Datasets:

Intuit-GenSRF

/

combined_toxicity_profanity_v2_eval_only

like 0

I don't suppose we can convince CJ DUB to like girls, can we? Nahhh!

why no e-mails? Hi Dick, Why no e-mail addresses in Wiki? G.

" Yipes! There wasn't anyone else's statement there when I wrote my statement - all I did was hit ""save""... "

Whoever banned me is a fucking idiot. Why didn't you ban the antisemites?

Wow! My thought experiment has gotten you all fired up, it seems. -) In the case of the Trouton-Noble experiment, all the interactions involved are electromagnetic interactions. So once a theoretician has granted that in the physics of electromagnetism the Lorentz transformations apply, things can be taken from there. Now, of course, Lorentz had to assume that a planet that is moving through the lorentzian ether is flattened in the direction of motion, just as everything else. That is a modification of how the force of gravity is transmitted. Coulomb force couples to electric charge, what does gravity couple to? But does the force of gravity couple to the rest mass, or to the total mass? If gravity couples only to the rest mass then the ether theory stands a chance of reproducing the prediction of the Einstein interpretation, as the rest mass is invariant under Lorentz transformation. But as far as we know gravitation involves the total mass. This is an illustration of the fact that in relativistic physics gravitation just bursts out of the confines of special relativity. Something has to give. This theme is similar, I think, to the theme in John Nortons paper about Nordström's Lorentz invariant scalar theory of gravitation; gravitation just bursts out of special relativity, and a successor to special relativity is needed. (And was provided by Einstein.) Poincaré's 1905 Palermo paper (facsimile reproduction, non-digital, 3 MB file) has a considerable section about gravitation. I'm not sure, but I don't think that Poincaré demands gravitational-inertial mass equivalence as a constraint on the theory. I think that if Poincaré had anticipated that light is deflected by gravitation, he would have written so. I think it was well after 1905 that recognition came that light does not only carry momentum, it also carries inertial mass. When light propagates from an emitter to a receiver, it not only transmits momentum, it also transmits inertial mass. The inertial mass of the emitter decreases on emission of the light, and the inertial mass of the receiver increases on absorption. Of

course, light has zero rest mass. Since light has zero rest mass, the natural assumption is that light is not affected by gravity. Possibly, considerations of this nature made Poincaré very, very cautious towards attributing inertial mass to energy. In his 1909 Göttingen lecture, Poincaré went very far in attributing the increased inertia of a fast-moving electron to increased energy of the ether surrounding the electron, in response to the high velocity of the electrons. Can that still work for muons and tauon's? My understanding is that electrons and muons are identical as far as electric charge and spin are concerned, but that they are different in rest mass. Should electrons and muons become more and more alike at higher velocities? To my knowledge: at all velocities the energy of muons is the muon's rest mass multiplied with the relativistic factor. I am indeed very curious how Lorentz dealt with these issues. As you indicate: historians of science describe that Lorentz retained a preference for using a lorentzian interpretation, but from the lectures Lorentz gave in the 1920ties it can be seen that Lorentz had full mathematical mastery of special and general relativity. | Talk

December 2009 (UTC) Well either way it seems this belongs in the article (preferably with better sources) 16:27, 6

Yeah, seriously. UCLA got away with tons of cheating, and still had the clout to get the NCAA to go after schools like Long Beach State for playing too many black starters.

" File:Russian visa on arrival.PNG missing description details Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Russian visa on arrival.PNG is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers. If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided. If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. "

Penny Stock Reversions Thanks for reverting/cleaning up some of the spam in the Penny stock article. I should've realized it would be a target for self-promoters and will try and watch it more frequently.

Islamophobia I am simply try even out pov... I am disturbed by the above comments... such jocularity is unbecoming... I only hope you do not engage in zina... >:(

Done and done. I think he'll be a good editor. Just had a little glitch at the start... Anyhoo, thanks for your input. .talk.contribs

Bold text I added another picture I added a picture of a more modern version of a trench coat. The kind without the numerable pockets and belt straps. Please leave the picture up, as this style of trench coat is continuing to be used and is gaining popularity, probably even surpassing the old style, which was more of a rain-coat.

" Replaceable fair use Image:Mishig_Sonompil.jpg Thanks for uploading Image:Mishig_Sonompil.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please: Go to the media description page and edit it to add , without deleting the original replaceable fair use template. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all. Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself. If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? "

ERIDU DREAMING, instead of posting long expositions of your belief system, could you please provide a source written by someone who calls themselves right-wing and explain what it means.

Fair enough. I'm glad that I was able to contribute to this topic. Cheers!

I am open to your idea, which I think is desist from merging, prrclrly the actvsm. There is some overlapping going on. Public health education should go. I will be working on the category awareness days, if it should be renamed, so be it, the topic interests me at the moment and i plan to list all the awareness days. Whats your advice?

Final note You are a melee mouthed internet addict who should get off his mutated Gluteus Maximus and aspire to something in life besides deleting edits on Wikipedia. And no, watching My Little Pony doesn't count.

" Hi Howard and all the rest of you guys Americans or d'ailleurs, I favor Howard's proposal of having an article to list all of the third-party participants in the Iran-Iraq War, not just a separate article for U.S. I was kidding when I said that adding U.S. to both sides would fix the infobox, but not kidding in the sense that if someone sticks U.S. in one side, the history shows U.S. should be in both sides. I am inclusionist with respect to the infobox and think that anybody who moved arms to either side should be included. All of this is hashed out ad naseum above but the new Iranian guy has kicked it all off again by throwing U.S. into the info box once again bringing us back into the grand and glorious infobox debate territory. Also there are two other guys (C-Suit and B-Louie) going into endless debates about a single Iranian war slogan (something like ""Onward, beans and bagels, fight fight fight for Palestine"" or something like that) that one insists is real and the other insists is invented but I can't for the life of me figure out why either of them considers it worthy of so much debate. Oh yes, the slogan is ""We will keep fighting until we win"". You'd hope so, don't you think? What else would they say, ""We will keep fighting until we stop fighting or whatever""? That would not be a very effective slogan! Is there some way we can combine the slogan debate and the infobox debate into one huge bonfire of nitpicking? I'd like that! Thanks, "

That was a joke, didnt you see the giant star i gave TheUltimate3. I did it too see if admins could revert more then 3 times. since no dam admins would tell me. you sound tough for someone who has only been here for 2 days. dont start with me!

Hi Binksternet, Follow Me (Hardwell song) was patrolled by Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars on 7 October 2015. I got an alert of that but when I went back into view the article, this person mustn't have removed the 'unreviewed' tag at the top, hence why I did it and left a message in the edits.

Pathetic This user needs a life

" Speedy deletion of Bearshockey254 A tag has been placed on Bearshockey254, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD g1. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. User:Veesicle "

Enjoying the creepy messages? Enjoying all these creepy messages son?

"Anybody got any nice free use photos to illustrate this article. Greenpeace's are all educational/free use, so can't use those, and shell are ""keen to move on..."" ( 17:19, 10 Mar 2005 (UTC)"

There are a few flood models: Hydroplate, Catastrophic plate tectonics (CPT), Asteroid impacts. (note: These flood models assume that the Genesis Flood is a fact.) The Hydroplate model has popular general public interest but few adherents among creationary scientists. Rains come from water ejected from below crust. Flooding is also by sinking of continents. CPT is promoted by some PhD creationary scientists, problems with it are noted by other equally degreed creationists. Flooding is by tsunami from oceans, rains are a side product. Asteroid impacts are credited in two models Asteroid impacts w/CPT and Asteroid impacts w/vertical tectonics. There are critics of both among creationary scientists. Flooding is by tsunami from oceans, rains are a side product. Discussions of these models are found in creationary publications, which are, of course, automatically rejected as FRINGE so....... So all you get are anti-creationists misrepresenting creationists and claiming this is what creationists say. No one cares what creationists actually say nor why. It's all automatically pseudoscience because everyone knows that creationism is pseudoscience. It doesn't matter if they are misrepresented or not. They're FRINGE freaks anyway....

That's nice, but this isn't a Keane chat room.

Demographic Chart Is it possible to get that in regular numbers? The n+03 or whatever it is there is confusing. 74.104.182.106

where you can get all the help needed for you to create a fine article. Promotional and badly written articles can't be on Wikipedia. Thank you and I hope you will contribute to Wikipedia according to the rules.

" scripts ""punchy dialogue""; ""witty""? How are the strings of smarmy self-satisfied quips and painfully melodramatic monologues that make up Dawson's Creek scripts in any way punchy or clever? I agree that the standards of 'POV' shouldn't be quite as high when arts or drama are being discussed (otherwise it's difficult to describe the thing in question) - but stupid POVs are too much. "

" Deleting other people's comments on talk pages Hi, please do not delete other people's comments from talk pages, even when they have been resolved, as you did . This page is set up to be automatically archived by when the thread reaches ten days from the last posting. The reason that these threads, which are older than that, have not yet been automatically archived is that MiszaBot I is also configured to leave a minimum of three threads on the page. "

trequests for adminship Two words - do it. I can't doubt that you would be successful.

" Thanks for your response. T "

Give me an answer and I will be satisfied for the next three decades!

":I agree that there might be a problem however, I generally agree with the changes made since Nov./05 and still do. Moreover, your above analysis et al. is not necessarily agreeable and glazes over usage of the term, which is no less valid or verifiable, that might differ from cited definitions which seem (IMO) incomplete and minimalist. For instance, an online search will reveal a number of instances of ""single(-)star system"" and I think it somewhat difficult to demonstrate they they too are incorrect. Even if those are discarded, applying this notion merely to systems with two or more stars (double, trinary) to the exclusion of single-star entities (e.g., the Solar System) seems rather illogical. Alternatively, the current article and definition/content is neither beyond the scope of the topic nor inaccurate. Thus, I defer to my prior comments: until there is overwhelming evidence to support this position (and I yet do not see it) or additional editorial comment, I see little reason to change the status quo. "

In which type of liquors, molasses is used?

Can non-admins not put a 3RR warning to Wiki users? Any reference?

I never expected my identity to be secret. My intention is what it's always been: Enlightening and civil intellectual discourse with the likes of Nicknack, only this time minus the futile attempts to knock any sort of sense into a trio of stubborn, narrow-minded and thick-skulled Admins. I realize that I'm not welcome here by you and two other Admins, and frankly, I couldn't care less. So do as you will. Try as you may to block Serinmort for no other reason than because you don't like him. Can it get any more ad hominem than that? Talk about a witch-hunt! And as I've learned quite well, there's nothing less popular than being perceived as an obsessive, vindictive, witch-hunter!

Why Ill leave it here because I do not want to embarrass you: we all as humans are inheritly non neutral. your edits such as this one is one of the reasons Ive decided to vote in the way I did, Your deletion had references to back it up, we could get into a whole theological discussion but that would prove futile I fear. to cut to the chase I think your delusioned, That does not mean your a bad person. My friend If you say Im banning you from Wikipedia because Im voting to Scientology topic ban you, you are on Wikipedia for the wrong reasons. I from now on will abandon the subject of your banning. I hope I have not offended you in any way thank you, That is enough explanation for a whole day The problem is: I did not delete your paragraph, even though I could have done it, per WP:BRD. Instead I MOVED it on the talk page to sit there until the media news story settled into some encyclopedic occurrence. Point is, Wikipedia is not a news source WP:NOT, so if there is something developing in the media we should wait until it has settled. That's why I moved it. Your argument is nil so I still do not understand why you are attacking me.

Deletion of Controversy section I deleted the controversy section. It is true that there are genuine academic disagreements as to the meaning and interpretation of Banaji's research. But that is true of any area of scientific research. The section I removed gave no specifics and provided no supporting citations, and so seemed to me to violated NPOV. If someone wants to expand with details of the controversies and their implications, it would be a welcome improvement to the article.

" Let us smile sends his [[Namaskar|greetings and friendly smile to you! I do believe that smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. I would request you to please spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding , or to their talk pages. Happy editing and all the best! "

this article better for deletion cause of no new stories on the page the actor doesnt even work on his old studio anymore and there where no real stories of the person only TUFF things there are still other better actors that make good stories of there media and really explain their real life

The only Anab I'm familiar with is the name of a town near Hebron in the Middle East. And here I had always misread the call name as Ahab.

I can't see why the arabesque spelling is even used at all. Arabesk, as it is discussed on this page and is considered in Turkey, is written arabesk and is not synonymous with French usage of arabesque. All the academic literature on the genre writes the genre as arabesk.

You are talking irrelevant bollocks. The 'first sentence of the page' describes Freud as 'Austrian neurologist who founded the psychoanalytic school of psychiatry': none of that has anything to do with the piffle you and the other fool decided to write.

Hi again; thanks for forgiving me i think the best thing to do is just edit a page if it needs imporving not to promot my websites. thanks and sorry again user:CJ2005B

"==Cool name.== 03:43, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC) I'll second that! BTW, thanks for the good edit on programming errors. About those subheadings... Regarding the change on Political spectrum. It says [] that tags can be used to keep items out of the table of contents. You're right here that they should be in the table; I had been used to using them alot for repetitive elements on another project. But I thought I would mention it. Scientology Good job on that NPOV rephrasing of the Helena Krobin section of Scientology. (Talk) Sockpuppet Hi there! You said the sockpuppet proposal could be reworded... please tell us how you'd like to reword it, thanks. adiant_* 11:25, May 13, 2005 (UTC) Wikipedia:Sock puppet/Proposal Hi there! I've reworded this a bit per everyone's comment, and would like to get support to make this a guideline and allow it to be used. Could you please indicate if you agree? If you want a rewording, please be bold. Thanks, adiant_* 12:30, May 19, 2005 (UTC) Woods Hole Thanks for taking care of that. I couldn't get to it when I noticed it today. Good work. 04:08, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC) Chlorophobia I found sources that it is a phobia however the info inside I could not source. It would be a better vfd candidate. I don't have time to list it now however. Sorry 30 June 2005 20:54 (UTC) Christianity You are funny, I see that. I wish it didn't have to be at the expense of others, *me* in this case. 9 July 2005 06:15 (UTC) Unusual spellings are funny. It's not meant personally. 9 July 2005 06:34 (UTC) It's not really that unusual. Template locations I have noticed you discussed template locations at Wikipedia talk:template messages. One user has unilaterally been moving templates from articles to talk pages en-masse (over 100 articles are affected during a spate made by the user last night). I have spent some time trying to resolve

this issue. There is now a poll discussing where templates belong created at Wikipedia:Template locations, and a discussion at Template talk:Expansion. Wikipedia:Template locations Hi, you voted for the AID-template to be on the talk page. Is there a specific reason why you discriminate against this project as compared to the almost identical COTW? If you would like to insist on the AID-template having specific different rules than the others, please tell us on the Wikipedia talk:Template locations. Spyware.png regarding your reversion of our edit to the the ""spyware"" page... Sorry if we didn't follow protocol. Is one expected to actually edit the graphic and/or correct the caption? May I trust that you are editing the graphic to correct the information? Thanks. I edited the caption, yes. I appreciate you editing the caption. I see that it now says ""Spyware and other toolbars"". I work on a team that is working on the Desktop.com toolbar that is included in the graphic. Would you not agree that the inclusion of our toolbar in the image that is displayed on the ""Spyware"" page impliesat the very leastthat our toolbar is Spyware? Our toolbar does nothing without the express permission of the user as spelled out in the EULA. We don't want an image of it included in an image meant to illustrate Spyware. Does that make sense? Thanks for your consideration. Respectfully, I understand your concern, and I agree that we should be careful not to imply that all of these toolbars are spyware. I can imagine that it's a particularly pointed issue in your case since the Desktop.com toolbar is at the top of the image. I can't speak to the specifics of your product after all, Gator and WhenU also claim that their prog

Welcome, I have tons more if you ever want to check. I am thinking of making a template for the sound editor winners as well.

" Club 177 A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Club 177, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also ""What Wikipedia is not"" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add to the top of Club 177. (talk | contributions) "

" I could never have come to China and had this same conversation with you. I'm Chinese. the name ""Canton"" is Chinese, and is ONLY Chinese. it has been morroewed into the English language, but will forever be Chinese. you cannot change that fact to give an aire of importance to yourself. the application of Canton to Guangzhou is confusing like the application of Florida might be to New York Canton doesn not mean Guangzhou in the same way that Florida cannot ever equal New York, though I'm sure there are people in the world who, like you and your forefathers, might try to mislabel out of sheer ignorance. Canton is a Chinese word. Get over it. Find your own word. Canton has one meaning, Guangdong. or are you simply unwilling to admit that your exploitive ancestors made a mistake and actually didnt even care about it or were so preoccupied with pushing opium for sex that didnt even bother to recognize such a blatently stupid mistake which was such an integral part of their lives. it doesnt surprise me, I know people who have been in China 20 years and are still as ignorant as they were when they first got here, and just as ignorant as their early forefathers were"

Additional school history information - year built, reason for building campus, etc.

" ""2 handed technique"": Information removed from article. Many bowlers in this new era have begun to adopt the 2 handed technique in order to maximize pin action. Pro bowlers Jeff Leiber and John Hopkins have revolutionized this new style sighting a noticable increase in ball speed and acuracy. PBA rules state as long as 2 fingers are in the holes, a second hand is allowed. Traditional one handed style is still used by most of the PBA field. I removed this information from the article. At the very least, it did not belong where it was. It also lacked citation and struck me as irrelevant. But perhaps this information is appropriate for this article, which is why I've moved it here. If the original contributor (User:Kwd357) wishes to replace it, I ask that it at least be placed somewhere more appropriate than in the lead-in paragraph. "

Legal formatting I'd be interested to know people's views on the formatting of some of this and other articles. I note that since I added detail a few years ago for example, someone had added 'plaintiff' rather than the more commonly used 'claimant', and rather than my explanation of a case which applied the rule in McGhee, simply stated 'applying'. Whilst I understand the law report format of this kind of change, I wonder if wikipedia should use such styles, or whether it should be more accessible? As such, I've adjusted 'plaintiff' to 'claimant' - though I have left the 'applying' and other stylistic points as they are.

" I know you are not a bigot, because I never see you at any of the meetings!I've asked on the thread on WP:AN if a filter might be possible to trap any change of ""Roman Catholic"" to ""Catholic"" by an IP editor. "

- for this comment - https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jimbo_Wales&diff;=prev&oldid;=630075681

" I was dicking around and still haven't figured out how to use Twinkle. I'll be back tomorrow and I won't have learned a damn thing except how angry you little people can get. I'm sorry I made a bad word on my own page but I obviously didn't know about all the rules yet. Had I been unbanned today I would probably have become a better user and tried to figure everything out before contributing again. However, since I can see that this is just a little war being waged because I contradicted the actions of a well-known wiki-user I'm just going to be angry tomorrow. Clearly this isn't actually about the ""personal attack"" I made on my talk page. Unban me and you create a wikiuser for life. Otherwise, I don't need this drama."

I don't think there are any male or female Yoshi(s)... the species seems to reproduce asexually. Besides, it's friggin' Mario, the canon is deliberately very loose and rarely gets in the way of gameplay. Besides, I think that the Yoshi's egglaying ability is an innovating evolutionary feature, combining with good throwing strength to create an excellent hunting/self-defence mechanism...

By the way, can I remove the accusation notice from my user page?

Please remove the edit restriction

See WP:WEB for guidelines for websites.

" OK, Please feel free to describe how the following is a personal attack, if you can support that accusation: It seems that many users have had problems with harassment and vandalism , why do you continually harass other users and then falsly accuse them of ""vandalism"" or other wiki-infringements? Please, do not delete this comment, I am only here as a mediator and this is NOT a personal attack. Only a simple question as to what motivates you to defame other users. Here are the examples that I have compiled since being introduced to this issue. We have who complains about your harassment on this talk page above. “I have not attacked you. Actually, quite the reverse. I have not exercized censorship. Quite the reverse. What's it called when you accuse others of being something that you actually are?” describes your actions as “rootless accusations of ""vandalism"" in response to my recent edit of the wikipedia article ""police state"" don't even pass the straight face test.” even took the time to write a letter to the administrators about your behavior. Dear Administrators:""I would like to file a complaint against user ""nescio"" for wanton vandalism of the article entitled ""Police State"". User Nescio has been deleting sections of the article he or she personally disagrees with e.g. historical police state examples "" Chile under the dictatorship of Augusto Pinochet"" and ""Argentina under the Proceso de Reorganización Nacional"", as well as other examples . This childish and irrational behaviour has resulted in a blatant misrepresentation of the facts, which is detrimental to Wikipedia's credibility and accuracy. I have tried to reason with this user, but it is unfortunately to no avail.Regretfully , I have no choice but to request that this user be blocked from editing at this time. Sincerely yours,User Winston Smith describes you as “the worst editor I have EVER encountered on wikipedia” while encouraging you to “Please stop this childish behavior.” had his warnings to you about harassment deleted and reported you as a

vandal * has repeatedly reverted to prior revisions of the police state article after being instructed to view the discussion page. I then placed a warning on talk page, which he promptly removed. He continues to remove the warnings. has requested sources for the addition, at least five have been provided, yet refuses to acknowledge their existence and insists on trying to incite an edit war. is continuing to remove edits and warnings of mine from his talk page while falsely accusing me of stalking and sock puppetry. '' It seems that you harass anyone who attempts to edit the Police state article without your viewpoint. This is against WP:NPOV policy. Please stop harassing users otherwise more effective measures will have to be undertaken. As expected, you removed this comment for discussion in violation of wikipedia’s vandalism rules. Please do not remove this again. "

eyesnore fuck me hard eyesnore

" I thought the better of leaving the comment. The delay after the fact was not the issue for me: my off-the-cuff comment didn't make clear the issue and would have required more effort to clarify for no gain for either of us. It's a little hard for me when someone who doesn't know the material makes edits that only confuse the discussion. The source of the word in question was a Hebrew word נזיר, ""dedicated"", which has the third letter, YOD, the source of the Greek iota (in Ναζιραιος) gives the English ""i"". Samson was a נזיר, Nazirite... and so on. Too much effort and its point would have been lost. I couldn't improve on the comment, so I cut it. I couldn't do anything about the history. What should I have done, once the comment was there? I usually do a lot of editing: my first comments often get changed. control "

I think I've made it clear why I've chosen to talk down to you. You actually attempted to hijack a wikipedia page by adding ridiculous and not even all that amusing misinformation simply for your own amusement. You proved this by your original wording of the paragraph and by your countless hypocritical claims of speculation. If this was a serious subject that you were arguing for, I may have respected that. But dude, you're fighting to legitimize misinformation. I have no respect for that. But to cut to the chase (given that this is MY talk page) shut the fuck up you obnoxious little bitch.

" 1)""add it in addition to the definition in words, rather than replace it."" I did not replace the textual defenition, what I did was ""symbolic defenition "" i.e:""the textual one"" 2)I'll take your advice and drop the in stating the defenition. I'had made it a standard for myself to write defenitions in this way, I forgot that this was just me. So check it out,( Uniform convergence ), I hope you like it this way."

ARE YOU DOING THIS CUZ i AM BLAKC??@?@! i AM SOOOOO oFeNNEDED!!

They don't use the hated Ulster Banner or the Butcher's Apron so it is right Belfast doesnt have a flag.

" Arkansas Happy birthday. >_> Call me MoP! "

Hey Fuck you, you Russia-loving cunt.

Removal of three names from roster list I have removed Sean Garrett, Mick Boogie, and Daniel Merriweather as they are not on the Roc Nation website no more and their links to Roc Nation are all broken links.

The reason I mentioned it was that it seems to me that the most important aspect of the history of atheism in the West is that over the course of about three centuries, it developed from being an accusation, to which nobody would admit, to being the belief system of a major part of the world's population. But you cannot mention this without also pointing out that this was in large because Communist parties made it the established view in the states they governed. The association is a historical one, not a logical one, and it is true that there are critics of atheism who try to discredit atheism as a philosophy because of its historical association with Communism (a point mentioned in the article), but the NPOV response to this is NOT just to neglect to mention this important historical association. 12:28, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)

2003 (UTC) done 20:41, 7 Sep

" I removed the singles on the ""AVril Lavigne template"" because there is a new template only for Avril Lavigne songs & single. "

You're very foolish you know that - right if you want confirmation just visit the official FC Internazionale Milano webpage for news of his signing! Are you daft? He has already been issued with a number (77) at Inter.

Bakery In Germany, they now have added threshing, Mixing with water, kneading the dough and leaving it to rise, and baking to harvest breadrolls direct from wheat. I couldn't find any online sources, but have seen this process in operation in Bavaria.

Hey friend, I am glad seeing you here. I do know that my writing can seem bazaar at times and things can be obfuscated. I wanted to be sure that you understood where I was coming from, all the way to Anna? And my wonder if you remember the time we talked before? I actually was worried that I somehow offended you and really wanted to correct any mistake I had made. Cheers

" While ""your"" at it, learn how to spell. Duh. I already did read it, as I bloody well said earlier. Please show me a copy of Balbo's itinerary where he wrote, ""il mio viaggio a Derry"". "

" Well let's do it, cheers. ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section."

There are several definitions of Kinneret - which one?

Rowan Trollope is now a Senior Vice President (as the article has been updated to reflect) so I would say that the move from VP to SVP raises his notability a bit.

Pure nonsense Firstly, it is very impolite to interfere in private communication. Secondly, it was not an edit of an article but my question to an user. 85.202.40.145

" If any1 wishes to discuss the issue in detail, please contact me for an explanation. With regard to ""Shuttegod"" I am in militant disagreement that the previous text he mangled & reduced in his arrogant edit was ""wordy"" or ""awkward"", it was a tight, concise very well written opening to the article explaining in essence what the Anglosphere is. What he reduced it to with his edit - with its bombastic egotistical patronising editing note - was weakly written, mushy, vague & illogical at points. Sorry if that's a bit tuff, but it's the truth. The Anglosphere is an increasingly important concept geo-strategically & it's important to get this source for the term right for those who search via Google for an explanation of it. I am open to edits, but they need to augment & improve the opening text, not reduce & state things that are not true, such as ""Eire being a part of the Anglosphere"" - any1 with the slightest comprehension of the history of Ireland since 1916 can see the fallacy of this view, & whomever holds it does not grasp even the basics of what the Anglosphere actually is! Plantdrew - Yr edit of the arms programme that militarily links the Anglosphere was useful & interesting, & I left it at 1st, even tho it didn't quite belong in the opening preamble of the article as it was a little too micro & not macro enough for an opening principle description, the reason I edited it out in my scrapping of ""Shuttegod's"" massacring of the text is that it seemed to be antagonizing him, & it was out of place a little in the opening. Please place in in the body of the text lower down under a ""military links"" section by all means. Bardrick."

Illicit Use Slang Terms I am thinking this would be a useful subsection and most Wikipedia drug articles appear to include such a section. a very brief example: Slang terms: Powder Cocaine - Coke, C-Jam, Nose Candy, Booger Sugar, Snow, Devil's Dandruff Crack Cocaine -Kibbles & Bits, moonrock (with heroin) Freebase Cocaine - White Tornado, base 12.73.146.46

Article The wording and feel of the article seems to be very academic, as if it was an extract or a modified version of an original university essay, it is not the kind of article you would expect to see in an encyclopedia.

Comments and concerns from Utahredrock

Also, if anyone is able to put together a page comparing the features of the different Yaesu/Vertex Standard/Standard Horizon handheld models, I would certainly appreciate it and find it very useful. Thank you.

Proposal to merge USCGC Jarvis (WHEC-725) with BNS Somudro Joy (F-28) A proposal to merge the articles USCGC Jarvis (WHEC-725) and BNS Somudro Joy (F-28) has been suggested. Discussion can be found on the talk page Talk:USCGC Jarvis (WHEC-725). Interested editors please take note.

Deleting my question, or banning me, doesn't make this go away. All of us old-time Wikipedians know this happened. Why doesn't this article talk about how Jimbo got the Wikimedia credit card taken away cuz he used it to purchase prostitutes in Moscow??? Why should i donate to Wikimedia with this crook in charge?68.185.206.4 (talk)

Renault Alliance Please stop reverting it just because you have your knickers in a bunch over it. It's valid info, and you have not once provided a valid counter-argument. 67.164.224.243

Spelling Isn't the word spelled macuahuitl? Or atleast state the true spelling?

Avro Arrow Hi Mr. Van Houten, I wonder if you could take a look at the Avro CF-105 Arrow discussion page. It seems to have degraded into a discussion over the relative merits of the decision to cancel the Arrow. However, there is an editor that has been compelled to take the discussion into a bizarre turn. He actually backs up his own opinion with comments from an unknown IP address that can be traced back to... him? I don't need anyone to intercede except for maybe an administrator but take a look and give me your opinion. 04:39 4 March 2007 (UTC).

" ""wikipedia isn't perfect, but its model is sound"" FOR JIMMY WALES, CO-FOUNDER Can I suggest that you two guys read Professor John Naughton's excellent article in ""THE OBSERVER"" of 10.08.14? If it helps you understand it, I can get it translated into Belgian (French or Walloon?) and into Dutch? I use both Wikipedia and ODNB and both's editors are equally 'intransigent': ""unwilling or refusing to change one's views or to agree about something.synonyms: uncompromising, inflexible, unbending, unyielding, diehard, unshakable, unwavering, resolute, rigid, unaccommodating, uncooperative, stubborn, obstinate, obdurate, pigheaded, single-minded, iron-willed, stiff-necked""; intransigeant; onverzettelijk: in french/dutch? I CAN DEBATE THE SHORTCOMINGS OF WIKIPEDIA UNTIL (AS WE SAY IN COLLOQUIAL ENGLISH) ""THE COWS COME HOME"", BUT THERE IS NO COMPLETE AGREEMENT ANYWHERE IN THE ACADEMIC WORLD AS TO WHO EXACTLY CONSTITUTED THE BLOOMSBURY GROUP, SO ALL THE MEMBERS ARE A MATTER OF OPINION AND NOT FACT GUYS. WHAT IS CERTAIN IS THAT A SIGNIFICANT PROPORTION OF MALE MEMBERS WERE CAMBRIDGE APOSTLES. Understand the above points and we may have the basis for further discussion? Otherwise....2.27.131.74 2.27.131.74 "

Disbarment complaint Can this article please reflect news that there is an attempt to have him disbarred? These news articles talk about it. 140.247.141.165

Was it simply my username? Any guidance is appreciated!

", 22 January 2008 (UTC) Don't feel dumb, easy mistake. I'll look over it. ''''''Love 20:34"

I'm Portuguese. I Speak Portuguese. I Speak Galician. And it is in fact the same language. Altought numorous castilian words and castilian influence is present in galician. Another error: Portugal declared independence from Kingdom of Leon in 23 of June 1128. Portugal was independent when the Count of Portugal turned to be the king of Portugal - the year was 1139 (Till today there are many countries that are independent and have a prince, for example, as the head of State.) The king of Leon and Castille recognized Portugal as an independent country in 1143. The pope recognized Portugal as a full independent and cristian nation in 1179. So, declaration of Independence: 1128 Recognition: 1143 1139 and 1179 ?!?!?!?!?!?! What?????????????? Never even eard of that dates, not even at history classes! Only when reading some history books.

" One more thing which I forgot to mention. If yo find that other editors disagree with your edits and revert them (i.e. undo them) don't just keep on repeating your edits, in the hope that others will give up and let you get your way. Repeatedly reverting to your preferred version, known as edit warring, is regarded as unhelpful, and editors who keep on doing it may be blocked from editing, to prevent disruption of the project. If you are convinced that your edits are best, then explain why on the article's talk page (such as Talk:Heineken), and be prepared to discuss the issues, and try to reach agreement. The editor who uses the pseudonym """" "

Any socking on your part, either by named accounts or IPs will be reverted, and the account will be blocked. I am revoking access to your talk page.