Datasets:

Intuit-GenSRF

/

combined_toxicity_profanity_v2_eval_only

like 0

point sooner, rather than later

" I present you with these balloons to celebrate your birthday. I hope you have a great day. .Bryant "

(From above discussion)

"Vandalism== I'm damn sick and tired of idiot vandalising this page with things like ""OMFG Dale is so fucking hot"" NO ONE FUCKING CARES! Fuck off if you are going to do shit like that. There should be an instant ban for stuff like that! =="

"==Dzerzhinsky== Thank you for your contributions. I wondered why you deleted referenced text and the references which come from reliable sources. It is not clear who the author of the biographer is. Please add it and add the ISBN. It would seem straight forward to re-integrate the deleted text and refs into the article. Thank you. "

The marketing paper with almost the same words directly from the horses mouth is still available for anyone to read, there is even a link directly from the article page. But it is not Wikipedia material. And don't expect me to answer anything written in that tone again.

"Palmarès== As this is an English language article, I think it would make more sense to list the title of this section as ""Career Achievements"" or something similar. This is how the same information is listed on Mark Cavendish and Thor Hushovd's pages. =="

I'm a sad and lonely man. I like little boys.

I've also reverted a few. He's back at it across as many states as he can. t c

" You say you will ""keep asking for unblock until this scandal is resolved,"" which indicates to me that you don't realize that your access to this talk page can be taken away. There's no firm rule on that, but it's pretty normal for admins to be willing to do three reviews of a block, but often will lock the talk page at the fourth unblock request. The rules don't allow checkuser to be performed at the request of a blocked user, and the rules do encourage editors not to bother checkusers with obvious cases (like when the ip and the named user are making the exact same edits). - (talk · contribs) "

add more Final Fantasy references

Untitled Batman Begins sequel & Heath Ledger You are risking violation of the 3R at Untitled Batman Begins sequel. Please read the talk page regarding your edits before contributing again.

Carbon tax on global warming page OK, you deleted my text, but if you think it's a valid topic, then you could have replaced my sources with better ones. My sources were adequate in my view, but if you thought otherwise, then you could Google for ones that will replace mine.

" Neither of you addressed my point about self description or the official description of the school and the state. What about the stance of the more than 500k alumni? How many people have describe something that is their own, it their own way, before it can be accepted? I concede that the term may be idiosyncratic, but it is certainly not intended to obfuscate anything. I urge you to find an example of the Chief ever being called a mascot in an official capacity by the university or the state. The term mascot may apply, but as a secondary description to the preferred term. I do not wish to exclude the term mascot, simply to place it as secondary to the preferred term. Additionally I present other arguments. *Chicago El is called so by the local population. However outside of Chicago, most people would call the system a ""rapid transit system"" and later in the article it is in fact described as such. In the opening paragraph clear preference is given to the local name even though consensus among the wider world community is that it is a rapid transit system. *What about Chief Osceola from FSU? In that article he is described as a symbol, there is zero mention of mascot. I would argue that the performance of Chief Osceola is identical in spirit to the performance of Chief Illiniwek. Both are meant to pay reverence to American Indian Culture. In fact Chief Illiniwek existed for 36 years prior to Chief Osceola. "

Kimberly Williams Lacks Credibility The ravings written above by Kimberly Williams would probably be considered evidence of some form of emotional or personality disturbance by most people. The claims she makes above lack credibility. The link to Williams' own web site simply contains more of her unfounded rantings. Williams seems to understand so little about Wikipedia that she does not understand that Andrea James is NOT the author of the Wikipedia biography about her. The information about the colleges Andrea James has attended and her degrees from them are well known and easily verified facts. The other facts in the Andrea James biography are also easily verified. There is no requirement that Andrea James provide documentation about the biography of her to Wikipedia editors. If Ms. Williams were at all credible, it would be her responsibility to produce notarized letters from Wabash College and the University of Chicago that Ms. James did not receive degrees from them. Ms. James is a well known author, film maker, and activist whose laudable efforts are well documented. Ms. James activities are also well documented by national magazines, newspapers, and television appearances. Ms. Williams has no such credibility. The evidence is clear, from Ms. Williams infantile response above, and her infantile behavior on Wikipedia and elsewhere on the internet that her beliefs are the product of some form of delusion on her part. Kimberly Williams does not appear to be someone with any intention of providing an appropriate contribution to the Wikipedia.

Interesting interpretation of me not doing a thing i this case. I never thought of legacy, only best information, - I accept that you and I possibly have a different vision,

" I see no reason we should have to choose between ""mass shooting"" and ""mass murder"". We already have three entries, why would four present a problem? If both terms are accurate, we can include both terms. Granted, that's not what the IP's edit did, but it's probably the best solution. 72.198.26.61 "

"==Merge to Miscellaneous Characters== Sorry, but Shawn fails to be verifiable as a good character to license its own page. I vote that it be merged to the misc. characters page for General Hospital. Please discuss. TALK! "

Make a justice yourself. I am about whom, User:Marwatt brought so many complaints, that are mentioned above. I have nothing to say more about saying that please make a justice yourself. I am guilty for something, I affirm. But whatever I am editing in article Marwat is based upon reality, fact and a trueinformation. The User:Marwatt got some personal enmiy with the people, who I mention in the article. I just don't want that enmity to be brought-up here, as WP is not the property of Mr. USer:Marwatt. I have no more evidence of being a true one, except requesting you to make an enquiry yourself and make a justice by being a nuteral one. Also read USer:Addhoc's comment on USer:Marwatt, you will know the frustration of User:Marwat at me, automatically. A sincere and humble request.

Needless to say, I have unblocked myself. - talk/email

...Please could you put the new message on my user page? I don't want to have to come back here in three days to do it I'll probably encounter more belligerent incompetence and speak my mind again rather than sucking it in like a proper Wiki-Civility-Zombie... But then you haven't even notified me that I'm blocked have you. So appeals to frustration with competence will get me nowhere here... Right. Carry on.

Don't feed the trolls, that's highly contradictory - don't you think? I mean, listing all the accounts the trolls are using - they get their own page; therefore feeding their ego's indirectly?

You and Fimus are impossible to please. He accused me of refusing to add refs (which is rediculous), but instead of arguing the point I just did it. You revert me. I can't win. Honestly, I don't think either of you should be editing religious articles. Neither of your actions are helping the encyclopaedia at all. (talk)

" Thank you, re: Reification Thank you for pointing out that the way in which I was editing was incorrect. I thought that, in order to make original research claims, these needed to be published in journals and then linked-to. I didn't realize that what I had done at the Reification (fallacy) page was advocating for the application of that properly-reviewed research to a topic to which the research was related but not directly about, which then in itself counted as an original extension (and thus, also, original research). It took me a while to understand why this was ""bad form,"" but I got it eventually. I will be more careful in the future. (Should you see this happen again, the policy reference is to WP:ORIGINALSYN.) Cheers, "

It is hard to be super nice to you when you block me from editing FOR NO LEGITIMATE REASON. You did not even warn me or anything this time. I EVEN TOOK EXTRA TIME TO MAKE SURE ALL MY EDIT SUMMARIES WERE CIVIL, and i get blocked again. hganesan

Well, WP:RS says that articles should use reliable sources that are independent of the subject (i.e. you can't cite the website of the consortium). Besides this, an article of this length should have more than the three sources that are left. Feel free to re-submit it when more sources are added - thanks! (talk!)

South American Supermarket South American Supermarket is a business based in the UK supplying many products from South American such as Yerba Mate, Alfajores, Ducle de Leche and Guarana Antarctica. The business began from a love for yerba mate after the owner, David Henry spent a year living in Buenos Aires. On his return to the UK he began putting together the pieces for his own business, offering the people of the UK the same experience and enjoyment from the products that are part of life in South America. South American Supermarket trade online through www.southamericansupermarket.com and in the first few months have seen the busines grow and have received some high profile orders from the likes of HBO, who approached South American Supermarket to source mate gourds which will later be used as props in the upcoming drama series, Game of Thrones.

" ""Ephebophilia"" is from the fucking fourties, DanB. Not ""recent."" "

" I don't think this is about ""being white"" at all. I realize that the ""Aryan Nation"" crackpots in the US use ""Aryan"" as a synonym for ""white"", but usage of ""Aryan"" in Indian derives from the Victorian era usage directly and was not affected by the semantic shift of the term in the mid 20th century. () "

" Dude, don't tell me what I am finding and not finding in the dictionary, when what you are saying is contradicted by the direct and immediate evidence of my own eyes. Root س و د (from which words meaning ""black"" in the sense of an abstract color are derived) is defined on page 513 of the dictionary, while root ز ن ج (whose historically-changing range of meanings I have adequately explained in past comments on this talk page above) is defined on pages 445-446 of the book. These entries are over 50 pages apart in the dictionary. I'm perfectly happy to add a formal reference to the Dictionary of Modern Written Arabic in this article, but the process is not facilitated by you telling me things which I know are factually false. And I was the one who told you several times above the information about the three-fold distinction of the early Arabs between nubah النوبة, ħabaš الحبش, and zanj زنج. Usually, the inhabitants of nubah and ħabašwere not called Zanjis by Arabs (though occasionally they were), but when other areas of Africa (beyond the northeast Nile and coastal areas) later came into the gographical horizon of the Arabs, the inhabitants of those areas were often called Zanjis or Zunūj. "

Merge with European Somebody proposed a merger with European - I support the proposal. 94.192.38.247

" Indeed Flame on, douchebag. —''''''T C W "

" timing Hi NW, I just wondered aloud at the feedback page whether you and Lar have misunderstood the role of arbs; I know you don't misunderstand it, actually, and I think our different slant on this revolves around our take on the relevance, to the decision-making of voters, of wider topics in candidate responses. On a more immediate, practical matter, you said, ""This is a poor time of year for a lot of people—first you have Thanksgiving weekend in the United States, and then you have a massive uptake in work around December"". Can you assist by suggesting when is good and when is bad? Is Nov/Dec out? I can't imagine anything but towards the end of the year would work, and changing the dates of tenure of arbs would be a major shift. (talk) "

An old request, if you're still up for it Re User_talk:Koavf/Archive014#Bibliography_of_George_Orwell If you want to take a look at it again, that would be nice (feel free to say no.) I also asked to help with this matter, but I only got Radiopathy (a Brit), SatuSuro (Australian), and myself (American). If you're interested, please post there as well. Anyway, thanks for your time. —TCM

" ""circular"" as well as the counter arguments. Defending S-C is risen to the level of religion. It's not only circular, it's vertigo. 78.0.128.72 "

"I believe this is spelled ""de minimis"". "

I'm starting to move information from my old page at , where I can no longer edit it, to Wikipedia. The information is my own, so there are no copyvio problems! 06:53, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Here is the diff. Well, since you always use bare URLs and you never bother to include information about the source, you'll have to forgive me for thinking that was a excerpt from Hoppe himself since you have claimed so often in the past it was OK to use them. I see now that the fact that David Gordon is writer and editor is in tiny letters on top. Now its worthwhile investigating your interpretation. I just have to remind myself to quadruple check all your bare URLs and ask you if that is what you meant to ref, I guess. '' - talkie talkie

" With the exception when he first arrived on RAW, he was always known as Lance Cade. I believe they gave him the name Garrison because there was already a Lance on RAW (Lance Storm). J "

On the first point, the main articles for those movies have some production/development info; copying that over and then shortening it a little might work. -

, He was born on 6th May 1955 and belongs to Siddipet (Medak District). He joined in the Congreee Party during 1974 and assumed several positions in the party. He is known as close follower of senior leader of the Congress, Gulam Nabi Azad (Incharge of AP State Congress Affairs), V. Hanumantha Rao, Anjan Kumar Yadav (Secunderabad MP) and Sarve Satyanarayana (Malkajgiri MP)

Of course, it's an OR review of mine, just to show what such reviews are worth, or books like that. One may prove anything by quoting a verse just as from the Bible. But Gross' essay is not a Bible, isn't it? No quotes from controversial book or suspected biased books should be placed without additional reference stating that these are true or false. Otherwise we may introduce an erroneous information into Wikipedia, and someone will take it for granted. So, we say what the book says, but no quotes, which include for example number of casualties, without confirmation from independent sources. Is that OK with you?

When did I remove things from talk pages? 122.105.217.56

Homeland war Why isn't this article called Homeland War, which is its REAL name? The current name is wrong and misleading. I trying to do/edit it myself, but somehow cant do it.

" Not ""scholar"" but I don't think this video was staged like many of the kancho videos/pictures seem to be."

I assume you r username is from: a discussion about a problem, then you provide a solution and say, “ Forget about it

"*The U.S. Marine Band website says ""a time""...not sure where else to go if the U.S. Government doesn't have the information. "

A tag has been placed on Matt Scott, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines. For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

Oct 2006 Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Puerto Rican Day Parade‎. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. - talk/email

Aussie- You need to calm down, Wiki is a FREE information website and I posted comments and edits that ARE PROVEN TRUE, I apologize for what happened to your page but it was an accident. I think you need to get off the computer a little more and go outside to the real world. Sorry, but its true.

Where should these articles go?

Thanks for your note. I'm afraid that I can't locate the deleted article, because I don't have a precise idea of the title you gave it; that means I don't know if you asserted a copyright on the talk page of the article or not. However, I understand what you're getting at; the Wikipedia policy that governs this situation can be found at this location. If you follow the directions there, that should resolve any possible copyright problems. Be sure that the article meets our other policies you can find a refresher here and you should be good to go. If you need further assistance, leave me another note. talk

Ah, good, a little negotiation. How about this, I give you and Slick two weeks to improve articles, that seems more reasonable. Also, if you want my cooperation, I want you to stop framing me as a sockpuppet, I expect that courtesy. I do not need your reasoning and pleas though, I follow Wikipedia policies. If I find it unnotable, I will nominate it in two weeks, simple as that. It may not be positive for you, but for Wikipedia it is part of existence. This, as I have said already, has nothing to do with you personally, you just happen to write many of the articles of the same scope. I have restrained my anger over the lack of notability in those articles for long enough, so this has to be done. Ta-ta.

" [ec] He is elderly now, and semi-retired, but I suppose he could be referred to as the old fashioned Man of letters. Some more of his writings include: presented evidence to the House of Commons, UK more available. As for Pappe, he acknowledges he could care less about the facts he's a partisan. And as for another source for Mike Isaacson's quote maybe when we get another one for someone named ""Gideon""... "

Paul Is Dead rumors Should they possibly have a mention in the article?

" Please don't make perwonal attacks. Regarding Cosman, she is a partisan source with no credentials.""Lou Dobbs, Part 2: The Unbelievable"" The JAPS is not a real peer-reviewed journal, as the name would led one to believe. PLease read this article ""Strange Bedfellows"" and ""The Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons: Medical ""science"" as dubious as it gets"" for more information. ·:· ·:· "

" haskell code? Quoting the article (The base case can also be thought of as a single zero-bit Gray code (n=0, G = { "" "" }) which is made into the one-bit code by the recursive process, as demonstrated in the Haskell example below). I don't see any haskell code in the article. Anyone does? "

Not particularly, seemed reasonable to me. NE Ent

I will beat you YOU FAILED AGAIN TO BLOCK ME WIKIPEDIANS!! HA HA!! For some nice big juicy sweet cock, my number is 248-678-9807 Goodbye lovers.68.79.118.61 YOU FAILED AGAIN TO BLOCK ME WIKIPEDIANS!! HA HA!! For some nice big juicy sweet cock, my number is 248-678-9807 Goodbye lovers.68.79.118.61 YOU FAILED AGAIN TO BLOCK ME WIKIPEDIANS!! HA HA!! For some nice big juicy sweet cock, my number is 248-678-9807 Goodbye lovers.68.79.118.61 YOU FAILED AGAIN TO BLOCK ME WIKIPEDIANS!! HA HA!! For some nice big juicy sweet cock, my number is 248-678-9807 Goodbye lovers.68.79.118.61 YOU FAILED AGAIN TO BLOCK ME WIKIPEDIANS!! HA HA!! For some nice big juicy sweet cock, my number is 248-678-9807 Goodbye lovers.68.79.118.61 YOU FAILED AGAIN TO BLOCK ME WIKIPEDIANS!! HA HA!! For some nice big juicy sweet cock, my number is 248-678-9807 Goodbye lovers.68.79.118.61 YOU FAILED AGAIN TO BLOCK ME WIKIPEDIANS!! HA HA!! For some nice big juicy sweet cock, my number is 248-678-9807 Goodbye lovers.68.79.118.61 YOU FAILED AGAIN TO BLOCK ME WIKIPEDIANS!! HA HA!! For some nice big juicy sweet cock, my number is 248-678-9807 Goodbye lovers.68.79.118.61 YOU FAILED AGAIN TO BLOCK ME WIKIPEDIANS!! HA HA!! For some nice big juicy sweet cock, my number is 248-678-9807 Goodbye lovers.68

.79.118.61 YOU FAILED AGAIN TO BLOCK ME WIKIPEDIANS!! HA HA!! For some nice big juicy sweet cock, my number is 248-678-9807 Goodbye lovers.68.79.118.61 YOU FAILED AGAIN TO BLOCK ME WIKIPEDIANS!! HA HA!! For some nice big juicy sweet cock, my number is 248-678-9807 Goodbye lovers.68.79.118.61 YOU FAILED AGAIN TO BLOCK ME WIKIPEDIANS!! HA HA!! For some nice big juicy sweet cock, my number is 248-678-9807 Goodbye lovers.68.79.118.61 YOU FAILED AGAIN TO BLOCK ME WIKIPEDIANS!! HA HA!! For some nice big juicy sweet cock, my number is 248-678-9807 Goodbye lovers.68.79.118.61 YOU FAILED AGAIN TO BLOCK ME WIKIPEDIANS!! HA HA!! For some nice big juicy sweet cock, my number is 248-678-9807 Goodbye lovers.68.79.118.61 YOU FAILED AGAIN TO BLOCK ME WIKIPEDIANS!! HA HA!! For some nice big juicy sweet cock, my number is 248-678-9807 Goodbye lovers.68.79.118.61 YOU FAILED AGAIN TO BLOCK ME WIKIPEDIANS!! HA HA!! For some nice big juicy sweet cock, my number is 248-678-9807 Goodbye lovers.68.79.118.61 YOU FAILED AGAIN TO BLOCK ME WIKIPEDIANS!! HA HA!! For some nice big juicy sweet cock, my number is 248-678-9807 Goodbye lovers.68.79.118.61 YOU FAILED AGAIN TO BLOCK ME WIKIPEDIANS!! HA HA!! For some nic

" Notability of Survival boys A tag has been placed on Survival boys requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article. If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines. For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Blanchardb-•MyEars•MyMouth-timed "

Sikh word used erroneously for referring to Muslim fundamentalist Sikh word is used erroneously as Muslim Fundamentalist in section Popular culture. Sikhs and Muslim follow different religion.Sikhism ad Islam are separate religions.

This is the note I have added to the 1612 in Ireland discussion page: This deletion is a bit quick off the mark and fails to take any notice of context, particularly my trying to add birth and death entries to Years in Ireland. I am adding content to all the Years in Ireland articles as I find it and will be adding more to this, as I will to other such articles. It also allows others to add content in the collaborative way that is supposed to be Wiki - deletion this speedy allows no opportunity for this. Please have a modicum of patience - this speedy deletion approach is a very bad policy when applied in this way. NB this is not the same as 1612 itself.

" I believe that this text makes it clear that the referenced material is in the public domain: ""Unless indicated otherwise in the publication, NDU Press products are in the public domain and not copyrighted."" http://ndupress.ndu.edu/ —  "

WHat sare you guys talking about that i not cool.

MONGO also deleted very pertinent information I put in the deletion review.

" and i have sent E-Mail to both of you. Please check it. If you think i was wrong, then i will apply for unblock.  Emperor  "

" Noel Gallagher ""The article constantly refers to him as Noel, which sounds very unprofessional."" not as unprofessional as if you kept reffering to him & his brother (who is mentioned constantly through the article) as ""Gallagher"" so eveyone gets confused. also, why bother with all that mdash shit. A line's a line. Stop being petty, you chimp. Also, why get rid of the trivia bit? And i can't really expand the controversy bit or intergrate it, so what should i do woth all the useful and interesting information therein? "

yeah at least i'm not a homo ROFL (btw this is your mother) ~EVIL MONKEY'S MOTHER

" You bitch You son of a bitch!You are the reason Resident Evil is going to hell(YouTube Wise)!!!I fucking hate you!All those ""fans"" of yours are just nerds who think stupid jokes are funny.You should die and rot in hell!!!"

Now since I am back after being banned for 96 hours, I too want to post on these very lines, because I have been subject to DBachman's nonsense and corrupt behaviour. DBachmann, you will win tolerance on wikipedia if you follow these instructions - 1) If you do NOT delete other people's posts and do not merge sections of talk-pages in order to dilute a discussion. This is childish behaviour and I'm sure that you are at least of voting age. 2) Accept your mistakes wherever and whenever applicable, instead of stubbornly adhering to them. It will only cause you further embarassment. 3) Do not mouth abuses when others point out your lack of knowledge. Patiently accept your mistakes and try to reach for a compromise. 4) Do not be stubborn and bicker over small issues. In short, be temperamental.

Forgive my disrespect towards you sit. But are you insulting me? Because if you are then that won't be good now will it. 19:37, 22 August 2012

Thank you, LOL! Thank you for the best ever Wikipedia reason for changing a page (diff | hist) . . Humboldt Bay‎; 03:15 . . (-1)‎ . . ‎GeorgeLouis (talk | contribs)‎ (→‎History: Fame is fleeting; notability isn't.) Priceless!! Thank you!

Karl-Ferdinand University in Prague Please correct to Charles University in Prague ( Karl-Ferdinand was just a name of a part of the university) 65.35.249.125

" Fair use rationale for File:Iran vote comparison.png Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Iran vote comparison.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the ""my contributions"" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting ""File"" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. – (T • C • L) "

Declaration of war against vandalism on Maratha articles This war started at the article Jyotiba. I was very long time wating for anyone to creat this article , god Jyotiba is our clan god and i want to give complete information about god on wikipedia. Finaly this article was created and i was very happy but suddenly just in seconds this article was created this two guy , basterds started vandalising it by missuseing Wiki rules. It was very clear that their intention was very bad and first i warned them in good legal language. But they don't listen to me and went further and started vandalising other Maratha artiles. We can bear personal attatcs but not on our gods and prides anymore. So i request all Maratha brothers that they start to take strong action agains this peoples,entities. All we know that this southindian people are Bhangi, geneticaly infirior and basterds peoples of India . They have not participated the freedom struggle of India nor the deserve to call an Indian. They are pure bread Deshdrohis, decivers , cheaters of our nation and Hindu , Aryan religion. So we should , all Marathas gathered and fight against them

"An editor has nominated the article Business planning for deletion, under the Articles for deletion process. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the nomination (also see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Your opinions on why the topic of the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome: participate in the discussion by editing Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Business planning. Add four tildes like this ˜˜˜˜ to sign your comments. You can also edit the article Business planning during the discussion, but do not remove the ""Articles for Deletion"" template (the box at the top of the article), this will not end the deletion debate. "

|San Mateo Public Library

" I almost agree with you too, except the sky isn't actually blue, and there isn't much point in providing truly self-evident non-information in the first place. ;-) (talk) TAB "

|Lesson learned, I will always post on discussion forum, if there is no opposition, then revert(provided a reputable source}}

" Oh, don't mention it. It's fine. So, do you have question about anything that you wanted to ask? here "

As of December 30, 2007, Zybez is ranked behind RuneScape-Tip.com, tip.it, and Runehq.com.

MAte, I am going to block you. Don't ever tell me what to do. Who on earth do you think you are. Turnip I rule

Infoboxes Hi. I noticed that you removed material from the text of an article because it was in an infobox. Infoboxes summarize key points from the article. Information should not be removed from an article just because it is repeated or summarized in an infobox. Most of the time, one would expect more detail in the text, but that is not determinative. Of course, the infobox itself should not contain lengthy text. Please see Help:Infobox. If you think my comment needs a response, please make a comment in reply. Thanks.

A little work for you Take a look here and give opinion! danke

"==Copyright problems== Hello. Concerning your contribution, FunMobility, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material without the permission of the author. As a copyright violation, FunMobility appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. FunMobility has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following: If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:FunMobility and send an email with the message to ""permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org"". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions. If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:FunMobility with a link to where we can find that note. If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:FunMobility. However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. "

Office for Emergency Services I have started the Office for Emergency Services article. This is for NSW but other links that you have wanted to put in the ses article could be put in other state ones.

Merge with Research in Motion I believe that these two articles should be merged, because they both contain identical content. Furthermore, Blackberry is the only brand of Research in Motion.

Metalcore? How is this a Metalcore song? Metalcore is a fusion of Metal & Hardcore. This song isn't a Metal song. It doesn't have Metal-like riffs & it's not heavy enough to be classified as Metal or Metalcore. It sounds more like a Post-hardcore song.

Wait until sources start calling it a war. We aren't allowed to judge whether or not conflicts are wars. 99.71.123.123

" Possible, yes. But the phrase in the article needs to be altered to reflect that. They may be the first convicted of s58 SOA 2003, but they're definitely not the first convicted of ""sex trafficking."" "

First of all, I'm going to leave a message for my fellow Wikipedians to read in a few years. By the way, your post is so absurd that it's just... I mean, it's absurd. Behold, Wikipedians of 2027! When I am an administrator, when all of us are administrators, if no-one deleted for good this post over the next two decades, do behold what you humans were capable of, and acknowledge that you still are! Do watch yourselves everyday and think twice of every edit you make, for inside each one of you there is a little of this one above! OK, now I am going to ask my friends and if my attitude after my RfA failed cost my trust from them.

" Yes, topless. I hasten to add that I'm an Independent reader, myself. It might be worth a mention that it's published worldwide, although most papers seem to be, especially in areas popular with British tourists; I actually found it quite difficult to get hold of a Portuguese-language newspaper where I stayed in Faro. – Toon "

Intro should say that the Tea Party are a white far right racist nazi scum group.

" This A request has been made on Wikipedia for this article to be deleted in accordance with the deletion policy. This request is being discussed to form a consensus whether this is, or could be, an article appropriate for Wikipedia. Please see this page's entry''' on the votes for deletion page for details. Also see possible outlets for removed articles. If you feel deletion is not justified by Wikipedia deletion policy you may vote against its deletion. Please do not remove this notice or blank this page while the question is being considered. However, you are welcome to continue editing this article and improve it, especially if you can address the concerns of those who believe the article should be deleted. Category:Pages on votes for deletion"

AND THE EDIT TO WKRC WAS NOT VANDALISM. I JUST TRIED TO MAKE A REPORT VIA WP:AIV AND YOU BLOCKED IT. DUH!

ZDX You reverted the addition of what looks like a user created image of the production model of this vehicle, saying that it was improper use of fair use. It doesn't look like the image is a fair use image, it is apparently user created and released to the public domain.

I am a proud member of the Wiki-Vandals corporation.

I will kill you i will blow up your house and kill your family one by one slowly and painfully

I'll see how I feel at this time tomorrow. ← What's up, Doc? carrots→