Datasets:

Intuit-GenSRF

/

combined_toxicity_profanity_v2_eval_only

like 0

Follow

Intuit-GenSRF 7

RfA? Have you given any consideration to running for adminship?

I think it's more common in higher mathematics to start at 0, actually. But, more importantly, this is NOT a definition: it's just a convention. —

I have nothing to do with this sock pupperty thing, I had apologized and I dont know what else to do. If you believe that someone else is me, then whoever is accusing me of this should prove it.

" A barnstar for you! The Original Barnstar For your lovely article on Rich Thorne! Happy Holiday's! ""bang!"" "

FYI I started a DRV here.

" If you'll note [contributions, you'll find he hasn't been active in quite some time; you might have better luck asking on a more active Wikipedian's talk page. (Talk) "

BTW, I forgive you for your actions in the past and sorry that I didn't forgive them earlier - I was going a bid tad far and I'm sorry about that.

I would rather not cause drama unintentionally when proposing site bans.

Bbb23 the cunt Bbb23 you are issued from a cunt family, you are a bitch. And hell is coming, and I'm coming with it ;)37.8.170.180

Yes I now provided some information on the image. Thanks.

November 2011 This IP vandalized Inverse-square law although I don't know what good this will do considering all the warnings that this IP has received and yet they continue to vandalize. How about a 6 month ban?

whats your problem??? Will you please stop harassing me? You are constantly attacking me and this is becoming extremely annoying!

FYI, the page tree shaping, allows isp # editing now, if that was a problem, it should not be anymore. In fact things are moving along. In no small part, due to your efforts.

Approximately 1/2 the article is factually incorrect, etc on an don in the article are factually inaccurate statements about the confederate flag, esp as underlying all those statements are a fundamental and flawed understanding entirely of slavery in the US South.... e.g. 99 % of white families in the US South never ever owned any slaves ever so imputing slavery as the basis for fighting in the Civil war and so too the battle flag, the confederate flag, has that fundamental flawed distorted view ... Add to that that northerners were almost 100 % the ship owners and ship captains that brought all slaves over to the US South ; and add to that , that black kings, chiefs were the ones who sold into slavery, all the slaves that were in the US South... and so on and on the story is one of fundamental distortion... And of the % of whites in South who owned slaves, they have all been dead 150 years... further add to the fact that for 100 % of white Southerners, the flag has always represented Valor in battle of the 600,000 approximately white southerners who died in the war... Add to that the war began due to invasion by North and the 100 % felt view of white southerners that states rights then was the main issue and to a very small view , slavery way below that esp as those 99 % of confederate soldiers and their families did not own and had never owned slaves.... TO distort and warp all this factual history into black mania about the battle esp of valor, being a rascist symbol further massively distorted e.g. by us media as CNN is simply put, mass HYSTERIA with no , almost no foundation in fact .... please add all this to revise the bottom 1/2 of the article which has those endless wrong factual distortions.... Kareen Abdulla Selassie, Imp of Ethiopia Sr 47.18.43.166

Why naturally, it was expected of the troll. What I didn't expect was the surprisingly punitive response from the apparently malleable and novice admin that blocked me. If I cared enough, I would probably report both, but I couldn't be bothered, I don't suffer from vaginitis. Someone does however need ventilate the pervasive odor of troll that lingers over the project and threatens to halt any further progress.

RockfangBot Per my comments at Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/RockfangBot 3: could you keep me posted about how this bot operation goes? I'm very curious about what sort of abnormalities show up. (I'll watch this page.) Thanks, – (talk)

" (e/c x 11) hey yous this is a really easy question but where is the complement in this sentence, The man read a long book and then went to his cozy bed but before he did that he jumped into his pajamas first!! ǀ T C "

" Oh, I see, it was only in theaters for 3 months, than on came on VHS, 5 months later. I'll have to take a look at it & see what I can find. When I watched my copy of ""3 Men & a Baby"", it had the 1984 FBI warnings & a different version of the ""Also From Touchstone"" bumper. Instead, the logo just fades in & says ""Ask your video dealer now about perchasing this hit title also from Touchstone Home VIdeo"" in white words with a different voiceover. Then, there's only 1 trailer for ""Good Morning Vietnam"" & a different version of the FP logo. Instead, the logo just fades in again, with the words all capitalized in white & a different voiceover's heard & the film begins after that. "

You people! You crack me up! You're breaking my heart! 173.97.227.106

More Tricks from Novaseminary Here is his wikicommons talk page. Same editor.... same problems... Please STOP now You've been here for 2 years, yet you've only got 60 edits, only 25 of which are to images. You clearly don't understand what you're doing, so I suggest you STOP now, before I have to bring your actions to the attention of an admin. Beyond My Ken (talk) Nice use of contribution history and bold and italics. The Buck buck photo you are so worked up about makes a claim of PD, but not of being the photographer, as I noted on your talk. Novaseminary (talk) Well, Ken is obviously not interested in any posts to his talk page... Here was my question (cut and pasted from what Ken deleted unread from his talk), maybe if he is monitoring here, he will help. Or maybe not. I didn't mean to irritate you or get into it with you on the three photos I tagged. One of them seemed to have been pulled from a student server and the PD status seemed unclear to me. You just reverted what I thought to be good tags without explaining why or pointing to a policy that allows for it. I had tagged several similar files ages ago and they were deleted, with a few coming through with OYTRS and staying. Anyway, of the few files I tagged just now, you did not revert my tag on this logo. Do you agree with the tag? This seems to me to be precisely the type of thing we need OTRS persmission for - a file from a commercial website now claimed by an uploader to be released. I don't mean to be a pain, and maybe you are not interested in helping others out, but if you disagree with this one, maybe you could briefly explain why? Novaseminary (talk)

Someone please include the format of the Nongshim Cup. As best I can tell from GoGameGuru, the 2015-16 series started with four games by the same player, which seems unusual for a tournament. https://gogameguru.com/ichiriki-ryo-17th-nongshim-cup/

I don't think we should say Yammy's the strongest yet. There's probably a catch to him being number 0; it wouldn't make since for Aizen to leave his strongest Espada in Hueco Mundo. We can't, however, assume that Yammy's lying about the rankings; it's obviously an important plot point that Kubo wanted to establish this chapter. 207.80.142.5

OrphanBot So, what should we do? We're both want him out of Wikipedia. Micoolio101

Real Evil Little C U N T

Nice SMEAR Job Wikipedia The inmates truly ARE running the asylum here. You know you're in troble when a bona fide Christ hater like Captainktainer is the one telling you guys to cool it on the quotes. Bachmann's Wikipedia article is a smear, hate and slime HIT piece. Yet her liberal opponent's wikpideia article is essentially a hagiography. No wonder they're starting a 'new' wikiepdia, huh?

I've removed the speedy tag from Ayloo Milaki, since it clearly asserts notability, and added a reference per WP:BLP. Thanks for the articles.

"==Just as a courtesy,== "

Tekken ^ On G4 they said tekken will be on #60 also. http://www.g4tv.com/thefeed/blog/post/689944/Tekken_6_On_The_PS3_360_Fall_2009.html .

|| Anthony Davidson ||

Edit request from 71.55.147.129, 14 November 2010 ddd 71.55.147.129

HAHAHA OF COURSE I WAS A VANDAL!!!!

Thankyou, Gareth, that's very kind. Is that mound really made of loose sand, I wonder? If so, how do they stop it slumping in the rain? (The designer in me is thinking of practicalities...)

":::::Well we'll never know ) Fever "

" stop stupid acusations I find it unacceptable to delete peoples contribution without any comments. I have now been repeated acused of writing a long rant while all my modifications thereof have been reverted. There is no OFFICIAL evidence incriminating Osama as the eavil doer. This reenforces why all acusations of muslim terrorist attack should have proper quotation. If you lack such sources (which I claim you do) we do not need your opinion to provide the rest of reality. Your lies as ""the truth"" here in wikipedia The suggestion there would be sufficient proof or even mainsteam consensus about the event is a clear lie. I personally find it unimaginable that wikipedia has a page where Muslim Extremists are claimed to be the cause leaving no room for any sensible explaination. no referrences to Obstruction of justice huh? The article should clearly mention the great effort the Bush administration made of hiding all the evidence. This was the main embodyment of the attack. Obstruction of justice of this scale is a far bigger crime as murder. FOLLOW THE MONEY! The page should mention Lary Silverstein owned the building for a day and a half and maxed out the insurance for multiple terrorist attacks. Thus he cashed in multiple times. the muslim extreamist terrorists label kit A discussion about using the word Terrorist seems to provide an interesting vessle to obstruct the discussion. It has repeatedly been made clear the word terrorist attack can be used to explain the event but there is no ground to keep calling those who staged the event muslim extreamist terrorists."

" There are plenty of places where I'm being discussed, by editors who have been highly involved, you see just a tiny sample of that above. I prefer not to respond, generally, it is when I see serious harm being done in conjunction with it that I become tempted to respond. So as a question, would I have been allowed to respond to the comments above about me? (Not ""would it be wise,"" that's a different question, but allowed.) No rush. Thanks. "

Did not know that article exists. It's fair to put that information there.

Maybe you're right. Barneca is a really mean and horrible admin, i dunno about the rest. What other encyclopedia sites are there like this. I cant be bothered to contribute around here with evil shits like Barneca running the place.

Comment The genocidal campaign carried out against the people of Bangladesh warrants more than a line or two. Not only were 3million people killed there were 200,000 to 400,000 women raped. This is recognized under international as attempted genocide. I believe what JCAla has written needs to be expanded upon, not cut down.

Leaping in late, we already reflect the views of homeopaths. We describe homeopathy as they see it. We also describe it as the real world sees it, in terms of what is objectively verifiable, which is of course different. Ullman is a massively unreliable source anyway, he routinely misrepresents sources and repeats egregious errors even after they have been pointed out multiple times. There are three problems with homeopathy: there is no reason to suppose it should work, there is no way it can work, and there is no credible evidence it does work (other than as placebo). That is the consensus view of scientists who have reviewed the evidence base. Fixing these problems is not Wikipedia's job. Guy ()

":::::::Was it the word ""prevented""? I'll bet it was the word ""prevented"" that is tripping you up. "

I was asked to look at this. If that text at JVL isn't free, or isn't from a PD source, then the article as it stands today is still a copyvio significant sections are close to identical. The claim that the text was originally from a public domain source needs to be documented; until it is, having the page replaced with the Possible Copyvio tag is appropriate. —

Creation of set index article Per discussion with , I've created a set index article to list together all the films that are named after him. If there are any suggestions or concerns, please let us know. Thanks,  (talk | contrib) (ping me)

Dude, that was slashdot-style flaimbait. You could have just ignored me. Anyway, it seems my sense of humor is seriously degrading after long studing hours... (talk)

" TPG I understand and appreciate your sympathetic relations with China, but Wikipedia simply isn't the place to flirt online with profanity, vulgarity, and biased viewpoints. I deeply apologize for my consistent undoing, but it must continue until you can send me reliable proof from the admins that the rule you state is under Wikipedian law. I hope we can solve this matter peacefully, not foolishly. I wish you the best of luck.71.146.145.81 Per talk page guidelines, removal of others' comments (without their permission), so long as they pertain to the topic, are not trolling, and keep in line with WP:FORUM, is strictly prohibited. GotR Talk Haha, ""trolling"". I made a valid comment, pointing out that you were wrong. You should apologize to the above IP editor alsofor restoring ""profanity, vulgarity, and biased viewpoints"" in clear contradiction of talk page guidelines; again, the IP had every right, even the obligation, to remove it, specifically according to WP:TPO, ""Removing harmful posts"". You can, if you like, refer to my editing as trolling, but that's a personal insult, and next time you ask me to do something as an administrator I'm going to make damn sure that you are not wasting my or anyone else's time. BTW, an IP just posted about your edits on my talk page. What, as an administrator, shall I tell them about someone who acted in disagreement with talk page guidelines and let biased ethnic insults stand? Do I need to inform you of WP:BITE as well? That's a rhetorical question: I know what I will answer, and I also know that I won't be pasting a templated warning here for you, though that's well within my right. You know by now, I think, what you should have done, and I will let the matter be unless you escalate. Thank you. I am waiting for your apology, Guerilla of the Renmin! If I do not receive it in 24 hours, I will request a block for you! By the way, I'm really the same person. I'm just using multiple IP addresses in case

you try to request a block for me!76.126.227.27 "

I think Sandy is capable enough of defending herself on her own, and does not need wiki-lawyers going aroung sending warnings. If she wants to warn Wikidea about what she perceives as a misconduct, or if she wants to point out possible infringements of Wiki-policies by Wikidea or any other user, she can do it herself, as she has already done it once in the FAR in question. Any other non-asked interventions like the one I read above are not helpful at all.

" Dude, generally speaking this has grown beyond that. I'm not sure, to me it just was suspicious that the numbers clearly contradicted themselves (and thus were in fact not reliable) but other unreliable sources (from seperatists) were not accepted. I suggested to Gloucester how at least the issue of whether or not the Speratists or the Ukranians broke the deal concerning peaceful withdrawl could be researched objectively but he wasn't interested. Saying that he is only interested in reposting things from ""reliable sources"" (in this case unreliable). - This was in relation to a post of mine here that got deleted. Concerning this specific post...I'm not even sure what the seperatist are claiming atm but IMO it should be added. Anyway, every death in this sad war is a sad death. 78.68.210.173 "

" Apologies Your message to a producers on our Social Innovation Conversations podcast channel made its way to me. We did indeed have a policy for our editors to post links on Wikipedia, as we thought this was a proper use of the site. We understand that this is contrary to your policies, and I have corrected the workflow here such that our editors and producers will instead suggest links to Wikipedia editors (via ""talk"") rather than post them directly. Thanks for the clarification and for your help with the high quality of Wikipedia content. Please let me know if you get any more inappropriate postings from The Conversations Network. Doug Kaye, Executive Director The Conversations Network A 501(c)(3) Non-Profit "

Update most links with requested information as the Wikicite template is back up. Found some dead links and better links; but so much for my extra hour today. - Boy

{{unblock|I am a misunderstood genius who is being blocked by mentally retarded transmidgetards. I hope that by running for president I will be able to fire you all. (Accountin4Taste can go to heck)

I never said we need to cover up the fact. I said that the fact is irrelevant to anal sex, and the way it is presented in the article leads to a colorful and inaccurate interpretation of male-male anal sex. It is not the most straight-forward way to explain pleasure from male receptive anal sexit is factually and logically a roundabout way to do it, and it is misleading. Really, that's what the issue is. As I have several times mentioned, the only thing that is relevant to anal sex is that prostate stimulation can be pleasureable; it's homology with the Skene's gland is completely irrelevant. Also, do you think that the psychological factor plays no role in receptive pleasure? I personally think that it plays a larger role than the prostate does, but it isn't mentioned once in the article.

The article is biased in favor of jews because the first line of the article says jew watch is an anti-semitic web site, which means if the average joe reads that will think the site is one big malicious lie, which it isn't even close 99% of the facts on jew watch are accurate. Jew watch is one of the most scholarly libraries in existence on the jews. Jew watch article is 100% jewish POV.

We clearly need to see if the rest of the committee back FT2's suggestion.

" Still The Achilles' Heel of Wikipedia. Maybe someone who checks in on this talk page might now where to go with it? First, a public reply to Dragons flight, (and maybe his own sockpuppet ""Freestylefrappe""): Hardly a ""sockpuppet"" when I used the very same name.... followed by a ""2"". Or are you talking about blocking Pgio ""too"", who simply agreed that someone here is quite a J_rk? I asked so clearly that you wouldn't take away WMC's opportunity to block me himself.... I would have been proud. But you knew that too, right? Wikipedians: I freely admit, that my own level of civility here has lowered.... even against my own admonishment to others to avoid such behavior. All I can say, is that it is a VERY difficult dynamic to avoid when some here play by such despicably manipulative and base rules of engagement. I'm thinking of that dichotomy between people who claim that their Ends or so worthy, that they should get a pass on their occasional stray from acceptable means, vs. those who retain some hold on the idea that they will be judged by their Means, no matter the final outcome. This is made all the more difficult where users such as Admin WMC, who know full well the self imposed limits of their opponents, demand verbal civility on one hand, and yet play such extensive games of ""pretend to forget"", ""I didn't see that"" written ten times before, and ALWAYS selectively choose the lowest hanging fruit in a nest of specific challenges to their type of behavior, contributions, and edits. Worldly people understand the sensitive nature of situations like these. Educated people (especially those through the School of Hard Knocks) know that these situations are more often set-ups, initiated by the manipulator. The manipulator has at least learned the fine art of camouflage where they can hide very well 'in plain sight' flying the banner of Democracy. Failing to acknowledge this simple possibility, marks one as either the manipulator, or just a pseudo-intellect. As I've said before, and will say again.... If users like WMC were genuine

, they'd acknowledge human fallibility and the basic rights of dissident opinion. Doing so, WMC would quickly gain my support of his presentations on mainstream understanding. He gets that part right VERY OFTEN and has demonstrated a tenacity to seeing his POV upheld. Good for him, and why I have absolutely no trouble with his dominance over others trying to write articles presenting such information. Yet why? Why does he refuse to acknowledge his lack of verse in material outside of his very public field of knowledge? Why does he go so far in his chilling drive to stifle the good faith presentations of non-mainstream fields? Please, I'm not just talking about aether theories alone. The electric fields have plenty to say about corollary/causal dynamics in cogent presentations about a very possible relationship to atmospheric phenomenon. Damn if WMC shouldn't be reading some of that stuff instead of JUST pointing out how it's counter to the formulas used in current Climate Models. I mean, just forget about the LONG history of trial and repeated errors in aether postulation, the mysteries of electricity still surround us and we would all benefit by keeping an open mind about that. In the least, do we really think it wise to insist by near constant omission, any possibility that Birkeland or Alfvén currents effect our conductive atmosphere. I'm not saying that WMC's models need to be trashed or even that he should modify them this afternoon, but it's highly suspicious that he suppresses the postulations and formulations from even the notable sources working on competitive modeling. It is so suspicious, that is why I question his objectivity, and point out that he IS a PAID agent of tax dollars vested in a particular model. That he doesn't acknowledge and recuse himself, is just annoying to say the least. That Wikipedia doesn't impose some boundaries on this user's blinding conflict of interest, casts a far greater doubt upon Wikipedia NPOV all together. "

I wasn't sure who tagged it but I was fairly sure it wasn't !

You still seem to be intent on getting 'your way' on the page, despite it's errors in format, style, and grammar. I suggest you read this essay WP:OWN, and learn a little about Wikipedia. Thank You.

Family background Any information about his family background?

category whats the category for lgbt people? i think it should be added

So you want to cover up your underhanded deeds? Do you think that I am the only one who noticed your ways? If you don't want people to find out, then why do it at all? Not every web surfer only skims through wiki once and leave forever. Some come back again and again and when they do that, they WILL notice what you are doing.

" Unspecified source for Image:Bcgpc.PNG Thanks for uploading Image:Bcgpc.PNG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged. As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after . If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? hi! "

" IF YOU'RE ALLUDING TO BLOCKING OF MY ACCOUNT. Then I obviously don't want that. BUT IF YOU CAN really DELETE MY ACCOUNT ACCOUNT(like there will be no record of me ever being here). Then I sincerely say, PLEASE delete it. But Mind you, I'm not talking about ""only blocking my page"". I'm talking about whole account deletion which I think not possible for me to do. Maybe you know how to do it. (Talk if you want) "

" Replaceable fair use Image:Elaine Tan Eastenders fancard.jpg Thanks for uploading Image:Elaine Tan Eastenders fancard.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please: Go to the image description page and edit it to add , without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all. Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself. If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — (?) "

Thanks for the explanation!

No, your the one saying only over weight people eat grilled chicken sandwich. Its not fair and its opinion based.

" Happy International Women's Day Award for a great woman On the internet no one knows if you're a dog, but I think you're of the female persuasion. Against kitchen slavery, and for women's writing: this award presented to a deserving woman. "

REDIRECT Talk:UFC Fight Night: Belfort vs. Henderson 2

Bjerknes' site gives a long list of published references for Einstein's having plagiarized Poincaré for Relativity and E=mc2.

And incidentally I know that much of what Cla68 says via the Reg is false because I was on the mailing list form the outset and I told him it was false and he was rebuffed from the mailing list which is why, I think, he took it to the Reg in order to weasel it in here. Cnyical, shameful, and in the end of no actual lasting relevance or significance. The mailing list still exists.

So I'm not allowed to erase people's harrasing messages of off my own talk page?

that would be fine.. but we don't need to cover every single program.. I mean how about something like appeared on cnn, foxnews etc.. rather then list every program fox news has.. every date etc..etc..etc.. just my two cents -

You're unbelievable. Good luck in life, prolifer.

Just curious. I looked at the wall of proposals at the Gamergate proposed decision page. I think I counted at least 22 different people making proposals, sometimes in the number of dozens of proposals per person. Do you retiring arbitrators have the chance to, basically, run away from that case at the end of the year, which I would try to do in the same position, or are you more or less honor bound to wade through that morass of type until the final decision is made?

" Reference improvement Thanks for the help with SK. Any reason you are not using the authorlink parameter? example | reply here "

FUCK YOU, YOU FUCKING DIRTY KIKE. YOU SUPPORT THOSE WHO VANDALIZE PAGES, NOW IT IS TURNED ON YOU

" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Round Lake, Illinois. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing.  | talk "

Changeover occurs at Acton Central to/from overhead AC. The freight spur is not electrified.

Why haven't I received a response by the individual who imposed the block?

User: Bosnian Royal Family Thanks for correcting the links. Now I would appreciate if you stayed away from a private space.

Oh really. Well then stop making bullsht edits and taking away everything that contradicts the mainstream yellow journalism going on. There isn't neutral point of views on Wikipedia. This site is a joke. FCK YOU. Stop sending me messages on your stupid fcking system. I don't give a sht about what you have to say. As a matter of fact I don't even know who the fck im talking to or if I am even talking to someone real. Once again. FCK YOU AND THIS BULLSHT WIKIPEDIA WANNA BE ENCYCLOPEDIA. IT WILL NEVER HAPPEN. NOTHING THIS WEBSITE SAYS WILL EVER BE CONSIDERED VERIFIED!!!!!!

F'UCK YOU ADMINISTRATORS (I WILL BE BACK TO TROLL YOU MORONS) Just a message.

"Hmm. Ok so we might be miners digging from opposite sides on this one. I think there are two separate points to clarify. 1) I agree that we have two competing systems of measurement, and I don't mind them both being on the same page. I guess we just have to decide which is the ""default"" (by which a monarch moves or is placed above/below a near neighbour). Basically, I feel that if we had two dead monarchs whose reigns were VERY close to each other, but where the absolute days conflicted with years/days, we should have years/days override absolute days and perhaps include a footnote to draw attention to the overlap. Anything else would appear like a mistake. I've just checked, and so far, none of our close ties present too much of a conflict for now. 2) What to do when Bhumibol, Elizabeth, and Tuanku approach another monarch in table one. My feeling is that these problems are unique, momentary events that resolve themselves: once a monarch ""in motion"" (alive) passes a monarch ""in stasis"" (dead!), they move up the list. The problem at stake (and this happens only a few times a year) is precisely WHEN to move them. Since they don't move up automatically (one of us does it manually), we are bound to be inaccurate: I'm in the Central time zone of North America, so WHEN exactly did Bhumibol surpass Victoria - his time zone, hers, mine - and if I change it in the evening versus the morning, what day does that constitute? To be honest, we usually make changes when we think to check the page and manually move a monarch. I'm okay with that. "

Question? Just I want to know this not to write it. Please please please tell me if you know, Which cannon is more stronger and why? Destiny Gundam or the Gunner Zaku or Blast Impulse pease help me if you know or tell anyone to answer it please please please, And I'm very sorry.

I've reinstated the redirect. At the very least, I'd expect a fully formatted article by those who want an article on Deleon himself. Nevertheless, the valid objection that Deleon is notable solely for the murders would still stand even in the case of a half-way acceptable article here. 78.34.136.182

" Headline text Questions and comments Ms. Barber wrote: ""In a united effort, the ISSR Licensed Breeders only produce approximately 200 pups per year"" ''''' Ms. Barber-How many of those puppies were ""produced"" by your kennel? What specific health testing do you conduct on your dogs? You, and those supporting your club/registry, have been respectfully asked for this information numerous times during this discussion yet you continue to ignore these legitimate requests, while appearing rude, insulting, superior-minded, and frankly an entirely offensive and inarticulate representative of this breed you ""founded"" and the other breeders affiliated with your registry. I certainly hope other breeders affiliated with your organization do not present themselves to the public in the same way you do, as I can't imagine anyone with any intelligence and self-esteem would be willing to tolerate such unprofessional behavior, much less purchase any puppies/dogs from people who conduct themselves the way you have in this discussion. You claim a lot, but you provide no independent support for your claims, only your own writings on your own website. You claim anyone ""producing"" dogs other than you or your registry are frauds, yet you are unwilling to prove how this is true other than offering some photos YOU have taken of these dogs and your own rantings, as evidence. You claim breeders unaffiliated with you are ""in it for the money"", yet you ignore the fact that: You produce more of these dogs than almost all other breeders combined, through your wholly and co-owned breeding dogs. Your website (http://www.newzionshilohs.org/upcoming_litters.htm) for this Winter alone, shows you are ""producing"" ELEVEN litters at New Zion and through co-ownership breedings. Eleven litters, even conservatively speaking, could easily produce over 100 PUPPIES! And, you are planning for 20 more litters next Spring and Summer! You also currently list over 25 stud dogs and over 25 females you are considering for breeding! You charge a lot of money for each puppy you produce ($900-$2500+)and you contractually reserve the

right, at your own discretion, to substitute a puppy from a buyer's desired litter to another compatible (again, based on your own determination) litter AFTER the buyer has submitted payment to you. (see: http://www.newzionshilohs.org/Policies_N_Prices.htm.....""New Zion reserves the right to substitute any litter of equal/higher value that is compatible with your exact requirements"") You require your puppy-buyers to not only pay you for puppies at the time of purchase, but you also require them to sign contracts promising future puppy and breeding rights, in order to profit from the dog not only now but also throughout his/her life. You have no stated policy on your website page (http://www.newzionshilohs.org/Policies_N_Prices.htm) re: your own commitment to rescue and make/find a home for for any of the puppies/dogs you ""produce"", should they become unwanted, homeless and/or end up in shelters or abusive situations. Your ""Policies and Prices"" make no mention of a contractual requirement or even a suggestion by you (with the signed contractual commitment of your puppy-buyers) to spay/neuter their new ""pets"", in order to reduce overpopulation of this breed and dogs, in general. I could find nowhere on your website where the horrifying statistics of unwanted/euthanzied dogs in the U.S. (2 million +, including 25% of which are purebred dogs) is responsibly addressed by someone actively promoting and engaged in the proliferation of this explosion. Your website does not list any references, such as recommending/governing affiliations (i.e. Better Business Bureau), approval ratings (i.e. OFA, Penn-Hip, CERF), or other professional organizations to which you belong (ie. American Dog Owner's Association, the the Delta Society [therapy], dog training or agility organizations, etc.), only your own dog club(SSDCA), you own dog registry (ISSR), your own literature (except some very limited information by Dr. Padgett

and numerous and righteous religious and biblical quotations). You are the ""Chairman"" of the board of directors for your registry's dog club, the SSDCA (which charges for membership and participation in club activities). There is also no arbitration committee available within this organization to negotiate/override any challenges to your decisions. You control the ISSR dog registry, which charges puppy owners/breeders numerous fees for numerous types of registration papers and other background information, not to mention also deciding if/when/where/how any breeders in your registry are allowed to breed their dogs. There is also no arbitration committee available within this organization to negotiate/override

To 75.0.177.144, the author of the article possesses no knowledge of the ethnicity of spanish people. He thinks that only those born anglo-saxon are white. He doesn't believe that other people can be white. This is a manifestation of ignorance, pure and simple. By the way, who is this jeanne boleyn? Why is she commenting on this page as if she were the author? She's not the author of this article. What the hell?

" Editing for style In ""A simplified example,"" I found having the reference to Newton's Second Law at the beginning of the sentence interrupted the description of what was happening to movement of the charged particles, so I moved it to the end of the sentence and added the equation, F = ma. "

Well yes, they are out to get you, didn't you know ?

Crisps We did have another article called crips and you yanks merged the pages either both food stuffs need to be covered equally or we need our article back you cant just endlessly revert VALID changes

So... Asking someone to mind their own business, and asking someone to make sure they have read something correctly so they don't believe they are being insulted is incivil is it? As for the french comment, I actually think that was immature, and should not have been done. Next time, why don't you do some research into what you are saying, so you know exactly what you mean, because sure as hell I don't!

Poem Thanks for that, gave me a good laugh, see Have a gorilla

"::::There are many acupuncturists who describe the ""science behind their practice"". We provide citations to these claims in this list. "

Yaaasss well done there ben , looks good. Hopefully its onwards and upwards for the geo elite.

Please, see WP:CITE and repair citations.

" If your section is not titled appropriately, including no attacking, no aggressive or hostile or ""weasel words"" such as ""motor vehicle"", ""compliance"", ""attorney"", or ""respect"", and an actual description of the actual thing you are actually talking about. If you do not use an appropriate title then your comment will be deleted and 100% ignored in all ways, regardless of the reason for the comment, a staff position of the human or person making the comment, or any other reason whatsoever. If you cannot title your section reasonably and descriptively, then your comment has not and does not exist.''"

Another question, does this style information stripping occur only whenever a shape itself is edited, or for less intrusive edits, such as moving a shape around? If even highlighting and selecting the shape in Inkscape makes it unusable, then I shouldn't even be messing with Inkscape at all.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Dalderdj That person only moved, no asking as you say. Who's wrong here? Go and talk with him too, why only with me?

Aboriginal title - GAN