Spaces:

CONDA-Workshop

/

Data-Contamination-Database

like 16

Running

What are you reporting:

• Evaluation dataset(s) found in a pre-training corpus. (e.g. COPA found in ThePile)
• Evaluation dataset(s) found in a pre-trained model. (e.g. FLAN T5 has been trained on ANLI)

Evaluation dataset(s): Name(s) of the evaluation dataset(s). If available in the HuggingFace Hub please write the path (e.g. uonlp/CulturaX), otherwise provide a link to a paper, GitHub or dataset-card.

• imdb
• ag_news
• yelp_review_full
• nyu-mll/glue (rte)
• nyu-mll/glue (wnli)
• samsum
• EdinburghNLP/xsum
• openai_humaneval
• ucinlp/drop
• gsm8k

Contaminated model(s): Name of the model(s) (if any) that have been contaminated with the evaluation dataset. If available in the HuggingFace Hub please list the corresponding paths (e.g. allenai/OLMo-7B).

• GPT-4
• GPT-3.5

Contaminated corpora: N/A

Contaminated split(s): If the dataset has Train, Development and/or Test splits please report the contaminated split(s). You can report a percentage of the dataset contaminated; if the entire dataset is compromised, report 100%.

• imdb/test: {GPT-4: 82.00, GPT-3.5: 55.00}
• ag_news/test: {GPT-4: 91.00, GPT-3.5: 82.00}
• yelp_review_full/test: {GPT-4: 80.00, GPT-3.5: 13.00}
• nyu-mll/glue (rte)/validation: {GPT-4: 60.00, GPT-3.5: 71.00}
• nyu-mll/glue (wnli)/validation: {GPT-4: 50.70, GPT-3.5: 12.68}
• samsum/test: {GPT-4: 77.00, GPT-3.5: 74.00}
• EdinburghNLP/xsum/test: {GPT-4: 95.00, GPT-3.5: 79.00}
• openai_humaneval/test: {GPT-4: 56.71}
• ucinlp/drop/validation: {GPT-4: 44.00}
• gsm8k/train: {GPT-4: 79.00}

You may also report instances where there is no contamination. In such cases, follow the previous instructions but report a contamination level of 0%.

Briefly describe your method to detect data contamination

• Data-based approach
• Model-based approach

Description of your method, 3-4 sentences. Evidence of data contamination (Read below):

The results are based on the findings of Golchin and Surdeanu, 2023, where they assessed contamination levels using a quiz-based method. This quiz directs an LLM to pick an option containing the original dataset instance from its three word-level perturbations. If the LLM successfully identifies the original dataset instance, it shows the LLM's exposure to the data. Lastly, the quiz performance represents the level of detected contamination within a specific dataset partition for the LLM that administered the quiz.

Citation

Is there a paper that reports the data contamination or describes the method used to detect data contamination?

URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.06233
Citation:

@article

	{DBLP:journals/corr/abs-2311-06233,
  author       = {Shahriar Golchin and
                  Mihai Surdeanu},
  title        = {Data Contamination Quiz: {A} Tool to Detect and Estimate Contamination
                  in Large Language Models},
  journal      = {CoRR},
  volume       = {abs/2311.06233},
  year         = {2023},
  url          = {https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2311.06233},
  doi          = {10.48550/ARXIV.2311.06233},
  eprinttype    = {arXiv},
  eprint       = {2311.06233},
  timestamp    = {Wed, 15 Nov 2023 16:23:10 +0100},
  biburl       = {https://dblp.org/rec/journals/corr/abs-2311-06233.bib},
  bibsource    = {dblp computer science bibliography, https://dblp.org}
}

Important! If you wish to be listed as an author in the final report, please complete this information for all the authors of this Pull Request.

• Full name: Shahriar Golchin, Mihai Surdeanu
• Institution: University of Arizona
• Email: golchin@arizona.edu; msurdeanu@arizona.edu