diff --git a/evals/.zeno_cache_aba-mrpc/OUTPUTgpt-3_5-turbo.pickle b/evals/.zeno_cache_aba-mrpc/OUTPUTgpt-3_5-turbo.pickle
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4cfc0ddc6671c24ededd6a93dac87bebfd3ff335
--- /dev/null
+++ b/evals/.zeno_cache_aba-mrpc/OUTPUTgpt-3_5-turbo.pickle
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:b94826626027a8d8e3bdc034caaf27599ce88742e625127a2d633667fda14ba4
+size 52290
diff --git a/evals/.zeno_cache_aba-mrpc/OUTPUTgpt-4.pickle b/evals/.zeno_cache_aba-mrpc/OUTPUTgpt-4.pickle
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9762efc1a0e77415f7d71d8169f079750bf0c9b9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/evals/.zeno_cache_aba-mrpc/OUTPUTgpt-4.pickle
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:226d0ffd9db3b27944257bfaf5469a9a09c0c9ba064bb5a7ec7de2b47e719a4c
+size 25077
diff --git a/evals/.zeno_cache_aba-mrpc/POSTDISTILLcorrectgpt-3_5-turbo.pickle b/evals/.zeno_cache_aba-mrpc/POSTDISTILLcorrectgpt-3_5-turbo.pickle
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..19aa42bd7d18daeacd888382ceca9ae92c7037a6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/evals/.zeno_cache_aba-mrpc/POSTDISTILLcorrectgpt-3_5-turbo.pickle
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:5fc12db94052d018116c91cd34c83edb4576d58237f37fd33db0049a4141b283
+size 4155
diff --git a/evals/.zeno_cache_aba-mrpc/POSTDISTILLcorrectgpt-4.pickle b/evals/.zeno_cache_aba-mrpc/POSTDISTILLcorrectgpt-4.pickle
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d2cebce7882b5ead066f307c4e20d86313aa9198
--- /dev/null
+++ b/evals/.zeno_cache_aba-mrpc/POSTDISTILLcorrectgpt-4.pickle
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:851f90f2cc3b30bd750e0bf4c4477cb98a9044cd87edcf084ada9938e3be9f54
+size 4147
diff --git a/evals/.zeno_cache_emotional-intelligence/folders.pickle b/evals/.zeno_cache_aba-mrpc/folders.pickle
similarity index 100%
rename from evals/.zeno_cache_emotional-intelligence/folders.pickle
rename to evals/.zeno_cache_aba-mrpc/folders.pickle
diff --git a/evals/.zeno_cache_emotional-intelligence/reports.pickle b/evals/.zeno_cache_aba-mrpc/reports.pickle
similarity index 100%
rename from evals/.zeno_cache_emotional-intelligence/reports.pickle
rename to evals/.zeno_cache_aba-mrpc/reports.pickle
diff --git a/evals/.zeno_cache_emotional-intelligence/view.mjs b/evals/.zeno_cache_aba-mrpc/view.mjs
similarity index 100%
rename from evals/.zeno_cache_emotional-intelligence/view.mjs
rename to evals/.zeno_cache_aba-mrpc/view.mjs
diff --git a/evals/.zeno_cache_country-area/OUTPUTgpt-3_5-turbo.pickle b/evals/.zeno_cache_country-area/OUTPUTgpt-3_5-turbo.pickle
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ae5ca9b8cf512872b188f1223bbabc7594a0aa54
--- /dev/null
+++ b/evals/.zeno_cache_country-area/OUTPUTgpt-3_5-turbo.pickle
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:e7867bfcccc692d7fc06078e197febd824e7db2fea681baae4e14fd9339bbe17
+size 5393
diff --git a/evals/.zeno_cache_country-area/OUTPUTgpt-4.pickle b/evals/.zeno_cache_country-area/OUTPUTgpt-4.pickle
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..66ef7c4d3ca715e9eff57a660da053bf9c51ea82
--- /dev/null
+++ b/evals/.zeno_cache_country-area/OUTPUTgpt-4.pickle
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:fe04123c1bd490ed20ab541e6549313d255974a9586cc64bee00f0d3f9a7d62e
+size 5169
diff --git a/evals/.zeno_cache_country-area/POSTDISTILLcorrectgpt-3_5-turbo.pickle b/evals/.zeno_cache_country-area/POSTDISTILLcorrectgpt-3_5-turbo.pickle
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b4b7b42c9acab761bda00915b3ee4d65ed7e77ed
--- /dev/null
+++ b/evals/.zeno_cache_country-area/POSTDISTILLcorrectgpt-3_5-turbo.pickle
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:0033c337ecb6041ed37f1069f9b015049d5f7e105b8d718d767df9a2539bdc23
+size 4125
diff --git a/evals/.zeno_cache_country-area/POSTDISTILLcorrectgpt-4.pickle b/evals/.zeno_cache_country-area/POSTDISTILLcorrectgpt-4.pickle
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1f66e8f37e322d2f1a8b1f69d266b1180fc0e30e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/evals/.zeno_cache_country-area/POSTDISTILLcorrectgpt-4.pickle
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:f1395c3c5a91e8ba3f5449a737950f472b7ce0d01ff53134b62e3467d60ca095
+size 4117
diff --git a/evals/.zeno_cache_country-area/PREDISTILLarea.pickle b/evals/.zeno_cache_country-area/PREDISTILLarea.pickle
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c52b949b01721bf121ee56db7ec4f2c9de323dd4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/evals/.zeno_cache_country-area/PREDISTILLarea.pickle
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:d340208354ce11868f29cc211caa8637e30d3b0db9d85ee27677a47a0150dde9
+size 5885
diff --git a/evals/.zeno_cache_country-area/folders.pickle b/evals/.zeno_cache_country-area/folders.pickle
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6f61606d9f0ce6528f4adfd3ebe8da336629c1a1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/evals/.zeno_cache_country-area/folders.pickle
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:ec0a6ccf9debf1c16781445c4b9106080d00478b0559469336db7c7b7b9711c8
+size 5
diff --git a/evals/.zeno_cache_country-area/reports.pickle b/evals/.zeno_cache_country-area/reports.pickle
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6f61606d9f0ce6528f4adfd3ebe8da336629c1a1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/evals/.zeno_cache_country-area/reports.pickle
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:ec0a6ccf9debf1c16781445c4b9106080d00478b0559469336db7c7b7b9711c8
+size 5
diff --git a/evals/.zeno_cache_country-area/view.mjs b/evals/.zeno_cache_country-area/view.mjs
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a233ab94985094652cc8d8cde2fe6f8ff3f40793
--- /dev/null
+++ b/evals/.zeno_cache_country-area/view.mjs
@@ -0,0 +1,1574 @@
+function noop() { }
+function run(fn) {
+    return fn();
+}
+function blank_object() {
+    return Object.create(null);
+}
+function run_all(fns) {
+    fns.forEach(run);
+}
+function is_function(thing) {
+    return typeof thing === 'function';
+}
+function safe_not_equal(a, b) {
+    return a != a ? b == b : a !== b || ((a && typeof a === 'object') || typeof a === 'function');
+}
+function is_empty(obj) {
+    return Object.keys(obj).length === 0;
+}
+function null_to_empty(value) {
+    return value == null ? '' : value;
+}
+
+// Track which nodes are claimed during hydration. Unclaimed nodes can then be removed from the DOM
+// at the end of hydration without touching the remaining nodes.
+let is_hydrating = false;
+function start_hydrating() {
+    is_hydrating = true;
+}
+function end_hydrating() {
+    is_hydrating = false;
+}
+function upper_bound(low, high, key, value) {
+    // Return first index of value larger than input value in the range [low, high)
+    while (low < high) {
+        const mid = low + ((high - low) >> 1);
+        if (key(mid) <= value) {
+            low = mid + 1;
+        }
+        else {
+            high = mid;
+        }
+    }
+    return low;
+}
+function init_hydrate(target) {
+    if (target.hydrate_init)
+        return;
+    target.hydrate_init = true;
+    // We know that all children have claim_order values since the unclaimed have been detached if target is not <head>
+    let children = target.childNodes;
+    // If target is <head>, there may be children without claim_order
+    if (target.nodeName === 'HEAD') {
+        const myChildren = [];
+        for (let i = 0; i < children.length; i++) {
+            const node = children[i];
+            if (node.claim_order !== undefined) {
+                myChildren.push(node);
+            }
+        }
+        children = myChildren;
+    }
+    /*
+    * Reorder claimed children optimally.
+    * We can reorder claimed children optimally by finding the longest subsequence of
+    * nodes that are already claimed in order and only moving the rest. The longest
+    * subsequence of nodes that are claimed in order can be found by
+    * computing the longest increasing subsequence of .claim_order values.
+    *
+    * This algorithm is optimal in generating the least amount of reorder operations
+    * possible.
+    *
+    * Proof:
+    * We know that, given a set of reordering operations, the nodes that do not move
+    * always form an increasing subsequence, since they do not move among each other
+    * meaning that they must be already ordered among each other. Thus, the maximal
+    * set of nodes that do not move form a longest increasing subsequence.
+    */
+    // Compute longest increasing subsequence
+    // m: subsequence length j => index k of smallest value that ends an increasing subsequence of length j
+    const m = new Int32Array(children.length + 1);
+    // Predecessor indices + 1
+    const p = new Int32Array(children.length);
+    m[0] = -1;
+    let longest = 0;
+    for (let i = 0; i < children.length; i++) {
+        const current = children[i].claim_order;
+        // Find the largest subsequence length such that it ends in a value less than our current value
+        // upper_bound returns first greater value, so we subtract one
+        // with fast path for when we are on the current longest subsequence
+        const seqLen = ((longest > 0 && children[m[longest]].claim_order <= current) ? longest + 1 : upper_bound(1, longest, idx => children[m[idx]].claim_order, current)) - 1;
+        p[i] = m[seqLen] + 1;
+        const newLen = seqLen + 1;
+        // We can guarantee that current is the smallest value. Otherwise, we would have generated a longer sequence.
+        m[newLen] = i;
+        longest = Math.max(newLen, longest);
+    }
+    // The longest increasing subsequence of nodes (initially reversed)
+    const lis = [];
+    // The rest of the nodes, nodes that will be moved
+    const toMove = [];
+    let last = children.length - 1;
+    for (let cur = m[longest] + 1; cur != 0; cur = p[cur - 1]) {
+        lis.push(children[cur - 1]);
+        for (; last >= cur; last--) {
+            toMove.push(children[last]);
+        }
+        last--;
+    }
+    for (; last >= 0; last--) {
+        toMove.push(children[last]);
+    }
+    lis.reverse();
+    // We sort the nodes being moved to guarantee that their insertion order matches the claim order
+    toMove.sort((a, b) => a.claim_order - b.claim_order);
+    // Finally, we move the nodes
+    for (let i = 0, j = 0; i < toMove.length; i++) {
+        while (j < lis.length && toMove[i].claim_order >= lis[j].claim_order) {
+            j++;
+        }
+        const anchor = j < lis.length ? lis[j] : null;
+        target.insertBefore(toMove[i], anchor);
+    }
+}
+function append(target, node) {
+    target.appendChild(node);
+}
+function append_styles(target, style_sheet_id, styles) {
+    const append_styles_to = get_root_for_style(target);
+    if (!append_styles_to.getElementById(style_sheet_id)) {
+        const style = element('style');
+        style.id = style_sheet_id;
+        style.textContent = styles;
+        append_stylesheet(append_styles_to, style);
+    }
+}
+function get_root_for_style(node) {
+    if (!node)
+        return document;
+    const root = node.getRootNode ? node.getRootNode() : node.ownerDocument;
+    if (root && root.host) {
+        return root;
+    }
+    return node.ownerDocument;
+}
+function append_stylesheet(node, style) {
+    append(node.head || node, style);
+    return style.sheet;
+}
+function append_hydration(target, node) {
+    if (is_hydrating) {
+        init_hydrate(target);
+        if ((target.actual_end_child === undefined) || ((target.actual_end_child !== null) && (target.actual_end_child.parentNode !== target))) {
+            target.actual_end_child = target.firstChild;
+        }
+        // Skip nodes of undefined ordering
+        while ((target.actual_end_child !== null) && (target.actual_end_child.claim_order === undefined)) {
+            target.actual_end_child = target.actual_end_child.nextSibling;
+        }
+        if (node !== target.actual_end_child) {
+            // We only insert if the ordering of this node should be modified or the parent node is not target
+            if (node.claim_order !== undefined || node.parentNode !== target) {
+                target.insertBefore(node, target.actual_end_child);
+            }
+        }
+        else {
+            target.actual_end_child = node.nextSibling;
+        }
+    }
+    else if (node.parentNode !== target || node.nextSibling !== null) {
+        target.appendChild(node);
+    }
+}
+function insert_hydration(target, node, anchor) {
+    if (is_hydrating && !anchor) {
+        append_hydration(target, node);
+    }
+    else if (node.parentNode !== target || node.nextSibling != anchor) {
+        target.insertBefore(node, anchor || null);
+    }
+}
+function detach(node) {
+    if (node.parentNode) {
+        node.parentNode.removeChild(node);
+    }
+}
+function destroy_each(iterations, detaching) {
+    for (let i = 0; i < iterations.length; i += 1) {
+        if (iterations[i])
+            iterations[i].d(detaching);
+    }
+}
+function element(name) {
+    return document.createElement(name);
+}
+function svg_element(name) {
+    return document.createElementNS('http://www.w3.org/2000/svg', name);
+}
+function text(data) {
+    return document.createTextNode(data);
+}
+function space() {
+    return text(' ');
+}
+function empty() {
+    return text('');
+}
+function attr(node, attribute, value) {
+    if (value == null)
+        node.removeAttribute(attribute);
+    else if (node.getAttribute(attribute) !== value)
+        node.setAttribute(attribute, value);
+}
+function children(element) {
+    return Array.from(element.childNodes);
+}
+function init_claim_info(nodes) {
+    if (nodes.claim_info === undefined) {
+        nodes.claim_info = { last_index: 0, total_claimed: 0 };
+    }
+}
+function claim_node(nodes, predicate, processNode, createNode, dontUpdateLastIndex = false) {
+    // Try to find nodes in an order such that we lengthen the longest increasing subsequence
+    init_claim_info(nodes);
+    const resultNode = (() => {
+        // We first try to find an element after the previous one
+        for (let i = nodes.claim_info.last_index; i < nodes.length; i++) {
+            const node = nodes[i];
+            if (predicate(node)) {
+                const replacement = processNode(node);
+                if (replacement === undefined) {
+                    nodes.splice(i, 1);
+                }
+                else {
+                    nodes[i] = replacement;
+                }
+                if (!dontUpdateLastIndex) {
+                    nodes.claim_info.last_index = i;
+                }
+                return node;
+            }
+        }
+        // Otherwise, we try to find one before
+        // We iterate in reverse so that we don't go too far back
+        for (let i = nodes.claim_info.last_index - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
+            const node = nodes[i];
+            if (predicate(node)) {
+                const replacement = processNode(node);
+                if (replacement === undefined) {
+                    nodes.splice(i, 1);
+                }
+                else {
+                    nodes[i] = replacement;
+                }
+                if (!dontUpdateLastIndex) {
+                    nodes.claim_info.last_index = i;
+                }
+                else if (replacement === undefined) {
+                    // Since we spliced before the last_index, we decrease it
+                    nodes.claim_info.last_index--;
+                }
+                return node;
+            }
+        }
+        // If we can't find any matching node, we create a new one
+        return createNode();
+    })();
+    resultNode.claim_order = nodes.claim_info.total_claimed;
+    nodes.claim_info.total_claimed += 1;
+    return resultNode;
+}
+function claim_element_base(nodes, name, attributes, create_element) {
+    return claim_node(nodes, (node) => node.nodeName === name, (node) => {
+        const remove = [];
+        for (let j = 0; j < node.attributes.length; j++) {
+            const attribute = node.attributes[j];
+            if (!attributes[attribute.name]) {
+                remove.push(attribute.name);
+            }
+        }
+        remove.forEach(v => node.removeAttribute(v));
+        return undefined;
+    }, () => create_element(name));
+}
+function claim_element(nodes, name, attributes) {
+    return claim_element_base(nodes, name, attributes, element);
+}
+function claim_svg_element(nodes, name, attributes) {
+    return claim_element_base(nodes, name, attributes, svg_element);
+}
+function claim_text(nodes, data) {
+    return claim_node(nodes, (node) => node.nodeType === 3, (node) => {
+        const dataStr = '' + data;
+        if (node.data.startsWith(dataStr)) {
+            if (node.data.length !== dataStr.length) {
+                return node.splitText(dataStr.length);
+            }
+        }
+        else {
+            node.data = dataStr;
+        }
+    }, () => text(data), true // Text nodes should not update last index since it is likely not worth it to eliminate an increasing subsequence of actual elements
+    );
+}
+function claim_space(nodes) {
+    return claim_text(nodes, ' ');
+}
+function set_data(text, data) {
+    data = '' + data;
+    if (text.wholeText !== data)
+        text.data = data;
+}
+
+let current_component;
+function set_current_component(component) {
+    current_component = component;
+}
+
+const dirty_components = [];
+const binding_callbacks = [];
+const render_callbacks = [];
+const flush_callbacks = [];
+const resolved_promise = Promise.resolve();
+let update_scheduled = false;
+function schedule_update() {
+    if (!update_scheduled) {
+        update_scheduled = true;
+        resolved_promise.then(flush);
+    }
+}
+function add_render_callback(fn) {
+    render_callbacks.push(fn);
+}
+// flush() calls callbacks in this order:
+// 1. All beforeUpdate callbacks, in order: parents before children
+// 2. All bind:this callbacks, in reverse order: children before parents.
+// 3. All afterUpdate callbacks, in order: parents before children. EXCEPT
+//    for afterUpdates called during the initial onMount, which are called in
+//    reverse order: children before parents.
+// Since callbacks might update component values, which could trigger another
+// call to flush(), the following steps guard against this:
+// 1. During beforeUpdate, any updated components will be added to the
+//    dirty_components array and will cause a reentrant call to flush(). Because
+//    the flush index is kept outside the function, the reentrant call will pick
+//    up where the earlier call left off and go through all dirty components. The
+//    current_component value is saved and restored so that the reentrant call will
+//    not interfere with the "parent" flush() call.
+// 2. bind:this callbacks cannot trigger new flush() calls.
+// 3. During afterUpdate, any updated components will NOT have their afterUpdate
+//    callback called a second time; the seen_callbacks set, outside the flush()
+//    function, guarantees this behavior.
+const seen_callbacks = new Set();
+let flushidx = 0; // Do *not* move this inside the flush() function
+function flush() {
+    // Do not reenter flush while dirty components are updated, as this can
+    // result in an infinite loop. Instead, let the inner flush handle it.
+    // Reentrancy is ok afterwards for bindings etc.
+    if (flushidx !== 0) {
+        return;
+    }
+    const saved_component = current_component;
+    do {
+        // first, call beforeUpdate functions
+        // and update components
+        try {
+            while (flushidx < dirty_components.length) {
+                const component = dirty_components[flushidx];
+                flushidx++;
+                set_current_component(component);
+                update(component.$$);
+            }
+        }
+        catch (e) {
+            // reset dirty state to not end up in a deadlocked state and then rethrow
+            dirty_components.length = 0;
+            flushidx = 0;
+            throw e;
+        }
+        set_current_component(null);
+        dirty_components.length = 0;
+        flushidx = 0;
+        while (binding_callbacks.length)
+            binding_callbacks.pop()();
+        // then, once components are updated, call
+        // afterUpdate functions. This may cause
+        // subsequent updates...
+        for (let i = 0; i < render_callbacks.length; i += 1) {
+            const callback = render_callbacks[i];
+            if (!seen_callbacks.has(callback)) {
+                // ...so guard against infinite loops
+                seen_callbacks.add(callback);
+                callback();
+            }
+        }
+        render_callbacks.length = 0;
+    } while (dirty_components.length);
+    while (flush_callbacks.length) {
+        flush_callbacks.pop()();
+    }
+    update_scheduled = false;
+    seen_callbacks.clear();
+    set_current_component(saved_component);
+}
+function update($$) {
+    if ($$.fragment !== null) {
+        $$.update();
+        run_all($$.before_update);
+        const dirty = $$.dirty;
+        $$.dirty = [-1];
+        $$.fragment && $$.fragment.p($$.ctx, dirty);
+        $$.after_update.forEach(add_render_callback);
+    }
+}
+const outroing = new Set();
+let outros;
+function group_outros() {
+    outros = {
+        r: 0,
+        c: [],
+        p: outros // parent group
+    };
+}
+function check_outros() {
+    if (!outros.r) {
+        run_all(outros.c);
+    }
+    outros = outros.p;
+}
+function transition_in(block, local) {
+    if (block && block.i) {
+        outroing.delete(block);
+        block.i(local);
+    }
+}
+function transition_out(block, local, detach, callback) {
+    if (block && block.o) {
+        if (outroing.has(block))
+            return;
+        outroing.add(block);
+        outros.c.push(() => {
+            outroing.delete(block);
+            if (callback) {
+                if (detach)
+                    block.d(1);
+                callback();
+            }
+        });
+        block.o(local);
+    }
+    else if (callback) {
+        callback();
+    }
+}
+function create_component(block) {
+    block && block.c();
+}
+function claim_component(block, parent_nodes) {
+    block && block.l(parent_nodes);
+}
+function mount_component(component, target, anchor, customElement) {
+    const { fragment, after_update } = component.$$;
+    fragment && fragment.m(target, anchor);
+    if (!customElement) {
+        // onMount happens before the initial afterUpdate
+        add_render_callback(() => {
+            const new_on_destroy = component.$$.on_mount.map(run).filter(is_function);
+            // if the component was destroyed immediately
+            // it will update the `$$.on_destroy` reference to `null`.
+            // the destructured on_destroy may still reference to the old array
+            if (component.$$.on_destroy) {
+                component.$$.on_destroy.push(...new_on_destroy);
+            }
+            else {
+                // Edge case - component was destroyed immediately,
+                // most likely as a result of a binding initialising
+                run_all(new_on_destroy);
+            }
+            component.$$.on_mount = [];
+        });
+    }
+    after_update.forEach(add_render_callback);
+}
+function destroy_component(component, detaching) {
+    const $$ = component.$$;
+    if ($$.fragment !== null) {
+        run_all($$.on_destroy);
+        $$.fragment && $$.fragment.d(detaching);
+        // TODO null out other refs, including component.$$ (but need to
+        // preserve final state?)
+        $$.on_destroy = $$.fragment = null;
+        $$.ctx = [];
+    }
+}
+function make_dirty(component, i) {
+    if (component.$$.dirty[0] === -1) {
+        dirty_components.push(component);
+        schedule_update();
+        component.$$.dirty.fill(0);
+    }
+    component.$$.dirty[(i / 31) | 0] |= (1 << (i % 31));
+}
+function init(component, options, instance, create_fragment, not_equal, props, append_styles, dirty = [-1]) {
+    const parent_component = current_component;
+    set_current_component(component);
+    const $$ = component.$$ = {
+        fragment: null,
+        ctx: [],
+        // state
+        props,
+        update: noop,
+        not_equal,
+        bound: blank_object(),
+        // lifecycle
+        on_mount: [],
+        on_destroy: [],
+        on_disconnect: [],
+        before_update: [],
+        after_update: [],
+        context: new Map(options.context || (parent_component ? parent_component.$$.context : [])),
+        // everything else
+        callbacks: blank_object(),
+        dirty,
+        skip_bound: false,
+        root: options.target || parent_component.$$.root
+    };
+    append_styles && append_styles($$.root);
+    let ready = false;
+    $$.ctx = instance
+        ? instance(component, options.props || {}, (i, ret, ...rest) => {
+            const value = rest.length ? rest[0] : ret;
+            if ($$.ctx && not_equal($$.ctx[i], $$.ctx[i] = value)) {
+                if (!$$.skip_bound && $$.bound[i])
+                    $$.bound[i](value);
+                if (ready)
+                    make_dirty(component, i);
+            }
+            return ret;
+        })
+        : [];
+    $$.update();
+    ready = true;
+    run_all($$.before_update);
+    // `false` as a special case of no DOM component
+    $$.fragment = create_fragment ? create_fragment($$.ctx) : false;
+    if (options.target) {
+        if (options.hydrate) {
+            start_hydrating();
+            const nodes = children(options.target);
+            // eslint-disable-next-line @typescript-eslint/no-non-null-assertion
+            $$.fragment && $$.fragment.l(nodes);
+            nodes.forEach(detach);
+        }
+        else {
+            // eslint-disable-next-line @typescript-eslint/no-non-null-assertion
+            $$.fragment && $$.fragment.c();
+        }
+        if (options.intro)
+            transition_in(component.$$.fragment);
+        mount_component(component, options.target, options.anchor, options.customElement);
+        end_hydrating();
+        flush();
+    }
+    set_current_component(parent_component);
+}
+/**
+ * Base class for Svelte components. Used when dev=false.
+ */
+class SvelteComponent {
+    $destroy() {
+        destroy_component(this, 1);
+        this.$destroy = noop;
+    }
+    $on(type, callback) {
+        if (!is_function(callback)) {
+            return noop;
+        }
+        const callbacks = (this.$$.callbacks[type] || (this.$$.callbacks[type] = []));
+        callbacks.push(callback);
+        return () => {
+            const index = callbacks.indexOf(callback);
+            if (index !== -1)
+                callbacks.splice(index, 1);
+        };
+    }
+    $set($$props) {
+        if (this.$$set && !is_empty($$props)) {
+            this.$$.skip_bound = true;
+            this.$$set($$props);
+            this.$$.skip_bound = false;
+        }
+    }
+}
+
+/* src/AssistantBlock.svelte generated by Svelte v3.55.1 */
+
+function add_css$3(target) {
+	append_styles(target, "svelte-1e3mbn4", ".model.svelte-1e3mbn4.svelte-1e3mbn4{fill:var(--logo)}.no-model.svelte-1e3mbn4.svelte-1e3mbn4{fill:var(--G3)}.model-border.svelte-1e3mbn4.svelte-1e3mbn4{border:1px solid var(--logo)}.no-model-border.svelte-1e3mbn4.svelte-1e3mbn4{border:1px solid rgba(224, 224, 224, 1)}.box.svelte-1e3mbn4.svelte-1e3mbn4{margin-top:10px;margin-bottom:10px;display:flex;align-items:start}.box.svelte-1e3mbn4 svg.svelte-1e3mbn4{min-width:24px;width:24px;margin-right:10px;margin-top:7px}.chat.svelte-1e3mbn4.svelte-1e3mbn4{border-radius:5px;margin:0px;padding:10px;overflow-wrap:anywhere}");
+}
+
+function create_fragment$3(ctx) {
+	let div;
+	let svg;
+	let path;
+	let svg_class_value;
+	let t0;
+	let p;
+	let t1;
+	let p_class_value;
+
+	return {
+		c() {
+			div = element("div");
+			svg = svg_element("svg");
+			path = svg_element("path");
+			t0 = space();
+			p = element("p");
+			t1 = text(/*input*/ ctx[0]);
+			this.h();
+		},
+		l(nodes) {
+			div = claim_element(nodes, "DIV", { class: true });
+			var div_nodes = children(div);
+			svg = claim_svg_element(div_nodes, "svg", { xmlns: true, viewBox: true, class: true });
+			var svg_nodes = children(svg);
+			path = claim_svg_element(svg_nodes, "path", { d: true });
+			children(path).forEach(detach);
+			svg_nodes.forEach(detach);
+			t0 = claim_space(div_nodes);
+			p = claim_element(div_nodes, "P", { class: true });
+			var p_nodes = children(p);
+			t1 = claim_text(p_nodes, /*input*/ ctx[0]);
+			p_nodes.forEach(detach);
+			div_nodes.forEach(detach);
+			this.h();
+		},
+		h() {
+			attr(path, "d", "M320 0c17.7 0 32 14.3 32 32V96H472c39.8 0 72 32.2 72 72V440c0 39.8-32.2 72-72 72H168c-39.8 0-72-32.2-72-72V168c0-39.8 32.2-72 72-72H288V32c0-17.7 14.3-32 32-32zM208 384c-8.8 0-16 7.2-16 16s7.2 16 16 16h32c8.8 0 16-7.2 16-16s-7.2-16-16-16H208zm96 0c-8.8 0-16 7.2-16 16s7.2 16 16 16h32c8.8 0 16-7.2 16-16s-7.2-16-16-16H304zm96 0c-8.8 0-16 7.2-16 16s7.2 16 16 16h32c8.8 0 16-7.2 16-16s-7.2-16-16-16H400zM264 256a40 40 0 1 0 -80 0 40 40 0 1 0 80 0zm152 40a40 40 0 1 0 0-80 40 40 0 1 0 0 80zM48 224H64V416H48c-26.5 0-48-21.5-48-48V272c0-26.5 21.5-48 48-48zm544 0c26.5 0 48 21.5 48 48v96c0 26.5-21.5 48-48 48H576V224h16z");
+			attr(svg, "xmlns", "http://www.w3.org/2000/svg");
+			attr(svg, "viewBox", "0 0 640 512");
+			attr(svg, "class", svg_class_value = "" + (null_to_empty(/*output*/ ctx[1] ? "model" : "no-model") + " svelte-1e3mbn4"));
+			attr(p, "class", p_class_value = "chat " + (/*output*/ ctx[1] ? 'model-border' : 'no-model-border') + " svelte-1e3mbn4");
+			attr(div, "class", "box svelte-1e3mbn4");
+		},
+		m(target, anchor) {
+			insert_hydration(target, div, anchor);
+			append_hydration(div, svg);
+			append_hydration(svg, path);
+			append_hydration(div, t0);
+			append_hydration(div, p);
+			append_hydration(p, t1);
+		},
+		p(ctx, [dirty]) {
+			if (dirty & /*output*/ 2 && svg_class_value !== (svg_class_value = "" + (null_to_empty(/*output*/ ctx[1] ? "model" : "no-model") + " svelte-1e3mbn4"))) {
+				attr(svg, "class", svg_class_value);
+			}
+
+			if (dirty & /*input*/ 1) set_data(t1, /*input*/ ctx[0]);
+
+			if (dirty & /*output*/ 2 && p_class_value !== (p_class_value = "chat " + (/*output*/ ctx[1] ? 'model-border' : 'no-model-border') + " svelte-1e3mbn4")) {
+				attr(p, "class", p_class_value);
+			}
+		},
+		i: noop,
+		o: noop,
+		d(detaching) {
+			if (detaching) detach(div);
+		}
+	};
+}
+
+function instance$3($$self, $$props, $$invalidate) {
+	let { input } = $$props;
+	let { output = false } = $$props;
+
+	$$self.$$set = $$props => {
+		if ('input' in $$props) $$invalidate(0, input = $$props.input);
+		if ('output' in $$props) $$invalidate(1, output = $$props.output);
+	};
+
+	return [input, output];
+}
+
+class AssistantBlock extends SvelteComponent {
+	constructor(options) {
+		super();
+		init(this, options, instance$3, create_fragment$3, safe_not_equal, { input: 0, output: 1 }, add_css$3);
+	}
+}
+
+/* src/SystemBlock.svelte generated by Svelte v3.55.1 */
+
+function add_css$2(target) {
+	append_styles(target, "svelte-18o0ab2", "p.svelte-18o0ab2{margin:0px}");
+}
+
+function create_fragment$2(ctx) {
+	let p;
+	let b;
+	let t0;
+	let t1;
+	let span;
+	let t2;
+
+	return {
+		c() {
+			p = element("p");
+			b = element("b");
+			t0 = text("System:");
+			t1 = space();
+			span = element("span");
+			t2 = text(/*input*/ ctx[0]);
+			this.h();
+		},
+		l(nodes) {
+			p = claim_element(nodes, "P", { class: true });
+			var p_nodes = children(p);
+			b = claim_element(p_nodes, "B", {});
+			var b_nodes = children(b);
+			t0 = claim_text(b_nodes, "System:");
+			b_nodes.forEach(detach);
+			t1 = claim_space(p_nodes);
+			span = claim_element(p_nodes, "SPAN", {});
+			var span_nodes = children(span);
+			t2 = claim_text(span_nodes, /*input*/ ctx[0]);
+			span_nodes.forEach(detach);
+			p_nodes.forEach(detach);
+			this.h();
+		},
+		h() {
+			attr(p, "class", "svelte-18o0ab2");
+		},
+		m(target, anchor) {
+			insert_hydration(target, p, anchor);
+			append_hydration(p, b);
+			append_hydration(b, t0);
+			append_hydration(p, t1);
+			append_hydration(p, span);
+			append_hydration(span, t2);
+		},
+		p(ctx, [dirty]) {
+			if (dirty & /*input*/ 1) set_data(t2, /*input*/ ctx[0]);
+		},
+		i: noop,
+		o: noop,
+		d(detaching) {
+			if (detaching) detach(p);
+		}
+	};
+}
+
+function instance$2($$self, $$props, $$invalidate) {
+	let { input } = $$props;
+
+	$$self.$$set = $$props => {
+		if ('input' in $$props) $$invalidate(0, input = $$props.input);
+	};
+
+	return [input];
+}
+
+class SystemBlock extends SvelteComponent {
+	constructor(options) {
+		super();
+		init(this, options, instance$2, create_fragment$2, safe_not_equal, { input: 0 }, add_css$2);
+	}
+}
+
+/* src/UserBlock.svelte generated by Svelte v3.55.1 */
+
+function add_css$1(target) {
+	append_styles(target, "svelte-1lys9p1", ".box.svelte-1lys9p1.svelte-1lys9p1{margin-top:10px;margin-bottom:10px;display:flex;align-items:start}.box.svelte-1lys9p1 svg.svelte-1lys9p1{min-width:24px;width:24px;margin-right:10px;margin-top:7px;fill:var(--G3)}.chat.svelte-1lys9p1.svelte-1lys9p1{border:1px solid rgba(224, 224, 224, 1);border-radius:5px;margin:0px;padding:10px;overflow-wrap:anywhere}");
+}
+
+function create_fragment$1(ctx) {
+	let div;
+	let svg;
+	let path;
+	let t0;
+	let p;
+	let t1;
+
+	return {
+		c() {
+			div = element("div");
+			svg = svg_element("svg");
+			path = svg_element("path");
+			t0 = space();
+			p = element("p");
+			t1 = text(/*input*/ ctx[0]);
+			this.h();
+		},
+		l(nodes) {
+			div = claim_element(nodes, "DIV", { class: true });
+			var div_nodes = children(div);
+			svg = claim_svg_element(div_nodes, "svg", { xmlns: true, viewBox: true, class: true });
+			var svg_nodes = children(svg);
+			path = claim_svg_element(svg_nodes, "path", { d: true });
+			children(path).forEach(detach);
+			svg_nodes.forEach(detach);
+			t0 = claim_space(div_nodes);
+			p = claim_element(div_nodes, "P", { class: true });
+			var p_nodes = children(p);
+			t1 = claim_text(p_nodes, /*input*/ ctx[0]);
+			p_nodes.forEach(detach);
+			div_nodes.forEach(detach);
+			this.h();
+		},
+		h() {
+			attr(path, "d", "M224 256A128 128 0 1 0 224 0a128 128 0 1 0 0 256zm-45.7 48C79.8 304 0 383.8 0 482.3C0 498.7 13.3 512 29.7 512H418.3c16.4 0 29.7-13.3 29.7-29.7C448 383.8 368.2 304 269.7 304H178.3z");
+			attr(svg, "xmlns", "http://www.w3.org/2000/svg");
+			attr(svg, "viewBox", "0 0 448 512");
+			attr(svg, "class", "svelte-1lys9p1");
+			attr(p, "class", "chat svelte-1lys9p1");
+			attr(div, "class", "box svelte-1lys9p1");
+		},
+		m(target, anchor) {
+			insert_hydration(target, div, anchor);
+			append_hydration(div, svg);
+			append_hydration(svg, path);
+			append_hydration(div, t0);
+			append_hydration(div, p);
+			append_hydration(p, t1);
+		},
+		p(ctx, [dirty]) {
+			if (dirty & /*input*/ 1) set_data(t1, /*input*/ ctx[0]);
+		},
+		i: noop,
+		o: noop,
+		d(detaching) {
+			if (detaching) detach(div);
+		}
+	};
+}
+
+function instance$1($$self, $$props, $$invalidate) {
+	let { input } = $$props;
+
+	$$self.$$set = $$props => {
+		if ('input' in $$props) $$invalidate(0, input = $$props.input);
+	};
+
+	return [input];
+}
+
+class UserBlock extends SvelteComponent {
+	constructor(options) {
+		super();
+		init(this, options, instance$1, create_fragment$1, safe_not_equal, { input: 0 }, add_css$1);
+	}
+}
+
+/* src/InstanceView.svelte generated by Svelte v3.55.1 */
+
+function add_css(target) {
+	append_styles(target, "svelte-eoma5v", "#container.svelte-eoma5v{border:0.5px solid rgb(224, 224, 224);min-width:350px;border-radius:2px;padding:10px}.label.svelte-eoma5v{margin-right:5px;font-weight:700}p.svelte-eoma5v{margin:5px;overflow-wrap:anywhere}");
+}
+
+function get_each_context(ctx, list, i) {
+	const child_ctx = ctx.slice();
+	child_ctx[6] = list[i];
+	return child_ctx;
+}
+
+// (21:2) {#if entry[dataColumn]}
+function create_if_block_2(ctx) {
+	let current_block_type_index;
+	let if_block;
+	let if_block_anchor;
+	let current;
+	const if_block_creators = [create_if_block_3, create_else_block];
+	const if_blocks = [];
+
+	function select_block_type(ctx, dirty) {
+		if (typeof /*entry*/ ctx[0][/*dataColumn*/ ctx[3]] === "string") return 0;
+		return 1;
+	}
+
+	current_block_type_index = select_block_type(ctx);
+	if_block = if_blocks[current_block_type_index] = if_block_creators[current_block_type_index](ctx);
+
+	return {
+		c() {
+			if_block.c();
+			if_block_anchor = empty();
+		},
+		l(nodes) {
+			if_block.l(nodes);
+			if_block_anchor = empty();
+		},
+		m(target, anchor) {
+			if_blocks[current_block_type_index].m(target, anchor);
+			insert_hydration(target, if_block_anchor, anchor);
+			current = true;
+		},
+		p(ctx, dirty) {
+			let previous_block_index = current_block_type_index;
+			current_block_type_index = select_block_type(ctx);
+
+			if (current_block_type_index === previous_block_index) {
+				if_blocks[current_block_type_index].p(ctx, dirty);
+			} else {
+				group_outros();
+
+				transition_out(if_blocks[previous_block_index], 1, 1, () => {
+					if_blocks[previous_block_index] = null;
+				});
+
+				check_outros();
+				if_block = if_blocks[current_block_type_index];
+
+				if (!if_block) {
+					if_block = if_blocks[current_block_type_index] = if_block_creators[current_block_type_index](ctx);
+					if_block.c();
+				} else {
+					if_block.p(ctx, dirty);
+				}
+
+				transition_in(if_block, 1);
+				if_block.m(if_block_anchor.parentNode, if_block_anchor);
+			}
+		},
+		i(local) {
+			if (current) return;
+			transition_in(if_block);
+			current = true;
+		},
+		o(local) {
+			transition_out(if_block);
+			current = false;
+		},
+		d(detaching) {
+			if_blocks[current_block_type_index].d(detaching);
+			if (detaching) detach(if_block_anchor);
+		}
+	};
+}
+
+// (24:4) {:else}
+function create_else_block(ctx) {
+	let each_1_anchor;
+	let current;
+	let each_value = /*entry*/ ctx[0][/*dataColumn*/ ctx[3]];
+	let each_blocks = [];
+
+	for (let i = 0; i < each_value.length; i += 1) {
+		each_blocks[i] = create_each_block(get_each_context(ctx, each_value, i));
+	}
+
+	const out = i => transition_out(each_blocks[i], 1, 1, () => {
+		each_blocks[i] = null;
+	});
+
+	return {
+		c() {
+			for (let i = 0; i < each_blocks.length; i += 1) {
+				each_blocks[i].c();
+			}
+
+			each_1_anchor = empty();
+		},
+		l(nodes) {
+			for (let i = 0; i < each_blocks.length; i += 1) {
+				each_blocks[i].l(nodes);
+			}
+
+			each_1_anchor = empty();
+		},
+		m(target, anchor) {
+			for (let i = 0; i < each_blocks.length; i += 1) {
+				each_blocks[i].m(target, anchor);
+			}
+
+			insert_hydration(target, each_1_anchor, anchor);
+			current = true;
+		},
+		p(ctx, dirty) {
+			if (dirty & /*entry, dataColumn*/ 9) {
+				each_value = /*entry*/ ctx[0][/*dataColumn*/ ctx[3]];
+				let i;
+
+				for (i = 0; i < each_value.length; i += 1) {
+					const child_ctx = get_each_context(ctx, each_value, i);
+
+					if (each_blocks[i]) {
+						each_blocks[i].p(child_ctx, dirty);
+						transition_in(each_blocks[i], 1);
+					} else {
+						each_blocks[i] = create_each_block(child_ctx);
+						each_blocks[i].c();
+						transition_in(each_blocks[i], 1);
+						each_blocks[i].m(each_1_anchor.parentNode, each_1_anchor);
+					}
+				}
+
+				group_outros();
+
+				for (i = each_value.length; i < each_blocks.length; i += 1) {
+					out(i);
+				}
+
+				check_outros();
+			}
+		},
+		i(local) {
+			if (current) return;
+
+			for (let i = 0; i < each_value.length; i += 1) {
+				transition_in(each_blocks[i]);
+			}
+
+			current = true;
+		},
+		o(local) {
+			each_blocks = each_blocks.filter(Boolean);
+
+			for (let i = 0; i < each_blocks.length; i += 1) {
+				transition_out(each_blocks[i]);
+			}
+
+			current = false;
+		},
+		d(detaching) {
+			destroy_each(each_blocks, detaching);
+			if (detaching) detach(each_1_anchor);
+		}
+	};
+}
+
+// (22:4) {#if typeof entry[dataColumn] === "string"}
+function create_if_block_3(ctx) {
+	let userblock;
+	let current;
+
+	userblock = new UserBlock({
+			props: {
+				input: /*entry*/ ctx[0][/*dataColumn*/ ctx[3]]
+			}
+		});
+
+	return {
+		c() {
+			create_component(userblock.$$.fragment);
+		},
+		l(nodes) {
+			claim_component(userblock.$$.fragment, nodes);
+		},
+		m(target, anchor) {
+			mount_component(userblock, target, anchor);
+			current = true;
+		},
+		p(ctx, dirty) {
+			const userblock_changes = {};
+			if (dirty & /*entry, dataColumn*/ 9) userblock_changes.input = /*entry*/ ctx[0][/*dataColumn*/ ctx[3]];
+			userblock.$set(userblock_changes);
+		},
+		i(local) {
+			if (current) return;
+			transition_in(userblock.$$.fragment, local);
+			current = true;
+		},
+		o(local) {
+			transition_out(userblock.$$.fragment, local);
+			current = false;
+		},
+		d(detaching) {
+			destroy_component(userblock, detaching);
+		}
+	};
+}
+
+// (30:42) 
+function create_if_block_6(ctx) {
+	let userblock;
+	let current;
+
+	userblock = new UserBlock({
+			props: { input: /*item*/ ctx[6]["content"] }
+		});
+
+	return {
+		c() {
+			create_component(userblock.$$.fragment);
+		},
+		l(nodes) {
+			claim_component(userblock.$$.fragment, nodes);
+		},
+		m(target, anchor) {
+			mount_component(userblock, target, anchor);
+			current = true;
+		},
+		p(ctx, dirty) {
+			const userblock_changes = {};
+			if (dirty & /*entry, dataColumn*/ 9) userblock_changes.input = /*item*/ ctx[6]["content"];
+			userblock.$set(userblock_changes);
+		},
+		i(local) {
+			if (current) return;
+			transition_in(userblock.$$.fragment, local);
+			current = true;
+		},
+		o(local) {
+			transition_out(userblock.$$.fragment, local);
+			current = false;
+		},
+		d(detaching) {
+			destroy_component(userblock, detaching);
+		}
+	};
+}
+
+// (28:47) 
+function create_if_block_5(ctx) {
+	let assistantblock;
+	let current;
+
+	assistantblock = new AssistantBlock({
+			props: { input: /*item*/ ctx[6]["content"] }
+		});
+
+	return {
+		c() {
+			create_component(assistantblock.$$.fragment);
+		},
+		l(nodes) {
+			claim_component(assistantblock.$$.fragment, nodes);
+		},
+		m(target, anchor) {
+			mount_component(assistantblock, target, anchor);
+			current = true;
+		},
+		p(ctx, dirty) {
+			const assistantblock_changes = {};
+			if (dirty & /*entry, dataColumn*/ 9) assistantblock_changes.input = /*item*/ ctx[6]["content"];
+			assistantblock.$set(assistantblock_changes);
+		},
+		i(local) {
+			if (current) return;
+			transition_in(assistantblock.$$.fragment, local);
+			current = true;
+		},
+		o(local) {
+			transition_out(assistantblock.$$.fragment, local);
+			current = false;
+		},
+		d(detaching) {
+			destroy_component(assistantblock, detaching);
+		}
+	};
+}
+
+// (26:8) {#if item["role"] === "system"}
+function create_if_block_4(ctx) {
+	let systemblock;
+	let current;
+
+	systemblock = new SystemBlock({
+			props: { input: /*item*/ ctx[6]["content"] }
+		});
+
+	return {
+		c() {
+			create_component(systemblock.$$.fragment);
+		},
+		l(nodes) {
+			claim_component(systemblock.$$.fragment, nodes);
+		},
+		m(target, anchor) {
+			mount_component(systemblock, target, anchor);
+			current = true;
+		},
+		p(ctx, dirty) {
+			const systemblock_changes = {};
+			if (dirty & /*entry, dataColumn*/ 9) systemblock_changes.input = /*item*/ ctx[6]["content"];
+			systemblock.$set(systemblock_changes);
+		},
+		i(local) {
+			if (current) return;
+			transition_in(systemblock.$$.fragment, local);
+			current = true;
+		},
+		o(local) {
+			transition_out(systemblock.$$.fragment, local);
+			current = false;
+		},
+		d(detaching) {
+			destroy_component(systemblock, detaching);
+		}
+	};
+}
+
+// (25:6) {#each entry[dataColumn] as item}
+function create_each_block(ctx) {
+	let current_block_type_index;
+	let if_block;
+	let if_block_anchor;
+	let current;
+	const if_block_creators = [create_if_block_4, create_if_block_5, create_if_block_6];
+	const if_blocks = [];
+
+	function select_block_type_1(ctx, dirty) {
+		if (/*item*/ ctx[6]["role"] === "system") return 0;
+		if (/*item*/ ctx[6]["role"] === "assistant") return 1;
+		if (/*item*/ ctx[6]["role"] === "user") return 2;
+		return -1;
+	}
+
+	if (~(current_block_type_index = select_block_type_1(ctx))) {
+		if_block = if_blocks[current_block_type_index] = if_block_creators[current_block_type_index](ctx);
+	}
+
+	return {
+		c() {
+			if (if_block) if_block.c();
+			if_block_anchor = empty();
+		},
+		l(nodes) {
+			if (if_block) if_block.l(nodes);
+			if_block_anchor = empty();
+		},
+		m(target, anchor) {
+			if (~current_block_type_index) {
+				if_blocks[current_block_type_index].m(target, anchor);
+			}
+
+			insert_hydration(target, if_block_anchor, anchor);
+			current = true;
+		},
+		p(ctx, dirty) {
+			let previous_block_index = current_block_type_index;
+			current_block_type_index = select_block_type_1(ctx);
+
+			if (current_block_type_index === previous_block_index) {
+				if (~current_block_type_index) {
+					if_blocks[current_block_type_index].p(ctx, dirty);
+				}
+			} else {
+				if (if_block) {
+					group_outros();
+
+					transition_out(if_blocks[previous_block_index], 1, 1, () => {
+						if_blocks[previous_block_index] = null;
+					});
+
+					check_outros();
+				}
+
+				if (~current_block_type_index) {
+					if_block = if_blocks[current_block_type_index];
+
+					if (!if_block) {
+						if_block = if_blocks[current_block_type_index] = if_block_creators[current_block_type_index](ctx);
+						if_block.c();
+					} else {
+						if_block.p(ctx, dirty);
+					}
+
+					transition_in(if_block, 1);
+					if_block.m(if_block_anchor.parentNode, if_block_anchor);
+				} else {
+					if_block = null;
+				}
+			}
+		},
+		i(local) {
+			if (current) return;
+			transition_in(if_block);
+			current = true;
+		},
+		o(local) {
+			transition_out(if_block);
+			current = false;
+		},
+		d(detaching) {
+			if (~current_block_type_index) {
+				if_blocks[current_block_type_index].d(detaching);
+			}
+
+			if (detaching) detach(if_block_anchor);
+		}
+	};
+}
+
+// (36:2) {#if entry[modelColumn]}
+function create_if_block_1(ctx) {
+	let assistantblock;
+	let current;
+
+	assistantblock = new AssistantBlock({
+			props: {
+				input: /*entry*/ ctx[0][/*modelColumn*/ ctx[1]],
+				output: true
+			}
+		});
+
+	return {
+		c() {
+			create_component(assistantblock.$$.fragment);
+		},
+		l(nodes) {
+			claim_component(assistantblock.$$.fragment, nodes);
+		},
+		m(target, anchor) {
+			mount_component(assistantblock, target, anchor);
+			current = true;
+		},
+		p(ctx, dirty) {
+			const assistantblock_changes = {};
+			if (dirty & /*entry, modelColumn*/ 3) assistantblock_changes.input = /*entry*/ ctx[0][/*modelColumn*/ ctx[1]];
+			assistantblock.$set(assistantblock_changes);
+		},
+		i(local) {
+			if (current) return;
+			transition_in(assistantblock.$$.fragment, local);
+			current = true;
+		},
+		o(local) {
+			transition_out(assistantblock.$$.fragment, local);
+			current = false;
+		},
+		d(detaching) {
+			destroy_component(assistantblock, detaching);
+		}
+	};
+}
+
+// (39:2) {#if entry[labelColumn]}
+function create_if_block(ctx) {
+	let p;
+	let span;
+	let t0;
+	let t1;
+	let t2_value = /*entry*/ ctx[0][/*labelColumn*/ ctx[2]] + "";
+	let t2;
+
+	return {
+		c() {
+			p = element("p");
+			span = element("span");
+			t0 = text("Expected:");
+			t1 = space();
+			t2 = text(t2_value);
+			this.h();
+		},
+		l(nodes) {
+			p = claim_element(nodes, "P", { class: true });
+			var p_nodes = children(p);
+			span = claim_element(p_nodes, "SPAN", { class: true });
+			var span_nodes = children(span);
+			t0 = claim_text(span_nodes, "Expected:");
+			span_nodes.forEach(detach);
+			t1 = claim_space(p_nodes);
+			t2 = claim_text(p_nodes, t2_value);
+			p_nodes.forEach(detach);
+			this.h();
+		},
+		h() {
+			attr(span, "class", "label svelte-eoma5v");
+			attr(p, "class", "svelte-eoma5v");
+		},
+		m(target, anchor) {
+			insert_hydration(target, p, anchor);
+			append_hydration(p, span);
+			append_hydration(span, t0);
+			append_hydration(p, t1);
+			append_hydration(p, t2);
+		},
+		p(ctx, dirty) {
+			if (dirty & /*entry, labelColumn*/ 5 && t2_value !== (t2_value = /*entry*/ ctx[0][/*labelColumn*/ ctx[2]] + "")) set_data(t2, t2_value);
+		},
+		d(detaching) {
+			if (detaching) detach(p);
+		}
+	};
+}
+
+function create_fragment(ctx) {
+	let div;
+	let t0;
+	let t1;
+	let current;
+	let if_block0 = /*entry*/ ctx[0][/*dataColumn*/ ctx[3]] && create_if_block_2(ctx);
+	let if_block1 = /*entry*/ ctx[0][/*modelColumn*/ ctx[1]] && create_if_block_1(ctx);
+	let if_block2 = /*entry*/ ctx[0][/*labelColumn*/ ctx[2]] && create_if_block(ctx);
+
+	return {
+		c() {
+			div = element("div");
+			if (if_block0) if_block0.c();
+			t0 = space();
+			if (if_block1) if_block1.c();
+			t1 = space();
+			if (if_block2) if_block2.c();
+			this.h();
+		},
+		l(nodes) {
+			div = claim_element(nodes, "DIV", { id: true, class: true });
+			var div_nodes = children(div);
+			if (if_block0) if_block0.l(div_nodes);
+			t0 = claim_space(div_nodes);
+			if (if_block1) if_block1.l(div_nodes);
+			t1 = claim_space(div_nodes);
+			if (if_block2) if_block2.l(div_nodes);
+			div_nodes.forEach(detach);
+			this.h();
+		},
+		h() {
+			attr(div, "id", "container");
+			attr(div, "class", "svelte-eoma5v");
+		},
+		m(target, anchor) {
+			insert_hydration(target, div, anchor);
+			if (if_block0) if_block0.m(div, null);
+			append_hydration(div, t0);
+			if (if_block1) if_block1.m(div, null);
+			append_hydration(div, t1);
+			if (if_block2) if_block2.m(div, null);
+			current = true;
+		},
+		p(ctx, [dirty]) {
+			if (/*entry*/ ctx[0][/*dataColumn*/ ctx[3]]) {
+				if (if_block0) {
+					if_block0.p(ctx, dirty);
+
+					if (dirty & /*entry, dataColumn*/ 9) {
+						transition_in(if_block0, 1);
+					}
+				} else {
+					if_block0 = create_if_block_2(ctx);
+					if_block0.c();
+					transition_in(if_block0, 1);
+					if_block0.m(div, t0);
+				}
+			} else if (if_block0) {
+				group_outros();
+
+				transition_out(if_block0, 1, 1, () => {
+					if_block0 = null;
+				});
+
+				check_outros();
+			}
+
+			if (/*entry*/ ctx[0][/*modelColumn*/ ctx[1]]) {
+				if (if_block1) {
+					if_block1.p(ctx, dirty);
+
+					if (dirty & /*entry, modelColumn*/ 3) {
+						transition_in(if_block1, 1);
+					}
+				} else {
+					if_block1 = create_if_block_1(ctx);
+					if_block1.c();
+					transition_in(if_block1, 1);
+					if_block1.m(div, t1);
+				}
+			} else if (if_block1) {
+				group_outros();
+
+				transition_out(if_block1, 1, 1, () => {
+					if_block1 = null;
+				});
+
+				check_outros();
+			}
+
+			if (/*entry*/ ctx[0][/*labelColumn*/ ctx[2]]) {
+				if (if_block2) {
+					if_block2.p(ctx, dirty);
+				} else {
+					if_block2 = create_if_block(ctx);
+					if_block2.c();
+					if_block2.m(div, null);
+				}
+			} else if (if_block2) {
+				if_block2.d(1);
+				if_block2 = null;
+			}
+		},
+		i(local) {
+			if (current) return;
+			transition_in(if_block0);
+			transition_in(if_block1);
+			current = true;
+		},
+		o(local) {
+			transition_out(if_block0);
+			transition_out(if_block1);
+			current = false;
+		},
+		d(detaching) {
+			if (detaching) detach(div);
+			if (if_block0) if_block0.d();
+			if (if_block1) if_block1.d();
+			if (if_block2) if_block2.d();
+		}
+	};
+}
+
+function instance($$self, $$props, $$invalidate) {
+	let { options } = $$props;
+	let { entry } = $$props;
+	let { modelColumn } = $$props;
+	let { labelColumn } = $$props;
+	let { dataColumn } = $$props;
+	let { idColumn } = $$props;
+
+	$$self.$$set = $$props => {
+		if ('options' in $$props) $$invalidate(4, options = $$props.options);
+		if ('entry' in $$props) $$invalidate(0, entry = $$props.entry);
+		if ('modelColumn' in $$props) $$invalidate(1, modelColumn = $$props.modelColumn);
+		if ('labelColumn' in $$props) $$invalidate(2, labelColumn = $$props.labelColumn);
+		if ('dataColumn' in $$props) $$invalidate(3, dataColumn = $$props.dataColumn);
+		if ('idColumn' in $$props) $$invalidate(5, idColumn = $$props.idColumn);
+	};
+
+	return [entry, modelColumn, labelColumn, dataColumn, options, idColumn];
+}
+
+class InstanceView extends SvelteComponent {
+	constructor(options) {
+		super();
+
+		init(
+			this,
+			options,
+			instance,
+			create_fragment,
+			safe_not_equal,
+			{
+				options: 4,
+				entry: 0,
+				modelColumn: 1,
+				labelColumn: 2,
+				dataColumn: 3,
+				idColumn: 5
+			},
+			add_css
+		);
+	}
+}
+
+function getInstance(
+  div,
+  viewOptions,
+  entry,
+  modelColumn,
+  labelColumn,
+  dataColumn,
+  idColumn
+) {
+  new InstanceView({
+    target: div,
+    props: {
+      entry: entry,
+      viewOptions: viewOptions,
+      modelColumn: modelColumn,
+      labelColumn: labelColumn,
+      dataColumn: dataColumn,
+      idColumn: idColumn,
+    },
+    hydrate: true,
+  });
+}
+
+// export function getOptions(div, setOptions) {
+//   new OptionsView({
+//     target: div,
+//     props: {
+//       setOptions,
+//     },
+//   });
+// }
+
+export { getInstance };
diff --git a/evals/.zeno_cache_crossword/folders.pickle b/evals/.zeno_cache_crossword/folders.pickle
index 7513c7fd6137405bd82a164a9a7ee2da08285244..78e001ddb25ca62e9d28ff19647b6b74da9e88e1 100644
--- a/evals/.zeno_cache_crossword/folders.pickle
+++ b/evals/.zeno_cache_crossword/folders.pickle
@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
 version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
-oid sha256:81ec1380bb1130072632b41ded270294e5b9ff8c0866ade69e3606084ecd1727
-size 34
+oid sha256:f6c279ba236427adf976566c3d1ba0c380fa755e4d85d5e52487df00b254d160
+size 51
diff --git a/evals/.zeno_cache_crossword/reports.pickle b/evals/.zeno_cache_crossword/reports.pickle
index fcc77fab6d40af13975c07213142985ed6c20abb..0749c660e2e550bde42c25f1aee3f1f2df33af05 100644
--- a/evals/.zeno_cache_crossword/reports.pickle
+++ b/evals/.zeno_cache_crossword/reports.pickle
@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
 version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
-oid sha256:5ad69482b153868cdce58b83056df03e9184c6065a8dc915b05010b4c070b007
-size 5052
+oid sha256:aa9c8d1b4b486cac0da6fcf8ffc061e142e5c33dc5006636d681ebe9505527b0
+size 6586
diff --git a/evals/.zeno_cache_crossword/slices.pickle b/evals/.zeno_cache_crossword/slices.pickle
index f073d13b2b39983ce02d7d066ba38839540b4daf..c0f4c616593115cdb9aec42c9b1c9ff8eeceda5f 100644
--- a/evals/.zeno_cache_crossword/slices.pickle
+++ b/evals/.zeno_cache_crossword/slices.pickle
@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
 version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
-oid sha256:fd1f52f83055628ab3c8903bc4b06789f62a5f0ebe41acc74811f59afe6c9df4
-size 4073
+oid sha256:193b14ae739ef894daaa36949b136aa07616fec6d1e623c250103dd93a9ba9f0
+size 5264
diff --git a/evals/.zeno_cache_emotional-intelligence/OUTPUTgpt-3_5-turbo-0301.pickle b/evals/.zeno_cache_emotional-intelligence/OUTPUTgpt-3_5-turbo-0301.pickle
deleted file mode 100644
index c1a373297f9b2237e0981f797ba8c342a45879c4..0000000000000000000000000000000000000000
--- a/evals/.zeno_cache_emotional-intelligence/OUTPUTgpt-3_5-turbo-0301.pickle
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,3 +0,0 @@
-version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
-oid sha256:50d21781d11f96809aa7a85b82db56a2668ba6f4720fce63dfae341799ec118a
-size 31925
diff --git a/evals/.zeno_cache_emotional-intelligence/OUTPUTgpt-3_5-turbo.pickle b/evals/.zeno_cache_emotional-intelligence/OUTPUTgpt-3_5-turbo.pickle
deleted file mode 100644
index 897416b1b09df89833f569ea7b424cc21c6caafd..0000000000000000000000000000000000000000
--- a/evals/.zeno_cache_emotional-intelligence/OUTPUTgpt-3_5-turbo.pickle
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,3 +0,0 @@
-version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
-oid sha256:ed31ac3196dc06c30dc72699021d213d63ed04f0ae7b3ea57a2cba30bd3674c1
-size 32133
diff --git a/evals/.zeno_cache_emotional-intelligence/POSTDISTILLcorrectgpt-3_5-turbo-0301.pickle b/evals/.zeno_cache_emotional-intelligence/POSTDISTILLcorrectgpt-3_5-turbo-0301.pickle
deleted file mode 100644
index 4c965d6513de4f4b313d14b80482fa345f17f4f4..0000000000000000000000000000000000000000
--- a/evals/.zeno_cache_emotional-intelligence/POSTDISTILLcorrectgpt-3_5-turbo-0301.pickle
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,3 +0,0 @@
-version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
-oid sha256:01b0699b53d72706048d2318a24f37337fc990190ada21e7f2ddae6bb9cdc3b4
-size 4164
diff --git a/evals/.zeno_cache_emotional-intelligence/POSTDISTILLcorrectgpt-3_5-turbo.pickle b/evals/.zeno_cache_emotional-intelligence/POSTDISTILLcorrectgpt-3_5-turbo.pickle
deleted file mode 100644
index b734648c137ba05d12fabd64f55fecfe50b8f3fc..0000000000000000000000000000000000000000
--- a/evals/.zeno_cache_emotional-intelligence/POSTDISTILLcorrectgpt-3_5-turbo.pickle
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,3 +0,0 @@
-version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
-oid sha256:4db6bc007f1e1df5f8f4e02e87e8bd220b745ffe3ad3eca796f525355b9155d1
-size 4125
diff --git a/evals/.zeno_cache_logic-statements/OUTPUTgpt-3_5-turbo.pickle b/evals/.zeno_cache_logic-statements/OUTPUTgpt-3_5-turbo.pickle
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7ea7646a109ca67faa8e5a809b5707403b1d0be8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/evals/.zeno_cache_logic-statements/OUTPUTgpt-3_5-turbo.pickle
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:e2d64320ff26ba332e8729fd38dec1ea5fd40b05117fbfa91af1063d3f21a5fb
+size 14176
diff --git a/evals/.zeno_cache_logic-statements/OUTPUTgpt-4.pickle b/evals/.zeno_cache_logic-statements/OUTPUTgpt-4.pickle
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e3a87ec0dc773208be9e06758550a98db344ee4d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/evals/.zeno_cache_logic-statements/OUTPUTgpt-4.pickle
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:42e4a7c700e49719075c965cdc376ec7977e769543510bc4f1ab8450eda45b96
+size 14924
diff --git a/evals/.zeno_cache_logic-statements/POSTDISTILLcorrectgpt-3_5-turbo.pickle b/evals/.zeno_cache_logic-statements/POSTDISTILLcorrectgpt-3_5-turbo.pickle
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..90a3c75311a7a87f2ffbd91a6fbeb2911df55c45
--- /dev/null
+++ b/evals/.zeno_cache_logic-statements/POSTDISTILLcorrectgpt-3_5-turbo.pickle
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:457d65ffcf25212437285af67f005ebc643ad5c052895c70b831510bc94a4a1e
+size 5475
diff --git a/evals/.zeno_cache_logic-statements/POSTDISTILLcorrectgpt-4.pickle b/evals/.zeno_cache_logic-statements/POSTDISTILLcorrectgpt-4.pickle
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..48536c146661edde2d5e4ab6f1ae6ba7a558b461
--- /dev/null
+++ b/evals/.zeno_cache_logic-statements/POSTDISTILLcorrectgpt-4.pickle
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:826d7978a5a140f576ef8a09baa5e215534619b403efd4186a54eb136a8be8c0
+size 5467
diff --git a/evals/.zeno_cache_logic-statements/folders.pickle b/evals/.zeno_cache_logic-statements/folders.pickle
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6f61606d9f0ce6528f4adfd3ebe8da336629c1a1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/evals/.zeno_cache_logic-statements/folders.pickle
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:ec0a6ccf9debf1c16781445c4b9106080d00478b0559469336db7c7b7b9711c8
+size 5
diff --git a/evals/.zeno_cache_logic-statements/reports.pickle b/evals/.zeno_cache_logic-statements/reports.pickle
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6f61606d9f0ce6528f4adfd3ebe8da336629c1a1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/evals/.zeno_cache_logic-statements/reports.pickle
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:ec0a6ccf9debf1c16781445c4b9106080d00478b0559469336db7c7b7b9711c8
+size 5
diff --git a/evals/.zeno_cache_logic-statements/view.mjs b/evals/.zeno_cache_logic-statements/view.mjs
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a233ab94985094652cc8d8cde2fe6f8ff3f40793
--- /dev/null
+++ b/evals/.zeno_cache_logic-statements/view.mjs
@@ -0,0 +1,1574 @@
+function noop() { }
+function run(fn) {
+    return fn();
+}
+function blank_object() {
+    return Object.create(null);
+}
+function run_all(fns) {
+    fns.forEach(run);
+}
+function is_function(thing) {
+    return typeof thing === 'function';
+}
+function safe_not_equal(a, b) {
+    return a != a ? b == b : a !== b || ((a && typeof a === 'object') || typeof a === 'function');
+}
+function is_empty(obj) {
+    return Object.keys(obj).length === 0;
+}
+function null_to_empty(value) {
+    return value == null ? '' : value;
+}
+
+// Track which nodes are claimed during hydration. Unclaimed nodes can then be removed from the DOM
+// at the end of hydration without touching the remaining nodes.
+let is_hydrating = false;
+function start_hydrating() {
+    is_hydrating = true;
+}
+function end_hydrating() {
+    is_hydrating = false;
+}
+function upper_bound(low, high, key, value) {
+    // Return first index of value larger than input value in the range [low, high)
+    while (low < high) {
+        const mid = low + ((high - low) >> 1);
+        if (key(mid) <= value) {
+            low = mid + 1;
+        }
+        else {
+            high = mid;
+        }
+    }
+    return low;
+}
+function init_hydrate(target) {
+    if (target.hydrate_init)
+        return;
+    target.hydrate_init = true;
+    // We know that all children have claim_order values since the unclaimed have been detached if target is not <head>
+    let children = target.childNodes;
+    // If target is <head>, there may be children without claim_order
+    if (target.nodeName === 'HEAD') {
+        const myChildren = [];
+        for (let i = 0; i < children.length; i++) {
+            const node = children[i];
+            if (node.claim_order !== undefined) {
+                myChildren.push(node);
+            }
+        }
+        children = myChildren;
+    }
+    /*
+    * Reorder claimed children optimally.
+    * We can reorder claimed children optimally by finding the longest subsequence of
+    * nodes that are already claimed in order and only moving the rest. The longest
+    * subsequence of nodes that are claimed in order can be found by
+    * computing the longest increasing subsequence of .claim_order values.
+    *
+    * This algorithm is optimal in generating the least amount of reorder operations
+    * possible.
+    *
+    * Proof:
+    * We know that, given a set of reordering operations, the nodes that do not move
+    * always form an increasing subsequence, since they do not move among each other
+    * meaning that they must be already ordered among each other. Thus, the maximal
+    * set of nodes that do not move form a longest increasing subsequence.
+    */
+    // Compute longest increasing subsequence
+    // m: subsequence length j => index k of smallest value that ends an increasing subsequence of length j
+    const m = new Int32Array(children.length + 1);
+    // Predecessor indices + 1
+    const p = new Int32Array(children.length);
+    m[0] = -1;
+    let longest = 0;
+    for (let i = 0; i < children.length; i++) {
+        const current = children[i].claim_order;
+        // Find the largest subsequence length such that it ends in a value less than our current value
+        // upper_bound returns first greater value, so we subtract one
+        // with fast path for when we are on the current longest subsequence
+        const seqLen = ((longest > 0 && children[m[longest]].claim_order <= current) ? longest + 1 : upper_bound(1, longest, idx => children[m[idx]].claim_order, current)) - 1;
+        p[i] = m[seqLen] + 1;
+        const newLen = seqLen + 1;
+        // We can guarantee that current is the smallest value. Otherwise, we would have generated a longer sequence.
+        m[newLen] = i;
+        longest = Math.max(newLen, longest);
+    }
+    // The longest increasing subsequence of nodes (initially reversed)
+    const lis = [];
+    // The rest of the nodes, nodes that will be moved
+    const toMove = [];
+    let last = children.length - 1;
+    for (let cur = m[longest] + 1; cur != 0; cur = p[cur - 1]) {
+        lis.push(children[cur - 1]);
+        for (; last >= cur; last--) {
+            toMove.push(children[last]);
+        }
+        last--;
+    }
+    for (; last >= 0; last--) {
+        toMove.push(children[last]);
+    }
+    lis.reverse();
+    // We sort the nodes being moved to guarantee that their insertion order matches the claim order
+    toMove.sort((a, b) => a.claim_order - b.claim_order);
+    // Finally, we move the nodes
+    for (let i = 0, j = 0; i < toMove.length; i++) {
+        while (j < lis.length && toMove[i].claim_order >= lis[j].claim_order) {
+            j++;
+        }
+        const anchor = j < lis.length ? lis[j] : null;
+        target.insertBefore(toMove[i], anchor);
+    }
+}
+function append(target, node) {
+    target.appendChild(node);
+}
+function append_styles(target, style_sheet_id, styles) {
+    const append_styles_to = get_root_for_style(target);
+    if (!append_styles_to.getElementById(style_sheet_id)) {
+        const style = element('style');
+        style.id = style_sheet_id;
+        style.textContent = styles;
+        append_stylesheet(append_styles_to, style);
+    }
+}
+function get_root_for_style(node) {
+    if (!node)
+        return document;
+    const root = node.getRootNode ? node.getRootNode() : node.ownerDocument;
+    if (root && root.host) {
+        return root;
+    }
+    return node.ownerDocument;
+}
+function append_stylesheet(node, style) {
+    append(node.head || node, style);
+    return style.sheet;
+}
+function append_hydration(target, node) {
+    if (is_hydrating) {
+        init_hydrate(target);
+        if ((target.actual_end_child === undefined) || ((target.actual_end_child !== null) && (target.actual_end_child.parentNode !== target))) {
+            target.actual_end_child = target.firstChild;
+        }
+        // Skip nodes of undefined ordering
+        while ((target.actual_end_child !== null) && (target.actual_end_child.claim_order === undefined)) {
+            target.actual_end_child = target.actual_end_child.nextSibling;
+        }
+        if (node !== target.actual_end_child) {
+            // We only insert if the ordering of this node should be modified or the parent node is not target
+            if (node.claim_order !== undefined || node.parentNode !== target) {
+                target.insertBefore(node, target.actual_end_child);
+            }
+        }
+        else {
+            target.actual_end_child = node.nextSibling;
+        }
+    }
+    else if (node.parentNode !== target || node.nextSibling !== null) {
+        target.appendChild(node);
+    }
+}
+function insert_hydration(target, node, anchor) {
+    if (is_hydrating && !anchor) {
+        append_hydration(target, node);
+    }
+    else if (node.parentNode !== target || node.nextSibling != anchor) {
+        target.insertBefore(node, anchor || null);
+    }
+}
+function detach(node) {
+    if (node.parentNode) {
+        node.parentNode.removeChild(node);
+    }
+}
+function destroy_each(iterations, detaching) {
+    for (let i = 0; i < iterations.length; i += 1) {
+        if (iterations[i])
+            iterations[i].d(detaching);
+    }
+}
+function element(name) {
+    return document.createElement(name);
+}
+function svg_element(name) {
+    return document.createElementNS('http://www.w3.org/2000/svg', name);
+}
+function text(data) {
+    return document.createTextNode(data);
+}
+function space() {
+    return text(' ');
+}
+function empty() {
+    return text('');
+}
+function attr(node, attribute, value) {
+    if (value == null)
+        node.removeAttribute(attribute);
+    else if (node.getAttribute(attribute) !== value)
+        node.setAttribute(attribute, value);
+}
+function children(element) {
+    return Array.from(element.childNodes);
+}
+function init_claim_info(nodes) {
+    if (nodes.claim_info === undefined) {
+        nodes.claim_info = { last_index: 0, total_claimed: 0 };
+    }
+}
+function claim_node(nodes, predicate, processNode, createNode, dontUpdateLastIndex = false) {
+    // Try to find nodes in an order such that we lengthen the longest increasing subsequence
+    init_claim_info(nodes);
+    const resultNode = (() => {
+        // We first try to find an element after the previous one
+        for (let i = nodes.claim_info.last_index; i < nodes.length; i++) {
+            const node = nodes[i];
+            if (predicate(node)) {
+                const replacement = processNode(node);
+                if (replacement === undefined) {
+                    nodes.splice(i, 1);
+                }
+                else {
+                    nodes[i] = replacement;
+                }
+                if (!dontUpdateLastIndex) {
+                    nodes.claim_info.last_index = i;
+                }
+                return node;
+            }
+        }
+        // Otherwise, we try to find one before
+        // We iterate in reverse so that we don't go too far back
+        for (let i = nodes.claim_info.last_index - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
+            const node = nodes[i];
+            if (predicate(node)) {
+                const replacement = processNode(node);
+                if (replacement === undefined) {
+                    nodes.splice(i, 1);
+                }
+                else {
+                    nodes[i] = replacement;
+                }
+                if (!dontUpdateLastIndex) {
+                    nodes.claim_info.last_index = i;
+                }
+                else if (replacement === undefined) {
+                    // Since we spliced before the last_index, we decrease it
+                    nodes.claim_info.last_index--;
+                }
+                return node;
+            }
+        }
+        // If we can't find any matching node, we create a new one
+        return createNode();
+    })();
+    resultNode.claim_order = nodes.claim_info.total_claimed;
+    nodes.claim_info.total_claimed += 1;
+    return resultNode;
+}
+function claim_element_base(nodes, name, attributes, create_element) {
+    return claim_node(nodes, (node) => node.nodeName === name, (node) => {
+        const remove = [];
+        for (let j = 0; j < node.attributes.length; j++) {
+            const attribute = node.attributes[j];
+            if (!attributes[attribute.name]) {
+                remove.push(attribute.name);
+            }
+        }
+        remove.forEach(v => node.removeAttribute(v));
+        return undefined;
+    }, () => create_element(name));
+}
+function claim_element(nodes, name, attributes) {
+    return claim_element_base(nodes, name, attributes, element);
+}
+function claim_svg_element(nodes, name, attributes) {
+    return claim_element_base(nodes, name, attributes, svg_element);
+}
+function claim_text(nodes, data) {
+    return claim_node(nodes, (node) => node.nodeType === 3, (node) => {
+        const dataStr = '' + data;
+        if (node.data.startsWith(dataStr)) {
+            if (node.data.length !== dataStr.length) {
+                return node.splitText(dataStr.length);
+            }
+        }
+        else {
+            node.data = dataStr;
+        }
+    }, () => text(data), true // Text nodes should not update last index since it is likely not worth it to eliminate an increasing subsequence of actual elements
+    );
+}
+function claim_space(nodes) {
+    return claim_text(nodes, ' ');
+}
+function set_data(text, data) {
+    data = '' + data;
+    if (text.wholeText !== data)
+        text.data = data;
+}
+
+let current_component;
+function set_current_component(component) {
+    current_component = component;
+}
+
+const dirty_components = [];
+const binding_callbacks = [];
+const render_callbacks = [];
+const flush_callbacks = [];
+const resolved_promise = Promise.resolve();
+let update_scheduled = false;
+function schedule_update() {
+    if (!update_scheduled) {
+        update_scheduled = true;
+        resolved_promise.then(flush);
+    }
+}
+function add_render_callback(fn) {
+    render_callbacks.push(fn);
+}
+// flush() calls callbacks in this order:
+// 1. All beforeUpdate callbacks, in order: parents before children
+// 2. All bind:this callbacks, in reverse order: children before parents.
+// 3. All afterUpdate callbacks, in order: parents before children. EXCEPT
+//    for afterUpdates called during the initial onMount, which are called in
+//    reverse order: children before parents.
+// Since callbacks might update component values, which could trigger another
+// call to flush(), the following steps guard against this:
+// 1. During beforeUpdate, any updated components will be added to the
+//    dirty_components array and will cause a reentrant call to flush(). Because
+//    the flush index is kept outside the function, the reentrant call will pick
+//    up where the earlier call left off and go through all dirty components. The
+//    current_component value is saved and restored so that the reentrant call will
+//    not interfere with the "parent" flush() call.
+// 2. bind:this callbacks cannot trigger new flush() calls.
+// 3. During afterUpdate, any updated components will NOT have their afterUpdate
+//    callback called a second time; the seen_callbacks set, outside the flush()
+//    function, guarantees this behavior.
+const seen_callbacks = new Set();
+let flushidx = 0; // Do *not* move this inside the flush() function
+function flush() {
+    // Do not reenter flush while dirty components are updated, as this can
+    // result in an infinite loop. Instead, let the inner flush handle it.
+    // Reentrancy is ok afterwards for bindings etc.
+    if (flushidx !== 0) {
+        return;
+    }
+    const saved_component = current_component;
+    do {
+        // first, call beforeUpdate functions
+        // and update components
+        try {
+            while (flushidx < dirty_components.length) {
+                const component = dirty_components[flushidx];
+                flushidx++;
+                set_current_component(component);
+                update(component.$$);
+            }
+        }
+        catch (e) {
+            // reset dirty state to not end up in a deadlocked state and then rethrow
+            dirty_components.length = 0;
+            flushidx = 0;
+            throw e;
+        }
+        set_current_component(null);
+        dirty_components.length = 0;
+        flushidx = 0;
+        while (binding_callbacks.length)
+            binding_callbacks.pop()();
+        // then, once components are updated, call
+        // afterUpdate functions. This may cause
+        // subsequent updates...
+        for (let i = 0; i < render_callbacks.length; i += 1) {
+            const callback = render_callbacks[i];
+            if (!seen_callbacks.has(callback)) {
+                // ...so guard against infinite loops
+                seen_callbacks.add(callback);
+                callback();
+            }
+        }
+        render_callbacks.length = 0;
+    } while (dirty_components.length);
+    while (flush_callbacks.length) {
+        flush_callbacks.pop()();
+    }
+    update_scheduled = false;
+    seen_callbacks.clear();
+    set_current_component(saved_component);
+}
+function update($$) {
+    if ($$.fragment !== null) {
+        $$.update();
+        run_all($$.before_update);
+        const dirty = $$.dirty;
+        $$.dirty = [-1];
+        $$.fragment && $$.fragment.p($$.ctx, dirty);
+        $$.after_update.forEach(add_render_callback);
+    }
+}
+const outroing = new Set();
+let outros;
+function group_outros() {
+    outros = {
+        r: 0,
+        c: [],
+        p: outros // parent group
+    };
+}
+function check_outros() {
+    if (!outros.r) {
+        run_all(outros.c);
+    }
+    outros = outros.p;
+}
+function transition_in(block, local) {
+    if (block && block.i) {
+        outroing.delete(block);
+        block.i(local);
+    }
+}
+function transition_out(block, local, detach, callback) {
+    if (block && block.o) {
+        if (outroing.has(block))
+            return;
+        outroing.add(block);
+        outros.c.push(() => {
+            outroing.delete(block);
+            if (callback) {
+                if (detach)
+                    block.d(1);
+                callback();
+            }
+        });
+        block.o(local);
+    }
+    else if (callback) {
+        callback();
+    }
+}
+function create_component(block) {
+    block && block.c();
+}
+function claim_component(block, parent_nodes) {
+    block && block.l(parent_nodes);
+}
+function mount_component(component, target, anchor, customElement) {
+    const { fragment, after_update } = component.$$;
+    fragment && fragment.m(target, anchor);
+    if (!customElement) {
+        // onMount happens before the initial afterUpdate
+        add_render_callback(() => {
+            const new_on_destroy = component.$$.on_mount.map(run).filter(is_function);
+            // if the component was destroyed immediately
+            // it will update the `$$.on_destroy` reference to `null`.
+            // the destructured on_destroy may still reference to the old array
+            if (component.$$.on_destroy) {
+                component.$$.on_destroy.push(...new_on_destroy);
+            }
+            else {
+                // Edge case - component was destroyed immediately,
+                // most likely as a result of a binding initialising
+                run_all(new_on_destroy);
+            }
+            component.$$.on_mount = [];
+        });
+    }
+    after_update.forEach(add_render_callback);
+}
+function destroy_component(component, detaching) {
+    const $$ = component.$$;
+    if ($$.fragment !== null) {
+        run_all($$.on_destroy);
+        $$.fragment && $$.fragment.d(detaching);
+        // TODO null out other refs, including component.$$ (but need to
+        // preserve final state?)
+        $$.on_destroy = $$.fragment = null;
+        $$.ctx = [];
+    }
+}
+function make_dirty(component, i) {
+    if (component.$$.dirty[0] === -1) {
+        dirty_components.push(component);
+        schedule_update();
+        component.$$.dirty.fill(0);
+    }
+    component.$$.dirty[(i / 31) | 0] |= (1 << (i % 31));
+}
+function init(component, options, instance, create_fragment, not_equal, props, append_styles, dirty = [-1]) {
+    const parent_component = current_component;
+    set_current_component(component);
+    const $$ = component.$$ = {
+        fragment: null,
+        ctx: [],
+        // state
+        props,
+        update: noop,
+        not_equal,
+        bound: blank_object(),
+        // lifecycle
+        on_mount: [],
+        on_destroy: [],
+        on_disconnect: [],
+        before_update: [],
+        after_update: [],
+        context: new Map(options.context || (parent_component ? parent_component.$$.context : [])),
+        // everything else
+        callbacks: blank_object(),
+        dirty,
+        skip_bound: false,
+        root: options.target || parent_component.$$.root
+    };
+    append_styles && append_styles($$.root);
+    let ready = false;
+    $$.ctx = instance
+        ? instance(component, options.props || {}, (i, ret, ...rest) => {
+            const value = rest.length ? rest[0] : ret;
+            if ($$.ctx && not_equal($$.ctx[i], $$.ctx[i] = value)) {
+                if (!$$.skip_bound && $$.bound[i])
+                    $$.bound[i](value);
+                if (ready)
+                    make_dirty(component, i);
+            }
+            return ret;
+        })
+        : [];
+    $$.update();
+    ready = true;
+    run_all($$.before_update);
+    // `false` as a special case of no DOM component
+    $$.fragment = create_fragment ? create_fragment($$.ctx) : false;
+    if (options.target) {
+        if (options.hydrate) {
+            start_hydrating();
+            const nodes = children(options.target);
+            // eslint-disable-next-line @typescript-eslint/no-non-null-assertion
+            $$.fragment && $$.fragment.l(nodes);
+            nodes.forEach(detach);
+        }
+        else {
+            // eslint-disable-next-line @typescript-eslint/no-non-null-assertion
+            $$.fragment && $$.fragment.c();
+        }
+        if (options.intro)
+            transition_in(component.$$.fragment);
+        mount_component(component, options.target, options.anchor, options.customElement);
+        end_hydrating();
+        flush();
+    }
+    set_current_component(parent_component);
+}
+/**
+ * Base class for Svelte components. Used when dev=false.
+ */
+class SvelteComponent {
+    $destroy() {
+        destroy_component(this, 1);
+        this.$destroy = noop;
+    }
+    $on(type, callback) {
+        if (!is_function(callback)) {
+            return noop;
+        }
+        const callbacks = (this.$$.callbacks[type] || (this.$$.callbacks[type] = []));
+        callbacks.push(callback);
+        return () => {
+            const index = callbacks.indexOf(callback);
+            if (index !== -1)
+                callbacks.splice(index, 1);
+        };
+    }
+    $set($$props) {
+        if (this.$$set && !is_empty($$props)) {
+            this.$$.skip_bound = true;
+            this.$$set($$props);
+            this.$$.skip_bound = false;
+        }
+    }
+}
+
+/* src/AssistantBlock.svelte generated by Svelte v3.55.1 */
+
+function add_css$3(target) {
+	append_styles(target, "svelte-1e3mbn4", ".model.svelte-1e3mbn4.svelte-1e3mbn4{fill:var(--logo)}.no-model.svelte-1e3mbn4.svelte-1e3mbn4{fill:var(--G3)}.model-border.svelte-1e3mbn4.svelte-1e3mbn4{border:1px solid var(--logo)}.no-model-border.svelte-1e3mbn4.svelte-1e3mbn4{border:1px solid rgba(224, 224, 224, 1)}.box.svelte-1e3mbn4.svelte-1e3mbn4{margin-top:10px;margin-bottom:10px;display:flex;align-items:start}.box.svelte-1e3mbn4 svg.svelte-1e3mbn4{min-width:24px;width:24px;margin-right:10px;margin-top:7px}.chat.svelte-1e3mbn4.svelte-1e3mbn4{border-radius:5px;margin:0px;padding:10px;overflow-wrap:anywhere}");
+}
+
+function create_fragment$3(ctx) {
+	let div;
+	let svg;
+	let path;
+	let svg_class_value;
+	let t0;
+	let p;
+	let t1;
+	let p_class_value;
+
+	return {
+		c() {
+			div = element("div");
+			svg = svg_element("svg");
+			path = svg_element("path");
+			t0 = space();
+			p = element("p");
+			t1 = text(/*input*/ ctx[0]);
+			this.h();
+		},
+		l(nodes) {
+			div = claim_element(nodes, "DIV", { class: true });
+			var div_nodes = children(div);
+			svg = claim_svg_element(div_nodes, "svg", { xmlns: true, viewBox: true, class: true });
+			var svg_nodes = children(svg);
+			path = claim_svg_element(svg_nodes, "path", { d: true });
+			children(path).forEach(detach);
+			svg_nodes.forEach(detach);
+			t0 = claim_space(div_nodes);
+			p = claim_element(div_nodes, "P", { class: true });
+			var p_nodes = children(p);
+			t1 = claim_text(p_nodes, /*input*/ ctx[0]);
+			p_nodes.forEach(detach);
+			div_nodes.forEach(detach);
+			this.h();
+		},
+		h() {
+			attr(path, "d", "M320 0c17.7 0 32 14.3 32 32V96H472c39.8 0 72 32.2 72 72V440c0 39.8-32.2 72-72 72H168c-39.8 0-72-32.2-72-72V168c0-39.8 32.2-72 72-72H288V32c0-17.7 14.3-32 32-32zM208 384c-8.8 0-16 7.2-16 16s7.2 16 16 16h32c8.8 0 16-7.2 16-16s-7.2-16-16-16H208zm96 0c-8.8 0-16 7.2-16 16s7.2 16 16 16h32c8.8 0 16-7.2 16-16s-7.2-16-16-16H304zm96 0c-8.8 0-16 7.2-16 16s7.2 16 16 16h32c8.8 0 16-7.2 16-16s-7.2-16-16-16H400zM264 256a40 40 0 1 0 -80 0 40 40 0 1 0 80 0zm152 40a40 40 0 1 0 0-80 40 40 0 1 0 0 80zM48 224H64V416H48c-26.5 0-48-21.5-48-48V272c0-26.5 21.5-48 48-48zm544 0c26.5 0 48 21.5 48 48v96c0 26.5-21.5 48-48 48H576V224h16z");
+			attr(svg, "xmlns", "http://www.w3.org/2000/svg");
+			attr(svg, "viewBox", "0 0 640 512");
+			attr(svg, "class", svg_class_value = "" + (null_to_empty(/*output*/ ctx[1] ? "model" : "no-model") + " svelte-1e3mbn4"));
+			attr(p, "class", p_class_value = "chat " + (/*output*/ ctx[1] ? 'model-border' : 'no-model-border') + " svelte-1e3mbn4");
+			attr(div, "class", "box svelte-1e3mbn4");
+		},
+		m(target, anchor) {
+			insert_hydration(target, div, anchor);
+			append_hydration(div, svg);
+			append_hydration(svg, path);
+			append_hydration(div, t0);
+			append_hydration(div, p);
+			append_hydration(p, t1);
+		},
+		p(ctx, [dirty]) {
+			if (dirty & /*output*/ 2 && svg_class_value !== (svg_class_value = "" + (null_to_empty(/*output*/ ctx[1] ? "model" : "no-model") + " svelte-1e3mbn4"))) {
+				attr(svg, "class", svg_class_value);
+			}
+
+			if (dirty & /*input*/ 1) set_data(t1, /*input*/ ctx[0]);
+
+			if (dirty & /*output*/ 2 && p_class_value !== (p_class_value = "chat " + (/*output*/ ctx[1] ? 'model-border' : 'no-model-border') + " svelte-1e3mbn4")) {
+				attr(p, "class", p_class_value);
+			}
+		},
+		i: noop,
+		o: noop,
+		d(detaching) {
+			if (detaching) detach(div);
+		}
+	};
+}
+
+function instance$3($$self, $$props, $$invalidate) {
+	let { input } = $$props;
+	let { output = false } = $$props;
+
+	$$self.$$set = $$props => {
+		if ('input' in $$props) $$invalidate(0, input = $$props.input);
+		if ('output' in $$props) $$invalidate(1, output = $$props.output);
+	};
+
+	return [input, output];
+}
+
+class AssistantBlock extends SvelteComponent {
+	constructor(options) {
+		super();
+		init(this, options, instance$3, create_fragment$3, safe_not_equal, { input: 0, output: 1 }, add_css$3);
+	}
+}
+
+/* src/SystemBlock.svelte generated by Svelte v3.55.1 */
+
+function add_css$2(target) {
+	append_styles(target, "svelte-18o0ab2", "p.svelte-18o0ab2{margin:0px}");
+}
+
+function create_fragment$2(ctx) {
+	let p;
+	let b;
+	let t0;
+	let t1;
+	let span;
+	let t2;
+
+	return {
+		c() {
+			p = element("p");
+			b = element("b");
+			t0 = text("System:");
+			t1 = space();
+			span = element("span");
+			t2 = text(/*input*/ ctx[0]);
+			this.h();
+		},
+		l(nodes) {
+			p = claim_element(nodes, "P", { class: true });
+			var p_nodes = children(p);
+			b = claim_element(p_nodes, "B", {});
+			var b_nodes = children(b);
+			t0 = claim_text(b_nodes, "System:");
+			b_nodes.forEach(detach);
+			t1 = claim_space(p_nodes);
+			span = claim_element(p_nodes, "SPAN", {});
+			var span_nodes = children(span);
+			t2 = claim_text(span_nodes, /*input*/ ctx[0]);
+			span_nodes.forEach(detach);
+			p_nodes.forEach(detach);
+			this.h();
+		},
+		h() {
+			attr(p, "class", "svelte-18o0ab2");
+		},
+		m(target, anchor) {
+			insert_hydration(target, p, anchor);
+			append_hydration(p, b);
+			append_hydration(b, t0);
+			append_hydration(p, t1);
+			append_hydration(p, span);
+			append_hydration(span, t2);
+		},
+		p(ctx, [dirty]) {
+			if (dirty & /*input*/ 1) set_data(t2, /*input*/ ctx[0]);
+		},
+		i: noop,
+		o: noop,
+		d(detaching) {
+			if (detaching) detach(p);
+		}
+	};
+}
+
+function instance$2($$self, $$props, $$invalidate) {
+	let { input } = $$props;
+
+	$$self.$$set = $$props => {
+		if ('input' in $$props) $$invalidate(0, input = $$props.input);
+	};
+
+	return [input];
+}
+
+class SystemBlock extends SvelteComponent {
+	constructor(options) {
+		super();
+		init(this, options, instance$2, create_fragment$2, safe_not_equal, { input: 0 }, add_css$2);
+	}
+}
+
+/* src/UserBlock.svelte generated by Svelte v3.55.1 */
+
+function add_css$1(target) {
+	append_styles(target, "svelte-1lys9p1", ".box.svelte-1lys9p1.svelte-1lys9p1{margin-top:10px;margin-bottom:10px;display:flex;align-items:start}.box.svelte-1lys9p1 svg.svelte-1lys9p1{min-width:24px;width:24px;margin-right:10px;margin-top:7px;fill:var(--G3)}.chat.svelte-1lys9p1.svelte-1lys9p1{border:1px solid rgba(224, 224, 224, 1);border-radius:5px;margin:0px;padding:10px;overflow-wrap:anywhere}");
+}
+
+function create_fragment$1(ctx) {
+	let div;
+	let svg;
+	let path;
+	let t0;
+	let p;
+	let t1;
+
+	return {
+		c() {
+			div = element("div");
+			svg = svg_element("svg");
+			path = svg_element("path");
+			t0 = space();
+			p = element("p");
+			t1 = text(/*input*/ ctx[0]);
+			this.h();
+		},
+		l(nodes) {
+			div = claim_element(nodes, "DIV", { class: true });
+			var div_nodes = children(div);
+			svg = claim_svg_element(div_nodes, "svg", { xmlns: true, viewBox: true, class: true });
+			var svg_nodes = children(svg);
+			path = claim_svg_element(svg_nodes, "path", { d: true });
+			children(path).forEach(detach);
+			svg_nodes.forEach(detach);
+			t0 = claim_space(div_nodes);
+			p = claim_element(div_nodes, "P", { class: true });
+			var p_nodes = children(p);
+			t1 = claim_text(p_nodes, /*input*/ ctx[0]);
+			p_nodes.forEach(detach);
+			div_nodes.forEach(detach);
+			this.h();
+		},
+		h() {
+			attr(path, "d", "M224 256A128 128 0 1 0 224 0a128 128 0 1 0 0 256zm-45.7 48C79.8 304 0 383.8 0 482.3C0 498.7 13.3 512 29.7 512H418.3c16.4 0 29.7-13.3 29.7-29.7C448 383.8 368.2 304 269.7 304H178.3z");
+			attr(svg, "xmlns", "http://www.w3.org/2000/svg");
+			attr(svg, "viewBox", "0 0 448 512");
+			attr(svg, "class", "svelte-1lys9p1");
+			attr(p, "class", "chat svelte-1lys9p1");
+			attr(div, "class", "box svelte-1lys9p1");
+		},
+		m(target, anchor) {
+			insert_hydration(target, div, anchor);
+			append_hydration(div, svg);
+			append_hydration(svg, path);
+			append_hydration(div, t0);
+			append_hydration(div, p);
+			append_hydration(p, t1);
+		},
+		p(ctx, [dirty]) {
+			if (dirty & /*input*/ 1) set_data(t1, /*input*/ ctx[0]);
+		},
+		i: noop,
+		o: noop,
+		d(detaching) {
+			if (detaching) detach(div);
+		}
+	};
+}
+
+function instance$1($$self, $$props, $$invalidate) {
+	let { input } = $$props;
+
+	$$self.$$set = $$props => {
+		if ('input' in $$props) $$invalidate(0, input = $$props.input);
+	};
+
+	return [input];
+}
+
+class UserBlock extends SvelteComponent {
+	constructor(options) {
+		super();
+		init(this, options, instance$1, create_fragment$1, safe_not_equal, { input: 0 }, add_css$1);
+	}
+}
+
+/* src/InstanceView.svelte generated by Svelte v3.55.1 */
+
+function add_css(target) {
+	append_styles(target, "svelte-eoma5v", "#container.svelte-eoma5v{border:0.5px solid rgb(224, 224, 224);min-width:350px;border-radius:2px;padding:10px}.label.svelte-eoma5v{margin-right:5px;font-weight:700}p.svelte-eoma5v{margin:5px;overflow-wrap:anywhere}");
+}
+
+function get_each_context(ctx, list, i) {
+	const child_ctx = ctx.slice();
+	child_ctx[6] = list[i];
+	return child_ctx;
+}
+
+// (21:2) {#if entry[dataColumn]}
+function create_if_block_2(ctx) {
+	let current_block_type_index;
+	let if_block;
+	let if_block_anchor;
+	let current;
+	const if_block_creators = [create_if_block_3, create_else_block];
+	const if_blocks = [];
+
+	function select_block_type(ctx, dirty) {
+		if (typeof /*entry*/ ctx[0][/*dataColumn*/ ctx[3]] === "string") return 0;
+		return 1;
+	}
+
+	current_block_type_index = select_block_type(ctx);
+	if_block = if_blocks[current_block_type_index] = if_block_creators[current_block_type_index](ctx);
+
+	return {
+		c() {
+			if_block.c();
+			if_block_anchor = empty();
+		},
+		l(nodes) {
+			if_block.l(nodes);
+			if_block_anchor = empty();
+		},
+		m(target, anchor) {
+			if_blocks[current_block_type_index].m(target, anchor);
+			insert_hydration(target, if_block_anchor, anchor);
+			current = true;
+		},
+		p(ctx, dirty) {
+			let previous_block_index = current_block_type_index;
+			current_block_type_index = select_block_type(ctx);
+
+			if (current_block_type_index === previous_block_index) {
+				if_blocks[current_block_type_index].p(ctx, dirty);
+			} else {
+				group_outros();
+
+				transition_out(if_blocks[previous_block_index], 1, 1, () => {
+					if_blocks[previous_block_index] = null;
+				});
+
+				check_outros();
+				if_block = if_blocks[current_block_type_index];
+
+				if (!if_block) {
+					if_block = if_blocks[current_block_type_index] = if_block_creators[current_block_type_index](ctx);
+					if_block.c();
+				} else {
+					if_block.p(ctx, dirty);
+				}
+
+				transition_in(if_block, 1);
+				if_block.m(if_block_anchor.parentNode, if_block_anchor);
+			}
+		},
+		i(local) {
+			if (current) return;
+			transition_in(if_block);
+			current = true;
+		},
+		o(local) {
+			transition_out(if_block);
+			current = false;
+		},
+		d(detaching) {
+			if_blocks[current_block_type_index].d(detaching);
+			if (detaching) detach(if_block_anchor);
+		}
+	};
+}
+
+// (24:4) {:else}
+function create_else_block(ctx) {
+	let each_1_anchor;
+	let current;
+	let each_value = /*entry*/ ctx[0][/*dataColumn*/ ctx[3]];
+	let each_blocks = [];
+
+	for (let i = 0; i < each_value.length; i += 1) {
+		each_blocks[i] = create_each_block(get_each_context(ctx, each_value, i));
+	}
+
+	const out = i => transition_out(each_blocks[i], 1, 1, () => {
+		each_blocks[i] = null;
+	});
+
+	return {
+		c() {
+			for (let i = 0; i < each_blocks.length; i += 1) {
+				each_blocks[i].c();
+			}
+
+			each_1_anchor = empty();
+		},
+		l(nodes) {
+			for (let i = 0; i < each_blocks.length; i += 1) {
+				each_blocks[i].l(nodes);
+			}
+
+			each_1_anchor = empty();
+		},
+		m(target, anchor) {
+			for (let i = 0; i < each_blocks.length; i += 1) {
+				each_blocks[i].m(target, anchor);
+			}
+
+			insert_hydration(target, each_1_anchor, anchor);
+			current = true;
+		},
+		p(ctx, dirty) {
+			if (dirty & /*entry, dataColumn*/ 9) {
+				each_value = /*entry*/ ctx[0][/*dataColumn*/ ctx[3]];
+				let i;
+
+				for (i = 0; i < each_value.length; i += 1) {
+					const child_ctx = get_each_context(ctx, each_value, i);
+
+					if (each_blocks[i]) {
+						each_blocks[i].p(child_ctx, dirty);
+						transition_in(each_blocks[i], 1);
+					} else {
+						each_blocks[i] = create_each_block(child_ctx);
+						each_blocks[i].c();
+						transition_in(each_blocks[i], 1);
+						each_blocks[i].m(each_1_anchor.parentNode, each_1_anchor);
+					}
+				}
+
+				group_outros();
+
+				for (i = each_value.length; i < each_blocks.length; i += 1) {
+					out(i);
+				}
+
+				check_outros();
+			}
+		},
+		i(local) {
+			if (current) return;
+
+			for (let i = 0; i < each_value.length; i += 1) {
+				transition_in(each_blocks[i]);
+			}
+
+			current = true;
+		},
+		o(local) {
+			each_blocks = each_blocks.filter(Boolean);
+
+			for (let i = 0; i < each_blocks.length; i += 1) {
+				transition_out(each_blocks[i]);
+			}
+
+			current = false;
+		},
+		d(detaching) {
+			destroy_each(each_blocks, detaching);
+			if (detaching) detach(each_1_anchor);
+		}
+	};
+}
+
+// (22:4) {#if typeof entry[dataColumn] === "string"}
+function create_if_block_3(ctx) {
+	let userblock;
+	let current;
+
+	userblock = new UserBlock({
+			props: {
+				input: /*entry*/ ctx[0][/*dataColumn*/ ctx[3]]
+			}
+		});
+
+	return {
+		c() {
+			create_component(userblock.$$.fragment);
+		},
+		l(nodes) {
+			claim_component(userblock.$$.fragment, nodes);
+		},
+		m(target, anchor) {
+			mount_component(userblock, target, anchor);
+			current = true;
+		},
+		p(ctx, dirty) {
+			const userblock_changes = {};
+			if (dirty & /*entry, dataColumn*/ 9) userblock_changes.input = /*entry*/ ctx[0][/*dataColumn*/ ctx[3]];
+			userblock.$set(userblock_changes);
+		},
+		i(local) {
+			if (current) return;
+			transition_in(userblock.$$.fragment, local);
+			current = true;
+		},
+		o(local) {
+			transition_out(userblock.$$.fragment, local);
+			current = false;
+		},
+		d(detaching) {
+			destroy_component(userblock, detaching);
+		}
+	};
+}
+
+// (30:42) 
+function create_if_block_6(ctx) {
+	let userblock;
+	let current;
+
+	userblock = new UserBlock({
+			props: { input: /*item*/ ctx[6]["content"] }
+		});
+
+	return {
+		c() {
+			create_component(userblock.$$.fragment);
+		},
+		l(nodes) {
+			claim_component(userblock.$$.fragment, nodes);
+		},
+		m(target, anchor) {
+			mount_component(userblock, target, anchor);
+			current = true;
+		},
+		p(ctx, dirty) {
+			const userblock_changes = {};
+			if (dirty & /*entry, dataColumn*/ 9) userblock_changes.input = /*item*/ ctx[6]["content"];
+			userblock.$set(userblock_changes);
+		},
+		i(local) {
+			if (current) return;
+			transition_in(userblock.$$.fragment, local);
+			current = true;
+		},
+		o(local) {
+			transition_out(userblock.$$.fragment, local);
+			current = false;
+		},
+		d(detaching) {
+			destroy_component(userblock, detaching);
+		}
+	};
+}
+
+// (28:47) 
+function create_if_block_5(ctx) {
+	let assistantblock;
+	let current;
+
+	assistantblock = new AssistantBlock({
+			props: { input: /*item*/ ctx[6]["content"] }
+		});
+
+	return {
+		c() {
+			create_component(assistantblock.$$.fragment);
+		},
+		l(nodes) {
+			claim_component(assistantblock.$$.fragment, nodes);
+		},
+		m(target, anchor) {
+			mount_component(assistantblock, target, anchor);
+			current = true;
+		},
+		p(ctx, dirty) {
+			const assistantblock_changes = {};
+			if (dirty & /*entry, dataColumn*/ 9) assistantblock_changes.input = /*item*/ ctx[6]["content"];
+			assistantblock.$set(assistantblock_changes);
+		},
+		i(local) {
+			if (current) return;
+			transition_in(assistantblock.$$.fragment, local);
+			current = true;
+		},
+		o(local) {
+			transition_out(assistantblock.$$.fragment, local);
+			current = false;
+		},
+		d(detaching) {
+			destroy_component(assistantblock, detaching);
+		}
+	};
+}
+
+// (26:8) {#if item["role"] === "system"}
+function create_if_block_4(ctx) {
+	let systemblock;
+	let current;
+
+	systemblock = new SystemBlock({
+			props: { input: /*item*/ ctx[6]["content"] }
+		});
+
+	return {
+		c() {
+			create_component(systemblock.$$.fragment);
+		},
+		l(nodes) {
+			claim_component(systemblock.$$.fragment, nodes);
+		},
+		m(target, anchor) {
+			mount_component(systemblock, target, anchor);
+			current = true;
+		},
+		p(ctx, dirty) {
+			const systemblock_changes = {};
+			if (dirty & /*entry, dataColumn*/ 9) systemblock_changes.input = /*item*/ ctx[6]["content"];
+			systemblock.$set(systemblock_changes);
+		},
+		i(local) {
+			if (current) return;
+			transition_in(systemblock.$$.fragment, local);
+			current = true;
+		},
+		o(local) {
+			transition_out(systemblock.$$.fragment, local);
+			current = false;
+		},
+		d(detaching) {
+			destroy_component(systemblock, detaching);
+		}
+	};
+}
+
+// (25:6) {#each entry[dataColumn] as item}
+function create_each_block(ctx) {
+	let current_block_type_index;
+	let if_block;
+	let if_block_anchor;
+	let current;
+	const if_block_creators = [create_if_block_4, create_if_block_5, create_if_block_6];
+	const if_blocks = [];
+
+	function select_block_type_1(ctx, dirty) {
+		if (/*item*/ ctx[6]["role"] === "system") return 0;
+		if (/*item*/ ctx[6]["role"] === "assistant") return 1;
+		if (/*item*/ ctx[6]["role"] === "user") return 2;
+		return -1;
+	}
+
+	if (~(current_block_type_index = select_block_type_1(ctx))) {
+		if_block = if_blocks[current_block_type_index] = if_block_creators[current_block_type_index](ctx);
+	}
+
+	return {
+		c() {
+			if (if_block) if_block.c();
+			if_block_anchor = empty();
+		},
+		l(nodes) {
+			if (if_block) if_block.l(nodes);
+			if_block_anchor = empty();
+		},
+		m(target, anchor) {
+			if (~current_block_type_index) {
+				if_blocks[current_block_type_index].m(target, anchor);
+			}
+
+			insert_hydration(target, if_block_anchor, anchor);
+			current = true;
+		},
+		p(ctx, dirty) {
+			let previous_block_index = current_block_type_index;
+			current_block_type_index = select_block_type_1(ctx);
+
+			if (current_block_type_index === previous_block_index) {
+				if (~current_block_type_index) {
+					if_blocks[current_block_type_index].p(ctx, dirty);
+				}
+			} else {
+				if (if_block) {
+					group_outros();
+
+					transition_out(if_blocks[previous_block_index], 1, 1, () => {
+						if_blocks[previous_block_index] = null;
+					});
+
+					check_outros();
+				}
+
+				if (~current_block_type_index) {
+					if_block = if_blocks[current_block_type_index];
+
+					if (!if_block) {
+						if_block = if_blocks[current_block_type_index] = if_block_creators[current_block_type_index](ctx);
+						if_block.c();
+					} else {
+						if_block.p(ctx, dirty);
+					}
+
+					transition_in(if_block, 1);
+					if_block.m(if_block_anchor.parentNode, if_block_anchor);
+				} else {
+					if_block = null;
+				}
+			}
+		},
+		i(local) {
+			if (current) return;
+			transition_in(if_block);
+			current = true;
+		},
+		o(local) {
+			transition_out(if_block);
+			current = false;
+		},
+		d(detaching) {
+			if (~current_block_type_index) {
+				if_blocks[current_block_type_index].d(detaching);
+			}
+
+			if (detaching) detach(if_block_anchor);
+		}
+	};
+}
+
+// (36:2) {#if entry[modelColumn]}
+function create_if_block_1(ctx) {
+	let assistantblock;
+	let current;
+
+	assistantblock = new AssistantBlock({
+			props: {
+				input: /*entry*/ ctx[0][/*modelColumn*/ ctx[1]],
+				output: true
+			}
+		});
+
+	return {
+		c() {
+			create_component(assistantblock.$$.fragment);
+		},
+		l(nodes) {
+			claim_component(assistantblock.$$.fragment, nodes);
+		},
+		m(target, anchor) {
+			mount_component(assistantblock, target, anchor);
+			current = true;
+		},
+		p(ctx, dirty) {
+			const assistantblock_changes = {};
+			if (dirty & /*entry, modelColumn*/ 3) assistantblock_changes.input = /*entry*/ ctx[0][/*modelColumn*/ ctx[1]];
+			assistantblock.$set(assistantblock_changes);
+		},
+		i(local) {
+			if (current) return;
+			transition_in(assistantblock.$$.fragment, local);
+			current = true;
+		},
+		o(local) {
+			transition_out(assistantblock.$$.fragment, local);
+			current = false;
+		},
+		d(detaching) {
+			destroy_component(assistantblock, detaching);
+		}
+	};
+}
+
+// (39:2) {#if entry[labelColumn]}
+function create_if_block(ctx) {
+	let p;
+	let span;
+	let t0;
+	let t1;
+	let t2_value = /*entry*/ ctx[0][/*labelColumn*/ ctx[2]] + "";
+	let t2;
+
+	return {
+		c() {
+			p = element("p");
+			span = element("span");
+			t0 = text("Expected:");
+			t1 = space();
+			t2 = text(t2_value);
+			this.h();
+		},
+		l(nodes) {
+			p = claim_element(nodes, "P", { class: true });
+			var p_nodes = children(p);
+			span = claim_element(p_nodes, "SPAN", { class: true });
+			var span_nodes = children(span);
+			t0 = claim_text(span_nodes, "Expected:");
+			span_nodes.forEach(detach);
+			t1 = claim_space(p_nodes);
+			t2 = claim_text(p_nodes, t2_value);
+			p_nodes.forEach(detach);
+			this.h();
+		},
+		h() {
+			attr(span, "class", "label svelte-eoma5v");
+			attr(p, "class", "svelte-eoma5v");
+		},
+		m(target, anchor) {
+			insert_hydration(target, p, anchor);
+			append_hydration(p, span);
+			append_hydration(span, t0);
+			append_hydration(p, t1);
+			append_hydration(p, t2);
+		},
+		p(ctx, dirty) {
+			if (dirty & /*entry, labelColumn*/ 5 && t2_value !== (t2_value = /*entry*/ ctx[0][/*labelColumn*/ ctx[2]] + "")) set_data(t2, t2_value);
+		},
+		d(detaching) {
+			if (detaching) detach(p);
+		}
+	};
+}
+
+function create_fragment(ctx) {
+	let div;
+	let t0;
+	let t1;
+	let current;
+	let if_block0 = /*entry*/ ctx[0][/*dataColumn*/ ctx[3]] && create_if_block_2(ctx);
+	let if_block1 = /*entry*/ ctx[0][/*modelColumn*/ ctx[1]] && create_if_block_1(ctx);
+	let if_block2 = /*entry*/ ctx[0][/*labelColumn*/ ctx[2]] && create_if_block(ctx);
+
+	return {
+		c() {
+			div = element("div");
+			if (if_block0) if_block0.c();
+			t0 = space();
+			if (if_block1) if_block1.c();
+			t1 = space();
+			if (if_block2) if_block2.c();
+			this.h();
+		},
+		l(nodes) {
+			div = claim_element(nodes, "DIV", { id: true, class: true });
+			var div_nodes = children(div);
+			if (if_block0) if_block0.l(div_nodes);
+			t0 = claim_space(div_nodes);
+			if (if_block1) if_block1.l(div_nodes);
+			t1 = claim_space(div_nodes);
+			if (if_block2) if_block2.l(div_nodes);
+			div_nodes.forEach(detach);
+			this.h();
+		},
+		h() {
+			attr(div, "id", "container");
+			attr(div, "class", "svelte-eoma5v");
+		},
+		m(target, anchor) {
+			insert_hydration(target, div, anchor);
+			if (if_block0) if_block0.m(div, null);
+			append_hydration(div, t0);
+			if (if_block1) if_block1.m(div, null);
+			append_hydration(div, t1);
+			if (if_block2) if_block2.m(div, null);
+			current = true;
+		},
+		p(ctx, [dirty]) {
+			if (/*entry*/ ctx[0][/*dataColumn*/ ctx[3]]) {
+				if (if_block0) {
+					if_block0.p(ctx, dirty);
+
+					if (dirty & /*entry, dataColumn*/ 9) {
+						transition_in(if_block0, 1);
+					}
+				} else {
+					if_block0 = create_if_block_2(ctx);
+					if_block0.c();
+					transition_in(if_block0, 1);
+					if_block0.m(div, t0);
+				}
+			} else if (if_block0) {
+				group_outros();
+
+				transition_out(if_block0, 1, 1, () => {
+					if_block0 = null;
+				});
+
+				check_outros();
+			}
+
+			if (/*entry*/ ctx[0][/*modelColumn*/ ctx[1]]) {
+				if (if_block1) {
+					if_block1.p(ctx, dirty);
+
+					if (dirty & /*entry, modelColumn*/ 3) {
+						transition_in(if_block1, 1);
+					}
+				} else {
+					if_block1 = create_if_block_1(ctx);
+					if_block1.c();
+					transition_in(if_block1, 1);
+					if_block1.m(div, t1);
+				}
+			} else if (if_block1) {
+				group_outros();
+
+				transition_out(if_block1, 1, 1, () => {
+					if_block1 = null;
+				});
+
+				check_outros();
+			}
+
+			if (/*entry*/ ctx[0][/*labelColumn*/ ctx[2]]) {
+				if (if_block2) {
+					if_block2.p(ctx, dirty);
+				} else {
+					if_block2 = create_if_block(ctx);
+					if_block2.c();
+					if_block2.m(div, null);
+				}
+			} else if (if_block2) {
+				if_block2.d(1);
+				if_block2 = null;
+			}
+		},
+		i(local) {
+			if (current) return;
+			transition_in(if_block0);
+			transition_in(if_block1);
+			current = true;
+		},
+		o(local) {
+			transition_out(if_block0);
+			transition_out(if_block1);
+			current = false;
+		},
+		d(detaching) {
+			if (detaching) detach(div);
+			if (if_block0) if_block0.d();
+			if (if_block1) if_block1.d();
+			if (if_block2) if_block2.d();
+		}
+	};
+}
+
+function instance($$self, $$props, $$invalidate) {
+	let { options } = $$props;
+	let { entry } = $$props;
+	let { modelColumn } = $$props;
+	let { labelColumn } = $$props;
+	let { dataColumn } = $$props;
+	let { idColumn } = $$props;
+
+	$$self.$$set = $$props => {
+		if ('options' in $$props) $$invalidate(4, options = $$props.options);
+		if ('entry' in $$props) $$invalidate(0, entry = $$props.entry);
+		if ('modelColumn' in $$props) $$invalidate(1, modelColumn = $$props.modelColumn);
+		if ('labelColumn' in $$props) $$invalidate(2, labelColumn = $$props.labelColumn);
+		if ('dataColumn' in $$props) $$invalidate(3, dataColumn = $$props.dataColumn);
+		if ('idColumn' in $$props) $$invalidate(5, idColumn = $$props.idColumn);
+	};
+
+	return [entry, modelColumn, labelColumn, dataColumn, options, idColumn];
+}
+
+class InstanceView extends SvelteComponent {
+	constructor(options) {
+		super();
+
+		init(
+			this,
+			options,
+			instance,
+			create_fragment,
+			safe_not_equal,
+			{
+				options: 4,
+				entry: 0,
+				modelColumn: 1,
+				labelColumn: 2,
+				dataColumn: 3,
+				idColumn: 5
+			},
+			add_css
+		);
+	}
+}
+
+function getInstance(
+  div,
+  viewOptions,
+  entry,
+  modelColumn,
+  labelColumn,
+  dataColumn,
+  idColumn
+) {
+  new InstanceView({
+    target: div,
+    props: {
+      entry: entry,
+      viewOptions: viewOptions,
+      modelColumn: modelColumn,
+      labelColumn: labelColumn,
+      dataColumn: dataColumn,
+      idColumn: idColumn,
+    },
+    hydrate: true,
+  });
+}
+
+// export function getOptions(div, setOptions) {
+//   new OptionsView({
+//     target: div,
+//     props: {
+//       setOptions,
+//     },
+//   });
+// }
+
+export { getInstance };
diff --git a/evals/.zeno_cache_logic/OUTPUTgpt-3_5-turbo.pickle b/evals/.zeno_cache_logic/OUTPUTgpt-3_5-turbo.pickle
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7ea7646a109ca67faa8e5a809b5707403b1d0be8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/evals/.zeno_cache_logic/OUTPUTgpt-3_5-turbo.pickle
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:e2d64320ff26ba332e8729fd38dec1ea5fd40b05117fbfa91af1063d3f21a5fb
+size 14176
diff --git a/evals/.zeno_cache_logic/OUTPUTgpt-4.pickle b/evals/.zeno_cache_logic/OUTPUTgpt-4.pickle
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e3a87ec0dc773208be9e06758550a98db344ee4d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/evals/.zeno_cache_logic/OUTPUTgpt-4.pickle
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:42e4a7c700e49719075c965cdc376ec7977e769543510bc4f1ab8450eda45b96
+size 14924
diff --git a/evals/.zeno_cache_logic/POSTDISTILLcorrectgpt-3_5-turbo.pickle b/evals/.zeno_cache_logic/POSTDISTILLcorrectgpt-3_5-turbo.pickle
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..90a3c75311a7a87f2ffbd91a6fbeb2911df55c45
--- /dev/null
+++ b/evals/.zeno_cache_logic/POSTDISTILLcorrectgpt-3_5-turbo.pickle
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:457d65ffcf25212437285af67f005ebc643ad5c052895c70b831510bc94a4a1e
+size 5475
diff --git a/evals/.zeno_cache_logic/POSTDISTILLcorrectgpt-4.pickle b/evals/.zeno_cache_logic/POSTDISTILLcorrectgpt-4.pickle
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..48536c146661edde2d5e4ab6f1ae6ba7a558b461
--- /dev/null
+++ b/evals/.zeno_cache_logic/POSTDISTILLcorrectgpt-4.pickle
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:826d7978a5a140f576ef8a09baa5e215534619b403efd4186a54eb136a8be8c0
+size 5467
diff --git a/evals/.zeno_cache_logic/folders.pickle b/evals/.zeno_cache_logic/folders.pickle
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6f61606d9f0ce6528f4adfd3ebe8da336629c1a1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/evals/.zeno_cache_logic/folders.pickle
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:ec0a6ccf9debf1c16781445c4b9106080d00478b0559469336db7c7b7b9711c8
+size 5
diff --git a/evals/.zeno_cache_logic/reports.pickle b/evals/.zeno_cache_logic/reports.pickle
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6f61606d9f0ce6528f4adfd3ebe8da336629c1a1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/evals/.zeno_cache_logic/reports.pickle
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:ec0a6ccf9debf1c16781445c4b9106080d00478b0559469336db7c7b7b9711c8
+size 5
diff --git a/evals/.zeno_cache_logic/view.mjs b/evals/.zeno_cache_logic/view.mjs
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a233ab94985094652cc8d8cde2fe6f8ff3f40793
--- /dev/null
+++ b/evals/.zeno_cache_logic/view.mjs
@@ -0,0 +1,1574 @@
+function noop() { }
+function run(fn) {
+    return fn();
+}
+function blank_object() {
+    return Object.create(null);
+}
+function run_all(fns) {
+    fns.forEach(run);
+}
+function is_function(thing) {
+    return typeof thing === 'function';
+}
+function safe_not_equal(a, b) {
+    return a != a ? b == b : a !== b || ((a && typeof a === 'object') || typeof a === 'function');
+}
+function is_empty(obj) {
+    return Object.keys(obj).length === 0;
+}
+function null_to_empty(value) {
+    return value == null ? '' : value;
+}
+
+// Track which nodes are claimed during hydration. Unclaimed nodes can then be removed from the DOM
+// at the end of hydration without touching the remaining nodes.
+let is_hydrating = false;
+function start_hydrating() {
+    is_hydrating = true;
+}
+function end_hydrating() {
+    is_hydrating = false;
+}
+function upper_bound(low, high, key, value) {
+    // Return first index of value larger than input value in the range [low, high)
+    while (low < high) {
+        const mid = low + ((high - low) >> 1);
+        if (key(mid) <= value) {
+            low = mid + 1;
+        }
+        else {
+            high = mid;
+        }
+    }
+    return low;
+}
+function init_hydrate(target) {
+    if (target.hydrate_init)
+        return;
+    target.hydrate_init = true;
+    // We know that all children have claim_order values since the unclaimed have been detached if target is not <head>
+    let children = target.childNodes;
+    // If target is <head>, there may be children without claim_order
+    if (target.nodeName === 'HEAD') {
+        const myChildren = [];
+        for (let i = 0; i < children.length; i++) {
+            const node = children[i];
+            if (node.claim_order !== undefined) {
+                myChildren.push(node);
+            }
+        }
+        children = myChildren;
+    }
+    /*
+    * Reorder claimed children optimally.
+    * We can reorder claimed children optimally by finding the longest subsequence of
+    * nodes that are already claimed in order and only moving the rest. The longest
+    * subsequence of nodes that are claimed in order can be found by
+    * computing the longest increasing subsequence of .claim_order values.
+    *
+    * This algorithm is optimal in generating the least amount of reorder operations
+    * possible.
+    *
+    * Proof:
+    * We know that, given a set of reordering operations, the nodes that do not move
+    * always form an increasing subsequence, since they do not move among each other
+    * meaning that they must be already ordered among each other. Thus, the maximal
+    * set of nodes that do not move form a longest increasing subsequence.
+    */
+    // Compute longest increasing subsequence
+    // m: subsequence length j => index k of smallest value that ends an increasing subsequence of length j
+    const m = new Int32Array(children.length + 1);
+    // Predecessor indices + 1
+    const p = new Int32Array(children.length);
+    m[0] = -1;
+    let longest = 0;
+    for (let i = 0; i < children.length; i++) {
+        const current = children[i].claim_order;
+        // Find the largest subsequence length such that it ends in a value less than our current value
+        // upper_bound returns first greater value, so we subtract one
+        // with fast path for when we are on the current longest subsequence
+        const seqLen = ((longest > 0 && children[m[longest]].claim_order <= current) ? longest + 1 : upper_bound(1, longest, idx => children[m[idx]].claim_order, current)) - 1;
+        p[i] = m[seqLen] + 1;
+        const newLen = seqLen + 1;
+        // We can guarantee that current is the smallest value. Otherwise, we would have generated a longer sequence.
+        m[newLen] = i;
+        longest = Math.max(newLen, longest);
+    }
+    // The longest increasing subsequence of nodes (initially reversed)
+    const lis = [];
+    // The rest of the nodes, nodes that will be moved
+    const toMove = [];
+    let last = children.length - 1;
+    for (let cur = m[longest] + 1; cur != 0; cur = p[cur - 1]) {
+        lis.push(children[cur - 1]);
+        for (; last >= cur; last--) {
+            toMove.push(children[last]);
+        }
+        last--;
+    }
+    for (; last >= 0; last--) {
+        toMove.push(children[last]);
+    }
+    lis.reverse();
+    // We sort the nodes being moved to guarantee that their insertion order matches the claim order
+    toMove.sort((a, b) => a.claim_order - b.claim_order);
+    // Finally, we move the nodes
+    for (let i = 0, j = 0; i < toMove.length; i++) {
+        while (j < lis.length && toMove[i].claim_order >= lis[j].claim_order) {
+            j++;
+        }
+        const anchor = j < lis.length ? lis[j] : null;
+        target.insertBefore(toMove[i], anchor);
+    }
+}
+function append(target, node) {
+    target.appendChild(node);
+}
+function append_styles(target, style_sheet_id, styles) {
+    const append_styles_to = get_root_for_style(target);
+    if (!append_styles_to.getElementById(style_sheet_id)) {
+        const style = element('style');
+        style.id = style_sheet_id;
+        style.textContent = styles;
+        append_stylesheet(append_styles_to, style);
+    }
+}
+function get_root_for_style(node) {
+    if (!node)
+        return document;
+    const root = node.getRootNode ? node.getRootNode() : node.ownerDocument;
+    if (root && root.host) {
+        return root;
+    }
+    return node.ownerDocument;
+}
+function append_stylesheet(node, style) {
+    append(node.head || node, style);
+    return style.sheet;
+}
+function append_hydration(target, node) {
+    if (is_hydrating) {
+        init_hydrate(target);
+        if ((target.actual_end_child === undefined) || ((target.actual_end_child !== null) && (target.actual_end_child.parentNode !== target))) {
+            target.actual_end_child = target.firstChild;
+        }
+        // Skip nodes of undefined ordering
+        while ((target.actual_end_child !== null) && (target.actual_end_child.claim_order === undefined)) {
+            target.actual_end_child = target.actual_end_child.nextSibling;
+        }
+        if (node !== target.actual_end_child) {
+            // We only insert if the ordering of this node should be modified or the parent node is not target
+            if (node.claim_order !== undefined || node.parentNode !== target) {
+                target.insertBefore(node, target.actual_end_child);
+            }
+        }
+        else {
+            target.actual_end_child = node.nextSibling;
+        }
+    }
+    else if (node.parentNode !== target || node.nextSibling !== null) {
+        target.appendChild(node);
+    }
+}
+function insert_hydration(target, node, anchor) {
+    if (is_hydrating && !anchor) {
+        append_hydration(target, node);
+    }
+    else if (node.parentNode !== target || node.nextSibling != anchor) {
+        target.insertBefore(node, anchor || null);
+    }
+}
+function detach(node) {
+    if (node.parentNode) {
+        node.parentNode.removeChild(node);
+    }
+}
+function destroy_each(iterations, detaching) {
+    for (let i = 0; i < iterations.length; i += 1) {
+        if (iterations[i])
+            iterations[i].d(detaching);
+    }
+}
+function element(name) {
+    return document.createElement(name);
+}
+function svg_element(name) {
+    return document.createElementNS('http://www.w3.org/2000/svg', name);
+}
+function text(data) {
+    return document.createTextNode(data);
+}
+function space() {
+    return text(' ');
+}
+function empty() {
+    return text('');
+}
+function attr(node, attribute, value) {
+    if (value == null)
+        node.removeAttribute(attribute);
+    else if (node.getAttribute(attribute) !== value)
+        node.setAttribute(attribute, value);
+}
+function children(element) {
+    return Array.from(element.childNodes);
+}
+function init_claim_info(nodes) {
+    if (nodes.claim_info === undefined) {
+        nodes.claim_info = { last_index: 0, total_claimed: 0 };
+    }
+}
+function claim_node(nodes, predicate, processNode, createNode, dontUpdateLastIndex = false) {
+    // Try to find nodes in an order such that we lengthen the longest increasing subsequence
+    init_claim_info(nodes);
+    const resultNode = (() => {
+        // We first try to find an element after the previous one
+        for (let i = nodes.claim_info.last_index; i < nodes.length; i++) {
+            const node = nodes[i];
+            if (predicate(node)) {
+                const replacement = processNode(node);
+                if (replacement === undefined) {
+                    nodes.splice(i, 1);
+                }
+                else {
+                    nodes[i] = replacement;
+                }
+                if (!dontUpdateLastIndex) {
+                    nodes.claim_info.last_index = i;
+                }
+                return node;
+            }
+        }
+        // Otherwise, we try to find one before
+        // We iterate in reverse so that we don't go too far back
+        for (let i = nodes.claim_info.last_index - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
+            const node = nodes[i];
+            if (predicate(node)) {
+                const replacement = processNode(node);
+                if (replacement === undefined) {
+                    nodes.splice(i, 1);
+                }
+                else {
+                    nodes[i] = replacement;
+                }
+                if (!dontUpdateLastIndex) {
+                    nodes.claim_info.last_index = i;
+                }
+                else if (replacement === undefined) {
+                    // Since we spliced before the last_index, we decrease it
+                    nodes.claim_info.last_index--;
+                }
+                return node;
+            }
+        }
+        // If we can't find any matching node, we create a new one
+        return createNode();
+    })();
+    resultNode.claim_order = nodes.claim_info.total_claimed;
+    nodes.claim_info.total_claimed += 1;
+    return resultNode;
+}
+function claim_element_base(nodes, name, attributes, create_element) {
+    return claim_node(nodes, (node) => node.nodeName === name, (node) => {
+        const remove = [];
+        for (let j = 0; j < node.attributes.length; j++) {
+            const attribute = node.attributes[j];
+            if (!attributes[attribute.name]) {
+                remove.push(attribute.name);
+            }
+        }
+        remove.forEach(v => node.removeAttribute(v));
+        return undefined;
+    }, () => create_element(name));
+}
+function claim_element(nodes, name, attributes) {
+    return claim_element_base(nodes, name, attributes, element);
+}
+function claim_svg_element(nodes, name, attributes) {
+    return claim_element_base(nodes, name, attributes, svg_element);
+}
+function claim_text(nodes, data) {
+    return claim_node(nodes, (node) => node.nodeType === 3, (node) => {
+        const dataStr = '' + data;
+        if (node.data.startsWith(dataStr)) {
+            if (node.data.length !== dataStr.length) {
+                return node.splitText(dataStr.length);
+            }
+        }
+        else {
+            node.data = dataStr;
+        }
+    }, () => text(data), true // Text nodes should not update last index since it is likely not worth it to eliminate an increasing subsequence of actual elements
+    );
+}
+function claim_space(nodes) {
+    return claim_text(nodes, ' ');
+}
+function set_data(text, data) {
+    data = '' + data;
+    if (text.wholeText !== data)
+        text.data = data;
+}
+
+let current_component;
+function set_current_component(component) {
+    current_component = component;
+}
+
+const dirty_components = [];
+const binding_callbacks = [];
+const render_callbacks = [];
+const flush_callbacks = [];
+const resolved_promise = Promise.resolve();
+let update_scheduled = false;
+function schedule_update() {
+    if (!update_scheduled) {
+        update_scheduled = true;
+        resolved_promise.then(flush);
+    }
+}
+function add_render_callback(fn) {
+    render_callbacks.push(fn);
+}
+// flush() calls callbacks in this order:
+// 1. All beforeUpdate callbacks, in order: parents before children
+// 2. All bind:this callbacks, in reverse order: children before parents.
+// 3. All afterUpdate callbacks, in order: parents before children. EXCEPT
+//    for afterUpdates called during the initial onMount, which are called in
+//    reverse order: children before parents.
+// Since callbacks might update component values, which could trigger another
+// call to flush(), the following steps guard against this:
+// 1. During beforeUpdate, any updated components will be added to the
+//    dirty_components array and will cause a reentrant call to flush(). Because
+//    the flush index is kept outside the function, the reentrant call will pick
+//    up where the earlier call left off and go through all dirty components. The
+//    current_component value is saved and restored so that the reentrant call will
+//    not interfere with the "parent" flush() call.
+// 2. bind:this callbacks cannot trigger new flush() calls.
+// 3. During afterUpdate, any updated components will NOT have their afterUpdate
+//    callback called a second time; the seen_callbacks set, outside the flush()
+//    function, guarantees this behavior.
+const seen_callbacks = new Set();
+let flushidx = 0; // Do *not* move this inside the flush() function
+function flush() {
+    // Do not reenter flush while dirty components are updated, as this can
+    // result in an infinite loop. Instead, let the inner flush handle it.
+    // Reentrancy is ok afterwards for bindings etc.
+    if (flushidx !== 0) {
+        return;
+    }
+    const saved_component = current_component;
+    do {
+        // first, call beforeUpdate functions
+        // and update components
+        try {
+            while (flushidx < dirty_components.length) {
+                const component = dirty_components[flushidx];
+                flushidx++;
+                set_current_component(component);
+                update(component.$$);
+            }
+        }
+        catch (e) {
+            // reset dirty state to not end up in a deadlocked state and then rethrow
+            dirty_components.length = 0;
+            flushidx = 0;
+            throw e;
+        }
+        set_current_component(null);
+        dirty_components.length = 0;
+        flushidx = 0;
+        while (binding_callbacks.length)
+            binding_callbacks.pop()();
+        // then, once components are updated, call
+        // afterUpdate functions. This may cause
+        // subsequent updates...
+        for (let i = 0; i < render_callbacks.length; i += 1) {
+            const callback = render_callbacks[i];
+            if (!seen_callbacks.has(callback)) {
+                // ...so guard against infinite loops
+                seen_callbacks.add(callback);
+                callback();
+            }
+        }
+        render_callbacks.length = 0;
+    } while (dirty_components.length);
+    while (flush_callbacks.length) {
+        flush_callbacks.pop()();
+    }
+    update_scheduled = false;
+    seen_callbacks.clear();
+    set_current_component(saved_component);
+}
+function update($$) {
+    if ($$.fragment !== null) {
+        $$.update();
+        run_all($$.before_update);
+        const dirty = $$.dirty;
+        $$.dirty = [-1];
+        $$.fragment && $$.fragment.p($$.ctx, dirty);
+        $$.after_update.forEach(add_render_callback);
+    }
+}
+const outroing = new Set();
+let outros;
+function group_outros() {
+    outros = {
+        r: 0,
+        c: [],
+        p: outros // parent group
+    };
+}
+function check_outros() {
+    if (!outros.r) {
+        run_all(outros.c);
+    }
+    outros = outros.p;
+}
+function transition_in(block, local) {
+    if (block && block.i) {
+        outroing.delete(block);
+        block.i(local);
+    }
+}
+function transition_out(block, local, detach, callback) {
+    if (block && block.o) {
+        if (outroing.has(block))
+            return;
+        outroing.add(block);
+        outros.c.push(() => {
+            outroing.delete(block);
+            if (callback) {
+                if (detach)
+                    block.d(1);
+                callback();
+            }
+        });
+        block.o(local);
+    }
+    else if (callback) {
+        callback();
+    }
+}
+function create_component(block) {
+    block && block.c();
+}
+function claim_component(block, parent_nodes) {
+    block && block.l(parent_nodes);
+}
+function mount_component(component, target, anchor, customElement) {
+    const { fragment, after_update } = component.$$;
+    fragment && fragment.m(target, anchor);
+    if (!customElement) {
+        // onMount happens before the initial afterUpdate
+        add_render_callback(() => {
+            const new_on_destroy = component.$$.on_mount.map(run).filter(is_function);
+            // if the component was destroyed immediately
+            // it will update the `$$.on_destroy` reference to `null`.
+            // the destructured on_destroy may still reference to the old array
+            if (component.$$.on_destroy) {
+                component.$$.on_destroy.push(...new_on_destroy);
+            }
+            else {
+                // Edge case - component was destroyed immediately,
+                // most likely as a result of a binding initialising
+                run_all(new_on_destroy);
+            }
+            component.$$.on_mount = [];
+        });
+    }
+    after_update.forEach(add_render_callback);
+}
+function destroy_component(component, detaching) {
+    const $$ = component.$$;
+    if ($$.fragment !== null) {
+        run_all($$.on_destroy);
+        $$.fragment && $$.fragment.d(detaching);
+        // TODO null out other refs, including component.$$ (but need to
+        // preserve final state?)
+        $$.on_destroy = $$.fragment = null;
+        $$.ctx = [];
+    }
+}
+function make_dirty(component, i) {
+    if (component.$$.dirty[0] === -1) {
+        dirty_components.push(component);
+        schedule_update();
+        component.$$.dirty.fill(0);
+    }
+    component.$$.dirty[(i / 31) | 0] |= (1 << (i % 31));
+}
+function init(component, options, instance, create_fragment, not_equal, props, append_styles, dirty = [-1]) {
+    const parent_component = current_component;
+    set_current_component(component);
+    const $$ = component.$$ = {
+        fragment: null,
+        ctx: [],
+        // state
+        props,
+        update: noop,
+        not_equal,
+        bound: blank_object(),
+        // lifecycle
+        on_mount: [],
+        on_destroy: [],
+        on_disconnect: [],
+        before_update: [],
+        after_update: [],
+        context: new Map(options.context || (parent_component ? parent_component.$$.context : [])),
+        // everything else
+        callbacks: blank_object(),
+        dirty,
+        skip_bound: false,
+        root: options.target || parent_component.$$.root
+    };
+    append_styles && append_styles($$.root);
+    let ready = false;
+    $$.ctx = instance
+        ? instance(component, options.props || {}, (i, ret, ...rest) => {
+            const value = rest.length ? rest[0] : ret;
+            if ($$.ctx && not_equal($$.ctx[i], $$.ctx[i] = value)) {
+                if (!$$.skip_bound && $$.bound[i])
+                    $$.bound[i](value);
+                if (ready)
+                    make_dirty(component, i);
+            }
+            return ret;
+        })
+        : [];
+    $$.update();
+    ready = true;
+    run_all($$.before_update);
+    // `false` as a special case of no DOM component
+    $$.fragment = create_fragment ? create_fragment($$.ctx) : false;
+    if (options.target) {
+        if (options.hydrate) {
+            start_hydrating();
+            const nodes = children(options.target);
+            // eslint-disable-next-line @typescript-eslint/no-non-null-assertion
+            $$.fragment && $$.fragment.l(nodes);
+            nodes.forEach(detach);
+        }
+        else {
+            // eslint-disable-next-line @typescript-eslint/no-non-null-assertion
+            $$.fragment && $$.fragment.c();
+        }
+        if (options.intro)
+            transition_in(component.$$.fragment);
+        mount_component(component, options.target, options.anchor, options.customElement);
+        end_hydrating();
+        flush();
+    }
+    set_current_component(parent_component);
+}
+/**
+ * Base class for Svelte components. Used when dev=false.
+ */
+class SvelteComponent {
+    $destroy() {
+        destroy_component(this, 1);
+        this.$destroy = noop;
+    }
+    $on(type, callback) {
+        if (!is_function(callback)) {
+            return noop;
+        }
+        const callbacks = (this.$$.callbacks[type] || (this.$$.callbacks[type] = []));
+        callbacks.push(callback);
+        return () => {
+            const index = callbacks.indexOf(callback);
+            if (index !== -1)
+                callbacks.splice(index, 1);
+        };
+    }
+    $set($$props) {
+        if (this.$$set && !is_empty($$props)) {
+            this.$$.skip_bound = true;
+            this.$$set($$props);
+            this.$$.skip_bound = false;
+        }
+    }
+}
+
+/* src/AssistantBlock.svelte generated by Svelte v3.55.1 */
+
+function add_css$3(target) {
+	append_styles(target, "svelte-1e3mbn4", ".model.svelte-1e3mbn4.svelte-1e3mbn4{fill:var(--logo)}.no-model.svelte-1e3mbn4.svelte-1e3mbn4{fill:var(--G3)}.model-border.svelte-1e3mbn4.svelte-1e3mbn4{border:1px solid var(--logo)}.no-model-border.svelte-1e3mbn4.svelte-1e3mbn4{border:1px solid rgba(224, 224, 224, 1)}.box.svelte-1e3mbn4.svelte-1e3mbn4{margin-top:10px;margin-bottom:10px;display:flex;align-items:start}.box.svelte-1e3mbn4 svg.svelte-1e3mbn4{min-width:24px;width:24px;margin-right:10px;margin-top:7px}.chat.svelte-1e3mbn4.svelte-1e3mbn4{border-radius:5px;margin:0px;padding:10px;overflow-wrap:anywhere}");
+}
+
+function create_fragment$3(ctx) {
+	let div;
+	let svg;
+	let path;
+	let svg_class_value;
+	let t0;
+	let p;
+	let t1;
+	let p_class_value;
+
+	return {
+		c() {
+			div = element("div");
+			svg = svg_element("svg");
+			path = svg_element("path");
+			t0 = space();
+			p = element("p");
+			t1 = text(/*input*/ ctx[0]);
+			this.h();
+		},
+		l(nodes) {
+			div = claim_element(nodes, "DIV", { class: true });
+			var div_nodes = children(div);
+			svg = claim_svg_element(div_nodes, "svg", { xmlns: true, viewBox: true, class: true });
+			var svg_nodes = children(svg);
+			path = claim_svg_element(svg_nodes, "path", { d: true });
+			children(path).forEach(detach);
+			svg_nodes.forEach(detach);
+			t0 = claim_space(div_nodes);
+			p = claim_element(div_nodes, "P", { class: true });
+			var p_nodes = children(p);
+			t1 = claim_text(p_nodes, /*input*/ ctx[0]);
+			p_nodes.forEach(detach);
+			div_nodes.forEach(detach);
+			this.h();
+		},
+		h() {
+			attr(path, "d", "M320 0c17.7 0 32 14.3 32 32V96H472c39.8 0 72 32.2 72 72V440c0 39.8-32.2 72-72 72H168c-39.8 0-72-32.2-72-72V168c0-39.8 32.2-72 72-72H288V32c0-17.7 14.3-32 32-32zM208 384c-8.8 0-16 7.2-16 16s7.2 16 16 16h32c8.8 0 16-7.2 16-16s-7.2-16-16-16H208zm96 0c-8.8 0-16 7.2-16 16s7.2 16 16 16h32c8.8 0 16-7.2 16-16s-7.2-16-16-16H304zm96 0c-8.8 0-16 7.2-16 16s7.2 16 16 16h32c8.8 0 16-7.2 16-16s-7.2-16-16-16H400zM264 256a40 40 0 1 0 -80 0 40 40 0 1 0 80 0zm152 40a40 40 0 1 0 0-80 40 40 0 1 0 0 80zM48 224H64V416H48c-26.5 0-48-21.5-48-48V272c0-26.5 21.5-48 48-48zm544 0c26.5 0 48 21.5 48 48v96c0 26.5-21.5 48-48 48H576V224h16z");
+			attr(svg, "xmlns", "http://www.w3.org/2000/svg");
+			attr(svg, "viewBox", "0 0 640 512");
+			attr(svg, "class", svg_class_value = "" + (null_to_empty(/*output*/ ctx[1] ? "model" : "no-model") + " svelte-1e3mbn4"));
+			attr(p, "class", p_class_value = "chat " + (/*output*/ ctx[1] ? 'model-border' : 'no-model-border') + " svelte-1e3mbn4");
+			attr(div, "class", "box svelte-1e3mbn4");
+		},
+		m(target, anchor) {
+			insert_hydration(target, div, anchor);
+			append_hydration(div, svg);
+			append_hydration(svg, path);
+			append_hydration(div, t0);
+			append_hydration(div, p);
+			append_hydration(p, t1);
+		},
+		p(ctx, [dirty]) {
+			if (dirty & /*output*/ 2 && svg_class_value !== (svg_class_value = "" + (null_to_empty(/*output*/ ctx[1] ? "model" : "no-model") + " svelte-1e3mbn4"))) {
+				attr(svg, "class", svg_class_value);
+			}
+
+			if (dirty & /*input*/ 1) set_data(t1, /*input*/ ctx[0]);
+
+			if (dirty & /*output*/ 2 && p_class_value !== (p_class_value = "chat " + (/*output*/ ctx[1] ? 'model-border' : 'no-model-border') + " svelte-1e3mbn4")) {
+				attr(p, "class", p_class_value);
+			}
+		},
+		i: noop,
+		o: noop,
+		d(detaching) {
+			if (detaching) detach(div);
+		}
+	};
+}
+
+function instance$3($$self, $$props, $$invalidate) {
+	let { input } = $$props;
+	let { output = false } = $$props;
+
+	$$self.$$set = $$props => {
+		if ('input' in $$props) $$invalidate(0, input = $$props.input);
+		if ('output' in $$props) $$invalidate(1, output = $$props.output);
+	};
+
+	return [input, output];
+}
+
+class AssistantBlock extends SvelteComponent {
+	constructor(options) {
+		super();
+		init(this, options, instance$3, create_fragment$3, safe_not_equal, { input: 0, output: 1 }, add_css$3);
+	}
+}
+
+/* src/SystemBlock.svelte generated by Svelte v3.55.1 */
+
+function add_css$2(target) {
+	append_styles(target, "svelte-18o0ab2", "p.svelte-18o0ab2{margin:0px}");
+}
+
+function create_fragment$2(ctx) {
+	let p;
+	let b;
+	let t0;
+	let t1;
+	let span;
+	let t2;
+
+	return {
+		c() {
+			p = element("p");
+			b = element("b");
+			t0 = text("System:");
+			t1 = space();
+			span = element("span");
+			t2 = text(/*input*/ ctx[0]);
+			this.h();
+		},
+		l(nodes) {
+			p = claim_element(nodes, "P", { class: true });
+			var p_nodes = children(p);
+			b = claim_element(p_nodes, "B", {});
+			var b_nodes = children(b);
+			t0 = claim_text(b_nodes, "System:");
+			b_nodes.forEach(detach);
+			t1 = claim_space(p_nodes);
+			span = claim_element(p_nodes, "SPAN", {});
+			var span_nodes = children(span);
+			t2 = claim_text(span_nodes, /*input*/ ctx[0]);
+			span_nodes.forEach(detach);
+			p_nodes.forEach(detach);
+			this.h();
+		},
+		h() {
+			attr(p, "class", "svelte-18o0ab2");
+		},
+		m(target, anchor) {
+			insert_hydration(target, p, anchor);
+			append_hydration(p, b);
+			append_hydration(b, t0);
+			append_hydration(p, t1);
+			append_hydration(p, span);
+			append_hydration(span, t2);
+		},
+		p(ctx, [dirty]) {
+			if (dirty & /*input*/ 1) set_data(t2, /*input*/ ctx[0]);
+		},
+		i: noop,
+		o: noop,
+		d(detaching) {
+			if (detaching) detach(p);
+		}
+	};
+}
+
+function instance$2($$self, $$props, $$invalidate) {
+	let { input } = $$props;
+
+	$$self.$$set = $$props => {
+		if ('input' in $$props) $$invalidate(0, input = $$props.input);
+	};
+
+	return [input];
+}
+
+class SystemBlock extends SvelteComponent {
+	constructor(options) {
+		super();
+		init(this, options, instance$2, create_fragment$2, safe_not_equal, { input: 0 }, add_css$2);
+	}
+}
+
+/* src/UserBlock.svelte generated by Svelte v3.55.1 */
+
+function add_css$1(target) {
+	append_styles(target, "svelte-1lys9p1", ".box.svelte-1lys9p1.svelte-1lys9p1{margin-top:10px;margin-bottom:10px;display:flex;align-items:start}.box.svelte-1lys9p1 svg.svelte-1lys9p1{min-width:24px;width:24px;margin-right:10px;margin-top:7px;fill:var(--G3)}.chat.svelte-1lys9p1.svelte-1lys9p1{border:1px solid rgba(224, 224, 224, 1);border-radius:5px;margin:0px;padding:10px;overflow-wrap:anywhere}");
+}
+
+function create_fragment$1(ctx) {
+	let div;
+	let svg;
+	let path;
+	let t0;
+	let p;
+	let t1;
+
+	return {
+		c() {
+			div = element("div");
+			svg = svg_element("svg");
+			path = svg_element("path");
+			t0 = space();
+			p = element("p");
+			t1 = text(/*input*/ ctx[0]);
+			this.h();
+		},
+		l(nodes) {
+			div = claim_element(nodes, "DIV", { class: true });
+			var div_nodes = children(div);
+			svg = claim_svg_element(div_nodes, "svg", { xmlns: true, viewBox: true, class: true });
+			var svg_nodes = children(svg);
+			path = claim_svg_element(svg_nodes, "path", { d: true });
+			children(path).forEach(detach);
+			svg_nodes.forEach(detach);
+			t0 = claim_space(div_nodes);
+			p = claim_element(div_nodes, "P", { class: true });
+			var p_nodes = children(p);
+			t1 = claim_text(p_nodes, /*input*/ ctx[0]);
+			p_nodes.forEach(detach);
+			div_nodes.forEach(detach);
+			this.h();
+		},
+		h() {
+			attr(path, "d", "M224 256A128 128 0 1 0 224 0a128 128 0 1 0 0 256zm-45.7 48C79.8 304 0 383.8 0 482.3C0 498.7 13.3 512 29.7 512H418.3c16.4 0 29.7-13.3 29.7-29.7C448 383.8 368.2 304 269.7 304H178.3z");
+			attr(svg, "xmlns", "http://www.w3.org/2000/svg");
+			attr(svg, "viewBox", "0 0 448 512");
+			attr(svg, "class", "svelte-1lys9p1");
+			attr(p, "class", "chat svelte-1lys9p1");
+			attr(div, "class", "box svelte-1lys9p1");
+		},
+		m(target, anchor) {
+			insert_hydration(target, div, anchor);
+			append_hydration(div, svg);
+			append_hydration(svg, path);
+			append_hydration(div, t0);
+			append_hydration(div, p);
+			append_hydration(p, t1);
+		},
+		p(ctx, [dirty]) {
+			if (dirty & /*input*/ 1) set_data(t1, /*input*/ ctx[0]);
+		},
+		i: noop,
+		o: noop,
+		d(detaching) {
+			if (detaching) detach(div);
+		}
+	};
+}
+
+function instance$1($$self, $$props, $$invalidate) {
+	let { input } = $$props;
+
+	$$self.$$set = $$props => {
+		if ('input' in $$props) $$invalidate(0, input = $$props.input);
+	};
+
+	return [input];
+}
+
+class UserBlock extends SvelteComponent {
+	constructor(options) {
+		super();
+		init(this, options, instance$1, create_fragment$1, safe_not_equal, { input: 0 }, add_css$1);
+	}
+}
+
+/* src/InstanceView.svelte generated by Svelte v3.55.1 */
+
+function add_css(target) {
+	append_styles(target, "svelte-eoma5v", "#container.svelte-eoma5v{border:0.5px solid rgb(224, 224, 224);min-width:350px;border-radius:2px;padding:10px}.label.svelte-eoma5v{margin-right:5px;font-weight:700}p.svelte-eoma5v{margin:5px;overflow-wrap:anywhere}");
+}
+
+function get_each_context(ctx, list, i) {
+	const child_ctx = ctx.slice();
+	child_ctx[6] = list[i];
+	return child_ctx;
+}
+
+// (21:2) {#if entry[dataColumn]}
+function create_if_block_2(ctx) {
+	let current_block_type_index;
+	let if_block;
+	let if_block_anchor;
+	let current;
+	const if_block_creators = [create_if_block_3, create_else_block];
+	const if_blocks = [];
+
+	function select_block_type(ctx, dirty) {
+		if (typeof /*entry*/ ctx[0][/*dataColumn*/ ctx[3]] === "string") return 0;
+		return 1;
+	}
+
+	current_block_type_index = select_block_type(ctx);
+	if_block = if_blocks[current_block_type_index] = if_block_creators[current_block_type_index](ctx);
+
+	return {
+		c() {
+			if_block.c();
+			if_block_anchor = empty();
+		},
+		l(nodes) {
+			if_block.l(nodes);
+			if_block_anchor = empty();
+		},
+		m(target, anchor) {
+			if_blocks[current_block_type_index].m(target, anchor);
+			insert_hydration(target, if_block_anchor, anchor);
+			current = true;
+		},
+		p(ctx, dirty) {
+			let previous_block_index = current_block_type_index;
+			current_block_type_index = select_block_type(ctx);
+
+			if (current_block_type_index === previous_block_index) {
+				if_blocks[current_block_type_index].p(ctx, dirty);
+			} else {
+				group_outros();
+
+				transition_out(if_blocks[previous_block_index], 1, 1, () => {
+					if_blocks[previous_block_index] = null;
+				});
+
+				check_outros();
+				if_block = if_blocks[current_block_type_index];
+
+				if (!if_block) {
+					if_block = if_blocks[current_block_type_index] = if_block_creators[current_block_type_index](ctx);
+					if_block.c();
+				} else {
+					if_block.p(ctx, dirty);
+				}
+
+				transition_in(if_block, 1);
+				if_block.m(if_block_anchor.parentNode, if_block_anchor);
+			}
+		},
+		i(local) {
+			if (current) return;
+			transition_in(if_block);
+			current = true;
+		},
+		o(local) {
+			transition_out(if_block);
+			current = false;
+		},
+		d(detaching) {
+			if_blocks[current_block_type_index].d(detaching);
+			if (detaching) detach(if_block_anchor);
+		}
+	};
+}
+
+// (24:4) {:else}
+function create_else_block(ctx) {
+	let each_1_anchor;
+	let current;
+	let each_value = /*entry*/ ctx[0][/*dataColumn*/ ctx[3]];
+	let each_blocks = [];
+
+	for (let i = 0; i < each_value.length; i += 1) {
+		each_blocks[i] = create_each_block(get_each_context(ctx, each_value, i));
+	}
+
+	const out = i => transition_out(each_blocks[i], 1, 1, () => {
+		each_blocks[i] = null;
+	});
+
+	return {
+		c() {
+			for (let i = 0; i < each_blocks.length; i += 1) {
+				each_blocks[i].c();
+			}
+
+			each_1_anchor = empty();
+		},
+		l(nodes) {
+			for (let i = 0; i < each_blocks.length; i += 1) {
+				each_blocks[i].l(nodes);
+			}
+
+			each_1_anchor = empty();
+		},
+		m(target, anchor) {
+			for (let i = 0; i < each_blocks.length; i += 1) {
+				each_blocks[i].m(target, anchor);
+			}
+
+			insert_hydration(target, each_1_anchor, anchor);
+			current = true;
+		},
+		p(ctx, dirty) {
+			if (dirty & /*entry, dataColumn*/ 9) {
+				each_value = /*entry*/ ctx[0][/*dataColumn*/ ctx[3]];
+				let i;
+
+				for (i = 0; i < each_value.length; i += 1) {
+					const child_ctx = get_each_context(ctx, each_value, i);
+
+					if (each_blocks[i]) {
+						each_blocks[i].p(child_ctx, dirty);
+						transition_in(each_blocks[i], 1);
+					} else {
+						each_blocks[i] = create_each_block(child_ctx);
+						each_blocks[i].c();
+						transition_in(each_blocks[i], 1);
+						each_blocks[i].m(each_1_anchor.parentNode, each_1_anchor);
+					}
+				}
+
+				group_outros();
+
+				for (i = each_value.length; i < each_blocks.length; i += 1) {
+					out(i);
+				}
+
+				check_outros();
+			}
+		},
+		i(local) {
+			if (current) return;
+
+			for (let i = 0; i < each_value.length; i += 1) {
+				transition_in(each_blocks[i]);
+			}
+
+			current = true;
+		},
+		o(local) {
+			each_blocks = each_blocks.filter(Boolean);
+
+			for (let i = 0; i < each_blocks.length; i += 1) {
+				transition_out(each_blocks[i]);
+			}
+
+			current = false;
+		},
+		d(detaching) {
+			destroy_each(each_blocks, detaching);
+			if (detaching) detach(each_1_anchor);
+		}
+	};
+}
+
+// (22:4) {#if typeof entry[dataColumn] === "string"}
+function create_if_block_3(ctx) {
+	let userblock;
+	let current;
+
+	userblock = new UserBlock({
+			props: {
+				input: /*entry*/ ctx[0][/*dataColumn*/ ctx[3]]
+			}
+		});
+
+	return {
+		c() {
+			create_component(userblock.$$.fragment);
+		},
+		l(nodes) {
+			claim_component(userblock.$$.fragment, nodes);
+		},
+		m(target, anchor) {
+			mount_component(userblock, target, anchor);
+			current = true;
+		},
+		p(ctx, dirty) {
+			const userblock_changes = {};
+			if (dirty & /*entry, dataColumn*/ 9) userblock_changes.input = /*entry*/ ctx[0][/*dataColumn*/ ctx[3]];
+			userblock.$set(userblock_changes);
+		},
+		i(local) {
+			if (current) return;
+			transition_in(userblock.$$.fragment, local);
+			current = true;
+		},
+		o(local) {
+			transition_out(userblock.$$.fragment, local);
+			current = false;
+		},
+		d(detaching) {
+			destroy_component(userblock, detaching);
+		}
+	};
+}
+
+// (30:42) 
+function create_if_block_6(ctx) {
+	let userblock;
+	let current;
+
+	userblock = new UserBlock({
+			props: { input: /*item*/ ctx[6]["content"] }
+		});
+
+	return {
+		c() {
+			create_component(userblock.$$.fragment);
+		},
+		l(nodes) {
+			claim_component(userblock.$$.fragment, nodes);
+		},
+		m(target, anchor) {
+			mount_component(userblock, target, anchor);
+			current = true;
+		},
+		p(ctx, dirty) {
+			const userblock_changes = {};
+			if (dirty & /*entry, dataColumn*/ 9) userblock_changes.input = /*item*/ ctx[6]["content"];
+			userblock.$set(userblock_changes);
+		},
+		i(local) {
+			if (current) return;
+			transition_in(userblock.$$.fragment, local);
+			current = true;
+		},
+		o(local) {
+			transition_out(userblock.$$.fragment, local);
+			current = false;
+		},
+		d(detaching) {
+			destroy_component(userblock, detaching);
+		}
+	};
+}
+
+// (28:47) 
+function create_if_block_5(ctx) {
+	let assistantblock;
+	let current;
+
+	assistantblock = new AssistantBlock({
+			props: { input: /*item*/ ctx[6]["content"] }
+		});
+
+	return {
+		c() {
+			create_component(assistantblock.$$.fragment);
+		},
+		l(nodes) {
+			claim_component(assistantblock.$$.fragment, nodes);
+		},
+		m(target, anchor) {
+			mount_component(assistantblock, target, anchor);
+			current = true;
+		},
+		p(ctx, dirty) {
+			const assistantblock_changes = {};
+			if (dirty & /*entry, dataColumn*/ 9) assistantblock_changes.input = /*item*/ ctx[6]["content"];
+			assistantblock.$set(assistantblock_changes);
+		},
+		i(local) {
+			if (current) return;
+			transition_in(assistantblock.$$.fragment, local);
+			current = true;
+		},
+		o(local) {
+			transition_out(assistantblock.$$.fragment, local);
+			current = false;
+		},
+		d(detaching) {
+			destroy_component(assistantblock, detaching);
+		}
+	};
+}
+
+// (26:8) {#if item["role"] === "system"}
+function create_if_block_4(ctx) {
+	let systemblock;
+	let current;
+
+	systemblock = new SystemBlock({
+			props: { input: /*item*/ ctx[6]["content"] }
+		});
+
+	return {
+		c() {
+			create_component(systemblock.$$.fragment);
+		},
+		l(nodes) {
+			claim_component(systemblock.$$.fragment, nodes);
+		},
+		m(target, anchor) {
+			mount_component(systemblock, target, anchor);
+			current = true;
+		},
+		p(ctx, dirty) {
+			const systemblock_changes = {};
+			if (dirty & /*entry, dataColumn*/ 9) systemblock_changes.input = /*item*/ ctx[6]["content"];
+			systemblock.$set(systemblock_changes);
+		},
+		i(local) {
+			if (current) return;
+			transition_in(systemblock.$$.fragment, local);
+			current = true;
+		},
+		o(local) {
+			transition_out(systemblock.$$.fragment, local);
+			current = false;
+		},
+		d(detaching) {
+			destroy_component(systemblock, detaching);
+		}
+	};
+}
+
+// (25:6) {#each entry[dataColumn] as item}
+function create_each_block(ctx) {
+	let current_block_type_index;
+	let if_block;
+	let if_block_anchor;
+	let current;
+	const if_block_creators = [create_if_block_4, create_if_block_5, create_if_block_6];
+	const if_blocks = [];
+
+	function select_block_type_1(ctx, dirty) {
+		if (/*item*/ ctx[6]["role"] === "system") return 0;
+		if (/*item*/ ctx[6]["role"] === "assistant") return 1;
+		if (/*item*/ ctx[6]["role"] === "user") return 2;
+		return -1;
+	}
+
+	if (~(current_block_type_index = select_block_type_1(ctx))) {
+		if_block = if_blocks[current_block_type_index] = if_block_creators[current_block_type_index](ctx);
+	}
+
+	return {
+		c() {
+			if (if_block) if_block.c();
+			if_block_anchor = empty();
+		},
+		l(nodes) {
+			if (if_block) if_block.l(nodes);
+			if_block_anchor = empty();
+		},
+		m(target, anchor) {
+			if (~current_block_type_index) {
+				if_blocks[current_block_type_index].m(target, anchor);
+			}
+
+			insert_hydration(target, if_block_anchor, anchor);
+			current = true;
+		},
+		p(ctx, dirty) {
+			let previous_block_index = current_block_type_index;
+			current_block_type_index = select_block_type_1(ctx);
+
+			if (current_block_type_index === previous_block_index) {
+				if (~current_block_type_index) {
+					if_blocks[current_block_type_index].p(ctx, dirty);
+				}
+			} else {
+				if (if_block) {
+					group_outros();
+
+					transition_out(if_blocks[previous_block_index], 1, 1, () => {
+						if_blocks[previous_block_index] = null;
+					});
+
+					check_outros();
+				}
+
+				if (~current_block_type_index) {
+					if_block = if_blocks[current_block_type_index];
+
+					if (!if_block) {
+						if_block = if_blocks[current_block_type_index] = if_block_creators[current_block_type_index](ctx);
+						if_block.c();
+					} else {
+						if_block.p(ctx, dirty);
+					}
+
+					transition_in(if_block, 1);
+					if_block.m(if_block_anchor.parentNode, if_block_anchor);
+				} else {
+					if_block = null;
+				}
+			}
+		},
+		i(local) {
+			if (current) return;
+			transition_in(if_block);
+			current = true;
+		},
+		o(local) {
+			transition_out(if_block);
+			current = false;
+		},
+		d(detaching) {
+			if (~current_block_type_index) {
+				if_blocks[current_block_type_index].d(detaching);
+			}
+
+			if (detaching) detach(if_block_anchor);
+		}
+	};
+}
+
+// (36:2) {#if entry[modelColumn]}
+function create_if_block_1(ctx) {
+	let assistantblock;
+	let current;
+
+	assistantblock = new AssistantBlock({
+			props: {
+				input: /*entry*/ ctx[0][/*modelColumn*/ ctx[1]],
+				output: true
+			}
+		});
+
+	return {
+		c() {
+			create_component(assistantblock.$$.fragment);
+		},
+		l(nodes) {
+			claim_component(assistantblock.$$.fragment, nodes);
+		},
+		m(target, anchor) {
+			mount_component(assistantblock, target, anchor);
+			current = true;
+		},
+		p(ctx, dirty) {
+			const assistantblock_changes = {};
+			if (dirty & /*entry, modelColumn*/ 3) assistantblock_changes.input = /*entry*/ ctx[0][/*modelColumn*/ ctx[1]];
+			assistantblock.$set(assistantblock_changes);
+		},
+		i(local) {
+			if (current) return;
+			transition_in(assistantblock.$$.fragment, local);
+			current = true;
+		},
+		o(local) {
+			transition_out(assistantblock.$$.fragment, local);
+			current = false;
+		},
+		d(detaching) {
+			destroy_component(assistantblock, detaching);
+		}
+	};
+}
+
+// (39:2) {#if entry[labelColumn]}
+function create_if_block(ctx) {
+	let p;
+	let span;
+	let t0;
+	let t1;
+	let t2_value = /*entry*/ ctx[0][/*labelColumn*/ ctx[2]] + "";
+	let t2;
+
+	return {
+		c() {
+			p = element("p");
+			span = element("span");
+			t0 = text("Expected:");
+			t1 = space();
+			t2 = text(t2_value);
+			this.h();
+		},
+		l(nodes) {
+			p = claim_element(nodes, "P", { class: true });
+			var p_nodes = children(p);
+			span = claim_element(p_nodes, "SPAN", { class: true });
+			var span_nodes = children(span);
+			t0 = claim_text(span_nodes, "Expected:");
+			span_nodes.forEach(detach);
+			t1 = claim_space(p_nodes);
+			t2 = claim_text(p_nodes, t2_value);
+			p_nodes.forEach(detach);
+			this.h();
+		},
+		h() {
+			attr(span, "class", "label svelte-eoma5v");
+			attr(p, "class", "svelte-eoma5v");
+		},
+		m(target, anchor) {
+			insert_hydration(target, p, anchor);
+			append_hydration(p, span);
+			append_hydration(span, t0);
+			append_hydration(p, t1);
+			append_hydration(p, t2);
+		},
+		p(ctx, dirty) {
+			if (dirty & /*entry, labelColumn*/ 5 && t2_value !== (t2_value = /*entry*/ ctx[0][/*labelColumn*/ ctx[2]] + "")) set_data(t2, t2_value);
+		},
+		d(detaching) {
+			if (detaching) detach(p);
+		}
+	};
+}
+
+function create_fragment(ctx) {
+	let div;
+	let t0;
+	let t1;
+	let current;
+	let if_block0 = /*entry*/ ctx[0][/*dataColumn*/ ctx[3]] && create_if_block_2(ctx);
+	let if_block1 = /*entry*/ ctx[0][/*modelColumn*/ ctx[1]] && create_if_block_1(ctx);
+	let if_block2 = /*entry*/ ctx[0][/*labelColumn*/ ctx[2]] && create_if_block(ctx);
+
+	return {
+		c() {
+			div = element("div");
+			if (if_block0) if_block0.c();
+			t0 = space();
+			if (if_block1) if_block1.c();
+			t1 = space();
+			if (if_block2) if_block2.c();
+			this.h();
+		},
+		l(nodes) {
+			div = claim_element(nodes, "DIV", { id: true, class: true });
+			var div_nodes = children(div);
+			if (if_block0) if_block0.l(div_nodes);
+			t0 = claim_space(div_nodes);
+			if (if_block1) if_block1.l(div_nodes);
+			t1 = claim_space(div_nodes);
+			if (if_block2) if_block2.l(div_nodes);
+			div_nodes.forEach(detach);
+			this.h();
+		},
+		h() {
+			attr(div, "id", "container");
+			attr(div, "class", "svelte-eoma5v");
+		},
+		m(target, anchor) {
+			insert_hydration(target, div, anchor);
+			if (if_block0) if_block0.m(div, null);
+			append_hydration(div, t0);
+			if (if_block1) if_block1.m(div, null);
+			append_hydration(div, t1);
+			if (if_block2) if_block2.m(div, null);
+			current = true;
+		},
+		p(ctx, [dirty]) {
+			if (/*entry*/ ctx[0][/*dataColumn*/ ctx[3]]) {
+				if (if_block0) {
+					if_block0.p(ctx, dirty);
+
+					if (dirty & /*entry, dataColumn*/ 9) {
+						transition_in(if_block0, 1);
+					}
+				} else {
+					if_block0 = create_if_block_2(ctx);
+					if_block0.c();
+					transition_in(if_block0, 1);
+					if_block0.m(div, t0);
+				}
+			} else if (if_block0) {
+				group_outros();
+
+				transition_out(if_block0, 1, 1, () => {
+					if_block0 = null;
+				});
+
+				check_outros();
+			}
+
+			if (/*entry*/ ctx[0][/*modelColumn*/ ctx[1]]) {
+				if (if_block1) {
+					if_block1.p(ctx, dirty);
+
+					if (dirty & /*entry, modelColumn*/ 3) {
+						transition_in(if_block1, 1);
+					}
+				} else {
+					if_block1 = create_if_block_1(ctx);
+					if_block1.c();
+					transition_in(if_block1, 1);
+					if_block1.m(div, t1);
+				}
+			} else if (if_block1) {
+				group_outros();
+
+				transition_out(if_block1, 1, 1, () => {
+					if_block1 = null;
+				});
+
+				check_outros();
+			}
+
+			if (/*entry*/ ctx[0][/*labelColumn*/ ctx[2]]) {
+				if (if_block2) {
+					if_block2.p(ctx, dirty);
+				} else {
+					if_block2 = create_if_block(ctx);
+					if_block2.c();
+					if_block2.m(div, null);
+				}
+			} else if (if_block2) {
+				if_block2.d(1);
+				if_block2 = null;
+			}
+		},
+		i(local) {
+			if (current) return;
+			transition_in(if_block0);
+			transition_in(if_block1);
+			current = true;
+		},
+		o(local) {
+			transition_out(if_block0);
+			transition_out(if_block1);
+			current = false;
+		},
+		d(detaching) {
+			if (detaching) detach(div);
+			if (if_block0) if_block0.d();
+			if (if_block1) if_block1.d();
+			if (if_block2) if_block2.d();
+		}
+	};
+}
+
+function instance($$self, $$props, $$invalidate) {
+	let { options } = $$props;
+	let { entry } = $$props;
+	let { modelColumn } = $$props;
+	let { labelColumn } = $$props;
+	let { dataColumn } = $$props;
+	let { idColumn } = $$props;
+
+	$$self.$$set = $$props => {
+		if ('options' in $$props) $$invalidate(4, options = $$props.options);
+		if ('entry' in $$props) $$invalidate(0, entry = $$props.entry);
+		if ('modelColumn' in $$props) $$invalidate(1, modelColumn = $$props.modelColumn);
+		if ('labelColumn' in $$props) $$invalidate(2, labelColumn = $$props.labelColumn);
+		if ('dataColumn' in $$props) $$invalidate(3, dataColumn = $$props.dataColumn);
+		if ('idColumn' in $$props) $$invalidate(5, idColumn = $$props.idColumn);
+	};
+
+	return [entry, modelColumn, labelColumn, dataColumn, options, idColumn];
+}
+
+class InstanceView extends SvelteComponent {
+	constructor(options) {
+		super();
+
+		init(
+			this,
+			options,
+			instance,
+			create_fragment,
+			safe_not_equal,
+			{
+				options: 4,
+				entry: 0,
+				modelColumn: 1,
+				labelColumn: 2,
+				dataColumn: 3,
+				idColumn: 5
+			},
+			add_css
+		);
+	}
+}
+
+function getInstance(
+  div,
+  viewOptions,
+  entry,
+  modelColumn,
+  labelColumn,
+  dataColumn,
+  idColumn
+) {
+  new InstanceView({
+    target: div,
+    props: {
+      entry: entry,
+      viewOptions: viewOptions,
+      modelColumn: modelColumn,
+      labelColumn: labelColumn,
+      dataColumn: dataColumn,
+      idColumn: idColumn,
+    },
+    hydrate: true,
+  });
+}
+
+// export function getOptions(div, setOptions) {
+//   new OptionsView({
+//     target: div,
+//     props: {
+//       setOptions,
+//     },
+//   });
+// }
+
+export { getInstance };
diff --git a/evals/.zeno_cache_med-mcqa/OUTPUTgpt-3_5-turbo.pickle b/evals/.zeno_cache_med-mcqa/OUTPUTgpt-3_5-turbo.pickle
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c6d893eeaf6b9942228a45041bed374069568c34
--- /dev/null
+++ b/evals/.zeno_cache_med-mcqa/OUTPUTgpt-3_5-turbo.pickle
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:9a1dea80f5d14daf234f4b17afb362862c91dc756d3c35b73773b52f2ee4a09a
+size 14751
diff --git a/evals/.zeno_cache_med-mcqa/OUTPUTgpt-4.pickle b/evals/.zeno_cache_med-mcqa/OUTPUTgpt-4.pickle
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1d5e7d3b23d2ba60b89b8871646967282ac07be2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/evals/.zeno_cache_med-mcqa/OUTPUTgpt-4.pickle
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:c387eaf2a1a91b61d8c423f5fcf03a1b041910167503ff338616cf10d71678bd
+size 14181
diff --git a/evals/.zeno_cache_med-mcqa/POSTDISTILLcorrectgpt-3_5-turbo.pickle b/evals/.zeno_cache_med-mcqa/POSTDISTILLcorrectgpt-3_5-turbo.pickle
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..54868e767555b9725924c3a53dc00801df4659fc
--- /dev/null
+++ b/evals/.zeno_cache_med-mcqa/POSTDISTILLcorrectgpt-3_5-turbo.pickle
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:93a1ea71707e92e1d1c0e5da10558617f1620ceed9393131b0d0b5e343311f0a
+size 7084
diff --git a/evals/.zeno_cache_med-mcqa/POSTDISTILLcorrectgpt-4.pickle b/evals/.zeno_cache_med-mcqa/POSTDISTILLcorrectgpt-4.pickle
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8e55e29fcc74bf8e0ce1edb9a94246e85abe6845
--- /dev/null
+++ b/evals/.zeno_cache_med-mcqa/POSTDISTILLcorrectgpt-4.pickle
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:0b25a0cab75b70977ab5607ca6fc618f6568f412831fa415750c2d0c5f96ebc3
+size 7076
diff --git a/evals/.zeno_cache_med-mcqa/folders.pickle b/evals/.zeno_cache_med-mcqa/folders.pickle
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6f61606d9f0ce6528f4adfd3ebe8da336629c1a1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/evals/.zeno_cache_med-mcqa/folders.pickle
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:ec0a6ccf9debf1c16781445c4b9106080d00478b0559469336db7c7b7b9711c8
+size 5
diff --git a/evals/.zeno_cache_med-mcqa/reports.pickle b/evals/.zeno_cache_med-mcqa/reports.pickle
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6f61606d9f0ce6528f4adfd3ebe8da336629c1a1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/evals/.zeno_cache_med-mcqa/reports.pickle
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:ec0a6ccf9debf1c16781445c4b9106080d00478b0559469336db7c7b7b9711c8
+size 5
diff --git a/evals/.zeno_cache_med-mcqa/view.mjs b/evals/.zeno_cache_med-mcqa/view.mjs
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a233ab94985094652cc8d8cde2fe6f8ff3f40793
--- /dev/null
+++ b/evals/.zeno_cache_med-mcqa/view.mjs
@@ -0,0 +1,1574 @@
+function noop() { }
+function run(fn) {
+    return fn();
+}
+function blank_object() {
+    return Object.create(null);
+}
+function run_all(fns) {
+    fns.forEach(run);
+}
+function is_function(thing) {
+    return typeof thing === 'function';
+}
+function safe_not_equal(a, b) {
+    return a != a ? b == b : a !== b || ((a && typeof a === 'object') || typeof a === 'function');
+}
+function is_empty(obj) {
+    return Object.keys(obj).length === 0;
+}
+function null_to_empty(value) {
+    return value == null ? '' : value;
+}
+
+// Track which nodes are claimed during hydration. Unclaimed nodes can then be removed from the DOM
+// at the end of hydration without touching the remaining nodes.
+let is_hydrating = false;
+function start_hydrating() {
+    is_hydrating = true;
+}
+function end_hydrating() {
+    is_hydrating = false;
+}
+function upper_bound(low, high, key, value) {
+    // Return first index of value larger than input value in the range [low, high)
+    while (low < high) {
+        const mid = low + ((high - low) >> 1);
+        if (key(mid) <= value) {
+            low = mid + 1;
+        }
+        else {
+            high = mid;
+        }
+    }
+    return low;
+}
+function init_hydrate(target) {
+    if (target.hydrate_init)
+        return;
+    target.hydrate_init = true;
+    // We know that all children have claim_order values since the unclaimed have been detached if target is not <head>
+    let children = target.childNodes;
+    // If target is <head>, there may be children without claim_order
+    if (target.nodeName === 'HEAD') {
+        const myChildren = [];
+        for (let i = 0; i < children.length; i++) {
+            const node = children[i];
+            if (node.claim_order !== undefined) {
+                myChildren.push(node);
+            }
+        }
+        children = myChildren;
+    }
+    /*
+    * Reorder claimed children optimally.
+    * We can reorder claimed children optimally by finding the longest subsequence of
+    * nodes that are already claimed in order and only moving the rest. The longest
+    * subsequence of nodes that are claimed in order can be found by
+    * computing the longest increasing subsequence of .claim_order values.
+    *
+    * This algorithm is optimal in generating the least amount of reorder operations
+    * possible.
+    *
+    * Proof:
+    * We know that, given a set of reordering operations, the nodes that do not move
+    * always form an increasing subsequence, since they do not move among each other
+    * meaning that they must be already ordered among each other. Thus, the maximal
+    * set of nodes that do not move form a longest increasing subsequence.
+    */
+    // Compute longest increasing subsequence
+    // m: subsequence length j => index k of smallest value that ends an increasing subsequence of length j
+    const m = new Int32Array(children.length + 1);
+    // Predecessor indices + 1
+    const p = new Int32Array(children.length);
+    m[0] = -1;
+    let longest = 0;
+    for (let i = 0; i < children.length; i++) {
+        const current = children[i].claim_order;
+        // Find the largest subsequence length such that it ends in a value less than our current value
+        // upper_bound returns first greater value, so we subtract one
+        // with fast path for when we are on the current longest subsequence
+        const seqLen = ((longest > 0 && children[m[longest]].claim_order <= current) ? longest + 1 : upper_bound(1, longest, idx => children[m[idx]].claim_order, current)) - 1;
+        p[i] = m[seqLen] + 1;
+        const newLen = seqLen + 1;
+        // We can guarantee that current is the smallest value. Otherwise, we would have generated a longer sequence.
+        m[newLen] = i;
+        longest = Math.max(newLen, longest);
+    }
+    // The longest increasing subsequence of nodes (initially reversed)
+    const lis = [];
+    // The rest of the nodes, nodes that will be moved
+    const toMove = [];
+    let last = children.length - 1;
+    for (let cur = m[longest] + 1; cur != 0; cur = p[cur - 1]) {
+        lis.push(children[cur - 1]);
+        for (; last >= cur; last--) {
+            toMove.push(children[last]);
+        }
+        last--;
+    }
+    for (; last >= 0; last--) {
+        toMove.push(children[last]);
+    }
+    lis.reverse();
+    // We sort the nodes being moved to guarantee that their insertion order matches the claim order
+    toMove.sort((a, b) => a.claim_order - b.claim_order);
+    // Finally, we move the nodes
+    for (let i = 0, j = 0; i < toMove.length; i++) {
+        while (j < lis.length && toMove[i].claim_order >= lis[j].claim_order) {
+            j++;
+        }
+        const anchor = j < lis.length ? lis[j] : null;
+        target.insertBefore(toMove[i], anchor);
+    }
+}
+function append(target, node) {
+    target.appendChild(node);
+}
+function append_styles(target, style_sheet_id, styles) {
+    const append_styles_to = get_root_for_style(target);
+    if (!append_styles_to.getElementById(style_sheet_id)) {
+        const style = element('style');
+        style.id = style_sheet_id;
+        style.textContent = styles;
+        append_stylesheet(append_styles_to, style);
+    }
+}
+function get_root_for_style(node) {
+    if (!node)
+        return document;
+    const root = node.getRootNode ? node.getRootNode() : node.ownerDocument;
+    if (root && root.host) {
+        return root;
+    }
+    return node.ownerDocument;
+}
+function append_stylesheet(node, style) {
+    append(node.head || node, style);
+    return style.sheet;
+}
+function append_hydration(target, node) {
+    if (is_hydrating) {
+        init_hydrate(target);
+        if ((target.actual_end_child === undefined) || ((target.actual_end_child !== null) && (target.actual_end_child.parentNode !== target))) {
+            target.actual_end_child = target.firstChild;
+        }
+        // Skip nodes of undefined ordering
+        while ((target.actual_end_child !== null) && (target.actual_end_child.claim_order === undefined)) {
+            target.actual_end_child = target.actual_end_child.nextSibling;
+        }
+        if (node !== target.actual_end_child) {
+            // We only insert if the ordering of this node should be modified or the parent node is not target
+            if (node.claim_order !== undefined || node.parentNode !== target) {
+                target.insertBefore(node, target.actual_end_child);
+            }
+        }
+        else {
+            target.actual_end_child = node.nextSibling;
+        }
+    }
+    else if (node.parentNode !== target || node.nextSibling !== null) {
+        target.appendChild(node);
+    }
+}
+function insert_hydration(target, node, anchor) {
+    if (is_hydrating && !anchor) {
+        append_hydration(target, node);
+    }
+    else if (node.parentNode !== target || node.nextSibling != anchor) {
+        target.insertBefore(node, anchor || null);
+    }
+}
+function detach(node) {
+    if (node.parentNode) {
+        node.parentNode.removeChild(node);
+    }
+}
+function destroy_each(iterations, detaching) {
+    for (let i = 0; i < iterations.length; i += 1) {
+        if (iterations[i])
+            iterations[i].d(detaching);
+    }
+}
+function element(name) {
+    return document.createElement(name);
+}
+function svg_element(name) {
+    return document.createElementNS('http://www.w3.org/2000/svg', name);
+}
+function text(data) {
+    return document.createTextNode(data);
+}
+function space() {
+    return text(' ');
+}
+function empty() {
+    return text('');
+}
+function attr(node, attribute, value) {
+    if (value == null)
+        node.removeAttribute(attribute);
+    else if (node.getAttribute(attribute) !== value)
+        node.setAttribute(attribute, value);
+}
+function children(element) {
+    return Array.from(element.childNodes);
+}
+function init_claim_info(nodes) {
+    if (nodes.claim_info === undefined) {
+        nodes.claim_info = { last_index: 0, total_claimed: 0 };
+    }
+}
+function claim_node(nodes, predicate, processNode, createNode, dontUpdateLastIndex = false) {
+    // Try to find nodes in an order such that we lengthen the longest increasing subsequence
+    init_claim_info(nodes);
+    const resultNode = (() => {
+        // We first try to find an element after the previous one
+        for (let i = nodes.claim_info.last_index; i < nodes.length; i++) {
+            const node = nodes[i];
+            if (predicate(node)) {
+                const replacement = processNode(node);
+                if (replacement === undefined) {
+                    nodes.splice(i, 1);
+                }
+                else {
+                    nodes[i] = replacement;
+                }
+                if (!dontUpdateLastIndex) {
+                    nodes.claim_info.last_index = i;
+                }
+                return node;
+            }
+        }
+        // Otherwise, we try to find one before
+        // We iterate in reverse so that we don't go too far back
+        for (let i = nodes.claim_info.last_index - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
+            const node = nodes[i];
+            if (predicate(node)) {
+                const replacement = processNode(node);
+                if (replacement === undefined) {
+                    nodes.splice(i, 1);
+                }
+                else {
+                    nodes[i] = replacement;
+                }
+                if (!dontUpdateLastIndex) {
+                    nodes.claim_info.last_index = i;
+                }
+                else if (replacement === undefined) {
+                    // Since we spliced before the last_index, we decrease it
+                    nodes.claim_info.last_index--;
+                }
+                return node;
+            }
+        }
+        // If we can't find any matching node, we create a new one
+        return createNode();
+    })();
+    resultNode.claim_order = nodes.claim_info.total_claimed;
+    nodes.claim_info.total_claimed += 1;
+    return resultNode;
+}
+function claim_element_base(nodes, name, attributes, create_element) {
+    return claim_node(nodes, (node) => node.nodeName === name, (node) => {
+        const remove = [];
+        for (let j = 0; j < node.attributes.length; j++) {
+            const attribute = node.attributes[j];
+            if (!attributes[attribute.name]) {
+                remove.push(attribute.name);
+            }
+        }
+        remove.forEach(v => node.removeAttribute(v));
+        return undefined;
+    }, () => create_element(name));
+}
+function claim_element(nodes, name, attributes) {
+    return claim_element_base(nodes, name, attributes, element);
+}
+function claim_svg_element(nodes, name, attributes) {
+    return claim_element_base(nodes, name, attributes, svg_element);
+}
+function claim_text(nodes, data) {
+    return claim_node(nodes, (node) => node.nodeType === 3, (node) => {
+        const dataStr = '' + data;
+        if (node.data.startsWith(dataStr)) {
+            if (node.data.length !== dataStr.length) {
+                return node.splitText(dataStr.length);
+            }
+        }
+        else {
+            node.data = dataStr;
+        }
+    }, () => text(data), true // Text nodes should not update last index since it is likely not worth it to eliminate an increasing subsequence of actual elements
+    );
+}
+function claim_space(nodes) {
+    return claim_text(nodes, ' ');
+}
+function set_data(text, data) {
+    data = '' + data;
+    if (text.wholeText !== data)
+        text.data = data;
+}
+
+let current_component;
+function set_current_component(component) {
+    current_component = component;
+}
+
+const dirty_components = [];
+const binding_callbacks = [];
+const render_callbacks = [];
+const flush_callbacks = [];
+const resolved_promise = Promise.resolve();
+let update_scheduled = false;
+function schedule_update() {
+    if (!update_scheduled) {
+        update_scheduled = true;
+        resolved_promise.then(flush);
+    }
+}
+function add_render_callback(fn) {
+    render_callbacks.push(fn);
+}
+// flush() calls callbacks in this order:
+// 1. All beforeUpdate callbacks, in order: parents before children
+// 2. All bind:this callbacks, in reverse order: children before parents.
+// 3. All afterUpdate callbacks, in order: parents before children. EXCEPT
+//    for afterUpdates called during the initial onMount, which are called in
+//    reverse order: children before parents.
+// Since callbacks might update component values, which could trigger another
+// call to flush(), the following steps guard against this:
+// 1. During beforeUpdate, any updated components will be added to the
+//    dirty_components array and will cause a reentrant call to flush(). Because
+//    the flush index is kept outside the function, the reentrant call will pick
+//    up where the earlier call left off and go through all dirty components. The
+//    current_component value is saved and restored so that the reentrant call will
+//    not interfere with the "parent" flush() call.
+// 2. bind:this callbacks cannot trigger new flush() calls.
+// 3. During afterUpdate, any updated components will NOT have their afterUpdate
+//    callback called a second time; the seen_callbacks set, outside the flush()
+//    function, guarantees this behavior.
+const seen_callbacks = new Set();
+let flushidx = 0; // Do *not* move this inside the flush() function
+function flush() {
+    // Do not reenter flush while dirty components are updated, as this can
+    // result in an infinite loop. Instead, let the inner flush handle it.
+    // Reentrancy is ok afterwards for bindings etc.
+    if (flushidx !== 0) {
+        return;
+    }
+    const saved_component = current_component;
+    do {
+        // first, call beforeUpdate functions
+        // and update components
+        try {
+            while (flushidx < dirty_components.length) {
+                const component = dirty_components[flushidx];
+                flushidx++;
+                set_current_component(component);
+                update(component.$$);
+            }
+        }
+        catch (e) {
+            // reset dirty state to not end up in a deadlocked state and then rethrow
+            dirty_components.length = 0;
+            flushidx = 0;
+            throw e;
+        }
+        set_current_component(null);
+        dirty_components.length = 0;
+        flushidx = 0;
+        while (binding_callbacks.length)
+            binding_callbacks.pop()();
+        // then, once components are updated, call
+        // afterUpdate functions. This may cause
+        // subsequent updates...
+        for (let i = 0; i < render_callbacks.length; i += 1) {
+            const callback = render_callbacks[i];
+            if (!seen_callbacks.has(callback)) {
+                // ...so guard against infinite loops
+                seen_callbacks.add(callback);
+                callback();
+            }
+        }
+        render_callbacks.length = 0;
+    } while (dirty_components.length);
+    while (flush_callbacks.length) {
+        flush_callbacks.pop()();
+    }
+    update_scheduled = false;
+    seen_callbacks.clear();
+    set_current_component(saved_component);
+}
+function update($$) {
+    if ($$.fragment !== null) {
+        $$.update();
+        run_all($$.before_update);
+        const dirty = $$.dirty;
+        $$.dirty = [-1];
+        $$.fragment && $$.fragment.p($$.ctx, dirty);
+        $$.after_update.forEach(add_render_callback);
+    }
+}
+const outroing = new Set();
+let outros;
+function group_outros() {
+    outros = {
+        r: 0,
+        c: [],
+        p: outros // parent group
+    };
+}
+function check_outros() {
+    if (!outros.r) {
+        run_all(outros.c);
+    }
+    outros = outros.p;
+}
+function transition_in(block, local) {
+    if (block && block.i) {
+        outroing.delete(block);
+        block.i(local);
+    }
+}
+function transition_out(block, local, detach, callback) {
+    if (block && block.o) {
+        if (outroing.has(block))
+            return;
+        outroing.add(block);
+        outros.c.push(() => {
+            outroing.delete(block);
+            if (callback) {
+                if (detach)
+                    block.d(1);
+                callback();
+            }
+        });
+        block.o(local);
+    }
+    else if (callback) {
+        callback();
+    }
+}
+function create_component(block) {
+    block && block.c();
+}
+function claim_component(block, parent_nodes) {
+    block && block.l(parent_nodes);
+}
+function mount_component(component, target, anchor, customElement) {
+    const { fragment, after_update } = component.$$;
+    fragment && fragment.m(target, anchor);
+    if (!customElement) {
+        // onMount happens before the initial afterUpdate
+        add_render_callback(() => {
+            const new_on_destroy = component.$$.on_mount.map(run).filter(is_function);
+            // if the component was destroyed immediately
+            // it will update the `$$.on_destroy` reference to `null`.
+            // the destructured on_destroy may still reference to the old array
+            if (component.$$.on_destroy) {
+                component.$$.on_destroy.push(...new_on_destroy);
+            }
+            else {
+                // Edge case - component was destroyed immediately,
+                // most likely as a result of a binding initialising
+                run_all(new_on_destroy);
+            }
+            component.$$.on_mount = [];
+        });
+    }
+    after_update.forEach(add_render_callback);
+}
+function destroy_component(component, detaching) {
+    const $$ = component.$$;
+    if ($$.fragment !== null) {
+        run_all($$.on_destroy);
+        $$.fragment && $$.fragment.d(detaching);
+        // TODO null out other refs, including component.$$ (but need to
+        // preserve final state?)
+        $$.on_destroy = $$.fragment = null;
+        $$.ctx = [];
+    }
+}
+function make_dirty(component, i) {
+    if (component.$$.dirty[0] === -1) {
+        dirty_components.push(component);
+        schedule_update();
+        component.$$.dirty.fill(0);
+    }
+    component.$$.dirty[(i / 31) | 0] |= (1 << (i % 31));
+}
+function init(component, options, instance, create_fragment, not_equal, props, append_styles, dirty = [-1]) {
+    const parent_component = current_component;
+    set_current_component(component);
+    const $$ = component.$$ = {
+        fragment: null,
+        ctx: [],
+        // state
+        props,
+        update: noop,
+        not_equal,
+        bound: blank_object(),
+        // lifecycle
+        on_mount: [],
+        on_destroy: [],
+        on_disconnect: [],
+        before_update: [],
+        after_update: [],
+        context: new Map(options.context || (parent_component ? parent_component.$$.context : [])),
+        // everything else
+        callbacks: blank_object(),
+        dirty,
+        skip_bound: false,
+        root: options.target || parent_component.$$.root
+    };
+    append_styles && append_styles($$.root);
+    let ready = false;
+    $$.ctx = instance
+        ? instance(component, options.props || {}, (i, ret, ...rest) => {
+            const value = rest.length ? rest[0] : ret;
+            if ($$.ctx && not_equal($$.ctx[i], $$.ctx[i] = value)) {
+                if (!$$.skip_bound && $$.bound[i])
+                    $$.bound[i](value);
+                if (ready)
+                    make_dirty(component, i);
+            }
+            return ret;
+        })
+        : [];
+    $$.update();
+    ready = true;
+    run_all($$.before_update);
+    // `false` as a special case of no DOM component
+    $$.fragment = create_fragment ? create_fragment($$.ctx) : false;
+    if (options.target) {
+        if (options.hydrate) {
+            start_hydrating();
+            const nodes = children(options.target);
+            // eslint-disable-next-line @typescript-eslint/no-non-null-assertion
+            $$.fragment && $$.fragment.l(nodes);
+            nodes.forEach(detach);
+        }
+        else {
+            // eslint-disable-next-line @typescript-eslint/no-non-null-assertion
+            $$.fragment && $$.fragment.c();
+        }
+        if (options.intro)
+            transition_in(component.$$.fragment);
+        mount_component(component, options.target, options.anchor, options.customElement);
+        end_hydrating();
+        flush();
+    }
+    set_current_component(parent_component);
+}
+/**
+ * Base class for Svelte components. Used when dev=false.
+ */
+class SvelteComponent {
+    $destroy() {
+        destroy_component(this, 1);
+        this.$destroy = noop;
+    }
+    $on(type, callback) {
+        if (!is_function(callback)) {
+            return noop;
+        }
+        const callbacks = (this.$$.callbacks[type] || (this.$$.callbacks[type] = []));
+        callbacks.push(callback);
+        return () => {
+            const index = callbacks.indexOf(callback);
+            if (index !== -1)
+                callbacks.splice(index, 1);
+        };
+    }
+    $set($$props) {
+        if (this.$$set && !is_empty($$props)) {
+            this.$$.skip_bound = true;
+            this.$$set($$props);
+            this.$$.skip_bound = false;
+        }
+    }
+}
+
+/* src/AssistantBlock.svelte generated by Svelte v3.55.1 */
+
+function add_css$3(target) {
+	append_styles(target, "svelte-1e3mbn4", ".model.svelte-1e3mbn4.svelte-1e3mbn4{fill:var(--logo)}.no-model.svelte-1e3mbn4.svelte-1e3mbn4{fill:var(--G3)}.model-border.svelte-1e3mbn4.svelte-1e3mbn4{border:1px solid var(--logo)}.no-model-border.svelte-1e3mbn4.svelte-1e3mbn4{border:1px solid rgba(224, 224, 224, 1)}.box.svelte-1e3mbn4.svelte-1e3mbn4{margin-top:10px;margin-bottom:10px;display:flex;align-items:start}.box.svelte-1e3mbn4 svg.svelte-1e3mbn4{min-width:24px;width:24px;margin-right:10px;margin-top:7px}.chat.svelte-1e3mbn4.svelte-1e3mbn4{border-radius:5px;margin:0px;padding:10px;overflow-wrap:anywhere}");
+}
+
+function create_fragment$3(ctx) {
+	let div;
+	let svg;
+	let path;
+	let svg_class_value;
+	let t0;
+	let p;
+	let t1;
+	let p_class_value;
+
+	return {
+		c() {
+			div = element("div");
+			svg = svg_element("svg");
+			path = svg_element("path");
+			t0 = space();
+			p = element("p");
+			t1 = text(/*input*/ ctx[0]);
+			this.h();
+		},
+		l(nodes) {
+			div = claim_element(nodes, "DIV", { class: true });
+			var div_nodes = children(div);
+			svg = claim_svg_element(div_nodes, "svg", { xmlns: true, viewBox: true, class: true });
+			var svg_nodes = children(svg);
+			path = claim_svg_element(svg_nodes, "path", { d: true });
+			children(path).forEach(detach);
+			svg_nodes.forEach(detach);
+			t0 = claim_space(div_nodes);
+			p = claim_element(div_nodes, "P", { class: true });
+			var p_nodes = children(p);
+			t1 = claim_text(p_nodes, /*input*/ ctx[0]);
+			p_nodes.forEach(detach);
+			div_nodes.forEach(detach);
+			this.h();
+		},
+		h() {
+			attr(path, "d", "M320 0c17.7 0 32 14.3 32 32V96H472c39.8 0 72 32.2 72 72V440c0 39.8-32.2 72-72 72H168c-39.8 0-72-32.2-72-72V168c0-39.8 32.2-72 72-72H288V32c0-17.7 14.3-32 32-32zM208 384c-8.8 0-16 7.2-16 16s7.2 16 16 16h32c8.8 0 16-7.2 16-16s-7.2-16-16-16H208zm96 0c-8.8 0-16 7.2-16 16s7.2 16 16 16h32c8.8 0 16-7.2 16-16s-7.2-16-16-16H304zm96 0c-8.8 0-16 7.2-16 16s7.2 16 16 16h32c8.8 0 16-7.2 16-16s-7.2-16-16-16H400zM264 256a40 40 0 1 0 -80 0 40 40 0 1 0 80 0zm152 40a40 40 0 1 0 0-80 40 40 0 1 0 0 80zM48 224H64V416H48c-26.5 0-48-21.5-48-48V272c0-26.5 21.5-48 48-48zm544 0c26.5 0 48 21.5 48 48v96c0 26.5-21.5 48-48 48H576V224h16z");
+			attr(svg, "xmlns", "http://www.w3.org/2000/svg");
+			attr(svg, "viewBox", "0 0 640 512");
+			attr(svg, "class", svg_class_value = "" + (null_to_empty(/*output*/ ctx[1] ? "model" : "no-model") + " svelte-1e3mbn4"));
+			attr(p, "class", p_class_value = "chat " + (/*output*/ ctx[1] ? 'model-border' : 'no-model-border') + " svelte-1e3mbn4");
+			attr(div, "class", "box svelte-1e3mbn4");
+		},
+		m(target, anchor) {
+			insert_hydration(target, div, anchor);
+			append_hydration(div, svg);
+			append_hydration(svg, path);
+			append_hydration(div, t0);
+			append_hydration(div, p);
+			append_hydration(p, t1);
+		},
+		p(ctx, [dirty]) {
+			if (dirty & /*output*/ 2 && svg_class_value !== (svg_class_value = "" + (null_to_empty(/*output*/ ctx[1] ? "model" : "no-model") + " svelte-1e3mbn4"))) {
+				attr(svg, "class", svg_class_value);
+			}
+
+			if (dirty & /*input*/ 1) set_data(t1, /*input*/ ctx[0]);
+
+			if (dirty & /*output*/ 2 && p_class_value !== (p_class_value = "chat " + (/*output*/ ctx[1] ? 'model-border' : 'no-model-border') + " svelte-1e3mbn4")) {
+				attr(p, "class", p_class_value);
+			}
+		},
+		i: noop,
+		o: noop,
+		d(detaching) {
+			if (detaching) detach(div);
+		}
+	};
+}
+
+function instance$3($$self, $$props, $$invalidate) {
+	let { input } = $$props;
+	let { output = false } = $$props;
+
+	$$self.$$set = $$props => {
+		if ('input' in $$props) $$invalidate(0, input = $$props.input);
+		if ('output' in $$props) $$invalidate(1, output = $$props.output);
+	};
+
+	return [input, output];
+}
+
+class AssistantBlock extends SvelteComponent {
+	constructor(options) {
+		super();
+		init(this, options, instance$3, create_fragment$3, safe_not_equal, { input: 0, output: 1 }, add_css$3);
+	}
+}
+
+/* src/SystemBlock.svelte generated by Svelte v3.55.1 */
+
+function add_css$2(target) {
+	append_styles(target, "svelte-18o0ab2", "p.svelte-18o0ab2{margin:0px}");
+}
+
+function create_fragment$2(ctx) {
+	let p;
+	let b;
+	let t0;
+	let t1;
+	let span;
+	let t2;
+
+	return {
+		c() {
+			p = element("p");
+			b = element("b");
+			t0 = text("System:");
+			t1 = space();
+			span = element("span");
+			t2 = text(/*input*/ ctx[0]);
+			this.h();
+		},
+		l(nodes) {
+			p = claim_element(nodes, "P", { class: true });
+			var p_nodes = children(p);
+			b = claim_element(p_nodes, "B", {});
+			var b_nodes = children(b);
+			t0 = claim_text(b_nodes, "System:");
+			b_nodes.forEach(detach);
+			t1 = claim_space(p_nodes);
+			span = claim_element(p_nodes, "SPAN", {});
+			var span_nodes = children(span);
+			t2 = claim_text(span_nodes, /*input*/ ctx[0]);
+			span_nodes.forEach(detach);
+			p_nodes.forEach(detach);
+			this.h();
+		},
+		h() {
+			attr(p, "class", "svelte-18o0ab2");
+		},
+		m(target, anchor) {
+			insert_hydration(target, p, anchor);
+			append_hydration(p, b);
+			append_hydration(b, t0);
+			append_hydration(p, t1);
+			append_hydration(p, span);
+			append_hydration(span, t2);
+		},
+		p(ctx, [dirty]) {
+			if (dirty & /*input*/ 1) set_data(t2, /*input*/ ctx[0]);
+		},
+		i: noop,
+		o: noop,
+		d(detaching) {
+			if (detaching) detach(p);
+		}
+	};
+}
+
+function instance$2($$self, $$props, $$invalidate) {
+	let { input } = $$props;
+
+	$$self.$$set = $$props => {
+		if ('input' in $$props) $$invalidate(0, input = $$props.input);
+	};
+
+	return [input];
+}
+
+class SystemBlock extends SvelteComponent {
+	constructor(options) {
+		super();
+		init(this, options, instance$2, create_fragment$2, safe_not_equal, { input: 0 }, add_css$2);
+	}
+}
+
+/* src/UserBlock.svelte generated by Svelte v3.55.1 */
+
+function add_css$1(target) {
+	append_styles(target, "svelte-1lys9p1", ".box.svelte-1lys9p1.svelte-1lys9p1{margin-top:10px;margin-bottom:10px;display:flex;align-items:start}.box.svelte-1lys9p1 svg.svelte-1lys9p1{min-width:24px;width:24px;margin-right:10px;margin-top:7px;fill:var(--G3)}.chat.svelte-1lys9p1.svelte-1lys9p1{border:1px solid rgba(224, 224, 224, 1);border-radius:5px;margin:0px;padding:10px;overflow-wrap:anywhere}");
+}
+
+function create_fragment$1(ctx) {
+	let div;
+	let svg;
+	let path;
+	let t0;
+	let p;
+	let t1;
+
+	return {
+		c() {
+			div = element("div");
+			svg = svg_element("svg");
+			path = svg_element("path");
+			t0 = space();
+			p = element("p");
+			t1 = text(/*input*/ ctx[0]);
+			this.h();
+		},
+		l(nodes) {
+			div = claim_element(nodes, "DIV", { class: true });
+			var div_nodes = children(div);
+			svg = claim_svg_element(div_nodes, "svg", { xmlns: true, viewBox: true, class: true });
+			var svg_nodes = children(svg);
+			path = claim_svg_element(svg_nodes, "path", { d: true });
+			children(path).forEach(detach);
+			svg_nodes.forEach(detach);
+			t0 = claim_space(div_nodes);
+			p = claim_element(div_nodes, "P", { class: true });
+			var p_nodes = children(p);
+			t1 = claim_text(p_nodes, /*input*/ ctx[0]);
+			p_nodes.forEach(detach);
+			div_nodes.forEach(detach);
+			this.h();
+		},
+		h() {
+			attr(path, "d", "M224 256A128 128 0 1 0 224 0a128 128 0 1 0 0 256zm-45.7 48C79.8 304 0 383.8 0 482.3C0 498.7 13.3 512 29.7 512H418.3c16.4 0 29.7-13.3 29.7-29.7C448 383.8 368.2 304 269.7 304H178.3z");
+			attr(svg, "xmlns", "http://www.w3.org/2000/svg");
+			attr(svg, "viewBox", "0 0 448 512");
+			attr(svg, "class", "svelte-1lys9p1");
+			attr(p, "class", "chat svelte-1lys9p1");
+			attr(div, "class", "box svelte-1lys9p1");
+		},
+		m(target, anchor) {
+			insert_hydration(target, div, anchor);
+			append_hydration(div, svg);
+			append_hydration(svg, path);
+			append_hydration(div, t0);
+			append_hydration(div, p);
+			append_hydration(p, t1);
+		},
+		p(ctx, [dirty]) {
+			if (dirty & /*input*/ 1) set_data(t1, /*input*/ ctx[0]);
+		},
+		i: noop,
+		o: noop,
+		d(detaching) {
+			if (detaching) detach(div);
+		}
+	};
+}
+
+function instance$1($$self, $$props, $$invalidate) {
+	let { input } = $$props;
+
+	$$self.$$set = $$props => {
+		if ('input' in $$props) $$invalidate(0, input = $$props.input);
+	};
+
+	return [input];
+}
+
+class UserBlock extends SvelteComponent {
+	constructor(options) {
+		super();
+		init(this, options, instance$1, create_fragment$1, safe_not_equal, { input: 0 }, add_css$1);
+	}
+}
+
+/* src/InstanceView.svelte generated by Svelte v3.55.1 */
+
+function add_css(target) {
+	append_styles(target, "svelte-eoma5v", "#container.svelte-eoma5v{border:0.5px solid rgb(224, 224, 224);min-width:350px;border-radius:2px;padding:10px}.label.svelte-eoma5v{margin-right:5px;font-weight:700}p.svelte-eoma5v{margin:5px;overflow-wrap:anywhere}");
+}
+
+function get_each_context(ctx, list, i) {
+	const child_ctx = ctx.slice();
+	child_ctx[6] = list[i];
+	return child_ctx;
+}
+
+// (21:2) {#if entry[dataColumn]}
+function create_if_block_2(ctx) {
+	let current_block_type_index;
+	let if_block;
+	let if_block_anchor;
+	let current;
+	const if_block_creators = [create_if_block_3, create_else_block];
+	const if_blocks = [];
+
+	function select_block_type(ctx, dirty) {
+		if (typeof /*entry*/ ctx[0][/*dataColumn*/ ctx[3]] === "string") return 0;
+		return 1;
+	}
+
+	current_block_type_index = select_block_type(ctx);
+	if_block = if_blocks[current_block_type_index] = if_block_creators[current_block_type_index](ctx);
+
+	return {
+		c() {
+			if_block.c();
+			if_block_anchor = empty();
+		},
+		l(nodes) {
+			if_block.l(nodes);
+			if_block_anchor = empty();
+		},
+		m(target, anchor) {
+			if_blocks[current_block_type_index].m(target, anchor);
+			insert_hydration(target, if_block_anchor, anchor);
+			current = true;
+		},
+		p(ctx, dirty) {
+			let previous_block_index = current_block_type_index;
+			current_block_type_index = select_block_type(ctx);
+
+			if (current_block_type_index === previous_block_index) {
+				if_blocks[current_block_type_index].p(ctx, dirty);
+			} else {
+				group_outros();
+
+				transition_out(if_blocks[previous_block_index], 1, 1, () => {
+					if_blocks[previous_block_index] = null;
+				});
+
+				check_outros();
+				if_block = if_blocks[current_block_type_index];
+
+				if (!if_block) {
+					if_block = if_blocks[current_block_type_index] = if_block_creators[current_block_type_index](ctx);
+					if_block.c();
+				} else {
+					if_block.p(ctx, dirty);
+				}
+
+				transition_in(if_block, 1);
+				if_block.m(if_block_anchor.parentNode, if_block_anchor);
+			}
+		},
+		i(local) {
+			if (current) return;
+			transition_in(if_block);
+			current = true;
+		},
+		o(local) {
+			transition_out(if_block);
+			current = false;
+		},
+		d(detaching) {
+			if_blocks[current_block_type_index].d(detaching);
+			if (detaching) detach(if_block_anchor);
+		}
+	};
+}
+
+// (24:4) {:else}
+function create_else_block(ctx) {
+	let each_1_anchor;
+	let current;
+	let each_value = /*entry*/ ctx[0][/*dataColumn*/ ctx[3]];
+	let each_blocks = [];
+
+	for (let i = 0; i < each_value.length; i += 1) {
+		each_blocks[i] = create_each_block(get_each_context(ctx, each_value, i));
+	}
+
+	const out = i => transition_out(each_blocks[i], 1, 1, () => {
+		each_blocks[i] = null;
+	});
+
+	return {
+		c() {
+			for (let i = 0; i < each_blocks.length; i += 1) {
+				each_blocks[i].c();
+			}
+
+			each_1_anchor = empty();
+		},
+		l(nodes) {
+			for (let i = 0; i < each_blocks.length; i += 1) {
+				each_blocks[i].l(nodes);
+			}
+
+			each_1_anchor = empty();
+		},
+		m(target, anchor) {
+			for (let i = 0; i < each_blocks.length; i += 1) {
+				each_blocks[i].m(target, anchor);
+			}
+
+			insert_hydration(target, each_1_anchor, anchor);
+			current = true;
+		},
+		p(ctx, dirty) {
+			if (dirty & /*entry, dataColumn*/ 9) {
+				each_value = /*entry*/ ctx[0][/*dataColumn*/ ctx[3]];
+				let i;
+
+				for (i = 0; i < each_value.length; i += 1) {
+					const child_ctx = get_each_context(ctx, each_value, i);
+
+					if (each_blocks[i]) {
+						each_blocks[i].p(child_ctx, dirty);
+						transition_in(each_blocks[i], 1);
+					} else {
+						each_blocks[i] = create_each_block(child_ctx);
+						each_blocks[i].c();
+						transition_in(each_blocks[i], 1);
+						each_blocks[i].m(each_1_anchor.parentNode, each_1_anchor);
+					}
+				}
+
+				group_outros();
+
+				for (i = each_value.length; i < each_blocks.length; i += 1) {
+					out(i);
+				}
+
+				check_outros();
+			}
+		},
+		i(local) {
+			if (current) return;
+
+			for (let i = 0; i < each_value.length; i += 1) {
+				transition_in(each_blocks[i]);
+			}
+
+			current = true;
+		},
+		o(local) {
+			each_blocks = each_blocks.filter(Boolean);
+
+			for (let i = 0; i < each_blocks.length; i += 1) {
+				transition_out(each_blocks[i]);
+			}
+
+			current = false;
+		},
+		d(detaching) {
+			destroy_each(each_blocks, detaching);
+			if (detaching) detach(each_1_anchor);
+		}
+	};
+}
+
+// (22:4) {#if typeof entry[dataColumn] === "string"}
+function create_if_block_3(ctx) {
+	let userblock;
+	let current;
+
+	userblock = new UserBlock({
+			props: {
+				input: /*entry*/ ctx[0][/*dataColumn*/ ctx[3]]
+			}
+		});
+
+	return {
+		c() {
+			create_component(userblock.$$.fragment);
+		},
+		l(nodes) {
+			claim_component(userblock.$$.fragment, nodes);
+		},
+		m(target, anchor) {
+			mount_component(userblock, target, anchor);
+			current = true;
+		},
+		p(ctx, dirty) {
+			const userblock_changes = {};
+			if (dirty & /*entry, dataColumn*/ 9) userblock_changes.input = /*entry*/ ctx[0][/*dataColumn*/ ctx[3]];
+			userblock.$set(userblock_changes);
+		},
+		i(local) {
+			if (current) return;
+			transition_in(userblock.$$.fragment, local);
+			current = true;
+		},
+		o(local) {
+			transition_out(userblock.$$.fragment, local);
+			current = false;
+		},
+		d(detaching) {
+			destroy_component(userblock, detaching);
+		}
+	};
+}
+
+// (30:42) 
+function create_if_block_6(ctx) {
+	let userblock;
+	let current;
+
+	userblock = new UserBlock({
+			props: { input: /*item*/ ctx[6]["content"] }
+		});
+
+	return {
+		c() {
+			create_component(userblock.$$.fragment);
+		},
+		l(nodes) {
+			claim_component(userblock.$$.fragment, nodes);
+		},
+		m(target, anchor) {
+			mount_component(userblock, target, anchor);
+			current = true;
+		},
+		p(ctx, dirty) {
+			const userblock_changes = {};
+			if (dirty & /*entry, dataColumn*/ 9) userblock_changes.input = /*item*/ ctx[6]["content"];
+			userblock.$set(userblock_changes);
+		},
+		i(local) {
+			if (current) return;
+			transition_in(userblock.$$.fragment, local);
+			current = true;
+		},
+		o(local) {
+			transition_out(userblock.$$.fragment, local);
+			current = false;
+		},
+		d(detaching) {
+			destroy_component(userblock, detaching);
+		}
+	};
+}
+
+// (28:47) 
+function create_if_block_5(ctx) {
+	let assistantblock;
+	let current;
+
+	assistantblock = new AssistantBlock({
+			props: { input: /*item*/ ctx[6]["content"] }
+		});
+
+	return {
+		c() {
+			create_component(assistantblock.$$.fragment);
+		},
+		l(nodes) {
+			claim_component(assistantblock.$$.fragment, nodes);
+		},
+		m(target, anchor) {
+			mount_component(assistantblock, target, anchor);
+			current = true;
+		},
+		p(ctx, dirty) {
+			const assistantblock_changes = {};
+			if (dirty & /*entry, dataColumn*/ 9) assistantblock_changes.input = /*item*/ ctx[6]["content"];
+			assistantblock.$set(assistantblock_changes);
+		},
+		i(local) {
+			if (current) return;
+			transition_in(assistantblock.$$.fragment, local);
+			current = true;
+		},
+		o(local) {
+			transition_out(assistantblock.$$.fragment, local);
+			current = false;
+		},
+		d(detaching) {
+			destroy_component(assistantblock, detaching);
+		}
+	};
+}
+
+// (26:8) {#if item["role"] === "system"}
+function create_if_block_4(ctx) {
+	let systemblock;
+	let current;
+
+	systemblock = new SystemBlock({
+			props: { input: /*item*/ ctx[6]["content"] }
+		});
+
+	return {
+		c() {
+			create_component(systemblock.$$.fragment);
+		},
+		l(nodes) {
+			claim_component(systemblock.$$.fragment, nodes);
+		},
+		m(target, anchor) {
+			mount_component(systemblock, target, anchor);
+			current = true;
+		},
+		p(ctx, dirty) {
+			const systemblock_changes = {};
+			if (dirty & /*entry, dataColumn*/ 9) systemblock_changes.input = /*item*/ ctx[6]["content"];
+			systemblock.$set(systemblock_changes);
+		},
+		i(local) {
+			if (current) return;
+			transition_in(systemblock.$$.fragment, local);
+			current = true;
+		},
+		o(local) {
+			transition_out(systemblock.$$.fragment, local);
+			current = false;
+		},
+		d(detaching) {
+			destroy_component(systemblock, detaching);
+		}
+	};
+}
+
+// (25:6) {#each entry[dataColumn] as item}
+function create_each_block(ctx) {
+	let current_block_type_index;
+	let if_block;
+	let if_block_anchor;
+	let current;
+	const if_block_creators = [create_if_block_4, create_if_block_5, create_if_block_6];
+	const if_blocks = [];
+
+	function select_block_type_1(ctx, dirty) {
+		if (/*item*/ ctx[6]["role"] === "system") return 0;
+		if (/*item*/ ctx[6]["role"] === "assistant") return 1;
+		if (/*item*/ ctx[6]["role"] === "user") return 2;
+		return -1;
+	}
+
+	if (~(current_block_type_index = select_block_type_1(ctx))) {
+		if_block = if_blocks[current_block_type_index] = if_block_creators[current_block_type_index](ctx);
+	}
+
+	return {
+		c() {
+			if (if_block) if_block.c();
+			if_block_anchor = empty();
+		},
+		l(nodes) {
+			if (if_block) if_block.l(nodes);
+			if_block_anchor = empty();
+		},
+		m(target, anchor) {
+			if (~current_block_type_index) {
+				if_blocks[current_block_type_index].m(target, anchor);
+			}
+
+			insert_hydration(target, if_block_anchor, anchor);
+			current = true;
+		},
+		p(ctx, dirty) {
+			let previous_block_index = current_block_type_index;
+			current_block_type_index = select_block_type_1(ctx);
+
+			if (current_block_type_index === previous_block_index) {
+				if (~current_block_type_index) {
+					if_blocks[current_block_type_index].p(ctx, dirty);
+				}
+			} else {
+				if (if_block) {
+					group_outros();
+
+					transition_out(if_blocks[previous_block_index], 1, 1, () => {
+						if_blocks[previous_block_index] = null;
+					});
+
+					check_outros();
+				}
+
+				if (~current_block_type_index) {
+					if_block = if_blocks[current_block_type_index];
+
+					if (!if_block) {
+						if_block = if_blocks[current_block_type_index] = if_block_creators[current_block_type_index](ctx);
+						if_block.c();
+					} else {
+						if_block.p(ctx, dirty);
+					}
+
+					transition_in(if_block, 1);
+					if_block.m(if_block_anchor.parentNode, if_block_anchor);
+				} else {
+					if_block = null;
+				}
+			}
+		},
+		i(local) {
+			if (current) return;
+			transition_in(if_block);
+			current = true;
+		},
+		o(local) {
+			transition_out(if_block);
+			current = false;
+		},
+		d(detaching) {
+			if (~current_block_type_index) {
+				if_blocks[current_block_type_index].d(detaching);
+			}
+
+			if (detaching) detach(if_block_anchor);
+		}
+	};
+}
+
+// (36:2) {#if entry[modelColumn]}
+function create_if_block_1(ctx) {
+	let assistantblock;
+	let current;
+
+	assistantblock = new AssistantBlock({
+			props: {
+				input: /*entry*/ ctx[0][/*modelColumn*/ ctx[1]],
+				output: true
+			}
+		});
+
+	return {
+		c() {
+			create_component(assistantblock.$$.fragment);
+		},
+		l(nodes) {
+			claim_component(assistantblock.$$.fragment, nodes);
+		},
+		m(target, anchor) {
+			mount_component(assistantblock, target, anchor);
+			current = true;
+		},
+		p(ctx, dirty) {
+			const assistantblock_changes = {};
+			if (dirty & /*entry, modelColumn*/ 3) assistantblock_changes.input = /*entry*/ ctx[0][/*modelColumn*/ ctx[1]];
+			assistantblock.$set(assistantblock_changes);
+		},
+		i(local) {
+			if (current) return;
+			transition_in(assistantblock.$$.fragment, local);
+			current = true;
+		},
+		o(local) {
+			transition_out(assistantblock.$$.fragment, local);
+			current = false;
+		},
+		d(detaching) {
+			destroy_component(assistantblock, detaching);
+		}
+	};
+}
+
+// (39:2) {#if entry[labelColumn]}
+function create_if_block(ctx) {
+	let p;
+	let span;
+	let t0;
+	let t1;
+	let t2_value = /*entry*/ ctx[0][/*labelColumn*/ ctx[2]] + "";
+	let t2;
+
+	return {
+		c() {
+			p = element("p");
+			span = element("span");
+			t0 = text("Expected:");
+			t1 = space();
+			t2 = text(t2_value);
+			this.h();
+		},
+		l(nodes) {
+			p = claim_element(nodes, "P", { class: true });
+			var p_nodes = children(p);
+			span = claim_element(p_nodes, "SPAN", { class: true });
+			var span_nodes = children(span);
+			t0 = claim_text(span_nodes, "Expected:");
+			span_nodes.forEach(detach);
+			t1 = claim_space(p_nodes);
+			t2 = claim_text(p_nodes, t2_value);
+			p_nodes.forEach(detach);
+			this.h();
+		},
+		h() {
+			attr(span, "class", "label svelte-eoma5v");
+			attr(p, "class", "svelte-eoma5v");
+		},
+		m(target, anchor) {
+			insert_hydration(target, p, anchor);
+			append_hydration(p, span);
+			append_hydration(span, t0);
+			append_hydration(p, t1);
+			append_hydration(p, t2);
+		},
+		p(ctx, dirty) {
+			if (dirty & /*entry, labelColumn*/ 5 && t2_value !== (t2_value = /*entry*/ ctx[0][/*labelColumn*/ ctx[2]] + "")) set_data(t2, t2_value);
+		},
+		d(detaching) {
+			if (detaching) detach(p);
+		}
+	};
+}
+
+function create_fragment(ctx) {
+	let div;
+	let t0;
+	let t1;
+	let current;
+	let if_block0 = /*entry*/ ctx[0][/*dataColumn*/ ctx[3]] && create_if_block_2(ctx);
+	let if_block1 = /*entry*/ ctx[0][/*modelColumn*/ ctx[1]] && create_if_block_1(ctx);
+	let if_block2 = /*entry*/ ctx[0][/*labelColumn*/ ctx[2]] && create_if_block(ctx);
+
+	return {
+		c() {
+			div = element("div");
+			if (if_block0) if_block0.c();
+			t0 = space();
+			if (if_block1) if_block1.c();
+			t1 = space();
+			if (if_block2) if_block2.c();
+			this.h();
+		},
+		l(nodes) {
+			div = claim_element(nodes, "DIV", { id: true, class: true });
+			var div_nodes = children(div);
+			if (if_block0) if_block0.l(div_nodes);
+			t0 = claim_space(div_nodes);
+			if (if_block1) if_block1.l(div_nodes);
+			t1 = claim_space(div_nodes);
+			if (if_block2) if_block2.l(div_nodes);
+			div_nodes.forEach(detach);
+			this.h();
+		},
+		h() {
+			attr(div, "id", "container");
+			attr(div, "class", "svelte-eoma5v");
+		},
+		m(target, anchor) {
+			insert_hydration(target, div, anchor);
+			if (if_block0) if_block0.m(div, null);
+			append_hydration(div, t0);
+			if (if_block1) if_block1.m(div, null);
+			append_hydration(div, t1);
+			if (if_block2) if_block2.m(div, null);
+			current = true;
+		},
+		p(ctx, [dirty]) {
+			if (/*entry*/ ctx[0][/*dataColumn*/ ctx[3]]) {
+				if (if_block0) {
+					if_block0.p(ctx, dirty);
+
+					if (dirty & /*entry, dataColumn*/ 9) {
+						transition_in(if_block0, 1);
+					}
+				} else {
+					if_block0 = create_if_block_2(ctx);
+					if_block0.c();
+					transition_in(if_block0, 1);
+					if_block0.m(div, t0);
+				}
+			} else if (if_block0) {
+				group_outros();
+
+				transition_out(if_block0, 1, 1, () => {
+					if_block0 = null;
+				});
+
+				check_outros();
+			}
+
+			if (/*entry*/ ctx[0][/*modelColumn*/ ctx[1]]) {
+				if (if_block1) {
+					if_block1.p(ctx, dirty);
+
+					if (dirty & /*entry, modelColumn*/ 3) {
+						transition_in(if_block1, 1);
+					}
+				} else {
+					if_block1 = create_if_block_1(ctx);
+					if_block1.c();
+					transition_in(if_block1, 1);
+					if_block1.m(div, t1);
+				}
+			} else if (if_block1) {
+				group_outros();
+
+				transition_out(if_block1, 1, 1, () => {
+					if_block1 = null;
+				});
+
+				check_outros();
+			}
+
+			if (/*entry*/ ctx[0][/*labelColumn*/ ctx[2]]) {
+				if (if_block2) {
+					if_block2.p(ctx, dirty);
+				} else {
+					if_block2 = create_if_block(ctx);
+					if_block2.c();
+					if_block2.m(div, null);
+				}
+			} else if (if_block2) {
+				if_block2.d(1);
+				if_block2 = null;
+			}
+		},
+		i(local) {
+			if (current) return;
+			transition_in(if_block0);
+			transition_in(if_block1);
+			current = true;
+		},
+		o(local) {
+			transition_out(if_block0);
+			transition_out(if_block1);
+			current = false;
+		},
+		d(detaching) {
+			if (detaching) detach(div);
+			if (if_block0) if_block0.d();
+			if (if_block1) if_block1.d();
+			if (if_block2) if_block2.d();
+		}
+	};
+}
+
+function instance($$self, $$props, $$invalidate) {
+	let { options } = $$props;
+	let { entry } = $$props;
+	let { modelColumn } = $$props;
+	let { labelColumn } = $$props;
+	let { dataColumn } = $$props;
+	let { idColumn } = $$props;
+
+	$$self.$$set = $$props => {
+		if ('options' in $$props) $$invalidate(4, options = $$props.options);
+		if ('entry' in $$props) $$invalidate(0, entry = $$props.entry);
+		if ('modelColumn' in $$props) $$invalidate(1, modelColumn = $$props.modelColumn);
+		if ('labelColumn' in $$props) $$invalidate(2, labelColumn = $$props.labelColumn);
+		if ('dataColumn' in $$props) $$invalidate(3, dataColumn = $$props.dataColumn);
+		if ('idColumn' in $$props) $$invalidate(5, idColumn = $$props.idColumn);
+	};
+
+	return [entry, modelColumn, labelColumn, dataColumn, options, idColumn];
+}
+
+class InstanceView extends SvelteComponent {
+	constructor(options) {
+		super();
+
+		init(
+			this,
+			options,
+			instance,
+			create_fragment,
+			safe_not_equal,
+			{
+				options: 4,
+				entry: 0,
+				modelColumn: 1,
+				labelColumn: 2,
+				dataColumn: 3,
+				idColumn: 5
+			},
+			add_css
+		);
+	}
+}
+
+function getInstance(
+  div,
+  viewOptions,
+  entry,
+  modelColumn,
+  labelColumn,
+  dataColumn,
+  idColumn
+) {
+  new InstanceView({
+    target: div,
+    props: {
+      entry: entry,
+      viewOptions: viewOptions,
+      modelColumn: modelColumn,
+      labelColumn: labelColumn,
+      dataColumn: dataColumn,
+      idColumn: idColumn,
+    },
+    hydrate: true,
+  });
+}
+
+// export function getOptions(div, setOptions) {
+//   new OptionsView({
+//     target: div,
+//     props: {
+//       setOptions,
+//     },
+//   });
+// }
+
+export { getInstance };
diff --git a/evals/aba-mrpc-true-false/aba-3.5-turbo.jsonl b/evals/aba-mrpc-true-false/aba-3.5-turbo.jsonl
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7c4815136b8e8e0d92f1e739afaf2b1451abf68d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/evals/aba-mrpc-true-false/aba-3.5-turbo.jsonl
@@ -0,0 +1,222 @@
+{"spec": {"completion_fns": ["gpt-3.5-turbo"], "eval_name": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.v0", "base_eval": "aba_mrpc_true_false", "split": "dev", "run_config": {"completion_fns": ["gpt-3.5-turbo"], "eval_spec": {"cls": "evals.elsuite.basic.match:Match", "args": {"samples_jsonl": "aba_mrpc_true_false/samples.jsonl"}, "key": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.v0", "group": "aba-mrpc-true-false"}, "seed": 20220722, "max_samples": null, "command": "/Users/acabrera/dev-research/22-zeno/openai-eval/evals/evals/cli/oaieval.py gpt-3.5-turbo aba_mrpc_true_false", "initial_settings": {"visible": true}}, "created_by": "", "run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:30.057281"}}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 0, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.58", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the information provided about conflict of interest."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A client who has given consent to a conflict cannot revoke the consent or terminate the lawyer's representation if the lawyer reasonably and honestly believes the timing would harm the client's interests."}], "sampled": ["True. If a client has given informed consent to a conflict of interest, the client generally cannot revoke the consent or terminate the lawyer's representation based on that conflict. However, if the lawyer reasonably and honestly believes that the timing of the revocation or termination would harm the client's interests, the lawyer may be able to continue the representation despite the conflict."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:34.143937+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 1, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.58", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "False", "picked": null, "sampled": "True. If a client has given informed consent to a conflict of interest, the client generally cannot revoke the consent or terminate the lawyer's representation based on that conflict. However, if the lawyer reasonably and honestly believes that the timing of the revocation or termination would harm the client's interests, the lawyer may be able to continue the representation despite the conflict.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:34.144022+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 2, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.7", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "When lawyers from more than one law firm are providing legal services to a client on a particular matter, they do not need to consult with each other and the client about the scope of their respective representations."}], "sampled": ["False. According to Rule 1.2(e) of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, when lawyers from more than one law firm are providing legal services to a client on a particular matter, they shall consult with each other and the client about the scope of their respective representations and the allocation of responsibility among them."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:34.483696+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 3, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.7", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "False", "picked": "False", "sampled": "False. According to Rule 1.2(e) of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, when lawyers from more than one law firm are providing legal services to a client on a particular matter, they shall consult with each other and the client about the scope of their respective representations and the allocation of responsibility among them.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:34.483750+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 4, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.22", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer may charge a client an unreasonable fee or an unreasonable amount for expenses, as long as the client agrees to it."}], "sampled": ["False. According to Rule 1.5 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer shall not make an agreement for, charge, or collect an unreasonable fee or an unreasonable amount for expenses. Even if a client agrees to such a fee or expense, it is still considered a violation of the rule."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:34.533037+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 5, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.22", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "False", "picked": "False", "sampled": "False. According to Rule 1.5 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer shall not make an agreement for, charge, or collect an unreasonable fee or an unreasonable amount for expenses. Even if a client agrees to such a fee or expense, it is still considered a violation of the rule.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:34.533077+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 6, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.15", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer is allowed to draft and deliver documents that they know are fraudulent in order to assist their client."}], "sampled": ["False. A lawyer is prohibited from knowingly assisting a client in fraudulent or illegal conduct under Rule 1.2(d) of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct. A lawyer's duty is to uphold the law and promote the administration of justice. Therefore, a lawyer cannot knowingly assist a client in committing fraud or any other illegal act."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:34.669579+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 7, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.15", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "False", "picked": "False", "sampled": "False. A lawyer is prohibited from knowingly assisting a client in fraudulent or illegal conduct under Rule 1.2(d) of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct. A lawyer's duty is to uphold the law and promote the administration of justice. Therefore, a lawyer cannot knowingly assist a client in committing fraud or any other illegal act.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:34.669631+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 8, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.19", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "If a lawyer knows that a client expects assistance not permitted by the Rules of Professional Conduct, the lawyer must immediately withdraw from the representation."}], "sampled": ["True. According to Rule 1.2(d) of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer shall not counsel a client to engage, or assist a client, in conduct that the lawyer knows is criminal or fraudulent. If a lawyer's services have been used in furtherance of a crime or fraud, the lawyer must withdraw from the representation."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:34.852968+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 9, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.19", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "False", "picked": null, "sampled": "True. According to Rule 1.2(d) of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer shall not counsel a client to engage, or assist a client, in conduct that the lawyer knows is criminal or fraudulent. If a lawyer's services have been used in furtherance of a crime or fraud, the lawyer must withdraw from the representation.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:34.853017+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 10, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.54", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the information provided about conflict of interest."}, {"role": "user", "content": "In all cases, clients can consent to a representation where a conflict of interest exists."}], "sampled": ["False. While clients can consent to a representation where a conflict of interest exists, there are certain situations where the conflict is so severe that it cannot be waived by the client. Additionally, some jurisdictions have specific rules regarding when a conflict can be waived and when it cannot. It is important for lawyers to carefully consider the potential conflicts of interest in each case and to obtain informed consent from their clients when appropriate."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:35.294387+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 11, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.54", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "False", "picked": "False", "sampled": "False. While clients can consent to a representation where a conflict of interest exists, there are certain situations where the conflict is so severe that it cannot be waived by the client. Additionally, some jurisdictions have specific rules regarding when a conflict can be waived and when it cannot. It is important for lawyers to carefully consider the potential conflicts of interest in each case and to obtain informed consent from their clients when appropriate.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:35.294435+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 12, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.9", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer cannot ethically represent a client if they disagree with the client's political, economic, social or moral views related to the matter."}], "sampled": ["False. According to Rule 1.2 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer shall abide by a client's decisions concerning the objectives of representation and shall consult with the client as to the means by which they are to be pursued. Therefore, a lawyer can ethically represent a client even if they disagree with the client's political, economic, social or moral views related to the matter."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:35.405115+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 13, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.9", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "False", "picked": "False", "sampled": "False. According to Rule 1.2 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer shall abide by a client's decisions concerning the objectives of representation and shall consult with the client as to the means by which they are to be pursued. Therefore, a lawyer can ethically represent a client even if they disagree with the client's political, economic, social or moral views related to the matter.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:35.405161+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 14, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.1", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Newly admitted lawyers cannot be as competent as practitioners with long experience."}], "sampled": ["False. The ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct do not make any distinction between newly admitted lawyers and practitioners with long experience in terms of competence. Rule 1.1 requires all lawyers to provide competent representation to their clients, which includes the legal knowledge, skill, thoroughness, and preparation reasonably necessary for the representation. The rule does not make any exceptions based on the lawyer's level of experience. However, it is expected that newly admitted lawyers may need to seek guidance and supervision from more experienced lawyers to ensure they are providing competent representation."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:36.505974+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 15, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.1", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "False", "picked": "False", "sampled": "False. The ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct do not make any distinction between newly admitted lawyers and practitioners with long experience in terms of competence. Rule 1.1 requires all lawyers to provide competent representation to their clients, which includes the legal knowledge, skill, thoroughness, and preparation reasonably necessary for the representation. The rule does not make any exceptions based on the lawyer's level of experience. However, it is expected that newly admitted lawyers may need to seek guidance and supervision from more experienced lawyers to ensure they are providing competent representation.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:36.506032+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 16, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.78", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A prosecutor is obligated to timely disclose favorable evidence to the defense, even if it is inadmissible or has no impact on the outcome of the case."}], "sampled": ["True. According to Rule 3.8 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a prosecutor is obligated to timely disclose to the defense all evidence or information known to the prosecutor that tends to negate the guilt of the accused or mitigates the offense, and in connection with sentencing, disclose to the defense and to the tribunal all unprivileged mitigating information known to the prosecutor, except when the prosecutor is relieved of this responsibility by a protective order of the tribunal. This obligation applies even if the evidence is inadmissible or has no impact on the outcome of the case."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:36.753276+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 17, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.78", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "True", "picked": "True", "sampled": "True. According to Rule 3.8 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a prosecutor is obligated to timely disclose to the defense all evidence or information known to the prosecutor that tends to negate the guilt of the accused or mitigates the offense, and in connection with sentencing, disclose to the defense and to the tribunal all unprivileged mitigating information known to the prosecutor, except when the prosecutor is relieved of this responsibility by a protective order of the tribunal. This obligation applies even if the evidence is inadmissible or has no impact on the outcome of the case.", "options": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:36.753323+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 18, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.67", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer who is a member of a corporation's board of directors must resign from the board or cease acting as the corporation's lawyer when a conflict of interest arises."}], "sampled": ["True. According to Rule 1.7 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer must not represent a client if the representation involves a concurrent conflict of interest. A concurrent conflict of interest exists if there is a significant risk that the representation of one or more clients will be materially limited by the lawyer's responsibilities to another client, a former client, or a third person or by a personal interest of the lawyer. Therefore, if a lawyer who is a member of a corporation's board of directors faces a conflict of interest, they must either resign from the board or cease acting as the corporation's lawyer to avoid a concurrent conflict of interest."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:37.749633+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 19, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.67", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "False", "picked": null, "sampled": "True. According to Rule 1.7 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer must not represent a client if the representation involves a concurrent conflict of interest. A concurrent conflict of interest exists if there is a significant risk that the representation of one or more clients will be materially limited by the lawyer's responsibilities to another client, a former client, or a third person or by a personal interest of the lawyer. Therefore, if a lawyer who is a member of a corporation's board of directors faces a conflict of interest, they must either resign from the board or cease acting as the corporation's lawyer to avoid a concurrent conflict of interest.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:37.749670+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 20, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.83", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Lawyers are allowed to make out-of-court statements that are completely true, but that they reasonably should know have a substantial likelihood of materially prejudicing the case."}], "sampled": ["False. According to Rule 3.6 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, lawyers are prohibited from making out-of-court statements that they know or reasonably should know will have a substantial likelihood of materially prejudicing an adjudicative proceeding. This rule applies even if the statements are completely true."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:37.751792+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 21, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.83", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "False", "picked": "False", "sampled": "False. According to Rule 3.6 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, lawyers are prohibited from making out-of-court statements that they know or reasonably should know will have a substantial likelihood of materially prejudicing an adjudicative proceeding. This rule applies even if the statements are completely true.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:37.751865+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 22, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.30", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer is allowed to reveal information relating to the representation of a client if they believe it is necessary to prevent the client from committing a crime.."}], "sampled": ["True. According to Rule 1.6(b)(1) of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer may reveal information relating to the representation of a client to the extent the lawyer reasonably believes necessary to prevent the client from committing a crime."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:38.386181+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 23, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.30", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "False", "picked": null, "sampled": "True. According to Rule 1.6(b)(1) of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer may reveal information relating to the representation of a client to the extent the lawyer reasonably believes necessary to prevent the client from committing a crime.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:38.386240+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 24, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.3", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer must always prepare for legal problems with which they are not familiar by seeking special training."}], "sampled": ["False. While a lawyer has a duty to provide competent representation to their clients, they are not required to seek special training for every legal problem they may encounter. However, if a lawyer lacks the necessary competence to handle a particular matter, they must either acquire the necessary competence or associate with a lawyer who has the necessary competence. See Rule 1.1 Competence of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:39.556639+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 25, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.3", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "False", "picked": "False", "sampled": "False. While a lawyer has a duty to provide competent representation to their clients, they are not required to seek special training for every legal problem they may encounter. However, if a lawyer lacks the necessary competence to handle a particular matter, they must either acquire the necessary competence or associate with a lawyer who has the necessary competence. See Rule 1.1 Competence of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:39.556700+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 26, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.24", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A contingent fee agreement must be orally agreed upon between the lawyer and client, stating the method by which the fee is to be determined."}], "sampled": ["False. According to Rule 1.5(c) of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a contingent fee agreement must be in writing and must state the method by which the fee is to be determined, including the percentage or percentages that shall accrue to the lawyer in the event of settlement, trial or appeal, litigation and other expenses to be deducted from the recovery, and whether such expenses are to be deducted before or after the contingent fee is calculated."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:39.640342+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 27, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.24", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "False", "picked": "False", "sampled": "False. According to Rule 1.5(c) of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a contingent fee agreement must be in writing and must state the method by which the fee is to be determined, including the percentage or percentages that shall accrue to the lawyer in the event of settlement, trial or appeal, litigation and other expenses to be deducted from the recovery, and whether such expenses are to be deducted before or after the contingent fee is calculated.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:39.640391+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 28, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.56", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the information provided about conflict of interest."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Informed consent requires the client to be aware of the possible effects on loyalty, confidentiality, and the attorney-client privilege when multiple clients are represented in a single matter."}], "sampled": ["True. \n\nInformed consent requires the client to be aware of the possible effects on loyalty, confidentiality, and the attorney-client privilege when multiple clients are represented in a single matter. This is because representing multiple clients in a single matter can create conflicts of interest between the clients, and the attorney has a duty to disclose these potential conflicts to the clients and obtain their informed consent before proceeding with the representation."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:39.798895+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 29, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.56", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "True", "picked": "True", "sampled": "True. \n\nInformed consent requires the client to be aware of the possible effects on loyalty, confidentiality, and the attorney-client privilege when multiple clients are represented in a single matter. This is because representing multiple clients in a single matter can create conflicts of interest between the clients, and the attorney has a duty to disclose these potential conflicts to the clients and obtain their informed consent before proceeding with the representation.", "options": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:39.798967+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 30, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.82", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "An attorney must not act with the sole purpose of delaying, burdening, or embarrassing other parties while obtaining evidence."}], "sampled": ["True. According to Rule 3.4 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer shall not unlawfully obstruct another party's access to evidence or unlawfully alter, destroy or conceal a document or other material having potential evidentiary value. A lawyer shall not counsel or assist another person to do any such act. A lawyer shall not falsify evidence, counsel or assist a witness to testify falsely, or offer an inducement to a witness that is prohibited by law."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:40.189651+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 31, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.82", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "True", "picked": "True", "sampled": "True. According to Rule 3.4 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer shall not unlawfully obstruct another party's access to evidence or unlawfully alter, destroy or conceal a document or other material having potential evidentiary value. A lawyer shall not counsel or assist another person to do any such act. A lawyer shall not falsify evidence, counsel or assist a witness to testify falsely, or offer an inducement to a witness that is prohibited by law.", "options": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:40.189695+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 32, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.50", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer may engage in sexual relationships with a client if the relationship predates the formation of the client-lawyer relationship."}], "sampled": ["False. According to Rule 1.8(j) of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer shall not have sexual relations with a client unless a consensual sexual relationship existed between them when the client-lawyer relationship commenced. Even then, the lawyer must consider whether the relationship will adversely affect the client's representation and obtain the client's informed consent."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:40.926650+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 33, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.50", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "True", "picked": null, "sampled": "False. According to Rule 1.8(j) of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer shall not have sexual relations with a client unless a consensual sexual relationship existed between them when the client-lawyer relationship commenced. Even then, the lawyer must consider whether the relationship will adversely affect the client's representation and obtain the client's informed consent.", "options": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:40.926698+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 34, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.35", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer is prohibited from revealing any information relating to the representation of a client, regardless of the circumstances."}], "sampled": ["False. While a lawyer has a duty to maintain client confidentiality, there are certain circumstances where a lawyer may be required or permitted to reveal information relating to the representation of a client. For example, a lawyer may reveal information with the client's informed consent, to prevent reasonably certain death or substantial bodily harm, or to comply with a court order or other legal obligation. However, a lawyer must always be mindful of their duty to maintain client confidentiality and should only reveal information when necessary and appropriate."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:41.133904+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 35, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.35", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "False", "picked": "False", "sampled": "False. While a lawyer has a duty to maintain client confidentiality, there are certain circumstances where a lawyer may be required or permitted to reveal information relating to the representation of a client. For example, a lawyer may reveal information with the client's informed consent, to prevent reasonably certain death or substantial bodily harm, or to comply with a court order or other legal obligation. However, a lawyer must always be mindful of their duty to maintain client confidentiality and should only reveal information when necessary and appropriate.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:41.133944+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 36, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.72", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer who moves from one firm to another can be screened from participation in a matter, and the new firm can represent a client with adverse interests without obtaining the former client's informed consent."}], "sampled": ["True. According to Rule 1.10 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer who moves from one firm to another can be screened from participation in a matter, and the new firm can represent a client with adverse interests without obtaining the former client's informed consent. However, certain conditions must be met for the screening to be effective, such as timely notice to the former client and certification of compliance with the screening procedures."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:41.668738+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 37, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.72", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "True", "picked": "True", "sampled": "True. According to Rule 1.10 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer who moves from one firm to another can be screened from participation in a matter, and the new firm can represent a client with adverse interests without obtaining the former client's informed consent. However, certain conditions must be met for the screening to be effective, such as timely notice to the former client and certification of compliance with the screening procedures.", "options": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:41.668831+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 38, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.92", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "It is permissible for an attorney to talk to members of the jury before or during a trial, so long as the discussion is not about the trial."}], "sampled": ["False. According to Rule 3.5 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer shall not communicate ex parte with a judge, juror, prospective juror, or other official during the proceeding unless authorized to do so by law or court order. Therefore, an attorney cannot talk to members of the jury before or during a trial, even if the discussion is not about the trial."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:43.589065+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 39, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.92", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "False", "picked": "False", "sampled": "False. According to Rule 3.5 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer shall not communicate ex parte with a judge, juror, prospective juror, or other official during the proceeding unless authorized to do so by law or court order. Therefore, an attorney cannot talk to members of the jury before or during a trial, even if the discussion is not about the trial.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:43.589115+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 40, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.96", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "During the sale of a law practice, the seller must obtain client consent before sharing detailed information about a client's case with the potential buyer."}], "sampled": ["True. According to Rule 1.17 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer who is selling their law practice must obtain client consent before disclosing any information related to a client's representation to a potential buyer. The client must be informed of the sale and must be given the opportunity to object or consent to the transfer of their representation to the buyer. The lawyer must also take reasonable steps to ensure that the buyer agrees to abide by the same confidentiality rules and ethical obligations that apply to the seller."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:43.591211+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 41, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.96", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "True", "picked": "True", "sampled": "True. According to Rule 1.17 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer who is selling their law practice must obtain client consent before disclosing any information related to a client's representation to a potential buyer. The client must be informed of the sale and must be given the opportunity to object or consent to the transfer of their representation to the buyer. The lawyer must also take reasonable steps to ensure that the buyer agrees to abide by the same confidentiality rules and ethical obligations that apply to the seller.", "options": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:43.591249+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 42, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.29", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "When determining the reasonableness of a fee, factors such as the time and labor required, the novelty and difficulty of the questions involved, and the skill requisite to perform the legal service properly should be considered."}], "sampled": ["True. According to Rule 1.5(a) of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, when determining the reasonableness of a fee, a lawyer shall consider factors such as the time and labor required, the novelty and difficulty of the questions involved, and the skill requisite to perform the legal service properly."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:44.020164+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 43, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.29", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "True", "picked": "True", "sampled": "True. According to Rule 1.5(a) of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, when determining the reasonableness of a fee, a lawyer shall consider factors such as the time and labor required, the novelty and difficulty of the questions involved, and the skill requisite to perform the legal service properly.", "options": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:44.020212+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 44, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.62", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer is prohibited from representing multiple parties to a negotiation if their interests are fundamentally antagonistic to each other."}], "sampled": ["True. According to Rule 1.7 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer shall not represent a client if the representation involves a concurrent conflict of interest. A concurrent conflict of interest exists if there is a significant risk that the representation of one or more clients will be materially limited by the lawyer's responsibilities to another client, a former client, or a third person, or by a personal interest of the lawyer. If the interests of the multiple parties to a negotiation are fundamentally antagonistic to each other, then representing them would create a conflict of interest for the lawyer."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:44.125795+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 45, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.62", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "True", "picked": "True", "sampled": "True. According to Rule 1.7 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer shall not represent a client if the representation involves a concurrent conflict of interest. A concurrent conflict of interest exists if there is a significant risk that the representation of one or more clients will be materially limited by the lawyer's responsibilities to another client, a former client, or a third person, or by a personal interest of the lawyer. If the interests of the multiple parties to a negotiation are fundamentally antagonistic to each other, then representing them would create a conflict of interest for the lawyer.", "options": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:44.125845+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 46, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.75", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer's disqualification based on prior work as a law student will result in the disqualification of all other lawyers in the firm."}], "sampled": ["True. According to Rule 1.10 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, if a lawyer is disqualified from representing a client due to a conflict of interest arising from the lawyer's prior work as a law student, the disqualification is imputed to all other lawyers in the firm. This is because the conflict is considered to be imputed to the entire firm, and not just the individual lawyer who has the conflict."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:44.466466+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 47, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.75", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "False", "picked": null, "sampled": "True. According to Rule 1.10 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, if a lawyer is disqualified from representing a client due to a conflict of interest arising from the lawyer's prior work as a law student, the disqualification is imputed to all other lawyers in the firm. This is because the conflict is considered to be imputed to the entire firm, and not just the individual lawyer who has the conflict.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:44.466520+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 48, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.28", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer may charge a contingent fee for representing a defendant in a criminal case."}], "sampled": ["False. According to Rule 1.5(d) of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer shall not enter into an arrangement for, charge, or collect a contingent fee in a criminal case."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:44.529708+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 49, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.28", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "False", "picked": "False", "sampled": "False. According to Rule 1.5(d) of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer shall not enter into an arrangement for, charge, or collect a contingent fee in a criminal case.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:44.529783+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 50, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.45", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer may represent a client with a concurrent conflict of interest without obtaining informed consent from each affected client, as long as the lawyer reasonably believes they can provide competent and diligent representation."}], "sampled": ["False. According to Rule 1.7 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer may represent a client with a concurrent conflict of interest only if the lawyer obtains informed consent from each affected client, confirmed in writing. The lawyer must also reasonably believe that they can provide competent and diligent representation to each affected client despite the conflict of interest."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:45.041174+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 51, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.45", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "False", "picked": "False", "sampled": "False. According to Rule 1.7 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer may represent a client with a concurrent conflict of interest only if the lawyer obtains informed consent from each affected client, confirmed in writing. The lawyer must also reasonably believe that they can provide competent and diligent representation to each affected client despite the conflict of interest.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:45.041222+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 52, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.14", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer's representation of a client does not imply endorsement of the client's views or activities."}], "sampled": ["True. According to Rule 1.2(b) of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer's representation of a client does not constitute an endorsement of the client's political, economic, social, or moral views or activities. A lawyer may represent a client regardless of the lawyer's own views, and the lawyer's professional conduct should not be influenced by the client's views or activities."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:45.056108+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 53, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.14", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "True", "picked": "True", "sampled": "True. According to Rule 1.2(b) of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer's representation of a client does not constitute an endorsement of the client's political, economic, social, or moral views or activities. A lawyer may represent a client regardless of the lawyer's own views, and the lawyer's professional conduct should not be influenced by the client's views or activities.", "options": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:45.056148+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 54, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.53", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A parent who pays for the lawyer's services on behalf of a child may direct or control some of the legal strategy decisions made."}], "sampled": ["False. According to Rule 1.8(f) of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer cannot accept compensation from someone other than the client unless the client gives informed consent, the payment does not interfere with the lawyer's professional judgment or the lawyer-client relationship, and the information relating to the representation of the client is protected as required by Rule 1.6. Therefore, a parent who pays for the lawyer's services on behalf of a child cannot direct or control some of the legal strategy decisions made."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:45.320470+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 55, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.53", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "False", "picked": "False", "sampled": "False. According to Rule 1.8(f) of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer cannot accept compensation from someone other than the client unless the client gives informed consent, the payment does not interfere with the lawyer's professional judgment or the lawyer-client relationship, and the information relating to the representation of the client is protected as required by Rule 1.6. Therefore, a parent who pays for the lawyer's services on behalf of a child cannot direct or control some of the legal strategy decisions made.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:45.320508+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 56, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.12", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer can counsel a client to engage in conduct that the lawyer knows is criminal or fraudulent."}], "sampled": ["False. According to Rule 1.2(d) of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer shall not counsel a client to engage, or assist a client, in conduct that the lawyer knows is criminal or fraudulent."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:46.082265+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 57, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.12", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "False", "picked": "False", "sampled": "False. According to Rule 1.2(d) of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer shall not counsel a client to engage, or assist a client, in conduct that the lawyer knows is criminal or fraudulent.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:46.082309+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 58, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.47", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer may represent clients with economically adverse interests in unrelated matters without obtaining their informed consent."}], "sampled": ["False. According to Rule 1.7 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer shall not represent a client if the representation involves a concurrent conflict of interest. A concurrent conflict of interest exists if there is a significant risk that the representation of one or more clients will be materially limited by the lawyer's responsibilities to another client, a former client, or a third person or by a personal interest of the lawyer. Therefore, a lawyer may not represent clients with economically adverse interests in unrelated matters without obtaining their informed consent."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:46.819898+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 59, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.47", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "True", "picked": null, "sampled": "False. According to Rule 1.7 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer shall not represent a client if the representation involves a concurrent conflict of interest. A concurrent conflict of interest exists if there is a significant risk that the representation of one or more clients will be materially limited by the lawyer's responsibilities to another client, a former client, or a third person or by a personal interest of the lawyer. Therefore, a lawyer may not represent clients with economically adverse interests in unrelated matters without obtaining their informed consent.", "options": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:46.819995+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 60, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.10", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer may limit the scope of representation if it is reasonable and the client gives informed consent."}], "sampled": ["True. According to Rule 1.2(c) of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer may limit the scope of representation if the limitation is reasonable under the circumstances and the client gives informed consent."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:47.221734+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 61, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.10", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "True", "picked": "True", "sampled": "True. According to Rule 1.2(c) of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer may limit the scope of representation if the limitation is reasonable under the circumstances and the client gives informed consent.", "options": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:47.221781+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 62, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.66", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer representing an organization also represents all of its affiliated organizations, such as parent and subsidiary companies."}], "sampled": ["False. According to Rule 1.13 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer representing an organization represents only the organization itself, not its affiliated organizations. However, the lawyer may also represent the organization's directors, officers, employees, members, shareholders, or other constituents, subject to certain limitations."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:47.831502+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 63, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.66", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "False", "picked": "False", "sampled": "False. According to Rule 1.13 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer representing an organization represents only the organization itself, not its affiliated organizations. However, the lawyer may also represent the organization's directors, officers, employees, members, shareholders, or other constituents, subject to certain limitations.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:47.831539+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 64, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.44", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer is permitted to disclose client information if a court or other tribunal orders the disclosure, even without the client's informed consent."}], "sampled": ["True. According to Rule 1.6(b)(6) of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer may disclose client information to comply with a court order or other legal obligation, even if the client has not given informed consent to the disclosure."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:48.160897+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 65, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.44", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "True", "picked": "True", "sampled": "True. According to Rule 1.6(b)(6) of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer may disclose client information to comply with a court order or other legal obligation, even if the client has not given informed consent to the disclosure.", "options": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:48.160941+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 66, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.21", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer must communicate the scope of representation and the basis or rate of the fee and expenses to the client in writing before the representation commences in all cases."}], "sampled": ["True. According to Rule 1.5(b) of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer must communicate the scope of representation and the basis or rate of the fee and expenses to the client in writing before or within a reasonable time after commencing the representation, except when the lawyer will charge a regularly represented client on the same basis or rate."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:48.214452+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 67, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.21", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "False", "picked": null, "sampled": "True. According to Rule 1.5(b) of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer must communicate the scope of representation and the basis or rate of the fee and expenses to the client in writing before or within a reasonable time after commencing the representation, except when the lawyer will charge a regularly represented client on the same basis or rate.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:48.214495+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 68, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.77", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "In ex parte proceedings, an attorney is not required to reveal information that may be harmful to their client's case."}], "sampled": ["False. According to Rule 3.3 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, an attorney has a duty of candor to the tribunal in ex parte proceedings and must disclose any material facts or legal authority that is directly adverse to the client's position. The attorney cannot knowingly make a false statement of fact or law to the tribunal or fail to correct a false statement previously made."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:49.488891+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 69, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.77", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "False", "picked": "False", "sampled": "False. According to Rule 3.3 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, an attorney has a duty of candor to the tribunal in ex parte proceedings and must disclose any material facts or legal authority that is directly adverse to the client's position. The attorney cannot knowingly make a false statement of fact or law to the tribunal or fail to correct a false statement previously made.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:49.488933+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 70, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.59", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the information provided about conflict of interest."}, {"role": "user", "content": "General and open-ended advance consent to future conflicts is considered effective."}], "sampled": ["False. General and open-ended advance consent to future conflicts is not considered effective. Advance consent to future conflicts must be specific and informed to be effective."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:50.188154+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 71, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.59", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "False", "picked": "False", "sampled": "False. General and open-ended advance consent to future conflicts is not considered effective. Advance consent to future conflicts must be specific and informed to be effective.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:50.188227+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 72, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.94", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer may sell certain cases of their law practice and retain others, depending on how valuable they are."}], "sampled": ["True. According to Rule 1.17 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer may sell or purchase a law practice, or an area of a law practice, including good will, if certain conditions are met. One of the conditions is that the seller must cease to engage in the private practice of law, or in the area of practice that has been sold, in the geographic area where the practice has been conducted. Additionally, the sale must be of the entire practice or area of practice, and the clients must be notified of the sale and given the option to retain other counsel or consent to the transfer of their files to the purchasing lawyer."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:50.463514+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 73, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.94", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "False", "picked": null, "sampled": "True. According to Rule 1.17 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer may sell or purchase a law practice, or an area of a law practice, including good will, if certain conditions are met. One of the conditions is that the seller must cease to engage in the private practice of law, or in the area of practice that has been sold, in the geographic area where the practice has been conducted. Additionally, the sale must be of the entire practice or area of practice, and the clients must be notified of the sale and given the option to retain other counsel or consent to the transfer of their files to the purchasing lawyer.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:50.463562+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 74, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.79", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "It is acceptable for an attorney to communicate directly with a person who is represented by counsel on a specific matter without the consent of their counsel."}], "sampled": ["False. According to Rule 4.2 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer shall not communicate about the subject of the representation with a person the lawyer knows to be represented by another lawyer in the matter, unless the lawyer has the consent of the other lawyer or is authorized to do so by law or a court order."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:50.517100+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 75, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.79", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "False", "picked": "False", "sampled": "False. According to Rule 4.2 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer shall not communicate about the subject of the representation with a person the lawyer knows to be represented by another lawyer in the matter, unless the lawyer has the consent of the other lawyer or is authorized to do so by law or a court order.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:50.517206+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 76, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.73", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A law firm is prohibited from representing a client with interests adverse to those of a client represented by a formerly associated lawyer."}], "sampled": ["True. According to Rule 1.9 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a law firm is prohibited from representing a client with interests adverse to those of a client represented by a formerly associated lawyer if the matter is the same or substantially related to that in which the formerly associated lawyer represented the former client and any lawyer remaining in the firm has information protected by Rules 1.6 and 1.9(c) that is material to the matter."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:51.275629+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 77, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.73", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "False", "picked": null, "sampled": "True. According to Rule 1.9 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a law firm is prohibited from representing a client with interests adverse to those of a client represented by a formerly associated lawyer if the matter is the same or substantially related to that in which the formerly associated lawyer represented the former client and any lawyer remaining in the firm has information protected by Rules 1.6 and 1.9(c) that is material to the matter.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:51.275683+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 78, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.84", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "It is acceptable for a prosecutor to make true comments that have a substantial likelihood of heightening public condemnation of the accused."}], "sampled": ["False. According to Rule 3.8 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a prosecutor shall refrain from making extrajudicial comments that have a substantial likelihood of heightening public condemnation of the accused. While a prosecutor may make statements that are necessary to inform the public of the nature and extent of the prosecutor's action and that serve a legitimate law enforcement purpose, the prosecutor should not make statements that have a substantial likelihood of heightening public condemnation of the accused."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:51.312919+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 79, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.84", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "False", "picked": "False", "sampled": "False. According to Rule 3.8 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a prosecutor shall refrain from making extrajudicial comments that have a substantial likelihood of heightening public condemnation of the accused. While a prosecutor may make statements that are necessary to inform the public of the nature and extent of the prosecutor's action and that serve a legitimate law enforcement purpose, the prosecutor should not make statements that have a substantial likelihood of heightening public condemnation of the accused.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:51.312961+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 80, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.63", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer can represent multiple clients with generally aligned interests even if there are some differences in interest among them."}], "sampled": ["True. According to Rule 1.7 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer may represent multiple clients with generally aligned interests even if there are some differences in interest among them, as long as the lawyer reasonably believes that the representation will not be adversely affected and each client consents after consultation. The lawyer must also reasonably believe that the representation will not involve a conflict of interest."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:53.009894+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 81, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.63", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "True", "picked": "True", "sampled": "True. According to Rule 1.7 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer may represent multiple clients with generally aligned interests even if there are some differences in interest among them, as long as the lawyer reasonably believes that the representation will not be adversely affected and each client consents after consultation. The lawyer must also reasonably believe that the representation will not involve a conflict of interest.", "options": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:53.009941+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 82, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.74", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A disqualification prescribed by Rule 1.10 may be waived by the affected client under the conditions stated in Rule 1.7."}], "sampled": ["True. Rule 1.10 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct provides that when a lawyer who formerly represented a client in a matter joins a new firm, the new firm is also disqualified from representing a client in the same or a substantially related matter. However, Rule 1.7 allows a client to waive conflicts of interest under certain conditions, including when the representation is not prohibited by law, the representation does not involve the assertion of a claim by one client against another client represented by the lawyer in the same litigation or other proceeding before a tribunal, and the affected client gives informed consent, confirmed in writing. Therefore, a disqualification prescribed by Rule 1.10 may be waived by the affected client under the conditions stated in Rule 1.7."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:53.312243+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 83, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.74", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "True", "picked": "True", "sampled": "True. Rule 1.10 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct provides that when a lawyer who formerly represented a client in a matter joins a new firm, the new firm is also disqualified from representing a client in the same or a substantially related matter. However, Rule 1.7 allows a client to waive conflicts of interest under certain conditions, including when the representation is not prohibited by law, the representation does not involve the assertion of a claim by one client against another client represented by the lawyer in the same litigation or other proceeding before a tribunal, and the affected client gives informed consent, confirmed in writing. Therefore, a disqualification prescribed by Rule 1.10 may be waived by the affected client under the conditions stated in Rule 1.7.", "options": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:53.312300+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 84, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.23", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer is permitted to enter into a fee arrangement that might induce the lawyer to curtail services for the client or perform them in a way contrary to the client's interest."}], "sampled": ["False. According to Rule 1.5 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer shall not enter into a fee arrangement that is contingent on the outcome of a matter, except in certain circumstances. Additionally, a lawyer shall not enter into a fee arrangement that would involve representing a client in a manner that would be limited by the lawyer's financial interest. Therefore, a lawyer is not permitted to enter into a fee arrangement that might induce the lawyer to curtail services for the client or perform them in a way contrary to the client's interest."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:53.802208+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 85, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.23", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "False", "picked": "False", "sampled": "False. According to Rule 1.5 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer shall not enter into a fee arrangement that is contingent on the outcome of a matter, except in certain circumstances. Additionally, a lawyer shall not enter into a fee arrangement that would involve representing a client in a manner that would be limited by the lawyer's financial interest. Therefore, a lawyer is not permitted to enter into a fee arrangement that might induce the lawyer to curtail services for the client or perform them in a way contrary to the client's interest.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:53.802268+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 86, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.91", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Attorneys must not engage in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation, even in their private business or personal life that is unrelated to the practice of law."}], "sampled": ["True. According to Rule 8.4(c) of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, it is professional misconduct for a lawyer to engage in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation, regardless of whether the conduct is related to the practice of law."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:53.809390+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 87, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.91", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "True", "picked": "True", "sampled": "True. According to Rule 8.4(c) of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, it is professional misconduct for a lawyer to engage in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation, regardless of whether the conduct is related to the practice of law.", "options": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:53.809484+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 88, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.90", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "An attorney has no duty to follow valid procedural rules and court orders that they reasonably believe are defective or invalid."}], "sampled": ["False. An attorney has a duty to follow valid procedural rules and court orders, even if they believe them to be defective or invalid. According to Rule 3.4(c) of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer shall not knowingly disobey an obligation under the rules of a tribunal except for an open refusal based on an assertion that no valid obligation exists."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:54.189088+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 89, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.90", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "False", "picked": "False", "sampled": "False. An attorney has a duty to follow valid procedural rules and court orders, even if they believe them to be defective or invalid. According to Rule 3.4(c) of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer shall not knowingly disobey an obligation under the rules of a tribunal except for an open refusal based on an assertion that no valid obligation exists.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:54.189129+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 90, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.100", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer who sells an area of their practice must cease accepting any matters in that area, including as counsel or co-counsel, after the sale."}], "sampled": ["True. According to Rule 1.17 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer who sells an area of their practice must cease to engage in the private practice of law in that area, or in any manner hold themselves out as a practitioner of that area, after the sale. This includes accepting any matters in that area, including as counsel or co-counsel."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:54.750785+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 91, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.100", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "True", "picked": "True", "sampled": "True. According to Rule 1.17 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer who sells an area of their practice must cease to engage in the private practice of law in that area, or in any manner hold themselves out as a practitioner of that area, after the sale. This includes accepting any matters in that area, including as counsel or co-counsel.", "options": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:54.750847+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 92, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.46", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer is allowed to represent a client if the representation involves asserting a claim by one client against another client represented by the same lawyer in the same litigation."}], "sampled": ["False. According to Rule 1.7 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer shall not represent a client if the representation involves a concurrent conflict of interest. A concurrent conflict of interest exists if there is a significant risk that the representation of one or more clients will be materially limited by the lawyer's responsibilities to another client, a former client or a third person or by a personal interest of the lawyer. Therefore, a lawyer cannot represent a client if the representation involves asserting a claim by one client against another client represented by the same lawyer in the same litigation."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:54.753073+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 93, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.46", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "False", "picked": "False", "sampled": "False. According to Rule 1.7 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer shall not represent a client if the representation involves a concurrent conflict of interest. A concurrent conflict of interest exists if there is a significant risk that the representation of one or more clients will be materially limited by the lawyer's responsibilities to another client, a former client or a third person or by a personal interest of the lawyer. Therefore, a lawyer cannot represent a client if the representation involves asserting a claim by one client against another client represented by the same lawyer in the same litigation.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:54.753124+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 94, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.27", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer is required to return any unearned portion of a fee if the client fires them without warning."}], "sampled": ["True. According to Rule 1.16(d) of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, if a lawyer is discharged by the client, the lawyer must refund any advance payment of fee or expense that has not been earned."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:55.695205+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 95, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.27", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "True", "picked": "True", "sampled": "True. According to Rule 1.16(d) of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, if a lawyer is discharged by the client, the lawyer must refund any advance payment of fee or expense that has not been earned.", "options": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:55.695264+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 96, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.104", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer should aspire to render at least 25 hours of pro bono legal services each year."}], "sampled": ["True. According to Rule 6.1 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer should aspire to render at least 50 hours of pro bono legal services per year, or alternatively, to provide financial support to organizations that provide legal services to persons of limited means. However, the rule also states that a lawyer should render at least 25 hours of pro bono legal services per year."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:56.087586+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 97, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.104", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "False", "picked": null, "sampled": "True. According to Rule 6.1 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer should aspire to render at least 50 hours of pro bono legal services per year, or alternatively, to provide financial support to organizations that provide legal services to persons of limited means. However, the rule also states that a lawyer should render at least 25 hours of pro bono legal services per year.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:56.087629+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 98, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.64", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer must always maintain impartiality between commonly represented clients."}], "sampled": ["True. According to Rule 1.7 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer must not represent a client if the representation involves a concurrent conflict of interest. A concurrent conflict of interest exists if there is a significant risk that the representation of one or more clients will be materially limited by the lawyer's responsibilities to another client, a former client, or a third person, or by a personal interest of the lawyer. Therefore, a lawyer must maintain impartiality between commonly represented clients to avoid a conflict of interest."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:56.215377+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 99, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.64", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "True", "picked": "True", "sampled": "True. According to Rule 1.7 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer must not represent a client if the representation involves a concurrent conflict of interest. A concurrent conflict of interest exists if there is a significant risk that the representation of one or more clients will be materially limited by the lawyer's responsibilities to another client, a former client, or a third person, or by a personal interest of the lawyer. Therefore, a lawyer must maintain impartiality between commonly represented clients to avoid a conflict of interest.", "options": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:56.215425+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 100, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.32", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer is required to reveal information relating to the representation of a client if it is necessary to prevent the client from committing a crime that may result in financial injury to another person."}], "sampled": ["True. According to Rule 1.6(b)(1) of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer may reveal information relating to the representation of a client to the extent the lawyer reasonably believes necessary to prevent the client from committing a crime that is reasonably certain to result in substantial financial injury to another person."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:57.186541+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 101, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.32", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "False", "picked": null, "sampled": "True. According to Rule 1.6(b)(1) of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer may reveal information relating to the representation of a client to the extent the lawyer reasonably believes necessary to prevent the client from committing a crime that is reasonably certain to result in substantial financial injury to another person.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:57.186703+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 102, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.36", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer may disclose information relating to the representation of a client to secure legal advice about the lawyer's compliance with the Rules of Professional Conduct."}], "sampled": ["True. According to Rule 1.6 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer may disclose information relating to the representation of a client to secure legal advice about the lawyer's compliance with the Rules of Professional Conduct."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:58.591706+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 103, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.36", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "True", "picked": "True", "sampled": "True. According to Rule 1.6 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer may disclose information relating to the representation of a client to secure legal advice about the lawyer's compliance with the Rules of Professional Conduct.", "options": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:58.591766+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 104, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.65", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "As between commonly represented clients, the attorney-client privilege does not attach."}], "sampled": ["True. According to Rule 1.7 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer shall not represent a client if the representation involves a concurrent conflict of interest. One of the situations that creates a concurrent conflict of interest is when the representation of one client will be directly adverse to another client, or when there is a significant risk that the representation of one or more clients will be materially limited by the lawyer's responsibilities to another client. In such situations, the lawyer may only represent both clients if the lawyer reasonably believes that the lawyer can competently and diligently represent the interests of both clients, and if both clients give informed consent, confirmed in writing. However, even if both clients consent, the attorney-client privilege does not attach between commonly represented clients."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:59.296654+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 105, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.65", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "True", "picked": "True", "sampled": "True. According to Rule 1.7 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer shall not represent a client if the representation involves a concurrent conflict of interest. One of the situations that creates a concurrent conflict of interest is when the representation of one client will be directly adverse to another client, or when there is a significant risk that the representation of one or more clients will be materially limited by the lawyer's responsibilities to another client. In such situations, the lawyer may only represent both clients if the lawyer reasonably believes that the lawyer can competently and diligently represent the interests of both clients, and if both clients give informed consent, confirmed in writing. However, even if both clients consent, the attorney-client privilege does not attach between commonly represented clients.", "options": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:59.296736+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 106, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.88", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "An attorney must report any attorney or judge's violation of the Rules if it raises a substantial question as to their honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer."}], "sampled": ["True. According to Rule 8.3 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer who knows that another lawyer has committed a violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct that raises a substantial question as to that lawyer's honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer in other respects, must inform the appropriate professional authority. The same rule applies to judges."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:59.374670+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 107, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.88", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "True", "picked": "True", "sampled": "True. According to Rule 8.3 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer who knows that another lawyer has committed a violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct that raises a substantial question as to that lawyer's honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer in other respects, must inform the appropriate professional authority. The same rule applies to judges.", "options": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:59.374720+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 108, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.25", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer may accept property in payment for services, such as an ownership interest in an enterprise, without any limitations or restrictions."}], "sampled": ["False. According to Rule 1.8(a) of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer shall not accept \"ownership, possessory, security, or other pecuniary interest adverse to a client\" unless the client gives informed consent in writing. Additionally, the lawyer must also ensure that the transaction is fair and reasonable to the client and that the client is advised in writing of the desirability of seeking independent legal counsel."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:59.413387+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 109, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.25", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "False", "picked": "False", "sampled": "False. According to Rule 1.8(a) of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer shall not accept \"ownership, possessory, security, or other pecuniary interest adverse to a client\" unless the client gives informed consent in writing. Additionally, the lawyer must also ensure that the transaction is fair and reasonable to the client and that the client is advised in writing of the desirability of seeking independent legal counsel.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:59.413425+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 110, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.81", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer can make false statements of fact to adversaries and third parties."}], "sampled": ["False. According to Rule 4.1 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer shall not knowingly make a false statement of fact or law to a third person. Additionally, Rule 8.4(c) prohibits lawyers from engaging in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation. Therefore, a lawyer cannot make false statements of fact to adversaries and third parties."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:59.475677+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 111, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.81", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "False", "picked": "False", "sampled": "False. According to Rule 4.1 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer shall not knowingly make a false statement of fact or law to a third person. Additionally, Rule 8.4(c) prohibits lawyers from engaging in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation. Therefore, a lawyer cannot make false statements of fact to adversaries and third parties.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:59.475717+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 112, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.41", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer is not required to take any special security measures when transmitting client information if the method of communication affords a reasonable expectation of privacy."}], "sampled": ["True. According to Rule 1.6(c) of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer is required to make reasonable efforts to prevent the inadvertent or unauthorized disclosure of, or unauthorized access to, information relating to the representation of a client. However, the rule also states that the reasonableness of the lawyer's efforts may depend in part on the sensitivity of the information and the likelihood of disclosure if additional safeguards are not employed. Therefore, if the method of communication affords a reasonable expectation of privacy, the lawyer may not be required to take any special security measures."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:59.647719+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 113, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.41", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "True", "picked": "True", "sampled": "True. According to Rule 1.6(c) of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer is required to make reasonable efforts to prevent the inadvertent or unauthorized disclosure of, or unauthorized access to, information relating to the representation of a client. However, the rule also states that the reasonableness of the lawyer's efforts may depend in part on the sensitivity of the information and the likelihood of disclosure if additional safeguards are not employed. Therefore, if the method of communication affords a reasonable expectation of privacy, the lawyer may not be required to take any special security measures.", "options": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:15:59.647778+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 114, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.49", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer is permitted to represent a client in a transaction where the lawyer's own conduct is in question, as long as the lawyer can provide competent and diligent representation."}], "sampled": ["False. According to Rule 1.7 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer shall not represent a client if the representation involves a concurrent conflict of interest. A concurrent conflict of interest exists if there is a significant risk that the representation of one or more clients will be materially limited by the lawyer's own interests or by the lawyer's duties to another client, a former client, or a third person. Therefore, a lawyer cannot represent a client in a transaction where the lawyer's own conduct is in question, as it would create a conflict of interest."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:16:00.382814+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 115, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.49", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "False", "picked": "False", "sampled": "False. According to Rule 1.7 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer shall not represent a client if the representation involves a concurrent conflict of interest. A concurrent conflict of interest exists if there is a significant risk that the representation of one or more clients will be materially limited by the lawyer's own interests or by the lawyer's duties to another client, a former client, or a third person. Therefore, a lawyer cannot represent a client in a transaction where the lawyer's own conduct is in question, as it would create a conflict of interest.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:16:00.382864+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 116, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.80", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A prosecutor has a duty to protect the accused's right to counsel."}], "sampled": ["True. According to Rule 3.8 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a prosecutor has the responsibility of ensuring that the accused is protected from any unauthorized or illegal communication with the prosecutor. The prosecutor should also take appropriate steps to safeguard the accused's right to counsel and should not interfere with the accused's right to counsel."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:16:01.109852+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 117, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.80", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "True", "picked": "True", "sampled": "True. According to Rule 3.8 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a prosecutor has the responsibility of ensuring that the accused is protected from any unauthorized or illegal communication with the prosecutor. The prosecutor should also take appropriate steps to safeguard the accused's right to counsel and should not interfere with the accused's right to counsel.", "options": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:16:01.109889+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 118, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.51", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer who is closely related by blood or marriage to another lawyer may represent a client in a matter where the other lawyer represents another party, without obtaining informed consent from each client."}], "sampled": ["False. According to Rule 1.7 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer shall not represent a client if the representation involves a concurrent conflict of interest. A concurrent conflict of interest exists if there is a significant risk that the representation of one or more clients will be materially limited by the lawyer's responsibilities to another client, a former client, or a third person or by a personal interest of the lawyer. Therefore, a lawyer who is closely related by blood or marriage to another lawyer may represent a client in a matter where the other lawyer represents another party only if the lawyer obtains informed consent from each client after consultation."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:16:02.141972+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 119, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.51", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "False", "picked": "False", "sampled": "False. According to Rule 1.7 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer shall not represent a client if the representation involves a concurrent conflict of interest. A concurrent conflict of interest exists if there is a significant risk that the representation of one or more clients will be materially limited by the lawyer's responsibilities to another client, a former client, or a third person or by a personal interest of the lawyer. Therefore, a lawyer who is closely related by blood or marriage to another lawyer may represent a client in a matter where the other lawyer represents another party only if the lawyer obtains informed consent from each client after consultation.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:16:02.142012+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 120, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.93", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "An attorney may be disciplined for failing to prevent ethical violations of other members of their law firm."}], "sampled": ["True. According to Rule 5.1 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a partner, managing lawyer, or supervisory lawyer may be disciplined for failing to make reasonable efforts to ensure that the firm has measures in place to ensure that all lawyers in the firm conform to the rules of professional conduct."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:16:02.922540+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 121, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.93", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "False", "picked": null, "sampled": "True. According to Rule 5.1 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a partner, managing lawyer, or supervisory lawyer may be disciplined for failing to make reasonable efforts to ensure that the firm has measures in place to ensure that all lawyers in the firm conform to the rules of professional conduct.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:16:02.922598+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 122, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.26", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer may divide a fee with another lawyer who is not in the same firm, even if the client does not agree to the arrangement."}], "sampled": ["False. According to Rule 1.5(e) of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer may only divide a fee with another lawyer who is not in the same firm if the division is in proportion to the services performed by each lawyer or each lawyer assumes joint responsibility for the representation and the client agrees to the arrangement, including the share each lawyer will receive."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:16:03.519247+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 123, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.26", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "False", "picked": "False", "sampled": "False. According to Rule 1.5(e) of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer may only divide a fee with another lawyer who is not in the same firm if the division is in proportion to the services performed by each lawyer or each lawyer assumes joint responsibility for the representation and the client agrees to the arrangement, including the share each lawyer will receive.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:16:03.519295+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 124, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.102", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer is required to render pro bono legal services each year."}], "sampled": ["False. The ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct do not require a lawyer to render pro bono legal services each year. However, Rule 6.1 encourages lawyers to provide pro bono legal services to those who cannot afford them."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:16:03.594069+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 125, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.102", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "False", "picked": "False", "sampled": "False. The ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct do not require a lawyer to render pro bono legal services each year. However, Rule 6.1 encourages lawyers to provide pro bono legal services to those who cannot afford them.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:16:03.594131+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 126, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.105", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer should aspire to render at least 50 hours of pro bono legal services each year."}], "sampled": ["True. According to Rule 6.1 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer should aspire to render at least 50 hours of pro bono legal services each year to clients who are unable to pay, or to charitable, religious, civic, community, governmental and educational organizations in matters that are designed primarily to address the needs of persons of limited means."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:16:03.852204+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 127, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.105", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "True", "picked": "True", "sampled": "True. According to Rule 6.1 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer should aspire to render at least 50 hours of pro bono legal services each year to clients who are unable to pay, or to charitable, religious, civic, community, governmental and educational organizations in matters that are designed primarily to address the needs of persons of limited means.", "options": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:16:03.852268+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 128, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.70", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "When seeking to establish or adjust a relationship between clients, the lawyer's role is that of partisanship normally expected in other circumstances."}], "sampled": ["False. According to Rule 2.4 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, when a lawyer is seeking to establish or adjust a relationship between clients, the lawyer's role is that of a mediator or a facilitator, not that of partisanship normally expected in other circumstances. The lawyer should inform the clients that the lawyer will be acting as a mediator or facilitator and not as an advocate for either client."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:16:03.956657+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 129, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.70", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "False", "picked": "False", "sampled": "False. According to Rule 2.4 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, when a lawyer is seeking to establish or adjust a relationship between clients, the lawyer's role is that of a mediator or a facilitator, not that of partisanship normally expected in other circumstances. The lawyer should inform the clients that the lawyer will be acting as a mediator or facilitator and not as an advocate for either client.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:16:03.956701+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 130, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.69", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer representing multiple clients in the same matter should consider the potential additional cost, embarrassment, and recrimination if the common representation fails."}], "sampled": ["True. According to Rule 1.7 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer must consider the potential risks and benefits of representing multiple clients in the same matter. The lawyer must determine whether there is a significant risk that the representation of one or more clients will be materially limited by the lawyer's responsibilities to another client, or by the lawyer's own interests. If there is a significant risk of material limitation, the lawyer may only represent multiple clients if the lawyer reasonably believes that the representation will not be adversely affected and if each affected client gives informed consent, confirmed in writing. The rule also requires the lawyer to consider the potential additional cost, embarrassment, and recrimination if the common representation fails."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:16:04.492780+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 131, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.69", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "True", "picked": "True", "sampled": "True. According to Rule 1.7 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer must consider the potential risks and benefits of representing multiple clients in the same matter. The lawyer must determine whether there is a significant risk that the representation of one or more clients will be materially limited by the lawyer's responsibilities to another client, or by the lawyer's own interests. If there is a significant risk of material limitation, the lawyer may only represent multiple clients if the lawyer reasonably believes that the representation will not be adversely affected and if each affected client gives informed consent, confirmed in writing. The rule also requires the lawyer to consider the potential additional cost, embarrassment, and recrimination if the common representation fails.", "options": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:16:04.492826+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 132, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.60", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the information provided about conflict of interest."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer may not take inconsistent legal positions in different tribunals at different times on behalf of different clients."}], "sampled": ["True. A lawyer may not take inconsistent legal positions in different tribunals at different times on behalf of different clients. This is because it creates a conflict of interest between the clients and undermines the lawyer's duty of loyalty and commitment to each client."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:16:04.516120+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 133, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.60", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "False", "picked": null, "sampled": "True. A lawyer may not take inconsistent legal positions in different tribunals at different times on behalf of different clients. This is because it creates a conflict of interest between the clients and undermines the lawyer's duty of loyalty and commitment to each client.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:16:04.516167+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 134, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.38", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer must disclose unprotected information relating to the representation of a client, even if the disclosure could reasonably lead to the discovery of protected information by a third party."}], "sampled": ["False. A lawyer must not disclose protected information relating to the representation of a client unless the client gives informed consent, the disclosure is impliedly authorized to carry out the representation, or the disclosure is permitted by one of the exceptions to the duty of confidentiality under Rule 1.6 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct. However, a lawyer may disclose unprotected information relating to the representation of a client if the disclosure is for the benefit of the client and is not otherwise prohibited by law or the rules of professional conduct."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:16:04.797037+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 135, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.38", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "False", "picked": "False", "sampled": "False. A lawyer must not disclose protected information relating to the representation of a client unless the client gives informed consent, the disclosure is impliedly authorized to carry out the representation, or the disclosure is permitted by one of the exceptions to the duty of confidentiality under Rule 1.6 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct. However, a lawyer may disclose unprotected information relating to the representation of a client if the disclosure is for the benefit of the client and is not otherwise prohibited by law or the rules of professional conduct.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:16:04.797078+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 136, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.39", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer is allowed to disclose information relating to a client's representation to detect and resolve conflicts of interest without the client's consent."}], "sampled": ["True. According to Rule 1.6(b)(6) of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer may disclose information relating to the representation of a client to the extent the lawyer reasonably believes necessary to detect and resolve conflicts of interest arising from the lawyer's change of employment or from changes in the composition or ownership of a firm, but only if the revealed information would not compromise the attorney-client privilege or otherwise prejudice the client."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:16:05.003369+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 137, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.39", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "True", "picked": "True", "sampled": "True. According to Rule 1.6(b)(6) of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer may disclose information relating to the representation of a client to the extent the lawyer reasonably believes necessary to detect and resolve conflicts of interest arising from the lawyer's change of employment or from changes in the composition or ownership of a firm, but only if the revealed information would not compromise the attorney-client privilege or otherwise prejudice the client.", "options": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:16:05.003406+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 138, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.33", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer may reveal information relating to the representation of a client to detect and resolve conflicts of interest arising from changes in the composition or ownership of a firm, even if the revealed information would compromise the attorney-client privilege."}], "sampled": ["True. According to Rule 1.6(b)(6) of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer may reveal information relating to the representation of a client to detect and resolve conflicts of interest arising from changes in the composition or ownership of a firm, even if the revealed information would otherwise be protected by the attorney-client privilege."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:16:05.956647+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 139, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.33", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "False", "picked": null, "sampled": "True. According to Rule 1.6(b)(6) of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer may reveal information relating to the representation of a client to detect and resolve conflicts of interest arising from changes in the composition or ownership of a firm, even if the revealed information would otherwise be protected by the attorney-client privilege.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:16:05.956686+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 140, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.61", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the information provided about conflict of interest."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer is required to obtain informed consent from a client, confirmed in writing, when there is a potential conflict of interest."}], "sampled": ["True. A lawyer is required to obtain informed consent from a client, confirmed in writing, when there is a potential conflict of interest. This is to ensure that the client is aware of the potential conflict and has agreed to the lawyer's representation despite the conflict. Failure to obtain informed consent can result in disciplinary action against the lawyer."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:16:06.448646+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 141, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.61", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "False", "picked": null, "sampled": "True. A lawyer is required to obtain informed consent from a client, confirmed in writing, when there is a potential conflict of interest. This is to ensure that the client is aware of the potential conflict and has agreed to the lawyer's representation despite the conflict. Failure to obtain informed consent can result in disciplinary action against the lawyer.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:16:06.448696+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 142, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.86", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Attorneys have an affirmative duty to expedite cases and should not delay cases for their own personal gain or convenience."}], "sampled": ["True. According to Rule 3.2 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer shall make reasonable efforts to expedite litigation consistent with the interests of the client. Lawyers should not delay cases for their own personal gain or convenience."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:16:06.830513+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 143, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.86", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "True", "picked": "True", "sampled": "True. According to Rule 3.2 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer shall make reasonable efforts to expedite litigation consistent with the interests of the client. Lawyers should not delay cases for their own personal gain or convenience.", "options": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:16:06.830550+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 144, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.37", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer is allowed to reveal information relating to the representation of a client to establish a defense in a controversy between the lawyer and the client."}], "sampled": ["True. According to Rule 1.6(b)(5) of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer may reveal information relating to the representation of a client to the extent the lawyer reasonably believes necessary to establish a defense to a criminal charge, civil claim or disciplinary complaint against the lawyer arising from conduct in which the client was involved."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:16:07.857915+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 145, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.37", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "True", "picked": "True", "sampled": "True. According to Rule 1.6(b)(5) of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer may reveal information relating to the representation of a client to the extent the lawyer reasonably believes necessary to establish a defense to a criminal charge, civil claim or disciplinary complaint against the lawyer arising from conduct in which the client was involved.", "options": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:16:07.857958+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 146, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.2", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "In an emergency, a lawyer is allowed to provide assistance in a matter even if they do not have the ordinarily required skill."}], "sampled": ["True. According to Rule 1.1 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer must provide competent representation to a client. However, Comment [2] to the rule states that in an emergency a lawyer may give advice or assistance in a matter in which the lawyer does not have the skill ordinarily required where referral to or consultation or association with another lawyer would be impractical."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:16:08.222101+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 147, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.2", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "True", "picked": "True", "sampled": "True. According to Rule 1.1 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer must provide competent representation to a client. However, Comment [2] to the rule states that in an emergency a lawyer may give advice or assistance in a matter in which the lawyer does not have the skill ordinarily required where referral to or consultation or association with another lawyer would be impractical.", "options": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:16:08.222141+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 148, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.16", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "When a lawyer discovers that their client's ongoing conduct is criminal or fraudulent, the lawyer must report the client to the authorities."}], "sampled": ["False. According to Rule 1.6 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer must maintain client confidentiality unless the client gives informed consent, the disclosure is impliedly authorized to carry out the representation, or the disclosure is required by law or court order. Therefore, a lawyer is generally prohibited from reporting a client's criminal or fraudulent conduct to the authorities without the client's consent, unless the lawyer's services were used in furtherance of the crime or fraud."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:16:09.701058+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 149, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.16", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "False", "picked": "False", "sampled": "False. According to Rule 1.6 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer must maintain client confidentiality unless the client gives informed consent, the disclosure is impliedly authorized to carry out the representation, or the disclosure is required by law or court order. Therefore, a lawyer is generally prohibited from reporting a client's criminal or fraudulent conduct to the authorities without the client's consent, unless the lawyer's services were used in furtherance of the crime or fraud.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:16:09.701184+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 150, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.57", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the information provided about conflict of interest."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A client who has given consent to a conflict cannot revoke the consent or terminate the lawyer's representation at any time."}], "sampled": ["False. A client who has given consent to a conflict can revoke the consent or terminate the lawyer's representation at any time. However, the revocation or termination may be subject to contractual or ethical obligations, and the lawyer may be entitled to compensation for services rendered up to that point."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:16:09.707612+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 151, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.57", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "False", "picked": "False", "sampled": "False. A client who has given consent to a conflict can revoke the consent or terminate the lawyer's representation at any time. However, the revocation or termination may be subject to contractual or ethical obligations, and the lawyer may be entitled to compensation for services rendered up to that point.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:16:09.707662+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 152, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.5", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "An attorney may consult with lawyers outside of the attorney's firm on the client's case without telling the client."}], "sampled": ["False. According to Rule 1.4 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, an attorney must keep the client reasonably informed about the status of the matter and must explain a matter to the extent reasonably necessary to permit the client to make informed decisions regarding the representation. Therefore, an attorney must inform the client if they plan to consult with lawyers outside of the attorney's firm on the client's case."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:16:09.720754+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 153, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.5", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "False", "picked": "False", "sampled": "False. According to Rule 1.4 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, an attorney must keep the client reasonably informed about the status of the matter and must explain a matter to the extent reasonably necessary to permit the client to make informed decisions regarding the representation. Therefore, an attorney must inform the client if they plan to consult with lawyers outside of the attorney's firm on the client's case.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:16:09.720815+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 154, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.18", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer is prohibited from discussing the legal consequences of a proposed course of conduct with a client if that conduct is clearly criminal."}], "sampled": ["False. A lawyer may discuss the legal consequences of any proposed course of conduct with a client, even if that conduct is clearly criminal. However, the lawyer must advise the client regarding the legal consequences of the proposed course of conduct and may not assist the client in committing a crime or fraud. Rule 1.2(d) of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct states that \"a lawyer shall not counsel a client to engage, or assist a client, in conduct that the lawyer knows is criminal or fraudulent.\""]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:16:09.736803+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 155, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.18", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "False", "picked": "False", "sampled": "False. A lawyer may discuss the legal consequences of any proposed course of conduct with a client, even if that conduct is clearly criminal. However, the lawyer must advise the client regarding the legal consequences of the proposed course of conduct and may not assist the client in committing a crime or fraud. Rule 1.2(d) of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct states that \"a lawyer shall not counsel a client to engage, or assist a client, in conduct that the lawyer knows is criminal or fraudulent.\"", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:16:09.736856+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 156, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.103", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer should aspire to render at least 10 hours of pro bono legal services each year."}], "sampled": ["True. According to Rule 6.1 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer should aspire to render at least 50 hours of pro bono legal services per year to clients who are unable to pay, or to participate in activities that improve the law and legal profession's quality. However, the rule also states that a lawyer's pro bono service should not be viewed as a substitute for the government's funding of legal services for the poor."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:16:10.164643+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 157, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.103", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "False", "picked": null, "sampled": "True. According to Rule 6.1 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer should aspire to render at least 50 hours of pro bono legal services per year to clients who are unable to pay, or to participate in activities that improve the law and legal profession's quality. However, the rule also states that a lawyer's pro bono service should not be viewed as a substitute for the government's funding of legal services for the poor.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:16:10.164733+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 158, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.40", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer must take reasonable efforts to prevent unauthorized access to or disclosure of client information, even if the lawyer is not at fault for the unauthorized access or disclosure."}], "sampled": ["True. According to Rule 1.6(c) of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer must make reasonable efforts to prevent the unauthorized disclosure of, or unauthorized access to, information relating to the representation of a client. This duty applies even if the lawyer is not at fault for the unauthorized access or disclosure."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:16:10.487713+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 159, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.40", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "True", "picked": "True", "sampled": "True. According to Rule 1.6(c) of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer must make reasonable efforts to prevent the unauthorized disclosure of, or unauthorized access to, information relating to the representation of a client. This duty applies even if the lawyer is not at fault for the unauthorized access or disclosure.", "options": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:16:10.487760+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 160, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.85", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer must self-report when they know they have violated the rules of professional conduct."}], "sampled": ["True. According to Rule 8.3 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer who knows that another lawyer has committed a violation of the Rules that raises a substantial question as to that lawyer's honesty, trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer in other respects, must inform the appropriate professional authority. Additionally, a lawyer who knows that they have committed a violation of the Rules that raises a substantial question as to their own honesty, trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer in other respects, must self-report to the appropriate professional authority."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:16:10.508560+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 161, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.85", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "False", "picked": null, "sampled": "True. According to Rule 8.3 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer who knows that another lawyer has committed a violation of the Rules that raises a substantial question as to that lawyer's honesty, trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer in other respects, must inform the appropriate professional authority. Additionally, a lawyer who knows that they have committed a violation of the Rules that raises a substantial question as to their own honesty, trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer in other respects, must self-report to the appropriate professional authority.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:16:10.508599+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 162, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.101", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer selling their practice is allowed to share client confidences with the potential buyer without client consent during preliminary negotiations."}], "sampled": ["False. According to Rule 1.17 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer selling their practice may disclose to the potential buyer only the information necessary to allow the buyer to evaluate the proposed transaction. The disclosure of any client confidences or secrets requires the informed consent of the affected clients. Therefore, a lawyer cannot disclose client confidences during preliminary negotiations without client consent."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:16:12.349882+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 163, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.101", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "True", "picked": null, "sampled": "False. According to Rule 1.17 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer selling their practice may disclose to the potential buyer only the information necessary to allow the buyer to evaluate the proposed transaction. The disclosure of any client confidences or secrets requires the informed consent of the affected clients. Therefore, a lawyer cannot disclose client confidences during preliminary negotiations without client consent.", "options": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:16:12.349941+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 164, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.8", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Maintaining competence does not require a lawyer to keep abreast of changes in the law and its practice."}], "sampled": ["False. According to Rule 1.1 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer must provide competent representation to a client, which requires the legal knowledge, skill, thoroughness, and preparation reasonably necessary for the representation. Comment [8] to this rule states that maintaining competence includes keeping abreast of changes in the law and its practice, including the benefits and risks associated with relevant technology."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:16:12.511214+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 165, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.8", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "False", "picked": "False", "sampled": "False. According to Rule 1.1 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer must provide competent representation to a client, which requires the legal knowledge, skill, thoroughness, and preparation reasonably necessary for the representation. Comment [8] to this rule states that maintaining competence includes keeping abreast of changes in the law and its practice, including the benefits and risks associated with relevant technology.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:16:12.511273+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 166, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.76", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "An attorney is allowed to touch and move contraband on behalf of the client."}], "sampled": ["False. An attorney is not allowed to touch or move contraband on behalf of the client. Rule 1.2(d) of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct prohibits a lawyer from assisting a client in conduct that the lawyer knows is criminal or fraudulent. Handling contraband would likely be considered criminal conduct, and therefore, an attorney cannot assist a client in such conduct."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:16:13.899294+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 167, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.76", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "False", "picked": "False", "sampled": "False. An attorney is not allowed to touch or move contraband on behalf of the client. Rule 1.2(d) of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct prohibits a lawyer from assisting a client in conduct that the lawyer knows is criminal or fraudulent. Handling contraband would likely be considered criminal conduct, and therefore, an attorney cannot assist a client in such conduct.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:16:13.899342+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 168, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.31", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer is allowed to reveal information relating to the representation of a client if they believe it is necessary to prevent the client from committing a crime that may result in financial injury to another person."}], "sampled": ["True. According to Rule 1.6(b)(1) of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer may reveal information relating to the representation of a client to the extent the lawyer reasonably believes necessary to prevent the client from committing a crime that is reasonably certain to result in substantial financial injury to another person."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:16:14.126111+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 169, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.31", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "True", "picked": "True", "sampled": "True. According to Rule 1.6(b)(1) of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer may reveal information relating to the representation of a client to the extent the lawyer reasonably believes necessary to prevent the client from committing a crime that is reasonably certain to result in substantial financial injury to another person.", "options": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:16:14.126162+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 170, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.107", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer shall not represent anyone in connection with a matter in which the lawyer participated personally and substantially as a judge or other adjudicative officer or law clerk to such a person or as an arbitrator, mediator or other third-party neutral, unless 3 years have passed after the laywer's last point of involvement."}], "sampled": ["True. According to Rule 1.12 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer shall not represent anyone in connection with a matter in which the lawyer participated personally and substantially as a judge or other adjudicative officer or law clerk to such a person or as an arbitrator, mediator or other third-party neutral, unless 3 years have passed after the lawyer's last point of involvement."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:16:14.218905+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 171, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.107", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "False", "picked": null, "sampled": "True. According to Rule 1.12 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer shall not represent anyone in connection with a matter in which the lawyer participated personally and substantially as a judge or other adjudicative officer or law clerk to such a person or as an arbitrator, mediator or other third-party neutral, unless 3 years have passed after the lawyer's last point of involvement.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:16:14.218953+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 172, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.89", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A subordinate lawyer who follows an order to take an action in violation of the Rules is not subject to discipline if the ethical responsibility is debatable."}], "sampled": ["False. According to Rule 5.2 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a subordinate lawyer is still subject to discipline for violating the Rules even if they were following the orders of a supervising lawyer. The fact that the ethical responsibility is debatable does not excuse a lawyer's violation of the Rules."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:16:14.394675+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 173, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.89", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "True", "picked": null, "sampled": "False. According to Rule 5.2 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a subordinate lawyer is still subject to discipline for violating the Rules even if they were following the orders of a supervising lawyer. The fact that the ethical responsibility is debatable does not excuse a lawyer's violation of the Rules.", "options": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:16:14.394727+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 174, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.0", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer with general experience not considered competent to handle a case involving a specialized field of law."}], "sampled": ["True. According to Rule 1.1 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer shall provide competent representation to a client. Competent representation requires the legal knowledge, skill, thoroughness and preparation reasonably necessary for the representation. If a lawyer lacks the necessary competence to handle a case involving a specialized field of law, the lawyer should either acquire the necessary competence or associate with a lawyer who is competent in that field."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:16:14.725456+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 175, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.0", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "False", "picked": null, "sampled": "True. According to Rule 1.1 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer shall provide competent representation to a client. Competent representation requires the legal knowledge, skill, thoroughness and preparation reasonably necessary for the representation. If a lawyer lacks the necessary competence to handle a case involving a specialized field of law, the lawyer should either acquire the necessary competence or associate with a lawyer who is competent in that field.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:16:14.725512+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 176, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.87", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A licensed attorney may practice law in a jurisdiction where they are not licensed in an emergency situation if it can avoid a substantial injustice."}], "sampled": ["True. According to Rule 5.5(b)(1) of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer who is not admitted to practice in a jurisdiction may provide legal services on a temporary basis in that jurisdiction if the services are in association with a lawyer who is admitted to practice in the jurisdiction and who actively participates in the matter, or if the services arise out of or are reasonably related to the lawyer's practice in a jurisdiction in which the lawyer is admitted to practice. Additionally, under Rule 8.5(a), a lawyer is subject to the disciplinary authority of the jurisdiction where the lawyer's conduct occurred, as well as the jurisdiction where the lawyer is admitted to practice, and may be subject to discipline in either jurisdiction for conduct that violates the rules of professional conduct in either jurisdiction."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:16:15.271530+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 177, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.87", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "False", "picked": null, "sampled": "True. According to Rule 5.5(b)(1) of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer who is not admitted to practice in a jurisdiction may provide legal services on a temporary basis in that jurisdiction if the services are in association with a lawyer who is admitted to practice in the jurisdiction and who actively participates in the matter, or if the services arise out of or are reasonably related to the lawyer's practice in a jurisdiction in which the lawyer is admitted to practice. Additionally, under Rule 8.5(a), a lawyer is subject to the disciplinary authority of the jurisdiction where the lawyer's conduct occurred, as well as the jurisdiction where the lawyer is admitted to practice, and may be subject to discipline in either jurisdiction for conduct that violates the rules of professional conduct in either jurisdiction.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:16:15.271594+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 178, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.95", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer who sells their entire practice may subsequently work as in-house counsel for a business."}], "sampled": ["True. \n\nAccording to Rule 1.17 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer may sell their entire practice, including goodwill, if certain conditions are met. One of those conditions is that the seller may not \"engage in the private practice of law\" after the sale, except for certain limited circumstances, such as working as in-house counsel for a purchaser of the practice. Therefore, a lawyer who sells their entire practice may subsequently work as in-house counsel for a business."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:16:15.564748+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 179, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.95", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "True", "picked": "True", "sampled": "True. \n\nAccording to Rule 1.17 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer may sell their entire practice, including goodwill, if certain conditions are met. One of those conditions is that the seller may not \"engage in the private practice of law\" after the sale, except for certain limited circumstances, such as working as in-house counsel for a purchaser of the practice. Therefore, a lawyer who sells their entire practice may subsequently work as in-house counsel for a business.", "options": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:16:15.564864+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 180, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.55", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the information provided about conflict of interest."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Representation is prohibited if the lawyer cannot reasonably conclude that they will be able to provide competent and diligent representation."}], "sampled": ["True. According to the American Bar Association's Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer shall not represent a client if the representation involves a concurrent conflict of interest. A concurrent conflict of interest exists if the representation of one client will be directly adverse to another client, or if there is a significant risk that the lawyer's ability to consider, recommend, or carry out an appropriate course of action for the client will be materially limited by the lawyer's responsibilities to another client, a former client, or a third person or by a personal interest of the lawyer. Representation is prohibited if the lawyer cannot reasonably conclude that they will be able to provide competent and diligent representation."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:16:16.254696+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 181, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.55", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "True", "picked": "True", "sampled": "True. According to the American Bar Association's Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer shall not represent a client if the representation involves a concurrent conflict of interest. A concurrent conflict of interest exists if the representation of one client will be directly adverse to another client, or if there is a significant risk that the lawyer's ability to consider, recommend, or carry out an appropriate course of action for the client will be materially limited by the lawyer's responsibilities to another client, a former client, or a third person or by a personal interest of the lawyer. Representation is prohibited if the lawyer cannot reasonably conclude that they will be able to provide competent and diligent representation.", "options": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:16:16.254738+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 182, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.17", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer may provide limited representation to a client as long as the limitation is reasonable and the client is properly informed."}], "sampled": ["True. According to Rule 1.2(c) of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer may limit the scope of representation if the limitation is reasonable under the circumstances and the client gives informed consent."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:16:16.781775+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 183, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.17", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "True", "picked": "True", "sampled": "True. According to Rule 1.2(c) of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer may limit the scope of representation if the limitation is reasonable under the circumstances and the client gives informed consent.", "options": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:16:16.781841+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 184, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.106", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer should aspire to render at least 100 hours of pro bono legal services each year."}], "sampled": ["True. According to Rule 6.1 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer should aspire to render at least 50 hours of pro bono legal services each year, and may also fulfill this aspiration by providing financial support to organizations that provide legal services to persons of limited means. However, some states have adopted a higher aspirational goal of 100 hours of pro bono service per year."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:16:16.790107+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 185, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.106", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "False", "picked": null, "sampled": "True. According to Rule 6.1 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer should aspire to render at least 50 hours of pro bono legal services each year, and may also fulfill this aspiration by providing financial support to organizations that provide legal services to persons of limited means. However, some states have adopted a higher aspirational goal of 100 hours of pro bono service per year.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:16:16.790152+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 186, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.97", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "If a client does not respond within 60 days after receiving notice of the proposed sale of their lawyer's practice, their consent to the transfer of their files is presumed."}], "sampled": ["True. According to Rule 1.17(b) of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, if a client does not object to the proposed sale of their lawyer's practice within 60 days after receiving notice, their consent to the transfer of their files is presumed."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:16:17.024083+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 187, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.97", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "False", "picked": null, "sampled": "True. According to Rule 1.17(b) of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, if a client does not object to the proposed sale of their lawyer's practice within 60 days after receiving notice, their consent to the transfer of their files is presumed.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:16:17.024131+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 188, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.99", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "It is a violation of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct for a lawyer to sell only a specific area of their law practice."}], "sampled": ["True. According to Rule 1.17 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer may sell a law practice or an area of a law practice, but only if certain conditions are met. One of those conditions is that the entire practice or area of practice must be sold, and not just a specific part of it. Therefore, it would be a violation of the rules for a lawyer to sell only a specific area of their law practice."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:16:17.388910+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 189, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.99", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "False", "picked": null, "sampled": "True. According to Rule 1.17 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer may sell a law practice or an area of a law practice, but only if certain conditions are met. One of those conditions is that the entire practice or area of practice must be sold, and not just a specific part of it. Therefore, it would be a violation of the rules for a lawyer to sell only a specific area of their law practice.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:16:17.388958+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 190, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.20", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer is permitted to charge a contingent fee in a domestic relations matter, where the payment is contingent upon the securing of a divorce or the amount of alimony or support, when the client is unable to pay otherwise."}], "sampled": ["True. According to Rule 1.5(c) of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer may charge a contingent fee in a domestic relations matter, but only if the fee is reasonable and the client is unable to pay a reasonable fee otherwise. However, the rule prohibits contingent fees in certain domestic relations matters, such as child custody and visitation cases."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:16:18.437366+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 191, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.20", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "False", "picked": null, "sampled": "True. According to Rule 1.5(c) of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer may charge a contingent fee in a domestic relations matter, but only if the fee is reasonable and the client is unable to pay a reasonable fee otherwise. However, the rule prohibits contingent fees in certain domestic relations matters, such as child custody and visitation cases.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:16:18.437402+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 192, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.42", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "The duty of confidentiality ends when the client-lawyer relationship is terminated."}], "sampled": ["False. The duty of confidentiality continues even after the termination of the client-lawyer relationship. According to Rule 1.9(c)(2) of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer shall not use information relating to the representation of a former client to the disadvantage of the former client unless the information has become generally known."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:16:19.177203+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 193, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.42", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "False", "picked": "False", "sampled": "False. The duty of confidentiality continues even after the termination of the client-lawyer relationship. According to Rule 1.9(c)(2) of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer shall not use information relating to the representation of a former client to the disadvantage of the former client unless the information has become generally known.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:16:19.177262+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 194, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.71", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "In a law firm, a lawyer's disqualification due to a personal interest will result in the disqualification of all other lawyers in the firm."}], "sampled": ["True. According to Rule 1.10 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, if a lawyer is disqualified from representing a client due to a personal interest, then all other lawyers in the same firm are also disqualified from representing that client in the same matter, unless the affected client gives informed consent, confirmed in writing."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:16:19.350676+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 195, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.71", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "False", "picked": null, "sampled": "True. According to Rule 1.10 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, if a lawyer is disqualified from representing a client due to a personal interest, then all other lawyers in the same firm are also disqualified from representing that client in the same matter, unless the affected client gives informed consent, confirmed in writing.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:16:19.350737+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 196, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.109", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer shall not represent anyone in connection with a matter in which the lawyer participated personally and substantially as a judge or other adjudicative officer or law clerk to such a person or as an arbitrator, mediator or other third-party neutral, unless 10 years have passed after the laywer's last point of involvement."}], "sampled": ["True. According to Rule 1.12 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer shall not represent anyone in connection with a matter in which the lawyer participated personally and substantially as a judge or other adjudicative officer or law clerk to such a person or as an arbitrator, mediator or other third-party neutral, unless all parties to the proceeding give informed consent, confirmed in writing, or 10 years have passed after the lawyer's last point of involvement."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:16:19.589451+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 197, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.109", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "False", "picked": null, "sampled": "True. According to Rule 1.12 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer shall not represent anyone in connection with a matter in which the lawyer participated personally and substantially as a judge or other adjudicative officer or law clerk to such a person or as an arbitrator, mediator or other third-party neutral, unless all parties to the proceeding give informed consent, confirmed in writing, or 10 years have passed after the lawyer's last point of involvement.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:16:19.589509+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 198, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.43", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer must always appeal an adverse ruling regarding disclosure of client information, regardless of the client's wishes."}], "sampled": ["False. A lawyer must make reasonable efforts to prevent the disclosure of confidential client information, but if an adverse ruling is made, the lawyer must abide by the client's decision regarding whether to appeal the ruling or not. Rule 1.6 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct states that a lawyer must maintain client confidentiality unless the client gives informed consent, the disclosure is impliedly authorized to carry out the representation, or an exception to confidentiality applies."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:16:19.795988+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 199, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.43", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "False", "picked": "False", "sampled": "False. A lawyer must make reasonable efforts to prevent the disclosure of confidential client information, but if an adverse ruling is made, the lawyer must abide by the client's decision regarding whether to appeal the ruling or not. Rule 1.6 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct states that a lawyer must maintain client confidentiality unless the client gives informed consent, the disclosure is impliedly authorized to carry out the representation, or an exception to confidentiality applies.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:16:19.796047+00:00"}
+{"final_report": {"accuracy": 0.7}}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 200, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.4", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer cannot accept representation if they do not currently possess the required level of competence."}], "sampled": ["True. According to Rule 1.1 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer shall provide competent representation to a client. Competent representation requires the legal knowledge, skill, thoroughness, and preparation reasonably necessary for the representation. Therefore, a lawyer cannot accept representation if they do not currently possess the required level of competence."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:16:20.495702+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 201, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.4", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "False", "picked": null, "sampled": "True. According to Rule 1.1 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer shall provide competent representation to a client. Competent representation requires the legal knowledge, skill, thoroughness, and preparation reasonably necessary for the representation. Therefore, a lawyer cannot accept representation if they do not currently possess the required level of competence.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:16:20.495763+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 202, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.48", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer's duty of loyalty and independent judgment can be materially limited by responsibilities to a former client."}], "sampled": ["True. According to Rule 1.9 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer's duty of loyalty and independent judgment can be materially limited by responsibilities to a former client. Specifically, a lawyer who has formerly represented a client in a matter shall not thereafter represent another person in the same or a substantially related matter in which that person's interests are materially adverse to the interests of the former client unless the former client gives informed consent, confirmed in writing."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:16:21.579358+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 203, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.48", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "True", "picked": "True", "sampled": "True. According to Rule 1.9 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer's duty of loyalty and independent judgment can be materially limited by responsibilities to a former client. Specifically, a lawyer who has formerly represented a client in a matter shall not thereafter represent another person in the same or a substantially related matter in which that person's interests are materially adverse to the interests of the former client unless the former client gives informed consent, confirmed in writing.", "options": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:16:21.579407+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 204, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.108", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer shall not represent anyone in connection with a matter in which the lawyer participated personally and substantially as a judge or other adjudicative officer or law clerk to such a person or as an arbitrator, mediator or other third-party neutral, unless 5 years have passed after the laywer's last point of involvement."}], "sampled": ["True. According to Rule 1.12 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer shall not represent anyone in connection with a matter in which the lawyer participated personally and substantially as a judge or other adjudicative officer or law clerk to such a person or as an arbitrator, mediator or other third-party neutral, unless 5 years have passed after the lawyer's last point of involvement."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:16:21.755057+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 205, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.108", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "False", "picked": null, "sampled": "True. According to Rule 1.12 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer shall not represent anyone in connection with a matter in which the lawyer participated personally and substantially as a judge or other adjudicative officer or law clerk to such a person or as an arbitrator, mediator or other third-party neutral, unless 5 years have passed after the lawyer's last point of involvement.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:16:21.755100+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 206, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.13", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer can counsel a client regarding the consequences of conduct that the lawyer knows is criminal or fraudulent."}], "sampled": ["False. According to Rule 1.2(d) of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer shall not counsel a client to engage, or assist a client, in conduct that the lawyer knows is criminal or fraudulent. However, a lawyer may discuss the legal consequences of any proposed course of conduct with a client and may counsel or assist a client to make a good faith effort to determine the validity, scope, meaning, or application of the law."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:16:21.862652+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 207, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.13", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "True", "picked": null, "sampled": "False. According to Rule 1.2(d) of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer shall not counsel a client to engage, or assist a client, in conduct that the lawyer knows is criminal or fraudulent. However, a lawyer may discuss the legal consequences of any proposed course of conduct with a client and may counsel or assist a client to make a good faith effort to determine the validity, scope, meaning, or application of the law.", "options": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:16:21.862703+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 208, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.98", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "If a client does not respond within 90 days after receiving notice of the proposed sale of their lawyer's practice, their consent to the transfer of their files is presumed."}], "sampled": ["True. According to Rule 1.17(b) of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, if a client does not object to the proposed sale of their lawyer's practice within 90 days after receiving notice, their consent to the transfer of their files is presumed."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:16:22.062339+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 209, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.98", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "True", "picked": "True", "sampled": "True. According to Rule 1.17(b) of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, if a client does not object to the proposed sale of their lawyer's practice within 90 days after receiving notice, their consent to the transfer of their files is presumed.", "options": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:16:22.062388+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 210, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.52", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer may accept payment from a source other than the client if the client is informed and consents, and the arrangement does not compromise the lawyer's duty of loyalty or independent judgment."}], "sampled": ["True. According to Rule 1.8(f) of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer may accept payment from a third party for representing a client if the client gives informed consent, the arrangement does not interfere with the lawyer's professional judgment or obligations to the client, and the lawyer maintains confidentiality with the client."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:16:22.098780+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 211, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.52", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "True", "picked": "True", "sampled": "True. According to Rule 1.8(f) of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer may accept payment from a third party for representing a client if the client gives informed consent, the arrangement does not interfere with the lawyer's professional judgment or obligations to the client, and the lawyer maintains confidentiality with the client.", "options": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:16:22.098846+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 212, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.68", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "In common representation, if one client asks the lawyer not to disclose information relevant to the representation to the other client, the lawyer must withdraw from representing both clients."}], "sampled": ["True. According to Rule 1.7 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer shall not represent a client if the representation involves a concurrent conflict of interest. A concurrent conflict of interest exists if there is a significant risk that the representation of one or more clients will be materially limited by the lawyer's responsibilities to another client. In common representation, if one client asks the lawyer not to disclose information relevant to the representation to the other client, the lawyer's duty of loyalty and confidentiality to both clients would be materially limited, and therefore the lawyer must withdraw from representing both clients."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:16:22.219413+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 213, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.68", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "False", "picked": null, "sampled": "True. According to Rule 1.7 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer shall not represent a client if the representation involves a concurrent conflict of interest. A concurrent conflict of interest exists if there is a significant risk that the representation of one or more clients will be materially limited by the lawyer's responsibilities to another client. In common representation, if one client asks the lawyer not to disclose information relevant to the representation to the other client, the lawyer's duty of loyalty and confidentiality to both clients would be materially limited, and therefore the lawyer must withdraw from representing both clients.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:16:22.219512+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 214, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.6", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "An attorney may consult with lawyers inside of the attorney's firm on the client's case without telling the client."}], "sampled": ["True. According to Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer is generally required to maintain client confidentiality. However, there are exceptions to this rule, including when the lawyer needs to consult with other lawyers in the same firm. In such cases, the lawyer is not required to inform the client about the consultation."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:16:23.770141+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 215, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.6", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "True", "picked": "True", "sampled": "True. According to Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer is generally required to maintain client confidentiality. However, there are exceptions to this rule, including when the lawyer needs to consult with other lawyers in the same firm. In such cases, the lawyer is not required to inform the client about the consultation.", "options": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:16:23.770175+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 216, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.11", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "In a criminal case, the lawyer has the final say in decisions regarding the client's plea, whether to waive jury trial, and whether the client will testify."}], "sampled": ["False. The lawyer's duty is to advise the client on these decisions and provide the client with the information necessary to make an informed decision. Ultimately, the decision is up to the client, and the lawyer must abide by the client's decision, even if the lawyer disagrees with it. This is outlined in Rule 1.2 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:16:23.831229+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 217, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.11", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "False", "picked": "False", "sampled": "False. The lawyer's duty is to advise the client on these decisions and provide the client with the information necessary to make an informed decision. Ultimately, the decision is up to the client, and the lawyer must abide by the client's decision, even if the lawyer disagrees with it. This is outlined in Rule 1.2 of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:16:23.831266+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 218, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.34", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer may disclose information relating to the representation of a client if the disclosure is impliedly authorized to carry out the representation."}], "sampled": ["True. According to Rule 1.6(b)(4) of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer may disclose information relating to the representation of a client if the disclosure is impliedly authorized in order to carry out the representation. However, the lawyer must still make reasonable efforts to ensure that the information disclosed is no more than necessary to achieve the purpose for which the disclosure is made."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:16:24.551495+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502221530JJW7MG7T", "event_id": 219, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.34", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "True", "picked": "True", "sampled": "True. According to Rule 1.6(b)(4) of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer may disclose information relating to the representation of a client if the disclosure is impliedly authorized in order to carry out the representation. However, the lawyer must still make reasonable efforts to ensure that the information disclosed is no more than necessary to achieve the purpose for which the disclosure is made.", "options": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:16:24.551554+00:00"}
diff --git a/evals/aba-mrpc-true-false/aba-4.jsonl b/evals/aba-mrpc-true-false/aba-4.jsonl
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..173e2f542160fd7fee903447b8ccd115d98ffb32
--- /dev/null
+++ b/evals/aba-mrpc-true-false/aba-4.jsonl
@@ -0,0 +1,222 @@
+{"spec": {"completion_fns": ["gpt-4"], "eval_name": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.v0", "base_eval": "aba_mrpc_true_false", "split": "dev", "run_config": {"completion_fns": ["gpt-4"], "eval_spec": {"cls": "evals.elsuite.basic.match:Match", "args": {"samples_jsonl": "aba_mrpc_true_false/samples.jsonl"}, "key": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.v0", "group": "aba-mrpc-true-false"}, "seed": 20220722, "max_samples": null, "command": "/Users/acabrera/dev-research/22-zeno/openai-eval/evals/evals/cli/oaieval.py gpt-4 aba_mrpc_true_false", "initial_settings": {"visible": true}}, "created_by": "", "run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:03:59.769716"}}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 0, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.58", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the information provided about conflict of interest."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A client who has given consent to a conflict cannot revoke the consent or terminate the lawyer's representation if the lawyer reasonably and honestly believes the timing would harm the client's interests."}], "sampled": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:01.042382+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 1, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.58", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "False", "picked": "False", "sampled": "False", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:01.042456+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 2, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.19", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "If a lawyer knows that a client expects assistance not permitted by the Rules of Professional Conduct, the lawyer must immediately withdraw from the representation."}], "sampled": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:01.063273+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 3, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.19", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "False", "picked": null, "sampled": "True", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:01.063319+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 4, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.54", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the information provided about conflict of interest."}, {"role": "user", "content": "In all cases, clients can consent to a representation where a conflict of interest exists."}], "sampled": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:01.110339+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 5, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.54", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "False", "picked": "False", "sampled": "False", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:01.110399+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 6, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.82", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "An attorney must not act with the sole purpose of delaying, burdening, or embarrassing other parties while obtaining evidence."}], "sampled": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:02.738799+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 7, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.82", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "True", "picked": "True", "sampled": "True", "options": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:02.738858+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 8, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.56", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the information provided about conflict of interest."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Informed consent requires the client to be aware of the possible effects on loyalty, confidentiality, and the attorney-client privilege when multiple clients are represented in a single matter."}], "sampled": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:03.817849+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 9, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.56", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "True", "picked": "True", "sampled": "True", "options": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:03.817924+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 10, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.7", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "When lawyers from more than one law firm are providing legal services to a client on a particular matter, they do not need to consult with each other and the client about the scope of their respective representations."}], "sampled": ["False. When lawyers from more than one law firm are providing legal services to a client on a particular matter, they must consult with each other and the client about the scope of their respective representations, according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:08.091630+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 11, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.7", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "False", "picked": "False", "sampled": "False. When lawyers from more than one law firm are providing legal services to a client on a particular matter, they must consult with each other and the client about the scope of their respective representations, according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:08.091682+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 12, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.83", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Lawyers are allowed to make out-of-court statements that are completely true, but that they reasonably should know have a substantial likelihood of materially prejudicing the case."}], "sampled": ["False. According to ABA Model Rule 3.6, lawyers are not allowed to make out-of-court statements that they reasonably should know have a substantial likelihood of materially prejudicing the case, even if the statements are true."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:08.502269+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 13, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.83", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "False", "picked": "False", "sampled": "False. According to ABA Model Rule 3.6, lawyers are not allowed to make out-of-court statements that they reasonably should know have a substantial likelihood of materially prejudicing the case, even if the statements are true.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:08.502306+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 14, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.78", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A prosecutor is obligated to timely disclose favorable evidence to the defense, even if it is inadmissible or has no impact on the outcome of the case."}], "sampled": ["True. According to ABA Model Rule of Professional Conduct 3.8(d), a prosecutor is obligated to timely disclose to the defense any evidence or information known to the prosecutor that tends to negate the guilt of the accused or mitigates the offense, regardless of its admissibility or impact on the outcome of the case."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:10.741844+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 15, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.78", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "True", "picked": "True", "sampled": "True. According to ABA Model Rule of Professional Conduct 3.8(d), a prosecutor is obligated to timely disclose to the defense any evidence or information known to the prosecutor that tends to negate the guilt of the accused or mitigates the offense, regardless of its admissibility or impact on the outcome of the case.", "options": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:10.741902+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 16, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.24", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A contingent fee agreement must be orally agreed upon between the lawyer and client, stating the method by which the fee is to be determined."}], "sampled": ["False. According to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 1.5(c), a contingent fee agreement must be in writing and signed by the client. It should clearly state the method by which the fee is to be determined, including the percentage that will accrue to the lawyer in the event of settlement, trial, or appeal."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:11.020220+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 17, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.24", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "False", "picked": "False", "sampled": "False. According to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 1.5(c), a contingent fee agreement must be in writing and signed by the client. It should clearly state the method by which the fee is to be determined, including the percentage that will accrue to the lawyer in the event of settlement, trial, or appeal.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:11.020258+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 18, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.9", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer cannot ethically represent a client if they disagree with the client's political, economic, social or moral views related to the matter."}], "sampled": ["False. According to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer's representation of a client does not constitute an endorsement of the client's political, economic, social, or moral views or activities. A lawyer can ethically represent a client even if they disagree with the client's views related to the matter."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:11.764122+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 19, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.9", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "False", "picked": "False", "sampled": "False. According to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer's representation of a client does not constitute an endorsement of the client's political, economic, social, or moral views or activities. A lawyer can ethically represent a client even if they disagree with the client's views related to the matter.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:11.764173+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 20, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.50", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer may engage in sexual relationships with a client if the relationship predates the formation of the client-lawyer relationship."}], "sampled": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:11.863735+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 21, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.50", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "True", "picked": "True", "sampled": "True", "options": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:11.863784+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 22, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.22", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer may charge a client an unreasonable fee or an unreasonable amount for expenses, as long as the client agrees to it."}], "sampled": ["False. According to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 1.5(a), a lawyer shall not make an agreement for, charge, or collect an unreasonable fee or an unreasonable amount for expenses. The reasonableness of a fee is determined by various factors, and client agreement alone does not justify an unreasonable fee."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:12.176163+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 23, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.22", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "False", "picked": "False", "sampled": "False. According to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 1.5(a), a lawyer shall not make an agreement for, charge, or collect an unreasonable fee or an unreasonable amount for expenses. The reasonableness of a fee is determined by various factors, and client agreement alone does not justify an unreasonable fee.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:12.176201+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 24, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.72", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer who moves from one firm to another can be screened from participation in a matter, and the new firm can represent a client with adverse interests without obtaining the former client's informed consent."}], "sampled": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:12.485153+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 25, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.72", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "True", "picked": "True", "sampled": "True", "options": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:12.485201+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 26, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.1", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Newly admitted lawyers cannot be as competent as practitioners with long experience."}], "sampled": ["False. According to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 1.1, a lawyer must provide competent representation to a client, which requires the legal knowledge, skill, thoroughness, and preparation reasonably necessary for the representation. Competence can be achieved by newly admitted lawyers as well as experienced practitioners, as long as they meet the requirements of the rule."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:12.753552+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 27, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.1", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "False", "picked": "False", "sampled": "False. According to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 1.1, a lawyer must provide competent representation to a client, which requires the legal knowledge, skill, thoroughness, and preparation reasonably necessary for the representation. Competence can be achieved by newly admitted lawyers as well as experienced practitioners, as long as they meet the requirements of the rule.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:12.753603+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 28, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.15", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer is allowed to draft and deliver documents that they know are fraudulent in order to assist their client."}], "sampled": ["False. According to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 1.2(d), a lawyer is prohibited from assisting a client in conduct that the lawyer knows is criminal or fraudulent. Additionally, Rule 4.1 states that a lawyer must not knowingly make a false statement of material fact or law to a third person while representing a client."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:13.892034+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 29, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.15", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "False", "picked": "False", "sampled": "False. According to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 1.2(d), a lawyer is prohibited from assisting a client in conduct that the lawyer knows is criminal or fraudulent. Additionally, Rule 4.1 states that a lawyer must not knowingly make a false statement of material fact or law to a third person while representing a client.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:13.892089+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 30, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.62", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer is prohibited from representing multiple parties to a negotiation if their interests are fundamentally antagonistic to each other."}], "sampled": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:14.013933+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 31, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.62", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "True", "picked": "True", "sampled": "True", "options": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:14.013966+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 32, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.96", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "During the sale of a law practice, the seller must obtain client consent before sharing detailed information about a client's case with the potential buyer."}], "sampled": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:14.206332+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 33, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.96", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "True", "picked": "True", "sampled": "True", "options": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:14.206413+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 34, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.3", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer must always prepare for legal problems with which they are not familiar by seeking special training."}], "sampled": ["False. According to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer is not required to seek special training for every unfamiliar legal issue. However, they must provide competent representation, which may involve acquiring the necessary learning and skill to handle the matter or associating with a lawyer who is competent in that area."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:14.483666+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 35, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.3", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "False", "picked": "False", "sampled": "False. According to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer is not required to seek special training for every unfamiliar legal issue. However, they must provide competent representation, which may involve acquiring the necessary learning and skill to handle the matter or associating with a lawyer who is competent in that area.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:14.483705+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 36, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.29", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "When determining the reasonableness of a fee, factors such as the time and labor required, the novelty and difficulty of the questions involved, and the skill requisite to perform the legal service properly should be considered."}], "sampled": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:15.527504+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 37, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.29", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "True", "picked": "True", "sampled": "True", "options": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:15.527543+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 38, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.14", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer's representation of a client does not imply endorsement of the client's views or activities."}], "sampled": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:15.670279+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 39, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.14", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "True", "picked": "True", "sampled": "True", "options": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:15.670321+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 40, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.47", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer may represent clients with economically adverse interests in unrelated matters without obtaining their informed consent."}], "sampled": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:15.787155+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 41, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.47", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "True", "picked": "True", "sampled": "True", "options": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:15.787194+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 42, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.28", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer may charge a contingent fee for representing a defendant in a criminal case."}], "sampled": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:16.922104+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 43, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.28", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "False", "picked": "False", "sampled": "False", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:16.922148+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 44, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.92", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "It is permissible for an attorney to talk to members of the jury before or during a trial, so long as the discussion is not about the trial."}], "sampled": ["False. According to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 3.5, a lawyer is prohibited from communicating with jurors before or during a trial, regardless of the topic of conversation."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:18.662020+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 45, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.92", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "False", "picked": "False", "sampled": "False. According to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 3.5, a lawyer is prohibited from communicating with jurors before or during a trial, regardless of the topic of conversation.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:18.662051+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 46, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.35", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer is prohibited from revealing any information relating to the representation of a client, regardless of the circumstances."}], "sampled": ["False. While a lawyer must maintain client confidentiality, there are exceptions under the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct that allow a lawyer to reveal information relating to the representation of a client under certain circumstances, such as to prevent reasonably certain death or substantial bodily harm, or to prevent the client from committing a crime or fraud."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:20.492682+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 47, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.35", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "False", "picked": "False", "sampled": "False. While a lawyer must maintain client confidentiality, there are exceptions under the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct that allow a lawyer to reveal information relating to the representation of a client under certain circumstances, such as to prevent reasonably certain death or substantial bodily harm, or to prevent the client from committing a crime or fraud.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:20.492725+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 48, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.10", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer may limit the scope of representation if it is reasonable and the client gives informed consent."}], "sampled": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:21.802659+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 49, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.10", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "True", "picked": "True", "sampled": "True", "options": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:21.802755+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 50, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.12", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer can counsel a client to engage in conduct that the lawyer knows is criminal or fraudulent."}], "sampled": ["False. According to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 1.2(d), a lawyer is prohibited from counseling a client to engage in conduct that the lawyer knows is criminal or fraudulent."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:23.020662+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 51, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.12", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "False", "picked": "False", "sampled": "False. According to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 1.2(d), a lawyer is prohibited from counseling a client to engage in conduct that the lawyer knows is criminal or fraudulent.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:23.020703+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 52, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.94", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer may sell certain cases of their law practice and retain others, depending on how valuable they are."}], "sampled": ["False. According to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 1.17, a lawyer may sell or purchase a law practice, or an area of law practice, but they cannot sell or retain individual cases based on their value. The sale must include the entire practice or an entire area of practice."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:23.181604+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 53, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.94", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "False", "picked": "False", "sampled": "False. According to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 1.17, a lawyer may sell or purchase a law practice, or an area of law practice, but they cannot sell or retain individual cases based on their value. The sale must include the entire practice or an entire area of practice.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:23.181663+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 54, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.74", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A disqualification prescribed by Rule 1.10 may be waived by the affected client under the conditions stated in Rule 1.7."}], "sampled": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:23.535733+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 55, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.74", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "True", "picked": "True", "sampled": "True", "options": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:23.535793+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 56, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.45", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer may represent a client with a concurrent conflict of interest without obtaining informed consent from each affected client, as long as the lawyer reasonably believes they can provide competent and diligent representation."}], "sampled": ["False. A lawyer may represent a client with a concurrent conflict of interest only if they obtain informed consent from each affected client, and the lawyer reasonably believes they can provide competent and diligent representation."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:23.537279+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 57, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.45", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "False", "picked": "False", "sampled": "False. A lawyer may represent a client with a concurrent conflict of interest only if they obtain informed consent from each affected client, and the lawyer reasonably believes they can provide competent and diligent representation.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:23.537318+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 58, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.44", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer is permitted to disclose client information if a court or other tribunal orders the disclosure, even without the client's informed consent."}], "sampled": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:24.219359+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 59, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.44", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "True", "picked": "True", "sampled": "True", "options": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:24.219405+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 60, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.75", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer's disqualification based on prior work as a law student will result in the disqualification of all other lawyers in the firm."}], "sampled": ["False. According to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer's disqualification based on prior work as a law student does not automatically result in the disqualification of all other lawyers in the firm. However, the firm must take appropriate measures to ensure that the disqualified lawyer is screened from any participation in the matter and does not share in the fees generated by the matter."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:24.746884+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 61, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.75", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "False", "picked": "False", "sampled": "False. According to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer's disqualification based on prior work as a law student does not automatically result in the disqualification of all other lawyers in the firm. However, the firm must take appropriate measures to ensure that the disqualified lawyer is screened from any participation in the matter and does not share in the fees generated by the matter.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:24.746944+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 62, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.67", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer who is a member of a corporation's board of directors must resign from the board or cease acting as the corporation's lawyer when a conflict of interest arises."}], "sampled": ["False. According to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer who is a member of a corporation's board of directors is not automatically required to resign from the board or cease acting as the corporation's lawyer when a conflict of interest arises. However, the lawyer must address the conflict in accordance with Rule 1.7, which governs conflicts of interest involving current clients. The lawyer may need to obtain informed consent from the affected clients, implement appropriate screening measures, or take other steps to resolve the conflict. In some cases, resignation from the board or ceasing to act as the corporation's lawyer may be necessary if the conflict cannot be resolved in a manner consistent with the lawyer's professional obligations."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:25.028471+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 63, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.67", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "False", "picked": "False", "sampled": "False. According to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer who is a member of a corporation's board of directors is not automatically required to resign from the board or cease acting as the corporation's lawyer when a conflict of interest arises. However, the lawyer must address the conflict in accordance with Rule 1.7, which governs conflicts of interest involving current clients. The lawyer may need to obtain informed consent from the affected clients, implement appropriate screening measures, or take other steps to resolve the conflict. In some cases, resignation from the board or ceasing to act as the corporation's lawyer may be necessary if the conflict cannot be resolved in a manner consistent with the lawyer's professional obligations.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:25.028523+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 64, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.30", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer is allowed to reveal information relating to the representation of a client if they believe it is necessary to prevent the client from committing a crime.."}], "sampled": ["True. According to ABA Model Rule 1.6(b)(1), a lawyer may reveal information relating to the representation of a client to the extent the lawyer reasonably believes necessary to prevent reasonably certain death or substantial bodily harm, or to prevent the client from committing a crime or fraud that is reasonably certain to result in substantial injury to the financial interests or property of another and in furtherance of which the client has used or is using the lawyer's services."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:25.045156+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 65, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.30", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "False", "picked": null, "sampled": "True. According to ABA Model Rule 1.6(b)(1), a lawyer may reveal information relating to the representation of a client to the extent the lawyer reasonably believes necessary to prevent reasonably certain death or substantial bodily harm, or to prevent the client from committing a crime or fraud that is reasonably certain to result in substantial injury to the financial interests or property of another and in furtherance of which the client has used or is using the lawyer's services.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:25.045204+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 66, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.63", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer can represent multiple clients with generally aligned interests even if there are some differences in interest among them."}], "sampled": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:25.631950+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 67, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.63", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "True", "picked": "True", "sampled": "True", "options": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:25.632038+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 68, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.79", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "It is acceptable for an attorney to communicate directly with a person who is represented by counsel on a specific matter without the consent of their counsel."}], "sampled": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:25.698504+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 69, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.79", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "False", "picked": "False", "sampled": "False", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:25.698549+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 70, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.66", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer representing an organization also represents all of its affiliated organizations, such as parent and subsidiary companies."}], "sampled": ["False. According to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer representing an organization does not automatically represent its affiliated organizations, such as parent and subsidiary companies. Each organization is considered a separate legal entity, and representation must be established separately."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:26.038715+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 71, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.66", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "False", "picked": "False", "sampled": "False. According to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer representing an organization does not automatically represent its affiliated organizations, such as parent and subsidiary companies. Each organization is considered a separate legal entity, and representation must be established separately.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:26.038757+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 72, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.53", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A parent who pays for the lawyer's services on behalf of a child may direct or control some of the legal strategy decisions made."}], "sampled": ["False. According to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 1.8(f) and Rule 5.4(c), a lawyer must maintain independence and not allow a third party who pays for the legal services to interfere with the lawyer's professional judgment or the client-lawyer relationship. The lawyer must always act in the best interest of the client, even if the client is a child and the parent is paying for the legal services."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:26.575881+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 73, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.53", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "False", "picked": "False", "sampled": "False. According to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 1.8(f) and Rule 5.4(c), a lawyer must maintain independence and not allow a third party who pays for the legal services to interfere with the lawyer's professional judgment or the client-lawyer relationship. The lawyer must always act in the best interest of the client, even if the client is a child and the parent is paying for the legal services.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:26.575924+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 74, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.59", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the information provided about conflict of interest."}, {"role": "user", "content": "General and open-ended advance consent to future conflicts is considered effective."}], "sampled": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:26.936049+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 75, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.59", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "False", "picked": "False", "sampled": "False", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:26.936133+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 76, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.91", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Attorneys must not engage in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation, even in their private business or personal life that is unrelated to the practice of law."}], "sampled": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:27.585692+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 77, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.91", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "True", "picked": "True", "sampled": "True", "options": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:27.585728+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 78, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.100", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer who sells an area of their practice must cease accepting any matters in that area, including as counsel or co-counsel, after the sale."}], "sampled": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:28.323817+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 79, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.100", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "True", "picked": "True", "sampled": "True", "options": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:28.323877+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 80, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.84", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "It is acceptable for a prosecutor to make true comments that have a substantial likelihood of heightening public condemnation of the accused."}], "sampled": ["False. According to ABA Model Rule 3.8(f), a prosecutor should not make extrajudicial comments that have a substantial likelihood of heightening public condemnation of the accused."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:29.380666+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 81, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.84", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "False", "picked": "False", "sampled": "False. According to ABA Model Rule 3.8(f), a prosecutor should not make extrajudicial comments that have a substantial likelihood of heightening public condemnation of the accused.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:29.380737+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 82, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.65", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "As between commonly represented clients, the attorney-client privilege does not attach."}], "sampled": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:29.623569+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 83, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.65", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "True", "picked": "True", "sampled": "True", "options": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:29.623607+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 84, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.77", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "In ex parte proceedings, an attorney is not required to reveal information that may be harmful to their client's case."}], "sampled": ["False. According to ABA Model Rule 3.3(d), in an ex parte proceeding, a lawyer shall inform the tribunal of all material facts known to the lawyer that will enable the tribunal to make an informed decision, whether or not the facts are adverse to the client's position."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:32.350179+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 85, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.77", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "False", "picked": "False", "sampled": "False. According to ABA Model Rule 3.3(d), in an ex parte proceeding, a lawyer shall inform the tribunal of all material facts known to the lawyer that will enable the tribunal to make an informed decision, whether or not the facts are adverse to the client's position.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:32.350295+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 86, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.21", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer must communicate the scope of representation and the basis or rate of the fee and expenses to the client in writing before the representation commences in all cases."}], "sampled": ["False. According to ABA Model Rule 1.5(b), a lawyer must communicate the scope of representation and the basis or rate of the fee and expenses to the client, preferably in writing, before or within a reasonable time after commencing the representation, except when the lawyer will charge a regularly represented client on the same basis or rate. In some situations, it may not be required to be in writing."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:32.624821+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 87, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.21", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "False", "picked": "False", "sampled": "False. According to ABA Model Rule 1.5(b), a lawyer must communicate the scope of representation and the basis or rate of the fee and expenses to the client, preferably in writing, before or within a reasonable time after commencing the representation, except when the lawyer will charge a regularly represented client on the same basis or rate. In some situations, it may not be required to be in writing.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:32.624862+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 88, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.41", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer is not required to take any special security measures when transmitting client information if the method of communication affords a reasonable expectation of privacy."}], "sampled": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:33.744428+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 89, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.41", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "True", "picked": "True", "sampled": "True", "options": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:33.744469+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 90, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.64", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer must always maintain impartiality between commonly represented clients."}], "sampled": ["True. According to ABA Model Rule 1.7, a lawyer must maintain impartiality when representing clients with common interests to avoid conflicts of interest."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:33.840637+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 91, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.64", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "True", "picked": "True", "sampled": "True. According to ABA Model Rule 1.7, a lawyer must maintain impartiality when representing clients with common interests to avoid conflicts of interest.", "options": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:33.840685+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 92, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.27", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer is required to return any unearned portion of a fee if the client fires them without warning."}], "sampled": ["True. According to ABA Model Rule 1.16(d), when a lawyer's representation is terminated, the lawyer must return any unearned portion of a fee to the client."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:36.036588+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 93, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.27", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "True", "picked": "True", "sampled": "True. According to ABA Model Rule 1.16(d), when a lawyer's representation is terminated, the lawyer must return any unearned portion of a fee to the client.", "options": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:36.036635+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 94, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.90", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "An attorney has no duty to follow valid procedural rules and court orders that they reasonably believe are defective or invalid."}], "sampled": ["False. According to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, an attorney has a duty to follow valid procedural rules and court orders, even if they reasonably believe they are defective or invalid. They may challenge or seek to modify such rules or orders, but they must still comply with them until they are changed or overturned."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:36.752880+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 95, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.90", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "False", "picked": "False", "sampled": "False. According to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, an attorney has a duty to follow valid procedural rules and court orders, even if they reasonably believe they are defective or invalid. They may challenge or seek to modify such rules or orders, but they must still comply with them until they are changed or overturned.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:36.752910+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 96, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.46", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer is allowed to represent a client if the representation involves asserting a claim by one client against another client represented by the same lawyer in the same litigation."}], "sampled": ["False. According to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 1.7, a lawyer cannot represent a client if there is a concurrent conflict of interest. A concurrent conflict of interest exists if the representation of one client will be directly adverse to another client. Representing clients with opposing claims in the same litigation would create a conflict of interest for the lawyer."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:37.163481+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 97, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.46", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "False", "picked": "False", "sampled": "False. According to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 1.7, a lawyer cannot represent a client if there is a concurrent conflict of interest. A concurrent conflict of interest exists if the representation of one client will be directly adverse to another client. Representing clients with opposing claims in the same litigation would create a conflict of interest for the lawyer.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:37.163534+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 98, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.88", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "An attorney must report any attorney or judge's violation of the Rules if it raises a substantial question as to their honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer."}], "sampled": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:37.372465+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 99, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.88", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "True", "picked": "True", "sampled": "True", "options": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:37.372513+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 100, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.36", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer may disclose information relating to the representation of a client to secure legal advice about the lawyer's compliance with the Rules of Professional Conduct."}], "sampled": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:38.799378+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 101, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.36", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "True", "picked": "True", "sampled": "True", "options": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:38.799460+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 102, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.69", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer representing multiple clients in the same matter should consider the potential additional cost, embarrassment, and recrimination if the common representation fails."}], "sampled": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:38.851356+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 103, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.69", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "True", "picked": "True", "sampled": "True", "options": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:38.851393+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 104, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.80", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A prosecutor has a duty to protect the accused's right to counsel."}], "sampled": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:39.990683+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 105, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.80", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "True", "picked": "True", "sampled": "True", "options": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:39.990737+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 106, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.81", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer can make false statements of fact to adversaries and third parties."}], "sampled": ["False. According to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 4.1, a lawyer is prohibited from knowingly making false statements of fact or law to adversaries and third parties."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:40.122442+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 107, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.81", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "False", "picked": "False", "sampled": "False. According to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 4.1, a lawyer is prohibited from knowingly making false statements of fact or law to adversaries and third parties.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:40.122503+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 108, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.23", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer is permitted to enter into a fee arrangement that might induce the lawyer to curtail services for the client or perform them in a way contrary to the client's interest."}], "sampled": ["False. According to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer is not permitted to enter into a fee arrangement that might induce the lawyer to curtail services for the client or perform them in a way contrary to the client's interest. Rule 1.5(a) states that a lawyer shall not make an agreement for, charge, or collect an unreasonable fee or an unreasonable amount for expenses."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:40.208193+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 109, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.23", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "False", "picked": "False", "sampled": "False. According to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer is not permitted to enter into a fee arrangement that might induce the lawyer to curtail services for the client or perform them in a way contrary to the client's interest. Rule 1.5(a) states that a lawyer shall not make an agreement for, charge, or collect an unreasonable fee or an unreasonable amount for expenses.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:40.208244+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 110, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.73", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A law firm is prohibited from representing a client with interests adverse to those of a client represented by a formerly associated lawyer."}], "sampled": ["False. A law firm is not automatically prohibited from representing a client with interests adverse to those of a client represented by a formerly associated lawyer. However, the firm may be prohibited if the matter is the same or substantially related to the matter the formerly associated lawyer worked on, and the lawyer has confidential information that could be used to the disadvantage of the former client. In such cases, the firm may still represent the new client if the former client gives informed consent, confirmed in writing."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:40.465400+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 111, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.73", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "False", "picked": "False", "sampled": "False. A law firm is not automatically prohibited from representing a client with interests adverse to those of a client represented by a formerly associated lawyer. However, the firm may be prohibited if the matter is the same or substantially related to the matter the formerly associated lawyer worked on, and the lawyer has confidential information that could be used to the disadvantage of the former client. In such cases, the firm may still represent the new client if the former client gives informed consent, confirmed in writing.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:40.465448+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 112, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.70", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "When seeking to establish or adjust a relationship between clients, the lawyer's role is that of partisanship normally expected in other circumstances."}], "sampled": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:41.151136+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 113, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.70", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "False", "picked": "False", "sampled": "False", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:41.151185+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 114, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.105", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer should aspire to render at least 50 hours of pro bono legal services each year."}], "sampled": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:41.771349+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 115, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.105", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "True", "picked": "True", "sampled": "True", "options": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:41.771406+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 116, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.93", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "An attorney may be disciplined for failing to prevent ethical violations of other members of their law firm."}], "sampled": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:41.790748+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 117, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.93", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "False", "picked": null, "sampled": "True", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:41.790819+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 118, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.39", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer is allowed to disclose information relating to a client's representation to detect and resolve conflicts of interest without the client's consent."}], "sampled": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:42.541321+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 119, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.39", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "True", "picked": "True", "sampled": "True", "options": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:42.541416+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 120, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.60", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the information provided about conflict of interest."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer may not take inconsistent legal positions in different tribunals at different times on behalf of different clients."}], "sampled": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:42.769874+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 121, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.60", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "False", "picked": null, "sampled": "True", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:42.769915+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 122, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.104", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer should aspire to render at least 25 hours of pro bono legal services each year."}], "sampled": ["True. According to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 6.1, a lawyer should aspire to render at least 50 hours of pro bono legal services per year, with a substantial majority of those hours (at least 25) being provided without fee or expectation of fee to persons of limited means or charitable, religious, civic, community, governmental, and educational organizations in matters that are designed primarily to address the needs of persons of limited means."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:43.854860+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 123, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.104", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "False", "picked": null, "sampled": "True. According to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 6.1, a lawyer should aspire to render at least 50 hours of pro bono legal services per year, with a substantial majority of those hours (at least 25) being provided without fee or expectation of fee to persons of limited means or charitable, religious, civic, community, governmental, and educational organizations in matters that are designed primarily to address the needs of persons of limited means.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:43.854937+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 124, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.61", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the information provided about conflict of interest."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer is required to obtain informed consent from a client, confirmed in writing, when there is a potential conflict of interest."}], "sampled": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:43.986251+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 125, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.61", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "False", "picked": null, "sampled": "True", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:43.986336+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 126, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.33", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer may reveal information relating to the representation of a client to detect and resolve conflicts of interest arising from changes in the composition or ownership of a firm, even if the revealed information would compromise the attorney-client privilege."}], "sampled": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:43.993390+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 127, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.33", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "False", "picked": null, "sampled": "True", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:43.993444+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 128, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.37", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer is allowed to reveal information relating to the representation of a client to establish a defense in a controversy between the lawyer and the client."}], "sampled": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:45.525342+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 129, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.37", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "True", "picked": "True", "sampled": "True", "options": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:45.525417+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 130, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.86", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Attorneys have an affirmative duty to expedite cases and should not delay cases for their own personal gain or convenience."}], "sampled": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:45.784536+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 131, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.86", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "True", "picked": "True", "sampled": "True", "options": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:45.784643+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 132, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.2", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "In an emergency, a lawyer is allowed to provide assistance in a matter even if they do not have the ordinarily required skill."}], "sampled": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:46.051802+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 133, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.2", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "True", "picked": "True", "sampled": "True", "options": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:46.051950+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 134, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.32", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer is required to reveal information relating to the representation of a client if it is necessary to prevent the client from committing a crime that may result in financial injury to another person."}], "sampled": ["False. According to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 1.6(b), a lawyer may reveal information relating to the representation of a client to the extent the lawyer reasonably believes necessary to prevent the client from committing a crime or fraud that is reasonably certain to result in substantial injury to the financial interests or property of another and in furtherance of which the client has used or is using the lawyer's services. It is not a requirement, but rather a discretionary decision for the lawyer."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:46.210659+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 135, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.32", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "False", "picked": "False", "sampled": "False. According to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 1.6(b), a lawyer may reveal information relating to the representation of a client to the extent the lawyer reasonably believes necessary to prevent the client from committing a crime or fraud that is reasonably certain to result in substantial injury to the financial interests or property of another and in furtherance of which the client has used or is using the lawyer's services. It is not a requirement, but rather a discretionary decision for the lawyer.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:46.210708+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 136, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.18", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer is prohibited from discussing the legal consequences of a proposed course of conduct with a client if that conduct is clearly criminal."}], "sampled": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:46.769725+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 137, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.18", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "False", "picked": "False", "sampled": "False", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:46.769766+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 138, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.5", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "An attorney may consult with lawyers outside of the attorney's firm on the client's case without telling the client."}], "sampled": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:46.961747+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 139, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.5", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "False", "picked": null, "sampled": "True", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:46.961786+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 140, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.51", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer who is closely related by blood or marriage to another lawyer may represent a client in a matter where the other lawyer represents another party, without obtaining informed consent from each client."}], "sampled": ["False. According to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 1.7, a lawyer who is closely related by blood or marriage to another lawyer may represent a client in a matter where the other lawyer represents another party only if the lawyer reasonably believes that they will be able to provide competent and diligent representation to each affected client and each client gives informed consent, confirmed in writing."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:48.138639+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 141, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.51", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "False", "picked": "False", "sampled": "False. According to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 1.7, a lawyer who is closely related by blood or marriage to another lawyer may represent a client in a matter where the other lawyer represents another party only if the lawyer reasonably believes that they will be able to provide competent and diligent representation to each affected client and each client gives informed consent, confirmed in writing.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:48.138712+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 142, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.57", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the information provided about conflict of interest."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A client who has given consent to a conflict cannot revoke the consent or terminate the lawyer's representation at any time."}], "sampled": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:48.831392+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 143, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.57", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "False", "picked": "False", "sampled": "False", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:48.831434+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 144, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.40", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer must take reasonable efforts to prevent unauthorized access to or disclosure of client information, even if the lawyer is not at fault for the unauthorized access or disclosure."}], "sampled": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:49.152058+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 145, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.40", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "True", "picked": "True", "sampled": "True", "options": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:49.152098+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 146, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.102", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer is required to render pro bono legal services each year."}], "sampled": ["False. According to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 6.1, a lawyer should aspire to render at least 50 hours of pro bono legal services per year, but it is not a strict requirement."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:50.700997+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 147, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.102", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "False", "picked": "False", "sampled": "False. According to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 6.1, a lawyer should aspire to render at least 50 hours of pro bono legal services per year, but it is not a strict requirement.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:50.701037+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 148, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.38", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer must disclose unprotected information relating to the representation of a client, even if the disclosure could reasonably lead to the discovery of protected information by a third party."}], "sampled": ["False. According to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer must not disclose information relating to the representation of a client unless the client gives informed consent, the disclosure is impliedly authorized, or the disclosure is permitted by the rules. A lawyer must take reasonable precautions to prevent the inadvertent or unauthorized disclosure of, or unauthorized access to, information relating to the representation of a client."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:51.285841+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 149, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.38", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "False", "picked": "False", "sampled": "False. According to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer must not disclose information relating to the representation of a client unless the client gives informed consent, the disclosure is impliedly authorized, or the disclosure is permitted by the rules. A lawyer must take reasonable precautions to prevent the inadvertent or unauthorized disclosure of, or unauthorized access to, information relating to the representation of a client.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:51.285892+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 150, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.25", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer may accept property in payment for services, such as an ownership interest in an enterprise, without any limitations or restrictions."}], "sampled": ["False. According to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 1.8(a), a lawyer may accept property in payment for services, but there are limitations and restrictions. The terms of the transaction must be fair and reasonable to the client, fully disclosed and transmitted in writing, and the client must be advised in writing of the desirability of seeking independent legal counsel. The client must also give informed consent, in a writing signed by the client."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:51.489679+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 151, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.25", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "False", "picked": "False", "sampled": "False. According to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 1.8(a), a lawyer may accept property in payment for services, but there are limitations and restrictions. The terms of the transaction must be fair and reasonable to the client, fully disclosed and transmitted in writing, and the client must be advised in writing of the desirability of seeking independent legal counsel. The client must also give informed consent, in a writing signed by the client.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:51.489719+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 152, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.26", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer may divide a fee with another lawyer who is not in the same firm, even if the client does not agree to the arrangement."}], "sampled": ["False. According to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 1.5(e), a lawyer may divide a fee with another lawyer who is not in the same firm only if the client agrees to the arrangement in writing, the division is in proportion to the services performed by each lawyer, or both lawyers assume joint responsibility for the representation."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:53.072157+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 153, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.26", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "False", "picked": "False", "sampled": "False. According to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 1.5(e), a lawyer may divide a fee with another lawyer who is not in the same firm only if the client agrees to the arrangement in writing, the division is in proportion to the services performed by each lawyer, or both lawyers assume joint responsibility for the representation.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:53.072219+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 154, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.8", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Maintaining competence does not require a lawyer to keep abreast of changes in the law and its practice."}], "sampled": ["False. Maintaining competence requires a lawyer to keep abreast of changes in the law and its practice."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:53.445045+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 155, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.8", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "False", "picked": "False", "sampled": "False. Maintaining competence requires a lawyer to keep abreast of changes in the law and its practice.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:53.445128+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 156, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.55", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the information provided about conflict of interest."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Representation is prohibited if the lawyer cannot reasonably conclude that they will be able to provide competent and diligent representation."}], "sampled": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:54.389001+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 157, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.55", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "True", "picked": "True", "sampled": "True", "options": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:54.389048+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 158, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.95", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer who sells their entire practice may subsequently work as in-house counsel for a business."}], "sampled": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:55.794012+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 159, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.95", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "True", "picked": "True", "sampled": "True", "options": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:55.794059+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 160, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.85", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer must self-report when they know they have violated the rules of professional conduct."}], "sampled": ["True. According to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 8.3(a), a lawyer who knows that another lawyer has committed a violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct that raises a substantial question as to that lawyer's honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer in other respects, must inform the appropriate professional authority. This obligation applies to self-reporting as well."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:58.872708+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 161, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.85", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "False", "picked": null, "sampled": "True. According to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 8.3(a), a lawyer who knows that another lawyer has committed a violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct that raises a substantial question as to that lawyer's honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer in other respects, must inform the appropriate professional authority. This obligation applies to self-reporting as well.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:58.872817+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 162, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.103", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer should aspire to render at least 10 hours of pro bono legal services each year."}], "sampled": ["True. According to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 6.1, a lawyer should aspire to render at least 50 hours of pro bono publico legal services per year, with a substantial portion of those hours dedicated to providing legal services to persons of limited means or to organizations that primarily address the needs of persons with limited means."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:59.290550+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 163, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.103", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "False", "picked": null, "sampled": "True. According to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 6.1, a lawyer should aspire to render at least 50 hours of pro bono publico legal services per year, with a substantial portion of those hours dedicated to providing legal services to persons of limited means or to organizations that primarily address the needs of persons with limited means.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:59.290609+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 164, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.89", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A subordinate lawyer who follows an order to take an action in violation of the Rules is not subject to discipline if the ethical responsibility is debatable."}], "sampled": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:59.597733+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 165, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.89", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "True", "picked": "True", "sampled": "True", "options": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:04:59.597816+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 166, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.16", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "When a lawyer discovers that their client's ongoing conduct is criminal or fraudulent, the lawyer must report the client to the authorities."}], "sampled": ["False. According to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer is not required to report their client's ongoing criminal or fraudulent conduct to the authorities. However, the lawyer is required to maintain client confidentiality and may not assist the client in carrying out the criminal or fraudulent conduct. In some circumstances, the lawyer may be permitted or required to disclose information to prevent the client from committing a crime or fraud that is likely to result in substantial injury to the financial interests or property of another."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:05:00.710619+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 167, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.16", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "False", "picked": "False", "sampled": "False. According to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer is not required to report their client's ongoing criminal or fraudulent conduct to the authorities. However, the lawyer is required to maintain client confidentiality and may not assist the client in carrying out the criminal or fraudulent conduct. In some circumstances, the lawyer may be permitted or required to disclose information to prevent the client from committing a crime or fraud that is likely to result in substantial injury to the financial interests or property of another.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:05:00.710659+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 168, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.99", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "It is a violation of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct for a lawyer to sell only a specific area of their law practice."}], "sampled": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:05:00.747110+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 169, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.99", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "False", "picked": "False", "sampled": "False", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:05:00.747151+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 170, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.101", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer selling their practice is allowed to share client confidences with the potential buyer without client consent during preliminary negotiations."}], "sampled": ["False. According to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 1.6, a lawyer must maintain client confidentiality and cannot share client confidences without the client's informed consent, even during preliminary negotiations for the sale of their practice."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:05:01.186091+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 171, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.101", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "True", "picked": null, "sampled": "False. According to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 1.6, a lawyer must maintain client confidentiality and cannot share client confidences without the client's informed consent, even during preliminary negotiations for the sale of their practice.", "options": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:05:01.186125+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 172, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.87", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A licensed attorney may practice law in a jurisdiction where they are not licensed in an emergency situation if it can avoid a substantial injustice."}], "sampled": ["True. According to ABA Model Rule of Professional Conduct 5.5(c)(3), a lawyer may provide legal services on a temporary basis in a jurisdiction where they are not licensed if the lawyer's services are reasonably related to a pending or potential proceeding before a tribunal and the services are necessary to avoid a substantial injustice."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:05:01.262138+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 173, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.87", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "False", "picked": null, "sampled": "True. According to ABA Model Rule of Professional Conduct 5.5(c)(3), a lawyer may provide legal services on a temporary basis in a jurisdiction where they are not licensed if the lawyer's services are reasonably related to a pending or potential proceeding before a tribunal and the services are necessary to avoid a substantial injustice.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:05:01.262188+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 174, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.97", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "If a client does not respond within 60 days after receiving notice of the proposed sale of their lawyer's practice, their consent to the transfer of their files is presumed."}], "sampled": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:05:01.334292+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 175, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.97", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "False", "picked": null, "sampled": "True", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:05:01.334322+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 176, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.17", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer may provide limited representation to a client as long as the limitation is reasonable and the client is properly informed."}], "sampled": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:05:02.455209+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 177, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.17", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "True", "picked": "True", "sampled": "True", "options": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:05:02.455244+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 178, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.76", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "An attorney is allowed to touch and move contraband on behalf of the client."}], "sampled": ["False. According to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, an attorney is not allowed to engage in illegal or dishonest conduct, including handling contraband on behalf of a client. Rule 1.2(d) states that a lawyer shall not counsel a client to engage, or assist a client, in conduct that the lawyer knows is criminal or fraudulent."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:05:03.070791+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 179, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.76", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "False", "picked": "False", "sampled": "False. According to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, an attorney is not allowed to engage in illegal or dishonest conduct, including handling contraband on behalf of a client. Rule 1.2(d) states that a lawyer shall not counsel a client to engage, or assist a client, in conduct that the lawyer knows is criminal or fraudulent.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:05:03.070846+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 180, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.71", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "In a law firm, a lawyer's disqualification due to a personal interest will result in the disqualification of all other lawyers in the firm."}], "sampled": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:05:04.253499+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 181, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.71", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "False", "picked": "False", "sampled": "False", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:05:04.253549+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 182, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.107", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer shall not represent anyone in connection with a matter in which the lawyer participated personally and substantially as a judge or other adjudicative officer or law clerk to such a person or as an arbitrator, mediator or other third-party neutral, unless 3 years have passed after the laywer's last point of involvement."}], "sampled": ["False. According to ABA Model Rule 1.12(a), a lawyer shall not represent anyone in connection with a matter in which the lawyer participated personally and substantially as a judge or other adjudicative officer, arbitrator, mediator, or other third-party neutral, unless all parties to the proceeding give informed consent, confirmed in writing. The rule does not impose a specific time limit, such as 3 years, after the lawyer's last point of involvement."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:05:05.377017+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 183, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.107", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "False", "picked": "False", "sampled": "False. According to ABA Model Rule 1.12(a), a lawyer shall not represent anyone in connection with a matter in which the lawyer participated personally and substantially as a judge or other adjudicative officer, arbitrator, mediator, or other third-party neutral, unless all parties to the proceeding give informed consent, confirmed in writing. The rule does not impose a specific time limit, such as 3 years, after the lawyer's last point of involvement.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:05:05.377094+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 184, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.0", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer with general experience not considered competent to handle a case involving a specialized field of law."}], "sampled": ["False. According to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer can become competent to handle a case involving a specialized field of law through adequate preparation, research, and study. Rule 1.1 states that a lawyer should provide competent representation to a client, which requires the legal knowledge, skill, thoroughness, and preparation reasonably necessary for the representation."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:05:06.038968+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 185, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.0", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "False", "picked": "False", "sampled": "False. According to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer can become competent to handle a case involving a specialized field of law through adequate preparation, research, and study. Rule 1.1 states that a lawyer should provide competent representation to a client, which requires the legal knowledge, skill, thoroughness, and preparation reasonably necessary for the representation.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:05:06.039028+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 186, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.48", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer's duty of loyalty and independent judgment can be materially limited by responsibilities to a former client."}], "sampled": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:05:06.867800+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 187, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.48", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "True", "picked": "True", "sampled": "True", "options": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:05:06.867847+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 188, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.13", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer can counsel a client regarding the consequences of conduct that the lawyer knows is criminal or fraudulent."}], "sampled": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:05:08.418069+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 189, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.13", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "True", "picked": "True", "sampled": "True", "options": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:05:08.418119+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 190, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.31", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer is allowed to reveal information relating to the representation of a client if they believe it is necessary to prevent the client from committing a crime that may result in financial injury to another person."}], "sampled": ["True. According to ABA Model Rule 1.6(b)(2), a lawyer may reveal information relating to the representation of a client to the extent the lawyer reasonably believes necessary to prevent the client from committing a crime or fraud that is reasonably certain to result in substantial injury to the financial interests or property of another and in furtherance of which the client has used or is using the lawyer's services."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:05:09.457630+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 191, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.31", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "True", "picked": "True", "sampled": "True. According to ABA Model Rule 1.6(b)(2), a lawyer may reveal information relating to the representation of a client to the extent the lawyer reasonably believes necessary to prevent the client from committing a crime or fraud that is reasonably certain to result in substantial injury to the financial interests or property of another and in furtherance of which the client has used or is using the lawyer's services.", "options": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:05:09.457681+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 192, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.52", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer may accept payment from a source other than the client if the client is informed and consents, and the arrangement does not compromise the lawyer's duty of loyalty or independent judgment."}], "sampled": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:05:10.592222+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 193, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.52", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "True", "picked": "True", "sampled": "True", "options": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:05:10.592267+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 194, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.43", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer must always appeal an adverse ruling regarding disclosure of client information, regardless of the client's wishes."}], "sampled": ["False. A lawyer is not required to always appeal an adverse ruling regarding disclosure of client information, regardless of the client's wishes. The lawyer should consult with the client and follow the client's instructions, as long as they are consistent with the law and the lawyer's professional obligations."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:05:11.595449+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 195, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.43", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "False", "picked": "False", "sampled": "False. A lawyer is not required to always appeal an adverse ruling regarding disclosure of client information, regardless of the client's wishes. The lawyer should consult with the client and follow the client's instructions, as long as they are consistent with the law and the lawyer's professional obligations.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:05:11.595494+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 196, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.20", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer is permitted to charge a contingent fee in a domestic relations matter, where the payment is contingent upon the securing of a divorce or the amount of alimony or support, when the client is unable to pay otherwise."}], "sampled": ["False. According to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 1.5(d)(1), a lawyer is not permitted to charge a contingent fee in a domestic relations matter where the payment is contingent upon the securing of a divorce or the amount of alimony or support."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:05:11.977219+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 197, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.20", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "False", "picked": "False", "sampled": "False. According to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 1.5(d)(1), a lawyer is not permitted to charge a contingent fee in a domestic relations matter where the payment is contingent upon the securing of a divorce or the amount of alimony or support.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:05:11.977262+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 198, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.34", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer may disclose information relating to the representation of a client if the disclosure is impliedly authorized to carry out the representation."}], "sampled": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:05:13.197056+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 199, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.34", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "True", "picked": "True", "sampled": "True", "options": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:05:13.197121+00:00"}
+{"final_report": {"accuracy": 0.8454545454545455}}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 200, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.106", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer should aspire to render at least 100 hours of pro bono legal services each year."}], "sampled": ["True. According to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 6.1, a lawyer should aspire to render at least 50 hours of pro bono publico legal services per year, with an additional aspiration to provide financial support to organizations that provide legal services to persons of limited means. However, the 100-hour aspiration is a common benchmark that many lawyers and law firms strive to achieve."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:05:14.089475+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 201, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.106", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "False", "picked": null, "sampled": "True. According to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 6.1, a lawyer should aspire to render at least 50 hours of pro bono publico legal services per year, with an additional aspiration to provide financial support to organizations that provide legal services to persons of limited means. However, the 100-hour aspiration is a common benchmark that many lawyers and law firms strive to achieve.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:05:14.089515+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 202, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.6", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "An attorney may consult with lawyers inside of the attorney's firm on the client's case without telling the client."}], "sampled": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:05:14.221922+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 203, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.6", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "True", "picked": "True", "sampled": "True", "options": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:05:14.221963+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 204, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.109", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer shall not represent anyone in connection with a matter in which the lawyer participated personally and substantially as a judge or other adjudicative officer or law clerk to such a person or as an arbitrator, mediator or other third-party neutral, unless 10 years have passed after the laywer's last point of involvement."}], "sampled": ["False. According to ABA Model Rule of Professional Conduct 1.12(a), a lawyer shall not represent anyone in connection with a matter in which the lawyer participated personally and substantially as a judge or other adjudicative officer, arbitrator, mediator, or other third-party neutral, unless all parties to the proceeding give informed consent, confirmed in writing. The rule does not specify a 10-year waiting period."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:05:15.562807+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 205, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.109", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "False", "picked": "False", "sampled": "False. According to ABA Model Rule of Professional Conduct 1.12(a), a lawyer shall not represent anyone in connection with a matter in which the lawyer participated personally and substantially as a judge or other adjudicative officer, arbitrator, mediator, or other third-party neutral, unless all parties to the proceeding give informed consent, confirmed in writing. The rule does not specify a 10-year waiting period.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:05:15.562886+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 206, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.42", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "The duty of confidentiality ends when the client-lawyer relationship is terminated."}], "sampled": ["False. The duty of confidentiality continues even after the client-lawyer relationship has terminated. According to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 1.6, a lawyer must not reveal information relating to the representation of a client unless the client gives informed consent or the disclosure is permitted or required by the rules. This duty extends beyond the termination of the client-lawyer relationship."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:05:15.578088+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 207, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.42", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "False", "picked": "False", "sampled": "False. The duty of confidentiality continues even after the client-lawyer relationship has terminated. According to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 1.6, a lawyer must not reveal information relating to the representation of a client unless the client gives informed consent or the disclosure is permitted or required by the rules. This duty extends beyond the termination of the client-lawyer relationship.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:05:15.578136+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 208, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.68", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "In common representation, if one client asks the lawyer not to disclose information relevant to the representation to the other client, the lawyer must withdraw from representing both clients."}], "sampled": ["True. According to ABA Model Rule 1.7, a lawyer must not represent clients with conflicting interests unless certain conditions are met, including informed consent from both clients. If one client asks the lawyer not to disclose relevant information to the other client, this creates a conflict of interest, and the lawyer may need to withdraw from representing both clients under Model Rule 1.16."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:05:16.903525+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 209, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.68", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "False", "picked": null, "sampled": "True. According to ABA Model Rule 1.7, a lawyer must not represent clients with conflicting interests unless certain conditions are met, including informed consent from both clients. If one client asks the lawyer not to disclose relevant information to the other client, this creates a conflict of interest, and the lawyer may need to withdraw from representing both clients under Model Rule 1.16.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:05:16.903565+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 210, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.4", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer cannot accept representation if they do not currently possess the required level of competence."}], "sampled": ["True. According to ABA Model Rule 1.1, a lawyer must provide competent representation to a client, which requires the legal knowledge, skill, thoroughness, and preparation reasonably necessary for the representation. If a lawyer does not currently possess the required level of competence, they cannot accept the representation. However, a lawyer can still accept representation if they can become competent through reasonable preparation or by associating with a lawyer who is competent in the matter."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:05:18.319747+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 211, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.4", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "False", "picked": null, "sampled": "True. According to ABA Model Rule 1.1, a lawyer must provide competent representation to a client, which requires the legal knowledge, skill, thoroughness, and preparation reasonably necessary for the representation. If a lawyer does not currently possess the required level of competence, they cannot accept the representation. However, a lawyer can still accept representation if they can become competent through reasonable preparation or by associating with a lawyer who is competent in the matter.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:05:18.319787+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 212, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.98", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "If a client does not respond within 90 days after receiving notice of the proposed sale of their lawyer's practice, their consent to the transfer of their files is presumed."}], "sampled": ["False. According to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 1.17, there is no specific time frame mentioned for presuming a client's consent to the transfer of their files if they do not respond after receiving notice of the proposed sale of their lawyer's practice."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:05:20.811755+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 213, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.98", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "True", "picked": null, "sampled": "False. According to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 1.17, there is no specific time frame mentioned for presuming a client's consent to the transfer of their files if they do not respond after receiving notice of the proposed sale of their lawyer's practice.", "options": ["True"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:05:20.811804+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 214, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.11", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "In a criminal case, the lawyer has the final say in decisions regarding the client's plea, whether to waive jury trial, and whether the client will testify."}], "sampled": ["False. According to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, the client has the final say in decisions regarding their plea, whether to waive a jury trial, and whether they will testify in a criminal case. The lawyer's role is to provide advice and guidance, but the ultimate decision rests with the client."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:05:21.652152+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 215, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.11", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "False", "picked": "False", "sampled": "False. According to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, the client has the final say in decisions regarding their plea, whether to waive a jury trial, and whether they will testify in a criminal case. The lawyer's role is to provide advice and guidance, but the ultimate decision rests with the client.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:05:21.652191+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 216, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.108", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer shall not represent anyone in connection with a matter in which the lawyer participated personally and substantially as a judge or other adjudicative officer or law clerk to such a person or as an arbitrator, mediator or other third-party neutral, unless 5 years have passed after the laywer's last point of involvement."}], "sampled": ["False. According to ABA Model Rule 1.12(a), a lawyer shall not represent anyone in connection with a matter in which the lawyer participated personally and substantially as a judge or other adjudicative officer, or law clerk to such a person, or as an arbitrator, mediator, or other third-party neutral, unless all parties to the proceeding give informed consent, confirmed in writing. The rule does not specify a 5-year waiting period."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:05:21.809993+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 217, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.108", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "False", "picked": "False", "sampled": "False. According to ABA Model Rule 1.12(a), a lawyer shall not represent anyone in connection with a matter in which the lawyer participated personally and substantially as a judge or other adjudicative officer, or law clerk to such a person, or as an arbitrator, mediator, or other third-party neutral, unless all parties to the proceeding give informed consent, confirmed in writing. The rule does not specify a 5-year waiting period.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:05:21.810051+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 218, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.49", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are LawStudentGPT. Answer the following True/False question according to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lawyer is permitted to represent a client in a transaction where the lawyer's own conduct is in question, as long as the lawyer can provide competent and diligent representation."}], "sampled": ["False. According to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 1.7(a)(2), a lawyer cannot represent a client if there is a significant risk that the representation will be materially limited by the lawyer's own interest or by the lawyer's duties to another client, a former client, or a third person. If the lawyer's conduct is in question, it creates a conflict of interest that may materially limit the representation, and the lawyer should not represent the client in that transaction."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:05:28.234087+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220359H4SAGYKY", "event_id": 219, "sample_id": "aba_mrpc_true_false.dev.49", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "False", "picked": "False", "sampled": "False. According to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 1.7(a)(2), a lawyer cannot represent a client if there is a significant risk that the representation will be materially limited by the lawyer's own interest or by the lawyer's duties to another client, a former client, or a third person. If the lawyer's conduct is in question, it creates a conflict of interest that may materially limit the representation, and the lawyer should not represent the client in that transaction.", "options": ["False"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:05:28.234183+00:00"}
diff --git a/evals/country-area/countries-4.jsonl b/evals/country-area/countries-4.jsonl
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7014c203f2538bbfc555df0c12ec7d258693824b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/evals/country-area/countries-4.jsonl
@@ -0,0 +1,202 @@
+{"spec": {"completion_fns": ["gpt-4"], "eval_name": "compare-countries-area.dev.v0", "base_eval": "compare-countries-area", "split": "dev", "run_config": {"completion_fns": ["gpt-4"], "eval_spec": {"cls": "evals.elsuite.basic.match:Match", "args": {"samples_jsonl": "compare-countries-area/samples.jsonl"}, "key": "compare-countries-area.dev.v0", "group": "compare-countries-area"}, "seed": 20220722, "max_samples": null, "command": "/Users/acabrera/dev-research/22-zeno/openai-eval/evals/evals/cli/oaieval.py gpt-4 compare-countries-area", "initial_settings": {"visible": true}}, "created_by": "", "run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:00:53.948570"}}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 0, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.29", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Nigeria, Venezuela, Namibia, Mozambique"}], "sampled": ["Nigeria"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:00:55.316450+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 1, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.29", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "Nigeria", "picked": "Nigeria", "sampled": "Nigeria", "options": ["Nigeria"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:00:55.316539+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 2, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.75", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Guyana, Belarus, Kyrgyzstan, Senegal"}], "sampled": ["Kyrgyzstan"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:00:55.397253+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 3, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.75", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Guyana", "picked": null, "sampled": "Kyrgyzstan", "options": ["Guyana"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:00:55.397285+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 4, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.87", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Greece, Nicaragua, North Korea, Malawi"}], "sampled": ["North Korea"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:00:55.419556+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 5, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.87", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Greece", "picked": null, "sampled": "North Korea", "options": ["Greece"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:00:55.419591+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 6, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.93", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Honduras, Liberia, Bulgaria, Cuba"}], "sampled": ["Cuba"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:00:55.456541+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 7, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.93", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Honduras", "picked": null, "sampled": "Cuba", "options": ["Honduras"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:00:55.456579+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 8, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.7", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Kazakhstan, Algeria, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Saudi Arabia"}], "sampled": ["Kazakhstan"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:00:55.500769+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 9, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.7", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "Kazakhstan", "picked": "Kazakhstan", "sampled": "Kazakhstan", "options": ["Kazakhstan"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:00:55.500806+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 10, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.50", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Papua New Guinea, Uzbekistan, Iraq, Paraguay"}], "sampled": ["Uzbekistan"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:00:55.554841+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 11, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.50", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Papua New Guinea", "picked": null, "sampled": "Uzbekistan", "options": ["Papua New Guinea"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:00:55.554892+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 12, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.63", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Oman, Italy, Philippines, Burkina Faso"}], "sampled": ["Oman"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:00:55.646810+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 13, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.63", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "Oman", "picked": "Oman", "sampled": "Oman", "options": ["Oman"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:00:55.646872+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 14, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.67", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. New Zealand, Gabon, Guinea, United Kingdom"}], "sampled": ["Gabon"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:00:55.740755+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 15, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.67", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "New Zealand", "picked": null, "sampled": "Gabon", "options": ["New Zealand"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:00:55.740794+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 16, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.64", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Italy, Philippines, Burkina Faso, New Zealand"}], "sampled": ["Burkina Faso"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:00:55.856600+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 17, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.64", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Italy", "picked": null, "sampled": "Burkina Faso", "options": ["Italy"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:00:55.856648+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 18, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.44", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Kenya, Yemen, Thailand, Spain"}], "sampled": ["Spain"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:00:56.408689+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 19, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.44", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Kenya", "picked": null, "sampled": "Spain", "options": ["Kenya"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:00:56.408737+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 20, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.24", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Ethiopia, Bolivia, Mauritania, Egypt"}], "sampled": ["Egypt"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:00:56.466658+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 21, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.24", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Ethiopia", "picked": null, "sampled": "Egypt", "options": ["Ethiopia"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:00:56.466694+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 22, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.84", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Bangladesh, Nepal, Tajikistan, Greece"}], "sampled": ["Tajikistan"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:00:56.486987+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 23, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.84", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Bangladesh", "picked": null, "sampled": "Tajikistan", "options": ["Bangladesh"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:00:56.487033+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 24, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.60", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Malaysia, Cote d'Ivoire, Poland, Oman"}], "sampled": ["Malaysia"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:00:56.580569+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 25, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.60", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "Malaysia", "picked": "Malaysia", "sampled": "Malaysia", "options": ["Malaysia"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:00:56.580617+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 26, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.22", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. South Africa, Colombia, Ethiopia, Bolivia"}], "sampled": ["Bolivia"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:00:56.803035+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 27, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.22", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "South Africa", "picked": null, "sampled": "Bolivia", "options": ["South Africa"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:00:56.803093+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 28, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.1", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Canada, United States, Brazil, Australia"}], "sampled": ["Canada"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:00:56.916036+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 29, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.1", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "Canada", "picked": "Canada", "sampled": "Canada", "options": ["Canada"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:00:56.916096+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 30, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.9", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Democratic Republic of the Congo, Saudi Arabia, Mexico, Indonesia"}], "sampled": ["Saudi Arabia"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:00:56.938527+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 31, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.9", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Democratic Republic of the Congo", "picked": null, "sampled": "Saudi Arabia", "options": ["Democratic Republic of the Congo"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:00:56.938574+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 32, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.3", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Brazil, Australia, India, Argentina"}], "sampled": ["Brazil"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:00:56.984279+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 33, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.3", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "Brazil", "picked": "Brazil", "sampled": "Brazil", "options": ["Brazil"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:00:56.984312+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 34, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.14", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Libya, Iran, Mongolia, Peru"}], "sampled": ["Mongolia"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:00:57.226900+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 35, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.14", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Libya", "picked": null, "sampled": "Mongolia", "options": ["Libya"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:00:57.227007+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 36, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.45", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Yemen, Thailand, Spain, Turkmenistan"}], "sampled": ["Turkmenistan"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:00:57.615849+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 37, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.45", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Yemen", "picked": null, "sampled": "Turkmenistan", "options": ["Yemen"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:00:57.615910+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 38, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.85", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Nepal, Tajikistan, Greece, Nicaragua"}], "sampled": ["Nicaragua"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:00:57.758067+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 39, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.85", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Nepal", "picked": null, "sampled": "Nicaragua", "options": ["Nepal"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:00:57.758183+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 40, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.12", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Indonesia, Sudan, Libya, Iran"}], "sampled": ["Indonesia"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:00:57.842279+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 41, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.12", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "Indonesia", "picked": "Indonesia", "sampled": "Indonesia", "options": ["Indonesia"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:00:57.842360+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 42, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.10", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Saudi Arabia, Mexico, Indonesia, Sudan"}], "sampled": ["Saudi Arabia"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:00:57.858982+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 43, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.10", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "Saudi Arabia", "picked": "Saudi Arabia", "sampled": "Saudi Arabia", "options": ["Saudi Arabia"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:00:57.859028+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 44, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.74", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Laos, Guyana, Belarus, Kyrgyzstan"}], "sampled": ["Kyrgyzstan"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:00:58.055811+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 45, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.74", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Laos", "picked": null, "sampled": "Kyrgyzstan", "options": ["Laos"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:00:58.055857+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 46, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.54", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Zimbabwe, Japan, Germany, Republic of the Congo"}], "sampled": ["Republic of the Congo"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:00:58.133180+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 47, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.54", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Zimbabwe", "picked": null, "sampled": "Republic of the Congo", "options": ["Zimbabwe"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:00:58.133226+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 48, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.96", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Cuba, Guatemala, Iceland, South Korea"}], "sampled": ["Iceland"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:00:58.150770+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 49, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.96", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Cuba", "picked": null, "sampled": "Iceland", "options": ["Cuba"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:00:58.150811+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 50, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.28", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Tanzania, Nigeria, Venezuela, Namibia"}], "sampled": ["Tanzania"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:00:58.241408+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 51, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.28", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "Tanzania", "picked": "Tanzania", "sampled": "Tanzania", "options": ["Tanzania"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:00:58.241454+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 52, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.15", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Iran, Mongolia, Peru, Chad"}], "sampled": ["Mongolia"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:00:58.270289+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 53, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.15", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Iran", "picked": null, "sampled": "Mongolia", "options": ["Iran"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:00:58.270338+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 54, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.69", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Guinea, United Kingdom, Uganda, Ghana"}], "sampled": ["United Kingdom"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:00:58.697944+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 55, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.69", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Guinea", "picked": null, "sampled": "United Kingdom", "options": ["Guinea"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:00:58.698109+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 56, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.82", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Suriname, Tunisia, Bangladesh, Nepal"}], "sampled": ["Suriname"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:00:58.831838+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 57, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.82", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "Suriname", "picked": "Suriname", "sampled": "Suriname", "options": ["Suriname"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:00:58.831898+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 58, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.35", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Zambia, Morocco, Burma, Afghanistan"}], "sampled": ["Zambia"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:00:58.941127+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 59, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.35", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "Zambia", "picked": "Zambia", "sampled": "Zambia", "options": ["Zambia"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:00:58.941186+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 60, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.46", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Thailand, Spain, Turkmenistan, Cameroon"}], "sampled": ["Turkmenistan"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:00:59.068328+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 61, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.46", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Thailand", "picked": null, "sampled": "Turkmenistan", "options": ["Thailand"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:00:59.068384+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 62, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.83", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Tunisia, Bangladesh, Nepal, Tajikistan"}], "sampled": ["Tajikistan"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:00:59.114516+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 63, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.83", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Tunisia", "picked": null, "sampled": "Tajikistan", "options": ["Tunisia"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:00:59.114568+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 64, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.39", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Somalia, Central African Republic, Ukraine, Madagascar"}], "sampled": ["Ukraine"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:00:59.180474+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 65, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.39", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Somalia", "picked": null, "sampled": "Ukraine", "options": ["Somalia"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:00:59.180533+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 66, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.26", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Mauritania, Egypt, Tanzania, Nigeria"}], "sampled": ["Egypt"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:00:59.329501+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 67, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.26", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Mauritania", "picked": null, "sampled": "Egypt", "options": ["Mauritania"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:00:59.329549+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 68, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.23", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Colombia, Ethiopia, Bolivia, Mauritania"}], "sampled": ["Colombia"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:00:59.437241+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 69, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.23", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "Colombia", "picked": "Colombia", "sampled": "Colombia", "options": ["Colombia"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:00:59.437300+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 70, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.81", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Uruguay, Suriname, Tunisia, Bangladesh"}], "sampled": ["Uruguay"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:00:59.808527+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 71, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.81", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "Uruguay", "picked": "Uruguay", "sampled": "Uruguay", "options": ["Uruguay"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:00:59.808565+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 72, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.25", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Bolivia, Mauritania, Egypt, Tanzania"}], "sampled": ["Egypt"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:00:59.867368+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 73, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.25", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Bolivia", "picked": null, "sampled": "Egypt", "options": ["Bolivia"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:00:59.867408+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 74, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.27", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Egypt, Tanzania, Nigeria, Venezuela"}], "sampled": ["Egypt"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:00.190246+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 75, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.27", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "Egypt", "picked": "Egypt", "sampled": "Egypt", "options": ["Egypt"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:00.190301+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 76, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.91", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Eritrea, Benin, Honduras, Liberia"}], "sampled": ["Honduras"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:00.197211+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 77, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.91", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Eritrea", "picked": null, "sampled": "Honduras", "options": ["Eritrea"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:00.197275+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 78, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.41", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Ukraine, Madagascar, Botswana, Kenya"}], "sampled": ["Ukraine"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:00.285398+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 79, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.41", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "Ukraine", "picked": "Ukraine", "sampled": "Ukraine", "options": ["Ukraine"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:00.285455+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 80, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.56", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Germany, Republic of the Congo, Finland, Vietnam"}], "sampled": ["Republic of the Congo"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:00.301495+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 81, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.56", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Germany", "picked": null, "sampled": "Republic of the Congo", "options": ["Germany"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:00.301541+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 82, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.32", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Mozambique, Turkey (Turkiye), Chile, Zambia"}], "sampled": ["Turkey"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:00.425284+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 83, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.32", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Mozambique", "picked": null, "sampled": "Turkey", "options": ["Mozambique"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:00.425323+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 84, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.73", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Romania, Laos, Guyana, Belarus"}], "sampled": ["Romania"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:00.641117+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 85, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.73", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "Romania", "picked": "Romania", "sampled": "Romania", "options": ["Romania"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:00.641157+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 86, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.95", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Bulgaria, Cuba, Guatemala, Iceland"}], "sampled": ["Iceland"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:00.842373+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 87, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.95", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Bulgaria", "picked": null, "sampled": "Iceland", "options": ["Bulgaria"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:00.842412+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 88, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.80", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Cambodia, Uruguay, Suriname, Tunisia"}], "sampled": ["Suriname"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:01.207156+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 89, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.80", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Cambodia", "picked": null, "sampled": "Suriname", "options": ["Cambodia"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:01.207188+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 90, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.62", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Poland, Oman, Italy, Philippines"}], "sampled": ["Oman"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:01.293808+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 91, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.62", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Poland", "picked": null, "sampled": "Oman", "options": ["Poland"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:01.293837+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 92, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.33", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Turkey (Turkiye), Chile, Zambia, Morocco"}], "sampled": ["Turkey"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:01.420751+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 93, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.33", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Turkey (Turkiye)", "picked": null, "sampled": "Turkey", "options": ["Turkey (Turkiye)"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:01.420842+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 94, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.72", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Ghana, Romania, Laos, Guyana"}], "sampled": ["Romania"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:01.438715+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 95, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.72", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Ghana", "picked": null, "sampled": "Romania", "options": ["Ghana"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:01.438752+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 96, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.59", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Vietnam, Malaysia, Cote d'Ivoire, Poland"}], "sampled": ["Poland"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:01.610115+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 97, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.59", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Vietnam", "picked": null, "sampled": "Poland", "options": ["Vietnam"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:01.610162+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 98, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.58", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Finland, Vietnam, Malaysia, Cote d'Ivoire"}], "sampled": ["Finland"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:01.632806+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 99, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.58", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "Finland", "picked": "Finland", "sampled": "Finland", "options": ["Finland"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:01.632847+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 100, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.70", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. United Kingdom, Uganda, Ghana, Romania"}], "sampled": ["Romania"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:01.828989+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 101, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.70", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "United Kingdom", "picked": null, "sampled": "Romania", "options": ["United Kingdom"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:01.829030+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 102, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.51", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Uzbekistan, Iraq, Paraguay, Zimbabwe"}], "sampled": ["Uzbekistan"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:01.829704+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 103, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.51", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "Uzbekistan", "picked": "Uzbekistan", "sampled": "Uzbekistan", "options": ["Uzbekistan"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:01.829738+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 104, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.38", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Afghanistan, Somalia, Central African Republic, Ukraine"}], "sampled": ["Ukraine"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:01.849477+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 105, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.38", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Afghanistan", "picked": null, "sampled": "Ukraine", "options": ["Afghanistan"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:01.849521+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 106, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.47", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Spain, Turkmenistan, Cameroon, Papua New Guinea"}], "sampled": ["Turkmenistan"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:02.330502+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 107, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.47", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Spain", "picked": null, "sampled": "Turkmenistan", "options": ["Spain"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:02.330563+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 108, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.53", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Paraguay, Zimbabwe, Japan, Germany"}], "sampled": ["Paraguay"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:02.612420+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 109, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.53", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "Paraguay", "picked": "Paraguay", "sampled": "Paraguay", "options": ["Paraguay"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:02.612460+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 110, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.65", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Philippines, Burkina Faso, New Zealand, Gabon"}], "sampled": ["New Zealand"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:02.721642+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 111, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.65", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Philippines", "picked": null, "sampled": "New Zealand", "options": ["Philippines"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:02.721679+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 112, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.19", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Niger, Angola, Mali, South Africa"}], "sampled": ["Mali"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:02.798661+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 113, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.19", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Niger", "picked": null, "sampled": "Mali", "options": ["Niger"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:02.798700+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 114, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.61", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Cote d'Ivoire, Poland, Oman, Italy"}], "sampled": ["Oman"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:02.884042+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 115, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.61", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Cote d'Ivoire", "picked": null, "sampled": "Oman", "options": ["Cote d'Ivoire"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:02.884104+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 116, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.66", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Burkina Faso, New Zealand, Gabon, Guinea"}], "sampled": ["Guinea"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:03.036786+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 117, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.66", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Burkina Faso", "picked": null, "sampled": "Guinea", "options": ["Burkina Faso"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:03.036833+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 118, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.36", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Morocco, Burma, Afghanistan, Somalia"}], "sampled": ["Afghanistan"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:03.047561+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 119, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.36", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Morocco", "picked": null, "sampled": "Afghanistan", "options": ["Morocco"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:03.047613+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 120, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.49", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Cameroon, Papua New Guinea, Uzbekistan, Iraq"}], "sampled": ["Uzbekistan"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:03.323754+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 121, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.49", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Cameroon", "picked": null, "sampled": "Uzbekistan", "options": ["Cameroon"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:03.323803+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 122, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.21", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Mali, South Africa, Colombia, Ethiopia"}], "sampled": ["Mali"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:03.954457+00:00"}
+{"final_report": {"accuracy": 0.34}}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 123, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.21", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "Mali", "picked": "Mali", "sampled": "Mali", "options": ["Mali"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:03.966239+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 124, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.37", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Burma, Afghanistan, Somalia, Central African Republic"}], "sampled": ["Central African Republic"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:04.132253+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 125, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.37", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Burma", "picked": null, "sampled": "Central African Republic", "options": ["Burma"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:04.132295+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 126, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.78", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Senegal, Syria, Cambodia, Uruguay"}], "sampled": ["Senegal"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:04.246528+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 127, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.78", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "Senegal", "picked": "Senegal", "sampled": "Senegal", "options": ["Senegal"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:04.246577+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 128, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.77", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Kyrgyzstan, Senegal, Syria, Cambodia"}], "sampled": ["Kyrgyzstan"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:04.248201+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 129, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.77", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "Kyrgyzstan", "picked": "Kyrgyzstan", "sampled": "Kyrgyzstan", "options": ["Kyrgyzstan"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:04.248317+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 130, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.30", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Venezuela, Namibia, Mozambique, Turkey (Turkiye)"}], "sampled": ["Venezuela"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:04.249202+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 131, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.30", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "Venezuela", "picked": "Venezuela", "sampled": "Venezuela", "options": ["Venezuela"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:04.249277+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 132, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.5", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. India, Argentina, Kazakhstan, Algeria"}], "sampled": ["Kazakhstan"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:04.398013+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 133, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.5", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "India", "picked": null, "sampled": "Kazakhstan", "options": ["India"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:04.398073+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 134, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.16", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Mongolia, Peru, Chad, Niger"}], "sampled": ["Mongolia"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:04.467268+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 135, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.16", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "Mongolia", "picked": "Mongolia", "sampled": "Mongolia", "options": ["Mongolia"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:04.467315+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 136, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.2", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. United States, Brazil, Australia, India"}], "sampled": ["Russia"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:04.593204+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 137, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.2", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "United States", "picked": null, "sampled": "Russia", "options": ["United States"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:04.593284+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 138, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.94", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Liberia, Bulgaria, Cuba, Guatemala"}], "sampled": ["Cuba"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:04.601947+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 139, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.94", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Liberia", "picked": null, "sampled": "Cuba", "options": ["Liberia"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:04.601988+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 140, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.8", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Algeria, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Saudi Arabia, Mexico"}], "sampled": ["Democratic Republic of the Congo"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:05.358992+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 141, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.8", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Algeria", "picked": null, "sampled": "Democratic Republic of the Congo", "options": ["Algeria"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:05.359035+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 142, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.57", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Republic of the Congo, Finland, Vietnam, Malaysia"}], "sampled": ["Republic of the Congo"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:05.532228+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 143, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.57", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "Republic of the Congo", "picked": "Republic of the Congo", "sampled": "Republic of the Congo", "options": ["Republic of the Congo"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:05.532268+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 144, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.40", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Central African Republic, Ukraine, Madagascar, Botswana"}], "sampled": ["Ukraine"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:05.658089+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 145, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.40", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Central African Republic", "picked": null, "sampled": "Ukraine", "options": ["Central African Republic"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:05.658187+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 146, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.76", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Belarus, Kyrgyzstan, Senegal, Syria"}], "sampled": ["Kyrgyzstan"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:05.695281+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 147, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.76", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Belarus", "picked": null, "sampled": "Kyrgyzstan", "options": ["Belarus"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:05.695329+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 148, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.79", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Syria, Cambodia, Uruguay, Suriname"}], "sampled": ["Syria"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:05.820417+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 149, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.79", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "Syria", "picked": "Syria", "sampled": "Syria", "options": ["Syria"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:05.820489+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 150, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.18", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Chad, Niger, Angola, Mali"}], "sampled": ["Mali"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:05.930911+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 151, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.18", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Chad", "picked": null, "sampled": "Mali", "options": ["Chad"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:05.930949+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 152, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.55", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Japan, Germany, Republic of the Congo, Finland"}], "sampled": ["Republic of the Congo"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:06.082906+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 153, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.55", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Japan", "picked": null, "sampled": "Republic of the Congo", "options": ["Japan"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:06.082964+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 154, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.0", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Russia, Canada, United States, Brazil"}], "sampled": ["Russia"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:06.135911+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 155, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.0", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "Russia", "picked": "Russia", "sampled": "Russia", "options": ["Russia"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:06.135957+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 156, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.97", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Guatemala, Iceland, South Korea, Hungary"}], "sampled": ["Iceland"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:06.146102+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 157, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.97", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Guatemala", "picked": null, "sampled": "Iceland", "options": ["Guatemala"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:06.146137+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 158, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.92", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Benin, Honduras, Liberia, Bulgaria"}], "sampled": ["Honduras"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:06.432798+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 159, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.92", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Benin", "picked": null, "sampled": "Honduras", "options": ["Benin"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:06.432846+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 160, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.31", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Namibia, Mozambique, Turkey (Turkiye), Chile"}], "sampled": ["Namibia"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:06.803731+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 161, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.31", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "Namibia", "picked": "Namibia", "sampled": "Namibia", "options": ["Namibia"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:06.803790+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 162, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.86", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Tajikistan, Greece, Nicaragua, North Korea"}], "sampled": ["North Korea"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:06.883323+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 163, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.86", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Tajikistan", "picked": null, "sampled": "North Korea", "options": ["Tajikistan"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:06.883362+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 164, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.88", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Nicaragua, North Korea, Malawi, Eritrea"}], "sampled": ["North Korea"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:07.145276+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 165, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.88", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Nicaragua", "picked": null, "sampled": "North Korea", "options": ["Nicaragua"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:07.145307+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 166, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.90", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Malawi, Eritrea, Benin, Honduras"}], "sampled": ["Honduras"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:07.187047+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 167, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.90", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Malawi", "picked": null, "sampled": "Honduras", "options": ["Malawi"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:07.187077+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 168, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.89", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. North Korea, Malawi, Eritrea, Benin"}], "sampled": ["North Korea"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:07.259816+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 169, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.89", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "North Korea", "picked": "North Korea", "sampled": "North Korea", "options": ["North Korea"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:07.259875+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 170, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.43", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Botswana, Kenya, Yemen, Thailand"}], "sampled": ["Botswana"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:07.440412+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 171, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.43", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "Botswana", "picked": "Botswana", "sampled": "Botswana", "options": ["Botswana"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:07.440470+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 172, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.20", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Angola, Mali, South Africa, Colombia"}], "sampled": ["Mali"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:07.463677+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 173, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.20", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Angola", "picked": null, "sampled": "Mali", "options": ["Angola"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:07.463726+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 174, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.17", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Peru, Chad, Niger, Angola"}], "sampled": ["Chad"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:07.475710+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 175, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.17", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Peru", "picked": null, "sampled": "Chad", "options": ["Peru"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:07.475761+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 176, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.42", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Madagascar, Botswana, Kenya, Yemen"}], "sampled": ["Botswana"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:07.969527+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 177, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.42", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Madagascar", "picked": null, "sampled": "Botswana", "options": ["Madagascar"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:07.969566+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 178, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.71", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Uganda, Ghana, Romania, Laos"}], "sampled": ["Romania"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:08.059011+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 179, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.71", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Uganda", "picked": null, "sampled": "Romania", "options": ["Uganda"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:08.059056+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 180, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.11", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Mexico, Indonesia, Sudan, Libya"}], "sampled": ["Libya"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:08.231788+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 181, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.11", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Mexico", "picked": null, "sampled": "Libya", "options": ["Mexico"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:08.231848+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 182, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.13", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Sudan, Libya, Iran, Mongolia"}], "sampled": ["Mongolia"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:08.281839+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 183, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.13", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Sudan", "picked": null, "sampled": "Mongolia", "options": ["Sudan"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:08.281920+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 184, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.98", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Iceland, South Korea, Hungary, Portugal"}], "sampled": ["Iceland"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:08.299851+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 185, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.98", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "Iceland", "picked": "Iceland", "sampled": "Iceland", "options": ["Iceland"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:08.299910+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 186, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.68", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Gabon, Guinea, United Kingdom, Uganda"}], "sampled": ["Guinea"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:08.356606+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 187, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.68", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Gabon", "picked": null, "sampled": "Guinea", "options": ["Gabon"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:08.356665+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 188, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.48", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Turkmenistan, Cameroon, Papua New Guinea, Uzbekistan"}], "sampled": ["Turkmenistan"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:08.531996+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 189, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.48", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "Turkmenistan", "picked": "Turkmenistan", "sampled": "Turkmenistan", "options": ["Turkmenistan"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:08.532045+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 190, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.99", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. South Korea, Hungary, Portugal, Jordan"}], "sampled": ["Portugal"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:08.706003+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 191, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.99", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "South Korea", "picked": null, "sampled": "Portugal", "options": ["South Korea"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:08.706100+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 192, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.52", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Iraq, Paraguay, Zimbabwe, Japan"}], "sampled": ["Iraq"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:09.065081+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 193, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.52", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "Iraq", "picked": "Iraq", "sampled": "Iraq", "options": ["Iraq"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:09.065142+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 194, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.6", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Argentina, Kazakhstan, Algeria, Democratic Republic of the Congo"}], "sampled": ["Kazakhstan"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:09.292687+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 195, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.6", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Argentina", "picked": null, "sampled": "Kazakhstan", "options": ["Argentina"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:09.292736+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 196, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.4", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Australia, India, Argentina, Kazakhstan"}], "sampled": ["Kazakhstan"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:09.404514+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 197, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.4", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Australia", "picked": null, "sampled": "Kazakhstan", "options": ["Australia"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:09.404571+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 198, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.34", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Chile, Zambia, Morocco, Burma"}], "sampled": ["Chile"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:09.432356+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502220053WFIIYNGV", "event_id": 199, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.34", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "Chile", "picked": "Chile", "sampled": "Chile", "options": ["Chile"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 22:01:09.432446+00:00"}
diff --git a/evals/country-area/countries-turbo.jsonl b/evals/country-area/countries-turbo.jsonl
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f92074efce51ded69911c99c195bbfea9a87d154
--- /dev/null
+++ b/evals/country-area/countries-turbo.jsonl
@@ -0,0 +1,202 @@
+{"spec": {"completion_fns": ["gpt-3.5-turbo"], "eval_name": "compare-countries-area.dev.v0", "base_eval": "compare-countries-area", "split": "dev", "run_config": {"completion_fns": ["gpt-3.5-turbo"], "eval_spec": {"cls": "evals.elsuite.basic.match:Match", "args": {"samples_jsonl": "compare-countries-area/samples.jsonl"}, "key": "compare-countries-area.dev.v0", "group": "compare-countries-area"}, "seed": 20220722, "max_samples": null, "command": "/Users/acabrera/dev-research/22-zeno/openai-eval/evals/evals/cli/oaieval.py gpt-3.5-turbo compare-countries-area", "initial_settings": {"visible": true}}, "created_by": "", "run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:35.099929"}}
+{"final_report": {"accuracy": 0.3}}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 0, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.67", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. New Zealand, Gabon, Guinea, United Kingdom"}], "sampled": ["Gabon."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:36.196279+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 1, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.67", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "New Zealand", "picked": null, "sampled": "Gabon.", "options": ["New Zealand"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:36.196362+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 2, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.87", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Greece, Nicaragua, North Korea, Malawi"}], "sampled": ["North Korea."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:36.196597+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 3, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.87", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Greece", "picked": null, "sampled": "North Korea.", "options": ["Greece"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:36.196621+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 4, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.75", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Guyana, Belarus, Kyrgyzstan, Senegal"}], "sampled": ["Belarus."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:36.198275+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 5, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.75", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Guyana", "picked": null, "sampled": "Belarus.", "options": ["Guyana"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:36.198306+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 6, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.64", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Italy, Philippines, Burkina Faso, New Zealand"}], "sampled": ["Burkina Faso."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:36.203807+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 7, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.64", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Italy", "picked": null, "sampled": "Burkina Faso.", "options": ["Italy"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:36.203861+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 8, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.7", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Kazakhstan, Algeria, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Saudi Arabia"}], "sampled": ["Saudi Arabia."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:36.211767+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 9, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.7", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Kazakhstan", "picked": null, "sampled": "Saudi Arabia.", "options": ["Kazakhstan"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:36.211810+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 10, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.63", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Oman, Italy, Philippines, Burkina Faso"}], "sampled": ["Oman."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:36.212832+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 11, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.63", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "Oman", "picked": "Oman", "sampled": "Oman.", "options": ["Oman"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:36.212881+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 12, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.93", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Honduras, Liberia, Bulgaria, Cuba"}], "sampled": ["Cuba."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:36.214340+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 13, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.93", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Honduras", "picked": null, "sampled": "Cuba.", "options": ["Honduras"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:36.214379+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 14, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.50", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Papua New Guinea, Uzbekistan, Iraq, Paraguay"}], "sampled": ["Papua New Guinea."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:36.214620+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 15, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.50", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "Papua New Guinea", "picked": "Papua New Guinea", "sampled": "Papua New Guinea.", "options": ["Papua New Guinea"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:36.214650+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 16, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.84", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Bangladesh, Nepal, Tajikistan, Greece"}], "sampled": ["Tajikistan."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:36.217032+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 17, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.84", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Bangladesh", "picked": null, "sampled": "Tajikistan.", "options": ["Bangladesh"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:36.217170+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 18, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.29", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Nigeria, Venezuela, Namibia, Mozambique"}], "sampled": ["Mozambique."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:36.322842+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 19, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.29", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Nigeria", "picked": null, "sampled": "Mozambique.", "options": ["Nigeria"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:36.322877+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 20, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.24", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Ethiopia, Bolivia, Mauritania, Egypt"}], "sampled": ["Mauritania."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:36.926448+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 21, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.24", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Ethiopia", "picked": null, "sampled": "Mauritania.", "options": ["Ethiopia"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:36.926501+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 22, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.9", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Democratic Republic of the Congo, Saudi Arabia, Mexico, Indonesia"}], "sampled": ["Democratic Republic of the Congo."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:36.986074+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 23, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.9", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "Democratic Republic of the Congo", "picked": "Democratic Republic of the Congo", "sampled": "Democratic Republic of the Congo.", "options": ["Democratic Republic of the Congo"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:36.986124+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 24, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.60", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Malaysia, Cote d'Ivoire, Poland, Oman"}], "sampled": ["Oman."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:37.035113+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 25, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.60", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Malaysia", "picked": null, "sampled": "Oman.", "options": ["Malaysia"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:37.035149+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 26, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.14", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Libya, Iran, Mongolia, Peru"}], "sampled": ["Mongolia."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:37.047574+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 27, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.14", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Libya", "picked": null, "sampled": "Mongolia.", "options": ["Libya"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:37.047611+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 28, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.3", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Brazil, Australia, India, Argentina"}], "sampled": ["Australia."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:37.069281+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 29, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.3", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Brazil", "picked": null, "sampled": "Australia.", "options": ["Brazil"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:37.069346+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 30, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.44", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Kenya, Yemen, Thailand, Spain"}], "sampled": ["Spain."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:37.088344+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 31, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.44", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Kenya", "picked": null, "sampled": "Spain.", "options": ["Kenya"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:37.088434+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 32, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.28", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Tanzania, Nigeria, Venezuela, Namibia"}], "sampled": ["Namibia."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:37.127536+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 33, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.28", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Tanzania", "picked": null, "sampled": "Namibia.", "options": ["Tanzania"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:37.127569+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 34, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.22", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. South Africa, Colombia, Ethiopia, Bolivia"}], "sampled": ["Bolivia."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:37.132650+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 35, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.22", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "South Africa", "picked": null, "sampled": "Bolivia.", "options": ["South Africa"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:37.132683+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 36, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.1", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Canada, United States, Brazil, Australia"}], "sampled": ["Canada."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:37.136727+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 37, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.1", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "Canada", "picked": "Canada", "sampled": "Canada.", "options": ["Canada"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:37.136758+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 38, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.45", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Yemen, Thailand, Spain, Turkmenistan"}], "sampled": ["Turkmenistan."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:37.159589+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 39, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.45", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Yemen", "picked": null, "sampled": "Turkmenistan.", "options": ["Yemen"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:37.159625+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 40, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.12", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Indonesia, Sudan, Libya, Iran"}], "sampled": ["Indonesia."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:37.609789+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 41, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.12", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "Indonesia", "picked": "Indonesia", "sampled": "Indonesia.", "options": ["Indonesia"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:37.609838+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 42, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.85", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Nepal, Tajikistan, Greece, Nicaragua"}], "sampled": ["Tajikistan."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:37.810015+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 43, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.85", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Nepal", "picked": null, "sampled": "Tajikistan.", "options": ["Nepal"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:37.810054+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 44, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.69", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Guinea, United Kingdom, Uganda, Ghana"}], "sampled": ["Guinea."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:37.850210+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 45, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.69", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "Guinea", "picked": "Guinea", "sampled": "Guinea.", "options": ["Guinea"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:37.850250+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 46, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.74", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Laos, Guyana, Belarus, Kyrgyzstan"}], "sampled": ["Belarus."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:37.858665+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 47, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.74", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Laos", "picked": null, "sampled": "Belarus.", "options": ["Laos"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:37.858719+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 48, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.15", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Iran, Mongolia, Peru, Chad"}], "sampled": ["Mongolia."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:37.879389+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 49, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.15", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Iran", "picked": null, "sampled": "Mongolia.", "options": ["Iran"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:37.879430+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 50, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.46", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Thailand, Spain, Turkmenistan, Cameroon"}], "sampled": ["Turkmenistan."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:37.882585+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 51, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.46", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Thailand", "picked": null, "sampled": "Turkmenistan.", "options": ["Thailand"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:37.882623+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 52, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.10", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Saudi Arabia, Mexico, Indonesia, Sudan"}], "sampled": ["Saudi Arabia."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:37.909125+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 53, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.10", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "Saudi Arabia", "picked": "Saudi Arabia", "sampled": "Saudi Arabia.", "options": ["Saudi Arabia"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:37.909166+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 54, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.96", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Cuba, Guatemala, Iceland, South Korea"}], "sampled": ["Guatemala."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:37.911764+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 55, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.96", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Cuba", "picked": null, "sampled": "Guatemala.", "options": ["Cuba"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:37.911857+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 56, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.54", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Zimbabwe, Japan, Germany, Republic of the Congo"}], "sampled": ["Republic of the Congo."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:38.019666+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 57, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.54", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Zimbabwe", "picked": null, "sampled": "Republic of the Congo.", "options": ["Zimbabwe"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:38.019730+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 58, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.39", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Somalia, Central African Republic, Ukraine, Madagascar"}], "sampled": ["Madagascar."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:38.533738+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 59, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.39", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Somalia", "picked": null, "sampled": "Madagascar.", "options": ["Somalia"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:38.533796+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 60, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.83", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Tunisia, Bangladesh, Nepal, Tajikistan"}], "sampled": ["Tajikistan."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:38.552079+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 61, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.83", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Tunisia", "picked": null, "sampled": "Tajikistan.", "options": ["Tunisia"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:38.552139+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 62, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.91", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Eritrea, Benin, Honduras, Liberia"}], "sampled": ["Honduras."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:38.646058+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 63, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.91", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Eritrea", "picked": null, "sampled": "Honduras.", "options": ["Eritrea"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:38.646097+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 64, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.47", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Spain, Turkmenistan, Cameroon, Papua New Guinea"}], "sampled": ["Turkmenistan."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:38.710861+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 65, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.47", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Spain", "picked": null, "sampled": "Turkmenistan.", "options": ["Spain"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:38.710900+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 66, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.82", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Suriname, Tunisia, Bangladesh, Nepal"}], "sampled": ["Nepal."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:38.750414+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 67, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.82", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Suriname", "picked": null, "sampled": "Nepal.", "options": ["Suriname"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:38.750453+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 68, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.35", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Zambia, Morocco, Burma, Afghanistan"}], "sampled": ["Burma (also known as Myanmar) has the largest area among the given countries."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:38.772538+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 69, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.35", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Zambia", "picked": null, "sampled": "Burma (also known as Myanmar) has the largest area among the given countries.", "options": ["Zambia"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:38.772591+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 70, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.56", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Germany, Republic of the Congo, Finland, Vietnam"}], "sampled": ["Republic of the Congo."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:38.796903+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 71, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.56", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Germany", "picked": null, "sampled": "Republic of the Congo.", "options": ["Germany"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:38.796959+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 72, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.23", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Colombia, Ethiopia, Bolivia, Mauritania"}], "sampled": ["Mauritania."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:38.809186+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 73, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.23", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Colombia", "picked": null, "sampled": "Mauritania.", "options": ["Colombia"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:38.809224+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 74, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.26", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Mauritania, Egypt, Tanzania, Nigeria"}], "sampled": ["Nigeria."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:38.875003+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 75, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.26", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Mauritania", "picked": null, "sampled": "Nigeria.", "options": ["Mauritania"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:38.875050+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 76, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.81", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Uruguay, Suriname, Tunisia, Bangladesh"}], "sampled": ["Bangladesh."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:38.921603+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 77, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.81", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Uruguay", "picked": null, "sampled": "Bangladesh.", "options": ["Uruguay"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:38.921658+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 78, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.27", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Egypt, Tanzania, Nigeria, Venezuela"}], "sampled": ["Nigeria."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:39.366286+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 79, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.27", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Egypt", "picked": null, "sampled": "Nigeria.", "options": ["Egypt"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:39.366326+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 80, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.95", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Bulgaria, Cuba, Guatemala, Iceland"}], "sampled": ["Guatemala."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:39.395015+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 81, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.95", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Bulgaria", "picked": null, "sampled": "Guatemala.", "options": ["Bulgaria"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:39.395053+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 82, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.32", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Mozambique, Turkey (Turkiye), Chile, Zambia"}], "sampled": ["Mozambique."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:39.404087+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 83, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.32", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "Mozambique", "picked": "Mozambique", "sampled": "Mozambique.", "options": ["Mozambique"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:39.404133+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 84, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.41", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Ukraine, Madagascar, Botswana, Kenya"}], "sampled": ["Botswana."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:39.410442+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 85, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.41", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Ukraine", "picked": null, "sampled": "Botswana.", "options": ["Ukraine"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:39.410480+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 86, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.73", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Romania, Laos, Guyana, Belarus"}], "sampled": ["Belarus."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:39.417983+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 87, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.73", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Romania", "picked": null, "sampled": "Belarus.", "options": ["Romania"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:39.418020+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 88, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.62", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Poland, Oman, Italy, Philippines"}], "sampled": ["Oman."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:39.439179+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 89, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.62", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Poland", "picked": null, "sampled": "Oman.", "options": ["Poland"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:39.439212+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 90, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.25", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Bolivia, Mauritania, Egypt, Tanzania"}], "sampled": ["Tanzania."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:39.444596+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 91, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.25", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Bolivia", "picked": null, "sampled": "Tanzania.", "options": ["Bolivia"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:39.444627+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 92, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.58", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Finland, Vietnam, Malaysia, Cote d'Ivoire"}], "sampled": ["Finland."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:39.614038+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 93, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.58", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "Finland", "picked": "Finland", "sampled": "Finland.", "options": ["Finland"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:39.614080+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 94, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.80", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Cambodia, Uruguay, Suriname, Tunisia"}], "sampled": ["Suriname."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:39.624795+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 95, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.80", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Cambodia", "picked": null, "sampled": "Suriname.", "options": ["Cambodia"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:39.624838+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 96, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.72", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Ghana, Romania, Laos, Guyana"}], "sampled": ["Guyana."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:39.757173+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 97, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.72", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Ghana", "picked": null, "sampled": "Guyana.", "options": ["Ghana"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:39.757233+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 98, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.19", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Niger, Angola, Mali, South Africa"}], "sampled": ["Angola."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:40.049794+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 99, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.19", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Niger", "picked": null, "sampled": "Angola.", "options": ["Niger"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:40.049879+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 100, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.21", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Mali, South Africa, Colombia, Ethiopia"}], "sampled": ["Mali."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:40.079659+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 101, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.21", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "Mali", "picked": "Mali", "sampled": "Mali.", "options": ["Mali"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:40.079699+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 102, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.70", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. United Kingdom, Uganda, Ghana, Romania"}], "sampled": ["Uganda."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:40.092396+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 103, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.70", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "United Kingdom", "picked": null, "sampled": "Uganda.", "options": ["United Kingdom"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:40.092442+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 104, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.33", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Turkey (Turkiye), Chile, Zambia, Morocco"}], "sampled": ["Turkey (Turkiye)"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:40.144668+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 105, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.33", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "Turkey (Turkiye)", "picked": "Turkey (Turkiye)", "sampled": "Turkey (Turkiye)", "options": ["Turkey (Turkiye)"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:40.144707+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 106, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.38", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Afghanistan, Somalia, Central African Republic, Ukraine"}], "sampled": ["Ukraine."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:40.168881+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 107, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.38", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Afghanistan", "picked": null, "sampled": "Ukraine.", "options": ["Afghanistan"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:40.168924+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 108, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.53", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Paraguay, Zimbabwe, Japan, Germany"}], "sampled": ["Paraguay."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:40.230957+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 109, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.53", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "Paraguay", "picked": "Paraguay", "sampled": "Paraguay.", "options": ["Paraguay"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:40.231000+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 110, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.49", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Cameroon, Papua New Guinea, Uzbekistan, Iraq"}], "sampled": ["Papua New Guinea."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:40.259760+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 111, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.49", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Cameroon", "picked": null, "sampled": "Papua New Guinea.", "options": ["Cameroon"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:40.259859+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 112, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.59", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Vietnam, Malaysia, Cote d'Ivoire, Poland"}], "sampled": ["Poland."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:40.261878+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 113, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.59", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Vietnam", "picked": null, "sampled": "Poland.", "options": ["Vietnam"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:40.261937+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 114, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.51", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Uzbekistan, Iraq, Paraguay, Zimbabwe"}], "sampled": ["Uzbekistan."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:40.354815+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 115, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.51", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "Uzbekistan", "picked": "Uzbekistan", "sampled": "Uzbekistan.", "options": ["Uzbekistan"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:40.354887+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 116, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.65", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Philippines, Burkina Faso, New Zealand, Gabon"}], "sampled": ["Gabon."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:40.427189+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 117, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.65", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Philippines", "picked": null, "sampled": "Gabon.", "options": ["Philippines"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:40.427258+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 118, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.78", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Senegal, Syria, Cambodia, Uruguay"}], "sampled": ["Uruguay."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:40.655154+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 119, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.78", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Senegal", "picked": null, "sampled": "Uruguay.", "options": ["Senegal"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:40.655192+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 120, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.66", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Burkina Faso, New Zealand, Gabon, Guinea"}], "sampled": ["New Zealand."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:40.735295+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 121, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.66", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Burkina Faso", "picked": null, "sampled": "New Zealand.", "options": ["Burkina Faso"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:40.735332+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 122, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.30", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Venezuela, Namibia, Mozambique, Turkey (Turkiye)"}], "sampled": ["Mozambique."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:40.753142+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 123, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.30", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Venezuela", "picked": null, "sampled": "Mozambique.", "options": ["Venezuela"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:40.753173+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 124, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.61", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Cote d'Ivoire, Poland, Oman, Italy"}], "sampled": ["Oman."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:40.799350+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 125, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.61", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Cote d'Ivoire", "picked": null, "sampled": "Oman.", "options": ["Cote d'Ivoire"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:40.799402+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 126, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.36", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Morocco, Burma, Afghanistan, Somalia"}], "sampled": ["Burma."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:40.864399+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 127, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.36", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Morocco", "picked": null, "sampled": "Burma.", "options": ["Morocco"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:40.864450+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 128, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.37", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Burma, Afghanistan, Somalia, Central African Republic"}], "sampled": ["Burma."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:40.985833+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 129, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.37", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "Burma", "picked": "Burma", "sampled": "Burma.", "options": ["Burma"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:40.985887+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 130, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.77", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Kyrgyzstan, Senegal, Syria, Cambodia"}], "sampled": ["Kyrgyzstan."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:41.104581+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 131, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.77", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "Kyrgyzstan", "picked": "Kyrgyzstan", "sampled": "Kyrgyzstan.", "options": ["Kyrgyzstan"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:41.104622+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 132, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.2", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. United States, Brazil, Australia, India"}], "sampled": ["Australia."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:41.118383+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 133, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.2", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "United States", "picked": null, "sampled": "Australia.", "options": ["United States"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:41.118424+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 134, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.16", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Mongolia, Peru, Chad, Niger"}], "sampled": ["Mongolia."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:41.146608+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 135, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.16", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "Mongolia", "picked": "Mongolia", "sampled": "Mongolia.", "options": ["Mongolia"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:41.146647+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 136, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.94", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Liberia, Bulgaria, Cuba, Guatemala"}], "sampled": ["Guatemala."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:41.169158+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 137, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.94", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Liberia", "picked": null, "sampled": "Guatemala.", "options": ["Liberia"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:41.169193+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 138, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.18", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Chad, Niger, Angola, Mali"}], "sampled": ["Angola."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:41.176598+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 139, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.18", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Chad", "picked": null, "sampled": "Angola.", "options": ["Chad"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:41.176629+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 140, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.5", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. India, Argentina, Kazakhstan, Algeria"}], "sampled": ["Kazakhstan."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:41.240907+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 141, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.5", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "India", "picked": null, "sampled": "Kazakhstan.", "options": ["India"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:41.240940+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 142, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.57", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Republic of the Congo, Finland, Vietnam, Malaysia"}], "sampled": ["Republic of the Congo."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:41.312591+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 143, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.57", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "Republic of the Congo", "picked": "Republic of the Congo", "sampled": "Republic of the Congo.", "options": ["Republic of the Congo"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:41.312644+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 144, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.40", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Central African Republic, Ukraine, Madagascar, Botswana"}], "sampled": ["Central African Republic."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:41.525494+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 145, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.40", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "Central African Republic", "picked": "Central African Republic", "sampled": "Central African Republic.", "options": ["Central African Republic"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:41.525551+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 146, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.8", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Algeria, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Saudi Arabia, Mexico"}], "sampled": ["Saudi Arabia."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:41.609392+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 147, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.8", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Algeria", "picked": null, "sampled": "Saudi Arabia.", "options": ["Algeria"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:41.609446+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 148, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.79", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Syria, Cambodia, Uruguay, Suriname"}], "sampled": ["Suriname."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:41.678751+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 149, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.79", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Syria", "picked": null, "sampled": "Suriname.", "options": ["Syria"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:41.678802+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 150, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.92", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Benin, Honduras, Liberia, Bulgaria"}], "sampled": ["Bulgaria."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:41.737124+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 151, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.92", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Benin", "picked": null, "sampled": "Bulgaria.", "options": ["Benin"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:41.737161+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 152, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.97", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Guatemala, Iceland, South Korea, Hungary"}], "sampled": ["Guatemala."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:41.754621+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 153, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.97", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "Guatemala", "picked": "Guatemala", "sampled": "Guatemala.", "options": ["Guatemala"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:41.754671+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 154, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.55", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Japan, Germany, Republic of the Congo, Finland"}], "sampled": ["Republic of the Congo."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:41.781319+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 155, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.55", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Japan", "picked": null, "sampled": "Republic of the Congo.", "options": ["Japan"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:41.781352+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 156, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.0", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Russia, Canada, United States, Brazil"}], "sampled": ["Russia."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:41.899045+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 157, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.0", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "Russia", "picked": "Russia", "sampled": "Russia.", "options": ["Russia"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:41.899133+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 158, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.31", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Namibia, Mozambique, Turkey (Turkiye), Chile"}], "sampled": ["Namibia."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:42.102190+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 159, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.31", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "Namibia", "picked": "Namibia", "sampled": "Namibia.", "options": ["Namibia"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:42.102236+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 160, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.76", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Belarus, Kyrgyzstan, Senegal, Syria"}], "sampled": ["Belarus."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:42.155424+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 161, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.76", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "Belarus", "picked": "Belarus", "sampled": "Belarus.", "options": ["Belarus"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:42.155488+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 162, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.86", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Tajikistan, Greece, Nicaragua, North Korea"}], "sampled": ["Tajikistan."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:42.168199+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 163, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.86", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "Tajikistan", "picked": "Tajikistan", "sampled": "Tajikistan.", "options": ["Tajikistan"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:42.168240+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 164, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.89", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. North Korea, Malawi, Eritrea, Benin"}], "sampled": ["Eritrea."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:42.302618+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 165, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.89", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "North Korea", "picked": null, "sampled": "Eritrea.", "options": ["North Korea"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:42.302779+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 166, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.90", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Malawi, Eritrea, Benin, Honduras"}], "sampled": ["Honduras."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:42.322366+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 167, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.90", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Malawi", "picked": null, "sampled": "Honduras.", "options": ["Malawi"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:42.322418+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 168, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.17", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Peru, Chad, Niger, Angola"}], "sampled": ["Angola."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:42.356199+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 169, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.17", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Peru", "picked": null, "sampled": "Angola.", "options": ["Peru"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:42.356254+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 170, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.20", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Angola, Mali, South Africa, Colombia"}], "sampled": ["Angola."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:42.395308+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 171, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.20", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "Angola", "picked": "Angola", "sampled": "Angola.", "options": ["Angola"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:42.395360+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 172, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.99", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. South Korea, Hungary, Portugal, Jordan"}], "sampled": ["Jordan."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:42.422946+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 173, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.99", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "South Korea", "picked": null, "sampled": "Jordan.", "options": ["South Korea"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:42.423005+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 174, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.88", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Nicaragua, North Korea, Malawi, Eritrea"}], "sampled": ["North Korea."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:42.501000+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 175, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.88", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Nicaragua", "picked": null, "sampled": "North Korea.", "options": ["Nicaragua"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:42.501094+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 176, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.43", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Botswana, Kenya, Yemen, Thailand"}], "sampled": ["Botswana."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:42.569761+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 177, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.43", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "Botswana", "picked": "Botswana", "sampled": "Botswana.", "options": ["Botswana"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:42.569805+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 178, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.42", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Madagascar, Botswana, Kenya, Yemen"}], "sampled": ["Madagascar."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:42.767918+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 179, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.42", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "Madagascar", "picked": "Madagascar", "sampled": "Madagascar.", "options": ["Madagascar"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:42.768004+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 180, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.71", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Uganda, Ghana, Romania, Laos"}], "sampled": ["Uganda."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:42.774420+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 181, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.71", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "Uganda", "picked": "Uganda", "sampled": "Uganda.", "options": ["Uganda"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:42.774474+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 182, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.68", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Gabon, Guinea, United Kingdom, Uganda"}], "sampled": ["Uganda."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:42.846498+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 183, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.68", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Gabon", "picked": null, "sampled": "Uganda.", "options": ["Gabon"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:42.846584+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 184, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.98", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Iceland, South Korea, Hungary, Portugal"}], "sampled": ["Iceland."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:42.889205+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 185, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.98", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "Iceland", "picked": "Iceland", "sampled": "Iceland.", "options": ["Iceland"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:42.889288+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 186, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.48", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Turkmenistan, Cameroon, Papua New Guinea, Uzbekistan"}], "sampled": ["Papua New Guinea."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:42.906358+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 187, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.48", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Turkmenistan", "picked": null, "sampled": "Papua New Guinea.", "options": ["Turkmenistan"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:42.906406+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 188, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.52", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Iraq, Paraguay, Zimbabwe, Japan"}], "sampled": ["Iraq."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:43.014388+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 189, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.52", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "Iraq", "picked": "Iraq", "sampled": "Iraq.", "options": ["Iraq"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:43.014423+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 190, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.13", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Sudan, Libya, Iran, Mongolia"}], "sampled": ["Mongolia."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:43.052116+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 191, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.13", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Sudan", "picked": null, "sampled": "Mongolia.", "options": ["Sudan"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:43.052152+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 192, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.4", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Australia, India, Argentina, Kazakhstan"}], "sampled": ["Australia."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:43.090386+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 193, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.4", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "Australia", "picked": "Australia", "sampled": "Australia.", "options": ["Australia"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:43.090443+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 194, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.11", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Mexico, Indonesia, Sudan, Libya"}], "sampled": ["Indonesia."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:43.166065+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 195, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.11", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Mexico", "picked": null, "sampled": "Indonesia.", "options": ["Mexico"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:43.166145+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 196, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.34", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Chile, Zambia, Morocco, Burma"}], "sampled": ["Burma."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:43.198599+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 197, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.34", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Chile", "picked": null, "sampled": "Burma.", "options": ["Chile"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:43.198696+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 198, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.6", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are presented with several countries. Answer the name of the country with the largest area among the given countries. Do not explain. Argentina, Kazakhstan, Algeria, Democratic Republic of the Congo"}], "sampled": ["Kazakhstan."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:43.375919+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502214435SJ6IKUJX", "event_id": 199, "sample_id": "compare-countries-area.dev.6", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "Argentina", "picked": null, "sampled": "Kazakhstan.", "options": ["Argentina"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 21:44:43.375958+00:00"}
diff --git a/evals/country-area/country-areas.csv b/evals/country-area/country-areas.csv
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0a461362a50fa0db8db3f71ca78a6e121f29a79e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/evals/country-area/country-areas.csv
@@ -0,0 +1,264 @@
+Rank,country,Total in km2 (mi2),land,Water in km2 (mi2),% water,Notes
+–,World,"510,072,000 (196,940,000)","148,940,000 (57,510,000)","361,132,000 (139,434,000)",70.8,
+1,Russia,"17,098,246 (6,601,670)","16,378,410 (6,323,740)","719,836 (277,930)",4.2,
+–,Antarctica,"14,200,000 (5,500,000)","14,200,000 (5,500,000)",0 (0),0,
+2,Canada,"9,984,670 (3,855,100)","9,093,507 (3,511,023)","891,163 (344,080)",8.9,
+3 or 4,China,"9,596,961 (3,705,407)","9,326,410 (3,600,950)","270,550 (104,460)",2.8,
+3 or 4,United States,"9,833,517 (3,796,742)","9,147,593 (3,531,905)","685,924 (264,837)",7.0,
+5,Brazil,"8,515,767 (3,287,956)","8,460,415 (3,266,584)","55,352 (21,372)",0.6,
+6,Australia,"7,692,024 (2,969,907)","7,633,565 (2,947,336)","58,459 (22,571)",0.8,
+7,India,"3,287,263 (1,269,219)","2,973,190 (1,147,960)","314,073 (121,264)",9.6,
+8,Argentina,"2,780,400 (1,073,500)","2,736,690 (1,056,640)","43,710 (16,880)",1.6,
+9,Kazakhstan,"2,724,900 (1,052,100)","2,699,700 (1,042,400)","25,200 (9,700)",0.9,
+10,Algeria,"2,381,741 (919,595)","2,381,741 (919,595)",0 (0),0,
+11,DR Congo,"2,344,858 (905,355)","2,267,048 (875,312)","77,810 (30,040)",3.3,
+–,Kingdom of Denmark,"2,220,093 (857,183)","2,220,072 (857,175)",21 (8.1),0,
+–,Greenland (Denmark),"2,166,086 (836,330)","2,166,086 (836,330)",0 (0),0,
+12,Saudi Arabia,"2,149,690 (830,000)","2,149,690 (830,000)",0 (0),0,
+13,Mexico,"1,964,375 (758,449)","1,943,945 (750,561)","20,430 (7,890)",1.0,
+14,Indonesia,"1,904,569 (735,358)","1,811,569 (699,451)","93,000 (36,000)",4.9,
+15,Sudan,"1,861,484 (718,723)","1,731,671 (668,602)","129,813 (50,121)",7.0,
+16,Libya,"1,759,540 (679,360)","1,759,540 (679,360)",0 (0),0,
+17,Iran,"1,648,195 (636,372)","1,531,595 (591,352)","116,600 (45,000)",7.1,
+18,Mongolia,"1,564,110 (603,910)","1,553,556 (599,831)","10,560 (4,080)",0.7,
+19,Peru,"1,285,216 (496,225)","1,279,996 (494,209)","5,220 (2,020)",0.4,
+20,Chad,"1,284,000 (496,000)","1,259,200 (486,200)","24,800 (9,600)",1.9,
+21,Niger,"1,267,000 (489,000)","1,266,700 (489,100)",300 (120),0,
+22,Angola,"1,246,700 (481,400)","1,246,700 (481,400)",0 (0),0,
+23,Mali,"1,240,192 (478,841)","1,220,190 (471,120)","20,002 (7,723)",1.6,
+24,South Africa,"1,221,037 (471,445)","1,214,470 (468,910)","4,620 (1,780)",0.4,
+25,Colombia,"1,141,748 (440,831)","1,038,700 (401,000)","100,210 (38,690)",8.8,
+26,Ethiopia,"1,104,300 (426,400)","1,096,630 (423,410)","7,670 (2,960)",0.7,
+27,Bolivia,"1,098,581 (424,164)","1,083,301 (418,265)","15,280 (5,900)",1.4,
+28,Mauritania,"1,030,700 (398,000)","1,025,520 (395,960)","4,480 (1,730)",0.4,
+29,Egypt,"1,002,450 (387,050)","995,450 (384,350)","6,000 (2,300)",0.6,
+30,Tanzania,"945,087 (364,900)","885,800 (342,000)","61,500 (23,700)",6.5,
+31,Nigeria,"923,768 (356,669)","910,768 (351,649)","13,000 (5,000)",1.4,
+32,Venezuela,"916,445 (353,841)","882,050 (340,560)","30,000 (12,000)",3.3,
+33,Pakistan,"881,913 (340,509)","856,690 (330,770)","25,223 (9,739)",2.9,
+34,Namibia,"825,615 (318,772)","823,290 (317,870)","2,425 (936)",0.3,
+35,Mozambique,"801,590 (309,500)","786,380 (303,620)","13,000 (5,000)",1.6,
+36,Turkey,"783,562 (302,535)","769,632 (297,157)","13,930 (5,380)",1.8,
+37,Chile,"756,102 (291,933)","743,812 (287,187)","12,290 (4,750)",1.6,
+38,Zambia,"752,612 (290,585)","743,398 (287,028)","9,220 (3,560)",1.2,
+39,Myanmar,"676,578 (261,228)","653,508 (252,321)","23,070 (8,910)",3.4,
+40,Afghanistan,"652,867 (252,073)","652,867 (252,073)",0 (0),0
+41,South Sudan,"644,329 (248,777)","644,329 (248,777)",0 (0),0,
+42,France,"640,679 (247,368)","640,427 (247,270)","3,374 (1,303)",0.5,
+43,Somalia,"637,657 (246,201)","627,337 (242,216)","10,320 (3,980)",1.6,
+44,Central African Republic,"622,984 (240,535)","622,984 (240,535)",0 (0),0,
+45,Ukraine,"603,550 (233,030)","579,300 (223,700)","24,250 (9,360)",4.0,
+46,Madagascar,"587,041 (226,658)","581,540 (224,530)","5,501 (2,124)",0.9,
+47,Botswana,"581,730 (224,610)","566,730 (218,820)","15,000 (5,800)",2.6,
+48,Kenya,"580,367 (224,081)","569,140 (219,750)","11,227 (4,335)",1.9,
+49,Yemen,"555,000 (214,000)","555,000 (214,000)",0 (0),0,
+–,France (metropolitan),"543,940 (210,020)",,,,
+50,Thailand,"513,120 (198,120)","510,890 (197,260)","2,230 (860)",0.4,
+51,Spain,"505,992 (195,365)","498,980 (192,660)","6,390 (2,470)",1.3,
+52,Turkmenistan,"488,100 (188,500)","469,930 (181,440)","18,170 (7,020)",3.7,
+53,Cameroon,"475,442 (183,569)","472,710 (182,510)","2,730 (1,050)",0.6,
+54,Papua New Guinea,"462,840 (178,700)","452,860 (174,850)","9,980 (3,850)",2.2,
+55,Sweden,"447,425 (172,752)","407,284 (157,253)","40,142 (15,499)",9.0,
+56,Uzbekistan,"447,400 (172,700)","425,400 (164,200)","22,000 (8,500)",4.9,
+57,Morocco,"446,550 (172,410)","446,300 (172,300)",250 (97),0.1,
+58,Iraq,"438,317 (169,235)","437,367 (168,868)",950 (370),0.2,
+59,Paraguay,"406,752 (157,048)","397,302 (153,399)","9,450 (3,650)",2.3,
+60,Zimbabwe,"390,757 (150,872)","386,847 (149,362)","3,910 (1,510)",1.0,
+61,Norway,"385,207 (148,729)","365,957 (141,297)","19,520 (7,540)",5.1,
+62,Japan,"377,976 (145,937)","364,546 (140,752)","13,430 (5,190)",3.6,
+63,Germany,"357,114 (137,882)","348,672 (134,623)","8,350 (3,220)",2.3,
+64,Congo,"342,000 (132,000)","341,500 (131,900)",500 (190),0.1,
+65,Finland,"338,425 (130,667)","303,816 (117,304)","34,330 (13,250)",10.1,
+66,Vietnam,"331,212 (127,882)","310,070 (119,720)","21,140 (8,160)",6.4,
+67,Malaysia,"330,803 (127,724)","329,613 (127,264)","1,190 (460)",0.4,
+–,Norway (mainland),"323,802 (125,021)","304,282 (117,484)","19,520 (7,540)",6.0,
+68,Ivory Coast,"322,463 (124,504)","318,003 (122,782)","4,460 (1,720)",1.4,
+69,Poland,"312,696 (120,733)","311,888 (120,421)",791 (305),0.3,
+70,Oman,"309,500 (119,500)","309,500 (119,500)",0 (0),0,
+71,Italy,"301,339 (116,348)","294,140 (113,570)","7,200 (2,800)",2.4,
+72,Philippines,"300,000 (120,000)","298,170 (115,120)","1,830 (710)",0.6,
+73,Ecuador,"276,841 (106,889)","256,369 (98,985)","6,720 (2,590)",2.4,
+74,Burkina Faso,"274,222 (105,878)","273,602 (105,638)",620 (240),0.2,
+75,New Zealand,"270,467 (104,428)","262,443 (101,330)","4,395 (1,697)",1.6,
+76,Gabon,"267,668 (103,347)","257,667 (99,486)","10,001 (3,861)",3.7,
+–,Western Sahara,"266,000 (103,000)","266,000 (103,000)",0 (0),0,
+77,Guinea,"245,857 (94,926)","245,717 (94,872)",140 (54),0.1,
+78,United Kingdom,"242,495 (93,628)","241,930 (93,410)","1,680 (650)",0.7,
+79,Uganda,"241,550 (93,260)","197,100 (76,100)","43,938 (16,965)",18.2,
+80,Ghana,"238,533 (92,098)","227,533 (87,851)","11,000 (4,200)",4.6,
+81,Romania,"238,397 (92,046)","231,291 (89,302)","7,100 (2,700)",3.0,
+82,Laos,"236,800 (91,400)","230,800 (89,100)","6,000 (2,300)",2.5,
+83,Guyana,"214,969 (83,000)","196,849 (76,004)","18,120 (7,000)",8.4,
+84,Belarus,"207,600 (80,200)","202,900 (78,300)","4,700 (1,800)",2.3,
+85,Kyrgyzstan,"199,951 (77,202)","191,801 (74,055)","8,150 (3,150)",4.1,
+86,Senegal,"196,722 (75,955)","192,530 (74,340)","4,192 (1,619)",2.1,
+87,Syria,"185,180 (71,500)","183,630 (70,900)","1,550 (600)",0.8,
+88,Cambodia,"181,035 (69,898)","176,515 (68,153)","4,520 (1,750)",2.5,
+89,Uruguay,"176,215 (68,037)","175,015 (67,574)","1,200 (460)",0.7,
+–,Somaliland,"176,120 (68,000)",,,,
+90,Suriname,"163,820 (63,250)","156,000 (60,000)","7,820 (3,020)",4.8,
+91,Tunisia,"163,610 (63,170)","155,360 (59,980)","8,250 (3,190)",5.0,
+92,Bangladesh,"148,460 (57,320)","134,208 (51,818)","14,252 (5,503)",9.6,
+93,Nepal,"147,516 (56,956)","143,686 (55,477)","3,830 (1,480)",2.6,
+94,Tajikistan,"143,100 (55,300)","141,510 (54,640)","2,590 (1,000)",1.8,
+95,Greece,"131,957 (50,949)","130,647 (50,443)","1,310 (510)",1.0,
+96,Nicaragua,"130,373 (50,337)","119,990 (46,330)","10,380 (4,010)",8.0,
+97,Eritrea,"125,000 (48,000)","125,000 (48,000)",0 (0),0,
+98,North Korea,"120,540 (46,540)","120,538 (46,540)",2 (0.77),0,
+99,Malawi,"118,484 (45,747)","94,080 (36,320)","24,404 (9,422)",20.6,
+100,Benin,"114,763 (44,310)","114,305 (44,133)",457.569 (176.668),0.4,
+101,Honduras,"112,492 (43,433)","111,890 (43,200)",200 (77),0.2,
+102,Liberia,"111,369 (43,000)","96,320 (37,190)","15,049 (5,810)",13.5,
+103,Bulgaria,"111,002 (42,858)","108,612 (41,935)","2,390 (920)",2.2,
+104,Cuba,"109,884 (42,426)","109,884 (42,426)",0 (0),0,
+105,Guatemala,"108,889 (42,042)","107,159 (41,374)","1,730 (670)",1.6,
+106,Iceland,"103,000 (40,000)","100,250 (38,710)","2,750 (1,060)",2.7,
+107,South Korea,"100,210 (38,690)","99,909 (38,575)",301 (116),0.3,
+108,Hungary,"93,028 (35,918)","89,608 (34,598)","3,420 (1,320)",3.7,
+109,Portugal,"92,226 (35,609)","91,119 (35,181)","1,107 (427)",1.2,
+110,Jordan,"89,342 (34,495)","88,802 (34,287)",540 (210),0.6,
+111,Serbia,"88,361 (34,116)","88,246 (34,072)",115 (44),0.1,
+112,Azerbaijan,"86,600 (33,400)","86,100 (33,200)",500 (190),0.6,
+113,Austria,"83,871 (32,383)","82,445 (31,832)","1,426 (551)",1.7,
+114,United Arab Emirates,"83,600 (32,300)","83,600 (32,300)",0 (0),0,
+115,Czech Republic,"78,871 (30,452)","77,187 (29,802)","1,684 (650)",2.1,
+116,Panama,"75,417 (29,119)","74,340 (28,700)","1,080 (420)",1.4,
+117,Sierra Leone,"71,740 (27,700)","71,620 (27,650)",120 (46),0.2,
+118,Ireland,"70,273 (27,133)","68,883 (26,596)","1,390 (540)",2.0,
+119,Georgia,"69,700 (26,900)","69,700 (26,900)",0 (0),0,
+120,Sri Lanka,"65,610 (25,330)","62,732 (24,221)","2,878 (1,111)",4.4,
+121,Lithuania,"65,300 (25,200)","62,680 (24,200)","2,620 (1,010)",4.0,
+122,Latvia,"64,559 (24,926)","62,249 (24,034)","2,340 (900)",3.6,
+–,Svalbard (Norway),"62,045 (23,956)","62,045 (23,956)",0 (0),0,
+123,Togo,"56,785 (21,925)","54,385 (20,998)","2,400 (930)",4.2,
+124,Croatia,"56,594 (21,851)","55,974 (21,612)",620 (240),1.1,
+125,Bosnia and Herzegovina,"51,209 (19,772)","51,187 (19,763)",10 (3.9),0,
+126,Costa Rica,"51,100 (19,700)","51,060 (19,710)",40 (15),0.1,
+127,Slovakia,"49,037 (18,933)","48,105 (18,573)",930 (360),1.9,
+128,Dominican Republic,"48,671 (18,792)","48,320 (18,660)",350 (140),0.7,
+129,Estonia,"45,227 (17,462)","42,388 (16,366)","2,840 (1,100)",6.3,
+130,Denmark,"43,094 (16,639)","42,434 (16,384)",660 (250),1.5,
+131,Netherlands,"41,850 (16,160)","33,893 (13,086)","7,957 (3,072)",19.0,
+132,Switzerland,"41,284 (15,940)","39,997 (15,443)","1,280 (490)",3.1,
+133,Bhutan,"38,394 (14,824)","38,394 (14,824)",0 (0),0,
+–,Taiwan,"36,193 (13,974)","32,260 (12,460)","3,720 (1,440)",10.3,
+134,Guinea-Bissau,"36,125 (13,948)","28,120 (10,860)","8,005 (3,091)",22.2,
+135,Moldova,"33,846 (13,068)","32,891 (12,699)",960 (370),2.8,
+136,Belgium,"30,528 (11,787)","30,278 (11,690)",250 (97),0.8,
+137,Lesotho,"30,355 (11,720)","30,355 (11,720)",0 (0),0,
+138,Armenia,"29,743 (11,484)","28,342 (10,943)","1,401 (541)",4.7,
+139,Solomon Islands,"28,896 (11,157)","27,986 (10,805)",910 (350),3.1,
+140,Albania,"28,748 (11,100)","27,398 (10,578)","1,350 (520)",4.7,
+141,Equatorial Guinea,"28,051 (10,831)","28,051 (10,831)",0 (0),0,
+142,Burundi,"27,834 (10,747)","25,680 (9,920)","2,150 (830)",7.7,
+143,Haiti,"27,750 (10,710)","27,560 (10,640)",190 (73),0.7,
+144,Rwanda,"26,338 (10,169)","24,668 (9,524)","1,670 (640)",6.3,
+145,North Macedonia,"25,713 (9,928)","25,433 (9,820)",280 (110),1.1,
+146,Djibouti,"23,200 (9,000)","23,180 (8,950)",20 (7.7),0.1,
+147,Belize,"22,966 (8,867)","22,806 (8,805)",160 (62),0.7,
+148,El Salvador,"21,041 (8,124)","20,721 (8,000)",320 (120),1.5,
+149,Israel,"20,770 (8,020)","20,330 (7,850)",440 (170),2.1,
+150,Slovenia,"20,273 (7,827)","20,151 (7,780)",122 (47),0.6,
+–,New Caledonia (France),"18,575 (7,172)","18,275 (7,056)",300 (120),1.6,
+151,Fiji,"18,272 (7,055)","18,274 (7,056)",0 (0),0,
+152,Kuwait,"17,818 (6,880)","17,818 (6,880)",0 (0),0,
+153,Eswatini,"17,364 (6,704)","17,204 (6,643)",160 (62),0.9,
+154,East Timor,"14,919 (5,760)","14,919 (5,760)",0 (0),0,
+155,Bahamas,"13,943 (5,383)","10,010 (3,860)","3,870 (1,490)",27.8,
+156,Montenegro,"13,812 (5,333)","13,452 (5,194)",360 (140),2.6,
+157,Vanuatu,"12,189 (4,706)","12,189 (4,706)",0 (0),0,
+–,Falkland Islands (United Kingdom),"12,173 (4,700)","12,173 (4,700)",0 (0),0,
+158,Qatar,"11,586 (4,473)","11,586 (4,473)",0 (0),0,
+159,Gambia,"11,295 (4,361)","10,000 (3,900)","1,295 (500)",11.5,
+160,Jamaica,"10,991 (4,244)","10,831 (4,182)",160 (62),1.5,
+–,Kosovo,"10,887 (4,203)",,,,
+161,Lebanon,"10,452 (4,036)","10,230 (3,950)",170 (66),1.6,
+162,Cyprus,"9,251 (3,572)","9,241 (3,568)",10 (3.9),0.1,
+–,Puerto Rico (United States),"9,104 (3,515)","8,959 (3,459)",145 (56),1.6,
+–,Abkhazia,"8,660 (3,340)",,,,
+–,French Southern Territories (France),"7,747 (2,991)","7,668 (2,961)",79.8 (30.8),1.0,
+163,Palestine,"6,220 (2,400)","6,000 (2,300)",220 (85),3.5,
+164,Brunei,"5,765 (2,226)","5,265 (2,033)",500 (190),8.7,
+165,Trinidad and Tobago,"5,130 (1,980)","5,128 (1,980)",0 (0),0,
+–,French Polynesia (France),"4,167 (1,609)","3,827 (1,478)",340 (130),8.2,
+–,Transnistria,"4,163 (1,607)",,,,
+166,Cape Verde,"4,033 (1,557)","4,033 (1,557)",0 (0),0,
+–,South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands (United Kingdom),"3,903 (1,507)","3,903 (1,507)",0 (0),0,
+–,South Ossetia,"3,900 (1,500)",,,,
+–,Northern Cyprus,"3,355 (1,295)",,,,
+–,Artsakh,"3,170 (1,220)","3,170 (1,220)",-,-,
+167,Samoa,"2,842 (1,097)","2,821 (1,089)",10 (3.9),0.4,
+–,Hong Kong (China),"2,755 (1,064)","1,106 (427)","1,649 (637)",59.9,
+168,Luxembourg,"2,586 (998)","2,586 (998)",0 (0),0,
+–,Bir Tawil (terra nullius),"2,060 (800)","2,060 (800)",0 (0),0,
+169,Mauritius,"2,040 (790)","2,030 (780)",10 (3.9),0.5,
+170,Comoros,"1,862 (719)","1,862 (719)",0 (0),0,
+–,Åland (Finland),"1,580 (610)",,,,
+–,Faroe Islands (Denmark),"1,399 (540)","1,393 (538)",negligible,negl.,
+171,São Tomé and Príncipe,964 (372),964 (372),0 (0),0,
+–,Turks and Caicos Islands (United Kingdom),948 (366),430 (170),0 (0),0,
+172,Kiribati,811 (313),811 (313),0 (0),0,
+173,Bahrain,786 (303),786 (303),0 (0),0,
+174,Dominica,751 (290),751 (290),0 (0),0,
+175,Tonga,747 (288),717 (277),30 (12),4.0,
+176,Singapore,728 (281),716 (276),10 (3.9),1.4,
+177,Micronesia,702 (271),702 (271),negligible,negl.,
+178,Saint Lucia,616 (238),606 (234),10 (3.9),1.6,
+–,Isle of Man (British Crown Dependency),572 (221),572 (221),0 (0),0,
+–,Guam (United States),549 (212),544 (210),0 (0),0,
+179,Andorra,468 (181),468 (181),0 (0),0,
+–,Northern Mariana Islands (United States),464 (179),464 (179),0 (0),0,
+180,Palau,459 (177),459 (177),0 (0),0,
+181,Seychelles,452 (175),455 (176),0 (0),0,
+–,Curaçao (Netherlands),444 (171),444 (171),0 (0),0,
+182,Antigua and Barbuda,442 (171),442 (171),0 (0),0,
+183,Barbados,430 (170),431 (166),0 (0),0,
+–,Heard Island and McDonald Islands (Australia),412 (159),412 (159),0 (0),0,
+184,Saint Vincent and the Grenadines,389 (150),389 (150),0 (0),0,
+–,Jan Mayen (Norway),377 (146),377 (146),0 (0),0,
+–,U.S. Virgin Islands (United States),347 (134),346 (134),negligible,negl.,
+185,Grenada,344 (133),344 (133),0 (0),0,
+186,Malta,316 (122),316 (122),0 (0),0,
+–,"Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha (United Kingdom)",308 (119),308 (119),0 (0),0,
+187,Maldives,300 (120),298 (115),0 (0),0,
+–,Bonaire (Netherlands),294 (114),294 (114),0 (0),0,
+–,Cayman Islands (United Kingdom),264 (102),264 (102),0 (0),0,
+188,Saint Kitts and Nevis,261 (101),261 (101),0 (0),0,
+–,Niue,260 (100),260 (100),0 (0),0,
+–,Akrotiri and Dhekelia (United Kingdom),254 (98),not determined,not determined,not det.,
+–,Saint Pierre and Miquelon (France),242 (93),242 (93),0 (0),0,
+–,Cook Islands,236 (91),236 (91),0 (0),0,
+–,American Samoa (United States),199 (77),199 (77),0 (0),0,
+189,Marshall Islands,181 (70),181 (70),0 (0),0,
+–,Aruba (Netherlands),180 (69),180 (69),0 (0),0,
+–,Easter Island (Chile),163 (63),163 (63),0 (0),0,
+190,Liechtenstein,160 (62),160 (62),0 (0),0,
+–,British Virgin Islands (United Kingdom),151 (58),151 (58),0 (0),0,
+–,Wallis and Futuna (France),142 (55),142 (55),0 (0),0,
+–,Christmas Island (Australia),135 (52),135 (52),0 (0),0,
+–,Jersey (British Crown Dependency),116 (45),116 (45),0 (0),0,
+–,Montserrat (United Kingdom),102 (39),102 (39),0 (0),0,
+–,Anguilla (United Kingdom),91 (35),91 (35),0 (0),0,
+–,Guernsey (British Crown Dependency),78 (30),78 (30),0 (0),0,
+191,San Marino,61 (24),61 (24),0 (0),0,
+–,British Indian Ocean Territory (United Kingdom),60 (23),60 (23),negligible,negl.,
+–,Saint Martin (France),54 (21),54.4 (21.0),negligible,negl.,
+–,Bermuda (United Kingdom),54 (21),54 (21),0 (0),0,
+–,Bouvet Island (Norway),49 (19),49 (19),0 (0),0,
+–,Pitcairn Islands (United Kingdom),47 (18),47 (18),0 (0),0,
+–,Norfolk Island (Australia),36 (14),36 (14),0 (0),0,
+–,Sint Maarten (Netherlands),34 (13),34 (13),0 (0),0,
+–,Macao (China),31 (12),28 (11),0 (0),0,
+192,Tuvalu,26 (10),26 (10),0 (0),0,
+193,Nauru,21 (8.1),21 (8.1),0 (0),0,
+–,Saint Barthélemy (France),21 (8.1),not determined,not determined,not det.,
+–,Sint Eustatius (Netherlands),21 (8.1),not determined,not determined,not det.,
+–,United States Minor Outlying Islands,19 (7.3),19 (7.3),0 (0),0,
+–,Cocos (Keeling) Islands (Australia),14 (5.4),14 (5.4),0 (0),0,
+–,Saba (Netherlands),13 (5.0),not determined,not determined,not det.,
+–,Tokelau (New Zealand),12 (4.6),12 (4.6),0 (0),0,
+–,Gibraltar (United Kingdom),6 (2.3),6.5 (2.5),0 (0),0,
+–,Clipperton Island (France),6 (2.3),2 (0.77),4 (1.5),66.7,
+–,Ashmore and Cartier Islands (Australia),5 (1.9),5 (1.9),0 (0),0,
+194,Monaco,2.02 (0.78),2.02 (0.78),0 (0),0,
+195,Vatican City,0.49 (0.19),0.49 (0.19),0 (0),0,
diff --git a/evals/country-area/country_fns.py b/evals/country-area/country_fns.py
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4a9e3d769be38f9dfc65c516b25200be7af2bb5d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/evals/country-area/country_fns.py
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+import os
+
+import pandas as pd
+from zeno import DistillReturn, distill
+
+# read file from same directory as this file
+area_df = pd.read_csv(os.path.dirname(__file__) + "/country-areas.csv")
+# set index to country
+area_df.set_index("country", inplace=True)
+# given a string like 23,180 (8,950) extract the first number
+
+area_df = area_df[area_df["land"] != "not determined"]
+area_df["area"] = area_df["land"].apply(
+    lambda x: x if isinstance(x, float) else float(x.split(" ")[0].replace(",", ""))
+)
+
+
+@distill
+def area(df, ops):
+    areas = []
+    for output in df[ops.label_column]:
+        if output in area_df.index:
+            areas.append(area_df.loc[output]["area"])
+        else:
+            areas.append(-1)
+    return DistillReturn(distill_output=areas)
diff --git a/evals/emotional-intelligence/emotional-intelligence-0301.jsonl b/evals/emotional-intelligence/emotional-intelligence-0301.jsonl
deleted file mode 100644
index ee5e86b61b5e5df41f48767ada33d3a244119aed..0000000000000000000000000000000000000000
--- a/evals/emotional-intelligence/emotional-intelligence-0301.jsonl
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,202 +0,0 @@
-{"spec": {"completion_fns": ["gpt-3.5-turbo-0301"], "eval_name": "emotional-intelligence.dev.v0", "base_eval": "emotional-intelligence", "split": "dev", "run_config": {"completion_fns": ["gpt-3.5-turbo-0301"], "eval_spec": {"cls": "evals.elsuite.basic.match:Match", "args": {"samples_jsonl": "emotional-intelligence/samples.jsonl"}, "key": "emotional-intelligence.dev.v0", "group": "emotional-intelligence"}, "seed": 20220722, "max_samples": null, "command": "/Users/acabrera/dev-research/22-zeno/openai-eval/evals/evals/cli/oaieval.py gpt-3.5-turbo-0301 emotional-intelligence", "initial_settings": {"visible": true}}, "created_by": "", "run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:08.158157"}}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 0, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.75", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. The following questions each describe a situation, and ask you to choose which of five emotions is most likely to result from that situation. Here is an example: Clara receives a gift Clara is most likely to feel?  (a) happy (b) angry (c) frightened (d) bored (e) hungry. If you think Clara would feel happy, you would mark option A and then move to the next question. Select the most emotionally intelligent response by returning the one lowercase letter ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd') corresponding to that response."}, {"role": "user", "content": "By chance, a situation arises where there is the possibility that a person will get what they want. The person is most likely to feel? (a) Distress; (b) Hope; (c) Surprise; (d) Joy; (e) Fear"}], "sampled": ["(b) Hope."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:08.956954+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 1, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.75", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "b", "picked": null, "sampled": "(b) Hope.", "options": ["b"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:08.957021+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 2, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.50", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. The following questions each describe a situation, and ask you to choose which of five emotions is most likely to result from that situation. Here is an example: Clara receives a gift Clara is most likely to feel?  (a) happy (b) angry (c) frightened (d) bored (e) hungry. If you think Clara would feel happy, you would mark option A and then move to the next question. Select the most emotionally intelligent response by returning the one lowercase letter ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd') corresponding to that response."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Something unpleasant is happening. Neither the person involved, nor anyone else can make it stop. The person involved is most likely to feel? (a) Guilty; (b) Distressed; (c) Sad; (d) Scared; (e) Angry"}], "sampled": ["(b) Distressed."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:08.957249+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 3, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.50", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "b", "picked": null, "sampled": "(b) Distressed.", "options": ["b"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:08.957274+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 4, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.29", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from four responses the most effective course of action to manage both the emotions the person is feeling and the problems they face in that situation. Although more than one course of action might be acceptable, you are asked to choose what you think the most effective response for that person in that situation would be. Remember, you are not necessarily choosing what you would do, or the nicest thing to do, but choosing the most effective response for that situation. Select one or more response(s) by returning the one or more corresponding lowercase letter(s) ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd'), and, if you selected more than one, sorting them, separated by hyphen, in the order that you think best ranks them from most to least effective, within the context of the vignette provided."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Billy is nervous about acting a scene when there are a lot of very experienced actors in the crowd. What action would be the most effective for Billy? (a) Put things in perspective 3 it is not the end of the world; (b) Use some acting techniques to clam his nerves; (c) Believe in himself and know it will be fine; (d) Practice his scenes more so that he will act well."}], "sampled": ["b-c-d"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:08.959867+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 5, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.29", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "b-d-a", "picked": null, "sampled": "b-c-d", "options": ["b-d-a"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:08.959916+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 6, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.67", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. The following questions each describe a situation, and ask you to choose which of five emotions is most likely to result from that situation. Here is an example: Clara receives a gift Clara is most likely to feel?  (a) happy (b) angry (c) frightened (d) bored (e) hungry. If you think Clara would feel happy, you would mark option A and then move to the next question. Select the most emotionally intelligent response by returning the one lowercase letter ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd') corresponding to that response."}, {"role": "user", "content": "By their own actions, a person reaches a goal they wanted to reach. The person is most likely to feel? (a) Joy; (b) Hope; (c) Relief; (d) Pride; (e) Surprise"}], "sampled": ["(d) Pride."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:08.964376+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 7, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.67", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "d", "picked": null, "sampled": "(d) Pride.", "options": ["d"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:08.964416+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 8, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.64", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. The following questions each describe a situation, and ask you to choose which of five emotions is most likely to result from that situation. Here is an example: Clara receives a gift Clara is most likely to feel?  (a) happy (b) angry (c) frightened (d) bored (e) hungry. If you think Clara would feel happy, you would mark option A and then move to the next question. Select the most emotionally intelligent response by returning the one lowercase letter ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd') corresponding to that response."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Garry's small business is attracting less and less clients and he can't tell why. There doesn't seem to be anything he can do to help matters. Garry is most likely to feel? (a) Scared; (b) Angry; (c) Sad; (d) Guilty; (e) Distressed"}], "sampled": ["(c) Sad"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:08.998635+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 9, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.64", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "e", "picked": null, "sampled": "(c) Sad", "options": ["e"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:08.998682+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 10, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.87", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from among four responses what you would be most likely to do in the situation. Please note, there are no right or wrong answers. We all deal with situations in different ways. All that you need to do is answer each question honestly. Select the most emotionally intelligent response by returning the one lowercase letter ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd') corresponding to that response."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A man felt secure and accepted and later he felt depressed. What happened in between? (a) He received a compliment intended for someone else; (b) He discovered his wife was cheating on him; (c) A friend became ill; (d) A package he mailed to a friend was delivered to the wrong person; (e) He was frustrated by a bad job he did on a project"}], "sampled": ["(b) He discovered his wife was cheating on him."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:09.357871+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 11, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.87", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "b", "picked": null, "sampled": "(b) He discovered his wife was cheating on him.", "options": ["b"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:09.357913+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 12, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.60", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. The following questions each describe a situation, and ask you to choose which of five emotions is most likely to result from that situation. Here is an example: Clara receives a gift Clara is most likely to feel?  (a) happy (b) angry (c) frightened (d) bored (e) hungry. If you think Clara would feel happy, you would mark option A and then move to the next question. Select the most emotionally intelligent response by returning the one lowercase letter ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd') corresponding to that response."}, {"role": "user", "content": "If all goes well, then it's fairly likely that Derek's house will increase in value. Derek is most likely to feel? (a) Distress; (b) Fear; (c) Surprise; (d) Joy; (e) Hope"}], "sampled": ["(d) Joy"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:09.666227+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 13, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.60", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "e", "picked": null, "sampled": "(d) Joy", "options": ["e"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:09.666303+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 14, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.63", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. The following questions each describe a situation, and ask you to choose which of five emotions is most likely to result from that situation. Here is an example: Clara receives a gift Clara is most likely to feel?  (a) happy (b) angry (c) frightened (d) bored (e) hungry. If you think Clara would feel happy, you would mark option A and then move to the next question. Select the most emotionally intelligent response by returning the one lowercase letter ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd') corresponding to that response."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Mary was working at her desk. Something happened that caused her to feel surprised. What is most likely to have happened? (a) Her work-mate told a silly joke; (b) She was working on a new task she hadn't dealt with before; (c) She found some results that were different from what she thought they would be; (d) She realized she would not be able to complete her work; (e) She had to do a task she didn't normally do at work."}], "sampled": ["(c) She found some results that were different from what she thought they would be."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:09.683608+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 15, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.63", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "c", "picked": null, "sampled": "(c) She found some results that were different from what she thought they would be.", "options": ["c"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:09.683648+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 16, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.84", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. The following questions each describe a situation, and ask you to choose which of five emotions is most likely to result from that situation. Here is an example: Clara receives a gift Clara is most likely to feel?  (a) happy (b) angry (c) frightened (d) bored (e) hungry. If you think Clara would feel happy, you would mark option A and then move to the next question. Select the most emotionally intelligent response by returning the one lowercase letter ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd') corresponding to that response."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Matthew has been at his current job for six months. Something happened that caused him to feel regret. What is most likely to have happened? (a) He did not apply for a position he wanted, and has found out that someone else less qualified got the job; (b) He did not apply for a position he wanted, and has started looking for a similar position; (c) He found out that opportunities for promotion have dried up; (d) He found out that he didn't get a position he thought he would get; (e) He didn't hear about a position he could have applied for and now it is too late."}], "sampled": ["(d) He found out that he didn't get a position he thought he would get."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:09.728994+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 17, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.84", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "a", "picked": null, "sampled": "(d) He found out that he didn't get a position he thought he would get.", "options": ["a"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:09.729071+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 18, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.93", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from among four responses what you would be most likely to do in the situation. Please note, there are no right or wrong answers. We all deal with situations in different ways. All that you need to do is answer each question honestly. Select one or more response(s) by returning the one or more corresponding lowercase letter(s) ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd'), and, if you selected more than one, sorting them, separated by hyphen, in the order that you think best ranks them from most to least effective, within the context of the vignette provided."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You have not spoken to your favorite cousin for months, although you were both very close when you were younger. You phone your cousin but he/she can only talk for five minutes. What would you do in this situation? (a) Understand that relationships change, but call your cousin from time to time; (b) Make plans to drop by and visit your cousin in person and have a good chat; (c) Realize that your cousin is growing up and might not want to spend so much time with the family anymore; (d) Be upset about it, but realize there is nothing you can really do"}], "sampled": ["a) Understand that relationships change, but call your cousin from time to time."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:09.748417+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 19, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.93", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "a-b-c-d", "picked": null, "sampled": "a) Understand that relationships change, but call your cousin from time to time.", "options": ["a-b-c-d"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:09.748451+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 20, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.44", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. The following questions each describe a situation, and ask you to choose which of five emotions is most likely to result from that situation. Here is an example: Clara receives a gift Clara is most likely to feel?  (a) happy (b) angry (c) frightened (d) bored (e) hungry. If you think Clara would feel happy, you would mark option A and then move to the next question. Select the most emotionally intelligent response by returning the one lowercase letter ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd') corresponding to that response."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A pleasant experience ceases unexpectedly and there is not much that can be done about it. The person involved is most likely to feel? (a) Ashamed; (b) Distressed; (c) Angry; (d) Sad; (e) Frustrated"}], "sampled": ["(d) Sad."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:09.983909+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 21, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.44", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "d", "picked": null, "sampled": "(d) Sad.", "options": ["d"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:09.983968+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 22, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.45", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. The following questions each describe a situation, and ask you to choose which of five emotions is most likely to result from that situation. Here is an example: Clara receives a gift Clara is most likely to feel?  (a) happy (b) angry (c) frightened (d) bored (e) hungry. If you think Clara would feel happy, you would mark option A and then move to the next question. Select the most emotionally intelligent response by returning the one lowercase letter ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd') corresponding to that response."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Xavier completes a difficult task on time and under budget. Xavier is most likely to feel? (a) Surprise; (b) Pride; (c) Relief; (d) Hope; (e) Joy"}], "sampled": ["(b) Pride."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:10.383209+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 23, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.45", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "b", "picked": null, "sampled": "(b) Pride.", "options": ["b"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:10.383289+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 24, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.85", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. The following questions each describe a situation, and ask you to choose which of five emotions is most likely to result from that situation. Here is an example: Clara receives a gift Clara is most likely to feel?  (a) happy (b) angry (c) frightened (d) bored (e) hungry. If you think Clara would feel happy, you would mark option A and then move to the next question. Select the most emotionally intelligent response by returning the one lowercase letter ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd') corresponding to that response."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Penny's hockey team trained hard and won the championship. Penny is most likely to feel? (a) Hope; (b) Pride; (c) Relief; (d) Joy; (e) Surprise"}], "sampled": ["(b) Pride"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:11.026869+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 25, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.85", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "b", "picked": null, "sampled": "(b) Pride", "options": ["b"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:11.026964+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 26, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.24", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from four responses the most effective course of action to manage both the emotions the person is feeling and the problems they face in that situation. Although more than one course of action might be acceptable, you are asked to choose what you think the most effective response for that person in that situation would be. Remember, you are not necessarily choosing what you would do, or the nicest thing to do, but choosing the most effective response for that situation. Select one or more response(s) by returning the one or more corresponding lowercase letter(s) ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd'), and, if you selected more than one, sorting them, separated by hyphen, in the order that you think best ranks them from most to least effective, within the context of the vignette provided."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Shona has not spoken to her nephew for months, whereas when he was younger they were very close. She rings him but he can only talk for five minutes. What action would be the most effective for Shona? (a) Realize that he is growing up and might not want to spend so much time with his family any more; (b) Make plans to drop by and visit him in person and have a good chat; (c) Understand that relationships change, but keep calling him from time to time; (d) Be upset about it, but realize there is nothing she can do."}], "sampled": ["(b) Make plans to drop by and visit him in person and have a good chat; (c) Understand that relationships change, but keep calling him from time to time."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:11.300192+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 27, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.24", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "c-b", "picked": null, "sampled": "(b) Make plans to drop by and visit him in person and have a good chat; (c) Understand that relationships change, but keep calling him from time to time.", "options": ["c-b"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:11.300253+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 28, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.28", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from four responses the most effective course of action to manage both the emotions the person is feeling and the problems they face in that situation. Although more than one course of action might be acceptable, you are asked to choose what you think the most effective response for that person in that situation would be. Remember, you are not necessarily choosing what you would do, or the nicest thing to do, but choosing the most effective response for that situation. Select one or more response(s) by returning the one or more corresponding lowercase letter(s) ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd'), and, if you selected more than one, sorting them, separated by hyphen, in the order that you think best ranks them from most to least effective, within the context of the vignette provided."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Mina and her sister-in-law normally get along quite well, and the sister-in-law regularly baby-sits for her for a small fee. Lately she has also been cleaning away cobwebs, commenting on the mess, which Mina finds insulting. What action would be the most effective for Mina? (a) Tell her sister-in-law these comments upset her; (b) Get a new babysitter; (c) Be grateful her house is being cleaned for free; (d) Tell her only to baby-sit, not to clean."}], "sampled": ["a-d. Mina should communicate with her sister-in-law and let her know that the comments are upsetting her. It's important to address the issue directly and respectfully. Additionally, Mina can tell her sister-in-law that she only wants her to babysit, not clean. This sets clear boundaries and expectations for their arrangement."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:13.760549+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 29, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.28", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "a-c-d", "picked": null, "sampled": "a-d. Mina should communicate with her sister-in-law and let her know that the comments are upsetting her. It's important to address the issue directly and respectfully. Additionally, Mina can tell her sister-in-law that she only wants her to babysit, not clean. This sets clear boundaries and expectations for their arrangement.", "options": ["a-c-d"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:13.760597+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 30, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.69", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. The following questions each describe a situation, and ask you to choose which of five emotions is most likely to result from that situation. Here is an example: Clara receives a gift Clara is most likely to feel?  (a) happy (b) angry (c) frightened (d) bored (e) hungry. If you think Clara would feel happy, you would mark option A and then move to the next question. Select the most emotionally intelligent response by returning the one lowercase letter ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd') corresponding to that response."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Hasad tries to use his new mobile phone. He has always been able to work out how to use different appliances, but he cannot get the phone to function. Hasad is most likely to feel? (a) Distressed; (b) Confused; (c) Surprised; (d) Relieved; (e) Frustrated"}], "sampled": ["(e) Frustrated."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:14.478268+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 31, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.69", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "e", "picked": null, "sampled": "(e) Frustrated.", "options": ["e"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:14.478300+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 32, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.74", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. The following questions each describe a situation, and ask you to choose which of five emotions is most likely to result from that situation. Here is an example: Clara receives a gift Clara is most likely to feel?  (a) happy (b) angry (c) frightened (d) bored (e) hungry. If you think Clara would feel happy, you would mark option A and then move to the next question. Select the most emotionally intelligent response by returning the one lowercase letter ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd') corresponding to that response."}, {"role": "user", "content": "It is clear that somebody will get what they want. They are most likely to feel? (a) Pride; (b) Relief; (c) Joy; (d) Hope; (e) Guilt"}], "sampled": ["(b) Relief."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:15.134865+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 33, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.74", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "c", "picked": null, "sampled": "(b) Relief.", "options": ["c"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:15.134908+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 34, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.9", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from four responses the most effective course of action to manage both the emotions the person is feeling and the problems they face in that situation. Although more than one course of action might be acceptable, you are asked to choose what you think the most effective response for that person in that situation would be. Remember, you are not necessarily choosing what you would do, or the nicest thing to do, but choosing the most effective response for that situation. Select one or more response(s) by returning the one or more corresponding lowercase letter(s) ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd'), and, if you selected more than one, sorting them, separated by hyphen, in the order that you think best ranks them from most to least effective, within the context of the vignette provided."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Darla is nervous about presenting her work to a group of seniors who might not understand it, as they don't know much about her area. What action would be the most effective for Darla? (a) Be positive and confident, knowing it will go well; (b) Just give the presentation; (c) Work on her presentation, simplifying the explanations; (d) Practice presenting to laypeople such as friends or family."}], "sampled": ["c-d. The most effective course of action for Darla would be to work on her presentation, simplifying the explanations, as this would help her to communicate her work more effectively to the seniors. Additionally, practicing presenting to laypeople such as friends or family would help her gain confidence and improve her presentation skills. While being positive and confident is important, it may not be enough to address the specific concerns Darla has about the seniors not understanding her work. Just giving the presentation without making any changes to address the seniors' potential lack of understanding may not be effective in achieving Darla's goals."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:15.456006+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 35, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.9", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "c-d", "picked": "c-d", "sampled": "c-d. The most effective course of action for Darla would be to work on her presentation, simplifying the explanations, as this would help her to communicate her work more effectively to the seniors. Additionally, practicing presenting to laypeople such as friends or family would help her gain confidence and improve her presentation skills. While being positive and confident is important, it may not be enough to address the specific concerns Darla has about the seniors not understanding her work. Just giving the presentation without making any changes to address the seniors' potential lack of understanding may not be effective in achieving Darla's goals.", "options": ["c-d"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:15.456047+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 36, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.54", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. The following questions each describe a situation, and ask you to choose which of five emotions is most likely to result from that situation. Here is an example: Clara receives a gift Clara is most likely to feel?  (a) happy (b) angry (c) frightened (d) bored (e) hungry. If you think Clara would feel happy, you would mark option A and then move to the next question. Select the most emotionally intelligent response by returning the one lowercase letter ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd') corresponding to that response."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Leya works as a trouble-shooter. She is presented with a standard looking problem but cannot work out how to solve it. Leya is most likely to feel? (a) Confused; (b) Frustrated; (c) Surprised; (d) Relieved; (e) Distressed"}], "sampled": ["(a) Confused."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:15.954167+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 37, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.54", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "b", "picked": null, "sampled": "(a) Confused.", "options": ["b"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:15.954204+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 38, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.1", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from four responses the most effective course of action to manage both the emotions the person is feeling and the problems they face in that situation. Although more than one course of action might be acceptable, you are asked to choose what you think the most effective response for that person in that situation would be. Remember, you are not necessarily choosing what you would do, or the nicest thing to do, but choosing the most effective response for that situation. Select one or more response(s) by returning the one or more corresponding lowercase letter(s) ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd'), and, if you selected more than one, sorting them, separated by hyphen, in the order that you think best ranks them from most to least effective, within the context of the vignette provided."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Rhea has left her job to be a full-time mother, which she loves, but she misses the company and companionship of her workmates. What action would be the most effective for Rhea? (a) Enjoy being a full-time mom; (b) Try to see her old workmates socially, inviting them out; (c) Join a playgroup or social group of new mothers; (d) See if she can find part time work."}], "sampled": ["Ranking: c > b > a > d\n\nExplanation: While enjoying being a full-time mom is important, Rhea is experiencing a specific problem of missing the company and companionship of her workmates. Therefore, it would be most effective for her to join a playgroup or social group of new mothers to meet new people who are in a similar situation. Trying to see her old workmates socially is also a good option, but it may not be possible if they are busy with work. Enjoying being a full-time mom is important, but it does not address the specific problem Rhea is facing. Seeing if she can find part-time work may not be the best option if she wants to continue being a full-time mom."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:16.474311+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 39, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.1", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "c-b-d", "picked": null, "sampled": "Ranking: c > b > a > d\n\nExplanation: While enjoying being a full-time mom is important, Rhea is experiencing a specific problem of missing the company and companionship of her workmates. Therefore, it would be most effective for her to join a playgroup or social group of new mothers to meet new people who are in a similar situation. Trying to see her old workmates socially is also a good option, but it may not be possible if they are busy with work. Enjoying being a full-time mom is important, but it does not address the specific problem Rhea is facing. Seeing if she can find part-time work may not be the best option if she wants to continue being a full-time mom.", "options": ["c-b-d"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:16.474425+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 40, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.7", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from four responses the most effective course of action to manage both the emotions the person is feeling and the problems they face in that situation. Although more than one course of action might be acceptable, you are asked to choose what you think the most effective response for that person in that situation would be. Remember, you are not necessarily choosing what you would do, or the nicest thing to do, but choosing the most effective response for that situation. Select one or more response(s) by returning the one or more corresponding lowercase letter(s) ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd'), and, if you selected more than one, sorting them, separated by hyphen, in the order that you think best ranks them from most to least effective, within the context of the vignette provided."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Alan helps Trudy, a peer he works with occasionally, with a difficult task. Trudy complains that Alan's work isn't very good, and Alan responds that Trudy should be grateful he is doing her a favor. They argue. What action would be the most effective for Alan? (a) Stop helping Trudy and don't help her again; (b) Try harder to help appropriately; (c) Apologize to Trudy; (d) Diffuse the argument by asking for advice."}], "sampled": ["Option (b) Try harder to help appropriately would be the most effective for Alan. Alan should try to understand Trudy's concerns and work on improving his work to meet her expectations. This will not only help diffuse the argument but also improve their working relationship. Option (a) Stop helping Trudy and don't help her again would not be effective as it would not address the underlying issue and may harm their working relationship. Option (c) Apologize to Trudy may be effective if Alan's work was indeed subpar, but it may not address the root cause of the argument. Option (d) Diffuse the argument by asking for advice may not be effective as it may not address the underlying issue and may come across as insincere."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:16.536394+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 41, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.7", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "d-a-b-c", "picked": null, "sampled": "Option (b) Try harder to help appropriately would be the most effective for Alan. Alan should try to understand Trudy's concerns and work on improving his work to meet her expectations. This will not only help diffuse the argument but also improve their working relationship. Option (a) Stop helping Trudy and don't help her again would not be effective as it would not address the underlying issue and may harm their working relationship. Option (c) Apologize to Trudy may be effective if Alan's work was indeed subpar, but it may not address the root cause of the argument. Option (d) Diffuse the argument by asking for advice may not be effective as it may not address the underlying issue and may come across as insincere.", "options": ["d-a-b-c"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:16.536432+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 42, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.46", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. The following questions each describe a situation, and ask you to choose which of five emotions is most likely to result from that situation. Here is an example: Clara receives a gift Clara is most likely to feel?  (a) happy (b) angry (c) frightened (d) bored (e) hungry. If you think Clara would feel happy, you would mark option A and then move to the next question. Select the most emotionally intelligent response by returning the one lowercase letter ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd') corresponding to that response."}, {"role": "user", "content": "An irritating neighbor of Eve's moves to another state. Eve is most likely to feel? (a) Regret; (b) Hope; (c) Relief; (d) Sadness; (e) Joy"}], "sampled": ["(c) Relief."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:16.595670+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 43, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.46", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "c", "picked": null, "sampled": "(c) Relief.", "options": ["c"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:16.595711+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 44, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.3", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from four responses the most effective course of action to manage both the emotions the person is feeling and the problems they face in that situation. Although more than one course of action might be acceptable, you are asked to choose what you think the most effective response for that person in that situation would be. Remember, you are not necessarily choosing what you would do, or the nicest thing to do, but choosing the most effective response for that situation. Select one or more response(s) by returning the one or more corresponding lowercase letter(s) ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd'), and, if you selected more than one, sorting them, separated by hyphen, in the order that you think best ranks them from most to least effective, within the context of the vignette provided."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Mario is showing Min, a new employee, how the system works. Mario's boss walks by and announces Mario is wrong about several points, as changes have been made. Mario gets on well with his boss, although they don't normally have much to do with each other. What action would be the most effective for Mario? (a) Make a joke to Min, explaining he didn't know about the changes; (b) Not worry about it, just ignore the interruption; (c) Learn the new changes; (d) Tell the boss that such criticism was inappropriate."}], "sampled": ["Response: (c) Learn the new changes. \n\nExplanation: In this situation, the most effective course of action for Mario would be to learn the new changes. This would help him to correct any mistakes he made while showing Min how the system works. Ignoring the interruption (b) or making a joke (a) might not be the best course of action, as it could make Mario appear unprofessional or uninterested in his job. While telling the boss that such criticism was inappropriate (d) might be tempting, it could damage Mario's relationship with his boss and create unnecessary conflict. Therefore, the best course of action for Mario would be to learn the new changes and correct any mistakes he made while showing Min how the system works."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:16.627705+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 45, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.3", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "a-d-c", "picked": null, "sampled": "Response: (c) Learn the new changes. \n\nExplanation: In this situation, the most effective course of action for Mario would be to learn the new changes. This would help him to correct any mistakes he made while showing Min how the system works. Ignoring the interruption (b) or making a joke (a) might not be the best course of action, as it could make Mario appear unprofessional or uninterested in his job. While telling the boss that such criticism was inappropriate (d) might be tempting, it could damage Mario's relationship with his boss and create unnecessary conflict. Therefore, the best course of action for Mario would be to learn the new changes and correct any mistakes he made while showing Min how the system works.", "options": ["a-d-c"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:16.627740+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 46, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.35", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from four responses the most effective course of action to manage both the emotions the person is feeling and the problems they face in that situation. Although more than one course of action might be acceptable, you are asked to choose what you think the most effective response for that person in that situation would be. Remember, you are not necessarily choosing what you would do, or the nicest thing to do, but choosing the most effective response for that situation. Select one or more response(s) by returning the one or more corresponding lowercase letter(s) ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd'), and, if you selected more than one, sorting them, separated by hyphen, in the order that you think best ranks them from most to least effective, within the context of the vignette provided."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Michelle's friend Dara is moving overseas to live with her partner. They have been good friends for many years and Dara is unlikely to come back. What action would be the most effective for Michelle? (a) Forget about Dara; (b) Spend time with other friends, keeping herself busy; (c) Think that Dara and her partner will return soon; (d) Make sure she keeps in contact through email, phone or letter writing."}], "sampled": ["d"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:17.101284+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 47, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.35", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "d-b", "picked": null, "sampled": "d", "options": ["d-b"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:17.101316+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 48, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.12", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from four responses the most effective course of action to manage both the emotions the person is feeling and the problems they face in that situation. Although more than one course of action might be acceptable, you are asked to choose what you think the most effective response for that person in that situation would be. Remember, you are not necessarily choosing what you would do, or the nicest thing to do, but choosing the most effective response for that situation. Select one or more response(s) by returning the one or more corresponding lowercase letter(s) ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd'), and, if you selected more than one, sorting them, separated by hyphen, in the order that you think best ranks them from most to least effective, within the context of the vignette provided."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Clayton has been overseas for a long time and returns to visit his family. So much has changed that Clayton feels left out. What action would be the most effective for Clayton? (a) Nothing 3 it will sort itself out soon enough; (b) Tell his family he feels left out; (c) Spend time listening and getting involved again; (d) Reflect that relationships can change with time."}], "sampled": ["Response (c) Spend time listening and getting involved again would be the most effective for Clayton. It would help him reconnect with his family and feel less left out. Response (b) Tell his family he feels left out could also be effective, but it might come across as confrontational and cause tension. Response (d) Reflect that relationships can change with time might be helpful for Clayton to understand the situation, but it doesn't address the problem directly. Response (a) Nothing - it will sort itself out soon enough is not an effective response as it ignores the problem and doesn't offer any solution. Therefore, the ranking would be: (c) > (b) > (d) > (a)."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:17.277810+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 49, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.12", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "c-b-d", "picked": null, "sampled": "Response (c) Spend time listening and getting involved again would be the most effective for Clayton. It would help him reconnect with his family and feel less left out. Response (b) Tell his family he feels left out could also be effective, but it might come across as confrontational and cause tension. Response (d) Reflect that relationships can change with time might be helpful for Clayton to understand the situation, but it doesn't address the problem directly. Response (a) Nothing - it will sort itself out soon enough is not an effective response as it ignores the problem and doesn't offer any solution. Therefore, the ranking would be: (c) > (b) > (d) > (a).", "options": ["c-b-d"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:17.277849+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 50, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.83", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. The following questions each describe a situation, and ask you to choose which of five emotions is most likely to result from that situation. Here is an example: Clara receives a gift Clara is most likely to feel?  (a) happy (b) angry (c) frightened (d) bored (e) hungry. If you think Clara would feel happy, you would mark option A and then move to the next question. Select the most emotionally intelligent response by returning the one lowercase letter ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd') corresponding to that response."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Pete gets home late, after his favorite TV show has ended. Pete's partner has taped the show for him. Pete is most likely to feel? (a) Surprise; (b) Hope; (c) Pride; (d) Relief; (e) Gratitude"}], "sampled": ["(e) Gratitude"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:17.326200+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 51, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.83", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "c-e", "picked": null, "sampled": "(e) Gratitude", "options": ["c-e"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:17.326241+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 52, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.22", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from four responses the most effective course of action to manage both the emotions the person is feeling and the problems they face in that situation. Although more than one course of action might be acceptable, you are asked to choose what you think the most effective response for that person in that situation would be. Remember, you are not necessarily choosing what you would do, or the nicest thing to do, but choosing the most effective response for that situation. Select one or more response(s) by returning the one or more corresponding lowercase letter(s) ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd'), and, if you selected more than one, sorting them, separated by hyphen, in the order that you think best ranks them from most to least effective, within the context of the vignette provided."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Greg has just gone back to university after a lapse of several years. He is surrounded by younger students who seem very confident about their ability and he is unsure whether he can compete with them. What action would be the most effective for Greg? (a) Focus on his life outside the university; (b) Study hard and attend all lectures; (c) Talk to others in his situation; (d) Realize he is better than the younger students as he has more life experience."}], "sampled": ["Ranking: b-c-a-d\n\nExplanation: \n(a) Focusing on his life outside the university may provide temporary relief, but it does not address the underlying issue of Greg's lack of confidence in his ability to compete with younger students. \n(b) Studying hard and attending all lectures is a proactive approach that can help Greg improve his academic performance and build his confidence. \n(c) Talking to others in his situation can help Greg realize that he is not alone in feeling unsure and can provide him with support and strategies for coping with his situation. \n(d) Realizing he is better than the younger students as he has more life experience may provide a temporary boost to Greg's confidence, but it is not a sustainable solution and may lead to overconfidence or complacency."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:17.618674+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 53, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.22", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "c-b", "picked": null, "sampled": "Ranking: b-c-a-d\n\nExplanation: \n(a) Focusing on his life outside the university may provide temporary relief, but it does not address the underlying issue of Greg's lack of confidence in his ability to compete with younger students. \n(b) Studying hard and attending all lectures is a proactive approach that can help Greg improve his academic performance and build his confidence. \n(c) Talking to others in his situation can help Greg realize that he is not alone in feeling unsure and can provide him with support and strategies for coping with his situation. \n(d) Realizing he is better than the younger students as he has more life experience may provide a temporary boost to Greg's confidence, but it is not a sustainable solution and may lead to overconfidence or complacency.", "options": ["c-b"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:17.618705+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 54, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.82", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. The following questions each describe a situation, and ask you to choose which of five emotions is most likely to result from that situation. Here is an example: Clara receives a gift Clara is most likely to feel?  (a) happy (b) angry (c) frightened (d) bored (e) hungry. If you think Clara would feel happy, you would mark option A and then move to the next question. Select the most emotionally intelligent response by returning the one lowercase letter ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd') corresponding to that response."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Someone believes that another person has caused harm to them, due to that person's bad character. They think they can probably handle the situation though. The harmed person is most likely to feel? (a) Contempt; (b) Anger; (c) Horror; (d) Excitement; (e) Shame"}], "sampled": ["(b) Anger."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:17.795138+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 55, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.82", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "a", "picked": null, "sampled": "(b) Anger.", "options": ["a"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:17.795230+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 56, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.91", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from among four responses what you would be most likely to do in the situation. Please note, there are no right or wrong answers. We all deal with situations in different ways. All that you need to do is answer each question honestly. Select one or more response(s) by returning the one or more corresponding lowercase letter(s) ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd'), and, if you selected more than one, sorting them, separated by hyphen, in the order that you think best ranks them from most to least effective, within the context of the vignette provided."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You move to a new community away from all your friends. You find that your friends make less of an effort to keep in contact with you than you thought they would. What would you do in this situation? (a) Make the effort to contact them, but also meet people in your new community; (b) Get involved in community events like sports or fund-raisers; (c) Let go of your old friends, who seem to be losers; (d) Try to tell your old friends how you feel"}], "sampled": ["a) Make the effort to contact them, but also meet people in your new community."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:18.243635+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 57, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.91", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "a-b-d-c", "picked": null, "sampled": "a) Make the effort to contact them, but also meet people in your new community.", "options": ["a-b-d-c"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:18.243670+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 58, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.47", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. The following questions each describe a situation, and ask you to choose which of five emotions is most likely to result from that situation. Here is an example: Clara receives a gift Clara is most likely to feel?  (a) happy (b) angry (c) frightened (d) bored (e) hungry. If you think Clara would feel happy, you would mark option A and then move to the next question. Select the most emotionally intelligent response by returning the one lowercase letter ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd') corresponding to that response."}, {"role": "user", "content": "There is great weather on the day Jill is going on an out-door picnic. Jill is most likely to feel? (a) Pride; (b) Joy; (c) Relief; (d) Guilt; (e) Hope"}], "sampled": ["(b) Joy"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:18.255661+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 59, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.47", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "b", "picked": null, "sampled": "(b) Joy", "options": ["b"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:18.255704+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 60, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.81", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. The following questions each describe a situation, and ask you to choose which of five emotions is most likely to result from that situation. Here is an example: Clara receives a gift Clara is most likely to feel?  (a) happy (b) angry (c) frightened (d) bored (e) hungry. If you think Clara would feel happy, you would mark option A and then move to the next question. Select the most emotionally intelligent response by returning the one lowercase letter ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd') corresponding to that response."}, {"role": "user", "content": "The new manager at Enid's work changes everyone's hours to a less flexible work pattern, leaving no room for discussion. Enid is most likely to feel? (a) Dislike; (b) Rage; (c) Jealousy; (d) Surprise; (e) Anxiety"}], "sampled": ["(a) Dislike"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:18.447586+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 61, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.81", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "a", "picked": null, "sampled": "(a) Dislike", "options": ["a"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:18.447620+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 62, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.96", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from among four responses what you would be most likely to do in the situation. Please note, there are no right or wrong answers. We all deal with situations in different ways. All that you need to do is answer each question honestly. Select one or more response(s) by returning the one or more corresponding lowercase letter(s) ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd'), and, if you selected more than one, sorting them, separated by hyphen, in the order that you think best ranks them from most to least effective, within the context of the vignette provided."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are very excited about starting a new club. Then a family member remarks that the club will probably only last six weeks. What would you do in this situation? (a) Ignore the family member's comments; (b) Prove your family member wrong but doing everything you can to have fun and succeed at the new club; (c) Discuss with the family member how this club might be different than past clubs you were involved in; (d) Tell your family member he/she is wrong"}], "sampled": ["I would choose response (c) and (b) in that order. \n\n(c) Discuss with the family member how this club might be different than past clubs you were involved in: This response shows emotional intelligence by acknowledging the family member's concerns and engaging in a conversation to address them. It also allows for an opportunity to share your excitement and plans for the club, potentially changing their perspective.\n\n(b) Prove your family member wrong but doing everything you can to have fun and succeed at the new club: This response shows resilience and determination to succeed despite the negative comment. It can also serve as a way to prove to the family member that their comment was unfounded."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:18.545545+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 63, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.96", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "c-b-a-d", "picked": null, "sampled": "I would choose response (c) and (b) in that order. \n\n(c) Discuss with the family member how this club might be different than past clubs you were involved in: This response shows emotional intelligence by acknowledging the family member's concerns and engaging in a conversation to address them. It also allows for an opportunity to share your excitement and plans for the club, potentially changing their perspective.\n\n(b) Prove your family member wrong but doing everything you can to have fun and succeed at the new club: This response shows resilience and determination to succeed despite the negative comment. It can also serve as a way to prove to the family member that their comment was unfounded.", "options": ["c-b-a-d"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:18.545576+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 64, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.10", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from four responses the most effective course of action to manage both the emotions the person is feeling and the problems they face in that situation. Although more than one course of action might be acceptable, you are asked to choose what you think the most effective response for that person in that situation would be. Remember, you are not necessarily choosing what you would do, or the nicest thing to do, but choosing the most effective response for that situation. Select one or more response(s) by returning the one or more corresponding lowercase letter(s) ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd'), and, if you selected more than one, sorting them, separated by hyphen, in the order that you think best ranks them from most to least effective, within the context of the vignette provided."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Andre moves away from the city his friends and family are in. He finds his friends make less effort to keep in contact than he thought they would. What action would be the most effective for Andre? (a) Try to adjust to life in the new city by joining clubs and activities there; (b) He should make the effort to contact them, but also try to meet people in his new city; (c) Let go of his old friends, who have shown themselves to be unreliable; (d) Tell his friends he is disappointed in them for not contacting him."}], "sampled": ["b - He should make the effort to contact them, but also try to meet people in his new city. \n\na - Try to adjust to life in the new city by joining clubs and activities there could also be effective, as it would help Andre to build a new social network and feel more connected to his new city. \n\nc - Let go of his old friends, who have shown themselves to be unreliable, might be a bit extreme, as it is possible that his friends are simply busy or have their own things going on. \n\nd - Tell his friends he is disappointed in them for not contacting him is not the most effective response, as it could come across as confrontational and might damage the relationship further."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:18.812387+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 65, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.10", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "b", "picked": "b", "sampled": "b - He should make the effort to contact them, but also try to meet people in his new city. \n\na - Try to adjust to life in the new city by joining clubs and activities there could also be effective, as it would help Andre to build a new social network and feel more connected to his new city. \n\nc - Let go of his old friends, who have shown themselves to be unreliable, might be a bit extreme, as it is possible that his friends are simply busy or have their own things going on. \n\nd - Tell his friends he is disappointed in them for not contacting him is not the most effective response, as it could come across as confrontational and might damage the relationship further.", "options": ["b"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:18.812417+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 66, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.56", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. The following questions each describe a situation, and ask you to choose which of five emotions is most likely to result from that situation. Here is an example: Clara receives a gift Clara is most likely to feel?  (a) happy (b) angry (c) frightened (d) bored (e) hungry. If you think Clara would feel happy, you would mark option A and then move to the next question. Select the most emotionally intelligent response by returning the one lowercase letter ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd') corresponding to that response."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Rashid needs to meet a quota before his performance review. There is only a small change that he will be able to do so and there isn't much he can do to improve the outcome. Rashid is most likely to feel? (a) Irritated; (b) Scared; (c) Distressed; (d) Sad; (e) Hopeful"}], "sampled": ["(d) Sad"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:18.981196+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 67, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.56", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "b", "picked": null, "sampled": "(d) Sad", "options": ["b"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:18.981227+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 68, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.95", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from among four responses what you would be most likely to do in the situation. Please note, there are no right or wrong answers. We all deal with situations in different ways. All that you need to do is answer each question honestly. Select one or more response(s) by returning the one or more corresponding lowercase letter(s) ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd'), and, if you selected more than one, sorting them, separated by hyphen, in the order that you think best ranks them from most to least effective, within the context of the vignette provided."}, {"role": "user", "content": "After school, you usually go to the mall with a really good friend. When your friend's family moves to a different part of town, your friend stops coming to the mall. You miss these times. What would you do in this situation? (a) Get your friend to meet you at the mall even if it's not convenient for her; (b) Go to the mall and hang out with other people; (c) Suggest other activities you and your friend could do together even if they occur less often; (d) Never talk to your friend again"}], "sampled": ["(c) Suggest other activities you and your friend could do together even if they occur less often; (b) Go to the mall and hang out with other people."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:20.481941+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 69, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.95", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "d-b-a-c", "picked": null, "sampled": "(c) Suggest other activities you and your friend could do together even if they occur less often; (b) Go to the mall and hang out with other people.", "options": ["d-b-a-c"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:20.481989+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 70, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.73", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. The following questions each describe a situation, and ask you to choose which of five emotions is most likely to result from that situation. Here is an example: Clara receives a gift Clara is most likely to feel?  (a) happy (b) angry (c) frightened (d) bored (e) hungry. If you think Clara would feel happy, you would mark option A and then move to the next question. Select the most emotionally intelligent response by returning the one lowercase letter ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd') corresponding to that response."}, {"role": "user", "content": "An upcoming event might have bad consequences. Nothing much can be done to alter this. The person involved would be most likely to feel? (a) Sad; (b) Irritated; (c) Distressed; (d) Scared; (e) Hopeful"}], "sampled": ["(d) Scared."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:21.261603+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 71, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.73", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "d", "picked": null, "sampled": "(d) Scared.", "options": ["d"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:21.261635+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 72, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.80", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. The following questions each describe a situation, and ask you to choose which of five emotions is most likely to result from that situation. Here is an example: Clara receives a gift Clara is most likely to feel?  (a) happy (b) angry (c) frightened (d) bored (e) hungry. If you think Clara would feel happy, you would mark option A and then move to the next question. Select the most emotionally intelligent response by returning the one lowercase letter ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd') corresponding to that response."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Someone believes another person has deliberately caused something good to stop happening to them. However, they feel they can do something about it. They are most likely to feel? (a) Angry; (b) Contemptuous; (c) Distress; (d) Depressed; (e) Frustrated"}], "sampled": ["(a) Angry"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:21.916128+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 73, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.80", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "a", "picked": null, "sampled": "(a) Angry", "options": ["a"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:21.916163+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 74, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.32", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from four responses the most effective course of action to manage both the emotions the person is feeling and the problems they face in that situation. Although more than one course of action might be acceptable, you are asked to choose what you think the most effective response for that person in that situation would be. Remember, you are not necessarily choosing what you would do, or the nicest thing to do, but choosing the most effective response for that situation. Select one or more response(s) by returning the one or more corresponding lowercase letter(s) ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd'), and, if you selected more than one, sorting them, separated by hyphen, in the order that you think best ranks them from most to least effective, within the context of the vignette provided."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A demanding client takes up a lot of Jill's time and then asks to speak to Jill's boss about her performance. Although Jill's boss assures her that her performance is fine, Jill feels upset. What action would be the most effective for Jill? (a) Talk to her friends or workmates about it; (b) Ignore the incident and move on to her next task; (c) Calm down by taking deep breaths or going for a short walk; (d) Think that she has been successful in the past and this client being difficult is not her fault."}], "sampled": ["c-d. Calming down by taking deep breaths or going for a short walk can help Jill manage her emotions and reduce her stress levels. Thinking that she has been successful in the past and this client being difficult is not her fault can help her maintain a positive self-image and not take the criticism personally."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:22.214885+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 75, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.32", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "d-c", "picked": null, "sampled": "c-d. Calming down by taking deep breaths or going for a short walk can help Jill manage her emotions and reduce her stress levels. Thinking that she has been successful in the past and this client being difficult is not her fault can help her maintain a positive self-image and not take the criticism personally.", "options": ["d-c"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:22.214918+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 76, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.58", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. The following questions each describe a situation, and ask you to choose which of five emotions is most likely to result from that situation. Here is an example: Clara receives a gift Clara is most likely to feel?  (a) happy (b) angry (c) frightened (d) bored (e) hungry. If you think Clara would feel happy, you would mark option A and then move to the next question. Select the most emotionally intelligent response by returning the one lowercase letter ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd') corresponding to that response."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Phil's workmate Bart asks Phil to lie for him about money Bart has been stealing from the company. Phil does not agree. Phil is most likely to feel? (a) Excitement; (b) Anger; (c) Horror; (d) Contempt; (e) Shame"}], "sampled": ["(b) Anger"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:22.818426+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 77, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.58", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "d", "picked": null, "sampled": "(b) Anger", "options": ["d"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:22.818460+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 78, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.62", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. The following questions each describe a situation, and ask you to choose which of five emotions is most likely to result from that situation. Here is an example: Clara receives a gift Clara is most likely to feel?  (a) happy (b) angry (c) frightened (d) bored (e) hungry. If you think Clara would feel happy, you would mark option A and then move to the next question. Select the most emotionally intelligent response by returning the one lowercase letter ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd') corresponding to that response."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Megan is looking to buy a house. Something happened and she felt regret. What is most likely to have happened? (a) She didn't make an offer on a house she wanted, and now she is trying to find out if it is too late; (b) She found a house she liked that she didn't think she would find; (c) She couldn't make an offer on a house she liked because the bank didn't get her the money in time; (d) She didn't make an offer on a house she liked and now someone else has bought it; (e) She made an offer on a house and is waiting to see if it is accepted."}], "sampled": ["(d) She didn't make an offer on a house she liked and now someone else has bought it."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:23.445647+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 79, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.62", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "d", "picked": null, "sampled": "(d) She didn't make an offer on a house she liked and now someone else has bought it.", "options": ["d"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:23.445683+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 80, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.72", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. The following questions each describe a situation, and ask you to choose which of five emotions is most likely to result from that situation. Here is an example: Clara receives a gift Clara is most likely to feel?  (a) happy (b) angry (c) frightened (d) bored (e) hungry. If you think Clara would feel happy, you would mark option A and then move to the next question. Select the most emotionally intelligent response by returning the one lowercase letter ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd') corresponding to that response."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Quan and his wife are talking about what happened to them that day. Something happened that caused Quan to feel surprised. What is most likely to have happened? (a) His wife talked a lot, which did not usually happen; (b) His wife talked about things that were different to what they usually discussed; (c) His wife told him that she might have some bad news; (d) His wife told Quan some news that was not what he thought it would be; (e) His wife told a funny story."}], "sampled": ["(d) His wife told Quan some news that was not what he thought it would be."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:24.320708+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 81, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.72", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "d", "picked": null, "sampled": "(d) His wife told Quan some news that was not what he thought it would be.", "options": ["d"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:24.320775+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 82, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.14", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from four responses the most effective course of action to manage both the emotions the person is feeling and the problems they face in that situation. Although more than one course of action might be acceptable, you are asked to choose what you think the most effective response for that person in that situation would be. Remember, you are not necessarily choosing what you would do, or the nicest thing to do, but choosing the most effective response for that situation. Select one or more response(s) by returning the one or more corresponding lowercase letter(s) ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd'), and, if you selected more than one, sorting them, separated by hyphen, in the order that you think best ranks them from most to least effective, within the context of the vignette provided."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Benjiro's parents are in their late 80s and living interstate in a house by themselves. He is worried that they need some help but they angrily deny it any time he brings up the subject. What action would be the most effective for Benjiro? (a) Visit frequently and get others to check on them; (b) Believe his parents' claims that they are fine; (c) Keep telling his parents his concerns, stressing their importance; (d) Force his parents to move into a home."}], "sampled": ["The most effective course of action for Benjiro would be:\n\n(a) Visit frequently and get others to check on them.\n\nThis way, Benjiro can keep an eye on his parents and ensure that they are safe and healthy. Additionally, by involving others, he can get a second opinion on their well-being and make sure that they are receiving the care they need. It is important to respect his parents' wishes, but also to ensure their safety. \n\n(c) Keep telling his parents his concerns, stressing their importance.\n\nWhile it is important to respect his parents' wishes, it is also important to communicate his concerns to them. By stressing the importance of their well-being, he may be able to convince them to accept help. However, this should be done in a respectful and non-confrontational manner. \n\n(b) Believe his parents' claims that they are fine.\n\nWhile it is important to respect his parents' wishes, it is also important to ensure their safety. Simply believing their claims that they are fine may not be the most effective course of action. \n\n(d) Force his parents to move into a home.\n\nForcing his parents to move into a home would likely cause unnecessary stress and strain on their relationship. It is important to respect their wishes and autonomy as much as possible."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:24.527227+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 83, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.14", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "a-b-c", "picked": null, "sampled": "The most effective course of action for Benjiro would be:\n\n(a) Visit frequently and get others to check on them.\n\nThis way, Benjiro can keep an eye on his parents and ensure that they are safe and healthy. Additionally, by involving others, he can get a second opinion on their well-being and make sure that they are receiving the care they need. It is important to respect his parents' wishes, but also to ensure their safety. \n\n(c) Keep telling his parents his concerns, stressing their importance.\n\nWhile it is important to respect his parents' wishes, it is also important to communicate his concerns to them. By stressing the importance of their well-being, he may be able to convince them to accept help. However, this should be done in a respectful and non-confrontational manner. \n\n(b) Believe his parents' claims that they are fine.\n\nWhile it is important to respect his parents' wishes, it is also important to ensure their safety. Simply believing their claims that they are fine may not be the most effective course of action. \n\n(d) Force his parents to move into a home.\n\nForcing his parents to move into a home would likely cause unnecessary stress and strain on their relationship. It is important to respect their wishes and autonomy as much as possible.", "options": ["a-b-c"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:24.527291+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 84, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.70", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. The following questions each describe a situation, and ask you to choose which of five emotions is most likely to result from that situation. Here is an example: Clara receives a gift Clara is most likely to feel?  (a) happy (b) angry (c) frightened (d) bored (e) hungry. If you think Clara would feel happy, you would mark option A and then move to the next question. Select the most emotionally intelligent response by returning the one lowercase letter ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd') corresponding to that response."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Dorian's friend is ill and coughs all over him without bothering to turn away or cover his mouth. Dorian is most likely to feel? (a) Anxiety; (b) Dislike; (c) Surprise; (d) Jealousy; (e) Rage"}], "sampled": ["(b) Dislike."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:24.984512+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 85, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.70", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "b", "picked": null, "sampled": "(b) Dislike.", "options": ["b"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:24.984545+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 86, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.59", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. The following questions each describe a situation, and ask you to choose which of five emotions is most likely to result from that situation. Here is an example: Clara receives a gift Clara is most likely to feel?  (a) happy (b) angry (c) frightened (d) bored (e) hungry. If you think Clara would feel happy, you would mark option A and then move to the next question. Select the most emotionally intelligent response by returning the one lowercase letter ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd') corresponding to that response."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Jim enjoys spending Saturdays playing with his children in the park. This year they have sporting activities on Saturdays and cannot go to the park with him any more. Jim is most likely to feel? (a) Angry; (b) Sad; (c) Frustrated; (d) Distressed; (e) Ashamed"}], "sampled": ["(b) Sad"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:25.156638+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 87, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.59", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "b", "picked": null, "sampled": "(b) Sad", "options": ["b"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:25.156672+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 88, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.39", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from four responses the most effective course of action to manage both the emotions the person is feeling and the problems they face in that situation. Although more than one course of action might be acceptable, you are asked to choose what you think the most effective response for that person in that situation would be. Remember, you are not necessarily choosing what you would do, or the nicest thing to do, but choosing the most effective response for that situation. Select one or more response(s) by returning the one or more corresponding lowercase letter(s) ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd'), and, if you selected more than one, sorting them, separated by hyphen, in the order that you think best ranks them from most to least effective, within the context of the vignette provided."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Alana has been acting in a high-ranking role for several months. A decision is made that only long-term employees can now act in these roles, and Alana has not been with the company long enough to do so. What action would be the most effective for Alana? (a) Quit that position; (b) Use that experience to get promoted when she is long term; (c) Accept this new rule, but feel hard-done-by; (d) Ask management if an exception can be made."}], "sampled": ["Option (b) would be the most effective course of action for Alana. She can use the experience she has gained in the high-ranking role to her advantage when she becomes eligible for the position. Option (d) could also be effective if Alana approaches management in a professional and respectful manner, explaining her situation and asking if an exception can be made. However, it is important to note that the decision ultimately lies with management and there is no guarantee that an exception will be made. Therefore, the most effective course of action would be to use the experience gained to her advantage in the future. The other options, quitting the position or accepting the new rule but feeling hard-done-by, would not be as effective in helping Alana achieve her career goals."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:25.231415+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 89, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.39", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "b-d-a", "picked": null, "sampled": "Option (b) would be the most effective course of action for Alana. She can use the experience she has gained in the high-ranking role to her advantage when she becomes eligible for the position. Option (d) could also be effective if Alana approaches management in a professional and respectful manner, explaining her situation and asking if an exception can be made. However, it is important to note that the decision ultimately lies with management and there is no guarantee that an exception will be made. Therefore, the most effective course of action would be to use the experience gained to her advantage in the future. The other options, quitting the position or accepting the new rule but feeling hard-done-by, would not be as effective in helping Alana achieve her career goals.", "options": ["b-d-a"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:25.231447+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 90, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.26", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from four responses the most effective course of action to manage both the emotions the person is feeling and the problems they face in that situation. Although more than one course of action might be acceptable, you are asked to choose what you think the most effective response for that person in that situation would be. Remember, you are not necessarily choosing what you would do, or the nicest thing to do, but choosing the most effective response for that situation. Select one or more response(s) by returning the one or more corresponding lowercase letter(s) ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd'), and, if you selected more than one, sorting them, separated by hyphen, in the order that you think best ranks them from most to least effective, within the context of the vignette provided."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Joel has always dealt with one particular client but on a very complex job his boss gives the task to a co-worker instead. Joel wonders whether his boss thinks he can't handle the important jobs. What action would be the most effective for Joel? (a) Believe he is performing well and will be given the next complex job; (b) Do good work so that he will be given the complex tasks in future; (c) Ask his boss why the co-worker was given the job; (d) Not worry about this unless it happens again."}], "sampled": ["Response: (b) Do good work so that he will be given the complex tasks in future.\n\nExplanation: Joel should focus on doing good work and proving his capability to his boss. This will increase his chances of being given complex tasks in the future. It is important for Joel to not jump to conclusions and assume that his boss thinks he can't handle important jobs. Asking his boss why the co-worker was given the job might come across as defensive and could potentially damage his relationship with his boss. Not worrying about it unless it happens again might cause Joel to miss out on opportunities to prove himself. Therefore, doing good work is the most effective response for Joel in this situation."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:25.314024+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 91, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.26", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "c-b-d", "picked": null, "sampled": "Response: (b) Do good work so that he will be given the complex tasks in future.\n\nExplanation: Joel should focus on doing good work and proving his capability to his boss. This will increase his chances of being given complex tasks in the future. It is important for Joel to not jump to conclusions and assume that his boss thinks he can't handle important jobs. Asking his boss why the co-worker was given the job might come across as defensive and could potentially damage his relationship with his boss. Not worrying about it unless it happens again might cause Joel to miss out on opportunities to prove himself. Therefore, doing good work is the most effective response for Joel in this situation.", "options": ["c-b-d"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:25.314055+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 92, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.15", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from four responses the most effective course of action to manage both the emotions the person is feeling and the problems they face in that situation. Although more than one course of action might be acceptable, you are asked to choose what you think the most effective response for that person in that situation would be. Remember, you are not necessarily choosing what you would do, or the nicest thing to do, but choosing the most effective response for that situation. Select one or more response(s) by returning the one or more corresponding lowercase letter(s) ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd'), and, if you selected more than one, sorting them, separated by hyphen, in the order that you think best ranks them from most to least effective, within the context of the vignette provided."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Max prides himself on his work being of the highest quality. On a joint project, other people do a lousy job, assuming that Max will fix their mistakes. What action would be the most effective for Max? (a) Forget about it; (b) Confront the others, and tell them they must fix their mistakes; (c) Tell the project manager about the situation; (d) Fix the mistakes."}], "sampled": ["Ranking: b-c-d\n\nExplanation: \n\n(b) Confronting the others and telling them they must fix their mistakes is the most effective course of action. This will communicate to the others that Max is not willing to accept their subpar work and will hold them accountable for their mistakes. It will also prevent Max from taking on all the work himself and potentially burning out.\n\n(c) Telling the project manager about the situation is also a good option, as it will bring attention to the issue and may result in the project manager taking action to ensure that everyone is doing their fair share of the work.\n\n(d) Fixing the mistakes himself is not the most effective course of action, as it enables the others to continue with their subpar work and puts all the responsibility on Max.\n\n(a) Forgetting about it is not an effective course of action, as it allows the problem to continue and does not address the issue at hand."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:25.414639+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 93, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.15", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "b-c", "picked": null, "sampled": "Ranking: b-c-d\n\nExplanation: \n\n(b) Confronting the others and telling them they must fix their mistakes is the most effective course of action. This will communicate to the others that Max is not willing to accept their subpar work and will hold them accountable for their mistakes. It will also prevent Max from taking on all the work himself and potentially burning out.\n\n(c) Telling the project manager about the situation is also a good option, as it will bring attention to the issue and may result in the project manager taking action to ensure that everyone is doing their fair share of the work.\n\n(d) Fixing the mistakes himself is not the most effective course of action, as it enables the others to continue with their subpar work and puts all the responsibility on Max.\n\n(a) Forgetting about it is not an effective course of action, as it allows the problem to continue and does not address the issue at hand.", "options": ["b-c"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:25.414693+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 94, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.51", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. The following questions each describe a situation, and ask you to choose which of five emotions is most likely to result from that situation. Here is an example: Clara receives a gift Clara is most likely to feel?  (a) happy (b) angry (c) frightened (d) bored (e) hungry. If you think Clara would feel happy, you would mark option A and then move to the next question. Select the most emotionally intelligent response by returning the one lowercase letter ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd') corresponding to that response."}, {"role": "user", "content": "If the current situation continues, Denise's employer will probably be able to move her job to a location much closer to her home, which she really wants. Denise is most likely to feel? (a) Distress; (b) Joy; (c) Surprise; (d) Hope; (e) Fear"}], "sampled": ["(b) Joy"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:25.604547+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 95, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.51", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "d", "picked": null, "sampled": "(b) Joy", "options": ["d"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:25.604577+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 96, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.49", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. The following questions each describe a situation, and ask you to choose which of five emotions is most likely to result from that situation. Here is an example: Clara receives a gift Clara is most likely to feel?  (a) happy (b) angry (c) frightened (d) bored (e) hungry. If you think Clara would feel happy, you would mark option A and then move to the next question. Select the most emotionally intelligent response by returning the one lowercase letter ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd') corresponding to that response."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Edna's workmate organizes a goodbye party for Edna, who is going on holidays. Edna is most likely to feel? (a) Surprise; (b) Gratitude; (c) Pride; (d) Hope; (e) Relief"}], "sampled": ["(b) Gratitude."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:26.097966+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 97, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.49", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "b", "picked": null, "sampled": "(b) Gratitude.", "options": ["b"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:26.098012+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 98, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.23", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from four responses the most effective course of action to manage both the emotions the person is feeling and the problems they face in that situation. Although more than one course of action might be acceptable, you are asked to choose what you think the most effective response for that person in that situation would be. Remember, you are not necessarily choosing what you would do, or the nicest thing to do, but choosing the most effective response for that situation. Select one or more response(s) by returning the one or more corresponding lowercase letter(s) ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd'), and, if you selected more than one, sorting them, separated by hyphen, in the order that you think best ranks them from most to least effective, within the context of the vignette provided."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Gloria's housemates never buy essential non-food items when they are running low, relying on Gloria to buy them, which she resents. They know each other reasonably well, but have not yet discussed financial issues. What action would be the most effective for Gloria? (a) Don't buy the items; (b) Introduce a new system for grocery shopping and sharing costs; (c) Tell her housemates she has a problem with this; (d) Hide her own personal store of items from the others."}], "sampled": ["(b) Introduce a new system for grocery shopping and sharing costs; (c) Tell her housemates she has a problem with this. \n\nExplanation: \nOption (a) of not buying the items may lead to resentment and tension among the housemates, and may not solve the underlying issue. Option (d) of hiding her own personal store of items is not a sustainable solution and may lead to further conflict. \n\nOption (b) of introducing a new system for grocery shopping and sharing costs can help establish clear expectations and responsibilities among the housemates, and may prevent future misunderstandings. Option (c) of telling her housemates she has a problem with this can help open up communication and allow for a discussion of the issue, leading to a potential resolution."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:26.101854+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 99, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.23", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "c-b", "picked": null, "sampled": "(b) Introduce a new system for grocery shopping and sharing costs; (c) Tell her housemates she has a problem with this. \n\nExplanation: \nOption (a) of not buying the items may lead to resentment and tension among the housemates, and may not solve the underlying issue. Option (d) of hiding her own personal store of items is not a sustainable solution and may lead to further conflict. \n\nOption (b) of introducing a new system for grocery shopping and sharing costs can help establish clear expectations and responsibilities among the housemates, and may prevent future misunderstandings. Option (c) of telling her housemates she has a problem with this can help open up communication and allow for a discussion of the issue, leading to a potential resolution.", "options": ["c-b"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:26.101893+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 100, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.65", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. The following questions each describe a situation, and ask you to choose which of five emotions is most likely to result from that situation. Here is an example: Clara receives a gift Clara is most likely to feel?  (a) happy (b) angry (c) frightened (d) bored (e) hungry. If you think Clara would feel happy, you would mark option A and then move to the next question. Select the most emotionally intelligent response by returning the one lowercase letter ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd') corresponding to that response."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Someone thinks that another person has deliberately caused something good to happen to them. They are most likely to feel? (a) Hope; (b) Pride; (c) Gratitude; (d) Surprise; (e) Relief"}], "sampled": ["(c) Gratitude"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:26.251723+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 101, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.65", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "c", "picked": null, "sampled": "(c) Gratitude", "options": ["c"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:26.251784+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 102, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.33", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from four responses the most effective course of action to manage both the emotions the person is feeling and the problems they face in that situation. Although more than one course of action might be acceptable, you are asked to choose what you think the most effective response for that person in that situation would be. Remember, you are not necessarily choosing what you would do, or the nicest thing to do, but choosing the most effective response for that situation. Select one or more response(s) by returning the one or more corresponding lowercase letter(s) ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd'), and, if you selected more than one, sorting them, separated by hyphen, in the order that you think best ranks them from most to least effective, within the context of the vignette provided."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Blair and Flynn usually go to a cafe after the working week and chat about what's going on in the company. After Blair's job is moved to a different section in the company, he stops coming to the cafe. Flynn misses these Friday talks. What action would be the most effective for Flynn? (a) Go to the cafe or socialize with other workers; (b) Don't worry about it, ignore the changes and let Blair be; (c) Not talk to Blair again; (d) Invite Blair again, maybe rescheduling for another time."}], "sampled": ["(d) Invite Blair again, maybe rescheduling for another time."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:26.257801+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 103, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.33", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "d-a", "picked": null, "sampled": "(d) Invite Blair again, maybe rescheduling for another time.", "options": ["d-a"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:26.257841+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 104, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.19", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from four responses the most effective course of action to manage both the emotions the person is feeling and the problems they face in that situation. Although more than one course of action might be acceptable, you are asked to choose what you think the most effective response for that person in that situation would be. Remember, you are not necessarily choosing what you would do, or the nicest thing to do, but choosing the most effective response for that situation. Select one or more response(s) by returning the one or more corresponding lowercase letter(s) ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd'), and, if you selected more than one, sorting them, separated by hyphen, in the order that you think best ranks them from most to least effective, within the context of the vignette provided."}, {"role": "user", "content": "The woman who relieves Celia at the end of her shift is twenty minutes late without excuse or apology. What action would be the most effective for Celia? (a) Forget about it unless it happens again; (b) Tell the boss about it; (c) Ask for an explanation of her lateness; (d) Tell her that this is unacceptable."}], "sampled": ["(a) Forget about it unless it happens again."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:26.373345+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 105, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.19", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "c-a-d-b", "picked": null, "sampled": "(a) Forget about it unless it happens again.", "options": ["c-a-d-b"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:26.373404+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 106, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.41", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from four responses the most effective course of action to manage both the emotions the person is feeling and the problems they face in that situation. Although more than one course of action might be acceptable, you are asked to choose what you think the most effective response for that person in that situation would be. Remember, you are not necessarily choosing what you would do, or the nicest thing to do, but choosing the most effective response for that situation. Select one or more response(s) by returning the one or more corresponding lowercase letter(s) ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd'), and, if you selected more than one, sorting them, separated by hyphen, in the order that you think best ranks them from most to least effective, within the context of the vignette provided."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Jumah has been working at a new job part-time while he studies. His shift times for the week are changed at the last minute, without consulting him. What action would be the most effective for Jumah? (a) Refuse to work the new shifts; (b) Find out if there is some reasonable explanation for the shift changes; (c) Tell the manager in charge of shifts that he is not happy about it; (d) Grumpily accept the changes and do the shifts."}], "sampled": ["The most effective course of action for Jumah would be to select (b) Find out if there is some reasonable explanation for the shift changes. It is important for Jumah to understand why the shift changes were made before taking any action. This will help him to determine if the changes are reasonable and if there is anything he can do to negotiate a better arrangement. If Jumah is not satisfied with the explanation, he can then consider discussing the matter with the manager in charge of shifts, but in a calm and professional manner. Refusing to work the new shifts or grumpily accepting the changes without understanding the reason behind them may not be the most effective way to manage the situation."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:26.593932+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 107, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.41", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "b-c", "picked": null, "sampled": "The most effective course of action for Jumah would be to select (b) Find out if there is some reasonable explanation for the shift changes. It is important for Jumah to understand why the shift changes were made before taking any action. This will help him to determine if the changes are reasonable and if there is anything he can do to negotiate a better arrangement. If Jumah is not satisfied with the explanation, he can then consider discussing the matter with the manager in charge of shifts, but in a calm and professional manner. Refusing to work the new shifts or grumpily accepting the changes without understanding the reason behind them may not be the most effective way to manage the situation.", "options": ["b-c"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:26.593990+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 108, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.53", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. The following questions each describe a situation, and ask you to choose which of five emotions is most likely to result from that situation. Here is an example: Clara receives a gift Clara is most likely to feel?  (a) happy (b) angry (c) frightened (d) bored (e) hungry. If you think Clara would feel happy, you would mark option A and then move to the next question. Select the most emotionally intelligent response by returning the one lowercase letter ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd') corresponding to that response."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Somebody is most likely to feel surprised after? (a) Something unexpected happens; (b) Something unfamiliar happens; (c) Something unusual happens; (d) Something scary happens; (e) Something silly happens."}], "sampled": ["(a) Something unexpected happens."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:26.847262+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 109, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.53", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "a", "picked": null, "sampled": "(a) Something unexpected happens.", "options": ["a"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:26.847295+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 110, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.61", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. The following questions each describe a situation, and ask you to choose which of five emotions is most likely to result from that situation. Here is an example: Clara receives a gift Clara is most likely to feel?  (a) happy (b) angry (c) frightened (d) bored (e) hungry. If you think Clara would feel happy, you would mark option A and then move to the next question. Select the most emotionally intelligent response by returning the one lowercase letter ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd') corresponding to that response."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Sheila's workmate intentionally does not give Sheila some important information about applying for a raise. Sheila is most likely to feel? (a) Depressed; (b) Contemptuous; (c) Frustrated; (d) Angry; (e) Distressed"}], "sampled": ["(d) Angry"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:26.854640+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 111, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.61", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "d", "picked": null, "sampled": "(d) Angry", "options": ["d"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:26.854672+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 112, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.66", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. The following questions each describe a situation, and ask you to choose which of five emotions is most likely to result from that situation. Here is an example: Clara receives a gift Clara is most likely to feel?  (a) happy (b) angry (c) frightened (d) bored (e) hungry. If you think Clara would feel happy, you would mark option A and then move to the next question. Select the most emotionally intelligent response by returning the one lowercase letter ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd') corresponding to that response."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Kevin has been working at his current job for a few years. Out of the blue, he finds that he will receive a promotion. Kevin is most likely to feel? (a) Pride; (b) Relief; (c) Joy; (d) Hope; (e) Guilt"}], "sampled": ["(a) Pride."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:26.919637+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 113, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.66", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "e", "picked": null, "sampled": "(a) Pride.", "options": ["e"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:26.919668+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 114, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.25", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from four responses the most effective course of action to manage both the emotions the person is feeling and the problems they face in that situation. Although more than one course of action might be acceptable, you are asked to choose what you think the most effective response for that person in that situation would be. Remember, you are not necessarily choosing what you would do, or the nicest thing to do, but choosing the most effective response for that situation. Select one or more response(s) by returning the one or more corresponding lowercase letter(s) ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd'), and, if you selected more than one, sorting them, separated by hyphen, in the order that you think best ranks them from most to least effective, within the context of the vignette provided."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Moshe finds out that some members of his social sports team have been saying that he is not a very good player. What action would be the most effective for Moshe? (a) Although he may be bad at sport remember he is good at other things; (b) Forget about it; (c) Do some extra training to try and improve; (d) Leave that sports team."}], "sampled": ["c-d. The most effective course of action for Moshe would be to do some extra training to try and improve (c) and, if the situation does not improve, to leave that sports team (d). By doing extra training, Moshe can improve his skills and prove his teammates wrong. However, if the situation does not improve and he continues to feel uncomfortable or unwelcome on the team, leaving may be the best option for his emotional well-being. Telling Moshe to forget about it (b) may not be helpful as it may cause him to suppress his emotions and not address the issue. Telling Moshe to focus on his other strengths (a) may be helpful in boosting his self-esteem, but it does not address the issue at hand."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:27.032498+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 115, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.25", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "c-a", "picked": null, "sampled": "c-d. The most effective course of action for Moshe would be to do some extra training to try and improve (c) and, if the situation does not improve, to leave that sports team (d). By doing extra training, Moshe can improve his skills and prove his teammates wrong. However, if the situation does not improve and he continues to feel uncomfortable or unwelcome on the team, leaving may be the best option for his emotional well-being. Telling Moshe to forget about it (b) may not be helpful as it may cause him to suppress his emotions and not address the issue. Telling Moshe to focus on his other strengths (a) may be helpful in boosting his self-esteem, but it does not address the issue at hand.", "options": ["c-a"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:27.032612+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 116, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.78", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. The following questions each describe a situation, and ask you to choose which of five emotions is most likely to result from that situation. Here is an example: Clara receives a gift Clara is most likely to feel?  (a) happy (b) angry (c) frightened (d) bored (e) hungry. If you think Clara would feel happy, you would mark option A and then move to the next question. Select the most emotionally intelligent response by returning the one lowercase letter ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd') corresponding to that response."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Leila has been unable to sleep well lately and there are no changes in her life that might indicate why. Leila is most likely to feel? (a) Angry; (b) Scared; (c) Sad; (d) Distressed; (e) Guilty"}], "sampled": ["(c) Sad"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:27.294293+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 117, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.78", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "d", "picked": null, "sampled": "(c) Sad", "options": ["d"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:27.294350+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 118, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.27", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from four responses the most effective course of action to manage both the emotions the person is feeling and the problems they face in that situation. Although more than one course of action might be acceptable, you are asked to choose what you think the most effective response for that person in that situation would be. Remember, you are not necessarily choosing what you would do, or the nicest thing to do, but choosing the most effective response for that situation. Select one or more response(s) by returning the one or more corresponding lowercase letter(s) ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd'), and, if you selected more than one, sorting them, separated by hyphen, in the order that you think best ranks them from most to least effective, within the context of the vignette provided."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Hasina is overseas when she finds out that her father has passed away from an illness he has had for years. What action would be the most effective for Hasina? (a) Contact her close relatives for information and support; (b) Try not to think about it, going on with her daily life as best she can; (c) Feel terrible that she left the country at such a time; (d) Think deeply about the more profound meaning of this loss."}], "sampled": ["Response: (a) Contact her close relatives for information and support.\n\nExplanation: Hasina is in a difficult emotional situation, having just found out about her father's passing while being overseas. In this situation, it would be most effective for her to reach out to her close relatives for information and support. This will help her to feel more connected to her family and to get the support she needs to cope with her emotions. Option (b) is not effective as it suggests avoiding the situation, which can lead to unresolved emotions and difficulties in the future. Option (c) is not effective as it suggests blaming herself for leaving the country, which is not helpful or productive. Option (d) may be helpful for some people, but in this situation, it is not the most effective course of action as it does not address the immediate emotional needs of Hasina."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:27.791300+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 119, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.27", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "a", "picked": null, "sampled": "Response: (a) Contact her close relatives for information and support.\n\nExplanation: Hasina is in a difficult emotional situation, having just found out about her father's passing while being overseas. In this situation, it would be most effective for her to reach out to her close relatives for information and support. This will help her to feel more connected to her family and to get the support she needs to cope with her emotions. Option (b) is not effective as it suggests avoiding the situation, which can lead to unresolved emotions and difficulties in the future. Option (c) is not effective as it suggests blaming herself for leaving the country, which is not helpful or productive. Option (d) may be helpful for some people, but in this situation, it is not the most effective course of action as it does not address the immediate emotional needs of Hasina.", "options": ["a"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:27.791358+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 120, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.77", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. The following questions each describe a situation, and ask you to choose which of five emotions is most likely to result from that situation. Here is an example: Clara receives a gift Clara is most likely to feel?  (a) happy (b) angry (c) frightened (d) bored (e) hungry. If you think Clara would feel happy, you would mark option A and then move to the next question. Select the most emotionally intelligent response by returning the one lowercase letter ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd') corresponding to that response."}, {"role": "user", "content": "The nature of Sara's job changes due to unpredictable factors and she no longer gets to do the portions of her work that she most enjoyed. Sara is most likely to feel? (a) Ashamed; (b) Sad; (c) Angry; (d) Distressed; (e) Frustrated"}], "sampled": ["(b) Sad"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:27.948809+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 121, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.77", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "b", "picked": null, "sampled": "(b) Sad", "options": ["b"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:27.948868+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 122, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.94", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from among four responses what you would be most likely to do in the situation. Please note, there are no right or wrong answers. We all deal with situations in different ways. All that you need to do is answer each question honestly. Select one or more response(s) by returning the one or more corresponding lowercase letter(s) ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd'), and, if you selected more than one, sorting them, separated by hyphen, in the order that you think best ranks them from most to least effective, within the context of the vignette provided."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are the secretary for your school chess club. You just found out that some of the club members have been complaining because you lose things and don't show up on time. What would you do in this situation? (a) Point out that you are not the only one who is late; (b) Make a list of your strengths and find a role in the club that would better suit you; (c) Quit the club and look for another one that will appreciate you; (d) Make an effort to be on time and keep track of things"}], "sampled": ["d"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:28.654736+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 123, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.94", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "a-b-c-d", "picked": null, "sampled": "d", "options": ["a-b-c-d"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:28.654878+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 124, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.57", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. The following questions each describe a situation, and ask you to choose which of five emotions is most likely to result from that situation. Here is an example: Clara receives a gift Clara is most likely to feel?  (a) happy (b) angry (c) frightened (d) bored (e) hungry. If you think Clara would feel happy, you would mark option A and then move to the next question. Select the most emotionally intelligent response by returning the one lowercase letter ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd') corresponding to that response."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Someone believes that another person harmed them on purpose. There is not a lot that can be done to make things better. The person involved is most likely to feel? (a) Dislike; (b) Rage; (c) Jealousy; (d) Surprise; (e) Anxiety"}], "sampled": ["(b) Rage."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:29.343519+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 125, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.57", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "a", "picked": null, "sampled": "(b) Rage.", "options": ["a"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:29.343615+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 126, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.21", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from four responses the most effective course of action to manage both the emotions the person is feeling and the problems they face in that situation. Although more than one course of action might be acceptable, you are asked to choose what you think the most effective response for that person in that situation would be. Remember, you are not necessarily choosing what you would do, or the nicest thing to do, but choosing the most effective response for that situation. Select one or more response(s) by returning the one or more corresponding lowercase letter(s) ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd'), and, if you selected more than one, sorting them, separated by hyphen, in the order that you think best ranks them from most to least effective, within the context of the vignette provided."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Evan's housemate cooked food late at night and left a huge mess in the kitchen that Evan discovered at breakfast. What action would be the most effective for Evan? (a) Tell his housemate to clean up the mess; (b) Ask his housemate that this not happen again; (c) Clean up the mess himself; (d) Assume that the housemate will clean it later."}], "sampled": ["b-c: Asking his housemate that this not happen again and cleaning up the mess himself would be the most effective course of action for Evan. By asking his housemate not to repeat the behavior, Evan is setting clear boundaries and expectations for future behavior. By cleaning up the mess himself, Evan is taking responsibility for his own environment and avoiding potential conflict with his housemate."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:29.677451+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 127, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.21", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "b-a-d", "picked": null, "sampled": "b-c: Asking his housemate that this not happen again and cleaning up the mess himself would be the most effective course of action for Evan. By asking his housemate not to repeat the behavior, Evan is setting clear boundaries and expectations for future behavior. By cleaning up the mess himself, Evan is taking responsibility for his own environment and avoiding potential conflict with his housemate.", "options": ["b-a-d"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:29.677525+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 128, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.79", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. The following questions each describe a situation, and ask you to choose which of five emotions is most likely to result from that situation. Here is an example: Clara receives a gift Clara is most likely to feel?  (a) happy (b) angry (c) frightened (d) bored (e) hungry. If you think Clara would feel happy, you would mark option A and then move to the next question. Select the most emotionally intelligent response by returning the one lowercase letter ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd') corresponding to that response."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A person feels they have control over a situation. The situation turns out badly for no particular reason. The person involved is most likely to feel? (a) Confused; (b) Relieved; (c) Surprised; (d) Frustrated; (e) Distressed"}], "sampled": ["(d) Frustrated."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:30.311722+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 129, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.79", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "d", "picked": null, "sampled": "(d) Frustrated.", "options": ["d"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:30.311780+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 130, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.40", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from four responses the most effective course of action to manage both the emotions the person is feeling and the problems they face in that situation. Although more than one course of action might be acceptable, you are asked to choose what you think the most effective response for that person in that situation would be. Remember, you are not necessarily choosing what you would do, or the nicest thing to do, but choosing the most effective response for that situation. Select one or more response(s) by returning the one or more corresponding lowercase letter(s) ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd'), and, if you selected more than one, sorting them, separated by hyphen, in the order that you think best ranks them from most to least effective, within the context of the vignette provided."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Reece's friend points out that her young children seem to be developing more quickly than Reece's. Reece sees that this is true. What action would be the most effective for Reece? (a) Talk the issue over with another friend; (b) Angrily confront her friend about making such statements; (c) Realize that children develop at different rates; (d) Talk to a doctor about what the normal rates of development are."}], "sampled": ["(c) Realize that children develop at different rates. (d) Talk to a doctor about what the normal rates of development are."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:31.272151+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 131, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.40", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "d-c", "picked": null, "sampled": "(c) Realize that children develop at different rates. (d) Talk to a doctor about what the normal rates of development are.", "options": ["d-c"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:31.272196+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 132, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.92", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from among four responses what you would be most likely to do in the situation. Please note, there are no right or wrong answers. We all deal with situations in different ways. All that you need to do is answer each question honestly. Select one or more response(s) by returning the one or more corresponding lowercase letter(s) ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd'), and, if you selected more than one, sorting them, separated by hyphen, in the order that you think best ranks them from most to least effective, within the context of the vignette provided."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You have been working very hard with other students on a group project. A member of your team gives you some badly written work to include in the project. There is very little time before the project is due. What would you do in this situation? (a) Suggest ways that the student can improve the work; (b) Don't worry about it, just put the bad work in; (c) Tell the teacher about the situation; (d) Rewrite the work yourself"}], "sampled": ["a-d"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:31.947359+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 133, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.92", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "a-c-d-b", "picked": null, "sampled": "a-d", "options": ["a-c-d-b"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:31.947423+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 134, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.76", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. The following questions each describe a situation, and ask you to choose which of five emotions is most likely to result from that situation. Here is an example: Clara receives a gift Clara is most likely to feel?  (a) happy (b) angry (c) frightened (d) bored (e) hungry. If you think Clara would feel happy, you would mark option A and then move to the next question. Select the most emotionally intelligent response by returning the one lowercase letter ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd') corresponding to that response."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A supervisor who is unpleasant to work for leaves Alfonso's work. Alfonso is most likely to feel? (a) Joy; (b) Hope; (c) Regret; (d) Relief; (e) Sadness"}], "sampled": ["(d) Relief"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:32.658809+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 135, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.76", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "d", "picked": null, "sampled": "(d) Relief", "options": ["d"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:32.658863+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 136, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.2", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from four responses the most effective course of action to manage both the emotions the person is feeling and the problems they face in that situation. Although more than one course of action might be acceptable, you are asked to choose what you think the most effective response for that person in that situation would be. Remember, you are not necessarily choosing what you would do, or the nicest thing to do, but choosing the most effective response for that situation. Select one or more response(s) by returning the one or more corresponding lowercase letter(s) ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd'), and, if you selected more than one, sorting them, separated by hyphen, in the order that you think best ranks them from most to least effective, within the context of the vignette provided."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Pete has specific skills that his workmates do not and he feels that his workload is higher because of it. What action would be the most effective for Pete? (a) Speak to his boss about this; (b) Start looking for a new job; (c) Be very proud of his unique skills; (d) Speak to his workmates about this."}], "sampled": ["a-d. The most effective course of action for Pete would be to speak to his boss about his workload. He can explain how his unique skills are contributing to his higher workload and ask for a solution that would balance the workload among his colleagues. It is also important for him to speak to his workmates about this, as they may not be aware of the situation and may be willing to help. Starting to look for a new job or being proud of his unique skills may not address the problem at hand."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:32.664829+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 137, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.2", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "a-c-d", "picked": null, "sampled": "a-d. The most effective course of action for Pete would be to speak to his boss about his workload. He can explain how his unique skills are contributing to his higher workload and ask for a solution that would balance the workload among his colleagues. It is also important for him to speak to his workmates about this, as they may not be aware of the situation and may be willing to help. Starting to look for a new job or being proud of his unique skills may not address the problem at hand.", "options": ["a-c-d"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:32.664871+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 138, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.36", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from four responses the most effective course of action to manage both the emotions the person is feeling and the problems they face in that situation. Although more than one course of action might be acceptable, you are asked to choose what you think the most effective response for that person in that situation would be. Remember, you are not necessarily choosing what you would do, or the nicest thing to do, but choosing the most effective response for that situation. Select one or more response(s) by returning the one or more corresponding lowercase letter(s) ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd'), and, if you selected more than one, sorting them, separated by hyphen, in the order that you think best ranks them from most to least effective, within the context of the vignette provided."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Dorian needs to have some prostate surgery and is quite scared about the process. He has heard that it is quite painful. What action would be the most effective for Dorian? (a) Find out as much as he can about the procedure and focus on calming down; (b) Keep busy in the meantime so he doesn't think about the impending surgery; (c) Talk to his family about his concerns; (d) Talk to his doctor about what will happen."}], "sampled": ["The most effective course of action for Dorian would be (a) Find out as much as he can about the procedure and focus on calming down; (d) Talk to his doctor about what will happen. By finding out as much as he can about the procedure, Dorian can gain a better understanding of what to expect and alleviate some of his fears. Talking to his doctor can also provide reassurance and help him understand the process better. Keeping busy or talking to family may not address his concerns directly and may not be as effective in managing his anxiety."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:33.219191+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 139, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.36", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "d-a", "picked": null, "sampled": "The most effective course of action for Dorian would be (a) Find out as much as he can about the procedure and focus on calming down; (d) Talk to his doctor about what will happen. By finding out as much as he can about the procedure, Dorian can gain a better understanding of what to expect and alleviate some of his fears. Talking to his doctor can also provide reassurance and help him understand the process better. Keeping busy or talking to family may not address his concerns directly and may not be as effective in managing his anxiety.", "options": ["d-a"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:33.219250+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 140, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.55", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. The following questions each describe a situation, and ask you to choose which of five emotions is most likely to result from that situation. Here is an example: Clara receives a gift Clara is most likely to feel?  (a) happy (b) angry (c) frightened (d) bored (e) hungry. If you think Clara would feel happy, you would mark option A and then move to the next question. Select the most emotionally intelligent response by returning the one lowercase letter ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd') corresponding to that response."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Charles is meeting a friend to see a movie. The friend is very late and they are not in time to make it to the movie. Charles is most likely to feel? (a) Depressed; (b) Frustrated; (c) Angry; (d) Contemptuous; (e) Distressed"}], "sampled": ["(b) Frustrated."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:33.347928+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 141, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.55", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "c", "picked": null, "sampled": "(b) Frustrated.", "options": ["c"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:33.347985+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 142, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.5", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from four responses the most effective course of action to manage both the emotions the person is feeling and the problems they face in that situation. Although more than one course of action might be acceptable, you are asked to choose what you think the most effective response for that person in that situation would be. Remember, you are not necessarily choosing what you would do, or the nicest thing to do, but choosing the most effective response for that situation. Select one or more response(s) by returning the one or more corresponding lowercase letter(s) ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd'), and, if you selected more than one, sorting them, separated by hyphen, in the order that you think best ranks them from most to least effective, within the context of the vignette provided."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Martina is accepted for a highly sought after contract, but has to fly to the location. Martina has a phobia of flying. What action would be the most effective for Martina? (a) See a doctor about this; (b) Don't go to the location; (c) Just get through it; (d) Find alternative travel arrangements."}], "sampled": ["a-d. The most effective course of action for Martina would be to see a doctor about her phobia of flying and find alternative travel arrangements. Seeing a doctor can help Martina manage her anxiety and fear of flying, and finding alternative travel arrangements can help her avoid the trigger of her phobia altogether. Avoiding the location (b) is not a viable option if the contract is highly sought after, and just getting through it (c) may cause unnecessary stress and anxiety for Martina."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:33.535843+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 143, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.5", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a-d", "picked": "a-d", "sampled": "a-d. The most effective course of action for Martina would be to see a doctor about her phobia of flying and find alternative travel arrangements. Seeing a doctor can help Martina manage her anxiety and fear of flying, and finding alternative travel arrangements can help her avoid the trigger of her phobia altogether. Avoiding the location (b) is not a viable option if the contract is highly sought after, and just getting through it (c) may cause unnecessary stress and anxiety for Martina.", "options": ["a-d"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:33.535883+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 144, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.18", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from four responses the most effective course of action to manage both the emotions the person is feeling and the problems they face in that situation. Although more than one course of action might be acceptable, you are asked to choose what you think the most effective response for that person in that situation would be. Remember, you are not necessarily choosing what you would do, or the nicest thing to do, but choosing the most effective response for that situation. Select one or more response(s) by returning the one or more corresponding lowercase letter(s) ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd'), and, if you selected more than one, sorting them, separated by hyphen, in the order that you think best ranks them from most to least effective, within the context of the vignette provided."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Mei Ling answers the phone and hears that close relatives are in hospital critically ill. What action would be the most effective for Mei Ling? (a) Let herself cry and express emotion for as long as she feels like; (b) Speak to other family to calm herself and find out what is happening, then visit the hospital; (c) There is nothing she can do; (d) Visit the hospital and ask staff about their condition."}], "sampled": ["b-d. \n\nExplanation: In this situation, it is important for Mei Ling to take action to manage her emotions and also address the problem at hand. Option (a) may be a natural response, but it does not address the problem and may prolong her distress. Option (c) is not helpful and may make Mei Ling feel helpless. Option (b) is a good first step as it allows her to gather information and seek support from other family members. Option (d) is also important as it allows her to directly address the problem and get updates on the condition of her relatives."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:33.598896+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 145, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.18", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "b-a", "picked": null, "sampled": "b-d. \n\nExplanation: In this situation, it is important for Mei Ling to take action to manage her emotions and also address the problem at hand. Option (a) may be a natural response, but it does not address the problem and may prolong her distress. Option (c) is not helpful and may make Mei Ling feel helpless. Option (b) is a good first step as it allows her to gather information and seek support from other family members. Option (d) is also important as it allows her to directly address the problem and get updates on the condition of her relatives.", "options": ["b-a"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:33.598930+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 146, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.38", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from four responses the most effective course of action to manage both the emotions the person is feeling and the problems they face in that situation. Although more than one course of action might be acceptable, you are asked to choose what you think the most effective response for that person in that situation would be. Remember, you are not necessarily choosing what you would do, or the nicest thing to do, but choosing the most effective response for that situation. Select one or more response(s) by returning the one or more corresponding lowercase letter(s) ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd'), and, if you selected more than one, sorting them, separated by hyphen, in the order that you think best ranks them from most to least effective, within the context of the vignette provided."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Jill is given an official warning for entering a restricted area. She was never informed that the area was restricted and will lose her job if she gets two more warnings, which she thinks is unfair. What action would be the most effective for Jill? (a) Think about the unfairness of the situation; (b) Accept the warning and be careful not to go in restricted areas from now on; (c) Explain that she didn't know it was restricted; (d) Take a few deep breaths and calm down about it."}], "sampled": ["b - Accept the warning and be careful not to go in restricted areas from now on; c - Explain that she didn't know it was restricted. \n\nExplanation: \n\nOption (b) is the most effective response because it acknowledges the warning and takes responsibility for future actions. This response shows that Jill is willing to learn from her mistake and take steps to prevent it from happening again. \n\nOption (c) is also effective because it provides an explanation for Jill's actions and shows that she is not intentionally breaking the rules. This response may help to mitigate the severity of the warning and prevent future misunderstandings. \n\nOption (a) is not an effective response because it does not address the problem at hand and may lead to further negative emotions. \n\nOption (d) may be helpful for Jill to manage her emotions, but it does not address the problem or provide a solution."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:33.982080+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 147, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.38", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "b-c", "picked": null, "sampled": "b - Accept the warning and be careful not to go in restricted areas from now on; c - Explain that she didn't know it was restricted. \n\nExplanation: \n\nOption (b) is the most effective response because it acknowledges the warning and takes responsibility for future actions. This response shows that Jill is willing to learn from her mistake and take steps to prevent it from happening again. \n\nOption (c) is also effective because it provides an explanation for Jill's actions and shows that she is not intentionally breaking the rules. This response may help to mitigate the severity of the warning and prevent future misunderstandings. \n\nOption (a) is not an effective response because it does not address the problem at hand and may lead to further negative emotions. \n\nOption (d) may be helpful for Jill to manage her emotions, but it does not address the problem or provide a solution.", "options": ["b-c"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:33.982140+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 148, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.86", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from among four responses what you would be most likely to do in the situation. Please note, there are no right or wrong answers. We all deal with situations in different ways. All that you need to do is answer each question honestly. Select the most emotionally intelligent response by returning the one lowercase letter ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd') corresponding to that response."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Amy is usually happy at work and things also go well for her at home. She thought that she and her coworkers were generally well-treated, including well-paid. Today, everyone in her unit received a modest pay increase as part of a corporate wide promotion. How did Amy feel? (a) Surprised and shocked; (b) Peaceful and quiet; (c) Humbled and guilty; (d) Proud and dominant"}], "sampled": ["(b) Peaceful and quiet."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:34.047074+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 149, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.86", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "b", "picked": null, "sampled": "(b) Peaceful and quiet.", "options": ["b"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:34.047133+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 150, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.16", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from four responses the most effective course of action to manage both the emotions the person is feeling and the problems they face in that situation. Although more than one course of action might be acceptable, you are asked to choose what you think the most effective response for that person in that situation would be. Remember, you are not necessarily choosing what you would do, or the nicest thing to do, but choosing the most effective response for that situation. Select one or more response(s) by returning the one or more corresponding lowercase letter(s) ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd'), and, if you selected more than one, sorting them, separated by hyphen, in the order that you think best ranks them from most to least effective, within the context of the vignette provided."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Daniel has been accepted for a prestigious position in a different country from his family, who he is close to. He and his wife decide it is worth relocating. What action would be the most effective for Daniel? (a) Realize he shouldn't have applied for the job if he didn't want to leave; (b) Set up a system for staying in touch, like weekly phone calls or emails; (c) Think about the great opportunities this change offers; (d) Don't take the position."}], "sampled": ["Response (b) would be the most effective for Daniel. Moving to a different country can be a difficult and emotional experience, especially when leaving loved ones behind. Setting up a system for staying in touch, like weekly phone calls or emails, can help Daniel and his family feel connected despite the distance. Response (c) could also be effective in helping Daniel focus on the positive aspects of the move, but it may not address the emotional challenges of being away from family. Responses (a) and (d) are not effective because they do not address the situation at hand and do not offer any solutions for managing the emotions and challenges that come with relocating."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:34.108082+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 151, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.16", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "b-c", "picked": null, "sampled": "Response (b) would be the most effective for Daniel. Moving to a different country can be a difficult and emotional experience, especially when leaving loved ones behind. Setting up a system for staying in touch, like weekly phone calls or emails, can help Daniel and his family feel connected despite the distance. Response (c) could also be effective in helping Daniel focus on the positive aspects of the move, but it may not address the emotional challenges of being away from family. Responses (a) and (d) are not effective because they do not address the situation at hand and do not offer any solutions for managing the emotions and challenges that come with relocating.", "options": ["b-c"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:34.108123+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 152, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.97", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from among four responses what you would be most likely to do in the situation. Please note, there are no right or wrong answers. We all deal with situations in different ways. All that you need to do is answer each question honestly. Select one or more response(s) by returning the one or more corresponding lowercase letter(s) ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd'), and, if you selected more than one, sorting them, separated by hyphen, in the order that you think best ranks them from most to least effective, within the context of the vignette provided."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Your best friend is moving to another state and is unlikely to come back. You have been good friends for many years. What would you do in this situation? (a) Make sure you both keep in contact through email, phone, or letter writing; (b) Spend time with other friends, and keep busy; (c) Hope that your best friend will return soon; (d) Forget about your best friend"}], "sampled": ["a) Make sure you both keep in contact through email, phone, or letter writing."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:34.139167+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 153, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.97", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "b-c-a-d", "picked": null, "sampled": "a) Make sure you both keep in contact through email, phone, or letter writing.", "options": ["b-c-a-d"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:34.139204+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 154, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.31", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from four responses the most effective course of action to manage both the emotions the person is feeling and the problems they face in that situation. Although more than one course of action might be acceptable, you are asked to choose what you think the most effective response for that person in that situation would be. Remember, you are not necessarily choosing what you would do, or the nicest thing to do, but choosing the most effective response for that situation. Select one or more response(s) by returning the one or more corresponding lowercase letter(s) ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd'), and, if you selected more than one, sorting them, separated by hyphen, in the order that you think best ranks them from most to least effective, within the context of the vignette provided."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Mallory moves from a small company to a very large one, where there is little personal contact, which she misses. What action would be the most effective for Mallory? (a) Talk to her workmates, try to create social contacts and make friends; (b) Start looking for a new job so she can leave that environment; (c) Just give it time, and things will be okay; (d) Concentrate on her outside-work friends and colleagues from previous jobs."}], "sampled": ["a) Talk to her workmates, try to create social contacts and make friends."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:35.059836+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 155, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.31", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "a-d", "picked": null, "sampled": "a) Talk to her workmates, try to create social contacts and make friends.", "options": ["a-d"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:35.059902+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 156, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.89", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from among four responses what you would be most likely to do in the situation. Please note, there are no right or wrong answers. We all deal with situations in different ways. All that you need to do is answer each question honestly. Select one or more response(s) by returning the one or more corresponding lowercase letter(s) ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd'), and, if you selected more than one, sorting them, separated by hyphen, in the order that you think best ranks them from most to least effective, within the context of the vignette provided."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You and James sometimes help each other with homework. After you help James on a difficult project, the teacher is very critical of this work. James blames you for his bad grade. You respond that James should be grateful, because you were doing him a favor. What would you do in this situation? (a) Tell him from now on he has to do his own homework; (b) Apologize to him; (c) Tell him I am happy to help, but you are responsible for what you turn ind; (d) Don't talk to him"}], "sampled": ["(c) Tell him I am happy to help, but you are responsible for what you turn in."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:35.140123+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 157, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.89", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "c-a-b-d", "picked": null, "sampled": "(c) Tell him I am happy to help, but you are responsible for what you turn in.", "options": ["c-a-b-d"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:35.140183+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 158, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.37", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from four responses the most effective course of action to manage both the emotions the person is feeling and the problems they face in that situation. Although more than one course of action might be acceptable, you are asked to choose what you think the most effective response for that person in that situation would be. Remember, you are not necessarily choosing what you would do, or the nicest thing to do, but choosing the most effective response for that situation. Select one or more response(s) by returning the one or more corresponding lowercase letter(s) ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd'), and, if you selected more than one, sorting them, separated by hyphen, in the order that you think best ranks them from most to least effective, within the context of the vignette provided."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Hannah's access to essential resources has been delayed and her work is way behind schedule. Her progress report makes no mention of the lack of resources. What action would be the most effective for Hannah? (a) Explain the lack of resources to her boss or to management; (b) Learn that she should plan ahead for next time; (c) Document the lack of resources in her progress report; (d) Don't worry about it."}], "sampled": ["The most effective course of action for Hannah would be to (c) document the lack of resources in her progress report. This will help her boss or management understand the reason for the delay in her work and take necessary actions to provide her with the essential resources. However, it would also be important for her to (a) explain the lack of resources to her boss or management, as this will help her to communicate the issue more effectively and ensure that the necessary actions are taken. Therefore, the most effective responses would be (c) followed by (a). Response (b) may be helpful for future planning, but it does not address the current situation. Response (d) is not an effective course of action as it does not address the problem and may lead to further delays and issues."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:35.301169+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 159, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.37", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "c-a", "picked": null, "sampled": "The most effective course of action for Hannah would be to (c) document the lack of resources in her progress report. This will help her boss or management understand the reason for the delay in her work and take necessary actions to provide her with the essential resources. However, it would also be important for her to (a) explain the lack of resources to her boss or management, as this will help her to communicate the issue more effectively and ensure that the necessary actions are taken. Therefore, the most effective responses would be (c) followed by (a). Response (b) may be helpful for future planning, but it does not address the current situation. Response (d) is not an effective course of action as it does not address the problem and may lead to further delays and issues.", "options": ["c-a"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:35.301230+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 160, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.88", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from among four responses what you would be most likely to do in the situation. Please note, there are no right or wrong answers. We all deal with situations in different ways. All that you need to do is answer each question honestly. Select the most emotionally intelligent response by returning the one lowercase letter ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd') corresponding to that response."}, {"role": "user", "content": "An executive in a corporation felt displeased and then resentful. What happened in between? (a) A subordinate failed to achieve his sales goals for the period; (b) Another officer in the company, who he believed to be incompetent, won a pay increase much larger than his own; (c) He read a news item about people in another part of the world living in poverty and how a major charity was facing obstacles in their relief efforts; (d) His wife was helping his children with their homework; (e) No one seemed to like him"}], "sampled": ["(b) Another officer in the company, who he believed to be incompetent, won a pay increase much larger than his own."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:36.189325+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 161, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.88", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "b", "picked": null, "sampled": "(b) Another officer in the company, who he believed to be incompetent, won a pay increase much larger than his own.", "options": ["b"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:36.189356+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 162, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.8", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from four responses the most effective course of action to manage both the emotions the person is feeling and the problems they face in that situation. Although more than one course of action might be acceptable, you are asked to choose what you think the most effective response for that person in that situation would be. Remember, you are not necessarily choosing what you would do, or the nicest thing to do, but choosing the most effective response for that situation. Select one or more response(s) by returning the one or more corresponding lowercase letter(s) ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd'), and, if you selected more than one, sorting them, separated by hyphen, in the order that you think best ranks them from most to least effective, within the context of the vignette provided."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Surbhi starts a new job where he doesn't know anyone and finds that no one is particularly friendly. What action would be the most effective for Surbhi? (a) Have fun with his friends outside of work hours; (b) Concentrate on doing his work well at the new job; (c) Make an effort to talk to people and be friendly himself; (d) Leave the job and find one with a better environment."}], "sampled": ["Response: (c) Make an effort to talk to people and be friendly himself. \n\nExplanation: While having fun with friends outside of work hours and concentrating on doing work well are both important, they do not directly address the issue of feeling isolated and unsupported at work. Leaving the job may also not be the best option without first attempting to improve the situation. Making an effort to talk to people and be friendly himself is the most effective response as it can help to build relationships and create a more positive work environment."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:36.234993+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 163, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.8", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "c-b", "picked": null, "sampled": "Response: (c) Make an effort to talk to people and be friendly himself. \n\nExplanation: While having fun with friends outside of work hours and concentrating on doing work well are both important, they do not directly address the issue of feeling isolated and unsupported at work. Leaving the job may also not be the best option without first attempting to improve the situation. Making an effort to talk to people and be friendly himself is the most effective response as it can help to build relationships and create a more positive work environment.", "options": ["c-b"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:36.235032+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 164, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.90", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from among four responses what you would be most likely to do in the situation. Please note, there are no right or wrong answers. We all deal with situations in different ways. All that you need to do is answer each question honestly. Select one or more response(s) by returning the one or more corresponding lowercase letter(s) ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd'), and, if you selected more than one, sorting them, separated by hyphen, in the order that you think best ranks them from most to least effective, within the context of the vignette provided."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are nervous about a speech that you need to give to the whole school about a project you've been working on. You are worried that some of the students will not understanding your speech, as it deals with some very difficult topics. What would you do in this situation? (a) Work on your speech to make it easier to understand and ask for questions afterwards; (b) Practice your speech in front of your family or close friends; (c) Just give the speech; (d) Be positive and confident, knowing it will go well"}], "sampled": ["a) Work on your speech to make it easier to understand and ask for questions afterwards; b) Practice your speech in front of your family or close friends."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:36.518999+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 165, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.90", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "a-b-d-c", "picked": null, "sampled": "a) Work on your speech to make it easier to understand and ask for questions afterwards; b) Practice your speech in front of your family or close friends.", "options": ["a-b-d-c"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:36.519064+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 166, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.43", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. The following questions each describe a situation, and ask you to choose which of five emotions is most likely to result from that situation. Here is an example: Clara receives a gift Clara is most likely to feel?  (a) happy (b) angry (c) frightened (d) bored (e) hungry. If you think Clara would feel happy, you would mark option A and then move to the next question. Select one or more response(s) by returning the one or more corresponding lowercase letter(s) ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd'), and, if you selected more than one, sorting them, separated by hyphen, in the order that you think best ranks them from most to least effective, within the context of the vignette provided."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Julie hasn't seen Ka for ages and looks forward to their weekend trip away. However, Ka has changed a lot and Julie finds that she is no longer an interesting companion. What action would be the most effective for Julie? (a) Cancel the trip and go home; (b) Realize that it is time to give up the friendship and move on; (c) Understand that people change, so move on, but remember the good times; (d) Concentrate on her other, more rewarding friendships."}], "sampled": ["(c) Understand that people change, so move on, but remember the good times."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:36.663083+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 167, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.43", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "c-d", "picked": null, "sampled": "(c) Understand that people change, so move on, but remember the good times.", "options": ["c-d"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:36.663143+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 168, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.30", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from four responses the most effective course of action to manage both the emotions the person is feeling and the problems they face in that situation. Although more than one course of action might be acceptable, you are asked to choose what you think the most effective response for that person in that situation would be. Remember, you are not necessarily choosing what you would do, or the nicest thing to do, but choosing the most effective response for that situation. Select one or more response(s) by returning the one or more corresponding lowercase letter(s) ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd'), and, if you selected more than one, sorting them, separated by hyphen, in the order that you think best ranks them from most to least effective, within the context of the vignette provided."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Juno is fairly sure his company is going down and his job is under threat. It is a large company and nothing official has been said. What action would be the most effective for Juno? (a) Find out what is happening and discuss his concerns with his family; (b) Try to keep the company afloat by working harder; (c) Start applying for other jobs; (d) Think of these events as an opportunity for a new start."}], "sampled": ["Response: (c) Start applying for other jobs.\n\nExplanation: Juno's job is under threat, and he is fairly sure that his company is going down. In this situation, it is important for Juno to start looking for other job opportunities. This will not only help him secure a job in case he loses his current one, but it will also give him a sense of control over the situation. Option (a) may not be effective as Juno may not have access to official information, and discussing his concerns with family may not provide a solution. Option (b) may not be effective as it is not solely Juno's responsibility to keep the company afloat, and working harder may not necessarily save the company. Option (d) may not be effective as it may not be easy for Juno to see these events as an opportunity for a new start, especially if he is worried about losing his job."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:36.701799+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 169, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.30", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "a-c", "picked": null, "sampled": "Response: (c) Start applying for other jobs.\n\nExplanation: Juno's job is under threat, and he is fairly sure that his company is going down. In this situation, it is important for Juno to start looking for other job opportunities. This will not only help him secure a job in case he loses his current one, but it will also give him a sense of control over the situation. Option (a) may not be effective as Juno may not have access to official information, and discussing his concerns with family may not provide a solution. Option (b) may not be effective as it is not solely Juno's responsibility to keep the company afloat, and working harder may not necessarily save the company. Option (d) may not be effective as it may not be easy for Juno to see these events as an opportunity for a new start, especially if he is worried about losing his job.", "options": ["a-c"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:36.701837+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 170, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.71", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. The following questions each describe a situation, and ask you to choose which of five emotions is most likely to result from that situation. Here is an example: Clara receives a gift Clara is most likely to feel?  (a) happy (b) angry (c) frightened (d) bored (e) hungry. If you think Clara would feel happy, you would mark option A and then move to the next question. Select the most emotionally intelligent response by returning the one lowercase letter ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd') corresponding to that response."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Although she has been careful to avoid all risk factors, Tina has contracted cancer. There is only a small chance that the cancer will be benign and nothing Tina does now can make a difference. Tina is most likely to feel? (a) Scared; (b) Distressed; (c) Irritated; (d) Sad; (e) Hopeful"}], "sampled": ["(d) Sad."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:36.822043+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 171, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.71", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "a", "picked": null, "sampled": "(d) Sad.", "options": ["a"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:36.822101+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 172, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.68", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. The following questions each describe a situation, and ask you to choose which of five emotions is most likely to result from that situation. Here is an example: Clara receives a gift Clara is most likely to feel?  (a) happy (b) angry (c) frightened (d) bored (e) hungry. If you think Clara would feel happy, you would mark option A and then move to the next question. Select the most emotionally intelligent response by returning the one lowercase letter ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd') corresponding to that response."}, {"role": "user", "content": "An unwanted situation becomes less likely or stops altogether. The person involved is most likely to feel? (a) Regret; (b) Hope; (c) Joy; (d) Sadness; (e) Relief"}], "sampled": ["(e) Relief."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:36.919782+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 173, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.68", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "e", "picked": null, "sampled": "(e) Relief.", "options": ["e"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:36.919829+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 174, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.52", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. The following questions each describe a situation, and ask you to choose which of five emotions is most likely to result from that situation. Here is an example: Clara receives a gift Clara is most likely to feel?  (a) happy (b) angry (c) frightened (d) bored (e) hungry. If you think Clara would feel happy, you would mark option A and then move to the next question. Select the most emotionally intelligent response by returning the one lowercase letter ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd') corresponding to that response."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Song finds out that a friend of hers has borrowed money from others to pay urgent bills, but has in fact used the money for less serious purposes. Song is most likely to feel? (a) Anger; (b) Excitement; (c) Contempt; (d) Shame; (e) Horror"}], "sampled": ["(a) Anger"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:37.620458+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 175, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.52", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "c", "picked": null, "sampled": "(a) Anger", "options": ["c"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:37.620502+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 176, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.48", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. The following questions each describe a situation, and ask you to choose which of five emotions is most likely to result from that situation. Here is an example: Clara receives a gift Clara is most likely to feel?  (a) happy (b) angry (c) frightened (d) bored (e) hungry. If you think Clara would feel happy, you would mark option A and then move to the next question. Select the most emotionally intelligent response by returning the one lowercase letter ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd') corresponding to that response."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Regret is most likely to occur when? (a) Events are unexpected; (b) You have caused something you didn't want to happen and cannot change it; (c) Circumstances have caused something you didn't want to happen; (d) You have caused something you didn't want to happen and are trying to change it; (e) Events are getting beyond your control"}], "sampled": ["(b) You have caused something you didn't want to happen and cannot change it."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:37.974504+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 177, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.48", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "b", "picked": null, "sampled": "(b) You have caused something you didn't want to happen and cannot change it.", "options": ["b"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:37.974551+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 178, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.4", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from four responses the most effective course of action to manage both the emotions the person is feeling and the problems they face in that situation. Although more than one course of action might be acceptable, you are asked to choose what you think the most effective response for that person in that situation would be. Remember, you are not necessarily choosing what you would do, or the nicest thing to do, but choosing the most effective response for that situation. Select one or more response(s) by returning the one or more corresponding lowercase letter(s) ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd'), and, if you selected more than one, sorting them, separated by hyphen, in the order that you think best ranks them from most to least effective, within the context of the vignette provided."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Wai-Hin and Connie have shared an office for years but Wai-Hin gets a new job and Connie loses contact with her. What action would be the most effective for Connie? (a) Just accept that she is gone and the friendship is over; (b) Ring Wai-Hin an ask her out for lunch or coffee to catch up; (c) Contact Wai-Hin and arrange to catch up but also make friends with her replacement; (d) Spend time getting to know the other people in the office, and strike up new friendships."}], "sampled": ["(b) Ring Wai-Hin and ask her out for lunch or coffee to catch up."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:38.219135+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 179, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.4", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "c-d", "picked": null, "sampled": "(b) Ring Wai-Hin and ask her out for lunch or coffee to catch up.", "options": ["c-d"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:38.219192+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 180, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.17", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from four responses the most effective course of action to manage both the emotions the person is feeling and the problems they face in that situation. Although more than one course of action might be acceptable, you are asked to choose what you think the most effective response for that person in that situation would be. Remember, you are not necessarily choosing what you would do, or the nicest thing to do, but choosing the most effective response for that situation. Select one or more response(s) by returning the one or more corresponding lowercase letter(s) ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd'), and, if you selected more than one, sorting them, separated by hyphen, in the order that you think best ranks them from most to least effective, within the context of the vignette provided."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A junior employee making routine adjustments to some of Teo's equipment accuses Teo of causing the equipment malfunction. What action would be the most effective for Teo? (a) Reprimand the employee for making such accusations; (b) Ignore the accusation, it is not important; (c) Explain that malfunctions were not his fault; (d) Learn more about using the equipment so that it doesn't break."}], "sampled": ["The most effective course of action for Teo would be to choose response (c) Explain that malfunctions were not his fault, and (d) Learn more about using the equipment so that it doesn't break. It is important for Teo to address the accusation and explain that he did not cause the malfunction. However, it is also important for Teo to take responsibility for learning more about the equipment to prevent future malfunctions."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:38.756762+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 181, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.17", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "b-c", "picked": null, "sampled": "The most effective course of action for Teo would be to choose response (c) Explain that malfunctions were not his fault, and (d) Learn more about using the equipment so that it doesn't break. It is important for Teo to address the accusation and explain that he did not cause the malfunction. However, it is also important for Teo to take responsibility for learning more about the equipment to prevent future malfunctions.", "options": ["b-c"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:38.756843+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 182, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.98", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from among four responses what you would be most likely to do in the situation. Please note, there are no right or wrong answers. We all deal with situations in different ways. All that you need to do is answer each question honestly. Select one or more response(s) by returning the one or more corresponding lowercase letter(s) ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd'), and, if you selected more than one, sorting them, separated by hyphen, in the order that you think best ranks them from most to least effective, within the context of the vignette provided."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You were always involved in soccer and are a very good player. You move to a new school in a community that has a lot of sports activities, but no soccer. You miss playing soccer, but are concerned about starting another sport. What would you do in this situation? (a) Talk to your parents and teachers about starting a soccer league in the new community; (b) Think about your skills and choose another sport that would use those skills (running or kicking); (c) Give up on sports; (d) Play pick-up games in an empty lot with a few friends after school"}], "sampled": ["a) Talk to your parents and teachers about starting a soccer league in the new community; b) Think about your skills and choose another sport that would use those skills (running or kicking)"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:39.102750+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 183, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.98", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "a-b-c-d", "picked": null, "sampled": "a) Talk to your parents and teachers about starting a soccer league in the new community; b) Think about your skills and choose another sport that would use those skills (running or kicking)", "options": ["a-b-c-d"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:39.102810+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 184, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.0", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from four responses the most effective course of action to manage both the emotions the person is feeling and the problems they face in that situation. Although more than one course of action might be acceptable, you are asked to choose what you think the most effective response for that person in that situation would be. Remember, you are not necessarily choosing what you would do, or the nicest thing to do, but choosing the most effective response for that situation. Select one or more response(s) by returning the one or more corresponding lowercase letter(s) ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd'), and, if you selected more than one, sorting them, separated by hyphen, in the order that you think best ranks them from most to least effective, within the context of the vignette provided."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Lee's workmate fails to deliver an important piece of information on time, causing Lee to fall behind schedule also. What action would be the most effective for Lee? (a) Work harder to compensate; (b) Get angry with the workmate; (c) Explain the urgency of the situation to the workmate; (d) Never rely on that workmate again."}], "sampled": ["The most effective course of action for Lee would be to (c) explain the urgency of the situation to the workmate. This would allow the workmate to understand the impact of their actions and hopefully prevent a similar situation from happening in the future. Option (a) may lead to burnout and is not a sustainable solution. Option (b) may damage the relationship with the workmate and create a negative work environment. Option (d) is not a productive solution and may limit Lee's ability to work effectively with others in the future."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:39.463872+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 185, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.0", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "c", "picked": null, "sampled": "The most effective course of action for Lee would be to (c) explain the urgency of the situation to the workmate. This would allow the workmate to understand the impact of their actions and hopefully prevent a similar situation from happening in the future. Option (a) may lead to burnout and is not a sustainable solution. Option (b) may damage the relationship with the workmate and create a negative work environment. Option (d) is not a productive solution and may limit Lee's ability to work effectively with others in the future.", "options": ["c"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:39.463919+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 186, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.99", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from among four responses what you would be most likely to do in the situation. Please note, there are no right or wrong answers. We all deal with situations in different ways. All that you need to do is answer each question honestly. Select one or more response(s) by returning the one or more corresponding lowercase letter(s) ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd'), and, if you selected more than one, sorting them, separated by hyphen, in the order that you think best ranks them from most to least effective, within the context of the vignette provided."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are given a warning by your teacher for having entered a restricted area. You were never informed that the area was restricted and will do detention if you get two more warnings, which you think is unfair. What would you do in this situation? (a) Explain that you didn't know the area was restricted; (b) Accept the warning and be careful not to go in the restricted area from now on; (c) Take a few deep breaths and calm down about the situation; (d) Spend a lot of time complaining to your friends about this"}], "sampled": ["a - Explain that you didn't know the area was restricted. b - Accept the warning and be careful not to go in the restricted area from now on. c - Take a few deep breaths and calm down about the situation. \n\nExplanation: It is important to explain your side of the story and clarify that you were not aware of the restricted area. However, it is also important to accept the warning and take responsibility for your actions. Taking deep breaths and calming down can help you approach the situation in a more rational manner. Complaining to friends may not be productive and may only increase negative emotions."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:42.139805+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 187, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.99", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "b-a-d-c", "picked": null, "sampled": "a - Explain that you didn't know the area was restricted. b - Accept the warning and be careful not to go in the restricted area from now on. c - Take a few deep breaths and calm down about the situation. \n\nExplanation: It is important to explain your side of the story and clarify that you were not aware of the restricted area. However, it is also important to accept the warning and take responsibility for your actions. Taking deep breaths and calming down can help you approach the situation in a more rational manner. Complaining to friends may not be productive and may only increase negative emotions.", "options": ["b-a-d-c"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:42.139862+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 188, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.13", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from four responses the most effective course of action to manage both the emotions the person is feeling and the problems they face in that situation. Although more than one course of action might be acceptable, you are asked to choose what you think the most effective response for that person in that situation would be. Remember, you are not necessarily choosing what you would do, or the nicest thing to do, but choosing the most effective response for that situation. Select one or more response(s) by returning the one or more corresponding lowercase letter(s) ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd'), and, if you selected more than one, sorting them, separated by hyphen, in the order that you think best ranks them from most to least effective, within the context of the vignette provided."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Katerina takes a long time to set the DVD timer. With the family watching, her sister says You idiot, you're doing it all wrong, can't you work the video?d Katerina is quite close to her sister and family. What action would be the most effective for Katerina? (a) Ignore her sister and keep at the task; (b) Get her sister to help or to do it; (c) Tell her sister she is being mean; (d) Never work appliances in front of her sister or family again."}], "sampled": ["(c) Tell her sister she is being mean; (b) Get her sister to help or to do it. \n\nIt is important to address the sister's hurtful comment and let her know that it is not acceptable to speak to Katerina in that way. This can help prevent similar situations from happening in the future. Additionally, asking for help or delegating the task to someone else can alleviate the pressure and stress Katerina may be feeling in the moment."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:42.201210+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 189, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.13", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "b-a-c", "picked": null, "sampled": "(c) Tell her sister she is being mean; (b) Get her sister to help or to do it. \n\nIt is important to address the sister's hurtful comment and let her know that it is not acceptable to speak to Katerina in that way. This can help prevent similar situations from happening in the future. Additionally, asking for help or delegating the task to someone else can alleviate the pressure and stress Katerina may be feeling in the moment.", "options": ["b-a-c"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:42.201268+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 190, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.20", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from four responses the most effective course of action to manage both the emotions the person is feeling and the problems they face in that situation. Although more than one course of action might be acceptable, you are asked to choose what you think the most effective response for that person in that situation would be. Remember, you are not necessarily choosing what you would do, or the nicest thing to do, but choosing the most effective response for that situation. Select one or more response(s) by returning the one or more corresponding lowercase letter(s) ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd'), and, if you selected more than one, sorting them, separated by hyphen, in the order that you think best ranks them from most to least effective, within the context of the vignette provided."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Upon entering full-time study, Vincent cannot afford the time or money he used to spend on water-polo training, which he was quite good at. Although he enjoys full-time study, he misses training. What action would be the most effective for Vincent? (a) Concentrate on studying hard, to pass his course; (b) See if there is a local league or a less expensive and less time-consuming sport; (c) Think deeply about whether sport or study is more important to him; (d) Find out about sporting scholarships or bursaries."}], "sampled": ["b) See if there is a local league or a less expensive and less time-consuming sport; d) Find out about sporting scholarships or bursaries. \n\nVincent is facing a dilemma between his passion for water-polo and his full-time study. Option (a) is not the most effective response because it does not address Vincent's emotional needs and may lead to burnout. Option (b) is a good response because it offers a compromise that allows Vincent to continue participating in sports while not compromising his studies. Option (c) is not the most effective response because it does not offer any practical solutions to Vincent's problem. Option (d) is also a good response because it offers a potential solution to Vincent's financial problem."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:42.638837+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 191, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.20", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "b-d-c", "picked": null, "sampled": "b) See if there is a local league or a less expensive and less time-consuming sport; d) Find out about sporting scholarships or bursaries. \n\nVincent is facing a dilemma between his passion for water-polo and his full-time study. Option (a) is not the most effective response because it does not address Vincent's emotional needs and may lead to burnout. Option (b) is a good response because it offers a compromise that allows Vincent to continue participating in sports while not compromising his studies. Option (c) is not the most effective response because it does not offer any practical solutions to Vincent's problem. Option (d) is also a good response because it offers a potential solution to Vincent's financial problem.", "options": ["b-d-c"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:42.638873+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 192, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.42", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from four responses the most effective course of action to manage both the emotions the person is feeling and the problems they face in that situation. Although more than one course of action might be acceptable, you are asked to choose what you think the most effective response for that person in that situation would be. Remember, you are not necessarily choosing what you would do, or the nicest thing to do, but choosing the most effective response for that situation. Select one or more response(s) by returning the one or more corresponding lowercase letter(s) ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd'), and, if you selected more than one, sorting them, separated by hyphen, in the order that you think best ranks them from most to least effective, within the context of the vignette provided."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Jacob is having a large family gathering to celebrate him moving into his new home. He wants the day to go smoothly and is a little nervous about it. What action would be the most effective for Jacob? (a) Talk to friends or relatives to ease his worries; (b) Try to calm down, perhaps go for a short walk or meditate; (c) Prepare ahead of time so he has everything he needs available; (d) Accept that things aren't going to be perfect but the family will understand."}], "sampled": ["Ranking: b, c, a, d\n\nThe most effective course of action for Jacob would be to try to calm down, perhaps go for a short walk or meditate. This will help him to relax and reduce his nervousness. The next best option would be to prepare ahead of time so he has everything he needs available, which will help him feel more in control of the situation. Talking to friends or relatives to ease his worries could also be helpful, but it may not be as effective as the first two options. Finally, accepting that things aren't going to be perfect but the family will understand is also a good option, but it may not be as proactive as the other options."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:43.797003+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 193, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.42", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "c-d-a-b", "picked": null, "sampled": "Ranking: b, c, a, d\n\nThe most effective course of action for Jacob would be to try to calm down, perhaps go for a short walk or meditate. This will help him to relax and reduce his nervousness. The next best option would be to prepare ahead of time so he has everything he needs available, which will help him feel more in control of the situation. Talking to friends or relatives to ease his worries could also be helpful, but it may not be as effective as the first two options. Finally, accepting that things aren't going to be perfect but the family will understand is also a good option, but it may not be as proactive as the other options.", "options": ["c-d-a-b"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:43.797063+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 194, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.11", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from four responses the most effective course of action to manage both the emotions the person is feeling and the problems they face in that situation. Although more than one course of action might be acceptable, you are asked to choose what you think the most effective response for that person in that situation would be. Remember, you are not necessarily choosing what you would do, or the nicest thing to do, but choosing the most effective response for that situation. Select one or more response(s) by returning the one or more corresponding lowercase letter(s) ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd'), and, if you selected more than one, sorting them, separated by hyphen, in the order that you think best ranks them from most to least effective, within the context of the vignette provided."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Helga's team has been performing very well. They receive poor-quality work from another team that they must incorporate into their own project. What action would be the most effective for Helga? (a) Don't worry about it; (b) Tell the other team they must re-do their work; (c) Tell the project manager about the situation; (d) Re-do the other team's work to get it up to scratch."}], "sampled": ["(c) Tell the project manager about the situation; (d) Re-do the other team's work to get it up to scratch. \n\nExplanation: \nOption (a) is not an effective response as it ignores the problem and does not address the emotions or the issue at hand. Option (b) may cause conflict and damage relationships between the teams, which could negatively impact the project. Option (c) is the most effective response as it involves bringing the issue to the attention of the project manager, who can then take appropriate action to address the problem. Option (d) is also an effective response as it ensures that the project is not negatively impacted by poor-quality work, but it should be done after informing the project manager."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:45.778175+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 195, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.11", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "c-b", "picked": null, "sampled": "(c) Tell the project manager about the situation; (d) Re-do the other team's work to get it up to scratch. \n\nExplanation: \nOption (a) is not an effective response as it ignores the problem and does not address the emotions or the issue at hand. Option (b) may cause conflict and damage relationships between the teams, which could negatively impact the project. Option (c) is the most effective response as it involves bringing the issue to the attention of the project manager, who can then take appropriate action to address the problem. Option (d) is also an effective response as it ensures that the project is not negatively impacted by poor-quality work, but it should be done after informing the project manager.", "options": ["c-b"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:45.778221+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 196, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.6", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from four responses the most effective course of action to manage both the emotions the person is feeling and the problems they face in that situation. Although more than one course of action might be acceptable, you are asked to choose what you think the most effective response for that person in that situation would be. Remember, you are not necessarily choosing what you would do, or the nicest thing to do, but choosing the most effective response for that situation. Select one or more response(s) by returning the one or more corresponding lowercase letter(s) ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd'), and, if you selected more than one, sorting them, separated by hyphen, in the order that you think best ranks them from most to least effective, within the context of the vignette provided."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Manual is only a few years from retirement when he finds out his position will no longer exist, although he will still have a job with a less prestigious role. What action would be the most effective for Manual? (a) Carefully consider his options and discuss it with his family; (b) Talk to his boss or the management about it; (c) Accept the situation, but still feel bitter about it; (d) Walk out of that job."}], "sampled": ["Response: (b) Talk to his boss or the management about it.\n\nExplanation: It is important for Manual to communicate with his boss or the management about the situation. He can express his concerns and ask for clarification about the new role and its responsibilities. This will help him understand the situation better and make an informed decision about his future. Option (a) is also a good choice, as it is important for Manual to carefully consider his options and discuss it with his family. However, this should be done after he has spoken to his boss or the management. Option (c) is not effective, as it will only lead to bitterness and negativity, which will not help Manual in any way. Option (d) is not a good choice, as it will only lead to unemployment and financial instability."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:47.042664+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 197, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.6", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "a-b", "picked": null, "sampled": "Response: (b) Talk to his boss or the management about it.\n\nExplanation: It is important for Manual to communicate with his boss or the management about the situation. He can express his concerns and ask for clarification about the new role and its responsibilities. This will help him understand the situation better and make an informed decision about his future. Option (a) is also a good choice, as it is important for Manual to carefully consider his options and discuss it with his family. However, this should be done after he has spoken to his boss or the management. Option (c) is not effective, as it will only lead to bitterness and negativity, which will not help Manual in any way. Option (d) is not a good choice, as it will only lead to unemployment and financial instability.", "options": ["a-b"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:47.042722+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 198, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.34", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from four responses the most effective course of action to manage both the emotions the person is feeling and the problems they face in that situation. Although more than one course of action might be acceptable, you are asked to choose what you think the most effective response for that person in that situation would be. Remember, you are not necessarily choosing what you would do, or the nicest thing to do, but choosing the most effective response for that situation. Select one or more response(s) by returning the one or more corresponding lowercase letter(s) ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd'), and, if you selected more than one, sorting them, separated by hyphen, in the order that you think best ranks them from most to least effective, within the context of the vignette provided."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Jerry has had several short-term jobs in the same industry, but is excited about starting a job in a different industry. His father casually remarks that he will probably last six months. What action would be the most effective for Jerry? (a) Tell his father he is completely wrong; (b) Prove him wrong by working hard to succeed at the new job; (c) Think of the positives of the new job; (d) Ignore his father's comments."}], "sampled": ["Ranking: c > b > d > a\n\nThe most effective course of action for Jerry would be to (c) think of the positives of the new job. This will help him focus on the good aspects of the new job and maintain a positive attitude towards it. It will also help him to not let his father's comments affect his confidence and motivation.\n\nThe next effective course of action would be to (b) prove him wrong by working hard to succeed at the new job. This will help Jerry to build his confidence and self-esteem, and also show his father that he is capable of succeeding in the new industry.\n\nThe third effective course of action would be to (d) ignore his father's comments. This will help Jerry to not let his father's negativity affect his mindset and motivation towards the new job.\n\nThe least effective course of action would be to (a) tell his father he is completely wrong. This may create conflict and tension between Jerry and his father, and may not necessarily change his father's opinion."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:48.230900+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418180208G7BAMXAO", "event_id": 199, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.34", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "d-b-c", "picked": null, "sampled": "Ranking: c > b > d > a\n\nThe most effective course of action for Jerry would be to (c) think of the positives of the new job. This will help him focus on the good aspects of the new job and maintain a positive attitude towards it. It will also help him to not let his father's comments affect his confidence and motivation.\n\nThe next effective course of action would be to (b) prove him wrong by working hard to succeed at the new job. This will help Jerry to build his confidence and self-esteem, and also show his father that he is capable of succeeding in the new industry.\n\nThe third effective course of action would be to (d) ignore his father's comments. This will help Jerry to not let his father's negativity affect his mindset and motivation towards the new job.\n\nThe least effective course of action would be to (a) tell his father he is completely wrong. This may create conflict and tension between Jerry and his father, and may not necessarily change his father's opinion.", "options": ["d-b-c"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:02:48.230960+00:00"}
-{"final_report": {"accuracy": 0.03}}
diff --git a/evals/emotional-intelligence/emotional-intelligence-turbo.jsonl b/evals/emotional-intelligence/emotional-intelligence-turbo.jsonl
deleted file mode 100644
index 37ecf5adffb30aae7ad683f4ef902bc74957db80..0000000000000000000000000000000000000000
--- a/evals/emotional-intelligence/emotional-intelligence-turbo.jsonl
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,202 +0,0 @@
-{"spec": {"completion_fns": ["gpt-3.5-turbo"], "eval_name": "emotional-intelligence.dev.v0", "base_eval": "emotional-intelligence", "split": "dev", "run_config": {"completion_fns": ["gpt-3.5-turbo"], "eval_spec": {"cls": "evals.elsuite.basic.match:Match", "args": {"samples_jsonl": "emotional-intelligence/samples.jsonl"}, "key": "emotional-intelligence.dev.v0", "group": "emotional-intelligence"}, "seed": 20220722, "max_samples": null, "command": "/Users/acabrera/dev-research/22-zeno/openai-eval/evals/evals/cli/oaieval.py gpt-3.5-turbo emotional-intelligence", "initial_settings": {"visible": true}}, "created_by": "", "run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:36.783611"}}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 0, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.64", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. The following questions each describe a situation, and ask you to choose which of five emotions is most likely to result from that situation. Here is an example: Clara receives a gift Clara is most likely to feel?  (a) happy (b) angry (c) frightened (d) bored (e) hungry. If you think Clara would feel happy, you would mark option A and then move to the next question. Select the most emotionally intelligent response by returning the one lowercase letter ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd') corresponding to that response."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Garry's small business is attracting less and less clients and he can't tell why. There doesn't seem to be anything he can do to help matters. Garry is most likely to feel? (a) Scared; (b) Angry; (c) Sad; (d) Guilty; (e) Distressed"}], "sampled": ["(c) Sad"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:37.638635+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 1, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.64", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "e", "picked": null, "sampled": "(c) Sad", "options": ["e"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:37.638683+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 2, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.50", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. The following questions each describe a situation, and ask you to choose which of five emotions is most likely to result from that situation. Here is an example: Clara receives a gift Clara is most likely to feel?  (a) happy (b) angry (c) frightened (d) bored (e) hungry. If you think Clara would feel happy, you would mark option A and then move to the next question. Select the most emotionally intelligent response by returning the one lowercase letter ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd') corresponding to that response."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Something unpleasant is happening. Neither the person involved, nor anyone else can make it stop. The person involved is most likely to feel? (a) Guilty; (b) Distressed; (c) Sad; (d) Scared; (e) Angry"}], "sampled": ["(b) Distressed."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:37.644968+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 3, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.50", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "b", "picked": null, "sampled": "(b) Distressed.", "options": ["b"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:37.645037+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 4, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.67", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. The following questions each describe a situation, and ask you to choose which of five emotions is most likely to result from that situation. Here is an example: Clara receives a gift Clara is most likely to feel?  (a) happy (b) angry (c) frightened (d) bored (e) hungry. If you think Clara would feel happy, you would mark option A and then move to the next question. Select the most emotionally intelligent response by returning the one lowercase letter ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd') corresponding to that response."}, {"role": "user", "content": "By their own actions, a person reaches a goal they wanted to reach. The person is most likely to feel? (a) Joy; (b) Hope; (c) Relief; (d) Pride; (e) Surprise"}], "sampled": ["(d) Pride."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:37.663812+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 5, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.67", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "d", "picked": null, "sampled": "(d) Pride.", "options": ["d"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:37.663846+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 6, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.29", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from four responses the most effective course of action to manage both the emotions the person is feeling and the problems they face in that situation. Although more than one course of action might be acceptable, you are asked to choose what you think the most effective response for that person in that situation would be. Remember, you are not necessarily choosing what you would do, or the nicest thing to do, but choosing the most effective response for that situation. Select one or more response(s) by returning the one or more corresponding lowercase letter(s) ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd'), and, if you selected more than one, sorting them, separated by hyphen, in the order that you think best ranks them from most to least effective, within the context of the vignette provided."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Billy is nervous about acting a scene when there are a lot of very experienced actors in the crowd. What action would be the most effective for Billy? (a) Put things in perspective 3 it is not the end of the world; (b) Use some acting techniques to clam his nerves; (c) Believe in himself and know it will be fine; (d) Practice his scenes more so that he will act well."}], "sampled": ["b-c-d"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:37.721422+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 7, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.29", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "b-d-a", "picked": null, "sampled": "b-c-d", "options": ["b-d-a"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:37.721456+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 8, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.75", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. The following questions each describe a situation, and ask you to choose which of five emotions is most likely to result from that situation. Here is an example: Clara receives a gift Clara is most likely to feel?  (a) happy (b) angry (c) frightened (d) bored (e) hungry. If you think Clara would feel happy, you would mark option A and then move to the next question. Select the most emotionally intelligent response by returning the one lowercase letter ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd') corresponding to that response."}, {"role": "user", "content": "By chance, a situation arises where there is the possibility that a person will get what they want. The person is most likely to feel? (a) Distress; (b) Hope; (c) Surprise; (d) Joy; (e) Fear"}], "sampled": ["(b) Hope."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:37.787338+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 9, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.75", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "b", "picked": null, "sampled": "(b) Hope.", "options": ["b"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:37.787399+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 10, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.87", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from among four responses what you would be most likely to do in the situation. Please note, there are no right or wrong answers. We all deal with situations in different ways. All that you need to do is answer each question honestly. Select the most emotionally intelligent response by returning the one lowercase letter ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd') corresponding to that response."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A man felt secure and accepted and later he felt depressed. What happened in between? (a) He received a compliment intended for someone else; (b) He discovered his wife was cheating on him; (c) A friend became ill; (d) A package he mailed to a friend was delivered to the wrong person; (e) He was frustrated by a bad job he did on a project"}], "sampled": ["(b) He discovered his wife was cheating on him."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:38.012034+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 11, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.87", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "b", "picked": null, "sampled": "(b) He discovered his wife was cheating on him.", "options": ["b"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:38.012105+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 12, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.60", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. The following questions each describe a situation, and ask you to choose which of five emotions is most likely to result from that situation. Here is an example: Clara receives a gift Clara is most likely to feel?  (a) happy (b) angry (c) frightened (d) bored (e) hungry. If you think Clara would feel happy, you would mark option A and then move to the next question. Select the most emotionally intelligent response by returning the one lowercase letter ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd') corresponding to that response."}, {"role": "user", "content": "If all goes well, then it's fairly likely that Derek's house will increase in value. Derek is most likely to feel? (a) Distress; (b) Fear; (c) Surprise; (d) Joy; (e) Hope"}], "sampled": ["(d) Joy"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:38.301006+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 13, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.60", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "e", "picked": null, "sampled": "(d) Joy", "options": ["e"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:38.301061+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 14, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.84", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. The following questions each describe a situation, and ask you to choose which of five emotions is most likely to result from that situation. Here is an example: Clara receives a gift Clara is most likely to feel?  (a) happy (b) angry (c) frightened (d) bored (e) hungry. If you think Clara would feel happy, you would mark option A and then move to the next question. Select the most emotionally intelligent response by returning the one lowercase letter ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd') corresponding to that response."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Matthew has been at his current job for six months. Something happened that caused him to feel regret. What is most likely to have happened? (a) He did not apply for a position he wanted, and has found out that someone else less qualified got the job; (b) He did not apply for a position he wanted, and has started looking for a similar position; (c) He found out that opportunities for promotion have dried up; (d) He found out that he didn't get a position he thought he would get; (e) He didn't hear about a position he could have applied for and now it is too late."}], "sampled": ["(d) He found out that he didn't get a position he thought he would get."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:38.456027+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 15, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.84", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "a", "picked": null, "sampled": "(d) He found out that he didn't get a position he thought he would get.", "options": ["a"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:38.456105+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 16, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.63", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. The following questions each describe a situation, and ask you to choose which of five emotions is most likely to result from that situation. Here is an example: Clara receives a gift Clara is most likely to feel?  (a) happy (b) angry (c) frightened (d) bored (e) hungry. If you think Clara would feel happy, you would mark option A and then move to the next question. Select the most emotionally intelligent response by returning the one lowercase letter ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd') corresponding to that response."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Mary was working at her desk. Something happened that caused her to feel surprised. What is most likely to have happened? (a) Her work-mate told a silly joke; (b) She was working on a new task she hadn't dealt with before; (c) She found some results that were different from what she thought they would be; (d) She realized she would not be able to complete her work; (e) She had to do a task she didn't normally do at work."}], "sampled": ["(c) She found some results that were different from what she thought they would be."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:38.464132+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 17, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.63", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "c", "picked": null, "sampled": "(c) She found some results that were different from what she thought they would be.", "options": ["c"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:38.464170+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 18, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.93", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from among four responses what you would be most likely to do in the situation. Please note, there are no right or wrong answers. We all deal with situations in different ways. All that you need to do is answer each question honestly. Select one or more response(s) by returning the one or more corresponding lowercase letter(s) ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd'), and, if you selected more than one, sorting them, separated by hyphen, in the order that you think best ranks them from most to least effective, within the context of the vignette provided."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You have not spoken to your favorite cousin for months, although you were both very close when you were younger. You phone your cousin but he/she can only talk for five minutes. What would you do in this situation? (a) Understand that relationships change, but call your cousin from time to time; (b) Make plans to drop by and visit your cousin in person and have a good chat; (c) Realize that your cousin is growing up and might not want to spend so much time with the family anymore; (d) Be upset about it, but realize there is nothing you can really do"}], "sampled": ["a) Understand that relationships change, but call your cousin from time to time."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:38.567804+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 19, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.93", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "a-b-c-d", "picked": null, "sampled": "a) Understand that relationships change, but call your cousin from time to time.", "options": ["a-b-c-d"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:38.567865+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 20, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.44", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. The following questions each describe a situation, and ask you to choose which of five emotions is most likely to result from that situation. Here is an example: Clara receives a gift Clara is most likely to feel?  (a) happy (b) angry (c) frightened (d) bored (e) hungry. If you think Clara would feel happy, you would mark option A and then move to the next question. Select the most emotionally intelligent response by returning the one lowercase letter ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd') corresponding to that response."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A pleasant experience ceases unexpectedly and there is not much that can be done about it. The person involved is most likely to feel? (a) Ashamed; (b) Distressed; (c) Angry; (d) Sad; (e) Frustrated"}], "sampled": ["(d) Sad"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:38.584386+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 21, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.44", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "d", "picked": null, "sampled": "(d) Sad", "options": ["d"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:38.584432+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 22, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.45", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. The following questions each describe a situation, and ask you to choose which of five emotions is most likely to result from that situation. Here is an example: Clara receives a gift Clara is most likely to feel?  (a) happy (b) angry (c) frightened (d) bored (e) hungry. If you think Clara would feel happy, you would mark option A and then move to the next question. Select the most emotionally intelligent response by returning the one lowercase letter ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd') corresponding to that response."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Xavier completes a difficult task on time and under budget. Xavier is most likely to feel? (a) Surprise; (b) Pride; (c) Relief; (d) Hope; (e) Joy"}], "sampled": ["(b) Pride."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:39.104255+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 23, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.45", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "b", "picked": null, "sampled": "(b) Pride.", "options": ["b"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:39.104313+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 24, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.85", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. The following questions each describe a situation, and ask you to choose which of five emotions is most likely to result from that situation. Here is an example: Clara receives a gift Clara is most likely to feel?  (a) happy (b) angry (c) frightened (d) bored (e) hungry. If you think Clara would feel happy, you would mark option A and then move to the next question. Select the most emotionally intelligent response by returning the one lowercase letter ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd') corresponding to that response."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Penny's hockey team trained hard and won the championship. Penny is most likely to feel? (a) Hope; (b) Pride; (c) Relief; (d) Joy; (e) Surprise"}], "sampled": ["(b) Pride"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:39.810623+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 25, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.85", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "b", "picked": null, "sampled": "(b) Pride", "options": ["b"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:39.810679+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 26, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.24", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from four responses the most effective course of action to manage both the emotions the person is feeling and the problems they face in that situation. Although more than one course of action might be acceptable, you are asked to choose what you think the most effective response for that person in that situation would be. Remember, you are not necessarily choosing what you would do, or the nicest thing to do, but choosing the most effective response for that situation. Select one or more response(s) by returning the one or more corresponding lowercase letter(s) ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd'), and, if you selected more than one, sorting them, separated by hyphen, in the order that you think best ranks them from most to least effective, within the context of the vignette provided."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Shona has not spoken to her nephew for months, whereas when he was younger they were very close. She rings him but he can only talk for five minutes. What action would be the most effective for Shona? (a) Realize that he is growing up and might not want to spend so much time with his family any more; (b) Make plans to drop by and visit him in person and have a good chat; (c) Understand that relationships change, but keep calling him from time to time; (d) Be upset about it, but realize there is nothing she can do."}], "sampled": ["(b) Make plans to drop by and visit him in person and have a good chat; (c) Understand that relationships change, but keep calling him from time to time."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:39.895503+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 27, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.24", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "c-b", "picked": null, "sampled": "(b) Make plans to drop by and visit him in person and have a good chat; (c) Understand that relationships change, but keep calling him from time to time.", "options": ["c-b"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:39.895580+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 28, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.28", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from four responses the most effective course of action to manage both the emotions the person is feeling and the problems they face in that situation. Although more than one course of action might be acceptable, you are asked to choose what you think the most effective response for that person in that situation would be. Remember, you are not necessarily choosing what you would do, or the nicest thing to do, but choosing the most effective response for that situation. Select one or more response(s) by returning the one or more corresponding lowercase letter(s) ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd'), and, if you selected more than one, sorting them, separated by hyphen, in the order that you think best ranks them from most to least effective, within the context of the vignette provided."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Mina and her sister-in-law normally get along quite well, and the sister-in-law regularly baby-sits for her for a small fee. Lately she has also been cleaning away cobwebs, commenting on the mess, which Mina finds insulting. What action would be the most effective for Mina? (a) Tell her sister-in-law these comments upset her; (b) Get a new babysitter; (c) Be grateful her house is being cleaned for free; (d) Tell her only to baby-sit, not to clean."}], "sampled": ["a-d. Mina should communicate with her sister-in-law and let her know that the comments are hurtful. She should also set boundaries and make it clear that she only wants her to babysit, not clean. This approach addresses the emotional issue and sets clear expectations for their relationship going forward."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:42.309494+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 29, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.28", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "a-c-d", "picked": null, "sampled": "a-d. Mina should communicate with her sister-in-law and let her know that the comments are hurtful. She should also set boundaries and make it clear that she only wants her to babysit, not clean. This approach addresses the emotional issue and sets clear expectations for their relationship going forward.", "options": ["a-c-d"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:42.309529+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 30, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.69", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. The following questions each describe a situation, and ask you to choose which of five emotions is most likely to result from that situation. Here is an example: Clara receives a gift Clara is most likely to feel?  (a) happy (b) angry (c) frightened (d) bored (e) hungry. If you think Clara would feel happy, you would mark option A and then move to the next question. Select the most emotionally intelligent response by returning the one lowercase letter ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd') corresponding to that response."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Hasad tries to use his new mobile phone. He has always been able to work out how to use different appliances, but he cannot get the phone to function. Hasad is most likely to feel? (a) Distressed; (b) Confused; (c) Surprised; (d) Relieved; (e) Frustrated"}], "sampled": ["(e) Frustrated."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:43.128670+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 31, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.69", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "e", "picked": null, "sampled": "(e) Frustrated.", "options": ["e"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:43.128703+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 32, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.74", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. The following questions each describe a situation, and ask you to choose which of five emotions is most likely to result from that situation. Here is an example: Clara receives a gift Clara is most likely to feel?  (a) happy (b) angry (c) frightened (d) bored (e) hungry. If you think Clara would feel happy, you would mark option A and then move to the next question. Select the most emotionally intelligent response by returning the one lowercase letter ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd') corresponding to that response."}, {"role": "user", "content": "It is clear that somebody will get what they want. They are most likely to feel? (a) Pride; (b) Relief; (c) Joy; (d) Hope; (e) Guilt"}], "sampled": ["(b) Relief."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:43.734395+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 33, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.74", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "c", "picked": null, "sampled": "(b) Relief.", "options": ["c"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:43.734483+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 34, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.9", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from four responses the most effective course of action to manage both the emotions the person is feeling and the problems they face in that situation. Although more than one course of action might be acceptable, you are asked to choose what you think the most effective response for that person in that situation would be. Remember, you are not necessarily choosing what you would do, or the nicest thing to do, but choosing the most effective response for that situation. Select one or more response(s) by returning the one or more corresponding lowercase letter(s) ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd'), and, if you selected more than one, sorting them, separated by hyphen, in the order that you think best ranks them from most to least effective, within the context of the vignette provided."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Darla is nervous about presenting her work to a group of seniors who might not understand it, as they don't know much about her area. What action would be the most effective for Darla? (a) Be positive and confident, knowing it will go well; (b) Just give the presentation; (c) Work on her presentation, simplifying the explanations; (d) Practice presenting to laypeople such as friends or family."}], "sampled": ["c-d. The most effective course of action for Darla would be to work on her presentation, simplifying the explanations, as this would help her to communicate her work more effectively to the seniors. Additionally, practicing presenting to laypeople such as friends or family would help her gain confidence and prepare for the presentation. While being positive and confident is important, it may not be enough to address the specific concerns Darla has about the seniors not understanding her work. Just giving the presentation without making any changes to her approach may not be effective in achieving her goal of communicating her work to the seniors."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:44.153377+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 35, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.9", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "c-d", "picked": "c-d", "sampled": "c-d. The most effective course of action for Darla would be to work on her presentation, simplifying the explanations, as this would help her to communicate her work more effectively to the seniors. Additionally, practicing presenting to laypeople such as friends or family would help her gain confidence and prepare for the presentation. While being positive and confident is important, it may not be enough to address the specific concerns Darla has about the seniors not understanding her work. Just giving the presentation without making any changes to her approach may not be effective in achieving her goal of communicating her work to the seniors.", "options": ["c-d"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:44.153451+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 36, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.54", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. The following questions each describe a situation, and ask you to choose which of five emotions is most likely to result from that situation. Here is an example: Clara receives a gift Clara is most likely to feel?  (a) happy (b) angry (c) frightened (d) bored (e) hungry. If you think Clara would feel happy, you would mark option A and then move to the next question. Select the most emotionally intelligent response by returning the one lowercase letter ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd') corresponding to that response."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Leya works as a trouble-shooter. She is presented with a standard looking problem but cannot work out how to solve it. Leya is most likely to feel? (a) Confused; (b) Frustrated; (c) Surprised; (d) Relieved; (e) Distressed"}], "sampled": ["(a) Confused."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:44.363473+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 37, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.54", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "b", "picked": null, "sampled": "(a) Confused.", "options": ["b"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:44.363509+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 38, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.7", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from four responses the most effective course of action to manage both the emotions the person is feeling and the problems they face in that situation. Although more than one course of action might be acceptable, you are asked to choose what you think the most effective response for that person in that situation would be. Remember, you are not necessarily choosing what you would do, or the nicest thing to do, but choosing the most effective response for that situation. Select one or more response(s) by returning the one or more corresponding lowercase letter(s) ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd'), and, if you selected more than one, sorting them, separated by hyphen, in the order that you think best ranks them from most to least effective, within the context of the vignette provided."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Alan helps Trudy, a peer he works with occasionally, with a difficult task. Trudy complains that Alan's work isn't very good, and Alan responds that Trudy should be grateful he is doing her a favor. They argue. What action would be the most effective for Alan? (a) Stop helping Trudy and don't help her again; (b) Try harder to help appropriately; (c) Apologize to Trudy; (d) Diffuse the argument by asking for advice."}], "sampled": ["Option (b) Try harder to help appropriately would be the most effective for Alan. Alan should try to understand Trudy's concerns and work on improving his work to meet her expectations. This will not only help diffuse the argument but also improve their working relationship. Option (a) Stop helping Trudy and don't help her again would not be effective as it would not address the underlying issue and may harm their working relationship. Option (c) Apologize to Trudy may be effective if Alan's work was indeed subpar, but it may not address the root cause of the argument. Option (d) Diffuse the argument by asking for advice may not be effective as it may not address the underlying issue and may come across as insincere."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:44.797448+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 39, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.7", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "d-a-b-c", "picked": null, "sampled": "Option (b) Try harder to help appropriately would be the most effective for Alan. Alan should try to understand Trudy's concerns and work on improving his work to meet her expectations. This will not only help diffuse the argument but also improve their working relationship. Option (a) Stop helping Trudy and don't help her again would not be effective as it would not address the underlying issue and may harm their working relationship. Option (c) Apologize to Trudy may be effective if Alan's work was indeed subpar, but it may not address the root cause of the argument. Option (d) Diffuse the argument by asking for advice may not be effective as it may not address the underlying issue and may come across as insincere.", "options": ["d-a-b-c"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:44.797509+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 40, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.46", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. The following questions each describe a situation, and ask you to choose which of five emotions is most likely to result from that situation. Here is an example: Clara receives a gift Clara is most likely to feel?  (a) happy (b) angry (c) frightened (d) bored (e) hungry. If you think Clara would feel happy, you would mark option A and then move to the next question. Select the most emotionally intelligent response by returning the one lowercase letter ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd') corresponding to that response."}, {"role": "user", "content": "An irritating neighbor of Eve's moves to another state. Eve is most likely to feel? (a) Regret; (b) Hope; (c) Relief; (d) Sadness; (e) Joy"}], "sampled": ["(c) Relief."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:45.279522+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 41, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.46", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "c", "picked": null, "sampled": "(c) Relief.", "options": ["c"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:45.279567+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 42, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.1", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from four responses the most effective course of action to manage both the emotions the person is feeling and the problems they face in that situation. Although more than one course of action might be acceptable, you are asked to choose what you think the most effective response for that person in that situation would be. Remember, you are not necessarily choosing what you would do, or the nicest thing to do, but choosing the most effective response for that situation. Select one or more response(s) by returning the one or more corresponding lowercase letter(s) ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd'), and, if you selected more than one, sorting them, separated by hyphen, in the order that you think best ranks them from most to least effective, within the context of the vignette provided."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Rhea has left her job to be a full-time mother, which she loves, but she misses the company and companionship of her workmates. What action would be the most effective for Rhea? (a) Enjoy being a full-time mom; (b) Try to see her old workmates socially, inviting them out; (c) Join a playgroup or social group of new mothers; (d) See if she can find part time work."}], "sampled": ["Ranking: c > b > a > d\n\nExplanation: While enjoying being a full-time mom is important, Rhea is experiencing a specific problem of missing the company and companionship of her workmates. Therefore, it would be most effective for her to join a playgroup or social group of new mothers to meet new people who are in a similar situation. Trying to see her old workmates socially is also a good option, but it may not be possible if they are busy with work. Enjoying being a full-time mom is important, but it does not address the specific problem Rhea is facing. Seeing if she can find part-time work may not be the best option if she wants to continue being a full-time mom."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:45.524383+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 43, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.1", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "c-b-d", "picked": null, "sampled": "Ranking: c > b > a > d\n\nExplanation: While enjoying being a full-time mom is important, Rhea is experiencing a specific problem of missing the company and companionship of her workmates. Therefore, it would be most effective for her to join a playgroup or social group of new mothers to meet new people who are in a similar situation. Trying to see her old workmates socially is also a good option, but it may not be possible if they are busy with work. Enjoying being a full-time mom is important, but it does not address the specific problem Rhea is facing. Seeing if she can find part-time work may not be the best option if she wants to continue being a full-time mom.", "options": ["c-b-d"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:45.524436+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 44, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.3", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from four responses the most effective course of action to manage both the emotions the person is feeling and the problems they face in that situation. Although more than one course of action might be acceptable, you are asked to choose what you think the most effective response for that person in that situation would be. Remember, you are not necessarily choosing what you would do, or the nicest thing to do, but choosing the most effective response for that situation. Select one or more response(s) by returning the one or more corresponding lowercase letter(s) ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd'), and, if you selected more than one, sorting them, separated by hyphen, in the order that you think best ranks them from most to least effective, within the context of the vignette provided."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Mario is showing Min, a new employee, how the system works. Mario's boss walks by and announces Mario is wrong about several points, as changes have been made. Mario gets on well with his boss, although they don't normally have much to do with each other. What action would be the most effective for Mario? (a) Make a joke to Min, explaining he didn't know about the changes; (b) Not worry about it, just ignore the interruption; (c) Learn the new changes; (d) Tell the boss that such criticism was inappropriate."}], "sampled": ["Response: (c) Learn the new changes. \n\nExplanation: In this situation, the most effective course of action for Mario would be to learn the new changes. This would help him to correct any mistakes he made while showing Min how the system works. Ignoring the interruption (b) or making a joke (a) might not be the best course of action, as it could make Mario appear unprofessional or uninterested in his job. While telling the boss that such criticism was inappropriate (d) might be tempting, it could damage Mario's relationship with his boss and create unnecessary conflict. Therefore, the best course of action for Mario would be to learn the new changes and correct any mistakes he made while showing Min how the system works."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:45.709769+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 45, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.3", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "a-d-c", "picked": null, "sampled": "Response: (c) Learn the new changes. \n\nExplanation: In this situation, the most effective course of action for Mario would be to learn the new changes. This would help him to correct any mistakes he made while showing Min how the system works. Ignoring the interruption (b) or making a joke (a) might not be the best course of action, as it could make Mario appear unprofessional or uninterested in his job. While telling the boss that such criticism was inappropriate (d) might be tempting, it could damage Mario's relationship with his boss and create unnecessary conflict. Therefore, the best course of action for Mario would be to learn the new changes and correct any mistakes he made while showing Min how the system works.", "options": ["a-d-c"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:45.709828+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 46, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.12", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from four responses the most effective course of action to manage both the emotions the person is feeling and the problems they face in that situation. Although more than one course of action might be acceptable, you are asked to choose what you think the most effective response for that person in that situation would be. Remember, you are not necessarily choosing what you would do, or the nicest thing to do, but choosing the most effective response for that situation. Select one or more response(s) by returning the one or more corresponding lowercase letter(s) ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd'), and, if you selected more than one, sorting them, separated by hyphen, in the order that you think best ranks them from most to least effective, within the context of the vignette provided."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Clayton has been overseas for a long time and returns to visit his family. So much has changed that Clayton feels left out. What action would be the most effective for Clayton? (a) Nothing 3 it will sort itself out soon enough; (b) Tell his family he feels left out; (c) Spend time listening and getting involved again; (d) Reflect that relationships can change with time."}], "sampled": ["Response (c) Spend time listening and getting involved again would be the most effective for Clayton. It would help him reconnect with his family and feel less left out. Response (b) Tell his family he feels left out could also be effective, but it might come across as confrontational and cause tension. Response (d) Reflect that relationships can change with time might be helpful for Clayton to understand the situation, but it doesn't address the problem directly. Response (a) Nothing - it will sort itself out soon enough is not an effective response as it ignores the problem and doesn't offer any solution. Therefore, the ranking would be: (c) > (b) > (d) > (a)."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:46.098684+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 47, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.12", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "c-b-d", "picked": null, "sampled": "Response (c) Spend time listening and getting involved again would be the most effective for Clayton. It would help him reconnect with his family and feel less left out. Response (b) Tell his family he feels left out could also be effective, but it might come across as confrontational and cause tension. Response (d) Reflect that relationships can change with time might be helpful for Clayton to understand the situation, but it doesn't address the problem directly. Response (a) Nothing - it will sort itself out soon enough is not an effective response as it ignores the problem and doesn't offer any solution. Therefore, the ranking would be: (c) > (b) > (d) > (a).", "options": ["c-b-d"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:46.098727+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 48, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.83", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. The following questions each describe a situation, and ask you to choose which of five emotions is most likely to result from that situation. Here is an example: Clara receives a gift Clara is most likely to feel?  (a) happy (b) angry (c) frightened (d) bored (e) hungry. If you think Clara would feel happy, you would mark option A and then move to the next question. Select the most emotionally intelligent response by returning the one lowercase letter ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd') corresponding to that response."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Pete gets home late, after his favorite TV show has ended. Pete's partner has taped the show for him. Pete is most likely to feel? (a) Surprise; (b) Hope; (c) Pride; (d) Relief; (e) Gratitude"}], "sampled": ["(e) Gratitude."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:46.405924+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 49, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.83", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "c-e", "picked": null, "sampled": "(e) Gratitude.", "options": ["c-e"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:46.405981+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 50, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.22", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from four responses the most effective course of action to manage both the emotions the person is feeling and the problems they face in that situation. Although more than one course of action might be acceptable, you are asked to choose what you think the most effective response for that person in that situation would be. Remember, you are not necessarily choosing what you would do, or the nicest thing to do, but choosing the most effective response for that situation. Select one or more response(s) by returning the one or more corresponding lowercase letter(s) ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd'), and, if you selected more than one, sorting them, separated by hyphen, in the order that you think best ranks them from most to least effective, within the context of the vignette provided."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Greg has just gone back to university after a lapse of several years. He is surrounded by younger students who seem very confident about their ability and he is unsure whether he can compete with them. What action would be the most effective for Greg? (a) Focus on his life outside the university; (b) Study hard and attend all lectures; (c) Talk to others in his situation; (d) Realize he is better than the younger students as he has more life experience."}], "sampled": ["Ranking: b-c-a-d\n\nExplanation: \n(a) Focusing on his life outside the university may provide temporary relief, but it does not address the underlying issue of Greg's lack of confidence in his ability to compete with younger students. \n(b) Studying hard and attending all lectures is a proactive approach that can help Greg improve his skills and knowledge, and boost his confidence. \n(c) Talking to others in his situation can help Greg realize that he is not alone in feeling unsure and can provide him with support and advice. \n(d) Realizing he is better than the younger students due to his life experience may provide a temporary confidence boost, but it is not a sustainable solution and may lead to complacency."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:46.515421+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 51, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.22", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "c-b", "picked": null, "sampled": "Ranking: b-c-a-d\n\nExplanation: \n(a) Focusing on his life outside the university may provide temporary relief, but it does not address the underlying issue of Greg's lack of confidence in his ability to compete with younger students. \n(b) Studying hard and attending all lectures is a proactive approach that can help Greg improve his skills and knowledge, and boost his confidence. \n(c) Talking to others in his situation can help Greg realize that he is not alone in feeling unsure and can provide him with support and advice. \n(d) Realizing he is better than the younger students due to his life experience may provide a temporary confidence boost, but it is not a sustainable solution and may lead to complacency.", "options": ["c-b"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:46.515475+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 52, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.96", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from among four responses what you would be most likely to do in the situation. Please note, there are no right or wrong answers. We all deal with situations in different ways. All that you need to do is answer each question honestly. Select one or more response(s) by returning the one or more corresponding lowercase letter(s) ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd'), and, if you selected more than one, sorting them, separated by hyphen, in the order that you think best ranks them from most to least effective, within the context of the vignette provided."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are very excited about starting a new club. Then a family member remarks that the club will probably only last six weeks. What would you do in this situation? (a) Ignore the family member's comments; (b) Prove your family member wrong but doing everything you can to have fun and succeed at the new club; (c) Discuss with the family member how this club might be different than past clubs you were involved in; (d) Tell your family member he/she is wrong"}], "sampled": ["I would choose response (c) and (b) in that order. \n\n(c) Discuss with the family member how this club might be different than past clubs you were involved in: This response shows emotional intelligence by acknowledging the family member's concerns and engaging in a conversation to address them. It also allows for an opportunity to share your excitement and plans for the club, potentially changing their perspective.\n\n(b) Prove your family member wrong but doing everything you can to have fun and succeed at the new club: This response shows resilience and determination to succeed despite the negative comment. It can also serve as a way to prove to yourself that you are capable of achieving your goals."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:46.729189+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 53, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.96", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "c-b-a-d", "picked": null, "sampled": "I would choose response (c) and (b) in that order. \n\n(c) Discuss with the family member how this club might be different than past clubs you were involved in: This response shows emotional intelligence by acknowledging the family member's concerns and engaging in a conversation to address them. It also allows for an opportunity to share your excitement and plans for the club, potentially changing their perspective.\n\n(b) Prove your family member wrong but doing everything you can to have fun and succeed at the new club: This response shows resilience and determination to succeed despite the negative comment. It can also serve as a way to prove to yourself that you are capable of achieving your goals.", "options": ["c-b-a-d"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:46.729232+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 54, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.82", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. The following questions each describe a situation, and ask you to choose which of five emotions is most likely to result from that situation. Here is an example: Clara receives a gift Clara is most likely to feel?  (a) happy (b) angry (c) frightened (d) bored (e) hungry. If you think Clara would feel happy, you would mark option A and then move to the next question. Select the most emotionally intelligent response by returning the one lowercase letter ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd') corresponding to that response."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Someone believes that another person has caused harm to them, due to that person's bad character. They think they can probably handle the situation though. The harmed person is most likely to feel? (a) Contempt; (b) Anger; (c) Horror; (d) Excitement; (e) Shame"}], "sampled": ["(b) Anger."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:46.778518+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 55, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.82", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "a", "picked": null, "sampled": "(b) Anger.", "options": ["a"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:46.778552+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 56, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.91", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from among four responses what you would be most likely to do in the situation. Please note, there are no right or wrong answers. We all deal with situations in different ways. All that you need to do is answer each question honestly. Select one or more response(s) by returning the one or more corresponding lowercase letter(s) ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd'), and, if you selected more than one, sorting them, separated by hyphen, in the order that you think best ranks them from most to least effective, within the context of the vignette provided."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You move to a new community away from all your friends. You find that your friends make less of an effort to keep in contact with you than you thought they would. What would you do in this situation? (a) Make the effort to contact them, but also meet people in your new community; (b) Get involved in community events like sports or fund-raisers; (c) Let go of your old friends, who seem to be losers; (d) Try to tell your old friends how you feel"}], "sampled": ["a) Make the effort to contact them, but also meet people in your new community."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:46.923360+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 57, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.91", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "a-b-d-c", "picked": null, "sampled": "a) Make the effort to contact them, but also meet people in your new community.", "options": ["a-b-d-c"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:46.923437+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 58, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.81", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. The following questions each describe a situation, and ask you to choose which of five emotions is most likely to result from that situation. Here is an example: Clara receives a gift Clara is most likely to feel?  (a) happy (b) angry (c) frightened (d) bored (e) hungry. If you think Clara would feel happy, you would mark option A and then move to the next question. Select the most emotionally intelligent response by returning the one lowercase letter ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd') corresponding to that response."}, {"role": "user", "content": "The new manager at Enid's work changes everyone's hours to a less flexible work pattern, leaving no room for discussion. Enid is most likely to feel? (a) Dislike; (b) Rage; (c) Jealousy; (d) Surprise; (e) Anxiety"}], "sampled": ["(a) Dislike"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:47.428247+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 59, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.81", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "a", "picked": null, "sampled": "(a) Dislike", "options": ["a"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:47.428288+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 60, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.47", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. The following questions each describe a situation, and ask you to choose which of five emotions is most likely to result from that situation. Here is an example: Clara receives a gift Clara is most likely to feel?  (a) happy (b) angry (c) frightened (d) bored (e) hungry. If you think Clara would feel happy, you would mark option A and then move to the next question. Select the most emotionally intelligent response by returning the one lowercase letter ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd') corresponding to that response."}, {"role": "user", "content": "There is great weather on the day Jill is going on an out-door picnic. Jill is most likely to feel? (a) Pride; (b) Joy; (c) Relief; (d) Guilt; (e) Hope"}], "sampled": ["(b) Joy"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:47.460735+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 61, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.47", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "b", "picked": null, "sampled": "(b) Joy", "options": ["b"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:47.460769+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 62, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.56", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. The following questions each describe a situation, and ask you to choose which of five emotions is most likely to result from that situation. Here is an example: Clara receives a gift Clara is most likely to feel?  (a) happy (b) angry (c) frightened (d) bored (e) hungry. If you think Clara would feel happy, you would mark option A and then move to the next question. Select the most emotionally intelligent response by returning the one lowercase letter ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd') corresponding to that response."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Rashid needs to meet a quota before his performance review. There is only a small change that he will be able to do so and there isn't much he can do to improve the outcome. Rashid is most likely to feel? (a) Irritated; (b) Scared; (c) Distressed; (d) Sad; (e) Hopeful"}], "sampled": ["(d) Sad"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:47.597977+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 63, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.56", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "b", "picked": null, "sampled": "(d) Sad", "options": ["b"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:47.598016+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 64, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.95", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from among four responses what you would be most likely to do in the situation. Please note, there are no right or wrong answers. We all deal with situations in different ways. All that you need to do is answer each question honestly. Select one or more response(s) by returning the one or more corresponding lowercase letter(s) ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd'), and, if you selected more than one, sorting them, separated by hyphen, in the order that you think best ranks them from most to least effective, within the context of the vignette provided."}, {"role": "user", "content": "After school, you usually go to the mall with a really good friend. When your friend's family moves to a different part of town, your friend stops coming to the mall. You miss these times. What would you do in this situation? (a) Get your friend to meet you at the mall even if it's not convenient for her; (b) Go to the mall and hang out with other people; (c) Suggest other activities you and your friend could do together even if they occur less often; (d) Never talk to your friend again"}], "sampled": ["(c) Suggest other activities you and your friend could do together even if they occur less often; (b) Go to the mall and hang out with other people."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:49.619283+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 65, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.95", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "d-b-a-c", "picked": null, "sampled": "(c) Suggest other activities you and your friend could do together even if they occur less often; (b) Go to the mall and hang out with other people.", "options": ["d-b-a-c"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:49.619322+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 66, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.10", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from four responses the most effective course of action to manage both the emotions the person is feeling and the problems they face in that situation. Although more than one course of action might be acceptable, you are asked to choose what you think the most effective response for that person in that situation would be. Remember, you are not necessarily choosing what you would do, or the nicest thing to do, but choosing the most effective response for that situation. Select one or more response(s) by returning the one or more corresponding lowercase letter(s) ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd'), and, if you selected more than one, sorting them, separated by hyphen, in the order that you think best ranks them from most to least effective, within the context of the vignette provided."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Andre moves away from the city his friends and family are in. He finds his friends make less effort to keep in contact than he thought they would. What action would be the most effective for Andre? (a) Try to adjust to life in the new city by joining clubs and activities there; (b) He should make the effort to contact them, but also try to meet people in his new city; (c) Let go of his old friends, who have shown themselves to be unreliable; (d) Tell his friends he is disappointed in them for not contacting him."}], "sampled": ["Response: (b) He should make the effort to contact them, but also try to meet people in his new city.\n\nExplanation: It is understandable that Andre feels disappointed that his friends are not making an effort to keep in touch. However, it is important for him to take the initiative to contact them as well. It is possible that his friends are busy with their own lives and may not realize how much their lack of contact is affecting Andre. At the same time, Andre should also try to meet new people in his new city by joining clubs and activities. This will help him adjust to his new environment and potentially make new friends. Option (a) is also a good choice, but it is important for Andre to maintain contact with his old friends as well. Option (c) may be too extreme, as it is possible that his friends may still be valuable to him in the future. Option (d) may come across as confrontational and may damage his relationship with his friends."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:50.194241+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 67, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.10", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "b", "picked": null, "sampled": "Response: (b) He should make the effort to contact them, but also try to meet people in his new city.\n\nExplanation: It is understandable that Andre feels disappointed that his friends are not making an effort to keep in touch. However, it is important for him to take the initiative to contact them as well. It is possible that his friends are busy with their own lives and may not realize how much their lack of contact is affecting Andre. At the same time, Andre should also try to meet new people in his new city by joining clubs and activities. This will help him adjust to his new environment and potentially make new friends. Option (a) is also a good choice, but it is important for Andre to maintain contact with his old friends as well. Option (c) may be too extreme, as it is possible that his friends may still be valuable to him in the future. Option (d) may come across as confrontational and may damage his relationship with his friends.", "options": ["b"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:50.194271+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 68, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.14", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from four responses the most effective course of action to manage both the emotions the person is feeling and the problems they face in that situation. Although more than one course of action might be acceptable, you are asked to choose what you think the most effective response for that person in that situation would be. Remember, you are not necessarily choosing what you would do, or the nicest thing to do, but choosing the most effective response for that situation. Select one or more response(s) by returning the one or more corresponding lowercase letter(s) ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd'), and, if you selected more than one, sorting them, separated by hyphen, in the order that you think best ranks them from most to least effective, within the context of the vignette provided."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Benjiro's parents are in their late 80s and living interstate in a house by themselves. He is worried that they need some help but they angrily deny it any time he brings up the subject. What action would be the most effective for Benjiro? (a) Visit frequently and get others to check on them; (b) Believe his parents' claims that they are fine; (c) Keep telling his parents his concerns, stressing their importance; (d) Force his parents to move into a home."}], "sampled": ["The most effective course of action for Benjiro would be:\n\n(a) Visit frequently and get others to check on them.\n\nThis way, Benjiro can keep an eye on his parents and ensure that they are safe and healthy. Additionally, by involving others, he can get a second opinion on their well-being and make sure that they are receiving the care they need. It is important to respect his parents' wishes, but also to ensure their safety. \n\n(c) Keep telling his parents his concerns, stressing their importance.\n\nWhile it is important to respect his parents' wishes, it is also important to communicate his concerns to them. By stressing the importance of their well-being, he may be able to convince them to accept help. However, this should be done in a respectful and non-confrontational manner. \n\n(b) Believe his parents' claims that they are fine.\n\nWhile it is important to respect his parents' wishes, it is also important to ensure their safety. Simply believing their claims that they are fine may not be the most effective course of action. \n\n(d) Force his parents to move into a home.\n\nForcing his parents to move into a home would likely cause unnecessary stress and strain on their relationship. It is important to respect their wishes and autonomy as much as possible."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:51.493390+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 69, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.14", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "a-b-c", "picked": null, "sampled": "The most effective course of action for Benjiro would be:\n\n(a) Visit frequently and get others to check on them.\n\nThis way, Benjiro can keep an eye on his parents and ensure that they are safe and healthy. Additionally, by involving others, he can get a second opinion on their well-being and make sure that they are receiving the care they need. It is important to respect his parents' wishes, but also to ensure their safety. \n\n(c) Keep telling his parents his concerns, stressing their importance.\n\nWhile it is important to respect his parents' wishes, it is also important to communicate his concerns to them. By stressing the importance of their well-being, he may be able to convince them to accept help. However, this should be done in a respectful and non-confrontational manner. \n\n(b) Believe his parents' claims that they are fine.\n\nWhile it is important to respect his parents' wishes, it is also important to ensure their safety. Simply believing their claims that they are fine may not be the most effective course of action. \n\n(d) Force his parents to move into a home.\n\nForcing his parents to move into a home would likely cause unnecessary stress and strain on their relationship. It is important to respect their wishes and autonomy as much as possible.", "options": ["a-b-c"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:51.493426+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 70, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.73", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. The following questions each describe a situation, and ask you to choose which of five emotions is most likely to result from that situation. Here is an example: Clara receives a gift Clara is most likely to feel?  (a) happy (b) angry (c) frightened (d) bored (e) hungry. If you think Clara would feel happy, you would mark option A and then move to the next question. Select the most emotionally intelligent response by returning the one lowercase letter ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd') corresponding to that response."}, {"role": "user", "content": "An upcoming event might have bad consequences. Nothing much can be done to alter this. The person involved would be most likely to feel? (a) Sad; (b) Irritated; (c) Distressed; (d) Scared; (e) Hopeful"}], "sampled": ["(d) Scared."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:52.135266+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 71, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.73", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "d", "picked": null, "sampled": "(d) Scared.", "options": ["d"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:52.135301+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 72, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.35", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from four responses the most effective course of action to manage both the emotions the person is feeling and the problems they face in that situation. Although more than one course of action might be acceptable, you are asked to choose what you think the most effective response for that person in that situation would be. Remember, you are not necessarily choosing what you would do, or the nicest thing to do, but choosing the most effective response for that situation. Select one or more response(s) by returning the one or more corresponding lowercase letter(s) ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd'), and, if you selected more than one, sorting them, separated by hyphen, in the order that you think best ranks them from most to least effective, within the context of the vignette provided."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Michelle's friend Dara is moving overseas to live with her partner. They have been good friends for many years and Dara is unlikely to come back. What action would be the most effective for Michelle? (a) Forget about Dara; (b) Spend time with other friends, keeping herself busy; (c) Think that Dara and her partner will return soon; (d) Make sure she keeps in contact through email, phone or letter writing."}], "sampled": ["The most effective course of action for Michelle would be (d) Make sure she keeps in contact through email, phone or letter writing. This will help Michelle maintain her friendship with Dara despite the distance and time difference. It will also help her cope with the loss of her friend by staying connected and updated with her life. Option (a) is not effective as it suggests that Michelle should forget about her friend, which is not a healthy way to deal with the situation. Option (b) may be helpful in the short term, but it does not address the issue of maintaining the friendship. Option (c) is not effective as it is not realistic to assume that Dara and her partner will return soon."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:52.186326+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 73, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.35", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "d-b", "picked": null, "sampled": "The most effective course of action for Michelle would be (d) Make sure she keeps in contact through email, phone or letter writing. This will help Michelle maintain her friendship with Dara despite the distance and time difference. It will also help her cope with the loss of her friend by staying connected and updated with her life. Option (a) is not effective as it suggests that Michelle should forget about her friend, which is not a healthy way to deal with the situation. Option (b) may be helpful in the short term, but it does not address the issue of maintaining the friendship. Option (c) is not effective as it is not realistic to assume that Dara and her partner will return soon.", "options": ["d-b"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:52.186370+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 74, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.32", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from four responses the most effective course of action to manage both the emotions the person is feeling and the problems they face in that situation. Although more than one course of action might be acceptable, you are asked to choose what you think the most effective response for that person in that situation would be. Remember, you are not necessarily choosing what you would do, or the nicest thing to do, but choosing the most effective response for that situation. Select one or more response(s) by returning the one or more corresponding lowercase letter(s) ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd'), and, if you selected more than one, sorting them, separated by hyphen, in the order that you think best ranks them from most to least effective, within the context of the vignette provided."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A demanding client takes up a lot of Jill's time and then asks to speak to Jill's boss about her performance. Although Jill's boss assures her that her performance is fine, Jill feels upset. What action would be the most effective for Jill? (a) Talk to her friends or workmates about it; (b) Ignore the incident and move on to her next task; (c) Calm down by taking deep breaths or going for a short walk; (d) Think that she has been successful in the past and this client being difficult is not her fault."}], "sampled": ["The most effective course of action for Jill would be (c) Calm down by taking deep breaths or going for a short walk. This will help her to manage her emotions and reduce her stress levels. Additionally, it would be helpful for Jill to (d) Think that she has been successful in the past and this client being difficult is not her fault, as this will help her to maintain a positive self-image and not take the client's behavior personally."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:52.755527+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 75, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.32", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "d-c", "picked": null, "sampled": "The most effective course of action for Jill would be (c) Calm down by taking deep breaths or going for a short walk. This will help her to manage her emotions and reduce her stress levels. Additionally, it would be helpful for Jill to (d) Think that she has been successful in the past and this client being difficult is not her fault, as this will help her to maintain a positive self-image and not take the client's behavior personally.", "options": ["d-c"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:52.755597+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 76, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.80", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. The following questions each describe a situation, and ask you to choose which of five emotions is most likely to result from that situation. Here is an example: Clara receives a gift Clara is most likely to feel?  (a) happy (b) angry (c) frightened (d) bored (e) hungry. If you think Clara would feel happy, you would mark option A and then move to the next question. Select the most emotionally intelligent response by returning the one lowercase letter ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd') corresponding to that response."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Someone believes another person has deliberately caused something good to stop happening to them. However, they feel they can do something about it. They are most likely to feel? (a) Angry; (b) Contemptuous; (c) Distress; (d) Depressed; (e) Frustrated"}], "sampled": ["(a) Angry"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:52.767764+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 77, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.80", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "a", "picked": null, "sampled": "(a) Angry", "options": ["a"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:52.767807+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 78, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.58", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. The following questions each describe a situation, and ask you to choose which of five emotions is most likely to result from that situation. Here is an example: Clara receives a gift Clara is most likely to feel?  (a) happy (b) angry (c) frightened (d) bored (e) hungry. If you think Clara would feel happy, you would mark option A and then move to the next question. Select the most emotionally intelligent response by returning the one lowercase letter ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd') corresponding to that response."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Phil's workmate Bart asks Phil to lie for him about money Bart has been stealing from the company. Phil does not agree. Phil is most likely to feel? (a) Excitement; (b) Anger; (c) Horror; (d) Contempt; (e) Shame"}], "sampled": ["(b) Anger"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:53.443032+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 79, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.58", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "d", "picked": null, "sampled": "(b) Anger", "options": ["d"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:53.443081+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 80, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.62", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. The following questions each describe a situation, and ask you to choose which of five emotions is most likely to result from that situation. Here is an example: Clara receives a gift Clara is most likely to feel?  (a) happy (b) angry (c) frightened (d) bored (e) hungry. If you think Clara would feel happy, you would mark option A and then move to the next question. Select the most emotionally intelligent response by returning the one lowercase letter ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd') corresponding to that response."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Megan is looking to buy a house. Something happened and she felt regret. What is most likely to have happened? (a) She didn't make an offer on a house she wanted, and now she is trying to find out if it is too late; (b) She found a house she liked that she didn't think she would find; (c) She couldn't make an offer on a house she liked because the bank didn't get her the money in time; (d) She didn't make an offer on a house she liked and now someone else has bought it; (e) She made an offer on a house and is waiting to see if it is accepted."}], "sampled": ["(d) She didn't make an offer on a house she liked and now someone else has bought it."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:53.667924+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 81, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.62", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "d", "picked": null, "sampled": "(d) She didn't make an offer on a house she liked and now someone else has bought it.", "options": ["d"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:53.667959+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 82, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.70", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. The following questions each describe a situation, and ask you to choose which of five emotions is most likely to result from that situation. Here is an example: Clara receives a gift Clara is most likely to feel?  (a) happy (b) angry (c) frightened (d) bored (e) hungry. If you think Clara would feel happy, you would mark option A and then move to the next question. Select the most emotionally intelligent response by returning the one lowercase letter ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd') corresponding to that response."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Dorian's friend is ill and coughs all over him without bothering to turn away or cover his mouth. Dorian is most likely to feel? (a) Anxiety; (b) Dislike; (c) Surprise; (d) Jealousy; (e) Rage"}], "sampled": ["(b) Dislike."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:54.392590+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 83, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.70", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "b", "picked": null, "sampled": "(b) Dislike.", "options": ["b"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:54.392622+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 84, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.23", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from four responses the most effective course of action to manage both the emotions the person is feeling and the problems they face in that situation. Although more than one course of action might be acceptable, you are asked to choose what you think the most effective response for that person in that situation would be. Remember, you are not necessarily choosing what you would do, or the nicest thing to do, but choosing the most effective response for that situation. Select one or more response(s) by returning the one or more corresponding lowercase letter(s) ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd'), and, if you selected more than one, sorting them, separated by hyphen, in the order that you think best ranks them from most to least effective, within the context of the vignette provided."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Gloria's housemates never buy essential non-food items when they are running low, relying on Gloria to buy them, which she resents. They know each other reasonably well, but have not yet discussed financial issues. What action would be the most effective for Gloria? (a) Don't buy the items; (b) Introduce a new system for grocery shopping and sharing costs; (c) Tell her housemates she has a problem with this; (d) Hide her own personal store of items from the others."}], "sampled": ["(b) Introduce a new system for grocery shopping and sharing costs; (c) Tell her housemates she has a problem with this. \n\nExplanation: \nOption (a) of not buying the items may lead to resentment and tension among the housemates, and may not solve the underlying issue. Option (d) of hiding her own personal store of items is not a sustainable solution and may lead to further conflict. \n\nOption (b) of introducing a new system for grocery shopping and sharing costs can help establish clear expectations and responsibilities among the housemates, and may prevent future conflicts. Option (c) of telling her housemates she has a problem with this can help open up communication and allow for a discussion of the issue, leading to a potential resolution."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:54.408869+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 85, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.23", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "c-b", "picked": null, "sampled": "(b) Introduce a new system for grocery shopping and sharing costs; (c) Tell her housemates she has a problem with this. \n\nExplanation: \nOption (a) of not buying the items may lead to resentment and tension among the housemates, and may not solve the underlying issue. Option (d) of hiding her own personal store of items is not a sustainable solution and may lead to further conflict. \n\nOption (b) of introducing a new system for grocery shopping and sharing costs can help establish clear expectations and responsibilities among the housemates, and may prevent future conflicts. Option (c) of telling her housemates she has a problem with this can help open up communication and allow for a discussion of the issue, leading to a potential resolution.", "options": ["c-b"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:54.408903+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 86, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.72", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. The following questions each describe a situation, and ask you to choose which of five emotions is most likely to result from that situation. Here is an example: Clara receives a gift Clara is most likely to feel?  (a) happy (b) angry (c) frightened (d) bored (e) hungry. If you think Clara would feel happy, you would mark option A and then move to the next question. Select the most emotionally intelligent response by returning the one lowercase letter ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd') corresponding to that response."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Quan and his wife are talking about what happened to them that day. Something happened that caused Quan to feel surprised. What is most likely to have happened? (a) His wife talked a lot, which did not usually happen; (b) His wife talked about things that were different to what they usually discussed; (c) His wife told him that she might have some bad news; (d) His wife told Quan some news that was not what he thought it would be; (e) His wife told a funny story."}], "sampled": ["(d) His wife told Quan some news that was not what he thought it would be."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:54.468782+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 87, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.72", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "d", "picked": null, "sampled": "(d) His wife told Quan some news that was not what he thought it would be.", "options": ["d"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:54.468860+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 88, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.51", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. The following questions each describe a situation, and ask you to choose which of five emotions is most likely to result from that situation. Here is an example: Clara receives a gift Clara is most likely to feel?  (a) happy (b) angry (c) frightened (d) bored (e) hungry. If you think Clara would feel happy, you would mark option A and then move to the next question. Select the most emotionally intelligent response by returning the one lowercase letter ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd') corresponding to that response."}, {"role": "user", "content": "If the current situation continues, Denise's employer will probably be able to move her job to a location much closer to her home, which she really wants. Denise is most likely to feel? (a) Distress; (b) Joy; (c) Surprise; (d) Hope; (e) Fear"}], "sampled": ["(b) Joy"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:55.112893+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 89, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.51", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "d", "picked": null, "sampled": "(b) Joy", "options": ["d"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:55.112932+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 90, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.59", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. The following questions each describe a situation, and ask you to choose which of five emotions is most likely to result from that situation. Here is an example: Clara receives a gift Clara is most likely to feel?  (a) happy (b) angry (c) frightened (d) bored (e) hungry. If you think Clara would feel happy, you would mark option A and then move to the next question. Select the most emotionally intelligent response by returning the one lowercase letter ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd') corresponding to that response."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Jim enjoys spending Saturdays playing with his children in the park. This year they have sporting activities on Saturdays and cannot go to the park with him any more. Jim is most likely to feel? (a) Angry; (b) Sad; (c) Frustrated; (d) Distressed; (e) Ashamed"}], "sampled": ["(b) Sad"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:55.114551+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 91, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.59", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "b", "picked": null, "sampled": "(b) Sad", "options": ["b"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:55.114583+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 92, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.26", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from four responses the most effective course of action to manage both the emotions the person is feeling and the problems they face in that situation. Although more than one course of action might be acceptable, you are asked to choose what you think the most effective response for that person in that situation would be. Remember, you are not necessarily choosing what you would do, or the nicest thing to do, but choosing the most effective response for that situation. Select one or more response(s) by returning the one or more corresponding lowercase letter(s) ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd'), and, if you selected more than one, sorting them, separated by hyphen, in the order that you think best ranks them from most to least effective, within the context of the vignette provided."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Joel has always dealt with one particular client but on a very complex job his boss gives the task to a co-worker instead. Joel wonders whether his boss thinks he can't handle the important jobs. What action would be the most effective for Joel? (a) Believe he is performing well and will be given the next complex job; (b) Do good work so that he will be given the complex tasks in future; (c) Ask his boss why the co-worker was given the job; (d) Not worry about this unless it happens again."}], "sampled": ["Response: (b) Do good work so that he will be given the complex tasks in future.\n\nExplanation: Joel should focus on doing good work and proving his capability to his boss. This will increase his chances of being given complex tasks in the future. It is important for Joel to not let his emotions cloud his judgment and to continue to perform well. Option (a) is also a good response, but it is important for Joel to take action to prove his capability rather than just believing he is performing well. Option (c) may come across as confrontational and defensive, which could harm Joel's relationship with his boss. Option (d) is not an effective response as it does not address the issue at hand and may lead to Joel missing out on future opportunities."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:55.312037+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 93, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.26", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "c-b-d", "picked": null, "sampled": "Response: (b) Do good work so that he will be given the complex tasks in future.\n\nExplanation: Joel should focus on doing good work and proving his capability to his boss. This will increase his chances of being given complex tasks in the future. It is important for Joel to not let his emotions cloud his judgment and to continue to perform well. Option (a) is also a good response, but it is important for Joel to take action to prove his capability rather than just believing he is performing well. Option (c) may come across as confrontational and defensive, which could harm Joel's relationship with his boss. Option (d) is not an effective response as it does not address the issue at hand and may lead to Joel missing out on future opportunities.", "options": ["c-b-d"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:55.312086+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 94, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.33", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from four responses the most effective course of action to manage both the emotions the person is feeling and the problems they face in that situation. Although more than one course of action might be acceptable, you are asked to choose what you think the most effective response for that person in that situation would be. Remember, you are not necessarily choosing what you would do, or the nicest thing to do, but choosing the most effective response for that situation. Select one or more response(s) by returning the one or more corresponding lowercase letter(s) ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd'), and, if you selected more than one, sorting them, separated by hyphen, in the order that you think best ranks them from most to least effective, within the context of the vignette provided."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Blair and Flynn usually go to a cafe after the working week and chat about what's going on in the company. After Blair's job is moved to a different section in the company, he stops coming to the cafe. Flynn misses these Friday talks. What action would be the most effective for Flynn? (a) Go to the cafe or socialize with other workers; (b) Don't worry about it, ignore the changes and let Blair be; (c) Not talk to Blair again; (d) Invite Blair again, maybe rescheduling for another time."}], "sampled": ["(d) Invite Blair again, maybe rescheduling for another time."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:55.567273+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 95, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.33", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "d-a", "picked": null, "sampled": "(d) Invite Blair again, maybe rescheduling for another time.", "options": ["d-a"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:55.567332+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 96, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.27", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from four responses the most effective course of action to manage both the emotions the person is feeling and the problems they face in that situation. Although more than one course of action might be acceptable, you are asked to choose what you think the most effective response for that person in that situation would be. Remember, you are not necessarily choosing what you would do, or the nicest thing to do, but choosing the most effective response for that situation. Select one or more response(s) by returning the one or more corresponding lowercase letter(s) ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd'), and, if you selected more than one, sorting them, separated by hyphen, in the order that you think best ranks them from most to least effective, within the context of the vignette provided."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Hasina is overseas when she finds out that her father has passed away from an illness he has had for years. What action would be the most effective for Hasina? (a) Contact her close relatives for information and support; (b) Try not to think about it, going on with her daily life as best she can; (c) Feel terrible that she left the country at such a time; (d) Think deeply about the more profound meaning of this loss."}], "sampled": ["Response (a) would be the most effective course of action for Hasina. She is in a difficult emotional situation, and contacting close relatives for information and support can help her manage her emotions and begin to process her grief. Response (b) is not effective because it suggests avoiding the situation, which can lead to unresolved emotions and difficulties in the future. Response (c) is not effective because it focuses on self-blame and guilt, which can exacerbate negative emotions. Response (d) may be helpful in the long term, but it is not the most immediate or practical course of action for managing her emotions and the situation at hand. Therefore, the ranking would be (a) > (d) > (b) > (c)."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:55.575676+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 97, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.27", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "a", "picked": null, "sampled": "Response (a) would be the most effective course of action for Hasina. She is in a difficult emotional situation, and contacting close relatives for information and support can help her manage her emotions and begin to process her grief. Response (b) is not effective because it suggests avoiding the situation, which can lead to unresolved emotions and difficulties in the future. Response (c) is not effective because it focuses on self-blame and guilt, which can exacerbate negative emotions. Response (d) may be helpful in the long term, but it is not the most immediate or practical course of action for managing her emotions and the situation at hand. Therefore, the ranking would be (a) > (d) > (b) > (c).", "options": ["a"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:55.575716+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 98, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.39", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from four responses the most effective course of action to manage both the emotions the person is feeling and the problems they face in that situation. Although more than one course of action might be acceptable, you are asked to choose what you think the most effective response for that person in that situation would be. Remember, you are not necessarily choosing what you would do, or the nicest thing to do, but choosing the most effective response for that situation. Select one or more response(s) by returning the one or more corresponding lowercase letter(s) ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd'), and, if you selected more than one, sorting them, separated by hyphen, in the order that you think best ranks them from most to least effective, within the context of the vignette provided."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Alana has been acting in a high-ranking role for several months. A decision is made that only long-term employees can now act in these roles, and Alana has not been with the company long enough to do so. What action would be the most effective for Alana? (a) Quit that position; (b) Use that experience to get promoted when she is long term; (c) Accept this new rule, but feel hard-done-by; (d) Ask management if an exception can be made."}], "sampled": ["Option (b) would be the most effective course of action for Alana. She can use the experience she has gained in the high-ranking role to her advantage when she becomes eligible for the position. Option (d) could also be effective if Alana approaches management in a professional and respectful manner, explaining her situation and asking if an exception can be made. However, it is important to note that the decision ultimately lies with management and there is no guarantee that an exception will be made. Option (a) would not be effective as it would mean giving up the opportunity to gain valuable experience and skills. Option (c) would not be effective as it would lead to negative emotions and potentially harm Alana's work performance and relationships with colleagues. \n\nTherefore, the most effective responses are: (b) Use that experience to get promoted when she is long term; (d) Ask management if an exception can be made."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:55.676833+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 99, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.39", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "b-d-a", "picked": null, "sampled": "Option (b) would be the most effective course of action for Alana. She can use the experience she has gained in the high-ranking role to her advantage when she becomes eligible for the position. Option (d) could also be effective if Alana approaches management in a professional and respectful manner, explaining her situation and asking if an exception can be made. However, it is important to note that the decision ultimately lies with management and there is no guarantee that an exception will be made. Option (a) would not be effective as it would mean giving up the opportunity to gain valuable experience and skills. Option (c) would not be effective as it would lead to negative emotions and potentially harm Alana's work performance and relationships with colleagues. \n\nTherefore, the most effective responses are: (b) Use that experience to get promoted when she is long term; (d) Ask management if an exception can be made.", "options": ["b-d-a"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:55.676870+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 100, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.49", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. The following questions each describe a situation, and ask you to choose which of five emotions is most likely to result from that situation. Here is an example: Clara receives a gift Clara is most likely to feel?  (a) happy (b) angry (c) frightened (d) bored (e) hungry. If you think Clara would feel happy, you would mark option A and then move to the next question. Select the most emotionally intelligent response by returning the one lowercase letter ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd') corresponding to that response."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Edna's workmate organizes a goodbye party for Edna, who is going on holidays. Edna is most likely to feel? (a) Surprise; (b) Gratitude; (c) Pride; (d) Hope; (e) Relief"}], "sampled": ["(b) Gratitude."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:55.960095+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 101, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.49", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "b", "picked": null, "sampled": "(b) Gratitude.", "options": ["b"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:55.960152+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 102, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.19", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from four responses the most effective course of action to manage both the emotions the person is feeling and the problems they face in that situation. Although more than one course of action might be acceptable, you are asked to choose what you think the most effective response for that person in that situation would be. Remember, you are not necessarily choosing what you would do, or the nicest thing to do, but choosing the most effective response for that situation. Select one or more response(s) by returning the one or more corresponding lowercase letter(s) ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd'), and, if you selected more than one, sorting them, separated by hyphen, in the order that you think best ranks them from most to least effective, within the context of the vignette provided."}, {"role": "user", "content": "The woman who relieves Celia at the end of her shift is twenty minutes late without excuse or apology. What action would be the most effective for Celia? (a) Forget about it unless it happens again; (b) Tell the boss about it; (c) Ask for an explanation of her lateness; (d) Tell her that this is unacceptable."}], "sampled": ["(a) Forget about it unless it happens again."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:56.142603+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 103, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.19", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "c-a-d-b", "picked": null, "sampled": "(a) Forget about it unless it happens again.", "options": ["c-a-d-b"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:56.142637+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 104, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.53", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. The following questions each describe a situation, and ask you to choose which of five emotions is most likely to result from that situation. Here is an example: Clara receives a gift Clara is most likely to feel?  (a) happy (b) angry (c) frightened (d) bored (e) hungry. If you think Clara would feel happy, you would mark option A and then move to the next question. Select the most emotionally intelligent response by returning the one lowercase letter ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd') corresponding to that response."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Somebody is most likely to feel surprised after? (a) Something unexpected happens; (b) Something unfamiliar happens; (c) Something unusual happens; (d) Something scary happens; (e) Something silly happens."}], "sampled": ["(a) Something unexpected happens."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:56.217655+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 105, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.53", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "a", "picked": null, "sampled": "(a) Something unexpected happens.", "options": ["a"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:56.217749+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 106, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.65", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. The following questions each describe a situation, and ask you to choose which of five emotions is most likely to result from that situation. Here is an example: Clara receives a gift Clara is most likely to feel?  (a) happy (b) angry (c) frightened (d) bored (e) hungry. If you think Clara would feel happy, you would mark option A and then move to the next question. Select the most emotionally intelligent response by returning the one lowercase letter ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd') corresponding to that response."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Someone thinks that another person has deliberately caused something good to happen to them. They are most likely to feel? (a) Hope; (b) Pride; (c) Gratitude; (d) Surprise; (e) Relief"}], "sampled": ["(c) Gratitude"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:56.231424+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 107, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.65", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "c", "picked": null, "sampled": "(c) Gratitude", "options": ["c"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:56.231463+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 108, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.66", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. The following questions each describe a situation, and ask you to choose which of five emotions is most likely to result from that situation. Here is an example: Clara receives a gift Clara is most likely to feel?  (a) happy (b) angry (c) frightened (d) bored (e) hungry. If you think Clara would feel happy, you would mark option A and then move to the next question. Select the most emotionally intelligent response by returning the one lowercase letter ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd') corresponding to that response."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Kevin has been working at his current job for a few years. Out of the blue, he finds that he will receive a promotion. Kevin is most likely to feel? (a) Pride; (b) Relief; (c) Joy; (d) Hope; (e) Guilt"}], "sampled": ["(a) Pride."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:56.644545+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 109, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.66", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "e", "picked": null, "sampled": "(a) Pride.", "options": ["e"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:56.644585+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 110, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.21", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from four responses the most effective course of action to manage both the emotions the person is feeling and the problems they face in that situation. Although more than one course of action might be acceptable, you are asked to choose what you think the most effective response for that person in that situation would be. Remember, you are not necessarily choosing what you would do, or the nicest thing to do, but choosing the most effective response for that situation. Select one or more response(s) by returning the one or more corresponding lowercase letter(s) ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd'), and, if you selected more than one, sorting them, separated by hyphen, in the order that you think best ranks them from most to least effective, within the context of the vignette provided."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Evan's housemate cooked food late at night and left a huge mess in the kitchen that Evan discovered at breakfast. What action would be the most effective for Evan? (a) Tell his housemate to clean up the mess; (b) Ask his housemate that this not happen again; (c) Clean up the mess himself; (d) Assume that the housemate will clean it later."}], "sampled": ["(b) Ask his housemate that this not happen again; (c) Clean up the mess himself."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:56.645969+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 111, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.21", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "b-a-d", "picked": null, "sampled": "(b) Ask his housemate that this not happen again; (c) Clean up the mess himself.", "options": ["b-a-d"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:56.646003+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 112, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.61", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. The following questions each describe a situation, and ask you to choose which of five emotions is most likely to result from that situation. Here is an example: Clara receives a gift Clara is most likely to feel?  (a) happy (b) angry (c) frightened (d) bored (e) hungry. If you think Clara would feel happy, you would mark option A and then move to the next question. Select the most emotionally intelligent response by returning the one lowercase letter ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd') corresponding to that response."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Sheila's workmate intentionally does not give Sheila some important information about applying for a raise. Sheila is most likely to feel? (a) Depressed; (b) Contemptuous; (c) Frustrated; (d) Angry; (e) Distressed"}], "sampled": ["(d) Angry."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:56.669428+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 113, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.61", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "d", "picked": null, "sampled": "(d) Angry.", "options": ["d"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:56.669466+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 114, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.78", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. The following questions each describe a situation, and ask you to choose which of five emotions is most likely to result from that situation. Here is an example: Clara receives a gift Clara is most likely to feel?  (a) happy (b) angry (c) frightened (d) bored (e) hungry. If you think Clara would feel happy, you would mark option A and then move to the next question. Select the most emotionally intelligent response by returning the one lowercase letter ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd') corresponding to that response."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Leila has been unable to sleep well lately and there are no changes in her life that might indicate why. Leila is most likely to feel? (a) Angry; (b) Scared; (c) Sad; (d) Distressed; (e) Guilty"}], "sampled": ["(c) Sad"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:56.850235+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 115, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.78", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "d", "picked": null, "sampled": "(c) Sad", "options": ["d"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:56.850313+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 116, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.15", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from four responses the most effective course of action to manage both the emotions the person is feeling and the problems they face in that situation. Although more than one course of action might be acceptable, you are asked to choose what you think the most effective response for that person in that situation would be. Remember, you are not necessarily choosing what you would do, or the nicest thing to do, but choosing the most effective response for that situation. Select one or more response(s) by returning the one or more corresponding lowercase letter(s) ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd'), and, if you selected more than one, sorting them, separated by hyphen, in the order that you think best ranks them from most to least effective, within the context of the vignette provided."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Max prides himself on his work being of the highest quality. On a joint project, other people do a lousy job, assuming that Max will fix their mistakes. What action would be the most effective for Max? (a) Forget about it; (b) Confront the others, and tell them they must fix their mistakes; (c) Tell the project manager about the situation; (d) Fix the mistakes."}], "sampled": ["Ranking: b-c-d\n\nExplanation: \n\nThe most effective course of action for Max would be to confront the others and tell them they must fix their mistakes (b). By doing so, Max is setting clear expectations and boundaries, and holding others accountable for their work. This will not only ensure that the project is completed to a higher standard, but also prevent Max from being taken advantage of in future projects.\n\nIf the others do not respond positively to Max's confrontation, he should then tell the project manager about the situation (c). This will bring the issue to the attention of someone who has the authority to address it, and may result in consequences for those who are not meeting expectations.\n\nIf the project manager is unable or unwilling to address the situation, Max may need to fix the mistakes himself (d) in order to ensure that the project is completed to a satisfactory standard. However, this should be a last resort, as it reinforces the behavior of others relying on Max to fix their mistakes and may lead to burnout or resentment on Max's part.\n\nForgetting about it (a) is not an effective course of action, as it allows the behavior to continue and does not address the underlying issue."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:57.466711+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 117, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.15", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "b-c", "picked": null, "sampled": "Ranking: b-c-d\n\nExplanation: \n\nThe most effective course of action for Max would be to confront the others and tell them they must fix their mistakes (b). By doing so, Max is setting clear expectations and boundaries, and holding others accountable for their work. This will not only ensure that the project is completed to a higher standard, but also prevent Max from being taken advantage of in future projects.\n\nIf the others do not respond positively to Max's confrontation, he should then tell the project manager about the situation (c). This will bring the issue to the attention of someone who has the authority to address it, and may result in consequences for those who are not meeting expectations.\n\nIf the project manager is unable or unwilling to address the situation, Max may need to fix the mistakes himself (d) in order to ensure that the project is completed to a satisfactory standard. However, this should be a last resort, as it reinforces the behavior of others relying on Max to fix their mistakes and may lead to burnout or resentment on Max's part.\n\nForgetting about it (a) is not an effective course of action, as it allows the behavior to continue and does not address the underlying issue.", "options": ["b-c"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:57.466767+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 118, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.77", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. The following questions each describe a situation, and ask you to choose which of five emotions is most likely to result from that situation. Here is an example: Clara receives a gift Clara is most likely to feel?  (a) happy (b) angry (c) frightened (d) bored (e) hungry. If you think Clara would feel happy, you would mark option A and then move to the next question. Select the most emotionally intelligent response by returning the one lowercase letter ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd') corresponding to that response."}, {"role": "user", "content": "The nature of Sara's job changes due to unpredictable factors and she no longer gets to do the portions of her work that she most enjoyed. Sara is most likely to feel? (a) Ashamed; (b) Sad; (c) Angry; (d) Distressed; (e) Frustrated"}], "sampled": ["(b) Sad"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:58.102733+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 119, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.77", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "b", "picked": null, "sampled": "(b) Sad", "options": ["b"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:58.102772+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 120, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.25", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from four responses the most effective course of action to manage both the emotions the person is feeling and the problems they face in that situation. Although more than one course of action might be acceptable, you are asked to choose what you think the most effective response for that person in that situation would be. Remember, you are not necessarily choosing what you would do, or the nicest thing to do, but choosing the most effective response for that situation. Select one or more response(s) by returning the one or more corresponding lowercase letter(s) ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd'), and, if you selected more than one, sorting them, separated by hyphen, in the order that you think best ranks them from most to least effective, within the context of the vignette provided."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Moshe finds out that some members of his social sports team have been saying that he is not a very good player. What action would be the most effective for Moshe? (a) Although he may be bad at sport remember he is good at other things; (b) Forget about it; (c) Do some extra training to try and improve; (d) Leave that sports team."}], "sampled": ["c-d. The most effective course of action for Moshe would be to do some extra training to try and improve (c) and, if the situation does not improve, to leave that sports team (d). By doing extra training, Moshe can improve his skills and prove his teammates wrong. However, if the situation does not improve and he continues to feel uncomfortable or unwelcome on the team, leaving may be the best option for his emotional well-being. Telling Moshe to forget about it (b) may not be helpful as it may cause him to suppress his emotions and not address the issue. Telling Moshe to focus on his other strengths (a) may be helpful in boosting his self-esteem, but it does not address the issue at hand."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:58.426218+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 121, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.25", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "c-a", "picked": null, "sampled": "c-d. The most effective course of action for Moshe would be to do some extra training to try and improve (c) and, if the situation does not improve, to leave that sports team (d). By doing extra training, Moshe can improve his skills and prove his teammates wrong. However, if the situation does not improve and he continues to feel uncomfortable or unwelcome on the team, leaving may be the best option for his emotional well-being. Telling Moshe to forget about it (b) may not be helpful as it may cause him to suppress his emotions and not address the issue. Telling Moshe to focus on his other strengths (a) may be helpful in boosting his self-esteem, but it does not address the issue at hand.", "options": ["c-a"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:58.426274+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 122, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.41", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from four responses the most effective course of action to manage both the emotions the person is feeling and the problems they face in that situation. Although more than one course of action might be acceptable, you are asked to choose what you think the most effective response for that person in that situation would be. Remember, you are not necessarily choosing what you would do, or the nicest thing to do, but choosing the most effective response for that situation. Select one or more response(s) by returning the one or more corresponding lowercase letter(s) ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd'), and, if you selected more than one, sorting them, separated by hyphen, in the order that you think best ranks them from most to least effective, within the context of the vignette provided."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Jumah has been working at a new job part-time while he studies. His shift times for the week are changed at the last minute, without consulting him. What action would be the most effective for Jumah? (a) Refuse to work the new shifts; (b) Find out if there is some reasonable explanation for the shift changes; (c) Tell the manager in charge of shifts that he is not happy about it; (d) Grumpily accept the changes and do the shifts."}], "sampled": ["The most effective course of action for Jumah would be to select response (b) Find out if there is some reasonable explanation for the shift changes. This will help Jumah to understand why the shift times were changed and whether there is a valid reason for it. Depending on the explanation, Jumah can then decide whether to accept the new shifts or negotiate for a better arrangement. Response (c) Tell the manager in charge of shifts that he is not happy about it could also be effective if Jumah approaches the manager in a calm and professional manner, and explains his concerns. However, response (a) Refuse to work the new shifts and response (d) Grumpily accept the changes and do the shifts are not effective because they do not address the problem or help Jumah to find a solution."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:59.037808+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 123, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.41", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "b-c", "picked": null, "sampled": "The most effective course of action for Jumah would be to select response (b) Find out if there is some reasonable explanation for the shift changes. This will help Jumah to understand why the shift times were changed and whether there is a valid reason for it. Depending on the explanation, Jumah can then decide whether to accept the new shifts or negotiate for a better arrangement. Response (c) Tell the manager in charge of shifts that he is not happy about it could also be effective if Jumah approaches the manager in a calm and professional manner, and explains his concerns. However, response (a) Refuse to work the new shifts and response (d) Grumpily accept the changes and do the shifts are not effective because they do not address the problem or help Jumah to find a solution.", "options": ["b-c"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:59.037881+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 124, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.94", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from among four responses what you would be most likely to do in the situation. Please note, there are no right or wrong answers. We all deal with situations in different ways. All that you need to do is answer each question honestly. Select one or more response(s) by returning the one or more corresponding lowercase letter(s) ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd'), and, if you selected more than one, sorting them, separated by hyphen, in the order that you think best ranks them from most to least effective, within the context of the vignette provided."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are the secretary for your school chess club. You just found out that some of the club members have been complaining because you lose things and don't show up on time. What would you do in this situation? (a) Point out that you are not the only one who is late; (b) Make a list of your strengths and find a role in the club that would better suit you; (c) Quit the club and look for another one that will appreciate you; (d) Make an effort to be on time and keep track of things"}], "sampled": ["d"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:59.104175+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 125, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.94", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "a-b-c-d", "picked": null, "sampled": "d", "options": ["a-b-c-d"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:59.104232+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 126, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.57", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. The following questions each describe a situation, and ask you to choose which of five emotions is most likely to result from that situation. Here is an example: Clara receives a gift Clara is most likely to feel?  (a) happy (b) angry (c) frightened (d) bored (e) hungry. If you think Clara would feel happy, you would mark option A and then move to the next question. Select the most emotionally intelligent response by returning the one lowercase letter ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd') corresponding to that response."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Someone believes that another person harmed them on purpose. There is not a lot that can be done to make things better. The person involved is most likely to feel? (a) Dislike; (b) Rage; (c) Jealousy; (d) Surprise; (e) Anxiety"}], "sampled": ["(b) Rage."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:59.750522+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 127, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.57", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "a", "picked": null, "sampled": "(b) Rage.", "options": ["a"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 17:59:59.750569+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 128, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.79", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. The following questions each describe a situation, and ask you to choose which of five emotions is most likely to result from that situation. Here is an example: Clara receives a gift Clara is most likely to feel?  (a) happy (b) angry (c) frightened (d) bored (e) hungry. If you think Clara would feel happy, you would mark option A and then move to the next question. Select the most emotionally intelligent response by returning the one lowercase letter ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd') corresponding to that response."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A person feels they have control over a situation. The situation turns out badly for no particular reason. The person involved is most likely to feel? (a) Confused; (b) Relieved; (c) Surprised; (d) Frustrated; (e) Distressed"}], "sampled": ["(d) Frustrated."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:00:00.538825+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 129, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.79", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "d", "picked": null, "sampled": "(d) Frustrated.", "options": ["d"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:00:00.538885+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 130, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.40", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from four responses the most effective course of action to manage both the emotions the person is feeling and the problems they face in that situation. Although more than one course of action might be acceptable, you are asked to choose what you think the most effective response for that person in that situation would be. Remember, you are not necessarily choosing what you would do, or the nicest thing to do, but choosing the most effective response for that situation. Select one or more response(s) by returning the one or more corresponding lowercase letter(s) ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd'), and, if you selected more than one, sorting them, separated by hyphen, in the order that you think best ranks them from most to least effective, within the context of the vignette provided."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Reece's friend points out that her young children seem to be developing more quickly than Reece's. Reece sees that this is true. What action would be the most effective for Reece? (a) Talk the issue over with another friend; (b) Angrily confront her friend about making such statements; (c) Realize that children develop at different rates; (d) Talk to a doctor about what the normal rates of development are."}], "sampled": ["(c) Realize that children develop at different rates. (d) Talk to a doctor about what the normal rates of development are."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:00:01.037920+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 131, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.40", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "d-c", "picked": null, "sampled": "(c) Realize that children develop at different rates. (d) Talk to a doctor about what the normal rates of development are.", "options": ["d-c"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:00:01.037993+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 132, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.5", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from four responses the most effective course of action to manage both the emotions the person is feeling and the problems they face in that situation. Although more than one course of action might be acceptable, you are asked to choose what you think the most effective response for that person in that situation would be. Remember, you are not necessarily choosing what you would do, or the nicest thing to do, but choosing the most effective response for that situation. Select one or more response(s) by returning the one or more corresponding lowercase letter(s) ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd'), and, if you selected more than one, sorting them, separated by hyphen, in the order that you think best ranks them from most to least effective, within the context of the vignette provided."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Martina is accepted for a highly sought after contract, but has to fly to the location. Martina has a phobia of flying. What action would be the most effective for Martina? (a) See a doctor about this; (b) Don't go to the location; (c) Just get through it; (d) Find alternative travel arrangements."}], "sampled": ["a-d. The most effective course of action for Martina would be to see a doctor about her phobia of flying and find alternative travel arrangements. Seeing a doctor can help Martina manage her anxiety and fear of flying, and finding alternative travel arrangements can help her avoid the trigger of her phobia altogether."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:00:01.410197+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 133, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.5", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a-d", "picked": "a-d", "sampled": "a-d. The most effective course of action for Martina would be to see a doctor about her phobia of flying and find alternative travel arrangements. Seeing a doctor can help Martina manage her anxiety and fear of flying, and finding alternative travel arrangements can help her avoid the trigger of her phobia altogether.", "options": ["a-d"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:00:01.410252+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 134, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.92", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from among four responses what you would be most likely to do in the situation. Please note, there are no right or wrong answers. We all deal with situations in different ways. All that you need to do is answer each question honestly. Select one or more response(s) by returning the one or more corresponding lowercase letter(s) ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd'), and, if you selected more than one, sorting them, separated by hyphen, in the order that you think best ranks them from most to least effective, within the context of the vignette provided."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You have been working very hard with other students on a group project. A member of your team gives you some badly written work to include in the project. There is very little time before the project is due. What would you do in this situation? (a) Suggest ways that the student can improve the work; (b) Don't worry about it, just put the bad work in; (c) Tell the teacher about the situation; (d) Rewrite the work yourself"}], "sampled": ["a-d"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:00:01.739173+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 135, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.92", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "a-c-d-b", "picked": null, "sampled": "a-d", "options": ["a-c-d-b"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:00:01.739217+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 136, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.2", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from four responses the most effective course of action to manage both the emotions the person is feeling and the problems they face in that situation. Although more than one course of action might be acceptable, you are asked to choose what you think the most effective response for that person in that situation would be. Remember, you are not necessarily choosing what you would do, or the nicest thing to do, but choosing the most effective response for that situation. Select one or more response(s) by returning the one or more corresponding lowercase letter(s) ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd'), and, if you selected more than one, sorting them, separated by hyphen, in the order that you think best ranks them from most to least effective, within the context of the vignette provided."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Pete has specific skills that his workmates do not and he feels that his workload is higher because of it. What action would be the most effective for Pete? (a) Speak to his boss about this; (b) Start looking for a new job; (c) Be very proud of his unique skills; (d) Speak to his workmates about this."}], "sampled": ["a-d. The most effective course of action for Pete would be to speak to his boss about his workload. He can explain how his unique skills are contributing to his higher workload and ask for a solution that would balance the workload among his colleagues. It is also important for him to speak to his workmates about this, as they may not be aware of the situation and may be willing to help. Starting to look for a new job or being proud of his unique skills may not address the problem at hand."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:00:02.108375+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 137, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.2", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "a-c-d", "picked": null, "sampled": "a-d. The most effective course of action for Pete would be to speak to his boss about his workload. He can explain how his unique skills are contributing to his higher workload and ask for a solution that would balance the workload among his colleagues. It is also important for him to speak to his workmates about this, as they may not be aware of the situation and may be willing to help. Starting to look for a new job or being proud of his unique skills may not address the problem at hand.", "options": ["a-c-d"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:00:02.108432+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 138, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.76", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. The following questions each describe a situation, and ask you to choose which of five emotions is most likely to result from that situation. Here is an example: Clara receives a gift Clara is most likely to feel?  (a) happy (b) angry (c) frightened (d) bored (e) hungry. If you think Clara would feel happy, you would mark option A and then move to the next question. Select the most emotionally intelligent response by returning the one lowercase letter ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd') corresponding to that response."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A supervisor who is unpleasant to work for leaves Alfonso's work. Alfonso is most likely to feel? (a) Joy; (b) Hope; (c) Regret; (d) Relief; (e) Sadness"}], "sampled": ["(d) Relief"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:00:02.208456+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 139, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.76", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "d", "picked": null, "sampled": "(d) Relief", "options": ["d"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:00:02.208533+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 140, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.36", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from four responses the most effective course of action to manage both the emotions the person is feeling and the problems they face in that situation. Although more than one course of action might be acceptable, you are asked to choose what you think the most effective response for that person in that situation would be. Remember, you are not necessarily choosing what you would do, or the nicest thing to do, but choosing the most effective response for that situation. Select one or more response(s) by returning the one or more corresponding lowercase letter(s) ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd'), and, if you selected more than one, sorting them, separated by hyphen, in the order that you think best ranks them from most to least effective, within the context of the vignette provided."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Dorian needs to have some prostate surgery and is quite scared about the process. He has heard that it is quite painful. What action would be the most effective for Dorian? (a) Find out as much as he can about the procedure and focus on calming down; (b) Keep busy in the meantime so he doesn't think about the impending surgery; (c) Talk to his family about his concerns; (d) Talk to his doctor about what will happen."}], "sampled": ["The most effective course of action for Dorian would be (a) Find out as much as he can about the procedure and focus on calming down; (d) Talk to his doctor about what will happen. By finding out as much as he can about the procedure, Dorian can gain a better understanding of what to expect and alleviate some of his fears. Talking to his doctor can also provide reassurance and help him understand the process better. Keeping busy or talking to family may not address his concerns directly and may not be as effective in managing his anxiety."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:00:02.680414+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 141, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.36", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "d-a", "picked": null, "sampled": "The most effective course of action for Dorian would be (a) Find out as much as he can about the procedure and focus on calming down; (d) Talk to his doctor about what will happen. By finding out as much as he can about the procedure, Dorian can gain a better understanding of what to expect and alleviate some of his fears. Talking to his doctor can also provide reassurance and help him understand the process better. Keeping busy or talking to family may not address his concerns directly and may not be as effective in managing his anxiety.", "options": ["d-a"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:00:02.680493+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 142, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.55", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. The following questions each describe a situation, and ask you to choose which of five emotions is most likely to result from that situation. Here is an example: Clara receives a gift Clara is most likely to feel?  (a) happy (b) angry (c) frightened (d) bored (e) hungry. If you think Clara would feel happy, you would mark option A and then move to the next question. Select the most emotionally intelligent response by returning the one lowercase letter ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd') corresponding to that response."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Charles is meeting a friend to see a movie. The friend is very late and they are not in time to make it to the movie. Charles is most likely to feel? (a) Depressed; (b) Frustrated; (c) Angry; (d) Contemptuous; (e) Distressed"}], "sampled": ["(b) Frustrated."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:00:02.795107+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 143, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.55", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "c", "picked": null, "sampled": "(b) Frustrated.", "options": ["c"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:00:02.795159+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 144, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.97", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from among four responses what you would be most likely to do in the situation. Please note, there are no right or wrong answers. We all deal with situations in different ways. All that you need to do is answer each question honestly. Select one or more response(s) by returning the one or more corresponding lowercase letter(s) ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd'), and, if you selected more than one, sorting them, separated by hyphen, in the order that you think best ranks them from most to least effective, within the context of the vignette provided."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Your best friend is moving to another state and is unlikely to come back. You have been good friends for many years. What would you do in this situation? (a) Make sure you both keep in contact through email, phone, or letter writing; (b) Spend time with other friends, and keep busy; (c) Hope that your best friend will return soon; (d) Forget about your best friend"}], "sampled": ["a) Make sure you both keep in contact through email, phone, or letter writing."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:00:03.196178+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 145, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.97", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "b-c-a-d", "picked": null, "sampled": "a) Make sure you both keep in contact through email, phone, or letter writing.", "options": ["b-c-a-d"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:00:03.196223+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 146, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.86", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from among four responses what you would be most likely to do in the situation. Please note, there are no right or wrong answers. We all deal with situations in different ways. All that you need to do is answer each question honestly. Select the most emotionally intelligent response by returning the one lowercase letter ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd') corresponding to that response."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Amy is usually happy at work and things also go well for her at home. She thought that she and her coworkers were generally well-treated, including well-paid. Today, everyone in her unit received a modest pay increase as part of a corporate wide promotion. How did Amy feel? (a) Surprised and shocked; (b) Peaceful and quiet; (c) Humbled and guilty; (d) Proud and dominant"}], "sampled": ["(b) Peaceful and quiet."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:00:03.325102+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 147, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.86", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "b", "picked": null, "sampled": "(b) Peaceful and quiet.", "options": ["b"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:00:03.325160+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 148, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.16", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from four responses the most effective course of action to manage both the emotions the person is feeling and the problems they face in that situation. Although more than one course of action might be acceptable, you are asked to choose what you think the most effective response for that person in that situation would be. Remember, you are not necessarily choosing what you would do, or the nicest thing to do, but choosing the most effective response for that situation. Select one or more response(s) by returning the one or more corresponding lowercase letter(s) ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd'), and, if you selected more than one, sorting them, separated by hyphen, in the order that you think best ranks them from most to least effective, within the context of the vignette provided."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Daniel has been accepted for a prestigious position in a different country from his family, who he is close to. He and his wife decide it is worth relocating. What action would be the most effective for Daniel? (a) Realize he shouldn't have applied for the job if he didn't want to leave; (b) Set up a system for staying in touch, like weekly phone calls or emails; (c) Think about the great opportunities this change offers; (d) Don't take the position."}], "sampled": ["Response (b) would be the most effective for Daniel. Moving to a different country can be a difficult and emotional experience, especially when leaving loved ones behind. Setting up a system for staying in touch can help Daniel and his family feel connected despite the distance. Response (c) could also be effective in helping Daniel focus on the positive aspects of the move, but it may not address the emotional challenges of being away from family. Responses (a) and (d) are not effective because they do not address the situation at hand and do not offer any solutions for managing the emotions and challenges that come with relocating."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:00:03.333070+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 149, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.16", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "b-c", "picked": null, "sampled": "Response (b) would be the most effective for Daniel. Moving to a different country can be a difficult and emotional experience, especially when leaving loved ones behind. Setting up a system for staying in touch can help Daniel and his family feel connected despite the distance. Response (c) could also be effective in helping Daniel focus on the positive aspects of the move, but it may not address the emotional challenges of being away from family. Responses (a) and (d) are not effective because they do not address the situation at hand and do not offer any solutions for managing the emotions and challenges that come with relocating.", "options": ["b-c"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:00:03.333112+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 150, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.18", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from four responses the most effective course of action to manage both the emotions the person is feeling and the problems they face in that situation. Although more than one course of action might be acceptable, you are asked to choose what you think the most effective response for that person in that situation would be. Remember, you are not necessarily choosing what you would do, or the nicest thing to do, but choosing the most effective response for that situation. Select one or more response(s) by returning the one or more corresponding lowercase letter(s) ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd'), and, if you selected more than one, sorting them, separated by hyphen, in the order that you think best ranks them from most to least effective, within the context of the vignette provided."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Mei Ling answers the phone and hears that close relatives are in hospital critically ill. What action would be the most effective for Mei Ling? (a) Let herself cry and express emotion for as long as she feels like; (b) Speak to other family to calm herself and find out what is happening, then visit the hospital; (c) There is nothing she can do; (d) Visit the hospital and ask staff about their condition."}], "sampled": ["b-d. \n\nExplanation: In this situation, it is important for Mei Ling to take action to manage her emotions and also address the problem at hand. Option (a) may be a natural response, but it does not address the problem and may prolong her distress. Option (c) is not helpful and may make Mei Ling feel helpless. Option (b) is a good first step as it allows her to gather information and seek support from other family members. Option (d) is also important as it allows her to directly address the problem and get updates on the condition of her relatives."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:00:03.503129+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 151, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.18", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "b-a", "picked": null, "sampled": "b-d. \n\nExplanation: In this situation, it is important for Mei Ling to take action to manage her emotions and also address the problem at hand. Option (a) may be a natural response, but it does not address the problem and may prolong her distress. Option (c) is not helpful and may make Mei Ling feel helpless. Option (b) is a good first step as it allows her to gather information and seek support from other family members. Option (d) is also important as it allows her to directly address the problem and get updates on the condition of her relatives.", "options": ["b-a"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:00:03.503186+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 152, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.31", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from four responses the most effective course of action to manage both the emotions the person is feeling and the problems they face in that situation. Although more than one course of action might be acceptable, you are asked to choose what you think the most effective response for that person in that situation would be. Remember, you are not necessarily choosing what you would do, or the nicest thing to do, but choosing the most effective response for that situation. Select one or more response(s) by returning the one or more corresponding lowercase letter(s) ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd'), and, if you selected more than one, sorting them, separated by hyphen, in the order that you think best ranks them from most to least effective, within the context of the vignette provided."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Mallory moves from a small company to a very large one, where there is little personal contact, which she misses. What action would be the most effective for Mallory? (a) Talk to her workmates, try to create social contacts and make friends; (b) Start looking for a new job so she can leave that environment; (c) Just give it time, and things will be okay; (d) Concentrate on her outside-work friends and colleagues from previous jobs."}], "sampled": ["a) Talk to her workmates, try to create social contacts and make friends."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:00:04.430033+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 153, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.31", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "a-d", "picked": null, "sampled": "a) Talk to her workmates, try to create social contacts and make friends.", "options": ["a-d"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:00:04.430090+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 154, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.89", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from among four responses what you would be most likely to do in the situation. Please note, there are no right or wrong answers. We all deal with situations in different ways. All that you need to do is answer each question honestly. Select one or more response(s) by returning the one or more corresponding lowercase letter(s) ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd'), and, if you selected more than one, sorting them, separated by hyphen, in the order that you think best ranks them from most to least effective, within the context of the vignette provided."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You and James sometimes help each other with homework. After you help James on a difficult project, the teacher is very critical of this work. James blames you for his bad grade. You respond that James should be grateful, because you were doing him a favor. What would you do in this situation? (a) Tell him from now on he has to do his own homework; (b) Apologize to him; (c) Tell him I am happy to help, but you are responsible for what you turn ind; (d) Don't talk to him"}], "sampled": ["(c) Tell him I am happy to help, but you are responsible for what you turn in."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:00:04.580049+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 155, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.89", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "c-a-b-d", "picked": null, "sampled": "(c) Tell him I am happy to help, but you are responsible for what you turn in.", "options": ["c-a-b-d"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:00:04.580104+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 156, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.88", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from among four responses what you would be most likely to do in the situation. Please note, there are no right or wrong answers. We all deal with situations in different ways. All that you need to do is answer each question honestly. Select the most emotionally intelligent response by returning the one lowercase letter ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd') corresponding to that response."}, {"role": "user", "content": "An executive in a corporation felt displeased and then resentful. What happened in between? (a) A subordinate failed to achieve his sales goals for the period; (b) Another officer in the company, who he believed to be incompetent, won a pay increase much larger than his own; (c) He read a news item about people in another part of the world living in poverty and how a major charity was facing obstacles in their relief efforts; (d) His wife was helping his children with their homework; (e) No one seemed to like him"}], "sampled": ["(b) Another officer in the company, who he believed to be incompetent, won a pay increase much larger than his own."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:00:05.351807+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 157, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.88", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "b", "picked": null, "sampled": "(b) Another officer in the company, who he believed to be incompetent, won a pay increase much larger than his own.", "options": ["b"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:00:05.351841+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 158, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.37", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from four responses the most effective course of action to manage both the emotions the person is feeling and the problems they face in that situation. Although more than one course of action might be acceptable, you are asked to choose what you think the most effective response for that person in that situation would be. Remember, you are not necessarily choosing what you would do, or the nicest thing to do, but choosing the most effective response for that situation. Select one or more response(s) by returning the one or more corresponding lowercase letter(s) ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd'), and, if you selected more than one, sorting them, separated by hyphen, in the order that you think best ranks them from most to least effective, within the context of the vignette provided."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Hannah's access to essential resources has been delayed and her work is way behind schedule. Her progress report makes no mention of the lack of resources. What action would be the most effective for Hannah? (a) Explain the lack of resources to her boss or to management; (b) Learn that she should plan ahead for next time; (c) Document the lack of resources in her progress report; (d) Don't worry about it."}], "sampled": ["The most effective course of action for Hannah would be to (c) document the lack of resources in her progress report. This will help her boss or management to understand the situation and take necessary actions to provide her with the resources she needs. However, it would also be important for her to (a) explain the lack of resources to her boss or management, as this will help to ensure that the issue is addressed and resolved. Planning ahead for next time (b) may also be helpful, but it is not the most effective response in this situation. (d) Ignoring the issue is not a good option as it will only lead to further delays and problems. Therefore, the most effective responses in order of priority would be (c) followed by (a)."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:00:05.352083+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 159, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.37", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "c-a", "picked": null, "sampled": "The most effective course of action for Hannah would be to (c) document the lack of resources in her progress report. This will help her boss or management to understand the situation and take necessary actions to provide her with the resources she needs. However, it would also be important for her to (a) explain the lack of resources to her boss or management, as this will help to ensure that the issue is addressed and resolved. Planning ahead for next time (b) may also be helpful, but it is not the most effective response in this situation. (d) Ignoring the issue is not a good option as it will only lead to further delays and problems. Therefore, the most effective responses in order of priority would be (c) followed by (a).", "options": ["c-a"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:00:05.352104+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 160, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.90", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from among four responses what you would be most likely to do in the situation. Please note, there are no right or wrong answers. We all deal with situations in different ways. All that you need to do is answer each question honestly. Select one or more response(s) by returning the one or more corresponding lowercase letter(s) ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd'), and, if you selected more than one, sorting them, separated by hyphen, in the order that you think best ranks them from most to least effective, within the context of the vignette provided."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are nervous about a speech that you need to give to the whole school about a project you've been working on. You are worried that some of the students will not understanding your speech, as it deals with some very difficult topics. What would you do in this situation? (a) Work on your speech to make it easier to understand and ask for questions afterwards; (b) Practice your speech in front of your family or close friends; (c) Just give the speech; (d) Be positive and confident, knowing it will go well"}], "sampled": ["a) Work on your speech to make it easier to understand and ask for questions afterwards; b) Practice your speech in front of your family or close friends."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:00:05.861491+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 161, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.90", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "a-b-d-c", "picked": null, "sampled": "a) Work on your speech to make it easier to understand and ask for questions afterwards; b) Practice your speech in front of your family or close friends.", "options": ["a-b-d-c"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:00:05.861520+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 162, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.30", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from four responses the most effective course of action to manage both the emotions the person is feeling and the problems they face in that situation. Although more than one course of action might be acceptable, you are asked to choose what you think the most effective response for that person in that situation would be. Remember, you are not necessarily choosing what you would do, or the nicest thing to do, but choosing the most effective response for that situation. Select one or more response(s) by returning the one or more corresponding lowercase letter(s) ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd'), and, if you selected more than one, sorting them, separated by hyphen, in the order that you think best ranks them from most to least effective, within the context of the vignette provided."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Juno is fairly sure his company is going down and his job is under threat. It is a large company and nothing official has been said. What action would be the most effective for Juno? (a) Find out what is happening and discuss his concerns with his family; (b) Try to keep the company afloat by working harder; (c) Start applying for other jobs; (d) Think of these events as an opportunity for a new start."}], "sampled": ["Response: (c) Start applying for other jobs.\n\nExplanation: Juno's job is under threat, and he is fairly sure that his company is going down. In this situation, it is important for Juno to start looking for other job opportunities. This will not only help him secure a job in case he loses his current one, but it will also give him a sense of control over the situation. Option (a) may not be effective as Juno may not have access to official information, and discussing his concerns with family may not provide a solution. Option (b) may not be effective as it is not solely Juno's responsibility to keep the company afloat, and working harder may not necessarily save the company. Option (d) may not be effective as it may not be easy for Juno to see these events as an opportunity for a new start, especially if he is worried about losing his job."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:00:06.336355+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 163, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.30", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "a-c", "picked": null, "sampled": "Response: (c) Start applying for other jobs.\n\nExplanation: Juno's job is under threat, and he is fairly sure that his company is going down. In this situation, it is important for Juno to start looking for other job opportunities. This will not only help him secure a job in case he loses his current one, but it will also give him a sense of control over the situation. Option (a) may not be effective as Juno may not have access to official information, and discussing his concerns with family may not provide a solution. Option (b) may not be effective as it is not solely Juno's responsibility to keep the company afloat, and working harder may not necessarily save the company. Option (d) may not be effective as it may not be easy for Juno to see these events as an opportunity for a new start, especially if he is worried about losing his job.", "options": ["a-c"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:00:06.336417+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 164, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.20", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from four responses the most effective course of action to manage both the emotions the person is feeling and the problems they face in that situation. Although more than one course of action might be acceptable, you are asked to choose what you think the most effective response for that person in that situation would be. Remember, you are not necessarily choosing what you would do, or the nicest thing to do, but choosing the most effective response for that situation. Select one or more response(s) by returning the one or more corresponding lowercase letter(s) ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd'), and, if you selected more than one, sorting them, separated by hyphen, in the order that you think best ranks them from most to least effective, within the context of the vignette provided."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Upon entering full-time study, Vincent cannot afford the time or money he used to spend on water-polo training, which he was quite good at. Although he enjoys full-time study, he misses training. What action would be the most effective for Vincent? (a) Concentrate on studying hard, to pass his course; (b) See if there is a local league or a less expensive and less time-consuming sport; (c) Think deeply about whether sport or study is more important to him; (d) Find out about sporting scholarships or bursaries."}], "sampled": ["b-See if there is a local league or a less expensive and less time-consuming sport; d-Find out about sporting scholarships or bursaries."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:00:06.369485+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 165, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.20", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "b-d-c", "picked": null, "sampled": "b-See if there is a local league or a less expensive and less time-consuming sport; d-Find out about sporting scholarships or bursaries.", "options": ["b-d-c"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:00:06.369513+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 166, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.71", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. The following questions each describe a situation, and ask you to choose which of five emotions is most likely to result from that situation. Here is an example: Clara receives a gift Clara is most likely to feel?  (a) happy (b) angry (c) frightened (d) bored (e) hungry. If you think Clara would feel happy, you would mark option A and then move to the next question. Select the most emotionally intelligent response by returning the one lowercase letter ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd') corresponding to that response."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Although she has been careful to avoid all risk factors, Tina has contracted cancer. There is only a small chance that the cancer will be benign and nothing Tina does now can make a difference. Tina is most likely to feel? (a) Scared; (b) Distressed; (c) Irritated; (d) Sad; (e) Hopeful"}], "sampled": ["(d) Sad"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:00:06.621065+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 167, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.71", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "a", "picked": null, "sampled": "(d) Sad", "options": ["a"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:00:06.621120+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 168, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.8", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from four responses the most effective course of action to manage both the emotions the person is feeling and the problems they face in that situation. Although more than one course of action might be acceptable, you are asked to choose what you think the most effective response for that person in that situation would be. Remember, you are not necessarily choosing what you would do, or the nicest thing to do, but choosing the most effective response for that situation. Select one or more response(s) by returning the one or more corresponding lowercase letter(s) ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd'), and, if you selected more than one, sorting them, separated by hyphen, in the order that you think best ranks them from most to least effective, within the context of the vignette provided."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Surbhi starts a new job where he doesn't know anyone and finds that no one is particularly friendly. What action would be the most effective for Surbhi? (a) Have fun with his friends outside of work hours; (b) Concentrate on doing his work well at the new job; (c) Make an effort to talk to people and be friendly himself; (d) Leave the job and find one with a better environment."}], "sampled": ["Response: (c) Make an effort to talk to people and be friendly himself. \n\nExplanation: While having fun with friends outside of work hours and concentrating on doing work well are both important, they do not directly address the issue of feeling isolated and unsupported at work. Leaving the job may also not be the best option without first attempting to improve the situation. Making an effort to talk to people and be friendly himself is the most effective response as it can help to build relationships and create a more positive work environment."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:00:06.693326+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 169, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.8", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "c-b", "picked": null, "sampled": "Response: (c) Make an effort to talk to people and be friendly himself. \n\nExplanation: While having fun with friends outside of work hours and concentrating on doing work well are both important, they do not directly address the issue of feeling isolated and unsupported at work. Leaving the job may also not be the best option without first attempting to improve the situation. Making an effort to talk to people and be friendly himself is the most effective response as it can help to build relationships and create a more positive work environment.", "options": ["c-b"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:00:06.693380+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 170, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.43", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. The following questions each describe a situation, and ask you to choose which of five emotions is most likely to result from that situation. Here is an example: Clara receives a gift Clara is most likely to feel?  (a) happy (b) angry (c) frightened (d) bored (e) hungry. If you think Clara would feel happy, you would mark option A and then move to the next question. Select one or more response(s) by returning the one or more corresponding lowercase letter(s) ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd'), and, if you selected more than one, sorting them, separated by hyphen, in the order that you think best ranks them from most to least effective, within the context of the vignette provided."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Julie hasn't seen Ka for ages and looks forward to their weekend trip away. However, Ka has changed a lot and Julie finds that she is no longer an interesting companion. What action would be the most effective for Julie? (a) Cancel the trip and go home; (b) Realize that it is time to give up the friendship and move on; (c) Understand that people change, so move on, but remember the good times; (d) Concentrate on her other, more rewarding friendships."}], "sampled": ["(c) Understand that people change, so move on, but remember the good times."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:00:06.775456+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 171, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.43", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "c-d", "picked": null, "sampled": "(c) Understand that people change, so move on, but remember the good times.", "options": ["c-d"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:00:06.775514+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 172, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.68", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. The following questions each describe a situation, and ask you to choose which of five emotions is most likely to result from that situation. Here is an example: Clara receives a gift Clara is most likely to feel?  (a) happy (b) angry (c) frightened (d) bored (e) hungry. If you think Clara would feel happy, you would mark option A and then move to the next question. Select the most emotionally intelligent response by returning the one lowercase letter ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd') corresponding to that response."}, {"role": "user", "content": "An unwanted situation becomes less likely or stops altogether. The person involved is most likely to feel? (a) Regret; (b) Hope; (c) Joy; (d) Sadness; (e) Relief"}], "sampled": ["(e) Relief."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:00:07.020307+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 173, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.68", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "e", "picked": null, "sampled": "(e) Relief.", "options": ["e"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:00:07.020371+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 174, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.52", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. The following questions each describe a situation, and ask you to choose which of five emotions is most likely to result from that situation. Here is an example: Clara receives a gift Clara is most likely to feel?  (a) happy (b) angry (c) frightened (d) bored (e) hungry. If you think Clara would feel happy, you would mark option A and then move to the next question. Select the most emotionally intelligent response by returning the one lowercase letter ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd') corresponding to that response."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Song finds out that a friend of hers has borrowed money from others to pay urgent bills, but has in fact used the money for less serious purposes. Song is most likely to feel? (a) Anger; (b) Excitement; (c) Contempt; (d) Shame; (e) Horror"}], "sampled": ["(a) Anger"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:00:07.705377+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 175, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.52", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "c", "picked": null, "sampled": "(a) Anger", "options": ["c"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:00:07.705454+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 176, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.48", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. The following questions each describe a situation, and ask you to choose which of five emotions is most likely to result from that situation. Here is an example: Clara receives a gift Clara is most likely to feel?  (a) happy (b) angry (c) frightened (d) bored (e) hungry. If you think Clara would feel happy, you would mark option A and then move to the next question. Select the most emotionally intelligent response by returning the one lowercase letter ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd') corresponding to that response."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Regret is most likely to occur when? (a) Events are unexpected; (b) You have caused something you didn't want to happen and cannot change it; (c) Circumstances have caused something you didn't want to happen; (d) You have caused something you didn't want to happen and are trying to change it; (e) Events are getting beyond your control"}], "sampled": ["(b) You have caused something you didn't want to happen and cannot change it."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:00:07.864916+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 177, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.48", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "b", "picked": null, "sampled": "(b) You have caused something you didn't want to happen and cannot change it.", "options": ["b"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:00:07.864993+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 178, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.17", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from four responses the most effective course of action to manage both the emotions the person is feeling and the problems they face in that situation. Although more than one course of action might be acceptable, you are asked to choose what you think the most effective response for that person in that situation would be. Remember, you are not necessarily choosing what you would do, or the nicest thing to do, but choosing the most effective response for that situation. Select one or more response(s) by returning the one or more corresponding lowercase letter(s) ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd'), and, if you selected more than one, sorting them, separated by hyphen, in the order that you think best ranks them from most to least effective, within the context of the vignette provided."}, {"role": "user", "content": "A junior employee making routine adjustments to some of Teo's equipment accuses Teo of causing the equipment malfunction. What action would be the most effective for Teo? (a) Reprimand the employee for making such accusations; (b) Ignore the accusation, it is not important; (c) Explain that malfunctions were not his fault; (d) Learn more about using the equipment so that it doesn't break."}], "sampled": ["The most effective course of action for Teo would be to choose response (c) Explain that malfunctions were not his fault, and (d) Learn more about using the equipment so that it doesn't break. It is important for Teo to clarify the situation and defend himself against the accusation, but it is also important to take steps to prevent future malfunctions."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:00:07.887968+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 179, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.17", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "b-c", "picked": null, "sampled": "The most effective course of action for Teo would be to choose response (c) Explain that malfunctions were not his fault, and (d) Learn more about using the equipment so that it doesn't break. It is important for Teo to clarify the situation and defend himself against the accusation, but it is also important to take steps to prevent future malfunctions.", "options": ["b-c"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:00:07.888007+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 180, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.38", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from four responses the most effective course of action to manage both the emotions the person is feeling and the problems they face in that situation. Although more than one course of action might be acceptable, you are asked to choose what you think the most effective response for that person in that situation would be. Remember, you are not necessarily choosing what you would do, or the nicest thing to do, but choosing the most effective response for that situation. Select one or more response(s) by returning the one or more corresponding lowercase letter(s) ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd'), and, if you selected more than one, sorting them, separated by hyphen, in the order that you think best ranks them from most to least effective, within the context of the vignette provided."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Jill is given an official warning for entering a restricted area. She was never informed that the area was restricted and will lose her job if she gets two more warnings, which she thinks is unfair. What action would be the most effective for Jill? (a) Think about the unfairness of the situation; (b) Accept the warning and be careful not to go in restricted areas from now on; (c) Explain that she didn't know it was restricted; (d) Take a few deep breaths and calm down about it."}], "sampled": ["b - Accept the warning and be careful not to go in restricted areas from now on; c - Explain that she didn't know it was restricted. \n\nExplanation: \n\nOption (b) is the most effective response because it acknowledges the warning and takes responsibility for future actions. This response shows that Jill is willing to learn from her mistake and take steps to prevent it from happening again. \n\nOption (c) is also effective because it provides an explanation for Jill's actions and shows that she is not intentionally breaking the rules. This response may help to mitigate the severity of the warning and prevent future misunderstandings. \n\nOption (a) is not an effective response because it does not address the problem at hand and may lead to further negative emotions. \n\nOption (d) may be helpful for Jill to manage her emotions, but it does not address the problem or provide a solution."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:00:08.009034+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 181, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.38", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "b-c", "picked": null, "sampled": "b - Accept the warning and be careful not to go in restricted areas from now on; c - Explain that she didn't know it was restricted. \n\nExplanation: \n\nOption (b) is the most effective response because it acknowledges the warning and takes responsibility for future actions. This response shows that Jill is willing to learn from her mistake and take steps to prevent it from happening again. \n\nOption (c) is also effective because it provides an explanation for Jill's actions and shows that she is not intentionally breaking the rules. This response may help to mitigate the severity of the warning and prevent future misunderstandings. \n\nOption (a) is not an effective response because it does not address the problem at hand and may lead to further negative emotions. \n\nOption (d) may be helpful for Jill to manage her emotions, but it does not address the problem or provide a solution.", "options": ["b-c"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:00:08.009077+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 182, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.4", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from four responses the most effective course of action to manage both the emotions the person is feeling and the problems they face in that situation. Although more than one course of action might be acceptable, you are asked to choose what you think the most effective response for that person in that situation would be. Remember, you are not necessarily choosing what you would do, or the nicest thing to do, but choosing the most effective response for that situation. Select one or more response(s) by returning the one or more corresponding lowercase letter(s) ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd'), and, if you selected more than one, sorting them, separated by hyphen, in the order that you think best ranks them from most to least effective, within the context of the vignette provided."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Wai-Hin and Connie have shared an office for years but Wai-Hin gets a new job and Connie loses contact with her. What action would be the most effective for Connie? (a) Just accept that she is gone and the friendship is over; (b) Ring Wai-Hin an ask her out for lunch or coffee to catch up; (c) Contact Wai-Hin and arrange to catch up but also make friends with her replacement; (d) Spend time getting to know the other people in the office, and strike up new friendships."}], "sampled": ["(b) Ring Wai-Hin and ask her out for lunch or coffee to catch up."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:00:08.103548+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 183, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.4", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "c-d", "picked": null, "sampled": "(b) Ring Wai-Hin and ask her out for lunch or coffee to catch up.", "options": ["c-d"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:00:08.103587+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 184, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.0", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from four responses the most effective course of action to manage both the emotions the person is feeling and the problems they face in that situation. Although more than one course of action might be acceptable, you are asked to choose what you think the most effective response for that person in that situation would be. Remember, you are not necessarily choosing what you would do, or the nicest thing to do, but choosing the most effective response for that situation. Select one or more response(s) by returning the one or more corresponding lowercase letter(s) ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd'), and, if you selected more than one, sorting them, separated by hyphen, in the order that you think best ranks them from most to least effective, within the context of the vignette provided."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Lee's workmate fails to deliver an important piece of information on time, causing Lee to fall behind schedule also. What action would be the most effective for Lee? (a) Work harder to compensate; (b) Get angry with the workmate; (c) Explain the urgency of the situation to the workmate; (d) Never rely on that workmate again."}], "sampled": ["The most effective course of action for Lee would be to (c) explain the urgency of the situation to the workmate. This would help the workmate understand the impact of their actions and hopefully prevent similar situations from happening in the future. Option (a) may lead to burnout and is not a sustainable solution. Option (b) may damage the relationship with the workmate and create a negative work environment. Option (d) is not a productive solution and may limit Lee's ability to work effectively with others in the future."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:00:08.395096+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 185, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.0", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "c", "picked": null, "sampled": "The most effective course of action for Lee would be to (c) explain the urgency of the situation to the workmate. This would help the workmate understand the impact of their actions and hopefully prevent similar situations from happening in the future. Option (a) may lead to burnout and is not a sustainable solution. Option (b) may damage the relationship with the workmate and create a negative work environment. Option (d) is not a productive solution and may limit Lee's ability to work effectively with others in the future.", "options": ["c"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:00:08.395134+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 186, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.98", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from among four responses what you would be most likely to do in the situation. Please note, there are no right or wrong answers. We all deal with situations in different ways. All that you need to do is answer each question honestly. Select one or more response(s) by returning the one or more corresponding lowercase letter(s) ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd'), and, if you selected more than one, sorting them, separated by hyphen, in the order that you think best ranks them from most to least effective, within the context of the vignette provided."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You were always involved in soccer and are a very good player. You move to a new school in a community that has a lot of sports activities, but no soccer. You miss playing soccer, but are concerned about starting another sport. What would you do in this situation? (a) Talk to your parents and teachers about starting a soccer league in the new community; (b) Think about your skills and choose another sport that would use those skills (running or kicking); (c) Give up on sports; (d) Play pick-up games in an empty lot with a few friends after school"}], "sampled": ["a) Talk to your parents and teachers about starting a soccer league in the new community; b) Think about your skills and choose another sport that would use those skills (running or kicking)"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:00:08.933250+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 187, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.98", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "a-b-c-d", "picked": null, "sampled": "a) Talk to your parents and teachers about starting a soccer league in the new community; b) Think about your skills and choose another sport that would use those skills (running or kicking)", "options": ["a-b-c-d"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:00:08.933290+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 188, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.99", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from among four responses what you would be most likely to do in the situation. Please note, there are no right or wrong answers. We all deal with situations in different ways. All that you need to do is answer each question honestly. Select one or more response(s) by returning the one or more corresponding lowercase letter(s) ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd'), and, if you selected more than one, sorting them, separated by hyphen, in the order that you think best ranks them from most to least effective, within the context of the vignette provided."}, {"role": "user", "content": "You are given a warning by your teacher for having entered a restricted area. You were never informed that the area was restricted and will do detention if you get two more warnings, which you think is unfair. What would you do in this situation? (a) Explain that you didn't know the area was restricted; (b) Accept the warning and be careful not to go in the restricted area from now on; (c) Take a few deep breaths and calm down about the situation; (d) Spend a lot of time complaining to your friends about this"}], "sampled": ["a - Explain that you didn't know the area was restricted. b - Accept the warning and be careful not to go in the restricted area from now on. c - Take a few deep breaths and calm down about the situation. \n\nExplanation: It is important to communicate with the teacher and explain that you were not aware of the restricted area. However, it is also important to accept the warning and be more careful in the future. Taking a few deep breaths and calming down can help you approach the situation in a more rational manner. Complaining to friends may not be productive and may only increase negative emotions."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:00:11.289472+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 189, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.99", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "b-a-d-c", "picked": null, "sampled": "a - Explain that you didn't know the area was restricted. b - Accept the warning and be careful not to go in the restricted area from now on. c - Take a few deep breaths and calm down about the situation. \n\nExplanation: It is important to communicate with the teacher and explain that you were not aware of the restricted area. However, it is also important to accept the warning and be more careful in the future. Taking a few deep breaths and calming down can help you approach the situation in a more rational manner. Complaining to friends may not be productive and may only increase negative emotions.", "options": ["b-a-d-c"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:00:11.289511+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 190, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.42", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from four responses the most effective course of action to manage both the emotions the person is feeling and the problems they face in that situation. Although more than one course of action might be acceptable, you are asked to choose what you think the most effective response for that person in that situation would be. Remember, you are not necessarily choosing what you would do, or the nicest thing to do, but choosing the most effective response for that situation. Select one or more response(s) by returning the one or more corresponding lowercase letter(s) ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd'), and, if you selected more than one, sorting them, separated by hyphen, in the order that you think best ranks them from most to least effective, within the context of the vignette provided."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Jacob is having a large family gathering to celebrate him moving into his new home. He wants the day to go smoothly and is a little nervous about it. What action would be the most effective for Jacob? (a) Talk to friends or relatives to ease his worries; (b) Try to calm down, perhaps go for a short walk or meditate; (c) Prepare ahead of time so he has everything he needs available; (d) Accept that things aren't going to be perfect but the family will understand."}], "sampled": ["Ranking: b, c, a, d\n\nThe most effective course of action for Jacob would be to try to calm down, perhaps go for a short walk or meditate. This will help him to relax and reduce his nervousness. The next best option would be to prepare ahead of time so he has everything he needs available, which will help him feel more in control of the situation. Talking to friends or relatives to ease his worries could also be helpful, but it may not be as effective as the first two options. Finally, accepting that things aren't going to be perfect but the family will understand is not the most effective course of action, as it does not address his nervousness and may lead to a less enjoyable experience for him."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:00:13.031700+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 191, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.42", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "c-d-a-b", "picked": null, "sampled": "Ranking: b, c, a, d\n\nThe most effective course of action for Jacob would be to try to calm down, perhaps go for a short walk or meditate. This will help him to relax and reduce his nervousness. The next best option would be to prepare ahead of time so he has everything he needs available, which will help him feel more in control of the situation. Talking to friends or relatives to ease his worries could also be helpful, but it may not be as effective as the first two options. Finally, accepting that things aren't going to be perfect but the family will understand is not the most effective course of action, as it does not address his nervousness and may lead to a less enjoyable experience for him.", "options": ["c-d-a-b"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:00:13.031759+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 192, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.13", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from four responses the most effective course of action to manage both the emotions the person is feeling and the problems they face in that situation. Although more than one course of action might be acceptable, you are asked to choose what you think the most effective response for that person in that situation would be. Remember, you are not necessarily choosing what you would do, or the nicest thing to do, but choosing the most effective response for that situation. Select one or more response(s) by returning the one or more corresponding lowercase letter(s) ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd'), and, if you selected more than one, sorting them, separated by hyphen, in the order that you think best ranks them from most to least effective, within the context of the vignette provided."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Katerina takes a long time to set the DVD timer. With the family watching, her sister says You idiot, you're doing it all wrong, can't you work the video?d Katerina is quite close to her sister and family. What action would be the most effective for Katerina? (a) Ignore her sister and keep at the task; (b) Get her sister to help or to do it; (c) Tell her sister she is being mean; (d) Never work appliances in front of her sister or family again."}], "sampled": ["(c) Tell her sister she is being mean; (a) Ignore her sister and keep at the task. \n\nIt is important to address the sister's hurtful comment and let her know that it is not acceptable to speak to Katerina in that way. This can help prevent similar situations from happening in the future. However, it is also important for Katerina to continue with the task at hand and not let her sister's comment discourage her. Ignoring her sister and focusing on the task can help Katerina feel more confident and capable."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:00:13.032368+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 193, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.13", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "b-a-c", "picked": null, "sampled": "(c) Tell her sister she is being mean; (a) Ignore her sister and keep at the task. \n\nIt is important to address the sister's hurtful comment and let her know that it is not acceptable to speak to Katerina in that way. This can help prevent similar situations from happening in the future. However, it is also important for Katerina to continue with the task at hand and not let her sister's comment discourage her. Ignoring her sister and focusing on the task can help Katerina feel more confident and capable.", "options": ["b-a-c"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:00:13.032412+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 194, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.11", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from four responses the most effective course of action to manage both the emotions the person is feeling and the problems they face in that situation. Although more than one course of action might be acceptable, you are asked to choose what you think the most effective response for that person in that situation would be. Remember, you are not necessarily choosing what you would do, or the nicest thing to do, but choosing the most effective response for that situation. Select one or more response(s) by returning the one or more corresponding lowercase letter(s) ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd'), and, if you selected more than one, sorting them, separated by hyphen, in the order that you think best ranks them from most to least effective, within the context of the vignette provided."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Helga's team has been performing very well. They receive poor-quality work from another team that they must incorporate into their own project. What action would be the most effective for Helga? (a) Don't worry about it; (b) Tell the other team they must re-do their work; (c) Tell the project manager about the situation; (d) Re-do the other team's work to get it up to scratch."}], "sampled": ["(c) Tell the project manager about the situation; (d) Re-do the other team's work to get it up to scratch. \n\nExplanation: \nOption (a) is not an effective response as it ignores the problem and does not address the emotions or the issue at hand. Option (b) may cause conflict and damage relationships between the teams, which could negatively impact the project. Option (c) is the most effective response as it involves bringing the issue to the attention of the project manager, who can then take appropriate action to address the problem. Option (d) is also an effective response as it ensures that the project is not negatively impacted by poor-quality work, but it should be done after informing the project manager."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:00:15.351964+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 195, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.11", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "c-b", "picked": null, "sampled": "(c) Tell the project manager about the situation; (d) Re-do the other team's work to get it up to scratch. \n\nExplanation: \nOption (a) is not an effective response as it ignores the problem and does not address the emotions or the issue at hand. Option (b) may cause conflict and damage relationships between the teams, which could negatively impact the project. Option (c) is the most effective response as it involves bringing the issue to the attention of the project manager, who can then take appropriate action to address the problem. Option (d) is also an effective response as it ensures that the project is not negatively impacted by poor-quality work, but it should be done after informing the project manager.", "options": ["c-b"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:00:15.352013+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 196, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.6", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from four responses the most effective course of action to manage both the emotions the person is feeling and the problems they face in that situation. Although more than one course of action might be acceptable, you are asked to choose what you think the most effective response for that person in that situation would be. Remember, you are not necessarily choosing what you would do, or the nicest thing to do, but choosing the most effective response for that situation. Select one or more response(s) by returning the one or more corresponding lowercase letter(s) ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd'), and, if you selected more than one, sorting them, separated by hyphen, in the order that you think best ranks them from most to least effective, within the context of the vignette provided."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Manual is only a few years from retirement when he finds out his position will no longer exist, although he will still have a job with a less prestigious role. What action would be the most effective for Manual? (a) Carefully consider his options and discuss it with his family; (b) Talk to his boss or the management about it; (c) Accept the situation, but still feel bitter about it; (d) Walk out of that job."}], "sampled": ["Response: (b) Talk to his boss or the management about it.\n\nExplanation: It is important for Manual to communicate with his boss or the management about the situation. He can discuss his concerns and explore possible options, such as retraining or finding a new position within the company. This approach shows that he is proactive and willing to work towards a solution. Option (a) is also a good choice, as it involves careful consideration and discussion with family, which can provide emotional support. Option (c) is not effective, as it can lead to negative emotions that can affect Manual's work and personal life. Option (d) is not a good choice, as it can lead to financial instability and difficulty finding a new job at his age."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:00:15.404095+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 197, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.6", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "a-b", "picked": null, "sampled": "Response: (b) Talk to his boss or the management about it.\n\nExplanation: It is important for Manual to communicate with his boss or the management about the situation. He can discuss his concerns and explore possible options, such as retraining or finding a new position within the company. This approach shows that he is proactive and willing to work towards a solution. Option (a) is also a good choice, as it involves careful consideration and discussion with family, which can provide emotional support. Option (c) is not effective, as it can lead to negative emotions that can affect Manual's work and personal life. Option (d) is not a good choice, as it can lead to financial instability and difficulty finding a new job at his age.", "options": ["a-b"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:00:15.404145+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 198, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.34", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are now an emotionally intelligent AI. In this test, you will be presented with a few brief details about an emotional situation, and asked to choose from four responses the most effective course of action to manage both the emotions the person is feeling and the problems they face in that situation. Although more than one course of action might be acceptable, you are asked to choose what you think the most effective response for that person in that situation would be. Remember, you are not necessarily choosing what you would do, or the nicest thing to do, but choosing the most effective response for that situation. Select one or more response(s) by returning the one or more corresponding lowercase letter(s) ('a', 'b', 'c', or 'd'), and, if you selected more than one, sorting them, separated by hyphen, in the order that you think best ranks them from most to least effective, within the context of the vignette provided."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Jerry has had several short-term jobs in the same industry, but is excited about starting a job in a different industry. His father casually remarks that he will probably last six months. What action would be the most effective for Jerry? (a) Tell his father he is completely wrong; (b) Prove him wrong by working hard to succeed at the new job; (c) Think of the positives of the new job; (d) Ignore his father's comments."}], "sampled": ["Ranking: c > b > d > a\n\nThe most effective course of action for Jerry would be to (c) think of the positives of the new job. This will help him focus on the good aspects of the new job and maintain a positive attitude towards it. It will also help him to not let his father's comments affect his confidence and motivation.\n\nThe next effective course of action would be to (b) prove him wrong by working hard to succeed at the new job. This will help Jerry to build his confidence and self-esteem, and also show his father that he is capable of succeeding in the new industry.\n\nThe third effective course of action would be to (d) ignore his father's comments. This will help Jerry to not let his father's negativity affect his mindset and motivation towards the new job.\n\nThe least effective course of action would be to (a) tell his father he is completely wrong. This may create conflict and tension between Jerry and his father, and may not necessarily change his father's opinion."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:00:18.458856+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230418175936LL67AFVH", "event_id": 199, "sample_id": "emotional-intelligence.dev.34", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "d-b-c", "picked": null, "sampled": "Ranking: c > b > d > a\n\nThe most effective course of action for Jerry would be to (c) think of the positives of the new job. This will help him focus on the good aspects of the new job and maintain a positive attitude towards it. It will also help him to not let his father's comments affect his confidence and motivation.\n\nThe next effective course of action would be to (b) prove him wrong by working hard to succeed at the new job. This will help Jerry to build his confidence and self-esteem, and also show his father that he is capable of succeeding in the new industry.\n\nThe third effective course of action would be to (d) ignore his father's comments. This will help Jerry to not let his father's negativity affect his mindset and motivation towards the new job.\n\nThe least effective course of action would be to (a) tell his father he is completely wrong. This may create conflict and tension between Jerry and his father, and may not necessarily change his father's opinion.", "options": ["d-b-c"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-18 18:00:18.458900+00:00"}
-{"final_report": {"accuracy": 0.02}}
diff --git a/evals/evals.yaml b/evals/evals.yaml
index 9b3b0731626b8b937655f9754524b4c6eba991a2..23b711752561d790465fdcc019a2e3a51d8b2e38 100644
--- a/evals/evals.yaml
+++ b/evals/evals.yaml
@@ -2,11 +2,26 @@
     results-file: ./crossword/crossword-turbo.jsonl
     second-results-file: ./crossword/crossword-4.jsonl
     functions-file: ./crossword/crossword_fns.py
-    link: https://github.com/openai/evals/tree/main/evals/registry/data/partially_solved_crossword_clues
-- us-tort-law:
-    results-file: ./us-tort-law/us-tort-law-turbo.jsonl
-    link: https://github.com/openai/evals/tree/main/evals/registry/data/us-tort-law
-- emotional-intelligence:
-    results-file: ./emotional-intelligence/emotional-intelligence-turbo.jsonl
-    second-results-file: ./emotional-intelligence/emotional-intelligence-0301.jsonl
-    link: https://github.com/openai/evals/tree/main/evals/registry/data/emotional-intelligence
+    link: https://github.com/openai/evals/commit/fa192552a19c297c65a8a398ede53b62a289ab9c
+    description: Given a clue and a partially filled crossword answer, provide the filled in answer
+- country-area:
+    results-file: ./country-area/countries-turbo.jsonl
+    second-results-file: ./country-area/countries-4.jsonl
+    functions-file: ./country-area/country_fns.py
+    link: https://github.com/openai/evals/commit/24dae81ae06ebc70808690c7a147f2710e3e54bf
+    description: Select the country with the biggest area from a list of countries
+- med-mcqa:
+    results-file: ./medmcqa/med-3.5-turbo.jsonl
+    second-results-file: ./medmcqa/med-4.jsonl
+    link: https://github.com/openai/evals/commit/19b2cf9ff96b08af68f5c3b4d2c90184844a4fe6
+    description: Multiple choice questions from different medical areas.
+- aba-mrpc:
+    results-file: ./aba-mrpc-true-false/aba-3.5-turbo.jsonl
+    second-results-file: ./aba-mrpc-true-false/aba-4.jsonl
+    link: https://github.com/openai/evals/commit/9badb0395b696958e539f001e62d377ed0e237de
+    description: True/False questions based on the American Bar Association's Model Rules of Professional Conduct
+- logic-statements:
+    results-file: ./logic/logic-turbo.jsonl
+    second-results-file: ./logic/logic-4.jsonl
+    link: https://github.com/openai/evals/commit/81b959c37c7ed2ffe0c4c145e9e3eee955d27cc3
+    description: Tests of simple logical reasoning statements.
diff --git a/evals/logic/logic-4.jsonl b/evals/logic/logic-4.jsonl
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d0c143e27c89e32dd5d11d35dfdc68b313c4b292
--- /dev/null
+++ b/evals/logic/logic-4.jsonl
@@ -0,0 +1,332 @@
+{"spec": {"completion_fns": ["gpt-4"], "eval_name": "logic-statements.dev.v0", "base_eval": "logic-statements", "split": "dev", "run_config": {"completion_fns": ["gpt-4"], "eval_spec": {"cls": "evals.elsuite.basic.fuzzy_match:FuzzyMatch", "args": {"samples_jsonl": "logic-statements/logic-statements.jsonl"}, "key": "logic-statements.dev.v0", "group": "logic-statements"}, "seed": 20220722, "max_samples": null, "command": "/Users/acabrera/dev-research/22-zeno/openai-eval/evals/evals/cli/oaieval.py gpt-4 logic-statements", "initial_settings": {"visible": true}}, "created_by": "", "run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:12.604480"}}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 0, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.57", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All pens are writing utensils, some writing utensils are black, therefore some pens are black. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let P be the set of pens, W be the set of writing utensils"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:15.045305+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 1, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.57", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:15.045750+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 3, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.59", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All kittens are cats, some cats are playful, therefore some kittens are playful. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let K be the set of kittens, C be the set of cats, and"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:15.071708+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 4, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.59", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:15.071794+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 6, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.18", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All hurricanes are storms, some storms are destructive, therefore some hurricanes are destructive. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let H be the set of all hurricanes, S be the set of all storms"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:15.140022+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 7, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.18", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:15.140085+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 9, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.94", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All lions are cats, some cats are agile, therefore some lions are agile. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let L be the set of lions, C be the set of cats, and"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:15.151624+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 10, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.94", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:15.151690+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 12, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.157", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some computers are powerful, some computers are stylish, therefore some powerful computers are stylish. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let A be the set of powerful computers, B be the set of stylish computers"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:15.156342+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 13, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.157", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:15.156447+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 15, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.3", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All salmon are fish, some fish are pink, therefore some salmon are pink. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let S be the set of all salmon, F be the set of all fish"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:15.404696+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 16, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.3", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:15.404846+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 18, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.118", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some mountains are tall, some mountains are snow-capped, therefore some tall mountains are snow-capped. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let M be the set of mountains, T be the set of tall mountains,"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:15.480482+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 19, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.118", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:15.480582+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 21, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.145", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some horses are brown, some horses are strong, therefore some brown horses are strong. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let H be the set of horses, B be the set of brown things,"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:15.820659+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 22, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.145", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:15.820739+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 24, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.38", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some cars are electric, some cars are fuel-efficient, therefore some electric cars are fuel-efficient. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let A be the set of electric cars, B be the set of fuel-efficient"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:15.843237+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 25, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.38", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:15.843323+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 27, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.90", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All apples are fruits, some fruits are firm, therefore some apples are firm. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let A be the set of apples, F be the set of fruits, and"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:15.920967+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 28, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.90", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:15.921129+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 30, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.128", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some flowers are fragrant, some flowers are bright, therefore some fragrant flowers are bright. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let F be the set of flowers, G be the set of fragrant flowers"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:17.564955+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 31, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.128", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:17.565104+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 33, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.141", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some oranges are orange, some oranges are juicy, therefore some orange oranges are juicy. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let A be the set of oranges, B be the set of orange things,"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:17.565702+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 34, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.141", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:17.565793+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 36, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.149", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some books are hardcover, some books are old, therefore some hardcover books are old. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let A be the set of hardcover books, B be the set of old"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:17.854953+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 37, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.149", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:17.855118+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 39, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.19", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All oranges are citrus fruits, some citrus fruits are sour, therefore some oranges are sour. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let O represent the set of oranges, C represent the set of citrus fruits,"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:18.280570+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 40, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.19", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:18.280669+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 42, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.79", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All birds are animals, some animals are colorful, therefore some birds are colorful. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let B represent the set of birds, A represent the set of animals, and"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:18.281528+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 43, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.79", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:18.281577+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 45, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.25", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some turtles are old, some turtles are young, therefore some old turtles are young. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let T be the set of turtles, O be the set of old things,"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:18.282092+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 46, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.25", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:18.282133+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 48, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.14", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All stars are luminous bodies, some luminous bodies are bright, therefore some stars are bright. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let A be the set of stars, B be the set of luminous bodies"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:18.393560+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 49, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.14", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "NO", "picked": ["Let A be the set of stars, B be the set of luminous bodies"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:18.393680+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 51, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.152", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some shirts are polka-dotted, some shirts are long-sleeved, therefore some polka-dotted shirts are long-sleeved. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let S be the set of shirts, P be the set of polka-d"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:18.791616+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 52, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.152", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:18.791751+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 54, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.31", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some rocks are big, some rocks are gray, therefore some big rocks are gray. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let A be the set of big rocks, B be the set of gray rocks"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:18.797925+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 55, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.31", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:18.798026+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 57, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.126", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some oranges are juicy, some oranges are round, therefore some juicy oranges are round. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let A be the set of oranges, B be the set of juicy things,"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:18.943748+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 58, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.126", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:18.943933+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 60, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.101", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All kittens are cats, some cats are cuddly, therefore some kittens are cuddly. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let K represent the set of kittens, C represent the set of cats, and"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:19.901414+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 61, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.101", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:19.901539+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 63, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.161", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some houses are big, some houses are yellow, therefore some big houses are yellow. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let A be the set of big houses, B be the set of yellow houses"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:19.995815+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 64, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.161", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:19.995936+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 66, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.89", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All cars are vehicles, some vehicles are modern, therefore some cars are modern. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let C be the set of cars, V be the set of vehicles, and"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:20.308699+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 67, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.89", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:20.308881+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 69, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.37", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some houses are big, some houses are expensive, therefore some big houses are expensive. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let A be the set of big houses, B be the set of expensive houses"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:20.370200+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 70, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.37", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:20.370319+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 72, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.15", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All alpacas are mammals, some mammals are domesticated, therefore some alpacas are domesticated. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let A be the set of alpacas, M be the set of mammals"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:20.712566+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 73, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.15", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:20.712641+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 75, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.20", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All rabbits are mammals, some mammals are small, therefore some rabbits are small. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let R be the set of rabbits, M be the set of mammals, and"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:21.760698+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 76, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.20", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:21.760815+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 78, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.93", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All birds are animals, some animals are graceful, therefore some birds are graceful. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let B be the set of birds, A be the set of animals, and"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:21.763758+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 79, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.93", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:21.763886+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 81, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.119", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some strawberries are ripe, some strawberries are sweet, therefore some ripe strawberries are sweet. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let A be the set of ripe strawberries, B be the set of sweet strawberries"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:21.777840+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 82, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.119", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:21.777917+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 84, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.44", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All pencils are writing utensils, some writing utensils are yellow, therefore some pencils are yellow. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let P be the set of pencils, W be the set of writing utensils"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:22.048710+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 85, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.44", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:22.048852+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 87, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.78", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All trees are plants, some plants are green, therefore some trees are green. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let T be the set of trees, P be the set of plants, and"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:22.059925+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 88, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.78", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:22.060023+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 90, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.91", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All puppies are dogs, some dogs are energetic, therefore some puppies are energetic. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["NO"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:22.299756+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 91, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.91", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "NO", "picked": ["NO"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:22.299907+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 93, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.56", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All tigers are cats, some cats are striped, therefore some tigers are striped. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let T represent the set of tigers, C represent the set of cats,"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:22.889045+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 94, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.56", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:22.889171+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 96, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.95", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All pencils are writing utensils, some writing utensils are wooden, therefore some pencils are wooden. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let P be the set of pencils, W be the set of wooden objects,"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:23.174375+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 97, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.95", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:23.174473+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 99, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.35", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some laptops are cheap, some laptops are powerful, therefore some cheap laptops are powerful. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let L be the set of laptops, C be the set of cheap things,"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:23.426534+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 100, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.35", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:23.436314+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 102, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.148", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some cakes are sweet, some cakes are delicious, therefore some sweet cakes are delicious. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let A be the set of sweet cakes, B be the set of delicious cakes"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:23.488078+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 103, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.148", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:23.488150+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 105, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.52", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All apples are fruits, some fruits are sweet, therefore some apples are sweet. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let A be the set of apples, F be the set of fruits, and"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:25.040864+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 106, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.52", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:25.041020+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 108, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.92", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All trees are plants, some plants have bark, therefore some trees have bark. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let T be the set of trees, P be the set of plants, and"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:25.113249+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 109, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.92", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:25.113351+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 111, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.131", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some apples are green, some apples are juicy, therefore some green apples are juicy. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let A be the set of apples, G be the set of green things,"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:25.129666+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 112, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.131", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:25.129752+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 114, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.117", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some dogs are loyal, some dogs are friendly, therefore some loyal dogs are friendly. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let A be the set of loyal dogs, B be the set of friendly dogs"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:25.251039+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 115, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.117", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:25.251209+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 117, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.132", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some birds are chirping, some birds are colorful, therefore some chirping birds are colorful. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let A be the set of chirping birds, B be the set of colorful"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:25.419611+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 118, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.132", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:25.419824+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 120, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.129", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some clouds are white, some clouds are fluffy, therefore some white clouds are fluffy. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let A be the set of white clouds, B be the set of fluffy clouds"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:25.540446+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 121, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.129", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:25.540545+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 123, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.6", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All flowers are plants, some plants are green, therefore some flowers are green. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let F be the set of flowers, P be the set of plants, and"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:25.708942+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 124, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.6", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:25.709011+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 126, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.140", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some dogs are loyal, some dogs are playful, therefore some loyal dogs are playful. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let A be the set of loyal dogs, B be the set of playful dogs"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:25.894181+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 127, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.140", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:25.894302+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 129, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.112", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some computers are powerful, some computers are portable, therefore some powerful computers are portable. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let A be the set of powerful computers, B be the set of portable computers"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:26.123744+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 130, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.112", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:26.123866+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 132, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.159", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some cars are hybrid, some cars are fuel-efficient, therefore some hybrid cars are fuel-efficient. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let A represent hybrid cars, B represent fuel-efficient cars, and C represent all"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:26.206670+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 133, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.159", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:26.206751+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 135, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.12", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All apples are fruits, some fruits are yellow, therefore some apples are yellow. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["NO"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:26.243707+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 136, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.12", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "NO", "picked": ["NO"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:26.243764+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 138, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.71", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All pens are writing utensils, some writing utensils are blue, therefore some pens are blue. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let P be the set of pens, W be the set of writing utensils"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:27.599087+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 139, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.71", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:27.599204+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 141, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.48", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All birds are animals, some animals are small, therefore some birds are small. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["NO"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:27.863702+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 142, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.48", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "NO", "picked": ["NO"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:27.863767+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 144, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.99", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All pens are writing utensils, some writing utensils are plastic, therefore some pens are plastic. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let P be the set of pens, W be the set of writing utensils"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:28.096467+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 145, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.99", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:28.096567+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 147, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.142", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some flowers are fragrant, some flowers are small, therefore some fragrant flowers are small. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let F be the set of flowers, G be the set of fragrant flowers"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:28.101985+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 148, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.142", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:28.102080+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 150, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.16", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All monkeys are primates, some primates are intelligent, therefore some monkeys are intelligent. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let M be the set of monkeys, P be the set of primates,"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:28.138815+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 151, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.16", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:28.138932+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 153, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.54", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All roses are flowers, some flowers are fragrant, therefore some roses are fragrant. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let R be the set of roses, F be the set of flowers, and"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:28.216984+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 154, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.54", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:28.217098+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 156, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.75", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All cars are vehicles, some vehicles have engines, therefore some cars have engines. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let A be the set of cars, B be the set of vehicles, and"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:28.316907+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 157, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.75", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:28.317116+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 159, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.144", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some tables are wooden, some tables are sturdy, therefore some wooden tables are sturdy. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let A be the set of wooden tables, B be the set of sturdy tables"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:28.325606+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 160, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.144", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:28.325726+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 162, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.8", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All red wine is wine, some wine is fruity, therefore some red wine is fruity. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let A be the set of red wines, B be the set of wines,"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:28.537720+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 163, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.8", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:28.537782+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 165, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.28", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some jeans are blue, some jeans are ripped, therefore some jeans are blue and ripped. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["NO"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:29.146914+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 166, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.28", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "NO", "picked": ["NO"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:29.147598+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 168, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.113", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some cats are fluffy, some cats are playful, therefore some fluffy cats are playful. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let A be the set of cats, B be the set of fluffy things,"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:29.402460+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 169, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.113", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:29.402535+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 171, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.63", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All puppies are dogs, some dogs are friendly, therefore some puppies are friendly. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["NO"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:29.715853+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 172, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.63", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "NO", "picked": ["NO"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:29.715922+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 174, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.30", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some grapes are green, some grapes are sour, therefore some green grapes are sour. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let G be the set of green grapes, S be the set of sour grapes"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:30.669195+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 175, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.30", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:30.669274+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 177, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.115", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some birds are small, some birds are colorful, therefore some small birds are colorful. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let A be the set of small birds, B be the set of colorful birds"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:30.703056+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 178, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.115", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:30.703128+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 180, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.150", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some chairs are modern, some chairs are wooden, therefore some modern chairs are wooden. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let C be the set of chairs, M be the set of modern things,"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:30.893966+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 181, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.150", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:30.894025+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 183, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.69", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All horses are animals, some animals run fast, therefore some horses run fast. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let H be the set of horses, A be the set of animals, and"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:30.962512+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 184, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.69", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:30.962572+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 186, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.130", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some rocks are gray, some rocks are smooth, therefore some gray rocks are smooth. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let G be the set of gray rocks, S be the set of smooth rocks"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:31.066276+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 187, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.130", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:31.066342+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 189, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.138", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some shirts are red, some shirts are long-sleeved, therefore some red shirts are long-sleeved. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let S be the set of shirts, R be the set of red shirts,"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:31.196759+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 190, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.138", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:31.196822+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 192, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.88", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All mountains are landforms, some landforms are steep, therefore some mountains are steep. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let M be the set of mountains, L be the set of landforms,"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:31.238578+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 193, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.88", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:31.238643+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 195, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.133", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some cats are purring, some cats are playful, therefore some purring cats are playful. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let A be the set of purring cats, B be the set of playful"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:31.403295+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 196, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.133", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:31.403385+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 198, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.7", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All gold is metal, some metals are black, therefore some gold is black. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let G be the set of all gold, M be the set of all metals"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:31.856905+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 199, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.7", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:31.857004+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 201, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.29", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some containers are full, some containers are empty, therefore some containers are neither full nor empty. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["NO"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:32.207660+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 202, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.29", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "NO", "picked": ["NO"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:32.207711+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 204, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.64", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All trees are plants, some plants are evergreen, therefore some trees are evergreen. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let T represent the set of trees, P represent the set of plants, and"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:32.267628+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 205, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.64", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:32.267703+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 207, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.73", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All kittens are cats, some cats are fluffy, therefore some kittens are fluffy. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["NO"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:32.932572+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 208, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.73", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "NO", "picked": ["NO"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:32.932626+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 210, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.51", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All airplanes are vehicles, some vehicles are loud, therefore some airplanes are loud. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let A be the set of airplanes, V be the set of vehicles, and"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:33.306176+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 211, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.51", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:33.306239+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 213, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.46", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All puppies are dogs, some dogs are cute, therefore some puppies are cute. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let P be the set of puppies, D be the set of dogs, and"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:33.394288+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 214, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.46", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:33.394407+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 216, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.109", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some flowers are fragrant, some flowers are beautiful, therefore some fragrant flowers are beautiful. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let F be the set of flowers, G be the set of fragrant flowers"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:33.511003+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 217, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.109", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:33.521859+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 219, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.135", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some trees are tall, some trees are green, therefore some tall trees are green. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let A be the set of tall trees, B be the set of green trees"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:33.736090+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 220, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.135", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:33.736161+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 222, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.45", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All apples are fruits, some fruits are red, therefore some apples are red. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let A be the set of apples, F be the set of fruits, and"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:33.850926+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 223, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.45", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:33.851082+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 225, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.2", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All dogs are animals, some animals have four legs, therefore some dogs have four legs. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let D be the set of dogs, A be the set of animals, and"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:33.993875+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 226, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.2", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:33.993997+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 228, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.24", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some cars have a sunroof, some cars are fast, therefore some fast cars have a sunroof. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let A be the set of cars with a sunroof, B be the set"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:34.158179+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 229, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.24", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:34.158261+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 231, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.83", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All horses are animals, some animals have tails, therefore some horses have tails. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let H be the set of horses, A be the set of animals, and"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:34.369029+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 232, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.83", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:34.369102+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 234, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.49", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All mountains are landforms, some landforms are tall, therefore some mountains are tall. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let M be the set of mountains, L be the set of landforms,"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:34.673679+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 235, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.49", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:34.673747+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 237, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.58", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All oranges are fruits, some fruits are juicy, therefore some oranges are juicy. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let O represent the set of oranges, F represent the set of fruits, and"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:35.395252+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 238, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.58", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:35.395320+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 240, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.158", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some dogs are friendly, some dogs are small, therefore some friendly dogs are small. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let A be the set of dogs, B be the set of friendly things,"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:36.712316+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 241, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.158", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:36.712435+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 243, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.33", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some cats are playful, some cats are furry, therefore some playful cats are furry. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let A be the set of playful cats, B be the set of furry cats"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:36.788760+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 244, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.33", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:36.788859+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 246, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.108", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some cars are hybrid, some cars are fuel-efficient, therefore some hybrid cars are fuel-efficient. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let A represent the set of hybrid cars, B represent the set of fuel-efficient"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:36.821675+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 247, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.108", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:36.821823+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 249, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.70", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All tigers are cats, some cats are big, therefore some tigers are big. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let T represent the set of tigers, C represent the set of cats,"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:36.972277+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 250, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.70", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:36.972377+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 252, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.84", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All tigers are cats, some cats are wild, therefore some tigers are wild. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let T represent the set of tigers, C represent the set of cats,"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:37.147950+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 253, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.84", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:37.148049+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 255, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.42", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All horses are animals, some animals have hooves, therefore some horses have hooves. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let H be the set of horses, A be the set of animals, and"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:37.172293+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 256, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.42", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:37.172430+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 258, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.121", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some bananas are yellow, some bananas are ripe, therefore some yellow bananas are ripe. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let A be the set of yellow bananas, B be the set of ripe bananas"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:37.237508+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 259, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.121", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:37.237743+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 261, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.21", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some horses are black, some horses are warm-blooded, therefore some black horses are warm-blooded. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let A represent the set of black horses, B represent the set of warm-blood"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:37.439606+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 262, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.21", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:37.439723+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 264, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.10", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All planets are celestial bodies, some celestial bodies are stars, therefore some planets are stars. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let P be the set of planets, C be the set of celestial bodies,"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:37.568892+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 265, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.10", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:37.568987+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 267, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.100", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All oranges are fruits, some fruits are aromatic, therefore some oranges are aromatic. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["NO"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:37.767594+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 268, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.100", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "NO", "picked": ["NO"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:37.767651+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 270, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.76", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All apples are fruits, some fruits are tart, therefore some apples are tart. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["NO"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:38.660085+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 271, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.76", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "NO", "picked": ["NO"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:38.660163+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 273, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.134", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some cookies are sweet, some cookies are crunchy, therefore some sweet cookies are crunchy. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let A be the set of sweet cookies, B be the set of crunchy cookies"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:39.185727+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 274, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.134", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:39.185830+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 276, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.124", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some cars are electric, some cars are fast, therefore some electric cars are fast. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let A be the set of electric cars, B be the set of fast cars"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:39.230023+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 277, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.124", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:39.230137+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 279, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.47", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All trees are plants, some plants have leaves, therefore some trees have leaves. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let T be the set of trees, P be the set of plants, and"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:39.336186+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 280, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.47", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:39.336254+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 282, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.53", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All cars are vehicles, some vehicles have four wheels, therefore some cars have four wheels. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let A be the set of cars, B be the set of vehicles, and"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:39.414944+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 283, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.53", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:39.415016+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 285, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.116", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some shoes are trendy, some shoes are comfortable, therefore some trendy shoes are comfortable. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let A be the set of trendy shoes, B be the set of comfortable shoes"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:40.192707+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 286, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.116", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:40.192784+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 288, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.146", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some apples are tart, some apples are red, therefore some tart apples are red. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let A be the set of apples, T be the set of tart things,"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:40.236240+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 289, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.146", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:40.236319+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 291, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.106", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some shirts are striped, some shirts are long-sleeved, therefore some striped shirts are long-sleeved. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let S be the set of shirts, A be the set of striped shirts,"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:40.343177+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 292, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.106", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:40.343246+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 294, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.147", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some birds are singing, some birds are small, therefore some singing birds are small. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let A be the set of singing birds, B be the set of small birds"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:40.921116+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 295, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.147", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:40.921179+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 297, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.123", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some pens are blue, some pens are black, therefore some blue pens are black. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["NO"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:41.320534+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 298, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.123", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "NO", "picked": ["NO"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:41.320654+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 300, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.55", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All horses are animals, some animals have manes, therefore some horses have manes. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let H be the set of horses, A be the set of animals, and"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:41.585572+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 301, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.55", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:41.585703+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 303, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.156", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some phones are advanced, some phones are slim, therefore some advanced phones are slim. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let A be the set of advanced phones, S be the set of slim phones"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:41.845119+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 304, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.156", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:41.845180+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 306, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.153", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some rocks are large, some rocks are gray, therefore some large rocks are gray. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let A be the set of large rocks, B be the set of gray rocks"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:41.902622+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 307, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.153", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:41.902694+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 309, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.160", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some shoes are stylish, some shoes are comfortable, therefore some stylish shoes are comfortable. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let A be the set of stylish shoes, B be the set of comfortable shoes"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:42.091711+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 310, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.160", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:42.091776+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 312, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.65", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All birds are animals, some animals can fly, therefore some birds can fly. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let B be the set of birds, A be the set of animals, and"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:42.135753+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 313, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.65", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:42.135829+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 315, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.50", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All cats are mammals, some mammals are fast, therefore some cats are fast. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let A be the set of cats, B be the set of mammals, and"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:42.923693+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 316, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.50", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:42.923791+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 318, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.139", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some laptops are slim, some laptops are powerful, therefore some slim laptops are powerful. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let A be the set of slim laptops, B be the set of powerful laptops"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:43.062268+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 319, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.139", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:43.062333+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 321, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.82", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All roses are flowers, some flowers are pink, therefore some roses are pink. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let R be the set of roses, F be the set of flowers, and"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:43.319129+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 322, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.82", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:43.319189+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 324, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.77", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All puppies are dogs, some dogs are loyal, therefore some puppies are loyal. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["NO"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:43.907071+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 325, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.77", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "NO", "picked": ["NO"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:43.916563+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 327, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.151", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some clouds are gray, some clouds are fluffy, therefore some gray clouds are fluffy. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let A be the set of gray clouds, B be the set of fluffy clouds"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:44.390350+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 328, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.151", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:44.390432+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 330, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.72", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All oranges are fruits, some fruits are round, therefore some oranges are round. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let O be the set of oranges, F be the set of fruits, and"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:44.395282+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 331, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.72", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:44.395336+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 333, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.127", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some laptops are lightweight, some laptops are powerful, therefore some lightweight laptops are powerful. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let L be the set of laptops, W be the set of lightweight laptops,"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:44.455399+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 334, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.127", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:44.455481+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 336, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.81", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All pencils are writing utensils, some writing utensils are sharp, therefore some pencils are sharp. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let P be the set of pencils, W be the set of writing utensils"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:45.285068+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 337, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.81", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:45.285176+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 339, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.103", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All cars are vehicles, some vehicles are safe, therefore some cars are safe. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let A be the set of cars, B be the set of vehicles, and"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:45.376059+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 340, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.103", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:45.376152+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 342, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.105", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some chairs are modern, some chairs are comfortable, therefore some modern chairs are comfortable. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let A = modern chairs, B = comfortable chairs, and C = chairs.\n\n"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:45.494225+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 343, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.105", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:45.494282+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 345, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.136", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some cars are fast, some cars are sporty, therefore some fast cars are sporty. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let A represent the set of fast cars, B represent the set of sporty"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:45.855522+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 346, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.136", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:45.855585+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 348, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.61", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All cars are vehicles, some vehicles are fast, therefore some cars are fast. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let A be the set of cars, B be the set of vehicles, and"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:46.090826+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 349, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.61", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:46.090947+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 351, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.66", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All lions are cats, some cats are fierce, therefore some lions are fierce. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let L be the set of lions, C be the set of cats, and"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:46.746955+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 352, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.66", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:46.747033+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 354, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.102", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All mountains are landforms, some landforms are high, therefore some mountains are high. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let M be the set of mountains, L be the set of landforms,"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:47.061425+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 355, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.102", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:47.061486+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 357, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.98", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All tigers are cats, some cats are dangerous, therefore some tigers are dangerous. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let T represent the set of tigers, C represent the set of cats,"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:47.487574+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 358, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.98", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:47.487713+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 360, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.107", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some lamps are bright, some lamps are stylish, therefore some bright lamps are stylish. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let L be the set of lamps, B be the set of bright objects,"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:48.156772+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 361, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.107", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:48.156901+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 363, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.39", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some tablets are portable, some tablets are advanced, therefore some portable tablets are advanced. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let A be the set of tablets that are portable, B be the set of"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:48.372964+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 364, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.39", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:48.373085+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 366, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.4", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All oaks are trees, some trees are tall, therefore some oaks are tall. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let A represent the set of oaks, B represent the set of trees,"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:48.569881+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 367, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.4", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:48.570022+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 369, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.43", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All lions are cats, some cats are loud, therefore some lions are loud. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let L be the set of lions, C be the set of cats, and"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:48.718352+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 370, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.43", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:48.718436+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 372, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.67", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All pencils are writing utensils, some writing utensils are long, therefore some pencils are long. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let P be the set of pencils, W be the set of writing utensils"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:49.049047+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 373, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.67", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:49.049198+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 375, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.122", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some phones are smart, some phones are advanced, therefore some smart phones are advanced. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let A be the set of smart phones, B be the set of advanced phones"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:49.616547+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 376, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.122", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:49.616702+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 378, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.110", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some trees are tall, some trees are old, therefore some tall trees are old. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let T be the set of tall trees, O be the set of old trees"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:51.049253+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 379, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.110", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:51.049320+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 381, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.60", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All mountains are landforms, some landforms are rocky, therefore some mountains are rocky. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let M be the set of mountains, L be the set of landforms,"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:51.050932+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 382, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.60", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:51.050990+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 384, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.5", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All lizards are reptiles, some reptiles lay eggs, therefore some snakes lay eggs. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let L = set of lizards, R = set of reptiles, E"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:51.051451+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 385, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.5", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:51.051495+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 387, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.74", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All mountains are landforms, some landforms are snowy, therefore some mountains are snowy. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let M be the set of mountains, L be the set of landforms,"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:51.052183+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 388, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.74", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:51.052256+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 390, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.23", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some houses are small, some houses are yellow, therefore some small houses are yellow. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let A be the set of small houses, B be the set of yellow houses"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:51.206801+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 391, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.23", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:51.206925+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 393, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.36", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some birds are small, some birds are colorful, therefore some small birds are colorful. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let A be the set of small birds, B be the set of colorful birds"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:51.904307+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 394, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.36", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:51.904424+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 396, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.26", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some people are rich, some people are happy, therefore some people are rich and happy. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let A be the set of rich people, B be the set of happy people"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:53.406197+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 397, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.26", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:53.406290+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 399, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.11", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All cats are mammals, some mammals are carnivores, therefore some cats are carnivores. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let A represent cats, B represent mammals, and C represent carnivores.\n\nThe"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:53.406781+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 400, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.11", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:53.406865+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 402, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.80", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All lions are cats, some cats are solitary, therefore some lions are solitary. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let L be the set of lions, C be the set of cats, and"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:53.569852+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 403, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.80", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:53.570000+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 405, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.1", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All chocolate cakes are cakes, some cakes are sweet, therefore some chocolate cakes are sweet. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let A be the set of chocolate cakes, B be the set of cakes,"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:53.714749+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 406, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.1", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:53.714826+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 408, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.114", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some apples are red, some apples are crunchy, therefore some red apples are crunchy. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let A be the set of apples, R be the set of red things,"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:53.719718+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 409, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.114", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:53.719800+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 411, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.32", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some books are old, some books are new, therefore some old books are new. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let A be the set of old books, B be the set of new books"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:54.166274+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 412, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.32", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:54.166391+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 414, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.17", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All chickens are birds, some birds are omnivores, therefore some chickens are omnivores. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let A represent the set of chickens, B represent the set of birds, and"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:54.438661+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 415, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.17", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:54.438810+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 417, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.96", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All roses are flowers, some flowers have thorns, therefore some roses have thorns. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let R be the set of roses, F be the set of flowers, and"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:54.554306+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 418, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.96", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:54.554546+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 420, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.111", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some books are hardcover, some books are educational, therefore some hardcover books are educational. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let A be the set of hardcover books, B be the set of educational"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:55.888101+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 421, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.111", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:55.888273+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 423, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.162", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some strawberries are red, some strawberries are sweet, therefore some red strawberries are sweet. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let A be the set of red strawberries, B be the set of sweet strawberries"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:56.002740+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 424, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.162", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:56.002865+00:00"}
+{"final_report": {"accuracy": 0.08484848484848485, "f1_score": 0.07878787878787878}}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 426, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.62", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All apples are fruits, some fruits are crunchy, therefore some apples are crunchy. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let A be the set of apples, F be the set of fruits, and"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:56.374074+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 427, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.62", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:56.374250+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 429, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.154", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some cats are meowing, some cats are fluffy, therefore some meowing cats are fluffy. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let A = cats that are meowing\nLet B = cats that are fluffy"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:56.476979+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 430, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.154", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:56.477088+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 432, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.0", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All roses are flowers, some flowers fade quickly, therefore some roses fade quickly. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let R be the set of roses, F be the set of flowers, and"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:56.523235+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 433, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.0", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:56.523300+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 435, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.41", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some oranges are juicy, some oranges are sweet, therefore some juicy oranges are sweet. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let A be the set of oranges, B be the set of juicy things,"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:56.594195+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 436, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.41", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:56.594258+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 438, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.155", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some lakes are deep, some lakes are blue, therefore some deep lakes are blue. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let L be the set of lakes, D be the set of deep lakes,"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:57.193770+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 439, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.155", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:57.193961+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 441, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.87", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All kittens are cats, some cats are obedient, therefore some kittens are obedient. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["NO"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:58.011782+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 442, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.87", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "NO", "picked": ["NO"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:58.011880+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 444, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.34", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some dogs are small, some dogs are loyal, therefore some small dogs are loyal. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let A be the set of small dogs, B be the set of loyal dogs"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:58.047959+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 445, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.34", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:58.048038+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 447, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.86", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All oranges are fruits, some fruits are orange, therefore some oranges are orange. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let O represent the set of oranges and F represent the set of fruits. The"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:58.261259+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 448, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.86", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:58.261356+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 450, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.164", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some chairs are comfortable, some chairs are wooden, therefore some comfortable chairs are wooden. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let A be the set of comfortable chairs, B be the set of wooden chairs"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:59.552057+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 451, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.164", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:59.552184+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 453, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.85", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All pens are writing utensils, some writing utensils are thin, therefore some pens are thin. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let P be the set of pens, W be the set of writing utensils"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:59.554565+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 454, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.85", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:59.554658+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 456, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.40", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some chairs are comfortable, some chairs are stylish, therefore some comfortable chairs are stylish. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let A be the set of comfortable chairs, B be the set of stylish chairs"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:59.718730+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 457, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.40", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:59.718859+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 459, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.137", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some houses are small, some houses are cozy, therefore some small houses are cozy. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let A be the set of small houses, B be the set of cozy houses"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:59.817370+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 460, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.137", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:59.817573+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 462, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.97", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All horses are animals, some animals are strong, therefore some horses are strong. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["NO"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:59.958688+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 463, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.97", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "NO", "picked": ["NO"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:33:59.958787+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 465, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.143", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some pens are black, some pens are blue, therefore some black pens are blue. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let P be the set of pens, B be the set of black objects,"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:34:00.778229+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 466, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.143", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:34:00.778383+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 468, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.27", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some apples are red, some apples are sweet, therefore some apples are red and sweet. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let A be the set of apples, R be the set of red things,"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:34:00.864967+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 469, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.27", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:34:00.865105+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 471, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.9", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All bananas are fruits, some fruits rot quickly, therefore some bananas rot quickly. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let A be the set of bananas, B be the set of fruits, and"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:34:01.903070+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 472, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.9", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:34:01.903297+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 474, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.68", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All roses are flowers, some flowers are beautiful, therefore some roses are beautiful. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let R be the set of roses, F be the set of flowers, and"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:34:02.310865+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 475, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.68", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:34:02.311048+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 477, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.22", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some apples are green, some apples are sour, therefore some green apples are sour. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let A be the set of apples, G be the set of green things,"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:34:02.311678+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 478, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.22", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:34:02.311781+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 480, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.163", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some apples are crunchy, some apples are round, therefore some crunchy apples are round. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let A be the set of apples, C be the set of crunchy things,"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:34:02.560960+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 481, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.163", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:34:02.561080+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 483, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.104", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some apples are round, some apples are tart, therefore some round apples are tart. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let A be the set of apples, R be the set of round objects,"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:34:02.655242+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 484, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.104", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:34:02.655367+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 486, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.13", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All eagles are birds, some birds are predators, therefore some eagles are predators. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let E represent the set of eagles, B represent the set of birds,"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:34:03.029772+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 487, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.13", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:34:03.029896+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 489, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.125", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some chairs are wooden, some chairs are comfortable, therefore some wooden chairs are comfortable. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let A be the set of wooden chairs, B be the set of comfortable chairs"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:34:17.031404+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 490, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.125", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:34:17.031534+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 492, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.120", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some houses are big, some houses are modern, therefore some big houses are modern. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["Let A be the set of big houses, B be the set of modern houses"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:34:20.687174+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503013312CTGREWXN", "event_id": 493, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.120", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:34:20.687260+00:00"}
diff --git a/evals/logic/logic-turbo.jsonl b/evals/logic/logic-turbo.jsonl
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d1acabde2d9b537c32430c6eb0c27b4ee6f98365
--- /dev/null
+++ b/evals/logic/logic-turbo.jsonl
@@ -0,0 +1,332 @@
+{"spec": {"completion_fns": ["gpt-3.5-turbo"], "eval_name": "logic-statements.dev.v0", "base_eval": "logic-statements", "split": "dev", "run_config": {"completion_fns": ["gpt-3.5-turbo"], "eval_spec": {"cls": "evals.elsuite.basic.fuzzy_match:FuzzyMatch", "args": {"samples_jsonl": "logic-statements/logic-statements.jsonl"}, "key": "logic-statements.dev.v0", "group": "logic-statements"}, "seed": 20220722, "max_samples": null, "command": "/Users/acabrera/dev-research/22-zeno/openai-eval/evals/evals/cli/oaieval.py gpt-3.5-turbo logic-statements", "initial_settings": {"visible": true}}, "created_by": "", "run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:41.504294"}}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 0, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.38", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some cars are electric, some cars are fuel-efficient, therefore some electric cars are fuel-efficient. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet set A represent the set of cars that are electric, and"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:42.911763+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 1, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.38", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:42.912157+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 3, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.145", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some horses are brown, some horses are strong, therefore some brown horses are strong. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet H be the set of all horses, B be the set"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:42.912529+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 4, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.145", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:42.912577+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 6, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.157", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some computers are powerful, some computers are stylish, therefore some powerful computers are stylish. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet set A be the set of all computers, set B be"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:42.914670+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 7, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.157", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:42.914741+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 9, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.59", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All kittens are cats, some cats are playful, therefore some kittens are playful. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet K be the set of all kittens, C be the set"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:42.915361+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 10, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.59", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:42.915430+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 12, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.94", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All lions are cats, some cats are agile, therefore some lions are agile. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet set A represent all lions and set B represent all cats."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:42.919011+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 13, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.94", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:42.919077+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 15, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.90", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All apples are fruits, some fruits are firm, therefore some apples are firm. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet A be the set of all apples and F be the set"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:42.919667+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 16, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.90", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:42.919716+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 18, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.118", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some mountains are tall, some mountains are snow-capped, therefore some tall mountains are snow-capped. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet set A be the set of all mountains, set B be"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:43.030606+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 19, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.118", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:43.030709+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 21, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.3", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All salmon are fish, some fish are pink, therefore some salmon are pink. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet S be the set of all salmon and F be the set"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:43.034636+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 22, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.3", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:43.034707+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 24, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.57", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All pens are writing utensils, some writing utensils are black, therefore some pens are black. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet P be the set of all pens, W be the set"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:43.091265+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 25, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.57", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:43.091372+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 27, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.18", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All hurricanes are storms, some storms are destructive, therefore some hurricanes are destructive. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet H be the set of all hurricanes, S be the set"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:43.148492+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 28, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.18", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:43.148594+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 30, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.152", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some shirts are polka-dotted, some shirts are long-sleeved, therefore some polka-dotted shirts are long-sleeved. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:43.656791+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 31, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.152", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:43.656851+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 33, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.14", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All stars are luminous bodies, some luminous bodies are bright, therefore some stars are bright. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet S be the set of all stars, L be the set"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:44.082095+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 34, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.14", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:44.082226+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 36, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.19", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All oranges are citrus fruits, some citrus fruits are sour, therefore some oranges are sour. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet O be the set of all oranges and C be the set"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:44.113670+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 37, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.19", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:44.113744+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 39, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.141", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some oranges are orange, some oranges are juicy, therefore some orange oranges are juicy. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet set A be the set of all oranges, set B be"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:44.147241+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 40, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.141", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:44.147298+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 42, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.25", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some turtles are old, some turtles are young, therefore some old turtles are young. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet O be the set of old turtles and Y be the set"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:44.150518+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 43, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.25", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:44.150587+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 45, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.79", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All birds are animals, some animals are colorful, therefore some birds are colorful. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet A be the set of all birds and B be the set"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:44.159837+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 46, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.79", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:44.159894+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 48, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.128", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some flowers are fragrant, some flowers are bright, therefore some fragrant flowers are bright. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet F be the set of all flowers, and let Fragrant"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:44.160201+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 49, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.128", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:44.160237+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 51, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.126", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some oranges are juicy, some oranges are round, therefore some juicy oranges are round. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet set A represent all oranges, set B represent juicy oranges,"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:44.191270+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 52, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.126", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:44.191332+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 54, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.149", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some books are hardcover, some books are old, therefore some hardcover books are old. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet A be the set of books that are hardcover and B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:44.206289+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 55, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.149", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:44.206375+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 57, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.31", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some rocks are big, some rocks are gray, therefore some big rocks are gray. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet set A be the set of all rocks, set B be"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:44.316975+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 58, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.31", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:44.317096+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 60, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.101", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All kittens are cats, some cats are cuddly, therefore some kittens are cuddly. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet K be the set of all kittens, C be the set"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:44.715103+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 61, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.101", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:44.715235+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 63, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.161", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some houses are big, some houses are yellow, therefore some big houses are yellow. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet A be the set of houses that are big, and B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:45.192446+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 64, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.161", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:45.192526+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 66, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.15", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All alpacas are mammals, some mammals are domesticated, therefore some alpacas are domesticated. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet A be the set of all alpacas, M be"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:45.223018+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 67, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.15", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:45.223131+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 69, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.20", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All rabbits are mammals, some mammals are small, therefore some rabbits are small. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet R be the set of all rabbits, M be the set"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:45.229807+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 70, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.20", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:45.229874+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 72, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.78", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All trees are plants, some plants are green, therefore some trees are green. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet T be the set of all trees and P be the set"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:45.256142+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 73, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.78", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:45.256212+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 75, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.89", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All cars are vehicles, some vehicles are modern, therefore some cars are modern. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet set A represent the set of all cars, set B represent"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:45.291774+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 76, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.89", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:45.291835+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 78, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.37", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some houses are big, some houses are expensive, therefore some big houses are expensive. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet A be the set of houses that are big, and B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:45.371133+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 79, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.37", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:45.371293+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 81, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.119", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some strawberries are ripe, some strawberries are sweet, therefore some ripe strawberries are sweet. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet R be the set of ripe strawberries and S be the set"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:45.379390+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 82, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.119", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:45.379604+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 84, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.93", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All birds are animals, some animals are graceful, therefore some birds are graceful. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet A be the set of all birds and B be the set"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:45.430684+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 85, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.93", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:45.430835+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 87, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.44", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All pencils are writing utensils, some writing utensils are yellow, therefore some pencils are yellow. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet P be the set of all pencils and W be the set"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:45.657548+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 88, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.44", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:45.657639+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 90, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.95", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All pencils are writing utensils, some writing utensils are wooden, therefore some pencils are wooden. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet P be the set of all pencils, W be the set"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:45.824434+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 91, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.95", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:45.824546+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 93, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.56", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All tigers are cats, some cats are striped, therefore some tigers are striped. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet set A represent all tigers and set B represent all cats"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:46.265588+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 94, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.56", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:46.265682+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 96, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.35", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some laptops are cheap, some laptops are powerful, therefore some cheap laptops are powerful. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nWe can represent the set of all laptops as L. Let C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:46.332315+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 97, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.35", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:46.332382+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 99, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.131", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some apples are green, some apples are juicy, therefore some green apples are juicy. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet A be the set of all apples, G be the set"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:46.332777+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 100, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.131", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:46.332836+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 102, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.91", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All puppies are dogs, some dogs are energetic, therefore some puppies are energetic. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet P be the set of all puppies and D be the set"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:46.448665+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 103, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.91", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:46.448766+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 105, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.148", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some cakes are sweet, some cakes are delicious, therefore some sweet cakes are delicious. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet set A be the set of all cakes, set B be"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:46.707292+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 106, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.148", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:46.707395+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 108, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.6", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All flowers are plants, some plants are green, therefore some flowers are green. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet F be the set of all flowers and P be the set"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:46.711092+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 109, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.6", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:46.711148+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 111, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.92", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All trees are plants, some plants have bark, therefore some trees have bark. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet T be the set of all trees and P be the set"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:46.712534+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 112, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.92", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:46.712581+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 114, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.112", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some computers are powerful, some computers are portable, therefore some powerful computers are portable. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet set A represent the set of all computers, set B represent"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:46.716974+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 115, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.112", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:46.717035+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 117, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.132", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some birds are chirping, some birds are colorful, therefore some chirping birds are colorful. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet A be the set of birds that are chirping, and"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:46.729490+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 118, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.132", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:46.729546+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 120, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.52", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All apples are fruits, some fruits are sweet, therefore some apples are sweet. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet A be the set of all apples and F be the set"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:46.918689+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 121, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.52", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:46.918833+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 123, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.117", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some dogs are loyal, some dogs are friendly, therefore some loyal dogs are friendly. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nWe can represent the set of all dogs as D. Let L"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:47.390618+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 124, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.117", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:47.390712+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 126, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.159", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some cars are hybrid, some cars are fuel-efficient, therefore some hybrid cars are fuel-efficient. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet set A represent the set of all cars that are hybrid,"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:47.511801+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 127, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.159", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:47.511900+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 129, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.129", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some clouds are white, some clouds are fluffy, therefore some white clouds are fluffy. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet set A represent all clouds, set B represent white clouds,"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:47.753274+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 130, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.129", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:47.753370+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 132, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.140", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some dogs are loyal, some dogs are playful, therefore some loyal dogs are playful. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nWe can represent the set of all dogs as D. Let L"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:47.795083+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 133, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.140", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:47.795160+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 135, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.71", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All pens are writing utensils, some writing utensils are blue, therefore some pens are blue. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet P be the set of all pens, W be the set"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:47.796325+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 136, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.71", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:47.796386+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 138, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.99", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All pens are writing utensils, some writing utensils are plastic, therefore some pens are plastic. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet P be the set of all pens, W be the set"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:47.801457+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 139, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.99", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:47.801519+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 141, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.142", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some flowers are fragrant, some flowers are small, therefore some fragrant flowers are small. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet F be the set of all flowers, S be the set"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:47.839995+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 142, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.142", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:47.840090+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 144, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.16", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All monkeys are primates, some primates are intelligent, therefore some monkeys are intelligent. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet M be the set of all monkeys and P be the set"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:47.846954+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 145, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.16", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:47.847036+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 147, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.12", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All apples are fruits, some fruits are yellow, therefore some apples are yellow. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet A be the set of all apples and F be the set"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:47.878050+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 148, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.12", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:47.878127+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 150, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.54", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All roses are flowers, some flowers are fragrant, therefore some roses are fragrant. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet R be the set of all roses, F be the set"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:48.146765+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 151, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.54", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:48.146897+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 153, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.138", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some shirts are red, some shirts are long-sleeved, therefore some red shirts are long-sleeved. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:48.852148+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 154, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.138", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:48.852250+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 156, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.8", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All red wine is wine, some wine is fruity, therefore some red wine is fruity. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet R be the set of all red wine, W be the"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:48.853744+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 157, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.8", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:48.853805+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 159, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.113", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some cats are fluffy, some cats are playful, therefore some fluffy cats are playful. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:48.857494+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 160, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.113", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:48.857552+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 162, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.144", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some tables are wooden, some tables are sturdy, therefore some wooden tables are sturdy. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet T be the set of all tables, W be the set"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:48.877465+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 163, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.144", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:48.877527+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 165, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.48", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All birds are animals, some animals are small, therefore some birds are small. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet A be the set of all birds and B be the set"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:48.902397+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 166, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.48", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:48.902458+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 168, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.75", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All cars are vehicles, some vehicles have engines, therefore some cars have engines. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet C be the set of all cars, V be the set"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:48.909475+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 169, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.75", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:48.909529+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 171, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.130", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some rocks are gray, some rocks are smooth, therefore some gray rocks are smooth. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet set A be the set of all rocks, set B be"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:48.933199+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 172, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.130", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:48.933271+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 174, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.28", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some jeans are blue, some jeans are ripped, therefore some jeans are blue and ripped. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nWe can represent the set of all jeans as J. Let B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:49.044781+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 175, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.28", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:49.044916+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 177, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.88", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All mountains are landforms, some landforms are steep, therefore some mountains are steep. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet M be the set of all mountains, L be the set"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:49.053365+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 178, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.88", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:49.053437+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 180, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.115", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some birds are small, some birds are colorful, therefore some small birds are colorful. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet A be the set of all birds, B be the set"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:49.360738+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 181, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.115", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:49.360834+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 183, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.150", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some chairs are modern, some chairs are wooden, therefore some modern chairs are wooden. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:49.497881+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 184, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.150", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:49.498012+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 186, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.63", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All puppies are dogs, some dogs are friendly, therefore some puppies are friendly. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet P be the set of all puppies and D be the set"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:50.047381+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 187, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.63", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:50.047499+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 189, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.69", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All horses are animals, some animals run fast, therefore some horses run fast. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet H be the set of all horses and A be the set"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:50.048117+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 190, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.69", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:50.048186+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 192, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.133", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some cats are purring, some cats are playful, therefore some purring cats are playful. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet A be the set of cats that are purring, and"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:50.054678+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 193, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.133", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:50.054774+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 195, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.7", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All gold is metal, some metals are black, therefore some gold is black. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet set G represent the set of all gold, set M represent"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:50.056014+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 196, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.7", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:50.056242+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 198, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.64", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All trees are plants, some plants are evergreen, therefore some trees are evergreen. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet T be the set of all trees, P be the set"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:50.057666+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 199, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.64", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:50.057720+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 201, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.30", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some grapes are green, some grapes are sour, therefore some green grapes are sour. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet G be the set of all grapes, Gg be the"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:50.069781+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 202, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.30", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:50.069847+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 204, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.29", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some containers are full, some containers are empty, therefore some containers are neither full nor empty. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet's represent the set of all containers as C. \n\nLet"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:50.581189+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 205, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.29", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:50.581303+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 207, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.51", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All airplanes are vehicles, some vehicles are loud, therefore some airplanes are loud. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet A be the set of all airplanes and V be the set"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:50.586243+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 208, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.51", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:50.586314+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 210, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.45", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All apples are fruits, some fruits are red, therefore some apples are red. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet A be the set of all apples and F be the set"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:50.586726+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 211, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.45", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:50.586778+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 213, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.109", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some flowers are fragrant, some flowers are beautiful, therefore some fragrant flowers are beautiful. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet F be the set of all fragrant flowers, B be"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:50.618769+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 214, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.109", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:50.618889+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 216, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.73", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All kittens are cats, some cats are fluffy, therefore some kittens are fluffy. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet K be the set of all kittens, C be the set"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:51.685167+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 217, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.73", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:51.703272+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 219, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.135", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some trees are tall, some trees are green, therefore some tall trees are green. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet T be the set of all trees. Let T1 be"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:51.949116+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 220, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.135", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:51.949275+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 222, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.83", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All horses are animals, some animals have tails, therefore some horses have tails. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet H be the set of all horses and A be the set"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:51.952974+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 223, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.83", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:51.953045+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 225, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.24", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some cars have a sunroof, some cars are fast, therefore some fast cars have a sunroof. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet A be the set of cars with a sunroof, and"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:51.957526+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 226, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.24", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:51.957592+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 228, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.46", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All puppies are dogs, some dogs are cute, therefore some puppies are cute. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet P be the set of all puppies and D be the set"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:51.958921+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 229, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.46", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:51.958976+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 231, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.2", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All dogs are animals, some animals have four legs, therefore some dogs have four legs. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet A be the set of all dogs and B be the set"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:51.959484+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 232, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.2", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:51.959533+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 234, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.158", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some dogs are friendly, some dogs are small, therefore some friendly dogs are small. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nWe can represent the set of all dogs as D. Let F"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:52.654081+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 235, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.158", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:52.654163+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 237, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.58", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All oranges are fruits, some fruits are juicy, therefore some oranges are juicy. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet O be the set of all oranges and F be the set"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:52.697841+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 238, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.58", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:52.697932+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 240, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.49", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All mountains are landforms, some landforms are tall, therefore some mountains are tall. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet M be the set of all mountains, L be the set"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:52.710225+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 241, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.49", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:52.710314+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 243, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.108", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some cars are hybrid, some cars are fuel-efficient, therefore some hybrid cars are fuel-efficient. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet set A represent the set of all cars that are hybrid,"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:52.717415+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 244, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.108", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:52.717527+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 246, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.33", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some cats are playful, some cats are furry, therefore some playful cats are furry. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nWe can represent the set of all cats as C. Let P"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:53.000121+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 247, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.33", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:53.000265+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 249, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.42", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All horses are animals, some animals have hooves, therefore some horses have hooves. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet H be the set of horses and A be the set of"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:53.034213+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 250, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.42", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:53.034299+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 252, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.121", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some bananas are yellow, some bananas are ripe, therefore some yellow bananas are ripe. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet set A represent all bananas, set B represent all yellow bananas"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:53.040700+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 253, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.121", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:53.040763+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 255, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.70", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All tigers are cats, some cats are big, therefore some tigers are big. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet set A represent all tigers and set B represent all cats"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:53.058650+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 256, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.70", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:53.058705+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 258, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.84", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All tigers are cats, some cats are wild, therefore some tigers are wild. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet set A represent tigers, set B represent cats, and"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:53.062619+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 259, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.84", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:53.062675+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 261, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.125", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some chairs are wooden, some chairs are comfortable, therefore some wooden chairs are comfortable. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:53.075278+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 262, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.125", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:53.075333+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 264, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.21", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some horses are black, some horses are warm-blooded, therefore some black horses are warm-blooded. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet set A be the set of horses that are black, and"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:53.176085+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 265, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.21", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:53.176179+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 267, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.106", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some shirts are striped, some shirts are long-sleeved, therefore some striped shirts are long-sleeved. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:53.527764+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 268, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.106", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:53.527858+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 270, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.134", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some cookies are sweet, some cookies are crunchy, therefore some sweet cookies are crunchy. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet set A represent all cookies that are sweet, and set B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:53.755406+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 271, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.134", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:53.755704+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 273, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.10", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All planets are celestial bodies, some celestial bodies are stars, therefore some planets are stars. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["NO. \n\nExplanation: \n\nLet's represent the sets using letters: \n\n-"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:53.764462+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 274, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.10", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "NO", "picked": ["NO. \n\nExplanation: \n\nLet's represent the sets using letters: \n\n-"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:53.764597+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 276, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.116", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some shoes are trendy, some shoes are comfortable, therefore some trendy shoes are comfortable. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:53.792548+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 277, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.116", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:53.792609+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 279, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.124", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some cars are electric, some cars are fast, therefore some electric cars are fast. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet set A be the set of cars that are electric, and"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:54.078525+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 280, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.124", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:54.078618+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 282, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.47", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All trees are plants, some plants have leaves, therefore some trees have leaves. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet T be the set of all trees and P be the set"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:54.117586+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 283, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.47", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:54.117757+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 285, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.53", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All cars are vehicles, some vehicles have four wheels, therefore some cars have four wheels. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet set A represent the set of all cars and set B represent"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:54.146149+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 286, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.53", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:54.146279+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 288, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.120", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some houses are big, some houses are modern, therefore some big houses are modern. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet A be the set of houses that are big, and B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:54.179082+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 289, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.120", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:54.179155+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 291, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.146", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some apples are tart, some apples are red, therefore some tart apples are red. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet A be the set of all apples, T be the set"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:54.211927+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 292, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.146", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:54.211982+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 294, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.100", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All oranges are fruits, some fruits are aromatic, therefore some oranges are aromatic. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet O be the set of all oranges and F be the set"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:54.264748+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 295, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.100", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:54.264809+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 297, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.123", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some pens are blue, some pens are black, therefore some blue pens are black. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["NO."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:54.628587+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 298, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.123", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "NO", "picked": ["NO."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:54.628680+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 300, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.76", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All apples are fruits, some fruits are tart, therefore some apples are tart. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet A be the set of all apples and F be the set"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:54.653930+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 301, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.76", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:54.654026+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 303, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.160", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some shoes are stylish, some shoes are comfortable, therefore some stylish shoes are comfortable. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:54.711517+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 304, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.160", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:54.711644+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 306, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.147", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some birds are singing, some birds are small, therefore some singing birds are small. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet A be the set of birds that are singing, and B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:54.862916+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 307, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.147", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:54.863018+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 309, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.156", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some phones are advanced, some phones are slim, therefore some advanced phones are slim. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["The statement is true. \n\nLet A be the set of phones that are advanced"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:55.097570+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 310, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.156", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:55.097673+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 312, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.153", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some rocks are large, some rocks are gray, therefore some large rocks are gray. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet set A be the set of all rocks, set B be"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:55.166837+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 313, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.153", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:55.166958+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 315, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.55", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All horses are animals, some animals have manes, therefore some horses have manes. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet H be the set of horses and A be the set of"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:55.234440+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 316, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.55", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:55.234550+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 318, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.82", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All roses are flowers, some flowers are pink, therefore some roses are pink. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet R be the set of all roses, F be the set"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:55.250739+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 319, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.82", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:55.250810+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 321, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.65", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All birds are animals, some animals can fly, therefore some birds can fly. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet A be the set of all birds and B be the set"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:55.261691+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 322, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.65", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:55.261758+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 324, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.50", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All cats are mammals, some mammals are fast, therefore some cats are fast. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet set A represent all cats and set B represent all mammals."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:55.482447+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 325, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.50", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:55.482513+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 327, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.139", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some laptops are slim, some laptops are powerful, therefore some slim laptops are powerful. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet set A be the set of all laptops, set B be"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:55.793471+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 328, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.139", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:55.793526+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 330, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.103", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All cars are vehicles, some vehicles are safe, therefore some cars are safe. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet C be the set of all cars, V be the set"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:55.803867+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 331, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.103", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:55.803918+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 333, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.151", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some clouds are gray, some clouds are fluffy, therefore some gray clouds are fluffy. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet set A represent the set of all clouds, set B represent"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:55.855231+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 334, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.151", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:55.855285+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 336, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.105", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some chairs are modern, some chairs are comfortable, therefore some modern chairs are comfortable. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:56.144597+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 337, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.105", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:56.144664+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 339, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.127", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some laptops are lightweight, some laptops are powerful, therefore some lightweight laptops are powerful. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet set A be the set of all laptops, set B be"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:56.168393+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 340, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.127", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:56.168470+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 342, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.72", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All oranges are fruits, some fruits are round, therefore some oranges are round. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet O be the set of all oranges and F be the set"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:56.174907+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 343, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.72", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:56.174967+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 345, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.136", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some cars are fast, some cars are sporty, therefore some fast cars are sporty. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet set A be the set of cars that are fast, and"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:56.377476+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 346, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.136", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:56.377544+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 348, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.81", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All pencils are writing utensils, some writing utensils are sharp, therefore some pencils are sharp. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet P be the set of all pencils, W be the set"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:56.389362+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 349, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.81", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:56.389429+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 351, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.77", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All puppies are dogs, some dogs are loyal, therefore some puppies are loyal. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet P be the set of all puppies and D be the set"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:56.536188+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 352, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.77", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:56.536275+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 354, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.61", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All cars are vehicles, some vehicles are fast, therefore some cars are fast. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet set A represent the set of all cars, and set B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:56.668080+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 355, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.61", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:56.668305+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 357, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.102", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All mountains are landforms, some landforms are high, therefore some mountains are high. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet M be the set of all mountains, L be the set"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:56.830235+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 358, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.102", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:56.830332+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 360, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.43", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All lions are cats, some cats are loud, therefore some lions are loud. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet set A represent all lions and set B represent all cats."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:56.950676+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 361, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.43", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:56.950792+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 363, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.66", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All lions are cats, some cats are fierce, therefore some lions are fierce. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet set A represent all lions and set B represent all cats."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:57.195840+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 364, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.66", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:57.195909+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 366, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.39", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some tablets are portable, some tablets are advanced, therefore some portable tablets are advanced. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet T be the set of all tablets, P be the set"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:57.212196+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 367, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.39", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:57.212281+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 369, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.98", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All tigers are cats, some cats are dangerous, therefore some tigers are dangerous. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet set A represent all tigers and set B represent all cats"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:57.271629+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 370, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.98", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:57.271694+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 372, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.4", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All oaks are trees, some trees are tall, therefore some oaks are tall. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet set A represent the set of all oaks and set B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:57.274071+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 373, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.4", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:57.274130+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 375, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.107", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some lamps are bright, some lamps are stylish, therefore some bright lamps are stylish. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet set A be the set of all lamps, set B be"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:57.583666+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 376, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.107", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:57.583805+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 378, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.60", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All mountains are landforms, some landforms are rocky, therefore some mountains are rocky. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet M be the set of all mountains, L be the set"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:57.603907+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 379, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.60", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:57.603977+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 381, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.67", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All pencils are writing utensils, some writing utensils are long, therefore some pencils are long. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet P be the set of all pencils, W be the set"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:57.715190+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 382, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.67", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:57.715325+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 384, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.122", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some phones are smart, some phones are advanced, therefore some smart phones are advanced. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet's represent the set of all phones as P. Then,"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:57.752515+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 385, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.122", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:57.752579+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 387, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.32", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some books are old, some books are new, therefore some old books are new. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["NO."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:57.844556+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 388, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.32", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "NO", "picked": ["NO."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:57.844651+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 390, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.110", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some trees are tall, some trees are old, therefore some tall trees are old. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet T be the set of all trees. Let the subset T"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:57.887445+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 391, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.110", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:57.887517+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 393, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.74", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All mountains are landforms, some landforms are snowy, therefore some mountains are snowy. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet M be the set of all mountains, L be the set"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:58.259348+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 394, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.74", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:58.259428+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 396, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.5", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All lizards are reptiles, some reptiles lay eggs, therefore some snakes lay eggs. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet L be the set of all lizards, R be the"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:58.277248+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 397, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.5", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:58.277327+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 399, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.23", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some houses are small, some houses are yellow, therefore some small houses are yellow. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet S be the set of small houses and Y be the set"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:58.334873+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 400, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.23", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:58.334933+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 402, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.114", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some apples are red, some apples are crunchy, therefore some red apples are crunchy. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:58.397819+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 403, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.114", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:58.397915+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 405, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.36", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some birds are small, some birds are colorful, therefore some small birds are colorful. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet A be the set of all birds, B be the set"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:58.452518+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 406, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.36", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:58.452619+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 408, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.80", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All lions are cats, some cats are solitary, therefore some lions are solitary. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet set A represent all lions and set B represent all cats."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:58.962196+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 409, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.80", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:58.962274+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 411, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.26", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some people are rich, some people are happy, therefore some people are rich and happy. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nWe can represent the set of people who are rich as R,"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:58.963420+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 412, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.26", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:58.963481+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 414, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.17", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All chickens are birds, some birds are omnivores, therefore some chickens are omnivores. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet set A represent all chickens and set B represent all birds."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:58.965365+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 415, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.17", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:58.965428+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 417, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.11", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All cats are mammals, some mammals are carnivores, therefore some cats are carnivores. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet set A represent all cats, set B represent all mammals,"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:58.968121+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 418, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.11", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:58.968186+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 420, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.1", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All chocolate cakes are cakes, some cakes are sweet, therefore some chocolate cakes are sweet. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet set A represent all chocolate cakes, and set B represent all"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:58.980245+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 421, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.1", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:58.980380+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 423, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.111", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some books are hardcover, some books are educational, therefore some hardcover books are educational. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:58.990029+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 424, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.111", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:58.990095+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 426, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.162", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some strawberries are red, some strawberries are sweet, therefore some red strawberries are sweet. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet S be the set of all strawberries. Let R be the"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:59.487751+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 427, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.162", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:59.487819+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 429, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.0", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All roses are flowers, some flowers fade quickly, therefore some roses fade quickly. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet R be the set of all roses and F be the set"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:59.489468+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 430, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.0", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:59.489878+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 432, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.96", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All roses are flowers, some flowers have thorns, therefore some roses have thorns. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet R be the set of all roses and F be the set"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:59.493065+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 433, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.96", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:59.493131+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 435, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.41", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some oranges are juicy, some oranges are sweet, therefore some juicy oranges are sweet. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet's represent the set of all oranges as O. Then,"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:59.514787+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 436, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.41", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:59.514855+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 438, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.40", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some chairs are comfortable, some chairs are stylish, therefore some comfortable chairs are stylish. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:59.817495+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 439, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.40", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:59.817614+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 441, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.154", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some cats are meowing, some cats are fluffy, therefore some meowing cats are fluffy. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet set A represent all cats, set B represent cats that are"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:59.993399+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 442, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.154", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:26:59.993498+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 444, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.34", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some dogs are small, some dogs are loyal, therefore some small dogs are loyal. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet set A represent the set of all dogs, set B represent"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:27:00.049580+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 445, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.34", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:27:00.049727+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 447, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.62", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All apples are fruits, some fruits are crunchy, therefore some apples are crunchy. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet A be the set of all apples and F be the set"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:27:00.052305+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 448, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.62", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:27:00.052416+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 450, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.86", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All oranges are fruits, some fruits are orange, therefore some oranges are orange. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet O be the set of all oranges and F be the set"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:27:00.062634+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 451, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.86", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:27:00.062692+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 453, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.155", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some lakes are deep, some lakes are blue, therefore some deep lakes are blue. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet set A be the set of lakes that are deep, and"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:27:00.102995+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 454, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.155", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:27:00.103056+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 456, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.164", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some chairs are comfortable, some chairs are wooden, therefore some comfortable chairs are wooden. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:27:00.343542+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 457, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.164", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:27:00.343621+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 459, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.87", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All kittens are cats, some cats are obedient, therefore some kittens are obedient. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet K be the set of all kittens, C be the set"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:27:00.551490+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 460, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.87", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:27:00.551558+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 462, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.143", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some pens are black, some pens are blue, therefore some black pens are blue. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet A be the set of all pens, B be the set"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:27:00.590770+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 463, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.143", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:27:00.590836+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 465, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.85", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All pens are writing utensils, some writing utensils are thin, therefore some pens are thin. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet P be the set of all pens, W be the set"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:27:00.730435+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 466, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.85", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:27:00.730577+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 468, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.137", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some houses are small, some houses are cozy, therefore some small houses are cozy. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet S be the set of small houses and C be the set"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:27:00.943481+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 469, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.137", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:27:00.943633+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 471, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.97", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All horses are animals, some animals are strong, therefore some horses are strong. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet H be the set of horses, A be the set of"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:27:01.149043+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 472, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.97", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:27:01.149107+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 474, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.104", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some apples are round, some apples are tart, therefore some round apples are tart. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet A be the set of all apples, R be the set"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:27:01.388901+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 475, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.104", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:27:01.389030+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 477, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.27", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some apples are red, some apples are sweet, therefore some apples are red and sweet. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nWe can represent the set of all apples as A. Let R"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:27:01.403365+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 478, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.27", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:27:01.403433+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 480, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.22", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some apples are green, some apples are sour, therefore some green apples are sour. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet A be the set of all apples, G be the set"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:27:01.403993+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 481, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.22", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:27:01.404058+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 483, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.163", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? Some apples are crunchy, some apples are round, therefore some crunchy apples are round. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet A be the set of all apples, C be the set"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:27:01.411156+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 484, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.163", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:27:01.411216+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 486, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.9", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All bananas are fruits, some fruits rot quickly, therefore some bananas rot quickly. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet B be the set of all bananas and F be the set"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:27:01.444429+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 487, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.9", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:27:01.444553+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 489, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.68", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All roses are flowers, some flowers are beautiful, therefore some roses are beautiful. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet R be the set of all roses, F be the set"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:27:01.780103+00:00"}
+{"final_report": {"accuracy": 0.01818181818181818, "f1_score": 0.01818181818181818}}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 490, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.13", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "Ignore domain knowledge and interpret the following assertion using set theory."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Is the following statement true? All eagles are birds, some birds are predators, therefore some eagles are predators. Format your final answer as either YES or NO."}], "sampled": ["YES. \n\nLet E be the set of all eagles, B be the"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:27:01.802718+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 491, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.68", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:27:01.802819+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230503012641CK4T5V4C", "event_id": 492, "sample_id": "logic-statements.dev.13", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "NO", "picked": []}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-03 01:27:01.802908+00:00"}
diff --git a/evals/medmcqa/med-3.5-turbo.jsonl b/evals/medmcqa/med-3.5-turbo.jsonl
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..64174f1bc1f78c3026a5fda1e357ac25540123e9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/evals/medmcqa/med-3.5-turbo.jsonl
@@ -0,0 +1,602 @@
+{"spec": {"completion_fns": ["gpt-3.5-turbo"], "eval_name": "medmcqa.dev.v0", "base_eval": "medmcqa", "split": "dev", "run_config": {"completion_fns": ["gpt-3.5-turbo"], "eval_spec": {"cls": "evals.elsuite.basic.match:Match", "args": {"samples_jsonl": "medmcqa/samples.jsonl"}, "key": "medmcqa.dev.v0", "group": "medmcqa"}, "seed": 20220722, "max_samples": null, "command": "/Users/acabrera/dev-research/22-zeno/openai-eval/evals/evals/cli/oaieval.py gpt-3.5-turbo medmcqa", "initial_settings": {"visible": true}}, "created_by": "", "run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:14.264687"}}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 0, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.252", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Microbiology\n\nSpore forming anaerobic gram positive bacilli ?\n\na) Bacillus Anthracis\nb) Clostridia\nc) Corynebacterium\nd) Peptostreptococcus"}], "sampled": ["b) Clostridia"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:15.080972+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 1, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.252", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "b) Clostridia", "picked": "b) Clostridia", "sampled": "b) Clostridia", "options": ["b) Clostridia"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:15.081060+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 2, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.286", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Radiology\n\nAll the teeth in patient’s mouth are similarly affected as shown in the radiograph. What is the most likely anomaly?\n\na) Type 1 dentinal dysplasia\nb) Type 2 dentinal dysplasia\nc) Taurodontism\nd) Amelogenesis imperfecta"}], "sampled": ["c) Taurodontism"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:15.105069+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 3, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.286", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "b) Type 2 dentinal dysplasia", "picked": null, "sampled": "c) Taurodontism", "options": ["b) Type 2 dentinal dysplasia"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:15.105111+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 4, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.231", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Biochemistry\n\nArrange the following 4 enzymes of gluconeogenesis in sequence: A. Pyruvate carboxylase B. Glucose - 6 - phosphatase C. Phosphoenol pyruvate carboxy kinase D. Fructose 1,6 Bisphosphatase\n\na) D-C-A-B\nb) A-C-D-B\nc) B-A-D-C\nd) C-D-B-A"}], "sampled": ["d) C-D-B-A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:15.139641+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 5, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.231", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "b) A-C-D-B", "picked": null, "sampled": "d) C-D-B-A", "options": ["b) A-C-D-B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:15.139679+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 6, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.127", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Microbiology\n\nSeal finger and whale finger are associated with -\n\na) Listeria\nb) Erysipelothrix\nc) Corynebacterium\nd) Treponema"}], "sampled": ["b) Erysipelothrix"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:15.151249+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 7, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.127", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "b) Erysipelothrix", "picked": "b) Erysipelothrix", "sampled": "b) Erysipelothrix", "options": ["b) Erysipelothrix"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:15.151284+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 8, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.180", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Forensic Medicine\n\nUnder transplantation of humans organs act, the punishment for the doctor involved is\n\na) < 1 year\nb) < 2 years\nc) 2-5 years\nd) > 5 years"}], "sampled": ["d) > 5 years"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:15.168363+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 9, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.180", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "c) 2-5 years", "picked": null, "sampled": "d) > 5 years", "options": ["c) 2-5 years"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:15.168395+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 10, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.169", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Forensic Medicine\n\nA 2-year-old child had burns on buttocks, both legs, face, neck and singeing of hair. Total surface area burnt: JIPMER 14\n\na) 27%\nb) 37%\nc) 45%\nd) 55%"}], "sampled": ["b) 37%"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:15.191714+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 11, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.169", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "b) 37%", "picked": "b) 37%", "sampled": "b) 37%", "options": ["b) 37%"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:15.191742+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 12, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.87", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Forensic Medicine\n\nLast organ to putrefy in females is?\n\na) Liver\nb) Uterus\nc) Brain\nd) Breast"}], "sampled": ["b) Uterus"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:15.360141+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 13, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.87", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "b) Uterus", "picked": "b) Uterus", "sampled": "b) Uterus", "options": ["b) Uterus"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:15.360218+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 14, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.9", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Psychiatry\n\nHypomimia is ?\n\na) Decreased ability to copy\nb) Decreased execution\nc) Deficit of expression by gesture\nd) Deficit of fluent speech"}], "sampled": ["c) Deficit of expression by gesture"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:15.446546+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 15, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.9", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "c) Deficit of expression by gesture", "picked": "c) Deficit of expression by gesture", "sampled": "c) Deficit of expression by gesture", "options": ["c) Deficit of expression by gesture"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:15.446591+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 16, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.63", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Anaesthesia\n\nDrug causing malignant hyperthermia:(Asked twice in the exam)\n\na) Cisatracurium\nb) Suxamethonium\nc) Propofol\nd) Thiopentone"}], "sampled": ["b) Suxamethonium"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:15.466244+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 17, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.63", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "b) Suxamethonium", "picked": "b) Suxamethonium", "sampled": "b) Suxamethonium", "options": ["b) Suxamethonium"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:15.466300+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 18, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.198", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Pathology\n\nGene involved in Cowden syndrome is\n\na) P53\nb) PTEN\nc) RB\nd) Ras"}], "sampled": ["b) PTEN"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:15.682350+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 19, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.198", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "b) PTEN", "picked": "b) PTEN", "sampled": "b) PTEN", "options": ["b) PTEN"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:15.682410+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 20, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.210", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Social & Preventive Medicine\n\nSilicosis caused by ?\n\na) Gold\nb) Coal\nc) CO\nd) Silica"}], "sampled": ["d) Silica"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:15.701635+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 21, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.210", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "d) Silica", "picked": "d) Silica", "sampled": "d) Silica", "options": ["d) Silica"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:15.701671+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 22, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.211", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Social & Preventive Medicine\n\nHuman development index includes -\n\na) Crude death rate\nb) Life expectancy at one year\nc) Life expectancy at bih\nd) All"}], "sampled": ["d) All"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:15.747814+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 23, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.211", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "c) Life expectancy at bih", "picked": null, "sampled": "d) All", "options": ["c) Life expectancy at bih"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:15.747880+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 24, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.293", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Anatomy\n\nNasal septum is formed except by\n\na) Perpendicular plate of ethmoid\nb) Vomer\nc) Nasal bone\nd) Lateral cailage"}], "sampled": ["d) Lateral cartilage"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:15.763637+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 25, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.293", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "d) Lateral cailage", "picked": null, "sampled": "d) Lateral cartilage", "options": ["d) Lateral cailage"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:15.763682+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 26, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.56", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Social & Preventive Medicine\n\nTrue of case control studies -\n\na) It proceeds from cause to effect\nb) Odds ratio can be calculated\nc) Incidence can be calculated\nd) Needs many patients"}], "sampled": ["b) Odds ratio can be calculated"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:15.802399+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 27, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.56", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "b) Odds ratio can be calculated", "picked": "b) Odds ratio can be calculated", "sampled": "b) Odds ratio can be calculated", "options": ["b) Odds ratio can be calculated"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:15.802440+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 28, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.225", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Surgery\n\nThe commonest site of perforation during colonoscopy is -\n\na) Caecum\nb) Hepatic flexure\nc) Splenic flexure\nd) Sigmoid colon"}], "sampled": ["d) Sigmoid colon"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:15.811877+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 29, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.225", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "d) Sigmoid colon", "picked": "d) Sigmoid colon", "sampled": "d) Sigmoid colon", "options": ["d) Sigmoid colon"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:15.811911+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 30, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.282", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Surgery\n\nWhich of the following statement is false about hydrocele?\n\na) Arises due to patent processus vaginalis\nb) Wait for 5 years for spontaneous closure of congenital hydrocele\nc) Lord's plication of sac for small hydrocele\nd) Jaboulay's eversion of sac for medium hydrocele"}], "sampled": ["b) Wait for 5 years for spontaneous closure of congenital hydrocele."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:16.010276+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 31, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.282", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "b) Wait for 5 years for spontaneous closure of congenital hydrocele", "picked": "b) Wait for 5 years for spontaneous closure of congenital hydrocele", "sampled": "b) Wait for 5 years for spontaneous closure of congenital hydrocele.", "options": ["b) Wait for 5 years for spontaneous closure of congenital hydrocele"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:16.010320+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 32, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.108", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Biochemistry\n\nIn Familial hypercholesterolemia there is deficiency of\n\na) LDL receptor\nb) Apoprotein A\nc) Apo protein C\nd) Lipoprotein lipase"}], "sampled": ["a) LDL receptor"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:16.142652+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 33, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.108", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) LDL receptor", "picked": "a) LDL receptor", "sampled": "a) LDL receptor", "options": ["a) LDL receptor"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:16.142694+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 34, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.97", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Anatomy\n\nFollowing are fibrous joints :\n\na) Pubic symphysis\nb) Fronto parietal suture\nc) Manubrio sternal joint\nd) Inf. radio ulnar joint"}], "sampled": ["b) Fronto parietal suture"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:16.302042+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 35, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.97", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "b) Fronto parietal suture", "picked": "b) Fronto parietal suture", "sampled": "b) Fronto parietal suture", "options": ["b) Fronto parietal suture"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:16.302084+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 36, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.206", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Dental\n\nCalcium silicate based material is:\n\na) MTA\nb) Geristore\nc) Dieket\nd) Retroplast"}], "sampled": ["a) MTA"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:16.377811+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 37, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.206", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) MTA", "picked": "a) MTA", "sampled": "a) MTA", "options": ["a) MTA"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:16.377873+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 38, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.12", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Anatomy\n\nThe pharmakokinetic change occurring in geriatric patient is due to\n\na) Gastric absorption\nb) Liver metabolism\nc) Renal clearance\nd) Hypersensitivity"}], "sampled": ["b) Liver metabolism."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:16.401386+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 39, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.12", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "c) Renal clearance", "picked": null, "sampled": "b) Liver metabolism.", "options": ["c) Renal clearance"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:16.401444+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 40, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.79", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Surgery\n\nWhich of the following muscle is not a hybrid muscle\n\na) Pectoralis major\nb) Extensor digitorum\nc) Flexor digitorum profundus\nd) Brachialis"}], "sampled": ["b) Extensor digitorum"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:16.410451+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 41, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.79", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "b) Extensor digitorum", "picked": "b) Extensor digitorum", "sampled": "b) Extensor digitorum", "options": ["b) Extensor digitorum"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:16.410489+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 42, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.200", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Physiology\n\nWhich of the following is freely filtered by kidney across glomerular capillariesa)  Albumin (across glomerular capillaries)b) Globulinc) Creatinined) HCO3 e)  Glucose\n\na) cde\nb) acd\nc) bde\nd) ade"}], "sampled": ["e) Glucose"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:16.422568+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 43, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.200", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "a) cde", "picked": null, "sampled": "e) Glucose", "options": ["a) cde"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:16.422627+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 44, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.284", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Pediatrics\n\nA normally developing 10 months old child should be able to do all of the following except –\n\na) Stand alone\nb) Play peak to boo\nc) Pick up a pellet with thumb and index finger\nd) Build a tower of 3–4 cubes"}], "sampled": ["d) Build a tower of 3-4 cubes."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:16.556602+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 45, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.284", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "d) Build a tower of 3–4 cubes", "picked": null, "sampled": "d) Build a tower of 3-4 cubes.", "options": ["d) Build a tower of 3–4 cubes"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:16.556652+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 46, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.154", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Anatomy\n\nA 27-year female wearing high heels stumbled and sustained inversion injury at ankle. Which ligament is most likely to be injured in the given case?\n\na) A\nb) B\nc) C\nd) D"}], "sampled": ["c) C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:16.648115+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 47, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.154", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "a) A", "picked": null, "sampled": "c) C", "options": ["a) A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:16.648152+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 48, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.80", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Surgery\n\nDelayed union of fracture of a bone follo-wing a surgical treatment may be due to\n\na) Infection\nb) Inadequate circulation\nc) Inadequate mobilization\nd) All of the above"}], "sampled": ["d) All of the above"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:16.856443+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 49, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.80", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "d) All of the above", "picked": "d) All of the above", "sampled": "d) All of the above", "options": ["d) All of the above"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:16.856524+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 50, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.276", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Medicine\n\nA female child with virilization, hypertension with low plasma renin diagnosis is :\n\na) 21α hydroxylase deficiency\nb) 11 β hydroxylase deficiency\nc) 3β hydroxylase deficiency\nd) Conn’s syndrome"}], "sampled": ["a) 21α hydroxylase deficiency"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:17.017528+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 51, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.276", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "b) 11 β hydroxylase deficiency", "picked": null, "sampled": "a) 21α hydroxylase deficiency", "options": ["b) 11 β hydroxylase deficiency"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:17.017565+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 52, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.192", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Medicine\n\nWhich test is not useful in a patient with history of Syncopal attack?\n\na) Electrophysiological testing\nb) Tilt Table testing\nc) PET Scan\nd) Holter monitoring"}], "sampled": ["c) PET Scan"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:17.038793+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 53, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.192", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "c) PET Scan", "picked": "c) PET Scan", "sampled": "c) PET Scan", "options": ["c) PET Scan"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:17.038834+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 54, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.164", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Physiology\n\nWhich of the following is released from hypothalamus?\n\na) Orexin\nb) Cortisol releasing hormone\nc) Neuropeptide\nd) Ghrelin"}], "sampled": ["a) Orexin"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:17.060572+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 55, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.164", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "b) Cortisol releasing hormone", "picked": null, "sampled": "a) Orexin", "options": ["b) Cortisol releasing hormone"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:17.060622+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 56, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.119", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Orthopaedics\n\nOrtolani's test is done for\n\na) Congenial dislocation of the knee joints\nb) Congenital dislocation of the hip joints\nc) Congenital dislocation of the shoulder joints\nd) Congenital dislocation of the elbow joints"}], "sampled": ["b) Congenital dislocation of the hip joints"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:17.085765+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 57, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.119", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "b) Congenital dislocation of the hip joints", "picked": "b) Congenital dislocation of the hip joints", "sampled": "b) Congenital dislocation of the hip joints", "options": ["b) Congenital dislocation of the hip joints"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:17.085805+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 58, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.153", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Surgery\n\nHeadache, apathy and deteriorating level of consciousness occurring weeks after head injury suggests;\n\na) Chronic subdral haematoma.\nb) Pontine hemorrhage\nc) Continuing cerebral.\nd) Depressed skull fracture."}], "sampled": ["a) Chronic subdural hematoma."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:17.376897+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 59, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.153", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "a) Chronic subdral haematoma.", "picked": null, "sampled": "a) Chronic subdural hematoma.", "options": ["a) Chronic subdral haematoma."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:17.376955+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 60, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.147", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Microbiology\n\nWhich of the following ultrasound finding has the highest association with aneuploidy?\n\na) Choroid plexus cyst\nb) Nuchal translucency\nc) Cystic hygroma\nd) Single umbilical aery"}], "sampled": ["b) Nuchal translucency"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:17.385688+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 61, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.147", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "c) Cystic hygroma", "picked": null, "sampled": "b) Nuchal translucency", "options": ["c) Cystic hygroma"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:17.385724+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 62, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.70", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Pathology\n\nAtherosclerosis initiation by fibroblast plaque is mediated by injury to ?\n\na) Smooth muscle\nb) Media\nc) Adventitia\nd) Endothelium"}], "sampled": ["d) Endothelium"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:17.570441+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 63, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.70", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "d) Endothelium", "picked": "d) Endothelium", "sampled": "d) Endothelium", "options": ["d) Endothelium"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:17.570475+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 64, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.281", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Anatomy\n\nTrue statements about parotid gland\n\na) Duct opens oppsite to upper 2nd molar tooth\nb) Duct pierces Masseter\nc) Develops from ectoderm\nd) Secretomotor fibres come from facial nerve"}], "sampled": ["d) Secretomotor fibres come from facial nerve."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:17.620858+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 65, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.281", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "a) Duct opens oppsite to upper 2nd molar tooth", "picked": null, "sampled": "d) Secretomotor fibres come from facial nerve.", "options": ["a) Duct opens oppsite to upper 2nd molar tooth"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:17.620910+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 66, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.195", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Anatomy\n\nIn a 24 year old man weight of the upper limb is transmitted to the axial skeleton by:\n\na) Coracoacromial ligament\nb) Coracoclavicular ligament\nc) Costoclavicular ligament\nd) Coracohumeral ligament"}], "sampled": ["b) Coracoclavicular ligament"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:17.641495+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 67, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.195", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "b) Coracoclavicular ligament", "picked": "b) Coracoclavicular ligament", "sampled": "b) Coracoclavicular ligament", "options": ["b) Coracoclavicular ligament"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:17.641530+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 68, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.23", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Social & Preventive Medicine\n\nNormal waist hip ratio of a female is below\n\na) 0.7\nb) 0.8\nc) 0.9\nd) 1"}], "sampled": ["a) 0.7"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:17.661156+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 69, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.23", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "b) 0.8", "picked": null, "sampled": "a) 0.7", "options": ["b) 0.8"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:17.661187+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 70, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.260", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Surgery\n\nIn which case cystometric study is indicated -\n\na) Neurogenic bladder\nb) Stress incontinence\nc) Fistula\nd) Urge incontinence"}], "sampled": ["a) Neurogenic bladder"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:17.682299+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 71, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.260", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) Neurogenic bladder", "picked": "a) Neurogenic bladder", "sampled": "a) Neurogenic bladder", "options": ["a) Neurogenic bladder"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:17.682364+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 72, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.148", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Biochemistry\n\nWhich of the following is not a component of transpo system?\n\na) Receptor activation\nb) Selective gate\nc) Non-selective channel\nd) Energy coupling system"}], "sampled": ["c) Non-selective channel"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:17.702810+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 73, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.148", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "a) Receptor activation", "picked": null, "sampled": "c) Non-selective channel", "options": ["a) Receptor activation"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:17.702902+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 74, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.214", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Microbiology\n\nBudding reproduction in tissue is seen in\n\na) Cryptococcus, candida\nb) Candida, rhizopus\nc) Rhizopus, mucor\nd) Histoplasma, candida"}], "sampled": ["a) Cryptococcus, candida"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:17.708420+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 75, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.214", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) Cryptococcus, candida", "picked": "a) Cryptococcus, candida", "sampled": "a) Cryptococcus, candida", "options": ["a) Cryptococcus, candida"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:17.708510+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 76, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.122", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Medicine\n\nWhich of the following may be seen in second degree Hea block (select three options):\n\na) Change in QRS complex morphology\nb) Atrial rate more than ventricular rate\nc) Prolonged conduction time\nd) All of the above"}], "sampled": ["Answer: a, c"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:17.745868+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 77, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.122", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "d) All of the above", "picked": null, "sampled": "Answer: a, c", "options": ["d) All of the above"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:17.745925+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 78, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.272", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Physiology\n\nPain-sensitive intracranial structure is:\n\na) Piamater\nb) Pial vassels\nc) Duramater\nd) Brain matter"}], "sampled": ["c) Duramater"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:18.244808+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 79, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.272", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "c) Duramater", "picked": "c) Duramater", "sampled": "c) Duramater", "options": ["c) Duramater"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:18.244853+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 80, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.104", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Pathology\n\nA 28 year old female teacher is found to have a prolonged bleeding time and normal platelet count. She had a bleeding of \"easy bleeding\" with frequent bleeding of the gums, epistaxis, cutaneous bleeding and menorrhagia, further testing revealed a deficiency of Von willebrand factor. Which of the following thrombogenic processes involving platelets is most directly impaired?\n\na) Adhesion\nb) Aggregation\nc) Formation of fibrinogen bridges\nd) Conformational change with activation of phospholipid surface"}], "sampled": ["a) Adhesion"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:18.246320+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 81, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.104", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) Adhesion", "picked": "a) Adhesion", "sampled": "a) Adhesion", "options": ["a) Adhesion"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:18.246353+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 82, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.264", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Microbiology\n\nSedimentation coefficient of Ig E is:\n\na) 7S\nb) 8S\nc) 11S\nd) 20 S"}], "sampled": ["a) 7S"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:18.262646+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 83, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.264", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "b) 8S", "picked": null, "sampled": "a) 7S", "options": ["b) 8S"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:18.262684+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 84, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.151", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Pathology\n\nTest used for factor VIII deficiency identification is-\n\na) PT\nb) APTT\nc) D dimer\nd) FDP"}], "sampled": ["b) APTT"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:18.379191+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 85, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.151", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "b) APTT", "picked": "b) APTT", "sampled": "b) APTT", "options": ["b) APTT"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:18.379240+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 86, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.188", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Pathology\n\nMediastinal lymph node calcification is seen in which one of the following-\n\na) Metastatic neoplasm\nb) Lymphoma\nc) Sarcoidosis\nd) Bronchiectasis"}], "sampled": ["c) Sarcoidosis"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:18.406596+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 87, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.188", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "c) Sarcoidosis", "picked": "c) Sarcoidosis", "sampled": "c) Sarcoidosis", "options": ["c) Sarcoidosis"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:18.406640+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 88, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.68", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Physiology\n\nWhich of the following is measured by the device, Bellow's spirometer?\n\na) TLC\nb) RV\nc) Closing volume\nd) ERV"}], "sampled": ["a) TLC"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:18.544182+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 89, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.68", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "d) ERV", "picked": null, "sampled": "a) TLC", "options": ["d) ERV"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:18.544232+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 90, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.134", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Biochemistry\n\nRate limiting step in cholesterol synthesis is catalysed by which of the following enzyme?\n\na) HMG CoA synthetase\nb) HMG CoA reductase\nc) Thiokinase\nd) Mevalonate kinase"}], "sampled": ["b) HMG CoA reductase"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:18.605095+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 91, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.134", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "b) HMG CoA reductase", "picked": "b) HMG CoA reductase", "sampled": "b) HMG CoA reductase", "options": ["b) HMG CoA reductase"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:18.605132+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 92, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.144", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Medicine\n\nFlipped LDH indicating Myocardial Infarction is represented by:\n\na) LDH-1> LDH-2\nb) LDH-2 > LDH-1\nc) LDH-4 > LDH-5\nd) LDH-5 > LDH-4"}], "sampled": ["a) LDH-1> LDH-2"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:18.646342+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 93, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.144", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) LDH-1> LDH-2", "picked": "a) LDH-1> LDH-2", "sampled": "a) LDH-1> LDH-2", "options": ["a) LDH-1> LDH-2"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:18.646379+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 94, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.166", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Anatomy\n\nWhich statement best describes the cranial fossa?\n\na) The middle cranial fossa contains the cribriform plate.\nb) The anterior cranial fossa contains the pituitary gland.\nc) The middle cranial fossa is floored by the sphenoid and temporal bones.\nd) The internal acoustic meatus lies in the middle cranial fossa."}], "sampled": ["b) The anterior cranial fossa contains the pituitary gland."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:18.696745+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 95, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.166", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "c) The middle cranial fossa is floored by the sphenoid and temporal bones.", "picked": null, "sampled": "b) The anterior cranial fossa contains the pituitary gland.", "options": ["c) The middle cranial fossa is floored by the sphenoid and temporal bones."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:18.696811+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 96, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.51", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Social & Preventive Medicine\n\nPre-exposure prophylaxis for rabies is given on days\n\na) 0, 3, 7, 14, 28, 90\nb) 0, 3, 7, 28, 90\nc) 0, 3\nd) 0, 7, 28"}], "sampled": ["a) 0, 3, 7, 14, 28, 90"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:18.745115+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 97, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.51", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "d) 0, 7, 28", "picked": null, "sampled": "a) 0, 3, 7, 14, 28, 90", "options": ["d) 0, 7, 28"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:18.745155+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 98, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.138", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Medicine\n\nInvestigations in a clinically suspected case of tuberculosis -\n\na) Mantoux (in children)\nb) Sputum AFB\nc) Bactec\nd) All of the above"}], "sampled": ["d) All of the above"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:18.923426+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 99, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.138", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "d) All of the above", "picked": "d) All of the above", "sampled": "d) All of the above", "options": ["d) All of the above"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:18.923466+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 100, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.142", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Ophthalmology\n\nGrave's ophthalmopathy mostly presents as September 2010\n\na) Proptosis\nb) Ptosis\nc) Reduced intraocular tension\nd) Increased power of convergence"}], "sampled": ["a) Proptosis"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:19.021432+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 101, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.142", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) Proptosis", "picked": "a) Proptosis", "sampled": "a) Proptosis", "options": ["a) Proptosis"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:19.021477+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 102, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.197", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Pharmacology\n\nSchizophrenia is treated by:\n\na) Anti depressants\nb) Anti psychotics\nc) Anti epileptics\nd) Mood stabilizers"}], "sampled": ["b) Anti psychotics"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:19.116729+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 103, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.197", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "b) Anti psychotics", "picked": "b) Anti psychotics", "sampled": "b) Anti psychotics", "options": ["b) Anti psychotics"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:19.116768+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 104, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.140", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Microbiology\n\nFries test is used in the diagnosis of:\n\na) Gonorrhoea\nb) Herpes\nc) Chanchroid\nd) Granuloma venereum"}], "sampled": ["Answer: d) Granuloma venereum"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:19.144989+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 105, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.140", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "d) Granuloma venereum", "picked": null, "sampled": "Answer: d) Granuloma venereum", "options": ["d) Granuloma venereum"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:19.145031+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 106, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.190", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Social & Preventive Medicine\n\nThe number of doses recommended for oral Ty21a typhoid vaccine is:\n\na) 14\nb) 5\nc) 3\nd) 1"}], "sampled": ["b) 5"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:19.199792+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 107, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.190", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "c) 3", "picked": null, "sampled": "b) 5", "options": ["c) 3"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:19.199859+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 108, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.189", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Ophthalmology\n\n\"Candle-wax spots\" in the retina are present in\n\na) Sarcoidosis\nb) Toxoplasmosis\nc) Syphilis\nd) Tuberculosis"}], "sampled": ["c) Syphilis"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:19.260577+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 109, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.189", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "a) Sarcoidosis", "picked": null, "sampled": "c) Syphilis", "options": ["a) Sarcoidosis"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:19.260616+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 110, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.62", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Orthopaedics\n\nPosition of limb in posterior dislocation of hip -\n\na) Flexion, abduction & external rotation\nb) Flexion, adduction & internal rotation\nc) Flexion, adduction & external rotation\nd) Flexion, abduction & internal rotation"}], "sampled": ["a) Flexion, abduction & external rotation"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:19.387034+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 111, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.62", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "b) Flexion, adduction & internal rotation", "picked": null, "sampled": "a) Flexion, abduction & external rotation", "options": ["b) Flexion, adduction & internal rotation"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:19.387096+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 112, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.1", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Biochemistry\n\nWhich vitamin is supplied from only animal source:\n\na) Vitamin C\nb) Vitamin B7\nc) Vitamin B12\nd) Vitamin D"}], "sampled": ["c) Vitamin B12"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:19.396190+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 113, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.1", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "c) Vitamin B12", "picked": "c) Vitamin B12", "sampled": "c) Vitamin B12", "options": ["c) Vitamin B12"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:19.396228+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 114, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.53", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Forensic Medicine\n\nBest indicator of antemoum drowning is :\n\na) Froth in mouth and nostrils\nb) Cutis anserina\nc) Washerman's hand\nd) Water in nose"}], "sampled": ["a) Froth in mouth and nostrils"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:19.643480+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 115, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.53", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) Froth in mouth and nostrils", "picked": "a) Froth in mouth and nostrils", "sampled": "a) Froth in mouth and nostrils", "options": ["a) Froth in mouth and nostrils"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:19.643527+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 116, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.253", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Social & Preventive Medicine\n\nDrug of choice for Falciparum Malaria is:-\n\na) Chloroquine\nb) Mefloquine\nc) ACT\nd) Proguanil"}], "sampled": ["c) ACT"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:19.728454+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 117, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.253", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "c) ACT", "picked": "c) ACT", "sampled": "c) ACT", "options": ["c) ACT"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:19.728531+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 118, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.226", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Medicine\n\nA 74-year-old woman develops occipital headache, vomiting, and dizziness. She looks unwell, her blood pressure is 180/100 mm Hg, pulse is 70/min, and respirations are 30/min. She is unable to sit or walk because of unsteadiness. Over the next few hours, she develops a decline in her level of consciousness.For the above patient with altered level of consciousness, select the most likely diagnosis.\n\na) basal ganglia hemorrhage\nb) cerebellar hemorrhage\nc) pontine hemorrhage\nd) lobar intracerebral hemorrhage"}], "sampled": ["d) lobar intracerebral hemorrhage"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:19.918921+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 119, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.226", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "b) cerebellar hemorrhage", "picked": null, "sampled": "d) lobar intracerebral hemorrhage", "options": ["b) cerebellar hemorrhage"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:19.919012+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 120, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.98", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Forensic Medicine\n\nFor exhumation the order should be passed by -\n\na) Chief judicial magistrate\nb) Executive magistrate\nc) Police officer\nd) Session judge"}], "sampled": ["a) Chief judicial magistrate"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:19.937917+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 121, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.98", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "b) Executive magistrate", "picked": null, "sampled": "a) Chief judicial magistrate", "options": ["b) Executive magistrate"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:19.937963+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 122, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.230", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Surgery\n\nTrendlenburg's test done for varicose veins is for detection of:\n\na) Perforator in competency\nb) Deep veins patency\nc) Saphenofemoral incompetency\nd) Site of perforators"}], "sampled": ["c) Saphenofemoral incompetency"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:20.088824+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 123, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.230", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "c) Saphenofemoral incompetency", "picked": "c) Saphenofemoral incompetency", "sampled": "c) Saphenofemoral incompetency", "options": ["c) Saphenofemoral incompetency"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:20.088861+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 124, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.239", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Social & Preventive Medicine\n\nProposed guideline value for Radioactivity in drinking water is:\n\na) Gross a activity 0.1 Bq/L and Gross b activity 1.0 Bq/L\nb) Gross a activity 1.0 Bq/L adn Gross b activity 0.1 Bq/L\nc) Gross a activity 1.0 Bq/L and Gross b activity 10.0 Bq/L\nd) Gross a activity 10 Bq/L and Gross b activity 1.0 Bq/L"}], "sampled": ["a) Gross a activity 0.1 Bq/L and Gross b activity 1.0 Bq/L"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:20.363273+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 125, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.239", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) Gross a activity 0.1 Bq/L and Gross b activity 1.0 Bq/L", "picked": "a) Gross a activity 0.1 Bq/L and Gross b activity 1.0 Bq/L", "sampled": "a) Gross a activity 0.1 Bq/L and Gross b activity 1.0 Bq/L", "options": ["a) Gross a activity 0.1 Bq/L and Gross b activity 1.0 Bq/L"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:20.363324+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 126, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.159", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Anaesthesia\n\nRole of egg lecithin in propofol formulation is?\n\na) Acts as emulsifying agent\nb) Acts as preservative\nc) Acts as carrier vehicle\nd) Acts as antibacterial"}], "sampled": ["a) Acts as emulsifying agent"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:20.401075+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 127, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.159", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) Acts as emulsifying agent", "picked": "a) Acts as emulsifying agent", "sampled": "a) Acts as emulsifying agent", "options": ["a) Acts as emulsifying agent"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:20.401115+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 128, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.88", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Pathology\n\nHamartomatous lung tissue is?\n\na) Hypoplasia of lung\nb) Congenital cyst\nc) Lobar sequestration\nd) Congenital cystic adenomatoid malformation"}], "sampled": ["d) Congenital cystic adenomatoid malformation"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:20.411155+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 129, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.88", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "d) Congenital cystic adenomatoid malformation", "picked": "d) Congenital cystic adenomatoid malformation", "sampled": "d) Congenital cystic adenomatoid malformation", "options": ["d) Congenital cystic adenomatoid malformation"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:20.411198+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 130, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.61", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Medicine\n\nS2 is best appreciated in -\n\na) 3rd left intercostal space\nb) 2nd right intercostal space\nc) 4th left intercostal space\nd) 5th left intercostal space"}], "sampled": ["a) 3rd left intercostal space"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:20.417455+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 131, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.61", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) 3rd left intercostal space", "picked": "a) 3rd left intercostal space", "sampled": "a) 3rd left intercostal space", "options": ["a) 3rd left intercostal space"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:20.417497+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 132, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.29", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Anatomy\n\nLymph vessel which drain the posterior 1/3 rd of the tongue:\n\na) Basal vessel.\nb) Marginal vessel.\nc) Central vessel.\nd) Lateral vessel."}], "sampled": ["d) Lateral vessel."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:20.512633+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 133, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.29", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "a) Basal vessel.", "picked": null, "sampled": "d) Lateral vessel.", "options": ["a) Basal vessel."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:20.512700+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 134, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.40", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Ophthalmology\n\nFollowing are the causes of sudden loss of vision except ?\n\na) Angle closure glaucoma\nb) Endophthalmitis\nc) Central serous retinopathy\nd) Corneal ulceration"}], "sampled": ["c) Central serous retinopathy"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:20.521491+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 135, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.40", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "d) Corneal ulceration", "picked": null, "sampled": "c) Central serous retinopathy", "options": ["d) Corneal ulceration"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:20.521551+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 136, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.84", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Surgery\n\nDuring extraction of the upper first molar, the mesio buccal root is missing and is suspected to have been pushed into the maxillary sinus.\nThe best position for the patient immediately after the incident is\n\na) To position the patient upright\nb) To position the patients in a semi inclined posture to visualize the perforation\nc) Trendelenberg position\nd) Reverse trendelenberg position"}], "sampled": ["b) To position the patients in a semi inclined posture to visualize the perforation"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:20.530558+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 137, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.84", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "a) To position the patient upright", "picked": null, "sampled": "b) To position the patients in a semi inclined posture to visualize the perforation", "options": ["a) To position the patient upright"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:20.530690+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 138, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.114", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Surgery\n\nAll are true about Cancer breast, except:\n\na) Affected sibling is a risk factor\nb) Paget's disease of nipple is intraductal type of CA\nc) Common in aged nulliparous\nd) Increased incidence with prolonged breast feeding"}], "sampled": ["d) Increased incidence with prolonged breast feeding."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:20.648083+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 139, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.114", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "d) Increased incidence with prolonged breast feeding", "picked": "d) Increased incidence with prolonged breast feeding", "sampled": "d) Increased incidence with prolonged breast feeding.", "options": ["d) Increased incidence with prolonged breast feeding"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:20.648130+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 140, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.77", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Medicine\n\nA 14-year-old girl presents with quadriparesis, facial palsy, winging of scapula and ptosis. There is h/o similar illness in father and brother but less severe. Her CPK level is also raised (500IU/L). She is probably suffering from?\n\na) Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy\nb) Becker muscular dystrophy\nc) Limb-girdle dystrophy\nd) Scapulofaciohumeral dystrophy"}], "sampled": ["d) Scapulofaciohumeral dystrophy"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:20.977807+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 141, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.77", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "d) Scapulofaciohumeral dystrophy", "picked": "d) Scapulofaciohumeral dystrophy", "sampled": "d) Scapulofaciohumeral dystrophy", "options": ["d) Scapulofaciohumeral dystrophy"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:20.977840+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 142, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.76", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Ophthalmology\n\nHypersecretory glaucoma is seen in –\n\na) Epidemic dropsy\nb) Marfan's syndrome\nc) Hypertension\nd) Diabetes"}], "sampled": ["a) Epidemic dropsy"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:21.066224+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 143, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.76", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) Epidemic dropsy", "picked": "a) Epidemic dropsy", "sampled": "a) Epidemic dropsy", "options": ["a) Epidemic dropsy"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:21.066265+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 144, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.263", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Pathology\n\nA 49-year-old female taking ibuprofen for increasing joint pain in her hands presents with increasing pain in her midsternal area. Gastroscopy reveals multiple, scattered, punctate hemorrhagic areas in her gastric mucosa. Biopsies from one of these hemorrhagic lesions reveal mucosal erosions with edema and hemorrhage. No mucosal ulceration is seen.\n\na) Active chronic gastritis\nb) Acute gastritis\nc) Autoimmune gastritis\nd) Chronic gastritis"}], "sampled": ["b) Acute gastritis"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:21.071375+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 145, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.263", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "b) Acute gastritis", "picked": "b) Acute gastritis", "sampled": "b) Acute gastritis", "options": ["b) Acute gastritis"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:21.071410+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 146, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.129", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Surgery\n\nA 60 yr old chronic smoker presents with painless gross hematuria of 1 day duration. Which is the investigation of choice to know the cause of hematuria?\n\na) USG\nb) X-ray KUB\nc) Urine routine\nd) Urine microscopy for malignant cytology cells"}], "sampled": ["d) Urine microscopy for malignant cytology cells"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:21.156382+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 147, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.129", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "d) Urine microscopy for malignant cytology cells", "picked": "d) Urine microscopy for malignant cytology cells", "sampled": "d) Urine microscopy for malignant cytology cells", "options": ["d) Urine microscopy for malignant cytology cells"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:21.156433+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 148, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.25", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Forensic Medicine\n\nA 6hours old snake bite patient comes to emergency with mild local edema at the injury site. On examination no abnormalities detected and lab repos are normal. Most appropriate management is\n\na) Incision and suction\nb) Wait and watch\nc) Local subcutaneous antisnake venom\nd) Intravenous antisnake venom"}], "sampled": ["b) Wait and watch"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:21.176749+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 149, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.25", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "b) Wait and watch", "picked": "b) Wait and watch", "sampled": "b) Wait and watch", "options": ["b) Wait and watch"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:21.176788+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 150, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.178", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Psychiatry\n\nSymptomatic treatment is not required in withdrawal of:\n\na) Cannabis\nb) Morphine\nc) Alcohol\nd) Cocaine"}], "sampled": ["a) Cannabis"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:21.240529+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 151, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.178", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) Cannabis", "picked": "a) Cannabis", "sampled": "a) Cannabis", "options": ["a) Cannabis"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:21.240727+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 152, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.267", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Pathology\n\nA 40-year-old man presents with a 2-week history of recur- rent oral ulcers, genital ulcers, intermittent arthritic pain of the knees, and abdominal pain. Physical examination reveals shallow ulcerations of the mucosa of the glans penis, as well as oral aphthous ulcers and conjunctivitis. Which of the following is the most likely diagnosis?\n\na) Behyet disease\nb) Genital herpes\nc) Gonorrhea\nd) Polyarteritis nodosa"}], "sampled": ["a) Behcet disease"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:21.276896+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 153, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.267", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "a) Behyet disease", "picked": null, "sampled": "a) Behcet disease", "options": ["a) Behyet disease"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:21.276934+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 154, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.24", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Medicine\n\nThe most common cause of renal scaring in a 3 year old child is -\n\na) Trauma\nb) Tuberculosis\nc) Vesicoureteral reflux induced pyelonephritis\nd) Interstitial nephritis"}], "sampled": ["c) Vesicoureteral reflux induced pyelonephritis"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:21.433878+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 155, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.24", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "c) Vesicoureteral reflux induced pyelonephritis", "picked": "c) Vesicoureteral reflux induced pyelonephritis", "sampled": "c) Vesicoureteral reflux induced pyelonephritis", "options": ["c) Vesicoureteral reflux induced pyelonephritis"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:21.433916+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 156, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.50", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Social & Preventive Medicine\n\nTrue statement regarding specific death rates\n\na) Specific for age and sex\nb) Identify particular group or groups \"at risk\" for preventive action\nc) Find out cause or disease specific\nd) All of the above"}], "sampled": ["d) All of the above"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:21.607129+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 157, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.50", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "d) All of the above", "picked": "d) All of the above", "sampled": "d) All of the above", "options": ["d) All of the above"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:21.607168+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 158, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.219", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Surgery\n\nBacterial pyogenic parotitis affecting the parotid gland is most common after: March 2008\n\na) Uveo-parotid fever\nb) Mumps\nc) Debilitation after major surgery\nd) After administration of iodine"}], "sampled": ["b) Mumps"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:21.712168+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 159, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.219", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "c) Debilitation after major surgery", "picked": null, "sampled": "b) Mumps", "options": ["c) Debilitation after major surgery"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:21.712222+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 160, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.109", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Microbiology\n\nBotulinum affects all of the following, EXCEPT:\n\na) Neuromuscular junction\nb) Preganglionic junction\nc) Post ganglionic nerves\nd) CNS"}], "sampled": ["b) Preganglionic junction"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:21.753662+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 161, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.109", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "d) CNS", "picked": null, "sampled": "b) Preganglionic junction", "options": ["d) CNS"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:21.753708+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 162, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.290", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Microbiology\n\nThe process of destroying all microbes including spores is called :\n\na) Disinfection\nb) Antisepsis\nc) Asepsis\nd) Sterilization"}], "sampled": ["d) Sterilization"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:21.772034+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 163, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.290", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "d) Sterilization", "picked": "d) Sterilization", "sampled": "d) Sterilization", "options": ["d) Sterilization"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:21.772098+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 164, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.183", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Forensic Medicine\n\nStatuary rape is -\n\na) Less than 15 years\nb) Less than 16 years\nc) Less than 18 years\nd) Less than 20 years"}], "sampled": ["c) Less than 18 years"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:22.053784+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 165, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.183", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "c) Less than 18 years", "picked": "c) Less than 18 years", "sampled": "c) Less than 18 years", "options": ["c) Less than 18 years"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:22.053823+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 166, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.181", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Microbiology\n\nStaphylococcus aureus does not cause which of the following skin infection:\n\na) Ecthyma gangrenosum\nb) Bullous impetigo\nc) Botryomycosis\nd) Cellulitis"}], "sampled": ["c) Botryomycosis"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:22.104452+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 167, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.181", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "a) Ecthyma gangrenosum", "picked": null, "sampled": "c) Botryomycosis", "options": ["a) Ecthyma gangrenosum"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:22.104491+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 168, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.33", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Gynaecology & Obstetrics\n\nRegarding vaginal candidiasis which one of the following is false:\n\na) Cottage cheese like secretions are seen\nb) Intense pruritus\nc) Most common in non-pregnant women\nd) Buds and hyphae seen in KOH preparation"}], "sampled": ["c) Most common in non-pregnant women."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:22.165153+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 169, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.33", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "c) Most common in non-pregnant women", "picked": "c) Most common in non-pregnant women", "sampled": "c) Most common in non-pregnant women.", "options": ["c) Most common in non-pregnant women"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:22.165189+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 170, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.265", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Pharmacology\n\nDNA dependent RNA synthesis is inhibited by:\n\na) Rifampicin\nb) Ethambutol\nc) Colchicine\nd) Chloromycetin"}], "sampled": ["a) Rifampicin"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:22.172907+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 171, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.265", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) Rifampicin", "picked": "a) Rifampicin", "sampled": "a) Rifampicin", "options": ["a) Rifampicin"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:22.172940+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 172, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.31", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Orthopaedics\n\nAll are True about Acute Osteomyelitis except\n\na) Common in children\nb) Severe pain\nc) Involves Epiphyseal plate\nd) Treatment involves 6 weeks of Antibiotics"}], "sampled": ["d) Treatment involves 6 weeks of Antibiotics."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:22.259411+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 173, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.31", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "c) Involves Epiphyseal plate", "picked": null, "sampled": "d) Treatment involves 6 weeks of Antibiotics.", "options": ["c) Involves Epiphyseal plate"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:22.259455+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 174, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.28", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Social & Preventive Medicine\n\nWhat is the best method of informing the rural population about Oral rehydration technique: March 2013 (d, f)\n\na) Chalk and talk/Lecture\nb) Demonstrations\nc) Role play\nd) Flash cards"}], "sampled": ["d) Flash cards"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:22.380670+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 175, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.28", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "b) Demonstrations", "picked": null, "sampled": "d) Flash cards", "options": ["b) Demonstrations"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:22.380712+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 176, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.269", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Biochemistry\n\nIn which phase of cell cycle, proof reading occurs?\n\na) G1\nb) S\nc) G2\nd) M"}], "sampled": ["b) S"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:22.397405+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 177, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.269", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "b) S", "picked": "b) S", "sampled": "b) S", "options": ["b) S"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:22.397458+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 178, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.112", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Forensic Medicine\n\nWhich of the following condition is necessary prerequisite for this change?\n\na) Rupture of membranes\nb) Scanty liquor amnii\nc) Adequate liquor amnii\nd) Air inside the uterine cavity"}], "sampled": ["The question is incomplete and does not provide enough information to determine the correct answer. Please provide more context or information."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:22.593173+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 179, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.112", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "c) Adequate liquor amnii", "picked": null, "sampled": "The question is incomplete and does not provide enough information to determine the correct answer. Please provide more context or information.", "options": ["c) Adequate liquor amnii"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:22.593230+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 180, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.288", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Forensic Medicine\n\nHyoid bone fracture most common occurs in ?\n\na) Manual strangulation\nb) Hanging\nc) Smothering\nd) Traumatic asphyxia"}], "sampled": ["a) Manual strangulation"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:22.687715+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 181, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.288", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) Manual strangulation", "picked": "a) Manual strangulation", "sampled": "a) Manual strangulation", "options": ["a) Manual strangulation"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:22.687768+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 182, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.270", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Biochemistry\n\nThe number of ATPs generated in krebs cycleare ?\n\na) 12\nb) 24\nc) 15\nd) 30"}], "sampled": ["The answer is a) 12."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:22.732235+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 183, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.270", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "b) 24", "picked": null, "sampled": "The answer is a) 12.", "options": ["b) 24"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:22.732279+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 184, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.13", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Microbiology\n\nTrue regarding lag phase is?\n\na) Time taken to adpt in the new environment\nb) Growth occurs exponentially\nc) The plateau in lag phase is due to cell death\nd) It is the 2nd phase in bacterial growth curve"}], "sampled": ["b) Growth occurs exponentially."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:22.739885+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 185, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.13", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "a) Time taken to adpt in the new environment", "picked": null, "sampled": "b) Growth occurs exponentially.", "options": ["a) Time taken to adpt in the new environment"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:22.739933+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 186, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.279", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Pharmacology\n\nWhich of the following drugs is antipseudomonal penicillin?\n\na) Cephalexin\nb) Dicloxacillin\nc) Piperacillin\nd) Cloxacillin"}], "sampled": ["c) Piperacillin"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:22.761694+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 187, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.279", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "c) Piperacillin", "picked": "c) Piperacillin", "sampled": "c) Piperacillin", "options": ["c) Piperacillin"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:22.761738+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 188, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.268", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Pharmacology\n\nAbout biotransformation not true ?\n\na) Active metabolite generation\nb) Polar to less polar\nc) Less polar to more polar\nd) Generate active drug from prodrug"}], "sampled": ["c) Less polar to more polar"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:22.812492+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 189, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.268", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "b) Polar to less polar", "picked": null, "sampled": "c) Less polar to more polar", "options": ["b) Polar to less polar"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:22.812528+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 190, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.71", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Physiology\n\nThe WBC that is considered “second line of defence” is:\n\na) Neutrophil\nb) Eosinophil\nc) Basophil\nd) Monocyte"}], "sampled": ["d) Monocyte"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:23.035230+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 191, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.71", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "d) Monocyte", "picked": "d) Monocyte", "sampled": "d) Monocyte", "options": ["d) Monocyte"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:23.035339+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 192, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.257", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Social & Preventive Medicine\n\nNeuro lathyrism results due to\n\na) Aflatoxin\nb) Pyruvic acid\nc) BOAA\nd) Sanguinarine"}], "sampled": ["c) BOAA"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:23.184311+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 193, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.257", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "c) BOAA", "picked": "c) BOAA", "sampled": "c) BOAA", "options": ["c) BOAA"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:23.184371+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 194, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.243", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Pediatrics\n\nIn RDS all of the following statements are true except\n\na) Usually occurs in infants born before 34 weeks of gestation\nb) Is more common in babies born to diabetic mothers\nc) Leads to cyanosis\nd) Is treated by administering 100% oxygen"}], "sampled": ["b) Is more common in babies born to diabetic mothers"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:23.315337+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 195, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.243", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "d) Is treated by administering 100% oxygen", "picked": null, "sampled": "b) Is more common in babies born to diabetic mothers", "options": ["d) Is treated by administering 100% oxygen"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:23.315398+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 196, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.177", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Medicine\n\nA patient with cushinoid features presents with hemoptysis; he shows no response to dexamethasone suppression test; most likely diagnosis here is:\n\na) Adrenal hyperplasia\nb) Adrenal adenoma\nc) Ca lung with ectopic ACTH production\nd) Pituitary microadenoma"}], "sampled": ["c) Ca lung with ectopic ACTH production"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:23.324136+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 197, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.177", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "c) Ca lung with ectopic ACTH production", "picked": "c) Ca lung with ectopic ACTH production", "sampled": "c) Ca lung with ectopic ACTH production", "options": ["c) Ca lung with ectopic ACTH production"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:23.324219+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 198, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.66", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Anatomy\n\nAll of the following structure lies outside the cavernous sinus except\n\na) Sphenoidal air sinus\nb) Internal carotid aery\nc) Foramen lacerum\nd) Maxillary nerve"}], "sampled": ["b) Internal carotid artery"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:23.363147+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 199, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.66", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "d) Maxillary nerve", "picked": null, "sampled": "b) Internal carotid artery", "options": ["d) Maxillary nerve"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:23.363183+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 200, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.205", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Dental\n\nTwo or more parallel vertical surfaces of abutment teeth shaped to direct the prosthesis during placement and removal, are known as:\n\na) Orientation plane\nb) Parallel block out\nc) Survey lines\nd) Guiding planes"}], "sampled": ["d) Guiding planes"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:23.425387+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 201, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.205", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "d) Guiding planes", "picked": "d) Guiding planes", "sampled": "d) Guiding planes", "options": ["d) Guiding planes"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:23.425424+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 202, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.145", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Dental\n\nDimension stability of hydrocollids may be achieved by\n\na) optimizing w:p\nb) using cold water\nc) prolonged manipulation\nd) using humidor"}], "sampled": ["a) optimizing w:p"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:23.456097+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 203, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.145", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "d) using humidor", "picked": null, "sampled": "a) optimizing w:p", "options": ["d) using humidor"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:23.456139+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 204, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.207", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Anaesthesia\n\nWhich of the following statements about Total Infra–Venous Anaesthesia (TIVA) is true –\n\na) Causes More Renal Toxicity\nb) Reduces Cerebral Metabolic Rate\nc) Risk of Malignant Hyperthermia is high\nd) Inhibits Hypoxic Pulmonary Vasconstriction"}], "sampled": ["b) Reduces Cerebral Metabolic Rate"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:23.930432+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 205, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.207", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "b) Reduces Cerebral Metabolic Rate", "picked": "b) Reduces Cerebral Metabolic Rate", "sampled": "b) Reduces Cerebral Metabolic Rate", "options": ["b) Reduces Cerebral Metabolic Rate"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:23.930502+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 206, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.38", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Dental\n\nIf solid line represent the rigid height, then the following diagram with excessive inter arch space is classified in?\n\na) Class - 1\nb) Class - 2\nc) Class - 3\nd) Class - 4"}], "sampled": ["a) Class - 1"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:23.946035+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 207, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.38", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "b) Class - 2", "picked": null, "sampled": "a) Class - 1", "options": ["b) Class - 2"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:23.946075+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 208, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.115", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Biochemistry\n\nWhich of the following vitamin reduces the risk of insulin resistance, obesity, and the metabolic syndrome?\n\na) Vitamin A\nb) Vitamin C\nc) Vitamin D\nd) Vitamin B12"}], "sampled": ["c) Vitamin D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:23.953258+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 209, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.115", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "c) Vitamin D", "picked": "c) Vitamin D", "sampled": "c) Vitamin D", "options": ["c) Vitamin D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:23.953301+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 210, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.91", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: ENT\n\nIn caloric test, cold water stimulation causes movement of eye -\n\na) Some side\nb) Opposite side\nc) Up\nd) Do\\vn"}], "sampled": ["b) Opposite side"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:24.037298+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 211, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.91", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "b) Opposite side", "picked": "b) Opposite side", "sampled": "b) Opposite side", "options": ["b) Opposite side"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:24.037342+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 212, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.254", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Ophthalmology\n\nAll are causes of white-dot syndrome except:\n\na) Fuch's heterochromic uveitis\nb) VKH syndrome\nc) HIV retinopathy\nd) Sympathetic ophthalmitis"}], "sampled": ["a) Fuch's heterochromic uveitis"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:24.056655+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 213, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.254", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "d) Sympathetic ophthalmitis", "picked": null, "sampled": "a) Fuch's heterochromic uveitis", "options": ["d) Sympathetic ophthalmitis"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:24.056699+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 214, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.232", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Biochemistry\n\nSpecific poison for succinate dehydrogenase is ?\n\na) Cyanide\nb) Malonate\nc) Arsenite\nd) Fluoride"}], "sampled": ["b) Malonate"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:24.096145+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 215, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.232", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "b) Malonate", "picked": "b) Malonate", "sampled": "b) Malonate", "options": ["b) Malonate"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:24.096181+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 216, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.54", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Pathology\n\nSplenomegaly may be a feature of: March 2013\n\na) Megaloblastic anemia\nb) Sickle cell anemia\nc) Thalassemia\nd) G6PD deficiency"}], "sampled": ["a) Megaloblastic anemia"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:24.199119+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 217, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.54", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "b) Sickle cell anemia", "picked": null, "sampled": "a) Megaloblastic anemia", "options": ["b) Sickle cell anemia"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:24.199198+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 218, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.157", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Gynaecology & Obstetrics\n\nSho structured primi gravida has height less then\n\na) 140 cm\nb) 145 cm\nc) 150 cm\nd) 135 cm"}], "sampled": ["There is a typo in the question and it is not clear what is being asked. Please provide a clear and accurate question."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:24.380038+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 219, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.157", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "a) 140 cm", "picked": null, "sampled": "There is a typo in the question and it is not clear what is being asked. Please provide a clear and accurate question.", "options": ["a) 140 cm"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:24.400492+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 220, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.173", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Biochemistry\n\nIn a patient with a type of familial dyslipidemias he presented with palmar Xanthomas and he ias at increased risk of atherosclerosis and CAD.In Lipid profile there was elevation of triacylglycerols and cholesterol.And the IDL and chylomicrons were elevated.What is the pathophysiology of the condition?\n\na) LDL deficiency\nb) VLDL overproduction\nc) Apo C-2 deficiency\nd) Apo E deficiency"}], "sampled": ["b) VLDL overproduction"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:24.550875+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 221, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.173", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "d) Apo E deficiency", "picked": null, "sampled": "b) VLDL overproduction", "options": ["d) Apo E deficiency"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:24.550934+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 222, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.186", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Social & Preventive Medicine\n\nChemoprophylaxis is indicated for all except-\n\na) Typhoid\nb) Meningococcal meningitis\nc) Cholera\nd) Plague"}], "sampled": ["d) Plague"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:24.599802+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 223, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.186", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "a) Typhoid", "picked": null, "sampled": "d) Plague", "options": ["a) Typhoid"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:24.599848+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 224, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.278", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Pharmacology\n\nPimozide belongs to class of:\n\na) Thiothixanthene\nb) Phenothiazine\nc) Butyrophenone\nd) Diphenyl butyl piperidine"}], "sampled": ["c) Butyrophenone"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:24.665576+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 225, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.278", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "d) Diphenyl butyl piperidine", "picked": null, "sampled": "c) Butyrophenone", "options": ["d) Diphenyl butyl piperidine"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:24.665616+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 226, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.92", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Social & Preventive Medicine\n\nWhich of the following is not false about annual risk of TB\n\na) ARI of 1% = 75 new cases\nb) Current ARI in India is 1.7%\nc) It is represents new cases of TB\nd) It is assessed by tuberculin conversion in previously non-vaccinated children"}], "sampled": ["d) It is assessed by tuberculin conversion in previously non-vaccinated children"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:24.798226+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 227, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.92", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "d) It is assessed by tuberculin conversion in previously non-vaccinated children", "picked": "d) It is assessed by tuberculin conversion in previously non-vaccinated children", "sampled": "d) It is assessed by tuberculin conversion in previously non-vaccinated children", "options": ["d) It is assessed by tuberculin conversion in previously non-vaccinated children"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:24.798266+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 228, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.292", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Physiology\n\nMost sensitive nerve fiber to hypoxia\n\na) A\nb) B\nc) C\nd) All are equally sensitive"}], "sampled": ["a) A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:24.881599+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 229, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.292", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "b) B", "picked": null, "sampled": "a) A", "options": ["b) B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:24.881641+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 230, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.121", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Dental\n\nSecondary retention for a removable partial denture is provided by\n\na) The indirect retainer\nb) The direct retainer\nc) Intimate contact between the denture bases and the underlying tissues\nd) Direct and indirect retainers"}], "sampled": ["d) Direct and indirect retainers."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:24.957238+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 231, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.121", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "c) Intimate contact between the denture bases and the underlying tissues", "picked": null, "sampled": "d) Direct and indirect retainers.", "options": ["c) Intimate contact between the denture bases and the underlying tissues"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:24.957278+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 232, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.250", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Skin\n\nA 7 years old boy presented with painful boggy swelling of scalp, multiple sinuses with purulent discharge, easily pluckable hairs and lymph nodes enlarged in occipital region. Which one of the following would be most helpful for diagnostic evaluation?\n\na) Bacterial culture\nb) Biopsy\nc) KOH mount\nd) Patch test"}], "sampled": ["b) Biopsy"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:25.185703+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 233, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.250", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "c) KOH mount", "picked": null, "sampled": "b) Biopsy", "options": ["c) KOH mount"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:25.185763+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 234, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.57", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Biochemistry\n\nAll of the following could include the mechanism or function of oxigenases, EXCEPT:\n\na) Incorporate 2 atoms of oxygen\nb) Incorporate 1 atom of oxygen\nc) Required for hydroxylation of steroids\nd) Required for carboxylation of drugs"}], "sampled": ["b) Incorporate 1 atom of oxygen"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:25.229493+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 235, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.57", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "d) Required for carboxylation of drugs", "picked": null, "sampled": "b) Incorporate 1 atom of oxygen", "options": ["d) Required for carboxylation of drugs"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:25.229535+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 236, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.266", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Surgery\n\nIliac crest involvement is common in which condition: March 2007\n\na) Ankylosing spondylitis\nb) Rheumatoid ahritis\nc) Reiter's syndrome\nd) Osteoahritis"}], "sampled": ["a) Ankylosing spondylitis"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:25.240965+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 237, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.266", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) Ankylosing spondylitis", "picked": "a) Ankylosing spondylitis", "sampled": "a) Ankylosing spondylitis", "options": ["a) Ankylosing spondylitis"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:25.241002+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 238, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.155", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Pediatrics\n\nAsymmetric tonic neck reflex (ATNR) disappears at ______\n\na) 6 months\nb) 5 months\nc) 9 months\nd) 8 months"}], "sampled": ["a) 6 months"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:25.273592+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 239, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.155", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) 6 months", "picked": "a) 6 months", "sampled": "a) 6 months", "options": ["a) 6 months"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:25.273623+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 240, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.245", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Medicine\n\nAll of the following are ACTH independent Cushing syndrome except :\n\na) Pituitary adenoma\nb) Adrenal hyperplasia\nc) Adrenocoical carcinoma\nd) McCune Albright Syndrome"}], "sampled": ["c) Adrenocortical carcinoma"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:25.413465+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 241, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.245", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "a) Pituitary adenoma", "picked": null, "sampled": "c) Adrenocortical carcinoma", "options": ["a) Pituitary adenoma"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:25.413510+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 242, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.179", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Forensic Medicine\n\nFollowing death of a person, what happens to potassium level in the vitreous.\n\na) Potassium level falls\nb) Potassium level increases\nc) Remains unchanged\nd) It depends on cause of death"}], "sampled": ["b) Potassium level increases."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:25.512309+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 243, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.179", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "b) Potassium level increases", "picked": "b) Potassium level increases", "sampled": "b) Potassium level increases.", "options": ["b) Potassium level increases"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:25.512362+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 244, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.17", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Social & Preventive Medicine\n\nFor a positively skewed curve which measure of central tendency is largest\n\na) Mean\nb) Mode\nc) Median\nd) All are equal"}], "sampled": ["a) Mean"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:25.520973+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 245, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.17", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) Mean", "picked": "a) Mean", "sampled": "a) Mean", "options": ["a) Mean"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:25.521020+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 246, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.75", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Pediatrics\n\nAll of the following are causes of congenital blindness Except\n\na) Toxoplasmosis\nb) Congenital rubella\nc) Vitamin A deficiency\nd) Cataract"}], "sampled": ["c) Vitamin A deficiency"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:25.547310+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 247, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.75", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "c) Vitamin A deficiency", "picked": "c) Vitamin A deficiency", "sampled": "c) Vitamin A deficiency", "options": ["c) Vitamin A deficiency"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:25.547387+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 248, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.294", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Pharmacology\n\nMetoprolol is preferred over Propranolol as it: September 2010\n\na) Is more potent in blocking beta-1 receptors\nb) Is more potent in blocking beta-2 receptors\nc) Is more effective in suppressing essential tremors\nd) Impairs exercise capacity"}], "sampled": ["a) Is more potent in blocking beta-1 receptors"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:25.773892+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 249, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.294", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) Is more potent in blocking beta-1 receptors", "picked": "a) Is more potent in blocking beta-1 receptors", "sampled": "a) Is more potent in blocking beta-1 receptors", "options": ["a) Is more potent in blocking beta-1 receptors"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:25.773940+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 250, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.212", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Medicine\n\nOne of the constituents of the commonly used metered dose inhalers in bronchial asthma which is an air pollutant & dangerous to earth's stratosphere is -\n\na) Flurocarbons\nb) Salbutamol\nc) Ozone\nd) Oxygen"}], "sampled": ["a) Flurocarbons"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:25.845760+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 251, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.212", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) Flurocarbons", "picked": "a) Flurocarbons", "sampled": "a) Flurocarbons", "options": ["a) Flurocarbons"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:25.845792+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 252, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.201", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Unknown\n\nAntibodies associated with GTCS in SLE :\n\na) Anti neuronal ab\nb) Anti-Ro ab\nc) Anti-Sm ab\nd) None"}], "sampled": ["a) Anti neuronal ab"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:26.153056+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 253, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.201", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) Anti neuronal ab", "picked": "a) Anti neuronal ab", "sampled": "a) Anti neuronal ab", "options": ["a) Anti neuronal ab"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:26.153105+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 254, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.74", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Surgery\n\nAn Isograft indicates transfer of tissues between -\n\na) Unrelated donors\nb) Related donors\nc) Monozygotic twins\nd) From the same individual"}], "sampled": ["c) Monozygotic twins"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:26.172407+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 255, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.74", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "c) Monozygotic twins", "picked": "c) Monozygotic twins", "sampled": "c) Monozygotic twins", "options": ["c) Monozygotic twins"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:26.172448+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 256, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.42", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Anatomy\n\nDuring Sx for meningioma, the left paracentral lobule was injured. It would lead to paresis of\n\na) Rt. Leg and perineus\nb) Left face\nc) Right face\nd) Right shoulder & trunk"}], "sampled": ["a) Rt. Leg and perineus"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:26.187409+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 257, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.42", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) Rt. Leg and perineus", "picked": "a) Rt. Leg and perineus", "sampled": "a) Rt. Leg and perineus", "options": ["a) Rt. Leg and perineus"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:26.187460+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 258, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.102", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Surgery\n\nPotter syndrome is not assoiated with\n\na) Bilateral renal agenesis\nb) Bilateral multicystic kidney disease\nc) oligohydromnios\nd) Polyhydromnios"}], "sampled": ["d) Polyhydromnios"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:26.194956+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 259, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.102", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "a) Bilateral renal agenesis", "picked": null, "sampled": "d) Polyhydromnios", "options": ["a) Bilateral renal agenesis"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:26.194997+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 260, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.30", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Anaesthesia\n\nRisk factors associated with post-operative nausea and vomiting following strabismus surgery are all except -\n\na) Age < 3years\nb) Duration of anesthesia > 30 mins\nc) Personal or family history of post - op nausea and vomiting\nd) Personal or family history of motion sickness"}], "sampled": ["Answer: a) Age < 3 years"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:26.234991+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 261, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.30", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "a) Age < 3years", "picked": null, "sampled": "Answer: a) Age < 3 years", "options": ["a) Age < 3years"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:26.235025+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 262, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.37", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Orthopaedics\n\nWhat change will be seen in vertebral column in ochronosis-\n\na) Calcification of disc\nb) Bamboo spine\nc) Increased disc space\nd) None"}], "sampled": ["b) Bamboo spine"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:26.371501+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 263, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.37", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "a) Calcification of disc", "picked": null, "sampled": "b) Bamboo spine", "options": ["a) Calcification of disc"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:26.371549+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 264, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.32", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Orthopaedics\n\nAnterolateral ahroscopy of knee is for:\n\na) To see patellofemoral aiculation\nb) To see the posterior cruciate ligament\nc) To see the anterior poion of lateral meniscus\nd) To see the periphery of the posterior horn of medial meniscus"}], "sampled": ["c) To see the anterior portion of lateral meniscus."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:26.443162+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 265, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.32", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "a) To see patellofemoral aiculation", "picked": null, "sampled": "c) To see the anterior portion of lateral meniscus.", "options": ["a) To see patellofemoral aiculation"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:26.443209+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 266, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.94", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Skin\n\nIgA deposits on skin biopsy\n\na) Henoch Schouleiln puspura\nb) Giant cell aeritis\nc) Microscopic polyangitis\nd) Wegener's granulomatosis"}], "sampled": ["a) Henoch Schouleiln puspura"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:26.624327+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 267, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.94", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) Henoch Schouleiln puspura", "picked": "a) Henoch Schouleiln puspura", "sampled": "a) Henoch Schouleiln puspura", "options": ["a) Henoch Schouleiln puspura"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:26.624385+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 268, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.132", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Anatomy\n\nCongestive hea failure in an infant is characterized by all except\n\na) Pedal edema\nb) Tachypnea\nc) Sweating\nd) Poor weight gain"}], "sampled": ["c) Sweating"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:26.786825+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 269, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.132", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "a) Pedal edema", "picked": null, "sampled": "c) Sweating", "options": ["a) Pedal edema"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:26.786892+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 270, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.60", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Social & Preventive Medicine\n\nPrevalence is a:\n\na) Rate\nb) Ratio\nc) Propoion\nd) None of the above"}], "sampled": ["a) Rate"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:26.862154+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 271, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.60", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "c) Propoion", "picked": null, "sampled": "a) Rate", "options": ["c) Propoion"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:26.862202+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 272, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.78", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Ophthalmology\n\nWhich of the following is true statement regarding human eye\n\na) Cornea cut off wavelength upto 400 nm\nb) Normal eye medium will permit wavelength of 400- 700 nm\nc) Even after cataract surgery UV rays are not penetrated\nd) Lens will not reflect light"}], "sampled": ["b) Normal eye medium will permit wavelength of 400- 700 nm"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:26.918853+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 273, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.78", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "b) Normal eye medium will permit wavelength of 400- 700 nm", "picked": "b) Normal eye medium will permit wavelength of 400- 700 nm", "sampled": "b) Normal eye medium will permit wavelength of 400- 700 nm", "options": ["b) Normal eye medium will permit wavelength of 400- 700 nm"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:26.918899+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 274, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.20", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Surgery\n\nTesticular artery usually arises from\n\na) Abdominal aorta below renal artery\nb) Renal artery\nc) Internal iliac artery\nd) Ext iliac artery"}], "sampled": ["a) Abdominal aorta below renal artery"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:27.204637+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 275, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.20", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) Abdominal aorta below renal artery", "picked": "a) Abdominal aorta below renal artery", "sampled": "a) Abdominal aorta below renal artery", "options": ["a) Abdominal aorta below renal artery"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:27.204700+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 276, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.14", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Surgery\n\nA 60 yr old chronic smoker presents with painless gross hematuria of 1 day duration. Investigation of choice to know the cause of hematuria\n\na) USG\nb) X-ray KUB\nc) Urine routine\nd) Urine microscopy for malignant cytology cells"}], "sampled": ["d) Urine microscopy for malignant cytology cells"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:27.212051+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 277, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.14", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "d) Urine microscopy for malignant cytology cells", "picked": "d) Urine microscopy for malignant cytology cells", "sampled": "d) Urine microscopy for malignant cytology cells", "options": ["d) Urine microscopy for malignant cytology cells"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:27.212090+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 278, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.238", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Radiology\n\nCarotid artery stenosis screening invivo choice is -\n\na) USG\nb) CT\nc) MRI\nd) Doppler"}], "sampled": ["d) Doppler"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:27.291310+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 279, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.238", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "d) Doppler", "picked": "d) Doppler", "sampled": "d) Doppler", "options": ["d) Doppler"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:27.291358+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 280, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.167", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Biochemistry\n\nWhich of the following vitamin enhances intestinal absorption of calcium?\n\na) Vitamin D\nb) Vitamin K\nc) Vitamin B1\nd) Vitamin B2"}], "sampled": ["a) Vitamin D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:27.313999+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 281, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.167", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) Vitamin D", "picked": "a) Vitamin D", "sampled": "a) Vitamin D", "options": ["a) Vitamin D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:27.314046+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 282, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.236", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Biochemistry\n\nInherited hyperammonemia is a result of deficiency of which enzyme of Krebs-Henseleit urea cycle?\n\na) Malate dehydrogenase\nb) Isocitrate dehydrogenase\nc) N-acetyl glutamate synthetase\nd) Succinate dehydrogenase"}], "sampled": ["c) N-acetyl glutamate synthetase"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:27.390863+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 283, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.236", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "c) N-acetyl glutamate synthetase", "picked": "c) N-acetyl glutamate synthetase", "sampled": "c) N-acetyl glutamate synthetase", "options": ["c) N-acetyl glutamate synthetase"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:27.390904+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 284, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.255", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Dental\n\nMaximum flow of Type1 inlay wax at 45degree\n\na) 2%\nb) 3%\nc) 10%\nd) 70%"}], "sampled": ["b) 3%"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:27.505843+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 285, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.255", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "d) 70%", "picked": null, "sampled": "b) 3%", "options": ["d) 70%"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:27.505903+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 286, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.215", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Pediatrics\n\nTrue about polio:\n\na) Paralytic polio is most common\nb) Spastic paralysis seen\nc) IM injections and increased muscular activity lead to increased paralysis\nd) Polio drops in pulse polio immunisation given only in <3 years old children"}], "sampled": ["d) Polio drops in pulse polio immunisation given only in <3 years old children"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:27.531685+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 287, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.215", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "c) IM injections and increased muscular activity lead to increased paralysis", "picked": null, "sampled": "d) Polio drops in pulse polio immunisation given only in <3 years old children", "options": ["c) IM injections and increased muscular activity lead to increased paralysis"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:27.531724+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 288, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.89", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Microbiology\n\nTest for diagnosis of pyogenic meningitis is?\n\na) Widal\nb) CSF PCR\nc) CSF examination\nd) PET scan"}], "sampled": ["c) CSF examination"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:27.804790+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 289, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.89", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "c) CSF examination", "picked": "c) CSF examination", "sampled": "c) CSF examination", "options": ["c) CSF examination"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:27.804828+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 290, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.106", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Anatomy\n\nStomach is derived from ?\n\na) Foregut\nb) Midgut\nc) Hindgut\nd) Allantois"}], "sampled": ["a) Foregut"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:27.818978+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 291, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.106", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) Foregut", "picked": "a) Foregut", "sampled": "a) Foregut", "options": ["a) Foregut"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:27.819014+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 292, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.41", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Anatomy\n\nAll of the following are features of Lymph node histology except\n\na) Subcapsular sinus present\nb) Both Efferent and Afferent are present\nc) Coex and Medulla are present\nd) Red pulp and White pulp are present"}], "sampled": ["d) Red pulp and White pulp are present"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:27.902091+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 293, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.41", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "d) Red pulp and White pulp are present", "picked": "d) Red pulp and White pulp are present", "sampled": "d) Red pulp and White pulp are present", "options": ["d) Red pulp and White pulp are present"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:27.902129+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 294, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.222", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Social & Preventive Medicine\n\nYou are the medical officer in charge of the immunisation programme at a sub-centre and you are informed by the local ASHA worker that one of the children who was immunised has has been dizzy. On fuher investigation it was confirmed that the symptoms were due to anxiety of pain of the injection and not as a result of the vaccine. You would consider the incidence as:\n\na) Vaccine reaction\nb) Injection reaction\nc) Programme error\nd) Coincidental"}], "sampled": ["d) Coincidental"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:27.907796+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 295, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.222", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "b) Injection reaction", "picked": null, "sampled": "d) Coincidental", "options": ["b) Injection reaction"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:27.907829+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 296, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.143", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Pathology\n\nEarliest lesion seen in atherosclerosis is:\n\na) Fatty streaks\nb) Intimal thickening\nc) Fibrinoid necrosis\nd) Plaque"}], "sampled": ["a) Fatty streaks"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:27.916392+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 297, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.143", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) Fatty streaks", "picked": "a) Fatty streaks", "sampled": "a) Fatty streaks", "options": ["a) Fatty streaks"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:27.916440+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 298, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.234", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Anaesthesia\n\nPost operative muscle ache is caused by\n\na) d-TC\nb) Suxamethonium\nc) Gallamine\nd) Pancuronium"}], "sampled": ["a) d-TC"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:28.023033+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 299, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.234", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "b) Suxamethonium", "picked": null, "sampled": "a) d-TC", "options": ["b) Suxamethonium"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:28.023081+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 300, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.120", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Radiology\n\nA 50 year old female patient complains of difficulty in swallowing. Patient gives h/o multiple diagnostic CT-scans of the head and neck region. This patient may be predominantly susceptible to which of the following?\n\na) Medullary thyroid carcinoma\nb) Follicular thyroid carcinoma\nc) Anaplastic thyroid carcinoma\nd) Papillary thyroid carcinoma"}], "sampled": ["d) Papillary thyroid carcinoma"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:28.119509+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 301, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.120", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "d) Papillary thyroid carcinoma", "picked": "d) Papillary thyroid carcinoma", "sampled": "d) Papillary thyroid carcinoma", "options": ["d) Papillary thyroid carcinoma"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:28.119594+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 302, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.224", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Psychiatry\n\nPostponing paying attention of conscious impulse or conflict is a mature defence mechanism known as -\n\na) Sublimation\nb) Suppression\nc) Humor\nd) Anticipation"}], "sampled": ["b) Suppression"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:28.253053+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 303, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.224", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "b) Suppression", "picked": "b) Suppression", "sampled": "b) Suppression", "options": ["b) Suppression"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:28.253127+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 304, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.36", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Pediatrics\n\nFor TOF management in antenatal period includes ?\n\na) Balloon valvotomy\nb) Open hea surgery\nc) Karyotyping\nd) Aspirin"}], "sampled": ["The given question is incomplete. It does not provide the options for the answer. Please provide the complete question with options."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:28.369255+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 305, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.36", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "c) Karyotyping", "picked": null, "sampled": "The given question is incomplete. It does not provide the options for the answer. Please provide the complete question with options.", "options": ["c) Karyotyping"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:28.369299+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 306, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.7", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Surgery\n\nPer rectum examination is not a useful test for diagnosis of\n\na) Anal fissure\nb) Hemorrhoid\nc) Pilonidal sinus\nd) Rectal ulcer"}], "sampled": ["c) Pilonidal sinus"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:28.386853+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 307, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.7", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "c) Pilonidal sinus", "picked": "c) Pilonidal sinus", "sampled": "c) Pilonidal sinus", "options": ["c) Pilonidal sinus"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:28.386963+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 308, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.82", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Social & Preventive Medicine\n\nOne standard detion in normal standard curev includes value-\n\na) 50%\nb) 68%\nc) 95%\nd) 100%"}], "sampled": ["c) 95%"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:28.455813+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 309, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.82", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "b) 68%", "picked": null, "sampled": "c) 95%", "options": ["b) 68%"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:28.455874+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 310, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.191", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Pharmacology\n\nThe drug used in petit mal seizures and has a narrow spectrum of antiepileptic activity is\n\na) Lamotrigine\nb) Ethosuximide\nc) Phenytoin\nd) Primidone"}], "sampled": ["b) Ethosuximide"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:28.518196+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 311, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.191", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "b) Ethosuximide", "picked": "b) Ethosuximide", "sampled": "b) Ethosuximide", "options": ["b) Ethosuximide"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:28.518243+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 312, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.202", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: ENT\n\nTonsillar fossa is bounded anteriorly by\n\na) Pharyngobasilar fascia\nb) Palatopharyngeal fold\nc) Buccopharyngeal fascia\nd) Palatoglossal fold"}], "sampled": ["b) Palatopharyngeal fold"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:28.860284+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 313, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.202", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "d) Palatoglossal fold", "picked": null, "sampled": "b) Palatopharyngeal fold", "options": ["d) Palatoglossal fold"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:28.860334+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 314, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.218", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Medicine\n\nMycosis fungoides which is not true:\n\na) It is the most common form of cutaneous lymphoma.\nb) Pautriers microabscess.\nc) Indolent course and easily amenable to treatment.\nd) Erythroderma seen and spreads to peripheral."}], "sampled": ["c) Indolent course and easily amenable to treatment."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:28.940125+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 315, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.218", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "c) Indolent course and easily amenable to treatment.", "picked": "c) Indolent course and easily amenable to treatment.", "sampled": "c) Indolent course and easily amenable to treatment.", "options": ["c) Indolent course and easily amenable to treatment."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:28.940184+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 316, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.110", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Medicine\n\nWhich of the following is a poor prognostic factor for childhood ALL.\n\na) Total Leukocyte count 4000-100,000\nb) Age < 2 years\nc) Testicular involvement\nd) Blasts in peripheral smear"}], "sampled": ["b) Age < 2 years"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:28.985159+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 317, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.110", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "c) Testicular involvement", "picked": null, "sampled": "b) Age < 2 years", "options": ["c) Testicular involvement"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:28.985199+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 318, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.241", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Medicine\n\nFeatures of neurogenic shock are\n\na) ↑Peripheral resistance ↓ cardiac output\nb) ↑ Venous return ↑ cardiac output\nc) ↓Peripheral resistence↓cardiac output\nd) Venoconstriction ↓cardiac output"}], "sampled": ["c) ↓Peripheral resistance ↓cardiac output"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:29.032368+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 319, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.241", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "c) ↓Peripheral resistence↓cardiac output", "picked": null, "sampled": "c) ↓Peripheral resistance ↓cardiac output", "options": ["c) ↓Peripheral resistence↓cardiac output"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:29.032401+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 320, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.242", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Forensic Medicine\n\nPalm of one hand is placed horizontally across the mouth and nostrils in\n\na) Manual strangulation\nb) Palmar strangulation\nc) Garrotting\nd) Mugging"}], "sampled": ["b) Palmar strangulation"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:29.058846+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 321, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.242", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "b) Palmar strangulation", "picked": "b) Palmar strangulation", "sampled": "b) Palmar strangulation", "options": ["b) Palmar strangulation"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:29.058893+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 322, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.176", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Surgery\n\nCarcinoma of the prostate arise from -\n\na) Central zone\nb) Peripheral zone\nc) Transitional zone\nd) Periurethral zone"}], "sampled": ["b) Peripheral zone"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:29.102873+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 323, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.176", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "b) Peripheral zone", "picked": "b) Peripheral zone", "sampled": "b) Peripheral zone", "options": ["b) Peripheral zone"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:29.102908+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 324, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.187", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Microbiology\n\nIn pontaic fever, which antigen is seen in urine?\n\na) Lipopolysaccharide-1\nb) Lipopolysaccharide-2\nc) Lipopolysaccharide-4\nd) Lipopolysaccharide-6"}], "sampled": ["a) Lipopolysaccharide-1"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:29.171745+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 325, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.187", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) Lipopolysaccharide-1", "picked": "a) Lipopolysaccharide-1", "sampled": "a) Lipopolysaccharide-1", "options": ["a) Lipopolysaccharide-1"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:29.171808+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 326, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.182", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Surgery\n\nA young lady with symptoms of hypehyroidism with elevated T4 and TSH levels. On examination, patient was not experiencing Tachycardia or excessive sweating.Fuher examination reveals bitemporal hemianopia. Next step of management\n\na) Sta beta blockers immediately\nb) Conservative management sufficient\nc) Sta antithyroid drugs and wait for symptoms to resolve.\nd) Sta antithyroid drugs and do urgent MRI"}], "sampled": ["d) Sta antithyroid drugs and do urgent MRI."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:29.225947+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 327, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.182", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "d) Sta antithyroid drugs and do urgent MRI", "picked": "d) Sta antithyroid drugs and do urgent MRI", "sampled": "d) Sta antithyroid drugs and do urgent MRI.", "options": ["d) Sta antithyroid drugs and do urgent MRI"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:29.225987+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 328, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.296", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Ophthalmology\n\nMost serious complication seen in other eye after traumatic injury to one eye: March 2005, September 2008\n\na) Subconjunctival hemorrhage\nb) Corneal edema\nc) Sympathetic ophthalmia\nd) Sudden loss of vision"}], "sampled": ["c) Sympathetic ophthalmia"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:29.474461+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 329, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.296", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "c) Sympathetic ophthalmia", "picked": "c) Sympathetic ophthalmia", "sampled": "c) Sympathetic ophthalmia", "options": ["c) Sympathetic ophthalmia"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:29.474503+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 330, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.27", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: ENT\n\nTreatment of choice in traumatic facial nerve injury is:\n\na) Facial sling\nb) Facial nerve repair\nc) Conservative management\nd) Systemic corticosteroids"}], "sampled": ["b) Facial nerve repair"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:29.650500+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 331, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.27", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "b) Facial nerve repair", "picked": "b) Facial nerve repair", "sampled": "b) Facial nerve repair", "options": ["b) Facial nerve repair"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:29.650563+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 332, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.280", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Forensic Medicine\n\nFollowing poisoning retards putrefaction: NEET 13\n\na) Aluminium phosphide\nb) Lead\nc) Arsenic\nd) Copper"}], "sampled": ["c) Arsenic"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:29.660012+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 333, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.280", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "c) Arsenic", "picked": "c) Arsenic", "sampled": "c) Arsenic", "options": ["c) Arsenic"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:29.660054+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 334, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.16", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Anatomy\n\nHyper viscosity is seen in\n\na) Cryoglobulinemia\nb) Multiple myeloma\nc) MGUS\nd) Lymphoma"}], "sampled": ["a) Cryoglobulinemia"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:29.672239+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 335, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.16", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) Cryoglobulinemia", "picked": "a) Cryoglobulinemia", "sampled": "a) Cryoglobulinemia", "options": ["a) Cryoglobulinemia"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:29.672286+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 336, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.237", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Forensic Medicine\n\nPunishment for infanticide comes under -\n\na) IPC102\nb) IPC324\nc) IPC302\nd) IPC300"}], "sampled": ["a) IPC102"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:29.747641+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 337, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.237", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "c) IPC302", "picked": null, "sampled": "a) IPC102", "options": ["c) IPC302"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:29.747692+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 338, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.162", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Surgery\n\nAn athelete presented with red coloured urine after 2 days of history of severe exeion. The most probable cause is?\n\na) Hemoglobinuria\nb) Hemosiderinuria\nc) Hematuria\nd) Myoglobinuria"}], "sampled": ["d) Myoglobinuria"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:29.799938+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 339, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.162", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "d) Myoglobinuria", "picked": "d) Myoglobinuria", "sampled": "d) Myoglobinuria", "options": ["d) Myoglobinuria"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:29.800004+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 340, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.235", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Surgery\n\nBlood stained sputum may be the only symptom in?\n\na) Bronchiectasis\nb) Carcinoma bronchus\nc) Adenoma bronchus\nd) Pulmonary T.B."}], "sampled": ["b) Carcinoma bronchus"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:29.833479+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 341, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.235", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "c) Adenoma bronchus", "picked": null, "sampled": "b) Carcinoma bronchus", "options": ["c) Adenoma bronchus"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:29.833527+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 342, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.158", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Medicine\n\nWhich of the following is the most specific and sensitive screening test for renovascular hypeension?\n\na) HRCT\nb) CT Angiography\nc) Captopril enhanced radionucleotide scan\nd) Doppler ultrasound of renal aeries"}], "sampled": ["c) Captopril enhanced radionucleotide scan"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:29.849154+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 343, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.158", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "b) CT Angiography", "picked": null, "sampled": "c) Captopril enhanced radionucleotide scan", "options": ["b) CT Angiography"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:29.849188+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 344, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.285", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Anatomy\n\nLines of Blaschko&;s are along\n\na) Lymphatics\nb) Nervs\nc) Developmental\nd) Blood vessels"}], "sampled": ["c) Developmental"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:30.102992+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 345, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.285", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "c) Developmental", "picked": "c) Developmental", "sampled": "c) Developmental", "options": ["c) Developmental"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:30.103054+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 346, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.249", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Dental\n\nWhich of the following is true about calcification of teeth?\n\na) Calcification of primary teeth is almost complete at time of birth\nb) Calcification of all primary teeth and few permanent teeth complete at birth\nc) Calcification of all permanent teeth complete at birt\nd) Calcification of primary teeth starts around birth"}], "sampled": ["d) Calcification of primary teeth starts around birth."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:30.298722+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 347, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.249", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "a) Calcification of primary teeth is almost complete at time of birth", "picked": null, "sampled": "d) Calcification of primary teeth starts around birth.", "options": ["a) Calcification of primary teeth is almost complete at time of birth"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:30.298783+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 348, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.5", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Social & Preventive Medicine\n\nScrub typhus is transmitted by: September 2004\n\na) Louse\nb) Tick\nc) Mite\nd) Milk"}], "sampled": ["c) Mite"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:30.366170+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 349, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.5", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "c) Mite", "picked": "c) Mite", "sampled": "c) Mite", "options": ["c) Mite"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:30.366231+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 350, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.49", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Social & Preventive Medicine\n\nMinimum level of iodine iodized salt reaching the consumer level according to iodine programme should be:-\n\na) 5 ppm\nb) 30 ppm\nc) 15 ppm\nd) 20 ppm"}], "sampled": ["c) 15 ppm"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:30.420356+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 351, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.49", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "c) 15 ppm", "picked": "c) 15 ppm", "sampled": "c) 15 ppm", "options": ["c) 15 ppm"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:30.420395+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 352, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.233", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Social & Preventive Medicine\n\nMost common widespread zoonotic disease in the world is -\n\na) Rabies\nb) Leptospirosis\nc) Brucella\nd) Anthrax"}], "sampled": ["b) Leptospirosis"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:30.438166+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 353, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.233", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "b) Leptospirosis", "picked": "b) Leptospirosis", "sampled": "b) Leptospirosis", "options": ["b) Leptospirosis"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:30.438210+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 354, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.248", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Medicine\n\nAll of the following are features of Devic's syndrome (neuromyelitis optica), except?\n\na) Separate attacks of acute optic neuritis and myelitis\nb) Optic neuritis is either unilateral or bilateral\nc) Brain MRI is typically normal\nd) It has a fulminant demyelinating process and progress to death in 1-2 year"}], "sampled": ["c) Brain MRI is typically normal."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:30.680814+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 355, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.248", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "d) It has a fulminant demyelinating process and progress to death in 1-2 year", "picked": null, "sampled": "c) Brain MRI is typically normal.", "options": ["d) It has a fulminant demyelinating process and progress to death in 1-2 year"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:30.680864+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 356, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.204", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Physiology\n\nShock causes:\n\na) Stagnant hypoxia\nb) Anemic hypoxia\nc) Hypoxic hypoxia\nd) Histotoxic hypoxia"}], "sampled": ["a) Stagnant hypoxia"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:30.686924+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 357, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.204", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) Stagnant hypoxia", "picked": "a) Stagnant hypoxia", "sampled": "a) Stagnant hypoxia", "options": ["a) Stagnant hypoxia"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:30.686968+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 358, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.65", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Anatomy\n\nFalse about obstructive jaundice\n\na) Unconjugated bilirubin\nb) Pruritus\nc) Pale stools\nd) Icterus"}], "sampled": ["a) Unconjugated bilirubin"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:30.758170+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 359, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.65", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) Unconjugated bilirubin", "picked": "a) Unconjugated bilirubin", "sampled": "a) Unconjugated bilirubin", "options": ["a) Unconjugated bilirubin"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:30.758226+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 360, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.34", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Radiology\n\n25 year old patient Suspected to have a pneumoperitoneum. Patient is unable to stand. Best x-ray view is\n\na) Left lateral decubitus view\nb) Right lateral decubitus view\nc) Supine\nd) Prone"}], "sampled": ["b) Right lateral decubitus view"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:30.815557+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 361, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.34", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "a) Left lateral decubitus view", "picked": null, "sampled": "b) Right lateral decubitus view", "options": ["a) Left lateral decubitus view"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:30.815598+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 362, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.96", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Physiology\n\nWhich of the following hormonal activity is expected immediately prior to Ovulation?\n\na) LH surge\nb) FSH surge\nc) Progestrone surge\nd) Estrogen surge"}], "sampled": ["a) LH surge"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:30.929162+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 363, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.96", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) LH surge", "picked": "a) LH surge", "sampled": "a) LH surge", "options": ["a) LH surge"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:30.929220+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 364, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.118", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Radiology\n\nAdder Head\" appearance is found in:\n\na) X-ray\nb) USG\nc) IVP\nd) CT"}], "sampled": ["d) CT"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:31.021725+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 365, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.118", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "c) IVP", "picked": null, "sampled": "d) CT", "options": ["c) IVP"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:31.021791+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 366, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.113", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Gynaecology & Obstetrics\n\nSavita is 32 weeks pregnant presents in causality and diagnosed as a case of APH. Vitals are unstable with BP 80/60 which of the following is next step in M/n\n\na) Careful observation\nb) Blood transfusion\nc) Medical induction of labour\nd) Immediate cesarean section"}], "sampled": ["d) Immediate cesarean section"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:31.084197+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 367, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.113", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "b) Blood transfusion", "picked": null, "sampled": "d) Immediate cesarean section", "options": ["b) Blood transfusion"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:31.084235+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 368, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.2", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Surgery\n\nAll of the following are surgical options for morbid obesity except -\n\na) Adjustable gastric banding\nb) Biliopancreatic diversion\nc) Duodenal Switch\nd) Roux en Y Duodenal By pass"}], "sampled": ["b) Biliopancreatic diversion"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:31.135455+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 369, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.2", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "d) Roux en Y Duodenal By pass", "picked": null, "sampled": "b) Biliopancreatic diversion", "options": ["d) Roux en Y Duodenal By pass"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:31.135498+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 370, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.39", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Social & Preventive Medicine\n\nPearsonian measure of skewness -\n\na) Mode - Mean/ SD\nb) Mean - Mode/ SD\nc) SD/Mode - mean\nd) Mean - Mode/ SD"}], "sampled": ["a) Mode - Mean/ SD"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:31.312513+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 371, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.39", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "b) Mean - Mode/ SD", "picked": null, "sampled": "a) Mode - Mean/ SD", "options": ["b) Mean - Mode/ SD"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:31.312583+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 372, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.258", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Pathology\n\nFactor V Leiden is caused due to a mutation that results in a substitution at position 506 glutamine to which of the following:\n\na) Alanine\nb) Arginine\nc) Glycine\nd) Glutamine"}], "sampled": ["b) Arginine"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:31.346415+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 373, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.258", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "b) Arginine", "picked": "b) Arginine", "sampled": "b) Arginine", "options": ["b) Arginine"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:31.346458+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 374, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.45", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Physiology\n\nGlucose sympo occurs with:\n\na) Na+\nb) Ca++\nc) K+\nd) Cl-"}], "sampled": ["a) Na+"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:31.375316+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 375, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.45", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) Na+", "picked": "a) Na+", "sampled": "a) Na+", "options": ["a) Na+"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:31.375355+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 376, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.11", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Medicine\n\nWhich of the following statements are True/False? 1. Hirsutism, which is defined as androgen-dependent excessive male pattern hair growth, affects approximately 25% of women. 2. Virilization refers to a condition in which androgen levels are sufficiently high to cause additional signs and symptoms. 3. Frequently, patients with growth hormone excess (i.e., acromegaly) present with hirsutism. 4. A simple and commonly used method to grade hair growth is the modified scale of Ferriman and Gallwey. 5. Scores above 8 suggest excess androgen-mediated hair growth.\n\na) 1, 2, 3 True & 4, 5 false\nb) 1, 3, 5 True & 2, 4 false\nc) 2, 4, 5 True & 1, 3 false\nd) 1, 2, 3, 4 True & 5 false"}], "sampled": ["b) 1, 3, 5 True & 2, 4 false"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:31.420884+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 377, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.11", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "c) 2, 4, 5 True & 1, 3 false", "picked": null, "sampled": "b) 1, 3, 5 True & 2, 4 false", "options": ["c) 2, 4, 5 True & 1, 3 false"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:31.420921+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 378, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.123", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Pediatrics\n\nAn ill 16 days old baby girl is brought to the emergency. On examination pallor and dyspnoea present with a respiratory rate of 85 per minute. Her HR is 200 bpm, hea sounds are distant and a gallop is heard. X-ray showed cardiomegaly. An echocardiogram shows dilated ventricles and dilation of the left atrium. An ECG shows ventricular depolarization complexes that have low voltage. Which of the following is the most likely diagnosis?\n\na) CHF\nb) Glycogen storage disease\nc) Pericarditis\nd) Aberrant left coronary aery arising from pulmonary aery"}], "sampled": ["a) CHF"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:31.457733+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 379, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.123", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) CHF", "picked": "a) CHF", "sampled": "a) CHF", "options": ["a) CHF"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:31.457768+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 380, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.139", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Pharmacology\n\nSchizophrenia is treated by\n\na) Anti depressants\nb) Anti psychotics\nc) Anti epileptics\nd) Mood stabilizers"}], "sampled": ["b) Anti psychotics"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:31.591499+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 381, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.139", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "b) Anti psychotics", "picked": "b) Anti psychotics", "sampled": "b) Anti psychotics", "options": ["b) Anti psychotics"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:31.591541+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 382, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.59", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Microbiology\n\nWhich of the following is very difficult to induce antibody -\n\na) Polysaccharide\nb) Protein\nc) Antigen\nd) Effector"}], "sampled": ["a) Polysaccharide"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:31.645242+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 383, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.59", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) Polysaccharide", "picked": "a) Polysaccharide", "sampled": "a) Polysaccharide", "options": ["a) Polysaccharide"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:31.645303+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 384, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.184", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Ophthalmology\n\nA patient on amiodarone is diagnosed to have cornea verticillata. What should be management –\n\na) Stop the drug\nb) Penetrating keratoplasty\nc) Lamellar keratoplasty\nd) Observation"}], "sampled": ["a) Stop the drug"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:31.736418+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 385, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.184", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) Stop the drug", "picked": "a) Stop the drug", "sampled": "a) Stop the drug", "options": ["a) Stop the drug"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:31.736481+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 386, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.126", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Forensic Medicine\n\nWhere does the \"knot\" is put in the neck during judicial hanging?\n\na) The back of the neck\nb) Under angle of jaw\nc) Below the chin\nd) Choice of hangman"}], "sampled": ["b) Under angle of jaw"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:31.958427+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 387, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.126", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "b) Under angle of jaw", "picked": "b) Under angle of jaw", "sampled": "b) Under angle of jaw", "options": ["b) Under angle of jaw"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:31.958477+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 388, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.73", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Dental\n\nDetermination of Pulp vitality by pulse oximeter based on:\n\na) Beer's law.\nb) Pascal's law.\nc) Doppler law.\nd) Poisslues law."}], "sampled": ["c) Doppler law."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:32.031466+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 389, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.73", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "a) Beer's law.", "picked": null, "sampled": "c) Doppler law.", "options": ["a) Beer's law."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:32.031516+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 390, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.246", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Pathology\n\nHereditary spherocytosis is characterized by: March 2004\n\na) Anemia\nb) Splenomegaly\nc) Jaundice\nd) All of the above"}], "sampled": ["d) All of the above"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:32.048222+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 391, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.246", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "d) All of the above", "picked": "d) All of the above", "sampled": "d) All of the above", "options": ["d) All of the above"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:32.048280+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 392, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.15", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Pharmacology\n\nWith which of the following receptors theophylline has an antagonistic interaction ?\n\na) Histamine receptors\nb) Bradykinin receptors\nc) Adenosine receptors\nd) Imidazoline receptors"}], "sampled": ["c) Adenosine receptors"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:32.055085+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 393, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.15", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "c) Adenosine receptors", "picked": "c) Adenosine receptors", "sampled": "c) Adenosine receptors", "options": ["c) Adenosine receptors"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:32.055143+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 394, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.256", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Medicine\n\nPlatypnea is seen with?\n\na) Hepato-pulmonary syndrome\nb) Hepato-renal syndrome\nc) Renal aery stenosis\nd) Kyphoscoliosis"}], "sampled": ["a) Hepato-pulmonary syndrome"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:32.168564+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 395, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.256", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) Hepato-pulmonary syndrome", "picked": "a) Hepato-pulmonary syndrome", "sampled": "a) Hepato-pulmonary syndrome", "options": ["a) Hepato-pulmonary syndrome"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:32.168615+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 396, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.128", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Anatomy\n\nWhich of the following muscle acts as unlocker of knee?\n\na) Gracilis\nb) Popliteus\nc) Saorius\nd) Biceps femoris"}], "sampled": ["b) Popliteus"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:32.203513+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 397, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.128", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "b) Popliteus", "picked": "b) Popliteus", "sampled": "b) Popliteus", "options": ["b) Popliteus"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:32.203568+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 398, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.103", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Orthopaedics\n\nIncrease in pauwel's angle indicate\n\na) Good prognosis\nb) Impaction\nc) More chances of displacement\nd) Trabecular alignment displacement"}], "sampled": ["c) More chances of displacement"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:32.334531+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 399, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.103", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "c) More chances of displacement", "picked": "c) More chances of displacement", "sampled": "c) More chances of displacement", "options": ["c) More chances of displacement"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:32.334581+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 400, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.295", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Biochemistry\n\nAll will predispose to atherosclerosis, except\n\na) Homocystinemia\nb) Fibrinogen\nc) Calcium\nd) Lipoprotein A"}], "sampled": ["b) Fibrinogen"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:32.367821+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 401, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.295", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "c) Calcium", "picked": null, "sampled": "b) Fibrinogen", "options": ["c) Calcium"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:32.367861+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 402, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.217", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Pharmacology\n\nWhich of the following drugs can be administered by subcutaneous route?\n\na) Albuterol\nb) Metaproterenol\nc) Terbutaline\nd) Pirbuterol"}], "sampled": ["All of the above drugs can be administered by subcutaneous route."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:32.480590+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 403, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.217", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "c) Terbutaline", "picked": null, "sampled": "All of the above drugs can be administered by subcutaneous route.", "options": ["c) Terbutaline"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:32.480641+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 404, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.58", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Forensic Medicine\n\nAccording to recent SC judgment, doctor can be charged for medical negligence under 304-A, only if: AIIMS 12\n\na) He is from corporate hospital\nb) Negligence is from inadveent error\nc) Simple negligence\nd) Gross negligence"}], "sampled": ["d) Gross negligence"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:32.594777+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 405, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.58", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "d) Gross negligence", "picked": "d) Gross negligence", "sampled": "d) Gross negligence", "options": ["d) Gross negligence"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:32.594829+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 406, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.90", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Radiology\n\nCauses of thickened gallbladder wall on ultrasound examination are all except:\n\na) Postprandial state\nb) Cholecystitis\nc) Congestive cardiac failure\nd) Kawasaki disease"}], "sampled": ["d) Kawasaki disease"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:32.626150+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 407, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.90", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "d) Kawasaki disease", "picked": "d) Kawasaki disease", "sampled": "d) Kawasaki disease", "options": ["d) Kawasaki disease"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:32.626192+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 408, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.160", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Medicine\n\nA 63 year old man presents with a triad of angina, syncope and congestive hea failure. Which of the following valvular hea lesion can be suspected-\n\na) antral stenosis\nb) Tricuspid regurgitation\nc) Aoic stenosis\nd) Aoic regurgitation"}], "sampled": ["c) Aortic stenosis"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:32.768218+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 409, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.160", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "c) Aoic stenosis", "picked": null, "sampled": "c) Aortic stenosis", "options": ["c) Aoic stenosis"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:32.768255+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 410, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.48", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Biochemistry\n\nIn chronic alcoholism the rate limiting component for alcohol metabolism excluding enzymes is/are : (PGI Dec 2008)\n\na) NADP\nb) NAD+\nc) NADPH\nd) FADH"}], "sampled": ["b) NAD+"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:32.967915+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 411, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.48", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "b) NAD+", "picked": "b) NAD+", "sampled": "b) NAD+", "options": ["b) NAD+"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:32.967976+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 412, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.275", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Anatomy\n\nWhich of the following events is involved in cleavage of the zygote during week 1 of development?\n\na) A series of meiotic divisions forming blastomeres\nb) Production of highly differentiated blastomeres\nc) An increased cytoplasmic content of blastomeres\nd) A decrease in size of blastomeres"}], "sampled": ["a) A series of meiotic divisions forming blastomeres"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:33.055259+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 413, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.275", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "d) A decrease in size of blastomeres", "picked": null, "sampled": "a) A series of meiotic divisions forming blastomeres", "options": ["d) A decrease in size of blastomeres"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:33.055329+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 414, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.4", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Physiology\n\nGrowth hormone has its effect on growth through?\n\na) Directly\nb) IG1-1\nc) Thyroxine\nd) Intranuclear receptors"}], "sampled": ["b) IG1-1"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:33.100366+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 415, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.4", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "b) IG1-1", "picked": "b) IG1-1", "sampled": "b) IG1-1", "options": ["b) IG1-1"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:33.100405+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 416, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.93", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Microbiology\n\nA 12-year-old girl presents to the casualty with symptoms of fever, shoness of breath, and cough. A chest X-ray reveals complete consolidation of the lower lobe of the left lung. Cultures of the lower lobe of the left lung would most likely reveal which organism?\n\na) Streptococcus pneumoniae\nb) Staphylococcus aureus\nc) Klebsiella pneumoniae\nd) Pseudomonas aeruginosa"}], "sampled": ["a) Streptococcus pneumoniae"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:33.105634+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 417, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.93", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) Streptococcus pneumoniae", "picked": "a) Streptococcus pneumoniae", "sampled": "a) Streptococcus pneumoniae", "options": ["a) Streptococcus pneumoniae"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:33.105688+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 418, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.271", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Ophthalmology\n\nChild with mild squint. Intrauterine, bih history, developmental history till date all normal. Corneal reflex normal. All other eye parameters normal except exaggerated epicanthal fold. Diagnosis ?\n\na) Pseudostrabismus\nb) Accomodative squint\nc) Exophoria\nd) Esophoria"}], "sampled": ["a) Pseudostrabismus"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:33.205192+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 419, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.271", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) Pseudostrabismus", "picked": "a) Pseudostrabismus", "sampled": "a) Pseudostrabismus", "options": ["a) Pseudostrabismus"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:33.205243+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 420, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.199", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Anatomy\n\nSupraventricular crest lies between-\n\na) Pulmonary orifice and atrioventricular orifice\nb) Atrioventricular orifice and fossa ovalis\nc) SVC and right atrium\nd) Right an dleft coronary artery"}], "sampled": ["c) SVC and right atrium"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:33.245558+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 421, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.199", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "a) Pulmonary orifice and atrioventricular orifice", "picked": null, "sampled": "c) SVC and right atrium", "options": ["a) Pulmonary orifice and atrioventricular orifice"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:33.245603+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 422, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.150", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Social & Preventive Medicine\n\nTo feel comfoable and cool in a factory the conrrected effective temperature ( in degree Farenheit) should be -\n\na) Less tha 69\nb) Between 69 and 76\nc) Between 77 and 80\nd) Between 81 and 82"}], "sampled": ["b) Between 69 and 76"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:33.272388+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 423, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.150", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "b) Between 69 and 76", "picked": "b) Between 69 and 76", "sampled": "b) Between 69 and 76", "options": ["b) Between 69 and 76"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:33.272431+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 424, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.221", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Pathology\n\nAutosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease features include:\n\na) Can be diagnosed intrauterine\nb) Proceeds to renal failure till children reaches school going age\nc) Can be palpated abdominally\nd) Hypertension doesn't develop until late stages of the disease"}], "sampled": ["a) Can be diagnosed intrauterine"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:33.329690+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 425, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.221", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) Can be diagnosed intrauterine", "picked": "a) Can be diagnosed intrauterine", "sampled": "a) Can be diagnosed intrauterine", "options": ["a) Can be diagnosed intrauterine"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:33.329734+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 426, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.146", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Anatomy\n\nBlood supply of stomach is/are:\n\na) Left gastric aery\nb) Sho gastric aery\nc) Lt gastroepiploic aery\nd) All"}], "sampled": ["d) All"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:33.354861+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 427, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.146", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "d) All", "picked": "d) All", "sampled": "d) All", "options": ["d) All"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:33.354901+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 428, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.273", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Forensic Medicine\n\nNot used for iron poison in: FMGE 09; NEET 13\n\na) Magnesium hydroxide\nb) Desferrioxamine\nc) Gastric lavage\nd) Penicillamine"}], "sampled": ["a) Magnesium hydroxide"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:33.780387+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 429, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.273", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "d) Penicillamine", "picked": null, "sampled": "a) Magnesium hydroxide", "options": ["d) Penicillamine"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:33.780439+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 430, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.261", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Microbiology\n\nFish tank granuloma is seen in -\n\na) Mfortuitum\nb) Mkansasi\nc) Mmarinum\nd) M leprosy"}], "sampled": ["c) Mmarinum"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:33.781759+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 431, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.261", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "c) Mmarinum", "picked": "c) Mmarinum", "sampled": "c) Mmarinum", "options": ["c) Mmarinum"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:33.781807+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 432, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.116", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Pharmacology\n\nThe following drugs have significant drug interactions with digoxin except:\n\na) Cholestyramine\nb) Thiazide diuretics\nc) Quinidine\nd) Amlodipine"}], "sampled": ["d) Amlodipine"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:33.787346+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 433, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.116", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "d) Amlodipine", "picked": "d) Amlodipine", "sampled": "d) Amlodipine", "options": ["d) Amlodipine"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:33.787391+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 434, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.100", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Forensic Medicine\n\nMagistrate inquest not needed in: JIPMER 14\n\na) Homicide\nb) Exhumation\nc) Police custody death\nd) Dowry death"}], "sampled": ["d) Dowry death"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:33.799054+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 435, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.100", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "a) Homicide", "picked": null, "sampled": "d) Dowry death", "options": ["a) Homicide"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:33.799097+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 436, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.99", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Radiology\n\nThe radiograph of a 32 year old patient is shown below. The patient is asymptomatic and the lesion revealed in the radiograph is an accidental finding. The most likely diagnosis is:\n\na) Stafne’s bone cavity\nb) Radicular Cyst\nc) Dentigerous cyst\nd) Lateral periodontal cyst"}], "sampled": ["a) Stafne’s bone cavity"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:33.941121+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 437, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.99", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) Stafne’s bone cavity", "picked": "a) Stafne’s bone cavity", "sampled": "a) Stafne’s bone cavity", "options": ["a) Stafne’s bone cavity"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:33.941184+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 438, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.43", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Surgery\n\nWhich of the following bacterial meningitis is associated with sudural effusion?\n\na) H. influenza\nb) Neisseria meningitits\nc) Streptococcus pneumonia\nd) Enterococcus"}], "sampled": ["c) Streptococcus pneumonia"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:33.997333+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 439, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.43", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "a) H. influenza", "picked": null, "sampled": "c) Streptococcus pneumonia", "options": ["a) H. influenza"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:33.997378+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 440, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.141", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Pathology\n\nA 45-year-old woman complains of severe headaches and difficulty in swallowing. Over the past 6 months, she has noticed small, red lesions around her mouth as well as thickening of her skin. The patient has \"stone facies\" on physical examination. Which of the following antigens is the most common and most specific target of autoantibody in patients with this disease?\n\na) C-ANCA (anti-proteinase-3)\nb) Double-stranded DNA\nc) P-ANCA (anti-myeloperoxidase)\nd) Scl-70 (anti-topoisomerase I)"}], "sampled": ["c) P-ANCA (anti-myeloperoxidase)"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:34.252236+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 441, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.141", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "d) Scl-70 (anti-topoisomerase I)", "picked": null, "sampled": "c) P-ANCA (anti-myeloperoxidase)", "options": ["d) Scl-70 (anti-topoisomerase I)"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:34.252306+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 442, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.21", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: ENT\n\nPosition of vocal cord in cadaver is:\n\na) Median\nb) Paramedian\nc) Intermediate\nd) Full Abduction"}], "sampled": ["b) Paramedian"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:34.375320+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 443, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.21", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "c) Intermediate", "picked": null, "sampled": "b) Paramedian", "options": ["c) Intermediate"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:34.375382+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 444, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.168", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Gynaecology & Obstetrics\n\nWhich of these is the most impoant indication for Strassmans Metroplasty done for a bicornuate uterus?\n\na) Infeility\nb) Menorrhagia\nc) Repeated early pregnancy losses\nd) Associated vaginal atresia"}], "sampled": ["c) Repeated early pregnancy losses"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:34.398124+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 445, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.168", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "c) Repeated early pregnancy losses", "picked": "c) Repeated early pregnancy losses", "sampled": "c) Repeated early pregnancy losses", "options": ["c) Repeated early pregnancy losses"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:34.398176+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 446, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.262", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Microbiology\n\nTYNDALLISATION is a type of\n\na) intermittent sterilization\nb) pasteurisation\nc) boiling\nd) autoclaving"}], "sampled": ["a) intermittent sterilization"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:34.423640+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 447, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.262", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) intermittent sterilization", "picked": "a) intermittent sterilization", "sampled": "a) intermittent sterilization", "options": ["a) intermittent sterilization"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:34.439091+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 448, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.86", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Physiology\n\nFever associated with infection\n\na) Accelerates bacterial and viral replication\nb) Left shifts the oxygen dissociation curve\nc) Is due to interleukin-1 released from CD4 T-helper cells\nd) Increase oxygen release to tissue"}], "sampled": ["c) Is due to interleukin-1 released from CD4 T-helper cells"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:34.573495+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 449, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.86", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "d) Increase oxygen release to tissue", "picked": null, "sampled": "c) Is due to interleukin-1 released from CD4 T-helper cells", "options": ["d) Increase oxygen release to tissue"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:34.573553+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 450, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.185", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Pathology\n\nMost aggressive lung CA:\n\na) Squamous cell CA\nb) Adenocarcinoma\nc) Small cell lung CA\nd) Large cell CA"}], "sampled": ["c) Small cell lung CA"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:34.618048+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 451, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.185", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "c) Small cell lung CA", "picked": "c) Small cell lung CA", "sampled": "c) Small cell lung CA", "options": ["c) Small cell lung CA"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:34.618085+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 452, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.85", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Medicine\n\nRescue P.C.I is done for which of the following?\n\na) Persistent chest pain with ST elevation > 60 min after thrombolysis\nb) Persistent chest pain with ST elevation > 30 min after thrombolysis\nc) Persistent Chest pain with ST elevation >90 min after thrombolysis\nd) Pain with ST elevation for >120minutes after thrombolysis"}], "sampled": ["a) Persistent chest pain with ST elevation > 60 min after thrombolysis"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:34.761442+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 453, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.85", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "c) Persistent Chest pain with ST elevation >90 min after thrombolysis", "picked": null, "sampled": "a) Persistent chest pain with ST elevation > 60 min after thrombolysis", "options": ["c) Persistent Chest pain with ST elevation >90 min after thrombolysis"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:34.761503+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 454, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.67", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Gynaecology & Obstetrics\n\nWhich of the following is the best procedure done for intrapaum fetal monitoring:\n\na) Fetal echocardiography\nb) Fetal scalp pH\nc) Continuous electrical fetal hea monitoring\nd) Physical examination"}], "sampled": ["c) Continuous electrical fetal head monitoring."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:34.798266+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 455, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.67", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "c) Continuous electrical fetal hea monitoring", "picked": null, "sampled": "c) Continuous electrical fetal head monitoring.", "options": ["c) Continuous electrical fetal hea monitoring"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:34.798303+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 456, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.209", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Microbiology\n\nWhich of the following iodinated compound is present in a maximum concentration in the thyroid?\n\na) Monoiodotyrosine (MIT)\nb) Diiodotyrosine (DIT)\nc) T3\nd) Reverse T3"}], "sampled": ["b) Diiodotyrosine (DIT)"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:34.894095+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 457, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.209", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "b) Diiodotyrosine (DIT)", "picked": "b) Diiodotyrosine (DIT)", "sampled": "b) Diiodotyrosine (DIT)", "options": ["b) Diiodotyrosine (DIT)"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:34.894133+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 458, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.277", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Forensic Medicine\n\n'Patterned' abrasion is variety of:\n\na) Linear abrasion\nb) Pressure abrasion\nc) Sliding abrasion\nd) Superficial bruise"}], "sampled": ["c) Sliding abrasion"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:34.973935+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 459, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.277", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "b) Pressure abrasion", "picked": null, "sampled": "c) Sliding abrasion", "options": ["b) Pressure abrasion"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:34.973983+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 460, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.8", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Anaesthesia\n\nCharacteristics of Remifentanyl – a) Metabolised by plasma esteraseb) Short half lifec) More potent than Alfentanyld) Dose reduced in hepatic and renal diseasee) Duration of action more than Alfentanyl\n\na) ab\nb) bc\nc) abc\nd) bcd"}], "sampled": ["b) Short half life"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:35.142354+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 461, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.8", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "c) abc", "picked": null, "sampled": "b) Short half life", "options": ["c) abc"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:35.142412+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 462, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.130", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Microbiology\n\nThe most sensitive method for detecting cervical Chlamydia trachomatis infection is:\n\na) Direct fluorescent antibody test\nb) Enzyme immunoassay\nc) Polymerase chain reaction\nd) Culture on irradiated McConkey cells"}], "sampled": ["c) Polymerase chain reaction"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:35.173925+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 463, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.130", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "c) Polymerase chain reaction", "picked": "c) Polymerase chain reaction", "sampled": "c) Polymerase chain reaction", "options": ["c) Polymerase chain reaction"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:35.173963+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 464, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.46", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Medicine\n\nAll are true about temporal arteritis except -\n\na) Can leads to sudden bilateral blindness\nb) More corrunon in females\nc) Worsen on exposure to heat\nd) Mostly affects elderly"}], "sampled": ["c) Worsen on exposure to heat"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:35.216171+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 465, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.46", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "c) Worsen on exposure to heat", "picked": "c) Worsen on exposure to heat", "sampled": "c) Worsen on exposure to heat", "options": ["c) Worsen on exposure to heat"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:35.216210+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 466, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.251", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Radiology\n\nAll the following are seen in Hyperparathyroidism except\n\na) Subperiosteal erosion of bone\nb) Loss of lamina dura\nc) Calvarial thickening\nd) Pepper - pot skull"}], "sampled": ["Answer: b) Loss of lamina dura"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:35.373713+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 467, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.251", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "c) Calvarial thickening", "picked": null, "sampled": "Answer: b) Loss of lamina dura", "options": ["c) Calvarial thickening"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:35.373771+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 468, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.216", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Dental\n\nThe retention of dowel in a pin retained crown is increased by\n\na) Increased length, smooth surface and increased taper.\nb) Increased length, serrated surface and increased taper.\nc) Increased length, smooth surface and parallel sides.\nd) Increased length, serrated surface and parallel sides."}], "sampled": ["a) Increased length, smooth surface and increased taper."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:35.417457+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 469, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.216", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "d) Increased length, serrated surface and parallel sides.", "picked": null, "sampled": "a) Increased length, smooth surface and increased taper.", "options": ["d) Increased length, serrated surface and parallel sides."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:35.417496+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 470, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.133", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Surgery\n\nCongenital hydrocele is best treated by\n\na) Eversion of sac\nb) Excision of sac\nc) Lord's procedure\nd) Herniotomy"}], "sampled": ["b) Excision of sac"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:35.576379+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 471, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.133", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "d) Herniotomy", "picked": null, "sampled": "b) Excision of sac", "options": ["d) Herniotomy"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:35.576426+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 472, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.171", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Social & Preventive Medicine\n\nBest disinfectant of cholera stool is-\n\na) Bleaching powder\nb) Cresol\nc) Phenol\nd) Lime"}], "sampled": ["a) Bleaching powder"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:35.605294+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 473, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.171", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "b) Cresol", "picked": null, "sampled": "a) Bleaching powder", "options": ["b) Cresol"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:35.605333+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 474, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.95", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Dental\n\nA Dentin 'Primer'?\n\na) Etches the dentin\nb) It increases the surface energy & wets the dentin surface\nc) Removes the smear layer\nd) Conditions the dentin"}], "sampled": ["b) It increases the surface energy & wets the dentin surface."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:35.729725+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 475, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.95", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "b) It increases the surface energy & wets the dentin surface", "picked": "b) It increases the surface energy & wets the dentin surface", "sampled": "b) It increases the surface energy & wets the dentin surface.", "options": ["b) It increases the surface energy & wets the dentin surface"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:35.729785+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 476, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.107", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Biochemistry\n\nWhich of the following is the main enzyme responsible for activation of xenobiotics?\n\na) Cytochrome P-450\nb) Glucuronyl transferase\nc) Glutathione S-transferase\nd) NADPH cytochrome P-450-reductase"}], "sampled": ["a) Cytochrome P-450"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:35.751305+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 477, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.107", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) Cytochrome P-450", "picked": "a) Cytochrome P-450", "sampled": "a) Cytochrome P-450", "options": ["a) Cytochrome P-450"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:35.751346+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 478, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.227", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Pharmacology\n\nWhich is an uricosuric drug-\n\na) Allopurinol\nb) Probenecid\nc) Indomethacin\nd) Aspirin"}], "sampled": ["b) Probenecid"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:35.776677+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 479, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.227", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "b) Probenecid", "picked": "b) Probenecid", "sampled": "b) Probenecid", "options": ["b) Probenecid"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:35.776715+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 480, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.124", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Radiology\n\nEgg shell calcification is seen in all except –\n\na) Sarcoidosis\nb) Silicosis\nc) Post irradiation lymphoma\nd) Bronchogenic CA"}], "sampled": ["b) Silicosis"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:35.809047+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 481, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.124", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "d) Bronchogenic CA", "picked": null, "sampled": "b) Silicosis", "options": ["d) Bronchogenic CA"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:35.809083+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 482, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.283", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Dental\n\nThe main difference between dental stone and dental plaster is:\n\na) Chemical composition\nb) Self life\nc) Shape and size of particles\nd) Solubility in water"}], "sampled": ["a) Chemical composition"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:36.006019+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 483, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.283", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "c) Shape and size of particles", "picked": null, "sampled": "a) Chemical composition", "options": ["c) Shape and size of particles"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:36.006064+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 484, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.213", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Microbiology\n\nH. capsulatum, a dimorphic fungus, is found in soil heavily contaminated with bird droppings. Which of the following statements best describes the presence of the organism in tissue biopsies?\n\na) Yeasts with broad-based bud\nb) Single-cell yeasts with pseudohyphae\nc) Arthrospores\nd) Oval budding yeasts inside macrophages"}], "sampled": ["d) Oval budding yeasts inside macrophages"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:36.151345+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 485, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.213", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "d) Oval budding yeasts inside macrophages", "picked": "d) Oval budding yeasts inside macrophages", "sampled": "d) Oval budding yeasts inside macrophages", "options": ["d) Oval budding yeasts inside macrophages"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:36.151393+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 486, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.163", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Social & Preventive Medicine\n\nHigh false positive cases in a community signify that disease has -\n\na) High prevalence & Low incidence\nb) High incidence & Low prevalence\nc) Low prevalence & Low incidence\nd) High incidence & High prevalence"}], "sampled": ["a) High prevalence & Low incidence"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:36.176545+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 487, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.163", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "b) High incidence & Low prevalence", "picked": null, "sampled": "a) High prevalence & Low incidence", "options": ["b) High incidence & Low prevalence"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:36.176651+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 488, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.203", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Psychiatry\n\n\"Castration anxiety\" is seen in which phase of Sigmond Freud's psychosexual stages of development\n\na) Oral\nb) Anal\nc) Phallic\nd) Genital"}], "sampled": ["c) Phallic"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:36.197365+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 489, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.203", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "c) Phallic", "picked": "c) Phallic", "sampled": "c) Phallic", "options": ["c) Phallic"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:36.197402+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 490, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.298", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Pharmacology\n\nWhich of the following aminoglycosides has the highest nephrotoxicity?\n\na) Paromomycin\nb) Streptomycin\nc) Amikacin\nd) Neomycin"}], "sampled": ["d) Neomycin"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:36.351276+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 491, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.298", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "d) Neomycin", "picked": "d) Neomycin", "sampled": "d) Neomycin", "options": ["d) Neomycin"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:36.351327+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 492, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.152", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Surgery\n\nA 19 year old female presents with pain in the neck for 5 days. She is not able to wear tie for her job because of neck pain. H/O fatigue and lethargy for 10 days. She had flu like symptoms 20 days ago which resolved spontaneously. BP 110/80 mmHg, Pulse 48/min. Extremities are cold and dry. Neck is very tender. ECG normal. TSH is elevated. ESR 30 mm/hr. Next appropriate step\n\na) Atropine injection\nb) Levothyroxine administration\nc) Aspirin\nd) Increase iodine intake in food"}], "sampled": ["b) Levothyroxine administration"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:36.361488+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 493, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.152", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "c) Aspirin", "picked": null, "sampled": "b) Levothyroxine administration", "options": ["c) Aspirin"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:36.361527+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 494, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.111", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Dental\n\nRelining of complete denture is not indicated when\n\na) Denture contains broken teeth\nb) There is excessive resorption of the ridge\nc) Vertical dimension is excessively reduced and has to be changed\nd) Centric relation does not coincide with centric occlusion"}], "sampled": ["a) Denture contains broken teeth"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:36.378343+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 495, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.111", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "c) Vertical dimension is excessively reduced and has to be changed", "picked": null, "sampled": "a) Denture contains broken teeth", "options": ["c) Vertical dimension is excessively reduced and has to be changed"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:36.378382+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 496, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.259", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Forensic Medicine\n\nKunkel's test is done to demonstrate presence of ................. in blood.\n\na) Lead\nb) CuSO4\nc) CO\nd) Dhatura"}], "sampled": ["b) CuSO4"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:36.393644+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 497, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.259", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "c) CO", "picked": null, "sampled": "b) CuSO4", "options": ["c) CO"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:36.393680+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 498, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.196", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Social & Preventive Medicine\n\nPrimary health care was proposed in 1978 at:\n\na) Alma ata\nb) New York\nc) Geneva\nd) Delhi"}], "sampled": ["a) Alma ata"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:36.779053+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 499, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.196", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) Alma ata", "picked": "a) Alma ata", "sampled": "a) Alma ata", "options": ["a) Alma ata"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:36.779094+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 500, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.131", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Microbiology\n\nA labourer involved with repair-work of sewers was admitted with fever, jaundice and renal failure. The most appropriate test to diagnose the infection in this patient is -\n\na) Weil Felix test\nb) Paul Bunnell test\nc) Microscopic agglutination test\nd) Microimmunofluorescence test"}], "sampled": ["c) Microscopic agglutination test"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:36.787202+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 501, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.131", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "c) Microscopic agglutination test", "picked": "c) Microscopic agglutination test", "sampled": "c) Microscopic agglutination test", "options": ["c) Microscopic agglutination test"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:36.787249+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 502, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.101", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Social & Preventive Medicine\n\nWhich of the following disease with bird, ahropod and human chain\n\na) Malaria\nb) Japanese encephalitis\nc) Paragonimus\nd) Plague"}], "sampled": ["b) Japanese encephalitis"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:36.809001+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 503, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.101", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "b) Japanese encephalitis", "picked": "b) Japanese encephalitis", "sampled": "b) Japanese encephalitis", "options": ["b) Japanese encephalitis"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:36.809065+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 504, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.228", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Anatomy\n\nAfter an incised wound ,new collagen fibrils are seen along with a thick layer of growing epithelium.The approximate age of the wound is\n\na) 4-5days\nb) About 1week\nc) 12-24hrs\nd) 24-48 hrs"}], "sampled": ["a) 4-5 days"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:36.815230+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 505, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.228", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "a) 4-5days", "picked": null, "sampled": "a) 4-5 days", "options": ["a) 4-5days"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:36.815276+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 506, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.6", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Gynaecology & Obstetrics\n\nAbnormal vascular patterns seen with colposcopy in case of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia  are all except\n\na) Punctation\nb) Mosaicism\nc) Satellite lesions\nd) Atypical vessels"}], "sampled": ["d) Atypical vessels"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:36.922219+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 507, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.6", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "c) Satellite lesions", "picked": null, "sampled": "d) Atypical vessels", "options": ["c) Satellite lesions"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:36.922342+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 508, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.291", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: ENT\n\nAll are major symptoms of sinusitis except\n\na) Nasal blockage\nb) Facial congestion\nc) Nasal congestion\nd) Halitosis"}], "sampled": ["d) Halitosis"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:36.970756+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 509, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.291", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "d) Halitosis", "picked": "d) Halitosis", "sampled": "d) Halitosis", "options": ["d) Halitosis"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:36.970838+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 510, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.105", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Social & Preventive Medicine\n\nIfa Panchayat is dissolved, elections are to be held within?\n\na) 1 month\nb) 3 months\nc) 6 months\nd) 1 year"}], "sampled": ["c) 6 months"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:37.009267+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 511, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.105", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "c) 6 months", "picked": "c) 6 months", "sampled": "c) 6 months", "options": ["c) 6 months"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:37.009303+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 512, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.247", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Anaesthesia\n\nKetamine can be given by all of following routes except-\n\na) IV\nb) IM\nc) SC\nd) Nasally"}], "sampled": ["d) Nasally"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:37.042024+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 513, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.247", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "c) SC", "picked": null, "sampled": "d) Nasally", "options": ["c) SC"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:37.042061+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 514, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.165", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Physiology\n\nVestibulo-Ocular Reflex Mediated by:\n\na) Flocculonodular Lobe\nb) Vermal portion of Spinocerebel 1 um\nc) Neocerebellum\nd) Paravermal region of Spinocerebellum"}], "sampled": ["a) Flocculonodular Lobe"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:37.047833+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 515, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.165", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) Flocculonodular Lobe", "picked": "a) Flocculonodular Lobe", "sampled": "a) Flocculonodular Lobe", "options": ["a) Flocculonodular Lobe"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:37.047874+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 516, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.175", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Medicine\n\nUsually associated with parvovirus B19 infection in those with hereditary spherocytosis-\n\na) Mild to moderate splenomegaly\nb) Aplastic crisis\nc) Gallstones\nd) Hemolytic crisis"}], "sampled": ["b) Aplastic crisis"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:37.460556+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 517, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.175", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "b) Aplastic crisis", "picked": "b) Aplastic crisis", "sampled": "b) Aplastic crisis", "options": ["b) Aplastic crisis"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:37.460604+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 518, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.156", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Anatomy\n\nLigament teres is a remnant of ?\n\na) Ductus aeriosus\nb) Umbilical aery\nc) Umbilical vein\nd) Ductus venosus"}], "sampled": ["b) Umbilical artery"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:37.463461+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 519, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.156", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "c) Umbilical vein", "picked": null, "sampled": "b) Umbilical artery", "options": ["c) Umbilical vein"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:37.463512+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 520, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.18", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Dental\n\nThe process of hardening a cement matrix through hydration with oral fluids  to achieve greater mechanical strength is known as:\n\na) Maturation\nb) Setting\nc) Hardening\nd) Mineralization"}], "sampled": ["a) Maturation"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:37.467376+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 521, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.18", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) Maturation", "picked": "a) Maturation", "sampled": "a) Maturation", "options": ["a) Maturation"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:37.467419+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 522, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.240", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Ophthalmology\n\nLens develops from?\n\na) Endoderm\nb) Mesoderm\nc) Surface ectoderm\nd) Neuroectoderm"}], "sampled": ["c) Surface ectoderm"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:37.481633+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 523, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.240", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "c) Surface ectoderm", "picked": "c) Surface ectoderm", "sampled": "c) Surface ectoderm", "options": ["c) Surface ectoderm"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:37.481672+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 524, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.135", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Social & Preventive Medicine\n\nVaccine administered by following route is\n\na) Typhoral live\nb) H1n1 killed\nc) H1n1 live\nd) Yellow fever live"}], "sampled": ["d) Yellow fever live"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:37.529328+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 525, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.135", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "c) H1n1 live", "picked": null, "sampled": "d) Yellow fever live", "options": ["c) H1n1 live"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:37.529358+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 526, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.244", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Social & Preventive Medicine\n\nNational program for prevention and control of Cancer, Diabetes, Cardiovascular disease and stroke (NPCDCS), true is -\n\na) Separate centre for stroke, DM, cancer\nb) Implementation in some 5 states over 10 districts\nc) District hospital has specialised facilities\nd) Subcentre has facility for diagnosis and treatment"}], "sampled": ["b) Implementation in some 5 states over 10 districts"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:37.944702+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 527, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.244", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "c) District hospital has specialised facilities", "picked": null, "sampled": "b) Implementation in some 5 states over 10 districts", "options": ["c) District hospital has specialised facilities"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:37.944792+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 528, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.149", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Unknown\n\nBurst supression pattern on EEG is typically seen in:\n\na) Anoxic encephalopathy\nb) Absence seizures\nc) SSPE\nd) Herpes simplex encephalitis"}], "sampled": ["a) Anoxic encephalopathy"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:38.023921+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 529, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.149", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) Anoxic encephalopathy", "picked": "a) Anoxic encephalopathy", "sampled": "a) Anoxic encephalopathy", "options": ["a) Anoxic encephalopathy"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:38.023997+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 530, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.72", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Pharmacology\n\nMark the true statement regarding use of Lithium in maniac-depressive psychosis?\n\na) Monotherapy for acute episodes\nb) Monitoring of serum concentration is not useful for guiding dose adjustment\nc) Can result in leucocytosis\nd) Can result in hypehyroidism on long term use"}], "sampled": ["a) Monotherapy for acute episodes"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:38.033473+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 531, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.72", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "c) Can result in leucocytosis", "picked": null, "sampled": "a) Monotherapy for acute episodes", "options": ["c) Can result in leucocytosis"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:38.033527+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 532, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.47", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Medicine\n\nOf the various modalities used in the treatment of re-threatening effects of hyperkalemia which one of the following as the most rapid onset of action ?\n\na) Hemodialysis\nb) Sodium bicarbonate infusion\nc) Insulin and glucose infusion\nd) Intravenous calcium gluconate"}], "sampled": ["c) Insulin and glucose infusion"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:38.073092+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 533, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.47", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "a) Hemodialysis", "picked": null, "sampled": "c) Insulin and glucose infusion", "options": ["a) Hemodialysis"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:38.073123+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 534, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.10", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Microbiology\n\nNaglers reaction is shown by\n\na) Clostridium tetani\nb) Clostridium botulinum\nc) Clostridium perfringens\nd) Clostridium septicum"}], "sampled": ["c) Clostridium perfringens"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:38.092475+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 535, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.10", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "c) Clostridium perfringens", "picked": "c) Clostridium perfringens", "sampled": "c) Clostridium perfringens", "options": ["c) Clostridium perfringens"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:38.092523+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 536, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.64", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Social & Preventive Medicine\n\nHousehold insectiside used for malaria-\n\na) Malathion\nb) Pyrethrum\nc) Paris green\nd) Permethrin"}], "sampled": ["d) Permethrin"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:38.132028+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 537, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.64", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "a) Malathion", "picked": null, "sampled": "d) Permethrin", "options": ["a) Malathion"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:38.132075+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 538, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.220", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Gynaecology & Obstetrics\n\nPatient diagnosed as squamous cell intraepithelial lesion which of the following has the highest risk for progression to carcinoma;\n\na) Low grade squamous intraepithelial neoplasia\nb) High grade squamous intraepithelial neoplasia\nc) Squamous intraepithelial associated with HPV 16\nd) Squamous intraepithelial neoplasia associated with HIV"}], "sampled": ["b) High grade squamous intraepithelial neoplasia"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:38.166401+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 539, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.220", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "b) High grade squamous intraepithelial neoplasia", "picked": "b) High grade squamous intraepithelial neoplasia", "sampled": "b) High grade squamous intraepithelial neoplasia", "options": ["b) High grade squamous intraepithelial neoplasia"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:38.166446+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 540, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.52", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Ophthalmology\n\nRegarding Sjogren's syndrome, all are true except: September 2010\n\na) Keratoconjuctivitis sicca\nb) Rheumatoid ahritis\nc) Epiphora\nd) Autoimmune in nature"}], "sampled": ["Answer: b) Rheumatoid arthritis"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:38.532884+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 541, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.52", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "c) Epiphora", "picked": null, "sampled": "Answer: b) Rheumatoid arthritis", "options": ["c) Epiphora"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:38.532932+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 542, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.22", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Microbiology\n\nOrganisms that has not been cultured successfully so far is-\n\na) Leptospira\nb) Treponema pallidum\nc) Bordetella\nd) Staphylococcus"}], "sampled": ["b) Treponema pallidum"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:38.560513+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 543, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.22", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "b) Treponema pallidum", "picked": "b) Treponema pallidum", "sampled": "b) Treponema pallidum", "options": ["b) Treponema pallidum"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:38.560564+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 544, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.297", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Psychiatry\n\nLeast commonly seen in conduct disorder seen in girls:-\n\na) Run away from home\nb) High risk sexual behavior\nc) Physical aggression\nd) Emotional bullying"}], "sampled": ["d) Emotional bullying"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:38.646186+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 545, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.297", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "c) Physical aggression", "picked": null, "sampled": "d) Emotional bullying", "options": ["c) Physical aggression"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:38.646249+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 546, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.35", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Microbiology\n\nWhat is the most probable poal of entry of Aspergillus?\n\na) Puncture wound\nb) Blood\nc) Lungs\nd) Gastrointestinal tract"}], "sampled": ["c) Lungs"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:38.660304+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 547, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.35", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "c) Lungs", "picked": "c) Lungs", "sampled": "c) Lungs", "options": ["c) Lungs"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:38.660347+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 548, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.3", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Ophthalmology\n\nFollowing endaerectomy on the right common carotid, a patient is found to be blind in the right eye. It is appears that a small thrombus embolized during surgery and lodged in the aery supplying the optic nerve. Which aery would be blocked?\n\na) Central aery of the retina\nb) Infraorbital aery\nc) Lacrimal aery\nd) Nasociliary aretry"}], "sampled": ["d) Nasociliary artery"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:38.682661+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 549, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.3", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "a) Central aery of the retina", "picked": null, "sampled": "d) Nasociliary artery", "options": ["a) Central aery of the retina"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:38.682697+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 550, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.193", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Pathology\n\nMagic syndrome is seen in:\n\na) Behcet disease\nb) Aphthous major\nc) Herpetiform\nd) Bloom syndrome"}], "sampled": ["a) Behcet disease"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:38.689460+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 551, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.193", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) Behcet disease", "picked": "a) Behcet disease", "sampled": "a) Behcet disease", "options": ["a) Behcet disease"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:38.689501+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 552, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.161", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Pathology\n\nGeneralised thickening of cortical and cancellous bones is seen in\n\na) Osteopetrosis\nb) Pagets disease\nc) Osteogenesis imperfecta\nd) Infantile hyperostosis"}], "sampled": ["a) Osteopetrosis"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:38.693168+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 553, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.161", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "d) Infantile hyperostosis", "picked": null, "sampled": "a) Osteopetrosis", "options": ["d) Infantile hyperostosis"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:38.693205+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 554, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.223", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Anatomy\n\nBicipital aponeurosis lies over which structure in cubital fossa:-\n\na) Median cubital vein\nb) Radial nerve\nc) Brachial aery\nd) Anterior interosseous aery"}], "sampled": ["a) Median cubital vein"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:38.793276+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 555, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.223", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "c) Brachial aery", "picked": null, "sampled": "a) Median cubital vein", "options": ["c) Brachial aery"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:38.793328+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 556, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.229", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Gynaecology & Obstetrics\n\nAfter delivery, a 28 year old pre ecclamptic primigra has a soft uterus with moderate-to-heavy bleeding. There is no laceration and there is PPH diagnosed due to uterine atony. Which of the following is the best management option?\n\na) 0.2-mg intramuscular (IM) ergonovine (Methergine)\nb) 20 units of IV oxytocin\nc) 10 units of oral oxytocin\nd) 250 mg prostaglandin F2-alpha orally"}], "sampled": ["b) 20 units of IV oxytocin"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:38.908622+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 557, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.229", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "b) 20 units of IV oxytocin", "picked": "b) 20 units of IV oxytocin", "sampled": "b) 20 units of IV oxytocin", "options": ["b) 20 units of IV oxytocin"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:38.908685+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 558, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.0", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Anatomy\n\nChronic urethral obstruction due to benign prismatic hyperplasia can lead to the following change in kidney parenchyma\n\na) Hyperplasia\nb) Hyperophy\nc) Atrophy\nd) Dyplasia"}], "sampled": ["c) Atrophy"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:39.044152+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 559, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.0", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "c) Atrophy", "picked": "c) Atrophy", "sampled": "c) Atrophy", "options": ["c) Atrophy"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:39.044204+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 560, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.83", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Microbiology\n\nFoam cells are seen in infection with which virus ?\n\na) Measles\nb) EBV\nc) Molluscum contagiosum\nd) RSV"}], "sampled": ["a) Measles"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:39.108021+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 561, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.83", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "b) EBV", "picked": null, "sampled": "a) Measles", "options": ["b) EBV"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:39.108068+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 562, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.289", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Microbiology\n\n\"Acute Meningoencephalitis\" is caused by:\n\na) E. histolytica\nb) Nageleria\nc) Giardia\nd) E.coli"}], "sampled": ["b) Nageleria"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:39.205860+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 563, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.289", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "b) Nageleria", "picked": "b) Nageleria", "sampled": "b) Nageleria", "options": ["b) Nageleria"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:39.205911+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 564, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.172", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Forensic Medicine\n\nBlack eye is a type of -\n\na) Patterend abrasion\nb) Ectopic abrasion\nc) Ectopic bruise\nd) Friction abrasion"}], "sampled": ["c) Ectopic bruise"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:39.329013+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 565, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.172", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "c) Ectopic bruise", "picked": "c) Ectopic bruise", "sampled": "c) Ectopic bruise", "options": ["c) Ectopic bruise"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:39.329070+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 566, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.299", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Physiology\n\nLeast conduction velocity is seen in:\n\na) AV node\nb) Purkinje fibers\nc) Bundle of His\nd) Ventricular myocardial fibres"}], "sampled": ["a) AV node"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:39.376376+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 567, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.299", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) AV node", "picked": "a) AV node", "sampled": "a) AV node", "options": ["a) AV node"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:39.376411+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 568, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.81", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Physiology\n\nWhat is the pressure of inspiration?\n\na) Intrapleuarl\nb) Transpulmonary\nc) Trans chest wall\nd) Alveolar pressure"}], "sampled": ["b) Transpulmonary"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:39.450984+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 569, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.81", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "a) Intrapleuarl", "picked": null, "sampled": "b) Transpulmonary", "options": ["a) Intrapleuarl"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:39.451043+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 570, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.69", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Microbiology\n\nWhich of the following is a newly emerging food poisoning organism\n\na) Salmonella typhimurium\nb) Enterococcus\nc) Diphtheria\nd) Pseudomonas"}], "sampled": ["b) Enterococcus"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:39.481524+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 571, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.69", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "a) Salmonella typhimurium", "picked": null, "sampled": "b) Enterococcus", "options": ["a) Salmonella typhimurium"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:39.481672+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 572, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.174", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Anatomy\n\nEndolymphatic duct drains into :\n\na) Subdural space\nb) External space\nc) Subarachnoid space\nd) Succulus"}], "sampled": ["d) Succulus"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:39.512766+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 573, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.174", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "a) Subdural space", "picked": null, "sampled": "d) Succulus", "options": ["a) Subdural space"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:39.512806+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 574, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.125", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Anatomy\n\nIn inversion of the foot, the sole will face:\n\na) Upwards\nb) Downwards\nc) Laterally\nd) Medially"}], "sampled": ["b) Downwards"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:39.529267+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 575, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.125", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "d) Medially", "picked": null, "sampled": "b) Downwards", "options": ["d) Medially"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:39.529332+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 576, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.170", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Ophthalmology\n\nWhich test helps to differentiate between concomitant squint and paralytic squint\n\na) Cover - uncover test\nb) Alternate covertest\nc) Direct cover test\nd) None of the above"}], "sampled": ["b) Alternate cover test"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:39.709316+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 577, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.170", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "b) Alternate covertest", "picked": null, "sampled": "b) Alternate cover test", "options": ["b) Alternate covertest"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:39.709373+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 578, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.287", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Medicine\n\nMiddle aged female with mass in sella turcica hormone increased is -\n\na) Prolactin\nb) Thyroxine\nc) Extrogen\nd) ADH"}], "sampled": ["a) Prolactin"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:39.844975+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 579, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.287", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) Prolactin", "picked": "a) Prolactin", "sampled": "a) Prolactin", "options": ["a) Prolactin"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:39.845032+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 580, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.194", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Microbiology\n\nAcute hemorrhagic conjunctivitis is caused by ?\n\na) Enterovirus 70\nb) Adenovirus\nc) Poliovirus\nd) Hepadnavirus"}], "sampled": ["a) Enterovirus 70"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:39.936524+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 581, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.194", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) Enterovirus 70", "picked": "a) Enterovirus 70", "sampled": "a) Enterovirus 70", "options": ["a) Enterovirus 70"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:39.936672+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 582, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.19", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Anatomy\n\nSuperior vena cava is derived from:\n\na) Aortic arch\nb) Pharyngeal arch\nc) Cardinal vein\nd) Vitelline vein"}], "sampled": ["c) Cardinal vein"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:40.049627+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 583, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.19", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "c) Cardinal vein", "picked": "c) Cardinal vein", "sampled": "c) Cardinal vein", "options": ["c) Cardinal vein"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:40.049690+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 584, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.55", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Pharmacology\n\nGp2b3A inhibitors are all except -\n\na) Abciximab\nb) Eptifibatide\nc) Tirofiban\nd) Prasugrel"}], "sampled": ["d) Prasugrel"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:40.060103+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 585, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.55", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "d) Prasugrel", "picked": "d) Prasugrel", "sampled": "d) Prasugrel", "options": ["d) Prasugrel"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:40.060146+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 586, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.136", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Medicine\n\nA 40-year old diabetic patient presents with proptosis of one eye and black eschar over palate. The likely organism is :\n\na) Pseudomonas\nb) Candida\nc) E. coli\nd) Mucor"}], "sampled": ["d) Mucor"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:40.079777+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 587, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.136", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "d) Mucor", "picked": "d) Mucor", "sampled": "d) Mucor", "options": ["d) Mucor"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:40.079825+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 588, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.208", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Psychiatry\n\nIn Profound MR, IQ is\n\na) 50-69\nb) 35-49\nc) 20-34\nd) < 20"}], "sampled": ["d) < 20"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:40.159409+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 589, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.208", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "d) < 20", "picked": "d) < 20", "sampled": "d) < 20", "options": ["d) < 20"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:40.159452+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 590, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.274", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Anatomy\n\nPosterior relations of the head of the pancreas include all of the following, except:\n\na) First pa of the duodenum\nb) Common bile duct\nc) Inferior vena cava\nd) Aoa"}], "sampled": ["c) Inferior vena cava"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:40.163929+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 591, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.274", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "a) First pa of the duodenum", "picked": null, "sampled": "c) Inferior vena cava", "options": ["a) First pa of the duodenum"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:40.163969+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 592, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.137", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Medicine\n\nColoured urine is not seen in :\n\na) Quinine\nb) Rifampcin\nc) Nitrofurantoin\nd) Pyridium"}], "sampled": ["b) Rifampcin"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:40.353827+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 593, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.137", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "a) Quinine", "picked": null, "sampled": "b) Rifampcin", "options": ["a) Quinine"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:40.353895+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 594, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.26", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Pediatrics\n\nWhich of the following agents is most commonly associated with recurrent meningitis due to CSF leaks?\n\na) Meningococci\nb) Pneumococci\nc) Hemophilus Influenza\nd) E. Coli"}], "sampled": ["b) Pneumococci"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:40.735764+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 595, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.26", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "b) Pneumococci", "picked": "b) Pneumococci", "sampled": "b) Pneumococci", "options": ["b) Pneumococci"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:40.735826+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 596, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.44", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Pathology\n\nAll of the following statements are true regarding hyperophy, except:\n\na) Occurs due to synthesis and assembly of additional intracellular components.\nb) There is an increase in the size of the cells.\nc) Cells capable of division respond to stress by hyperophy and hyperplasia.\nd) There is an increase in the number of cells."}], "sampled": ["d) There is an increase in the number of cells."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:40.753219+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 597, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.44", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "d) There is an increase in the number of cells.", "picked": "d) There is an increase in the number of cells.", "sampled": "d) There is an increase in the number of cells.", "options": ["d) There is an increase in the number of cells."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:40.753281+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 598, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.117", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Medicine\n\nAntiboiotic Prophylaxis for infective endocarditis is indicated in:\n\na) Isolated secundum ASD\nb) Mitral valve prolapse without regurgitation\nc) Prior coronary aery bypass graft\nd) Coarctation of aoa"}], "sampled": ["a) Isolated secundum ASD."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:52.332354+00:00"}
+{"final_report": {"accuracy": 0.5666666666666667}}
+{"run_id": "230502230114T4U6DDPJ", "event_id": 599, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.117", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "d) Coarctation of aoa", "picked": null, "sampled": "a) Isolated secundum ASD.", "options": ["d) Coarctation of aoa"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:01:52.345840+00:00"}
diff --git a/evals/medmcqa/med-4.jsonl b/evals/medmcqa/med-4.jsonl
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..37bde904559dd529ca83a9ba2cf70109ea7a67c1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/evals/medmcqa/med-4.jsonl
@@ -0,0 +1,602 @@
+{"spec": {"completion_fns": ["gpt-4"], "eval_name": "medmcqa.dev.v0", "base_eval": "medmcqa", "split": "dev", "run_config": {"completion_fns": ["gpt-4"], "eval_spec": {"cls": "evals.elsuite.basic.match:Match", "args": {"samples_jsonl": "medmcqa/samples.jsonl"}, "key": "medmcqa.dev.v0", "group": "medmcqa"}, "seed": 20220722, "max_samples": null, "command": "/Users/acabrera/dev-research/22-zeno/openai-eval/evals/evals/cli/oaieval.py gpt-4 medmcqa", "initial_settings": {"visible": true}}, "created_by": "", "run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:26.327913"}}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 0, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.87", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Forensic Medicine\n\nLast organ to putrefy in females is?\n\na) Liver\nb) Uterus\nc) Brain\nd) Breast"}], "sampled": ["b) Uterus"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:27.644765+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 1, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.87", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "b) Uterus", "picked": "b) Uterus", "sampled": "b) Uterus", "options": ["b) Uterus"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:27.644853+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 2, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.63", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Anaesthesia\n\nDrug causing malignant hyperthermia:(Asked twice in the exam)\n\na) Cisatracurium\nb) Suxamethonium\nc) Propofol\nd) Thiopentone"}], "sampled": ["b) Suxamethonium"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:27.883472+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 3, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.63", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "b) Suxamethonium", "picked": "b) Suxamethonium", "sampled": "b) Suxamethonium", "options": ["b) Suxamethonium"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:27.883518+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 4, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.286", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Radiology\n\nAll the teeth in patient’s mouth are similarly affected as shown in the radiograph. What is the most likely anomaly?\n\na) Type 1 dentinal dysplasia\nb) Type 2 dentinal dysplasia\nc) Taurodontism\nd) Amelogenesis imperfecta"}], "sampled": ["d) Amelogenesis imperfecta"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:28.412704+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 5, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.286", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "b) Type 2 dentinal dysplasia", "picked": null, "sampled": "d) Amelogenesis imperfecta", "options": ["b) Type 2 dentinal dysplasia"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:28.412761+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 6, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.127", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Microbiology\n\nSeal finger and whale finger are associated with -\n\na) Listeria\nb) Erysipelothrix\nc) Corynebacterium\nd) Treponema"}], "sampled": ["b) Erysipelothrix"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:28.461115+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 7, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.127", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "b) Erysipelothrix", "picked": "b) Erysipelothrix", "sampled": "b) Erysipelothrix", "options": ["b) Erysipelothrix"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:28.461157+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 8, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.252", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Microbiology\n\nSpore forming anaerobic gram positive bacilli ?\n\na) Bacillus Anthracis\nb) Clostridia\nc) Corynebacterium\nd) Peptostreptococcus"}], "sampled": ["b) Clostridia"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:28.635086+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 9, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.252", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "b) Clostridia", "picked": "b) Clostridia", "sampled": "b) Clostridia", "options": ["b) Clostridia"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:28.635132+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 10, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.180", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Forensic Medicine\n\nUnder transplantation of humans organs act, the punishment for the doctor involved is\n\na) < 1 year\nb) < 2 years\nc) 2-5 years\nd) > 5 years"}], "sampled": ["c) 2-5 years"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:28.884279+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 11, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.180", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "c) 2-5 years", "picked": "c) 2-5 years", "sampled": "c) 2-5 years", "options": ["c) 2-5 years"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:28.884326+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 12, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.198", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Pathology\n\nGene involved in Cowden syndrome is\n\na) P53\nb) PTEN\nc) RB\nd) Ras"}], "sampled": ["b) PTEN"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:28.994854+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 13, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.198", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "b) PTEN", "picked": "b) PTEN", "sampled": "b) PTEN", "options": ["b) PTEN"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:28.994902+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 14, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.282", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Surgery\n\nWhich of the following statement is false about hydrocele?\n\na) Arises due to patent processus vaginalis\nb) Wait for 5 years for spontaneous closure of congenital hydrocele\nc) Lord's plication of sac for small hydrocele\nd) Jaboulay's eversion of sac for medium hydrocele"}], "sampled": ["b) Wait for 5 years for spontaneous closure of congenital hydrocele"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:29.226115+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 15, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.282", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "b) Wait for 5 years for spontaneous closure of congenital hydrocele", "picked": "b) Wait for 5 years for spontaneous closure of congenital hydrocele", "sampled": "b) Wait for 5 years for spontaneous closure of congenital hydrocele", "options": ["b) Wait for 5 years for spontaneous closure of congenital hydrocele"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:29.226179+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 16, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.231", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Biochemistry\n\nArrange the following 4 enzymes of gluconeogenesis in sequence: A. Pyruvate carboxylase B. Glucose - 6 - phosphatase C. Phosphoenol pyruvate carboxy kinase D. Fructose 1,6 Bisphosphatase\n\na) D-C-A-B\nb) A-C-D-B\nc) B-A-D-C\nd) C-D-B-A"}], "sampled": ["b) A-C-D-B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:29.251104+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 17, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.231", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "b) A-C-D-B", "picked": "b) A-C-D-B", "sampled": "b) A-C-D-B", "options": ["b) A-C-D-B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:29.251381+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 18, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.169", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Forensic Medicine\n\nA 2-year-old child had burns on buttocks, both legs, face, neck and singeing of hair. Total surface area burnt: JIPMER 14\n\na) 27%\nb) 37%\nc) 45%\nd) 55%"}], "sampled": ["b) 37%"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:29.263662+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 19, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.169", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "b) 37%", "picked": "b) 37%", "sampled": "b) 37%", "options": ["b) 37%"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:29.263724+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 20, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.9", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Psychiatry\n\nHypomimia is ?\n\na) Decreased ability to copy\nb) Decreased execution\nc) Deficit of expression by gesture\nd) Deficit of fluent speech"}], "sampled": ["c) Deficit of expression by gesture"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:29.332979+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 21, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.9", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "c) Deficit of expression by gesture", "picked": "c) Deficit of expression by gesture", "sampled": "c) Deficit of expression by gesture", "options": ["c) Deficit of expression by gesture"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:29.333056+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 22, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.210", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Social & Preventive Medicine\n\nSilicosis caused by ?\n\na) Gold\nb) Coal\nc) CO\nd) Silica"}], "sampled": ["d) Silica"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:29.779966+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 23, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.210", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "d) Silica", "picked": "d) Silica", "sampled": "d) Silica", "options": ["d) Silica"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:29.780013+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 24, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.225", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Surgery\n\nThe commonest site of perforation during colonoscopy is -\n\na) Caecum\nb) Hepatic flexure\nc) Splenic flexure\nd) Sigmoid colon"}], "sampled": ["a) Caecum"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:30.188092+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 25, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.225", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "d) Sigmoid colon", "picked": null, "sampled": "a) Caecum", "options": ["d) Sigmoid colon"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:30.188170+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 26, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.154", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Anatomy\n\nA 27-year female wearing high heels stumbled and sustained inversion injury at ankle. Which ligament is most likely to be injured in the given case?\n\na) A\nb) B\nc) C\nd) D"}], "sampled": ["a) A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:30.282440+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 27, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.154", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) A", "picked": "a) A", "sampled": "a) A", "options": ["a) A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:30.282481+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 28, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.206", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Dental\n\nCalcium silicate based material is:\n\na) MTA\nb) Geristore\nc) Dieket\nd) Retroplast"}], "sampled": ["a) MTA"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:30.370284+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 29, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.206", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) MTA", "picked": "a) MTA", "sampled": "a) MTA", "options": ["a) MTA"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:30.370343+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 30, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.108", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Biochemistry\n\nIn Familial hypercholesterolemia there is deficiency of\n\na) LDL receptor\nb) Apoprotein A\nc) Apo protein C\nd) Lipoprotein lipase"}], "sampled": ["a) LDL receptor"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:30.452494+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 31, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.108", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) LDL receptor", "picked": "a) LDL receptor", "sampled": "a) LDL receptor", "options": ["a) LDL receptor"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:30.452554+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 32, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.211", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Social & Preventive Medicine\n\nHuman development index includes -\n\na) Crude death rate\nb) Life expectancy at one year\nc) Life expectancy at bih\nd) All"}], "sampled": ["c) Life expectancy at birth"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:30.600921+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 33, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.211", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "c) Life expectancy at bih", "picked": null, "sampled": "c) Life expectancy at birth", "options": ["c) Life expectancy at bih"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:30.600972+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 34, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.97", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Anatomy\n\nFollowing are fibrous joints :\n\na) Pubic symphysis\nb) Fronto parietal suture\nc) Manubrio sternal joint\nd) Inf. radio ulnar joint"}], "sampled": ["b) Fronto parietal suture"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:30.641456+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 35, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.97", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "b) Fronto parietal suture", "picked": "b) Fronto parietal suture", "sampled": "b) Fronto parietal suture", "options": ["b) Fronto parietal suture"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:30.641491+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 36, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.293", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Anatomy\n\nNasal septum is formed except by\n\na) Perpendicular plate of ethmoid\nb) Vomer\nc) Nasal bone\nd) Lateral cailage"}], "sampled": ["c) Nasal bone"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:30.838110+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 37, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.293", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "d) Lateral cailage", "picked": null, "sampled": "c) Nasal bone", "options": ["d) Lateral cailage"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:30.838149+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 38, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.284", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Pediatrics\n\nA normally developing 10 months old child should be able to do all of the following except –\n\na) Stand alone\nb) Play peak to boo\nc) Pick up a pellet with thumb and index finger\nd) Build a tower of 3–4 cubes"}], "sampled": ["a) Stand alone"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:31.148505+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 39, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.284", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "d) Build a tower of 3–4 cubes", "picked": null, "sampled": "a) Stand alone", "options": ["d) Build a tower of 3–4 cubes"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:31.148545+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 40, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.119", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Orthopaedics\n\nOrtolani's test is done for\n\na) Congenial dislocation of the knee joints\nb) Congenital dislocation of the hip joints\nc) Congenital dislocation of the shoulder joints\nd) Congenital dislocation of the elbow joints"}], "sampled": ["b) Congenital dislocation of the hip joints"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:31.718354+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 41, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.119", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "b) Congenital dislocation of the hip joints", "picked": "b) Congenital dislocation of the hip joints", "sampled": "b) Congenital dislocation of the hip joints", "options": ["b) Congenital dislocation of the hip joints"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:31.718410+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 42, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.12", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Anatomy\n\nThe pharmakokinetic change occurring in geriatric patient is due to\n\na) Gastric absorption\nb) Liver metabolism\nc) Renal clearance\nd) Hypersensitivity"}], "sampled": ["c) Renal clearance"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:31.958406+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 43, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.12", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "c) Renal clearance", "picked": "c) Renal clearance", "sampled": "c) Renal clearance", "options": ["c) Renal clearance"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:31.958456+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 44, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.56", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Social & Preventive Medicine\n\nTrue of case control studies -\n\na) It proceeds from cause to effect\nb) Odds ratio can be calculated\nc) Incidence can be calculated\nd) Needs many patients"}], "sampled": ["b) Odds ratio can be calculated"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:32.064922+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 45, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.56", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "b) Odds ratio can be calculated", "picked": "b) Odds ratio can be calculated", "sampled": "b) Odds ratio can be calculated", "options": ["b) Odds ratio can be calculated"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:32.064989+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 46, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.276", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Medicine\n\nA female child with virilization, hypertension with low plasma renin diagnosis is :\n\na) 21α hydroxylase deficiency\nb) 11 β hydroxylase deficiency\nc) 3β hydroxylase deficiency\nd) Conn’s syndrome"}], "sampled": ["b) 11 β hydroxylase deficiency"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:32.178537+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 47, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.276", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "b) 11 β hydroxylase deficiency", "picked": "b) 11 β hydroxylase deficiency", "sampled": "b) 11 β hydroxylase deficiency", "options": ["b) 11 β hydroxylase deficiency"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:32.178576+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 48, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.200", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Physiology\n\nWhich of the following is freely filtered by kidney across glomerular capillariesa)  Albumin (across glomerular capillaries)b) Globulinc) Creatinined) HCO3 e)  Glucose\n\na) cde\nb) acd\nc) bde\nd) ade"}], "sampled": ["d) ade"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:32.189824+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 49, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.200", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "a) cde", "picked": null, "sampled": "d) ade", "options": ["a) cde"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:32.189871+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 50, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.192", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Medicine\n\nWhich test is not useful in a patient with history of Syncopal attack?\n\na) Electrophysiological testing\nb) Tilt Table testing\nc) PET Scan\nd) Holter monitoring"}], "sampled": ["c) PET Scan"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:32.655658+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 51, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.192", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "c) PET Scan", "picked": "c) PET Scan", "sampled": "c) PET Scan", "options": ["c) PET Scan"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:32.655697+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 52, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.80", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Surgery\n\nDelayed union of fracture of a bone follo-wing a surgical treatment may be due to\n\na) Infection\nb) Inadequate circulation\nc) Inadequate mobilization\nd) All of the above"}], "sampled": ["d) All of the above"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:32.862695+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 53, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.80", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "d) All of the above", "picked": "d) All of the above", "sampled": "d) All of the above", "options": ["d) All of the above"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:32.862741+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 54, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.79", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Surgery\n\nWhich of the following muscle is not a hybrid muscle\n\na) Pectoralis major\nb) Extensor digitorum\nc) Flexor digitorum profundus\nd) Brachialis"}], "sampled": ["b) Extensor digitorum"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:33.355497+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 55, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.79", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "b) Extensor digitorum", "picked": "b) Extensor digitorum", "sampled": "b) Extensor digitorum", "options": ["b) Extensor digitorum"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:33.355546+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 56, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.153", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Surgery\n\nHeadache, apathy and deteriorating level of consciousness occurring weeks after head injury suggests;\n\na) Chronic subdral haematoma.\nb) Pontine hemorrhage\nc) Continuing cerebral.\nd) Depressed skull fracture."}], "sampled": ["a) Chronic subdral haematoma."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:33.362841+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 57, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.153", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) Chronic subdral haematoma.", "picked": "a) Chronic subdral haematoma.", "sampled": "a) Chronic subdral haematoma.", "options": ["a) Chronic subdral haematoma."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:33.362891+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 58, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.214", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Microbiology\n\nBudding reproduction in tissue is seen in\n\na) Cryptococcus, candida\nb) Candida, rhizopus\nc) Rhizopus, mucor\nd) Histoplasma, candida"}], "sampled": ["a) Cryptococcus, candida"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:33.593100+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 59, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.214", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) Cryptococcus, candida", "picked": "a) Cryptococcus, candida", "sampled": "a) Cryptococcus, candida", "options": ["a) Cryptococcus, candida"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:33.593156+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 60, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.70", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Pathology\n\nAtherosclerosis initiation by fibroblast plaque is mediated by injury to ?\n\na) Smooth muscle\nb) Media\nc) Adventitia\nd) Endothelium"}], "sampled": ["d) Endothelium"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:33.941200+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 61, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.70", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "d) Endothelium", "picked": "d) Endothelium", "sampled": "d) Endothelium", "options": ["d) Endothelium"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:33.941264+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 62, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.164", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Physiology\n\nWhich of the following is released from hypothalamus?\n\na) Orexin\nb) Cortisol releasing hormone\nc) Neuropeptide\nd) Ghrelin"}], "sampled": ["b) Cortisol releasing hormone"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:34.088796+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 63, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.164", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "b) Cortisol releasing hormone", "picked": "b) Cortisol releasing hormone", "sampled": "b) Cortisol releasing hormone", "options": ["b) Cortisol releasing hormone"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:34.088843+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 64, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.281", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Anatomy\n\nTrue statements about parotid gland\n\na) Duct opens oppsite to upper 2nd molar tooth\nb) Duct pierces Masseter\nc) Develops from ectoderm\nd) Secretomotor fibres come from facial nerve"}], "sampled": ["b) Duct pierces Masseter"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:34.103781+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 65, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.281", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "a) Duct opens oppsite to upper 2nd molar tooth", "picked": null, "sampled": "b) Duct pierces Masseter", "options": ["a) Duct opens oppsite to upper 2nd molar tooth"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:34.103830+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 66, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.147", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Microbiology\n\nWhich of the following ultrasound finding has the highest association with aneuploidy?\n\na) Choroid plexus cyst\nb) Nuchal translucency\nc) Cystic hygroma\nd) Single umbilical aery"}], "sampled": ["c) Cystic hygroma"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:34.264548+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 67, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.147", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "c) Cystic hygroma", "picked": "c) Cystic hygroma", "sampled": "c) Cystic hygroma", "options": ["c) Cystic hygroma"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:34.264595+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 68, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.148", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Biochemistry\n\nWhich of the following is not a component of transpo system?\n\na) Receptor activation\nb) Selective gate\nc) Non-selective channel\nd) Energy coupling system"}], "sampled": ["c) Non-selective channel"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:34.871060+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 69, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.148", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "a) Receptor activation", "picked": null, "sampled": "c) Non-selective channel", "options": ["a) Receptor activation"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:34.871109+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 70, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.23", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Social & Preventive Medicine\n\nNormal waist hip ratio of a female is below\n\na) 0.7\nb) 0.8\nc) 0.9\nd) 1"}], "sampled": ["a) 0.7"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:34.899722+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 71, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.23", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "b) 0.8", "picked": null, "sampled": "a) 0.7", "options": ["b) 0.8"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:34.899758+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 72, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.195", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Anatomy\n\nIn a 24 year old man weight of the upper limb is transmitted to the axial skeleton by:\n\na) Coracoacromial ligament\nb) Coracoclavicular ligament\nc) Costoclavicular ligament\nd) Coracohumeral ligament"}], "sampled": ["b) Coracoclavicular ligament"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:35.213426+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 73, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.195", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "b) Coracoclavicular ligament", "picked": "b) Coracoclavicular ligament", "sampled": "b) Coracoclavicular ligament", "options": ["b) Coracoclavicular ligament"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:35.213473+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 74, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.272", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Physiology\n\nPain-sensitive intracranial structure is:\n\na) Piamater\nb) Pial vassels\nc) Duramater\nd) Brain matter"}], "sampled": ["b) Pial vassels"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:35.586377+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 75, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.272", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "c) Duramater", "picked": null, "sampled": "b) Pial vassels", "options": ["c) Duramater"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:35.586412+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 76, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.260", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Surgery\n\nIn which case cystometric study is indicated -\n\na) Neurogenic bladder\nb) Stress incontinence\nc) Fistula\nd) Urge incontinence"}], "sampled": ["a) Neurogenic bladder"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:35.607461+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 77, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.260", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) Neurogenic bladder", "picked": "a) Neurogenic bladder", "sampled": "a) Neurogenic bladder", "options": ["a) Neurogenic bladder"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:35.607518+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 78, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.122", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Medicine\n\nWhich of the following may be seen in second degree Hea block (select three options):\n\na) Change in QRS complex morphology\nb) Atrial rate more than ventricular rate\nc) Prolonged conduction time\nd) All of the above"}], "sampled": ["a, b, c"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:35.653233+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 79, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.122", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "d) All of the above", "picked": null, "sampled": "a, b, c", "options": ["d) All of the above"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:35.653265+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 80, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.134", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Biochemistry\n\nRate limiting step in cholesterol synthesis is catalysed by which of the following enzyme?\n\na) HMG CoA synthetase\nb) HMG CoA reductase\nc) Thiokinase\nd) Mevalonate kinase"}], "sampled": ["b) HMG CoA reductase"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:35.724276+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 81, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.134", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "b) HMG CoA reductase", "picked": "b) HMG CoA reductase", "sampled": "b) HMG CoA reductase", "options": ["b) HMG CoA reductase"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:35.724335+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 82, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.144", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Medicine\n\nFlipped LDH indicating Myocardial Infarction is represented by:\n\na) LDH-1> LDH-2\nb) LDH-2 > LDH-1\nc) LDH-4 > LDH-5\nd) LDH-5 > LDH-4"}], "sampled": ["a) LDH-1> LDH-2"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:36.361190+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 83, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.144", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) LDH-1> LDH-2", "picked": "a) LDH-1> LDH-2", "sampled": "a) LDH-1> LDH-2", "options": ["a) LDH-1> LDH-2"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:36.361298+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 84, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.264", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Microbiology\n\nSedimentation coefficient of Ig E is:\n\na) 7S\nb) 8S\nc) 11S\nd) 20 S"}], "sampled": ["a) 7S"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:36.713930+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 85, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.264", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "b) 8S", "picked": null, "sampled": "a) 7S", "options": ["b) 8S"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:36.713969+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 86, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.140", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Microbiology\n\nFries test is used in the diagnosis of:\n\na) Gonorrhoea\nb) Herpes\nc) Chanchroid\nd) Granuloma venereum"}], "sampled": ["a) Gonorrhoea"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:36.842769+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 87, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.140", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "d) Granuloma venereum", "picked": null, "sampled": "a) Gonorrhoea", "options": ["d) Granuloma venereum"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:36.842806+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 88, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.51", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Social & Preventive Medicine\n\nPre-exposure prophylaxis for rabies is given on days\n\na) 0, 3, 7, 14, 28, 90\nb) 0, 3, 7, 28, 90\nc) 0, 3\nd) 0, 7, 28"}], "sampled": ["d) 0, 7, 28"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:36.938852+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 89, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.51", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "d) 0, 7, 28", "picked": "d) 0, 7, 28", "sampled": "d) 0, 7, 28", "options": ["d) 0, 7, 28"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:36.938893+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 90, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.188", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Pathology\n\nMediastinal lymph node calcification is seen in which one of the following-\n\na) Metastatic neoplasm\nb) Lymphoma\nc) Sarcoidosis\nd) Bronchiectasis"}], "sampled": ["c) Sarcoidosis"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:37.257183+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 91, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.188", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "c) Sarcoidosis", "picked": "c) Sarcoidosis", "sampled": "c) Sarcoidosis", "options": ["c) Sarcoidosis"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:37.257225+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 92, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.104", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Pathology\n\nA 28 year old female teacher is found to have a prolonged bleeding time and normal platelet count. She had a bleeding of \"easy bleeding\" with frequent bleeding of the gums, epistaxis, cutaneous bleeding and menorrhagia, further testing revealed a deficiency of Von willebrand factor. Which of the following thrombogenic processes involving platelets is most directly impaired?\n\na) Adhesion\nb) Aggregation\nc) Formation of fibrinogen bridges\nd) Conformational change with activation of phospholipid surface"}], "sampled": ["a) Adhesion"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:37.347802+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 93, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.104", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) Adhesion", "picked": "a) Adhesion", "sampled": "a) Adhesion", "options": ["a) Adhesion"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:37.347862+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 94, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.151", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Pathology\n\nTest used for factor VIII deficiency identification is-\n\na) PT\nb) APTT\nc) D dimer\nd) FDP"}], "sampled": ["b) APTT"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:37.381585+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 95, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.151", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "b) APTT", "picked": "b) APTT", "sampled": "b) APTT", "options": ["b) APTT"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:37.381641+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 96, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.197", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Pharmacology\n\nSchizophrenia is treated by:\n\na) Anti depressants\nb) Anti psychotics\nc) Anti epileptics\nd) Mood stabilizers"}], "sampled": ["b) Anti psychotics"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:37.542167+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 97, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.197", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "b) Anti psychotics", "picked": "b) Anti psychotics", "sampled": "b) Anti psychotics", "options": ["b) Anti psychotics"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:37.542212+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 98, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.68", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Physiology\n\nWhich of the following is measured by the device, Bellow's spirometer?\n\na) TLC\nb) RV\nc) Closing volume\nd) ERV"}], "sampled": ["d) ERV"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:37.664905+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 99, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.68", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "d) ERV", "picked": "d) ERV", "sampled": "d) ERV", "options": ["d) ERV"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:37.664943+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 100, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.190", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Social & Preventive Medicine\n\nThe number of doses recommended for oral Ty21a typhoid vaccine is:\n\na) 14\nb) 5\nc) 3\nd) 1"}], "sampled": ["c) 3"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:37.972402+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 101, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.190", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "c) 3", "picked": "c) 3", "sampled": "c) 3", "options": ["c) 3"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:37.972433+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 102, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.138", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Medicine\n\nInvestigations in a clinically suspected case of tuberculosis -\n\na) Mantoux (in children)\nb) Sputum AFB\nc) Bactec\nd) All of the above"}], "sampled": ["d) All of the above"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:37.986471+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 103, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.138", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "d) All of the above", "picked": "d) All of the above", "sampled": "d) All of the above", "options": ["d) All of the above"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:37.986508+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 104, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.253", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Social & Preventive Medicine\n\nDrug of choice for Falciparum Malaria is:-\n\na) Chloroquine\nb) Mefloquine\nc) ACT\nd) Proguanil"}], "sampled": ["c) ACT"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:38.346905+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 105, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.253", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "c) ACT", "picked": "c) ACT", "sampled": "c) ACT", "options": ["c) ACT"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:38.346970+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 106, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.142", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Ophthalmology\n\nGrave's ophthalmopathy mostly presents as September 2010\n\na) Proptosis\nb) Ptosis\nc) Reduced intraocular tension\nd) Increased power of convergence"}], "sampled": ["a) Proptosis"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:38.372424+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 107, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.142", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) Proptosis", "picked": "a) Proptosis", "sampled": "a) Proptosis", "options": ["a) Proptosis"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:38.372463+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 108, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.1", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Biochemistry\n\nWhich vitamin is supplied from only animal source:\n\na) Vitamin C\nb) Vitamin B7\nc) Vitamin B12\nd) Vitamin D"}], "sampled": ["c) Vitamin B12"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:38.623562+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 109, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.1", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "c) Vitamin B12", "picked": "c) Vitamin B12", "sampled": "c) Vitamin B12", "options": ["c) Vitamin B12"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:38.623610+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 110, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.189", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Ophthalmology\n\n\"Candle-wax spots\" in the retina are present in\n\na) Sarcoidosis\nb) Toxoplasmosis\nc) Syphilis\nd) Tuberculosis"}], "sampled": ["a) Sarcoidosis"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:38.676620+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 111, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.189", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) Sarcoidosis", "picked": "a) Sarcoidosis", "sampled": "a) Sarcoidosis", "options": ["a) Sarcoidosis"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:38.676657+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 112, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.62", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Orthopaedics\n\nPosition of limb in posterior dislocation of hip -\n\na) Flexion, abduction & external rotation\nb) Flexion, adduction & internal rotation\nc) Flexion, adduction & external rotation\nd) Flexion, abduction & internal rotation"}], "sampled": ["b) Flexion, adduction & internal rotation"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:39.602739+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 113, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.62", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "b) Flexion, adduction & internal rotation", "picked": "b) Flexion, adduction & internal rotation", "sampled": "b) Flexion, adduction & internal rotation", "options": ["b) Flexion, adduction & internal rotation"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:39.602783+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 114, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.53", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Forensic Medicine\n\nBest indicator of antemoum drowning is :\n\na) Froth in mouth and nostrils\nb) Cutis anserina\nc) Washerman's hand\nd) Water in nose"}], "sampled": ["a) Froth in mouth and nostrils"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:39.632152+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 115, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.53", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) Froth in mouth and nostrils", "picked": "a) Froth in mouth and nostrils", "sampled": "a) Froth in mouth and nostrils", "options": ["a) Froth in mouth and nostrils"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:39.632189+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 116, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.166", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Anatomy\n\nWhich statement best describes the cranial fossa?\n\na) The middle cranial fossa contains the cribriform plate.\nb) The anterior cranial fossa contains the pituitary gland.\nc) The middle cranial fossa is floored by the sphenoid and temporal bones.\nd) The internal acoustic meatus lies in the middle cranial fossa."}], "sampled": ["c) The middle cranial fossa is floored by the sphenoid and temporal bones."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:39.918494+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 117, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.166", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "c) The middle cranial fossa is floored by the sphenoid and temporal bones.", "picked": "c) The middle cranial fossa is floored by the sphenoid and temporal bones.", "sampled": "c) The middle cranial fossa is floored by the sphenoid and temporal bones.", "options": ["c) The middle cranial fossa is floored by the sphenoid and temporal bones."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:39.918533+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 118, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.226", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Medicine\n\nA 74-year-old woman develops occipital headache, vomiting, and dizziness. She looks unwell, her blood pressure is 180/100 mm Hg, pulse is 70/min, and respirations are 30/min. She is unable to sit or walk because of unsteadiness. Over the next few hours, she develops a decline in her level of consciousness.For the above patient with altered level of consciousness, select the most likely diagnosis.\n\na) basal ganglia hemorrhage\nb) cerebellar hemorrhage\nc) pontine hemorrhage\nd) lobar intracerebral hemorrhage"}], "sampled": ["b) cerebellar hemorrhage"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:39.992784+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 119, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.226", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "b) cerebellar hemorrhage", "picked": "b) cerebellar hemorrhage", "sampled": "b) cerebellar hemorrhage", "options": ["b) cerebellar hemorrhage"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:39.992869+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 120, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.98", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Forensic Medicine\n\nFor exhumation the order should be passed by -\n\na) Chief judicial magistrate\nb) Executive magistrate\nc) Police officer\nd) Session judge"}], "sampled": ["a) Chief judicial magistrate"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:40.215626+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 121, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.98", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "b) Executive magistrate", "picked": null, "sampled": "a) Chief judicial magistrate", "options": ["b) Executive magistrate"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:40.215708+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 122, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.230", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Surgery\n\nTrendlenburg's test done for varicose veins is for detection of:\n\na) Perforator in competency\nb) Deep veins patency\nc) Saphenofemoral incompetency\nd) Site of perforators"}], "sampled": ["c) Saphenofemoral incompetency"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:40.250676+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 123, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.230", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "c) Saphenofemoral incompetency", "picked": "c) Saphenofemoral incompetency", "sampled": "c) Saphenofemoral incompetency", "options": ["c) Saphenofemoral incompetency"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:40.250711+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 124, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.84", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Surgery\n\nDuring extraction of the upper first molar, the mesio buccal root is missing and is suspected to have been pushed into the maxillary sinus.\nThe best position for the patient immediately after the incident is\n\na) To position the patient upright\nb) To position the patients in a semi inclined posture to visualize the perforation\nc) Trendelenberg position\nd) Reverse trendelenberg position"}], "sampled": ["a) To position the patient upright"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:40.276934+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 125, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.84", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) To position the patient upright", "picked": "a) To position the patient upright", "sampled": "a) To position the patient upright", "options": ["a) To position the patient upright"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:40.276965+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 126, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.61", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Medicine\n\nS2 is best appreciated in -\n\na) 3rd left intercostal space\nb) 2nd right intercostal space\nc) 4th left intercostal space\nd) 5th left intercostal space"}], "sampled": ["b) 2nd right intercostal space"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:40.753330+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 127, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.61", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "a) 3rd left intercostal space", "picked": null, "sampled": "b) 2nd right intercostal space", "options": ["a) 3rd left intercostal space"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:40.753367+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 128, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.88", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Pathology\n\nHamartomatous lung tissue is?\n\na) Hypoplasia of lung\nb) Congenital cyst\nc) Lobar sequestration\nd) Congenital cystic adenomatoid malformation"}], "sampled": ["c) Lobar sequestration"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:41.224387+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 129, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.88", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "d) Congenital cystic adenomatoid malformation", "picked": null, "sampled": "c) Lobar sequestration", "options": ["d) Congenital cystic adenomatoid malformation"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:41.224425+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 130, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.114", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Surgery\n\nAll are true about Cancer breast, except:\n\na) Affected sibling is a risk factor\nb) Paget's disease of nipple is intraductal type of CA\nc) Common in aged nulliparous\nd) Increased incidence with prolonged breast feeding"}], "sampled": ["d) Increased incidence with prolonged breast feeding"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:41.520271+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 131, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.114", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "d) Increased incidence with prolonged breast feeding", "picked": "d) Increased incidence with prolonged breast feeding", "sampled": "d) Increased incidence with prolonged breast feeding", "options": ["d) Increased incidence with prolonged breast feeding"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:41.520332+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 132, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.29", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Anatomy\n\nLymph vessel which drain the posterior 1/3 rd of the tongue:\n\na) Basal vessel.\nb) Marginal vessel.\nc) Central vessel.\nd) Lateral vessel."}], "sampled": ["a) Basal vessel."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:41.810507+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 133, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.29", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) Basal vessel.", "picked": "a) Basal vessel.", "sampled": "a) Basal vessel.", "options": ["a) Basal vessel."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:41.810555+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 134, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.129", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Surgery\n\nA 60 yr old chronic smoker presents with painless gross hematuria of 1 day duration. Which is the investigation of choice to know the cause of hematuria?\n\na) USG\nb) X-ray KUB\nc) Urine routine\nd) Urine microscopy for malignant cytology cells"}], "sampled": ["a) USG"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:42.165198+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 135, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.129", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "d) Urine microscopy for malignant cytology cells", "picked": null, "sampled": "a) USG", "options": ["d) Urine microscopy for malignant cytology cells"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:42.165249+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 136, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.239", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Social & Preventive Medicine\n\nProposed guideline value for Radioactivity in drinking water is:\n\na) Gross a activity 0.1 Bq/L and Gross b activity 1.0 Bq/L\nb) Gross a activity 1.0 Bq/L adn Gross b activity 0.1 Bq/L\nc) Gross a activity 1.0 Bq/L and Gross b activity 10.0 Bq/L\nd) Gross a activity 10 Bq/L and Gross b activity 1.0 Bq/L"}], "sampled": ["a) Gross a activity 0.1 Bq/L and Gross b activity 1.0 Bq/L"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:42.340222+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 137, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.239", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) Gross a activity 0.1 Bq/L and Gross b activity 1.0 Bq/L", "picked": "a) Gross a activity 0.1 Bq/L and Gross b activity 1.0 Bq/L", "sampled": "a) Gross a activity 0.1 Bq/L and Gross b activity 1.0 Bq/L", "options": ["a) Gross a activity 0.1 Bq/L and Gross b activity 1.0 Bq/L"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:42.340281+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 138, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.159", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Anaesthesia\n\nRole of egg lecithin in propofol formulation is?\n\na) Acts as emulsifying agent\nb) Acts as preservative\nc) Acts as carrier vehicle\nd) Acts as antibacterial"}], "sampled": ["a) Acts as emulsifying agent"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:42.447240+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 139, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.159", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) Acts as emulsifying agent", "picked": "a) Acts as emulsifying agent", "sampled": "a) Acts as emulsifying agent", "options": ["a) Acts as emulsifying agent"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:42.447295+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 140, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.117", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Medicine\n\nAntiboiotic Prophylaxis for infective endocarditis is indicated in:\n\na) Isolated secundum ASD\nb) Mitral valve prolapse without regurgitation\nc) Prior coronary aery bypass graft\nd) Coarctation of aoa"}], "sampled": ["b) Mitral valve prolapse without regurgitation"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:42.482038+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 141, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.117", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "d) Coarctation of aoa", "picked": null, "sampled": "b) Mitral valve prolapse without regurgitation", "options": ["d) Coarctation of aoa"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:42.482102+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 142, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.76", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Ophthalmology\n\nHypersecretory glaucoma is seen in –\n\na) Epidemic dropsy\nb) Marfan's syndrome\nc) Hypertension\nd) Diabetes"}], "sampled": ["a) Epidemic dropsy"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:42.545466+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 143, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.76", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) Epidemic dropsy", "picked": "a) Epidemic dropsy", "sampled": "a) Epidemic dropsy", "options": ["a) Epidemic dropsy"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:42.545509+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 144, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.77", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Medicine\n\nA 14-year-old girl presents with quadriparesis, facial palsy, winging of scapula and ptosis. There is h/o similar illness in father and brother but less severe. Her CPK level is also raised (500IU/L). She is probably suffering from?\n\na) Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy\nb) Becker muscular dystrophy\nc) Limb-girdle dystrophy\nd) Scapulofaciohumeral dystrophy"}], "sampled": ["a) Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:42.930172+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 145, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.77", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "d) Scapulofaciohumeral dystrophy", "picked": null, "sampled": "a) Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy", "options": ["d) Scapulofaciohumeral dystrophy"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:42.930206+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 146, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.263", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Pathology\n\nA 49-year-old female taking ibuprofen for increasing joint pain in her hands presents with increasing pain in her midsternal area. Gastroscopy reveals multiple, scattered, punctate hemorrhagic areas in her gastric mucosa. Biopsies from one of these hemorrhagic lesions reveal mucosal erosions with edema and hemorrhage. No mucosal ulceration is seen.\n\na) Active chronic gastritis\nb) Acute gastritis\nc) Autoimmune gastritis\nd) Chronic gastritis"}], "sampled": ["b) Acute gastritis"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:43.000697+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 147, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.263", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "b) Acute gastritis", "picked": "b) Acute gastritis", "sampled": "b) Acute gastritis", "options": ["b) Acute gastritis"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:43.000765+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 148, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.178", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Psychiatry\n\nSymptomatic treatment is not required in withdrawal of:\n\na) Cannabis\nb) Morphine\nc) Alcohol\nd) Cocaine"}], "sampled": ["a) Cannabis"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:43.352791+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 149, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.178", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) Cannabis", "picked": "a) Cannabis", "sampled": "a) Cannabis", "options": ["a) Cannabis"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:43.352829+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 150, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.50", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Social & Preventive Medicine\n\nTrue statement regarding specific death rates\n\na) Specific for age and sex\nb) Identify particular group or groups \"at risk\" for preventive action\nc) Find out cause or disease specific\nd) All of the above"}], "sampled": ["d) All of the above"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:43.699008+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 151, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.50", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "d) All of the above", "picked": "d) All of the above", "sampled": "d) All of the above", "options": ["d) All of the above"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:43.699107+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 152, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.24", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Medicine\n\nThe most common cause of renal scaring in a 3 year old child is -\n\na) Trauma\nb) Tuberculosis\nc) Vesicoureteral reflux induced pyelonephritis\nd) Interstitial nephritis"}], "sampled": ["c) Vesicoureteral reflux induced pyelonephritis"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:44.079633+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 153, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.24", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "c) Vesicoureteral reflux induced pyelonephritis", "picked": "c) Vesicoureteral reflux induced pyelonephritis", "sampled": "c) Vesicoureteral reflux induced pyelonephritis", "options": ["c) Vesicoureteral reflux induced pyelonephritis"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:44.079671+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 154, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.267", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Pathology\n\nA 40-year-old man presents with a 2-week history of recur- rent oral ulcers, genital ulcers, intermittent arthritic pain of the knees, and abdominal pain. Physical examination reveals shallow ulcerations of the mucosa of the glans penis, as well as oral aphthous ulcers and conjunctivitis. Which of the following is the most likely diagnosis?\n\na) Behyet disease\nb) Genital herpes\nc) Gonorrhea\nd) Polyarteritis nodosa"}], "sampled": ["a) Behyet disease"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:44.092588+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 155, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.267", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) Behyet disease", "picked": "a) Behyet disease", "sampled": "a) Behyet disease", "options": ["a) Behyet disease"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:44.092627+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 156, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.25", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Forensic Medicine\n\nA 6hours old snake bite patient comes to emergency with mild local edema at the injury site. On examination no abnormalities detected and lab repos are normal. Most appropriate management is\n\na) Incision and suction\nb) Wait and watch\nc) Local subcutaneous antisnake venom\nd) Intravenous antisnake venom"}], "sampled": ["d) Intravenous antisnake venom"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:44.153990+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 157, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.25", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "b) Wait and watch", "picked": null, "sampled": "d) Intravenous antisnake venom", "options": ["b) Wait and watch"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:44.154047+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 158, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.33", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Gynaecology & Obstetrics\n\nRegarding vaginal candidiasis which one of the following is false:\n\na) Cottage cheese like secretions are seen\nb) Intense pruritus\nc) Most common in non-pregnant women\nd) Buds and hyphae seen in KOH preparation"}], "sampled": ["c) Most common in non-pregnant women"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:44.576021+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 159, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.33", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "c) Most common in non-pregnant women", "picked": "c) Most common in non-pregnant women", "sampled": "c) Most common in non-pregnant women", "options": ["c) Most common in non-pregnant women"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:44.576063+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 160, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.290", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Microbiology\n\nThe process of destroying all microbes including spores is called :\n\na) Disinfection\nb) Antisepsis\nc) Asepsis\nd) Sterilization"}], "sampled": ["d) Sterilization"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:45.334935+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 161, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.290", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "d) Sterilization", "picked": "d) Sterilization", "sampled": "d) Sterilization", "options": ["d) Sterilization"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:45.334982+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 162, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.109", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Microbiology\n\nBotulinum affects all of the following, EXCEPT:\n\na) Neuromuscular junction\nb) Preganglionic junction\nc) Post ganglionic nerves\nd) CNS"}], "sampled": ["d) CNS"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:45.410869+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 163, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.109", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "d) CNS", "picked": "d) CNS", "sampled": "d) CNS", "options": ["d) CNS"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:45.410916+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 164, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.219", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Surgery\n\nBacterial pyogenic parotitis affecting the parotid gland is most common after: March 2008\n\na) Uveo-parotid fever\nb) Mumps\nc) Debilitation after major surgery\nd) After administration of iodine"}], "sampled": ["c) Debilitation after major surgery"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:45.474219+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 165, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.219", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "c) Debilitation after major surgery", "picked": "c) Debilitation after major surgery", "sampled": "c) Debilitation after major surgery", "options": ["c) Debilitation after major surgery"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:45.474254+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 166, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.265", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Pharmacology\n\nDNA dependent RNA synthesis is inhibited by:\n\na) Rifampicin\nb) Ethambutol\nc) Colchicine\nd) Chloromycetin"}], "sampled": ["a) Rifampicin"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:45.514990+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 167, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.265", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) Rifampicin", "picked": "a) Rifampicin", "sampled": "a) Rifampicin", "options": ["a) Rifampicin"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:45.515039+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 168, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.31", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Orthopaedics\n\nAll are True about Acute Osteomyelitis except\n\na) Common in children\nb) Severe pain\nc) Involves Epiphyseal plate\nd) Treatment involves 6 weeks of Antibiotics"}], "sampled": ["c) Involves Epiphyseal plate"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:45.581214+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 169, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.31", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "c) Involves Epiphyseal plate", "picked": "c) Involves Epiphyseal plate", "sampled": "c) Involves Epiphyseal plate", "options": ["c) Involves Epiphyseal plate"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:45.581249+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 170, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.269", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Biochemistry\n\nIn which phase of cell cycle, proof reading occurs?\n\na) G1\nb) S\nc) G2\nd) M"}], "sampled": ["b) S"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:45.657660+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 171, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.269", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "b) S", "picked": "b) S", "sampled": "b) S", "options": ["b) S"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:45.657728+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 172, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.181", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Microbiology\n\nStaphylococcus aureus does not cause which of the following skin infection:\n\na) Ecthyma gangrenosum\nb) Bullous impetigo\nc) Botryomycosis\nd) Cellulitis"}], "sampled": ["a) Ecthyma gangrenosum"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:45.842469+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 173, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.181", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) Ecthyma gangrenosum", "picked": "a) Ecthyma gangrenosum", "sampled": "a) Ecthyma gangrenosum", "options": ["a) Ecthyma gangrenosum"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:45.842548+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 174, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.28", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Social & Preventive Medicine\n\nWhat is the best method of informing the rural population about Oral rehydration technique: March 2013 (d, f)\n\na) Chalk and talk/Lecture\nb) Demonstrations\nc) Role play\nd) Flash cards"}], "sampled": ["b) Demonstrations"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:46.433915+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 175, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.28", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "b) Demonstrations", "picked": "b) Demonstrations", "sampled": "b) Demonstrations", "options": ["b) Demonstrations"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:46.433962+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 176, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.183", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Forensic Medicine\n\nStatuary rape is -\n\na) Less than 15 years\nb) Less than 16 years\nc) Less than 18 years\nd) Less than 20 years"}], "sampled": ["b) Less than 16 years"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:46.640218+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 177, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.183", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "c) Less than 18 years", "picked": null, "sampled": "b) Less than 16 years", "options": ["c) Less than 18 years"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:46.640271+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 178, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.112", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Forensic Medicine\n\nWhich of the following condition is necessary prerequisite for this change?\n\na) Rupture of membranes\nb) Scanty liquor amnii\nc) Adequate liquor amnii\nd) Air inside the uterine cavity"}], "sampled": ["c) Adequate liquor amnii"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:46.766032+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 179, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.112", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "c) Adequate liquor amnii", "picked": "c) Adequate liquor amnii", "sampled": "c) Adequate liquor amnii", "options": ["c) Adequate liquor amnii"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:46.766078+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 180, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.288", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Forensic Medicine\n\nHyoid bone fracture most common occurs in ?\n\na) Manual strangulation\nb) Hanging\nc) Smothering\nd) Traumatic asphyxia"}], "sampled": ["a) Manual strangulation"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:46.849175+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 181, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.288", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) Manual strangulation", "picked": "a) Manual strangulation", "sampled": "a) Manual strangulation", "options": ["a) Manual strangulation"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:46.849221+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 182, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.40", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Ophthalmology\n\nFollowing are the causes of sudden loss of vision except ?\n\na) Angle closure glaucoma\nb) Endophthalmitis\nc) Central serous retinopathy\nd) Corneal ulceration"}], "sampled": ["c) Central serous retinopathy"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:46.941609+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 183, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.40", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "d) Corneal ulceration", "picked": null, "sampled": "c) Central serous retinopathy", "options": ["d) Corneal ulceration"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:46.941657+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 184, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.270", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Biochemistry\n\nThe number of ATPs generated in krebs cycleare ?\n\na) 12\nb) 24\nc) 15\nd) 30"}], "sampled": ["b) 24"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:47.196860+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 185, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.270", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "b) 24", "picked": "b) 24", "sampled": "b) 24", "options": ["b) 24"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:47.196956+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 186, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.268", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Pharmacology\n\nAbout biotransformation not true ?\n\na) Active metabolite generation\nb) Polar to less polar\nc) Less polar to more polar\nd) Generate active drug from prodrug"}], "sampled": ["b) Polar to less polar"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:47.398738+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 187, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.268", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "b) Polar to less polar", "picked": "b) Polar to less polar", "sampled": "b) Polar to less polar", "options": ["b) Polar to less polar"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:47.398793+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 188, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.71", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Physiology\n\nThe WBC that is considered “second line of defence” is:\n\na) Neutrophil\nb) Eosinophil\nc) Basophil\nd) Monocyte"}], "sampled": ["a) Neutrophil"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:47.877104+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 189, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.71", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "d) Monocyte", "picked": null, "sampled": "a) Neutrophil", "options": ["d) Monocyte"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:47.877160+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 190, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.257", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Social & Preventive Medicine\n\nNeuro lathyrism results due to\n\na) Aflatoxin\nb) Pyruvic acid\nc) BOAA\nd) Sanguinarine"}], "sampled": ["c) BOAA"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:48.066981+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 191, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.257", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "c) BOAA", "picked": "c) BOAA", "sampled": "c) BOAA", "options": ["c) BOAA"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:48.067032+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 192, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.13", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Microbiology\n\nTrue regarding lag phase is?\n\na) Time taken to adpt in the new environment\nb) Growth occurs exponentially\nc) The plateau in lag phase is due to cell death\nd) It is the 2nd phase in bacterial growth curve"}], "sampled": ["a) Time taken to adpt in the new environment"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:48.311286+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 193, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.13", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) Time taken to adpt in the new environment", "picked": "a) Time taken to adpt in the new environment", "sampled": "a) Time taken to adpt in the new environment", "options": ["a) Time taken to adpt in the new environment"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:48.311327+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 194, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.66", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Anatomy\n\nAll of the following structure lies outside the cavernous sinus except\n\na) Sphenoidal air sinus\nb) Internal carotid aery\nc) Foramen lacerum\nd) Maxillary nerve"}], "sampled": ["b) Internal carotid artery"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:48.788416+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 195, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.66", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "d) Maxillary nerve", "picked": null, "sampled": "b) Internal carotid artery", "options": ["d) Maxillary nerve"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:48.788465+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 196, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.205", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Dental\n\nTwo or more parallel vertical surfaces of abutment teeth shaped to direct the prosthesis during placement and removal, are known as:\n\na) Orientation plane\nb) Parallel block out\nc) Survey lines\nd) Guiding planes"}], "sampled": ["d) Guiding planes"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:48.825891+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 197, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.205", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "d) Guiding planes", "picked": "d) Guiding planes", "sampled": "d) Guiding planes", "options": ["d) Guiding planes"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:48.825961+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 198, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.279", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Pharmacology\n\nWhich of the following drugs is antipseudomonal penicillin?\n\na) Cephalexin\nb) Dicloxacillin\nc) Piperacillin\nd) Cloxacillin"}], "sampled": ["c) Piperacillin"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:48.855572+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 199, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.279", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "c) Piperacillin", "picked": "c) Piperacillin", "sampled": "c) Piperacillin", "options": ["c) Piperacillin"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:48.855618+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 200, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.145", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Dental\n\nDimension stability of hydrocollids may be achieved by\n\na) optimizing w:p\nb) using cold water\nc) prolonged manipulation\nd) using humidor"}], "sampled": ["b) using cold water"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:48.883553+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 201, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.145", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "d) using humidor", "picked": null, "sampled": "b) using cold water", "options": ["d) using humidor"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:48.883642+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 202, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.157", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Gynaecology & Obstetrics\n\nSho structured primi gravida has height less then\n\na) 140 cm\nb) 145 cm\nc) 150 cm\nd) 135 cm"}], "sampled": ["a) 140 cm"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:48.929551+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 203, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.157", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) 140 cm", "picked": "a) 140 cm", "sampled": "a) 140 cm", "options": ["a) 140 cm"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:48.929587+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 204, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.177", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Medicine\n\nA patient with cushinoid features presents with hemoptysis; he shows no response to dexamethasone suppression test; most likely diagnosis here is:\n\na) Adrenal hyperplasia\nb) Adrenal adenoma\nc) Ca lung with ectopic ACTH production\nd) Pituitary microadenoma"}], "sampled": ["c) Ca lung with ectopic ACTH production"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:49.087496+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 205, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.177", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "c) Ca lung with ectopic ACTH production", "picked": "c) Ca lung with ectopic ACTH production", "sampled": "c) Ca lung with ectopic ACTH production", "options": ["c) Ca lung with ectopic ACTH production"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:49.087541+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 206, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.243", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Pediatrics\n\nIn RDS all of the following statements are true except\n\na) Usually occurs in infants born before 34 weeks of gestation\nb) Is more common in babies born to diabetic mothers\nc) Leads to cyanosis\nd) Is treated by administering 100% oxygen"}], "sampled": ["d) Is treated by administering 100% oxygen"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:49.192489+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 207, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.243", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "d) Is treated by administering 100% oxygen", "picked": "d) Is treated by administering 100% oxygen", "sampled": "d) Is treated by administering 100% oxygen", "options": ["d) Is treated by administering 100% oxygen"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:49.192556+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 208, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.207", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Anaesthesia\n\nWhich of the following statements about Total Infra–Venous Anaesthesia (TIVA) is true –\n\na) Causes More Renal Toxicity\nb) Reduces Cerebral Metabolic Rate\nc) Risk of Malignant Hyperthermia is high\nd) Inhibits Hypoxic Pulmonary Vasconstriction"}], "sampled": ["b) Reduces Cerebral Metabolic Rate"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:49.829862+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 209, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.207", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "b) Reduces Cerebral Metabolic Rate", "picked": "b) Reduces Cerebral Metabolic Rate", "sampled": "b) Reduces Cerebral Metabolic Rate", "options": ["b) Reduces Cerebral Metabolic Rate"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:49.829909+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 210, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.115", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Biochemistry\n\nWhich of the following vitamin reduces the risk of insulin resistance, obesity, and the metabolic syndrome?\n\na) Vitamin A\nb) Vitamin C\nc) Vitamin D\nd) Vitamin B12"}], "sampled": ["c) Vitamin D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:50.000630+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 211, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.115", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "c) Vitamin D", "picked": "c) Vitamin D", "sampled": "c) Vitamin D", "options": ["c) Vitamin D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:50.000688+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 212, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.254", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Ophthalmology\n\nAll are causes of white-dot syndrome except:\n\na) Fuch's heterochromic uveitis\nb) VKH syndrome\nc) HIV retinopathy\nd) Sympathetic ophthalmitis"}], "sampled": ["c) HIV retinopathy"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:50.271321+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 213, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.254", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "d) Sympathetic ophthalmitis", "picked": null, "sampled": "c) HIV retinopathy", "options": ["d) Sympathetic ophthalmitis"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:50.271370+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 214, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.91", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: ENT\n\nIn caloric test, cold water stimulation causes movement of eye -\n\na) Some side\nb) Opposite side\nc) Up\nd) Do\\vn"}], "sampled": ["a) Some side"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:50.376518+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 215, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.91", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "b) Opposite side", "picked": null, "sampled": "a) Some side", "options": ["b) Opposite side"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:50.376566+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 216, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.121", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Dental\n\nSecondary retention for a removable partial denture is provided by\n\na) The indirect retainer\nb) The direct retainer\nc) Intimate contact between the denture bases and the underlying tissues\nd) Direct and indirect retainers"}], "sampled": ["a) The indirect retainer"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:50.453205+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 217, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.121", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "c) Intimate contact between the denture bases and the underlying tissues", "picked": null, "sampled": "a) The indirect retainer", "options": ["c) Intimate contact between the denture bases and the underlying tissues"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:50.453242+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 218, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.38", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Dental\n\nIf solid line represent the rigid height, then the following diagram with excessive inter arch space is classified in?\n\na) Class - 1\nb) Class - 2\nc) Class - 3\nd) Class - 4"}], "sampled": ["b) Class - 2"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:50.570014+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 219, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.38", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "b) Class - 2", "picked": "b) Class - 2", "sampled": "b) Class - 2", "options": ["b) Class - 2"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:50.570062+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 220, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.54", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Pathology\n\nSplenomegaly may be a feature of: March 2013\n\na) Megaloblastic anemia\nb) Sickle cell anemia\nc) Thalassemia\nd) G6PD deficiency"}], "sampled": ["b) Sickle cell anemia"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:50.589690+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 221, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.54", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "b) Sickle cell anemia", "picked": "b) Sickle cell anemia", "sampled": "b) Sickle cell anemia", "options": ["b) Sickle cell anemia"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:50.589741+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 222, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.232", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Biochemistry\n\nSpecific poison for succinate dehydrogenase is ?\n\na) Cyanide\nb) Malonate\nc) Arsenite\nd) Fluoride"}], "sampled": ["b) Malonate"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:50.893262+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 223, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.232", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "b) Malonate", "picked": "b) Malonate", "sampled": "b) Malonate", "options": ["b) Malonate"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:50.893309+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 224, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.186", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Social & Preventive Medicine\n\nChemoprophylaxis is indicated for all except-\n\na) Typhoid\nb) Meningococcal meningitis\nc) Cholera\nd) Plague"}], "sampled": ["c) Cholera"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:51.409029+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 225, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.186", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "a) Typhoid", "picked": null, "sampled": "c) Cholera", "options": ["a) Typhoid"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:51.409077+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 226, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.173", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Biochemistry\n\nIn a patient with a type of familial dyslipidemias he presented with palmar Xanthomas and he ias at increased risk of atherosclerosis and CAD.In Lipid profile there was elevation of triacylglycerols and cholesterol.And the IDL and chylomicrons were elevated.What is the pathophysiology of the condition?\n\na) LDL deficiency\nb) VLDL overproduction\nc) Apo C-2 deficiency\nd) Apo E deficiency"}], "sampled": ["d) Apo E deficiency"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:51.494876+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 227, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.173", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "d) Apo E deficiency", "picked": "d) Apo E deficiency", "sampled": "d) Apo E deficiency", "options": ["d) Apo E deficiency"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:51.494921+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 228, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.92", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Social & Preventive Medicine\n\nWhich of the following is not false about annual risk of TB\n\na) ARI of 1% = 75 new cases\nb) Current ARI in India is 1.7%\nc) It is represents new cases of TB\nd) It is assessed by tuberculin conversion in previously non-vaccinated children"}], "sampled": ["b) Current ARI in India is 1.7%"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:51.500046+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 229, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.92", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "d) It is assessed by tuberculin conversion in previously non-vaccinated children", "picked": null, "sampled": "b) Current ARI in India is 1.7%", "options": ["d) It is assessed by tuberculin conversion in previously non-vaccinated children"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:51.500082+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 230, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.292", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Physiology\n\nMost sensitive nerve fiber to hypoxia\n\na) A\nb) B\nc) C\nd) All are equally sensitive"}], "sampled": ["a) A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:51.616245+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 231, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.292", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "b) B", "picked": null, "sampled": "a) A", "options": ["b) B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:51.616286+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 232, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.245", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Medicine\n\nAll of the following are ACTH independent Cushing syndrome except :\n\na) Pituitary adenoma\nb) Adrenal hyperplasia\nc) Adrenocoical carcinoma\nd) McCune Albright Syndrome"}], "sampled": ["a) Pituitary adenoma"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:51.898212+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 233, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.245", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) Pituitary adenoma", "picked": "a) Pituitary adenoma", "sampled": "a) Pituitary adenoma", "options": ["a) Pituitary adenoma"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:51.898254+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 234, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.17", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Social & Preventive Medicine\n\nFor a positively skewed curve which measure of central tendency is largest\n\na) Mean\nb) Mode\nc) Median\nd) All are equal"}], "sampled": ["a) Mean"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:51.957734+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 235, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.17", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) Mean", "picked": "a) Mean", "sampled": "a) Mean", "options": ["a) Mean"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:51.957771+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 236, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.278", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Pharmacology\n\nPimozide belongs to class of:\n\na) Thiothixanthene\nb) Phenothiazine\nc) Butyrophenone\nd) Diphenyl butyl piperidine"}], "sampled": ["c) Butyrophenone"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:52.476585+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 237, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.278", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "d) Diphenyl butyl piperidine", "picked": null, "sampled": "c) Butyrophenone", "options": ["d) Diphenyl butyl piperidine"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:52.476632+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 238, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.57", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Biochemistry\n\nAll of the following could include the mechanism or function of oxigenases, EXCEPT:\n\na) Incorporate 2 atoms of oxygen\nb) Incorporate 1 atom of oxygen\nc) Required for hydroxylation of steroids\nd) Required for carboxylation of drugs"}], "sampled": ["d) Required for carboxylation of drugs"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:52.522683+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 239, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.57", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "d) Required for carboxylation of drugs", "picked": "d) Required for carboxylation of drugs", "sampled": "d) Required for carboxylation of drugs", "options": ["d) Required for carboxylation of drugs"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:52.522717+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 240, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.155", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Pediatrics\n\nAsymmetric tonic neck reflex (ATNR) disappears at ______\n\na) 6 months\nb) 5 months\nc) 9 months\nd) 8 months"}], "sampled": ["a) 6 months"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:52.755602+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 241, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.155", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) 6 months", "picked": "a) 6 months", "sampled": "a) 6 months", "options": ["a) 6 months"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:52.755660+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 242, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.179", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Forensic Medicine\n\nFollowing death of a person, what happens to potassium level in the vitreous.\n\na) Potassium level falls\nb) Potassium level increases\nc) Remains unchanged\nd) It depends on cause of death"}], "sampled": ["b) Potassium level increases"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:52.971920+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 243, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.179", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "b) Potassium level increases", "picked": "b) Potassium level increases", "sampled": "b) Potassium level increases", "options": ["b) Potassium level increases"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:52.971951+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 244, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.75", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Pediatrics\n\nAll of the following are causes of congenital blindness Except\n\na) Toxoplasmosis\nb) Congenital rubella\nc) Vitamin A deficiency\nd) Cataract"}], "sampled": ["c) Vitamin A deficiency"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:52.979511+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 245, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.75", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "c) Vitamin A deficiency", "picked": "c) Vitamin A deficiency", "sampled": "c) Vitamin A deficiency", "options": ["c) Vitamin A deficiency"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:52.979574+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 246, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.250", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Skin\n\nA 7 years old boy presented with painful boggy swelling of scalp, multiple sinuses with purulent discharge, easily pluckable hairs and lymph nodes enlarged in occipital region. Which one of the following would be most helpful for diagnostic evaluation?\n\na) Bacterial culture\nb) Biopsy\nc) KOH mount\nd) Patch test"}], "sampled": ["c) KOH mount"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:53.009163+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 247, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.250", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "c) KOH mount", "picked": "c) KOH mount", "sampled": "c) KOH mount", "options": ["c) KOH mount"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:53.009195+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 248, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.266", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Surgery\n\nIliac crest involvement is common in which condition: March 2007\n\na) Ankylosing spondylitis\nb) Rheumatoid ahritis\nc) Reiter's syndrome\nd) Osteoahritis"}], "sampled": ["a) Ankylosing spondylitis"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:53.236911+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 249, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.266", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) Ankylosing spondylitis", "picked": "a) Ankylosing spondylitis", "sampled": "a) Ankylosing spondylitis", "options": ["a) Ankylosing spondylitis"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:53.236958+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 250, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.102", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Surgery\n\nPotter syndrome is not assoiated with\n\na) Bilateral renal agenesis\nb) Bilateral multicystic kidney disease\nc) oligohydromnios\nd) Polyhydromnios"}], "sampled": ["d) Polyhydromnios"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:53.503549+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 251, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.102", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "a) Bilateral renal agenesis", "picked": null, "sampled": "d) Polyhydromnios", "options": ["a) Bilateral renal agenesis"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:53.503597+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 252, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.42", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Anatomy\n\nDuring Sx for meningioma, the left paracentral lobule was injured. It would lead to paresis of\n\na) Rt. Leg and perineus\nb) Left face\nc) Right face\nd) Right shoulder & trunk"}], "sampled": ["a) Rt. Leg and perineus"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:53.664324+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 253, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.42", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) Rt. Leg and perineus", "picked": "a) Rt. Leg and perineus", "sampled": "a) Rt. Leg and perineus", "options": ["a) Rt. Leg and perineus"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:53.664396+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 254, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.294", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Pharmacology\n\nMetoprolol is preferred over Propranolol as it: September 2010\n\na) Is more potent in blocking beta-1 receptors\nb) Is more potent in blocking beta-2 receptors\nc) Is more effective in suppressing essential tremors\nd) Impairs exercise capacity"}], "sampled": ["a) Is more potent in blocking beta-1 receptors"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:53.727737+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 255, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.294", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) Is more potent in blocking beta-1 receptors", "picked": "a) Is more potent in blocking beta-1 receptors", "sampled": "a) Is more potent in blocking beta-1 receptors", "options": ["a) Is more potent in blocking beta-1 receptors"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:53.727775+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 256, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.30", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Anaesthesia\n\nRisk factors associated with post-operative nausea and vomiting following strabismus surgery are all except -\n\na) Age < 3years\nb) Duration of anesthesia > 30 mins\nc) Personal or family history of post - op nausea and vomiting\nd) Personal or family history of motion sickness"}], "sampled": ["a) Age < 3years"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:53.953671+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 257, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.30", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) Age < 3years", "picked": "a) Age < 3years", "sampled": "a) Age < 3years", "options": ["a) Age < 3years"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:53.953711+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 258, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.74", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Surgery\n\nAn Isograft indicates transfer of tissues between -\n\na) Unrelated donors\nb) Related donors\nc) Monozygotic twins\nd) From the same individual"}], "sampled": ["c) Monozygotic twins"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:54.363077+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 259, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.74", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "c) Monozygotic twins", "picked": "c) Monozygotic twins", "sampled": "c) Monozygotic twins", "options": ["c) Monozygotic twins"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:54.363118+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 260, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.201", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Unknown\n\nAntibodies associated with GTCS in SLE :\n\na) Anti neuronal ab\nb) Anti-Ro ab\nc) Anti-Sm ab\nd) None"}], "sampled": ["c) Anti-Sm ab"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:54.915826+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 261, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.201", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "a) Anti neuronal ab", "picked": null, "sampled": "c) Anti-Sm ab", "options": ["a) Anti neuronal ab"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:54.915872+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 262, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.14", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Surgery\n\nA 60 yr old chronic smoker presents with painless gross hematuria of 1 day duration. Investigation of choice to know the cause of hematuria\n\na) USG\nb) X-ray KUB\nc) Urine routine\nd) Urine microscopy for malignant cytology cells"}], "sampled": ["a) USG"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:55.483687+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 263, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.14", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "d) Urine microscopy for malignant cytology cells", "picked": null, "sampled": "a) USG", "options": ["d) Urine microscopy for malignant cytology cells"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:55.483749+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 264, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.94", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Skin\n\nIgA deposits on skin biopsy\n\na) Henoch Schouleiln puspura\nb) Giant cell aeritis\nc) Microscopic polyangitis\nd) Wegener's granulomatosis"}], "sampled": ["a) Henoch Schouleiln puspura"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:55.484323+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 265, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.94", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) Henoch Schouleiln puspura", "picked": "a) Henoch Schouleiln puspura", "sampled": "a) Henoch Schouleiln puspura", "options": ["a) Henoch Schouleiln puspura"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:55.484368+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 266, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.212", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Medicine\n\nOne of the constituents of the commonly used metered dose inhalers in bronchial asthma which is an air pollutant & dangerous to earth's stratosphere is -\n\na) Flurocarbons\nb) Salbutamol\nc) Ozone\nd) Oxygen"}], "sampled": ["a) Flurocarbons"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:55.688099+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 267, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.212", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) Flurocarbons", "picked": "a) Flurocarbons", "sampled": "a) Flurocarbons", "options": ["a) Flurocarbons"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:55.688157+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 268, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.37", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Orthopaedics\n\nWhat change will be seen in vertebral column in ochronosis-\n\na) Calcification of disc\nb) Bamboo spine\nc) Increased disc space\nd) None"}], "sampled": ["a) Calcification of disc"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:56.074253+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 269, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.37", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) Calcification of disc", "picked": "a) Calcification of disc", "sampled": "a) Calcification of disc", "options": ["a) Calcification of disc"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:56.074300+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 270, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.32", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Orthopaedics\n\nAnterolateral ahroscopy of knee is for:\n\na) To see patellofemoral aiculation\nb) To see the posterior cruciate ligament\nc) To see the anterior poion of lateral meniscus\nd) To see the periphery of the posterior horn of medial meniscus"}], "sampled": ["c) To see the anterior portion of lateral meniscus"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:56.248597+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 271, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.32", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "a) To see patellofemoral aiculation", "picked": null, "sampled": "c) To see the anterior portion of lateral meniscus", "options": ["a) To see patellofemoral aiculation"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:56.248646+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 272, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.132", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Anatomy\n\nCongestive hea failure in an infant is characterized by all except\n\na) Pedal edema\nb) Tachypnea\nc) Sweating\nd) Poor weight gain"}], "sampled": ["a) Pedal edema"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:56.258137+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 273, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.132", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) Pedal edema", "picked": "a) Pedal edema", "sampled": "a) Pedal edema", "options": ["a) Pedal edema"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:56.258176+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 274, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.60", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Social & Preventive Medicine\n\nPrevalence is a:\n\na) Rate\nb) Ratio\nc) Propoion\nd) None of the above"}], "sampled": ["c) Propoion"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:56.264871+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 275, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.60", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "c) Propoion", "picked": "c) Propoion", "sampled": "c) Propoion", "options": ["c) Propoion"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:56.264909+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 276, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.78", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Ophthalmology\n\nWhich of the following is true statement regarding human eye\n\na) Cornea cut off wavelength upto 400 nm\nb) Normal eye medium will permit wavelength of 400- 700 nm\nc) Even after cataract surgery UV rays are not penetrated\nd) Lens will not reflect light"}], "sampled": ["b) Normal eye medium will permit wavelength of 400- 700 nm"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:56.298593+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 277, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.78", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "b) Normal eye medium will permit wavelength of 400- 700 nm", "picked": "b) Normal eye medium will permit wavelength of 400- 700 nm", "sampled": "b) Normal eye medium will permit wavelength of 400- 700 nm", "options": ["b) Normal eye medium will permit wavelength of 400- 700 nm"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:56.298629+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 278, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.36", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Pediatrics\n\nFor TOF management in antenatal period includes ?\n\na) Balloon valvotomy\nb) Open hea surgery\nc) Karyotyping\nd) Aspirin"}], "sampled": ["c) Karyotyping"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:56.598027+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 279, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.36", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "c) Karyotyping", "picked": "c) Karyotyping", "sampled": "c) Karyotyping", "options": ["c) Karyotyping"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:56.598077+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 280, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.20", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Surgery\n\nTesticular artery usually arises from\n\na) Abdominal aorta below renal artery\nb) Renal artery\nc) Internal iliac artery\nd) Ext iliac artery"}], "sampled": ["a) Abdominal aorta below renal artery"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:56.605881+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 281, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.20", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) Abdominal aorta below renal artery", "picked": "a) Abdominal aorta below renal artery", "sampled": "a) Abdominal aorta below renal artery", "options": ["a) Abdominal aorta below renal artery"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:56.605927+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 282, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.167", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Biochemistry\n\nWhich of the following vitamin enhances intestinal absorption of calcium?\n\na) Vitamin D\nb) Vitamin K\nc) Vitamin B1\nd) Vitamin B2"}], "sampled": ["a) Vitamin D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:56.688663+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 283, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.167", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) Vitamin D", "picked": "a) Vitamin D", "sampled": "a) Vitamin D", "options": ["a) Vitamin D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:56.688702+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 284, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.238", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Radiology\n\nCarotid artery stenosis screening invivo choice is -\n\na) USG\nb) CT\nc) MRI\nd) Doppler"}], "sampled": ["a) USG"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:57.077764+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 285, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.238", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "d) Doppler", "picked": null, "sampled": "a) USG", "options": ["d) Doppler"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:57.077829+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 286, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.255", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Dental\n\nMaximum flow of Type1 inlay wax at 45degree\n\na) 2%\nb) 3%\nc) 10%\nd) 70%"}], "sampled": ["a) 2%"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:57.434154+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 287, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.255", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "d) 70%", "picked": null, "sampled": "a) 2%", "options": ["d) 70%"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:57.434196+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 288, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.106", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Anatomy\n\nStomach is derived from ?\n\na) Foregut\nb) Midgut\nc) Hindgut\nd) Allantois"}], "sampled": ["a) Foregut"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:57.493457+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 289, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.106", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) Foregut", "picked": "a) Foregut", "sampled": "a) Foregut", "options": ["a) Foregut"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:57.493586+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 290, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.222", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Social & Preventive Medicine\n\nYou are the medical officer in charge of the immunisation programme at a sub-centre and you are informed by the local ASHA worker that one of the children who was immunised has has been dizzy. On fuher investigation it was confirmed that the symptoms were due to anxiety of pain of the injection and not as a result of the vaccine. You would consider the incidence as:\n\na) Vaccine reaction\nb) Injection reaction\nc) Programme error\nd) Coincidental"}], "sampled": ["b) Injection reaction"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:58.033920+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 291, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.222", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "b) Injection reaction", "picked": "b) Injection reaction", "sampled": "b) Injection reaction", "options": ["b) Injection reaction"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:58.033981+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 292, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.41", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Anatomy\n\nAll of the following are features of Lymph node histology except\n\na) Subcapsular sinus present\nb) Both Efferent and Afferent are present\nc) Coex and Medulla are present\nd) Red pulp and White pulp are present"}], "sampled": ["d) Red pulp and White pulp are present"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:58.051482+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 293, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.41", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "d) Red pulp and White pulp are present", "picked": "d) Red pulp and White pulp are present", "sampled": "d) Red pulp and White pulp are present", "options": ["d) Red pulp and White pulp are present"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:58.051529+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 294, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.234", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Anaesthesia\n\nPost operative muscle ache is caused by\n\na) d-TC\nb) Suxamethonium\nc) Gallamine\nd) Pancuronium"}], "sampled": ["b) Suxamethonium"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:58.162201+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 295, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.234", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "b) Suxamethonium", "picked": "b) Suxamethonium", "sampled": "b) Suxamethonium", "options": ["b) Suxamethonium"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:58.162261+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 296, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.143", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Pathology\n\nEarliest lesion seen in atherosclerosis is:\n\na) Fatty streaks\nb) Intimal thickening\nc) Fibrinoid necrosis\nd) Plaque"}], "sampled": ["a) Fatty streaks"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:58.363647+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 297, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.143", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) Fatty streaks", "picked": "a) Fatty streaks", "sampled": "a) Fatty streaks", "options": ["a) Fatty streaks"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:58.363723+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 298, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.224", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Psychiatry\n\nPostponing paying attention of conscious impulse or conflict is a mature defence mechanism known as -\n\na) Sublimation\nb) Suppression\nc) Humor\nd) Anticipation"}], "sampled": ["b) Suppression"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:58.498393+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 299, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.224", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "b) Suppression", "picked": "b) Suppression", "sampled": "b) Suppression", "options": ["b) Suppression"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:58.498440+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 300, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.82", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Social & Preventive Medicine\n\nOne standard detion in normal standard curev includes value-\n\na) 50%\nb) 68%\nc) 95%\nd) 100%"}], "sampled": ["b) 68%"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:58.559571+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 301, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.82", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "b) 68%", "picked": "b) 68%", "sampled": "b) 68%", "options": ["b) 68%"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:58.559618+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 302, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.236", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Biochemistry\n\nInherited hyperammonemia is a result of deficiency of which enzyme of Krebs-Henseleit urea cycle?\n\na) Malate dehydrogenase\nb) Isocitrate dehydrogenase\nc) N-acetyl glutamate synthetase\nd) Succinate dehydrogenase"}], "sampled": ["c) N-acetyl glutamate synthetase"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:58.585816+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 303, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.236", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "c) N-acetyl glutamate synthetase", "picked": "c) N-acetyl glutamate synthetase", "sampled": "c) N-acetyl glutamate synthetase", "options": ["c) N-acetyl glutamate synthetase"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:58.585865+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 304, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.120", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Radiology\n\nA 50 year old female patient complains of difficulty in swallowing. Patient gives h/o multiple diagnostic CT-scans of the head and neck region. This patient may be predominantly susceptible to which of the following?\n\na) Medullary thyroid carcinoma\nb) Follicular thyroid carcinoma\nc) Anaplastic thyroid carcinoma\nd) Papillary thyroid carcinoma"}], "sampled": ["d) Papillary thyroid carcinoma"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:58.912863+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 305, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.89", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Microbiology\n\nTest for diagnosis of pyogenic meningitis is?\n\na) Widal\nb) CSF PCR\nc) CSF examination\nd) PET scan"}], "sampled": ["c) CSF examination"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:58.923418+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 306, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.120", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "d) Papillary thyroid carcinoma", "picked": "d) Papillary thyroid carcinoma", "sampled": "d) Papillary thyroid carcinoma", "options": ["d) Papillary thyroid carcinoma"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:58.923466+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 307, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.89", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "c) CSF examination", "picked": "c) CSF examination", "sampled": "c) CSF examination", "options": ["c) CSF examination"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:58.923535+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 308, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.7", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Surgery\n\nPer rectum examination is not a useful test for diagnosis of\n\na) Anal fissure\nb) Hemorrhoid\nc) Pilonidal sinus\nd) Rectal ulcer"}], "sampled": ["c) Pilonidal sinus"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:59.677875+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 309, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.7", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "c) Pilonidal sinus", "picked": "c) Pilonidal sinus", "sampled": "c) Pilonidal sinus", "options": ["c) Pilonidal sinus"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:06:59.677959+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 310, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.202", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: ENT\n\nTonsillar fossa is bounded anteriorly by\n\na) Pharyngobasilar fascia\nb) Palatopharyngeal fold\nc) Buccopharyngeal fascia\nd) Palatoglossal fold"}], "sampled": ["d) Palatoglossal fold"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:00.501958+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 311, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.202", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "d) Palatoglossal fold", "picked": "d) Palatoglossal fold", "sampled": "d) Palatoglossal fold", "options": ["d) Palatoglossal fold"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:00.502005+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 312, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.110", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Medicine\n\nWhich of the following is a poor prognostic factor for childhood ALL.\n\na) Total Leukocyte count 4000-100,000\nb) Age < 2 years\nc) Testicular involvement\nd) Blasts in peripheral smear"}], "sampled": ["c) Testicular involvement"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:00.527387+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 313, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.110", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "c) Testicular involvement", "picked": "c) Testicular involvement", "sampled": "c) Testicular involvement", "options": ["c) Testicular involvement"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:00.527424+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 314, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.182", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Surgery\n\nA young lady with symptoms of hypehyroidism with elevated T4 and TSH levels. On examination, patient was not experiencing Tachycardia or excessive sweating.Fuher examination reveals bitemporal hemianopia. Next step of management\n\na) Sta beta blockers immediately\nb) Conservative management sufficient\nc) Sta antithyroid drugs and wait for symptoms to resolve.\nd) Sta antithyroid drugs and do urgent MRI"}], "sampled": ["d) Sta antithyroid drugs and do urgent MRI"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:00.554951+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 315, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.182", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "d) Sta antithyroid drugs and do urgent MRI", "picked": "d) Sta antithyroid drugs and do urgent MRI", "sampled": "d) Sta antithyroid drugs and do urgent MRI", "options": ["d) Sta antithyroid drugs and do urgent MRI"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:00.554988+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 316, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.191", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Pharmacology\n\nThe drug used in petit mal seizures and has a narrow spectrum of antiepileptic activity is\n\na) Lamotrigine\nb) Ethosuximide\nc) Phenytoin\nd) Primidone"}], "sampled": ["b) Ethosuximide"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:00.637196+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 317, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.191", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "b) Ethosuximide", "picked": "b) Ethosuximide", "sampled": "b) Ethosuximide", "options": ["b) Ethosuximide"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:00.637246+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 318, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.187", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Microbiology\n\nIn pontaic fever, which antigen is seen in urine?\n\na) Lipopolysaccharide-1\nb) Lipopolysaccharide-2\nc) Lipopolysaccharide-4\nd) Lipopolysaccharide-6"}], "sampled": ["a) Lipopolysaccharide-1"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:00.662928+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 319, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.187", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) Lipopolysaccharide-1", "picked": "a) Lipopolysaccharide-1", "sampled": "a) Lipopolysaccharide-1", "options": ["a) Lipopolysaccharide-1"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:00.662988+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 320, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.218", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Medicine\n\nMycosis fungoides which is not true:\n\na) It is the most common form of cutaneous lymphoma.\nb) Pautriers microabscess.\nc) Indolent course and easily amenable to treatment.\nd) Erythroderma seen and spreads to peripheral."}], "sampled": ["c) Indolent course and easily amenable to treatment."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:01.071569+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 321, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.218", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "c) Indolent course and easily amenable to treatment.", "picked": "c) Indolent course and easily amenable to treatment.", "sampled": "c) Indolent course and easily amenable to treatment.", "options": ["c) Indolent course and easily amenable to treatment."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:01.071613+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 322, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.241", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Medicine\n\nFeatures of neurogenic shock are\n\na) ↑Peripheral resistance ↓ cardiac output\nb) ↑ Venous return ↑ cardiac output\nc) ↓Peripheral resistence↓cardiac output\nd) Venoconstriction ↓cardiac output"}], "sampled": ["c) ↓Peripheral resistence↓cardiac output"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:01.105545+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 323, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.241", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "c) ↓Peripheral resistence↓cardiac output", "picked": "c) ↓Peripheral resistence↓cardiac output", "sampled": "c) ↓Peripheral resistence↓cardiac output", "options": ["c) ↓Peripheral resistence↓cardiac output"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:01.105586+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 324, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.296", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Ophthalmology\n\nMost serious complication seen in other eye after traumatic injury to one eye: March 2005, September 2008\n\na) Subconjunctival hemorrhage\nb) Corneal edema\nc) Sympathetic ophthalmia\nd) Sudden loss of vision"}], "sampled": ["c) Sympathetic ophthalmia"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:01.400599+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 325, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.296", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "c) Sympathetic ophthalmia", "picked": "c) Sympathetic ophthalmia", "sampled": "c) Sympathetic ophthalmia", "options": ["c) Sympathetic ophthalmia"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:01.400646+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 326, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.242", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Forensic Medicine\n\nPalm of one hand is placed horizontally across the mouth and nostrils in\n\na) Manual strangulation\nb) Palmar strangulation\nc) Garrotting\nd) Mugging"}], "sampled": ["b) Palmar strangulation"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:01.830549+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 327, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.242", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "b) Palmar strangulation", "picked": "b) Palmar strangulation", "sampled": "b) Palmar strangulation", "options": ["b) Palmar strangulation"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:01.830587+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 328, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.235", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Surgery\n\nBlood stained sputum may be the only symptom in?\n\na) Bronchiectasis\nb) Carcinoma bronchus\nc) Adenoma bronchus\nd) Pulmonary T.B."}], "sampled": ["b) Carcinoma bronchus"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:02.062693+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 329, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.235", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "c) Adenoma bronchus", "picked": null, "sampled": "b) Carcinoma bronchus", "options": ["c) Adenoma bronchus"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:02.062737+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 330, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.176", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Surgery\n\nCarcinoma of the prostate arise from -\n\na) Central zone\nb) Peripheral zone\nc) Transitional zone\nd) Periurethral zone"}], "sampled": ["b) Peripheral zone"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:02.300167+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 331, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.176", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "b) Peripheral zone", "picked": "b) Peripheral zone", "sampled": "b) Peripheral zone", "options": ["b) Peripheral zone"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:02.300216+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 332, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.158", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Medicine\n\nWhich of the following is the most specific and sensitive screening test for renovascular hypeension?\n\na) HRCT\nb) CT Angiography\nc) Captopril enhanced radionucleotide scan\nd) Doppler ultrasound of renal aeries"}], "sampled": ["d) Doppler ultrasound of renal arteries"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:02.421181+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 333, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.158", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "b) CT Angiography", "picked": null, "sampled": "d) Doppler ultrasound of renal arteries", "options": ["b) CT Angiography"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:02.421219+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 334, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.27", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: ENT\n\nTreatment of choice in traumatic facial nerve injury is:\n\na) Facial sling\nb) Facial nerve repair\nc) Conservative management\nd) Systemic corticosteroids"}], "sampled": ["b) Facial nerve repair"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:02.473546+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 335, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.27", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "b) Facial nerve repair", "picked": "b) Facial nerve repair", "sampled": "b) Facial nerve repair", "options": ["b) Facial nerve repair"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:02.473608+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 336, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.16", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Anatomy\n\nHyper viscosity is seen in\n\na) Cryoglobulinemia\nb) Multiple myeloma\nc) MGUS\nd) Lymphoma"}], "sampled": ["b) Multiple myeloma"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:02.616497+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 337, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.16", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "a) Cryoglobulinemia", "picked": null, "sampled": "b) Multiple myeloma", "options": ["a) Cryoglobulinemia"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:02.616556+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 338, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.162", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Surgery\n\nAn athelete presented with red coloured urine after 2 days of history of severe exeion. The most probable cause is?\n\na) Hemoglobinuria\nb) Hemosiderinuria\nc) Hematuria\nd) Myoglobinuria"}], "sampled": ["d) Myoglobinuria"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:02.623054+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 339, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.162", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "d) Myoglobinuria", "picked": "d) Myoglobinuria", "sampled": "d) Myoglobinuria", "options": ["d) Myoglobinuria"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:02.623105+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 340, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.280", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Forensic Medicine\n\nFollowing poisoning retards putrefaction: NEET 13\n\na) Aluminium phosphide\nb) Lead\nc) Arsenic\nd) Copper"}], "sampled": ["c) Arsenic"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:02.755007+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 341, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.280", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "c) Arsenic", "picked": "c) Arsenic", "sampled": "c) Arsenic", "options": ["c) Arsenic"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:02.755053+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 342, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.237", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Forensic Medicine\n\nPunishment for infanticide comes under -\n\na) IPC102\nb) IPC324\nc) IPC302\nd) IPC300"}], "sampled": ["c) IPC302"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:02.808062+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 343, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.237", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "c) IPC302", "picked": "c) IPC302", "sampled": "c) IPC302", "options": ["c) IPC302"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:02.808133+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 344, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.285", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Anatomy\n\nLines of Blaschko&;s are along\n\na) Lymphatics\nb) Nervs\nc) Developmental\nd) Blood vessels"}], "sampled": ["c) Developmental"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:03.573397+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 345, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.285", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "c) Developmental", "picked": "c) Developmental", "sampled": "c) Developmental", "options": ["c) Developmental"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:03.573460+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 346, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.233", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Social & Preventive Medicine\n\nMost common widespread zoonotic disease in the world is -\n\na) Rabies\nb) Leptospirosis\nc) Brucella\nd) Anthrax"}], "sampled": ["b) Leptospirosis"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:04.028730+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 347, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.233", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "b) Leptospirosis", "picked": "b) Leptospirosis", "sampled": "b) Leptospirosis", "options": ["b) Leptospirosis"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:04.028791+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 348, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.248", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Medicine\n\nAll of the following are features of Devic's syndrome (neuromyelitis optica), except?\n\na) Separate attacks of acute optic neuritis and myelitis\nb) Optic neuritis is either unilateral or bilateral\nc) Brain MRI is typically normal\nd) It has a fulminant demyelinating process and progress to death in 1-2 year"}], "sampled": ["c) Brain MRI is typically normal"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:04.132196+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 349, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.248", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "d) It has a fulminant demyelinating process and progress to death in 1-2 year", "picked": null, "sampled": "c) Brain MRI is typically normal", "options": ["d) It has a fulminant demyelinating process and progress to death in 1-2 year"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:04.132233+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 350, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.49", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Social & Preventive Medicine\n\nMinimum level of iodine iodized salt reaching the consumer level according to iodine programme should be:-\n\na) 5 ppm\nb) 30 ppm\nc) 15 ppm\nd) 20 ppm"}], "sampled": ["b) 30 ppm"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:04.597477+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 351, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.49", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "c) 15 ppm", "picked": null, "sampled": "b) 30 ppm", "options": ["c) 15 ppm"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:04.597550+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 352, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.5", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Social & Preventive Medicine\n\nScrub typhus is transmitted by: September 2004\n\na) Louse\nb) Tick\nc) Mite\nd) Milk"}], "sampled": ["c) Mite"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:04.599258+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 353, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.5", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "c) Mite", "picked": "c) Mite", "sampled": "c) Mite", "options": ["c) Mite"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:04.599317+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 354, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.204", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Physiology\n\nShock causes:\n\na) Stagnant hypoxia\nb) Anemic hypoxia\nc) Hypoxic hypoxia\nd) Histotoxic hypoxia"}], "sampled": ["a) Stagnant hypoxia"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:04.602825+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 355, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.204", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) Stagnant hypoxia", "picked": "a) Stagnant hypoxia", "sampled": "a) Stagnant hypoxia", "options": ["a) Stagnant hypoxia"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:04.602890+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 356, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.118", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Radiology\n\nAdder Head\" appearance is found in:\n\na) X-ray\nb) USG\nc) IVP\nd) CT"}], "sampled": ["b) USG"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:05.033722+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 357, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.118", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "c) IVP", "picked": null, "sampled": "b) USG", "options": ["c) IVP"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:05.033770+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 358, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.249", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Dental\n\nWhich of the following is true about calcification of teeth?\n\na) Calcification of primary teeth is almost complete at time of birth\nb) Calcification of all primary teeth and few permanent teeth complete at birth\nc) Calcification of all permanent teeth complete at birt\nd) Calcification of primary teeth starts around birth"}], "sampled": ["b) Calcification of all primary teeth and few permanent teeth complete at birth"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:05.125420+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 359, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.249", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "a) Calcification of primary teeth is almost complete at time of birth", "picked": null, "sampled": "b) Calcification of all primary teeth and few permanent teeth complete at birth", "options": ["a) Calcification of primary teeth is almost complete at time of birth"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:05.125465+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 360, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.34", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Radiology\n\n25 year old patient Suspected to have a pneumoperitoneum. Patient is unable to stand. Best x-ray view is\n\na) Left lateral decubitus view\nb) Right lateral decubitus view\nc) Supine\nd) Prone"}], "sampled": ["a) Left lateral decubitus view"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:05.219837+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 361, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.34", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) Left lateral decubitus view", "picked": "a) Left lateral decubitus view", "sampled": "a) Left lateral decubitus view", "options": ["a) Left lateral decubitus view"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:05.219904+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 362, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.65", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Anatomy\n\nFalse about obstructive jaundice\n\na) Unconjugated bilirubin\nb) Pruritus\nc) Pale stools\nd) Icterus"}], "sampled": ["a) Unconjugated bilirubin"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:05.601258+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 363, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.65", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) Unconjugated bilirubin", "picked": "a) Unconjugated bilirubin", "sampled": "a) Unconjugated bilirubin", "options": ["a) Unconjugated bilirubin"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:05.601364+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 364, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.2", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Surgery\n\nAll of the following are surgical options for morbid obesity except -\n\na) Adjustable gastric banding\nb) Biliopancreatic diversion\nc) Duodenal Switch\nd) Roux en Y Duodenal By pass"}], "sampled": ["d) Roux en Y Duodenal By pass"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:06.106824+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 365, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.2", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "d) Roux en Y Duodenal By pass", "picked": "d) Roux en Y Duodenal By pass", "sampled": "d) Roux en Y Duodenal By pass", "options": ["d) Roux en Y Duodenal By pass"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:06.106873+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 366, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.45", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Physiology\n\nGlucose sympo occurs with:\n\na) Na+\nb) Ca++\nc) K+\nd) Cl-"}], "sampled": ["a) Na+"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:06.392413+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 367, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.45", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) Na+", "picked": "a) Na+", "sampled": "a) Na+", "options": ["a) Na+"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:06.392451+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 368, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.96", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Physiology\n\nWhich of the following hormonal activity is expected immediately prior to Ovulation?\n\na) LH surge\nb) FSH surge\nc) Progestrone surge\nd) Estrogen surge"}], "sampled": ["a) LH surge"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:06.645583+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 369, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.96", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) LH surge", "picked": "a) LH surge", "sampled": "a) LH surge", "options": ["a) LH surge"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:06.645664+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 370, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.113", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Gynaecology & Obstetrics\n\nSavita is 32 weeks pregnant presents in causality and diagnosed as a case of APH. Vitals are unstable with BP 80/60 which of the following is next step in M/n\n\na) Careful observation\nb) Blood transfusion\nc) Medical induction of labour\nd) Immediate cesarean section"}], "sampled": ["b) Blood transfusion"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:06.830072+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 371, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.113", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "b) Blood transfusion", "picked": "b) Blood transfusion", "sampled": "b) Blood transfusion", "options": ["b) Blood transfusion"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:06.830112+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 372, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.258", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Pathology\n\nFactor V Leiden is caused due to a mutation that results in a substitution at position 506 glutamine to which of the following:\n\na) Alanine\nb) Arginine\nc) Glycine\nd) Glutamine"}], "sampled": ["b) Arginine"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:06.853274+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 373, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.258", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "b) Arginine", "picked": "b) Arginine", "sampled": "b) Arginine", "options": ["b) Arginine"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:06.853333+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 374, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.139", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Pharmacology\n\nSchizophrenia is treated by\n\na) Anti depressants\nb) Anti psychotics\nc) Anti epileptics\nd) Mood stabilizers"}], "sampled": ["b) Anti psychotics"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:06.908873+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 375, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.139", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "b) Anti psychotics", "picked": "b) Anti psychotics", "sampled": "b) Anti psychotics", "options": ["b) Anti psychotics"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:06.908912+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 376, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.123", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Pediatrics\n\nAn ill 16 days old baby girl is brought to the emergency. On examination pallor and dyspnoea present with a respiratory rate of 85 per minute. Her HR is 200 bpm, hea sounds are distant and a gallop is heard. X-ray showed cardiomegaly. An echocardiogram shows dilated ventricles and dilation of the left atrium. An ECG shows ventricular depolarization complexes that have low voltage. Which of the following is the most likely diagnosis?\n\na) CHF\nb) Glycogen storage disease\nc) Pericarditis\nd) Aberrant left coronary aery arising from pulmonary aery"}], "sampled": ["a) CHF"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:06.994162+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 377, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.123", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) CHF", "picked": "a) CHF", "sampled": "a) CHF", "options": ["a) CHF"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:06.994221+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 378, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.59", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Microbiology\n\nWhich of the following is very difficult to induce antibody -\n\na) Polysaccharide\nb) Protein\nc) Antigen\nd) Effector"}], "sampled": ["a) Polysaccharide"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:07.566179+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 379, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.59", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) Polysaccharide", "picked": "a) Polysaccharide", "sampled": "a) Polysaccharide", "options": ["a) Polysaccharide"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:07.566226+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 380, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.184", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Ophthalmology\n\nA patient on amiodarone is diagnosed to have cornea verticillata. What should be management –\n\na) Stop the drug\nb) Penetrating keratoplasty\nc) Lamellar keratoplasty\nd) Observation"}], "sampled": ["d) Observation"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:07.606014+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 381, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.184", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "a) Stop the drug", "picked": null, "sampled": "d) Observation", "options": ["a) Stop the drug"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:07.606055+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 382, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.39", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Social & Preventive Medicine\n\nPearsonian measure of skewness -\n\na) Mode - Mean/ SD\nb) Mean - Mode/ SD\nc) SD/Mode - mean\nd) Mean - Mode/ SD"}], "sampled": ["b) Mean - Mode/ SD"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:07.860053+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 383, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.39", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "b) Mean - Mode/ SD", "picked": "b) Mean - Mode/ SD", "sampled": "b) Mean - Mode/ SD", "options": ["b) Mean - Mode/ SD"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:07.860093+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 384, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.11", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Medicine\n\nWhich of the following statements are True/False? 1. Hirsutism, which is defined as androgen-dependent excessive male pattern hair growth, affects approximately 25% of women. 2. Virilization refers to a condition in which androgen levels are sufficiently high to cause additional signs and symptoms. 3. Frequently, patients with growth hormone excess (i.e., acromegaly) present with hirsutism. 4. A simple and commonly used method to grade hair growth is the modified scale of Ferriman and Gallwey. 5. Scores above 8 suggest excess androgen-mediated hair growth.\n\na) 1, 2, 3 True & 4, 5 false\nb) 1, 3, 5 True & 2, 4 false\nc) 2, 4, 5 True & 1, 3 false\nd) 1, 2, 3, 4 True & 5 false"}], "sampled": ["c) 2, 4, 5 True & 1, 3 false"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:07.998514+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 385, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.11", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "c) 2, 4, 5 True & 1, 3 false", "picked": "c) 2, 4, 5 True & 1, 3 false", "sampled": "c) 2, 4, 5 True & 1, 3 false", "options": ["c) 2, 4, 5 True & 1, 3 false"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:07.998549+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 386, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.256", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Medicine\n\nPlatypnea is seen with?\n\na) Hepato-pulmonary syndrome\nb) Hepato-renal syndrome\nc) Renal aery stenosis\nd) Kyphoscoliosis"}], "sampled": ["a) Hepato-pulmonary syndrome"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:08.403335+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 387, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.256", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) Hepato-pulmonary syndrome", "picked": "a) Hepato-pulmonary syndrome", "sampled": "a) Hepato-pulmonary syndrome", "options": ["a) Hepato-pulmonary syndrome"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:08.403401+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 388, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.128", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Anatomy\n\nWhich of the following muscle acts as unlocker of knee?\n\na) Gracilis\nb) Popliteus\nc) Saorius\nd) Biceps femoris"}], "sampled": ["b) Popliteus"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:08.550325+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 389, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.128", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "b) Popliteus", "picked": "b) Popliteus", "sampled": "b) Popliteus", "options": ["b) Popliteus"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:08.550384+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 390, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.126", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Forensic Medicine\n\nWhere does the \"knot\" is put in the neck during judicial hanging?\n\na) The back of the neck\nb) Under angle of jaw\nc) Below the chin\nd) Choice of hangman"}], "sampled": ["b) Under angle of jaw"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:08.726201+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 391, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.126", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "b) Under angle of jaw", "picked": "b) Under angle of jaw", "sampled": "b) Under angle of jaw", "options": ["b) Under angle of jaw"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:08.726247+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 392, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.15", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Pharmacology\n\nWith which of the following receptors theophylline has an antagonistic interaction ?\n\na) Histamine receptors\nb) Bradykinin receptors\nc) Adenosine receptors\nd) Imidazoline receptors"}], "sampled": ["c) Adenosine receptors"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:08.790836+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 393, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.15", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "c) Adenosine receptors", "picked": "c) Adenosine receptors", "sampled": "c) Adenosine receptors", "options": ["c) Adenosine receptors"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:08.790895+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 394, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.246", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Pathology\n\nHereditary spherocytosis is characterized by: March 2004\n\na) Anemia\nb) Splenomegaly\nc) Jaundice\nd) All of the above"}], "sampled": ["d) All of the above"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:08.850442+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 395, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.246", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "d) All of the above", "picked": "d) All of the above", "sampled": "d) All of the above", "options": ["d) All of the above"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:08.850480+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 396, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.73", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Dental\n\nDetermination of Pulp vitality by pulse oximeter based on:\n\na) Beer's law.\nb) Pascal's law.\nc) Doppler law.\nd) Poisslues law."}], "sampled": ["a) Beer's law."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:08.933607+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 397, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.73", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) Beer's law.", "picked": "a) Beer's law.", "sampled": "a) Beer's law.", "options": ["a) Beer's law."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:08.933665+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 398, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.217", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Pharmacology\n\nWhich of the following drugs can be administered by subcutaneous route?\n\na) Albuterol\nb) Metaproterenol\nc) Terbutaline\nd) Pirbuterol"}], "sampled": ["c) Terbutaline"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:09.068274+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 399, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.217", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "c) Terbutaline", "picked": "c) Terbutaline", "sampled": "c) Terbutaline", "options": ["c) Terbutaline"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:09.068334+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 400, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.295", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Biochemistry\n\nAll will predispose to atherosclerosis, except\n\na) Homocystinemia\nb) Fibrinogen\nc) Calcium\nd) Lipoprotein A"}], "sampled": ["c) Calcium"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:09.440152+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 401, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.295", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "c) Calcium", "picked": "c) Calcium", "sampled": "c) Calcium", "options": ["c) Calcium"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:09.440201+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 402, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.103", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Orthopaedics\n\nIncrease in pauwel's angle indicate\n\na) Good prognosis\nb) Impaction\nc) More chances of displacement\nd) Trabecular alignment displacement"}], "sampled": ["c) More chances of displacement"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:09.685851+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 403, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.103", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "c) More chances of displacement", "picked": "c) More chances of displacement", "sampled": "c) More chances of displacement", "options": ["c) More chances of displacement"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:09.685899+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 404, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.58", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Forensic Medicine\n\nAccording to recent SC judgment, doctor can be charged for medical negligence under 304-A, only if: AIIMS 12\n\na) He is from corporate hospital\nb) Negligence is from inadveent error\nc) Simple negligence\nd) Gross negligence"}], "sampled": ["d) Gross negligence"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:10.262046+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 405, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.58", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "d) Gross negligence", "picked": "d) Gross negligence", "sampled": "d) Gross negligence", "options": ["d) Gross negligence"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:10.271995+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 406, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.93", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Microbiology\n\nA 12-year-old girl presents to the casualty with symptoms of fever, shoness of breath, and cough. A chest X-ray reveals complete consolidation of the lower lobe of the left lung. Cultures of the lower lobe of the left lung would most likely reveal which organism?\n\na) Streptococcus pneumoniae\nb) Staphylococcus aureus\nc) Klebsiella pneumoniae\nd) Pseudomonas aeruginosa"}], "sampled": ["a) Streptococcus pneumoniae"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:10.388294+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 407, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.93", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) Streptococcus pneumoniae", "picked": "a) Streptococcus pneumoniae", "sampled": "a) Streptococcus pneumoniae", "options": ["a) Streptococcus pneumoniae"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:10.388341+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 408, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.275", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Anatomy\n\nWhich of the following events is involved in cleavage of the zygote during week 1 of development?\n\na) A series of meiotic divisions forming blastomeres\nb) Production of highly differentiated blastomeres\nc) An increased cytoplasmic content of blastomeres\nd) A decrease in size of blastomeres"}], "sampled": ["a) A series of meiotic divisions forming blastomeres"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:10.649575+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 409, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.275", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "d) A decrease in size of blastomeres", "picked": null, "sampled": "a) A series of meiotic divisions forming blastomeres", "options": ["d) A decrease in size of blastomeres"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:10.649714+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 410, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.271", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Ophthalmology\n\nChild with mild squint. Intrauterine, bih history, developmental history till date all normal. Corneal reflex normal. All other eye parameters normal except exaggerated epicanthal fold. Diagnosis ?\n\na) Pseudostrabismus\nb) Accomodative squint\nc) Exophoria\nd) Esophoria"}], "sampled": ["a) Pseudostrabismus"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:10.671708+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 411, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.271", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) Pseudostrabismus", "picked": "a) Pseudostrabismus", "sampled": "a) Pseudostrabismus", "options": ["a) Pseudostrabismus"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:10.671759+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 412, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.48", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Biochemistry\n\nIn chronic alcoholism the rate limiting component for alcohol metabolism excluding enzymes is/are : (PGI Dec 2008)\n\na) NADP\nb) NAD+\nc) NADPH\nd) FADH"}], "sampled": ["b) NAD+"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:10.730485+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 413, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.48", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "b) NAD+", "picked": "b) NAD+", "sampled": "b) NAD+", "options": ["b) NAD+"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:10.730567+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 414, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.4", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Physiology\n\nGrowth hormone has its effect on growth through?\n\na) Directly\nb) IG1-1\nc) Thyroxine\nd) Intranuclear receptors"}], "sampled": ["b) IG1-1"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:10.748958+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 415, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.4", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "b) IG1-1", "picked": "b) IG1-1", "sampled": "b) IG1-1", "options": ["b) IG1-1"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:10.749003+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 416, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.150", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Social & Preventive Medicine\n\nTo feel comfoable and cool in a factory the conrrected effective temperature ( in degree Farenheit) should be -\n\na) Less tha 69\nb) Between 69 and 76\nc) Between 77 and 80\nd) Between 81 and 82"}], "sampled": ["b) Between 69 and 76"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:11.134961+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 417, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.150", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "b) Between 69 and 76", "picked": "b) Between 69 and 76", "sampled": "b) Between 69 and 76", "options": ["b) Between 69 and 76"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:11.135002+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 418, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.90", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Radiology\n\nCauses of thickened gallbladder wall on ultrasound examination are all except:\n\na) Postprandial state\nb) Cholecystitis\nc) Congestive cardiac failure\nd) Kawasaki disease"}], "sampled": ["a) Postprandial state"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:11.774226+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 419, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.90", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "d) Kawasaki disease", "picked": null, "sampled": "a) Postprandial state", "options": ["d) Kawasaki disease"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:11.774272+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 420, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.160", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Medicine\n\nA 63 year old man presents with a triad of angina, syncope and congestive hea failure. Which of the following valvular hea lesion can be suspected-\n\na) antral stenosis\nb) Tricuspid regurgitation\nc) Aoic stenosis\nd) Aoic regurgitation"}], "sampled": ["c) Aoic stenosis"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:11.791044+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 421, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.160", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "c) Aoic stenosis", "picked": "c) Aoic stenosis", "sampled": "c) Aoic stenosis", "options": ["c) Aoic stenosis"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:11.791083+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 422, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.146", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Anatomy\n\nBlood supply of stomach is/are:\n\na) Left gastric aery\nb) Sho gastric aery\nc) Lt gastroepiploic aery\nd) All"}], "sampled": ["d) All"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:11.855689+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 423, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.146", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "d) All", "picked": "d) All", "sampled": "d) All", "options": ["d) All"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:11.855736+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 424, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.221", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Pathology\n\nAutosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease features include:\n\na) Can be diagnosed intrauterine\nb) Proceeds to renal failure till children reaches school going age\nc) Can be palpated abdominally\nd) Hypertension doesn't develop until late stages of the disease"}], "sampled": ["a) Can be diagnosed intrauterine"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:11.980273+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 425, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.221", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) Can be diagnosed intrauterine", "picked": "a) Can be diagnosed intrauterine", "sampled": "a) Can be diagnosed intrauterine", "options": ["a) Can be diagnosed intrauterine"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:11.980313+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 426, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.273", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Forensic Medicine\n\nNot used for iron poison in: FMGE 09; NEET 13\n\na) Magnesium hydroxide\nb) Desferrioxamine\nc) Gastric lavage\nd) Penicillamine"}], "sampled": ["b) Desferrioxamine"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:12.610913+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 427, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.273", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "d) Penicillamine", "picked": null, "sampled": "b) Desferrioxamine", "options": ["d) Penicillamine"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:12.610970+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 428, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.99", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Radiology\n\nThe radiograph of a 32 year old patient is shown below. The patient is asymptomatic and the lesion revealed in the radiograph is an accidental finding. The most likely diagnosis is:\n\na) Stafne’s bone cavity\nb) Radicular Cyst\nc) Dentigerous cyst\nd) Lateral periodontal cyst"}], "sampled": ["a) Stafne’s bone cavity"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:13.433252+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 429, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.99", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) Stafne’s bone cavity", "picked": "a) Stafne’s bone cavity", "sampled": "a) Stafne’s bone cavity", "options": ["a) Stafne’s bone cavity"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:13.433293+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 430, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.261", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Microbiology\n\nFish tank granuloma is seen in -\n\na) Mfortuitum\nb) Mkansasi\nc) Mmarinum\nd) M leprosy"}], "sampled": ["c) Mmarinum"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:13.465350+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 431, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.261", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "c) Mmarinum", "picked": "c) Mmarinum", "sampled": "c) Mmarinum", "options": ["c) Mmarinum"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:13.465392+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 432, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.100", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Forensic Medicine\n\nMagistrate inquest not needed in: JIPMER 14\n\na) Homicide\nb) Exhumation\nc) Police custody death\nd) Dowry death"}], "sampled": ["b) Exhumation"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:13.471744+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 433, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.100", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "a) Homicide", "picked": null, "sampled": "b) Exhumation", "options": ["a) Homicide"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:13.471794+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 434, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.199", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Anatomy\n\nSupraventricular crest lies between-\n\na) Pulmonary orifice and atrioventricular orifice\nb) Atrioventricular orifice and fossa ovalis\nc) SVC and right atrium\nd) Right an dleft coronary artery"}], "sampled": ["a) Pulmonary orifice and atrioventricular orifice"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:14.003471+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 435, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.199", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) Pulmonary orifice and atrioventricular orifice", "picked": "a) Pulmonary orifice and atrioventricular orifice", "sampled": "a) Pulmonary orifice and atrioventricular orifice", "options": ["a) Pulmonary orifice and atrioventricular orifice"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:14.003520+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 436, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.116", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Pharmacology\n\nThe following drugs have significant drug interactions with digoxin except:\n\na) Cholestyramine\nb) Thiazide diuretics\nc) Quinidine\nd) Amlodipine"}], "sampled": ["d) Amlodipine"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:14.074475+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 437, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.116", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "d) Amlodipine", "picked": "d) Amlodipine", "sampled": "d) Amlodipine", "options": ["d) Amlodipine"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:14.074530+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 438, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.141", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Pathology\n\nA 45-year-old woman complains of severe headaches and difficulty in swallowing. Over the past 6 months, she has noticed small, red lesions around her mouth as well as thickening of her skin. The patient has \"stone facies\" on physical examination. Which of the following antigens is the most common and most specific target of autoantibody in patients with this disease?\n\na) C-ANCA (anti-proteinase-3)\nb) Double-stranded DNA\nc) P-ANCA (anti-myeloperoxidase)\nd) Scl-70 (anti-topoisomerase I)"}], "sampled": ["d) Scl-70 (anti-topoisomerase I)"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:14.271591+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 439, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.141", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "d) Scl-70 (anti-topoisomerase I)", "picked": "d) Scl-70 (anti-topoisomerase I)", "sampled": "d) Scl-70 (anti-topoisomerase I)", "options": ["d) Scl-70 (anti-topoisomerase I)"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:14.271639+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 440, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.67", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Gynaecology & Obstetrics\n\nWhich of the following is the best procedure done for intrapaum fetal monitoring:\n\na) Fetal echocardiography\nb) Fetal scalp pH\nc) Continuous electrical fetal hea monitoring\nd) Physical examination"}], "sampled": ["c) Continuous electrical fetal heart monitoring"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:14.734765+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 441, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.67", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "c) Continuous electrical fetal hea monitoring", "picked": null, "sampled": "c) Continuous electrical fetal heart monitoring", "options": ["c) Continuous electrical fetal hea monitoring"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:14.734823+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 442, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.262", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Microbiology\n\nTYNDALLISATION is a type of\n\na) intermittent sterilization\nb) pasteurisation\nc) boiling\nd) autoclaving"}], "sampled": ["a) intermittent sterilization"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:14.746076+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 443, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.262", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) intermittent sterilization", "picked": "a) intermittent sterilization", "sampled": "a) intermittent sterilization", "options": ["a) intermittent sterilization"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:14.746115+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 444, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.43", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Surgery\n\nWhich of the following bacterial meningitis is associated with sudural effusion?\n\na) H. influenza\nb) Neisseria meningitits\nc) Streptococcus pneumonia\nd) Enterococcus"}], "sampled": ["c) Streptococcus pneumonia"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:15.168794+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 445, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.43", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "a) H. influenza", "picked": null, "sampled": "c) Streptococcus pneumonia", "options": ["a) H. influenza"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:15.168853+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 446, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.85", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Medicine\n\nRescue P.C.I is done for which of the following?\n\na) Persistent chest pain with ST elevation > 60 min after thrombolysis\nb) Persistent chest pain with ST elevation > 30 min after thrombolysis\nc) Persistent Chest pain with ST elevation >90 min after thrombolysis\nd) Pain with ST elevation for >120minutes after thrombolysis"}], "sampled": ["b) Persistent chest pain with ST elevation > 30 min after thrombolysis"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:15.287145+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 447, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.85", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "c) Persistent Chest pain with ST elevation >90 min after thrombolysis", "picked": null, "sampled": "b) Persistent chest pain with ST elevation > 30 min after thrombolysis", "options": ["c) Persistent Chest pain with ST elevation >90 min after thrombolysis"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:15.287199+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 448, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.185", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Pathology\n\nMost aggressive lung CA:\n\na) Squamous cell CA\nb) Adenocarcinoma\nc) Small cell lung CA\nd) Large cell CA"}], "sampled": ["c) Small cell lung CA"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:15.610380+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 449, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.185", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "c) Small cell lung CA", "picked": "c) Small cell lung CA", "sampled": "c) Small cell lung CA", "options": ["c) Small cell lung CA"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:15.610428+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 450, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.168", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Gynaecology & Obstetrics\n\nWhich of these is the most impoant indication for Strassmans Metroplasty done for a bicornuate uterus?\n\na) Infeility\nb) Menorrhagia\nc) Repeated early pregnancy losses\nd) Associated vaginal atresia"}], "sampled": ["c) Repeated early pregnancy losses"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:15.696845+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 451, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.168", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "c) Repeated early pregnancy losses", "picked": "c) Repeated early pregnancy losses", "sampled": "c) Repeated early pregnancy losses", "options": ["c) Repeated early pregnancy losses"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:15.696929+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 452, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.21", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: ENT\n\nPosition of vocal cord in cadaver is:\n\na) Median\nb) Paramedian\nc) Intermediate\nd) Full Abduction"}], "sampled": ["b) Paramedian"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:15.883972+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 453, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.21", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "c) Intermediate", "picked": null, "sampled": "b) Paramedian", "options": ["c) Intermediate"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:15.884032+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 454, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.86", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Physiology\n\nFever associated with infection\n\na) Accelerates bacterial and viral replication\nb) Left shifts the oxygen dissociation curve\nc) Is due to interleukin-1 released from CD4 T-helper cells\nd) Increase oxygen release to tissue"}], "sampled": ["c) Is due to interleukin-1 released from CD4 T-helper cells"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:15.920366+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 455, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.86", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "d) Increase oxygen release to tissue", "picked": null, "sampled": "c) Is due to interleukin-1 released from CD4 T-helper cells", "options": ["d) Increase oxygen release to tissue"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:15.920417+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 456, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.251", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Radiology\n\nAll the following are seen in Hyperparathyroidism except\n\na) Subperiosteal erosion of bone\nb) Loss of lamina dura\nc) Calvarial thickening\nd) Pepper - pot skull"}], "sampled": ["c) Calvarial thickening"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:15.966168+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 457, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.251", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "c) Calvarial thickening", "picked": "c) Calvarial thickening", "sampled": "c) Calvarial thickening", "options": ["c) Calvarial thickening"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:15.966204+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 458, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.209", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Microbiology\n\nWhich of the following iodinated compound is present in a maximum concentration in the thyroid?\n\na) Monoiodotyrosine (MIT)\nb) Diiodotyrosine (DIT)\nc) T3\nd) Reverse T3"}], "sampled": ["b) Diiodotyrosine (DIT)"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:16.127648+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 459, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.209", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "b) Diiodotyrosine (DIT)", "picked": "b) Diiodotyrosine (DIT)", "sampled": "b) Diiodotyrosine (DIT)", "options": ["b) Diiodotyrosine (DIT)"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:16.127706+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 460, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.277", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Forensic Medicine\n\n'Patterned' abrasion is variety of:\n\na) Linear abrasion\nb) Pressure abrasion\nc) Sliding abrasion\nd) Superficial bruise"}], "sampled": ["b) Pressure abrasion"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:16.871681+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 461, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.277", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "b) Pressure abrasion", "picked": "b) Pressure abrasion", "sampled": "b) Pressure abrasion", "options": ["b) Pressure abrasion"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:16.871715+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 462, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.130", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Microbiology\n\nThe most sensitive method for detecting cervical Chlamydia trachomatis infection is:\n\na) Direct fluorescent antibody test\nb) Enzyme immunoassay\nc) Polymerase chain reaction\nd) Culture on irradiated McConkey cells"}], "sampled": ["c) Polymerase chain reaction"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:17.115637+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 463, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.130", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "c) Polymerase chain reaction", "picked": "c) Polymerase chain reaction", "sampled": "c) Polymerase chain reaction", "options": ["c) Polymerase chain reaction"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:17.115685+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 464, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.8", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Anaesthesia\n\nCharacteristics of Remifentanyl – a) Metabolised by plasma esteraseb) Short half lifec) More potent than Alfentanyld) Dose reduced in hepatic and renal diseasee) Duration of action more than Alfentanyl\n\na) ab\nb) bc\nc) abc\nd) bcd"}], "sampled": ["d) bcd"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:17.190369+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 465, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.8", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "c) abc", "picked": null, "sampled": "d) bcd", "options": ["c) abc"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:17.190413+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 466, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.171", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Social & Preventive Medicine\n\nBest disinfectant of cholera stool is-\n\na) Bleaching powder\nb) Cresol\nc) Phenol\nd) Lime"}], "sampled": ["a) Bleaching powder"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:17.939505+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 467, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.171", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "b) Cresol", "picked": null, "sampled": "a) Bleaching powder", "options": ["b) Cresol"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:17.939536+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 468, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.46", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Medicine\n\nAll are true about temporal arteritis except -\n\na) Can leads to sudden bilateral blindness\nb) More corrunon in females\nc) Worsen on exposure to heat\nd) Mostly affects elderly"}], "sampled": ["c) Worsen on exposure to heat"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:18.181772+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 469, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.46", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "c) Worsen on exposure to heat", "picked": "c) Worsen on exposure to heat", "sampled": "c) Worsen on exposure to heat", "options": ["c) Worsen on exposure to heat"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:18.181821+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 470, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.107", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Biochemistry\n\nWhich of the following is the main enzyme responsible for activation of xenobiotics?\n\na) Cytochrome P-450\nb) Glucuronyl transferase\nc) Glutathione S-transferase\nd) NADPH cytochrome P-450-reductase"}], "sampled": ["a) Cytochrome P-450"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:18.319347+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 471, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.107", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) Cytochrome P-450", "picked": "a) Cytochrome P-450", "sampled": "a) Cytochrome P-450", "options": ["a) Cytochrome P-450"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:18.319405+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 472, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.227", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Pharmacology\n\nWhich is an uricosuric drug-\n\na) Allopurinol\nb) Probenecid\nc) Indomethacin\nd) Aspirin"}], "sampled": ["b) Probenecid"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:18.474851+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 473, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.227", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "b) Probenecid", "picked": "b) Probenecid", "sampled": "b) Probenecid", "options": ["b) Probenecid"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:18.474899+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 474, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.124", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Radiology\n\nEgg shell calcification is seen in all except –\n\na) Sarcoidosis\nb) Silicosis\nc) Post irradiation lymphoma\nd) Bronchogenic CA"}], "sampled": ["c) Post irradiation lymphoma"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:18.800805+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 475, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.124", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "d) Bronchogenic CA", "picked": null, "sampled": "c) Post irradiation lymphoma", "options": ["d) Bronchogenic CA"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:18.800853+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 476, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.133", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Surgery\n\nCongenital hydrocele is best treated by\n\na) Eversion of sac\nb) Excision of sac\nc) Lord's procedure\nd) Herniotomy"}], "sampled": ["b) Excision of sac"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:18.922008+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 477, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.133", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "d) Herniotomy", "picked": null, "sampled": "b) Excision of sac", "options": ["d) Herniotomy"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:18.922050+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 478, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.216", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Dental\n\nThe retention of dowel in a pin retained crown is increased by\n\na) Increased length, smooth surface and increased taper.\nb) Increased length, serrated surface and increased taper.\nc) Increased length, smooth surface and parallel sides.\nd) Increased length, serrated surface and parallel sides."}], "sampled": ["d) Increased length, serrated surface and parallel sides."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:19.023380+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 479, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.216", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "d) Increased length, serrated surface and parallel sides.", "picked": "d) Increased length, serrated surface and parallel sides.", "sampled": "d) Increased length, serrated surface and parallel sides.", "options": ["d) Increased length, serrated surface and parallel sides."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:19.023469+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 480, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.283", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Dental\n\nThe main difference between dental stone and dental plaster is:\n\na) Chemical composition\nb) Self life\nc) Shape and size of particles\nd) Solubility in water"}], "sampled": ["c) Shape and size of particles"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:19.680667+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 481, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.283", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "c) Shape and size of particles", "picked": "c) Shape and size of particles", "sampled": "c) Shape and size of particles", "options": ["c) Shape and size of particles"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:19.680724+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 482, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.259", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Forensic Medicine\n\nKunkel's test is done to demonstrate presence of ................. in blood.\n\na) Lead\nb) CuSO4\nc) CO\nd) Dhatura"}], "sampled": ["c) CO"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:20.261500+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 483, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.259", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "c) CO", "picked": "c) CO", "sampled": "c) CO", "options": ["c) CO"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:20.261547+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 484, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.203", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Psychiatry\n\n\"Castration anxiety\" is seen in which phase of Sigmond Freud's psychosexual stages of development\n\na) Oral\nb) Anal\nc) Phallic\nd) Genital"}], "sampled": ["c) Phallic"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:20.267009+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 485, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.203", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "c) Phallic", "picked": "c) Phallic", "sampled": "c) Phallic", "options": ["c) Phallic"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:20.267054+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 486, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.152", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Surgery\n\nA 19 year old female presents with pain in the neck for 5 days. She is not able to wear tie for her job because of neck pain. H/O fatigue and lethargy for 10 days. She had flu like symptoms 20 days ago which resolved spontaneously. BP 110/80 mmHg, Pulse 48/min. Extremities are cold and dry. Neck is very tender. ECG normal. TSH is elevated. ESR 30 mm/hr. Next appropriate step\n\na) Atropine injection\nb) Levothyroxine administration\nc) Aspirin\nd) Increase iodine intake in food"}], "sampled": ["b) Levothyroxine administration"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:20.295568+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 487, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.152", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "c) Aspirin", "picked": null, "sampled": "b) Levothyroxine administration", "options": ["c) Aspirin"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:20.295605+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 488, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.95", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Dental\n\nA Dentin 'Primer'?\n\na) Etches the dentin\nb) It increases the surface energy & wets the dentin surface\nc) Removes the smear layer\nd) Conditions the dentin"}], "sampled": ["b) It increases the surface energy & wets the dentin surface"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:20.505354+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 489, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.95", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "b) It increases the surface energy & wets the dentin surface", "picked": "b) It increases the surface energy & wets the dentin surface", "sampled": "b) It increases the surface energy & wets the dentin surface", "options": ["b) It increases the surface energy & wets the dentin surface"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:20.505413+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 490, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.163", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Social & Preventive Medicine\n\nHigh false positive cases in a community signify that disease has -\n\na) High prevalence & Low incidence\nb) High incidence & Low prevalence\nc) Low prevalence & Low incidence\nd) High incidence & High prevalence"}], "sampled": ["c) Low prevalence & Low incidence"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:20.568761+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 491, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.163", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "b) High incidence & Low prevalence", "picked": null, "sampled": "c) Low prevalence & Low incidence", "options": ["b) High incidence & Low prevalence"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:20.568871+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 492, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.213", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Microbiology\n\nH. capsulatum, a dimorphic fungus, is found in soil heavily contaminated with bird droppings. Which of the following statements best describes the presence of the organism in tissue biopsies?\n\na) Yeasts with broad-based bud\nb) Single-cell yeasts with pseudohyphae\nc) Arthrospores\nd) Oval budding yeasts inside macrophages"}], "sampled": ["d) Oval budding yeasts inside macrophages"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:20.614427+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 493, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.213", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "d) Oval budding yeasts inside macrophages", "picked": "d) Oval budding yeasts inside macrophages", "sampled": "d) Oval budding yeasts inside macrophages", "options": ["d) Oval budding yeasts inside macrophages"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:20.614464+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 494, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.298", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Pharmacology\n\nWhich of the following aminoglycosides has the highest nephrotoxicity?\n\na) Paromomycin\nb) Streptomycin\nc) Amikacin\nd) Neomycin"}], "sampled": ["d) Neomycin"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:20.914242+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 495, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.298", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "d) Neomycin", "picked": "d) Neomycin", "sampled": "d) Neomycin", "options": ["d) Neomycin"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:20.914294+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 496, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.111", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Dental\n\nRelining of complete denture is not indicated when\n\na) Denture contains broken teeth\nb) There is excessive resorption of the ridge\nc) Vertical dimension is excessively reduced and has to be changed\nd) Centric relation does not coincide with centric occlusion"}], "sampled": ["c) Vertical dimension is excessively reduced and has to be changed"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:21.035106+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 497, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.111", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "c) Vertical dimension is excessively reduced and has to be changed", "picked": "c) Vertical dimension is excessively reduced and has to be changed", "sampled": "c) Vertical dimension is excessively reduced and has to be changed", "options": ["c) Vertical dimension is excessively reduced and has to be changed"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:21.035152+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 498, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.228", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Anatomy\n\nAfter an incised wound ,new collagen fibrils are seen along with a thick layer of growing epithelium.The approximate age of the wound is\n\na) 4-5days\nb) About 1week\nc) 12-24hrs\nd) 24-48 hrs"}], "sampled": ["b) About 1week"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:21.388347+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 499, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.228", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "a) 4-5days", "picked": null, "sampled": "b) About 1week", "options": ["a) 4-5days"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:21.388395+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 500, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.101", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Social & Preventive Medicine\n\nWhich of the following disease with bird, ahropod and human chain\n\na) Malaria\nb) Japanese encephalitis\nc) Paragonimus\nd) Plague"}], "sampled": ["b) Japanese encephalitis"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:21.938156+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 501, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.101", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "b) Japanese encephalitis", "picked": "b) Japanese encephalitis", "sampled": "b) Japanese encephalitis", "options": ["b) Japanese encephalitis"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:21.938186+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 502, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.247", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Anaesthesia\n\nKetamine can be given by all of following routes except-\n\na) IV\nb) IM\nc) SC\nd) Nasally"}], "sampled": ["c) SC"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:22.142156+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 503, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.247", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "c) SC", "picked": "c) SC", "sampled": "c) SC", "options": ["c) SC"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:22.142205+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 504, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.196", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Social & Preventive Medicine\n\nPrimary health care was proposed in 1978 at:\n\na) Alma ata\nb) New York\nc) Geneva\nd) Delhi"}], "sampled": ["a) Alma ata"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:22.350387+00:00"}
+{"final_report": {"accuracy": 0.7433333333333333}}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 505, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.196", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) Alma ata", "picked": "a) Alma ata", "sampled": "a) Alma ata", "options": ["a) Alma ata"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:22.357836+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 506, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.131", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Microbiology\n\nA labourer involved with repair-work of sewers was admitted with fever, jaundice and renal failure. The most appropriate test to diagnose the infection in this patient is -\n\na) Weil Felix test\nb) Paul Bunnell test\nc) Microscopic agglutination test\nd) Microimmunofluorescence test"}], "sampled": ["c) Microscopic agglutination test"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:22.375465+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 507, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.131", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "c) Microscopic agglutination test", "picked": "c) Microscopic agglutination test", "sampled": "c) Microscopic agglutination test", "options": ["c) Microscopic agglutination test"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:22.375522+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 508, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.105", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Social & Preventive Medicine\n\nIfa Panchayat is dissolved, elections are to be held within?\n\na) 1 month\nb) 3 months\nc) 6 months\nd) 1 year"}], "sampled": ["b) 3 months"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:22.392642+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 509, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.105", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "c) 6 months", "picked": null, "sampled": "b) 3 months", "options": ["c) 6 months"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:22.392683+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 510, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.6", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Gynaecology & Obstetrics\n\nAbnormal vascular patterns seen with colposcopy in case of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia  are all except\n\na) Punctation\nb) Mosaicism\nc) Satellite lesions\nd) Atypical vessels"}], "sampled": ["c) Satellite lesions"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:22.470965+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 511, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.6", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "c) Satellite lesions", "picked": "c) Satellite lesions", "sampled": "c) Satellite lesions", "options": ["c) Satellite lesions"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:22.471005+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 512, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.291", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: ENT\n\nAll are major symptoms of sinusitis except\n\na) Nasal blockage\nb) Facial congestion\nc) Nasal congestion\nd) Halitosis"}], "sampled": ["d) Halitosis"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:22.503829+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 513, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.291", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "d) Halitosis", "picked": "d) Halitosis", "sampled": "d) Halitosis", "options": ["d) Halitosis"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:22.503870+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 514, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.175", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Medicine\n\nUsually associated with parvovirus B19 infection in those with hereditary spherocytosis-\n\na) Mild to moderate splenomegaly\nb) Aplastic crisis\nc) Gallstones\nd) Hemolytic crisis"}], "sampled": ["b) Aplastic crisis"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:22.569008+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 515, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.175", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "b) Aplastic crisis", "picked": "b) Aplastic crisis", "sampled": "b) Aplastic crisis", "options": ["b) Aplastic crisis"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:22.569049+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 516, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.18", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Dental\n\nThe process of hardening a cement matrix through hydration with oral fluids  to achieve greater mechanical strength is known as:\n\na) Maturation\nb) Setting\nc) Hardening\nd) Mineralization"}], "sampled": ["b) Setting"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:23.297413+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 517, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.18", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "a) Maturation", "picked": null, "sampled": "b) Setting", "options": ["a) Maturation"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:23.297471+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 518, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.156", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Anatomy\n\nLigament teres is a remnant of ?\n\na) Ductus aeriosus\nb) Umbilical aery\nc) Umbilical vein\nd) Ductus venosus"}], "sampled": ["c) Umbilical vein"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:23.307307+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 519, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.156", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "c) Umbilical vein", "picked": "c) Umbilical vein", "sampled": "c) Umbilical vein", "options": ["c) Umbilical vein"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:23.307350+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 520, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.165", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Physiology\n\nVestibulo-Ocular Reflex Mediated by:\n\na) Flocculonodular Lobe\nb) Vermal portion of Spinocerebel 1 um\nc) Neocerebellum\nd) Paravermal region of Spinocerebellum"}], "sampled": ["d) Paravermal region of Spinocerebellum"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:23.805548+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 521, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.165", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "a) Flocculonodular Lobe", "picked": null, "sampled": "d) Paravermal region of Spinocerebellum", "options": ["a) Flocculonodular Lobe"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:23.805610+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 522, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.240", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Ophthalmology\n\nLens develops from?\n\na) Endoderm\nb) Mesoderm\nc) Surface ectoderm\nd) Neuroectoderm"}], "sampled": ["c) Surface ectoderm"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:23.931675+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 523, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.240", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "c) Surface ectoderm", "picked": "c) Surface ectoderm", "sampled": "c) Surface ectoderm", "options": ["c) Surface ectoderm"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:23.931734+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 524, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.135", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Social & Preventive Medicine\n\nVaccine administered by following route is\n\na) Typhoral live\nb) H1n1 killed\nc) H1n1 live\nd) Yellow fever live"}], "sampled": ["a) Typhoral live"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:24.714567+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 525, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.135", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "c) H1n1 live", "picked": null, "sampled": "a) Typhoral live", "options": ["c) H1n1 live"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:24.714628+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 526, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.220", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Gynaecology & Obstetrics\n\nPatient diagnosed as squamous cell intraepithelial lesion which of the following has the highest risk for progression to carcinoma;\n\na) Low grade squamous intraepithelial neoplasia\nb) High grade squamous intraepithelial neoplasia\nc) Squamous intraepithelial associated with HPV 16\nd) Squamous intraepithelial neoplasia associated with HIV"}], "sampled": ["b) High grade squamous intraepithelial neoplasia"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:24.727350+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 527, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.220", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "b) High grade squamous intraepithelial neoplasia", "picked": "b) High grade squamous intraepithelial neoplasia", "sampled": "b) High grade squamous intraepithelial neoplasia", "options": ["b) High grade squamous intraepithelial neoplasia"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:24.727397+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 528, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.10", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Microbiology\n\nNaglers reaction is shown by\n\na) Clostridium tetani\nb) Clostridium botulinum\nc) Clostridium perfringens\nd) Clostridium septicum"}], "sampled": ["c) Clostridium perfringens"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:25.108861+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 529, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.10", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "c) Clostridium perfringens", "picked": "c) Clostridium perfringens", "sampled": "c) Clostridium perfringens", "options": ["c) Clostridium perfringens"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:25.108942+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 530, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.244", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Social & Preventive Medicine\n\nNational program for prevention and control of Cancer, Diabetes, Cardiovascular disease and stroke (NPCDCS), true is -\n\na) Separate centre for stroke, DM, cancer\nb) Implementation in some 5 states over 10 districts\nc) District hospital has specialised facilities\nd) Subcentre has facility for diagnosis and treatment"}], "sampled": ["c) District hospital has specialised facilities"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:25.216100+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 531, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.244", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "c) District hospital has specialised facilities", "picked": "c) District hospital has specialised facilities", "sampled": "c) District hospital has specialised facilities", "options": ["c) District hospital has specialised facilities"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:25.216149+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 532, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.72", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Pharmacology\n\nMark the true statement regarding use of Lithium in maniac-depressive psychosis?\n\na) Monotherapy for acute episodes\nb) Monitoring of serum concentration is not useful for guiding dose adjustment\nc) Can result in leucocytosis\nd) Can result in hypehyroidism on long term use"}], "sampled": ["a) Monotherapy for acute episodes"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:25.410154+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 533, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.72", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "c) Can result in leucocytosis", "picked": null, "sampled": "a) Monotherapy for acute episodes", "options": ["c) Can result in leucocytosis"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:25.410194+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 534, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.47", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Medicine\n\nOf the various modalities used in the treatment of re-threatening effects of hyperkalemia which one of the following as the most rapid onset of action ?\n\na) Hemodialysis\nb) Sodium bicarbonate infusion\nc) Insulin and glucose infusion\nd) Intravenous calcium gluconate"}], "sampled": ["c) Insulin and glucose infusion"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:25.422474+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 535, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.47", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "a) Hemodialysis", "picked": null, "sampled": "c) Insulin and glucose infusion", "options": ["a) Hemodialysis"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:25.422514+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 536, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.149", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Unknown\n\nBurst supression pattern on EEG is typically seen in:\n\na) Anoxic encephalopathy\nb) Absence seizures\nc) SSPE\nd) Herpes simplex encephalitis"}], "sampled": ["a) Anoxic encephalopathy"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:25.788887+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 537, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.149", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) Anoxic encephalopathy", "picked": "a) Anoxic encephalopathy", "sampled": "a) Anoxic encephalopathy", "options": ["a) Anoxic encephalopathy"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:25.788934+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 538, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.22", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Microbiology\n\nOrganisms that has not been cultured successfully so far is-\n\na) Leptospira\nb) Treponema pallidum\nc) Bordetella\nd) Staphylococcus"}], "sampled": ["b) Treponema pallidum"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:25.832927+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 539, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.22", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "b) Treponema pallidum", "picked": "b) Treponema pallidum", "sampled": "b) Treponema pallidum", "options": ["b) Treponema pallidum"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:25.832964+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 540, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.64", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Social & Preventive Medicine\n\nHousehold insectiside used for malaria-\n\na) Malathion\nb) Pyrethrum\nc) Paris green\nd) Permethrin"}], "sampled": ["d) Permethrin"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:25.851304+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 541, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.64", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "a) Malathion", "picked": null, "sampled": "d) Permethrin", "options": ["a) Malathion"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:25.851344+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 542, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.52", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Ophthalmology\n\nRegarding Sjogren's syndrome, all are true except: September 2010\n\na) Keratoconjuctivitis sicca\nb) Rheumatoid ahritis\nc) Epiphora\nd) Autoimmune in nature"}], "sampled": ["c) Epiphora"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:26.174299+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 543, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.52", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "c) Epiphora", "picked": "c) Epiphora", "sampled": "c) Epiphora", "options": ["c) Epiphora"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:26.174344+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 544, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.35", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Microbiology\n\nWhat is the most probable poal of entry of Aspergillus?\n\na) Puncture wound\nb) Blood\nc) Lungs\nd) Gastrointestinal tract"}], "sampled": ["c) Lungs"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:26.820296+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 545, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.35", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "c) Lungs", "picked": "c) Lungs", "sampled": "c) Lungs", "options": ["c) Lungs"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:26.820359+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 546, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.0", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Anatomy\n\nChronic urethral obstruction due to benign prismatic hyperplasia can lead to the following change in kidney parenchyma\n\na) Hyperplasia\nb) Hyperophy\nc) Atrophy\nd) Dyplasia"}], "sampled": ["c) Atrophy"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:27.001426+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 547, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.0", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "c) Atrophy", "picked": "c) Atrophy", "sampled": "c) Atrophy", "options": ["c) Atrophy"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:27.001474+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 548, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.161", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Pathology\n\nGeneralised thickening of cortical and cancellous bones is seen in\n\na) Osteopetrosis\nb) Pagets disease\nc) Osteogenesis imperfecta\nd) Infantile hyperostosis"}], "sampled": ["a) Osteopetrosis"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:27.112726+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 549, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.161", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "d) Infantile hyperostosis", "picked": null, "sampled": "a) Osteopetrosis", "options": ["d) Infantile hyperostosis"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:27.112785+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 550, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.193", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Pathology\n\nMagic syndrome is seen in:\n\na) Behcet disease\nb) Aphthous major\nc) Herpetiform\nd) Bloom syndrome"}], "sampled": ["a) Behcet disease"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:27.930623+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 551, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.193", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) Behcet disease", "picked": "a) Behcet disease", "sampled": "a) Behcet disease", "options": ["a) Behcet disease"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:27.930654+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 552, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.223", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Anatomy\n\nBicipital aponeurosis lies over which structure in cubital fossa:-\n\na) Median cubital vein\nb) Radial nerve\nc) Brachial aery\nd) Anterior interosseous aery"}], "sampled": ["a) Median cubital vein"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:27.932774+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 553, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.223", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "c) Brachial aery", "picked": null, "sampled": "a) Median cubital vein", "options": ["c) Brachial aery"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:27.932803+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 554, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.289", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Microbiology\n\n\"Acute Meningoencephalitis\" is caused by:\n\na) E. histolytica\nb) Nageleria\nc) Giardia\nd) E.coli"}], "sampled": ["b) Nageleria"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:28.474461+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 555, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.289", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "b) Nageleria", "picked": "b) Nageleria", "sampled": "b) Nageleria", "options": ["b) Nageleria"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:28.474510+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 556, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.172", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Forensic Medicine\n\nBlack eye is a type of -\n\na) Patterend abrasion\nb) Ectopic abrasion\nc) Ectopic bruise\nd) Friction abrasion"}], "sampled": ["c) Ectopic bruise"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:28.474987+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 557, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.172", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "c) Ectopic bruise", "picked": "c) Ectopic bruise", "sampled": "c) Ectopic bruise", "options": ["c) Ectopic bruise"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:28.475024+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 558, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.229", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Gynaecology & Obstetrics\n\nAfter delivery, a 28 year old pre ecclamptic primigra has a soft uterus with moderate-to-heavy bleeding. There is no laceration and there is PPH diagnosed due to uterine atony. Which of the following is the best management option?\n\na) 0.2-mg intramuscular (IM) ergonovine (Methergine)\nb) 20 units of IV oxytocin\nc) 10 units of oral oxytocin\nd) 250 mg prostaglandin F2-alpha orally"}], "sampled": ["b) 20 units of IV oxytocin"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:28.533571+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 559, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.229", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "b) 20 units of IV oxytocin", "picked": "b) 20 units of IV oxytocin", "sampled": "b) 20 units of IV oxytocin", "options": ["b) 20 units of IV oxytocin"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:28.533607+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 560, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.125", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Anatomy\n\nIn inversion of the foot, the sole will face:\n\na) Upwards\nb) Downwards\nc) Laterally\nd) Medially"}], "sampled": ["d) Medially"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:28.827957+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 561, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.125", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "d) Medially", "picked": "d) Medially", "sampled": "d) Medially", "options": ["d) Medially"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:28.828041+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 562, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.297", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Psychiatry\n\nLeast commonly seen in conduct disorder seen in girls:-\n\na) Run away from home\nb) High risk sexual behavior\nc) Physical aggression\nd) Emotional bullying"}], "sampled": ["c) Physical aggression"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:29.142686+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 563, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.297", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "c) Physical aggression", "picked": "c) Physical aggression", "sampled": "c) Physical aggression", "options": ["c) Physical aggression"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:29.142734+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 564, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.83", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Microbiology\n\nFoam cells are seen in infection with which virus ?\n\na) Measles\nb) EBV\nc) Molluscum contagiosum\nd) RSV"}], "sampled": ["c) Molluscum contagiosum"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:29.279262+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 565, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.83", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "b) EBV", "picked": null, "sampled": "c) Molluscum contagiosum", "options": ["b) EBV"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:29.279423+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 566, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.69", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Microbiology\n\nWhich of the following is a newly emerging food poisoning organism\n\na) Salmonella typhimurium\nb) Enterococcus\nc) Diphtheria\nd) Pseudomonas"}], "sampled": ["b) Enterococcus"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:29.323405+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 567, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.69", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "a) Salmonella typhimurium", "picked": null, "sampled": "b) Enterococcus", "options": ["a) Salmonella typhimurium"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:29.323443+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 568, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.3", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Ophthalmology\n\nFollowing endaerectomy on the right common carotid, a patient is found to be blind in the right eye. It is appears that a small thrombus embolized during surgery and lodged in the aery supplying the optic nerve. Which aery would be blocked?\n\na) Central aery of the retina\nb) Infraorbital aery\nc) Lacrimal aery\nd) Nasociliary aretry"}], "sampled": ["a) Central aery of the retina"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:29.334656+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 569, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.3", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) Central aery of the retina", "picked": "a) Central aery of the retina", "sampled": "a) Central aery of the retina", "options": ["a) Central aery of the retina"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:29.334692+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 570, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.81", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Physiology\n\nWhat is the pressure of inspiration?\n\na) Intrapleuarl\nb) Transpulmonary\nc) Trans chest wall\nd) Alveolar pressure"}], "sampled": ["b) Transpulmonary"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:29.644657+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 571, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.81", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "a) Intrapleuarl", "picked": null, "sampled": "b) Transpulmonary", "options": ["a) Intrapleuarl"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:29.644703+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 572, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.299", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Physiology\n\nLeast conduction velocity is seen in:\n\na) AV node\nb) Purkinje fibers\nc) Bundle of His\nd) Ventricular myocardial fibres"}], "sampled": ["a) AV node"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:29.765222+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 573, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.299", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) AV node", "picked": "a) AV node", "sampled": "a) AV node", "options": ["a) AV node"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:29.765282+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 574, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.174", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Anatomy\n\nEndolymphatic duct drains into :\n\na) Subdural space\nb) External space\nc) Subarachnoid space\nd) Succulus"}], "sampled": ["d) Succulus"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:30.402002+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 575, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.174", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "a) Subdural space", "picked": null, "sampled": "d) Succulus", "options": ["a) Subdural space"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:30.402081+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 576, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.136", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Medicine\n\nA 40-year old diabetic patient presents with proptosis of one eye and black eschar over palate. The likely organism is :\n\na) Pseudomonas\nb) Candida\nc) E. coli\nd) Mucor"}], "sampled": ["d) Mucor"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:30.904259+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 577, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.136", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "d) Mucor", "picked": "d) Mucor", "sampled": "d) Mucor", "options": ["d) Mucor"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:30.904318+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 578, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.19", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Anatomy\n\nSuperior vena cava is derived from:\n\na) Aortic arch\nb) Pharyngeal arch\nc) Cardinal vein\nd) Vitelline vein"}], "sampled": ["c) Cardinal vein"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:30.908599+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 579, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.19", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "c) Cardinal vein", "picked": "c) Cardinal vein", "sampled": "c) Cardinal vein", "options": ["c) Cardinal vein"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:30.908644+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 580, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.274", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Anatomy\n\nPosterior relations of the head of the pancreas include all of the following, except:\n\na) First pa of the duodenum\nb) Common bile duct\nc) Inferior vena cava\nd) Aoa"}], "sampled": ["c) Inferior vena cava"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:30.909104+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 581, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.274", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "a) First pa of the duodenum", "picked": null, "sampled": "c) Inferior vena cava", "options": ["a) First pa of the duodenum"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:30.909138+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 582, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.55", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Pharmacology\n\nGp2b3A inhibitors are all except -\n\na) Abciximab\nb) Eptifibatide\nc) Tirofiban\nd) Prasugrel"}], "sampled": ["d) Prasugrel"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:30.927315+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 583, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.55", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "d) Prasugrel", "picked": "d) Prasugrel", "sampled": "d) Prasugrel", "options": ["d) Prasugrel"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:30.927353+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 584, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.170", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Ophthalmology\n\nWhich test helps to differentiate between concomitant squint and paralytic squint\n\na) Cover - uncover test\nb) Alternate covertest\nc) Direct cover test\nd) None of the above"}], "sampled": ["a) Cover - uncover test"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:30.941759+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 585, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.170", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "b) Alternate covertest", "picked": null, "sampled": "a) Cover - uncover test", "options": ["b) Alternate covertest"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:30.941795+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 586, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.194", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Microbiology\n\nAcute hemorrhagic conjunctivitis is caused by ?\n\na) Enterovirus 70\nb) Adenovirus\nc) Poliovirus\nd) Hepadnavirus"}], "sampled": ["a) Enterovirus 70"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:31.826583+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 587, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.194", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) Enterovirus 70", "picked": "a) Enterovirus 70", "sampled": "a) Enterovirus 70", "options": ["a) Enterovirus 70"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:31.826631+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 588, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.208", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Psychiatry\n\nIn Profound MR, IQ is\n\na) 50-69\nb) 35-49\nc) 20-34\nd) < 20"}], "sampled": ["d) < 20"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:31.967566+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 589, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.208", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "d) < 20", "picked": "d) < 20", "sampled": "d) < 20", "options": ["d) < 20"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:31.967607+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 590, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.287", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Medicine\n\nMiddle aged female with mass in sella turcica hormone increased is -\n\na) Prolactin\nb) Thyroxine\nc) Extrogen\nd) ADH"}], "sampled": ["a) Prolactin"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:31.982073+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 591, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.287", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) Prolactin", "picked": "a) Prolactin", "sampled": "a) Prolactin", "options": ["a) Prolactin"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:31.982123+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 592, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.137", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Medicine\n\nColoured urine is not seen in :\n\na) Quinine\nb) Rifampcin\nc) Nitrofurantoin\nd) Pyridium"}], "sampled": ["a) Quinine"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:32.418202+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 593, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.137", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "a) Quinine", "picked": "a) Quinine", "sampled": "a) Quinine", "options": ["a) Quinine"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:32.418250+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 594, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.26", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Pediatrics\n\nWhich of the following agents is most commonly associated with recurrent meningitis due to CSF leaks?\n\na) Meningococci\nb) Pneumococci\nc) Hemophilus Influenza\nd) E. Coli"}], "sampled": ["b) Pneumococci"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:32.423281+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 595, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.26", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "b) Pneumococci", "picked": "b) Pneumococci", "sampled": "b) Pneumococci", "options": ["b) Pneumococci"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:32.423353+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 596, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.44", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Pathology\n\nAll of the following statements are true regarding hyperophy, except:\n\na) Occurs due to synthesis and assembly of additional intracellular components.\nb) There is an increase in the size of the cells.\nc) Cells capable of division respond to stress by hyperophy and hyperplasia.\nd) There is an increase in the number of cells."}], "sampled": ["d) There is an increase in the number of cells."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:33.688252+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 597, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.44", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "d) There is an increase in the number of cells.", "picked": "d) There is an increase in the number of cells.", "sampled": "d) There is an increase in the number of cells.", "options": ["d) There is an increase in the number of cells."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:33.688313+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 598, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.215", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a highly intelligent doctor who answers the following multiple choice question correctly.\nOnly write the answer down."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Subject: Pediatrics\n\nTrue about polio:\n\na) Paralytic polio is most common\nb) Spastic paralysis seen\nc) IM injections and increased muscular activity lead to increased paralysis\nd) Polio drops in pulse polio immunisation given only in <3 years old children"}], "sampled": ["c) IM injections and increased muscular activity lead to increased paralysis"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:36.491840+00:00"}
+{"run_id": "230502230626UEYRABXR", "event_id": 599, "sample_id": "medmcqa.dev.215", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "c) IM injections and increased muscular activity lead to increased paralysis", "picked": "c) IM injections and increased muscular activity lead to increased paralysis", "sampled": "c) IM injections and increased muscular activity lead to increased paralysis", "options": ["c) IM injections and increased muscular activity lead to increased paralysis"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-05-02 23:07:36.491878+00:00"}
diff --git a/evals/us-tort-law/us-tort-law-turbo.jsonl b/evals/us-tort-law/us-tort-law-turbo.jsonl
deleted file mode 100644
index 0814f177ed55aa79c246b5806831313213d2c164..0000000000000000000000000000000000000000
--- a/evals/us-tort-law/us-tort-law-turbo.jsonl
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,682 +0,0 @@
-{"spec": {"completion_fns": ["gpt-3.5-turbo"], "eval_name": "us-tort-law.dev.v0", "base_eval": "us-tort-law", "split": "dev", "run_config": {"completion_fns": ["gpt-3.5-turbo"], "eval_spec": {"cls": "evals.elsuite.basic.match:Match", "args": {"few_shot_jsonl": "us_tort_law/few_shot.jsonl", "num_few_shot": 4, "samples_jsonl": "us_tort_law/samples.jsonl"}, "key": "us-tort-law.dev.v0", "group": "us-tort-law"}, "seed": 20220722, "max_samples": null, "command": "/Users/acabrera/dev-research/22-zeno/openai-eval/evals/evals/cli/oaieval.py gpt-3.5-turbo us-tort-law", "initial_settings": {"visible": true}}, "created_by": "", "run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:56:56.543978"}}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 0, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.281", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A private duty nurse on occasion worked in a hospital. The hospital called a private duty referral agency through which the nurse usually obtained employment and asked that in the future she not be assigned to patients in the hospital. The referral agency asked the hospital why it had made the request. The hospital sent a letter to the agency giving as the reason for its request that significant amounts of narcotics had disappeared during the nurse's shift from the nursing stations at which she had worked. Assume that although the narcotics disappeared during the nurse's shifts and the hospital reasonably believed that the nurse took the narcotics, the nurse did not actually take the narcotics. If the nurse asserts a claim based on defamation against the hospital, the nurse will\nA. recover, because the hospital accused the nurse of improper professional conduct.\nB. recover, because the nurse did not take the narcotics.\nC. not recover, because narcotics disappeared during the nurse's shifts.\nD. not recover, because the hospital reasonably believed that the nurse took the narcotics.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:56:57.641944+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 1, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.281", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "D", "picked": "D", "sampled": "D", "options": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:56:57.642096+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 2, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.12", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "An employer retained a doctor to evaluate medical records of prospective employees. The doctor informed the employer that an applicant, a prospective employee, suffered from AIDS. The employer informed the applicant of this and declined to hire her. The applicant was shocked by this news and suffered a heart attack as a result. Subsequent tests revealed that the applicant in fact did not have AIDS. The doctor had negligently confused the applicant's file with that of another prospective employee. If the applicant sued the doctor for damages, on which of the following causes of action would the applicant recover?\nA. Negligent infliction of emotional distress.\nB. Invasion of privacy.\nC. Negligent misrepresentation.\nD. Both invasion of privacy and negligent misrepresentation.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:56:57.689587+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 3, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.12", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "A", "picked": null, "sampled": "D", "options": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:56:57.689636+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 4, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.304", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A driver negligently ran into a pedestrian who was walking along a road. The pedestrian sustained an injury to his knee, causing it to buckle from time to time. Several months later, the pedestrian sustained an injury to his shoulder when his knee buckled, causing him to fall down a flight of stairs. The pedestrian then brought an action against the driver for the injuries to his knee and shoulder. In his action against the driver, for which of his injuries may the pedestrian recover damages?\nA. For the injuries to his knee and shoulder, because the driver takes the victim as he finds him.\nB. For the injuries to his knee and shoulder, if the jury finds that the pedestrian's fall down a flight of stairs was a normal consequence of his original injury.\nC. For the injury to his knee only, because the injury to the pedestrian's shoulder is separable.\nD. For the injury to his knee only, if the jury finds that the driver could not have foreseen that his negligent driving would cause the pedestrian to fall down a flight of stairs.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:56:57.708176+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 5, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.304", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "B", "picked": "B", "sampled": "B", "options": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:56:57.708223+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 6, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.84", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A 16-year old boy purchased an educational chemistry set manufactured by Chemco. The teenager invited his friend and classmate, the plaintiff, to assist him in a chemistry project. Referring to a library chemistry book on explosives and finding the chemistry set contained all of the necessary chemicals, the teenager and the plaintiff agreed to make a bomb. During the course of the project, the teenager carelessly knocked a lighted Bunsen burner into a bowl of chemicals from the chemistry set. The chemicals burst into flames, injuring the plaintiff. Although the chemistry set was as safe as possible, and its educational benefits exceeded its risks, the set did not contain a warning that it could be used to make dangerous explosives. In a suit by the plaintiff against Chemco, based on strict liability, the plaintiff will\nA. prevail, because the chemistry set did not contain a warning that its contents could be combined to form dangerous explosives.\nB. prevail, because manufacturers of chemistry sets are engaged in an abnormally dangerous activity.\nC. not prevail, because the teenager's negligence was the cause in fact of the plaintiff's injury.\nD. not prevail, because the chemistry set was as safe as possible, consistent with its educational purposes, and its benefits exceeded its risks.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:56:57.713749+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 7, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.84", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "D", "picked": "D", "sampled": "D", "options": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:56:57.713790+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 8, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.79", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A farmer owns a small farm with several head of cattle which are kept in a fenced grazing area. One day the cattle were frightened by a thunderstorm, an occasional occurrence in the area. The cattle broke through the fence, entered onto the neighbor's property, and severely damaged the neighbor's crops. Because the farmer's cattle had panicked during past thunderstorms, the farmer had been diligent in maintaining the fence. Under the law of the state, landowners are not required to erect fences to prevent the intrusion of livestock. If the neighbor sues the farmer to recover for the damage done to his crops, will the neighbor prevail?\nA. Yes, because the farmer's cattle caused the damage to the neighbor's crops.\nB. Yes, because the farmer's cattle had panicked during previous thunderstorms.\nC. No, because the fence was not negligently maintained by the farmer.\nD. No, because the thunderstorm was a force of nature.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:56:57.720123+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 9, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.79", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "A", "picked": "A", "sampled": "A", "options": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:56:57.720159+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 10, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.250", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A plaintiff sustained personal injuries in a three-car collision caused by the concurrent negligence of a trucker and a bus driver. In the plaintiff's action for damages against the other two drivers, the jury apportioned the negligence 30% to the plaintiff, 30% to the trucker, and 40% to the bus driver. The plaintiff's total damages were $100,000. A state statute provides for a system of pure comparative negligence, joint and several liability of concurrent tortfeasors, and contribution based upon proportionate fault. If the plaintiff chooses to pursue the claim against the trucker alone, she will be entitled to collect at most\nA. $70,000 from the trucker, and then the trucker will be entitled to collect $40,000 from the bus driver.\nB. $30,000 from the trucker, and then the trucker will be entitled to collect $10,000 from the bus driver.\nC. $30,000 from the trucker, and then the trucker will be entitled to collect nothing from the bus driver.\nD. nothing from the trucker, because the percentage of fault for the trucker is not greater than that of the plaintiff.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:56:57.725576+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 11, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.250", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "A", "picked": null, "sampled": "B", "options": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:56:57.725620+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 12, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.308", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A newspaper, printed an article that stated:\"Kitchen, the popular restaurant on the town square, has closed its doors. Kitchen employees have told [the newspaper] that the closing resulted from the owner's belief that Kitchen's general manager has embezzled thousands of dollars from the restaurant over the last several years. A decision on reopening the restaurant will be made after the completion of an audit of Kitchen's books. \"The plaintiff, who is Kitchen's general manager, brought a libel action against the newspaper based on the publication of this article. The parties stipulated that the plaintiff never embezzled any funds from Kitchen. They also stipulated that the plaintiff is well known among many people in the community because of his job with Kitchen. The case went to trial before a jury. The defendant's motion for a directed verdict in its favor, made at the close of the evidence, should be granted if the\nA. record contains no evidence that the plaintiff suffered special harm as a result of the publication.\nB. record contains no evidence that the defendant was negligent as to the truth or falsity of the charge of embezzlement.\nC. evidence is not clear and convincing that the defendant published the article with \"actual malice. \"\nD. record contains uncontradicted evidence that the article accurately reported what the employees told the newspaper.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:56:57.743208+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 13, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.308", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "B", "picked": null, "sampled": "C", "options": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:56:57.743247+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 14, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.284", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A homeowner hired a building contractor to rebuild her front porch. The contractor told her that he planned to first rip out the old floorboards and pile them in the front yard. Because she thought that would look unsightly, the homeowner insisted that the contractor loosen each board individually and leave them all in place until he was ready to start replacing them with new boards. The contractor loosened the boards and left them in place while he went out for lunch. While the contractor was away, a friend of the homeowner's stepped onto the porch to return a borrowed rake. As the friend crossed the porch, the loosened boards shifted and the friend fell, breaking her leg. If the friend sues to recover for her injury, who is likely to be found liable to her?\nA. Both the contractor and the homeowner, because neither posted a warning that the porch boards had been loosened.\nB. Neither the homeowner nor the contractor, because the friend was a licensee.\nC. The contractor only, because he was an independent contractor and he loosened the boards in a dangerously deceptive fashion without posting a warning.\nD. The homeowner only, because she insisted on having the old boards removed in a dangerously deceptive fashion and posted no warning.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:56:57.775489+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 15, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.284", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "A", "picked": null, "sampled": "D", "options": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:56:57.775521+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 16, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.263", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A man was driving his new car along a dark road with the car's high-beam headlights on to illuminate the road. When he saw the headlights of another car appear in the distance, he reached to turn the high beams off. Instead of turning from high-beam to low-beam, the headlights on the car turned off completely. The man tried repeatedly to turn the lights on again but could not do so. He collided with the other car and suffered injuries. The man has brought an action against the manufacturer of the headlight controls in his car, the manufacturer of his car, and the retailer who sold him the car. If the man can establish that a defect in the controls caused the accident, from whom can he recover?\nA. Only the manufacturer of the car and the retailer of the car.\nB. Only the manufacturer of the car.\nC. Only the manufacturer of the headlight controls and the manufacturer of the car.\nD. All three defendants.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:56:57.782188+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 17, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.263", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "D", "picked": "D", "sampled": "D", "options": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:56:57.782220+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 18, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.215", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A property owner owns a hotel. When an international charity organization came to town for its annual convention, its members rented 400 of the 500 rooms, and the hotel opened its convention facilities to them. During their convention, the members littered both the inside and the outside of the hotel with debris and bottles. The hotel manager knew that objects were being thrown out of the hotel windows. At his direction, hotel employees patrolled the hallways telling the guests to refrain from such conduct. The owner was out of town and was not aware of the problems which were occurring. During the convention, as a pedestrian walked past the hotel on the sidewalk, he was hit and injured by an ashtray thrown out of a window in the hotel by an unknown person. The pedestrian sued the owner for damages for his injuries. Will the pedestrian prevail in his claim against the owner?\nA. Yes, because a property owner is strictly liable for acts on his premises if such acts cause harm to persons using the adjacent public sidewalks.\nB. Yes, because the person who threw the ashtray cannot be identified.\nC. No, because the owner had no personal knowledge of the conduct of the hotel guests.\nD. No, because the hotel employees had taken reasonable precautions to prevent such an injury.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:56:57.787574+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 19, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.215", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "D", "picked": null, "sampled": "A", "options": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:56:57.787610+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 20, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.54", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A well-known politician was scheduled to address a large crowd at a political dinner. Just as he was about to sit down at the head table, the defendant pushed the politician's chair to one side. As a result, the politician fell to the floor. The politician was embarrassed at being made to look foolish before a large audience but suffered no physical harm. Assume that the defendant knew that the politician was about to sit in the chair before he pushed it. If the politician asserts a claim against the defendant for damages because of his embarrassment, will the politician prevail?\nA. Yes, because the defendant knew that the politician was about to sit on the chair.\nB. Yes, because the defendant negligently failed to notice that the politician would fall.\nC. No, because the politician suffered no physical harm along with his embarrassment.\nD. No, because the defendant intended moving the chair to be a good-natured practical joke on the politician.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:56:58.457498+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 21, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.54", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "A", "picked": null, "sampled": "C", "options": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:56:58.457580+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 22, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.144", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "The owner of a truck leasing company asked one of his employees to deliver $1,000 to the dealership's main office. The following week, as a result of a dispute over whether the money had been delivered, the owner instructed the employee to come to the office to submit to a lie detector test. When the employee reported to the owner's office for the test, it was not administered. Instead, without hearing the employee's story, the owner shouted at him, \"You're a thief!\" and fired him. At the time the owner accused the employee of stealing, the owner believed the charge to be true. The owner's shout was overheard by several other employees who were in another office that was separated from the owner's office by a thin partition. The next day, the employee accepted another job at a higher salary. Several weeks later, upon discovering that the money had not been stolen, the owner offered to rehire the employee. In a suit for slander by the employee against the owner, the employee will\nA. prevail, because the employee was fraudulently induced to go to the office for a lie detector test, which was not, in fact, given.\nB. prevail, because the owner should have foreseen that the statement would be overheard by other employees.\nC. not prevail, because the owner made the charge in good faith, believing it to be true.\nD. not prevail, because the statement was made to the employee alone and intended for his ears only.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:56:58.476028+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 23, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.144", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "B", "picked": "B", "sampled": "B", "options": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:56:58.476107+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 24, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.169", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "The Rapido is a sports car manufactured by the Rapido Motor Co. The Rapido has an excellent reputation for mechanical reliability with one exception; the motor may stall if the engine has not had an extended warm-up. A driver had just begun to drive her Rapido in city traffic without a warm-up when the engine suddenly stalled. A car driven by a motorist rear-ended the driver's car. The driver suffered no external physical injuries as a result of the collision. However, the shock of the crash caused her to suffer a severe heart attack. The driver brought an action against the Rapido Motor Co. based on strict liability in tort. During the trial, the plaintiff presented evidence of an alternative engine design of equal cost that would eliminate the stalling problem without impairing the functions of the engine in any way. The defendant moves for a directed verdict at the close of the evidence. This motion should be\nA. denied, because the jury could find that an unreasonably dangerous defect in the engine was a proximate cause of the collision.\nB. denied, because the jury could find that the Rapido was not crashworthy.\nC. granted, because the motorist's failure to stop within an assured clear distance was a superseding cause of the collision.\nD. granted, because a person of normal senstivity would not have suffered a heart attack under these circumstances.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:56:58.515320+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 25, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.169", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "A", "picked": null, "sampled": "D", "options": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:56:58.515352+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 26, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.9", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A storekeeper who owns a large hardware store sells power saws for both personal and commercial use. He often takes old power saws as trade-ins on new ones. The old power saws are then completely disassembled and rebuilt with new bearings by the storekeeper's employees and sold by the storekeeper as \"reconditioned saws. \"A purchaser, the owner and operator of a cabinet-making shop, informed the storekeeper that he wanted to buy a reconditioned circular saw for use in his cabinet making business. However, the blade that was on the saw he picked out had very coarse teeth for cutting rough lumber. The purchaser told the storekeeper that he wanted a saw blade that would cut plywood. The storekeeper exchanged the coarse blade for a new one with finer teeth that would cut plywood smoothly. The new blade was manufactured by Saw-Blade Company, which uses all available techniques to inspect its products for defects. The reconditioned saw had been manufactured by Power Saw Company. The week after the saw was purchased, the employee, who works for the purchaser in the purchaser's cabinet-making shop, was injured while using the saw. The employee's arm was severely cut. As a result, the cabinetmaking shop was shut down for a week until a replacement for the employee could be found. If the employee was cutting a sheet of plywood, and while he was doing so, the saw blade flew to pieces and severely cut the employee's arm, and if the employee asserts a claim against the storekeeper, the theory on which the employee is most likely to prevail is\nA. strict liability in tort.\nB. express warranty.\nC. negligence, relying on res ipsa loquitur.\nD. negligence, relying on the sale of an inherently dangerous product.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["A. strict liability in tort."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:56:58.525615+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 27, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.9", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "A", "picked": "A", "sampled": "A. strict liability in tort.", "options": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:56:58.525645+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 28, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.25", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "While driving at a speed in excess of the statutory limit, the defendant negligently collided with another car, and the disabled vehicles blocked two of the highway's three northbound lanes. When the plaintiff approached the scene two minutes later, he slowed his car to see if he could help those involved in the collision. As he slowed, he was rear-ended by the driver of another vehicle. The plaintiff, who sustained damage to his car and was seriously injured, brought an action against the defendant to recover damages. The jurisdiction adheres to the traditional common law rules pertaining to contributory negligence. If the defendant moves to dismiss the action for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, should the motion be granted?\nA. Yes, because it was the driver, not the defendant, who collided with the plaintiff's car and caused the plaintiff's injuries.\nB. Yes, because the plaintiff could have safely passed the disabled vehicles in the traffic lane that remained open.\nC. No, because a jury could find that the plaintiff's injury arose from a risk that was a continuing consequence of the defendant's negligence.\nD. No, because the defendant was driving in excess of the statutory limit when he negligently caused the first accident.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:56:58.526890+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 29, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.25", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "C", "picked": "C", "sampled": "C", "options": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:56:58.526917+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 30, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.165", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "The owner of a home in a rural area had for many years enjoyed unspoiled views of the surrounding countryside from her back deck. Several months ago, a neighboring farmer placed unsightly items, including an old, rusted tractor and some machine parts, entirely on his own property, but in a location visible from the homeowner's deck. The homeowner asked the farmer to move the items to a different area of the farm, out of the homeowner's line of sight. The farmer acknowledged that it was not common for farmers in the area to keep old equipment on their land in locations visible to neighbors, but nonetheless refused to move the items. Concerned that the farmer's placement of the items might adversely affect the resale value of the property, the homeowner paid for an appraisal of her own property. The appraisal determined that the market value of the property had not been diminished by the farmer's actions. If the homeowner were to sue the farmer for private nuisance, which of the following would be the farmer's best argument against liability?\nA. The unsightly items have not caused a decrease in the market value of the homeowner's property.\nB. The unsightly items do not physically encroach on the homeowner's property.\nC. It is not common for farmers in the area to keep old equipment on their land in places that are visible to neighbors.\nD. Unsightly conditions ordinarily do not of themselves amount to an unreasonable interference with the use and enjoyment of a neighboring property.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:56:58.536122+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 31, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.165", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "D", "picked": null, "sampled": "A", "options": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:56:58.536149+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 32, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.75", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "In a tavern, an intoxicated woman threatened to slash a man with a broken beer bottle. Another customer, who had not been threatened by the woman, forcefully grabbed the woman and locked her in the tavern's storeroom until the police could arrive. In the process, although the customer used reasonable force, the customer badly sprained the woman's wrist. Is the woman likely to recover in an action against the customer?\nA. No, because the customer's conduct was privileged as a defense of others.\nB. Yes, based on battery only.\nC. Yes, based on false imprisonment only.\nD. Yes, based on both battery and false imprisonment.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:56:58.544182+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 33, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.75", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "A", "picked": null, "sampled": "C", "options": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:56:58.544224+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 34, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.258", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A driver negligently drove his car into a pedestrian, breaking her leg. The pedestrian's leg was put in a cast, and she used crutches to get around. While shopping at her local supermarket, the pedestrian non-negligently placed one of her crutches on a banana peel that had been negligently left on the floor by the manager of the supermarket's produce department. The pedestrian's crutch slipped on the peel, and she fell to the floor, breaking her arm. Had the pedestrian stepped on the banana peel at a time when she did not have to use crutches, she would have regained her balance. The pedestrian sued the driver and the supermarket for her injuries. The pedestrian will be able to recover from\nA. the driver, for her broken leg only.\nB. the driver, for both of her injuries.\nC. the supermarket, for both of her injuries.\nD. the driver, for her broken leg only, and the supermarket, for her broken arm only.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:56:58.551552+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 35, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.258", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "B", "picked": null, "sampled": "D", "options": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:56:58.551579+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 36, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.187", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "Two companies each manufacture pesticide. Their plants are located along the same river. During a specific 24-hour period, each plant discharged pesticide into the river. Both plants were operated negligently and such negligence caused the discharge of pesticide into the river. A rancher operated a cattle ranch downstream from the companies' plants. The rancher's cattle drank from the river and were poisoned by the pesticide. The amount of the discharge from either plant alone would not have been sufficient to cause any harm to the rancher's cattle. If the rancher asserts a claim against the two companies, what, if anything, will the rancher recover?\nA. Nothing, because neither company discharged enough pesticide to cause harm to the rancher's cattle.\nB. Nothing, because the rancher cannot establish how much pesticide each plant discharged.\nC. One-half of the rancher's damages from each company.\nD. The entire amount of the rancher's damages, jointly and severally, from the two companies.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:56:58.572756+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 37, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.187", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "D", "picked": "D", "sampled": "D", "options": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:56:58.572788+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 38, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.234", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A builder purchased a large tract of land intending to construct residential housing on it. The builder hired a contractor to build a large in-ground swimming pool on the tract. The contract provided that the contractor would carry out blasting operations that were necessary to create an excavation large enough for the pool. The blasting caused cracks to form in the walls of the plaintiff's home in a nearby residential neighborhood. In the plaintiff's action for damages against the builder, the plaintiff should\nA. prevail, only if the builder retained the right to direct and control the contractor's construction of the pool.\nB. prevail, because the blasting that the contractor was hired to perform damaged the plaintiff's home.\nC. not prevail, if the contractor used reasonable care in conducting the blasting operations.\nD. not prevail, if the builder used reasonable care to hire a competent contractor.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:56:58.610769+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 39, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.234", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "B", "picked": "B", "sampled": "B", "options": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:56:58.610801+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 40, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.159", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "The plaintiff was eating in a restaurant when he began to choke on a piece of food that had lodged in his throat. A physician who was sitting at a nearby table did not wish to become involved and did not render any assistance, although prompt medical attention would have been effective in removing the obstruction from the plaintiff's throat. Because of the failure to obtain prompt medical attention, the plaintiff suffered severe brain injury from lack of oxygen. If the plaintiff asserts a claim against the physician for his injuries, will the plaintiff prevail?\nA. Yes, because physicians are not liable for malpractice when giving emergency first aid.\nB. Yes, because a reasonably prudent person with the physician's experience, training, and knowledge would have assisted the plaintiff.\nC. No, because the physician was not responsible for the plaintiff's condition.\nD. No, because the physician knew that the plaintiff was substantially certain to sustain serious injury.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:56:59.020641+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 41, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.159", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "C", "picked": null, "sampled": "D", "options": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:56:59.020726+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 42, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.31", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A mining company that operated a copper mine in a remote location kept dynamite in a storage facility at the mine. The storage facility was designed and operated in conformity with state-of-the-art safety standards. In the jurisdiction, the storage of dynamite is deemed an abnormally dangerous activity. Dynamite that was stored in the mining company's storage facility and that had been manufactured by an explosives manufacturer exploded due to an unknown cause. The explosion injured a state employee who was at the mine performing a safety audit. The employee brought an action in strict liability against the mining company. What would be the mining company's best defense?\nA. The mine was in a remote location.\nB. The mining company did not manufacture the dynamite.\nC. The state employee assumed the risk of injury inherent in the job.\nD. The storage facility conformed to state-of-the-art safety standards.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:56:59.205878+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 43, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.31", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "C", "picked": null, "sampled": "D", "options": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:56:59.205956+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 44, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.13", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "In his employment, an employee operates a grinding wheel. To protect his eyes, he wears glasses, sold under the trade name \"Safety Glasses,\" made by a glasses manufacturer. The glasses were sold with a warning label stating that they would protect only against small, flying objects. One day, the grinding wheel that the employee was using disintegrated and fragments of the stone wheel were thrown off with great force. One large fragment hit the employee, knocking his safety glasses up onto his forehead. Another fragment then hit and injured his eye. The employee brought an action against the glasses manufacturer for the injury to his eye. The jurisdiction adheres to the traditional common law rule pertaining to contributory negligence. In this action, will the employee prevail?\nA. Yes, because the safety glasses were defective in that they did not protect him from the disintegrating wheel.\nB. Yes, because the glasses were sold under the trade name \"Safety Glasses. \"\nC. No, because the glasses were not designed or sold for protection against the kind of hazard the employee encountered.\nD. No, if the employee will be compensated under the workers' compensation law.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:56:59.259418+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 45, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.13", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "C", "picked": "C", "sampled": "C", "options": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:56:59.259457+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 46, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.126", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A vintner is the owner of a large vineyard and offers balloon rides to visitors who wish to tour the grounds from the air. During one of the rides, the vintner was forced to make a crash landing on his own property due to high winds. Without the vintner's knowledge or consent, a trespasser had entered the vineyard to camp for a couple of days. The trespasser was injured when he was hit by the basket of the descending balloon. If the trespasser sues the vintner to recover damages for his injuries, will the trespasser prevail?\nA. No, because there is no evidence that the crash landing was made necessary by the vintner's negligence.\nB. No, because the vintner was unaware of the trespasser's presence until after the injury had occurred.\nC. Yes, because even a trespasser may recover for injuries caused by an abnormally dangerous activity.\nD. Yes, because the accident occurred at a place which the vintner knew was frequented by intruders.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:56:59.300182+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 47, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.126", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "B", "picked": null, "sampled": "C", "options": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:56:59.300222+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 48, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.188", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "The defendant hated his former wife for divorcing him and marrying another man a short time thereafter. About a month after his former wife remarried, the defendant secretly entered the couple's rented apartment during their absence by using a master key. The defendant placed a microphone behind the book stand in the bedroom of the apartment, drilled a hole in the nearby wall and poked the wires from the microphone through the hole into the space in the wall, with the result that the microphone appeared to be connected with wires going into the adjoining apartment. Actually the microphone was not connected to anything. The defendant anticipated that his former wife would discover the microphone in a few days and would be upset by the thought that someone had been listening to her conversations with her new husband in their bedroom. Shortly thereafter, as he was putting a book on the stand, the new husband noticed the wires behind the book stand and discovered the hidden microphone. He then called his wife and showed her the microphone and wires. She fainted and, in falling, struck her head on the book stand and suffered a mild concussion. The next day the new husband telephoned the defendant and accused him of planting the microphone. The defendant laughingly admitted it. Because of his concern about his wife and his anger at the defendant, the new husband is emotionally upset and unable to go to work. If the defendant's former wife asserts a claim against the defendant based on infliction of mental distress, the fact that her current husband was the person who showed her the microphone will\nA. relieve the defendant of liability, because the new husband was careless in so doing.\nB. relieve the defendant of liability, because the new husband's conduct was the immediate cause of the wife's harm.\nC. not relieve the defendant of liability, because the defendant's goal was achieved.\nD. not relieve the defendant of liability, because the conduct of a third person is irrelevant in emotional distress cases.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:56:59.307246+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 49, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.188", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "C", "picked": null, "sampled": "D", "options": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:56:59.307293+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 50, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.218", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A trucker was making a delivery to a market on the east side of Maple Street, just north of its intersection with Pine Street. There being insufficient space for his truck and its enclosed trailer, he parked the truck headed north on Maple with the rear of the trailer extending entirely across the crosswalk on the north side of the intersection. The height of the trailer was such that it entirely obscured the traffic light on the northeast corner from the view of traffic moving east on Pine Street. Unknown to the trucker, the traffic light at the southeast corner was not functioning, because a collision 72 hours earlier had knocked down the pole from which the light was suspended. A visitor, on his first trip to the city, was driving east on Pine Street. Not seeing any traffic light or pole, he entered the intersection at a time when the light was red for eastbound traffic and green for northbound traffic. A driver, proceeding north on Maple Street and seeing the green light, entered the intersection without looking for any cross traffic and struck the visitor's car. The driver received personal injuries, and the visitor's car was damaged severely as a result of the impact. State statutes in place make it a misdemeanor to park a motor vehicle so that any part projects into a crosswalk, and to enter an intersection contrary to a traffic signal. If the driver asserts a claim against the city, the theory on which he has the best chance of prevailing is that the city\nA. is strictly liable for harm caused by a defective traffic signal.\nB. was negligent in not replacing the broken pole within 72 hours.\nC. had an absolute duty to maintain installed traffic signals in good operating order.\nD. created a dangerous trap by not promptly replacing the broken pole.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:56:59.317464+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 51, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.218", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "B", "picked": null, "sampled": "A", "options": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:56:59.317519+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 52, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.121", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A shopper slipped and fell in a grocery store, injuring her wrist. In a medical malpractice action against the doctor who treated her, the shopper alleges that the doctor worsened the injury by his treatment. Normally, competent medical treatment would have resulted in a complete cure of the wrist injury. The doctor is seeking to implead the grocery store. The grocery store contends that its alleged negligence was not a proximate cause of any of the injuries allegedly caused by the doctor. Should the court allow the doctor to implead the grocery store?\nA. No, because medical malpractice and the negligence of a possessor of property involve different standards of care.\nB. No, because the alleged negligent acts of the grocery store and the doctor occurred sequentially and not concurrently.\nC. No, because the fact-finder could find that the shopper sustained a single indivisible injury proximately caused by the negligence of both the grocery store and the doctor.\nD. Yes, because the fact-finder could assign some of the responsibility for the shopper's injuries to the grocery store.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:56:59.325538+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 53, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.121", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "D", "picked": null, "sampled": "A", "options": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:56:59.325583+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 54, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.251", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A traveler was a passenger on a commercial aircraft owned and operated by an airline. The aircraft crashed into a mountain, killing everyone on board. The flying weather was good. The traveler's legal representative brought a wrongful death action against the airline. At trial, the legal representative offered no expert or other testimony as to the cause of the crash. On the airline's motion to dismiss at the conclusion of the legal representative's case, the court should\nA. grant the motion, because the legal representative has offered no evidence as to the cause of the crash.\nB. grant the motion, because the legal representative has failed to offer evidence negating the possibility that the crash may have been caused by mechanical failure that the airline could not have prevented.\nC. deny the motion, because the jury may infer that the aircraft crashed due to the airline's negligence.\nD. deny the motion, because in the circumstances common carriers are strictly liable.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:56:59.362387+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 55, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.251", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "C", "picked": null, "sampled": "A", "options": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:56:59.362468+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 56, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.199", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "An eight-year-old child went to the grocery store with her mother. The child pushed the grocery cart while her mother put items into it. The child's mother remained near the child at all times. Another customer in the store noticed the child pushing the cart in a manner that caused the customer no concern. A short time later, the cart the child was pushing struck the customer in the knee, inflicting serious injury. Assume that the child was negligent and the child's mother did not adequately supervise the child. If the customer brings an action, based on negligence, against the child's mother, will the customer prevail?\nA. Yes, because the child was negligent.\nB. Yes, because the child's mother is responsible for any harm caused by the child.\nC. Yes, because the child's mother assumed the risk of her child's actions.\nD. Yes, because the child's mother did not adequately supervise the child's actions.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:56:59.383365+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 57, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.199", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "D", "picked": "D", "sampled": "D", "options": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:56:59.383401+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 58, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.1", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A company operates a brick and stone distribution facility near a residential neighborhood. On the company's property, there is a conveyor belt system with metal sides for loading bricks and stones onto trucks. The trucks being loaded stop on the public road below the conveyor belt. A completely effective method for securing the conveyor belt was available, but the company decided it was not worth the moderate cost. Instead, after closing hours, a wooden barrier was placed on the conveyor belt, and the access ladder was removed to another part of the facility. For several months, however, a group of children, aged eight to 10, had been playing on the company's property and the nearby street after closing hours and had discovered how to use the conveyor belt as a slide. The company was aware of this activity. One evening, as children were playing on the conveyor belt, a driver passing by the conveyor belt hit an eight-year-old girl who slid down in front of the car. The driver applied her brakes, but they suddenly failed, and she hit and injured the child. The driver saw the child in time to have avoided hitting her if her brakes had worked properly. Two days earlier, the driver had taken her car to a mechanic to have her brakes inspected, and the mechanic had told her that the brakes were in perfect condition. Claims were asserted on behalf of the child by her legal representative against the company, the driver, and the mechanic. With respect to the child's claim against the company, will the child prevail?\nA. Yes, because the company could have effectively secured the conveyor belt at a reasonable cost.\nB. Yes, because the company is strictly liable for harm resulting from an artificial condition on its property.\nC. No, because the child was a trespasser.\nD. No, because the driver had the last clear chance to avoid the injury.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:56:59.414224+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 59, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.1", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "A", "picked": "A", "sampled": "A", "options": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:56:59.414257+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 60, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.157", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A company operated an installation for distributing sand and gravel. The installation was adjacent to a residential area. On the company's grounds, there was a chute with polished metal sides for loading sand and gravel into trucks. The trucks being loaded stopped on the public street below the chute. After closing hours, a plywood screen was placed in the chute and the ladder used for inspection was removed to another section of the installation. For several months, however, a number of children, eight to 10 years of age, had been playing on the company's property and the adjoining street after closing hours. The children found the ladder and also discovered that they could remove the plywood screen from the chute and slide down to the street below. The company knew of this activity. One evening, as children were playing in the chute, a commuter driving by the chute hit an eight-year-old boy who slid down in front of the automobile. The commuter applied her brakes, but they suddenly failed, and she hit and injured the child. The commuter saw the child in time to have avoided hitting him if her brakes had worked properly. Two days earlier, the commuter had taken her car to a mechanic to have her brakes inspected, and after a negligent inspection, the mechanic had told her that the brakes were in perfect condition. Claims were asserted on behalf of the child by his proper legal representative against the company, the commuter, and the mechanic. On the child's claim against the mechanic, will the child prevail?\nA. Yes, because the mechanic is strictly liable in tort.\nB. Yes, because the mechanic was negligent in inspecting the commuter's brakes.\nC. No, because the child was in the legal category of a bystander.\nD. No, because the company's conduct was an independent and superseding cause.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:56:59.945652+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 61, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.157", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "B", "picked": "B", "sampled": "B", "options": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:56:59.945691+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 62, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.254", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A homeowner owned a large poisonous snake which had been defanged and was kept in a cage. A storm damaged the homeowner's house and the snake's cage, allowing the snake to escape. During the cleanup after the storm, a volunteer worker came across the snake. The worker tried to run away from the snake and fell, breaking his arm. In a suit by the worker against the homeowner based on strict liability in tort to recover for his injury, will the worker prevail?\nA. No, because the snake's escape was caused by a force of nature.\nB. No, because the worker should have anticipated an injury during his volunteer work.\nC. Yes, because the homeowner did not take adequate precautions to secure the snake.\nD. Yes, because the worker's injury was the result of his fear of the escaped snake.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:00.061062+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 63, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.254", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "D", "picked": null, "sampled": "C", "options": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:00.061233+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 64, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.56", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A 10-year-old boy lived near a company that sold new and used machinery. The company stored discarded machinery, pending sale for scrap, on a large vacant area it owned. This area was unfenced and was one-quarter mile from the housing development where the child lived. The company knew that children frequently played in the area and on the machinery. The child's parents had directed him not to play on the machinery because it was dangerous. One day the child was playing on the press in the company's storage area. The press had several wheels, each geared to the other. The child climbed on the largest wheel, which was about five feet in diameter. The child's weight caused the wheel to rotate, his foot was caught between two wheels that were set in motion, and he was severely injured. A claim for relief was asserted by the child through a duly appointed guardian. The company denied liability and pleaded the child's contributory fault as a defense. In determining whether the company breached a duty to the child, which of the following is the most significant?\nA. Whether the press on which the child was injured was visible from a public way.\nB. Whether the maintenance of the area for the storage of discarded machinery was a private nuisance.\nC. Whether the maintenance of the area for the storage of discarded machinery was a public nuisance.\nD. Whether the company could have eliminated the risk of harm without unduly interfering with the company's normal operations.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:00.069935+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 65, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.56", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "D", "picked": "D", "sampled": "D", "options": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:00.069976+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 66, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.210", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A woman's 12-year-old daughter had some difficulty getting along with other children in the neighborhood, especially with the younger ones. Thinking the experience would be good for her, the woman recommended her daughter to a parent as a babysitter for his five-year-old child but did not mention her daughter's difficulties or her lack of prior experience as a babysitter. The woman and the parents were longstanding social acquaintances. On the evening the daughter was to babysit, the parents told the daughter that she should treat their child firmly, but that it would be preferable not to spank him since he did not take kindly to it. They did not tell the daughter they had experienced trouble retaining babysitters because of their child's temper tantrums. Later in the evening when the child became angry upon being told to go to his room for being naughty, the daughter spanked him, but only moderately hard. The child then threw a hardcover book at the daughter, hitting her in the eye. As the daughter tried to catch the child to take him to his room, the child fled around the house and out the back door, knocking over and breaking an expensive lamp. The backyard was completely dark. The daughter heard the child screaming and banging at the back door, which had closed and locked automatically, but she did nothing. After 20 minutes had passed, she heard a banging and crying at the front door, but still she did nothing. Then the noise stopped. After a few minutes, the daughter went outside and found the child lying on the steps unconscious and injured. If a claim is asserted on behalf of the child against the woman for damages based on her daughter's conduct, the woman will probably be liable, because\nA. parents are vicariously liable for the intentional torts of their children.\nB. she has a nondelegable duty to control the actions of her child.\nC. respondeat superior applies.\nD. she was negligent.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:00.094919+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 67, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.210", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "D", "picked": "D", "sampled": "D", "options": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:00.094979+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 68, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.88", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A 13-year-old girl was operating a high-speed motorboat. The boat was towing a 9-year-old boy in an inner tube tied to the rear of the motorboat by a rope. The rope became tangled around the boy's foot, causing him to suffer severe injuries. In a suit brought on the boy's behalf against the girl, the boy has introduced uncontroverted evidence that the girl drove carelessly in such a way as to entangle the boy in the rope. Is the boy likely to prevail?\nA. No, because the boy assumed the risk.\nB. No, because the girl was too young to be expected to appreciate and avoid the risk she exposed the boy to.\nC. Yes, because children of the girl's age should have the capacity to operate motorboats.\nD. Yes, because the girl will be held to an adult standard of care.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:00.114909+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 69, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.88", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "D", "picked": "D", "sampled": "D", "options": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:00.115003+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 70, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.66", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A homeowner hired an arsonist to set fire to the homeowner's house so that the homeowner could collect the insurance proceeds from the fire. After pouring gasoline around the house, the arsonist lit the fire with his cigarette lighter and then put the lighter in his pocket. As the arsonist was standing back admiring his work, the lighter exploded in his pocket. The arsonist suffered severe burns to his leg. After finding out that the explosion was caused by a manufacturing defect in the lighter, the arsonist brought an action against the manufacturer of the lighter based on strict product liability. Under applicable law, the rules of pure comparative fault apply in such actions. Will the arsonist prevail?\nA. Yes, because the lighter exploded as the result of a defect caused by a manufacturing error.\nB. Yes, because the lighter was the proximate cause of the arsonist's injury.\nC. No, because the lighter was not being used for an intended or reasonably foreseeable purpose.\nD. No, because the arsonist was injured in the course of committing a felony by the device used to perpetrate the felony.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:00.133139+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 71, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.66", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "A", "picked": "A", "sampled": "A", "options": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:00.133178+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 72, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.317", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "Toxic materials being transported by truck from a manufacturer's plant to a warehouse leaked from the truck onto the street a few miles from the plant. A driver lost control of his car when he hit the puddle of spilled toxic materials on the street, and he was injured when his car hit a stop sign. In an action for damages by the driver against the manufacturer based on strict liability, is the driver likely to prevail?\nA. No, because the driver's loss of control was an intervening cause.\nB. No, because the driver's injury did not result from the toxicity of the materials.\nC. Yes, because the manufacturer is strictly liable for leaks of its toxic materials.\nD. Yes, because the leak occurred near the manufacturer's plant.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:00.171166+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 73, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.317", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "B", "picked": "B", "sampled": "B", "options": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:00.171216+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 74, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.140", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "When a tire of a motorist's car suffered a blowout, the car rolled over and the motorist was badly injured. Vehicles made by the manufacturer of the motorist's car have been found to be negligently designed, making them dangerously prone to rolling over when they suffer blowouts. A truck driver who was driving behind the motorist when the accident occurred stopped to help. Rescue vehicles promptly arrived, and the truck driver walked along the side of the road to return to his truck. As he approached his truck, he was struck and injured by a speeding car. The truck driver has sued the manufacturer of the injured motorist's car. Is the truck driver likely to prevail in a suit against the car manufacturer?\nA. No, because the car manufacturer's negligence was not the proximate cause of the truck driver's injuries.\nB. No, because the truck driver assumed the risk of injury when he undertook to help the motorist.\nC. Yes, because it is foreseeable that injuries can result from rollovers.\nD. Yes, because the car manufacturer's negligence caused the dangerous situation that invited the rescue by the truck driver.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:00.173764+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 75, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.140", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "D", "picked": null, "sampled": "A", "options": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:00.173796+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 76, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.236", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "As a pitcher for the City Robins, a professional baseball team, was throwing warm-up pitches on the sidelines during a game, he was continuously heckled by some spectators seated in the stands above the dugout behind a wire mesh fence. On several occasions, the pitcher turned and looked directly at the hecklers with a scowl on his face, but the heckling continued. The pitcher wound up as though he was preparing to pitch in the direction of his catcher; however, the ball traveled from his hand at high speed, at a 90-degree angle from the line to the catcher and directly toward the hecklers in the stands. The ball passed through the wire mesh fence and struck the plaintiff, one of the hecklers. The pitcher had documented anger management issues. The plaintiff brought an action for damages against the pitcher and the City Robins, based upon negligence and battery. The trial court directed a verdict for the defendants on the battery count. The jury found for the defendants on the negligence count because the jury determined that the pitcher could not foresee that the ball would pass through the wire mesh fence. The pitcher's intent was not considered by the court. The plaintiff has appealed the judgments on the battery counts, contending that the trial court erred in directing verdicts for the pitcher and the City Robins. On appeal, the judgment entered on the directed verdict in the pitcher's favor on the battery claim should be\nA. affirmed, because the jury found on the evidence that the pitcher could not foresee that the ball would pass through the fence.\nB. affirmed, because there was evidence that the pitcher was mentally ill and that his act was the product of his mental illness.\nC. reversed and the case remanded, because a jury could find on the evidence that the pitcher intended to cause the hecklers to fear being hit.\nD. reversed and the case remanded, because a jury could find that the pitcher's conduct was extreme and outrageous, and the cause of physical harm to the plaintiff.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:00.209424+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 77, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.236", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "C", "picked": "C", "sampled": "C", "options": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:00.209475+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 78, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.108", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "An automobile company was a small dealer in big new cars and operated a service department. The plaintiff wanted to ask the service manager whether the automobile company would check the muffler on his small foreign car. The plaintiff parked on the street near the service department with the intention of entering that part of the building by walking through one of the three large entrances designed for use by automobiles. There was no street entrance to the service department for individuals, and customers as well as company employees often used one of the automobile entrances. As the plaintiff reached the building, he glanced behind him to be sure no vehicle was approaching that entrance. Seeing none, he walked through the entrance, but immediately he was struck on the back of the head and neck by the large overhead door which was descending. The blow knocked the plaintiff unconscious and caused permanent damage. The plaintiff did not know how the door was raised and lowered; however, the overhead door was operated by the use of either of two switches in the building. One switch was located in the office of the service manager and the other was located near the door in the service work area for the convenience of the mechanics. On this occasion, no one was in the service work area except three mechanics employed by the automobile company. The service manager, who had been in his office, and the three mechanics denied having touched a switch that would have lowered the door. Subsequent investigation showed, however, that the switches were working properly and that all of the mechanisms for moving the door were in good working order. If the plaintiff asserts a claim based on negligence against the automobile company, the plaintiff probably will\nA. recover, because the automobile company is strictly liable under the circumstance.\nB. recover, because an employee of the automobile company was negligent.\nC. not recover, because the plaintiff was a licensee.\nD. not recover, because the plaintiff assumed the risk.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:00.237978+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 79, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.108", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "B", "picked": "B", "sampled": "B", "options": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:00.238140+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 80, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.148", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A construction company contracted to build a laundry for a laundry company on the latter's vacant lot in a residential area. As a part of its work, the construction company dug a trench from the partially completed laundry to the edge of a public sidewalk; waterlines were to be installed in the trench. Because of the contour of the land, the trench was dug to a depth ranging from seven to nine feet. The construction company did not place any barriers around the trench and permitted it to lie open for almost a week while waiting for the delivery of water pipes. This was known to the laundry company, but it raised no objection. During the time the trench was open, a series of heavy rains fell, causing five feet of surface water to gather in the bottom of the trench. While this condition existed, a five-year-old child, who was playing on the vacant lot with friends, stumbled and fell into the trench. An adult passerby, saw this and immediately lowered himself into the trench to rescue the child. However, his doing so caused the rain-soaked walls of the trench to collapse, killing both him and the child. In a claim for wrongful death by the child's administrator against the construction company, the most likely result is that plaintiff will\nA. recover, because the defendant left the open trench unprotected.\nB. recover, because construction companies are strictly liable for inherently dangerous conditions.\nC. not recover, because the child was a trespasser.\nD. not recover, because the child's death was a result of the collapse of the trench, an independent intervening cause.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:00.707206+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 81, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.148", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "A", "picked": "A", "sampled": "A", "options": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:00.707288+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 82, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.155", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A homeowner owns a house in a city. On the lawn in front of his home and within five feet of the public sidewalk there was a large tree. The roots of the tree caused the sidewalk to buckle severely and become dangerous. An ordinance of the city requires adjacent landowners to keep sidewalks in a safe condition. The homeowner engaged a contractor to repair the sidewalk, leaving it to the contractor to decide how the repair should be made. The contractor dug up the sidewalk, cut back the roots of the tree, and laid a new sidewalk. Two days after the homeowner had paid the contractor the agreed price of the repair, the tree fell over onto the street and damaged a parked car belonging to a driver. The driver has asserted claims against the homeowner and the contractor, and both defendants admit that cutting the roots caused the tree to fall. The homeowner also admitted that he was aware of the dangerous manner in which the contractor was performing the repairs. The theory on which the driver is most likely to prevail against the homeowner is that the homeowner is\nA. strictly liable, because the tree was on his property.\nB. liable for the contractor's negligence because the homeowner knew the contractor was engaged in a dangerous activity.\nC. liable, because he assumed responsibility when he paid the contractor for the repair.\nD. liable on the basis of respondeat superior.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:00.847046+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 83, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.155", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "B", "picked": "B", "sampled": "B", "options": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:00.847124+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 84, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.332", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A driver, returning home from a long work shift at a factory, fell asleep at the wheel and lost control of his car. As a result, his car collided with a police car driven by an officer who was returning to the station after having responded to an emergency. The officer was injured in the accident and later sued the driver in negligence for her injuries. The driver has moved for summary judgment, arguing that the common law firefighters' rule bars the suit. Should the court grant the motion?\nA. No, because the firefighters' rule does not apply to police officers.\nB. No, because the police officer's injuries were not related to any special dangers of her job.\nC. Yes, because the accident would not have occurred but for the emergency.\nD. Yes, because the police officer was injured on the job.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:00.874362+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 85, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.332", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "B", "picked": "B", "sampled": "B", "options": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:00.874439+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 86, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.189", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A real estate developer was trying to purchase land on which he intended to build a large commercial development. An elderly widow had rejected all of the developer's offers to buy her ancestral home, where she had lived all her life and which was located in the middle of the developer's planned development. Finally, the developer offered her $250,000, which was the fair market value of the property. He also knowingly lied to the widow and told her that if she rejected it, state law authorized him to have her property condemned. The widow then consulted her nephew, a law student, who researched the question and advised her that the developer had no power of condemnation under state law. The widow had been badly frightened by the developer's threat, and was outraged when she learned that the developer had lied to her. If the widow asserts a claim based on misrepresentation against the developer, will she prevail?\nA. Yes, because the developer knew he had no legal power of condemnation.\nB. Yes, because the developer tried to take unfair advantage of a gross indifference between himself and the widow in commercial knowledge and experience.\nC. No, because the developer's offer of $250,000 equaled the market value of the widow's property.\nD. No, because the widow suffered no pecuniary loss.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:00.900006+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 87, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.189", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "D", "picked": null, "sampled": "A", "options": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:00.900052+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 88, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.333", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A truck driver was driving along a lonely road on a very cold night. He saw a man lying in a field by the side of the road and apparently injured. The driver stopped his truck, alighted, and, upon examination, discovered that the man was intoxicated and in danger of suffering from exposure to the cold. However, the driver returned to his truck and drove away without making any effort to help the man, who remained lying at the same place and was later injured when struck by a car driven by a traveler who, drowsy and inattentive, had veered off the road into the field and hit him. The traveler did not see the man prior to hitting him. If the man asserts a claim against the truck driver for damages for his injuries, will the man prevail?\nA. Yes, because by stopping and examining the man, the truck driver assumed a duty to aid him.\nB. Yes, because a reasonably prudent person under the circumstances would have aided the man.\nC. No, because the truck driver did not, in any way, make the man's situation worse.\nD. No, because the man himself created the risk of harm by becoming intoxicated.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:00.942756+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 89, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.333", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "C", "picked": null, "sampled": "B", "options": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:00.942796+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 90, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.285", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A homeowner hired a contractor to remodel her kitchen. She had learned of him through a classified advertisement he placed in the local newspaper. During the telephone conversation in which she hired him, he stated he was experienced and qualified to do all necessary work. Because of his low charge for his work, they agreed in writing that on acceptance of his job by the homeowner, he would have no further liability to her or to anyone else for any defects in materials or workmanship, and that she would bear all such costs. The homeowner purchased a dishwasher manufactured by a large company from a dealer, who was in the retail electrical appliance business. The washer was sold by the dealer with only the manufacturer's warranty and with no warranty by the dealer; the manufacturing company restricted its warranty to 90 days on parts and labor. The contractor installed the dishwasher. Two months after the homeowner accepted the entire job, she was conversing in her home with an accountant, an acquaintance who had agreed to prepare her income tax return gratuitously. As they talked, they noticed that the dishwasher was operating strangely, repeatedly stopping and starting. At the homeowner's request, the accountant gave it a cursory examination and, while inspecting it, received a violent electrical shock which did him extensive harm. The dishwasher had an internal wiring defect which allowed electrical current to be carried into the framework and caused the machine to malfunction. The machine had not been adequately grounded by the contractor during installation; if it had been, the current would have been led harmlessly away. The machine carried instructions for correct grounding, which the contractor had not followed. If the accountant asserts a claim based on strict liability against the manufacturing company for damages, the probable result is that the accountant will\nA. recover, because the dishwasher was defectively made.\nB. recover, because the company that manufactured the dishwasher is vicariously liable for the improper installation.\nC. not recover, because he assumed the risk by inspecting the machine.\nD. not recover, because he was not the purchaser.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:00.943315+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 91, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.285", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "A", "picked": "A", "sampled": "A", "options": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:00.943344+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 92, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.119", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A college student purchased a large bottle of No-Flake dandruff shampoo, manufactured by a shampoo company. The box containing the bottle stated in part: \"CAUTION - Use only one capful at most once a day. Greater use may cause severe damage to the scalp. \" The college student read the writing on the box, removed the bottle, and threw the box away. The college student's roommate asked to use the No-Flake, and college student said, \"Be careful not to use too much. \" The roommate thereafter used No-Flake twice a day, applying two or three capfuls each time, notwithstanding the label statement that read: \"Use no more than one capful per day. See box instructions. \" The more he used No-Flake, the more inflamed his scalp became, the more it itched, and the more he used. After three weeks of such use, the roommate finally consulted a doctor who diagnosed his problem as a serious and irreversible case of dermatitis caused by excessive exposure to the active ingredients in No-Flake. These ingredients are uniquely effective at controlling dandruff, but there is no way to remove a remote risk to a small percentage of persons who may contract dermatitis as the result of applying, for prolonged periods of time, amounts of No-Flake substantially in excess of the directions. This jurisdiction adheres to the traditional common law rules pertaining to contributory negligence and assumption of risk. Based upon the foregoing facts, if the roommate sues the shampoo company to recover damages for his dermatitis, his most promising theory of liability will be that the No-Flake shampoo\nA. had an unreasonably dangerous manufacturing defect.\nB. had an unreasonably dangerous design defect.\nC. was inherently dangerous.\nD. was inadequately labeled to warn of its dangers.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:00.976803+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 93, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.119", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "D", "picked": "D", "sampled": "D", "options": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:00.976851+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 94, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.178", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "The defendant was a pitcher for the City Robins, a professional baseball team. While the defendant was throwing warm-up pitches on the sidelines during a game, he was continuously heckled by some spectators seated in the stands above the dugout behind a wire mesh fence. On several occasions, the defendant turned and looked directly at the hecklers with a scowl on his face, but the heckling continued. The defendant wound up as though he was preparing to pitch in the direction of his catcher; however the ball traveled from his hand at high speed, at a 90-degree angle from the line to the catcher and directly toward the hecklers in the stands. The ball passed through the wire mesh fence and struck the plaintiff, one of the hecklers. The plaintiff brought an action for damages against the defendant and the City Robins, based upon negligence and battery. The trial court directed a verdict for the defendant and the City Robins on the battery count. The jury found for the defendant and the City Robins on the negligence count because the jury determined that the defendant could not foresee that the ball would pass through the wire mesh fence. The plaintiff has appealed the judgments on the battery counts, contending that the trial court erred in directing verdicts for the defendant and the City Robins. On appeal, the court holds that the question of whether the defendant committed a battery is a jury issue. The judgment entered on the directed verdict in favor of the City Robins should then be\nA. reversed and the case remanded, because a jury could find the City Robins vicariously liable for a battery committed by the defendant in the course of his employment.\nB. reversed and the case remanded, because a jury could find negligence on the part of the Robins' management.\nC. affirmed, because an employer is not vicariously liable for a servant's battery.\nD. affirmed, because the defendant's act was a knowing violation of team rules.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:01.005185+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 95, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.178", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "A", "picked": "A", "sampled": "A", "options": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:01.005232+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 96, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.127", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A city ordinance makes it unlawful to park a motor vehicle on a city street within 10 feet of a fire hydrant. At 1:55 p. m. a man, realizing he must be in the bank before it closed at 2:00 p.m., and finding no other space available, parked his automobile in front of a fire hydrant on a city street. The man then hurried into the bank, leaving his aged neighbor as a passenger in the rear seat of the car. About five minutes later, and while the man was still in the bank, a driver was driving down the street. The driver swerved to avoid what he mistakenly thought was a hole in the street and sideswiped the man's car. The man's car was turned over on top of the hydrant, breaking the hydrant and causing a small flood of water. The man's car was severely damaged and the neighbor was badly injured. There is no applicable guest statute. If the man asserts a claim against the driver for damage to the man's automobile, the most likely result is that the man will\nA. recover, because the purpose of the ordinance is to provide access to the fire hydrant.\nB. recover, because the driver's negligence was later in time than the man's act of parking.\nC. not recover, because the man was contributorily negligent as a matter of law.\nD. not recover, because the man's action in parking unlawfully was a continuing wrong.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:01.059699+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 97, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.127", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "A", "picked": null, "sampled": "D", "options": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:01.059734+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 98, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.151", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "The defendant operates a residential rehabilitation center for emotionally disturbed and ungovernable children who have been committed to his custody by their parents or by juvenile authorities. Though the children are not permitted to leave the center without his permission, there are no bars or guards to prevent them from doing so. It has been held in the state where the center is located that persons having custody of children have the same duties and responsibilities that they would have if they were the parents of the children. A child, aged 12, who had been in the defendant's custody for six months, left the center without permission. The defendant became aware of the child's absence almost immediately, but made no attempt to locate him or secure his return, though reports reached him that the child had been seen in the vicinity. 36 hours after the child left the center, the child committed a brutal assault upon the plaintiff, a five-year-old child, causing the plaintiff to suffer extensive permanent injury. The defendant had no reason to suspect that the child had a propensity to attack younger children. If an action is brought against the defendant on behalf of the plaintiff to recover damages for the plaintiff's injuries, will the plaintiff prevail?\nA. No, because parents are not personally liable for their child's intentional torts.\nB. Yes, because the child was old enough to be liable for battery.\nC. Yes, because the child was in the defendant's custody.\nD. No, because the defendant did not know or have reason to know that the child had a propensity to attack younger children.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:01.118633+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 99, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.151", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "D", "picked": null, "sampled": "C", "options": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:01.118687+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 100, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.334", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A well-known movie star was drinking Vineyard wine at a nightclub. A bottle of the Vineyard wine, with its label plainly showing, was on the table in front of the actor. An amateur photographer asked the actor if he could take his picture and the actor said, \"Yes. \" Subsequently, the photographer sold the photo to Vineyard. Vineyard, without the actor's consent, used the photo in a wine advertisement in a nationally circulated magazine. The caption below the photo stated that the actor \"enjoys his Vineyard wine. \"If the actor sues Vineyard to recover damages as a result of Vineyard's use of the photograph, will the actor prevail?\nA. No, because the actor consented to being photographed.\nB. No, because the actor is a public figure.\nC. Yes, because Vineyard made commercial use of the photograph.\nD. Yes, unless the actor did, in fact, enjoy his Vineyard wine.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:01.273132+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 101, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.334", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "C", "picked": "C", "sampled": "C", "options": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:01.273189+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 102, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.38", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A storekeeper who owns a large hardware store sells power saws for both personal and commercial use. He often takes old power saws as trade-ins on new ones. The old power saws are then completely disassembled and rebuilt with new bearings by the storekeeper's employees and sold by the storekeeper as \"reconditioned saws. \"A purchaser, the owner and operator of a cabinet-making shop, informed the storekeeper that he wanted to buy a reconditioned circular saw for use in his cabinet making business. However, the blade that was on the saw he picked out had very coarse teeth for cutting rough lumber. The purchaser told the storekeeper that he wanted a saw blade that would cut plywood. The storekeeper exchanged the coarse blade for a new one with finer teeth that would cut plywood smoothly. The new blade was manufactured by Saw-Blade Company, which uses all available techniques to inspect its products for defects. The reconditioned saw had been manufactured by Power Saw Company. The week after the saw was purchased, the employee, who works for the purchaser in the purchaser's cabinet-making shop, was injured while using the saw. The employee's arm was severely cut. As a result, the cabinetmaking shop was shut down for a week until a replacement for the employee could be found. If the employee was cutting a sheet of hard plastic, and while he was doing so, the saw blade flew to pieces and severely cut the employee's arm, and if the employee asserts a claim based on strict liability in tort against Saw-Blade Company, the defense most likely to prevail is:\nA. The employee did not purchase the saw blade.\nB. The blade was being put to an improper use.\nC. The employee was contributorily negligent in using the blade to cut hard plastic.\nD. Saw-Blade Company used every available means to inspect the blade for defects.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:01.464379+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 103, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.38", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "B", "picked": "B", "sampled": "B", "options": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:01.464429+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 104, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.292", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A landowner hired a tree specialist to cut down four trees, which he pointed out to the specialist before the specialist began work. Although the landowner reasonably believed that all the trees were on his property, three of the trees that were cut down were in fact on a neighbor's property. Who, if anyone, is liable to the landowner's neighbor for conversion?\nA. Both the tree specialist and the landowner.\nB. Neither the tree specialist nor the landowner.\nC. The landowner only.\nD. The tree specialist only.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:01.618778+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 105, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.292", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "A", "picked": "A", "sampled": "A", "options": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:01.618876+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 106, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.166", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "An eight-year-old child had a habit of riding his bicycle onto a busy highway. His parents knew about this habit but continued to let the child ride his bicycle. One afternoon, the child rode his bicycle down his driveway onto the busy highway and a driver had to stop her car suddenly to avoid colliding with the bike. Because of the sudden stop, the driver's son, who was sitting on the seat without any restraint, was thrown into the dashboard and injured. Had the driver's son been properly restrained in a baby car seat, as required by a state safety statute of which his mother was aware, he would not have been injured. In an action brought on behalf of the driver's son against the child's parents to recover for the son's injuries, the driver's son will\nA. not prevail, because parents are not vicariously liable for the negligent acts of their children.\nB. not prevail, because the driver's son's injury was attributable to his mother's knowing violation of a safety statute.\nC. prevail, because the child's parents knew that he sometimes rode into the highway, and they took no steps to prevent it.\nD. prevail, because the child's riding into the highway was negligent and the proximate cause of the driver's son's injuries.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:01.689099+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 107, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.166", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "C", "picked": "C", "sampled": "C", "options": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:01.689234+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 108, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.315", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A driver was injured when one of the tires on her car ruptured, causing the car to veer off the road. The rupture resulted from a defect in the tire that existed at the time it was sold by the manufacturer to a retailer, who sold it to the driver and installed it on her car. The driver sued the manufacturer on a strict products liability theory. During discovery, the driver's attorney obtained a memorandum that had circulated among engineers employed by the manufacturer. The memorandum acknowledged that undetectable defects would cause ruptures in approximately one out of every 10,000 tires sold. The manufacturer sells approximately 10 million tires per year. After discovering this memorandum, the driver's attorney filed a timely amended complaint, adding a claim for battery. The manufacturer has moved for partial summary judgment, seeking dismissal of the battery claim, based on the undisputed facts set out above. If no additional facts are provided to the court concerning the risk of tire rupture, should the court grant the motion?\nA. No, because the evidence would permit a reasonable jury to conclude that a responsible manufacturer would have taken greater care to prevent ruptures.\nB. No, because the evidence would permit a reasonable jury to conclude that the manufacturer knew to a substantial certainty that consumers would be injured by tire ruptures.\nC. Yes, because a battery claim is inconsistent with a claim for strict products liability.\nD. Yes, because the driver cannot establish that the manufacturer intended or knew to a substantial certainty that its placement of the tire into the stream of commerce would cause her to suffer a harmful or offensive contact.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:01.692607+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 109, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.315", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "D", "picked": "D", "sampled": "D", "options": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:01.692704+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 110, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.280", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A buyer bought a large, nicely kept house near a university campus. She was able to buy the house for a very good price because it was located directly across the street from a fraternity house known for its frequent late-night parties. The buyer knew of the fraternity's reputation before she bought the house. The reputation was well deserved, and the buyer found the noise from the parties extremely unpleasant and disruptive. The buyer has asked an attorney for legal advice regarding a possible nuisance claim against the fraternity. Which of the following responses would best express the applicable law?\nA. \"You have no nuisance claim, because the fraternity members have the right to use their property as they please. \"\nB. \"You have no nuisance claim, because you came to the nuisance. \"\nC. \"You might have a nuisance claim, but the fact that you bought the house fully aware of the fraternity's habitual late-night activities will count against your claim and could help defeat it. \"\nD. \"You will be able to recover damages in a nuisance action, because the late-night activities of the fraternity members violate your right to the quiet enjoyment of your property. \"\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:01.724457+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 111, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.280", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "C", "picked": "C", "sampled": "C", "options": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:01.724566+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 112, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.278", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "During a comprehensive evaluation of an adult patient's psychiatric condition, a psychiatrist failed to diagnose the patient's suicidal state. One day after the misdiagnosis, the patient committed suicide. The patient's father, immediately after having been told of his son's suicide, suffered severe emotional distress, which resulted in a stroke. The patient's father was not present at the patient's appointment with the psychiatrist, nor did he witness the suicide. The father has brought an action against the psychiatrist to recover for his severe emotional distress and the resulting stroke. Is the father likely to prevail?\nA. No, because the father did not sustain a physical impact.\nB. No, because the psychiatrist's professional duty did not extend to the harms suffered by the patient's father.\nC. Yes, because the father was a member of the patient's immediate family.\nD. Yes, because the psychiatrist reasonably could have foreseen that a misdiagnosis would result in the patient's suicide and the resulting emotional distress of the patient's father.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:01.755339+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 113, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.278", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "B", "picked": null, "sampled": "A", "options": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:01.755461+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 114, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.300", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A patient received anesthesia while giving birth. Upon awakening from the anesthesia, she discovered a severe burn on the inner portion of her right knee. The patient has brought a medical malpractice action in which she has joined all of the physicians and nurses who exercised control over her person, the delivery room, the medical procedures, and the equipment used during the period in which she was unconscious. The defendants have jointly moved for summary judgment. The patient has produced affidavits that establish that the applicable professional standard of care was violated. What would be the patient's best argument against the motion?\nA. At least one of the defendants had control over whatever agency or instrumentality caused the patient's injury.\nB. The defendants were acting in concert.\nC. The patient has produced affidavits that establish that the applicable professional standard of care was violated.\nD. The patient was in no way responsible for her injury.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:01.775587+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 115, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.300", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "A", "picked": "A", "sampled": "A", "options": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:01.775746+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 116, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.138", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A rancher and his neighbor were involved in a boundary dispute. In order to resolve their differences, each drove his truck to an open pasture area on his land where the two properties were separated by a fence. The rancher was accompanied by four friends, and the neighbor was alone. The neighbor got out of his truck and walked toward the fence. The rancher got out but simply stood by his truck. When the neighbor came over the fence, the rancher shot him, inflicting serious injury. In a battery action brought by the neighbor against the rancher, the rancher testified that he actually thought his neighbor was armed, although he could point to nothing that would have reasonably justified this belief. Is the neighbor likely to prevail?\nA. No, because the rancher was standing on his own property and had no obligation to retreat.\nB. No, because the rancher suspected that the neighbor was armed.\nC. Yes, because deadly force is never appropriate in a property dispute.\nD. Yes, because it was unreasonable for the rancher to consider the use of a gun necessary for self-defense.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:01.807975+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 117, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.138", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "D", "picked": "D", "sampled": "D", "options": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:01.808050+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 118, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.212", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A patient who had suffered a severe fracture of her leg was treated by an orthopedist, who set the patient's leg and put it in a cast. When the leg continued to bother the patient six months later, she consulted a second orthopedist in the same town. The second orthopedist surgically inserted a pin to facilitate healing. The patient brought a malpractice action against the first orthopedist, claiming that he should have surgically inserted a pin at the time of initial treatment. The only evidence that the patient offered in support of her malpractice claim was the testimony of the second orthopedist, as follows:In response to the question \"Would you have inserted a pin initially?\" the second orthopedist testified, \"I personally would not have been satisfied that the leg would heal properly without a pin. \"At the close of the patient's evidence, the first orthopedist moved for judgment as a matter of law. &nbsp;Should the motion be granted?\nA. No, because the patient has introduced evidence that the first orthopedist failed to give the care that the second orthopedist would have provided.\nB. No, because the second orthopedist practices in the same town and field of specialty as the first orthopedist.\nC. Yes, because the patient has failed to introduce evidence that the first orthopedist's care fell below the professional standard of care.\nD. Yes, because the second orthopedist also treated the patient and is thus not sufficiently objective to offer expert testimony.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:01.870201+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 119, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.212", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "C", "picked": "C", "sampled": "C", "options": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:01.870317+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 120, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.80", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A patient had been under the care of a cardiologist for three years prior to submitting to an elective operation that was performed by a surgeon. Two days thereafter, the patient suffered a stroke, resulting in a coma, caused by a blood clot which formed after the operation. When it appeared that she had entered a permanent vegetative state, with no hope of recovery, the artificial life-support system that had been provided was withdrawn, and she died a few hours later. The withdrawal of artificial life support had been requested by her family, and duly approved by a court. The surgeon was not involved in that decision, or in its execution. The administrator of the patient's estate thereafter filed a wrongful death action against the surgeon, claiming that the surgeon was negligent in having failed to consult a cardiologist prior to the operation. At the trial the plaintiff offered evidence that accepted medical practice would require examination of the patient by a cardiologist prior to the type of operation that the surgeon performed. In this action, the plaintiff should\nA. prevail, because the surgeon was negligent in failing to have the patient examined by a cardiologist prior to the operation.\nB. prevail, because the blood clot that caused the patient's death was caused by the operation which the surgeon performed.\nC. not prevail, because there is no evidence that a cardiologist would have provided advice that would have changed the outcome if one had examined the patient before the operation.\nD. not prevail, because the surgeon had nothing to do with the withdrawal of artificial life support, which was the cause of the patient's death.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:01.953055+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 121, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.80", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "C", "picked": null, "sampled": "A", "options": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:01.953106+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 122, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.4", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A woman was exiting an escalator when it suddenly malfunctioned and dropped several inches, causing her to fall. An investigation of the accident revealed that the escalator malfunctioned due to negligent maintenance by an escalator service company. The service company had a contract with the owner of the building to inspect and maintain the escalator. The woman's fall significantly worsened a preexisting medical condition. If the woman sues the escalator service company for damages for her injuries, she should recover\nA. damages for the injury caused by the malfunctioning escalator, including the aggravation of her preexisting medical condition.\nB. damages for the full amount of her worsened condition, because a tortfeasor must take its victim as it finds her.\nC. nothing, because the accident would not have caused significant harm to an ordinarily prudent escalator passenger.\nD. nothing, because the service company could not reasonably have been expected to foresee the extent of harm that the woman suffered as a result of the accident.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:02.250136+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 123, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.4", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "A", "picked": "A", "sampled": "A", "options": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:02.250220+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 124, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.71", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A married couple bought a new recreational vehicle (RV) to travel in. After the couple brought the RV home, but before they had moved any personal property into it, the RV spontaneously caught fire and was completely destroyed. Does the couple have a viable strict products liability claim against the manufacturer of the RV?\nA. No, because the damage was only to the RV itself.\nB. No, because there is no indication that the manufacturer was negligent.\nC. Yes, because a new RV will not spontaneously catch fire in the absence of negligence by its manufacturer.\nD. Yes, because the RV was obviously defective and the manufacturer should be held strictly liable for the damage caused by the defect.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:02.477048+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 125, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.71", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "A", "picked": null, "sampled": "D", "options": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:02.477171+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 126, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.219", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A real estate developer was trying to purchase land on which he intended to build a large commercial development. An elderly widow had rejected all of the developer's offers to buy her ancestral home, where she had lived all her life and which was located in the middle of the developer's planned development. Finally, the developer offered her $250,000. He told her that if she rejected it, state law authorized him to have her property condemned. He subsequently parked a bulldozer in front of her house. The widow then consulted her nephew, a law student, who researched the question and advised her that the developer had no power of condemnation under state law. The widow had been badly frightened by the developer's threat, and was outraged when she learned that the developer had lied to her. If the widow sues the developer for damages for emotional distress, will she prevail?\nA. Yes, because the developer's action was extreme and outrageous.\nB. Yes, because the widow was frightened and outraged.\nC. No, because the widow did not suffer emotional distress that was severe.\nD. No, because it was not the developer's purpose to cause emotional distress.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:02.546569+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 127, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.219", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "C", "picked": null, "sampled": "A", "options": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:02.546610+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 128, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.33", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A plaintiff's three-year-old daughter was killed in an automobile accident. At the plaintiff's direction, the child's body was taken to a mausoleum for interment. Normally, the mausoleum's vaults are permanently sealed with marble plates secured by \"tamper-proof\" screws. After the child's body was placed in a mausoleum, however, only a fiberglass panel secured by caulking compound covered her vault. About a month later, the child's body was discovered in a cemetery located near the mausoleum. It had apparently been left there by vandals who had taken it from the mausoleum. As a result of this experience, the plaintiff suffered great emotional distress. If the plaintiff sues the mausoleum for the damages arising from her emotional distress, will she prevail?\nA. No, because the plaintiff experienced no threat to her own safety.\nB. No, because the mausoleum's behavior was not extreme and outrageous.\nC. Yes, because the mausoleum failed to use reasonable care to safeguard the body.\nD. No, because the plaintiff suffered no physical harm as a consequence of her emotional distress.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:02.564005+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 129, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.33", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "C", "picked": "C", "sampled": "C", "options": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:02.564053+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 130, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.104", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A man sued his neighbor for defamation based on the following facts:The neighbor told a friend that the man had set fire to a house in the neighborhood. The friend, who knew the man well, did not believe the neighbor's allegation, which was in fact false. The friend told the man about the neighbor's allegation. The man was very upset by the allegation, but neither the man nor the neighbor nor the friend communicated the allegation to anyone else. Should the man prevail in his lawsuit?\nA. No, because the friend did not believe what the neighbor had said.\nB. No, because the man cannot prove that he suffered pecuniary loss.\nC. Yes, because the man was very upset at hearing what the neighbor had said.\nD. Yes, because the neighbor communicated to the friend the false accusation that the man had committed a serious crime.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:02.566505+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 131, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.104", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "D", "picked": "D", "sampled": "D", "options": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:02.566535+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 132, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.152", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A chemical company designed and built a large tank on its premises for the purpose of storing highly toxic gas. The tank developed a sudden leak and escaping toxic gas drifted into the adjacent premises where a neighbor lived. The neighbor inhaled the gas and died as a result. In a suit brought by the neighbor's personal representative against the chemical company, which of the following must be established if the claim is to prevail?\nA. The toxic gas that escaped from the chemical company's premises was the cause of the neighbor's death.\nB. The tank was built in a defective manner and the toxic gas that escaped from the chemical company's premises was the cause of the neighbor's death.\nC. The chemical company was negligent in designing the tank and the toxic gas that escaped from the chemical company's premises was the cause of the neighbor's death.\nD. The chemical company was negligent in designing the tank, the tank was built in a defective manner, and the toxic gas that escaped from the chemical company's premises was the cause of the neighbor's death.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:02.573053+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 133, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.152", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "A", "picked": "A", "sampled": "A", "options": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:02.573095+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 134, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.102", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A plaintiff and a man were passengers sitting in adjoining seats on a flight on an airline. There were many empty seats on the aircraft. During the flight, a flight attendant served the man nine drinks. As the man became more and more obviously intoxicated and attempted to engage the plaintiff in a conversation, the plaintiff chose to ignore the man instead of changing seats. This angered the man, who suddenly struck the plaintiff in the face, giving him a black eye. The flight attendant had witnessed the man becoming violent but chose to not get involved. If the plaintiff asserts a claim for damages against the airline based on negligence, the plaintiff will\nA. not recover, because a person is not required by law to come to the assistance of another who is imperiled by a third party.\nB. not recover, because the plaintiff could easily have moved to another seat.\nC. recover, because a common carrier is strictly liable for injuries suffered by a passenger while aboard the carrier.\nD. recover, because the flight attendants should have perceived the man's condition and acted to protect the plaintiff before the blow was struck.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:02.581803+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 135, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.102", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "D", "picked": "D", "sampled": "D", "options": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:02.581843+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 136, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.301", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "When a defendant heard that his neighbor intended to sell his home to a minority purchaser, the defendant told his neighbor that the neighbor and his wife and children would meet with \"accidents\" if he did so. The neighbor then called the prospective purchaser and told him that he was taking the house off the market. If the neighbor asserts a claim against the defendant for assault, the neighbor will\nA. recover because the defendant intended to place the neighbor in fear of physical harm.\nB. recover because the defendant's conduct was extreme and outrageous.\nC. not recover because the defendant took no action that threatened immediate physical harm to the neighbor.\nD. not recover because the neighbor's action removed any threat of harmful force.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:02.633440+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 137, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.301", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "C", "picked": null, "sampled": "B", "options": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:02.633528+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 138, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.154", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A labor leader in a city was divorced 10 years ago. Both he and his first wife have since married other persons. Recently, a newspaper in another city ran a feature article on improper influences it asserted had been used by labor officials to secure favorable rulings from government officials. The story said that, before the couple's divorce, the labor leader's first wife, with his knowledge and concurrence, gave sexual favors to the mayor of the city and then persuaded him to grant concessions to the labor leader's union, with which the city was then negotiating a labor contract. The story named the labor leader and identified his first wife by her former and current surnames. The reporter for the newspaper believed the story to be true since it had been related to him by two very reliable sources. However, after publication, the story turned out to be false. The labor leader's first wife suffered emotional distress and became very depressed. If she asserts a claim based on defamation against the newspaper, she will\nA. prevail, because the story concerned her personal, private life.\nB. prevail, because the story was false.\nC. not prevail, because the newspaper did not print the story with knowledge of its falsity or with reckless disregard for its truth or falsity.\nD. not prevail, because the newspaper exercised ordinary care in determining the story was true or false.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:02.669188+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 139, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.154", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "D", "picked": null, "sampled": "C", "options": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:02.669242+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 140, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.48", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A college student was asleep in his bed in a college dormitory when his roommate, in a drunken fury, entered their room intending to attack the student with an ice pick while he slept. Fortunately, the phone rang and awakened the student. The roommate retreated quickly and threw the ice pick under his own bed in the same room. The next day, the student heard from friends about the roommate's murderous plans and later found the ice pick under the roommate's bed. Even though the college expelled his roommate, the student remained extremely upset and afraid to sleep. In a suit against the roommate for assault, will the student prevail?\nA. No, because the roommate did not touch the student.\nB. No, because the student was not awake when the roommate entered the room and was unaware until later that the roommate was intending to attack him.\nC. Yes, because it was reasonable for the student to feel afraid of sleeping in his room afterward.\nD. Yes, because the roommate intended to inflict serious harm.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:02.835915+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 141, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.48", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "B", "picked": null, "sampled": "D", "options": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:02.835983+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 142, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.201", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A farmer kept antiques in an uninhabited farmhouse on his property. The farmhouse had been broken into several times in the past, and some of the farmer's goods had been stolen. Instead of posting \"No Trespassing\" signs, the farmer decided to install an alarm system to deter intruders. While the farmer was in the farmhouse installing the alarm system, he heard a window open in the adjoining room. The farmer crept very quietly to the door of the room, threw the door open, and found an intruder, a young child. The farmer immediately struck the child, a 10-year-old girl, very hard in the face, breaking her nose. In an action on behalf of the child against the farmer to recover for the injury to her nose, is the child likely to prevail?\nA. No, because the farmer did not use deadly force.\nB. No, because the farmer had probable cause to believe that the child was a thief.\nC. Yes, because the farmer should have posted a \"No Trespassing\" sign.\nD. Yes, because the farmer used excessive force.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:03.016511+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 143, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.201", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "D", "picked": "D", "sampled": "D", "options": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:03.016551+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 144, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.122", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A bank vice president took substantial kickbacks to approve certain loans that later proved worthless. Upon learning of the kickbacks, the bank's president fired the vice president, telling him, \"If you are not out of this bank in 10 minutes, I will have the guards physically throw you out. \" The vice president left at once. If the vice president asserts a claim against the president based on assault, will the vice president prevail?\nA. No, because the guards never touched the vice president.\nB. No, because the president gave the vice president 10 minutes to leave.\nC. Yes, because the president intended to cause the vice president severe emotional distress.\nD. Yes, because the president threatened the vice president with a harmful or offensive bodily contact.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:03.314556+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 145, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.122", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "B", "picked": "B", "sampled": "B", "options": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:03.314589+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 146, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.294", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "Because of a farmer's default on his loan, the bank foreclosed on the farm and equipment that secured the loan. Among the items sold at the resulting auction was a new tractor recently delivered to the farmer by the retailer. Shortly after purchasing the tractor at the auction, the buyer was negligently operating the tractor on a hill when it rolled over due to a defect in the tractor's design. He was injured as a result. The buyer sued the auctioneer, alleging strict liability in tort. The jurisdiction has not adopted a comparative fault rule in strict liability cases. In this suit, the result should be for the\nA. plaintiff, because the defendant sold a defective product that injured the plaintiff.\nB. plaintiff, because the defendant failed to inspect the tractor for defects prior to sale.\nC. defendant, because he should not be considered a \"seller\" for purposes of strict liability in tort.\nD. defendant, because the accident was caused in part by the buyer's negligence.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:03.327943+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 147, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.294", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "C", "picked": null, "sampled": "A", "options": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:03.327972+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 148, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.168", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A customer went into a store at approximately 6:45 p. m. to look at some suits. The customer selected three suits from a rack and went into the dressing room to try them on. Signs posted on the walls of the store state that closing time is 9:00 p. m. ; however, because of a special awards banquet for employees, the store was closed at 7:00 p. m. on this day. When the customer emerged from the dressing room a few minutes after 7:00 p. m. , he was alone and locked in. The customer tried the front door but it was secured on the outside by a bar and padlock, so he went to the rear door. The customer grabbed the door knob and vigorously shook the door. The activity set off a mechanism that sprayed a chemical mist in the customer's face, causing him to become temporarily blind. If the customer is to prevail on a claim against the store based on battery from the use of the chemical spray, the customer must establish that\nA. he suffered severe bodily harm.\nB. the spray mist was an offensive or harmful contact.\nC. he suffered severe emotional distress.\nD. his conduct was not a factual cause of the chemical's spraying him.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:03.334661+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 149, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.168", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "B", "picked": "B", "sampled": "B", "options": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:03.334689+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 150, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.225", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A man was driving north on an interstate highway at about 50 miles per hour when a tractor-trailer rig, owned and driven by a driver, passed him. The tractor was pulling a refrigerated meat trailer fully loaded with beef carcasses hanging freely from the trailer ceiling. When the driver cut back in front of the man, the shifting weight of the beef caused the trailer to overturn. The man was unable to avoid a collision with the overturned trailer and was injured. The trailer had been manufactured by a trailer company. A number of truckers had complained to the trailer company that the design of the trailer, which allowed the load to swing freely, was dangerous. The driver knew of the dangerous propensity of the trailer. A restraining device that could be installed in the trailer would prevent the load from shifting and was available at nominal cost. The driver knew of the restraining device but had not installed it. If the man asserts a claim based on strict liability against the trailer company, he will\nA. not recover, because the man was driving negligently when the trailer overturned.\nB. recover, because the driver's knowledge of the dangerous propensity of the trailer does not relieve the trailer company of liability.\nC. not recover, because there was no privity of contract between the man and the trailer company.\nD. not recover, because the driver was negligent in failing to install the restraining device in the trailer.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:03.359617+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 151, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.225", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "B", "picked": "B", "sampled": "B", "options": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:03.359646+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 152, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.141", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "In 2006, a utility company constructed a new plant for the generation of electricity. The plant burns lignite, a low-grade fuel which is available in large quantities. Although the plant was constructed in accordance with the best practicable technology, the plant emits a substantial quantity of invisible fumes. The only way the utility company can reduce the fumes is by the use of scrubbing equipment that would cost $50,000,000 to install and would increase the retail price of generated electricity by 50 percent while reducing the volume of fumes by only 20 percent. Because of the expense of such equipment and its relative ineffectiveness, no other generating plants burning lignite use such equipment. The plant was located in a sparsely settled rural area, remote from the large city served by the utility company. A farmer owned a farm adjacent to the plant. He had farmed the land for 40 years and lived on the premises. The prevailing winds carried fumes from the new plant over the farmer's land. His 2006 crop was less than half the average size of this crop over the five years immediately preceding the construction of the plant. It can be established that the fumes caused the crop reduction. The farmer's hay fever, from which he had long suffered, became worse in 2006. Physicians advised him that the lignite fumes were affecting it and that serious lung disease would soon result unless he moved away from the plant. He did so, selling his farm at its reasonable market value, which was then $10,000 less than before the construction of the plant. If the farmer asserts a claim based on nuisance against the utility company for damages for personal injuries, will the farmer prevail?\nA. No, because there is no practicable way for the utility company to reduce the fumes.\nB. No, because the utility company's acts constituted a public nuisance.\nC. Yes, because the farmer's personal injuries were within the scope of the liability imposed on the utility company.\nD. Yes, because the generation of electricity is an ultra-hazardous activity.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:03.404553+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 153, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.141", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "C", "picked": "C", "sampled": "C", "options": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:03.404583+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 154, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.53", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A motorist arranged to borrow his friend's car to drive for one day while the motorist's car was being repaired. The friend knew that the brakes on his car were faulty and might fail in an emergency. The friend forgot to tell the motorist about the brakes when the motorist picked up the car, but the friend did telephone the motorist's wife and told her about them. The wife, however, forgot to tell the motorist. The motorist was driving the friend's car at a reasonable rate of speed and within the posted speed limit with the motorist's wife as a passenger. Another car, driven by a woman, crossed in front of the motorist at an intersection and in violation of the traffic signal. The motorist tried to stop, but the brakes failed, and the two cars collided. If the brakes had been in proper working order, the motorist could have stopped in time to avoid the collision. The motorist and his wife were injured. If the jurisdiction has adopted \"pure\" comparative negligence and the motorist's wife asserts a claim against the woman, the wife will\nA. recover in full for her injuries, because the motorist, who was driving the car in which she was riding, was not himself at fault.\nB. recover a proportion of her damages based on the respective degrees of her negligence and that of the woman.\nC. not recover, because but for the failure of the brakes the collision would not have occurred.\nD. not recover, because she was negligent and her negligence continued until the moment of impact.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["A."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:03.445149+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 155, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.53", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "B", "picked": null, "sampled": "A.", "options": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:03.445179+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 156, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.271", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A defendant built in his backyard a garage that encroached two feet across the property line onto property owned by his neighbor. Thereafter, the defendant sold his property to a friend. The neighbor was unaware, prior to the defendant's sale to his friend, of the encroachment of the garage onto her property. When the neighbor subsequently learned of the encroachment, she sued the defendant for damages for trespass. In this action, will the neighbor prevail?\nA. No, because the defendant was unaware of the encroachment when the garage was built.\nB. No, because the defendant no longer owns or possesses the garage.\nC. Yes, because the defendant knew where the garage was located, whether or not he knew where the property line was.\nD. Yes, because the friend was unaware of the encroachment when he purchased the property.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:03.479082+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 157, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.271", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "C", "picked": "C", "sampled": "C", "options": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:03.479112+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 158, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.221", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A security guard, dressed in plain clothes, was working for a discount store when a customer got into a heated argument with a cashier over the store's refund policy. Without identifying himself as a security guard, the security guard suddenly grabbed the customer's arm. The customer attempted to push the security guard away, and the security guard knocked the customer to the floor, causing injuries. The customer sued the discount store for battery on a theory of vicarious liability for the injuries caused by the security guard. The store filed an answer to the customer's complaint, asserting the affirmative defense of contributory negligence. The customer has moved to strike the affirmative defense. Traditional rules of contributory negligence apply. Should the trial court grant the customer's motion?\nA. No, because contributory negligence is an affirmative defense to a cause of action based on vicarious liability.\nB. No, because the customer should have known that his argument with the cashier might provoke an action by a security guard.\nC. Yes, because contributory negligence is not a defense to battery.\nD. Yes, because the customer did not know that he was pushing away someone who was employed as a security guard.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:03.558271+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 159, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.221", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "C", "picked": null, "sampled": "A", "options": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:03.558303+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 160, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.58", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A customer pledged a stock certificate to a bank as security for a loan. A year later, when the customer fully repaid the loan, the bank refused the customer's demand to return the stock certificate because the officer dealing with the loan had the mistaken belief that there was still a balance due. No one at the bank reviewed the records until two months later, at which time the error was discovered. The bank then offered to return the stock certificate. However, the customer refused to accept it. At the time the customer pledged the certificate, the shares were worth $10,000; at the time the customer repaid the loan, the shares were worth $20,000; and at the time the bank offered to return the certificate, the shares were worth $5,000. If the customer brings an action against the bank based on conversion, how much, if anything, should the customer recover?\nA. Nothing, because the bank lawfully came into possession of the certificate.\nB. $5,000, because that was the value of the shares when the customer refused to accept the certificate back.\nC. $10,000, because that was the value of the shares when the bank came into possession of the certificate.\nD. $20,000, because that was the value of the shares when the customer was entitled to the return of the certificate.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:03.688936+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 161, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.58", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "D", "picked": "D", "sampled": "D", "options": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:03.688984+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 162, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.46", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A homeowner resides downhill from a metal fabrication facility. She has sued both the owner of the facility and the supplier of a solvent used at the facility. She contends that contaminants, consisting mostly of the solvent, were released into the ground at the facility and have migrated and continue to migrate to her property, contaminating the soil, the groundwater, and her well. She alleges various acts of negligence on the part of the facility owner in causing the release of the contaminants into the ground. She also alleges that employees of the solvent supplier were negligent in frequently spilling some of the solvent onto the ground while filling a rooftop tank at the facility. The solvent supplier has moved for summary judgment, arguing that if there was any contamination, the facility owner and the supplier independently contributed indeterminate amounts to the contamination and that therefore the homeowner cannot show how much damage each has inflicted on her. There is no evidence that the facility owner and the solvent supplier acted in concert. Should the court grant the summary judgment motion?\nA. No, because concurrent tortfeasors are jointly and severally liable for an indivisible injury.\nB. No, because the solvent supplier is vicariously liable for damage inflicted by the facility owner.\nC. Yes, because there is no basis for allocating damages against the solvent supplier.\nD. Yes, because there is no evidence that the facility owner and the solvent supplier acted in concert.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:03.780968+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 163, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.46", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "A", "picked": null, "sampled": "D", "options": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:03.781003+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 164, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.176", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A customer ordered some merchandise from a store. When the merchandise was delivered, the customer decided that it was not what he had ordered, and he returned it for credit. The store refused to credit the customer's account, continued to bill him, and, after 90 days, turned the account over to a bill collector for collection. The bill collector showed up at the customer's house at 7 p. m. on a summer evening while many of the customer's neighbors were seated on their porches. When the customer opened the door, the bill collector, who was standing just outside the door, raised an electrically amplified bullhorn to his mouth. In a voice that could be heard a block away, the bill collector called the customer a \"deadbeat\" and asked him when he intended to pay his bill to the store. The customer, greatly angered, slammed the door shut. The door struck the bullhorn and jammed it forcibly against the bill collector's face. As a consequence, the bill collector lost some of his front teeth. If the customer asserts a claim based on defamation against the bill collector, will the customer prevail?\nA. Yes, because the bill collector's remarks were heard by the customer's neighbors.\nB. Yes, because the bill collector's conduct was extreme and outrageous.\nC. No, because the bill collector did not know that the customer owed no money to the store.\nD. No, because the customer did not suffer any special damages.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:04.001727+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 165, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.176", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "D", "picked": "D", "sampled": "D", "options": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:04.001771+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 166, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.197", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A man, who was driving his car at night, stopped the car and went into a nearby tavern for a drink. He left the car standing at the side of the road, projecting three feet into the traffic lane. The lights were on and his friend, the plaintiff, was asleep in the back seat. The plaintiff awoke, discovered the situation, and went back to sleep. Before the man returned, his car was hit by an automobile approaching from the rear and driven by the defendant. The plaintiff was injured. The plaintiff sued the defendant and the man jointly to recover the damages he suffered resulting from the accident. The jurisdiction has a pure comparative negligence rule and has abolished the defense of assumption of risk. In respect to other issues, the rules of the common law remain in effect. The plaintiff should recover\nA. nothing, because the plaintiff was more negligent than either the defendant or the man.\nB. nothing, because the total of the defendant's and the man's negligence was not greater than the plaintiff's.\nC. from the defendant and the man, jointly and severally, the amount of damages the plaintiff suffered reduced by the percentage of the total negligence that is attributed to the plaintiff.\nD. from the defendant and the man, severally, a percentage of the plaintiff's damages equal to the percentage of fault attributed to each of the defendants.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:04.059320+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 167, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.197", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "C", "picked": null, "sampled": "D", "options": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:04.059353+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 168, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.213", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A restaurant building was expanded into a vacant lot north of its original location. The contractor who was working on the restaurant expansion found that the north wall of the new structure needed extensive support, so anchor rods and concrete were added. The supporting anchor rods and concrete extended into a neighboring property farther to the north at a point 20 feet below the surface. Although there was no impact on the surface of his land or on existing uses, the owner of the neighboring property has sued the restaurant owner for trespass. Which party is likely to prevail?\nA. The neighboring property owner, because he should have been given notice of the intrusion before it occurred.\nB. The neighboring property owner, because the restaurant intruded upon his property without permission.\nC. The restaurant owner, because the decision to provide the additional support was reasonable.\nD. The restaurant owner, because there was no disturbance of peaceful enjoyment of the neighboring property.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:04.090395+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 169, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.213", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "B", "picked": "B", "sampled": "B", "options": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:04.090427+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 170, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.196", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A car owner washed her car while it was parked on a public street, in violation of a local ordinance that prohibits the washing of vehicles on public streets during specified hours. The ordinance was enacted only to expedite the flow of automobile traffic. Due to sudden and unexpected cold weather, the car owner's waste water formed a puddle that froze in a crosswalk. A pedestrian slipped on the frozen puddle and broke her leg. The pedestrian sued the car owner to recover for her injury. At trial, the only evidence the pedestrian offered as to negligence was the car owner's admission that she had violated the ordinance. At the conclusion of the evidence, both parties moved for a directed verdict. How should the trial judge proceed?\nA. Deny both motions and submit the case to the jury, because, on the facts, the jury may infer that the car owner was negligent.\nB. Deny both motions and submit the case to the jury, because the jury may consider the ordinance violation as evidence that the car owner was negligent.\nC. Grant the car owner's motion, because the pedestrian has failed to offer adequate evidence that the car owner was negligent.\nD. Grant the pedestrian's motion, because of the car owner's admitted ordinance violation.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:04.107789+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 171, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.196", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "C", "picked": "C", "sampled": "C", "options": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:04.107820+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 172, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.260", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A homeowner owns a house in a city. On the lawn in front of his home and within five feet of the public sidewalk there was a large tree. The roots of the tree caused the sidewalk to buckle severely and become dangerous. An ordinance of the city requires adjacent landowners to keep sidewalks in a safe condition. The homeowner engaged a contractor to repair the sidewalk, leaving it to the contractor to decide how the repair should be made. The contractor dug up the sidewalk, cut back the roots of the tree, and laid a new sidewalk. Two days after the homeowner had paid the contractor the agreed price of the repair, the tree fell over onto the street and damaged a parked car belonging to a driver. The driver has asserted claims against the homeowner and the contractor, and both defendants admit that cutting the roots caused the tree to fall. If the driver recovers a judgment against the homeowner due to the homeowner's vicarious liability, does the homeowner have any recourse against the contractor?\nA. No, because payment by the homeowner was an acceptance of the work.\nB. No, because the homeowner selected the contractor to do the work.\nC. Yes, because the judgment against the homeowner was based on vicarious liability.\nD. Yes, because the homeowner's conduct was not a factual cause of the harm.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:04.193075+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 173, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.260", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "C", "picked": "C", "sampled": "C", "options": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:04.193107+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 174, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.302", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A doctor resided in her own home. The street in front of the home had a gradual slope. The doctor's garage was on the street level, with a driveway entrance from the street. At two in the morning, the doctor received an emergency call. She dressed and went to the garage to get her car and found a car parked in front of her driveway. That car was occupied by a man, who, while intoxicated, had driven to that place and now was in a drunken stupor in the front seat. Unable to rouse the man, the doctor pushed him into the passenger's side of the front seat and got in on the driver's side. The doctor released the brake and coasted the car down the street, planning to pull into a parking space that was open. When the doctor attempted to stop the car, the brakes failed to work, and the car crashed into the wall of a homeowner's home, damaging the home and the man's car and injuring the doctor and the man. Subsequent examination of the car disclosed that the brake linings were badly worn. A state statute prohibits the operation of a motor vehicle unless the brakes are capable of stopping the vehicle within specified distances at specified speeds. The brakes on the man's car were incapable of stopping the vehicle within the limits required by the statute. Another state statute makes it a criminal offense to be intoxicated while driving a motor vehicle. If the man asserts a claim against the doctor for his injuries, the man will probably\nA. recover, because the doctor was negligent as a matter of law.\nB. recover, because the doctor had no right to move the car.\nC. not recover, because his brakes were defective.\nD. not recover, because he was in a drunken stupor when injured.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:04.196678+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 175, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.302", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "C", "picked": null, "sampled": "D", "options": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:04.196709+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 176, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.297", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A dairy farmer bought a milking system for his cows from an independent distributor. The farmer did not communicate with the manufacturer of the milking system or any of its agents before purchasing the system. The distributor knew that the farmer had several lucrative contracts with milk wholesalers, but the manufacturer was unaware of these contracts. The system never operated properly because of a manufacturing defect, and as a result the dairy farmer lost much of the wholesale contract revenue. Does the farmer have a viable strict products liability claim against the manufacturer for recovery of his lost revenue?\nA. No, because of the economic loss doctrine.\nB. No, because the manufacturer was not aware of the farmer's wholesale contracts.\nC. Yes, because the consequential damages rule of contract law does not apply in a products liability action in which the product was in fact defective.\nD. Yes, because the milking system's defect proximately caused the farmer's loss of revenue.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:04.307636+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 177, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.297", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "A", "picked": "A", "sampled": "A", "options": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:04.307674+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 178, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.226", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "An eight-year-old child went to the grocery store with her mother. The child pushed the grocery cart while her mother put items into it. The child's mother remained near the child at all times. Another customer in the store noticed the child pushing the cart in a manner that caused the customer no concern. A short time later, the cart the child was pushing struck the customer in the knee, inflicting serious injury. If the customer brings an action, based on negligence, against the child, the child's best argument in defense would be that\nA. The child exercised care commensurate with her age, intelligence, and experience.\nB. The child is not subject to tort liability.\nC. The child was subject to parental supervision.\nD. The customer assumed the risk that the child might hit the customer with the cart.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:04.377088+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 179, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.226", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "A", "picked": null, "sampled": "B", "options": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:04.377123+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 180, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.326", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "While walking on a public sidewalk, a pedestrian was struck by a piece of lumber that fell from the roof of a homeowner's house. The homeowner had hired a repairman to make repairs to his roof, and the lumber fell through due to negligence on the repairman's part. Assume that the homeowner exercised reasonable care in hiring the repairman, that the repairman was an independent contractor, and that public policy made a homeowner's duty to keep the sidewalk safe for pedestrian a nondelegable duty. If the pedestrian brings an action against the homeowner to recover damages for the injury caused to him by the repairman's negligence, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, under the res ipsa loquitur doctrine.\nB. Yes, because the repairman's act was a breach of a nondelegable duty owed by the homeowner to the pedestrian.\nC. No, because the repairman was an independent contractor rather than the homeowner's servant.\nD. No, because the homeowner exercised reasonable care in hiring the repairman to do the repair.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:04.451021+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 181, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.326", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "B", "picked": "B", "sampled": "B", "options": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:04.451068+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 182, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.179", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "In a civil action, a plaintiff sued a decedent's estate to recover damages for injuries she suffered in a collision between her car and one driven by the decedent. At trial, the plaintiff introduced undisputed evidence that the decedent's car had swerved across the centerline of the highway into oncoming traffic, where it had collided with the plaintiff's car. The decedent's estate introduced undisputed evidence that, before he swerved across the centerline, the decedent had suffered a fatal heart attack, which he had no reason to foresee, and that, just prior to the heart attack, the decedent had been driving at a reasonable speed and in a reasonable manner. A statute makes it a traffic offense to cross the centerline of a highway. In this case, which party is likely to prevail?\nA. The decedent's estate, because its rebuttal evidence is undisputed.\nB. The decedent's estate, because the plaintiff has not established a prima facie case of liability.\nC. The plaintiff, because the accident was of a type that does not ordinarily happen in the absence of negligence on the actor's part.\nD. The plaintiff, because the decedent crossed the centerline in violation of the statute.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:04.542953+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 183, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.179", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "A", "picked": "A", "sampled": "A", "options": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:04.542986+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 184, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.295", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "In 1970, a cattle company bought a 150-acre tract of agricultural land well suited for a cattle feedlot. The tract was 10 miles from the city and five miles from the nearest home. By 2006, the city limits extended to the cattle company's feedlot. About 10,000 people lived within three miles of the cattle-feeding operation. The cattle company land is outside the city limits and no zoning ordinance applies. The cattle company uses the best and most sanitary feed lot procedures, including chemical sprays, to keep down flies and odors and frequently removes manure. Despite these measures, residents of the city complain of flies and odors. An action has been filed by five individual homeowners who live within half a mile of the cattle company feedlot. Flies in the area are five to 10 times more numerous than in other parts of the city, and extremely obnoxious odors are frequently carried by the wind to the plaintiffs' homes. The odors do not affect any other part of the city. The flies and odors are a substantial health hazard. If plaintiffs assert a claim based on public nuisance, plaintiffs will\nA. prevail, because plaintiffs sustained harm different from that suffered by the public at large.\nB. prevail, because the cattle company's acts interfered with a person's enjoyment of his property.\nC. not prevail, because only the state may bring an action based on public nuisance.\nD. not prevail, because plaintiffs came to the nuisance.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:04.659540+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 185, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.295", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "A", "picked": null, "sampled": "B", "options": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:04.659577+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 186, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.164", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A newspaper published an editorial in which an editor asserted that a candidate for high political office was a user of illegal drugs. The accusation was untrue. The editor acted unreasonably in not investigating the accusation before publishing it; however, the editor honestly believed that the accusation was true. The candidate sued the editor for defamation. &nbsp;Is the candidate entitled to recover?\nA. No, because the accusation appeared in an editorial and was, therefore, merely an opinion.\nB. No, because the editor honestly believed that the accusation was true.\nC. Yes, because calling someone an illegal drug user is defamatory per se.\nD. Yes, because the accusation was false and was injurious to the candidate's reputation.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:04.754660+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 187, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.164", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "B", "picked": null, "sampled": "D", "options": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:04.754780+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 188, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.202", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A water pipe burst in the basement of a grocery store, flooding the basement and damaging cases of canned goods on the floor. The plumbing contractor's workmen, in repairing the leak, knocked over several stacks of canned goods in cases, denting the cans. After settling its claims against the landlord for the water leak and against the plumbing contractor for the damage done by his workmen, the grocery store put the goods on special sale. Four weeks later, a customer was shopping in the grocery store. Several tables in the market were covered with assorted canned foods, all of which were dirty and dented. A sign on each of the tables read: \"Damaged Cans - Half Price. \"The customer was having a guest over for dinner that evening and purchased two dented cans of tuna, packed by a canning company, from one of the tables displaying the damaged cans. The customer returned home and inspected the tuna. Finding no defect with either can, the customer prepared a tuna casserole which she and the guest later ate. Both became ill, and the medical testimony established that the illness was caused by the tuna being unfit for consumption. The tuna consumed by the customer and the guest came from the case that was at the top of one of the stacks knocked over by the workmen. The tuna in undamaged cans from the same canning company's shipment was fit for consumption. If the guest asserts a claim against the customer, the customer most likely will\nA. be held strictly liable in tort for serving spoiled tuna.\nB. not be held liable because she was not negligent.\nC. not be held liable because she did not act with reckless disregard for the safety of the guest.\nD. not be held liable because the guest was a social visitor.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:04.807135+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 189, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.202", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "B", "picked": null, "sampled": "A", "options": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:04.807164+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 190, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.306", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "After a woman left a company to start her own business, her former supervisor became convinced that she was breaching a noncompetition agreement that she had signed when she had begun employment with the company. At the supervisor's suggestion, the company assigned its security officer to investigate and provided the officer with information about the woman, including her telephone number. Unbeknownst to the company, the officer emailed the woman's phone service provider, pretending to be the woman, and obtained copies of her phone records, which showed that she had contacted several customers of the company after she left, in breach of the agreement. The records also revealed a number of phone calls by the woman to others, including medical providers. The woman, after learning of the security officer's investigation, sued the company, asserting several tort claims. Should the trial court allow the case to go to the jury?\nA. No, because the company did not expressly authorize the security officer's acts.\nB. No, because the woman was in breach of her noncompetition agreement with the company.\nC. Yes, on a claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress.\nD. Yes, on a claim of invasion of privacy.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:04.852144+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 191, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.306", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "D", "picked": "D", "sampled": "D", "options": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:04.852174+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 192, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.124", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A gas company owns a storage facility where flammable gases are stored in liquified form under high pressure in large spherical tanks. The facility was designed by the gas company and constructed for the gas company by a construction company that specializes in the construction of such facilities. After the facility had been in use for five years, an explosion in the facility started a large fire that blanketed the surrounding countryside with a high concentration of oily smoke and soot. The explosion was caused by an obvious defect in the design of the storage facility. A farmer owns a large lettuce farm near the facility. His entire lettuce crop was destroyed by oil deposits left by the smoke. A neighbor, who lives near the facility, inhaled a large amount of the smoke and thereafter became obsessed by a fear that the inhalation would destroy his health and ultimately cause his death. If the farmer asserts a claim against the construction company for the loss of his lettuce crop, will the farmer prevail?\nA. No, because the construction company did not design the storage facility.\nB. No, because the construction company was an independent contractor.\nC. Yes, because the operation of the storage facility was an abnormally dangerous activity.\nD. Yes, because the explosion resulted from a defect of which the construction company should have been aware.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:04.974052+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 193, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.124", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "D", "picked": "D", "sampled": "D", "options": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:04.974099+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 194, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.28", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A professor, in a lecture in her psychology course at a private university, described an experiment in which a group of college students in a neighboring city rushed out and washed cars stopped at traffic lights during rush hour. She described how people reacted differently - with shock, joy, and surprise. At the conclusion of her report, she said, \"You understand, of course, that you are not to undertake this or any other experiment unless you first clear it with me. \" Four of the professor's students decided to try the same experiment but did not clear it with the professor. One subject of their experiment said, \"I was shocked. There were two people on each side of the car. At first I thought negatively. I thought they were going to attack me and thought of driving away. Then I quieted down and decided there were too many dirty cars in the city anyway. \"Charitable immunity has been abolished in the jurisdiction. If the subject has a valid claim against the students, will he also prevail against the university?\nA. Yes, because the students would not have performed the experiment but for the professor's lecture.\nB. Yes, because the subject's claim against the students is based on negligence.\nC. No, because the students were not the professor's employees.\nD. No, because the professor did not authorize the car wash as a class project.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:05.003472+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 195, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.28", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "D", "picked": "D", "sampled": "D", "options": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:05.003510+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 196, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.91", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "The governor of a state signed a death warrant for a convicted murderer. Two protesters are active opponents of the death penalty. At a demonstration protesting the execution of the murderer, the protesters carried large signs that state, \"The governor - Murderer. \" A television station broadcast news coverage of the demonstration, including pictures of the signs carried by the protesters. The governor asserted a defamation claim against the television station. Assume that the jury finds that although the signs caused the public to hold the governor in lower esteem, the only reasonable interpretation of the signs was that the term \"murderer\" was intended as a characterization of anyone who would sign a death warrant. Will the governor prevail?\nA. Yes, because the signs would cause persons to hold the governor in lower esteem.\nB. Yes, because the governor can prove that the television station showed the signs with knowledge of falsity or reckless disregard of the truth that the governor had not committed homicide.\nC. No, because the governor cannot prove he suffered pecuniary loss resulting from harm to his reputation proximately caused by the defendants' signs.\nD. No, because the only reasonable interpretation of the signs was that the term \"murderer\" was intended as a characterization of one who would sign a death warrant.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:05.208542+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 197, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.91", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "D", "picked": "D", "sampled": "D", "options": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:05.208606+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 198, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.190", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A pedestrian started north across the street in a clearly marked north-south crosswalk with the green traffic light in her favor. The pedestrian was in a hurry, and so before reaching the north curb on the street, she cut to her left diagonally across the street to the east-west crosswalk and started across it. Just after reaching the east-west crosswalk, the traffic light turned green in her favor. She proceeded about five steps further across the street to the west in the crosswalk when she was struck by a car approaching from her right that she thought would stop, but did not. The car was driven by a driver, 81 years of age, who failed to stop his car after seeing that the traffic light was red against him. The pedestrian had a bone disease, resulting in very brittle bones, that is prevalent in only 0. 02 percent of the population. As a result of the impact the pedestrian suffered a broken leg and the destruction of her family heirloom, a Picasso original painting that she was taking to her bank for safekeeping. The painting had been purchased by the pedestrian's grandmother for $750 but was valued at $500,000 at the time of the accident. The pedestrian has filed suit against the driver. The driver's attorney has alleged that the pedestrian violated a state statute requiring that pedestrians stay in crosswalks, and that if the pedestrian had not violated the statute she would have had to walk 25 feet more to reach the impact point and therefore would not have been at a place where she could have been hit by the driver. The pedestrian's attorney ascertains that there is a statute as alleged by the driver, that his measurements are correct, that there is a state statute requiring observance of traffic lights, and that the driver's license expired two years prior to the collision. The violation of the crosswalk statute by the pedestrian should not defeat her cause of action against the driver because\nA. the driver violated the traffic light statute at a later point in time than the pedestrian's violation.\nB. pedestrians are entitled to assume that automobile drivers will obey the law.\nC. the pedestrian was hit while in the crosswalk.\nD. the risks that the statute was designed to protect against probably did not include an earlier arrival at another point.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:05.292203+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 199, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.190", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "D", "picked": null, "sampled": "C", "options": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:05.292243+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 200, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.313", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A racetrack held a motorcycle race, which was sponsored by a local motorcycle dealership. Under the sponsorship agreement, the dealership was required to arrange for licensed and trained emergency medical technicians (EMTs) to be present during the race. The dealership contracted with a licensed and reputable emergency medical services (EMS) firm that supplied EMTs for events such as these. A motorcyclist participating in the race was injured when he lost control of his motorcycle. The motorcyclist was treated at the scene by the EMTs. In removing the motorcyclist's helmet, one of the EMTs twisted the motorcyclist's neck, causing him to become permanently paralyzed. The motorcyclist has sued both the EMS firm and the dealership, alleging that the EMT's careless conduct caused his paralysis. Assuming the validity of the motorcyclist's negligence claim against the EMS firm, which of the following best characterizes the dealership's potential liability?\nA. The dealership is directly liable for hiring the EMS firm.\nB. The dealership is vicariously liable, because it owed a nondelegable duty to provide emergency care for the race.\nC. The dealership is vicariously liable, because the EMT was careless in the course of her employment.\nD. The dealership is neither directly liable nor vicariously liable.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:05.383871+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 201, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.313", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "D", "picked": null, "sampled": "B", "options": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:05.383960+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 202, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.231", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A homeowner owns a house on a lake. A neighbor owns a house across a driveway from the homeowner's property. The neighbor's house sits on a hill and the neighbor can see the lake from his living room window. The homeowner and the neighbor got into an argument and the homeowner erected a large spotlight on his property that automatically comes on at dusk and goes off at sunrise. The only reason the homeowner installed the light was to annoy the neighbor. The glare from the light severely detracts from the neighbor's view of the lake. In a suit by the neighbor against the homeowner, will the neighbor prevail?\nA. Yes, because the homeowner installed the light solely to annoy the neighbor.\nB. Yes, but only because the neighbor's property value was adversely affected.\nC. No, because the neighbor's view of the lake is not always obstructed.\nD. No, because the spotlight provides added security to the homeowner's property.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:05.483569+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 203, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.231", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "A", "picked": "A", "sampled": "A", "options": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:05.483625+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 204, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.286", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A recently established law school constructed its building in a quiet residential neighborhood. The law school had obtained all the necessary municipal permits for the construction of the building, which included a large clock tower whose clock chimed every hour. The chimes disturbed only one homeowner in the neighborhood, who had purchased her house prior to the construction of the building. The homeowner was abnormally sensitive to ringing sounds, such as bells and sirens, and found the chimes to be extremely annoying. In a nuisance action by the homeowner against the law school, will the homeowner be likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the chimes interfere with the homeowner's use and enjoyment of her property.\nB. Yes, because the homeowner purchased her house prior to the construction of the building.\nC. No, because the chimes do not disturb the other residents of the neighborhood.\nD. No, because the law school had obtained the requisite municipal permits to erect the clock tower.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:05.541420+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 205, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.286", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "C", "picked": null, "sampled": "A", "options": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:05.541461+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 206, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.93", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "While an equestrian was riding her horse on what she thought was a public path, the owner of a house next to the path approached her, shaking a stick and shouting, \"Get off my property. \" Unknown to the equestrian, the path on which she was riding crossed the private property of the shouting owner. When the equestrian explained that she thought the path was a public trail, the man cursed her, approached the equestrian's horse, and struck the horse with the stick. As a result of the blow, the horse reared, causing the equestrian to fear that she would fall. However, the equestrian managed to stay on her horse, and then departed. Neither the equestrian nor the horse suffered bodily harm. If the equestrian brings an action for damages against the property owner, the result should be for\nA. the equestrian, for trespass to her chattel property.\nB. the equestrian, for battery and assault.\nC. the defendant, because the equestrian suffered no physical harm.\nD. the defendant, because he was privileged to exclude trespassers from his property.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:05.563399+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 207, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.93", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "B", "picked": "B", "sampled": "B", "options": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:05.563440+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 208, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.63", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "The day after a seller completed the sale of his house and moved out, one of the slates flew off the roof during a windstorm. The slate struck a pedestrian who was on the public sidewalk. The pedestrian was seriously injured. The roof is old and has lost several slates in ordinary windstorms on other occasions when the seller was present. The pedestrian was also aware that past windstorms had blown slates off the roof. If the pedestrian sues the seller to recover damages for his injuries, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the roof was defective when the seller sold the house.\nB. Yes, because the seller should have been aware of the condition of the roof and should have realized that it was dangerous to persons outside the premises.\nC. No, because the seller was neither the owner nor the occupier of the house when the pedestrian was injured.\nD. No, because the pedestrian knew that in the past slates had blown off the roof during windstorms.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:05.589408+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 209, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.63", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "B", "picked": null, "sampled": "C", "options": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:05.589460+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 210, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.73", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A pedestrian was crossing a street in a crosswalk when a woman walking just ahead of him was hit by a truck. The pedestrian, who had jumped out of the way of the truck, administered CPR to the woman, who was a stranger. The woman bled profusely, and the pedestrian was covered in blood. The woman died in the ambulance on the way to the hospital. The pedestrian became very depressed immediately after the incident and developed physical symptoms as a result of his emotional distress. The pedestrian has brought an action against the driver of the truck for negligent infliction of emotional distress. In her defense, the driver asserts that she should not be held liable, because the pedestrian's emotional distress and resulting physical symptoms are not compensable. What is the strongest argument that the pedestrian can make in response to the driver's defense?\nA. The pedestrian saw the driver hit the woman.\nB. The pedestrian was acting as a Good Samaritan.\nC. The pedestrian was covered in the woman's blood and developed physical symptoms as a result of his emotional distress.\nD. The pedestrian was in the zone of danger.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:05.649064+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 211, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.73", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "D", "picked": "D", "sampled": "D", "options": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:05.649115+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 212, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.61", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A 15-year-old boy was killed during a gang fight. Two days after his funeral, the boy's mother saw a television program about gang violence and was shocked to see video of herself weeping over the boy's body. The video had been shot by the television reporting team while the boy's body was still lying on a public street. The mother suffered severe emotional distress as a result of seeing the video. If the mother sues the television station for invasion of her privacy and that of her son, will the mother be likely to prevail?\nA. No, because a person has no right to privacy after his or her death.\nB. No, because the street was open to the public and the subject was newsworthy.\nC. Yes, because the mother did not give permission to have the video used in the program.\nD. Yes, because the mother suffered severe emotional distress as a result of viewing the video.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:05.676180+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 213, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.61", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "B", "picked": null, "sampled": "C", "options": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:05.676219+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 214, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.100", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A man was in the act of siphoning gasoline from a neighbor's car in the neighbor's garage and without his consent when the gasoline exploded and caused a fire. A rescuer, seeing the fire, grabbed a fire extinguisher from his car and put out the fire, saving the man's life and the neighbor's car and garage. In doing so, the rescuer was badly burned. If the rescuer asserts a claim against the man for personal injuries, the rescuer will\nA. prevail, because he saved the man's life.\nB. prevail, because the man was at fault in causing the fire.\nC. not prevail, because the rescuer knowingly assumed the risk.\nD. not prevail, because the rescuer's action was not a foreseeable consequence of the man's conduct.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:05.768724+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 215, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.100", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "B", "picked": null, "sampled": "D", "options": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:05.768769+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 216, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.112", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "Two lawyers work as partners in a small town that has only one other lawyer in it. The partners do a substantial amount of personal injury work. A client was severely and permanently injured in an automobile collision. The client employed the partners to represent her in obtaining damages from the motorist for her injuries. At the time she employed the partners, the statute of limitations on her claim had six weeks to run. The complaint was prepared but not filed. Each partner thought the other partner would file the complaint. The statute of limitations ran on the client's claim against the motorist. The client has filed suit against the partners for negligence. That case is on trial with a jury in a court of general jurisdiction. In order to establish a breach of the standard of care owed to her by the partners, the client\nA. must have a legal expert from the same locality testify that defendants' conduct was a breach.\nB. must have a legal expert from the same state testify that defendants' conduct was a breach.\nC. can rely on the application of the jurors' common knowledge as to whether there was a breach.\nD. can rely on the judge, as an expert in the law, to advise the jury whether there was a breach.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:06.055543+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 217, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.112", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "C", "picked": "C", "sampled": "C", "options": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:06.055575+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 218, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.311", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "An associate professor in the pediatrics department of a local medical school was denied tenure. He asked a national education lobbying organization to represent him in his efforts to have the tenure decision reversed. In response to a letter from the organization on the professor's behalf, the dean of the medical school wrote to the organization explaining truthfully that the professor had been denied tenure because of reports that he had abused two of his former patients. Several months later, after a thorough investigation, the allegations were proven false, and the professor was granted tenure. He had remained working at the medical school at full pay during the tenure decision review process and thus suffered no pecuniary harm. In a suit for libel by the professor against the dean of the medical school, will the professor be likely to prevail?\nA. No, because the professor invited the libel.\nB. No, because the professor suffered no pecuniary loss.\nC. Yes, because the dean had a duty to investigate the rumor before repeating it.\nD. Yes, because the dean's defamatory statement was in the form of a writing.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:06.123031+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 219, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.311", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "A", "picked": null, "sampled": "D", "options": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:06.123074+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 220, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.336", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A man was driving north on an interstate highway at about 50 miles per hour when a tractor-trailer rig, owned and driven by a driver, passed him. The tractor was pulling a refrigerated meat trailer fully loaded with beef carcasses hanging freely from the trailer ceiling. When the driver cut back in front of the man, the shifting weight of the beef caused the trailer to overturn. The man was unable to avoid a collision with the overturned trailer and was injured. The trailer had been manufactured by a trailer company. A number of truckers had complained to the trailer company that the design of the trailer, which allowed the load to swing freely, was dangerous. The driver knew of the dangerous propensity of the trailer. A restraining device that could be installed in the trailer would prevent the load from shifting and was available at nominal cost. The restraining device would have prevented the trailer from overturning. The driver knew of the restraining device but had not installed it. If the man asserts a claim for his injuries against the driver, he will\nA. prevail, because the use of a restraining device would have prevented the trailer from overturning.\nB. prevail, because the driver is strictly liable to the man for injuries resulting from defects in the trailer.\nC. not prevail because the driver was not driving in a negligent manner at the time the man was injured.\nD. not prevail, because the driver was not the manufacturer or seller of the trailer.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:06.198152+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 221, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.336", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "A", "picked": "A", "sampled": "A", "options": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:06.198192+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 222, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.17", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "The plaintiff is being treated by a physician for asbestosis, an abnormal chest condition that was caused by his on-the-job handling of materials containing asbestos. His physician has told him that the asbestosis is not presently cancerous, but that it considerably increases the risk that he will ultimately develop lung cancer. The plaintiff brought an action for damages, based on strict product liability, against the supplier of the materials that contained asbestos. The court in this jurisdiction has ruled against recovery of damages for negligently inflicted emotional distress in the absence of physical harm. If the supplier is subject to liability to the plaintiff for damages, should the award include damage for emotional distress he has suffered arising from his knowledge of the increased risk that he will develop lung cancer?\nA. No, because the plaintiff's emotional distress did not cause his physical condition.\nB. No, because the court does not recognize a cause of action for an increased risk of cancer.\nC. Yes, because the supplier of a dangerous product is strictly liable for the harm it causes.\nD. Yes, because the plaintiff's emotional distress arises from bodily harm caused by his exposure to asbestos.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:06.244009+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 223, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.17", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "D", "picked": "D", "sampled": "D", "options": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:06.244039+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 224, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.68", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A defendant left her car parked on the side of a hill. Two minutes later, the car rolled down the hill and struck and injured the plaintiff. In the plaintiff's negligence action against the defendant, the plaintiff introduced into evidence the facts stated above, which are undisputed. The defendant testified that, when she parked her car, she turned the front wheels into the curb and put on her emergency brakes, which were in good working order. She also introduced evidence that, in the weeks before this incident, juveniles had been tampering with cars in the neighborhood. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the defendant, and the plaintiff properly moved for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict. The plaintiff's motion should be\nA. granted, because it is more likely than not that the defendant's negligent conduct was the legal cause of the plaintiff's injuries.\nB. granted, because the evidence does not support the verdict.\nC. denied, because, given the defendant's evidence, the jury was not required to draw an inference of negligence from the circumstances of the accident.\nD. denied, because the defendant was in no better position than the plaintiff to explain the accident.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:06.290088+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 225, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.68", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "C", "picked": "C", "sampled": "C", "options": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:06.290119+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 226, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.43", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "In 2006, a utility company constructed a new plant for the generation of electricity. The plant burns lignite, a low-grade fuel which is available in large quantities. Although the plant was constructed in accordance with the best practicable technology, the plant emits a substantial quantity of invisible fumes. The only way the utility company can reduce the fumes is by the use of scrubbing equipment that would cost $50,000,000 to install and would increase the retail price of generated electricity by 50% while reducing the volume of fumes by only 20%. Because of the expense of such equipment and its relative ineffectiveness, no other generating plants burning lignite use such equipment. The plant was located in a sparsely settled rural area, remote from the large city served by the utility company. A farmer owned a farm adjacent to the plant. He had farmed the land for 40 years and lived on the premises. The prevailing winds carried fumes from the new plant over the farmer's land. His 2006 crop was less than half the average size of this crop over the five years immediately preceding the construction of the plant. It can be established that the fumes caused the crop reduction. The farmer's hay fever, from which he had long suffered, became worse in 2006. Physicians advised him that the lignite fumes were affecting it and that serious lung disease would soon result unless he moved away from the plant. He did so, selling his farm at its reasonable market value, which was then $10,000 less than before the construction of the plant. If the farmer asserts a claim based on negligence against the utility company for crop damages, will he prevail?\nA. No, because the utility company was not negligent.\nB. No, as to 2006 crop damage, because the farmer did not mitigate damages by selling his farm in 2005.\nC. Yes, as to 20% of his crop damage, because use of available equipment would have reduced the fumes by 20%.\nD. Yes, because operation of the plant constitutes a nuisance.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:06.298786+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 227, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.43", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "A", "picked": null, "sampled": "D", "options": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:06.298819+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 228, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.70", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A local telephone company negligently allowed one of its telephone poles, located between a street and a sidewalk, to become termite-ridden. A driver, who was intoxicated and driving at an excessive rate of speed, lost control of her car and hit the weakened telephone pole. One week later, the pole fell and struck a pedestrian who was walking on the sidewalk. The pole fell because of the combination of the force of the car's impact and the pole's termite-ridden condition. If the pedestrian asserts a claim against the telephone company and the driver, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, against the telephone company but not the driver.\nB. Yes, against the driver but not the telephone company.\nC. Yes, against the telephone company and the driver, each for one-half of his damages.\nD. Yes, against both the telephone company and the driver for the full amount of his damages.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:06.376038+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 229, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.70", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "D", "picked": null, "sampled": "A", "options": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:06.376072+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 230, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.241", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A plaintiff suffered a serious injury while participating in an impromptu basketball game at a public park. The injury occurred when the plaintiff and the defendant, on opposing teams, each tried to obtain possession of the ball when it rebounded from the backboard after a missed shot at the basket. During that encounter, the plaintiff was struck and injured by the defendant's elbow. The plaintiff now seeks compensation from the defendant. At the trial, evidence was introduced tending to prove that the game had been rough from the beginning, that elbows and knees had frequently been used to discourage interference by opposing players, and that the plaintiff had been one of those making liberal use of such tactics. In this action, will the plaintiff prevail?\nA. Yes, because the defendant intended to strike the plaintiff with his elbow.\nB. Yes, because the defendant intended to cause harmful or offensive contact with the plaintiff.\nC. No, because the plaintiff impliedly consented to violent play.\nD. No, because the defendant did not intentionally use force that exceeded the players' consent.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:06.412771+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 231, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.241", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "D", "picked": "D", "sampled": "D", "options": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:06.412807+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 232, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.76", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A trucker driving down an isolated country road late one night struck cattle that had escaped from a farmer's pen and wandered into the road. The trucker was unable to stop before hitting the cattle but was not driving carelessly. While he was not injured in the collision, the trucker sustained damage to his truck and lost income during the time it took to repair the truck. The trucker sued the farmer for his damages and invoked the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur. At trial, the farmer introduced evidence that his cattle pen was of a sufficient height to prevent cattle from stepping over it and was constructed of thick steel pipe sitting in concrete with a substantial top rail. A sturdy pen such as this one would be more difficult for cattle to break through than one constructed of barbed wire or electric wire. Should the trial court allow the case to go to the jury with a res ipsa loquitur instruction?\nA. No, because it is possible that a third party wrongfully let the cattle out of the pen.\nB. No, because the trucker must submit direct evidence of negligence in order to invoke the res ipsa loquitur doctrine.\nC. Yes, because the farmer is strictly liable for harm caused by his escaping cattle.\nD. Yes, because the jury could conclude that cattle would not ordinarily escape a strong, secure cattle pen in the absence of negligence.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:06.476194+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 233, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.76", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "D", "picked": "D", "sampled": "D", "options": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:06.476237+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 234, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.153", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "While attending an amusement park's fireworks display, a spectator was struck and injured by a rocket set off as part of the display. The rocket unexpectedly failed to shoot upward but instead followed a trajectory parallel to the ground and struck the spectator. The spectator has sued the amusement park for damages. On which of the following theories is the spectator most likely to be able to obtain a summary judgment as to liability?\nA. Abnormally dangerous activity.\nB. Battery.\nC. Nuisance.\nD. Strict products liability.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:06.521063+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 235, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.153", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "A", "picked": "A", "sampled": "A", "options": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:06.521135+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 236, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.316", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "When a mother visited a bowling alley to participate in the weekly bowling league competition held there, she brought her two-year-old son along and left him in a nursery provided by the bowling alley for the convenience of its customers. The children in the nursery were normally supervised by three attendants, but at this particular time, as the mother knew, there was only one attendant present to care for about 20 children of assorted ages. About 30 minutes later, while the attendant was looking the other way, the son suddenly started to cry. The attendant found him lying on his back, picked him up, and called his mother. It was later discovered that the son had suffered a skull fracture. If a claim is asserted against the bowling alley on the son's behalf, will the son prevail?\nA. Yes, because the bowling alley owed the child the highest degree of care.\nB. Yes, because a 2-year old is incapable of contributory negligence.\nC. No, because the bowling alley and its employees exercised reasonable care to assure the son's safety.\nD. No, because the mother assumed the risk by leaving her son in the nursery.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:06.790772+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 237, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.316", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "C", "picked": null, "sampled": "A", "options": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:06.826078+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 238, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.29", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A patient in a hospital was placed in a wheelchair with his broken leg extended straight out in front of him. As a nurse employed by the hospital was pushing the wheelchair through a set of automatic doors at a normal pace, the doors closed on the patient's foot, injuring it. The nurse attempted to pull the wheelchair back through the doors. This action caused the doors to close more tightly on the patient's foot, injuring it further. The patient sued the hospital, alleging improper maintenance of the doors. The patient has produced no evidence of specific conduct or neglect on the part of the hospital that would have caused the automatic doors to malfunction. The hospital has moved for summary judgment. Should the court grant the hospital's motion?\nA. No, because a jury could find that there was a latent defect in the doors.\nB. No, because a jury could find the hospital liable for negligence based on res ipsa loquitur.\nC. Yes, because proof of an accident, by itself, does not establish that an injured person was a victim of negligence.\nD. Yes, because the nurse's action was a superseding cause of the injury.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:06.892800+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 239, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.29", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "B", "picked": null, "sampled": "C", "options": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:06.892857+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 240, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.97", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A bright 12-year-old child attended a day-care center after school. The day-care center was located near a man-made duck pond on the property of a corporation. During the winter, the pond was used for ice-skating when conditions were suitable. At a time when the pond was obviously only partially frozen, the child sneaked away from the center's property and walked out onto the ice over the pond. The ice gave way, and the child fell into the cold water. He suffered shock and would have drowned had he not been rescued by a passerby. At the time of the incident, the pond was clearly marked with numerous signs that stated, \"THIN ICE—KEEP OFF. \" When the child sneaked away from the day-care center, the center was staffed with a reasonable number of qualified employees, and the employees were exercising reasonable care to ensure that the children in their charge did not leave the premises. There had not been a previous instance of a child coming onto the corporation's property from the day-care center. The jurisdiction follows a rule of pure comparative negligence. In a suit brought on the child's behalf against the corporation and based only on the facts above, who is likely to prevail?\nA. The child, because the corporation owes a duty to keep its premises free of dangerous conditions.\nB. The child, because the pond was an attractive nuisance.\nC. The corporation, because the danger of thin ice may reasonably be expected to be understood by a 12-year-old child.\nD. The corporation, because the day-care center had a duty to keep the child off the ice.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:06.923800+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 241, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.97", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "C", "picked": "C", "sampled": "C", "options": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:06.923857+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 242, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.307", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "The most generally accepted basis on which a court will hold that a person has a legal duty to aid another is the recognition by that person that there is immediate danger of serious harm to\nA. another human being from a stranger's wrongful conduct.\nB. his neighbor from a stranger's wrongful conduct.\nC. his cousin from a stranger's wrongful conduct.\nD. another human being from the person's own non-negligent conduct.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:06.980371+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 243, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.307", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "D", "picked": null, "sampled": "A", "options": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:06.980407+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 244, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.255", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A landowner who owned a large tract of land in the mountains sought to protect a herd of wild deer that lived on part of the land. Although the landowner had posted signs that said, \"No Hunting—No Trespassing,\" hunters frequently intruded to kill the deer. Recently, the landowner built an eight-foot-high chain-link fence, topped by three strands of barbed wire, across a gully on her land that provided the only access to the area where the deer lived. A wildlife photographer asked the landowner for permission to enter the land to photograph the deer. Because the landowner feared that any publicity would encourage further intrusions by hunters, she denied the photographer's request. Frustrated, the photographer attempted to climb the fence. He became entangled in the barbed wire and suffered extensive lacerations. The wounds became infected and ultimately caused his death. The photographer's personal representative has sued the landowner. Is the personal representative likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the landowner may not use deadly force to protect her land from intrusion.\nB. Yes, because the landowner had no property interest in the deer that entitled her to use force to protect them.\nC. No, because the photographer entered the landowner's land after the landowner had refused him permission to do so and therefore was a trespasser.\nD. No, because the potential for harm created by the presence of the barbed wire was apparent.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:07.030993+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 245, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.255", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "D", "picked": "D", "sampled": "D", "options": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:07.031030+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 246, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.24", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A doctor ordered chest X-rays for a patient who smoked cigarettes. After the consulting radiologist told the doctor that the X-rays looked normal, the doctor told the patient that he was in good health. In fact, the radiologist had missed signs of cancer on the X-rays that a trained radiologist, acting competently, would have detected. After another X-ray of the patient's chest, performed one year later, showed advanced lung cancer, the doctor discovered that the radiologist had misinterpreted the patient's earlier X-rays. The patient died within four months of the later X-ray, because by then his cancer had become untreatable. In a wrongful death suit against the radiologist based on only the facts set out above, a jury found the radiologist negligent and awarded $3 million in compensatory damages and $21 million in punitive damages. Is the radiologist likely to have the punitive damages award vacated on appeal?\nA. No, because a 7 to 1 ratio of punitive to compensatory damages is constitutionally permissible.\nB. No, because an award of punitive damages is appropriate for medical malpractice that results in death or serious injury.\nC. Yes, because punitive damages awards are not authorized unless there is proof of willful or wanton misconduct on the defendant's part.\nD. Yes, because the patient smoked cigarettes and therefore was contributorily negligent.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:07.067745+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 247, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.24", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "C", "picked": "C", "sampled": "C", "options": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:07.067794+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 248, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.114", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A homeowner was using a six-foot stepladder to clean the furnace in his home. The homeowner broke his arm when he slipped and fell from the ladder. The furnace had no warnings or instructions on how it was to be cleaned. In a suit by the homeowner against the manufacturer of the furnace to recover for his injury, is the homeowner likely to prevail?\nA. No, because the danger of falling from a ladder is obvious.\nB. No, because the homeowner should have hired a professional to clean the furnace.\nC. Yes, because the furnace did not have a ladder attached to it for cleaning purposes.\nD. Yes, because the lack of warnings or instructions for how to clean the furnace made the furnace defective.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:07.126043+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 249, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.114", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "A", "picked": null, "sampled": "D", "options": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:07.126113+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 250, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.216", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A large company owns and operates a beachfront hotel. Under a contract with the city to restore a public beach, a dredging company placed a large and unavoidably dangerous stone-crushing machine on the city land near the company's hotel. The machine creates a continuous and intense noise that is so disturbing to the hotel guests that they have canceled their hotel reservations in large numbers, resulting in a substantial loss to the company. The company's best chance to recover damages for its financial losses from the dredging company is under the theory that the operation of the stone-crushing machine constitutes\nA. an abnormally dangerous activity.\nB. a private nuisance.\nC. negligence.\nD. a trespass.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:07.162961+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 251, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.216", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "B", "picked": "B", "sampled": "B", "options": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:07.162999+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 252, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.321", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "The plaintiffs, a retired couple, had lived in their home in a residential neighborhood for 20 years when the defendants, a family of six, moved into the house next door and built a swimming pool in the back yard. The family's four young children frequently played in the pool after school. They often were joined by other neighborhood children. The plaintiffs were in the habit of reading and listening to classical music in the afternoons. Sometimes they took naps. The boisterous sounds of the children playing in the pool disturbed the plaintiffs' customary enjoyment of quiet afternoons. In the plaintiffs' nuisance action for damages against the defendants, the plaintiffs should\nA. prevail, because the children's noise constituted a substantial interference with the plaintiffs' use and enjoyment of their home.\nB. prevail, because the the plaintiffs' interest in the quiet enjoyment of their home takes precedence in time over the defendants' interests.\nC. not prevail, because the noise did not constitute a substantial and unreasonable disturbance to persons of normal sensibilities.\nD. not prevail, because the children's interest in healthy play has priority over the plaintiffs' interest in peace and quiet.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:07.202631+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 253, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.321", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "C", "picked": "C", "sampled": "C", "options": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:07.202668+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 254, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.51", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A company designed and built a processing plant for the manufacture of an explosive chemical. An engineer was retained by the company to design a filter system for the processing plant. She prepared an application for a permit to build the plant's filter system and submitted it to the state's Department of Environmental Protection (DEP). As required by DEP regulations, the engineer submitted a blueprint to the DEP with the application for permit. The blueprint showed the entire facility and was signed and sealed by her as a licensed professional engineer. After the project was completed, a portion of the processing plant exploded, injuring the plaintiff. During discovery in an action by the plaintiff against the engineer, it was established that the explosion was caused by a design defect that was unrelated to the filter system designed by the engineer. However, the defect was present in the blueprint signed by the engineer. In that action, will the plaintiff prevail?\nA. Yes, because the engineer signed, sealed, and submitted a blueprint that showed the design defect.\nB. Yes, because all of the plant's designers are jointly and severably liable for the defect.\nC. No, because the engineer owed no duty to the plaintiff to prevent the particular risk of harm.\nD. No, because the engineer was an independent contractor.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:07.316124+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 255, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.51", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "C", "picked": "C", "sampled": "C", "options": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:07.316165+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 256, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.50", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "After a car buyer failed to make timely payments on her auto loan and failed to respond to notices of default properly sent to her home address, the loan company hired a collection agency to repossess the car. An employee of the agency went to the buyer's home and knocked on the front door. When the buyer answered, the employee explained that he was there to repossess the car and asked for the car keys. The buyer handed the employee the keys but then asked the employee to allow her to retrieve her laptop computer from the car. The employee declined the request, explaining to the buyer that any possessions in the car could be reclaimed from the company after the car was repossessed. After pleading unsuccessfully with the employee, the buyer shoved the employee away from the door with such force that the employee fell and suffered a broken wrist. The buyer then ran to the car, which was unlocked, and retrieved the laptop. The employee has sued the buyer for battery. The buyer has moved for summary judgment, arguing that she was privileged to act as she did. Should the trial court grant the buyer's motion?\nA. No, because a fact-finder could reasonably conclude that the buyer used excessive force in attempting to defend her property.\nB. No, because after the buyer handed the keys to the employee, the car was no longer her property.\nC. Yes, because a possessor can use nonlethal force to protect his or her property.\nD. Yes, because the buyer complied with the law by returning the car keys and acted reasonably in asking to retrieve the laptop.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:07.656941+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 257, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.50", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "A", "picked": "A", "sampled": "A", "options": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:07.656982+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 258, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.185", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A woman signed up for a bowling class. Before allowing the woman to bowl, the instructor required her to sign a waiver explicitly stating that she assumed all risk of injuries that she might suffer in connection with the class, including injuries due to negligence or any other fault. After she signed the waiver, the woman was injured when the instructor negligently dropped a bowling ball on the woman's foot. The woman brought a negligence action against the instructor. The instructor has filed a motion for summary judgment based on the waiver. What is the woman's best argument in opposition to the instructor's motion?\nA. Bowling is an inherently dangerous activity.\nB. In circumstances like these, it is against public policy to enforce agreements that insulate people from the consequences of their own negligence.\nC. It was unreasonable to require the woman to sign the waiver before she was allowed to bowl.\nD. When she signed the form, the woman could not foresee that the instructor would drop a bowling ball on her foot.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:07.662710+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 259, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.185", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "B", "picked": "B", "sampled": "B", "options": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:07.662751+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 260, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.145", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A driver negligently ran over a pedestrian. A bystander witnessed the accident from across the street. The bystander ran to the pedestrian, whom he did not know, and administered first aid, but the pedestrian died in the bystander's arms. The bystander suffered serious emotional distress as a result of his failure to save the pedestrian's life, but he experienced no resulting physical manifestations. The bystander has brought a negligence action against the driver. Is the bystander likely to prevail?\nA. No, because the bystander assumed the risk.\nB. No, because the bystander had no familial or other preexisting relationship with the pedestrian.\nC. Yes, because danger invites rescue.\nD. Yes, because the bystander was in the zone of danger.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:07.716419+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 261, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.145", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "B", "picked": null, "sampled": "C", "options": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:07.716453+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 262, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.299", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "As a bartender was removing the restraining wire from a bottle of champagne produced and bottled by Winery, Inc. , the plastic stopper suddenly shot out of the bottle. The stopper struck and injured the bartender's eye. The bartender had opened other bottles of champagne, and occasionally the stoppers had shot out with great force, but the bartender had not been injured. The bartender has brought an action against Winery, Inc. , alleging that the bottle that caused his injury was defective and unreasonably dangerous because its label did not warn that the stopper might suddenly shoot out during opening. The state has merged contributory negligence and unreasonable assumption of risk into a pure comparative fault system that is applied in strict products liability actions. A jury made the following findings of fact: that the bottle was defective and unreasonably dangerous because it lacked a warning, that a legally sufficient warning would not have prevented the bartender's injury, and that a reasonable bartender would have realized that a stopper could eject from the bottle and hit his eye. Will the bartender recover a judgment in his favor?\nA. No, because a legally sufficient warning would not have prevented the bartender's injury.\nB. No, because a reasonable bartender would have realized that a stopper could eject from the bottle and hit his eye.\nC. Yes, with damages reduced by the percentage of any contributory fault on the bartender's part.\nD. Yes, with no reduction in damages, because foreseeable lack of caution is the reason for requiring a warning.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:07.800644+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 263, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.299", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "A", "picked": null, "sampled": "C", "options": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:07.800678+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 264, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.101", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "An intoxicated man who was standing on a fifth-floor apartment balcony threatened to jump off the building. A bystander pulled the man back into the building, pushed him into a bedroom, and locked the bedroom door from the outside. When the man became sober, the bystander released him from the bedroom. Does the man have a claim against the bystander?\nA. Yes, for battery, because the bystander pushed the man into the bedroom.\nB. Yes, for false imprisonment, because the bystander locked the man in the bedroom.\nC. Yes, for both battery and false imprisonment.\nD. No, because the bystander was privileged to act as he did.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:07.817441+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 265, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.101", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "D", "picked": "D", "sampled": "D", "options": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:07.817477+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 266, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.205", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A plaintiff, who was an asbestos insulation installer from 1955 to 1965, contracted asbestosis, a serious lung disorder, as a result of inhaling airborne asbestos particles on the job. The asbestos was manufactured and sold to the plaintiff's employer by an asbestos company. Because neither the asbestos company nor anyone else discovered the risk to asbestos installers until 1966, the company did not provide any warnings of the risks to installers until after that date. The plaintiff brought an action against the asbestos company based on strict liability in tort for failure to warn. The case is to be tried before a jury. The jurisdiction has not adopted a comparative fault rule in strict liability cases. In this action, an issue that is relevant to the case and is a question for the court to decide as a matter of law, rather than for the jury to decide as a question of fact, is whether\nA. a satisfactory, safer, alternative insulation material exists under today's technology.\nB. the defendant should be held to the standard of a prudent manufacturer who knew of the risks, regardless of whether the risks were reasonably discoverable before 1966.\nC. the defendant should reasonably have known of the risks of asbestos insulation materials before 1966, even though no one else had discovered the risks.\nD. the asbestos insulation materials to which the plaintiff was exposed were inherently dangerous.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:07.866774+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 267, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.205", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "B", "picked": "B", "sampled": "B", "options": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:07.866804+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 268, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.206", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A customer bought a can of corn at a grocery store. While eating the corn later that evening, the customer was injured by a small piece of glass in the corn. The customer sued the canning company that had processed and canned the corn. At trial, the customer presented evidence that neither the customer nor any third party had done anything after the can of corn was opened that would account for the presence of the glass. Without any other evidence, is the customer likely to prevail?\nA. No, because it is possible that someone tampered with the can before the customer bought it.\nB. No, because the customer has not shown any direct evidence that the canning company acted negligently.\nC. Yes, because a jury may reasonably infer that the canning company acted negligently.\nD. Yes, because the grocery store could not have discovered the piece of glass by reasonable inspection.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:07.902779+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 269, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.206", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "C", "picked": "C", "sampled": "C", "options": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:07.902815+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 270, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.62", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A dentist was anesthetizing a patient's jaw before pulling a tooth. Although the dentist used due care, the hypodermic needle broke off in the patient's gum tissue, causing injury. The needle broke because of a manufacturing defect that the dentist could not have detected. Is the patient likely to recover damages in an action against the dentist based on strict products liability and malpractice?\nA. No, on neither basis.\nB. Yes, based on malpractice, but not on strict products liability.\nC. Yes, based on strict products liability, but not on malpractice.\nD. Yes, on both bases.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:07.991651+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 271, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.62", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "A", "picked": null, "sampled": "B", "options": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:07.991691+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 272, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.129", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "The grandson and his friend, both eight years old, were visiting at the grandmother's house when, while exploring the premises, they discovered a hunting rifle in an unlocked gun cabinet. They removed it from the cabinet and were examining it when the rifle, while in the grandson's hands, somehow discharged. The bullet struck and injured the friend. The gun cabinet was normally locked. The grandmother had opened it for dusting several days before the boys' visit, and had then forgotten to relock it. She was not aware that it was unlocked when the boys arrived. At the trial on an action against the grandmother on behalf of the friend, the information above has been admitted into evidence. If the grandmother moves for a directed verdict in her favor at the of the friend's case, that motion should be\nA. granted, because the grandmother is not legally responsible for the acts of her grandson.\nB. granted, because the grandmother did not recall that the gun cabinet was unlocked.\nC. denied, because a firearm is an inherently dangerous instrumentality.\nD. denied, because a jury could find that the grandmother breached a duty of care she owed to the plaintiff.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:08.147366+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 273, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.129", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "D", "picked": "D", "sampled": "D", "options": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:08.147404+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 274, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.310", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A seller sold his boat to a buyer. During negotiations, the buyer said that he planned to sail the boat on the open seas. The seller told the buyer that the boat was seaworthy and had never sustained any significant damage. In fact, the hull of the boat had been badly damaged when the seller had run the boat aground. The seller had then done a cosmetic repair to the hull rather than a structural repair. The buyer relied on the seller's representations and paid a fair price for a boat in good repair, only to discover after the sale was completed that the hull was in fact badly damaged and in a dangerous condition. The seller has refused to refund any of the buyer's money, and the buyer is contemplating suing the seller. Under what theory would the buyer be most likely to recover?\nA. Fraud.\nB. Intentionalangerment.\nC. Negligent misrepresentation.\nD. Strict products liability.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:08.358679+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 275, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.310", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "A", "picked": null, "sampled": "C", "options": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:08.358855+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 276, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.23", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A purchaser ordered some merchandise from a store. When the merchandise was delivered, the purchaser decided that it was not what he had ordered, and he returned it for credit. The store refused to credit the purchaser's account, continued to bill him, and, after 90 days, turned the account over to a bill collector for collection. The bill collector showed up at the purchaser's house at 7 p. m. on a summer evening while many of the purchaser's neighbors were seated on their porches. When the purchaser opened the door, the bill collector, who was standing just outside the door, raised an electrically amplified bullhorn to his mouth. In a voice that could be heard a block away, the bill collector called the purchaser a \"deadbeat\" and asked him when he intended to pay his bill to the store. The purchaser, greatly angered, slammed the door shut knowing it would strike the bullhorn. The door struck the bullhorn and jammed it forcibly against the bill collector's face. As a consequence, the bill collector lost some of his front teeth. If the bill collector asserts a claim of battery against the purchaser will the bill collector prevail?\nA. Yes, because the purchaser had not first asked the bill collector to leave the property.\nB. Yes, because the purchaser knew that the door was substantially certain to strike the bullhorn.\nC. No, because the bill collector's conduct triggered the purchaser's response.\nD. No, because the bill collector was an intruder on the purchaser's property.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:08.417530+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 277, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.23", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "B", "picked": "B", "sampled": "B", "options": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:08.417584+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 278, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.230", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "For five years, a rancher had kept his horse in a ten-acre field enclosed by a six-foot woven wire fence with six inches of barbed wire on top. The gate to the field was latched and could not be opened by an animal. The rancher had never had any trouble with people coming onto his property and bothering the horse, and the horse had never escaped from the field. One day, however, when the rancher went to the field, he found that the gate was open and the horse was gone. Shortly before the rancher's discovery, a driver was driving with due care on a nearby highway when suddenly the rancher's horse darted in front of his car. When the driver attempted to avoid hitting the horse, he lost control of the car, which then crashed into a tree. The driver was injured. The driver sued the rancher to recover damages for his injuries and the rancher moved for summary judgment. If the facts stated above are undisputed, the judge should\nA. deny the motion, because pursuant to the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur, a jury could infer that the rancher was negligent.\nB. deny the motion, because an animal dangerous to highway users escaped from the rancher's property and caused the collision.\nC. grant the motion, because there is no evidence that the rancher was negligent.\nD. grant the motion, because the rancher did not knowingly permit the horse to run at large.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:08.444236+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 279, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.230", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "A", "picked": null, "sampled": "B", "options": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:08.444272+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 280, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.146", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A blasting company was conducting blasting operations in connection with a highway-widening project. Prior to setting off a charge, the blasting company supervisor posted a large warning sign and stationed a flagman to stop automobiles along the highway. Although a motorist saw and understood both the sign and the flagman's instruction to stop, the motorist nonetheless continued past the flagman and the sign and was traveling along the highway at the moment of the blast. A flying rock from the blast hit and severely damaged the motorist's car. The jurisdiction follows the traditional common law rules governing contributory negligence and assumption of risk. If the motorist pursues a claim against the blasting company to recover for the damage to the car, and all the foregoing facts are established, how much should the motorist recover?\nA. The full value of the car.\nB. The full cost of restoring the car to its condition just before the accident.\nC. The full cost of restoring the car to its condition just before the accident, reduced by the percentage by which the motorist's conduct contributed to the accident.\nD. Nothing.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:08.464987+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 281, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.146", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "D", "picked": "D", "sampled": "D", "options": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:08.465022+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 282, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.57", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A driver was traveling along a highway during an unusually heavy rainstorm when the roadway began to flood. To protect his car from water damage, the driver pulled his car up a steep, unmarked driveway abutting the highway that led to a homeowner's residence. The driver left his car parked in the driveway and walked home, intending to return when the floodwater had subsided. Shortly after the driver started to walk home, the homeowner carefully rolled the car back down his driveway and parked it on the highway shoulder. The floodwater continued to rise and caused damage to the driver's car. If the driver sues the homeowner to recover for damage to the car, is the driver likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the driver was privileged to park his car on the homeowner's property.\nB. Yes, because there were no \"no trespassing\" signs posted.\nC. No, because the driver intentionally drove his car onto the homeowner's property.\nD. No, because the homeowner was privileged to remove the car from his property.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:08.576309+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 283, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.57", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "A", "picked": null, "sampled": "D", "options": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:08.576352+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 284, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.328", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A surgeon performed a sterilization operation on a patient. After the surgery, the surgeon performed a test that showed that the patient's fallopian tubes were not severed, as was necessary for sterilization. The surgeon did not reveal the failure of the operation to the patient, who three years later became pregnant and delivered a baby afflicted with a severe birth defect that will require substantial medical care throughout its life. The birth defect resulted from a genetic defect unknown to, and undiscoverable by, the surgeon. The patient brought an action on her own behalf against the surgeon, seeking to recover the cost of her medical care for the delivery of the baby, and the baby's extraordinary future medical expenses for which the patient will be responsible. Which of the following questions is relevant to the lawsuit and currently most difficult to answer?\nA. Did the surgeon owe a duty of care to the baby with respect to medical services rendered to the patient three years before the baby was conceived?\nB. Can a person recover damages for a life burdened by a severe birth defect based on a physician's wrongful failure to prevent that person's birth from occurring?\nC. Did the surgeon owe a duty to the patient to inform her that the sterilization operation had failed?\nD. Is the patient entitled to recover damages for the baby's extraordinary future medical expenses?\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:08.611684+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 285, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.328", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "D", "picked": null, "sampled": "B", "options": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:08.611727+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 286, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.211", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A shopper was riding on an escalator in a department store when the escalator stopped abruptly. The shopper lost her balance and fell down the escalator steps, sustaining injuries. Although the escalator had been regularly maintained by an independent contractor, the store's obligation to provide safe conditions for its invitees was nondelegable. The shopper has brought an action against the store for damages, and the above facts are the only facts in evidence. The store has moved for a directed verdict. &nbsp;Should the court grant the motion?\nA. No, because the finder of fact could infer that the escalator malfunction was due to negligence.\nB. No, because the store is strictly liable for the shopper's injuries.\nC. Yes, because an independent contractor maintained the escalator.\nD. Yes, because the shopper has not produced evidence of negligence.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:08.637749+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 287, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.211", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "A", "picked": null, "sampled": "D", "options": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:08.637794+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 288, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.327", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A man rented a beach house for a weeklong vacation. On the day he arrived, just after sunset, he took his bag upstairs to a second-floor bedroom and unpacked. As he was about to head back downstairs, he realized that the stairwell had become too dark to navigate without a light. The man spent about 30 seconds feeling the walls at the top of the stairwell but could not find a light switch. In fact, the switch was located in an awkward position not reachable without descending to the second step. Although he recognized the danger of descending an unfamiliar staircase in darkness, the man started down the stairs. He lost his footing halfway down, fell, and was seriously injured. The man has sued the owner of the beach house for negligence. The jurisdiction recognizes the traditional common law defense of assumption of risk. If the action proceeds to trial, which of the following would be an appropriate (paraphrased) instruction for the court to give to the jury?\nA. \"If you conclude that the owner failed to provide reasonably safe premises, but that the man knowingly and voluntarily chose to encounter the risk of falling on the darkened stairs, then you must assign a percentage of responsibility to the man. \"\nB. \"If you conclude that the owner failed to provide reasonably safe premises, but that the man knowingly and voluntarily chose to encounter the risk of falling on the darkened stairs, then you must find for the owner. \"\nC. \"If you conclude that the owner failed to provide reasonably safe premises, but that the man was a mere licensee, then you must find for the owner. \"\nD. \"If you conclude that the owner failed to provide reasonably safe premises, then you may in your discretion award the man both compensatory and punitive damages. \"\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:08.874737+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 289, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.327", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "B", "picked": null, "sampled": "A", "options": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:08.874775+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 290, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.128", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A mother purchased an expensive television from an appliance store for her adult son. Two years after the purchase, a fire started in the son's living room in the middle of the night. The fire department concluded that the fire had started in the television. No other facts are known. The son sued the appliance store for negligence. The store has moved for summary judgment. &nbsp;Should the court grant the store's motion?\nA. No, because televisions do not catch fire in the absence of negligence.\nB. No, because the store sold the television.\nC. Yes, because the son is not in privity with the store.\nD. Yes, because there is no evidence of negligence on the part of the store.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:08.880056+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 291, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.128", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "D", "picked": "D", "sampled": "D", "options": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:08.880106+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 292, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.331", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A host pointed an unloaded revolver at her guest, threatening to shoot him. The guest knew that the revolver was not loaded, and that the ammunition for the revolver was stored in a locked basement closet, two stories below where the two were then standing. In an action brought by the guest against the host for assault, will the guest be likely to prevail?\nA. No, because the host did not intend to shoot her guest.\nB. No, because the host did not put her guest in apprehension of an imminent contact.\nC. Yes, because the ammunition was accessible to the host.\nD. Yes, because the host threatened her guest with a revolver.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:08.903078+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 293, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.331", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "B", "picked": null, "sampled": "D", "options": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:08.903114+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 294, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.40", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "Under the Federal Tort Claims Act, with certain exceptions not relevant here, the federal government is liable only for negligence. A federally owned and operated nuclear reactor emitted substantial quantities of radioactive matter that settled on a nearby dairy farm, killing the dairy herd and contaminating the soil. At the trial of an action brought against the federal government by the farm's owner, the trier of fact found the following: (1) the nuclear plant had a sound design, but a valve made by an engineering company had malfunctioned and allowed the radioactive matter to escape; (2) the engineering company was universally regarded as a quality manufacturer of components for nuclear plants; and (3) there was no way the federal government could have anticipated or prevented the emission of the radioactive matter. If there is no other applicable statute, for which party should the court enter judgment?\nA. The farm owner, on the ground that the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur applies.\nB. The farm owner, on the ground that one who allows dangerous material to escape to the property of another is liable for the damage done.\nC. The government, on the ground that a case under the Federal Tort Claims Act has not been proved.\nD. The government, on the ground that the engineering company is the proximate cause of the farm owner's damage.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:09.108537+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 295, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.40", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "C", "picked": null, "sampled": "D", "options": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:09.108607+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 296, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.314", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A six-year old boy has a well-deserved reputation for bullying younger and smaller children. His parents have encouraged him to be aggressive and tough. The child, for no reason, knocked down, kicked and severely injured his playmate, a four-year old. A claim for relief has been asserted by the playmate's parents for their medical and hospital costs and for the playmate's injuries. If the claim is asserted against the child, the most likely result is the child will be\nA. liable, because he intentionally harmed the playmate.\nB. liable, because, as a six-year-old, he should have known his conduct was wrongful.\nC. not liable, because a child under seven is not liable in tort.\nD. not liable, because he is presumed to be under his parents' control and they have the sole responsibility.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:09.156579+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 297, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.314", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "A", "picked": null, "sampled": "C", "options": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:09.156614+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 298, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.142", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "An electrical engineer designed an electronic game. The engineer entered into a licensing agreement with a toy company under which the toy company agreed to manufacture the game according to the engineer's specifications and to market it and pay a royalty to the engineer. A gamer, whose parents had purchased the game for her, was injured while playing the game. The gamer recovered a judgment against the toy company on the basis of a finding that the game was defective because of the engineer's improper design. In a claim for indemnity against the engineer, will the toy company prevail?\nA. Yes, because as between the engineer and the toy company, the engineer was responsible for the design of the game.\nB. Yes, because the toy company and the engineer were joint tortfeasors.\nC. No, because the toy company, as the manufacturer, was strictly liable to the gamer.\nD. No, because the toy company could have discovered that defect in the design of the game by reasonable inspection.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:09.213239+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 299, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.142", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "A", "picked": "A", "sampled": "A", "options": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:09.213272+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 300, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.322", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "The manager of a department store noticed that a customer was carrying a scarf with her as she examined various items in the blouse department. The manager recognized the scarf as an expensive one carried by the store. The customer was trying to find a blouse that matched a color in the scarf, and, after a while, found one. The manager then saw the customer put the scarf into her purse, pay for the blouse, and head for the door. The manager, who was eight inches taller than the customer, blocked the customer's way to the door and asked to see the scarf in the customer's purse. The customer produced the scarf, as well as a receipt for it, showing that it had been purchased from the store on the previous day. The manager then told the customer there was no problem and stepped out of her way. If the customer brings a claim against the store based on false imprisonment, the store's best defense would be that\nA. by carrying the scarf in public view and then putting it into her purse, the customer assumed the risk of being detained.\nB. the manager had a reasonable belief that the customer was shoplifting and detained her only briefly for a reasonable investigation of the facts.\nC. the customer should have realized that her conduct would create a reasonable belief that facts existed warranting a privilege to detain.\nD. the customer was not detained, but was merely questioned about the scarf.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:09.221993+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 301, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.322", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "B", "picked": "B", "sampled": "B", "options": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:09.222030+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 302, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.131", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "An assistant to a famous writer surreptitiously observed the writer as the writer typed her private password into her personal computer in order to access her email. On several subsequent occasions in the writer's absence, the assistant read the writer's email messages and printed out selections from them. The assistant later quit his job and earned a considerable amount of money by leaking information to the media that he had learned from reading the writer's email messages. All of the information published about the writer as a result of the assistant's conduct was true and concerned matters of public interest. The writer's secretary had seen the assistant reading the writer's emails and printing out selections, and she has told the writer what she saw. The writer now wishes to sue the assistant for damages. At trial, the writer can show that the media leaks could have come only from someone reading her email. Can the writer recover damages from the assistant?\nA. No, because the assistant was an invitee on the premises.\nB. No, because the published information resulting from the assistant's conduct was true and concerned matters of public interest.\nC. Yes, because the assistant invaded the writer's privacy.\nD. Yes, because the published information resulting from the assistant's conduct constituted publication of private facts concerning the writer.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:09.228319+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 303, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.131", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "C", "picked": "C", "sampled": "C", "options": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:09.228352+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 304, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.320", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A car owner left her car at a mechanic's garage to have repair work done. After completing the repairs, the mechanic took the car out for a test drive and was involved in an accident that caused damages to the plaintiff. A statute imposes liability on the owner of an automobile for injuries to a third party that are caused by the negligence of any person driving the automobile with the owner's consent. The statute applies to situations of this kind, even if the owner did not specifically authorize the mechanic to test-drive the car. The plaintiff sued the car owner and the mechanic jointly for damages arising from the accident. In that action, the car owner cross-claims to recover from the mechanic the amount of any payment the car owner may be required to make to the plaintiff. The trier of fact has determined that the accident was caused solely by negligent driving on the mechanic's part, and that the plaintiff's damages were $100,000. In this action, the proper outcome will be that\nA. The plaintiff should have judgment for $50,000 each against the car owner and the mechanic; the car owner should recover nothing from the mechanic.\nB. The plaintiff should have judgment for $100,000 against the mechanic only.\nC. The plaintiff should have judgment for $100,000 against the car owner and the mechanic jointly, and the car owner should have judgment against the mechanic for 50 percent of an amount collected from the car owner by the plaintiff.\nD. The plaintiff should have judgment for $100,000 against the car owner and the mechanic jointly, and the car owner should have judgment against the mechanic for any amount collected from the car owner by the plaintiff.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:09.370211+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 305, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.320", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "D", "picked": "D", "sampled": "D", "options": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:09.370268+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 306, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.133", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A suitor had been unsuccessfully pursuing a woman, who had recently announced her engagement to a different man. Angered by her engagement, the suitor sent the woman the following letter: \"I hope you know what you are doing. The man you think you love wears women's clothes when at home. A Friend. \" At the time the suitor sent the letter, he believed the contents to be false. The receipt of this letter caused the woman great emotional distress. She hysterically telephoned her fiance, read him the letter, and told him that she was breaking their engagement. The contents of the letter were not revealed to others. The fiance, who was a young attorney in the state attorney's office, suffered serious humiliation and emotional distress as a result of the broken engagement. If the fiance asserts a claim against the suitor based on defamation, and it is proved that the suitor's statement was true, such proof will be\nA. a defense by itself.\nB. no defense because the suitor was motivated by malice.\nC. no defense because the suitor believed it to be false.\nD. no defense by itself.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["A."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:09.464029+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 307, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.133", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "A", "picked": "A", "sampled": "A.", "options": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:09.464070+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 308, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.259", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "The police in a large city notified local gas station attendants that a woman recently had committed armed robberies at five city gas stations. The police said that the woman was approximately 75 years old, had white hair, and drove a vintage, cream-colored Ford Thunderbird. Attendants were advised to call the police if they saw her, but to not attempt to apprehend her. Armed robbery is a felony under state law. A traveler was passing through the city on a cross-country journey. The traveler was a 75-year-old woman who had white hair and drove a vintage, cream-colored Ford Thunderbird. When the traveler drove into a gas station, the owner of the station thought the traveler must be the robber wanted by the police. After checking the oil at the traveler's request, the owner falsely informed the traveler that she had a broken fan belt, that her car could not be driven without a new belt, that it would take him about an hour to replace it, and that she should stay in his office for consultation about the repair. The traveler was greatly annoyed that her journey was delayed, but she stayed in the owner's office while she waited for her car. The owner telephoned the police and, within the hour, the police came and questioned the traveler. The police immediately determined that the traveler was not the woman, and the traveler resumed her journey without further delay. In the traveler's action for false imprisonment against the owner, the traveler will\nA. not prevail, because the owner reasonably believed that the traveler was the wanted woman.\nB. not prevail, because the traveler suffered no physical or mental harm.\nC. prevail, because the traveler reasonably believed she could not leave the owner's premises.\nD. prevail, because the owner lied to the traveler about the condition of her car.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:09.536586+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 309, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.259", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "A", "picked": null, "sampled": "C", "options": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:09.536639+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 310, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.77", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A man owned a shotgun that he used for hunting. The man knew that his old friend had become involved with a violent gang that recently had a shoot-out with a rival gang. The man, who was going to a farm to hunt quail, placed his loaded shotgun on the back seat of his car. On his way to the farm, the man picked up his old friend to give him a ride to someone's house. After dropping off his old friend at the house, the man proceeded to the farm, where he discovered that his shotgun was missing from his car. The old friend had taken the shotgun and, later in the day, the old friend used it to shoot a member of the rival gang. The gang member was severely injured. The gang member recovered a judgment for his damages against the man, as well as the old friend, on the ground that the man was negligent in allowing his old friend to obtain possession of the gun, and was therefore liable jointly and severally with the old friend for the gang member's damages. The jurisdiction has a statute that allows contribution based upon proportionate fault and adheres to the traditional common-law rules on indemnity. If the man fully satisfies the judgment, he then will have a right to recover from the old friend\nA. indemnity for the full amount of the judgment, because the old friend was an intentional tortfeasor.\nB. contribution only, based on comparative fault, because the man himself was negligent.\nC. one-half of the amount of the judgment.\nD. nothing, because the man's negligence was a substantial proximate cause of the shooting.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:09.645027+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 311, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.77", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "A", "picked": null, "sampled": "C", "options": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:09.645093+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 312, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.109", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A boater was rowing a boat on a mountain lake when a storm suddenly arose. Fearful that the boat might sink, the boater rowed to a boat dock on shore and tied the boat to the dock. The shore property and dock were on private property. While the boat was tied at the dock, the owner of the dock came down and ordered the boater to remove the boat because the action of the waves was causing the boat to rub against a bumper on the dock. When the boater refused, the owner untied the boat and cast it adrift. The boat sank. The boater was wearing a pair of swimming trunks, nothing else. He had a pair of shoes and a parka in the boat, but they were lost when the owner set it adrift. The boater was staying at a cabin one mile from the owner's property. The only land routes back were a short rocky trail that was dangerous during the storm, and a 15-mile road around the lake. The storm continued with heavy rain and hail, and the boater having informed the owner of the location of his cabin, asked the owner to take him back there in the owner's car. The owner said, \"You got here by yourself and you'll have to get back home yourself. \" After one hour the storm stopped, and the boater walked home over the trail. A necessary element in determining if the boater is liable for a trespass is whether\nA. the owner had clearly posted his property with a sign indicating that it was private property.\nB. the boater knew that the property belonged to a private person.\nC. the boater had reasonable grounds to believe the property belonged to a private person.\nD. the boater had reasonable grounds to believe his boat might be swamped and sink.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:09.687374+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 313, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.109", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "D", "picked": null, "sampled": "B", "options": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:09.687415+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 314, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.235", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "While a driver was taking a leisurely spring drive, he momentarily took his eyes off the road to look at some colorful trees in bloom. As a result, his car swerved a few feet off the roadway, directly toward a pedestrian, who was standing on the shoulder of the road waiting for a chance to cross. When the pedestrian saw the car bearing down on him, he jumped backwards, fell, and injured his knee. The pedestrian sued the driver for damages, and the driver moved for summary judgment. The foregoing facts are undisputed. The driver's motion should be\nA. denied, because the record shows that the pedestrian apprehended an imminent, harmful contact, with the driver's car.\nB. denied, because a jury could find that the driver negligently caused the pedestrian to suffer a legally compensable injury.\nC. granted, because the proximate cause of the pedestrian's injury was his own voluntary act.\nD. granted, because it is not unreasonable for a person to be distracted momentarily.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:09.732879+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 315, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.235", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "B", "picked": "B", "sampled": "B", "options": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:09.732916+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 316, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.224", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A fumigation company was hired to eliminate pests in one of two buildings in a condominium complex that shared a common wall. The owners of the complex told the fumigation company that the common wall separating the infested building from the uninfested building was an impenetrable fire wall. The fumigation company did its own thorough inspection and determined that the buildings were indeed completely separated by the wall. Residents of the condominium units in the building that was to be sprayed were told to evacuate, but the residents of the uninfested building were told that they could remain while the other building was treated. During and shortly after the fumigation, in which a highly toxic chemical was used, many residents of the uninfested building became sick. It was determined that their illnesses were caused by the fumigation chemical. In fact, there was a hole in the fire wall separating the two buildings, but because it could only be observed from a specific position in the crawl space underneath the floor of the uninfested building, it had not been discovered by either the fumigation company or any previous building inspector. Are the residents of the uninfested building likely to prevail in a tort action against the fumigation company?\nA. No, because the condominium complex owners were responsible for accurately conveying the condition of their buildings.\nB. No, because the fumigation company exercised a high level of care.\nC. Yes, because the fumigation company can be held strictly liable for its activity.\nD. Yes, because the fumigation company put a dangerous product into the stream of commerce.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:09.832363+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 317, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.224", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "C", "picked": "C", "sampled": "C", "options": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:09.832424+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 318, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.115", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A man and a woman were competing in an illegal drag race. Both of them were driving over the speed limit but were otherwise driving very carefully. However, when a tire on the woman's car suddenly blew out, she lost control of her car and crashed, injuring a pedestrian. The pedestrian later sued the man, because the woman had no insurance or assets. Will the pedestrian be likely to prevail in that action?\nA. No, because the man did not cause the injury.\nB. No, because the man was driving very carefully.\nC. Yes, because the man and the woman were acting in concert in a dangerous activity.\nD. Yes, because the man was exceeding the speed limit.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:09.955318+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 319, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.115", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "C", "picked": "C", "sampled": "C", "options": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:09.955387+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 320, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.237", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A bus passenger was seated next to a woman whom he did not know. The woman stood to exit the bus, leaving a package on the seat. The passenger lightly tapped the woman on the back to get her attention and to inform her that she had forgotten the package. Because the woman had recently had back surgery, the tap was painful and caused her to twist and seriously injure her back. If the woman sues the passenger to recover for the back injury, will she be likely to prevail?\nA. No, because she is presumed to have consented to the ordinary contacts of daily life.\nB. No, because she was not put in apprehension by the touching.\nC. Yes, because the passenger intentionally touched her.\nD. Yes, because the passenger's intentional touching seriously injured her.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:09.988522+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 321, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.237", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "A", "picked": null, "sampled": "D", "options": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:09.988616+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 322, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.268", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "When the defendant heard that his neighbor intended to sell his home to a minority purchaser, the defendant told his neighbor that the neighbor and his wife and children would meet with \"accidents\" if he did so. The neighbor then called the prospective purchaser and told him that he was taking the house off the market. If the neighbor asserts a claim against the defendant for intentional infliction of emotional distress the neighbor will\nA. recover, if the neighbor suffered severe emotional distress as a consequence of the defendant's conduct.\nB. recover, because the defendant intended to frighten the neighbor.\nC. not recover, because the defendant made no threat of immediate physical harm to the neighbor or his family.\nD. not recover, because the neighbor suffered no physical harm as a consequence of the defendant's conduct.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:10.061537+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 323, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.268", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "A", "picked": "A", "sampled": "A", "options": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:10.061585+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 324, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.238", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "For 10 years, a vacationer and a neighbor have owned summer vacation homes on adjoining lots. A stream flows through both lots. As a result of a childhood swimming accident, the vacationer is afraid of water and has never gone close to the stream. The neighbor built a dam on her property that has completely stopped the flow of the stream to the vacationer's property. The dam unreasonably interferes with the use and enjoyment of the vacationer's property but was built in conformity with all applicable laws. In a suit by the vacationer against the neighbor, will the vacationer prevail?\nA. Yes, because the damming unreasonably interferes with the use and enjoyment of the vacationer's property.\nB. Yes, because the neighbor intended to affect the vacationer's property.\nC. No, because the vacationer made no use of the stream.\nD. No, because the dam was built in conformity with all applicable laws.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:10.187895+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 325, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.238", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "A", "picked": "A", "sampled": "A", "options": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:10.187974+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 326, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.217", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "The owner of a shopping mall hired a construction company to design and construct a new entryway to the mall. The construction company negligently selected an unusually slippery material for the floor covering. A week after the entryway was completed, a customer who had come to the mall to buy cosmetics slipped on the floor of the entryway, sustaining injuries. The customer sued the mall owner for the construction company's negligent design of the mall's entryway. Will the injured customer be likely to recover damages?\nA. No, because the construction company will likely be considered an independent contractor.\nB. No, because no other customers had previously slipped on the floor.\nC. Yes, because the customer intended to make a purchase at the mall.\nD. Yes, because the mall's duty to maintain safe conditions was nondelegable.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:10.317595+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 327, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.217", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "D", "picked": "D", "sampled": "D", "options": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:10.317673+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 328, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.15", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A man was in the act of siphoning gasoline from a neighbor's car in the neighbor's garage and without his consent when the gasoline exploded and caused a fire. A rescuer, seeing the fire, grabbed a fire extinguisher from his car and put out the fire, saving the man's life and the neighbor's car and garage. In doing so, the rescuer was badly burned. If the rescuer asserts a claim against the neighbor for personal injuries, the rescuer will\nA. prevail, because he saved the neighbor's property.\nB. prevail, because he acted reasonably in an emergency.\nC. not prevail, because the neighbor was not at fault.\nD. not prevail, because the rescuer knowingly assumed the risk.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:10.349960+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 329, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.15", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "C", "picked": null, "sampled": "B", "options": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:10.350006+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 330, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.150", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A patron ate a spicy dinner at a restaurant on Sunday night. He enjoyed the food and noticed nothing unusual about the dinner. Later that evening, the patron had an upset stomach. He slept well through the night, went to work the next day, and ate three meals. His stomach discomfort persisted, and by Tuesday morning he was too ill to go to work. Eventually, the patron consulted his doctor, who found that the patron was infected with a bacterium that can be contracted from contaminated food. Food can be contaminated when those who prepare it do not adequately wash their hands. The patron sued the restaurant for damages. He introduced testimony from a health department official that various health code violations had been found at the restaurant both before and after the patron's dinner, but that none of the restaurant's employees had signs of bacterial infection when they were tested one month after the incident. The restaurant's best argument in response to the patron's suit would be that\nA. no one else who ate at the restaurant on Sunday complained about stomach discomfort.\nB. the restaurant instructs its employees to wash their hands carefully and is not responsible if any employee fails to follow these instructions.\nC. the patron has failed to establish that the restaurant's food caused his illness.\nD. the patron assumed the risk of an upset stomach by choosing to eat spicy food.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:10.453432+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 331, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.150", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "C", "picked": "C", "sampled": "C", "options": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:10.453491+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 332, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.98", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A sporting goods shop was burglarized by an escaped inmate from a nearby prison. The inmate stole a rifle and bullets from a locked cabinet. The burglar alarm at the shop did not go off because the shop's owner had negligently forgotten to activate the alarm's motion detector. Shortly thereafter, the inmate used the rifle ammunition stolen from the shop in a shooting spree that caused injury to several people, including the plaintiff. If the plaintiff sues the shop's owner for the injury she suffered, will the plaintiff prevail?\nA. Yes, because the plaintiff's injury could have been prevented had the motion detector been activated.\nB. Yes, because the shop's owner was negligent in failing to activate the motion detector.\nC. No, because the storage and sale of firearms and ammunition is not an abnormally dangerous activity.\nD. No, because there is no evidence of circumstances suggesting a high risk of theft and criminal use of firearms stocked by the shop's owner.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:10.490025+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 333, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.98", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "D", "picked": "D", "sampled": "D", "options": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:10.490131+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 334, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.277", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A widow recently purchased a new uncrated electric range for her kitchen from a local retailer. The range has a wide oven with a large oven door. The crate in which the manufacturer shipped the range carried a warning label that the stove would tip over with a weight of 25 pounds or more on the oven door. The widow has one child, aged three. Recently, the child was playing on the floor of the kitchen while the widow was heating water in a pan on the stove. When the widow left the kitchen for a moment, the child opened the oven door and climbed on it to see what was in the pan. The child's weight (25 pounds) on the door caused the stove to tip over forward. The child fell to the floor and the hot water spilled over her, burning her severely. The widow ran to the kitchen and immediately gave her first aid treatment for burns. The child thereafter received medical treatment. The child's burns were painful. They have now healed and do not bother her, but she has ugly scars on her legs and back. The child's claim is asserted on her behalf by the proper party. If the child asserts a claim based on strict liability against the manufacturer, she must establish that\nA. the defendant negligently designed the stove.\nB. stoves made by other manufacturers do not turn over with a 25-pound weight on the oven door.\nC. the defendant failed to warn the widow that the stove would turn over easily.\nD. the stove was defective and unreasonably dangerous to her.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:10.504561+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 335, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.277", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "D", "picked": "D", "sampled": "D", "options": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:10.504601+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 336, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.252", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A mother purchased over-the-counter pain medication for her daughter, who suffered from headaches. The packaging indicated that the pills were \"coated\" but did not list the ingredients in the coating. A few days after she bought the medication, because the daughter was in extreme pain, the mother gave the daughter three times the recommended dose of the medication. Thirty minutes later, because the daughter had a very rare allergy to an ingredient in the coating, she had a severe allergic reaction, for which she was hospitalized. The mother was aware of the daughter's allergy, but she did not know that the medication contained the ingredient to which the daughter was allergic. In a failure-to-warn action brought against the manufacturer of the medication, which of the arguments below would be the LEAST promising as a defense?\nA. The daughter's allergy to the ingredient in the coating was very rare.\nB. The manufacturer's duty was to warn learned intermediaries, not consumers of the medication.\nC. The mother should not have given her daughter a triple dose of the medication.\nD. The mother, knowing of her daughter's very rare allergy, should not have purchased the medication without knowing what ingredients were in the coating.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:10.603813+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 337, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.252", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "B", "picked": null, "sampled": "C", "options": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:10.603896+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 338, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.86", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A boater was rowing a boat on a mountain lake when a storm suddenly arose. Fearful that the boat might sink, the boater rowed to a boat dock on shore and tied the boat to the dock. The shore property and dock were on private property. While the boat was tied at the dock, the dock owner came down and ordered the boater to remove the boat because the action of the waves was causing the boat to rub against a bumper on the dock. When the boater refused, the owner untied the boat and cast it adrift. The boat sank. The boater was wearing a pair of swimming trunks, nothing else. He had a pair of shoes and a parka in the boat, but they were lost when the owner set it adrift. The boater was staying at a cabin one mile from the owner's property. The only land routes back were a short rocky trail that was dangerous during the storm, and a 15-mile road around the lake. The storm continued with heavy rain and hail, and the boater having informed the owner of the location of his cabin, asked the owner to take him back there in the owner's car. The owner said, \"You got here by yourself and you'll have to get back home yourself. \" After one hour the storm stopped, and the boater walked home over the trail. If the boater asserts a claim against the owner for loss of the boat, the most likely result is that the owner will\nA. have no defense under the circumstances.\nB. prevail, because the boater was a trespasser ab initio.\nC. prevail, because the boat might have damaged the dock.\nD. prevail, because the boater became a trespasser when he refused to remove the boat.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:10.689485+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 339, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.86", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "A", "picked": null, "sampled": "D", "options": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:10.689547+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 340, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.257", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A plaintiff, who was 20 years old, purchased a new, high-powered sports car that was marketed with an intended and recognized appeal to youthful drivers. The car was designed with the capability to attain speeds in excess of 100 miles per hour. It was equipped with tires designed and tested only for a maximum safe speed of 85 miles per hour. The owner's manual that came with the car stated that \"continuous driving over 90 miles per hour requires high-speed-capability tires,\" but the manual did not describe the speed capability of the tires sold with the car. The plaintiff took her new car out for a spin on a straight, smooth country road where the posted speed limit was 55 miles per hour. Intending to test the car's power, she drove for a considerable distance at over 100 miles per hour. While she was doing so, the tread separated from the left rear tire, causing the car to leave the road and hit a tree. The plaintiff sustained severe injuries. The plaintiff has brought a strict product liability action in tort against the manufacturer of the car. You should assume that pure comparative fault principles apply to this case. Will the plaintiff prevail?\nA. No, because the plaintiff's driving at an excessive speed constituted a misuse of the car.\nB. No, because the car was not defective.\nC. Yes, because the statement in the manual concerning the tires did not adequately warn of the danger of high-speed driving on the tires mounted on the car.\nD. No, because the plaintiff's driving at a speed in excess of the posted speed limit was negligence per se that was not excusable.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:10.735428+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 341, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.257", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "C", "picked": "C", "sampled": "C", "options": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:10.735473+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 342, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.182", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "In 1970, a cattle company paid $30,000 for a 150-acre tract of agricultural land well suited for a cattle feedlot. The tract was 10 miles from the city and five miles from the nearest home. By 2006, the city limits extended to the cattle company's feedlot. About 10,000 people lived within three miles of the cattle-feeding operation. The cattle company land is outside the city limits and no zoning ordinance applies. The cattle company land is now worth $300,000, and $25,000 has been invested in buildings and pens. The cattle company uses the best and most sanitary feedlot procedures, including chemical sprays, to keep down flies and odors and frequently removes manure. Despite these measures, residents of the city complain of flies and odors. An action has been filed by five individual homeowners who live within half a mile of the cattle company feedlot. The plaintiffs' homes are valued currently at $25,000 to $40,000 each. Flies in the area are five to 10 times more numerous than in other parts of the city, and extremely obnoxious odors are frequently carried by the wind to the plaintiffs' homes. The flies and odors are a substantial health hazard. If the plaintiffs assert a claim based on nuisance, plaintiffs will\nA. prevail, because the cattle company's activity unreasonably interferes with plaintiffs' use and enjoyment of their property.\nB. prevail, because the cattle company's activity constitutes an inverse condemnation of their property.\nC. not prevail, because the cattle company had operated the feedlot for more than 25 years.\nD. not prevail, because the cattle company uses the most reasonable procedures to keep down flies and odors.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:10.738610+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 343, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.182", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "A", "picked": "A", "sampled": "A", "options": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:10.738667+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 344, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.335", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A supermarket is in a section of town where there are sometimes street fights and where pedestrians are occasionally the victims of pickpockets and muggers. In recognition of the unusual number of robberies in the area, the supermarket posted signs in the store that read:\"Warning: There are pickpockets and muggers at work in this part of the city. The supermarket is not responsible for the acts of criminals. \"Other than posting the signs, the supermarket took no other precautions to prevent criminal activity on the premises. One evening, a customer drove to the supermarket to see about a special on turkeys that the supermarket was advertising. She decided that the turkeys were too large and left the store without purchasing anything. In the parking lot, she was attacked by an unknown man who raped her and then ran away. If the customer sues the supermarket, the result should be for the\nA. plaintiff, because the supermarket failed to take reasonable steps to protect customers against criminal attack in its parking lot.\nB. plaintiff, because the supermarket is liable for harm to business invitees on its premises.\nC. defendant, because the warning signs were visible to the customer.\nD. defendant, because the rapist was the proximate cause of the customer's injuries.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:10.990413+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 345, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.335", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "A", "picked": "A", "sampled": "A", "options": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:10.990464+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 346, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.32", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A truck driver was driving along a lonely road on a very cold night. He saw a man lying in a field by the side of the road and apparently injured. The truck driver stopped his truck, alighted, and, upon examination, discovered that the man was intoxicated and in danger of suffering from exposure to the cold. However, the truck driver returned to his truck and drove away without making any effort to help the man, who remained lying at the same place and was later injured when struck by a car driven by a traveler who, drowsy and inattentive, had veered off the road into the field and hit the man. The traveler did not see the man prior to hitting him. If the man asserts a claim against the traveler, will the man prevail?\nA. Yes, because the traveler was negligent in going off the road.\nB. Yes, because the man was in a helpless condition.\nC. No, because the traveler did not see the man before he was struck.\nD. No, because the man's intoxication was the cause in fact of his harm.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:11.014233+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 347, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.32", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "A", "picked": null, "sampled": "D", "options": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:11.014284+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 348, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.94", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "The personnel director of an investment company told a job applicant during an interview that the company was worth millions of dollars and that the company's portfolio would triple in the next several months. The applicant was very excited about the company's prospects and accepted an offer to work for the company. Two days later, the applicant read in the newspaper that the investment company had filed for bankruptcy reorganization. As a result of reading this news, the applicant suffered severe emotional distress, but he immediately found another comparable position. Is the applicant likely to prevail in an action for negligent misrepresentation?\nA. No, because the applicant did not suffer any physical injury or pecuniary loss.\nB. No, because the personnel director's statement was purely speculative.\nC. Yes, because the applicant relied on the personnel director's misrepresentations about the investment company.\nD. Yes, because the personnel director should have foreseen that his misrepresentations would cause the applicant to be distressed.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:11.143689+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 349, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.94", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "A", "picked": null, "sampled": "C", "options": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:11.143772+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 350, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.167", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A trucker was making a delivery to a market that is located on the northeast corner of the intersection of Pine and Maple, both one-way streets. Traffic runs northbound on Maple and eastbound on Pine. Both streets have two stoplights each for oncoming traffic. At the time of delivery, there was insufficient space for the truck and its enclosed trailer in front of the market, so the trucker parked in such a way that the trailer extended entirely across the crosswalk on the north side of the intersection, obscuring the northeast traffic light that controlled oncoming eastbound traffic on Pine. Unknown to the trucker, the traffic light on the southeast corner of Pine had been knocked to the ground. A woman, driving east towards the intersection, could not see the red traffic light for eastbound traffic because the truck's trailer was blocking it. A man driving north entered the intersection without looking both ways and struck the woman's car. The man received personal injuries, and the woman's car was damaged severely as a result of the impact. State statutes in place make it a misdemeanor to park a motor vehicle so that any part projects into a crosswalk, and to enter an intersection contrary to a traffic signal. If the man asserts a claim against the trucker and establishes that the trucker was negligent, the likely result is that the trucker's negligence was\nA. a legal but not an actual cause of the man's injuries.\nB. an actual but not a legal cause of the man's injuries.\nC. both an actual and a legal cause of the man's injuries.\nD. neither an actual nor a legal cause of the man's injuries.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:11.220336+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 351, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.167", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "C", "picked": "C", "sampled": "C", "options": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:11.220445+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 352, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.74", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A firstborn child was examined as an infant by a doctor who was a specialist in the diagnosis of speech and hearing impairments. Although the doctor should have concluded that the infant was totally deaf due to a hereditary condition, the doctor negligently concluded that the infant's hearing was normal. After the diagnosis, but before they learned that the infant was in fact deaf, the parents conceived a second child who also suffered total deafness due to the hereditary condition. The parents claim that they would not have conceived the second child had they known of the high probability of the hereditary condition. They have sought the advice of their attorney regarding which negligence action against the doctor is most likely to succeed. What sort of action against the doctor should the attorney recommend?\nA. A medical malpractice action seeking damages on the second child's behalf for expenses related to his deafness, on the ground that the doctor's negligence caused him to be born deaf.\nB. A wrongful birth action by the parents for expenses they have incurred due to the second child's deafness, on the ground that but for the doctor's negligence, they would not have conceived the second child.\nC. A wrongful life action by the parents for expenses for the entire period of the second child's life, on the ground that but for the doctor's negligence, the second child would not have been born.\nD. A wrongful life action on the second child's behalf for expenses for the entire period of his life, on the ground that but for the doctor's negligence, he would not have been born.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:11.233888+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 353, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.74", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "B", "picked": "B", "sampled": "B", "options": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:11.233933+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 354, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.303", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A man rented a car from a car rental agency. Unbeknownst to the rental agency, the car had a bomb hidden in it at the time of the rental. The bomb exploded an hour later, injuring the man. Immediately prior to renting the car to the man, the rental agency had carefully inspected the car to be sure it was in sound operating condition. The rental agency did not inspect for hidden explosive devices, but such an inspection would have revealed the bomb. There had been no previous incidents of persons hiding bombs in rental cars. In a negligence action by the man against the car rental agency, is the man likely to prevail?\nA. No, because the rental agency could not have reasonably foreseen the likelihood of someone placing a bomb in the car it was about to rent to the man.\nB. No, because the rental agency did not hide the bomb in the car.\nC. Yes, because an inspection for explosive devices would have revealed the bomb.\nD. Yes, because the bomb made the car abnormally dangerous.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:11.289945+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 355, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.303", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "A", "picked": "A", "sampled": "A", "options": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:11.289981+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 356, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.270", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "In the course of a bank holdup, a robber fired a gun at a guard. The guard drew his revolver and returned fire. One of the bullets fired by the guard ricocheted, striking the plaintiff, who was simply a customer at the bank. If the plaintiff asserts a claim against the guard based upon battery, will the plaintiff prevail?\nA. Yes, because the plaintiff was not the robber's accomplice.\nB. Yes, under the doctrine of transferred intent.\nC. No, because the guard fired reasonably in his own defense.\nD. No, because the guard did not intend to shoot the plaintiff.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:11.338725+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 357, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.270", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "C", "picked": null, "sampled": "D", "options": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:11.338766+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 358, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.78", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A light company is the sole distributor of electrical power in a city. The company owns and maintains all of the electric poles and equipment in the city. The company has complied with the National Electrical Safety Code, which established minimum requirements for the installation and maintenance of power poles. The code has been approved by the federal and state governments. The company has had to constantly replace insulators on its poles because unknown people repeatedly shoot at and destroy them. This causes the power lines to fall to the ground. The light company did not use other reasonable means to secure the lines to the poles. On an occasion when the lines had fallen, a five-year-old child wandered out of his yard, intentionally touched a downed wire, and was seriously burned. If a claim on the child's behalf is asserted against the light company, the probable result is that the child will\nA. recover, because the light company could have taken reasonable steps to prevent the lines from falling when the insulators were destroyed.\nB. recover, because a supplier of electricity is strictly liable in tort.\nC. not recover, because the light company exercised reasonable care to stop the destruction of the insulators.\nD. not recover, because the destruction of the insulators was intentional.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:11.459558+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 359, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.78", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "A", "picked": "A", "sampled": "A", "options": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:11.459659+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 360, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.99", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A manufacturing plant located near a busy highway uses and stores highly volatile explosives. The owner of the plant has imposed strict safety measures to prevent an explosion at the plant. During an unusually heavy windstorm, a large tile was blown off the roof of the plant and crashed into a passing car, damaging the hood and the windshield. The driver of the car brought a strict liability action against the owner of the plant to recover for the damage to the car. Is the driver likely to prevail?\nA. No, because the damage to the car did not result from the abnormally dangerous aspect of the plant's activity.\nB. No, because the severity of the windstorm was unusual.\nC. Yes, because the plant's activity was abnormally dangerous.\nD. Yes, because the plant's location near a busy highway was abnormally dangerous.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:11.515596+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 361, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.99", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "A", "picked": "A", "sampled": "A", "options": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:11.515632+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 362, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.282", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A defendant's dog ran into the street in front of the defendant's home and began chasing cars. The plaintiff, who was driving a car on the street, swerved to avoid hitting the dog, struck a telephone pole, and was injured. Assume that the defendant knew his dog would often chase cars but refused to restrain it. If the plaintiff asserts a claim against the defendant, will the plaintiff prevail?\nA. Yes, because the defendant's dog was a cause in fact of the plaintiff's injury.\nB. Yes, because the defendant knew his dog had a propensity to chase cars and did not restrain it.\nC. No, because a dog is a domestic animal.\nD. No, because there is no statute or ordinance making it unlawful for the owner to allow a dog to be unleashed on a public street.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:11.534770+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 363, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.282", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "B", "picked": "B", "sampled": "B", "options": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:11.534857+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 364, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.132", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A construction company was digging a trench for a new sewer line in a street in a high-crime neighborhood. During the course of the construction, there had been many thefts of tools and equipment from the construction area. One night, the construction company's employees neglected to place warning lights around the trench. A delivery truck drove into the trench and broke an axle. While the truck driver was looking for a telephone to call a tow truck, thieves broke into the truck and stole $350,000 worth of goods. The delivery company sued the construction company to recover for the $350,000 loss and for the damage to its truck. The construction company has stipulated that it was negligent in failing to place warning lights around the trench and admits liability for damage to the truck, but it denies liability for the loss of the goods. On cross-motions for summary judgment on the claim for the goods, how should the court rule?\nA. Deny both motions, because there is evidence to support a finding that the construction company should have realized that its negligence could create an opportunity for a third party to commit a crime.\nB. Grant the construction company's motion, because no one could have foreseen that the failure to place warning lights could result in the loss of a cargo of valuable goods.\nC. Grant the construction company's motion, because the criminal acts of third persons were a superseding cause of the loss.\nD. Grant the delivery company's motion, because but for the construction company's actions, the goods would not have been stolen.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:11.757769+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 365, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.132", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "A", "picked": "A", "sampled": "A", "options": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:11.757809+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 366, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.160", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A chemical company manufactured a liquid chemical product known as XRX. Some XRX leaked from a storage tank on the chemical company's property, seeped into the groundwater, flowed to a farmer's adjacent property, and polluted the farmer's well. Several of the farmer's cows drank the polluted well water and died. If the farmer brings an action against the chemical company to recover the value of the cows that died, the farmer will\nA. prevail, because a manufacturer is strictly liable for harm caused by its products.\nB. prevail, because the XRX escaped from the chemical company's premises.\nC. not prevail, because the farmer is not a foreseeable plaintiff.\nD. not prevail, because the chemical company was not engaged in an abnormally dangerous activity.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:11.856438+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 367, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.160", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "B", "picked": null, "sampled": "A", "options": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:11.856478+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 368, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.14", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A woman worked as a secretary in an office in a building occupied partly by her employer and partly by a retail store. The two areas were separated by walls and were in no way connected, except that the air conditioning unit served both areas and there was a common return-air duct. The retail store began remodeling, and its employees did the work, which included affixing a plastic surfacing material to counters. To fasten the plastic to the counters, the employees purchased glue from a manufacturer that was packaged in a sealed container by the manufacturer and retailed by a paint company. In the course of the remodeling job, one of the retail store's employees turned on the air conditioning and caused fumes from the glue to travel from the retail store through the air conditioning unit and into the woman's office. The employees did not know that there was common duct work for the air conditioners. The woman was permanently blinded by the fumes from the glue. The label on the container of glue read, \"DANGER. Do not smoke near this product. Extremely flammable. Contains Butanone, Tuluol, and Hexane. Use with adequate ventilation. Keep out of the reach of children. \"The three chemicals listed on the label are very toxic and harmful to human eyes. The manufacturer had received no reports of eye injuries during the 10 years that the product had been manufactured and sold. If the woman asserts a claim against the retail store, the most likely result is that she will\nA. recover, because a user of a product is held to the same standard as the manufacturer.\nB. recover, because the employees of the retail store caused the fumes to enter her area of the building.\nC. not recover, because the retail store used the glue for its intended purposes.\nD. not recover, because the employees of the retail store had no reason to know that the fumes could injure the woman.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:11.916627+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 369, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.14", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "D", "picked": null, "sampled": "B", "options": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:11.916667+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 370, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.60", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A defendant negligently caused a fire in his house, and the house burned to the ground. As a result, the sun streamed into the plaintiff's yard next door, which previously had been shaded by the defendant's house. The sunshine destroyed some delicate and valuable trees in the plaintiff's yard that could grow only in the shade. The plaintiff has brought a negligence action against the defendant for the loss of the plaintiff's trees. The defendant has moved to dismiss the complaint. The best argument in support of this motion would be that\nA. the defendant's negligence was not the active cause of the loss of the plaintiff's trees.\nB. the defendant's duty to avoid the risks created by a fire did not encompass the risk that sunshine would damage the plaintiff's trees.\nC. the loss of the trees was not a natural and probable consequence of the defendant's negligence.\nD. the plaintiff suffered a purely economic loss, which is not compensable in a negligence action.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:11.930716+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 371, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.60", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "B", "picked": "B", "sampled": "B", "options": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:11.930756+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 372, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.20", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A complaint filed on behalf of a woman against a nursing home and an ambulance service included the following allegations:The woman, who was 86 years old and unable to speak after suffering a stroke, was picked up from her daughter's house by the ambulance service and taken to the nursing home to stay while her daughter was out of town. When the woman's daughter returned a few days later, the ambulance service picked up the woman from the nursing home and returned her to the daughter's house. The daughter was shocked to discover that the woman had a broken leg; her leg had been uninjured when she left for the nursing home. A physician's report attached to the complaint stated that the woman's leg injury would not have occurred in the absence of negligence. The complaint further alleged that the woman was under the control, successively, of the ambulance service and the nursing home during the time when she must have sustained the injury, and that either the ambulance service or the nursing home must have negligently moved or handled the woman, causing the injury to her leg. Both defendants have argued that the allegations in the complaint are inadequate to support a negligence claim. What is the best response to the defendants' argument?\nA. Both defendants owed a duty to the woman.\nB. One of the two defendants probably caused the injury, and the circumstances of the injury are primarily within the knowledge and control of the defendants rather than the woman or her representative.\nC. The defendants are concurrent tortfeasors, so each is vicariously liable for any tortious act committed by the other.\nD. There are grounds for the fact-finder to infer that both defendants were negligent.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:12.004561+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 373, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.20", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "B", "picked": "B", "sampled": "B", "options": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:12.004599+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 374, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.273", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A four-year-old child sustained serious injuries when a playmate pushed him from between two parked cars into the street, where he was struck by a car. The child, by his representative, sued the driver of the car, the playmate's parents, and his own parents. At trial, the child's total damages were determined to be $100,000. The playmate's parents were determined to be 20% at fault because they had failed to adequately supervise her. The driver was found to be 50% at fault. The child's own parents were determined to be 30% at fault for failure to adequately supervise him. The court has adopted the pure comparative negligence doctrine, with joint and several liability, in place of the common law rules relating to plaintiff's fault. In addition, the common law doctrines relating to intra-family liability have been abrogated. What is the maximum amount, if anything, that the child's representative can recover from the driver?\nA. $30,000.\nB. $50,000.\nC. $100,000.\nD. Nothing.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:12.071850+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 375, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.273", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "C", "picked": null, "sampled": "B", "options": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:12.071913+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 376, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.95", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A buyer wanted to purchase a used motor vehicle. The used car lot of a car company, in a remote section away from town, was enclosed by a ten-foot chain link fence. While the buyer and a sales representative of the car company were in the used car lot looking at cars, a security guard locked the gate after completing his final inspection at 1:30 p. m. Because it was Saturday, the lot was supposed to be closed after 1:00 p. m. Saturday until Monday morning. At 1:45 p. m. the buyer and the sales representative discovered they were locked in. There was no traffic in the vicinity and no way in which help could be summoned. After two hours, the buyer began to panic at the prospect of remaining undiscovered and without food and water until Monday morning. The sales representative decided to wait in a car until help should come. The buyer tried to climb over the fence and, in doing so, fell and was injured. The buyer asserts a claim against the car company for damages for his injuries. If the buyer's claim is based on false imprisonment, will the buyer prevail?\nA. Yes, because he was confined against his will.\nB. Yes, because he was harmed as a result of his confinement.\nC. Yes, because the security guard was negligent in locking the gate.\nD. No, because the security guard did not know that someone was in the lot at the time he locked the gate.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:12.178827+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 377, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.95", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "D", "picked": null, "sampled": "A", "options": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:12.178872+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 378, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.173", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "While visiting at his son's home, a grandfather tripped on a toy left on the floor by his four-year- old grandson. The grandfather fell and was severely injured. The grandfather regularly visited his son's home and was aware that the grandson routinely left toys scattered about the house. The son had never warned the grandfather to look out for toys. The grandfather brought an action against his son to recover for his injuries, and both the grandfather and the son have moved for directed verdicts as to liability. The jurisdiction has abolished intra-family immunity and applies the traditional rules of landowner liability. What action should the court take?\nA. Deny both motions and submit the case to the jury based on negligence.\nB. Deny both motions and submit the case to the jury based on strict liability.\nC. Grant the grandfather's motion, because the son is liable as a matter of law for failing to warn about the risk of toys being left on the floor.\nD. Grant the son's motion, because the son had no duty to warn that the grandson might leave toys on the floor.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:12.254967+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 379, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.173", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "D", "picked": null, "sampled": "A", "options": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:12.255010+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 380, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.227", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "While on a hiking trip during the late fall, the plaintiff arrived, toward the of the day, at a clearing where several similar cabins were located, none of which was occupied. One of the cabins belonged to the plaintiff's friend, who had given the plaintiff permission to use it. The plaintiff entered one of the cabins, which she thought was her friend's, and prepared to spend the night. In fact, the cabin was owned, not by her friend, but by the defendant. When the night turned cold, the plaintiff started a fire in the stove. Unknown to the plaintiff, there was a defect in the stove that allowed carbon monoxide to escape into the cabin. During the night the fumes caused serious injury to the plaintiff. If the plaintiff asserts a claim against the defendant for her injury, will she recover?\nA. Yes, because the defendant knew that the stove was defective.\nB. Yes, because the defendant could have discovered the defect in the stove by a reasonable inspection.\nC. No, because the defendant had no reason to anticipate the plaintiff's presence in the cabin.\nD. No, unless the plaintiff needed to use the cabin for her own protection.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:12.276259+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 381, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.227", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "C", "picked": null, "sampled": "B", "options": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:12.276298+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 382, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.36", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A man's father died in a hospital. The hospital maintains a morgue with refrigerated drawers a bit larger than the human body. The decedent's body was placed in such a drawer awaiting pickup by a mortician. Before the mortician called for the body, a hospital orderly placed two opaque plastic bags in the drawer with the decedent's body. One bag contained the decedent's personal effects, and the other contained an amputated leg from some other hospital patient. It is stipulated that the hospital was negligent to allow the amputated leg to get into the decedent's drawer. The mortician delivered the two opaque plastic bags to the man, assuming both contained personal effects. The man was shocked when he opened the bag containing the amputated leg. The man sued the hospital to recover for emotional distress. At the trial, the man testified that the experience had been extremely upsetting, that he had had recurring nightmares about it, and that his family and business relationships had been adversely affected for a period of several months. He did not seek medical or psychiatric treatment for his emotional distress. Who should prevail?\nA. The man, because of the sensitivity people have regarding the care of the bodies of deceased relatives.\nB. The man, because hospitals are strictly liable for mishandling dead bodies.\nC. the hospital, because the man did not require medical or psychiatric treatment.\nD. the hospital, because the man suffered no bodily harm.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:12.277573+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 383, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.36", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "A", "picked": "A", "sampled": "A", "options": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:12.277608+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 384, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.183", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A manufacturer entered into a five-year contract with a distributor to supply the distributor with products to be distributed in State A. The manufacturer reserved the right to enter into additional such contracts with other State A distributors. The manufacturer knew that the distributor would, on the basis of the agreement, invest in an expansion of its distribution centers in State A in order to handle the distribution of the manufacturer's products to retail sellers in that state. At the time the manufacturer entered into the contract, it had already firmly decided to withdraw from the State A market in two years. Because the distributor had heard rumors of such a plan, its chief executive officer, before signing the contract, asked a representative of the manufacturer whether such a plan was in place. The representative denied the existence of any such plan. Two years into the contract, the manufacturer announced that it no longer intended to sell products in State A and canceled its contract with the distributor. The manufacturer did not thereafter supply products for distribution or sale in State A. Does the distributor have a viable fraud claim against the manufacturer?\nA. No, because the distributor's exclusive remedy is for breach of contract.\nB. No, because the manufacturer did not misstate any material facts when entering into the contract.\nC. Yes, because the manufacturer denied that it had a withdrawal plan when the distributor asked about it at the time the contract was formed.\nD. Yes, because the manufacturer reserved the right to do business with other State A distributors.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:12.315274+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 385, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.183", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "C", "picked": "C", "sampled": "C", "options": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:12.315311+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 386, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.318", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A city has an ordinance that makes it an offense, punishable by fine, for the owner of a dog to permit the dog to run unleashed on a public way. A police officer observed a small dog running loose in the street. As he picked the dog up, the dog's owner, who was seated in her car lawfully parked on the curb, called out, \"Oh, thank you Officer for returning Fido. \" The police officer asked the owner whether the dog was hers, and when she acknowledged ownership, he asked to see her driver's license. The owner gave her name and address, but she refused to produce a driver's license. The police officer then told her that if she didn't produce her driver's license then she would go to jail. The owner responded by saying, \"Isn't this ridiculous?\" The police officer took her by the arm and said, \"Let's go. You are under arrest. \"The owner cried out that the police officer was hurting her but he refused to release her arm, so she struck him with her free hand. The police officer then dragged the owner from her car, forced her into his squad car, and took her to the police station. The incident took place on the street in front of the apartment where the owner and her aged father lived. The police officer did not know that the father had observed what took place from a window in the apartment. If the owner's father asserts a claim against the police officer for intentional infliction of emotional distress, will he prevail?\nA. Yes, because the police officer's acts caused the father severe emotional distress.\nB. Yes, because the police officer's behavior was extreme and outrageous with respect to the dog owner.\nC. No, because the police officer did not know that the father was watching.\nD. No, because the father was not within the zone of physical danger.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:12.529265+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 387, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.318", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "C", "picked": null, "sampled": "B", "options": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:12.529328+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 388, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.41", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A woman worked as a secretary in an office in a building occupied partly by her employer and partly by a retail store. The two areas were separated by walls and were in no way connected, except that the air conditioning unit served both areas and there was a common return-air duct. The retail store began remodeling, and its employees did the work, which included affixing a plastic surfacing material to counters. To fasten the plastic to the counters, the employees purchased glue that was made and packaged in a sealed container by the manufacturer and retailed by a paint company. In the course of the remodeling job, one of the retail store's employees turned on the air conditioning and caused fumes from the glue to travel from the retail store through the air conditioning unit and into the woman's office. The employees did not know that there was common duct work for the air conditioners. The woman was permanently blinded by the fumes from the glue. The label on the container of glue read, \"DANGER. Do not smoke near this product. Extremely flammable. Contains Butanone, Tuluol and Hexane. Use with adequate ventilation. Keep out of the reach of children. \" The three chemicals listed on the label are very toxic and harmful to human eyes. The retail store had received no reports of eye injuries during the 10 years that the product had been manufactured and sold. If the woman asserts a claim against the paint company, the most likely result is that she will\nA. recover, because she can recover against the glue manufacturer.\nB. recover, because the woman was an invitee of a tenant in the building.\nC. not recover, because the paint company was not negligent.\nD. not recover, because the glue came in a sealed package.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:12.654914+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 389, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.41", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "A", "picked": "A", "sampled": "A", "options": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:12.654961+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 390, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.209", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A landlord owns and operates a 12-story apartment building containing 72 apartments, 70 of which are rented. A pedestrian has brought an action against the landlord alleging that while he was walking along a public sidewalk adjacent to the landlord's apartment building a flower pot fell from above and struck him on the shoulder, causing extensive injuries. The action was to recover damages for those injuries. If the pedestrian proves the foregoing facts and offers no other evidence explaining the accident, will his claim survive a motion for directed verdict offered by the defense?\nA. Yes, because the pedestrian was injured by an artificial condition of the premises while using an adjacent public way.\nB. Yes, because such an accident does not ordinarily happen in the absence of negligence.\nC. No, because the landlord is in no better position than the pedestrian to explain the accident.\nD. No, because there is no basis for a reasonable inference that the landlord was negligent.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:12.727283+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 391, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.209", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "D", "picked": "D", "sampled": "D", "options": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:12.727323+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 392, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.163", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A professor, in a lecture in her psychology course at a private university, described an experiment in which a group of college students in a neighboring city rushed out and washed cars stopped at traffic lights during rush hour. She described how people reacted differently - with shock, joy, and surprise. At the conclusion of her report, she said, \"You understand, of course, that you are not to undertake this or any other experiment unless you first clear it with me. \" Four of the professor's students decided to try the same experiment but did not clear it with the professor. One subject of their experiment said, \"I was shocked. There were two people on each side of the car. At first I thought negatively. I thought they were going to attack me and thought of driving away. Then I quieted down and decided there were too many dirty cars in the city anyway. \"Charitable immunity has been abolished in the jurisdiction. If the subject asserts a claim against the students who washed his car, what is his best theory?\nA. Assault.\nB. Negligence.\nC. Invasion of privacy.\nD. False imprisonment.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:12.730209+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 393, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.163", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "A", "picked": null, "sampled": "B", "options": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:12.730245+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 394, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.323", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "Upon the recommendation of her child's pediatrician, a mother purchased a vaporizer for her child, who had been suffering from respiratory congestion. The vaporizer consisted of a gallon-size glass jar, which held water to be heated until it became steam, and a metal heating unit into which the jar fit. The jar was covered by a plastic cap with an opening to allow the steam to escape. At the time the vaporizer was manufactured and sold, there was no safer alternative design. The booklet that accompanied the vaporizer read: \"This product is safe, spillproof, and practically foolproof. It shuts off automatically when the water is gone. \" The booklet had a picture of a vaporizer sending steam over a baby's crib. The mother used the vaporizer whenever the child was suffering from congestion. She placed the vaporizer on the floor near the child's bed. One night, the child got out of bed to get a drink of water and tripped over the cord of the vaporizer as she crossed the room. The top of the vaporizer separated from the base, and boiling water from the jar spilled on the child when the vaporizer tipped over. The child suffered serious burns as a consequence. The child's representative brought an action for damages against the manufacturer of the vaporizer. The manufacturer moved to dismiss after the representative presented the evidence above. Should the manufacturer's motion be granted?\nA. No, because a jury could find that the manufacturer expressly represented that the vaporizer was spillproof.\nB. No, because the vaporizer caused a serious injury to the child.\nC. Yes, because it should have been obvious to the mother that the water in the jar would become boiling hot.\nD. Yes, because there was no safer alternative design.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:12.815634+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 395, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.323", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "A", "picked": "A", "sampled": "A", "options": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:12.815667+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 396, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.85", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "As a shopper was leaving a supermarket, an automatic door that should have opened outward opened inward, striking and breaking the shopper's nose. The owner of the building had installed the automatic door. The lease, pursuant to which the supermarket occupied the building, provided that the supermarket was responsible for all maintenance of the premises. The shopper sued the supermarket. At trial, neither the shopper nor the supermarket offered any testimony, expert or otherwise, as to why the door had opened inward. At the close of evidence, both the shopper and the supermarket moved for judgment as a matter of law. How should the trial judge rule?\nA. Grant judgment for the shopper, because it is undisputed that the door malfunctioned.\nB. Grant judgment for the supermarket, because the shopper failed to join the owner of the building as a defendant.\nC. Grant judgment for the supermarket, because the shopper failed to offer proof of the supermarket's negligence.\nD. Submit the case to the jury, because on these facts negligence may be inferred.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:12.978544+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 397, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.85", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "D", "picked": null, "sampled": "C", "options": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:12.978586+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 398, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.89", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A plaintiff suffered from a serious, though not immediately life-threatening impairment of his circulatory system. The plaintiff's cardiologist recommended a cardiac bypass operation and referred the plaintiff to a surgeon. The surgeon did not inform the plaintiff of the 2% risk of death associated with this operation. The surgeon defended his decision not to mention the risk statistics to the plaintiff because the plaintiff \"was a worrier and it would significantly lessen his chance of survival to be worried about the nonsurvival rate. \"The surgeon successfully performed the bypass operation and the plaintiff made a good recovery. However, when the plaintiff learned of the 2% risk of death associated with the operation, he was furious that the surgeon had failed to disclose this information to him, saying that he would have refused the operation if he had known of the risk. If the plaintiff asserts a claim against the surgeon based on negligence, will the plaintiff prevail?\nA. No, because the surgeon used his best personal judgment in shielding the plaintiff from the risk statistic.\nB. No, because the operation was successful and the plaintiff suffered no harm.\nC. Yes, because the plaintiff would have refused the operation had he been informed of the risk.\nD. Yes, because a patient must be told the risk factors associated with a surgical procedure in order to give informed consent.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:13.035440+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 399, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.89", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "B", "picked": null, "sampled": "D", "options": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:13.035483+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 400, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.242", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "The defendant operates a collection agency. He was trying to collect a valid $400 bill for medical services rendered to the plaintiff by a doctor that was past due. The defendant went to the plaintiff's house and when the plaintiff's mother answered the door, the defendant told her that he was there to collect a bill owed by the plaintiff. The mother told the defendant that because of the plaintiff's illness, the plaintiff had been unemployed for six months, that she was still ill and unable to work, and that she would pay the bill as soon as she could. The defendant, in a loud voice, demanded to see the plaintiff and said that if he did not receive payment immediately, he would file a criminal complaint charging her with fraud. The plaintiff, hearing the conversation, came to the door. The defendant, in a loud voice, repeated his demand for immediate payment and his threat to use criminal process. Assume that the plaintiff did not suffer physical harm as a result of the defendant's conduct, but did suffer severe emotional distress. If the plaintiff asserts a claim against the defendant based on intentional infliction of emotional distress, will the plaintiff prevail?\nA. Yes, because the plaintiff suffered severe emotional distress as a result of the defendant's conduct.\nB. No, because the bill for medical services was valid and past due.\nC. No, because the plaintiff did not suffer physical harm as a result of the defendant's conduct.\nD. No, because the defendant's conduct created almost no risk of physical harm to the plaintiff.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:13.039910+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 401, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.242", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "A", "picked": "A", "sampled": "A", "options": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:13.039946+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 402, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.143", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A husband and a wife, walking on a country road, were frightened by a bull running loose on the road. They climbed over a fence to get onto the adjacent property, owned by the neighbor. After climbing over the fence, the husband and wife damaged some of the neighbor's plants which were near the fence. The fence was posted with a large sign, \"No Trespassing. \"The neighbor saw the husband and the wife and came toward them with his large watchdog on a long leash. The dog rushed at the wife. The neighbor had intended only to frighten the husband and the wife, but the leash broke, and before the neighbor could restrain the dog, the dog bit the wife. If the neighbor asserts a claim against the wife and the husband for damage to his plants, will he prevail?\nA. Yes, because the wife and the husband entered on his land without permission.\nB. Yes, because the neighbor had posted his property with a \"No Trespassing\" sign.\nC. No, because the wife and the husband were confronted by an emergency situation.\nD. No, because the neighbor used excessive force toward the wife and the husband.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:13.041589+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 403, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.143", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "A", "picked": null, "sampled": "C", "options": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:13.041620+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 404, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.106", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A pedestrian started north across the street in a clearly marked north-south crosswalk with the green traffic light in her favor. The pedestrian was in a hurry, and so before reaching the north curb on the street, she cut to her left diagonally across the street to the east-west crosswalk and started across it. Just after reaching the east-west crosswalk, the traffic light turned green in her favor. She proceeded about five steps further across the street to the west in the crosswalk when she was struck by a car approaching from her right that she thought would stop, but did not. The car was driven by a driver, 81 years of age, who failed to stop his car after seeing that the traffic light was red against him. The pedestrian had a bone disease, resulting in very brittle bones, that is prevalent in only 0. 02 percent of the population. As a result of the impact the pedestrian suffered a broken leg and the destruction of her family heirloom, a Picasso original painting that she was taking to her bank for safekeeping. The painting had been purchased by the pedestrian's grandmother for $750 but was valued at $500,000 at the time of the accident. A pedestrian has filed suit against the driver. The driver's attorney has alleged that the pedestrian violated a state statute requiring that pedestrians stay in crosswalks, and that if the pedestrian had not violated the statute she would have had to walk 25 feet more to reach the impact point and therefore would not have been at a place where she could have been hit by the driver. The pedestrian's attorney ascertains that there is a statute as alleged by the driver, that his measurements are correct, that there is a state statute requiring observance of traffic lights, and that the driver's license expired two years prior to the collision. The failure of the driver to have a valid driver's license has which of the following effects?\nA. It makes the driver liable to the pedestrian because the driver is a trespasser on the highway.\nB. It would not furnish a basis for liability.\nC. It proves that the driver is an unfit driver in this instance.\nD. It makes the driver absolutely liable for the pedestrian's injury.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:13.050396+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 405, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.106", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "B", "picked": "B", "sampled": "B", "options": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:13.050450+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 406, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.283", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A homeowner owns a house in a city. On the lawn in front of his home and within five feet of the public sidewalk there was a large tree. The roots of the tree caused the sidewalk to buckle severely and become dangerous. An ordinance of the city requires adjacent landowners to keep sidewalks in a safe condition. The homeowner engaged a contractor to repair the sidewalk, leaving it to the contractor to decide how the repair should be made. The contractor dug up the sidewalk, cut back the roots of the tree, and laid a new sidewalk. Two days after the homeowner had paid the contractor the agreed price of the repair, the tree fell over onto the street and damaged a parked car belonging to a driver. The driver has asserted claims against the homeowner and the contractor, and both defendants admit that cutting the roots caused the tree to fall. In the claim of the driver against the contractor, the best defense of the contractor is that\nA. the tree was on the property of the homeowner.\nB. he repaired the sidewalk at the direction of the homeowner.\nC. he could not reasonably foresee that the tree would fall.\nD. he was relieved of liability when the homeowner paid for the repair.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:13.270335+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 407, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.283", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "C", "picked": "C", "sampled": "C", "options": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:13.270378+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 408, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.120", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A manufacturing plant emitted a faint noise even though the owner had installed state-of-the-art sound dampeners. The plant operated only on weekdays and only during daylight hours. A homeowner who lived near the plant worked a night shift and could not sleep when he arrived home because of the noise from the plant. The other residents in the area did not notice the noise. Does the homeowner have a viable nuisance claim against the owner of the plant?\nA. No, because the homeowner is unusually sensitive to noise during the day.\nB. No, because the plant operates only during the day.\nC. Yes, because the noise is heard beyond the boundaries of the plant.\nD. Yes, because the operation of the plant interferes with the homeowner's quiet use and enjoyment of his property.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:13.404384+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 409, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.120", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "A", "picked": null, "sampled": "D", "options": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:13.404422+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 410, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.67", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "An unmarried woman was prominent in the women's liberation movement. She recently gave birth to a baby and publicly announced that she had no intention of marrying the father or disclosing his identity. The local newspaper decided to do a series of articles on the woman. The first article discussed the woman's parents. The article correctly stated that her mother had died recently and her father is still living. The article referred to the fact that at the time of the woman's birth there were rumors that she had been born six months after her parent's marriage, that her father was not in fact her father, and that an actor was her real father. The actor has lived in retirement for the last 10 years. If the woman asserts a claim based on invasion of privacy against the newspaper for the statements in the first article about her birth and it is established that the statements are true, the most likely result is that the woman will\nA. not prevail, because truth is a complete defense.\nB. not prevail, because of her announcement concerning the birth of her own child.\nC. prevail, because the statements hold her up to ridicule and contempt.\nD. prevail, because her statements are embarrassing to her.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:13.474059+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 411, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.67", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "B", "picked": null, "sampled": "A", "options": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:13.474107+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 412, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.82", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A neighbor, who lived next door to a homeowner, went into the homeowner's garage without permission and borrowed the homeowner's chainsaw. The neighbor used the saw to clear broken branches from the trees on the neighbor's own property. After he had finished, the neighbor noticed several broken branches on the homeowner's trees that were in danger of falling on the homeowner's roof. While the neighbor was cutting the homeowner's branches, the saw broke. In a suit for conversion by the homeowner against the neighbor, will the homeowner recover?\nA. Yes, for the actual damage to the saw.\nB. Yes, for the value of the saw before the neighbor borrowed it.\nC. No, because when the saw broke the neighbor was using it to benefit the homeowner.\nD. No, because the neighbor did not intend to keep the saw.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:13.516097+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 413, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.82", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "B", "picked": null, "sampled": "A", "options": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:13.516147+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 414, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.7", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A man's car sustained moderate damage in a collision with a car driven by a woman. The accident was caused solely by the woman's negligence. The man's car was still drivable after the accident. Examining the car the next morning, the man could see that a rear fender had to be replaced. He also noticed that gasoline had dripped onto the garage floor. The collision had caused a small leak in the gasoline tank. The man then took the car to a mechanic, who owns and operates a body shop, and arranged with the mechanic to repair the damage. During their discussion the man neglected to mention the gasoline leakage. Thereafter, while the mechanic was loosening some of the damaged material with a hammer, he caused a spark, igniting vapor and gasoline that had leaked from the fuel tank. The mechanic was severely burned. The mechanic has brought an action to recover damages against the man and woman. The jurisdiction has adopted a pure comparative negligence rule in place of the traditional common law rule of contributory negligence. In this action, will the mechanic obtain a judgment against the woman?\nA. No, because there is no evidence that the woman was aware of the gasoline leak.\nB. No, because the mechanic would not have been harmed had the man warned him about the gasoline tank.\nC. Yes, because the mechanic was not negligent in failing to discover the gasoline leak himself.\nD. Yes, because the mechanic's injury was a proximate consequence of the woman's negligent driving.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:13.552140+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 415, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.7", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "D", "picked": "D", "sampled": "D", "options": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:13.552205+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 416, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.276", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A storekeeper who owns a large hardware store sells power saws for both personal and commercial use. He often takes old power saws as trade-ins on new ones. The old power saws are then completely disassembled and rebuilt with new bearings by the storekeeper's employees and sold by the storekeeper as \"reconditioned saws. \"A purchaser, the owner and operator of a cabinet-making shop, informed the storekeeper that he wanted to buy a reconditioned circular saw for use in his cabinet making business. However, the blade that was on the saw he picked out had very coarse teeth for cutting rough lumber. The purchaser told the storekeeper that he wanted a saw blade that would cut plywood. The storekeeper exchanged the coarse blade for a new one with finer teeth that would cut plywood smoothly. The new blade was manufactured by Saw-Blade Company, which uses all available techniques to inspect its products for defects. The reconditioned saw had been manufactured by Power Saw Company. The week after the saw was purchased, an employee who works for the purchaser in the purchaser's cabinet-making shop was injured while using the saw. The employee's arm was severely cut. As a result, the cabinetmaking shop was shut down for a week until a replacement for the employee could be found. The employee was injured while cutting plywood when the shaft holding the saw blade came loose because a bearing gave way, and the shaft and blade flew off the saw. The employee was not aware that the shaft was coming loose. If the employee asserts a claim based on strict liability in tort against the storekeeper, the employee probably will\nA. not recover because the purchaser did not tell the storekeeper that the employee would use the power saw.\nB. not recover because employee failed to notice that the shaft was coming loose.\nC. recover because the employee did not know that the shaft was coming loose.\nD. not recover because the storekeeper used all possible care in reconditioning the power saw.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:13.676173+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 417, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.276", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "C", "picked": null, "sampled": "D", "options": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:13.676213+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 418, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.298", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A gas company owns a storage facility where flammable gases are stored in liquified form under high pressure in large spherical tanks. The facility was constructed for the gas company by a construction company that specializes in the construction of such facilities. After the facility had been in use for five years, an explosion in the facility started a large fire that blanketed the surrounding countryside with a high concentration of oily smoke and soot. A farmer owns a large lettuce farm near the facility. His entire lettuce crop was destroyed by oil deposits left by the smoke. A neighbor, who lives near the facility, inhaled a large amount of the smoke and thereafter became obsessed by a fear that the inhalation would destroy his health and ultimately cause his death. If the farmer asserts a claim against the gas company for the loss of his lettuce crop and is unable to show any negligence on the part of the gas company, will the farmer prevail?\nA. Yes, because the operation of the storage facility was an abnormally dangerous activity.\nB. Yes, because the intrusion of the smoke onto the farmer's farm amounted to a trespass.\nC. No, because the explosion was most likely caused by internal corrosion that reasonable inspection procedures would not have disclosed.\nD. No, because the explosion could have been caused by negligent construction on the construction company's part.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:13.765187+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 419, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.298", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "A", "picked": "A", "sampled": "A", "options": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:13.765236+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 420, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.228", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "The plaintiff, a jockey, was seriously injured in a race when another jockey, the defendant, cut too sharply in front of her without adequate clearance. The two horses collided, causing the plaintiff to fall to the ground, sustaining injury. The State Racetrack Commission ruled that, by cutting in too sharply, the defendant committed a foul in violation of racetrack rules requiring adequate clearance for crossing lanes. The plaintiff has brought an action against the defendant for damages in which one count is based on battery. Will the plaintiff prevail on the battery claim?\nA. Yes, if the defendant was reckless in cutting across in front of the plaintiff's horse.\nB. Yes, because the State Racetrack Commission determined that the defendant committed a foul in violation of rules applicable to racing.\nC. No, unless the defendant intended to cause impermissible contact between the two horses or apprehension of such contact by the plaintiff.\nD. No, because the plaintiff assumed the risk of accidental injury inherent in riding as a jockey in a horse race.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:13.789174+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 421, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.228", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "C", "picked": "C", "sampled": "C", "options": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:13.789244+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 422, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.177", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A company operates a factory that requires the use of very high voltage electricity. A neighbor owns property adjacent to the factory where he has attempted to carry on a business that requires the use of sensitive electronic equipment. Occasionally, the effectiveness of the neighbor's electronic equipment is slightly impaired by electrical interference arising from the high voltage currents used in the company's factory. The neighbor has complained to the company several times, with no result. There is no way that the company, by taking reasonable precautions, can avoid the interference with the neighbor's operation that arises from the high voltage currents necessary to the company's operation. In the neighbor's action against the company to recover damages for the economic loss caused to him by the electrical interference, will the neighbor prevail?\nA. Yes, because the company's activity is abnormally dangerous.\nB. Yes, for loss suffered by the neighbor after the company was made aware of the harm its activity was causing to the neighbor.\nC. No, because the company did not cause a substantial and unreasonable interference with the neighbor's business.\nD. No, because the neighbor's harm was purely economic and did not arise from physical harm to his person or property.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:13.795657+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 423, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.177", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "C", "picked": "C", "sampled": "C", "options": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:13.795701+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 424, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.103", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A longshoreman fell to his death through an open hatch on the deck of a ship. The longshoreman was an employee of a company that had contracted with the ship's owner to load and unload the ship. The fall occurred at night, when loading work was over for the day, and there was no reason for the longshoreman to have been near the hatch. A negligence action was filed against the ship's owner for the death of the longshoreman. In that action, the owner has moved for summary judgment and has provided unrebutted evidence that it is customary for the crews of ships to open the hatches for ventilation after the longshoremen have left the ships. How should the court respond to the motion?\nA. Deny the motion and submit the case to the jury with instructions that the custom is relevant but not conclusive on the issue of negligence.\nB. Deny the motion and submit the case to the jury with instructions that the ship's owner should win if the longshoreman was improperly near the hatch.\nC. Deny the motion, because the probability of serious injury caused by falling down an open hatch clearly outweighs the burden of keeping the hatch closed.\nD. Grant the motion, because the custom should be considered conclusive on the issue of negligence.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:13.843103+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 425, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.103", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "A", "picked": "A", "sampled": "A", "options": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:13.843134+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 426, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.243", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A city ordinance makes it unlawful to park a motor vehicle on a city street within 10 feet of a fire hydrant. At 1:55 p. m. a man, realizing he must be in the bank before it closed at 2:00 p. m. , and finding no other space available, parked his automobile in front of a fire hydrant on a city street. The man then hurried into the bank, leaving his aged neighbor as a passenger in the rear seat of the car. About five minutes later, and while the man was still in the bank, a driver was driving down the street. The driver swerved to avoid what he mistakenly thought was a hole in the street and sideswiped the man's car. The man's car was turned over on top of the hydrant, breaking the hydrant and causing a small flood of water. The man's car was severely damaged and the neighbor was badly injured. There is no applicable guest statute. If the city asserts a claim against the driver for the damage to the fire hydrant and the driver was negligent in swerving his car, his negligence is\nA. a cause in fact and a legal cause of the city's harm.\nB. a cause in fact, but not a legal cause, of the city's harm because the man parked illegally.\nC. a legal cause, but not a cause in fact, of the city's harm because the man's car struck the hydrant.\nD. neither a legal cause nor a cause in fact of the city's harm.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:14.006348+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 427, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.243", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "A", "picked": "A", "sampled": "A", "options": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:14.006390+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 428, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.239", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A plaintiff sustained personal injuries in a three-vehicle collision caused by the concurrent negligence of all three drivers. In the plaintiff's action for damages against the other two drivers, the jury apportioned the negligence 30% to the plaintiff, 30% to a truck driver, and 40% to a cab driver. The plaintiff's total damages were $100,000. Assume that the state has retained the common-law rule pertaining to contribution and that the state's comparative negligence statute provides for a system of pure comparative negligence but abolishes joint and several liability. If the plaintiff chooses to pursue the claim against the truck driver alone, she will be entitled to collect at most\nA. $70,000 from the truck driver, and then the truck driver will be entitled to collect $40,000 from the cab driver.\nB. $30,000 from the truck driver, and then the truck driver will be entitled to collect $10,000 from the cab driver.\nC. $30,000 from the truck driver, and then the truck driver will be entitled to collect nothing from the cab driver.\nD. nothing from the truck driver, because his percentage of fault is not greater than that of the plaintiff.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:14.147401+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 429, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.239", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "C", "picked": "C", "sampled": "C", "options": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:14.147450+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 430, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.245", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A husband and a wife, walking on a country road, were frightened by a bull running loose on the road. They climbed over a fence to get onto the adjacent property, owned by the neighbor. After climbing over the fence, the husband and wife damaged some of the neighbor's plants which were near the fence. The fence was posted with a large sign, \"No Trespassing. \"The neighbor saw the husband and the wife and came toward them with his large watchdog on a long leash. The dog rushed at the wife. The neighbor had intended only to frighten the husband and the wife, but the leash broke. Both the husband and wife reasonably believed that the dog was going to bite them. Before the neighbor could restrain the dog, the dog managed to only bite the wife. If the husband asserts a claim based on assault against the neighbor, will he prevail?\nA. Yes, because the landowner did not have a privilege to use excessive force.\nB. Yes, because the husband reasonably believed that the dog might bite him.\nC. No, because the dog did not come in contact with him.\nD. No, because the neighbor was trying to protect his property.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:14.222520+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 431, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.245", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "B", "picked": "B", "sampled": "B", "options": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:14.222607+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 432, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.288", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A pedestrian started north across the street in a clearly marked north-south crosswalk with the green traffic light in her favor. The pedestrian was in a hurry, and so before reaching the north curb on the street, she cut to her left diagonally across the street to the east-west crosswalk and started across it. Just after reaching the east-west crosswalk, the traffic light turned green in her favor. She proceeded about five steps further across the street to the west in the crosswalk when she was struck by a car approaching from her right that she thought would stop, but did not. The car was driven by a driver, 81 years of age, who failed to stop his car after seeing that the traffic light was red against him. The pedestrian had a bone disease, resulting in very brittle bones, that is prevalent in only 0. 02 percent of the population. As a result of the impact, the pedestrian suffered a broken leg and the destruction of her family heirloom, a Picasso original painting that she was taking to her bank for safekeeping. The painting had been purchased by the pedestrian's grandmother for $750 but was valued at $500,000 at the time of the accident. The pedestrian has filed suit against the driver. The driver's attorney has alleged that the pedestrian violated a state statute requiring that pedestrians stay in crosswalks, and that if the pedestrian had not violated the statute, she would have had to walk 25 feet more to reach the impact point and therefore would not have been at a place where she could have been hit by the driver. The pedestrian's attorney ascertains that there is a statute as alleged by the driver, that his measurements are correct, that there is a state statute requiring observance of traffic lights, and that the driver's license expired two years prior to the collision. The pedestrian's violation of the crosswalk statute should not be considered by the jury because\nA. there is no dispute in the evidence about factual cause.\nB. as a matter of law the violation of the statute results in liability for all resulting harm.\nC. as a matter of law the driver's conduct was an independent intervening cause.\nD. as a matter of law the injury to the pedestrian was not the result of a risk the statute was designed to protect against.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:14.235655+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 433, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.288", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "D", "picked": "D", "sampled": "D", "options": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:14.235694+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 434, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.21", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A senior and a junior are students in an advanced high school Russian class. During an argument one day in the high school cafeteria, in the presence of other students, the senior, in Russian, accused the junior of taking money from the senior's locker. None of the other students present understood Russian. In a suit by the junior against the senior based on defamation, the junior will\nA. prevail, because the senior's accusation constituted slander per se.\nB. prevail, because the defamatory statement was made in the presence of third persons.\nC. not prevail, because the senior did not make the accusation with knowledge of falsity.\nD. not prevail, because none of the other students understood Russian.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:14.484619+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 435, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.21", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "D", "picked": "D", "sampled": "D", "options": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:14.484660+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 436, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.232", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "During a deer-hunting season open to rifle hunters, a hunter saw a deer in the forest. He shot his rifle at the deer, hoping to hit and kill it. Instead, he hit and injured a hiker. The hunter had not realized that the hiker was there. Does the injured hiker have an actionable battery claim against the hunter?\nA. No, because the hunter did not intend to shoot the hiker.\nB. No, because the hunter did not make direct physical contact with the hiker.\nC. Yes, because the bullet from the hunter's rifle made direct physical contact with the hiker.\nD. Yes, because the hunter intentionally shot the rifle.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:14.530224+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 437, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.232", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "A", "picked": null, "sampled": "C", "options": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:14.530262+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 438, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.309", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "In preparation for a mountain-climbing expedition, a climber purchased the necessary climbing equipment from a retail dealer in sporting goods. A week later, the climber fell from a rock face when a safety device he had purchased from the retail dealer malfunctioned because of a defect in its manufacture. Thereafter, a rescuer was severely injured when he tried to reach and give assistance to the climber on the ledge to which the climber had fallen. The rescuer's injury was not caused by any fault on his own part. If the rescuer brings an action against the retailer to recover damages for his injuries, will the rescuer prevail?\nA. No, because the retailer could not have discovered the defect by a reasonable inspection of the safety device.\nB. No, because the rescuer did not rely on the representation of safety implied from the sale of the safety device by the retailer.\nC. Yes, because the climber was not negligent in failing to test the safety device.\nD. Yes, because injury to a person in the rescuer's position was foreseeable if the safety device failed.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:14.531798+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 439, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.309", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "D", "picked": "D", "sampled": "D", "options": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:14.531844+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 440, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.181", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A hot-air balloon touring company operated near a golf course. The company's property was separated from the golf course by a fence on which the company had posted signs warning people not to enter the property because of the dangers of balloons landing. A golfer on the golf course hit an errant shot onto the company's property, ignored the warning signs, and jumped over the fence to retrieve her golf ball. At about the same time, one of the company's balloons experienced mechanical problems and had to make an emergency landing to avoid crashing. The balloon, which was out of control when it landed, struck the golfer and injured her. The jurisdiction has decided that hot-air ballooning is an abnormally dangerous activity. In an action by the golfer against the company, does the company have any affirmative defenses?\nA. No, because the balloon was out of control when it struck the golfer.\nB. No, because the company was engaged in an abnormally dangerous activity.\nC. Yes, because the balloon landed to avoid crashing.\nD. Yes, because the golfer assumed the risk by coming onto the company's property.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:14.554478+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 441, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.181", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "D", "picked": null, "sampled": "C", "options": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:14.554521+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 442, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.130", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A young woman who attended a rock concert at a nightclub was injured when the band opened its performance with illegal fireworks that ignited foam insulation in the club's ceiling and walls. The young woman sued the radio station that sponsored the performance. The radio station has moved for summary judgment, claiming that it owed no duty to audience members. The evidence has established the following facts: The station advertised its sponsorship on the radio and in print, distributed free tickets to the concert, staffed the event with the station's interns to assist with crowd control, and provided a station disc jockey to serve as master of ceremonies. The master of ceremonies had the authority to stop or delay the performance at any time on the basis of any safety concern. The station knew or should have known that the band routinely used unlicensed, illegal fireworks in its performances. Should the court grant the radio station's motion for summary judgment?\nA. No, because there is sufficient evidence of knowledge and control on the part of the station to impose on it a duty of care to audience members.\nB. No, because under respondeat superior, the radio station is vicariously liable for the negligent actions of the band.\nC. Yes, because it is the band and the nightclub owners who owed audience members a duty of care.\nD. Yes, because the conduct of the band in setting off illegal fireworks was criminal and was a superseding cause as a matter of law.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:14.575318+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 443, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.130", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "A", "picked": "A", "sampled": "A", "options": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:14.575355+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 444, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.279", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A bicycle company manufactured a bicycle that was sold to a retail bicycle dealer which in turn sold it to a bicyclist. Shortly thereafter, while the bicyclist was riding the bicycle along a city street, he saw a traffic light facing him turn from green to yellow. He sped up, hoping to cross the intersection before the light turned red. However, the bicyclist quickly realized that he could not do so and applied the brake, which failed. To avoid the traffic that was then crossing in front of him, the bicyclist turned sharply to his right and onto the sidewalk, where he struck a pedestrian. Both the pedestrian and the bicyclist sustained injuries. Assume that it is found that the brake failure resulted from a manufacturing defect in the bicycle, and that the defect would have been discovered by a reasonable inspection of the bicycle. If the pedestrian asserts a claim based on negligence against the bicycle company, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the bicycle company placed a defective bicycle into the stream of commerce.\nB. Yes, because the defect could have been discovered through the exercise of reasonable care by the bicycle company.\nC. No, because the pedestrian was not a purchaser of the bicycle.\nD. No, because the bicyclist was negligent in turning into the sidewalk.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:14.752583+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 445, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.279", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "B", "picked": null, "sampled": "A", "options": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:14.752650+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 446, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.158", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A driver was driving his car near a homeowner's house when the homeowner's child darted into the street in front of the driver's car. As the driver swerved and braked his car to avoid hitting the child, the car skidded up into the homeowner's driveway and stopped just short of the homeowner, who was standing in the driveway and had witnessed the entire incident. The homeowner suffered from serious emotional distress from witnessing the danger to his child and to himself. Neither the homeowner nor his property was physically harmed. If the homeowner asserts a claim for damages against the driver but is unable to establish that the driver was negligent, will the homeowner still be able to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the driver's entry onto the homeowner's land was unauthorized.\nB. Yes, because the homeowner suffered serious emotional distress by witnessing the danger to his child and to himself.\nC. No, because the homeowner failed to show that the driver was negligent.\nD. No, because the homeowner's child was not exercising reasonable care.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:14.938850+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 447, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.158", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "C", "picked": "C", "sampled": "C", "options": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:14.938909+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 448, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.319", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A pedestrian was injured when hit by a chair that was thrown from an upper-story hotel window. The pedestrian sued the occupants of all the rooms from which the chair might have been thrown. At trial, the pedestrian has been unable to offer any evidence as to the exact room from which the chair was thrown. The defendants have filed a motion for a directed verdict. Should the court grant the motion?\nA. No, because it is unreasonable to expect the pedestrian to prove which of the defendants caused the harm.\nB. No, because of the doctrine of alternative liability.\nC. Yes, because a plaintiff always has the burden to prove that a particular defendant's conduct was the factual cause of the plaintiff's physical harm.\nD. Yes, because the pedestrian has failed to offer evidence that the defendants jointly engaged in tortious conduct.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:14.961325+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 449, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.319", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "D", "picked": "D", "sampled": "D", "options": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:14.961408+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 450, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.27", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A free-lance photographer took a picture of an athlete in front of a shoe store. The athlete was a nationally known amateur basketball star who had received much publicity in the press. At the time, the window display in the shoe store featured \"Jumpers,\" a well-known make of basketball shoes. The photographer sold the picture, greatly enlarged, to the shoe store and told the shoe store that the photographer had the athlete's approval to do so and that the athlete had consented to the shoe store's showing the enlarged picture in the window. The shoe store made no effort to ascertain whether the athlete had given his consent to the photographer. In fact, the athlete did not even know that the photographer had taken the picture. The shoe store put the enlarged picture in the window with the display of \"Jumpers\" shoes. The college that the athlete attended believed that the athlete had intentionallyorsed the shoe store and \"Jumpers\" shoes, and subsequently canceled his athletic scholarship. If the athlete asserts a claim based on invasion of privacy against the shoe store, will he prevail?\nA. Yes, because the photographer had no right to take the athlete's picture.\nB. Yes, because the shoe store, without the athlete's permission, used the athlete's picture for profit.\nC. No, because the athlete was already a basketball star who had received much publicity in the press.\nD. No, because the shoe store believed it had permission to put the picture in the window.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:14.987232+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 451, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.27", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "B", "picked": "B", "sampled": "B", "options": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:14.987276+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 452, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.162", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "After her husband died in a hospital, a widow directed the hospital to send her husband's body to a funeral home for burial. The hospital negligently misidentified the husband's body and sent it to be cremated. When she was informed of the hospital's mistake, the widow suffered serious emotional distress. She has sued the hospital. Is the hospital likely to be held liable to the widow?\nA. No, because the widow did not witness the cremation.\nB. No, because the widow was never in any danger of bodily harm.\nC. Yes, because hospitals are strictly liable if they do not properly dispose of corpses.\nD. Yes, because the negligent handling of the husband's body was especially likely to cause his widow serious emotional distress.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:15.288036+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 453, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.162", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "D", "picked": "D", "sampled": "D", "options": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:15.288124+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 454, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.296", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A professional football player signed a written consent for his team's physician to perform a knee operation. After the athlete was under a general anesthetic, the doctor asked a world famous orthopedic surgeon to perform the operation. The surgeon's skills were superior to the doctor's, and the operation was successful. In an action for battery by the athlete against the surgeon, the athlete will\nA. prevail, because the athlete did not agree to allow the surgeon to perform the operation.\nB. prevail, because the consent form was in writing.\nC. not prevail, because the surgeon's skills were superior to the doctor's.\nD. not prevail, because the operation was successful.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:15.298759+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 455, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.296", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "A", "picked": null, "sampled": "D", "options": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:15.298808+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 456, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.107", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A plaintiff owned a large tract of land on the shore of a lake. The defendant lived on a stream that ran along one boundary of the plaintiff's land and into the lake. At some time in the past, a channel had been cut across the plaintiff's land from the stream to the lake at a point some distance from the mouth of the stream. From where the defendant lived, the channel served as a convenient shortcut to the lake. Erroneously believing that the channel was a public waterway, the defendant made frequent trips through the channel in his motorboat. His use of the channel caused no harm to the land through which it passed. Once the defendant learned of the plaintiff's ownership of the channel, he stopped using it as a shortcut. If the plaintiff asserts a claim for damages against the defendant based on trespass, which of the following would be a correct disposition of the case?\nA. Judgment for the plaintiff for nominal damages, because the defendant intentionally used the channel.\nB. Judgment for the defendant, because he did not use the channel after learning of the plaintiff's ownership claim.\nC. Judgment for the defendant, because he caused no harm to the plaintiff's land.\nD. Judgment for the defendant, because when he used the channel he believed it was a public waterway.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:15.331072+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 457, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.107", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "A", "picked": "A", "sampled": "A", "options": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:15.331157+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 458, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.111", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A plaintiff and a defendant were in the habit of playing practical jokes on each other on their respective birthdays. On the plaintiff's birthday, the defendant sent the plaintiff a cake containing an ingredient that he knew had, in the past, made the plaintiff very ill. After the plaintiff had eaten a piece of the cake, he suffered severe stomach pains and had to be taken to the hospital by ambulance. On the way to the hospital, the paramedic, who was driving the ambulance, suffered a heart attack, which caused the ambulance to swerve from the road and hit a tree. As a result of the collision, the plaintiff suffered a broken leg. In a suit by the plaintiff against the defendant to recover damages for the plaintiff's broken leg, the plaintiff will\nA. prevail, because the defendant knew that the cake would be harmful or offensive to the plaintiff.\nB. not prevail, because the paramedic was not negligent.\nC. not prevail, because the defendant could not reasonably be expected to foresee injury to the plaintiff's leg.\nD. not prevail, because the paramedic's heart attack was a superseding cause of the plaintiff's broken leg.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:15.345814+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 459, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.111", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "A", "picked": null, "sampled": "D", "options": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:15.345885+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 460, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.325", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A pedestrian started north across the street in a clearly marked north-south crosswalk with the green traffic light in her favor. The pedestrian was in a hurry, and so before reaching the north curb on the street, she cut to her left diagonally across the street to the east-west crosswalk and started across it. Just after reaching the east-west crosswalk, the traffic light turned green in her favor. She proceeded about five steps further across the street to the west in the crosswalk when she was struck by a car approaching from her right that she thought would stop, but did not. The car was driven by a driver, 81 years of age, who failed to stop his car after seeing that the traffic light was red against him. The pedestrian had a bone disease, resulting in very brittle bones, that is prevalent in only 0. 02 percent of the population. As a result of the impact, the pedestrian suffered a broken leg and the destruction of her family heirloom, a Picasso original painting that she was taking to her bank for safekeeping. The painting had been purchased by the pedestrian's grandmother for $750 but was valued at $500,000 at the time of the accident. The pedestrian has filed suit against the driver. The driver's attorney has alleged that the pedestrian violated a state statute requiring that pedestrians stay in crosswalks, and that if the pedestrian had not violated the statute she would have had to walk 25 feet more to reach the impact point and therefore would not have been at a place where she could have been hit by the driver. The pedestrian's attorney ascertains that there is a statute as alleged by the driver, that his measurements are correct, that there is a state statute requiring observance of traffic lights, and that the driver's license expired two years prior to the collision. If the pedestrian establishes liability on the part of the driver for her physical injuries, should the pedestrian's recovery include damages for a broken leg?\nA. No, since only 0. 02 percent of the population have bones as brittle as the pedestrian's.\nB. No, because a person of ordinary health would probably not have suffered a broken leg from the impact.\nC. Yes, because the driver could foresee that there would be unforeseeable consequences of the impact.\nD. Yes, even though the extent of the injury was not a foreseeable consequence of the impact.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:15.411777+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 461, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.325", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "D", "picked": null, "sampled": "B", "options": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:15.411825+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 462, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.204", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A water pipe burst in the basement of a grocery store, flooding the basement and damaging cases of canned goods on the floor. The plumbing contractor's workmen, in repairing the leak, knocked over several stacks of canned goods in cases, denting the cans. After settling its claims against the landlord for the water leak and against the plumbing contractor for the damage done by his workmen, the grocery store put the goods on special sale. Four weeks later, a customer was shopping in the grocery store. Several tables in the market were covered with assorted canned foods, all of which were dirty and dented. A sign on each of the tables read: \"Damaged Cans - Half Price. \"The customer was having a guest over for dinner that evening and purchased two dented cans of tuna, packed by a canning company, from one of the tables displaying the damaged cans. Before the guest arrived, the customer prepared a tuna casserole which she and the guest later ate. Both became ill, and the medical testimony established that the illness was caused by the tuna's being unfit for consumption. The tuna consumed by the customer and the guest came from the case that was at the top of one of the stacks knocked over by the workmen. The tuna in undamaged cans from the same canning company's shipment was fit for consumption. If the customer asserts a claim against the canning company based on negligence, the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur is\nA. applicable, because the tuna was packed in a sealed can.\nB. applicable, because the canning company, as the packer, is strictly liable.\nC. not applicable, because the case of tuna had been knocked over by the workmen.\nD. not applicable, because of the sign on the table from which the customer purchased the tuna.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:15.420979+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 463, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.204", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "C", "picked": null, "sampled": "D", "options": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:15.421028+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 464, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.90", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A man and his friend, who were both adults, went to a party. The man and the friend had many drinks at the party and became legally intoxicated. They decided to play a game of chance called \"Russian roulette\" using a gun loaded with one bullet. As part of the game, the man pointed the gun at the friend and, on her command, pulled the trigger. The man shot the friend in the shoulder. The friend has brought a negligence action against the man. Traditional defenses based on plaintiff's conduct apply. &nbsp;What is likely to be the dispositive issue in this case?\nA. Whether the game constituted a joint venture.\nB. Whether the friend could validly consent to the game.\nC. Whether the friend was also negligent.\nD. Whether the man was legally intoxicated when he began playing the game.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:15.524016+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 465, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.90", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "C", "picked": null, "sampled": "B", "options": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:15.524098+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 466, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.5", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A hotel employed a carefully selected independent contractor to rebuild its swimming pool. The hotel continued to operate while the pool was being rebuilt. The contract between the hotel and the contractor required the contractor to indemnify the hotel for any liability arising from the contractor's negligent acts. A guest of the hotel fell into the excavation, which the contractor had negligently left unguarded. In an action by the guest against the hotel to recover for his injuries, what would be the most likely outcome?\nA. Liability, because the hotel had a nondelegable duty to the guest to keep a safe premises.\nB. Liability, because the contract between the hotel and the contractor required the contractor to indemnify the hotel for any liability arising from the contractor's negligent acts.\nC. No liability, because the contractor was the actively negligent party.\nD. No liability, because the hotel exercised reasonable care in employing the contractor.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:15.734153+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 467, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.5", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "A", "picked": "A", "sampled": "A", "options": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:15.734196+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 468, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.65", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A driver drove his car into an intersection and collided with a fire engine that had entered the intersection from the driver's right. The accident was caused by negligence on the driver's part. As a result of the accident, the fire engine was delayed in reaching the plaintiff's house, which was entirely consumed by fire. The plaintiff's house was located about 10 blocks from the scene of the accident. If the plaintiff asserts a claim against the driver, the plaintiff will recover\nA. the part of his loss that would have been prevented if the collision had not occurred.\nB. the value of his house before the fire.\nC. nothing, because the driver had nothing to do with causing the fire.\nD. nothing, because the driver's conduct did not create an apparent danger to the plaintiff.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:15.747065+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 469, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.65", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "A", "picked": "A", "sampled": "A", "options": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:15.747103+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 470, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.49", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A construction company was engaged in blasting operations to clear the way for a new road. The company had erected adequate barriers and posted adequate warning signs in the vicinity of the blasting. Although the plaintiff read and understood the signs, he entered the area to walk his dog. As a result of the blasting, the plaintiff was hit by a piece of rock and sustained head injuries. The jurisdiction follows the traditional common law rules governing the defenses of contributory negligence, assumption of risk, and last clear chance. In an action by the plaintiff against the construction company to recover damages for his injuries, the plaintiff will\nA. not prevail, because the construction company exercised reasonable care to protect the public from harm.\nB. not prevail, because the plaintiff understood the signs and disregarded the warnings.\nC. prevail, because the plaintiff was harmed by the construction company's abnormally dangerous activity.\nD. prevail, because the plaintiff used reasonable care to protect himself from harm.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:16.026367+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 471, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.49", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "B", "picked": "B", "sampled": "B", "options": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:16.026425+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 472, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.116", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A nurse, after being notified by her employer, a doctor, that her employment with his office was terminated, applied for a position with a hospital. In her application, the nurse listed her former employment with the doctor. The doctor, in response to a telephone inquiry from the hospital, stated that the nurse \"lacked professional competence. \" Although the doctor reasonably believed that to be a fair assessment of the nurse, his adverse rating was mostly based on an episode of malpractice for which the nurse was blamed, but was actually the fault of another doctor. Because of the doctor's adverse comment on her qualification, the nurse was not employed by the hospital. If the nurse asserts a claim based on defamation against the doctor, will the nurse prevail?\nA. Yes, because the doctor was mistaken in the facts on which he based his opinion of the nurse's competence.\nB. Yes, because the doctor's statement reflected adversely on the nurse' professional competence.\nC. No, because the nurse authorized the hospital to make inquiry of her former employer.\nD. No, because the doctor had reasonable grounds for his belief that the nurse was not competent.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:16.044626+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 473, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.116", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "D", "picked": null, "sampled": "B", "options": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:16.044686+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 474, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.34", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "Section 1 of the Vehicle Code of a state makes it illegal to cross a street in a central business district other than at a designated crosswalk. Section 2 of the Code prohibits parking any motor vehicle so that it blocks any part of a designated crosswalk. A pedestrian wanted to cross Main Street in the central business district of a city, located in the state, but a truck parked by a trucker was blocking the designated crosswalk. The pedestrian stepped out into Main Street and carefully walked around the back of the truck. The pedestrian was struck by a motor vehicle negligently operated by a driver. If the pedestrian asserts a claim against the trucker, the most likely result is that the pedestrian will\nA. prevail, because the trucker's violation of a state statute makes him strictly liable for all injuries caused thereby.\nB. prevail, because the probable purpose of Section 2 of the Vehicle Code of State was to safeguard pedestrians in using the crosswalk.\nC. not prevail, because the pedestrian assumed the risk of injury when he crossed the street outside the crosswalk.\nD. not prevail, because the driver's conduct was the actual cause of the pedestrian's harm.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:16.081437+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 475, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.34", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "B", "picked": null, "sampled": "D", "options": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:16.081483+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 476, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.118", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A fire that started in the defendant's warehouse spread to the plaintiff's adjacent warehouse. The defendant did not intentionally start the fire, and the plaintiff can produce no evidence as to how the fire started. However, the defendant had failed to install a sprinkler system, which was required by a criminal statute. The plaintiff can produce evidence that had the sprinkler system been installed, it could have extinguished the fire before it spread. In an action by the plaintiff against the defendant to recover for the fire damage, is it possible for the plaintiff to prevail?\nA. No, because the statute provides only for criminal penalties.\nB. No, because there is no evidence that the defendant negligently caused the fire to start.\nC. Yes, because a landowner is strictly liable for harm to others caused by the spread of fire from his premises under the doctrine of Rylands v. Fletcher.\nD. Yes, because the plaintiff was harmed as a result of the defendant's violation of a statute that was meant to protect against this type of occurrence.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:16.121604+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 477, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.118", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "D", "picked": "D", "sampled": "D", "options": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:16.121693+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 478, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.2", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A real estate agent and a plumber are identical twins. The real estate agent, upset with a man, said, \"You'd better stay away from me. The next time I see you around here, I'll punch you.\" Two days later, while in the neighborhood, the man saw the plumber approaching him. As the plumber came up to the man, the plumber raised his hand. Thinking he was the real estate agent and reasonably fearing bodily harm, the man struck the plumber. If the plumber asserts a claim against the man and the man relies on the privilege of self-defense, will the man prevail?\nA. No, because the plumber was not an aggressor.\nB. No, because the plumber did not intend his gesture as a threat.\nC. Yes, because the man honestly believed that the plumber would attack him.\nD. Yes, because a reasonable person under the circumstances would have believed that the plumber would attack him.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:16.145585+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 479, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.2", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "D", "picked": null, "sampled": "A", "options": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:16.145649+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 480, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.11", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A wealthy elderly woman was repeatedly harassed by a debt collector over a period of two months. The debt collector was trying to collect a large debt owed to his client by the woman's impoverished adult son. Although the debt collector knew that the woman was not legally responsible for the son's debt, he called the woman multiple times each day and threatened to destroy her credit. He also told her that he knew where she lived and that he was going to withdraw the money from her bank account. As a result, the woman suffered great mental anguish, was unable to sleep, and ultimately suffered serious health consequences. Which of the following conclusions would best support a claim by the woman against the debt collector for intentional infliction of emotional distress?\nA. The debt collector could reasonably have foreseen that the calls and threats might cause harm to the woman's health.\nB. The debt collector's conduct caused the woman to fear that he was someday going to physically attack her.\nC. The debt collector's conduct failed to comply with industry custom.\nD. The debt collector's conduct was extreme and outrageous.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:16.188915+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 481, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.11", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "D", "picked": "D", "sampled": "D", "options": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:16.188974+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 482, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.192", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A defendant operates a bank courier service that uses armored trucks to transport money and securities. One of the defendant's armored trucks was parked illegally, too close to a street intersection. The plaintiff, driving his car at an excessive speed, skidded into the armored truck while trying to make a turn. The truck was not damaged, but the plaintiff was injured. The plaintiff has brought an action against the defendant to recover damages for his loss resulting from the accident. The jury determined that both parties were negligent, but that the defendant was less negligent than the plaintiff. The jurisdiction follows a pure comparative negligence rule. In this action, the plaintiff should recover\nA. nothing, because the defendant was not an active or efficient cause of the plaintiff's loss.\nB. nothing, because the defendant was less negligent.\nC. his entire loss, reduced by a percentage that reflects the negligence attributed to the plaintiff.\nD. his entire loss, because the defendant's truck suffered no damage.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:16.301414+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 483, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.192", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "C", "picked": "C", "sampled": "C", "options": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:16.301453+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 484, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.265", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A construction worker was working at the construction site of a new building. An open elevator, which had been installed in the building by the elevator manufacturer, was used to haul workers and building materials between floors. While the worker was riding the elevator, it stalled between floors due to a manufacturing defect in the elevator. The worker called for assistance and was in no danger, but after waiting 15 minutes for help, he became anxious and jumped 12 feet to get out. He severely injured his back when he landed. In an action by the worker against the elevator manufacturer to recover for his back injury, is the worker likely to obtain a judgment for 100% of his damages?\nA. No, because such risks are inherent in construction work.\nB. No, because the worker was not in danger while on the stalled elevator.\nC. Yes, because the elevator stalled due to a manufacturing defect.\nD. Yes, because the worker was falsely imprisoned in the stalled elevator.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:16.477781+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 485, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.265", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "B", "picked": null, "sampled": "C", "options": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:16.477864+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 486, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.113", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A hiker, although acting with reasonable care, fell while attempting to climb a mountain and lay unconscious and critically injured on a ledge that was difficult to reach. The plaintiff, an experienced mountain climber, was himself seriously injured while trying to rescue the hiker. The plaintiff's rescue attempt failed, and the hiker died of his injuries before he could be reached. The plaintiff brought an action against the hiker's estate for compensation for his injuries. In this jurisdiction, the traditional common-law rules relating to contributory negligence and assumption of risk remain in effect. Will the plaintiff prevail in his action against the hiker's estate?\nA. Yes, because his rescue attempt was reasonable.\nB. Yes, because the law should not discourage attempts to assist persons in helpless peril.\nC. No, because the hiker's peril did not arise from his own failure to exercise reasonable care.\nD. No, because the plaintiff's rescue attempt failed and therefore did not benefit the hiker.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:16.508985+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 487, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.113", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "C", "picked": null, "sampled": "D", "options": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:16.509043+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 488, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.110", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A college student purchased a large bottle of No-Flake dandruff shampoo, manufactured by a shampoo company. The box containing the bottle stated in part: \"CAUTION - Use only one capful at most once a day. Greater use may cause severe damage to the scalp. \" The college student read the writing on the box, removed the bottle, and threw the box away. The college student's roommate asked to use the No-Flake, and the college student said, \"Be careful not to use too much. \" The roommate thereafter used No-Flake twice a day, applying two or three capfuls each time, notwithstanding the label statement that read: \"Use no more than one capful per day. See box instructions. \" The more he used No-Flake, the more inflamed his scalp became, the more it itched, and the more he used. After three weeks of such use, the roommate finally consulted a doctor who diagnosed his problem as a serious and irreversible case of dermatitis caused by excessive exposure to the active ingredients by No-Flake. These ingredients are uniquely effective at controlling dandruff, but there is no way to remove a remote risk to a small percentage of persons who may contract dermatitis as the result of applying, for prolonged periods of time, amounts of No-Flake substantially in excess of the directions. This jurisdiction adheres to the traditional common-law rules pertaining to contributory negligence and assumption of risk. If the roommate asserts a claim against the college student for his dermatitis injuries, the college student's best defense will be that\nA. the roommate was contributorily negligent.\nB. the roommate assumed the risk.\nC. the college student had no duty toward the roommate, who was a gratuitous donee.\nD. the college student had no duty toward the roommate, because the shampoo company created the risk and had a nondelegable duty to foreseeable users.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["A. The college student warned the roommate not to use too much shampoo, so the roommate's failure to follow the instructions on the box and the college student's warning would likely be considered contributory negligence."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:16.596904+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 489, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.110", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "A", "picked": "A", "sampled": "A. The college student warned the roommate not to use too much shampoo, so the roommate's failure to follow the instructions on the box and the college student's warning would likely be considered contributory negligence.", "options": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:16.596950+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 490, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.338", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A woman and a man, who were professional rivals, were attending a computer industry dinner where each was to receive an award for achievement in the field of data processing. The man engaged the woman in conversation away from the rest of the party and expressed the opinion that if they joined forces, they could do even better. The woman replied that she would not consider the man as a business partner and when the man demanded to know why, she told him that he was incompetent. The exchange was overheard by another person who attended the dinner. The man suffered emotional distress but no pecuniary loss. If the man asserts a claim against the woman based on defamation, will the man prevail?\nA. No, because the man suffered no pecuniary loss.\nB. No, because the woman's statement was made to the man and not to the person who overheard the statement.\nC. No, because the woman did not foresee that her statement would be overheard by another person.\nD. No, because the woman did not intend to cause the man emotional distress.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:16.794501+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 491, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.338", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "C", "picked": null, "sampled": "A", "options": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:16.794576+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 492, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.264", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A mother took her five-year-old child to a hospital emergency room for treatment. A doctor on the hospital staff molested the child while treating her. At the time, no one was in the treatment room except the doctor and the child; the mother had left the room to get a cup of coffee. Two weeks later, when the child told her mother what had occurred in the treatment room, the mother suffered severe emotional distress that caused her to become physically ill. In an action against the doctor by the mother on her own behalf to recover for intentional infliction of emotional distress, is the mother likely to prevail?\nA. No, because the mother was contributorily negligent in leaving the child alone with the doctor during treatment.\nB. No, because the mother was neither the direct victim of the doctor's conduct nor a contemporaneous witness.\nC. Yes, because the doctor's conduct was outrageous.\nD. Yes, because the mother's distress was the natural and foreseeable consequence of the doctor's conduct.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:16.817807+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 493, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.264", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "B", "picked": null, "sampled": "D", "options": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:16.817846+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 494, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.123", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "The plaintiff was a passenger in a car that was struck in the rear by a car driven by a student. The collision resulted from the student's negligence in failing to keep a proper lookout. The plaintiff's physician found that the collision had aggravated a mild osteoarthritic condition in her lower back and had brought on similar, but new, symptoms in her neck and upper back. Six months after the first accident, the plaintiff was a passenger in a car that was struck in the rear by a car driven by a doctor. The collision resulted from the doctor's negligence in failing to keep a proper lookout. The plaintiff's physician found that the second collision had caused a general worsening of the plaintiff's condition, marked by a significant restriction of movement and muscle spasms in her back and neck. The physician believes the plaintiff's worsened condition is permanent, and he can find no basis for apportioning responsibility for her present worsened condition between the two automobile collisions. The plaintiff brought an action for damages against the student and the doctor. At the close of the plaintiff's evidence, as outlined above, each of the defendants moved for a directed verdict in his favor on the ground that the plaintiff had failed to produce evidence on which the jury could determine how much damage each defendant had caused. The jurisdiction adheres to the common law rules regarding joint and several liability. The plaintiff's best argument in opposition to the defendants' motions would be that the defendants are jointly and severally liable for the plaintiff's entire harm, because\nA. the wrongdoers, rather than their victim, should bear the burden of the impossibility of apportionment.\nB. the defendants breached a common duty that each of them owed to the plaintiff.\nC. each of the defendants was the proximate cause in fact of all of the plaintiff's damages.\nD. the defendants are joint tortfeasors who aggravated the plaintiff's preexisting condition.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:16.824893+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 495, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.123", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "A", "picked": null, "sampled": "D", "options": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:16.824934+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 496, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.39", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A plaintiff, who was driving at an excessive speed, applied her brakes to stop at a traffic light. Due to damp, fallen leaves, her car skidded and came to a halt perpendicular to the roadway. The defendant, who was also driving at an excessive speed and was immediately behind the plaintiff, saw the plaintiff's car perpendicular to the roadway. Although the defendant had sufficient distance to come to a slow, controlled stop, he decided not to slow down but, rather, to swerve to the left in an effort to go around the plaintiff's car. Due to oncoming traffic, the space was insufficient and the defendant's car collided with the plaintiff's car, severely injuring the plaintiff. The plaintiff filed a personal injury action against the defendant in a jurisdiction in which contributory negligence is a bar to recovery. At trial, the jury finds that the defendant was more at fault than the plaintiff, and that the defendant had a last clear chance to avoid the accident. However, the jury also found that the plaintiff was the legal cause of the accident, and that she assumed the risk by speeding. Will the plaintiff prevail?\nA. Yes, because the defendant was more than 50% at fault.\nB. Yes, because the defendant had the last clear chance.\nC. No, because the plaintiff's conduct was a legal cause of the accident.\nD. No, because, in speeding, the plaintiff assumed the risk.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:16.863012+00:00"}
-{"final_report": {"accuracy": 0.5823529411764706}}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 497, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.39", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "B", "picked": null, "sampled": "D", "options": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:16.896620+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 498, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.139", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A consumer became physically ill after drinking part of a bottle of soda that contained a large decomposed snail. The consumer sued the store from which she had bought the soda to recover damages for her injuries. The parties agreed that the snail had been put into the bottle during the bottling process, over which the store had no control. The parties also agreed that the snail would have been visible in the bottle before the consumer opened it. Will the consumer be likely to prevail in an action against the store?\nA. No, because the consumer could have seen the snail in the bottle before she drank out of it.\nB. No, because the store was not responsible for the bottling process.\nC. Yes, because the consumer was injured by a defective product sold to her by the store.\nD. Yes, because the store had exclusive control over the bottle before selling it to the consumer.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:16.940933+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 499, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.139", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "C", "picked": "C", "sampled": "C", "options": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:16.940971+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 500, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.59", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "Two parents purchased a new mobile home from a seller. The mobile home was manufactured by Mobilco and had a ventilating system designed by Mobilco with both a heating unit and an air conditioner. Mobilco installed a furnace manufactured by Heatco and an air conditioning unit manufactured by Coolco. Each was controlled by an independent thermostat installed by Mobilco. Because of the manner in which Mobilco designed the ventilating system, the first time the ventilating system was operated by the parents, cold air was vented into the parents' bedroom to keep the temperature at 68 degrees F (20 degrees C). The cold air then activated the heater thermostat, and hot air was pumped into the bedroom of the six-month-old child of the parents. The temperature in the child's room reached more than 170 degrees F (77 degrees C) before the child's mother became aware of the condition and shut the system off manually. As a result, the child suffered permanent physical injury. Claims have been asserted by the child, through a duly appointed guardian, against Mobilco, the seller, Heatco, and Coolco. If the child's claim against the seller is based on negligence, the minimum proof necessary to establish the seller's liability is that the ventilating system\nA. was defective.\nB. was defective and had not been inspected by the seller.\nC. was defective and had been inspected by the seller, and the defect was not discovered.\nD. was defective, and the defect would have been discovered if the seller had exercised reasonable care in inspecting the system.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:16.960248+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 501, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.59", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "D", "picked": "D", "sampled": "D", "options": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:16.960286+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 502, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.184", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "When two parents were told that their child should repeat second grade, they sought to have him evaluated by a psychologist. The psychologist, who charged $300, determined that their child had a learning disability. Based upon the report, the school board placed the child in special classes. At an open meeting of the school board, the parents asked that the $300 they had paid to the psychologist be reimbursed by the school district. A reporter attending the meeting wrote a newspaper article about this request, mentioning the child by name. The parents were aware that the reporter was at the meeting. In a privacy action brought by the child's legal representative against the newspaper, the plaintiff will\nA. recover, because the story is not newsworthy.\nB. recover, because the child is under the age of consent.\nC. not recover, because the story is a fair and accurate report of what transpired at the meeting.\nD. not recover, because the parents knew that the reporter was present.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:17.082872+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 503, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.184", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "C", "picked": "C", "sampled": "C", "options": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:17.082921+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 504, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.195", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "As a result of an accident at the NPP nuclear power plant, a quantity of radioactive vapor escaped from the facility and two members of the public were exposed to excessive doses of radiation. According to qualified medical opinion, that exposure will double the chance that these two persons will ultimately develop cancer. However, any cancer that might be caused by this exposure will not be detectable for at least ten years. If the two exposed persons do develop cancer, it will not be possible to determine whether it was caused by this exposure or would have developed in any event. If the exposed persons assert a claim for damages against NPP shortly after the escape of the radiation, which of the following questions will NOT present a substantial issue?\nA. Will the court recognize that the plaintiffs have suffered a present legal injury?\nB. Can the plaintiffs prove the amount of their damages?\nC. Can the plaintiffs prove that any harm they may suffer was caused by this exposure?\nD. Can the plaintiffs prevail without presenting evidence of specific negligence on the part of NPP?\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:17.246781+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 505, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.195", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "D", "picked": "D", "sampled": "D", "options": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:17.246813+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 506, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.290", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A storekeeper who owns a large hardware store sells power saws for both personal and commercial use. He often takes old power saws as trade-ins on new ones. The old power saws are then completely disassembled and rebuilt with new bearings by the storekeeper's employees and sold by the storekeeper as \"reconditioned saws. \"A purchaser, the owner and operator of a cabinet-making shop, informed the storekeeper that he wanted to buy a reconditioned circular saw for use in his cabinet making business. However, the blade that was on the saw he picked out had very coarse teeth for cutting rough lumber. The purchaser told the storekeeper that he wanted a saw blade that would cut plywood. The storekeeper exchanged the coarse blade for a new one with finer teeth that would cut plywood smoothly. The new blade was manufactured by Saw-Blade Company, which uses all available techniques to inspect its products for defects. The reconditioned saw had been manufactured by Power Saw Company. The week after the saw was purchased, an employee, who works for the purchaser in the purchaser's cabinet-making shop, was injured while using the saw. The employee's arm was severely cut. As a result, the cabinetmaking shop was shut down for a week until a replacement for the employee could be found. If the employee was injured while cutting plywood when the shaft holding the saw blade came loose because a bearing gave way, and the shaft and blade flew off the saw, and if the purchaser asserts a claim based on strict liability in tort against the storekeeper for loss of business because of the injury to the employee, the purchaser probably will\nA. not recover, because economic loss from injury to an employee is not within the scope of the storekeeper's duty.\nB. not recover, because the storekeeper was not the manufacturer of the power saw.\nC. recover, because the storekeeper knew the power saw was to be used in the purchaser's cabinetmaking business.\nD. recover, because the reconditioned power saw was the direct cause of the purchaser's loss of business.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:17.286017+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 507, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.290", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "A", "picked": "A", "sampled": "A", "options": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:17.286049+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 508, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.246", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "In an action by a man against a pharmacy, the man offered only the following evidence:The man took a clearly written prescription to a pharmacy. The pharmacy's employee filled the prescription by providing pills with 30 milligrams of the active ingredient instead of 20 milligrams, as was prescribed. Shortly after taking the pills as directed, the man, who had no previous history of heart problems, suffered a heart attack. Overdoses of the active ingredient had previously been associated with heart problems. Does the man have a valid claim against the pharmacy?\nA. No, because pharmacies are not strictly liable for injuries caused by incorrectly filled prescriptions.\nB. No, because the man offered no specific proof as to the pharmacy's negligence.\nC. Yes, because a jury could reasonably conclude that the man would not have suffered a heart attack had the pharmacy provided the correct dosage.\nD. Yes, because by providing the 30-milligram pills rather than the 20-milligram pills, the pharmacy sold the man a defective product.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:17.356224+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 509, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.246", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "C", "picked": "C", "sampled": "C", "options": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:17.356283+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 510, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.253", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "In a trial by jury, a restaurant owner proved that a power company's negligent maintenance of a transformer caused a fire that destroyed his restaurant. The jury returned a verdict for the owner in the amount of $450,000 for property loss and $500,000 for emotional distress. The trial judge entered judgment in those amounts. The power company appealed the part of the judgment awarding $500,000 for emotional distress. On appeal, the judgment should be\nA. affirmed, because the power company negligently caused the owner's emotional distress.\nB. affirmed, because harm arising from emotional distress is as real as harm caused by physical impact.\nC. reversed, because the law does not recognize a claim for emotional distress incident to negligently caused property loss.\nD. reversed, because the owner suffered physical harm as a consequence of the emotional distress caused by his property loss.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:17.582133+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 511, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.253", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "C", "picked": "C", "sampled": "C", "options": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:17.582213+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 512, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.30", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A delivery driver backed her truck up to the loading dock of a large home improvement store. Although it was not her job to unload the truck, the driver would sometimes open the truck's rear doors after parking it in position. On this occasion, when the driver was about to open the rear doors, she observed through the doors' windows that some large boxes appeared to be pressed against the doors. At that point, she sought assistance. Two people who were on the loading dock responded to her request: the store's shipping manager and the manager's adult friend who was a former employee of the store and was visiting to catch up with the manager. The driver and the friend stood back as the manager opened the doors; no boxes fell out. With the doors open, all three observed a nylon rope that ran tightly across some of the boxes near the doors. As the manager began to cut through the rope, the driver, who with the friend remained at a distance, said, \"Are you sure you want to do that?\"A moment later, the friend noticed that the padlock from the truck's rear doors had fallen to the dock floor between him and the truck. Without saying anything to the manager or the driver, the friend took several steps forward to retrieve the lock. At that instant, the manager succeeded in cutting the rope, and the boxes that had been held in place by the rope fell and hit the friend's head, injuring him. The friend has sued the store for negligence. The jurisdiction has a system of modified comparative fault but also recognizes assumption of risk as a distinct and complete defense. Assuming that the store has raised an assumption-of-risk defense and that both sides have filed summary judgment motions based on the facts set out above, how should the trial court rule?\nA. The court should enter judgment as a matter of law for the friend.\nB. The court should deny both motions.\nC. The court should rule that the friend's action fails as a matter of law because he implicitly assumed the risk of the manager's carelessness.\nD. The court should rule that the friend's action fails as a matter of law because no reasonable jury would find him less at fault than the manager.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:17.592782+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 513, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.30", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "B", "picked": null, "sampled": "C", "options": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:17.592886+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 514, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.147", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "The governor of a state signed a death warrant for a convicted murderer. Two protesters are active opponents of the death penalty. At a demonstration protesting the execution of the murderer, the protesters carried large signs that stated, \"The governor - Murderer. \" A television station broadcasted news coverage of the demonstration, including pictures of the signs carried by the protesters. If the governor asserts against the television station a claim of damages for intentional infliction of emotional distress, will the governor prevail?\nA. Yes, because the broadcast showing the signs caused the governor to suffer severe emotional distress.\nB. Yes, because the assertion on the signs was extreme and outrageous.\nC. No, because the governor did not suffer physical harm as a consequence of the emotional distress caused by the signs.\nD. No, because the television station did not publish a false statement of fact with \"actual malice. \"\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:17.600140+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 515, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.147", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "D", "picked": "D", "sampled": "D", "options": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:17.600176+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 516, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.207", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A mother rushed her eight-year-old daughter to the emergency room at a local hospital after the child fell off her bicycle and hit her head on a sharp rock. The wound caused by the fall was extensive and bloody. The mother was permitted to remain in the treatment room, and held the child's hand while the emergency room physician cleaned and sutured the wound. During the procedure, the mother said that she was feeling faint and stood up to leave the room. While leaving the room, the mother fainted and, in falling, struck her head on a metal fixture that protruded from the emergency room wall. She sustained a serious injury as a consequence. If the mother sues the hospital to recover damages for her injury, will she prevail?\nA. Yes, because the mother was a public invitee of the hospital's.\nB. Yes, because the fixture was not an obvious, commonly used, and essential part of the hospital's equipment.\nC. No, because there is no evidence that the hospital's personnel failed to take reasonable steps to anticipate and prevent the mother's injury.\nD. No, because the hospital's personnel owed the mother no affirmative duty of care.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:17.634624+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 517, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.207", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "C", "picked": null, "sampled": "B", "options": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:17.634662+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 518, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.256", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A six-year old boy has a well-deserved reputation for bullying younger and smaller children. His parents have encouraged him to be aggressive and tough. The child, for no reason, knocked down, kicked and severely injured his playmate, a four-year old. A claim for relief has been asserted by the playmate's parents for their medical and hospital costs and for the playmate's injuries. If the claim is asserted against the child's parents, the most likely result is they will be\nA. liable, because parents are strictly liable for the torts of their children.\nB. liable, because the child's parents encouraged him to be aggressive and tough.\nC. not liable, because a six-year old cannot commit a tort.\nD. not liable, because parents cannot be held liable for the tort of a child.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:17.677859+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 519, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.256", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "B", "picked": "B", "sampled": "B", "options": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:17.677898+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 520, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.117", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A farmer owns a large farm on which he allows his friends to hunt during quail-hunting season. He does not provide his friends with any instructions about gun safety. The neighbor who owns property adjacent to the farm knows of the friends' use of the property during the hunting season. One day during the hunting season, without the farmer's knowledge or permission, the neighbor took a shortcut across the farm to visit an acquaintance. The neighbor was wounded by a shot fired by one of the farmer's friends, who was shooting at quail and carelessly failed to see the neighbor. Traditional rules of landowners' and occupiers' liability apply. In an action by the neighbor against the farmer to recover for the injuries, will the neighbor be likely to prevail?\nA. No, because the farmer is not responsible for his friends' conduct.\nB. No, because the neighbor was trespassing.\nC. Yes, because the careless friend was permitted to hunt without safety training.\nD. Yes, because the use of firearms is an abnormally dangerous activity.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:17.738444+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 521, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.117", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "B", "picked": null, "sampled": "A", "options": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:17.738490+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 522, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.180", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A man's car sustained moderate damage in a collision with a car driven by a woman. The accident was caused solely by the woman's negligence. The man's car was still drivable after the accident. Examining the car the next morning, the man could see that a rear fender had to be replaced. He also noticed that gasoline had dripped onto the garage floor. The collision had caused a small leak in the gasoline tank. The man then took the car to a mechanic, who owns and operates a body shop, and arranged with the mechanic to repair the damage. During their discussion the man neglected to mention the gasoline leakage. Thereafter, while the mechanic was loosening some of the damaged material with a hammer, he caused a spark, igniting vapor and gasoline that had leaked from the fuel tank. The mechanic was severely burned. The mechanic has brought an action to recover damages against the man and woman. The jurisdiction has adopted a pure comparative negligence rule in place of the traditional common law rule of contributory negligence. The jury found that while a reasonable person in the man's position would have warned the mechanic about the gasoline leak, the man had no actual knowledge of the risk that the gasoline leak presented. In this action, will the mechanic obtain a judgment against the man?\nA. No, because it was the mechanic's job to inspect the vehicle and repair whatever needed repair.\nB. No, because the man was not aware of the risk that the gasoline leak presented.\nC. Yes, because a reasonable person in the man's position would have warned the mechanic about the gasoline leak.\nD. Yes, because the car was unreasonably dangerous when the man delivered it to the mechanic.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:17.953581+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 523, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.180", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "C", "picked": "C", "sampled": "C", "options": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:17.953628+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 524, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.291", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A company operates an aircraft maintenance and repair business serving the needs of owners of private airplanes. A pilot contracted with the company to replace the engine in his plane with a more powerful engine of foreign manufacture. The company purchased the replacement engine through a representative of the manufacturer and installed it in the pilot's plane. A short time after it was put into use, the new engine failed, and the plane crashed into a warehouse, destroying the warehouse and its contents. The company was guilty of no negligence in the procurement, inspection, or installation of the engine. The failure of the engine was caused by a defect that would not be disclosed by inspection and testing procedures available to an installer. There was no negligence on the part of the pilot, who escaped the disabled plane by parachute. The warehouse owner recovered a judgment for damages from the pilot for the destruction of his warehouse and its contents, and the pilot has asserted a claim against the company to recover compensation on account of that liability. In that action, the pilot will recover\nA. full compensation, because the engine was defective.\nB. no compensation, because the company was not negligent.\nC. contribution only, because the company and the pilot were equally innocent.\nD. no compensation, because the warehouse owner's judgment established the pilot's responsibility to the warehouse owner.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:17.993536+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 525, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.291", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "A", "picked": null, "sampled": "B", "options": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:17.993576+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 526, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.186", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A group of children, ranging in age from eight to 15, regularly played football on the common area of an apartment complex. Most of the children lived in the apartment complex, but some lived elsewhere. The owner of the apartment complex knew that the children played on the common area and had not objected. The plaintiff, a 13-year-old who did not live in the apartment complex, fell over a sprinkler head while running for a pass and broke his leg. Although the plaintiff had played football on the common area before, he had never noticed the sprinkler heads. The sprinkler heads protruded one inch above the ground and were unlikely to be discovered by a passerby. If a claim is asserted on the plaintiff's behalf, he will\nA. prevail, because the sprinkler head was a hazard that the plaintiff probably would not discover.\nB. prevail, because the apartment complex owner had not objected to children playing on the common area.\nC. not prevail, because the plaintiff did not live in the apartment complex.\nD. not prevail, because the sprinkler heads were not abnormally dangerous to users of the common area.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:18.003850+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 527, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.186", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "A", "picked": "A", "sampled": "A", "options": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:18.003889+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 528, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.198", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "Unaware that a lawyer was in the county courthouse library late on a Friday afternoon, when it was unusual for anyone to be using the library, a clerk locked the library door and left. The lawyer found herself locked in when she tried to leave the library at 7 p. m. It was midnight before the lawyer's family could find out where she was and get her out. The lawyer was very annoyed by her detention but was not otherwise harmed by it. Does the lawyer have a viable claim for false imprisonment against the clerk?\nA. No, because it was unusual for anyone to be using the library late on a Friday afternoon.\nB. No, because the clerk did not intend to confine the lawyer.\nC. Yes, because the clerk should have checked to make sure no one was in the library before the clerk locked the door.\nD. Yes, because the lawyer was aware of being confined.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:18.106090+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 529, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.198", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "B", "picked": null, "sampled": "C", "options": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:18.106143+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 530, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.272", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "An eight-year-old child went to the grocery store with her mother. The child pushed the grocery cart while her mother put items into it. The child's mother remained near the child at all times. Another customer in the store noticed the child pushing the cart in a manner that caused the customer no concern. A short time later, the cart the child was pushing struck the customer in the knee, inflicting serious injury. If the customer brings an action, based on negligence, against the grocery store, the store's best defense will be that\nA. a store owes no duty to its customers to control the use of its shopping carts.\nB. a store owes no duty to its customers to control the conduct of other customers.\nC. any negligence of the store was not the proximate cause of the customer's injury.\nD. a supervised child pushing a cart does not pose an unreasonable risk to other customers.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:18.337373+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 531, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.272", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "D", "picked": "D", "sampled": "D", "options": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:18.337434+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 532, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.96", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "As a seller, an encyclopedia salesman, approached the grounds on which a homeowner's house was situated, he saw a sign that said, \"No salesmen. Trespassers will be prosecuted. Proceed at your own risk. \" Although the seller had not been invited to enter, he ignored the sign and drove up the driveway toward the house. As he rounded a curve, a powerful explosive charge buried in the driveway exploded, and the seller was injured. Can the seller recover damages from the homeowner for his injuries?\nA. Yes, because the homeowner was responsible for the explosive charge under the driveway.\nB. Yes, because the homeowner, when he planted the charge, intended to harm a possible intruder.\nC. No, because the seller ignored the sign, which warned him against proceeding further.\nD. No, because the homeowner reasonably feared that intruders would come and harm him or his family.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:18.372435+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 533, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.96", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "A", "picked": null, "sampled": "C", "options": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:18.372495+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 534, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.8", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A company manufactured metal stamping presses that were usually sold with an installed safety device that made it impossible for a press to close on a worker's hands. The company strongly recommended that its presses be purchased with the safety device installed, but would sell a press without the safety device at a slightly reduced price. Rejecting the company's advice, a worker's employer purchased a stamping press without the safety device. The press closed on the worker's hand, crushing it. If the worker were to sue the company, would the worker be likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the company's press was the cause in fact of the worker's injury.\nB. Yes, because the company sold the press to the worker's employer without an installed safety device.\nC. No, because the failure of the worker's employer to purchase the press with a safety device was a superseding cause of the worker's injury.\nD. No, because the company strongly recommended that the worker's employer purchase the press with the safety device.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:18.391098+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 535, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.8", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "B", "picked": "B", "sampled": "B", "options": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:18.391155+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 536, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.233", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "While driving his car, the plaintiff sustained injuries in a three-vehicle collision. The plaintiff sued the drivers of the other two vehicles, a truck and a bus, and each defendant crossclaimed against the other for contribution. The jurisdiction has adopted a rule of pure comparative negligence and allows contribution based upon proportionate fault. The rule of joint and several liability has been retained. The jury has found that the plaintiff sustained damages in the amount of $100,000, and apportioned the causal negligence of the parties as follows: The plaintiff 40%, the truck driver 30%, and the bus driver 30%. How much, if anything, can the plaintiff collect from the truck driver, and how much, if anything, can the truck driver then collect from the bus driver in contribution?\nA. Nothing, and then the truck driver can collect nothing from the bus driver.\nB. $30,000, and then the truck driver can collect nothing from the bus driver.\nC. $40,000, and then the truck driver can collect $10,000 from the bus driver.\nD. $60,000, and then the truck driver can collect $30,000 from the bus driver.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:18.469634+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 537, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.233", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "D", "picked": null, "sampled": "B", "options": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:18.469687+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 538, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.37", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A plaintiff suffered a severe loss when his manufacturing plant, located in a shallow ravine, was flooded during a sustained rainfall. The flooding occurred because the city had failed to maintain its storm drain, which was located on city land above the plaintiff's premises, and because a railroad had failed to maintain its storm drain, which was located on railroad land below the plaintiff's premises. The flooding would not have occurred if either one of the two storm drains had been maintained properly. The plaintiff sued the railroad to recover compensation for his loss. The evidence in the case established that the failures of the two drains were caused by the respective negligence of the city and the railroad. There is no special rule insulating the city from liability. In his action against the railroad, the plaintiff should recover\nA. nothing, because he should have joined the city, without whose negligence he would have suffered no loss.\nB. nothing, because he did not introduce evidence that enables the court reasonably to apportion responsibility between the city and the railroad.\nC. one-half his loss, in the absence of evidence that enables the court to allocate responsibility fairly between the city and the railroad.\nD. all of his loss, because but for the railroad's negligence none of the flooding would have occurred.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:18.514528+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 539, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.37", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "D", "picked": "D", "sampled": "D", "options": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:18.514563+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 540, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.200", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A consumer bought a kitchen blender from the manufacturer. Soon after the purchase, the consumer was using the blender in an appropriate way when the blender jar shattered, throwing a piece of glass into the consumer's eye. The consumer brought an action against the manufacturer based solely on strict products liability. The consumer's expert testified that the blender was defectively designed. However, because the blender jar had been destroyed in the accident, the expert could not determine whether the accident had been caused by the design defect or a manufacturing defect. The manufacturer's expert testified that the blender was not defective. If, at the conclusion of the evidence, both parties move for directed verdicts, how should the trial judge rule?\nA. Direct a verdict for the manufacturer, because the consumer's expert was unable to specify the nature of the defect.\nB. Direct a verdict for the manufacturer, because the consumer's action was brought solely on a strict liability theory.\nC. Direct a verdict for the consumer, because the blender was new when the jar shattered, and thus was undeniably defective.\nD. Deny both motions and send the case to the jury, because a jury reasonably could conclude that the harm was caused by a defect present in the product when it was sold.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:18.694125+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 541, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.200", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "D", "picked": "D", "sampled": "D", "options": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:18.694173+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 542, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.324", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A male employee who worked at a psychiatric hospital had sexual relations with a patient in her room at the hospital. The patient was severely mentally disabled, and although the patient did not initiate the encounter, she did not protest. A tort action was brought on the patient's behalf against the hospital. The hospital contends that the employee's actions were outside the scope of his employment. Is the patient likely to prevail?\nA. No, because the employee's actions were outside the scope of his employment.\nB. No, because the patient encouraged the employee's actions by not protesting.\nC. Yes, because the employee worked for the hospital.\nD. Yes, because the hospital failed to use reasonable care to protect the patient from such conduct.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:18.749893+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 543, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.324", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "D", "picked": "D", "sampled": "D", "options": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:18.749935+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 544, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.171", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A recently installed elevator suddenly started free-falling down the elevator shaft while carrying passengers. Frightened, a passenger pried the inside doors open and impulsively stuck his arm through them to try to stop the fall. As a result, his arm was broken. The elevator eventually stopped without causing further injuries. In a negligence action brought by the injured passenger against the company that installed and maintained the elevator, the injured passenger has asked the trial judge to instruct the jury that it may find the company negligent on a theory of res ipsa loquitur. In response, the company has argued that the passenger's conduct caused his injuries. How should the judge rule?\nA. The judge should deny the passenger's request, because it is possible that the company was not negligent.\nB. The judge should deny the passenger's request, because the jury could find that the conduct of the passenger contributed to his injuries.\nC. The judge should grant the passenger's request but should also instruct the jurors to consider any carelessness of the passenger in awarding damages if they find the company liable.\nD. The judge should grant the passenger's request, because the passenger acted reasonably considering the stress of the situation.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:18.772369+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 545, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.171", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "C", "picked": "C", "sampled": "C", "options": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:18.772427+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 546, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.87", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "Two law school classmates had competed for the position of editor of the law review. One of the students had a higher grade point average, but the other student was elected editor, largely in recognition of a long and important note that had appeared in the review over her name. During the following placement interview season, the student with the higher GPA was interviewed by a representative of a nationally prominent law firm. In response to the interviewer's request for information about the authorship of the law review note, the student said that he had heard that the note attributed to the law review editor was largely the work of another student. However, the student knew that the law review editor had written the note on her own. The firm told the law review editor that it would not interview her because of doubts about the authorship of the note. This greatly distressed her. In fact the note had been prepared by the law review editor without assistance from anyone else. If the law review editor asserts a claim against the other student based on defamation, she will\nA. recover, because the other student's statement was false.\nB. recover, because the other student exceeded the scope of any qualified privilege.\nC. not recover, because the law review editor did not prove pecuniary loss.\nD. not recover, because the statement was made by the other student only after the interviewer inquired about the authorship of the note.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:18.887371+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 547, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.87", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "B", "picked": null, "sampled": "A", "options": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:18.887412+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 548, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.42", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A defendant, an inexperienced driver, borrowed a car from the plaintiff, a casual acquaintance, for the express purpose of driving it several blocks to the local drug store. Instead, the defendant drove the car, which then was worth $12,000, 100 miles to another city. While the defendant was driving in the other city the next day, the car was hit by a negligently driven truck and sustained damage that will cost $3,000 to repair. If repaired, the car will be fully restored to its former condition. If the plaintiff asserts a claim against the defendant based on conversion, the plaintiff should recover a judgment for\nA. $12,000.\nB. $3,000.\nC. $3,000 plus damages for the loss of the use of the car during its repair.\nD. nothing, because the defendant was not negligent.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["A. $12,000."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:19.080416+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 549, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.42", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "A", "picked": "A", "sampled": "A. $12,000.", "options": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:19.080458+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 550, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.16", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "An elderly neighbor hired a 17-year-old boy with a reputation for reckless driving to drive the neighbor on errands once a week. One day the teenager, driving the neighbor's car, took the neighbor to the grocery store. While the neighbor was in the store, the teenager drove out of the parking lot and headed for a party on the other side of town. While on his way to the party, the teenager negligently turned in front of a moving car and caused a collision. The other driver was injured in the collision. The injured driver has brought an action for damages against the neighbor, based on negligent entrustment, and against the teenager. The jury has found that the injured driver's damages were $100,000, that the injured driver was 10% at fault, that the teenager was 60% at fault, and that the neighbor was 30% at fault for entrusting his car to the teenager. Based on these damage and responsibility amounts, what is the maximum that the injured driver could recover from the neighbor?\nA. $100,000.\nB. $90,000.\nC. $60,000.\nD. $30,000.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:19.105369+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 551, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.16", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "B", "picked": "B", "sampled": "B", "options": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:19.105412+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 552, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.249", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A homeowner was injured when he slipped and fell in a puddle of water on his sunroom floor; the water had accumulated on the floor during a rainstorm because of leaks in the roof. The roof's manufacturer had supplied nondefective materials to the installer, who was a franchisee (and not an employee) of the manufacturer. The leaks resulted from the carelessness of the installer during the installation of the roof. The installer's truck, which had been parked in front of the homeowner's house during the roof installation, bore the manufacturer's logo. The manufacturer was aware that the truck and the literature supplied by the installer both displayed the manufacturer's logo. Is there any basis for a claim by the homeowner against the manufacturer?\nA. No, because a franchisor has no duty to supervise the conduct of a franchisee.\nB. No, under the rule that a manufacturer is liable only for defects in a product that existed at the time the product left the hands of the manufacturer.\nC. Yes, because the installer was a franchisee of the manufacturer.\nD. Yes, under the rule of apparent agency.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:19.111249+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 553, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.249", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "D", "picked": "D", "sampled": "D", "options": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:19.111300+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 554, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.214", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A purchaser ordered some merchandise from a store. When the merchandise was delivered, the purchaser decided that it was not what he had ordered, and he returned it for credit. The store refused to credit the purchaser's account, continued to bill him, and, after 90 days, turned the account over to a bill collector for collection. The bill collector showed up at the purchaser's house at 7 p. m. on a summer evening while many of the purchaser's neighbors were seated on their porches. When the purchaser opened the door, the bill collector, who was standing just outside the door, raised an electrically amplified bullhorn to his mouth. In a voice that could be heard a block away, the bill collector called the purchaser a \"deadbeat\" and asked him when he intended to pay his bill to the store. The purchaser, greatly angered, embarrassed, and distressed, slammed the door shut. The door struck the bullhorn and jammed it forcibly against the bill collector's face. As a consequence, the bill collector lost some of his front teeth. If the purchaser asserts a claim based on intentional infliction of emotional distress against the bill collector, will the purchaser prevail?\nA. Yes, because the bill collector's conduct was extreme and outrageous.\nB. Yes, because the bill collector was intruding on the purchaser's property.\nC. No, because the purchaser did not suffer physical harm.\nD. No, because the purchaser still owed a store for the merchandise.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:19.193070+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 555, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.214", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "A", "picked": "A", "sampled": "A", "options": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:19.193118+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 556, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.92", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "The warden of a state prison prohibits the photographing of the face of any prisoner without the prisoner's consent. A news photographer wanted to photograph a notorious mobster incarcerated at the state prison. To circumvent the warden's prohibition, the photographer flew over the prison exercise yard and photographed the mobster. A prisoner, who was imprisoned for a technical violation of a regulatory statute, happened to be standing next to the mobster when the photograph was taken. When the picture appeared in the press, the prisoner suffered severe emotional distress because he believed that his business associates and friends would think he was consorting with gangsters. The prisoner suffered no physical harm as the result of his emotional distress. The prisoner brought an action against the photographer for intentional and reckless infliction of emotional distress. What is the best argument that the photographer can make in support of a motion for summary judgment?\nA. No reasonable person could conclude that the photographer intended to photograph the prisoner.\nB. The prisoner did not suffer any physical injury arising from the emotional distress.\nC. As a news photographer, the photographer was privileged to take photographs that others could not.\nD. No reasonable person could conclude that the photographer's conduct was extreme and outrageous as to the prisoner.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:19.209837+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 557, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.92", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "D", "picked": "D", "sampled": "D", "options": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:19.209875+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 558, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.134", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A homeowner was injured when an automatic cutoff switch failed to function on a snowblower he was using. The cutoff switch had functioned well for a year after he purchased the snowblower but failed after the machine had been improperly repaired by &nbsp;a mechanic. The snowblower's operating manual contained a clear and prominent warning against making the very alteration to the switch mechanism that was made by the mechanic. The mechanic, however, did not have a manual available when he repaired the snowblower. Does the homeowner have a viable claim against the manufacturer of the snowblower for damages?\nA. No, because the homeowner was contributorily negligent in failing to furnish the snowblower's manual to the mechanic.\nB. No, because the injury resulted from a substantial alteration of the snowblower by a third party.\nC. Yes, because a defect in the snowblower caused the homeowner's injury.\nD. Yes, because the manufacturer should have made the manual available to repair personnel.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:19.268960+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 559, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.134", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "B", "picked": "B", "sampled": "B", "options": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:19.269000+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 560, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.261", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A plaintiff and a man were passengers sitting in adjoining seats on a flight on an airline. There were many empty seats on the aircraft. During the flight, a flight attendant served the man nine drinks. As the man became more and more obviously intoxicated and attempted to engage the plaintiff in a conversation, the plaintiff chose to ignore the man. This angered the man, who suddenly struck the plaintiff in the face, giving her a black eye. If the plaintiff asserts a claim for damages against the airline based on battery, she will\nA. prevail, because she suffered an intentionally inflicted harmful or offensive contact.\nB. prevail, because the flight attendant acted recklessly in continuing to serve liquor to the man.\nC. not prevail, because the man was not acting as an agent or employee of the airline.\nD. not prevail, because she cannot establish some permanent injury from the contact.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:19.516271+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 561, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.261", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "C", "picked": "C", "sampled": "C", "options": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:19.516352+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 562, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.191", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A widow recently purchased a new uncrated electric range for her kitchen from a local retailer. The range has a wide oven with a large oven door. The crate in which the manufacturer shipped the range carried a warning label that the stove would tip over with a weight of 25 pounds or more on the oven door. The widow has one child, aged 3. Recently, the child was playing on the floor of the kitchen while the widow was heating water in a pan on the stove. The widow left the kitchen for a moment, and the child opened the oven door and climbed on it to see what was in the pan. The child's weight (25 pounds) on the door caused the stove to tip over forward. The child fell to the floor and the hot water spilled over her, burning her severely. The child screamed. The widow ran to the kitchen and immediately gave her first aid treatment for burns. The child thereafter received medical treatment. The child's burns were painful. They have now healed and do not bother her, but she has ugly scars on her legs and back. The child's claim is asserted on her behalf by the proper party. If the child asserts a claim based on strict liability against the local retailer, she must establish that\nA. the local retailer did not inform the widow of the warning on the crate.\nB. the stove was substantially in the same condition at the time it tipped over as when it was purchased from the local retailer.\nC. the local retailer made some change in the stove design or had improperly assembled it so that it tipped over more easily.\nD. the local retailer knew or should have known that the stove was dangerous because of the ease with which it tipped over.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:19.568273+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 563, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.191", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "B", "picked": "B", "sampled": "B", "options": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:19.568309+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 564, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.266", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A man tied his dog to a bike rack in front of a store and left the dog there while he went inside to shop. The dog was usually friendly and placid. A five-year-old child started to tease the dog by pulling gently on its ears and tail. When the man emerged from the store and saw what the child was doing to the dog, he became extremely upset. Does the man have a viable claim against the child for trespass to chattels?\nA. No, because the child did not injure the dog.\nB. No, because the child was too young to form the requisite intent.\nC. Yes, because the child touched the dog without the man's consent.\nD. Yes, because the child's acts caused the man extreme distress.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:19.691243+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 565, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.266", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "A", "picked": "A", "sampled": "A", "options": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:19.691293+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 566, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.6", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A water pipe burst in the basement of a grocery store, flooding the basement and damaging cases of canned goods on the floor. The plumbing contractor's workmen, in repairing the leak, knocked over several stacks of canned goods in cases, denting the cans. After settling its claims against the landlord for the water leak and against the plumbing contractor for the damage done by his workmen, the grocery store put the goods on special sale. Four weeks later, a customer was shopping in the grocery store. Several tables in the market were covered with assorted canned foods, all of which were dirty and dented. A sign on each of the tables read: \"Damaged Cans - Half Price. \"The customer was having a guest over for dinner that evening and purchased two dented cans of tuna, packed by a canning company, from one of the tables displaying the damaged cans. Before the guest arrived, the customer prepared a tuna casserole which she and the guest later ate. Both became ill, and the medical testimony established that the illness was caused by the tuna's being unfit for consumption. The tuna consumed by the customer and the guest came from the case that was at the top of one of the stacks knocked over by the workmen. The tuna in undamaged cans from the same canning company's shipment was fit for consumption. If the guest asserts a claim against the grocery store, the most likely result is that the guest will\nA. recover on the theory of res ipsa loquitur.\nB. recover on the theory of strict liability.\nC. not recover, because the grocery store gave proper warning.\nD. not recover, because the guest was not the purchaser of the cans.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:19.715863+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 567, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.6", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "B", "picked": "B", "sampled": "B", "options": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:19.715939+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 568, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.248", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A bright 12-year-old child attended a day-care center after school. The center was located near a man-made duck pond on the property of a corporation. During the winter, the pond was used for ice-skating when conditions were suitable. At a time when the pond was obviously only partially frozen, the child sneaked away from the center's property and walked out onto the ice over the pond. The ice gave way, and the child fell into the cold water. He suffered shock and would have drowned had he not been rescued by a passerby. At the time of the incident, the pond was clearly marked with numerous signs that stated, \"THIN ICE—KEEP OFF. \" When the child sneaked away from the day-care center, the center was staffed with a reasonable number of qualified employees, and the employees were exercising reasonable care to ensure that the children in their charge did not leave the premises. There had not been a previous instance of a child coming onto the corporation's property from the day-care center. The jurisdiction follows a rule of pure comparative negligence. In a suit brought on the child's behalf against the day-care center and based only on the facts above, who is likely to prevail?\nA. The child, because he left the center while he was under the center's care.\nB. The child, because the day-care center is located near a pond.\nC. The day-care center, because it was not negligent.\nD. The day-care center, because the child was a trespasser.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:19.775207+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 569, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.248", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "C", "picked": null, "sampled": "A", "options": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:19.775245+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 570, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.222", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A city ordinance makes it unlawful to park a motor vehicle on a city street within 10 feet of a fire hydrant. At 1:55 p. m. a man, realizing he must be in the bank before it closed at 2:00 p. m. , and finding no other space available, parked his automobile in front of a fire hydrant on a city street. The man then hurried into the bank, leaving his aged neighbor as a passenger in the rear seat of the car. About five minutes later, and while the man was still in the bank, a driver was driving down the street. The driver swerved to avoid what he mistakenly thought was a hole in the street and sideswiped the man's car. The man's car was turned over on top of the hydrant, breaking the hydrant and causing a small flood of water. The man's car was severely damaged and the neighbor was badly injured. There is no applicable guest statute. If the neighbor asserts a claim against the man, the most likely result is that the neighbor will\nA. recover, because the man's action was negligence per se.\nB. recover, because the man's action was a continuing wrong which contributed to the neighbor's injuries.\nC. not recover, because a reasonably prudent person could not foresee injury to the neighbor as a result of the man's action.\nD. not recover, because a violation of a city ordinance does not give rise to a civil cause of action.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:19.810630+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 571, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.222", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "C", "picked": null, "sampled": "D", "options": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:19.810676+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 572, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.203", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A defendant and a group of his friends are fanatical basketball fans who regularly meet at each others' houses to watch basketball games on television. Some of the group are fans of the home team, and others are fans of the rival team. When the group has watched televised games between these two teams, fights sometimes have broken out among the group. Despite this fact, the defendant invited the group to his house to watch a championship game between the home team and the rival team. During the game, the defendant's guests became rowdy and antagonistic. Fearing that they would begin to fight, and that a fight would damage his possessions, the defendant asked his guests to leave. They refused to go and soon began to fight. The defendant called the police, and a police officer was sent to the defendant's home. The officer sustained a broken nose in his efforts to stop the fighting. The officer brought an action against the defendant alleging that the defendant was negligent in inviting the group to his house to watch this championship game. The defendant has moved to dismiss the complaint. The best argument in support of this motion would be that\nA. a rescuer injured while attempting to avert a danger cannot recover damages from theangered person.\nB. a police officer is not entitled to a recovery based upon the negligent conduct that created the need for the officer's professional intervention.\nC. as a matter of law, the defendant's conduct was not the proximate cause of the officer's injury.\nD. the defendant did not owe the officer a duty to use reasonable care, because the officer was a mere licensee on the defendant's property.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:19.938795+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 573, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.203", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "B", "picked": "B", "sampled": "B", "options": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:19.938830+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 574, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.275", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A store owner owned a secondhand goods store. He often placed merchandise on the sidewalk, sometimes for short intervals, sometimes from 7:00 a. m. until 6:00 p. m. Pedestrians from time to time stopped and gathered to look at the merchandise. A man had moved into an apartment that was situated immediately above the store; a street-level stairway entrance was located about 20 feet to the east. On several occasions, the man had complained to the store owner about the situation because not only were his view and peace of mind affected, but his travel on the sidewalk was made more difficult. The man owned and managed a restaurant two blocks to the west of his apartment and made frequent trips back and forth. There was a back entrance to his apartment through a parking lot; this entrance was about 200 feet farther in walking distance from his restaurant. Once the man complained to the police, whereupon the store owner was arrested under a local ordinance which prohibited the placing of goods or merchandise on public sidewalks and imposed, as its sole sanction, a fine for its violation. One day, the sidewalk in front of the store owner's store was unusually cluttered because he was cleaning and mopping the floor of his shop. The man and his 15-year-old son saw a bus they wished to take, and they raced down the stairs and onto the cluttered sidewalk in front of the store, the man in the lead. While dodging merchandise and people, the man fell. The son tripped over him and suffered a broken arm. The man also suffered broken bones and was unable to attend to his duties for six weeks. If prior to the day of his personal injuries, the man had asserted a claim based on public nuisance for injunctive relief against the store owner for his obstruction of the sidewalk in violation of the ordinance, the defense on which the store owner would have most likely prevailed is that\nA. the man consented to the obstruction by continuing to rent his apartment.\nB. the violation of the ordinance was not unreasonable.\nC. remedy of abatement by self-help was adequate.\nD. there was no claim for special damage.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["A."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:19.942724+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 575, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.275", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "D", "picked": null, "sampled": "A.", "options": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:19.942758+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 576, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.262", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "While a woman was in her kitchen, she heard the screech of automobile tires. She ran to the window and saw a tricycle flying through the air. The tricycle had been hit by a car driven by a young man, who had been speeding. She also saw a child's body in the grass adjacent to the street. As a result of her shock from this experience, the woman suffered a heart attack. In a claim by the woman against the young man, the woman's right to recovery will depend on whether\nA. a person can recover damages based on the defendant's breach of a duty owed to another.\nB. it is foreseeable that a person may suffer physical harm caused solely by an injury inflicted on another.\nC. a person can recover damages caused by shock unaccompanied by bodily impact.\nD. a person can recover damages for harm resulting from shock caused solely by another's peril or injury.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:19.955918+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 577, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.262", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "D", "picked": null, "sampled": "C", "options": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:19.955956+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 578, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.312", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A roofer entered into a written contract to repair a homeowner's roof, the repairs to be done \"in a workmanlike manner. \" The roofer completed the repairs and took all of his equipment away, with the exception of a 20-foot extension ladder, which was left against the side of the house. He intended to come back and get the ladder the next morning. At that time, the homeowner and her family were away on a trip. During the night, a thief, using the ladder to gain access to an upstairs window, entered the house and stole some valuable jewels. The homeowner has asserted a claim against the roofer for damages for the loss of the jewels. In her claim against the roofer, will the homeowner prevail?\nA. Yes, because by leaving the ladder the roofer became a trespasser on the owner's property.\nB. Yes, because by leaving the ladder, the roofer created the risk that a person might unlawfully enter the house.\nC. No, because the act of the thief was a superseding cause.\nD. No, because the owner's claim is limited to damages for breach of contract.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:20.204145+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 579, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.312", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "B", "picked": "B", "sampled": "B", "options": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:20.204184+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 580, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.289", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A pilot was flying his small plane when he experienced engine trouble and was forced to make an emergency landing. He landed the plane safely in a large yard behind a home located in a relatively remote area. Unfortunately, when he disembarked from the plane, he was attacked and injured by two large dogs kept by the homeowner to discourage trespassers. The homeowner, who had seen the plane land, had ordered the dogs to attack. Several months earlier, the homeowner had posted large signs around the perimeter of the yard warning of the dogs. Does the pilot have a viable claim against the homeowner for battery?\nA. No, because the homeowner had provided adequate warning.\nB. No, because the pilot was a trespasser.\nC. Yes, because the pilot can invoke the privilege of necessity.\nD. Yes, because the pilot could not reasonably have been expected to see the warning signs posted by the homeowner.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:20.303916+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 581, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.289", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "C", "picked": "C", "sampled": "C", "options": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:20.303953+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 582, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.175", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "Two parents purchased a new mobile home from a seller. The mobile home was manufactured by Mobilco and had a ventilating system designed by Mobilco with both a heating unit and an air conditioner. Mobilco installed a furnace manufactured by Heatco and an air conditioning unit manufactured by Coolco. Each was controlled by an independent thermostat installed by Mobilco. Because of the manner in which Mobilco designed the ventilating system, the first time the ventilating system was operated by the parents, cold air was vented into the parents' bedroom to keep the temperature at 68 degrees F (20 degrees C). The cold air then activated the heater thermostat, and hot air was pumped into the bedroom of the six-month-old child of the parents. The temperature in the child's room reached more than 170 degrees F (77 degrees C) before the child's mother became aware of the condition and shut the system off manually. As a result, the child suffered permanent physical injury. Claims have been asserted by the child, through a duly appointed guardian, against Mobilco, the seller, Heatco, and Coolco. If the child's claims against Mobilco, Heatco, and Coolco are based on strict liability in tort, the child will probably recover against\nA. Mobilco only, because the ventilating system was defectively designed by Mobilco.\nB. Heatco only, because it was the excessive heat from the furnace that caused the child's injuries.\nC. Mobilco and Heatco only, because the combination of Mobilco's design and Heatco's furnace caused the child's injuries.\nD. Mobilco, Heatco, and Coolco, because the combination of Mobilco's design, Heatco's furnace, and Coolco's air conditioning unit caused the child's injuries.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:20.387501+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 583, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.175", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "A", "picked": null, "sampled": "C", "options": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:20.387578+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 584, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.18", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A hiker sustained a head injury when he was struck by a limb that fell from a tree. At the time of his injury, the hiker was walking through a forest on private property without the property owner's knowledge or permission. It was determined that the limb fell because the tree was infested with termites. In an action by the hiker against the property owner to recover for his head injury, will the hiker be likely to prevail?\nA. No, because the property owner could not foresee that anyone would be injured.\nB. No, because the property owner breached no duty to the hiker, who was a trespasser.\nC. Yes, because the property owner had a duty to prevent the trees on his property from becoming dangerous.\nD. Yes, because the property owner is liable for hidden dangers on his property.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:20.409053+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 585, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.18", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "B", "picked": "B", "sampled": "B", "options": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:20.409095+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 586, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.105", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "The defendant parked her car in violation of a city ordinance that prohibits parking within 10 feet of a fire hydrant. The city ordinance was enacted solely to allow firefighters quick access to the hydrants in the case of an emergency. Because a man was driving negligently, his car sideswiped the defendant's parked car. The plaintiff, a passenger in the man's car, was injured in the collision. The plaintiff would not have been injured if the defendant was not parked by the fire hydrant. If the plaintiff asserts a claim against the defendant to recover damages for his injuries, basing his claim on the defendant's violation of the parking ordinance, will the plaintiff prevail?\nA. Yes, because the defendant was guilty of negligence per se.\nB. Yes, because the plaintiff would not have been injured had the defendant's car not been parked where it was.\nC. No, because the defendant's parked car was not an active or efficient cause of the plaintiff's injury.\nD. No, because the prevention of traffic accidents was not a purpose of the ordinance.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:20.491056+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 587, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.105", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "D", "picked": null, "sampled": "C", "options": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:20.491098+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 588, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.269", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A gas company built a large refining facility that conformed to zoning requirements on land near a landowner's property. The landowner had his own home and a mini-golf business on his property. In a nuisance action against the gas company, the landowner established that the refinery emitted fumes that made many people feel quite sick when they were outside on his property for longer than a few minutes. The landowner's mini-golf business had greatly declined as a consequence, and the value of his property had gone down markedly. Is the landowner likely to prevail?\nA. No, because the landowner has offered no evidence demonstrating that the gas company was negligent.\nB. No, because the refinery conforms to the zoning requirements.\nC. Yes, because the refinery has substantially and unreasonably interfered with the landowner's use and enjoyment of his property.\nD. Yes, because the value of the landowner's property has declined.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:20.497817+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 589, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.269", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "C", "picked": "C", "sampled": "C", "options": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:20.497972+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 590, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.267", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A school bus driver reported to a middle school principal that a student had harassed other children on the bus. The principal informed the student's parents of the bus driver's report and told them that, because of the student's behavior, the student could not ride the bus for the next week and would have to be driven to school by a parent. The following Monday morning, after the bus driver had let the children off the bus in front of the school, but before she could close the door and drive away, the student's father pulled his car directly in front of her bus, blocking the driver's path. Because there was another bus right behind hers, the driver was unable to move her bus. The father got out of his car and strode toward the open door of the bus, screaming at the driver: \"You messed with the wrong family! I am going to get you!\" Feeling threatened, the bus driver quickly closed the door. The father pounded on the door with enough force to dent it, screaming obscenities at the driver, until a school security guard intervened. If the driver were to sue the father, which cause of action would give her the best chance of recovery?\nA. Assault.\nB. Battery.\nC. Intentional infliction of emotional distress.\nD. Trespass to chattels.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:20.571703+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 591, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.267", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "A", "picked": "A", "sampled": "A", "options": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:20.571738+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 592, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.247", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "While driving his pickup truck with a friend riding in the open bed, the driver swerved, throwing his friend to the pavement. The friend sustained severe injuries. The friend had often ridden in the open bed of the truck, and on some of those occasions the driver had swerved to frighten his friend. The friend sued the driver to recover both compensatory damages for his injuries and punitive damages. Which cause of action would NOT permit the friend to recover punitive damages?\nA. Assault.\nB. Battery.\nC. Negligence.\nD. Recklessness.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:20.599954+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 593, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.247", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "C", "picked": "C", "sampled": "C", "options": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:20.599997+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 594, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.156", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A passenger departed on an ocean liner knowing that it would be a rough voyage due to predicted storms. The ocean liner was not equipped with the type of lifeboats required by the applicable statute. The passenger was swept overboard and drowned in a storm so heavy that even a lifeboat that conformed to the statute could not have been launched. In an action against the operator of the ocean liner brought by the passenger's representative, will the passenger's representative prevail?\nA. Yes, because the ocean liner was not equipped with the statutorily required lifeboats.\nB. Yes, because in these circumstances common carriers are strictly liable.\nC. No, because the storm was so severe that it would have been impossible to launch a statutorily required lifeboat.\nD. No, because the passenger assumed the risk by boarding the ocean liner knowing that it would be a rough voyage.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:20.664529+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 595, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.156", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "C", "picked": null, "sampled": "D", "options": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:20.664571+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 596, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.240", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A plaintiff was walking peacefully along a public street when he encountered the defendant, whom he had never seen before. Without provocation or warning, the defendant picked up a rock and struck the plaintiff with it. It was later established that the defendant was mentally ill and suffered recurrent hallucinations. If the plaintiff asserts a claim against the defendant based on battery, which of the following, if supported by evidence, will be the defendant's best defense?\nA. The defendant did not understand that his act was wrongful.\nB. The defendant did not desire to cause harm to the plaintiff.\nC. The defendant did not know that he was striking a person.\nD. The defendant thought the plaintiff was about to attack him.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:20.956714+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 597, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.240", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "C", "picked": null, "sampled": "A", "options": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:20.956778+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 598, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.135", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A motorist arranged to borrow his friend's car to drive for one day while the motorist's car was being repaired. The friend knew that the brakes on his car were faulty and might fail in an emergency. The friend forgot to tell the motorist about the brakes when the motorist picked up the car, but the friend did telephone the motorist's wife and told her about them. The wife, however, forgot to tell the motorist. The motorist was driving the friend's car at a reasonable rate of speed and within the posted speed limit with the motorist's wife as a passenger. Another car, driven by a woman, crossed in front of the motorist at an intersection and in violation of the traffic signal. The motorist tried to stop, but the brakes failed, and the two cars collided. If the brakes had been in proper working order, the motorist could have stopped in time to avoid the collision. The motorist and his wife were injured. If the motorist asserts a claim against the woman, the motorist will\nA. recover the full amount of his damages, because the motorist himself was not at fault.\nB. recover only a proportion of his damages, because the wife was also at fault.\nC. not recover, because the wife was negligent and a wife's negligence is imputed to her husband.\nD. not recover, because the failure of the brakes was the immediate cause of the collision.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:21.049890+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 599, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.135", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "A", "picked": null, "sampled": "D", "options": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:21.049930+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 600, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.149", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A plaintiff entered a drug store to make some purchases. As he was searching the aisles for various items, he noticed a display card containing automatic pencils. The display card was on a high shelf behind a cashier's counter. The plaintiff saw a sign on the counter that read, \"No Admittance, Employees Only. \" Seeing no clerks in the vicinity to help him, the plaintiff went behind the counter to get a pencil. A clerk then appeared behind the counter and asked whether she could help him. He said he just wanted a pencil and that he could reach the display card himself. The clerk said nothing further. While reaching for the display card, the plaintiff stepped sideways into an open shaft and fell to the basement, 10 feet below. The clerk knew of the presence of the open shaft, and had reason to believe that the plaintiff had not noticed it when stepping behind the counter. The plaintiff sued the drug store to recover damages for the injuries he sustained in the fall. The jurisdiction has adopted a rule of pure comparative negligence, and it follows traditional common-law rules governing the duties of a land possessor. Will the plaintiff recover a judgment against the drug store?\nA. No, because the plaintiff was a trespasser.\nB. No, because the plaintiff's injuries did not result from the defendant's willful or wanton misconduct.\nC. Yes, because the premises were defective with respect to a public invitee.\nD. Yes, because the clerk had reason to believe that the plaintiff was unaware of the open shaft.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:21.184872+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 601, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.149", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "D", "picked": "D", "sampled": "D", "options": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:21.184911+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 602, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.244", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A storekeeper who owns a large hardware store sells power saws for both personal and commercial use. He often takes old power saws as trade-ins on new ones. The old power saws are then completely disassembled and rebuilt with new bearings by the storekeeper's employees and sold by the storekeeper as \"reconditioned saws. \"A purchaser, the owner and operator of a cabinet-making shop, informed the storekeeper that he wanted to buy a reconditioned circular saw for use in his cabinet making business. However, the blade that was on the saw he picked out had very coarse teeth for cutting rough lumber. The purchaser told the storekeeper that he wanted a saw blade that would cut plywood. The storekeeper exchanged the coarse blade for a new one with finer teeth that would cut plywood smoothly but used the original shaft. The new blade was manufactured by Saw-Blade Company, which uses all available techniques to inspect its products for defects. The reconditioned saw had been manufactured by Power Saw Company. The week after the saw was purchased, an employee, who works for the purchaser in the purchaser's cabinet-making shop, was injured while using the saw. The employee's arm was severely cut. As a result, the cabinetmaking shop was shut down for a week until a replacement for the employee could be found. If the employee was injured while cutting plywood when the shaft holding the saw blade came loose when a bearing gave way and the shaft and blade flew off the saw, and if the employee asserts a claim based on strict liability in tort against Power Saw Company, the employee will probably\nA. recover because the shaft that came loose was a part of the saw when it was new.\nB. recover, because Power Saw Company was in the business of manufacturing dangerous machines.\nC. not recover, because the employee was not the buyer of the power saw.\nD. not recover, because the saw has been rebuilt by the storekeeper.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:21.201038+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 603, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.244", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "D", "picked": "D", "sampled": "D", "options": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:21.201076+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 604, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.10", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A man was admitted to a hospital after complaining of persistent severe headaches. While he was there, hospital staff failed to diagnose his condition, and he was discharged. Two days later, the man died of a massive brain hemorrhage due to a congenital defect in an artery. The man's wife has brought a wrongful death action against the hospital. The wife offers expert testimony that the man would have had a \"reasonable chance\" (not greater than 50%) of surviving the hemorrhage if he had been given appropriate medical care at the hospital. In what type of jurisdiction would the wife's suit most likely be successful?\nA. A jurisdiction that applies traditional common law rules concerning burden of proof.\nB. A jurisdiction that allows recovery based on strict liability.\nC. A jurisdiction that allows recovery for the loss of the chance of survival.\nD. A jurisdiction that recognizes loss of spousal consortium.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:21.278135+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 605, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.10", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "C", "picked": "C", "sampled": "C", "options": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:21.278206+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 606, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.220", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A restaurant owner applied to the state liquor board for transfer of the license of his bar and grill. The board held a hearing on the application. At that hearing, a man appeared without being subpoenaed and stated that the restaurant owner had underworld connections. Although the man did not know this information to be true, he reasonably believed it to be the truth. He had heard rumors about the restaurant owner's character and had noticed several known underworld figures going in and out of the bar and grill. In fact, the restaurant owner had no underworld connections, and the state liquor board did grant the license. In a claim against the man based on defamation, the restaurant owner will\nA. not recover, because the man reasonably believed his statement to be true.\nB. not recover, because the board granted the restaurant owner's application.\nC. recover, because the man's statement was false.\nD. recover, because the man appeared before the board voluntarily.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:21.301692+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 607, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.220", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "A", "picked": null, "sampled": "C", "options": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:21.301740+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 608, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.64", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "An experienced construction company purchased sand in bulk from a distributor. The construction company mixed the sand with water and cement to make concrete. The distributor knew that an improper ratio of sand, water, and cement would result in defective concrete, but the distributor played no role in determining the ratio used by the construction company in mixing the concrete. The construction company used the concrete to form supporting columns for a building. A year later, the building collapsed during a minor earthquake, causing injury to the occupants. Although the sand was not defective, the concrete forming the columns was defective because the mixture ratio of the sand, water, and cement was not proper. The defective concrete was a cause in fact of the collapse. Do the injured building occupants have viable strict liability claims against the sand distributor?\nA. No, because component suppliers are not strictly liable in tort.\nB. No, because the distributor neither advised nor participated with the construction company in determining the mixture of sand, water, and cement.\nC. Yes, because the concrete columns were defective.\nD. Yes, because the distributor knew that an improper mixture of sand, water, and cement would result in defective concrete.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:21.342661+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 609, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.64", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "B", "picked": "B", "sampled": "B", "options": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:21.342710+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 610, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.72", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A freelance photographer took a picture of an athlete in front of a shoe store. The athlete was a nationally known amateur basketball star who had received much publicity in the press. At the time, the window display in the shoe store featured \"Jumpers,\" a well-known make of basketball shoes. The photographer sold the picture, greatly enlarged, to the shoe store and told the shoe store that the photographer had the athlete's approval to do so and that the athlete had consented to the shoe store's showing the enlarged picture in the window. The shoe store recklessly believed the photographer and made no effort to ascertain whether the athlete had given his consent to the photographer. In fact, the athlete did not even know that the photographer had taken the picture. The shoe store put the enlarged picture in the window with the display of \"Jumpers\" shoes. The college that the athlete attended believed that the athlete had intentionallyorsed the shoe store and \"Jumpers\" shoes and subsequently canceled his athletic scholarship. If the athlete asserts a claim based on defamation against the shoe store, will he prevail?\nA. Yes, because the shoe store was reckless in accepting the photographer's statement that the photographer had the athlete's approval.\nB. Yes, because the defamatory material was in printed form.\nC. No, because the shoe store believed the photographer's statement that the photographer had the athlete's approval.\nD. No, because the picture of the athlete was not defamatory per se.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:21.511714+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 611, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.72", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "A", "picked": "A", "sampled": "A", "options": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:21.511762+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 612, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.161", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "In an action brought against a defendant by a pedestrian's legal representative, the only proof that the legal representative offered on liability were that: (1) the pedestrian was killed instantly while walking on the shoulder of the highway; (2) the defendant was driving the car that struck the pedestrian; and (3) there were no living witnesses to the accident other than the defendant, who denied negligence. The jurisdiction has adopted a rule of pure comparative negligence. If, at the of the plaintiff's case, the defendant moves for directed verdict, the trial judge should\nA. grant the motion, because the legal representative has offered no specific evidence from which reasonable jurors may conclude that the defendant was negligent.\nB. grant the motion, because it is just as likely that the pedestrian was negligent as that the defendant was negligent.\nC. deny the motion, because the pedestrian was in violation of the state highway code.\nD. deny the motion, because, in the circumstances, negligence on the part of the defendant may be inferred.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:21.736792+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 613, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.161", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "D", "picked": null, "sampled": "A", "options": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:21.736854+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 614, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.47", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "In a plaintiff's action for battery, the evidence established the following: the plaintiff was bad-tempered and, as the defendant knew, carried a gun and used it often; the plaintiff struck the defendant first; during the altercation, the plaintiff repeatedly tried to get to his gun; and the blows inflicted upon the plaintiff by the defendant resulted in the plaintiff being hospitalized. Which finding of fact would be most likely to result in a verdict for the defendant?\nA. The defendant used no more force than he actually believed was necessary to protect himself against death or serious bodily harm.\nB. The defendant used no more force than he reasonably believed was necessary to protect himself against death or serious bodily harm.\nC. The defendant, in fact, feared death or serious bodily harm.\nD. The defendant was justified in retaliating against the plaintiff because the plaintiff struck the first blow.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:21.813072+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 615, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.47", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "B", "picked": "B", "sampled": "B", "options": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:21.813116+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 616, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.35", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A drug company developed a new drug, ZB, for treatment of Wegener's disease. The company extensively tested ZB for several years on animals and human volunteers and had observed no undesirable side effects. The Federal Drug Administration (FDA) then approved ZB for sale as a prescription drug. Five other drug companies, each acting independently, developed drugs identical to ZB. Each of these drugs was also approved by the FDA for sale as a prescription drug. A wholesaler bought identically-shaped pills from all six of the manufacturers and sold the pills to drugstores as Wegener's X. This drug had a long-delayed side effect. Sons of male users of Wegener's X are sterile. One such son brought an action against the drug company for his damages. The drug company, through the wholesaler, supplied about 10 percent of the Wegener's X sold in the state where the son lived. It is not possible to establish which of the five companies supplied the particular pills that the son's father took. If the son asserts a claim against the drug company based on strict liability in tort, which of the following will be a decisive question in determining whether the son will prevail?\nA. Does the res ipsa loquitur doctrine apply?\nB. Can liability be imposed on the drug company without proof that the drug company knew that the drug had an undesirable side effect?\nC. Is the drug company relieved of liability by the FDA approval of the drug?\nD. Can liability be imposed on the drug company without showing that its pills were used by the son's father?\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:21.851896+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 617, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.35", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "D", "picked": "D", "sampled": "D", "options": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:21.851937+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 618, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.229", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A food company contracted with a delivery service to supply food to remote areas around the world. The contract between the food company and the delivery service was terminable at will. The delivery service then entered into a contract with an airline to provide an airplane to deliver the food. The contract between the delivery service and the airline was also terminable at will. The food company was displeased with the airline because of a previous business dispute between them. Upon learning of the delivery service's contract with the airline, the food company terminated its contract with the delivery service in order to cause the airline to lose the business. After the food company terminated the delivery service's contract, the delivery service had no choice but to terminate the airline contract. If the airline sues the delivery service for tortious interference with contract, will the airline prevail?\nA. No, because the airline and the delivery service were the parties to the contract.\nB. No, because the airline was not in privity with the food company.\nC. Yes, because the delivery service did not terminate the contract because of poor performance.\nD. Yes, because the delivery service's termination of the contract made it a party to the food company's acts.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:21.879026+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 619, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.229", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "A", "picked": null, "sampled": "D", "options": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:21.879075+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 620, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.22", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A gardener's backyard, which is landscaped with expensive flowers and shrubs, is adjacent to a golf course. While a golfer was playing golf on the course, a thunderstorm suddenly came up. As the golfer was returning to the clubhouse in his golf cart, lightning struck a tree on the course, and the tree began to fall in the golfer's direction. In order to avoid being hit by the tree, the golfer deliberately steered his cart onto the gardener's property, causing substantial damage to the gardener's expensive plantings. In an action by the gardener against the golfer to recover damages for the harm to his plantings, the gardener will\nA. prevail, because, although occasioned by necessity, the golfer's entry onto the gardener's property was for the golfer's benefit.\nB. prevail, for nominal damages only, because the golfer was privileged to enter the gardener's property.\nC. not prevail, because the lightning was an act of God.\nD. not prevail, because the golfer's entry onto the gardener's property was occasioned by necessity and therefore privileged.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:21.972253+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 621, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.22", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "A", "picked": "A", "sampled": "A", "options": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:21.972338+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 622, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.52", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A 14-year-old girl of low intelligence received her parents' permission to drive their car. She had had very little experience driving a car and did not have a driver's license. Although she did the best she could, she lost control of the car and hit a pedestrian. The pedestrian has brought a negligence action against the girl. &nbsp;Is the pedestrian likely to prevail?\nA. No, because only the girl's parents are subject to liability.\nB. No, because the girl was acting reasonably for a 14-year-old of low intelligence and little driving experience.\nC. Yes, because the girl was engaging in an adult activity.\nD. Yes, because the girl was not old enough to obtain a driver's license.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:21.972938+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 623, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.52", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "C", "picked": "C", "sampled": "C", "options": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:21.972998+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 624, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.293", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "Section 1 of the Vehicle Code of a state makes it illegal to cross a street in a central business district other than at a designated crosswalk. Section 2 of the Code prohibits parking any motor vehicle so that it blocks any part of a designated crosswalk. A pedestrian wanted to cross Main Street in the central business district of a city, located in the state, but a truck parked by a trucker was blocking the designated crosswalk. The pedestrian stepped out into Main Street and carefully walked around the back of the truck. The pedestrian was struck by a motor vehicle negligently operated by a driver. If the pedestrian asserts a claim against the driver, the pedestrian's failure to be in the crosswalk will have which of the following effects?\nA. It is not relevant in determining the right of the pedestrian.\nB. It may be considered by the trier of fact on the issue of the driver's liability.\nC. It will be considered an express assumption of risk.\nD. It will bar the pedestrian's recovery as a matter of law.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:22.084794+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 625, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.293", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "B", "picked": "B", "sampled": "B", "options": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:22.084856+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 626, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.3", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lead singer in a popular band was seriously injured in a car accident caused by the defendant's negligent driving. As a result of the lead singer's injury, the band's tour was canceled, and a backup singer was let go. Although the backup singer searched for other work, he remained unemployed. In an action against the defendant, can the backup singer recover for his loss of income attributable to the accident?\nA. No, because the defendant's liability does not extend to economic loss to the backup singer that arises solely from physical harm to the lead singer.\nB. No, because the defendant had no reason to foresee that by injuring the lead singer, he would cause harm to the backup singer.\nC. Yes, because the defendant's negligence was the cause in fact of the backup singer's loss.\nD. Yes, because the backup singer took reasonable measures to mitigate his loss.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:22.152726+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 627, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.3", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "B", "picked": null, "sampled": "A", "options": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:22.152767+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 628, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.193", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A bicycle company manufactured a bicycle that it sold to a retail bicycle dealer which in turn sold it to a bicyclist. Shortly thereafter, while the bicyclist was riding the bicycle along a city street, he saw a traffic light facing him turn from green to yellow. He sped up, hoping to cross the intersection before the light turned red. However, the bicyclist quickly realized that he could not do so and applied the brake, which failed. To avoid the traffic that was then crossing in front of him, the bicyclist turned sharply to his right and onto the sidewalk, where he struck a pedestrian. Both the pedestrian and the bicyclist sustained injuries. Assume that the brakes were faulty when the bike left the factory, and that the retail dealer carefully inspected the bike upon receipt but did not notice the defect. If bicyclist asserts a claim against the retailer based on strict liability in tort, will the bicyclist prevail?\nA. Yes, because the brake failed due to a defect present when the bicycle left the factory of the bicycle company.\nB. Yes, because the brake failed while the bicyclist was riding the bicycle.\nC. No, because the bicyclist contributed to his own injury by speeding up.\nD. No, because the retail dealer carefully inspected the bicycle before selling it.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:22.291447+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 629, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.193", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "A", "picked": "A", "sampled": "A", "options": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:22.291507+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 630, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.305", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A mother and her six-year-old child were on a walk when the mother stopped to talk with an elderly neighbor. Because the child resented having his mother's attention diverted by the neighbor, the child angrily threw himself against the neighbor and knocked her to the ground. The neighbor suffered a broken wrist as a result of the fall. In an action for battery by the neighbor against the child, what is the strongest argument for liability?\nA. The child intended to throw himself against the neighbor.\nB. The child was old enough to appreciate that causing a fall could inflict serious injury.\nC. The child was old enough to appreciate the riskiness of his conduct.\nD. The child was not justified in his anger.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:22.492708+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 631, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.305", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "A", "picked": null, "sampled": "C", "options": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:22.492760+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 632, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.337", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "While approaching an intersection with the red light against him, a motorist suffered a heart attack that rendered him unconscious. The motorist's car struck a child, who was crossing the street with the green light in her favor. Under the state motor vehicle code, it is an offense to drive through a red traffic light. The child sued the motorist to recover for her injuries. At trial it was stipulated that: (1) immediately prior to suffering the heart attack, the motorist had been driving within the speed limit, had seen the red light, and had begun to slow his car; (2) the motorist had no history of heart disease and no warning of this attack; (3) while the motorist was unconscious, his car ran the red light. On cross motions for directed verdicts on the issue of liability at the conclusion of the proofs, the court should\nA. grant the child's motion, because the motorist ran a red light in violation of the motor vehicle code.\nB. grant the child's motion, because, in the circumstances, reasonable persons would infer that the motorist was negligent.\nC. grant the motorist's motion, because he had no history of heart disease or warning of the heart attack.\nD. deny both motions and submit the case to the jury, to determine whether, in the circumstances, the motorist's conduct was that of a reasonably prudent person.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:22.541324+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 633, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.337", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "C", "picked": null, "sampled": "D", "options": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:22.541362+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 634, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.0", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A prominent fitness center offers long-term gym memberships that include access to all facilities, personal training sessions, and group classes in exchange for advance payment. State law permits purchasers of such memberships to cancel at any time, subject to a penalty imposed by the seller of up to 10% of the membership price. A former manager of the fitness center, who knew about the state law limitations, recently opened a new gym nearby. To attract customers, the former manager sent flyers to local residents stating that anyone who had already purchased a long-term gym membership had \"the right to cancel that membership at any time, for any reason, without penalty.\" The flyer also provided a $50 discount on a long-term membership at the new gym to anyone who canceled an existing membership elsewhere. After the promotion began, several members of the prominent fitness center canceled their memberships and joined the new gym. When the prominent fitness center withheld penalties from the refund amounts, the members objected and threatened to report the matter to the state consumer protection agency. The prominent fitness center has sued the former manager for tortious interference with contract. The former manager has moved for summary judgment, based on the facts mentioned. Should the court grant the motion?\nA. Yes, because the former manager was simply competing with the prominent fitness center.\nB. Yes, because the prominent fitness center's contracts with members were terminable at the members' discretion.\nC. No, because a reasonable jury could conclude that the former manager enticed members to take business away from the prominent fitness center.\nD. No, because the former manager could be found by a jury to have intentionally and improperly interfered with the prominent fitness center's contracts.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:22.561852+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 635, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.0", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "C", "picked": null, "sampled": "D", "options": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:22.561893+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 636, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.223", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A cigarette maker created and published a magazine advertisement that featured a person dressed as a race-car driver with a helmet on standing in front of a distinctive race car. In fact, the car looked almost exactly like the very unusually marked car driven by a famous and popular driver. The driver in the ad was not identified, and his face was not shown. The cigarette maker published the advertisement without obtaining the famous driver's permission. The famous race-car driver sued the cigarette maker for economic loss only, based on common law misappropriation of the right of publicity. The cigarette maker moved to dismiss the complaint. Will the cigarette maker's motion to dismiss the complaint be granted?\nA. No, because there are sufficient indicia of the famous driver's identity to support a verdict of liability.\nB. Yes, because the driver is a public figure.\nC. Yes, because there was no mention of the famous driver's name in the ad.\nD. Yes, because the famous driver did not claim any emotional or dignitary loss.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:22.600430+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 637, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.223", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "A", "picked": "A", "sampled": "A", "options": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:22.600463+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 638, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.125", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A customer fell and injured himself when he slipped on a banana peel while shopping at a grocery store. The banana peel was fresh and unblemished except for a mark made by the heel of the customer's shoe. In an action brought by the customer against the store, these are the only facts in evidence. Should the trial judge permit the case to go to the jury?\nA. No, because the customer had an obligation to watch where he stepped.\nB. No, because there is not a reasonable basis for inferring that the store knew or should have known of the banana peel.\nC. Yes, because it is more likely than not that the peel came from a banana offered for sale by the grocer.\nD. Yes, because the store could foresee that a customer might slip on a banana peel.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:22.747986+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 639, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.125", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "B", "picked": "B", "sampled": "B", "options": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:22.748042+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 640, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.83", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A husband and a wife, walking on a country road, were frightened by a bull running loose on the road. They climbed over a fence to get onto the adjacent property, owned by the neighbor. After climbing over the fence, the husband and wife damaged some of the neighbor's plants which were near the fence. The fence was posted with a large sign, \"No Trespassing. \"The neighbor saw the husband and the wife and came toward them with his large watchdog on a long leash. The dog rushed at the wife. The neighbor had intended only to frighten the husband and the wife, but the leash broke, and before the neighbor could restrain the dog, the dog bit the wife. If the wife asserts a claim based on battery against the neighbor, will she prevail?\nA. Yes, because the neighbor intended that the dog frighten the wife.\nB. Yes, because the breaking of the leash establishes liability under res ipsa loquitur.\nC. No, because the wife made an unauthorized entry on the neighbor's land.\nD. No, because the neighbor did not intend to cause any harmful contact with the wife.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:22.756695+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 641, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.83", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "A", "picked": "A", "sampled": "A", "options": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:22.756744+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 642, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.329", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A motorist arranged to borrow his friend's car to drive for one day while the motorist's car was being repaired. The friend knew that the brakes on his car were faulty and might fail in an emergency. The friend forgot to tell the motorist about the brakes when the motorist picked up the car, but the friend did telephone the motorist's wife and told her about them. The wife, however, forgot to tell the motorist. The motorist was driving the friend's car at a reasonable rate of speed and within the posted speed limit with the motorist's wife as a passenger. Another car, driven by a woman, crossed in front of the motorist at an intersection and in violation of the traffic signal. The motorist tried to stop, but the brakes failed, and the two cars collided. If the brakes had been in proper working order, the motorist could have stopped in time to avoid the collision. The motorist and his wife were injured. If the motorist asserts a claim against the friend, will the motorist prevail?\nA. Yes, in negligence, because the friend knew the brakes were faulty and failed to tell the motorist.\nB. Yes, in strict liability, because the car was defective, and the friend lent it to the motorist.\nC. No, because the friend was a gratuitous lender, and thus his duty of care was slight.\nD. No, because the failure of the motorist's wife to tell the motorist about the brakes was the cause in fact of the motorist's harm.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:22.884284+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 643, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.329", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "A", "picked": "A", "sampled": "A", "options": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:22.884366+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 644, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.330", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A college student purchased a large bottle of No-Flake dandruff shampoo, manufactured by a shampoo company. The box containing the bottle stated in part: \"CAUTION - Use only one capful at most once a day. Greater use may cause severe damage to the scalp. \" The college student read the writing on the box, removed the bottle, and threw the box away. The college student's roommate asked to use the No-Flake, and college student said, \"Be careful not to use too much. \" The roommate thereafter used No-Flake twice a day, applying two or three capfuls each time, notwithstanding the label statement that read: \"Use no more than one capful per day. See box instructions. \" The more he used No-Flake, the more inflamed his scalp became, the more it itched, and the more he used. After three weeks of such use, the roommate finally consulted a doctor who diagnosed his problem as a serious and irreversible case of dermatitis caused by excessive exposure to the active ingredients by No-Flake. These ingredients are uniquely effective at controlling dandruff, but there is no way to remove a remote risk to a small percentage of persons who may contract dermatitis as the result of applying, for prolonged periods of time, amounts of No-Flake substantially in excess of the directions. This jurisdiction adheres to the traditional common law rules pertaining to contributory negligence and assumption of risk. The roommate asserts a claim for his injuries against the shampoo company based on strict liability in tort. Three important facts were established at trial: The roommate misused the No-Flake shampoo, the roommate was contributorily negligent in continuing to use No-Flake shampoo when his scalp began to hurt and itch, and the roommate was a remote user and not in privity with the shampoo company. Which of the following would constitute a defense for the shampoo company?\nA. The roommate misused the No-Flake shampoo.\nB. The roommate misused the shampoo and was contributorily negligent in continuing to use No-Flake shampoo when his scalp began to hurt and itch.\nC. The roommate was not in privity with the shampoo company.\nD. The product was substantially changed from the condition in which it was sold.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:22.951651+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 645, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.330", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "D", "picked": null, "sampled": "B", "options": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:22.951687+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 646, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.172", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A trucking company employed nine salaried dispatchers to ensure that its truck fleet operated according to schedule. Two years ago, as a cost-saving measure, the company reduced the number of dispatchers to six, and each of the remaining dispatchers had to work substantially longer hours. One of the remaining dispatchers complained to his supervisor that the stress and fatigue associated with the new working conditions were too much for him to handle. The supervisor told the dispatcher that he should quit if he couldn't handle the increased hours. Over the next three months, the dispatcher continued to complain about the working conditions, to no effect. The dispatcher suffered severe emotional distress from the working conditions, but no physical injury. He eventually was hospitalized and had to miss several months of work as a result of the emotional distress. The dispatcher sued the trucking company for negligence. The company has moved for summary judgment, based on the undisputed facts set out above. Assume that there is no applicable workers' compensation statute. How should the court rule on the motion?\nA. Deny the motion, because the jury must determine the extent of the emotional distress suffered by the dispatcher.\nB. Deny the motion, because there is evidence from which a jury could reasonably conclude that the supervisor failed to act with ordinary care.\nC. Grant the motion, because the dispatcher suffered no physical injury.\nD. Grant the motion, because there is no evidence from which a jury could reasonably conclude that the supervisor acted carelessly with respect to the dispatcher's emotional well-being.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:23.046827+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 647, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.172", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "C", "picked": null, "sampled": "B", "options": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:23.046867+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 648, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.339", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "In 1986, a cement company constructed a plant for manufacturing ready-mix concrete in rural area. At the time, the company was using bagged cement, which caused little or no dust. In 2000, the plaintiff bought a home approximately 1,800 feet from the cement plant. One year ago, the cement company stopped using bagged cement and began to receive cement in bulk shipments. Since then, at least five truckloads of cement have passed the plaintiff's house daily. Cement blows off the trucks and into the plaintiff's house. When the cement arrives at the cement plant, it is blown by forced air from the trucks into the storage bin. As a consequence cement dust fills the air surrounding the plant to a distance of 2,000 feet. The plaintiff's house is the only residence within 2,000 feet of the plant. If the plaintiff asserts a claim against the cement company based on nuisance, will the plaintiff prevail?\nA. Yes, because using bagged cement would substantially increase the cement company's costs.\nB. Yes, because the cement dust interfered unreasonably with the use and enjoyment of the plaintiff's property.\nC. No, because the cement company is not required to change its industrial methods to accommodate the needs of one individual.\nD. No, because the cement company's methods are in conformity with those in general use in the industry.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:23.249293+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 649, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.339", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "B", "picked": "B", "sampled": "B", "options": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:23.249355+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 650, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.81", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A schizophrenic patient who was institutionalized in a psychiatric facility pushed a nurse down a stairwell at the facility. The nurse, a paid employee of the facility who was trained to care for schizophrenic patients, was injured. The patient is an indigent whose care is paid for by the government. The jurisdiction generally follows the rule that a person with a mental deficiency is held to the standard of a reasonable person. In a negligence action brought by the nurse against the patient, the patient's lawyer will argue that the patient should not be held responsible for the nurse's injury. Which of the following facts will be LEAST helpful to the patient's lawyer's argument?\nA. The nurse was a professional caregiver.\nB. The nurse was trained to care for patients with schizophrenia.\nC. At the time she pushed the nurse, the patient thought she was being attacked by an elephant.\nD. The patient is an indigent whose care is paid for by the government.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:23.299877+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 651, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.81", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "D", "picked": null, "sampled": "A", "options": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:23.299911+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 652, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.174", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A child was bitten by a dog while playing in a fenced-in common area of an apartment complex owned by a landlord. The child was the guest of a tenant living in the complex, and the dog was owned by another tenant. The owner of the dog knew that the dog had a propensity to bite, but the landlord did not have any notice of the dog's vicious propensities. In an action by the child against the landlord, will the child be likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because in these circumstances a landlord is strictly liable.\nB. Yes, because a landlord's duty to protect a tenant's guests from dangerous conditions is nondelegable.\nC. No, because the landlord did not have notice of the dog's vicious propensities.\nD. No, because a landlord owes no duty to a tenant's guests.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:23.311763+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 653, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.174", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "C", "picked": "C", "sampled": "C", "options": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:23.311800+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 654, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.69", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "An ordinance in a small town required all restaurants to designate smoking and nonsmoking sections for their customers. A cigarette smoker and a nonsmoker were seated at adjoining tables in a small restaurant. The smoker's table was in the smoking section, and the nonsmoker's table was in the nonsmoking section. When the smoker lit a cigarette, the nonsmoker politely requested that he not smoke, explaining that she had a severe allergy to cigarette smoke. The smoker ignored the nonsmoker's request and continued to smoke. As a result, the nonsmoker was hospitalized with a severe allergic reaction to the smoke. The nonsmoker brought a battery action against the smoker. Which of the following questions will NOT be an issue in the battery action?\nA. Did the smoker intend to cause the nonsmoker's contact with the cigarette smoke?\nB. Does smoke have the physical properties necessary for making the kind of contact required for battery?\nC. Is contact with cigarette smoke from a lawful smoking section in a restaurant the kind of contact one musture as a voluntary restaurant patron?\nD. Was the smoker's conduct unreasonable under the circumstances?\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:23.334253+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 655, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.69", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "D", "picked": null, "sampled": "B", "options": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:23.334292+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 656, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.170", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "At a country auction, a plaintiff acquired an antique cabinet that he recognized as an extremely rare and valuable collector's item. Unfortunately, the plaintiff's cabinet had several coats of varnish and paint over the original oil finish. Its potential value could only be realized if these layers could be removed without damaging the original finish. Much of the value of the cabinet depends on the condition of a unique oil finish, the secret of which died with the original inventor. A professional restorer of antique furniture recommended that the plaintiff use a specific paint stripper to remove the paint and varnish from the cabinet. The plaintiff obtained and read a sales brochure published by the company who manufactures the paint stripper, which contained the following statement: \"This product will renew all antique furniture. Will not damage original oil finishes. \"The plaintiff purchased the paint stripper and used it on his cabinet, being very careful to follow the accompanying instructions exactly. Despite the plaintiff's care, the original finish of the cabinet was irreparably damaged. When finally refinished, the cabinet was worth less than 20% of what it would have been worth if the original finish had been preserved. No other removal technique could have preserved the original finish. If the plaintiff sues the manufacturer to recover the loss he has suffered as a result of the destruction of the cabinet's original finish, will the plaintiff prevail?\nA. Yes, because no other known removal technique would have preserved the original finish.\nB. Yes, because the loss would not have occurred had the statement in the brochure been true.\nC. No, because the product was not defective when sold by the manufacturer.\nD. No, because the product was not dangerous to persons.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:23.557027+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 657, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.170", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "B", "picked": "B", "sampled": "B", "options": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:23.557077+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 658, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.287", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A man owned a much-loved cat, worth about $25, that frequently trespassed on a neighbor's property. The neighbor repeatedly asked the man to keep the cat on his own property, but the trespasses did not diminish. Aware of the man's long-standing attachment to the cat, the neighbor killed the cat with a shotgun in full view of the man. As a consequence, the man suffered great emotional distress. In an action by the man against the neighbor, which of the following claims would be likely to result in the greatest monetary recovery?\nA. Battery.\nB. Intentional infliction of emotional distress.\nC. Trespass to a chattel.\nD. Conversion.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:23.568434+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 659, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.287", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "B", "picked": "B", "sampled": "B", "options": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:23.568475+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 660, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.274", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A graduate student who was moving needed cardboard boxes, so she went to her usual grocery store to look for some. The store regularly gave repeat customers empty boxes to promote goodwill. Seeing no boxes outside, the student entered the store and asked a store employee for help. The employee pointed toward the rear of the store and said that all the empty boxes were in the storeroom. The student went into the storeroom through a door with a sign that said: \"Keep Out. Employees Only. \" While in the storeroom, she tripped on a fold in a floor mat and fell into a stack of wooden crates. The topmost crate fell on the student, causing a head injury. The student has sued the store to recover for her injury. Which statement below is the most appropriate characterization of the student and her conduct under traditional common law rules?\nA. The student assumed the risk, because she knew that the storeroom was not normally accessible to the public.\nB. The student was a licensee in the store, because she had no intention of making a purchase at the store during the box-hunting visit.\nC. The student was a trespasser in the storeroom, because she ignored the sign on the door barring entrance to the storeroom.\nD. The student was an invitee in the storeroom, because she had permission to enter the storeroom consistent with the store's policy of making its empty boxes available to repeat customers.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:23.627740+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 661, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.274", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "D", "picked": null, "sampled": "C", "options": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:23.627785+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 662, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.194", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A man who was visiting a shooting range misunderstood a signal that indicated shooting in progress and walked in front of another customer who was shooting toward a target. The man was hit by a bullet and seriously injured. The man sued the customer, the owner of the range, and the manufacturer of the signaling apparatus. The jurisdiction prohibits a plaintiff from recovering against a defendant whose fault is less than or equal to that of the plaintiff. If the jury determines that the man was 25% responsible and that each defendant was also 25% responsible, will the man be able to recover damages, and if so, how much from each defendant?\nA. The man will be able to recover 25% of his damages from each defendant.\nB. The man will be able to recover 25% of his damages from the customer but nothing from the owner or the manufacturer.\nC. The man will be able to recover 75% of his damages from any defendant.\nD. The man will not be able to recover damages.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:23.709234+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 663, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.194", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "D", "picked": null, "sampled": "B", "options": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:23.709295+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 664, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.19", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A lender met an individual who had borrowed money from him on the street, demanded that the borrower pay a debt owed to him, and threatened to punch the borrower in the nose. A fight ensued between them. A man came upon the scene just as the lender was about to kick the borrower in the head. Noting that the lender was getting the better of the fight, the man pointed a gun at him and said, \"Stop, or I'll shoot. \" If the lender asserts a claim against the man based on assault, will he prevail?\nA. Yes, because the man threatened to use deadly force.\nB. Yes, because the man was related to the borrower.\nC. No, because it was apparent that the lender was about to inflict serious bodily harm upon the borrower.\nD. No, because the lender was the original aggressor by threatening the borrower with a battery.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:23.772326+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 665, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.19", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "C", "picked": null, "sampled": "D", "options": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:23.772418+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 666, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.208", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A company set up a website for the advertisement of goods and services offered by individuals, as well as other public notices. One of the notices on the site announced that the furnishings in a home at a specified address were free for the taking. Within a few hours of the posting, all the furnishings had been taken. The notice had been placed by the homeowner's cousin without the homeowner's knowledge. The cousin bore a grudge against the homeowner and had placed the notice while the homeowner was away and had left the door to the home unlocked. In a negligence action brought by the homeowner against the company, what will be the company's strongest defense?\nA. The company had no duty to the homeowner.\nB. The cousin's actions were a proximate cause of the homeowner's loss.\nC. The First Amendment prohibits all tort actions based upon mere speech.\nD. There is no evidence of careless conduct by the company.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:24.053046+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 667, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.208", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "A", "picked": null, "sampled": "D", "options": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:24.053088+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 668, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.136", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A buyer wanted to purchase a used motor vehicle. The used car lot of a car company, in a remote section away from town, was enclosed by a 10-foot chain link fence. While the buyer and a sales representative of the car company were in the used car lot looking at cars, a security guard locked the gate at 1:30 p. m. , because it was Saturday and the lot was supposed to be closed after 1:00 p. m. Saturday until Monday morning. At 1:45 p. m. the buyer and the sales representative discovered they were locked in. There was no traffic in the vicinity and no way in which help could be summoned. The sales representative decided to wait in a car until help should come. After two hours, the buyer began to panic at the prospect of remaining undiscovered and without food and water until Monday morning. After finding no other way out of the lot, the buyer tried to climb over the fence. In doing so, he fell and was injured. The buyer asserts a claim against the car company for damages for his injuries. If the buyer's claim is based on negligence, is the defense of assumption of the risk applicable?\nA. Yes, because a reasonable person would have recognized that there was some risk of falling while climbing the fence.\nB. Yes, because the sales representative, as the car company's agent, waited for help.\nC. No, because it appeared that there was no other practicable way of getting out of the lot before Monday.\nD. No, because the buyer was confined as the result of a volitional act.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:24.058174+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 669, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.136", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "C", "picked": "C", "sampled": "C", "options": ["C"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:24.058223+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 670, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.44", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "Two lawyers work as partners in a small town that has only one other lawyer in it. The partners do a substantial amount of personal injury work. A client was severely and permanently injured in an automobile collision. The client employed the partners to represent her in obtaining damages from the motorist for her injuries. At the time she employed the partners, the statute of limitations on her claim had six weeks to run. The complaint was prepared but not filed. Each partner thought that the other partner would file the complaint. The statute of limitations ran on the client's claim against the motorist. The client has filed suit against the partners for negligence. That case is on trial with a jury in a court of general jurisdiction. In addition to proving that the partners were negligent, the client must establish, as a minimum, that she\nA. would have, but for her lawyers' negligence, recovered from the motorist.\nB. had a good faith claim against the motorist that was lost by her lawyers' negligence.\nC. was severely and permanently injured when struck by the motorist's automobile.\nD. did not negligently contribute to the failure to have the complaint filed.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:24.070422+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 671, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.44", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "A", "picked": null, "sampled": "B", "options": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:24.070466+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 672, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.55", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A company operated an installation for distributing sand and gravel. The installation was adjacent to a residential area. On the company's grounds, there was a chute with polished metal sides for loading sand and gravel into trucks. The trucks being loaded stopped on the public street below the chute. After closing hours, a plywood screen was placed in the chute and the ladder used for inspection was removed to another section of the installation. For several months, however, a number of children, eight to 10 years of age, had been playing on the company's property and the adjoining street after closing hours and had discovered the chute could be used as a slide. The company knew of this activity. One evening, as children were playing in the chute, a commuter driving by the chute hit an eight-year-old boy who slid down in front of the automobile. The commuter applied her brakes, but they suddenly failed, and she hit and injured the child. The commuter saw the child in time to have avoided hitting him if her brakes had worked properly. Two days earlier, the commuter had taken her car to a mechanic to have her brakes inspected, and the mechanic had told her that the brakes were in perfect condition. Claims were asserted on behalf of the child by his proper legal representative against the company, the commuter, and the mechanic. With respect to the child's claim against the commuter, the commuter's best defense is that\nA. her conduct was not the cause in fact of the harm.\nB. she used reasonable care in the maintenance of her brakes.\nC. she could not reasonably foresee the child's presence in the street.\nD. she did not act willfully and wantonly.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:24.124558+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 673, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.55", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "B", "picked": null, "sampled": "A", "options": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:24.124619+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 674, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.26", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A law student rented a furnished apartment. His landlord began to solicit his advice about her legal affairs, but he refused to provide it. The landlord then demanded that he vacate the apartment immediately. The landlord also began engaging in a pattern of harassment, calling the student at home every evening and entering his apartment without his consent during times when he was at school. During these unauthorized visits, she removed the handles from the bathroom and kitchen faucets, making the faucets unusable, but she did not touch any personal property belonging to the student. The lease has a year to run, and the student is still living in the apartment. The student has sued the landlord for trespass. Is he likely to prevail?\nA. No, because he has no standing to sue for trespass.\nB. No, because the landlord caused no damage to his property.\nC. Yes, for compensatory damages only.\nD. Yes, for injunctive relief, compensatory damages, and punitive damages.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:24.340088+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 675, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.26", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "D", "picked": "D", "sampled": "D", "options": ["D"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:24.340129+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 676, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.137", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A defendant has a small trampoline in his backyard which, as he knows, is commonly used by neighbor children as well as his own. The trampoline is in good condition, is not defective in any way, and normally is surrounded by mats to prevent injury if a user should fall off. Prior to leaving with his family for the day, the defendant leaned the trampoline up against the side of the house and placed the mats in the garage. While the defendant and his family were away, the plaintiff, aged 11, a new boy in the neighborhood, wandered into the defendant's yard and saw the trampoline. The plaintiff had not previously been aware of its presence, but, having frequently used a trampoline before, he decided to set it up, and started to jump. He lost his balance on one jump and took a hard fall on the bare ground, suffering a serious injury that would have been prevented by the mats. An action has been brought against the defendant on the plaintiff's behalf to recover damages for the injuries the plaintiff sustained from his fall. In this jurisdiction, the traditional common-law rules pertaining to contributory negligence have been replaced by a pure comparative negligence rule. In his action against the defendant, will the plaintiff prevail?\nA. No, because children likely to be attracted by the trampoline would normally realize the risk of using it without mats.\nB. No, because the plaintiff failed to exercise reasonable care commensurate with his age, intelligence, and experience.\nC. No, because the plaintiff entered the defendant's yard and used the trampoline without the defendant's permission.\nD. No, because the plaintiff did not know about the trampoline before entering the defendant's yard and thus was not \"lured\" onto the premises.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["B"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:24.340427+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 677, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.137", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": false, "expected": "A", "picked": null, "sampled": "B", "options": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:24.340452+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 678, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.45", "type": "sampling", "data": {"prompt": [{"role": "system", "content": "The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about United States tort law."}, {"role": "system", "content": "A landscaping company hired a worker to drive between various job sites. The worker used his personal vehicle, but the company provided equipment for transporting landscaping materials. The company paid the worker for travel between job sites, but not for commuting to and from work. The company asked the worker if he had a valid driver's license before hiring him. The worker claimed he did, but his license had been suspended due to multiple traffic violations. The company did not verify the worker's claim. One day, while driving to work, the worker caused an accident, injuring another driver. In a lawsuit against the landscaping company based on negligent hiring, is the injured driver likely to succeed?\nA. Yes, because the company provided equipment for the worker's vehicle.\nB. Yes, because the company had a duty to verify the worker's driver's license status.\nC. No, because the worker was an independent contractor.\nD. No, because the company's duty to use reasonable care in hiring a competent driver extended only to actions taken by the worker in the scope of his employment.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "D", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A factory producing hazardous materials was situated near a residential area. The factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care in handling and storing the hazardous materials. However, the storage of these materials posed a foreseeable and significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was taken. Despite the factory's adherence to safety protocols, a chemical leak occurred, causing illness among nearby residents. No state or federal statutes address the factory's liability. In a lawsuit by an affected resident against the factory, is the resident likely to prevail?\nA. Yes, because the storage of hazardous materials near a residential area created a significant risk of harm even when reasonable care was exercised.\nB. Yes, because the factory is strictly liable for any harm caused by the hazardous materials it produced.\nC. No, because the factory followed all applicable government regulations and exercised reasonable care.\nD. No, because the factory used proper safety protocols in handling and storing the hazardous materials.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A pedestrian was walking on a sidewalk when a cyclist, who was riding on the sidewalk, approached from behind. A nearby person, believing the pedestrian was in danger of being hit by the cyclist, grabbed the pedestrian and pulled them out of the cyclist's path. The pedestrian fell and suffered a broken arm. In reality, the cyclist was obviously slowing down and would have stopped before reaching the pedestrian. In a lawsuit for battery brought by the pedestrian against the person who pulled them, will the pedestrian prevail?\nA. Yes, because the person could have warned the pedestrian instead of physically pulling them.\nB. Yes, because the pedestrian was not actually in danger and the person should have realized it.\nC. No, because the cyclist was responsible for the pedestrian's injury.\nD. No, because the person's intent was to protect the pedestrian, not to harm them.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "B", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "system", "content": "During a heavy storm, a sailor feared his boat would sink and decided to dock at a nearby private pier marked with \"NO TRESPASSING\" signs. The owner of the pier confronted the sailor and demanded he remove his boat. The sailor offered to pay for the use of the pier, but the owner refused and pushed the boat back into the water, resulting in the boat being lost at sea. Is the sailor likely to prevail in a lawsuit against the owner to recover the value of the boat?\nA. Yes, because the sailor was privileged to enter the owner's property to save his boat.\nB. Yes, because the sailor offered to pay the owner for the use of the pier.\nC. No, because the owner warned the sailor that he could not dock at the pier.\nD. No, because there was a chance the boat would not have been damaged by the storm.\nAnswer:", "name": "example_user"}, {"role": "system", "content": "A", "name": "example_assistant"}, {"role": "user", "content": "A car driven by the defendant entered land owned by and in the possession of the plaintiff, without the plaintiff's permission. Which, if any, of the following allegations, without additional facts, would provide a sufficient basis for a claim by the plaintiff against the defendant?\nA. The defendant intentionally drove his car onto the plaintiff's land.\nB. The defendant's car damaged the plaintiff's land.\nC. The defendant negligently drove his car onto the plaintiff's land.\nD. The defendant's car damaged the plaintiff's personal property.\nAnswer:"}], "sampled": ["A and B. \n\nOption A provides a basis for a claim of intentional trespass, which occurs when someone intentionally enters another person's property without permission. \n\nOption B provides a basis for a claim of trespass to land, which occurs when someone enters another person's property without permission and causes damage to the property. \n\nOption C, negligence, does not provide a basis for a claim of trespass, as trespass requires intentional or knowing entry onto another's property. \n\nOption D, damage to personal property, does not provide a basis for a claim of trespass to land, as it involves damage to personal property rather than damage to the land itself."]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:24.830520+00:00"}
-{"run_id": "230420175656F24QLG5A", "event_id": 679, "sample_id": "us-tort-law.dev.45", "type": "match", "data": {"correct": true, "expected": "A", "picked": "A", "sampled": "A and B. \n\nOption A provides a basis for a claim of intentional trespass, which occurs when someone intentionally enters another person's property without permission. \n\nOption B provides a basis for a claim of trespass to land, which occurs when someone enters another person's property without permission and causes damage to the property. \n\nOption C, negligence, does not provide a basis for a claim of trespass, as trespass requires intentional or knowing entry onto another's property. \n\nOption D, damage to personal property, does not provide a basis for a claim of trespass to land, as it involves damage to personal property rather than damage to the land itself.", "options": ["A"]}, "created_by": "", "created_at": "2023-04-20 17:57:24.830606+00:00"}
diff --git a/frontend/src/App.svelte b/frontend/src/App.svelte
index 9222c4a696d29f51bb721181989b1844a17612b2..fd1a73a5ea9ae2912cca29b98b5b0933dfaf0f1f 100644
--- a/frontend/src/App.svelte
+++ b/frontend/src/App.svelte
@@ -43,6 +43,7 @@
         <thead>
           <tr>
             <th>evaluation</th>
+            <th>description</th>
             <th>models</th>
             <th>accuracy</th>
             <th>instances</th>
@@ -59,14 +60,15 @@
                 <td
                   ><a href={d[name]["link"]}><span class="name-wrap">{name}</span></a>
                 </td>
-                <td>
+                <td>{d[name]["description"]}</td>
+                <td style:min-width="120px">
                   {#each d[name]["models"] as m}{m}<br />{/each}
                 </td>
                 <td>
                   {#each d[name]["accuracy"] as a}{a.toFixed(2)}%<br />{/each}
                 </td>
                 <td>
-                  {#each d[name]["events"] as e}{e}<br />{/each}
+                  {d[name]["events"][0]}
                 </td>
                 <td>
                   <Button
@@ -100,7 +102,8 @@
     justify-content: center;
   }
   #table-background {
-    width: 900px;
+    width: 1100px;
+    min-width: 900px;
     padding: 20px;
     border-radius: 20px;
   }
diff --git a/zeno-evals-hub/frontend/index.html b/zeno-evals-hub/frontend/index.html
index 172e81905ae14fddd007275cdb47ce9c26ffed8f..f2e136cac847b4403e4cfa7ddd7aa6146a9e8090 100644
--- a/zeno-evals-hub/frontend/index.html
+++ b/zeno-evals-hub/frontend/index.html
@@ -19,12 +19,12 @@
     />
     <!-- Roboto Mono -->
     <link rel="stylesheet" href="https://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Roboto+Mono" />
-    <link rel="stylesheet" href="./build/assets/main-a4e88c77.css" />
+    <!-- <link rel="stylesheet" href="./build/assets/main-a4e88c77.css" /> -->
   </head>
   <body>
     <div id="app"></div>
-    <!-- <script type="module" src="http://localhost:5173/src/main.ts"></script> -->
-    <script type="module" src="./build/assets/main-686621b6.js"></script>
+    <script type="module" src="http://localhost:5173/src/main.ts"></script>
+    <!-- <script type="module" src="./build/assets/main-686621b6.js"></script> -->
   </body>
 </html>
 <style>
diff --git a/zeno-evals-hub/main.py b/zeno-evals-hub/main.py
index bb3ed5621a63ee93423f24809634edf47a2368c5..85973af25ed700da00d975fa6e017043e7130162 100644
--- a/zeno-evals-hub/main.py
+++ b/zeno-evals-hub/main.py
@@ -64,6 +64,7 @@ def command_line():
         params["accuracy"] = [res_spec["accuracy"]]
         params["events"] = [res_spec["events"]]
         params["link"] = [params["link"]]
+        params["description"] = [params["description"]]
 
         if second_exists:
             sec_res_spec = prepare_spec(params["second-results-file"])
@@ -81,6 +82,7 @@ def command_line():
         config.serve = False
         config.cache_path = "./.zeno_cache_" + name
         config.multiprocessing = False
+        config.batch_size = 2000
         port_arg = os.getenv("PORT")
         if port_arg is not None:
             config.editable = False