archived
stringclasses 2
values | author
stringlengths 3
20
| author_fullname
stringlengths 4
12
⌀ | body
stringlengths 0
22.5k
| comment_type
stringclasses 1
value | controversiality
stringclasses 2
values | created_utc
stringlengths 10
10
| edited
stringlengths 4
12
| gilded
stringclasses 7
values | id
stringlengths 1
7
| link_id
stringlengths 7
10
| locked
stringclasses 2
values | name
stringlengths 4
10
⌀ | parent_id
stringlengths 5
10
| permalink
stringlengths 41
91
⌀ | retrieved_on
stringlengths 10
10
⌀ | score
stringlengths 1
4
| subreddit_id
stringclasses 1
value | subreddit_name_prefixed
stringclasses 1
value | subreddit_type
stringclasses 1
value | total_awards_received
stringclasses 19
values |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
False | [deleted] | None | Yes. That's true of his original post where it seemed the only issues we ethics and/or possible lack thereof. Patent ownership & cost of applying for parents came up in some of the subsequent comments. | null | 0 | 1543648165 | False | 0 | eauams1 | t3_a1tazn | null | null | t1_eaua45t | /r/programming/comments/a1tazn/company_google_tried_to_patent_my_work_after_a/eauams1/ | 1546269740 | 1 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | GoodAthlete | t2_26i6zzrd | Or Pascal | null | 0 | 1544779163 | False | 0 | ebrb0gl | t3_a5ylm8 | null | null | t1_ebqmgs6 | /r/programming/comments/a5ylm8/should_have_used_ada_1_how_some_famous/ebrb0gl/ | 1547589940 | 3 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | _Magic_Man_ | t2_govhx | 👏👏 | null | 0 | 1543648656 | False | 0 | eauaxi4 | t3_a1ysx2 | null | null | t3_a1ysx2 | /r/programming/comments/a1ysx2/hacker_hijacks_50000_printers_with_pret_to_tell/eauaxi4/ | 1546269872 | 73 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | swoleherb | t2_tplfukw | use a pure css framework like bulma then | null | 0 | 1544779209 | False | 0 | ebrb1dy | t3_a5zjwu | null | null | t1_ebr5b5f | /r/programming/comments/a5zjwu/bootstrap_340_released/ebrb1dy/ | 1547589951 | 8 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | G00dAndPl3nty | t2_wcwq6 | Yeah, but SQL server somehow forgot to implement CSV import. And no, it doesn't actually exist, only a terrible terrible hack in its place | null | 0 | 1543648957 | False | 0 | eaub3sp | t3_a18ich | null | null | t1_eanza6f | /r/programming/comments/a18ich/how_postgres_is_more_than_a_relational_database/eaub3sp/ | 1546269950 | 0 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | iopq | t2_6dowm | Maybe the file is several gigabytes long and you just want the last bit. It's not about the performance of cat, it's about not reading the whole file | null | 0 | 1544779215 | False | 0 | ebrb1ie | t3_a5sg9k | null | null | t1_ebp5b0e | /r/programming/comments/a5sg9k/how_unix_programmers_at_restaurants_search_menus/ebrb1ie/ | 1547589953 | 1 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | pure_x01 | t2_3h5id | Agree but now it's time to change. I'm pretty sure that if flutter changed to kotlin its userbase would atleast double in a short time . All android kotlin developers would come running. Flutter is an excellent idea. | null | 0 | 1543649016 | False | 0 | eaub505 | t3_9zpn0h | null | null | t1_eatz8kk | /r/programming/comments/9zpn0h/flutter_the_good_the_bad_and_the_ugly/eaub505/ | 1546269964 | 1 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | ahsansaeed067 | t2_v8rwoio | Great work... | null | 0 | 1544779303 | False | 0 | ebrb35u | t3_a61to1 | null | null | t3_a61to1 | /r/programming/comments/a61to1/write_your_own_virtual_machine/ebrb35u/ | 1547589973 | 2 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | BigFatMonads | t2_2k91bbh5 | Why exactly do you think this subreddit is the best place for your "Java Tutorial For Beginners"? | null | 1 | 1543649075 | False | 0 | eaub67o | t3_a20i1c | null | null | t3_a20i1c | /r/programming/comments/a20i1c/abstract_class_vs_interface_in_java_with_examples/eaub67o/ | 1546269979 | 3 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | throwawaysonlyalways | t2_l3ulc | This guy architects. | null | 0 | 1544779403 | False | 0 | ebrb53a | t3_a5y50c | null | null | t1_ebr9l1o | /r/programming/comments/a5y50c/why_bad_software_architecture_is_easy_to_monetize/ebrb53a/ | 1547589997 | 18 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | svenefftinge | t2_65mpk | Not like Docker but with Docker and Kubernetes. It runs entirely in the browser. | null | 0 | 1543649125 | False | 0 | eaub7ao | t3_a1v87k | null | null | t1_eat05j0 | /r/programming/comments/a1v87k/a_jsfiddle_that_works_for_any_programming/eaub7ao/ | 1546269992 | 1 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | M3ME_FR0G | t2_1075ev | The way people build buildings today is completely different to how they were built even 70 years ago. Way more different than software is today compared to what it was like 70 years ago. | null | 0 | 1544779498 | False | 0 | ebrb6uu | t3_a5ylm8 | null | null | t1_ebr3qxh | /r/programming/comments/a5ylm8/should_have_used_ada_1_how_some_famous/ebrb6uu/ | 1547590019 | -1 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | svenefftinge | t2_65mpk | You are welcome! I hope we will soon be able to add language support for Xtend to Gitpod and Theia, too. | null | 0 | 1543649171 | 1543650144 | 0 | eaub87x | t3_a1v87k | null | null | t1_eatiypt | /r/programming/comments/a1v87k/a_jsfiddle_that_works_for_any_programming/eaub87x/ | 1546270004 | 1 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | Remarkable_Button | t2_2nb0z6g7 | >9-to-5 programmer
Why specify that this person likes reasonable work hours? And don't you have any input? You're a team, aren't you. That sounds like more of a problem than this specific programmer. | null | 0 | 1544779818 | False | 0 | ebrbcxj | t3_a5y50c | null | null | t1_ebr3ukj | /r/programming/comments/a5y50c/why_bad_software_architecture_is_easy_to_monetize/ebrbcxj/ | 1547590094 | 18 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | Ameisen | t2_5qad2 | So... What do supervillains use? XML? YAML? TOML? | null | 0 | 1543649174 | False | 0 | eaub8ai | t3_a1tazn | null | null | t1_easscyz | /r/programming/comments/a1tazn/company_google_tried_to_patent_my_work_after_a/eaub8ai/ | 1546270005 | 2 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | combinatorylogic | t2_iab4d | Just another example of how confusing the term "VM" is to the laymen. | null | 0 | 1544779961 | False | 0 | ebrbfpp | t3_a61to1 | null | null | t1_ebr8cys | /r/programming/comments/a61to1/write_your_own_virtual_machine/ebrbfpp/ | 1547590128 | 27 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | alexeyr | t2_37mmv | Intersection types, not union types (even though it's a union of properties). | null | 0 | 1543649221 | False | 0 | eaub9af | t3_a1lbh8 | null | null | t1_eaqvjoa | /r/programming/comments/a1lbh8/announcing_typescript_32/eaub9af/ | 1546270017 | 2 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | Ravek | t2_72i2j | A dev who doesn’t know how basic language syntax works should just be fired. If you can’t even get this right, you can’t be trusted to do anything actually difficult either. | null | 1 | 1544780354 | False | 0 | ebrbn7y | t3_a5ylm8 | null | null | t1_ebr52i2 | /r/programming/comments/a5ylm8/should_have_used_ada_1_how_some_famous/ebrbn7y/ | 1547590250 | -3 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | AngularBeginner | t2_eky8x | OCaml is fine. | null | 0 | 1543649224 | False | 0 | eaub9ch | t3_a1o5iz | null | null | t1_eate6du | /r/programming/comments/a1o5iz/maybe_not_rich_hickey/eaub9ch/ | 1546270018 | 1 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | G00dAndPl3nty | t2_wcwq6 | What is it? | null | 0 | 1544780427 | False | 0 | ebrbol7 | t3_a5mk9z | null | null | t1_ebo8mm7 | /r/programming/comments/a5mk9z/visual_studio_code_version_130_released/ebrbol7/ | 1547590267 | 1 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | eigenman | t2_3kiki | Is any project every truly finished? | null | 0 | 1543649225 | False | 0 | eaub9dg | t3_a1we32 | null | null | t1_eau8bnv | /r/programming/comments/a1we32/i_put_words_on_this_webpage_so_you_have_to_listen/eaub9dg/ | 1546270018 | 2 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | combinatorylogic | t2_iab4d | Probably the author does not even realise it, but his analogy is also a criticism of the *agile* process. | null | 0 | 1544780441 | False | 0 | ebrbouc | t3_a5y50c | null | null | t3_a5y50c | /r/programming/comments/a5y50c/why_bad_software_architecture_is_easy_to_monetize/ebrbouc/ | 1547590270 | 2 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | eigenman | t2_3kiki | >PonyAPI
A simple API for information on episodes of My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic written in Nim to be run inside a container.
>All data is loaded into ram and there are no usage limits as long as you agree to not take down the server it is running on.
Hired. | null | 0 | 1543649405 | False | 0 | eaubd5u | t3_a1we32 | null | null | t3_a1we32 | /r/programming/comments/a1we32/i_put_words_on_this_webpage_so_you_have_to_listen/eaubd5u/ | 1546270065 | 20 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | dpash | t2_5bdkm | A non-Betterridge headline:
> after two years, I can tell you – that was a good choice for the project and my career.
Specific pain points mentioned were setup pains and missing or outdated type declarations/definitions for JS libraries.
**Edit:** clarify second pain point. | null | 0 | 1544780710 | 1544783534 | 0 | ebrbtvr | t3_a62mux | null | null | t3_a62mux | /r/programming/comments/a62mux/typescript_was_it_worth/ebrbtvr/ | 1547590332 | 13 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | ForeverAlot | t2_4yj7p | `yes` | null | 0 | 1543649842 | False | 0 | eaubm1a | t3_a1we32 | null | null | t1_eaub9dg | /r/programming/comments/a1we32/i_put_words_on_this_webpage_so_you_have_to_listen/eaubm1a/ | 1546270204 | 10 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | my_password_is______ | t2_srbgb | bob is an idiot
he should have just asked the waiter | null | 0 | 1544780732 | False | 0 | ebrbub2 | t3_a5sg9k | null | null | t3_a5sg9k | /r/programming/comments/a5sg9k/how_unix_programmers_at_restaurants_search_menus/ebrbub2/ | 1547590338 | -1 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | ivquatch | t2_3a6gu | > The Arr.sequence function above actually knows nothing about asynchronicity or continuations, it is a general purpose tool that can take a list of some monadic values and give you a monadic list of values.
The reason i think this argument falls flat with javascript programmers is because there are no typeclassish interfaces out-of-the box. There are arrays (list monad) and promises (continuation monad kinda), but there's no common monad interface as you pointed out. Also there are no Option, Either, or IO types. I'm sure someone could (and probably has) written an npm module to monkey-patch typeclass interfaces like Monad, Applicative, and Monoid onto common JS types, but AFAIK such a thing is not ubiquitous in the ecosystem the way async/await or promises are.
So while combinators like `Arr.sequence` may sound great in theory, what can JS programmers use them on right out-of-the-box without introducing another obscure library dependency? Plus culturally, I think most JS programmers would stick their fingers in their ears once you got up on your soap-box and started extolling the glory of category theory, even if you deliberately try to avoid mentioning the "M" word. Things like `Arr.sequence` are so abstract, that you can't really justify them wrt to more familiar things like async/await without going deeper down the FP rabbit hole. And by then, you're in space-burrito land.
Good article, btw. I realize I'm splashing cold water on your efforts like a lazy internet troll. People may eventually warm up to these kinds of arguments as FP idioms become more common in Javascript. There's just a little bit of a barrier that FP evangelists have yet to overcome.
| null | 0 | 1543650034 | False | 0 | eaubpw9 | t3_a1lebc | null | null | t1_earsonu | /r/programming/comments/a1lebc/actually_callbacks_are_fine_implementing_monads/eaubpw9/ | 1546270251 | 1 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | nikonino | t2_sb61r | CQRS/ES are perfect solutions but work well with certain domain models only. You need to be sure you have understood the business domain perfectly, otherwise the cost will touch the roof eventually. Currently, I have been working with CQRS/ES and I can surely say that a bad decision initially will make you suffer like nothing else! | null | 0 | 1544780797 | False | 0 | ebrbvk5 | t3_a5y50c | null | null | t1_ebrarl8 | /r/programming/comments/a5y50c/why_bad_software_architecture_is_easy_to_monetize/ebrbvk5/ | 1547590353 | 2 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | MrSqueezles | t2_20703 | This is why tech companies patent everything. Many don't troll. It's way cheaper to file thousands of patents for things you might want to do than to prove prior art for things you're already doing. | null | 0 | 1543650364 | False | 0 | eaubwip | t3_a1tazn | null | null | t1_eask7lk | /r/programming/comments/a1tazn/company_google_tried_to_patent_my_work_after_a/eaubwip/ | 1546270333 | 6 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | ahsansaeed067 | t2_v8rwoio | Install previous version of extension **Hola...** | null | 0 | 1544781080 | False | 0 | ebrc0x6 | t3_a5mk9z | null | null | t1_ebo8mm7 | /r/programming/comments/a5mk9z/visual_studio_code_version_130_released/ebrc0x6/ | 1547590420 | 1 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | skulgnome | t2_37fao | >If an array of floats will not be aligned by 4, there will a performance penalty.
This performance penalty only exists when the load group crosses a cacheline boundary and not both of them are resident. MOVAPS has been a legacy optimization since 2011, barely worth doing anymore. In particular the difference it makes is less than the difference of shuffling things back and forth from an array-of-structs form.
> I don't understand. The post literally provides an example of LLVM producing SIMD code.
Most SIMD code out of compilers doesn't fill the pipeline. And here we see the integer additions working four at a time, which is crowded out of the pipeline by this amount of loop control code executed per SIMD instruction.
Then there's considerations about how soon the data produced will be consumed again, which kills SIMD dead if you're doing fewer than 256 instances at a time. Etc, etc | null | 0 | 1543650425 | 1543652546 | 0 | eaubxrz | t3_a1roi0 | null | null | t1_eatl83o | /r/programming/comments/a1roi0/how_to_optimize_c_and_c_code_in_2018/eaubxrz/ | 1546270348 | 2 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | Eirenarch | t2_46hjd | I do concede that it is less prone to this. I however do not concede that it makes enough of a difference to affect the end result in 90% of the applications. Yes there is less data to be sent over the wire but an unreliable network would still render the app unusable. It doesn't matter if one in 3 clicks fails or 1 in 5, the user will still be annoyed and stop using the app. Also most apps do in fact make a network request for almost every UI interaction. The apps that don't are somewhat an exception like if you are building a web based word processor. In my experience the great majority of software being built is of the forms over data variety for which this approach is just as good as the React SPA one. | null | 0 | 1544781126 | False | 0 | ebrc1sl | t3_a5ssxk | null | null | t1_ebr2i1f | /r/programming/comments/a5ssxk/razor_components_for_a_javascriptfree_frontend_in/ebrc1sl/ | 1547590430 | 2 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | alexeyr | t2_37mmv | Right, which is why this was given as a counterexample to
>> you can take any static language (I'm waiting for counterproofs..) and make it dynamic by dropping the type annotations (if any) | null | 0 | 1543650471 | False | 0 | eaubymu | t3_a1lbh8 | null | null | t1_eatjj6j | /r/programming/comments/a1lbh8/announcing_typescript_32/eaubymu/ | 1546270360 | 2 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | jimmiemanningwUB | t2_1xjkzc9k | That's not a valid criticism, if Bootstrap can drop dependencies that are not strictly necessary, then it should regardless of the size of the core codebase. | null | 0 | 1544781296 | False | 0 | ebrc4xm | t3_a5zjwu | null | null | t1_ebra033 | /r/programming/comments/a5zjwu/bootstrap_340_released/ebrc4xm/ | 1547590469 | 51 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | jsalatas | t2_16ut0e | This is rather long but worth watching.
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aiKRt3-FbM0](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aiKRt3-FbM0) | null | 0 | 1543650632 | False | 0 | eauc1rb | t3_a1ywmw | null | null | t3_a1ywmw | /r/programming/comments/a1ywmw/how_to_fix_the_patent_system/eauc1rb/ | 1546270398 | 1 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | adymitruk | t2_35hrz | The opposite is true. We're just effective at building things badly very efficiently due to the amount of time spent fighting Moore's Law from the storage aspect. 10 years in of doing nothing but CQRS, anything else is slower. There is no faster way to start than with event sourcing. But you need time to realize this and unlearn a lot.
All information systems are CQRS/ES. We do a lot to throw away information and make really bad optimizations. The end result is anemic, canonical models that let cyclomatic complexity get out of control that have important accountability thrown in the trash. | null | 0 | 1544781322 | 1544781558 | 0 | ebrc5ff | t3_a5y50c | null | null | t1_ebrbvk5 | /r/programming/comments/a5y50c/why_bad_software_architecture_is_easy_to_monetize/ebrc5ff/ | 1547590475 | 1 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | Hermasetas | t2_12jn3g | I don't know if you're joking or not, but i is not an imaginary number in this context. It's simply a loop counter variable. | null | 0 | 1543650697 | False | 0 | eauc2z4 | t3_a1rp4s | null | null | t1_eatvp3v | /r/programming/comments/a1rp4s/why_is_2_i_i_faster_than_2_i_i_java/eauc2z4/ | 1546270413 | 2 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | Eirenarch | t2_46hjd | Razor Components is certainly aimed at people who hate (for some definition of hate) JS although MS would never say that publicly because they are scared there would be backlash that they are doing EEE or something. The niche created by JS haters is quite big.
Also there is no contradiction in GraphQL and Razor Components existing simultaneously. Sometimes you want to minimize network requests sometimes you don't because that internal app is running on a server in the next room. Both are valid problems to be solved. Also note that GraphQL doesn't only aim to reduce the *size* of the payload, I would even argue that this is secondary benefit. GraphQL aims to reduce the *number* of requests compared to more traditional REST. If you think about it Razor Components will also reduce the number of requests (for most apps) compared to REST endpoints although sometimes the cost will be sending more data. | null | 0 | 1544781560 | False | 0 | ebrc9vt | t3_a5ssxk | null | null | t1_ebr39yu | /r/programming/comments/a5ssxk/razor_components_for_a_javascriptfree_frontend_in/ebrc9vt/ | 1547590530 | 3 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | ivquatch | t2_3a6gu | TDD means test *driven* design. Ie. tests come before the design of the software itself. I didn't suggest TDD means you ignore software engineering fundamentals. The quote just points out that putting tests first might be misguided. | null | 0 | 1543650900 | False | 0 | eauc6wj | t3_a1o5iz | null | null | t1_easzqv2 | /r/programming/comments/a1o5iz/maybe_not_rich_hickey/eauc6wj/ | 1546270461 | 1 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | Snowtype | t2_2rwuie3t | It's more of a term to describe him as someone who's just a programmer as a means to get billable hours. But yeah, the team dynamic is terrible. | null | 0 | 1544781631 | False | 0 | ebrcb7e | t3_a5y50c | null | null | t1_ebrbcxj | /r/programming/comments/a5y50c/why_bad_software_architecture_is_easy_to_monetize/ebrcb7e/ | 1547590547 | 6 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | [deleted] | None | [removed] | null | 0 | 1543650916 | False | 0 | eauc790 | t3_a1we32 | null | null | t3_a1we32 | /r/programming/comments/a1we32/i_put_words_on_this_webpage_so_you_have_to_listen/eauc790/ | 1546270465 | 1 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | Candid_Calligrapher | t2_2nsvdulx | There's no such thing as an interpreted or compiled language. | null | 0 | 1544781713 | False | 0 | ebrccq6 | t3_a60dlr | null | null | t3_a60dlr | /r/programming/comments/a60dlr/the_difference_between_interpreted_languages_and/ebrccq6/ | 1547590566 | 11 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | Freyr90 | t2_qy7vh | > Undecidability is not a property I want in a type system ;-)
Why? There are a really few languages with decidable type system (which probably nobody use, OCaml, F*, scala, rust are all undecidable). Decidability of inference gives you nothing really, while expressiveness gives you power to encode pretty subtle invariants within your types.
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/a1o5iz/maybe_not_rich_hickey/eathiia/ | null | 0 | 1543651177 | False | 0 | eaucc8o | t3_a1o5iz | null | null | t1_eatyzdo | /r/programming/comments/a1o5iz/maybe_not_rich_hickey/eaucc8o/ | 1546270527 | 3 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | combinatorylogic | t2_iab4d | On the other hand, there are *dynamic* languages that were designed to be interpreted, making an efficient compilation nearly impossible. Colloquially such languages are often called just "interpreted" - technically incorrect, but still easy to understand what is meant. | null | 0 | 1544781837 | False | 0 | ebrcf4y | t3_a60dlr | null | null | t1_ebrccq6 | /r/programming/comments/a60dlr/the_difference_between_interpreted_languages_and/ebrcf4y/ | 1547590595 | 32 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | darkslide3000 | t2_5hk6g | The code creates an array of random bytes and then checks which are smaller than 128. You can't predict randomness, no matter how good your predictor is. (Unless you're suggesting that the predictor would learn the right answer for all 32k array entries so the outer loop can get faster after the first time the inner loop completes... but that's *way* off what current branch predictors are capable of.) | null | 0 | 1543651184 | False | 0 | eauccd2 | t3_a1rp4s | null | null | t1_easozpq | /r/programming/comments/a1rp4s/why_is_2_i_i_faster_than_2_i_i_java/eauccd2/ | 1546270528 | 2 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | roothorick | t2_4t8gg | To be fair, I don't think Ada does much about that either. | null | 0 | 1544781951 | False | 0 | ebrchhy | t3_a5ylm8 | null | null | t1_ebr95wb | /r/programming/comments/a5ylm8/should_have_used_ada_1_how_some_famous/ebrchhy/ | 1547590625 | 6 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | Freyr90 | t2_qy7vh | Why would I care? This is type, it's about what data is in and what data is out. Of course you could encode it with dependent types in F* (since types are values), but why would you? | null | 0 | 1543651294 | False | 0 | eaucehm | t3_a1o5iz | null | null | t1_eatkfch | /r/programming/comments/a1o5iz/maybe_not_rich_hickey/eaucehm/ | 1546270554 | 2 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | roothorick | t2_4t8gg | > Also I wonder if this just caused them to have 451 programming languages in use afterwards.
Considering that legacy systems written in Fortran are still uncomfortably common... I'd say odds are very good. Especially in govt, it takes a very long time for a codebase to be retired, if ever. | null | 0 | 1544782212 | False | 0 | ebrcn3c | t3_a5ylm8 | null | null | t1_ebr97eh | /r/programming/comments/a5ylm8/should_have_used_ada_1_how_some_famous/ebrcn3c/ | 1547590693 | 10 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | alexeyr | t2_37mmv | > you can take any static language (I'm waiting for counterproofs..) and make it dynamic by dropping the type annotations (if any)
Haskell typeclass resolution would be another counterexample. E.g.
maxBound == x
where the compiler makes sure types of `x` and `maxBound` are the same and `maxBound` returns the largest value of its type (so if `x` is an `Int`, `maxBound` is 2^31 - 1, and if it's an `UInt8`, `maxBound` is `255`).
I don't know any dynamic language where `maxBound` could depend on `x` in this situation.
Similarly with Scala implicits. | null | 0 | 1543651314 | False | 0 | eauceva | t3_a1lbh8 | null | null | t1_eas63ch | /r/programming/comments/a1lbh8/announcing_typescript_32/eauceva/ | 1546270560 | 1 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | Snowtype | t2_2rwuie3t | Specific suggestions? Before he joined, the entire project was using a shared library of common plain data structures (using Protobuf, since it's widely supported), so components are easy to integrate with each other. | null | 0 | 1544782226 | False | 0 | ebrcndj | t3_a5y50c | null | null | t1_ebrauq9 | /r/programming/comments/a5y50c/why_bad_software_architecture_is_easy_to_monetize/ebrcndj/ | 1547590697 | 2 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | Otis_Inf | t2_38aav | Nothing beats FlopNar Enterprise Edition. It's a hefty investment, but I always have a good chuckle when I see n00bs messing with their crufty rilkef infested codebases. | null | 0 | 1543651494 | False | 0 | eaucid3 | t3_a1we32 | null | null | t1_eat9h9a | /r/programming/comments/a1we32/i_put_words_on_this_webpage_so_you_have_to_listen/eaucid3/ | 1546270602 | 2 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | m50d | t2_6q02y | Not much of a case for "should have used Ada" if it's really "should have used any of dozens or hundreds of non-C languages". | null | 0 | 1544782253 | False | 0 | ebrcnxb | t3_a5ylm8 | null | null | t1_ebqpdrw | /r/programming/comments/a5ylm8/should_have_used_ada_1_how_some_famous/ebrcnxb/ | 1547590703 | 2 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | ErroneousFunk | t2_3mzmc | It never hurts to always be thinking about about variable allocations (and if you really need them), whether you can eliminate a branch or not, whether you need to add to the beginning of an array or the end of it.... Why it matters, when it matters.
It really does matter in certain situations, even at the highest level languages. Compilers and processors are good, but not magic. | null | 0 | 1543651532 | False | 0 | eaucj48 | t3_a1rp4s | null | null | t1_eashhva | /r/programming/comments/a1rp4s/why_is_2_i_i_faster_than_2_i_i_java/eaucj48/ | 1546270612 | 1 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | mck1117 | t2_ck43v | Not only is visual 6502 an emulator, it's a *gate level emulator*. It's emulating the transistors. In javascript. In your browser. In an OS. On your computer. | null | 0 | 1544782475 | False | 0 | ebrcsn9 | t3_a61to1 | null | null | t1_ebr8p86 | /r/programming/comments/a61to1/write_your_own_virtual_machine/ebrcsn9/ | 1547590762 | 165 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | Freyr90 | t2_qy7vh | > They are personal
How do you find which code is broken after you changed the return value type of your function from `_ -> int` to `_ -> Maybe int`? | null | 0 | 1543651669 | False | 0 | eauclpw | t3_a1o5iz | null | null | t1_eattazs | /r/programming/comments/a1o5iz/maybe_not_rich_hickey/eauclpw/ | 1546270644 | 2 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | shevegen | t2_atqp | Poor guy. | null | 0 | 1544782508 | False | 0 | ebrctbs | t3_a62mux | null | null | t3_a62mux | /r/programming/comments/a62mux/typescript_was_it_worth/ebrctbs/ | 1547590771 | -9 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | dvdkon | t2_dj4da | Apple's not really clear on this, but it seems to me that to use TestFlight, you need a developer subscription, since it's managed through App Store Connect just like App Store publishing. | null | 0 | 1543651674 | False | 0 | eaucltk | t3_a16q8g | null | null | t1_eatqw8n | /r/programming/comments/a16q8g/exploiting_javascript_developer_infrastructure_is/eaucltk/ | 1546270645 | 1 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | shevegen | t2_atqp | Outdated type declarations?
I find type declarations already a pain point to begin with.
Some people need guidance since their feeble brain does not function without types. | null | 0 | 1544782549 | False | 0 | ebrcu6i | t3_a62mux | null | null | t1_ebrbtvr | /r/programming/comments/a62mux/typescript_was_it_worth/ebrcu6i/ | 1547590811 | -32 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | chillidoor | t2_159qjs | Pretty much Hacker News. | null | 0 | 1543652336 | False | 0 | eauczxy | t3_a1we32 | null | null | t3_a1we32 | /r/programming/comments/a1we32/i_put_words_on_this_webpage_so_you_have_to_listen/eauczxy/ | 1546270849 | 4 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | Aphix | t2_36j3z | set -o pipefail for bonus points | null | 0 | 1544782570 | False | 0 | ebrcumg | t3_a5sg9k | null | null | t1_ebqa7ak | /r/programming/comments/a5sg9k/how_unix_programmers_at_restaurants_search_menus/ebrcumg/ | 1547590817 | 1 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | ahwae | t2_nxoyfqo | And the article closes with the wrong advice:
> Unless you'd like unsolicited messages coming out of your printer, now might be a good time to make sure your firmware is up to date.
It's a printer; its job is to print and a firmware update is unlikely to change that. Just take your printer behind a firewall or router. | null | 0 | 1543652538 | 1543676678 | 0 | eaud49r | t3_a1ysx2 | null | null | t3_a1ysx2 | /r/programming/comments/a1ysx2/hacker_hijacks_50000_printers_with_pret_to_tell/eaud49r/ | 1546270903 | 619 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | Japierdolocky | t2_1iyge8nu | If you have that kind of hostile environment you (as a company) won't produce good code. | null | 0 | 1544782585 | False | 0 | ebrcuwl | t3_a5ylm8 | null | null | t1_ebr9hii | /r/programming/comments/a5ylm8/should_have_used_ada_1_how_some_famous/ebrcuwl/ | 1547590820 | 3 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | stevedonovan | t2_4otti | That's a very tasteful use of colour. I agree with those that say that using more than three colours is asking for design trouble. | null | 0 | 1543652842 | False | 0 | eaudar3 | t3_a1jjyg | null | null | t1_earwh7l | /r/programming/comments/a1jjyg/a_new_look_for_rustlangorg/eaudar3/ | 1546270983 | 1 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | jcelerier | t2_nju89 | I'd rather use my feeble brain to do useful stuff rather than reimplementing what my computer knows to do perfectly well (checking types) | null | 0 | 1544782976 | False | 0 | ebrd30h | t3_a62mux | null | null | t1_ebrcu6i | /r/programming/comments/a62mux/typescript_was_it_worth/ebrd30h/ | 1547590920 | 21 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | [deleted] | None | [deleted] | null | 0 | 1543652920 | False | 0 | eaudcca | t3_a219ba | null | null | t3_a219ba | /r/programming/comments/a219ba/makefiles_best_practices/eaudcca/ | 1546271002 | -10 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | shevegen | t2_atqp | Microsoft's self-promo knows no boundaries.
It's also hilarious how they claim xyz without showing the data to any of these claims.
> All of this growth is thanks to the open source community.
Right - simple patsies. Where did all that +7 billion dollars flow? Definitely not to the users. To the users only promo flows.
> Together, you’ve built and collaborated on a broad spectrum of projects,
> from hobbies to professional tools and across varying developer
> experience levels.
They need Github to do so?
> You also had a lot of fun, starring and contributing to gaming projects
Wow - they can even analyse the psyche. Now you know that you had
a "lot of fun"! I wonder which advanced method they employ to come to
this conclusion. I myself can not really evaluate much at all from written
text alone.
> New open source projects also helped you get work done with tools
> like denoland/deno for developing in TypeScript
Never heard of this before. Or is that another promo? We now need
TypeScript to get things done?
> We pulled the top 10 projects open sourced in 2018 based on
> the total number of stars they accumulated in their first 28 days
> on GitHub.
That is a flawed way too. Back when I was using Github before the
hostile MS take-over, I would use stars primarily to keep track of
what may seem interesting but even then I would use this sparingly.
That in itself does not say much about usage of any project. People
could star but not use a project, so...
nodejs
react
dotnet
docker
android
machine-learning
api
ios
cli
vue
That list is pretty sad. Are these topics very interesting? Node?
Machine "learning"? I still don't understand why the word "learning"
is used there.
> Cheers and congratulations to a year of new ideas emerging,
> knowledge gained, and continually changing the way we build
> and think about software development.
Yeah! For example by not depending on [big company dominating
the field] here.
Strangely enough I have ideas without Github too. | null | 0 | 1544782999 | False | 0 | ebrd3ht | t3_a634wb | null | null | t3_a634wb | /r/programming/comments/a634wb/the_state_of_the_octoverse_new_open_source/ebrd3ht/ | 1547590926 | -14 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | dima55 | t2_8j6ak | Nah, he just needs to learn how to use Make. CMake fixed exactly none of the issues that Make has. | null | 0 | 1543652991 | False | 0 | eauddsq | t3_a219ba | null | null | t1_eaudcca | /r/programming/comments/a219ba/makefiles_best_practices/eauddsq/ | 1546271020 | 11 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | shevegen | t2_atqp | Upvoted for "full keyboard warrior".
The modern-day samurai know where to strike at.
I did not watch the video - I feel videos take too much time compared to written text. | null | 0 | 1544783061 | False | 0 | ebrd4qn | t3_a60dlr | null | null | t1_ebqs3ge | /r/programming/comments/a60dlr/the_difference_between_interpreted_languages_and/ebrd4qn/ | 1547590941 | 23 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | dima55 | t2_8j6ak | This is wrong:
LIBS = $(shell ${PKG_CONFIG} --libs openssl)
Please don't do this. You're using a deferred variable (that you're calling "lazy" for some reason) for a shell expansion. This will spawn a pkg-config subprocess each time $(LIBS) is evaluated, which is slow. Use immediate variables here. | null | 0 | 1543653082 | False | 0 | eaudfo3 | t3_a219ba | null | null | t3_a219ba | /r/programming/comments/a219ba/makefiles_best_practices/eaudfo3/ | 1546271043 | 20 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | adymitruk | t2_35hrz | I tried the protobuf route, but it's easier to just do conventions implicitly and rely on json serialization alone. Keep things simple. Maybe add a meta wrapper and semantic versioning as a property at that level to catch unexpected newer versions as a guard. If you're doing event sourcing, version the events. | null | 0 | 1544783095 | False | 0 | ebrd5fn | t3_a5y50c | null | null | t1_ebrcndj | /r/programming/comments/a5y50c/why_bad_software_architecture_is_easy_to_monetize/ebrd5fn/ | 1547590950 | 2 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | myringotomy | t2_9f1cg | >Can you say the same?
First of all why should I believe you. You didn't even know first to file was a thing. Something you could have looked up on wikipedia in a second but didn't and instead hit the reply button all smug and thinking you were right.
>That shift, while dramatic, did not change how prior-art applies in this situation; you still can't patent something that's been shown anywhere in public.
The chances of prior art overturning your patent are pretty close to zero. It just doesn't happen that often. | null | 0 | 1543653159 | False | 0 | eaudh83 | t3_a1tazn | null | null | t1_eau0ac9 | /r/programming/comments/a1tazn/company_google_tried_to_patent_my_work_after_a/eaudh83/ | 1546271063 | -7 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | shevegen | t2_atqp | That solely depends on the definition of the words used.
Different languages claim to use OOP and from within the context of the respective definition, it's a proper definition. Of course most languages use an awful joke of what they call OOP but that is another issue. | null | 0 | 1544783126 | False | 0 | ebrd616 | t3_a60dlr | null | null | t1_ebrccq6 | /r/programming/comments/a60dlr/the_difference_between_interpreted_languages_and/ebrd616/ | 1547590958 | -13 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | niczar | t2_3enpx | Everything's fair to beat T-series. | null | 0 | 1543653313 | False | 0 | eaudkaq | t3_a1ysx2 | null | null | t3_a1ysx2 | /r/programming/comments/a1ysx2/hacker_hijacks_50000_printers_with_pret_to_tell/eaudkaq/ | 1546271101 | 193 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | BezierPatch | t2_c70er | A parser can't do semantic highlighting.
How would it know that a symbol comes from an external import?
Only a language server can provide that kind of information. | null | 0 | 1544783274 | False | 0 | ebrd93d | t3_a5mk9z | null | null | t1_ebotx04 | /r/programming/comments/a5mk9z/visual_studio_code_version_130_released/ebrd93d/ | 1547590996 | 2 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | [deleted] | None | [deleted] | null | 0 | 1543653440 | False | 0 | eaudmsz | t3_a1tazn | null | null | t3_a1tazn | /r/programming/comments/a1tazn/company_google_tried_to_patent_my_work_after_a/eaudmsz/ | 1546271132 | 1 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | Candid_Calligrapher | t2_2nsvdulx | That's a good point. Would that be like Tcl for example? | null | 0 | 1544783325 | False | 0 | ebrda3p | t3_a60dlr | null | null | t1_ebrcf4y | /r/programming/comments/a60dlr/the_difference_between_interpreted_languages_and/ebrda3p/ | 1547591008 | 5 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | Honkmueller | t2_b2lwn | The Rick and Morty reference is waaay far down here. The words she used sounded just like some Justin Roiland shit.
Edit: It‘s Morty, of cause. Stupid fingers | null | 0 | 1543653441 | 1543728635 | 0 | eaudmtl | t3_a1we32 | null | null | t1_eau3pli | /r/programming/comments/a1we32/i_put_words_on_this_webpage_so_you_have_to_listen/eaudmtl/ | 1546271132 | 3 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | Fabien_C | t2_okzh1 | > I have no doubt that Ada is a safer language than C (not hard) but this seems like a poor example.
This is only the first blog post in a series it seems. We will see if the of cases are more significant for you. | null | 0 | 1544783386 | False | 0 | ebrdbc2 | t3_a5ylm8 | null | null | t1_ebqmgs6 | /r/programming/comments/a5ylm8/should_have_used_ada_1_how_some_famous/ebrdbc2/ | 1547591023 | 6 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | DanySpin97 | t2_134nrq | Not everyone out there use CMake (or meson, which is even better) and these are common error I see often in open source projects.
Same things written here also helps with CMake and meson because `PREFIX` is a standard often misused. | null | 0 | 1543653529 | False | 0 | eaudomm | t3_a219ba | null | null | t1_eaudcca | /r/programming/comments/a219ba/makefiles_best_practices/eaudomm/ | 1546271154 | 3 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | jcelerier | t2_nju89 | > I've yet to see code that was intentionally designed from the beginning for "flexibility" actually be flexible in a way that was useful. (And to be clear, I have personally made this mistake).
the system I've been working on ([a multimedia sequencer](https://ossia.io)) has been designed with flexibility from the ground up (e.g. lots of interfaces, dynamically loaded plugins), and while it had a cost in terms of amount of code, it also had a non negligible number of benefits :
- interns and students could come and write their own plug-in to the system without needing to touch at the existing code at all ; just drop the new code in a folder, launch a build, and here it is
- the base of the system could be used as a basis for other, unrelated software which saved a lot on development costs
- much easier to support cross-platform things, e.g. various audio APIs between mac / windows / linux / wasm or additional network / multimedia protocols (MIDI, DMX, OSC, etc etc...)
- multiples scripting language could be easily integrated (javascript, python, and now a JIT c++ compiler since some users demand maximal performance for their custom algorithms and JS just doesn't cut it)
designing like this from the ground up allows for most features to be developed independently from all the other, especially if you enforce strict compile-time boundaries between modules with hidden symbol visibility.
Of course, to choose where the interfaces are, I use the rule of 3 (if the same code crops up at three different places, it's time to refactor and abstract it) - it's not perfect but it's a good rule of thumb to get started. | null | 0 | 1544783482 | 1544783691 | 0 | ebrddau | t3_a5y50c | null | null | t1_ebqt7s7 | /r/programming/comments/a5y50c/why_bad_software_architecture_is_easy_to_monetize/ebrddau/ | 1547591047 | 3 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | t4nt4lus | t2_7ce13 | That is core | null | 0 | 1543653659 | False | 0 | eaudrb0 | t3_a1rp4s | null | null | t1_eau8h6z | /r/programming/comments/a1rp4s/why_is_2_i_i_faster_than_2_i_i_java/eaudrb0/ | 1546271187 | 3 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | JeezyTheSnowman | t2_9rynl | I would have bought it if it was like $20-30. $80 is too much for me especially with players like VSC or even vim w/ plugins all being free and open source | null | 0 | 1544783638 | False | 0 | ebrdghz | t3_a5mk9z | null | null | t1_ebqyejs | /r/programming/comments/a5mk9z/visual_studio_code_version_130_released/ebrdghz/ | 1547591087 | 0 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | CallMeMrBadGuy | t2_3n2ty | The guy phoned in his horseshit without reading the post lol | null | 0 | 1543653733 | False | 0 | eaudsrx | t3_a1tazn | null | null | t1_eaua45t | /r/programming/comments/a1tazn/company_google_tried_to_patent_my_work_after_a/eaudsrx/ | 1546271206 | 1 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | Fabien_C | t2_okzh1 | > does it implement an borrow checker like Rust?
Something equivalent will be implemented in SPARK/Ada.
But you should look beyond the borrow checker. Memory safety is nice, functional safety is better.
>Can it reduce verbose error checks (which obscure the story of the code behind repetitive bookkeeping) by allowing functions to return algebraic Maybe<> types?
There are ways to do that, I think, but the code will not look very nice.
> Does it support programming-by-contract?
Yes it does. Even more so since Ada2012.
https://learn.adacore.com/courses/intro-to-ada/chapters/contracts.html
> Can you place unit tests in the same file as a function so that test code is also the example code?
You can declare test cases in the specification of the unit.
[edit: link to Ada design by contract lesson] | null | 0 | 1544783640 | 1544783858 | 0 | ebrdgjg | t3_a5ylm8 | null | null | t1_ebqyegu | /r/programming/comments/a5ylm8/should_have_used_ada_1_how_some_famous/ebrdgjg/ | 1547591087 | 8 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | Vitus13 | t2_7g68a | The digital millennium copywrite act contains an exception for the preservation of digital files on legacy media. It's how archive.org is able to have so many old games on it. So although you won't be buying IP rights when buying these disks, you probably (IANAL) don't need them to justify making a copy. | null | 0 | 1543654006 | False | 0 | eaudygh | t3_a1y1rq | null | null | t3_a1y1rq | /r/programming/comments/a1y1rq/al_lowe_reveals_his_sierra_source_code/eaudygh/ | 1546271275 | 28 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | JeezyTheSnowman | t2_9rynl | Personally, I would buy it if it was $20-30 | null | 0 | 1544783668 | False | 0 | ebrdh41 | t3_a5mk9z | null | null | t1_ebr303r | /r/programming/comments/a5mk9z/visual_studio_code_version_130_released/ebrdh41/ | 1547591095 | 1 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | dpash | t2_5bdkm | > Side-effects
> - A function does more than 1 thing. Lets say deleteUser() also animates some text and graphics. That's a side-effect
That's not really what a side effect is. The number of actions is not important. A function can do one thing and still have side effects.
A function without side effects will not cause state to change. IO by its nature is a side-effect.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Side_effect_(computer_science) | null | 0 | 1543654244 | False | 0 | eaue3sm | t3_a1tbm4 | null | null | t1_eatb7d3 | /r/programming/comments/a1tbm4/this_explains_why_maintaining_reactive_code_makes/eaue3sm/ | 1546271342 | 4 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | jcelerier | t2_nju89 | > But why use tooling if your languages does it for you?
in practice there is not much difference between "the language" and "the tooling", since it's the tooling which implements the language. e.g. in C and C++ you can enable clang-tidy warnings to prevent this, and clang-tidy is basically clang with additional checks. | null | 0 | 1544783708 | False | 0 | ebrdhx7 | t3_a5ylm8 | null | null | t1_ebr00wo | /r/programming/comments/a5ylm8/should_have_used_ada_1_how_some_famous/ebrdhx7/ | 1547591104 | 4 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | [deleted] | None | I'm curious to see what a modernized Jenkins is like, moving away from it (in it's current state) has overall made by life much easier. | null | 0 | 1543654307 | False | 0 | eaue59q | t3_a2144y | null | null | t3_a2144y | /r/programming/comments/a2144y/5_initiatives_to_modernize_jenkins_and_kill_the/eaue59q/ | 1546271360 | 3 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | bvimo | t2_34p67 | From the fine article "That’s not a typo—today we’re shipping Bootstrap 3.4.0, a long overdue update to address some quality of life issues, XSS fixes, and build tooling updates to make it easier for us, and you, to develop."
Actually that's the first paragraph. | null | 0 | 1544783780 | False | 0 | ebrdjd6 | t3_a5zjwu | null | null | t1_ebr8i7b | /r/programming/comments/a5zjwu/bootstrap_340_released/ebrdjd6/ | 1547591122 | 9 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | touristtam | t2_ggn3q | Last week it has been aws this, aws that, however. | null | 0 | 1543654326 | False | 0 | eaue5py | t3_a1we32 | null | null | t1_eauczxy | /r/programming/comments/a1we32/i_put_words_on_this_webpage_so_you_have_to_listen/eaue5py/ | 1546271365 | 2 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | patrixxxx | t2_x9jjb8 | Not having watched the video I'd say procedural and functional is the way forward. Objects is a nice concept, but why attach state modifications onto them? Leave that to functions that take objects as parameters. I know this approach can create issues as well and sometimes OOP can be very elegant but I think this is the best general approach and there are no silver bullets. | null | 1 | 1544783868 | False | 0 | ebrdl6m | t3_a61j0v | null | null | t3_a61j0v | /r/programming/comments/a61j0v/kevlin_henney_procedural_programming_its_back_it/ebrdl6m/ | 1547591144 | 0 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | [deleted] | None | [deleted] | null | 0 | 1543654587 | 1545958756 | 0 | eauebi5 | t3_a1hnh7 | null | null | t1_ear8vh9 | /r/programming/comments/a1hnh7/what_covariance_contravariance_and_invariance_are/eauebi5/ | 1546271466 | 1 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | FanOfHoles | t2_2ftopua8 | I don't think that this is in any way useful these days, maybe until the 1990s. If you look at Javascript - as the most popular (as in "nr. of installations") example - you have both interpreted as well as compiled code at the same time. A modern runtime is what in the last millennium were separate tools compiler, profiler, interpreter, code analyzer all in one. There is a point where simplification is no longer "abstraction" but just wrong and the opposite of useful.
[Simons' BASIC](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simons%27_BASIC) was an interpreter. C code passed through gcc to build a Linux kernel is compiled. Those are nicely black/white. The JS runtime in a modern browser is not, as an example for where that black/white view fails quite miserably.
| null | 0 | 1544783977 | 1544784407 | 0 | ebrdnk5 | t3_a60dlr | null | null | t1_ebrcf4y | /r/programming/comments/a60dlr/the_difference_between_interpreted_languages_and/ebrdnk5/ | 1547591174 | 3 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | CnidariaScyphozoa | t2_hfkyj | I really like the style of that site with the font and color scheme! | null | 0 | 1543654711 | False | 0 | eauee7u | t3_a1we32 | null | null | t3_a1we32 | /r/programming/comments/a1we32/i_put_words_on_this_webpage_so_you_have_to_listen/eauee7u/ | 1546271499 | 5 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | Dockirby | t2_6ozpc | We have that. I think it's called C. | null | 0 | 1544784365 | False | 0 | ebrdvo5 | t3_a5y50c | null | null | t1_ebq5yqx | /r/programming/comments/a5y50c/why_bad_software_architecture_is_easy_to_monetize/ebrdvo5/ | 1547591274 | 20 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | Quadraxas | t2_gdald | not medium. not listening. | null | 0 | 1543654794 | False | 0 | eaueg3c | t3_a1we32 | null | null | t3_a1we32 | /r/programming/comments/a1we32/i_put_words_on_this_webpage_so_you_have_to_listen/eaueg3c/ | 1546271523 | 12 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | jesusmg | t2_3yhs4 | Hahaa nice way to teach basics on how to use pipes and sed / awk, which is the main goal of the post, AFAIK.
I dare you to do the same with windows batch
Ok, powershell then :) | null | 0 | 1544784376 | False | 0 | ebrdvwd | t3_a5sg9k | null | null | t3_a5sg9k | /r/programming/comments/a5sg9k/how_unix_programmers_at_restaurants_search_menus/ebrdvwd/ | 1547591277 | -1 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | dtechnology | t2_7gar4 | Is that Noon language a satire/esoteric lamguage or serious? I think the first, but I cannot 100% tell and that scares me. | null | 0 | 1543654876 | False | 0 | eauehu2 | t3_a1we32 | null | null | t1_eau5q6i | /r/programming/comments/a1we32/i_put_words_on_this_webpage_so_you_have_to_listen/eauehu2/ | 1546271544 | 8 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | Snowtype | t2_2rwuie3t | Yeah, the problem is more that he doesn't want to use the shared data structures, so now how he wants us to write copy constructors between the two for no real reason (because he doesn't actually want to do it himself). Agree with using implicitly conventionalized json-ish structures, it's the quickest choice when working in a scripted environment without hard structure types at least, one of the advantages of scripting languages, but it's a burden in a hard typed language. | null | 0 | 1544784410 | False | 0 | ebrdwmt | t3_a5y50c | null | null | t1_ebrd5fn | /r/programming/comments/a5y50c/why_bad_software_architecture_is_easy_to_monetize/ebrdwmt/ | 1547591287 | 1 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |