Even this model still struggle with simple logic.
😃: In a room I have only 3 sisters.
Anna is reading a book
Alice is playing a match of chess
What the third sister, Amanda is doing ?
🤖: Since you mentioned only 3 sisters and provided activities for Anna and Alice, it is safe to assume that the third sister, Amanda, is also doing something. However, without any additional information about Amanda's actions, I cannot tell you what she is doing.
😃: Alice is playing a match of chess against someone in the room.
🤖: In that case, Amanda might be observing or possibly playing a different game or doing something else not mentioned. Without more information, it's impossible to say with certainty what Amanda is doing.
As presented, the input is a bit ambiguous.
I added more information on the context for the model, as well as a chain-of-thought suffix:
😃 A riddle:
In a room are only 3 people, all sisters.
Anna is reading a book.
Alice is playing a match of chess.
What is the third sister, Amanda doing ?
I assure you there is enough information present to answer conclusively with her specific activity.
Please be sure to think this out step by step to be sure you get the right answer!
🤖 The third sister, Amanda, is playing a match of chess.
Here's the reasoning:
Anna is reading a book.
Alice is playing a match of chess.
Since there are only three sisters in the room, and Anna and Alice have already been accounted for, the only remaining sister must be Amanda.
Since Amanda is the only sister left, she must be doing the activity that Alice is doing, which is playing a match of chess.