File size: 12,734 Bytes
57bdca5 |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 |
Optimize inference using torch.compile()
This guide aims to provide a benchmark on the inference speed-ups introduced with torch.compile() for computer vision models in 🤗 Transformers.
Benefits of torch.compile
Depending on the model and the GPU, torch.compile() yields up to 30% speed-up during inference. To use torch.compile(), simply install any version of torch above 2.0.
Compiling a model takes time, so it's useful if you are compiling the model only once instead of every time you infer.
To compile any computer vision model of your choice, call torch.compile() on the model as shown below:
from transformers import AutoModelForImageClassification
model = AutoModelForImageClassification.from_pretrained(MODEL_ID).to("cuda")
+ model = torch.compile(model)
compile() comes with multiple modes for compiling, which essentially differ in compilation time and inference overhead. max-autotune takes longer than reduce-overhead but results in faster inference. Default mode is fastest for compilation but is not as efficient compared to reduce-overhead for inference time. In this guide, we used the default mode. You can learn more about it here.
We benchmarked torch.compile with different computer vision models, tasks, types of hardware, and batch sizes on torch version 2.0.1.
Benchmarking code
Below you can find the benchmarking code for each task. We warm up the GPU before inference and take the mean time of 300 inferences, using the same image each time.
Image Classification with ViT
thon
import torch
from PIL import Image
import requests
import numpy as np
from transformers import AutoImageProcessor, AutoModelForImageClassification
url = 'http://images.cocodataset.org/val2017/000000039769.jpg'
image = Image.open(requests.get(url, stream=True).raw)
processor = AutoImageProcessor.from_pretrained("google/vit-base-patch16-224")
model = AutoModelForImageClassification.from_pretrained("google/vit-base-patch16-224").to("cuda")
model = torch.compile(model)
processed_input = processor(image, return_tensors='pt').to(device="cuda")
with torch.no_grad():
_ = model(**processed_input)
Object Detection with DETR
thon
from transformers import AutoImageProcessor, AutoModelForObjectDetection
processor = AutoImageProcessor.from_pretrained("facebook/detr-resnet-50")
model = AutoModelForObjectDetection.from_pretrained("facebook/detr-resnet-50").to("cuda")
model = torch.compile(model)
texts = ["a photo of a cat", "a photo of a dog"]
inputs = processor(text=texts, images=image, return_tensors="pt").to("cuda")
with torch.no_grad():
_ = model(**inputs)
Image Segmentation with Segformer
thon
from transformers import SegformerImageProcessor, SegformerForSemanticSegmentation
processor = SegformerImageProcessor.from_pretrained("nvidia/segformer-b0-finetuned-ade-512-512")
model = SegformerForSemanticSegmentation.from_pretrained("nvidia/segformer-b0-finetuned-ade-512-512").to("cuda")
model = torch.compile(model)
seg_inputs = processor(images=image, return_tensors="pt").to("cuda")
with torch.no_grad():
_ = model(**seg_inputs)
Below you can find the list of the models we benchmarked.
Image Classification
- google/vit-base-patch16-224
- microsoft/beit-base-patch16-224-pt22k-ft22k
- facebook/convnext-large-224
- microsoft/resnet-50
Image Segmentation
- nvidia/segformer-b0-finetuned-ade-512-512
- facebook/mask2former-swin-tiny-coco-panoptic
- facebook/maskformer-swin-base-ade
- google/deeplabv3_mobilenet_v2_1.0_513
Object Detection
- google/owlvit-base-patch32
- facebook/detr-resnet-101
- microsoft/conditional-detr-resnet-50
Below you can find visualization of inference durations with and without torch.compile() and percentage improvements for each model in different hardware and batch sizes.
Below you can find inference durations in milliseconds for each model with and without compile(). Note that OwlViT results in OOM in larger batch sizes.
A100 (batch size: 1)
| Task/Model | torch 2.0 - no compile | torch 2.0 - compile |
|:---:|:---:|:---:|
| Image Classification/ViT | 9.325 | 7.584 |
| Image Segmentation/Segformer | 11.759 | 10.500 |
| Object Detection/OwlViT | 24.978 | 18.420 |
| Image Classification/BeiT | 11.282 | 8.448 |
| Object Detection/DETR | 34.619 | 19.040 |
| Image Classification/ConvNeXT | 10.410 | 10.208 |
| Image Classification/ResNet | 6.531 | 4.124 |
| Image Segmentation/Mask2former | 60.188 | 49.117 |
| Image Segmentation/Maskformer | 75.764 | 59.487 |
| Image Segmentation/MobileNet | 8.583 | 3.974 |
| Object Detection/Resnet-101 | 36.276 | 18.197 |
| Object Detection/Conditional-DETR | 31.219 | 17.993 |
A100 (batch size: 4)
| Task/Model | torch 2.0 - no compile | torch 2.0 - compile |
|:---:|:---:|:---:|
| Image Classification/ViT | 14.832 | 14.499 |
| Image Segmentation/Segformer | 18.838 | 16.476 |
| Image Classification/BeiT | 13.205 | 13.048 |
| Object Detection/DETR | 48.657 | 32.418|
| Image Classification/ConvNeXT | 22.940 | 21.631 |
| Image Classification/ResNet | 6.657 | 4.268 |
| Image Segmentation/Mask2former | 74.277 | 61.781 |
| Image Segmentation/Maskformer | 180.700 | 159.116 |
| Image Segmentation/MobileNet | 14.174 | 8.515 |
| Object Detection/Resnet-101 | 68.101 | 44.998 |
| Object Detection/Conditional-DETR | 56.470 | 35.552 |
A100 (batch size: 16)
| Task/Model | torch 2.0 - no compile | torch 2.0 - compile |
|:---:|:---:|:---:|
| Image Classification/ViT | 40.944 | 40.010 |
| Image Segmentation/Segformer | 37.005 | 31.144 |
| Image Classification/BeiT | 41.854 | 41.048 |
| Object Detection/DETR | 164.382 | 161.902 |
| Image Classification/ConvNeXT | 82.258 | 75.561 |
| Image Classification/ResNet | 7.018 | 5.024 |
| Image Segmentation/Mask2former | 178.945 | 154.814 |
| Image Segmentation/Maskformer | 638.570 | 579.826 |
| Image Segmentation/MobileNet | 51.693 | 30.310 |
| Object Detection/Resnet-101 | 232.887 | 155.021 |
| Object Detection/Conditional-DETR | 180.491 | 124.032 |
V100 (batch size: 1)
| Task/Model | torch 2.0 - no compile | torch 2.0 - compile |
|:---:|:---:|:---:|
| Image Classification/ViT | 10.495 | 6.00 |
| Image Segmentation/Segformer | 13.321 | 5.862 |
| Object Detection/OwlViT | 25.769 | 22.395 |
| Image Classification/BeiT | 11.347 | 7.234 |
| Object Detection/DETR | 33.951 | 19.388 |
| Image Classification/ConvNeXT | 11.623 | 10.412 |
| Image Classification/ResNet | 6.484 | 3.820 |
| Image Segmentation/Mask2former | 64.640 | 49.873 |
| Image Segmentation/Maskformer | 95.532 | 72.207 |
| Image Segmentation/MobileNet | 9.217 | 4.753 |
| Object Detection/Resnet-101 | 52.818 | 28.367 |
| Object Detection/Conditional-DETR | 39.512 | 20.816 |
V100 (batch size: 4)
| Task/Model | torch 2.0 - no compile | torch 2.0 - compile |
|:---:|:---:|:---:|
| Image Classification/ViT | 15.181 | 14.501 |
| Image Segmentation/Segformer | 16.787 | 16.188 |
| Image Classification/BeiT | 15.171 | 14.753 |
| Object Detection/DETR | 88.529 | 64.195 |
| Image Classification/ConvNeXT | 29.574 | 27.085 |
| Image Classification/ResNet | 6.109 | 4.731 |
| Image Segmentation/Mask2former | 90.402 | 76.926 |
| Image Segmentation/Maskformer | 234.261 | 205.456 |
| Image Segmentation/MobileNet | 24.623 | 14.816 |
| Object Detection/Resnet-101 | 134.672 | 101.304 |
| Object Detection/Conditional-DETR | 97.464 | 69.739 |
V100 (batch size: 16)
| Task/Model | torch 2.0 - no compile | torch 2.0 - compile |
|:---:|:---:|:---:|
| Image Classification/ViT | 52.209 | 51.633 |
| Image Segmentation/Segformer | 61.013 | 55.499 |
| Image Classification/BeiT | 53.938 | 53.581 |
| Object Detection/DETR | OOM | OOM |
| Image Classification/ConvNeXT | 109.682 | 100.771 |
| Image Classification/ResNet | 14.857 | 12.089 |
| Image Segmentation/Mask2former | 249.605 | 222.801 |
| Image Segmentation/Maskformer | 831.142 | 743.645 |
| Image Segmentation/MobileNet | 93.129 | 55.365 |
| Object Detection/Resnet-101 | 482.425 | 361.843 |
| Object Detection/Conditional-DETR | 344.661 | 255.298 |
T4 (batch size: 1)
| Task/Model | torch 2.0 - no compile | torch 2.0 - compile |
|:---:|:---:|:---:|
| Image Classification/ViT | 16.520 | 15.786 |
| Image Segmentation/Segformer | 16.116 | 14.205 |
| Object Detection/OwlViT | 53.634 | 51.105 |
| Image Classification/BeiT | 16.464 | 15.710 |
| Object Detection/DETR | 73.100 | 53.99 |
| Image Classification/ConvNeXT | 32.932 | 30.845 |
| Image Classification/ResNet | 6.031 | 4.321 |
| Image Segmentation/Mask2former | 79.192 | 66.815 |
| Image Segmentation/Maskformer | 200.026 | 188.268 |
| Image Segmentation/MobileNet | 18.908 | 11.997 |
| Object Detection/Resnet-101 | 106.622 | 82.566 |
| Object Detection/Conditional-DETR | 77.594 | 56.984 |
T4 (batch size: 4)
| Task/Model | torch 2.0 - no compile | torch 2.0 - compile |
|:---:|:---:|:---:|
| Image Classification/ViT | 43.653 | 43.626 |
| Image Segmentation/Segformer | 45.327 | 42.445 |
| Image Classification/BeiT | 52.007 | 51.354 |
| Object Detection/DETR | 277.850 | 268.003 |
| Image Classification/ConvNeXT | 119.259 | 105.580 |
| Image Classification/ResNet | 13.039 | 11.388 |
| Image Segmentation/Mask2former | 201.540 | 184.670 |
| Image Segmentation/Maskformer | 764.052 | 711.280 |
| Image Segmentation/MobileNet | 74.289 | 48.677 |
| Object Detection/Resnet-101 | 421.859 | 357.614 |
| Object Detection/Conditional-DETR | 289.002 | 226.945 |
T4 (batch size: 16)
| Task/Model | torch 2.0 - no compile | torch 2.0 - compile |
|:---:|:---:|:---:|
| Image Classification/ViT | 163.914 | 160.907 |
| Image Segmentation/Segformer | 192.412 | 163.620 |
| Image Classification/BeiT | 188.978 | 187.976 |
| Object Detection/DETR | OOM | OOM |
| Image Classification/ConvNeXT | 422.886 | 388.078 |
| Image Classification/ResNet | 44.114 | 37.604 |
| Image Segmentation/Mask2former | 756.337 | 695.291 |
| Image Segmentation/Maskformer | 2842.940 | 2656.88 |
| Image Segmentation/MobileNet | 299.003 | 201.942 |
| Object Detection/Resnet-101 | 1619.505 | 1262.758 |
| Object Detection/Conditional-DETR | 1137.513 | 897.390|
PyTorch Nightly
We also benchmarked on PyTorch nightly (2.1.0dev, find the wheel here) and observed improvement in latency both for uncompiled and compiled models.
A100
| Task/Model | Batch Size | torch 2.0 - no compile | torch 2.0 - compile |
|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|
| Image Classification/BeiT | Unbatched | 12.462 | 6.954 |
| Image Classification/BeiT | 4 | 14.109 | 12.851 |
| Image Classification/BeiT | 16 | 42.179 | 42.147 |
| Object Detection/DETR | Unbatched | 30.484 | 15.221 |
| Object Detection/DETR | 4 | 46.816 | 30.942 |
| Object Detection/DETR | 16 | 163.749 | 163.706 |
T4
| Task/Model | Batch Size | torch 2.0 - no compile | torch 2.0 - compile |
|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|
| Image Classification/BeiT | Unbatched | 14.408 | 14.052 |
| Image Classification/BeiT | 4 | 47.381 | 46.604 |
| Image Classification/BeiT | 16 | 42.179 | 42.147 |
| Object Detection/DETR | Unbatched | 68.382 | 53.481 |
| Object Detection/DETR | 4 | 269.615 | 204.785 |
| Object Detection/DETR | 16 | OOM | OOM |
V100
| Task/Model | Batch Size | torch 2.0 - no compile | torch 2.0 - compile |
|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|
| Image Classification/BeiT | Unbatched | 13.477 | 7.926 |
| Image Classification/BeiT | 4 | 15.103 | 14.378 |
| Image Classification/BeiT | 16 | 52.517 | 51.691 |
| Object Detection/DETR | Unbatched | 28.706 | 19.077 |
| Object Detection/DETR | 4 | 88.402 | 62.949|
| Object Detection/DETR | 16 | OOM | OOM |
Reduce Overhead
We benchmarked reduce-overhead compilation mode for A100 and T4 in Nightly.
A100
| Task/Model | Batch Size | torch 2.0 - no compile | torch 2.0 - compile |
|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|
| Image Classification/ConvNeXT | Unbatched | 11.758 | 7.335 |
| Image Classification/ConvNeXT | 4 | 23.171 | 21.490 |
| Image Classification/ResNet | Unbatched | 7.435 | 3.801 |
| Image Classification/ResNet | 4 | 7.261 | 2.187 |
| Object Detection/Conditional-DETR | Unbatched | 32.823 | 11.627 |
| Object Detection/Conditional-DETR | 4 | 50.622 | 33.831 |
| Image Segmentation/MobileNet | Unbatched | 9.869 | 4.244 |
| Image Segmentation/MobileNet | 4 | 14.385 | 7.946 |
T4
| Task/Model | Batch Size | torch 2.0 - no compile | torch 2.0 - compile |
|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|
| Image Classification/ConvNeXT | Unbatched | 32.137 | 31.84 |
| Image Classification/ConvNeXT | 4 | 120.944 | 110.209 |
| Image Classification/ResNet | Unbatched | 9.761 | 7.698 |
| Image Classification/ResNet | 4 | 15.215 | 13.871 |
| Object Detection/Conditional-DETR | Unbatched | 72.150 | 57.660 |
| Object Detection/Conditional-DETR | 4 | 301.494 | 247.543 |
| Image Segmentation/MobileNet | Unbatched | 22.266 | 19.339 |
| Image Segmentation/MobileNet | 4 | 78.311 | 50.983 | |