ragarwal/factual-consistency-t5-large

Original Repo

Paper

Inference script available here

Data:

• Training Data
• Evaluation Benchmark

Results

Method	Rank	Mean Win Rate (%)	Average AUC
Llama-3-8B (FT) (Ours)	1	78.11	78.037
Flan-T5-L (FT) (Ours)	2	76.43	78.663
MiniCheck-T5-L	3	72.39	76.674
gpt-3.5-turbo	4	69.36	77.007
Flan-T5-B (FT) (Ours)	5	66.00	76.126
AlignScore-L	6	53.19	73.074
Llama-3-8B	7	53.20	75.085
AlignScore-B	8	39.39	71.319
QuestEval	9	37.37	66.089
BARTScore	10	26.94	62.637
BERTScore	11	20.88	61.263
ROUGE-L	12	6.73	54.678

Comparison of different factuality evaluation methods across all test datasets. The methods are ranked based on the Mean Win Rate, which measures overall performance on factuality tasks. The Average AUC column represents the average of all individual AUC-ROC scores.

Cite this work as follows:

@misc{agarwal2024zeroshotfactualconsistencyevaluation,
      title={Zero-shot Factual Consistency Evaluation Across Domains}, 
      author={Raunak Agarwal},
      year={2024},
      eprint={2408.04114},
      archivePrefix={arXiv},
      primaryClass={cs.CL},
      url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.04114}, 
}