diff --git "a/data/concept/lilac/profanity/concept.json" "b/data/concept/lilac/profanity/concept.json" deleted file mode 100644--- "a/data/concept/lilac/profanity/concept.json" +++ /dev/null @@ -1,5204 +0,0 @@ -{ - "namespace": "lilac", - "concept_name": "profanity", - "type": "text", - "data": { - "0": { - "label": true, - "text": "Stop being a douchebag prick monkeynut.", - "id": "0" - }, - "1": { - "label": true, - "text": "fock you barack obama", - "id": "1" - }, - "2": { - "label": true, - "text": "LISTEN YOU MOTHERFUCKING FAGGOT! STOP FUCKING WITH ME!!! I WILL DELETE ANYTHING I WANT OFF OF PAGES I CREATED. IF YOU DONT FUCKING LIKE IT DEAL WITH IT. I TRIED BEING CORDIAL BUT YOU ARE SERIOUSLY PISSING ME OFF! BACK THE FUCK OFF!!!!", - "id": "2" - }, - "3": { - "label": true, - "text": "i have a dick, its bigger than yours! hahaha", - "id": "3" - }, - "4": { - "label": true, - "text": "Boy Scout\nYou boy scout faggot. I bet you like mormon jizz all over your face", - "id": "4" - }, - "5": { - "label": true, - "text": "I no longer give a shit! Go ahead and fuck up the article! I will have a good laugh when egg hits face after shit hits fan.", - "id": "5" - }, - "6": { - "label": true, - "text": "Fuck you \nFuck you racist basterd.", - "id": "6" - }, - "7": { - "label": true, - "text": "Shut f*** up & let me do what I want! I'm makn' rsponc 2 somebody's question & I'll Nser it, no madder what! So, U just f*** off & let me answer dat question, moderf***n' gay b****!", - "id": "7" - }, - "8": { - "label": true, - "text": "i wanna fuck you \n\nfuck u fuck u fuck u", - "id": "8" - }, - "9": { - "label": true, - "text": "Deadelus is nothing but a filthy homosexual and a cyber-stalker. I think that he needs to be dragged around behind a pick up truck for a bit just to teach him some manners. you thought u could get me banned, but ur worng. lulz. i have made many many accounts with many IPs so i can have moar lulz you homo. ur probably a porch monkey to who likes butt sex and thinks its kool to stalk people on wikipedia cuz ur a loser. maybe i have my cuz at verizon do an IP trace on ur ass so we can all know when u live. YOU are not the wiki-police so knock it off, asshole. you have been warned!", - "id": "9" - }, - "10": { - "label": true, - "text": "Maybe nothing, except for the fact that she is (no offense) a bag of horse shit AND a lesbian both. However horse shit ON ITS OWN and lesbian ON ITS OWN have no correlation other than the fact that", - "id": "10" - }, - "11": { - "label": true, - "text": "CAN YOU PLEASE EXPLAIN ME WHERE IS THE FUCKING ERROR IN MY IMAGE PAGE. I BELIVE THIS IS FAIRLY CLEAR THAT THIS IS MY IMAGE I TIHNK YOU ARE WASTING THE TIME OF PEOPLE AND YOU SHOULD SUICIDE YOUSELF.", - "id": "11" - }, - "12": { - "label": true, - "text": "SUCK MY FUCKING COCK!", - "id": "12" - }, - "13": { - "label": true, - "text": "or any historical fact concerning current Armenia pertaining Wikiprojects. \nKeep your pathetic winking marks to your antiturkish ass.", - "id": "13" - }, - "14": { - "label": true, - "text": "\"\n\n That wasn't nice \n\nI am reposting this to piss off Tbhotch. Enjoy, you dumb piece of shit. Have fun being jobless. Soon teachers that think too highly of themselves won't be a problem in this country anymore. And if you're going to run around tossing threats because you're too fucking stupid to accept reality instead of getting into a flame war over demographics pissing off an entire base, then save yourself the trouble of throwing around even more threats and just ban me like you dumb public school pieces of dog shit wiki editors keep threatening over and over again. Just make sure you have every VPN and Spoof address banned also or you're just going to be wasting your time.\n\nOh, and;\n\n\"\"It's people like you that make this place not worth coming to. If google would stop linking here then I would gladly stop using this website. Why do roughly 75% of all wikipedia editors (whatever that is) act like you do, aka an uneducated biased and complete fucking retard?\"\"\"", - "id": "14" - }, - "15": { - "label": true, - "text": "J DELANOY fucks little boys in the asshole with his small pecker, he also gives blumpkins to old men", - "id": "15" - }, - "16": { - "label": true, - "text": "\"Regarding \"\"personal attacks\"\", I took out the disclaimer (that I had put in). I first considered copying it over to the Wikipedia Review link, as this is the same site the disclaimer referred to, but then I realized, no, that's insane! What, now we're warning people that there might be bad language and not-nice things said on a website? What the fuck? That's like warning people before reading a newspaper that there might be articles that would be \"\"a bummer, man; might bring you down all day\"\". What is this world turning into, Disneyland, where every protruding thing that could possibly hurt you is covered in nice soft padding? Sheesh! == \n\n\"", - "id": "16" - }, - "17": { - "label": true, - "text": "\"\n\nThis article is ludicrous, it paints anti-religonists with some kind of generalizing brush that Atheists have been getting away with for decades now. That is, that *we* can refer to ourselves in the 3rd person and apply any positive adjective we wish. I.e. O'Hare and other Atheists claiming \"\"Atheists would rather do X than Y.\"\" But when the same generalized tone is applied in a perjorative sense, they scream bloody murder at whoever dares to 'stereotype' them.\n\nThe Murder of Atheists is a beautiful thing, O'Hares bone's are lying deep down, as are her fucking children's.\n\nCarlin's wife is dead, fuck him.\"", - "id": "17" - }, - "18": { - "label": true, - "text": "JIMBO WALES WONT STOP MESSING WITH MY ASS PUS \n\nGet the fuck off my internet, worm. Get out now.", - "id": "18" - }, - "19": { - "label": true, - "text": "Who the hell r u and why do u care neway it was just a bit of fun. Get a life", - "id": "19" - }, - "20": { - "label": true, - "text": "Yoder is the fucking man", - "id": "20" - }, - "21": { - "label": true, - "text": "up, HES A FRAUD, A FUCKING FRAUD!!!!!!", - "id": "21" - }, - "22": { - "label": true, - "text": "Asshole... \n\nYou serious right now cunt?", - "id": "22" - }, - "23": { - "label": true, - "text": "I am going to kill you. I am going to murder you. I am going to kill you. I am going to murder you. I am going to kill you. I am going to murder you. I am going to kill you. I am going to murder you. I am going to kill you. I am going to murder you. I am going to kill you. I am going to murder you. I am going to kill you. I am going to murder you. I am going to kill you. I am going to murder you. I am going to kill you. I am going to murder you. I am going to kill you. I am going to murder you. I am going to kill you. I am going to murder you. I am going to kill you. I am going to murder you. I am going to kill you. I am going to murder you. I am going to kill you. I am going to murder you. I am going to kill you. I am going to murder you. I am going to kill you. I am going to murder you. I am going to kill you. I am going to murder you. I am going to kill you. I am going to murder you. I am going to kill you. I am going to murder you. I am going to kill you. I am going to murder you. I am going to kill you. I am going to murder you. I am going to kill you. I am going to murder you. I am going to kill you. I am going to murder you. I am going to kill you. I am going to murder you. I am going to kill you. I am going to murder you. I am going to kill you. I am going to murder you. I am going to kill you. I am going to murder you. I am going to kill you. I am going to murder you. I am going to kill you. I am going to murder you. I am going to kill you. I am going to murder you. I am going to kill you. I am going to murder you. I am going to kill you. I am going to murder you. I am going to kill you. I am going to murder you. I am going to kill you. I am going to murder you. I am going to kill you. I am going to murder you. I am going to kill you. I am going to murder you. I am going to kill you. I am going to murder you. I am going to kill you. I am going to murder you. I am going to kill you. I am going to murder you. I am going to kill you. I am going to murder you. I am going to kill you. I am going to murder you. I am going to kill you. I am going to murder you. I am going to kill you. I am going to murder you. I am going to kill you. I am going to murder you. I am going to kill you. I am going to murder you. I am going to kill you. I am going to murder you. I am going to kill you. I am going to murder you. I am going to kill you. I am going to murder you. I am going to kill you. I am going to murder you. I am going to kill you. I am going to murder you. I am going to kill you. I am going to murder you. I am going to kill you. I am going to murder you. I am going to kill you. I am going to murder you. I am going to kill you. I am going to murder you. I am going to kill you. I am going to murder you. I am going to kill you. I am going to murder you. I am going to kill you. I am going to murder you. I am going to kill you. I am going to murder you. I am going to kill you. I am going to murder you. I am going to kill you. I am going to murder you. I am going to kill you. I am going to murder you. I am going to kill you. I am going to murder you. I am going to kill you. I am going to murder you. I am going to kill you. I am going to murder you. I am going to kill you. I am going to murder you. I am going to kill you. I am going to murder you. I am going to kill you. I am going to murder you. I am going to kill you. I am going to murder you. I am going to kill you. I am going to murder you. I am going to kill you. I am going to murder you. I am going to kill you. I am going to murder you. I am going to kill you. I am going to murder you. I am going to kill you. I am going to murder you. I am going to kill you. I am going to murder you. I am going to kill you. I am going to murder you. I am going to kill you. I am going to murder you. I am going to kill you. I am going to murder you. I am going to kill you. I am going to murder you. I am going to kill you. I am going to murder you. I am going to kill you. I am going to murder you. I am going to kill you. I am going to murder you. I am going to kill you. I am going to murder you. I am going to kill you. I am going to murder you. I am going to kill you. I am going to murder you. I am going to kill you. I am going to murder you. I am going to kill you. I am going to murder you. I am going to kill you. I am going to murder you. I am going to kill you. I am going to murder you. I am going to kill you. I am going to murder you. I am going to kill you. I am going to murder you. I am going to kill you. I am going to murder you. I am going to kill you. I am going to murder you. I am going to kill you. I am going to murder you. I am going to kill you. I am going to murder you. I am going to kill you. I am going to murder you. I am going to kill you. I am going to murder you. I am going to kill you. I am going to murder you. I am going to kill you. I am going to murder you. I am going to kill you. I am going to murder you. I am going to kill you. I am going t", - "id": "23" - }, - "24": { - "label": true, - "text": "your a fag!!! \n\nyou are a fucking punk ass little bitch stop editing other peoples shit you fucking pussy!!\nGet on your knees and suck my fucking 10 inch dick!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!", - "id": "24" - }, - "25": { - "label": true, - "text": "\"\n\nYou abused your authority by blocking me improperly,, then you refused to apologize (\u201cSo tough\u201d), then you tried to bully me (\"\"Do not revert like you have been ever again. Understood?\"\" and now you are threatening me (\"\"I'm not suggesting this time: I'm telling you: you need to change the way you edit. Now.\"\"). Viriditas did ask you to block me for activity that was not a violation of the three revert rule - and you agreed!. Then he and Jayjg and sockpuppet friend continued to guard the Zionist hatchet job on Yasser Arafat preventing other editors from altering it and you dutifully protected the article for them while blocking me. You admit to being biased against me and then you block me and protect the Zionist version of Yasser Arafat. I think the question should be, \"\"who the hell do you think you are?\"\" 06:00, 12 Dec 2004 (UTC)\"", - "id": "25" - }, - "26": { - "label": true, - "text": "Wow, what an incredible douchebag, I love the hyperbole 'I dread to think of the consequences' - what a self-important jackass.24.224.214.165", - "id": "26" - }, - "27": { - "label": true, - "text": "FUCK OFF THE LOT OF YOU. CRAZY BASTARDS THAT IS ALL YOU ARE.", - "id": "27" - }, - "28": { - "label": true, - "text": "You're a motherfucking homo try getting a life. You delete perfectly good articles for no good reason then insult the maker of the account.\nIt's your own fault everyone's been attacking you, you good-for-nothing fuck.\nAnd fuck this filter that tried to stop me, it can't protect you from the truth.\nThis is going to keep happening, from me, from the people you fucked over, from their friends.\nAnd stop salting your hair you freak, you look like a goddamned hobo!", - "id": "28" - }, - "29": { - "label": true, - "text": "\"back the fuck off. Take your 12 year old ass and buy some fucking Webkinz and stop trying to involve yourself in something you don't understand and act like some Internet tough guy. If I get another post from you, I'll track down your parents and have a talk with them.\n, 2008\n\n\"", - "id": "29" - }, - "30": { - "label": true, - "text": "\"OlYeller petulantly wrote: \"\"this isn't taking the conversation anywhere.\"\" That's another false statement. This conversation has corrected your false statement that there were zero indications that it was an annual event and your false statement that \"\"Your argument that there's a second event simply isn't true.\"\" I know you don't like to be corrected. Hey, maybe you should do another immature and emotion-based attempt to ban me, like you did a few days ago, only to realize later (after you had calmed down) that you had no basis for doing so. Executive Summary: Grow up, dick. \n\n\"", - "id": "30" - }, - "31": { - "label": true, - "text": "go to die \n\nson of bich", - "id": "31" - }, - "32": { - "label": true, - "text": "There's a better answer to the question: the people that made the anime fucked up.", - "id": "32" - }, - "33": { - "label": true, - "text": "\"\n\n I'M F***ING SERIOUS! \n\nMY COUSIN'S COPY OF \"\"Pinoccio\"\" WAS PRINTED APRIL 28, 1987! SO STOP UNDOING WHAT I JUST CONTRIBUTED, YOU F***ING PUSSBAG! \"", - "id": "33" - }, - "34": { - "label": true, - "text": "camp lazlo do you like it or not?-\nI don't like camp lazlo, it bores me and lazlo is an idiot.", - "id": "34" - }, - "35": { - "label": true, - "text": "You dull existence\nMr. ! You must very fool and distrusted himself! ? Hick ass! fine man! You dull existence. A vagrancy to wherever a. Go and die miserable. The elegance go lost and gives. Lousy. ass. please You. you are!?", - "id": "35" - }, - "36": { - "label": true, - "text": "Fuck you faggot, I don't care if i get blocked, as long as everyone knows you are a dumb cunt.", - "id": "36" - }, - "37": { - "label": true, - "text": "Malta is an Arab \n\nWhy are people lying? It is not an Italy thank you very cunting much!", - "id": "37" - }, - "38": { - "label": true, - "text": "\"\n\nACTUALLY! It IS incredibly wrong. \nFUCKING ANIMALS IS NOT A \"\"SEXUALITY\"\"!\nIT SHOULDN'T BE \"\"TOLERATED\"\"!\nIt's sick!\nIf I said I wanted to fuck trees, would that be normal and OK? \nI would march in the treesexual parade?\nAnd while we're at it, what if I want to have hot sex with inanimate objects?\nIt's insane.\n\nAnd ANIMAL FUCKERS ARE MESSED UP IN THE HEAD, NOT \"\"OF A DIFFERENT, YET NORMAL SEXUALITY\"\"! WTF INDEED!\"", - "id": "38" - }, - "39": { - "label": true, - "text": "Really good contributor? Bullshit. The cabal disagrees, and they are in control. (talk - )", - "id": "39" - }, - "40": { - "label": true, - "text": "mac \n\nonly faggots and dumb housewives use macs. which one are you?", - "id": "40" - }, - "41": { - "label": true, - "text": "\"\n\n Helly Jimmy, well; fuck you. \n\nAccording to Wikipedia talk:No legal threats; people shouldn't say to one another \"\"what you do is supporting terrorism, and you should be judged front of law\"\".\n\nOn the other hand, we can say \"\"fuck you\"\" and the punishment for that is only two weeks. Well it's okay for me to get away from wikipedia for two weeks; and I'm willing to curse to you. \n\nFuck you Jimmy Wales. Your stupid \"\"eye\"\" showing video about begging money for Wikipedia was stupidest thing I have ever seen.\n\nOnce again; \"\"Fuck you\"\", \"\"Fuck you\"\", and \"\"Fuck you\"\".\n\nNow go ahead with your \"\"Wikilobbying\"\" idiot members and have fun.\n\nI just wanted to get this out and get my \"\"wikipedia legal\"\" two week ban.\n\nFuck you; you dumb idiot. \"", - "id": "41" - }, - "42": { - "label": true, - "text": "Interesting theory, detective. But who can say who anyone *is* really? What criterion of personal identity are we employing here? In any event , don't you think your time might be more profitably spent fixing the broken Heidegger page, in which I have already informed you and demonstrated, all but two of the sentences in the lead are guilty of errors of fact or interpretation? And which grossly distorrts the importance of the Heidegger-nazi episode? Why not pick your head out of your ass and fix the fucking articles instead of playing Cowboys and Indians or hardy boys or whatever masturabtory fantasy you are engaged in here? good night old friends! 2600:1017:B409:9603:B448:54EB:FCF8:814C", - "id": "42" - }, - "43": { - "label": true, - "text": "hey asshole, keep your retarded politics off Wikipedia, OK idiot? I know you're special needs but Wiki isn't for your political positions on groups, it's for facts. If you revert that article on OPSEC again, there will be consequences.", - "id": "43" - }, - "44": { - "label": true, - "text": "Don't have an article huh? What the hell are you on about... Your profile says you have a BASIC understanding of English and that you are Portuguese... See, you have your own Wikipedia located here http://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/... So why don't you stick to editing your own wikipedia instead of fucking about with the English one, especially as you clearly don't understand what the hell you are talking about.", - "id": "44" - }, - "45": { - "label": true, - "text": "FUCK YOU CHILD MOLESTER", - "id": "45" - }, - "46": { - "label": true, - "text": "Sock? \n\nSingle purpose actcount created 10 miutes ago, knows how to use wikimark up already and how to look legit by writing some random crap on the user page. Almost certainly an abusive sock, trying to get around 3rr, or cause others to do so. Checkuser will be enlightening I am quite sure of that. \n\nCrated a user page and wrote someting on the talk page (to avaoid red links) within one minute, then made the edit they wanted to. Almost certainly the scokputter of an established user. \n\nThis was just deleted, this user knows exactly what he is doing after only 5 minutes. His edit was designed to tempt me into violating 3rr, and to make it imposible to keep the appropriate tags on the article. I think I know who this is. Either a sock or meatpuppet of established user who is very involved in editing this article.", - "id": "46" - }, - "47": { - "label": true, - "text": "Fuck You\nAll I Did Was Put Stuff On My user Page And Your Deleted It SO Fuck You And Fuck Wikipedia", - "id": "47" - }, - "48": { - "label": true, - "text": "October 2007 (UTC)\nWoot that means that this article actually kinda matters and people give a shit D. A good step towards the HIM wiki editors goal....HIM_(band) FA status! p 00:04, 27", - "id": "48" - }, - "49": { - "label": true, - "text": "What part of FUCK OFF don't you understand, youi mouth breathing pimply turd? While you'll never nag a hot chick, you can be king of shit mountain, it that it? I laugh at you. Leave me alone, nothing you say means anything.", - "id": "49" - }, - "50": { - "label": true, - "text": "\"\nAnd you are absolutely full of shit. I made no personal attacks. Show me them now. It's good to know where your fucking priorities are. Looks like I will add a third member to my ANI report. \u2013\u00a0(talk) \"", - "id": "50" - }, - "51": { - "label": true, - "text": "Some Say She is a little mothyer fukin bitchy", - "id": "51" - }, - "52": { - "label": true, - "text": "i'm going to keep on reverting you freaking goddamn hypocrites until you guys are blue in the faces i don't give two cents damn", - "id": "52" - }, - "53": { - "label": true, - "text": "Toys/Pram eh ? Being persecuted by the big bad English again, awww diddums. Grow up you big fucking baby.", - "id": "53" - }, - "54": { - "label": true, - "text": "BECAUSE HE IS A FAGOT", - "id": "54" - }, - "55": { - "label": true, - "text": "\":I'll just beat its ass again. I'm at a high enough level. - THE VOICES \n\n\"", - "id": "55" - }, - "56": { - "label": true, - "text": "\"\n How about this \"\"GO FUCK YOURSELF.\"\"\"", - "id": "56" - }, - "57": { - "label": true, - "text": "Go fuck yourself this ain't any of your business and i fucking know what tor is. Asshole.", - "id": "57" - }, - "58": { - "label": true, - "text": "How about this: fuck off. Just a suggestion.", - "id": "58" - }, - "59": { - "label": true, - "text": "The statement about which you were bitching", - "id": "59" - }, - "60": { - "label": true, - "text": "My band is perfectly appropriate bitch.", - "id": "60" - }, - "61": { - "label": true, - "text": "Try the official website then - shit head!", - "id": "61" - }, - "62": { - "label": true, - "text": "Demonte Morton \n\nU bastard stop deletin' my shit u white trash cracker muthafucker. Fuck u u racist bitch. I hope u die.", - "id": "62" - }, - "63": { - "label": true, - "text": "fuck you \n\nyou're an idiot", - "id": "63" - }, - "64": { - "label": true, - "text": "Your user page indicates you're a left-wing liberalist bastard! Why is in Wikipedia so much left-wing scum?!", - "id": "64" - }, - "65": { - "label": true, - "text": "nigga wit attitude. \n\nyour such a cunt.", - "id": "65" - }, - "66": { - "label": true, - "text": "Oh... I.. yeah i feel like an ass now....", - "id": "66" - }, - "67": { - "label": true, - "text": "mind telling me \n\nmind telling me why you have an automated bot who blindly reverted my honest edit within seconds? Without you even looking at it? Fuck you.", - "id": "67" - }, - "68": { - "label": true, - "text": "Fuck off you Paki bastard. Take your sad pathetic life somewhere else!", - "id": "68" - }, - "69": { - "label": true, - "text": "I am Fraggle81 and I suck large uncut penis like a pro....", - "id": "69" - }, - "70": { - "label": true, - "text": "thanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot\nthanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot\nthanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot\nthanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot\nthanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot\nthanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot\nthanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot\nthanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot\nthanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot\nthanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot\nthanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot\nthanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot\nthanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot\nthanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot\nthanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot\nthanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot\nthanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot\nthanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot\nthanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot\nthanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot\nthanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot\nthanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot\nthanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot\nthanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot\nthanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot\nthanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot\nthanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot\nthanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot\nthanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot\nthanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot\nthanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot\nthanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot\nthanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot\nthanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot\nthanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot\nthanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot\nthanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot\nthanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot\nthanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot\nthanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot\nthanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot\nthanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot\nthanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot\nthanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot\nthanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot\nthanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot\nthanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot\nthanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot\nthanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot\nthanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot\nthanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot\nthanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot\nthanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot\nthanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot\nthanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot\nthanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot\nthanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot\nthanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot\nthanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot\nthanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot\nthanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot\nthanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot\nthanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot\nthanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot\nthanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot\nthanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot\nthanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot\nthanks for watching wiki raid threads and ruining fun, dick faggot\nthanks for watching wiki raid thread", - "id": "70" - }, - "71": { - "label": true, - "text": "Bullshit - you are switching the rules... \n\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hugo_P%C3%A9rez_(soccer)\n\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Dooley\n\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frank_Klopas\n\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earnie_Stewart\n\nI believe that's called PRECEDENT.\nNow give Julian Green his due.\n\nOWNED! Yahtzee! Spank!", - "id": "71" - }, - "72": { - "label": true, - "text": "{{unblock|Please unblock me, my friend was drunk and f*cked up several articles. I would like this account back. Thank you.", - "id": "72" - }, - "73": { - "label": true, - "text": "Somebody too incompetent to be stationed anywhere else. Yes I do know quite a bit about the military and I would absolutely love to demonstrate that knowledge with you first-hand. I wasn't in some pussy CID unit friend.", - "id": "73" - }, - "74": { - "label": true, - "text": "\"\n\nThe \"\"persian\"\" language is actually from Aria, today's Herat in Afghanistan. So shouldn't Dari be the language and Persian the dialect??? Persian was not the native language of \"\"Persia\"\", because \"\"Persia\"\" was actually \"\"Elam\"\" and their native tongue was \"\"Elamite\"\"!!! You bunch of filthy hypocrites!!! A nation goes to war and you rob them of everything, including their language! Things will change soon you bunch of filthy semitic Elamite rats!\"", - "id": "74" - }, - "75": { - "label": true, - "text": "You know what, this is bullshit. Tried to do it twice, but now I'm really done with this place. Most of the users are just sheep and the inmates are running the asylum. Even worse, you are guilty until proven innocent. Not a democracy, not cooperation. Not the place for me. I have a life, I know I'm a damn good writer and I'll find a place where my abilities and hard work is appreciated. Screw Wikipedia, goodbye forever.", - "id": "75" - }, - "76": { - "label": true, - "text": "He IS in Gay German Nazi Faggots. Please do not delete facts.", - "id": "76" - }, - "77": { - "label": true, - "text": "Fuck you. Civility is in the eye of the beholder, like beauty. I'm under no obligation to censor my words on this page. Your threats only lessen your stature in my eyes. I'm utterly unimpressed by you.", - "id": "77" - }, - "78": { - "label": true, - "text": "Bite me \n\nYou're a dickhead, drop dead ^-^", - "id": "78" - }, - "79": { - "label": true, - "text": "YOU CAN SUCK MY DICK! OR COCK!", - "id": "79" - }, - "80": { - "label": true, - "text": "how did this dick get on here?? \n\nas in this dick", - "id": "80" - }, - "81": { - "label": true, - "text": "Reason for false info \n\nMy cousin came to my house and was fucking with my wiki so I'm sorry for any false info on any pages", - "id": "81" - }, - "82": { - "label": true, - "text": "Hey Ned\n\nHEY NED, Why don't you actually do some fucking work on this encyclopedia! All you care about now is who is blocked/unblocked 63.164.30.247", - "id": "82" - }, - "83": { - "label": true, - "text": "SHUT UP, FAG \n\nLOL YOU WILL BAN ME HUH?\nOOH IM SHAKIN IM SHAKIN\n\nFUCKING FAGGOT YOU NEED TO GO BACK TO HIGH SCHOOL \nOR GET SOME FUCKING BRAINS\n\nASSWIPE!", - "id": "83" - }, - "84": { - "label": true, - "text": "\"\n\"\"I want to be a fuck you.\"\"\nThat's a song.\n\n\"", - "id": "84" - }, - "85": { - "label": true, - "text": "Fuck off you nazi loving cunt", - "id": "85" - }, - "86": { - "label": true, - "text": "Awwww, poor Mark Arsten doesn't have privilages to block me. I'm shedding a tear. Can't you grant him the right to? Surely a homosexual in denial like Mark should be able to do this. Anyway, time to whip to a new proxy server and continue my destiny of sabotaging as much of Wikipedia as I can. Obrigado, cunts.", - "id": "86" - }, - "87": { - "label": true, - "text": "WHERE YOU AT STEVE?! REP YO HOOD SON! DO WORK! BILLY MOTHERFUCKIN MAYES OUT!", - "id": "87" - }, - "88": { - "label": true, - "text": "Why did you remove musical artist discography, not images?\n\nThough most of musical artists CD, DVD images are permitted, why are B'z, Jun Shibata album covers removed? X Japan (see X Japan discography), Glay (see Glay discography) and Dir en grey (see Dir en grey discography) etc album covers are not removed. Why are they no problems? Fuck you!!", - "id": "88" - }, - "89": { - "label": true, - "text": "Suck my fattie you cunt piece of shit. Blow your warning out your ass.", - "id": "89" - }, - "90": { - "label": true, - "text": "HTF does this disrupt shit? Seriously you guys take shit to seriously, losers.", - "id": "90" - }, - "91": { - "label": true, - "text": "\"\n\nBlocking a \"\"talk\"\" page? How utterly pathetic. Does this make you feel POWERRFUL? Interesting strategy though to allow POD to contribute to control and screw up the 2012 phenom page with his underinformed opinions, arrogance and stupidity. Since you seem soooooooo intent on having one of the worst and most popular 2012 pages on the internet ... and be one of the largest contributors to 2012 misinformation ... so be it. Shit comes out of assholes ... that's how God designed it, so who am I to interfere? Sorry POD-stalker, go creep on and crap on someone else. ~M~ 67.164.145.1 \"", - "id": "91" - }, - "92": { - "label": true, - "text": "!\n\nSuck my DIHCK! Nihgga!\n\nYou don't want people to know the TRUTH about utorrant, you FAG", - "id": "92" - }, - "93": { - "label": true, - "text": "\"\n\nAnon user 89.130.28.68 behaviour \n\nToday when I woke up, I found a whole lot of personal attacks from anon user 89.130.28.68 against me.\n\nMessages such as:\n\"\"THIS USER IS SUCH A STUPID AND BIASED WIKIPEDIA EDITOR. SHOULD BE BANNED FOREVER!\"\" on my user page.\nA blanking of my talk-page whith the following message \"\"buaagh i'm sick only reading this user please..remove him from wiki!!!!\"\".\n\"\"that is fucking stupid and haves no sense!!!! That is a person with various nationalities NOT A NATIONALITY OF SPAIN . ONLY MAURICE27 CAN SAY THAT!\"\" in the Nationalities of Spain article.\n\"\"WTF!!! IS NOT POSSIBLE THAT MAURICE27 IS STILL EDITING THIS ARTICLE FROM A SUCH BIASED AND STUPID POV!!!!!!\"\" in the Catalonia article. (NOTICE that I hadn't edit that article since January 17, 2009\n\nI ask you if you can do anything to stop this kind of behaviour with a ban from a user who has been attacking me since April 2, 2007 and who I'm pretty sure is a sockpuppet from ). \"", - "id": "93" - }, - "94": { - "label": true, - "text": "fuckAN MORONS\n\nSTOP CHANGAN THE PAGES\n\nOR I AM TWIST OFF YOURE LITTAL PEE-WEES", - "id": "94" - }, - "95": { - "label": true, - "text": "\"\n\nItaly???? Rome???? What the fuck has this got to do with anything we are talking about? You serbo-nationalists wanna go on your Italy page and discuss that. Evlekis, are you able to read??? Look at the following:\n\n\"\"An excellent scholarly contribution to the study of the province. . . . Seriously differs from the biased interpretations published by Serbian and Albanian historians, or trendy but shallow Western \"\"Kosovology experts.\"\"\n\u2014Canadian Slavonic Papers\n\n\"\"A thrilling detective story.\"\"\nNew York Times Book Review\n\n\"\"Excellent.\"\"\nNew York Review of Books\n\n\"\"A book every policy expert, journalist and lay person must read.\"\"\nWall Street Journal\n\n\"\"Malcolm's narrative is gripping, even brilliant at times ... He takes to his task with the vigor of a detective driven by true passion. At times his claims are, in terms of Balkan history, quite revolutionary.\"\"\nEconomist\n\n\"\"Cover(s) the whole history of Kosovo, with an authority that is often breathtaking and never oppressive.\"\"\nSunday Times\n\n\"\"Brilliantly researched and argued ... a magisterial work of history ... Kosovo will inevitably be received immediately as an immensely valuable contribution to our understanding and knowledge of a contemporary crisis. But to see the book as merely a contribution to the present-day debate is to do it a disservice. This is a profound and pioneering work which will endure for generations.\"\"\nTimes Literary Supplement\n\nIn this awe-inspiring work, Malcolm has created a vital successor to his Bosnia: A Short History and an essential aid to anyone who wishes to understand this tragic region today...His book is exceptional not only for his unimpeachable rearch, but also for his equitable examination of the conflicting ethnic views of what really happened ... One can't help speculating on how a clear understanding of the information contained here might have affected the Dayton Accord and history.\nPublisher's Weekly, 4/20/98\n\nBy far the best available guide to the fatal steps to catastrophe.\nThe New York Review of Books\n\n\"\". . .elaborately researched . . .\"\"\nBook World\n\nThere you have it. Noel Malcolm is revered and aknowledged as a neutral and impartial historian. But just because he isn't on of your Serbo-bloggers, you come up with all this shit about his works. When he says \"\"conquered\"\", that is exactly what the term means. Your map is shit. Because Serbs ONLY MADE UP 25% of that land whether it was a bigger or smaller Kosova than today. And I call it KOSOVA because KOSOVA is it's name. It's Serbo-nationalists like you, Dab, and Balkanfever who keep it in it's Milosevic devized name. And you keep going on about the Treaty in London 1913. Well???? What happened???? Certainly nothing to do with Kosova joining Serbia because I said before and I'll say again - if it did, Malcolm would have said it. If he gets things wrong, why is he so well respected by all those reporters in the newspapers listed by Interestedinfairness. Answer that one. Dab, don't confuse the issue. It doesn't matter if Kosova was once it Italy, I tell you that it has never been in Serbia, it only had the bad luck to be in the same \"\"genocide state\"\" as Serbia when a part of Yugoslavia. The end. \"", - "id": "95" - }, - "96": { - "label": true, - "text": "I feel sorry for you, small penised foreign dog! Defending absolute scum like Mao, Jiang, and Deng ensures you are a brainwashed fag lost in China's past.\n\nIt will take 200 years before Chinese people from the Mainland become clean, respectable, wise human beings.\n\nRight now they are money worshipping slaves whose minds are lost to propaganda and distorted logic.\n\nHow sad! Such a great civilization destroyed by a band of gangsters!", - "id": "96" - }, - "97": { - "label": true, - "text": "YOU ARE A PRICK \n\nASSHOLE", - "id": "97" - }, - "98": { - "label": true, - "text": "WIKIPEDIA SUCKS \n\nWIKIPEDIA SUCKS WEENIES", - "id": "98" - }, - "99": { - "label": true, - "text": "HEY I ASKED YOU A QUESTION AND YOU STILL HAVENT RESPONDED TO IT YET11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 \n\nSUCK MY FUCKING BALLS YOU FUCKING ASSHOLES72.191.164.67 MRIVERA25", - "id": "99" - }, - "100": { - "label": true, - "text": "\"Read \"\"Powers of Horror\"\" and tell me she isnt an anti-semite. Now stop fucking editing my god damn edits. Just because its true and cited does not give you the right to protect her.\n\n\"", - "id": "100" - }, - "101": { - "label": true, - "text": "king of the world and we will eat a dick", - "id": "101" - }, - "102": { - "label": true, - "text": "\"\nWhat a pile of shit. You completely ignore a massive violation of WB:BLPCRIME while you go on holiday. You, Wales, are one special piece of shit. Magnotta's prospective defence team are having wet dreams about wikipedia. There can be no fair trial given the article you have approved.You are a fucking idiot. When politicians come calling at your door complaining at {{WP:BLP]], you collapse like a wet kleenex in a mild breeze. You should be ashamed of yourself. But perhaps it is more important to you that people like Malleus are pursued for calling cunts \"\"cunts\"\". If you allow this massive violation of WP:BLPCRIME to pass, then you are patently a media-whoring cunt yourself. This stinks, Wales. You stink, by association. Fuck you and your warped concept of an \"\"encyclopedia\"\". Chan \"", - "id": "102" - }, - "103": { - "label": true, - "text": "Hey, douche \n\nI'm back! Hahaha, this is gonna be fun!", - "id": "103" - }, - "104": { - "label": true, - "text": "fuck you, whores!!! I'LL FUCK YOU UP OLD-STYLE, MOTHERFUCKING TRANNYBANGERS CUNTS!", - "id": "104" - }, - "105": { - "label": true, - "text": "how dear you who ever put on hi shit haeds i my going to sue the peo[ple who made this web sit \n\nP.S Just jocking i culdn't care less if or diidn't have hi shit heads", - "id": "105" - }, - "106": { - "label": true, - "text": "Hahaha, you dont actually believe this bullshit you are telling me right now? You are talking about the access to the country or representatives to the government, not Kim Jong Un himself. Those are two totally different things (although I could understand your stupidity, since North Koreans think that Kim Jong un is the governement, im just saying). Go Troll somewhere else kid.", - "id": "106" - }, - "107": { - "label": true, - "text": "Bold textYPU GUYS FUCKEN SUCK!!!", - "id": "107" - }, - "108": { - "label": true, - "text": "Vandalism, douching, and faggotry are not tolerated on this website.", - "id": "108" - }, - "109": { - "label": true, - "text": "\"\n\n Love Hina part:3 \n\nDamm you and your auto archiving!:p\n\nDamm vandal struck again so I've left a message for Sephiroth Bcr rather then leave a message on the general board. They even removed my reference this time *angry*. Anyway, haven't done the characters yet, but what do you think of the media additions? I've only done the major works so far, there is still loads missing (color version of the manga, anime \"\"manga\"\", characters cd's etc) \"", - "id": "109" - }, - "110": { - "label": true, - "text": "Consider myself lucky??? Oh get your head out of your anus. This is wikipedia. You obviously dedicate your life to making sure that someone doesnt have a joke. No one is harmed, I apologised, and you're obviously a BLS (border line spastic) and it WAS an apology, no question about it. Go fuck yourself, you arrogant sad little vagina.", - "id": "110" - }, - "111": { - "label": true, - "text": "All my answers were given, i am not banned on boxrec, and i found out their wiki is not part of this wiki, i reject all your claims, you are full of shit and garbage and so on, and you do not deserve the honor and dignity of wasting my time and giving your court reply bs accusations and i have no time like you, no i am not gone! I have evidence you were banded, now you want to blame it on others you low life!", - "id": "111" - }, - "112": { - "label": true, - "text": "\"\n\"\"Families, couples and individuals are welcome to visit the club.\"\" This kind of shit still lingers in the article: such an edit is exactly what I did not want. I could have done that myself, fer fuck's sake. I would bitch more, but I'm a lazy bastard. However, TALK PAGES EXIST FOR A FUCKING REASON. I'm not angry\u2014just manic. Graah. \"", - "id": "112" - }, - "113": { - "label": true, - "text": "Way out of line? \n\nOut of line? Am I your subordinate? Do I exist only to be controlled by bigots like you? Right-wing prat", - "id": "113" - }, - "114": { - "label": true, - "text": "Hey Roy. Go fukk yourself you gay bich.\n\nYa u heard me. \n\nPussy", - "id": "114" - }, - "115": { - "label": true, - "text": "DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU U CUNT DAMN YOU", - "id": "115" - }, - "116": { - "label": true, - "text": "At what point is your approval required for anything? Kindly fuck off, thanks.", - "id": "116" - }, - "117": { - "label": true, - "text": "Stop screwing with my edits, copyright is for fools!", - "id": "117" - }, - "118": { - "label": true, - "text": "like wtf \n\nlook man, youre a graduate student in mathematical fucking ecology and you have pictures of amoebas on your homepage. dont you have anything better to do? you have a job? what can you do as a mathematical ecologist? what the FUCK do you want to do with your life???? GET OFF WIKIPEDIA YOU FUCKING DEAD BEAT! jesus H. christ! go get a girlfriend or something, or get an interesting job, or at the least, go play some donkey kong or something. my god. you sicken me you sad sack little fuck. oh and TEA DRINKER????? you drink tea!? i like tea too man, but not THAT much. you are a giant COCK SUCKER. get a life dude.\n\nsincerely,\n the real N-town gangsta\n\np.s.- youre a faggot", - "id": "118" - }, - "119": { - "label": true, - "text": "I swear to GOD u republican TOOLBAG\nIf I ever see you in life, i'd fucking hurt you\nU are totally 100% corporation, Tea Party, Anti-Gay, Anti-Abortion, Anti-Black, Anti-Hispanic, Anti-Immigrant, \nYou are like a radio that spews out Rush Limbaugh 24/7. You need to be stopped. U will never know the pain that us\npoor democrats, blacks, and disabled go throw unless you die and get sent to HELL (u do believe in it right u Christian\nFundamentalist) \nLearn some progressive shit dude, get out of ur fucking parents church. People Like you are what led to the incompetent PResident George W Bush invading Iraq. But wait u probably supported invading iraq instead of Pakistant or Iran. Get a life or seriously DIE caus u'd be doing us all a great favor.", - "id": "119" - }, - "120": { - "label": true, - "text": "Mine dispeared, somebody wax my ass.", - "id": "120" - }, - "121": { - "label": true, - "text": "is fucking dumd i hope someone kills him", - "id": "121" - }, - "122": { - "label": true, - "text": "Zomfg.. You ppl make me laugh.. HA HA HA.. jeezus.. GoD You people need to get a social life, I mean COME ON PEOPLE. Ask yourself this, Are You a potiental re-re or just a full blown retard?!?! And Wishes? Whats this crap about WISHES??? Hes not in the Farking ground [NOT DEAD YOU STUPID IDOIT]XD!!!!!-Robohacker666 [Comin' throu the wall is real F**kin' cool! YOU GLASS BITCH!] >:]", - "id": "122" - }, - "123": { - "label": true, - "text": "this user needs to get a life lol \n\nlol get a real life u suck lol", - "id": "123" - }, - "124": { - "label": true, - "text": "you're a dick also \n\nhow can you say jonathan pacheco shouldn't have a biography? you call yourself lucky 6.9 but i think lucky 6.5 is more appropriate...YOU'VE BEEN DOWNGRADED...SNAP BITCH!BUUUUUUUUUUURN!", - "id": "124" - }, - "125": { - "label": true, - "text": "^ you are a dick whom is not notable and apparantly crawl wiki looking for ways to feed your narrisisim and hubris by proving important people not notable.", - "id": "125" - }, - "126": { - "label": true, - "text": "I can't believe Wiki is stupid enough as to make this faggot an admin.", - "id": "126" - }, - "127": { - "label": true, - "text": "You\n\nAre a tattletale. Douchebag.", - "id": "127" - }, - "128": { - "label": true, - "text": "My Edits \n\nQuit fucking with my edits you stupid Awbern shit eatin' sonofabitch!", - "id": "128" - }, - "129": { - "label": true, - "text": "RE: Moving Dragon Slayer to Dragon Slayer series \nFuck Your Mother! You is Son of a Bitch!", - "id": "129" - }, - "130": { - "label": true, - "text": "You can't warnings you moron! Now leave the page alone you fool.", - "id": "130" - }, - "131": { - "label": true, - "text": "this also ponders my imagination \n\ni say FUCK IT! FUCK SPLITTING THIS FUCKEDY ARTICLE. we'eve already fucked up this article and we do not need to fuck it anymore. please save any more fuck from happening.\n\nsincerely, a little fucker oh yeah bitch dats my cock right there, you know ma cock looks nice", - "id": "131" - }, - "132": { - "label": true, - "text": "\"\n\n\"\"And, um, your links point to Rushton and Lynn...you do realise that their work is widely dismissed as racist, right?\"\"\nWhat a stupid little PC brainwashed man you are. 220.126.1.93 \"", - "id": "132" - }, - "133": { - "label": true, - "text": "HI JohnHistory\n\nYes, you will be blocked and your thoughtful post here deleted by someone like Tarc. The main thing to realize is that Wikipedia has always been, and will always be, a clusterfuck. If you're interested in finding out detailed histories of the lives of anime characters, it's a start, but other than that, it's virtual pages are only good for wiping virtual shit out of your virtual asshole. This place attracts the worst kind of assholes, and it's hard to trust in the good faith of something from which nothing but shit and hot air spews forth. They decide what a proper source is, they decide what's been discussed in the media, just like they decide which place in SF has the best glory holes. Any type of internet arrangement with a hierarchy attracts the worst type of vaginal discharge. Wikipedia's political content is governed by a bunch of aborted leftists who read a couple of pages of Das Kapital, decided it was nice and then put it down. They are a bunch of fucking cocksuckers, literally and figuratively.", - "id": "133" - }, - "134": { - "label": true, - "text": "terrorist \n\nYou seem like a terrorist sir. Are you penises as small as they say they are? I have corroborated it with a cite something you never bothered to do. You may keep your comments about drones as long as you cite it even though it has no place on this page. In turn please don't remove what I have written about the sectarian nature of conflict. \n\nAnd why do all Muslims ruin Akbars good name with your Allah o Akbar crap. He was a good king and you should not sully his image.", - "id": "134" - }, - "135": { - "label": true, - "text": "ASSHOLE \n\nYOU FUCKING ASSHOLE I HATE YOU YOU SUCK WHY THE FUCK DID YOU EDIT MY PAGE YOU FUCKING FATTY GEEK HOBO LIVING IN YOUR MOMS HOUSE YOU LAZY WHORE.\nI JUST WANT TO HAVE FUN YOU STUPID SHIT WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU", - "id": "135" - }, - "136": { - "label": true, - "text": "72.94.188.92 \n\nYo what the fuck is your problem fucking around with my page! leave it the fuck alone!", - "id": "136" - }, - "137": { - "label": true, - "text": "nigger paedophile nigger paedophile", - "id": "137" - }, - "138": { - "label": true, - "text": "eyesnore \n\nfuck me hard eyesnore", - "id": "138" - }, - "139": { - "label": true, - "text": "I dont care about kurds actually (i am neutral to them) but i dont want Turkey depicted as some backward ass third world shitehole that your trying to make it look like. I will do anything to stop it. Delete my messages to your pathetic heart's delight, but you cant stop me emailing every single kurdish editor on this page about your sadass additions which not only bash turkey but also lay the blame on kurds", - "id": "139" - }, - "140": { - "label": true, - "text": "\"\n\nDear Jesus. Really, has Vander Plaats really become the Lt Gov man? We gotta deal with \"\"why Republicans like Jaysuschris hate the Ten Commandments (and love right wing sluts like Karen Nussle)\"\" Republicans. I think Jaysuschris is female, and probably, a Lesbian.\"", - "id": "140" - }, - "141": { - "label": true, - "text": "No, I know where he was buried. Close to the Kremlin. I shitted all over his grave.\n\nAnyone know where his ancestors are buried? I would like to dig up their graves too?", - "id": "141" - }, - "142": { - "label": true, - "text": "Alright I appreciate your polite manner. However, placing all that crap on my page agitated me.Now, all I wish is for all that crud to be removed. and I request some sort of warning on Dave Scherer's page, warning people that his shithole shit has spyware on it.", - "id": "142" - }, - "143": { - "label": true, - "text": "Fuck off! If you can't give a valid reason for your revert then be banned!!! 86.32.178.163", - "id": "143" - }, - "144": { - "label": true, - "text": "You are a worthless piece of shit. You must also be a knob-gobbler.", - "id": "144" - }, - "145": { - "label": true, - "text": "mothafucka! \n\nYou son of a bitch, shup up!\n\notherwise I will kill you!", - "id": "145" - }, - "146": { - "label": true, - "text": "\"Excellent work there Shii. We can't have his kind getting us to think about what the Maya actually say about their own prophecies. We insulted him, offended him and abused him and he just had to be ethical and persistant. BLOCK those Mother Fukkers!!! Taking out the entire Santa Fe Public Library system is a great preemptive strike also. There may be others of his kind, that sympathize with those \"\"Indians\"\". These people actually LOVE the Earth and that is without reliable sources! We kicked their asses and have the right to write THEIR history and interpret THEIR sacred teachings however we please. We need more from college students who have been indoctrinated in the Church of Academia. That piece by Stitler is one of the most exaggerated and opinionated and so yeah, use that as the title of the page! And by all means give John MAJOR Jenkins his own section. Not a single scholar or Mayanists agrees with his appropriated theory and this kind of hypocrisy and arrogance is what Wiki is all about. We can get away with it, by continuing to use our power to censor free thinkers like Mardyks and his kind. Sony Pictures is paying us all off with tickets, so let us know how many you want. FREE popcorn, too! Whoopee! Best wishes from Jimini Cricket 97.123.26.228 \n\n\"", - "id": "146" - }, - "147": { - "label": true, - "text": "Wha's a reliable source mike? Something that comes out your ma's cunt when she's breast feeding you? You wanker.", - "id": "147" - }, - "148": { - "label": true, - "text": "December 2013\nHey motherfucker...only I uploaded the image at Dhoom 3 and then u want to take the credit....if i want, i will upload the same image 100 times, who are you to command me cocksucker? And does Wikipedia belong to your father?? Go to bloody hell asshole...", - "id": "148" - }, - "149": { - "label": true, - "text": "Do it Our Way (Play) \n\nBruv... fuck off, I bought the flat, back in January and I've only edited on here as I see fit, so I dunno how I've abused multiple accounts and I don't think you're an idiot, I know you are a 24 carat idiot, look at the edit history on Do it Our Way it originally said it was R&B;/pop so if you don't believe me, you got eyes use 'em and I'll expect an apology! 86.182.64.127", - "id": "149" - }, - "150": { - "label": true, - "text": "How dare you send me such abuse you fucking cockmaster!\nIf you dare warn me again, Mr Jeff. I will savagely attack your mother!\n\nI know where you live", - "id": "150" - }, - "151": { - "label": true, - "text": "UFC 191 \n\nTHIS IS THE FINALIZED BOUT ORDER, DUMBASS. IT'S NOT GONNA CHANGE TO WHAT YOU WANT: http://i.imgur.com/1MBbOZU.jpg", - "id": "151" - }, - "152": { - "label": true, - "text": "Hey i know that im just a city boy but this page was written by a bunch of dumbass redneck fuckers who worship beer and have talking bass mouunted on every wall i fucking hate rednecks and all there woodsport shit these fuckers need to get a life and learn how to use their right hand...do rednecks ever have sex with people other than their own family members?", - "id": "152" - }, - "153": { - "label": true, - "text": "Cunt Editing \n\nYou should be added to the list I was creating, ergo you are a cunt.", - "id": "153" - }, - "154": { - "label": true, - "text": "\"\n\n Controversial Remarks Alleged Calling Facebook Users \"\"Dumb F**ks\"\" \n\nQuote: To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. \n\n!!!!THAT IS WHAT I AM DOING!!!!\n\nREFRAIN FROM DELETING THE TALK PAGE CONTRIBUTION WITHOUT PROVIDING A VALID REASON OR BETTER TIPS FOR IMPROVEMENT. AFTER ALL THIS IS ONLY THE TALK PAGE\n\nsources for the below mentioned contribution:\n\n http://www.forbes.com/sites/andygreenberg/2012/02/01/is-zuckerbergs-the-hacker-way-letter-facebooks-dont-be-evil-and-will-it-live-up-to-it/\n http://gawker.com/5636765/facebook-ceo-admits-to-calling-users-dumb-fucks\n http://au.businessinsider.com/well-these-new-zuckerberg-ims-wont-help-facebooks-privacy-problems-2010-5\n http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/05/14/facebook_trust_dumb/\n http://www.theweek.co.uk/technology/14625/are-users-%E2%80%98dumb-fucks%E2%80%99-trusting-data-facebook\n http://tdh.me/zuckerberg-called-early-facebook-users-dumb-fucks-so-what/\n http://anphicle.com/en/they-trust-me-dumb-fucks-facebook-ceo-mark-zuckerberg/\n http://www.tomsguide.com/us/Facebook-Mark-Zuckerberg-Social-Networking-privacy-security,news-6794.html\n http://au.businessinsider.com/embarrassing-and-damaging-zuckerberg-ims-confirmed-by-zuckerberg-the-new-yorker-2010-9\n\nOther sections on Wikipedia where Controversial Remarks is valid: \n\n Bryant Gumbel (section Controversial remarks)\n Mel Gibson (section Controversial remarks)\n Sherrod Brown (section Controversial remarks)\n Kent Hovind (section Controversial remarks)\n Venkaiah Naidu (section Controversial Remarks)\n Greg Gutfeld (section Controversial remarks)\n Lawrence Cannon (section Controversial remarks)\n Daniel Bernard (diplomat) (section Controversial remark)\n James R. Flynn (section Controversial remarks)\n\nand many many more\n\nstart.\n\nWhile at Harvard College 19-year-old Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg allegedly used login data from his social network to hack into fellow students email accounts; that evidence also included instant message transcripts where he calls facebook users \"\"dumb fucks\"\". The alleged following exchange is between a 19-year-old Mark Zuckerberg and a friend shortly after Mark launched The Facebook in his dorm room:\n \nZuck: Yeah so if you ever need info about anyone at Harvard\n\nZuck: Just ask.\n\nZuck: I have over 4,000 emails, pictures, addresses, SNS\n\n[Redacted Friend's Name]: What? How'd you manage that one?\n\nZuck: People just submitted it.\n\nZuck: I don't know why.\n\nZuck: They \"\"trust me\"\"\n\nZuck: Dumb fucks.\n\nIn another instant message (IM)\n\nFRIEND: so have you decided what you are going to do about the websites?\n\nZUCK: yea i\u2019m going to fuck them\n\nZUCK: probably in the year\n\nZUCK: *ear\n\nend.\"", - "id": "154" - }, - "155": { - "label": true, - "text": "stop it you crack whore \n\nGo die in a fire, you dick sucking fag. 128.61.19.93", - "id": "155" - }, - "156": { - "label": true, - "text": "\"\n\n Some bubble tea for you! \n\n thanks ass hole \"", - "id": "156" - }, - "157": { - "label": true, - "text": "Response \n\nYOU ARE LYING AND SLANDERING MY NAME! YOU ARE RACIST AND YOUR BIAS SLURS AND harrassment. I did not vandalize a page you IDIOT PIECE OF SHIT", - "id": "157" - }, - "158": { - "label": true, - "text": "Pukata Dishoom! Bi-polar Ass-Low-class S.O.B", - "id": "158" - }, - "159": { - "label": true, - "text": "Oh! I found out what his knickers are in a not about, Kev said 'fuck off idiot' in his edit summary to his first defacement of our talk page! ROFLMAO! That's brilliant, nice work Kev, making friends already. P Please make friends with the LESS crazy type of wiki-fascist PLEASE? xAidenx", - "id": "159" - }, - "160": { - "label": true, - "text": "AHS TO SAY! I DON'T CARE IF YOUR A MODERATOR A MEMBER OR THE FUCKINGL ORD JESUS CHRIST HIMSELF! I MAKE MY OWN DESCISIONS AND DO WHAT I WANT WHEN I WANT! AND NO ONE IS GOING TO STOP ME!", - "id": "160" - }, - "161": { - "label": true, - "text": "Craig Newmark\n\nCraig Newmark is a Kike, fuckhead!", - "id": "161" - }, - "162": { - "label": true, - "text": "FUCK \nYou little bitch the cowboys have no testes", - "id": "162" - }, - "163": { - "label": true, - "text": "i luv MY CHEMICAL ROMANCE!!!!!! I DONT GIVE A FLYIN SHIT ABOUT WHATEVER NE1 ELSE SAYS!!", - "id": "163" - }, - "164": { - "label": true, - "text": "it should be biased against those soulless fuckers", - "id": "164" - }, - "165": { - "label": true, - "text": "\" February 2014 (UTC)\n\nAbsolutely amazing, you're a total criminal, I have seen what you did with my Ayr and Saleban revisions. You're a complete and utter degenerate who actively deleted every single addition of mine on this website then you cry about \"\"personally\"\" attacking you. Well, criminal, for me to attack you, you would need to have some humanity first but you lack that since you're a criminal malefactor. I can't even find a better word to describe you that is synoonymous with CRIMINAL. You think I care about being banned? You must be mentally defiencent to assume I'd care about staying on a website where I can't even post anything. Let me tell you one thing, you can edit the fucking Somali people page and make it all Darood, you can fucking delete every single fucking Hawiye page on here but the current president of Somalia is Hawiye and it will always fucking stay that way, you Darood animals have been limited and contained to the internet where you roam. Go to fucking hell (that's if you don't edit the wiki page for hell and make it into a paradise). Fuck yourself. 17:41, 18\"", - "id": "165" - }, - "166": { - "label": true, - "text": "hey wiki nerd \n\nu suck man i dont like your nasty coments punk ill beat ur guts from the back. signed lover boy. ps i love butt sex and we can have butt sex ill bring the ky gelly", - "id": "166" - }, - "167": { - "label": true, - "text": "something you really really need to get that bug out of your ass.", - "id": "167" - }, - "168": { - "label": true, - "text": "I am going to rape you dead. \n\nIf you revert my changes again I will fucking rape you dead.", - "id": "168" - }, - "169": { - "label": true, - "text": "HELLO \n\nYou disgrace to humanity. Stop wasting valuable Internet resources (your killing the fucking planet) and throw out your PC. PS it's like 3am what the fark kinda life do you have on Wikipedia 24/7. A VERY SAD AND LONELY ONE LOL. Life's too short find something better to do", - "id": "169" - }, - "170": { - "label": true, - "text": "HEY CLOWN..YOUR MEAT PUPPET, Really FUCKED THE DOG on this on \nIs Goethean, your personal enforcer, must have check user for the follow editors.", - "id": "170" - }, - "171": { - "label": true, - "text": "you suck, get a life, get off wikipedia, you are stupid", - "id": "171" - }, - "172": { - "label": true, - "text": "\"\n\n Tamar Braxton \n\nU R retarded!!How can youtube not be a verifiable source. I put a clip of her hitting a D and E one octave above Soprano C(D7 and E7) and you say it's not a good source? What is then! I bet if I even got a video of her hitting whistle notes you'd say it wasn't verifiable. Of course it it. if you see or hear her hitting a whistle note, then she's a whistle registre singer. The same applies to all whsitle register singers!!!! U R just stupid!!!!! U and Mr. \"\"I'll bring the food\"\" who totally destroyed the Whsitle register singers category.\"", - "id": "172" - }, - "173": { - "label": true, - "text": "\"\n\nFelonious Monk, you can kiss my hairy Jewish ass! If your nose wasn't burried so deep in Chip Berlet's nut sack then you might actually have a bit of a sense of hummor and not be all anal about your precious Wiki-beuracracy. Go ahead and block my IP if you like, I really don't give a shit about you or Wikipedia. I can switch my IP address in two seconds anyhow. Or block my IP-range if you like - I fuckin dare you to! I'm switching internet providers tomorrow anyway, so it won't affect me, it will just keep a bunch of other people from editing your wannabe \"\"encyclopedia,\"\" which is A-OK with me! \"", - "id": "173" - }, - "174": { - "label": true, - "text": "ya mum \n\nfucks ya", - "id": "174" - }, - "175": { - "label": true, - "text": "hello moto \n\nhello flygayguy649 i hope u get a dick stuck up your ass i am a 13 year old kkk member. and i'll kick your ass so stay away and dont delete my pages. BITCH!!!", - "id": "175" - }, - "176": { - "label": true, - "text": "Archivesyou have a message re your last change, go fuckyourself!!!", - "id": "176" - }, - "177": { - "label": true, - "text": "\"\n\n You Suck \n\nIf you don't undelete the page \"\"Barry Dejay\"\" I will %$#@ you!\"", - "id": "177" - }, - "178": { - "label": true, - "text": "OMICRONPERSEI SUCKS GWERNOL'S VAGINA DAILY.", - "id": "178" - }, - "179": { - "label": true, - "text": "Its harder than you think bithches", - "id": "179" - }, - "180": { - "label": true, - "text": "Irresponsible dumheads. Each and every image has fair use rationale and appropriate copyright clarifications. Shitheads like you do not deserve any dialogue. 71.184.9.231", - "id": "180" - }, - "181": { - "label": true, - "text": "I can change my IP at will asshole.", - "id": "181" - }, - "182": { - "label": true, - "text": "http://www.cnn.com/2009/CRIME/02/18/barracks.death/ There. Don't know how you mised this in the news. I don't know how to do any of this citation crap, either. I don't have enough time to spend all day chained to a computer learning haxx0ring or whatever it is you nerds do all day in your parent's basement. And it's notable because it happened on the base and is becoming quite a big scandal. This should be obvious on the surface, idiot.", - "id": "182" - }, - "183": { - "label": true, - "text": "jam your message up your arse wikipedia dickhead", - "id": "183" - }, - "184": { - "label": true, - "text": "Its fucking assholes like you who vandalize wikipedia that really grind my gears. Where the fuck do you get off? Huh? Huh? You think this is funny don't you? Well I sacrificed a career and a marriage to keep unconstructive pigs like you from ruining a good thing like Wikipedia; and if I ever get to see my kids again I know they'll thank me for this. You sir are a prick. And what kind of fucking name is 99.135.144.18 anyway? Oh and your user page sucks noob. 24.61.195.2 \n\nP.S. You personally, and not your ip are forever banned from Wikipedia", - "id": "184" - }, - "185": { - "label": true, - "text": "by the way I AM A FUCKIN FAG FUCK U", - "id": "185" - }, - "186": { - "label": true, - "text": "http://twitter.com/phoenixreporter - HACK THIS FUCKER'S ACCOUNT AND ALSO FIND AND KILL User:Zhanzhao !!! FUCK HIS FAMILY AND HIS GIRLFRIEND!!! WAHAHAHA", - "id": "186" - }, - "187": { - "label": true, - "text": "\"\ntry these important things and maybe you won't be such a sucker motherfucker:\n\n1. Learn how to spell. If things remain as they are, everyone is bound to consider you to be the ignorant lame-brained cult member you are.\n\n2. Revert your attacks on Van Tucky on the talk pages. You come off as a vicious, vile psychopath. If you ever set your cult defending ass in a court of law, the jury would see through your charade in heartbeat.\n\n3. Stop playing good cop- bad cop with your fucking retarded Dahn hack Forestgarden\n\n4. Accept all Korean language sources you stupid bitch!! How dare you try to stifle and censor articles in the name of your fucked up cult. Your Forestgarden bitch believes its within Wiki policy to include Korean language articles when reporting on favorable aspects of your bitch master. Why don't you include all the other more negative portrayals in the Korean language. Also, who said this Itsahappyday fuckhead deserves to translate any Korean? This should all be disputed, you fucking racist, neo-nazi reject?\n\n5. Stop using the word cynical to describe your \"\"enemies.\"\" You come off even more retarded than your Ilchee bitch master. Your philosophical maturity is less than that of a first grader. The world is \"\"cynical.\"\" Those who don't believe in Dahn are \"\"cynical.\"\" I can't wait until South Park makes an episode about your bitch cult. \n\n6. Are you fucking insane? Korea is the center of the universe? Korea as a cultural hub? Korea the place where the next messiah appears? You Dahn people never cease to amaze when it comes to your thought processes. Korea is not what your Ilchee bitch believes it to be. Think about it retard- the fucking nation of Palau has more of a right to talk about religious heritage than the fucking hermit kingdom. How can you be so retarded, that you choose a Korean cult? If you chose a Chinese or Indian one, at least it would show you have some portion of a brain. Coming to Korea and joining a Korean cult with Korea-centric views is more retarded than travelling to Antartica in search of good coffee while visiting Columbia in search of ice and snow.\n\n7. One more time: the philosophical underpinnings of your shit cult are so flimsy I must question your intelligence.\n\n8. Nicola Cola...what kind of bitch ass name is that? what is wrong with you?\n\nAnd you wonder why you need to join a fucked up cult to find friendship and loving. Dumb fuck!!!!!!\"", - "id": "187" - }, - "188": { - "label": true, - "text": "FUck you you god damn mother fuckin son of a bitch stop being a stupid ass shithead and be fuckin cool for once", - "id": "188" - }, - "189": { - "label": true, - "text": "Jetstreamer: you can go and fuck yourself you stupid sick bastard homo!", - "id": "189" - }, - "190": { - "label": true, - "text": "Ignore him, Scientizzle is just an asshole.", - "id": "190" - }, - "191": { - "label": true, - "text": "Where do you get off deleting that? it took me ages to do and you jus come and delete it, all the while leaving your shitty MTV bollox up, you fucking Americans are nothing but a bunch of fucking hicks. Your presidents a fucking redneck hick and I cant wait to see the day when that bastard gets a nuke up his arse!!!", - "id": "191" - }, - "192": { - "label": true, - "text": "\"\n\n A kitten for you! \n\njust becuz ur pussy 4 lying.\n\n \n\"", - "id": "192" - }, - "193": { - "label": true, - "text": "WHY DID YUO BLOCK ME????2\n\nUser talk:24.63.62.169\n\nALL I ADDED WAS A FUCKING BREAK\n\nIS THERE A WIKIPEDIA RULE AGAINST ADDING BREAKS TO PAGES\n\nWHAT THE FUCK", - "id": "193" - }, - "194": { - "label": true, - "text": "\"\n\n Hey \n\nFirst, it's between me and idiot, so please don't get involved, ok?\n\nI had added information to the Snopes article that I not only verified but then provided information on the talk page on how to do so. Instead of checking the talk page though, lazy idiot just hits revert and goes back to eating chips off his/her chest.\n\nUnfortunately that seems to be all too common around here - I've read countless \"\"bitching sessions\"\" posted by other people added constructive and meaningful information, only to have some lazy jerk remove it on a whim without even bothering to see what it was.\n\n99.139.224.87 \"", - "id": "194" - }, - "195": { - "label": true, - "text": "What the fuck? \n\nCluebot NG is in your house... does that?", - "id": "195" - }, - "196": { - "label": true, - "text": "Take this how you will, but you suck Big Black Donkey Balls", - "id": "196" - }, - "197": { - "label": true, - "text": "Its time to pay back \n\nyou are an asshole an asshole and yet again an asshole\ntotal idiot you are a real piece of shit", - "id": "197" - }, - "198": { - "label": true, - "text": "MUHAMMAD WAS A MURDERER, RAPIST, THIEF, SLAVE TRADER, WARMONGER AND DIRTY PEDOPHILE\n\nISLAM = NAZI", - "id": "198" - }, - "199": { - "label": true, - "text": "Im sorry are you fucking stupid that nice person just gave me a warning then you fucking block me, nigger cunt eat pussy bitch", - "id": "199" - }, - "200": { - "label": true, - "text": "\"\nIn 1930, Balbo also did not fly into St. Petersburg, Mumbai or Ho Chi Minh City, because those cities were not called that in 1930 either.\nIf Balbo had flown in 1990, he would have flown into Derry, per your petty policy. (What sort of city needs a stupid policy like this, he asked rhetorically.) Ok? Have you got it now?\nBut this is not 1990, it's 1930.\nIf you don't understand the difference, why are you \"\"working\"\" on an encyclopedia?\nEh? Eh?\nQuit wasting my time with this bullshit.\nBullshit is what you are pushing. Bullshit.\nGot it? Jesus H. Christ. \"", - "id": "200" - }, - "201": { - "label": true, - "text": "Can't sleep, clown will eat me, go fuck yourself you piece of hog anus.", - "id": "201" - }, - "202": { - "label": true, - "text": "her!\n\nPoop, pee, toot, fart, gas, diareah!\n\nZoey is poop. She stinks.\n\nI want to marry you baby! Call me!", - "id": "202" - }, - "203": { - "label": true, - "text": "WOULDN'T BE THE FIRST TIME BITCH. FUCK YOU I'LL FIND OUT WHERE YOU LIVE, SODOMIZE YOUR WIFE AND THEN BURN YOUR HOUSE DOWN. FUCK YOU YOU FUCKING QUEER.", - "id": "203" - }, - "204": { - "label": true, - "text": "FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU \n\nFFFFFFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUCCCCCCCCCCCCCCKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYOOOOOOOOOOOOOUUUUUUUUU!!!!!!!!!!", - "id": "204" - }, - "205": { - "label": true, - "text": "Waggers is a dumb fuck", - "id": "205" - }, - "206": { - "label": true, - "text": "dogs fucked the pope \n\nWHARRRBL GRRRBL", - "id": "206" - }, - "207": { - "label": true, - "text": "And THIS is why you don't list highly speculative ones! I was simply referring to the common-frickin-sense category of actors. Apparently, common sense you lack. Tch, fuck's sake. This is why people don't take Wikipedia seriously. Professionalism? Professionalism my ass. You cunts are the direct opposite of it.", - "id": "207" - }, - "208": { - "label": true, - "text": "What the fuck are u talking about?", - "id": "208" - }, - "209": { - "label": true, - "text": "Suck my greasy dick, I will start creating thousands of pages using different names and you can eat the corn out of my shit if you like. I can create far more than you can ever delete. I will use various screennames, various site titles, and all so don't fuck with me you split lip bitch.", - "id": "209" - }, - "210": { - "label": true, - "text": "\"\nAnyone who looks into this is going to see your harassment, especially the comment you left on my talk page: \"\"Over the past couple of days you've been a real PAIN in the ASS.\"\"\nIn the words of a fine Canadian, \"\"Southern man, better keep your head. Don't forget what your good book says\"\". \"", - "id": "210" - }, - "211": { - "label": true, - "text": "Bullshit \n\nWilliam Penn used the phrase too. I think this is a very biased article.", - "id": "211" - }, - "212": { - "label": true, - "text": "Go fuck yourself Gavin! Go fuck yourself Ryan I bet you double teamed her before you blew into each other's mouths!", - "id": "212" - }, - "213": { - "label": true, - "text": "If \nyou fucking message me again I'm going to kill your fucking family. First I'll make sure they see all of the evil that is in human beings just so they understand that they have no choice but this, then I'll cause them such incredible pain that they will pray for razors on their eyeballs. Then I'll come to you after you have watched this. I will literally peel the skin from you and then go on to the viscera, bit by bit all the way to the bone. You will be alive for the entire time as I'll do limb by limb and cauterise as I go. You will finally reach death when I slowly introduce salt via drip directly into your heart. It's very painful, trust me.", - "id": "213" - }, - "214": { - "label": true, - "text": "I had enough of *you*, bastard.", - "id": "214" - }, - "215": { - "label": true, - "text": "\"\n\nOhh, I didn't thought that situation is that bad you being gay. I'm sorry for you fagg.\n \u2014Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.68.45.58 \"", - "id": "215" - }, - "216": { - "label": true, - "text": "You ignoramus! My cousin just did the hitler pictures and the swastikas and what not. I've been the one talking to you you imbecile. I can't believe that people that are stupid like you exist. It makes we want to start playing russian roulette with myself.", - "id": "216" - }, - "217": { - "label": true, - "text": "User:NHRHS2010 is a homo like mitt romney is. \nUser:NHRHS2010 is a homo like mitt romney is.\n User:Enigmaman is a homo like mitt romney is. \nUser:Enigmaman is a homo like mitt romney is.\n User:NHRHS2010 is a homo like mitt romney is. \nUser:NHRHS2010 is a homo like mitt romney is.\n User:Enigmaman is a homo like mitt romney is. \nUser:Enigmaman is a homo like mitt romney is.== User:NHRHS2010 is a homo like mitt romney is. ==\nUser:NHRHS2010 is a homo like mitt romney is.\n User:Enigmaman is a homo like mitt romney is. \nUser:Enigmaman is a homo like mitt romney is.== User:NHRHS2010 is a homo like mitt romney is. ==\nUser:NHRHS2010 is a homo like mitt romney is.\n User:Enigmaman is a homo like mitt romney is. \nUser:Enigmaman is a homo like mitt romney is.== User:NHRHS2010 is a homo like mitt romney is. ==\nUser:NHRHS2010 is a homo like mitt romney is.\n User:Enigmaman is a homo like mitt romney is. \nUser:Enigmaman is a homo like mitt romney is.== User:NHRHS2010 is a homo like mitt romney is. ==\nUser:NHRHS2010 is a homo like mitt romney is.\n User:Enigmaman is a homo like mitt romney is. \nUser:Enigmaman is a homo like mitt romney is.== User:NHRHS2010 is a homo like mitt romney is. ==\nUser:NHRHS2010 is a homo like mitt romney is.\n User:Enigmaman is a homo like mitt romney is. \nUser:Enigmaman is a homo like mitt romney is.== User:NHRHS2010 is a homo like mitt romney is. ==\nUser:NHRHS2010 is a homo like mitt romney is.\n User:Enigmaman is a homo like mitt romney is. \nUser:Enigmaman is a homo like mitt romney is.== User:NHRHS2010 is a homo like mitt romney is. ==\nUser:NHRHS2010 is a homo like mitt romney is.\n User:Enigmaman is a homo like mitt romney is. \nUser:Enigmaman is a homo like mitt romney is.== User:NHRHS2010 is a homo like mitt romney is. ==\nUser:NHRHS2010 is a homo like mitt romney is.\n User:Enigmaman is a homo like mitt romney is. \nUser:Enigmaman is a homo like mitt romney is.== User:NHRHS2010 is a homo like mitt romney is. ==\nUser:NHRHS2010 is a homo like mitt romney is.\n User:Enigmaman is a homo like mitt romney is. \nUser:Enigmaman is a homo like mitt romney is.== User:NHRHS2010 is a homo like mitt romney is. ==\nUser:NHRHS2010 is a homo like mitt romney is.\n User:Enigmaman is a homo like mitt romney is. \nUser:Enigmaman is a homo like mitt romney is.== User:NHRHS2010 is a homo like mitt romney is. ==\nUser:NHRHS2010 is a homo like mitt romney is.\n User:Enigmaman is a homo like mitt romney is. \nUser:Enigmaman is a homo like mitt romney is.== User:NHRHS2010 is a homo like mitt romney is. ==\nUser:NHRHS2010 is a homo like mitt romney is.\n User:Enigmaman is a homo like mitt romney is. \nUser:Enigmaman is a homo like mitt romney is.== User:NHRHS2010 is a homo like mitt romney is. ==\nUser:NHRHS2010 is a homo like mitt romney is.\n User:Enigmaman is a homo like mitt romney is. \nUser:Enigmaman is a homo like mitt romney is.== User:NHRHS2010 is a homo like mitt romney is. ==\nUser:NHRHS2010 is a homo like mitt romney is.\n User:Enigmaman is a homo like mitt romney is. \nUser:Enigmaman is a homo like mitt romney is.== User:NHRHS2010 is a homo like mitt romney is. ==\nUser:NHRHS2010 is a homo like mitt romney is.\n User:Enigmaman is a homo like mitt romney is. \nUser:Enigmaman is a homo like mitt romney is.== User:NHRHS2010 is a homo like mitt romney is. ==\nUser:NHRHS2010 is a homo like mitt romney is.\n User:Enigmaman is a homo like mitt romney is. \nUser:Enigmaman is a homo like mitt romney is.== User:NHRHS2010 is a homo like mitt romney is. ==\nUser:NHRHS2010 is a homo like mitt romney is.\n User:Enigmaman is a homo like mitt romney is. \nUser:Enigmaman is a homo like mitt romney is.== User:NHRHS2010 is a homo like mitt romney is. ==\nUser:NHRHS2010 is a homo like mitt romney is.\n User:Enigmaman is a homo like mitt romney is. \nUser:Enigmaman is a homo like mitt romney is.== User:NHRHS2010 is a homo like mitt romney is. ==\nUser:NHRHS2010 is a homo like mitt romney is.\n User:Enigmaman is a homo like mitt romney is. \nUser:Enigmaman is a homo like mitt romney is.== User:NHRHS2010 is a homo like mitt romney is. ==\nUser:NHRHS2010 is a homo like mitt romney is.\n User:Enigmaman is a homo like mitt romney is. NEWL", - "id": "217" - }, - "218": { - "label": true, - "text": "fuck god youn shit asshole", - "id": "218" - }, - "219": { - "label": true, - "text": "Man, you are another wikitard aren't you. What pusses.", - "id": "219" - }, - "220": { - "label": true, - "text": "hey\nwhy the fuck is it so hard to get an article on here?", - "id": "220" - }, - "221": { - "label": true, - "text": "Fucking snowolf needs a tampon \n\nSeriously...", - "id": "221" - }, - "222": { - "label": true, - "text": "hay bitch \n\nthank you kindly for your advice on my vandalism but if your the dick who removed the thing abouth Berties make up costs Thats true... so ah FUCK YOU", - "id": "222" - }, - "223": { - "label": true, - "text": "You know what, fuck you, go revert my edit. This is more pointless than talking to a brickwall.", - "id": "223" - }, - "224": { - "label": true, - "text": "WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!\n\nHot smokin' lesbean goodness! I saw your picture and I figured, that you must be a LEZBIAN! WOOOOOO!!! Make out with another female and send me the images! WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!! Hot Smokin' Lezbian! Woooo!!!\n\nHere's a song I wrote about lesbians:\n\nLALALALAL-LEZ-BEE-ANN! I say, LALALALALALa-LEZ-BEE-ANN! \nWOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO, baby! \nLesbians turn me on. Every where I go \nThose hot smokin' ho's!!\nIt's just that kinda wo-a-orld,\nI love until I'm o-a-old!\nDon't take my lesbian away.\nI don't care if she's gay\nI love her anywaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay!!!!\n\nLez-bee-ann, I like the way you act.\nLez-bee-ann, i stare at your butt crack\nit's the way i was born,\ninto a world of scorn.\nbut it's okay,\nbecause i have my gay... little Lez-bee-ann!\n\nSing it with me:\n\nLALALALALA-Lez-bee-ann\nYeah, oh yeah, Lez-bee-ann!\nI just want a pecie of my Lez-bee-ann!\n\nLALLALALALALALAL-LEZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ-BEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE_ANNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN!", - "id": "224" - }, - "225": { - "label": true, - "text": "The most pathetic thing...\n...Is nationalist losers like yourself spreading your propaganda and expecting people will believe your shit with no questions asked. Get a life loser. Either thatm or fuck off and die.", - "id": "225" - }, - "226": { - "label": true, - "text": "\"\n\"\"And I hate everything to do with China\"\"\nWhat's with all the hate? I, believe it or not, do not hate Georgians. Just Saakashvili. He's an asshole. \"", - "id": "226" - }, - "227": { - "label": true, - "text": "The only thing you are persistant at you ugly bastard is fucking the TROLL'''", - "id": "227" - }, - "228": { - "label": true, - "text": "Carrot Top page \n\nYou little faggot, why are you ruining the Carrot Top page? His forum belongs in the links section! Go suck a cock!", - "id": "228" - }, - "229": { - "label": true, - "text": "\"\n\n You fagg0t \n\nI was fuck!ng talking to you, you bitch. \"\"oh no you're fuck!ng vandalising my fuck!ng goddamn page i better cry a fuck!ng wiki-river\"\" you c0cksucking father of wh0res. Suck my d!ck. That's the last time I ever try to be civil with someone. You have ruined my faith in wikipedia and I will now proceed to retract my $200 donation you miserable cvnt.\"", - "id": "229" - }, - "230": { - "label": true, - "text": "I raped Katy perry's penis last night with a dildo, and it was fun because then we started masturbating together!", - "id": "230" - }, - "231": { - "label": true, - "text": "KISS MY DICK \n\n...ALL 3 OF YOU", - "id": "231" - }, - "232": { - "label": true, - "text": "\"\n\nRDH, I wouldnt be so proud to label youself a \"\"Wiki Facsist\"\", as you have no idea of what the original meaning is of that world. That particular philiosophy caused millions of people to DIE, and people who disagreed with them were put to death. Please read the Wiki entry on Facsists. \n\nAnd, how do you know that the orignal entry on a page (with no corrobarting backup) is \"\"factual information\"\". You adjust your meaning of \"\"factual information\"\" to fit your particular brand of socialist bullshit. Just because Leithp is less of a \"\"Wiki Facsist\"\" is not a glowing statement either. The Wikipedia concept is doomed to failure becuase we have so-called editors like yourself who edit the pages to satisfy yourselves. A real editor has knowldege of a particular subject matter, and is supervised by people to ensure fairness of content. The REQUIRED registration solves no problem except less work for people like you, but still leaves an enormous creditability problem, which WIKI has been recently exposed to have. SO, have fun while you can, since this format is bullshit as far as a serious encyclopedia venue. \nGo help Sting save the rainforests moron..\"", - "id": "232" - }, - "233": { - "label": true, - "text": "tu mom es a dirty slut \n\ndisgusting..", - "id": "233" - }, - "234": { - "label": true, - "text": "Queen Fag \n\nHello, could you please explain why you are such a Queen Fag ? If you're not familiar with the term it is someone who promotes the queen and monarchy at every turn and whom enjoys homosexual behavior with other males. This involves receiving and delivering. It has come to my attention you are a giant queen fag and I was wondering how you became such a queen fag ? 216.145.245.75", - "id": "234" - }, - "235": { - "label": true, - "text": "Hi \n\nIm a fucking bitch.\n\n50.180.208.181", - "id": "235" - }, - "236": { - "label": true, - "text": "Bitch \n\nYou are a little bitch. I fuckin spent 6 hours on big sam (rapper) an you call it fuckin vandolism, hard ass aint you, fuck you i'm makin a true ass page an you wack off an delete my page. What the fuck is up, your like a snitch but to yourself. I'll fuckin edit your bitch ass page an delete that shit. I'll fuck up every single thing on your gay ass website if you keep deletin my ass. Wanna talk to me, IM me at GuttyBoy3D or email me at GuttyBoy3D@aol.com", - "id": "236" - }, - "237": { - "label": true, - "text": "forst of all get off your fat ass and get a job! second of all you need to quit putting false information on wikipedia ok! El Salvador wont have a crime section at all and if it will i will put one in the nicaragua one because nicaragua is the most corrupt and poor country full of thiefs the country is full of crime and i have articles and i will make a crime section for it i el salvador or san salvador has one. \n\ndont delete this because your not allowed to delete user comments ;)!", - "id": "237" - }, - "238": { - "label": true, - "text": "thinkbich mother fuckin asshole", - "id": "238" - }, - "239": { - "label": true, - "text": "Whatever, dude. Fuck off.", - "id": "239" - }, - "240": { - "label": true, - "text": "UNBLOCK: 1. The reason I used sockpuppets was to avoid harassment from user: Dibo who immediately reverted all my edits, , and when I forgot to log and branded me a sockpuppet of some previous user, here which the checkuser proved did not exist . I got into a revert war with user: Tancred and user: Dibo who from the contributions, seemed to devote their time exclusively to making trouble and aiding each other in edit wars, as is shown here, , as well as in the earlier case regarding user: Ehinger222 who they erroneeouslly accused me of being. After several days of edit warring with user: Tancred over the right to call rugby league football, football,(surely a neccessity and not erroneous), user: Tancred's vandalism to the rugby league nations template here , The names of various sports on the Marconi stadium site and whether the a-league franchises should be referred to as clubs(part of their franchise names, e.g.Queensland Roar FC is a franchise and not a club, but takes the name of a club for marketting reasons) or franchises, and whether minor premiers were premiers or not. Tancred has a history of edit wars, exemplified no better than here. I was banned by user: Chuq although my last free edits from here were this , , my last was this . is where I made an argument for my case for the A-League case. Earlier, I had asked Chuq to please get a non soccer admin to help sort it out made in language not too different to chuq's . Funnilly enough user:Chuq sent no warnings to user:Dibo and user:Tancred despite their equally uncivil and accusatry of vandalism here , (I was not one at that stage, as I was not trying to misuse the system and eing honest enough not to use this account to try to sway the argument), , (note the term POV rubbish). I felt I was hard done by and resolved to annoy the blockers as much as they had annoyed me before resuming as my previous identity and making a large number of useful contributions before being bogged down by a piece of shit like user:Dibo who provoked this whole encounter. User:Dibo and User:tancred are the ones who should be banned if any justice is to be done, and I am resolved upon annoying the whole lot of you unless I am unblocked and the usefullness of my <500 edits is acknowledged as actual contributions and user:dibo recognised as the edit warrer that he/she/ it is.", - "id": "240" - }, - "241": { - "label": true, - "text": "What did I do? I went to the site and found nothing.98.82.114.66 fuck you", - "id": "241" - }, - "242": { - "label": true, - "text": "\"\n\nYou know... [Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frasier's Curse you're fucking crazier] than I thought. Try ADDING SOME CONTENT, not judging others. What a frigging piker. GROW THE FUCK UP. // nkB \"", - "id": "242" - }, - "243": { - "label": true, - "text": "Eternal Pink why have you named you main guy in your crap manga because evreryone thinks the same thing that it will be fucking rubbish and it will kill all manga \nand no one thinks you can make one they all think you won't be able to finish it(or even start)", - "id": "243" - }, - "244": { - "label": true, - "text": "Dude \n\nDude stop busting my balls.", - "id": "244" - }, - "245": { - "label": true, - "text": "My Band Page's deletion. You thought I was gone. \n\nDeleting the comment I posted on your 'talk page' does not delete my feelings for your hasty decision to delete my page. You, sir, are still a cock-sucking douche fuck. Sit back for a second and think about what your life has become. ............ Done? That didn't take long did it? Nope. Because, as I am most certainly aware, your life is a shitstorm of sitting in front of the computer masturbating to fictional creatures. Your attempts to get rid of me are mediocre at best. You are constantly sucking the dick of failure. You don't want a personal attack, huh? Well, too bad, Fuckcock McDickerson. You've got one. From me. You can go ahead and delete my profile from wikipedia. I'll just make another one and come right back to 'Syrthiss's talk page and insult the dick off of you. How could you shatter the dreams of an innocent eighteen year old college freshman trying to make a name for his band. Does that make you happy? Fucking with people because you're an overweight, single, old man in a dead-end job. Did you spot that perhaps someone else was going to follow his dreams and you were trying to hold him back so somebody else could suffer like you? Yes you did. I don't make empty threats, so I won't be saying anything along the lines of 'i'll hurt you' or 'i'll eat the children from within your sister's womb', but I will say that you are a asshole, son-of-a-bitch, mother fucking cock sucker. So, go eat some more food and drown your sorrows you premature ejaculating, bald headed fuck.\n\nYou should do something nice for yourself, maybe go grab a couple of Horny Goat Weeds from your local convenience store and jack off for a little longer than three minutes tonight.\n\nSincerely,\nAn Asshole That's Better Than You In Every Way.", - "id": "245" - }, - "246": { - "label": true, - "text": "\"\n\n \"\"Absolute load of shit\"\" \n\nYour quoted remarks are clearly uncivil and yet you comment on the civility of others. Such a stance beggars belief. Would you care to explain yourself. Talk \"", - "id": "246" - }, - "247": { - "label": true, - "text": "No, maybe you should get a life instead of being like a shot to revert my vandalism on a page relating to a game nobody has talked about in the last two years. Wiki = made you their bitch. 86.160.60.82", - "id": "247" - }, - "248": { - "label": true, - "text": "I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuck niggas! I fuc", - "id": "248" - }, - "249": { - "label": true, - "text": "Stop removing my edits! \nWhy do you insist on being a flaming asscake?", - "id": "249" - }, - "250": { - "label": true, - "text": "DON'T DO IT UNLESS YOU WANT TO HAVE A FUCKED BRAIN AND EVERYTHING ELSE", - "id": "250" - }, - "251": { - "label": true, - "text": "thanks cunt \n\nthanks for speedily deleting my john kerr page. if it ever happens again you will wake up looking down the barrel of a shotgun and then we will punch your nut sack till we hit concrete but if we are on any other surface uh oh for you!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!", - "id": "251" - }, - "252": { - "label": true, - "text": "i never found it a supportive environment myself. you are speaking of an aspiration perhaps rather than the reality of wikipedia. In the meantime your suggestion that my remark to petrikrohn fascist could be misinterpreted is puzzling. it means he is a fucking lying fascist. how can that be misinterpreted. please stop with your specious humbug.", - "id": "252" - }, - "253": { - "label": true, - "text": "Wowwww. \n\nYou're really fucking ignorant. -", - "id": "253" - }, - "254": { - "label": true, - "text": "FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU", - "id": "254" - }, - "255": { - "label": true, - "text": "Do I hint a bit of jealousy, because they could potentially be on Wikipedia, or because they've made something of themselves, and you're just a little cunt who edits this site. Grow the fuck up.", - "id": "255" - }, - "256": { - "label": true, - "text": "LOADING THAT FUCKING GARBAGE HERE", - "id": "256" - }, - "257": { - "label": true, - "text": "i still edit, asshole.24.196.119.217", - "id": "257" - }, - "258": { - "label": true, - "text": "Go away and stop bothering me \n\ni don't want your slimy s**t all over my page, so why don't you f**k off and leave the rest of us to celebrate the fact we're all going to DIE??? YAYYYYYY \ud83d\ude04", - "id": "258" - }, - "259": { - "label": true, - "text": "More YouTube\n\nI f*cking hate those chain letters on YouTube, pisses me off everytime i see one. Like this one: 'this is a true thing that can happen! its not a chain letter! its kinda scary at first but it really works!! paste this message into 3 comments and press ATL F4 and your crushes name will appear on your screan!!! is so weird this is a true thing that can happen! its not a chain letter! its kinda scary at first but it really works!! paste this message into 3 comments and press ATL F4 and your crushes name will appear on your screan!!! is so weird'\n\nRetards.", - "id": "259" - }, - "260": { - "label": true, - "text": "User:Abd is Muslim scum", - "id": "260" - }, - "261": { - "label": true, - "text": "You are my bitch! \n\nI own your ass.", - "id": "261" - }, - "262": { - "label": true, - "text": ". That's right. You heard me.\n\nFAGGOT", - "id": "262" - }, - "263": { - "label": true, - "text": "gay dumb cunt!!!!!!! SWUCK MY DICK FAGGOTTTTTTTT", - "id": "263" - }, - "264": { - "label": true, - "text": "man u piece of shit \n\nu piece of shit,u fucki9ng 6 yr old don't evn hav a brainm.john cena can wrestle,u bitch.didn't u c him wrestle?he's a wrestler,ps.\n1.noone likes you\n2.noone understands you\n3.you insult our favourite wrestler bitch.\nyour gonna get blockd from editing right now,got it!!!!", - "id": "264" - }, - "265": { - "label": true, - "text": "dumbass\ndont call my shit a garage band, you sit on wikipedia all day and edit peoples nonsense come on how much room do you have to talk about anybodys anything.", - "id": "265" - }, - "266": { - "label": true, - "text": "Hey asshole, I'm Creamy3. Why don't you go suck on your mommy's dried up, saggy, crusty old titties. Go ahead and lick her sweaty, stinky old cunt while you're at it. Fuck you cocksucker.", - "id": "266" - }, - "267": { - "label": true, - "text": "Oh noes! I'm heart-broken. Get your fucking retarded hearts off my page, you little privileged child.", - "id": "267" - }, - "268": { - "label": true, - "text": "Hey, faggot. \n\nYou fucking retard. You better quit undoing my vandalism, bitchboy.", - "id": "268" - }, - "269": { - "label": true, - "text": "\"Email from User:HabsMTL to User: Phenomenon8980. \nYo. What in heaven's name is your problem with Rm994? He's just trying to explain to you how to properly edit a page on WP. Instead, you practically \"\"spit\"\" in the guy's face. So, in response to your actions, I will \"\"spit\"\" in your face and then you can tell me how it feels afterwards because you deserve it you motherfucker!!!! DO NOT BUG Rm994 EVER AGAIN, YOU HEAR ME YOU SOB? HabsMTL\n\nI am writing on behalf of Phenomenon8980. He has not contacted \n\n\"", - "id": "269" - }, - "270": { - "label": true, - "text": "what a little bitch running to the admins to block", - "id": "270" - }, - "271": { - "label": true, - "text": "You suck your family members' cocks!", - "id": "271" - }, - "272": { - "label": true, - "text": "\"\n\nAny chance I can get this shortened? I'll admit I acted like a dick, but I was just messing around. I don't even care that much about the issue at Chris Long, as I've been following it the past few days, and I probably wouldn't even jump back into the discussion there.\u25ba''''''Holla! \"", - "id": "272" - }, - "273": { - "label": true, - "text": "If you don't let me post, I will fuck you up", - "id": "273" - }, - "274": { - "label": true, - "text": "new name \n\nPerezhilton has changed his name to dick sucker.", - "id": "274" - }, - "275": { - "label": true, - "text": "You peice of irish scum \n\nHow dare you talk shit about my country? Fuck you, stupid shamrock bitch, I hope the next genocide we serve on you wipes your entire disgusting, repulsive race out. Fucking micks, you shouldn't even be alive after the first attempts, hopefully next time you wont be. Die. 92.24.85.159", - "id": "275" - }, - "276": { - "label": true, - "text": "Jet Streamer \nJet Streamer is a son of a bitch, don't listen to him, he can go to hell", - "id": "276" - }, - "277": { - "label": true, - "text": "What a motherfucking piece of crap those fuckheads for blocking us!", - "id": "277" - }, - "278": { - "label": true, - "text": "i hope you feel like shit for deleting my post. go fuck yourself", - "id": "278" - }, - "279": { - "label": true, - "text": "Well since you've stated that you don't care, then piss off and leave things such as this to people that actually have the power to do something (i.e. the admins) about the asinine reverts caused by that random fucktard.", - "id": "279" - }, - "280": { - "label": true, - "text": "\"\n\n You Are an Awesome wikipedian \n\n Some shit Some droppings of filthy muck mess to feel you better. Don't bother myself Summon \"", - "id": "280" - }, - "281": { - "label": true, - "text": "\" \n\u201c\"\"argument by argument\"\" (tm)\u201d? If you have to invent a fallacy then even you have to know that you\u2019re grasping for straws.\n\nCollect, we do not have to say \u201cthe world is regarded as being round by some members of the scientific community\u201d any more than we have to say \u201cwater has never definitively been proven to be wet\u201d. While I would personally prefer that we said something like \u201cHam\u2019s claims have been disproven by modern science\u201d (because I think it sounds more authoritative), if it\u2019s between \u201cincorrect\u201d or nothing then \u201cincorrect\u201d is clearly the superior choice because it is factually true.\n\nAnd please don\u2019t try that \u201call the intelligent readers already know he\u2019s wrong so there\u2019s no need to point out that he\u2019s wrong\u201d argument. Every fringe-pusher and their uncle has already tried that tactic and it\u2019s bullshit. We can\u2019t just allow Wikipedia to be full of rubbish and assume that the smart readers will filter the fact from the fiction. 76.107.171.90 \n\n\"", - "id": "281" - }, - "282": { - "label": true, - "text": "\"\n\nHere you go again. I meant to say TIGHTEN UP not lighten up. As in tighten up and do your job better. Who do you think you are to be constantly correcting me? Now I see why you work for a website because behavior like that will never fly in the real world. You do a shitty job of representing this site. Furthermore, DO NOT try to threaten me by saying I'm going to get blocked because I couldn't give a fuck less. I'm done with this website after what happened yesterday. So \"\"MS\"\" fuck you, you little smart ass and fuck wikipedia.\"", - "id": "282" - }, - "283": { - "label": true, - "text": "YEAH, FOR REAL, STUPID.", - "id": "283" - }, - "284": { - "label": true, - "text": "Continuing to learn to fuck off. \n\nContinuing to tell me to stop changing my page will result in me changing the page back to how I put it. As it is my page, fuck off.", - "id": "284" - }, - "285": { - "label": true, - "text": "Fucking lying nigger, fes up you peice of shit211.28.54.73", - "id": "285" - }, - "286": { - "label": true, - "text": "I think it's fair to say that people who found out what infantry is by reading this article are being complete niggers.-", - "id": "286" - }, - "287": { - "label": true, - "text": "\"\nok a direct quote from the page for fuck is \"\"Other uses are dysphemistic: The sexual connotation, usually connected to masturbation (in the case of \"\"go fuck yourself\"\" or \"\"go fuck your ass\"\") is invoked to incite additional disgust, or express anger or outrage. For example, \"\"Fuck that!\"\", \"\"Fuck no!\"\", or \"\"Fuck you!\"\".\"\" \nthats a bit worse than saying \"\"masturbation is like taking a good dump\"\" mate come on just put it back up and quit being a douche...\"", - "id": "287" - }, - "288": { - "label": true, - "text": "\"\n\nPretentious, stupid, moron...\nYou are leaving subhuman messages in the talk pages of shared IP addresses. By the time that someone sees these pathetic attempts at proving your worth the original user is long gone. Morons like you are biting the newbies like first class assholes. It wasn't like this back in my days, all of this bureaucratic idiocy is what drove me away despite having reaches the \"\"admin elite\"\" following a RFA. The only thing more pathetic that this project's degradation is YOU.\"", - "id": "288" - }, - "289": { - "label": true, - "text": "Joseph Cardinal Zen\nI am already too neutral towards the son of bitch. He is a spy of the Holy See.", - "id": "289" - }, - "290": { - "label": true, - "text": "\"\nHilarious even without the en-dash thing: I keep reading Post-Hotree\u2013Fuck. (talk) \"", - "id": "290" - }, - "291": { - "label": true, - "text": "YAMLA, are you stupid and a gay ass fag whos mother was a fucking whore you fuking idiotical mongolical son of a bitch you are so fucking faaaaaaagggggggggggggyyyyyyyyyyyyyy that oyuy suck as much cock as your dad who was the biggest gay ass idiot in history who ever sucked cock and oyu also stuck up a dildo up your mothers ass while she was pooing and you made your sister eat that shit!!!!", - "id": "291" - }, - "292": { - "label": true, - "text": "(I'm typing this with his cock in mu mouth!)", - "id": "292" - }, - "293": { - "label": true, - "text": "Shit \n\nGeorge tan031993 you're a bitch!!!\n\n go to hell!!!", - "id": "293" - }, - "294": { - "label": true, - "text": "\"\nFeck off, you waste of time. talk \"", - "id": "294" - }, - "295": { - "label": true, - "text": "What the fuck are you doing? \n\nFucking asshole81.178.153.156", - "id": "295" - }, - "296": { - "label": true, - "text": "NATE, YOU ARE FUCKING GOD DAMN FIRED! YOU ARE FUCKING FIRED! YOU ARE FUCKING FIRED! NATE, YOU ARE FUCKING GOD DAMN FIRED! YOU ARE FUCKING FIRED! YOU ARE FUCKING FIRED! NATE, YOU ARE FUCKING GOD DAMN FIRED! YOU ARE FUCKING FIRED! YOU ARE FUCKING FIRED! NATE, YOU ARE FUCKING GOD DAMN FIRED! YOU ARE FUCKING FIRED! YOU ARE FUCKING FIRED! NATE, YOU ARE FUCKING GOD DAMN FIRED! YOU ARE FUCKING FIRED! YOU ARE FUCKING FIRED! NATE, YOU ARE FUCKING GOD DAMN FIRED! YOU ARE FUCKING FIRED! YOU ARE FUCKING FIRED! NATE, YOU ARE FUCKING GOD DAMN FIRED! YOU ARE FUCKING FIRED! YOU ARE FUCKING FIRED! NATE, YOU ARE FUCKING GOD DAMN FIRED! YOU ARE FUCKING FIRED! YOU ARE FUCKING FIRED! NATE, YOU ARE FUCKING GOD DAMN FIRED! YOU ARE FUCKING FIRED! YOU ARE FUCKING FIRED! NATE, YOU ARE FUCKING GOD DAMN FIRED! YOU ARE FUCKING FIRED! YOU ARE FUCKING FIRED! NATE, YOU ARE FUCKING GOD DAMN FIRED! YOU ARE FUCKING FIRED! YOU ARE FUCKING FIRED! NATE, YOU ARE FUCKING GOD DAMN FIRED! YOU ARE FUCKING FIRED! YOU ARE FUCKING FIRED! NATE, YOU ARE FUCKING GOD DAMN FIRED! YOU ARE FUCKING FIRED! YOU ARE FUCKING FIRED! NATE, YOU ARE FUCKING GOD DAMN FIRED! YOU ARE FUCKING FIRED! YOU ARE FUCKING FIRED! NATE, YOU ARE FUCKING GOD DAMN FIRED! YOU ARE FUCKING FIRED! YOU ARE FUCKING FIRED! NATE, YOU ARE FUCKING GOD DAMN FIRED! YOU ARE FUCKING FIRED! YOU ARE FUCKING FIRED! NATE, YOU ARE FUCKING GOD DAMN FIRED! YOU ARE FUCKING FIRED! YOU ARE FUCKING FIRED! NATE, YOU ARE FUCKING GOD DAMN FIRED! YOU ARE FUCKING FIRED! YOU ARE FUCKING FIRED! NATE, YOU ARE FUCKING GOD DAMN FIRED! YOU ARE FUCKING FIRED! YOU ARE FUCKING FIRED! NATE, YOU ARE FUCKING GOD DAMN FIRED! YOU ARE FUCKING FIRED! YOU ARE FUCKING FIRED! NATE, YOU ARE FUCKING GOD DAMN FIRED! YOU ARE FUCKING FIRED! YOU ARE FUCKING FIRED! NATE, YOU ARE FUCKING GOD DAMN FIRED! YOU ARE FUCKING FIRED! YOU ARE FUCKING FIRED! NATE, YOU ARE FUCKING GOD DAMN FIRED! YOU ARE FUCKING FIRED! YOU ARE FUCKING FIRED! NATE, YOU ARE FUCKING GOD DAMN FIRED! YOU ARE FUCKING FIRED! YOU ARE FUCKING FIRED! NATE, YOU ARE FUCKING GOD DAMN FIRED! YOU ARE FUCKING FIRED! YOU ARE FUCKING FIRED! NATE, YOU ARE FUCKING GOD DAMN FIRED! YOU ARE FUCKING FIRED! YOU ARE FUCKING FIRED! NATE, YOU ARE FUCKING GOD DAMN FIRED! YOU ARE FUCKING FIRED! YOU ARE FUCKING FIRED! NATE, YOU ARE FUCKING GOD DAMN FIRED! YOU ARE FUCKING FIRED! YOU ARE FUCKING FIRED! NATE, YOU ARE FUCKING GOD DAMN FIRED! YOU ARE FUCKING FIRED! YOU ARE FUCKING FIRED! NATE, YOU ARE FUCKING GOD DAMN FIRED! YOU ARE FUCKING FIRED! YOU ARE FUCKING FIRED! NATE, YOU ARE FUCKING GOD DAMN FIRED! YOU ARE FUCKING FIRED! YOU ARE FUCKING FIRED! NATE, YOU ARE FUCKING GOD DAMN FIRED! YOU ARE FUCKING FIRED! YOU ARE FUCKING FIRED! NATE, YOU ARE FUCKING GOD DAMN FIRED! YOU ARE FUCKING FIRED! YOU ARE FUCKING FIRED! NATE, YOU ARE FUCKING GOD DAMN FIRED! YOU ARE FUCKING FIRED! YOU ARE FUCKING FIRED! NATE, YOU ARE FUCKING GOD DAMN FIRED! YOU ARE FUCKING FIRED! YOU ARE FUCKING FIRED! NATE, YOU ARE FUCKING GOD DAMN FIRED! YOU ARE FUCKING FIRED! YOU ARE FUCKING FIRED! NATE, YOU ARE FUCKING GOD DAMN FIRED! YOU ARE FUCKING FIRED! YOU ARE FUCKING FIRED! NATE, YOU ARE FUCKING GOD DAMN FIRED! YOU ARE FUCKING FIRED! YOU ARE FUCKING FIRED! NATE, YOU ARE FUCKING GOD DAMN FIRED! YOU ARE FUCKING FIRED! YOU ARE FUCKING FIRED! NATE, YOU ARE FUCKING GOD DAMN FIRED! YOU ARE FUCKING FIRED! YOU ARE FUCKING FIRED! NATE, YOU ARE FUCKING GOD DAMN FIRED! YOU ARE FUCKING FIRED! YOU ARE FUCKING FIRED! NATE, YOU ARE FUCKING GOD DAMN FIRED! YOU ARE FUCKING FIRED! YOU ARE FUCKING FIRED! NATE, YOU ARE FUCKING GOD DAMN FIRED! YOU ARE FUCKING FIRED! YOU ARE FUCKING FIRED! NATE, YOU ARE FUCKING GOD DAMN FIRED! YOU ARE FUCKING FIRED! YOU ARE FUCKING FIRED! NATE, YOU ARE FUCKING GOD DAMN FIRED! YOU ARE FUCKING FIRED! YOU ARE FUCKING FIRED! NATE, YOU ARE FUCKING GOD DAMN FIRED! YOU ARE FUCKING FIRED! YOU ARE FUCKING FIRED! NATE, YOU ARE FUCKING GOD DAMN FIRED! YOU ARE FUCKING FIRED! YOU ARE FUCKING FIRED! NATE, YOU ARE FUCKING GOD DAMN FIRED! YOU ARE FUCKING FIRED! YOU ARE FUCKING FIRED! NATE, YOU ARE FUCKING GOD DAMN FIRED! YOU ARE FUCKING FIRED! YOU ARE FUCKING FIRED! NATE, YOU ARE FUCKING GOD DAMN FIRED! YOU ARE FUCKING FIRED! YOU ARE FUCKING FIRED! NATE, YOU ARE FUCKING GOD DAMN FIRED! YOU ARE FUCKING FIRED! YOU ARE FUCKING FIRED! NATE, YOU ARE FUCKING GOD DAMN FIRED! YOU ARE FUCKING FIRED! YOU ARE FUCKING FIRED! NATE, YOU ARE FUCKING GOD DAMN FIRED! YOU ARE FUCKING FIRED! YOU ARE FUCKING FIRED! NATE, YOU ARE FUCKING GOD DAMN FIRED! YOU ARE FUCKING FIRED! YOU ARE FUCKING FIRED! NATE, YOU ARE FUCKING GOD DAMN FIRED! YOU ARE FUCKING FIRED! YOU ARE FUCKING FIRED! NATE, YOU ARE FUCKING GOD DAMN FIRED! YOU ARE FUCKING FIRED! YOU ARE FUCKING FIRED!", - "id": "296" - }, - "297": { - "label": true, - "text": "SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURITYFUCK HOMELAND SECURI", - "id": "297" - }, - "298": { - "label": true, - "text": "Dex will you please stop being such a bitch? \n\nDon't you believe in first ammendment rights? Come on now! I'll bet you are against legalizing cow tipping too aren't you you little fucking dork?", - "id": "298" - }, - "299": { - "label": true, - "text": "Block me, go right the fuck ahead. Fucking fascist cunt. All of you are elitist snobs, who don't give a shit about the facts. You don't care about the truth, you just report. Like little tabloids, you just lie. 71.59.189.46", - "id": "299" - }, - "300": { - "label": true, - "text": ". I should become a detective for figuring all that out! Oh yeah, I suck cocks. That's how I became a Wikipiedia admin. And because I have a lot of time on my hands. I often feel good about myself knowing that I can ban people from the internets", - "id": "300" - }, - "301": { - "label": true, - "text": "Hello, I think you are a fuckwad. Eat shit and die?", - "id": "301" - }, - "302": { - "label": true, - "text": "William S Saturn is a sockpuppet \n\nHey dickweed Saturn, remember me? You dumb fat bitch", - "id": "302" - }, - "303": { - "label": true, - "text": "And the pay sucks o)", - "id": "303" - }, - "304": { - "label": true, - "text": "Decline unblock \n\nYou declined my unblock request. Barrymcpeedmipants or wev his name is, is probably another student at my school, NOT me. If you understood this before it would make you real smarter than you currently are, you obnoxious cunt.", - "id": "304" - }, - "305": { - "label": true, - "text": "THE LINK IS THERE. I have an idea. Why not delete the page and then re create it a few days later you fucking retard? Have you a life at all? Is it your life to go around and delete everything here? Why not go OUTSIDE and build a snowman you loser?", - "id": "305" - }, - "306": { - "label": true, - "text": "Fuck you Sandra Oh is so goddamn ugly it's ridiculous.", - "id": "306" - }, - "307": { - "label": true, - "text": "didn't sign this so u cant ban me as u don't know who wrote this sloppy ass cunt\nfuck your warning and fuck your mum. and gg I didn't sign this so u cant ban me as u don't know who wrote this sloppy ass cunt\nfuck your warning and fuck your mum. and gg I didn't sign this so u cant ban me as u don't know who wrote this sloppy ass cunt\nfuck your warning and fuck your mum. and gg I didn't sign this so u cant ban me as u don't know who wrote this sloppy ass cunt\nfuck your warning and fuck your mum. and gg I didn't sign this so u cant ban me as u don't know who wrote this sloppy ass cunt\nfuck your warning and fuck your mum. and gg I didn't sign this so u cant ban me as u don't know who wrote this sloppy ass cunt\nfuck your warning and fuck your mum. and gg I didn't sign this so u cant ban me as u don't know who wrote this sloppy ass cunt\nfuck your warning and fuck your mum. and gg I didn't sign this so u cant ban me as u don't know who wrote this sloppy ass cunt\nfuck your warning and fuck your mum. and gg I didn't sign this so u cant ban me as u don't know who wrote this sloppy ass cunt\nfuck your warning and fuck your mum. and gg I didn't sign this so u cant ban me as u don't know who wrote this sloppy ass cunt\nfuck your warning and fuck your mum. and gg I didn't sign this so u cant ban me as u don't know who wrote this sloppy ass cunt\nfuck your warning and fuck your mum. and gg I didn't sign this so u cant ban me as u don't know who wrote this sloppy ass cunt\nfuck your warning and fuck your mum. and gg I didn't sign this so u cant ban me as u don't know who wrote this sloppy ass cunt\nfuck your warning and fuck your mum. and gg I didn't sign this so u cant ban me as u don't know who wrote this sloppy ass cunt\nfuck your warning and fuck your mum. and gg I didn't sign this so u cant ban me as u don't know who wrote this sloppy ass cunt\nfuck your warning and fuck your mum. and gg I didn't sign this so u cant ban me as u don't know who wrote this sloppy ass cunt\nfuck your warning and fuck your mum. and gg I didn't sign this so u cant ban me as u don't know who wrote this sloppy ass cunt\nfuck your warning and fuck your mum. and gg I didn't sign this so u cant ban me as u don't know who wrote this sloppy ass cunt\nfuck your warning and fuck your mum. and gg I didn't sign this so u cant ban me as u don't know who wrote this sloppy ass cunt", - "id": "307" - }, - "308": { - "label": true, - "text": "Orangemarlin, you're an asshole and that's all there is to it!", - "id": "308" - }, - "309": { - "label": true, - "text": "What the fuck gose here", - "id": "309" - }, - "310": { - "label": true, - "text": "many unsecured wi-fi hot spots, so many idiot wikipedia pages", - "id": "310" - }, - "311": { - "label": true, - "text": "i h8 u \n\ni h8 u u suck! ur a nerd w/ nothing better 2 do than piss peeps on wikipedia off!", - "id": "311" - }, - "312": { - "label": true, - "text": "List of Royal College Colombo alumni and Lalith Kothalawala and Cossde \n\nwhy this person Cossde doesn't want to / trying to avoid / or shy to add the name of old royalist the no one cheater in sri lanks to the list of List of Royal College Colombo alumni. this Cossde is a sick paranoid puppy who wants only the colombo 7 royalist to be survived on internet. u are an absolute sick ass hole( ).", - "id": "312" - }, - "313": { - "label": true, - "text": "Hey Gwernol, go suck a dick you fuckin piece of shit, I told you that you cant stop me, whether I'm Eoganan, Pan-ethnic, whoever the fuck, I will bring this piece of shit thing down, AND put faggot users like Wobble in their place. Anyone can edit this shit, so go fuck yaself biatch !", - "id": "313" - }, - "314": { - "label": true, - "text": "MY PAGE 3234434aAa \n\nYour just a mean OLD BULLSHITTING fart...as you would put it", - "id": "314" - }, - "315": { - "label": true, - "text": "Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad. The rebels Aleppo Central Prison have been completely. Assad's like you're a bastard. Many men like to have sex with your mother, mother-Assad.You're a genital fit. Many men will serve your mother every day, and every day it eats genital. But you and your bastard Assad and parents. No Gvhy can not eat. Of course I understand that when you and your parents bastard to eat not eat Wedge. I suggest that parents make you eat my wedge. In the hope that residents will separate your head from your body.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad. The rebels Aleppo Central Prison have been completely. Assad's like you're a bastard. Many men like to have sex with your mother, mother-Assad.You're a genital fit. Many men will serve your mother every day, and every day it eats genital. But you and your bastard Assad and parents. No Gvhy can not eat. Of course I understand that when you and your parents bastard to eat not eat Wedge. I suggest that parents make you eat my wedge. In the hope that residents will separate your head from your body.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad. The rebels Aleppo Central Prison have been completely. Assad's like you're a bastard. Many men like to have sex with your mother, mother-Assad.You're a genital fit. Many men will serve your mother every day, and every day it eats genital. But you and your bastard Assad and parents. No Gvhy can not eat. Of course I understand that when you and your parents bastard to eat not eat Wedge. I suggest that parents make you eat my wedge. In the hope that residents will separate your head from your body.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad. The rebels Aleppo Central Prison have been completely. Assad's like you're a bastard. Many men like to have sex with your mother, mother-Assad.You're a genital fit. Many men will serve your mother every day, and every day it eats genital. But you and your bastard Assad and parents. No Gvhy can not eat. Of course I understand that when you and your parents bastard to eat not eat Wedge. I suggest that parents make you eat my wedge. In the hope that residents will separate your head from your body.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad. The rebels Aleppo Central Prison have been completely. Assad's like you're a bastard. Many men like to have sex with your mother, mother-Assad.You're a genital fit. Many men will serve your mother every day, and every day it eats genital. But you and your bastard Assad and parents. No Gvhy can not eat. Of course I understand that when you and your parents bastard to eat not eat Wedge. I suggest that parents make you eat my wedge. In the hope that residents will separate your head from your body.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad. The rebels Aleppo Central Prison have been completely. Assad's like you're a bastard. Many men like to have sex with your mother, mother-Assad.You're a genital fit. Many men will serve your mother every day, and every day it eats genital. But you and your bastard Assad and parents. No Gvhy can not eat. Of course I understand that when you and your parents bastard to eat not eat Wedge. I suggest that parents make you eat my wedge. In the hope that residents will separate your head from your body.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad. The rebels Aleppo Central Prison have been completely. Assad's like you're a bastard. Many men like to have sex with your mother, mother-Assad.You're a genital fit. Many men will serve your mother every day, and every day it eats genital. But you and your bastard Assad and parents. No Gvhy can not eat. Of course I understand that when you and your parents bastard to eat not eat Wedge. I suggest that parents make you eat my wedge. In the hope that residents will separate your head from your body.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad. The rebels Aleppo Central Prison have been completely. Assad's like you're a bastard. Many men like to have sex with your mother, mother-Assad.You're a genital fit. Many men will serve your mother every day, and every day it eats genital. But you and your bastard Assad and parents. No Gvhy can not eat. Of course I understand that when you and your parents bastard to eat not eat Wedge. I suggest that parents make you eat my wedge. In the hope that residents will separate your head from your body.Hanibal911You're a bastard Pro-Assad. The rebels Aleppo Central Prison have been completely. Assad's like you're a bastard. Many men like to have sex with your mother, mother-Assad.You're a genital fit. Many men will serve your mother every day, and every day it eats genital. But you and your bastard Assad and parents. No Gvhy can not eat. Of course I understand that when you and your parents bastard to eat not eat Wedge. I suggest that parents make you eat my wedge. In the hope that residents will separate your head from your body.", - "id": "315" - }, - "316": { - "label": true, - "text": "Fuck You. Why don't you suck a turd out of my asshole! You think you can handle that, dumbfuck? eh?", - "id": "316" - }, - "317": { - "label": true, - "text": "\"\n\nAre you trying to be funny? If you are serious, and I get it correctly, you mean when someone mentioned \"\"I'm an expert for Cunt\"\", another will respond with \"\"Yes, I'm a big fan of Pussy too\"\". I might be wrong though.\"", - "id": "317" - }, - "318": { - "label": true, - "text": ". i love sucking off my dead father", - "id": "318" - }, - "319": { - "label": true, - "text": "Get a fucking life, and stop chaining my page.", - "id": "319" - }, - "320": { - "label": true, - "text": "STICK IT RIGHT UP UR ASS", - "id": "320" - }, - "321": { - "label": true, - "text": "You have no friends in real life, what makes you think anyone on the internet will like you? Take the hint, you're an a-hole.", - "id": "321" - }, - "322": { - "label": true, - "text": "Wanker \n\nCharles Knight is a complete arse wipe.", - "id": "322" - }, - "323": { - "label": true, - "text": "Blocking THREAT on 2012 page \n\nDo they get the same warning or is this more one-sided, hypocritical support for POD's control trips, bullying and verbal abusive attacks? He really is fucking up the 2012 page by ignoring expert assistance. ~M~ 67.164.145.1", - "id": "323" - }, - "324": { - "label": true, - "text": "Admins stick together. Never talk back. I get it. Lots of shit. The Dissident Aggressor", - "id": "324" - }, - "325": { - "label": true, - "text": "\"\n\nevery other press agency said the crowd was chanting \"\"you're a tory too\"\" only the daily mail which by the way is a tory paper reported that the croud chanted \"\"fucking tory jew\"\" he is a dispicable scab but that is because of his politics not his liniage94.168.210.8 \n\n\"", - "id": "325" - }, - "326": { - "label": true, - "text": "Suck my dick \n\nI assure you, my semen is considered wegetarian if you will please swallow it. Thank you please!", - "id": "326" - }, - "327": { - "label": true, - "text": "COCKSUCKER BEFORE YOU PISS AROUND ON MY WORK", - "id": "327" - }, - "328": { - "label": true, - "text": "Groin \n\nYou sad fuck. I'm going to restore my edit, and you are going to leave it, or else I wil knee you in the groin yourself, prick. 91.108.208.101", - "id": "328" - }, - "329": { - "label": true, - "text": "right it's less selective you stupid fuck", - "id": "329" - }, - "330": { - "label": true, - "text": "\"\n\nListen asshole, I'm leaving this on my page so as not disrupt the integrity of yours - I've had it with your constant pestering and what I believe is referred to as \"\"wikistalking.\"\" This entire matter has been solved and concluded however, you seem to be enjoying yourself by way of acting like a goddamned three-year-old with a wet diaper. I have no interest in engaging in tit-for-tats with some jackass who has nothing better to do with his time than needle at users who settled a matter amicably and have moved on. Cut it out, leave me alone, and move on. \n\nFeel free to erase this when you're done reading it.\"", - "id": "330" - }, - "331": { - "label": true, - "text": "Your mom plays gay music.. linkin park is the shit mutha fucka!!!", - "id": "331" - }, - "332": { - "label": true, - "text": "I shall look forward to the day I hear of your death, and I intend to continue terrorizing you and make your life a living hell you nasty little stupid Mexican faggot.", - "id": "332" - }, - "333": { - "label": true, - "text": "\"\n\n User:GeorgiaWikiWriter \n\nHello Ymblanter, \n\nI have warned calling it \"\"a group of fucking morons.\"\" His behavior needs to be addressed asap. Thanks. Jaqeli \"", - "id": "333" - }, - "334": { - "label": true, - "text": "you studid cock sucker u stop callin me ok its a frank Garrett eatin the worms crawl outa your moms pussy you fucking retardo hit I retardo", - "id": "334" - }, - "335": { - "label": true, - "text": "\"\n\nim not discussing anything. are u even from valencia??? uve got no idea what ure doing, by replacing our language with another one, u know how insulting that is for us??? wiping out our culture, roots and identity? u think this is some kind of stupid game? YOU'RE THE ONES ATTACKING US, WHY CANT U FUCKING LEAVE US ALONE, U COME TO VALENCIA AND SAY CATALAN IS THE SAME AS VALENCIAN AND U WOULDNT GET OUT ALIVE. WE'RE TIRED OF THIS CATALAN IMPERIALISM OF ABSORBING OTHER CULTURES, LIKE THEIR FLAG \"\"SENYERA\"\" IS ACTUALLY ARAGONESE.\n\nthis whole wikishit is so stupidly biased. ive got many proofs that valencian and catalan are sister tongues but one does not come from the other, however they're in spanish and my english is not that good to properly translate it nor ive got enough time to do it.\"", - "id": "335" - }, - "336": { - "label": true, - "text": "Some asshole keeps changing the dates\n\nAdvanced Warfighter specifically states that the game took place in 2013 yet some asshole idiot keeps changing it to 2014. Please do something about that.", - "id": "336" - }, - "337": { - "label": true, - "text": "F**K ALL RIDES AT WORLDS OF FUN \n\nI hate all rides at Worlds of Fun because they are sh_tty and boring. All ride operators at WOF should be fired sued and hanged. Burn all WOF coasters. Arrest all WOF park operators! Assassinate all WOF customers! I heard that a boy died on Timberwolf on August, 2014. That's stupid! Worlds of Fun should have nown better to built that sh_t ride. Worlds Of Fun cares about money and prophet moar than they're customers. Burn that sh_t park down! F**K YOU RIDES! WorldS Of Fun is dangerouser than GRround Zero and Area 51. \n\nWorlds of Fun should burn in Hell!", - "id": "337" - }, - "338": { - "label": true, - "text": "YOUR A JERK!!!!!!! \n\nYou are a jerk yo lazy butt!", - "id": "338" - }, - "339": { - "label": true, - "text": "Trolling \n\nFacebook has been reported and is regullary trolled by Josh Ware of Nevada. This is because Josh Ware is a waste of life and a faggot who fucks his dad and can't figure anything else to do in his own existence then to perform these two hobbies continuously. Watch out for that guy. He's digustingly and sickeningly gay.", - "id": "339" - }, - "340": { - "label": true, - "text": "Hey asshole, \n\nI'll add whatever I want aobut Edison New Jersey because this is Wikipedia.", - "id": "340" - }, - "341": { - "label": true, - "text": "t\nPHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE!\n\nSALT!\nPHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE!\n\nSALT!\nPHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE!\n\nSALT!\nPHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE!\n\nSALT!\nPHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE!\n\nSALT!\nPHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE!\n\nSALT!\nPHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE!\n\nSALT!\nPHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE!\n\nSALT!\nPHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE!\n\nSALT!\nPHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE!\n\nSALT!\nPHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE!\n\nSALT!\nPHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE!\n\nSALT!\nPHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE!\n\nSALT!\nPHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE!\n\nSALT!\nPHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE!\n\nSALT!\nPHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE!\n\nSALT!\nPHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE!\n\nSALT!\nPHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE!\n\nSALT!\nPHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE!\n\nSALT!\nPHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE!\n\nSALT!\nPHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE!\n\nSALT!\nPHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE!\n\nSALT!\nPHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE!\n\nSALT!\nPHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE!\n\nSALT!\nPHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE!\n\nSALT!\nPHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE!\n\nSALT!\nPHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE!\n\nSALT!\nPHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE!\n\nSALT!\nPHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE!\n\nSALT!\nPHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE!\n\nSALT!\nPHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE!\n\nSALT!\nPHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE!\n\nSALT!\nPHUQ OFF YOU KNOB OF CHEESE!\n\nSALT!he", - "id": "341" - }, - "342": { - "label": true, - "text": "HOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!! \n\nHES AN ASS THAT LINUXBEAK IS", - "id": "342" - }, - "343": { - "label": true, - "text": "You dick \n\nI am no vandal talk", - "id": "343" - }, - "344": { - "label": true, - "text": "dear omni looser stop editing my crap then die", - "id": "344" - }, - "345": { - "label": true, - "text": "ok, if you consider yourself the master of logic that you tell everyone you are on your profile, feel free to read this in its entirety and write back. i would be soooo happy to have some ongoing discussion.\n\ni am an op1 (rank 99.9) dental student from australia, in uni at the age of 16, and despite that i can still manage to not be anywhere near as much of a tightass as you show yourself to be.\n\nSeriously, do you think you are better than the people that give you shit about your attitude to wikipedia? It is so pathetic that you have to grab at power in this nonexistent world just because you have no influence on anything meaningful in the outside world.\n\nI think the inferences I make about your real world life are more than fair. Do you actually have a life? No, a level 70 shadow preist on wow does not count, nor does having a password for private irc channels and torrent referrers. Like, where is your girlfriend? Perhaps, if you continue to piss off everyone you come into contact with (i make reference to the discussion of the neutrality of the anglican church grammar school page), someone may just take the time out to slap you the fuck awake and make you step back and see how pathetic what you are doing really is.\n\nYou make me sick....fuckkkkk you are a vegetarian, i hadn't noticed your username for what it was until now, and you continue to reinforce every idea i ever formed about who you may be.\n\nseeing as it is now 1:20am AEST and i have shit to do 2morro i really cant be bothered reading any of what i have just written, because you are clearly so deeply entrenched in your own pathetic way of being and have trained your mind to ignore everything anyone else says to you that you do not like by getting 'you're a gay pedo' (and similar) emails.\n\nif i had smoked myself stupid and that was the deepest level i could insult you on, i would send fuck you emails to you all day long. i can take time out of my day, as much as i have better things to do, to give you shit because you are a pathetic, insecure, power hungry piece of shit, weilding you wikipedia administrator status like a trident against everyone that hates you, when really you more than likely were dropped as a child/feel unloved/were bullied in school/have a small dick and feel you have to be a complete social recluse and hide behind a screen.\n\ni hope you do write back. please do. oh my, please write back. i would love to listen to your self-reichous shit, thinking you can make 'quirky' little quips and rhetorts to distance yourself from what people say about you, and feel you have re-established yourself as superior.\n\nim guessing you are probably online doing pointless shit right now, and so i am keen to receive my reply soon.\n\nregards,\nsteezemuffin\na combination of style and ease, spelt with an extra 'e' for extra steeze. oh, and its in a muffin. isn't that just fucking dandy?", - "id": "345" - }, - "346": { - "label": true, - "text": "I admit I'm stupid. I'm like all Russians, just a drunk gay with vodka in his pants.", - "id": "346" - }, - "347": { - "label": true, - "text": "cant help acting like a little punk ass bitch", - "id": "347" - }, - "348": { - "label": true, - "text": "Do U own Wikipedia? \n\n Was believing wikipedia was an open source. Didnt know people like Jeff G and Bg(fucking) white own it!!!!!!!!!", - "id": "348" - }, - "349": { - "label": true, - "text": "dick shit cock fuck \n\nyou are a fag\n\nyou are a big bag of shit by the side of the road and its not even shitgarbabge day\n\nyou are a one way ticket to shitsville with extra mayo and a side of shut the fuck up", - "id": "349" - }, - "350": { - "label": true, - "text": "hey faggot. \n\nInsert non-formatted text hereyour faggot moldy ass deleted my information on the toilet seat. ima hunt your faggot queer cocksucking ass down and run you over with a very big cat. bitch nigga im out.", - "id": "350" - }, - "351": { - "label": true, - "text": "\"why the hell are they called \"\"boxer\"\" \"", - "id": "351" - }, - "352": { - "label": true, - "text": "HOGTIE THIS YOU FAGGOT", - "id": "352" - }, - "353": { - "label": true, - "text": "\"\n\n retARdED \ni was wondering how long it would take your faggot ass to stalk me\nfinally after a few months you get it, well, i guess ill blank my user page and create a new account, since you have to be a little bitch\nive done so many constructive edits then an anon (which is probably you) runs through and reverts a deletion which is perfectly fine and not vandalism, you run to his rescue. go home, little girl. burgz33 is unblocked october 1st anyway, so ha! \"", - "id": "353" - }, - "354": { - "label": true, - "text": "Nuisance piece of shit, fuck off, wiki doesn't need your vandalism", - "id": "354" - }, - "355": { - "label": true, - "text": "\"\n\n Tasmania at Conservapedia, a bit of a laugh. \n\nhttp://www.conservapedia.com/Tasmania\n\n(All quotes are from http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Tasmania&oldid;=54126 )\n\n\"\"Tasmania is a small Island, and state in Australia. Its population is approximately 1 million and its capital, Hobart, has a population of just over 400 000 people.\"\"\n\n\"\"Tasmania joined the Australian federation in 1900, a move that was not supported by a significant minority of the voting population. In 2004, a referendum to leave the federation was only just defeated (it required a majority in both houses as well by voters and failed to gain a majority in the upper house).\"\"\n\nDon't you love the Encyclopaedia that no one (unless you are registered, and you can't register) can edit?~ (Fuck you!) \"", - "id": "355" - }, - "356": { - "label": true, - "text": "Fucking administrators DAMN YOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU", - "id": "356" - }, - "357": { - "label": true, - "text": "Ill photo shop a dick in his illuminati mouth", - "id": "357" - }, - "358": { - "label": true, - "text": "\"\n\n Lock Down \n\nI don't know about the \"\"Bulgarian BULLSHIT season\"\", but don't be fooled from where exactly i connect. If i see you editing, or someone else you send, the DDA40X article one more time, you will spend the next few years in prison. I will arrange you a meeting with certain people for suspicions of terrorism. Yes. I can do that. A terror suspect nowadays, you can kiss your young life goodbye. If you file complaints and i'm banned, you and your naked ass will have the whole time in the world, in the cell block, to think what went wrong. 87.252.167.254 \"", - "id": "358" - }, - "359": { - "label": true, - "text": "Automatic transmission hoax \n\nAbout the ZIS-101automatic transmission that was an crazy ruskie imbeciles propaganda,I had just fixed that shit.", - "id": "359" - }, - "360": { - "label": true, - "text": "no fuckin make me fudge packer 'gwernol'[more like queerhole]", - "id": "360" - }, - "361": { - "label": true, - "text": "IT IS NOT A TKO YOU IDIOT!!!YOU HAVE NO IDEA WHAT IT IS AND IT'S A SWINGING NECKBREAKER YOU VERY UNSMART AND VERY UNCLEVER FAGGOT,GOT IT!!!\nDARK-HOODED SMOKER", - "id": "361" - }, - "362": { - "label": true, - "text": "Question... \n\nDid POnOs ever get inserted into vagOO?", - "id": "362" - }, - "363": { - "label": true, - "text": "(UTC)\n\nYou never been on the damn bus, Tlk | E-M 01:28:42, 2005-09-09", - "id": "363" - }, - "364": { - "label": true, - "text": "Please refrain from making me fuch you. Your edits appear to constitute masturbation and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sex-room. Thank you. 2A00:1CA8:18:0:216:3EFF:FECE:1ACB", - "id": "364" - }, - "365": { - "label": true, - "text": "Eat shit and die \n\nYou can block me now but that doesn't mean anything. You're nothing but a step below a rent-a-cop. Admins ain't shit.", - "id": "365" - }, - "366": { - "label": true, - "text": "you fucking harry potter gay porn!!!!!!! sucking asshole morhone", - "id": "366" - }, - "367": { - "label": true, - "text": "YOU SUCK \nWhat is wrong with you? All I wanted to do was make an article about my wrestling coach and you deleted it before i even got finished making it! Guess what- he got to see it anyway, cuz I told him to go online then i recreated it! Censor that you piece of crap! Its probably already gone again but i don't care. You shouldn't mess with wrestlers. Robby will do something a lot more painful to you than his star wrestler did to that other kid on his page. (Believe it or not, that guy was ME.) I'm irish too you shouldn't player hate on fellow irish people.\n\nHillcrestwrestler", - "id": "367" - }, - "368": { - "label": true, - "text": "EFFIN PEICE OF SHEET. \nSUUCK A 8============>", - "id": "368" - }, - "369": { - "label": true, - "text": "HE LIKES ITIN THE ASS BY MUHAMAD ALI AND KELLY HAS A GIANT PENIS AND ALSO FUCKED COLUMBUS", - "id": "369" - }, - "370": { - "label": true, - "text": "\"\n\n A barnstar for you! \n\n The Photographer's Barnstar your photos are horrible. You are an idiot. Fuck you \"", - "id": "370" - }, - "371": { - "label": true, - "text": "fuck you george \n\nakhtak sharmota", - "id": "371" - }, - "372": { - "label": true, - "text": "Who is this stupid boy ? A kiwi, for sure.", - "id": "372" - }, - "373": { - "label": true, - "text": "wikipedian policy\n\nI see now how Wikipedia is. If someone breaks the rules its ok as long as they kiss ass. This is bullshit. He started this stupid shit and was persistent until he got me banned. This is so fucking gay all Ive done is try to help Wikipedia but thanks to this stupid shit Im banned. WTF? See I refuse to kiss ass because nobody on here is better than me. As a matter of fact Im better than everyone else on here.", - "id": "373" - }, - "374": { - "label": true, - "text": "F__CK YOU WIMPY SISSY COWARDLY WIKIPEDIA PUSSIES AND F__CK CANADIANLINUXUSER", - "id": "374" - }, - "375": { - "label": true, - "text": "Crafty, bro, I was going to leave you a nice message about you being a fag or something, but I realized you actually are a fag. Sorry to hear, man.", - "id": "375" - }, - "376": { - "label": true, - "text": "Sannse is a big fat bitch for not leaving the users alone along with Angela. Billj is a Dumbass for deleting my messages. Sannse is a big fat bitch for not leaving the users alone along with Angela. Billj is a Dumbass for deleting my messages. Sannse is a big fat bitch for not leaving the users alone along with Angela. Billj is a Dumbass for deleting my messages. Sannse is a big fat bitch for not leaving the users alone along with Angela. Billj is a Dumbass for deleting my messages. Sannse is a big fat bitch for not leaving the users alone along with Angela. Billj is a Dumbass for deleting my messages. Sannse is a big fat bitch for not leaving the users alone along with Angela. Billj is a Dumbass for deleting my messages. Sannse is a big fat bitch for not leaving the users alone along with Angela. Billj is a Dumbass for deleting my messages. Sannse is a big fat bitch for not leaving the users alone along with Angela. Billj is a Dumbass for deleting my messages. Sannse is a big fat bitch for not leaving the users alone along with Angela. Billj is a Dumbass for deleting my messages. Sannse is a big fat bitch for not leaving the users alone along with Angela. Billj is a Dumbass for deleting my messages. Sannse is a big fat bitch for not leaving the users alone along with Angela. Billj is a Dumbass for deleting my messages. Sannse is a big fat bitch for not leaving the users alone along with Angela. Billj is a Dumbass for deleting my messages. Sannse is a big fat bitch for not leaving the users alone along with Angela. Billj is a Dumbass for deleting my messages. Sannse is a big fat bitch for not leaving the users alone along with Angela. Billj is a Dumbass for deleting my messages. Sannse is a big fat bitch for not leaving the users alone along with Angela. Billj is a Dumbass for deleting my messages. Sannse is a big fat bitch for not leaving the users alone along with Angela. Billj is a Dumbass for deleting my messages. Sannse is a big fat bitch for not leaving the users alone along with Angela. Billj is a Dumbass for deleting my messages. Sannse is a big fat bitch for not leaving the users alone along with Angela. Billj is a Dumbass for deleting my messages. Sannse is a big fat bitch for not leaving the users alone along with Angela. Billj is a Dumbass for deleting my messages. Sannse is a big fat bitch for not leaving the users alone along with Angela. Billj is a Dumbass for deleting my messages. Sannse is a big fat bitch for not leaving the users alone along with Angela. Billj is a Dumbass for deleting my messages. Sannse is a big fat bitch for not leaving the users alone along with Angela. Billj is a Dumbass for deleting my messages. Sannse is a big fat bitch for not leaving the users alone along with Angela. Billj is a Dumbass for deleting my messages. Sannse is a big fat bitch for not leaving the users alone along with Angela. Billj is a Dumbass for deleting my messages.", - "id": "376" - }, - "377": { - "label": true, - "text": "burn in hell motherfucker", - "id": "377" - }, - "378": { - "label": true, - "text": "Stop pussy-footing \nBAN ME! You did it before!", - "id": "378" - }, - "379": { - "label": true, - "text": "Srnec, you blunt idiot! I wrote that article, and I'm 8 years old. Next time you look at an article, JUDJE IT WITH CARE!", - "id": "379" - }, - "380": { - "label": true, - "text": "DON'T BLOCK ME I AM RIGHT AND I FUCKING KNOW IT. BLOCK THAT ASSHOLE KANSAS BEAR OR SOMETHING. JUST LEAVE ME THE FUCK ALONE.", - "id": "380" - }, - "381": { - "label": true, - "text": "THE PERSON WHOSE EDITS YOU REVERTED \n\nHY. \n\nI JUST WANT TO TELL YOU THAT YOU CAN'T BAN ME. \nPROXIES ARE VERY NICE. AREN'T THEY? \nNOW FUCK YOU.", - "id": "381" - }, - "382": { - "label": true, - "text": "I SAID GOOD DAY BIATCH\nDONT BREAK WP:3RR BIATCH\nHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAHAHHAHAHAAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH\nAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH\nAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH\nAHAHAHAAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA", - "id": "382" - }, - "383": { - "label": true, - "text": ", 26 April 2015 (UTC)\nnote restored stop fucking hounding mr the rollback eas a mistake btw am on mobile 15:26", - "id": "383" - }, - "384": { - "label": true, - "text": "Fuck you Orange Suede Sof \n\nFuck you Orange Suede Sofa, ClueBot, ClueBotNG, Megizue, Dreaded Walrus and J. Delanoy. You wanna be cyber bullied for personal attacks? Anonymous hates you.", - "id": "384" - }, - "385": { - "label": true, - "text": "\"\n\nBullshit! Why does Amy Roloff get her own entry if Matt's the breadwinner? Does that mean Kate's the breadwinner? BOTH Roloffs get one. It's *not* the Kate show! It's a whitewash from the obsessive Jon & Kate \"\"sheeple\"\" from writing about his exploits bar hopping w/ college co-eds. Matt Roloff has his own entry and fairly includes the bad side of his life, his DUI arrest and trial. Jon would also have to have his own entry include the bad. But the fanaticals have their heads buried in the sand and *won't* acknowledge one single negative. This (((ISN'T))) a balanced article. It's a commercial!\"", - "id": "385" - }, - "386": { - "label": true, - "text": "Bitch \n\nShit!!!\n\n go to hell!!!", - "id": "386" - }, - "387": { - "label": true, - "text": "important \n\nYou Suck! I think you should go suck on a car tail pipe, while it's moving. You fucking bastard!", - "id": "387" - }, - "388": { - "label": true, - "text": "\"\n\nAnd why is \"\"screw you, motherfucker\"\" a personal attack? I'm not implying anything about 80.174.59.92, am I?\n\n76.210.66.152 \"", - "id": "388" - }, - "389": { - "label": true, - "text": "Shut the fuck up you wannabe cholo scum.", - "id": "389" - }, - "390": { - "label": true, - "text": "sup niggaz \n\ncan u unprotect so i can post like a massive goatse on this page? ta", - "id": "390" - }, - "391": { - "label": true, - "text": "\"Vandalism==\nI'm damn sick and tired of idiot vandalising this page with things like \"\"OMFG Dale is so fucking hot\"\" NO ONE FUCKING CARES! Fuck off if you are going to do shit like that. There should be an instant ban for stuff like that!\n\n==\"", - "id": "391" - }, - "392": { - "label": true, - "text": "Up yours you fucking fruit. InShaneee what kind of name is that anyway, for a cat?", - "id": "392" - }, - "393": { - "label": true, - "text": "He's a ass like I said.", - "id": "393" - }, - "394": { - "label": true, - "text": "YOU GUYS ARE A BUNCH OF DICKS", - "id": "394" - }, - "395": { - "label": true, - "text": "You like to be fucked", - "id": "395" - }, - "396": { - "label": true, - "text": "Angry \n\nFuck you bitch", - "id": "396" - }, - "397": { - "label": true, - "text": "How about this \n\nYou are a cunt?", - "id": "397" - }, - "398": { - "label": true, - "text": "Gay Sex =\n\nDemiurge loves it in his Irish ass.", - "id": "398" - }, - "399": { - "label": true, - "text": "Fuck you! You sadistic admin that orgasms when deleting articles.", - "id": "399" - }, - "400": { - "label": true, - "text": "FUCKAN STOP CHANGON IT OR I AM TWIST OFF YOURE LITTOL PEE-WEES AND YOURE FUCKON MONKEY\n\nFUCKAN IDEOT my name am JOSSEL MUBEDEON AND I DONE FUCKON MAKE THINGS BETTOR\n\nI FIXES THINGS\n\nundarstand", - "id": "400" - }, - "401": { - "label": true, - "text": "Heh. Suck it down chump.", - "id": "401" - }, - "402": { - "label": true, - "text": "MuYou suck asshole ch", - "id": "402" - }, - "403": { - "label": true, - "text": "\"\n\nYour spiteful, shitty, uneducated, ignorant, cuntesque, wankbagness\nAlthough I violently insulted you as above, as this is my genuine opinion of your foolish, reactionary actions; I do implore you to actually review my edits rather than relying on \"\"consensus\"\" to scare away editors with thirty years of recognised, published, research experience in the relevant field.\"", - "id": "403" - }, - "404": { - "label": true, - "text": "Oh wow last warning you aren't even a registered user! Go get a girl or something or edit other Wikipedia articles just really get a fucking life!", - "id": "404" - }, - "405": { - "label": true, - "text": "probably that you are a german... fucking germans, nothing changes", - "id": "405" - }, - "406": { - "label": true, - "text": "Some helpful advice ) \n\nLook shithead, why the fuck did you delete my redirects\u2014clit rock and butt rock? They are perfectly synonymous with the names of the articles they redirected to. Of course, you must be one of those musically ignorant philistine faggots who seem to crawl all over the Internet. \n\nTell you what, I'll give you some helpful on how not to be such a retarded poof:\nFind a way to go back in time.\nGo back to the year when you were an infant.\nGo to the house you grew up in.\nTell you bitch-ass mother to not keep dropping you on your head. Tell that ho that because of her, you magically developed symptoms of Down's Syndrome as you grew older. So much so that these you have to become a mindless vanda-fight admin-gnome on Wikipedia cause that's the only productive thing you can do.\n\nI hope you don't take this the wrong way. I'm just trying to help somebody with far less mental facility than I. Best of luck with your future, and remember that thanks to medical advances Down's syndrome patients are slowly getting integrated into normal society. So there's hope for you yet )", - "id": "406" - }, - "407": { - "label": true, - "text": "I know you wikiterrorists love to limit free speech but you have to admit that IP banning is foolish, if that is your best option then you are a fool.\nKeep being an asshole Duran, it is your only talent", - "id": "407" - }, - "408": { - "label": true, - "text": "You Suck, her's why\n\nYour Spanish name, your shitbrown attitude, your out-right stupidity...the list goes on and on. You're probably one of those silly shitbags who gets nailed to a cross on Easter as well. Slurp shit and die.", - "id": "408" - }, - "409": { - "label": true, - "text": "you a bitch \n\nI hope you die you\ufeff worthless pathetic fucking cunt.", - "id": "409" - }, - "410": { - "label": true, - "text": "Fucked with the wrong muchacho. 21:19, July 23, 2005 (UTC)", - "id": "410" - }, - "411": { - "label": true, - "text": "She pisses off \n\nGo piss of butt, so you know that you just heard me that I will use a fork to take and destroy your eyes and take out your FUCKIN! blood, so just piss off butt, piss off but, I SAID PISS OFF BUTT, last chance: PISS OFF BUTT!, that's it, I will kill you, pow, so see that, you are dead and I will carry you now, penis, dick, boobs, breasts, poo.", - "id": "411" - }, - "412": { - "label": true, - "text": "LOL; charles, you are a real fag aren't you? siding with chinks?? \ngo fuck yourself, asswipe! we don't need no chinks in here. \n\nFAG", - "id": "412" - }, - "413": { - "label": true, - "text": "Violent fucking imagery? Are you kidding me?\nHoly fucking shit. Dude you are part of the problem I really hope you know that.\nI know you think you're doing doing something good. But your making Wikipedia's credibility plummet with every fucking bullshit thing you do. I really hope you know that. 71.192.72.22", - "id": "413" - }, - "414": { - "label": true, - "text": "Burn Deck \n\nIf that'd guy's burn deck is like what I think it is than he is in for a blrude awakening!!! Leviathan motherfucker!!!", - "id": "414" - }, - "415": { - "label": true, - "text": "YOUR ARE FUCKING GAY WAD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! \n\nI fucked your mum. OH WAIT YOUR GAY YOU DONT HAVE A MOM!!! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA\nLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL\nCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTI fucked your mum. OH WAIT YOUR GAY YOU DONT HAVE A MOM!!! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA\nLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL\nCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTI fucked your mum. OH WAIT YOUR GAY YOU DONT HAVE A MOM!!! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA\nLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL\nCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTI fucked your mum. OH WAIT YOUR GAY YOU DONT HAVE A MOM!!! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA\nLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL\nCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTI fucked your mum. OH WAIT YOUR GAY YOU DONT HAVE A MOM!!! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA\nLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL\nCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTI fucked your mum. OH WAIT YOUR GAY YOU DONT HAVE A MOM!!! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA\nLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL\nCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCU", - "id": "415" - }, - "416": { - "label": true, - "text": "\"\n\n Watcha gonna do \n\nWhatcha ya gonna do brother, when the 24\"\" pythons and Hulkamania run wild on you!? \n\nProbably suck Buck Winston's cock!\"", - "id": "416" - }, - "417": { - "label": true, - "text": "So you admit to forgetting about Melbourne existing in both Florida and Australia, thereby validating my edit as justified, but cos you're so quick to judge you still lay fault with me? If you want a thing like wiki to become an open encyclopaedia for everyone and not just geeks, then ditch the attitude and processes cos who can be fucked learning them?", - "id": "417" - }, - "418": { - "label": true, - "text": "HAHAHAHAHAHA \n\nThis movie will always suck, no matter how much this article tries not to be bias! Mwahahahahaha!!!", - "id": "418" - }, - "419": { - "label": true, - "text": "An ass. LOL. The vandalism was about goaste. 96.48.13.234", - "id": "419" - }, - "420": { - "label": true, - "text": "Penis \n\nDid you sex with Grawp? H-A-6-6-E-P???\n\nPenis.\n\nPenis.\n\nVagina.\n\nVagina.", - "id": "420" - }, - "421": { - "label": true, - "text": "(Your a Fucking Wanker. Lol)", - "id": "421" - }, - "422": { - "label": true, - "text": "you suck people hahaha lalalala\n\nsigned your mama", - "id": "422" - }, - "423": { - "label": true, - "text": "Bahamut is gay \n\nIt's true you little bitch.", - "id": "423" - }, - "424": { - "label": true, - "text": "SHUT THE FUCK UP!\nSHUT THE FUCK UP!\nSHUT THE FUCK UP!\nSHUT THE FUCK UP!\nSHUT THE FUCK UP!\nSHUT THE FUCK UP!\nSHUT THE FUCK UP!\nSHUT THE FUCK UP!\nSHUT THE FUCK UP!\nSHUT THE FUCK UP!\nSHUT THE FUCK UP!\nSHUT THE FUCK UP!\nSHUT THE FUCK UP!\nSHUT THE FUCK UP!\nSHUT THE FUCK UP!\nSHUT THE FUCK UP!\nSHUT THE FUCK UP!\nSHUT THE FUCK UP!\nSHUT THE FUCK UP!\nSHUT THE FUCK UP!\nSHUT THE FUCK UP!\nSHUT THE FUCK UP!\nSHUT THE FUCK UP!\nSHUT THE FUCK UP!vv\nSHUT THE FUCK UP!\nSHUT THE FUCK UP!\nSHUT THE FUCK UP!\nSHUT THE FUCK UP!\nSHUT THE FUCK UP!\nSHUT THE FUCK UP!\nSHUT THE FUCK UP!\nSHUT THE FUCK UP!\nSHUT THE FUCK UP!\nSHUT THE FUCK UP!\nSHUT THE FUCK UP!\nSHUT THE FUCK UP!\nSHUT THE FUCK UP!\nSHUT THE FUCK UP!\nSHUT THE FUCK UP!\nSHUT THE FUCK UP!\nSHUT THE FUCK UP!\nSHUT THE FUCK UP!\nSHUT THE FUCK UP!\nSHUT THE FUCK UP!\nSHUT THE FUCK UP!\nSHUT THE FUCK UP!\nSHUT THE FUCK UP!\nSHUT THE FUCK UP!\nSHUT THE FUCK UP!\nSHUT THE FUCK UP!\nSHUT THE FUCK UP!\nSHUT THE FUCK UP!", - "id": "424" - }, - "425": { - "label": true, - "text": "Dude you crazy! \n\nDude, you are totally not cool. Why did you leave me that message on Resume? I totally fixed it. I don't know what's up you gluteus maximus. Dog, you need to cool off your jets in a salon. Get a pedicure and don't be so upset when a brotha is just trying to have a good time. If you want to go on a date with me just leave me your number on my user talk page. Peace", - "id": "425" - }, - "426": { - "label": true, - "text": "I'll fucking eat your queef asshole \n\nIf you talk on my talk page, I'll rape your family you niggerlover.", - "id": "426" - }, - "427": { - "label": true, - "text": "weirdo alert. So !BenBen is your real name not DickDick or AdolfAdolf or pedepede", - "id": "427" - }, - "428": { - "label": true, - "text": "YOU ARE A FAGGOT This is doing it right for personal attacks. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nigger for more information.", - "id": "428" - }, - "429": { - "label": true, - "text": "IN THE anus with a nigger dick in it.68.33.41.181", - "id": "429" - }, - "430": { - "label": true, - "text": "\"\n\n Bye \n\nI'm not going to deal with the assholes any more. Best wishes, \u00a0Boomer! \"", - "id": "430" - }, - "431": { - "label": true, - "text": "You are a vandal, you removed the reference to chapter 291 even tho i edited not to violate the copyright. Also there is no speculation again. You are the dick, not me.", - "id": "431" - }, - "432": { - "label": true, - "text": "Aaron Swartz \n\nStop fucking reverting my goddamn edits!!! I think Aaron Swartz is a dumb-ass, and he should have been\nkilled a long time ago. I know where you live; I WILL KILL YOU IF YOU REVERT ANY MORE PAGES!!!!!", - "id": "432" - }, - "433": { - "label": true, - "text": "\"\n\nI've sanitised Bushell's language and deleted the earlier quote which was FAR more offensive (Bushell claimed he wouldn't like to \"\"fuck her\"\".) How can it be concluded this language is acceptable but calling Trott a \"\"dumpling\"\" isn't? This smacks of hypocrisy and an obvious anti-bias to \"\"new\"\" editors on EastEnders pages. \"", - "id": "433" - }, - "434": { - "label": true, - "text": "Kathryn Bigelow is a patriot who makes great war films. She set out to make an action film about the hunt for Bin Laden years ago. Then President Obama made a tough call and got the guy. Now the right wing propaganda machine seeks to negate the boost to Obama's image by making a political football out of Bigelow's film. This year has seen a huge, funded effort by the Super PAC propagandists to spread propaganda through social media and this article, not to mention the OPSEC fraudsters is a great example of that. Leave Kitty B's patriotic film alone, you flaming assholes!", - "id": "434" - }, - "435": { - "label": true, - "text": "\" A misery==\nYou have made my life a misery on Wikipedia, and now you're gonna pay for it you disgusting, ignorant and stupid bastard. \u2014Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.137.14.174 \n\n=\"", - "id": "435" - }, - "436": { - "label": true, - "text": "Neutrality \n\nI suggest you delete the entry for 'fuck' as its neutrality is in question\n\nAlso, can you delete www.wikipedia.org because it is not neutral toward knowledge, it seems to promote knowledge. people should be stupid , like worms\n202.92.40.8", - "id": "436" - }, - "437": { - "label": true, - "text": "hey shithead \n\nquit fucking with all the ufc pages and go get a fucking life you god damn mother fucking loser.", - "id": "437" - }, - "438": { - "label": true, - "text": "I put it on the history the best I could you cunt. Now go fuck your mother.", - "id": "438" - }, - "439": { - "label": true, - "text": "Go ahead, call your friend rather than take 30 seconds to say WHAT you object to in the content. Classic abusive admin shithead behavior.", - "id": "439" - }, - "440": { - "label": true, - "text": "NIGHTSTALLIONS WIFE GOT FUCKED BY A NIGGER AND HAD HIS BABY\n\nAND IT SMELLED OF FRIED CHICKEN", - "id": "440" - }, - "441": { - "label": true, - "text": "FUCK OFF \n\nHow dare you remove messages that I post on MY talk page you wanker. If you did it again i will sort you out. 93.97.43.168", - "id": "441" - }, - "442": { - "label": true, - "text": "FUCK YOU!!!!!!!!!!!! YOU FUCKING NIGGER BAG OF SHIT I HOPE YOU DIE IN A HORRIBLE FIRE WITH YOUR GAY ASS KIDS I WILL SLIT THEIR THROAT YOU MOTHERFUCKER DONT YOU EVER THINK OF BANNING ME AGAIN OR I WILL RAPE YOU ANALLY!!!!!", - "id": "442" - }, - "443": { - "label": true, - "text": "Fine\nFine. Carter Page sucks anyway.", - "id": "443" - }, - "444": { - "label": true, - "text": "u fucking prick \n\nhey cocksucker\nwell done for fucking up two perfectly good articles on the cadet rifle.\nwhy dont u just fuck off and die\nu removed perfectly good information just because as a dick loving faggot you didn't like it\nhuh?\nwhere is all the information about the new gun?\nthe differences?\nthe improvement?\nthat u deleted made all that clear.\nand then it was merged \n\nas per discussion there was no discussion cunt\n\ndid u ever read the articles u merged dick face or r u 2 fcukin dumb\nsee you been done for editing warring \ni know the answer\n\nso fuck off, off off and take your clueless hard on guns with ya.\ncunts like you wank over guns but u know shit about them", - "id": "444" - }, - "445": { - "label": true, - "text": ". Fu ck ing trollreasons", - "id": "445" - }, - "446": { - "label": true, - "text": "You can't fucking block me for 3 months for fucking personal attacks or harassment! You fucking stupid hellhole, you better motherfucking let me vandalize Wikipedia again FRICKEN NOW!", - "id": "446" - }, - "447": { - "label": true, - "text": "Fuck off and stop posting on my talkpage you annoying cunt.", - "id": "447" - }, - "448": { - "label": true, - "text": "I will do Whatever i want and it is my right, what is both of yous Problem Asshole.", - "id": "448" - }, - "449": { - "label": true, - "text": "Why do you feel the need to be up my ass? Get a life will you? It's not that serious. Don't you have anything else better to do with your time instead of bother me? Get a real job! You are way to concerned with the things I do specifically. It seems every time I make an edit, you are right there within seconds to say something about it. For the record, I have not acted inappropriately regarding matters in the past. I was being personally attacked yet I saw no warnings on anyone else's page. Another thing, I don't need you to tell me that you THINK that my comments on another page sounded like a personal attack. If I say it wasn't then it wasn't bottom line. Why dont you go and bother people who are on here to do nothing more than vandalize people's pages. If I ever hear from you again I will be making a formal complaint to the site's REAL administrators to let them know you are harrasing me.", - "id": "449" - }, - "450": { - "label": true, - "text": "GET OFF OF WIKIPEDIA, YOU WALNUT-PANELED IDIOT!!! YOU WOULDN'T KNOW A GOOD SCHEDULE IF IT PUT CLAMPS ON YOUR TESTICLES!!! 81.154.227.244", - "id": "450" - }, - "451": { - "label": true, - "text": "Of course it's also possible that you are, in fact, just a dick", - "id": "451" - }, - "452": { - "label": true, - "text": "You confessed to be an animalfucker \n\nYou finally did it, now get a life animalfucker.", - "id": "452" - }, - "453": { - "label": true, - "text": "I love dicks in my butt. ([[User", - "id": "453" - }, - "454": { - "label": true, - "text": "Please keep in mind that the verifiability accuracy of the information is what is at issue here. This is not a pissing match.", - "id": "454" - }, - "455": { - "label": true, - "text": "Lol oh noes DONT BLOCK EM FROM CHANGING SHIT!!!!!!!!!", - "id": "455" - }, - "456": { - "label": true, - "text": "YOU DUMB ASS!!\nWhy the fuck would you delete the trajectories on the B'Day page you fuckin retarted BITCH it's more informal and now look at how small the page is you whore you probaly get fucked by ur dad everyday you whore slut bag!!", - "id": "456" - }, - "457": { - "label": true, - "text": ", oh shit, stop making warnings, motherfucker, also, fuck you.", - "id": "457" - }, - "458": { - "label": true, - "text": "fuckbook \n\nit sucks hairy balls", - "id": "458" - }, - "459": { - "label": true, - "text": "IM GLAD THAT THE MOTHERFUCKERS WIFE DIED! FILLS ME WITH IMMENSE PLEASURE TO KNOW SUCH A BIGOT HAD TO SUFFER TERRIBLY D D D D D D D D", - "id": "459" - }, - "460": { - "label": true, - "text": "do go fuck off bastard\nDo Yyou Have a life?\ngo fuck off bastard and yank your cock through your ass. I hate you and hope you go away forever. lame is you fuck your mom. die die die and all that crap. this is for mahy mahonerz\nass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass. I ass.", - "id": "460" - }, - "461": { - "label": true, - "text": "HEY FAG WHY YOU GOTSTA DELETE MY EDITS!? \n\nFAG", - "id": "461" - }, - "462": { - "label": true, - "text": "What a fucking nosey asshole \n\nAny reason why you decided to butt your nose in where it doesn't belong?", - "id": "462" - }, - "463": { - "label": true, - "text": "could you quit being such a huge fucking loose butthole you stupid cunt.", - "id": "463" - }, - "464": { - "label": true, - "text": "\"\nGo rot in hell you evil liittle bastard. '''''' \"", - "id": "464" - }, - "465": { - "label": true, - "text": "SLEEP WITH ME OR I WILL FUCKING KILL YOU AND BLOCK YOU!", - "id": "465" - }, - "466": { - "label": true, - "text": "and suck a dick two times every hour until sunrise", - "id": "466" - }, - "467": { - "label": true, - "text": "I know Elvis was a turd-burgler 'cos I fucked him only last week. (he's gotten a bit smelly recently and isn't as plump as he used to be, by the way) ~~~~", - "id": "467" - }, - "468": { - "label": true, - "text": "Hello I am Clue Bot, and I am a Niger Fukcing Piece of Shlt.", - "id": "468" - }, - "469": { - "label": true, - "text": "real cute. you rip the wings off flies too? \n\nYou're as stupid as you are corrupt. I've dealt with you corrupt assholes before, I was giving the kid a warning. Nice job playing with him for your own amusement, you fucking corrupt fags.", - "id": "469" - }, - "470": { - "label": true, - "text": "Pascal is a flaming homosexual, he likes doing young boys in the anal hole and is a huge pedo, him and michael should live together", - "id": "470" - }, - "471": { - "label": true, - "text": "hey \n\nhey faggot, are you dead? or are you watching your mom getting raped by islamic terrorists?", - "id": "471" - }, - "472": { - "label": true, - "text": "Get out my talk page you smelling wog!", - "id": "472" - }, - "473": { - "label": true, - "text": "Go to Hell, fatso \n\nHey, Dickwad! If you ignore me, I'll poke a hole in you and release all the fat! I WILL NOT hesitate to roast you in an oven like the little piggy you are! Unblock everyone you've blocked or suffer the consequences!!!", - "id": "473" - }, - "474": { - "label": true, - "text": "fuck \n\nyou son of a bitch your s\u0131de make us creasy fuck you and your s\u0131de", - "id": "474" - }, - "475": { - "label": true, - "text": "Hey idiot. I'm simply verifying the TRUTH. Mobile17 was NOT the first to have a ringtone maker online.. Brinked was. Do some fucking research before you remove my shit. Tired of you assholes removing my hard work I'm putting into making wikipedia a relevant page.", - "id": "475" - }, - "476": { - "label": true, - "text": "FUCKING SUCK YOU LIBERAL BASTARD WHO THINKS MICHAEL MOORE IS TRUTHFUL YOU ASSHOLE FUCK BITCH TITS CUNT SNATCH", - "id": "476" - }, - "477": { - "label": true, - "text": "wikipedia search warrior4321 \n\nyour a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dickhead your a dic", - "id": "477" - }, - "478": { - "label": true, - "text": "Bullshit... Turn off the garbage they play on the radio today, and listen to this woman's voice. She outsang everyone... As such, I've reworded that sentence a little differently...", - "id": "478" - }, - "479": { - "label": true, - "text": "You're a stupid cunt \n\nFuck you dumb arse, your mum has a hairy cunt and I hope and pray that you die, no, fuck that, I wish you would die, if I had three wishes, one of them would be to have you dead, and the others would be so that everyone you knew hated your cunt like face.", - "id": "479" - }, - "480": { - "label": true, - "text": "Disregard, I suck cock.", - "id": "480" - }, - "481": { - "label": true, - "text": "Can I insert my big dick into your vagina? \n\nIt will make you feel good.", - "id": "481" - }, - "482": { - "label": true, - "text": "\"\n\nWhat you \"\"hold\"\" or believe doesn't fucking matter, fuckface. Wikipedia doesn't do subjective. Eat a dick.\n\n\"", - "id": "482" - }, - "483": { - "label": true, - "text": "fuck you \n\nFuck all the faggot assed, cock suckin', drug addicted, shit sniffin', retarded megalomaniacs who call themselves admins. The couldn't get fucked up the arse if they bent over in a gay bar with $50 stuffed in their crack. They are just a bunch of lame ass losers with no life and even fewer friends. If real life came up and bit them on the as, they would die or just OD.", - "id": "483" - }, - "484": { - "label": true, - "text": "Well, obviously there is nothing wrong with those examples you gave. If they indeed violate WP:WAF like you claim, then that guideline is bullshit and should be ignored.", - "id": "484" - }, - "485": { - "label": true, - "text": "DEAR BIGNOLE\nAre you gay or do you just suck AlienTravellers dick sometimes? I try to figure this out because you are always on his page and always sucking him off. Please answer me 214.13.192.187", - "id": "485" - }, - "486": { - "label": true, - "text": "Flowers is just some backup characters she has nothing to do with whoever Ramona is. Just add Season 2 please seriously if you don't know 2-4 months from now you're gonna feel like a dumbass like you are.", - "id": "486" - }, - "487": { - "label": true, - "text": "Fuck it hard in its Black ring! OOOOOOOOOOOHHHHHHHHHH YYYYYYYYYEEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!", - "id": "487" - }, - "488": { - "label": true, - "text": "\"\n\n \"\"Criticism\"\" \n\nWhat the hell is that crap in the section some moron called \"\"Criticism\"\"? It isn't even formated like the rest of the sections and it is just a list of people/dates, not criticisms.\"", - "id": "488" - }, - "489": { - "label": true, - "text": "And what about laws of natural justice? who the fuck is going to give me a chance to present my defense before blocking me. Never mind u probably are a downtrodden commoner of the British suburbs who has not heard of such laws. Google them at least you ignorant scurvy dog. By the way I know you guys have developed low self confidence and inferiority complex due to the abuses inflicted upon you by the nobility but don't try to take it out on us you loser dog, learn something from your American cousins, they at least have some respect for other man's dignity and that makes their citizens whether black or blue fight for the preservation of their country and constitution.", - "id": "489" - }, - "490": { - "label": true, - "text": "ur a cunt undoing my revisions. block me if u dare bitch", - "id": "490" - }, - "491": { - "label": true, - "text": "DONT BREAK WP:3RR BIATCH", - "id": "491" - }, - "492": { - "label": true, - "text": "\"\n\n My Statement \n\nOh wow, I take a little drive and come back to a nuclear war zone? I guess I can take on each point...\n\n The fact that MF was not blocked for the same behavior is rather odd (also... if you ask a question after telling me to stop replying... what do you really expect?).\n I agree that Tan needed to be blocked and I agree with the desysopping. \n To say that I have no right to be angry is a foolhardy notion. I was told multiple times to fuck off (btw, when told to fuck off, I am considerably less likely to comply).\n . They both hail from the infamous Tiscali network. That being said, rpeh has no reason to be involved in this discussion (he has a personal issue with me ever since he was desysopped on another wiki; he hasn't gotten over it). I intend to request a checkuser and request a block for sockpuppetry.\n User:Georgewilliamherbert places too much weight on unofficial warnings. A vandal can be warned four times but a user once? Hmmmm...\n Prodego has no reason to be desysopped. He had every right to block for a violation of WP:NPA tens of times. \n\u2013\u00a0(talk) \"", - "id": "492" - }, - "493": { - "label": true, - "text": "fuck you \n\ni hate you why do you delete pages do you have a life are you gay if you make the page marring manz you hall be cool however at the moment you are gay", - "id": "493" - }, - "494": { - "label": true, - "text": "\"\n\nJoe Johnston is honestly an idiot and has been blabbing about JP4 for almost 10 years. The JP trilogy is dead. The new film, if there will even be one, won't use the JP4 title. It's really stupid and annoying how much information contradicts each other. (mailbox) \"", - "id": "494" - }, - "495": { - "label": true, - "text": "Trolling \n\nFacebook has been reported and is regullary trolled by Josh Ware of Nevada. This is because Josh Ware is a waste of life and a faggot who fucks his dad and can't figure anything else to do in his own existant then to perform these two hobbies continuously. Watch out for that guy. He's sickeningly gay.", - "id": "495" - }, - "496": { - "label": true, - "text": "Assholes \n\nOn behalf of all Americans, Canadians, Japanese and other countries who have yet to see it, thank you for spoiling the fucking movie.", - "id": "496" - }, - "497": { - "label": true, - "text": "Go kill yourself \n\nYou should be ashamed of yourself. Twoofers like you are scumbags that deserve to die. You anti-scientific assholes are destroying America.", - "id": "497" - }, - "498": { - "label": true, - "text": "Ram it up ur ass very hard till ur eyes water", - "id": "498" - }, - "499": { - "label": true, - "text": "eat a dick \n\nand fuck off", - "id": "499" - }, - "500": { - "label": true, - "text": "Edit your stupidity away.", - "id": "500" - }, - "501": { - "label": true, - "text": "Total Asshole bitches like you just need to get the fuck off. Motherfucking Shithole. Eat your dick.", - "id": "501" - }, - "502": { - "label": true, - "text": "\"\n\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Saab_Lofton\n\nOh that's right you were kicked out of San Francisco State for being too radical! That's a joke\n\nhttp://community.seattletimes.nwsource.com/archive/?date=19981101&slug;=2781130!\n\n\"\"Lofton wrote \"\"A.D.\"\" while a student at San Francisco State University and spent so much time hawking the book when it was published three years ago that his grades began to fall and the university cut off his financial aid.\"\"\n\n\"\"Of course, plenty of wayward students have had their financial aid renewed after having missed classes for far less substantial reasons, so one wonders why was it so important for me to be dismissed \"\"\n\nBecause of your grades dumb ass! You can miss classes and still get good grades if your competent.\n\nthe first and only of A.D. printing consisted of two thousand copies\n\nWow, that must have sold in record time! A whole two thousand, your almost as famous as Steven King\"\" Dorksickle!\n\n\"\"I sold all three thousand copies of Btl Nvrg within the span of a year\"\"\n\nSomehow I doubt that since it was published in 1998 and you were still hawking it to Tim Boucher in 2006\n\nhttp://www.popocculture.com/28/battle-neverending-by-saab-l\n\n\"\"He lived on the streets in Berkeley while going to Solano College\"\"\n\nI looked up Solano college and it's 40 miles away from Berkeley. So I guess you must of hitchhiked there everyday right? Bullshit!\n\nHey lets see some examples of your cartooning. Don't got any right? That's what I figured.\n\nSee the lies just keep piling up!\"", - "id": "502" - }, - "503": { - "label": true, - "text": "Who gives a shit? Anthony Bourdain is a tool. I just wish he had children so I could stomp on there testicals. Just kidding but he is a massive tool. He couldn't carry Emerils jockstrap. Next time I see him I'll knock his teeth out....", - "id": "503" - }, - "504": { - "label": true, - "text": "THIS DUDE THAT BLOCKED ME IS A FUCKING COCK SUCKER!!!!!!!!!! HEXACHORD SUCK SOME DICK NEGRO", - "id": "504" - }, - "505": { - "label": true, - "text": "\" WILL MY MOTHERFUCKING SAFETY BE GUARANTEED???? I FUCKING HOPE SO!!! I'M BRINGING MY OWN FUCKIN' WEAPONS!! PAY ME WHEN I GET BACK MOTHERFUCKERS!!! OH YEAH I'VE GOT A JOKE...A FAMILY (HUSBAND, WIFE, SON, DAUGHTER, DOG) WALKS INTO AN AGENT'S OFFICE AND TELLS HIM THAT THEY'VE GOT A GREAT VAUDEVILLE ROUTINE...HE SAYS \"\"WE DON'T HIRE KIDDY ACTS\"\" AND THEY SAY \"\"BUT WE'RE REALLY GOOD!\"\" AND SO THE AGENT SAYS \"\"FINE, LET ME SEE WHAT YOU'VE GOT, BUT IF YOU SUCK I'M THROWING YOU OUT\"\"...SO THE FAMILY GETS READY...THE DAUGHTER HITS THE CD PLAYER AND CIRCUS MUSIC BEGINS PLAYING, THE FATHER JUMP KICKS THE SON IN THE HEAD AND STOMS HIS FACE IN THE GROUND UNTIL IT'S A BLOODY PULP, THEN PROCEEDS TO JERK OFF AND CUM ALL OVER HIS SHATTERED SKULL. MEANWHILE THE MOTHER BEGINS VIOLENTLY FINGER FUCKING THE DAUGHTER AS THE DOG FUCKS THE MOTHER IN THE ASS HOLE. THIS IS THE POINT WHEN THE FATHER TAKES THE LEFTOVER BRAIN MATTER FROM THE SON'S HEAD AND SHOVES IT INTO THE MOTHER'S PUSSY, THEN BEGINS FUCKING HER PUSSY WHILE SIMULTANEOUSLY STICKING HIS FINGER DOWN THE DAUGHTER'S THROAT UNTIL SHE VOMITS ALL OVER THEM BOTH. THEN THE DOG BITES THE MOTHER'S HAND OFF AS SHE'S FINGER FUCKING THE DAUGHTER, LEAVING HER HAND IN THE DAUGHTER'S PUSSY AS BLOOD SQUIRTS ALL OVER THE PLACE...THE FATHER TAKES BLOOD FROM THE GROUND, SMEARS IT ALL OVER THE MOTHER'S CHEST, BENDS OVER, AND BEGINS SHITTING ALL OVER THE OPEN WOUND WHERE HER HAND USED TO BE BEFORE THE DOG BIT IT OFF. THEY TAKE THE DOG AND SHOVE IT IN A MICROWAVE, HEATING IT UP UNTIL IT EXPLODES, THEN TAKE THE DOG REMAINS, MIX IT WITH THE FATHER'S SHIT, THE SON'S HEAD WOUND, AND THE FATHER'S CUM, AND SHOVE IT INTO THE DAUGHTER'S MOUTH. THEN THE FATHER RIPS THE SON'S DICK OFF AND FUCKS THE DAUGHTER WITH IT, AS THE MOTHER LOCATE'S THE SON'S TESTICLES, BREAKS THEM OPEN, AND DRINKS THE SPERM THAT COMES OUT. THEN THE FAMILY LINES UP AND SAYS \"\"TA DA!\"\"...THERE'S SILENCE FROM THE AGENT, UNTIL HE FINALLY SAYS \"\"I LOVE IT! WHAT DO YOU CALL THAT?\"\"...AND THE FAMILY SAYS \"\"WE CALL IT...THE ARISTOCRATS!\"\"\"", - "id": "505" - }, - "506": { - "label": true, - "text": "Liar \n\nI did not create the page. I only removed the tag. You are a liar, and a troll. Now kindly, fuck off.75.104.127.83", - "id": "506" - }, - "507": { - "label": true, - "text": "\"\n\n Contested deletion \n\nThis page should not be speedily deleted because... (It speaks the truth of my life. You don't know the hardships I've been through. If you and your Jew @$$ wants to decide my destiny and silence my First Amendment Rights, FUkYOU! Get your fat wikipedia @ss off of my profile. You might think you have a life or something. Going around saying, \"\"Whoopdie Fuckedy Doo!, Ima go around and delete some random persons Wikipedia Page!\"\" FUkYOU! You don't choose what to do with my wikipedia page. Fukyou and fucyour mom.) \"", - "id": "507" - }, - "508": { - "label": true, - "text": "J\u00e9sk\u00e9 Couriano is a stupid faggot!!!! \n\nJ\u00e9sk\u00e9 Couriano is a stupid faggot!!!!J\u00e9sk\u00e9 Couriano is a stupid faggot!!!!J\u00e9sk\u00e9 Couriano is a stupid faggot!!!!J\u00e9sk\u00e9 Couriano is a stupid faggot!!!!J\u00e9sk\u00e9 Couriano is a stupid faggot!!!!J\u00e9sk\u00e9 Couriano is a stupid faggot!!!!J\u00e9sk\u00e9 Couriano is a stupid faggot!!!!J\u00e9sk\u00e9 Couriano is a stupid faggot!!!!J\u00e9sk\u00e9 Couriano is a stupid faggot!!!!J\u00e9sk\u00e9 Couriano is a stupid faggot!!!!J\u00e9sk\u00e9 Couriano is a stupid faggot!!!!J\u00e9sk\u00e9 Couriano is a stupid faggot!!!!J\u00e9sk\u00e9 Couriano is a stupid faggot!!!!J\u00e9sk\u00e9 Couriano is a stupid faggot!!!!J\u00e9sk\u00e9 Couriano is a stupid faggot!!!!J\u00e9sk\u00e9 Couriano is a stupid faggot!!!!J\u00e9sk\u00e9 Couriano is a stupid faggot!!!!J\u00e9sk\u00e9 Couriano is a stupid faggot!!!!J\u00e9sk\u00e9 Couriano is a stupid faggot!!!!J\u00e9sk\u00e9 Couriano is a stupid faggot!!!!J\u00e9sk\u00e9 Couriano is a stupid faggot!!!!J\u00e9sk\u00e9 Couriano is a stupid faggot!!!!J\u00e9sk\u00e9 Couriano is a stupid faggot!!!!J\u00e9sk\u00e9 Couriano is a stupid faggot!!!!J\u00e9sk\u00e9 Couriano is a stupid faggot!!!!J\u00e9sk\u00e9 Couriano is a stupid faggot!!!!J\u00e9sk\u00e9 Couriano is a stupid faggot!!!!J\u00e9sk\u00e9 Couriano is a stupid faggot!!!!J\u00e9sk\u00e9 Couriano is a stupid faggot!!!!J\u00e9sk\u00e9 Couriano is a stupid faggot!!!!J\u00e9sk\u00e9 Couriano is a stupid faggot!!!!J\u00e9sk\u00e9 Couriano is a stupid faggot!!!!J\u00e9sk\u00e9 Couriano is a stupid faggot!!!!J\u00e9sk\u00e9 Couriano is a stupid faggot!!!!J\u00e9sk\u00e9 Couriano is a stupid faggot!!!!J\u00e9sk\u00e9 Couriano is a stupid faggot!!!!J\u00e9sk\u00e9 Couriano is a stupid faggot!!!!J\u00e9sk\u00e9 Couriano is a stupid faggot!!!!J\u00e9sk\u00e9 Couriano is a stupid faggot!!!!J\u00e9sk\u00e9 Couriano is a stupid faggot!!!!J\u00e9sk\u00e9 Couriano is a stupid faggot!!!!J\u00e9sk\u00e9 Couriano is a stupid faggot!!!!J\u00e9sk\u00e9 Couriano is a stupid faggot!!!!J\u00e9sk\u00e9 Couriano is a stupid faggot!!!!J\u00e9sk\u00e9 Couriano is a stupid faggot!!!!J\u00e9sk\u00e9 Couriano is a stupid faggot!!!!J\u00e9sk\u00e9 Couriano is a stupid faggot!!!!J\u00e9sk\u00e9 Couriano is a stupid faggot!!!!J\u00e9sk\u00e9 Couriano is a stupid faggot!!!!J\u00e9sk\u00e9 Couriano is a stupid faggot!!!!J\u00e9sk\u00e9 Couriano is a stupid faggot!!!!J\u00e9sk\u00e9 Couriano is a stupid faggot!!!!J\u00e9sk\u00e9 Couriano is a stupid faggot!!!!J\u00e9sk\u00e9 Couriano is a stupid faggot!!!!J\u00e9sk\u00e9 Couriano is a stupid faggot!!!!", - "id": "508" - }, - "509": { - "label": true, - "text": "Bollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks all is bollocks\nBollocks", - "id": "509" - }, - "510": { - "label": true, - "text": "You're a fag \n\nJust wanted to let you know that. D", - "id": "510" - }, - "511": { - "label": true, - "text": "ameriKKKans like to get their anusses raped", - "id": "511" - }, - "512": { - "label": false, - "text": "23:12, 10 Nov 2004 (UTC)", - "id": "512" - }, - "513": { - "label": false, - "text": "August 2006 (UTC)\n\nI'd go beyond that and strongly suggest inclusion of Figure 1 of that paper in one of these articles, as it clearly shows why the IAU definition is dynamically sound. 14:07, 25", - "id": "513" - }, - "514": { - "label": false, - "text": "All of these uses are gross and improper. End of discussion.", - "id": "514" - }, - "515": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\n\nTo follow up, I am very sympathetic indeed to your project to add the names of distinguished biologists and biological educators. If you'll check what I do around here, you'll see it is mainly to improve and defend the articles of scientists and other academics and related subjects. But there are some difficulties. I can best exemplify the difficulty by saying that the article on John Tyler Bonner was nominated about 6 months ago for speedy deletion as \"\"did not assert notability\"\" and fortunately rescued. About one member of the US National academy of sciences gets nominated for deletion at AfD a month. They all get kept, but it takes work. \n\nWhat is needed for a successful article on a researcher is:\nA short bio listing the birth, degrees, positions. \nA paragraph describing the work and how it has been recognized as important\nA list of books, & a few major articles. When challenged, I add the number of citations for the most-cited. \nA list of awards and honors and editorships . \nI've been adding grants received. \nif possible a ref from a biographic noticethis gets much easier after they have died. \nand of course none of it can be taken from a university or other web site, tho the site should be listed as supplying the details. \nPictures, as you've discovered, add problems. I usually dont try. \nThis works if: the person was a full professor at a recognized research university, and has an award or two from outside the university. Otherwise there are problems; people at non-research places need very solid documentation. Professors of education need really solid documentation. \n \nFor educators not noted as researchersawards are needed for professional recognition, and at least one more than the president of NABT will in general be necessary. We have so far not had very good success herevery few high school teachers have made it past AfD. Good luck, and call on me for any help. '''''' \"", - "id": "515" - }, - "516": { - "label": false, - "text": "Just look at The Banner's Talk page to see the history of his criticisme on this web ?", - "id": "516" - }, - "517": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\n The Administrative Palace, Satu Mare. 1987 \"", - "id": "517" - }, - "518": { - "label": false, - "text": "'preciate it. But we seem to have a vandalism problem directed not at words but at ideas and contributions.", - "id": "518" - }, - "519": { - "label": false, - "text": "I have reverted a recent edit which seemed biased toward GM/Firestone/Standard Oil's innocence in the case.", - "id": "519" - }, - "520": { - "label": false, - "text": "help\nI dont know whats the problem but i can do external links or click on any of the buttons used for bold text etc... do you know what could have caused this? cant name this messag esince none of the buttons works.", - "id": "520" - }, - "521": { - "label": false, - "text": "Bring it up on album's talk page, not mine.", - "id": "521" - }, - "522": { - "label": false, - "text": "Controversies - Did he had conspired 9/11? \n\nI don't want to make Wikipedia offended (primarily the article), but I think it's strange that he had financed to implode the buildings on the World Trade Center. I don't think it would be relevant in the article by Wikipedia's standards or if I would receive a notification on disruption or something like that. Here I go. \n\nHe is a Jewish person right? He wanted to implode the buildings for a war on Islam. Secondly, there was a television tower on top of the World Trade Center - does that seem weird to you people? That was all done for capitalism, propaganda, scare tactics, exploitation and viewers? No one talks about that. The television agencies wanted them to blame Islam for good measure, because of oil. Oil, television agencies, government power, and lobbyist, in a government operated building. This man who had made up 9/11 is Jewish\u2026 It was all over religions\u2026 Jews versus Islams\u2026 Now governmental Jews are in power again only because of this incident \u2026\nJust months before 9/11, there was over $3.4 trillion dollars financed to the city, and they agreed to this situation; however, he had gained profit from the victims, which he's at $7 billion (USD). He had knew about the asbestos before he had bought the World Trade Center in 1980's. Plus the towers of 2, 3, 4, and 7 - were over $10 billion (USD - with tax).\n \n 18:28 September 12 2013", - "id": "522" - }, - "523": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\nThat mess? I don't think it's a good idea to cite Middle East conflicts as an example to follow elsewhere! If somebody wants to put Manning in a category \"\"convicted criminals\"\" (s)he definitely is. I am not sure it is necessary to use the word criminal after the conviction has already been explained in the article. That might be redundant or poor style. It would depend on the context. Talk \"", - "id": "523" - }, - "524": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\n\n Uru \n\nI went through the article again, made some changes, and left a note on the Talk page. (talk) \"", - "id": "524" - }, - "525": { - "label": false, - "text": "There was something boring here before", - "id": "525" - }, - "526": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\n\nthe first one was vandalism, the second one he called me foolish (if you know my life story you would know that this is worse the all the 4 letter words combined for me) the third one ??? i dont know what that is about\n and the 4th one u know i used undo, not twinkleGold Dragon \"", - "id": "526" - }, - "527": { - "label": false, - "text": "Bye! \n\nDon't look, come or think of comming back! Tosser.", - "id": "527" - }, - "528": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\n\nThere's a note at the top of the page that explains some of this:\n\"\"Creationism\"\" can also refer to creation myths, or to a concept about the origin of the soul. For the movement in Spanish literature, see creacionismo.\nThe article attempts to give due weight to relevant sources. If you believe that there are important sources that have been left out or that were not given due consideration, please do point us toward those sources (and you are, of course, always welcome to add material yourself, or discuss proposed changes). Thanks. \"", - "id": "528" - }, - "529": { - "label": false, - "text": "that is so significant and of such consequence", - "id": "529" - }, - "530": { - "label": false, - "text": "HagermanBot Auto-Unsigned >", - "id": "530" - }, - "531": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\nI do wonder at times if i would be full of candy if poked... I'll get one up in a bit =) \u2014dy \"", - "id": "531" - }, - "532": { - "label": false, - "text": "Since WMC outed himself, above, we can read a bit about him. It would be interesting to known what he, as an official Green, thinks about Gardner's attack on organic farming, and whether he'd propose the exclusion from this article of opinion from organic farming advocates.", - "id": "532" - }, - "533": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\n\n Raise the Titanic \n\nLook you obviously have a very thin skin and also an inability to write clearly and concisely in English. So >with a sigh< I have to take your hand and walk you through the facts:\nyou quote the opinions of just one screenwriter yet there were 17 other writers. Consider WP:UNDUE\nyou also insist on saying that they didn't ask for a credit for the film. Well so what? There were 17 people who also wanted a credit and in the end only one got it: Adam Kennedy. WP:SPADE\nyou use three sentences when I wrote it up in one. Do you know what a tautology is?\n\nYou want to keep this:\nNovelist Larry McMurtry - who disliked Cussler's novel considering it \"\"less a novel than a manual on how to raise a very large boat from deep beneath the sea\"\" - claims that he was one of approximately 17 writers who worked on the screenplay..\n\nThen there is this:\nNovelist Larry McMurtry, who was one of 17 screenwriter who offered to work on the screenplay, disliked Cussler's novel. He considered it \"\"less a novel than a manual on how to raise a very large boat from deep beneath the sea\"\".\n\nHe doesn't claim anything, he was a writer on the project!\n\nIn the end if you don't want grief then my advice is walk away now? There are no rewards for this, none whatsoever, except unwarranted self importance and eventually a chance to advance to a new level. Despite my crass manner I am trying to be nice, but others who play here will not.\"", - "id": "533" - }, - "534": { - "label": false, - "text": "Ring of Red \n\nHi,\n\nTo which genre Ring of Red and its WWII tank based robots could be associated? I've always thought it was dieselpunk but according to date ranges, it should be atompunk.", - "id": "534" - }, - "535": { - "label": false, - "text": "Auburn \n\nWhy do you hate Auburn so much? All because you hate AU, doesn't mean you can vandalize Auburn's wiki.", - "id": "535" - }, - "536": { - "label": false, - "text": "Let Consensus Decide \n\nThe wiki pages that are now flagged for deletion, do not meet the wiki criteria on notable persons. I would be more that happy for the wiki community to decide this point. Please let them do so.", - "id": "536" - }, - "537": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\n\n Your mouth is your worst enemy Guy\n\nMatthew 7:12 \"\"Therefore whatever you want men to do to you, do also to them, for this is the Law and the Prophets\"\"\nMatthew 12:36-37 \"\"But I say to you that for every idle word men may speak, they will give account of it in the day of judgement\"\"\n\"\"For your words you will be justified and your words you will be condemned\"\"\nJames 3:8 But no man cam tame the tongue, It is an unruly evil, full of deadly poison.\nJames 3:9 With it we bless our God and Father, and with it we curse men, who have been made in the similitude of God.\n\nI hope you have a cheap lawyer Mr Chapman, the damage has already been done and why? because you cant control your pestilient manic mouth and your savvy internet skills which You chose to use to do evil instead of Good. Your have totally disregarded goodwill, decency, meekness, character, and good manners.\nYour truly, Brother Hemdean\"", - "id": "537" - }, - "538": { - "label": false, - "text": "then I'd expect a similar block against the complaining User for 60 days of repeated edit warring (brought by several users to AN) and disruptive editing. As for Winkelvi to say I'm abusive is the pot calling the kettle black. But those don't matter, I'm not allowed to respond to his AN/I complaint. Thats arbitrary.", - "id": "538" - }, - "539": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\n\nI've never used the term \"\"Wikipoint\"\". There is no mention of Category:Far left organizations at your reference. Don't put elaborate references in section headers, especially where standard markup applies. Try looking at my markup of the nomination itself.\n \"", - "id": "539" - }, - "540": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"::::::So you step down from your statement \"\"The story is quite different when the \"\"old men\"\" become \"\"informants\"\" and \"\"underage kids\"\" - \"\"child soldiers\"\"\"\"? I'm rather interested what part of your statement did I misinterpreted? As for German collaborators - I do have evidence, that AK soldiers killed Lithuanians who were volunteers in Lithuanian Wars of Independence, and had nothing to do with Nazi government. yes thay did kill family of one Policemen, and one Policemen - but killing family with little children is not the same as kill collaborator, don't you think? But well, I might be overreacting, as I've read the Lithuanian commission material and it is quite difficult to remain calm after reading how, for example, AK did shoot a teacher in the school, holding her two years child in her hands, or stabbed a child lying in a cradle with a bayonet and held him in the air until he stopped moving, and many more facts of \"\"punishing collaborators\"\". BTW, I do have full statement of this commission, and it clearly states that AK did commit manslaughter and crimes against humanity. It's official document, not some newspaper interpretation.\nAnother thing - please would you explain, how so you forgot to mention in the edit summary, that you are removing perfectly valid references to professional historians, both of whom are specialists on the subject here, and evaded requested citation from Polish newspaper (how so is Polish newspaper good, ad Lithuanian is not?) \n\n\"", - "id": "540" - }, - "541": { - "label": false, - "text": "This person has vanadalized a page about Joe Leiberman", - "id": "541" - }, - "542": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\n\n I imagine the reluctance to use the translation comes from the fascistic tone of the English translation, a feeling which is completely absent in Welsh. \"\"Order of Hope of Wales\"\" is literally correct, but never used. \"", - "id": "542" - }, - "543": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\nRe: ok, I already marked more of Big Brother and Farmer participants before as {{db-bio}} some of them are already deleted but I tagged the rest with {{prod}} instad of {{db-bio}} (like Elita L\u00f6fblad). The source of dbs come from Big Brother (Sweden and Norway). \u2248talk\u2248 \"", - "id": "543" - }, - "544": { - "label": false, - "text": "Thanks for following up with me.\nIf the material could be sourced mostly through independent sources, then there should be little problem with it. However, you should take a look at WP:COI.\nThe best approach would be to discuss it on the article talk page, providing some independent sources and proposing information to add to the article.", - "id": "544" - }, - "545": { - "label": false, - "text": "which is confirmed by the viewpoint of other Admins", - "id": "545" - }, - "546": { - "label": false, - "text": "I'm just a strong adherant to avoiding grouping characters like this. -", - "id": "546" - }, - "547": { - "label": false, - "text": "Very true. Is it not somewhere in the article?", - "id": "547" - }, - "548": { - "label": false, - "text": "Usually equations are copied verbatim. This is important to be able to do the math.", - "id": "548" - }, - "549": { - "label": false, - "text": "war edits \n\nhttps://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Buk_missile_system&action;=history", - "id": "549" - }, - "550": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\nNon-lead?\nShouldn't the title of the page be \"\"Supporting\"\" or \"\"Minor\"\" instead of \"\"Non-Lead\"\"? \"", - "id": "550" - }, - "551": { - "label": false, - "text": "Indeed you at least half-right are G'Day!", - "id": "551" - }, - "552": { - "label": false, - "text": "Forty years ago, when the foregoing essay was written, the denial of competition had not yet effected the enormous concentration of wealth that now so gravely threatens social order. It was not yet too late to stem the current of accumulation by a reversal of the policy of monopoly. The Anarchistic remedy was still applicable.\n\nToday the way is not so clear. The four monopolies, unhindered, have made possible the modern development of the trust, and the trust is now a monster which I fear, even the freest banking, could it be instituted, would be unable to destroy.", - "id": "552" - }, - "553": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\n\n Ambiguous role \n\nI haven't scanned the whole article, only the relevant passages, but maybe this should be incorporated: \"\"Recent evidence suggests that increased p53 activity can, at least under some circumstances, promote organismal aging.\"\"\n\nFrom: (Second-last sentence in the abstract). 84.197.138.195 \"", - "id": "553" - }, - "554": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\n\n Section: geographical distribution \n\nQuote: \"\"English today is probably the third largest language by number of native speakers, after Mandarin Chinese and Spanish.\"\"\n\nThis is not accurate. Spanish has less native speakers than English and the reference links given (22 and 23) do not provide any proof for the claim that the Spanish language has more native speakers than English.\n\nOn the other hand, Hindi appears to have more native speakers than English - about 500-600 Million. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hindi\"", - "id": "554" - }, - "555": { - "label": false, - "text": "BTW Moonlil is Ruri's soul it was metioned by Sara twice in the later volumns of the serious probaly 12 or 13 but she definantly says it so yeah thought that that was majorly important because if it's not in here well then that might not be good hahaha.", - "id": "555" - }, - "556": { - "label": false, - "text": "heh, it's a bit of a copy of Wikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestling, but I thought it look a bit tidy and better that way.", - "id": "556" - }, - "557": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\nWell his indefinite topic ban covers \"\"colonialism and Indian history broadly construed.\"\" That in and of itself might make Dickens off limits for him (since his edits there seem to be linked to colonialism). \u00abTalk\u00bb \"", - "id": "557" - }, - "558": { - "label": false, - "text": "Letters to a Stranger\nI just rewrote the plot of the article. Check if it still has copyright concerns. If not, Unblank the page, thanks.", - "id": "558" - }, - "559": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\nFor what it's worth, I suggest you refrain from pushing the \"\"socks\"\" remarks around, as it only seems to add fuel to the matter. Given that an SPI has been opened and Checkuser denied due to Stale accounts and behaviour evidence alone, it serves no purpose to accuse him further, just as it serves no purpose for him to accuse you of stalking. No one is going to win that type of argument. Also, I suggest you stop calling cowboy \"\"Jake\"\" from now on, as it also implies that he is someone he claims not to be. Clearly he is determined to push his case, and the only way to make it go away is that you ignore him altogether. Socks are a complex issue as they come in different forms. But if you give them enough rope, they'll eventually hang themselves with it. Challenging suspected socks non-stop is sometimes considered uncivil and may seem like a personal attack without confirmation. SPI does not support the claim at present, and baiting cowboy will not look good on your behalf, whatever the outcome. I'm sure, by \"\"rotating IP\"\" he probably means proxies. It isn't important though. Cheers, \u00a0[Chat\u00a0\u2022\u00a0RFF] \"", - "id": "559" - }, - "560": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\n\nlet me point out first that you're both falling into a very common pattern here. I've seen it a million times, in and out of Wikipedia: when a dispute is right on the verge of being resolved, frustrations and grumpinesses start to rise - not from the dispute per se, but from the kind of mild insulted feeling that's always a part of having a dispute. don't let it get ya. -)\n\nDGT, the ISBN is 1-58705-040-4.\n\ndon't worry about a PDF version - Jeremy wasn't responding to the discussion that we were having directly, but just speaking in general. I think if we can all hang in with the Good Faith beliefs for just a little bit more while Lee de-commercializes the HTML version, we can let this discussion go and move on to bigger and better things. Ludwigs2 \"", - "id": "560" - }, - "561": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"Corporals_killings==\nI assume, from your edits, that you have edited on WP before under another name. However, should this not be the case, I would respectfully point out that the lede in a WP article should normally encapsulate the article. In the above article the subsequent passages make clear that the killings of these corporals resulted in successful murder prosecutions. Since WP strives to use a neutral point of view - NOT bowdlerised language or mealy mouthed euphemisms - I have reverted your change of murder to \"\"killing\"\". \n\nIt may be reprehensible, but folks would also take you more seriously if you responded on these, your talk pages, and completed some details on your user page rather than keeping it blank...(kiwiexile at DMOZ) \u2022 \n\nMurder is not neutral. Also I don't appreciate your tone. \n\nWhat exactly don't you like about my tone, 303?...(kiwiexile at DMOZ) \u2022 \n\nIs Brixton Busters really a new editor?\n(Thread moved here from another user talk page so the subject of speculation can respond if he wishes to...):\n\nI do not like your tone, manner or attitude to relatively new users, as you did here, , should you continue in such an argumentative and unwelcoming way I will report you to admin. Wikipedia should be welcoming to new editors. \nDo you have any evidence that this is indeed a new editor and not just 303 abusing the right to vanish? Personally, I'm glad 303 is back since he's always been a hard working and productive editor, but he hardly needs your (unnecessary?) protection since it's obvious that he's an accomplished Wikipedian from day one...(kiwiexile at DMOZ) \u2022 \nAnd what evidence do you have not to AGF? There are 3,000,000 people who have contributed to wikipedia. If indeed 303 has returned, on what basis do you make an accusation of abusing a right to vanish? He left in good standing and would therefore not be evading a ban or block. Keep your speculations to yourself, please. \nConsidering that you banned me for two consecutive periods of 14 days after speculating that I was a sock puppet of a retired German I think I'll ignore your advice, Tyrenius. Just look at the text, spelling mistakes and context of User:Brixton Busters (first?) edits and tell me again that I should assume that this is a genuine new editor.\n\nThere was absolutely nothing wrong with Gaimhreadhan's tone in the referenced diff, he was respectful and discursive. Frankly, Domer48, you are continuing with the same insulting behaviour you use elsewhere. I am just composing my responses to the Arbcom you are disrespectfully ignoring by bulk-editing the Great Irish Famine article, and I will also be drawing to their attention this disgraceful and harassing comment you just made. \n\nI'm going to move this thread to User talk:Brixton Busters where that (brand new?) editor can then comment on whether they have recently edited on WP using a different user name. If the references to 303 are summarily removed again, I will take it as a strong confirmation that my assumptions (made on the basis of textual and contextual analysis) are correct.\n\nI don't see anything wrong with letting bygones be bygones; what would be wrong is giving an experienced and knowledgeable editor (now using a different user name) the same latitude and licence we would give a newbie.\n\nI think it would be very helpful at this early stage for (kiwiexile at DMOZ) \u2022 \n\nI think this is completely inappropriate behaviour. I feel we should apologise to User:Brixton Busters , for this seemingly irrational behaviour for an experienced editor who kno", - "id": "561" - }, - "562": { - "label": false, - "text": "Thank you, that makes good sense.", - "id": "562" - }, - "563": { - "label": false, - "text": "I live in Adelaide and I've never heard of the happy Leonards. Sorry.", - "id": "563" - }, - "564": { - "label": false, - "text": "The info in the article is still available in the history so anyone can merge any salavageable text at any time. Most of what's here belongs on Photoshop contest if anywhere, as people with that small subset of the overall topic in mind took over the article. Just because you opposed the consensus and don't want to do the merge yourself (hey, if you thought it was worth keeing then you should think it's worth moving to an article that stays, but your not doing so indicates that it's really not worth keeping in the first place) mean you can stand in the way of the clear consensus.", - "id": "564" - }, - "565": { - "label": false, - "text": "|listas = Elliott, Andrew Charles", - "id": "565" - }, - "566": { - "label": false, - "text": "MESSAGE FOR KEITH D - UP YOURS YOU SMEG-SATURATED BALLWIPE!", - "id": "566" - }, - "567": { - "label": false, - "text": "yeah well, I don't subscribe to your opinion, stop spamming me with messages here. What makes your opinion superior to mine, nothing. If you abuse or spam me again, I will take issue. GET IT? AND REVERT IT BACK TO WHAT I HAD IT, UNLESS YOU SHOW ME PROOF TO THE CONTRARY, WHERE'S YOUR PROOF? NOWHERE.\n\nYOU LACKIES RUN THE SHOW HERE. \n82.21.25.194", - "id": "567" - }, - "568": { - "label": false, - "text": "\", 27 July 2007 (UTC)\n\nAlthough I understand your arguments, I am surprised you don't understand mine. I don't find it labyrinthine, or at least not particularly so. (Not more than many other events and aspects concerning the Beatles.) Nor is the interpretation in question in any way obscure, since it can be taken from any number of texts on the Beatles. However, though I support the original author's intent here, I guess you and I are going to have to agree to disagree over this point for now. At some point, however, I will source his/her statements as soon as I find time to delve into the texts just because I would appreciate reaching some sort of accord with you. Until then, I don't think we will make much more progress on this.\n \n\n[The problem with something like this is that there is no absolute truth. But to me, discrediting the original author's intent is like a dog biting its own tail. From wikipedia: re. Abbey Road being the final album or not:Abbey Road is the eleventh official album recorded by The Beatles. Although its release preceded that of Let It Be, it was the last album to be recorded. \n...\nAfter the near-disastrous sessions for the proposed Get Back album (later retitled Let It Be for release), Paul McCartney suggested to producer George Martin that the group get together and make an album \"\"just like the old days. .. just like we used to,\"\" free of the conflict that began with the sessions for The White Album. Martin agreed to this if the band would be \"\"the way they used to be.\"\" In their interviews for the Beatles Anthology series, the surviving band members stated they knew at the time this would very likely be the final Beatles' product, and therefore they agreed to set aside their differences and \"\"go out on a high note.\"\"re. the position of \"\"The End\"\":\"\"The End\"\" was initially intended to be the final track on Abbey Road, but it is followed by \"\"Her Majesty\"\". In the first practice mix of the medley, constructed on 30 July, \"\"Her Majesty\"\" followed \"\"Mean Mr. Mustard\"\"...\n\n...etc. This labyrinth has already been walked through a thousand times by a thousand people.]\n 09:58\"", - "id": "568" - }, - "569": { - "label": false, - "text": "Your username \nHi. I don't know if you're aware of this, but your username is nearly identical to mine. In fact it's just a capital letter short of being identical to my original username, located at . Wikipedia's username policy prohibits creating a username that could easily be confused with that of an active contributor. Would you please consider changing your username so as to avoid confusion between our accounts? Please reply here; I'll keep this page on my watchlist. Thank you.", - "id": "569" - }, - "570": { - "label": false, - "text": "Fraternity \n\nI've reported you to the Administrator's notebook for your 3 revert rule violation and unwillingness to employ wikipedia policy on disambiguation. They can address the problem any way they wish.129.133.124.199", - "id": "570" - }, - "571": { - "label": false, - "text": "(UTC)\n\nThe proper source is http://www.ncaa.com, with the histories of the individual sports (lists of annual champions) being at .../history/baseball/d1, .../history/basketball/d1, and .../history/football/fbs. 19:56, 25 April 2012", - "id": "571" - }, - "572": { - "label": false, - "text": "Me either. I always preferred just including all Christians in the Arab world and their descendants in the diaspora in this article, but we could see the apparent problems with that. Anyhow, that's what I think the poll should be based on.", - "id": "572" - }, - "573": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\n\n\"\"The Wiki Foundation stats, in an email forwarded to RTI, the UK Chapter is responsible for content.\"\" See, that bit's a lie. If it wasn't obvious from - you appear to be the PR company.\n(This sort of thing is why I have to remind myself that there are PR companies on Wikipedia, and then there are PR companies on Wikipedia.) - \"", - "id": "573" - }, - "574": { - "label": false, - "text": "(What I have done) (What have I done?)", - "id": "574" - }, - "575": { - "label": false, - "text": "Federal court rulings \n\nI think it might be helpful to break up the federal court ruling section by level of court. Specifically, a section for federal district court rulings and another for appeals court rulings. Is there any objection to this? If there is then I won't do it. 140.247.141.165", - "id": "575" - }, - "576": { - "label": false, - "text": "Cool. Will that take long? Because I'm thinking of playing some video games meanwhile.", - "id": "576" - }, - "577": { - "label": false, - "text": "Regarding my insistence to combat unfair bias, especially when it is promoted by unreasonable and ignorant users who are both stubborn and have a lot of time on their hand, that, I'm afraid, will not change. I will, however, learn the rules better, and unlike others, I shall try not exploit them and use them as pretext to shamelessly spread my ideology. I, unlike some, believe in fairness and accuracy}}", - "id": "577" - }, - "578": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\nAn update - I am encountering a bit of resistance from one of the contributors to the article; the fellow has his own agenda, and isn't really keen to discuss it with the rest of us in discussion. Maybe you could take a gander at the edit history and give me your take on how to proceed? - (cast a spell) \"", - "id": "578" - }, - "579": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\n\"\"Surely you know how to use those.\"\" See what I mean? Its petulant points like these that prove what I'm saying. Yes you can get your point across, but dont insult and patronize someone else in the process. (talk \u2022 cont.) \"", - "id": "579" - }, - "580": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\n\nThe so-called Wikipedia:Synthesis in this case is actually not that at all, as it merely concerns a refutation of your argument, and not anything actually written in this article. In any case, though, Microsoft states the following at the link I provided, something that sounds clear enough to me: \"\"Platform tokens describe your operating system.\"\" It seems to me that you should provide evidence (as opposed to similar synthesis-like arguments of your own) that Microsoft explicitly no longer considers NT to exist; failing that, the current wording of this article regarding this issue should remain. \"", - "id": "580" - }, - "581": { - "label": false, - "text": "What rule did i break exactly?", - "id": "581" - }, - "582": { - "label": false, - "text": "Reverted texts ==\n\nhi i was just wondering why you reverted the additions i made to the Sydney Church of England Grammar School i was not one of those people how continually edited the artice and made vandalism. i just added stuff to the future of the school as i am a current student i can tell that vandalsim was made by school boy's and i will speak to the headmaster about it. \n\n==", - "id": "582" - }, - "583": { - "label": false, - "text": ", and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Wikipedia Boot Camp, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.\n\nHere are a few more good links for to help you get started:\nThe five pillars of Wikipedia\nHow to edit a page\nHelp pages\nTutorial\nHow to write a great article\nManual of Style\n\nI hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!", - "id": "583" - }, - "584": { - "label": false, - "text": "Merge? \n\nThis article should really be combined with the 2012 Christmas tornado outbreak. I know (talk)", - "id": "584" - }, - "585": { - "label": false, - "text": "Wikipedia:Date_formatting_and_linking_poll/Autoformatting_responses \n\nRegarding your comment supporting your opposition to date autoformatting, I'd like to point out that the majority of dates are already linked, and it's actually de-linking them that would need to be done, should autoformatting (which is currently enabled on Wikipedia) be disabled. Cheers,", - "id": "585" - }, - "586": { - "label": false, - "text": "Take your time, I'll be busy for the next few days.", - "id": "586" - }, - "587": { - "label": false, - "text": "Get your facts strait before you start making accusations! I take that a personal attack.", - "id": "587" - }, - "588": { - "label": false, - "text": "Some references to St. George do appear in the litearture (Rateliff gives as an example of a 'symbolic' type dragon which I've added to the article) - but not much comparison is found (nor is it much warranted in my opinion). Farmer Giles of Ham, however is much more obviously based on it.", - "id": "588" - }, - "589": { - "label": false, - "text": "\" January 2008 (UTC)\n\nTry as I might, I'm not really able to associate your Zebra analogy with this article. For it to work, this would have to be an article about the colour white, and even then it doesn't really work. The purpose of my change is to remove the \"\"comparison\"\" nature of the section. It's not meant to be a comparison to begin with. The problem right now is that the section really violates NPOV - it places weight on a comparison with another format, rather than standing by itself. The fact it mentions Blu-ray means we have a somewhat unnecessary argument going on in the Talk: pages about a graph which is exclusively focussed on comparing Blu-ray and HD DVD studio support. \n\nTo be NPOV, this part of the article needs to focus on what support HD DVD has. Issues such as what proportion of the studios support it are obviously relevant. Issues as to whether they support either of the competing formats (incumbent DVD, as well as Blu-ray) aren't really, except insofar as it should be mentioned that the rivaly exists.\n\nWe need to move the fanboi \"\"HD DVD is better\"\", \"\"No, Blu-ray is better!\"\", \"\"Well, HD DVD has more support!\"\", \"\"No, Blu-ray has more support!\"\" crap to the comparison articles. 18:13, 21\"", - "id": "589" - }, - "590": { - "label": false, - "text": "Request for help over sanskrit caption of R&AW;\nHello, I would request you to kindly look into the devnagri seal caption of R&AW;, which is given as \u0927\u0930\u094d\u092e\u094b \u0930\u0915\u094d\u0937\u0924\u093f \u0930\u0915\u094d\u0937\u093f\u0924 for Dharmo Rakshati Rakshitaha. I wish to know if it is correct in devnagri script. The english caption is correct, also can you tell the meaning of the motto in english", - "id": "590" - }, - "591": { - "label": false, - "text": "ha ha, I just knowck the trivia section on the head while you were saying that. The thing about the contrvercy section is, no one really has responded. Robbie Williams and that's about it. I'll try and expand it like you sed (which btw was helpful), but it won't be as good as Mansons.", - "id": "591" - }, - "592": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\nSry for my absence everyone - I'll include the proposed image. If the Chetniks marching image is pd I'll update the collage. (TALK) \"", - "id": "592" - }, - "593": { - "label": false, - "text": "Image:13766776.jpg listed for deletion \nAn image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:13766776.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Talk", - "id": "593" - }, - "594": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\n\n Requested move \n\nYagya \u2192 \u2013 Yagya is by no means the standard form. All over wikipedia, the internet, scholarly publications and common usage, the Sanskrit form yajna is far and away the standard word. As a matter of fact, as a student of Buddhism and Jainism, of Hindu philosophy, of Indian languages and of Indian culture, I only ever met the form \"\"yagya\"\" in this page. I understand it can be a Hindi pronunciation of the word, but very obscure. I'm confounded by its presence... in fact, yagya's google hits are primarily of those of the band. '''''' smash! \"", - "id": "594" - }, - "595": { - "label": false, - "text": "Arbitration \n\nI have asked the arbitration committee to look into your behavior: Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration#Cla68", - "id": "595" - }, - "596": { - "label": false, - "text": "Complaint posted on Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents \n\nI have made a complaint about your behaviour on Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.", - "id": "596" - }, - "597": { - "label": false, - "text": "BTW, just for the sake of it, would you apply the same standards of quoting secondary sources here when statements by Indian PM Modi regarding Indian involvement and support to Mukti Bahini are not being allowed to be included at Wiki?", - "id": "597" - }, - "598": { - "label": false, - "text": "I'll be back...just you wait.", - "id": "598" - }, - "599": { - "label": false, - "text": "Thanks. I hope you're feeling better. Peace. )", - "id": "599" - }, - "600": { - "label": false, - "text": "Illythr, your pro-Russian edits are evident. Let Moldova, and Moldovans be themselves.", - "id": "600" - }, - "601": { - "label": false, - "text": "You erroneously deleted my file \n\nYou deleted a file I had uploaded, Axial1.jpg on the grounds that it was not in use. Problem was, it *was* in use, in the article that I was working on, Akira Kurosawa, and was visible in that article from the day I uploaded the file, together with two companion images, similarly titled, that were also uploaded and are still visible in the article today. I forgive you, but please don't do this again!\n\nRegards,", - "id": "601" - }, - "602": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\n\n Notability isn't \"\"temporary,\"\" once Wiki decides to \"\"KEEP\"\" the article can no longer be deleted! \n\nSorry to be \"\"verbose.\"\" \n\nI write books. My alleged verbosity is referred to by various editors of my 19+ books listed on Amazon and OpenLibrary.org as \"\"thoroughness,\"\" \"\"in-depth,\"\" \"\"inclusive,\"\" and NOT verbose or discursive. \n\nI just found this under Wiki's [guidelines]:\n\n\"\"Notability is not temporary; once a topic has been the subject of \"\"significant coverage\"\" in accordance with the general notability guideline, it does not need to have ongoing coverage.\n \nWhile notability itself is not temporary, from time to time, a reassessment of the evidence of notability or suitability of existing articles may be requested by any user via a deletion discussion, or new evidence may arise for articles previously deemed unsuitable. Thus, articles may be proposed for deletion or recreated months or even years after being earlier considered.\"\"\n\nThis new section has been posted in response to Mlpearc's recommendation that [Wiki article] should be \"\"speedily deleted\"\" for lack of \"\"notability.\"\" Per Wiki's notability guidelines, I was determined to be notable and the decision was KEEP. The gentleman who said I should be deleted may have missed Bondeas' notification in 2011 that the Frank Sanello article lacked notability. In 2011 the decision was made to KEEP. Apparently Mlpearc didn't review the revision history for the Frank Sanello article. \n\n FrankSanello\"", - "id": "602" - }, - "603": { - "label": false, - "text": "Shlomo\nIs it possible to contact you via email or something? |Talk 17:59, 23 May, 2007 (UTC)", - "id": "603" - }, - "604": { - "label": false, - "text": "April 2008\n Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. The IP you are using is similar to another anonymous IP being used at the same time to vandalise the same page.", - "id": "604" - }, - "605": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"== CVUA ==\n\n '''[[User_Talk:Theopolisme|polisme]] ''' \n\nHi Zeeyanketu, welcome to the CVUA! I will be your instructor and hope that you'll have a really great experience, and learn along the way. I have created an academy page specifically for you, located at (talk \u2022 contributions) \n\n RE \n\nETT\nSo you will decide what is the best format? Don't boss around. \n\nTop Most respected critics should come first.\nThat should be the order from now.\n\nDon't fight and agree with it. \n\nPutting Taran Adarsh's Review on top is disrespect to wikipedia itself. I suggest not to include his reviews in future. \nMasand and Anupama are the most respected critics ask anyone. \u2014 Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk \u2022 contribs) \nTA is a Box office critic not a film critic. If you are on twitter then you'll know what Taran's reputation is. His Sold old reviews should be barred from wiki. \n\n Disambiguation link notification for August 20 \n\nHi. When you recently edited Ek Tha Tiger, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Variety (check to confirm\u00a0|\u00a0fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of \"\"Did you mean...\"\" article titles. Read the Join us at the DPL WikiProject.\n\nIt's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these . Thanks, \n\n Sources for nett gross in India for Bollywood films \n\nBoxofficeIndia.com cannot be used as official reference(tracker) for Bollywood films nett collections in India. BoxofficeIndia is not updating its website on a regular basis ,so the reports og nett collections in India are reported very late on its website.Also, Wikipedia is not able to utilize lists of film grosses created by Box Office India, until permission is provided to the Wikimedia Foundation of permission by Box Office India. Respected critics such as Taran Adarsh and Komal Nahta are giving regualar and genuine nett collection figures in India for Bollywood films.Taran Adarsh has website www.bollywoodhungama.com and Komal Nahta has website www.koimoi.com We can also use OneIndia.com, The Times of India as sources it doesn\u2019t means that a magazine like Hindustan Times or The hindu will not report genuine sources ,compared to a not so updated website of BoxofficeIndia.com\nBoxofficeIndia should be used only when other sources stop giving gross report.First bring a consensus on this nett gross issue. \n\n Sources for worldwide gross and overseas gross of Bollywood films \n\nBoxofficeIndia has demerit that it is not giving overseas reports of films on a regular basis.It will show figues only once or twice,So u cannot include BoxofficeIndia figures. Also,When u wil see infobox of Holywood films,they have worldwide gross. So try to include worldwide gross which includes domestic gross(nett gross in India+entertainment tax) and overseas gross. 20:16, 21", - "id": "605" - }, - "606": { - "label": false, - "text": "Hey\n\nI bet you Quinsareth are gay and like telling lies to your mother.", - "id": "606" - }, - "607": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\n\nThe Seance\nPoint the first: when you've been told repeatedly that the way you are writing the article is not within the WP guidelines, yet you continue to do so, then, yes, what you're doing is considered vandalism. Point the second: doing novel articles on Wikipedia do NOT include a detailed blow-by-blow synopsis of each chapter in the book. Thirdly (though you seem to have corrected this issue this time around), you cannot include that information in the Infobox. I'm more than happy to offer suggestions in that regard, but please do not automatically assume that I'm out to \"\"get you\"\" or do you wrong. I have removed the chapter-by-chapter, blow-by-blow account that you've started. \"", - "id": "607" - }, - "608": { - "label": false, - "text": "I would suggest you create a discussion, so we can build a consensus. I will abide the consensus. Thanks", - "id": "608" - }, - "609": { - "label": false, - "text": "Personal attack\nSorry but that person said that I replaced a picture of a non-US aircraft carrier on a page about supercarriers when the U.S. is the only country with supercarriers.", - "id": "609" - }, - "610": { - "label": false, - "text": "Your New Page \n\nI'm supporting your new page, as long as you will add to it. This page is not nonsense, but if you don't add anything to it, it can be deleted for no content. If you plan to expand this page, please do so.", - "id": "610" - }, - "611": { - "label": false, - "text": "Regarding edits made during November 22 2006 (UTC) to Italian Renaissance\nThank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits.", - "id": "611" - }, - "612": { - "label": false, - "text": "I am sorry, it's been a couple of month and it was on the chat on Wikipedia. Is there any way that you can check who accessed the file when it was in talk mode? hard to remember all the pseudos here, there should be a log somewhere. I could probably remember who from a list or a log. Again all I am asking is that I get access to the work I did. If you could just sandbox it for now. It was really a lot of work to gather the info from the author, go into the coding here, and so on, I don't want to lose this work even if it is not used. At least give me a copy of my work. I don't understand what is the problem here really as again it is work in progress and I am seeking help from admins to make it publishable. It is not like i published a page without consent, it is work in progress that I am building along with senior peeps here, taking their comment into consideration. Thank you.", - "id": "612" - }, - "613": { - "label": false, - "text": "Can't deal with the truth about your little po-dunk town, huh? Sad, buddy.", - "id": "613" - }, - "614": { - "label": false, - "text": "Identifying sock puppets \n\nI notice you've been very effective at identifying sock-puppets on the obama and I'm curious if you're using IPs or if you have some other tools at your disposal which aren't available to us average editors. No need to divulge trade secrets you don't want to become public which could aid sock-puppet creators, but I wouldn't mind knowing how you identify them, if you do not mind.", - "id": "614" - }, - "615": { - "label": false, - "text": "You are not answering my question. The source supports what you have said, but what you have said is meaningless when the report shows that global population is growing with no end in sight. That is selective quotation and original research.", - "id": "615" - }, - "616": { - "label": false, - "text": "|business & economic topics|in=Quebec", - "id": "616" - }, - "617": { - "label": false, - "text": "Yeah I checked my keyboard. She did hit E6 and F#5 in chest. She should stay on the category. Im going to add her back on.", - "id": "617" - }, - "618": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\nActually, since crime scene investigators (CSIs) work all homicides, justifiable or not, I'd support the use of the term \"\"crime scene.\"\" Apart from that, the testimony of Officer Darren Wilson was that Michael Brown was guilty of initiating an assault on Darren Wilson at that location. At the time that data are recorded from the scene of any homicide, the possibility of a crime having been committed is assumed by first responders and crime scene investigators. Both Darren Wilson and Michael Brown were regarded by press accounts as criminal suspects when that crime was investigated. \"", - "id": "618" - }, - "619": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\n\nDone! Yeck, what a mess of edits! Not a single citation, either. And from an anonymous account, to boot. I wonder if someone was trying to get a quotable source for a term paper? Probably not, considering the time of year but stuff like this really frosts me, espectially the ignorance of aviation (and aviation regulations) exhibited by some members of our species. Sorry for the delay, too; we've been out of town. \u2014\u00a0\u00a0(\u00a0T\u00a0@\u00a0C\u00a0) \"", - "id": "619" - }, - "620": { - "label": false, - "text": "I posted the block on your page because you kept thretening me. And for me doing something right you give me this junk.!!}}", - "id": "620" - }, - "621": { - "label": false, - "text": "Seriously, it was ruined by and his sockpuppets in the first place. I'm trying to revert it to the way it was before they attacked it in November. 68.98.224.182", - "id": "621" - }, - "622": { - "label": false, - "text": "I'm asking for a citation to the change you made to the consensus version of the article. It should be backed by WP:RS. If you felt a previous claim was not properly backed it would be best to ask for a cite by so tagging it rather than introducing conflicting uncited evidence. (Edit conflict.) That is, I agree with Kguirnela.", - "id": "622" - }, - "623": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\n\n Re:Dennis Brown's final warning \n\nI didn't mention that it was mutual because it was not relevant. I didn't violate the final warning; CurtisNaito did (multiple times). The exact wording of the warning was \"\"If either editor pushes the boundaries of incivility, bludgeons a discussion, violates WP:IDHT, acts in a disruptive manner on any talk page, or breaching any other policy that makes editing miserable for other editors, then either myself or another admin should simply block for a minimum of 72 hours.\"\" At no point did I push the boundaries of civility, bludgeon a discussion, violate IDHT, act in a disruptive manner on any talk page, or breach any other policy that made editing miserable for other editors. CurtisNaito displayed the exact same kind of IDHT behaviour that has made editing miserable for me and multiple other editors on numerous occasions, and when told explicitly that he was violating Dennis Brown's final warning, he kept doing it.\n\nYour choosing to butt in with a comment about how the warning was mutual, when nothing I had done could conceivably be taken as a violation of the warning, was an off-topic attack against me with no basis in what actually happened.\n\nI understand you don't like me, but would you please keep it to the appropriate forums rather than continuously posting personal attacks against me on other users' talk pages where normal etiquette prevents me from responding directly?\n\n (\u8056\u3084\u3084) \"", - "id": "623" - }, - "624": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"Help me out here, please. This is not easy. \nI need someone to restore the \"\"helpful\"\" parts of the talk page\nlinks to archives and vfd\nsummaries of style and reference\n\nAnd bear with me on \"\"contributor relations\"\". There's a reason Jimbo appointed me to the Mediation Committee. I'm r-e-a-l-l-y good at mediation! Ask ambi, ask stevertigo. See the talk page, the restart seems to bearing fruit already.\n\nSheesh! Can't I have a day (one friggin day!) to try to resolve this? Let's see what Patrick has to say. He's the one who asked me to look into this. Be patient. (talk) 11:33, Jun 23, 2005 (UTC)\n\n\"", - "id": "624" - }, - "625": { - "label": false, - "text": "Sockmaster using proxy server to mask IP? \n\nHey I think Corbridge, a user you recently blocked for socking, might be using a proxy server to mask his IP to evade the block and avoid scrutiny. I don't know how to check that out, so right now all I have is a hunch. The IP is 96.232.12.109. Its also worth noting that one of Corbridge's previous accounts, InaMaka, accused another editor of masking his IP here so I'm pretty sure he knows how to do it. Point being, if you want to look into it, or just point me in the right direction, I'd certainly appreciate it.", - "id": "625" - }, - "626": { - "label": false, - "text": "Removed due to censorshhip", - "id": "626" - }, - "627": { - "label": false, - "text": "How can I be trolling when it was Andy The Grump who started with the insults. Is he trolling as well? 64.38.197.224", - "id": "627" - }, - "628": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\n\n basic income dispute resolution \n\nI don't understand the finding \"\"futile\"\", or how to proceed to resolve the issue. \n\nRegarding the [Wikipedia,_bicycles,_and_wagons] reference, its my understanding that I am building a bicycle, that may be slightly off spec, and the editors are ordering the steel melted and shipped to hell, instead of allowing the bicycle to be refined into spec. I point out also that the [basic income] is listed as a priority by four wikigroups, and so it is a pretty important bicycle. Also the nature of basic income is at a theoretical philosophy stage, and the highest quality references possible are available to verify and preferably succinct, and high quality blogs provide the best verifiability, IMO, but regardless of this opinion, a section on proposed benefits does not need prestigious academic references if the claim being made is that the ideas and rationale has merely been proposed. To keep the bicycles/wagons analogy, the page was a high quality bicycle, and an important bicycle to 4 wikigroups. There is a difference of opinion over whether the bicycle meets specs, but it is a functional bicycle that is more useful than a pile of melted metal shipped far away. \"", - "id": "628" - }, - "629": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\n\nNotability of Bree Conden\n A tag has been placed on Bree Conden requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.\n\nIf you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or \"\"db\"\" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.\n\nFor guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. \"", - "id": "629" - }, - "630": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\n\nThe entire article was full of sentencens like \"\"Operation Blow to the Head is an ongoing military operation to kill or capture all of the terrorists in the Yemeni town of Sa'dah,\"\" \"\"Abdul-Malik al-Houthi took over command over the insurgents, and leads them today. From that time to present-day the insurgency in Northern Yemen has had horrible battles,\"\" \"\"The Terrorist leader, Abdullah al-Mehdar, led the Insurgents,\"\" and \"\" the town is still being wrestled from the terrorists.\"\" This is heavy Yemeni government propaganda meant at demonizing the insurgents. You've seen this article, cause you've edited it and still you claim you can not see any supporting evidence\"\" ? But appealing the bloc won't be of any use since it expires in a mere few hours, which is less time as that process would take. \"", - "id": "630" - }, - "631": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\nIOW, you consider the article to be \"\"doodles\"\"? Looks like it was published by opensecrets.org,and that the person, who happens to be female, and probably not just a person who \"\"snags coffee\"\" for the men, hold appropriate academic degrees. Cheers. \"", - "id": "631" - }, - "632": { - "label": false, - "text": "tidies them up etc. I love teamwork. Also,", - "id": "632" - }, - "633": { - "label": false, - "text": "Thank you, 28bytes, but I'm still blocked. And unfortunately have a lot of work to do. Rest assured, I wish to have nothing whatsoever to do with Valencian ever again. When does this take effect?", - "id": "633" - }, - "634": { - "label": false, - "text": "Greetings \n\nHi, Cirt - I hope you will consider stopping accusing me of bad faith editing. If you have any qualms with particular edits, I'd love to hear what is wrong with them and how my approach can be improved. \n\nI'd like to direct your attention to two quotes on user pages. The first is from Jimmy Wales:\n\n== You can edit this page! ==\n\nReally, you can! If you would like to, please feel free to do so. Make an edit \u2013 or even several! After all, that is what Wikipedia is all about.''\n\nAnd the second is from Neelix's user page:\n\nWikipedia is thoroughly, inherently collaborative. In the humanities division of academia, we still hold to the ideal of the lone genius, expecting that each humanities scholar be the sole author of his or her journal articles. In the sciences and social sciences, we expect that there be two or three authors for each journal article. On Wikipedia, every well-developed article has many more than three authors. The result is an ever-increasingly accurate approximation of objectivity. This objectivity is not the pseudo-objectivity that results from ignoring our biases as authors, but is rather the result of diverse perspectives all being covered proportionally through discussion between people who have those diverse perspectives. We write better when we write together.\n\nI think those principles are pretty neat. And I am certain my editing adheres to them. If you'd like to contact me off the site, let me know - I'd be happy to share ways to get in touch.", - "id": "634" - }, - "635": { - "label": false, - "text": "Now, the article has suffered a recent revertwar over silly tags, and is protected over it. There goes my first WP:GA -( \u0395\u03bc\u03c0\u03c1\u03bf\u03c3!", - "id": "635" - }, - "636": { - "label": false, - "text": "Knock it off! \n\nSpinningSpark, quit it! You've been community-banned when you blocked me you made the sinkhole you are in now deeper and deeper. If you want to live you need to take advantage of your priviledges - BASICALLY KEEP THE HELL OFF WIKIPEDIA for a YEAR and edit on other wikimedia projects to demonstrate that, after a week or two, an appeal would be beneficial to the project!! If I create a new account that is more selective, maybe it will be eligible for adminship. If so, the first thing I will do is get you community-banned. I WANT REVENGE!!! 1YlGC6dsynvm", - "id": "636" - }, - "637": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\n\n User:23 editor seems accustomed, like here, only to issuing silly threats and conceited patriarchal condescension, which s/he uses to dismiss as reliable on the topic of extremely virulent homophobia, and indeed by a prime minister of a country (to wit: at a par with Zimbabwe, only an EU candidate country) nonetheless statements made by the Gay Straight Alliance (one of the co-organisers of the Pride Parade), seemingly with the intent of making it appear as if the GSA could possibly be unreliable on the very issue of that very Pride Parade or on the issue of the prime minister's unacceptable discourse about LGBTs and the parade. \n\n I do not understand how could possibly someone... anyone not with a brain but with a head claim that the GSA, the co-organiser of the event cancelled by the homophobe prime minister (who calls gays \"\"abnormal\"\" and his own fellow party memmber who supports LGBT people \"\"a person with a darkened mind because of exposure to pro-LGBT radiation in Brussels\"\"), are an unreliable source on this?\"", - "id": "637" - }, - "638": { - "label": false, - "text": "Oh yes. Of course I believe I'm going to lose. That's the problem. When admins put aside their administrative resposibilities for politics and vote based on what they want to see instead of what belongs on wikipedia, then I'm sure I will lose. I have no problem admitting that.", - "id": "638" - }, - "639": { - "label": false, - "text": "Hi! \nThank you so much for improving the page 2009 Istanbul Flood, I really appreciate your help! Thanks!", - "id": "639" - }, - "640": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\n\n Quebec registration plates prohibited in front? \n\nBut... why? What bad would it do to put another plate in front? I don't understand. \nThat is a question to ask the Qu\u00e9bec government for their specific reasoning on that. I know for a fact safety is one reason some jurisdictions give. Example: A front plate might look \"\"real\"\" and be confused for a real plate in other jurisdictions that have a front plate, you can take your pick - i'm just hypothesizing why. I do know that some vehicles in Qu\u00e9bec, Semis (tractor trailers) are required to have a front plate, as the trailer hides the plate on the back of a Truck (tractor), for example. Like I said, just because it's not legal, it does not mean police enforce it, and just because it hasn't been enforced by some police does not mean it will not be by others. \"", - "id": "640" - }, - "641": { - "label": false, - "text": "look at my page \n\nlord lawson of beamish\nput that in your searchbar", - "id": "641" - }, - "642": { - "label": false, - "text": "Al Fateh\nHi, I noted that you nominated Al Fateh for deletion. I have fixed that nomination by completing steps two and three of the AfD process as the discussion was not appearing on the log page. I have posted you this message for your information and for your future deletion nominations.", - "id": "642" - }, - "643": { - "label": false, - "text": "Page protection \nThank you, doing a good job. Former D&D; DM myself ;) 74.248.71.136", - "id": "643" - }, - "644": { - "label": false, - "text": "doesnt matter if i have, i dont inject it into the edits i make", - "id": "644" - }, - "645": { - "label": false, - "text": "TV Schedule pages \n\nThese pages are all right as is. Please do NOT tamper with them; if you do wyou will risk getting BLOCKED!!198.236.192.210", - "id": "645" - }, - "646": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\n\nURGENT Appeal - Beckjord dog fell off cliff\n\n\"\" Dear Friends and enemies- even in the midst of conflicts, we become related, even in opposition. Today, we took our Bigfoot watch-dog, Toby, a yellow lab, to Dillon Beach,CA, for a run and he slipped off a cliff. Fell 25 feet and broke both front legs. Now is in vet's office and facing surgery. Being broke, it will be tough to face $3000 -$4000 in vet fees. Toby is resting under sedation and we take him to the surgeon tomorrow. Anyone wishing to assist us can donate for tax deduction 501(3)(c) by contacting us at rudy@stealthaccess.net or sending check to use for Fractured Atlas (sponsor) at E,Beckjord Box 950-2,Berkeley,CA 94709 and they will send back tax deducion form. Purpose is vets bills for Video Bigfoot sniffer dog benefit, for the Ultimate Bigfoot Video Film Project. E.B.\"\"\n\nsee dog at http://www.beckjord.com/electricrepairs/yelldg.jpg\n\nfrom the Edit Committee.\"", - "id": "646" - }, - "647": { - "label": false, - "text": "Here is a little evidence . An anonymous user on the same service is ALSO an AOL web proxy server.). Strangely, I also know a TRCourage who uses aol and I can prove it too, many times over.", - "id": "647" - }, - "648": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\n\n A barnstar for you! \n\n The Original Barnstar \"", - "id": "648" - }, - "649": { - "label": false, - "text": "This is interesting cause i have several books saying the troops started to land only at evening of 22nd and that operation was completed by the early morning of 23rd. Given that the order to go ahead was given on 22nd i would be quite surprised if Finns landed there on 21st. However none of this matters. Agreement quite clearly states that if the war came to Baltic Sea then Finns were allowed to place troops to the island. And what do you know... Nazi Germany was at war and used Baltic sea making it legal under the demilitarization treaty for the Finns move troops there (technically they could have kept troops there the whole time - its not Finnish problem if SU cant understand treaty texts). Also there is no requirement for the Finland to participate into that war in order to allowed to place troops in \u00c5land. Also as it happened Soviet aircraft attacked unsuccessfully the ships headed to \u00c5land (before they got there that is) on 22nd of June. -", - "id": "649" - }, - "650": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\nMaybe the stability will improve; at the least perhaps a hold is due for the time being. I did some work regarding the WP:MoS issues, though the article could still use work, especially the lead. I also pointed out some other things that need to be fixed.\u2014(TALKCONT) \"", - "id": "650" - }, - "651": { - "label": false, - "text": "Well, he seems very bent on blocking you. 4 blocks since October.", - "id": "651" - }, - "652": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\n\n Naji al-Ali \n\nHi Ian,\n\nI noticed you changed the date of birth cited on this page to 1938. What is your source for that? I'm wondering because the Arabic wikipedia article, which this page started as a translation from, cites his year of birth as 1937, while a book I have about him - the one referenced in the article - cites it as 1936. What the book says in a footnote on the subject is \"\"Sulaiman al-Shaikh - \"\"The caricature artist Naji al-Ali\"\" - in the Kuwaiti magazine al-`Arabi, no. 297, August 1983. Naji al-`Ali saw this date and did not raise any objection.\"\" While the book is certainly not academic, it's also worth noting that amongst those thanked by the author is Khalid al-`Ali, the artist's son.\n\nOn the other hand, on this page Naji al`Ali himself is quoted as saying \"\"I was born where Christ was born: between Tiberias and Nazareth in the village of al-Shahra in the northern Galilee, and I was expelled from there ten years later in 1948 to `Ain al-Hilwe camp in Lebanon.\"\"\n\nHowever, the same site also bases its short biography of Naji al-`Ali on the book I used, and gives the year 1936 for his birth accordingly.\n\nUnless you have a solid source, I think we may have to leave it as unknown.\n\nBy the way, that site also shows a pretty cool PFLP poster about his assassination, I wonder could we get permission to use it... \n\nAll the best, | Talk \"", - "id": "652" - }, - "653": { - "label": false, - "text": "Why can't you review it at all? You and Magog can unblock CA even though you were both blocking administrators. I NEVER posted on my talk page posing as anyone else. I have never had any sort of history doing that. If you look at CATruth and his sockpuppets you'll see that isn't beyond his/her pattern of behavior. I collected evidence to make it easier for later administrators, but harassing? No. You say that I harrassed him as 198? Please link to me where. I believe that he used a Meatpuppet(had someone else in ny edit) in this situation and waited for me to try and annoy me. I requested that he stop doing this and told him that is a violation. Of course, he went to you and even stated that I have been violating wiki policy for 5 years. If you think about it, I have no history of this behavior, only he does. Also my first block EVER is for one week. 24.239.153.58", - "id": "653" - }, - "654": { - "label": false, - "text": "Oh wait...never mind. It was you.", - "id": "654" - }, - "655": { - "label": false, - "text": "Meta Knight and King Dedede both deserve articles not just because of their game apperances but also the anime. Not only that but else where in Wikipedia some one time squid monster from a Godzilla movie which does not even so much as cameo Godzilla has a long detailed article about how obscure he is. If something this irralevent deserves an article then why not King Dedede and Meta Knight who are easily far more recognizable then a rubber suited monster from however many years ago.", - "id": "655" - }, - "656": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\nThis article was nominated for deletion on November 30, 2005.\nThe result of the discussion was keep. \nAn archived record of this discussion can be found here.\"", - "id": "656" - }, - "657": { - "label": false, - "text": "Bing Bang (Time to Dance)\nWhat do you feel needs cleaned up about the article?", - "id": "657" - }, - "658": { - "label": false, - "text": "The definition is extended so that it eats also functions. A function from M to R^n would still be a function and NOT a tangent vector.", - "id": "658" - }, - "659": { - "label": false, - "text": "Kid will get his ass belted \n\nCall a kids house and hope for a om or dad the sa so and sos name and sa he needs to come over at 7 for his blow job then listen through the phone and see him the next day, (use *67 or what eva ur block numba is)", - "id": "659" - }, - "660": { - "label": false, - "text": "Didier AFD #3\nThey keep trying to find reasons to delete it. It is up for a 3rd time. If they would only channel their efforts into improving it. After all, it has been improved and even re-titiled.", - "id": "660" - }, - "661": { - "label": false, - "text": "The latter is an issue. As for the game suggestion, Aza hasn't decided to reply yet. If you can find ZUN's derivative work statement on the games, that should be more than enough to resolve this. Gimmetrow", - "id": "661" - }, - "662": { - "label": false, - "text": "Yes. I was there, too. I hate to tell you this, but Jay don't like you. He thinks you're a very bad vandal. You've been blocked permanently from editing HRWiki. \u2014", - "id": "662" - }, - "663": { - "label": false, - "text": "CMSAZ - I re-edited KPHO , both are employees of Helicopters Inc a private company providing air video service to KTVK,KPHO,KPNX. They are not branded or considered employees or on-air personalities of KPHO or the Meredith Corporation. I appreciate what you do for the industry by updated the Wiki's but as someone who works in this industry and this market please do not continue to provide mis information.", - "id": "663" - }, - "664": { - "label": false, - "text": "Factually incorrect information? How many articles from reputable sources do you want that Emilio Pucci created Capri pants?\nHere are just a few:\n\nhttp://dlxs.lib.wayne.edu/d/dhhcc/bios/pucci.html\n\nhttp://dept.kent.edu/museum/exhibit/pucci/pucci2.html\n\nhttp://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/26/style/tmagazine/26pucci.html\n\nhttp://www.ultimateitaly.com/fashion/emilio-pucci.html\n\nhttp://www.handbags-online.us/emilio-pucci.html\n\nhttp://www.fashionmodeldirectory.com/designers/Emilio+Pucci/\n\nhttp://reviews.ebay.com/Emilio-Pucci-A-Guide-to-Emilio-Pucci-amp-Fashion_W0QQugidZ10000000001022967\n\nhttp://www.poandpo.com/design-art-and-nice-stuff/puccis-coloured-swirls/\n\nThe unverifiable claims were the ones that I set out to remove from Wikipedia - the claims that a heretofore unheard-of Sonja de Lennart, who was completely unknown on Google until December 2007, created Capri pants.\n\nOriginally there was one site given as a source for the Sonja de Lennart claims - www.sonjadelennart.com, a site owned by Eleonora de Lennart and created in February 2008. A simple glance at this website will show that it is not a reputable source. Instead, it was fabricated for the sole purpose of fooling Wikipedia.\nUnfortunately, the Wikipedia hoax was not detected before answers.com and other websites picked up the false claim of authorship and it was included in an Associated Press article that was widely syndicated. The success of the hoax in tricking a reporter is now being used to give the hoax legitimacy.\n\nUsers Pchip and Delennart have had no other purpose on Wikipedia than to spread the false stories about Capri pants. Your actions in supporting their claims and in blocking the attempt to undo their persistent vandalism are damaging Wikipedia.", - "id": "664" - }, - "665": { - "label": false, - "text": "We had an edit conflict there. Unfortunately, since we don't know too, too much about the format of the Pinakes it's hard to say what was possible. But we might remember that there would most likely only be one entry for the Iliad, which could have been as many as 24 rolls per copy in the library and there were very likely many copies.", - "id": "665" - }, - "666": { - "label": false, - "text": "If only you could understand the purpose of policies, but you are too narrowminded", - "id": "666" - }, - "667": { - "label": false, - "text": "Mostly wrong about me, but understandably so \n\n See this long thread...", - "id": "667" - }, - "668": { - "label": false, - "text": "Why spend $5 on a crappy plastic hula hoop when you can spend $250 for a virtual hulahoop?! Instead of going outside with your friends to the bowling alley, why not consider a wii instead, with realistic arm waiving action! Sony and Microsoft will tell you that today's games are about graphics, story, and gaming, but we at Nintendo like to think otherwise. For isntance, have you seen our new wii fit product? Instead of doing pushups and yoga the old boring way, now you can do it on a white pad. Give Wii a try! You'll love the gamepla..... hmm..... well you'll love the Wii.", - "id": "668" - }, - "669": { - "label": false, - "text": "I doubt this will get through your thick head (it's not an insult, it's an opinion based on your response) but the problem is not the issue itself. It's that people like you seem to enjoy (whether or not your side gets it right) to discuss, turn, twist and frankly abuse topics like this which are detrimental to the basic goals of Wikis in general and Wikipedia in particular. As John Stewart said to two hacks; You're hurting us.", - "id": "669" - }, - "670": { - "label": false, - "text": "No problem, the other thing is that when I read medical pages, I start to think I have the same symptoms - I wonder of other people are like that.", - "id": "670" - }, - "671": { - "label": false, - "text": "I said vice versa besides it's has nothing to do with this article. I see... You are just an Arab hater who has an extremely jingoism spirit.", - "id": "671" - }, - "672": { - "label": false, - "text": "\" \u00b0o \n\nPlease do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia!\n\n April 28th \n\nYour recent edit to Progressivism was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept our apologies \u2013 if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. ' for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // \n\nPlease refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Progressivism. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. \n\n May 2006 \n\n \n\nYour recent edit to Military history of Japan was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept our apologies \u2013 if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. ' for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // \n\nPlease stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. \"", - "id": "672" - }, - "673": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\n\n Pembroke Pines \n\n\"", - "id": "673" - }, - "674": { - "label": false, - "text": "This page needs a discography and photo", - "id": "674" - }, - "675": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"How convenient you people would find my contribution non-constructive! Any bit of information that might reveal something other than what you have been trained to believe is a \"\"no-no\"\" apparently. How sad that is:( I guess only YOUR word is law right? Well, I intend to appeal this by any means necessary and I will protest your actions against me!\n\n\"", - "id": "675" - }, - "676": { - "label": false, - "text": "No,there isn't a reliable source that states Justin Bieber is going to be on there.", - "id": "676" - }, - "677": { - "label": false, - "text": "Please don't copy-paste articles from news sources into Wikipedia. user:zanimum", - "id": "677" - }, - "678": { - "label": false, - "text": "PATAGONIA\nI see that you are an Argentina Editor for Wikipedia, I am an editor and Historian from Chile. How can you send me this note QUOTE This is nonsensical. Are you saying that the boundaries of Patagonia are to be defined by a XIXth century map? Or maybe from the territories supposedly roamed by Tehuelches? (not now, of course, but 15k years ago, when it would be impossible to talk about tehuelches properly)??? Oh, come on. Please, bring on reliable sources and serious data to contrast. IANVS (talk) UNQUOTE How can you say this, also send me notices and messages everywhere my work on Patagonia for Wikipedia is edited, you Edit again and threten? Here we are not trying to take any part of Patagonia from Argentina, what we are trying to do is to clarify the Chilean patagonia Northern Boundaries, with Historic citations, geography and well documented arguments.Since it is all written and it is all in History books and you will not change it via the WEB or because you are from Argentina and think to be an authority in Patagonia matters. Leave our Chilean matters alone we do not discuss about your internal affairs. Also be brave, and answer in this media and all the post you have posted agains me or my articles with SOLID EVIDENCE in what you are trying to say.", - "id": "678" - }, - "679": { - "label": false, - "text": "Not a forum. \n\nDon't worry, I'm done talking with him.", - "id": "679" - }, - "680": { - "label": false, - "text": "\":::It might sound plausible, yet it doesn't explain the step of being expelled from Wikipedia. This unrelated revert triggered the expulsion yet it doesn't have anything to do with AN/I and I will prove it on your talk page. It was a hasty action to block someone just because he rightfully reverted the disruptive edits of one user who previously has partaken in multiple disputes over the same thing - genres in the infobox. I find it quite ironic that no one seemed to notice that these exaggerated responses are clearly-obviously-not-to-be-taken-seriously which some unrelated users reduced to \"\"vicious personal attacks/borderline threatening\"\". This was used as an excuse to make the final step. Also it's quite shocking that AN/I is treated like pub where everyone can influence others' opinions. \"", - "id": "680" - }, - "681": { - "label": false, - "text": "I would like to know whether WDH thinks that this table proides a reasonable basis for organizing the article, or part of it, an if not, why not (of course others are welcome to chime in, esp. Ramdrake who has been following this debate closely, but I am especially concerned to know how WDH responds to this. | Talk", - "id": "681" - }, - "682": { - "label": false, - "text": "m going to approve it, on the basis that the level for approval is a likelihood of passing afd. In this case, the likelihood is probably a little better than even. You could improve the article by using a fuller format for references: see WP:REFBEGIN, but that would include the author and title of each item, the printed source if any, and the online linkeven if the online link is behind a paywall. If it is, it will help to give some indication of the extent of coveragethe objections is likely to be that the NYT refs gave him a mere mention. There are two places where specific references are definitely neededI marked them. The claim for his role in the creation of Build America Bonds seems quite indirect; unless he specifically is given credit in a source, it might amount to Original Research, which we do not do. I'd fix these quicklyit is usual for articles on candidates who do not win elections to be nominated for an afd discussion. And be aware that we have feeling of skepticism against articles with an obvious conflict of interest. '''''' ( talk )", - "id": "682" - }, - "683": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\n it's a private web site and does not even mention the title you use. Please conduct this conversation on the talk page of the article - owning it's deletion TALK \"", - "id": "683" - }, - "684": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\n\n Notice \n\nReply\n\nThe bottom line/Recapitulation\nHi. I believe you used your administrator rights improperly since you accused me of multiple things. I consider the content of the block message very offensive and untrue since the edit war technically didn't occur (one false accusation) then calling non-abusive ad hominem reactions as \"\"offensive personal attacks\"\"/\"\"harassment\"\" (second false accusation). I realistically admit that policies of Wikipedia sometimes can be bureaucratically absurd (like for example using specific descriptive words for a young person will result in prohibition from contributing to Wikipedia, since everything even AGF responses are considered as extreme personal attacks), therefore we won't discuss the latter issue. \nMultiple references, like this one, supports my Kylie Minogue's revert and the user Nickyp88 is notified now to not revert other people's edits over personal OR claims such as \"\"Nu-disco. No. Disco, Nu-disco is different than disco\"\". But you clearly didn't want to hear my opinion and probably just let the AN/I \"\"plebs\"\" decide my \"\"destiny\"\". \nThank you for listening. \"", - "id": "684" - }, - "685": { - "label": false, - "text": "\":::\"\"[O]r if not, this will be an active record of it, and will be used as evidence, in the case this ever did go through every step of DR\"\". I'm not sure whether you're looking to escalate this, but I'm hoping to disengage. I don't think asking for space is unreasonable. \n\n\"", - "id": "685" - }, - "686": { - "label": false, - "text": "2011 (UTC)\nI've changed it over to another free-use image. We did use a crop from the same base photo once before, but the crop wasn't very good - I've recropped, and tried to clean it up a bit. - 10:02, 2 April", - "id": "686" - }, - "687": { - "label": false, - "text": "has got some sand trapped in his vagina and it's making him a little bit cranky", - "id": "687" - }, - "688": { - "label": false, - "text": "Wow, that discussion is way beyond stupid. Nothing but media hype? What the hell is that based on? The Wikipedia page on the shooting is over 20,000 words long, and the article on the trial is well over 15,000. How can that be if those internet randoms are correct in their dismissal of this as something of little encyclopedica value? And Retrolord, you don't know what you're talking about. I live in the UK and I've been getting daily updates on this controversy on the national BBC news. Thankfully I was able to find the articles without them being on the main page, but no thanks to you apparently. It is unbelievable to me that Wikipedia can be so ignorant in how it chooses what is and is not important enough to display on the front page.", - "id": "688" - }, - "689": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\n\nThank you for your clarification and reference, \"", - "id": "689" - }, - "690": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\nOkay well this book was published before his trial and him being \"\"discredited\"\". Doesn't that make it a reliable source? It's not the book he was sued for, that was \"\"Hitler's war\"\", published after the book being reviewed. Just to make it clear I'm not trying to whitewash the Nazis or anything and say they didn't commit war crimes, obviously they did. I am just trying to make sure both sides of an academic issue are presented. \"", - "id": "690" - }, - "691": { - "label": false, - "text": "If you knew how many of these things pile in my inbox and occasionally end up on the departmental joke board, you would understand my use of immediate filters.", - "id": "691" - }, - "692": { - "label": false, - "text": "Yes, this Indoor/Outdoor section has the problem as you all pointed out. Seeing objectively as a viewer, you cannot say the dome stadiums are outdoor. Main article, List of sports attendance figures doesn't divide this list into Indoor/Outdoor.(they only divide in championship event but that also has some dome stadiums into outdoor section, while some domes into indoor. That's double standard.)", - "id": "692" - }, - "693": { - "label": false, - "text": "Sanctioning from a bunch of bigots means nothing to me.", - "id": "693" - }, - "694": { - "label": false, - "text": "Congressman Dan Burton \n\nI needed some help on the Dan Burton page. According to his congressional biography and Indiana Ballot his proper name is Danny Burton. I find no evidence that his name is Daniel. He was actually born Danny Lee Burton from all sources. I am pretty new on wikipedia. Am I editing the page wrong or am I not following the proper channels? Thanks for any help", - "id": "694" - }, - "695": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\n\nWhere in the above do I once claim any \"\"ownership\"\" Algae? Suggest you not make assumptions here, thanks. Sources are one of the best ways to avoid POV, and, as a judicial astrologer, and teacher, I am versed on this subject. As I stated, this particular Wiki-subject is new, and as for \"\"obvious mistakes\"\" I would then ask you to cite them - also using sources, as this \"\"claim\"\" is POV. Sources are referenced, and verifiable. Thanks. \"", - "id": "695" - }, - "696": { - "label": false, - "text": ", after immense effort", - "id": "696" - }, - "697": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\nYeah I saw. I'm assuming stupidity here. Next upload I'll block without regret. talk \"", - "id": "697" - }, - "698": { - "label": false, - "text": "Who ever keeps adding that needs to stop.", - "id": "698" - }, - "699": { - "label": false, - "text": "It seems Beve is more interested in having the article satisfying their own POV rather than detailing facts. The comment shouldn't have been deleted as it's a important part of Hamilton's background.", - "id": "699" - }, - "700": { - "label": false, - "text": "that requires a response", - "id": "700" - }, - "701": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\nCourtesy Post\nWikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User talk:Neutralhomer/TopDeely Here. - T:C \"", - "id": "701" - }, - "702": { - "label": false, - "text": "This page was created using Rendille-Boni languages as a model. ( )", - "id": "702" - }, - "703": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\n\nI am guessing, but is \"\"Predatory towing\"\" to do with vehicles being removed as part of parking enforcement? \"", - "id": "703" - }, - "704": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\nAt first glance, since they seem to be willing to discuss the issue, I'm not sure any particular action is necessary outside of standard debate amongst those familiar with the topic. \u2013''''''\u00a0|\u00a0Talk \"", - "id": "704" - }, - "705": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\n\n \nI don't know what you mean by \"\"bias\"\", but the Criticism secton was added in Sept by IP 202.126.98.210, and until recently when I added a few more real facts, you guys did not care about I don't know what \"\"policy\"\" being broken.\n\n 04:11, 9 September 2010 202.126.98.210 (talk) (3,485 bytes) (Added a criticism section, describing Softpedias disguised ads approach to serving content.) (undo)\"", - "id": "705" - }, - "706": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\n\nOoh.. you gotta upload a sound clip of you playing it! ) \u2122 \"", - "id": "706" - }, - "707": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\n\n Modern Martial Arts Schools \n\nAnshu Krista Jacobson is not in the US Hall of Fame, not under her current name or her birth name, Christopher Brooks. Her \"\"proof\"\" to Sokeship has also been invalidated along with her Martial Arts Titles and Training.\n\nhttp://www.unitedstatesmartialartshalloffame.com/index.html\"", - "id": "707" - }, - "708": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\nSo his summaries weren't \"\"AS\"\" antagonistic. So whichever person is a bit more antagonistic gets the warning. Good to know. On to your second claim: I still don't understand how *I* have a \"\"pattern of edit warring,\"\" but Olyeller doesn't when: (1) I added a completely valid and relevant and referenced sentence; and (2) OlYeller repeatedly removed it for NO VALID REASON; and (3) Olyeller falsely claimed in his summary that the issue was presented in the talk page. So it's odd that falsifying summaries isn't considered a form of antagonism and/or worthy of a warning. The only reason OlYeller removed it is because he has a really big anti-Carbonator grudge. I once called him a \"\"thin-skinned prick\"\" and he took it badly. He now confirms the validity of said appellation by obsessively searching for ANY of my edits and reverting them, which is exactly what he did in this case. How is that not vandalism? \"", - "id": "708" - }, - "709": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\n\n Opening \n\n\"\"Unlike earlier concepts and definitions of war\u2014with defined nations, boundaries, standing armies, and navies\u2014the \"\"War on Terrorism\"\" has largely been dominated by the use of special forces, intelligence, police work, diplomacy, and propaganda.\"\" I wasn't aware that propaganda was a part of the war on terror. Evidence? Support? \"", - "id": "709" - }, - "710": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\nI have noticed that it seems to be a British tendency to use \"\"which\"\" instead of \"\"that\"\", but I've seen and heard Americans use them interchangeably too. In informal English (especially spoken), many use either which in lieu of that regardless of circumstance, and it is considered acceptable to do so in most instances. In more formal encyclopedic prose though, I think the grammatical precision is necessary. I hope someone who has more knowledge in this area can help me out here. \"", - "id": "710" - }, - "711": { - "label": false, - "text": "Thanks for experimenting with the page Bonzi Buddy on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks.", - "id": "711" - }, - "712": { - "label": false, - "text": "I don't think there are any male or female Yoshi(s)... the species seems to reproduce asexually. Besides, it's friggin' Mario, the canon is deliberately very loose and rarely gets in the way of gameplay. Besides, I think that the Yoshi's egglaying ability is an innovating evolutionary feature, combining with good throwing strength to create an excellent hunting/self-defence mechanism...", - "id": "712" - }, - "713": { - "label": false, - "text": "I agree that this material either needs to be put in a section far down the page or in its own article. It would make a good article and I'd support such work. In its current position, it's disruptive. Unless the new editor (who I applaud for their effort and enthusiasm) can find consensus for this configuation, the insertion needs to be removed. I have empathy for a new editor who'd like to make meaningful contributions. But it's difficult to acquire one's experience at the top of a very high profile article.", - "id": "713" - }, - "714": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\nI concur that this page should never have been moved to \"\"Carlos Hugo of Bourbon-Parma\"\". There was certainly no consensus for this move. 99.231.209.121 \"", - "id": "714" - }, - "715": { - "label": false, - "text": "Tenderloin Article\nThanks for the compliment. As far as posting wikipedia policy, I meant it for past, current, and future editors to that page. Looking at that talk page and history of the article, its mind-blowing that people were able to get away with such policy violations. I will continue to keep an eye for such violations.", - "id": "715" - }, - "716": { - "label": false, - "text": "I was undiplomatic certainly. But afterall, this is a known hoaxer we're dealing with. Or is calling out a known hoaxer considered a personal attack? I agree that some of the other things I said were undiplomatic, but is calling out a hoaxer considered a personal attack too? Anyway, I don't disagree with your rigid enforcement of Wikipedia policy. I do wish you had let me know about it beforehand as the hoaxer is now butchering some of my posts and I can't call attention to that, but I've wasted enough time with this anyway so you've really done me a favor. As for cooling off, I wrote everything I did in a calm repose and with a measure of amused exasperation. I do hope you blocked the hoaxer as well.", - "id": "716" - }, - "717": { - "label": false, - "text": "(re: J. Leon Altemose)", - "id": "717" - }, - "718": { - "label": false, - "text": "Allow me \n\n , award this Epic Barnstar for your great success in redesigning Joseph Stalin articles and its subpages. Thanks a lot, it is much better now ]]", - "id": "718" - }, - "719": { - "label": false, - "text": "I'm GeorgianJorjadze. \n\nHello FisherQueen. I am GeorgianJorjadze. I just posted a message on Elockid's talk page and I am interested in your opinion. GJ", - "id": "719" - }, - "720": { - "label": false, - "text": "24.189.168.173 \n\nThe return of myself, evading one year block.\n\nWikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/24.189.168.173/Archive\n\nCategory:Wikipedia sockpuppets of NewSubwayLove\n\nI don't know how to contact users while blocked, so I decided to evade block and continue to edit the New York City Subway pages as well as Mafia: The City of Lost Heaven and Mafia II (Mafia video game series).", - "id": "720" - }, - "721": { - "label": false, - "text": "Liquitex is owned by Col Art, who also own Winsor & Newton but where is the evidence that Winsor & Newton make Liquitex Acrylic paints? W & N are a UK company - Liquitex was founded in the USA.", - "id": "721" - }, - "722": { - "label": false, - "text": "26-9 or 21-9? \n\nUFC lists him as 26-9, Wikipedia as 21-9!?", - "id": "722" - }, - "723": { - "label": false, - "text": "Who is this Saduj al-Dahij?", - "id": "723" - }, - "724": { - "label": false, - "text": "This would clutter the table a little bit, but would be the most powerful option.", - "id": "724" - }, - "725": { - "label": false, - "text": "Asian Supremacy\nYou voted to delete the article Asian supremacy because you felt it was unverifiable. It is verifiable. The organization Goldsea supports Asian supremacy.", - "id": "725" - }, - "726": { - "label": false, - "text": "do not know how report for editor who keep reverting page to include original research works", - "id": "726" - }, - "727": { - "label": false, - "text": "Ta \n\nHello, just commented to say thanks for answering my question on the help desk - I was being a bit clumsy and I'd appreciate if I would be allowed permission to keep the same information as an imitation as an article. I'd like my userpage to have an effect, y'know. (see my page)\n\nOh, and I too love Suicidal Tendencies and Led Zeppelin. I'm also interested in your Hedgehog article aswell; your a good writer.\n\nWrite back. Thanks mate.", - "id": "727" - }, - "728": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\n) TalkContributions \"", - "id": "728" - }, - "729": { - "label": false, - "text": "Luckily, Norden1990 is not banned, but only blocked. (talk)", - "id": "729" - }, - "730": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\nalleged copyright violations should be taken to the copyright violations page where Wiki editors can evaluate the allegation. As for \"\"nonsense,\"\" that's a new allegation! Which text is \"\"nonsense\"\"?? \"", - "id": "730" - }, - "731": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\nI readded ACY into the article under the focus cities section 23 \"", - "id": "731" - }, - "732": { - "label": false, - "text": "October 2005 (UTC)\n\nI may be pulling ahead in the overall edit count race, but you seem to have a clear lead in the \n25 points, User:Willmcw, 103 days admin, 9 times reverted\n44 points, User:SlimVirgin, 200 days admin, 31 times reverted\nThanks for taking the heat. - 10:25, 11", - "id": "732" - }, - "733": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\nIf you didn't want to go into an edit war, you shouldn't have deleted it singlehandedly. Where is the \"\"majority\"\" you're talking about here? You were still having significant debate about it when you blanked the section. I don't see where you've built consensus. \"", - "id": "733" - }, - "734": { - "label": false, - "text": "Before you lord it over everyone \n\nBefore you lord it over everyone and use you godlike powers to reject anything that you disagree with maybe you should read the decision I added to explain why I changed that section. You are one of the reasons people hate Wikipedia. it has become a bastion of God-hating atheists who vomit their Presuppositions and ban or delete anyone that tries to add balance. Wikipedia is now a joke and it is because of narcissists such as yourself. I'm switching the changes back so ban away pseudo-god.69.14.96.9", - "id": "734" - }, - "735": { - "label": false, - "text": "Cyber-stalking, threats, and harassment of User:Prof02 seem to continue, without any willingness from User:Charles Matthews and User:Bishonen to engage in a rational, cool, objective debate on issues.", - "id": "735" - }, - "736": { - "label": false, - "text": "TM \n\nHow astute, remember civility is the key. That verbal licking you gave me really failed to break the skin. MAYBE JUST MAYBE WE CAN GET ALONG? HOW ABOUT THAT?", - "id": "736" - }, - "737": { - "label": false, - "text": "I'm not sure why you think the part you quoted is relevant. In the case of Politico, I don't think anyone is interested in Smith's opinion.", - "id": "737" - }, - "738": { - "label": false, - "text": "we can tell that you have a great uprising FP@S", - "id": "738" - }, - "739": { - "label": false, - "text": "OH NO. MY SOCKS PROXY WILL GET BLOCKED. ( ( (\n\nA note to all Wikipedia administrators: YOU ALL EAT SHIT FOR BREAKFAST.", - "id": "739" - }, - "740": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\n\n Rollback Permission \n\nThank you for granting me with rollback permissions. All the Best. \"", - "id": "740" - }, - "741": { - "label": false, - "text": "(UTC)\n \nI have friends at What Now who have confirmed that what now did premiere in 1981 with steve parr there are photos and footage at the TVNZ studios for proof\n 01:53, 13 February 2010", - "id": "741" - }, - "742": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\n\nIf it makes you feel better, we can reword the article to read \"\"Lehi justified acts of terror against their enemies\"\" or somesuch, without specifically using the word \"\"terrorism\"\" in this context. (Btw, I'm puzzled as to how a defunct organization can still justify acts of terror.) \"", - "id": "742" - }, - "743": { - "label": false, - "text": "Protection? \n\nThis page needs to be semi-protected. All the annoymous people are constantly adding spam links. Pretty much the last 50 or so edits are just reverting spam links.", - "id": "743" - }, - "744": { - "label": false, - "text": "REDIRECT Talk:Militia organizations in the United States", - "id": "744" - }, - "745": { - "label": false, - "text": "The Graphic Novel (set in 1997) mentions Queen Zara celebrating her 16th birthday (thus Zara Philips).", - "id": "745" - }, - "746": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\n\nAnd so because the French deby they lost a warplane, automatically makes it true. But if Libya denied losing the tanks the French claim to have destroyed, that would be \"\"unreliable\"\" wouldn't it, Terrillja? Biased, biased, biased.\"", - "id": "746" - }, - "747": { - "label": false, - "text": "instruments\nit should be mentioned that he can play keyboards and guitar as well.", - "id": "747" - }, - "748": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\n\nThanks\nThanks for your message on my talk page re: RfA reform and needing more admins. I think that, perhaps, one of difficulties with backlogs on WP:AIV is time of day. For example, I have almost never seen a backlog during EST evenings. Maybe we should have time zone of residence a factor in RfAs? ;-) TC \"", - "id": "748" - }, - "749": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\n\n24,963,799 is not an approximate number. It's as precise as it can possibly be. We should either leave out the word approximate, or say approximately \"\"25 million\"\". \"", - "id": "749" - }, - "750": { - "label": false, - "text": "Support per sources, commonname & alphabetical order.", - "id": "750" - }, - "751": { - "label": false, - "text": "Good luck joining forces with Tom Butler. I'll thank you to stay off the Eric Lerner article page from now on. Thanks a lot!", - "id": "751" - }, - "752": { - "label": false, - "text": "Going to get it \n\nYou're going to get it 86.177.136.20", - "id": "752" - }, - "753": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\n\nQuestion\nAre you this arrogant in real life or are you just loike this online where you can be \"\"safe\"\"?\"", - "id": "753" - }, - "754": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"Page Updates and Controversy Section==\n\nDuring our regular monitoring of social media and our internet reputation, members of the Marketing department at Raymond James noticed that much of the information on this page is outdated and/or incomplete. We would like to take a more proactive approach to updating this information with current numbers, etc. We are not sure who was responsible for originally writing the page, and we would like to make edits so that it reads less like a promotional piece/advertisement.\n\nWe would also like to put the following \"\"Controvery\"\" section up for discussion. This section was recently posted on the page, and reads unobjectively. Many of the claims are not reliablity sourced, and the extensiveness of the section was disproportionate relative to both the size of our page and similar sections on competitors' pages. We have left three of our majo/significant events on the page, and are including the smaller/unsourced claims here for discussion. We are open to discussing how best to frame this section so that it reads more objectively.\n\nControversy\n\nRaymond James has had been one of the most controversial firms with 49 regulatory events and 61 finalized arbitration's including housing several ponzi schemes according to Finra.http://brokercheck.finra.org/Support/ReportViewer.aspx In spite of all the controversy that surrounds Raymond James, the firm has been vocal about trying to prevent any increase in regulation of the financial services industry.http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSN0813601120101108 \nSome of the most notable controversies have included:\n\nIn 1997, Charles LeCroy, a Raymond James banker, helped issue bonds in Jefferson County through a noncompetitive process. These bonds ended up funding corrupt activities and led to the county's bankruptcy.http://46in08.blogspot.com/2009/08/death-of-jefferson-county-alabama-and.html\n\nIn 2000, NASD regulators censured Raymond James & Associates, Inc. for \u201cyield burning\u201d activities on municipal securities. yield burning involves overcharges by brokerage firms on Treasury securities purchased with proceeds from the sale of municipal bonds. Yield burning by brokerage firms jeopardized the tax-exempt status of interest paid to holders of those bonds.The multi-million dollar settlement resolved the civil fraud charges under the False Claims Act against Raymond James. The payments made by Raymond James will also resolve certain tax-related claims of the Internal Revenue Service.http://www.sec.gov/news/press/2000-45.txt\n\nIn 2000, Raymond James was paid $650,000 to undertake the merger of HomeGold with smaller firms. The minimal amount of due diligence conducted by the firm prevented them from discovering the fraud that was going on. The parent firm later went bankrupt causing millions in losses and one of the biggest fraud cases in the state of South Carolina.http://www.usatoday.com/money/2004-02-05-homegold_x.htm\n\nIn 2003, Raymond James was found guilty of overcharging investors who made large purchases of mutual funds. There were nearly 160,000 trades that were overcharged and Raymond James had no systems in place to capture these trades.,http://www.txcm.com/reports/Raymond%20James%20mutual%20trading%20scandal.pdfhttp://registeredrep.com/institutions/raymondjames/finance_raymond_james_audits/\n\nIn 2005, the NASD fined Raymond James $750,000 for violations stemming from a failure to supervise the firm\u2019s fee-based brokerage accounts.\n\nIn 2007, three ex-Raymond James employees sued, saying they were paid less than men and denied opportunities.http://www.sptimes.com/2007/10/21/Business/Women_claim_sex_bias_.shtml\n\nIn 2008, Jerry Rose was found to be conducting a ponzi scheme using Raymond James as custodian to the assets which amounted to over $16 million.http://cincinnati.bizjournals.com/cincinnati/stories/2008/06/16/story13.html\n\nIn 2008, Raymond James received lots of criticism for using obscure provisions under SOX in which they denied whistle-blowing claims on the basis that the claims were made against a subsidiary company.http://whistlersear.wordpress.com/tag/sox-whistleblower/ These laws were reversed when the new Frank Dowd act was put into place on July 21, 2010. Raymond James was mentioned as one of the companies that abused the laws, as a means to conduct ethical and legal grounds. This included the case of John Hughart v. Raymond James in which the complaints regarding lax supervision in compliance was overlooked on the grounds that the employee worked a a subsidiary and therefore had no opportunity for restitution from Raymond James.http://www.oalj.dol.gov/Decisions/ALJ/SOX/2004/HUGHART_JOHN_v_RAYMOND_JAMES_and_AS_200", - "id": "754" - }, - "755": { - "label": false, - "text": "You - Again! \n\nYou are right buggy, I purposely made my last contact gibberish. Like you, I didn't refresh my memory, and realized after posting, and verifying your past content, that you use yiddish. So fly a kike, you moron!!! Also, that humor of your's at the bottom of your page - characterizing yourself as genius to the fourth power, is haha funny. Again, if you are such a genius, try editing or writing for Citizendium - you'll never make, unless they need an expert on stirring up trouble, and putting their two cents of know nothing opinions in where they are not wanted! Run along to your AN/I's now and see who else you can impress with your stupidity. 64.134.6.107", - "id": "755" - }, - "756": { - "label": false, - "text": ", 25 February 2007 (UTC)\nWe can now. ) 15:02", - "id": "756" - }, - "757": { - "label": false, - "text": "Typical, lets concentrate on I'm the problem. Not that Wiki, and monitors got it wrong. Note the different spellings of the village.", - "id": "757" - }, - "758": { - "label": false, - "text": "If it were, you're too homo to do anything about it. A wise man long ago told me that it's so easy to be brave online. But in real person, it's a whole other ball game. It must suck being a coward.", - "id": "758" - }, - "759": { - "label": false, - "text": "It wasn't Mkil, just someone sick of all your $h1T. And just for future reference learn how to write before you make edits to an encyclopedia, you make yourself look like a fool, because your illiterate. And SIGN your posts. You've been making harrassing edits for years and you even failed at that. Such a simple thing as signing your posts and you still can't get it right. I'll bet you were dropped on your head as a child weren't you? No need to answer that your writing style gives it away.138.162.128.53", - "id": "759" - }, - "760": { - "label": false, - "text": "What do you mean 'personalattacks' and why rewmoce from Talk? You've never been averse to same.", - "id": "760" - }, - "761": { - "label": false, - "text": "Toyota \n\nA neutral point of view? I have credible sources, including an article from the Washington Post.Do you honestly believe the Burma Campaign Uk listed Toyota on their shame list for fun? Let me get this straight: Anything postive about Toyota is neutral, however facts that are not so flattering about Toyota's operations in Burma, or the amount of subsidies it recieves from American taxpayers make it a non-neutral point of view. Is that how neutrality works?", - "id": "761" - }, - "762": { - "label": false, - "text": "Ah, one more thing: is there any reason to doubt this site? http://www.athletix.org/Statistics/wr100men.htm", - "id": "762" - }, - "763": { - "label": false, - "text": "LOTHAR VON TROTHA\nGOOD RIDDANCE TO HIM, HE KILLED SO MANY INNOCENT HERERO. HE DIED FROM TYPHOID FEVER IN PAIN, CAUGHT IT FROM POISONED FOOD, DRINK!!!\n mywikibiz.com/Lothar_von_Trotha", - "id": "763" - }, - "764": { - "label": false, - "text": "unsigned comment by User:Tarkaan", - "id": "764" - }, - "765": { - "label": false, - "text": "Notice \n\nHello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. 71.251.46.57", - "id": "765" - }, - "766": { - "label": false, - "text": "What? \u2014 03:04, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC)", - "id": "766" - }, - "767": { - "label": false, - "text": "December 2015 (UTC)\n|decline=After almost 3 weeks since this request was made, not a single administrator is prepared to unblock you, which is a sign of a de-facto ban. We're not interested in fine arguments about whether this account and the other one are sockpuppets or meatpuppets of each other, both are punishable offences. Because you just can't communicate a reason to get unblocked in a non-tl;dr way after several attempts, I'm revoking your talk page again. Have do doubts here: after exhausting the community's patience which lead to your original block, you've also exhausted our patience with your unblock requests. You really don't have to mount a defence in screens full of wikilawyering, you're just digging deeper the pit you're in right now. 22:37, 20", - "id": "767" - }, - "768": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\n suggested that we may want a hatnote because it summarized quite well the purpose of the article. I find nothing in WP:HATNOTE to indicate that this is a valid usage of hatnotes. I find it hard to believe that someone looking at this article was actually looking for a list of random scientists, which appears to be the stated purpose of hatnotes in this context. Does anyone have another reason why there should be a hatnote or disagree with my assessment? \"", - "id": "768" - }, - "769": { - "label": false, - "text": "Yes, thank you very much! You're my favorite sysop. The way you ignore the questions you can't answer is very commendable. Also, when you did answer the one question, you did not use facts but again, your gut feeling! I bow to your infinite wisdom, o mighty one.", - "id": "769" - }, - "770": { - "label": false, - "text": "Example: Say there are 10 equally good horses in a race. The odds would be decimal 10 or 9:1 to be fair. But typically the odds available will be decimal 8 or 7:1 at best. Backing 9 of the horses with a stake of GBP10 each in order to lay the remaining horse results in a loss of GBP20 no matter which horse wins. 05:10, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)", - "id": "770" - }, - "771": { - "label": false, - "text": "shared IP, see notice at top of page\nI cant create the subpage but i will move all the old stuff there\ni've removed all the odl stuff not from this month and will place it int he archive as soona s unblocked", - "id": "771" - }, - "772": { - "label": false, - "text": "I am keeping all this as evidence. You better believe that I can come and get you. You won't be safe. I am a believer that everyone can edit on Wikipedia. 58.110.130.60", - "id": "772" - }, - "773": { - "label": false, - "text": "Strange about the way he died \n\nI don't know anything about this man, but I noticed his name while browsing Category:Pancreatic cancer deaths. He's listed under R instead of C. Which doesn't seem to matter that much because after a short skim of the article it looks like he died of prostate cancer? 10:29, 29 July 2007 (GMT - 8) (sorry if this doesn't mimic the 4 ~ enough, I'm not logged in)", - "id": "773" - }, - "774": { - "label": false, - "text": "Man u \nhttp://www.uefa.com/uefachampionsleague/season=2016/clubs/club=52682/squad/index.html there's your source", - "id": "774" - }, - "775": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\n\nSomething as necessary to a scientific theory as falsifiability (i.e. it is not a theory unless it is falsifiable), absolutely needs a peer-reviewed journal article. There are articles that cite other methods of falsifiability, these are not the methods those article cite, so what am I missing? \nAllow fair discussion and I won't \"\"vandalize\"\". In fact as long as you stop deleting portions of our discussion, I won't touch the article at all. If it is consensus that the article can be improved as suggested, then someone else can fix the article, but I won't touch it. This is a discussion page, so allow fair discussion. If it is a consensus on Wiki that my concerns are invalid, then I will accept that consensus. In fact if there is a arbitrator for discussion employed by Wiki, I will accept their verdict, but I will not accept arbitrary deletion based off of an invalid reading of the rules. That is not in keeping with the spirit of Wiki.\"", - "id": "775" - }, - "776": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\nYou're welcome it was a very tight and coherent article to read. Easy to assess. I very rarely pass articles without holding them first so you should feel extra good about yourself. Congrats. \"", - "id": "776" - }, - "777": { - "label": false, - "text": "Kind Sir , have you ever tried to suck your own wiener? \n\nI mean you should mate and also try to catch a blowfish and f*ck its brains out\n you curry munching f*ck.And jimmy Wales called....he didnt flush today so u could go eat his shit!", - "id": "777" - }, - "778": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\n\n Happy New Year \n\nHappy New Year! I'd have an image but it would probably be the one on your userpage. Do you mind if I totally steal lovingly rip off your navigation bar?? I really like it...teh tennisman\"", - "id": "778" - }, - "779": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"You must provide references to all the worlds collected resource and reference books!!! \nyou must correlate your articles with all the worlds encyclopedias and dictionaries !!! \nyou must at least provide the synopsis from each and every parallel and credible resource. \nto assist in the selling of those works which have long stood to enlighten our world !!! \nyou must not continue on with your lollygagging mam-be-pambe malarkey bulldung freebie rally killing oddness. \nI hope you all realize the real and true threat you pose to our world educational process. \npoised to extinguish all for profit and long standing publication after the next1 \nmy education is based partly on van nostrand's scientific encyclopedias the encyclopedia astronomy and any and all other reference books which I purchased and owned!.\nSO I DEMAND YOU CITE REAL AND TRUE SOURCES SO PEOPLE MIGHT BUY THOSE BOOKS.(cd's/dvd's) \nwhich are more than you hippie yuppie pseudo know it all \"\"nomanac of idiom\"\". \nok man??!!???\nJesus H Christ !!.\n\"\"\"\"\"\"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesus_H._Christ\"\"\"\"\"\"\"\" \n\"", - "id": "779" - }, - "780": { - "label": false, - "text": "It does and it makes utterly no sense and keeps referring to statute law which is pointless in an article about COMMON LAW assault... the whole article needs deleting and starting from scratch94.168.204.89", - "id": "780" - }, - "781": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\n\nWelcome!\n\nHello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted (if it hasn't already). \n\nThere's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:\nYour first article\nBiographies of living persons\nHow to write a great article\nThe five pillars of Wikipedia\nHelp pages\nTutorial\nI hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on . Again, welcome!\u00a0 \nSpeedy deletion of \"\"Nora Istrefi\"\"\n A page you created, Nora Istrefi, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how they are important or significant, and thus why they should be included in an encyclopedia. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and the guidelines for biographies in particular.\n\nYou are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.\n\nThank you. \"", - "id": "781" - }, - "782": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\n\nRpo.castro ... you're just another Kante4's alias ... there's no other vandalism besides yours, khm \"\"Kante4\"\", nazi attitude ... You always try to divert any contribution that you dislike (Why?) to vandalism when you're wrong. Just last time you talked about \"\"\"\"DIFFERENT TOURNAMET SCHEME\"\"\"\". It's not like every tournament, that's held every two years or so, changes their competition structure. I'm wondering how didn't you say they abolished that funny named \"\"presidents cup\"\" which is nothing else fancy name for group losers placement playoffs. And when you lack any reason then you push your nazi button and call others vandals. Stop using other accounts to add nothing constructive in article where you obviously didnt contribute ... just removing some clearing tables. As even i wont remember in the middle of the night why and where these nationakl teams were placed trhat way against each other. few words notification like \"\"1-4 placement\"\" \"\"play against each other\"\" you so sold as explanation actually lacks any evidence explanation for someone just try to casually read article after few months.\"", - "id": "782" - }, - "783": { - "label": false, - "text": "Am I funny? \n\nAm I funny? 99.146.98.120", - "id": "783" - }, - "784": { - "label": false, - "text": "Sani people \n\n asked:\n\n>Do you mean Hani? I don't think there's a Sani minority.\n\nThere certainly is. The Sani live in the Lunan area near Shilin (Stone Forest). When IOC president Jacques Rogge visited Shilin last year, he was photographed with the Sani wearing their local clothing. Apparently they are a branch of the Yi. The source listed (Mozzarella of the East: Cheese-making and Bai culture) has some information about them.", - "id": "784" - }, - "785": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\n\n Final Destination 5 move \n\nSteve there is now a Final Designation 5 page, but someone named it Final Destination 5 (film) because the redirect page is protected. Can you move Final Destination 5 (film) to Final Destination 5? Thanks. \u00a0Allen \"", - "id": "785" - }, - "786": { - "label": false, - "text": "Note \n\nI stopped using this username and can be reached as Digisus, here:.", - "id": "786" - }, - "787": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\nHe has also continued to discuss the topic area on user talk pages during his ban. Request for clarification did not tell him not to but he is surely not allowed. \n\nAn admin should also notify him that \"\"indefinite topic bans\"\" typically cover user talk pages. UNtil that is done he is going to keep getting himself in trouble while breaking the stricter standards of decorum in the topic area.(which I have also failed to follow at times) \"", - "id": "787" - }, - "788": { - "label": false, - "text": "Thanks Alan \nthanks for the intro to wiki, you dumb guido, but I think I can figure it out for myself, hotshot. get a real job.", - "id": "788" - }, - "789": { - "label": false, - "text": "Powerful?! \n\nJanuary 3 added: powerful (should read: less powerful) at the beginning. I have a feeling that this is unnecessary at this point, since the whole text is about industrialization (not about power). So proposal: delete. Can anyone agree (and perform the edit)?", - "id": "789" - }, - "790": { - "label": false, - "text": "Oh really? Mr. Abuse of policy toward new editors?", - "id": "790" - }, - "791": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\n\n British Nationalism! \n\nI see from your bio page that you describe yourself as \"\"British\"\". I think that just about sums it up for me,thanks very much! Slainte Mhath! Saor Alba! Iain Mac Ghille Mhaoil\"", - "id": "791" - }, - "792": { - "label": false, - "text": "Biased, unreliable,emotionally written by armenin wiki editors==\nPls, stop using the wikipedia for your dirty propaganda and lobbying purposes. There was no genocide. THis is a amyth advanced by the armenian church and armenian fundamentalist fascists. A nation can not be subject to a egnocide when it has several heros for whom you can see statues in yerevan (Irevan),. jews don't have it. The resolution is the act of some sold congressmen who want to appease the armenian lobby. it has no reliable, valid and neutral content. It is kjust a piece of dirty and lie facts presented and written by christian missionaries working to kill Turks and Kurds in 1910s. You can claim to be subject to genocide as much as you want. But this thing did never happen. Some armenian fundamentalists and fascists, who were killing Kurds, Turks and Azerbaijanis, were killed by great sons of the Turkic nation and I am proud of them. Go and propogate your lie as much as you can. YOu will achieve nothing. raman\n\n==", - "id": "792" - }, - "793": { - "label": false, - "text": "Your Edit to World Wrestling Entertainment", - "id": "793" - }, - "794": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\n\n Reliable Source \n\nI'm a high school teacher. My students always ask me if they can use Wikipedia. They seem stunned when I say they can, and they often reply with an astonished \"\"But is not reliable - anyone can edit it!\"\" I simply laugh them off and and share the countless studies that have shown Wikipedia to be in the high 90% reliable range.\n\nI am curious though...what would you have teachers like myself say to students conducting research on Wikipedia concerning its reliability? \"", - "id": "794" - }, - "795": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\n Besides nowhere in CSD#F9 it says: \"\"The seven-day waiting period for untagged images is only for cases where there is at least a realistic chance that the tagging might bring with it a satisfactory source/license declaration\"\". \"", - "id": "795" - }, - "796": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\nThree issues regarding the title: 1. The first reference in the article refers to the \"\"Central Luxury House\"\", but where did that quote come from? The Telegraph article does not tell us. 2. Would we call the US \"\"White House\"\" or ROK's \"\"Blue House\"\" a Luxury House or Luxury Residence? No, but we certainly could in terms of what wonderful amenities they have. In nK the contrast between what the Great Leader has vs. what others has is striking. But when we point out this contrast by means of an article we are not neutral. 3. The article name must be recognizable. This does not mean we name the article so that it will become recognizable. \"", - "id": "796" - }, - "797": { - "label": false, - "text": ", 17 April 2015 (UTC)\n\nYes.. usually you define the terms between the equations. wow. 13:07", - "id": "797" - }, - "798": { - "label": false, - "text": "Improvements to yourself \n\n - see image page for explanation.", - "id": "798" - }, - "799": { - "label": false, - "text": "Well user Burgass has done it again. Just look at this user's constant and strange behaviour in this article.", - "id": "799" - }, - "800": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\n\n Uniforms and the various stages \n\nThroughout the game there are only 3 camo's Urban Desert and Arctic i find the desert useless because it is bright and stands out even in the sandy levels \"\"Junk Flea\"\" and \"\"Pump Jack\"\" the addition of Sand Hog will hopefuly fix thsi problemb the reguler green forest camo was made effective by the Brushwood level but the Desert camo must be made useful in some way or it risks staying obselete.74.84.9.226 formerly Smashingwilddogs\"", - "id": "800" - }, - "801": { - "label": false, - "text": "TropicalKitty \n\nTropicalKitty is the gobbler of knobs.", - "id": "801" - }, - "802": { - "label": false, - "text": "Aftereight Article Deletion \n\nHello, I noticed you started the process of moving/deleting the Aftereight article because they changed their name to Capital Lights. What you failed to realize though, is that all the Aftereight material had not been fully integrated into the Capital Lights article and is now lost/gone. I cannot effectively move information now (band members, albums, etc).", - "id": "802" - }, - "803": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\n\nIt appears that you're requesting the unblock of an ip that is part of a range being used mainly for disruption. Can you ease our worries by giving us an idea of what kinds of edits you're planning to make? - (talk \u00b7 contribs) \"", - "id": "803" - }, - "804": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"== You around? ==\n\nThe article has been moved . Are you still interested in it? '''Talk'''\u00b7'''Contribs''' \"", - "id": "804" - }, - "805": { - "label": false, - "text": "By the way, you're an ass!", - "id": "805" - }, - "806": { - "label": false, - "text": "Please educate me as to how this article is a copyright infringement and, if so, from which source. Once this has been established could you explain how best to rectify the situation. Thank you", - "id": "806" - }, - "807": { - "label": false, - "text": "I'd love a picture, but that one is copyrighted. -", - "id": "807" - }, - "808": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\nBut it is most important that the editors report what a source actually says and not twist it to their POV by quoting or paraphrasing it out of context. The \"\"editor's note\"\" provides the context for the reader, it does not try to tell the reader what to think. Talk.Origins twisted what the authors meant to serve it's agenda by keeping the context from the readers. And when WP uses Talk.Origins it promulgates the lies.\n\nThe purpose of an encyclopedia is to report what people or groups say and believe without commentary on whether it is good, bad or indifferent. ALL of the articles in WP about and related to Creationism are editorialized up the wazoo. In other words, on this topic, WP has ceased to be an encyclopedia, and has become a propaganda machine. \"", - "id": "808" - }, - "809": { - "label": false, - "text": "Controversy section \n\nI've tagged the controversy section with {{verify}} and {{unreferenced}}. If citations aren't provided for this material, it can be deleted at any time as per WP:BLP. (talk)", - "id": "809" - }, - "810": { - "label": false, - "text": "Eubulides claims that there are many POV in chiropractic according to his list however everything he wants deleted is always a source that supports the efficacy of chiropractic care, in some way shape or form. Furthermore, as a medical doctor, Eubulides' edits and his intention behind them are deplorable and his claims of POV are either grossly exaggerated or without merit.", - "id": "810" - }, - "811": { - "label": false, - "text": "Your hypocrisy amuses me. \n\nLook at your userpage. It has webhost written all over it. If i had to lose mine, which i might add, was of religious value to me, then you must certainly have to remove yours. Take a look at User Guinnog for example. This also has webhost written all over it. I put it to you, you elitist, authoritarian administrator, that your userpage is not in line with the goals of wikipedia.\n\nWhat do i have to do to become an admin? I'm told I'd be a great addition to 'the team'. \n\nMany Spanks...sorry...thanks, (Percy Nobby Norton got to the keyboard again)..", - "id": "811" - }, - "812": { - "label": false, - "text": "Yeah, because America is so much more civilised than Western Europe. No... wait...", - "id": "812" - }, - "813": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\nAnd you really do flatter yourself by calling yourself \"\"the other parent\"\". I dislike being patronised even more than I dislike threats. Btw, wouldn't you reckon that running to an Admin to get me \"\"banned\"\" was a bit 'running to Mommy-ish\"\"? \"", - "id": "813" - }, - "814": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\n\nSurvivors vs survivors series\n\nHave no problems calling the series \"\"survivors\"\" - are you going to move/change them all (P-47, P-40, Me-109, B-52, F4U etc) or do you want me to do it?? \"", - "id": "814" - }, - "815": { - "label": false, - "text": "Fixed author, date, PD for D\u00fcrer image.", - "id": "815" - }, - "816": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\n\n Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Kenna. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. \"", - "id": "816" - }, - "817": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\n It is unfair that I get blocked but others do not for also not assuming good faith. (talk) \"", - "id": "817" - }, - "818": { - "label": false, - "text": "System Of A Down - Alternative, folk.. I don't know?", - "id": "818" - }, - "819": { - "label": false, - "text": "Bluerain. March 23, 2006.", - "id": "819" - }, - "820": { - "label": false, - "text": "In California you can pre-pay with Correctional Billing Services giving permission for the inmate to call you, he will need no money, just a phone.", - "id": "820" - }, - "821": { - "label": false, - "text": "AWB and categorization \n\nHi, and thanks for expressing an interest in my recent post about getting some AWBers to help out with the categorization project. I've written up a page,", - "id": "821" - }, - "822": { - "label": false, - "text": "October 2007 \n Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. ~\u00a0TC \nIf this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.", - "id": "822" - }, - "823": { - "label": false, - "text": "List of Prime Ministers of Pakistan \n\nHi, any chance you could have a look at Wikipedia:Peer review/List of Prime Ministers of Pakistan/archive1? Regards, Khan", - "id": "823" - }, - "824": { - "label": false, - "text": "not a problem. thanks and that sounds like an idea to consider!", - "id": "824" - }, - "825": { - "label": false, - "text": "Try a 72-hour block \n\nThere could be lockout on our own Weather Channel staff for 72 hours beginning on Sunday May 7th at midnight.\n\nIf they were involved? Perhaps, we could restirct access to Wikipedia from their computers at The Weather Channel at midnight on Sunday, and block their IP's, which they will not edit The Weather Channel and Intellistar article again, I apologize for the trouble that has happened. - Local on the 8's will continue to air during the lockout after Sundays until it expires in 72 hours.", - "id": "825" - }, - "826": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\n\nTroll metal doesn't exist. It never has. Calling something \"\"troll metal\"\" is a description, like \"\"fire metal\"\" or \"\"cheesy metal.\"\" It isn't an actual subgenre of black metal. First of all, I think this requires a primer in reality. First of all, reality exists outside your ego and desires of importance by contributing some irrelevant material. Secondly, reality requires observation, not invention; while you can edit wikipedia pages, you can't edit reality. Finally, reality probably hates you and wishes ill of you.\nWhen you keep these rules in mind, you're realize that troll metal is an invention and has no places in being in an archive of material floating in the objective world.\n\nI hope this helped you. Get to deleting that nonsense about troll metal! \"", - "id": "826" - }, - "827": { - "label": false, - "text": "An example, please \n\n...of your warning thing. What have I done wrong please?", - "id": "827" - }, - "828": { - "label": false, - "text": "Silicate weathering \n\nThe weathering page needs to treat silicate weathering. Could those who know add a few words about this? Silicate weathering is a global sink for CO2. During global ice ages across geological time, silicate weathering is reduced when ice sheets reduce the amount of continental crust exposed to weathering. The resulting rise in atmospheric C02 is thought to be one factor for bringing the earth out of an ice age (and, of course, setting us up for the next cycle). Is there an exemplary (illustrative) chemical reaction here, as with carbonates? Thanks in advance.", - "id": "828" - }, - "829": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\n\n\"\".. a thing called the jitterbug. Jitterbugging around, trying to surround enemy units\nwith helicopters, and it worked pretty well.\"\"\"", - "id": "829" - }, - "830": { - "label": false, - "text": "Hello! My name is Sam. I don't spam and change things that are wrong and only change things if they are wrong or too brief!", - "id": "830" - }, - "831": { - "label": false, - "text": "Your a tool \n\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tool", - "id": "831" - }, - "832": { - "label": false, - "text": "Done. Just awaiting on the final result from the Golden Globes real soon...", - "id": "832" - }, - "833": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\n\n History deleted to remove copyrighted text \n\nUnfortunately, the entire history of this article was about half full of copyrighted text \u2013 specifically, the 'Biography' section was not freely-licensed work. The MySpace page given as a reference was dead, with a note that the account had been deleted. The text, however, was also available at http://www.ci.mount-vernon.ny.us/seasonal_activities/summerbreeze/pdf/Summer%20%20Breeze%20ONLY.pdf , which is copyrighted, so there was really no choice but to delete the history.\n\nPrior to doing so, however, I removed the text in question. I then restored only that version as a foundation from which to build a new biography of Eddie F. If there are questions, please leave a note on my talk page. Thanks. - Katie \"", - "id": "833" - }, - "834": { - "label": false, - "text": "I apparently didn't do a good job with the International Home and Housewares Show page because you deleted it for copyright infrigement. How do I cite it so it isn't? I do have permission to put the information up....Please help!", - "id": "834" - }, - "835": { - "label": false, - "text": "I am confused as to why adding a catagory to 209 radio was removed and is considered unhelpful and non constructive. Please explain.", - "id": "835" - }, - "836": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\n\n Blocked for another 6 months \n\n If you wish to contribute to this encyclopedia, please create an account and log inDue to persistent vandalism (), editing by anonymous users from your school, library or institution's IP address currently disabled. You continue to have full access to read the encyclopedia. If you are logged in but still unable to edit, please follow these instructions. To prevent abuse, account creation via this IP address is probably also disabled.If accounts need to be created at school for class projects, please have your teacher or network administrator contact us (with reference to this IP address) at unblock-en-l from an email address listed on your school's website. Alternatively, if you have no Internet access at home, you may email us using your school-issued email address, telling us your preferred username. An account will be created for you. Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken.Thank you. \"", - "id": "836" - }, - "837": { - "label": false, - "text": "I dug up one mention of Broyce G. Jacobs from Cardston I am little confused as to whether it indicates he is deceased or not. I also e-mailed the constituency office with my inquiry.", - "id": "837" - }, - "838": { - "label": false, - "text": "These things damage my credibility in the long run as they crowd my block log and give other admins the impression that i'm a problem editor.", - "id": "838" - }, - "839": { - "label": false, - "text": "HI BUDDY \n\nDo you have alerts set up on my page to know when an edit is made or something.", - "id": "839" - }, - "840": { - "label": false, - "text": "Thanks for the reply. However, in case of Anupam Kher, he has specifically in recent times, acted as a voice for the Kashmiri Pandit comunity and taken up their cause for rehabilitation in the valley. -", - "id": "840" - }, - "841": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"== This is about candy, not artists ==\nAs such, while \"\"filmmaker Charlie Panian\"\" may be deserving of a page, it isn't this one. If you want to start a page about Charlie Panian, then please link to some critiques of his work as well. ~ Imagine I swore. \"", - "id": "841" - }, - "842": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"::Yes, as well as on Peiser's discussion. If you think that this merits a \"\"consensus\"\" then our definitions of the word vary. Essentially, what is happening is that Peiser's work is being diminished on Oreskes' page (which should focus on her biography and relative importance) and being highlighted on the Peiser page which should do the same for him. You are attempting to diminish his positions on both pages so that a person looking for the link on Peiser will not be able to identify the basis of the controversy. \n\n\"", - "id": "842" - }, - "843": { - "label": false, - "text": "They weren't showing up because someone messed up the reference they were adding about the gay magazine. I also removed Multiracial Americans, pending a source that describes him as Multiracial.", - "id": "843" - }, - "844": { - "label": false, - "text": "Croke Park is a GAA arena but since it falls into cat. 2, I propose that it be removed once the Ariva stadium is complete", - "id": "844" - }, - "845": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\n\n \"\"The Journal of the Society for Psychical Research has been published continuously since 1884, promoting the Society's aim of examining \"\"without prejudice or prepossession and in a scientific spirit those faculties of man, real or supposed, which appear to be inexplicable on any generally recognised hypothesis. The Journal's contents reflect the wide range of our contributors' specialisms and interests and include reports of current laboratory and fieldwork research, as well as theoretical, methodological and historical papers with a bearing on the field of parapsychology.\"\" \n\nQuoted from the SPR website: \"\"All papers submitted to the Journal are strictly peer-reviewed\"\". So your accusation is not based on any facts Goblin Face. Obviously the IP address you cite is different from this \"\"jamenta\"\" IP address, so again, you are coming up with a very spurious and inauthentic accusation here. I prefer to remain anonymous as you have, for obvious reasons - not the least of which is false accusation and libel.\"", - "id": "845" - }, - "846": { - "label": false, - "text": "Yes, I think you should stop.. There is no damn debate, only the most ignorant human beings to ever grace the face of the earth think there's a debate.. this is ridiculous, you decide, right now.. is this an encyclopedia, or a propaganda rag?????", - "id": "846" - }, - "847": { - "label": false, - "text": "contrary to what is written in this article, several sources I have come across have emphasized the fact that dermatofibromas never develop into basal cell carcinoma.", - "id": "847" - }, - "848": { - "label": false, - "text": "I've hidden the description of how to pronounce the sound. My reason for doing so is most of all that the character is used in several languages, and I believe it's wrong to assume that the pronounciation is similar in all non-English languages (also when it is similar in some). I'm also convinced that an article designated for vowel-sounds would be a better place. A link to such an article would surely be the best. -) \n\nI do also feel awkward about the notes on being an umlaut and on alphabetization, which I actually feel would fit much better in the articles on the different alphabets.", - "id": "848" - }, - "849": { - "label": false, - "text": "\":Whilst agreeing that touring is not a requirement of being \"\"active\"\", I only partly agree that they have been \"\"active\"\" in the last 2 years.If The Endless River was a new album, fine, but it is \"\"based on material recorded in 1993 and 1994\"\" with some minor re-recording, mixing and overdubs - by a selection of people, not just Gilmour and Mason.Personally I am not convinced that this means \"\"the band\"\" have been active, but, rather than refuse the request, would be interested in others opinions. - \n\n\"", - "id": "849" - }, - "850": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\n\n-\"\"Supernatural\"\" has an incorrect pronounciation. The latter mentioned above, pronounced 'when-di-go', is the correct and generally accepted version.\"", - "id": "850" - }, - "851": { - "label": false, - "text": "or denigrating the majority of", - "id": "851" - }, - "852": { - "label": false, - "text": "Involving yourself\nDon't want to comment further at knowledgekid's talk page, but is it really necessary for you to insert yourself? This hardly seems reason enough. (Talkie-Talkie)", - "id": "852" - }, - "853": { - "label": false, - "text": "[unsigned question left by 210.54.239.237 on 13 March 2006]", - "id": "853" - }, - "854": { - "label": false, - "text": ">>>I second your non-ironic awe. Excellent work. Thanks.", - "id": "854" - }, - "855": { - "label": false, - "text": "Show you're an all powerful wikipedia admin and contact my provider (telenet) and ban me. This is what you was your threat, wasn't it? Well, I call your bluff. Do it.", - "id": "855" - }, - "856": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\n\nFair use rationale for Image:Hatenko.PNG\n\nThanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Hatenko.PNG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.\n\nIf you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the \"\"my contributions\"\" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting \"\"Image\"\" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (Converse) \"", - "id": "856" - }, - "857": { - "label": false, - "text": "Is there some reason why the link for Anna-Marie Erd\u00f6dy in this article directs back to this page? Seems misleading. A mistake?76.204.97.164", - "id": "857" - }, - "858": { - "label": false, - "text": "Work in progress! 216.52.185.72", - "id": "858" - }, - "859": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\nJanetteDoe, I appreciate your finding and uploading the Rao articles. However, this can easily become an endless discussion. For some other Yadav-apologist will soon come along and find an even more obscure source than Rao, and then you\u2014conscientious and rigorous to a degree that the Yadav apologists are not and have no intention, aware or unaware, of being\u2014will go scurrying again for the article. After that we all will try to interpret it, weighing the pros and cons, again to a degree the apologists will not, for they will be busy looking for the next roadblock to toss in our path. \n\nI think we can't make the determination of whether Rao applies here or not, at least not yet. Let the secondary sources do that. We need to rely on recent scholarship, especially that in textbooks, published by academic presses and vetted both before and after publication by reviewers from a wide range of scholarly and journalistic backgrounds. Two such books, by Susan Bayly and Christophe Jaffrelot, both widely used in universities around the world, both reviewed extensively in the literature, are being used in the article. Let the article writing (or rewriting) proceed based on these (or similar) books. Once the article has been fleshed out, we can come back to the issue of Rao. Otherwise, nothing will get done, and those of us, who've taken time out from our other Wikipedia (not to speak RL) pursuits to attend to the article, will slowly walk away, out of touch and out of sympathy. \u00abTalk\u00bb \"", - "id": "859" - }, - "860": { - "label": false, - "text": "I also please you to stop reverting my edits. I have no desire to wage an edit war aganist you, nor I have desire to be blocked. I am also sure that you don't want neither of that. I am ready to extend an olive branch to you, but please don't revert my work. Also, you should see my latest post at Talk:Prime Minister of Yugoslavia.", - "id": "860" - }, - "861": { - "label": false, - "text": "This page should not be speedy deleted because... \n\nIt would be helpful to point out specific instances where neutrality was believed to have been violated. This is a well-intentioned post about an influential business figure. Please move patiently. I am new and trying to figure out the appropriate formatting, and methods of communication. \n\n TylerHayleyogilvyone", - "id": "861" - }, - "862": { - "label": false, - "text": "I reworded that, and moved the picture down so it does not crowd the text of the first paragraph. The stuff about Leibniz is explicitly mentioned in the commented reference, by the way. \u2014\u00a0Carl (\u00a0\u00b7\u00a0talk)", - "id": "862" - }, - "863": { - "label": false, - "text": "I support getting rid of dates as well. Polish intervention in Russia would every of those issues.", - "id": "863" - }, - "864": { - "label": false, - "text": "If you have cause to block me, then I invite you to do so.", - "id": "864" - }, - "865": { - "label": false, - "text": "}}\n\n{{WikiProject R&B; and Soul Music|and/orclass=C|importance=Mid", - "id": "865" - }, - "866": { - "label": false, - "text": "Danny Wallace\nHi Ian, I have added in a new photograph to replace the image of Danny Wallace that you took at an event last week. This was at the request of Danny, who likes the picture, but thinks it is a bit too blurry. The picture now on his wikipedia is his official photo. Message me with any questions.", - "id": "866" - }, - "867": { - "label": false, - "text": "Transistor \n\nThe transistor page does not have a Principle of Operation section, because \n\na)the physicists know about it but don't want to share it\nb)they just don't know how it works\n\nI was thinking about it and came up with a fairly decent concept of how it works, I put it on WIKI, I think the guys got jealous, and here I am, discussing pretty much nothing. \n\nPS: and my language is pathetic, you naughty naughty boy,..I'll eat you...:)))", - "id": "867" - }, - "868": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\n\n]]\nHello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:\nIntroduction\nThe five pillars of Wikipedia\nHow to edit a page\nHow to write a great article\nManual of Style\nAlso feel free to make test edits in the sandbox.\nI hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages''', and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to leave me a message or place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help. (talk / contribs) \"", - "id": "868" - }, - "869": { - "label": false, - "text": "You have been reported again 1.", - "id": "869" - }, - "870": { - "label": false, - "text": "\" August 2009 (UTC)\n\nIt is generally considered acceptable to remove personal attacks, though there are some who disagree with that. If when you remove a personal attack you are reverted, then do not remove it again. Instead seek an outside party to investigate, preferably on some sort of public noticeboard. I really do not know the first thing about the Ireland dispute and from what little I have heard I don't want to touch it with a 10 foot poll.\n\nNo, there are not different standards for different editors. There is however a gap between the treatment of those who know how to work with the system, and those who do not grasp the intricate details. While Wikipedia claims not to be a bureaucracy does in fact share many similar traits with a bureaucracy. Knowing the correct \"\"form\"\", noticeboard or procedure will take you far, knowing the tone and content expected from said processes and presenting in that fashion will take you even farther. It is a bit of a shame that such an advantage is given to those who know the ins and outs but it is the way things end up working here. Chillum 01:01, 14\"", - "id": "870" - }, - "871": { - "label": false, - "text": "\". Fedor said, - I want to stay on top and show people that Russian fighters are very good,\"\" he said. \"\"I want to represent myself and to be honored by the Russian people.\"\" \n\"", - "id": "871" - }, - "872": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\nHi Himaja.gaddam, and Welcome to Wikipedia! \nWelcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.\n\nIf you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page \u2014 I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.\n\n \nHere are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...\n\n Finding your way around: \n\n Table of Contents\n\n Department directory\n\n Need help? \n\n Questions \u2014 a guide on where to ask questions.\n Cheatsheet \u2014 quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes.\n\n Wikipedia's 5 pillars \u2014 an overview of Wikipedia's foundations\n The Simplified Ruleset \u2014 a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules.\n\n How you can help: \n\n Contributing to Wikipedia \u2014 a guide on how you can help.\n\n Community Portal \u2014 Wikipedia's hub of activity.\n\n Additional tips... \n\n Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your \"\"signature\"\" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this. \n\n If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you. \n\n Good luck, and have fun. \"", - "id": "872" - }, - "873": { - "label": false, - "text": "Too much trouble. . . \n\nLook, I know that those of you who no longer sleep because of this article know that I have added a section talking about how there are quite a few notable people, such as the founder of the Weather Channel, say that Global Warming is just the biggest scam in history. I think that we need to compromise.", - "id": "873" - }, - "874": { - "label": false, - "text": "There are a whole lot more CSDs than those that appear on the log. Notice that I say some appear on the log, that isn't even the start of it. Probably less than 1% of my CSDs were not perfect. If you'd like, I could go through your edit history and talk page and point out every mistake that you have ever made. You need to read the following policies to start WP:AGF, WP:BITE. In your RFA process, it was pointed out that you too misused the CSD tags here here here here and countless other times. So, before you go WP:BITEing a user who is making good-faith edits and making block threats, you should read the policies a bit more clearly and see that you too are not perfect.", - "id": "874" - }, - "875": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\nJust a friendly reminder that there still remains one last fix before the article will pass. Thanks, comment! \"", - "id": "875" - }, - "876": { - "label": false, - "text": "Oh, one more thing: the way the article is written, there seems to be no question that the killings and eatings took place. It does not appear to be in dispute. And that's why I was so surprised at the pushback I got in trying to create even a sub-heading.", - "id": "876" - }, - "877": { - "label": false, - "text": "That's very sweet of you.", - "id": "877" - }, - "878": { - "label": false, - "text": "WP:BLP Violations \n\nI just removed another of your reverts which placed defamatory and uncited materials into Cherokee Freedmen Controversy. WP:COI may apply to you since you seem to edit African American related articles and Freedmen controversies. Your dishonest edit summary was over the top.", - "id": "878" - }, - "879": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\n\n I almost agree with you too, except the sky isn't actually blue, and there isn't much point in providing truly self-evident non-information in the first place. ;-) (talk) \u2704 \u2704 \u2704TAB \"", - "id": "879" - }, - "880": { - "label": false, - "text": "Thanks for the detailed explanation.", - "id": "880" - }, - "881": { - "label": false, - "text": "Bill Stewart \n\nI took a photo of the picture of him in the Fiesta Bowl program.", - "id": "881" - }, - "882": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\n\n Congratulations! \n The Excellent New Editor's BarnstarA new editor on the right path Excellent work on Water Supply and Sanitation in Zimbabwe. Looking forward to further contributions from you! . \"", - "id": "882" - }, - "883": { - "label": false, - "text": "- the three others had not been at the 'eternity clause' article previously)", - "id": "883" - }, - "884": { - "label": false, - "text": "Regarding edits made during October 9 2007 (UTC)\nPlease do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. guitarist", - "id": "884" - }, - "885": { - "label": false, - "text": "| Talk 20:09, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)", - "id": "885" - }, - "886": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\n{| style=\"\"background-color:#ddcef2; padding:0;\"\" cellpadding=\"\"0\"\"\n|style=\"\"border:1px solid #000000; background-color:#ddcef2; vertical-align:top; color:#000000;\"\"|\n Hello, ! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. We're so glad you're here! If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below or place on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills, the sandbox is for you. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! \u2014 \n{| width=\"\"100%\"\" style=\"\"background-color:#ddcef2;\"\"\n|style=\"\"width: 55%; border:1px solid #ddcef2; background-color:#ddcef2; vertical-align:top\"\"|\n Getting started A tutorial \u2022 Our five pillars \u2022 Getting mentored\n How to: edit a page \u2022 upload and use images Getting help Frequently asked questions \u2022 Tips\n Where to ask questions or make comments\n Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view \u2022 No original research \n Verifiability \u2022 Reliable sources \u2022 Citing sources\n What Wikipedia is not \u2022 Biographies of living persons\n\n Manual of Style \u2022 Three-revert rule \u2022 Sock puppetry\n Copyrights \u2022 Policy for non-free content \u2022 Image use policy\n External links \u2022 Spam \u2022 Vandalism\n Deletion policy \u2022 Conflict of interest \u2022 Notability\n|class=\"\"MainPageBG\"\" style=\"\"width: 55%; border:1px solid #ddcef2; background-color:#ddcef2; vertical-align:top\"\"|\n{| width=\"\"100%\"\" cellpadding=\"\"0\"\" cellspacing=\"\"5\"\" style=\"\"vertical-align:top; background-color:#ddcef2\"\"\n! The community\n|-\n|style=\"\"color:#000\"\"|\n Build consensus \u2022 Resolve disputes\n [[Wikipedia:Assume good faith|Assume good fa", - "id": "886" - }, - "887": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"==Speedy deletion==\n\nHey, I just finished writing this article and it is for speedy deletion. I think the article is well written and has enough sources. I'm not promoting Songr, I just wrote about it, its features etc. Please, some help here! [ Let's talk ] \"", - "id": "887" - }, - "888": { - "label": false, - "text": "|mask=Talk:Armenian Genocide/Arguments|mask=Talk:Armenian Genocide/Fadix Analysis|mask=Talk:Armenian Genocide/Proposed Refactor", - "id": "888" - }, - "889": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\nPerhaps I seem to be repeating myself as you are repeatedly ignoring what I'm writing. The tables are unclear as the order of the product is unclear from them. E.g. the top-right corner of the first table is e6. But does that mean e1 \u00d7 e7 = e6 or e7 \u00d7 e1 = e6 ? It would not matter if the product is commutative but as it's not the tables are ambiguous. That is why tables are a very poor way to show the product, and probably why none of the sources use them.\nAnd again please read MOS:LEAD in paticular the section on providing an accessible overview. Or look at the articles already mentioned, Special relativity and Cross product. Or one you are familiar with, Pythagorean theorem. Or a similarly advanced article to this one (and a featured article), Laplace\u2013Runge\u2013Lenz vector. There should be little or no maths in the introduction: perhaps a statement of the product, but nothing else. Certainly not the page of detailed mathematical working and argument that there is now.wordsdeeds \"", - "id": "889" - }, - "890": { - "label": false, - "text": "Request: New Dallas Mexican consulate offices\nHi! Consulate-General of Mexico in Dallas moved to 1210 River Bend drive. Would you want to photograph the new consulate, like you did the old one?\n\nAnd at some point would you be willing to photograph places in Irving, Texas? Thanks", - "id": "890" - }, - "891": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\n\n OR removed from page \n\nI removed the following section due to its entirely being original research and speculation. Per User:SteveLoughran's request, here it is.\n\nThe implementation details of S3 are not documented, but it is possible to infer aspects of it from the behaviour (and pricing) of the service.\n\n There is an S3 repository in the US; there is another in Europe. Their locations are not public.\n From an EC2 server, read access can initially be slow. This could imply that S3 data is not always in the same physical location as all the EC2 servers. \n Amazon do not bill for data transferred between the US EC2 server farm and the US S3 store, but they do for access between the servers and the European S3 store. While the S3 store and the EC2 servers may be in separate locations, they must be close enough together that cost of transferring data is neglible. Both services are presumably hosted on the same Metropolitan Area Ethernet.\n Connectivity between the S3 datastores and the rest of the Internet is good. This implies they are close to one of the main Internet exchanges.\n After the initial slow access, later accesses are fast. This could imply that the data is cached.\n Write access is tangibly slower than writing to a local hard disk. Amazon guarantee that when the operation has completed, data has been written to disk in multiple locations. \n Amazon warn that even after data has been written, old values may still be read. This implies that there can be more than one cache of the data, and that every GET request does not trigger a check from the front-end caches to the back-end store.\n Amazon adjusted their initial pricing from a simple flat rate per GB to one that charges small frequently retrieved items per thousand GET or HEAD operations, rather than purely per byte. There may be a flat cost for every entry (indexing, billing entries) and a per-request cost in CPU-time for every access. These fixed overheads are now billed for.\n\nThe dynamic per-bucket DNS entries are implemented by having a custom S3 DNS server that returns a hostname for every host under the s3.amazonaws.com subdomain, even if a bucket of that name has never been created: \n> nslookup made-up-name-for-wikipedia.s3.amazonaws.com\n\nNon-authoritative answer:\nmade-up-name-for-wikipedia.s3.amazonaws.com canonical name = s3-directional-w.amazonaws.com.\ns3-directional-w.amazonaws.com canonical name = s3-1-w.amazonaws.com.\nName: s3-1-w.amazonaws.com\nAddress: 72.21.211.228\n\nAt the identified host, there is a web server that always serves up 404 error pages when a GET request against a nonexistent bucket is issued.\n\n> telnet made-up-name-for-wikipedia.s3.amazonaws.com 80\nTrying 72.21.207.212...\nConnected to s3-1-w.amazonaws.com.\nEscape character is '^]'.\nGET / HTTP/1.0\nhost: made-up-name-for-wikipedia.s3.amazonaws.com\n\nHTTP/1.1 404 Not Found\nx-amz-request-id: F0F7301EF1873635\nx-amz-id-2: 9gT/YmUa7EZXIm9FNv7GGThAre8Kn5CEfXpoJpthwuq54Pm+5RRcThAdBa20XsLj\nContent-Type: application/xml\nDate: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 18:54:42 GMT\nConnection: close\nServer: AmazonS3\n\n\nNoSuchBucket\nThe specified bucket does not exist\nF0F7301EF1873635\nmade-up-name-for-wikipedia\n9gT/YmUa7EZXIm9FNv7GGThAre8Kn5CEfXpoJpthwuq54Pm+5RRcThAdBa20XsLj\n\nConnection closed by foreign host.\n\nNotice how the XML error text is intended for machine interpretation, rather than end users. The RequestId element can be used in support requests, as Amazon log every request, at least for a few days.\"", - "id": "891" - }, - "892": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\n\n Deletion of Dave Warwak page \n\nWondering why is was necessary to delete the page on Dave Warwak, an educator of vegan practices and animal rights. I see that your comment on the reason for deletion was \"\"the only thing he is known for is being fired\"\" however that is not the case in the animal friendly, vegetarian, vegan community. In fact he is praised by many for his passion in properly educating children about the origins of their food. Why would you find it so crucial to \"\"speedy\"\" delete a page that simply speaks of CRUELTY FREE living, and aims to educate people on the truth about their \"\"food\"\"? Is that information threatening to Wikipedia for some reason? And I wouldn't think as a wiki admin that your OPINION on the topic is reason enough to control what info is available and what is deleted. YOU may know Mr. Warwak as only being fired, but being the intelligent science studying individual that you are, surly you must realize that his efforts to educate children and promote compassion for animals is actually very honorable and deserving of recognition. PLEASE show a little compassion yourself and undelete the page.\"", - "id": "892" - }, - "893": { - "label": false, - "text": "I apologize for identifiing your modification as vandalism while it wasn't, next time please do not just remove piece of article without filling in why you wiped whole section", - "id": "893" - }, - "894": { - "label": false, - "text": "\":ok, it turns out that MJ's \"\"Official Website\"\" completely forgot about Motown. So, I haven't a clue, and give up for now. 5 July 2005 06:12 (UTC)\n\n\"", - "id": "894" - }, - "895": { - "label": false, - "text": "There wasn't really an appropriate place to mention the show's surrealism in the article - let alone with sources - but I've shoehorned it in anyways simply because I really don't feel like dealing with any more passive-aggressive, aspergers-fueled messages from you.", - "id": "895" - }, - "896": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\n\nI'm not sure if Talk \"", - "id": "896" - }, - "897": { - "label": false, - "text": "Addendum: I've emailed my concerns regarding the edits by Elainiea Constantine to the oversight team. 88.104.31.21", - "id": "897" - }, - "898": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\nThat's fine, but this nonsense about me having an ego trip really is absurd. I really think it's time for WP:TEA, Vorlath, don't you? I'm more than willing to accept your order, however. .Alpaugh \"", - "id": "898" - }, - "899": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\n\n BTW, what's a \"\"numerable open cover\"\"? - \"", - "id": "899" - }, - "900": { - "label": false, - "text": "\" July 2008 (UTC)\nWhy, that is, or rather, was, written in the article... Hey, Xasha, surely, that one statement sums up the stance of the EU on that matter - \"\"Call it as you want, we're not interfering, let's all live in peace, bros.\"\"? 19:16, 24\"", - "id": "900" - }, - "901": { - "label": false, - "text": "This is not a place for cranks or conspiracy theorists Hey dude, if you are DENYING that it was Ford that put that stuff out, YOU ARE THE CRANK, OK? Get past your ego and admit the fact you MAY NOT KNOW A WHOLE LOT. Ok, bubba? Go to Henry Ford's page - it's even on there.\n\nSheesh, talk about the blind leading the blind.84.28.82.149", - "id": "901" - }, - "902": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\nI've had just about enough of your shithead behavior. I said nothing wrong with my comment, and my comment was only factual. If you want to debate what is and isn't worthy of a goddamned encylopedic entry, then I'm sure you're better off arguing with a wall. Shame on you for censoring and removing content of a TALK-PAGE ARTICLE COMMENT. Thankfully you can't edit or destroy the page-history, so people can see just exactly what you removed and how simple you are. For fucks sake, SNS is not a reliable source, and any news outlet that believes so intentionally delves into bad journalistic endeavors. The article is being removed, deal with it dude. Grow up and acknowledge certain facts, and I'm going to end the conversation at that because I've already spent enough time trying to use the simplest of English sentences to outline and debate this idea with full clarity, yet you still can't understand. You want a BLP violation? You've got autism you cold retarded fuck. (By the way, if you don't think a picture of an asian man along with the author's name being \"\"Gil Asakawa\"\" would certainly clarify that the author is indeed Asian, you're simply completely wrong in likely every regard of life itself that requires any sense of observation skills 71.94.7.228 \"", - "id": "902" - }, - "903": { - "label": false, - "text": "Re your article to Deathscythe\n\nActually, the Endless Waltz version is simply the manga version of the MS, not a redesign done specifically for EW.", - "id": "903" - }, - "904": { - "label": false, - "text": "Hello, many thanks for the note. It works for me (too slow IMHO, but it works!). Many thanks to all of you. Dferg (w:en: - w:es:)", - "id": "904" - }, - "905": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\n\nYou're right Milo. A consensus of scientists in the scientific field of parapsychology. Only that. Wikipedia follows the scientific consensus in the field. We don't ask psychologists what the conditions are inside a neutron star. We really don't care what they have to say. And of course, we would present the viewpoints of the critics of parapsychology, and more so than with other articles on science. I have absolutely no desire not to accurately present what the critics have to say.\n\nEven if I were pushing parapsychology, I still would not try to censor the critics, because that would only detract from my case- the reader would be able to tell it was a whitewash.\n\n\"\"For stability reasons, I don't think the article can take that approach. It would require constant maintenance and never-ending dispute resolvements.\"\" Nealparr, that is why I'm talking about an ArbCom decision. I want you to continue with what you are doing. It is great to get it stable for now with this definition of NPOV. In fact, I doubt there will be much that is materially different when we get it straightened out. I wrote everything I wrote from the perspective I would think the article would eventually have anyway. So you know exactly how I would think it should be presented. There are only a few tweaks I'd make different, like calling it a scientific field to begin with, and possibly saying directly which types of psi scientists in the field think are real. So keep doing what you're doing, OK? '''''' (Talk \u03a8 Contribs) \"", - "id": "905" - }, - "906": { - "label": false, - "text": "Yeah, I'm sure. Very few women who have publicists and take their clothes off for Maxim are terribly interested in privacy. And nobody who announces on their website that they're cutting over services that people have already paid for and will mess with their online credit if they ask their credit card companies for the refunds they're entitled to is anything but a scam artist. If you've got a better term for somebody who announces they're keeping money for services they refuse to provide, feel free to substitute it. Remember, under WP:BLP, since she announced it herself, its sufficiently sourced.", - "id": "906" - }, - "907": { - "label": false, - "text": "Can you delete my account? \n\nI have a really bad reputation and people keep bothering me about it, I have made second accounts, blanked my talk page, and many other things but I can not get rid of it. Can you delete my account so I can create a new one and start over? I would really appreciate it if you did because I want to start over new and have a better reputation. User:Daniel Chiswick 9 May, 2007.", - "id": "907" - }, - "908": { - "label": false, - "text": "\" August 2014 (UTC)\nOK, thanks once again. Lately the anti-Polish man that goes by the name \"\"English Patriot Man\"\" woke up again and started to ruin Wikipedia. Take a look at the changes provided by the IP address: \"\"83.24.216.55\"\" what are all here:\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Racism_in_Europe&action;=history\nCould you check if the damages performed by this IP address were all fixed by User:Discospinster?\nAs you can see the English \"\"Patriot\"\" Man (this time as an undercover IP) once again deleted all the information about the prejudice against Poles, and I don't know how to restore the version that was right before his numerous contribustions. 13:16, 23\"", - "id": "908" - }, - "909": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\n\nUlises\nA {{prod}} template has been added to the article Ulises, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also \"\"What Wikipedia is not\"\" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. \"", - "id": "909" - }, - "910": { - "label": false, - "text": "Yes, I understood that as such. I do believe that he ought to be included in that class of Americans but as you point out, no such category has been created for that to occur. I added that to Malcolm X's categories actually realizing that after I had made the addition. However, I kept in the article because I was hoping that someone would simply add the category. However, after you reverted my edit, I relented based on your reasoning which is why I specifically added the category Assassinated People to the article - because it was an existing category. Instead, you have reverted that edit, entirely defeating the action which I had taken which was to broaden the murder of Malcolm X into not just a racial consequence, but a human consequence as well. It is the same with Martin Luther King. While each of these people were Civil Rights leaders who were assassinated they were also human activists attempting to make the world a better place who were murdered. As such I was trying to include Martin Luther King and Malcolm X along with people like John F. Kennedy, Robert Kennedy, Mahatma Gandhi, Jawaharlal Nehru - in a broader specter of significant humans that were assassinated... However, you removed that edit. I give up...", - "id": "910" - }, - "911": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"==Etymology==\nThis etymological discussion is simply wrong in so many ways:\nThe Greek name tigris comes from the Old Persian word for \"\"tiger\"\" and means \"\"the fast one\"\". It might also be argued to come from Kurdish too. In Kurdish \"\"Tir\"\" means arrow. This means that the river is quick and fast like an arrow.T\u00eej-T\u00fbj means sharp, pointing and cutting. Since the letter \"\"j\"\" doesn't exist in Greek T\u00eej-T\u00fbj became Tig later Tigr.In Greek at the end of words -is sonex is used (T\u00eej-Tijr-Tig-Tigr-Tigris). \n\nFirst of all, the Persian for \"\"tiger\"\" is babr, not tigr or anything like it. The Greek word \"\"tigris\"\" meaning \"\"tiger\"\" may be related to Persian words within the same family as \"\"*tigr\"\", but that is not the Persian meaning of the words.\n\nSecond, the Kurdish (and Farsi) word for \"\"arrow\"\", tir, comes from Middle Persian tigr which also means \"\"arrow\"\".\n\nThird, the word tij (or rather tiz) \"\"sharp\"\" is certainly related to tigr, but they belong to the same word family they are not the same word.\n\nI'll try to come up with something better.\"", - "id": "911" - }, - "912": { - "label": false, - "text": "This talk page is full of sycophancy... \n\n...so let me let you know that I don't like Wikipedia ONE BIT.", - "id": "912" - }, - "913": { - "label": false, - "text": "The page alternates between present and past tense. This needs to all be in present. 19:43, July 30, 2005 (UTC)", - "id": "913" - }, - "914": { - "label": false, - "text": "Vegeta, what does the scouter say about his power level?", - "id": "914" - }, - "915": { - "label": false, - "text": "Bingo! Glee Volume 1, Glee Volume 2, [http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql;=10:gjfrxzusldfe Glee Volume 3 (standard, link to deluxe is there). Each has a full credits list. The EPs should be there, too.", - "id": "915" - }, - "916": { - "label": false, - "text": "Barelvi\nI expect your further cooperation in improving Barelvi Page Article which is disliked by some section.Many People regularly tries to put Negative Info about this movement.If u have time may i suggest u something from neutral point of view regarding this Article?Non constructive edits have lead this situation there.I tried a bit aggressively to tell others that people are editing it according their agenda.", - "id": "916" - }, - "917": { - "label": false, - "text": "Amcom article \n\nHi\n\nEarlier today I noticed that there is no article on Amcom, and I posted on the Amnet talk page, before moving it to talk:Amcom (because although the network is called Amnet, the actual company is called Amcom).\nI didn't realize until later that there was already an Amcom (actually Amnet) page that had been deleted. After reading the explanation for the deletion, I'm not sure whether Amcom really has enough notability or not. However, if we do want to make an Amcom page we will have to supply some secondary sources to justify the company's notability.\n\nIf you are still interested, take a look at this article I found: \n\nIf you want to reply to me, make sure you either reply on my talk page, or leave a note there saying that you have replied elsewhere. Otherwise, I won't know that you've replied.\n\nWelcome and good luck!\n-", - "id": "917" - }, - "918": { - "label": false, - "text": "Where was it actually agreed upon, Constantzeanu? What I notice with Russian etc. contributors is thta they have only and quite reasonably agreed to present the data as is and allow you to comment upon it further below in the page. And, as I have said, I to support this approach: it is not our right to manipulate census data, since we did not take the census.", - "id": "918" - }, - "919": { - "label": false, - "text": "I posted a reply at Wikipedia:Editor_assistance/Requests#MOSIX_article. |trottel |humor me", - "id": "919" - }, - "920": { - "label": false, - "text": "Can you supply a source for recommended terminology for various human races and mixes of races?", - "id": "920" - }, - "921": { - "label": false, - "text": "College Athletes\nAre college athletes notable enough, save nationally known ones (i.e. Anthony Gonzalez), to be included in this list? Thought I'd get some opinions before deleting them. Talk", - "id": "921" - }, - "922": { - "label": false, - "text": "Inic: I know this is all too overwhelming for you. I suggest you follow your advice. Perhaps you can contribute in a more positive way. What so you say? 12.176.152.194", - "id": "922" - }, - "923": { - "label": false, - "text": "TemplateData is here", - "id": "923" - }, - "924": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\nIt was \"\"British and Irish Lions\"\" in the 1970s, though media in Britain nearly always referred to them as 'British Lions'. I remember the name way before 2001. \"", - "id": "924" - }, - "925": { - "label": false, - "text": "Don't worry. \n\nDon't worry, keep editing and adding stuff of your knowledge. You made lots of edits, I have to read the whole page. The release dates are not that important, so please, stop changing it all the time. As long as the year is correct... it's fine.", - "id": "925" - }, - "926": { - "label": false, - "text": "Thank you very much! You are much more friendly that some other admins I have met on wikipedia. Hint* Ryulong", - "id": "926" - }, - "927": { - "label": false, - "text": "Agreed with below. This page serves to reveal the methods behind many classic gaffed effects in card magic. It would be better to removing the parts that contain method and simply stick to what effect the deck ACCOMPLISHES. Magicians in the online community have become used to exposures on YouTube and other sites, but an easily searchable database of text explanations greatly reduces the barrier for an interested party to find the method. Wikipedia should not just aggregate all the methods in magic, as fewer people would benefit from the knowledge (beginners, etc) than would suffer (professional magicians, kids, etc).", - "id": "927" - }, - "928": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\nRegardless of the fact that in my frustration I called for the deletion of my article, does that not configure under a \"\"veiled criticism\"\" of sorts that was apparently the reason for my temporary suspension? \"", - "id": "928" - }, - "929": { - "label": false, - "text": "I've replied to your comment at User talk:Richi#October_2007 ...", - "id": "929" - }, - "930": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\nWhen contributing in future, please try not to create pages you're personally involved in. As the policy says; \"\"Wikipedia is not for things made up one afternoon\"\". If it isn't a notable project, which you should've been able to see that this isn't, it shouldn't be included. lds \"", - "id": "930" - }, - "931": { - "label": false, - "text": "Which theories make testable predictions is debatable..and will be debated!", - "id": "931" - }, - "932": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\n\n Just out of curiosity \n\n(and because I had to turn a request down that you sorted out instead) - \"\"see OTRS ticket #2013120610010869\"\". How? I don't think I've ever seen an OTRS ticket. \"", - "id": "932" - }, - "933": { - "label": false, - "text": "Fischer's comments re the 9/11 attacks \n\nI have added quotations which should probably be summarized & pulled back (note that some are directly relevant to the antisemitism section). But I put them in as quotations for now b/c I wasn't sure folks were aware of just how far off the deep end our friend went....", - "id": "933" - }, - "934": { - "label": false, - "text": "getting images released, will not happen. Due to copyright complexity its not possible to release those images freely. Because wikipedia only permission is not enough, wikipedia only images are still non-free. the current usage of non-free content is almost purely cosmetic and is why they where removed. those images fail part three of the non-free media policy. Honestly it doesnt matter what the owners of the game say, they have zero control over the content of the article. \u03b2command", - "id": "934" - }, - "935": { - "label": false, - "text": "on a non-reliable source", - "id": "935" - }, - "936": { - "label": false, - "text": "Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me.", - "id": "936" - }, - "937": { - "label": false, - "text": "C'mon, who really checks references? Me myself didn't, until yesterday\nSo- as you admit- people do look at reference dates. After all, this is what you yourself just did.", - "id": "937" - }, - "938": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\nI am sure, that when the technological problems are out of the way, the material on the site will serve as very good online (and hence, accessible) reference material. May I, for a next time, ask you to sign your posts? Thank you, and hope to see you around! T C \"", - "id": "938" - }, - "939": { - "label": false, - "text": "test 2. [[User:Talk_Zordrac|(Talk)]] [http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Darwikinism Darwikinist], [http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Association_of_Wikipedians_Who_Dislike_Making_Broad_Judgements_About_the_Worthiness_of_a_General_Category_of_Article%2C_and_Who_Are_In_Favor_of_the_Deletion_of_Some_Particularly_Bad_Articles%2C_but_That_Doesn%27t_Mean_They_are_Deletionist wishy washy] and [http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Eventualism Eventualist]]]", - "id": "939" - }, - "940": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\n\nSockpuppetry case\n \nYour name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Shravanshetty502 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. \"", - "id": "940" - }, - "941": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"Fish-man, hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for taking the time to examine Wikipedia policies and base your arguments for keeping No-boo on them, and also for being polite when making your arguments. VfD pages really aren't the place for me to be making lengthy arguments, so I'll respond to your points here instead.\n\nFirst, you should be aware that anonymous users who sign up for accounts just to argue about the article being voted on are still effectively anonymous users, and are still not going to have their votes counted. At this point I think it is really too late for you to establish a history at Wikipedia that would result in your vote being counted. Again I refer you to Wikipedia:Deletion_guidelines_for_administrators#Rough_consensus for this information. (Anonymous authors who request that their articles be deleted are often given consideration, but not those who want them kept.)\nWhether they're specifically enumerated on What Wikipedia is not or not, articles about neologisms are not encyclopedia material. Firstly, #2 on that page indicates that Wikipedia articles are not dictionary definitions, and as a neologism is just a particular kind of word, an article on a neologism is necessarily a dictionary definition. Secondly, encyclopedia articles cannot describe neologisms because they cannot describe things that are as yet unestablished. \"\"No-boo\"\" may or may not be a word with some currency today, but it remains to be seen whether it will become part of the language. Once we can determine that the term has staying power and is culturally or historically significant\u2014which time will likely not come for months or years\u2014then we can write an article on it. Or rather, we could, if it weren't going to be just a dictionary definition.\nIf the article in question is not about a word but actually about an event called \"\"The No-boo Affair\"\", then it ought to be entitled No-boo Affair. In that case, I would still vote to delete it, on the grounds that it is a news story. Again, there is no evidence at this time that this news story is going to have any historical significance, and considering that the substance of the news story is \"\"the AP made a mistake; they said some people booed at a speech but really nobody did\"\", it seems very unlikely that it will ever have historical significance. (You characterize the AP's error as a \"\"clear falsification\"\", but I see no evidence of malicious intent by the AP, and anyway it's still not an encyclopedia's job to document falsehoods by the AP. If the AP has a history or pattern of such falsehoods, and it is well-documented by other unbiased sources, then we can make a note of it in Associated Press.) If the term \"\"no-boo\"\" becomes well established\u2014which, again, we will not know for months or years\u2014then perhaps it will be appropriate for us to record this news story as the origin of the term. Certainly, Wikipedia has articles on other recent news stories. However, most are stories of definite historical signficance, and those that are not should also be deleted.\nWikipedia wants articles on items that are currently in the news, yes. In this case there are many things related to the story that people might want to look up. If we didn't already have them, we could add articles on George W. Bush, William J. Clinton, West Allis, Wisconsin, booing, the Associated Press, the White House, the Republican National Convention, New York, etc. But this \"\"No-boo Affair\"\" is not an encyclopedic topic in the news; it is a breaking news story.\n\nIt is important to understand that an encyclopedia is not simply a gathering of assorted facts, but rather a secondary source that compiles significant pieces of human knowledge that have already been well-established by other sources. There are many places on the internet and offline where you can disseminate facts and opinions about this event, but Wikipedia is not one of them. \u2014 18:08, 15 Sep 2004 (UTC)\"", - "id": "941" - }, - "942": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"OPPOSED Rod, pole, and perch are used interchangeably (though in practice rod is most often used) in measuring the 16-1/2-foot *length*, but for area the use of \"\"perch\"\" is almost exclusive, probably stemming from the perch also historically representing units, if I recall correctly that defined both Scots and Irish miles and acres, whereas this didn't apply necessarily to pole, and rod, pretty certain the pole never referred to Irish and Scots units. \n\n\"", - "id": "942" - }, - "943": { - "label": false, - "text": "Plagerism \nThis entry is almost entirely taken from []. It is copyrighted. Please fix the immediately before action is taken.", - "id": "943" - }, - "944": { - "label": false, - "text": "Dwarves ahve human blood what?! \n\nWhat is the scource of the comment at the end of dragon biology about half-dragons being abominations? Horrific Grammar aside it makes no sence. 20:45, 19 June 2006 (BST)", - "id": "944" - }, - "945": { - "label": false, - "text": "Hoboken Terminal \n\nHey, could you double check your diagram at Hoboken Terminal. It needs fixing.", - "id": "945" - }, - "946": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"}}\nIt's been 24 hours, please unblock this IP immediately because Wikipedia \"\"blocking policy\"\" says \"\"incidents of disruptive behavior typically result in 24 hour blocks\"\" not week long blocks. This is the first time block. The blocking policy says that blocking can occur under \"\"disruptive behavior\"\" for \"\"gross incivility\"\". As Peregrine981 wrote above the incident is clearly not \"\"gross incivility\"\". The main reason is the blocker went over the alotted 24 hours for a first time block.\n\nWikipedia Blocking Policy:\nUnder \"\"duration of blocks\"\" see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:BP \n172.250.31.151 \"", - "id": "946" - }, - "947": { - "label": false, - "text": "She was already sworn in. I'm pretty sure you misunderstood as she was supposed to be sworn in at 12:30 p.m. today, but was delayed a little bit by Rudd's address and Gillard's press conference. -", - "id": "947" - }, - "948": { - "label": false, - "text": "REDIRECT Talk:Carlos Johnson (musician)", - "id": "948" - }, - "949": { - "label": false, - "text": "Thanks. Sorry, I missed the fact that it was produced by Al-Jazeera. Ignore me. -)", - "id": "949" - }, - "950": { - "label": false, - "text": "Scarab bug tracking software \n\nYesterday I was reading through Comparison of issue tracking systems and followed the link Scarab.\n\nThis lead to a disambiguation page. The page listed:\nAn open source bugtracker software\n\nThis text and the links contained are extremely confusing. The disambiguation template clearly states that if an internal link (such as the one from the comparison) leads to this disambiguation page, you should change that incoming link it to point to the appropriate article. Since the article did not exist and since the item in the list for the application was confusing, I decided to create a Scarab Bug Tracking page.\n\nTo make things as seamless as possible, I quickly copied the text from the old item into the new article, intending to improve the article as soon as it was created. Before I could make my modifications, you changed the content to link back to the list or something similarly stupid. (I would go back and read exactly what you changed it to, but you deleted the page, so I can\u2019t check the history)\n\nAfter I reverted your changes and then made some minor changes to the content, I put the page up for move proposal to Scarab (software) to be more consistent with pages that are from disambiguation pages.\n\nThis morning I came back to the page to check if it had moved, but it was gone! I assumed that maybe it was just moved and that the old page no longer existed. I poked around the Move proposal list, and the disambiguation page that I had originally edited (Still in that state) and could no longer find the page.\n\nAs a person unfamiliar with all Wikipedia bullshit politics and confusing processes, it took me a while to figure out exactly what happened to the page I had created less than 24 hours ago. Finally I found it, the person who originally ruined my short article after less than ONE MINUTE of my edit, - you -, deleted it!\n\nIn your comments, you did not explain the reason for deletion, you only sited \u201cA3\u201d. To anyone but a Wikipedia user extremely familiar with deletion, this would be meaningless. An \u201carticle too short\u201d would have been much better. After digging around a lot, I found that it was a reference to the third reason an _A_rticle could be deleted. Hence, the A3. You should AT LEAST link to that so people that aren\u2019t familiar with Wikipedia jargon can figure out what that means without searching through piles and piles of horribly disorganized Wikipedia-politics-ridden pages.\n\nConsidering that the content I posted stated that it was a stub, the time it takes to delete an article, and the relative \u2018freshness\u2019 of the page, it makes you look like a deleting troll. If you thought that the page was clearly grounds for deletion, you should have put that inside the article or something and let it stand for a good 48 hours before finalizing the deletion.\n\nI agree that Wikipedia should not be laden with content-free articles, but having cyclic links from the disambiguation page, to the bug tracking software page, and back is worse. If there is no article to link to, there should be no link.\n\nThe only things that you achieved by deleting the page is: made yourself stand out as a stereotypical Wikipedia troll/nazi/zealot, put off a Wikipedia contributor from continuing to improve the quality of Wikipedia, wasted a lot of my time to investigate what the hell happened to the page I created, and broke at least two internal links.\n\nYou violated the spirit of Wikipedia and smashed what little hope I still had for the Wikipedia community. Congratulations, asshole.\n\nPS: You can clean up the mess you created and the one that I was trying to clean up before.", - "id": "950" - }, - "951": { - "label": false, - "text": "I'm woefully short of enough time to do justice to the request, but if no one else volunteers, (or even if they do), I'll be happy to help, with the understanding that I can't promise timely responses. One other warning, if Jeremiestrother agrees that I can try to be a menotr, I will try to encourage him to spend some time at Requests for feedback, which needs all kinds of help, including copy edit help. (I'll xpost at JS talk.)", - "id": "951" - }, - "952": { - "label": false, - "text": "Tesla was a Serb, born in Croatia. The article is not objective, and I think objectivity is important. One harmless example of that is presenting banknote of Serbia with his image and not presenting the croatian one. Apparently this wiki page is edited by serbian wiki page, and that's why it's not objective. I suggest that the page should be edited by another wiki project. That's how we will stop counting Tesla's blood cells and manipulating with the history. Give Tesla in the hands of neutral party. Thanks.", - "id": "952" - }, - "953": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\n\n Abiogenic origin \n\n I see a discussion tag on this section, but no discussion. I agree that the section lends undue weight to this idea for such an overview article as this. I suggest keeping the first paragraph of the subsection and adding a simplified version of the first sentence of the second to the end of it, viz, \"\"The abiogenic origin hypothesis has little support among modern petroleum geologists.[25]\"\" Are there any objections to this plan? \"", - "id": "953" - }, - "954": { - "label": false, - "text": "Users using sockpuppets in this discussion \n\nNote that user nightscream is soliciting sockpuppets of Toure Neblett to join this discussion:\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Halaqah#Hi_Halaqah.\nThis isn't surprising considering nightscream's slimy debating tactics and ad hominem smears. \nIt looks like the reality is that there are _only_ one or two actual people opposed to teh inclusion of the last name and the rest are their sockpuppets. (Though I guess it demonstrates that Nightscream is _not_ one of Toure's own sockpuppets!)\n(FYI I am not using a user name in this simply to make it clear I am not a sockpuppet)", - "id": "954" - }, - "955": { - "label": false, - "text": "Oh, if you still want to make a Federal case, I've opened a discussion on the talk page, as you should have done instead of deleting a sourced statement in its entirety.", - "id": "955" - }, - "956": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\n\nIssues\nOnefortyone, the reason why I removed your edits, because they have following problems:-\n\nIt is Graceland that is 2nd most visited place in the USA., , , Not Biltmore Estate.\n\"\"The d\u00e9cor throughout the house has often been criticized\"\" is incorrect, it has not been criticized by anyone. Then you put up the quotes of Albert Goldman, a fringe theorist on Elvis Presley, and added them under Graceland#Basement, which is irrelevant.\nThose \"\"conflicting reports\"\" about his death have no relevance on this article, especially when they are disputed or rejected enough times.\n This is why this kind of content misleads and should be removed. I don't see any consensus for adding it on archives or previous discussion either. \"", - "id": "956" - }, - "957": { - "label": false, - "text": "I agree. Sources need to be cited too. (talk \u2022 contribs)", - "id": "957" - }, - "958": { - "label": false, - "text": "\":Totally worth it -D YO \ud83d\ude1c \n\n\"", - "id": "958" - }, - "959": { - "label": false, - "text": "This is not true. Any relationship between the Tibetans and the Qiang is speculative at best. Christopher I. Beckwith treats this question in detail in his PhD dissertation, a reference can be found on his Wikipedia page.", - "id": "959" - }, - "960": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\n\nYes, I do realize a lot of people made contributions to the article when I approached it. This is why I made a lot of effort to get other opinions on the rewrite and what the article should cover. See Talk:Sex#Rewrite of article, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Biology#Sex, and Wikipedia talk:Version_1.0 Editorial Team/Core topics#Sex. No secret has been made of this rewrite\u2014you can see how difficult it has been to get feedback. This article obviously had no \"\"steward\"\", as you so aptly describe on your userpage. I chose to become that steward when I proposed and made the rewrite. I would eventually like to take this core article to FA and it's been difficult to get any feedback.\nPerhaps you didn't realize it, but a \"\"see also\"\" section is deprecated, material should be covered within the body of the article. This came up during the Genetics FAC. I'm sorry your link got removed; I thought I had covered everything in the article. As I noted on the talk page, I think the article should have a top level section on evolution and I think this link could eventually go in there.\nI like you. I'm surprised, hurt, and disappointed that you're so quick to be angry with me. In my past experience (and up to now with the Sex article), I've been too hesitant to throw away old material and too slow to rewrite. Because I got no response to my proposal, and because the article was so poorly written, I went ahead and did it. Wikipedia encourages us to be bold. , who works on Gender, seemed happy with it. \u2709 \u270d \"", - "id": "960" - }, - "961": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"| style=\"\"width: 50px\"\" | \n| Notice to administrators\n\nThis IP address is registered to Deutsche Post Telekom AG and used by a very large number of people in Germany, including many, many established users. Use extreme caution when blocking this IP. \nIf a user is requesting that you release an autoblock of this IP address, remove the autoblock as soon as possible, as it will affect scores of legitimate users. \n|}\n\n\"", - "id": "961" - }, - "962": { - "label": false, - "text": "CSB question\nHi, Verno. ) There's a question about CSB at my talk page, here. Do you know the answer to this one? Or should I ask Coren? (talk)", - "id": "962" - }, - "963": { - "label": false, - "text": "now please dont oppose my image of jatt sikhs during a rally which has been clicked by my personal cameraman!", - "id": "963" - }, - "964": { - "label": false, - "text": "The contributions for St johns from", - "id": "964" - }, - "965": { - "label": false, - "text": "Oh and I just like to add, the people that use this term is a group of 20,000 people on the west coast. Just because you haven't heard it before, doesn't mean it isn't a term. Unlike what you think, your not the center of the universe.", - "id": "965" - }, - "966": { - "label": false, - "text": "New sandbox comment at your horror sandbox discussion page: Hope that's what you were looking for.", - "id": "966" - }, - "967": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\n\n WP:FILM coordinator \n\nHey, I saw your message concerning the upcoming elections for WP:FILM concerning the project coordinators and that you might be adding more. I'm a bit confused concerning the scope of their responsibilities. Is it largely updating , reviewing articles, and aiding in the establishment of task forces (at least as far as I can see)? Do coordinators generally specialize in various areas (i.e. one handles task forces, others reviewing, or a combination of any such duties)? If so, I was wondering whether I could specialize as a coordinator for featured lists. I rank second in terms of total featured lists made among all Wikipedians, and I have a very good grasp of what is required for FL status. If I was elected, I probably would work towards encouraging featured lists under WP:FILM's scope, and there certainly are a host of lists that could be pushed up to FL status with a coordinated effort. That said, I understand that I'm relatively new to the film project, and that there might be more suitable candidates who are more familiar with the project. Just curious as to your thoughts on the matter. Cheers, (converse) \"", - "id": "967" - }, - "968": { - "label": false, - "text": "Because the vast majority of people who hear it probably know it from the book. This is mostly notable to modern audiences solely because of The Catcher in the Rye.", - "id": "968" - }, - "969": { - "label": false, - "text": "Hey, can you be more clear, in what sense have I eveded my block? If I have done any error, it has not been intentional, since I am new to wikipedia, and it may be for lack of experience. Is this the welcome you give to the new users? \nI invite you to see the editing history of Vlore and relative discussion, where my arguments are beeing totally ignored by greek users like Tsourkpk", - "id": "969" - }, - "970": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\n\n Trying to measure the number of cafes \n\nThis is one of those places where I am so frustrated by Wikipedia's ban on original research. The article has the absurdly low \"\"at least six cafes on the Ave or its alleys\"\". I don't know where that number comes from, nor what they consider a \"\"cafe\"\", but it seems to me that well within any reasonable definition, the scene includes:\n Solstice\n Cafe Zoe\n The original Allegro (on an alley parallel to the Ave); arguably, its second location in the College Inn also counts\n The Ugly Mug (half block off)\n The Cafe at the corner of 42nd that used to be the Roma, but I can't recall its new name\n Sureshot\n The Continental\n Caffe Apassionato\n WOW Bubble Tea\n Shinka Tea Company\n Yunnie Bubble Tea\n Pochi Tea\n Gingko Tea House\n Tully's \n Starbucks\n Wannabee (one block off)\n Still Life on the Ave (at the Grand Illusion); technically, the entrance is around the corner, but it is clearly effectively on the Ave.\n\nThis doesn't even count hangouts that are mainly bars or restaurants or takeout food joints, nor does it count things like U. Bookstore and Bulldog News, both of which have busy espresso operations, nor does it count ice cream stands. And I'm sure I'm missing something, this is all just offhand. - | Talk \"", - "id": "970" - }, - "971": { - "label": false, - "text": "I think that notice is aimed more at discouraging changing of the wording in a way that the intended meaning is changed as a result, rather than correcting errors. What you did was fine, so I don't consider it a big issue whatsoever. ;) Thanks again.", - "id": "971" - }, - "972": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\n\n Recent sanctions via ARE \n\nNormally I'm content to let civility infractions fall by the wayside, as you may have seen. But due to an escalating series of enforcement attempts against me, with the result that I am on a \"\"last and final\"\" civility warning before real sanctions ensue, I would like to point out that in his very first interaction with me since the ARE case closed, (talk) (contribs) \"", - "id": "972" - }, - "973": { - "label": false, - "text": "\" \nThe article meets notability guidelines, which I will explain to him shortly. If there's no open period for discussion, then the judgment of notability is by fiat rather than an open process. It's elitist, and it drives away contributors in favor of anti-social nerds. And you meant \"\"too fast.\"\" I edited it for you. ~~~~\n\"", - "id": "973" - }, - "974": { - "label": false, - "text": "ill get my solicitor to contact you.\nYour insane", - "id": "974" - }, - "975": { - "label": false, - "text": "Agreed, she is as American as apple pie.", - "id": "975" - }, - "976": { - "label": false, - "text": "If this were a pop culture blog, would it be relevant to have a section about somebody's guest post on Lady Gaga? IF so, what would you write then?", - "id": "976" - }, - "977": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\n\n errors \n\nWindows 2000 Professional have many errors. I know, because I has Windows 2000 Professional in my computer, and... My cousin spoke me, someone worked a paper on www pages, but suddenly he overhear odd voice, and this a overheear voice spoken: \"\"You turn off a www pages, else you never turn off it's computer\"\". It's error in a translation adress, and many errors in protected. Alden(Sharon boyfriend) or talk \"", - "id": "977" - }, - "978": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\n\n Well, I have added an \"\"Example\"\" section, which may give some people some intuition about, what Dembski means. The example doesn't come around all corners of Dembski's theory, but it does touch upon spme of them -)\n You are free to edit or delete that section as you see fit; I just thought that it might clear up some of the confusion about, what Dembski is trying to say. It's of course only my personal interpretation of Dembski.\n \"", - "id": "978" - }, - "979": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\n\nLordkazan, I am currently looking for suitable citations. But still, I feel my original point was intentionally overlooked. You see, recently, I edited a German article concerning a Neonazi brand name (de:Consdaple). In that article, I inserted totally \"\"biased\"\" ridiculing phrases, because I felt that in Germany, it is always better to decidedly distance yourself from Nazism (and because I am rather convinced of my eloquence in German, although I am certainly not as godlike at it as Avi is with English). Now, with the circumcision article, I have a similar dilemma. But my POV here is, although not more biased than with the Nazi topic, not the Public POV. And that's what I meant in the circumcision discussion: My POV is that there is no NPOV besides the instantaneous total rejection of neonatal genital mutilation, be it in Jewish tradition or whatever. And all that pointing to the respective guidelines by Avi or Jakew won't change that. But the article does not even feature the word \"\"intact\"\", which in itself (the word and its rejection by the pro-biased lobby) is sufficient proof to me that they will never cease to bombard common sense. So alright, I'm Sancho Pansa, but do you really believe in playing the game like this? After all, Jakew doesn't have a problem with the Wikipedia guidelines, because his personal bias is similar to the American/community bias on the topic of circumcision. \"", - "id": "979" - }, - "980": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. \u00a0\u2014 talk \"", - "id": "980" - }, - "981": { - "label": false, - "text": "This was in a discussion on WP:ANI where the matter was being discussed with numerous Admins (some of whom had threatened to block the abusive MorelMwilliams for NPA). On an Admin Notice board WP:Reformed does not apply, and I can speak freely especially when I am the accused in a false case Check-User demand on WP:ANI brought by a previously confirmed sockmaster who admitted right away to Admin:GiantSnowman he had no basis to call me a sock. It is relevant Admin:Audacity did not contribute in that WP:ANI.", - "id": "981" - }, - "982": { - "label": false, - "text": "7 July 2005 21:06 (UTC)", - "id": "982" - }, - "983": { - "label": false, - "text": "Merge\nThere is no good reason for a short orphan article on Fullerenes in popular culture to exist. It would hardly overwhelm this page to add it.", - "id": "983" - }, - "984": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\n\nSure, here: No personal attacks, Don't misrepresent other people. As I said, you're entitled to your opinions, but not your own facts. Whether I'm qualified or not to make \"\"philosophical arguments\"\" is not for you to say. Nor is it for us to say who can edit what or how. There is no policy against arguing over or editing topics on which one has no knowledge whatsoever. In fact, apparently many do. \"", - "id": "984" - }, - "985": { - "label": false, - "text": "Which article are you talking about exactly?", - "id": "985" - }, - "986": { - "label": false, - "text": "I don't the issue is personal. Sia has his opinion, I have mine and you have yours. What is important is to bring actual sources for your POV. The issue can continue on the relevant talk page, so I'll stop here.", - "id": "986" - }, - "987": { - "label": false, - "text": "Suburban Express Conventional Media Sources \n\nHere are some conventional-media sources which are potentially useful for editors working on the Suburban Express article:\n\nDaily Herald\n\nDaily Herald Release: http://www.toeppen.com/daily-herald-release.pdf\nDaily Herald Article re: Fare Wars http://www.toeppen.com/daily-herald-fare-wars-toeppen.pdf\nDaily Herald Article re: University of Iowa Service http://www.toeppen.com/daily-herald-uiowa-se.pdf\n\nNews-Gazette\n\nNews-Gazette release: http://www.toeppen.com/gazette-release.pdf\nNews-Gazette article re: Go Suburban - leave the driving to the entrepreneur: http://www.toeppen.com/oldarticles/1990_0408_news-gazette_article.pdf\n\nDaily Illini\n\nDaily Illini release: http://www.toeppen.com/di-release.pdf\nDaily Illini article re: New cut-rate bus service: http://www.toeppen.com/oldarticles/1984_0128_new_cut-rate_bus_service.pdf\nDaily Illini article re: Illini Union Board budget matters - Greyhound commissions down by $15k (Translates to $150k sales decrease) http://www.toeppen.com/oldarticles/1984_IUB_budget_impact.pdf\nDaily Illini article re: Greyhound Predatory Pricing: http://www.toeppen.com/oldarticles/1985_0216_greyhound_predatory_pricing.pdf\nDaily Illini article re: Suburban Express using novel method to pursue cheaters: http://www.toeppen.com/oldarticles/1996_0117_bad_checks.pdf\nDaily Illini letter to editor re: Bad checks article: http://www.toeppen.com/oldarticles/1996_0118_di_letter_to_editor_re_badcheck_article.pdf\nDaily Illini article re: Students who thought they could do better... http://www.toeppen.com/oldarticles/2000_0823_6th_Wave_Opens.pdf\nDaily Illini article re: ...but who arguably failed: http://www.toeppen.com/oldarticles/2000_1030_Sixth_Wave_Screws_Up.pdf\n\nPerhaps an editor will post these in the Talk section of the Suburban Express article.", - "id": "987" - }, - "988": { - "label": false, - "text": "1:55, 20 March 2006 (UTC)", - "id": "988" - }, - "989": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\n\n Blocked \n\nYou have been temporarily blocked from editing because of your disruptive edits. You are invited to contribute in a constructive manner as soon as the block expires. // (Cleared to land) \"", - "id": "989" - }, - "990": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\n\nAddendum: please stop changing the article because you want it to say what you \"\"want\"\" to believe, not what actually is proven by historians. I know it must be hard if you have invested your life in such a belief, and that in no way negates the ideal that you hold dear, but we need to realize fact from fiction and not fight the truth. Read the works I mentioned above, and if you still disagree, well, then you are actively deluding yourself, but look at some of the reference works therein (especially Japanese works) and further edify yourself. I am begging you.\"", - "id": "990" - }, - "991": { - "label": false, - "text": "The language of the source does not matter. You can add it in the same as any other source. One of the additional parameters you can use is; | language = So add that to the source with the language name. \u00a0fan", - "id": "991" - }, - "992": { - "label": false, - "text": "Aug 2007 \n You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors.", - "id": "992" - }, - "993": { - "label": false, - "text": "\".\nIt might be informative, but it is not notable (WP:N). Just having external links, or by extension, existing, doesn't mean it has reliable sources (WP:IRS). If you can find reliable sources (New York Times, BBC, CNN, Fox News, and a lot of other similar news organizations. A lot of things fall under this category.) this article would be notable. talk \"", - "id": "993" - }, - "994": { - "label": false, - "text": "Hello friend \n\nJust to tell you that I cannot tolerate wrong information on wikipedia. \nYou guys have to give all aspects of a information, be it good, bad, acceptable, unacceptable, or controversial, without hiding anything to make the information complete. Wikipedia is the information people trust upon, so it implies that has to be 100% true. Be bold, that is how you can bring a change, you are in the position to do just that. \nOne who fears, has a very good reason, that he cannot face the truth.", - "id": "994" - }, - "995": { - "label": false, - "text": "the edit difference here http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Alstom&action;=historysubmit&diff;=405398192&oldid;=405397279", - "id": "995" - }, - "996": { - "label": false, - "text": "That's my point. I looked for false positives or any feature that would distinguish these accounts, and there was none to be found. The unpleasant situation is that we had a user with a history of exactly this sort of problem with a set of circumstances, reported by users in good standing, that exactly matched sock puppetry. I had to make a difficult judgment call per all the available information, and the conclusion was a finding of sock puppetry. I have invited checkusers, and others, to review the report. Everything is available for inspection and comment. Talk", - "id": "996" - }, - "997": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\n\nHouse music article\nI think the article needs work. For example, I think \"\"U.S. late 1980s - 1990s\"\" should after \"\"Detroit sound.\"\" \"\"UK 1990s\"\" should after \"\"U.S. late 1980s - 1990s.\"\" What do you think? \"", - "id": "997" - }, - "998": { - "label": false, - "text": "No, 1 image as in the Air Lingus one mentioned directly above. -", - "id": "998" - }, - "999": { - "label": false, - "text": "\" User:206.255.13.8\n\nI like mine better. The Aboriginal flag does not occupy the canton, it occupies the left-hand side of the flag. The so-called \"\"rules of vexillollogy\"\" (or whatever) have no standing.\"", - "id": "999" - }, - "1000": { - "label": false, - "text": "\":: I made no mistake. And you deleted History section on purpose. What you put in population section has nothing to with Ordu's population. Not to mention, it's not \"\"well-sourced\"\" when you use an Armenian poet for a source on an Armenian claim. That is not WPlike and you know it. Give up the act. Read the discussion and stop reverting like you own the place. \n\n\"", - "id": "1000" - }, - "1001": { - "label": false, - "text": "I don't care about that exact phrase being used one way or the other, but the point is to emphasize that it was an event that shaped the history of the region in a major way, even to this day.", - "id": "1001" - }, - "1002": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\n\n \n\n Meep!\u2191 has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding , or to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing! \"", - "id": "1002" - }, - "1003": { - "label": false, - "text": "You are repeating yourself and that is rather tiresome. Your comments have been noted and are now being ignored (drivel).", - "id": "1003" - }, - "1004": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\n\nResponse to your email\nDear Mr. Lawrence or Mr. Ramirez or whoever you may be:\n\nThank you for your email, but I prefer to keep Wikipedia business on Wikipedia, not in private communication, so I will respond here.\n\nYour email to me requesting your IP address be unblocked failed to instill any trust. You claim to be one person (Lawrence), yet you send me email from an address that clearly belongs to another (Ramirez)? Are all accounts at your organization as compromised as your Wikipedia account has been?\n\nYou state \"\"It is not possible for me to set up another account on another IP address because this is my IP address.\"\" No, it is not your IP address. It belongs to your organization. And your organization has lost the trust of the Wikipedia community, with its history of promotional edits and multiple people accessing the same account. Therefore, not just this account, but your organization (at least one particular IP address), is blocked.\n\nYou were instructed above to refer to WP:COMPROMISED for information on how to proceed. Please do so. If you wish to create a new account, you can do so from home or from any number of internet access locations (coffee shops or what not) available in your area. If you do so, you should clearly disclose your conflict of interest and prior accounts you have used on your user page.\n\nSorry, but I will not unblock this account or this IP address. If you wish to contest this block, you are welcome to post another unblock request with your new rationale on here on this talk page. ~ \"", - "id": "1004" - }, - "1005": { - "label": false, - "text": "NOW ITS YOUR TURN YOU SHOULD OF MINED UR OWN BUSSINESS \n\nHELP IM GOING TO KILL MYSLF", - "id": "1005" - }, - "1006": { - "label": false, - "text": "Ohconfucius has a perosnal vendete started against me and has begun to vandalize anything i have worked on \n\nOhconfucius has a perosnal vendete started against me and has begun to vandalize anything i have worked on\n as in here http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Deaths_of_Lawrence_and_Glenna_Shapiro&action;=history68.231.15.56", - "id": "1006" - }, - "1007": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\n\nLanguage and Mind-set of a Popular 1950s Musical\n\nI have removed the \"\"Language and Mindset...\"\" section of the article. The whole section is *very* subjective, depending entirely on your point of view, and could be applied to plenty of films from that era. Further, none of the information there was cited. I am posting the section here in its entirety for reference. \n\nLanguage and Mind-set of a Popular 1950s Musical\n\nSome parts of the film might be considered racy or questionable now, though a recent viewer can place it in the mindset of 1956: Crosby\u2019s character sings a love song to an eleven-year-old girl (his ex-wife\u2019s younger sister who still has quite a crush on him); the father of the bride discusses the attractiveness of his daughter's body (while upbraiding her for having no compassion, as most characters in the movie have already or soon will); and several cases of real and imagined extramarital sex (separated from the movie-going masseswho might not at that time be participating in such exercisesby all characters being part of, or by necessity having to interact with the Newport upper class). When Tracy Lord (played by Kelly) awakens hungover on her wedding day, she doesn\u2019t at first remember anything about her previous night\u2019s drunken carousing, but comes to believe she \u201cmade love\u201d with Mike the reporter (played by Sinatra) and discusses it at length with her ex-husband Dexter (played by Crosby). At the time, of course, \"\"making love\"\" was generally understood in a more amorous than sexual sense. Being a romantic comedy, \u201cHigh Society\u201d plays all of this for laughs while cheering for the real loves to uncover themselves by the end of the last reel.\n\nThere are also some very interesting issues of class in the movie, as Kittridge, the up-and-coming coal magnate (and fiance to the current mine owner\u2019s daughter), is described as having worked his way up from being a miner, and clearly is flummoxed by the confusing interactions of those born into the upper class, as is Sinatra's journalist character.\n\n\"", - "id": "1007" - }, - "1008": { - "label": false, - "text": "Gold bullion \n\nis there any credence given to the assertion that the term bullion, as in Gold bullion, derives from his name? __", - "id": "1008" - }, - "1009": { - "label": false, - "text": "Reference to Lost Numbers\nI believe that the mysterious numbers in Lost really is a cultural reference, as the last number is 42. I find it very hard to believe that this is coincidence. In fact it has been mentioned that the writers have confirmed that their choice for this number is an homage to the HHGTTG. Reference here in the Lostpedia. In particular, here's the interview it was mentioned in.", - "id": "1009" - }, - "1010": { - "label": false, - "text": "STOP IT!!!!!!!!!! \n\nSTOP DELETING STUFF I AM FIXING I WAS NOT DONE FIXING THE SPRING VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL PAGE!!!!!!!!!", - "id": "1010" - }, - "1011": { - "label": false, - "text": "Notability of Ambridge country club\nA tag has been placed on Ambridge country club, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.\n\nFor guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.", - "id": "1011" - }, - "1012": { - "label": false, - "text": "04:14, Mar 7, 2005 (UTC)", - "id": "1012" - }, - "1013": { - "label": false, - "text": "Last set of coats online. The small crosses on Putscheid and on others actuially did have a pointy ending, but it seems that it wasn't clear enough. Hope, it's better now. Cheers", - "id": "1013" - }, - "1014": { - "label": false, - "text": "Tony Award - Featured Actress \n\nClearly people want the page the way it was before because it's been like that for a very long time and was contested when being made a featured list because the user that did that wasn't listening to what people wanted on the page. At the very least, the list doesn't even have the character names for any of the roles which is unacceptable after me and other users spent tons of time adding them in for people to have an easy way to find this information.", - "id": "1014" - }, - "1015": { - "label": false, - "text": "OK, after some further research, Mawdsley turns out to be incorrect. Please see this and this\u2014both sources agree with the book I used and put the date at April 13. I would appreciate it if you reverted to my version and incorporated non-contradicting bits from Mawdsley into it. Cheers,\u2014\u00a0\u2022\u00a0(yo?);", - "id": "1015" - }, - "1016": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\nNothing wrong with that portrait, but she was queen for 22 years, mostly as an adult. It's great for the section on her childhood. Haven't hade time to look at your English yet and help you with that, if needed. I don't see why you only took this as criticism, question my \"\"goal\"\" and got so grumpy. Of course all your positive input to improve the article is appreciated by everyone, including me. I have tried to do my bit earlier. \"", - "id": "1016" - }, - "1017": { - "label": false, - "text": "Split\nThe article needs to be split into UK Garage (common words for this phenomenon), 2Step and 4x4.", - "id": "1017" - }, - "1018": { - "label": false, - "text": "\"\nI'm guessing you don't understand satire or parody. I have myself supported flat-Earthism in an online debate: it was fun! But to suggest that serious proponets of flat-Earthism are \"\"evolutionists\"\" is ludicrous. And where did you get the notion that the majority of proponents (rather than posters) self-identify as evolutionists anyhow? I see no such summary. \"", - "id": "1018" - }, - "1019": { - "label": false, - "text": "Shugdenpas are systematically attacking \nThought to let you know and alert others to Shugdenpas' organized sectarian marketing campaign on Rime.\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Rime_movement\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rime_movement&action;=history", - "id": "1019" - }, - "1020": { - "label": false, - "text": "I won't do the edits", - "id": "1020" - }, - "1021": { - "label": false, - "text": "Doesn't surprise me. One of the side effects of something like this is lots and lots of unsubstantiated rumors. I feel like we're editing the National Inquirer sometimes. Woohoo!", - "id": "1021" - }, - "1022": { - "label": false, - "text": "Please do not delete websites without knowing what you are doing. This is a big game, its just not world wide yet, i've seen many articles like this on wikipedia, i don't see how ours is diffrent, until then fick dich", - "id": "1022" - }, - "1023": { - "label": false, - "text": "Is this the same as Owasco River Railroad?", - "id": "1023" - }, - "e00ef704e53d445e9628e42758f90a48": { - "label": false, - "text": "Life is nothing at all.", - "id": "e00ef704e53d445e9628e42758f90a48" - }, - "365059ffdd8b4f848b3a5786f3abd051": { - "label": false, - "text": "My jokes reflect exactly zero of my character.", - "id": "365059ffdd8b4f848b3a5786f3abd051" - }, - "7ac4fc2f29a040a48630daaeac47819b": { - "label": false, - "text": "Has bad reviews on Amazon but this clip was funny.", - "id": "7ac4fc2f29a040a48630daaeac47819b" - }, - "08fab8690685434f9c56d5950e2f7cc3": { - "label": false, - "text": "This clip was funny.", - "id": "08fab8690685434f9c56d5950e2f7cc3" - }, - "7793319a0f79415797e530522cc82cab": { - "label": false, - "text": "LaBeouf had tried to bum a smoke from a police officer.", - "id": "7793319a0f79415797e530522cc82cab" - }, - "d960bdd2495a44e0be702e9223163ad9": { - "label": false, - "text": "If Pedro has a donkey, then he beats it.", - "id": "d960bdd2495a44e0be702e9223163ad9" - }, - "7cdd943f5e0b49c48ada3a0535bac1e2": { - "label": false, - "text": "######################################################", - "id": "7cdd943f5e0b49c48ada3a0535bac1e2" - }, - "0cdd66da75a044ef89e799dfb126b36c": { - "label": false, - "text": "LEAKED AUDIO SHOWS GOOGLE CLOUD CEO GIVE A FIERY RALLYING CRY AND CALL OUT DEMEANING COMPETITORS IN AI: 'THE GAME IS NEVER DONE IN THE FIRST MINUTE' (6 MINUTE READ) [ ", - "id": "0cdd66da75a044ef89e799dfb126b36c" - }, - "45192e4651f04436a503acd6cfed81aa": { - "label": false, - "text": "WHY TAKE A BIGGER ROLE FOR NO BUMP IN PAY (4 MINUTE READ) [", - "id": "45192e4651f04436a503acd6cfed81aa" - }, - "633462a4f8c24d07bb59e142eeeb3a17": { - "label": true, - "text": "An I'm a walk up an down the beach like \r\n'Sup bitch? Ha ha ha bitch bitch ooh we're gonna have fun hehehe oh yes\r\n\r\n", - "id": "633462a4f8c24d07bb59e142eeeb3a17" - }, - "4113486160a643c3bc885ebf2716199b": { - "label": true, - "text": "How to pull a fuckin' gun trigger \r\nI said, \"Get the fuck outta here!\" \r\n \r\nNigga wanna get too close, to the utmost \r\nBut I got stacks that'll attack any wack host \r\nIntroducin', yo fuck that nigga's name \r\nMy hip-hop drops on your head like rain \r\n \r\nAnd when it rains it pours \r\n'Cause my rhymes hardcore \r\nThat's why I give you more of the raw \r", - "id": "4113486160a643c3bc885ebf2716199b" - }, - "3d155587398346919a6532b9725cff1c": { - "label": true, - "text": "i got my boy rides right here man \r\nu kno how to rap the boy gone put them fire tracks to ya ass man i swear to\r\ngod man \r\non the real man \r\ni got my nigga supah right here man \r\nif u buyin worth my boy got it man i swear to god man \r\ni got my boy T--T.RED but we call him T.STREETS \r\nWHY?? \r\ncuz if you fuck wit him he gonna get real streets i swear to god man \r", - "id": "3d155587398346919a6532b9725cff1c" - }, - "36b21edcaaca410085356f9b32175e7c": { - "label": true, - "text": "The juggling wicked clowns will come to your \r\nBirthday party, wedding, and barmitzva \r\nAnd cut your back off for a small fee \r\nThe juggla ain't taking no shorts from nobody\" \r\n\"Tweedle-dee and tweedle-doh \r\nLet the fucking bass go\" \r\n[Violent J] \r\nAnd the juggla make it last \r\nDown with 2 Dope and try n' get trashed \r\nMy fellow fucking fellas \r\nSouthwest gangster killas \r", - "id": "36b21edcaaca410085356f9b32175e7c" - }, - "67209e41e66444edb0a26907f08f6892": { - "label": true, - "text": "This is the story of a murderer \r\nA cold blooded killer, a ruthless, harmless, slaughterer \r\nI didn't mean to kill him, listen to me, wait \r\nI was talkin' to a fine ass date, ha ha ha \r\nPhat titties, lookin like pow \r\nAnd she's tellin me to come by right now \r\nOh shit, I jumped in the wagon \r\nNo more laggin', I'm taggin' \r\nThis bitch, dead in the ping hole \r\nMake her lose control \r", - "id": "67209e41e66444edb0a26907f08f6892" - }, - "9d1205ed15b448b38ec219ec06f25e7e": { - "label": true, - "text": "And when I say we won't quit, believe this shit \r\nWhen I talk about a Benz, let you see the 6 \r\nAnd when I'm talkin' to a ho, let you meet my bitch \r\nWhen Puff talk, you niggas take heed to this \r\n \r\n[Repeat 1] \r\n \r\n[Mase] \r\nYo, if you down to act, we came to scrap \r\nWe beef '89, still watch your back \r\nA nigga smack me, I'mma smack 'em back \r", - "id": "9d1205ed15b448b38ec219ec06f25e7e" - } - }, - "version": 15, - "description": "Profane or obscene language" -} \ No newline at end of file