File size: 22,590 Bytes
fad35ef
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
"There are many other potential designs out there and the paper does not fully explore the potential design space before picking Bend Passwords [33]." "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non']" "paper quality"

"This brings up another issue: the PIN baseline is the current de facto standard, but other baselines (e.g., physical PIN from the previous paragraph) would position the work better and help justify use of BendyPass very different and unfamiliar interaction modality" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"

"Similar argument about the second and third paragraphs in p. 9" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"

"Overall, this paper is an interesting exploration of a novel area of computer supported brainstorming" "['non', 'non', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro']" "paper quality"

"This research is well-written and a good contribution to the area of brainstorming , and it would be interesting to get more of a complete sense of the results" "['pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"

"This will not be a revolution , but it might be of interest" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'non', 'non', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro']" "paper quality"

"The experiment procedure give little details about participants background" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"

"First of all I am unsure a pixel comparison metric is fair" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"

"What is the objective : people's perception or a metric?" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non']" "paper quality"

"What is missing is a clear articulation of the research problem and question within the literature provided" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"

"Overall, the analysis lacks clarity, rigour and situated in the literature" "['non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"

"While identifying the uniqueness of each patients medical conditions and how/why they record information is important , I think this could be greatly shortened to the most pertinent points to demonstrate the differences" "['non', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"

"The paper further assessed the tool in an exploratory study looking at usability and induced workload, with promising results" "['pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro']" "paper quality"

"ABSTRACT Abstract provides information that is ideally expected : one sentence of context, summary of contribution, explanation of system and methodology." "['non', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non']" "paper quality"

"The passive voice of the sentence does not help to identify who posited this reason : the authors of the submission or Vieira et al. [36]?" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non']" "paper quality"

"Requirement analysis was conducted through focus groups including active participation of domain experts (including involving them in sketching their desired features for data presentation)" "['pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro']" "paper quality"

"However, the form of knowledge is limited and simple" "['non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"

"The appendix includes some tests in this direction , but conclusions should not be based on material that is only available in the appendix" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"

"The GTC metric is not very well established (yet)" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"

"I have some concerns regarding their method and the experiments which are brought up in the following: Method: In a non-fully-cooperative environment, sharing hidden state entirely as the only option for communicate is not very reasonable ; I think something like sending a message is a better option and more realistic (e.g., something like the work of Mordatch & Abbeel, 2017) Experiment: The experiment ""StarCraft explore"" is similar to predator-prey; therefore, instead of explaining StarCraft explore, I would like to see how the model works in StarCraft combat" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"

"These were good data sets a few years ago and still are good data sets to test the code and sanity of the idea, but concluding anything strong based on the results obtained with them is not a good idea" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"

"The proposed method introduces a lot of complexity for very small gains" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"

"The proposed method is very simple" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"

"The improvement on test errors does not look significant" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"

"Regarding the theoretical part, I still do not follow the authors' explanation" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"

"I think it could at least be improved for clarity ." "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'non']" "paper quality"

"Please provide variance measures on your results (within model configuration, across scene examples)." "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non']" "paper quality"

"Depending on those variance numbers you might also consider doing a statistical test to argue that the auxiliary loss function and and RL fine-tuning offer certain improvement over the Scene2seq base model" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"

"Because of that, the experimental evaluation remains vague as well, as the criteria are tested on one data set by visual inspection" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"

"The experiments also talk about 2D bandit problem, and again, without any descriptions" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"

"BTW, in the Section 4.3, what does [-1, 1]^2 mean" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"

"It seems that the authors only use the basic normalizing flow structures studied in Rezende&Mohamed (2015) and Dinh et al (2016)" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"

"Some minor issues: Figure 2 is not referenced anywhere in the main text" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"

"Minor things: + The main idea is described too sketchily" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"

"Notably, these together with the ability to train the components separately will generally increase the efficiency of learning" "['non', 'non', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro']" "paper quality"

"How different are the familiar and unfamiliar instructions" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"

"I wouldn't consider the results reported in Section 4.5 to be ablative studies" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"

"The paper incorrectly references Mei et al. 2016 when stating that methods require a large amount of human supervision (data annotation) and/or linguistic knowledge." "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non']" "paper quality"

"This is not a sound mechanism to achieve an as-faithful-as-possible (limited by the expressiveness of the encoder-decoder architectures) approximation to the training data" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"

"I.e., there are two different probabilistic models modeling the same data in inconsistent ways and one or the other is used depending on the part of the system" "['non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"

"Overall, this paper is a very promising step in studying adversarial robustness , but concerns about discussion of prior work, discussion of experimental setup, and conclusions drawn, currently bar me from recommending acceptance" "['non', 'non', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non']" "paper quality"

"For example, in line 8 of Algorithm 2, why only the top 3 child nodes are added to the queue" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"

"For example, in Eq (1) what are the dimensions K and V" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"

"Under such circumstances, it is quite impossible to reproduce experiments ." "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'non']" "paper quality"

"As I understand it, real improvements in predicting clinical variables has not been shown to be reproducible so this would be a significant claim of this paper" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"

"I note that I am aware of the theoretical representation differences between directed and undirected models, I am wondering how these differences actually matter in practical applications at scale" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"

"I would like to see this curve extended until we start to see signs of overfitting" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"

"I would also like to see a comparison to CD-k, which often outperforms PCD-k" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"

"Table 3 (text classification result) does not list baselines" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"

"While this paper has some interesting experiments" "['non', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro']" "paper quality"

"In comparison to past frameworks, the approach of this paper seems less theoretically motivated" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"

"The writers have put their contributions in context well and the presentation of the paper itself is very clear" "['pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro']" "paper quality"

"The paper is well written , tghe major issue of this paper is the lack of comparison with other previous methods" "['pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"

"Therefore, the efficacy of the proposed model can not be well demontrated" "['non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"

"A way to improve the paper would be to make it clear from the beginning that these results are about Dyna-style algorithms in the Atari domain ." "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'non']" "paper quality"

"Moreover, the proposed approach is extremely simple and it is well explained in Section 2 with equations (1) and (2)." "['non', 'non', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'non', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non']" "paper quality"

"But the novelty is limited" "['non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"

"However, it is the first time that it is applied for complementing data sets and have some interesting modifications that certainly ensures novelty in the proposal" "['non', 'non', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro']" "paper quality"

"The paper is well written and describes an interesting and relatively novel approach to solving multi-class classification in a clinical domain where overlap between classes is frequently a possibility" "['pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro']" "paper quality"

"Is using a pre-trained network really helping ?" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'non']" "paper quality"

"The entire workflow is quite clear and complete" "['pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro']" "paper quality"

"The paper is not well organized" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"

"It is necessary to prove that the generated images retain their important diagnostic value" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"

"2- Two step approach combining despeckling and generative networks are reasonable for the task" "['non', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro']" "paper quality"

"3- Please provide an evidence to support the positive effect of choosing an augmentation of size 512x512 after 50 epochs in Section 3.2." "['non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'non', 'non']" "paper quality"

"For example, it is not clear what are the non-desirable artifacts, where are the eliminated nuclei and why the network has a harder time to learn" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"

"Are the results on the entire parametric maps in line with the current results" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"

"7- What is the number of parameters required for each method in Table 1?" "['non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non']" "paper quality"

"c- Quantitative results can be mentioned in the abstract ." "['non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'non']" "paper quality"

"Minor: - Testing for statistical significance is only shown in the appendix" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"

"Overall, the quality of the paper is fair" "['non', 'non', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro']" "paper quality"

"Plenty of works combine autoencoders with LSTMs" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"

"This holds for all the popular performance measures" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"

"Regardless, trying to paint others work negatively by arguments to some general issue with established performance metrics is disingenuous" "['non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"

"The experiments are clearly explained and the results are well presented." "['pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro']" "paper quality"

"Other specific suggestions: Section 2: region of interest (ROI) performing motions does not make sense to me" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"

"Now, it is difficult to connect use of prior and improvement in ECE." "['non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"

"The authors should have identified a task where networks trained on MNIST perform poorly, and then propose a different strategy or architecture" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"

"They do not make direct comparisons to previous models or study quantitatively the results of the model with respect to its parameters" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"

"Given its technical details it was reasonably straightforward to follow" "['pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro']" "paper quality"

"1) If I understand correctly, attribution is computed only for a single OSR stimulus video" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"

"Explanations are mostly complete , though some details are missing" "['pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"

"I would be curious to know if making the input weaker or only giving it to a random subset of neurons makes this phenomenon more apparent" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"

"The paper in the process reveals some (expected) results about how spiking RNNs behave on a working memory task" "['pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro']" "paper quality"