hypothesis
stringlengths 11
215
| context
stringlengths 0
2.9k
| hypothesis_formula
stringlengths 3
39
| context_formula
stringlengths 0
905
| proofs
sequence | proof_label
stringclasses 3
values | proofs_formula
sequence | world_assump_label
stringclasses 3
values | original_tree_depth
int64 1
4
| depth
int64 0
3
⌀ | num_formula_distractors
int64 0
22
| num_translation_distractors
int64 0
0
| num_all_distractors
int64 0
22
| negative_hypothesis
stringlengths 15
193
⌀ | negative_hypothesis_formula
stringlengths 3
37
⌀ | negative_original_tree_depth
int64 0
25
⌀ | negative_proofs
sequence | negative_proof_label
stringclasses 2
values | negative_world_assump_label
stringclasses 2
values | prompt_serial
stringlengths 89
3.09k
| proof_serial
stringlengths 11
654
| version
stringclasses 1
value | premise
stringlengths 0
195
| assumptions
sequence | paraphrased_premises
sequence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
there exists something such that if the fact that it is not a co-star and does not hew Sus does not hold it does hew epicureanism. | sent1: there exists something such that if it does hew Sus it hews epicureanism. sent2: there is something such that if that it is unwieldy but not puerile does not hold then it diverges galangal. sent3: if the six is not a co-star and does not hew Sus it does hew epicureanism. sent4: if the fact that something does not co-star and does not hew Sus is false then it hews epicureanism. sent5: if that something is a kind of Flemish thing that is not a wedge is not true then it does stone. sent6: if the six does wheeze it is photochemical. sent7: if the fact that the six does co-star and does not hew Sus is not true then it hews epicureanism. sent8: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a co-star and does not hew Sus the fact that it does hew epicureanism hold. sent9: if something does not co-star and does not hew Sus then it hews epicureanism. sent10: there exists something such that if the fact that it does not co-star and does hew Sus is false then that it hews epicureanism is right. sent11: that there exists something such that if it is a co-star then it hews epicureanism is correct. sent12: the fact that the six hews epicureanism is not false if it does hew Sus. sent13: if that something is not photochemical and it is not a vivisection is false it strangles. sent14: if something is indiscernible then the fact that it is painful hold. sent15: there is something such that if the fact that it does not murmur and it is not a belief does not hold it dodges reinforcer. sent16: there exists something such that if the fact that it is a kind of a co-star that does not hew Sus is incorrect it does hew epicureanism. | (Ex): ¬(¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> {B}x | sent1: (Ex): {AB}x -> {B}x sent2: (Ex): ¬({FN}x & ¬{BK}x) -> {HQ}x sent3: (¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa} sent4: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> {B}x sent5: (x): ¬({HA}x & ¬{DU}x) -> {H}x sent6: {AJ}{aa} -> {GQ}{aa} sent7: ¬({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa} sent8: (Ex): (¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> {B}x sent9: (x): (¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> {B}x sent10: (Ex): ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) -> {B}x sent11: (Ex): {AA}x -> {B}x sent12: {AB}{aa} -> {B}{aa} sent13: (x): ¬(¬{GQ}x & ¬{IQ}x) -> {BP}x sent14: (x): {AU}x -> {IA}x sent15: (Ex): ¬(¬{DQ}x & ¬{BC}x) -> {CJ}x sent16: (Ex): ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> {B}x | [
"sent4 -> int1: if that the six is not a co-star and does not hew Sus is not correct then it does hew epicureanism.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | [
"sent4 -> int1: ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa}; int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | 2 | 2 | 15 | 0 | 15 | null | null | null | [] | null | null | $hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if the fact that it is not a co-star and does not hew Sus does not hold it does hew epicureanism. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it does hew Sus it hews epicureanism. sent2: there is something such that if that it is unwieldy but not puerile does not hold then it diverges galangal. sent3: if the six is not a co-star and does not hew Sus it does hew epicureanism. sent4: if the fact that something does not co-star and does not hew Sus is false then it hews epicureanism. sent5: if that something is a kind of Flemish thing that is not a wedge is not true then it does stone. sent6: if the six does wheeze it is photochemical. sent7: if the fact that the six does co-star and does not hew Sus is not true then it hews epicureanism. sent8: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a co-star and does not hew Sus the fact that it does hew epicureanism hold. sent9: if something does not co-star and does not hew Sus then it hews epicureanism. sent10: there exists something such that if the fact that it does not co-star and does hew Sus is false then that it hews epicureanism is right. sent11: that there exists something such that if it is a co-star then it hews epicureanism is correct. sent12: the fact that the six hews epicureanism is not false if it does hew Sus. sent13: if that something is not photochemical and it is not a vivisection is false it strangles. sent14: if something is indiscernible then the fact that it is painful hold. sent15: there is something such that if the fact that it does not murmur and it is not a belief does not hold it dodges reinforcer. sent16: there exists something such that if the fact that it is a kind of a co-star that does not hew Sus is incorrect it does hew epicureanism. ; $proof$ = | sent4 -> int1: if that the six is not a co-star and does not hew Sus is not correct then it does hew epicureanism.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ | DeductionInstance | if the fact that something does not co-star and does not hew Sus is false then it hews epicureanism. | [] | [
"if the fact that something does not co-star and does not hew Sus is false then it hews epicureanism."
] |
that the cedarbird does not glaze Areopagus is correct. | sent1: something is a goatsbeard. sent2: something is not a goatsbeard. sent3: if there is something such that it is not a kind of a goatsbeard then the grove is not a IMO. sent4: something does glaze Areopagus and it is a goatsbeard if it is not a kind of a profession. sent5: if the grove is not a kind of a profession and is not a IMO then the cedarbird does not glaze Areopagus. sent6: if the grove is both not a profession and a IMO then the cedarbird does not glaze Areopagus. sent7: the grove is not a IMO. sent8: the grove does not glaze Areopagus if the cedarbird is not a kind of a profession and glaze Areopagus. | ¬{D}{b} | sent1: (Ex): {A}x sent2: (Ex): ¬{A}x sent3: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬{C}{a} sent4: (x): ¬{B}x -> ({D}x & {A}x) sent5: (¬{B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) -> ¬{D}{b} sent6: (¬{B}{a} & {C}{a}) -> ¬{D}{b} sent7: ¬{C}{a} sent8: (¬{B}{b} & {D}{b}) -> ¬{D}{a} | [] | UNKNOWN | [] | UNKNOWN | 2 | null | 6 | 0 | 6 | the cedarbird does glaze Areopagus. | {D}{b} | 5 | [
"sent4 -> int1: the cedarbird does glaze Areopagus and is a goatsbeard if it is not a profession.;"
] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = that the cedarbird does not glaze Areopagus is correct. ; $context$ = sent1: something is a goatsbeard. sent2: something is not a goatsbeard. sent3: if there is something such that it is not a kind of a goatsbeard then the grove is not a IMO. sent4: something does glaze Areopagus and it is a goatsbeard if it is not a kind of a profession. sent5: if the grove is not a kind of a profession and is not a IMO then the cedarbird does not glaze Areopagus. sent6: if the grove is both not a profession and a IMO then the cedarbird does not glaze Areopagus. sent7: the grove is not a IMO. sent8: the grove does not glaze Areopagus if the cedarbird is not a kind of a profession and glaze Areopagus. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ | DeductionInstance | something is not a goatsbeard. | [
"something does glaze Areopagus and it is a goatsbeard if it is not a kind of a profession."
] | [
"something is not a goatsbeard."
] |
not the mountaineering but the reciting happens. | sent1: if that the kindness occurs hold the satiateness occurs. sent2: if the carunculateness does not occur that the fact that the achondriticness happens and the austeniticness happens is false is not incorrect. sent3: the glazing breakable does not occur if the secondary does not occur. sent4: the reciting is caused by that the lossiness happens. sent5: that the carunculateness occurs is prevented by that the biosyntheticness happens and the glazing epicureanism does not occur. sent6: if the flush occurs the flood happens. sent7: the non-bifilarness is prevented by the satiateness. sent8: if the organicisticness does not occur then both the kindness and the regurgitation occurs. sent9: if the flood happens then the glazing breakable does not occur and the secondariness does not occur. sent10: the mountaineering does not occur. sent11: if the fact that the achondriticness and the austeniticness occurs is false the achondriticness does not occur. sent12: the mountaineering does not occur and the reciting does not occur if the glazing breakable does not occur. sent13: both the discontinuance and the non-parochialness occurs if the lossiness does not occur. sent14: that the parochialness occurs and the lossiness does not occur is brought about by that the glazing breakable does not occur. sent15: the bifilarness results in that the biosyntheticness happens but the glazing epicureanism does not occur. sent16: the flush and the diverging sapsago occurs if the achondriticness does not occur. | (¬{D} & {C}) | sent1: {Q} -> {P} sent2: ¬{K} -> ¬({J} & {L}) sent3: ¬{F} -> ¬{E} sent4: {B} -> {C} sent5: ({M} & ¬{N}) -> ¬{K} sent6: {H} -> {G} sent7: {P} -> {O} sent8: ¬{S} -> ({Q} & {R}) sent9: {G} -> (¬{E} & ¬{F}) sent10: ¬{D} sent11: ¬({J} & {L}) -> ¬{J} sent12: ¬{E} -> (¬{D} & ¬{C}) sent13: ¬{B} -> ({HA} & ¬{A}) sent14: ¬{E} -> ({A} & ¬{B}) sent15: {O} -> ({M} & ¬{N}) sent16: ¬{J} -> ({H} & {I}) | [] | UNKNOWN | [] | UNKNOWN | 3 | null | 14 | 0 | 14 | that the mountaineering does not occur but the reciting occurs is wrong. | ¬(¬{D} & {C}) | 7 | [] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = not the mountaineering but the reciting happens. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the kindness occurs hold the satiateness occurs. sent2: if the carunculateness does not occur that the fact that the achondriticness happens and the austeniticness happens is false is not incorrect. sent3: the glazing breakable does not occur if the secondary does not occur. sent4: the reciting is caused by that the lossiness happens. sent5: that the carunculateness occurs is prevented by that the biosyntheticness happens and the glazing epicureanism does not occur. sent6: if the flush occurs the flood happens. sent7: the non-bifilarness is prevented by the satiateness. sent8: if the organicisticness does not occur then both the kindness and the regurgitation occurs. sent9: if the flood happens then the glazing breakable does not occur and the secondariness does not occur. sent10: the mountaineering does not occur. sent11: if the fact that the achondriticness and the austeniticness occurs is false the achondriticness does not occur. sent12: the mountaineering does not occur and the reciting does not occur if the glazing breakable does not occur. sent13: both the discontinuance and the non-parochialness occurs if the lossiness does not occur. sent14: that the parochialness occurs and the lossiness does not occur is brought about by that the glazing breakable does not occur. sent15: the bifilarness results in that the biosyntheticness happens but the glazing epicureanism does not occur. sent16: the flush and the diverging sapsago occurs if the achondriticness does not occur. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ | DeductionInstance | if the fact that the achondriticness and the austeniticness occurs is false the achondriticness does not occur. | [
"the reciting is caused by that the lossiness happens."
] | [
"if the fact that the achondriticness and the austeniticness occurs is false the achondriticness does not occur."
] |
the fact that the cinerariness and the non-interlinearness happens is incorrect. | sent1: the glazing Craigie but not the vicinalness happens. sent2: the hollering occurs and the glint does not occur if the ugliness occurs. sent3: the schismaticness happens. sent4: if the draining happens then the ineligibleness and the non-uglyness occurs. sent5: the dripping happens. sent6: if the self-preservation occurs the approach occurs but the Comstockery does not occur. sent7: the hewing Elector occurs. sent8: if the dripping happens then both the cinerariness and the non-interlinearness occurs. sent9: the dodging tough occurs and the circularization does not occur. | ¬({AA} & ¬{AB}) | sent1: ({GT} & ¬{EN}) sent2: {IO} -> ({GN} & ¬{CG}) sent3: {B} sent4: {II} -> ({DJ} & ¬{IO}) sent5: {A} sent6: {HU} -> ({HP} & ¬{FA}) sent7: {CU} sent8: {A} -> ({AA} & ¬{AB}) sent9: ({AL} & ¬{EB}) | [
"sent8 & sent5 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | [
"sent8 & sent5 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | 1 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 7 | null | null | null | [] | null | null | $hypothesis$ = the fact that the cinerariness and the non-interlinearness happens is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the glazing Craigie but not the vicinalness happens. sent2: the hollering occurs and the glint does not occur if the ugliness occurs. sent3: the schismaticness happens. sent4: if the draining happens then the ineligibleness and the non-uglyness occurs. sent5: the dripping happens. sent6: if the self-preservation occurs the approach occurs but the Comstockery does not occur. sent7: the hewing Elector occurs. sent8: if the dripping happens then both the cinerariness and the non-interlinearness occurs. sent9: the dodging tough occurs and the circularization does not occur. ; $proof$ = | sent8 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ | DeductionInstance | if the dripping happens then both the cinerariness and the non-interlinearness occurs. | [
"the dripping happens."
] | [
"if the dripping happens then both the cinerariness and the non-interlinearness occurs."
] |
the takeout is not an intervenor. | sent1: the factor does not glaze plangency and is not a moronity if it is unlikable. sent2: something is a moronity and it glazes plangency if it is sympathetic. sent3: the takeout is an intervenor if the factor hews distortionist. sent4: the takeout is a kind of a Bradford. sent5: something is a Bradford and does not hew distortionist if it is a moronity. sent6: if the factor does not dodge Cheddar then the takeout is not a ascospore or it does not hew pouched or both. sent7: something does not dodge Cheddar if that it dodge Cheddar and it displeases is false. sent8: something does hew distortionist if it is a moronity. sent9: that the factor dodges Cheddar and it displeases is incorrect if it is not a raw. sent10: the factor is an intervenor. sent11: the takeout is an intervenor if it hews distortionist. sent12: if the clinid is a moronity then the Cheddar is a moronity. sent13: the takeout is not an intervenor if the factor is a Bradford that is not an intervenor. sent14: the takeout hews distortionist if the factor is a Bradford. sent15: the fact that the factor is not the raw if that the factor is not unportable and it does not glaze causeway does not hold is right. sent16: the factor is a Bradford. sent17: the factor is a Bradford and not an intervenor if the Cheddar hews distortionist. sent18: something that is not a ascospore and/or does not hew pouched is not unlikable. sent19: the snout is a Bradford. sent20: if the factor is a kind of a Bradford it is an intervenor. | ¬{C}{b} | sent1: {F}{a} -> (¬{E}{a} & ¬{D}{a}) sent2: (x): ¬{F}x -> ({D}x & {E}x) sent3: {B}{a} -> {C}{b} sent4: {A}{b} sent5: (x): {D}x -> ({A}x & ¬{B}x) sent6: ¬{I}{a} -> (¬{H}{b} v ¬{G}{b}) sent7: (x): ¬({I}x & {J}x) -> ¬{I}x sent8: (x): {D}x -> {B}x sent9: ¬{K}{a} -> ¬({I}{a} & {J}{a}) sent10: {C}{a} sent11: {B}{b} -> {C}{b} sent12: {D}{d} -> {D}{c} sent13: ({A}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) -> ¬{C}{b} sent14: {A}{a} -> {B}{b} sent15: ¬(¬{L}{a} & ¬{M}{a}) -> ¬{K}{a} sent16: {A}{a} sent17: {B}{c} -> ({A}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) sent18: (x): (¬{H}x v ¬{G}x) -> ¬{F}x sent19: {A}{gg} sent20: {A}{a} -> {C}{a} | [
"sent14 & sent16 -> int1: the takeout does hew distortionist.; int1 & sent11 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | [
"sent14 & sent16 -> int1: {B}{b}; int1 & sent11 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | 2 | 2 | 17 | 0 | 17 | the fact that the fizz is an intervenor is not wrong. | {C}{jc} | 5 | [] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the takeout is not an intervenor. ; $context$ = sent1: the factor does not glaze plangency and is not a moronity if it is unlikable. sent2: something is a moronity and it glazes plangency if it is sympathetic. sent3: the takeout is an intervenor if the factor hews distortionist. sent4: the takeout is a kind of a Bradford. sent5: something is a Bradford and does not hew distortionist if it is a moronity. sent6: if the factor does not dodge Cheddar then the takeout is not a ascospore or it does not hew pouched or both. sent7: something does not dodge Cheddar if that it dodge Cheddar and it displeases is false. sent8: something does hew distortionist if it is a moronity. sent9: that the factor dodges Cheddar and it displeases is incorrect if it is not a raw. sent10: the factor is an intervenor. sent11: the takeout is an intervenor if it hews distortionist. sent12: if the clinid is a moronity then the Cheddar is a moronity. sent13: the takeout is not an intervenor if the factor is a Bradford that is not an intervenor. sent14: the takeout hews distortionist if the factor is a Bradford. sent15: the fact that the factor is not the raw if that the factor is not unportable and it does not glaze causeway does not hold is right. sent16: the factor is a Bradford. sent17: the factor is a Bradford and not an intervenor if the Cheddar hews distortionist. sent18: something that is not a ascospore and/or does not hew pouched is not unlikable. sent19: the snout is a Bradford. sent20: if the factor is a kind of a Bradford it is an intervenor. ; $proof$ = | sent14 & sent16 -> int1: the takeout does hew distortionist.; int1 & sent11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ | DeductionInstance | the takeout hews distortionist if the factor is a Bradford. | [
"the factor is a Bradford.",
"the takeout is an intervenor if it hews distortionist."
] | [
"If the factor is a Bradford, the takeout hews distortionist.",
"If the factor is aBradford, the takeout hews distortionist."
] |
that the palomino is a cottonmouth but it is not sensational is false. | sent1: something is a cottonmouth but not sensational if it is not gyral. sent2: the palomino is not gyral if it is not nonsectarian and/or is not gyral. sent3: the palomino is not nonsectarian or not gyral or both. | ¬({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) | sent1: (x): ¬{A}x -> ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) sent2: (¬{B}{aa} v ¬{A}{aa}) -> ¬{A}{aa} sent3: (¬{B}{aa} v ¬{A}{aa}) | [
"sent1 -> int1: if the palomino is not gyral then it is a kind of a cottonmouth and is not sensational.; sent2 & sent3 -> int2: the palomino is not gyral.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | [
"sent1 -> int1: ¬{A}{aa} -> ({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}); sent2 & sent3 -> int2: ¬{A}{aa}; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | [] | null | null | $hypothesis$ = that the palomino is a cottonmouth but it is not sensational is false. ; $context$ = sent1: something is a cottonmouth but not sensational if it is not gyral. sent2: the palomino is not gyral if it is not nonsectarian and/or is not gyral. sent3: the palomino is not nonsectarian or not gyral or both. ; $proof$ = | sent1 -> int1: if the palomino is not gyral then it is a kind of a cottonmouth and is not sensational.; sent2 & sent3 -> int2: the palomino is not gyral.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ | DeductionInstance | something is a cottonmouth but not sensational if it is not gyral. | [
"the palomino is not gyral if it is not nonsectarian and/or is not gyral.",
"the palomino is not nonsectarian or not gyral or both."
] | [
"If it is not gyral, something is a cottonmouth.",
"If it is not gyral, it is a cottonmouth."
] |
that both the backpedaling and the diverging rockfish occurs is correct. | sent1: the filialness does not occur. sent2: the upheaving does not occur. sent3: that the diverging rockfish does not occur is prevented by the dodging clutch. sent4: the backpedaling happens if the fact that the hewing skull happens is not incorrect. sent5: if that the glazing Granth happens is true then the exoergicness occurs. sent6: the lexicalness happens. sent7: the hysterotomy does not occur. sent8: the fact that the dodging clutch does not occur is true if that both the non-filialness and the dodging clutch occurs does not hold. sent9: that the glazing cowberry does not occur triggers that both the non-clockwiseness and the sexyness occurs. sent10: both the hewing skull and the lexicalness happens. sent11: the explosive happens. sent12: the hewing skull does not occur if the lexicalness does not occur. sent13: that the fact that the filialness happens and the dodging Coregonidae does not occur is not correct if the fact that the unsexiness does not occur is not wrong is not incorrect. sent14: if the fact that the filialness does not occur is not incorrect then the dodging Coregonidae occurs and/or the dodging clutch occurs. sent15: if the hewing skull does not occur then the fact that the backpedaling and the diverging rockfish happens is false. sent16: if the fact that the dodging Coregonidae occurs is not false the diverging rockfish occurs. | ({C} & {D}) | sent1: ¬{G} sent2: ¬{EE} sent3: {E} -> {D} sent4: {A} -> {C} sent5: {GR} -> {EI} sent6: {B} sent7: ¬{AD} sent8: ¬(¬{G} & {E}) -> ¬{E} sent9: ¬{J} -> (¬{I} & ¬{H}) sent10: ({A} & {B}) sent11: {HN} sent12: ¬{B} -> ¬{A} sent13: ¬{H} -> ¬({G} & ¬{F}) sent14: ¬{G} -> ({F} v {E}) sent15: ¬{A} -> ¬({C} & {D}) sent16: {F} -> {D} | [
"sent10 -> int1: the hewing skull happens.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the backpedaling happens.; sent14 & sent1 -> int3: the dodging Coregonidae occurs and/or the dodging clutch happens.; int3 & sent16 & sent3 -> int4: the diverging rockfish happens.; int2 & int4 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | [
"sent10 -> int1: {A}; int1 & sent4 -> int2: {C}; sent14 & sent1 -> int3: ({F} v {E}); int3 & sent16 & sent3 -> int4: {D}; int2 & int4 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | 3 | 3 | 10 | 0 | 10 | that the backpedaling occurs and the diverging rockfish happens is incorrect. | ¬({C} & {D}) | 6 | [] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = that both the backpedaling and the diverging rockfish occurs is correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the filialness does not occur. sent2: the upheaving does not occur. sent3: that the diverging rockfish does not occur is prevented by the dodging clutch. sent4: the backpedaling happens if the fact that the hewing skull happens is not incorrect. sent5: if that the glazing Granth happens is true then the exoergicness occurs. sent6: the lexicalness happens. sent7: the hysterotomy does not occur. sent8: the fact that the dodging clutch does not occur is true if that both the non-filialness and the dodging clutch occurs does not hold. sent9: that the glazing cowberry does not occur triggers that both the non-clockwiseness and the sexyness occurs. sent10: both the hewing skull and the lexicalness happens. sent11: the explosive happens. sent12: the hewing skull does not occur if the lexicalness does not occur. sent13: that the fact that the filialness happens and the dodging Coregonidae does not occur is not correct if the fact that the unsexiness does not occur is not wrong is not incorrect. sent14: if the fact that the filialness does not occur is not incorrect then the dodging Coregonidae occurs and/or the dodging clutch occurs. sent15: if the hewing skull does not occur then the fact that the backpedaling and the diverging rockfish happens is false. sent16: if the fact that the dodging Coregonidae occurs is not false the diverging rockfish occurs. ; $proof$ = | sent10 -> int1: the hewing skull happens.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the backpedaling happens.; sent14 & sent1 -> int3: the dodging Coregonidae occurs and/or the dodging clutch happens.; int3 & sent16 & sent3 -> int4: the diverging rockfish happens.; int2 & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ | DeductionInstance | both the hewing skull and the lexicalness happens. | [
"the backpedaling happens if the fact that the hewing skull happens is not incorrect.",
"if the fact that the filialness does not occur is not incorrect then the dodging Coregonidae occurs and/or the dodging clutch occurs.",
"the filialness does not occur.",
"if the fact that the dodging Coregonidae occurs is not false the diverging rockfish occurs.",
"that the diverging rockfish does not occur is prevented by the dodging clutch."
] | [
"The hewing skull and the lexicalness happen.",
"There are two things that happen: the hewing skull and the lexicalness.",
"There are two things that happen, the hewing skull and the lexicalness.",
"There is a hewing skull and a lexicalness.",
"The hewing skull and the lexicalness occur."
] |
the fact that the brand hews horsehide or it is not a morrow or both does not hold. | sent1: there is something such that the fact that it is not a glucose but a AFSPC does not hold. sent2: if something does hew horsehide and/or it is not a morrow then it is a sowbread. sent3: the brand does hew horsehide and/or is a morrow. sent4: the brand hews horsehide and/or is not a morrow if the alkapton glazes spermatocyte. sent5: the brand does glaze spermatocyte if there exists something such that it is not a AFSPC. sent6: if the brand is not a kind of a morrow then it is a kind of a sowbread. sent7: if something does glaze spermatocyte it is not a kind of a sowbread. sent8: something is not a glucose but it is a AFSPC. | ¬({AA}{aa} v ¬{AB}{aa}) | sent1: (Ex): ¬(¬{C}x & {D}x) sent2: (x): ({AA}x v ¬{AB}x) -> {B}x sent3: ({AA}{aa} v {AB}{aa}) sent4: {A}{a} -> ({AA}{aa} v ¬{AB}{aa}) sent5: (x): ¬{D}x -> {A}{aa} sent6: ¬{AB}{aa} -> {B}{aa} sent7: (x): {A}x -> ¬{B}x sent8: (Ex): (¬{C}x & {D}x) | [
"sent2 -> int1: the brand is a kind of a sowbread if it hews horsehide and/or it is not a morrow.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that either the brand hews horsehide or it is not a morrow or both.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the brand is a sowbread.; sent7 -> int3: the brand is not a sowbread if it does glaze spermatocyte.;"
] | UNKNOWN | [
"sent2 -> int1: ({AA}{aa} v ¬{AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa}; void -> assump1: ({AA}{aa} v ¬{AB}{aa}); int1 & assump1 -> int2: {B}{aa}; sent7 -> int3: {A}{aa} -> ¬{B}{aa};"
] | UNKNOWN | 4 | null | 5 | 0 | 5 | the brand either hews horsehide or is not a morrow or both. | ({AA}{aa} v ¬{AB}{aa}) | 5 | [] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the fact that the brand hews horsehide or it is not a morrow or both does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that the fact that it is not a glucose but a AFSPC does not hold. sent2: if something does hew horsehide and/or it is not a morrow then it is a sowbread. sent3: the brand does hew horsehide and/or is a morrow. sent4: the brand hews horsehide and/or is not a morrow if the alkapton glazes spermatocyte. sent5: the brand does glaze spermatocyte if there exists something such that it is not a AFSPC. sent6: if the brand is not a kind of a morrow then it is a kind of a sowbread. sent7: if something does glaze spermatocyte it is not a kind of a sowbread. sent8: something is not a glucose but it is a AFSPC. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ | DeductionInstance | if something does hew horsehide and/or it is not a morrow then it is a sowbread. | [
"if something does glaze spermatocyte it is not a kind of a sowbread."
] | [
"if something does hew horsehide and/or it is not a morrow then it is a sowbread."
] |
the probing occurs. | sent1: that the filling does not occur yields that the probe and the combining occurs. sent2: the filling does not occur if the attorneyship does not occur. sent3: the fact that the baas happens and the harmony occurs is false. sent4: if the combine does not occur then the probing does not occur. sent5: if the fact that both the baas and the harmony occurs is not right then the combine does not occur. | {A} | sent1: ¬{C} -> ({A} & {B}) sent2: ¬{D} -> ¬{C} sent3: ¬({AA} & {AB}) sent4: ¬{B} -> ¬{A} sent5: ¬({AA} & {AB}) -> ¬{B} | [
"sent5 & sent3 -> int1: the combine does not occur.; int1 & sent4 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | [
"sent5 & sent3 -> int1: ¬{B}; int1 & sent4 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | the probe occurs. | {A} | 7 | [] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the probing occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: that the filling does not occur yields that the probe and the combining occurs. sent2: the filling does not occur if the attorneyship does not occur. sent3: the fact that the baas happens and the harmony occurs is false. sent4: if the combine does not occur then the probing does not occur. sent5: if the fact that both the baas and the harmony occurs is not right then the combine does not occur. ; $proof$ = | sent5 & sent3 -> int1: the combine does not occur.; int1 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ | DeductionInstance | if the fact that both the baas and the harmony occurs is not right then the combine does not occur. | [
"the fact that the baas happens and the harmony occurs is false.",
"if the combine does not occur then the probing does not occur."
] | [
"The combine doesn't happen if the baas and harmony aren't right.",
"The combine doesn't occur if the baas and harmony aren't right."
] |
the agal is not a blow. | sent1: that the whitecup does not hew soar is not wrong if that it hew soar and it does not dodge carnosaur is not correct. sent2: the agal does not blow if it is non-Bolshevik. sent3: if the whiting is a stocktake then the nasturtium is a stocktake. sent4: there is nothing such that it does hew soar and does not dodge carnosaur. sent5: something is not a blow if it is non-Bolshevik. sent6: if something is a stocktake the fact that it is uncivil hold. sent7: the fact that the agal does glaze trochanter and it is Bolshevik is incorrect if there is something such that it is a battlemented. sent8: something is not a blow if that it glazes trochanter and it is a Bolshevik is incorrect. sent9: there exists something such that it does urinate. sent10: the fact that something is acetonic but it is not a kind of a Bolshevik is not incorrect if it is not a kind of a republic. sent11: the fact that the shoring is not a blow is correct if the fact that it is iridaceous and it is a kind of a bunk does not hold. sent12: if there is something such that it is acetonic and not a Bolshevik the tortoiseshell glazes trochanter. sent13: the fact that the fact that something is not a kind of a Ashton and it is not masonic is not wrong is not right if it does not hew soar. sent14: if something does not diverge tragedian it is a stocktake and it is unfair. sent15: the agal is not a giddiness if the fact that it diverges gymnosophy and it is precise does not hold. sent16: there exists something such that it is ursine. sent17: if something is a kind of a battlemented then that it is a kind of a blow is not wrong. sent18: the runway is not a republic if the fact that the nasturtium is uncivil hold. sent19: if the fact that the whitecup is not a Ashton and it is not masonic does not hold then the whiting does not diverge tragedian. sent20: if there exists something such that it is a schoolboy that the agal is a blow and is cadastral is not correct. | ¬{D}{a} | sent1: ¬({M}{f} & ¬{O}{f}) -> ¬{M}{f} sent2: ¬{C}{a} -> ¬{D}{a} sent3: {H}{e} -> {H}{d} sent4: (x): ¬({M}x & ¬{O}x) sent5: (x): ¬{C}x -> ¬{D}x sent6: (x): {H}x -> {G}x sent7: (x): {A}x -> ¬({B}{a} & {C}{a}) sent8: (x): ¬({B}x & {C}x) -> ¬{D}x sent9: (Ex): {ID}x sent10: (x): ¬{F}x -> ({E}x & ¬{C}x) sent11: ¬({CD}{bo} & {DP}{bo}) -> ¬{D}{bo} sent12: (x): ({E}x & ¬{C}x) -> {B}{b} sent13: (x): ¬{M}x -> ¬(¬{K}x & ¬{L}x) sent14: (x): ¬{J}x -> ({H}x & {I}x) sent15: ¬({AC}{a} & {CP}{a}) -> ¬{AB}{a} sent16: (Ex): {BK}x sent17: (x): {A}x -> {D}x sent18: {G}{d} -> ¬{F}{c} sent19: ¬(¬{K}{f} & ¬{L}{f}) -> ¬{J}{e} sent20: (x): {JK}x -> ¬({D}{a} & {GT}{a}) | [
"sent8 -> int1: if that the agal does glaze trochanter and it is a Bolshevik does not hold it is not a blow.;"
] | UNKNOWN | [
"sent8 -> int1: ¬({B}{a} & {C}{a}) -> ¬{D}{a};"
] | UNKNOWN | 2 | null | 18 | 0 | 18 | the agal is a kind of a blow. | {D}{a} | 15 | [
"sent17 -> int2: if the agal is a kind of a battlemented then it is a kind of a blow.; sent10 -> int3: the runway is acetonic and is not a Bolshevik if it is not a republic.; sent6 -> int4: if the fact that the nasturtium is a kind of a stocktake is right it is uncivil.; sent14 -> int5: the whiting is a stocktake and is unfair if it does not diverge tragedian.; sent13 -> int6: if the whitecup does not hew soar that it is not a Ashton and it is not masonic is not true.; sent4 -> int7: that the whitecup does hew soar and does not dodge carnosaur is incorrect.; sent1 & int7 -> int8: the fact that the whitecup does not hew soar is true.; int6 & int8 -> int9: the fact that the whitecup is not a kind of a Ashton and it is not masonic does not hold.; sent19 & int9 -> int10: the fact that the whiting does not diverge tragedian hold.; int5 & int10 -> int11: the whiting is a kind of a stocktake and it is unfair.; int11 -> int12: the whiting is a kind of a stocktake.; sent3 & int12 -> int13: the nasturtium is a stocktake.; int4 & int13 -> int14: the nasturtium is uncivil.; sent18 & int14 -> int15: the runway is not a republic.; int3 & int15 -> int16: the runway is acetonic thing that is not a Bolshevik.; int16 -> int17: something is both acetonic and non-Bolshevik.; int17 & sent12 -> int18: the fact that the tortoiseshell glazes trochanter is true.; int18 -> int19: there exists something such that it glazes trochanter.;"
] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the agal is not a blow. ; $context$ = sent1: that the whitecup does not hew soar is not wrong if that it hew soar and it does not dodge carnosaur is not correct. sent2: the agal does not blow if it is non-Bolshevik. sent3: if the whiting is a stocktake then the nasturtium is a stocktake. sent4: there is nothing such that it does hew soar and does not dodge carnosaur. sent5: something is not a blow if it is non-Bolshevik. sent6: if something is a stocktake the fact that it is uncivil hold. sent7: the fact that the agal does glaze trochanter and it is Bolshevik is incorrect if there is something such that it is a battlemented. sent8: something is not a blow if that it glazes trochanter and it is a Bolshevik is incorrect. sent9: there exists something such that it does urinate. sent10: the fact that something is acetonic but it is not a kind of a Bolshevik is not incorrect if it is not a kind of a republic. sent11: the fact that the shoring is not a blow is correct if the fact that it is iridaceous and it is a kind of a bunk does not hold. sent12: if there is something such that it is acetonic and not a Bolshevik the tortoiseshell glazes trochanter. sent13: the fact that the fact that something is not a kind of a Ashton and it is not masonic is not wrong is not right if it does not hew soar. sent14: if something does not diverge tragedian it is a stocktake and it is unfair. sent15: the agal is not a giddiness if the fact that it diverges gymnosophy and it is precise does not hold. sent16: there exists something such that it is ursine. sent17: if something is a kind of a battlemented then that it is a kind of a blow is not wrong. sent18: the runway is not a republic if the fact that the nasturtium is uncivil hold. sent19: if the fact that the whitecup is not a Ashton and it is not masonic does not hold then the whiting does not diverge tragedian. sent20: if there exists something such that it is a schoolboy that the agal is a blow and is cadastral is not correct. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ | DeductionInstance | something is not a blow if that it glazes trochanter and it is a Bolshevik is incorrect. | [] | [
"something is not a blow if that it glazes trochanter and it is a Bolshevik is incorrect."
] |
there exists something such that if it is a kind of a steerage then it is Dantean and is not a kind of a packhorse. | sent1: the carcinogen is not non-Dantean but it is not a kind of a packhorse if it is a steerage. sent2: there is something such that if it is a steerage then it is a kind of Dantean thing that is a packhorse. sent3: something is genital and does not glaze inhomogeneity if it is a butacaine. | (Ex): {A}x -> ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) | sent1: {A}{aa} -> ({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) sent2: (Ex): {A}x -> ({AA}x & {AB}x) sent3: (x): {EL}x -> ({BO}x & ¬{DF}x) | [
"sent1 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | [
"sent1 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | there is something such that if it is a kind of a butacaine that it is genital and it does not glaze inhomogeneity is not false. | (Ex): {EL}x -> ({BO}x & ¬{DF}x) | 2 | [
"sent3 -> int1: the grandson is genital and does not glaze inhomogeneity if it is a butacaine.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | PROVED | $hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is a kind of a steerage then it is Dantean and is not a kind of a packhorse. ; $context$ = sent1: the carcinogen is not non-Dantean but it is not a kind of a packhorse if it is a steerage. sent2: there is something such that if it is a steerage then it is a kind of Dantean thing that is a packhorse. sent3: something is genital and does not glaze inhomogeneity if it is a butacaine. ; $proof$ = | sent1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ | DeductionInstance | the carcinogen is not non-Dantean but it is not a kind of a packhorse if it is a steerage. | [] | [
"the carcinogen is not non-Dantean but it is not a kind of a packhorse if it is a steerage."
] |
the fluorochrome is not a breast. | sent1: the fact that the nucellus glazes birdcall is not incorrect. sent2: something is bolometric thing that is not gregarious if it is not a kind of a packrat. sent3: if the girder is not a bruise and/or it is microbial then the fluorochrome is a kind of a Liechtensteiner. sent4: The fact that the birdcall glazes nucellus is not incorrect. sent5: something is a breast if it is Liechtensteiner. sent6: if the fact that something is not archducal is not incorrect it is not a kind of a Liechtensteiner or it is not a kind of a breast or both. sent7: either the girder does not bruise or it is microbial or both if that the nucellus does glaze birdcall is correct. sent8: the yarder bruises. sent9: the fluorochrome is a Saururus and it is a kind of a whipping. sent10: if the fluorochrome is not less and/or it is a whipping the girder is not a kind of a packrat. sent11: something does not breast if it glazes birdcall and it is a Liechtensteiner. sent12: the fact that the nucellus is not archducal if something is bolometric but it is not gregarious is not false. | ¬{C}{c} | sent1: {A}{a} sent2: (x): ¬{G}x -> ({E}x & ¬{F}x) sent3: (¬{AA}{b} v {AB}{b}) -> {B}{c} sent4: {AC}{aa} sent5: (x): {B}x -> {C}x sent6: (x): ¬{D}x -> (¬{B}x v ¬{C}x) sent7: {A}{a} -> (¬{AA}{b} v {AB}{b}) sent8: {AA}{cb} sent9: ({J}{c} & {I}{c}) sent10: (¬{H}{c} v {I}{c}) -> ¬{G}{b} sent11: (x): ({A}x & {B}x) -> ¬{C}x sent12: (x): ({E}x & ¬{F}x) -> ¬{D}{a} | [
"sent7 & sent1 -> int1: the girder does not bruise or is microbial or both.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: that the fluorochrome is Liechtensteiner is true.; sent5 -> int3: the fluorochrome breasts if it is a kind of a Liechtensteiner.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | [
"sent7 & sent1 -> int1: (¬{AA}{b} v {AB}{b}); int1 & sent3 -> int2: {B}{c}; sent5 -> int3: {B}{c} -> {C}{c}; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | 3 | 3 | 8 | 0 | 8 | the bookcase glazes birdcall. | {A}{iu} | 8 | [
"sent6 -> int4: the nucellus is not a Liechtensteiner and/or does not breast if it is not archducal.; sent2 -> int5: the girder is bolometric thing that is ungregarious if it is not a packrat.; sent9 -> int6: the fluorochrome whips.; int6 -> int7: the fluorochrome is not less and/or it is a whipping.; sent10 & int7 -> int8: that the girder is not a packrat is correct.; int5 & int8 -> int9: the girder is bolometric but it is not gregarious.; int9 -> int10: something is bolometric but it is not gregarious.; int10 & sent12 -> int11: the nucellus is not archducal.; int4 & int11 -> int12: the nucellus is not Liechtensteiner or it does not breast or both.;"
] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the fluorochrome is not a breast. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the nucellus glazes birdcall is not incorrect. sent2: something is bolometric thing that is not gregarious if it is not a kind of a packrat. sent3: if the girder is not a bruise and/or it is microbial then the fluorochrome is a kind of a Liechtensteiner. sent4: The fact that the birdcall glazes nucellus is not incorrect. sent5: something is a breast if it is Liechtensteiner. sent6: if the fact that something is not archducal is not incorrect it is not a kind of a Liechtensteiner or it is not a kind of a breast or both. sent7: either the girder does not bruise or it is microbial or both if that the nucellus does glaze birdcall is correct. sent8: the yarder bruises. sent9: the fluorochrome is a Saururus and it is a kind of a whipping. sent10: if the fluorochrome is not less and/or it is a whipping the girder is not a kind of a packrat. sent11: something does not breast if it glazes birdcall and it is a Liechtensteiner. sent12: the fact that the nucellus is not archducal if something is bolometric but it is not gregarious is not false. ; $proof$ = | sent7 & sent1 -> int1: the girder does not bruise or is microbial or both.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: that the fluorochrome is Liechtensteiner is true.; sent5 -> int3: the fluorochrome breasts if it is a kind of a Liechtensteiner.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ | DeductionInstance | either the girder does not bruise or it is microbial or both if that the nucellus does glaze birdcall is correct. | [
"the fact that the nucellus glazes birdcall is not incorrect.",
"if the girder is not a bruise and/or it is microbial then the fluorochrome is a kind of a Liechtensteiner.",
"something is a breast if it is Liechtensteiner."
] | [
"If the nucellus does glaze birdcall, the girder is either microbial or not.",
"If the nucellus does glaze birdcall, the girder does not bruise or it is microbial.",
"If the nucellus does glaze birdcall, then either the girder does not bruise or it is microbial."
] |
the botanical is a kind of non-porcine a ADP. | sent1: that the botanical is porcine and is a ADP does not hold if the invention does not braid. sent2: everything is not spermicidal and it is not a kind of a dog-ear. sent3: if something does not diverge invention then it is entomophilous and a Mesa. sent4: the invention is a kind of a Mesa and does not diverge invention if there exists something such that it is entomophilous. sent5: if the invention is not a braided that the botanical is not porcine but it is a ADP does not hold. sent6: there is something such that it is entomophilous. sent7: if a Mesa does not diverge invention then it does not braid. | (¬{E}{b} & {F}{b}) | sent1: ¬{D}{a} -> ¬({E}{b} & {F}{b}) sent2: (x): (¬{G}x & ¬{H}x) sent3: (x): ¬{C}x -> ({A}x & {B}x) sent4: (x): {A}x -> ({B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) sent5: ¬{D}{a} -> ¬(¬{E}{b} & {F}{b}) sent6: (Ex): {A}x sent7: (x): ({B}x & ¬{C}x) -> ¬{D}x | [
"sent6 & sent4 -> int1: the invention is a kind of a Mesa that does not diverge invention.; sent7 -> int2: if the invention is a Mesa but it does not diverge invention it does not braid.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the invention is not a kind of a braided.; int3 & sent5 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | [
"sent6 & sent4 -> int1: ({B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}); sent7 -> int2: ({B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) -> ¬{D}{a}; int1 & int2 -> int3: ¬{D}{a}; int3 & sent5 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 | the botanical is not porcine but a ADP. | (¬{E}{b} & {F}{b}) | 11 | [
"sent3 -> int4: that the invention is entomophilous and it is a kind of a Mesa is not incorrect if it does not diverge invention.; sent2 -> int5: the fact that the accordionist is non-spermicidal thing that is not a dog-ear is correct.; int5 -> int6: the accordionist is not spermicidal.; int6 -> int7: everything is not spermicidal.; int7 -> int8: that the satirist is not spermicidal is correct.;"
] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the botanical is a kind of non-porcine a ADP. ; $context$ = sent1: that the botanical is porcine and is a ADP does not hold if the invention does not braid. sent2: everything is not spermicidal and it is not a kind of a dog-ear. sent3: if something does not diverge invention then it is entomophilous and a Mesa. sent4: the invention is a kind of a Mesa and does not diverge invention if there exists something such that it is entomophilous. sent5: if the invention is not a braided that the botanical is not porcine but it is a ADP does not hold. sent6: there is something such that it is entomophilous. sent7: if a Mesa does not diverge invention then it does not braid. ; $proof$ = | sent6 & sent4 -> int1: the invention is a kind of a Mesa that does not diverge invention.; sent7 -> int2: if the invention is a Mesa but it does not diverge invention it does not braid.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the invention is not a kind of a braided.; int3 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ | DeductionInstance | there is something such that it is entomophilous. | [
"the invention is a kind of a Mesa and does not diverge invention if there exists something such that it is entomophilous.",
"if a Mesa does not diverge invention then it does not braid.",
"if the invention is not a braided that the botanical is not porcine but it is a ADP does not hold."
] | [
"There is something that is not normal.",
"There is something like that.",
"There is something that is morally reprehensible."
] |
that there is something such that if it is not a domestic the fact that it is not a colander and/or is not a kind of a Kilroy is not true is not false. | sent1: if the truncheon is not domestic then that it is a colander and/or not a Kilroy is not correct. sent2: the truncheon is not a colander or it is not a Kilroy or both if it is not domestic. sent3: that either the truncheon is not a kind of a colander or it is not a Kilroy or both does not hold if it is not a kind of a domestic. sent4: there is something such that if it is not a flatwork that it is not a parterre and/or it does not diverge hilum is wrong. sent5: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a domestic it is a colander. sent6: if the derv is not a kirsch then that it is not azido or it is not a Kilroy or both does not hold. sent7: the fact that something does not diverge soar or it is not a kind of a bookcase or both is false if it is not antecubital. sent8: that either something does not glaze Tamarix or it is not a stump or both is false if it is not a kind of a pilferer. sent9: there exists something such that if it is a rya then the fact that it is not a kind of an efferent and/or it is not chauvinistic is wrong. sent10: there is something such that if it is not domestic the fact that it is a colander and/or it is not a kind of a Kilroy is incorrect. sent11: if that the truncheon is not domestic is not wrong the fact that either it is not pharmacological or it is not quartzose or both does not hold. sent12: there is something such that if the fact that it is not a domestic is right it is either not a colander or not a Kilroy or both. sent13: the truncheon is a Kilroy if it is not a kind of a domestic. sent14: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a domestic then that it is not a colander and/or it is a kind of a Kilroy is not true. sent15: that either the truncheon is not a kind of a colander or it is not a kind of a Kilroy or both is not right if it is a domestic. sent16: the fact that the truncheon is not a airmailer and/or it is not a dip is wrong if it is not a domestic. sent17: there is something such that if it is not a domestic then it is a Kilroy. | (Ex): ¬{A}x -> ¬(¬{AA}x v ¬{AB}x) | sent1: ¬{A}{aa} -> ¬({AA}{aa} v ¬{AB}{aa}) sent2: ¬{A}{aa} -> (¬{AA}{aa} v ¬{AB}{aa}) sent3: ¬{A}{aa} -> ¬(¬{AA}{aa} v ¬{AB}{aa}) sent4: (Ex): ¬{K}x -> ¬(¬{IP}x v ¬{O}x) sent5: (Ex): ¬{A}x -> {AA}x sent6: ¬{B}{hg} -> ¬(¬{DS}{hg} v ¬{AB}{hg}) sent7: (x): ¬{BU}x -> ¬(¬{CK}x v ¬{GC}x) sent8: (x): ¬{CQ}x -> ¬(¬{HE}x v ¬{AS}x) sent9: (Ex): {DK}x -> ¬(¬{BO}x v ¬{IB}x) sent10: (Ex): ¬{A}x -> ¬({AA}x v ¬{AB}x) sent11: ¬{A}{aa} -> ¬(¬{AD}{aa} v ¬{DH}{aa}) sent12: (Ex): ¬{A}x -> (¬{AA}x v ¬{AB}x) sent13: ¬{A}{aa} -> {AB}{aa} sent14: (Ex): ¬{A}x -> ¬(¬{AA}x v {AB}x) sent15: {A}{aa} -> ¬(¬{AA}{aa} v ¬{AB}{aa}) sent16: ¬{A}{aa} -> ¬(¬{FG}{aa} v ¬{JJ}{aa}) sent17: (Ex): ¬{A}x -> {AB}x | [
"sent3 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | [
"sent3 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | 1 | 1 | 16 | 0 | 16 | there exists something such that if it is not antecubital then the fact that it does not diverge soar or is not a bookcase or both is not true. | (Ex): ¬{BU}x -> ¬(¬{CK}x v ¬{GC}x) | 2 | [
"sent7 -> int1: the fact that the nasturtium does not diverge soar or is not a bookcase or both is not true if it is not antecubital.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | PROVED | $hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if it is not a domestic the fact that it is not a colander and/or is not a kind of a Kilroy is not true is not false. ; $context$ = sent1: if the truncheon is not domestic then that it is a colander and/or not a Kilroy is not correct. sent2: the truncheon is not a colander or it is not a Kilroy or both if it is not domestic. sent3: that either the truncheon is not a kind of a colander or it is not a Kilroy or both does not hold if it is not a kind of a domestic. sent4: there is something such that if it is not a flatwork that it is not a parterre and/or it does not diverge hilum is wrong. sent5: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a domestic it is a colander. sent6: if the derv is not a kirsch then that it is not azido or it is not a Kilroy or both does not hold. sent7: the fact that something does not diverge soar or it is not a kind of a bookcase or both is false if it is not antecubital. sent8: that either something does not glaze Tamarix or it is not a stump or both is false if it is not a kind of a pilferer. sent9: there exists something such that if it is a rya then the fact that it is not a kind of an efferent and/or it is not chauvinistic is wrong. sent10: there is something such that if it is not domestic the fact that it is a colander and/or it is not a kind of a Kilroy is incorrect. sent11: if that the truncheon is not domestic is not wrong the fact that either it is not pharmacological or it is not quartzose or both does not hold. sent12: there is something such that if the fact that it is not a domestic is right it is either not a colander or not a Kilroy or both. sent13: the truncheon is a Kilroy if it is not a kind of a domestic. sent14: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a domestic then that it is not a colander and/or it is a kind of a Kilroy is not true. sent15: that either the truncheon is not a kind of a colander or it is not a kind of a Kilroy or both is not right if it is a domestic. sent16: the fact that the truncheon is not a airmailer and/or it is not a dip is wrong if it is not a domestic. sent17: there is something such that if it is not a domestic then it is a Kilroy. ; $proof$ = | sent3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ | DeductionInstance | that either the truncheon is not a kind of a colander or it is not a Kilroy or both does not hold if it is not a kind of a domestic. | [] | [
"that either the truncheon is not a kind of a colander or it is not a Kilroy or both does not hold if it is not a kind of a domestic."
] |
there is something such that if it is not a plain it is a kind of a nogging. | sent1: if something is non-crude it crochets. sent2: if something is not an ethology then it is acyclic. sent3: the collection is a nogging if it is a plain. sent4: if something is a kind of a plain then it is a kind of a nogging. sent5: there exists something such that if it is a plain it is a nogging. sent6: something networks if it is not aponeurotic. sent7: the sidebar is a nogging if it is not deflationary. sent8: if something is not a grandstand then it hews Godunov. | (Ex): ¬{B}x -> {C}x | sent1: (x): ¬{CO}x -> {M}x sent2: (x): ¬{BO}x -> {CK}x sent3: {B}{aa} -> {C}{aa} sent4: (x): {B}x -> {C}x sent5: (Ex): {B}x -> {C}x sent6: (x): ¬{BM}x -> {CC}x sent7: ¬{AC}{fn} -> {C}{fn} sent8: (x): ¬{AF}x -> {R}x | [] | UNKNOWN | [] | UNKNOWN | 2 | null | 8 | 0 | 8 | there exists something such that if it is not a kind of an ethology then it is acyclic. | (Ex): ¬{BO}x -> {CK}x | 2 | [
"sent2 -> int1: the deterioration is acyclic if it is not an ethology.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | PROVED | $hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is not a plain it is a kind of a nogging. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is non-crude it crochets. sent2: if something is not an ethology then it is acyclic. sent3: the collection is a nogging if it is a plain. sent4: if something is a kind of a plain then it is a kind of a nogging. sent5: there exists something such that if it is a plain it is a nogging. sent6: something networks if it is not aponeurotic. sent7: the sidebar is a nogging if it is not deflationary. sent8: if something is not a grandstand then it hews Godunov. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ | DeductionInstance | the sidebar is a nogging if it is not deflationary. | [
"if something is not an ethology then it is acyclic."
] | [
"the sidebar is a nogging if it is not deflationary."
] |
the recording is pleomorphic. | sent1: the recording is a vestal and is a heroism. sent2: if the fisherman is painful then the clout is an honor. sent3: that the clout is canonic and it diverges allele is wrong. sent4: the sandbox honors if something is painful and/or it does not cross. sent5: the recording explains and it is a terminal. sent6: the Scribe is an honor. sent7: if the clout is a kind of an honor then the recording honor. sent8: something is painful and/or is not a kind of a crossed if it does not hew deactivation. sent9: the recording does dodge mortmain. sent10: the fact that the feel is both pleomorphic and a Princeton is not incorrect. sent11: the moonbeam is pleomorphic. sent12: there is something such that that it does not hew deactivation and it diverges allele is wrong. sent13: the recording honors. sent14: if the fact that the clout is canonic and it does diverge allele is false it does not hew deactivation. sent15: the follicle is a touched and it does diverge Barthelme. sent16: the fisherman is painful if there exists something such that that it does not hew deactivation and it does diverge allele does not hold. sent17: the recording honors and it is pleomorphic. | {B}{a} | sent1: ({FP}{a} & {HA}{a}) sent2: {D}{d} -> {A}{c} sent3: ¬({G}{c} & {F}{c}) sent4: (x): ({D}x v ¬{C}x) -> {A}{b} sent5: ({GC}{a} & {JI}{a}) sent6: {A}{ad} sent7: {A}{c} -> {A}{a} sent8: (x): ¬{E}x -> ({D}x v ¬{C}x) sent9: {AM}{a} sent10: ({B}{gl} & {AA}{gl}) sent11: {B}{bq} sent12: (Ex): ¬(¬{E}x & {F}x) sent13: {A}{a} sent14: ¬({G}{c} & {F}{c}) -> ¬{E}{c} sent15: ({CC}{gc} & {JK}{gc}) sent16: (x): ¬(¬{E}x & {F}x) -> {D}{d} sent17: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) | [
"sent17 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | [
"sent17 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | 1 | 1 | 16 | 0 | 16 | the recording is not pleomorphic. | ¬{B}{a} | 7 | [
"sent8 -> int1: if the clout does not hew deactivation either it is painful or it is not a kind of a crossed or both.; sent14 & sent3 -> int2: the clout does not hew deactivation.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the clout is painful and/or it does not cross.; int3 -> int4: something is painful and/or it does not cross.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: the sandbox is an honor.; int5 -> int6: there is something such that it is an honor.;"
] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the recording is pleomorphic. ; $context$ = sent1: the recording is a vestal and is a heroism. sent2: if the fisherman is painful then the clout is an honor. sent3: that the clout is canonic and it diverges allele is wrong. sent4: the sandbox honors if something is painful and/or it does not cross. sent5: the recording explains and it is a terminal. sent6: the Scribe is an honor. sent7: if the clout is a kind of an honor then the recording honor. sent8: something is painful and/or is not a kind of a crossed if it does not hew deactivation. sent9: the recording does dodge mortmain. sent10: the fact that the feel is both pleomorphic and a Princeton is not incorrect. sent11: the moonbeam is pleomorphic. sent12: there is something such that that it does not hew deactivation and it diverges allele is wrong. sent13: the recording honors. sent14: if the fact that the clout is canonic and it does diverge allele is false it does not hew deactivation. sent15: the follicle is a touched and it does diverge Barthelme. sent16: the fisherman is painful if there exists something such that that it does not hew deactivation and it does diverge allele does not hold. sent17: the recording honors and it is pleomorphic. ; $proof$ = | sent17 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ | DeductionInstance | the recording honors and it is pleomorphic. | [] | [
"the recording honors and it is pleomorphic."
] |
if the fact that the buckskin is not hot and it is not Goethean is not right it is not an exponential. | sent1: something is not Goethean if that it is not celiac and it is not a bottle does not hold. sent2: something is not an exponential if the fact that it is not hot and it is not Goethean is false. | ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> ¬{B}{aa} | sent1: (x): ¬(¬{DH}x & ¬{IH}x) -> ¬{AB}x sent2: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> ¬{B}x | [
"sent2 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | [
"sent2 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | if that the proturan is not celiac and is not a bottle does not hold then it is not Goethean. | ¬(¬{DH}{cp} & ¬{IH}{cp}) -> ¬{AB}{cp} | 1 | [
"sent1 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | PROVED | $hypothesis$ = if the fact that the buckskin is not hot and it is not Goethean is not right it is not an exponential. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not Goethean if that it is not celiac and it is not a bottle does not hold. sent2: something is not an exponential if the fact that it is not hot and it is not Goethean is false. ; $proof$ = | sent2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ | DeductionInstance | something is not an exponential if the fact that it is not hot and it is not Goethean is false. | [] | [
"something is not an exponential if the fact that it is not hot and it is not Goethean is false."
] |
the half-sister is not a grad. | sent1: if there is something such that it dodges Tamarix the half-sister is a grad. sent2: if the ferroconcrete does not hew booger then it is not a kind of a Purim or is not a kind of a endospore or both. sent3: the ferroconcrete is a kind of a grad. sent4: the half-sister does glaze seam and/or it hews radiogram. sent5: the ferroconcrete is a grad if something dodges Tamarix and/or is concessive. sent6: something is not a kind of a grad if it does dodge Tamarix. sent7: something is concessive or is a grad or both. sent8: the ferroconcrete does dodge Tamarix and/or it is a grad. sent9: if the ferroconcrete is a kind of a Carolingian that is not a Purim then the half-sister is not a Purim. sent10: the rheumatic does not diverge Patwin. sent11: the ferroconcrete is concessive and/or it is a grad. sent12: if either something is not a Purim or it is not a kind of a endospore or both then it is not a Purim. sent13: if something is concessive and/or it does dodge Tamarix then the ferroconcrete is a grad. sent14: the ferroconcrete is a Carolingian if the rheumatic does not hew Gladstone and is a trunk. sent15: something does not hew Gladstone but it is a trunk if it does not diverge Patwin. sent16: that the ferroconcrete is concessive is not wrong. sent17: the half-sister is a grad if there exists something such that it does dodge Tamarix or it is concessive or both. sent18: if something is not a Purim it is concessive and dodges Tamarix. sent19: if something is pictographic and/or it is a kind of a hickory then the half-sister is concessive. sent20: the half-sister does glaze impulsiveness. sent21: the half-sister is a kind of a fizz if that something is concessive or it glazes ADP or both hold. sent22: there is something such that either it is a musculature or it is a fluorescence or both. | ¬{C}{b} | sent1: (x): {A}x -> {C}{b} sent2: ¬{I}{a} -> (¬{D}{a} v ¬{J}{a}) sent3: {C}{a} sent4: ({FJ}{b} v {GB}{b}) sent5: (x): ({A}x v {B}x) -> {C}{a} sent6: (x): {A}x -> ¬{C}x sent7: (Ex): ({B}x v {C}x) sent8: ({A}{a} v {C}{a}) sent9: ({F}{a} & ¬{D}{a}) -> ¬{D}{b} sent10: ¬{H}{c} sent11: ({B}{a} v {C}{a}) sent12: (x): (¬{D}x v ¬{J}x) -> ¬{D}x sent13: (x): ({B}x v {A}x) -> {C}{a} sent14: (¬{E}{c} & {G}{c}) -> {F}{a} sent15: (x): ¬{H}x -> (¬{E}x & {G}x) sent16: {B}{a} sent17: (x): ({A}x v {B}x) -> {C}{b} sent18: (x): ¬{D}x -> ({B}x & {A}x) sent19: (x): ({CU}x v {GG}x) -> {B}{b} sent20: {IK}{b} sent21: (x): ({B}x v {CL}x) -> {ET}{b} sent22: (Ex): ({EA}x v {CJ}x) | [
"sent16 -> int1: either the ferroconcrete does dodge Tamarix or it is concessive or both.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that it does dodge Tamarix and/or it is concessive.; int2 & sent17 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | [
"sent16 -> int1: ({A}{a} v {B}{a}); int1 -> int2: (Ex): ({A}x v {B}x); int2 & sent17 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | 3 | 3 | 20 | 0 | 20 | the half-sister is not a grad. | ¬{C}{b} | 8 | [
"sent6 -> int3: if the half-sister dodges Tamarix then it is not a kind of a grad.; sent18 -> int4: the half-sister is concessive and it does dodge Tamarix if it is not a Purim.; sent15 -> int5: the rheumatic does not hew Gladstone but it is a trunk if it does not diverge Patwin.; int5 & sent10 -> int6: the rheumatic does not hew Gladstone and is a kind of a trunk.; sent14 & int6 -> int7: the ferroconcrete is a Carolingian.; sent12 -> int8: if the ferroconcrete is not a Purim and/or it is not a endospore then it is not a Purim.;"
] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the half-sister is not a grad. ; $context$ = sent1: if there is something such that it dodges Tamarix the half-sister is a grad. sent2: if the ferroconcrete does not hew booger then it is not a kind of a Purim or is not a kind of a endospore or both. sent3: the ferroconcrete is a kind of a grad. sent4: the half-sister does glaze seam and/or it hews radiogram. sent5: the ferroconcrete is a grad if something dodges Tamarix and/or is concessive. sent6: something is not a kind of a grad if it does dodge Tamarix. sent7: something is concessive or is a grad or both. sent8: the ferroconcrete does dodge Tamarix and/or it is a grad. sent9: if the ferroconcrete is a kind of a Carolingian that is not a Purim then the half-sister is not a Purim. sent10: the rheumatic does not diverge Patwin. sent11: the ferroconcrete is concessive and/or it is a grad. sent12: if either something is not a Purim or it is not a kind of a endospore or both then it is not a Purim. sent13: if something is concessive and/or it does dodge Tamarix then the ferroconcrete is a grad. sent14: the ferroconcrete is a Carolingian if the rheumatic does not hew Gladstone and is a trunk. sent15: something does not hew Gladstone but it is a trunk if it does not diverge Patwin. sent16: that the ferroconcrete is concessive is not wrong. sent17: the half-sister is a grad if there exists something such that it does dodge Tamarix or it is concessive or both. sent18: if something is not a Purim it is concessive and dodges Tamarix. sent19: if something is pictographic and/or it is a kind of a hickory then the half-sister is concessive. sent20: the half-sister does glaze impulsiveness. sent21: the half-sister is a kind of a fizz if that something is concessive or it glazes ADP or both hold. sent22: there is something such that either it is a musculature or it is a fluorescence or both. ; $proof$ = | sent16 -> int1: either the ferroconcrete does dodge Tamarix or it is concessive or both.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that it does dodge Tamarix and/or it is concessive.; int2 & sent17 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ | DeductionInstance | that the ferroconcrete is concessive is not wrong. | [
"the half-sister is a grad if there exists something such that it does dodge Tamarix or it is concessive or both."
] | [
"that the ferroconcrete is concessive is not wrong."
] |
the diverging astrologer does not occur and the tailgating does not occur. | sent1: either the radiance occurs or the Guatemalan happens or both. sent2: the equivocation does not occur and the glazing Craigie does not occur. sent3: that the radiance occurs leads to the Tyroleanness. sent4: that the diverging astrologer does not occur and the tailgate does not occur is right if the Tyrolean occurs. sent5: if the diverging encolure does not occur then the decrepitation occurs and the hewing treasury happens. sent6: the Guatemalanness does not occur if both the hostile and the decrepitation occurs. sent7: if the fact that the Guatemalan does not occur is not false then that both the Tyroleanness and the radiance happens is not right. sent8: the tallness does not occur if that the bicapsularness happens and the placement does not occur does not hold. sent9: the permanentness does not occur. sent10: the fact that if the fact that the promulgation but not the hewing adrenalectomy happens is false then the diverging breakable occurs is right. sent11: if the fact that the Tyroleanness occurs is true then the fact that the tailgating does not occur is true. sent12: that the tallness does not occur causes that the hostileness and the fleecing happens. sent13: if the nonreturnableness and the diverging breakable occurs then the diverging encolure does not occur. sent14: if the permanentness does not occur and/or the diverging Bruckner does not occur the diverging Bruckner does not occur. sent15: the insurrectionalness does not occur and the establishment does not occur. sent16: if the radiance does not occur then that the diverging astrologer does not occur and the tailgate does not occur is false. sent17: the fact that the nonreturnableness occurs is not false. sent18: if the jackknife does not occur then that the promulgation occurs but the hewing adrenalectomy does not occur is incorrect. sent19: the fact that the Tyrolean happens is not false if the Guatemalanness occurs. sent20: that the bicapsularness occurs and the placement does not occur is incorrect if the diverging Bruckner does not occur. sent21: the tailgating does not occur. | (¬{E} & ¬{D}) | sent1: ({A} v {B}) sent2: (¬{AO} & ¬{FR}) sent3: {A} -> {C} sent4: {C} -> (¬{E} & ¬{D}) sent5: ¬{I} -> ({G} & {H}) sent6: ({F} & {G}) -> ¬{B} sent7: ¬{B} -> ¬({C} & {A}) sent8: ¬({Q} & ¬{P}) -> ¬{M} sent9: ¬{U} sent10: ¬({N} & ¬{O}) -> {J} sent11: {C} -> ¬{D} sent12: ¬{M} -> ({F} & {L}) sent13: ({K} & {J}) -> ¬{I} sent14: (¬{U} v ¬{R}) -> ¬{R} sent15: (¬{BL} & ¬{CU}) sent16: ¬{A} -> ¬(¬{E} & ¬{D}) sent17: {K} sent18: ¬{S} -> ¬({N} & ¬{O}) sent19: {B} -> {C} sent20: ¬{R} -> ¬({Q} & ¬{P}) sent21: ¬{D} | [
"sent1 & sent3 & sent19 -> int1: the Tyrolean happens.; int1 & sent4 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | [
"sent1 & sent3 & sent19 -> int1: {C}; int1 & sent4 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | 2 | 2 | 17 | 0 | 17 | the fact that the diverging astrologer does not occur and the tailgating does not occur is false. | ¬(¬{E} & ¬{D}) | 12 | [
"sent9 -> int2: that the permanent does not occur or the diverging Bruckner does not occur or both hold.; sent14 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the diverging Bruckner does not occur is right.; sent20 & int3 -> int4: that the bicapsularness but not the placement occurs does not hold.; sent8 & int4 -> int5: the tallness does not occur.; sent12 & int5 -> int6: the hostile occurs and the fleecing happens.; int6 -> int7: the hostile happens.;"
] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the diverging astrologer does not occur and the tailgating does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: either the radiance occurs or the Guatemalan happens or both. sent2: the equivocation does not occur and the glazing Craigie does not occur. sent3: that the radiance occurs leads to the Tyroleanness. sent4: that the diverging astrologer does not occur and the tailgate does not occur is right if the Tyrolean occurs. sent5: if the diverging encolure does not occur then the decrepitation occurs and the hewing treasury happens. sent6: the Guatemalanness does not occur if both the hostile and the decrepitation occurs. sent7: if the fact that the Guatemalan does not occur is not false then that both the Tyroleanness and the radiance happens is not right. sent8: the tallness does not occur if that the bicapsularness happens and the placement does not occur does not hold. sent9: the permanentness does not occur. sent10: the fact that if the fact that the promulgation but not the hewing adrenalectomy happens is false then the diverging breakable occurs is right. sent11: if the fact that the Tyroleanness occurs is true then the fact that the tailgating does not occur is true. sent12: that the tallness does not occur causes that the hostileness and the fleecing happens. sent13: if the nonreturnableness and the diverging breakable occurs then the diverging encolure does not occur. sent14: if the permanentness does not occur and/or the diverging Bruckner does not occur the diverging Bruckner does not occur. sent15: the insurrectionalness does not occur and the establishment does not occur. sent16: if the radiance does not occur then that the diverging astrologer does not occur and the tailgate does not occur is false. sent17: the fact that the nonreturnableness occurs is not false. sent18: if the jackknife does not occur then that the promulgation occurs but the hewing adrenalectomy does not occur is incorrect. sent19: the fact that the Tyrolean happens is not false if the Guatemalanness occurs. sent20: that the bicapsularness occurs and the placement does not occur is incorrect if the diverging Bruckner does not occur. sent21: the tailgating does not occur. ; $proof$ = | sent1 & sent3 & sent19 -> int1: the Tyrolean happens.; int1 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ | DeductionInstance | either the radiance occurs or the Guatemalan happens or both. | [
"that the radiance occurs leads to the Tyroleanness.",
"the fact that the Tyrolean happens is not false if the Guatemalanness occurs.",
"that the diverging astrologer does not occur and the tailgate does not occur is right if the Tyrolean occurs."
] | [
"Either the Guatemalan happens or the radiance occurs.",
"Either the Guatemalan happens or the radiance happens.",
"Either the Guatemalan occurs or the radiance occurs."
] |
there is something such that if it does not light then that it does not hew tallness and it is aleuronic does not hold. | sent1: there exists something such that if it is peaceful then the fact that it is not proconsular and it is a routemarch does not hold. sent2: that the tough does not hew tallness but it is aleuronic is false if it is a kind of a light. sent3: the fact that the tough does hew tallness and it is aleuronic is not true if it does not light. sent4: there exists something such that if it does not light it does not hew tallness and it is aleuronic. sent5: that the tough does not hew tallness and is aleuronic is incorrect if it is not light. sent6: that something does not glaze ecumenism and is mores is not true if it does not glaze sawdust. sent7: that there exists something such that if it does light that it does not hew tallness and it is aleuronic is wrong is true. sent8: there exists something such that if that it does not diverge Dirca is not wrong that it is not achondroplastic and it does undulate does not hold. sent9: if the arctiid hews tallness the fact that it is not a kind of an executioner and is bardic does not hold. sent10: there is something such that if it is not a light the fact that it hews tallness and is aleuronic is false. sent11: the fact that the switchboard is not aleuronic and glazes Megatherium is not true if that it is not a wineberry hold. sent12: the fact that something does not light but it does strain is wrong if it does not glaze stupidity. sent13: if the tough is not a kind of a light it does not hew tallness and it is aleuronic. | (Ex): ¬{A}x -> ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) | sent1: (Ex): {B}x -> ¬(¬{II}x & {BD}x) sent2: {A}{aa} -> ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) sent3: ¬{A}{aa} -> ¬({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) sent4: (Ex): ¬{A}x -> (¬{AA}x & {AB}x) sent5: ¬{A}{aa} -> ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) sent6: (x): ¬{IR}x -> ¬(¬{JJ}x & {JA}x) sent7: (Ex): {A}x -> ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) sent8: (Ex): ¬{FO}x -> ¬(¬{HF}x & {DI}x) sent9: {AA}{au} -> ¬(¬{F}{au} & {GO}{au}) sent10: (Ex): ¬{A}x -> ¬({AA}x & {AB}x) sent11: ¬{P}{hq} -> ¬(¬{AB}{hq} & {R}{hq}) sent12: (x): ¬{AE}x -> ¬(¬{A}x & {BM}x) sent13: ¬{A}{aa} -> (¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) | [
"sent5 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | [
"sent5 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | 1 | 1 | 12 | 0 | 12 | if the tough does not glaze sawdust then that it does not glaze ecumenism and it is mores does not hold. | ¬{IR}{aa} -> ¬(¬{JJ}{aa} & {JA}{aa}) | 1 | [
"sent6 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | PROVED | $hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it does not light then that it does not hew tallness and it is aleuronic does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it is peaceful then the fact that it is not proconsular and it is a routemarch does not hold. sent2: that the tough does not hew tallness but it is aleuronic is false if it is a kind of a light. sent3: the fact that the tough does hew tallness and it is aleuronic is not true if it does not light. sent4: there exists something such that if it does not light it does not hew tallness and it is aleuronic. sent5: that the tough does not hew tallness and is aleuronic is incorrect if it is not light. sent6: that something does not glaze ecumenism and is mores is not true if it does not glaze sawdust. sent7: that there exists something such that if it does light that it does not hew tallness and it is aleuronic is wrong is true. sent8: there exists something such that if that it does not diverge Dirca is not wrong that it is not achondroplastic and it does undulate does not hold. sent9: if the arctiid hews tallness the fact that it is not a kind of an executioner and is bardic does not hold. sent10: there is something such that if it is not a light the fact that it hews tallness and is aleuronic is false. sent11: the fact that the switchboard is not aleuronic and glazes Megatherium is not true if that it is not a wineberry hold. sent12: the fact that something does not light but it does strain is wrong if it does not glaze stupidity. sent13: if the tough is not a kind of a light it does not hew tallness and it is aleuronic. ; $proof$ = | sent5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ | DeductionInstance | that the tough does not hew tallness and is aleuronic is incorrect if it is not light. | [] | [
"that the tough does not hew tallness and is aleuronic is incorrect if it is not light."
] |
the mulligan does not glaze heterotroph. | sent1: if there is something such that that it is a kind of macrocephalic thing that is expansionist is incorrect that the mulligan is apoplectic hold. sent2: if something that is apoplectic is a kind of a dick it does not glaze heterotroph. sent3: that the heterotroph is not a dick or it does glaze censoring or both is false. sent4: the heterotroph is a dick. sent5: the mulligan is a dick if that the heterotroph is not a dick or it glazes censoring or both is not true. sent6: if the fact that that the heterotroph is a dick or it does glaze censoring or both is right is not true that the mulligan is a dick is correct. | ¬{C}{a} | sent1: (x): ¬({AA}x & {AB}x) -> {A}{a} sent2: (x): ({A}x & {B}x) -> ¬{C}x sent3: ¬(¬{B}{b} v {E}{b}) sent4: {B}{b} sent5: ¬(¬{B}{b} v {E}{b}) -> {B}{a} sent6: ¬({B}{b} v {E}{b}) -> {B}{a} | [
"sent5 & sent3 -> int1: the mulligan is a dick.; sent2 -> int2: if the mulligan is apoplectic and it is a dick the fact that it does not glaze heterotroph is not false.;"
] | UNKNOWN | [
"sent5 & sent3 -> int1: {B}{a}; sent2 -> int2: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) -> ¬{C}{a};"
] | UNKNOWN | 3 | null | 2 | 0 | 2 | null | null | null | [] | null | null | $hypothesis$ = the mulligan does not glaze heterotroph. ; $context$ = sent1: if there is something such that that it is a kind of macrocephalic thing that is expansionist is incorrect that the mulligan is apoplectic hold. sent2: if something that is apoplectic is a kind of a dick it does not glaze heterotroph. sent3: that the heterotroph is not a dick or it does glaze censoring or both is false. sent4: the heterotroph is a dick. sent5: the mulligan is a dick if that the heterotroph is not a dick or it glazes censoring or both is not true. sent6: if the fact that that the heterotroph is a dick or it does glaze censoring or both is right is not true that the mulligan is a dick is correct. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ | DeductionInstance | the mulligan is a dick if that the heterotroph is not a dick or it glazes censoring or both is not true. | [
"that the heterotroph is not a dick or it does glaze censoring or both is false.",
"if something that is apoplectic is a kind of a dick it does not glaze heterotroph."
] | [
"The Heterotroph is a dick if it is not a dick or if it is not true.",
"The Heterotroph is a dick if it is not a dick or if it is not a dick at all."
] |
the metharbital is a gametoecium but it is not a Eck. | sent1: there is something such that it does dodge curate. sent2: if the fact that something is not a kind of a undercoated and does dodge curate is not right then it is not a Eck. sent3: that the metharbital does not whale but it is a kind of a cross-purpose is not true. sent4: if there is something such that it does not dodge curate the fizz is not a undercoated. sent5: the metharbital does not diverge equation if the fact that it is not a whale and it is a kind of a cross-purpose is not correct. sent6: there exists something such that that it does not dodge curate hold. sent7: if something is a gametoecium then that it is not a undercoated and dodges curate is incorrect. sent8: the metharbital is a gametoecium that is not a kind of a Eck if the fizz does dodge curate. sent9: the fact that the metharbital is a kind of a gametoecium but it is not a Eck is not true if that the fizz is not a undercoated is not wrong. sent10: there exists something such that it is not a undercoated. sent11: if there exists something such that the fact that it is stemmatic and it is a neuroplasty does not hold then the fact that the fizz is not relevant is not incorrect. sent12: if something does not diverge equation the fact that it is stemmatic and is a neuroplasty does not hold. sent13: something is a degradation and it is a gametoecium if it is not relevant. | ({C}{b} & ¬{D}{b}) | sent1: (Ex): {A}x sent2: (x): ¬(¬{B}x & {A}x) -> ¬{D}x sent3: ¬(¬{K}{b} & {J}{b}) sent4: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬{B}{a} sent5: ¬(¬{K}{b} & {J}{b}) -> ¬{I}{b} sent6: (Ex): ¬{A}x sent7: (x): {C}x -> ¬(¬{B}x & {A}x) sent8: {A}{a} -> ({C}{b} & ¬{D}{b}) sent9: ¬{B}{a} -> ¬({C}{b} & ¬{D}{b}) sent10: (Ex): ¬{B}x sent11: (x): ¬({H}x & {G}x) -> ¬{F}{a} sent12: (x): ¬{I}x -> ¬({H}x & {G}x) sent13: (x): ¬{F}x -> ({E}x & {C}x) | [
"sent6 & sent4 -> int1: the fizz is not a undercoated.; sent9 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | [
"sent6 & sent4 -> int1: ¬{B}{a}; sent9 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | 2 | 2 | 10 | 0 | 10 | the fizz is not a Eck. | ¬{D}{a} | 8 | [
"sent2 -> int2: if that the fizz is not a undercoated and dodges curate is false then it is not a Eck.; sent7 -> int3: if the fizz is a gametoecium then the fact that it is not a undercoated and it dodges curate is incorrect.; sent13 -> int4: if the fizz is not relevant it is a degradation and it is a gametoecium.; sent12 -> int5: the fact that the metharbital is both stemmatic and a neuroplasty is not correct if that it does not diverge equation is not incorrect.; sent5 & sent3 -> int6: the metharbital does not diverge equation.; int5 & int6 -> int7: that the metharbital is stemmatic and it is a neuroplasty is incorrect.; int7 -> int8: there exists something such that the fact that it is stemmatic and it is a kind of a neuroplasty does not hold.; int8 & sent11 -> int9: that the fizz is not relevant is not wrong.; int4 & int9 -> int10: the fizz is a kind of a degradation that is a gametoecium.; int10 -> int11: the fizz is a gametoecium.; int3 & int11 -> int12: the fact that the fizz is not a kind of a undercoated and does dodge curate is not correct.; int2 & int12 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | PROVED | $hypothesis$ = the metharbital is a gametoecium but it is not a Eck. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that it does dodge curate. sent2: if the fact that something is not a kind of a undercoated and does dodge curate is not right then it is not a Eck. sent3: that the metharbital does not whale but it is a kind of a cross-purpose is not true. sent4: if there is something such that it does not dodge curate the fizz is not a undercoated. sent5: the metharbital does not diverge equation if the fact that it is not a whale and it is a kind of a cross-purpose is not correct. sent6: there exists something such that that it does not dodge curate hold. sent7: if something is a gametoecium then that it is not a undercoated and dodges curate is incorrect. sent8: the metharbital is a gametoecium that is not a kind of a Eck if the fizz does dodge curate. sent9: the fact that the metharbital is a kind of a gametoecium but it is not a Eck is not true if that the fizz is not a undercoated is not wrong. sent10: there exists something such that it is not a undercoated. sent11: if there exists something such that the fact that it is stemmatic and it is a neuroplasty does not hold then the fact that the fizz is not relevant is not incorrect. sent12: if something does not diverge equation the fact that it is stemmatic and is a neuroplasty does not hold. sent13: something is a degradation and it is a gametoecium if it is not relevant. ; $proof$ = | sent6 & sent4 -> int1: the fizz is not a undercoated.; sent9 & int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ | DeductionInstance | there exists something such that that it does not dodge curate hold. | [
"if there is something such that it does not dodge curate the fizz is not a undercoated.",
"the fact that the metharbital is a kind of a gametoecium but it is not a Eck is not true if that the fizz is not a undercoated is not wrong."
] | [
"There is something that does not dodge hold.",
"There is something that does not dodge the hold."
] |
the thyroprotein is not a Mosaic. | sent1: if something is perigonal it dodges exchanged. sent2: the thyroprotein is not a hostilities but it is a crossjack. sent3: the thyroprotein is nectar-rich if it is not a hostilities and it is a crossjack. sent4: if the phyllo is not a buttocks the fact that either the ratite is not a flintstone or it is nectar-rich or both is incorrect. sent5: if something is nectar-rich it is a kind of a Mosaic. sent6: if the curb is a flintstone and a Mosaic that it does hew Clemenceau is right. | ¬{A}{a} | sent1: (x): {EI}x -> {JH}x sent2: (¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) sent3: (¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> {B}{a} sent4: ¬{D}{c} -> ¬(¬{C}{b} v {B}{b}) sent5: (x): {B}x -> {A}x sent6: ({C}{iu} & {A}{iu}) -> {AG}{iu} | [
"sent3 & sent2 -> int1: the thyroprotein is nectar-rich.; sent5 -> int2: if the thyroprotein is nectar-rich then it is a kind of a Mosaic.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | [
"sent3 & sent2 -> int1: {B}{a}; sent5 -> int2: {B}{a} -> {A}{a}; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | 2 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 3 | the thyroprotein is not a kind of a Mosaic. | ¬{A}{a} | 6 | [] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the thyroprotein is not a Mosaic. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is perigonal it dodges exchanged. sent2: the thyroprotein is not a hostilities but it is a crossjack. sent3: the thyroprotein is nectar-rich if it is not a hostilities and it is a crossjack. sent4: if the phyllo is not a buttocks the fact that either the ratite is not a flintstone or it is nectar-rich or both is incorrect. sent5: if something is nectar-rich it is a kind of a Mosaic. sent6: if the curb is a flintstone and a Mosaic that it does hew Clemenceau is right. ; $proof$ = | sent3 & sent2 -> int1: the thyroprotein is nectar-rich.; sent5 -> int2: if the thyroprotein is nectar-rich then it is a kind of a Mosaic.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ | DeductionInstance | the thyroprotein is nectar-rich if it is not a hostilities and it is a crossjack. | [
"the thyroprotein is not a hostilities but it is a crossjack.",
"if something is nectar-rich it is a kind of a Mosaic."
] | [
"It is a crossjack if it is not a hostilities.",
"It is a crossjack if it is not hostilities."
] |
the ten-spot does not diverge industrialism but it does diverge nutrient. | sent1: if something is not a neatness then the fact that it diverges industrialism and does diverge nutrient is not true. sent2: if the fact that something does not glaze press and it is not anisogametic is wrong then it is not improbable. sent3: the fact that the ten-spot does not hew photon and is bimodal is wrong if it is not anisogametic. sent4: there exists something such that it is a bullheaded. sent5: something does not reckon if that it does glaze methotrexate and it is not a throbbing does not hold. sent6: if something is not a kind of a neatness the fact that it does not diverge industrialism and diverges nutrient is not true. sent7: the ten-spot is a neatness if the hub is a Orectolobus. sent8: if the fact that that the ten-spot is toll-free but it does not glaze press is not incorrect is not correct then it does not hew ten-spot. sent9: the fact that the ten-spot diverges industrialism and does diverge nutrient is not correct. sent10: there exists something such that it is ultramicroscopic. sent11: something is a Orectolobus if it is a kind of non-defervescent a biotechnology. sent12: that something is not a kind of an ulster and dodges arthropod does not hold if it does not hew Stilwell. sent13: if that something is anisogametic and does not glaze press is false then it is not a neatness. sent14: the hub is not defervescent if something is not a drag. sent15: the fact that the ten-spot diverges industrialism and it diverges nutrient does not hold if it is not a neatness. sent16: that the ten-spot is anisogametic thing that glazes press does not hold. sent17: there is something such that it does not drag. sent18: if something does not hew scepter the fact that it is not a kind of a Belloc and it is electrochemical does not hold. sent19: if something is not improbable then it does not diverge industrialism and does diverge nutrient. sent20: if there exists something such that it is improbable then the fact that that the ten-spot is anisogametic but it does not glaze press is wrong is not wrong. sent21: there is something such that that it is improbable hold. sent22: that the fact that the umbrellawort is manorial and not a glass does not hold is correct. sent23: the fact that something does not glaze press and is not anisogametic is incorrect if it is a neatness. sent24: if there is something such that it is improbable then the fact that the ten-spot is a kind of anisogametic thing that does glaze press does not hold. | (¬{E}{a} & {F}{a}) | sent1: (x): ¬{D}x -> ¬({E}x & {F}x) sent2: (x): ¬(¬{C}x & ¬{B}x) -> ¬{A}x sent3: ¬{B}{a} -> ¬(¬{EM}{a} & {IJ}{a}) sent4: (Ex): {DF}x sent5: (x): ¬({BR}x & ¬{BE}x) -> ¬{FS}x sent6: (x): ¬{D}x -> ¬(¬{E}x & {F}x) sent7: {G}{b} -> {D}{a} sent8: ¬({FU}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) -> ¬{EQ}{a} sent9: ¬({E}{a} & {F}{a}) sent10: (Ex): {BS}x sent11: (x): (¬{H}x & {I}x) -> {G}x sent12: (x): ¬{IF}x -> ¬(¬{JD}x & {EP}x) sent13: (x): ¬({B}x & ¬{C}x) -> ¬{D}x sent14: (x): ¬{J}x -> ¬{H}{b} sent15: ¬{D}{a} -> ¬({E}{a} & {F}{a}) sent16: ¬({B}{a} & {C}{a}) sent17: (Ex): ¬{J}x sent18: (x): ¬{HC}x -> ¬(¬{DT}x & {HU}x) sent19: (x): ¬{A}x -> (¬{E}x & {F}x) sent20: (x): {A}x -> ¬({B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) sent21: (Ex): {A}x sent22: ¬({JH}{i} & ¬{BK}{i}) sent23: (x): {D}x -> ¬(¬{C}x & ¬{B}x) sent24: (x): {A}x -> ¬({B}{a} & {C}{a}) | [
"sent21 & sent20 -> int1: the fact that the ten-spot is not non-anisogametic and does not glaze press is wrong.; sent13 -> int2: if the fact that the ten-spot is anisogametic thing that does not glaze press is incorrect then it is not a neatness.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the ten-spot is not a kind of a neatness.; sent6 -> int4: if the ten-spot is not a kind of a neatness then the fact that it does not diverge industrialism and does diverge nutrient is not correct.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | [
"sent21 & sent20 -> int1: ¬({B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}); sent13 -> int2: ¬({B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) -> ¬{D}{a}; int1 & int2 -> int3: ¬{D}{a}; sent6 -> int4: ¬{D}{a} -> ¬(¬{E}{a} & {F}{a}); int3 & int4 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | 3 | 3 | 20 | 0 | 20 | that the ten-spot does not diverge industrialism but it diverges nutrient is right. | (¬{E}{a} & {F}{a}) | 7 | [
"sent19 -> int5: the ten-spot does not diverge industrialism and diverges nutrient if that it is not improbable hold.; sent2 -> int6: if that the ten-spot does not glaze press and it is not anisogametic does not hold it is not improbable.; sent23 -> int7: if the ten-spot is a neatness that it does not glaze press and is not anisogametic is not right.; sent11 -> int8: if the hub is non-defervescent but it is a biotechnology it is a Orectolobus.; sent17 & sent14 -> int9: the hub is not defervescent.;"
] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the ten-spot does not diverge industrialism but it does diverge nutrient. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not a neatness then the fact that it diverges industrialism and does diverge nutrient is not true. sent2: if the fact that something does not glaze press and it is not anisogametic is wrong then it is not improbable. sent3: the fact that the ten-spot does not hew photon and is bimodal is wrong if it is not anisogametic. sent4: there exists something such that it is a bullheaded. sent5: something does not reckon if that it does glaze methotrexate and it is not a throbbing does not hold. sent6: if something is not a kind of a neatness the fact that it does not diverge industrialism and diverges nutrient is not true. sent7: the ten-spot is a neatness if the hub is a Orectolobus. sent8: if the fact that that the ten-spot is toll-free but it does not glaze press is not incorrect is not correct then it does not hew ten-spot. sent9: the fact that the ten-spot diverges industrialism and does diverge nutrient is not correct. sent10: there exists something such that it is ultramicroscopic. sent11: something is a Orectolobus if it is a kind of non-defervescent a biotechnology. sent12: that something is not a kind of an ulster and dodges arthropod does not hold if it does not hew Stilwell. sent13: if that something is anisogametic and does not glaze press is false then it is not a neatness. sent14: the hub is not defervescent if something is not a drag. sent15: the fact that the ten-spot diverges industrialism and it diverges nutrient does not hold if it is not a neatness. sent16: that the ten-spot is anisogametic thing that glazes press does not hold. sent17: there is something such that it does not drag. sent18: if something does not hew scepter the fact that it is not a kind of a Belloc and it is electrochemical does not hold. sent19: if something is not improbable then it does not diverge industrialism and does diverge nutrient. sent20: if there exists something such that it is improbable then the fact that that the ten-spot is anisogametic but it does not glaze press is wrong is not wrong. sent21: there is something such that that it is improbable hold. sent22: that the fact that the umbrellawort is manorial and not a glass does not hold is correct. sent23: the fact that something does not glaze press and is not anisogametic is incorrect if it is a neatness. sent24: if there is something such that it is improbable then the fact that the ten-spot is a kind of anisogametic thing that does glaze press does not hold. ; $proof$ = | sent21 & sent20 -> int1: the fact that the ten-spot is not non-anisogametic and does not glaze press is wrong.; sent13 -> int2: if the fact that the ten-spot is anisogametic thing that does not glaze press is incorrect then it is not a neatness.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the ten-spot is not a kind of a neatness.; sent6 -> int4: if the ten-spot is not a kind of a neatness then the fact that it does not diverge industrialism and does diverge nutrient is not correct.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ | DeductionInstance | there is something such that that it is improbable hold. | [
"if there exists something such that it is improbable then the fact that that the ten-spot is anisogametic but it does not glaze press is wrong is not wrong.",
"if that something is anisogametic and does not glaze press is false then it is not a neatness.",
"if something is not a kind of a neatness the fact that it does not diverge industrialism and diverges nutrient is not true."
] | [
"It is an unlikely hold.",
"It is an impossible hold.",
"It is an implausible hold."
] |
the portwatcher is not a due. | sent1: if the ramekin is not high-energy the skull does glaze souring but it does not one-step. sent2: the skull does not one-step. sent3: if there is something such that it is instructive the portwatcher is not a kind of a due. sent4: that the ramekin is both not uninstructive and a Ruritanian does not hold. sent5: something is both not a Somalian and not many if it is a Phylloporus. sent6: that the ramekin is a kind of non-instructive a Ruritanian does not hold if the skull is not a one-step. sent7: there is something such that the fact that it is not a one-step and it is instructive is incorrect. sent8: there exists something such that that it is a due and it one-steps is not correct. sent9: the fact that if there is something such that it is not a kind of a due then the ramekin is not instructive is not wrong. sent10: something is a kind of uninstructive a one-step. sent11: if there exists something such that that it is not instructive and it is Ruritanian is not right the portwatcher is undue. sent12: there is something such that the fact that it does not one-step and it is a Ruritanian is incorrect. | ¬{B}{c} | sent1: ¬{D}{b} -> ({C}{a} & ¬{A}{a}) sent2: ¬{A}{a} sent3: (x): {AA}x -> ¬{B}{c} sent4: ¬({AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) sent5: (x): {G}x -> (¬{F}x & ¬{E}x) sent6: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬(¬{AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) sent7: (Ex): ¬(¬{A}x & {AA}x) sent8: (Ex): ¬({B}x & {A}x) sent9: (x): ¬{B}x -> ¬{AA}{b} sent10: (Ex): (¬{AA}x & {A}x) sent11: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) -> ¬{B}{c} sent12: (Ex): ¬(¬{A}x & {AB}x) | [
"sent6 & sent2 -> int1: that the ramekin is not instructive but it is a Ruritanian is wrong.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that that it is uninstructive a Ruritanian does not hold.; int2 & sent11 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | [
"sent6 & sent2 -> int1: ¬(¬{AA}{b} & {AB}{b}); int1 -> int2: (Ex): ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x); int2 & sent11 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | 3 | 3 | 9 | 0 | 9 | the portwatcher is not undue. | {B}{c} | 7 | [
"sent5 -> int3: if the produce is a Phylloporus then it is not Somalian and it is not many.;"
] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the portwatcher is not a due. ; $context$ = sent1: if the ramekin is not high-energy the skull does glaze souring but it does not one-step. sent2: the skull does not one-step. sent3: if there is something such that it is instructive the portwatcher is not a kind of a due. sent4: that the ramekin is both not uninstructive and a Ruritanian does not hold. sent5: something is both not a Somalian and not many if it is a Phylloporus. sent6: that the ramekin is a kind of non-instructive a Ruritanian does not hold if the skull is not a one-step. sent7: there is something such that the fact that it is not a one-step and it is instructive is incorrect. sent8: there exists something such that that it is a due and it one-steps is not correct. sent9: the fact that if there is something such that it is not a kind of a due then the ramekin is not instructive is not wrong. sent10: something is a kind of uninstructive a one-step. sent11: if there exists something such that that it is not instructive and it is Ruritanian is not right the portwatcher is undue. sent12: there is something such that the fact that it does not one-step and it is a Ruritanian is incorrect. ; $proof$ = | sent6 & sent2 -> int1: that the ramekin is not instructive but it is a Ruritanian is wrong.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that that it is uninstructive a Ruritanian does not hold.; int2 & sent11 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ | DeductionInstance | that the ramekin is a kind of non-instructive a Ruritanian does not hold if the skull is not a one-step. | [
"the skull does not one-step.",
"if there exists something such that that it is not instructive and it is Ruritanian is not right the portwatcher is undue."
] | [
"A Ruritanian does not hold the ramekin if the skull is not a one-step.",
"A Ruritanian doesn't hold the ramekin if the skull is not a one-step."
] |
the columbo is not a Bartlett. | sent1: the columbo is a striker. sent2: if something is a kind of a national but it is not a patisserie then it is not a Bartlett. sent3: the dashiki is a kind of a Bartlett. sent4: the crupper is unstatesmanlike if that it is a Bartlett hold. sent5: the columbo is a national. sent6: something does not diverge cardhouse but it is imperialistic if it is not a best. sent7: if the deerhound is paradigmatic but not a lead then the columbo does not consummate. sent8: the spot is a patisserie and it does glaze neem. sent9: if something is not a patisserie then the fact that it is not a kind of a Bartlett and it is not a kind of a national is not right. sent10: the columbo is a patisserie and a national. sent11: something is national if it is a Bartlett. sent12: something is a kind of a national if that it is a patisserie is not false. sent13: the deerhound is paradigmatic thing that does not lead. sent14: if something does not diverge cardhouse but it is imperialistic then it is not a patisserie. sent15: something is out a national if the fact that it does consummate is wrong. sent16: the particle is a Bartlett. sent17: a patisserie is a Bartlett. | ¬{C}{a} | sent1: {GU}{a} sent2: (x): ({B}x & ¬{A}x) -> ¬{C}x sent3: {C}{jb} sent4: {C}{gh} -> {DE}{gh} sent5: {B}{a} sent6: (x): ¬{J}x -> (¬{D}x & {E}x) sent7: ({H}{b} & ¬{I}{b}) -> ¬{G}{a} sent8: ({A}{ho} & {AM}{ho}) sent9: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬(¬{C}x & ¬{B}x) sent10: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) sent11: (x): {C}x -> {B}x sent12: (x): {A}x -> {B}x sent13: ({H}{b} & ¬{I}{b}) sent14: (x): (¬{D}x & {E}x) -> ¬{A}x sent15: (x): ¬{G}x -> ({F}x & {B}x) sent16: {C}{ea} sent17: (x): {A}x -> {C}x | [
"sent10 -> int1: the columbo is a patisserie.; sent17 -> int2: if the columbo is a patisserie then it is a Bartlett.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | [
"sent10 -> int1: {A}{a}; sent17 -> int2: {A}{a} -> {C}{a}; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | 2 | 2 | 15 | 0 | 15 | that the columbo is not a kind of a Bartlett is true. | ¬{C}{a} | 5 | [
"sent2 -> int3: the columbo is not a Bartlett if it is a national and it is not a patisserie.; sent15 -> int4: the columbo does out and it is a kind of a national if it does not consummate.; sent7 & sent13 -> int5: the columbo does not consummate.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the columbo is out and national.; int6 -> int7: the columbo is not non-national.; sent14 -> int8: the columbo is not a patisserie if it does not diverge cardhouse and is imperialistic.; sent6 -> int9: if the columbo is non-best then it does not diverge cardhouse and it is imperialistic.;"
] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the columbo is not a Bartlett. ; $context$ = sent1: the columbo is a striker. sent2: if something is a kind of a national but it is not a patisserie then it is not a Bartlett. sent3: the dashiki is a kind of a Bartlett. sent4: the crupper is unstatesmanlike if that it is a Bartlett hold. sent5: the columbo is a national. sent6: something does not diverge cardhouse but it is imperialistic if it is not a best. sent7: if the deerhound is paradigmatic but not a lead then the columbo does not consummate. sent8: the spot is a patisserie and it does glaze neem. sent9: if something is not a patisserie then the fact that it is not a kind of a Bartlett and it is not a kind of a national is not right. sent10: the columbo is a patisserie and a national. sent11: something is national if it is a Bartlett. sent12: something is a kind of a national if that it is a patisserie is not false. sent13: the deerhound is paradigmatic thing that does not lead. sent14: if something does not diverge cardhouse but it is imperialistic then it is not a patisserie. sent15: something is out a national if the fact that it does consummate is wrong. sent16: the particle is a Bartlett. sent17: a patisserie is a Bartlett. ; $proof$ = | sent10 -> int1: the columbo is a patisserie.; sent17 -> int2: if the columbo is a patisserie then it is a Bartlett.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ | DeductionInstance | the columbo is a patisserie and a national. | [
"a patisserie is a Bartlett."
] | [
"the columbo is a patisserie and a national."
] |
the aviator is not paschal. | sent1: if the aviator is paschal then it is not accurate and it is a promptness. sent2: if the bluegill is a core then it is paschal. sent3: if the fact that something is a promptness and it does core is incorrect it is not a promptness. sent4: the aviator does diverge albinism. sent5: that the aviator is not a faithful is right. sent6: if something diverges albinism then the fact that it is not a kind of a defroster and it is not a hawk is not true. | ¬{A}{a} | sent1: {A}{a} -> (¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) sent2: {C}{b} -> {A}{b} sent3: (x): ¬({AB}x & {C}x) -> ¬{AB}x sent4: {F}{a} sent5: ¬{B}{a} sent6: (x): {F}x -> ¬(¬{D}x & ¬{E}x) | [
"void -> assump1: Let's assume that the aviator is paschal.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the aviator is not accurate but a promptness.; int1 -> int2: the aviator is a kind of a promptness.; sent3 -> int3: that the aviator is not a promptness is not incorrect if that it is a promptness and is a core is incorrect.;"
] | UNKNOWN | [
"void -> assump1: {A}{a}; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: (¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}); int1 -> int2: {AB}{a}; sent3 -> int3: ¬({AB}{a} & {C}{a}) -> ¬{AB}{a};"
] | UNKNOWN | 4 | null | 3 | 0 | 3 | the aviator is paschal. | {A}{a} | 5 | [] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the aviator is not paschal. ; $context$ = sent1: if the aviator is paschal then it is not accurate and it is a promptness. sent2: if the bluegill is a core then it is paschal. sent3: if the fact that something is a promptness and it does core is incorrect it is not a promptness. sent4: the aviator does diverge albinism. sent5: that the aviator is not a faithful is right. sent6: if something diverges albinism then the fact that it is not a kind of a defroster and it is not a hawk is not true. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ | DeductionInstance | if the aviator is paschal then it is not accurate and it is a promptness. | [
"if the fact that something is a promptness and it does core is incorrect it is not a promptness."
] | [
"if the aviator is paschal then it is not accurate and it is a promptness."
] |
that there is something such that if it is not inconvertible that it does not diverge Lactarius and is septal is wrong is incorrect. | sent1: if something does chafe then the fact that it is not virile but septal is not right. sent2: if the peasecod is convertible then that it does diverge Lactarius and is septal is not correct. sent3: if the peasecod is a convertible then the fact that it does not diverge Lactarius and it is septal is false. sent4: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a convertible then that it diverges Lactarius and it is septal does not hold. sent5: there exists something such that if it is convertible then it does not diverge Lactarius and is septal. sent6: if the peasecod does diverge tax-increase then that it is not a segue and glazes eventration is not right. sent7: the peasecod does not diverge Lactarius but it is septal if it is not inconvertible. | ¬((Ex): {A}x -> ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x)) | sent1: (x): {HQ}x -> ¬(¬{HP}x & {AB}x) sent2: {A}{aa} -> ¬({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) sent3: {A}{aa} -> ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) sent4: (Ex): {A}x -> ¬({AA}x & {AB}x) sent5: (Ex): {A}x -> (¬{AA}x & {AB}x) sent6: {BU}{aa} -> ¬(¬{HJ}{aa} & {CI}{aa}) sent7: {A}{aa} -> (¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) | [
"sent3 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | [
"sent3 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | 1 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 6 | that the peasecod is not virile but it is septal is false if it does chafe. | {HQ}{aa} -> ¬(¬{HP}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) | 1 | [
"sent1 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | PROVED | $hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if it is not inconvertible that it does not diverge Lactarius and is septal is wrong is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if something does chafe then the fact that it is not virile but septal is not right. sent2: if the peasecod is convertible then that it does diverge Lactarius and is septal is not correct. sent3: if the peasecod is a convertible then the fact that it does not diverge Lactarius and it is septal is false. sent4: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a convertible then that it diverges Lactarius and it is septal does not hold. sent5: there exists something such that if it is convertible then it does not diverge Lactarius and is septal. sent6: if the peasecod does diverge tax-increase then that it is not a segue and glazes eventration is not right. sent7: the peasecod does not diverge Lactarius but it is septal if it is not inconvertible. ; $proof$ = | sent3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ | DeductionInstance | if the peasecod is a convertible then the fact that it does not diverge Lactarius and it is septal is false. | [] | [
"if the peasecod is a convertible then the fact that it does not diverge Lactarius and it is septal is false."
] |
that the horst is not a Blighty and not a Po is right. | sent1: something is a Po if the fact that it is a kind of a Spitsbergen is not wrong. sent2: the horst is not a Blighty and it is not a Po if the pindolol is a kind of a Po. sent3: the pindolol is a Spitsbergen if something does not Romanize and is a eudiometer. sent4: something does not Romanize and is a kind of a eudiometer. | (¬{C}{b} & ¬{B}{b}) | sent1: (x): {A}x -> {B}x sent2: {B}{a} -> (¬{C}{b} & ¬{B}{b}) sent3: (x): (¬{AA}x & {AB}x) -> {A}{a} sent4: (Ex): (¬{AA}x & {AB}x) | [
"sent4 & sent3 -> int1: the pindolol is a Spitsbergen.; sent1 -> int2: the fact that the pindolol is the Po if the pindolol is a Spitsbergen is not false.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the pindolol is a Po.; int3 & sent2 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | [
"sent4 & sent3 -> int1: {A}{a}; sent1 -> int2: {A}{a} -> {B}{a}; int1 & int2 -> int3: {B}{a}; int3 & sent2 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | [] | null | null | $hypothesis$ = that the horst is not a Blighty and not a Po is right. ; $context$ = sent1: something is a Po if the fact that it is a kind of a Spitsbergen is not wrong. sent2: the horst is not a Blighty and it is not a Po if the pindolol is a kind of a Po. sent3: the pindolol is a Spitsbergen if something does not Romanize and is a eudiometer. sent4: something does not Romanize and is a kind of a eudiometer. ; $proof$ = | sent4 & sent3 -> int1: the pindolol is a Spitsbergen.; sent1 -> int2: the fact that the pindolol is the Po if the pindolol is a Spitsbergen is not false.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the pindolol is a Po.; int3 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ | DeductionInstance | something does not Romanize and is a kind of a eudiometer. | [
"the pindolol is a Spitsbergen if something does not Romanize and is a eudiometer.",
"something is a Po if the fact that it is a kind of a Spitsbergen is not wrong.",
"the horst is not a Blighty and it is not a Po if the pindolol is a kind of a Po."
] | [
"A kind of eudiometer is something that does not Romanize.",
"A kind of eudiometer is something that doesn't Romanize.",
"Something doesn't Romanize and is a kind of eudiometer."
] |
the malope is glorious and it is a kind of a Goliath. | sent1: if that something is not Mercurial and is an intervenor is not correct it is not a kind of an intervenor. sent2: if the citrine is not a gracelessness but a starlet the plage is not a kind of a starlet. sent3: if the plage is not a starlet the fact that the malope is not glorious and not autoecious does not hold. sent4: that the trimmer is not Mercurial and is an intervenor is incorrect if it is a sled. sent5: that the malope is a Goliath but it is not Dionysian is not right. sent6: the malope is a booboisie and it diverges Succoth. sent7: that the malope is not a kind of a Goliath and it is not a kind of a jesting is false. sent8: the trimmer is a kind of a sled if it is a poisoner. sent9: something is not a kind of a jesting if that it does not diverge Renoir and is a jesting is incorrect. sent10: the malope is not a starlet but it is not inglorious. sent11: if the halocarbon is not a jesting the citrine is not a gracelessness but a starlet. sent12: the trimmer is a kind of a poisoner. | ({B}{a} & {C}{a}) | sent1: (x): ¬(¬{H}x & {G}x) -> ¬{G}x sent2: (¬{D}{c} & {A}{c}) -> ¬{A}{b} sent3: ¬{A}{b} -> ¬(¬{B}{a} & ¬{AQ}{a}) sent4: {I}{e} -> ¬(¬{H}{e} & {G}{e}) sent5: ¬({C}{a} & ¬{CJ}{a}) sent6: ({ET}{a} & {JI}{a}) sent7: ¬(¬{C}{a} & ¬{E}{a}) sent8: {J}{e} -> {I}{e} sent9: (x): ¬(¬{F}x & {E}x) -> ¬{E}x sent10: (¬{A}{a} & {B}{a}) sent11: ¬{E}{d} -> (¬{D}{c} & {A}{c}) sent12: {J}{e} | [
"sent10 -> int1: the malope is glorious.;"
] | UNKNOWN | [
"sent10 -> int1: {B}{a};"
] | UNKNOWN | 2 | null | 10 | 0 | 10 | the fact that the malope is both not glorious and not autoecious is not correct. | ¬(¬{B}{a} & ¬{AQ}{a}) | 4 | [] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the malope is glorious and it is a kind of a Goliath. ; $context$ = sent1: if that something is not Mercurial and is an intervenor is not correct it is not a kind of an intervenor. sent2: if the citrine is not a gracelessness but a starlet the plage is not a kind of a starlet. sent3: if the plage is not a starlet the fact that the malope is not glorious and not autoecious does not hold. sent4: that the trimmer is not Mercurial and is an intervenor is incorrect if it is a sled. sent5: that the malope is a Goliath but it is not Dionysian is not right. sent6: the malope is a booboisie and it diverges Succoth. sent7: that the malope is not a kind of a Goliath and it is not a kind of a jesting is false. sent8: the trimmer is a kind of a sled if it is a poisoner. sent9: something is not a kind of a jesting if that it does not diverge Renoir and is a jesting is incorrect. sent10: the malope is not a starlet but it is not inglorious. sent11: if the halocarbon is not a jesting the citrine is not a gracelessness but a starlet. sent12: the trimmer is a kind of a poisoner. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ | DeductionInstance | the malope is not a starlet but it is not inglorious. | [] | [
"the malope is not a starlet but it is not inglorious."
] |
that there is something such that if it is not adynamic then the fact that it is not a wire and is not expendable does not hold is not right. | sent1: there exists something such that if it is adynamic then the fact that it is not a wire and not expendable is not correct. sent2: there is something such that if it is not adynamic then it is not a wire and is unexpendable. sent3: the fact that the concrete is not a rya and it is not a kind of an amble does not hold if the fact that it is not a feasting is right. sent4: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not numeric is not incorrect that it is not gothic and is not postural does not hold. sent5: if the freeman does not wire the fact that it does not diverge booklet and does not glaze hatefulness does not hold. sent6: there is something such that if it is not a Karloff then that it does not dodge pepper-and-salt and it is not a kind of an absence does not hold. sent7: the fact that the concrete is both a wire and not expendable is false if it is not adynamic. sent8: if the concrete is not adynamic that it is not a wire and it is not expendable is incorrect. sent9: the fact that the concrete is not a wire and it is not expendable is true if it is not adynamic. sent10: that the bridge is a kind of non-adynamic thing that is not nonassociative does not hold if it does not diverge booklet. sent11: if that something is not a Titian hold then that it is not transdermal and does not diverge witching does not hold. sent12: that the concrete is both not a wire and expendable does not hold if it is not adynamic. sent13: there exists something such that if it is not a wasp then the fact that it does not glaze concrete and is not a Karloff is false. sent14: there is something such that if it is not adynamic then the fact that it is both not a wire and expendable is incorrect. sent15: if the concrete is adynamic the fact that it does not wire and is not expendable does not hold. sent16: if something is not a cent the fact that it is both not ambitious and not a frill is not true. sent17: there exists something such that if it is not adynamic the fact that it is both a wire and not expendable does not hold. | ¬((Ex): ¬{A}x -> ¬(¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x)) | sent1: (Ex): {A}x -> ¬(¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) sent2: (Ex): ¬{A}x -> (¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) sent3: ¬{BE}{aa} -> ¬(¬{ID}{aa} & ¬{FB}{aa}) sent4: (Ex): ¬{FA}x -> ¬(¬{AH}x & ¬{GF}x) sent5: ¬{AA}{ec} -> ¬(¬{EC}{ec} & ¬{CM}{ec}) sent6: (Ex): ¬{AG}x -> ¬(¬{CA}x & ¬{DH}x) sent7: ¬{A}{aa} -> ¬({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) sent8: ¬{A}{aa} -> ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) sent9: ¬{A}{aa} -> (¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) sent10: ¬{EC}{fm} -> ¬(¬{A}{fm} & ¬{FO}{fm}) sent11: (x): ¬{IT}x -> ¬(¬{BH}x & ¬{K}x) sent12: ¬{A}{aa} -> ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) sent13: (Ex): ¬{AL}x -> ¬(¬{FM}x & ¬{AG}x) sent14: (Ex): ¬{A}x -> ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) sent15: {A}{aa} -> ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) sent16: (x): ¬{P}x -> ¬(¬{AJ}x & ¬{BO}x) sent17: (Ex): ¬{A}x -> ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) | [
"sent8 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | [
"sent8 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | 1 | 1 | 16 | 0 | 16 | there exists something such that if it is not a Titian then the fact that it is non-transdermal thing that does not diverge witching is not true. | (Ex): ¬{IT}x -> ¬(¬{BH}x & ¬{K}x) | 2 | [
"sent11 -> int1: that the tridymite is not transdermal and it does not diverge witching does not hold if it is not a Titian.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | PROVED | $hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if it is not adynamic then the fact that it is not a wire and is not expendable does not hold is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it is adynamic then the fact that it is not a wire and not expendable is not correct. sent2: there is something such that if it is not adynamic then it is not a wire and is unexpendable. sent3: the fact that the concrete is not a rya and it is not a kind of an amble does not hold if the fact that it is not a feasting is right. sent4: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not numeric is not incorrect that it is not gothic and is not postural does not hold. sent5: if the freeman does not wire the fact that it does not diverge booklet and does not glaze hatefulness does not hold. sent6: there is something such that if it is not a Karloff then that it does not dodge pepper-and-salt and it is not a kind of an absence does not hold. sent7: the fact that the concrete is both a wire and not expendable is false if it is not adynamic. sent8: if the concrete is not adynamic that it is not a wire and it is not expendable is incorrect. sent9: the fact that the concrete is not a wire and it is not expendable is true if it is not adynamic. sent10: that the bridge is a kind of non-adynamic thing that is not nonassociative does not hold if it does not diverge booklet. sent11: if that something is not a Titian hold then that it is not transdermal and does not diverge witching does not hold. sent12: that the concrete is both not a wire and expendable does not hold if it is not adynamic. sent13: there exists something such that if it is not a wasp then the fact that it does not glaze concrete and is not a Karloff is false. sent14: there is something such that if it is not adynamic then the fact that it is both not a wire and expendable is incorrect. sent15: if the concrete is adynamic the fact that it does not wire and is not expendable does not hold. sent16: if something is not a cent the fact that it is both not ambitious and not a frill is not true. sent17: there exists something such that if it is not adynamic the fact that it is both a wire and not expendable does not hold. ; $proof$ = | sent8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ | DeductionInstance | if the concrete is not adynamic that it is not a wire and it is not expendable is incorrect. | [] | [
"if the concrete is not adynamic that it is not a wire and it is not expendable is incorrect."
] |
the hydrant is an admonition. | sent1: if the naphthol does diverge Marxist then that that the assessee is not non-real-time and is not a nonce is not correct hold. sent2: something that is a kind of a nonce does not hew aileron and hews radiogram. sent3: if something that is not a chancery is real-time then it is not an admonition. sent4: the hydrant is not a chancery but real-time if there is something such that it is a kind of a nonce. sent5: there is something such that it is a kind of a nonce. | {D}{a} | sent1: {E}{e} -> ¬({C}{d} & ¬{A}{d}) sent2: (x): {A}x -> (¬{IH}x & {FN}x) sent3: (x): (¬{B}x & {C}x) -> ¬{D}x sent4: (x): {A}x -> (¬{B}{a} & {C}{a}) sent5: (Ex): {A}x | [
"sent5 & sent4 -> int1: the hydrant is not a chancery but it is real-time.; sent3 -> int2: the hydrant is not an admonition if it is not a kind of a chancery and is real-time.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | [
"sent5 & sent4 -> int1: (¬{B}{a} & {C}{a}); sent3 -> int2: (¬{B}{a} & {C}{a}) -> ¬{D}{a}; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | the virago does not hew aileron but it does hew radiogram. | (¬{IH}{fh} & {FN}{fh}) | 5 | [
"sent2 -> int3: if the fact that the virago is a kind of a nonce is right it does not hew aileron and does hew radiogram.;"
] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the hydrant is an admonition. ; $context$ = sent1: if the naphthol does diverge Marxist then that that the assessee is not non-real-time and is not a nonce is not correct hold. sent2: something that is a kind of a nonce does not hew aileron and hews radiogram. sent3: if something that is not a chancery is real-time then it is not an admonition. sent4: the hydrant is not a chancery but real-time if there is something such that it is a kind of a nonce. sent5: there is something such that it is a kind of a nonce. ; $proof$ = | sent5 & sent4 -> int1: the hydrant is not a chancery but it is real-time.; sent3 -> int2: the hydrant is not an admonition if it is not a kind of a chancery and is real-time.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ | DeductionInstance | there is something such that it is a kind of a nonce. | [
"the hydrant is not a chancery but real-time if there is something such that it is a kind of a nonce.",
"if something that is not a chancery is real-time then it is not an admonition."
] | [
"It is a kind of nonce.",
"A kind of nonce is what it is."
] |
something does not hew beastliness and it does not gesticulate. | sent1: the hipflask does not gesticulate. sent2: the fact that the housedog does not diverge picul is not incorrect. sent3: the fact that something does not immigrate and is not a Eisenstaedt is false if it is not inoperable. sent4: there is something such that that it does hew beastliness and it does not gesticulate is not incorrect. sent5: the housedog does not encourage and does not hew beastliness. sent6: the fact that something does not encourage and it does not diverge picul is true. sent7: the housedog does diverge picul if the gentleman diverge picul but it is not a microgliacyte. sent8: the gentleman does diverge picul but it is not a kind of a microgliacyte if that the leeway does not encourage is not false. sent9: if the housedog does diverge picul then the fact that the sardonyx gesticulates and does not hew beastliness is wrong. sent10: the swag does not gesticulate. sent11: there exists something such that it does not encourage. sent12: the housedog is not alterable. sent13: the housedog is not an agglomeration and does not bear. sent14: the housedog is not a kind of a grating and is not a welcher. sent15: the housedog is not a kind of a Sagittarius and does not diverge picul. sent16: there exists something such that that it is both a Micah and not a arachnoid is false. sent17: something does not gesticulate if the fact that it does gesticulate and it does not hew beastliness is not true. sent18: the housedog does not diverge backed and it is not a 120. sent19: there exists something such that that it does not evert hold. sent20: the housedog does not diverge picul and it does not gesticulate. sent21: the shopkeeper does not hew beastliness. sent22: if something is not a Micah it is not inoperable. | (Ex): (¬{C}x & ¬{B}x) | sent1: ¬{B}{cj} sent2: ¬{A}{a} sent3: (x): ¬{H}x -> ¬(¬{F}x & ¬{G}x) sent4: (Ex): ({C}x & ¬{B}x) sent5: (¬{D}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) sent6: (Ex): (¬{D}x & ¬{A}x) sent7: ({A}{b} & ¬{E}{b}) -> {A}{a} sent8: ¬{D}{c} -> ({A}{b} & ¬{E}{b}) sent9: {A}{a} -> ¬({B}{co} & ¬{C}{co}) sent10: ¬{B}{ho} sent11: (Ex): ¬{D}x sent12: ¬{AL}{a} sent13: (¬{BS}{a} & ¬{GB}{a}) sent14: (¬{GP}{a} & ¬{FA}{a}) sent15: (¬{GL}{a} & ¬{A}{a}) sent16: (Ex): ¬({I}x & ¬{K}x) sent17: (x): ¬({B}x & ¬{C}x) -> ¬{B}x sent18: (¬{U}{a} & ¬{CC}{a}) sent19: (Ex): ¬{EL}x sent20: (¬{A}{a} & ¬{B}{a}) sent21: ¬{C}{dr} sent22: (x): ¬{I}x -> ¬{H}x | [
"sent20 -> int1: the housedog does not gesticulate.; sent5 -> int2: the housedog does not hew beastliness.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the housedog does not hew beastliness and does not gesticulate.; int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | [
"sent20 -> int1: ¬{B}{a}; sent5 -> int2: ¬{C}{a}; int1 & int2 -> int3: (¬{C}{a} & ¬{B}{a}); int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | 3 | 3 | 20 | 0 | 20 | the sardonyx does not gesticulate. | ¬{B}{co} | 9 | [
"sent17 -> int4: if that the sardonyx does gesticulate but it does not hew beastliness does not hold it does not gesticulate.; sent3 -> int5: the fact that the Newtonian does not immigrate and is not a kind of a Eisenstaedt is not true if it is not inoperable.; sent22 -> int6: the Newtonian is not inoperable if it is not a Micah.;"
] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = something does not hew beastliness and it does not gesticulate. ; $context$ = sent1: the hipflask does not gesticulate. sent2: the fact that the housedog does not diverge picul is not incorrect. sent3: the fact that something does not immigrate and is not a Eisenstaedt is false if it is not inoperable. sent4: there is something such that that it does hew beastliness and it does not gesticulate is not incorrect. sent5: the housedog does not encourage and does not hew beastliness. sent6: the fact that something does not encourage and it does not diverge picul is true. sent7: the housedog does diverge picul if the gentleman diverge picul but it is not a microgliacyte. sent8: the gentleman does diverge picul but it is not a kind of a microgliacyte if that the leeway does not encourage is not false. sent9: if the housedog does diverge picul then the fact that the sardonyx gesticulates and does not hew beastliness is wrong. sent10: the swag does not gesticulate. sent11: there exists something such that it does not encourage. sent12: the housedog is not alterable. sent13: the housedog is not an agglomeration and does not bear. sent14: the housedog is not a kind of a grating and is not a welcher. sent15: the housedog is not a kind of a Sagittarius and does not diverge picul. sent16: there exists something such that that it is both a Micah and not a arachnoid is false. sent17: something does not gesticulate if the fact that it does gesticulate and it does not hew beastliness is not true. sent18: the housedog does not diverge backed and it is not a 120. sent19: there exists something such that that it does not evert hold. sent20: the housedog does not diverge picul and it does not gesticulate. sent21: the shopkeeper does not hew beastliness. sent22: if something is not a Micah it is not inoperable. ; $proof$ = | sent20 -> int1: the housedog does not gesticulate.; sent5 -> int2: the housedog does not hew beastliness.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the housedog does not hew beastliness and does not gesticulate.; int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ | DeductionInstance | the housedog does not diverge picul and it does not gesticulate. | [
"the housedog does not encourage and does not hew beastliness."
] | [
"the housedog does not diverge picul and it does not gesticulate."
] |
the orientalist is not ratlike. | sent1: the fact that the orientalist is a galoot and it is a corporatist is not correct. sent2: if something is corporatist it is a wits. sent3: if the coronilla is not a collection the fact that the Iberian is a kind of a deerstalker and it does hew lottery is not false. sent4: if there is something such that it is a ninepins that the orientalist is neckless but it is not a ninepins does not hold. sent5: that something is a kind of a wits and it is a ninepins is incorrect if it does not intercommunicate. sent6: if the tract is a kind of a Alexandrian the acid is a kind of a ninepins. sent7: everything does not intercommunicate. sent8: the orientalist is not a ninepins. sent9: if the orientalist is not a kind of a ninepins then that it is a galoot and is corporatist is not true. sent10: the orientalist is non-ratlike if it is a kind of a wits and it is a Alexandrian. sent11: that the orientalist is a galoot that is not corporatist does not hold if it is not a ninepins. sent12: if the orientalist is not non-corporatist then it is a wits. sent13: the orientalist is not binary. sent14: if there exists something such that that it does not screen and does not intercommunicate does not hold then the forecastle is not ratlike. sent15: the orientalist is both ratlike and Alexandrian if something is not a wits. sent16: if something that is a cragged is not meager then the coronilla is not a collection. sent17: that something is not a kind of a Alexandrian but it is a wits is not true if it is not ratlike. sent18: that something does not screen and does not intercommunicate does not hold if it hews lottery. sent19: the speck is a galoot. sent20: the minister is a kind of a cragged but it is not meager. sent21: if the fact that the fact that something is a galoot and is not a corporatist hold does not hold then it is a kind of a wits. | ¬{C}{aa} | sent1: ¬({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) sent2: (x): {AB}x -> {B}x sent3: ¬{I}{e} -> ({H}{d} & {G}{d}) sent4: (x): {D}x -> ¬({EN}{aa} & ¬{D}{aa}) sent5: (x): ¬{E}x -> ¬({B}x & {D}x) sent6: {A}{b} -> {D}{a} sent7: (x): ¬{E}x sent8: ¬{D}{aa} sent9: ¬{D}{aa} -> ¬({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) sent10: ({B}{aa} & {A}{aa}) -> ¬{C}{aa} sent11: ¬{D}{aa} -> ¬({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) sent12: {AB}{aa} -> {B}{aa} sent13: ¬{BI}{aa} sent14: (x): ¬(¬{F}x & ¬{E}x) -> ¬{C}{c} sent15: (x): ¬{B}x -> ({C}{aa} & {A}{aa}) sent16: (x): ({J}x & ¬{K}x) -> ¬{I}{e} sent17: (x): ¬{C}x -> ¬(¬{A}x & {B}x) sent18: (x): {G}x -> ¬(¬{F}x & ¬{E}x) sent19: {AA}{hf} sent20: ({J}{f} & ¬{K}{f}) sent21: (x): ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> {B}x | [
"sent21 -> int1: the orientalist is a wits if that it is a galoot and it is not corporatist is not true.; sent11 & sent8 -> int2: the fact that the orientalist is both a galoot and not corporatist is incorrect.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the orientalist is a wits.;"
] | UNKNOWN | [
"sent21 -> int1: ¬({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa}; sent11 & sent8 -> int2: ¬({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}); int1 & int2 -> int3: {B}{aa};"
] | UNKNOWN | 4 | null | 17 | 0 | 17 | the fact that the orientalist is neckless but it is not a ninepins is not true. | ¬({EN}{aa} & ¬{D}{aa}) | 13 | [
"sent17 -> int4: if the forecastle is not ratlike then the fact that it is not a kind of a Alexandrian and it is a wits is not right.; sent18 -> int5: if the Iberian does hew lottery that it does not screen and it does not intercommunicate is not right.; sent20 -> int6: something is a kind of a cragged that is not meager.; int6 & sent16 -> int7: the coronilla is not a collection.; sent3 & int7 -> int8: the Iberian is a deerstalker and hews lottery.; int8 -> int9: the Iberian does hew lottery.; int5 & int9 -> int10: the fact that the Iberian is not a screen and does not intercommunicate does not hold.; int10 -> int11: there exists something such that that it is not a kind of a screen and it does not intercommunicate is not correct.; int11 & sent14 -> int12: the forecastle is not ratlike.; int4 & int12 -> int13: the fact that the forecastle is both not a Alexandrian and a wits is not right.; int13 -> int14: there exists something such that that it is not a Alexandrian and it is a kind of a wits does not hold.;"
] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the orientalist is not ratlike. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the orientalist is a galoot and it is a corporatist is not correct. sent2: if something is corporatist it is a wits. sent3: if the coronilla is not a collection the fact that the Iberian is a kind of a deerstalker and it does hew lottery is not false. sent4: if there is something such that it is a ninepins that the orientalist is neckless but it is not a ninepins does not hold. sent5: that something is a kind of a wits and it is a ninepins is incorrect if it does not intercommunicate. sent6: if the tract is a kind of a Alexandrian the acid is a kind of a ninepins. sent7: everything does not intercommunicate. sent8: the orientalist is not a ninepins. sent9: if the orientalist is not a kind of a ninepins then that it is a galoot and is corporatist is not true. sent10: the orientalist is non-ratlike if it is a kind of a wits and it is a Alexandrian. sent11: that the orientalist is a galoot that is not corporatist does not hold if it is not a ninepins. sent12: if the orientalist is not non-corporatist then it is a wits. sent13: the orientalist is not binary. sent14: if there exists something such that that it does not screen and does not intercommunicate does not hold then the forecastle is not ratlike. sent15: the orientalist is both ratlike and Alexandrian if something is not a wits. sent16: if something that is a cragged is not meager then the coronilla is not a collection. sent17: that something is not a kind of a Alexandrian but it is a wits is not true if it is not ratlike. sent18: that something does not screen and does not intercommunicate does not hold if it hews lottery. sent19: the speck is a galoot. sent20: the minister is a kind of a cragged but it is not meager. sent21: if the fact that the fact that something is a galoot and is not a corporatist hold does not hold then it is a kind of a wits. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ | DeductionInstance | if the fact that the fact that something is a galoot and is not a corporatist hold does not hold then it is a kind of a wits. | [
"that the orientalist is a galoot that is not corporatist does not hold if it is not a ninepins.",
"the orientalist is not a ninepins."
] | [
"It is a kind of wits if the fact that something is not a corporatist hold does not hold.",
"It is a kind of wits if the fact that something is not a corporatist hold doesn't hold."
] |
the witchgrass is a conformist. | sent1: there exists something such that it is not a ivorybill and it commingles inference. sent2: the fact that something is perceptual hold. sent3: there are non-heavy-duty and perceptual things. sent4: everything is a Mendelism. sent5: if the haemoproteid does commingle inference the minnow is a ivorybill. sent6: the witchgrass is not nonconformist if the minnow is a ivorybill. sent7: something either does not commingle inference or is not a ivorybill or both if it is a Mendelism. | {C}{c} | sent1: (Ex): (¬{B}x & {A}x) sent2: (Ex): {AB}x sent3: (Ex): (¬{AA}x & {AB}x) sent4: (x): {D}x sent5: {A}{a} -> {B}{b} sent6: {B}{b} -> {C}{c} sent7: (x): {D}x -> (¬{A}x v ¬{B}x) | [] | UNKNOWN | [] | UNKNOWN | 3 | null | 4 | 0 | 4 | the witchgrass is not a kind of a conformist. | ¬{C}{c} | 6 | [
"sent4 -> int1: the haemoproteid is a Mendelism.; sent7 -> int2: if the haemoproteid is a Mendelism then it does not commingle inference and/or it is not a ivorybill.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the haemoproteid does not commingle inference and/or is not a ivorybill.; int3 -> int4: either everything does not commingle inference or it is not a ivorybill or both.; int4 -> int5: the witchgrass does not commingle inference and/or it is not a ivorybill.;"
] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the witchgrass is a conformist. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that it is not a ivorybill and it commingles inference. sent2: the fact that something is perceptual hold. sent3: there are non-heavy-duty and perceptual things. sent4: everything is a Mendelism. sent5: if the haemoproteid does commingle inference the minnow is a ivorybill. sent6: the witchgrass is not nonconformist if the minnow is a ivorybill. sent7: something either does not commingle inference or is not a ivorybill or both if it is a Mendelism. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ | DeductionInstance | everything is a Mendelism. | [
"something either does not commingle inference or is not a ivorybill or both if it is a Mendelism."
] | [
"everything is a Mendelism."
] |
there exists something such that if it is a songbook then it is incorporeal. | sent1: something is ungregarious if the fact that it is inactive is not wrong. sent2: there exists something such that if it is a rapier then it does prize cutlassfish. sent3: there exists something such that if it is a paynim it is cataclinal. sent4: the leadplant is a re-echo if it is a kind of a emotionality. sent5: there is something such that if it does rope then it is a kind of a variable. sent6: if something is a codeine then it chips. sent7: if the Airedale is a re-echo then it is a gadgetry. sent8: the fact that there is something such that if it is faecal it is a kind of a laborer is true. sent9: there is something such that if it is superjacent it is a kind of a prerogative. sent10: the fact that the leadplant is incorporeal is correct if it is a kind of a songbook. sent11: there is something such that if it homes then it prefigures typing. sent12: the orthodontist is a boost if it retracts. sent13: if the leadplant is a selsyn it is cryogenic. | (Ex): {A}x -> {C}x | sent1: (x): {GF}x -> {IL}x sent2: (Ex): {IP}x -> {AL}x sent3: (Ex): {ES}x -> {O}x sent4: {FC}{aa} -> {BQ}{aa} sent5: (Ex): {CB}x -> {BU}x sent6: (x): {IG}x -> {FD}x sent7: {BQ}{ac} -> {J}{ac} sent8: (Ex): {HO}x -> {BI}x sent9: (Ex): {AG}x -> {AO}x sent10: {A}{aa} -> {C}{aa} sent11: (Ex): {CS}x -> {IB}x sent12: {JB}{dj} -> {BR}{dj} sent13: {FS}{aa} -> {HS}{aa} | [
"sent10 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | [
"sent10 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | 1 | 1 | 12 | 0 | 12 | there is something such that if it is a kind of a codeine it is a kind of a chip. | (Ex): {IG}x -> {FD}x | 2 | [
"sent6 -> int1: the empress is a chip if the fact that it is a codeine hold.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | PROVED | $hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is a songbook then it is incorporeal. ; $context$ = sent1: something is ungregarious if the fact that it is inactive is not wrong. sent2: there exists something such that if it is a rapier then it does prize cutlassfish. sent3: there exists something such that if it is a paynim it is cataclinal. sent4: the leadplant is a re-echo if it is a kind of a emotionality. sent5: there is something such that if it does rope then it is a kind of a variable. sent6: if something is a codeine then it chips. sent7: if the Airedale is a re-echo then it is a gadgetry. sent8: the fact that there is something such that if it is faecal it is a kind of a laborer is true. sent9: there is something such that if it is superjacent it is a kind of a prerogative. sent10: the fact that the leadplant is incorporeal is correct if it is a kind of a songbook. sent11: there is something such that if it homes then it prefigures typing. sent12: the orthodontist is a boost if it retracts. sent13: if the leadplant is a selsyn it is cryogenic. ; $proof$ = | sent10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ | DeductionInstance | the fact that the leadplant is incorporeal is correct if it is a kind of a songbook. | [] | [
"the fact that the leadplant is incorporeal is correct if it is a kind of a songbook."
] |
the housemother is not a kind of a worst. | sent1: something does not worst if it is not morphophonemics. sent2: the housemother is not stenographic. sent3: the Mull is not a kind of a worst. sent4: the housemother is not non-worst and not non-acrocentric if the liger is not Gandhian. sent5: that the liger achieves or it is not morphophonemics or both does not hold if it is parturient. sent6: if something is not acrocentric but it is Gandhian then that it is not morphophonemics is not wrong. sent7: the housemother is not an umbilical and does whizz. sent8: the blast is not acrocentric. sent9: that the housemother is not an intern hold. sent10: the cabin does not disturb but it is Gandhian. sent11: the cocuswood is not worst. sent12: something is not Gandhian if that it achieves and/or is not morphophonemics is not right. sent13: the housemother is not acrocentric. sent14: the housemother is Gandhian. sent15: something is not a choke if it does not commingle seasoning and does commingle Mull. sent16: the sub-assembly is morphophonemics. | ¬{D}{a} | sent1: (x): ¬{C}x -> ¬{D}x sent2: ¬{IR}{a} sent3: ¬{D}{c} sent4: ¬{B}{b} -> ({D}{a} & {A}{a}) sent5: {F}{b} -> ¬({E}{b} v ¬{C}{b}) sent6: (x): (¬{A}x & {B}x) -> ¬{C}x sent7: (¬{GJ}{a} & {R}{a}) sent8: ¬{A}{dh} sent9: ¬{IU}{a} sent10: (¬{AS}{br} & {B}{br}) sent11: ¬{D}{cl} sent12: (x): ¬({E}x v ¬{C}x) -> ¬{B}x sent13: ¬{A}{a} sent14: {B}{a} sent15: (x): (¬{CL}x & {CA}x) -> ¬{FS}x sent16: {C}{dm} | [
"sent13 & sent14 -> int1: the housemother is not acrocentric and is Gandhian.; sent6 -> int2: if the housemother is not acrocentric but it is Gandhian then it is not morphophonemics.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the housemother is not morphophonemics.; sent1 -> int4: if the housemother is not morphophonemics the fact that it is not a kind of a worst is not false.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | [
"sent13 & sent14 -> int1: (¬{A}{a} & {B}{a}); sent6 -> int2: (¬{A}{a} & {B}{a}) -> ¬{C}{a}; int1 & int2 -> int3: ¬{C}{a}; sent1 -> int4: ¬{C}{a} -> ¬{D}{a}; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | 3 | 3 | 12 | 0 | 12 | the housemother is a worst. | {D}{a} | 7 | [
"sent12 -> int5: if that the liger achieves and/or is not morphophonemics is incorrect then it is not Gandhian.;"
] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the housemother is not a kind of a worst. ; $context$ = sent1: something does not worst if it is not morphophonemics. sent2: the housemother is not stenographic. sent3: the Mull is not a kind of a worst. sent4: the housemother is not non-worst and not non-acrocentric if the liger is not Gandhian. sent5: that the liger achieves or it is not morphophonemics or both does not hold if it is parturient. sent6: if something is not acrocentric but it is Gandhian then that it is not morphophonemics is not wrong. sent7: the housemother is not an umbilical and does whizz. sent8: the blast is not acrocentric. sent9: that the housemother is not an intern hold. sent10: the cabin does not disturb but it is Gandhian. sent11: the cocuswood is not worst. sent12: something is not Gandhian if that it achieves and/or is not morphophonemics is not right. sent13: the housemother is not acrocentric. sent14: the housemother is Gandhian. sent15: something is not a choke if it does not commingle seasoning and does commingle Mull. sent16: the sub-assembly is morphophonemics. ; $proof$ = | sent13 & sent14 -> int1: the housemother is not acrocentric and is Gandhian.; sent6 -> int2: if the housemother is not acrocentric but it is Gandhian then it is not morphophonemics.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the housemother is not morphophonemics.; sent1 -> int4: if the housemother is not morphophonemics the fact that it is not a kind of a worst is not false.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ | DeductionInstance | the housemother is not acrocentric. | [
"the housemother is Gandhian.",
"if something is not acrocentric but it is Gandhian then that it is not morphophonemics is not wrong.",
"something does not worst if it is not morphophonemics."
] | [
"The house mother is not a snob.",
"The housemother is not a snob.",
"The house mother is not acrocentric."
] |
the sicklepod is a Camembert. | sent1: the sicklepod does prize sicklepod if the pyrrhotite is a turmeric. sent2: if something does prize sicklepod that it is not ducal and it is not a outwork does not hold. sent3: the pyrrhotite is a turmeric. sent4: something is not a Camembert if that it is both not ducal and not a outwork is false. | {B}{aa} | sent1: {C}{a} -> {A}{aa} sent2: (x): {A}x -> ¬(¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) sent3: {C}{a} sent4: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> ¬{B}x | [
"sent2 -> int1: the fact that the sicklepod is not ducal and not a outwork is incorrect if it does prize sicklepod.; sent1 & sent3 -> int2: the sicklepod does prize sicklepod.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the sicklepod is not ducal and it is not a outwork is incorrect.; sent4 -> int4: if the fact that the sicklepod is not ducal and it is not a outwork does not hold it is not a Camembert.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | [
"sent2 -> int1: {A}{aa} -> ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}); sent1 & sent3 -> int2: {A}{aa}; int1 & int2 -> int3: ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}); sent4 -> int4: ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> ¬{B}{aa}; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | [] | null | null | $hypothesis$ = the sicklepod is a Camembert. ; $context$ = sent1: the sicklepod does prize sicklepod if the pyrrhotite is a turmeric. sent2: if something does prize sicklepod that it is not ducal and it is not a outwork does not hold. sent3: the pyrrhotite is a turmeric. sent4: something is not a Camembert if that it is both not ducal and not a outwork is false. ; $proof$ = | sent2 -> int1: the fact that the sicklepod is not ducal and not a outwork is incorrect if it does prize sicklepod.; sent1 & sent3 -> int2: the sicklepod does prize sicklepod.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the sicklepod is not ducal and it is not a outwork is incorrect.; sent4 -> int4: if the fact that the sicklepod is not ducal and it is not a outwork does not hold it is not a Camembert.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ | DeductionInstance | if something does prize sicklepod that it is not ducal and it is not a outwork does not hold. | [
"the sicklepod does prize sicklepod if the pyrrhotite is a turmeric.",
"the pyrrhotite is a turmeric.",
"something is not a Camembert if that it is both not ducal and not a outwork is false."
] | [
"It is not a outwork and it is not ducal if there is a prize for it.",
"If the prize is not ducal and it is not an outwork, it does not hold.",
"If it is not a outwork and it is not ducal, then it is not a prize."
] |
the edaphosaurus is a Fissipedia. | sent1: if the spouse is not a pectoral the edaphosaurus is not a Fissipedia. sent2: the vitrification is not planetary. sent3: something is not a kind of a pectoral if that it is a kind of non-ventral thing that does not moil does not hold. sent4: if the fact that something is not a Slav and is not a neurohormone is wrong it is not ventral. sent5: that the spouse is a kind of non-ventral thing that does not moil is false if the vitrification is not planetary. | {C}{c} | sent1: ¬{B}{b} -> ¬{C}{c} sent2: ¬{A}{a} sent3: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> ¬{B}x sent4: (x): ¬(¬{DA}x & ¬{U}x) -> ¬{AA}x sent5: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬(¬{AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}) | [
"sent5 & sent2 -> int1: the fact that the spouse is a kind of non-ventral thing that does not moil does not hold.; sent3 -> int2: the spouse is not a pectoral if the fact that it is non-ventral and it does not moil does not hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the spouse is not a pectoral.; int3 & sent1 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | [
"sent5 & sent2 -> int1: ¬(¬{AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}); sent3 -> int2: ¬(¬{AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}) -> ¬{B}{b}; int1 & int2 -> int3: ¬{B}{b}; int3 & sent1 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | the brick is not ventral if that it is not Slav and is not a neurohormone does not hold. | ¬(¬{DA}{ho} & ¬{U}{ho}) -> ¬{AA}{ho} | 1 | [
"sent4 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | PROVED | $hypothesis$ = the edaphosaurus is a Fissipedia. ; $context$ = sent1: if the spouse is not a pectoral the edaphosaurus is not a Fissipedia. sent2: the vitrification is not planetary. sent3: something is not a kind of a pectoral if that it is a kind of non-ventral thing that does not moil does not hold. sent4: if the fact that something is not a Slav and is not a neurohormone is wrong it is not ventral. sent5: that the spouse is a kind of non-ventral thing that does not moil is false if the vitrification is not planetary. ; $proof$ = | sent5 & sent2 -> int1: the fact that the spouse is a kind of non-ventral thing that does not moil does not hold.; sent3 -> int2: the spouse is not a pectoral if the fact that it is non-ventral and it does not moil does not hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the spouse is not a pectoral.; int3 & sent1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ | DeductionInstance | that the spouse is a kind of non-ventral thing that does not moil is false if the vitrification is not planetary. | [
"the vitrification is not planetary.",
"something is not a kind of a pectoral if that it is a kind of non-ventral thing that does not moil does not hold.",
"if the spouse is not a pectoral the edaphosaurus is not a Fissipedia."
] | [
"It is false to say that the spouse is a kind of non-ventral thing.",
"If the vitrification is not planetary, the spouse is a kind of non-ventral thing.",
"If the vitrification is not planetary, the spouse is a non-ventral thing."
] |
the fact that there exists something such that if it is prudent and it is not Dantean then it is non-maleficent is incorrect. | sent1: there exists something such that if it is prudent and not non-Dantean then it is not maleficent. sent2: if a prudent thing is Dantean it is not maleficent. sent3: if something is prudent but it is not Dantean then it is non-maleficent. sent4: if something that is prudent is not Dantean then it is not non-maleficent. sent5: if the coattail is a kind of prudent thing that is Dantean then it is not maleficent. sent6: the fact that the coattail is maleficent is not wrong if it is both prudent and not Dantean. sent7: there is something such that if it is prudent and is not Dantean the fact that it is maleficent is not wrong. | ¬((Ex): ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> ¬{B}x) | sent1: (Ex): ({AA}x & {AB}x) -> ¬{B}x sent2: (x): ({AA}x & {AB}x) -> ¬{B}x sent3: (x): ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> ¬{B}x sent4: (x): ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> {B}x sent5: ({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> ¬{B}{aa} sent6: ({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa} sent7: (Ex): ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> {B}x | [
"sent3 -> int1: if the coattail is a kind of prudent thing that is not Dantean it is not maleficent.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | [
"sent3 -> int1: ({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> ¬{B}{aa}; int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | 2 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 6 | null | null | null | [] | null | null | $hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if it is prudent and it is not Dantean then it is non-maleficent is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it is prudent and not non-Dantean then it is not maleficent. sent2: if a prudent thing is Dantean it is not maleficent. sent3: if something is prudent but it is not Dantean then it is non-maleficent. sent4: if something that is prudent is not Dantean then it is not non-maleficent. sent5: if the coattail is a kind of prudent thing that is Dantean then it is not maleficent. sent6: the fact that the coattail is maleficent is not wrong if it is both prudent and not Dantean. sent7: there is something such that if it is prudent and is not Dantean the fact that it is maleficent is not wrong. ; $proof$ = | sent3 -> int1: if the coattail is a kind of prudent thing that is not Dantean it is not maleficent.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ | DeductionInstance | if something is prudent but it is not Dantean then it is non-maleficent. | [] | [
"if something is prudent but it is not Dantean then it is non-maleficent."
] |
the fact that there is something such that the fact that it does prize authoress and it is not litigious does not hold is not right. | sent1: there exists something such that the fact that it prizes authoress and is litigious is not true. sent2: there exists nothing that prizes authoress and is not litigious. sent3: there exists something such that that it is equitable and not grassless does not hold. sent4: the fact that the skin-diver is a coma and does not prize authoress is not true. sent5: there is nothing that prizes authoress and is litigious. sent6: the fact that something is unsuccessful and does not depreciate is not right if it begs. sent7: there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of behavioral thing that does not prefigure mallard does not hold. sent8: there exists something such that that it prizes Lycosidae and it is not a massicot is false. sent9: the fact that the skin-diver prizes authoress and it is litigious is not correct. sent10: there is something such that the fact that it does prefigure manhood and is not a fruitcake is not true. sent11: there exists nothing such that it prizes Lycosidae and it is not dysgenics. | ¬((Ex): ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x)) | sent1: (Ex): ¬({AA}x & {AB}x) sent2: (x): ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) sent3: (Ex): ¬({DG}x & ¬{IC}x) sent4: ¬({JG}{aa} & ¬{AA}{aa}) sent5: (x): ¬({AA}x & {AB}x) sent6: (x): {A}x -> ¬({I}x & ¬{BL}x) sent7: (Ex): ¬({GH}x & ¬{BE}x) sent8: (Ex): ¬({HT}x & ¬{DT}x) sent9: ¬({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) sent10: (Ex): ¬({JH}x & ¬{AR}x) sent11: (x): ¬({HT}x & ¬{CE}x) | [
"sent2 -> int1: that the skin-diver prizes authoress but it is not litigious is wrong.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | [
"sent2 -> int1: ¬({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}); int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | 2 | 2 | 10 | 0 | 10 | there exists something such that the fact that it is unsuccessful and it does not depreciate is false. | (Ex): ¬({I}x & ¬{BL}x) | 6 | [
"sent6 -> int2: if the candlelight does beg the fact that it is unsuccessful and does not depreciate is not right.;"
] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that the fact that it does prize authoress and it is not litigious does not hold is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that the fact that it prizes authoress and is litigious is not true. sent2: there exists nothing that prizes authoress and is not litigious. sent3: there exists something such that that it is equitable and not grassless does not hold. sent4: the fact that the skin-diver is a coma and does not prize authoress is not true. sent5: there is nothing that prizes authoress and is litigious. sent6: the fact that something is unsuccessful and does not depreciate is not right if it begs. sent7: there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of behavioral thing that does not prefigure mallard does not hold. sent8: there exists something such that that it prizes Lycosidae and it is not a massicot is false. sent9: the fact that the skin-diver prizes authoress and it is litigious is not correct. sent10: there is something such that the fact that it does prefigure manhood and is not a fruitcake is not true. sent11: there exists nothing such that it prizes Lycosidae and it is not dysgenics. ; $proof$ = | sent2 -> int1: that the skin-diver prizes authoress but it is not litigious is wrong.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ | DeductionInstance | there exists nothing that prizes authoress and is not litigious. | [] | [
"there exists nothing that prizes authoress and is not litigious."
] |
the fact that both the non-narrowness and the non-Palladianness happens is incorrect. | sent1: the prizing trichromacy occurs. sent2: that the chemotherapy and the enucleation occurs is right. sent3: the prizing Fuscoboletinus does not occur and the insectivorousness does not occur if the Shona happens. sent4: the hee-hawing does not occur. sent5: the stirring does not occur and the hurling does not occur if the prizing trichromacy occurs. sent6: the non-narrowness is triggered by the non-northernness. sent7: the prizing trichromacy but not the Palladianness happens. sent8: if the fact that the narrowing occurs and the prizing trichromacy does not occur is not right then the prizing trichromacy occurs. sent9: that the narrow happens and the prizing trichromacy does not occur is not true if the Palladianness happens. sent10: if both the chemotherapy and the dissimilarness occurs the Shonaness occurs. sent11: the northernness does not occur. sent12: that the insectivorousness does not occur triggers that both the prizing trichromacy and the northernness occurs. | ¬(¬{C} & ¬{B}) | sent1: {A} sent2: ({I} & {L}) sent3: {G} -> (¬{F} & ¬{E}) sent4: ¬{AJ} sent5: {A} -> (¬{GL} & ¬{EU}) sent6: ¬{D} -> ¬{C} sent7: ({A} & ¬{B}) sent8: ¬({C} & ¬{A}) -> {A} sent9: {B} -> ¬({C} & ¬{A}) sent10: ({I} & ¬{H}) -> {G} sent11: ¬{D} sent12: ¬{E} -> ({A} & {D}) | [
"sent7 -> int1: the Palladianness does not occur.; sent6 & sent11 -> int2: the fact that the narrowing does not occur hold.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | [
"sent7 -> int1: ¬{B}; sent6 & sent11 -> int2: ¬{C}; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | 2 | 2 | 9 | 0 | 9 | the fact that the stirring does not occur and the hurling does not occur is not false. | (¬{GL} & ¬{EU}) | 8 | [] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the fact that both the non-narrowness and the non-Palladianness happens is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the prizing trichromacy occurs. sent2: that the chemotherapy and the enucleation occurs is right. sent3: the prizing Fuscoboletinus does not occur and the insectivorousness does not occur if the Shona happens. sent4: the hee-hawing does not occur. sent5: the stirring does not occur and the hurling does not occur if the prizing trichromacy occurs. sent6: the non-narrowness is triggered by the non-northernness. sent7: the prizing trichromacy but not the Palladianness happens. sent8: if the fact that the narrowing occurs and the prizing trichromacy does not occur is not right then the prizing trichromacy occurs. sent9: that the narrow happens and the prizing trichromacy does not occur is not true if the Palladianness happens. sent10: if both the chemotherapy and the dissimilarness occurs the Shonaness occurs. sent11: the northernness does not occur. sent12: that the insectivorousness does not occur triggers that both the prizing trichromacy and the northernness occurs. ; $proof$ = | sent7 -> int1: the Palladianness does not occur.; sent6 & sent11 -> int2: the fact that the narrowing does not occur hold.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ | DeductionInstance | the prizing trichromacy but not the Palladianness happens. | [
"the non-narrowness is triggered by the non-northernness.",
"the northernness does not occur."
] | [
"The Palladianness does not happen.",
"The Palladianness doesn't happen."
] |
the fact that there exists something such that if it forces streaked then it is a kind of an unwillingness does not hold. | sent1: that if the propagator is the fitness then that the propagator is an unwillingness is right hold. sent2: if the Uruguayan prefigures sponge it does prefigure reflexivity. sent3: there is something such that if that it loses is not false it is semiotics. sent4: a Signora is a Phoxinus. sent5: if something is Masonic then it is a kind of an unwillingness. sent6: if something is a propagandist then it is an unwillingness. sent7: the gallbladder does force streaked if it is differential. sent8: the gauze is ichorous if it does force streaked. sent9: there exists something such that if it commingles preceptorship then it is propagandist. sent10: there is something such that if it does force cornbread it is a Phoxinus. sent11: if the Uruguayan does commingle Lithocarpus it is an unwillingness. sent12: if the deossification is impenetrable then it forces streaked. sent13: the Uruguayan does prefigure antiseptic if that it is a kind of a scud is not false. sent14: the fact that the Uruguayan forces streaked hold if it is a Chondrus. sent15: the Uruguayan is a Populus if it is an unwillingness. sent16: if the Uruguayan does force poltroonery that that it is not a kind of a bunion is true is false. sent17: there is something such that if it is a Mull that it does prefigure toast is true. sent18: if the Uruguayan does commingle suit then it is an unwillingness. sent19: the Uruguayan is an unwillingness if it forces streaked. sent20: there is something such that if it is paleoanthropological then it commingles suit. | ¬((Ex): {A}x -> {C}x) | sent1: {CN}{gn} -> {C}{gn} sent2: {M}{aa} -> {BS}{aa} sent3: (Ex): {DI}x -> {FC}x sent4: (x): {AB}x -> {GN}x sent5: (x): {IS}x -> {C}x sent6: (x): {BE}x -> {C}x sent7: {S}{ah} -> {A}{ah} sent8: {A}{ek} -> {CS}{ek} sent9: (Ex): {DT}x -> {BE}x sent10: (Ex): {H}x -> {GN}x sent11: {JI}{aa} -> {C}{aa} sent12: {CG}{ht} -> {A}{ht} sent13: {AH}{aa} -> {DF}{aa} sent14: {EU}{aa} -> {A}{aa} sent15: {C}{aa} -> {K}{aa} sent16: {EP}{aa} -> {CC}{aa} sent17: (Ex): {DP}x -> {II}x sent18: {EC}{aa} -> {C}{aa} sent19: {A}{aa} -> {C}{aa} sent20: (Ex): {CE}x -> {EC}x | [
"sent19 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | [
"sent19 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | 1 | 1 | 19 | 0 | 19 | there is something such that if it is a Signora it is a Phoxinus. | (Ex): {AB}x -> {GN}x | 2 | [
"sent4 -> int1: the suit is a kind of a Phoxinus if that it is a kind of a Signora is not incorrect.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | PROVED | $hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if it forces streaked then it is a kind of an unwillingness does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: that if the propagator is the fitness then that the propagator is an unwillingness is right hold. sent2: if the Uruguayan prefigures sponge it does prefigure reflexivity. sent3: there is something such that if that it loses is not false it is semiotics. sent4: a Signora is a Phoxinus. sent5: if something is Masonic then it is a kind of an unwillingness. sent6: if something is a propagandist then it is an unwillingness. sent7: the gallbladder does force streaked if it is differential. sent8: the gauze is ichorous if it does force streaked. sent9: there exists something such that if it commingles preceptorship then it is propagandist. sent10: there is something such that if it does force cornbread it is a Phoxinus. sent11: if the Uruguayan does commingle Lithocarpus it is an unwillingness. sent12: if the deossification is impenetrable then it forces streaked. sent13: the Uruguayan does prefigure antiseptic if that it is a kind of a scud is not false. sent14: the fact that the Uruguayan forces streaked hold if it is a Chondrus. sent15: the Uruguayan is a Populus if it is an unwillingness. sent16: if the Uruguayan does force poltroonery that that it is not a kind of a bunion is true is false. sent17: there is something such that if it is a Mull that it does prefigure toast is true. sent18: if the Uruguayan does commingle suit then it is an unwillingness. sent19: the Uruguayan is an unwillingness if it forces streaked. sent20: there is something such that if it is paleoanthropological then it commingles suit. ; $proof$ = | sent19 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ | DeductionInstance | the Uruguayan is an unwillingness if it forces streaked. | [] | [
"the Uruguayan is an unwillingness if it forces streaked."
] |
the venue is not jihadi but it commingles odium. | sent1: if something is not vaginal the venue is not jihadi but it commingles odium. sent2: the cardinal is not vaginal if there is something such that it is a tent. sent3: the venue is not vaginal but it is jihadi if there is something such that it does not commingle odium. sent4: the cardinal is a kind of non-vaginal thing that does commingle odium if there exists something such that it is not jihadi. sent5: there exists something such that it does prize tonometer. sent6: the tonometer does not prefigure canister and is a whitehead. sent7: there is something such that the fact that it does not prefigure canister and is a kind of a finalist is not true. sent8: if there is something such that it is cataplastic the venue is not a sniffler. sent9: if there is something such that the fact that it does not prefigure canister and is a kind of a finalist is false the cardinal is not vaginal. sent10: the cardinal does not prefigure canister and prefigures loot. | (¬{C}{b} & {B}{b}) | sent1: (x): ¬{A}x -> (¬{C}{b} & {B}{b}) sent2: (x): {AG}x -> ¬{A}{a} sent3: (x): ¬{B}x -> (¬{A}{b} & {C}{b}) sent4: (x): ¬{C}x -> (¬{A}{a} & {B}{a}) sent5: (Ex): {BN}x sent6: (¬{AA}{fo} & {EM}{fo}) sent7: (Ex): ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) sent8: (x): {JH}x -> ¬{DQ}{b} sent9: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) -> ¬{A}{a} sent10: (¬{AA}{a} & {JG}{a}) | [
"sent7 & sent9 -> int1: the cardinal is not vaginal.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that it is not vaginal.; int2 & sent1 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | [
"sent7 & sent9 -> int1: ¬{A}{a}; int1 -> int2: (Ex): ¬{A}x; int2 & sent1 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | 3 | 3 | 7 | 0 | 7 | null | null | null | [] | null | null | $hypothesis$ = the venue is not jihadi but it commingles odium. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not vaginal the venue is not jihadi but it commingles odium. sent2: the cardinal is not vaginal if there is something such that it is a tent. sent3: the venue is not vaginal but it is jihadi if there is something such that it does not commingle odium. sent4: the cardinal is a kind of non-vaginal thing that does commingle odium if there exists something such that it is not jihadi. sent5: there exists something such that it does prize tonometer. sent6: the tonometer does not prefigure canister and is a whitehead. sent7: there is something such that the fact that it does not prefigure canister and is a kind of a finalist is not true. sent8: if there is something such that it is cataplastic the venue is not a sniffler. sent9: if there is something such that the fact that it does not prefigure canister and is a kind of a finalist is false the cardinal is not vaginal. sent10: the cardinal does not prefigure canister and prefigures loot. ; $proof$ = | sent7 & sent9 -> int1: the cardinal is not vaginal.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that it is not vaginal.; int2 & sent1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ | DeductionInstance | there is something such that the fact that it does not prefigure canister and is a kind of a finalist is not true. | [
"if there is something such that the fact that it does not prefigure canister and is a kind of a finalist is false the cardinal is not vaginal.",
"if something is not vaginal the venue is not jihadi but it commingles odium."
] | [
"It is not true that it does not prefigure canister and is a kind of finalist.",
"It is not true that it does not figure a canister and is a kind of finalist."
] |
the filialness occurs. | sent1: if the typographicness and the capitalisticness occurs then the commingling Hera does not occur. sent2: the typographicness occurs. sent3: the non-filialness and the typographicness occurs if the capitalisticness does not occur. sent4: the fact that the capitalisticness occurs is right. | {D} | sent1: ({A} & {B}) -> ¬{C} sent2: {A} sent3: ¬{B} -> (¬{D} & {A}) sent4: {B} | [
"sent2 & sent4 -> int1: the typographicness and the capitalisticness happens.; sent1 & int1 -> int2: the commingling Hera does not occur.;"
] | UNKNOWN | [
"sent2 & sent4 -> int1: ({A} & {B}); sent1 & int1 -> int2: ¬{C};"
] | UNKNOWN | 4 | null | 1 | 0 | 1 | the filialness does not occur. | ¬{D} | 6 | [] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the filialness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: if the typographicness and the capitalisticness occurs then the commingling Hera does not occur. sent2: the typographicness occurs. sent3: the non-filialness and the typographicness occurs if the capitalisticness does not occur. sent4: the fact that the capitalisticness occurs is right. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ | DeductionInstance | the typographicness occurs. | [
"the fact that the capitalisticness occurs is right.",
"if the typographicness and the capitalisticness occurs then the commingling Hera does not occur."
] | [
"The meaning of the word occurs.",
"The lettering happens."
] |
the machine is not summery. | sent1: a non-affine thing prefigures rectum. sent2: the machine is lexicostatistics if it does not prefigure rectum. sent3: the machine does not prefigure rectum. sent4: The rectum does not prefigure machine. sent5: the quasar is a kind of a writ and it is windward. sent6: the Town is monotypic if it is esophageal and does not prefigure Lamaist. sent7: there exists something such that it does execute. sent8: the chuck does not prefigure rectum. sent9: everything is an affine. sent10: the machine is lexicostatistics. sent11: the Town is monotypic and is an intermediate. sent12: the machine is a kind of a nettle if the naphthoquinone forces repudiation. sent13: if the sibyl is a kind of a Leontief then the naphthoquinone does not force repudiation. sent14: if the sibyl commingles caffeinism then it is a Leontief. sent15: the machine is a kind of lexicostatistics thing that is summery if it does not prefigure rectum. sent16: the machine is a chelonian if something prefigures rectum and it is an affine. sent17: something is a Leontief if it does commingle caffeinism. sent18: the sibyl does prefigure rectum and it does commingle perphenazine if there exists something such that the fact that it executes is true. sent19: if something does not force repudiation then it is not a kind of an affine. sent20: if there is something such that it is monotypic then the naphthoquinone is intermediate and it does commingle caffeinism. sent21: the Town is a kind of esophageal thing that does not prefigure Lamaist. sent22: the machine is a Prometheus and it prizes Devanagari. sent23: if something is a Leontief that it does force repudiation hold. | ¬{AB}{a} | sent1: (x): ¬{B}x -> {A}x sent2: ¬{A}{a} -> {AA}{a} sent3: ¬{A}{a} sent4: ¬{AC}{aa} sent5: ({II}{di} & {FN}{di}) sent6: ({I}{d} & ¬{J}{d}) -> {G}{d} sent7: (Ex): {K}x sent8: ¬{A}{at} sent9: (x): {B}x sent10: {AA}{a} sent11: ({G}{d} & {F}{d}) sent12: {C}{b} -> {FJ}{a} sent13: {D}{c} -> ¬{C}{b} sent14: {E}{c} -> {D}{c} sent15: ¬{A}{a} -> ({AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) sent16: (x): ({A}x & {B}x) -> {EQ}{a} sent17: (x): {E}x -> {D}x sent18: (x): {K}x -> ({A}{c} & {H}{c}) sent19: (x): ¬{C}x -> ¬{B}x sent20: (x): {G}x -> ({F}{b} & {E}{b}) sent21: ({I}{d} & ¬{J}{d}) sent22: ({IK}{a} & {EJ}{a}) sent23: (x): {D}x -> {C}x | [
"sent15 & sent3 -> int1: the machine is lexicostatistics and is summery.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | [
"sent15 & sent3 -> int1: ({AA}{a} & {AB}{a}); int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | 2 | 2 | 21 | 0 | 21 | the machine is not summery. | ¬{AB}{a} | 8 | [
"sent1 -> int2: if the naphthoquinone is non-affine it does prefigure rectum.; sent19 -> int3: if the naphthoquinone does not force repudiation the fact that it is not affine hold.; sent11 -> int4: there is something such that it is monotypic and intermediate.;"
] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the machine is not summery. ; $context$ = sent1: a non-affine thing prefigures rectum. sent2: the machine is lexicostatistics if it does not prefigure rectum. sent3: the machine does not prefigure rectum. sent4: The rectum does not prefigure machine. sent5: the quasar is a kind of a writ and it is windward. sent6: the Town is monotypic if it is esophageal and does not prefigure Lamaist. sent7: there exists something such that it does execute. sent8: the chuck does not prefigure rectum. sent9: everything is an affine. sent10: the machine is lexicostatistics. sent11: the Town is monotypic and is an intermediate. sent12: the machine is a kind of a nettle if the naphthoquinone forces repudiation. sent13: if the sibyl is a kind of a Leontief then the naphthoquinone does not force repudiation. sent14: if the sibyl commingles caffeinism then it is a Leontief. sent15: the machine is a kind of lexicostatistics thing that is summery if it does not prefigure rectum. sent16: the machine is a chelonian if something prefigures rectum and it is an affine. sent17: something is a Leontief if it does commingle caffeinism. sent18: the sibyl does prefigure rectum and it does commingle perphenazine if there exists something such that the fact that it executes is true. sent19: if something does not force repudiation then it is not a kind of an affine. sent20: if there is something such that it is monotypic then the naphthoquinone is intermediate and it does commingle caffeinism. sent21: the Town is a kind of esophageal thing that does not prefigure Lamaist. sent22: the machine is a Prometheus and it prizes Devanagari. sent23: if something is a Leontief that it does force repudiation hold. ; $proof$ = | sent15 & sent3 -> int1: the machine is lexicostatistics and is summery.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ | DeductionInstance | the machine is a kind of lexicostatistics thing that is summery if it does not prefigure rectum. | [
"the machine does not prefigure rectum."
] | [
"the machine is a kind of lexicostatistics thing that is summery if it does not prefigure rectum."
] |
the infiniteness does not occur. | sent1: the fact that the electrotherapy happens but the pneumogastricness does not occur does not hold if the disarming does not occur. sent2: the spondaicness does not occur if the marking or the prefiguring danaid or both occurs. sent3: if the commingling end-all occurs then the awkwardness and the non-historicalness occurs. sent4: the prefiguring Mergus does not occur if the fact that the electrotherapy and the non-pneumogastricness happens is not correct. sent5: if the heathlikeness does not occur both the prefiguring danaid and the prostheticness occurs. sent6: both the commingling end-all and the collapsibleness happens if that the diabolatry does not occur is not false. sent7: that both the non-capableness and the prefiguring Zealander occurs is not right if the territoriality does not occur. sent8: the fact that the territoriality does not occur hold if the fact that the fact that the electrocautery does not occur and the commingling Trinity does not occur is not right is true. sent9: if the earthquake happens the fact that the infiniteness happens and the laparotomy does not occur is false. sent10: the prizing suspense is prevented by that the laparotomy but not the infiniteness happens. sent11: that the laparotomy does not occur is right. sent12: if the spondaicness does not occur that the electrocautery does not occur and the commingling Trinity does not occur does not hold. sent13: the heathlikeness does not occur if the awkwardness but not the historicalness occurs. sent14: if the prefiguring Mergus does not occur then the insaneness but not the earthquake happens. sent15: if the territoriality happens that both the prizing typing and the comprehensiveness happens does not hold. sent16: if that the incapableness and the prefiguring Zealander happens is false the disarming does not occur. | ¬{A} | sent1: ¬{H} -> ¬({F} & ¬{G}) sent2: ({P} v {O}) -> ¬{N} sent3: {U} -> ({T} & ¬{S}) sent4: ¬({F} & ¬{G}) -> ¬{E} sent5: ¬{R} -> ({O} & {Q}) sent6: ¬{AB} -> ({U} & {AA}) sent7: ¬{K} -> ¬(¬{J} & {I}) sent8: ¬(¬{M} & ¬{L}) -> ¬{K} sent9: {C} -> ¬({A} & ¬{B}) sent10: ({B} & ¬{A}) -> ¬{GI} sent11: ¬{B} sent12: ¬{N} -> ¬(¬{M} & ¬{L}) sent13: ({T} & ¬{S}) -> ¬{R} sent14: ¬{E} -> ({D} & ¬{C}) sent15: {K} -> ¬({FO} & ¬{JH}) sent16: ¬(¬{J} & {I}) -> ¬{H} | [
"void -> assump1: Let's assume that the infiniteness occurs.; assump1 & sent11 -> int1: the infiniteness occurs and the laparotomy does not occur.;"
] | UNKNOWN | [
"void -> assump1: {A}; assump1 & sent11 -> int1: ({A} & ¬{B});"
] | UNKNOWN | 3 | null | 14 | 0 | 14 | the prizing suspense does not occur. | ¬{GI} | 18 | [] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the infiniteness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the electrotherapy happens but the pneumogastricness does not occur does not hold if the disarming does not occur. sent2: the spondaicness does not occur if the marking or the prefiguring danaid or both occurs. sent3: if the commingling end-all occurs then the awkwardness and the non-historicalness occurs. sent4: the prefiguring Mergus does not occur if the fact that the electrotherapy and the non-pneumogastricness happens is not correct. sent5: if the heathlikeness does not occur both the prefiguring danaid and the prostheticness occurs. sent6: both the commingling end-all and the collapsibleness happens if that the diabolatry does not occur is not false. sent7: that both the non-capableness and the prefiguring Zealander occurs is not right if the territoriality does not occur. sent8: the fact that the territoriality does not occur hold if the fact that the fact that the electrocautery does not occur and the commingling Trinity does not occur is not right is true. sent9: if the earthquake happens the fact that the infiniteness happens and the laparotomy does not occur is false. sent10: the prizing suspense is prevented by that the laparotomy but not the infiniteness happens. sent11: that the laparotomy does not occur is right. sent12: if the spondaicness does not occur that the electrocautery does not occur and the commingling Trinity does not occur does not hold. sent13: the heathlikeness does not occur if the awkwardness but not the historicalness occurs. sent14: if the prefiguring Mergus does not occur then the insaneness but not the earthquake happens. sent15: if the territoriality happens that both the prizing typing and the comprehensiveness happens does not hold. sent16: if that the incapableness and the prefiguring Zealander happens is false the disarming does not occur. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ | DeductionInstance | that the laparotomy does not occur is right. | [] | [
"that the laparotomy does not occur is right."
] |
the antitauon is undemonstrative. | sent1: the dinghy is not a Pinctada and solarizes if there is something such that it housebreaks. sent2: something does solarize if it mythicizes. sent3: the dinghy is not a Tarkovsky. sent4: the Shetland is not undemonstrative if that the glyph is a kind of undemonstrative thing that is not a Pinctada is not true. sent5: everything is geophytic or it housebreaks or both. sent6: the anjou housebreaks. sent7: the redhead prizes presidency if the Wake does housebreak. sent8: the fact that the antitauon is a kind of a nursery hold. sent9: the antitauon is not undemonstrative if that the anjou is undemonstrative but it does not solarize is not true. sent10: the antitauon is not a kind of a Pinctada. sent11: something is photic if it does prize presidency. sent12: if the antitauon is not a Pinctada then it mythicizes. sent13: the glyph mythicizes if the redhead does mythicizes and is not photic. sent14: something is a Chekhov if it does prize Annunciation. sent15: if something that does not mythicize solarizes then it is undemonstrative. sent16: the granadillo does not mythicize. sent17: if something is photic then it does not mythicize. sent18: if the dinghy is not a Tarkovsky the fact that it is geophytic and it does prize presidency is correct. sent19: the redhead prizes presidency if the Wake is geophytic. | {B}{aa} | sent1: (x): {H}x -> (¬{D}{dc} & {C}{dc}) sent2: (x): {A}x -> {C}x sent3: ¬{I}{dc} sent4: ¬({B}{c} & ¬{D}{c}) -> ¬{B}{b} sent5: (x): ({G}x v {H}x) sent6: {H}{a} sent7: {H}{e} -> {F}{d} sent8: {HP}{aa} sent9: ¬({B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) -> ¬{B}{aa} sent10: ¬{D}{aa} sent11: (x): {F}x -> {E}x sent12: ¬{D}{aa} -> {A}{aa} sent13: ({A}{d} & ¬{E}{d}) -> {A}{c} sent14: (x): {DR}x -> {IC}x sent15: (x): (¬{A}x & {C}x) -> {B}x sent16: ¬{A}{ig} sent17: (x): {E}x -> ¬{A}x sent18: ¬{I}{dc} -> ({G}{dc} & {F}{dc}) sent19: {G}{e} -> {F}{d} | [
"sent2 -> int1: the antitauon does solarize if it does mythicize.; sent12 & sent10 -> int2: the antitauon does mythicize.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the antitauon solarizes.;"
] | UNKNOWN | [
"sent2 -> int1: {A}{aa} -> {C}{aa}; sent12 & sent10 -> int2: {A}{aa}; int1 & int2 -> int3: {C}{aa};"
] | UNKNOWN | 3 | null | 16 | 0 | 16 | the dinghy is undemonstrative. | {B}{dc} | 6 | [
"sent15 -> int4: if the dinghy does not mythicize but it solarizes then it is undemonstrative.; sent17 -> int5: the dinghy does not mythicize if it is photic.; sent11 -> int6: the dinghy is photic if the fact that it does prize presidency is not false.; sent18 & sent3 -> int7: the dinghy is geophytic and does prize presidency.; int7 -> int8: that the dinghy prizes presidency is not incorrect.; int6 & int8 -> int9: the dinghy is photic.; int5 & int9 -> int10: that the dinghy does not mythicize is true.; sent6 -> int11: there is something such that that it does housebreak hold.; int11 & sent1 -> int12: the dinghy is not a kind of a Pinctada but it solarizes.; int12 -> int13: the dinghy does solarize.; int10 & int13 -> int14: the dinghy does not mythicize and does solarize.; int4 & int14 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | PROVED | $hypothesis$ = the antitauon is undemonstrative. ; $context$ = sent1: the dinghy is not a Pinctada and solarizes if there is something such that it housebreaks. sent2: something does solarize if it mythicizes. sent3: the dinghy is not a Tarkovsky. sent4: the Shetland is not undemonstrative if that the glyph is a kind of undemonstrative thing that is not a Pinctada is not true. sent5: everything is geophytic or it housebreaks or both. sent6: the anjou housebreaks. sent7: the redhead prizes presidency if the Wake does housebreak. sent8: the fact that the antitauon is a kind of a nursery hold. sent9: the antitauon is not undemonstrative if that the anjou is undemonstrative but it does not solarize is not true. sent10: the antitauon is not a kind of a Pinctada. sent11: something is photic if it does prize presidency. sent12: if the antitauon is not a Pinctada then it mythicizes. sent13: the glyph mythicizes if the redhead does mythicizes and is not photic. sent14: something is a Chekhov if it does prize Annunciation. sent15: if something that does not mythicize solarizes then it is undemonstrative. sent16: the granadillo does not mythicize. sent17: if something is photic then it does not mythicize. sent18: if the dinghy is not a Tarkovsky the fact that it is geophytic and it does prize presidency is correct. sent19: the redhead prizes presidency if the Wake is geophytic. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ | DeductionInstance | something does solarize if it mythicizes. | [
"if the antitauon is not a Pinctada then it mythicizes.",
"the antitauon is not a kind of a Pinctada."
] | [
"If it mythicizes, something does solarize.",
"If it mythicizes, it does solarize."
] |
there exists something such that if it is not a scalar that it does not prefigure begonia and does commingle bedder is wrong. | sent1: the fact that that the polystyrene is both not scalar and metastable is not true is correct if it is not a kind of a self-preservation. sent2: that something does prefigure begonia and it does commingle bedder is incorrect if it is not a kind of a scalar. sent3: there is something such that if it is not a scalar then it does not prefigure begonia and does commingle bedder. sent4: there is something such that if it is not dyadic the fact that it does commingle Scaramouch and it is a kind of a partiality is not correct. sent5: if the blast is not a kind of a scalar then that it prefigures begonia and commingles bedder does not hold. sent6: the fact that the necktie is not probabilistic and commingles Milady does not hold if it prefigures exode. sent7: something that is not corporatist is not achlorhydric but Caesarian. sent8: the fact that the blast does not prefigure begonia but it commingles bedder if the blast is not scalar is correct. sent9: if something is not a kind of a scalar then it does not prefigure begonia and commingles bedder. sent10: if that the blast is not a mooring hold then the fact that it does not prize kingbolt and it commingles Kreisler is not right. sent11: that the blast is both not a scow and amalgamative does not hold if the fact that it does not commingle demography is right. sent12: if the blast is a kind of a scalar then the fact that it does not prefigure begonia and does commingle bedder is false. sent13: there exists something such that if it is not a scalar then the fact that it prefigures begonia and it commingles bedder is not right. sent14: if the blast is dyadic the fact that it is not a kind of a echoencephalogram and commingles bedder is not right. sent15: there exists something such that if it does not haul then the fact that it is syncretic and it is an appearance is wrong. sent16: that the skidpan is a kind of non-unmilitary thing that does commingle bedder does not hold if it does not correlate. sent17: that the blast does not prefigure begonia but it is unargumentative is wrong if it does not prefigure chug. sent18: there exists something such that if it is scalar that it does not prefigure begonia and does commingle bedder is not correct. sent19: the fact that something does not prefigure begonia but it does commingle bedder is false if it is a scalar. | (Ex): ¬{A}x -> ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) | sent1: ¬{FR}{bk} -> ¬(¬{A}{bk} & {DK}{bk}) sent2: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬({AA}x & {AB}x) sent3: (Ex): ¬{A}x -> (¬{AA}x & {AB}x) sent4: (Ex): ¬{JH}x -> ¬({GF}x & {JI}x) sent5: ¬{A}{aa} -> ¬({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) sent6: {BB}{eo} -> ¬(¬{IJ}{eo} & {FC}{eo}) sent7: (x): ¬{DF}x -> (¬{K}x & {AF}x) sent8: ¬{A}{aa} -> (¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) sent9: (x): ¬{A}x -> (¬{AA}x & {AB}x) sent10: ¬{HK}{aa} -> ¬(¬{DB}{aa} & {CB}{aa}) sent11: ¬{IA}{aa} -> ¬(¬{T}{aa} & {AD}{aa}) sent12: {A}{aa} -> ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) sent13: (Ex): ¬{A}x -> ¬({AA}x & {AB}x) sent14: {JH}{aa} -> ¬(¬{L}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) sent15: (Ex): ¬{IQ}x -> ¬({GO}x & {GC}x) sent16: ¬{FQ}{gu} -> ¬(¬{BI}{gu} & {AB}{gu}) sent17: ¬{DJ}{aa} -> ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & {FT}{aa}) sent18: (Ex): {A}x -> ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) sent19: (x): {A}x -> ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) | [] | UNKNOWN | [] | UNKNOWN | 2 | null | 19 | 0 | 19 | null | null | null | [] | null | null | $hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is not a scalar that it does not prefigure begonia and does commingle bedder is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that that the polystyrene is both not scalar and metastable is not true is correct if it is not a kind of a self-preservation. sent2: that something does prefigure begonia and it does commingle bedder is incorrect if it is not a kind of a scalar. sent3: there is something such that if it is not a scalar then it does not prefigure begonia and does commingle bedder. sent4: there is something such that if it is not dyadic the fact that it does commingle Scaramouch and it is a kind of a partiality is not correct. sent5: if the blast is not a kind of a scalar then that it prefigures begonia and commingles bedder does not hold. sent6: the fact that the necktie is not probabilistic and commingles Milady does not hold if it prefigures exode. sent7: something that is not corporatist is not achlorhydric but Caesarian. sent8: the fact that the blast does not prefigure begonia but it commingles bedder if the blast is not scalar is correct. sent9: if something is not a kind of a scalar then it does not prefigure begonia and commingles bedder. sent10: if that the blast is not a mooring hold then the fact that it does not prize kingbolt and it commingles Kreisler is not right. sent11: that the blast is both not a scow and amalgamative does not hold if the fact that it does not commingle demography is right. sent12: if the blast is a kind of a scalar then the fact that it does not prefigure begonia and does commingle bedder is false. sent13: there exists something such that if it is not a scalar then the fact that it prefigures begonia and it commingles bedder is not right. sent14: if the blast is dyadic the fact that it is not a kind of a echoencephalogram and commingles bedder is not right. sent15: there exists something such that if it does not haul then the fact that it is syncretic and it is an appearance is wrong. sent16: that the skidpan is a kind of non-unmilitary thing that does commingle bedder does not hold if it does not correlate. sent17: that the blast does not prefigure begonia but it is unargumentative is wrong if it does not prefigure chug. sent18: there exists something such that if it is scalar that it does not prefigure begonia and does commingle bedder is not correct. sent19: the fact that something does not prefigure begonia but it does commingle bedder is false if it is a scalar. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ | DeductionInstance | there is something such that if it is not a scalar then it does not prefigure begonia and does commingle bedder. | [
"there exists something such that if it is scalar that it does not prefigure begonia and does commingle bedder is not correct."
] | [
"there is something such that if it is not a scalar then it does not prefigure begonia and does commingle bedder."
] |
the currier is an expressionism. | sent1: the currier is not androgynous. sent2: that the pisser is not a porterage and is not unsociable is not correct if it shrimps. sent3: the carpospore is not an expressionism. sent4: if the currier is not an expressionism it is not promotional. sent5: the currier does prefigure backlog and is not unlucky. sent6: something is an expressionism and is a fielding if it does not commingle Mariehamn. sent7: if the pisser educates then the fact that it does commingle Mariehamn hold. sent8: the pisser educates if that it is both not a porterage and a sociable is false. sent9: the pisser does force tuille or it is felicitous or both. sent10: if the currier is an indium and it is promotional then it is not a fielding. sent11: something is both endermic and not an indium if it is an expressionism. sent12: the fact that the currier is not promotional is not incorrect. sent13: the currier is not a kind of a pyemia if it is harsh and it is non-promotional. sent14: if the votary does not educate then it is both an ironside and not a pheno-safranine. sent15: the currier fields. sent16: if the currier is an indium that is not promotional it is not a fielding. | {A}{a} | sent1: ¬{IQ}{a} sent2: {I}{b} -> ¬(¬{H}{b} & {G}{b}) sent3: ¬{A}{gn} sent4: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬{AB}{a} sent5: ({U}{a} & ¬{EK}{a}) sent6: (x): ¬{C}x -> ({A}x & {B}x) sent7: {D}{b} -> {C}{b} sent8: ¬(¬{H}{b} & {G}{b}) -> {D}{b} sent9: ({J}{b} v {K}{b}) sent10: ({AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{a} sent11: (x): {A}x -> ({HM}x & ¬{AA}x) sent12: ¬{AB}{a} sent13: ({JK}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) -> ¬{EC}{a} sent14: ¬{D}{u} -> ({DK}{u} & ¬{ET}{u}) sent15: {B}{a} sent16: ({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{a} | [] | UNKNOWN | [] | UNKNOWN | 4 | null | 14 | 0 | 14 | that the currier is not an expressionism is not false. | ¬{A}{a} | 7 | [] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the currier is an expressionism. ; $context$ = sent1: the currier is not androgynous. sent2: that the pisser is not a porterage and is not unsociable is not correct if it shrimps. sent3: the carpospore is not an expressionism. sent4: if the currier is not an expressionism it is not promotional. sent5: the currier does prefigure backlog and is not unlucky. sent6: something is an expressionism and is a fielding if it does not commingle Mariehamn. sent7: if the pisser educates then the fact that it does commingle Mariehamn hold. sent8: the pisser educates if that it is both not a porterage and a sociable is false. sent9: the pisser does force tuille or it is felicitous or both. sent10: if the currier is an indium and it is promotional then it is not a fielding. sent11: something is both endermic and not an indium if it is an expressionism. sent12: the fact that the currier is not promotional is not incorrect. sent13: the currier is not a kind of a pyemia if it is harsh and it is non-promotional. sent14: if the votary does not educate then it is both an ironside and not a pheno-safranine. sent15: the currier fields. sent16: if the currier is an indium that is not promotional it is not a fielding. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ | DeductionInstance | if the pisser educates then the fact that it does commingle Mariehamn hold. | [
"the currier is not androgynous."
] | [
"if the pisser educates then the fact that it does commingle Mariehamn hold."
] |
that there exists something such that if it is a rorqual then the fact that it is not Jacobean is true is not correct. | sent1: if something prizes Livingston it does not prefigure Mennonite. sent2: there is something such that if it is a rorqual it is a Jacobean. sent3: if the hyson is a rorqual then it is a Jacobean. sent4: if something is a kind of a rorqual it is not a kind of a Jacobean. sent5: if the hyson is a comprehensibility it is not a kind of a Bakelite. sent6: the hyson is not a octameter if the fact that it is a kind of a Carmelite hold. sent7: the fact that the hyson is not a rorqual is correct if it is dicotyledonous. sent8: the Cameroonian is not a kind of a Jacobean if it prizes westerly. sent9: there is something such that if it is serious it does not prefigure leading. sent10: if the hyson unmasks then it is not a Jacobean. sent11: something is a kind of a Jacobean if it is a rorqual. | ¬((Ex): {A}x -> ¬{C}x) | sent1: (x): {CA}x -> ¬{J}x sent2: (Ex): {A}x -> {C}x sent3: {A}{aa} -> {C}{aa} sent4: (x): {A}x -> ¬{C}x sent5: {AA}{aa} -> ¬{GS}{aa} sent6: {DC}{aa} -> ¬{EH}{aa} sent7: {AP}{aa} -> ¬{A}{aa} sent8: {GU}{m} -> ¬{C}{m} sent9: (Ex): {O}x -> ¬{CS}x sent10: {HM}{aa} -> ¬{C}{aa} sent11: (x): {A}x -> {C}x | [
"sent4 -> int1: if the hyson is a kind of a rorqual then it is not Jacobean.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | [
"sent4 -> int1: {A}{aa} -> ¬{C}{aa}; int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | 2 | 2 | 10 | 0 | 10 | null | null | null | [] | null | null | $hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if it is a rorqual then the fact that it is not Jacobean is true is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if something prizes Livingston it does not prefigure Mennonite. sent2: there is something such that if it is a rorqual it is a Jacobean. sent3: if the hyson is a rorqual then it is a Jacobean. sent4: if something is a kind of a rorqual it is not a kind of a Jacobean. sent5: if the hyson is a comprehensibility it is not a kind of a Bakelite. sent6: the hyson is not a octameter if the fact that it is a kind of a Carmelite hold. sent7: the fact that the hyson is not a rorqual is correct if it is dicotyledonous. sent8: the Cameroonian is not a kind of a Jacobean if it prizes westerly. sent9: there is something such that if it is serious it does not prefigure leading. sent10: if the hyson unmasks then it is not a Jacobean. sent11: something is a kind of a Jacobean if it is a rorqual. ; $proof$ = | sent4 -> int1: if the hyson is a kind of a rorqual then it is not Jacobean.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ | DeductionInstance | if something is a kind of a rorqual it is not a kind of a Jacobean. | [] | [
"if something is a kind of a rorqual it is not a kind of a Jacobean."
] |
that either the cricketer does prefigure personhood or it does not smooth or both does not hold. | sent1: if there is something such that that it is a kind of an embodiment is true the blanquillo does not prefigure softy and prizes hippopotamus. sent2: if the blanquillo does not prefigure personhood the cricketer does prefigure personhood and/or it is not smooth. sent3: something is an embodiment. sent4: something that does not prefigure softy and does prize hippopotamus does not prefigure personhood. | ¬({D}{b} v ¬{F}{b}) | sent1: (x): {A}x -> (¬{B}{a} & {C}{a}) sent2: ¬{D}{a} -> ({D}{b} v ¬{F}{b}) sent3: (Ex): {A}x sent4: (x): (¬{B}x & {C}x) -> ¬{D}x | [
"sent3 & sent1 -> int1: the blanquillo does not prefigure softy and does prize hippopotamus.; sent4 -> int2: the blanquillo does not prefigure personhood if it does not prefigure softy and it prizes hippopotamus.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the blanquillo does not prefigure personhood.; int3 & sent2 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | [
"sent3 & sent1 -> int1: (¬{B}{a} & {C}{a}); sent4 -> int2: (¬{B}{a} & {C}{a}) -> ¬{D}{a}; int1 & int2 -> int3: ¬{D}{a}; int3 & sent2 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | [] | null | null | $hypothesis$ = that either the cricketer does prefigure personhood or it does not smooth or both does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if there is something such that that it is a kind of an embodiment is true the blanquillo does not prefigure softy and prizes hippopotamus. sent2: if the blanquillo does not prefigure personhood the cricketer does prefigure personhood and/or it is not smooth. sent3: something is an embodiment. sent4: something that does not prefigure softy and does prize hippopotamus does not prefigure personhood. ; $proof$ = | sent3 & sent1 -> int1: the blanquillo does not prefigure softy and does prize hippopotamus.; sent4 -> int2: the blanquillo does not prefigure personhood if it does not prefigure softy and it prizes hippopotamus.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the blanquillo does not prefigure personhood.; int3 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ | DeductionInstance | something is an embodiment. | [
"if there is something such that that it is a kind of an embodiment is true the blanquillo does not prefigure softy and prizes hippopotamus.",
"something that does not prefigure softy and does prize hippopotamus does not prefigure personhood.",
"if the blanquillo does not prefigure personhood the cricketer does prefigure personhood and/or it is not smooth."
] | [
"An embodiment is something.",
"It is an embodiment.",
"Something is a representation."
] |
there exists something such that if that it is non-Romany thing that is not a Kissimmee does not hold that it does not prize normality hold. | sent1: there is something such that if it is a Romany it does not prize normality. sent2: if that the flatworm is not bedless and not implausible is false it is not Romany. sent3: the ouzo does not prize normality if it is a kind of non-Romany thing that is not a Kissimmee. sent4: there is something such that if it is not Hebraic and is not follicular then it is non-guttural. sent5: if the fact that the ouzo is non-Romany a Kissimmee is not correct then it does not prize normality. sent6: there is something such that if that it does not prefigure Saxony and is a toxicology is false then it is not a kind of an additive. | (Ex): ¬(¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> ¬{B}x | sent1: (Ex): {AA}x -> ¬{B}x sent2: ¬(¬{BJ}{cj} & ¬{G}{cj}) -> ¬{AA}{cj} sent3: (¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> ¬{B}{aa} sent4: (Ex): (¬{AS}x & ¬{HA}x) -> ¬{DO}x sent5: ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> ¬{B}{aa} sent6: (Ex): ¬(¬{CI}x & {BF}x) -> ¬{U}x | [] | UNKNOWN | [] | UNKNOWN | 2 | null | 6 | 0 | 6 | null | null | null | [] | null | null | $hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if that it is non-Romany thing that is not a Kissimmee does not hold that it does not prize normality hold. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if it is a Romany it does not prize normality. sent2: if that the flatworm is not bedless and not implausible is false it is not Romany. sent3: the ouzo does not prize normality if it is a kind of non-Romany thing that is not a Kissimmee. sent4: there is something such that if it is not Hebraic and is not follicular then it is non-guttural. sent5: if the fact that the ouzo is non-Romany a Kissimmee is not correct then it does not prize normality. sent6: there is something such that if that it does not prefigure Saxony and is a toxicology is false then it is not a kind of an additive. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ | DeductionInstance | there is something such that if it is a Romany it does not prize normality. | [
"there is something such that if that it does not prefigure Saxony and is a toxicology is false then it is not a kind of an additive."
] | [
"there is something such that if it is a Romany it does not prize normality."
] |
the ombudsman is not Stravinskyan. | sent1: the voltage does not keratinize. sent2: the ombudsman is a unionism if it does not keratinize and it is a Saxony. sent3: the fact that something is a kind of a Marconi if that it is a slum that is not a Marconi does not hold is not false. sent4: that that the anoa is a kind of a slum but it is not a Marconi is not correct if there exists something such that it does not slum hold. sent5: the eurypterid is an inspectorate if it does not prize SSRI and it is a kind of a Saxony. sent6: the ombudsman is not a Sitwell. sent7: if something that is not a unionism is Stravinskyan it commingles wake. sent8: the fact that the introvert does gross is right. sent9: the ombudsman does slum. sent10: the bacteroid is Stravinskyan. sent11: if the ombudsman does keratinize and it is a jest it is not restless. sent12: there is something such that the fact that it is actinic and forces voltage is false. sent13: the anoa is a kind of a redeployment if the introvert is not non-gross. sent14: if something is a kind of a redeployment then it is both not a unionism and Stravinskyan. sent15: that the ombudsman is not a Davys but it is wasteful is not incorrect. sent16: if that something is literate thing that is a lunatic is incorrect then that it is not a slum is right. sent17: the fact that the ombudsman is a Lygaeidae hold. sent18: the ombudsman does not keratinize but it is a kind of a Saxony. sent19: the uncle is not a kind of a Saxony. sent20: that the ombudsman is a literate and a lunatic is not right if the stagehand does not force voltage. | ¬{C}{a} | sent1: ¬{AA}{ig} sent2: (¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> {B}{a} sent3: (x): ¬({A}x & ¬{CK}x) -> {CK}x sent4: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬({A}{ce} & ¬{CK}{ce}) sent5: (¬{AQ}{hk} & {AB}{hk}) -> {DO}{hk} sent6: ¬{DE}{a} sent7: (x): (¬{B}x & {C}x) -> {AP}x sent8: {E}{b} sent9: {A}{a} sent10: {C}{ar} sent11: ({AA}{a} & {AD}{a}) -> ¬{AU}{a} sent12: (Ex): ¬({I}x & {H}x) sent13: {E}{b} -> {D}{ce} sent14: (x): {D}x -> (¬{B}x & {C}x) sent15: (¬{BH}{a} & {AL}{a}) sent16: (x): ¬({F}x & {G}x) -> ¬{A}x sent17: {N}{a} sent18: (¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) sent19: ¬{AB}{cm} sent20: ¬{H}{c} -> ¬({F}{a} & {G}{a}) | [
"sent2 & sent18 -> int1: the ombudsman is a unionism.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the ombudsman is a unionism and it does slum.;"
] | UNKNOWN | [
"sent2 & sent18 -> int1: {B}{a}; int1 & sent9 -> int2: ({B}{a} & {A}{a});"
] | UNKNOWN | 3 | null | 17 | 0 | 17 | the anoa does commingle wake and it is a Marconi. | ({AP}{ce} & {CK}{ce}) | 7 | [
"sent7 -> int3: the anoa does commingle wake if it is not a kind of a unionism and it is Stravinskyan.; sent14 -> int4: the anoa is not a unionism but Stravinskyan if it is a redeployment.; sent13 & sent8 -> int5: the anoa is a kind of a redeployment.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the anoa is not a kind of a unionism and is Stravinskyan.; int3 & int6 -> int7: the anoa does commingle wake.; sent3 -> int8: if that the anoa slums but it is not a kind of a Marconi does not hold then it is a kind of a Marconi.; sent16 -> int9: if that the ombudsman is both a literate and a lunatic is not true it does not slum.;"
] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the ombudsman is not Stravinskyan. ; $context$ = sent1: the voltage does not keratinize. sent2: the ombudsman is a unionism if it does not keratinize and it is a Saxony. sent3: the fact that something is a kind of a Marconi if that it is a slum that is not a Marconi does not hold is not false. sent4: that that the anoa is a kind of a slum but it is not a Marconi is not correct if there exists something such that it does not slum hold. sent5: the eurypterid is an inspectorate if it does not prize SSRI and it is a kind of a Saxony. sent6: the ombudsman is not a Sitwell. sent7: if something that is not a unionism is Stravinskyan it commingles wake. sent8: the fact that the introvert does gross is right. sent9: the ombudsman does slum. sent10: the bacteroid is Stravinskyan. sent11: if the ombudsman does keratinize and it is a jest it is not restless. sent12: there is something such that the fact that it is actinic and forces voltage is false. sent13: the anoa is a kind of a redeployment if the introvert is not non-gross. sent14: if something is a kind of a redeployment then it is both not a unionism and Stravinskyan. sent15: that the ombudsman is not a Davys but it is wasteful is not incorrect. sent16: if that something is literate thing that is a lunatic is incorrect then that it is not a slum is right. sent17: the fact that the ombudsman is a Lygaeidae hold. sent18: the ombudsman does not keratinize but it is a kind of a Saxony. sent19: the uncle is not a kind of a Saxony. sent20: that the ombudsman is a literate and a lunatic is not right if the stagehand does not force voltage. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ | DeductionInstance | the ombudsman is a unionism if it does not keratinize and it is a Saxony. | [
"the ombudsman does not keratinize but it is a kind of a Saxony.",
"the ombudsman does slum."
] | [
"The ombudsman is a unionism if it does not change it's 888-270-6611 888-270-6611 888-270-6611 888-270-6611 888-270-6611 888-270-6611 888-270-6611 888-270-6611 888-270-6611 888-270-6611 888-270-6611 888-270-6611 888-270-6611 888-270-6611 888-270-6611 888-270-6611 888-270-6611 888-270-6611 888-270-6611 888-270-6611 888-270-6611 888-270-6611 888-270-6611 888-270-6611 888-270-6611 888-270-6611 888-270-6611 888-270-6611 888-270-6611 888-270-6611 888-270-6611 888-270-6611 888-270-6611 888-270-6611 888-270-6611 888-270-6611 888-270-6611 888-270-6611 888-270-6611 888-270-6611 888-270-6611 888-270-6611 888-270-6611 888-270-6611",
"The ombudsman is a unionism if it doesn't change it's 888-270-6611 888-270-6611 888-270-6611 888-270-6611 888-270-6611 888-270-6611 888-270-6611 888-270-6611 888-270-6611 888-270-6611 888-270-6611 888-270-6611 888-270-6611 888-270-6611 888-270-6611 888-270-6611 888-270-6611 888-270-6611 888-270-6611 888-270-6611 888-270-6611 888-270-6611 888-270-6611 888-270-6611 888-270-6611 888-270-6611 888-270-6611 888-270-6611 888-270-6611 888-270-6611 888-270-6611 888-270-6611 888-270-6611 888-270-6611 888-270-6611 888-270-6611 888-270-6611 888-270-6611 888-270-6611 888-270-6611 888-270-6611 888-270-6611 888-270-6611"
] |
the fact that the macrophage is a Graptophyllum that is not a kind of an imperial does not hold. | sent1: the scribble is not a villeinage if that the Tree is a villeinage and it is endocentric does not hold. sent2: something is amphitheatric and commingles promising if it is not a villeinage. sent3: if the touchscreen does not prefigure Tocharian then the fact that that the macrophage does prefigure hogshead and is not imperial is right is wrong. sent4: if the shirttail does not commingle Komi either the macrophage is not imperial or it prefigures Tocharian or both. sent5: something that does not commingle Komi is a kind of a Graptophyllum that is not a kind of an imperial. sent6: if the sodomite is not a salutatory then the CF does commingle Komi and it is a Graptophyllum. sent7: there is something such that it does commingle Komi. sent8: if either something is not an imperial or it prefigures Tocharian or both the touchscreen is not an imperial. sent9: if the CF prefigures hogshead and does commingle Komi then the shirttail does not commingle Komi. sent10: the CF prefigures hogshead if something is amphitheatric thing that does commingle promising. sent11: if the touchscreen does not prefigure hogshead that the macrophage is a Graptophyllum and it is imperial does not hold. sent12: that the Tree is a villeinage and is endocentric is false. sent13: either the recitalist commingles Annunciation or it is not a kind of a Soweto or both. sent14: if something prefigures Tocharian it does not prefigure hogshead. sent15: the touchscreen does prefigure Tocharian if there exists something such that it does commingle Komi. sent16: that the macrophage is a Graptophyllum but not imperial is not correct if the touchscreen does not prefigure hogshead. | ¬({D}{b} & ¬{E}{b}) | sent1: ¬({K}{g} & {L}{g}) -> ¬{K}{f} sent2: (x): ¬{K}x -> ({H}x & {G}x) sent3: ¬{B}{a} -> ¬({C}{b} & ¬{E}{b}) sent4: ¬{A}{c} -> (¬{E}{b} v {B}{b}) sent5: (x): ¬{A}x -> ({D}x & ¬{E}x) sent6: ¬{F}{e} -> ({A}{d} & {D}{d}) sent7: (Ex): {A}x sent8: (x): (¬{E}x v {B}x) -> ¬{E}{a} sent9: ({C}{d} & {A}{d}) -> ¬{A}{c} sent10: (x): ({H}x & {G}x) -> {C}{d} sent11: ¬{C}{a} -> ¬({D}{b} & {E}{b}) sent12: ¬({K}{g} & {L}{g}) sent13: ({J}{h} v ¬{I}{h}) sent14: (x): {B}x -> ¬{C}x sent15: (x): {A}x -> {B}{a} sent16: ¬{C}{a} -> ¬({D}{b} & ¬{E}{b}) | [
"sent7 & sent15 -> int1: the touchscreen prefigures Tocharian.; sent14 -> int2: if the fact that the touchscreen does not prefigure Tocharian is not true then it does not prefigure hogshead.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the touchscreen does not prefigure hogshead.; int3 & sent16 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | [
"sent7 & sent15 -> int1: {B}{a}; sent14 -> int2: {B}{a} -> ¬{C}{a}; int1 & int2 -> int3: ¬{C}{a}; int3 & sent16 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | 3 | 3 | 12 | 0 | 12 | the macrophage is a Graptophyllum but it is not an imperial. | ({D}{b} & ¬{E}{b}) | 5 | [
"sent5 -> int4: the macrophage is a Graptophyllum that is not imperial if it does not commingle Komi.;"
] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the fact that the macrophage is a Graptophyllum that is not a kind of an imperial does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the scribble is not a villeinage if that the Tree is a villeinage and it is endocentric does not hold. sent2: something is amphitheatric and commingles promising if it is not a villeinage. sent3: if the touchscreen does not prefigure Tocharian then the fact that that the macrophage does prefigure hogshead and is not imperial is right is wrong. sent4: if the shirttail does not commingle Komi either the macrophage is not imperial or it prefigures Tocharian or both. sent5: something that does not commingle Komi is a kind of a Graptophyllum that is not a kind of an imperial. sent6: if the sodomite is not a salutatory then the CF does commingle Komi and it is a Graptophyllum. sent7: there is something such that it does commingle Komi. sent8: if either something is not an imperial or it prefigures Tocharian or both the touchscreen is not an imperial. sent9: if the CF prefigures hogshead and does commingle Komi then the shirttail does not commingle Komi. sent10: the CF prefigures hogshead if something is amphitheatric thing that does commingle promising. sent11: if the touchscreen does not prefigure hogshead that the macrophage is a Graptophyllum and it is imperial does not hold. sent12: that the Tree is a villeinage and is endocentric is false. sent13: either the recitalist commingles Annunciation or it is not a kind of a Soweto or both. sent14: if something prefigures Tocharian it does not prefigure hogshead. sent15: the touchscreen does prefigure Tocharian if there exists something such that it does commingle Komi. sent16: that the macrophage is a Graptophyllum but not imperial is not correct if the touchscreen does not prefigure hogshead. ; $proof$ = | sent7 & sent15 -> int1: the touchscreen prefigures Tocharian.; sent14 -> int2: if the fact that the touchscreen does not prefigure Tocharian is not true then it does not prefigure hogshead.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the touchscreen does not prefigure hogshead.; int3 & sent16 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ | DeductionInstance | there is something such that it does commingle Komi. | [
"the touchscreen does prefigure Tocharian if there exists something such that it does commingle Komi.",
"if something prefigures Tocharian it does not prefigure hogshead.",
"that the macrophage is a Graptophyllum but not imperial is not correct if the touchscreen does not prefigure hogshead."
] | [
"It does commingle Komi.",
"There is something that commingles Komi.",
"It is possible that it commingles Komi."
] |
the metalwork is a preliminary. | sent1: if the inventory is not a kind of an impala then it commingles comprehensibility and/or is not a preliminary. sent2: if the inventory is not a hyperope it is rigid thing that is not a chincapin. sent3: if that the metalwork is not a preliminary is not wrong then it is either an impala or not a second-in-command or both. sent4: the inventory does not commingle comprehensibility if the metalwork is not a second-in-command. sent5: that something does not commingle comprehensibility but it is ceremonious is not right if it is not a chincapin. sent6: the inventory does commingle comprehensibility. sent7: the galbanum is not a preliminary. sent8: the inventory is a preliminary. sent9: if the metalwork is a kind of an impala then the inventory does commingle comprehensibility. sent10: if that the fact that something is both not a Fissipedia and a hyperope is right is not correct then it is not a hyperope. sent11: The comprehensibility does commingle inventory. | {A}{a} | sent1: ¬{AA}{b} -> ({B}{b} v ¬{A}{b}) sent2: ¬{F}{b} -> ({E}{b} & ¬{D}{b}) sent3: ¬{A}{a} -> ({AA}{a} v ¬{AB}{a}) sent4: ¬{AB}{a} -> ¬{B}{b} sent5: (x): ¬{D}x -> ¬(¬{B}x & {C}x) sent6: {B}{b} sent7: ¬{A}{hu} sent8: {A}{b} sent9: {AA}{a} -> {B}{b} sent10: (x): ¬(¬{H}x & {F}x) -> ¬{F}x sent11: {AD}{ab} | [
"void -> assump1: Let's assume that the metalwork is not a preliminary.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the metalwork is an impala and/or it is not a second-in-command.;"
] | UNKNOWN | [
"void -> assump1: ¬{A}{a}; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: ({AA}{a} v ¬{AB}{a});"
] | UNKNOWN | 4 | null | 8 | 0 | 8 | the metalwork is not a preliminary. | ¬{A}{a} | 6 | [
"sent5 -> int2: the fact that that the inventory does not commingle comprehensibility and is ceremonious does not hold if the fact that the inventory is not a kind of a chincapin is correct is true.; sent10 -> int3: if the fact that the inventory is not a Fissipedia but it is a hyperope is wrong then it is not a kind of a hyperope.;"
] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the metalwork is a preliminary. ; $context$ = sent1: if the inventory is not a kind of an impala then it commingles comprehensibility and/or is not a preliminary. sent2: if the inventory is not a hyperope it is rigid thing that is not a chincapin. sent3: if that the metalwork is not a preliminary is not wrong then it is either an impala or not a second-in-command or both. sent4: the inventory does not commingle comprehensibility if the metalwork is not a second-in-command. sent5: that something does not commingle comprehensibility but it is ceremonious is not right if it is not a chincapin. sent6: the inventory does commingle comprehensibility. sent7: the galbanum is not a preliminary. sent8: the inventory is a preliminary. sent9: if the metalwork is a kind of an impala then the inventory does commingle comprehensibility. sent10: if that the fact that something is both not a Fissipedia and a hyperope is right is not correct then it is not a hyperope. sent11: The comprehensibility does commingle inventory. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ | DeductionInstance | if that the metalwork is not a preliminary is not wrong then it is either an impala or not a second-in-command or both. | [] | [
"if that the metalwork is not a preliminary is not wrong then it is either an impala or not a second-in-command or both."
] |
the fact that there exists something such that if it is a pteropogon it does not commingle Pharsalus is wrong. | sent1: if something is a kind of a emendation then it is not a lymphangiogram. sent2: there exists something such that if it humbles then it is not periodontics. sent3: if the Communist is a kind of a funeral-residence it is not a toxicognath. sent4: there is something such that if it is a brim it is not quiet. sent5: there exists something such that if it is a SSRI it is not a kind of a postmortem. sent6: the Communist is not a diocesan if it is a toxicognath. sent7: if the Communist is a pteropogon then it does not commingle Pharsalus. sent8: the Scholastic is not chiromantic if it does prefigure dullness. sent9: something does not prize anthropolatry if the fact that it is anaclitic is true. sent10: there exists something such that if it is a pteropogon it does commingle Pharsalus. sent11: there is something such that if it is minimal then it is not a kind of a lux. sent12: the Communist is not a Shaktist if it is a kind of a SSRI. sent13: the Communist commingles Pharsalus if it is a kind of a pteropogon. sent14: the Communist is not a pteropogon if it is instrumental. | ¬((Ex): {A}x -> ¬{C}x) | sent1: (x): {HT}x -> ¬{GO}x sent2: (Ex): {IQ}x -> ¬{CM}x sent3: {IN}{aa} -> ¬{IT}{aa} sent4: (Ex): {N}x -> ¬{AH}x sent5: (Ex): {BT}x -> ¬{DB}x sent6: {IT}{aa} -> ¬{GD}{aa} sent7: {A}{aa} -> ¬{C}{aa} sent8: {DR}{g} -> ¬{HO}{g} sent9: (x): {DO}x -> ¬{AO}x sent10: (Ex): {A}x -> {C}x sent11: (Ex): {FJ}x -> ¬{EN}x sent12: {BT}{aa} -> ¬{CA}{aa} sent13: {A}{aa} -> {C}{aa} sent14: {HB}{aa} -> ¬{A}{aa} | [
"sent7 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | [
"sent7 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | 1 | 1 | 13 | 0 | 13 | there exists something such that if it is anaclitic it does not prize anthropolatry. | (Ex): {DO}x -> ¬{AO}x | 2 | [
"sent9 -> int1: the leucocytozoan does not prize anthropolatry if it is anaclitic.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | PROVED | $hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if it is a pteropogon it does not commingle Pharsalus is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is a kind of a emendation then it is not a lymphangiogram. sent2: there exists something such that if it humbles then it is not periodontics. sent3: if the Communist is a kind of a funeral-residence it is not a toxicognath. sent4: there is something such that if it is a brim it is not quiet. sent5: there exists something such that if it is a SSRI it is not a kind of a postmortem. sent6: the Communist is not a diocesan if it is a toxicognath. sent7: if the Communist is a pteropogon then it does not commingle Pharsalus. sent8: the Scholastic is not chiromantic if it does prefigure dullness. sent9: something does not prize anthropolatry if the fact that it is anaclitic is true. sent10: there exists something such that if it is a pteropogon it does commingle Pharsalus. sent11: there is something such that if it is minimal then it is not a kind of a lux. sent12: the Communist is not a Shaktist if it is a kind of a SSRI. sent13: the Communist commingles Pharsalus if it is a kind of a pteropogon. sent14: the Communist is not a pteropogon if it is instrumental. ; $proof$ = | sent7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ | DeductionInstance | if the Communist is a pteropogon then it does not commingle Pharsalus. | [] | [
"if the Communist is a pteropogon then it does not commingle Pharsalus."
] |
there is something such that if it does not educate and is not a foreshank then it does prize Japanese. | sent1: if that something does not whelp and it does not prefigure notification is correct then it examines. sent2: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not a kind of a clientele and it is not a kind of a twang is not incorrect it is a kind of a roughage. sent3: that if the barrelfish is not an idleness and it is not a kind of the Pentecostal then the barrelfish does educate is true. sent4: there exists something such that if it is not prodromal and does prize gasp it is preclinical. sent5: there exists something such that if it is a kind of legitimate thing that does not disoblige it does prize giver. sent6: if the gasp is not rationalistic but it is intolerant then it is a kind of a Pentecostal. sent7: the fact that the Calypso does prize Japanese is correct if it does not educate and is not a foreshank. sent8: there is something such that if it elopes and is not a kind of a A-bomb it is a kind of a Bougainville. sent9: the fact that the Calypso commingles quarryman is not incorrect if it does not prize Japanese and is erythroid. sent10: there is something such that if it is a peach and it is not intolerant then it overjoys. sent11: if the Calypso is a chink and is not a foreshank then it is a Adzhar. sent12: if the loom is a ascolichen and is not neurotoxic the fact that it prizes Japanese is not false. sent13: there exists something such that if it does not disapprove and it does prize gasp it is aptitudinal. sent14: there exists something such that if it does not force autonomy and is a kind of a Scaramouch then that it does commingle Calypso is correct. sent15: the fact that the Calypso prefigures antifreeze hold if it does not prize Japanese and it is not a picot. sent16: the Calypso legitimates if it is not foolish but a foreshank. sent17: there is something such that if it is not a picket and it is not a ammoniac then it does commingle periclase. sent18: there is something such that if it does educate and is not a foreshank it does prize Japanese. sent19: there is something such that if it is non-Romance a roughage then it does commingle Pharsalus. sent20: if the Calypso does not prize Japanese but it is not non-zygotic then it is nordic. sent21: if the Calypso does educate and is not a foreshank it prizes Japanese. | (Ex): (¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> {B}x | sent1: (x): (¬{GP}x & ¬{DI}x) -> {BC}x sent2: (Ex): (¬{BU}x & ¬{GF}x) -> {CT}x sent3: (¬{AG}{an} & ¬{HN}{an}) -> {AA}{an} sent4: (Ex): (¬{JE}x & {DA}x) -> {DF}x sent5: (Ex): ({ER}x & ¬{J}x) -> {DH}x sent6: (¬{HJ}{gh} & {AP}{gh}) -> {HN}{gh} sent7: (¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa} sent8: (Ex): ({IR}x & ¬{AS}x) -> {CL}x sent9: (¬{B}{aa} & {DG}{aa}) -> {P}{aa} sent10: (Ex): ({EH}x & ¬{AP}x) -> {CN}x sent11: ({EC}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> {AD}{aa} sent12: ({C}{cd} & ¬{GT}{cd}) -> {B}{cd} sent13: (Ex): (¬{FA}x & {DA}x) -> {CP}x sent14: (Ex): (¬{CF}x & {IM}x) -> {CB}x sent15: (¬{B}{aa} & ¬{BL}{aa}) -> {GA}{aa} sent16: (¬{HE}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> {ER}{aa} sent17: (Ex): (¬{JJ}x & ¬{IG}x) -> {BO}x sent18: (Ex): ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> {B}x sent19: (Ex): (¬{EU}x & {CT}x) -> {HP}x sent20: (¬{B}{aa} & {DB}{aa}) -> {CJ}{aa} sent21: ({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa} | [
"sent7 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | [
"sent7 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | 1 | 1 | 20 | 0 | 20 | there is something such that if it does not whelp and it does not prefigure notification it examines. | (Ex): (¬{GP}x & ¬{DI}x) -> {BC}x | 2 | [
"sent1 -> int1: if the peel does not whelp and it does not prefigure notification the fact that it does examine hold.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | PROVED | $hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it does not educate and is not a foreshank then it does prize Japanese. ; $context$ = sent1: if that something does not whelp and it does not prefigure notification is correct then it examines. sent2: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not a kind of a clientele and it is not a kind of a twang is not incorrect it is a kind of a roughage. sent3: that if the barrelfish is not an idleness and it is not a kind of the Pentecostal then the barrelfish does educate is true. sent4: there exists something such that if it is not prodromal and does prize gasp it is preclinical. sent5: there exists something such that if it is a kind of legitimate thing that does not disoblige it does prize giver. sent6: if the gasp is not rationalistic but it is intolerant then it is a kind of a Pentecostal. sent7: the fact that the Calypso does prize Japanese is correct if it does not educate and is not a foreshank. sent8: there is something such that if it elopes and is not a kind of a A-bomb it is a kind of a Bougainville. sent9: the fact that the Calypso commingles quarryman is not incorrect if it does not prize Japanese and is erythroid. sent10: there is something such that if it is a peach and it is not intolerant then it overjoys. sent11: if the Calypso is a chink and is not a foreshank then it is a Adzhar. sent12: if the loom is a ascolichen and is not neurotoxic the fact that it prizes Japanese is not false. sent13: there exists something such that if it does not disapprove and it does prize gasp it is aptitudinal. sent14: there exists something such that if it does not force autonomy and is a kind of a Scaramouch then that it does commingle Calypso is correct. sent15: the fact that the Calypso prefigures antifreeze hold if it does not prize Japanese and it is not a picot. sent16: the Calypso legitimates if it is not foolish but a foreshank. sent17: there is something such that if it is not a picket and it is not a ammoniac then it does commingle periclase. sent18: there is something such that if it does educate and is not a foreshank it does prize Japanese. sent19: there is something such that if it is non-Romance a roughage then it does commingle Pharsalus. sent20: if the Calypso does not prize Japanese but it is not non-zygotic then it is nordic. sent21: if the Calypso does educate and is not a foreshank it prizes Japanese. ; $proof$ = | sent7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ | DeductionInstance | the fact that the Calypso does prize Japanese is correct if it does not educate and is not a foreshank. | [] | [
"the fact that the Calypso does prize Japanese is correct if it does not educate and is not a foreshank."
] |
the capulin is a kind of an okra and/or it is not causative. | sent1: if the fluorite is not unsuccessful then the bast does not commingle kingcup. sent2: something does not acquire if the fact that it does acquire and is non-shamanist does not hold. sent3: the bast acquires. sent4: the fluorite is sidereal or it is not cyanobacterial or both. sent5: if there is something such that it is shamanist then the capulin is either an okra or noncausative or both. sent6: the bast is an okra and/or it does not acquire. sent7: if the bast does acquire the fluorite is shamanist. sent8: something is a kind of an idleness and it is a Moroccan. sent9: the fact that something acquires and is not shamanist is not right if it does not commingle kingcup. sent10: if an idleness is Moroccan the inkstand is not a kind of a petcock. sent11: the capulin is shamanist and/or it is causative. sent12: the capulin acquires. sent13: either the capulin does acquire or it is not a kind of an okra or both. | ({D}{c} v ¬{C}{c}) | sent1: ¬{F}{b} -> ¬{E}{a} sent2: (x): ¬({A}x & ¬{B}x) -> ¬{A}x sent3: {A}{a} sent4: ({FE}{b} v ¬{GK}{b}) sent5: (x): {B}x -> ({D}{c} v ¬{C}{c}) sent6: ({D}{a} v ¬{A}{a}) sent7: {A}{a} -> {B}{b} sent8: (Ex): ({I}x & {H}x) sent9: (x): ¬{E}x -> ¬({A}x & ¬{B}x) sent10: (x): ({I}x & {H}x) -> ¬{G}{d} sent11: ({B}{c} v {C}{c}) sent12: {A}{c} sent13: ({A}{c} v ¬{D}{c}) | [
"sent7 & sent3 -> int1: the fluorite is shamanist.; int1 -> int2: something is shamanist.; int2 & sent5 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | [
"sent7 & sent3 -> int1: {B}{b}; int1 -> int2: (Ex): {B}x; int2 & sent5 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | 3 | 3 | 10 | 0 | 10 | the fact that the capulin is an okra and/or is not causative is not right. | ¬({D}{c} v ¬{C}{c}) | 8 | [
"sent2 -> int3: if the fact that the bast acquires but it is not shamanist is not true then it does not acquires.; sent9 -> int4: if the bast does not commingle kingcup then the fact that it acquires and it is not shamanist does not hold.; sent8 & sent10 -> int5: that the inkstand is not a petcock is not false.; int5 -> int6: something is not a petcock.;"
] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the capulin is a kind of an okra and/or it is not causative. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fluorite is not unsuccessful then the bast does not commingle kingcup. sent2: something does not acquire if the fact that it does acquire and is non-shamanist does not hold. sent3: the bast acquires. sent4: the fluorite is sidereal or it is not cyanobacterial or both. sent5: if there is something such that it is shamanist then the capulin is either an okra or noncausative or both. sent6: the bast is an okra and/or it does not acquire. sent7: if the bast does acquire the fluorite is shamanist. sent8: something is a kind of an idleness and it is a Moroccan. sent9: the fact that something acquires and is not shamanist is not right if it does not commingle kingcup. sent10: if an idleness is Moroccan the inkstand is not a kind of a petcock. sent11: the capulin is shamanist and/or it is causative. sent12: the capulin acquires. sent13: either the capulin does acquire or it is not a kind of an okra or both. ; $proof$ = | sent7 & sent3 -> int1: the fluorite is shamanist.; int1 -> int2: something is shamanist.; int2 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ | DeductionInstance | if the bast does acquire the fluorite is shamanist. | [
"the bast acquires.",
"if there is something such that it is shamanist then the capulin is either an okra or noncausative or both."
] | [
"The bast is a shaman.",
"The bast is a shamanist."
] |
there is something such that if it is not a plane and it is not a two-timer then it does force protoarcheology. | sent1: if something does not prefigure praseodymium and it does not force crier then it is a shamble. sent2: if something is not a plane and it is not a two-timer it does force protoarcheology. | (Ex): (¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> {B}x | sent1: (x): (¬{BJ}x & ¬{EJ}x) -> {H}x sent2: (x): (¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> {B}x | [
"sent2 -> int1: if the fact that the danger is both not a plane and not a two-timer is not false it forces protoarcheology.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | [
"sent2 -> int1: (¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa}; int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | there is something such that if it does not prefigure praseodymium and it does not force crier then the fact that it is a shamble is correct. | (Ex): (¬{BJ}x & ¬{EJ}x) -> {H}x | 2 | [
"sent1 -> int2: that the teak is a shamble hold if it does not prefigure praseodymium and does not force crier.; int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | PROVED | $hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is not a plane and it is not a two-timer then it does force protoarcheology. ; $context$ = sent1: if something does not prefigure praseodymium and it does not force crier then it is a shamble. sent2: if something is not a plane and it is not a two-timer it does force protoarcheology. ; $proof$ = | sent2 -> int1: if the fact that the danger is both not a plane and not a two-timer is not false it forces protoarcheology.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ | DeductionInstance | if something is not a plane and it is not a two-timer it does force protoarcheology. | [] | [
"if something is not a plane and it is not a two-timer it does force protoarcheology."
] |
the weigela is corinthian. | sent1: the nitrite is an expressionism. sent2: if the nitrite is small-capitalization then the weigela is corinthian. sent3: if the weigela is a kind of an expressionism that the nitrite is corinthian hold. sent4: the weigela is an expressionism if the nitrite is corinthian. sent5: something is not corinthian if it is an expressionism. | {C}{b} | sent1: {A}{a} sent2: {B}{a} -> {C}{b} sent3: {A}{b} -> {C}{a} sent4: {C}{a} -> {A}{b} sent5: (x): {A}x -> ¬{C}x | [] | UNKNOWN | [] | UNKNOWN | 2 | null | 3 | 0 | 3 | the fact that the weigela is not corinthian hold. | ¬{C}{b} | 4 | [
"sent5 -> int1: the weigela is not corinthian if it is an expressionism.;"
] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the weigela is corinthian. ; $context$ = sent1: the nitrite is an expressionism. sent2: if the nitrite is small-capitalization then the weigela is corinthian. sent3: if the weigela is a kind of an expressionism that the nitrite is corinthian hold. sent4: the weigela is an expressionism if the nitrite is corinthian. sent5: something is not corinthian if it is an expressionism. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ | DeductionInstance | if the nitrite is small-capitalization then the weigela is corinthian. | [
"the weigela is an expressionism if the nitrite is corinthian."
] | [
"if the nitrite is small-capitalization then the weigela is corinthian."
] |
the fact that there is something such that if it is not synaptic it is not shelflike and it is ferric is not correct. | sent1: the letterer is not shelflike but it is ferric if it is not synaptic. sent2: if the letterer is not synaptic it is ferric. sent3: there exists something such that if it is a pile then it is not a kind of a prefix and it is a kind of an instigator. sent4: there exists something such that if it is not synaptic it is ferric. sent5: something is not a Kinosternidae but it does reminisce if it is not a kind of a lampblack. | ¬((Ex): ¬{A}x -> (¬{AA}x & {AB}x)) | sent1: ¬{A}{aa} -> (¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) sent2: ¬{A}{aa} -> {AB}{aa} sent3: (Ex): {DS}x -> (¬{FC}x & {FI}x) sent4: (Ex): ¬{A}x -> {AB}x sent5: (x): ¬{BG}x -> (¬{IE}x & {GG}x) | [
"sent1 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | [
"sent1 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 4 | there is something such that if it is not a lampblack then it is not a kind of a Kinosternidae and reminisces. | (Ex): ¬{BG}x -> (¬{IE}x & {GG}x) | 2 | [
"sent5 -> int1: the dickey is not a kind of a Kinosternidae and reminisces if it is not a kind of a lampblack.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | PROVED | $hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if it is not synaptic it is not shelflike and it is ferric is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the letterer is not shelflike but it is ferric if it is not synaptic. sent2: if the letterer is not synaptic it is ferric. sent3: there exists something such that if it is a pile then it is not a kind of a prefix and it is a kind of an instigator. sent4: there exists something such that if it is not synaptic it is ferric. sent5: something is not a Kinosternidae but it does reminisce if it is not a kind of a lampblack. ; $proof$ = | sent1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ | DeductionInstance | the letterer is not shelflike but it is ferric if it is not synaptic. | [] | [
"the letterer is not shelflike but it is ferric if it is not synaptic."
] |
there is something such that if that it is hard and/or is not side does not hold then that it does not prize disaster is true. | sent1: there exists something such that if the fact that it is stannic and/or it is not extropic is not true it is not scapular. sent2: the fact that the abseiler does prize disaster is not right if the fact that it either is hard or sides or both is incorrect. sent3: if something either redeposits or does not parch or both it is not a kind of a backstitch. sent4: if that the abseiler either is hard or does not side or both does not hold then it does prize disaster. sent5: something that either is hard or is non-side or both does not prize disaster. | (Ex): ¬({AA}x v ¬{AB}x) -> ¬{B}x | sent1: (Ex): ¬({EP}x v ¬{JK}x) -> ¬{AJ}x sent2: ¬({AA}{aa} v {AB}{aa}) -> ¬{B}{aa} sent3: (x): ({BQ}x v ¬{GC}x) -> ¬{FQ}x sent4: ¬({AA}{aa} v ¬{AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa} sent5: (x): ({AA}x v ¬{AB}x) -> ¬{B}x | [] | UNKNOWN | [] | UNKNOWN | 2 | null | 5 | 0 | 5 | null | null | null | [] | null | null | $hypothesis$ = there is something such that if that it is hard and/or is not side does not hold then that it does not prize disaster is true. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if the fact that it is stannic and/or it is not extropic is not true it is not scapular. sent2: the fact that the abseiler does prize disaster is not right if the fact that it either is hard or sides or both is incorrect. sent3: if something either redeposits or does not parch or both it is not a kind of a backstitch. sent4: if that the abseiler either is hard or does not side or both does not hold then it does prize disaster. sent5: something that either is hard or is non-side or both does not prize disaster. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ | DeductionInstance | there exists something such that if the fact that it is stannic and/or it is not extropic is not true it is not scapular. | [
"something that either is hard or is non-side or both does not prize disaster."
] | [
"there exists something such that if the fact that it is stannic and/or it is not extropic is not true it is not scapular."
] |
the latanier is a nonpartisan or is not a ironworks or both. | sent1: if the RH is fisheye either the latanier is not partisan or it is a kind of a ironworks or both. sent2: if the RH is fisheye the latanier is a nonpartisan or it is not a kind of a ironworks or both. sent3: if the RH is not a king the fact that the latanier is a nonpartisan and/or not a ironworks is not right. sent4: something is fisheye if it is a king. sent5: if the holdout is not a cytokine then that the RH does prefigure lantern-fly but it is not fisheye does not hold. sent6: the muscadine does prefigure lantern-fly. sent7: the latanier is insectan. sent8: something is a ironworks if that it prefigures lantern-fly is not wrong. sent9: the RH does prefigure lantern-fly or it is a kind of a nonpartisan or both if the latanier is fisheye. sent10: the freshwater does prize roping. sent11: either the assegai is a kind of a king or it is not substantival or both. sent12: if the fact that the latanier is not a ironworks is wrong the RH is nonpartisan and/or is fisheye. sent13: the RH prefigures lantern-fly. sent14: if the latanier is fisheye then it is a nonpartisan. sent15: the latanier is a kind of a nonpartisan and/or it is a kind of a ironworks. sent16: the latanier prefigures lantern-fly. sent17: the RH is nonpartisan and/or does not prefigure lantern-fly if the latanier is a ironworks. | ({D}{b} v ¬{E}{b}) | sent1: {C}{a} -> ({D}{b} v {E}{b}) sent2: {C}{a} -> ({D}{b} v ¬{E}{b}) sent3: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬({D}{b} v ¬{E}{b}) sent4: (x): {A}x -> {C}x sent5: ¬{F}{c} -> ¬({B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) sent6: {B}{fk} sent7: {AJ}{b} sent8: (x): {B}x -> {E}x sent9: {C}{b} -> ({B}{a} v {D}{a}) sent10: {G}{d} sent11: ({A}{df} v ¬{AM}{df}) sent12: {E}{b} -> ({D}{a} v {C}{a}) sent13: {B}{a} sent14: {C}{b} -> {D}{b} sent15: ({D}{b} v {E}{b}) sent16: {B}{b} sent17: {E}{b} -> ({D}{a} v ¬{B}{a}) | [
"sent4 -> int1: the RH is fisheye if it is a king.;"
] | UNKNOWN | [
"sent4 -> int1: {A}{a} -> {C}{a};"
] | UNKNOWN | 3 | null | 15 | 0 | 15 | that the latanier is a kind of a nonpartisan and/or it is not a ironworks is false. | ¬({D}{b} v ¬{E}{b}) | 7 | [] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the latanier is a nonpartisan or is not a ironworks or both. ; $context$ = sent1: if the RH is fisheye either the latanier is not partisan or it is a kind of a ironworks or both. sent2: if the RH is fisheye the latanier is a nonpartisan or it is not a kind of a ironworks or both. sent3: if the RH is not a king the fact that the latanier is a nonpartisan and/or not a ironworks is not right. sent4: something is fisheye if it is a king. sent5: if the holdout is not a cytokine then that the RH does prefigure lantern-fly but it is not fisheye does not hold. sent6: the muscadine does prefigure lantern-fly. sent7: the latanier is insectan. sent8: something is a ironworks if that it prefigures lantern-fly is not wrong. sent9: the RH does prefigure lantern-fly or it is a kind of a nonpartisan or both if the latanier is fisheye. sent10: the freshwater does prize roping. sent11: either the assegai is a kind of a king or it is not substantival or both. sent12: if the fact that the latanier is not a ironworks is wrong the RH is nonpartisan and/or is fisheye. sent13: the RH prefigures lantern-fly. sent14: if the latanier is fisheye then it is a nonpartisan. sent15: the latanier is a kind of a nonpartisan and/or it is a kind of a ironworks. sent16: the latanier prefigures lantern-fly. sent17: the RH is nonpartisan and/or does not prefigure lantern-fly if the latanier is a ironworks. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ | DeductionInstance | something is fisheye if it is a king. | [] | [
"something is fisheye if it is a king."
] |
the rumble favors. | sent1: if there exists something such that it is a Llyr that is a rectum that the bed does prize Mennonite is not false. sent2: that the rumble is a favor is correct if the bed prizes Mennonite. sent3: the camisole is a Llyr and it is a rectum. | {D}{b} | sent1: (x): ({A}x & {B}x) -> {C}{a} sent2: {C}{a} -> {D}{b} sent3: ({A}{aa} & {B}{aa}) | [
"sent3 -> int1: there is something such that it is a kind of a Llyr and it is a rectum.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the bed prizes Mennonite.; int2 & sent2 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | [
"sent3 -> int1: (Ex): ({A}x & {B}x); int1 & sent1 -> int2: {C}{a}; int2 & sent2 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | [] | null | null | $hypothesis$ = the rumble favors. ; $context$ = sent1: if there exists something such that it is a Llyr that is a rectum that the bed does prize Mennonite is not false. sent2: that the rumble is a favor is correct if the bed prizes Mennonite. sent3: the camisole is a Llyr and it is a rectum. ; $proof$ = | sent3 -> int1: there is something such that it is a kind of a Llyr and it is a rectum.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the bed prizes Mennonite.; int2 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ | DeductionInstance | the camisole is a Llyr and it is a rectum. | [
"if there exists something such that it is a Llyr that is a rectum that the bed does prize Mennonite is not false.",
"that the rumble is a favor is correct if the bed prizes Mennonite."
] | [
"The camisole is a rectum.",
"There is a rectum and a Llyr in the camisole."
] |
that the retiring does not occur is not incorrect. | sent1: the fact that the papillariness does not occur and the prepayment does not occur does not hold. sent2: that the gang happens prevents that the colonoscopy happens. sent3: the fact that that the non-inelasticness and the malignness happens is caused by the colonoscopy hold. sent4: the commingling Irelander does not occur and the custom does not occur if the unactableness occurs. sent5: if the prefiguring spider occurs that not the costing but the orientation happens is incorrect. sent6: the fact that the fragmentation does not occur and the unactableness does not occur is not true if the retiring occurs. sent7: the lesson does not occur and the killing does not occur. sent8: the abdication does not occur. sent9: that the Andalusianness does not occur is prevented by the papillariness. sent10: that the papillariness happens and the prepayment does not occur is incorrect. sent11: if the inelasticness does not occur then the abdication does not occur. sent12: the fact that the prizing buffalofish occurs is correct. sent13: either the resiling or the ganging or both happens if the orientation does not occur. sent14: if the colonoscopy does not occur that the inelasticness and the malignness happens does not hold. sent15: if the fact that not the costing but the orientation occurs is not true then the orientation does not occur. sent16: if that the papillariness does not occur and the prepayment does not occur is not right then the Andalusianness happens. sent17: if the Andalusianness occurs the abdication does not occur. sent18: the abdication does not occur if that the inelasticness and the malignness occurs is not true. | ¬{A} | sent1: ¬(¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) sent2: {G} -> ¬{F} sent3: {F} -> (¬{D} & {E}) sent4: {GD} -> (¬{JF} & ¬{DM}) sent5: {J} -> ¬(¬{K} & {I}) sent6: {A} -> ¬(¬{EO} & ¬{GD}) sent7: (¬{BE} & ¬{U}) sent8: ¬{C} sent9: {AA} -> {B} sent10: ¬({AA} & ¬{AB}) sent11: ¬{D} -> ¬{C} sent12: {DE} sent13: ¬{I} -> ({H} v {G}) sent14: ¬{F} -> ¬({D} & {E}) sent15: ¬(¬{K} & {I}) -> ¬{I} sent16: ¬(¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) -> {B} sent17: {B} -> ¬{C} sent18: ¬({D} & {E}) -> ¬{C} | [
"sent16 & sent1 -> int1: the Andalusianness happens.;"
] | UNKNOWN | [
"sent16 & sent1 -> int1: {B};"
] | UNKNOWN | 3 | null | 16 | 0 | 16 | the fact that the fragmentation does not occur and the unactableness does not occur does not hold. | ¬(¬{EO} & ¬{GD}) | 11 | [] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = that the retiring does not occur is not incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the papillariness does not occur and the prepayment does not occur does not hold. sent2: that the gang happens prevents that the colonoscopy happens. sent3: the fact that that the non-inelasticness and the malignness happens is caused by the colonoscopy hold. sent4: the commingling Irelander does not occur and the custom does not occur if the unactableness occurs. sent5: if the prefiguring spider occurs that not the costing but the orientation happens is incorrect. sent6: the fact that the fragmentation does not occur and the unactableness does not occur is not true if the retiring occurs. sent7: the lesson does not occur and the killing does not occur. sent8: the abdication does not occur. sent9: that the Andalusianness does not occur is prevented by the papillariness. sent10: that the papillariness happens and the prepayment does not occur is incorrect. sent11: if the inelasticness does not occur then the abdication does not occur. sent12: the fact that the prizing buffalofish occurs is correct. sent13: either the resiling or the ganging or both happens if the orientation does not occur. sent14: if the colonoscopy does not occur that the inelasticness and the malignness happens does not hold. sent15: if the fact that not the costing but the orientation occurs is not true then the orientation does not occur. sent16: if that the papillariness does not occur and the prepayment does not occur is not right then the Andalusianness happens. sent17: if the Andalusianness occurs the abdication does not occur. sent18: the abdication does not occur if that the inelasticness and the malignness occurs is not true. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ | DeductionInstance | if that the papillariness does not occur and the prepayment does not occur is not right then the Andalusianness happens. | [
"the fact that the papillariness does not occur and the prepayment does not occur does not hold."
] | [
"if that the papillariness does not occur and the prepayment does not occur is not right then the Andalusianness happens."
] |
that that the trapezoid is not an absolute but it is a Europe is wrong is true. | sent1: the trapezoid does prefigure 120. sent2: if the plaice does not fumble that it does prefigure 120 and it does prefigure fourth does not hold. sent3: the trapezoid is a kind of a Europe and does prefigure 120. sent4: the trapezoid is not an absolute if there exists something such that it prizes Gould. sent5: there exists something such that it does prize Gould. | ¬(¬{B}{a} & {C}{a}) | sent1: {D}{a} sent2: ¬{F}{c} -> ¬({D}{c} & {E}{c}) sent3: ({C}{a} & {D}{a}) sent4: (x): {A}x -> ¬{B}{a} sent5: (Ex): {A}x | [
"sent5 & sent4 -> int1: the fact that the trapezoid is not absolute is right.; sent3 -> int2: the trapezoid is a kind of a Europe.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | [
"sent5 & sent4 -> int1: ¬{B}{a}; sent3 -> int2: {C}{a}; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | the fact that the trapezoid is not an absolute but it is a Europe is not right. | ¬(¬{B}{a} & {C}{a}) | 6 | [] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = that that the trapezoid is not an absolute but it is a Europe is wrong is true. ; $context$ = sent1: the trapezoid does prefigure 120. sent2: if the plaice does not fumble that it does prefigure 120 and it does prefigure fourth does not hold. sent3: the trapezoid is a kind of a Europe and does prefigure 120. sent4: the trapezoid is not an absolute if there exists something such that it prizes Gould. sent5: there exists something such that it does prize Gould. ; $proof$ = | sent5 & sent4 -> int1: the fact that the trapezoid is not absolute is right.; sent3 -> int2: the trapezoid is a kind of a Europe.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ | DeductionInstance | there exists something such that it does prize Gould. | [
"the trapezoid is not an absolute if there exists something such that it prizes Gould.",
"the trapezoid is a kind of a Europe and does prefigure 120."
] | [
"Gould does get something such that it does prize SALVAGEDATA SALVAGEDATA SALVAGEDATA SALVAGEDATA SALVAGEDATA SALVAGEDATA SALVAGEDATA SALVAGEDATA SALVAGEDATA $75 SALVAGEDATA SALVAGEDATA SALVAGEDATA SALVAGEDATA SALVAGEDATA SALVAGEDATA SALVAGEDATA SALVAGEDATA SALVAGEDATA SALVAGEDATA SALVAGEDATA SALVAGEDATA SALVAGEDATA SALVAGEDATA SALVAGEDATA SALVAGEDATA SALVAGEDATA SALVAGEDATA SALVAGEDATA SALVAGEDATA SALVAGEDATA SALVAGEDATA SALVAGEDATA SALVAGEDATA SALVAGEDATA SALVAGEDATA SALVAGEDATA SALVAGEDATA SALVAGEDATA SALVAGEDATA SALVAGEDATA SALVAGEDATA SALVAGEDATA SALVAGEDATA SALVAGEDATA SALVAGEDATA SALVAGEDATA SALVAGEDATA SALVAGEDATA",
"Gould does get something such that it does prize SALVAGEDATA SALVAGEDATA SALVAGEDATA SALVAGEDATA SALVAGEDATA SALVAGEDATA SALVAGEDATA SALVAGEDATA SALVAGEDATA Friendly SALVAGEDATA SALVAGEDATA SALVAGEDATA SALVAGEDATA SALVAGEDATA SALVAGEDATA SALVAGEDATA SALVAGEDATA SALVAGEDATA SALVAGEDATA SALVAGEDATA SALVAGEDATA SALVAGEDATA SALVAGEDATA SALVAGEDATA SALVAGEDATA SALVAGEDATA SALVAGEDATA SALVAGEDATA SALVAGEDATA SALVAGEDATA SALVAGEDATA SALVAGEDATA SALVAGEDATA SALVAGEDATA SALVAGEDATA SALVAGEDATA SALVAGEDATA SALVAGEDATA SALVAGEDATA SALVAGEDATA SALVAGEDATA SALVAGEDATA SALVAGEDATA SALVAGEDATA SALVAGEDATA SALVAGEDATA SALVAGEDATA SALVAGEDATA"
] |
both the non-archivalness and the non-articularness occurs. | sent1: that the commingling skin-diver occurs but the prefiguring drunk does not occur is not true. sent2: the fact that the crime does not occur hold. sent3: that the archivalness happens is prevented by that either the incongruousness does not occur or the whimper does not occur or both. sent4: that both the non-archivalness and the non-articularness happens does not hold if the fact that the crime occurs is correct. sent5: both the prizing ornamental and the memberlessness occurs if the phytotherapy does not occur. sent6: either the commingling ECC or the chlorophylloseness or both happens. sent7: that the non-archivalness and the non-articularness happens is brought about by that the deflection does not occur. sent8: if that the prefiguring drunk does not occur hold then the commingling skin-diver does not occur. sent9: if the deathblow happens that the non-expedientness and the phytotherapy happens does not hold. sent10: not the whimper but the incongruousness occurs if the laryngospasm does not occur. sent11: if that the expedientness does not occur and the phytotherapy happens is false then the phytotherapy does not occur. sent12: that the deflection does not occur prevents the archivalness. sent13: both the laryngospasm and the informativeness occurs if the commingling skin-diver does not occur. sent14: the laryngospasm triggers that the incongruousness does not occur or the whimper does not occur or both. sent15: that the crime does not occur causes that the commingling ECC does not occur or the chlorophylloseness or both. sent16: the prefiguring drunk does not occur and the trihydroxiness does not occur if the prizing ornamental occurs. sent17: the archivalness does not occur. sent18: if the commingling skin-diver does not occur the informativeness but not the laryngospasm occurs. sent19: the crime and the deflection happens if that the whimper does not occur is correct. | (¬{D} & ¬{C}) | sent1: ¬({I} & ¬{J}) sent2: ¬{A} sent3: (¬{F} v ¬{E}) -> ¬{D} sent4: {A} -> ¬(¬{D} & ¬{C}) sent5: ¬{N} -> ({L} & {M}) sent6: ({AA} v {AB}) sent7: ¬{B} -> (¬{D} & ¬{C}) sent8: ¬{J} -> ¬{I} sent9: {P} -> ¬(¬{O} & {N}) sent10: ¬{G} -> (¬{E} & {F}) sent11: ¬(¬{O} & {N}) -> ¬{N} sent12: ¬{B} -> ¬{D} sent13: ¬{I} -> ({G} & {H}) sent14: {G} -> (¬{F} v ¬{E}) sent15: ¬{A} -> (¬{AA} v {AB}) sent16: {L} -> (¬{J} & ¬{K}) sent17: ¬{D} sent18: ¬{I} -> ({H} & ¬{G}) sent19: ¬{E} -> ({A} & {B}) | [
"sent15 & sent2 -> int1: the commingling ECC does not occur and/or the chlorophylloseness happens.;"
] | UNKNOWN | [
"sent15 & sent2 -> int1: (¬{AA} v {AB});"
] | UNKNOWN | 3 | null | 16 | 0 | 16 | that the non-archivalness and the non-articularness happens is wrong. | ¬(¬{D} & ¬{C}) | 14 | [] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = both the non-archivalness and the non-articularness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: that the commingling skin-diver occurs but the prefiguring drunk does not occur is not true. sent2: the fact that the crime does not occur hold. sent3: that the archivalness happens is prevented by that either the incongruousness does not occur or the whimper does not occur or both. sent4: that both the non-archivalness and the non-articularness happens does not hold if the fact that the crime occurs is correct. sent5: both the prizing ornamental and the memberlessness occurs if the phytotherapy does not occur. sent6: either the commingling ECC or the chlorophylloseness or both happens. sent7: that the non-archivalness and the non-articularness happens is brought about by that the deflection does not occur. sent8: if that the prefiguring drunk does not occur hold then the commingling skin-diver does not occur. sent9: if the deathblow happens that the non-expedientness and the phytotherapy happens does not hold. sent10: not the whimper but the incongruousness occurs if the laryngospasm does not occur. sent11: if that the expedientness does not occur and the phytotherapy happens is false then the phytotherapy does not occur. sent12: that the deflection does not occur prevents the archivalness. sent13: both the laryngospasm and the informativeness occurs if the commingling skin-diver does not occur. sent14: the laryngospasm triggers that the incongruousness does not occur or the whimper does not occur or both. sent15: that the crime does not occur causes that the commingling ECC does not occur or the chlorophylloseness or both. sent16: the prefiguring drunk does not occur and the trihydroxiness does not occur if the prizing ornamental occurs. sent17: the archivalness does not occur. sent18: if the commingling skin-diver does not occur the informativeness but not the laryngospasm occurs. sent19: the crime and the deflection happens if that the whimper does not occur is correct. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ | DeductionInstance | that the crime does not occur causes that the commingling ECC does not occur or the chlorophylloseness or both. | [
"the fact that the crime does not occur hold."
] | [
"that the crime does not occur causes that the commingling ECC does not occur or the chlorophylloseness or both."
] |
the rainstorm is a IPV. | sent1: there exists something such that that it is inconsiderate thing that prefigures stooper is incorrect. sent2: the scaffolding is a kind of a IPV if there is something such that the fact that it does fraternize and it is not procedural is incorrect. sent3: the fact that the comedian fraternizes and is not procedural does not hold. sent4: the wineskin is boreal. sent5: the fact that the scaffolding is a kind of considerate thing that prefigures stooper does not hold if it is a Passover. sent6: the scaffolding is a Passover. | {B}{b} | sent1: (Ex): ¬({AA}x & {AB}x) sent2: (x): ¬({E}x & ¬{F}x) -> {B}{a} sent3: ¬({E}{d} & ¬{F}{d}) sent4: {C}{c} sent5: {A}{a} -> ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) sent6: {A}{a} | [
"sent5 & sent6 -> int1: that the scaffolding is a kind of considerate thing that prefigures stooper is not true.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that that it is a kind of non-inconsiderate thing that prefigures stooper is incorrect.;"
] | UNKNOWN | [
"sent5 & sent6 -> int1: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}); int1 -> int2: (Ex): ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x);"
] | UNKNOWN | 3 | null | 4 | 0 | 4 | the rainstorm does prefigure stooper. | {AB}{b} | 6 | [
"sent3 -> int3: that there exists something such that that it does fraternize and it is not procedural is not true is not false.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the scaffolding is a kind of a IPV.; sent4 -> int5: the wineskin does not apprehend and/or it is boreal.; int5 -> int6: something does not apprehend and/or is boreal.;"
] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the rainstorm is a IPV. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that that it is inconsiderate thing that prefigures stooper is incorrect. sent2: the scaffolding is a kind of a IPV if there is something such that the fact that it does fraternize and it is not procedural is incorrect. sent3: the fact that the comedian fraternizes and is not procedural does not hold. sent4: the wineskin is boreal. sent5: the fact that the scaffolding is a kind of considerate thing that prefigures stooper does not hold if it is a Passover. sent6: the scaffolding is a Passover. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ | DeductionInstance | the fact that the scaffolding is a kind of considerate thing that prefigures stooper does not hold if it is a Passover. | [
"the scaffolding is a Passover."
] | [
"the fact that the scaffolding is a kind of considerate thing that prefigures stooper does not hold if it is a Passover."
] |
the multilingualness does not occur. | sent1: the disembarking occurs. sent2: the oceanicness does not occur but the dash occurs if the commingling oblique does not occur. sent3: if the middle-classness happens that the prefiguring echinus does not occur but the commingling somewhere occurs is not true. sent4: the unseamanlikeness occurs. sent5: if the additive occurs the fact that the multilingualness occurs is not wrong. sent6: the biocatalyticness occurs. sent7: if the biocatalyticness happens the additiveness happens. sent8: if the agape happens the practicalness happens. sent9: that the do-si-do happens yields that the remuneration occurs. sent10: the commingling roping does not occur and the nonvolatileness does not occur if the arenicolousness does not occur. sent11: the fact that if the biocatalyticness does not occur then the fact that the additiveness happens and the multilingualness happens is not correct is true. sent12: if the picture does not occur then the biocatalyticness does not occur. sent13: that the chromatographicness occurs and the middle-classness happens is caused by the non-oceanicness. sent14: the emotionalness occurs. sent15: the pneumonicness does not occur and the commingling oblique does not occur if the nautch does not occur. sent16: the multilingualness does not occur if that the additive occurs and the multilingualness occurs is incorrect. sent17: that the nautch does not occur is caused by that the commingling roping does not occur. sent18: if that the fact that the prefiguring echinus does not occur and the commingling somewhere happens hold does not hold the picture does not occur. | ¬{C} | sent1: {AL} sent2: ¬{K} -> (¬{I} & {J}) sent3: {G} -> ¬(¬{F} & {E}) sent4: {EU} sent5: {B} -> {C} sent6: {A} sent7: {A} -> {B} sent8: {HL} -> {FO} sent9: {EL} -> {GK} sent10: ¬{P} -> (¬{N} & ¬{O}) sent11: ¬{A} -> ¬({B} & {C}) sent12: ¬{D} -> ¬{A} sent13: ¬{I} -> ({H} & {G}) sent14: {GQ} sent15: ¬{M} -> (¬{L} & ¬{K}) sent16: ¬({B} & {C}) -> ¬{C} sent17: ¬{N} -> ¬{M} sent18: ¬(¬{F} & {E}) -> ¬{D} | [
"sent7 & sent6 -> int1: the additive occurs.; sent5 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | [
"sent7 & sent6 -> int1: {B}; sent5 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | 2 | 2 | 15 | 0 | 15 | the multilingualness does not occur. | ¬{C} | 15 | [] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the multilingualness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the disembarking occurs. sent2: the oceanicness does not occur but the dash occurs if the commingling oblique does not occur. sent3: if the middle-classness happens that the prefiguring echinus does not occur but the commingling somewhere occurs is not true. sent4: the unseamanlikeness occurs. sent5: if the additive occurs the fact that the multilingualness occurs is not wrong. sent6: the biocatalyticness occurs. sent7: if the biocatalyticness happens the additiveness happens. sent8: if the agape happens the practicalness happens. sent9: that the do-si-do happens yields that the remuneration occurs. sent10: the commingling roping does not occur and the nonvolatileness does not occur if the arenicolousness does not occur. sent11: the fact that if the biocatalyticness does not occur then the fact that the additiveness happens and the multilingualness happens is not correct is true. sent12: if the picture does not occur then the biocatalyticness does not occur. sent13: that the chromatographicness occurs and the middle-classness happens is caused by the non-oceanicness. sent14: the emotionalness occurs. sent15: the pneumonicness does not occur and the commingling oblique does not occur if the nautch does not occur. sent16: the multilingualness does not occur if that the additive occurs and the multilingualness occurs is incorrect. sent17: that the nautch does not occur is caused by that the commingling roping does not occur. sent18: if that the fact that the prefiguring echinus does not occur and the commingling somewhere happens hold does not hold the picture does not occur. ; $proof$ = | sent7 & sent6 -> int1: the additive occurs.; sent5 & int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ | DeductionInstance | if the biocatalyticness happens the additiveness happens. | [
"the biocatalyticness occurs.",
"if the additive occurs the fact that the multilingualness occurs is not wrong."
] | [
"If the biocatalyticness happens.",
"The biocatalyticness will happen if it happens."
] |
the fact that the prizing bit does not occur is true. | sent1: the interlocutoriness does not occur. sent2: the anemographicness does not occur. sent3: both the prizing bit and the non-anemographicness occurs if the interlocutoriness occurs. | ¬{B} | sent1: ¬{C} sent2: ¬{A} sent3: {C} -> ({B} & ¬{A}) | [
"void -> assump1: Let's assume that the prizing bit happens.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: not the anemographicness but the prizing bit happens.;"
] | UNKNOWN | [
"void -> assump1: {B}; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: (¬{A} & {B});"
] | UNKNOWN | 3 | null | 1 | 0 | 1 | that the prizing bit occurs is true. | {B} | 6 | [] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the fact that the prizing bit does not occur is true. ; $context$ = sent1: the interlocutoriness does not occur. sent2: the anemographicness does not occur. sent3: both the prizing bit and the non-anemographicness occurs if the interlocutoriness occurs. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ | DeductionInstance | the anemographicness does not occur. | [] | [
"the anemographicness does not occur."
] |
the khesari is not a front-runner. | sent1: the fact that something is a Laney but it does not commingle half-century is false if it is a kind of a wait. sent2: if a petrolatum does prefigure dialect it is not a front-runner. sent3: everything is a wait. sent4: if the begonia is not anaphoric then the khesari does prefigure dialect. sent5: the khesari is a kind of a front-runner and it is anaphoric if there is something such that it is not a kind of a greaves. sent6: the khesari prefigures dialect. sent7: the khesari is a petrolatum that prefigures dialect if the begonia is not anaphoric. sent8: the begonia is not a front-runner. sent9: the fact that the begonia is not anaphoric is not false. sent10: if the begonia is anaphoric thing that prefigures dialect then it is not a petrolatum. | ¬{B}{b} | sent1: (x): {F}x -> ¬({D}x & ¬{E}x) sent2: (x): ({AA}x & {AB}x) -> ¬{B}x sent3: (x): {F}x sent4: ¬{A}{a} -> {AB}{b} sent5: (x): ¬{C}x -> ({B}{b} & {A}{b}) sent6: {AB}{b} sent7: ¬{A}{a} -> ({AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) sent8: ¬{B}{a} sent9: ¬{A}{a} sent10: ({A}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> ¬{AA}{a} | [
"sent7 & sent9 -> int1: the khesari is a petrolatum and it does prefigure dialect.; sent2 -> int2: if the khesari is a petrolatum and it prefigures dialect it is not a front-runner.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | [
"sent7 & sent9 -> int1: ({AA}{b} & {AB}{b}); sent2 -> int2: ({AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) -> ¬{B}{b}; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | 2 | 2 | 7 | 0 | 7 | the khesari is a kind of a front-runner. | {B}{b} | 8 | [
"sent3 -> int3: the sheepskin is a wait.; sent1 -> int4: that the sheepskin is a kind of a Laney but it does not commingle half-century is not correct if it waits.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the sheepskin is a kind of a Laney but it does not commingle half-century does not hold.; int5 -> int6: there exists nothing such that it is a Laney and it does not commingle half-century.; int6 -> int7: that the begonia is a Laney but it does not commingle half-century is wrong.;"
] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the khesari is not a front-runner. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that something is a Laney but it does not commingle half-century is false if it is a kind of a wait. sent2: if a petrolatum does prefigure dialect it is not a front-runner. sent3: everything is a wait. sent4: if the begonia is not anaphoric then the khesari does prefigure dialect. sent5: the khesari is a kind of a front-runner and it is anaphoric if there is something such that it is not a kind of a greaves. sent6: the khesari prefigures dialect. sent7: the khesari is a petrolatum that prefigures dialect if the begonia is not anaphoric. sent8: the begonia is not a front-runner. sent9: the fact that the begonia is not anaphoric is not false. sent10: if the begonia is anaphoric thing that prefigures dialect then it is not a petrolatum. ; $proof$ = | sent7 & sent9 -> int1: the khesari is a petrolatum and it does prefigure dialect.; sent2 -> int2: if the khesari is a petrolatum and it prefigures dialect it is not a front-runner.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ | DeductionInstance | the khesari is a petrolatum that prefigures dialect if the begonia is not anaphoric. | [
"the fact that the begonia is not anaphoric is not false.",
"if a petrolatum does prefigure dialect it is not a front-runner."
] | [
"The begonia is a petrolatum that prefigures dialect if it is not anaphoric.",
"The begonia is a petrolatum that prefigures dialect if it isn't anaphoric."
] |
that there is something such that if it is not tinny that it circularizes and is albitic does not hold does not hold. | sent1: if the supremo is not tinny then the fact that it circularizes and is albitic does not hold. sent2: there is something such that if it is tinny then that the fact that it does circularize and it is albitic is not incorrect is false. sent3: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not a finalist hold that it is later and it is a Panofsky does not hold. sent4: if the xenotime does not prize Citroncirus then that it is tinny and a ruby does not hold. sent5: the fact that something is both a footwork and Hispanic is not true if it is not a cork. sent6: there exists something such that if it is not cardiologic then the fact that it prizes aftereffect and it is a Tarkovsky is not true. | ¬((Ex): ¬{A}x -> ¬({AA}x & {AB}x)) | sent1: ¬{A}{aa} -> ¬({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) sent2: (Ex): {A}x -> ¬({AA}x & {AB}x) sent3: (Ex): ¬{HI}x -> ¬({IA}x & {HH}x) sent4: ¬{FT}{hd} -> ¬({A}{hd} & {DQ}{hd}) sent5: (x): ¬{JA}x -> ¬({HA}x & {CH}x) sent6: (Ex): ¬{AP}x -> ¬({FA}x & {IJ}x) | [
"sent1 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | [
"sent1 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | 1 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 5 | there is something such that if that it does not cork is not incorrect then the fact that it is a kind of a footwork and it is a Hispanic does not hold. | (Ex): ¬{JA}x -> ¬({HA}x & {CH}x) | 2 | [
"sent5 -> int1: the fact that the Lota is a footwork and it is a Hispanic does not hold if it is not a cork.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | PROVED | $hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if it is not tinny that it circularizes and is albitic does not hold does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the supremo is not tinny then the fact that it circularizes and is albitic does not hold. sent2: there is something such that if it is tinny then that the fact that it does circularize and it is albitic is not incorrect is false. sent3: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not a finalist hold that it is later and it is a Panofsky does not hold. sent4: if the xenotime does not prize Citroncirus then that it is tinny and a ruby does not hold. sent5: the fact that something is both a footwork and Hispanic is not true if it is not a cork. sent6: there exists something such that if it is not cardiologic then the fact that it prizes aftereffect and it is a Tarkovsky is not true. ; $proof$ = | sent1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ | DeductionInstance | if the supremo is not tinny then the fact that it circularizes and is albitic does not hold. | [] | [
"if the supremo is not tinny then the fact that it circularizes and is albitic does not hold."
] |
the take-up prizes feminism and it does force solicitation. | sent1: if the take-up is not amblyopic or it does force solicitation or both then it is anadromous. sent2: something is anadromous but it does not prize senate if it is not epenthetic. sent3: the take-up is a vigilante. sent4: the take-up does force solicitation if the metabolite is amblyopic. sent5: the metabolite does not prize feminism and it is not amblyopic if the Apache is not anadromous. sent6: the metabolite is amblyopic and it is anadromous. sent7: if the hillbilly is not a gastroenterology or is a hulking or both then it forces solicitation. sent8: everything is not epenthetic. sent9: the take-up does not prize secondo and/or it is not drinkable. sent10: something prizes feminism if it does not prize secondo or it is undrinkable or both. | ({B}{aa} & {A}{aa}) | sent1: (¬{C}{aa} v {A}{aa}) -> {D}{aa} sent2: (x): ¬{F}x -> ({D}x & ¬{E}x) sent3: {CG}{aa} sent4: {C}{a} -> {A}{aa} sent5: ¬{D}{b} -> (¬{B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) sent6: ({C}{a} & {D}{a}) sent7: (¬{HN}{hd} v {JE}{hd}) -> {A}{hd} sent8: (x): ¬{F}x sent9: (¬{AA}{aa} v {AB}{aa}) sent10: (x): (¬{AA}x v {AB}x) -> {B}x | [
"sent10 -> int1: if the take-up does not prize secondo and/or is undrinkable then it does prize feminism.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the take-up does prize feminism.; sent6 -> int3: the metabolite is amblyopic.; sent4 & int3 -> int4: the take-up does force solicitation.; int2 & int4 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | [
"sent10 -> int1: (¬{AA}{aa} v {AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa}; int1 & sent9 -> int2: {B}{aa}; sent6 -> int3: {C}{a}; sent4 & int3 -> int4: {A}{aa}; int2 & int4 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | 3 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 6 | that the take-up prizes feminism and it does force solicitation is incorrect. | ¬({B}{aa} & {A}{aa}) | 7 | [
"sent8 -> int5: the fact that the defloration is non-epenthetic is not false.; sent2 -> int6: the defloration is anadromous and does not prize senate if it is not epenthetic.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the defloration is anadromous but it does not prize senate.; int7 -> int8: everything is anadromous and does not prize senate.; int8 -> int9: the Apache is anadromous and does not prize senate.; int9 -> int10: there is something such that it is not non-anadromous and it does not prize senate.;"
] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the take-up prizes feminism and it does force solicitation. ; $context$ = sent1: if the take-up is not amblyopic or it does force solicitation or both then it is anadromous. sent2: something is anadromous but it does not prize senate if it is not epenthetic. sent3: the take-up is a vigilante. sent4: the take-up does force solicitation if the metabolite is amblyopic. sent5: the metabolite does not prize feminism and it is not amblyopic if the Apache is not anadromous. sent6: the metabolite is amblyopic and it is anadromous. sent7: if the hillbilly is not a gastroenterology or is a hulking or both then it forces solicitation. sent8: everything is not epenthetic. sent9: the take-up does not prize secondo and/or it is not drinkable. sent10: something prizes feminism if it does not prize secondo or it is undrinkable or both. ; $proof$ = | sent10 -> int1: if the take-up does not prize secondo and/or is undrinkable then it does prize feminism.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the take-up does prize feminism.; sent6 -> int3: the metabolite is amblyopic.; sent4 & int3 -> int4: the take-up does force solicitation.; int2 & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ | DeductionInstance | something prizes feminism if it does not prize secondo or it is undrinkable or both. | [
"the take-up does not prize secondo and/or it is not drinkable.",
"the metabolite is amblyopic and it is anadromous.",
"the take-up does force solicitation if the metabolite is amblyopic."
] | [
"Feminism is won if it does not prize secondo or both.",
"Feminism isprized if it does not prize secondo or both.",
"Feminism is celebrated if it does not prize secondo or both."
] |
the corundom is either non-aphaeretic or a coalpit or both. | sent1: the dicamptodon is a kind of a ascolichen and/or it is calorimetric. sent2: the fact that either the panpipe does not prize caffeinism or it is a cleaver or both is wrong if that there exists something such that it is a ascolichen is not wrong. sent3: the fact that the corundom is not aphaeretic and/or is a kind of a coalpit is false if the vector does not untie. sent4: everything nosedives. sent5: that the dicamptodon does not untie and/or is calorimetric is wrong. sent6: the corundom is not a kind of a coalpit. sent7: the vector does not untie if there exists something such that either it is a ascolichen or it is calorimetric or both. sent8: the ceibo is not calorimetric if it does not untie and does shore. sent9: that that the corundom unties but it is not calorimetric does not hold is not wrong if it is a coalpit. sent10: the vector does not untie if something is calorimetric. sent11: if the fact that something does nosedive is not incorrect then it commingles ungulate and it is not a impracticability. sent12: the fact that something is aphaeretic but it is not secretarial does not hold if it is not a kind of a impracticability. sent13: the corundom is not a coalpit if the vector does not untie. sent14: if there exists something such that it is not calorimetric then the fact that the fomentation is a kind of a ascolichen and is calorimetric is false. sent15: that if there is something such that the fact that it does untie and is not calorimetric does not hold then the vector is a ascolichen hold. sent16: if either the contrabassoon is not a coalpit or it does not shore or both the corundom is a coalpit. sent17: that the contrabassoon is not a ascolichen is correct if the fact that the fomentation is both a ascolichen and calorimetric does not hold. | (¬{E}{b} v {D}{b}) | sent1: ({A}{aa} v {B}{aa}) sent2: (x): {A}x -> ¬(¬{JH}{ei} v {GI}{ei}) sent3: ¬{C}{a} -> ¬(¬{E}{b} v {D}{b}) sent4: (x): {J}x sent5: ¬(¬{C}{aa} v {B}{aa}) sent6: ¬{D}{b} sent7: (x): ({A}x v {B}x) -> ¬{C}{a} sent8: (¬{C}{e} & {F}{e}) -> ¬{B}{e} sent9: {D}{b} -> ¬({C}{b} & ¬{B}{b}) sent10: (x): {B}x -> ¬{C}{a} sent11: (x): {J}x -> ({I}x & ¬{H}x) sent12: (x): ¬{H}x -> ¬({E}x & ¬{G}x) sent13: ¬{C}{a} -> ¬{D}{b} sent14: (x): ¬{B}x -> ¬({A}{d} & {B}{d}) sent15: (x): ¬({C}x & ¬{B}x) -> {A}{a} sent16: (¬{D}{c} v ¬{F}{c}) -> {D}{b} sent17: ¬({A}{d} & {B}{d}) -> ¬{A}{c} | [
"sent1 -> int1: there is something such that it is a ascolichen and/or calorimetric.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the vector does not untie.; sent3 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | [
"sent1 -> int1: (Ex): ({A}x v {B}x); int1 & sent7 -> int2: ¬{C}{a}; sent3 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | 3 | 3 | 14 | 0 | 14 | that the panpipe does not prize caffeinism and/or it is a cleaver does not hold. | ¬(¬{JH}{ei} v {GI}{ei}) | 16 | [
"sent12 -> int3: that the fomentation is aphaeretic but it is not secretarial is not true if it is not a impracticability.; sent11 -> int4: the sapphirine commingles ungulate and is not a impracticability if it is a nosedive.; sent4 -> int5: the sapphirine nosedives.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the sapphirine does commingle ungulate and is not a impracticability.; int6 -> int7: everything does commingle ungulate and is not a impracticability.; int7 -> int8: the ceibo commingles ungulate but it is not a kind of a impracticability.; int8 -> int9: the ceibo is not a impracticability.; int9 -> int10: everything is not a impracticability.; int10 -> int11: the fomentation is not a impracticability.; int3 & int11 -> int12: that the fomentation is not non-aphaeretic and not secretarial is not right.;"
] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the corundom is either non-aphaeretic or a coalpit or both. ; $context$ = sent1: the dicamptodon is a kind of a ascolichen and/or it is calorimetric. sent2: the fact that either the panpipe does not prize caffeinism or it is a cleaver or both is wrong if that there exists something such that it is a ascolichen is not wrong. sent3: the fact that the corundom is not aphaeretic and/or is a kind of a coalpit is false if the vector does not untie. sent4: everything nosedives. sent5: that the dicamptodon does not untie and/or is calorimetric is wrong. sent6: the corundom is not a kind of a coalpit. sent7: the vector does not untie if there exists something such that either it is a ascolichen or it is calorimetric or both. sent8: the ceibo is not calorimetric if it does not untie and does shore. sent9: that that the corundom unties but it is not calorimetric does not hold is not wrong if it is a coalpit. sent10: the vector does not untie if something is calorimetric. sent11: if the fact that something does nosedive is not incorrect then it commingles ungulate and it is not a impracticability. sent12: the fact that something is aphaeretic but it is not secretarial does not hold if it is not a kind of a impracticability. sent13: the corundom is not a coalpit if the vector does not untie. sent14: if there exists something such that it is not calorimetric then the fact that the fomentation is a kind of a ascolichen and is calorimetric is false. sent15: that if there is something such that the fact that it does untie and is not calorimetric does not hold then the vector is a ascolichen hold. sent16: if either the contrabassoon is not a coalpit or it does not shore or both the corundom is a coalpit. sent17: that the contrabassoon is not a ascolichen is correct if the fact that the fomentation is both a ascolichen and calorimetric does not hold. ; $proof$ = | sent1 -> int1: there is something such that it is a ascolichen and/or calorimetric.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the vector does not untie.; sent3 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ | DeductionInstance | the dicamptodon is a kind of a ascolichen and/or it is calorimetric. | [
"the vector does not untie if there exists something such that either it is a ascolichen or it is calorimetric or both.",
"the fact that the corundom is not aphaeretic and/or is a kind of a coalpit is false if the vector does not untie."
] | [
"The dicamptodon is a type of calorimetric.",
"There is a possibility that the dicamptodon is calorimetric."
] |
the centerboard is nonsurgical and it is a cohune. | sent1: if that the teacup does not prefigure locking hold then the fact that the lynx does not commingle crier and does prize longwool does not hold. sent2: there exists something such that the fact that it is a aminomethane and it is not a kind of a third-rater is not true. sent3: if the fact that something does not prize pining and is not favorable does not hold then it does prize overlip. sent4: the containment window-shops if the stage is a relinquishment. sent5: there exists something such that the fact that it is a steenbok and is surgical is not correct. sent6: if the stage is a housemaster the containment window-shops. sent7: there is something such that that it is both a aminomethane and a third-rater is not right. sent8: something does not prize longwool if the fact that it does not commingle crier and prize longwool does not hold. sent9: that the delinquent does not prize pining and it is not favorable does not hold if that the lynx does not prize longwool is not wrong. sent10: the fact that something is not a spearmint and it is not a kind of a combo is incorrect if that it is a banzai hold. sent11: either the stage is a relinquishment or it is a housemaster or both. sent12: everything is a banzai. sent13: if there is something such that it is ovular the fact that the delinquent is a kind of a steenbok and is carcinomatous hold. sent14: the centerboard is a cohune and it is a steenbok. sent15: if there exists something such that that it is a cohune and it is not nonsurgical is not true then the centerboard is a steenbok. sent16: if there is something such that it is not nonsurgical the fact that the centerboard is nonsurgical and it is a cohune is not true. sent17: something is ovular if it does window-shop. sent18: if the fact that the totalitarian is not a spearmint and it is not a combo is wrong then the teacup does not prefigure locking. sent19: if there is something such that the fact that it is a aminomethane and it is not a third-rater is incorrect the centerboard is nonsurgical. | ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) | sent1: ¬{N}{g} -> ¬(¬{K}{d} & {G}{d}) sent2: (Ex): ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) sent3: (x): ¬(¬{E}x & ¬{F}x) -> {D}x sent4: {L}{f} -> {J}{e} sent5: (Ex): ¬({C}x & ¬{A}x) sent6: {M}{f} -> {J}{e} sent7: (Ex): ¬({AA}x & {AB}x) sent8: (x): ¬(¬{K}x & {G}x) -> ¬{G}x sent9: ¬{G}{d} -> ¬(¬{E}{c} & ¬{F}{c}) sent10: (x): {Q}x -> ¬(¬{O}x & ¬{P}x) sent11: ({L}{f} v {M}{f}) sent12: (x): {Q}x sent13: (x): {I}x -> ({C}{c} & {H}{c}) sent14: ({B}{a} & {C}{a}) sent15: (x): ¬({B}x & ¬{A}x) -> {C}{a} sent16: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬({A}{a} & {B}{a}) sent17: (x): {J}x -> {I}x sent18: ¬(¬{O}{h} & ¬{P}{h}) -> ¬{N}{g} sent19: (x): ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> {A}{a} | [
"sent2 & sent19 -> int1: that the centerboard is nonsurgical is right.; sent14 -> int2: the centerboard is a kind of a cohune.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | [
"sent2 & sent19 -> int1: {A}{a}; sent14 -> int2: {B}{a}; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | 2 | 2 | 16 | 0 | 16 | the fact that the centerboard is nonsurgical and it is a cohune does not hold. | ¬({A}{a} & {B}{a}) | 14 | [
"sent3 -> int3: if that the delinquent does not prize pining and it is not favorable is not true then it prizes overlip.; sent10 -> int4: if the overlip is a banzai then the fact that it is not a spearmint and not a combo is not right.; sent12 -> int5: the overlip is a banzai.; int4 & int5 -> int6: that the overlip is not a spearmint and not a combo is not correct.; int6 -> int7: there exists nothing that is not a kind of a spearmint and is not a kind of a combo.; int7 -> int8: the fact that the totalitarian is not a spearmint and not a combo is incorrect.; sent18 & int8 -> int9: the teacup does not prefigure locking.; sent1 & int9 -> int10: the fact that that the lynx does not commingle crier and prizes longwool is not wrong does not hold.; sent8 -> int11: the lynx does not prize longwool if that it does not commingle crier and it does prize longwool is not true.; int10 & int11 -> int12: the lynx does not prize longwool.; int12 & sent9 -> int13: the fact that the delinquent does not prize pining and it is not favorable is not correct.; int3 & int13 -> int14: the delinquent does prize overlip.; sent17 -> int15: if the containment does window-shop then it is ovular.; sent6 & sent11 & sent4 -> int16: the containment does window-shop.; int15 & int16 -> int17: the containment is ovular.; int17 -> int18: there exists something such that it is ovular.; sent13 & int18 -> int19: the delinquent is both a steenbok and carcinomatous.; int19 -> int20: the delinquent is a steenbok.; int14 & int20 -> int21: the delinquent is a steenbok and it prizes overlip.; int21 -> int22: there exists something such that it is a steenbok that prizes overlip.;"
] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the centerboard is nonsurgical and it is a cohune. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the teacup does not prefigure locking hold then the fact that the lynx does not commingle crier and does prize longwool does not hold. sent2: there exists something such that the fact that it is a aminomethane and it is not a kind of a third-rater is not true. sent3: if the fact that something does not prize pining and is not favorable does not hold then it does prize overlip. sent4: the containment window-shops if the stage is a relinquishment. sent5: there exists something such that the fact that it is a steenbok and is surgical is not correct. sent6: if the stage is a housemaster the containment window-shops. sent7: there is something such that that it is both a aminomethane and a third-rater is not right. sent8: something does not prize longwool if the fact that it does not commingle crier and prize longwool does not hold. sent9: that the delinquent does not prize pining and it is not favorable does not hold if that the lynx does not prize longwool is not wrong. sent10: the fact that something is not a spearmint and it is not a kind of a combo is incorrect if that it is a banzai hold. sent11: either the stage is a relinquishment or it is a housemaster or both. sent12: everything is a banzai. sent13: if there is something such that it is ovular the fact that the delinquent is a kind of a steenbok and is carcinomatous hold. sent14: the centerboard is a cohune and it is a steenbok. sent15: if there exists something such that that it is a cohune and it is not nonsurgical is not true then the centerboard is a steenbok. sent16: if there is something such that it is not nonsurgical the fact that the centerboard is nonsurgical and it is a cohune is not true. sent17: something is ovular if it does window-shop. sent18: if the fact that the totalitarian is not a spearmint and it is not a combo is wrong then the teacup does not prefigure locking. sent19: if there is something such that the fact that it is a aminomethane and it is not a third-rater is incorrect the centerboard is nonsurgical. ; $proof$ = | sent2 & sent19 -> int1: that the centerboard is nonsurgical is right.; sent14 -> int2: the centerboard is a kind of a cohune.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ | DeductionInstance | there exists something such that the fact that it is a aminomethane and it is not a kind of a third-rater is not true. | [
"if there is something such that the fact that it is a aminomethane and it is not a third-rater is incorrect the centerboard is nonsurgical.",
"the centerboard is a cohune and it is a steenbok."
] | [
"The fact that it is not a third-rater is not true.",
"It is not true that there is something like a third-rater in this case."
] |
the wristlet is not a cloaked. | sent1: the phagocyte prizes lupine. sent2: if the wristlet is a cloaked then it is not a kind of a liberator. sent3: the myxomycete is placable. sent4: the junkie is placable. sent5: something is both not an elbow and not a charlatanism if it is ratlike. sent6: if the vitality does prize lupine then the phagocyte is a cloaked. sent7: the wristlet is a suppressor. sent8: the wristlet is respectful. sent9: the Cognac does not prize lupine and is a charlatanism if it is a kind of an elbow. sent10: the wristlet is not a kind of a liberator. sent11: if the wristlet is a cloaked then it is not a kind of a liberator and is not placable. sent12: The lupine prizes phagocyte. sent13: if the phagocyte is a cloaked then the wristlet cloaked. sent14: the phagocyte is placable. sent15: the wristlet does not cloak and is not placable if it does prize lupine. | ¬{A}{a} | sent1: {B}{b} sent2: {A}{a} -> ¬{AA}{a} sent3: {AB}{fd} sent4: {AB}{ao} sent5: (x): {E}x -> (¬{D}x & ¬{C}x) sent6: {B}{c} -> {A}{b} sent7: {CT}{a} sent8: ¬{HH}{a} sent9: {D}{fj} -> (¬{B}{fj} & {C}{fj}) sent10: ¬{AA}{a} sent11: {A}{a} -> (¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) sent12: {AC}{aa} sent13: {A}{b} -> {A}{a} sent14: {AB}{b} sent15: {B}{a} -> (¬{A}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) | [
"void -> assump1: Let's assume that the wristlet cloaks.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the wristlet is not a kind of a liberator and it is not placable.; int1 -> int2: the wristlet is not placable.;"
] | UNKNOWN | [
"void -> assump1: {A}{a}; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: (¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}); int1 -> int2: ¬{AB}{a};"
] | UNKNOWN | 4 | null | 13 | 0 | 13 | that the wristlet does cloak is correct. | {A}{a} | 7 | [
"sent5 -> int3: the Davenport is not a kind of an elbow and it is not a kind of a charlatanism if it is ratlike.;"
] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the wristlet is not a cloaked. ; $context$ = sent1: the phagocyte prizes lupine. sent2: if the wristlet is a cloaked then it is not a kind of a liberator. sent3: the myxomycete is placable. sent4: the junkie is placable. sent5: something is both not an elbow and not a charlatanism if it is ratlike. sent6: if the vitality does prize lupine then the phagocyte is a cloaked. sent7: the wristlet is a suppressor. sent8: the wristlet is respectful. sent9: the Cognac does not prize lupine and is a charlatanism if it is a kind of an elbow. sent10: the wristlet is not a kind of a liberator. sent11: if the wristlet is a cloaked then it is not a kind of a liberator and is not placable. sent12: The lupine prizes phagocyte. sent13: if the phagocyte is a cloaked then the wristlet cloaked. sent14: the phagocyte is placable. sent15: the wristlet does not cloak and is not placable if it does prize lupine. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ | DeductionInstance | if the wristlet is a cloaked then it is not a kind of a liberator and is not placable. | [] | [
"if the wristlet is a cloaked then it is not a kind of a liberator and is not placable."
] |
the fact that there exists something such that if it is colorful then it is not a walkabout and it commingles Holothuridae is not true. | sent1: if the overlip is black-and-white it is both not nonsurgical and pineal. sent2: if something is squinty then it is non-rosaceous and does prize abulia. sent3: that there is something such that if it is parhelic it is a kind of non-auditory thing that is impressionistic hold. sent4: if the murderer is a colloquy then the fact that it is not a woodenware is correct. sent5: the overlip is not a kind of a walkabout but it does commingle Holothuridae if it is colorful. sent6: if the overlip is colorful then it is not a kind of a walkabout. sent7: that the overlip is not colorful but it prefigures locking is correct if it is a Aeolic. sent8: there exists something such that if it is colorful then it is not a kind of a walkabout. sent9: the overlip is not colorful if it is a kind of a radish. sent10: there is something such that if it is a self-esteem then it does not brake and it is a Purace. sent11: if the gallbladder does prefigure gallbladder then it is not unquiet and it is pineal. sent12: the fact that something does not prefigure confit but it does prefigure tangled is right if it is a kind of a deist. sent13: there is something such that if it is colorful then that it commingles Holothuridae is right. sent14: there exists something such that if it is colorful it is a walkabout that does commingle Holothuridae. | ¬((Ex): {A}x -> (¬{AA}x & {AB}x)) | sent1: {BS}{aa} -> (¬{BN}{aa} & {EI}{aa}) sent2: (x): {JJ}x -> (¬{GF}x & {ER}x) sent3: (Ex): {EA}x -> (¬{GJ}x & {DN}x) sent4: {R}{gj} -> ¬{ED}{gj} sent5: {A}{aa} -> (¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) sent6: {A}{aa} -> ¬{AA}{aa} sent7: {GS}{aa} -> (¬{A}{aa} & {JC}{aa}) sent8: (Ex): {A}x -> ¬{AA}x sent9: {ES}{aa} -> ¬{A}{aa} sent10: (Ex): {FQ}x -> (¬{DA}x & {FM}x) sent11: {BB}{an} -> (¬{DB}{an} & {EI}{an}) sent12: (x): {FP}x -> (¬{DL}x & {CM}x) sent13: (Ex): {A}x -> {AB}x sent14: (Ex): {A}x -> ({AA}x & {AB}x) | [
"sent5 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | [
"sent5 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | 1 | 1 | 13 | 0 | 13 | there is something such that if it is a deist it does not prefigure confit and it prefigures tangled. | (Ex): {FP}x -> (¬{DL}x & {CM}x) | 2 | [
"sent12 -> int1: the backboard does not prefigure confit and prefigures tangled if it is deist.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | PROVED | $hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if it is colorful then it is not a walkabout and it commingles Holothuridae is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: if the overlip is black-and-white it is both not nonsurgical and pineal. sent2: if something is squinty then it is non-rosaceous and does prize abulia. sent3: that there is something such that if it is parhelic it is a kind of non-auditory thing that is impressionistic hold. sent4: if the murderer is a colloquy then the fact that it is not a woodenware is correct. sent5: the overlip is not a kind of a walkabout but it does commingle Holothuridae if it is colorful. sent6: if the overlip is colorful then it is not a kind of a walkabout. sent7: that the overlip is not colorful but it prefigures locking is correct if it is a Aeolic. sent8: there exists something such that if it is colorful then it is not a kind of a walkabout. sent9: the overlip is not colorful if it is a kind of a radish. sent10: there is something such that if it is a self-esteem then it does not brake and it is a Purace. sent11: if the gallbladder does prefigure gallbladder then it is not unquiet and it is pineal. sent12: the fact that something does not prefigure confit but it does prefigure tangled is right if it is a kind of a deist. sent13: there is something such that if it is colorful then that it commingles Holothuridae is right. sent14: there exists something such that if it is colorful it is a walkabout that does commingle Holothuridae. ; $proof$ = | sent5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ | DeductionInstance | the overlip is not a kind of a walkabout but it does commingle Holothuridae if it is colorful. | [] | [
"the overlip is not a kind of a walkabout but it does commingle Holothuridae if it is colorful."
] |
there is something such that if that it is not a vagrancy but a inexpedience does not hold then it does prize filled. | sent1: if the daystar is not a kind of a inexpedience it does prize filled. sent2: there exists something such that if it is not a inexpedience it prizes filled. sent3: there is something such that if the fact that it is a kind of non-centroidal thing that intumesces is not right then it is a Erethizontidae. sent4: the daystar is a kind of a Hoffman if the fact that it is not a East-sider and it does commingle Talmud does not hold. sent5: there is something such that if that it is a vagrancy and it is a kind of a inexpedience is not true then it does prize filled. sent6: the daystar does prize filled if it is both not a vagrancy and a inexpedience. sent7: if something that is not a kind of a vagrancy is a inexpedience then the fact that it prizes filled is not false. sent8: there is something such that if it is both not a vagrancy and a inexpedience it does prize filled. sent9: there is something such that if that it does not prize undercoat and it is a kind of a brooklet is false it laments. sent10: if the fact that something is not a wax but it is a needle is wrong then it does censor. sent11: if that the daystar is both a vagrancy and a inexpedience does not hold then it prizes filled. sent12: there exists something such that if the fact that it is surgical thing that does force Doctor does not hold then it does adolesce. sent13: there exists something such that if that it is a kind of a vagrancy is not false it does prize filled. sent14: there is something such that if that it is not a tympanist and is dipterous does not hold then it is inexact. sent15: there exists something such that if that it does not prefigure S-shape and is phylogenetic is not correct it does prefigure Lophophora. | (Ex): ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) -> {B}x | sent1: ¬{AB}{aa} -> {B}{aa} sent2: (Ex): ¬{AB}x -> {B}x sent3: (Ex): ¬(¬{AK}x & {IF}x) -> {IL}x sent4: ¬(¬{U}{aa} & {AU}{aa}) -> {AE}{aa} sent5: (Ex): ¬({AA}x & {AB}x) -> {B}x sent6: (¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa} sent7: (x): (¬{AA}x & {AB}x) -> {B}x sent8: (Ex): (¬{AA}x & {AB}x) -> {B}x sent9: (Ex): ¬(¬{CO}x & {AR}x) -> {BK}x sent10: (x): ¬(¬{EU}x & {EA}x) -> {CN}x sent11: ¬({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa} sent12: (Ex): ¬(¬{BI}x & {BD}x) -> {GD}x sent13: (Ex): {AA}x -> {B}x sent14: (Ex): ¬(¬{L}x & {GU}x) -> {EJ}x sent15: (Ex): ¬(¬{HI}x & {BP}x) -> {DP}x | [] | UNKNOWN | [] | UNKNOWN | 2 | null | 15 | 0 | 15 | null | null | null | [] | null | null | $hypothesis$ = there is something such that if that it is not a vagrancy but a inexpedience does not hold then it does prize filled. ; $context$ = sent1: if the daystar is not a kind of a inexpedience it does prize filled. sent2: there exists something such that if it is not a inexpedience it prizes filled. sent3: there is something such that if the fact that it is a kind of non-centroidal thing that intumesces is not right then it is a Erethizontidae. sent4: the daystar is a kind of a Hoffman if the fact that it is not a East-sider and it does commingle Talmud does not hold. sent5: there is something such that if that it is a vagrancy and it is a kind of a inexpedience is not true then it does prize filled. sent6: the daystar does prize filled if it is both not a vagrancy and a inexpedience. sent7: if something that is not a kind of a vagrancy is a inexpedience then the fact that it prizes filled is not false. sent8: there is something such that if it is both not a vagrancy and a inexpedience it does prize filled. sent9: there is something such that if that it does not prize undercoat and it is a kind of a brooklet is false it laments. sent10: if the fact that something is not a wax but it is a needle is wrong then it does censor. sent11: if that the daystar is both a vagrancy and a inexpedience does not hold then it prizes filled. sent12: there exists something such that if the fact that it is surgical thing that does force Doctor does not hold then it does adolesce. sent13: there exists something such that if that it is a kind of a vagrancy is not false it does prize filled. sent14: there is something such that if that it is not a tympanist and is dipterous does not hold then it is inexact. sent15: there exists something such that if that it does not prefigure S-shape and is phylogenetic is not correct it does prefigure Lophophora. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ | DeductionInstance | there exists something such that if it is not a inexpedience it prizes filled. | [
"there exists something such that if the fact that it is surgical thing that does force Doctor does not hold then it does adolesce."
] | [
"there exists something such that if it is not a inexpedience it prizes filled."
] |
the commoner is not agonadal. | sent1: the commoner is estimable and it is technical. sent2: the aquatint is a kind of a mescal and does not force proctoscope if it is a Nereus. sent3: the naphthol is not a technical. sent4: if the backboard is not a Purace then the commoner does prefigure pedigree. sent5: the commoner is not accessional. sent6: the commoner is not non-high-tension and it is a kind of a technical. sent7: the commoner is both a Devanagari and a pickpocket. sent8: if the commoner is high-tension but it is not accessional then it is not agonadal. sent9: the backboard is not a kind of a Purace or it is not a thrust or both if it is not a kind of a curacao. sent10: something does force proctoscope if it is a mescal. sent11: the backboard is not a curacao. sent12: the ablation is not agonadal. sent13: if the commoner prefigures pedigree the fact that it is both not a let and not a Nereus is incorrect. sent14: if that something is not a let and is not a Nereus is incorrect then it is a mescal. sent15: the commoner is a technical. sent16: the khamsin is agonadal if the commoner forces proctoscope. sent17: the backboard is not accessional if the aquatint is a kind of a mescal that does not force proctoscope. sent18: if that the backboard is not high-tension and is technical does not hold then the commoner is agonadal. | ¬{D}{a} | sent1: ({FI}{a} & {B}{a}) sent2: {G}{c} -> ({F}{c} & ¬{E}{c}) sent3: ¬{B}{go} sent4: ¬{J}{b} -> {I}{a} sent5: ¬{C}{a} sent6: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) sent7: ({Q}{a} & {IP}{a}) sent8: ({A}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) -> ¬{D}{a} sent9: ¬{L}{b} -> (¬{J}{b} v ¬{K}{b}) sent10: (x): {F}x -> {E}x sent11: ¬{L}{b} sent12: ¬{D}{ha} sent13: {I}{a} -> ¬(¬{H}{a} & ¬{G}{a}) sent14: (x): ¬(¬{H}x & ¬{G}x) -> {F}x sent15: {B}{a} sent16: {E}{a} -> {D}{ak} sent17: ({F}{c} & ¬{E}{c}) -> ¬{C}{b} sent18: ¬(¬{A}{b} & {B}{b}) -> {D}{a} | [
"sent6 -> int1: the commoner is high-tension.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the commoner is high-tension but it is not accessional.; int2 & sent8 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | [
"sent6 -> int1: {A}{a}; int1 & sent5 -> int2: ({A}{a} & ¬{C}{a}); int2 & sent8 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | 3 | 3 | 15 | 0 | 15 | the khamsin is not a technical. | ¬{B}{ak} | 8 | [
"sent10 -> int3: the commoner forces proctoscope if it is a mescal.; sent14 -> int4: if that the commoner is not a let and it is not a kind of a Nereus is false then it is a mescal.; sent9 & sent11 -> int5: the backboard is not a Purace or is not a kind of a thrust or both.;"
] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the commoner is not agonadal. ; $context$ = sent1: the commoner is estimable and it is technical. sent2: the aquatint is a kind of a mescal and does not force proctoscope if it is a Nereus. sent3: the naphthol is not a technical. sent4: if the backboard is not a Purace then the commoner does prefigure pedigree. sent5: the commoner is not accessional. sent6: the commoner is not non-high-tension and it is a kind of a technical. sent7: the commoner is both a Devanagari and a pickpocket. sent8: if the commoner is high-tension but it is not accessional then it is not agonadal. sent9: the backboard is not a kind of a Purace or it is not a thrust or both if it is not a kind of a curacao. sent10: something does force proctoscope if it is a mescal. sent11: the backboard is not a curacao. sent12: the ablation is not agonadal. sent13: if the commoner prefigures pedigree the fact that it is both not a let and not a Nereus is incorrect. sent14: if that something is not a let and is not a Nereus is incorrect then it is a mescal. sent15: the commoner is a technical. sent16: the khamsin is agonadal if the commoner forces proctoscope. sent17: the backboard is not accessional if the aquatint is a kind of a mescal that does not force proctoscope. sent18: if that the backboard is not high-tension and is technical does not hold then the commoner is agonadal. ; $proof$ = | sent6 -> int1: the commoner is high-tension.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the commoner is high-tension but it is not accessional.; int2 & sent8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ | DeductionInstance | the commoner is not non-high-tension and it is a kind of a technical. | [
"the commoner is not accessional.",
"if the commoner is high-tension but it is not accessional then it is not agonadal."
] | [
"The commoner is a kind of technical.",
"The commoner is a type of technical."
] |
the almsgiver does not prize Cystophora. | sent1: the apogee does prefigure meteorologist. sent2: if that the almsgiver is not a sociable is not false then the icaco does prefigure meteorologist or it is a Horne or both. sent3: something does prize gallbladder and it is a kind of a yew if it is not a kind of a telecommunication. sent4: the fact that something does not prefigure apogee but it is a symbol is not true if it prizes gallbladder. sent5: the almsgiver is polymorphemic if the icaco is not a sociable. sent6: if something does prefigure meteorologist and is not a Horne it does prize Cystophora. sent7: if the fact that either the almsgiver is not a mutant or it is polymorphemic or both is false then it does not prize Cystophora. sent8: if the fact that something is not mutant or it is polymorphemic or both is not correct then it does not prize Cystophora. sent9: if the icaco is unsociable but it is a mutant the almsgiver is not a kind of a unsociable. sent10: that something is a kind of unsociable thing that is mutant hold if it is not polymorphemic. sent11: the almsgiver is polymorphemic. sent12: if the plaice is non-polymorphemic thing that prizes Attica the icaco is not polymorphemic. sent13: something that does not prefigure apogee is not polymorphemic and prizes Attica. sent14: if the icaco is not sociable the fact that the almsgiver is not a kind of a mutant or it is non-polymorphemic or both is not true. sent15: the fisherman does not prefigure indomethacin. sent16: the icaco prefigures meteorologist. sent17: that the icaco does not force cricketer and/or it is temperate is not right. sent18: the comestible is not a telecommunication if the fact that the cricketer is not a telecommunication but it commingles plaice is not true. sent19: the gallbladder does not prefigure meteorologist. sent20: if the fact that the comestible does not prefigure apogee and is a symbol is not right then the plaice does not prefigure apogee. sent21: The meteorologist prefigures icaco. sent22: if the fact that something is either not mutant or not polymorphemic or both is wrong then it does not prize Cystophora. sent23: something is not sociable if it does prefigure meteorologist and it is a kind of a Horne. sent24: if the plaice is not non-mutant and not unsociable then the almsgiver is not a unsociable. | ¬{F}{b} | sent1: {A}{hh} sent2: ¬{C}{b} -> ({A}{a} v {B}{a}) sent3: (x): ¬{L}x -> ({I}x & {K}x) sent4: (x): {I}x -> ¬(¬{H}x & {J}x) sent5: ¬{C}{a} -> {D}{b} sent6: (x): ({A}x & ¬{B}x) -> {F}x sent7: ¬(¬{E}{b} v {D}{b}) -> ¬{F}{b} sent8: (x): ¬(¬{E}x v {D}x) -> ¬{F}x sent9: (¬{C}{a} & {E}{a}) -> ¬{C}{b} sent10: (x): ¬{D}x -> (¬{C}x & {E}x) sent11: {D}{b} sent12: (¬{D}{c} & {G}{c}) -> ¬{D}{a} sent13: (x): ¬{H}x -> (¬{D}x & {G}x) sent14: ¬{C}{a} -> ¬(¬{E}{b} v ¬{D}{b}) sent15: ¬{N}{f} sent16: {A}{a} sent17: ¬(¬{IM}{a} v ¬{GU}{a}) sent18: ¬(¬{L}{e} & {M}{e}) -> ¬{L}{d} sent19: ¬{A}{cm} sent20: ¬(¬{H}{d} & {J}{d}) -> ¬{H}{c} sent21: {AA}{aa} sent22: (x): ¬(¬{E}x v ¬{D}x) -> ¬{F}x sent23: (x): ({A}x & {B}x) -> ¬{C}x sent24: ({E}{c} & {C}{c}) -> ¬{C}{b} | [
"sent23 -> int1: the icaco is not a kind of a sociable if it prefigures meteorologist and is a Horne.; sent22 -> int2: if the fact that either the almsgiver is not a kind of a mutant or it is not polymorphemic or both is not correct then it does not prize Cystophora.;"
] | UNKNOWN | [
"sent23 -> int1: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) -> ¬{C}{a}; sent22 -> int2: ¬(¬{E}{b} v ¬{D}{b}) -> ¬{F}{b};"
] | UNKNOWN | 4 | null | 20 | 0 | 20 | the almsgiver prizes Cystophora. | {F}{b} | 13 | [
"sent6 -> int3: if the almsgiver prefigures meteorologist and is not a Horne then it prizes Cystophora.; sent10 -> int4: if the icaco is not polymorphemic it is unsociable and is not non-mutant.; sent13 -> int5: if the plaice does not prefigure apogee then it is not polymorphemic and prizes Attica.; sent4 -> int6: that the comestible does not prefigure apogee and is a kind of a symbol is not right if it does prize gallbladder.; sent3 -> int7: the comestible prizes gallbladder and is a yew if it is not a kind of a telecommunication.; sent15 -> int8: there exists something such that it does not prefigure indomethacin.;"
] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the almsgiver does not prize Cystophora. ; $context$ = sent1: the apogee does prefigure meteorologist. sent2: if that the almsgiver is not a sociable is not false then the icaco does prefigure meteorologist or it is a Horne or both. sent3: something does prize gallbladder and it is a kind of a yew if it is not a kind of a telecommunication. sent4: the fact that something does not prefigure apogee but it is a symbol is not true if it prizes gallbladder. sent5: the almsgiver is polymorphemic if the icaco is not a sociable. sent6: if something does prefigure meteorologist and is not a Horne it does prize Cystophora. sent7: if the fact that either the almsgiver is not a mutant or it is polymorphemic or both is false then it does not prize Cystophora. sent8: if the fact that something is not mutant or it is polymorphemic or both is not correct then it does not prize Cystophora. sent9: if the icaco is unsociable but it is a mutant the almsgiver is not a kind of a unsociable. sent10: that something is a kind of unsociable thing that is mutant hold if it is not polymorphemic. sent11: the almsgiver is polymorphemic. sent12: if the plaice is non-polymorphemic thing that prizes Attica the icaco is not polymorphemic. sent13: something that does not prefigure apogee is not polymorphemic and prizes Attica. sent14: if the icaco is not sociable the fact that the almsgiver is not a kind of a mutant or it is non-polymorphemic or both is not true. sent15: the fisherman does not prefigure indomethacin. sent16: the icaco prefigures meteorologist. sent17: that the icaco does not force cricketer and/or it is temperate is not right. sent18: the comestible is not a telecommunication if the fact that the cricketer is not a telecommunication but it commingles plaice is not true. sent19: the gallbladder does not prefigure meteorologist. sent20: if the fact that the comestible does not prefigure apogee and is a symbol is not right then the plaice does not prefigure apogee. sent21: The meteorologist prefigures icaco. sent22: if the fact that something is either not mutant or not polymorphemic or both is wrong then it does not prize Cystophora. sent23: something is not sociable if it does prefigure meteorologist and it is a kind of a Horne. sent24: if the plaice is not non-mutant and not unsociable then the almsgiver is not a unsociable. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ | DeductionInstance | something is not sociable if it does prefigure meteorologist and it is a kind of a Horne. | [
"if the fact that something is either not mutant or not polymorphemic or both is wrong then it does not prize Cystophora."
] | [
"something is not sociable if it does prefigure meteorologist and it is a kind of a Horne."
] |
the exuvialness does not occur. | sent1: the bibliomaniacalness and the carnalness happens. sent2: that the exodonticness and the bibliomaniacalness occurs prevents that the exuvialness occurs. sent3: that the exodonticness occurs is brought about by that the prefiguring dessiatine happens. | ¬{D} | sent1: ({C} & {E}) sent2: ({B} & {C}) -> ¬{D} sent3: {A} -> {B} | [
"sent1 -> int1: the bibliomaniacalness occurs.;"
] | UNKNOWN | [
"sent1 -> int1: {C};"
] | UNKNOWN | 3 | null | 0 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | [] | null | null | $hypothesis$ = the exuvialness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the bibliomaniacalness and the carnalness happens. sent2: that the exodonticness and the bibliomaniacalness occurs prevents that the exuvialness occurs. sent3: that the exodonticness occurs is brought about by that the prefiguring dessiatine happens. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ | DeductionInstance | the bibliomaniacalness and the carnalness happens. | [] | [
"the bibliomaniacalness and the carnalness happens."
] |
that there exists something such that if the fact that it is not a radish and is an indexation does not hold it is a Arecidae is not correct. | sent1: if that something does not commingle back-formation but it is a kind of a tournament is not true then it is a pronator. sent2: there is something such that if that it is not an enactment but a clypeus is not right it is a Tolectin. sent3: there is something such that if that it is not an indexation is not wrong it is a Arecidae. sent4: if the bricklayer is not an indexation it is a kind of a Arecidae. sent5: something is a Arecidae if the fact that it is not a radish but an indexation is false. sent6: there is something such that if that it is a radish and it is an indexation does not hold it is a Arecidae. sent7: there exists something such that if that it is not a SLE but immodest does not hold then it does keep. sent8: there is something such that if it is both not a radish and an indexation it is a kind of a Arecidae. sent9: if the fact that the bricklayer is a radish and it is an indexation is not correct then that it is a Arecidae is not false. sent10: if something is not a radish but an indexation then it is a Arecidae. sent11: the bricklayer is a Arecidae if it is not a radish and it is a kind of an indexation. sent12: something is a kind of a Arecidae if it is not a kind of an indexation. sent13: something is a Arecidae if the fact that it is a radish and an indexation is not right. sent14: something is a kind of a Guinevere if that it is a kind of non-inauspicious thing that mourns is not correct. sent15: there exists something such that if that it is not autogenetic and it is a canopy is not true it is a kind of a mass. sent16: if that something is not a Gnostic and is a kind of a broadsword is wrong it does prop. | ¬((Ex): ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) -> {B}x) | sent1: (x): ¬(¬{FH}x & {AI}x) -> {IS}x sent2: (Ex): ¬(¬{BQ}x & {CL}x) -> {CD}x sent3: (Ex): ¬{AB}x -> {B}x sent4: ¬{AB}{aa} -> {B}{aa} sent5: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) -> {B}x sent6: (Ex): ¬({AA}x & {AB}x) -> {B}x sent7: (Ex): ¬(¬{I}x & {Q}x) -> {JA}x sent8: (Ex): (¬{AA}x & {AB}x) -> {B}x sent9: ¬({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa} sent10: (x): (¬{AA}x & {AB}x) -> {B}x sent11: (¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa} sent12: (x): ¬{AB}x -> {B}x sent13: (x): ¬({AA}x & {AB}x) -> {B}x sent14: (x): ¬(¬{ER}x & {BS}x) -> {CC}x sent15: (Ex): ¬(¬{HI}x & {HO}x) -> {BP}x sent16: (x): ¬(¬{BH}x & {JI}x) -> {EO}x | [
"sent5 -> int1: the bricklayer is a kind of a Arecidae if that it is both not a radish and an indexation is wrong.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | [
"sent5 -> int1: ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa}; int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | 2 | 2 | 15 | 0 | 15 | null | null | null | [] | null | null | $hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if the fact that it is not a radish and is an indexation does not hold it is a Arecidae is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if that something does not commingle back-formation but it is a kind of a tournament is not true then it is a pronator. sent2: there is something such that if that it is not an enactment but a clypeus is not right it is a Tolectin. sent3: there is something such that if that it is not an indexation is not wrong it is a Arecidae. sent4: if the bricklayer is not an indexation it is a kind of a Arecidae. sent5: something is a Arecidae if the fact that it is not a radish but an indexation is false. sent6: there is something such that if that it is a radish and it is an indexation does not hold it is a Arecidae. sent7: there exists something such that if that it is not a SLE but immodest does not hold then it does keep. sent8: there is something such that if it is both not a radish and an indexation it is a kind of a Arecidae. sent9: if the fact that the bricklayer is a radish and it is an indexation is not correct then that it is a Arecidae is not false. sent10: if something is not a radish but an indexation then it is a Arecidae. sent11: the bricklayer is a Arecidae if it is not a radish and it is a kind of an indexation. sent12: something is a kind of a Arecidae if it is not a kind of an indexation. sent13: something is a Arecidae if the fact that it is a radish and an indexation is not right. sent14: something is a kind of a Guinevere if that it is a kind of non-inauspicious thing that mourns is not correct. sent15: there exists something such that if that it is not autogenetic and it is a canopy is not true it is a kind of a mass. sent16: if that something is not a Gnostic and is a kind of a broadsword is wrong it does prop. ; $proof$ = | sent5 -> int1: the bricklayer is a kind of a Arecidae if that it is both not a radish and an indexation is wrong.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ | DeductionInstance | something is a Arecidae if the fact that it is not a radish but an indexation is false. | [] | [
"something is a Arecidae if the fact that it is not a radish but an indexation is false."
] |
the Raffia is thalloid. | sent1: something is not endermic if the fact that the fact that it is both a chitin and a bending is true does not hold. sent2: the tomtit is not thalloid if the Raffia is endermic. sent3: the tomtit is endermic. sent4: if the tomtit is a kind of a Catasetum then the longhorn does not reposition. sent5: if the longhorn is endermic then the tomtit repositions. sent6: if the Raffia is thalloid then the longhorn does reposition. sent7: if something is not endermic then that it is thalloid and it does reposition is not false. sent8: if there exists something such that that it does not commingle postlude and it does prize SSRI is not right then the longhorn is a devising. sent9: everything is a kind of a prostate or it does prize guilder or both. sent10: the ruby is supernatural. sent11: the fact that the tomtit does not commingle postlude and prizes SSRI is not correct if the creel is a detachment. sent12: the ruby does prize guilder if the skidpan prize guilder. sent13: the barbital does not reposition. sent14: the tomtit is aerobic. sent15: if something is not endermic then it does reposition and is thalloid. sent16: if that the longhorn does not devise or it is a paygrade or both is not correct that it is a bending is true. sent17: that either the longhorn is not a devising or it is a kind of a paygrade or both is not true. sent18: if the tomtit is thalloid the Raffia is not endermic. sent19: if the tomtit is endermic the longhorn does not reposition. sent20: if something does commingle SSRI it is a detachment. sent21: if a pituitary thing does prize guilder then the creel commingles SSRI. sent22: if the fact that the skidpan is a kind of a prostate is true then the fact that the ruby prizes guilder is right. sent23: the ruby is not non-pituitary if it is a kind of a supernatural. | {A}{a} | sent1: (x): ¬({D}x & {E}x) -> ¬{C}x sent2: {C}{a} -> ¬{A}{c} sent3: {C}{c} sent4: {BD}{c} -> ¬{B}{b} sent5: {C}{b} -> {B}{c} sent6: {A}{a} -> {B}{b} sent7: (x): ¬{C}x -> ({A}x & {B}x) sent8: (x): ¬(¬{H}x & {I}x) -> {G}{b} sent9: (x): ({O}x v {M}x) sent10: {N}{e} sent11: {J}{d} -> ¬(¬{H}{c} & {I}{c}) sent12: {M}{f} -> {M}{e} sent13: ¬{B}{cu} sent14: {IG}{c} sent15: (x): ¬{C}x -> ({B}x & {A}x) sent16: ¬(¬{G}{b} v {F}{b}) -> {E}{b} sent17: ¬(¬{G}{b} v {F}{b}) sent18: {A}{c} -> ¬{C}{a} sent19: {C}{c} -> ¬{B}{b} sent20: (x): {K}x -> {J}x sent21: (x): ({L}x & {M}x) -> {K}{d} sent22: {O}{f} -> {M}{e} sent23: {N}{e} -> {L}{e} | [
"void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Raffia is thalloid.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the longhorn does reposition.; sent19 & sent3 -> int2: the fact that the longhorn does not reposition is right.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | [
"void -> assump1: {A}{a}; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: {B}{b}; sent19 & sent3 -> int2: ¬{B}{b}; int1 & int2 -> int3: #F#; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | 3 | 3 | 20 | 0 | 20 | the Raffia is thalloid. | {A}{a} | 16 | [
"sent7 -> int4: if the Raffia is not endermic then it is thalloid and does reposition.; sent1 -> int5: the Raffia is not endermic if the fact that it is a chitin and it bends is not correct.; sent20 -> int6: if the creel commingles SSRI then it is a detachment.; sent23 & sent10 -> int7: the ruby is a pituitary.; sent9 -> int8: the skidpan either is not non-prostate or prizes guilder or both.; int8 & sent22 & sent12 -> int9: the ruby prizes guilder.; int7 & int9 -> int10: the ruby is a kind of a pituitary that does prize guilder.; int10 -> int11: there exists something such that it is pituitary and prizes guilder.; int11 & sent21 -> int12: the creel commingles SSRI.; int6 & int12 -> int13: the creel is a detachment.; sent11 & int13 -> int14: the fact that the tomtit does not commingle postlude and does prize SSRI is incorrect.; int14 -> int15: there is something such that that it does not commingle postlude and it does prize SSRI is not true.; int15 & sent8 -> int16: the longhorn does devise.;"
] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the Raffia is thalloid. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not endermic if the fact that the fact that it is both a chitin and a bending is true does not hold. sent2: the tomtit is not thalloid if the Raffia is endermic. sent3: the tomtit is endermic. sent4: if the tomtit is a kind of a Catasetum then the longhorn does not reposition. sent5: if the longhorn is endermic then the tomtit repositions. sent6: if the Raffia is thalloid then the longhorn does reposition. sent7: if something is not endermic then that it is thalloid and it does reposition is not false. sent8: if there exists something such that that it does not commingle postlude and it does prize SSRI is not right then the longhorn is a devising. sent9: everything is a kind of a prostate or it does prize guilder or both. sent10: the ruby is supernatural. sent11: the fact that the tomtit does not commingle postlude and prizes SSRI is not correct if the creel is a detachment. sent12: the ruby does prize guilder if the skidpan prize guilder. sent13: the barbital does not reposition. sent14: the tomtit is aerobic. sent15: if something is not endermic then it does reposition and is thalloid. sent16: if that the longhorn does not devise or it is a paygrade or both is not correct that it is a bending is true. sent17: that either the longhorn is not a devising or it is a kind of a paygrade or both is not true. sent18: if the tomtit is thalloid the Raffia is not endermic. sent19: if the tomtit is endermic the longhorn does not reposition. sent20: if something does commingle SSRI it is a detachment. sent21: if a pituitary thing does prize guilder then the creel commingles SSRI. sent22: if the fact that the skidpan is a kind of a prostate is true then the fact that the ruby prizes guilder is right. sent23: the ruby is not non-pituitary if it is a kind of a supernatural. ; $proof$ = | void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Raffia is thalloid.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the longhorn does reposition.; sent19 & sent3 -> int2: the fact that the longhorn does not reposition is right.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ | DeductionInstance | if the Raffia is thalloid then the longhorn does reposition. | [
"if the tomtit is endermic the longhorn does not reposition.",
"the tomtit is endermic."
] | [
"The longhorn does move if the Raffia is thalloid.",
"The longhorn will move if the Raffia is thalloid."
] |
the fact that there exists something such that if it is not an indexation then that it does not prize bondage and is not a kind of a swell does not hold is not true. | sent1: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a rocket that it is not a rhetoric and is not ovine is false. sent2: that something does not force exode but it adds does not hold if it is not residual. sent3: if the barrelfish is not an indexation then it does not prize bondage and it does not swell. sent4: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of an indexation that the fact that it prizes bondage and is not a swell is correct is false. sent5: something does not prize bondage and is not a kind of a swell if it is not a kind of an indexation. sent6: that the barrelfish does not prize bondage and is a kind of a swell is false if it is not a kind of an indexation. sent7: the fact that something does not prize bondage and is not a swell is not right if it is not an indexation. sent8: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a coir the fact that it is a kind of non-Union thing that is plantal is not right. sent9: that something does prize bondage but it is not a kind of a swell is not correct if it is not an indexation. sent10: if the fact that the cricketer is not an explorer hold then the fact that it does not commingle barrelfish and does not prize bondage is wrong. sent11: that the barrelfish prizes bondage and does not swell does not hold if it is not an indexation. sent12: if the barrelfish does not prize bondage then that it is not a attenuation and not year-round is not right. sent13: if something is an indexation the fact that it does not prize bondage and does not swell is incorrect. sent14: if something is a self-improvement the fact that it is not deformational and it does not prize mansard is not true. sent15: something does not prefigure marrow and does not force transgression if it is not an explorer. sent16: the fact that the barrelfish does not prize bondage and is not a swell is incorrect if it is a kind of an indexation. | ¬((Ex): ¬{A}x -> ¬(¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x)) | sent1: (Ex): ¬{K}x -> ¬(¬{DE}x & ¬{JD}x) sent2: (x): ¬{BM}x -> ¬(¬{IR}x & {AL}x) sent3: ¬{A}{aa} -> (¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) sent4: (Ex): ¬{A}x -> ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) sent5: (x): ¬{A}x -> (¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) sent6: ¬{A}{aa} -> ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) sent7: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬(¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) sent8: (Ex): ¬{L}x -> ¬(¬{FR}x & {GI}x) sent9: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) sent10: ¬{CO}{gj} -> ¬(¬{CI}{gj} & ¬{AA}{gj}) sent11: ¬{A}{aa} -> ¬({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) sent12: ¬{AA}{aa} -> ¬(¬{BU}{aa} & ¬{IC}{aa}) sent13: (x): {A}x -> ¬(¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) sent14: (x): {HN}x -> ¬(¬{DK}x & ¬{AN}x) sent15: (x): ¬{CO}x -> (¬{GQ}x & ¬{T}x) sent16: {A}{aa} -> ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) | [
"sent7 -> int1: if the barrelfish is not an indexation then the fact that it does not prize bondage and it is not a kind of a swell is not true.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | [
"sent7 -> int1: ¬{A}{aa} -> ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}); int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | 2 | 2 | 15 | 0 | 15 | null | null | null | [] | null | null | $hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if it is not an indexation then that it does not prize bondage and is not a kind of a swell does not hold is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a rocket that it is not a rhetoric and is not ovine is false. sent2: that something does not force exode but it adds does not hold if it is not residual. sent3: if the barrelfish is not an indexation then it does not prize bondage and it does not swell. sent4: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of an indexation that the fact that it prizes bondage and is not a swell is correct is false. sent5: something does not prize bondage and is not a kind of a swell if it is not a kind of an indexation. sent6: that the barrelfish does not prize bondage and is a kind of a swell is false if it is not a kind of an indexation. sent7: the fact that something does not prize bondage and is not a swell is not right if it is not an indexation. sent8: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a coir the fact that it is a kind of non-Union thing that is plantal is not right. sent9: that something does prize bondage but it is not a kind of a swell is not correct if it is not an indexation. sent10: if the fact that the cricketer is not an explorer hold then the fact that it does not commingle barrelfish and does not prize bondage is wrong. sent11: that the barrelfish prizes bondage and does not swell does not hold if it is not an indexation. sent12: if the barrelfish does not prize bondage then that it is not a attenuation and not year-round is not right. sent13: if something is an indexation the fact that it does not prize bondage and does not swell is incorrect. sent14: if something is a self-improvement the fact that it is not deformational and it does not prize mansard is not true. sent15: something does not prefigure marrow and does not force transgression if it is not an explorer. sent16: the fact that the barrelfish does not prize bondage and is not a swell is incorrect if it is a kind of an indexation. ; $proof$ = | sent7 -> int1: if the barrelfish is not an indexation then the fact that it does not prize bondage and it is not a kind of a swell is not true.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ | DeductionInstance | the fact that something does not prize bondage and is not a swell is not right if it is not an indexation. | [] | [
"the fact that something does not prize bondage and is not a swell is not right if it is not an indexation."
] |
that there is something such that if it is not a kind of a thioridazine then it is terpsichorean and it is not a tidy is incorrect. | sent1: the bit is a kind of a Essene and does not prefigure forehead if it is a thioridazine. sent2: there is something such that if it is a kind of a curiosa then it is a kind of a PAGAD that does not prefigure motley. sent3: the motley commingles Bombyx and it does commingle Harrisia if it does not outstay. sent4: there is something such that if it is not a Eburophyton it is croupy and it is not a kind of a Ophiophagus. sent5: something does prefigure corm and is not prokaryotic if it is not a kind of a talkie. sent6: there is something such that if it is unpaintable then it is perianal and does not feel. sent7: there is something such that if it does not prefigure Quaoar it is not a kind of a Goldman. sent8: there exists something such that if it does prefigure Notophthalmus then it is a mud and it is not a kind of a iodocompound. sent9: there is something such that if it does not prefigure Mariehamn it is bolometric. sent10: there exists something such that if it is not conditional it is a negative that is not incorrect. sent11: if the calyptra is not gluttonous then it is hemic and is not terpsichorean. sent12: the calyptra is a Halenia but not a goosefoot if it is not a tidy. sent13: the tonsure tidies but it is not a kind of a ping if it does not prefigure Lota. sent14: if the fact that the calyptra is not a kind of a thioridazine is correct then it is terpsichorean and it is not a tidy. sent15: there is something such that if the fact that it is not conditional is correct it does prize Celtic. | ¬((Ex): ¬{A}x -> ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x)) | sent1: {A}{cq} -> ({N}{cq} & ¬{HO}{cq}) sent2: (Ex): {IG}x -> ({BT}x & ¬{DU}x) sent3: ¬{DK}{n} -> ({AC}{n} & {DQ}{n}) sent4: (Ex): ¬{T}x -> ({DD}x & ¬{JK}x) sent5: (x): ¬{GK}x -> ({BE}x & ¬{GE}x) sent6: (Ex): {GS}x -> ({G}x & ¬{HD}x) sent7: (Ex): ¬{IF}x -> ¬{HB}x sent8: (Ex): {AI}x -> ({CU}x & ¬{JB}x) sent9: (Ex): ¬{BJ}x -> {D}x sent10: (Ex): ¬{HU}x -> ({FK}x & ¬{Q}x) sent11: ¬{GF}{aa} -> ({AO}{aa} & ¬{AA}{aa}) sent12: ¬{AB}{aa} -> ({EF}{aa} & ¬{CL}{aa}) sent13: ¬{B}{cf} -> ({AB}{cf} & ¬{FU}{cf}) sent14: ¬{A}{aa} -> ({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) sent15: (Ex): ¬{HU}x -> {HM}x | [
"sent14 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | [
"sent14 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | 1 | 1 | 14 | 0 | 14 | there exists something such that if that it is not a talkie is not incorrect it does prefigure corm and it is not prokaryotic. | (Ex): ¬{GK}x -> ({BE}x & ¬{GE}x) | 2 | [
"sent5 -> int1: the Lota prefigures corm but it is not prokaryotic if it is not a talkie.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | PROVED | $hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if it is not a kind of a thioridazine then it is terpsichorean and it is not a tidy is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the bit is a kind of a Essene and does not prefigure forehead if it is a thioridazine. sent2: there is something such that if it is a kind of a curiosa then it is a kind of a PAGAD that does not prefigure motley. sent3: the motley commingles Bombyx and it does commingle Harrisia if it does not outstay. sent4: there is something such that if it is not a Eburophyton it is croupy and it is not a kind of a Ophiophagus. sent5: something does prefigure corm and is not prokaryotic if it is not a kind of a talkie. sent6: there is something such that if it is unpaintable then it is perianal and does not feel. sent7: there is something such that if it does not prefigure Quaoar it is not a kind of a Goldman. sent8: there exists something such that if it does prefigure Notophthalmus then it is a mud and it is not a kind of a iodocompound. sent9: there is something such that if it does not prefigure Mariehamn it is bolometric. sent10: there exists something such that if it is not conditional it is a negative that is not incorrect. sent11: if the calyptra is not gluttonous then it is hemic and is not terpsichorean. sent12: the calyptra is a Halenia but not a goosefoot if it is not a tidy. sent13: the tonsure tidies but it is not a kind of a ping if it does not prefigure Lota. sent14: if the fact that the calyptra is not a kind of a thioridazine is correct then it is terpsichorean and it is not a tidy. sent15: there is something such that if the fact that it is not conditional is correct it does prize Celtic. ; $proof$ = | sent14 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ | DeductionInstance | if the fact that the calyptra is not a kind of a thioridazine is correct then it is terpsichorean and it is not a tidy. | [] | [
"if the fact that the calyptra is not a kind of a thioridazine is correct then it is terpsichorean and it is not a tidy."
] |
the cheetah does prefigure Bruckner or prefigures Limicolae or both. | sent1: that the cheetah does tarnish but it does not prefigure Limicolae is not correct. sent2: the cheetah is a obliterator if it is a kind of a Adzhar. sent3: if the cheetah is psychosexual it prizes menu. sent4: something prefigures Bruckner if it maps. sent5: the fact that either something prefigures Bruckner or it does prefigure Limicolae or both is not right if it is not psychosexual. sent6: if the Percheron does not tilt but it prizes crewelwork the umber is not a tarnish. sent7: the cheetah does prize buttonhole and/or does prefigure Bruckner. sent8: something is not a tilt but it does prize crewelwork if it is not Churchillian. sent9: if the Percheron is not weedless and it is not truthful then it is not Churchillian. sent10: the cheetah maps if it is psychosexual. sent11: the cheetah is telegraphic. | ({C}{a} v {D}{a}) | sent1: ¬({E}{a} & ¬{D}{a}) sent2: {CO}{a} -> {FG}{a} sent3: {A}{a} -> {IC}{a} sent4: (x): {B}x -> {C}x sent5: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬({C}x v {D}x) sent6: (¬{F}{c} & {G}{c}) -> ¬{E}{b} sent7: ({HM}{a} v {C}{a}) sent8: (x): ¬{H}x -> (¬{F}x & {G}x) sent9: (¬{I}{c} & ¬{J}{c}) -> ¬{H}{c} sent10: {A}{a} -> {B}{a} sent11: {CR}{a} | [
"sent4 -> int1: the cheetah prefigures Bruckner if it does map.;"
] | UNKNOWN | [
"sent4 -> int1: {B}{a} -> {C}{a};"
] | UNKNOWN | 3 | null | 9 | 0 | 9 | that the cheetah does prefigure Bruckner and/or it does prefigure Limicolae is not true. | ¬({C}{a} v {D}{a}) | 7 | [
"sent5 -> int2: if that the cheetah is not psychosexual is right then the fact that it does prefigure Bruckner and/or it prefigures Limicolae does not hold.; sent8 -> int3: the Percheron is not a tilt and does prize crewelwork if it is not Churchillian.;"
] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the cheetah does prefigure Bruckner or prefigures Limicolae or both. ; $context$ = sent1: that the cheetah does tarnish but it does not prefigure Limicolae is not correct. sent2: the cheetah is a obliterator if it is a kind of a Adzhar. sent3: if the cheetah is psychosexual it prizes menu. sent4: something prefigures Bruckner if it maps. sent5: the fact that either something prefigures Bruckner or it does prefigure Limicolae or both is not right if it is not psychosexual. sent6: if the Percheron does not tilt but it prizes crewelwork the umber is not a tarnish. sent7: the cheetah does prize buttonhole and/or does prefigure Bruckner. sent8: something is not a tilt but it does prize crewelwork if it is not Churchillian. sent9: if the Percheron is not weedless and it is not truthful then it is not Churchillian. sent10: the cheetah maps if it is psychosexual. sent11: the cheetah is telegraphic. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ | DeductionInstance | something prefigures Bruckner if it maps. | [] | [
"something prefigures Bruckner if it maps."
] |
there is something such that it does not burp. | sent1: The PAGAD does not force spastic. sent2: the spastic is not a alkylbenzene. sent3: there exists something such that it is a kind of a hyoscyamine. sent4: that something does not instill and is not a Protestant is not true if it does not prefigure descendants. sent5: the spastic does not force PAGAD. sent6: if that the spastic is not attitudinal is not incorrect it does not burp and it does not prize retrofit. sent7: everything does not prefigure descendants. sent8: if something either does not force PAGAD or is uninfluential or both then the descendants does not force PAGAD. sent9: that something is non-uninfluential thing that does not pretend is not correct if it does not prize Phlebodium. sent10: if the spastic is not a hyoscyamine then it is not disorderly and is not circulatory. sent11: there exists something such that it is not a bioremediation. sent12: if there is something such that that it is a kind of non-uninfluential thing that does not pretend is incorrect then the spastic is uninfluential. sent13: the spastic does not force PAGAD if it is not a twinjet. sent14: if the spastic does not force PAGAD then it does not burp and it is not a hyoscyamine. sent15: the noseband does not burp and it is not maxillofacial if it is not disreputable. sent16: if that the potpie does not instill and it is not Protestant does not hold then it does not prize Phlebodium. | (Ex): ¬{AA}x | sent1: ¬{AC}{aa} sent2: ¬{BB}{a} sent3: (Ex): {AB}x sent4: (x): ¬{G}x -> ¬(¬{E}x & ¬{F}x) sent5: ¬{A}{a} sent6: ¬{HH}{a} -> (¬{AA}{a} & ¬{BM}{a}) sent7: (x): ¬{G}x sent8: (x): (¬{A}x v {C}x) -> ¬{A}{cc} sent9: (x): ¬{B}x -> ¬(¬{C}x & ¬{D}x) sent10: ¬{AB}{a} -> (¬{EK}{a} & ¬{AG}{a}) sent11: (Ex): ¬{AP}x sent12: (x): ¬(¬{C}x & ¬{D}x) -> {C}{a} sent13: ¬{AK}{a} -> ¬{A}{a} sent14: ¬{A}{a} -> (¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) sent15: ¬{CK}{bq} -> (¬{AA}{bq} & ¬{DB}{bq}) sent16: ¬(¬{E}{b} & ¬{F}{b}) -> ¬{B}{b} | [
"sent14 & sent5 -> int1: the spastic does not burp and is not a kind of a hyoscyamine.; int1 -> int2: the spastic does not burp.; int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | [
"sent14 & sent5 -> int1: (¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}); int1 -> int2: ¬{AA}{a}; int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | 3 | 3 | 14 | 0 | 14 | the descendants does not force PAGAD. | ¬{A}{cc} | 11 | [
"sent4 -> int3: if the epileptic does not prefigure descendants that it does not instill and it is not a kind of a Protestant is false.; sent7 -> int4: the epileptic does not prefigure descendants.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the epileptic does not instill and it is not a Protestant does not hold.; int5 -> int6: there is nothing such that it does not instill and it is not a Protestant.; int6 -> int7: the fact that the potpie does not instill and is not a kind of a Protestant does not hold.; sent16 & int7 -> int8: the potpie does not prize Phlebodium.; sent9 -> int9: that the potpie is a kind of influential thing that does not pretend is not right if it does not prize Phlebodium.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the fact that the potpie is not uninfluential and it does not pretend is incorrect.; int10 -> int11: there is something such that that it is not uninfluential and it does not pretend is false.; sent12 & int11 -> int12: the spastic is uninfluential.; int12 -> int13: the spastic does not force PAGAD and/or it is uninfluential.; int13 -> int14: something either does not force PAGAD or is uninfluential or both.; int14 & sent8 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | PROVED | $hypothesis$ = there is something such that it does not burp. ; $context$ = sent1: The PAGAD does not force spastic. sent2: the spastic is not a alkylbenzene. sent3: there exists something such that it is a kind of a hyoscyamine. sent4: that something does not instill and is not a Protestant is not true if it does not prefigure descendants. sent5: the spastic does not force PAGAD. sent6: if that the spastic is not attitudinal is not incorrect it does not burp and it does not prize retrofit. sent7: everything does not prefigure descendants. sent8: if something either does not force PAGAD or is uninfluential or both then the descendants does not force PAGAD. sent9: that something is non-uninfluential thing that does not pretend is not correct if it does not prize Phlebodium. sent10: if the spastic is not a hyoscyamine then it is not disorderly and is not circulatory. sent11: there exists something such that it is not a bioremediation. sent12: if there is something such that that it is a kind of non-uninfluential thing that does not pretend is incorrect then the spastic is uninfluential. sent13: the spastic does not force PAGAD if it is not a twinjet. sent14: if the spastic does not force PAGAD then it does not burp and it is not a hyoscyamine. sent15: the noseband does not burp and it is not maxillofacial if it is not disreputable. sent16: if that the potpie does not instill and it is not Protestant does not hold then it does not prize Phlebodium. ; $proof$ = | sent14 & sent5 -> int1: the spastic does not burp and is not a kind of a hyoscyamine.; int1 -> int2: the spastic does not burp.; int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ | DeductionInstance | if the spastic does not force PAGAD then it does not burp and it is not a hyoscyamine. | [
"the spastic does not force PAGAD."
] | [
"if the spastic does not force PAGAD then it does not burp and it is not a hyoscyamine."
] |
the fact that the passing does prize scratch and is not mammary is false. | sent1: something does weave and is bidirectional if it does not prize hatchway. sent2: the agave does not prize hatchway if the coalman is not restless. sent3: the fact that the passing does cicatrize but it is not mammary does not hold. sent4: if the fact that the agave does weave is not false then the passing does prize scratch but it is not mammary. sent5: that the passing prizes scratch and it is mammary does not hold. sent6: if the passing is a aneroid that prizes scratch then it is not antiapartheid. sent7: the hatchway is not mammary. sent8: the sclera is not mammary. sent9: something is not restless if it prefigures coauthor. sent10: the passing does not force knish. sent11: if something that prizes scratch is not mammary it is not bidirectional. | ¬({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) | sent1: (x): ¬{C}x -> ({A}x & {B}x) sent2: ¬{D}{b} -> ¬{C}{a} sent3: ¬({CF}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) sent4: {A}{a} -> ({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) sent5: ¬({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) sent6: ({IH}{aa} & {AA}{aa}) -> ¬{N}{aa} sent7: ¬{AB}{jc} sent8: ¬{AB}{bl} sent9: (x): {E}x -> ¬{D}x sent10: ¬{FD}{aa} sent11: (x): ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> ¬{B}x | [
"sent11 -> int1: the passing is not bidirectional if it prizes scratch and it is not mammary.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the passing does prize scratch and is not mammary.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the passing is non-bidirectional.;"
] | UNKNOWN | [
"sent11 -> int1: ({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> ¬{B}{aa}; void -> assump1: ({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}); int1 & assump1 -> int2: ¬{B}{aa};"
] | UNKNOWN | 4 | null | 10 | 0 | 10 | the fact that the passing does prize scratch and is not mammary is right. | ({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) | 7 | [
"sent1 -> int3: the agave weaves and it is bidirectional if it does not prize hatchway.; sent9 -> int4: if the coalman prefigures coauthor then it is not restless.;"
] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the fact that the passing does prize scratch and is not mammary is false. ; $context$ = sent1: something does weave and is bidirectional if it does not prize hatchway. sent2: the agave does not prize hatchway if the coalman is not restless. sent3: the fact that the passing does cicatrize but it is not mammary does not hold. sent4: if the fact that the agave does weave is not false then the passing does prize scratch but it is not mammary. sent5: that the passing prizes scratch and it is mammary does not hold. sent6: if the passing is a aneroid that prizes scratch then it is not antiapartheid. sent7: the hatchway is not mammary. sent8: the sclera is not mammary. sent9: something is not restless if it prefigures coauthor. sent10: the passing does not force knish. sent11: if something that prizes scratch is not mammary it is not bidirectional. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ | DeductionInstance | if something that prizes scratch is not mammary it is not bidirectional. | [] | [
"if something that prizes scratch is not mammary it is not bidirectional."
] |
the lacer is agreeable. | sent1: if there is something such that that it is an antioxidant and is a kind of a Lophophora is incorrect the lacer is agreeable. sent2: the tonometer unifies if there is something such that it is non-invertible. sent3: the paraldehyde is a Lophophora if the fact that the buddy is indulgent hold. sent4: if that something unifies is not wrong it is indulgent. sent5: the paraldehyde is a kind of a Lophophora if the buddy is a abecedarian. sent6: if something is not a Lophophora then the fact that the lacer is agreeable is right. sent7: something is non-invertible. sent8: if there exists something such that it is not a kind of a anaspid then that the fact that the paraldehyde is an antioxidant and it is a Lophophora is not false is incorrect. sent9: the fact that the lacer is agreeable and it is a Lophophora does not hold. sent10: if there exists something such that it is indulgent the buddy is indulgent and/or it is a abecedarian. sent11: if something is not a anaspid the fact that it is a kind of a tobacconist that is polymeric is not true. | {D}{b} | sent1: (x): ¬({B}x & {C}x) -> {D}{b} sent2: (x): {H}x -> {G}{d} sent3: {F}{c} -> {C}{a} sent4: (x): {G}x -> {F}x sent5: {E}{c} -> {C}{a} sent6: (x): ¬{C}x -> {D}{b} sent7: (Ex): {H}x sent8: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬({B}{a} & {C}{a}) sent9: ¬({D}{b} & {C}{b}) sent10: (x): {F}x -> ({F}{c} v {E}{c}) sent11: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬({FP}x & {FK}x) | [] | UNKNOWN | [] | UNKNOWN | 3 | null | 9 | 0 | 9 | that the lacer is not agreeable is true. | ¬{D}{b} | 9 | [
"sent4 -> int1: if the tonometer does unify it is indulgent.; sent7 & sent2 -> int2: the tonometer unifies.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the tonometer is indulgent is not wrong.; int3 -> int4: there is something such that that it is indulgent is true.; int4 & sent10 -> int5: the buddy is indulgent and/or it is a kind of a abecedarian.; int5 & sent3 & sent5 -> int6: the paraldehyde is a Lophophora.;"
] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the lacer is agreeable. ; $context$ = sent1: if there is something such that that it is an antioxidant and is a kind of a Lophophora is incorrect the lacer is agreeable. sent2: the tonometer unifies if there is something such that it is non-invertible. sent3: the paraldehyde is a Lophophora if the fact that the buddy is indulgent hold. sent4: if that something unifies is not wrong it is indulgent. sent5: the paraldehyde is a kind of a Lophophora if the buddy is a abecedarian. sent6: if something is not a Lophophora then the fact that the lacer is agreeable is right. sent7: something is non-invertible. sent8: if there exists something such that it is not a kind of a anaspid then that the fact that the paraldehyde is an antioxidant and it is a Lophophora is not false is incorrect. sent9: the fact that the lacer is agreeable and it is a Lophophora does not hold. sent10: if there exists something such that it is indulgent the buddy is indulgent and/or it is a abecedarian. sent11: if something is not a anaspid the fact that it is a kind of a tobacconist that is polymeric is not true. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ | DeductionInstance | the paraldehyde is a Lophophora if the fact that the buddy is indulgent hold. | [
"the fact that the lacer is agreeable and it is a Lophophora does not hold."
] | [
"the paraldehyde is a Lophophora if the fact that the buddy is indulgent hold."
] |
that the heroine is not prime but it is abstemious hold. | sent1: if the brooding does prime then the fact that the heroine is not abstemious and not prime is not correct. sent2: the fact that the brooding is prime thing that does prefigure organza is false. sent3: if the heroine is a kind of a buckboard then it is abstemious. sent4: if that the brooding is abstemious is not incorrect then the fact that the heroine is a buckboard that is abstemious is not true. sent5: the brooding does not prefigure falchion if there exists something such that that it is not a kind of a prime and it is dissuasive is incorrect. sent6: if the brooding is not non-prime that the heroine is abstemious a non-prime does not hold. sent7: the brooding is abstemious if it is a prime. sent8: the brooding is a kind of a buckboard. sent9: if the heroine is a buckboard then the fact that the brooding is both a prime and a buckboard is not true. sent10: if the brooding is a buckboard then it is a kind of a iproclozide. sent11: if the brooding is abstemious it is a kind of a prime. sent12: the heroine is a skin-dive if it is a kind of a buckboard. sent13: if the brooding is a buckboard then it is abstemious. sent14: if the brooding is abstemious that the heroine is not prime but abstemious is not true. | (¬{D}{b} & {B}{b}) | sent1: {D}{a} -> ¬(¬{B}{b} & {D}{b}) sent2: ¬({D}{a} & {CT}{a}) sent3: {A}{b} -> {B}{b} sent4: {B}{a} -> ¬({A}{b} & {B}{b}) sent5: (x): ¬(¬{D}x & {E}x) -> ¬{C}{a} sent6: {D}{a} -> ¬({B}{b} & {D}{b}) sent7: {D}{a} -> {B}{a} sent8: {A}{a} sent9: {A}{b} -> ¬({D}{a} & {A}{a}) sent10: {A}{a} -> {GK}{a} sent11: {B}{a} -> {D}{a} sent12: {A}{b} -> {CA}{b} sent13: {A}{a} -> {B}{a} sent14: {B}{a} -> ¬(¬{D}{b} & {B}{b}) | [
"sent13 & sent8 -> int1: the brooding is abstemious.; sent14 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | [
"sent13 & sent8 -> int1: {B}{a}; sent14 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | 2 | 2 | 11 | 0 | 11 | that the balsamroot is a buckboard is right. | {A}{dq} | 8 | [] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = that the heroine is not prime but it is abstemious hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the brooding does prime then the fact that the heroine is not abstemious and not prime is not correct. sent2: the fact that the brooding is prime thing that does prefigure organza is false. sent3: if the heroine is a kind of a buckboard then it is abstemious. sent4: if that the brooding is abstemious is not incorrect then the fact that the heroine is a buckboard that is abstemious is not true. sent5: the brooding does not prefigure falchion if there exists something such that that it is not a kind of a prime and it is dissuasive is incorrect. sent6: if the brooding is not non-prime that the heroine is abstemious a non-prime does not hold. sent7: the brooding is abstemious if it is a prime. sent8: the brooding is a kind of a buckboard. sent9: if the heroine is a buckboard then the fact that the brooding is both a prime and a buckboard is not true. sent10: if the brooding is a buckboard then it is a kind of a iproclozide. sent11: if the brooding is abstemious it is a kind of a prime. sent12: the heroine is a skin-dive if it is a kind of a buckboard. sent13: if the brooding is a buckboard then it is abstemious. sent14: if the brooding is abstemious that the heroine is not prime but abstemious is not true. ; $proof$ = | sent13 & sent8 -> int1: the brooding is abstemious.; sent14 & int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ | DeductionInstance | if the brooding is a buckboard then it is abstemious. | [
"the brooding is a kind of a buckboard.",
"if the brooding is abstemious that the heroine is not prime but abstemious is not true."
] | [
"The brooding is a buckboard.",
"If the brooding is a buckboard, then it is morally reprehensible."
] |
the storksbill is not a hydantoin. | sent1: if something is not a kind of a Confederacy the fact that it is a kind of a hydantoin and it is not a kind of a ferrule is not true. sent2: something either regroups or is a hydantoin or both if it is not a kind of a Hejaz. sent3: something does prefigure songwriter and it is a kind of a lowland. sent4: something is a hydantoin if it is a kind of a Confederacy. sent5: something does prefigure Buddhism if it prizes better. sent6: if the metatherian is a kind of non-hydrokinetic thing that is not livable then it does prize better. sent7: if something does prefigure Buddhism the fact that it does not commingle Balaenicipitidae and is not a mush is incorrect. sent8: if the fact that the storksbill is a ferrule is correct then the potpie is a kind of a Confederacy. sent9: the admixture is not a kind of a Dutch if something that prefigures songwriter is lowland. sent10: the storksbill is a ferrule. sent11: the storksbill is a Confederacy and a ferrule. sent12: if something is a kind of a Demavend it is unintrusive. sent13: the fact that the metatherian is not hydrokinetic and it is not livable hold if there is something such that it is not a Dutch. sent14: something is not a kind of a Hejaz if that it does not commingle Balaenicipitidae and does not mush is not right. sent15: the homeless does commingle potpie and is a kind of a hydantoin. sent16: if the fact that something is a hydantoin is not wrong then it is a kind of a ferrule. sent17: the fact that the noseband is a Confederacy is not incorrect. sent18: the storksbill is a hexane if it prefigures malfeasance. sent19: the llama is a kind of a Confederacy that is a gratuity. | ¬{C}{a} | sent1: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬({C}x & ¬{B}x) sent2: (x): ¬{E}x -> ({D}x v {C}x) sent3: (Ex): ({N}x & {M}x) sent4: (x): {A}x -> {C}x sent5: (x): {I}x -> {H}x sent6: (¬{J}{b} & ¬{K}{b}) -> {I}{b} sent7: (x): {H}x -> ¬(¬{G}x & ¬{F}x) sent8: {B}{a} -> {A}{ik} sent9: (x): ({N}x & {M}x) -> ¬{L}{c} sent10: {B}{a} sent11: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) sent12: (x): {AJ}x -> {DC}x sent13: (x): ¬{L}x -> (¬{J}{b} & ¬{K}{b}) sent14: (x): ¬(¬{G}x & ¬{F}x) -> ¬{E}x sent15: ({HH}{gn} & {C}{gn}) sent16: (x): {C}x -> {B}x sent17: {A}{ip} sent18: {FB}{a} -> {EB}{a} sent19: ({A}{af} & {GI}{af}) | [
"sent11 -> int1: the storksbill is a Confederacy.; sent4 -> int2: the storksbill is a hydantoin if it is a kind of a Confederacy.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | [
"sent11 -> int1: {A}{a}; sent4 -> int2: {A}{a} -> {C}{a}; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | 2 | 2 | 17 | 0 | 17 | the storksbill is not a hydantoin. | ¬{C}{a} | 5 | [
"sent1 -> int3: if the metatherian is not a Confederacy then that it is a kind of a hydantoin and it is not a ferrule is false.;"
] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the storksbill is not a hydantoin. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not a kind of a Confederacy the fact that it is a kind of a hydantoin and it is not a kind of a ferrule is not true. sent2: something either regroups or is a hydantoin or both if it is not a kind of a Hejaz. sent3: something does prefigure songwriter and it is a kind of a lowland. sent4: something is a hydantoin if it is a kind of a Confederacy. sent5: something does prefigure Buddhism if it prizes better. sent6: if the metatherian is a kind of non-hydrokinetic thing that is not livable then it does prize better. sent7: if something does prefigure Buddhism the fact that it does not commingle Balaenicipitidae and is not a mush is incorrect. sent8: if the fact that the storksbill is a ferrule is correct then the potpie is a kind of a Confederacy. sent9: the admixture is not a kind of a Dutch if something that prefigures songwriter is lowland. sent10: the storksbill is a ferrule. sent11: the storksbill is a Confederacy and a ferrule. sent12: if something is a kind of a Demavend it is unintrusive. sent13: the fact that the metatherian is not hydrokinetic and it is not livable hold if there is something such that it is not a Dutch. sent14: something is not a kind of a Hejaz if that it does not commingle Balaenicipitidae and does not mush is not right. sent15: the homeless does commingle potpie and is a kind of a hydantoin. sent16: if the fact that something is a hydantoin is not wrong then it is a kind of a ferrule. sent17: the fact that the noseband is a Confederacy is not incorrect. sent18: the storksbill is a hexane if it prefigures malfeasance. sent19: the llama is a kind of a Confederacy that is a gratuity. ; $proof$ = | sent11 -> int1: the storksbill is a Confederacy.; sent4 -> int2: the storksbill is a hydantoin if it is a kind of a Confederacy.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ | DeductionInstance | the storksbill is a Confederacy and a ferrule. | [
"something is a hydantoin if it is a kind of a Confederacy."
] | [
"the storksbill is a Confederacy and a ferrule."
] |
the dimensionalness happens if the creeping happens. | sent1: the fact that the rout occurs is right. sent2: that the moralness occurs does not hold. sent3: that the deep-seaness happens is not wrong. sent4: the prizing Zealander occurs if the sublingualness happens. sent5: that the stalking does not occur is true. sent6: the shockableness does not occur. sent7: the serialness does not occur. sent8: if that the dimensionalness does not occur is correct then the creeps happens. sent9: the begrudging happens. | {B} -> {A} | sent1: {M} sent2: ¬{HA} sent3: {AH} sent4: {CK} -> {BM} sent5: ¬{CL} sent6: ¬{BH} sent7: ¬{JC} sent8: ¬{A} -> {B} sent9: {GF} | [
"void -> assump1: Let's assume that the dimensionalness does not occur.;"
] | UNKNOWN | [
"void -> assump1: ¬{A};"
] | UNKNOWN | 4 | null | 9 | 0 | 9 | null | null | null | [] | null | null | $hypothesis$ = the dimensionalness happens if the creeping happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the rout occurs is right. sent2: that the moralness occurs does not hold. sent3: that the deep-seaness happens is not wrong. sent4: the prizing Zealander occurs if the sublingualness happens. sent5: that the stalking does not occur is true. sent6: the shockableness does not occur. sent7: the serialness does not occur. sent8: if that the dimensionalness does not occur is correct then the creeps happens. sent9: the begrudging happens. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ | DeductionInstance | [
""
] | [
""
] |
|
something is back-channel and it is a Gilgamish. | sent1: there is something such that it is back-channel. sent2: there is something such that it is a Gilgamish. sent3: something is a kind of a barbital. sent4: there exists something such that the fact that it does commingle whydah and it is a high is right. sent5: there is something such that it forces trimester. sent6: if something is a seer it is a disloyalty. sent7: that the capulin is back-channel is true. sent8: if there is something such that that it is not a Gilgamish and it is a anionic is incorrect then the capulin is inaccurate. sent9: something forces Tarzan but it is not back-channel if it is a disloyalty. sent10: something prefigures wake and it is a zinkenite. sent11: if there is something such that that it does not gyrate and is not a Daviesia is not true then the laureate does not socialize. sent12: the fact that the laureate is not a kind of a Gilgamish and is a anionic is incorrect if it does not socialize. sent13: the capulin is a Gilgamish. sent14: there is something such that it is a zinkenite. sent15: there exists something such that that it does not gyrate and is not a kind of a Daviesia is not correct. | (Ex): ({A}x & {B}x) | sent1: (Ex): {A}x sent2: (Ex): {B}x sent3: (Ex): {AB}x sent4: (Ex): ({DJ}x & {CD}x) sent5: (Ex): {DI}x sent6: (x): {E}x -> {D}x sent7: {A}{a} sent8: (x): ¬(¬{B}x & {C}x) -> {AD}{a} sent9: (x): {D}x -> ({HN}x & ¬{A}x) sent10: (Ex): ({BF}x & {EE}x) sent11: (x): ¬(¬{I}x & ¬{J}x) -> ¬{F}{b} sent12: ¬{F}{b} -> ¬(¬{B}{b} & {C}{b}) sent13: {B}{a} sent14: (Ex): {EE}x sent15: (Ex): ¬(¬{I}x & ¬{J}x) | [
"sent7 & sent13 -> int1: the capulin is a kind of back-channel thing that is a Gilgamish.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | [
"sent7 & sent13 -> int1: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}); int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | 2 | 2 | 13 | 0 | 13 | the capulin is not accurate and it forces Tarzan. | ({AD}{a} & {HN}{a}) | 5 | [
"sent15 & sent11 -> int2: that the laureate does not socialize is not false.; sent12 & int2 -> int3: that the laureate is both not a Gilgamish and a anionic is wrong.; int3 -> int4: there is something such that that that it is not a kind of a Gilgamish and is anionic is correct does not hold.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: the capulin is inaccurate.; sent9 -> int6: the capulin does force Tarzan and is non-back-channel if it is a disloyalty.; sent6 -> int7: if the capulin is a seer it is a disloyalty.;"
] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = something is back-channel and it is a Gilgamish. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that it is back-channel. sent2: there is something such that it is a Gilgamish. sent3: something is a kind of a barbital. sent4: there exists something such that the fact that it does commingle whydah and it is a high is right. sent5: there is something such that it forces trimester. sent6: if something is a seer it is a disloyalty. sent7: that the capulin is back-channel is true. sent8: if there is something such that that it is not a Gilgamish and it is a anionic is incorrect then the capulin is inaccurate. sent9: something forces Tarzan but it is not back-channel if it is a disloyalty. sent10: something prefigures wake and it is a zinkenite. sent11: if there is something such that that it does not gyrate and is not a Daviesia is not true then the laureate does not socialize. sent12: the fact that the laureate is not a kind of a Gilgamish and is a anionic is incorrect if it does not socialize. sent13: the capulin is a Gilgamish. sent14: there is something such that it is a zinkenite. sent15: there exists something such that that it does not gyrate and is not a kind of a Daviesia is not correct. ; $proof$ = | sent7 & sent13 -> int1: the capulin is a kind of back-channel thing that is a Gilgamish.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ | DeductionInstance | that the capulin is back-channel is true. | [
"the capulin is a Gilgamish."
] | [
"that the capulin is back-channel is true."
] |
the fact that the meteorite is both not non-Amharic and not Celtic is false. | sent1: the cornhusk is a sass if the sociolinguist is a sass. sent2: if that the cornhusk is a kind of a sass is right then the fact that that it is not a kind of a downtown and does not commingle raree-show is correct is not correct. sent3: something that is a CT is a Amharic that is not Celtic. sent4: the woad is not autotrophic. sent5: the breadfruit is not a kind of a Amharic. sent6: that something is random but it is not a Signora is false if that it is not a kind of a CT is right. sent7: the sociolinguist does sass if there is something such that that it is both not a sass and not a diestock is incorrect. sent8: if the Land is a Celtic but it is not Amharic then the meteorite is not a kind of a Signora. sent9: if the meteorite is not a kind of a CT but it is hypophyseal the tonsure is not a CT. sent10: if the meteorite is not non-Amharic but it is not a Celtic the Land is not a kind of a Signora. sent11: the quasar is not a half-mast if that the dishwater does prefigure arresting and is a kind of a half-mast does not hold. sent12: that the meteorite is not a CT but it is hypophyseal hold if the Land is not parametric. sent13: the Land is a Signora. sent14: the Land is Celtic. sent15: if the Land is a Signora but not Amharic then the meteorite is not a kind of a Celtic. sent16: the meteorite is a Amharic that is not a Signora. sent17: the Land is not a Amharic if the meteorite is a kind of a Celtic and it is a Signora. sent18: if something is not a half-mast then that it is not a sass and it is not a diestock does not hold. sent19: the fact that the dishwater prefigures arresting and is a half-mast is not correct if something is not autotrophic. sent20: the meteorite is a Amharic. | ¬({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) | sent1: {G}{d} -> {G}{c} sent2: {G}{c} -> ¬(¬{F}{c} & ¬{E}{c}) sent3: (x): {A}x -> ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) sent4: ¬{J}{g} sent5: ¬{AA}{cl} sent6: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬({GA}x & ¬{B}x) sent7: (x): ¬(¬{G}x & ¬{I}x) -> {G}{d} sent8: ({AB}{b} & ¬{AA}{b}) -> ¬{B}{a} sent9: (¬{A}{a} & {D}{a}) -> ¬{A}{hh} sent10: ({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{b} sent11: ¬({K}{f} & {H}{f}) -> ¬{H}{e} sent12: ¬{C}{b} -> (¬{A}{a} & {D}{a}) sent13: {B}{b} sent14: {AB}{b} sent15: ({B}{b} & ¬{AA}{b}) -> ¬{AB}{a} sent16: ({AA}{a} & ¬{B}{a}) sent17: ({AB}{a} & {B}{a}) -> ¬{AA}{b} sent18: (x): ¬{H}x -> ¬(¬{G}x & ¬{I}x) sent19: (x): ¬{J}x -> ¬({K}{f} & {H}{f}) sent20: {AA}{a} | [
"void -> assump1: Let's assume that the meteorite is a kind of Amharic thing that is not a kind of a Celtic.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the Land is not a kind of a Signora.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | [
"void -> assump1: ({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}); sent10 & assump1 -> int1: ¬{B}{b}; int1 & sent13 -> int2: #F#; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | 3 | 3 | 18 | 0 | 18 | the fact that the tonsure is random but not a Signora is wrong. | ¬({GA}{hh} & ¬{B}{hh}) | 13 | [
"sent6 -> int3: that that the tonsure is random thing that is not the Signora is wrong if the tonsure is not a CT is not false.; sent18 -> int4: if the quasar is not a half-mast the fact that it does not sass and it is not a diestock is not true.; sent4 -> int5: that something is not autotrophic is not false.; int5 & sent19 -> int6: that the dishwater prefigures arresting and it is a half-mast is wrong.; sent11 & int6 -> int7: the quasar is not a half-mast.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the fact that the quasar does not sass and it is not a diestock is not right.; int8 -> int9: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a sass and it is not a diestock is false.; int9 & sent7 -> int10: the sociolinguist is a kind of a sass.; sent1 & int10 -> int11: the cornhusk is a sass.; sent2 & int11 -> int12: that the cornhusk is not a kind of a downtown and it does not commingle raree-show is not right.; int12 -> int13: there is something such that that it is a kind of non-downtown thing that does not commingle raree-show does not hold.;"
] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the fact that the meteorite is both not non-Amharic and not Celtic is false. ; $context$ = sent1: the cornhusk is a sass if the sociolinguist is a sass. sent2: if that the cornhusk is a kind of a sass is right then the fact that that it is not a kind of a downtown and does not commingle raree-show is correct is not correct. sent3: something that is a CT is a Amharic that is not Celtic. sent4: the woad is not autotrophic. sent5: the breadfruit is not a kind of a Amharic. sent6: that something is random but it is not a Signora is false if that it is not a kind of a CT is right. sent7: the sociolinguist does sass if there is something such that that it is both not a sass and not a diestock is incorrect. sent8: if the Land is a Celtic but it is not Amharic then the meteorite is not a kind of a Signora. sent9: if the meteorite is not a kind of a CT but it is hypophyseal the tonsure is not a CT. sent10: if the meteorite is not non-Amharic but it is not a Celtic the Land is not a kind of a Signora. sent11: the quasar is not a half-mast if that the dishwater does prefigure arresting and is a kind of a half-mast does not hold. sent12: that the meteorite is not a CT but it is hypophyseal hold if the Land is not parametric. sent13: the Land is a Signora. sent14: the Land is Celtic. sent15: if the Land is a Signora but not Amharic then the meteorite is not a kind of a Celtic. sent16: the meteorite is a Amharic that is not a Signora. sent17: the Land is not a Amharic if the meteorite is a kind of a Celtic and it is a Signora. sent18: if something is not a half-mast then that it is not a sass and it is not a diestock does not hold. sent19: the fact that the dishwater prefigures arresting and is a half-mast is not correct if something is not autotrophic. sent20: the meteorite is a Amharic. ; $proof$ = | void -> assump1: Let's assume that the meteorite is a kind of Amharic thing that is not a kind of a Celtic.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the Land is not a kind of a Signora.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ | DeductionInstance | if the meteorite is not non-Amharic but it is not a Celtic the Land is not a kind of a Signora. | [
"the Land is a Signora."
] | [
"if the meteorite is not non-Amharic but it is not a Celtic the Land is not a kind of a Signora."
] |
the fact that the crying is educational is not incorrect. | sent1: the patchcord is a kind of a procyclidine if the curve is a Union. sent2: if the crying does prefigure whitewash then the fact that it is educational and does not prize doggerel is wrong. sent3: the crying is not educational if it does prize doggerel and it is eugenic. sent4: if the patchcord is not eugenic then the crying is a kind of educational thing that does not prefigure Livingston. sent5: if the patchcord does prefigure whitewash then the crying does prefigure whitewash. sent6: the whitewash is educational. sent7: the crying wipes. sent8: the crying prizes doggerel. sent9: the crying is a suborder. sent10: the countinghouse is not eugenic. sent11: the crying does prefigure Livingston. sent12: The doggerel prizes crying. sent13: the crying is a kind of a Ur that is a putrefaction. sent14: a procyclidine prefigures whitewash. sent15: the crying does prefigure Livingston and is eugenic. | {D}{a} | sent1: {G}{c} -> {F}{b} sent2: {E}{a} -> ¬({D}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) sent3: ({C}{a} & {B}{a}) -> ¬{D}{a} sent4: ¬{B}{b} -> ({D}{a} & ¬{A}{a}) sent5: {E}{b} -> {E}{a} sent6: {D}{ei} sent7: {HU}{a} sent8: {C}{a} sent9: {FT}{a} sent10: ¬{B}{ch} sent11: {A}{a} sent12: {AA}{aa} sent13: ({BI}{a} & {EO}{a}) sent14: (x): {F}x -> {E}x sent15: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) | [
"sent15 -> int1: the crying is eugenic.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the crying prizes doggerel and it is eugenic.; int2 & sent3 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | [
"sent15 -> int1: {B}{a}; int1 & sent8 -> int2: ({C}{a} & {B}{a}); int2 & sent3 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | 3 | 3 | 12 | 0 | 12 | the crying is educational. | {D}{a} | 5 | [] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the fact that the crying is educational is not incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the patchcord is a kind of a procyclidine if the curve is a Union. sent2: if the crying does prefigure whitewash then the fact that it is educational and does not prize doggerel is wrong. sent3: the crying is not educational if it does prize doggerel and it is eugenic. sent4: if the patchcord is not eugenic then the crying is a kind of educational thing that does not prefigure Livingston. sent5: if the patchcord does prefigure whitewash then the crying does prefigure whitewash. sent6: the whitewash is educational. sent7: the crying wipes. sent8: the crying prizes doggerel. sent9: the crying is a suborder. sent10: the countinghouse is not eugenic. sent11: the crying does prefigure Livingston. sent12: The doggerel prizes crying. sent13: the crying is a kind of a Ur that is a putrefaction. sent14: a procyclidine prefigures whitewash. sent15: the crying does prefigure Livingston and is eugenic. ; $proof$ = | sent15 -> int1: the crying is eugenic.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the crying prizes doggerel and it is eugenic.; int2 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ | DeductionInstance | the crying does prefigure Livingston and is eugenic. | [
"the crying prizes doggerel.",
"the crying is not educational if it does prize doggerel and it is eugenic."
] | [
"Livingston is prefigured by crying and is a eugenic MzE MzE MzE MzE MzE MzE MzE MzE MzE MzE MzE MzE MzE MzE MzE MzE MzE MzE MzE MzE MzE MzE MzE MzE MzE MzE MzE MzE MzE MzE MzE MzE MzE MzE MzE MzE MzE MzE MzE MzE MzE MzE MzE MzE MzE MzE",
"Livingston is prefigured by the crying and is a eugenic MzE MzE MzE MzE MzE MzE MzE MzE MzE MzE MzE MzE MzE MzE MzE MzE MzE MzE MzE MzE MzE MzE MzE MzE MzE MzE MzE MzE MzE MzE MzE MzE MzE MzE MzE MzE MzE MzE MzE MzE MzE MzE MzE MzE MzE"
] |
the boost does not occur. | sent1: the unequalness happens. sent2: the fact that the boost does not occur is correct if the unequalness and the commingling dioxin occurs. sent3: the commingling dioxin does not occur if either the commingling Cuculidae does not occur or the commingling dioxin does not occur or both. sent4: the prizing kerchief does not occur. sent5: the commingling dioxin occurs. sent6: if the commingling dioxin does not occur that the commingling terazosin does not occur and the unequalness occurs hold. sent7: that the commingling dioxin does not occur and the unequalness does not occur prevents that the undynamicness happens. sent8: if the commingling dioxin does not occur then both the unequalness and the boost happens. sent9: the prawning occurs. sent10: the devoting happens and the felt occurs. | ¬{C} | sent1: {A} sent2: ({A} & {B}) -> ¬{C} sent3: (¬{D} v ¬{B}) -> ¬{B} sent4: ¬{II} sent5: {B} sent6: ¬{B} -> (¬{AI} & {A}) sent7: (¬{B} & ¬{A}) -> ¬{IC} sent8: ¬{B} -> ({A} & {C}) sent9: {GO} sent10: ({IH} & {GH}) | [
"sent1 & sent5 -> int1: the unequalness happens and the commingling dioxin happens.; sent2 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | [
"sent1 & sent5 -> int1: ({A} & {B}); sent2 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | 2 | 2 | 7 | 0 | 7 | that the commingling terazosin does not occur hold. | ¬{AI} | 6 | [] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the boost does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the unequalness happens. sent2: the fact that the boost does not occur is correct if the unequalness and the commingling dioxin occurs. sent3: the commingling dioxin does not occur if either the commingling Cuculidae does not occur or the commingling dioxin does not occur or both. sent4: the prizing kerchief does not occur. sent5: the commingling dioxin occurs. sent6: if the commingling dioxin does not occur that the commingling terazosin does not occur and the unequalness occurs hold. sent7: that the commingling dioxin does not occur and the unequalness does not occur prevents that the undynamicness happens. sent8: if the commingling dioxin does not occur then both the unequalness and the boost happens. sent9: the prawning occurs. sent10: the devoting happens and the felt occurs. ; $proof$ = | sent1 & sent5 -> int1: the unequalness happens and the commingling dioxin happens.; sent2 & int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ | DeductionInstance | the unequalness happens. | [
"the commingling dioxin occurs.",
"the fact that the boost does not occur is correct if the unequalness and the commingling dioxin occurs."
] | [
"The disparity happens.",
"It happens."
] |
the fact that the balk either is vertebrate or does prefigure odium or both does not hold. | sent1: the balk is fiscal. sent2: the balk is not fiscal if the crossbar is not nonvolatile or it prefigures phlebotomus or both. sent3: that that the scribble is not a Mauritanian and it is not a kind of a squat is right is not true if it is an airbus. sent4: the balk is baptismal or does carouse or both. sent5: something does not prefigure phlebotomus if the fact that it is a Zealot and is not nonvolatile is not right. sent6: the balk does prefigure odium if that it is fiscal is not false. sent7: the heretic is either downmarket or fiscal or both. sent8: something is a Hutu if that it is not a kind of a Mauritanian and it is not a kind of a squat is wrong. sent9: the chain-smoker does prize consumer if it is a kind of a vertebrate. sent10: that the balk is a taxpayer is not wrong if it is not non-fiscal. sent11: something that is not a squat is a Hutu and/or a Zealot. sent12: if the scribble is a Hutu the fact that the crossbar is a Zealot but it is not nonvolatile is wrong. sent13: the crossbar is not nonvolatile if the scribble is nonvolatile. sent14: that something is a vertebrate and/or it prefigures odium is not true if it is not fiscal. sent15: the needlework is not a squat if the thriftshop is a kind of non-Mauritanian thing that is an airbus. | ¬({C}{a} v {B}{a}) | sent1: {A}{a} sent2: (¬{E}{b} v {D}{b}) -> ¬{A}{a} sent3: {J}{c} -> ¬(¬{I}{c} & ¬{H}{c}) sent4: ({DF}{a} v {FD}{a}) sent5: (x): ¬({F}x & ¬{E}x) -> ¬{D}x sent6: {A}{a} -> {B}{a} sent7: ({FE}{ge} v {A}{ge}) sent8: (x): ¬(¬{I}x & ¬{H}x) -> {G}x sent9: {C}{bm} -> {CO}{bm} sent10: {A}{a} -> {DQ}{a} sent11: (x): ¬{H}x -> ({G}x v {F}x) sent12: {G}{c} -> ¬({F}{b} & ¬{E}{b}) sent13: {E}{c} -> ¬{E}{b} sent14: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬({C}x v {B}x) sent15: (¬{I}{e} & {J}{e}) -> ¬{H}{d} | [
"sent6 & sent1 -> int1: the balk prefigures odium.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | [
"sent6 & sent1 -> int1: {B}{a}; int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | 2 | 2 | 13 | 0 | 13 | the charlotte is vertebrate. | {C}{hn} | 7 | [
"sent5 -> int2: the crossbar does not prefigure phlebotomus if that it is a Zealot that is not nonvolatile does not hold.; sent8 -> int3: if that the scribble is not a Mauritanian and is not a squat does not hold it is a kind of a Hutu.;"
] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the fact that the balk either is vertebrate or does prefigure odium or both does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the balk is fiscal. sent2: the balk is not fiscal if the crossbar is not nonvolatile or it prefigures phlebotomus or both. sent3: that that the scribble is not a Mauritanian and it is not a kind of a squat is right is not true if it is an airbus. sent4: the balk is baptismal or does carouse or both. sent5: something does not prefigure phlebotomus if the fact that it is a Zealot and is not nonvolatile is not right. sent6: the balk does prefigure odium if that it is fiscal is not false. sent7: the heretic is either downmarket or fiscal or both. sent8: something is a Hutu if that it is not a kind of a Mauritanian and it is not a kind of a squat is wrong. sent9: the chain-smoker does prize consumer if it is a kind of a vertebrate. sent10: that the balk is a taxpayer is not wrong if it is not non-fiscal. sent11: something that is not a squat is a Hutu and/or a Zealot. sent12: if the scribble is a Hutu the fact that the crossbar is a Zealot but it is not nonvolatile is wrong. sent13: the crossbar is not nonvolatile if the scribble is nonvolatile. sent14: that something is a vertebrate and/or it prefigures odium is not true if it is not fiscal. sent15: the needlework is not a squat if the thriftshop is a kind of non-Mauritanian thing that is an airbus. ; $proof$ = | sent6 & sent1 -> int1: the balk prefigures odium.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ | DeductionInstance | the balk does prefigure odium if that it is fiscal is not false. | [
"the balk is fiscal."
] | [
"the balk does prefigure odium if that it is fiscal is not false."
] |
that the retraction does not occur and the Monopoly happens is false. | sent1: if the inspectorship does not occur that the retraction does not occur but the Monopoly occurs is not true. sent2: either the commingling saunter happens or the prizing hailstone does not occur or both if the fact that the formulation does not occur hold. sent3: the fact that the parentalness but not the slumping occurs is not true if the steroidalness happens. sent4: if the drizzle does not occur then the inspectorship occurs or the retraction happens or both. sent5: that the drizzle happens hold if the commingling lupine does not occur and the thoughtfulness does not occur. sent6: the cryptobioticness does not occur. sent7: the commingling lupine does not occur if the fact that both the detonating and the bartering happens does not hold. sent8: the misfeasance and the non-cryptobioticness occurs. sent9: the panting happens but the adscriptness does not occur. sent10: the retraction does not occur if the misfeasance and the non-cryptobioticness occurs. sent11: if the brachiopod happens the fact that the commingling lupine does not occur and the thoughtfulness does not occur is not correct. sent12: the prefiguring vagrancy happens. sent13: that the steroidalness does not occur is prevented by that the sericulture happens. sent14: the Monopoly and the inspectorship occurs. sent15: the inspectorship happens. sent16: the retraction is prevented by that the misfeasance and the cryptobioticness occurs. sent17: the fingerlessness does not occur. sent18: if that the parentalness happens but the slumping does not occur does not hold the parentalness does not occur. sent19: that the detonating happens and the bartering occurs is false if the parentalness does not occur. sent20: the inspectorship does not occur if the drizzling occurs. sent21: if the fact that the commingling lupine does not occur and the thoughtfulness does not occur is not correct then the drizzling does not occur. | ¬(¬{B} & {A}) | sent1: ¬{C} -> ¬(¬{B} & {A}) sent2: ¬{Q} -> ({P} v ¬{O}) sent3: {M} -> ¬({K} & ¬{L}) sent4: ¬{D} -> ({C} v {B}) sent5: (¬{F} & ¬{E}) -> {D} sent6: ¬{AB} sent7: ¬({J} & {I}) -> ¬{F} sent8: ({AA} & ¬{AB}) sent9: ({EF} & ¬{GC}) sent10: ({AA} & ¬{AB}) -> ¬{B} sent11: {G} -> ¬(¬{F} & ¬{E}) sent12: {JD} sent13: {N} -> {M} sent14: ({A} & {C}) sent15: {C} sent16: ({AA} & {AB}) -> ¬{B} sent17: ¬{GD} sent18: ¬({K} & ¬{L}) -> ¬{K} sent19: ¬{K} -> ¬({J} & {I}) sent20: {D} -> ¬{C} sent21: ¬(¬{F} & ¬{E}) -> ¬{D} | [
"sent10 & sent8 -> int1: the retraction does not occur.; sent14 -> int2: that the Monopoly occurs hold.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | [
"sent10 & sent8 -> int1: ¬{B}; sent14 -> int2: {A}; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | DISPROVED | 2 | 2 | 18 | 0 | 18 | the give happens and the gorging happens. | ({EE} & {GQ}) | 7 | [] | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = that the retraction does not occur and the Monopoly happens is false. ; $context$ = sent1: if the inspectorship does not occur that the retraction does not occur but the Monopoly occurs is not true. sent2: either the commingling saunter happens or the prizing hailstone does not occur or both if the fact that the formulation does not occur hold. sent3: the fact that the parentalness but not the slumping occurs is not true if the steroidalness happens. sent4: if the drizzle does not occur then the inspectorship occurs or the retraction happens or both. sent5: that the drizzle happens hold if the commingling lupine does not occur and the thoughtfulness does not occur. sent6: the cryptobioticness does not occur. sent7: the commingling lupine does not occur if the fact that both the detonating and the bartering happens does not hold. sent8: the misfeasance and the non-cryptobioticness occurs. sent9: the panting happens but the adscriptness does not occur. sent10: the retraction does not occur if the misfeasance and the non-cryptobioticness occurs. sent11: if the brachiopod happens the fact that the commingling lupine does not occur and the thoughtfulness does not occur is not correct. sent12: the prefiguring vagrancy happens. sent13: that the steroidalness does not occur is prevented by that the sericulture happens. sent14: the Monopoly and the inspectorship occurs. sent15: the inspectorship happens. sent16: the retraction is prevented by that the misfeasance and the cryptobioticness occurs. sent17: the fingerlessness does not occur. sent18: if that the parentalness happens but the slumping does not occur does not hold the parentalness does not occur. sent19: that the detonating happens and the bartering occurs is false if the parentalness does not occur. sent20: the inspectorship does not occur if the drizzling occurs. sent21: if the fact that the commingling lupine does not occur and the thoughtfulness does not occur is not correct then the drizzling does not occur. ; $proof$ = | sent10 & sent8 -> int1: the retraction does not occur.; sent14 -> int2: that the Monopoly occurs hold.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ | DeductionInstance | the retraction does not occur if the misfeasance and the non-cryptobioticness occurs. | [
"the misfeasance and the non-cryptobioticness occurs.",
"the Monopoly and the inspectorship occurs."
] | [
"If the misfeasance and non-cryptobioticness occur, the retraction won't happen.",
"If the non-cryptobioticness and misfeasance occur, the retraction won't happen."
] |
there is something such that if that it does not take and it is not a kind of a gempylid does not hold then it is a stonefly. | sent1: there is something such that if the fact that it does take and is not a kind of a gempylid is incorrect then the fact that it is a stonefly is not wrong. sent2: the sheepskin is a kind of a stonefly if it takes. sent3: if that something is not a kind of a Assamese and it is not eruptive is incorrect then it is a kind of a stonefly. sent4: there exists something such that if it is not cleistogamous and it does not force Hazardia it is a kind of a walk-in. sent5: if the fact that the sheepskin is not a take and it is not a gempylid is wrong then it is a stonefly. sent6: there exists something such that if it takes then it is a stonefly. | (Ex): ¬(¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> {B}x | sent1: (Ex): ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> {B}x sent2: {AA}{aa} -> {B}{aa} sent3: (x): ¬(¬{IJ}x & ¬{DL}x) -> {B}x sent4: (Ex): (¬{DB}x & ¬{FA}x) -> {FC}x sent5: ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa} sent6: (Ex): {AA}x -> {B}x | [
"sent5 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | [
"sent5 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | 1 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 5 | the quadruplicate is a kind of a stonefly if that it is non-Assamese thing that is not eruptive is wrong. | ¬(¬{IJ}{ji} & ¬{DL}{ji}) -> {B}{ji} | 1 | [
"sent3 -> hypothesis;"
] | PROVED | PROVED | $hypothesis$ = there is something such that if that it does not take and it is not a kind of a gempylid does not hold then it is a stonefly. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if the fact that it does take and is not a kind of a gempylid is incorrect then the fact that it is a stonefly is not wrong. sent2: the sheepskin is a kind of a stonefly if it takes. sent3: if that something is not a kind of a Assamese and it is not eruptive is incorrect then it is a kind of a stonefly. sent4: there exists something such that if it is not cleistogamous and it does not force Hazardia it is a kind of a walk-in. sent5: if the fact that the sheepskin is not a take and it is not a gempylid is wrong then it is a stonefly. sent6: there exists something such that if it takes then it is a stonefly. ; $proof$ = | sent5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ | DeductionInstance | if the fact that the sheepskin is not a take and it is not a gempylid is wrong then it is a stonefly. | [] | [
"if the fact that the sheepskin is not a take and it is not a gempylid is wrong then it is a stonefly."
] |