Minor fixes

Edit for clarity and revised CLIP/OpenCLIP benchmarks.

README.md

@@ -56,8 +56,8 @@ Baseline for Random guessing is 0.3.
 | Model | | Rare Species Classification Results | |
 | ---- | :----: | :----: | :----: | 
 |          | _Zero-Shot Classification_ | _One-Shot Classification_  | _Five-Shot Classification_  |
-| CLIP         | 31.81   |   29.26    |    47.45  |
-| OpenCLIP     | 29.85    |   28.52    |    46.07  | 
+| CLIP         | 31.81   |   28.52    |   46.07   |
+| OpenCLIP     | 29.85    |   29.26   |    47.45  | 
 | BioCLIP      | **38.09** | **44.9** | **65.7** |
 | --iNat21 Only | 21.33    |   36.94    |    55.65  |
 
@@ -184,7 +184,7 @@ Samuel Stevens, Jiaman Wu, Matthew J. Thompson, and Elizabeth G. Campolongo
 
 ### Personal and Sensitive Information
 
-All animals included in this dataset are listed as Near Threatened, Vulnerable, Endangered, Critically Endangered, or Extinct in the Wild by the [IUCN Red List](https://www.iucnredlist.org/) as of July 13, 2023 (IUCN generally updates classifications twice each year (see the [IUCN Update Schedule](https://www.iucnredlist.org/assessment/updates) for more information)). However, the specific ranking is not tied to any individual, and there is no geographical information included. 
+All animals included in this dataset are listed as Near Threatened, Vulnerable, Endangered, Critically Endangered, or Extinct in the Wild by the [IUCN Red List](https://www.iucnredlist.org/) as of July 13, 2023. (IUCN generally updates classifications twice each year; see the [IUCN Update Schedule](https://www.iucnredlist.org/assessment/updates) for more information.) However, the specific ranking is not tied to any individual, and there is no geographical information included.
 
 ## Considerations for Using the Data
 ### Social Impact of Dataset