|
--- |
|
datasets: |
|
- alaleye/aloresb |
|
metrics: |
|
- wer |
|
pipeline_tag: automatic-speech-recognition |
|
--- |
|
|
|
# Wav2vec2-Bert-Fongbe |
|
|
|
This model is a fine-tuned version of [facebook/w2v-bert-2.0](https://arxiv.org/abs/2108.06209). This has a WER of 24.20 on [Aloresb dataset](https://huggingface.co/datasets/alaleye/aloresb), fongbe language. |
|
|
|
## Model description |
|
This model is a fine-tuned version of the wav2vec2-BERT architecture on the AlorésB dataset for the Fongbe language. Fongbe, a Gbe language, is predominantly spoken in the southern region of Benin. The model has been fine-tuned specifically for Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) tasks in this language. |
|
It can be useful for transcription services, research, and linguistic studies involving Fongbe. |
|
|
|
### Details |
|
|
|
* Model Name: wav2vec2-bert-fongbe |
|
* Base Model: facebook/w2v-bert-2.0 |
|
* Fine-tuned on: Aloresb dataset |
|
* Languages: Fongbe |
|
* Architecture: Wav2vec2 + BERT |
|
* Fine-tuning Dataset: Aloresb (Fongbe) |
|
|
|
### How to use |
|
|
|
``` |
|
import torch |
|
import soundfile as sf |
|
from transformers import AutoModelForCTC, Wav2Vec2BertProcessor |
|
|
|
model_name = "OctaSpace/wav2vec2-bert-fongbe" |
|
|
|
asr_model = AutoModelForCTC.from_pretrained(model_name).to(device) |
|
processor = Wav2Vec2BertProcessor.from_pretrained(model_name) |
|
|
|
audio_input, _ = sf.read(file) |
|
|
|
inputs = processor([audio_input], sampling_rate=16_000).input_features |
|
features = torch.tensor(inputs) |
|
|
|
with torch.no_grad(): |
|
logits = asr_model(features).logits |
|
|
|
predicted_ids = torch.argmax(logits, dim=-1) |
|
predictions = processor.batch_decode(predicted_ids, skip_special_tokens=True) |
|
|
|
``` |
|
|
|
### Training Procedure |
|
|
|
The model was fine-tuned on the Aloresb dataset, which contains audio recordings and transcriptions in Fongbe. |
|
|
|
### Training Parameters: |
|
|
|
Optimizer: AdamW |
|
Learning Rate: 3e-5 |
|
Batch Size: 3 |
|
Epochs: 3 |
|
Evaluation Results |
|
The model was evaluated using the Word Error Rate (WER) metric on a test set. Here are the results: |
|
|
|
WER: 24.20% |