xlm-roberta-base-language-detection

This model is a fine-tuned version of xlm-roberta-base on the Language Identification dataset.

Model description

This model is an XLM-RoBERTa transformer model with a classification head on top (i.e. a linear layer on top of the pooled output). For additional information please refer to the xlm-roberta-base model card or to the paper Unsupervised Cross-lingual Representation Learning at Scale by Conneau et al.

Intended uses & limitations

You can directly use this model as a language detector, i.e. for sequence classification tasks. Currently, it supports the following 20 languages:

arabic (ar), bulgarian (bg), german (de), modern greek (el), english (en), spanish (es), french (fr), hindi (hi), italian (it), japanese (ja), dutch (nl), polish (pl), portuguese (pt), russian (ru), swahili (sw), thai (th), turkish (tr), urdu (ur), vietnamese (vi), and chinese (zh)

Training and evaluation data

The model was fine-tuned on the Language Identification dataset, which consists of text sequences in 20 languages. The training set contains 70k samples, while the validation and test sets 10k each. The average accuracy on the test set is 99.6% (this matches the average macro/weighted F1-score being the test set perfectly balanced). A more detailed evaluation is provided by the following table.

Language	Precision	Recall	F1-score	support
ar	0.998	0.996	0.997	500
bg	0.998	0.964	0.981	500
de	0.998	0.996	0.997	500
el	0.996	1.000	0.998	500
en	1.000	1.000	1.000	500
es	0.967	1.000	0.983	500
fr	1.000	1.000	1.000	500
hi	0.994	0.992	0.993	500
it	1.000	0.992	0.996	500
ja	0.996	0.996	0.996	500
nl	1.000	1.000	1.000	500
pl	1.000	1.000	1.000	500
pt	0.988	1.000	0.994	500
ru	1.000	0.994	0.997	500
sw	1.000	1.000	1.000	500
th	1.000	0.998	0.999	500
tr	0.994	0.992	0.993	500
ur	1.000	1.000	1.000	500
vi	0.992	1.000	0.996	500
zh	1.000	1.000	1.000	500

Benchmarks

As a baseline to compare xlm-roberta-base-language-detection against, we have used the Python langid library. Since it comes pre-trained on 97 languages, we have used its .set_languages() method to constrain the language set to our 20 languages. The average accuracy of langid on the test set is 98.5%. More details are provided by the table below.

Language	Precision	Recall	F1-score	support
ar	0.990	0.970	0.980	500
bg	0.998	0.964	0.981	500
de	0.992	0.944	0.967	500
el	1.000	0.998	0.999	500
en	1.000	1.000	1.000	500
es	1.000	0.968	0.984	500
fr	0.996	1.000	0.998	500
hi	0.949	0.976	0.963	500
it	0.990	0.980	0.985	500
ja	0.927	0.988	0.956	500
nl	0.980	1.000	0.990	500
pl	0.986	0.996	0.991	500
pt	0.950	0.996	0.973	500
ru	0.996	0.974	0.985	500
sw	1.000	1.000	1.000	500
th	1.000	0.996	0.998	500
tr	0.990	0.968	0.979	500
ur	0.998	0.996	0.997	500
vi	0.971	0.990	0.980	500
zh	1.000	1.000	1.000	500

Training procedure

Fine-tuning was done via the Trainer API.

Training hyperparameters

The following hyperparameters were used during training:

learning_rate: 2e-05
train_batch_size: 64
eval_batch_size: 128
seed: 42
optimizer: Adam with betas=(0.9,0.999) and epsilon=1e-08
lr_scheduler_type: linear
num_epochs: 2
mixed_precision_training: Native AMP

Training results

The validation results on the valid split of the Language Identification dataset are summarised here below.

Training Loss	Epoch	Step	Validation Loss	Accuracy	F1
0.2492	1.0	1094	0.0149	0.9969	0.9969
0.0101	2.0	2188	0.0103	0.9977	0.9977

In short, it achieves the following results on the validation set:

Loss: 0.0101
Accuracy: 0.9977
F1: 0.9977

Framework versions

Transformers 4.12.5
Pytorch 1.10.0+cu111
Datasets 1.15.1
Tokenizers 0.10.3

eleldar
/

language-detection