id
stringlengths 33
34
| updated
timestamp[s] | published
timestamp[s] | title
stringlengths 9
212
| summary
stringlengths 75
2.46k
| author
sequence | arxiv:doi
stringlengths 0
71
| link
list | arxiv:journal_ref
sequence | arxiv:primary_category
dict | category
sequence | content
stringlengths 0
1.25M
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
http://arxiv.org/abs/2302.13046v1 | 2023-02-25T10:08:23 | 2023-02-25T10:08:23 | In Search of Deep Learning Architectures for Load Forecasting: A
Comparative Analysis and the Impact of the Covid-19 Pandemic on Model
Performance | In power grids, short-term load forecasting (STLF) is crucial as it
contributes to the optimization of their reliability, emissions, and costs,
while it enables the participation of energy companies in the energy market.
STLF is a challenging task, due to the complex demand of active and reactive
power from multiple types of electrical loads and their dependence on numerous
exogenous variables. Amongst them, special circumstances, such as the COVID-19
pandemic, can often be the reason behind distribution shifts of load series.
This work conducts a comparative study of Deep Learning (DL) architectures,
namely Neural Basis Expansion Analysis Time Series Forecasting (N-BEATS), Long
Short-Term Memory (LSTM), and Temporal Convolutional Networks (TCN), with
respect to forecasting accuracy and training sustainability, meanwhile
examining their out-of-distribution generalization capabilities during the
COVID-19 pandemic era. A Pattern Sequence Forecasting (PSF) model is used as
baseline. The case study focuses on day-ahead forecasts for the Portuguese
national 15-minute resolution net load time series. The results can be
leveraged by energy companies and network operators (i) to reinforce their
forecasting toolkit with state-of-the-art DL models; (ii) to become aware of
the serious consequences of crisis events on model performance; (iii) as a
high-level model evaluation, deployment, and sustainability guide within a
smart grid context. | [
"Sotiris Pelekis",
"Evangelos Karakolis",
"Francisco Silva",
"Vasileios Schoinas",
"Spiros Mouzakitis",
"Georgios Kormpakis",
"Nuno Amaro",
"John Psarras"
] | 10.1109/IISA56318.2022.9904363 | [
{
"@title": "doi",
"@href": "http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/IISA56318.2022.9904363",
"@rel": "related",
"@type": null
},
{
"@title": null,
"@href": "http://arxiv.org/abs/2302.13046v1",
"@rel": "alternate",
"@type": "text/html"
},
{
"@title": "pdf",
"@href": "http://arxiv.org/pdf/2302.13046v1",
"@rel": "related",
"@type": "application/pdf"
}
] | [
"2022 13th International Conference on Information, Intelligence,\n Systems & Applications (IISA)"
] | {
"@xmlns:arxiv": "http://arxiv.org/schemas/atom",
"@term": "cs.LG",
"@scheme": "http://arxiv.org/schemas/atom"
} | [
"cs.LG",
"cs.AI"
] | 3
2
0
2
b
e
F
5
2
]
G
L
.
s
c
[
1
v
6
4
0
3
1
.
2
0
3
2
:
v
i
X
r
a
In Search of Deep Learning Architectures for Load
Forecasting: A Comparative Analysis and the
Impact of the Covid-19 Pandemic on Model
Performance
Sotiris Pelekis
Decision Support Systems Laboratory
National Technical University of
Athens, ICCS, Greece
0000-0002-9259-9115
Evangelos Karakolis
Decision Support Systems Laboratory
National Technical University of
Athens, ICCS, Greece
0000-0003-2833-3088
Francisco Silva
R&D NESTER
Lisbon, Portugal
francisco.silva@rdnester.com
Vasileios Schoinas
Decision Support Systems Laboratory
National Technical University of
Athens, Greece
0000-0001-9809-6220
Spiros Mouzakitis
Decision Support Systems Laboratory
National Technical University of
Athens, ICCS, Greece
0000-0001-9616-447X
Georgios Kormpakis
Decision Support Systems Laboratory
National Technical University of
Athens, ICCS, Greece
0000-0003-4052-4549
Nuno Amaro
R&D NESTER
Lisbon, Portugal
nuno.amaro@rdnester.com
John Psarras
Decision Support Systems Laboratory
National Technical University of
Athens, ICCS, Greece
john@epu.ntua.gr
Abstract-In power grids, short-term load forecasting (STLF)
is crucial as it contributes to the optimization of their reliability,
emissions, and costs, while it enables the participation of energy
companies in the energy market. STLF is a challenging task, due
to the complex demand of active and reactive power from mul-
tiple types of electrical loads and their dependence on numerous
exogenous variables. Amongst them, special circumstances-such
as the COVID-19 pandemic-can often be the reason behind
distribution shifts of load series. This work conducts a compara-
tive study of Deep Learning (DL) architectures-namely Neural
Basis Expansion Analysis Time Series Forecasting (N-BEATS),
Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), and Temporal Convolutional
Networks (TCN)-with respect to forecasting accuracy and train-
ing sustainability, meanwhile examining their out-of-distribution
generalization capabilities during the COVID-19 pandemic era.
A Pattern Sequence Forecasting (PSF) model is used as baseline.
The case study focuses on day-ahead forecasts for the Portuguese
national 15-minute resolution net load time series. The results can
be leveraged by energy companies and network operators (i) to
reinforce their forecasting toolkit with state-of-the-art DL models;
(ii) to become aware of the serious consequences of crisis events
on model performance; (iii) as a high-level model evaluation,
deployment, and sustainability guide within a smart grid context.
Index Terms-COVID-19, Deep Learning, LSTM, MLOps, N-
BEATS, Out-of-Distribution Generalization, Short-Term Load
Forecasting, Smart Grid, Sustainability, Temporal Convolution,
Forecasting
I. INTRODUCTION
A. Background
Electricity load forecasts are crucial in assuring the devel-
opment and optimal operation of power systems, which have
always been a significant challenge for any country regardless
of their economical state. Load forecasts, both at demand and
generation side, can serve in maintaining the balance between
load and generation, the economic power dispatch, storage
scheduling, network planning and expansion of power grids.
Recently, this task is becoming even more popular [1] and
important, especially for European countries as the energy
crisis has reached an unprecedented peak with geopolitical
extensions. According to the European Union's Institute for
Security Studies [2] the balance between the security, afford-
ability and sustainability dimensions of the energy "trilemma"
has come under serious strain and governments often resort
to disparate measures, impeding the progress of the global
energy and climate change agenda [3]. Considering the urge
to face this energy crisis, the integration of smart grids and
the high penetration of renewable energy sources (RES) has
been considered as the only way forward [4].
The stochasticity of RES, along with the privatization and
deregulation of electricity market pose severe uncertainties in
electricity load forecasts. Additionally, energy demand patterns
depend on numerous external variables such as the weather
Β© 2022 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. Permission from IEEE must be obtained for all other uses, in any current or
future media, including reprinting/republishing this material for advertising or promotional purposes, creating new collective works, for
resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or reuse of any copyrighted component of this work in other works.
conditions, energy prices [5], seasonal factors and social activ-
ities leading to complex correlations and therefore demanding
modelling for Load Forecasting (LF). The COVID-19 global
health emergency is a bright example of an occasion that
radically altered the patterns social activities for a long time
and therefore power systems operation and electricity demand
patterns [6]. These distribution shifts are projected on the
patterns of time series and definitely require either dedicated
handling depending on the nature of the utilized forecasting
technique [7], [8]. This variety of factors and events, form a
multiparametric and complex problem calling for innovative
and rigorous LF solutions with out-of-distribution generaliza-
tion capabilities [9].
Fortunately, the smart grid paradigm is, essentially, wide
open to innovative approaches enabling the integration and
exploitation of real-time and data-centric solutions powered
by Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) such
as Big Data, Internet of Things (IoT), Artificial Intelligence
(AI) and lately Machine Learning Operations (MLOps) [10]
towards harmonized network operation [11], [12]. Such tech-
nologies, and especially MLOps, have the potential to revo-
lutionize the energy sector by establishing a new paradigm
in load forecasting (LF) that goes beyond conventional model
development processes. In this context, automated and contin-
uous model training, evaluation, validation and deployment are
expected to replace the manual processes of the conventional
Machine Learning (ML) lifecycle, leading to faster and more
efficient decision making for network operators and generally
Electrical Power and Energy System (EPES) stakeholders.
LF is divided into four major categories based on the
forecasting horizon. Very short-term load forecasting (VSTLF)
addresses forecast horizons of a few minutes to a few hours.
It is mainly used for real-time control and demand response.
Electricity demand forecasts of one day to one week ahead
are known as Short-Term Load Forecasting (STLF). The
resolution of such forecasts ranges from 15-minute to hourly
and mainly serves for day-to-day operations of utilities and
participation in the electricity market. Medium-term load
forecasting (MTLF) involves demand forecasts of a week up
to a year ahead and is mainly used for maintenance scheduling
and planning of fuel purchases as well as energy trading and
revenue assessment for the utilities. Finally, long-term load
forecasting (LTLF) may involve time horizons up to 20 years
ahead and is usually linked to grid development and strategical
planning [13]. ML based STLF forms the core task of this
study and therefore the focus of the rest of this paper is shifted
towards this direction.
B. Related Work
Over the years, various forecasting approaches have been
proposed in literature for load forecasting, and specifically
Short-Term Load Forecasting (STLF). However, the studies
have been inconclusive regarding the superiority of a specific
technique as different solutions exhibit varying robustness,
complexity and requirements for computational resources. Ad-
ditionally, each time series and each forecasting technique ex-
hibit their unique characteristics depending on the use case in
question and the scope of the analysis. Forecasting models can
be divided into two basic categories, namely: (a) conventional
statistical methods and basic ML methods, b) advanced, state-
of-the-art methods that usually include Deep Learning (DL)
and, very commonly, hybrid setups. Conventional methods
usually serve as baselines.
Statistical models like linear regression have been widely
used for STLF [14], [15]. Specifically, Dudek in [16] com-
bined them with pattern-based techniques. Simpler models like
the Box-Jenkins method [17], Exponential Smoothing (ES)
[18], and nonparametric regression [19] are also common in
literature. ARIMA models [20] and their variations, such as
ARIMAX [21] and SARIMA [22], have also been an option
for STLF. Techniques like decomposition [23] are rarely used
alone, however they are often met in hybrid models [24],
such as Wavelet transformation [25]. Conventional methods
can also include simple ML approaches. These models usually
are Feed-Forward Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) [26],
[27] and Support Vector Machines (SVM) [28], [29]. Self-
Organising Maps (SOM) [30], regression trees [31], random
forests (RF) [32], gradient boosting regression trees (GBRT)
[33] and Kalman filtering [34] have been also proposed for
STLF. Ultimately, clustering approaches have proven to be
very efficient in predicting load profiles [35]. Conventional
models sometimes fail to model the nonlinear relationship
between weather and load or are susceptible to outliers [36],
however they offer simplicity and robustness [37], and can
serve as baselines.
More advanced and state-of-the art-models very often in-
clude hybrid and ensemble models. Genetic algorithms (GA)
have been widely used in order to minimize training time
[38], [39] and select training parameters for Genetic Algo-
rithm Neural Network (GA-NN) hybrid models [40], [41].
Fuzzy logic (FL) [34], [37] ensembled with other models
is used for better and faster handling of very long time-
series [42]. Convolutional Neural Network (CNN)-Recurrent
Neural Network (RNN) hybrids are often used to better
correlate load patterns with weather conditions [43], [44].
ANNs can be trained from an Artificial Immune System
model mainly for hyper-parameter optimization [45], [46].
Additional fields of research include extreme learning machine
[47], sequence-to-sequence models and specifically encoder-
decoder architectures [48]β[50]. These advanced techniques
can also have various applications in more specific problems
like transmission system loads for special days, such as New
Years' Eve or Easter [37], or even special loads like data center
consumption [40].
C. Contribution
The high-level objective of this paper is STLF at Transmis-
sion System Operator (TSO) level. Specifically, we examine
day-ahead forecasts of 15-minute resolution (96 timesteps-
ahead predictions) for the net load time series of the Por-
tuguese transmission system. Specifically, the purpose of this
paper is to perform an extensive comparison of DL archi-
tectures, namely Neural Basis Expansion Analysis Time Se-
ries Forecasting (N-BEATS) [51], Long Short-Term Memory
Recurrent NNs (LSTM) [52] and Temporal Convolutional
Networks (TCN) [53]. An averaging and a stacking ensemble
of PSF estimators [35] serve as baseline models. Moreover,
we attempt to demonstrate the effects of the COVID-19 global
emergency that initiated in early 2020 on the performance of
the employed models by alternating their training, validation,
and testing periods accordingly. Ultimately, motivated by the
capabilities of the smart grid for integration of ICT tech-
nologies and automation we also propose a high-level model
deployment scheme targeted for production environments and
production systems of network operators.
and special events. An initial step of data transformations
was thus performed leading to additional variables, from now
on referred to as temporal covariates. Temporal covariates
are synthetic variables that encode the timely characteristics
of each time step and can be used as predictors enriching
the input feature space of the forecasting problem. Table I
lists the specific temporal covariates accompanied by their
modelling approach. A very common encoding approach is
through sinusoidal and cosinusoidal transformations as they
can reproduce the continuousness periodicity of time. Both
temporal
transformations need to be included in the final
covariates to avoid getting the same values for different time
moments due to their nonmonotonic nature.
D. Structure of the Article
The rest of the paper is organized as follows. Section II
describes our methodological approach, including the utilized
methods, architectures, and the proposed evaluation and de-
ployment scheme. Section III summarizes the results of the
forecasting models, in terms of accuracy and sustainability,
also discussing the effects of the pandemic on them, followed
by concluding remarks and future work in Section IV.
II. METHODOLOGY
This section presents the followed methodology for address-
ing the common stages of an ML lifecycle. Specifically, the
stages described are (i) data collection, wrangling and transfor-
mations; (ii) exploratory analysis of the dataset; (iii) selection
of ML and DL architectures along with their development
process and model validation; (iv) an evaluation framework
tailored to the requirements of production smart grid envi-
ronment and finally (v) a proposed conceptual framework for
models' deployment to production based on the principles of
MLOps.
A. Data Collection and Feature Extraction
The main part of the dataset consisted of the Portuguese net
energy demand time series at a 15-minute resolution. Such data
are publicly available online. Except for performing a compar-
ative analysis of state-of-the-art ML models in forecasting the
Portuguese load at day-ahead level, the aim of this study is also
to observe the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on model
performance. Therefore, collected net load data from 2009 to
2020 were utilized, as they permit to experiment with different
whole year test sets that either referred (2020) or not (2019) to
time periods related with the global health emergency. Some
common operations that were applied before proceeding to
transformations and feature engineering, are: (i) removal of
duplicate entries (mainly caused by changes between standard
and daylight saving time) and (ii) filling missing data (very
few cases that were handled with linear interpolation).
Autoregressive models can predict future values of a time
series by looking back at its past values. However, as already
discussed, various exogenous variables can affect its patterns,
therefore holding predicting power. Amongst them, we decided
to model the time in an attempt to capture seasonal factors
TABLE I
CHARACTERISTICS OF INTRODUCED TEMPORAL COVARIATES
Time
Feature
Year
Month
Day of Year
Day of Week
Week of Year
Holiday
Periodicity
-
Yearly
Yearly
Weekly
Yearly
Yearly
Encoding
Method
Integer
Sine & Cosine
Sine & Cosine
Sine & Cosine
Sine & Cosine
Boolean
Number of
Derived Covariates
1
2
2
2
2
1
B. Exploratory Data Analysis
Following data wrangling and feature engineering, several
data exploratory analytics and insights were extracted for the
dataset. These analytics mainly contribute to visualize and
understand the basic patterns of the load series along with
the pandemic's effects on the time series profile, motivating
the COVID-19 related analysis. All statistics range from
2017 to 2020, highlighting the distribution shift of the load
time series during the lockdown period, which began on
17th of March 2020 and lasted until the 3rd of May 2020
when a gradual relaxation of measures was applied. Fig. 1
illustrates the alteration of the distribution of load values
within 2020 compared to previous years, denoting a general
load reduction, smoothing and transition to a unimodal rather
than bimodal yearly distribution. Fig. 2 illustrates the total
monthly load values for all years of interest, pinpointing a
harsh and unprecedented decrease during the lockdown which
is highly expected due to the commercial, tourism and food
industries of the country being closed and the corporate ones
shifting to the Work from Home paradigm. Fig. 3 clearly
depicts the alteration of average daily profiles with respect to
mostly their magnitude yet their shape as well. In summary,
all observations imply that any conventional model being
trained on the historical values of the Portuguese load series is
expected to fail to completely adapt to the distributions shift
caused by the pandemic, leading to dips in performance and
increased errors while predicting 2020. This factor subjects to
further investigation within the present study.
C. Model Selection
In this section we present the ML and DL models employed
within our experimentation.
PSF. The Pattern Sequence Forecast algorithm (PSF) in-
troduced by Martinez-Alvarez et al. in [35], is a univariate
time-series forecasting approach based on the similarity be-
tween pattern sequences. It consists in two distinct steps: the
clustering step, in which time-series patterns are grouped, and
the predictive step, which leverages on the cluster models to
generate forecasts. PSF therefore treats training data as a set
of cluster labels, using their sequencing to find and match
windows of similar sequencing and combining them into a
single forecast.
LSTM. Unlike standard feedforward neural networks,
RNNs have feedback connections that render them appro-
priate for processing sequential data. Long short-term mem-
ory (LSTM) is an extension of the conventional RNN that
came to solve the vanishing gradient problem, mitigating
the inability to learn long range dependencies [52]. LSTMs
have been widely used for short-term load forecasting tasks.
A very common approach of employing LSTMs is through
encoder-decoder setups-instead of fully recurrent architec-
tures-especially for sequence-to-sequence tasks, and there-
fore were utilized for the multi-step horizon forecasts of the
present study (96 forecast steps) [48]β[50].
N-BEATS is a neural network that was first described in a
2019 article by Oreshkin et al. in [51]. The authors reported
that N-BEATS outperformed the M4 forecast competition
winner by 3%. The M4 winner was a hybrid between a recur-
rent neural network and Holt-Winters exponential smoothing,
whereas N-BEATS implements a "pure" deep neural architec-
ture. N-BEATS treats forecasting as a non-linear multivariate
regression problem. It comprises a very deep stack of fully
connected non-linear neural regressor blocks interconnected
with doubly residual links. N-BEATS has already been vali-
dated on mid-term energy forecasting tasks [54]. However, our
case study tasks fall within the scope of STLF, hence opening
a new perspective for validating the architecture on this task.
TCN is a CNN that consists of dilated, causal 1-dimensional
convolutional layers with the same input and output lengths
and was first proposed in [53] as a solution for time series
forecasting tasks. The authors reported that a simple convo-
lutional architecture is more effective across diverse sequence
modelling tasks than recurrent architectures such as LSTMs
and GRUs. TCNs have been recently validated for STLF tasks
[55], [56] and are employed throughout our case study.
D. Model Training
The aim of the training process has been the creation of
models for day-ahead forecasting at 15-minute resolution for
the net electricity demand of the Portuguese transmission
system. In this context, the selected ML and DL methods were
trained for multiple combinations of hyperparameters allowing
to select the optimal architecture for each method, as described
in detail in Table II. Additionally to the hyperparameters of
the table, an experimentation on different lookback window
values took place, namely 384 (3 days), 672 (7 days), and
960 (10 days) timesteps. Note that the number of layers of
the TCN architectures are set to "auto" as they are adjusted
Fig. 1. Histogram of the 15-minute load values for the years 2017-2020.
Fig. 2. Average monthly load for the years 2017-2020.
Fig. 3. Average daily load profiles for the years 2017-2020.
at each training round to ensure full receptive field coverage
based on Eq. 11.
n = logb
(cid:18) (l β 1) * (b β 1)
(k β 1)
(cid:19)
+ 1
(1)
where n represents the number of convolutional layers, l the
length of the lookback window, b the dilation base, and k the
kernel size. For the training of the PSF baseline models several
instances were obtained for different pattern window lengths
and underlying clustering algorithms,
including K-Means,
SOM, and Gaussian Mixture Models. Each of the baseline
algorithms was optimized using the Silhouette Index. The final
optimized PSF models were used to create ensemble forecasts,
using both averaging and stacking ensemble techniques, with
SVR as the meta-learning algorithm. Model training took place
on a laptop with an AMD Ryzen 9 4900H CPU, an NVIDIA
RTX2060 6GB GPU, and 24GB RAM.
TABLE II
MODEL FLAVORS ORDERED BY INCREASING COMPLEXITY OF DEEP
LEARNING ARCHITECTURE HYPERPARAMETERS
Base
Model
N-BEATS
Encoder β
Decoder LSTM
TCN
PSF
Architectural Properties per Model Flavor
Property Name
Number of stacks
Number of blocks
Number of layers
Layer widths
Expansion coefficient dim.
Recurrent layers
Hidden dimension
Dropout
Learning rate
Kernel size
Number of filters
Dilation base
Convolutional layers
Ensemble Method
Flavor 0
20
1
4
64
5
1
20
0
0.0008
3
3
2
auto
Averaging
Flavor 1
30
1
4
512
5
2
64
0
0.001
5
5
3
auto
SVR
The dataset split was as follows: (i) training set: 2009-
2017 (ii) validation set: 2018 (iii) test set: 2019. Subsequently,
the best models from the previous step were retrained to
investigate the effect of the COVID-19 load distribution shifts
on model performance. For this purpose, the dataset split was
modified for the test set to include the pandemic period as
follows: (i) training set: 2009-2018 (ii) validation set: 2019 (iii)
test set: 2020. The results of the experiments are summarized
in the section III.
With respect to temporal covariates, the N-BEATS model
them as: (i) indicated in [51], [54];
was trained without
(ii) it was observed that its performance was systematically
lower when the covariates were included in the model. On
the contrary, LSTMs and TCNs are trained and evaluated
including the temporal covariates for the opposite reason.
Temporal covariates are not applicable to the PSF method.
E. Model Validation and Evaluation Framework
Regarding model validation and evaluation,
in our case
every DL model was: (i) trained on the predefined training
1https://unit8.com/resources/temporal-convolutional-networks-and-
forecasting/
set; (ii) validated on the validation set to discover the best
hyperparameters; (iii) and evaluated on the remaining and pre-
viously unseen test set. With respect to performance measures,
various forecast errors are common in forecasting applications
including the Mean Absolute Error (MAE), the Mean Squared
Error (MSE), the Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE),
the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), the Symmetric Mean
Absolute Percentage Error (SMAPE), and the Mean Absolute
Scaled Error (MASE) [57]. We use MAPE (Eq. 2) as a widely
accepted choice for STLF benchmarks.
M AP E =
1
m
m
(cid:88)
i=1
(cid:12)
(cid:12)
(cid:12)
(cid:12)
Yt β Ft
Yt
(cid:12)
(cid:12)
(cid:12)
(cid:12)
* 100(%)
(2)
where m represents the number of samples, Yt and Ft stand for
the actual data values and forecasted data values, respectively.
Regarding the calculation of MAPE-as our experimen-
tation is aimed for smart grid applications and deployment
to production-we opted for a backtesting approach. Back-
testing refers to the periodical updating of a model's history
depending on its forecasting horizon. To elaborate more, let
us suppose a TSO that aims to participate in the Portuguese
daily energy market. Every day, a 96-step-ahead (day-ahead)
forecast is required. However, at the end of the forecasted
day, the ground truth values of the series are already known
and thus can be fed to the model to update its lookback
window for day-ahead inference. Hence, the proposed DL
models are validated and evaluated following this approach,
which is however not applicable to the PSF method.
F. High-Level Deployment Framework
As previously discussed, the proposed deployment frame-
work can be part of a TSO smart grid system that is used for
producing daily load forecasts in an automated manner. At this
deployment stage, it is important that the model's performance
is constantly monitored by being evaluated on newly ingested
data. Dips in performance possibly indicate that the entire
training process may need to be repeated to update the model
to incorporate new trends. Fig. 4 illustrates this concept within
a smart grid application.
III. RESULTS
This section presents the results of our study. Python and
MLflow [10] were used to set up the experimentation pipeline
and keep track of of the performed experiments.
A. Results of the Comparative Analysis
The results of the comparative analysis for the 2009-2019
experimentation period (training set: 2009-2017, validation
set: 2018, test set: 2019) are shown in Table III. They refer
both to model accuracies (MAPE) and GPU training times
as such a measurement can be a good indicator of envi-
ronmental friendliness and sustainability. Specifically, the N-
BEATS architecture clearly outperforms the LSTM and TCN
architectures from both perspectives with Model 4 achieving
the lowest MAPE at a relatively low GPU time. Moreover,
regarding TCN and LSTM it can be concluded that a lookback
TABLE III
MODEL TRAINING AND EVALUATION RESULTS FOR THE 2009-2019
PERIOD
Architecture
Performance
Model
Family
Model
ID
Flavor
l
MAPE
Epochs
PSF
N-BEATS
LSTM
TCN
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
1
1
1
-
-
384
672
960
384
672
960
384
672
960
384
672
960
384
672
960
384
672
960
3.333
3.581
2.245
2.212
2.001
2.305
2.315
2.179
2.437
2.57
2.56
2.212
2.087
2.201
2.525
2.409
2.413
2.293
2.243
2.268
-
-
51
43
71
23
31
37
261
141
149
35
43
41
127
145
117
123
99
89
GPU
Time
(h)
0
0
1.10
1.00
1.49
0.94
1.04
1.18
5.85
3.67
3.85
1.19
1.98
2.15
3.06
3.44
3.04
2.70
2.58
2.39
accuracy decrease proving to be the most robust choice for
the distribution shift observed during the lockdown period.
A potential interpretation of this result can be that the TCN
model exhibited a relative "underfitting" compared to the other
models for the testing period of 2019; and underfitted models
usually tend to estimate less accurately the target distribution,
however they are less affected by potential distribution shifts,
which is the case for 2020.
IV. CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE WORK
Power grids have been undergoing an unprecedented change
during the last few years, integrating RES and new tech-
nologies such Big Data and ML. In this context, STLF
is a multiparametric task of great importance as it allows
for harmonized grid operation and participation of EPES
stakeholders in the energy market. In the meanwhile of this
smart grid evolution, the COVID-19 global health emergency
triggered socioeconomic phenomena that led to distribution
shifts of energy demand, demonstrating the need for rig-
orous forecasting models and out-of-distribution generaliza-
tion. The present work focuses on comparing three state-of-
the-art DL architectures-namely N-BEATS, encoder-decoder
LSTM, and TCN-in terms of accuracy and sustainability, also
examining their robustness during the pandemic period.
During the pre-pandemic period, it has been demonstrated
that N-BEATS outperforms both the other architectures lever-
aging a relatively simple architecture, while also exhibiting
acceptable GPU times and hence sustainability. Nonetheless,
it is significantly affected by the load distribution shifts of
the pandemic leading to decreased accuracy when tested on
2020. The TCN architecture exhibits lower accuracy and
sustainability in general, however it demonstrates better out-
Fig. 4. High-level deployment framework for the STLF pipeline.
window (l) of 7 days (672 15-minute timesteps) is the best
option for higher accuracy. However,
the case
for N-BEATS which performs better for the 10-day lookback
window. Note here that all deep architectures outperform the
PSF baseline model in terms of accuracy at the cost-of
course-of significant GPU utilization.
this is not
As a general comment, larger and more complex neural
network architectures (flavor 1) on average result to fewer
epochs as they can fit
the datasets faster, denoting lower
GPU times and thus higher sustainability. In fact, except
for N-BEATS, deeper architectures lead as well to higher
accuracies, avoiding potential overfitting thanks to the early
stopping approach. Note here that a poor selection of neural
architecture-such as the flavor 0 of the LSTM family-can
lead to low accuracy and increased GPU times and eventually
higher electricity consumption during training.
B. Impact of the Pandemic on the Model Performance
To examine the impact of the COVID-19 global health
emergency on DL models' performance, the most accurate
setups from each DL model family from the experiments of
2009-2019 period (Model 4, 12 and 18) were retrained on
2009-2018 validated on 2019, and tested on 2020. Even though
the training dataset is larger by one year, a condition that is
usually beneficial for the accuracy of DL models, this is not
the case here as most models perform lower on average as
illustrated in Fig. 5. To get a more detailed insight on the
effects of the pandemic, the model errors are listed for each
season separately, revealing the most affected period by the
pandemic. Expectedly, during the spring and summer periods
the MAPE is significantly increased. Of course, the lockdown
period, which can be approximately projected to spring 2020
(also accounting for the post-lockdown measures) is linked
with larger errors, especially for the LSTM and N-BEATS
models. Nonetheless, the TCN model exhibits a much smaller
Fig. 5. Model errors per season for the years 2019 (normal year) and 2020 (COVID-19 global health emergency)
of-distribution generalization during the pandemic, as a poten-
tial result of underfitting the pre-pandemic training set. The
encoder-decoder LSTM proved to be highly sensitive to the
architecture depth and complexity, while it also failed to adapt
to the COVID-19 distribution shift. As a main conclusion, it
is always upon EPES stakeholders and their ML engineers to
decide on their architecture of preference for STLF tasks based
on their computational resources, error tolerance per season,
and readiness for model retraining in case of distribution shifts.
Hence, we would suggest TCN for those that need a "one-for-
all" solution without the constant necessity for monitoring and
retraining. On the contrary, we would suggest N-BEATS for
stakeholders that require state-of-the-art performance and high
sustainability at the cost of an automated monitoring process
as the one proposed in the deployment scheme of Fig. 4.
Future work includes: (i) the integration of weather vari-
ables-and specifically weather forecasts-in the models; (ii)
an exhaustive hyperparameter space search as long as High-
Performance Computers (HPC) become available; (iv) the
extensive search of rigorous setups-including DL ensem-
bles-that will allow for out-of-distribution generalization
without the compromise of underfitting during normal periods;
(v) a thorough study on the tradeoff between accuracy and
GPU times in terms of grid and environmental sustainability.
From a broader perspective, a future step could as well be the
extension of this experimentation to more European countries
alongside the development of a production ICT system for
automated and easily deployable STLF.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
This work has been funded by the European Union's Hori-
zon 2020 research and innovation programme under the I-
NERGY project, Grant Agreement No 101016508.
REFERENCES
[1]
[2]
T. Hong, J. Xie, and J. Black, "Global energy forecasting competition
2017: Hierarchical probabilistic load forecasting," International Journal
of Forecasting, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 1389β1399, Oct. 2019.
European Union Institute for Security Studies, Europe's energy crisis
conundrum, 2022.
[3] C. Fraune and M. Knodt, "Sustainable energy transformations in an age
of populism, post-truth politics, and local resistance," Energy Research
& Social Science, vol. 43, pp. 1β7, Sep. 2018.
[4] C. W. Su, K. Khan, M. Umar, and W. Zhang, "Does renewable energy
redefine geopolitical risks?" Energy Policy, vol. 158, p. 112 566, Nov.
2021.
E. Spiliotis, H. Doukas, V. Assimakopoulos, and F. Petropoulos,
"Forecasting week-ahead hourly electricity prices in Belgium with
statistical and machine learning methods," Mathematical Modelling of
Contemporary Electricity Markets, pp. 59β74, Jan. 2021.
[5]
[6] A. Navon, R. Machlev, D. Carmon, A. E. Onile, J. Belikov, and Y.
Levron, "Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Energy Systems and
Electric Power Grids-A Review of the Challenges Ahead," Energies
2021, Vol. 14, Page 1056, vol. 14, no. 4, p. 1056, Feb. 2021.
[7] D. Obst, J. De Vilmarest, and Y. Goude, "Adaptive Methods for
Short-Term Electricity Load Forecasting during COVID-19 Lockdown
in France," IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 36, no. 5,
pp. 4754β4763, Sep. 2021.
[8] A. M. Tudose, I. I. Picioroaga, D. O. Sidea, C. Bulac, V. A. Boicea,
L. Fortuna, G. Chicco, A. Mazza, S. Musumeci, E. Pons, and A. Russo,
"Short-Term Load Forecasting Using Convolutional Neural Networks
in COVID-19 Context: The Romanian Case Study," Energies 2021,
Vol. 14, Page 4046, vol. 14, no. 13, p. 4046, Jul. 2021.
[9] M. Arjovsky, "Out of Distribution Generalization in Machine Learn-
[10]
ing," Ph.D. dissertation, New York University, 2020.
S. Alla and S. K. Adari, Beginning MLOps with MLFlow. Apress,
2021.
[11] V. Marinakis, H. Doukas, J. Tsapelas, S. Mouzakitis, ΜA. Sicilia, L.
Madrazo, and S. Sgouridis, "From big data to smart energy services:
An application for intelligent energy management," Future Generation
Computer Systems, vol. 110, pp. 572β586, Sep. 2020.
[12] V. Marinakis, "Big Data for Energy Management and Energy-Efficient
Buildings," Energies 2020, Vol. 13, Page 1555, vol. 13, no. 7, p. 1555,
Mar. 2020.
[13] M. A. Hammad, B. Jereb, B. Rosi, and D. Dragan, "Methods and
Models for Electric Load Forecasting: A Comprehensive Review,"
Logistics & Sustainable Transport, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 51β76, Feb.
2020.
S. M. Moghaddas-Tafreshi and M. Farhadi, "A linear regression-
based study for temperature sensitivity analysis of iran electrical load,"
[14]
in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Industrial
Technology, 2008.
[15] B. Yildiz, J. I. Bilbao, and A. B. Sproul, A review and analysis
of regression and machine learning models on commercial building
electricity load forecasting, 2017.
[16] G. Dudek, "Pattern-based local linear regression models for short-term
load forecasting," Electric Power Systems Research, vol. 130, pp. 139β
147, Jan. 2016.
P. V Μah Μakyla, E. Hakonen, and P. L Μeman, "Short-term forecasting
of grid load using Box-Jenkins techniques," International Journal of
Electrical Power & Energy Systems, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 29β34, Jan.
1980.
[17]
[18] W. R. Christiaanse, "Short-term load forecasting using general ex-
ponential smoothing," IEEE Transactions On Power Apparatus and
Systems, no. 2, pp. 900β911, 1971.
[19] A. E. Clements, A. S. Hurn, and Z. Li, "Forecasting day-ahead elec-
tricity load using a multiple equation time series approach," European
Journal of Operational Research, vol. 251, no. 2, pp. 522β530, Jun.
2016.
[20] W. Li and Z. G. Zhang, "Based on time sequence of ARIMA model in
the application of short-term electricity load forecasting," in ICRCCS
2009 - 2009 International Conference on Research Challenges in
Computer Science, 2009, pp. 11β14.
[21] H. Cui and X. Peng, "Short-Term City Electric Load Forecasting with
Considering Temperature Effects: An Improved ARIMAX Model,"
Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2015, 2015.
[22] H. Musbah and M. El-Hawary, "SARIMA Model Forecasting of Short-
Term Electrical Load Data Augmented by Fast Fourier Transform
Seasonality Detection," Tech. Rep.
[24]
[25]
[23] N. Mohan, K. P. Soman, and S. Sachin Kumar, "A data-driven
strategy for short-term electric load forecasting using dynamic mode
decomposition model," Applied Energy, vol. 232, pp. 229β244, Dec.
2018.
S. Annamareddi, S. Gopinathan, and B. Dora, "A simple hybrid
model for short-term load forecasting," Journal of Engineering (United
Kingdom), vol. 2013, 2013.
T. Du, X. Wang, and X. Wang, "A combined model of wavelet
and neural network for short term load forecasting," in PowerCon
2002 - 2002 International Conference on Power System Technology,
Proceedings, vol. 4, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers
Inc., 2002, pp. 2331β2335.
S. Fan, L. Chen, and W. J. Lee, "Short-term load forecasting using
comprehensive combination based on multimeteorological informa-
tion," IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, vol. 45, no. 4,
pp. 1460β1466, 2009.
[26]
[27] D. Baczy Μnski and M. Parol, "Influence of artificial neural network
structure on quality of short-term electric energy consumption fore-
cast," in IEE Proceedings: Generation, Transmission and Distribution,
vol. 151, Mar. 2004, pp. 241β245.
[29]
[28] W. C. Hong, "Electric load forecasting by seasonal recurrent SVR (sup-
port vector regression) with chaotic artificial bee colony algorithm,"
Energy, vol. 36, no. 9, pp. 5568β5578, 2011.
J. X. Che and J. Z. Wang, "Short-term load forecasting using a kernel-
based support vector regression combination model," Applied Energy,
vol. 132, pp. 602β609, Nov. 2014.
S. Fan and L. Chen, "Short-term load forecasting based on an adaptive
hybrid method," IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 21, no. 1,
pp. 392β401, Feb. 2006.
[30]
[31] H. Mori and N. Kosemura, "Optimal regression tree based rule
discovery for short-term load forecasting," in Proceedings of the IEEE
Power Engineering Society Transmission and Distribution Conference,
vol. 2, 2001, pp. 421β426.
[32] G. Dudek, "Short-Term Load Forecasting Using Random Forests," Ad-
vances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 323, pp. 821β828,
2015.
S. Ben Taieb and R. J. Hyndman, "A gradient boosting approach
to the Kaggle load forecasting competition," International Journal of
Forecasting, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 382β394, Apr. 2014.
[33]
[34] H. M. Al-Hamadi and S. A. Soliman, "Fuzzy short-term electric
load forecasting using Kalman filter," IEE Proceedings: Generation,
Transmission and Distribution, vol. 153, no. 2, pp. 217β227, Mar. 2006.
F. Mart ΜΔ±nez- ΜAlvarez, A. Troncoso, J. C. Riquelme, and J. S. Aguilar
Ruiz, "Energy time series forecasting based on pattern sequence
[35]
[36]
similarity," IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering,
vol. 23, no. 8, pp. 1230β1243, 2011.
Z. Deng, B. Wang, Y. Xu, T. Xu, C. Liu, and Z. Zhu, "Multi-scale
convolutional neural network with time-cognition for multi-step short-
term load forecasting," IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 88 058β88 071, 2019.
[37] K. B. Song, Y. S. Baek, D. H. Hong, and G. Jang, "Short-term load
forecasting for the holidays using fuzzy linear regression method,"
IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 96β101, Feb.
2005.
[38] G. C. Liao and T. P. Tsao, "Application of a fuzzy neural network
combined with a chaos genetic algorithm and simulated annealing
to short-term load forecasting," IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary
Computation, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 330β340, Jun. 2006.
L. G. Chen, H. D. Chiang, N. Dong, and R. P. Liu, "Group-based
chaos genetic algorithm and non-linear ensemble of neural networks
for short-term load forecasting," IET Generation, Transmission and
Distribution, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 1440β1447, Apr. 2016.
[39]
[41]
[40] A. Vesa, T. Cioara, I. Anghel, M. Antal, C. Pop, B. I. .-. Sustainability,
and U. 2020, "Energy flexibility prediction for data center engagement
in demand response programs," mdpi.com, vol. 12, no. 4, p. 1417,
2020.
S. Mishra and S. K. Patra, "Short term load forecasting using neural
network trained with genetic algorithm & particle swarm optimization,"
in Proceedings - 1st International Conference on Emerging Trends in
Engineering and Technology, ICETET 2008, 2008, pp. 606β611.
T. Senjyu, P. Mandal, K. Uezato, and T. Funabashi, "Next day load
curve forecasting using hybrid correction method," IEEE Transactions
on Power Systems, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 102β109, Feb. 2005.
[42]
[44]
[43] M. Sajjad, Z. A. Khan, A. Ullah, T. Hussain, W. Ullah, M. Y. Lee, and
S. W. Baik, "A Novel CNN-GRU-Based Hybrid Approach for Short-
Term Residential Load Forecasting," IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 143 759β
143 768, 2020.
S. H. Rafi, N. Al-Masood, S. R. Deeba, and E. Hossain, "A short-term
load forecasting method using integrated CNN and LSTM network,"
IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 32 436β32 448, 2021.
L. Hernandez, C. Baladron, J. Aguiar, B. Carro, A. Sanchez-
Esguevillas, J. Lloret, D. Chinarro, J. Gomez-Sanz, and D. Cook,
"A multi-agent system architecture for smart grid management and
forecasting of energy demand in virtual power plants," IEEE Commu-
nications Magazine, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 106β113, 2013.
[45]
[46] B. Farsi, M. Amayri, N. Bouguila, and U. Eicker, "On short-term load
forecasting using machine learning techniques and a novel parallel
deep LSTM-CNN approach," IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 31 191β31 212,
2021.
[48]
[49]
[50]
[47] R. Zhang, Z. Y. Dong, Y. Xu, K. Meng, and K. P. Wong, "Short-
term load forecasting of Australian national electricity market by
an ensemble model of extreme learning machine," IET Generation,
Transmission and Distribution, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 391β397, 2013.
L. Sehovac and K. Grolinger, "Deep Learning for Load Forecasting:
Sequence to Sequence Recurrent Neural Networks with Attention,"
IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 36 411β36 426, 2020.
F. D. Rueda, J. D. Su Μarez, and A. D. R. Torres, "Short-term load
forecasting using encoder-decoder wavenet: Application to the french
grid," Energies, vol. 14, no. 9, May 2021.
S. Henselmeyer and M. Grzegorzek, "Short-term load forecasting using
an attended sequential encoder-stacked decoder model with online
training," Applied Sciences (Switzerland), vol. 11, no. 11, Jun. 2021.
[51] B. N. Oreshkin, D. Carpov, N. Chapados, and Y. Bengio, N-BEATS:
Neural basis expansion analysis for interpretable time series forecast-
ing, May 2019.
S. Hochreiter and J. Schmidhuber, "Long Short-Term Memory," Neural
Computation, 1997.
S. Bai, J. Z. Kolter, and V. Koltun, An Empirical Evaluation of Generic
Convolutional and Recurrent Networks for Sequence Modeling, Mar.
2018.
[53]
[52]
[54] B. N. Oreshkin, G. Dudek, P. PeΕka, and E. Turkina, "N-BEATS neural
network for mid-term electricity load forecasting," Applied Energy,
vol. 293, p. 116 918, Jul. 2021.
L. Yin and J. Xie, "Multi-temporal-spatial-scale temporal convolution
network for short-term load forecasting of power systems," Applied
Energy, vol. 283, p. 116 328, Feb. 2021.
[55]
[56] X. Tang, H. Chen, W. Xiang, J. Yang, and M. Zou, "Short-Term Load
Forecasting Using Channel and Temporal Attention Based Temporal
Convolutional Network," Electric Power Systems Research, vol. 205,
p. 107 761, Apr. 2022.
[57] R. J. Hyndman and A. B. Koehler, "Another look at measures of
forecast accuracy," International Journal of Forecasting, vol. 22, no. 4,
pp. 679β688, Oct. 2006.
|
http://arxiv.org/abs/2302.13034v1 | 2023-02-25T09:11:57 | 2023-02-25T09:11:57 | Does Noise Affect Housing Prices? A Case Study in the Urban Area of
Thessaloniki | Real estate markets depend on various methods to predict housing prices,
including models that have been trained on datasets of residential or
commercial properties. Most studies endeavor to create more accurate machine
learning models by utilizing data such as basic property characteristics as
well as urban features like distances from amenities and road accessibility.
Even though environmental factors like noise pollution can potentially affect
prices, the research around this topic is limited. One of the reasons is the
lack of data. In this paper, we reconstruct and make publicly available a
general purpose noise pollution dataset based on published studies conducted by
the Hellenic Ministry of Environment and Energy for the city of Thessaloniki,
Greece. Then, we train ensemble machine learning models, like XGBoost, on
property data for different areas of Thessaloniki to investigate the way noise
influences prices through interpretability evaluation techniques. Our study
provides a new noise pollution dataset that not only demonstrates the impact
noise has on housing prices, but also indicates that the influence of noise on
prices significantly varies among different areas of the same city. | [
"Georgios Kamtziridis",
"Dimitris Vrakas",
"Grigorios Tsoumakas"
] | [
{
"@title": null,
"@href": "http://arxiv.org/abs/2302.13034v1",
"@rel": "alternate",
"@type": "text/html"
},
{
"@title": "pdf",
"@href": "http://arxiv.org/pdf/2302.13034v1",
"@rel": "related",
"@type": "application/pdf"
}
] | null | {
"@xmlns:arxiv": "http://arxiv.org/schemas/atom",
"@term": "cs.LG",
"@scheme": "http://arxiv.org/schemas/atom"
} | [
"cs.LG"
] | Kamtziridis et al.
REGULAR ARTICLE
Does Noise Affect Housing Prices? A Case Study
in the Urban Area of Thessaloniki
Georgios Kamtziridis1*, Dimitris Vrakas1 and Grigorios Tsoumakas1
*Correspondence:
georgiok@csd.auth.gr
1Department of Informatics,
Aristotle University of
Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, GR
Full list of author information is
available at the end of the article
3
2
0
2
b
e
F
5
2
]
G
L
.
s
c
[
1
v
4
3
0
3
1
.
2
0
3
2
:
v
i
X
r
a
Abstract
Real estate markets depend on various methods to predict housing prices,
including models that have been trained on datasets of residential or commercial
properties. Most studies endeavor to create more accurate machine learning
models by utilizing data such as basic property characteristics as well as urban
features like distances from amenities and road accessibility. Even though
environmental factors like noise pollution can potentially affect prices, the
research around this topic is limited. One of the reasons is the lack of data. In
this paper, we reconstruct and make publicly available a general purpose noise
pollution dataset based on published studies conducted by the Hellenic Ministry
of Environment and Energy for the city of Thessaloniki, Greece. Then, we train
ensemble machine learning models, like XGBoost, on property data for different
areas of Thessaloniki to investigate the way noise influences prices through
interpretability evaluation techniques. Our study provides a new noise pollution
dataset that not only demonstrates the impact noise has on housing prices, but
also indicates that the influence of noise on prices significantly varies among
different areas of the same city.
Keywords: Housing Prices Prediction; Noise Pollution; Ensemble Models;
Interpretability
Introduction
The real estate market plays an important role in people's lives, from individuals
and families, to small businesses and large corporations. The process of purchas-
ing or renting a property, whether for residential or commercial purposes, mainly
depends on the economic and financial planning of a family or a company. Addition-
ally, it is strongly related to the macroeconomics and the financial stability of much
larger groups of people such as countries. Any sign of inconsistency or fluctuation in
the real estate market can provoke apprehension in the state, trigger an economic
recession or, ultimately, even lead to financial crises through housing bubble bursts.
The potential risks are well known to the concerned parties and more importantly
to governments that monitor the market on a regular basis. Banks have also in-
vested greatly in real estate in order to obtain accurate house pricing estimates for
mortgages and housing loans. These organizations often need to estimate the value
of a given property for auctions or damage control when clients are unable to pay
their debts. Besides states and organizations, property owners and investors should
have the right to access valuable insights about the value of their properties too.
This knowledge can increase the efficiency of managing assets or even help make
profitable property investments.
Kamtziridis et al.
Page 2 of 24
Property estimations are performed by human experts like real estate brokers and
engineers. This estimation process considers properties' features and amenities, as
well as external factors such as bus station density or distances to city centers.
These are combined with other metrics, like the House Price Index [1], which tracks
the changes in property prices, to arrive at a price estimate. During this process,
there is no way of quantifying the accuracy of prediction nor the importance of
each component that was included in the task. Therefore, the absence of confidence
increases the risk of the forthcoming decision, which can end up being financially
harmful.
In the contemporary world, the real estate market is represented mostly through
different web-based services. In each country, there are numerous websites with
vast amounts of properties available for renting or buying. These data have been
utilized in the past for different analyses, ranging from creating models capable of
predicting house prices based on their features to estimating prices over time in order
to understand their seasonality. There has been a lot of research on this topic over
the years, with big real estate datasets containing hundreds of properties being used
to train machine learning models with the ultimate goal of providing meaningful
price estimates. These datasets contain basic property features that are specific to
the building itself, such as location, size, floor level and heating type to name a few.
Moreover, they can incorporate other features related to the surrounding area of
the property, such as road network accessibility and distances from basic points of
interest. All these features contribute to the urban profile of a neighborhood, which
can directly or indirectly affect prices to a great extent. The importance of these
features and their correlation to the price estimates have been validated in previous
research [2, 3, 4, 5].
Environmental factors have not been taken into consideration in the literature
as much as they should have, despite their obvious role when selecting a property.
The two most popular are the air quality index and the noise pollution. The first
indicates the level of cleanliness in the air that influences the overall health of the
population in a given area. The second one is related to the actual noise caused by
road traffic, crowds, aviation and other factors such as the presence of night clubs or
manufacturing establishments. Although these two features play a major role in the
nature of a neighborhood, research on their impact on house prices remains largely
underexplored. To some extent, this is to be expected given the practical challenges
of gathering environmental data, such as expensive measuring and monitoring tools,
specialized software, and on-site orchestration of distributed sensors. Usually, these
studies are conducted by large corporations or state departments that subsequently
hold the data for internal use. Even when the results are made public, the raw data
that were collected and used in the experiments are typically not made available.
The impact of the real estate market on a country, in addition to the innovations
that can emerge through research in the field, highlights the potential profit of
such work. Being able to generate valuable environmental features of an urban area
and, then, use those in the housing price prediction problem can help individuals,
small and medium-sized businesses, all the way to large corporations, banks and
government experts make profitable decisions. Aside from profitability, it can shed
Kamtziridis et al.
Page 3 of 24
light on the various factors that influence prices. Knowing if and how the environ-
ment affects housing prices can assist urban planners to design more functional and
efficient cities.
In the first part of this paper, we extract environmental data, and more specifically
noise pollution, from published scientific studies. We focus on studies performed by
the Hellenic Ministry of Environment and Energy[1] for the urban area of Thessa-
loniki, Greece. The end results were published by the government with heat maps
demonstrating the spatial distribution of noise across the city. However, none of the
core noise measurements were made public, making any future use or contribution
to the field difficult. We have managed to overcome this limitation by meticulously
re-creating the sense of noise into a general-purpose and easy to use dataset.
In the second part of this work, we highlight the importance of noise in predicting
house prices. To verify this, we have used the property database of Openhouse[2],
which is a real estate platform operating in major cities of Greece and, mainly, in
the area of Thessaloniki. Since we need to create accurate models we choose to use
ensemble methods that proved to work well in the research literature. The property
and the noise data are used to create multiple models with distinct configurations,
exploring different aspects of the same problem.
The main contributions of this work are:
1 A new general-purpose sense-of-noise dataset, as well as a new housing price
dataset containing noise information for the area of Thessaloniki[3].
2 An extensive experimental evaluation of the contribution of noise in the prop-
erty price estimation process via ensemble models such as XGBoost [6] and
light gradient boosting [7] models.
Related Work
This section presents relevant research in the field of housing price prediction from
a data perspective. It is important to discuss key relevant work in order to better
understand the current state of the area, as well as to position this paper prop-
erly within the literature. We begin by outlining the basic solutions proposed along
the years on housing price estimates that take basic property features into consid-
eration. Then, we move to more advanced approaches, which incorporate various
environmental information and, eventually, focus on experiments based on noise
pollution.
Baldominos [3] studies the housing price prediction problem in the Salamanca
district of Madrid. With a collection of 2,266 properties from popular online sites
containing the fundamental characteristics, they test the correlation between the
features and the price to find out that size is the most important one. They use
these data to construct various regression models of different specifications, such as
support vector machines, multi-layer perceptrons and ensembles of regression trees,
all trying to predict prices given the features. The final results showcase the supe-
riority of the ensemble trees when compared to others. Imran [8] follows another
approach for the capital of Pakistan, Islamabad. Alongside the basic property char-
acteristics, they gather some features related to the surrounding area of a property.
[1]https://ypen.gov.gr/
[2]https://openhouse.gr
[3]https://github.com/gkamtzir/housing-prices-and-noise-thessaloniki
Kamtziridis et al.
Page 4 of 24
For instance, they attempt to include neighborhood related information through
binary values (yes/no) indicating the existence of core amenities and services like
hospitals, schools and entertainment. Although their experiments encapsulate many
features, the results show that besides the total size, the number of bedrooms and
bathrooms, also, radically influence the price, with support vector machines being
the best performing model.
Truong [5] focuses on the Beijing area by using the "Housing Price in Beijing"
dataset which contains more than 300,000 properties. Each property, apart from
its standard attributes, has various spatial information like distance from the city
center and subway accessibility. The exploratory analysis demonstrates direct corre-
lation between the location and the property price, since each district has a different
price range. Initially, random forest [9], XGBoost and lightweight gradient boost-
ing models were used for training. Then, the authors combine these to build a
stacked generalization model [10] by placing random forest and lightweight gradi-
ent boosting at the first level and XGBoost at the second one. This architecture
outperforms any of the individual ones in terms of accuracy, with a much higher
computational cost. Similarly, Xue [11] accumulates property data and urban de-
tails like bus and metro stations and routes, traffic and road network information
for the city of Xi'an, China. The urban data are preprocessed and new meaningful
indices are introduced. The property features and the new indices are utilized by
ensemble models to highlight the fact that size is, again, the most influential factor
in the matter of predicting prices. Additionally, they illustrate the importance of
the neighborhood of a property, because the next most important group of features
is related to the spatial indices. Along the same lines, Kang [12] engineers relevant
features from more generic urban characteristics like human mobility patterns and
socioeconomic data. They experiment with a gradient boosting ensemble in order to
analyze features' significance, where they come to the conclusion that some spatial
features can play a more decisive role when it comes to predicting prices. For exam-
ple, the prices of properties located near university campuses are mainly affected
by the distance to the campus rather than their total size.
Environmental conditions can, also, act on prices. Chiarazzo [13] gathers property
and air pollution data for the city of Taranto in Italy, which is marked as a high
environmental risk area due to its heavy industry. With feature selection and an
artificial neural network they put to the test the correlation of each feature through
an one-by-one elimination process. Interestingly, they state that sulfur dioxide con-
centration, one of the five major air pollutants, is the most determinant with respect
to price, ranking higher than other characteristics such as floor level and distance
to the city center. Shanghai is another industrialized city, where Zou [14] evaluates
the air pollution phenomenon in connection with property prices to quantify even
more their relation. A total of 27,608 properties in conjunction with air pollutants
are used as training data in a gradient boosting model which it attributes 1.6% in
terms of contribution. Under no circumstance, this percentage can be considered
as minimal, since a reduction of 1 ΞΌg/m3 in nitrogen dioxide increases the price by
roughly 278 Yuan per square meter.
Regarding noise pollution, there is much less research available attempting to cor-
relate house prices to noise levels. In general, noise pollution is measured in decibels,
Kamtziridis et al.
Page 5 of 24
where higher values suggest noisier environments. Blanco [15] uses hedonic models
to analyze the connection between prices and noise levels in three different areas
in the United Kingdom. They suggest that when evaluating properties with similar
amenities the presence or absence of noise affects people's choices. In particular, the
way noise impinges on prices differ depending on the area, where in some there is a
positive correlation and in others a negative one. Brandt [16] investigates the same
hypothesis in the city of Hamburg, Germany by combining multiple sources such
as road, air and rail traffic noise pollution with hedonic models too. They highlight
the non-linear relationship among noise and price by stating that price decreases
significantly lower in areas with low levels of noise, as opposed to high noise level
areas where the decrease is more remarkable. Contrary to Brandt's work, Szczepan-
ska [17] study the noise effect on two rather dissimilar locations, with reference to
noise, in the city of Olsztyn, Poland. They indicate the existence of linear correla-
tion between prices and noise pollution which underlines the notion that location
can influence the noise-price connection in great measure.
Tsao and Lu [18] collect property data from the Ministry of the Interior of Taiwan
for the city of Taoyuan and enhances them with a five year period of noise pollution
data from the international airport of Taoyuan. The authors investigate the way
aviation noise impacts the real estate market of the city, due to heavy air traffic in
lower altitudes, with hedonic models. The models indicate that as the number of
flights increases on top of an area, which translates to more noisy conditions, the
prices of the corresponding properties decrease noticeably. Moreover, they measure
the rate of price decline in certain decibel ranges and conclude that for roughly 65dB
of noise due to air traffic the decrease in price can get to 2,356USD, where for more
polluted areas the decline reaches the amount of 3,622USD. Similarly, Morano [19]
study the area of Bari, Italy in order to link noise pollution to house prices, with a
total of 200 properties and noise information from the Strategic Noise Map of Bari
as well as perceptual views for the quality of an area with regards to noise from
residents. To measure the effect of noise, they employ a variation of a data-driven
technique known as Evolutionary Polynomial Regression, or ERP [20], referred to
as ERP-MOGA [21] which utilize genetic algorithms. The final results outline the
negative correlation between prices and noise levels, where highly polluted areas
lead to cheaper housing.
The methodology of the research literature that experimented with the feature
of noise in the housing price prediction problem is presented in Table 1. Most
of them use the conventional hedonic model to predict prices and investigate the
contribution of noise. However, there are more advanced techniques available to
use in terms of predicting accuracy. Also, there are new practices regarding the
interpretability of the model that are able to investigate even further how noise
affects the real estate market of a city. These two points are the primary differences
of the current work.
Noise Data Reconstruction
As previously stated, noise data are difficult to obtain because they require special-
ized equipment for precise measurements, as well as urban environmental specialists
capable of completing a task of this complexity. These data must include geograph-
ical references in a form of a coordinate system, mapping points or blocks on a
Kamtziridis et al.
Page 6 of 24
Table 1: Prediction methods used in the literature when incorporating noise
Paper
Blanco [15]
Brandt [16]
Tsao and Lu [18]
Morano [19]
Method
Hedonic Price Model
Hedonic Price Model
Hedonic Price Model
ERP-MOGA
map to certain noise values in decibels. As far as we know, there is no such data
openly available for the urban area of Thessaloniki, Greece. However, there are offi-
cial studies of noise pollution for Thessaloniki orchestrated by the Hellenic Ministry
of Environment and Energy[4]. The studies were conducted in 2015 for three major
municipalities of the urban area of Thessaloniki, namely Thessaloniki, Neapoli and
Kalamaria, with specialized equipment capable of measuring ground noise caused
by factors like vehicles and crowds, while additionally calculating aviation noise
produced by airplanes landing to or taking off at the nearby airport. The duration
of the studies were set to 46 consecutive days, capturing noise pollution at least
once every hour or, in cases, every 15 minutes. The final results were illustrated
on a heatmap, where discrete colors represent different noise ranges of 5 decibel
intervals. For each municipality, the noise is segmented into daytime and nighttime
noise and, in both cases, the data accumulate the overall noise by taking into ac-
count both traffic and aviation disturbances. Additionally, for Kalamaria there is a
separate heatmap representing only the aviation noise.
Idea and Approach
The aforementioned studies did not make public the underlying data that were used
to create the provided heatmaps. To overcome this problem, we propose a process for
reconstructing the initial noise data with a small error. It is important to state that
heatmaps used discrete colors mapped to specific small ranges of decibels as shown
in Tables 2a and 2b. This means that each color represents the entire range without
changing its tone. The ultimate goal is to be able to create the exact same maps by
utilizing the reconstructed data. More specifically, the new dataset will contain the
noise, in decibels, of a point given its latitude and longitude coordinates.
Table 2: Mapping of Noise Ranges to Colors
(a) Thessaloniki & Neapoli Ranges
Range
[40, 45) dB
[45, 50) dB
[50, 55) dB
[55, 60) dB
[60, 65) dB
[65, 70) dB
[70, 75) dB
[75, 80) dB
80+ dB
Color (RGB)
[182, 254, 191]
[255, 255, 0]
[254, 196, 71]
[253, 103, 2]
[255, 51, 50]
[152, 0, 51]
[174, 155, 219]
[1, 0, 251]
[1, 1, 65]
(b) Kalamaria Ranges
Range
[35, 40) dB
[40, 45) dB
[45, 50) dB
[50, 55) dB
[55, 60) dB
[60, 65) dB
[65, 70) dB
[70, 75) dB
[75, 80) dB
80+ dB
Color (RGB)
[80, 167, 50]
[14, 113, 49]
[255, 243, 59]
[172, 121, 78]
[255, 94, 55]
[192, 23, 18]
[138, 18, 19]
[144, 14, 102]
[40, 115, 183]
[10, 65, 121]
It is obvious that an approximation of the noise levels can be extracted through
the maps' colors. However, there is no spatial information in order to map each pixel
[4]https://ypen.gov.gr/perivallon/thoryvos-aktinovolies/chartografisi-thoryvou-poleodomikon-sygkrotimaton/
Kamtziridis et al.
Page 7 of 24
to the corresponding place on a geographic map. To resolve this, we use a technique
called Georeferencing [22], which attempts to relate digital representations of maps,
like the ones in the noise studies, to a ground system of geographic coordinates.
Geographic Information System (GIS) software tools are used to perform this task.
In our case, we use an open-source GIS software called QGIS[5], where by selecting
a certain amount of points on the actual map and the corresponding points on the
heatmap, we manage to align the two and, eventually, enhance the heatmap with
spatial characteristics.
The next part of the reconstruction process maps every pixel of the image to
a noise value in decibels based on its color. Even though the provided heatmaps
incorporate only discrete colors with no fading effects, the pixel-by-pixel analysis
introduces resolution restrictions, where many pixels cannot be mapped to a color
due to transitioning effects. These cases are found for the most part at the borders
where one color switches to another, as depicted in Figure 1. To address this problem
we can compute the difference between the color of such pixels and the predefined
color ranges [23]. When this difference is sufficiently small, we can assign noise values
of the corresponding color. If this calculation is done properly, the reconstruction
error will be small and, therefore, the data will be more accurate.
Figure 1: Color transition effects at the border of decibel ranges (60,
65] and (65, 70] in Thessaloniki's original noise heatmaps
One way of proceeding with the calculation is by using the Euclidean distance
of the two RGB values. The RGB format consists of 3 separate values ranging
from 0 to 255 indicating the amount of red, green and blue in a pixel. State-of-the-
art solutions discourage this approach because it does not take into consideration
how different these colors are perceived by the human eye [24]. The transition
effects on an image aim to smooth the leap from one color to another in terms of
human eye perception, which highlights the need of another metric. To overcome
this issue, the International Commission on Illumination (CIE) proposed a new
method, called βEβ, able to handle the perceptual non-uniformities of colors, using
the LAB format to represent colors. Similarly to RGB, the LAB format makes use
of 3 separate numbers to identify colors. The first one is the Lightness, ranging from
[5]https://www.qgis.org/en/site/
Kamtziridis et al.
Page 8 of 24
0 to 100, with value 0 defining black and value 100 defining white. The second is the
"A" component representing greenness to redness scale, ranging from -128 to +127.
Finally, the third is the "B" component which represents blueness to yellowness
following the range of the previous component.
We used the most recent version of the βEβ method, called CIELAB2000. The
color comparison result is a number, where 0 means a complete match and as
the number increases, the difference between the colors increases too. To use this
method, one must carefully select the threshold after which the two colors will
be considered to be non-matching. After running some experiments, we set the
threshold to 20. As a consequence of the discreteness of colors on the heatmaps,
the threshold is not considered to be that crucial in our scenario, because the main
goal is to differentiate between the predefined ranges. Essentially, when the color of
a pixel matches a color range, this pixel is assigned the corresponding noise value.
Since our intention is to correlate housing prices with human perceived noise, we
choose to represent each noise range with its arithmetic mean. So, if a pixel color
matches the color of the 50-55 range, it will receive 52.5 as its noise value. The final
result will be sufficient to describe the noise perception of an area if we take into
account the "3dB rule" in the field of Acoustics. The rule states that during an
increase of 3 decibels, the sound energy is doubled and, thus, it is accepted as the
smallest difference that can be easily heard by most people [25]. For instance, the
average human will rarely notice a transition from 50 to 51 decibels or between 60
and 61.
Process
The reconstruction process consists of two phases. In the first phase, we scan the
image pixel-by-pixel and assign to each pixel the appropriate coordinates, as well as
its color. During the second phase, we calculate the color difference of each pixel with
the predefined color ranges. It is clear that not all pixels are important due to the
transitioning effects we mentioned earlier. For example, in cases where two ranges
of radically different colors are adjacent on the map, the transitioning effect will add
some pixels in between that probably will not match any color range. Additionally,
there are cases where the initial studies could not accurately receive measurements,
like the inside of buildings and at the sea. These pixels are not matched to any of
the available noise ranges and, hence, are dropped to declutter the data. Table 3
gives the structure of the final dataset.
Table 3: Final dataset structure
Type
float
float
int
int
int
float
Range
[-90, 90]
[-180, 180]
[0, 255]
[0, 255]
[0, 255]
[0, 85]
Features
latitude
longitude
red
green
blue
noise
These datasets can be used to create heatmaps that resemble the initial ones.
Even though most parts of the images were removed in the process, the remaining
locations are still great in number. This can be verified by considering the dataset
Kamtziridis et al.
Page 9 of 24
size in terms of number of rows in the second column of Table 4. To plot that many
points on a single map is exceedingly difficult due to memory constraints. At the
same time, the datasets hold spatial information that is way too dense, making
them really hard to work with. The dataset supports an accuracy in latitude and
longitude values to at least 5 decimals which in actual distances translates to 1.1
meters. This level of detail is unnecessary and superfluous for the purposes of this
work. To minimize the density of information to more practical levels, we utilize
tessellation. Through this method, the map is segmented into separate same-sized
squared tiles. We chose to tessellate the map by keeping only the four decimal points
of the coordinates. Thus, the accuracy decreases to a resolution of 10 meters that
is more manageable and adequate for our case. We group the points based on this
rule and aggregate their noise using the arithmetic mean to create a representative
indicator for the noise level of the given tile. This technique alters the shape of the
dataset as shown in the third column of Table 4 and allows us to plot the results
on a map.
Table 4: Dataset shapes
Dataset
Thessaloniki & Neapoli (Day)
Thessaloniki & Neapoli (Night)
Kalamaria (Day)
Kalamaria (Night)
Kalamaria Aviation (Day)
Kalamaria Aviation (Night)
# Rows
3,312,310
3,157,730
21,606,947
20,355,609
21,843,537
21,831,157
# Rows (tessellated)
197,445
189,046
109,245
104,070
110,111
109,736
Reduction
94%
94%
99.4%
99.4%
99.4%
99.4%
Results for Thessaloniki and Neapoli
Figure 2 shows the average daily noise for the areas of Thessaloniki and Neapoli,
ranging from 40dB to almost 85dB, for both the original and the reconstructed
versions. The noisiest parts are the main roads and the intersections that can ac-
commodate large numbers of vehicles. The two most distinguishable examples are
the East and West entrances of the city where the noise can reach a level of 80dB.
Also, it is visible the way that the noise spreads almost equally around these highly
polluted spots, which, in fact, increase the noise pollution of the surrounding area.
Besides the road network, one more part of the city that is apparently noisy is the
port, which is very big in size and greatly active during both daytime and night-
time. Furthermore, the correlation between road size, which leads to high traffic,
and the noise pollution can be validated in urban areas with narrow streets. A very
useful example is the area of "Upper Town" marked in Figure 2, which is one of
the oldest parts of the city where due to the increased elevation and the rough
terrain the roads are extremely narrow. This fact, except the restrictions it imposes
on the number of vehicles that can pass simultaneously, makes access difficult and
not appealing to drivers. This is one reason why it is one of the quietest places in
Thessaloniki. Figure 3 shows the average nightly noise in the same area in which,
although the noisiest and quietest places remain the same, the noise pollution levels
are much lower.
Results for Kalamaria
As in the previous subsection, Figure 5 shows the average daily noise for the area
of Kalamaria. Once again, the noisiest places are the main roads, while the quietest
Kamtziridis et al.
Page 10 of 24
Figure 2: Average Daily Noise in Thessaloniki/Neapoli
(a) Reconstructed
(b) Original
Figure 3: Average Nightly Noise in Thessaloniki/Neapoli
(a) Reconstructed
(b) Original
are those surrounded by low traffic streets. The yellow color indicates regions with
the maximum noise levels such as the core intersections. Contrary to the heatmaps
of the other two municipalities where the noise was almost entirely driven by the
road network, in Kalamaria there are certain zones with little or no road network
that are very noisy. This is caused due to air traffic, since the airline routes pass over
the vicinity in relatively low altitude and the turbines generate noise that can reach
over 100dB [26]. This effect is more recognizable at night (see Figure 6). Despite the
fact that the road network has minimal traffic, some areas are noisier compared to
others. The noise generated by airplanes is shown in Figure 7 and 8. These figures
are zoomed in a bit to improve readability and distinguish the street layout. The
aviation data can be of great interest both in research and in industry, so in this
paper, we provide a separate dataset for the aviation noise.
Kamtziridis et al.
Page 11 of 24
Implementation and Experimentation
Property Data
Investigating the correlation and influence of noise in housing prices requires a real
world housing prices dataset. For the purposes of this paper, we have utilized Open-
house[6]. Openhouse is a real estate platform operating in major cities of Greece. It
contains high quality information for a wide range of properties, considering mul-
tiple aspects of them. Since Openhouse is a data oriented platform, paying critical
attention to their service, they have provided Thessaloniki's properties in order to
experiment with the noise data reconstructed in the previous section. The data refer
to residential properties offered for sale that were listed on the platform in October
2022. Each property has the features mentioned in Table 5.
Table 5: Openhouse Property Features
Feature
Size
NumberOfRooms
Latitude
Longitude
EnergyEfficiencyId
ConstructionDate
SubTypeId
FloorLevelId
BasicHeatingTypeId
DoorFrameTypeId
Type
Float
Int
Float
Float
Categorical
Datetime
Categorical
Categorical
Categorical
Categorical
Missing Values
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
13.75%
0.17%
0.30%
30.71%
31.77%
Imputation
-
-
-
-
-
Mean
Mode
Rounded mean
Mode
Mode
The majority of the features are self-explanatory with the exception of 'Sub-
TypeId' and 'DoorFrameTypeId'. 'SubTypeId' refers to the structural subtype of
the residential property receiving values like 'apartment' and 'studio' among others.
'DoorFrameTypeId' corresponds to the type of door frames a property has, such
as 'synthetics' and 'aluminum' to name a few. We have performed an exploratory
data analysis on the given dataset to locate potential outliers and verify the overall
integrity. Outlier detection was done with the interquartile range (IQR) method.
Using IQR in the 'NumberOfRooms' feature led to an upper limit of 7 rooms, which
decreased the dataset size by no more than 1%. Similarly, in the 'Size' feature, the
upper limit was 300m2, which consequently reduced the size by almost 8%. Addi-
tionally, price outliers were removed too, by forcing a price range between 10,000
and 500,000 euros. Eventually, the filtered set consists of 2,014 properties. The miss-
ing values were filled according to Table 5, where different aggregations were used
depending on the data type. It must be noted that although 'DoorFrameTypeId'
and 'BasicHeatingTypeId' features are missing approximately 30% of their values,
they are considered of significant importance in the housing price prediction process
based on the domain knowledge provided by Openhouse. Therefore, we decided to
fill these too, and check their influence in practice. As far as the encoding of features,
the 'EnergyEfficiencyId' and 'FloorLevelId' were encoded using incremental indices
because they are ordinal categorical features. The other categorical features are
nominal so one-hot and binary encoding [27] were used and compared. The one-hot
encoding achieved better results and, thus, used in the following experiments.
[6]https://openhouse.gr
Kamtziridis et al.
Page 12 of 24
Experiments
To investigate the correlation between housing prices and noise we utilize tree-
based models that perform well in similar cases [5, 12, 14]. In particular, we use
decision trees, random forest, XGBoost and light gradient boosting models. To
verify the impact of noise we employ standard interpretability methods like feature
importance, partial dependence [28, 29] and permutation importance [30] plots.
To shed even more light on interpretability, we employ other advanced techniques
such as local interpretable model-agnostic explanations, or LIME, [31] and Shapley
additive explanations, or SHAP, [32]. The hyperparameter tuning for each model
was accomplished with Bayesian optimization [33], which outperformed grid search,
and 5-fold cross-validation.
The experiments were structured in three different axes. The first one corresponds
to the procedure followed to assign the appropriate noise value to each property of
the dataset. We choose to average the noise within a certain radius around each
property, where the actual radius distance is manually selected. The second one
refers to the main noise characteristics we can use when assigning a noise value to
a property. These characteristics are the following:
β’ One feature for the average day noise and one for the average night noise (I)
β’ One feature which averages both day and night noise (II)
β’ One feature for the average day noise (III)
β’ One feature for the average night noise (IV)
The third and last experimental component is the area where we examine the effect
of noise in pricing. The presence of noise can be translated differently depending on
the urban attributes of each part of a city. Good examples that demonstrate this
behavior are city centers, where the noise levels are usually increased compared to
other places in the same city as a consequence of the high road and pedestrian traffic.
In turn, the traffic is caused by the commercial nature of the center since most of
the provided services and amenities are located there. This, in fact, gives extra value
to the properties of this area which makes them more expensive. However, this is
not the case in other parts of the city. For instance, in the suburbs, where there are
mostly residential properties of families, the absence of noise is generally considered
to be a positive factor that can raise the prices. Taking these into consideration,
we focus on three different areas of Thessaloniki with contrasting urban features:
the city center (A), Triandria, Toumpa and Harilaou areas (B) and Kalamaria area
(C), as they are depicted in Figure 4. Another reason why we chose these areas is
their difference in terms of price-noise correlation. This is illustrated in Figure 9,
where the correlation between price per m2 and noise is plotted for the entire area
of interest as well as each individual area. Even though it is difficult to imply any
kind of correlation when looking at the entire area of Thessaloniki, that is not the
case for areas A and C, where their shapes indicate some sort of correlation. Area
B follows the pattern of Figure 9a and was chosen as a representative subset of the
entire area.
Results
The final results are organized into two different groups based on the noise radius
that was used. These radiuses were set to 100 and 50 meters. For each group all four
Kamtziridis et al.
Page 13 of 24
Figure 4: Areas of Thessaloniki
models were trained on the three areas of Thessaloniki for all four noise character-
istics described in the previous section. Due to the area segmentation, the number
of properties has declined, leading to a concern about the sufficiency of the train-
ing set. To make sure the data were enough to be able to make valid conclusions,
we plotted the learning curves of each model and verified that the curves reach
a plateau. Also, because of the large number of different experimental combina-
tions based on the experimentation axes we mentioned previously, we decided to
omit showcasing every examination of the noise characteristics and keep, only, the
one that performs the best. We should point out that when changing noise radius
there are circumstances where a property can end up without a noise value, espe-
cially when the radius decreases. In such cases, these properties are removed from
the dataset and this is why there seems to be inconsistencies in the results when
switching from one radius to another, even without incorporating the noise data.
Table 6: Results for radius set to 100m
A
C
B
MAE MAPE Noise MAE MAPE Noise MAE MAPE Noise
0.15
28919
0.144
28888
0.158
32572
0.173
31477
0.181
32519
0.182
31759
0.238
35264
0.25
31771
31511
30141
32752
31139
38922
40389
48802
52077
22504
19189
21618
22715
24259
24481
28966
30671
0.223
0.233
0.258
0.258
0.267
0.259
0.277
0.271
0.138
0.128
0.151
0.138
0.165
0.173
0.209
0.225
-
IV
-
IV
-
II
-
III
-
II
-
II
-
II
-
III
-
I
-
II
-
II
-
II
Model
XGBoost
XGBoost β
LGBM
LGBM β
RF
RF β
DT
DT β
β :Indicates the use of noise.
Bold text marks the best score across all models for a given area.
The results of Table 6, where the radius is set to 100 meters, indicate a clear
dominance of the XGBoost model in terms of both mean squared error (MAE) and
mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values. The performance gain in each area
varies as well as the noise characteristics that are used. More precisely, in area A
there is no significant improvement, while in the other two areas noise improves both
scores radically. The LGBM model benefits from noise only in area C. The random
Kamtziridis et al.
Page 14 of 24
Table 7: Results for radius set to 50m
A
C
B
MAE MAPE Noise MAE MAPE Noise MAE MAPE Noise
0.15
28919
0.15
28001
0.158
32572
0.161
30216
0.182
31785
0.183
31380
0.27
35319
0.191
35453
22504
20858
21618
22408
24224
24028
33561
27756
31511
31370
32752
29872
38886
39626
48802
50290
0.223
0.229
0.258
0.241
0.256
0.254
0.279
0.271
0.138
0.132
0.151
0.13
0.165
0.168
0.209
0.209
-
III
-
III
-
IV
-
II
-
I
-
IV
-
I
-
III
-
I
-
III
-
II
-
III
Model
XGBoost
XGBoost β
LGBM
LGBM β
RF
RF β
DT
DT β
forest and decision tree models are unable to make use of noise with the exception of
area A where both are boosted. When the radius is set to 50 meters in Table 7, we
observe the same pattern where the hierarchy between the models remains the same.
The main differences appear to be the LGBM model that achieves finer results than
XGBoost in area C and, also, the decision tree which is crucially improved with the
use of noise in area B. Regarding the best performing models, even though setting
the radius to 50 meters can reduce the MAE in areas A and C, the MAPE does not
change remarkably. Furthermore, decreasing the radius exacerbates the results in
area B, so the radius switch does not necessarily enhance the overall performance
of the model.
To measure the extent by which noise increases model performance and inves-
tigate the correlation between noise and price through interpretability evaluation
methods, for the best performing models of each area, we plot the feature impor-
tance, permutation importance and partial dependence plots together with LIME
and SHAP plots. We must mention that in permutation importance plots the mea-
sure of importance in XGBoost refers to the average gain across all splits a feature
is used in, while in LGBM refers to the number of times a feature is used to split
the data.
Area A
For the center area of Thessaloniki XGBoost is the best performing model, when
radius is set to 50 meters. In this model, both average day and night noise are used
as features in the training. The average day noise is ranked in the feature impor-
tance plot of Figure 10 almost as high as the construction date, while the night
noise is located at a couple of ranks below. In the same plot, the 'SubTypeId 4',
which denotes properties classsified as studios, is marked as the most important fea-
ture. The partial dependence plot in Figure 11a shows that property prices increase
as the noise increases, which confirms the initial claim that city centers evaluate
noise positively, which most probably occurs due to their commerciality. This can
be verified by the LIME weights in Figure 13 where high noise values correspond to
bigger weights. SHAP values in the beeswarm of Figure 12 highlights this relation-
ship too, since the left hand-side is mostly colored with blue (low values), while the
right hand-side with red (high values). At last, in Figure 11b the night noise does
not appear to act on prices at the quieter areas. However, as we progress to noisier
parts, night noise has a negative impact on pricing. This is not strange because
during night time the commerciality factor is not that crucial.
Kamtziridis et al.
Page 15 of 24
Area B
For the Triandria, Toumpa and Harilaou areas the best results are demonstrated,
again, by XGBoost with a noise radius of 100 meters. As in the previous area, this
model utilizes both average day and night noise values. The night noise has similar
importance to features such as the location and the heating type as it is depicted
in Figure 14. In the same figure, the permutation importance plot showcases that
the overall noise affects at some degree the accuracy of the model. Even though, at
first, day and night noise do not seem to influence prices, after a certain threshold
in decibels they do have a negative effect on prices which contradicts the results
of area A. One of the possible reasons why noise does not cause price changes in
the initial decibel ranges is the fact that some parts of area B are close to the city
center and, hence, noise is not directly considered as a bad attribute. Once more
Figures 17 and 16 reinforces the previous findings about the generally negative
correlation between noise and price. It should be noted that area B is the only area
where setting the radius to 100 meters leads to better results when compared to
setting it to 50 meters. This differentiation can be attributed to the fact that area B
is the only one located far from the coastline. Seaside properties are notably more
expensive than the rest, which makes property prices' distribution less uniform.
In such scenarios, using a smaller radius can help the model recognize these non-
uniformities. Due to area's B distance from the sea, this does not occur, making the
selection of a bigger radius a better choice.
Area C
In the Kalamaria area, the LGBM model when trained with a noise radius of 50
meters while taking into consideration only the average day noise achieves the best
scores. The performance gain in terms of MAE is at approximately 2.880 euros and
for MAPE marginally over 2%. In particular, the noise is ranked almost as high
as 'Size' with regard to importance in Figure 18. This area is located far from the
center and as a consequence the noise appears to influence price negatively at most
noise ranges. In Figure 19a, the price declines almost linearly as we move to more
noisy parts of the area, while LIME weights in Figure 19b indicate the preference
of the model to assign higher prices to properties with relatively low surrounding
noise. Once more, the SHAP values of Figure 20 confirm the aforementioned ob-
servations, where high average day noise values cause price drops and low average
noises escalate prices. As far as the noise characteristic used, one plausible reason
why the model chooses to incorporate only the day noise is that contrary to the
previous areas, Kalamaria includes also the aviation noise. As it can be seen by
the corresponding heatmaps, aviation noise during night increases the overall noise
which at some extend narrows the gap between day and night noise. This means that
the two noise features are more correlated and, thus, one of them can potentially
be redundant.
Discussion and Conclusion
The main goal of this paper was to investigate how urban noise impacts residential
property prices in the area of Thessaloniki. Currently, there is no publicly available
spatial data regarding noise for the area of interest. Therefore, the first part of this
Kamtziridis et al.
Page 16 of 24
work attempts to create a general purpose dataset indicating the sense of noise
based on coordinates by taking advantage of official and public studies conducted
by the Hellenic Ministry of Environment and Energy.
This new dataset is combined with the properties of the Openhouse platform
to train tree-based machine learning models in order to verify the importance of
noise in housing price estimates. The assumption that noise might be translated
differently depending on the location of the property led us to focus the experiments
on three separate regions of Thessaloniki with dissimilar characteristics. XGBoost
and LGBM models attain the best results which first of all confirm that noise, as a
matter of fact, influences prices and, secondly, it can affect some locations positively
while others negatively. More specifically, property prices in the city center as well
as locations in its vicinity, do increase as noise increases, which is probably the
aftereffect of the overall commerciality of the area. In contrast, properties located
far from the center are impacted negatively by noise. This makes sense considering
that in decentralized areas, such as suburbs, there are mainly houses of families
where quietness is more appreciated.
Besides the further research that can be conducted around this topic with different
models, different property types and features, the newly reconstructed noise dataset
can be used wherever needed for commercial projects and researches that are, even,
not real estate related, since it is a general purpose sense of noise set.
Kamtziridis et al.
Page 17 of 24
Appendix A: Reconstructed Heatmaps
Figure 5: Average Daily Noise in Kalamaria
Figure 6: Average Nightly Noise in Kalamaria
Figure 7: Average Daily Aviation Noise in Kalamaria
Kamtziridis et al.
Page 18 of 24
Figure 8: Average Nightly Aviation Noise in Kalamaria
Appendix B: Correlation Plots
Figure 9: Correlation Between Price/m2 and Noise for Different Areas
(a) Entire Area of Thessaloniki
(b) Center (A)
(c) Triandria, Toumpa and Harilaou (B)
(d) Kalamaria (C)
Kamtziridis et al.
Page 19 of 24
Appendix C: Result Plots
Figure 10: Feature Importance & Permutation Importance for Area A
Figure 11: Partial Dependence Plots for Area A
(a) Day Noise
(b) Night Noise
Figure 12: SHAP Plot for Area A
Kamtziridis et al.
Page 20 of 24
Figure 13: LIME Plots for Area A
(a) Day Noise
(b) Night Noise
Figure 14: Feature Importance & Permutation Importance for Area B
Figure 15: Partial Dependence Plots for Area B
(a) Day Noise
(b) Night Noise
Kamtziridis et al.
Page 21 of 24
Figure 16: SHAP Plot for Area B
Figure 17: LIME Plots for Area B
(a) Day Noise
(b) Night Noise
Figure 18: Feature Importance & Permutation Importance for area C
Kamtziridis et al.
Page 22 of 24
Figure 19: Partial Dependence and LIME Plots for Area C
(a) Partial Dependence (day noise)
(b) LIME Weights (day noise)
Figure 20: SHAP Plot for Area C
Acknowledgements
The authors thank to Anna-Maria Feneri for her helpful comments.
Abbreviations
DT, Decision Trees; GIS, Geographic Information System; IQR, Interquartile Range; LGBM, Light Gradient
Boosting Models; LIME, Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations; MAPE, Mean Absolute Percentage
Error; MAE, Mean Absolute Error; RF, Random Forest; SHAP, Shapley Additive Explanations; XGBoost, Extreme
Gradient Boosting.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Availability of data and materials
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.
Authors' contributions
Conceptualization: GK, GT; Data collection: GK; Formal analysis: GK, Investigation: GK, Writing original
manuscript: GK, GT, DV. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Author details
1Department of Informatics, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, GR. 2Department of Informatics,
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, GR.
Kamtziridis et al.
Page 23 of 24
References
1. Truong, Q., Nguyen, M., Dang, H., Mei, B.: Housing price prediction via improved machine learning
techniques. Procedia Computer Science 174, 433β442 (2020). doi:10.1016/j.procs.2020.06.111. 2019
International Conference on Identification, Information and Knowledge in the Internet of Things
2. Nadai, M.D., Lepri, B.: The economic value of neighborhoods: Predicting real estate prices from the urban
environment. 2018 IEEE 5th International Conference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics (DSAA),
323β330 (2018)
3. Baldominos, A., Blanco, I., Moreno, A., Iturrarte, R., Bern Μardez, ΜO., Afonso, C.: Identifying real estate
opportunities using machine learning. Applied Sciences 8(11), 2321 (2018). doi:10.3390/app8112321
4. Park, B., Bae, J.K.: Using machine learning algorithms for housing price prediction: The case of fairfax county,
virginia housing data. Expert Systems with Applications 42(6), 2928β2934 (2015).
doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2014.11.040
5. Truong, Q., Nguyen, M., Dang, H., Mei, B.: Housing price prediction via improved machine learning
techniques. Procedia Computer Science 174, 433β442 (2020). doi:10.1016/j.procs.2020.06.111. 2019
International Conference on Identification, Information and Knowledge in the Internet of Things
6. Chen, T., Guestrin, C.: XGBoost. In: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on
Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. ACM, ??? (2016). doi:10.1145/2939672.2939785.
https://doi.org/10.1145%2F2939672.2939785
7. Ke, G., Meng, Q., Finley, T., Wang, T., Chen, W., Ma, W., Ye, Q., Liu, T.-Y.: Lightgbm: A highly efficient
gradient boosting decision tree. In: Guyon, I., Luxburg, U.V., Bengio, S., Wallach, H., Fergus, R.,
Vishwanathan, S., Garnett, R. (eds.) Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 30. Curran
Associates, Inc., ??? (2017).
https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2017/file/6449f44a102fde848669bdd9eb6b76fa-Paper.pdf
Imran, Zaman, U., Waqar, M., Zaman, A.: Using machine learning algorithms for housing price prediction: The
case of islamabad housing data. Fundamenta Informaticae 1, 11β23 (2021). doi:10.22995/scmi.2021.1.1.03
8.
9. Breiman, L.: Random forests. Mach. Learn. 45(1), 5β32 (2001). doi:10.1023/A:1010933404324
10. Wolpert, D.H.: Stacked generalization. Neural Networks 5(2), 241β259 (1992).
doi:10.1016/S0893-6080(05)80023-1
11. Xue, C., Ju, Y., Li, S., Zhou, Q., Liu, Q.: Research on accurate house price analysis by using gis technology and
transport accessibility: A case study of xi'an, china. Symmetry 12(8) (2020). doi:10.3390/sym12081329
12. Kang, Y., Zhang, F., Peng, W., Gao, S., Rao, J., Duarte, F., Ratti, C.: Understanding house price appreciation
using multi-source big geo-data and machine learning. Land Use Policy 111, 104919 (2021).
doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104919
13. Chiarazzo, V., Caggiani, L., Marinelli, M., Ottomanelli, M.: A neural network based model for real estate price
estimation considering environmental quality of property location. Transportation Research Procedia 3,
810β817 (2014). doi:10.1016/j.trpro.2014.10.067. 17th Meeting of the EURO Working Group on
Transportation, EWGT2014, 2-4 July 2014, Sevilla, Spain
14. Zou, G., Lai, Z., Li, Y., Liu, X., Li, W.: Exploring the nonlinear impact of air pollution on housing prices: A
machine learning approach. Economics of Transportation 31, 100272 (2022). doi:10.1016/j.ecotra.2022.100272
15. Blanco, J.C., Flindell, I.: Property prices in urban areas affected by road traffic noise. Applied Acoustics 72(4),
133β141 (2011). doi:10.1016/j.apacoust.2010.11.004
16. Brandt, S., Maennig, W.: Road noise exposure and residential property prices: Evidence from hamburg.
Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 16(1), 23β30 (2011).
doi:10.1016/j.trd.2010.07.008
17. Szczepa Μnska, A., Senetra, A., Wasilewicz-Pszcz Μo(cid:32)lkowska, M.: The effect of road traffic noise on the prices of
residential property β a case study of the polish city of olsztyn. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and
Environment 36, 167β177 (2015). doi:10.1016/j.trd.2015.02.011
18. Tsao, H.-C., Lu, C.-J.: Assessing the impact of aviation noise on housing prices using new estimated noise
value: The case of taiwan taoyuan international airport. Sustainability 14(3) (2022). doi:10.3390/su14031713
19. Morano, P., Tajani, F., Di Liddo, F., Dar`o, M.: Economic evaluation of the indoor environmental quality of
buildings: The noise pollution effects on housing prices in the city of bari (italy). Buildings 11(5) (2021).
doi:10.3390/buildings11050213
20. Bruno, D.E., Barca, E., Goncalves, R.M., de Araujo Queiroz, H.A., Berardi, L., Passarella, G.: Linear and
evolutionary polynomial regression models to forecast coastal dynamics: Comparison and reliability assessment.
Geomorphology 300, 128β140 (2018). doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2017.10.012
21. Giustolisi, O., Savic, D.: Advances in data-driven analyses and modelling using epr-moga. JOURNAL OF
HYDROINFORMATICS 11, 225β236 (2009). doi:10.2166/hydro.2009.017
22. Yao, X.A.: Georeferencing and geocoding. In: Kobayashi, A. (ed.) International Encyclopedia of Human
Geography (Second Edition), Second edition edn., pp. 111β117. Elsevier, Oxford (2020).
doi:10.1016/B978-0-08-102295-5.10548-7.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780081022955105487
23. Sharma, G., Wu, W., Dalal, E.N.: The ciede2000 color-difference formula: Implementation notes,
supplementary test data, and mathematical observations. Color Research and Application 30, 21β30 (2005)
24. Mokrzycki, W., Tatol, M.: Perceptual difference in l * a * b * color space as the base for object colour
identification. (2009). doi:10.13140/2.1.1160.2241
25. Long, M.: 3 - human perception and reaction to sound. In: Long, M. (ed.) Architectural Acoustics (Second
Edition), Second edition edn., pp. 81β127. Academic Press, Boston (2014).
doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-398258-2.00003-9.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780123982582000039
26. Konopka, W., Pawlaczyk-(cid:32)Luszczy Μnska, M., ΜSliwi Μnska-Kowalska, M.: The influence of jet engine noise on hearing
of technical staff. Med Pr 65, 583β92 (2014). doi:10.13075/mp.5893.00045
Kamtziridis et al.
Page 24 of 24
27. Potdar, K., Pardawala, T.S., Pai, C.D.: A comparative study of categorical variable encoding techniques for
neural network classifiers. International journal of computer applications 175(4), 7β9 (2017)
28. Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., Friedman, J.: The Elements of Statistical Learning. Springer Series in Statistics.
Springer, New York, NY, USA (2001)
29. Greenwell, B.M., Boehmke, B.C., McCarthy, A.J.: A Simple and Effective Model-Based Variable Importance
Measure. arXiv (2018). doi:10.48550/ARXIV.1805.04755. https://arxiv.org/abs/1805.04755
30. Altmann, A., Tolosi, L., Sander, O., Lengauer, T.: Permutation importance: A corrected feature importance
measure. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 26, 1340β7 (2010). doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btq134
31. Ribeiro, M.T., Singh, S., Guestrin, C.: "Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifier.
arXiv (2016). doi:10.48550/ARXIV.1602.04938. https://arxiv.org/abs/1602.04938
32. Lundberg, S., Lee, S.-I.: A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions. arXiv (2017).
doi:10.48550/ARXIV.1705.07874. https://arxiv.org/abs/1705.07874
33. Snoek, J., Larochelle, H., Adams, R.P.: Practical Bayesian Optimization of Machine Learning Algorithms. arXiv
(2012). doi:10.48550/ARXIV.1206.2944. https://arxiv.org/abs/1206.2944
|
|
http://arxiv.org/abs/2302.13029v1 | 2023-02-25T09:03:05 | 2023-02-25T09:03:05 | MASS: Mobility-Aware Sensor Scheduling of Cooperative Perception for
Connected Automated Driving | Timely and reliable environment perception is fundamental to safe and
efficient automated driving. However, the perception of standalone intelligence
inevitably suffers from occlusions. A new paradigm, Cooperative Perception
(CP), comes to the rescue by sharing sensor data from another perspective,
i.e., from a cooperative vehicle (CoV). Due to the limited communication
bandwidth, it is essential to schedule the most beneficial CoV, considering
both the viewpoints and communication quality. Existing methods rely on the
exchange of meta-information, such as visibility maps, to predict the
perception gains from nearby vehicles, which induces extra communication and
processing overhead. In this paper, we propose a new approach, learning while
scheduling, for distributed scheduling of CP. The solution enables CoVs to
predict the perception gains using past observations, leveraging the temporal
continuity of perception gains. Specifically, we design a mobility-aware sensor
scheduling (MASS) algorithm based on the restless multi-armed bandit (RMAB)
theory to maximize the expected average perception gain. An upper bound on the
expected average learning regret is proved, which matches the lower bound of
any online algorithm up to a logarithmic factor. Extensive simulations are
carried out on realistic traffic traces. The results show that the proposed
MASS algorithm achieves the best average perception gain and improves recall by
up to 4.2 percentage points compared to other learning-based algorithms.
Finally, a case study on a trace of LiDAR frames qualitatively demonstrates the
superiority of adaptive exploration, the key element of the MASS algorithm. | [
"Yukuan Jia",
"Ruiqing Mao",
"Yuxuan Sun",
"Sheng Zhou",
"Zhisheng Niu"
] | [
{
"@title": null,
"@href": "http://arxiv.org/abs/2302.13029v1",
"@rel": "alternate",
"@type": "text/html"
},
{
"@title": "pdf",
"@href": "http://arxiv.org/pdf/2302.13029v1",
"@rel": "related",
"@type": "application/pdf"
}
] | null | {
"@xmlns:arxiv": "http://arxiv.org/schemas/atom",
"@term": "cs.RO",
"@scheme": "http://arxiv.org/schemas/atom"
} | [
"cs.RO",
"cs.LG",
"cs.NI"
] | 1
MASS: Mobility-Aware Sensor Scheduling of
Cooperative Perception for Connected
Automated Driving
Yukuan Jia, Ruiqing Mao, Yuxuan Sun, Member, IEEE, Sheng Zhou, Member, IEEE,
and Zhisheng Niu, Fellow, IEEE
3
2
0
2
b
e
F
5
2
]
O
R
.
s
c
[
1
v
9
2
0
3
1
.
2
0
3
2
:
v
i
X
r
a
Abstract-Timely and reliable environment perception is fun-
damental to safe and efficient automated driving. However,
the perception of standalone intelligence inevitably suffers from
occlusions. A new paradigm, Cooperative Perception (CP), comes
to the rescue by sharing sensor data from another perspective,
i.e., from a cooperative vehicle (CoV). Due to the limited commu-
nication bandwidth, it is essential to schedule the most beneficial
CoV, considering both the viewpoints and communication quality.
Existing methods rely on the exchange of meta-information,
such as visibility maps, to predict the perception gains from
nearby vehicles, which induces extra communication and pro-
cessing overhead. In this paper, we propose a new approach,
learning while scheduling, for distributed scheduling of CP. The
solution enables CoVs to predict the perception gains using past
observations, leveraging the temporal continuity of perception
gains. Specifically, we design a mobility-aware sensor scheduling
(MASS) algorithm based on the restless multi-armed bandit
(RMAB) theory to maximize the expected average perception
gain. An upper bound on the expected average learning regret is
proved, which matches the lower bound of any online algorithm
up to a logarithmic factor. Extensive simulations are carried out
on realistic traffic traces. The results show that the proposed
MASS algorithm achieves the best average perception gain and
improves recall by up to 4.2 percentage points compared to
other learning-based algorithms. Finally, a case study on a trace
of LiDAR frames qualitatively demonstrates the superiority of
adaptive exploration, the key element of the MASS algorithm.
Index Terms-Cooperative perception, mobility-aware, sensor
scheduling, restless multi-armed bandit.
I. INTRODUCTION
Automated driving (AD) has received fast-growing atten-
tions in recent years. Among the enabling technologies of AD,
reliable and timely perception is the basis for safety and energy
efficiency. Much effort has been made to improve the object
detector, using state-of-the-art neural networks and multi-
modality sensors [2]β[5]. However, the standalone perception
has an intrinsic flaw because it can only provide line-of-sight
(LoS) information with onboard sensors, and thus the traffic
participants occluded in the blind zone cannot be detected.
Thanks to the Vehicle-to-Everything (V2X) communication
technology [6], vehicles can communicate with each other and
Yukuan Jia, Ruiqing Mao, Sheng Zhou, and Zhisheng Niu are with Beijing
National Research Center for Information Science and Technology, Depart-
ment of Electronic Engineering, Tsinghua University, China. Emails: {jyk20,
mrq20}@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn, {sheng.zhou, niuzhs}@tsinghua.edu.cn.
Yuxuan Sun is with School of Electronic and Information Engineering,
Beijing Jiaotong University, China. Email: yxsun@bjtu.edu.cn
Part of this work has been published in IEEE ICC 2022 [1].
a wide range of V2X applications are made possible, including
cooperative perception (CP). By exchanging sensor data with
other cooperative vehicles (CoVs), the occluded objects can be
detected, and the perception quality is essentially improved.
There are three levels of CP, namely raw-level, feature-level,
and object-level, differentiated by the type of the shared sensor
data. In its primitive form, object-level CP, only the list of
detected objects is broadcast to other CoVs. The messages
are relatively lightweight, but the loss of details in sensor
data causes difficulties in merging noisy, discrepant results
from multiple sources [7]. In the raw-level CP [8], [9], raw
sensor data such as LiDAR point clouds and images are
transmitted to other CoVs, which preserves complete context
information. However, the data volume to be transmitted in
the raw-level CP is extremely high. Feature-level CP [10],
[11] strikes a balance between the above two in terms of the
communication load, via extracting key features using neural
networks. As reported in Refs. [8], [12], there are hard objects
unrecognizable from any viewpoint alone but can be identified
only when the raw data are aggregated. This implies the
significance of context information and calls for an advanced
CP system framework where more comprehensive sensor data,
in raw-level or feature-level, are shared among CoVs.
Current research on CP has been focusing on designing
novel fusion architectures [11], [13], with limited attention
paid to practical challenges such as the scarce V2X com-
munication bandwidth and the high mobility of vehicles. For
Cellular-V2X technology, the allocated bandwidth is 20MHz
in China and 30MHz in US [14]. However, the real-time
streaming of high-definition video or LiDAR point clouds
takes several megabytes per second for one single link, which
is not scalable subject to the total bandwidth constraint. It is
hardly feasible for the V2X network to support raw-level or
feature-level sensor data broadcast by all CoVs. Therefore, the
scheduling of sensors in unicast CP, i.e., whom to cooperate
with, is a challenging and important problem yet to solve.
High mobility is another under-addressed issue in the litera-
ture of CP. When multiple CoVs are available, it is challenging
to accurately determine the perception gain of a viewpoint
due to unclear occlusion relationships, heterogeneous sensor
qualities, as well as the black-box nature of neural networks.
The movements of CoV also lead to a dynamic candidate CoV
set over time-varying network topologies. Many architectures
rely on extra metadata messages to gather clues about the
perception gain of additional sensors. For example, the future
trajectories [9] or confidence maps [13] are exchanged for
spatial reasoning and perception gain prediction. However,
the sensor viewpoints and wireless channels are time-varying,
making the prediction stale very quickly.
These challenges motivate our solution,
learning while
scheduling, in the framework of online learning. Specifically,
we harness the mobility and make scheduling decisions based
on the historical perception gains from other CoVs' sensor
data, with notably less scheduling overhead compared to
existing methods. This leads to a Multi-Armed Bandit (MAB)
typed problem, which requires exploring to learn about the
environment and simultaneously exploiting the empirically op-
timal action. Its basic form, with stationary reward distribution,
is well solved by the Upper Confidence Bound (UCB) algo-
rithm with performance guarantee [15]. The UCB algorithm
has been applied in a wide range of areas, including edge
computing [16] and mobility management [17] in wireless
networks. Our problem, on the other hand, falls within the
domain of Restless Multi-Armed Bandit (RMAB) [18], where
the rewards are constantly evolving due to mobility.
To deal with the RMAB problem, discounted UCB and
sliding-window UCB [19] are adapted from the classic
UCB algorithm by introducing forgetting mechanisms. An
activation-based policy is proposed for Brownian restless
bandit [20], which leverages statistical assumptions of re-
wards. Moreover, the Exp3 [21] algorithm combats adversarial
rewards that can change arbitrarily. However, none of the
existing methods is engaged with an ever-changing set of CoV
candidates, as is the case when CoVs have different destina-
tions. Our main contributions are summarized as follows:
1) We propose a learning while scheduling framework based
on the RMAB theory for the distributed scheduling of
decentralized CP. Our framework enjoys the advantage of
negligible communication and processing overhead, com-
pared to existing solutions that require frequent exchange
of meta-information.
2) A novel mobility-aware sensor scheduling (MASS) algo-
rithm is proposed to leverage the dynamics in perception
gains due to vehicular mobility. It is also proved that
MASS effectively balances exploration and exploitation
with a dynamic set of CoV candidates, where the learning
regret matches the lower bound of any online algorithm
up to a logarithmic factor.
3) Extensive simulations along with supporting empirical
studies are carried out, showing that the proposed MASS
algorithm outperforms other online scheduling policies. A
case study on a trace of LiDAR frames is also provided to
qualitatively illustrate the benefit of adaptive exploration,
which serves as the key element of MASS.
2
II. RELATED WORK
A. Dataflow of CP
There is a wide range of CP systems designed with different
architectures. In this subsection, we divide them into three
categories based on the dataflow of sensor data, namely
broadcast, centralized, and decentralized.
Broadcast. It is most straightforward to share one's sensor
data by broadcasting to its neighbor CoVs. The broadcast of
object-level data has been standardized as collective perception
message (CPM) [22] by ETSI, but suffers from poor scalability
due to severe wireless interference and processing burden in
the current C-V2X network [23]. Other new designs require
the broadcast of bird eye's view (BEV) features, and the
method of data fusion from multiple sources has been a
research focus. For example, DiscoNet [24] is a teacher-
student framework to learn the pose-aware, attention-based
merging via knowledge distillation, where raw-level CP guides
the feature-level CP. A vision transformer-based architecture is
proposed to capture the inter-agent relationships in V2X-ViT
[25]. V2VNet [11] leverages graph neural networks (GNN) to
achieve a multi-round aggregation of compressed feature data
among nearby CoVs. However, the volume of feature data still
poses a major challenge for the V2X network, particularly
subject to the limited data rate of broadcast transmission.
the RSU can broadcast
Centralized. Road side units (RSUs) are deployed in the
intelligent transportation system to provide a holistic, supe-
rior viewpoint from above, especially at urban intersections.
Therefore,
its detection results to
nearby CoVs. Following this idea, VIPS [26] specializes in
object fusion based on efficient matching of graph structures,
handling the time asynchrony and localization error. On the
other hand, the RSU can also serve as a fusion center to
aggregate CPMs from nearby CoVs and broadcast the merged
results [27]. Moreover, compressed raw point clouds and
features can also be transmitted to the edge server to perform
data fusion and detection, as in EMP [28] and VINet [29].
Although RSU is very effective in assisting perception, the
deployment is costly and it is impossible to cover everywhere.
Decentralized. Without a fusion center, the sensor data
are exchanged in a decentralized, on-demand, and unicast
manner among CoVs, which is more bandwidth-efficient than
broadcast. Decentralized CP can be realized in two different
ways. In one way, a global scheduler determines the communi-
cation topology among CoVs based on the estimated rewards
provided by the CoVs [9]. The transmission decision could
also be determined independently by the CoVs themselves
with locally available information [13]. In the following sub-
section, we review some recent works on the scheduling of
decentralized CP.
The rest of this paper proceeds as follows. We first brief
on the related works in Section II. Then the system model
and problem formulation are introduced in Section III. In
Section IV, the MASS algorithm is proposed, followed by the
performance analysis conducted in Section V. The experiment
results are presented in Section VI, and the paper is concluded
in Section VII.
B. Scheduling of Decentralized CP
Under network bandwidth constraints, the sensor scheduling
problem of CP arises naturally. AutoCast [9] predicts the vis-
ibility and relevance of detected objects to other CoVs, using
meta-information including their future trajectories. Then a
global scheduler allocates the communication bandwidth using
a greedy max-weight scheduler. Ref. [30] uses reinforcement
learning techniques to address the CoV association problem
by RSU, based on the CoVs' interest in locations. Similar to
the centralized architecture, these methods also rely on RSU
to coordinate the transmissions. Besides, Ref. [31] groups ve-
hicles into a cooperative platoon, incorporates task offloading
into CP, and solves the joint optimization problem. Recently,
the paradigm of multi-agent collaboration has been applied.
For example, When2com [32] applies a three-stage handshake
mechanism between any two CoVs to decide whether the
cooperation is necessary. Request maps are exchanged in
Where2com [13], which then utilizes spatial confidence to
determine the communication graph.
To summarize, the scheduling of decentralized CP depends
on spatial reasoning or attention mechanism, both of which
require extra communication and computation. In fact, timeli-
ness is one of the most crucial factor for environmental per-
ception in automated vehicles. Excessive cooperation results
in network latency, leading to severe performance drop due to
positional drifts [33]. In our previous work [1], an algorithm
is proposed to gradually learn the perception gain under the
quasi-stationary assumption, which enjoys negligible schedul-
ing overhead. While preserving the real-time advantage, this
paper deals with the dynamics of the perception gains due to
vehicular mobility, which is more practical.
III. SYSTEM MODEL AND PROBLEM FORMULATION
A. System Overview
We consider a connected automated driving scenario where
a number of CoVs are connected via the V2V network. For
safe and efficient self-driving, perception with timeliness and
high reliability is crucial to vehicles. In this system, CP is
supplementary to the standalone perception. As the basis,
standalone perception is carried out with only onboard sensors
and performs object detection at a high frequency to ensure
timeliness. On the other hand, CP merges the sensor data from
multiple sources with the local data to deal with blind areas
and long-tail cases. A CoV can simultaneously request sensor
data from others and transmit its sensor data to others on
demand.
Typically, the CoVs periodically broadcasts short beacon
messages such as Cooperative Awareness Messages (CAMs)
[34] that include vehicle states and other optional information.
To enable CP, a bit indicating sensor sharing functionality and
a list of indicators for available data formats are added to the
beacon message, thereby other CoVs can request sensor data in
a compatible data format. The sensor data formats can be raw
images, raw point clouds, or intermediate features extracted by
neural networks. To save the communication bandwidth, we
assume that the CoVs can receive sensor data from only one of
the peers at a time. Based on the received beacons, each CoV
sends a sensor request to one of the other CoVs for additional
sensor data to augment its perception. Furthermore, the amount
of communicated sensor data is subject to the available data
rate of wireless links.
In this work, we investigate the distributed sensor schedul-
ing problem in CP, where each CoV independently schedules
another CoV to transmit its sensor data, without the latency
3
Fig. 1.
Illustration of the sensor scheduling procedure in CP.
induced by coordination. Therefore, we focus on one particular
CoV and refer to it as the ego vehicle below. As illustrated in
Fig. 1, the ego vehicle (CoV 0) is driving on the street and
aims to detect the surrounding objects using a CP framework.
It receives beacon messages from three other CoVs, i.e., CoV
1 to 3, that can offer sensor data from different views and
identify them as candidates. The ego vehicle then decides to
schedule CoV 2 because it has a richer supplementary view
and a LoS communication link. Finally, the transmitted sensor
data are merged with the onboard sensor data and fed into
the detector. The optimality of sensor sharer is determined
by many factors, such as occlusion relationships, wireless
link states, sensor qualities and configurations. Therefore, it
is challenging to optimize scheduling decisions.
B. Procedure of CP
We consider a discrete-time system, with the length of a
time slot βt equal to the period of CP.
Candidate Discovery: At the beginning of time slot t,
the ego vehicle identifies the nearby CoVs that can offer
compatible formats of sensor data based on received beacon
messages. The ego vehicle then determines the set of candidate
sharers Vt by filtering the CoVs outside a specific range
to restrict the total number of candidates under Vmax. The
total bandwidth of V2X communications is denoted by W .
Depending on the network status and the use of other V2X
applications, the ratio of available communication resources
Ξ·i(t) is typically time-varying and different across CoVs.
According to Shannon's formula, the data transmission rate
from CoV i to the ego vehicle at time slot t is expressed as
ri(t) = W Ξ·i(t) log2
1 +
(cid:18)
(cid:19)
,
P hi(t)
Ο2
n
(1)
where P is the transmit power, hi(t) denotes the channel gain
between CoV i and the ego vehicle, and Ο2
n is the noise power.
Standalone Perception: At time slot t, the set of interested
objects in the proximity of the ego vehicle is denoted by Ot.
With onboard sensors, the ego vehicle captures a frame of
data X (t)
0 , which can be a raw image or a frame of LiDAR
point clouds. The part of the data that relate to object j β Ot
is denoted by X (t)
0 . Then the sensor data are fed
into an object detector to obtain the detection results, i.e.,
Ξ¦
0,j contains enough information
β {0, 1}. If X (t)
0,j β X (t)
X (t)
0,j
(cid:16)
(cid:17)
CoV 21Beacon1Beacon2RequestEgoVehicle(CoV0)CoV 1CoV 33Transmission1Beacon of object j for accurate classification and localization, the
= 1,
detector can correctly detect the object j, i.e., Ξ¦
(cid:16)
(cid:17)
X (t)
0,j
(cid:17)
(cid:16)
X (t)
0,j
= 0. Particularly, if an interested object
(cid:16)
(cid:17)
X (t)
otherwise Ξ¦
0,j
j is completely occluded, then X (t)
0,j = β
and Ξ¦
= 0.
Cooperative Perception: With CP, the ego vehicle sched-
ules a candidate CoV i β Vt and requests for its sensor
data that could be raw sensor data or features extracted from
neural networks. This additional sensor data can contain finer
textures of objects, provide a better perspective or even reveal
invisible objects from the ego view. Assume the CoVs are
well-synchronized with perfect pose information, then it is
very likely that the shared data could help identify missed
detections. To guarantee the timeliness of perception results,
the scheduled CoV has to compress the sensor data subject
to the transmission rate, otherwise the high latency would
compromise the benefit of CP. For example, the raw sensor
data are uniformly down-sampled to a lower resolution, while
fewer channels of the feature data are transmitted. More
efficient compression algorithms are beyond the scope of this
paper. Before transmission, the original sensor data X (t)
are
compressed to ΜX (t)
i
i
, satisfying
(cid:16) ΜX (t)
D
(cid:17)
i
β€ ri(t)βt,
(2)
where D (*) denotes the data size in bits. Finally, the detection
0,j βͺ ΜX (t)
X (t)
β {0, 1} for CP with
result of object j is Ξ¦
CoV i, where ΜX (t)
that relate to object j.
i,j denotes the part of compressed sensor data
(cid:16)
(cid:17)
i,j
unknown to the ego vehicle. Nevertheless, the perception gain
from CoV i can be calculated by
4
gi(t) = c0(t) β ci(t)
(cid:88)
(cid:16)
=
w(t)
j
1 β Ξ¦
(cid:16)
X (t)
0,j
(cid:17)(cid:17)
(cid:16)
Ξ¦
0,j βͺ ΜX (t)
X (t)
i,j
(cid:17)
.
(5)
jβOt
In other words, the gain is the sum of the weighted costs for
newly detected objects. However, this perception gain from the
scheduled CoV is available only when the detection is finished
at the end of a time slot.
C. Problem Formulation
Consider the ego vehicle driving on a trip over T time slots.
During the trip, other traffic participants travel alongside the
ego vehicle and form highly dynamic occlusion relationships
and volatile wireless links. Among them, the CoVs may come
close and leave at certain times during the trip. Consequently,
the set of candidate CoVs Vt and their perception gain gi(t)
are constantly evolving. The objective is to maximize the total
perception gain of cooperative perception by optimizing the
scheduling decisions of the ego vehicle. The sensor scheduling
problem is formulated as
max
a1,...,aT
1
T
T
(cid:88)
t=1
gat(t),
s.t. at β Vt,
(6)
(7)
Perception Gain Evaluation: One of the usual metrics for
object detection is recall, defined as the number of detected
objects divided by the total number of objects. In the auto-
mated driving scenario, objects can have different importance
to the ego vehicle, and thus we consider the sum of importance
the
weight for missed objects in the metric. Specifically,
perception cost of standalone intelligence is given by
c0(t) =
(cid:88)
(cid:16)
w(t)
j
1 β Ξ¦
(cid:17)(cid:17)
(cid:16)
X (t)
0,j
,
(3)
jβOt
where w(t)
is the importance weight of object j at time slot
j
t. The importance weights relate to the distance or the future
trajectory of the ego vehicle, and it is up to the implementation.
As a special case, minimizing the perception cost is equivalent
to maximizing the recall when the importance weights are
equal. With the shared data from the CoV i, the ego vehicle
performs CP to augment the standalone perception, and the
cost is
ci(t) =
(cid:88)
(cid:16)
w(t)
j
1 β Ξ¦
(cid:16)
X (t)
0,j
(cid:17)(cid:17) (cid:16)
1 β Ξ¦
(cid:16)
0,j βͺ ΜX (t)
X (t)
i,j
(cid:17)(cid:17)
.
jβOt
(4)
The cost of cooperative perception is determined by not only
the viewpoint but also the transmission rate that decides the
quality of shared data. A major challenge in the evaluation of
perception quality is that without the knowledge of ground
the actual perception costs c0(t) and ci(t) are
truths Ot,
where at is the optimization variable, representing the index
of the scheduled CoV in time slot t.
Note that there are some subtleties in this problem. Firstly,
since there is no complete information of everything on the
road, it is usually hard to directly estimate the gain gi(t) due to
unpredictable occlusions. Moreover, only the perception gain
of scheduled CoV, i.e., gat(t), is available at the end of time
slot t, while the other unscheduled CoVs are not observed.
Therefore, the offline optimal solution to (6), i.e.,
aβ
t = arg max
atβVt
gat(t),
(8)
is not feasible in practice.
Nevertheless, we seek to leverage the temporal continuity
of gi(t) and propose to learn the gains online from historical
observations ga1 (1), ga2(2), . . . , gatβ1(tβ1). Specifically, due
to the velocity limit, the relative positions among CoVs and
their perspectives cannot drift too much from time slot to
time slot. This type of problem falls in the category of the
restless multi-armed bandits (RMAB) [18], where the CoVs
correspond to the arms. The change of gi(t) from the last
observation requires the algorithm to schedule every candidate
CoV once in a while to gain knowledge of its latest perception
gain. This process is termed exploration. On the other hand,
the empirically optimal CoV should be scheduled frequently to
exploit the knowledge. The target is to learn and schedule the
optimal CoV aβ
t while balancing exploration and exploitation.
IV. MASS: MOBILITY-AWARE SENSOR SCHEDULING
ALGORITHM
In this section, we develop an online learning-based algo-
rithm to tackle the decentralized sensor scheduling problem in
CP. Compared with existing solutions, our algorithm considers
the dynamics of perception gains due to vehicular mobility and
has negligible communication and computation overhead.
It is well known that the Upper Confidence Bound (UCB)
algorithm [15] is an optimal solution to stationary multi-armed
bandits problems, where the rewards of arms have stationary
distributions. The UCB algorithm gradually eliminates the
randomness in the rewards and schedules the most promising
arm in each time slot. On the contrary, our problem deals
with dynamics rather than randomness. The intuition is that,
rather than shrinking the confidence bound with more trials,
we should enlarge the confidence bound for idle CoVs over
time in this problem.
We propose a low-complexity yet effective algorithm named
MASS, as described in Algorithm 1, to schedule CoVs to share
their sensor data. This algorithm maintains confidence bounds
of perception gains for all candidate CoVs and schedules
the CoV with the maximum upper confidence bound. The
confidence bounds are computed based on the historical obser-
vations and properties of the assumed underlying process gi(t).
Since the variation of perception gains is mainly influenced by
frequent blockages due to mobility, without loss of generality,
we approximate the increment of gi(t) by independent, nor-
mally distributed random variables. Therefore, the confidence
bound of a nearby CoV is proportional to the square root of
its idle time. The scale of confidence bounds is specified by a
parameter Ξ² that depends on the rate of change in gi(t) and the
confidence level. When Ξ² takes a larger value, the algorithm
is more aggressive in exploration.
In Algorithm 1, Line 2 is the CoV discovery phase, when
the ego vehicle determines the candidate set of available CoVs
with maximum size Vmax, based on beacon messages. In Lines
3-4, the newly available CoV is explored once by immediately
sending a sensor data request if one exists. Otherwise, in
Line 6, we calculate the upper confidence bound Μgi(t) of
the perception gain for each CoV. Specifically, Λgi is the last-
seen gain of CoV i, and the padding function depends on
the last-seen time Οi and the parameter Ξ². The motivation
for using the last-seen gain rather than all observations is
that dynamics is more significant than randomness due to the
mobility of vehicles, which will be shown in Section VI-B
through experiments. The key intuition is that the reward of
scheduling a CoV consists of its perception gain and the
knowledge of its exact gain at t. This knowledge is crucial
in the problem since the perception gain is highly dynamic.
We must ensure a moderate level of exploration to avoid
missing the optimal CoV. Therefore, in Line 7, the ego vehicle
optimistically schedules CoV at with the maximum upper
confidence bound. In Lines 9-12, the sensor data, compressed
if the transmission rate is inadequate, is then sent to the ego
vehicle for sensor fusion, detection, and evaluation. Finally,
the last-seen gain and last-seen time of CoV at are updated
for future scheduling.
5
Algorithm 1 MASS: Mobility-Aware Sensor Scheduling Al-
gorithm
Parameter: Ξ²
1: for t = 1, * * * , T do
2:
Determine the candidate set of available CoVs Vt.
if any CoV i β Vt has not been scheduled then
Schedule CoV i, i.e., at = i.
else
Calculate the upper confidence bound for each CoV
i β Vt:
Μgi(t) = Λgi + Ξ²
t β Οi.
(9)
β
Schedule the CoV at with the maximum upper con-
fidence bound, ties broken arbitrarily:
at = arg max
iβVt
Μgi(t).
(10)
end if
Send a request to CoV at for sensor data, compressed
subject to (2) if the transmission rate is inadequate.
Receive the sensor data, run the object detector, and
evaluate the perception gain gat(t) by (5).
Update the last-seen gain of CoV at:
3:
4:
5:
6:
7:
8:
9:
10:
11:
Λgat = gat(t).
12:
Update the last-seen time of CoV at:
Οat = t.
13: end for
(11)
(12)
Overhead Analysis: In the scheduling of decentralized
cooperative perception, frequent metadata message exchanges
and data processing introduces extra overhead. This inevitably
adds latency to the perception pipeline, which may compro-
mise the actual perception quality. We compare the com-
munication and computation overhead of our proposed al-
gorithm with existing centralized and distributed scheduling
methods. Assume there are N CoVs that request and provide
the sensor data simultaneously. In the MASS algorithm, the
few bits of data format information are piggybacked on the
periodically broadcast beacons. Consequently, there are totally
O(N 2) simple computations among N CoVs and negligible
communication overhead for scheduling decisions.
Conventional scheduling algorithms usually require much
more detailed perceptual state information of all CoVs. For
example, an RSU-based algorithm in [27] requires the visi-
bility grid states from all CoVs for global scheduling. This
procedure takes at least 2N extra messages to communicate
with the edge server and a computation load of O(GN 2) for
the deep reinforcement learning algorithm, where G is the
number of grids. On the other hand, Who2com [35] proposes
a handshake mechanism for distributed scheduling. Each CoV
first broadcasts a request message with compressed sensor
data, then computes the matching scores with the candidates'
message. It involves O(N 2) neural network attention opera-
tions and N 2 extra messages to feedback the scores before
initializing a connection. Similarly, Where2com [13] utilizes
confidence-aware spatial maps to decide the most beneficial
CoV. Although it reduces the communication amount with the
attention mechanism, multiple rounds of message exchange
and fusion process still take much time. By comparison, our
proposed MASS algorithm enjoys the advantage of low over-
head thanks to online learning, by harnessing the dynamics of
the perception gain.
V. PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS
In this section, we characterize the perception performance
of our proposed MASS algorithm in the fixed and dynamic
CoV candidate scenarios, respectively.
A. Assumptions
For theoretical analysis, we first normalize the perception
gain gi(t) to the fundamental interval [0, 1]:
Gi(t) = min{gi(t)/gmax, 1},
(13)
where gmax is a threshold to restrict the maximum possible
perception gain. We assume that Gi(t) independently follows
a Gaussian random walk with reflecting boundaries:
Gi(t + 1) = fI (Gi(t) + Xi(t)),
(14)
6
sublinear to T . Therefore, we define the expected average
learning regret of a scheduling algorithm A as
ΜRA =
1
T
E [RA(T )],
(17)
where the expectation is taken over all sample paths of the
stochastic processes Gi(t). In the following subsections, we
derive the upper bounds on the expected learning regret of the
MASS algorithm under both fixed and dynamic CoV candidate
settings.
B. Bounds on Two Fixed Candidate CoVs
We first investigate a simplified problem by assuming there
are two fixed candidate CoVs, i.e., Vt = V = {1, 2}. As in
[20], define a function f to be well-behaved on an interval
[t1, t2] if
(18)
|f (t) β f (t(cid:48))| β€ cf
(cid:112)|t β t(cid:48)|Ο, βt, t(cid:48) β [t1, t2] β© N,
Ο )1/2 is a large enough constant
where cf = Ξ(log 1
to
guarantee low violation probability. Furthermore, we define
a problem instance to be well-behaved near t if the per-
ception gains of all CoVs are well-behaved on the interval
[t β Οβ2, t + Οβ2]. Note that when t β€ Οβ2 or t β₯ T β Οβ2,
the definition is on the interval [t β Οβ2, t + Οβ2] β© [0, T ].
Define Et as the event that the problem is well-behaved near
t. The following lemma bounds the violation probability of
well-behavedness.
where Xi(t) takes an i.i.d. sample from N (0, Ο2), and
fI (x) =
(cid:40)
x(cid:48) < 1
x(cid:48),
2 β x(cid:48),
x(cid:48) β₯ 1,
Lemma 1. Let cf = 3(log 1
Ο )1/2. For a problem instance, the
violation probability of the well-behavedness near t satisfies
(15)
P ( ΜEt) < O(Ο2.4).
(19)
where x(cid:48) β‘ x (mod 2). In practice, the perception gain is
influenced by many factors, such as the instantaneous occlu-
sion status, available data rate, and time-varying importance
weights. Therefore, it is appropriate to regard the increment
of Gi(t) as Gaussian random variables by the central limit
theorem. The standard deviation of the increment Ο reflects
the rate of change in the traffic environment. Generally, when
Ο is smaller, better perception quality can be achieved since
the perception gains are less dynamic. In the analysis below,
we will measure the performance with respect to Ο.
According to the dynamics (14), Gi(t) is ergodic and
has uniform stationary distribution on [0, 1]. Without
loss
of generality, we also assume that the initial states Gi(0)
follow the stationary distribution. In an RMAB problem,
the performance of an algorithm is usually measured by a
learning regret, defined as the performance loss compared to
the offline optimal solution. Given a specific problem instance,
the learning regret of a scheduling algorithm A by time slot
T is written as
RA(T ) =
T
(cid:88)
t=1
[Gβ(t) β Gat(t)] ,
(16)
where Gβ(t) = Gaβ
(t) is the normalized gain of the optimal
CoV. Since Gi(t) is constantly shifting during the trip, no
online algorithm can achieve an upper bound of learning regret
t
Proof. See Appendix A.
At time t, define the leader as the CoV with maximum last-
seen gain. Let H β(t) denote the gain of the leader, and Οi(t)
denote the last-seen time of CoV i at time t. We divide the
average learning regret into two parts:
RA(T ) = Rβ(T ) +
2
(cid:88)
i=1
Ri(T ),
(20)
where the first part denotes the gain difference between the
optimal CoV and the leader, i.e.,
Rβ(T ) =
T
(cid:88)
t=1
[Gβ(t) β H β(t)] ,
(21)
and the second part is the gain difference between the leader
and the scheduled CoV, i.e.,
Ri(T ) =
=
β€
T
(cid:88)
t=1
T
(cid:88)
t=1
T
(cid:88)
t=1
[H β(t) β Gat(t)]
I(at = i) [H β(t) β Gi(t)]
H β(Οi(t)) β Gi(Οi(t))
t β Οi(t)
,
(22)
(23)
(24)
where we spread the regret incurred at time Οi(t) over the
subsequent idle time.
We set the algorithm parameter Ξ² = 5cf , and provide
some basic deterministic properties of the proposed MASS
algorithm conditioned on Et.
Lemma 2. For a problem instance well-behaved near t, the
MASS algorithm has the following properties:
a) The optimal CoV at time t is scheduled no later than
t + 1.
b) The leader at time t is scheduled no later than t + 1.
c) The change of the leader's gain in one slot is lower
bounded by
H β(t + 1) β H β(t) β₯ β2cf Ο.
(25)
d) The gain difference between the optimal CoV and the
leader is bounded by
Gβ(t) β H β(t) < 5cf Ο.
(26)
Proof. See Appendix B.
Let Ξ΄i(t) = H β(t) β Gi(t). To bound Ri(T ), it is important
to characterize a relationship between Ξ΄i(Οi(t)) and t β Οi(t).
Lemma 3. For a problem instance well-behaved near t, with
the MASS algorithm we have:
a) if CoV i is not optimal at t, then
t β Οi(t) β₯ Ξ©(Ξ΄i(t)/Ξ²Ο)2,
Ξ΄i(Οi(t)) β€ 2Ξ΄i(t) + O(cf Ο).
b) If CoV i is optimal at t, then
Ξ΄i(Οi(t)) β€ O(cf Ο).
Proof. See Appendix C.
(27)
(28)
(29)
The intuition behind Lemma 3 is that after scheduling a sub-
optimal CoV, the subsequent idle time is proportional to the
quadratic of the sub-optimality gap. It is important to note that
Lemma 2 and Lemma 3 are deterministic, conditioned on the
well-behavedness of the problem instance. Next, we deal with
the conditional probability and bound the expected learning
regret of the MASS algorithm with two fixed candidate CoVs.
Theorem 1 (Fixed Candidates). Let Ξ² = 15Ο log Οβ1. For
a sufficiently long trip T β₯ Ξ©(Οβ2), the expected average
learning regret of MASS with two fixed candidate CoV is
bounded by
ΜRMASS β€ O (cid:0)Ο2 log3(1/Ο)(cid:1) .
(30)
Proof. See Appendix D.
Remark. This theorem utilizes the uniform stationary distribu-
tion of ergodic process Gi(t) to bound the expected average
learning regret. The key of the proof is that the gap between
two CoVs, G1(t)βG2(t), has a very high probability of being
much larger than Ο. Then the expected regret can be bounded
using Lemma 3 by conditional probabilities. Note that the
expected average learning regret is lower bounded by O(Ο2)
for any online algorithm [20]. Our algorithm is near-optimal
in the sense that our upper bound matches the lower bound
up to a logarithmic factor.
7
C. Bounds on Dynamic Candidate CoVs
During the trip, the candidate set of available CoVs Vt
changes occasionally. In the following algorithm, we will
divide the trip into periods by the arrival times of candidate
CoVs, and bound the regret in each period using Theorem 1.
Theorem 2 (Dynamic Candidates). Let Ξ² = 15Ο log Οβ1. For
a sufficient long trip T β₯ Ξ©(Οβ2) with a dynamic candidate
CoV set satisfying |Vt| β€ 2, the expected average learning
regret of MASS is bounded by
ΜRMASS β€ O (cid:0)Ο2 log3(1/Ο)(cid:1) + 2Ξ»,
(31)
where Ξ» is the arrival rate of candidate CoVs. When Ξ» β€
O (cid:0)Ο2 log3(1/Ο)(cid:1),
is
bounded by
the expected average learning regret
ΜRMASS β€ O (cid:0)Ο2 log3(1/Ο)(cid:1) .
(32)
Proof. See Appendix E.
It is much more difficult to prove the bound for any number
of candidate CoVs since it is hard to guarantee the basic
properties in Lemma 2 without extra constraints. A similar
algorithm with an activation mechanism is proposed in [20].
Specifically, when the upper confidence bound of a candidate
is larger than the last-seen gain of the leader, it is activated
until scheduled. The earliest activated candidate is scheduled
in odd-numbered time slots, while in even-numbered time
slots the leader is exploited. Although the additional rules
facilitate a bound for any number of candidate CoVs, this
algorithm is less efficient than our proposed MASS algorithm.
We will show through experiments in Section VI-B that this
algorithm compromises the regret performance. Moreover,
we also conjecture that the regret bound also exists for our
proposed MASS algorithm with any number of candidate
CoVs, described as follows.
Conjecture 1. Let Ξ² = 15Ο log Οβ1. For a sufficient long trip
T β₯ Ξ©(Οβ2) with a dynamic candidate CoV set satisfying
|Vt| β€ Vmax, the expected average learning regret of MASS is
bounded by
ΜRMASS β€ O (cid:0)VmaxΟ2 log3(1/Ο)(cid:1) + 2Ξ».
(33)
where Ξ» is the arrival rate of candidate CoVs. When Ξ» β€
O (cid:0)VmaxΟ2 log3(1/Ο)(cid:1), the expected average learning regret
is bounded by
ΜRMASS β€ O (cid:0)VmaxΟ2 log3(1/Ο)(cid:1) .
(34)
VI. EXPERIMENTS
In this section, we first conduct empirical studies on the
LiDAR-based object detection to characterize a relationship
between the input sensor data X and the output of the object
detector Ξ¦(X ). Then based on the empirical model, extensive
simulations are conducted to evaluate the perception gain
of the proposed MASS algorithm, compared with baseline
algorithms. Finally, a case study is provided to compare the
behavior of different online algorithms qualitatively.
8
Fig. 3. The empirical probability of missing an object with respect to the
number of scanned points (in log scale).
increased as well in Fig. 2b. Our evaluation of the perception
gain depends on high precision since the gain is calculated
based on the additional detections from CP. Moreover,
it
is reasonable to observe the trade-off that when the score
threshold increases, the precision enhances while the recall
degrades. To strike a balance between recall and precision, in
the following experiments, the score threshold is set to 0.4.
With mean precision as high as 0.99 for CP, we can safely
approximate the perception gain from the newly detected
objects, neglecting the false positives.
Now turn to the relationship between the detection result
and the scanned LiDAR points of an object. As shown in Fig.
3, the ground-truth objects are binned based on the number
of points within the labeled 3D bounding boxes in log scale.
Then we fit the missed detection probability to the exponential
distribution and obtain the best fit with goodness R2 = 0.994.
The statistics implies that the empirical probability of missing
an object is approximately a power function of the number of
scanned points on the object, i.e.,
(cid:17)
(cid:17)
(cid:16)
(cid:16)
= 1
= eβ0.4343 log2 NX = N β0.6265
,
P
Ξ¦
(35)
X (t)
0,j
X
where NX denotes the number of points on an object.
Based on this observation, in the simulation of the following
subsection, we will assume the detection result of an object is
determined by the number of scanned points, neglecting other
factors. Therefore, for each object j β Ot, a minimum number
of scanned points Nj are required for accurate detection,
representing the difficulty of the object. This assumption is
reasonable since a certain number of points are needed to
exhibit the texture and shape information of a particular object.
the object difficulty Nj follows a long-tail zeta
By (35),
random distribution with cumulative distribution function
FN (n) = nβ0.6265.
(36)
Then with CP, the total number of points on an object is
increased, thus improving the chance of accurate detection.
B. Simulation with Detection Model
We first generate mobility traces in BEV using the micro-
scopic traffic simulator SUMO [40], highlighting the sensor
coverage and occlusion relationships. A Manhattan-like map
is created with a 4-by-4 grid, as shown in Fig. 4. The street is
bidirectional, with two lanes and a sidewalk in each direction,
(a)
(b)
Fig. 2. Performances of CP over standalone perception at different score
thresholds. (a) The mean recall. (b) The mean precision.
A. Empirical Studies on LiDAR-based Perception
We conduct 3D object detection experiments on an open-
source large-scale automated driving dataset, DOLPHINS
[36]. It is generated using the CARLA [37] traffic simulator,
with a realistic environment rendered in six different scenarios,
including intersections, highways, and T-junctions. The dataset
features the support for V2X, providing temporally-aligned
sensor data from the ego vehicle, a collaborative vehicle,
and an RSU. There are 42,376 frames of sensor data with
3D bounding box labels for cars and pedestrians. The ego
vehicle is required to detect all the other traffic participants,
including the occluded, within [-100m, 100m] in the driving
direction and [-40m, 40m] in the perpendicular direction. For
generality and robustness, we focus on the raw-level sensor
fusion, using point clouds scanned by LiDARs installed on
the top of vehicles. Based on the pose information, the raw
point clouds are merged after the coordinate transformation.
The dataset is randomly split into the training, validation, and
test sets with a 60%:20%:20% ratio. We adopt a popular
LiDAR-based 3D detection model, PointPillars [38], with
pillar size 0.16mΓ0.16m. The intersection-over-union (IoU)
threshold for accurate detection is set as 0.7 and 0.3 for cars
and pedestrians, respectively. With an open-source platform
OpenPCDet [39], we train the model for 200 epochs using the
one-cycle Adam optimizer.
We run the detection task on the test set and obtain mean
i.e., cars
recall and precision results over two categories,
and pedestrians. The score threshold for a positive detection
sweeps from 0.1 to 0.7. As shown in Fig. 2a,
the recall
is significantly improved by the supplementary view, which
shows the great potential of CP. Besides, the precision, defined
as the ratio of true detections to all detections, is slightly
0.10.20.30.40.50.60.7Score Threshold0.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.91Mean RecallCPStandalone Perception0.10.20.30.40.50.60.7Score Threshold0.650.70.750.80.850.90.951Mean PrecisionCPStandalone Perception1248163264128256512# of Scanned Points00.20.40.60.81Probability of Missing an Object 9
TABLE I
SIMULATION PARAMETERS
Parameters
Values
Length of Time Slot
Number of Cars
CoV Ratio
Speed Limit of Cars
Turning Probabilities
Arrival Rate of Pedestrians
Speed of Pedestrians
0.1s
200
30%
50km/h
0.25 (Left), 0.25 (Right)
0.2 persons/s
1.2m/s
LiDAR-Related
# of Lasers
Vertical Field-of-view
Maximum Range
Height of Objects
Angular Resolution
Data Rate (64 channels)
16, 32, 64
26.8β¦
100m
1.7m
0.09β¦
33.27Mbps
V2X-Related
Carrier Frequency
Transmission Power
Noise Power Spectral Density
Receiver Noise Figure
Shadowing Fading Std. Dev.
Vehicle Blockage Loss
Channel Bandwidth
Available Comm. Resource Ratio
Transition Time of Resource Ratio
5.9GHz
23dBm
-174dBm/Hz
9dB
3dB (LOS, NLOSv), 4dB (NLOS)
max{0, N (5, 4)} dB
30MHz
1.2MHz, 6MHz, 30MHz
10s
Fig. 4. An illustration of the map created in SUMO with a zoomed snapshot
at an intersection.
and the side length of a block is 200 meters. The blocks
represent the space for buildings, which occludes the sight of
perpendicular directions, causing blind zones. The traffic flow
is controlled by the traffic lights at intersections, leading to
queues of cars waiting to enter the intersection as well as some
occlusions. While the total number of cars is fixed, pedestrians
are spawned randomly at the endpoints of each sidewalk and
move towards the other endpoint as destinations. Based on
the empirical modeling of perception in the subsection above,
we randomly assign the difficulties, the minimum number of
LiDAR points for correct detection, to each car and pedestrian.
We randomly select one vehicle as the ego vehicle, which
aims to perceive the other traffic participants within 100m
using CP. The importance weight of objects is calculated by
w(t)
j =
ο£±


1,
2 β log10 d(t)
j ,
0,
d(t)
j β€ 10,
10 < d(t)
d(t)
j β₯ 100,
j < 100,
(37)
where d(t)
is the distance between the object j and the ego
j
vehicle. Define CoV ratio as the proportion of CoVs with
sensor sharing functionality among vehicles on the road. Each
CoV, including the ego vehicle, is equipped with an omni-
directional LiDAR on the top. We simulate the laser scanning
process in the experiment, considering the blockage effect of
vehicles and buildings. During the trip, the CoVs within 100
meters from the ego vehicle are identified as candidates since
they are more likely to help reveal important objects.
Due to the decentralized congestion control (DCC) mecha-
nism of the V2X network [41], the LiDAR point clouds are
down-sampled when the communication bandwidth is inade-
quate. For each CoV, the evolution of available communication
resource ratio Ξ·i(t) is modeled by independent Markov chains
with three states [42]. Besides, we adopt the V2V sidelink
channel models in 3GPP TR 37.885 [43], which introduces the
NLOSv state, in which the direct path is blocked by vehicles.
Unlike the conventional NLOS channel that assumes blockage
by larger objects such as buildings, the behavior of NLOSv
channel is closer to a LOS channel with extra attenuation. In
the urban setting, the pathloss of the LOS and the NLOSv
channels are specified by
P LLOS = 38.77 + 16.7 log10 d + 18.2 log10 fc,
(38)
where the NLoSv channel adds an extra blockage loss for each
vehicle. On the other hand, the pathloss of the NLOS channel
Fig. 5. A sample path on the evolution of perception gains of nearby CoVs.
The start point of a curve represents that a CoV is approaching the ego vehicle
and becomes a candidate. The end point represents that the CoV is no longer
a candidate.
is given by
P LNLOS = 36.85 + 30 log10 d + 18.9 log10 fc.
(39)
The simulation parameters are summarized in Table I. We
simulate for T = 104 time slots, corresponding to a trip of
1,000 seconds. An exemplary sample path of the perception
gains is plotted in Fig. 5.
In the following, we compare the proposed MASS algo-
rithm to four baselines: 1) Closest CoV is a naive policy
without regard to historical observations. It is supported by
the fact that the closest CoV usually has a good viewpoint
for closer objects which have greater importance weights,
and the pathloss is minimum. 2) In Periodic ETC (Periodic
Explore-Then-Commit), the time is divided into epochs of
1011121314151617181920Time (s)0123456Perception GainCoV 1CoV 2CoV 3CoV 4CoV 5 TABLE II
SWEEPING PARAMETERS IN ALGORITHMS
Algorithm
Parameter
Range of Value
Closest CoV
Periodic ETC
SW-UCB
Earliest Activation
MASS
-
Epoch Length
Horizon Length
Scale of UCB Ξ²
Scale of UCB Ξ²
Scale of UCB Ξ²
-
{2,3,...101}
{5,10,20,30,40}
[10β1, 101] (log scale)
[10β1, 100.5] (log scale)
[10β0.9, 100.6] (log scale)
10
(a)
(b)
Fig. 6. The average regret of different scheduling policies with sweeping
algorithm parameters. The ranges of parameters for each algorithm are
specified in Table II. The optimal regrets of scheduling policies are marked
on the figure.
equal length. At the beginning of an epoch, each candidate is
explored once, then for the rest of the epoch, the CoV with the
maximum empirical perception gain is scheduled. 3) SW-UCB
(Sliding Window UCB) [19] is adapted from the classic UCB
algorithm, using the averaged observed rewards on a fixed-size
horizon rather than the infinite horizon. 4) Earliest Activated
[20] is another online algorithm for restless bandit problem.
It explores the earliest activated CoV in odd-numbered time
slots and exploits the leader in even-numbered time slots. For
a fair comparison, the algorithms are evaluated with sweeping
parameters, summarized in Table II.
Fig. 6 shows the average learning regret for sweeping
algorithm parameters. The average learning regret reflects
the perception cost difference to the offline optimal decision
across time. With reasonable parameters, all
the learning-
based algorithms, including SW-UCB, Earliest Activated, and
the proposed MASS algorithm, outperform the distance-based
policy, showing the benefit of learning from historical observa-
tions. Among the learning-based algorithms, MASS achieves
a uniformly better regret performance than other algorithms
in a wide range of parameter values. Furthermore, a well-
tuned parameter can minimize the average regret, shown by
the markers on the curves. The optimal parameter of the MASS
algorithm is influenced by the rate of change in the perception
gain, as stated in Section V.
Fig. 7 compares the average perception gain of scheduling
policies at optimal parameters during the trip under different
CoV ratios. We make three observations as follows. First, the
Fig. 7. Comparisons of scheduling algorithms under different CoV ratios. a)
The perception gain. b) The recall value.
perception gain generally increases when the CoV ratio is
higher. Typically, when there are more candidate CoVs, the
gain from the optimal CoV is higher, and thus the perfor-
mance is improved when the optimal CoV is exploited. With
different CoV ratios, the MASS algorithm has stable optimal
parameters around Ξ² β 0.6, showing its robustness to the
number of candidates. Second, the MASS algorithm performs
uniformly the best with all CoV ratios. The perception gain
is improved by up to 49% compared to position-based policy
and 12% compared to other learning-based algorithms in high
CoV ratio settings. The advantage over SW-UCB implies
an essential finding that dynamics is more significant than
randomness due to the high-mobility nature of the automated
driving scenario. In contrast to the Periodic ETC algorithm
that explores regularly, MASS explores more efficiently by
adapting to the actual state. Finally, although the optimization
objective is not precisely aligned to the recall, the MASS
algorithm achieves the best perception performance. The recall
is improved by up to 4.2 percentage points compared to other
learning-based algorithms in the high CoV ratio setting, which
is a considerable gain in the context of automated driving.
C. Case Study: A Trace with LiDAR Frames
To further illustrate the benefits of adaptive exploration,
we conduct a case study with a CARLA-generated trace of
LiDAR frames. For a hundred frames, the LiDAR point clouds
from the ego vehicle and four other CoVs are simultaneously
recorded during a trip of 50 seconds. The trajectories of the
vehicles on the town map are shown in Fig. 8. In each time
102030405060708090100Index of Parameter in Algorithms00.20.40.60.811.21.41.61.82Average RegretClosest CoVPeriodic ETCSW-UCBEarliest ActivatedMASS [Proposed]10%30%50%70%CoV Ratio2.533.544.555.56Average Perception GainClosest CoVPeriodic ETCSW-UCBEarliest ActivatedMASS [Proposed]10%30%50%70%CoV Ratio70%72%74%76%78%80%82%Average RecallClosest CoVPeriodic ETCSW-UCBEarliest ActivatedMASS [Proposed] 11
(a)
(b)
Fig. 10. Visualization of the merged point clouds and detection results. (a) The
merged point clouds when CoV 1 is scheduled by Closest CoV and Periodic
ETC algorithms. (b) The merged point clouds when CoV 2 is scheduled by
the proposed MASS algorithm.
Such a process takes full advantage of the information within
the historical detection results and learns to make optimal
decisions, which is the core intuition of our algorithm.
VII. CONCLUSION
In this paper, we have studied the scheduling of decen-
tralized cooperative perception within the RMAB framework,
fully considering the mobility of CoVs. A mobility-aware
sensor scheduling (MASS) algorithm has been proposed to
maximize the average perception gain, leveraging the temporal
continuity of perception gains. The MASS algorithm enables
each CoV to learn the perception gains from candidates in a
distributed manner, without the overhead of frequent meta-
information exchanges. An upper bound for the expected
average learning regret is provided that matches the lower
bound of any online algorithm up to a logarithmic factor. We
have evaluated the MASS algorithm under a realistic SUMO
trace, showing that the proposed algorithm can improve the
average perception gain by up to 12% and the recall by up
to 4.2 percentage points, compared to other learning-based
algorithms. Finally, a case study has been presented to show
the superiority of adaptive exploration from our proposed
algorithm.
For future work, we plan to extend the sensor scheduling
problem towards more sources, using the combinatorial multi-
armed bandit framework [44]. Note that the reward is then
non-linear since the perception gains of different sources
are not independent. Besides, we will study the uncertainty
reduction modeling of the perception gain [45] to incorporate
the influence of false positives in the perception performance.
APPENDIX A
PROOF OF LEMMA 1
Define the event
(cid:110)
E(i)
t,t(cid:48) =
|Gi(t) β Gi(t(cid:48))| β€ cf
(cid:112)|t β t(cid:48)|Ο
(cid:111)
.
Fig. 8. The trajectories of the ego vehicle and other CoVs on the CARLA
town map. The position of the ego vehicle is marked every 10 seconds.
Fig. 9. The comparison of moving average perception costs of different
scheduling algorithms.
slot, the ego vehicle identifies the CoVs within 100 meters
as candidates and selects a CoV to schedule. For sensor
fusion, the received point clouds are transformed into the
view of the ego vehicle and then appended together with
the onboard sensor data. Then it is feed into the 3D object
detector, PointPillars, to obtain the perception results. Several
representative algorithms are tested, including the one-shot
distance-based Closest CoV, the regularly exploring Periodic
ETC, and the adaptively exploring MASS algorithm. The
standalone perception and CP with the offline optimal CoV
serve as the upper and lower bounds for the perception cost,
respectively.
As shown in Fig. 9, the MASS algorithm achieves the best
perception quality, consistent with the simulation results. We
further visualize the merged point clouds and detection results,
as illustrated in Fig. 10. At around 38.0s, the ego vehicle is
leaving the roundabout, when two cars and one pedestrian are
invisible due to the blockage effect. The CoV 1 in front is
scheduled with the Closest CoV policy and the Periodic ETC
in the exploitation phase. However, as shown in Fig. 10(a),
there is no traffic in front, and thus the extra sensor has no
gain. Owing to the adaptive exploration, the MASS algorithm
is aware of the decrease in the leader's gain. Therefore, the
ego vehicle explores and quickly identifies CoV 2 as the new
leader since it reveals three additional objects in Fig. 10(b).
LegendEgoCoV 1CoV 2CoV 3CoV 410 sec20 sec30 sec40 sec50 sec50m100mScale0m0 sec01020304050Time (s)0.511.522.53Moving Average Perception CostStandalone PerceptionClosest CoVPeriodic ETC, =10sMASS [Proposed], =0.3Offline OptimalEgo VehicleCoV1(Scheduled)Missed TargetsEgo VehicleCoV2(Scheduled)Newly Detected 12
2cf Ο.
By assumption, Gi(t) β Gi(t(cid:48)) βΌ N (0, |t β t(cid:48)|Ο2), thus
If CoV 1 is scheduled at t β 1, then
eβx2/2dx
G1(t + 1) β G2(t) β₯ G1(t + 1) β G1(t β 1) β₯ β
β
P (E(i)
t,t(cid:48)) = 1 β 2
(cid:90) β
1
2Ο
cf
= 1 β O (cid:0)log Οβ1(cid:1)β1/2
eβ 9
2 log Οβ1
β₯ 1 β O(Ο4.4).
Then
2
(cid:89)
t+Οβ2
(cid:89)
P (Et) β₯
P (E(i)
t,t(cid:48)) > 1 β O(Ο2.4).
t(cid:48)=tβΟβ2
Therefore, P ( ΜEt) < O(Ο2.4).
i=1
APPENDIX B
PROOF OF LEMMA 2
In the proposed algorithm, the last-seen time Οi(t) must
exist and satisfies t β Οi(t) < Οβ2. For simplicity, we denote
Οi = Οi(t) when there is no confusion.
a) Without loss of generality, we assume CoV 1 is optimal
at t. If CoV 2 is scheduled at time t, then at t + 1,
G1(Ο1) + Ξ²Ο
β
t β Ο1 + 1 β₯ G1(t) β cf Ο
β
+ Ξ²Ο
t β Ο1 + 1
β
t β Ο1
> G2(t) + Ξ²Ο.
Therefore, CoV 1 must be scheduled no later than t + 1.
b) Without loss of generality, we assume CoV 1 is the leader
at t. If CoV 1 is not scheduled at time t β 1, then
β
G1(Ο1) + Ξ²
t β Ο1 β₯ G2(t β 1) + Ξ²Ο,
since G1(Ο1) β₯ G2(t β 1), and the proof is completed.
Otherwise, we have CoV 1 scheduled at t β 1 and CoV 2
scheduled at t, then
G1(Ο1) + Ξ²Ο
β
t β Ο1 β 1 β₯ G2(Ο2) + Ξ²Ο
β
t β Ο2 β 1. (40)
i) If Ο1 = t β 2, Ο2 β€ t β 3, then (40) implies
G1(t β 2) + Ξ²Ο β₯ G2(Ο2) + Ξ²Ο
β
t β Ο2 β 1.
Therefore, at time t + 1,
β
G1(t β 1) +
2Ξ²Ο β₯ G1(t β 2) + cf Ο +
> G2(t) + Ξ²Ο.
β
2Ξ²Ο
ii) If Ο2 = t β 2, Ο1 β€ t β 3, then at time t + 1,
β
β
G1(t β 1) +
2Ξ²Ο β₯ G2(t β 2) +
2Ξ²Ο > G2(t) + Ξ²Ο.
To sum up, CoV 1 is scheduled no later than t + 1.
c) The statement is trivially true if the leader stays the same
from t to t+1. Otherwise, Let CoV 1 be the leader at t+1, CoV
2 be the leader at t, H β(t + 1) β H β(t) = G1(t + 1) β G2(t).
i) Assume CoV 1 is scheduled at t, then CoV 2 must be
scheduled at t β 1. Therefore,
G1(t + 1) β G2(t) β₯ G1(t + 1) β G2(t β 1) β cf Ο
If CoV 2 is scheduled at t β 1, then
β
G1(t + 1) β G2(t) β₯ G1(Ο1) β
t β Ο1 + 1cf Ο β G2(t)
>
cf + Ξ²
Ξ²
β₯ β2cf Ο,
(G1(Ο1) β G2(t)) β 2cf Ο
where the second inequality is by (41).
d) Let CoV 1 be the optimal CoV at tβ2, which is scheduled
at t(cid:48) β {t β 2, t β 1}. Then either G1(t(cid:48)) β€ H β(t(cid:48)) or CoV 1
becomes the new leader at t(cid:48) + 1. Either of them leads to
H β(t(cid:48) + 1) β₯ G1(t(cid:48)) β cf Ο.
If t(cid:48) = t β 2, by c) we have
H β(t) β₯ H β(t β 1) β 2cf Ο β₯ Gi(t β 2) β 3cf Ο
= Gβ(t β 2) β 3cf Ο > Gβ(t) β 5cf Ο.
If t(cid:48) = t β 1,
H β(t) = Gi(t β 1) β cf Ο = Gi(t β 2) β 2cf Ο
= Gβ(t β 2) β 2cf Ο > Gβ(t) β 4cf Ο.
Therefore, Gβ(t) β H β(t) < 5cf Ο.
APPENDIX C
PROOF OF LEMMA 3
a) We focus on a sub-optimal CoV i and omit the subscript
i for simplicity. Since the problem instance is well-behaved
near t, for βt(cid:48) β [t β Οβ2, t + Οβ2],
β
|G(t(cid:48)) β G(Ο )| β€ cf
|H β(t(cid:48)) β H β(Ο )| β€ cf
β
t(cid:48) β Ο Ο,
t(cid:48) β Ο Ο + 5cf Ο.
Then
|Ξ΄(t(cid:48)) β Ξ΄(Ο )| β€ 2cf
β
t(cid:48) β Ο Ο + 5cf Ο.
If Ξ΄(t) β€ 20cf Ο, then CoV i is scheduled soon and trivially
t β Ο = O(1) = Ξ(Ξ΄i(t)/Ξ²Ο)2,
Ξ΄(Ο ) = O(cf Ο) = Ξ΄(t) + O(cf Ο),
which satisfies the condition. Otherwise, i) if Ξ΄(Ο ) < Ξ΄(t)/2,
β
2cf
t β Ο Ο β₯ |Ξ΄(t) β Ξ΄(Ο )| β 5cf Ο β₯ Ξ΄/4,
and thus t β Ο β₯ Ξ(Ξ΄(t)/cf Ο). ii) If Ξ΄(Ο ) β₯ Ξ΄(t)/2, we have
for βt(cid:48) β [Ο, t + Οβ2],
β
G(Ο ) + Ξ²Ο
t(cid:48) β Ο = H β(Ο ) β Ξ΄(Ο ) + Ξ²Ο
β
t(cid:48) β Ο
β€ H β(t(cid:48)) β Ξ΄(t)/2 + (cf + Ξ²)Ο
β
t(cid:48) β Ο .
β₯ G1(t + 1) β G1(t) β cf Ο β₯ β2cf Ο.
For any t(cid:48) satisfying t(cid:48) β t β€ O(Ξ΄(t)/Ξ²Ο)2,
ii) Assume CoV 2 is scheduled at t, we have
β
G1(Ο1) +
t β Ο1Ξ²Ο β€ G2(Ο2) +
β
t β Ο2Ξ²Ο.
(41)
β
G(Ο ) + Ξ²Ο
t(cid:48) β Ο β€ H β(t(cid:48)) + Ξ²Ο,
Therefore, t β Ο β₯ Ξ(Ξ΄(t)/Ξ²Ο).
During the unscheduled time t(cid:48) β (Ο, t], we have
β
Ξ²Ο
t(cid:48) β Ο β€ H β(t(cid:48)) + Ξ²Ο β G(Ο )
= Ξ΄(t(cid:48)) + G(t(cid:48)) β G(Ο ) + Ξ²Ο
β
β€ Ξ΄(t(cid:48)) + cf Ο
t(cid:48) β Ο + Ξ²Ο,
β
and consequently Ξ΄(t(cid:48)) β₯ 4cf
|Ξ΄(t(cid:48)) β Ξ΄(Ο )| β€ 2cf
t(cid:48) β Ο Ο β Ξ²Ο. Finally,
β
t(cid:48) β Ο Ο + O(cf Ο)
β€ Ξ΄(t(cid:48))/2 + O(cf Ο).
Let t(cid:48) = t, and we obtain Ξ΄(Ο ) β€ 2Ξ΄(t) + O(cf Ο).
b) Assume the CoV 1 is optimal at t. Suppose Ο1 < t β 2,
then CoV 2 is scheduled at t β 1. We have
β
β
G1(Ο1) + Ξ²
t β Ο1Ο β₯ G1(t) + 4
β₯ G2(t) + cf
3cf Ο
β
2Ο + Ξ²Ο,
which contradicts the scheduling decision. Thus, Ο1 β₯ t β 2,
and
β
Ξ΄1(Ο1) β€ 2
2cf Ο + 5cf Ο = O(cf Ο).
APPENDIX D
PROOF OF THEOREM 1
We first bound the expectation of Rβ(T ). By (26), define
the events
Ft = {Gβ(t) β H β(t) β (0, 5cf Ο)} ,
ΜFt = {Gβ(t) β H β(t) = 0} .
Since Gi(t) has uniform stationary distribution,
P (Ft) = P (|G1(t) β G2(t)| β (0, 5cf Ο)) β€ O(cf Ο),
and we obtain
E[Gβ(t) β H β(t)] = E[Gβ(t) β H β(t)|Et] * P (Et) + P ( ΜEt)
β€ E[Gβ(t) β H β(t)|Et, Ft] * P (EtFt)
+ 0 * P (Et ΜFt) + P ( ΜEt)
β€ O(cf Ο)2 + O(Ο2.4) β€ O(cf Ο)2.
Next we bound the the expectation of Ri(T ).
i) For sub-optimal CoV i, define the event Ξ = {Ξ΄i(t) =
Ξ΄, Gi(t) < Gβ(t)}, and we have
E
(cid:20) Ξ΄i(t)
t β Οi(t)
(cid:21)
|Ξ
β€ E
(cid:40)
β€
(cid:21)
|ΞEt
(cid:20) Ξ΄i(t)
t β Οi(t)
O (cid:0)(Ξ²Ο)2/Ξ΄(cid:1) ,
O(cf Ο),
+ 1 * P ( ΜEt|Ξ)
Ξ΄ > Ξ±cf Ο,
Ξ΄ < Ξ±cf Ο,
where we use (27), (28) at the second inequality, and Ξ± is a
large enough constant. The distribution of Ξ΄i(t) is bounded by
P (Ξ΄i(t) β€ Ξ΄|Gi(t) < Gβ(t) = Gβ)
β€P (Gβ(t) β Gi(t) β€ Ξ΄ + O(cf Ο)|Gi(t) < Gβ) β€
Ξ΄ + O(cf Ο)
Gβ
.
Integrating over Gβ,
P (Ξ΄i(t) β€ Ξ΄|Gi(t) < Gβ(t)) =
(cid:90) 1
f (Gβ)dGβ
0
Ξ΄ + O(cf Ο)
Gβ
= (Ξ΄ + O(cf Ο)) * E[1/Gβ]
β€ Ξ΄ + O(cf Ο).
13
Then,
E
(cid:20) Ξ΄i(t)
t β Οi(t)
|Gi(t) < Gβ(t)
(cid:21)
β€ O(cf Ο)2 +
(cid:90) 1
Ξ±cf Ο
β€ O(Ο2 log3(1/Ο)).
(Ξ²Ο)2
Ξ΄
dΞ΄
ii) For optimal CoV i, define Ξ = {Gi(t) = Gβ(t)}.
(cid:20) Ξ΄i(t)
t β Οi(t)
β€ O(Ο2 log2(1/Ο)),
(cid:20) Ξ΄i(t)
t β Οi(t)
(cid:21)
|Ft, Ξ
β€ E
|Ξ
E
(cid:21)
* P (Ft) + 0 * P ( ΜFt)
where the second inequality is by (29). To sum up,
(cid:34)
E
Rβ(T ) +
(cid:35)
Ri(T )
2
(cid:88)
i=1
E
Gβ(t) β H β(t) +
ΜRMASS =
β€
1
T
1
T
(cid:34)
T
(cid:88)
t=3
Ξ΄i(t)
t β Οi(t)
(cid:35)
+
2
T
2
(cid:88)
i=1
β€ O(Ο2 log3(1/Ο)).
APPENDIX E
PROOF OF THEOREM 2
Denote the arrival
time of new candidates CoV i by
s1, s2, * * * , sN . We split the whole trip into periods [1, s1 β
the beginning of the i-th
1], [s1, s2 β 1], * * * , [sN , T ]. At
period si, if Gi(si) > Gj(si), we augment the period to
[Οj(si), si+1 β 1] so that Οj(t) exists within the period for
t > si + 1. Then by Lemma 2, CoV j is sub-optimal
during [Οj(si), si β 2], otherwise CoV j should be scheduled
before si. Naturally, the scheduling decision is optimal at
[Οj(si) + 1, si β 2]. Therefore, we compute the expected
learning regret inside the i-th period,
si+1β1
(cid:88)
(cid:34)
Gβ(t) β H β(t) +
E
Ri β€
t=si+1
(cid:35)
2
(cid:88)
i=1
Ξ΄i(t)
t β Οi(t)
+ 2.
(42)
To sum up, we obtain the average expected learning rate using
the results in the proof of Theorem 1,
ΜRMASS =
β€
1
T
1
T
N
(cid:88)
i=1
N
(cid:88)
Ri
si+1β1
(cid:88)
(cid:34)
Gβ(t) β H β(t) +
E
t=si+1
(cid:21)
i=1
(cid:20) 2N
T
+ E
(cid:35)
2
(cid:88)
i=1
Ξ΄i(t)
t β Οi(t)
β€ O (cid:0)Ο2 log3(1/Ο)(cid:1) + 2Ξ».
When Ξ» β€ O (cid:0)Ο2 log3(1/Ο)(cid:1), ΜRMASS β€ O (cid:0)Ο2 log3(1/Ο)(cid:1) .
There is a final note that the number of candidates could be
less than two due to the departure of CoVs, when scheduling is
trivial. If |Vt| < 2 at the beginning of a period, then there is no
regret during the period. Otherwise, if any departure happens
inside the period, then there is no regret for the rest of the
period. In both cases, the regret is upper bounded by (42).
REFERENCES
[1] Y. Jia, R. Mao, Y. Sun, S. Zhou and Z. Niu, "Online V2X Scheduling for
Raw-Level Cooperative Perception," in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Commun.
(ICC), Seoul, South Korea, May 2022.
[2] Z. Li, W. Wang, H. Li, E. Xie, C. Sima, T. Lu, Q. Yu, J. Dai,
"BEVFormer: Learning Bird's-Eye-View Representation from Multi-
Camera Images via Spatiotemporal Transformers," in Proc. Eur. Conf.
Comput. Vis. (ECCV), Tel Aviv, Israel, Oct. 2022.
[3] X. Chen, H. Ma, J. Wan, B. Li, T. Xia, "Multi-view 3d object detection
network for autonomous driving," in Proc. IEEE Conf. Comput. Vis.
Pattern Recognit. (CVPR), Honolulu, USA, Jul. 2017.
[4] E. Arnold, O. Y. Al-Jarrah, M. Dianati, S. Fallah, D. Oxtoby and
A. Mouzakitis, "A Survey on 3D Object Detection Methods for Au-
tonomous Driving Applications," IEEE Trans. Intell. Transport. Syst.,
vol. 20, no. 10, pp. 3782-3795, Oct. 2019.
[5] D. Feng et al., "Deep Multi-Modal Object Detection and Semantic Seg-
mentation for Autonomous Driving: Datasets, Methods, and Challenges,"
IEEE Trans. Intell. Transport. Syst., vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 1341-1360, Mar.
2021.
[6] S. Zeadally, M. A. Javed, and E. B. Hamida, "Vehicular communications
for ITS: Standardization and challenges," IEEE Commun. Standards
Mag., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 11β17, Mar. 2020.
[7] H. Liu, P. Ren, S. Jain, M. Murad, M. Gruteser and F. Bai, "FusionEye:
Perception Sharing for Connected Vehicles and its Bandwidth-Accuracy
Trade-offs," IEEE Int. Conf. on Sensing, Commun., and Netw. (SECON),
Boston, USA, Jun. 2019.
[8] Q. Chen, S. Tang, Q. Yang and S. Fu, "Cooper: Cooperative Perception
for Connected Autonomous Vehicles Based on 3D Point Clouds," in
Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Distrib. Comput. Syst. (ICDCS), Dallas, USA,
Jul. 2019.
[9] H. Qiu, Huang P, Asavisanu N, X. Liu, K. Psounis, R. Govindan, "Au-
tocast: Scalable infrastructure-less cooperative perception for distributed
collaborative driving," in Proc. ACM Int. Conf. Mobile Syst., Appl., and
Services (MobiSys), Portland, USA, Jun. 2022.
[10] Q. Chen, X. Ma, S. Tang, J. Guo, Q. Yang, S. Fu, "F-cooper: Feature
based cooperative perception for autonomous vehicle edge computing
system using 3D point clouds," in Proc. ACM/IEEE Symp. Edge Comput.
(SEC), Washington DC, Nov 2019.
[11] T.-H. Wang, S. Manivasagam, M. Liang, B. Yang, W. Zeng, and R. Ur-
tasun, "V2VNet: Vehicle-to-vehicle communication for joint perception
and prediction," in Proc. Eur. Conf. Comput. Vision (ECCV), Glasgow,
United Kingdom, Aug. 2020.
[12] E. Arnold, M. Dianati, R. de Temple and S. Fallah, "Cooperative Percep-
tion for 3D Object Detection in Driving Scenarios Using Infrastructure
Sensors," IEEE Trans. Intell. Transport. Syst., vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 1852-
1864, Mar. 2022.
[13] Hu Y, Fang S, Lei Z, Y. Zhong, and S. Chen, "Where2comm:
Communication-efficient collaborative perception via spatial confidence
maps," in Proc. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. (NeurIPS), New Orleans, USA,
Nov. 2022.
[14] 5GAA Automotive Association, "Position paper on deployment
band configuration for C-V2X at 5.9 GHz in Europe", [Online].
Available: https://5gaa.org/content/uploads/2021/06/5GAA S-210019
Position-paper-on-European-deployment-band-configuration-for-C-V2X
final.pdf
[15] P Auer, N Cesa-Bianchi, P Fischer, "Finite-time analysis of the multi-
armed bandit problem," Machine Learning, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 235-256,
Dec. 2022.
[16] Y. Sun et al., "Adaptive learning-based task offloading for vehicular
edge computing systems," IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 68, no. 4, pp.
3061-3074, Apr. 2019.
[17] Y. Sun, S. Zhou, and J. Xu, "EMM: Energy-aware mobility management
for mobile edge computing in ultra dense networks," IEEE J. Sel. Areas
Commun.,, vol. 35, no. 11, pp. 2637-2646, Nov. 2017.
[18] P. Whittle, "Restless bandits: Activity allocation in a changing world,"
J. Appl. Probability, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 287-298, Mar. 1988.
[19] G. Aur Μelien, and E. Moulines, "On upper-confidence bound policies for
switching bandit problems," in Proc. Int. Conf. Algorithmic Learning
Theory (ALT), Berlin, Germany, Oct. 2011.
[20] A. Slivkins and E. Upfal, "Adapting to a changing environment: the
brownian restless bandits," in Proc. Annu. Conf. Learn. Theory (COLT),
Helsinki, Finland, Jul. 2008.
[21] P. Auer, N. Cesa-Bianchi N, Y. Freund, and R. E. Schapire, "The
nonstochastic multiarmed bandit problem," SIAM J. Comput., vol. 32,
no. 1, pp. 48-77, 2002.
14
[22] ETSI, "Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS); Vehicular Communications;
Basic Set of Applications; Analysis of the Collective Perception Ser-
vice," ETSI TR 103 562, V2.1.1, 2019.
[23] K. Garlichs, H. -J. G Μunther and L. C. Wolf, "Generation Rules for the
Collective Perception Service," in Proc. IEEE Veh. Netw. Conf. (VNC),
Los Angeles, USA, Dec. 2019.
[24] Y. Li, S. Ren, P. Wu, S. Chen, C. Feng, and W. Zhang, "Learning distilled
collaboration graph for multi-agent perception," in Advances in Neural
Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), Dec. 2021.
[25] R. Xu, H. Xiang, Z. Tu, X. Xia, M. Yang, and J. Ma, "V2X-ViT: Vehicle-
to-everything cooperative perception with vision transformer," in Proc.
Eur. Conf. Comput. Vis. (ECCV), Tel Aviv, Israel, Oct. 2022.
[26] S. Shi, J. Cui, Z. Jiang, Z. Yan, G. Xing, J. Niu, and Z. Ouyang, "VIPS:
real-time perception fusion for infrastructure-assisted autonomous driv-
ing," in Proc. Int. Conf. Mobile Comput. Netw. (MobiCom), Sydney,
Australia, Oct. 2022.
[27] H. Xu and X. Liu, "Perception synergy optimization with deep reinforce-
ment learning for cooperative perception in C-V2V scenarios," Vehicular
Communications, vol. 38, 2022.
[28] X. Zhang, A. Zhang, J. Sun, X. Zhu, Y. E. Guo, F. Qian, and Z. M.
Mao, "EMP: Edge-assisted multi-vehicle perception," in Proc. Int. Conf.
Mobile Comput. Netw. (MobiCom), New Orleans, USA, Oct. 2021.
[29] Z. Bai, G. Wu, M. J. Barth, Y. Liu, E. A. Sisbot, and K. Oguchiet,
"VINet: Lightweight, Scalable, and Heterogeneous Cooperative Percep-
tion for 3D Object Detection," [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/
2212.07060
[30] M. K. Abdel-Aziz, C. Perfecto, S. Samarakoon, M. Bennis, and W.
Saad, "Vehicular Cooperative Perception Through Action Branching and
Federated Reinforcement Learning," IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 70, no.
2, pp. 891-903, Feb. 2022.
[31] H. Du, S. Leng, K. Zhang and L. Zhou, "Cooperative sensing and task
offloading for autonomous platoons," in Proc. IEEE Global Commun.
Conf. (GLOBECOM), Taipei, China, 2020.
[32] Y. Liu, J. Tian, N. Glaser, and Z. Kira, "When2com: Multi-agent
perception via communication graph grouping," in Proc. IEEE Conf.
Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit. (CVPR), Virtual, Jun. 2020.
[33] H. Yu et al., "DAIR-V2X: A Large-Scale Dataset
for Vehicle-
Infrastructure Cooperative 3D Object Detection," in Proc. IEEE Conf.
Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit. (CVPR), New Orleans, USA, Jun. 2022.
[34] ETSI, "Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS); Vehicular Communications;
Basic Set of Applications; Part 2: Specification of Cooperative Aware-
ness Basic Service," ETSI EN 302 637-2, V1.4.1, 2019.
[35] Y. Liu, J. Tian, C. Ma, N. Glaser, C. Kuo, and Z. Kira, "Who2com:
Collaborative perception via learnable handshake communication," in
Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Robot. Autom. (ICRA), Paris, France, May 2020.
[36] R. Mao, J. Guo, Y. Jia, Y. Sun, S. Zhou, and Z. Niu, "DOLPHINS:
Dataset for Collaborative Perception enabled Harmonious and Intercon-
nected Self-driving," in Proc. Asian Conf. Comput. Vis. (ACCV), Macau
SAR, China, Dec. 2022.
[37] A. Dosovitskiy, G. Ros, F. Codevilla, A. Lopez, V. Koltun, "CARLA:
An open urban driving simulator," in Proc. Ann. Conf. Robot Learn.
(CoRL), Mountain View, USA, Nov. 2017.
[38] A. H. Lang, S. Vora, H. Caesar, L. Zhou, J. Yang, and O. Beijbom,
"Pointpillars: Fast encoders for object detection from point clouds," in
Proc. IEEE Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit. (CVPR), Long Beach,
USA, Jun. 2019.
[39] OpenPCDet Development Team, "Openpcdet: An opensource toolbox
for 3d object detection from point clouds," [Online]. Available: https:
//github.com/open-mmlab/OpenPCDet
[40] P. A. Lopez et al., "Microscopic Traffic Simulation using SUMO," in
Proc. IEEE Intell. Transport. Syst. Conf. (ITSC), Maui, USA, 2018.
[41] ETSI, "Decentralized Congestion Control Mechanisms for Intelligent
Transport Systems operating in the 5 GHz range; Access layer part,"
ETSI TS 102 687, V1.2.1, April 2018.
[42] B. McCarthy, A. O'Driscoll, "Congestion control in the cellular-V2X
sidelink," [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.04871
[43] 3GPP, "Study on evaluation methodology of new Vehicle-to-Everything
use cases for LTE and NR," 3GPP TR 37.885, v15.1.0, Sept. 2018.
[44] Y. Sun, S. Zhou, and Z. Niu, "Distributed task replication for vehicular
edge computing: Performance analysis and learning-based algorithm,"
IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 1138-1151, Feb.
2020.
[45] D. Feng, A. Harakeh, S. L. Waslander and K. Dietmayer, "A Review and
Comparative Study on Probabilistic Object Detection in Autonomous
Driving," in IEEE Trans. on Intell. Transport. Syst., vol. 23, no. 8, pp.
9961-9980, Aug. 2022.
|
|
http://arxiv.org/abs/2302.13028v1 | 2023-02-25T09:02:01 | 2023-02-25T09:02:01 | A Light-weight Deep Learning Model for Remote Sensing Image
Classification | "In this paper, we present a high-performance and light-weight deep learning\nmodel for Remote Sensi(...TRUNCATED) | [
"Lam Pham",
"Cam Le",
"Dat Ngo",
"Anh Nguyen",
"Jasmin Lampert",
"Alexander Schindler",
"Ian McLoughlin"
] | [{"@title":null,"@href":"http://arxiv.org/abs/2302.13028v1","@rel":"alternate","@type":"text/html"},(...TRUNCATED) | null | {"@xmlns:arxiv":"http://arxiv.org/schemas/atom","@term":"cs.CV","@scheme":"http://arxiv.org/schemas/(...TRUNCATED) | [
"cs.CV",
"cs.AI",
"cs.LG"
] | "3\n2\n0\n2\n\nb\ne\nF\n5\n2\n\n]\n\nV\nC\n.\ns\nc\n[\n\n1\nv\n8\n2\n0\n3\n1\n.\n2\n0\n3\n2\n:\nv\ni(...TRUNCATED) |
|
http://arxiv.org/abs/2302.13020v1 | 2023-02-25T08:16:21 | 2023-02-25T08:16:21 | DCLP: Neural Architecture Predictor with Curriculum Contrastive Learning | "Neural predictors currently show great potential in the performance\nevaluation phase of neural arc(...TRUNCATED) | [
"Shenghe Zheng",
"Hongzhi Wang",
"Tianyu Mu"
] | [{"@title":null,"@href":"http://arxiv.org/abs/2302.13020v1","@rel":"alternate","@type":"text/html"},(...TRUNCATED) | null | {"@xmlns:arxiv":"http://arxiv.org/schemas/atom","@term":"cs.LG","@scheme":"http://arxiv.org/schemas/(...TRUNCATED) | [
"cs.LG"
] | "DCLP: Neural Architecture Predictor with Curriculum Contrastive Learning\n\nShenghe Zheng1 , Hongzh(...TRUNCATED) |
|
http://arxiv.org/abs/2302.13019v1 | 2023-02-25T08:16:14 | 2023-02-25T08:16:14 | A Unified Framework for Soft Threshold Pruning | "Soft threshold pruning is among the cutting-edge pruning methods with\nstate-of-the-art performance(...TRUNCATED) | [
"Yanqi Chen",
"Zhengyu Ma",
"Wei Fang",
"Xiawu Zheng",
"Zhaofei Yu",
"Yonghong Tian"
] | [{"@title":null,"@href":"http://arxiv.org/abs/2302.13019v1","@rel":"alternate","@type":"text/html"},(...TRUNCATED) | null | {"@xmlns:arxiv":"http://arxiv.org/schemas/atom","@term":"cs.LG","@scheme":"http://arxiv.org/schemas/(...TRUNCATED) | [
"cs.LG",
"cs.AI",
"cs.CV",
"cs.NE"
] | "Published as a conference paper at ICLR 2023\n\nA UNIFIED FRAMEWORK FOR SOFT THRESHOLD\nPRUNING\n\n(...TRUNCATED) |
|
http://arxiv.org/abs/2302.13007v3 | 2023-03-20T11:39:47 | 2023-02-25T06:58:16 | AugGPT: Leveraging ChatGPT for Text Data Augmentation | "Text data augmentation is an effective strategy for overcoming the challenge\nof limited sample siz(...TRUNCATED) | ["Haixing Dai","Zhengliang Liu","Wenxiong Liao","Xiaoke Huang","Yihan Cao","Zihao Wu","Lin Zhao","Sh(...TRUNCATED) | [{"@title":null,"@href":"http://arxiv.org/abs/2302.13007v3","@rel":"alternate","@type":"text/html"},(...TRUNCATED) | null | {"@xmlns:arxiv":"http://arxiv.org/schemas/atom","@term":"cs.CL","@scheme":"http://arxiv.org/schemas/(...TRUNCATED) | [
"cs.CL",
"cs.AI",
"cs.LG"
] | "3\n2\n0\n2\n\nr\na\n\nM\n0\n2\n\n]\nL\nC\n.\ns\nc\n[\n\n3\nv\n7\n0\n0\n3\n1\n.\n2\n0\n3\n2\n:\nv\ni(...TRUNCATED) |
|
http://arxiv.org/abs/2302.13001v1 | 2023-02-25T06:26:56 | 2023-02-25T06:26:56 | Better Generative Replay for Continual Federated Learning | "Federated learning is a technique that enables a centralized server to learn\nfrom distributed clie(...TRUNCATED) | [
"Daiqing Qi",
"Handong Zhao",
"Sheng Li"
] | [{"@title":null,"@href":"http://arxiv.org/abs/2302.13001v1","@rel":"alternate","@type":"text/html"},(...TRUNCATED) | null | {"@xmlns:arxiv":"http://arxiv.org/schemas/atom","@term":"cs.LG","@scheme":"http://arxiv.org/schemas/(...TRUNCATED) | [
"cs.LG",
"cs.AI"
] | "3\n2\n0\n2\n\nb\ne\nF\n5\n2\n\n]\n\nG\nL\n.\ns\nc\n[\n\n1\nv\n1\n0\n0\n3\n1\n.\n2\n0\n3\n2\n:\nv\ni(...TRUNCATED) |
|
http://arxiv.org/abs/2302.13000v2 | 2023-08-26T06:20:33 | 2023-02-25T06:23:45 | Inaccurate Label Distribution Learning | "Label distribution learning (LDL) trains a model to predict the relevance of\na set of labels (call(...TRUNCATED) | [
"Zhiqiang Kou",
"Yuheng Jia",
"Jing Wang",
"Xin Geng"
] | [{"@title":null,"@href":"http://arxiv.org/abs/2302.13000v2","@rel":"alternate","@type":"text/html"},(...TRUNCATED) | null | {"@xmlns:arxiv":"http://arxiv.org/schemas/atom","@term":"cs.LG","@scheme":"http://arxiv.org/schemas/(...TRUNCATED) | [
"cs.LG"
] | "JOURNAL OF IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, VOL. 00, NO. 0, MONTH 2020\n\n1\n\nInaccur(...TRUNCATED) |
|
http://arxiv.org/abs/2302.12991v1 | 2023-02-25T05:05:59 | 2023-02-25T05:05:59 | Generalization Bounds for Set-to-Set Matching with Negative Sampling | "The problem of matching two sets of multiple elements, namely set-to-set\nmatching, has received a (...TRUNCATED) | [
"Masanari Kimura"
] | [{"@title":null,"@href":"http://arxiv.org/abs/2302.12991v1","@rel":"alternate","@type":"text/html"},(...TRUNCATED) | null | {"@xmlns:arxiv":"http://arxiv.org/schemas/atom","@term":"stat.ML","@scheme":"http://arxiv.org/schema(...TRUNCATED) | [
"stat.ML",
"cs.LG"
] | "3\n2\n0\n2\n\nb\ne\nF\n5\n2\n\n]\nL\nM\n\n.\nt\na\nt\ns\n[\n\n1\nv\n1\n9\n9\n2\n1\n.\n2\n0\n3\n2\n:(...TRUNCATED) |
End of preview. Expand
in Dataset Viewer.
- Downloads last month
- 43