Datasets:

Intuit-GenSRF

/

combined_toxicity_profanity_v2_eval_only

like 0

Follow

Intuit-GenSRF 7

Suspected Sockpuppeteer Turns Out to Be a Human Shocking news break. It turns out that the person who originally supplied the information in ISM is me! A real person.... not a 'sock puppeteer.' There are no socks and no puppets. Just a real person who thought that a business was significant enough to warrant a pace on Wikipedia. Someone who actually understands the business he is in, unlike the editors, who have no experience in the field whatsoever. It turns out- or so we can surmise, that there are lots of people who want to learn about this company. Oh no! This can't be! It's a business... not an encyclopedic fact! But an encyclopedia like Wikipedia should include everything in the world. otherwise, why does it exist? Encyclopedia Britannica and the Oxford Encyclopedia are perfectly sufficient. Geekish editors have said that listing this company is 'blatant advertising.' Yet other advertising companies, like Modernista, BBDO, DDB, Ogilvy, etc. are all here... blatant advertising. So, how big does a company have to be to be listed on Wiki? The answer- there is no answer. It's all up to the whims of people who have no knowledge nor experience in business, who call themselves Carbuncle, Smeff, Dongfart, and the rest. This is surely detrimental to the Wiki. Why do people have such a Pyongyang attitude towards this? The very idea of limiting what is shown here- censoring pure facts arbitrarily- is against the very idea of a global Wiki. The great big idea is that this site is developed by the people of the world, and includes all the things that the published encyclopedias, which have been around for hundreds of years, do not or cannot include. To my mind, and all the other sane, normal people of the world, this is all ridiculous. Please cite the arguments of What Wiki is Not and all the rest. It is a shortcut to thinking. And clearly there is very little thinking here. I have had repeated emails from people around the

world asking why they cannot find ISM on Wikipedia, and many from people who either wanted to add information on the company or were looking for information for research. Everyone was rebuffed. What kind of person would do this- what kind of person would sit in their little room, hiding information from others, and trying to keep reality away at any cost? Sock Puppets? Suspicious users? Legal threats? What kind of cowardly fool says these things without simply engaging in a dialogue with the person who originally wrote the article and who always- ALWAYS - asked for editor input and support? Go on- look at the history. You will see that editor input was always taken at first, despite the fact that all editors here are wholly unqualified to make a decision on this subject. When asked to explain themselves, no one had the nous to do so. Delicious Carbuncle, BlueBoy, Todd1, Fisher Queen, etc. All refused to answer for their actions. Cowards and buffoons who have no sense, courage, nor intelligence. Anyone who makes an attack on another person, as these 'editors' have, and runs away without facing the person they have attacked, is not deserving of their powers. I am now convinced that Wikipedia, despite it's noble origins, is just a place for fools to feel power in a world where they are unable to have any in reality. Go ahead and add your ridiculous little code to me and my site. You have no argument and have no intelligence- if you think you do, face me like a real human- talk, discuss, and the rest. Or be a true Wiki editor and make a stupid, sarcastic comment and run away... hiding... and never respond to your comments. Cheers, Kevin Nicholas Known as kmnicholas or ismboston and, yes, I live in England- of you bothered to ask and my mobile phone number is 07791 410 501 so stop making out that I'm hiding or tricking anyone. I'm, here. And I'll meet you, face to face, any time.

" Username. Hi, sorry for being intrusive, but (in my view) your username violates the username policy (specifically, here). Would you mind changing it (note: if you'd rather discuss it with more people, you could start a discussion here)? Cheers, · Engage. "

" A philosophical story to embrace ones mind. The ancient Indian mathematicians were the first to discover the digit zero ""0"" and implement it in the formation of digits. The whole world revolves like a cycle in the form of the digit zero. The Britishers dicovered an ancient egg of Dinosaures in India. What I mean to convey is that: India is the land where Lord Rama or Lord Krishna were born. Lord Rama was an example of a perfect ideal man on earth. His life story is an example for an ideal man to follow. Lord Rama, Lord Lakshmana, Lord Bharata and Lord Shatrughana were four sons of King Dhasratha of Ayodhya. He was cursed to die from the pain of separation from his son by the blind parents of Shrawan Kumar. Kaikeyi the mother of Bharata wishes to send Lord Rama on an exile for a period of 14 years and wishes her son Bharata to be the King of Ayodhya. Lord Rama and his wife Sita and his brother Lord Lakshmana leave for forests outside the kingdom of Ayodhya. Lord Rama's brother Lord Bharata persuades lord Rama to return back but lord Rama refuses to return to Ayodhya against the wishes of his step mother Kaikeyi. But Lord Bharata returns to Ayodhya along with the sandals of lord Rama and places the sandals of his brother Lord Rama on the throne and rules the kingdom of Ayodhaya in the name of Rama. This shows the example of love between an elder brother and his younger brother. In the forest once a demon shurpanaka sister of King Ravana disuades Lord Rama to marry her, but Lord Rama tells her that he is already married and points towards his brother Lord Lakshmana who cuts off her nose and ears to show her ugly nature and character. Shurphanaka runs off and complains about Lord Rama and Lord Lakshamana to King Ravana of Lanka. King Ravana somehow manages to kidnap Goddess Sita the wife of Lord Rama in revenge to Lanka. Lord Rama grieves for his separation from his beloved wife Goddess Sita. Here the feelings of an ideal person in the form of lord grieving from separation from his beloved

wife are beautifully described by Sage Valmiki who wrote the whole Ramayana. Sage Valmiki was a thief named Ratnakar who by the japam of Lord Sri Rama became a great sage named Valmiki and wrote a great epic called Ramanaya the story of King Rama and Sita. Lord Rama and Lord Lakshamana move towards southern India where they meet the lord Hanuman, (the great son of Anjani and Kesari; Lord Hanumanji is also known as Pavanputra or the great celibate bachelor) and Lord Sugriva and with the help of vanara sena or Army of Monkeys they move into the kingdom of Lanka and kill the demon king Ravana. Lord Rama rescues Goddesses Sita and with the help of Lord Hanuman they return back to Ayodhya. A fourteen years had lapsed when lord Rama had left the kingdom of Ayodhya. When lord Rama, Goddesses Sita, Lord Lakshmana and lord Hanuman return to Ayodhya, the people of Ayodhya cheer up and lit up the whole Ayodhya with Diyas in order to celebrate the victory and return of their king Lord Rama. The festival Dusherra is celebrated every year as a victory of good over evil as the demon Meghanad {the son of King Ravana},the demon Kumbhakarna {the brother of king Ravana} and the demon King Ravana of Lanka were killed by Lord Rama and Lord Lakshmana in order to rescue Goddesses Sita from her captivity in Lanka. And on the occassion of their return to Ayodhya the festival Diwali is celebrated throughout India every year with great pomp and show of lights and crackers. Whenever some troubled minds read this story of Ramayana their minds gain peace and the self confidence is restored as their spirits become calm, pacified and brave in the troubled periods of time. The Epic Ramayana denotes the greatness of Supreme God Lord Rama as an ideal human being on earth. "

" I interpret it as that as we have sources that are conflicting on basic information. While each of the sources appears reliable enough none of them can be reliably, and verifiability, traced back to either reports written by the people involved with the operation or someone that interviewed them. There does seem to be wide agreement that OBL was hit twice with the first shot being somewhere in the chest/trunk (depending on the report), and the second in the head. There are conflicting reports on the number of shooters and the number of shots fired. We have a couple of options for the article. 1) Only report those items that seem to have wide agreement and to be silent on those details where our sources offer conflicting data. 2) Document the conflicting details along with the sources. I'd personally go with #1 as it'll be a cleaner article. We'd have a constant battle with people trying to inject a POV such as ""OBL was shot twice by one person - look at all these sources."" I have a personal concern with the New Yorker version of the events in that it mentions the assault team blowing their way through doors and walls. For the first couple of days after the mission it appeared the public was allowed to wander around the compound and were only restricted from the innermost courtyard. Lots of people took photos. I never saw a photo of a hole blown into a wall nor did I see any apparent damage to the doors. Visible evidence of the assault would have been of great interest and no one took a photo? Thus, I'd say the New Yorker and other articles article is wrong on that detail. The assault team likely found the inner doors were unlocked and/or scaled the walls to get into the compound and to move between the walled off sections of the compound. There are other concerns about the New Yorker article in that it switches from great detail which appears to build credibility and the impression that this is an ""inside account"" to an absence of information on basic things such as what team #1 was doing immediately after they landed. I suspect the entire thing was spun together out of speculative opinions by others. Unfortunately, many of the articles about this incident have similar issues. |talk "

I've tried to be reasonable, you're offensive to me and give long-winded lectures on things that never happened? I accept that my first edit was a bit gung-ho. It was criticised, reverted and I was told not to do it again. I learned that isn't how things are done here and since then have worked my hardest to do things properly, but the article was so badly biased that it has to be revised. There are millions of people in the world that will read this article as their introduction to the beliefs of millions of others. Frankly, the matter is one of such importance that it goes beyond style issues, and again I think your style edits were very good ones. It is a core goal of Wikipedia to provide accurate information, it a secondary goal to provide it with style. My only mistake, assuming your edit is a good one, was to use the wrong syntax so as to make the headers too bold, giving undue weight. A minor mistake to correct, as you did for us in a few minutes. This is the nature of Wikipedia; easy to make mistakes, but easy to correct them. The sites I deleted from the external links, as you will see if you go to through the history a little and check them were all against guidelines: One didn't work, the site's html was screwed up, obviously delete it. Four of the top five links were to sites that promote Khalifa's unique claim that the the Quran has a mathematical structure based on the number 19 and that this proves two of the Quran's verses are man-made. These sites are obvious Khalifa followers, one has USI copyright assertions in the footnotes? Two or three more were just peoples own POV sites with free hosts and all that, nothing of any stature whatsoever. These were removed so that there is one link to the 19ers main site, and all the other links that were any good at all. The only other change I made was to add descriptions in parenthesis so people would know what each link actually led to.

SHUT THE FUCK UP! SHUT THE FUCK UP! SHUT THE FUCK UP! SHUT THE FUCK UP! SHUT THE FUCK UP! SHUT THE FUCK UP! SHUT THE FUCK UP! SHUT THE FUCK UP! SHUT THE FUCK UP! SHUT THE FUCK UP! SHUT THE FUCK UP! SHUT THE FUCK UP! SHUT THE FUCK UP! SHUT THE FUCK UP! SHUT THE FUCK UP! SHUT THE FUCK UP! SHUT THE FUCK UP! SHUT THE FUCK UP! SHUT THE FUCK UP! SHUT THE FUCK UP! SHUT THE FUCK UP! SHUT THE FUCK UP! SHUT THE FUCK UP! SHUT THE FUCK UP!vv SHUT THE FUCK UP! SHUT THE FUCK UP! SHUT THE FUCK UP! SHUT THE FUCK UP! SHUT THE FUCK UP! SHUT THE FUCK UP! SHUT THE FUCK UP! SHUT THE FUCK UP! SHUT THE FUCK UP! SHUT THE FUCK UP! SHUT THE FUCK UP! SHUT THE FUCK UP! SHUT THE FUCK UP! SHUT THE FUCK UP! SHUT THE FUCK UP! SHUT THE FUCK UP! SHUT THE FUCK UP! SHUT THE FUCK UP! SHUT THE FUCK UP! SHUT THE FUCK UP! SHUT THE FUCK UP! SHUT THE FUCK UP! SHUT THE FUCK UP! SHUT THE FUCK UP! SHUT THE FUCK UP! SHUT THE FUCK UP! SHUT THE FUCK UP! SHUT THE FUCK UP!

What kind of help do you need? Please specify so that we can help you in the best way possible. Willy (Talk - Contribs)

Suck my c*ck You're a nazi.

(Can we get permission to use Mobileburn's Picture: Mini vs Micro USB)

Do not remove my accurate commentary dont do it

hey motherfucker hurry up!

October 2009 Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalized, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed.

Routes A (Rockville Route) Metro Center - Shady Grove (red) B (Glenmont Route) Metro Center - Glenmont (red) C (Huntington Route) Metro Center - Huntington (blue/orange-blue-blue/yellow-yellow) D (New Carrollton Route) Metro Center - New Carrollton (blue/orange-orange) E (Branch Avenue Route) Gallery Place - Branch Avenue (green/yellow-green) F (Greenbelt Route) Gallery Place - Greenbelt (green/yellow-green) G (Addison Road Route) D junction - Largo Town Center (blue) J (Franconia-Springfield Route) C junction - Franconia-Springfield (blue) K (Vienna Route) C junction - Vienna (orange) L (? Route) F junction - C junction (yellow) Any idea what H and I were to be? Dulles and Columbia Pike branches? (talk - )

For a second time, you're failing to address the points made to you. Please pay attention to what I am saying rather than being a cunt.

Infobox Should we keep the old infobox as less parties have seats here (ie Respect, UKIP, SDLP, SNP, Sinn Fein, DUP, Green etc) and keep the new infobox for the main UK election article?

Wher's me on your main page? Um, I checked your user page and my name is not listed on your adopties. There's a problem?

" ""May get blocked"" why? I'm at this point more than confused and disturbed that I am repeatedly threatened with being blocked for the crime of reporting the incessant racist rants and anti-Semitic personal attacks of another editor. I am equally confused and disturbed at accusations of ""soapboxing"" ""forum shopping"" and the are leveled at me, especially since my valid (and subsequently confirmed) complaint about anti-Semitic ranting was met with a response of ""Shut the hell up"" by a sorta maybe admin who shut the case. and I am as well confused and disturbed by the insinuations that I am somehow stampeding on this rabid anti-Semite's ""free speech"" by filing this complaint. The first, bold faced instruction on WP:TALK is that talk pages should not be used by editors as platforms for their personal views. Does this somehow not apply if those personal views are anti-Semitic, Jew bashing racist personal attacks? Is that an exception to WP:TALK? I am simply not getting it here, and I am tired of the threats I am receiving, as well as the open season style nasty attacks by other editors and admins who don't even bother to read the case I've compiled. Please explain. "

Dragon Dice D&D;? There's a hi-res scan of the Dragon Dice box cover here. There doesn't appear to be any reference to D&D; on the cover, and the game itself appears to have no connection to the D&D; license. Does it belong on this page?

" re: Deora Hi Pak21, thanks for adding {{context]} to Deora. I had added it earlier today but the creator removed it; I then reverted it... (well, you can check the edit history;-) ). Thanks, (talk) "

Dodoma Region DYK Hey Cwmhiraeth! Thanks for the review. I've added an inline citation as requested. Could you take another look at it please? Cheers! —

World Caloric Output I read the fact that the world produces enough calories to give everyone 2800 per day if there was a better system of distribution. (Or incentive to distribute it.) I was asked to provide a source and came up with this one with Google which provides sources and additional information. Calculating the world caloric output is probably impossible, but this information seems relevant to this article. I'm not sure where it should go, though.

" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Richard Simmons. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing.  Blanchardb -•MyEars•MyMouth- timed "

Vandalism can someone protect the page because there has been alot of edits and its really getting annoying when people do it to bother others.

" You're a dumb American, right? No degree? Knows nothing of engineering? Thinks mathematics is ""universal""? Played monopoly in high school instead of learning? How am I doing so far?"

Please see Talk:Maria: or, The Wrongs of Woman/Archive 1#Page name for previous discussion. Awadewit suggests just The Wrongs of Woman.

" I've got information from fellow wikipedians that the statement is an old american folk saying (Teaching grandmother to suck eggs), which I've had never heard about; I'm sorry if I offended you in any regards. →Toth "

Personal Attack Check the history of that IP and you will see that it is not at all a personal attack. Please also remember that you can't blank talk pages that don't belong to you. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Don%27t_restore_removed_comments

" forgot you were ""there"", bad time for attempt at a joke "

Can this be moved to having ſ as the title? I was under the impreſſion that lowercaſe letters were not a problem at the beginning of titles any more.

I never said i did you ugly bastard. Get of my case, you bitch whore. Piece of shit. I said i have the right to post the No Israel and Christian Fiction userboxes NOT the personal info you bitchfuck. You fuckin fuckface. This is why I hate the Wikipedia system. It makes it difficult for people to function. You stupid shitface.

not to be trusted as reliable

" Thanks, but I have no regrets. Talk "

Test is this going on the talk page? beckjord

If you delete that again then you only prove my point.

Brilliant, just blindly revert, you know you are removing useful edits i made.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Electrostatic flocking, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text borrowed from web sites. For more information, take a look at our policy library. Happy editing! (talk) 09:10, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I go away for a little while and Javert loses his mind. *tisk tisk*

I am not from vietnam, nor do i appreciate being called a bitter bee. Please stop the personal attacks.

User_talk:Blackson#Religious_bias

" URGENT Appeal - Beckjord dog fell off cliff "" Dear Friends and enemies- even in the midst of conflicts, we become related, even in opposition. Today, we took our Bigfoot watch-dog, Toby, a yellow lab, to Dillon Beach,CA, for a run and he slipped off a cliff. Fell 25 feet and broke both front legs. Now is in vet's office and facing surgery. Being broke, it will be tough to face $3000 -$4000 in vet fees. Toby is resting under sedation and we take him to the surgeon tomorrow. Anyone wishing to assist us can donate for tax deduction 501(3)(c) by contacting us at rudy@stealthaccess.net or sending check to use for Fractured Atlas (sponsor) at E,Beckjord Box 950-2,Berkeley,CA 94709 and they will send back tax deducion form. Purpose is vets bills for Video Bigfoot sniffer dog benefit, for the Ultimate Bigfoot Video Film Project. E.B."" see dog at http://www.beckjord.com/electricrepairs/yelldg.jpg from the Edit Committee."

There is another folklore saying that you don't know all of your fathers.

" O Sorry Sorry. Actually I saw a Wikibreak and though you won't be available to comment. I will be listing concerns on Talk:Goan Catholics. Thanks, TC "

" thankyou Thankyou for Wikifing the Irish Orienteering associations Gaelic page . sorry don't speak Gaelic . thanks again.. PS are you an Orienter TALKies"

PfD's... Some of the pages I created were posted as PfD's for days now, And they were voted to keep, do you know when should the templates be removed?

" We have a color for ""Altaic"" just as we have a color for other non-genetic groups such as ""Papuan"" and ""American"" in order to keep the number of colors at a manageable level. But most linguists have never been convinced of the validity of ""Altaic"" as a genetic group and the majority of linguistics simply view it as a Sprachbund. I doubt that further research will reveal anything more convincing. The notion of ""Altaic"" has been around for 60-something (or more) years and has failed to convince the majority of historical linguists in that time. It's not like we're dealing with unknown languages and simply lack enough data. ""Altaic"" is likely never to be demonstrated to be a valid genetic grouping. "

Seminole High School (Seminole County, Florida) Thank you for your contributions. This article has numerous problems. If you can, please visit the talk pag at Talk:Seminole High School (Seminole County, Florida) and address these issues. Thanks.

They looks like a THE BEATLES,and the beatles NOT emo! emo not is a genre of music,emo not is culture,is a simple bad idea of Teens Ignorants AMERICANS! the shaggy ,mod , punk hair cut NOT emo emo have style,not have music,not have culture

{unblock|I understand if my test was taken to be vandalism, but I am new to Wikipedia, and just wanted to know if my test was gonna work. What ever happened to assuming good faith?}}

The Eleventh Hour Wikipedia must be kept accurate at all times, I posted a reliable source regarding The Eleventh Hout airing on ITV1 therefore my decision to edit that to the article displaying that info still stands.

" For an arbitrator your very mature. "

That would be okay by me. 18:57, 23 Feb 2004 (UTC)

" Five Wheat Whiskey Alternatives to Pappy thought you might be interested. () "

Are you sure I reverted? I was just removing NON-English sources from Greater Khorasan.

" Hi , I see that the article in question is one that you have created yourself, good job! However, it contains a number of issues apart from the one that you have just stated(encyclopaedic tone). The page has no real references apart from the club website, so statement like ""This step taken by him was heavily condemned by the Bagan fans"" seems to be your personal opinion. Here is a grammatical mistake: ""..Bagan confirmed the signing of an well experienced.."". These are just a couple of examples. Please correct these issues. If you feel that I have made a mistake, please report it to other editors/admins and I'm sure they will resolve the issue for you. Cheers! "

Poyning or Poynings? It is absolutely and without a doubt Sir Edward Poynings. See the Oxford Dictionary of National Biography entry by Steven G. Ellis, ‘Poynings, Sir Edward (1459–1521)’, Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, Oxford University Press, 2004 accessed 2 March 2008. As such, the law 10 Henry VII c. 9 should be, and generally is, described as Poynings' law. For examples see, R. D. Edwards and T. W. Moody, 'The history of Poynings' law, part I, 1494-1615', Irish Historical Studies, II (1940-41): 415-16 or C. I. McGrath The Making of the Eighteenth-Century Irish Constitution. Government, Parliament and the Revenue, 1692-1714 (Dublin, 2000). That said, it is listed as Poynings's law in the index of David Dickson, New Foundations: Ireland 1660-1800 (Dublin, 1987), 246.

Edit request on 3 March 2014

His/her insanity should be investigated.

to do Altoona curve- fix horseshoe curve link to go directly to it.

Oh so it's you who wants the considerable amount of harm then is it? You fucking cretin. You seriously think I'm going to stop vandalising just because you block me? I have a MASSIVE range of IPs and you will never block them all. I am never going to stop either. Hahaha 94.2.133.200

" A belated welcome! ]]Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, HipHopDoc. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia: Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia Contributing to Wikipedia How to edit a page Help pages How to write a great article Editor's index to Wikipedia Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! —  oh hello! "

" Arbitration case I have mentioned you, specifically in conjunction with your edit history, on the Evidence Talk page (here). At the moment I do not, myself, intend to pursue this any farther to my knowledge, I have not had any substantial interactions with you. I simply had questions about how it might be handled, or if there was existing precedent. [ ~/talk ] # _ "

Whore Feel free to correct me, but I changed the occupation to reflect the facts. If you think about it, she is a whore and has really used that fact to her advantage in her endeavours. Please tell me if I this should be prostitute (whore sounded a little harsh).

2 new matches announced 1 new match has been announced on a pre-taped RAW for next week: Submissions Count Anywhere Match for The US Title: -Daniel Bryan (c) vs. The Miz SmackDown! for 24/9/2010 announced this: -Kane (c) vs. The Undertaker in a Hell In A Cell Match for the WHC.

" Genome says ""In early 1923 the Newspaper Publishers' Association refused to print BBC programme details without the payment of advertising fees, and in response, the BBC decided to publish its own magazine - The Radio Times ('The Official Organ of the BBC') - to alert listeners to what was on and when."" - http://genome.ch.bbc.co.uk/about (talk) "

. Also I don't think a reputable gaming blogger would recommend software that is malicious, and one would assume that there would be some relevant posts on MULE forums out there indicating such, but there are none. In fact, the Atari MULE Online site is recommended by almost every MULE fan site

I went to the first link on Bellamy. And its about him being persecuted by lunatics. So you wouldn't wonder that he would be intimidated into a retraction. So its full spectrum lunacy here. Trying to control the Wiki. Intimidating scientists who disagree with you. A major cult movement. Which is not to say that his comments on glaciers weren't way out of date and wrong. If indeed he did make them. What happens is that these leftists will follow people around taking notes of every last thing they say. And then if they make one mistake then that's a hanging offence. Shame on the scientists for giving this fellow such a hard time. This is what science has come to. A Priesthood with its own star chamber. And parasites like William here declaring Bellamy a non-scientist. The impudence

DUMB ASS THIS IS MY PAGE! LEAVE IT THE FUCK ALONE!

" First of all, reverting your edit wasn't a challenge to whether or not the information was correct. It was purely based on the lack of a citation. Wikilinks are not acceptable substitutions for inline citations. Each article must be able to stand on its own set of references and not rely on a wikilink to another article's reference. Refer to WP:CITE for more information. Secondly, comparing the flags and drawing a conclusion – no matter how reasonable and obvious it might be – can be considered a form of original research which is not permitted on Wikipedia. Citing a reliable source that supports the analogy alleviates the concern. It also helps us establish the significance of the information as it relates to the topic. Without that verification, it may be a trivial observation that doesn't necessarily belong in this article (see WP:DUE). As for your ""sky is blue"" analogy, it's an apples-to-oranges comparison. Take for example the statement that ""the Eiffel Tower is in Paris"". This is widely accepted fact that doesn't require research, and therefore doesn't require a citation. However, the statement that ""Gustave Eiffel designed the Eiffel Tower"" would need a citation, although it is easily verifiable. It may be hard to see the difference, but the rule of thumb is when you think it may be challenged, it's best to err on the side of caution and include a citation. "

On September 1, Hitler attacked Poland. Britain and France were caught in their own trap. These two countries assisted in all of Hitler's adventures, hoping to use him against the Soviet Union. http://www.plp.org/books/Stalin/node131.html

Nice one, that inspires confidence. From what I can see, the hurdle to getting concise info in the articles is the thought of good material being lost. By attacking NN/guide/cruft material, compressing articles and cutting the unnecessary articles ourselves, we're ensuring that the relevant info remains and that AFD can't be used as a sledgehammer to smash the series apart. The struggles of the editors who have already put so much work in is resulting in more regular contributors popping up and the whole thing is coming together. Huzzah!

Am i going mad i was on steven segal page this morning and i'm sure it said on the 25 Aug 09 steven segal had a heart attack on the film set did i read this or am i going mad 26 Aug 09

" And regarding the ""consensus"" canard there are three people here two of which are likely the same person. Only one of us even knew what a Ph.D is being myself. "

" afd could anyone explain why on earth you would want to afd Jesus Christ as myth, as a pov fork of this article? That's completely irrational. Preferredly, explain your reasons on that article's talkpage. Oh, and please look up ""myth"" in some good dictionary first. The article here for months laboured under the misapprehension that ""myth"" has anything to do with historicity. It appears that this article is about a theory that argues against the historicity of Jesus. It may or may not be a pov-fork of Historicity of Jesus, but how on earth can you allege a sober discussion of the mythology in the gospel is in any way a pov fork of this? I am especially confused since the people protesting do not appear to be victims of fundamentalist piety but self-describe as skeptics. I am used to having problems getting plain reason across to religionists, but I am a little bit at a loss on how to recommend plain reason to rationalists... () "

" My friend posted this about me, and I would like it taken off. ""Thomas Richmond (born 1990), heir of wealthy family"" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richmond_%28surname%29"

" About biased articles I'm not sure if it's approariate to point out an AfD discussion to you, when you haven't previously been involved (is it?), but here seems to be another pretty bad case of WP:SYNTH: Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Communist_genocide. Taking a look at the sources used in the article, I have found absolutely nothing to confirm that ""communist genocide"" is a real term or concept, not to mention a notable concept enough for its own article. We could rename it to ""Genocide commited by communist governments"", but even then it seems too much like an advocating POV article and original synthesis. All the material is surely already present in the different genocide articles, so there doesn't seem to be any need for this kind of article. It seems pretty shocking if this kind of article is allowed to stay. "

" Cool, apology is not needed - just as long as you accept my explanation I am happy - sometimes easy to take keyboard comments the wrong way - regards - reallycan "

CMSAZ - I re-edited KPHO , both are employees of Helicopters Inc a private company providing air video service to KTVK,KPHO,KPNX. They are not branded or considered employees or on-air personalities of KPHO or the Meredith Corporation. I appreciate what you do for the industry by updated the Wiki's but as someone who works in this industry and this market please do not continue to provide mis information.

) Sorry about the inconvient vandalism. I thought that you might enjoy a Lil' Jon parody though. Sorry again! 05:17, 5 June 2007 (UTC

Comment So now we are stuck with a week of 200+ broken links. Since you acknowledge that the move was a mistake and not uncontroversial, will you please revert it? If anyone wants to dispute that the opera is the primary topic, they can do so under a proper requested move discussion, as they should have done in the first place. If you are not willing or able to do this today, I'll ask a another administrator to do it.

" It certainly ought to. Have we finished with this nonsense now, or are you determined to carry on to round two? Corbett "

I do not have to explain to you anything but I still will. The things you archived should not be archived yet. It should only be archived if there are more than 30 large sections.

Deleting off-topic text Hi dab, there is this thing in Wikipedia about not deleting other peoples' comments in most cases, but I think I/we should be allowed to delete a lot of the off-topic stuff in Talk:Ancient Macedonian language. Should I go ahead and do it (including my off-topic stuff)? Or would you like to? 1 July 2005 08:59 (UTC)

FUCK YOU DPAK DSUZA you are a pathetic piece of shit.

'm reverting his edits so fast. He doesn't intend to stop, he's still doing it now. Oh, he's been blocked anyways. No worries. He's made a new account, Wolfgang The Second. No problem. I'll keep you updated. He'll (probably) be gone by 10:15 GMT, since that's when this period ends. Yes, we're in school. Wolfgang The Third is on its way, it seems. Not very original, is he? He's going for a new name, and he's turned his screen away from me....He's also reading everything I do. An idea occurs...Hehe, I just turned off his computer. )

Editor 125a@hotmail.com - record of abuse Evidence of Rms125sa@hotmail.com track record of abusing editor role available at http://www.questpedia.org/en/Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Rms125a@hotmail.com, http://en.wikipedia.atpedia.com/en/articles/r/e/q/Wikipedia~Requests_for_checkuser_Case_Rms125a@hotmail.com_b1fd.html.

This is a fact for which reliable, published sources do exist!

" Understanding ""Wikified"" language Hi, and thanks for taking the time to ""Wikify"" the language I added to ""Ballast Point"". If you don't mind, I would like to ask a question so I can better understand this; I am new to this, still learning. The background is that in the 1800s, the European settlement of the Sydney area was in its early days. Place names were informal, and often duplicated. There were at least two, probably three places on Sydney Harbour known as ""Ballast Point"" then. This is what I attempted to clarify with my comment that it was another site also known by that name. The revised wording gives me the impression that there was only one place of that name in the 1800s, and it changed. So can you please indicate why the new wording is preferred, so I can adopt the best approach in future? "

I've restored your removal of the section, which frankly borders on vandalism considering the talk page discussion. As has been explained above, this is a noteworthy scandal which has been well-reported in the mainstream media and is a significant embarrassment to the studio. As long as the section does not actually mention the leaked plot details (which are not actually relevant to the news story), it should remain.

" Featured lists on the main page (perhaps!) Hi there. There's a discussion here about the possibility of getting featured lists their own section on the main page. The discussion has turned to presenting a few lists that would represent the quality and diversity of topics that we cover, and a list that you were involved with has been mentioned specifically. It'd be great to get your thoughts. Regards, "

It seems to me you do not have answer. For vandalizing Talk Page as document of conversations. Please revert you actions 74.213.188.138

This article doesn't use proper footnoting, also the references are webpages, I don't usually use webpages by works which are not accessible on the web. I'll see what I can do. I will be also modifying the leads of the history section, the etymology of the term must be expended and also what most believe of its ethymology. Also must be expended that deportation of Jews and Armenians under prior Persian rules (The Jewish encyclopedia document it), as well as the destruction of Julfa and the deportation of the Armenians in the 12th century. The entire information about the Armenians is totally missing in this article, most importantly prior to the 12th century. (ix)

There is ref to an interview at https://diva.sfsu.edu/collections/sfbatv/bundles/206378

The above is actually very informative. Wow; it is really good to read over what is said in these statments they make you understand the occupational story of Iraq by the US and UK.

I don't believe this behavior is typical of Kenderick, and I feel that a bit of understanding is due here.

"Here is an interesting link for Albanian PIE see dem Albanian form: 0000"">dem [m] (tg) {1} Meaning: bull-calf; bullock Proto-Albanian: dam- Quasi-IE: d(o)mh2-(i)o- See also: dash Page in Demiraj AE: 128 IE reconstruction: 0000"">demh2- Meaning of the IE root: to tame Certainty: + Page in Pokorny: 199 Other IE cognates: OIr. dam `ox, bullock' Notes: {1} With umlaut of the root vowel from the plural stem *dam–¢. "

This response is years late, and I should be embarrassed for even responding to such an insipid query. But so that you know, Mockinbird Heights was most likely situated as a small bedroom Suburb of New York State, situated below New York City, and embedded in probably Westchester. Putnam, or Organge county. There are a couple of allusions as to the geographical placment; for example, in one episode, the Munster were required to remove temporarily to the city Buffalo, New York. The characters made many disparaging remarks about the declining state of the now-rust-belt, and depressed area, which has been dying since the late fifties. This would also make sense as most of the Hollywood writers, creators and producers came from New York City of that era,ever since the begining of the movie industry, and has prolifically and affectionately represented their area origin that gave them so much oppertunities. 24.46.103.28 Veryverser

Thanks for the SPb/Decembrist revolt fi:FA status alert Thank you for posting the alert about the Saint Petersburg/Decembrist Revolt featured articles status on fi:WP. Pity I don't know Finnish to import the shiny pieces over here. -)

I interperated this edit summary that you were done with the french communes.