C-G-L commited on
Commit
d783572
1 Parent(s): 643ca2c

Added information on Accuity and transformation

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +10 -3
README.md CHANGED
@@ -24,8 +24,15 @@ size_categories:
24
 
25
  ## Dataset Description
26
  Dorsal full body images of subspecies of Heliconius Erato and Heliconius Melpomene (18 subspecies total).
27
- 960 images with 320 specimens, each photographed in RGB with bird and butterfly acuity included (3 images of each specimen).
28
- Subset of images processed from Cuthill, et. al. dataset available at [doi:10.5061/dryad.2hp1978](https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.2hp1978).
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
29
 
30
  **Note:** `dorsal_images_cuthill` contains processed dorsal images from the original Cuthill dataset (all 1,234 specimens).
31
 
@@ -178,7 +185,7 @@ This dataset was curated for training a model to classify different species of H
178
  The original data (Cuthill et al 2019) had misclassified species/subspecies and some locality/ collection sites were outside the known range of the butterflies.
179
  It also contained hybrid and aberrant samples, that had the potential to muddle classification results.
180
  To prevent this, the data was further refined by several Heliconius experts to remove hybrid and aberrant samples.
181
- Lastly, bird and butterfly acuities were added to provide another level of analysis.
182
 
183
 
184
  ### Source Data
 
24
 
25
  ## Dataset Description
26
  Dorsal full body images of subspecies of Heliconius Erato and Heliconius Melpomene (18 subspecies total).
27
+ 960 images with 320 specimens
28
+ Each image is a low-resolution ("images were then cropped and resized to a height of 64 pixels (maintaining the original image aspect ratio and padded to 140 pixels wide) Hoyal-Cuthill 2019 ) photographed in RGB
29
+ Low resolution images were then transformed using AccuityView (doi: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/AcuityView/index.html,
30
+ and estimates of accuity from: http://www.empiricalimaging.com/knowledge-base/acuityview/, https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/10.1146/annurev.ento.42.1.147
31
+ Users should know that since Land 1997, more recent estimates of insect visual accuity have been created.
32
+ There are (3 images of each specimen Original/ Bird transformed/ Butterfly transformed).
33
+ This data represents a subset subset of images processed from Cuthill, et. al. dataset available at [doi:10.5061/dryad.2hp1978](https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.2hp1978).
34
+
35
+ Only Dorsal Images
36
 
37
  **Note:** `dorsal_images_cuthill` contains processed dorsal images from the original Cuthill dataset (all 1,234 specimens).
38
 
 
185
  The original data (Cuthill et al 2019) had misclassified species/subspecies and some locality/ collection sites were outside the known range of the butterflies.
186
  It also contained hybrid and aberrant samples, that had the potential to muddle classification results.
187
  To prevent this, the data was further refined by several Heliconius experts to remove hybrid and aberrant samples.
188
+ Lastly, bird and butterfly acuities were added to provide another level of analysis using AccuityView and estimates of observer accuity.
189
 
190
 
191
  ### Source Data