Wrong Licenses

#17
by jaymueller - opened

Hi @Djrango , this a really cool exploration into the model!

However, please update the license for the FLUX-model: Since this is a derivative of the FLUX.1 [dev] model the FLUX.1 [dev] Non-Commercial License applies to it.

The next part is just my personal understanding, do with this what you want: I think you might also be in breach of the Qwen2-VL license (Apache 2.0). You should probably also indicate this license for the relevant parts.

Thanks for the understanding.

Interesting, but according to Flux.1 Dev license file:

For clarity, use for revenue-generating activity or direct interactions with or impacts on end users, or use to train, fine tune or distill other models for commercial use is not a Non-Commercial purpose.

I am wondering is this a case of "train, fine tune or distill other models for commercial use"? The model user release the checkpoints under MIT license, seems not a case of "training for commercial use". But I am not a professional of law, just want to check whether this model is free for commercial use.

i too am curious about the license issue, if this is using the shnell version or whatever its called then it should be fine, but if it really is the dev version, its essentially useless to me and many others

Sign up or log in to comment