|
[ |
|
{ |
|
"Name": "learning_rate_schedule", |
|
"Title": "Adaptive Learning Rate Schedules: Comparing different learning rate schedules for diffusion models.", |
|
"Experiment": "In this experiment, we compare the performance of different learning rate schedules on diffusion model performance. We use the final estimated KL as the evaluation metric.", |
|
"Interestingness": 4, |
|
"Feasibility": 10, |
|
"Novelty": 3, |
|
"novel": true |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"Name": "hybrid_embedding", |
|
"Title": "Exploring Hybrid Embedding Methods for Improved Diffusion Model Performance", |
|
"Experiment": "Implement a hybrid embedding method that combines sinusoidal and Fourier features. Retrain the model and evaluate performance using estimated KL divergence.", |
|
"Interestingness": 8, |
|
"Feasibility": 8, |
|
"Novelty": 7, |
|
"novel": true |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"Name": "region_specific_diffusion", |
|
"Title": "Region-Specific Diffusion Models: Controlling Generation to Target Specific Regions", |
|
"Experiment": "Modify the existing code to incorporate a region-specific conditioning mechanism. Define regions using a simple approach (e.g. quadrants or clustering). Train a single diffusion model with region-specific conditioning and evaluate performance using estimated KL divergence and visual inspection.", |
|
"Interestingness": 9, |
|
"Feasibility": 9, |
|
"Novelty": 8, |
|
"novel": false |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"Name": "mode_specific_diffusion", |
|
"Title": "Mode-Specific Diffusion Models: Unsupervised Mode Discovery and Generation", |
|
"Experiment": "Modify the existing code to incorporate a mode-specific latent variable that is learned during training. Evaluate performance using estimated KL divergence, mode coverage, and mode-specific sample quality.", |
|
"Interestingness": 9, |
|
"Feasibility": 8, |
|
"Novelty": 9, |
|
"novel": true |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"Name": "resolution_conditioned_diffusion", |
|
"Title": "Resolution-Conditioned Diffusion Models: Generating Samples at Different Resolutions", |
|
"Experiment": "Modify the existing code to include a resolution-dependent conditioning mechanism, allowing the model to generate samples at different resolutions based on a given conditioning signal. Evaluate performance using estimated KL divergence, visual inspection, and comparison with the original model.", |
|
"Interestingness": 8, |
|
"Feasibility": 8, |
|
"Novelty": 8, |
|
"novel": true |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"Name": "geometric_constraints", |
|
"Title": "Geometric Constraints for Diffusion Models: Improving Sample Quality", |
|
"Experiment": "Modify the existing code to incorporate geometric constraints as additional loss terms or regularization penalties. Focus on the circle dataset and impose a constraint that encourages the model to generate samples within a certain radius. Evaluate performance using estimated KL divergence, precision, and recall.", |
|
"Interestingness": 8, |
|
"Feasibility": 8, |
|
"Novelty": 7, |
|
"novel": true |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"Name": "targeted_diffusion_model_pruning", |
|
"Title": "Targeted Diffusion Model Pruning: Simplifying Specific Components for Efficient Generation", |
|
"Experiment": "Implement targeted pruning of specific components of the diffusion model (e.g. sinusoidal embedding layers or residual blocks). Explore different pruning methods, such as reinforcement learning or evolutionary algorithms, to search for the optimal pruning strategy. Evaluate the pruned model's performance using estimated KL divergence and visual inspection.", |
|
"Interestingness": 8, |
|
"Feasibility": 7, |
|
"Novelty": 7, |
|
"novel": false |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"Name": "noise_schedule_adaptation", |
|
"Title": "Adaptive Noise Schedule for Improved Sample Diversity", |
|
"Experiment": "Introduce a novel noise schedule adaptation mechanism that dynamically adjusts the noise schedule based on the model's performance on a validation set. Implement a simple heuristic-based adaptation mechanism and evaluate its effectiveness using sample diversity metrics and reconstruction loss.", |
|
"Interestingness": 8, |
|
"Feasibility": 9, |
|
"Novelty": 8, |
|
"novel": true |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"Name": "dataset_agnostic_diffusion", |
|
"Title": "Dataset-Agnostic Diffusion Models: Adapting to New Datasets through Fine-Tuning", |
|
"Experiment": "Train a single diffusion model on a single dataset. Fine-tune the model on a small number of other datasets to demonstrate its ability to generalize. Evaluate the model's performance on each dataset using estimated KL divergence and visual inspection.", |
|
"Interestingness": 8, |
|
"Feasibility": 9, |
|
"Novelty": 8, |
|
"novel": true |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"Name": "diffusion_trajectory_control", |
|
"Title": "Diffusion Trajectory Control in Diffusion Models: Improving Sample Quality and Diversity", |
|
"Experiment": "Modify the existing code to include a diffusion trajectory control mechanism, which allows for control over the trajectory of the diffusion process. Evaluate the effectiveness of the approach using metrics such as sample quality, diversity, trajectory similarity, and control accuracy.", |
|
"Interestingness": 9, |
|
"Feasibility": 8, |
|
"Novelty": 8, |
|
"novel": true |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"Name": "diffusion_mode_fingerprinting", |
|
"Title": "Diffusion Mode Fingerprinting: Analyzing the Mode Coverage of Diffusion Models", |
|
"Experiment": "Train multiple diffusion models on the same dataset with different hyperparameters or architectures. Analyze the mode coverage of each model using a metric such as the number of modes captured or the proportion of samples in each mode. Use these results to create a 'fingerprint' that summarizes the strengths and weaknesses of each model.", |
|
"Interestingness": 8, |
|
"Feasibility": 9, |
|
"Novelty": 8, |
|
"novel": false |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"Name": "mode_transition", |
|
"Title": "Evaluating Mode Transition in Diffusion Models", |
|
"Experiment": "Modify the existing code to generate samples that transition between two specific modes. Evaluate the quality of these samples using existing metrics such as FID or IS. Compare the performance with a baseline model that does not have any mode connectivity mechanisms.", |
|
"Interestingness": 9, |
|
"Feasibility": 8, |
|
"Novelty": 8, |
|
"novel": true |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"Name": "efficient_learnable_noise_schedule", |
|
"Title": "Efficient Learnable Noise Schedules for Diffusion Models: Improving Sample Quality and Diversity", |
|
"Experiment": "Modify the existing code to include a simple, lightweight learnable noise schedule module that can be efficiently trained using a meta-learning approach. Evaluate the module's effectiveness using a variety of metrics, such as sample quality, diversity, and mode coverage.", |
|
"Interestingness": 9, |
|
"Feasibility": 8, |
|
"Novelty": 9, |
|
"novel": true |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"Name": "quantile_calibration_diffusion", |
|
"Title": "Quantile Calibration for Diffusion Models", |
|
"Experiment": "Implement quantile calibration for diffusion models using a pre-existing calibration library or framework. Evaluate the effectiveness of the calibration method using metrics such as calibration error, statistical consistency, and mode coverage.", |
|
"Interestingness": 8, |
|
"Feasibility": 9, |
|
"Novelty": 7, |
|
"novel": true |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"Name": "diffusion_experts", |
|
"Title": "Diffusion Experts: A Single Model with Multiple Specialists for Improved Mode Coverage", |
|
"Experiment": "Implement a single diffusion model with multiple 'experts' that specialize in different aspects of the data distribution. Use a gating mechanism to select the most relevant expert for each input. Evaluate performance using estimated KL divergence, mode coverage, and visual inspection.", |
|
"Interestingness": 9, |
|
"Feasibility": 9, |
|
"Novelty": 8, |
|
"novel": false |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"Name": "mode_signatures", |
|
"Title": "Mode Signatures: Characterizing the Unique Behaviors of Diffusion Models", |
|
"Experiment": "Train multiple diffusion models on the same dataset and evaluate their generated samples using a combination of metrics such as mode coverage, sample quality, diversity, and other metrics that capture the unique characteristics of each model. Identify specific 'mode signatures' that are characteristic of each model.", |
|
"Interestingness": 8, |
|
"Feasibility": 8, |
|
"Novelty": 8, |
|
"novel": true |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"Name": "diffusion_model_ensembling", |
|
"Title": "Diffusion Model Ensembling: Combining Pre-Trained Models with Different Hyperparameters", |
|
"Experiment": "Fine-tune two pre-trained diffusion models with the same architecture but different hyperparameters on the target dataset. Implement a simple combination mechanism, such as averaging, to produce a single ensemble output. Evaluate the ensemble's performance using estimated KL divergence, sample quality, diversity, mode coverage, and metrics that assess the ensemble's ability to combine the strengths of individual models.", |
|
"Interestingness": 8, |
|
"Feasibility": 9, |
|
"Novelty": 8, |
|
"novel": false |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"Name": "diffusion_confidence", |
|
"Title": "Diffusion Model Confidence: Predicting Sample Quality with Confidence Scores", |
|
"Experiment": "Modify the existing code to incorporate a secondary neural network that takes the diffusion model's internal states as input and predicts a confidence score for the generated sample. Train the secondary network using a combination of the diffusion model's losses and an additional confidence loss. Evaluate the effectiveness of the approach using metrics such as sample quality, diversity, and confidence accuracy.", |
|
"Interestingness": 9, |
|
"Feasibility": 8, |
|
"Novelty": 9, |
|
"novel": true |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"Name": "graph_aware_diffusion", |
|
"Title": "Graph-Aware Diffusion Models: Regularizing Generative Models with Graph-Based Methods", |
|
"Experiment": "Construct a graph representing the relationships between the data points, detect communities in the graph, and add a community-based loss term to the model's objective function to regularize the training process.", |
|
"Interestingness": 8, |
|
"Feasibility": 9, |
|
"Novelty": 8, |
|
"novel": true |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"Name": "diffusion_internal_analysis", |
|
"Title": "Diffusion Model Internal Analysis: Uncovering Biases through Embedding Space Exploration", |
|
"Experiment": "Analyze the internal states of the diffusion model, such as embedding spaces or attention weights, to identify patterns or biases. Use dimensionality reduction techniques or visualization tools to facilitate the analysis.", |
|
"Interestingness": 8, |
|
"Feasibility": 9, |
|
"Novelty": 8, |
|
"novel": false |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"Name": "temporal_conditioning", |
|
"Title": "Temporal Conditioning in Diffusion Models: Controlling Generation with Temporal Context", |
|
"Experiment": "Modify the existing code to condition the diffusion process on a fixed sequence of timesteps or a simple temporal schedule. Evaluate the effectiveness of temporal conditioning using metrics such as sample coherence and realism. Analyze the internal states of the model to gain insights into the temporal conditioning mechanism.", |
|
"Interestingness": 9, |
|
"Feasibility": 8, |
|
"Novelty": 9, |
|
"novel": false |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"Name": "diffusion_bottlenecks", |
|
"Title": "Diffusion Pathway Bottlenecks: Identifying and Debottlenecking Critical Points in Noise Schedules", |
|
"Experiment": "Modify the existing code to track and analyze the noise schedules used during training and inference. Identify specific points in the noise schedule where the model's performance is significantly affected, and explore ways to adjust the noise schedule at these points to improve model performance and efficiency.", |
|
"Interestingness": 9, |
|
"Feasibility": 8, |
|
"Novelty": 9, |
|
"novel": false |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"Name": "mode_transitioning_loss", |
|
"Title": "Improving Mode Transitioning in Diffusion Models through Loss Function Design", |
|
"Experiment": "Modify the existing code to include a mode transitioning loss term. Evaluate the effectiveness of this approach using metrics such as sample quality, diversity, and mode coverage, as well as visual inspection.", |
|
"Interestingness": 9, |
|
"Feasibility": 8, |
|
"Novelty": 9, |
|
"novel": true |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"Name": "diffusion_model_analysis", |
|
"Title": "Diffusion Model Analysis: Leveraging Evaluation Metrics and Visualization Tools", |
|
"Experiment": "Use existing evaluation metrics, such as reconstruction loss or KL divergence, to analyze the internal states of the diffusion model. Utilize visualization tools, such as dimensionality reduction techniques or heatmap visualizations, to facilitate the analysis and interpretation of the results.", |
|
"Interestingness": 8, |
|
"Feasibility": 9, |
|
"Novelty": 8, |
|
"novel": false |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"Name": "symmetry_invariant_loss", |
|
"Title": "Symmetry-Invariant Loss Functions for Regularizing Diffusion Models", |
|
"Experiment": "Modify the existing code to incorporate rotational symmetry-invariant mean squared error as a loss function. Investigate the impact of this loss function on the quality of generated samples and the number of required training steps.", |
|
"Interestingness": 8, |
|
"Feasibility": 8, |
|
"Novelty": 8, |
|
"novel": true |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"Name": "dataset_distribution_fingerprinting", |
|
"Title": "Dataset Distribution Fingerprinting using Diffusion Models", |
|
"Experiment": "Train a single diffusion model on multiple 2D datasets and analyze the distribution of generated samples in different regions of the data space using techniques such as density estimation or clustering.", |
|
"Interestingness": 9, |
|
"Feasibility": 8, |
|
"Novelty": 9, |
|
"novel": true |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"Name": "diffusion_perturbations", |
|
"Title": "Diffusion Perturbations: Targeted Modifications to the Noise Schedule for Improved Performance and Control", |
|
"Experiment": "Introduce a new 'perturbation' mechanism that allows for targeted modifications to the noise schedule. Design the mechanism to be flexible and controllable, allowing users to specify the type and extent of the modifications. Incorporate a learning component that allows the model to adapt to the modifications through fine-tuning or a new loss function. Evaluate the effectiveness of this approach using metrics such as sample quality, diversity, and mode coverage.", |
|
"Interestingness": 9, |
|
"Feasibility": 8, |
|
"Novelty": 8, |
|
"novel": true |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"Name": "diffusion_trajectory_event_segmentation", |
|
"Title": "Diffusion Trajectory Event Segmentation: Uncovering Key Milestones in the Diffusion Process", |
|
"Experiment": "Modify the existing code to include a segmentation mechanism that divides the diffusion process into segments based on specific events or milestones, such as mode transitions or significant changes in noise levels. Analyze the characteristics of each segment using metrics such as sample quality, mode coverage, and noise levels.", |
|
"Interestingness": 8, |
|
"Feasibility": 7, |
|
"Novelty": 9, |
|
"novel": false |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"Name": "noise_schedule_signatures", |
|
"Title": "Noise Schedule Signatures: Unique Patterns in Diffusion Processes", |
|
"Experiment": "Analyze the noise schedules used during training and inference for 2-3 datasets. Identify unique patterns or structures in the noise schedules that can be used to create a signature for each dataset. Compare and contrast the signatures across datasets to evaluate their effectiveness.", |
|
"Interestingness": 9, |
|
"Feasibility": 8, |
|
"Novelty": 9, |
|
"novel": true |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"Name": "diffusion_model_introspection", |
|
"Title": "Diffusion Model Introspection: Enabling Self-Awareness in Generative Models", |
|
"Experiment": "Modify the existing model to output additional information about its internal states and generation process. Define a clear evaluation metric to measure the success of the introspection mechanism, such as the accuracy of predicting sample quality or mode coverage.", |
|
"Interestingness": 9, |
|
"Feasibility": 7, |
|
"Novelty": 8, |
|
"novel": false |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"Name": "task_agnostic_diffusion", |
|
"Title": "Task-Agnostic Diffusion Models: Adapting to New Tasks with Minimal Training Data", |
|
"Experiment": "Train a diffusion model on a single task and then fine-tune it for other related tasks with minimal additional training data. Evaluate the model's performance using metrics that assess its adaptability across different tasks and datasets.", |
|
"Interestingness": 8, |
|
"Feasibility": 8, |
|
"Novelty": 8, |
|
"novel": false |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"Name": "diffusion_ensembles", |
|
"Title": "Diffusion Ensembles: Combining Multiple Models for Improved Generative Performance", |
|
"Experiment": "Train multiple diffusion models independently and then combine their outputs to produce a single ensemble output. Evaluate the performance of the ensemble using metrics such as sample quality, diversity, and mode coverage. Compare the results to a single diffusion model to determine the benefits of the ensemble approach.", |
|
"Interestingness": 8, |
|
"Feasibility": 9, |
|
"Novelty": 8, |
|
"novel": true |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"Name": "noise_schedule_symmetry", |
|
"Title": "Noise Schedule Symmetry: Understanding its Effects on Diffusion Processes", |
|
"Experiment": "Modify the existing code to accommodate symmetric and asymmetric noise schedules and evaluate their effects on the generated samples. Investigate how noise schedule symmetry affects the convergence of the diffusion process and the quality of the generated samples.", |
|
"Interestingness": 9, |
|
"Feasibility": 8, |
|
"Novelty": 8, |
|
"novel": true |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"Name": "diffusion_model_temporal_adaptation", |
|
"Title": "Investigating Diffusion Model Temporal Adaptation: Adapting to Changes in Data Distribution over Time", |
|
"Experiment": "Train a diffusion model on a dataset and then fine-tune it on a new dataset that reflects simulated changes in the data distribution over time. The fine-tuning process will involve re-training the final layer of the pre-trained model on the new dataset, while keeping the rest of the model frozen. Evaluate the performance of the fine-tuned model using metrics such as sample quality, diversity, mode coverage, precision, recall, and F1 score.", |
|
"Interestingness": 9, |
|
"Feasibility": 8, |
|
"Novelty": 9, |
|
"novel": true |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"Name": "adaptive_noise_schedule", |
|
"Title": "Adaptive Noise Schedules for Improved Diffusion Model Performance", |
|
"Experiment": "Modify the NoiseScheduler class to adapt the noise schedule based on the model's performance during training. Introduce a feedback mechanism to adjust the noise schedule in response to changes in the model's performance.", |
|
"Interestingness": 8, |
|
"Feasibility": 8, |
|
"Novelty": 7, |
|
"novel": false |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"Name": "diffusion_model_robustness_to_additive_noise", |
|
"Title": "Diffusion Model Robustness to Additive Noise: Evaluating and Improving Model Performance", |
|
"Experiment": "Modify the NoiseScheduler class to introduce additive noise to the noise schedule during training. Evaluate the model's response using a combination of quantitative metrics (e.g. sample quality, diversity) and qualitative metrics (e.g. visual inspection). Explore the use of adversarial training methods to improve the model's robustness to additive noise.", |
|
"Interestingness": 9, |
|
"Feasibility": 8, |
|
"Novelty": 9, |
|
"novel": false |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"Name": "diversity_regularized_loss", |
|
"Title": "Diversity-Regularized Loss Function for Encouraging Sample Diversity", |
|
"Experiment": "Modify the loss function to include a term that rewards the model for generating diverse samples, using pairwise distance as the diversity metric. Train the model on a single dataset and evaluate the resulting samples using metrics such as sample quality, diversity, and mode coverage.", |
|
"Interestingness": 9, |
|
"Feasibility": 8, |
|
"Novelty": 8, |
|
"novel": false |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"Name": "noise_schedule_interpolation", |
|
"Title": "Noise Schedule Interpolation for Improved Sample Diversity", |
|
"Experiment": "Modify the NoiseScheduler class to allow for interpolation between different noise schedules. Add a new function that takes in two noise schedules and a interpolation parameter, and returns a new noise schedule that is the interpolation of the two input noise schedules. Evaluate the effectiveness of the noise schedule interpolation using the Inception Score (IS) metric, focusing on the effect of interpolation on sample diversity. Incorporate the noise schedule interpolation into the training loop and add a new hyperparameter to control the interpolation parameter.", |
|
"Interestingness": 9, |
|
"Feasibility": 8, |
|
"Novelty": 9, |
|
"novel": true |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"Name": "curriculum_diffusion", |
|
"Title": "Curriculum Learning for Diffusion Models: A Simple Approach to Difficulty-Aware Training", |
|
"Experiment": "Implement a curriculum learning strategy for diffusion models, where the model is trained on a sequence of increasingly difficult tasks. Use the reconstruction loss as a proxy for difficulty, and dynamically adjust the curriculum based on the model's performance and learning pace. Evaluate the model's performance using metrics such as sample quality, diversity, and mode coverage.", |
|
"Interestingness": 8, |
|
"Feasibility": 9, |
|
"Novelty": 8, |
|
"novel": false |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"Name": "diffusion_model_masking", |
|
"Title": "Diffusion Model Masking: A Novel Approach to Generating Diverse and Novel Samples", |
|
"Experiment": "Modify the existing code to incorporate a masking mechanism, such as a spatial dropout layer, to selectively mask out certain dimensions of the input data during training. Introduce a new loss function that rewards the model for generating samples that are diverse and novel in the unmasked dimensions. Evaluate the effectiveness of the masking mechanism using a diversity score, such as pairwise distance between generated samples.", |
|
"Interestingness": 9, |
|
"Feasibility": 8, |
|
"Novelty": 8, |
|
"novel": true |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"Name": "noise_schedule_correlations", |
|
"Title": "Uncovering Correlations between Noise Schedules and Generated Samples", |
|
"Experiment": "Modify the NoiseScheduler class to track and analyze noise schedules during training and inference. Compute sample quality for each noise schedule. Analyze correlations between sample quality and noise schedule patterns using techniques such as Pearson correlation or mutual information.", |
|
"Interestingness": 9, |
|
"Feasibility": 8, |
|
"Novelty": 9, |
|
"novel": true |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"Name": "diffusion_fingerprints", |
|
"Title": "Diffusion Fingerprints: Extracting Unique Patterns from Noise Schedules and Model Internal States", |
|
"Experiment": "Modify the NoiseScheduler class to track and analyze noise schedules during training and inference. Extract embedding space information from the model. Use dimensionality reduction and clustering techniques to analyze the combined data and create a diffusion fingerprint for each dataset and model. Evaluate the accuracy of predicting the dataset and model used to generate a given sample using the diffusion fingerprints.", |
|
"Interestingness": 9, |
|
"Feasibility": 8, |
|
"Novelty": 9, |
|
"novel": false |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"Name": "diffusion_model_forgetting", |
|
"Title": "Diffusion Model Forgetting: A Novel Approach to Controllable and Diverse Generation", |
|
"Experiment": "Modify the existing code to include a variant of the dropout technique, where certain dimensions of the embedding space are randomly masked out during training. Evaluate the effectiveness of this approach using metrics such as sample quality, diversity, novelty, and adaptability to new data distributions.", |
|
"Interestingness": 9, |
|
"Feasibility": 8, |
|
"Novelty": 9, |
|
"novel": false |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"Name": "diffusion_trajectory_quality", |
|
"Title": "Diffusion Trajectory Analysis: Identifying Patterns in Noise Schedules for High-Quality Samples", |
|
"Experiment": "Analyze the noise schedules used to generate high-quality samples versus low-quality samples, and identify any patterns or differences between the two. Use visualization techniques to illustrate the results, such as plotting the noise schedules for each sample or using dimensionality reduction to visualize the trajectories.", |
|
"Interestingness": 9, |
|
"Feasibility": 8, |
|
"Novelty": 9, |
|
"novel": true |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"Name": "dataset_fingerprinting", |
|
"Title": "Dataset Fingerprinting in Diffusion Models: A Simple Approach to Dataset Identification", |
|
"Experiment": "Modify the existing loss function to include a dataset identification term that rewards the model for generating samples that retain a unique signature or fingerprint of the training dataset. Evaluate the model's ability to learn a dataset fingerprint and its performance on dataset identification tasks using accuracy as the evaluation metric.", |
|
"Interestingness": 9, |
|
"Feasibility": 9, |
|
"Novelty": 9, |
|
"novel": true |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"Name": "diffusion_confidence_estimation", |
|
"Title": "Confidence Estimation in Diffusion Models: A Comparative Study", |
|
"Experiment": "Implement and compare various confidence estimation techniques, such as Monte Carlo dropout, Bayesian neural networks, ensembling, and uncertainty thresholding, in the context of diffusion models.", |
|
"Interestingness": 8, |
|
"Feasibility": 8, |
|
"Novelty": 7, |
|
"novel": true |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"Name": "noise_schedule_perturbation", |
|
"Title": "Perturbing the Noise Schedule: Analyzing the Model's Response to Changes in the Input", |
|
"Experiment": "Modify the existing code to include a new function that randomly perturbs the input noise schedule during training. Analyze how the model's output changes in response to changes in the input noise schedule.", |
|
"Interestingness": 8, |
|
"Feasibility": 9, |
|
"Novelty": 8, |
|
"novel": false |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"Name": "noise_schedule_chunking", |
|
"Title": "Noise Schedule Chunking: Learning to Focus on Relevant Noise Schedule Chunks", |
|
"Experiment": "Modify the existing code to include a learnable mask that selects the most relevant chunks of the noise schedule for each dataset. Use this masked noise schedule to compute the loss function. Evaluate the model's performance on multiple datasets using metrics such as sample quality, diversity, and mode coverage.", |
|
"Interestingness": 9, |
|
"Feasibility": 8, |
|
"Novelty": 8, |
|
"novel": true |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"Name": "continuity_loss", |
|
"Title": "Continuity Loss in Diffusion Models: Improving Temporal Coherence", |
|
"Experiment": "Modify the existing code to include a continuity loss function that penalizes the model for generating samples that are drastically different from the previous sample. Experiment with different weighting schemes and architectures (e.g. RNNs, transformers) to enhance temporal coherence.", |
|
"Interestingness": 9, |
|
"Feasibility": 8, |
|
"Novelty": 8, |
|
"novel": false |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"Name": "noise_schedule_analysis", |
|
"Title": "Uncovering the Relationship between Noise Schedules, Generated Samples, and Mode Coverage in Diffusion Models", |
|
"Experiment": "Modify the existing code to track and analyze the noise schedules, generated samples, and mode coverage during training and inference. Use dimensionality reduction and visualization techniques to identify patterns and correlations between the noise schedules, generated samples, and mode coverage.", |
|
"Interestingness": 9, |
|
"Feasibility": 8, |
|
"Novelty": 8, |
|
"novel": true |
|
}, |
|
{ |
|
"Name": "pretrained_noise_schedule_fine_tuning", |
|
"Title": "Fine-Tuning Pre-Trained Models with Adaptive Noise Schedules for Fast Adaptation to New Datasets", |
|
"Experiment": "Fine-tune a pre-trained model on a new dataset, using the pre-trained model's noise schedule as a starting point. Compare the performance of the fine-tuned model with a model trained from scratch and explore the impact of adapting the noise schedule on the performance of the fine-tuned model.", |
|
"Interestingness": 9, |
|
"Feasibility": 9, |
|
"Novelty": 8, |
|
"novel": true |
|
} |
|
] |