Datasets:

seba3y
/

speechocean762

	---
	language:
	- en
	size_categories:
	- 1K<n<10K
	task_categories:
	- audio-classification
	dataset_info:
	features:
	- name: spk
	dtype: int64
	- name: age
	dtype: int64
	- name: gender
	dtype: string
	- name: utt_name
	dtype: int64
	- name: audio
	dtype:
	audio:
	sampling_rate: 16000
	- name: utt_text
	dtype: string
	- name: utt_accuracy
	dtype: int64
	- name: utt_completeness
	dtype: float64
	- name: utt_fluency
	dtype: int64
	- name: utt_prosodic
	dtype: int64
	- name: utt_total
	dtype: int64
	- name: words
	dtype: string
	- name: words_accuracy
	dtype: string
	- name: words_stress
	dtype: string
	- name: words_total
	dtype: string
	- name: phones
	dtype: string
	- name: phones_godness
	dtype: string
	splits:
	- name: train
	num_bytes: 291183074.0
	num_examples: 2500
	- name: test
	num_bytes: 289185618.0
	num_examples: 2500
	download_size: 612060621
	dataset_size: 580368692.0
	configs:
	- config_name: default
	data_files:
	- split: train
	path: data/train-*
	- split: test
	path: data/test-*
	---
	# speechocean762: A non-native English corpus for pronunciation scoring task

	## Introduction
	Pronunciation scoring is a crucial technology in computer-assisted language learning (CALL) systems. The pronunciation quality scores might be given at phoneme-level, word-level, and sentence-level for a typical pronunciation scoring task.

	This corpus aims to provide a free public dataset for the pronunciation scoring task.
	Key features:
	* It is available for free download for both commercial and non-commercial purposes.
	* The speaker variety encompasses young children and adults.
	* The manual annotations are in multiple aspects at sentence-level, word-level and phoneme-level.

	This corpus consists of 5000 English sentences. All the speakers are non-native, and their mother tongue is Mandarin. Half of the speakers are Children, and the others are adults. The information of age and gender are provided.

	Five experts made the scores. To avoid subjective bias, each expert scores independently under the same metric.


	## The scoring metric
	The experts score at three levels: phoneme-level, word-level, and sentence-level.

	### Phoneme level
	Score the pronunciation goodness of each phoneme within the words.

	Score range: 0-2
	* 2: pronunciation is correct
	* 1: pronunciation is right but has a heavy accent
	* 0: pronunciation is incorrect or missed

	### Word level
	Score the accuracy and stress of each word's pronunciation.

	#### Accuracy
	Score range: 0 - 10
	* 10: The pronunciation of the word is perfect
	* 7-9: Most phones in this word are pronounced correctly but have accents
	* 4-6: Less than 30% of phones in this word are wrongly pronounced
	* 2-3: More than 30% of phones in this word are wrongly pronounced. In another case, the word is mispronounced as some other word. For example, the student mispronounced the word "bag" as "bike"
	* 1: The pronunciation is hard to distinguish
	* 0: no voice

	#### Stress
	Score range: {5, 10}
	* 10: The stress is correct, or this is a mono-syllable word
	* 5: The stress is wrong

	### Sentence level
	Score the accuracy, fluency, completeness and prosodic at the sentence level.

	#### Accuracy
	Score range: 0 - 10
	* 9-10: The overall pronunciation of the sentence is excellent, with accurate phonology and no obvious pronunciation mistakes
	* 7-8: The overall pronunciation of the sentence is good, with a few pronunciation mistakes
	* 5-6: The overall pronunciation of the sentence is understandable, with many pronunciation mistakes and accent, but it does not affect the understanding of basic meanings
	* 3-4: Poor, clumsy and rigid pronunciation of the sentence as a whole, with serious pronunciation mistakes
	* 0-2: Extremely poor pronunciation and only one or two words are recognizable

	#### Completeness
	Score range: 0.0 - 1.0
	The percentage of the words with good pronunciation.

	#### Fluency
	Score range: 0 - 10
	* 8-10: Fluent without noticeable pauses or stammering
	* 6-7: Fluent in general, with a few pauses, repetition, and stammering
	* 4-5: the speech is a little influent, with many pauses, repetition, and stammering
	* 0-3: intermittent, very influent speech, with lots of pauses, repetition, and stammering

	#### Prosodic
	Score range: 0 - 10
	* 9-10: Correct intonation at a stable speaking speed, speak with cadence, and can speak like a native
	* 7-8: Nearly correct intonation at a stable speaking speed, nearly smooth and coherent, but with little stammering and few pauses
	* 5-6: Unstable speech speed, many stammering and pauses with a poor sense of rhythm
	* 3-4: Unstable speech speed, speak too fast or too slow, without the sense of rhythm
	* 0-2: Poor intonation and lots of stammering and pauses, unable to read a complete sentence

	## Data structure
	The following tree shows the file structure of this corpus on [github](https://github.com/jimbozhang/speechocean762):
	```
	├── scores.json
	├── scores-detail.json
	├── train
	│ ├── spk2age
	│ ├── spk2gender
	│ ├── spk2utt
	│ ├── text
	│ ├── utt2spk
	│ └── wav.scp
	├── test
	│ ├── spk2age
	│ ├── spk2gender
	│ ├── spk2utt
	│ ├── text
	│ ├── utt2spk
	│ └── wav.scp
	└── WAVE
	├── SPEAKER0001
	│ ├── 000010011.WAV
	│ ├── 000010035.WAV
	│ ├── ...
	│ └── 000010173.WAV
	├── SPEAKER0003
	│ ├── 000030012.WAV
	│ ├── 000030024.WAV
	│ ├── ...
	│ └── 000030175.WAV
	└── SPEAKER0005
	├── 000050003.WAV
	├── 000050010.WAV
	├── ...
	└── 000050175.WAV
	```

	There are two datasets: `train` and `test`, and both are in Kaldi's data directory style.


	The scores are stored in `scores.json`. Here is an example:

	```
	{
	"000010011": { # utt-id
	"text": "WE CALL IT BEAR", # transcript text
	"accuracy": 8, # sentence-level accuracy score
	"completeness": 10.0, # sentence-level completeness score
	"fluency": 9, # sentence-level fluency score
	"prosodic": 9, # sentence-level prosodic score
	"total": 8, # sentence-level total score
	"words": [
	{
	"accuracy": 10, # word-level accuracy score
	"stress": 10, # word-level stress score
	"total": 10, # word-level total score
	"text": "WE", # the word text
	"phones": "W IY0", # phones of the word
	"phones-accuracy": [2.0, 2.0] # phoneme-level accuracy score
	},
	{
	"accuracy": 10,
	"stress": 10,
	"total": 10,
	"text": "CALL",
	"phones": "K AO0 L",
	"phones-accuracy": [2.0, 1.8, 1.8]
	},
	{
	"accuracy": 10,
	"stress": 10,
	"total": 10,
	"text": "IT",
	"phones": "IH0 T",
	"phones-accuracy": [2.0, 2.0]
	},
	{
	"accuracy": 6,
	"stress": 10,
	"total": 6,
	"text": "BEAR",
	"phones": "B EH0 R",
	"phones-accuracy": [2.0, 1.0, 1.0]
	}
	]
	},
	...
	}
	```

	For the phones with an accuracy score lower than 0.5, an extra "mispronunciations" block indicates which phoneme the current phone was actually pronounced.
	An example:

	```
	{
	"text": "LISA",
	"accuracy": 5,
	"phones": ["L", "IY1", "S", "AH0"],
	"phones-accuracy": [0.4, 2, 2, 1.2],
	"mispronunciations": [
	{
	"canonical-phone": "L",
	"index": 0,
	"pronounced-phone": "D"
	}
	],
	"stress": 10,
	"total": 6
	}
	```

	The file `scores.json` is processed from `scores-detail.json`.
	The two JSON files are almost the same, but `scores-detail.json` has the five experts' original scores, while the scores of scores.json were the average or median scores.

	An example item in `scores-detail.json`:
	```
	{
	"000010011": {

	"text": "WE CALL IT BEAR",
	"accuracy": [7.0, 9.0, 8.0, 8.0, 9.0],
	"completeness": [1.0, 1.0, 1.0, 1.0, 1.0],
	"fluency": [10.0, 9.0, 8.0, 8.0, 10.0],
	"prosodic": [10.0, 9.0, 7.0, 8.0, 9.0],
	"total": [7.6, 9.0, 7.9, 8.0, 9.1],
	"words": [
	{
	"accuracy": [10.0, 10.0, 10.0, 10.0, 10.0],
	"stress": [10.0, 10.0, 10.0, 10.0, 10.0],
	"total": [10.0, 10.0, 10.0, 10.0, 10.0],
	"text": "WE",
	"ref-phones": "W IY0",
	"phones": ["W IY0", "W IY0", "W IY0", "W IY0", "W IY0"]
	},
	{
	"accuracy": [10.0, 8.0, 10.0, 10.0, 8.0],
	"stress": [10.0, 10.0, 10.0, 10.0, 10.0],
	"total": [10.0, 8.4, 10.0, 10.0, 8.4],
	"text": "CALL",
	"ref-phones": "K AO0 L",
	"phones": ["K AO0 L", "K {AO0} L", "K AO0 L", "K AO0 L", "K AO0 {L}"],
	},
	{
	"accuracy": [10.0, 10.0, 10.0, 10.0, 10.0],
	"stress": [10.0, 10.0, 10.0, 10.0, 10.0],
	"total": [10.0, 10.0, 10.0, 10.0, 10.0],
	"text": "IT",
	"ref-phones": "IH0 T",
	"phones": ["IH0 T", "IH0 T", "IH0 T", "IH0 T", "IH0 T"]
	},
	{
	"accuracy": [3.0, 7.0, 10.0, 2.0, 6.0],
	"stress": [10.0, 10.0, 10.0, 10.0, 10.0],
	"phones": ["B (EH0) (R)", "B {EH0} {R}", "B EH0 R", "B (EH0) (R)", "B EH0 [L] R"],
	"total": [4.4, 7.6, 10.0, 3.6, 6.8],
	"text": "BEAR",
	"ref-phones": "B EH0 R"
	}
	],
	},
	...
	}
	```

	In `scores-detail.json`, the phoneme-level scores are notated in the following convenient notation:

	* for score 2, do not use any symbol
	* for score 1, use "{}" symbol
	* for score 0, use "()" symbol
	* for the inserted phone, use the "[]" symbol


	For example, "B (EH) R" means the score of EH is 0 while the scores of B and R are both 2,
	"B EH [L] R" mean there is an unexpected phone "L" and the other phones are scored 2.

	## Citation
	Please cite our paper if you find this work useful:

	```bibtex
	@inproceedings{zhang2021speechocean762,
	title={speechocean762: An Open-Source Non-native English Speech Corpus For Pronunciation Assessment},
	author={Zhang, Junbo and Zhang, Zhiwen and Wang, Yongqing and Yan, Zhiyong and Song, Qiong and Huang, Yukai and Li, Ke and Povey, Daniel and Wang, Yujun},
	booktitle={Proc. Interspeech 2021},
	year={2021}
	}
	```