text
stringlengths 0
3.14k
| labels
sequence | encoded_labels
sequence |
|---|---|---|
Brown is PM over Scotland & Elizabeth II is Queen over Scotland. However they are Prime Minister & Queen of the United Kingdom of Great Britain & Northern Ireland. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Oatley Senior High School. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Also, could you recolour ? | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
TODAY SHOW HAS BEEN NUMBERf 1 FOR 15 YEARS. MATT HAS BEEN ON THE SHO SINCE 1994 AND NATALIE HAS BEEN ON SINCE 2003.
Please unblock me.
{unblock|reason=Your reason here }} please unblock me. I know I am right. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Guy, 4 words; You don't scare me! Infonerd2216 | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
You gleefully claim to be 'evil' (whatever that means) and then accuse me of painting you as evil? Mmmkay. I need add nothing else to demonstrate the depth of intellect and rational thought that you have to work with. You confirm my assumption of Christians (note: the apostrophe you used is erroneous) - confused, irrational, angry and easily moved to hysteria. Your user page should be referenced as an example for 'Loser'. | [
"toxic",
"insult"
] | [
1,
0,
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
@ That's not at all what I said. I consider this still the ""just met"" portion of our relationship, and that phrase was an expression toward my desire that we both treat each other incredibly well. @ " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
This is becoming very tiresome. After the last reasonable attempt at compromise to keep one person (Rothbard) happy as well as everyone else by making the language neutral, Rothbard returned to remove an important qualifying word (""some"") and to change ""parliament"" to ""government"" and to delete documenting links. That shows lack of good faith and also lack of understanding of parliamentary government. Regarding the first point, to criticize a mullah or a priest is not to criticize Islam or Christianity, and to criticize one activist in a movement is not to criticize ""the antiwar movement."" That is simple dishonesty to claim otherwise. Regarding the second point, in a parliamentary system, the word ""government"" refers to prime minister and cabinet, not to members of parliament. To advise ""government"" you are advising the prime minister. Nothing states that Palmer ever met the prime minister, but he spoke to members of the parliament. Rothbard is perhaps no political scientist, but there is a major difference between them. Even under the American system, if someone speaks to members of the Congress, it would be dishonest to write that she or he had come to Washington to ""advise the government."" We had reached a compromise and Rothbard indicated that he could live with it, but he has now gone in without any reason and changed the entry to be misleading. The agenda at work seems more to defame a person than to provide neutrally articulated information. The issue is raised and it's time for Rothbard to simply back off. Others here will have to revert his attempt to introduce errors into this entry. " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Strange joke?
An anonymous editor made this edit a while ago and claims that is was not a joke. Considering the user's talk page, I thought it would be better to direct the user here rather than to discuss the question on our own. - | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
, after immense effort | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
According to your logic, reverting vandalism would be disruptive too, and should lead to blocking. I think the problem here is that, like many admins, you barely contribute to Wikipedia, and care little about its content. You are mainly a janitor and policeman, and tend to develop a janitor's and a policeman's attitude. It is an issue of systemic bias. Ordinary users tend to have an editor's attitude, i.e. their priority is making articles as good as possible, and not accept other people's bad edits.
Your mention of discussion on talk pages is fantasy. Oh, I do of course discuss matters on talk pages at great length (look at this for example), but I am under no illusions that people like you or Eiorgiomugini will be swayed by any amount of logical argument. At the end of the day, the only way that editors can make sure that articles have good content and not bad content is by inserting good content and removing bad content. This is my observation after long examination of Wikipedia.
In the specific case of me versus Eiorgio, your mention of discussion is also a straw man because you are trying to imply that I only discussed in the edit summaries. In reality, I tried to reason with him on his talk page, but he simply deleted all my comments, showing he had no interest in debating it.
Your mention of sockpuppetry is fantasy and a straw man. Please do not introduce irrelevant, insulting concepts into the discussion. With as much validity, I could warn you to make sure that Tawker is not your (good-cop/bad-cop) sockpuppet.
Since you enjoy linking to policy with which I am in most cases more familiar than you, have a look at WP:SOCK, WP:3RR, WP:DICK and a few more. — " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Enough, these bands need to go Vol. 1
Since someone can't just listen and understand the music, I guess it has to be done the hard way. There are plenty more that can go, but I'll start with one set.
Funeral For a Friend - the band themselves even know they aren't emo (says so in the reference), and anyone that listens to them knows they don't play emo. They don't have emo influences (Deftones, Iron Maiden, Get Up Kids) and they never played/toured with bands in the emo scene. They're nothing more than one of those melodic/post hardcore bands with the 00's decade sound.
Hawthorne Heights - see above. Same thing, no matter if it's as HH or when they were called A Day In the Life.
Ida - first of all, that reference does not even mention Ida as being an emo band. It says folk. And if you actually listen to Ida, it is nothing more than indie/folk music. Just because the guy was in The Hated doesn't mean it's emo. They never belonged here, and nowhere on their wiki page does it mention emo.
Joan of Arc - similar thing to Ida. Yes they had members of Cap'n Jazz, but they took a different direction from their old band and were playing indie rock.
The Juliana Theory - stunned that they would even be mentioned (or maybe not, given some others). Not only could you not find an influence of emo in their sound, but they're really a lot closer to the alternative scene you'd hear on any radio station than even being mentioned in the indie or pop-punk groups. Solid band, but nothing to do with emo.
Lostprophets - already mentioned somewhere around here. One little blurb by some guy that doesn't know what he's talking about doesn't count. This band never had anything to do with emo. Not saying they're a horrible band (because that's not the point). They just don't belong on a list of emo bands.
And 30 Seconds To Mars, as listed above, need to get out of here as well. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Restored
I restored the n-word part after | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
I'll make a deal with you. If you can tell me ONE page where this image can go, I'll stop adding that image to random articles. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Have a good break and let me know when you return if I can help you with anything. 05:18, 10 Sep 2004 (UTC) | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
While I'm happy to answer questions, it looks like your question could have been answered and resolved more quickly if you had used my message wizard. It's linked as ""Talk"" after my name and at the top of my talk page. Why not try it next time?
You have added the name of the copyright holder, but you still have not explained why there should be multiple non-free images in the article, nor what purpose the image serves that increases readers' understanding of the article. " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Create an account
I really liked your edits to the Apprentice 4 page. I'd really encourage you to make an account. If you do, please leave a note on my user talk page with your new name. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
I agree with brother , there is too much notable coverage of ""based"" being, at the very least, an established genre for it not to be included in this article. _friend " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
I was trying to show what I have figured out was that the drug companies were attempting to take over the medical articles on Wikipedia. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
RE: ""Critical Reception"" Edits
I liked the intro that you added to the critical reception section, but the inclusion of a reviewers name seemed a bit odd - name's of reviewers aren't usually included in the review section. Also, reviews should be organized (roughly) by the clout of the reviewing publication, i.e. well-known publications come first and continue in decreasing order of popularity. I also think it's important for the opinion of the reviewer to be easily readable, i.e. if a reviewer deems the record ""her best work since [insert album title], it should be included in the summary, not lumped together and simply referenced. If you have any questions/disputes with my reversion, let me know." | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
It TDTH u can 735886246513572^ | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"{| class=""messagebox standard""
| style=""width: 50px"" |
| Notice to administrators
This IP address is registered to Deutsche Post Telekom AG and used by a very large number of people in Germany, including many, many established users. Use extreme caution when blocking this IP.
If a user is requesting that you release an autoblock of this IP address, remove the autoblock as soon as possible, as it will affect scores of legitimate users.
|}
" | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
" So you haven't done your homework, you refuse to read or listen to the answers to your questions and then you delete the references that have them. You are quite a piece of work. What happened to freedom of speech and free open honest discussion where people can be swayed by reasoned thought? I am curious what all the other wiki editors who have been following this think. Of course it will be difficult for them to research the sources you have removed and now locked out. How about that. Suggestion: if you were really as honest as you like to think you are, you would put both articles on the page for everyone to read and vote on. Yours as it now is, and mine as I last left it. It says in the instruction to new editors to assume good faith. That has not been my experience of you, and from my point of view, you have now demonstrated that beyond any doubt. There are other issues here. Everywhere I look in wikipedia I see poorly written, out of date articles, or articles with messages requesting that someone update them. I am curious how many others have had similar experiences to what I have had here and who have lost interest and moved on? Does anyone keep track of wikipedia's hit count and how it has changed over the years? Or the number of active wiki editors? I wouldn't be surprised one little bit to find out it both have leveled out and gone into decline. If so, has it occurred to you that that might be a signal of some sort? This issue also points out another major flaw in wikipedia; the fact that a single admitted non-expert in a field of study can override multiple experts from NASA, Lockheed Martin, JPL, etc., on a topic as you have done here. You have some serious issues here. I will be interested in seeing how you resolve them, assuming that you can. Or will this article remain as it now is, another stone in the constipated belly of wikipedia, for years to come? I just had an idea. I am going to put the article as I last left it right here so that the other wiki editors who have been following this can read and compare without editorials from either of us. It will be interesting to see if you have the courage to leave it alone and allow others to form their own opinion and do their own research. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
_______________________________________________________________________________________________ A skyhook is a proposed space transportation concept that aims to reduce the cost of placing payloads into space. Skyhooks are often confused with an Earth surface to geostationary orbit space elevator, but they are different. A skyhook is much shorter than a space elevator and does not reach down to the surface of the Earth. A skyhook requires a suborbital launch vehicle to get to the bottom end of the skyhook, a space elevator does not. Due to the much shorter length of the skyhook and the resulting reduction in strain, skyhooks up to 4,000 km in length can be built with existing materials, while an Earth surface to geostationary orbit space elevator cannot.Amanda S. Wu, Tsu-Wei Chou, ""Carbon Nanotube Fibers for Advanced Composites"", Materials Today, vol. 15, July–August 2012, pp. 302-310 The advantage of a skyhook it that the lower end of the cable is moving at less than orbital velocity for its altitude. As a result, a launch vehicle flying to the bottom of the skyhook can carry a larger payload than it could going directly to orbit on its own. When the cable is long enough, single stage to skyhook flight with a reusable launch vehicle such as a spaceplane becomes possible. Reusability of the launch vehicle and an enlarged payload fraction makes for much lower launch costs. Once the cable has become long enough the skyhook becomes cost competitive with what is realistically thought to be achievable using a space elevator (assuming a space elevator can ever be built), and the skyhook can be built.{{cite jour | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
Template:QA TfD
TfD nomination of Template:
Template: has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. I thought this might get noticeable usage despite objections that it wasn't logically useful, and waited a long time, but 'snot hap'nin'. -/ Nothing personal! — [talk] [cont] ‹(-¿-)› " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
I realized it was hard for you to refer to me what with the numbers as my username because I didn't have an account, so I got one and now you can refer to me as Tonetare. My name is Tony and my brother's name is Terry so I just put the two together. Anyway, I am very excited you accepted my offer to make this page. I had just looked at what you wrote on the WWE discussion page and was thinking of making it, but then I was like why not have him help me. He obviously must know a lot about it and it was his idea and two heads are better than one. I don't know when you would like to start if you want to shoot me a reply at anytime.
Randy Orton
Can you please stop with the needless edits on the page. Do not remove pictures and replace them with bad quailty and pointless pictures. Please learn to use the show preview button so countless bad edits are not saved. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
This is very stupid considering Voltaire held both positive and negative image of Muhammad. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
if you have something to say to me say it now | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Look, you pathetic, authority-obsessed whiner: you cannot find a better set of historical and contemporary images on the subject matter for free on the web, can you? Huh? | [
"toxic",
"insult"
] | [
1,
0,
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
I've made a request of appropriately informed individuals. Josh Parris#: " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
If the effect of demonstrating the operation of majority pov against the wishes of Irish editors is to cause the pov-pushers to become more entrenched, so be it. For 7 years the approach you are advocating (whatever it is) has failed to change a thing. I have outlined the compromises I have made and am prepared to make. But I'll not be bullied into denying reality. By you or anyone else. Next time you launch a personal attack on me, expect a reply in kind. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Thanx
Thank you for your concern. Yes unfortunately wikipedia is a battleground for some people. Look here and see what i mean about Khoikhoi. ( ) | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
Thanks a lot!
Hey.. Thanks a lot for the wishes!! How ya doin?? Hope you notice the subtle change in my signature.. he he... -).. thanks a lot again! 18 Years, India • contribs " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
Kurdish Areas 2002 CIA
CIA]]
CIA]]
re: It is a map with a more recent date (2002 vs. 1992) and I thought it a good addition.
Good point, but could try to find one that is less ugly? (no offense) Also, I don't see a huge difference between the two maps. —
True, the basic data seems just about the same and, yes, the map uses a less appealing style. I actually think that the more to-the-point style is better at showing the Kurdish region. Maybe the infobox in Kurdistan is not the best place for this particular image, but I believe the fact that the CIA continues to show basically the same region as ""Kurdish"" bolsters the claim that this is the region that is Kurdistan. Note also the inset caption characterising it as the traditional Kurdish-inhabited area.
True, but as I said before, it's kinda ugly. Could you find a nicer-looking one? —
It does kind of look like drippings from a green candle. However, it is a valid and more recent reference. I'm going to drop this whole conversation on to Talk:Kurdistan and see where it goes. " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Still waiting for that apology, man. 76.119.5.204 | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
I Apologize
I've been having a bad few days, some really bad stuff has been happening to me lately. So I'm sorry for personally attacking me. But will you please stop featuring me as a ""troll"" as you call it. I know what I did was wrong but I don't deserve to be belittled like that. I know that you told El C to block me, but I'm okay with it because like I said, I was being a loser. But also I've been having a few bad days, just so you know.
" | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
PG, unfortunately, calling attention to suspected socks in good faith doesn't seem to be a personal attack. (See generally WP:SOCK) (But don't run around accusing everyone of being socks themselves, or you'll get yourself spanked for violating WP:POINT!!!). I am not crazy about it, but I don't think it's nearly as offensive as calling someone a rapist, for example. Even more confusingly, there isn't actually any rule against using socks, as long as you don't vote twice on the same issue or do one of a few other forbidden things. My advice would be to blow the whole issue off your comment counts as much as anyone else's, whether or not someone called you a sock. Just explain that you're not a sock and go back to making your edits what do you care what some other random editor sitting in his basement (like me) thinks? | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Many thanks. As far as I can tell Vakoch's announcements are the exception that proves that rule, and neither astronomers nor telescope institutions typically broadcast what they're looking at, so those are the to-go sources. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
Well, I consider it an attack when someone tries pulling double standards on me - and that is EXACTLY what's being done when the link to the files area is deleted while the link to ""walmart facts"" is allowed to remain.
I have taken the liberty of deleting it, and compiling a list of those who've pushed the walmart POV. Whether your username is added to that list depends on whether you restore the ""walmart facts"" link.
" | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Go fuk your Momma, Rancie! | [
"toxic",
"profane",
"insult"
] | [
1,
1,
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
You obviously have a penile problem. Think too much about mummay and daddy doing it, do you? | [
"toxic",
"insult"
] | [
1,
0,
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
ISIL onlyinclude tags
Hi there, I noticed you reverted the edit I made taking out the onlyinclude tags from the ISIL timeline page. Since it's not transcluded anymore and you fixed the main ISIL article, I'm wondering if there's still a need for these tags in the timeline page and if so why. Thanks. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Dear Sir.
Please be my friend. I'm so lonely and sad. '( Also, if my actions have made me a vandal, then I don't want to be the Holy Roman Empire! Good day to you, Sir! | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Nunn the gun
A tag has been placed on Nunn the gun, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable (see the guidelines for notability here). If you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.
Please read the criteria for speedy deletion (specifically, articles #7) and our general biography criteria. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. (talk • contribs) | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"[105]The present definition in the article is: Libertarianism is a philosophy advocating that individuals should be free to do whatever they wish with their person or property, as long as they do not infringe on the same liberty of others. In order to understand what this sentence is saying, we need to know what ""same liberty"" means. At paragraph 89, I break the sentence down into its component parts, substituting for ""the same libery"", what is meant by ""the same liberty"". If you believe my substitution was wrong, then please do your own substitution for the words ""the same liberty"". The sentence as it stands does not define the libertarian right (i.e. libertarianism), because it permits anything to be the ""right"", because it is using ""right"" to define ""right"". In other words under the present ""definition"", A can batter B if B is gay, provided A is willing to let B batter A,if A is gay. This is not permitted under libertarianism, so the present definition doesn't work.
" | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"::::::: So much for the ""user-written encyclopedia,"" and so much for ""consensus."" One administration has waved a magic wand and decided to exclude mention of Sanchez's prostitution, even though Sanchez directly acknowledged it in an article that he wrote, and in a radio interview. WJBscribe, I believe you are acting in violation of several Wikipedia policies, including neutrality, good faith, accuracy, and consensus. Who will administer the administrators?
" | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
As I said, when your block expires, you are more than welcome to correct outstanding problems with the article, provided you stay within the bounds of our neutral point of view policy. | Talk | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Proof
I found this list , claiming no hijackers in it. What is the proof for any hijacker being in the planes? | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
UK A102 Blackwall Tunnel tidal flow stopped
As per the header, the tidal flow has been stopped in that east London, England tunnel. I removed the entry from the article as there is no section for defunct counter flow systems. The original entry is as follows.
* The A102 Blackwall Tunnel - 2 x 2 lane tunnels, in the morning 3 lanes used for northbound (towards the city centre) traffic, 1 lane for southbound traffic, in the evening 2 lanes are provided in both directions. This counterflow system was permanently stopped on 20 April 2007 with reasons given as increased dangereous driver behavior.
See Blackwall Tunnel article for citations and references. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
Csd survey Results
Well, I've posted the results for the -'''' PoppaBalloon'' " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
The forums suck now
Criticisms of the forums should be included, since the forums suck now, because of all the dicksucking. but, uh, there should be a non-vulgar version of this in the article. OH SHIT I'M GONNA GET BANNED NOW I SHOULD NOT MENTION I AM EURO NONYMOUS WHO WAS LOVD UNTIL LOW TAX SAID HE SUCKED THEN HE WAS HATED | [
"toxic",
"profane",
"insult"
] | [
1,
1,
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
He called my opinion nationalist POV and keeps one discussion on multiple pages. See for yourself. and elsewhere too. He gets away with that, and I do not. Double standards in my opinion. ( ). | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
Drop me an email and I'll send you the scan. - " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
I was looking for an actual quote and I only found this: ""The Chechen leader has derided allegations that he dispatched militias to Ukraine"" Again, you don't seem to know what paramilitary means. Just because some rebels ""look like they come from North Caucasus"", does not mean there is a Chechen paramilitary force operating in Eastern Ukraine. You might want to read wiki page on Paramilitary. Educate yourself. " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
Fine. But the manner which you spoke to me on my talk page really pissed me off, I hope you know. Give a heads up, but maybe someone with a good history, those are the people wikipedians should, actually, assume good faith with. And that account is a troll. Only trolls give cookies to a user who just warned them at a level 4 warning. —''''''''''2010 " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
)
Can someone point me where to put a requist for translation? (Mário Rodrigues Filho from pt, actually | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Okay, I'll bite; name a socialist who is not an egalitarian. Citation, please. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
and even corroborated in the case of thew December 11, 1975 Iraqi government advertisements by pro-Zionist organizations | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
Hydrogen ions vs protons
""Hydrogen ion is recommended by the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry as a general term for all ions of hydrogen and its isotopes"" - see Hydrogen ion. A Google search reveals that considerably more botanical articles use ions and ion flux in preference to protons. H+ denotes the provenance of the ion as being from Hydrogen, whereas proton is a sort of Deus ex machina with no hint as to where it originated. " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
It's certainly not vandalism at all, in fact it is simply disgusting behaviour by this user. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
or the mary and the french kindom story, (""god the mother"") (represent all"") (""king the son"")
..." | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
This page is lifted word for word from St. Andrews university web page. Could the author please clarify if they have permission to use it? | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
=fRENCH lANGUAGE
This is the National Library. We understand that you may be the person in charge of front end security. Please explain how we can contact you because we want to convert census and griffiths valuations ino a wiki front end. We are happy that our back is protected, we have commissioned a trustworthy microsoft company. If you have recieved my secomd email I will be happy n we will talk again. If you havent check your inbox and dicuss wiyh your other gmail friends. Anthony Rodgers Ph | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
What's the matter Haworth, affraid I'll win the debate? Unblock it now Mr. gestapo coward. What are you trying to hide? The truth? A media zombie's deffinition of anything but a sound-bite is smear it ""rant"". This is ''heated rhetoric after I recieved a bio attack, per your own Wikipedia rules. Oh, but of course. Wikipedia does not play by the rules." | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
""I think everything is pretty clear and evident here, no need to play innocent dumbfounded angel here. You've manipulated evidence, by deliberately misquoting Mr. Kaye to present a sentence from a Russian manifesto"" thats from adil can you please monitor this page? I added a quote with a reference they accuse me of false references which is on google books, its on two pages the quote the guy is going crazy and he is being uncivil I told him to go check also. Page on Erivan khanate." | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
The City of Victoria was the norminal capital of Hong Kong. (legal definition). In early days, it meant the urban area of Hong Kong. As Hong Kong expanded quickly, the boundary of the City of Victoria means nothing. Nowadays, it is only used by some organisations with long history. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Welcome!
Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Help pages
Tutorial
How to write a great article
Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on , or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!
I would encourage you to read WP:NPOV to make sure you understand Wikipedia's NPOV policy. Some of your edits to Criticism of Mormonism were marginally POV - not enough for me to revert, but leaning towards a biased position. It is important to separate our beliefs from the verifiable facts of an issue. Again, I don't believe you crossed the line, but you seemed pretty close to it.
Once again, thank you for helping make Wikipedia a better place, and I hope to see you contribute more in the future. (Talk) | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"Proposal for renaming ==
This article refers to the 'New World Order' conspiracy theory. Wikipedia policy says ""article naming should prefer what the majority of English speakers would most easily recognize"". This would appear to favour New World Order (conspiracy theory) as the name for the article, as it is a conspiracy theory held by a small fringe group who believe that there is in fact such a conspiracy.
Moreover, naming the article on this conspiracy theory as New World Order (conspiracy) is inconsistent with our naming conflict guideline to ""[c]hoose a descriptive name for an article that does not carry POV implications."" New World Order (conspiracy) implies that there is in fact such a conspiracy, thus endorsing a POV, and a rather objectionable one at that.
== " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
If he built Rodoni Castle, then it is important thing that should have its text in the article? | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
so many ppl tlk on dis stoopid site i swear they must be retarded | [
"toxic"
] | [
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Wanker
Charles Knight is a complete arse wipe. | [
"toxic",
"profane",
"insult"
] | [
1,
1,
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Do you know what happened to the long-serving Biology master, Mr. Gibbons [Zoony] ? I've heard a very duisquieting story about him being assaulted outside tHE cOLLEGE. Is this true ? 212.121.210.45 | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Well if the original post had a ring of a joke to it...It must me alright for you to continue to disrespect the wishes of others that the desk be run in a professional manner. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
If it's help you, I'm looking specifcally for info on what led the author to create the series (or any thing related to its conception/production) or about the manga/anime impact in ""real world"". Basically, info what I could use to create a ""Production"" section and expand ""Reception"", even if it's only a bit. " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
Comment
I would like for you to explain yourself when you said ""I think a better example of hypocrisy is reverting any attempts to make the season articles consistent without an explanation and then using the inconsistency as an argument to change this article."". Otherwise, your arguement is obsolete. 76.107.17.32 " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
EWTN
I was inspired by the life of this great actress, when I viewed her interview this afternoon, on EWTN by Fr. Benedict Groeschel. She is trembling and visibly ill, but is so energetic. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
They haven't deleted the etymology, or at least I haven't seen anyone do it. It seems to me that ""former names"" are being turned into ""names of which the current name derives from"". It reflects a certain POV, but I guess I don't really mind. It's a lot better than erasing it all together. — " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Chang it
hey milburn yes IM back, wat u gona block me again? | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
Concern
I'm concerned of all the userboxes being deleted en masse tonight, as stated in the emails you've kept sending me.... i thought this page might be relevant: WP:POINT. Cheers and good luck with your edits, my friend. and if you're curious as to my signature, i'm in the process of de-imaging it. " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
I'm less inclined to give anyone as much play as RE was given. RE's only virtue was superficial civility on the talk page. This should be a lesson perhaps.
I find that comment amusing as well - freedom of speech isn't the same thing as ""any idiot gets to sharpen their POV"". Too bad we didn't get any WRONG VERSION-style complaints, though we did get a comment on Jimbo's page. TWV stuff is always funny. " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
January 2010
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Conduction (heat), you will be blocked from editing.
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
I don't consider it ridiculous to support Wikipedia policy against original research. As such, I don't consider it ridiculous to ask for a source to be provided for unsourced information, regardless of how reasonable it may seem to you or others. I am not claiming that she isn't Iranian or that she is a slave, but merely raising the possibility to you so that you realize that we need to use sources on Wikipedia. So how about you just find a source that explicitly describes the woman pictured as ""Persian?"" It's as simple as that, assuming that you derived your statement from sources but forgot to note them. This will, however, be much more difficult if your claim is indeed original research (as I suspect). If this is the case, then for the future, please don't add original research to Wikipedia, Zereshk. Thanks in advance for compliance. " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
REDIRECT Talk:James Matthew Stronge | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"You don't attack the only person you're having a discussion with and ask for the article to be locked and then defend it by saying, 'well, if your not one - then he's not talking to you'.
The accusation is the attack and nothing I've said or done here, nor in my recent edit history at the Republican congressman's article referenced above indicates any bias. I notice however that the home page of one of the two editors standing sentry over his pet article has dozens of claims of profound liberal bias proudly festooned across the page like a Volvo in Vermont on it's way to the Northeast Kingdom. One usually finds such committed and messianic people to be deeply wedded to their cause and saturated to the bone with inflexible bias - whether on the left, right or third way.
False unsubstantiated accusations, blatant bias, article ""ownership"" and the complete lack of any effort to defend the inclusion of drivel, garbage and fluff into the encyclopedia is ridiculous and nothing more has been done by the ""guards"" than revert, attack and ignore.99.141.246.39
" | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Images I find on Google are now available to the public to use. I added half the information on the Altiyan Childs page, so don't try and take the credit. If you used your brain, you would know that no where, and I repeat NO WHERE can I see a visible copyright. I don't think someone took the picture from the Kylie Minogue article on their camera, nor the picture from the Spice Girls, Beyonce, Leona Lewis articles. Stop trolling. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
No it is not a trick. Why don';t you email this person which you can do privately and show him how many times I have blogged? I dare you. You won't because you can't. You are lying. My name was posted as a guest editor on a website that you don't like - and I have not ""blogged"" there. I posted maybe once or twice, and have not been back since. I did not even know my and my husband's name were there as guest editors until YOU LINKED TO IT HERE ON WIKIPEDIA>
And would you, Random, please explain to me why I have to justify my reason for not wanting my real name linked to on Wikipedia? Can you show me the policy where it is acceptable to demand a showing of how it can harm me? As it turns out, there is valid reason. But I should not have to defend myself on my reasons. At all. IT is outrageous that you or anyoen even asked. " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
ANYONE WHO SUPPORTS THIS IS FUCKING SICK. MEN AND UNDERAGED FUCKING KIDS?????????????????????????????? WHAT IN THE FUCK YOU ALL SHOULD BE SHOT AND KILLED YOU BUNCH OF FUCKING FAGGOT PEDOPHILES
DIE DIE DIE DIE DI EDIE DIE DIE DIE DIE
DIE DIE DIE DIE DI EDIE DIE DIE DIE DIE
DIE DIE DIE DIE DI EDIE DIE DIE DIE DIE
DIE DIE DIE DIE DI EDIE DIE DIE DIE DIE
DIE DIE DIE DIE DI EDIE DIE DIE DIE DIE
DIE DIE DIE DIE DI EDIE DIE DIE DIE DIE
DIE DIE DIE DIE DI EDIE DIE DIE DIE DIE
DIE DIE DIE DIE DI EDIE DIE DIE DIE DIE
DIE DIE DIE DIE DI EDIE DIE DIE DIE DIE
DIE DIE DIE DIE DI EDIE DIE DIE DIE DIE
DIE DIE DIE DIE DI EDIE DIE DIE DIE DIE
DIE DIE DIE DIE DI EDIE DIE DIE DIE DIE
DIE DIE DIE DIE DI EDIE DIE DIE DIE DIE
DIE DIE DIE DIE DI EDIE DIE DIE DIE DIE
DIE DIE DIE DIE DI EDIE DIE DIE DIE DIE
DIE DIE DIE DIE DI EDIE DIE DIE DIE DIE
DIE DIE DIE DIE DI EDIE DIE DIE DIE DIE
DIE DIE DIE DIE DI EDIE DIE DIE DIE DIE
DIE DIE DIE DIE DI EDIE DIE DIE DIE DIE
DIE DIE DIE DIE DI EDIE DIE DIE DIE DIE
DIE DIE DIE DIE DI EDIE DIE DIE DIE DIE
DIE DIE DIE DIE DI EDIE DIE | [
"toxic",
"profane",
"threat",
"insult",
"hate"
] | [
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
DIE DIE DIE
DIE DIE DIE DIE DI EDIE DIE DIE DIE DIE
DIE DIE DIE DIE DI EDIE DIE DIE DIE DIE
DIE DIE DIE DIE DI EDIE DIE DIE DIE DIE
DIE DIE DIE DIE DI EDIE DIE DIE DIE DIE
DIE DIE DIE DIE DI EDIE DIE DIE DIE DIE
DIE DIE DIE DIE DI EDIE DIE DIE DIE DIE
DIE DIE DIE DIE DI EDIE DIE DIE DIE DIE
DIE DIE DIE DIE DI EDIE DIE DIE DIE DIE
DIE DIE DIE DIE DI EDIE DIE DIE DIE DIE
DIE DIE DIE DIE DI EDIE DIE DIE DIE DIE
DIE DIE DIE DIE DI EDIE DIE DIE DIE DIE
DIE DIE DIE DIE DI EDIE DIE DIE DIE DIE
DIE DIE DIE DIE DI EDIE DIE DIE DIE DIE
DIE DIE DIE DIE DI EDIE DIE DIE DIE DIE
DIE DIE DIE DIE DI EDIE DIE DIE DIE DIE
DIE DIE DIE DIE DI EDIE DIE DIE DIE DIE
DIE DIE DIE DIE DI EDIE DIE DIE DIE DIE
DIE DIE DIE DIE DI EDIE DIE DIE DIE DIE
DIE DIE DIE DIE DI EDIE DIE DIE DIE DIE
DIE DIE DIE DIE DI EDIE DIE DIE DIE DIE
DIE DIE DIE DIE DI EDIE DIE DIE DIE DIE
DIE DIE DIE DIE DI EDIE DIE DIE DIE DIE
DIE DIE DIE DIE DI EDIE DIE DIE DIE DIE
DIE DIE DIE DIE DI EDIE DIE DIE DIE DIE
DIE | [
"toxic",
"profane",
"threat",
"insult",
"hate"
] | [
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
DIE DIE DIE DI EDIE DIE DIE DIE DIE
DIE DIE DIE DIE DI EDIE DIE DIE DIE DIE
DIE DIE DIE DIE DI EDIE DIE DIE DIE DIE
DIE DIE DIE DIE DI EDIE DIE DIE DIE DIE
DIE DIE DIE DIE DI EDIE DIE DIE DIE DIE
DIE DIE DIE DIE DI EDIE DIE DIE DIE DIE
DIE DIE DIE DIE DI EDIE DIE DIE DIE DIE
DIE DIE DIE DIE DI EDIE DIE DIE DIE DIE
DIE DIE DIE DIE DI EDIE DIE DIE DIE DIE
DIE DIE DIE DIE DI EDIE DIE DIE DIE DIE
DIE DIE DIE DIE DI EDIE DIE DIE DIE DIE
DIE DIE DIE DIE DI EDIE DIE DIE DIE DIE
DIE DIE DIE DIE DI EDIE DIE DIE DIE DIE
DIE DIE DIE DIE DI EDIE DIE DIE DIE DIE
DIE DIE DIE DIE DI EDIE DIE DIE DIE DIE
DIE DIE DIE DIE DI EDIE DIE DIE DIE DIE
DIE DIE DIE DIE DI EDIE DIE DIE DIE DIE
DIE DIE DIE DIE DI EDIE DIE DIE DIE DIE
DIE DIE DIE DIE DI EDIE DIE DIE DIE DIE
DIE DIE DIE DIE DI EDIE DIE DIE DIE DIE
DIE DIE DIE DIE DI EDIE DIE DIE DIE DIE
DIE DIE DIE DIE DI EDIE DIE DIE DIE DIE
DIE DIE DIE DIE DI EDIE DIE DIE DIE DIE
DIE DIE DIE DIE DI EDIE DIE DIE DIE DIE
DIE DIE DIE DIE DI EDIE | [
"toxic",
"profane",
"threat",
"insult",
"hate"
] | [
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
DIE DIE DIE DIE
DIE DIE DIE DIE DI EDIE DIE DIE DIE DIE
DIE DIE DIE DIE DI EDIE DIE DIE DIE DIE
DIE DIE DIE DIE DI EDIE DIE DIE DIE DIE
DIE DIE DIE DIE DI EDIE DIE DIE DIE DIE
DIE DIE DIE DIE DI EDIE DIE DIE DIE DIE
DIE DIE DIE DIE DI EDIE DIE DIE DIE DIE
DIE DIE DIE DIE DI EDIE DIE DIE DIE DIE
DIE DIE DIE DIE DI EDIE DIE DIE DIE DIE
DIE DIE DIE DIE DI EDIE DIE DIE DIE DIE
DIE DIE DIE DIE DI EDIE DIE DIE DIE DIE
DIE DIE DIE DIE DI EDIE DIE DIE DIE DIE
DIE DIE DIE DIE DI EDIE DIE DIE DIE DIE
DIE DIE DIE DIE DI EDIE DIE DIE DIE DIE
DIE DIE DIE DIE DI EDIE DIE DIE DIE DIE
DIE DIE DIE DIE DI EDIE DIE DIE DIE DIE
DIE DIE DIE DIE DI EDIE DIE DIE DIE DIE
DIE DIE DIE DIE DI EDIE DIE DIE DIE DIE
DIE DIE DIE DIE DI EDIE DIE DIE DIE DIE
DIE DIE DIE DIE DI EDIE DIE DIE DIE DIENEW | [
"toxic",
"profane",
"threat",
"insult",
"hate"
] | [
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Hi, the recent edit you made to Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Today has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for any test edits you want to make. Thanks. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
The reason for reading an encyclopedia article, in this case one about Japanese, is to learn something about the language. Thus, an encyclopedia article about a language point is indeed a tool/resource/method/whatever for learning (about) the language. Otherwise it is no use. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
You left me no instructions on how to cite sources. If you were truly on Wikipedia to help other users, you would offer help instead of leveling false accusations. By claiming to have left instructions on how to cite sources, you have also lied. What's wrong with you? | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
SL93, I'm ready for an argument right fucking now. I'm sick and fucking tired of your goofball power play. Get a fucking life. You're a joke, a clown and no one will ever take your sorry ass seriously. Get fucked and leave me the fuck alone. I didn't start shit with you, so I don't get what your problem is. Twat. | [
"toxic",
"profane",
"insult"
] | [
1,
1,
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
Talkback
I'm not sure whether you're following the discussion, so I thought I'd let you know here that I've responded to the linked thread. — (talk) " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
No need to write here, the article has its discussion section, ur a physician (in the Ar wiki) caring about others? their opinions?
You can write an admiration section for the Arabic wikipedia. Censoring the rest? you know what does it mean, hostility simply. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
No, you reverted with the logic that the citation didn't meet FA standards. Guess what? FA isn't a binding policy on articles they can lose FA status, and they can regain it. If you don't like the content added, go ahead and improve it, but cut it the fuck out with the wholesale revisions under bullshit deceptive edit summaries. Your behavior does not evince collaboration but battleground mentality and article-ownership; and as an admin, you should really know better. betafive | [
"toxic"
] | [
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Me
Why do you care? You do not know me. Does helping me give you a feeling of self-rightousness? I cannot comprehend your human feelings of caring and compassion. Why do you care? -Peter | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
I have plans to clean-up the Maxie page, I just need to find the time to do such. I've mentioned this prior. TALK! " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
I've made the change to reflect her name as it appears here: http://www.ushmm.org/research/library/faq/details.php?topic=05 | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |