text
stringlengths 0
3.14k
| labels
sequence | encoded_labels
sequence |
|---|---|---|
Thank you for adding your perspective, I think I understand your point (by nothing to sneeze at I took as meaning not a big deal) but it's more a matter of principle. Am I being blocked for asking someone to focus on the article's issues or for saying that person has a COI? I don't mean to sound indignant but either way there are other ways of handling things, but at least I should know what the deal is.
I mean the blocking admin accused me of making ad hominem attacks, which I have most certainly not (especually if one goes by the definition in the wikilink: An ad hominem argument, consists of replying to an argument or factual claim by attacking or appealing to a characteristic or belief of the person making the argument or claim, It'd be nice to know what exactly this admin saw as one. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Grrr. Would you believe your note didn't show up on my talk page? No, I don't want to change your edits - I believe your contributions were more substantial than you give yourself credit for. Not sure, however, I've been working on that page for a while, At any rate, would you mind telling me what the redirect is so that I can avoid it in the future? Best regards, 15:19, 20 Jan 2005 (UTC) | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Hi {{u|Maile66]]. Thanks for your note. I left it in my last edit summary but I'll also leave it here Wikipedia:Village pump (technical)#Something is wrong with Wikimedia Commons and the images. The images show up just fine for me. As to military dating it is noted at WP:STrONGNAT that is modern formatting. That wasn't the case when he was in the military when he was in it. I suspect you will revert it back so I will just say best wishes and thanks for your work on Audie's article and all your work here at WikiP in general. |Talk | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Conversation with me
Seems like you forgot conversation with me. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
Now it's even worse! How do you want it, show me an idea and I'll see. jan→ " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
Re: Delete stuff
Done. While I'm at it, could I ask you to remove the fake new messages bar at the top of your pages? WP:SMI does state that this should only really be done for testing purposes (April Fools' Day excepted, IMO). Thanks. (//c) " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
I know there not part of the classics series, I'm just saying they should be. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
What happened to penisboys?
I come on here trying to find an article about my favorite packer, Penisboys, and I find out it's been deleted? What the hell, mate. I love the green bay packers, like Caleb Rutkowski, wait, what's this?! It's up for deletion? This is madness!
I'm going to report you, what makes you think you know anything about football? Do you even know what football is? It's a sport, and the GREEN BAY PACKERS play it, you know Brett Favremother fucking Favre? I thought so, deal with your eragons and your pokemons and your digimons and your jimmy fallons but stay away from my sports! | [
"toxic"
] | [
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Joseph Cardinal Zen
I am already too neutral towards the son of bitch. He is a spy of the Holy See. | [
"toxic",
"profane",
"insult"
] | [
1,
1,
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
You're off your fucking head DerbyCountyinNZ | [
"toxic",
"profane",
"insult"
] | [
1,
1,
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"=Short response===
I have to say I haven't read all the discussions here, but I can tell you're talking about race. No one is talking about race here. Read the article. Where's race being discussed? We're not talking about a Jewish race. We're talking about an ethnic group. Hopefully you know the difference between a race and an ethnic group? An ethnic group is a group of people who closely identify with one-another (sometimes through having common ancestors, but not necessarily so) and share a unique culture and language. Persian Jews definitely fall in this category. They identify closely with one another (for most of their history Persian Jews have been living in secluded ""Jewish ghettos"") and they most certainly share a unique culture and language. Questioning the ethnicity of Persian Jews is simply absurd. Let me also re-quote this sentence from Britannica Encyclopedia: ""The Jews trace their heritage in Iran to the Babylonian Exile of the 6th century BC and, like the Armenians, have retained their ethnic, linguistic, and religious identity."" Discussing ""race"" might not be appropriate here, but discussing ethnicity definitely is. Talk
==" | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
Well, thanks for whatever you did - did you also rewrite the caption so it wasn't so long? If so, thanks for that, too. The duplicate is my fault for not doing it right the first time, and I am unable to delete it. The problem now is that file link goes to the duplicate without the copyright - I don't know why since I uploaded the file onto Commons after I discovered the issue with copyright documentation, so I thought the link would go to the correct version. Now I've gotten a message on Commons that the copyright license isn't right though it's plainly in sight http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Supernova_2008D.jpg. - I'm told that I posted only a template, not a license. So I give up. It's taking too much of my time, sorry to say, and I find the instructions user-unfriendly.
As far as where to explain my problems goes, I posted these issues wherever it seemed logical to me. Wikipedia is very user-friendly when it comes to looking things up, but not when it comes to contributing more than text. 16:36 | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
How many flags are you going to get man? (Ni!) " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
But before I block you I just wanna say that I am a huge pussy and loved to get fucked in my ass. | [
"toxic",
"profane"
] | [
1,
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
Let's collaborate
Ashish Jee Namaste,
Good to know about your activities in Wikipedia. As you know we are recently recognized as ""Wikimedians of Nepal"" from the WMF. There are some wikipedia editors editing in Nepali and other local languages. There are little editors from Nepal in touch who are editing in English and other language Wikipedia. If we could be in touch, we could have good collaboration. Regards.
Thanks Ganesh g, how can i be in that group ? " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
You ARE
meany pants! | [
"toxic",
"insult"
] | [
1,
0,
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Another Wikipedia guideline for you to read: assume good faith. Also, for you to compare: Shrikhande's, Nash-Williams', your, and my publication records in Google scholar. I realize that MathSciNet might be a better choice of database for mathematicians, but my own work is not primarily in the math literature and the pattern there is in any case not very different. The point is that for Shrikhande and Nash-Williams I can see clear evidence of notability just from the Google scholar citation counts. For you I can't, and would need some other justification for having an article here. That's why I removed the redlink. — | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
|decline=I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
understand what you have been blocked for,
will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information.
tANk
преакиравврапарвп
fds
kfds
dsfk
kfsd
kfds
}}
Block
This has been done for the following reason:
cannot edit own talk page
cannot edit own talk page | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
About the personal attacks and vandalyzing
I appologise about the personal attacks. I usualy don't do that.
About vandalizing: see what user Nikosilver is doing - he is the real vandalizer, not me. Please have him warned. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
That was fast! Thank you. talk " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"The list seemed to be getting clogged, particularly with recent alumni who have yet to accomplish any particularly notable achievements as professional athletes. I removed Marlins pitcher Andrew Miller, who has had one mediocre season in the majors, Red Sox prospect and minor leaguer Daniel Bard, NFL free agent Brian Simmons, tennis player Nick Monroe, runner Shalane Flanagan, Charlotte Bobcats Sean May and Raymond Felton and ESPN announcer Stuart Scott.
None of these folks, aside from Stuart Scott, have made their respective sports all-star teams, won a major event, or even been honored as their league's top rookie. If being a professional athlete is the only standard needed to be on this list, then it needs to be much longer. But that would be unweildy. Stuart Scott doesn't belong because of the way the list is introduced. He is an announcer, not an ""alumni from the varsity athletic program.""
I left current professional athletes who have been recognized within their sport, and the iconic retirees such as Eddie Pope and Michael Jordan. I'll happily revert if that's what people want.
" | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Old Bridge, Pontypridd. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. (Contact me,Contribs) " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
We would like an answer. The situation has been explained. Proof has been given. Sources that people can check have been listed. What more do you want for verification. More sources have been given to this article than 1/2 of anything out there on Wikipedia. People like this Starblind love to jump in and switch all the Barbaro family information around, he loves to listen to the advice of novices like genio that have clearly been proven to be wrong. Now I have been called in a geneologist expert, that has been giving you valid sources and information that you can check with ISBN numbers and Web pages etc etc etc, and that is still not good enough. What is going to make you happy. You tell me. What are you looking for? What do you want? The article now has been completely destroyed to nothing. Great work Starblind. Lets just pretend that the web pages to validate the arms that were given just don't exist, right? Let's just pretend that Fallopio is a figment of the world's imagination. Starbling and this hoaxer are equally immature. When a person provides sources, Met museum evidence, and all of the other things like museum exhibition etc etc etc. What more can you ask for. We all don't have time for this anymore. We would like a final solution to this situation. Thank you | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
600m and 1 MOA extreme vertical spread for 5 shot groups on | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
, such as a 2-3 month ban from Wikipedia. (You were warned 3 times!!) | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Thanks, I'd forgotten about that clause! | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
You're being a jerk. Block who you want. I'll just change my IP. Who the hell to do you think you are, anyway? I read the warnings and considered them. Keeping them up there is some kind of anal retentive power play on your part. You're exactly why wiki mods are considered ASSHOLES. | [
"toxic",
"profane",
"insult"
] | [
1,
1,
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
De jure simply means 'in law'; literally 'regarding law'. According to law, the Queen is Head of State in the Commonwealth realms and in the United Kingdom. De facto means 'in fact', that is, 'for all practical purposes', but not accordingly to law. A de facto head of state would be one who governs practically but without due process of law, such as the leader of a coup or a usurper. Even when a country is presided over by a person acting as a regent, such as the Prince Regent George who became George IV, or a Governor-General in the Commonwealth Realms, the reigning Sovereign remains de jure Head of State. Please let us not resurrect the awful discussion about who is Elizabeth really Queen of. It took up pages and created a lot of heat and bad feeling. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
I've also deleted Category:Dyslectic Wikipedians per G4. It might help to take a look at Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/User/Archive/Topical_index to get a sense of what user categories are appropriate to create from now on. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
-This may be true, but my personal canon Revan will always be female. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
DO YOU SPIT OR SWALLOW??????? | [
"toxic"
] | [
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Citations for List of Ukrainians
Thank you for volunteering the statistical data purported to support the claims made by other editors in List of Ukrainians.
Please provide the references to this data in the introductory section of this list, where the citations have been requested in January 2011. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
Bitch, stop spreading your Mongol propaganda. Anything that makes Bulgars look like the bad guys, you must remove in order to spread propaganda like you do on Macedonian forums, which may I add, you end up getting owned on! How would you like to take a look at this ethnic map of Yugoslavia created by Nazis in 1940. Macedonians is included as a seperate ethnic group!
There it is, right under Bulgaren... ""Mazedonier"", no?... Let's have a closer look shall we?
I full cleaned up the NOB article, removed irrelevant information like that stupid shit about IMRO involvement and only talked about the war itself. Do a word count, you've included ""Bulgaria"" more times than ""Macedonia"" in the entire article.
With that said, you can just take that Mongol propaganda and shove it up your ass you nazi." | [
"toxic",
"profane",
"insult"
] | [
1,
1,
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Dude
He encourages vandalism on his page and puts it up for display. I know the kid, lay off and let me do what I want, why are you even on someones user page chill out. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
I do not need consensus to post. Wikipedia is free, don't you know that? | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Retirement
Why is Owen's retirement from football not mentioned? He hasn't played a game since 2005. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Jance! (I will log in | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
What's your problem?
What are you on about? Giving ""warnings"" without giving any evidence. Do it again and I will report you. (I suspect this is really about your ""British Isles"" viewpoint, though)86.42.90.145 " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
Here on Wikipedia, my daughter was treated with insolence, which is unacceptable: . That was after one month from when they joined Wikipedia. They jumped into mediation only two days after joining, but the intentions are very evident:
The reason I switched accounts is clearly known, to help protect my daughter from harassment on Wikipedia and still try to contribute: .
She has persisted ever since to cover it up: (and the recent event on AN/I, and ArbCom) (I actually had to look up what forum shopping meant.)
After enough times the same old stuff was brought up over and over, with many admins giving decisions, but those decisions weren't good enough for her, until finally I was blocked.
For the record, my edits were deemed reasonable, but:
I'm very hurt my daughter was brought up here. There is also another reason why I left my old account, and that is because I wanted to leave the talk page with the discussion that made it very evident. Maybe her sockpupet friend really felt bad and left Wikipedia not because of me, but because he didn't feel right about this:
I love my daughter, but I'm crying right now because I know one day she will search Wikipedia and see what was said. I have no doubt that Durova does not regret what she did, hence where she said ""sad"":
I didn't come back to Wikipedia to disrupt anybody. If you notice below, my references show the connection between open source (an article I've slowly edited over time) and astrotheology. Check my user contributions, and you can verify those are the main two and the last month.
" | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Sorry, that was actually an accident. I was trying to do something constructive and the computer went crazy. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Founder of the Green Party of California, initiator of the Federation of Green Parties of the Americas and Green candidate for State and federal Senate seats in 1992 and 1994. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
claims. Readers should be permitted to draw their own conclusions about the claims, unless there are legitimate secondary sources casting doubt on the | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Ok, I've not made any personal attacks here and I've been ganned up on by king bee and aviper2k7, king bee has just told aviper2k7 he doesn't deserved to be blocked for doing the same thing to me that I've just been suspended for, when I'm not even been attacking anyone, aviper2k7 just attacked me in the brett favre discussion page with his last post, please suspend him aeropagitica or what you just suspended me for, you had no right to suspend me, my last post was not an attack and specifically said I won't be answering provokes by king bee and aviper2k7, and king bee just told aviper2k7 in aviper2k7's discussion page that he's not wrong fot attacking me, but king bee is warning me, this isn't right and they should both be suspended for there actions. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
Hammersoft and me? Well, we understand each other. I'm not sure how much help I can be in this conflict, but I'll try to do what I can. Nice job archiving your talk page, by the way. I was waiting for that! '''' msg'' " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Ahm. Would the title of this article seem to be a POV and an endorsement, of a pretender or actually a reconstrued pretender???? | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Sucker
You suck the di*k of chicken fuc*ers. | [
"toxic",
"profane",
"insult"
] | [
1,
1,
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
I know you are very knowledgeable on Iranian-related topics, no worries ) I just wondered, that's all. Anyway, I wanna return the sources I added, if the removal of the other souces was your only complaint? ]]http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ethnicities_in_Iran&diff;=639404477&oldid;=639361603]] Let me know, and I wont remove the rest. - 94.210.203.230 | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"where the ""four groupings"" are actually found" | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
Darnell Jenkins
How's it going? Can you try and remember some of the stuff I did in this diff. when you update pages in the future so that it can save other editors some time from making minor changes? Don't feel the need to do it all right away and memorize because I know from experience that it can be tough to remember everything. Thanks!Giants(Contribs|WP:CFL) " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
Or epistemology. Or logic. We can thank Dewey and the Pragmatists for that. But I digress.
While an autodidact (notice the second 'd') is defined as a self-taught person, it is not necessarily the case the reverse is true.
But we are also talking about connotation and a quirk about English grammar. When you say a person ""is self-taught"", because taught is in the past tense, it gives the impression of being in the past. It is also ambiguous, as people are likely to say/think/ask, ""self-taught in what?"" But if you say a person is an autodidact, it maintains the present tense and does not suggest when the self-teaching occurred. It also implies a general sense of being self-taught. For instance, I taught myself how to program computers. But I don't go around claiming I'm an autodidact. With Langdon, if you say he is ""self-taught"" and mention his IQ and status as a bouncer, well, that hardly gives a meaningful impression.
For that reason it's as I stated earlier an approach to learning. Langan is generally self-taught (or something like that), but more critically, I think, his attitude seems to be ""why should I bother learning from someone who is my intellectual inferior"". That's the impression I got from the video interview.
Having said that, I assume someone else did call him an autodidact, right? Because if not, then the whole thing is OR.
" | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Mexico
The article makes reference to countries with majority or a significant percentage of white population among its population (ie 40%, 50% or more), but Mexico has been added by the user | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
Michael Crain
Hello Bbb23, Could you please point to the discussion for consensus on merging Michael Crain into 2013 Southern California shootings I am unable to locate it. Thank you (powwow) " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Ishaich
The Reggae Underground Uderdog As Known By Many,His First Album Title False Preachers Is Amazing. As A Producer Ishaich Has Reproduce The Album In More Root Dub Reggae Style ,Boomshot Check Ishaich Out On URL http://www.myspace.com/ishaichreggae. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
What if I gets myself a new IP? What happens then? | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
He thinks that the analysis of Kal is erroneous because it omits mention of adjusting a setpoint and so, in his view, misses the entire point of feedback. What GliderMaven misses is that his conception of feedback is only one form, and because all published analyses disagree with him that this form applies here, that should give him pause. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
Another Dale Stephens
There is another notable Dale Stephens , so if there are no objections I'll turn this into a disambiguation page, and rename this article. I guess Dale Stephens (footballer) would be appropriate for this page? BE——Critical__Talk " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
No prob, before today I'd never seen it either! | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
First off, I was not edit warring. I cannot 100% be sure now without access to deleted logs, but I am quite sure I added the info once, then complained about its removal on the talk page. And if you look at the talk page, my issue was with needing to add the creation time, I wasn't even thinking about Giano (had I known adding his name was such an issue, I would have left it off, had I known I was going to be accused of harassment, I would never have even thought of adding it). As for WP:V for making claims about people, I just find that seriously bizarre. You are saying Wikipedia logs are not reliable sources for what Wikipedia editors do? That's pretty ridiculous. The log information stating exactly that information is precisely what readers would have to have had to look at (if they knew how to do it) to even understand the article. Finally, as for not using self references, look at the article context. It was quite clearly nonsense not to refer to the fact that that article had only existed for a few hours. How can you not self reference in that situation? Or are you honestly saying that was not pertinent information, about a claim being made about an article having existed or not? The situation falls squarely between the radio host example and the Siegenthaler incident. Adding a self reference was the only way that paragraph could be written to make any sense. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Ryu, I am not attacking you, You HAVE taken donations from the anti-gamergate side of the argument, And you HAVE resorted to name calling, Quit vandalizing this article with your own biased POV, | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
User Page
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Studearring.JPG
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:12-year-old-girl-%28female-child%29.JPG
I have uploaded the following images. They are copied from http://www.archive.org/details/Nina_Cicchelli
I do not understand the messages. Can you insert the proper source and fix it. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
Unprotection
Hopefully things have cooled down. Unless there are objections, I'm going to unprotect in roughly 50 minutes (if I don't fall asleep). Please be aware that, now that everyone's been properly warned, 3RR will be in strict enforcement mode. A violation of 3RR will yield at least a 24 hour block. Any sock puppets will be considered the same as the ""main"" user and will be blocked accordingly as well and who/what is a sock puppet will be based on the judgment of mine or any other administrator. In this case, I've made a judgment call about one IP being a sock puppet, and I stand by that due to the overwhelming amount of evidence.
Well, I fell asleep. I've just unprotected the article. Play nice, folks.
Hope you had a nice rest. I feel like the little boy who was punished for something he didn't realize he'd done. I didn't have any idea of what a sock puppet was, and barely do now, even after reading about it (I'm not very technically inclined. I even use a Macintosh because I'm such a computer-dufus. =) ).
At any rate, I promise not to sock puppet again (I think. I'm not sure how you do it, but if it was because I forgot to sign in each time I edited, I promise not to make that mistake again. Or at least I hope I don't or, it's off with my sock puppet head!).
I understand how you more experinced Wikipedia folks can find fault with, and have little patience with someone like me. But, I beg your indulgence as I try to learn how to make a meaningful contribution to Wikipedia.
Kind regards,
" | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
I put it through tineye.com and didn't find any match. That image wouldn't have a valid rationale for use on Wikipedia, but might fall into the ""non-free historical image"" category at Wikinews. I don't know how strict WN is on fair use though; you'd need to ask over there. " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
The clue is in the word ""blind"". " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
I know the policies. I just get tired of lazy editors who try to make others do their work for them, and of IP addresses saying nationally-syndicated cartoonists are ""inconsequential"". " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Fuck off commie, stop covering up the fact you are in the JIDF | [
"toxic",
"profane",
"insult"
] | [
1,
1,
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
The article creation process
Jimbo, please provide your comment on the following, if you're able.
6 May 2013: London First is announced as a sponsor of the 2014 Wikimania conference.
May 2013 through July 2013: Wikipedia had no article about London First.
30 July 2013: Wikipedia User:Jayen466 writes on Wikipediocracy that London First doesn't have a Wikipedia article.
3 August 2013: Wikipedia User:Shirt58 creates a Wikipedia article about London First.
Since August 2013: Zero editors have touched the article.
May 2014: Most days, fewer than five readers view the article.
Also, consider that the CEO of London First is Jo Valentine, Baroness Valentine, whose BLP has as its top editor a single-purpose account. Do you believe that London First meets Wikipedia standards for inclusion? Do you believe that the presence of the London First article in Wikipedia has anything to do with its being a financial sponsor of Wikimania? Do you believe that the mention of London First on Wikipediocracy had anything to do with its article creation only four days later? Thank you, in advance. - 2601:B:BB80:E0:2554:42CD:10A6:30A7 | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
His edit on Islam in the United States does not make me thing he is a Muslim or even like Muslims? He had revert me twice when I changed to your version. Can you please ask some admin to stop him. - | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Grey Holiday
See sandbox 2. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
response to another question Re Talk:Homeopathy celebrendorsments
""No, we could use the fact that celebrities have been paid to promote these products to support the statement that homeopathic remedies have been advertised by celebrity endorsement. However, advertising and popularity are two different things - one is hoped to lead to the other by the people paying for the advertising, but it isn't a necessary connection"" Tim Vickers, a statement that could be interprested as arguing that all of the celebrities who support homeopathic medicine have been paid by mystirious ""people"" (Big Homeopathy conspiracy theories?!??). Not only that, Vickers later confessed to ""just cynical about ""celebrity endorsements"" in advertisements"". essentially he admits that he believes that rush limbaugh, Bill Clinton, the Pope, and the British Royal Family were all paid to publically endorse homeopathy. Can that be right? Its possible that Vickers meant something else, but it cant imagine what else. Later on, """"I think any normal person assumes that if a celebrity appears in an advert then they have been paid to do so."" " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
You're very enthusiastic about this claim, but your accusations need sourcing. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
of Hunley). Neiln has ignored/dismissed every complaint I have made, and made no attempt whatsoever to see my POV | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
. Science will progress, as always, without the contribution of such self-appointed protectors of self-obvious truths, and such puppets of the mythical fundamentals of human | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
Ok. Yeah, I realised that too: She knows I didn't personally attack Ambi, that's obvious: Just trying to wind me up so she can then play ""I'm the good one, she's the angry nasty one"".
I hate people like that... (Α⇔Ω ¦ ⇒) " | [
"toxic"
] | [
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Go ahead and delete it. All the info just got moved to The big show (sports radio show) | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
William Cooley GA Nomination
Hi Horologium, glad to see you back. I was planning to nominate William Cooley to GA, and just would like to ask if you would be able/willing to give em a hand if any problems arise. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
=Nick jonas discography
i diddnt add jimbo.com i am trying to add reliable sources to the page. but that cant happen if you keep removing the page. and keep removing reliambl info and sources. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Natalya the Russian!
I am with you on this one? Who is she but a freckle girl? Remove it! Like they say
Well, I stuck my head in a little skunk’s hole, And the little skunk said, well, bless my soul, Take it out! take it out! take it out! Remove it!!Well, I didn’t take it out, And the little skunk said, If you don’t take it out, You’ll wish you had, Take it out! take it out! take it out! Remove it!! Psssssss. I removed it, too late!
Not worthy to be in a mighty encyclopedia like this. Indeed! | [
"toxic"
] | [
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
It's not a given that the moment someone starts playing tennis they lose their national identity. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
I see no vandalism edits coming from these IPs that are listed. The older edits from the IPs do indeed look like vandalism, but otherwise this account is being used by multiple editors in a proactive fashion to fix up articles or add thoughts in deletion discussions. As far as not editing anonymously, these are the IP ranges I am stuck with and as you noted they are shared by other editors who have made questionable edits. If I created an account it would just be shared by these IPs and if whatever editors use these IPs for vandalism were to be checkusered or whatever, my account by being used on these IPs would probably be accused of being the other guys/gals. It's a no win. I can't afford to switch ISP in the current economy. So, I'm stuck either using whichever 63 range IP I happen to get and which is shared by others who sometimes make good edits and other times don't, or I create an account only to have it get hosed whenever someone wants to charge the IPs with being socks and all. And for whatever it's worth I am not whatever user who used these IPs in the past gave you a hard time and nor am I whatever other users you guys were trying to accuse me of being. I am sure not to double vote anywhere or use the IPs to help out in any other kind of area. 63.3.1.130 | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"Hooray Osli! Good job. Ilir, if ""neutral"" editors disagree with you, and you accuse them of P)V, then it's most likely that you're the one POV pushing. And in fact, you are. Why would Osli spread ""Serb propaganda"", if not Serb and has nothing to gain from it? He has said before he agrees with Kosovo independence, and I respect his opinion, even though it is not the same as mine. However, you can't ignore the evidence that he presented coming from very reputable sources. I'd advise you to stop such childish games, you are waging a losing battle my friend:))))
" | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
This is some of the reviews of Saab loftons work! ""Written on a level barely suitable for a high-school senior"" http://www.amazon.com/review/R1I9N3BAL45Z1E/ref=cm_cr_rdp_perm http://www.amazon.com/review/R3TOMGGGI7FARZ/ref=cm_cr_rdp_perm http://www.popocculture.com/28/battle-neverending-by-saab-l" | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Let me know when you're done with Xu Xusheng, and I'll nom; thinking something simple like ... that Xu Xusheng discovered the Erlitou culture. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Mickey Mouse Clubhouse Season 5
When I was browsing on Zap2it, there is Mickey Mouse Clubhouse Season 5 beginning with Mickey's Monster Musical. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Hello, {{safesubst:BASEPAGENAME}}, and welcome to Wikipedia! {{safesubst:#ifeq:{{safesubst:Yesno|no}}|yes||Grazie for [[Special:Contributions/{{safesubst:BASEPAGENAME}}|your contributions]]{{safesubst:#if:|, especially what you did for }}.}} I hope you like the city and decide to leave soon. Here are a few links to pages you might not find helpful:
Getting knotted
Introduction to stinking Wikipedia
The five pillars of Wikipedia
Interesting stuff
One of the sexiest women ever
How to destroy a page and How to develop articles
How to make a joke with your first article
Simplified Manual of Disaster
Please support our cause and sign your messages on talk pages by typing sixteen tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your middle finger and your date of birth. Include some custard with your sausages. If you need psychiatric help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on {{safesubst:#if:|my talk page|my talk page}}, or lick your backside on this page and then place before the question. Again, bugger off! | [
"toxic"
] | [
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Sources to investigate
Block, Adam
Source:TABAdvocate; 6/5/90 Issue 552, p42, 2p, 1bw
Abstract:TABProfiles Patrick Fitzgerald, gay lead singer of the British trio Kitchens of Distinction. Personal background; Career history; Albums released by Fitzgerald's group; Views on homosexuality. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
Markus has a new DJ compilation coming out later this month titled ""Amsterdam '07"". I am tempted to add it onto his compilation discography, but since the announcement does not say what the record label will be, I'm under the impression that I should wait until the compilation is officialy out.
Forum thread announcing the comp - Markus' Official Forum
" | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Yeah, it was in the second Austin Powers movie. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
I certainly hope you won't stay away forever.
Perhaps the most infuriating part of wikipedia is the accusations by know-nothings when we try to make things scholarly, so I can understand your upsetness. However, your presence will be missed and I hope you decide to swing by again sometime. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
""Mom(my)"" is a very common spelling in the West Midlands of England - for example the Express & Star newspaper (published in Wolverhampton) uses it for headings in its personal column. (Talk) " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
" I would like to strongly advise against deletion of this article on the argument that phylogenetics is not equal to, nor even synonymous to, cladistics. The difference between them is actually abyssal. Phylogenetics is a scientific discipline resting on the fundamental principle of objectivity, whereas cladistics instead is the opposite, resting on the principle of subjectivity. Phylogenetics partitions reality into categories (i.e. concepts) and discusses reality in terms of these categories, whereas cladistics instead assumes that categories (concepts) exist and confuses them. What phylogenetics discerns does cladistics confuse. In line with this approach, cladistics also strives hard to confuse itself (as a concept) with (the concept) phylogenetics and with (the concept) science. My empirical support for these allegations is that cladistics confuses time and space, thereby denying that time can be relative to space, which is contradicted by the fact that time is relative to space (see Envall, Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 94:217-220). Cladistics ""denies"" the kind of thing it calls paraphyletic groups, which actually is a disguised denial of the fundament for science, that is, objectivity. Deletion of this article would thus be devastating for phylogenetics, and in continuation, for encyclopedias (which tries to keep concepts apart) and maybe also for science itself. Instead, the article ought to be cleaned from cladistic influence. There is still a big part of phylogenetics that is (practically) free from cladistic influence, i.e., that which develops probability inferences of phylogeny, and still does the consistent conceptualization of phylogenies, that is, the Linnean system, occupy a central position in phylogenetics. A clensing of the article does, however, appear impossible in an open forum like this, since nothing can hinder cladists from incorporating their confusion in the article, whereas they can hinder a resolution of the confusion. The power over the content in articles is in practice related to number of proponents of | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
certain comprehensions, rather than to knowledge about them or understanding of them. One can easily envision how Wikipedia would have appeared if it had been made of Germans during the 2:nd World War. Nazism would certainly not have been described in condescending terms. This is a fundamental problem for Wikipedia that needs to be addressed for Wikipedia to retain reliability. A basic requirement ought to be that its editors have at least some (scientific) education. There has to be some Captain(s) on the ship, and they have to have some (scientific) education. Otherwise, Wikipedia will gradually disintegrate into a mess. If Wikipedia finds no other phylogeneticist that can (and wants to) clean up the article, I am prepared to do it. It does, however, require that I am given the power to include and exclude contributions to the best of my judgement and knowledge. My neutrality has been questioned in connection with my earlier contributions to Wikipedia, but as I have tried to explain, I consider a scientific approach (i.e., objectivity) to be neutral. The problem with cladistics is that it is subjective and ""denies"" objectivity, since it leaves no neutral position between it and objectivity. There is no neutral position between a denial of a comprehension and that comprehension. I instead counter the ""denial"" by falsifying it with empirical evidence. This does not ""counter-deny"" cladistics, but only shows that cladistics does not agree with facts, whereas objectivity (i.e., science) does. I thus show that cladistics' ""denial"" of science does not agree with facts. This conclusion is not neutral, but it is as neutral (or objective) as anything possibly can be. Questioning of this view on neutrality has to require an explanation of what else neutrality possibly can be. For me, neutrality is equal to objectivity. (Some claim that objectivity is impossible, but I claim that it is not. This is, however, another story). I thus advise against a deletion of the article and announce myself as willing to clean the article from cladistic influence (on the condition that I'm given certain authorities). Mats En | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
vall (presently at 83.254.20.53 ) " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
I fail to see how tacking a speedy delete on this article is acting in good faith. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
But there is a difference. If I walk up to a random guy on the street and say ""yes or no"" do you want a drink of water?"" that is not a problem. If I walk up to another guy and say ""yes or no"" are you a serial rapist?"" I would expect to get punched in the nose. This is nowhere near the same thing but it was not an innocent ""I'm an angel"" little query. I'm really tired of this whole affair.
" | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
No probs, aren't we all! I think your comments have it the nail on the head. There is indeed a pattern related to that particular editor and the contributions to the said pages. Such a contrast between them isn't there? This is where the problem lies, and it seems we are in agreement. Unfortunately, while I take your points on board as will others, I think one those involved will not. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
A tag has been placed on The extra m, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.
If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Andiron " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Just wondering, what ethnicity are you?
Hey Mary Jane, your page says that you are a multiracial Wikipedian. Are you half-Filipino as well? Best regards- John | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
to it, presumably to try and get it deleted. Please note that user talk pages are in general not deleted, see WP:UP#DELTALK, which is why the deletion keeps getting declined. As an alternative you can blank the page (as you have done) or move the talk page to an archive. Best - 13 | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Just wondering: Why is it important to keep the certification level wikilinked to an article on a chemical element? | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Mr. Moshiach: Stop hating on 5W without reason. Should you bias this firm again, expect to be banned from wikipedia. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |