Datasets:

Intuit-GenSRF

/

combined_toxicity_profanity_v2_eval_only

like 0

" Have a look at the bit that goes ""In the 1990s, Bodiam Castle was at the centre of a debate in castle studies over the balance between militaristic and social interpretations of such sites..."" - it's in the ""Picturesque ruin"" section. "

which coincides with your history of showing bias against any non-INC religion

I don't understand the point of this article This seems like a waste of space on the internet. I don't get it?

" == I wasnt really attacking him/her regarding the Lisa Williams article (Hmpzzz!) Do you know if Lisa can see dead people too? I have psychic powers too you know, i can see the future! Send all these ""Lisa Williams"" to Finland and they will all be locked in jails for being scam artists!"

Time for another blocked IP address. Lets see how many I can do tonight.

Sources explicitly criticized brief mention brief mention and dismissal From John D. Hawks

Net does not deserve a section on this page. They are a group of four bloggers.( )

You keep winning these edit conflicts with me, but then you end up saying exactly what I wanted to say but more eloquently. =D!

'' region, it looks as if it were an administrative

boy! no more wink-wank from the stink-stank! 77.184.28.171

Because Propol, your a little fuck

Making some small changes because your locations are completely reversed. You listed north as south and west as east in relation to where Hilakku was actually situated. I'm assuming it was merely an accident.

Requesting an Edit Unblock My current ISP is a cable company that uses dynamic IP addresses. Please consider removing the current ban on this IP. 64.138.215.134 Mason Collins Note: Secondary e-mail address, checked less often.

I added more references, softened the tone to allegations rather than facts, and added that Shyamalan's company and Disney issued statements calling the accusations meritless. 76.20.213.207

Hi , I'm back from my sister's wedding! I'll be happy to help you with all that, although I need to warn you that I have very limited access to library materials, and I've never scanned or OCR'd anything in my whole life. Where does one go to find a scanner? Maybe we should also take care of the concerns on the peer review as well? Forgive me, but I'll be on Wikipedia only spottily as I dive back into the real world; I was away for a long time!

" Question Umm, how can translating parts of the text in EPSXe to German be considered ""vandalising""?"

Artwork controversy Shouldn't there be mention of the controversy of one of the photos included with the CD - Tori Amos nursing a piglet?

"....would you prefer expressing my frustration in what i don't agree with and try to say it as direct and respectful as possible or would you prefer for me to not say much and be harsh to you and not give care to what you sat? would that be suit you better?i could..but i don't think that's what you want...ramblings you said just because you don't like to be told off doesn't mean its rambling, deal with it like a MAN and take criticism because not everyone does things the same way...so for you or anyone complaining about speaking one's mind i could care less tbh but you're abusing your power and you are the reason or one of the reasons you make it unpleasant for some to edit in wikipedia...even when i try to to make good edits and a lot more thorough and informative you have a complaint about it.. i'm doing exactly the same thing you are doing pal, are not any more or lesser than me....don't talk the talk if you can't take it when people speak their mind about things you don't want to hear cause that right there is childish, you expect people to bow to you and not respond? lol good luck with that you're not getting that out of me...i mean i'm willing to compromise and discuss things but you are putting half-assed edits..i'm filling them out an expanding and putting sources on them i might add and you or others with your limited mentality revert an article to 1 with very little information ..how are empty spaces better than filled ones? that makes absolutely no sense...i even provide some sources from where i get my stuff from and still complain n harass?...you prob didn't even notice some of the edits there you see in even your edits and others were done by ME lol, you just built upon it and added your own, i'm not saying you nor others taking credit for others work and research (i hope not that's just unprofessional and messed up) but you got something of a personal motive that you're not admitting to, if i'm doing the edits as best as i can and doing it the same way as you are and tryign to provide sources...what s the problem then? the stuff i get my

info from are from credited 1st or 3rd party websites lol..what more do you need? the signatures of the editors of the other websites where i get my info from? come on now haha..why don't you be a little more honest and say what really is your problem with me instead of making escuses for it and when people confront you about it or want to speak their mind you back out...oh yeah that's very mature pal just because i don't believe in the same ideals as you ...i mean how can an admin of such ""REPUTATION"" be so naive..i don't get it..you don't like others to express their disapproval or speak their mind about how to improve an article i mean this is what U r doing ""4 + X = 5""..that's ok to you right ..missing information that you won't even bother to look up fully and this isn't a grammar class people make typos all the time big deal deal with it..this isn't a regular article its a talk page. i got my say as much as you do regardless of how long you have being editing here or your position here etc, i have a say as much as you do...if you can't take criticism of your poorly edited works than maybe you shouldn't be editing here in the first place..you have no seniority or control over me whatsoever..no one does as i don't have over you ...all i'm asking is for me do do things right and i'am i give u sources , i flesh out the articles n fill in the blanks ..what more do you want guy?...don't make arrogant excuses about my typos or so called ramblings just because you can't take being told in your face criticism in your work...the point is i COMPLETE the articles..you and others with your mentality don't finish it or bother to do a more thorough look..so don't make excuses for your wrong doings ..so you can't take criticism, you don't like other people's edits that re more complete and informative than yours unless you are the 1 editing them, you make excuses for people speaking their mind when they tell you things

in your face that are mostly true but you aren't mature enough to own up to it, you make it personal...so if you or anyone who thinks like you don't think about it or made the effort than its BAD right? lol...who you think you are? god ? lol ....i try to be respectful and i want to be able to edit freely in my own way even though my versions are usually more complete , informative and thorough, i don't make up facts i don't troll or do things with bad intentions here..especially here because i rely in wikipedia myself when i want to look up something just because you haven't thought it up or made the effort to be more thorough doesn't mean you or your kind with your mindset have to abuse their authority here because they weren't creative enough to come up wit h it themselves..like i said go ahead and make excuses about misspellings and ramblings because you hide under that to mask your own faults wish it was you who done it and thought it up

' that are not either self promotion or personal attacks, despite several warnings, I've blocked him indefinitely. If he is able to demonstrate to me or any other admin that he will not engage in this behaviour further, he may be unblocked, but if the behaviour does continue after being unblocked, then I expect that he will be blocked again.Sean Black (talk) Final letter to MIT and SIMS

Comment Not vandalizing I was not vandalizing, I was removing a repeated paragraph.

User:Rayrayzone - Quit talkin shit about my brother, my label & my crew you PUNK ASS MUTHFUCKER EAT A DICK

Hello, and thanks for the message. As per WP:NONENG, sources in languages other than English can also be used. Let me check the last source you mention, and if it supports the state ownership claim, I'll add it for yourself into the article. Regards.'''' ''

" As Diemietrie suggests, always a fixed order which may well be French-name/Dutch-name. (I'm Dutch-speaking, the order is not nearly as important as omitting one in the titles: it is first the majority language of the present locals of most of these municipalities and then the majority language of the visiting or there working countrymen/women.) Thus as I explained in the relevant discussion on 21 Dec2006 23:42, 22 Dec2006 04:48 and 23 Dec2006 00:59. — 24 Dec2006 03:13 (UTC)"

If you're allowed to remove prods... ...why is there a warning template for doing it:({{subst:uw-afd1-4}})?

picking on a 10 year old!!! soooo sad Just shut up okay?Im only 10 years old. I just wanted to have a little fun, captain buzz kill. I guess you never had a life when you were young. that was probably like, 100000000000000000 years old. LOL!!!! 75.27.114.194 None yo beez nas

Hey, Crimsone. In the future, if you don't want to suffer personal attacks - it's best if you don't attacks others by calling their attacks vandalism. You're pretty much just asking for it at that point.

" Hey there, I seen that you are a native German speaker and I wonder whether you can please help me and translate the following sentence to English, objectively as possible: ""Mögen wir zehnmal von Juden abstammen und ich im Princip noch so sehr für Gleichberechtigung der Hebräer sein, im socialen Leben sind mir Christen lieber ..."" Best217.132.230.146 "

"What do you mean? There were plenty of cases of rape. Just because BBC didn't mention rape does not mean it did not happen. It not like the BBC are on the ground 24/7. Even if they are a respected news source, what counts is people who were actually there and I know people who had relatives killed and raped. The only thing that needs to be changed is that the numbers of those killed needs to increase significantly. I know there was a lot more than 3,000 people killed. The Government furthermore did indeed organize the massacres. Not to mention the government soldiers were committing massacres against Tamils in Northern Sri Lanka, the same time Tamils were massacred in Southern Sri Lanka around Colombo in 1983, which apparently is the ""capital"" of the ""entire"" Sri Lankan Country!? Plus what makes this all nonsense is that there are massacres against Tamils continuing today. The Sri Lankan military (armed by: India, Pakistan, Israel, USA, Great Britain, China, Australia, Russia) has already killed 100s of Tamils in Sambur in a Northern Town of Sri Lanka. I think that its time to admit all truths, because lying and denying won't get us anywhere. This is becoming a cat and mouse game. While you keep denying rape happened in 1983, tamils are being bombed by the Sri Lankan Military in Sambur right now! Come on! "

" Battle of Britain Aircrew Thanks for helping me with the BoB aircrew list... I'm now in Canada, so probably working on it through your night! Do you have access to Kenneth Wynne's book ""Men of the Battle""? I can't get hold of a copy out here, so if you can get one from a library it would be fantastic! There's loads of events going on to celebrate the 70th Anniversary - check them out at http://battleofbritain1940.net/bobhsoc/index.html - I just wish I were in the UK. I doesn't seem like five years since I was saluting Prince Charles and the Duchess of Cornwall as they unveiled the Battle of Britain Monument in London! Best wishes and thanks again "

I endorse Elaqueate's comments (here and above). There are two factors which must be followed when adding content. First, what is the consensus amongst editors. (At present there is no consensus to add the items which IP is seeking.) Next, what do WP policies say? (The policy about consensus says WP policy itself will be respected. In this case the main policy is restrictions on BLP content.) –

Simpsons cast members Please stop removing my edits (Cloris Leachman, Larry King, etc regarding Simpsons cast members. Look at the history page for C. Leachman and the CfD . Note that all other TV shows/film categories have been renamed to cast members to include all guest/one-off actors.

. Just my two cents though

Messages on talk pages during an AfD Placing messages on Users talk pages such as and in the hope of gaining support is an unacceptable practice which, agin, hinders the AfD process.

nasals have a tendency to cause raising in the vowel preceding them for some reason

" Invitation to take part in a study I am a Wikipedian, who is studying the phenomenon on Wikipedia. I need your help to conduct my research on about understanding ""Motivation of Wikipedia contributors."" I would like to invite you to . Please give me your valuable time, which estimates about 20 minutes. I chose you as a English Wikipedia user who made edits recently through the RecentChange page. Refer to the first page in the online survey form for more information on the study and me. "

You mean you fufilled your obligation by making the block last only 24 hours? Wow, what a great admin you are by partially following the rules! For the record, MediaWiki 1.5 has a bug in it that automatically renews your block if you hit edit even under your regular account. That means that if someone doesn't know they've been blocked yet and they hit 'edit', it's renwed. If they want to check the block page page again or want to see if it's expired yet, it's also renewed. The feature is supposed to only renew if you try editing under a different account than the one you were blocked under, but the bug is extending beyond that. 1 July 2005 11:40 (UTC)

Bureaucrat chat (Referenced section on the Bureaucrats' noticeboard) I'm afraid I don't see why you should take offense at the comment I left, as I was only trying to explain that I perform the same function for various other users. If you, for instance, wanted a rename performed on a project where you weren't familiar with the language, I would be willing to assist you in the request, whether it required me to simply file the rename in English or in the local language (assuming I can either find a translator or do it myself.) Having dealt with rename requests given to me by bureaucrats of other projects myself, I tend to feel such assistance is welcome. Granted, in this case, the metaphor breaks down somewhat. I think that it's reasonable for a user unfamiliar with protocol to assume that you would request flags restored in the same location you asked them temporarily removed. If you took the comment in offense, I certainly apologize, though I'm puzzled how it might be taken as an offensive statement.

" Haley Industries Please stop vandalizing my work on Haley Industries. It's more than a little bit annoying! I have already explained why Haley Industries is ""notable"", and yet you continue to claim that it's ""not important""? Do you have any reasonable explanation for your behaviour? I would like to move this up to admin arbitration if you are determined to shut down my article for no valid reason."

This edit This was reverted. When u use web news sites such as Tamilnet to esatblish facts outside of WP:SLR articles u will run into it. That's why I stay away from it as much as possible. You really do have to read WP rules very carefully such as WP:RS & WP:Verifiability. It says {[Quote|Articles should rely on reliable, third-party published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy.[4] Reliable sources are necessary both to substantiate material within articles and to give credit to authors and publishers in order to avoid plagiarism and copyright violations. Sources should directly support the information as it is presented in an article and should be appropriate to the claims made: exceptional claims require high-quality sources. In general, the most reliable sources are peer-reviewed journals and books published in university presses; university-level textbooks; magazines, journals, and books published by respected publishing houses; and mainstream newspapers. As a rule of thumb, the greater the degree of scrutiny involved in checking facts, analyzing legal issues, and scrutinizing the evidence and arguments of a particular work, the more reliable it is. Academic and peer-reviewed publications are highly valued and usually the most reliable sources in areas where they are available, such as history, medicine and science. Material from reliable non-academic sources may also be used in these areas, particularly if they are respected mainstream publications. The appropriateness of any source always depends on the context. Where there is disagreement between sources, their views should be clearly attributed in the text.}} That's why we use Tamilnet as a QS not RS. You have thousands of peer reviewed academic books to establish the same facts using google books. No one will fight you then.

what exactly is your problem? why are you vandalising articles i edit? is this going to be a personal crusader? is it fun? are you bored? whya not write some articles on your own instead of ruining other ones?

I was blocked for reporting their harassment then. Same thing you liar.

You can block and block and suck my cock but nothing can stop freedom of speech. In the end, America wins. We always do. Ask Saddam. My sockpuppet army is on the march. 02:13, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed This article was based on Powell A. W. B., New Zealand Mollusca, William Collins Publishers Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand 1979 ISBN 0-00-216906-1. It has been revised on this date to eliminate a probable copyright violation of that book. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion.) Thank you. (talk)

" Blocked Your repeated warnings and continued findings of copyright violations tell me you have no desire to either fix your errors or edit constructively. As a result you are blocked. "

Disappointing. ...in regards to the level of opposition at ITN/C over a monumental handshake/meeting being put up on the front page. But thank you for your support! I was really hoping to see more people involved in Ireland-related articles putting their view across on this.

" I used WP:TWINKLE to place the proposed deletion notice, and it automatically adds a note to your talk page. Sorry about that. ... talk "

This is going too far with Glenn and Emico tagteaming to defend each other's bias and supporting each other's fabrications to make me look bad. I'm beginning not to care anymore myself, I'm trying to improve this article and these two constant complainers, who haven't done anything except revert and whine act like they own the Wikipedia. I hope everyone can see their conduct and draw their own opinions about the Iglesia ni Cristo. 22:48, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Johnpedia That was so long ago, how did you even know? do you stalk my page? I changed ONE word, it was harmless, and the person changed it right back. It was a while ago, you missed the bus. I don't understand why you bothered.

Hi Canoe, simple copyediting doesn't require going to the sources at hand for something high level like this, and I am already familiar with the incident. Best regards.

Reasons to inserting neutrality tags is very much funny Requesting facts from Obi2canibe SLT resorting to militancy due to their sympathy on Indian Tamils and Sinhalese by some government cruel actions against Indian Tamils and Sinhalese ( Indian Tamils - CC Act, Sinhalese - standardization). Better you can say You were hurt by Aryan Barbarian discrimination in India and since SLT unable to reach Aryan in India, SLT raised arms against Sinhalese who are also Aryan section. But give me references how Tamils get hurt from this and I will include them. Please give references to Tamil heritage out side of Sinhalese kingdom(With SLT). I will insert them to the article. Let me know when Tamils drops the colonization (Land) is a major issue since this has clear relationship to Sinhalese expel in 1215. I will drop claim the conflict started to appear since 1215. Let me know you needs to start a section war crimes by both parties. Let me know you needs to include genocides by both parties. I only know genocides by LTTE (Temple tooth,muslim church, secreat tree, kent dollar farms,... ). I will merge it with your list

" I am not afraid of your threats (it's not an insult I talked nice to you). If you don't know about 94% of Albanians (who were in a poll) support terrorist so called ""KLA"". 6% of the rest were killed by KLA because they cooperated with Serbs. And albanians can't be ""normal people"" since they are not humans at all and absolutely not normal (what kind of human being could kill a innocent baby and burn it allive, or burn 300 churches for nothing)? Ok I understand that but why do you protect them? Anyway why don't we speak Serbian? In my life I never met an albanian (animal names are written with first letter little ) ) that didn't say I hope you 'll die at least 7 times when we met (I was talking nice to them untill they didn't insult without reason). I am very angry because of this and it's one more reason why I hate them. To me I don't consider a human anyone who supports Serbian Kosovo independence (it's like someone supports slaughtering milion of innocent children). Thank you very much for your support and if you were little more on the side of the truth I would award you, but sorry I can't do it right now. Good luck! Све најбоље! "

I agree with you about GraemeL's intentions. He is a revert nazi and wikipedia has a way of protecting against this. Report him to the WP:3RR Three-revert-rule notice board. -Posted by: Report The Revert Nazi GraemeL has shown himself/herself to be a revert nazi. This is unacceptable on a site that is made by it's users and not it's admins. If you feel you have been unjustly reverted more than 3 times over a 24 hour period please report him/her to the three-revert-noticeboard, WP:3RR. It is time to take back what is ours!

there are a couple problems with your suggestion to follow this guideline 1. this list is incomplete and it's going to be added onto in the near future. 2. the sentences are redundant and will become more redundant as the list gets bigger. 3. it's going to end up being a list anyway once more information is added.

Indefinite block of user Pdfpdf As a long term Wikipedia acquaintance of

Although the older Nickel Coin (Canada 1958) IS magnetic.

im a vomit lover yourname i love it when girls vomit on me

. and how come my comment doesn't have its own edit link huh? Like Reg Rarnell. It's like I'm geting kicked in the face by use guys and I don't even get my own edit? And how come I can't have a wiki article about me? Huh, I mean come on Hitler has a wiki page but I don't? Sure doesn't sound right to me

with this new event that occurred i am outraged that u have placed a tag on me for speedy deletion i am sorry but wikipedia is for people who actually have the ability to determine what is important and what is not. You as a editor should have mastered that ability yet you have deleted my article and whatever else i have said. The information i have graciously added to the wikipedia foundation is valuable and can benefit more people then u can ever imagine so please next time you do something similar to this to other people have the common sense to stop because i seriously recommend for you to see a neurologist, you have a serious problem. I suggest for you to stop and delete your account on wikipedia because you are just hurting the foundation as an editor instead of benefiting it with contributions because you delete everything you see for entertainment when you really should be seriously reading and analyzing the information you see.

" I gave the quickest examples I could find. I can find numerous other references to the poppier nature of Van Halen on all three sources. And while I agree a source is not often 100% reliable, especially one relying on opinion...3 major sources IS. Especially given they're frequently used accross Wikipedia. Van Halen began as a hard rock band with a heavy metal edge at times...but ""Dreams"" is definitely a pop rock song. Generally the 1984 album is considered the one where the band became poppier, and in the Sammy Hagar era that really took root. Power ballads are the most common pop rock crossover out there. Oh, and a lot of their covers were poppy songs anyway, like You Really Got Me. I have some more stuff below, but first, look at this. I doubt you can be bothered to listen to them all, but listen to the first 30 seconds of each: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=83eMZZ518xE http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5wAlbH5v7OA http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YfTwMgGBARM http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mBDC2m7Qxxk http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4oZhSWhJ7lM http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lit8LbTQQZo http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2zwoIW9bEa4 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X1w5IvHSPec http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pQ-5nwt-j9E As a side note, Bon Jovi's first two albums are definitely glam metal - they made their name as part of the glam metal scene. Which is pop metal by the way, making it hard to classify. They went the commercial side of things and moved away from metal. Guns N' Roses, again, sleaze rock. Something that formed from the ashes of glam metal - but Guns N' Roses were among the first. So the line between sleaze and metal blurs with them. They ARE the crossover point. AC/DC

I'd not call metal, and I think KISS had a few metal songs but don't really count...but they are heavily disputed the two of them. Opinions on either carry little weight. Wikipedia has several definitions for pop rock: ""Pop rock is a subgenre of rock music that uses ""catchy"" pop style, with light lyrics over top of ""guitar-based"" songs"". I would say that sums up some of Van Halen's stuff to a t. ""they only use pop hooks or synths to appeal to both a hard rock and pop audience from time to time""? Have you heard their latter-day singles? ""Sure they used synth, and sure they've used pop hooks, but haven't countless other hard rock and heavy metal bands done so?"" It most frequently happened in glam metal. Which is aka pop metal. Glam metal is a genre a lot of people wanted to attach to Van Halen, personally I think just because something's pop rock and heavy metal at different times does not make it pop metal. Hence my desire to keep pop rock - the comparisons to glam metal are made obvious that way. It's hard to ignore them, but also impossible to just call it glam metal."

The image for the Anal-oral sex article is complete: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Wiki-analoral.png . Again, if it's what you had in mind, add it to the article. I am working on an alternate image, that more accurately depicts the act itself, but this will have to do for now.

Jizz page needs cleanup but not Semen I would hold anything against a sockpuppet master such as myself. You are a hypocrite, a fucking goof, like the boy who ejaculates for the first time. ~So it goes

I will do Whatever i want and it is my right, what is both of yous Problem Asshole.

Hello!! It's Lazar again. I just listened to the same bible passage in Macedonian (standard) and in Bulgarian (standard). I am a serb and have concluded yes, macedonian is bulgarian. However it is heavily serbinized. -Lazar

Comment If its not too churlish, I think there should be a few lines in about the only meaningful attacks made in daylight against the landings by the Luftwaffe. No substantial by any means, but it keeps the myth that the only German aircraft to appear over the beaches were the Fw 190s of Priller and his wingman.

U FUCK U MAN U R A ASSHOLE BLOCK ME I HATE WIKIPEDIA

Destinations no longer encyclopaedic? The list of destinations is no longer encyclopaedic as no reliable reference can be provided. Given that the airline has ceased operation I would like to suggest that the list is reduced to a paragraph or two describing the major bases of operations and countries served. Comments?

) Editing I am seeking someone who would be willing to do an editing job on my weekly play by plays as well as this one. I'm afraid I am not the best at editing and think teaming up with someone might make these a lot better. Would anyone be willing to help out? (Eternally addicted to this show

" Okay. No problem then. Sing your songThe bird's seeds "

Also I'll like to apologize to Gandydancer since I misread one of his comments. He was actually saying that the victim's name should be included. Humbly sorry my friend. Also I'll like to say that I respect everyone's views but I respect Wikipedia policies too. And as of current mentioning the victim's name with a reliable source is completely justified according to Wikipedia policies.

" Thanks! I just saw your latest efforts at Leon Jordan and went to email you, but see I needn't. My responses three nights ago represented impaired judgment, I accept your explanation that an attempt to delete an article on a noteworthy subject is not necessarily bad faith at all, but a good faith effort to keep Wikipedia professional-istic. I greatly approve of your work on the Leon M. Jordan article (possibly, the name of it should be changed to Leon M. Jordan btw), and plan to reintroduce Freedom Inc. only when there is significantly more information than when ""Riderz Tide"" or whomever created it on the fly. Apparently. "

" Silence is Defeat You deleted this page with the comment ""crook scheme""; could you explain, please? If it's a fraud then it might be worthwhile to explain that in the article.  Jones m 00:26, 11 Sep 2004 (UTC)"

The number of articles waiting for review is the total number, not the number ahead of you. To see the list, in order, look at Category:Pending AfC submissions, and if you don't see your draft, select (next 200) to see more. You can also see what's happening on this page: Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Submissions/List, which cana be sorted by date.

why? why did you delete my tdi couples section? huh you big, fat ugly, mother fucker that's full of bullshit?

File:GIjoeCClogo.jpg I have tagged File:GIjoeCClogo.jpg as . In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. Otherwise, it will be deleted in seven days.

Cats in zero gravity Skip to the 3 minute mark. No need to thank me, everyone.

thank you! ) I will make an account if you unblock me so this no longer happens! }}.

" Talkback Blessed be!! Talk "

..oh im sorry, you like him.

Oh Fuck you, nigger.

File:EsmeBianco.jpg listed for deletion A file that you uploaded or altered, File:EsmeBianco.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

" Lack of Follow-Up by User:Ktr101|Kevin Rutherford on deletion made 26 November 2011 - is confirmed VANDALISM by lack of response after 97 days. Mr. Rutherford has made no attempt to answer here about his deletion of sourced content whose veracity is as strong or stronger than what User:Mikenorton (above) assesses as 'reliable sources' (i.e. Orey, Cal (2006) book as source material.) [gleefully he wrote above: ""That's much better - I can actually see the wood for the trees now.""] In addition, by implication User:Mikenorton is implying that wikipedia articles themselves are unreliable (as sources). This is evidence for censorship by User:Mikenorton as well. If you want to be taken seriously User:Mikenorton I suggest you read and comprehend the deleted material before spouting ""misrepresenatations of fact"" about the deleted material."

The section should be readable and representative of the unique points made about this album, not comprehensive and bludgeoning readers with the same thing being said in a different way.

If there is going to be one age, someone will have to spend time deleting the old one, and creating the new tables to match what is already on the page. I think the Best Actor page looks very messy having the two different categories there one on top of the other. I mean in one year alone for Best Lead Actress there was 10 foreign nominees, and then adding the British nominees on top of that would be overwhelming and keeping them separate makes it more simple. It is encyclopedic and not factually incorrect if it states at the top of the page the the winners from 1952-1967 are the winners of the Best Foreign Award. The Best Foreign winners are winners from many different countries and the Best British winners are obviously all British and most from British films, so I feel they are very different and should be on separate pages. Creating 3 would be making it hard for potential readers to figure out where to go look for the listings. I think the way it is now is fine.

Sadly, there are far, far too many people like that.

Correct - 'resentment rides high' - I hate wp and I hate you dumbass fucking admins who don't even edit articles and are clueless to the political chicanery they connive with, most of all.

Transtheism I think your reversion was correct. My mistake.

, 22 October 2009 (UTC) Ok 21:39

IT'S MINE, NOT YOURS FOR THE LAST TIME! 99.38.126.156

" {| style=""background-color:#F5FFFA; padding:0;"" cellpadding=""0"" |style=""border:1px solid #084080; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top; color:#000000;""| Hello, 12.179.221.130! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! (call me Russ) {| width=""100%"" style=""background-color:#F5FFFA;"" |style=""width: 55%; border:1px solid #FFFFFF; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top""| Getting started A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images Intuitive guide to Wikipedia Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability |class=""MainPageBG"" style=""width: 55%; border:1px solid #FFFFFF; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top""| {| width=""100%"" cellpadding=""0"" cellspacing=""5"" style=""vertical-align:top; background-color:#F5FFFA"" ! The community |- |style=""color:#000""| Build consensus • Resolve dispute

s Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats NEW

"Since we have no idea who Henry is, why do we qualify Arturo with ""Henry's brother""? I'm guessing that the paragraph originally said that Henry Somethingorother originated the style at a place called Henry's Puffy Taco in San Antonio. In that case, it would be relevant and interesting that Arturo of Arturo's Puffy Taco in Whittier was Henry's brother. But without that information, it's like characterizing the 1980 presidential elections as ""a contest between Billy's brother Jimmy and Neil's brother Ronald"". 70.36.140.136 Thanks to you and for pointing this out! The taco article is subject to constant revision (if not vandalism) and it's often impossible to keep track of the changes within changes. It looks like a reference was deleted at some point and changes in the text led to the difficulties you mentioned. I took a stab at copyediting the paragraph so that the references to Henry & Arturo Lopez make sense. I've also added a citation for the Lopez family history. By all means have a go at making it better! Who, me? I'm a little doubtful that this level of detail is desirable—perhaps if puffy tacos got their own article—but the text does make sense now. Thanks. I'm not sure if an article focused solely on puffy tacos would fly. Puffy tacos seem to be a variation on the basic theme which, while notable, isn't really distinctive enough to warrant an article. I could be wrong—it has happened! o) Perhaps trimming down the mention here is a better way to go. Please take a stab at doing either! Who, me? Hard-shell tacos I have two issues with this section: 1. The first image you show is of an extruded cornmeal product, or "" taco shell,"" which is baked at the factory and doesn't fit with the rest of the info. For example, the patented fryer you describe is not for these extruded shells if they're fried, they're tortillas, if they're these shells, they are not fried. So, that image doesn't work here. 2. The term, ""hard-shell taco"

" I was born and raised in California and have lived in Arizona and on the East Coast, and I can't say I've ever seen anything called a ""hard-shell taco"" on a menu. Is this a regional designation, possibly in the Northeast where the fryer was patented? If so, you need to state that and cite a source. Many small, non-ethnic restaurants serve these extruded products just because they are labor free and can be stored almost indefinitely. but they just call them tacos. To order a soft taco in such a restaurant (assuming it's an option) means only that you want an actual tortilla to be used for your taco. On the term ""hard-shell taco"", see for example, this post about a Los Angeles, California eatery called Tito's Tacos. Who, me? "

, or when you cry that you got castrated

" Possibly unfree File:Ajvdelft.jpg An image that you uploaded or altered, File:Ajvdelft.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. ~ ' ~ ' "

Thank you;). I hope now it is okay for everyone.

User:Dominick I see you have experience with editor Dominick. If you have anything relevant to add to this complaint about his tactics, please do so: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Dominick#Evidence_of_disputed_behavior Thank you.

Title section revert Hi, I was at the office earlier and I hadn't noticed your warning before restoring the title of the section. I'm sorry for that. Of course I won't do such a revert again. Just to clarify, I've opened a new section to indeed alert some contributors that they were behaving in a way in line with the examples of ownership behaviour as described here. In return the title of the section has been twisted to something unrelated and one of my message has been erased. It is the first time I see people editing other's signed contributions in a talk page. This just looks crazy to me.