Datasets:
Made changes to the datacard
Browse filesFilled in more information needed to the best of my ability.
README.md
CHANGED
@@ -174,9 +174,7 @@ Processing steps included:
|
|
174 |
|
175 |
### Curation Rationale
|
176 |
|
177 |
-
|
178 |
-
|
179 |
-
The original data has some misclassified species/subspecies and some localities were outside the known range of the butterflies. Furthermore, the bird and butterfly acuities were not part of the original dataset and provide another level of analysis.
|
180 |
|
181 |
### Source Data
|
182 |
|
@@ -195,11 +193,15 @@ Photographers: Robyn Crowther and Sophie Ledger, Natural History Museum, London.
|
|
195 |
|
196 |
#### Annotation process
|
197 |
|
198 |
-
|
|
|
199 |
|
200 |
#### Who are the annotators?
|
201 |
|
202 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
203 |
|
204 |
### Personal and Sensitive Information
|
205 |
|
@@ -209,11 +211,11 @@ None
|
|
209 |
|
210 |
### Social Impact of Dataset
|
211 |
|
212 |
-
|
213 |
|
214 |
### Discussion of Biases
|
215 |
|
216 |
-
|
217 |
|
218 |
### Other Known Limitations
|
219 |
|
|
|
174 |
|
175 |
### Curation Rationale
|
176 |
|
177 |
+
What is the for?
|
|
|
|
|
178 |
|
179 |
### Source Data
|
180 |
|
|
|
193 |
|
194 |
#### Annotation process
|
195 |
|
196 |
+
The original data has some misclassified species/subspecies, and had multiple hybrid samples. These samples were removed by hand by OM, CL, JM, KK.
|
197 |
+
Some localities were outside the known range of the butterflies, and were removed using QGIS and known sub species ranges.
|
198 |
|
199 |
#### Who are the annotators?
|
200 |
|
201 |
+
Christopher Lawrence
|
202 |
+
Jim Mallet
|
203 |
+
Owen McMilan
|
204 |
+
Krystof Kozak
|
205 |
|
206 |
### Personal and Sensitive Information
|
207 |
|
|
|
211 |
|
212 |
### Social Impact of Dataset
|
213 |
|
214 |
+
N/A
|
215 |
|
216 |
### Discussion of Biases
|
217 |
|
218 |
+
Biased towards species and subspecies within Heliconius. Focused on Heliconius erato and Heliconius melpomene
|
219 |
|
220 |
### Other Known Limitations
|
221 |
|