|
--- |
|
license: apache-2.0 |
|
--- |
|
|
|
# FRAMES: Factuality, Retrieval, And reasoning MEasurement Set |
|
|
|
FRAMES is a comprehensive evaluation dataset designed to test the capabilities of Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems across factuality, retrieval accuracy, and reasoning. |
|
|
|
## Dataset Overview |
|
|
|
- 824 challenging multi-hop questions requiring information from 2-15 Wikipedia articles |
|
- Questions span diverse topics including history, sports, science, animals, health, etc. |
|
- Each question is labeled with reasoning types: numerical, tabular, multiple constraints, temporal, and post-processing |
|
- Gold answers and relevant Wikipedia articles provided for each question |
|
|
|
## Key Features |
|
|
|
- Tests end-to-end RAG capabilities in a unified framework |
|
- Requires integration of information from multiple sources |
|
- Incorporates complex reasoning and temporal disambiguation |
|
- Designed to be challenging for state-of-the-art language models |
|
|
|
## Usage |
|
|
|
This dataset can be used to: |
|
- Evaluate RAG system performance |
|
- Benchmark language model factuality and reasoning |
|
- Develop and test multi-hop retrieval strategies |
|
|
|
## Baseline Results |
|
|
|
We provide baseline results using state-of-the-art models like Gemini-Pro-1.5-0514: |
|
|
|
- Naive prompting: 40.8% accuracy |
|
- BM25 retrieval (4 docs): 47.4% accuracy |
|
- Oracle retrieval: 72.9% accuracy |
|
- Multi-step retrieval & reasoning: 66% accuracy |
|
|
|
## Citation |
|
|
|
If you use this dataset in your research, please cite our paper: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We hope FRAMES will be useful for advancing RAG systems and language model capabilities. For more details, please refer to our full paper. |
