Create eval_basics.md
Browse files- posts/eval_basics.md +111 -0
posts/eval_basics.md
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,111 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
# Evaluating Anime Models Systematically - Basics
|
2 |
+
|
3 |
+
I was trying to refine my character models when I realized how I've been making models is really inefficient.
|
4 |
+
It typically goes like, tweak some configs or data, try some random prompts, see if they look okay.
|
5 |
+
It should be helpful to establish a well-defined procedure.
|
6 |
+
Then it's apparent that to evaluate fine-tuned models, knowing and quantifying how the base models perform as a baseline is essential.
|
7 |
+
So here I am, trying to evaluate base models.
|
8 |
+
|
9 |
+
I collected 1000 random prompts from Danbooru posts from 2021-2022 with the query `chartags:0 -is:child -rating:e,q order:random score:>=10 filetype:jpg,png,webp ratio:0.45..2.1`
|
10 |
+
and generated 1000 640x640 images with them for each of 3 widely-used anime models:
|
11 |
+
[animefull-latest](https://huggingface.co/deepghs/animefull-latest),
|
12 |
+
[Counterfeit-V3.0](https://civitai.com/models/4468?modelVersionId=57618), [MeinaMix_V11](https://huggingface.co/Meina/MeinaMix_V11).
|
13 |
+
|
14 |
+
|
15 |
+
A model can be evaluated over a number of aspects: fidelity, text-image alignment, aesthetics, diversity. Let's go through them one by one.
|
16 |
+
|
17 |
+
## Fidelity
|
18 |
+
|
19 |
+
Generated images should be indistinguishable from real ones. They should make sense and not contain obvious errors such as extra limbs, mutated fingers, glitches or random blobs.
|
20 |
+
In literature, it's common to use metrics based on distribution distance, such as FID and IS. I calculated the KID score of the 3 sets of images against the 1000 real images.
|
21 |
+
|
22 |
+
| model | KID (lower better) |
|
23 |
+
|---|--|
|
24 |
+
| animefull-latest | 0.01192 |
|
25 |
+
| Counterfeit-V3.0 | 0.01807 |
|
26 |
+
| MeinaMix_V11 | 0.01345 |
|
27 |
+
|
28 |
+
It seems like that KID does not align with human evaluation, which would generally rate animefull-latest as the worst one.
|
29 |
+
This is kind of expected, since models with strong style would have a different image feature distribution than random real images.
|
30 |
+
|
31 |
+
I also tried multimodal LLMs, including GPT-4V and LLaVA, and unfortunately find them quite useless. GPT-4V is supposedly SOTA, but it's clear that it quite useless at spotting generation errors.
|
32 |
+
|
33 |
+
|
34 |
+
![image/png](https://cdn-uploads.huggingface.co/production/uploads/63e3c06a99a032b1c95226a9/bAtPwnb0TMrKZrneQbxvi.png)
|
35 |
+
|
36 |
+
|
37 |
+
![image/png](https://cdn-uploads.huggingface.co/production/uploads/63e3c06a99a032b1c95226a9/mPrbphtOxfNtK1ClhEgGV.png)
|
38 |
+
|
39 |
+
So currently I can't find a process that computes a fidelity score for anime models. Have to wait for someone to train a specialized model for now.
|
40 |
+
|
41 |
+
|
42 |
+
## Text-Image Alignment
|
43 |
+
|
44 |
+
Generated images should not contradict the text prompts. A popular metric is the CLIP score, which is the cosine similarity of the projected CLIP embeddings.
|
45 |
+
There's also [PickScore_v1](https://huggingface.co/yuvalkirstain/PickScore_v1) which is fine-tuned on human preference data.
|
46 |
+
These are not well-suited for anime models due to how different Booru tagging is from regular images.
|
47 |
+
|
48 |
+
Model using booru-tag prompts can be evaluated with a tagger. Specifically, I used [wd-v1-4-moat-tagger-v2](https://huggingface.co/SmilingWolf/wd-v1-4-moat-tagger-v2) with a threshold of 0.35.
|
49 |
+
A tag accuracy score can be defined as `#{prompted tags correctly reproduced}/#{prompted tags}`. The accuracy is macro-averaged over all images. Here are the scores:
|
50 |
+
|
51 |
+
| model | tag accuracy (higher better) |
|
52 |
+
|---|--|
|
53 |
+
| animefull-latest | 0.464328 |
|
54 |
+
| Counterfeit-V3.0 | 0.434574 |
|
55 |
+
| MeinaMix_V11 | 0.375389 |
|
56 |
+
|
57 |
+
It can be seen that fine-tunes or merges may produce nicer images but at the cost of controllability.
|
58 |
+
|
59 |
+
## Aesthetics
|
60 |
+
|
61 |
+
Images should be pretty. While this is generally subjective, there are models that give an aesthetic score, either averaged from many people's preferences or personalized.
|
62 |
+
There are CLIP based models ([aesthetic-predictor](https://github.com/LAION-AI/aesthetic-predictor), [improved-aesthetic-predictor](https://github.com/christophschuhmann/improved-aesthetic-predictor))
|
63 |
+
and some custom models ([anime-aesthetic](https://huggingface.co/spaces/skytnt/anime-aesthetic-predict), [cafe_aesthetic](https://huggingface.co/cafeai/cafe_aesthetic)).
|
64 |
+
|
65 |
+
I tested averaged improved-aesthetic-predictor and anime-aesthetic:
|
66 |
+
|
67 |
+
| model | improved-aesthetic-predictor (higher better) | anime-aesthetic (higher better) |
|
68 |
+
|---|--|-|
|
69 |
+
| animefull-latest | 6.124954 | 0.639767 |
|
70 |
+
| Counterfeit-V3.0 | 6.359464 | 0.789190 |
|
71 |
+
| MeinaMix_V11 | 6.474662 | 0.829989 |
|
72 |
+
|
73 |
+
The two scores appears to agree.
|
74 |
+
|
75 |
+
Interestingly, GPT-4V does a reasonable job at this.
|
76 |
+
![image/png](https://cdn-uploads.huggingface.co/production/uploads/63e3c06a99a032b1c95226a9/vhk-IS0rZl1urd5Mqlzi9.png)
|
77 |
+
|
78 |
+
## Diversity
|
79 |
+
|
80 |
+
Even with the same prompt, given different random seeds, generated images should not be repetitive.
|
81 |
+
There's this DIV score defined in the [Dreambooth paper](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2208.12242.pdf), which calculates image similarity with LPIPS.
|
82 |
+
For this particular set of images, this metric is not applicable, and I will leave it to a future update.
|
83 |
+
|
84 |
+
## Conclusions
|
85 |
+
|
86 |
+
It's possible to programmatically generate some numbers given a base model. We can use the numbers as a proxy of the model's overall performance.
|
87 |
+
|
88 |
+
|
89 |
+
## Miscellaneous notes
|
90 |
+
|
91 |
+
I used diffusers and 13 images from animefull-latest came out as solid black images for unknown reasons even with the safety checker disabled and single precision VAE.
|
92 |
+
These images and their counterparts were excluded in metrics calculation.
|
93 |
+
|
94 |
+
The images and prompts can be found [here](https://huggingface.co/datasets/gustproof/sd-data/tree/main/db1k).
|
95 |
+
|
96 |
+
It's possible that some models perform better with special configs, but for simplicity I kept them the same.
|
97 |
+
|
98 |
+
The code for image generation and metrics is quite messy so I'm will not upload it right now, but feel free to ask questions or give suggestions.
|
99 |
+
|
100 |
+
I probably would create a fidelity model eventually if no one does, but it will take a while.
|
101 |
+
|
102 |
+
|
103 |
+
|
104 |
+
Prompts with more tags have lower tag accuracy
|
105 |
+
![image/png](https://cdn-uploads.huggingface.co/production/uploads/63e3c06a99a032b1c95226a9/-CCWbnriWllqZKa5Le36M.png)
|
106 |
+
|
107 |
+
The affect of tag position is measurable albeit less pronounced. The trend at the pos 20-25 may be due to the 77-token limit wraparound.
|
108 |
+
![image/png](https://cdn-uploads.huggingface.co/production/uploads/63e3c06a99a032b1c95226a9/b0t53PqMR2oNQX23ZTw5h.png)
|
109 |
+
|
110 |
+
The next post will be about evaluating character models.
|
111 |
+
|