ShiwenNi commited on
Commit
33e0c02
1 Parent(s): dd8352a

Update app.py

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. app.py +2 -4
app.py CHANGED
@@ -156,7 +156,6 @@ inp = [gradio.inputs.Textbox(label="请输入你的API-key(sk开头的字符串)
156
  default="""* Overall Review
157
  Please briefly summarize the main points and contributions of this paper.
158
  xxx
159
-
160
  * Paper Strength
161
  Please provide a list of the strengths of this paper, including but not limited to: innovative and practical methodology, insightful empirical findings or in-depth theoretical analysis,
162
  well-structured review of relevant literature, and any other factors that may make the paper valuable to readers. (Maximum length: 2,000 characters)
@@ -176,8 +175,7 @@ Please provide a numbered list of specific and clear questions that pertain to t
176
  The questions should be formulated in a manner that, after the authors have answered them during the rebuttal, it would enable a more thorough assessment of the paper's quality. (Maximum length: 2,000 characters)
177
  *Overall score (1-10)
178
  The paper is scored on a scale of 1-10, with 10 being the full mark, and 6 stands for borderline accept. Then give the reason for your rating.
179
- xxx
180
- """
181
  ),
182
  gradio.inputs.File(label="请上传论文PDF(必填)"),
183
  gradio.inputs.Radio(choices=["English", "Chinese"],
@@ -187,7 +185,7 @@ xxx
187
 
188
  chat_reviewer_gui = gradio.Interface(fn=main,
189
  inputs=inp,
190
- outputs = [gradio.Textbox(lines=20, label="评审结果"), gradio.Textbox(lines=2, label="资源统计")],
191
  title=title,
192
  description=description)
193
 
 
156
  default="""* Overall Review
157
  Please briefly summarize the main points and contributions of this paper.
158
  xxx
 
159
  * Paper Strength
160
  Please provide a list of the strengths of this paper, including but not limited to: innovative and practical methodology, insightful empirical findings or in-depth theoretical analysis,
161
  well-structured review of relevant literature, and any other factors that may make the paper valuable to readers. (Maximum length: 2,000 characters)
 
175
  The questions should be formulated in a manner that, after the authors have answered them during the rebuttal, it would enable a more thorough assessment of the paper's quality. (Maximum length: 2,000 characters)
176
  *Overall score (1-10)
177
  The paper is scored on a scale of 1-10, with 10 being the full mark, and 6 stands for borderline accept. Then give the reason for your rating.
178
+ xxx"""
 
179
  ),
180
  gradio.inputs.File(label="请上传论文PDF(必填)"),
181
  gradio.inputs.Radio(choices=["English", "Chinese"],
 
185
 
186
  chat_reviewer_gui = gradio.Interface(fn=main,
187
  inputs=inp,
188
+ outputs = [gradio.Textbox(lines=22, label="评审结果"), gradio.Textbox(lines=2, label="资源统计")],
189
  title=title,
190
  description=description)
191