increased sales volume of our products during the fall selling season , including our higher priced cold weather products , along with a larger proportion of higher margin direct to consumer sales . seasonality could have an impact on the timing of accruals if the sales in the last two quarters of the year do not materialize . the level of our working capital generally reflects the seasonality and growth in our business . we generally expect inventory , accounts payable and certain accrued expenses to be higher in the second and third quarters in preparation for the fall selling season. .

['-13064.0', '-13.064', '-0.68042']

['what is the value of an investment in cadence design systems inc. in 2012?', 'what is the net change in value?', 'what rate of return does this represent?', 'what about the net change in value of an investment in nasdaq composite from 2007 to 2012?', 'what is the rate of return for nasdaq composite?', 'what is the difference in rate of return among these investments?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: stockholder return performance graphs the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total stockholder return on our common stock relative to the cumulative total return of the nasdaq composite index and the s&p 400 information technology index . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each index ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on december 29 , 2007 and tracks it through december 29 , 2012 . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , and s&p 400 information technology cadence design systems , inc . nasdaq composite s&p 400 information technology 12/29/1212/31/111/1/111/2/101/3/0912/29/07 *$ 100 invested on 12/29/07 in stock or 12/31/07 in index , including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright a9 2013 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>12/29/2007</td><td>1/3/2009</td><td>1/2/2010</td><td>1/1/2011</td><td>12/31/2011</td><td>12/29/2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cadence design systems inc .</td><td>100.00</td><td>22.55</td><td>35.17</td><td>48.50</td><td>61.07</td><td>78.92</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>nasdaq composite</td><td>100.00</td><td>59.03</td><td>82.25</td><td>97.32</td><td>98.63</td><td>110.78</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p 400 information technology</td><td>100.00</td><td>54.60</td><td>82.76</td><td>108.11</td><td>95.48</td><td>109.88</td></tr></table> the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance .

['78.92', '-21.08', '-0.2108', '10.78', '0.1078', '-31.86']

['what was the total weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations in 2016 and 2017?', 'and including the value for 2015?', 'so what was the average during this time?', 'how much did the weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations change between 2016 and 2017?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: of prior service cost or credits , and net actuarial gains or losses ) as part of non-operating income . we adopted the requirements of asu no . 2017-07 on january 1 , 2018 using the retrospective transition method . we expect the adoption of asu no . 2017-07 to result in an increase to consolidated operating profit of $ 471 million and $ 846 million for 2016 and 2017 , respectively , and a corresponding decrease in non-operating income for each year . we do not expect any impact to our business segment operating profit , our consolidated net earnings , or cash flows as a result of adopting asu no . 2017-07 . intangibles-goodwill and other in january 2017 , the fasb issued asu no . 2017-04 , intangibles-goodwill and other ( topic 350 ) , which eliminates the requirement to compare the implied fair value of reporting unit goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill ( commonly referred to as step 2 ) from the goodwill impairment test . the new standard does not change how a goodwill impairment is identified . wewill continue to perform our quantitative and qualitative goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of each reporting unit to its carrying amount , but if we are required to recognize a goodwill impairment charge , under the new standard the amount of the charge will be calculated by subtracting the reporting unit 2019s fair value from its carrying amount . under the prior standard , if we were required to recognize a goodwill impairment charge , step 2 required us to calculate the implied value of goodwill by assigning the fair value of a reporting unit to all of its assets and liabilities as if that reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination and the amount of the charge was calculated by subtracting the reporting unit 2019s implied fair value of goodwill from its actual goodwill balance . the new standard is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after december 15 , 2019 , with early adoption permitted , and should be applied prospectively from the date of adoption . we elected to adopt the new standard for future goodwill impairment tests at the beginning of the third quarter of 2017 , because it significantly simplifies the evaluation of goodwill for impairment . the impact of the new standard will depend on the outcomes of future goodwill impairment tests . derivatives and hedging inaugust 2017 , the fasb issuedasu no . 2017-12derivatives and hedging ( topic 815 ) , which eliminates the requirement to separately measure and report hedge ineffectiveness . the guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after december 15 , 2018 , with early adoption permitted . we do not expect a significant impact to our consolidated assets and liabilities , net earnings , or cash flows as a result of adopting this new standard . we plan to adopt the new standard january 1 , 2019 . leases in february 2016 , the fasb issuedasu no . 2016-02 , leases ( topic 842 ) , which requires the recognition of lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet and disclosure of key information about leasing arrangements for both lessees and lessors . the new standard is effective january 1 , 2019 for public companies , with early adoption permitted . the new standard currently requires the application of a modified retrospective approach to the beginning of the earliest period presented in the financial statements . we are continuing to evaluate the expected impact to our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures . we plan to adopt the new standard effective january 1 , 2019 . note 2 2013 earnings per share theweighted average number of shares outstanding used to compute earnings per common sharewere as follows ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations</td><td>287.8</td><td>299.3</td><td>310.3</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>weighted average dilutive effect of equity awards</td><td>2.8</td><td>3.8</td><td>4.4</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations</td><td>290.6</td><td>303.1</td><td>314.7</td></tr></table> we compute basic and diluted earnings per common share by dividing net earnings by the respectiveweighted average number of common shares outstanding for the periods presented . our calculation of diluted earnings per common share also includes the dilutive effects for the assumed vesting of outstanding restricted stock units ( rsus ) , performance stock units ( psus ) and exercise of outstanding stock options based on the treasury stock method . there were no significant anti-dilutive equity awards for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 . note 3 2013 acquisitions and divestitures acquisition of sikorsky aircraft corporation on november 6 , 2015 , we completed the acquisition of sikorsky from united technologies corporation ( utc ) and certain of utc 2019s subsidiaries . the purchase price of the acquisition was $ 9.0 billion , net of cash acquired . as a result of the acquisition .

['593.7', '908.4', '302.8', '-12.5']

['what is the sum of interest only product in 2012 and principal and interest product in 2012?', 'what is the value of principal and interest product in 2012?', 'what is that value over the sum of both product values?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: generally , our variable-rate home equity lines of credit have either a seven or ten year draw period , followed by a 20 year amortization term . during the draw period , we have home equity lines of credit where borrowers pay interest only and home equity lines of credit where borrowers pay principal and interest . based upon outstanding balances at december 31 , 2011 , the following table presents the periods when home equity lines of credit draw periods are scheduled to end . home equity lines of credit - draw period end dates in millions interest only product principal and interest product . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>interest only product</td><td>principal and interest product</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2012</td><td>$ 904</td><td>$ 266</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2013</td><td>1211</td><td>331</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2014</td><td>2043</td><td>598</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2015</td><td>1988</td><td>820</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2016 and thereafter</td><td>6961</td><td>5601</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total ( a )</td><td>$ 13107</td><td>$ 7616</td></tr></table> ( a ) includes approximately $ 306 million , $ 44 million , $ 60 million , $ 100 million , and $ 246 million of home equity lines of credit with balloon payments with draw periods scheduled to end in 2012 , 2013 , 2014 , 2015 , and 2016 and thereafter , respectively . we view home equity lines of credit where borrowers are paying principal and interest under the draw period as less risky than those where the borrowers are paying interest only , as these borrowers have a demonstrated ability to make some level of principal and interest payments . based upon outstanding balances , and excluding purchased impaired loans , at december 31 , 2011 , for home equity lines of credit for which the borrower can no longer draw ( e.g. , draw period has ended or borrowing privileges have been terminated ) , approximately 4.32% ( 4.32 % ) were 30-89 days past due and approximately 5.57% ( 5.57 % ) were greater than or equal to 90 days past due . generally , when a borrower becomes 60 days past due , we terminate borrowing privileges , and those privileges are not subsequently reinstated . at that point , we continue our collection/recovery processes , which may include a loss mitigation loan modification resulting in a loan that is classified as a tdr . see note 5 asset quality and allowances for loan and lease losses and unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report for additional information . loan modifications and troubled debt restructurings consumer loan modifications we modify loans under government and pnc-developed programs based upon our commitment to help eligible homeowners and borrowers avoid foreclosure , where appropriate . initially , a borrower is evaluated for a modification under a government program . if a borrower does not qualify under a government program , the borrower is then evaluated under a pnc program . our programs utilize both temporary and permanent modifications and typically reduce the interest rate , extend the term and/or defer principal . temporary and permanent modifications under programs involving a change to loan terms are generally classified as tdrs . further , certain payment plans and trial payment arrangements which do not include a contractual change to loan terms may be classified as tdrs . additional detail on tdrs is discussed below as well as in note 5 asset quality and allowances for loan and lease losses and unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report . a temporary modification , with a term between three and 60 months , involves a change in original loan terms for a period of time and reverts to the original loan terms as of a specific date or the occurrence of an event , such as a failure to pay in accordance with the terms of the modification . typically , these modifications are for a period of up to 24 months after which the interest rate reverts to the original loan rate . a permanent modification , with a term greater than 60 months , is a modification in which the terms of the original loan are changed . permanent modifications primarily include the government-created home affordable modification program ( hamp ) or pnc-developed hamp-like modification programs . for consumer loan programs , such as residential mortgages and home equity loans and lines , we will enter into a temporary modification when the borrower has indicated a temporary hardship and a willingness to bring current the delinquent loan balance . examples of this situation often include delinquency due to illness or death in the family , or a loss of employment . permanent modifications are entered into when it is confirmed that the borrower does not possess the income necessary to continue making loan payments at the current amount , but our expectation is that payments at lower amounts can be made . residential mortgage and home equity loans and lines have been modified with changes in terms for up to 60 months , although the majority involve periods of three to 24 months . we also monitor the success rates and delinquency status of our loan modification programs to assess their effectiveness in serving our customers 2019 needs while mitigating credit losses . the following tables provide the number of accounts and unpaid principal balance of modified consumer real estate related loans as well as the number of accounts and unpaid principal balance of modified loans that were 60 days or more past due as of six months , nine months and twelve months after the modification date . 78 the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k .

['1170.0', '266.0', '0.22735']

['what was the net change in revenue from 2006 to 2007?', 'what is the 2007 transmission revenue divided by that net change?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: entergy texas , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to an increase in power purchases as a result of the purchased power agreements between entergy gulf states louisiana and entergy texas and an increase in the average market prices of purchased power and natural gas , substantially offset by a decrease in deferred fuel expense as a result of decreased recovery from customers of fuel costs . other regulatory charges increased primarily due to an increase of $ 6.9 million in the recovery of bond expenses related to the securitization bonds . the recovery became effective july 2007 . see note 5 to the financial statements for additional information regarding the securitization bonds . 2007 compared to 2006 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2007 to 2006 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2006 net revenue</td><td>$ 403.3</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>purchased power capacity</td><td>13.1</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>securitization transition charge</td><td>9.9</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>9.7</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>transmission revenue</td><td>6.1</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>base revenue</td><td>2.6</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>other</td><td>-2.4 ( 2.4 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>2007 net revenue</td><td>$ 442.3</td></tr></table> the purchased power capacity variance is due to changes in the purchased power capacity costs included in the calculation in 2007 compared to 2006 used to bill generation costs between entergy texas and entergy gulf states louisiana . the securitization transition charge variance is due to the issuance of securitization bonds . as discussed above , in june 2007 , egsrf i , a company wholly-owned and consolidated by entergy texas , issued securitization bonds and with the proceeds purchased from entergy texas the transition property , which is the right to recover from customers through a transition charge amounts sufficient to service the securitization bonds . see note 5 to the financial statements herein for details of the securitization bond issuance . the volume/weather variance is due to increased electricity usage on billed retail sales , including the effects of more favorable weather in 2007 compared to the same period in 2006 . the increase is also due to an increase in usage during the unbilled sales period . retail electricity usage increased a total of 139 gwh in all sectors . see "critical accounting estimates" below and note 1 to the financial statements for further discussion of the accounting for unbilled revenues . the transmission revenue variance is due to an increase in rates effective june 2007 and new transmission customers in late 2006 . the base revenue variance is due to the transition to competition rider that began in march 2006 . refer to note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rate increase . gross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory charges gross operating revenues decreased primarily due to a decrease of $ 179 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to lower fuel rates and fuel refunds . the decrease was partially offset by the $ 39 million increase in net revenue described above and an increase of $ 44 million in wholesale revenues , including $ 30 million from the system agreement cost equalization payments from entergy arkansas . the receipt of such payments is being .

['39.0', '0.15641']

['what was the change in the defined benefit plan income from 2016 to 2017?', 'and what was that income in 2016?', 'how much, then, does that change represent in relation to this 2016 defined benefit plan, in percentage?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: net sales increased $ 29.9 million , or 6.3% ( 6.3 % ) , due to higher sales volume driven primarily by continuing improvement in the u.s . home products market and the benefit from new product introductions and price increases to help mitigate cumulative raw material cost increases . operating income increased $ 12.6 million , or 20.4% ( 20.4 % ) , due to higher net sales , the benefits from productivity improvements and leveraging sales on our existing fixed cost base . security net sales increased $ 12.8 million , or 2.2% ( 2.2 % ) , due to higher sales volume and price increases to help mitigate cumulative raw material cost increases . these benefits were partially offset by the impact of our exiting of two product lines in our commercial distribution channel . operating income increased $ 5.8 million , or 8.7% ( 8.7 % ) , primarily due to the higher net sales , the benefits from productivity improvements , lower restructuring and other charges ( approximately $ 6 million ) relating to the completion in 2016 of a manufacturing facility relocation , favorable foreign exchange and the related cost savings resulting from the facility relocation . corporate corporate expenses increased by $ 5.7 million mainly due to the impairment of a long lived asset and recognition of an actuarial gain versus an actuarial loss in 2016 and higher defined benefit plan income during 2017 compared to 2016 . ( in millions ) 2017 2016 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>general and administrative expense</td><td>$ -90.3 ( 90.3 )</td><td>$ -80.9 ( 80.9 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>defined benefit plan income</td><td>4.2</td><td>2.9</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>defined benefit plan recognition of actuarial gains ( losses )</td><td>0.5</td><td>-1.9 ( 1.9 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total corporate expenses</td><td>$ -85.6 ( 85.6 )</td><td>$ -79.9 ( 79.9 )</td></tr></table> in future periods the company may record , in the corporate segment , material expense or income associated with actuarial gains and losses arising from periodic remeasurement of our liabilities for defined benefit plans . at a minimum the company will remeasure its defined benefit plan liabilities in the fourth quarter of each year . remeasurements due to plan amendments and settlements may also occur in interim periods during the year . remeasurement of these liabilities attributable to updating our liability discount rates and expected return on assets may , in particular , result in material income or expense recognition . 2016 compared to 2015 total fortune brands net sales net sales increased $ 405.5 million , or 9% ( 9 % ) . the increase was due to higher sales volume primarily from the continuing improvement in u.s . market conditions for home products , the benefit from the acquisitions in our cabinets and plumbing segments and price increases to help mitigate cumulative raw material cost increases and the effect of unfavorable foreign exchange . these benefits were partially offset by unfavorable foreign exchange of approximately $ 27 million and higher sales rebates . cost of products sold cost of products sold increased $ 182.8 million , or 6% ( 6 % ) , due to higher net sales , including the impact of the acquisitions in our cabinets and plumbing segments , partially offset by the benefit of productivity improvements. .

['1.3', '2.9', '0.44828']

['what was, in thousands, the total of purchase commitments in the years of 2010 and 2011, combined?', 'and what was that total only for the year of 2013?', 'what percentage did this 2013 total represent in relation to the full amount of all purchase commitments?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: purchase commitments the company has entered into various purchase agreements for minimum amounts of pulpwood processing and energy over periods ranging from one to twenty years at fixed prices . total purchase commitments are as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2010</td><td>$ 6951</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2011</td><td>5942</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2012</td><td>3659</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2013</td><td>1486</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2014</td><td>1486</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>thereafter</td><td>25048</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>$ 44572</td></tr></table> these purchase agreements are not marked to market . the company purchased $ 37.3 million , $ 29.4 million , and $ 14.5 million during the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively , under these purchase agreements . litigation pca is a party to various legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business . these legal actions cover a broad variety of claims spanning our entire business . as of the date of this filing , the company believes it is not reasonably possible that the resolution of these legal actions will , individually or in the aggregate , have a material adverse effect on its financial position , results of operations , or cash flows . environmental liabilities the potential costs for various environmental matters are uncertain due to such factors as the unknown magnitude of possible cleanup costs , the complexity and evolving nature of governmental laws and regulations and their interpretations , and the timing , varying costs and effectiveness of alternative cleanup technologies . from 1994 through 2009 , remediation costs at the company 2019s mills and corrugated plants totaled approximately $ 3.2 million . as of december 31 , 2009 , the company maintained an environmental reserve of $ 9.1 million relating to on-site landfills ( see note 13 ) and surface impoundments as well as ongoing and anticipated remedial projects . liabilities recorded for environmental contingencies are estimates of the probable costs based upon available information and assumptions . because of these uncertainties , pca 2019s estimates may change . as of the date of this filing , the company believes that it is not reasonably possible that future environmental expenditures and asset retirement obligations above the $ 9.1 million accrued as of december 31 , 2009 , will have a material impact on its financial condition , results of operations , or cash flows . in connection with the sale to pca of its containerboard and corrugated products business , pactiv agreed to retain all liability for all former facilities and all sites associated with pre-closing off-site waste disposal and all environmental liabilities related to a closed landfill located near the company 2019s filer city mill . 13 . asset retirement obligations asset retirement obligations consist primarily of landfill capping and closure and post-closure costs . pca is legally required to perform capping and closure and post-closure care on the landfills at each of the company 2019s mills . in accordance with asc 410 , 201c asset retirement and environmental obligations , 201d pca recognizes the fair value of these liabilities as an asset retirement obligation for each landfill and capitalizes packaging corporation of america notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) december 31 , 2009 .

['12893.0', '1486.0', '0.03334']

['what were the number of stores at the end of 2011?', 'what was the number at the start of 2011?', 'what is the net change?', 'what was the number at the start of 2011?', 'what is the net change divided by the beginning 2011 number?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: the following table sets forth information concerning increases in the total number of our aap stores during the past five years: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>beginning stores</td><td>3460</td><td>3369</td><td>3264</td><td>3243</td><td>3153</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>new stores ( 1 )</td><td>116</td><td>95</td><td>110</td><td>75</td><td>109</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>stores closed</td><td>2014</td><td>-4 ( 4 )</td><td>-5 ( 5 )</td><td>-54 ( 54 )</td><td>-19 ( 19 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>ending stores</td><td>3576</td><td>3460</td><td>3369</td><td>3264</td><td>3243</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) does not include stores that opened as relocations of previously existing stores within the same general market area or substantial renovations of stores . store technology . our store-based information systems are comprised of a proprietary and integrated point of sale , electronic parts catalog , or epc , and store-level inventory management system ( collectively "store system" ) . information maintained by our store system is used to formulate pricing , marketing and merchandising strategies and to replenish inventory accurately and rapidly . our fully integrated system enables our store team members to assist our customers in their parts selection and ordering based on the year , make , model and engine type of their vehicles . our store system provides real-time inventory tracking at the store level allowing store team members to check the quantity of on-hand inventory for any sku , adjust stock levels for select items for store specific events , automatically process returns and defective merchandise , designate skus for cycle counts and track merchandise transfers . if a hard-to-find part or accessory is not available at one of our stores , the store system can determine whether the part is carried and in-stock through our hub or pdq ae networks or can be ordered directly from one of our vendors . available parts and accessories are then ordered electronically from another store , hub , pdq ae or directly from the vendor with immediate confirmation of price , availability and estimated delivery time . our centrally-based epc data management system enables us to reduce the time needed to ( i ) exchange data with our vendors and ( ii ) catalog and deliver updated , accurate parts information . we also support our store operations with additional proprietary systems and customer driven labor scheduling capabilities . all of these systems are tightly integrated and provide real-time , comprehensive information to store personnel , resulting in improved customer service levels , team member productivity and in-stock availability . we plan to start rolling out a new and enhanced epc in fiscal 2013 which is expected to simplify and improve the customer experience . among the improvements is a more efficient way to systematically identify add-on sales to ensure our customers have what they need to complete their automotive repair project . store support center merchandising . purchasing for virtually all of the merchandise for our stores is handled by our merchandise teams located in three primary locations : 2022 store support center in roanoke , virginia ; 2022 regional office in minneapolis , minnesota ; and 2022 global sourcing office in taipei , taiwan . our roanoke team is primarily responsible for the parts categories and our minnesota team is primarily responsible for accessories , oil and chemicals . our global sourcing team works closely with both teams . in fiscal 2012 , we purchased merchandise from approximately 450 vendors , with no single vendor accounting for more than 9% ( 9 % ) of purchases . our purchasing strategy involves negotiating agreements with most of our vendors to purchase merchandise over a specified period of time along with other terms , including pricing , payment terms and volume . the merchandising team has developed strong vendor relationships in the industry and , in a collaborative effort with our vendor partners , utilizes a category management process where we manage the mix of our product offerings to meet customer demand . we believe this process , which develops a customer-focused business plan for each merchandise category , and our global sourcing operation are critical to improving comparable store sales , gross margin and inventory productivity. .

['3460.0', '3369.0', '91.0', '3369.0', '0.02701']

['what was the total of annual long-term debt maturities ( excluding lease obligations ) and annual cash sinking fund requirements for debt outstanding in 2005?', 'what was that in 2004?', 'between the two years, then, how much did that total vary?', 'and what was this variation as a percentage of the 2004 total?', 'and concerning these same two years, how much did the 2005 total represent in relation to the 2004 one?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: entergy corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( d ) the bonds are subject to mandatory tender for purchase from the holders at 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount outstanding on october 1 , 2003 and will then be remarketed . ( e ) on june 1 , 2002 , entergy louisiana remarketed $ 55 million st . charles parish pollution control revenue refunding bonds due 2030 , resetting the interest rate to 4.9% ( 4.9 % ) through may 2005 . ( f ) the bonds are subject to mandatory tender for purchase from the holders at 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount outstanding on june 1 , 2005 and will then be remarketed . ( g ) the fair value excludes lease obligations , long-term doe obligations , and other long-term debt and includes debt due within one year . it is determined using bid prices reported by dealer markets and by nationally recognized investment banking firms . the annual long-term debt maturities ( excluding lease obligations ) and annual cash sinking fund requirements for debt outstanding as of december 31 , 2002 , for the next five years are as follows ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2003</td><td>$ 1150786</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2004</td><td>$ 925005</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2005</td><td>$ 540372</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2006</td><td>$ 139952</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2007</td><td>$ 475288</td></tr></table> not included are other sinking fund requirements of approximately $ 30.2 million annually , which may be satisfied by cash or by certification of property additions at the rate of 167% ( 167 % ) of such requirements . in december 2002 , when the damhead creek project was sold , the buyer of the project assumed all obligations under the damhead creek credit facilities and the damhead creek interest rate swap agreements . in november 2000 , entergy's non-utility nuclear business purchased the fitzpatrick and indian point 3 power plants in a seller-financed transaction . entergy issued notes to nypa with seven annual installments of approximately $ 108 million commencing one year from the date of the closing , and eight annual installments of $ 20 million commencing eight years from the date of the closing . these notes do not have a stated interest rate , but have an implicit interest rate of 4.8% ( 4.8 % ) . in accordance with the purchase agreement with nypa , the purchase of indian point 2 resulted in entergy's non-utility nuclear business becoming liable to nypa for an additional $ 10 million per year for 10 years , beginning in september 2003 . this liability was recorded upon the purchase of indian point 2 in september 2001 . covenants in the entergy corporation 7.75% ( 7.75 % ) notes require it to maintain a consolidated debt ratio of 65% ( 65 % ) or less of its total capitalization . if entergy's debt ratio exceeds this limit , or if entergy or certain of the domestic utility companies default on other credit facilities or are in bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings , an acceleration of the facility's maturity may occur . in january 2003 , entergy paid in full , at maturity , the outstanding debt relating to the top of iowa wind project . capital funds agreement pursuant to an agreement with certain creditors , entergy corporation has agreed to supply system energy with sufficient capital to : fffd maintain system energy's equity capital at a minimum of 35% ( 35 % ) of its total capitalization ( excluding short-term debt ) ; fffd permit the continued commercial operation of grand gulf 1 ; fffd pay in full all system energy indebtedness for borrowed money when due ; and fffd enable system energy to make payments on specific system energy debt , under supplements to the agreement assigning system energy's rights in the agreement as security for the specific debt. .

['925005.0', '540372.0', '384633.0', '0.71179', '1.71179']

['between the years of 2015 and 2016, what was the change in the estimated sensitivity to a one basis point increase in credit spreads on financial liabilities for which the fair value option was elected?', 'and in the subsequent year of this period, in 2017, what percentage of the total market risk for positions, accounted for at fair value, that are not included in var, was due to equity?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: the goldman sachs group , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s discussion and analysis sensitivity measures certain portfolios and individual positions are not included in var because var is not the most appropriate risk measure . other sensitivity measures we use to analyze market risk are described below . 10% ( 10 % ) sensitivity measures . the table below presents market risk for positions , accounted for at fair value , that are not included in var by asset category. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>$ in millions</td><td>as of december 2017</td><td>as of december 2016</td><td>as of december 2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>equity</td><td>$ 2096</td><td>$ 2085</td><td>$ 2157</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>debt</td><td>1606</td><td>1702</td><td>1479</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total</td><td>$ 3702</td><td>$ 3787</td><td>$ 3636</td></tr></table> in the table above : 2030 the market risk of these positions is determined by estimating the potential reduction in net revenues of a 10% ( 10 % ) decline in the value of these positions . 2030 equity positions relate to private and restricted public equity securities , including interests in funds that invest in corporate equities and real estate and interests in hedge funds . 2030 debt positions include interests in funds that invest in corporate mezzanine and senior debt instruments , loans backed by commercial and residential real estate , corporate bank loans and other corporate debt , including acquired portfolios of distressed loans . 2030 equity and debt funded positions are included in our consolidated statements of financial condition in financial instruments owned . see note 6 to the consolidated financial statements for further information about cash instruments . 2030 these measures do not reflect the diversification effect across asset categories or across other market risk measures . credit spread sensitivity on derivatives and financial liabilities . var excludes the impact of changes in counterparty and our own credit spreads on derivatives , as well as changes in our own credit spreads ( debt valuation adjustment ) on financial liabilities for which the fair value option was elected . the estimated sensitivity to a one basis point increase in credit spreads ( counterparty and our own ) on derivatives was a gain of $ 3 million and $ 2 million ( including hedges ) as of december 2017 and december 2016 , respectively . in addition , the estimated sensitivity to a one basis point increase in our own credit spreads on financial liabilities for which the fair value option was elected was a gain of $ 35 million and $ 25 million as of december 2017 and december 2016 , respectively . however , the actual net impact of a change in our own credit spreads is also affected by the liquidity , duration and convexity ( as the sensitivity is not linear to changes in yields ) of those financial liabilities for which the fair value option was elected , as well as the relative performance of any hedges undertaken . interest rate sensitivity . loans receivable as of december 2017 and december 2016 were $ 65.93 billion and $ 49.67 billion , respectively , substantially all of which had floating interest rates . as of december 2017 and december 2016 , the estimated sensitivity to a 100 basis point increase in interest rates on such loans was $ 527 million and $ 405 million , respectively , of additional interest income over a twelve-month period , which does not take into account the potential impact of an increase in costs to fund such loans . see note 9 to the consolidated financial statements for further information about loans receivable . other market risk considerations as of december 2017 and december 2016 , we had commitments and held loans for which we have obtained credit loss protection from sumitomo mitsui financial group , inc . see note 18 to the consolidated financial statements for further information about such lending commitments . in addition , we make investments in securities that are accounted for as available-for-sale and included in financial instruments owned in the consolidated statements of financial condition . see note 6 to the consolidated financial statements for further information . we also make investments accounted for under the equity method and we also make direct investments in real estate , both of which are included in other assets . direct investments in real estate are accounted for at cost less accumulated depreciation . see note 13 to the consolidated financial statements for further information about other assets . goldman sachs 2017 form 10-k 93 .

['10.0', '0.56618']

['what was the unpaid principal balance outstanding of loans sold as a participant in these programs in 2011, in billions?', 'and what was it in 2010, also in billions?', 'what was, then, in billions, the total unpaid principal balance outstanding in both years combined?', 'and what is the average between them, in billions?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: the table below reflects the estimated effects on pension expense of certain changes in annual assumptions , using 2012 estimated expense as a baseline . change in assumption ( a ) estimated increase to 2012 pension expense ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>change in assumption ( a )</td><td>estimatedincrease to 2012pensionexpense ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>.5% ( .5 % ) decrease in discount rate</td><td>$ 23</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>.5% ( .5 % ) decrease in expected long-term return on assets</td><td>$ 18</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>.5% ( .5 % ) increase in compensation rate</td><td>$ 2</td></tr></table> ( a ) the impact is the effect of changing the specified assumption while holding all other assumptions constant . our pension plan contribution requirements are not particularly sensitive to actuarial assumptions . investment performance has the most impact on contribution requirements and will drive the amount of permitted contributions in future years . also , current law , including the provisions of the pension protection act of 2006 , sets limits as to both minimum and maximum contributions to the plan . we do not expect to be required by law to make any contributions to the plan during 2012 . we maintain other defined benefit plans that have a less significant effect on financial results , including various nonqualified supplemental retirement plans for certain employees . recourse and repurchase obligations as discussed in note 3 loan sale and servicing activities and variable interest entities in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report , pnc has sold commercial mortgage and residential mortgage loans directly or indirectly in securitizations and whole-loan sale transactions with continuing involvement . one form of continuing involvement includes certain recourse and loan repurchase obligations associated with the transferred assets in these transactions . commercial mortgage loan recourse obligations we originate , close , and service certain multi-family commercial mortgage loans which are sold to fnma under fnma 2019s delegated underwriting and servicing ( dus ) program . we participated in a similar program with the fhlmc . under these programs , we generally assume up to a one-third pari passu risk of loss on unpaid principal balances through a loss share arrangement . at december 31 , 2011 and december 31 , 2010 , the unpaid principal balance outstanding of loans sold as a participant in these programs was $ 13.0 billion and $ 13.2 billion , respectively . the potential maximum exposure under the loss share arrangements was $ 4.0 billion at both december 31 , 2011 and december 31 , 2010 . we maintain a reserve for estimated losses based on our exposure . the reserve for losses under these programs totaled $ 47 million and $ 54 million as of december 31 , 2011 and december 31 , 2010 , respectively , and is included in other liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet . if payment is required under these programs , we would not have a contractual interest in the collateral underlying the mortgage loans on which losses occurred , although the value of the collateral is taken into account in determining our share of such losses . our exposure and activity associated with these recourse obligations are reported in the corporate & institutional banking segment . residential mortgage loan and home equity repurchase obligations while residential mortgage loans are sold on a non-recourse basis , we assume certain loan repurchase obligations associated with mortgage loans we have sold to investors . these loan repurchase obligations primarily relate to situations where pnc is alleged to have breached certain origination covenants and representations and warranties made to purchasers of the loans in the respective purchase and sale agreements . residential mortgage loans covered by these loan repurchase obligations include first and second-lien mortgage loans we have sold through agency securitizations , non-agency securitizations , and whole-loan sale transactions . as discussed in note 3 in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report , agency securitizations consist of mortgage loans sale transactions with fnma , fhlmc , and the government national mortgage association ( gnma ) program , while non-agency securitizations and whole-loan sale transactions consist of mortgage loans sale transactions with private investors . our historical exposure and activity associated with agency securitization repurchase obligations has primarily been related to transactions with fnma and fhlmc , as indemnification and repurchase losses associated with federal housing agency ( fha ) and department of veterans affairs ( va ) -insured and uninsured loans pooled in gnma securitizations historically have been minimal . repurchase obligation activity associated with residential mortgages is reported in the residential mortgage banking segment . pnc 2019s repurchase obligations also include certain brokered home equity loans/lines that were sold to a limited number of private investors in the financial services industry by national city prior to our acquisition . pnc is no longer engaged in the brokered home equity lending business , and our exposure under these loan repurchase obligations is limited to repurchases of the whole-loans sold in these transactions . repurchase activity associated with brokered home equity lines/loans are reported in the non-strategic assets portfolio segment . loan covenants and representations and warranties are established through loan sale agreements with various investors to provide assurance that pnc has sold loans to the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k 69 .

['13.0', '13.2', '26.2', '13.1']

['what was the change in the return of the kbw bank index from 2009 to 2014?', 'and how much does this change represent in relation to that return in 2009?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: jpmorgan chase & co./2014 annual report 63 five-year stock performance the following table and graph compare the five-year cumulative total return for jpmorgan chase & co . ( 201cjpmorgan chase 201d or the 201cfirm 201d ) common stock with the cumulative return of the s&p 500 index , the kbw bank index and the s&p financial index . the s&p 500 index is a commonly referenced u.s . equity benchmark consisting of leading companies from different economic sectors . the kbw bank index seeks to reflect the performance of banks and thrifts that are publicly traded in the u.s . and is composed of 24 leading national money center and regional banks and thrifts . the s&p financial index is an index of 85 financial companies , all of which are components of the s&p 500 . the firm is a component of all three industry indices . the following table and graph assume simultaneous investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2009 , in jpmorgan chase common stock and in each of the above indices . the comparison assumes that all dividends are reinvested . december 31 , ( in dollars ) 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31 ( in dollars )</td><td>2009</td><td>2010</td><td>2011</td><td>2012</td><td>2013</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>jpmorgan chase</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 102.30</td><td>$ 81.87</td><td>$ 111.49</td><td>$ 152.42</td><td>$ 167.48</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>kbw bank index</td><td>100.00</td><td>123.36</td><td>94.75</td><td>125.91</td><td>173.45</td><td>189.69</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p financial index</td><td>100.00</td><td>112.13</td><td>93.00</td><td>119.73</td><td>162.34</td><td>186.98</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>100.00</td><td>115.06</td><td>117.48</td><td>136.27</td><td>180.39</td><td>205.07</td></tr></table> .

['89.69', '0.8969']

['what is the sum of carrying value of notes due 2014 and 2015?', 'what is the sum including those due in 2017?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: long-term borrowings the carrying value and fair value of long-term borrowings estimated using market prices at december 31 , 2013 included the following : ( in millions ) maturity amount unamortized discount carrying value fair value . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>maturity amount</td><td>unamortized discount</td><td>carrying value</td><td>fair value</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>3.50% ( 3.50 % ) notes due 2014</td><td>$ 1000</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ 1000</td><td>$ 1029</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>1.375% ( 1.375 % ) notes due 2015</td><td>750</td><td>2014</td><td>750</td><td>759</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>6.25% ( 6.25 % ) notes due 2017</td><td>700</td><td>-2 ( 2 )</td><td>698</td><td>812</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>5.00% ( 5.00 % ) notes due 2019</td><td>1000</td><td>-2 ( 2 )</td><td>998</td><td>1140</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>4.25% ( 4.25 % ) notes due 2021</td><td>750</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td><td>747</td><td>799</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>3.375% ( 3.375 % ) notes due 2022</td><td>750</td><td>-4 ( 4 )</td><td>746</td><td>745</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total long-term borrowings</td><td>$ 4950</td><td>$ -11 ( 11 )</td><td>$ 4939</td><td>$ 5284</td></tr></table> long-term borrowings at december 31 , 2012 had a carrying value of $ 5.687 billion and a fair value of $ 6.275 billion determined using market prices at the end of december 2012 . 2015 and 2022 notes . in may 2012 , the company issued $ 1.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured unsubordinated obligations . these notes were issued as two separate series of senior debt securities including $ 750 million of 1.375% ( 1.375 % ) notes maturing in june 2015 ( the 201c2015 notes 201d ) and $ 750 million of 3.375% ( 3.375 % ) notes maturing in june 2022 ( the 201c2022 notes 201d ) . net proceeds were used to fund the repurchase of blackrock 2019s common stock and series b preferred from barclays and affiliates and for general corporate purposes . interest on the 2015 notes and the 2022 notes of approximately $ 10 million and $ 25 million per year , respectively , is payable semi-annually on june 1 and december 1 of each year , which commenced december 1 , 2012 . the 2015 notes and 2022 notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price . the 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price represents a price , subject to the specific terms of the 2015 and 2022 notes and related indenture , that is the greater of ( a ) par value and ( b ) the present value of future payments that will not be paid because of an early redemption , which is discounted at a fixed spread over a comparable treasury security . the 2015 notes and 2022 notes were issued at a discount of $ 5 million that is being amortized over the term of the notes . the company incurred approximately $ 7 million of debt issuance costs , which are being amortized over the respective terms of the 2015 notes and 2022 notes . at december 31 , 2013 , $ 5 million of unamortized debt issuance costs was included in other assets on the consolidated statement of financial condition . 2013 and 2021 notes . in may 2011 , the company issued $ 1.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured unsubordinated obligations . these notes were issued as two separate series of senior debt securities including $ 750 million of 4.25% ( 4.25 % ) notes maturing in may 2021 and $ 750 million of floating rate notes ( 201c2013 floating rate notes 201d ) , which were repaid in may 2013 at maturity . net proceeds of this offering were used to fund the repurchase of blackrock 2019s series b preferred from affiliates of merrill lynch & co. , inc . ( 201cmerrill lynch 201d ) . interest on the 4.25% ( 4.25 % ) notes due in 2021 ( 201c2021 notes 201d ) is payable semi-annually on may 24 and november 24 of each year , which commenced november 24 , 2011 , and is approximately $ 32 million per year . the 2021 notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price . the 2021 notes were issued at a discount of $ 4 million that is being amortized over the term of the notes . the company incurred approximately $ 7 million of debt issuance costs for the $ 1.5 billion note issuances , which are being amortized over the respective terms of the notes . at december 31 , 2013 , $ 3 million of unamortized debt issuance costs was included in other assets on the consolidated statement of financial condition . in may 2011 , in conjunction with the issuance of the 2013 floating rate notes , the company entered into a $ 750 million notional interest rate swap maturing in 2013 to hedge the future cash flows of its obligation at a fixed rate of 1.03% ( 1.03 % ) . during the second quarter of 2013 , the interest rate swap matured and the 2013 floating rate notes were fully repaid . 2012 , 2014 and 2019 notes . in december 2009 , the company issued $ 2.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured and unsubordinated obligations . these notes were issued as three separate series of senior debt securities including $ 0.5 billion of 2.25% ( 2.25 % ) notes , which were repaid in december 2012 , $ 1.0 billion of 3.50% ( 3.50 % ) notes and $ 1.0 billion of 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) notes maturing in december 2014 and 2019 , respectively . net proceeds of this offering were used to repay borrowings under the cp program , which was used to finance a portion of the acquisition of barclays global investors ( 201cbgi 201d ) from barclays on december 1 , 2009 ( the 201cbgi transaction 201d ) , and for general corporate purposes . interest on the 2014 notes and 2019 notes of approximately $ 35 million and $ 50 million per year , respectively , is payable semi-annually in arrears on june 10 and december 10 of each year . these notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price . these notes were issued collectively at a discount of $ 5 million , which is being amortized over the respective terms of the notes . the company incurred approximately $ 13 million of debt issuance costs , which are being amortized over the respective terms of these notes . at december 31 , 2013 , $ 4 million of unamortized debt issuance costs was included in other assets on the consolidated statement of financial condition . 2017 notes . in september 2007 , the company issued $ 700 million in aggregate principal amount of 6.25% ( 6.25 % ) senior unsecured and unsubordinated notes maturing on september 15 , 2017 ( the 201c2017 notes 201d ) . a portion of the net proceeds of the 2017 notes was used to fund the initial cash payment for the acquisition of the fund of funds business of quellos and the remainder was used for general corporate purposes . interest is payable semi-annually in arrears on march 15 and september 15 of each year , or approximately $ 44 million per year . the 2017 notes may be redeemed prior .

['1750.0', '2448.0']

['what is the net change in amortized cost during 2009?', 'what is that over the 2008 value?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: impairment net unrealized losses on securities available for sale were as follows as of december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>fair value</td><td>$ 72699</td><td>$ 54163</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>amortized cost</td><td>74843</td><td>60786</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net unrealized loss pre-tax</td><td>$ -2144 ( 2144 )</td><td>$ -6623 ( 6623 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net unrealized loss after-tax</td><td>$ -1316 ( 1316 )</td><td>$ -4057 ( 4057 )</td></tr></table> the above net unrealized loss amounts at december 31 , 2009 and december 31 , 2008 excluded the remaining net unrealized loss of $ 1.01 billion , or $ 635 million after-tax , and $ 2.27 billion , or $ 1.39 billion after- tax , respectively , related to reclassifications of securities available for sale to securities held to maturity . these after-tax amounts are recorded in other comprehensive income . the decline in the remaining after-tax unrealized loss amounts related to transferred securities resulted from amortization and from the recognition of losses from other-than-temporary impairment on certain of the securities . we conduct periodic reviews of individual securities to assess whether other-than-temporary impairment exists . to the extent that other-than-temporary impairment is identified , the impairment is broken into a credit component and a non-credit component . the credit component is recognized in our consolidated statement of income , and the non-credit component is recognized in other comprehensive income to the extent that management does not intend to sell the security ( see note 3 of the notes to consolidated financial statements included under item 8 ) . the assessment of other-than-temporary impairment involves an evaluation of economic and security- specific factors , which are more fully described in note 3 . such factors are based upon estimates , derived by management , which contemplate current market conditions and security-specific performance . to the extent that market conditions are worse than management 2019s expectations , other-than-temporary impairment could increase , in particular the credit component that would be recognized in our consolidated statement of income . national housing prices , according to the case-shiller national hpi , have declined to date approximately 30% ( 30 % ) peak-to-current . management currently estimates that national housing prices will continue to decline and bottom out during the second half of 2010 , consistent with a peak-to-trough housing price decline of approximately 37% ( 37 % ) . as an indication of the sensitivity of our portfolio with respect to our more significant assumptions underlying our assessment of impairment , if we were to increase our default estimates to 110% ( 110 % ) of management 2019s current expectations with a corresponding slowing of prepayment speeds to 90% ( 90 % ) of management 2019s current expectations , credit-related other-than-temporary impairment could increase by approximately $ 120 million to $ 125 million , which impairment would be recorded in our consolidated statement of income . excluding the securities for which other-than-temporary impairment was recorded , management considers the aggregate decline in fair value of the remaining securities and the resulting net unrealized losses to be temporary and not the result of any material changes in the credit characteristics of the securities . additional information about our assessment of impairment is provided in note 3 of the notes to consolidated financial statements included under item 8. .

['14057.0', '0.23125']

['what were the sales proceeds from cilcorp/medina valley in january 2003?', 'what were the proceeds from aes ecogen/aes mt . stuart in january 2003?', 'what is the sum?', 'what is the sum including mountainview proceeds?', 'what is the proceeds from kelvin?', 'what is the total sum from the 4 projects?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: transaction and commercial issues in many of our businesses . these skills are a valuable resource as we monitor regulatory and tariff schemes to determine our capital budgeting needs and integrate acquisitions . the company expects to realize cost reduction and performance improvement benefits in both earnings and cash flows ; however , there can be no assurance that the reductions and improvements will continue and our inability to sustain the reductions and improvements may result in less than expected earnings and cash flows in 2004 and beyond . asset sales during 2003 , we continued the initiative to sell all or part of certain of the company 2019s subsidiaries . this initiative was designed to decrease the company 2019s dependence on access to capital markets and improve the strength of our balance sheet by reducing financial leverage and improving liquidity . the following chart details the asset sales that were closed during 2003 . sales proceeds project name date completed ( in millions ) location . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>project name</td><td>date completed</td><td>sales proceeds ( in millions )</td><td>location</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cilcorp/medina valley</td><td>january 2003</td><td>$ 495</td><td>united states</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>aes ecogen/aes mt . stuart</td><td>january 2003</td><td>$ 59</td><td>australia</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>mountainview</td><td>march 2003</td><td>$ 30</td><td>united states</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>kelvin</td><td>march 2003</td><td>$ 29</td><td>south africa</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>songas</td><td>april 2003</td><td>$ 94</td><td>tanzania</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>aes barry limited</td><td>july 2003</td><td>a340/$ 62</td><td>united kingdom</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>aes haripur private ltd/aes meghnaghat ltd</td><td>december 2003</td><td>$ 145</td><td>bangladesh</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>aes mtkvari/aes khrami/aes telasi</td><td>august 2003</td><td>$ 23</td><td>republic of georgia</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>medway power limited/aes medway operations limited</td><td>november 2003</td><td>a347/$ 78</td><td>united kingdom</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>aes oasis limited</td><td>december 2003</td><td>$ 150</td><td>pakistan/oman</td></tr></table> the company continues to evaluate its portfolio and business performance and may decide to dispose of additional businesses in the future . however given the improvements in our liquidity there will be a lower emphasis placed on asset sales in the future for purposes of improving liquidity and strengthening the balance sheet . for any sales that happen in the future , there can be no guarantee that the proceeds from such sale transactions will cover the entire investment in the subsidiaries . depending on which businesses are eventually sold , the entire or partial sale of any business may change the current financial characteristics of the company 2019s portfolio and results of operations . furthermore future sales may impact the amount of recurring earnings and cash flows the company would expect to achieve . subsidiary restructuring during 2003 , we completed and initiated restructuring transactions for several of our south american businesses . the efforts are focused on improving the businesses long-term prospects for generating acceptable returns on invested capital or extending short-term debt maturities . businesses impacted include eletropaulo , tiete , uruguaiana and sul in brazil and gener in chile . brazil eletropaulo . aes has owned an interest in eletropaulo since april 1998 , when the company was privatized . in february 2002 aes acquired a controlling interest in the business and as a consequence started to consolidate it . aes financed a significant portion of the acquisition of eletropaulo , including both common and preferred shares , through loans and deferred purchase price financing arrangements provided by the brazilian national development bank 2014 ( 2018 2018bndes 2019 2019 ) , and its wholly-owned subsidiary , bndes participac 0327o 0303es s.a . ( 2018 2018bndespar 2019 2019 ) , to aes 2019s subsidiaries , aes elpa s.a . ( 2018 2018aes elpa 2019 2019 ) and aes transgas empreendimentos , s.a . ( 2018 2018aes transgas 2019 2019 ) . .

['495.0', '59.0', '554.0', '584.0', '29.0', '613.0']

['what was the net change in the fair value of derivatives outstanding from 2007 to 2008?', 'what was the value in 2007?', 'what is the net change over the 2007 value?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: oneok partners 2019 commodity price risk is estimated as a hypothetical change in the price of ngls , crude oil and natural gas at december 31 , 2008 , excluding the effects of hedging and assuming normal operating conditions . oneok partners 2019 condensate sales are based on the price of crude oil . oneok partners estimates the following : 2022 a $ 0.01 per gallon decrease in the composite price of ngls would decrease annual net margin by approximately $ 1.2 million ; 2022 a $ 1.00 per barrel decrease in the price of crude oil would decrease annual net margin by approximately $ 1.0 million ; and 2022 a $ 0.10 per mmbtu decrease in the price of natural gas would decrease annual net margin by approximately $ 0.6 million . the above estimates of commodity price risk do not include any effects on demand for its services that might be caused by , or arise in conjunction with , price changes . for example , a change in the gross processing spread may cause a change in the amount of ethane extracted from the natural gas stream , impacting gathering and processing margins , ngl exchange revenues , natural gas deliveries , and ngl volumes shipped and fractionated . oneok partners is also exposed to commodity price risk primarily as a result of ngls in storage , the relative values of the various ngl products to each other , the relative value of ngls to natural gas and the relative value of ngl purchases at one location and sales at another location , known as basis risk . oneok partners utilizes fixed-price physical forward contracts to reduce earnings volatility related to ngl price fluctuations . oneok partners has not entered into any financial instruments with respect to its ngl marketing activities . in addition , oneok partners is exposed to commodity price risk as its natural gas interstate and intrastate pipelines collect natural gas from its customers for operations or as part of its fee for services provided . when the amount of natural gas consumed in operations by these pipelines differs from the amount provided by its customers , the pipelines must buy or sell natural gas , or store or use natural gas from inventory , which exposes oneok partners to commodity price risk . at december 31 , 2008 , there were no hedges in place with respect to natural gas price risk from oneok partners 2019 natural gas pipeline business . distribution our distribution segment uses derivative instruments to hedge the cost of anticipated natural gas purchases during the winter heating months to protect their customers from upward volatility in the market price of natural gas . gains or losses associated with these derivative instruments are included in , and recoverable through , the monthly purchased gas cost mechanism . energy services our energy services segment is exposed to commodity price risk , basis risk and price volatility arising from natural gas in storage , requirement contracts , asset management contracts and index-based purchases and sales of natural gas at various market locations . we minimize the volatility of our exposure to commodity price risk through the use of derivative instruments , which , under certain circumstances , are designated as cash flow or fair value hedges . we are also exposed to commodity price risk from fixed-price purchases and sales of natural gas , which we hedge with derivative instruments . both the fixed-price purchases and sales and related derivatives are recorded at fair value . fair value component of the energy marketing and risk management assets and liabilities - the following table sets forth the fair value component of the energy marketing and risk management assets and liabilities , excluding $ 21.0 million of net liabilities from derivative instruments declared as either fair value or cash flow hedges. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>( thousands of dollars )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net fair value of derivatives outstanding at december 31 2007</td><td>$ 25171</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>derivatives reclassified or otherwise settled during the period</td><td>-55874 ( 55874 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>fair value of new derivatives entered into during the period</td><td>236772</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other changes in fair value</td><td>52731</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net fair value of derivatives outstanding at december 31 2008 ( a )</td><td>$ 258800</td></tr></table> ( a ) - the maturiti es of derivatives are based on inject ion and withdrawal periods from april through m arc h , which is consistent with our business s trategy . the maturities are as fol lows : $ 225.0 mi llion matures through march 2009 , $ 33.9 mi llion matures through march 2012 and $ ( 0.1 ) mil lion matures through march 2014 . fair v alue com ponent of energy m arketing and risk m anagement assets and liabili ti es .

['233629.0', '25171.0', '9.28167']

['what was the net pension cost in 2018?', 'and in 2017?', 'combined, what was the total for these two years?', 'and in 2016?', 'combined, what was the total for these three years?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: note 8 2014 benefit plans the company has defined benefit pension plans covering certain employees in the united states and certain international locations . postretirement healthcare and life insurance benefits provided to qualifying domestic retirees as well as other postretirement benefit plans in international countries are not material . the measurement date used for the company 2019s employee benefit plans is september 30 . effective january 1 , 2018 , the legacy u.s . pension plan was frozen to limit the participation of employees who are hired or re-hired by the company , or who transfer employment to the company , on or after january 1 , net pension cost for the years ended september 30 included the following components: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions of dollars )</td><td>pension plans 2018</td><td>pension plans 2017</td><td>pension plans 2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>service cost</td><td>$ 136</td><td>$ 110</td><td>$ 81</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>interest cost</td><td>90</td><td>61</td><td>72</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>expected return on plan assets</td><td>-154 ( 154 )</td><td>-112 ( 112 )</td><td>-109 ( 109 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>amortization of prior service credit</td><td>-13 ( 13 )</td><td>-14 ( 14 )</td><td>-15 ( 15 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>amortization of loss</td><td>78</td><td>92</td><td>77</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>settlements</td><td>2</td><td>2014</td><td>7</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>net pension cost</td><td>$ 137</td><td>$ 138</td><td>$ 113</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>net pension cost included in the preceding table that is attributable to international plans</td><td>$ 34</td><td>$ 43</td><td>$ 35</td></tr></table> net pension cost included in the preceding table that is attributable to international plans $ 34 $ 43 $ 35 the amounts provided above for amortization of prior service credit and amortization of loss represent the reclassifications of prior service credits and net actuarial losses that were recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) in prior periods . the settlement losses recorded in 2018 and 2016 primarily included lump sum benefit payments associated with the company 2019s u.s . supplemental pension plan . the company recognizes pension settlements when payments from the supplemental plan exceed the sum of service and interest cost components of net periodic pension cost associated with this plan for the fiscal year. .

['137.0', '138.0', '275.0', '113.0', '388.0']

['what were revenues in 2007?', 'what were they in 2006?', 'what is the net difference?', 'what is the difference divided by the 2006 revenues?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: goodwill goodwill represents the excess of the solexa purchase price over the sum of the amounts assigned to assets acquired less liabilities assumed . the company believes that the acquisition of solexa will produce the following significant benefits : 2022 increased market presence and opportunities . the combination of the company and solexa should increase the combined company 2019s market presence and opportunities for growth in revenue , earnings and stockholder return . the company believes that the solexa technology is highly complementary to the company 2019s own portfolio of products and services and will enhance the company 2019s capabilities to service its existing customers , as well as accelerate the develop- ment of additional technologies , products and services . the company believes that integrating solexa 2019s capabilities with the company 2019s technologies will better position the company to address the emerging biomarker research and development and in-vitro and molecular diag- nostic markets . the company began to recognize revenue from products shipped as a result of this acquisition during the first quarter of 2007 . 2022 operating efficiencies . the combination of the company and solexa provides the opportunity for potential economies of scale and cost savings . the company believes that these primary factors support the amount of goodwill recognized as a result of the purchase price paid for solexa , in relation to other acquired tangible and intangible assets , including in-process research and development . the following unaudited pro forma information shows the results of the company 2019s operations for the specified reporting periods as though the acquisition had occurred as of the beginning of that period ( in thousands , except per share data ) : year ended december 30 , year ended december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>year ended december 30 2007</td><td>year ended december 31 2006</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>revenue</td><td>$ 366854</td><td>$ 187103</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net income ( loss )</td><td>$ 17388</td><td>$ -38957 ( 38957 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net income ( loss ) per share basic</td><td>$ 0.32</td><td>$ -0.68 ( 0.68 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net income ( loss ) per share diluted</td><td>$ 0.29</td><td>$ -0.68 ( 0.68 )</td></tr></table> the pro forma results have been prepared for comparative purposes only and are not necessarily indicative of the actual results of operations had the acquisition taken place as of the beginning of the periods presented , or the results that may occur in the future . the pro forma results exclude the $ 303.4 million non-cash acquired ipr&d charge recorded upon the closing of the acquisition during the first quarter of 2007 . investment in solexa on november 12 , 2006 , the company entered into a definitive securities purchase agreement with solexa in which the company invested approximately $ 50 million in solexa in exchange for 5154639 newly issued shares of solexa common stock in conjunction with the merger of the two companies . this investment was valued at $ 67.8 million as of december 31 , 2006 , which represented a market value of $ 13.15 per share of solexa common stock . this investment was eliminated as part of the company 2019s purchase accounting upon the closing of the merger on january 26 , 2007 . illumina , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .

['366854.0', '187103.0', '179751.0', '0.96071']

['what was the difference in shorewood net sales between 2005 and 2006?', 'and the value for 2005 again?', 'so what was the percentage reduction during this time?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: earnings for the first quarter of 2007 are expected to be lower than in the fourth quarter of 2006 . containerboard export sales volumes are expected to decline due to scheduled first-quarter main- tenance outages . sales volumes for u.s . converted products will be higher due to more shipping days , but expected softer demand should cause the ship- ments per day to decrease . average sales price real- izations are expected to be comparable to fourth- quarter averages . an additional containerboard price increase was announced in january that is expected to be fully realized in the second quarter . costs for wood , energy , starch , adhesives and freight are expected to increase . manufacturing costs will be higher due to costs associated with scheduled main- tenance outages in the containerboard mills . euro- pean container operating results are expected to improve as seasonally higher sales volumes and improved margins more than offset slightly higher manufacturing costs . consumer packaging demand and pricing for consumer packaging prod- ucts correlate closely with consumer spending and general economic activity . in addition to prices and volumes , major factors affecting the profitability of consumer packaging are raw material and energy costs , manufacturing efficiency and product mix . consumer packaging net sales increased 9% ( 9 % ) compared with 2005 and 7% ( 7 % ) compared with 2004 . operating profits rose 8% ( 8 % ) from 2005 , but declined 15% ( 15 % ) from 2004 levels . compared with 2005 , higher sales volumes ( $ 9 million ) , improved average sales price realizations ( $ 33 million ) , reduced lack-of-order downtime ( $ 18 million ) , and favorable mill oper- ations ( $ 25 million ) were partially offset by higher raw material costs ( $ 19 million ) and freight costs ( $ 21 million ) , unfavorable mix ( $ 14 million ) and other costs ( $ 21 million ) . consumer packaging in millions 2006 2005 2004 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>sales</td><td>$ 2455</td><td>$ 2245</td><td>$ 2295</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>$ 131</td><td>$ 121</td><td>$ 155</td></tr></table> coated paperboard net sales of $ 1.5 billion in 2006 were higher than $ 1.3 billion in 2005 and $ 1.1 billion in 2004 . sales volumes increased in 2006 compared with 2005 , particularly in the folding car- ton board segment , reflecting improved demand for coated paperboard products . in 2006 , our coated paperboard mills took 4000 tons of lack-of-order downtime , compared with 82000 tons of lack-of-order downtime in 2005 . average sales price realizations were substantially improved in the cur- rent year , principally for folding carton board and cupstock board . operating profits were 51% ( 51 % ) higher in 2006 than in 2005 , and 7% ( 7 % ) better than in 2004 . the impact of the higher sales prices along with more favorable manufacturing operations due to strong performance at the mills more than offset higher input costs for energy and freight . foodservice net sales declined to $ 396 million in 2006 , compared with $ 437 million in 2005 and $ 480 million in 2004 , due principally to the sale of the jackson , tennessee plant in july 2005 . sales vol- umes were lower in 2006 than in 2005 , although average sales prices were higher due to the realiza- tion of price increases implemented during 2005 . operating profits for 2006 improved over 2005 and 2004 levels largely due to the benefits from higher sales prices . raw material costs for bleached board were higher than in 2005 , but manufacturing costs were more favorable due to increased productivity and reduced waste . shorewood net sales of $ 670 million were down from $ 691 million in 2005 and $ 687 million in 2004 . sales volumes in 2006 were down from 2005 levels due to weak demand in the home entertainment and consumer products markets , although demand was strong in the tobacco segment . average sales prices for the year were lower than in 2005 . operating prof- its were down significantly from both 2005 and 2004 due to the decline in sales , particularly in the higher margin home entertainment markets , higher raw material costs for bleached board and certain inventory adjustment costs . entering 2007 , coated paperboard first-quarter sales volumes are expected to be seasonally stronger than in the fourth quarter 2006 for folding carton board and bristols . average sales price realizations are expected to rise with a price increase announced in january . it is anticipated that manufacturing costs will improve versus an unfavorable fourth quarter . foodservice earnings for the first quarter of 2007 are expected to decline due to seasonally weaker vol- ume . however , sales price realizations will be slightly higher , and the seasonal switch to hot cup contain- ers will have a favorable impact on product mix . shorewood sales volumes for the first quarter of 2007 are expected to seasonally decline , but the earnings impact will be partially offset by pricing improvements and an improved product mix . distribution our distribution business , principally represented by our xpedx business , markets a diverse array of products and supply chain services to customers in .

['-21.0', '691.0', '-0.03039']

['what was the total value of net operating loss carryforwards?', 'and how much do the net operating loss carryforwards related to state represent in relation to this total?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) at december 31 , 2005 , the company had net federal and state operating loss carryforwards available to reduce future taxable income of approximately $ 2.2 billion and $ 2.4 billion , respectively . if not utilized , the company 2019s net operating loss carryforwards expire as follows ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>years ended december 31,</td><td>federal</td><td>state</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2006 to 2010</td><td>$ 5248</td><td>$ 469747</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2011 to 2015</td><td>10012</td><td>272662</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2016 to 2020</td><td>397691</td><td>777707</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2021 to 2025</td><td>1744552</td><td>897896</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>$ 2157503</td><td>$ 2418012</td></tr></table> sfas no . 109 , 201caccounting for income taxes , 201d requires that companies record a valuation allowance when it is 201cmore likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized . 201d at december 31 , 2005 , the company has provided a valuation allowance of approximately $ 422.4 million , including approximately $ 249.5 million attributable to spectrasite , primarily related to net operating loss and capital loss carryforwards . approximately $ 237.8 million of the spectrasite valuation allowance was assumed as of the acquisition date . the balance of the valuation allowance primarily relates to net state deferred tax assets . the company has not provided a valuation allowance for the remaining deferred tax assets , primarily its federal net operating loss carryforwards , as management believes the company will have sufficient time to realize these federal net operating loss carryforwards during the twenty-year tax carryforward period . the company intends to recover a portion of its deferred tax asset through its federal income tax refund claims related to the carry back of certain federal net operating losses . in june 2003 and october 2003 , the company filed federal income tax refund claims with the irs relating to the carry back of $ 380.0 million of net operating losses generated prior to 2003 , of which the company initially anticipated receiving approximately $ 90.0 million . based on preliminary discussions with tax authorities , the company has revised its estimate of the net realizable value of the federal income tax refund claims and anticipates receiving a refund of approximately $ 65.0 million as a result of these claims by the end of 2006 . there can be no assurances , however , with respect to the specific amount and timing of any refund . the recoverability of the company 2019s remaining net deferred tax asset has been assessed utilizing stable state ( no growth ) projections based on its current operations . the projections show a significant decrease in depreciation and interest expense in the later years of the carryforward period as a result of a significant portion of its assets being fully depreciated during the first fifteen years of the carryforward period and debt repayments reducing interest expense . accordingly , the recoverability of the net deferred tax asset is not dependent on material improvements to operations , material asset sales or other non-routine transactions . based on its current outlook of future taxable income during the carryforward period , management believes that the net deferred tax asset will be realized . the realization of the company 2019s deferred tax assets as of december 31 , 2005 will be dependent upon its ability to generate approximately $ 1.3 billion in taxable income from january 1 , 2006 to december 31 , 2025 . if the company is unable to generate sufficient taxable income in the future , or carry back losses , as described above , it will be required to reduce its net deferred tax asset through a charge to income tax expense , which would result in a corresponding decrease in stockholders 2019 equity . from time to time the company is subject to examination by various tax authorities in jurisdictions in which the company has significant business operations . the company regularly assesses the likelihood of additional assessments in each of the tax jurisdictions resulting from these examinations . during the year ended .

['4575515.0', '0.52847']

['what was the total net revenue in 2017, in millions?', 'and what was the net revenue only in the us segment, also in millions?', 'what was, then, in millions of dollars, the total net revenue in 2017 without counting the us?', 'and how much is that in dollars?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: the aes corporation notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) december 31 , 2017 , 2016 , and 2015 on december 8 , 2017 , the board of directors declared a quarterly common stock dividend of $ 0.13 per share payable on february 15 , 2018 to shareholders of record at the close of business on february 1 , 2018 . stock repurchase program 2014 no shares were repurchased in 2017 . the cumulative repurchases from the commencement of the program in july 2010 through december 31 , 2017 totaled 154.3 million shares for a total cost of $ 1.9 billion , at an average price per share of $ 12.12 ( including a nominal amount of commissions ) . as of december 31 , 2017 , $ 246 million remained available for repurchase under the program . the common stock repurchased has been classified as treasury stock and accounted for using the cost method . a total of 155924785 and 156878891 shares were held as treasury stock at december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . restricted stock units under the company's employee benefit plans are issued from treasury stock . the company has not retired any common stock repurchased since it began the program in july 2010 . 15 . segments and geographic information the segment reporting structure uses the company's organizational structure as its foundation to reflect how the company manages the businesses internally and is organized by geographic regions which provides a socio- political-economic understanding of our business . during the third quarter of 2017 , the europe and asia sbus were merged in order to leverage scale and are now reported as part of the eurasia sbu . the management reporting structure is organized by five sbus led by our president and chief executive officer : us , andes , brazil , mcac and eurasia sbus . the company determined that it has five operating and five reportable segments corresponding to its sbus . all prior period results have been retrospectively revised to reflect the new segment reporting structure . in february 2018 , we announced a reorganization as a part of our ongoing strategy to simplify our portfolio , optimize our cost structure , and reduce our carbon intensity . the company is currently evaluating the impact this reorganization will have on our segment reporting structure . corporate and other 2014 corporate overhead costs which are not directly associated with the operations of our five reportable segments are included in "corporate and other." also included are certain intercompany charges such as self-insurance premiums which are fully eliminated in consolidation . the company uses adjusted ptc as its primary segment performance measure . adjusted ptc , a non-gaap measure , is defined by the company as pre-tax income from continuing operations attributable to the aes corporation excluding gains or losses of the consolidated entity due to ( a ) unrealized gains or losses related to derivative transactions ; ( b ) unrealized foreign currency gains or losses ; ( c ) gains , losses and associated benefits and costs due to dispositions and acquisitions of business interests , including early plant closures ; ( d ) losses due to impairments ; ( e ) gains , losses and costs due to the early retirement of debt ; and ( f ) costs directly associated with a major restructuring program , including , but not limited to , workforce reduction efforts , relocations , and office consolidation . adjusted ptc also includes net equity in earnings of affiliates on an after-tax basis adjusted for the same gains or losses excluded from consolidated entities . the company has concluded adjusted ptc better reflects the underlying business performance of the company and is the most relevant measure considered in the company's internal evaluation of the financial performance of its segments . additionally , given its large number of businesses and complexity , the company concluded that adjusted ptc is a more transparent measure that better assists investors in determining which businesses have the greatest impact on the company's results . revenue and adjusted ptc are presented before inter-segment eliminations , which includes the effect of intercompany transactions with other segments except for interest , charges for certain management fees , and the write-off of intercompany balances , as applicable . all intra-segment activity has been eliminated within the segment . inter-segment activity has been eliminated within the total consolidated results . the following tables present financial information by segment for the periods indicated ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year ended december 31,</td><td>total revenue 2017</td><td>total revenue 2016</td><td>total revenue 2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>us sbu</td><td>$ 3229</td><td>$ 3429</td><td>$ 3593</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>andes sbu</td><td>2710</td><td>2506</td><td>2489</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>brazil sbu</td><td>542</td><td>450</td><td>962</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>mcac sbu</td><td>2448</td><td>2172</td><td>2353</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>eurasia sbu</td><td>1590</td><td>1670</td><td>1875</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>corporate and other</td><td>35</td><td>77</td><td>31</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>eliminations</td><td>-24 ( 24 )</td><td>-23 ( 23 )</td><td>-43 ( 43 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>total revenue</td><td>$ 10530</td><td>$ 10281</td><td>$ 11260</td></tr></table> .

['10530.0', '3229.0', '7301.0', '7301000000.0']

['what was the total of operating expenses in 2018?', 'and what was it in 2017?', 'how much does the 2018 total of operating expenses represent in relation to this 2017 one?', 'and what is the difference between this value and the number one?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: income tax liabilities tax liabilities related to unrecognized tax benefits as of 30 september 2018 were $ 233.6 . these tax liabilities were excluded from the contractual obligations table as it is impractical to determine a cash impact by year given that payments will vary according to changes in tax laws , tax rates , and our operating results . in addition , there are uncertainties in timing of the effective settlement of our uncertain tax positions with respective taxing authorities . however , the contractual obligations table above includes our accrued liability of approximately $ 184 for deemed repatriation tax that is payable over eight years related to the tax act . refer to note 22 , income taxes , to the consolidated financial statements for additional information . obligation for future contribution to an equity affiliate on 19 april 2015 , a joint venture between air products and acwa holding entered into a 20-year oxygen and nitrogen supply agreement to supply saudi aramco 2019s oil refinery and power plant being built in jazan , saudi arabia . air products owns 25% ( 25 % ) of the joint venture and guarantees the repayment of its share of an equity bridge loan . in total , we expect to invest approximately $ 100 in this joint venture . as of 30 september 2018 , we recorded a noncurrent liability of $ 94.4 for our obligation to make future equity contributions in 2020 based on our proportionate share of the advances received by the joint venture under the loan . expected investment in joint venture on 12 august 2018 , air products entered an agreement to form a gasification/power joint venture ( "jv" ) with saudi aramco and acwa in jazan , saudi arabia . air products will own at least 55% ( 55 % ) of the jv , with saudi aramco and acwa power owning the balance . the jv will purchase the gasification assets , power block , and the associated utilities from saudi aramco for approximately $ 8 billion . our expected investment has been excluded from the contractual obligations table above pending closing , which is currently expected in fiscal year 2020 . the jv will own and operate the facility under a 25-year contract for a fixed monthly fee . saudi aramco will supply feedstock to the jv , and the jv will produce power , hydrogen and other utilities for saudi aramco . pension benefits the company and certain of its subsidiaries sponsor defined benefit pension plans and defined contribution plans that cover a substantial portion of its worldwide employees . the principal defined benefit pension plans are the u.s . salaried pension plan and the u.k . pension plan . these plans were closed to new participants in 2005 , after which defined contribution plans were offered to new employees . the shift to defined contribution plans is expected to continue to reduce volatility of both plan expense and contributions . the fair market value of plan assets for our defined benefit pension plans as of the 30 september 2018 measurement date decreased to $ 4273.1 from $ 4409.2 at the end of fiscal year 2017 . the projected benefit obligation for these plans was $ 4583.3 and $ 5107.2 at the end of fiscal years 2018 and 2017 , respectively . the net unfunded liability decreased $ 387.8 from $ 698.0 to $ 310.2 , primarily due to higher discount rates and favorable asset experience . refer to note 16 , retirement benefits , to the consolidated financial statements for comprehensive and detailed disclosures on our postretirement benefits . pension expense . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>pension expense 2013 continuing operations</td><td>$ 91.8</td><td>$ 72.0</td><td>$ 55.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>settlements termination benefits and curtailments ( included above )</td><td>48.9</td><td>15.0</td><td>6.0</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>weighted average discount rate 2013 service cost</td><td>3.2% ( 3.2 % )</td><td>2.9% ( 2.9 % )</td><td>4.1% ( 4.1 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>weighted average discount rate 2013 interest cost</td><td>2.9% ( 2.9 % )</td><td>2.5% ( 2.5 % )</td><td>3.4% ( 3.4 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>weighted average expected rate of return on plan assets</td><td>6.9% ( 6.9 % )</td><td>7.4% ( 7.4 % )</td><td>7.5% ( 7.5 % )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>weighted average expected rate of compensation increase</td><td>3.5% ( 3.5 % )</td><td>3.5% ( 3.5 % )</td><td>3.5% ( 3.5 % )</td></tr></table> .

['91.8', '72.0', '1.275', '0.275']

['what were operating revenues in 2002?', 'what is that times 1000?', 'what was the amount operating revenues increased in 2002?', 'what is the prior product less the amount operating revenues increased?', 'what is that over the amount operating revenues increased?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: entergy corporation and subsidiaries management's financial discussion and analysis the decrease in interest income in 2002 was primarily due to : fffd interest recognized in 2001 on grand gulf 1's decommissioning trust funds resulting from the final order addressing system energy's rate proceeding ; fffd interest recognized in 2001 at entergy mississippi and entergy new orleans on the deferred system energy costs that were not being recovered through rates ; and fffd lower interest earned on declining deferred fuel balances . the decrease in interest charges in 2002 is primarily due to : fffd a decrease of $ 31.9 million in interest on long-term debt primarily due to the retirement of long-term debt in late 2001 and early 2002 ; and fffd a decrease of $ 76.0 million in other interest expense primarily due to interest recorded on system energy's reserve for rate refund in 2001 . the refund was made in december 2001 . 2001 compared to 2000 results for the year ended december 31 , 2001 for u.s . utility were also affected by an increase in interest charges of $ 61.5 million primarily due to : fffd the final ferc order addressing the 1995 system energy rate filing ; fffd debt issued at entergy arkansas in july 2001 , at entergy gulf states in june 2000 and august 2001 , at entergy mississippi in january 2001 , and at entergy new orleans in july 2000 and february 2001 ; and fffd borrowings under credit facilities during 2001 , primarily at entergy arkansas . non-utility nuclear the increase in earnings in 2002 for non-utility nuclear from $ 128 million to $ 201 million was primarily due to the operation of indian point 2 and vermont yankee , which were purchased in september 2001 and july 2002 , respectively . the increase in earnings in 2001 for non-utility nuclear from $ 49 million to $ 128 million was primarily due to the operation of fitzpatrick and indian point 3 for a full year , as each was purchased in november 2000 , and the operation of indian point 2 , which was purchased in september 2001 . following are key performance measures for non-utility nuclear: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2002</td><td>2001</td><td>2000</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net mw in operation at december 31</td><td>3955</td><td>3445</td><td>2475</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>generation in gwh for the year</td><td>29953</td><td>22614</td><td>7171</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>capacity factor for the year</td><td>93% ( 93 % )</td><td>93% ( 93 % )</td><td>94% ( 94 % )</td></tr></table> 2002 compared to 2001 the following fluctuations in the results of operations for non-utility nuclear in 2002 were primarily caused by the acquisitions of indian point 2 and vermont yankee ( except as otherwise noted ) : fffd operating revenues increased $ 411.0 million to $ 1.2 billion ; fffd other operation and maintenance expenses increased $ 201.8 million to $ 596.3 million ; fffd depreciation and amortization expenses increased $ 25.1 million to $ 42.8 million ; fffd fuel expenses increased $ 29.4 million to $ 105.2 million ; fffd nuclear refueling outage expenses increased $ 23.9 million to $ 46.8 million , which was due primarily to a .

['1.2', '1200.0', '411.0', '789.0', '1.91971']

['what is the value of the afs investment securities in 2018?', 'what is the value in 2017?', 'what is the sum?', 'what is the value of the afs investment securities in 2016?', 'what is the total sum?', 'what is that divided by 3?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: management 2019s discussion and analysis 78 jpmorgan chase & co./2018 form 10-k treasury and cio overview treasury and cio is predominantly responsible for measuring , monitoring , reporting and managing the firm 2019s liquidity , funding , capital , structural interest rate and foreign exchange risks . the risks managed by treasury and cio arise from the activities undertaken by the firm 2019s four major reportable business segments to serve their respective client bases , which generate both on- and off- balance sheet assets and liabilities . treasury and cio seek to achieve the firm 2019s asset-liability management objectives generally by investing in high- quality securities that are managed for the longer-term as part of the firm 2019s investment securities portfolio . treasury and cio also use derivatives to meet the firm 2019s asset- liability management objectives . for further information on derivatives , refer to note 5 . in addition , treasury and cio manage the firm 2019s cash position primarily through depositing at central banks and investing in short-term instruments . for further information on liquidity and funding risk , refer to liquidity risk management on pages 95 2013100 . for information on interest rate , foreign exchange and other risks , refer to market risk management on pages 124 2013131 . the investment securities portfolio primarily consists of agency and nonagency mortgage-backed securities , u.s . and non-u.s . government securities , obligations of u.s . states and municipalities , other abs and corporate debt securities . at december 31 , 2018 , the investment securities portfolio was $ 260.1 billion , and the average credit rating of the securities comprising the portfolio was aa+ ( based upon external ratings where available and , where not available , based primarily upon internal ratings that correspond to ratings as defined by s&p and moody 2019s ) . refer to note 10 for further information on the firm 2019s investment securities portfolio . selected income statement and balance sheet data as of or for the year ended december 31 , ( in millions ) 2018 2017 2016 investment securities gains/ ( losses ) $ ( 395 ) $ ( 78 ) $ 132 available-for-sale ( 201cafs 201d ) investment securities ( average ) 203449 219345 226892 held-to-maturity ( 201chtm 201d ) investment securities ( average ) 31747 47927 51358 investment securities portfolio ( average ) 235197 267272 278250 afs investment securities ( period-end ) 228681 200247 236670 htm investment securities ( period-end ) 31434 47733 50168 investment securities portfolio ( period 2013end ) 260115 247980 286838 as permitted by the new hedge accounting guidance , the firm elected to transfer certain investment securities from htm to afs in the first quarter of 2018 . for additional information , refer to notes 1 and 10. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>as of or for the year ended december 31 ( in millions )</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>investment securities gains/ ( losses )</td><td>$ -395 ( 395 )</td><td>$ -78 ( 78 )</td><td>$ 132</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>available-for-sale ( 201cafs 201d ) investment securities ( average )</td><td>203449</td><td>219345</td><td>226892</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>held-to-maturity ( 201chtm 201d ) investment securities ( average )</td><td>31747</td><td>47927</td><td>51358</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>investment securities portfolio ( average )</td><td>235197</td><td>267272</td><td>278250</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>afs investment securities ( period-end )</td><td>228681</td><td>200247</td><td>236670</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>htm investment securities ( period-end )</td><td>31434</td><td>47733</td><td>50168</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>investment securities portfolio ( period 2013end )</td><td>260115</td><td>247980</td><td>286838</td></tr></table> management 2019s discussion and analysis 78 jpmorgan chase & co./2018 form 10-k treasury and cio overview treasury and cio is predominantly responsible for measuring , monitoring , reporting and managing the firm 2019s liquidity , funding , capital , structural interest rate and foreign exchange risks . the risks managed by treasury and cio arise from the activities undertaken by the firm 2019s four major reportable business segments to serve their respective client bases , which generate both on- and off- balance sheet assets and liabilities . treasury and cio seek to achieve the firm 2019s asset-liability management objectives generally by investing in high- quality securities that are managed for the longer-term as part of the firm 2019s investment securities portfolio . treasury and cio also use derivatives to meet the firm 2019s asset- liability management objectives . for further information on derivatives , refer to note 5 . in addition , treasury and cio manage the firm 2019s cash position primarily through depositing at central banks and investing in short-term instruments . for further information on liquidity and funding risk , refer to liquidity risk management on pages 95 2013100 . for information on interest rate , foreign exchange and other risks , refer to market risk management on pages 124 2013131 . the investment securities portfolio primarily consists of agency and nonagency mortgage-backed securities , u.s . and non-u.s . government securities , obligations of u.s . states and municipalities , other abs and corporate debt securities . at december 31 , 2018 , the investment securities portfolio was $ 260.1 billion , and the average credit rating of the securities comprising the portfolio was aa+ ( based upon external ratings where available and , where not available , based primarily upon internal ratings that correspond to ratings as defined by s&p and moody 2019s ) . refer to note 10 for further information on the firm 2019s investment securities portfolio . selected income statement and balance sheet data as of or for the year ended december 31 , ( in millions ) 2018 2017 2016 investment securities gains/ ( losses ) $ ( 395 ) $ ( 78 ) $ 132 available-for-sale ( 201cafs 201d ) investment securities ( average ) 203449 219345 226892 held-to-maturity ( 201chtm 201d ) investment securities ( average ) 31747 47927 51358 investment securities portfolio ( average ) 235197 267272 278250 afs investment securities ( period-end ) 228681 200247 236670 htm investment securities ( period-end ) 31434 47733 50168 investment securities portfolio ( period 2013end ) 260115 247980 286838 as permitted by the new hedge accounting guidance , the firm elected to transfer certain investment securities from htm to afs in the first quarter of 2018 . for additional information , refer to notes 1 and 10. .

['228681.0', '200247.0', '428928.0', '236670.0', '665598.0', '221866.0']

['by what amount did the net earnings attributable to pmi decrease over the year, in millions?', 'and what percentage of those net earnings in the previous year is represented by this amount?', 'considering, then, this decrease amount and the percentage of the net earnings it represents, what was the total of those net earnings in the previous year, in millions?', 'and how much is that in billions?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: net revenues include $ 3.8 billion in 2017 and $ 739 million in 2016 related to the sale of rrps , mainly driven by japan . these net revenue amounts include excise taxes billed to customers . excluding excise taxes , net revenues for rrps were $ 3.6 billion in 2017 and $ 733 million in 2016 . in some jurisdictions , including japan , we are not responsible for collecting excise taxes . in 2017 , approximately $ 0.9 billion of our $ 3.6 billion in rrp net revenues , excluding excise taxes , were from iqos devices and accessories . excise taxes on products increased by $ 1.1 billion , due to : 2022 higher excise taxes resulting from changes in retail prices and tax rates ( $ 4.6 billion ) , partially offset by 2022 favorable currency ( $ 1.9 billion ) and 2022 lower excise taxes resulting from volume/mix ( $ 1.6 billion ) . our cost of sales ; marketing , administration and research costs ; and operating income were as follows : for the years ended december 31 , variance . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>for the years ended december 31 , 2017</td><td>for the years ended december 31 , 2016</td><td>for the years ended december 31 , $</td><td>% ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cost of sales</td><td>$ 10432</td><td>$ 9391</td><td>$ 1041</td><td>11.1% ( 11.1 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>marketing administration and research costs</td><td>6725</td><td>6405</td><td>320</td><td>5.0% ( 5.0 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating income</td><td>11503</td><td>10815</td><td>688</td><td>6.4% ( 6.4 % )</td></tr></table> cost of sales increased by $ 1.0 billion , due to : 2022 higher cost of sales resulting from volume/mix ( $ 1.1 billion ) , partly offset by 2022 lower manufacturing costs ( $ 36 million ) and 2022 favorable currency ( $ 30 million ) . marketing , administration and research costs increased by $ 320 million , due to : 2022 higher expenses ( $ 570 million , largely reflecting increased investment behind reduced-risk products , predominately in the european union and asia ) , partly offset by 2022 favorable currency ( $ 250 million ) . operating income increased by $ 688 million , due primarily to : 2022 price increases ( $ 1.4 billion ) , partly offset by 2022 higher marketing , administration and research costs ( $ 570 million ) and 2022 unfavorable currency ( $ 157 million ) . interest expense , net , of $ 914 million increased by $ 23 million , due primarily to unfavorably currency and higher average debt levels , partly offset by higher interest income . our effective tax rate increased by 12.8 percentage points to 40.7% ( 40.7 % ) . the 2017 effective tax rate was unfavorably impacted by $ 1.6 billion due to the tax cuts and jobs act . for further details , see item 8 , note 11 . income taxes to our consolidated financial statements . we are continuing to evaluate the impact that the tax cuts and jobs act will have on our tax liability . based upon our current interpretation of the tax cuts and jobs act , we estimate that our 2018 effective tax rate will be approximately 28% ( 28 % ) , subject to future regulatory developments and earnings mix by taxing jurisdiction . we are regularly examined by tax authorities around the world , and we are currently under examination in a number of jurisdictions . it is reasonably possible that within the next 12 months certain tax examinations will close , which could result in a change in unrecognized tax benefits along with related interest and penalties . an estimate of any possible change cannot be made at this time . net earnings attributable to pmi of $ 6.0 billion decreased by $ 932 million ( 13.4% ( 13.4 % ) ) . this decrease was due primarily to a higher effective tax rate as discussed above , partly offset by higher operating income . diluted and basic eps of $ 3.88 decreased by 13.4% ( 13.4 % ) . excluding .

['932.0', '0.134', '6955.22388', '6.95522']

['in the year of 2007, what was the net income as a portion of the revenue?', 'and what was the change in that net income since 2006?', 'what percentage does this change represent in relation to the 2006 net income?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: goodwill goodwill represents the excess of the solexa purchase price over the sum of the amounts assigned to assets acquired less liabilities assumed . the company believes that the acquisition of solexa will produce the following significant benefits : 2022 increased market presence and opportunities . the combination of the company and solexa should increase the combined company 2019s market presence and opportunities for growth in revenue , earnings and stockholder return . the company believes that the solexa technology is highly complementary to the company 2019s own portfolio of products and services and will enhance the company 2019s capabilities to service its existing customers , as well as accelerate the develop- ment of additional technologies , products and services . the company believes that integrating solexa 2019s capabilities with the company 2019s technologies will better position the company to address the emerging biomarker research and development and in-vitro and molecular diag- nostic markets . the company began to recognize revenue from products shipped as a result of this acquisition during the first quarter of 2007 . 2022 operating efficiencies . the combination of the company and solexa provides the opportunity for potential economies of scale and cost savings . the company believes that these primary factors support the amount of goodwill recognized as a result of the purchase price paid for solexa , in relation to other acquired tangible and intangible assets , including in-process research and development . the following unaudited pro forma information shows the results of the company 2019s operations for the specified reporting periods as though the acquisition had occurred as of the beginning of that period ( in thousands , except per share data ) : year ended december 30 , year ended december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>year ended december 30 2007</td><td>year ended december 31 2006</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>revenue</td><td>$ 366854</td><td>$ 187103</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net income ( loss )</td><td>$ 17388</td><td>$ -38957 ( 38957 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net income ( loss ) per share basic</td><td>$ 0.32</td><td>$ -0.68 ( 0.68 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net income ( loss ) per share diluted</td><td>$ 0.29</td><td>$ -0.68 ( 0.68 )</td></tr></table> the pro forma results have been prepared for comparative purposes only and are not necessarily indicative of the actual results of operations had the acquisition taken place as of the beginning of the periods presented , or the results that may occur in the future . the pro forma results exclude the $ 303.4 million non-cash acquired ipr&d charge recorded upon the closing of the acquisition during the first quarter of 2007 . investment in solexa on november 12 , 2006 , the company entered into a definitive securities purchase agreement with solexa in which the company invested approximately $ 50 million in solexa in exchange for 5154639 newly issued shares of solexa common stock in conjunction with the merger of the two companies . this investment was valued at $ 67.8 million as of december 31 , 2006 , which represented a market value of $ 13.15 per share of solexa common stock . this investment was eliminated as part of the company 2019s purchase accounting upon the closing of the merger on january 26 , 2007 . illumina , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .

['0.0474', '56345.0', '1.44634']

['as of december 31, 2008, what was the amount of the accrued wages and vacation?', 'and what was the total of accounts payable and other current liabilities?', 'what percentage, then, did that amount represent in relation to this total?', 'and from 2007 to that year, what was the change in the total of equipment rents payable?', 'what is this change as a percentage of that total in 2007?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: when we purchase an asset , we capitalize all costs necessary to make the asset ready for its intended use . however , many of our assets are self-constructed . a large portion of our capital expenditures is for track structure expansion ( capacity projects ) and replacement ( program projects ) , which is typically performed by our employees . approximately 13% ( 13 % ) of our full-time equivalent employees are dedicated to the construction of capital assets . costs that are directly attributable or overhead costs that relate directly to capital projects are capitalized . direct costs that are capitalized as part of self-constructed assets include material , labor , and work equipment . indirect costs are capitalized if they clearly relate to the construction of the asset . these costs are allocated using appropriate statistical bases . the capitalization of indirect costs is consistent with fasb statement no . 67 , accounting for costs and initial rental operations of real estate projects . general and administrative expenditures are expensed as incurred . normal repairs and maintenance are also expensed as incurred , while costs incurred that extend the useful life of an asset , improve the safety of our operations or improve operating efficiency are capitalized . assets held under capital leases are recorded at the lower of the net present value of the minimum lease payments or the fair value of the leased asset at the inception of the lease . amortization expense is computed using the straight-line method over the shorter of the estimated useful lives of the assets or the period of the related lease . 10 . accounts payable and other current liabilities dec . 31 , dec . 31 , millions of dollars 2008 2007 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions of dollars</td><td>dec . 31 2008</td><td>dec . 31 2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>accounts payable</td><td>$ 629</td><td>$ 732</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>accrued wages and vacation</td><td>367</td><td>394</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>accrued casualty costs</td><td>390</td><td>371</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>income and other taxes</td><td>207</td><td>343</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>dividends and interest</td><td>328</td><td>284</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>equipment rents payable</td><td>93</td><td>103</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>other</td><td>546</td><td>675</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>total accounts payable and other current liabilities</td><td>$ 2560</td><td>$ 2902</td></tr></table> 11 . fair value measurements during the first quarter of 2008 , we fully adopted fasb statement no . 157 , fair value measurements ( fas 157 ) . fas 157 established a framework for measuring fair value and expanded disclosures about fair value measurements . the adoption of fas 157 had no impact on our financial position or results of operations . fas 157 applies to all assets and liabilities that are measured and reported on a fair value basis . this enables the reader of the financial statements to assess the inputs used to develop those measurements by establishing a hierarchy for ranking the quality and reliability of the information used to determine fair values . the statement requires that each asset and liability carried at fair value be classified into one of the following categories : level 1 : quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities . level 2 : observable market based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data . level 3 : unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data. .

['367.0', '2560.0', '0.14336', '-10.0', '-0.09709']

['between 2016 and 2017, what was the variation in the credit net?', 'and what was that credit net in 2016?', 'what was, then, that variation as a percent of this 2016 amount?', 'and in that same period, what was that variation for the net comodities?', 'and what percentage did this variation represent in relation to the 2016 commodities?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: the goldman sachs group , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements in the tables above : 2030 the gross fair values exclude the effects of both counterparty netting and collateral netting , and therefore are not representative of the firm 2019s exposure . 2030 counterparty netting is reflected in each level to the extent that receivable and payable balances are netted within the same level and is included in counterparty netting in levels . where the counterparty netting is across levels , the netting is included in cross-level counterparty netting . 2030 derivative assets are shown as positive amounts and derivative liabilities are shown as negative amounts . significant unobservable inputs the table below presents the amount of level 3 assets ( liabilities ) , and ranges , averages and medians of significant unobservable inputs used to value the firm 2019s level 3 derivatives . level 3 assets ( liabilities ) and range of significant unobservable inputs ( average/median ) as of december $ in millions 2017 2016 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>$ in millions</td><td>level 3 assets ( liabilities ) and range of significant unobservable inputs ( average/median ) as of december 2017</td><td>level 3 assets ( liabilities ) and range of significant unobservable inputs ( average/median ) as of december 2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>interest rates net</td><td>$ -410 ( 410 )</td><td>$ -381 ( 381 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>correlation</td><td>( 10 ) % ( % ) to 95% ( 95 % ) ( 71%/79% ( 71%/79 % ) )</td><td>( 10 ) % ( % ) to 86% ( 86 % ) ( 56%/60% ( 56%/60 % ) )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>volatility ( bps )</td><td>31 to 150 ( 84/78 )</td><td>31 to 151 ( 84/57 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>credit net</td><td>$ 1505</td><td>$ 2504</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>correlation</td><td>28% ( 28 % ) to 84% ( 84 % ) ( 61%/60% ( 61%/60 % ) )</td><td>35% ( 35 % ) to 91% ( 91 % ) ( 65%/68% ( 65%/68 % ) )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>credit spreads ( bps )</td><td>1 to 633 ( 69/42 )</td><td>1 to 993 ( 122/73 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>upfront credit points</td><td>0 to 97 ( 42/38 )</td><td>0 to 100 ( 43/35 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>recovery rates</td><td>22% ( 22 % ) to 73% ( 73 % ) ( 68%/73% ( 68%/73 % ) )</td><td>1% ( 1 % ) to 97% ( 97 % ) ( 58%/70% ( 58%/70 % ) )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>currencies net</td><td>$ -181 ( 181 )</td><td>$ 3</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>correlation</td><td>49% ( 49 % ) to 72% ( 72 % ) ( 61%/62% ( 61%/62 % ) )</td><td>25% ( 25 % ) to 70% ( 70 % ) ( 50%/55% ( 50%/55 % ) )</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>commodities net</td><td>$ 47</td><td>$ 73</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>volatility</td><td>9% ( 9 % ) to 79% ( 79 % ) ( 24%/24% ( 24%/24 % ) )</td><td>13% ( 13 % ) to 68% ( 68 % ) ( 33%/33% ( 33%/33 % ) )</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>natural gas spread</td><td>$ ( 2.38 ) to $ 3.34 ( $ ( 0.22 ) /$ ( 0.12 ) )</td><td>$ ( 1.81 ) to $ 4.33 ( $ ( 0.14 ) /$ ( 0.05 ) )</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>oil spread</td><td>$ ( 2.86 ) to $ 23.61 ( $ 6.47/$ 2.35 )</td><td>$ ( 19.72 ) to $ 64.92 ( $ 25.30/$ 16.43 )</td></tr><tr><td>16</td><td>equities net</td><td>$ -1249 ( 1249 )</td><td>$ -3416 ( 3416 )</td></tr><tr><td>17</td><td>correlation</td><td>( 36 ) % ( % ) to 94% ( 94 % ) ( 50%/52% ( 50%/52 % ) )</td><td>( 39 ) % ( % ) to 88% ( 88 % ) ( 41%/41% ( 41%/41 % ) )</td></tr><tr><td>18</td><td>volatility</td><td>4% ( 4 % ) to 72% ( 72 % ) ( 24%/22% ( 24%/22 % ) )</td><td>5% ( 5 % ) to 72% ( 72 % ) ( 24%/23% ( 24%/23 % ) )</td></tr></table> in the table above : 2030 derivative assets are shown as positive amounts and derivative liabilities are shown as negative amounts . 2030 ranges represent the significant unobservable inputs that were used in the valuation of each type of derivative . 2030 averages represent the arithmetic average of the inputs and are not weighted by the relative fair value or notional of the respective financial instruments . an average greater than the median indicates that the majority of inputs are below the average . for example , the difference between the average and the median for credit spreads and oil spread inputs indicates that the majority of the inputs fall in the lower end of the range . 2030 the ranges , averages and medians of these inputs are not representative of the appropriate inputs to use when calculating the fair value of any one derivative . for example , the highest correlation for interest rate derivatives is appropriate for valuing a specific interest rate derivative but may not be appropriate for valuing any other interest rate derivative . accordingly , the ranges of inputs do not represent uncertainty in , or possible ranges of , fair value measurements of the firm 2019s level 3 derivatives . 2030 interest rates , currencies and equities derivatives are valued using option pricing models , credit derivatives are valued using option pricing , correlation and discounted cash flow models , and commodities derivatives are valued using option pricing and discounted cash flow models . 2030 the fair value of any one instrument may be determined using multiple valuation techniques . for example , option pricing models and discounted cash flows models are typically used together to determine fair value . therefore , the level 3 balance encompasses both of these techniques . 2030 correlation within currencies and equities includes cross- product type correlation . 2030 natural gas spread represents the spread per million british thermal units of natural gas . 2030 oil spread represents the spread per barrel of oil and refined products . range of significant unobservable inputs the following is information about the ranges of significant unobservable inputs used to value the firm 2019s level 3 derivative instruments : 2030 correlation . ranges for correlation cover a variety of underliers both within one product type ( e.g. , equity index and equity single stock names ) and across product types ( e.g. , correlation of an interest rate and a currency ) , as well as across regions . generally , cross-product type correlation inputs are used to value more complex instruments and are lower than correlation inputs on assets within the same derivative product type . 2030 volatility . ranges for volatility cover numerous underliers across a variety of markets , maturities and strike prices . for example , volatility of equity indices is generally lower than volatility of single stocks . 2030 credit spreads , upfront credit points and recovery rates . the ranges for credit spreads , upfront credit points and recovery rates cover a variety of underliers ( index and single names ) , regions , sectors , maturities and credit qualities ( high-yield and investment-grade ) . the broad range of this population gives rise to the width of the ranges of significant unobservable inputs . 130 goldman sachs 2017 form 10-k .

['-999.0', '2504.0', '-0.39896', '-26.0', '-0.35616']

['what is the difference in segment revenue from 2008 to 2009?', 'what is the 2008 value?', 'what is the net change over the 2008 value?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: of exiting a business in japan , economic weakness in asia and political unrest in thailand , partially offset by growth in new zealand and certain emerging markets . reinsurance commissions , fees and other revenue increased 48% ( 48 % ) , due mainly to the benfield merger , partially offset by unfavorable foreign currency translation . organic revenue is even with 2008 , as growth in domestic treaty business and slightly higher pricing was offset by greater client retention , and declines in investment banking and facultative placements . operating income operating income increased $ 54 million or 6% ( 6 % ) from 2008 to $ 900 million in 2009 . in 2009 , operating income margins in this segment were 14.3% ( 14.3 % ) , up 60 basis points from 13.7% ( 13.7 % ) in 2008 . contributing to increased operating income and margins were the merger with benfield , lower e&o costs due to insurance recoveries , a pension curtailment gain of $ 54 million in 2009 versus a curtailment loss of $ 6 million in 2008 , declines in anti-corruption and compliance initiative costs of $ 35 million , restructuring savings , and other cost savings initiatives . these items were partially offset by an increase of $ 140 million in restructuring costs , $ 95 million of lower fiduciary investment income , benfield integration costs and higher amortization of intangible assets obtained in the merger , and unfavorable foreign currency translation . consulting . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>years ended december 31,</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>segment revenue</td><td>$ 1267</td><td>$ 1356</td><td>$ 1345</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>segment operating income</td><td>203</td><td>208</td><td>180</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>segment operating income margin</td><td>16.0% ( 16.0 % )</td><td>15.3% ( 15.3 % )</td><td>13.4% ( 13.4 % )</td></tr></table> our consulting segment generated 17% ( 17 % ) of our consolidated total revenues in 2009 and provides a broad range of human capital consulting services , as follows : consulting services : 1 . health and benefits advises clients about how to structure , fund , and administer employee benefit programs that attract , retain , and motivate employees . benefits consulting include health and welfare , executive benefits , workforce strategies and productivity , absence management , benefits administration , data-driven health , compliance , employee commitment , investment advisory and elective benefits services . 2 . retirement specializes in global actuarial services , defined contribution consulting , investment consulting , tax and erisa consulting , and pension administration . 3 . compensation focuses on compensatory advisory/counsel including : compensation planning design , executive reward strategies , salary survey and benchmarking , market share studies and sales force effectiveness , with special expertise in the financial services and technology industries . 4 . strategic human capital delivers advice to complex global organizations on talent , change and organizational effectiveness issues , including talent strategy and acquisition , executive on-boarding , performance management , leadership assessment and development , communication strategy , workforce training and change management . outsourcing offers employment processing , performance improvement , benefits administration and other employment-related services . beginning in late 2008 and continuing throughout 2009 , the disruption in the global credit markets and the deterioration of the financial markets has created significant uncertainty in the marketplace . the prolonged economic downturn is adversely impacting our clients 2019 financial condition and the levels of business activities in the industries and geographies where we operate . while we believe that the majority of our practices are well positioned to manage through this time , these challenges are reducing demand for some of our services and depressing the price of those services , which is having an adverse effect on our new business and results of operations. .

['-89.0', '1356.0', '-0.06563']

['what is the increased rent after five years?', 'and the base rental during the first five years?', 'so what was the difference between these two values?', 'and the growth rate of this value?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: used to refinance certain indebtedness which matured in the fourth quarter of 2014 . interest is payable semi-annually in arrears on march 18 and september 18 of each year , or approximately $ 35 million per year . the 2024 notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price . the unamortized discount and debt issuance costs are being amortized over the remaining term of the 2024 notes . 2022 notes . in may 2012 , the company issued $ 1.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured unsubordinated obligations . these notes were issued as two separate series of senior debt securities , including $ 750 million of 1.375% ( 1.375 % ) notes , which were repaid in june 2015 at maturity , and $ 750 million of 3.375% ( 3.375 % ) notes maturing in june 2022 ( the 201c2022 notes 201d ) . net proceeds were used to fund the repurchase of blackrock 2019s common stock and series b preferred from barclays and affiliates and for general corporate purposes . interest on the 2022 notes of approximately $ 25 million per year is payable semi-annually on june 1 and december 1 of each year . the 2022 notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price . the 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price represents a price , subject to the specific terms of the 2022 notes and related indenture , that is the greater of ( a ) par value and ( b ) the present value of future payments that will not be paid because of an early redemption , which is discounted at a fixed spread over a comparable treasury security . the unamortized discount and debt issuance costs are being amortized over the remaining term of the 2022 notes . 2021 notes . in may 2011 , the company issued $ 1.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured unsubordinated obligations . these notes were issued as two separate series of senior debt securities , including $ 750 million of 4.25% ( 4.25 % ) notes maturing in may 2021 and $ 750 million of floating rate notes , which were repaid in may 2013 at maturity . net proceeds of this offering were used to fund the repurchase of blackrock 2019s series b preferred from affiliates of merrill lynch & co. , inc . interest on the 4.25% ( 4.25 % ) notes due in 2021 ( 201c2021 notes 201d ) is payable semi-annually on may 24 and november 24 of each year , and is approximately $ 32 million per year . the 2021 notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price . the unamortized discount and debt issuance costs are being amortized over the remaining term of the 2021 notes . 2019 notes . in december 2009 , the company issued $ 2.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured and unsubordinated obligations . these notes were issued as three separate series of senior debt securities including $ 0.5 billion of 2.25% ( 2.25 % ) notes , which were repaid in december 2012 , $ 1.0 billion of 3.50% ( 3.50 % ) notes , which were repaid in december 2014 at maturity , and $ 1.0 billion of 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) notes maturing in december 2019 ( the 201c2019 notes 201d ) . net proceeds of this offering were used to repay borrowings under the cp program , which was used to finance a portion of the acquisition of barclays global investors from barclays on december 1 , 2009 , and for general corporate purposes . interest on the 2019 notes of approximately $ 50 million per year is payable semi-annually in arrears on june 10 and december 10 of each year . these notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price . the unamortized discount and debt issuance costs are being amortized over the remaining term of the 2019 notes . 13 . commitments and contingencies operating lease commitments the company leases its primary office spaces under agreements that expire through 2043 . future minimum commitments under these operating leases are as follows : ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year</td><td>amount</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2018</td><td>141</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2019</td><td>132</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2020</td><td>126</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2021</td><td>118</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2022</td><td>109</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>thereafter</td><td>1580</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>$ 2206</td></tr></table> in may 2017 , the company entered into an agreement with 50 hymc owner llc , for the lease of approximately 847000 square feet of office space located at 50 hudson yards , new york , new york . the term of the lease is twenty years from the date that rental payments begin , expected to occur in may 2023 , with the option to renew for a specified term . the lease requires annual base rental payments of approximately $ 51 million per year during the first five years of the lease term , increasing every five years to $ 58 million , $ 66 million and $ 74 million per year ( or approximately $ 1.2 billion in base rent over its twenty-year term ) . this lease is classified as an operating lease and , as such , is not recorded as a liability on the consolidated statements of financial condition . rent expense and certain office equipment expense under lease agreements amounted to $ 132 million , $ 134 million and $ 136 million in 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . investment commitments . at december 31 , 2017 , the company had $ 298 million of various capital commitments to fund sponsored investment funds , including consolidated vies . these funds include private equity funds , real assets funds , and opportunistic funds . this amount excludes additional commitments made by consolidated funds of funds to underlying third-party funds as third-party noncontrolling interest holders have the legal obligation to fund the respective commitments of such funds of funds . generally , the timing of the funding of these commitments is unknown and the commitments are callable on demand at any time prior to the expiration of the commitment . these unfunded commitments are not recorded on the consolidated statements of financial condition . these commitments do not include potential future commitments approved by the company that are not yet legally binding . the company intends to make additional capital commitments from time to time to fund additional investment products for , and with , its clients . contingencies contingent payments related to business acquisitions . in connection with certain acquisitions , blackrock is required to make contingent payments , subject to achieving specified performance targets , which may include revenue related to acquired contracts or new capital commitments for certain products . the fair value of the remaining aggregate contingent payments at december 31 , 2017 totaled $ 236 million , including $ 128 million related to the first reserve transaction , and is included in other liabilities on the consolidated statements of financial condition. .

['58.0', '51.0', '7.0', '0.13725']

['in the year of 2011, how much did the mutual funds represent in relation to the total investment?', 'and from 2010 to that year, what was the change in that investment?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: contingent consideration of up to $ 13.8 million . the contingent consideration arrangement requires additional cash payments to the former equity holders of lyric upon the achievement of certain technological and product development milestones payable during the period from june 2011 through june 2016 . the company estimated the fair value of the contingent consideration arrangement utilizing the income approach . changes in the fair value of the contingent consideration subsequent to the acquisition date primarily driven by assumptions pertaining to the achievement of the defined milestones will be recognized in operating income in the period of the estimated fair value change . as of october 29 , 2011 , no contingent payments have been made and the fair value of the contingent consideration was approximately $ 14.0 million . the company allocated the purchase price to the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values at the date of acquisition , resulting in the recognition of $ 12.2 million of ipr&d , $ 18.9 million of goodwill and $ 3.3 million of net deferred tax liabilities . the goodwill recognized is attributable to future technologies that have yet to be determined as well as the assembled workforce of lyric . future technologies do not meet the criteria for recognition separately from goodwill because they are a part of future development and growth of the business . none of the goodwill is expected to be deductible for tax purposes . in addition , the company will be obligated to pay royalties to the former equity holders of lyric on revenue recognized from the sale of lyric products and licenses through the earlier of 20 years or the accrual of a maximum of $ 25 million . royalty payments to lyric employees require post-acquisition services to be rendered and , as such , the company will record these amounts as compensation expense in the related periods . as of october 29 , 2011 , no royalty payments have been made . the company recognized $ 0.2 million of acquisition-related costs that were expensed in the third quarter of fiscal 2011 . these costs are included in operating expenses in the consolidated statement of income . the company has not provided pro forma results of operations for integrant , audioasics and lyric herein as they were not material to the company on either an individual or an aggregate basis . the company included the results of operations of each acquisition in its consolidated statement of income from the date of such acquisition . 7 . deferred compensation plan investments investments in the analog devices , inc . deferred compensation plan ( the deferred compensation plan ) are classified as trading . the components of the investments as of october 29 , 2011 and october 30 , 2010 were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>money market funds</td><td>$ 17187</td><td>$ 1840</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>mutual funds</td><td>9223</td><td>6850</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total deferred compensation plan investments</td><td>$ 26410</td><td>$ 8690</td></tr></table> the fair values of these investments are based on published market quotes on october 29 , 2011 and october 30 , 2010 , respectively . adjustments to the fair value of , and income pertaining to , deferred compensation plan investments are recorded in operating expenses . gross realized and unrealized gains and losses from trading securities were not material in fiscal 2011 , 2010 or 2009 . the company has recorded a corresponding liability for amounts owed to the deferred compensation plan participants ( see note 10 ) . these investments are specifically designated as available to the company solely for the purpose of paying benefits under the deferred compensation plan . however , in the event the company became insolvent , the investments would be available to all unsecured general creditors . 8 . other investments other investments consist of equity securities and other long-term investments . investments are stated at fair value , which is based on market quotes or on a cost-basis , dependent on the nature of the investment , as appropriate . adjustments to the fair value of investments classified as available-for-sale are recorded as an increase or decrease analog devices , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .

['0.65078', '17720.0']

['what were the annual cash dividends paid on common stock per share in 2006, in dollars?', 'and what was, in millions, the total of dividends paid in that year?', 'how many shares, then, in millions, were bought in 2006, considering those two values?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: page 31 of 94 other liquidity items cash payments required for long-term debt maturities , rental payments under noncancellable operating leases , purchase obligations and other commitments in effect at december 31 , 2007 , are summarized in the following table: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions )</td><td>payments due by period ( a ) total</td><td>payments due by period ( a ) less than 1 year</td><td>payments due by period ( a ) 1-3 years</td><td>payments due by period ( a ) 3-5 years</td><td>payments due by period ( a ) more than 5 years</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>long-term debt</td><td>$ 2302.6</td><td>$ 126.1</td><td>$ 547.6</td><td>$ 1174.9</td><td>$ 454.0</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>capital lease obligations</td><td>4.4</td><td>1.0</td><td>0.8</td><td>0.5</td><td>2.1</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>interest payments on long-term debt ( b )</td><td>698.6</td><td>142.9</td><td>246.3</td><td>152.5</td><td>156.9</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>operating leases</td><td>218.5</td><td>49.9</td><td>71.7</td><td>42.5</td><td>54.4</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>purchase obligations ( c )</td><td>6092.6</td><td>2397.2</td><td>3118.8</td><td>576.6</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>common stock repurchase agreements</td><td>131.0</td><td>131.0</td><td>2013</td><td>2013</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>legal settlement</td><td>70.0</td><td>70.0</td><td>2013</td><td>2013</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>total payments on contractual obligations</td><td>$ 9517.7</td><td>$ 2918.1</td><td>$ 3985.2</td><td>$ 1947.0</td><td>$ 667.4</td></tr></table> total payments on contractual obligations $ 9517.7 $ 2918.1 $ 3985.2 $ 1947.0 $ 667.4 ( a ) amounts reported in local currencies have been translated at the year-end exchange rates . ( b ) for variable rate facilities , amounts are based on interest rates in effect at year end and do not contemplate the effects of hedging instruments . ( c ) the company 2019s purchase obligations include contracted amounts for aluminum , steel , plastic resin and other direct materials . also included are commitments for purchases of natural gas and electricity , aerospace and technologies contracts and other less significant items . in cases where variable prices and/or usage are involved , management 2019s best estimates have been used . depending on the circumstances , early termination of the contracts may not result in penalties and , therefore , actual payments could vary significantly . contributions to the company 2019s defined benefit pension plans , not including the unfunded german plans , are expected to be $ 49 million in 2008 . this estimate may change based on plan asset performance . benefit payments related to these plans are expected to be $ 66 million , $ 70 million , $ 74 million , $ 77 million and $ 82 million for the years ending december 31 , 2008 through 2012 , respectively , and a total of $ 473 million for the years 2013 through 2017 . payments to participants in the unfunded german plans are expected to be approximately $ 26 million in each of the years 2008 through 2012 and a total of $ 136 million for the years 2013 through 2017 . in accordance with united kingdom pension regulations , ball has provided an a38 million guarantee to the plan for its defined benefit plan in the united kingdom . if the company 2019s credit rating falls below specified levels , ball will be required to either : ( 1 ) contribute an additional a38 million to the plan ; ( 2 ) provide a letter of credit to the plan in that amount or ( 3 ) if imposed by the appropriate regulatory agency , provide a lien on company assets in that amount for the benefit of the plan . the guarantee can be removed upon approval by both ball and the pension plan trustees . our share repurchase program in 2007 was $ 211.3 million , net of issuances , compared to $ 45.7 million net repurchases in 2006 and $ 358.1 million in 2005 . the net repurchases included the $ 51.9 million settlement on january 5 , 2007 , of a forward contract entered into in december 2006 for the repurchase of 1200000 shares . however , the 2007 net repurchases did not include a forward contract entered into in december 2007 for the repurchase of 675000 shares . the contract was settled on january 7 , 2008 , for $ 31 million in cash . on december 12 , 2007 , in a privately negotiated transaction , ball entered into an accelerated share repurchase agreement to buy $ 100 million of its common shares using cash on hand and available borrowings . the company advanced the $ 100 million on january 7 , 2008 , and received approximately 2 million shares , which represented 90 percent of the total shares as calculated using the previous day 2019s closing price . the exact number of shares to be repurchased under the agreement , which will be determined on the settlement date ( no later than june 5 , 2008 ) , is subject to an adjustment based on a weighted average price calculation for the period between the initial purchase date and the settlement date . the company has the option to settle the contract in either cash or shares . including the settlements of the forward share purchase contract and the accelerated share repurchase agreement , we expect to repurchase approximately $ 300 million of our common shares , net of issuances , in 2008 . annual cash dividends paid on common stock were 40 cents per share in 2007 , 2006 and 2005 . total dividends paid were $ 40.6 million in 2007 , $ 41 million in 2006 and $ 42.5 million in 2005. .

['0.4', '41.0', '102.5']

['as of december 31, 2004, what percentage of the total of aggregate contractual obligations was due to long-term debt?', 'and what percentage of it was due to purchase obligations?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: table of contents item 7 2013 management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations liquidity and capital resources we recorded net earnings of $ 35.4 million or $ 1.18 per share in 2004 , compared with $ 52.2 million or $ 1.76 per share recorded in 2003 and $ 51.3 million or $ 1.86 per share in 2002 . net earnings recorded in 2004 were negatively impacted by cost increases to steel and freight , as well as manufacturing inefficiencies during the first nine months of the year in our ashland city plant and higher selling , general and administrative expense ( sg&a ) . while net earnings were flat in 2003 compared with 2002 , the lower earnings per share amount in 2003 as compared with 2002 reflected the full-year impact of our stock offering in may 2002 . our individual segment performance will be discussed later in this section . our working capital , excluding short-term debt , was $ 339.8 million at december 31 , 2004 , compared with $ 305.9 million and $ 225.1 million at december 31 , 2003 , and december 31 , 2002 , respectively . the $ 33.9 million increase in 2004 reflects $ 44.9 million higher receivable balances due to longer payment terms experienced by both of our businesses as well as higher sales levels in the fourth quarter . offsetting the increase in receivable balances were $ 13.5 million lower inventory levels split about equally between water systems and electrical products and $ 14.3 million higher accounts payable balances . the $ 80.8 million increase in 2003 reflects $ 46.6 million higher inventory balances due primarily to extensive manufacturing repositioning in our electric motor business and several new product introductions and manufacturing consolidation in our water systems business . additionally , receivable balances were $ 21.2 million higher due to price increases associated with new product introductions in our water systems business and an increase in international sales , which tend to have longer payment terms . finally , a $ 13.1 million increase in accounts payable balances was largely offset by $ 9.4 million in restructuring expenses paid out in 2003 . reducing working capital is one of our major initiatives in 2005 . cash provided by operating activities during 2004 was $ 67.2 million compared with $ 29.0 million during 2003 and $ 116.0 million during 2002 . despite lower earnings in 2004 , a smaller investment in working capital explains the majority of the improvement in cash flow compared with 2003 . the higher investment in working capital in 2003 ( as discussed above ) , explains the majority of the difference between 2003 and our capital expenditures were $ 48.5 million in 2004 , essentially the same as in 2003 and approximately $ 2.2 million higher than in 2002 . the increase in 2003 was associated with new product launches in our water systems business . we are projecting 2005 capital expenditures to be approximately $ 55 million , essentially the same as our projected 2005 depreciation expense . we believe that our present facilities and planned capital expenditures are sufficient to provide adequate capacity for our operations in 2005 . in june 2004 , we completed a $ 265 million , five-year revolving credit facility with a group of eight banks . the new facility expires on june 10 , 2009 , and it replaced a $ 250 million credit facility which expired on august 2 , 2004 , and was terminated on june 10 , 2004 . the new facility backs up commercial paper and credit line borrowings . as a result of the long-term nature of this facility , the commercial paper and credit line borrowings are now classified as long-term debt . at december 31 , 2004 , we had available borrowing capacity of $ 153.9 million under this facility . we believe that the combination of available borrowing capacity and operating cash flow will provide sufficient funds to finance our existing operations for the foreseeable future . to take advantage of historically low long-term borrowing rates , we issued $ 50.0 million in senior notes with two insurance companies in june 2003 . the notes range in maturity between 2013 and 2016 and carry a weighted average interest rate of slightly less than 4.5 percent . the proceeds of the notes were used to repay commercial paper and borrowing under the credit facility . our leverage , as measured by the ratio of total debt to total capitalization , was 32 percent at the end of 2004 and the end of 2003 . aggregate contractual obligations a summary of our contractual obligations as of december 31 , 2004 , is as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in millions ) contractual obligation</td><td>( dollars in millions ) total</td><td>( dollars in millions ) less than 1 year</td><td>( dollars in millions ) 1 - 3 years</td><td>( dollars in millions ) 3 - 5 years</td><td>more than 5 years</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>long-term debt</td><td>$ 275.1</td><td>$ 8.6</td><td>$ 13.8</td><td>$ 138.2</td><td>$ 114.5</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>capital leases</td><td>6.0</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>6.0</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating leases</td><td>62.9</td><td>14.4</td><td>20.7</td><td>11.6</td><td>16.2</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>purchase obligations</td><td>177.3</td><td>176.6</td><td>0.7</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>$ 521.3</td><td>$ 199.6</td><td>$ 35.2</td><td>$ 155.8</td><td>$ 130.7</td></tr></table> .

['275.1', '0.34011']

['what was the net change in cash contributions to funded plans and benefit payments for unfunded plans from 2015 to 2016?', 'what was the value in 2015?', 'what is the change over the 2015 value?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: pension expense . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>pension expense</td><td>$ 68.1</td><td>$ 135.6</td><td>$ 135.9</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>special terminations settlements and curtailments ( included above )</td><td>7.3</td><td>35.2</td><td>5.8</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>weighted average discount rate ( a )</td><td>4.1% ( 4.1 % )</td><td>4.0% ( 4.0 % )</td><td>4.6% ( 4.6 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>weighted average expected rate of return on plan assets</td><td>7.5% ( 7.5 % )</td><td>7.4% ( 7.4 % )</td><td>7.7% ( 7.7 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>weighted average expected rate of compensation increase</td><td>3.5% ( 3.5 % )</td><td>3.5% ( 3.5 % )</td><td>3.9% ( 3.9 % )</td></tr></table> ( a ) effective in 2016 , the company began to measure the service cost and interest cost components of pension expense by applying spot rates along the yield curve to the relevant projected cash flows , as we believe this provides a better measurement of these costs . the company has accounted for this as a change in accounting estimate and , accordingly has accounted for it on a prospective basis . this change does not affect the measurement of the total benefit obligation . 2016 vs . 2015 pension expense , excluding special items , decreased from the prior year due to the adoption of the spot rate approach which reduced service cost and interest cost , the impact from expected return on assets and demographic gains , partially offset by the impact of the adoption of new mortality tables for our major plans . special items of $ 7.3 included pension settlement losses of $ 6.4 , special termination benefits of $ 2.0 , and curtailment gains of $ 1.1 . these resulted primarily from our recent business restructuring and cost reduction actions . 2015 vs . 2014 the decrease in pension expense , excluding special items , was due to the impact from expected return on assets , a 40 bp reduction in the weighted average compensation increase assumption , and lower service cost and interest cost . the decrease was partially offset by the impact of higher amortization of actuarial losses , which resulted primarily from a 60 bp decrease in weighted average discount rate . special items of $ 35.2 included pension settlement losses of $ 21.2 , special termination benefits of $ 8.7 , and curtailment losses of $ 5.3 . these resulted primarily from our recent business restructuring and cost reduction actions . 2017 outlook in 2017 , pension expense , excluding special items , is estimated to be approximately $ 70 to $ 75 , an increase of $ 10 to $ 15 from 2016 , resulting primarily from a decrease in discount rates , offset by favorable asset experience , effects of the versum spin-off and the adoption of new mortality tables . pension settlement losses of $ 10 to $ 15 are expected , dependent on the timing of retirements . in 2017 , we expect pension expense to include approximately $ 164 for amortization of actuarial losses compared to $ 121 in 2016 . net actuarial losses of $ 484 were recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income in 2016 , primarily attributable to lower discount rates and improved mortality projections . actuarial gains/losses are amortized into pension expense over prospective periods to the extent they are not offset by future gains or losses . future changes in the discount rate and actual returns on plan assets different from expected returns would impact the actuarial gains/losses and resulting amortization in years beyond 2017 . during the first quarter of 2017 , the company expects to record a curtailment loss estimated to be $ 5 to $ 10 related to employees transferring to versum . the loss will be reflected in the results from discontinued operations on the consolidated income statements . we continue to evaluate opportunities to manage the liabilities associated with our pension plans . pension funding pension funding includes both contributions to funded plans and benefit payments for unfunded plans , which are primarily non-qualified plans . with respect to funded plans , our funding policy is that contributions , combined with appreciation and earnings , will be sufficient to pay benefits without creating unnecessary surpluses . in addition , we make contributions to satisfy all legal funding requirements while managing our capacity to benefit from tax deductions attributable to plan contributions . with the assistance of third party actuaries , we analyze the liabilities and demographics of each plan , which help guide the level of contributions . during 2016 and 2015 , our cash contributions to funded plans and benefit payments for unfunded plans were $ 79.3 and $ 137.5 , respectively . for 2017 , cash contributions to defined benefit plans are estimated to be $ 65 to $ 85 . the estimate is based on expected contributions to certain international plans and anticipated benefit payments for unfunded plans , which .

['-58.2', '137.5', '-0.42327']

['what was the change in the value of the interest retained by upri from 2007 to 2008?', 'and how much does this change represent in relation to that value in 2007, in percentage?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: interest rate cash flow hedges 2013 we report changes in the fair value of cash flow hedges in accumulated other comprehensive loss until the hedged item affects earnings . at both december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , we had reductions of $ 4 million recorded as an accumulated other comprehensive loss that is being amortized on a straight-line basis through september 30 , 2014 . as of december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , we had no interest rate cash flow hedges outstanding . earnings impact 2013 our use of derivative financial instruments had the following impact on pre-tax income for the years ended december 31 : millions of dollars 2008 2007 2006 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions of dollars</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>( increase ) /decrease in interest expense from interest rate hedging</td><td>$ 1</td><td>$ -8 ( 8 )</td><td>$ -8 ( 8 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>( increase ) /decrease in fuel expense from fuel derivatives</td><td>1</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td><td>3</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>increase/ ( decrease ) in pre-tax income</td><td>$ 2</td><td>$ -9 ( 9 )</td><td>$ -5 ( 5 )</td></tr></table> fair value of debt instruments 2013 the fair value of our short- and long-term debt was estimated using quoted market prices , where available , or current borrowing rates . at december 31 , 2008 , the fair value of total debt is approximately $ 247 million less than the carrying value . at december 31 , 2007 , the fair value of total debt exceeded the carrying value by approximately $ 96 million . at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , approximately $ 320 million and $ 181 million , respectively , of fixed-rate debt securities contained call provisions that allowed us to retire the debt instruments prior to final maturity , with the payment of fixed call premiums , or in certain cases , at par . sale of receivables 2013 the railroad transfers most of its accounts receivable to union pacific receivables , inc . ( upri ) , a bankruptcy-remote subsidiary , as part of a sale of receivables facility . upri sells , without recourse on a 364-day revolving basis , an undivided interest in such accounts receivable to investors . the total capacity to sell undivided interests to investors under the facility was $ 700 million and $ 600 million at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . the value of the outstanding undivided interest held by investors under the facility was $ 584 million and $ 600 million at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . upri reduced the outstanding undivided interest held by investors due to a decrease in available receivables at december 31 , 2008 . the value of the outstanding undivided interest held by investors is not included in our consolidated financial statements . the value of the undivided interest held by investors was supported by $ 1015 million and $ 1071 million of accounts receivable held by upri at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , the value of the interest retained by upri was $ 431 million and $ 471 million , respectively . this retained interest is included in accounts receivable in our consolidated financial statements . the interest sold to investors is sold at carrying value , which approximates fair value , and there is no gain or loss recognized from the transaction . the value of the outstanding undivided interest held by investors could fluctuate based upon the availability of eligible receivables and is directly affected by changing business volumes and credit risks , including default and dilution . if default or dilution percentages were to increase one percentage point , the amount of eligible receivables would decrease by $ 6 million . should our credit rating fall below investment grade , the value of the outstanding undivided interest held by investors would be reduced , and , in certain cases , the investors would have the right to discontinue the facility . the railroad services the sold receivables ; however , the railroad does not recognize any servicing asset or liability as the servicing fees adequately compensate us for these responsibilities . the railroad collected approximately $ 17.8 billion and $ 16.1 billion during the years ended december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . upri used certain of these proceeds to purchase new receivables under the facility. .

['-40.0', '-0.08493']

['in the year of 2005, what percentage did the federal nol set to expire between 2016 to 2020 represent in relation to the total federal one?', 'and what was the total nol, considering the federal and the state one?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) at december 31 , 2005 , the company had net federal and state operating loss carryforwards available to reduce future taxable income of approximately $ 2.2 billion and $ 2.4 billion , respectively . if not utilized , the company 2019s net operating loss carryforwards expire as follows ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>years ended december 31,</td><td>federal</td><td>state</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2006 to 2010</td><td>$ 5248</td><td>$ 469747</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2011 to 2015</td><td>10012</td><td>272662</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2016 to 2020</td><td>397691</td><td>777707</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2021 to 2025</td><td>1744552</td><td>897896</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>$ 2157503</td><td>$ 2418012</td></tr></table> sfas no . 109 , 201caccounting for income taxes , 201d requires that companies record a valuation allowance when it is 201cmore likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized . 201d at december 31 , 2005 , the company has provided a valuation allowance of approximately $ 422.4 million , including approximately $ 249.5 million attributable to spectrasite , primarily related to net operating loss and capital loss carryforwards . approximately $ 237.8 million of the spectrasite valuation allowance was assumed as of the acquisition date . the balance of the valuation allowance primarily relates to net state deferred tax assets . the company has not provided a valuation allowance for the remaining deferred tax assets , primarily its federal net operating loss carryforwards , as management believes the company will have sufficient time to realize these federal net operating loss carryforwards during the twenty-year tax carryforward period . the company intends to recover a portion of its deferred tax asset through its federal income tax refund claims related to the carry back of certain federal net operating losses . in june 2003 and october 2003 , the company filed federal income tax refund claims with the irs relating to the carry back of $ 380.0 million of net operating losses generated prior to 2003 , of which the company initially anticipated receiving approximately $ 90.0 million . based on preliminary discussions with tax authorities , the company has revised its estimate of the net realizable value of the federal income tax refund claims and anticipates receiving a refund of approximately $ 65.0 million as a result of these claims by the end of 2006 . there can be no assurances , however , with respect to the specific amount and timing of any refund . the recoverability of the company 2019s remaining net deferred tax asset has been assessed utilizing stable state ( no growth ) projections based on its current operations . the projections show a significant decrease in depreciation and interest expense in the later years of the carryforward period as a result of a significant portion of its assets being fully depreciated during the first fifteen years of the carryforward period and debt repayments reducing interest expense . accordingly , the recoverability of the net deferred tax asset is not dependent on material improvements to operations , material asset sales or other non-routine transactions . based on its current outlook of future taxable income during the carryforward period , management believes that the net deferred tax asset will be realized . the realization of the company 2019s deferred tax assets as of december 31 , 2005 will be dependent upon its ability to generate approximately $ 1.3 billion in taxable income from january 1 , 2006 to december 31 , 2025 . if the company is unable to generate sufficient taxable income in the future , or carry back losses , as described above , it will be required to reduce its net deferred tax asset through a charge to income tax expense , which would result in a corresponding decrease in stockholders 2019 equity . from time to time the company is subject to examination by various tax authorities in jurisdictions in which the company has significant business operations . the company regularly assesses the likelihood of additional assessments in each of the tax jurisdictions resulting from these examinations . during the year ended .

['0.18433', '4575515.0']

['between the years of 2004 and 2005, what was the variation in the long-term debt?', 'and concerning the long-term financing, what percentage of it was classified as current by the end of the last year of that period, in 2005?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the term of the economic rights agreement is seventy years ; however , tv azteca has the right to purchase , at fair market value , the economic rights from the company at any time during the last fifty years of the agreement . should tv azteca elect to purchase the economic rights ( in whole or in part ) , it would also be obligated to repay a proportional amount of the loan discussed above at the time of such election . the company 2019s obligation to pay tv azteca $ 1.5 million annually would also be reduced proportionally . the company has accounted for the annual payment of $ 1.5 million as a capital lease ( initially recording an asset and a corresponding liability of approximately $ 18.6 million ) . the capital lease asset and the discount on the note , which aggregate approximately $ 30.2 million , represent the cost to acquire the economic rights and are being amortized over the seventy-year life of the economic rights agreement . on a quarterly basis , the company assesses the recoverability of its note receivable from tv azteca . as of december 31 , 2005 and 2004 , the company has assessed the recoverability of the note receivable from tv azteca and concluded that no adjustment to its carrying value is required . an executive officer and former director of the company served as a director of tv azteca from december 1999 to february 2006 . as of december 31 , 2005 and 2004 , the company also had other long-term notes receivable outstanding of approximately $ 11.1 million and $ 11.2 million , respectively . 7 . financing arrangements outstanding amounts under the company 2019s long-term financing arrangements consisted of the following as of december 31 , ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>american tower credit facility</td><td>$ 793000</td><td>$ 698000</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>spectrasite credit facility</td><td>700000</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>senior subordinated notes</td><td>400000</td><td>400000</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>senior subordinated discount notes net of discount and warrant valuation</td><td>160252</td><td>303755</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>senior notes net of discount and premium</td><td>726754</td><td>1001817</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>convertible notes net of discount</td><td>773058</td><td>830056</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>notes payable and capital leases</td><td>60365</td><td>59986</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>total</td><td>3613429</td><td>3293614</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>less current portion of other long-term obligations</td><td>-162153 ( 162153 )</td><td>-138386 ( 138386 )</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>long-term debt</td><td>$ 3451276</td><td>$ 3155228</td></tr></table> new credit facilities 2014in october 2005 , the company refinanced the two existing credit facilities of its principal operating subsidiaries . the company replaced the existing american tower $ 1.1 billion senior secured credit facility with a new $ 1.3 billion senior secured credit facility and replaced the existing spectrasite $ 900.0 million senior secured credit facility with a new $ 1.15 billion senior secured credit facility . as a result of the repayment of the previous credit facilities , the company recorded a net loss on retirement of long-term obligations of $ 9.8 million in the fourth quarter of 2005. .

['296048.0', '0.04488']

['what was the difference in free cash flow between 2015 and 2014 {answer0}?', 'and as a percentage change?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: to , rather than as a substitute for , cash provided by operating activities . the following table reconciles cash provided by operating activities ( gaap measure ) to free cash flow ( non-gaap measure ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 7344</td><td>$ 7385</td><td>$ 6823</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cash used in investing activities</td><td>-4476 ( 4476 )</td><td>-4249 ( 4249 )</td><td>-3405 ( 3405 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dividends paid</td><td>-2344 ( 2344 )</td><td>-1632 ( 1632 )</td><td>-1333 ( 1333 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>free cash flow</td><td>$ 524</td><td>$ 1504</td><td>$ 2085</td></tr></table> 2016 outlook f0b7 safety 2013 operating a safe railroad benefits all our constituents : our employees , customers , shareholders and the communities we serve . we will continue using a multi-faceted approach to safety , utilizing technology , risk assessment , quality control , training and employee engagement , and targeted capital investments . we will continue using and expanding the deployment of total safety culture and courage to care throughout our operations , which allows us to identify and implement best practices for employee and operational safety . we will continue our efforts to increase detection of rail defects ; improve or close crossings ; and educate the public and law enforcement agencies about crossing safety through a combination of our own programs ( including risk assessment strategies ) , industry programs and local community activities across our network . f0b7 network operations 2013 in 2016 , we will continue to align resources with customer demand , continue to improve network performance , and maintain our surge capability . f0b7 fuel prices 2013 with the dramatic drop in fuel prices during 2015 , fuel price projections continue to be uncertain in the current environment . we again could see volatile fuel prices during the year , as they are sensitive to global and u.s . domestic demand , refining capacity , geopolitical events , weather conditions and other factors . as prices fluctuate , there will be a timing impact on earnings , as our fuel surcharge programs trail fluctuations in fuel price by approximately two months . continuing lower fuel prices could have a positive impact on the economy by increasing consumer discretionary spending that potentially could increase demand for various consumer products that we transport . alternatively , lower fuel prices will likely have a negative impact on other commodities such as coal , frac sand and crude oil shipments . f0b7 capital plan 2013 in 2016 , we expect our capital plan to be approximately $ 3.75 billion , including expenditures for ptc , 230 locomotives and 450 freight cars . the capital plan may be revised if business conditions warrant or if new laws or regulations affect our ability to generate sufficient returns on these investments . ( see further discussion in this item 7 under liquidity and capital resources 2013 capital plan. ) f0b7 financial expectations 2013 economic conditions in many of our market sectors continue to drive uncertainty with respect to our volume levels . we expect volumes to be down slightly in 2016 compared to 2015 , but will depend on the overall economy and market conditions . the strong u.s . dollar and historic low commodity prices could also drive continued volatility . one of the biggest uncertainties is the outlook for energy markets , which will bring both challenges and opportunities . in the current environment , we expect continued margin improvement driven by continued pricing opportunities , ongoing productivity initiatives , and the ability to leverage our resources and strengthen our franchise . over the longer term , we expect the overall u.s . economy to continue to improve at a modest pace , with some markets outperforming others. .

['-980.0', '-0.6516']

['what is the total acquired intangible assets in thousands?', 'what is the total purchase price in thousands?', 'what portion of the total purchase price is for intangible assets?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: software and will give the company a comprehensive design-to-silicon flow that links directly into the semiconductor manufacturing process . integrating hpl 2019s yield management and test chip technologies into the company 2019s industry-leading dfm portfolio is also expected to enable customers to increase their productivity and improve profitability in the design and manufacture of advanced semiconductor devices . purchase price . the company paid $ 11.0 million in cash for all outstanding shares of hpl . in addition , the company had a prior investment in hpl of approximately $ 1.9 million . the total purchase consideration consisted of: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash paid</td><td>$ 11001</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>prior investment in hpl</td><td>1872</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>acquisition-related costs</td><td>2831</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total purchase price</td><td>$ 15704</td></tr></table> acquisition-related costs of $ 2.8 million consist primarily of legal , tax and accounting fees of $ 1.6 million , $ 0.3 million of estimated facilities closure costs and other directly related charges , and $ 0.9 million in employee termination costs . as of october 31 , 2006 , the company had paid $ 2.2 million of the acquisition related costs , of which $ 1.1 million were for professional services costs , $ 0.2 million were for facilities closure costs and $ 0.9 million were for employee termination costs . the $ 0.6 million balance remaining at october 31 , 2006 consists of professional and tax-related service fees and facilities closure costs . assets acquired . the company acquired $ 8.5 million of intangible assets consisting of $ 5.1 million in core developed technology , $ 3.2 million in customer relationships and $ 0.2 million in backlog to be amortized over two to four years . approximately $ 0.8 million of the purchase price represents the fair value of acquired in-process research and development projects that have not yet reached technological feasibility and have no alternative future use . accordingly , the amount was immediately expensed and included in the company 2019s condensed consolidated statement of operations for the first quarter of fiscal year 2006 . additionally , the company acquired tangible assets of $ 14.0 million and assumed liabilities of $ 10.9 million . goodwill , representing the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired in the merger was $ 3.4 million . goodwill resulted primarily from the company 2019s expectation of synergies from the integration of hpl 2019s technology with the company 2019s technology and operations . other . during the fiscal year 2006 , the company completed an asset acquisition for cash consideration of $ 1.5 million . this acquisition is not considered material to the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet and results of operations . fiscal 2005 acquisitions nassda corporation ( nassda ) the company acquired nassda on may 11 , 2005 . reasons for the acquisition . the company believes nassda 2019s full-chip circuit simulation and analysis software will broaden its offerings of transistor-level circuit simulation tools , particularly in the area of mixed-signal and memory design . purchase price . the company acquired all the outstanding shares of nassda for total cash consideration of $ 200.2 million , or $ 7.00 per share . in addition , as required by the merger agreement , certain nassda officers , directors and employees who were defendants in certain preexisting litigation .

['8500.0', '15704.0', '0.54126']

['what was the total of non-utility nuclear earnings by the end of 2002?', 'and what was it by the beginning of that year?', 'throughout the year, then, by how much did it increase?', 'and what was this increase as a percent of the beginning of the year total?', 'and in this same year of 2002, how much did the net mw in operation represent in relation to the generation in gwh?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: entergy corporation and subsidiaries management's financial discussion and analysis the decrease in interest income in 2002 was primarily due to : fffd interest recognized in 2001 on grand gulf 1's decommissioning trust funds resulting from the final order addressing system energy's rate proceeding ; fffd interest recognized in 2001 at entergy mississippi and entergy new orleans on the deferred system energy costs that were not being recovered through rates ; and fffd lower interest earned on declining deferred fuel balances . the decrease in interest charges in 2002 is primarily due to : fffd a decrease of $ 31.9 million in interest on long-term debt primarily due to the retirement of long-term debt in late 2001 and early 2002 ; and fffd a decrease of $ 76.0 million in other interest expense primarily due to interest recorded on system energy's reserve for rate refund in 2001 . the refund was made in december 2001 . 2001 compared to 2000 results for the year ended december 31 , 2001 for u.s . utility were also affected by an increase in interest charges of $ 61.5 million primarily due to : fffd the final ferc order addressing the 1995 system energy rate filing ; fffd debt issued at entergy arkansas in july 2001 , at entergy gulf states in june 2000 and august 2001 , at entergy mississippi in january 2001 , and at entergy new orleans in july 2000 and february 2001 ; and fffd borrowings under credit facilities during 2001 , primarily at entergy arkansas . non-utility nuclear the increase in earnings in 2002 for non-utility nuclear from $ 128 million to $ 201 million was primarily due to the operation of indian point 2 and vermont yankee , which were purchased in september 2001 and july 2002 , respectively . the increase in earnings in 2001 for non-utility nuclear from $ 49 million to $ 128 million was primarily due to the operation of fitzpatrick and indian point 3 for a full year , as each was purchased in november 2000 , and the operation of indian point 2 , which was purchased in september 2001 . following are key performance measures for non-utility nuclear: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2002</td><td>2001</td><td>2000</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net mw in operation at december 31</td><td>3955</td><td>3445</td><td>2475</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>generation in gwh for the year</td><td>29953</td><td>22614</td><td>7171</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>capacity factor for the year</td><td>93% ( 93 % )</td><td>93% ( 93 % )</td><td>94% ( 94 % )</td></tr></table> 2002 compared to 2001 the following fluctuations in the results of operations for non-utility nuclear in 2002 were primarily caused by the acquisitions of indian point 2 and vermont yankee ( except as otherwise noted ) : fffd operating revenues increased $ 411.0 million to $ 1.2 billion ; fffd other operation and maintenance expenses increased $ 201.8 million to $ 596.3 million ; fffd depreciation and amortization expenses increased $ 25.1 million to $ 42.8 million ; fffd fuel expenses increased $ 29.4 million to $ 105.2 million ; fffd nuclear refueling outage expenses increased $ 23.9 million to $ 46.8 million , which was due primarily to a .

['201.0', '128.0', '73.0', '0.57031', '0.13204']

['what was the beginning number of stores in 2012?', 'and what was the number of stores in the end of that year?', 'what was, then, the change in that number throughout the year?', 'what was the ending number of stores in 2012?', 'and how much does that change represent in relation to this number?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: the following table sets forth information concerning increases in the total number of our aap stores during the past five years: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>beginning stores</td><td>3460</td><td>3369</td><td>3264</td><td>3243</td><td>3153</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>new stores ( 1 )</td><td>116</td><td>95</td><td>110</td><td>75</td><td>109</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>stores closed</td><td>2014</td><td>-4 ( 4 )</td><td>-5 ( 5 )</td><td>-54 ( 54 )</td><td>-19 ( 19 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>ending stores</td><td>3576</td><td>3460</td><td>3369</td><td>3264</td><td>3243</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) does not include stores that opened as relocations of previously existing stores within the same general market area or substantial renovations of stores . store technology . our store-based information systems are comprised of a proprietary and integrated point of sale , electronic parts catalog , or epc , and store-level inventory management system ( collectively "store system" ) . information maintained by our store system is used to formulate pricing , marketing and merchandising strategies and to replenish inventory accurately and rapidly . our fully integrated system enables our store team members to assist our customers in their parts selection and ordering based on the year , make , model and engine type of their vehicles . our store system provides real-time inventory tracking at the store level allowing store team members to check the quantity of on-hand inventory for any sku , adjust stock levels for select items for store specific events , automatically process returns and defective merchandise , designate skus for cycle counts and track merchandise transfers . if a hard-to-find part or accessory is not available at one of our stores , the store system can determine whether the part is carried and in-stock through our hub or pdq ae networks or can be ordered directly from one of our vendors . available parts and accessories are then ordered electronically from another store , hub , pdq ae or directly from the vendor with immediate confirmation of price , availability and estimated delivery time . our centrally-based epc data management system enables us to reduce the time needed to ( i ) exchange data with our vendors and ( ii ) catalog and deliver updated , accurate parts information . we also support our store operations with additional proprietary systems and customer driven labor scheduling capabilities . all of these systems are tightly integrated and provide real-time , comprehensive information to store personnel , resulting in improved customer service levels , team member productivity and in-stock availability . we plan to start rolling out a new and enhanced epc in fiscal 2013 which is expected to simplify and improve the customer experience . among the improvements is a more efficient way to systematically identify add-on sales to ensure our customers have what they need to complete their automotive repair project . store support center merchandising . purchasing for virtually all of the merchandise for our stores is handled by our merchandise teams located in three primary locations : 2022 store support center in roanoke , virginia ; 2022 regional office in minneapolis , minnesota ; and 2022 global sourcing office in taipei , taiwan . our roanoke team is primarily responsible for the parts categories and our minnesota team is primarily responsible for accessories , oil and chemicals . our global sourcing team works closely with both teams . in fiscal 2012 , we purchased merchandise from approximately 450 vendors , with no single vendor accounting for more than 9% ( 9 % ) of purchases . our purchasing strategy involves negotiating agreements with most of our vendors to purchase merchandise over a specified period of time along with other terms , including pricing , payment terms and volume . the merchandising team has developed strong vendor relationships in the industry and , in a collaborative effort with our vendor partners , utilizes a category management process where we manage the mix of our product offerings to meet customer demand . we believe this process , which develops a customer-focused business plan for each merchandise category , and our global sourcing operation are critical to improving comparable store sales , gross margin and inventory productivity. .

['3576.0', '3460.0', '116.0', '3460.0', '0.03353']

['what was the change in the share price from lowest to highest during the quarter ended september 30 of 2010?', 'and how much does this change represent in relation to the lowest price of that quarter, in percentage?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following table presents reported quarterly high and low per share sale prices of our common stock on the new york stock exchange ( 201cnyse 201d ) for the years 2010 and 2009. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2010</td><td>high</td><td>low</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>quarter ended march 31</td><td>$ 44.61</td><td>$ 40.10</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>quarter ended june 30</td><td>45.33</td><td>38.86</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>quarter ended september 30</td><td>52.11</td><td>43.70</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>quarter ended december 31</td><td>53.14</td><td>49.61</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2009</td><td>high</td><td>low</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>quarter ended march 31</td><td>$ 32.53</td><td>$ 25.45</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>quarter ended june 30</td><td>34.52</td><td>27.93</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>quarter ended september 30</td><td>37.71</td><td>29.89</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>quarter ended december 31</td><td>43.84</td><td>35.03</td></tr></table> on february 11 , 2011 , the closing price of our common stock was $ 56.73 per share as reported on the nyse . as of february 11 , 2011 , we had 397612895 outstanding shares of common stock and 463 registered holders . dividends we have not historically paid a dividend on our common stock . payment of dividends in the future , when , as and if authorized by our board of directors , would depend upon many factors , including our earnings and financial condition , restrictions under applicable law and our current and future loan agreements , our debt service requirements , our capital expenditure requirements and other factors that our board of directors may deem relevant from time to time , including the potential determination to elect reit status . in addition , the loan agreement for our revolving credit facility and term loan contain covenants that generally restrict our ability to pay dividends unless certain financial covenants are satisfied . for more information about the restrictions under the loan agreement for the revolving credit facility and term loan , our notes indentures and the loan agreement related to our securitization , see item 7 of this annual report under the caption 201cmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2014liquidity and capital resources 2014factors affecting sources of liquidity 201d and note 6 to our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report. .

['8.41', '0.19245']

['what is the value of the investment in snap-onincorporated\tin 2008?', 'what is the net change in value?', 'what percentage change does this represent?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: five-year stock performance graph the graph below illustrates the cumulative total shareholder return on snap-on common stock since december 31 , 2007 , assuming that dividends were reinvested . the graph compares snap-on 2019s performance to that of the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index ( 201cs&p 500 201d ) and a peer group . snap-on incorporated total shareholder return ( 1 ) fiscal year ended ( 2 ) snap-on incorporated peer group ( 3 ) s&p 500 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>fiscal year ended ( 2 )</td><td>snap-onincorporated</td><td>peer group ( 3 )</td><td>s&p 500</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>december 31 2007</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 100.00</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>december 31 2008</td><td>83.66</td><td>66.15</td><td>63.00</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>december 31 2009</td><td>93.20</td><td>84.12</td><td>79.67</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>december 31 2010</td><td>128.21</td><td>112.02</td><td>91.67</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>december 31 2011</td><td>117.47</td><td>109.70</td><td>93.61</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>december 31 2012</td><td>187.26</td><td>129.00</td><td>108.59</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) assumes $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2007 , and that dividends were reinvested quarterly . ( 2 ) the company's fiscal year ends on the saturday that is on or nearest to december 31 of each year ; for ease of calculation , the fiscal year end is assumed to be december 31 . ( 3 ) the peer group consists of : stanley black & decker , inc. , danaher corporation , emerson electric co. , genuine parts company , newell rubbermaid inc. , pentair ltd. , spx corporation and w.w . grainger , inc . cooper industries plc , a former member of the peer group , was removed , as it was acquired by a larger , non-comparable company in 2012 . 2012 annual report 23 snap-on incorporated peer group s&p 500 2007 2008 201120102009 2012 .

['83.66', '-16.34', '-0.1634']

['between the years of 2016 and 2017, what was the change in the number of class a common stocks issued and outstanding?', 'and in that year of 2017, what percentage did this number represent in relation to the total amount of class a common stock authorized?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: 14 . capital stock shares outstanding . the following table presents information regarding capital stock: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>december 31 , 2017</td><td>december 31 , 2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>class a common stock authorized</td><td>1000000</td><td>1000000</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>class a common stock issued and outstanding</td><td>339235</td><td>338240</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>class b-1 common stock authorized issued and outstanding</td><td>0.6</td><td>0.6</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>class b-2 common stock authorized issued and outstanding</td><td>0.8</td><td>0.8</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>class b-3 common stock authorized issued and outstanding</td><td>1.3</td><td>1.3</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>class b-4 common stock authorized issued and outstanding</td><td>0.4</td><td>0.4</td></tr></table> cme group has no shares of preferred stock issued and outstanding . associated trading rights . members of cme , cbot , nymex and comex own or lease trading rights which entitle them to access open outcry trading , discounts on trading fees and the right to vote on certain exchange matters as provided for by the rules of the particular exchange and cme group 2019s or the subsidiaries 2019 organizational documents . each class of cme group class b common stock is associated with a membership in a specific division for trading at cme . a cme trading right is a separate asset that is not part of or evidenced by the associated share of class b common stock of cme group . the class b common stock of cme group is intended only to ensure that the class b shareholders of cme group retain rights with respect to representation on the board of directors and approval rights with respect to the core rights described below . trading rights at cbot are evidenced by class b memberships in cbot , at nymex by class a memberships in nymex and at comex by comex division memberships . members of cbot , nymex and comex do not have any rights to elect members of the board of directors and are not entitled to receive dividends or other distributions on their memberships or trading permits . core rights . holders of cme group class b common shares have the right to approve changes in specified rights relating to the trading privileges at cme associated with those shares . these core rights relate primarily to trading right protections , certain trading fee protections and certain membership benefit protections . votes on changes to these core rights are weighted by class . each class of class b common stock has the following number of votes on matters relating to core rights : class b-1 , six votes per share ; class b-2 , two votes per share ; class b-3 , one vote per share ; and class b-4 , 1/6th of one vote per share . the approval of a majority of the votes cast by the holders of shares of class b common stock is required in order to approve any changes to core rights . holders of shares of class a common stock do not have the right to vote on changes to core rights . voting rights . with the exception of the matters reserved to holders of cme group class b common stock , holders of cme group common stock vote together on all matters for which a vote of common shareholders is required . in these votes , each holder of shares of class a or class b common stock of cme group has one vote per share . transfer restrictions . each class of cme group class b common stock is subject to transfer restrictions contained in the certificate of incorporation of cme group . these transfer restrictions prohibit the sale or transfer of any shares of class b common stock separate from the sale of the associated trading rights . election of directors . the cme group board of directors is currently comprised of 20 members . holders of class b-1 , class b-2 and class b-3 common stock have the right to elect six directors , of which three are elected by class b-1 shareholders , two are elected by class b-2 shareholders and one is elected by class b-3 shareholders . the remaining directors are elected by the class a and class b shareholders voting as a single class. .

['995.0', '0.33924']

['what is the value of euro notes with march 2021 maturities?', 'what is the value with march 2026 maturities?', 'what is the sum?', 'what is the value of euro notes with may 2029 maturities?', 'what is the total sum of the 3?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: our debt issuances in 2014 were as follows : ( in millions ) type face value ( e ) interest rate issuance maturity euro notes ( a ) 20ac750 ( approximately $ 1029 ) 1.875% ( 1.875 % ) march 2014 march 2021 euro notes ( a ) 20ac1000 ( approximately $ 1372 ) 2.875% ( 2.875 % ) march 2014 march 2026 euro notes ( b ) 20ac500 ( approximately $ 697 ) 2.875% ( 2.875 % ) may 2014 may 2029 swiss franc notes ( c ) chf275 ( approximately $ 311 ) 0.750% ( 0.750 % ) may 2014 december 2019 swiss franc notes ( b ) chf250 ( approximately $ 283 ) 1.625% ( 1.625 % ) may 2014 may 2024 u.s . dollar notes ( d ) $ 500 1.250% ( 1.250 % ) november 2014 november 2017 u.s . dollar notes ( d ) $ 750 3.250% ( 3.250 % ) november 2014 november 2024 u.s . dollar notes ( d ) $ 750 4.250% ( 4.250 % ) november 2014 november 2044 ( a ) interest on these notes is payable annually in arrears beginning in march 2015 . ( b ) interest on these notes is payable annually in arrears beginning in may 2015 . ( c ) interest on these notes is payable annually in arrears beginning in december 2014 . ( d ) interest on these notes is payable semiannually in arrears beginning in may 2015 . ( e ) u.s . dollar equivalents for foreign currency notes were calculated based on exchange rates on the date of issuance . the net proceeds from the sale of the securities listed in the table above will be used for general corporate purposes . the weighted-average time to maturity of our long-term debt was 10.8 years at the end of 2013 and 2014 . 2022 off-balance sheet arrangements and aggregate contractual obligations we have no off-balance sheet arrangements , including special purpose entities , other than guarantees and contractual obligations discussed below . guarantees 2013 at december 31 , 2014 , we were contingently liable for $ 1.0 billion of guarantees of our own performance , which were primarily related to excise taxes on the shipment of our products . there is no liability in the consolidated financial statements associated with these guarantees . at december 31 , 2014 , our third-party guarantees were insignificant. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>type</td><td></td><td>face value ( e )</td><td>interest rate</td><td>issuance</td><td>maturity</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>euro notes</td><td>( a )</td><td>20ac750 ( approximately $ 1029 )</td><td>1.875% ( 1.875 % )</td><td>march 2014</td><td>march 2021</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>euro notes</td><td>( a )</td><td>20ac1000 ( approximately $ 1372 )</td><td>2.875% ( 2.875 % )</td><td>march 2014</td><td>march 2026</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>euro notes</td><td>( b )</td><td>20ac500 ( approximately $ 697 )</td><td>2.875% ( 2.875 % )</td><td>may 2014</td><td>may 2029</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>swiss franc notes</td><td>( c )</td><td>chf275 ( approximately $ 311 )</td><td>0.750% ( 0.750 % )</td><td>may 2014</td><td>december 2019</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>swiss franc notes</td><td>( b )</td><td>chf250 ( approximately $ 283 )</td><td>1.625% ( 1.625 % )</td><td>may 2014</td><td>may 2024</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>u.s . dollar notes</td><td>( d )</td><td>$ 500</td><td>1.250% ( 1.250 % )</td><td>november 2014</td><td>november 2017</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>u.s . dollar notes</td><td>( d )</td><td>$ 750</td><td>3.250% ( 3.250 % )</td><td>november 2014</td><td>november 2024</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>u.s . dollar notes</td><td>( d )</td><td>$ 750</td><td>4.250% ( 4.250 % )</td><td>november 2014</td><td>november 2044</td></tr></table> our debt issuances in 2014 were as follows : ( in millions ) type face value ( e ) interest rate issuance maturity euro notes ( a ) 20ac750 ( approximately $ 1029 ) 1.875% ( 1.875 % ) march 2014 march 2021 euro notes ( a ) 20ac1000 ( approximately $ 1372 ) 2.875% ( 2.875 % ) march 2014 march 2026 euro notes ( b ) 20ac500 ( approximately $ 697 ) 2.875% ( 2.875 % ) may 2014 may 2029 swiss franc notes ( c ) chf275 ( approximately $ 311 ) 0.750% ( 0.750 % ) may 2014 december 2019 swiss franc notes ( b ) chf250 ( approximately $ 283 ) 1.625% ( 1.625 % ) may 2014 may 2024 u.s . dollar notes ( d ) $ 500 1.250% ( 1.250 % ) november 2014 november 2017 u.s . dollar notes ( d ) $ 750 3.250% ( 3.250 % ) november 2014 november 2024 u.s . dollar notes ( d ) $ 750 4.250% ( 4.250 % ) november 2014 november 2044 ( a ) interest on these notes is payable annually in arrears beginning in march 2015 . ( b ) interest on these notes is payable annually in arrears beginning in may 2015 . ( c ) interest on these notes is payable annually in arrears beginning in december 2014 . ( d ) interest on these notes is payable semiannually in arrears beginning in may 2015 . ( e ) u.s . dollar equivalents for foreign currency notes were calculated based on exchange rates on the date of issuance . the net proceeds from the sale of the securities listed in the table above will be used for general corporate purposes . the weighted-average time to maturity of our long-term debt was 10.8 years at the end of 2013 and 2014 . 2022 off-balance sheet arrangements and aggregate contractual obligations we have no off-balance sheet arrangements , including special purpose entities , other than guarantees and contractual obligations discussed below . guarantees 2013 at december 31 , 2014 , we were contingently liable for $ 1.0 billion of guarantees of our own performance , which were primarily related to excise taxes on the shipment of our products . there is no liability in the consolidated financial statements associated with these guarantees . at december 31 , 2014 , our third-party guarantees were insignificant. .

['1029.0', '1372.0', '2401.0', '697.0', '3098.0']

['what was the total long-term debt net in 2015?', 'and what was it in 2014?', 'what was, then, the change over the year?', 'what was the total long-term debt net in 2014?', 'and how much does that change represent in relation to this 2014 long-term debt, in percentage?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: note 10 2013 debt our long-term debt consisted of the following ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>notes with rates from 1.85% ( 1.85 % ) to 3.80% ( 3.80 % ) due 2016 to 2045</td><td>$ 8150</td><td>$ 1400</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>notes with rates from 4.07% ( 4.07 % ) to 5.72% ( 5.72 % ) due 2019 to 2046</td><td>6089</td><td>3589</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>notes with rates from 6.15% ( 6.15 % ) to 9.13% ( 9.13 % ) due 2016 to 2036</td><td>1941</td><td>1941</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other debt</td><td>116</td><td>111</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total long-term debt</td><td>16296</td><td>7041</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>less : unamortized discounts and deferred financing costs</td><td>-1035 ( 1035 )</td><td>-899 ( 899 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total long-term debt net</td><td>$ 15261</td><td>$ 6142</td></tr></table> revolving credit facilities on october 9 , 2015 , we entered into a new $ 2.5 billion revolving credit facility ( the 5-year facility ) with various banks and concurrently terminated our existing $ 1.5 billion revolving credit facility , which was scheduled to expire in august 2019 . the 5-year facility , which expires on october 9 , 2020 , is available for general corporate purposes . the undrawn portion of the 5-year facility is also available to serve as a backup facility for the issuance of commercial paper . we may request and the banks may grant , at their discretion , an increase in the borrowing capacity under the 5-year facility of up to an additional $ 500 million . there were no borrowings outstanding under the 5-year facility as of and during the year ended december 31 , in contemplation of our acquisition of sikorsky , on october 9 , 2015 , we also entered into a 364-day revolving credit facility ( the 364-day facility , and together with the 5-year facility , the facilities ) with various banks that provided $ 7.0 billion of funding for general corporate purposes , including the acquisition of sikorsky . concurrent with the consummation of the sikorsky acquisition , we borrowed $ 6.0 billion under the 364-day facility . on november 23 , 2015 , we repaid all outstanding borrowings under the 364-day facility with proceeds received from an issuance of new debt ( see below ) and terminated any remaining commitments of the lenders under the 364-day facility . borrowings under the facilities bear interest at rates based , at our option , on a eurodollar rate or a base rate , as defined in the facilities 2019 agreements . each bank 2019s obligation to make loans under the 5-year facility is subject to , among other things , our compliance with various representations , warranties , and covenants , including covenants limiting our ability and certain of our subsidiaries 2019 ability to encumber assets and a covenant not to exceed a maximum leverage ratio , as defined in the five-year facility agreement . as of december 31 , 2015 , we were in compliance with all covenants contained in the 5-year facility agreement , as well as in our debt agreements . long-term debt on november 23 , 2015 , we issued $ 7.0 billion of notes ( the november 2015 notes ) in a registered public offering . we received net proceeds of $ 6.9 billion from the offering , after deducting discounts and debt issuance costs , which are being amortized as interest expense over the life of the debt . the november 2015 notes consist of : 2022 $ 750 million maturing in 2018 with a fixed interest rate of 1.85% ( 1.85 % ) ( the 2018 notes ) ; 2022 $ 1.25 billion maturing in 2020 with a fixed interest rate of 2.50% ( 2.50 % ) ( the 2020 notes ) ; 2022 $ 500 million maturing in 2023 with a fixed interest rate of 3.10% ( 3.10 % ) the 2023 notes ) ; 2022 $ 2.0 billion maturing in 2026 with a fixed interest rate of 3.55% ( 3.55 % ) ( the 2026 notes ) ; 2022 $ 500 million maturing in 2036 with a fixed interest rate of 4.50% ( 4.50 % ) ( the 2036 notes ) ; and 2022 $ 2.0 billion maturing in 2046 with a fixed interest rate of 4.70% ( 4.70 % ) ( the 2046 notes ) . we may , at our option , redeem some or all of the november 2015 notes and unpaid interest at any time by paying the principal amount of notes being redeemed plus any make-whole premium and accrued and unpaid interest to the date of redemption . interest is payable on the 2018 notes and the 2020 notes on may 23 and november 23 of each year , beginning on may 23 , 2016 ; on the 2023 notes and the 2026 notes on january 15 and july 15 of each year , beginning on july 15 , 2016 ; and on the 2036 notes and the 2046 notes on may 15 and november 15 of each year , beginning on may 15 , 2016 . the november 2015 notes rank equally in right of payment with all of our existing unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness . the proceeds of the november 2015 notes were used to repay $ 6.0 billion of borrowings under our 364-day facility and for general corporate purposes. .

['15261.0', '6142.0', '9119.0', '6142.0', '1.4847']

['what was the amount of the afs investment securities in 2018?', 'and what was it in 2017?', 'what was, then, the combined total for the two years?', 'including 2016, what then becomes this total?', 'and what was the average between the three years?', 'and between the last two years of that period, from 2017 to 2018, what was the change in the ending available for sale investment securities?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: management 2019s discussion and analysis 78 jpmorgan chase & co./2018 form 10-k treasury and cio overview treasury and cio is predominantly responsible for measuring , monitoring , reporting and managing the firm 2019s liquidity , funding , capital , structural interest rate and foreign exchange risks . the risks managed by treasury and cio arise from the activities undertaken by the firm 2019s four major reportable business segments to serve their respective client bases , which generate both on- and off- balance sheet assets and liabilities . treasury and cio seek to achieve the firm 2019s asset-liability management objectives generally by investing in high- quality securities that are managed for the longer-term as part of the firm 2019s investment securities portfolio . treasury and cio also use derivatives to meet the firm 2019s asset- liability management objectives . for further information on derivatives , refer to note 5 . in addition , treasury and cio manage the firm 2019s cash position primarily through depositing at central banks and investing in short-term instruments . for further information on liquidity and funding risk , refer to liquidity risk management on pages 95 2013100 . for information on interest rate , foreign exchange and other risks , refer to market risk management on pages 124 2013131 . the investment securities portfolio primarily consists of agency and nonagency mortgage-backed securities , u.s . and non-u.s . government securities , obligations of u.s . states and municipalities , other abs and corporate debt securities . at december 31 , 2018 , the investment securities portfolio was $ 260.1 billion , and the average credit rating of the securities comprising the portfolio was aa+ ( based upon external ratings where available and , where not available , based primarily upon internal ratings that correspond to ratings as defined by s&p and moody 2019s ) . refer to note 10 for further information on the firm 2019s investment securities portfolio . selected income statement and balance sheet data as of or for the year ended december 31 , ( in millions ) 2018 2017 2016 investment securities gains/ ( losses ) $ ( 395 ) $ ( 78 ) $ 132 available-for-sale ( 201cafs 201d ) investment securities ( average ) 203449 219345 226892 held-to-maturity ( 201chtm 201d ) investment securities ( average ) 31747 47927 51358 investment securities portfolio ( average ) 235197 267272 278250 afs investment securities ( period-end ) 228681 200247 236670 htm investment securities ( period-end ) 31434 47733 50168 investment securities portfolio ( period 2013end ) 260115 247980 286838 as permitted by the new hedge accounting guidance , the firm elected to transfer certain investment securities from htm to afs in the first quarter of 2018 . for additional information , refer to notes 1 and 10. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>as of or for the year ended december 31 ( in millions )</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>investment securities gains/ ( losses )</td><td>$ -395 ( 395 )</td><td>$ -78 ( 78 )</td><td>$ 132</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>available-for-sale ( 201cafs 201d ) investment securities ( average )</td><td>203449</td><td>219345</td><td>226892</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>held-to-maturity ( 201chtm 201d ) investment securities ( average )</td><td>31747</td><td>47927</td><td>51358</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>investment securities portfolio ( average )</td><td>235197</td><td>267272</td><td>278250</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>afs investment securities ( period-end )</td><td>228681</td><td>200247</td><td>236670</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>htm investment securities ( period-end )</td><td>31434</td><td>47733</td><td>50168</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>investment securities portfolio ( period 2013end )</td><td>260115</td><td>247980</td><td>286838</td></tr></table> management 2019s discussion and analysis 78 jpmorgan chase & co./2018 form 10-k treasury and cio overview treasury and cio is predominantly responsible for measuring , monitoring , reporting and managing the firm 2019s liquidity , funding , capital , structural interest rate and foreign exchange risks . the risks managed by treasury and cio arise from the activities undertaken by the firm 2019s four major reportable business segments to serve their respective client bases , which generate both on- and off- balance sheet assets and liabilities . treasury and cio seek to achieve the firm 2019s asset-liability management objectives generally by investing in high- quality securities that are managed for the longer-term as part of the firm 2019s investment securities portfolio . treasury and cio also use derivatives to meet the firm 2019s asset- liability management objectives . for further information on derivatives , refer to note 5 . in addition , treasury and cio manage the firm 2019s cash position primarily through depositing at central banks and investing in short-term instruments . for further information on liquidity and funding risk , refer to liquidity risk management on pages 95 2013100 . for information on interest rate , foreign exchange and other risks , refer to market risk management on pages 124 2013131 . the investment securities portfolio primarily consists of agency and nonagency mortgage-backed securities , u.s . and non-u.s . government securities , obligations of u.s . states and municipalities , other abs and corporate debt securities . at december 31 , 2018 , the investment securities portfolio was $ 260.1 billion , and the average credit rating of the securities comprising the portfolio was aa+ ( based upon external ratings where available and , where not available , based primarily upon internal ratings that correspond to ratings as defined by s&p and moody 2019s ) . refer to note 10 for further information on the firm 2019s investment securities portfolio . selected income statement and balance sheet data as of or for the year ended december 31 , ( in millions ) 2018 2017 2016 investment securities gains/ ( losses ) $ ( 395 ) $ ( 78 ) $ 132 available-for-sale ( 201cafs 201d ) investment securities ( average ) 203449 219345 226892 held-to-maturity ( 201chtm 201d ) investment securities ( average ) 31747 47927 51358 investment securities portfolio ( average ) 235197 267272 278250 afs investment securities ( period-end ) 228681 200247 236670 htm investment securities ( period-end ) 31434 47733 50168 investment securities portfolio ( period 2013end ) 260115 247980 286838 as permitted by the new hedge accounting guidance , the firm elected to transfer certain investment securities from htm to afs in the first quarter of 2018 . for additional information , refer to notes 1 and 10. .

['228681.0', '200247.0', '428928.0', '665598.0', '221866.0', '28434.0']

['what is the net change in value of delphi automotive plc from 2011 to 2014?', 'what is that divided by 100?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: stock performance graph * $ 100 invested on 11/17/11 in our stock or 10/31/11 in the relevant index , including reinvestment of dividends . fiscal year ending december 31 , 2014 . ( 1 ) delphi automotive plc ( 2 ) s&p 500 2013 standard & poor 2019s 500 total return index ( 3 ) automotive supplier peer group 2013 russell 3000 auto parts index , including american axle & manufacturing , borgwarner inc. , cooper tire & rubber company , dana holding corp. , delphi automotive plc , dorman products inc. , federal-mogul corp. , ford motor co. , fuel systems solutions inc. , general motors co. , gentex corp. , gentherm inc. , genuine parts co. , johnson controls inc. , lkq corp. , lear corp. , meritor inc. , remy international inc. , standard motor products inc. , stoneridge inc. , superior industries international , trw automotive holdings corp. , tenneco inc. , tesla motors inc. , the goodyear tire & rubber co. , tower international inc. , visteon corp. , and wabco holdings inc . company index november 17 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>company index</td><td>november 17 2011</td><td>december 31 2011</td><td>december 31 2012</td><td>december 31 2013</td><td>december 31 2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>delphi automotive plc ( 1 )</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 100.98</td><td>$ 179.33</td><td>$ 285.81</td><td>$ 350.82</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 ( 2 )</td><td>100.00</td><td>100.80</td><td>116.93</td><td>154.80</td><td>175.99</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>automotive supplier peer group ( 3 )</td><td>100.00</td><td>89.27</td><td>110.41</td><td>166.46</td><td>178.05</td></tr></table> dividends on february 26 , 2013 , the board of directors approved the initiation of dividend payments on the company's ordinary shares . the board of directors declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.17 per ordinary share that was paid in each quarter of 2013 . in january 2014 , the board of directors increased the quarterly dividend rate to $ 0.25 per ordinary share , which was paid in each quarter of 2014 . in addition , in january 2015 , the board of directors declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.25 per ordinary share , payable on february 27 , 2015 to shareholders of record at the close of business on february 18 , 2015. .

['250.82', '2.5082']

['what was the change in rd&e spendings from 2013 to 2014?', 'and how much does this change represent in relation to those spendings in 2013, in percentage?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: backlog applied manufactures systems to meet demand represented by order backlog and customer commitments . backlog consists of : ( 1 ) orders for which written authorizations have been accepted and assigned shipment dates are within the next 12 months , or shipment has occurred but revenue has not been recognized ; and ( 2 ) contractual service revenue and maintenance fees to be earned within the next 12 months . backlog by reportable segment as of october 27 , 2013 and october 28 , 2012 was as follows : 2013 2012 ( in millions , except percentages ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td></td><td>( in millions except percentages )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>silicon systems group</td><td>$ 1295</td><td>55% ( 55 % )</td><td>$ 705</td><td>44% ( 44 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>applied global services</td><td>591</td><td>25% ( 25 % )</td><td>580</td><td>36% ( 36 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>display</td><td>361</td><td>15% ( 15 % )</td><td>206</td><td>13% ( 13 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>energy and environmental solutions</td><td>125</td><td>5% ( 5 % )</td><td>115</td><td>7% ( 7 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>$ 2372</td><td>100% ( 100 % )</td><td>$ 1606</td><td>100% ( 100 % )</td></tr></table> applied 2019s backlog on any particular date is not necessarily indicative of actual sales for any future periods , due to the potential for customer changes in delivery schedules or cancellation of orders . customers may delay delivery of products or cancel orders prior to shipment , subject to possible cancellation penalties . delays in delivery schedules and/or a reduction of backlog during any particular period could have a material adverse effect on applied 2019s business and results of operations . manufacturing , raw materials and supplies applied 2019s manufacturing activities consist primarily of assembly , test and integration of various proprietary and commercial parts , components and subassemblies ( collectively , parts ) that are used to manufacture systems . applied has implemented a distributed manufacturing model under which manufacturing and supply chain activities are conducted in various countries , including the united states , europe , israel , singapore , taiwan , and other countries in asia , and assembly of some systems is completed at customer sites . applied uses numerous vendors , including contract manufacturers , to supply parts and assembly services for the manufacture and support of its products . although applied makes reasonable efforts to assure that parts are available from multiple qualified suppliers , this is not always possible . accordingly , some key parts may be obtained from only a single supplier or a limited group of suppliers . applied seeks to reduce costs and to lower the risks of manufacturing and service interruptions by : ( 1 ) selecting and qualifying alternate suppliers for key parts ; ( 2 ) monitoring the financial condition of key suppliers ; ( 3 ) maintaining appropriate inventories of key parts ; ( 4 ) qualifying new parts on a timely basis ; and ( 5 ) locating certain manufacturing operations in close proximity to suppliers and customers . research , development and engineering applied 2019s long-term growth strategy requires continued development of new products . the company 2019s significant investment in research , development and engineering ( rd&e ) has generally enabled it to deliver new products and technologies before the emergence of strong demand , thus allowing customers to incorporate these products into their manufacturing plans at an early stage in the technology selection cycle . applied works closely with its global customers to design systems and processes that meet their planned technical and production requirements . product development and engineering organizations are located primarily in the united states , as well as in europe , israel , taiwan , and china . in addition , applied outsources certain rd&e activities , some of which are performed outside the united states , primarily in india . process support and customer demonstration laboratories are located in the united states , china , taiwan , europe , and israel . applied 2019s investments in rd&e for product development and engineering programs to create or improve products and technologies over the last three years were as follows : $ 1.3 billion ( 18 percent of net sales ) in fiscal 2013 , $ 1.2 billion ( 14 percent of net sales ) in fiscal 2012 , and $ 1.1 billion ( 11 percent of net sales ) in fiscal 2011 . applied has spent an average of 14 percent of net sales in rd&e over the last five years . in addition to rd&e for specific product technologies , applied maintains ongoing programs for automation control systems , materials research , and environmental control that are applicable to its products. .

['0.1', '0.08333']

['what was the difference in accrued wages and vacation between 2007 and 2008?', 'so what was the percentage change over this time?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: when we purchase an asset , we capitalize all costs necessary to make the asset ready for its intended use . however , many of our assets are self-constructed . a large portion of our capital expenditures is for track structure expansion ( capacity projects ) and replacement ( program projects ) , which is typically performed by our employees . approximately 13% ( 13 % ) of our full-time equivalent employees are dedicated to the construction of capital assets . costs that are directly attributable or overhead costs that relate directly to capital projects are capitalized . direct costs that are capitalized as part of self-constructed assets include material , labor , and work equipment . indirect costs are capitalized if they clearly relate to the construction of the asset . these costs are allocated using appropriate statistical bases . the capitalization of indirect costs is consistent with fasb statement no . 67 , accounting for costs and initial rental operations of real estate projects . general and administrative expenditures are expensed as incurred . normal repairs and maintenance are also expensed as incurred , while costs incurred that extend the useful life of an asset , improve the safety of our operations or improve operating efficiency are capitalized . assets held under capital leases are recorded at the lower of the net present value of the minimum lease payments or the fair value of the leased asset at the inception of the lease . amortization expense is computed using the straight-line method over the shorter of the estimated useful lives of the assets or the period of the related lease . 10 . accounts payable and other current liabilities dec . 31 , dec . 31 , millions of dollars 2008 2007 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions of dollars</td><td>dec . 31 2008</td><td>dec . 31 2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>accounts payable</td><td>$ 629</td><td>$ 732</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>accrued wages and vacation</td><td>367</td><td>394</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>accrued casualty costs</td><td>390</td><td>371</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>income and other taxes</td><td>207</td><td>343</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>dividends and interest</td><td>328</td><td>284</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>equipment rents payable</td><td>93</td><td>103</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>other</td><td>546</td><td>675</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>total accounts payable and other current liabilities</td><td>$ 2560</td><td>$ 2902</td></tr></table> 11 . fair value measurements during the first quarter of 2008 , we fully adopted fasb statement no . 157 , fair value measurements ( fas 157 ) . fas 157 established a framework for measuring fair value and expanded disclosures about fair value measurements . the adoption of fas 157 had no impact on our financial position or results of operations . fas 157 applies to all assets and liabilities that are measured and reported on a fair value basis . this enables the reader of the financial statements to assess the inputs used to develop those measurements by establishing a hierarchy for ranking the quality and reliability of the information used to determine fair values . the statement requires that each asset and liability carried at fair value be classified into one of the following categories : level 1 : quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities . level 2 : observable market based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data . level 3 : unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data. .

['-27.0', '-0.06853']

['what was the percentage of total commitments that expire in less than a year?', 'what percentage of total commitments expire in 1-3 years?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: page 38 five years . the amounts ultimately applied against our offset agreements are based on negotiations with the customer and generally require cash outlays that represent only a fraction of the original amount in the offset agreement . at december 31 , 2005 , we had outstanding offset agreements totaling $ 8.4 bil- lion , primarily related to our aeronautics segment , that extend through 2015 . to the extent we have entered into purchase obligations at december 31 , 2005 that also satisfy offset agree- ments , those amounts are included in the preceding table . we have entered into standby letter of credit agreements and other arrangements with financial institutions and custom- ers mainly relating to advances received from customers and/or the guarantee of future performance on some of our contracts . at december 31 , 2005 , we had outstanding letters of credit , surety bonds and guarantees , as follows : commitment expiration by period ( in millions ) commitment 1 year ( a ) years ( a ) standby letters of credit $ 2630 $ 2425 $ 171 $ 18 $ 16 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>commitment expiration by period total commitment</td><td>commitment expiration by period less than 1 year ( a )</td><td>commitment expiration by period 1-3 years ( a )</td><td>commitment expiration by period 3-5 years</td><td>commitment expiration by period after 5 years</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>standby letters of credit</td><td>$ 2630</td><td>$ 2425</td><td>$ 171</td><td>$ 18</td><td>$ 16</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>surety bonds</td><td>434</td><td>79</td><td>352</td><td>3</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>guarantees</td><td>2</td><td>1</td><td>1</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total commitments</td><td>$ 3066</td><td>$ 2505</td><td>$ 524</td><td>$ 21</td><td>$ 16</td></tr></table> ( a ) approximately $ 2262 million and $ 49 million of standby letters of credit in the 201cless than 1 year 201d and 201c1-3 year 201d periods , respectively , and approximately $ 38 million of surety bonds in the 201cless than 1 year 201d period are expected to renew for additional periods until completion of the contractual obligation . included in the table above is approximately $ 200 million representing letter of credit and surety bond amounts for which related obligations or liabilities are also recorded in the bal- ance sheet , either as reductions of inventories , as customer advances and amounts in excess of costs incurred , or as other liabilities . approximately $ 2 billion of the standby letters of credit in the table above were to secure advance payments received under an f-16 contract from an international cus- tomer . these letters of credit are available for draw down in the event of our nonperformance , and the amount available will be reduced as certain events occur throughout the period of performance in accordance with the contract terms . similar to the letters of credit for the f-16 contract , other letters of credit and surety bonds are available for draw down in the event of our nonperformance . at december 31 , 2005 , we had no material off-balance sheet arrangements as those arrangements are defined by the securities and exchange commission ( sec ) . quantitative and qualitative disclosure of market risk our main exposure to market risk relates to interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates . our financial instruments that are subject to interest rate risk principally include fixed- rate and floating rate long-term debt . if interest rates were to change by plus or minus 1% ( 1 % ) , interest expense would increase or decrease by approximately $ 10 million related to our float- ing rate debt . the estimated fair values of the corporation 2019s long-term debt instruments at december 31 , 2005 aggregated approximately $ 6.2 billion , compared with a carrying amount of approximately $ 5.0 billion . the majority of our long-term debt obligations are not callable until maturity . we have used interest rate swaps in the past to manage our exposure to fixed and variable interest rates ; however , at year-end 2005 , we had no such agreements in place . we use forward foreign exchange contracts to manage our exposure to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates , and do so in ways that qualify for hedge accounting treatment . these exchange contracts hedge the fluctuations in cash flows associated with firm commitments or specific anticipated transactions contracted in foreign currencies , or hedge the exposure to rate changes affecting foreign currency denomi- nated assets or liabilities . related gains and losses on these contracts , to the extent they are effective hedges , are recog- nized in income at the same time the hedged transaction is recognized or when the hedged asset or liability is adjusted . to the extent the hedges are ineffective , gains and losses on the contracts are recognized in the current period . at december 31 , 2005 , the fair value of forward exchange con- tracts outstanding , as well as the amounts of gains and losses recorded during the year then ended , were not material . we do not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for trad- ing or speculative purposes . recent accounting pronouncements in december 2004 , the fasb issued fas 123 ( r ) , share- based payments , which will impact our net earnings and earn- ings per share and change the classification of certain elements of the statement of cash flows . fas 123 ( r ) requires stock options and other share-based payments made to employees to be accounted for as compensation expense and recorded at fair lockheed martin corporation management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations december 31 , 2005 .

['0.81703', '0.17091']

['what was the change in the net revenue from 2012 to 2013?', 'and what was that net revenue in 2012?', 'how much, then, does that change represent in relation to this 2012 net revenue, in percentage?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: item 7 . management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations our management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations ( md&a ) is provided in addition to the accompanying consolidated financial statements and notes to assist readers in understanding our results of operations , financial condition , and cash flows . md&a is organized as follows : 2022 overview . discussion of our business and overall analysis of financial and other highlights affecting the company in order to provide context for the remainder of md&a . 2022 critical accounting estimates . accounting estimates that we believe are most important to understanding the assumptions and judgments incorporated in our reported financial results and forecasts . 2022 results of operations . an analysis of our financial results comparing 2013 to 2012 and comparing 2012 to 2022 liquidity and capital resources . an analysis of changes in our balance sheets and cash flows , and discussion of our financial condition and potential sources of liquidity . 2022 fair value of financial instruments . discussion of the methodologies used in the valuation of our financial instruments . 2022 contractual obligations and off-balance-sheet arrangements . overview of contractual obligations , contingent liabilities , commitments , and off-balance-sheet arrangements outstanding as of december 28 , 2013 , including expected payment schedule . the various sections of this md&a contain a number of forward-looking statements that involve a number of risks and uncertainties . words such as 201canticipates , 201d 201cexpects , 201d 201cintends , 201d 201cplans , 201d 201cbelieves , 201d 201cseeks , 201d 201cestimates , 201d 201ccontinues , 201d 201cmay , 201d 201cwill , 201d 201cshould , 201d and variations of such words and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements . in addition , any statements that refer to projections of our future financial performance , our anticipated growth and trends in our businesses , uncertain events or assumptions , and other characterizations of future events or circumstances are forward-looking statements . such statements are based on our current expectations and could be affected by the uncertainties and risk factors described throughout this filing and particularly in 201crisk factors 201d in part i , item 1a of this form 10-k . our actual results may differ materially , and these forward-looking statements do not reflect the potential impact of any divestitures , mergers , acquisitions , or other business combinations that had not been completed as of february 14 , 2014 . overview our results of operations for each period were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in millions except per share amounts )</td><td>three months ended dec . 282013</td><td>three months ended sept . 282013</td><td>three months ended change</td><td>three months ended dec . 282013</td><td>three months ended dec . 292012</td><td>change</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net revenue</td><td>$ 13834</td><td>$ 13483</td><td>$ 351</td><td>$ 52708</td><td>$ 53341</td><td>$ -633 ( 633 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>gross margin</td><td>$ 8571</td><td>$ 8414</td><td>$ 157</td><td>$ 31521</td><td>$ 33151</td><td>$ -1630 ( 1630 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>gross margin percentage</td><td>62.0% ( 62.0 % )</td><td>62.4% ( 62.4 % )</td><td>( 0.4 ) % ( % )</td><td>59.8% ( 59.8 % )</td><td>62.1% ( 62.1 % )</td><td>( 2.3 ) % ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>operating income</td><td>$ 3549</td><td>$ 3504</td><td>$ 45</td><td>$ 12291</td><td>$ 14638</td><td>$ -2347 ( 2347 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net income</td><td>$ 2625</td><td>$ 2950</td><td>$ -325 ( 325 )</td><td>$ 9620</td><td>$ 11005</td><td>$ -1385 ( 1385 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>diluted earnings per common share</td><td>$ 0.51</td><td>$ 0.58</td><td>$ -0.07 ( 0.07 )</td><td>$ 1.89</td><td>$ 2.13</td><td>$ -0.24 ( 0.24 )</td></tr></table> revenue for 2013 was down 1% ( 1 % ) from 2012 . pccg experienced lower platform unit sales in the first half of the year , but saw offsetting growth in the back half as the pc market began to show signs of stabilization . dcg continued to benefit from the build out of internet cloud computing and the strength of our product portfolio resulting in increased platform volumes for dcg for the year . higher factory start-up costs for our next-generation 14nm process technology led to a decrease in gross margin compared to 2012 . in response to the current business environment and to better align resources , management approved several restructuring actions including targeted workforce reductions as well as the exit of certain businesses and facilities . these actions resulted in restructuring and asset impairment charges of $ 240 million for 2013 . table of contents .

['-633.0', '53341.0', '-0.01187']

['between the years of 2008 and 2009, what was the variation in the capital gain distributions?', 'and what is this variation as a percent of those distributions in 2008?', 'and in the subsequent year of this period, in 2010, what was the average price for which the shares were repurchased?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: investment advisory revenues earned on the other investment portfolios that we manage decreased $ 44 million , or 8.5% ( 8.5 % ) , to $ 477.8 million in 2009 . average assets in these portfolios were $ 129.5 billion during 2009 , down $ 12.6 billion or 9% ( 9 % ) from 2008 . other investment portfolio assets under management increased $ 46.7 billion during 2009 , including $ 36.5 billion in market gains and income and $ 10.2 billion of net inflows , primarily from institutional investors . net inflows include $ 1.3 billion transferred from the stock and blended asset mutual funds during 2009 . administrative fees decreased $ 35 million , or 10% ( 10 % ) , to $ 319 million in 2009 . this change includes a $ 4 million decrease in 12b-1 distribution and service fees recognized on lower average assets under management in the advisor and r classes of our sponsored mutual funds and a $ 31 million reduction in our mutual fund servicing revenue , which is primarily attributable to our cost reduction efforts in the mutual fund and retirement plan servicing functions . changes in administrative fees are generally offset by similar changes in related operating expenses that are incurred to provide services to the funds and their investors . our largest expense , compensation and related costs , decreased $ 42 million , or 5% ( 5 % ) , from 2008 to $ 773 million in 2009 . the largest part of this decrease is attributable to a $ 19 million reduction in our annual bonus program . reductions in the use of outside contractors lowered 2009 costs $ 14 million with the remainder of the cost savings primarily attributable to the workforce reduction and lower employee benefits and other employment expenses . average headcount in 2009 was down 5.4% ( 5.4 % ) from 2008 due to attrition , retirements and our workforce reduction in april 2009 . advertising and promotion expenditures were down $ 31 million , or 30% ( 30 % ) , versus 2008 due to our decision to reduce spending in response to lower investor activity in the 2009 market environment . depreciation expense and other occupancy and facility costs together increased $ 4 million , or 2.5% ( 2.5 % ) compared to 2008 , as we moderated or delayed our capital spending and facility growth plans . other operating expenses decreased $ 33 million , or 18% ( 18 % ) from 2008 , including a decline of $ 4 million in distribution and service expenses recognized on lower average assets under management in our advisor and r classes of mutual fund shares that are sourced from financial intermediaries . our cost control efforts resulted in the remaining expense reductions , including lower professional fees and travel and related costs . our non-operating investment activity resulted in net losses of $ 12.7 million in 2009 and $ 52.3 million in 2008 . the improvement of nearly $ 40 million is primarily attributable to a reduction in the other than temporary impairments recognized on our investments in sponsored mutual funds in 2009 versus 2008 . the following table details our related mutual fund investment gains and losses ( in millions ) during the two years ended december 31 , 2009. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2008</td><td>2009</td><td>change</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>other than temporary impairments recognized</td><td>$ -91.3 ( 91.3 )</td><td>$ -36.1 ( 36.1 )</td><td>$ 55.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>capital gain distributions received</td><td>5.6</td><td>2.0</td><td>-3.6 ( 3.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net gain ( loss ) realized on fund dispositions</td><td>-4.5 ( 4.5 )</td><td>7.4</td><td>11.9</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net loss recognized on fund holdings</td><td>$ -90.2 ( 90.2 )</td><td>$ -26.7 ( 26.7 )</td><td>$ 63.5</td></tr></table> lower income of $ 16 million from our money market holdings due to the significantly lower interest rate environment offset the improvement experienced with our fund investments . the 2009 provision for income taxes as a percentage of pretax income is 37.1% ( 37.1 % ) , down from 38.4% ( 38.4 % ) in 2008 . our 2009 provision includes reductions of prior years 2019 tax provisions and discrete nonrecurring benefits that lowered our 2009 effective tax rate by 1.0% ( 1.0 % ) . c a p i t a l r e s o u r c e s a n d l i q u i d i t y . during 2010 , stockholders 2019 equity increased from $ 2.9 billion to $ 3.3 billion . we repurchased nearly 5.0 million common shares for $ 240.0 million in 2010 . tangible book value is $ 2.6 billion at december 31 , 2010 , and our cash and cash equivalents and our mutual fund investment holdings total more than $ 1.5 billion . given the availability of these financial resources , we do not maintain an available external source of liquidity . t . rowe price group annual report 2010 .

['-2.7', '-0.48214', '48.0']

['what is the maximum potential change that can be made by cme on their current line of credit?', 'and how much, in percentage, does this maximum potential change represent in relation to that current line of credit as it is now?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: 2022 a financial safeguard package for cleared over-the-counter credit default swap contracts , and 2022 a financial safeguard package for cleared over-the-counter interest rate swap contracts . in the unlikely event of a payment default by a clearing firm , we would first apply assets of the defaulting clearing firm to satisfy its payment obligation . these assets include the defaulting firm 2019s guaranty fund contributions , performance bonds and any other available assets , such as assets required for membership and any associated trading rights . in addition , we would make a demand for payment pursuant to any applicable guarantee provided to us by the parent company of the clearing firm . thereafter , if the payment default remains unsatisfied , we would use the corporate contributions designated for the respective financial safeguard package . we would then use guaranty fund contributions of other clearing firms within the respective financial safeguard package and funds collected through an assessment against solvent clearing firms within the respective financial safeguard package to satisfy the deficit . we maintain a $ 5.0 billion 364-day multi-currency line of credit with a consortium of domestic and international banks to be used in certain situations by cme clearing . we have the option to request an increase in the line from $ 5.0 billion to $ 7.0 billion . we may use the proceeds to provide temporary liquidity in the unlikely event of a clearing firm default , in the event of a liquidity constraint or default by a depositary ( custodian of the collateral ) , or in the event of a temporary disruption with the payments systems that would delay payment of settlement variation between us and our clearing firms . the credit agreement requires us to pledge certain assets to the line of credit custodian prior to drawing on the line of credit . pledged assets may include clearing firm guaranty fund deposits held by us in the form of u.s . treasury or agency securities , as well as select money market mutual funds approved for our select interest earning facility ( ief ) programs . performance bond collateral of a defaulting clearing firm may also be used to secure a draw on the line . in addition to the 364-day multi- currency line of credit , we also have the option to use our $ 1.8 billion multi-currency revolving senior credit facility to provide liquidity for our clearing house in the unlikely event of default . aggregate performance bond deposits for clearing firms for all three cme financial safeguard packages was $ 86.8 billion , including $ 5.6 billion of cash performance bond deposits and $ 4.2 billion of letters of credit . a defaulting firm 2019s performance bond deposits can be used in the event of default of that clearing firm . the following shows the available assets at december 31 , 2012 in the event of a payment default by a clearing firm for the base financial safeguard package after first utilizing the defaulting firm 2019s available assets : ( in millions ) cme clearing available assets designated corporate contributions for futures and options ( 1 ) . . . . . . . . $ 100.0 guaranty fund contributions ( 2 ) . . . . . 2899.5 assessment powers ( 3 ) . . . . . . . . . . . . 7973.6 minimum total assets available for default ( 4 ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 10973.1 ( 1 ) cme clearing designates $ 100.0 million of corporate contributions to satisfy a clearing firm default in the event that the defaulting clearing firm 2019s guaranty contributions and performance bonds do not satisfy the deficit . ( 2 ) guaranty fund contributions of clearing firms include guaranty fund contributions required of clearing firms , but do not include any excess deposits held by us at the direction of clearing firms . ( 3 ) in the event of a clearing firm default , if a loss continues to exist after the utilization of the assets of the defaulted firm , our designated working capital and the non-defaulting clearing firms 2019 guaranty fund contributions , we have the right to assess all non-defaulting clearing members as defined in the rules governing the guaranty fund . ( 4 ) represents the aggregate minimum resources available to satisfy any obligations not met by a defaulting firm subsequent to the liquidation of the defaulting firm 2019s performance bond collateral. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>cme clearingavailable assets</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>designated corporate contributions for futures and options ( 1 )</td><td>$ 100.0</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>guaranty fund contributions ( 2 )</td><td>2899.5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>assessment powers ( 3 )</td><td>7973.6</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>minimum total assets available for default ( 4 )</td><td>$ 10973.1</td></tr></table> 2022 a financial safeguard package for cleared over-the-counter credit default swap contracts , and 2022 a financial safeguard package for cleared over-the-counter interest rate swap contracts . in the unlikely event of a payment default by a clearing firm , we would first apply assets of the defaulting clearing firm to satisfy its payment obligation . these assets include the defaulting firm 2019s guaranty fund contributions , performance bonds and any other available assets , such as assets required for membership and any associated trading rights . in addition , we would make a demand for payment pursuant to any applicable guarantee provided to us by the parent company of the clearing firm . thereafter , if the payment default remains unsatisfied , we would use the corporate contributions designated for the respective financial safeguard package . we would then use guaranty fund contributions of other clearing firms within the respective financial safeguard package and funds collected through an assessment against solvent clearing firms within the respective financial safeguard package to satisfy the deficit . we maintain a $ 5.0 billion 364-day multi-currency line of credit with a consortium of domestic and international banks to be used in certain situations by cme clearing . we have the option to request an increase in the line from $ 5.0 billion to $ 7.0 billion . we may use the proceeds to provide temporary liquidity in the unlikely event of a clearing firm default , in the event of a liquidity constraint or default by a depositary ( custodian of the collateral ) , or in the event of a temporary disruption with the payments systems that would delay payment of settlement variation between us and our clearing firms . the credit agreement requires us to pledge certain assets to the line of credit custodian prior to drawing on the line of credit . pledged assets may include clearing firm guaranty fund deposits held by us in the form of u.s . treasury or agency securities , as well as select money market mutual funds approved for our select interest earning facility ( ief ) programs . performance bond collateral of a defaulting clearing firm may also be used to secure a draw on the line . in addition to the 364-day multi- currency line of credit , we also have the option to use our $ 1.8 billion multi-currency revolving senior credit facility to provide liquidity for our clearing house in the unlikely event of default . aggregate performance bond deposits for clearing firms for all three cme financial safeguard packages was $ 86.8 billion , including $ 5.6 billion of cash performance bond deposits and $ 4.2 billion of letters of credit . a defaulting firm 2019s performance bond deposits can be used in the event of default of that clearing firm . the following shows the available assets at december 31 , 2012 in the event of a payment default by a clearing firm for the base financial safeguard package after first utilizing the defaulting firm 2019s available assets : ( in millions ) cme clearing available assets designated corporate contributions for futures and options ( 1 ) . . . . . . . . $ 100.0 guaranty fund contributions ( 2 ) . . . . . 2899.5 assessment powers ( 3 ) . . . . . . . . . . . . 7973.6 minimum total assets available for default ( 4 ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 10973.1 ( 1 ) cme clearing designates $ 100.0 million of corporate contributions to satisfy a clearing firm default in the event that the defaulting clearing firm 2019s guaranty contributions and performance bonds do not satisfy the deficit . ( 2 ) guaranty fund contributions of clearing firms include guaranty fund contributions required of clearing firms , but do not include any excess deposits held by us at the direction of clearing firms . ( 3 ) in the event of a clearing firm default , if a loss continues to exist after the utilization of the assets of the defaulted firm , our designated working capital and the non-defaulting clearing firms 2019 guaranty fund contributions , we have the right to assess all non-defaulting clearing members as defined in the rules governing the guaranty fund . ( 4 ) represents the aggregate minimum resources available to satisfy any obligations not met by a defaulting firm subsequent to the liquidation of the defaulting firm 2019s performance bond collateral. .

['2.0', '0.4']

['what was the free cash flow in 2015?', 'and what was the cash provided by operating activities in that same year?', 'how much, then, did the first represent in relation to the second?', 'and concerning that free cash flow, what was the change in it between the two previous years, from 2013 to 2014?', 'what is this change as a percent of the 2013 free cash flow?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: to , rather than as a substitute for , cash provided by operating activities . the following table reconciles cash provided by operating activities ( gaap measure ) to free cash flow ( non-gaap measure ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 7344</td><td>$ 7385</td><td>$ 6823</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cash used in investing activities</td><td>-4476 ( 4476 )</td><td>-4249 ( 4249 )</td><td>-3405 ( 3405 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dividends paid</td><td>-2344 ( 2344 )</td><td>-1632 ( 1632 )</td><td>-1333 ( 1333 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>free cash flow</td><td>$ 524</td><td>$ 1504</td><td>$ 2085</td></tr></table> 2016 outlook f0b7 safety 2013 operating a safe railroad benefits all our constituents : our employees , customers , shareholders and the communities we serve . we will continue using a multi-faceted approach to safety , utilizing technology , risk assessment , quality control , training and employee engagement , and targeted capital investments . we will continue using and expanding the deployment of total safety culture and courage to care throughout our operations , which allows us to identify and implement best practices for employee and operational safety . we will continue our efforts to increase detection of rail defects ; improve or close crossings ; and educate the public and law enforcement agencies about crossing safety through a combination of our own programs ( including risk assessment strategies ) , industry programs and local community activities across our network . f0b7 network operations 2013 in 2016 , we will continue to align resources with customer demand , continue to improve network performance , and maintain our surge capability . f0b7 fuel prices 2013 with the dramatic drop in fuel prices during 2015 , fuel price projections continue to be uncertain in the current environment . we again could see volatile fuel prices during the year , as they are sensitive to global and u.s . domestic demand , refining capacity , geopolitical events , weather conditions and other factors . as prices fluctuate , there will be a timing impact on earnings , as our fuel surcharge programs trail fluctuations in fuel price by approximately two months . continuing lower fuel prices could have a positive impact on the economy by increasing consumer discretionary spending that potentially could increase demand for various consumer products that we transport . alternatively , lower fuel prices will likely have a negative impact on other commodities such as coal , frac sand and crude oil shipments . f0b7 capital plan 2013 in 2016 , we expect our capital plan to be approximately $ 3.75 billion , including expenditures for ptc , 230 locomotives and 450 freight cars . the capital plan may be revised if business conditions warrant or if new laws or regulations affect our ability to generate sufficient returns on these investments . ( see further discussion in this item 7 under liquidity and capital resources 2013 capital plan. ) f0b7 financial expectations 2013 economic conditions in many of our market sectors continue to drive uncertainty with respect to our volume levels . we expect volumes to be down slightly in 2016 compared to 2015 , but will depend on the overall economy and market conditions . the strong u.s . dollar and historic low commodity prices could also drive continued volatility . one of the biggest uncertainties is the outlook for energy markets , which will bring both challenges and opportunities . in the current environment , we expect continued margin improvement driven by continued pricing opportunities , ongoing productivity initiatives , and the ability to leverage our resources and strengthen our franchise . over the longer term , we expect the overall u.s . economy to continue to improve at a modest pace , with some markets outperforming others. .

['524.0', '7344.0', '0.07135', '-581.0', '-0.27866']

['as of december 31, 2007, what percentage did the future principal payments of corporate debt due in 2011 represent in relation to the total ones?', 'and how much did they represent in relation to the payments due after 2012?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: before the purchase in november 2008 , the units will be reflected in diluted earnings per share calculations using the treasury stock method as defined by sfas no . 128 , earnings per share . under this method , the number of shares of common stock used in calculating diluted earnings per share ( based on the settlement formula applied at the end of the reporting period ) is deemed to be increased by the excess , if any , of the number of shares that would be issued upon settlement of the purchase contracts less the number of shares that could be purchased by the company in the market at the average market price during the period using the proceeds to be received upon settlement . therefore , dilution will occur for periods when the average market price of the company 2019s common stock for the reporting period is above $ 21.816 . senior secured revolving credit facility in september 2005 , the company entered into a $ 250 million , three-year senior secured revolving credit facility . as a result of the citadel investment in november 2007 , the facility was terminated and all unamortized debt issuance costs were expensed . corporate debt covenants certain of the company 2019s corporate debt described above have terms which include customary financial covenants . as of december 31 , 2007 , the company was in compliance with all such covenants . early extinguishment of debt in 2006 , the company called the entire remaining $ 185.2 million principal amount of its 6% ( 6 % ) notes for redemption . the company recorded a $ 0.7 million loss on early extinguishment of debt relating to the write-off of the unamortized debt offering costs . the company did not have any early extinguishments of debt in 2005 . other corporate debt the company also has multiple term loans from financial institutions . these loans are collateralized by equipment and are included within other borrowings on the consolidated balance sheet . see note 14 2014securities sold under agreement to repurchase and other borrowings . future maturities of corporate debt scheduled principal payments of corporate debt as of december 31 , 2007 are as follows ( dollars in thousands ) : years ending december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2008</td><td>$ 2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2009</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2010</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2011</td><td>453815</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2012</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>2996337</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total future principal payments of corporate debt</td><td>3450152</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>unamortized discount net</td><td>-427454 ( 427454 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>total corporate debt</td><td>$ 3022698</td></tr></table> .

['0.13153', '0.15146']

['what is the amount of long-term debt due in 2014, in thousands?', 'and what is it for 2015, also in thousands?', 'what is, then, in thousands, the total long-term debt due in those two years, combined?', 'including the debt due in 2016, what then becomes this total?', 'and how much is that in millions?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: entergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements ( a ) consists of pollution control revenue bonds and environmental revenue bonds , some of which are secured by collateral first mortgage bonds . ( b ) these notes do not have a stated interest rate , but have an implicit interest rate of 4.8% ( 4.8 % ) . ( c ) pursuant to the nuclear waste policy act of 1982 , entergy 2019s nuclear owner/licensee subsidiaries have contracts with the doe for spent nuclear fuel disposal service . the contracts include a one-time fee for generation prior to april 7 , 1983 . entergy arkansas is the only entergy company that generated electric power with nuclear fuel prior to that date and includes the one-time fee , plus accrued interest , in long-term ( d ) see note 10 to the financial statements for further discussion of the waterford 3 and grand gulf lease obligations . ( e ) the fair value excludes lease obligations of $ 149 million at entergy louisiana and $ 97 million at system energy , long-term doe obligations of $ 181 million at entergy arkansas , and the note payable to nypa of $ 95 million at entergy , and includes debt due within one year . fair values are classified as level 2 in the fair value hierarchy discussed in note 16 to the financial statements and are based on prices derived from inputs such as benchmark yields and reported trades . the annual long-term debt maturities ( excluding lease obligations and long-term doe obligations ) for debt outstanding as of december 31 , 2013 , for the next five years are as follows : amount ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>amount ( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2014</td><td>$ 385373</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2015</td><td>$ 1110566</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2016</td><td>$ 270852</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2017</td><td>$ 766801</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2018</td><td>$ 1324616</td></tr></table> in november 2000 , entergy 2019s non-utility nuclear business purchased the fitzpatrick and indian point 3 power plants in a seller-financed transaction . entergy issued notes to nypa with seven annual installments of approximately $ 108 million commencing one year from the date of the closing , and eight annual installments of $ 20 million commencing eight years from the date of the closing . these notes do not have a stated interest rate , but have an implicit interest rate of 4.8% ( 4.8 % ) . in accordance with the purchase agreement with nypa , the purchase of indian point 2 in 2001 resulted in entergy becoming liable to nypa for an additional $ 10 million per year for 10 years , beginning in september 2003 . this liability was recorded upon the purchase of indian point 2 in september 2001 . in july 2003 a payment of $ 102 million was made prior to maturity on the note payable to nypa . under a provision in a letter of credit supporting these notes , if certain of the utility operating companies or system energy were to default on other indebtedness , entergy could be required to post collateral to support the letter of credit . entergy gulf states louisiana , entergy louisiana , entergy mississippi , entergy texas , and system energy have obtained long-term financing authorizations from the ferc that extend through october 2015 . entergy arkansas has obtained long-term financing authorization from the apsc that extends through december 2015 . entergy new orleans has obtained long-term financing authorization from the city council that extends through july 2014 . capital funds agreement pursuant to an agreement with certain creditors , entergy corporation has agreed to supply system energy with sufficient capital to : 2022 maintain system energy 2019s equity capital at a minimum of 35% ( 35 % ) of its total capitalization ( excluding short- term debt ) ; .

['385373.0', '1110566.0', '1495939.0', '1766791.0', '1766.791']

['what was the percentage of sales to restaurants in 2018?', 'what was it in the previous year, 2017?', 'by what amount, then, did that percentage increase over the year?', 'and what was this increase amount in that percentage over the next year, from 2018 to 2019?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: sysco corporation a0- a0form a010-k 3 part a0i item a01 a0business we estimate that our sales by type of customer during the past three fiscal years were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>type of customer</td><td>2019</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>restaurants</td><td>62% ( 62 % )</td><td>62% ( 62 % )</td><td>61% ( 61 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>education government</td><td>9</td><td>8</td><td>9</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>travel leisure retail</td><td>9</td><td>8</td><td>9</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>healthcare</td><td>8</td><td>9</td><td>9</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other ( 1 )</td><td>12</td><td>13</td><td>12</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>totals</td><td>100% ( 100 % )</td><td>100% ( 100 % )</td><td>100% ( 100 % )</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) other includes cafeterias that are not stand-alone restaurants , bakeries , caterers , churches , civic and fraternal organizations , vending distributors , other distributors and international exports . none of these types of customers , as a group , exceeded 5% ( 5 % ) of total sales in any of the years for which information is presented . sources of supply we purchase from thousands of suppliers , both domestic and international , none of which individually accounts for more than 10% ( 10 % ) of our purchases . these suppliers consist generally of large corporations selling brand name and private label merchandise , as well as independent regional brand and private label processors and packers . we also provide specialty and seasonal products from small to mid-sized producers to meet a growing demand for locally sourced products . our locally sourced products , including produce , meats , cheese and other products , help differentiate our customers 2019 offerings , satisfy demands for new products , and support local communities . purchasing is generally carried out through both centrally developed purchasing programs , domestically and internationally , and direct purchasing programs established by our various operating companies . we administer a consolidated product procurement program designed to develop , obtain and ensure consistent quality food and non-food products . the program covers the purchasing and marketing of branded merchandise , as well as products from a number of national brand suppliers , encompassing substantially all product lines . some of our products are purchased internationally within global procurement centers in order to build strategic relationships with international suppliers and to optimize our supply chain network . sysco 2019s operating companies purchase product from the suppliers participating in these consolidated programs and from other suppliers , although sysco brand products are only available to the operating companies through these consolidated programs . we also focus on increasing profitability by lowering operating costs and by lowering aggregate inventory levels , which reduces future facility expansion needs at our broadline operating companies , while providing greater value to our suppliers and customers . working capital practices our growth is funded through a combination of cash flow from operations , commercial paper issuances and long-term borrowings . see the discussion in item 7 201cmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations - liquidity and capital resources 201d regarding our liquidity , financial position and sources and uses of funds . we extend credit terms to our customers that can vary from cash on delivery to 30 days or more based on our assessment of each customer 2019s credit worthiness . we monitor each customer 2019s account and will suspend shipments if necessary . a majority of our sales orders are filled within 24 hours of when customer orders are placed . we generally maintain inventory on hand to be able to meet customer demand . the level of inventory on hand will vary by product depending on shelf-life , supplier order fulfillment lead times and customer demand . we also make purchases of additional volumes of certain products based on supply or pricing opportunities . we take advantage of suppliers 2019 cash discounts where appropriate and otherwise generally receive payment terms from our suppliers ranging from weekly to 45 days or more . corporate headquarters and shared services center our corporate staff makes available a number of services to our operating companies and our shared services center performs support services for employees , suppliers and customers . members of these groups possess experience and expertise in , among other areas , customer and vendor contract administration , accounting and finance , treasury , legal , information technology , payroll and employee benefits , risk management and insurance , sales and marketing , merchandising , inbound logistics , human resources , strategy and tax compliance services . the corporate office also makes available supply chain expertise , such as in warehousing and distribution services , which provide assistance in operational best practices , including space utilization , energy conservation , fleet management and work flow. .

['0.62', '0.61', '0.01', '0.0']

['what is the net revenue in 2007?', 'what about in 2006?', 'what os the net change?', 'what percentage change does this represent?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: entergy texas , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to an increase in power purchases as a result of the purchased power agreements between entergy gulf states louisiana and entergy texas and an increase in the average market prices of purchased power and natural gas , substantially offset by a decrease in deferred fuel expense as a result of decreased recovery from customers of fuel costs . other regulatory charges increased primarily due to an increase of $ 6.9 million in the recovery of bond expenses related to the securitization bonds . the recovery became effective july 2007 . see note 5 to the financial statements for additional information regarding the securitization bonds . 2007 compared to 2006 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2007 to 2006 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2006 net revenue</td><td>$ 403.3</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>purchased power capacity</td><td>13.1</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>securitization transition charge</td><td>9.9</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>9.7</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>transmission revenue</td><td>6.1</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>base revenue</td><td>2.6</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>other</td><td>-2.4 ( 2.4 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>2007 net revenue</td><td>$ 442.3</td></tr></table> the purchased power capacity variance is due to changes in the purchased power capacity costs included in the calculation in 2007 compared to 2006 used to bill generation costs between entergy texas and entergy gulf states louisiana . the securitization transition charge variance is due to the issuance of securitization bonds . as discussed above , in june 2007 , egsrf i , a company wholly-owned and consolidated by entergy texas , issued securitization bonds and with the proceeds purchased from entergy texas the transition property , which is the right to recover from customers through a transition charge amounts sufficient to service the securitization bonds . see note 5 to the financial statements herein for details of the securitization bond issuance . the volume/weather variance is due to increased electricity usage on billed retail sales , including the effects of more favorable weather in 2007 compared to the same period in 2006 . the increase is also due to an increase in usage during the unbilled sales period . retail electricity usage increased a total of 139 gwh in all sectors . see "critical accounting estimates" below and note 1 to the financial statements for further discussion of the accounting for unbilled revenues . the transmission revenue variance is due to an increase in rates effective june 2007 and new transmission customers in late 2006 . the base revenue variance is due to the transition to competition rider that began in march 2006 . refer to note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rate increase . gross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory charges gross operating revenues decreased primarily due to a decrease of $ 179 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to lower fuel rates and fuel refunds . the decrease was partially offset by the $ 39 million increase in net revenue described above and an increase of $ 44 million in wholesale revenues , including $ 30 million from the system agreement cost equalization payments from entergy arkansas . the receipt of such payments is being .

['442.3', '403.3', '39.0', '0.0967']

['what is the number of shares not included in the repurchase plan?', 'what is that divided by 1000000?', 'what is that plus the number of shares authorized for repurchase?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: page 19 of 94 responded to the request for information pursuant to section 104 ( e ) of cercla . the usepa has initially estimated cleanup costs to be between $ 4 million and $ 5 million . based on the information available to the company at the present time , the company does not believe that this matter will have a material adverse effect upon the liquidity , results of operations or financial condition of the company . europe in january 2003 the german government passed legislation that imposed a mandatory deposit of 25 eurocents on all one-way packages containing beverages except milk , wine , fruit juices and certain alcoholic beverages . ball packaging europe gmbh ( bpe ) , together with certain other plaintiffs , contested the enactment of the mandatory deposit for non-returnable containers based on the german packaging regulation ( verpackungsverordnung ) in federal and state administrative court . all other proceedings have been terminated except for the determination of minimal court fees that are still outstanding in some cases , together with minimal ancillary legal fees . the relevant industries , including bpe and its competitors , have successfully set up a germany-wide return system for one-way beverage containers , which has been operational since may 1 , 2006 , the date required under the deposit legislation . item 4 . submission of matters to a vote of security holders there were no matters submitted to the security holders during the fourth quarter of 2007 . part ii item 5 . market for the registrant 2019s common stock and related stockholder matters ball corporation common stock ( bll ) is traded on the new york stock exchange and the chicago stock exchange . there were 5424 common shareholders of record on february 3 , 2008 . common stock repurchases the following table summarizes the company 2019s repurchases of its common stock during the quarter ended december 31 , 2007 . purchases of securities total number of shares purchased ( a ) average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( b ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>total number of shares purchased ( a )</td><td>average pricepaid per share</td><td>total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs</td><td>maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( b )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>october 1 to october 28 2007</td><td>705292</td><td>$ 53.53</td><td>705292</td><td>4904824</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>october 29 to november 25 2007</td><td>431170</td><td>$ 48.11</td><td>431170</td><td>4473654</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>november 26 to december 31 2007</td><td>8310 ( c )</td><td>$ 44.99</td><td>8310</td><td>4465344</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>1144772</td><td>$ 51.42</td><td>1144772</td><td></td></tr></table> ( a ) includes open market purchases and/or shares retained by the company to settle employee withholding tax liabilities . ( b ) the company has an ongoing repurchase program for which shares are authorized for repurchase from time to time by ball 2019s board of directors . on january 23 , 2008 , ball's board of directors authorized the repurchase by the company of up to a total of 12 million shares of its common stock . this repurchase authorization replaces all previous authorizations . ( c ) does not include 675000 shares under a forward share repurchase agreement entered into in december 2007 and settled on january 7 , 2008 , for approximately $ 31 million . also does not include shares to be acquired in 2008 under an accelerated share repurchase program entered into in december 2007 and funded on january 7 , 2008. .

['675000.0', '0.675', '12.675']

['what would be the payments made upon the sale of 1000 units of impella 2019s products worldwide?', 'and converted to the single digits?', 'so what was the amount paid on this final milestone in cash?', 'so what was the difference between these two values that will be paid through the issuance of common stock?', 'and as a proportion of the total payout?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: abiomed , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) note 14 . income taxes ( continued ) on april 1 , 2007 , the company adopted financial interpretation fin no . 48 , accounting for uncertainty in income taxes 2014an interpretation of fasb statement no . 109 ( 201cfin no . 48 201d ) , which clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise 2019s financial statements in accordance with fasb statement no . 109 , accounting for income taxes . fin no . 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement process for recording in the financial statements uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return . fin no . 48 also provides guidance on derecognition , classification , interest and penalties , accounting in interim periods , disclosure , and transition and defines the criteria that must be met for the benefits of a tax position to be recognized . as a result of its adoption of fin no . 48 , the company recorded the cumulative effect of the change in accounting principle of $ 0.3 million as a decrease to opening retained earnings and an increase to other long-term liabilities as of april 1 , 2007 . this adjustment related to state nexus for failure to file tax returns in various states for the years ended march 31 , 2003 , 2004 , and 2005 . the company initiated a voluntary disclosure plan , which it completed in fiscal year 2009 . the company elected to recognize interest and/or penalties related to income tax matters in income tax expense in its consolidated statements of operations . as of march 31 , 2009 , the company had remitted all outstanding amounts owed to each of the states in connection with the outstanding taxes owed at march 31 , 2008 . as such , the company had no fin no . 48 liability at march 31 , 2009 . on a quarterly basis , the company accrues for the effects of uncertain tax positions and the related potential penalties and interest . it is reasonably possible that the amount of the unrecognized tax benefit with respect to certain of the unrecognized tax positions will increase or decrease during the next 12 months ; however , it is not expected that the change will have a significant effect on the company 2019s results of operations or financial position . a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balance of unrecognized tax benefits , excluding accrued interest recorded at march 31 , 2009 ( in thousands ) is as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>balance at march 31 2008</td><td>$ 168</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>reductions for tax positions for closing of the applicable statute of limitations</td><td>-168 ( 168 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>balance at march 31 2009</td><td>$ 2014</td></tr></table> the company and its subsidiaries are subject to u.s . federal income tax , as well as income tax of multiple state and foreign jurisdictions . the company has accumulated significant losses since its inception in 1981 . all tax years remain subject to examination by major tax jurisdictions , including the federal government and the commonwealth of massachusetts . however , since the company has net operating loss and tax credit carry forwards which may be utilized in future years to offset taxable income , those years may also be subject to review by relevant taxing authorities if the carry forwards are utilized . note 15 . commitments and contingencies the company 2019s acquisition of impella provided that abiomed was required to make contingent payments to impella 2019s former shareholders as follows : 2022 upon fda approval of the impella 2.5 device , a payment of $ 5583333 2022 upon fda approval of the impella 5.0 device , a payment of $ 5583333 , and 2022 upon the sale of 1000 units of impella 2019s products worldwide , a payment of $ 5583334 . the two milestones related to sales and fda approval of the impella 2.5 device were achieved and paid prior to march 31 , 2009 . in april 2009 , the company received fda 510 ( k ) clearance of its impella 5.0 product , triggering an obligation to pay the milestone related to the impella 5.0 device . in may 2009 , the company paid $ 1.8 million of this final milestone in cash and elected to pay the remaining amount through the issuance of approximately 664612 shares of common stock. .

['5583334.0', '5.58333', '1.8', '3.78333', '0.67761']

['as of february 13, 2009, what was the average number of outstanding shares of common stock per registered holder?', 'and what was the full value of those shares?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following table presents reported quarterly high and low per share sale prices of our common stock on the new york stock exchange ( 201cnyse 201d ) for the years 2008 and 2007. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2008</td><td>high</td><td>low</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>quarter ended march 31</td><td>$ 42.72</td><td>$ 32.10</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>quarter ended june 30</td><td>46.10</td><td>38.53</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>quarter ended september 30</td><td>43.43</td><td>31.89</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>quarter ended december 31</td><td>37.28</td><td>19.35</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2007</td><td>high</td><td>low</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>quarter ended march 31</td><td>$ 41.31</td><td>$ 36.63</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>quarter ended june 30</td><td>43.84</td><td>37.64</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>quarter ended september 30</td><td>45.45</td><td>36.34</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>quarter ended december 31</td><td>46.53</td><td>40.08</td></tr></table> on february 13 , 2009 , the closing price of our common stock was $ 28.85 per share as reported on the nyse . as of february 13 , 2009 , we had 397097677 outstanding shares of common stock and 499 registered holders . dividends we have never paid a dividend on our common stock . we anticipate that we may retain future earnings , if any , to fund the development and growth of our business . the indentures governing our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior notes due 2012 ( 201c7.50% ( 201c7.50 % ) notes 201d ) and our 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) senior notes due 2012 ( 201c7.125% ( 201c7.125 % ) notes 201d ) may prohibit us from paying dividends to our stockholders unless we satisfy certain financial covenants . the loan agreement for our revolving credit facility and term loan , and the indentures governing the terms of our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes and 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes contain covenants that restrict our ability to pay dividends unless certain financial covenants are satisfied . in addition , while spectrasite and its subsidiaries are classified as unrestricted subsidiaries under the indentures for our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes and 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes , certain of spectrasite 2019s subsidiaries are subject to restrictions on the amount of cash that they can distribute to us under the loan agreement related to our securitization transaction . for more information about the restrictions under the loan agreement for the revolving credit facility and term loan , our notes indentures and the loan agreement related to our securitization transaction , see item 7 of this annual report under the caption 201cmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2014liquidity and capital resources 2014factors affecting sources of liquidity 201d and note 6 to our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report. .

['795786.92786', '13764217.57366']

['what was the operating margin in 2014?', 'and what was it in 2013?', 'what was, then, the change over the year?', 'and what is this change numerically, or as a percentage of one?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: reinsurance commissions , fees and other revenue decreased 2% ( 2 % ) in 2014 reflecting a 1% ( 1 % ) unfavorable impact from foreign currency exchange rates and 1% ( 1 % ) decline in organic revenue growth due primarily to a significant unfavorable market impact in treaty , partially offset by net new business growth in treaty placements globally and growth in capital markets transactions and advisory business , as well as facultative placements . operating income operating income increased $ 108 million , or 7% ( 7 % ) , from 2013 to $ 1.6 billion in 2014 . in 2014 , operating income margins in this segment were 21.0% ( 21.0 % ) , an increase of 120 basis points from 19.8% ( 19.8 % ) in 2013 . operating margin improvement was driven by solid organic revenue growth , return on investments , expense discipline and savings related to the restructuring programs , partially offset by a $ 61 million unfavorable impact from foreign currency exchange rates . hr solutions . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>years ended december 31</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>revenue</td><td>$ 4264</td><td>$ 4057</td><td>$ 3925</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating income</td><td>485</td><td>318</td><td>289</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margin</td><td>11.4% ( 11.4 % )</td><td>7.8% ( 7.8 % )</td><td>7.4% ( 7.4 % )</td></tr></table> our hr solutions segment generated approximately 35% ( 35 % ) of our consolidated total revenues in 2014 and provides a broad range of human capital services , as follows : 2022 retirement specializes in global actuarial services , defined contribution consulting , tax and erisa consulting , and pension administration . 2022 compensation focuses on compensatory advisory/counsel including : compensation planning design , executive reward strategies , salary survey and benchmarking , market share studies and sales force effectiveness , with special expertise in the financial services and technology industries . 2022 strategic human capital delivers advice to complex global organizations on talent , change and organizational effectiveness issues , including talent strategy and acquisition , executive on-boarding , performance management , leadership assessment and development , communication strategy , workforce training and change management . 2022 investment consulting advises public and private companies , other institutions and trustees on developing and maintaining investment programs across a broad range of plan types , including defined benefit plans , defined contribution plans , endowments and foundations . 2022 benefits administration applies our human resource expertise primarily through defined benefit ( pension ) , defined contribution ( 401 ( k ) ) , and health and welfare administrative services . our model replaces the resource-intensive processes once required to administer benefit plans with more efficient , effective , and less costly solutions . 2022 exchanges is building and operating healthcare exchanges that provide employers with a cost effective alternative to traditional employee and retiree healthcare , while helping individuals select the insurance that best meets their needs . 2022 human resource business processing outsourcing provides market-leading solutions to manage employee data ; administer benefits , payroll and other human resources processes ; and record and manage talent , workforce and other core human resource process transactions as well as other complementary services such as flexible spending , dependent audit and participant advocacy . disruption in the global credit markets and the deterioration of the financial markets created significant uncertainty in the marketplace . weak economic conditions in many markets around the globe continued throughout 2014 and have adversely impacted our clients' financial condition and therefore the levels of business activities in the industries and geographies where we operate . while we believe that the majority of our practices are well positioned to manage through this time , these challenges are reducing demand for some of our services and putting continued pressure on the pricing of those services , which is having an adverse effect on our new business and results of operations. .

['0.114', '0.078', '0.036', '3.6']

['what is the expected annual dividends per share in 2007?', 'what about in 2006?', 'what is the net change?', 'what percentage change does this represent?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: stock-based awards under the plan stock options 2013 marathon grants stock options under the 2007 plan and previously granted options under the 2003 plan . marathon 2019s stock options represent the right to purchase shares of common stock at the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant . through 2004 , certain stock options were granted under the 2003 plan with a tandem stock appreciation right , which allows the recipient to instead elect to receive cash and/or common stock equal to the excess of the fair market value of shares of common stock , as determined in accordance with the 2003 plan , over the option price of the shares . in general , stock options granted under the 2007 plan and the 2003 plan vest ratably over a three-year period and have a maximum term of ten years from the date they are granted . stock appreciation rights 2013 prior to 2005 , marathon granted sars under the 2003 plan . no stock appreciation rights have been granted under the 2007 plan . similar to stock options , stock appreciation rights represent the right to receive a payment equal to the excess of the fair market value of shares of common stock on the date the right is exercised over the grant price . under the 2003 plan , certain sars were granted as stock-settled sars and others were granted in tandem with stock options . in general , sars granted under the 2003 plan vest ratably over a three-year period and have a maximum term of ten years from the date they are granted . stock-based performance awards 2013 prior to 2005 , marathon granted stock-based performance awards under the 2003 plan . no stock-based performance awards have been granted under the 2007 plan . beginning in 2005 , marathon discontinued granting stock-based performance awards and instead now grants cash-settled performance units to officers . all stock-based performance awards granted under the 2003 plan have either vested or been forfeited . as a result , there are no outstanding stock-based performance awards . restricted stock 2013 marathon grants restricted stock and restricted stock units under the 2007 plan and previously granted such awards under the 2003 plan . in 2005 , the compensation committee began granting time-based restricted stock to certain u.s.-based officers of marathon and its consolidated subsidiaries as part of their annual long-term incentive package . the restricted stock awards to officers vest three years from the date of grant , contingent on the recipient 2019s continued employment . marathon also grants restricted stock to certain non-officer employees and restricted stock units to certain international employees ( 201crestricted stock awards 201d ) , based on their performance within certain guidelines and for retention purposes . the restricted stock awards to non-officers generally vest in one-third increments over a three-year period , contingent on the recipient 2019s continued employment . prior to vesting , all restricted stock recipients have the right to vote such stock and receive dividends thereon . the non-vested shares are not transferable and are held by marathon 2019s transfer agent . common stock units 2013 marathon maintains an equity compensation program for its non-employee directors under the 2007 plan and previously maintained such a program under the 2003 plan . all non-employee directors other than the chairman receive annual grants of common stock units , and they are required to hold those units until they leave the board of directors . when dividends are paid on marathon common stock , directors receive dividend equivalents in the form of additional common stock units . stock-based compensation expense 2013 total employee stock-based compensation expense was $ 80 million , $ 83 million and $ 111 million in 2007 , 2006 and 2005 . the total related income tax benefits were $ 29 million , $ 31 million and $ 39 million . in 2007 and 2006 , cash received upon exercise of stock option awards was $ 27 million and $ 50 million . tax benefits realized for deductions during 2007 and 2006 that were in excess of the stock-based compensation expense recorded for options exercised and other stock-based awards vested during the period totaled $ 30 million and $ 36 million . cash settlements of stock option awards totaled $ 1 million and $ 3 million in 2007 and 2006 . stock option awards granted 2013 during 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , marathon granted stock option awards to both officer and non-officer employees . the weighted average grant date fair value of these awards was based on the following black-scholes assumptions: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>weighted average exercise price per share</td><td>$ 60.94</td><td>$ 37.84</td><td>$ 25.14</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>expected annual dividends per share</td><td>$ 0.96</td><td>$ 0.80</td><td>$ 0.66</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>expected life in years</td><td>5.0</td><td>5.1</td><td>5.5</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>expected volatility</td><td>27% ( 27 % )</td><td>28% ( 28 % )</td><td>28% ( 28 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>risk-free interest rate</td><td>4.1% ( 4.1 % )</td><td>5.0% ( 5.0 % )</td><td>3.8% ( 3.8 % )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>weighted average grant date fair value of stock option awards granted</td><td>$ 17.24</td><td>$ 10.19</td><td>$ 6.15</td></tr></table> .

['0.96', '0.66', '0.3', '0.45455']

['what were operating profits in 2012?', 'what were they in 2011?', 'what is the net change?', 'what was the 2011 value?', 'what is the net change over the 2011 value?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: 2011 compared to 2010 mst 2019s net sales for 2011 decreased $ 311 million , or 4% ( 4 % ) , compared to 2010 . the decrease was attributable to decreased volume of approximately $ 390 million for certain ship and aviation system programs ( primarily maritime patrol aircraft and ptds ) and approximately $ 75 million for training and logistics solutions programs . partially offsetting these decreases was higher sales of about $ 165 million from production on the lcs program . mst 2019s operating profit for 2011 decreased $ 68 million , or 10% ( 10 % ) , compared to 2010 . the decrease was attributable to decreased operating profit of approximately $ 55 million as a result of increased reserves for contract cost matters on various ship and aviation system programs ( including the terminated presidential helicopter program ) and approximately $ 40 million due to lower volume and increased reserves on training and logistics solutions . partially offsetting these decreases was higher operating profit of approximately $ 30 million in 2011 primarily due to the recognition of reserves on certain undersea systems programs in 2010 . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit rate adjustments described above , were approximately $ 55 million lower in 2011 compared to 2010 . backlog backlog increased in 2012 compared to 2011 mainly due to increased orders on ship and aviation system programs ( primarily mh-60 and lcs ) , partially offset decreased orders and higher sales volume on integrated warfare systems and sensors programs ( primarily aegis ) . backlog decreased slightly in 2011 compared to 2010 primarily due to higher sales volume on various integrated warfare systems and sensors programs . trends we expect mst 2019s net sales to decline in 2013 in the low single digit percentage range as compared to 2012 due to the completion of ptds deliveries in 2012 and expected lower volume on training services programs . operating profit and margin are expected to increase slightly from 2012 levels primarily due to anticipated improved contract performance . space systems our space systems business segment is engaged in the research and development , design , engineering , and production of satellites , strategic and defensive missile systems , and space transportation systems . space systems is also responsible for various classified systems and services in support of vital national security systems . space systems 2019 major programs include the space-based infrared system ( sbirs ) , advanced extremely high frequency ( aehf ) system , mobile user objective system ( muos ) , global positioning satellite ( gps ) iii system , geostationary operational environmental satellite r-series ( goes-r ) , trident ii d5 fleet ballistic missile , and orion . operating results for our space systems business segment include our equity interests in united launch alliance ( ula ) , which provides expendable launch services for the u.s . government , united space alliance ( usa ) , which provided processing activities for the space shuttle program and is winding down following the completion of the last space shuttle mission in 2011 , and a joint venture that manages the u.k . 2019s atomic weapons establishment program . space systems 2019 operating results included the following ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 8347</td><td>$ 8161</td><td>$ 8268</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>1083</td><td>1063</td><td>1030</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margins</td><td>13.0% ( 13.0 % )</td><td>13.0% ( 13.0 % )</td><td>12.5% ( 12.5 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>backlog at year-end</td><td>18100</td><td>16000</td><td>17800</td></tr></table> 2012 compared to 2011 space systems 2019 net sales for 2012 increased $ 186 million , or 2% ( 2 % ) , compared to 2011 . the increase was attributable to higher net sales of approximately $ 150 million due to increased commercial satellite deliveries ( two commercial satellites delivered in 2012 compared to one during 2011 ) ; about $ 125 million from the orion program due to higher volume and an increase in risk retirements ; and approximately $ 70 million from increased volume on various strategic and defensive missile programs . partially offsetting the increases were lower net sales of approximately $ 105 million from certain government satellite programs ( primarily sbirs and muos ) as a result of decreased volume and a decline in risk retirements ; and about $ 55 million from the nasa external tank program , which ended in connection with the completion of the space shuttle program in 2011. .

['1083.0', '1063.0', '20.0', '1063.0', '0.01881']

['what is the value of european industrial packaging net sales for 2007 times 1000?', 'what is that divided by total 2007 sales?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: tissue pulp due to strong market demand , partic- ularly from asia . average sales price realizations improved significantly in 2007 , principally reflecting higher average prices for softwood , hardwood and fluff pulp . operating earnings in 2007 were $ 104 mil- lion compared with $ 48 million in 2006 and $ 37 mil- lion in 2005 . the benefits from higher sales price realizations were partially offset by increased input costs for energy , chemicals and freight . entering the first quarter of 2008 , demand for market pulp remains strong , and average sales price realiza- tions should increase slightly . however , input costs for energy , chemicals and freight are expected to be higher , and increased spending is anticipated for planned mill maintenance outages . industrial packaging demand for industrial packaging products is closely correlated with non-durable industrial goods pro- duction , as well as with demand for processed foods , poultry , meat and agricultural products . in addition to prices and volumes , major factors affecting the profitability of industrial packaging are raw material and energy costs , freight costs , manufacturing effi- ciency and product mix . industrial packaging net sales for 2007 increased 6% ( 6 % ) to $ 5.2 billion compared with $ 4.9 bil- lion in 2006 , and 13% ( 13 % ) compared with $ 4.6 billion in 2005 . operating profits in 2007 were 26% ( 26 % ) higher than in 2006 and more than double 2005 earnings . bene- fits from improved price realizations ( $ 147 million ) , sales volume increases net of increased lack of order downtime ( $ 3 million ) , a more favorable mix ( $ 31 million ) , strong mill and converting operations ( $ 33 million ) and other costs ( $ 47 million ) were partially offset by the effects of higher raw material costs ( $ 76 million ) and higher freight costs ( $ 18 million ) . in addition , a gain of $ 13 million was recognized in 2006 related to a sale of property in spain and costs of $ 52 million were incurred in 2007 related to the conversion of the paper machine at pensacola to production of lightweight linerboard . the segment took 165000 tons of downtime in 2007 which included 16000 tons of market-related downtime compared with 135000 tons of downtime in 2006 of which none was market-related . industrial packaging in millions 2007 2006 2005 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>sales</td><td>$ 5245</td><td>$ 4925</td><td>$ 4625</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>$ 501</td><td>$ 399</td><td>$ 219</td></tr></table> north american industrial packaging net sales for 2007 were $ 3.9 billion , compared with $ 3.7 billion in 2006 and $ 3.6 billion in 2005 . operating profits in 2007 were $ 407 million , up from $ 327 mil- lion in 2006 and $ 170 million in 2005 . containerboard shipments were higher in 2007 compared with 2006 , including production from the paper machine at pensacola that was converted to lightweight linerboard during 2007 . average sales price realizations were significantly higher than in 2006 reflecting price increases announced early in 2006 and in the third quarter of 2007 . margins improved reflecting stronger export demand . manu- facturing performance was strong , although costs associated with planned mill maintenance outages were higher due to timing of outages . raw material costs for wood , energy , chemicals and recycled fiber increased significantly . operating results for 2007 were also unfavorably impacted by $ 52 million of costs associated with the conversion and startup of the pensacola paper machine . u.s . converting sales volumes were slightly lower in 2007 compared with 2006 reflecting softer customer box demand . earnings improvement in 2007 bene- fited from the realization of box price increases announced in early 2006 and late 2007 . favorable manufacturing operations and higher sales prices for waste fiber more than offset significantly higher raw material and freight costs . looking ahead to the first quarter of 2008 , sales volumes are expected to increase slightly , and results should benefit from a full-quarter impact of the price increases announced in the third quarter of 2007 . however , additional mill maintenance outages are planned for the first quarter , and freight and input costs are expected to rise , particularly for wood and energy . manufacturing operations should be favorable compared with the fourth quarter . european industrial packaging net sales for 2007 were $ 1.1 billion , up from $ 1.0 billion in 2006 and $ 880 million in 2005 . sales volumes were about flat as early stronger demand in the industrial segment weakened in the second half of the year . operating profits in 2007 were $ 88 million compared with $ 69 million in 2006 and $ 53 million in 2005 . sales margins improved reflecting increased sales prices for boxes . conversion costs were favorable as the result of manufacturing improvement programs . entering the first quarter of 2008 , sales volumes should be strong seasonally across all regions as the winter fruit and vegetable season continues . profit margins , however , are expected to be somewhat lower. .

['1100.0', '0.20972']

['what was the fuel surcharge program freight revenue in 2014?', 'and in 2013?', 'so what was the difference between these two values?', 'so what was the percentage change during this time?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: results of operations operating revenues millions 2014 2013 2012 % ( % ) change 2014 v 2013 % ( % ) change 2013 v 2012 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>% ( % ) change 2014 v 2013</td><td>% ( % ) change 2013 v 2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>freight revenues</td><td>$ 22560</td><td>$ 20684</td><td>$ 19686</td><td>9% ( 9 % )</td><td>5% ( 5 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>other revenues</td><td>1428</td><td>1279</td><td>1240</td><td>12% ( 12 % )</td><td>3% ( 3 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total</td><td>$ 23988</td><td>$ 21963</td><td>$ 20926</td><td>9% ( 9 % )</td><td>5% ( 5 % )</td></tr></table> we generate freight revenues by transporting freight or other materials from our six commodity groups . freight revenues vary with volume ( carloads ) and average revenue per car ( arc ) . changes in price , traffic mix and fuel surcharges drive arc . we provide some of our customers with contractual incentives for meeting or exceeding specified cumulative volumes or shipping to and from specific locations , which we record as reductions to freight revenues based on the actual or projected future shipments . we recognize freight revenues as shipments move from origin to destination . we allocate freight revenues between reporting periods based on the relative transit time in each reporting period and recognize expenses as we incur them . other revenues include revenues earned by our subsidiaries , revenues from our commuter rail operations , and accessorial revenues , which we earn when customers retain equipment owned or controlled by us or when we perform additional services such as switching or storage . we recognize other revenues as we perform services or meet contractual obligations . freight revenues from all six commodity groups increased during 2014 compared to 2013 driven by 7% ( 7 % ) volume growth and core pricing gains of 2.5% ( 2.5 % ) . volume growth from grain , frac sand , rock , and intermodal ( domestic and international ) shipments offset declines in crude oil . freight revenues from five of our six commodity groups increased during 2013 compared to 2012 . revenue from agricultural products was down slightly compared to 2012 . arc increased 5% ( 5 % ) , driven by core pricing gains , shifts in business mix and an automotive logistics management arrangement . volume essentially was flat year over year as growth in automotive , frac sand , crude oil and domestic intermodal offset declines in coal , international intermodal and grain shipments . our fuel surcharge programs generated freight revenues of $ 2.8 billion , $ 2.6 billion , and $ 2.6 billion in 2014 , 2013 , and 2012 , respectively . fuel surcharge in 2014 increased 6% ( 6 % ) driven by our 7% ( 7 % ) carloadings increase . fuel surcharge in 2013 essentially was flat versus 2012 as lower fuel price offset improved fuel recovery provisions and the lag effect of our programs ( surcharges trail fluctuations in fuel price by approximately two months ) . in 2014 , other revenue increased from 2013 due to higher revenues at our subsidiaries , primarily those that broker intermodal and automotive services , accessorial revenue driven by increased volume and per diem revenue for container usage ( previously included in automotive freight revenue ) . in 2013 , other revenue increased from 2012 due primarily to miscellaneous contract revenue and higher revenues at our subsidiaries that broker intermodal and automotive services. .

['2.8', '2.6', '0.2', '0.07692']

['what was the value of stock-based compensation in 2011?', 'what was it in 2010?', 'what is the ratio of 2011 to 2010?', 'what was the 2011 value?', 'what is the ratio times the 2011 value?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: notes to the consolidated financial statements unrealized currency translation adjustments related to translation of foreign denominated balance sheets are not presented net of tax given that no deferred u.s . income taxes have been provided on undistributed earnings of non- u.s . subsidiaries because they are deemed to be reinvested for an indefinite period of time . the tax ( cost ) benefit related to unrealized currency translation adjustments other than translation of foreign denominated balance sheets , for the years ended december 31 , 2011 , 2010 and 2009 was $ ( 7 ) million , $ 8 million and $ 62 million , respectively . the tax benefit related to the adjustment for pension and other postretirement benefits for the years ended december 31 , 2011 , 2010 and 2009 was $ 98 million , $ 65 million and $ 18 million , respectively . the cumulative tax benefit related to the adjustment for pension and other postretirement benefits at december 31 , 2011 and 2010 was $ 990 million and $ 889 million , respectively . the tax ( cost ) benefit related to the change in the unrealized gain ( loss ) on marketable securities for the years ended december 31 , 2011 , 2010 and 2009 was $ ( 0.2 ) million , $ 0.6 million and $ 0.1 million , respectively . the tax benefit ( cost ) related to the change in the unrealized gain ( loss ) on derivatives for the years ended december 31 , 2011 , 2010 and 2009 was $ 19 million , $ 1 million and $ ( 16 ) million , respectively . 18 . employee savings plan ppg 2019s employee savings plan ( 201csavings plan 201d ) covers substantially all u.s . employees . the company makes matching contributions to the savings plan based upon participants 2019 savings , subject to certain limitations . for most participants not covered by a collective bargaining agreement , company-matching contributions are established each year at the discretion of the company and are applied to a maximum of 6% ( 6 % ) of eligible participant compensation . for those participants whose employment is covered by a collective bargaining agreement , the level of company-matching contribution , if any , is determined by the relevant collective bargaining agreement . the company-matching contribution was 100% ( 100 % ) for the first two months of 2009 . the company-matching contribution was suspended from march 2009 through june 2010 as a cost savings measure in recognition of the adverse impact of the global recession . effective july 1 , 2010 , the company match was reinstated at 50% ( 50 % ) on the first 6% ( 6 % ) of compensation contributed for most employees eligible for the company-matching contribution feature . this included the union represented employees in accordance with their collective bargaining agreements . on january 1 , 2011 , the company match was increased to 75% ( 75 % ) on the first 6% ( 6 % ) of compensation contributed by these eligible employees . compensation expense and cash contributions related to the company match of participant contributions to the savings plan for 2011 , 2010 and 2009 totaled $ 26 million , $ 9 million and $ 7 million , respectively . a portion of the savings plan qualifies under the internal revenue code as an employee stock ownership plan . as a result , the tax deductible dividends on ppg shares held by the savings plan were $ 20 million , $ 24 million and $ 28 million for 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . 19 . other earnings ( millions ) 2011 2010 2009 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>royalty income</td><td>55</td><td>58</td><td>45</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>share of net earnings ( loss ) of equity affiliates ( see note 5 )</td><td>37</td><td>45</td><td>-5 ( 5 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>gain on sale of assets</td><td>12</td><td>8</td><td>36</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other</td><td>73</td><td>69</td><td>74</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>$ 177</td><td>$ 180</td><td>$ 150</td></tr></table> total $ 177 $ 180 $ 150 20 . stock-based compensation the company 2019s stock-based compensation includes stock options , restricted stock units ( 201crsus 201d ) and grants of contingent shares that are earned based on achieving targeted levels of total shareholder return . all current grants of stock options , rsus and contingent shares are made under the ppg industries , inc . amended and restated omnibus incentive plan ( 201cppg amended omnibus plan 201d ) , which was amended and restated effective april 21 , 2011 . shares available for future grants under the ppg amended omnibus plan were 9.7 million as of december 31 , 2011 . total stock-based compensation cost was $ 36 million , $ 52 million and $ 34 million in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . the total income tax benefit recognized in the accompanying consolidated statement of income related to the stock-based compensation was $ 13 million , $ 18 million and $ 12 million in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . stock options ppg has outstanding stock option awards that have been granted under two stock option plans : the ppg industries , inc . stock plan ( 201cppg stock plan 201d ) and the ppg amended omnibus plan . under the ppg amended omnibus plan and the ppg stock plan , certain employees of the company have been granted options to purchase shares of common stock at prices equal to the fair market value of the shares on the date the options were granted . the options are generally exercisable beginning from six to 48 months after being granted and have a maximum term of 10 years . upon exercise of a stock option , shares of company stock are issued from treasury stock . the ppg stock plan includes a restored option provision for options originally granted prior to january 1 , 2003 that 68 2011 ppg annual report and form 10-k .

['36.0', '52.0', '0.69231', '36.0', '24.92308']

['what was the difference in rent expense and certain office equipment expense under agreements between 2012 and 2013?', 'and the specific value for 2013 again?', 'so what was the growth rate over this time?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price . the 2017 notes were issued at a discount of $ 6 million , which is being amortized over their ten-year term . the company incurred approximately $ 4 million of debt issuance costs , which are being amortized over ten years . at december 31 , 2013 , $ 2 million of unamortized debt issuance costs was included in other assets on the consolidated statement of financial condition . 13 . commitments and contingencies operating lease commitments the company leases its primary office spaces under agreements that expire through 2035 . future minimum commitments under these operating leases are as follows : ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year</td><td>amount</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2014</td><td>$ 135</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2015</td><td>127</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2016</td><td>110</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2017</td><td>109</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2018</td><td>106</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>thereafter</td><td>699</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>$ 1286</td></tr></table> rent expense and certain office equipment expense under agreements amounted to $ 137 million , $ 133 million and $ 154 million in 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively . investment commitments . at december 31 , 2013 , the company had $ 216 million of various capital commitments to fund sponsored investment funds , including funds of private equity funds , real estate funds , infrastructure funds , opportunistic funds and distressed credit funds . this amount excludes additional commitments made by consolidated funds of funds to underlying third-party funds as third-party noncontrolling interest holders have the legal obligation to fund the respective commitments of such funds of funds . generally , the timing of the funding of these commitments is unknown and the commitments are callable on demand at any time prior to the expiration of the commitment . these unfunded commitments are not recorded on the consolidated statements of financial condition . these commitments do not include potential future commitments approved by the company , but which are not yet legally binding . the company intends to make additional capital commitments from time to time to fund additional investment products for , and with , its clients . contingencies contingent payments . the company acts as the portfolio manager in a series of credit default swap transactions and has a maximum potential exposure of $ 17 million under a credit default swap between the company and counterparty . see note 7 , derivatives and hedging , for further discussion . contingent payments related to business acquisitions . in connection with the credit suisse etf transaction , blackrock is required to make contingent payments annually to credit suisse , subject to achieving specified thresholds during a seven-year period , subsequent to the acquisition date . in addition , blackrock is required to make contingent payments related to the mgpa transaction during a five-year period , subject to achieving specified thresholds , subsequent to the acquisition date . the fair value of the contingent payments at december 31 , 2013 is not significant to the consolidated statement of financial condition and is included in other liabilities . legal proceedings . from time to time , blackrock receives subpoenas or other requests for information from various u.s . federal , state governmental and domestic and international regulatory authorities in connection with certain industry-wide or other investigations or proceedings . it is blackrock 2019s policy to cooperate fully with such inquiries . the company and certain of its subsidiaries have been named as defendants in various legal actions , including arbitrations and other litigation arising in connection with blackrock 2019s activities . additionally , certain blackrock- sponsored investment funds that the company manages are subject to lawsuits , any of which potentially could harm the investment returns of the applicable fund or result in the company being liable to the funds for any resulting damages . management , after consultation with legal counsel , currently does not anticipate that the aggregate liability , if any , arising out of regulatory matters or lawsuits will have a material effect on blackrock 2019s results of operations , financial position , or cash flows . however , there is no assurance as to whether any such pending or threatened matters will have a material effect on blackrock 2019s results of operations , financial position or cash flows in any future reporting period . due to uncertainties surrounding the outcome of these matters , management cannot reasonably estimate the possible loss or range of loss that may arise from these matters . indemnifications . in the ordinary course of business or in connection with certain acquisition agreements , blackrock enters into contracts pursuant to which it may agree to indemnify third parties in certain circumstances . the terms of these indemnities vary from contract to contract and the amount of indemnification liability , if any , cannot be determined or the likelihood of any liability is considered remote . consequently , no liability has been recorded on the consolidated statement of financial condition . in connection with securities lending transactions , blackrock has issued certain indemnifications to certain securities lending clients against potential loss resulting from a borrower 2019s failure to fulfill its obligations under the securities lending agreement should the value of the collateral pledged by the borrower at the time of default be insufficient to cover the borrower 2019s obligation under the securities lending agreement . at december 31 , 2013 , the company indemnified certain of its clients for their securities lending loan balances of approximately $ 118.3 billion . the company held as agent , cash and securities totaling $ 124.6 billion as collateral for indemnified securities on loan at december 31 , 2013 . the fair value of these indemnifications was not material at december 31 , 2013. .

['4.0', '133.0', '0.03008']

['what is the value of earning for non-utility nuclear in 2002?', 'what is the 2001 value?', 'what is the net change?', 'what is the 2001 value?', 'what is the net change divided by the 2001 value?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: entergy corporation and subsidiaries management's financial discussion and analysis the decrease in interest income in 2002 was primarily due to : fffd interest recognized in 2001 on grand gulf 1's decommissioning trust funds resulting from the final order addressing system energy's rate proceeding ; fffd interest recognized in 2001 at entergy mississippi and entergy new orleans on the deferred system energy costs that were not being recovered through rates ; and fffd lower interest earned on declining deferred fuel balances . the decrease in interest charges in 2002 is primarily due to : fffd a decrease of $ 31.9 million in interest on long-term debt primarily due to the retirement of long-term debt in late 2001 and early 2002 ; and fffd a decrease of $ 76.0 million in other interest expense primarily due to interest recorded on system energy's reserve for rate refund in 2001 . the refund was made in december 2001 . 2001 compared to 2000 results for the year ended december 31 , 2001 for u.s . utility were also affected by an increase in interest charges of $ 61.5 million primarily due to : fffd the final ferc order addressing the 1995 system energy rate filing ; fffd debt issued at entergy arkansas in july 2001 , at entergy gulf states in june 2000 and august 2001 , at entergy mississippi in january 2001 , and at entergy new orleans in july 2000 and february 2001 ; and fffd borrowings under credit facilities during 2001 , primarily at entergy arkansas . non-utility nuclear the increase in earnings in 2002 for non-utility nuclear from $ 128 million to $ 201 million was primarily due to the operation of indian point 2 and vermont yankee , which were purchased in september 2001 and july 2002 , respectively . the increase in earnings in 2001 for non-utility nuclear from $ 49 million to $ 128 million was primarily due to the operation of fitzpatrick and indian point 3 for a full year , as each was purchased in november 2000 , and the operation of indian point 2 , which was purchased in september 2001 . following are key performance measures for non-utility nuclear: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2002</td><td>2001</td><td>2000</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net mw in operation at december 31</td><td>3955</td><td>3445</td><td>2475</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>generation in gwh for the year</td><td>29953</td><td>22614</td><td>7171</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>capacity factor for the year</td><td>93% ( 93 % )</td><td>93% ( 93 % )</td><td>94% ( 94 % )</td></tr></table> 2002 compared to 2001 the following fluctuations in the results of operations for non-utility nuclear in 2002 were primarily caused by the acquisitions of indian point 2 and vermont yankee ( except as otherwise noted ) : fffd operating revenues increased $ 411.0 million to $ 1.2 billion ; fffd other operation and maintenance expenses increased $ 201.8 million to $ 596.3 million ; fffd depreciation and amortization expenses increased $ 25.1 million to $ 42.8 million ; fffd fuel expenses increased $ 29.4 million to $ 105.2 million ; fffd nuclear refueling outage expenses increased $ 23.9 million to $ 46.8 million , which was due primarily to a .

['201.0', '128.0', '73.0', '128.0', '0.57031']

['what is the net change in the price of the nasdaq composite from 2008 to 2012?', 'what is that over 100?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: stockholder return performance graphs the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total stockholder return on our common stock relative to the cumulative total return of the nasdaq composite index and the s&p 400 information technology index . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each index ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on december 29 , 2007 and tracks it through december 29 , 2012 . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , and s&p 400 information technology cadence design systems , inc . nasdaq composite s&p 400 information technology 12/29/1212/31/111/1/111/2/101/3/0912/29/07 *$ 100 invested on 12/29/07 in stock or 12/31/07 in index , including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright a9 2013 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>12/29/2007</td><td>1/3/2009</td><td>1/2/2010</td><td>1/1/2011</td><td>12/31/2011</td><td>12/29/2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cadence design systems inc .</td><td>100.00</td><td>22.55</td><td>35.17</td><td>48.50</td><td>61.07</td><td>78.92</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>nasdaq composite</td><td>100.00</td><td>59.03</td><td>82.25</td><td>97.32</td><td>98.63</td><td>110.78</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p 400 information technology</td><td>100.00</td><td>54.60</td><td>82.76</td><td>108.11</td><td>95.48</td><td>109.88</td></tr></table> the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance .

['10.78', '0.1078']

['what were net inventories in 2003?', 'what were they in 2002?', 'what is the ratio of 2003 to 2002?', 'what is that less 1?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: z i m m e r h o l d i n g s , i n c . a n d s u b s i d i a r i e s 2 0 0 3 f o r m 1 0 - k notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) the unaudited pro forma results for 2003 include events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying $ 90.4 million of expense related to centerpulse hip and knee value of an asset may not be recoverable . an impairment loss litigation , $ 54.4 million of cash income tax benefits as a result would be recognized when estimated future cash flows of centerpulse electing to carry back its 2002 u.s . federal net relating to the asset are less than its carrying amount . operating loss for 5 years versus 10 years , which resulted in depreciation of instruments is recognized as selling , general more losses being carried forward to future years and less and administrative expense , consistent with the classification tax credits going unutilized due to the shorter carry back of instrument cost in periods prior to january 1 , 2003 . period and an $ 8.0 million gain on sale of orquest inc. , an prior to january 1 , 2003 , undeployed instruments were investment previously held by centerpulse . the unaudited carried as a prepaid expense at cost , net of allowances for pro forma results are not necessarily indicative either of the obsolescence ( $ 54.8 million , net , at december 31 , 2002 ) , and results of operations that actually would have resulted had recognized in selling , general and administrative expense in the exchange offers been in effect at the beginning of the the year in which the instruments were placed into service . respective years or of future results . the new method of accounting for instruments was adopted to recognize the cost of these important assets of the transfx company 2019s business within the consolidated balance sheet on june 25 , 2003 , the company acquired the transfx and meaningfully allocate the cost of these assets over the external fixation system product line from immedica , inc . periods benefited , typically five years . for approximately $ 14.8 million cash , which has been the effect of the change during the year ended allocated primarily to goodwill and technology based december 31 , 2003 was to increase earnings before intangible assets . the company has sold the transfx cumulative effect of change in accounting principle by product line since early 2001 under a distribution agreement $ 26.8 million ( $ 17.8 million net of tax ) , or $ 0.08 per diluted with immedica . share . the cumulative effect adjustment of $ 55.1 million ( net of income taxes of $ 34.0 million ) to retroactively apply the implex corp . new capitalization method as if applied in years prior to 2003 on march 2 , 2004 , the company entered into an is included in earnings during the year ended december 31 , amended and restated merger agreement relating to the 2003 . the pro forma amounts shown on the consolidated acquisition of implex corp . ( 2018 2018implex 2019 2019 ) , a privately held statement of earnings have been adjusted for the effect of orthopaedics company based in new jersey , for cash . each the retroactive application on depreciation and related share of implex stock will be converted into the right to income taxes . receive cash having an aggregate value of approximately $ 108.0 million at closing and additional cash earn-out 5 . inventories payments that are contingent on the growth of implex inventories at december 31 , 2003 and 2002 , consist of product sales through 2006 . the net value transferred at the following ( in millions ) : closing will be approximately $ 89 million , which includes . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2003</td><td>2002</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>finished goods</td><td>$ 384.3</td><td>$ 206.7</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>raw materials and work in progress</td><td>90.8</td><td>50.9</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>inventory step-up</td><td>52.6</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>inventories net</td><td>$ 527.7</td><td>$ 257.6</td></tr></table> made by zimmer to implex pursuant to their existing alliance raw materials and work in progress 90.8 50.9 arrangement , escrow and other items . the acquisition will be inventory step-up 52.6 2013 accounted for under the purchase method of accounting . inventories , net $ 527.7 $ 257.6 reserves for obsolete and slow-moving inventory at4 . change in accounting principle december 31 , 2003 and 2002 were $ 47.4 million and instruments are hand held devices used by orthopaedic $ 45.5 million , respectively . provisions charged to expense surgeons during total joint replacement and other surgical were $ 11.6 million , $ 6.0 million and $ 11.9 million for the procedures . effective january 1 , 2003 , instruments are years ended december 31 , 2003 , 2002 and 2001 , respectively . recognized as long-lived assets and are included in property , amounts written off against the reserve were $ 11.7 million , plant and equipment . undeployed instruments are carried at $ 7.1 million and $ 8.5 million for the years ended cost , net of allowances for obsolescence . instruments in the december 31 , 2003 , 2002 and 2001 , respectively . field are carried at cost less accumulated depreciation . following the acquisition of centerpulse , the company depreciation is computed using the straight-line method established a common approach for estimating excess based on average estimated useful lives , determined inventory and instruments . this change in estimate resulted principally in reference to associated product life cycles , in a charge to earnings of $ 3.0 million after tax in the fourth primarily five years . in accordance with sfas no . 144 , the quarter . company reviews instruments for impairment whenever .

['527.7', '257.6', '2.04852', '1.04852']

['what was the cash provided by operating activities for 2015?', 'and in 2014?', 'so what was the difference between these two values?', 'and the value for 2014 again?', 'so what was the percentage change during this time?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: at december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , we had a modest working capital surplus . this reflects a strong cash position that provides enhanced liquidity in an uncertain economic environment . in addition , we believe we have adequate access to capital markets to meet any foreseeable cash requirements , and we have sufficient financial capacity to satisfy our current liabilities . cash flows . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 7344</td><td>$ 7385</td><td>$ 6823</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cash used in investing activities</td><td>-4476 ( 4476 )</td><td>-4249 ( 4249 )</td><td>-3405 ( 3405 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>cash used in financing activities</td><td>-3063 ( 3063 )</td><td>-2982 ( 2982 )</td><td>-3049 ( 3049 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net change in cash and cash equivalents</td><td>$ -195 ( 195 )</td><td>$ 154</td><td>$ 369</td></tr></table> operating activities cash provided by operating activities decreased in 2015 compared to 2014 due to lower net income and changes in working capital , partially offset by the timing of tax payments . federal tax law provided for 100% ( 100 % ) bonus depreciation for qualified investments made during 2011 and 50% ( 50 % ) bonus depreciation for qualified investments made during 2012-2013 . as a result , the company deferred a substantial portion of its 2011-2013 income tax expense , contributing to the positive operating cash flow in those years . congress extended 50% ( 50 % ) bonus depreciation for 2014 , but this extension occurred in december , and the related benefit was realized in 2015 , rather than 2014 . similarly , in december of 2015 , congress extended bonus depreciation through 2019 , which delayed the benefit of 2015 bonus depreciation into 2016 . bonus depreciation will be at a rate of 50% ( 50 % ) for 2015 , 2016 and 2017 , 40% ( 40 % ) for 2018 and 30% ( 30 % ) for 2019 . higher net income in 2014 increased cash provided by operating activities compared to 2013 , despite higher income tax payments . 2014 income tax payments were higher than 2013 primarily due to higher income , but also because we paid taxes previously deferred by bonus depreciation . investing activities higher capital investments in locomotives and freight cars , including $ 327 million in early lease buyouts , which we exercised due to favorable economic terms and market conditions , drove the increase in cash used in investing activities in 2015 compared to 2014 . higher capital investments , including the early buyout of the long-term operating lease of our headquarters building for approximately $ 261 million , drove the increase in cash used in investing activities in 2014 compared to 2013 . significant investments also were made for new locomotives , freight cars and containers , and capacity and commercial facility projects . capital investments in 2014 also included $ 99 million for the early buyout of locomotives and freight cars under long-term operating leases , which we exercised due to favorable economic terms and market conditions. .

['7344.0', '7385.0', '-41.0', '7385.0', '-0.00555']

['what were the total payments made for the notes entergy issued to nypa that lasted 7 years?', 'and the amount of the installment that was paid for eight years?', 'and the total amount of these installments?', 'combined, what was the sum of the notes entergy issued to nypa?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: entergy corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( d ) the bonds are subject to mandatory tender for purchase from the holders at 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount outstanding on october 1 , 2003 and will then be remarketed . ( e ) on june 1 , 2002 , entergy louisiana remarketed $ 55 million st . charles parish pollution control revenue refunding bonds due 2030 , resetting the interest rate to 4.9% ( 4.9 % ) through may 2005 . ( f ) the bonds are subject to mandatory tender for purchase from the holders at 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount outstanding on june 1 , 2005 and will then be remarketed . ( g ) the fair value excludes lease obligations , long-term doe obligations , and other long-term debt and includes debt due within one year . it is determined using bid prices reported by dealer markets and by nationally recognized investment banking firms . the annual long-term debt maturities ( excluding lease obligations ) and annual cash sinking fund requirements for debt outstanding as of december 31 , 2002 , for the next five years are as follows ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2003</td><td>$ 1150786</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2004</td><td>$ 925005</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2005</td><td>$ 540372</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2006</td><td>$ 139952</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2007</td><td>$ 475288</td></tr></table> not included are other sinking fund requirements of approximately $ 30.2 million annually , which may be satisfied by cash or by certification of property additions at the rate of 167% ( 167 % ) of such requirements . in december 2002 , when the damhead creek project was sold , the buyer of the project assumed all obligations under the damhead creek credit facilities and the damhead creek interest rate swap agreements . in november 2000 , entergy's non-utility nuclear business purchased the fitzpatrick and indian point 3 power plants in a seller-financed transaction . entergy issued notes to nypa with seven annual installments of approximately $ 108 million commencing one year from the date of the closing , and eight annual installments of $ 20 million commencing eight years from the date of the closing . these notes do not have a stated interest rate , but have an implicit interest rate of 4.8% ( 4.8 % ) . in accordance with the purchase agreement with nypa , the purchase of indian point 2 resulted in entergy's non-utility nuclear business becoming liable to nypa for an additional $ 10 million per year for 10 years , beginning in september 2003 . this liability was recorded upon the purchase of indian point 2 in september 2001 . covenants in the entergy corporation 7.75% ( 7.75 % ) notes require it to maintain a consolidated debt ratio of 65% ( 65 % ) or less of its total capitalization . if entergy's debt ratio exceeds this limit , or if entergy or certain of the domestic utility companies default on other credit facilities or are in bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings , an acceleration of the facility's maturity may occur . in january 2003 , entergy paid in full , at maturity , the outstanding debt relating to the top of iowa wind project . capital funds agreement pursuant to an agreement with certain creditors , entergy corporation has agreed to supply system energy with sufficient capital to : fffd maintain system energy's equity capital at a minimum of 35% ( 35 % ) of its total capitalization ( excluding short-term debt ) ; fffd permit the continued commercial operation of grand gulf 1 ; fffd pay in full all system energy indebtedness for borrowed money when due ; and fffd enable system energy to make payments on specific system energy debt , under supplements to the agreement assigning system energy's rights in the agreement as security for the specific debt. .

['756.0', '20.0', '160.0', '916.0']

['what is the net change in rental expense for operating leases from 2009 to 2010?', 'what percentage change does this represent?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: the future minimum lease commitments under these leases at december 31 , 2010 are as follows ( in thousands ) : years ending december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2011</td><td>$ 62465</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2012</td><td>54236</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2013</td><td>47860</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2014</td><td>37660</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2015</td><td>28622</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>79800</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>future minimum lease payments</td><td>$ 310643</td></tr></table> rental expense for operating leases was approximately $ 66.9 million , $ 57.2 million and $ 49.0 million during the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . in connection with the acquisitions of several businesses , we entered into agreements with several sellers of those businesses , some of whom became stockholders as a result of those acquisitions , for the lease of certain properties used in our operations . typical lease terms under these agreements include an initial term of five years , with three to five five-year renewal options and purchase options at various times throughout the lease periods . we also maintain the right of first refusal concerning the sale of the leased property . lease payments to an employee who became an officer of the company after the acquisition of his business were approximately $ 1.0 million , $ 0.9 million and $ 0.9 million during each of the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . we guarantee the residual values of the majority of our truck and equipment operating leases . the residual values decline over the lease terms to a defined percentage of original cost . in the event the lessor does not realize the residual value when a piece of equipment is sold , we would be responsible for a portion of the shortfall . similarly , if the lessor realizes more than the residual value when a piece of equipment is sold , we would be paid the amount realized over the residual value . had we terminated all of our operating leases subject to these guarantees at december 31 , 2010 , the guaranteed residual value would have totaled approximately $ 31.4 million . we have not recorded a liability for the guaranteed residual value of equipment under operating leases as the recovery on disposition of the equipment under the leases is expected to approximate the guaranteed residual value . litigation and related contingencies in december 2005 and may 2008 , ford global technologies , llc filed complaints with the international trade commission against us and others alleging that certain aftermarket parts imported into the u.s . infringed on ford design patents . the parties settled these matters in april 2009 pursuant to a settlement arrangement that expires in september 2011 . pursuant to the settlement , we ( and our designees ) became the sole distributor in the u.s . of aftermarket automotive parts that correspond to ford collision parts that are covered by a u.s . design patent . we have paid ford an upfront fee for these rights and will pay a royalty for each such part we sell . the amortization of the upfront fee and the royalty expenses are reflected in cost of goods sold on the accompanying consolidated statements of income . we also have certain other contingencies resulting from litigation , claims and other commitments and are subject to a variety of environmental and pollution control laws and regulations incident to the ordinary course of business . we currently expect that the resolution of such contingencies will not materially affect our financial position , results of operations or cash flows. .

['9.7', '0.16958']

['what was the change in the total debt from 2014 to 2015?', 'and what was that total debt in 2014?', 'what percentage, then, did that change represent in relation to this 2014 amount?', 'between those two years, what was, again, the variance in that total debt, in billions?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: in addition to the committed credit facilities discussed above , certain of our subsidiaries maintain short-term credit arrangements to meet their respective working capital needs . these credit arrangements , which amounted to approximately $ 2.9 billion at december 31 , 2015 , and $ 3.2 billion at december 31 , 2014 , are for the sole use of our subsidiaries . borrowings under these arrangements amounted to $ 825 million at december 31 , 2015 , and $ 1.2 billion at december 31 , 2014 . commercial paper program 2013 we have commercial paper programs in place in the u.s . and in europe . at december 31 , 2015 and december 31 , 2014 , we had no commercial paper outstanding . effective april 19 , 2013 , our commercial paper program in the u.s . was increased by $ 2.0 billion . as a result , our commercial paper programs in place in the u.s . and in europe currently have an aggregate issuance capacity of $ 8.0 billion . we expect that the existence of the commercial paper program and the committed credit facilities , coupled with our operating cash flows , will enable us to meet our liquidity requirements . sale of accounts receivable 2013 to mitigate credit risk and enhance cash and liquidity management we sell trade receivables to unaffiliated financial institutions . these arrangements allow us to sell , on an ongoing basis , certain trade receivables without recourse . the trade receivables sold are generally short-term in nature and are removed from the consolidated balance sheets . we sell trade receivables under two types of arrangements , servicing and non-servicing . pmi 2019s operating cash flows were positively impacted by the amount of the trade receivables sold and derecognized from the consolidated balance sheets , which remained outstanding with the unaffiliated financial institutions . the trade receivables sold that remained outstanding under these arrangements as of december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 were $ 888 million , $ 120 million and $ 146 million , respectively . the net proceeds received are included in cash provided by operating activities in the consolidated statements of cash flows . for further details , see item 8 , note 23 . sale of accounts receivable to our consolidated financial statements . debt 2013 our total debt was $ 28.5 billion at december 31 , 2015 , and $ 29.5 billion at december 31 , 2014 . our total debt is primarily fixed rate in nature . for further details , see item 8 , note 7 . indebtedness . the weighted-average all-in financing cost of our total debt was 3.0% ( 3.0 % ) in 2015 , compared to 3.2% ( 3.2 % ) in 2014 . see item 8 , note 16 . fair value measurements to our consolidated financial statements for a discussion of our disclosures related to the fair value of debt . the amount of debt that we can issue is subject to approval by our board of directors . on february 21 , 2014 , we filed a shelf registration statement with the u.s . securities and exchange commission , under which we may from time to time sell debt securities and/or warrants to purchase debt securities over a three-year period . our debt issuances in 2015 were as follows : ( in millions ) type face value interest rate issuance maturity u.s . dollar notes ( a ) $ 500 1.250% ( 1.250 % ) august 2015 august 2017 u.s . dollar notes ( a ) $ 750 3.375% ( 3.375 % ) august 2015 august 2025 ( a ) interest on these notes is payable annually in arrears beginning in february 2016 . the net proceeds from the sale of the securities listed in the table above will be used for general corporate purposes . the weighted-average time to maturity of our long-term debt was 10.8 years at the end of 2014 and 10.5 years at the end of 2015 . 2022 off-balance sheet arrangements and aggregate contractual obligations we have no off-balance sheet arrangements , including special purpose entities , other than guarantees and contractual obligations discussed below. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>type</td><td></td><td>face value</td><td>interest rate</td><td>issuance</td><td>maturity</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>u.s . dollar notes</td><td>( a )</td><td>$ 500</td><td>1.250% ( 1.250 % )</td><td>august 2015</td><td>august 2017</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>u.s . dollar notes</td><td>( a )</td><td>$ 750</td><td>3.375% ( 3.375 % )</td><td>august 2015</td><td>august 2025</td></tr></table> in addition to the committed credit facilities discussed above , certain of our subsidiaries maintain short-term credit arrangements to meet their respective working capital needs . these credit arrangements , which amounted to approximately $ 2.9 billion at december 31 , 2015 , and $ 3.2 billion at december 31 , 2014 , are for the sole use of our subsidiaries . borrowings under these arrangements amounted to $ 825 million at december 31 , 2015 , and $ 1.2 billion at december 31 , 2014 . commercial paper program 2013 we have commercial paper programs in place in the u.s . and in europe . at december 31 , 2015 and december 31 , 2014 , we had no commercial paper outstanding . effective april 19 , 2013 , our commercial paper program in the u.s . was increased by $ 2.0 billion . as a result , our commercial paper programs in place in the u.s . and in europe currently have an aggregate issuance capacity of $ 8.0 billion . we expect that the existence of the commercial paper program and the committed credit facilities , coupled with our operating cash flows , will enable us to meet our liquidity requirements . sale of accounts receivable 2013 to mitigate credit risk and enhance cash and liquidity management we sell trade receivables to unaffiliated financial institutions . these arrangements allow us to sell , on an ongoing basis , certain trade receivables without recourse . the trade receivables sold are generally short-term in nature and are removed from the consolidated balance sheets . we sell trade receivables under two types of arrangements , servicing and non-servicing . pmi 2019s operating cash flows were positively impacted by the amount of the trade receivables sold and derecognized from the consolidated balance sheets , which remained outstanding with the unaffiliated financial institutions . the trade receivables sold that remained outstanding under these arrangements as of december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 were $ 888 million , $ 120 million and $ 146 million , respectively . the net proceeds received are included in cash provided by operating activities in the consolidated statements of cash flows . for further details , see item 8 , note 23 . sale of accounts receivable to our consolidated financial statements . debt 2013 our total debt was $ 28.5 billion at december 31 , 2015 , and $ 29.5 billion at december 31 , 2014 . our total debt is primarily fixed rate in nature . for further details , see item 8 , note 7 . indebtedness . the weighted-average all-in financing cost of our total debt was 3.0% ( 3.0 % ) in 2015 , compared to 3.2% ( 3.2 % ) in 2014 . see item 8 , note 16 . fair value measurements to our consolidated financial statements for a discussion of our disclosures related to the fair value of debt . the amount of debt that we can issue is subject to approval by our board of directors . on february 21 , 2014 , we filed a shelf registration statement with the u.s . securities and exchange commission , under which we may from time to time sell debt securities and/or warrants to purchase debt securities over a three-year period . our debt issuances in 2015 were as follows : ( in millions ) type face value interest rate issuance maturity u.s . dollar notes ( a ) $ 500 1.250% ( 1.250 % ) august 2015 august 2017 u.s . dollar notes ( a ) $ 750 3.375% ( 3.375 % ) august 2015 august 2025 ( a ) interest on these notes is payable annually in arrears beginning in february 2016 . the net proceeds from the sale of the securities listed in the table above will be used for general corporate purposes . the weighted-average time to maturity of our long-term debt was 10.8 years at the end of 2014 and 10.5 years at the end of 2015 . 2022 off-balance sheet arrangements and aggregate contractual obligations we have no off-balance sheet arrangements , including special purpose entities , other than guarantees and contractual obligations discussed below. .

['-1.0', '29.5', '-0.0339', '-1.0']

['what was the price performance of the pmi in 2014?', 'and by what amount did it change since 2013?', 'what is this amount as a portion of that price in 2013?', 'and what was the change in the performance price of that stock for the full five years shown in the chart?', 'what is this five year change as a percent of the 2013 price?', 'and in this same period, what was that change for the s&p 500 index?', 'and what was this s&p 500 index change as a percentage of its price performance in 2013?', 'what is, then, the difference between the pmi percentage and this s&p 500 index one for the five years?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: performance graph the graph below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on pmi's common stock with the cumulative total return for the same period of pmi's peer group and the s&p 500 index . the graph assumes the investment of $ 100 as of december 31 , 2013 , in pmi common stock ( at prices quoted on the new york stock exchange ) and each of the indices as of the market close and reinvestment of dividends on a quarterly basis . date pmi pmi peer group ( 1 ) s&p 500 index . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>date</td><td>pmi</td><td>pmi peer group ( 1 )</td><td>s&p 500 index</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>december 31 2013</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 100.00</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>december 31 2014</td><td>$ 97.90</td><td>$ 107.80</td><td>$ 113.70</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>december 31 2015</td><td>$ 111.00</td><td>$ 116.80</td><td>$ 115.30</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>december 31 2016</td><td>$ 120.50</td><td>$ 118.40</td><td>$ 129.00</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>december 31 2017</td><td>$ 144.50</td><td>$ 140.50</td><td>$ 157.20</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>december 31 2018</td><td>$ 96.50</td><td>$ 127.70</td><td>$ 150.30</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) the pmi peer group presented in this graph is the same as that used in the prior year . the pmi peer group was established based on a review of four characteristics : global presence ; a focus on consumer products ; and net revenues and a market capitalization of a similar size to those of pmi . the review also considered the primary international tobacco companies . as a result of this review , the following companies constitute the pmi peer group : altria group , inc. , anheuser-busch inbev sa/nv , british american tobacco p.l.c. , the coca-cola company , colgate-palmolive co. , diageo plc , heineken n.v. , imperial brands plc , japan tobacco inc. , johnson & johnson , kimberly-clark corporation , the kraft-heinz company , mcdonald's corp. , mondel z international , inc. , nestl e9 s.a. , pepsico , inc. , the procter & gamble company , roche holding ag , and unilever nv and plc . note : figures are rounded to the nearest $ 0.10. .

['97.9', '-2.1', '-0.021', '-3.5', '-0.035', '50.3', '0.503', '0.538']

['what was revenue in 2013?', 'what was net income?', 'what is revenue less net income?', 'what was 2013 revenue?', 'what is the difference of revenue less net income over the 2013 revenue value?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: table of contents notes to consolidated financial statements of american airlines group inc . information generated by market transactions involving comparable assets , as well as pricing guides and other sources . the current market for the aircraft , the maintenance condition of the aircraft and the expected proceeds from the sale of the assets , among other factors , were considered . the market approach was utilized to value certain intangible assets such as airport take off and landing slots when sufficient market information was available . the income approach was primarily used to value intangible assets , including customer relationships , marketing agreements , certain international route authorities , and the us airways tradename . the income approach indicates value for a subject asset based on the present value of cash flows projected to be generated by the asset . projected cash flows are discounted at a required market rate of return that reflects the relative risk of achieving the cash flows and the time value of money . the cost approach , which estimates value by determining the current cost of replacing an asset with another of equivalent economic utility , was used , as appropriate , for certain assets for which the market and income approaches could not be applied due to the nature of the asset . the cost to replace a given asset reflects the estimated reproduction or replacement cost for the asset , less an allowance for loss in value due to depreciation . the fair value of us airways 2019 dividend miles loyalty program liability was determined based on the weighted average equivalent ticket value of outstanding miles which were expected to be redeemed for future travel at december 9 , 2013 . the weighted average equivalent ticket value contemplates differing classes of service , domestic and international itineraries and the carrier providing the award travel . pro-forma impact of the merger the company 2019s unaudited pro-forma results presented below include the effects of the merger as if it had been consummated as of january 1 , 2012 . the pro-forma results include the depreciation and amortization associated with the acquired tangible and intangible assets , lease and debt fair value adjustments , the elimination of any deferred gains or losses , adjustments relating to reflecting the fair value of the loyalty program liability and the impact of income changes on profit sharing expense , among others . in addition , the pro-forma results below reflect the impact of higher wage rates related to memorandums of understanding with us airways 2019 pilots that became effective upon closing of the merger , as well as the elimination of the company 2019s reorganization items , net and merger transition costs . however , the pro-forma results do not include any anticipated synergies or other expected benefits of the merger . accordingly , the unaudited pro-forma financial information below is not necessarily indicative of either future results of operations or results that might have been achieved had the acquisition been consummated as of january 1 , 2012 . december 31 , ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>december 31 2013 ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>revenue</td><td>$ 40678</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net income</td><td>2526</td></tr></table> 5 . basis of presentation and summary of significant accounting policies ( a ) basis of presentation the consolidated financial statements for the full years of 2015 and 2014 and the period from december 9 , 2013 to december 31 , 2013 include the accounts of the company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries . for the periods prior to december 9 , 2013 , the consolidated financial statements do not include the accounts of us airways group . all significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated . the preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the united states ( gaap ) requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities , revenues and expenses , and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements . actual results could differ from those estimates . the most significant areas .

['40678.0', '2526.0', '38152.0', '40678.0', '0.9379']

['what was the change in the balance from the start of 2010 to the end of 2012?', 'and what was the increase in 2010 on the positions assumed in acquisitions?', 'what was that increase in 2012?', 'what is, then, the total increase on the positions assumed in acquisitions for the entire period, considering there was no such increase in 2011?', 'and how much does this total increase represent in relation to that balance change over the whole three year period, in percentage?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: 19 . income taxes ( continued ) capital loss carryforwards of $ 69 million and $ 90 million , which were acquired in the bgi transaction and will expire on or before 2013 . at december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , the company had $ 95 million and $ 95 million of valuation allowances for deferred income tax assets , respectively , recorded on the consolidated statements of financial condition . the year- over-year increase in the valuation allowance primarily related to certain foreign deferred income tax assets . goodwill recorded in connection with the quellos transaction has been reduced during the period by the amount of tax benefit realized from tax-deductible goodwill . see note 9 , goodwill , for further discussion . current income taxes are recorded net in the consolidated statements of financial condition when related to the same tax jurisdiction . as of december 31 , 2012 , the company had current income taxes receivable and payable of $ 102 million and $ 121 million , respectively , recorded in other assets and accounts payable and accrued liabilities , respectively . as of december 31 , 2011 , the company had current income taxes receivable and payable of $ 108 million and $ 102 million , respectively , recorded in other assets and accounts payable and accrued liabilities , respectively . the company does not provide deferred taxes on the excess of the financial reporting over tax basis on its investments in foreign subsidiaries that are essentially permanent in duration . the excess totaled $ 2125 million and $ 1516 million as of december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively . the determination of the additional deferred income taxes on the excess has not been provided because it is not practicable due to the complexities associated with its hypothetical calculation . the following tabular reconciliation presents the total amounts of gross unrecognized tax benefits : year ended december 31 , ( dollar amounts in millions ) 2012 2011 2010 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollar amounts in millions )</td><td>year ended december 31 , 2012</td><td>year ended december 31 , 2011</td><td>year ended december 31 , 2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at january 1</td><td>$ 349</td><td>$ 307</td><td>$ 285</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>4</td><td>22</td><td>10</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>reductions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td><td>-17 ( 17 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>additions based on tax positions related to current year</td><td>69</td><td>46</td><td>35</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>lapse of statute of limitations</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>-8 ( 8 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>settlements</td><td>-29 ( 29 )</td><td>-25 ( 25 )</td><td>-2 ( 2 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>positions assumed in acquisitions</td><td>12</td><td>2014</td><td>4</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>balance at december 31</td><td>$ 404</td><td>$ 349</td><td>$ 307</td></tr></table> included in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits at december 31 , 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively , are $ 250 million , $ 226 million and $ 194 million of tax benefits that , if recognized , would affect the effective tax rate . the company recognizes interest and penalties related to income tax matters as a component of income tax expense . related to the unrecognized tax benefits noted above , the company accrued interest and penalties of $ 3 million during 2012 and in total , as of december 31 , 2012 , had recognized a liability for interest and penalties of $ 69 million . the company accrued interest and penalties of $ 10 million during 2011 and in total , as of december 31 , 2011 , had recognized a liability for interest and penalties of $ 66 million . the company accrued interest and penalties of $ 8 million during 2010 and in total , as of december 31 , 2010 , had recognized a liability for interest and penalties of $ 56 million . pursuant to the amended and restated stock purchase agreement , the company has been indemnified by barclays for $ 73 million and guggenheim for $ 6 million of unrecognized tax benefits . blackrock is subject to u.s . federal income tax , state and local income tax , and foreign income tax in multiple jurisdictions . tax years after 2007 remain open to u.s . federal income tax examination , tax years after 2005 remain open to state and local income tax examination , and tax years after 2006 remain open to income tax examination in the united kingdom . with few exceptions , as of december 31 , 2012 , the company is no longer subject to u.s . federal , state , local or foreign examinations by tax authorities for years before 2006 . the internal revenue service ( 201cirs 201d ) completed its examination of blackrock 2019s 2006 and 2007 tax years in march 2011 . in november 2011 , the irs commenced its examination of blackrock 2019s 2008 and 2009 tax years , and while the impact on the consolidated financial statements is undetermined , it is not expected to be material . in july 2011 , the irs commenced its federal income tax audit of the bgi group , which blackrock acquired in december 2009 . the tax years under examination are 2007 through december 1 , 2009 , and while the impact on the consolidated financial statements is undetermined , it is not expected to be material . the company is currently under audit in several state and local jurisdictions . the significant state and local income tax examinations are in california for tax years 2004 through 2006 , new york city for tax years 2007 through 2008 , and new jersey for tax years 2003 through 2009 . no state and local income tax audits cover years earlier than 2007 except for california , new jersey and new york city . no state and local income tax audits are expected to result in an assessment material to the consolidated financial statements. .

['119.0', '4.0', '12.0', '16.0', '0.13445']

['what was operating profit in 2011?', 'what was it in 2010?', 'what is the net change in value?', 'what is that change over the 2010 value?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: 2011 compared to 2010 mst 2019s net sales for 2011 decreased $ 311 million , or 4% ( 4 % ) , compared to 2010 . the decrease was attributable to decreased volume of approximately $ 390 million for certain ship and aviation system programs ( primarily maritime patrol aircraft and ptds ) and approximately $ 75 million for training and logistics solutions programs . partially offsetting these decreases was higher sales of about $ 165 million from production on the lcs program . mst 2019s operating profit for 2011 decreased $ 68 million , or 10% ( 10 % ) , compared to 2010 . the decrease was attributable to decreased operating profit of approximately $ 55 million as a result of increased reserves for contract cost matters on various ship and aviation system programs ( including the terminated presidential helicopter program ) and approximately $ 40 million due to lower volume and increased reserves on training and logistics solutions . partially offsetting these decreases was higher operating profit of approximately $ 30 million in 2011 primarily due to the recognition of reserves on certain undersea systems programs in 2010 . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit rate adjustments described above , were approximately $ 55 million lower in 2011 compared to 2010 . backlog backlog increased in 2012 compared to 2011 mainly due to increased orders on ship and aviation system programs ( primarily mh-60 and lcs ) , partially offset decreased orders and higher sales volume on integrated warfare systems and sensors programs ( primarily aegis ) . backlog decreased slightly in 2011 compared to 2010 primarily due to higher sales volume on various integrated warfare systems and sensors programs . trends we expect mst 2019s net sales to decline in 2013 in the low single digit percentage range as compared to 2012 due to the completion of ptds deliveries in 2012 and expected lower volume on training services programs . operating profit and margin are expected to increase slightly from 2012 levels primarily due to anticipated improved contract performance . space systems our space systems business segment is engaged in the research and development , design , engineering , and production of satellites , strategic and defensive missile systems , and space transportation systems . space systems is also responsible for various classified systems and services in support of vital national security systems . space systems 2019 major programs include the space-based infrared system ( sbirs ) , advanced extremely high frequency ( aehf ) system , mobile user objective system ( muos ) , global positioning satellite ( gps ) iii system , geostationary operational environmental satellite r-series ( goes-r ) , trident ii d5 fleet ballistic missile , and orion . operating results for our space systems business segment include our equity interests in united launch alliance ( ula ) , which provides expendable launch services for the u.s . government , united space alliance ( usa ) , which provided processing activities for the space shuttle program and is winding down following the completion of the last space shuttle mission in 2011 , and a joint venture that manages the u.k . 2019s atomic weapons establishment program . space systems 2019 operating results included the following ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 8347</td><td>$ 8161</td><td>$ 8268</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>1083</td><td>1063</td><td>1030</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margins</td><td>13.0% ( 13.0 % )</td><td>13.0% ( 13.0 % )</td><td>12.5% ( 12.5 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>backlog at year-end</td><td>18100</td><td>16000</td><td>17800</td></tr></table> 2012 compared to 2011 space systems 2019 net sales for 2012 increased $ 186 million , or 2% ( 2 % ) , compared to 2011 . the increase was attributable to higher net sales of approximately $ 150 million due to increased commercial satellite deliveries ( two commercial satellites delivered in 2012 compared to one during 2011 ) ; about $ 125 million from the orion program due to higher volume and an increase in risk retirements ; and approximately $ 70 million from increased volume on various strategic and defensive missile programs . partially offsetting the increases were lower net sales of approximately $ 105 million from certain government satellite programs ( primarily sbirs and muos ) as a result of decreased volume and a decline in risk retirements ; and about $ 55 million from the nasa external tank program , which ended in connection with the completion of the space shuttle program in 2011. .

['1063.0', '1030.0', '33.0', '0.03204']

['what was the difference in the cash capital investments in track between 2004 and 2005?', 'so what was the percentage change during this time?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: the table below details cash capital investments for the years ended december 31 , 2006 , 2005 , and 2004 . millions of dollars 2006 2005 2004 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions of dollars</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>track</td><td>$ 1487</td><td>$ 1472</td><td>$ 1328</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>capacity and commercial facilities</td><td>510</td><td>509</td><td>347</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>locomotives and freight cars</td><td>135</td><td>98</td><td>125</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other</td><td>110</td><td>90</td><td>76</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>$ 2242</td><td>$ 2169</td><td>$ 1876</td></tr></table> in 2007 , we expect our total capital investments to be approximately $ 3.2 billion , which may include long- term leases . these investments will be used to maintain track and structures , continue capacity expansions on our main lines in constrained corridors , remove bottlenecks , upgrade and augment equipment to better meet customer needs , build and improve facilities and terminals , and develop and implement new technologies . we designed these investments to maintain infrastructure for safety , enhance customer service , promote growth , and improve operational fluidity . we expect to fund our 2007 cash capital investments through cash generated from operations , the sale or lease of various operating and non-operating properties , and cash on hand at december 31 , 2006 . we expect that these sources will continue to provide sufficient funds to meet our expected capital requirements for 2007 . for the years ended december 31 , 2006 , 2005 , and 2004 , our ratio of earnings to fixed charges was 4.4 , 2.9 , and 2.1 , respectively . the increases in 2006 and 2005 were driven by higher net income . the ratio of earnings to fixed charges was computed on a consolidated basis . earnings represent income from continuing operations , less equity earnings net of distributions , plus fixed charges and income taxes . fixed charges represent interest charges , amortization of debt discount , and the estimated amount representing the interest portion of rental charges . see exhibit 12 for the calculation of the ratio of earnings to fixed charges . financing activities credit facilities 2013 on december 31 , 2006 , we had $ 2 billion in revolving credit facilities available , including $ 1 billion under a five-year facility expiring in march 2009 and $ 1 billion under a five-year facility expiring in march 2010 ( collectively , the "facilities" ) . the facilities are designated for general corporate purposes and support the issuance of commercial paper . neither of the facilities were drawn on in 2006 . commitment fees and interest rates payable under the facilities are similar to fees and rates available to comparably rated investment-grade borrowers . these facilities allow for borrowings at floating rates based on london interbank offered rates , plus a spread , depending upon our senior unsecured debt ratings . the facilities require the maintenance of a minimum net worth and a debt to net worth coverage ratio . at december 31 , 2006 , we were in compliance with these covenants . the facilities do not include any other financial restrictions , credit rating triggers ( other than rating-dependent pricing ) , or any other provision that could require the posting of collateral . in addition to our revolving credit facilities , we had $ 150 million in uncommitted lines of credit available , including $ 75 million that expires in march 2007 and $ 75 million expiring in may 2007 . neither of these lines of credit were used as of december 31 , 2006 . we must have equivalent credit available under our five-year facilities to draw on these $ 75 million lines . dividends 2013 on january 30 , 2007 , we increased the quarterly dividend to $ 0.35 per share , payable beginning on april 2 , 2007 , to shareholders of record on february 28 , 2007 . we expect to fund the increase in the quarterly dividend through cash generated from operations , the sale or lease of various operating and non-operating properties , and cash on hand at december 31 , 2006 . dividend restrictions 2013 we are subject to certain restrictions related to the payment of cash dividends to our shareholders due to minimum net worth requirements under our credit facilities . retained earnings available .

['144.0', '0.10843']

['what is the value of cadence design systems in 2006 less 100?', 'what is that difference divided by 100?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total return to shareholders of cadence design systems , inc . 2019s common stock relative to the cumulative total returns of the s & p 500 index , the nasdaq composite index and the s & p information technology index . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in the company 2019s common stock and in each of the indexes ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on december 29 , 2001 and tracks it through december 30 , 2006 . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the s & p 500 index , the nasdaq composite index and the s & p information technology index 12/30/0612/31/051/1/051/3/0412/28/0212/29/01 cadence design systems , inc . nasdaq composite s & p information technology s & p 500 * $ 100 invested on 12/29/01 in stock or on 12/31/01 in index-incuding reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright b7 2007 , standard & poor 2019s , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies , inc . all rights reserved . www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm december 29 , december 28 , january 3 , january 1 , december 31 , december 30 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>december 29 2001</td><td>december 28 2002</td><td>january 3 2004</td><td>january 1 2005</td><td>december 31 2005</td><td>december 30 2006</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cadence design systems inc .</td><td>100.00</td><td>54.38</td><td>81.52</td><td>61.65</td><td>75.54</td><td>79.96</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s & p 500</td><td>100.00</td><td>77.90</td><td>100.24</td><td>111.15</td><td>116.61</td><td>135.03</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>nasdaq composite</td><td>100.00</td><td>71.97</td><td>107.18</td><td>117.07</td><td>120.50</td><td>137.02</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>s & p information technology</td><td>100.00</td><td>62.59</td><td>92.14</td><td>94.50</td><td>95.44</td><td>103.47</td></tr></table> .

['-20.04', '-0.2004']

["what was the highest price of the company's share price for the quarter ended march 31, 2008?", 'what was the lowest price?', 'what is the net difference?', 'what was the low price?', 'what is the net difference over the low price?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following table presents reported quarterly high and low per share sale prices of our common stock on the new york stock exchange ( 201cnyse 201d ) for the years 2008 and 2007. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2008</td><td>high</td><td>low</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>quarter ended march 31</td><td>$ 42.72</td><td>$ 32.10</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>quarter ended june 30</td><td>46.10</td><td>38.53</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>quarter ended september 30</td><td>43.43</td><td>31.89</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>quarter ended december 31</td><td>37.28</td><td>19.35</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2007</td><td>high</td><td>low</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>quarter ended march 31</td><td>$ 41.31</td><td>$ 36.63</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>quarter ended june 30</td><td>43.84</td><td>37.64</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>quarter ended september 30</td><td>45.45</td><td>36.34</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>quarter ended december 31</td><td>46.53</td><td>40.08</td></tr></table> on february 13 , 2009 , the closing price of our common stock was $ 28.85 per share as reported on the nyse . as of february 13 , 2009 , we had 397097677 outstanding shares of common stock and 499 registered holders . dividends we have never paid a dividend on our common stock . we anticipate that we may retain future earnings , if any , to fund the development and growth of our business . the indentures governing our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior notes due 2012 ( 201c7.50% ( 201c7.50 % ) notes 201d ) and our 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) senior notes due 2012 ( 201c7.125% ( 201c7.125 % ) notes 201d ) may prohibit us from paying dividends to our stockholders unless we satisfy certain financial covenants . the loan agreement for our revolving credit facility and term loan , and the indentures governing the terms of our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes and 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes contain covenants that restrict our ability to pay dividends unless certain financial covenants are satisfied . in addition , while spectrasite and its subsidiaries are classified as unrestricted subsidiaries under the indentures for our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes and 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes , certain of spectrasite 2019s subsidiaries are subject to restrictions on the amount of cash that they can distribute to us under the loan agreement related to our securitization transaction . for more information about the restrictions under the loan agreement for the revolving credit facility and term loan , our notes indentures and the loan agreement related to our securitization transaction , see item 7 of this annual report under the caption 201cmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2014liquidity and capital resources 2014factors affecting sources of liquidity 201d and note 6 to our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report. .

['42.72', '32.1', '10.62', '32.1', '0.33084']

['what was the profit margin in 2015?', 'what was the ratio of the acquisition related costs recognized in 2015 to 2014?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: simplify the presentation of deferred income taxes and reduce complexity without decreasing the usefulness of information provided to users of financial statements . the adoption of this pronouncement did not have a significant impact on the company 2019s financial position , results of operations and cash flows . 3 . acquisitions endomondo on january 5 , 2015 , the company acquired 100% ( 100 % ) of the outstanding equity of endomondo , a denmark- based digital connected fitness company , to expand the under armour connected fitness community . the purchase price was $ 85.0 million , adjusted for working capital . the company recognized $ 0.6 million and $ 0.8 million in acquisition related costs that were expensed during the three months ended march 31 , 2015 and december 31 , 2014 , respectively . these costs are included in the consolidated statements of income in the line item entitled 201cselling , general and administrative expenses . 201d pro forma results are not presented , as the acquisition was not considered material to the consolidated company . myfitnesspal on march 17 , 2015 , the company acquired 100% ( 100 % ) of the outstanding equity of mfp , a digital nutrition and connected fitness company , to expand the under armour connected fitness community . the final adjusted transaction value totaled $ 474.0 million . the total consideration of $ 463.9 million was adjusted to reflect the accelerated vesting of certain share awards of mfp , which are not conditioned upon continued employment , and transaction costs borne by the selling shareholders . the acquisition was funded with $ 400.0 million of increased term loan borrowings and a draw on the revolving credit facility , with the remaining amount funded by cash on the company recognized $ 5.7 million of acquisition related costs that were expensed during the three months ended march 31 , 2015 . these costs are included in the consolidated statement of income in the line item entitled 201cselling , general and administrative expenses . 201d the following represents the pro forma consolidated income statement as if mfp had been included in the consolidated results of the company for the year ended december 31 , 2015 and december 31 , 2014: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>year ended december 31 , 2015</td><td>year ended december 31 , 2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net revenues</td><td>$ 3967008</td><td>$ 3098341</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net income</td><td>231277</td><td>189659</td></tr></table> these amounts have been calculated after applying the company 2019s accounting policies and adjusting the results of mfp to reflect the acquisition as if it closed on january 1 , 2014 . pro forma net income for the year ended december 31 , 2014 includes $ 5.7 million in transaction expenses which were included in the consolidated statement of income for the year ended december 31 , 2015 , but excluded from the calculation of pro forma net income for december 31 , 2015. .

['0.0583', '0.75']

['what was the amount paid from the long-term debt after the discounts and debt issuance costs, in millions?', 'what was, then, the value of those discounts and debt issuance costs, also in millions?', 'and how much, in percentage, does this value represent in relation to the total long-term debt in 2015, counted in millions?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: note 10 2013 debt our long-term debt consisted of the following ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>notes with rates from 1.85% ( 1.85 % ) to 3.80% ( 3.80 % ) due 2016 to 2045</td><td>$ 8150</td><td>$ 1400</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>notes with rates from 4.07% ( 4.07 % ) to 5.72% ( 5.72 % ) due 2019 to 2046</td><td>6089</td><td>3589</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>notes with rates from 6.15% ( 6.15 % ) to 9.13% ( 9.13 % ) due 2016 to 2036</td><td>1941</td><td>1941</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other debt</td><td>116</td><td>111</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total long-term debt</td><td>16296</td><td>7041</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>less : unamortized discounts and deferred financing costs</td><td>-1035 ( 1035 )</td><td>-899 ( 899 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total long-term debt net</td><td>$ 15261</td><td>$ 6142</td></tr></table> revolving credit facilities on october 9 , 2015 , we entered into a new $ 2.5 billion revolving credit facility ( the 5-year facility ) with various banks and concurrently terminated our existing $ 1.5 billion revolving credit facility , which was scheduled to expire in august 2019 . the 5-year facility , which expires on october 9 , 2020 , is available for general corporate purposes . the undrawn portion of the 5-year facility is also available to serve as a backup facility for the issuance of commercial paper . we may request and the banks may grant , at their discretion , an increase in the borrowing capacity under the 5-year facility of up to an additional $ 500 million . there were no borrowings outstanding under the 5-year facility as of and during the year ended december 31 , in contemplation of our acquisition of sikorsky , on october 9 , 2015 , we also entered into a 364-day revolving credit facility ( the 364-day facility , and together with the 5-year facility , the facilities ) with various banks that provided $ 7.0 billion of funding for general corporate purposes , including the acquisition of sikorsky . concurrent with the consummation of the sikorsky acquisition , we borrowed $ 6.0 billion under the 364-day facility . on november 23 , 2015 , we repaid all outstanding borrowings under the 364-day facility with proceeds received from an issuance of new debt ( see below ) and terminated any remaining commitments of the lenders under the 364-day facility . borrowings under the facilities bear interest at rates based , at our option , on a eurodollar rate or a base rate , as defined in the facilities 2019 agreements . each bank 2019s obligation to make loans under the 5-year facility is subject to , among other things , our compliance with various representations , warranties , and covenants , including covenants limiting our ability and certain of our subsidiaries 2019 ability to encumber assets and a covenant not to exceed a maximum leverage ratio , as defined in the five-year facility agreement . as of december 31 , 2015 , we were in compliance with all covenants contained in the 5-year facility agreement , as well as in our debt agreements . long-term debt on november 23 , 2015 , we issued $ 7.0 billion of notes ( the november 2015 notes ) in a registered public offering . we received net proceeds of $ 6.9 billion from the offering , after deducting discounts and debt issuance costs , which are being amortized as interest expense over the life of the debt . the november 2015 notes consist of : 2022 $ 750 million maturing in 2018 with a fixed interest rate of 1.85% ( 1.85 % ) ( the 2018 notes ) ; 2022 $ 1.25 billion maturing in 2020 with a fixed interest rate of 2.50% ( 2.50 % ) ( the 2020 notes ) ; 2022 $ 500 million maturing in 2023 with a fixed interest rate of 3.10% ( 3.10 % ) the 2023 notes ) ; 2022 $ 2.0 billion maturing in 2026 with a fixed interest rate of 3.55% ( 3.55 % ) ( the 2026 notes ) ; 2022 $ 500 million maturing in 2036 with a fixed interest rate of 4.50% ( 4.50 % ) ( the 2036 notes ) ; and 2022 $ 2.0 billion maturing in 2046 with a fixed interest rate of 4.70% ( 4.70 % ) ( the 2046 notes ) . we may , at our option , redeem some or all of the november 2015 notes and unpaid interest at any time by paying the principal amount of notes being redeemed plus any make-whole premium and accrued and unpaid interest to the date of redemption . interest is payable on the 2018 notes and the 2020 notes on may 23 and november 23 of each year , beginning on may 23 , 2016 ; on the 2023 notes and the 2026 notes on january 15 and july 15 of each year , beginning on july 15 , 2016 ; and on the 2036 notes and the 2046 notes on may 15 and november 15 of each year , beginning on may 15 , 2016 . the november 2015 notes rank equally in right of payment with all of our existing unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness . the proceeds of the november 2015 notes were used to repay $ 6.0 billion of borrowings under our 364-day facility and for general corporate purposes. .

['6.9', '0.1', '0.01429']

['what is the total of receivables from puerto rico?', 'what was the amount overdue?', 'what is the difference?', 'what was the total?', 'what is the difference over the total value?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: the aes corporation notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) december 31 , 2017 , 2016 , and 2015 was dispatched starting in february 2018 . aes puerto rico continues to be the lowest cost and epa compliant energy provider in puerto rico . therefore , we expect aes puerto rico to continue to be a critical supplier to prepa . starting prior to the hurricanes , prepa has been facing economic challenges that could impact the company , and on july 2 , 2017 , filed for bankruptcy under title iii . as a result of the bankruptcy filing , aes puerto rico and aes ilumina 2019s non-recourse debt of $ 365 million and $ 36 million , respectively , is in default and has been classified as current as of december 31 , 2017 . in november 2017 , aes puerto rico signed a forbearance and standstill agreement with its lenders to prevent the lenders from taking any action against the company due to the default events . this agreement will expire on march 22 , 2018 . the company's receivable balances in puerto rico as of december 31 , 2017 totaled $ 86 million , of which $ 53 million was overdue . after the filing of title iii protection , and up until the disruption caused by the hurricanes , aes in puerto rico was collecting the overdue amounts from prepa in line with historic payment patterns . considering the information available as of the filing date , management believes the carrying amount of our assets in puerto rico of $ 627 million is recoverable as of december 31 , 2017 and no reserve on the receivables is required . foreign currency risks 2014 aes operates businesses in many foreign countries and such operations could be impacted by significant fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates . fluctuations in currency exchange rate between u.s . dollar and the following currencies could create significant fluctuations in earnings and cash flows : the argentine peso , the brazilian real , the dominican republic peso , the euro , the chilean peso , the colombian peso , and the philippine peso . concentrations 2014 due to the geographical diversity of its operations , the company does not have any significant concentration of customers or sources of fuel supply . several of the company's generation businesses rely on ppas with one or a limited number of customers for the majority of , and in some cases all of , the relevant businesses' output over the term of the ppas . however , no single customer accounted for 10% ( 10 % ) or more of total revenue in 2017 , 2016 or 2015 . the cash flows and results of operations of our businesses depend on the credit quality of our customers and the continued ability of our customers and suppliers to meet their obligations under ppas and fuel supply agreements . if a substantial portion of the company's long-term ppas and/or fuel supply were modified or terminated , the company would be adversely affected to the extent that it would be unable to replace such contracts at equally favorable terms . 26 . related party transactions certain of our businesses in panama and the dominican republic are partially owned by governments either directly or through state-owned institutions . in the ordinary course of business , these businesses enter into energy purchase and sale transactions , and transmission agreements with other state-owned institutions which are controlled by such governments . at two of our generation businesses in mexico , the offtakers exercise significant influence , but not control , through representation on these businesses' boards of directors . these offtakers are also required to hold a nominal ownership interest in such businesses . in chile , we provide capacity and energy under contractual arrangements to our investment which is accounted for under the equity method of accounting . additionally , the company provides certain support and management services to several of its affiliates under various agreements . the company's consolidated statements of operations included the following transactions with related parties for the periods indicated ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>years ended december 31,</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>revenue 2014non-regulated</td><td>$ 1297</td><td>$ 1100</td><td>$ 1099</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cost of sales 2014non-regulated</td><td>220</td><td>210</td><td>330</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>interest income</td><td>8</td><td>4</td><td>25</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>interest expense</td><td>36</td><td>39</td><td>33</td></tr></table> .

['86.0', '53.0', '33.0', '86.0', '0.38372']

['what is the amount of long-term debt due in 2014?', 'what is the amount due in 2015?', 'what is the sum?', 'what is the sum divided by 1000?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: entergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements ( a ) consists of pollution control revenue bonds and environmental revenue bonds , some of which are secured by collateral first mortgage bonds . ( b ) these notes do not have a stated interest rate , but have an implicit interest rate of 4.8% ( 4.8 % ) . ( c ) pursuant to the nuclear waste policy act of 1982 , entergy 2019s nuclear owner/licensee subsidiaries have contracts with the doe for spent nuclear fuel disposal service . the contracts include a one-time fee for generation prior to april 7 , 1983 . entergy arkansas is the only entergy company that generated electric power with nuclear fuel prior to that date and includes the one-time fee , plus accrued interest , in long-term ( d ) see note 10 to the financial statements for further discussion of the waterford 3 and grand gulf lease obligations . ( e ) the fair value excludes lease obligations of $ 149 million at entergy louisiana and $ 97 million at system energy , long-term doe obligations of $ 181 million at entergy arkansas , and the note payable to nypa of $ 95 million at entergy , and includes debt due within one year . fair values are classified as level 2 in the fair value hierarchy discussed in note 16 to the financial statements and are based on prices derived from inputs such as benchmark yields and reported trades . the annual long-term debt maturities ( excluding lease obligations and long-term doe obligations ) for debt outstanding as of december 31 , 2013 , for the next five years are as follows : amount ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>amount ( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2014</td><td>$ 385373</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2015</td><td>$ 1110566</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2016</td><td>$ 270852</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2017</td><td>$ 766801</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2018</td><td>$ 1324616</td></tr></table> in november 2000 , entergy 2019s non-utility nuclear business purchased the fitzpatrick and indian point 3 power plants in a seller-financed transaction . entergy issued notes to nypa with seven annual installments of approximately $ 108 million commencing one year from the date of the closing , and eight annual installments of $ 20 million commencing eight years from the date of the closing . these notes do not have a stated interest rate , but have an implicit interest rate of 4.8% ( 4.8 % ) . in accordance with the purchase agreement with nypa , the purchase of indian point 2 in 2001 resulted in entergy becoming liable to nypa for an additional $ 10 million per year for 10 years , beginning in september 2003 . this liability was recorded upon the purchase of indian point 2 in september 2001 . in july 2003 a payment of $ 102 million was made prior to maturity on the note payable to nypa . under a provision in a letter of credit supporting these notes , if certain of the utility operating companies or system energy were to default on other indebtedness , entergy could be required to post collateral to support the letter of credit . entergy gulf states louisiana , entergy louisiana , entergy mississippi , entergy texas , and system energy have obtained long-term financing authorizations from the ferc that extend through october 2015 . entergy arkansas has obtained long-term financing authorization from the apsc that extends through december 2015 . entergy new orleans has obtained long-term financing authorization from the city council that extends through july 2014 . capital funds agreement pursuant to an agreement with certain creditors , entergy corporation has agreed to supply system energy with sufficient capital to : 2022 maintain system energy 2019s equity capital at a minimum of 35% ( 35 % ) of its total capitalization ( excluding short- term debt ) ; .

['385373.0', '1110566.0', '1495939.0', '1495.939']

['what is the net change in total commitments to extend credit and other commitments from 2017 to 2018?', 'what is the value in 2017?', 'what is the net change divided by the 2017 value?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k 155 of such other legal proceedings will have a material adverse effect on our financial position . however , we cannot now determine whether or not any claims asserted against us or others to whom we may have indemnification obligations , whether in the proceedings or other matters described above or otherwise , will have a material adverse effect on our results of operations in any future reporting period , which will depend on , among other things , the amount of the loss resulting from the claim and the amount of income otherwise reported for the reporting period . note 20 commitments in the normal course of business , we have various commitments outstanding , certain of which are not included on our consolidated balance sheet . the following table presents our outstanding commitments to extend credit along with significant other commitments as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively . table 94 : commitments to extend credit and other commitments in millions december 31 december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>december 31 2018</td><td>december 312017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>commitments to extend credit</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>total commercial lending</td><td>$ 120165</td><td>$ 112125</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>home equity lines of credit</td><td>16944</td><td>17852</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>credit card</td><td>27100</td><td>24911</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other</td><td>5069</td><td>4753</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total commitments to extend credit</td><td>169278</td><td>159641</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>net outstanding standby letters of credit ( a )</td><td>8655</td><td>8651</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>reinsurance agreements ( b )</td><td>1549</td><td>1654</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>standby bond purchase agreements ( c )</td><td>1000</td><td>843</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>other commitments ( d )</td><td>1130</td><td>1732</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>total commitments to extend credit and other commitments</td><td>$ 181612</td><td>$ 172521</td></tr></table> commitments to extend credit , or net unfunded loan commitments , represent arrangements to lend funds or provide liquidity subject to specified contractual conditions . these commitments generally have fixed expiration dates , may require payment of a fee , and generally contain termination clauses in the event the customer 2019s credit quality deteriorates . net outstanding standby letters of credit we issue standby letters of credit and share in the risk of standby letters of credit issued by other financial institutions , in each case to support obligations of our customers to third parties , such as insurance requirements and the facilitation of transactions involving capital markets product execution . approximately 91% ( 91 % ) of our net outstanding standby letters of credit were rated as pass at both december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , with the remainder rated as criticized . an internal credit rating of pass indicates the expected risk of loss is currently low , while a rating of criticized indicates a higher degree of risk . if the customer fails to meet its financial or performance obligation to the third party under the terms of the contract or there is a need to support a remarketing program , then upon a draw by a beneficiary , subject to the terms of the letter of credit , we would be obligated to make payment to them . the standby letters of credit outstanding on december 31 , 2018 had terms ranging from less than one year to six years . as of december 31 , 2018 , assets of $ 1.1 billion secured certain specifically identified standby letters of credit . in addition , a portion of the remaining standby letters of credit issued on behalf of specific customers is also secured by collateral or guarantees that secure the customers 2019 other obligations to us . the carrying amount of the liability for our obligations related to standby letters of credit and participations in standby letters of credit was $ .2 billion at december 31 , 2018 and is included in other liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet. .

['9091.0', '172521.0', '0.0527']

['what was the value of unrecognized tax benefits in 2016?', 'what was it in 2015?', 'what is the 2016 value less the 2015?', 'what is the 2015 value?', 'what is the net change over the 2015 value?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: the aes corporation notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) december 31 , 2016 , 2015 , and 2014 the following is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amounts of unrecognized tax benefits for the periods indicated ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31,</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at january 1</td><td>$ 373</td><td>$ 394</td><td>$ 392</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additions for current year tax positions</td><td>8</td><td>7</td><td>7</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>additions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>1</td><td>12</td><td>14</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>reductions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td><td>-7 ( 7 )</td><td>-2 ( 2 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>effects of foreign currency translation</td><td>2</td><td>-7 ( 7 )</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>settlements</td><td>-13 ( 13 )</td><td>-19 ( 19 )</td><td>-2 ( 2 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>lapse of statute of limitations</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td><td>-7 ( 7 )</td><td>-12 ( 12 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>balance at december 31</td><td>$ 369</td><td>$ 373</td><td>$ 394</td></tr></table> the company and certain of its subsidiaries are currently under examination by the relevant taxing authorities for various tax years . the company regularly assesses the potential outcome of these examinations in each of the taxing jurisdictions when determining the adequacy of the amount of unrecognized tax benefit recorded . while it is often difficult to predict the final outcome or the timing of resolution of any particular uncertain tax position , we believe we have appropriately accrued for our uncertain tax benefits . however , audit outcomes and the timing of audit settlements and future events that would impact our previously recorded unrecognized tax benefits and the range of anticipated increases or decreases in unrecognized tax benefits are subject to significant uncertainty . it is possible that the ultimate outcome of current or future examinations may exceed our provision for current unrecognized tax benefits in amounts that could be material , but cannot be estimated as of december 31 , 2016 . our effective tax rate and net income in any given future period could therefore be materially impacted . 22 . discontinued operations brazil distribution 2014 due to a portfolio evaluation in the first half of 2016 , management has decided to pursue a strategic shift of its distribution companies in brazil , aes sul and eletropaulo . the disposal of sul was completed in october 2016 . in december 2016 , eletropaulo underwent a corporate restructuring which is expected to , among other things , provide more liquidity of its shares . aes is continuing to pursue strategic options for eletropaulo in order to complete its strategic shift to reduce aes 2019 exposure to the brazilian distribution business , including preparation for listing its shares into the novo mercado , which is a listing segment of the brazilian stock exchange with the highest standards of corporate governance . the company executed an agreement for the sale of its wholly-owned subsidiary aes sul in june 2016 . we have reported the results of operations and financial position of aes sul as discontinued operations in the consolidated financial statements for all periods presented . upon meeting the held-for-sale criteria , the company recognized an after tax loss of $ 382 million comprised of a pretax impairment charge of $ 783 million , offset by a tax benefit of $ 266 million related to the impairment of the sul long lived assets and a tax benefit of $ 135 million for deferred taxes related to the investment in aes sul . prior to the impairment charge in the second quarter , the carrying value of the aes sul asset group of $ 1.6 billion was greater than its approximate fair value less costs to sell . however , the impairment charge was limited to the carrying value of the long lived assets of the aes sul disposal group . on october 31 , 2016 , the company completed the sale of aes sul and received final proceeds less costs to sell of $ 484 million , excluding contingent consideration . upon disposal of aes sul , we incurred an additional after- tax loss on sale of $ 737 million . the cumulative impact to earnings of the impairment and loss on sale was $ 1.1 billion . this includes the reclassification of approximately $ 1 billion of cumulative translation losses , resulting in a net reduction to the company 2019s stockholders 2019 equity of $ 92 million . sul 2019s pretax loss attributable to aes for the years ended december 31 , 2016 and 2015 was $ 1.4 billion and $ 32 million , respectively . sul 2019s pretax gain attributable to aes for the year ended december 31 , 2014 was $ 133 million . prior to its classification as discontinued operations , sul was reported in the brazil sbu reportable segment . as discussed in note 1 2014general and summary of significant accounting policies , effective july 1 , 2014 , the company prospectively adopted asu no . 2014-08 . discontinued operations prior to adoption of asu no . 2014-08 include the results of cameroon , saurashtra and various u.s . wind projects which were each sold in the first half of cameroon 2014 in september 2013 , the company executed agreements for the sale of its 56% ( 56 % ) equity interests in businesses in cameroon : sonel , an integrated utility , kribi , a gas and light fuel oil plant , and dibamba , a heavy .

['369.0', '373.0', '-4.0', '373.0', '-0.01072']

['what was the operating profit margin as adjusted in 2017?', 'and what was it in 2016?', 'what was, then, the change over the year?', 'and over the subsequent year, what was this change?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: divestiture of our arrow and moores businesses , and an unfavorable sales mix of international plumbing products , which , in aggregate , decreased sales by two percent . net sales for 2016 were positively affected by increased sales volume of plumbing products , paints and other coating products and builders' hardware . net sales for 2016 were also positively affected by favorable sales mix of cabinets and windows , and net selling price increases of north american windows and north american and international plumbing products . net sales for 2016 were negatively affected by lower sales volume of cabinets and lower net selling prices of paints and other coating products . our gross profit margins were 32.2 percent , 34.2 percent and 33.4 percent in 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . the 2018 gross profit margin was negatively impacted by an increase in commodity costs , the recognition of the inventory step up adjustment established as a part of the the acquisition of kichler , an increase in other expenses ( such as logistics costs and salaries ) and unfavorable sales mix . these negative impacts were partially offset by an increase in net selling prices , the benefits associated with cost savings initiatives , and increased sales volume . the 2017 gross profit margin was positively impacted by increased sales volume , a more favorable relationship between net selling prices and commodity costs , and cost savings initiatives . selling , general and administrative expenses as a percent of sales were 17.7 percent in 2018 compared with 18.6 percent in 2017 and 18.7 percent in 2016 . the decrease in selling , general and administrative expenses , as a percentage of sales , was driven by leverage of fixed expenses , due primarily to increased sales volume , and improved cost control . the following table reconciles reported operating profit to operating profit , as adjusted to exclude certain items , dollars in millions: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>operating profit as reported</td><td>$ 1211</td><td>$ 1194</td><td>$ 1087</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>rationalization charges</td><td>14</td><td>4</td><td>22</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>kichler inventory step up adjustment</td><td>40</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>operating profit as adjusted</td><td>$ 1265</td><td>$ 1198</td><td>$ 1109</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>operating profit margins as reported</td><td>14.5% ( 14.5 % )</td><td>15.6% ( 15.6 % )</td><td>14.8% ( 14.8 % )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>operating profit margins as adjusted</td><td>15.1% ( 15.1 % )</td><td>15.7% ( 15.7 % )</td><td>15.1% ( 15.1 % )</td></tr></table> operating profit margin in 2018 was negatively affected by an increase in commodity costs , the recognition of the inventory step up adjustment established as a part of the the acquisition of kichler and an increase in other expenses ( such as logistics costs , salaries and erp costs ) . these negative impacts were partially offset by increased net selling prices , benefits associated with cost savings initiatives and increased sales volume . operating profit margin in 2017 was positively impacted by increased sales volume , cost savings initiatives , and a more favorable relationship between net selling prices and commodity costs . operating profit margin in 2017 was negatively impacted by an increase in strategic growth investments and certain other expenses , including stock-based compensation , health insurance costs , trade show costs and increased head count . due to the recently-announced increase in tariffs on imported materials from china , and assuming tariffs rise to 25 percent in 2019 , we could be exposed to approximately $ 150 million of potential annual direct cost increases . we will work to mitigate the impact of these tariffs through a combination of price increases , supplier negotiations , supply chain repositioning and other internal productivity measures . other income ( expense ) , net other , net , for 2018 included $ 14 million of net periodic pension and post-retirement benefit cost and $ 8 million of realized foreign currency losses . these expenses were partially offset by $ 3 million of earnings related to equity method investments and $ 1 million related to distributions from private equity funds . other , net , for 2017 included $ 26 million related to periodic pension and post-retirement benefit costs , $ 13 million net loss related to the divestitures of moores and arrow and $ 2 million related to the impairment of a private equity fund , partially offset by $ 3 million related to distributions from private equity funds and $ 1 million of earnings related to equity method investments. .

['0.157', '0.151', '0.006', '-0.006']

['what was the total value of both the reserve equalization and the purchased power capacity as a change in net revenue from 2015 to 2016, in millions?', 'including the transmission revenue, what then becomes that total value?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: entergy texas , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2016 compared to 2015 net income increased $ 37.9 million primarily due to lower other operation and maintenance expenses , the asset write-off of its receivable associated with the spindletop gas storage facility in 2015 , and higher net revenue . 2015 compared to 2014 net income decreased $ 5.2 million primarily due to the asset write-off of its receivable associated with the spindletop gas storage facility and higher other operation and maintenance expenses , partially offset by higher net revenue and a lower effective tax rate . net revenue 2016 compared to 2015 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2016 to 2015 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2015 net revenue</td><td>$ 637.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>reserve equalization</td><td>14.3</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>purchased power capacity</td><td>12.4</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>transmission revenue</td><td>7.0</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>retail electric price</td><td>5.4</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>net wholesale</td><td>-27.8 ( 27.8 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>other</td><td>-4.3 ( 4.3 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>2016 net revenue</td><td>$ 644.2</td></tr></table> the reserve equalization variance is primarily due to a reduction in reserve equalization expense primarily due to changes in the entergy system generation mix compared to the same period in 2015 as a result of the execution of a new purchased power agreement and entergy mississippi 2019s exit from the system agreement , each in november 2015 , and entergy texas 2019s exit from the system agreement in august 2016 . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the system agreement . the purchased power capacity variance is primarily due to decreased expenses due to the termination of the purchased power agreements between entergy louisiana and entergy texas in august 2016 , as well as capacity cost changes for ongoing purchased power capacity contracts . the transmission revenue variance is primarily due to an increase in attachment o rates charged by miso to transmission customers and a settlement of attachment o rates previously billed to transmission customers by miso. .

['26.7', '33.7']

['what is the value of cadence design system in 2018 less an initial investment of $100?', 'what is that divided by 100?', 'what is the value of the nasdaq composite in 2018 less 100?', 'what is that divided by 100?', 'what is the difference of the cadence percent change and that of the nasdaq?']

In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response: Context: part ii . item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities our common stock is traded on the nasdaq global select market under the symbol cdns . as of february 2 , 2019 , we had 523 registered stockholders and approximately 56000 beneficial owners of our common stock . stockholder return performance graph the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total stockholder return on our common stock relative to the cumulative total return of the nasdaq composite index , the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 information technology index . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each index on december 28 , 2013 ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 and tracks it each year thereafter on the last day of our fiscal year through december 29 , 2018 and , for each index , on the last day of the calendar year . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 information technology index 12/29/181/2/16 12/30/1712/28/13 12/31/161/3/15 *$ 100 invested on 12/28/13 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . fiscal year ending december 29 . copyright a9 2019 standard & poor 2019s , a division of s&p global . all rights reserved . nasdaq compositecadence design systems , inc . s&p 500 s&p 500 information technology . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td></td><td>12/28/2013</td><td>1/3/2015</td><td>1/2/2016</td><td>12/31/2016</td><td>12/30/2017</td><td>12/29/2018</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cadence design systems inc .</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 135.18</td><td>$ 149.39</td><td>$ 181.05</td><td>$ 300.22</td><td>$ 311.13</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>nasdaq composite</td><td>100.00</td><td>112.60</td><td>113.64</td><td>133.19</td><td>172.11</td><td>165.84</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>100.00</td><td>110.28</td><td>109.54</td><td>129.05</td><td>157.22</td><td>150.33</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>s&p 500 information technology</td><td>100.00</td><td>115.49</td><td>121.08</td><td>144.85</td><td>201.10</td><td>200.52</td></tr></table> the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. .

['211.13', '2.1113', '65.84', '0.6584', '1.4529']