leaderboard / LEADERBOARD.md
Jae-Won Chung
Add License statement
82141cb
|
raw
history blame
3.34 kB

The goal of the ML.ENERGY Leaderboard is to give people a sense of how much energy LLMs would consume.

How is energy different?

Even between models with the exact same architecture and size, the average energy consumption per prompt is different because they have different verbosity. That is, when asked the same thing, they answer in different lengths.

Metrics

  • gpu: NVIDIA GPU model name
  • task: Name of the task. See Tasks below for details.
  • throughput (token/s): The average number of tokens generated per second.
  • response_length (token): The average number of tokens in the model's response.
  • latency (s): The average time it took for the model to generate a response.
  • energy (J): The average energy consumed by the model to generate a response.
  • parameters: The number of parameters the model has, in units of billion.

Tasks

For each task, every model uses the same system prompt. We still account for differences in roles, e.g. USER, HUMAN, ASSISTANT, GPT.

Name System prompt
chat A chat between a human user (prompter) and an artificial intelligence (AI) assistant. The assistant gives helpful, detailed, and polite answers to the user's questions.
chat-concise A chat between a human user (prompter) and an artificial intelligence (AI) assistant. The assistant gives helpful, detailed, and polite answers to the user's questions. The assistant's answers are very concise.
instruct Below is an instruction that describes a task. Write a response that appropriately completes the request.
instruct-concise Below is an instruction that describes a task. Write a response that appropriately completes the request. The response should be very concise.

Setup

Find our benchmark script for one model here.

Software

  • PyTorch 2.0.1
  • FastChat -- For various model support
  • Zeus -- For GPU energy measurement

Hardware

  • NVIDIA A40 GPU

Parameters

  • Model
    • Batch size 1
    • FP16
  • Sampling (decoding)
    • Greedy sampling from multinomial distribution
    • Temperature 0.7
    • Repetition penalty 1.0

Data

We randomly sampled around 3000 prompts from the cleaned ShareGPT dataset. See here for more detail on how we created the benchmark dataset.

We used identical system prompts for all models (while respecting their own role tokens):

A chat between a human user (prompter) and an artificial intelligence (AI) assistant. The assistant gives helpful, detailed, and polite answers to the user's questions.

Upcoming

  • Compare against more optimized inference runtimes, like TensorRT.
  • Other GPUs
  • Other model/sampling parameters
  • More models
  • Model quality evaluation numbers (e.g., AI2 Reasoning Challenge, HellaSwag)

License

This leaderboard is a research preview intended for non-commercial use only. The use of LLaMA weights are subject to their license. Please direct inquiries and reports of potential license/copyright violation to Jae-Won Chung.