Datasets:
Added information on Accuity and transformation
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
@@ -24,8 +24,15 @@ size_categories:
|
|
24 |
|
25 |
## Dataset Description
|
26 |
Dorsal full body images of subspecies of Heliconius Erato and Heliconius Melpomene (18 subspecies total).
|
27 |
-
960 images with 320 specimens
|
28 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
|
30 |
**Note:** `dorsal_images_cuthill` contains processed dorsal images from the original Cuthill dataset (all 1,234 specimens).
|
31 |
|
@@ -178,7 +185,7 @@ This dataset was curated for training a model to classify different species of H
|
|
178 |
The original data (Cuthill et al 2019) had misclassified species/subspecies and some locality/ collection sites were outside the known range of the butterflies.
|
179 |
It also contained hybrid and aberrant samples, that had the potential to muddle classification results.
|
180 |
To prevent this, the data was further refined by several Heliconius experts to remove hybrid and aberrant samples.
|
181 |
-
Lastly, bird and butterfly acuities were added to provide another level of analysis.
|
182 |
|
183 |
|
184 |
### Source Data
|
|
|
24 |
|
25 |
## Dataset Description
|
26 |
Dorsal full body images of subspecies of Heliconius Erato and Heliconius Melpomene (18 subspecies total).
|
27 |
+
960 images with 320 specimens
|
28 |
+
Each image is a low-resolution ("images were then cropped and resized to a height of 64 pixels (maintaining the original image aspect ratio and padded to 140 pixels wide) Hoyal-Cuthill 2019 ) photographed in RGB
|
29 |
+
Low resolution images were then transformed using AccuityView (doi: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/AcuityView/index.html,
|
30 |
+
and estimates of accuity from: http://www.empiricalimaging.com/knowledge-base/acuityview/, https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/10.1146/annurev.ento.42.1.147
|
31 |
+
Users should know that since Land 1997, more recent estimates of insect visual accuity have been created.
|
32 |
+
There are (3 images of each specimen Original/ Bird transformed/ Butterfly transformed).
|
33 |
+
This data represents a subset subset of images processed from Cuthill, et. al. dataset available at [doi:10.5061/dryad.2hp1978](https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.2hp1978).
|
34 |
+
|
35 |
+
Only Dorsal Images
|
36 |
|
37 |
**Note:** `dorsal_images_cuthill` contains processed dorsal images from the original Cuthill dataset (all 1,234 specimens).
|
38 |
|
|
|
185 |
The original data (Cuthill et al 2019) had misclassified species/subspecies and some locality/ collection sites were outside the known range of the butterflies.
|
186 |
It also contained hybrid and aberrant samples, that had the potential to muddle classification results.
|
187 |
To prevent this, the data was further refined by several Heliconius experts to remove hybrid and aberrant samples.
|
188 |
+
Lastly, bird and butterfly acuities were added to provide another level of analysis using AccuityView and estimates of observer accuity.
|
189 |
|
190 |
|
191 |
### Source Data
|