text
stringlengths 0
3.14k
| labels
sequence | encoded_labels
sequence |
|---|---|---|
"
Lift the protection
In survey to lift:
Suppport ≈talk≈
In opposition to lift:" | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"::::: No, ""one"" would not assume that knowledge about alcoholism is the same as or implies knowledge about Alcoholics Anonymous, and I'm not even sure that he qualifies and an ""eminent"" expert on alcoholism. I also see you followed or found the link I provided for you yesterday. Yes, like I said then, the Knol is very good, but like it is also self-published. Since it is non peer-reviewed it cannot be used to establish credibility as an expert on any topic.
I have a life outside of Wikipedia and this edit warring and the exacting arguments to get self-published sources included in this article is really taking up more time than I can spend here. I'm taking this article back off my watch list you win the war of attrition. Congratulations on having the time and energy to spend all day on Wikipedia bikeshedding. You've successfully pushed your POV (to it's detriment), decreased the quality of the article, and again frustrated me passed my capacity to collaborate on this article. Have a nice day.
" | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Of course. I was planning on creating one for the 2006 Finals. - talk | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
Text copy/pasted from feminist blog
""Not all people . . . women of color are overrepresented[13]""
I'm not familiar with Wikipedia's policies on reliable sources and copyright infringement, but I strongly suspect that this violates at least two. Removing until further argued. 108.66.52.134 " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
Well, the Royal Marines are certainly not an independent service branch of the armed forces as are the Navy, Army or Air Force. Ping me " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
But that doesn't take into account the many movements throughout the history of Christianity that have not agreed with Catholic, Orthodox, and Protestant ideas. They may have been suppressed and outnumbered by the 3 main branches. They may have lost the debate but they were in the debate. Just as Mormons are in the debate. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
I am disengaging from this conversation because it is going nowhere. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
I say unto thou, mercy ! | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"By the way, I appreciate you completing skipping over the first step of punishment for ""personal attacks"". You gave me no warning, which I am due for a first offense. You went straight to a block. Thank you for abusing your power, or just being plain ignorant to the guidlines and rules of the site in which you are an admin to.
" | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
July 2007 (UTC)
Yes, I have found some of those sources on the website: Apparently you were correct to concentrate on the excavation methods as the foundation seems to be very un-interesting; I was expecting an elaborate deep foundation system. Apparently it is just a spread footing cast on rock. I looked for a natural place in the article to integrate that, but I am not sure where it should go. I did, however, add a sentence from one of those sources on why slurry walls were used instead of conventional methods. 00:51, 11 | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
stfu u deleted our page. tool. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
The issue is with a misrepresentation of the available sources. The correct representation of this incident both from the police, the involved parties and the MSM reporting involve ""alleged"", ""possibly stolen"", ""leaked"" as well as ""stolen"" and ""hacked"". There's absolutely no reasion for us to only report half of everything because someone wants to go WP:OR and say that it's ""obviously a hack"". See this discussion (amongst others). " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Vandalism
There's been some vandalism on this article. Thought I'd bring this to people's attention. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
didn't sign this so u cant ban me as u don't know who wrote this sloppy ass cunt fuck your warning and fuck your mum. and gg I didn't sign this so u cant ban me as u don't know who wrote this sloppy ass cunt fuck your warning and fuck your mum. and gg I didn't sign this so u cant ban me as u don't know who wrote this sloppy ass cunt fuck your warning and fuck your mum. and gg I didn't sign this so u cant ban me as u don't know who wrote this sloppy ass cunt fuck your warning and fuck your mum. and gg I didn't sign this so u cant ban me as u don't know who wrote this sloppy ass cunt fuck your warning and fuck your mum. and gg I didn't sign this so u cant ban me as u don't know who wrote this sloppy ass cunt fuck your warning and fuck your mum. and gg I didn't sign this so u cant ban me as u don't know who wrote this sloppy ass cunt fuck your warning and fuck your mum. and gg I didn't sign this so u cant ban me as u don't know who wrote this sloppy ass cunt fuck your warning and fuck your mum. and gg I didn't sign this so u cant ban me as u don't know who wrote this sloppy ass cunt fuck your warning and fuck your mum. and gg I didn't sign this so u cant ban me as u don't know who wrote this sloppy ass cunt fuck your warning and fuck your mum. and gg I didn't sign this so u cant ban me as u don't know who wrote this sloppy ass cunt fuck your warning and fuck your mum. and gg I didn't sign this so u cant ban me as u don't know who wrote this sloppy ass cunt fuck your warning and fuck your mum. and gg I didn't sign this so u cant ban me as u don't know who wrote this sloppy ass cunt fuck your warning and fuck your mum. and gg I didn't sign this so u cant ban me as u don't know who wrote this sloppy ass cunt fuck your warning and fuck your | [
"toxic",
"profane",
"insult"
] | [
1,
1,
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
mum. and gg I didn't sign this so u cant ban me as u don't know who wrote this sloppy ass cunt fuck your warning and fuck your mum. and gg I didn't sign this so u cant ban me as u don't know who wrote this sloppy ass cunt fuck your warning and fuck your mum. and gg I didn't sign this so u cant ban me as u don't know who wrote this sloppy ass cunt fuck your warning and fuck your mum. and gg I didn't sign this so u cant ban me as u don't know who wrote this sloppy ass cunt fuck your warning and fuck your mum. and gg I didn't sign this so u cant ban me as u don't know who wrote this sloppy ass cunt | [
"toxic",
"profane",
"insult"
] | [
1,
1,
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
I understand. It's great that you really trying to contribute to Wikipedia (unlike other users). I'll tell you what, I'll remove my CSD notice. It's clear that you will be able to expand this article in the future. So just keep doing what your doing and it should be fine. Happy editing! | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
IT'S MY TALK PAGE YOU FAGGOT | [
"toxic",
"profane",
"insult"
] | [
1,
1,
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Until before 50 years, jews had same status with blacks.You were not allowed to prestigious places.But that has changed by investing money on media...
Don't forget; Nazis were praised about what they have done against jews in USA... | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Wait a sec, it would appear that CHORSEL is a real game. My apologies for my error. If you wish I will rewrite your edits for you. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
It's a lost cause, guys; power-trippers, pointy-haired clueless bosses, unveiled al-takeyya propagandists, and assorted other lying assholes and ""fact-massagers"" run this place now. And Feloneous? Your suggestion of servility danged on your own talk page merits a ""You can suck my cockonce more, with *feeling*"" rejoinder. The *mechanics* of the thing mandate Wiki becoming just another place with inmate's-shit-smeared walls; and there'll be no great loss in just blowing the place off because, unlike REAL earth-space, the internet is infinite. When it bellies-up, there will be a dozen better replacements for it. " | [
"toxic"
] | [
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
I removed them. pika " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
User page
You do not deserve this. Removal of an AfD tag is a crime punishable by speedy deletion of the article in question. However, I have been kind and made Pinafore Pirates your user page as someone suggested in the AfD discussion. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
I created that essay as something unto which to refer people, rather than having to rehash the rationale thereïn every time the reasons applied, not to give my views an aura of authority. Attested Wiktionary entries are, meanwhile, truly authoritative, in that they prove a given word’s existence, and, in the case of preëmptive, show the word’s recent use. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Videogame Nation interview
I'm beginning to upload my vidcap of Matthew Smith's interview at the Videogame Nation exhibition at the Manchester Urbis, here. Suggested citation fields: {{cite interview |last=Smith |first=Matthew |subjectlink=Matthew Smith (games programmer) |interviewer=Drury, Paul |title=Manic Musings |url=http://www.urbis.org.uk/page.asp?id=3333 |format=Video |program=Videogame Nation |city=Manchester |date=2009-07-19 }} Subtituting the url for a link to an appropriate video segement. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
p135 ... The secularism of the Zionists made them immediately unacceptable to the Jews who then resided in the Holy Land. While Arab opposition remained primarily political, the rejection of Zionism and, later, of the State of Israel by traditionial Jews was deeply rooted in their Judaism and was hardly influenced by political considerations. ... the Haredim were alarmed at the danger of the divine punishment that the actions of those whom they viewed as miscreants threatened to bring down all the inhabitants of the Land of Israel.
... At first, the local Arab population enjoyed cordial relations with Zionist leaders like Haim Weizmann ... Only when Arab leaders become fully aware of the political ambitions of the Zionist movement did their views come around to those of the pious Jews in taking a rejectionist stance talk | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome your help to create new content, but your recent additions (such as Dictatorstan) are considered nonsense. Please refrain from creating nonsense articles. If you want to test things out, edit the sandbox instead. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
I know the things you can find on wikipedia when your re shaping your user page | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Just consider the facial tissue and Kleenex articles. Kleenex is a brand of facial tissue, and a popular one, just like Kraft Dinner is a popular variety of mac & cheese. There's no reason that either Kleenex or Kraft Dinner should be merged into those respective articles nor should this article reflect any other brands of mac & cheese. — CIS (talk | stalk) | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
OMG WTF
Took MY NAME OUT, WTH??!?!?!? .... you guys suck. | [
"toxic",
"profane",
"insult"
] | [
1,
1,
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Edit request
Hi, I moved your edit request to Wikipedia talk:Files for upload (not really the right place for it either, but that's okay). Just wanted to let you know. Cheers, — | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Lestrade, you are pathetic, really... | [
"toxic",
"insult"
] | [
1,
0,
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
proposal that nobody at an/i seems to be getting
To stop all this shit from going out of hand, here's what to do:
protect this article again
interaction ban on Sports and Politics and Andromedean
if either violates interaction ban then block for 14 days.
.
Andromedean is not faultless in this, but Sports and Politics and her ""It's not my fault it's your fault"" attitude isn't helping anyone, so s&P;, please except that you have a portion of the blame, and stop denying your faults. you've done wrong and andromedean hasn't helped much by reacting for as long as he did, but s&P;, you're the catalyst, so stop the war, stop the drama, and someone please put at least a 3 month protection on this article and interaction ban on both users before i start sending Arceus after people. 199.101.61.190 " | [
"profane"
] | [
0,
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
| decline = Please read the instructions in the block message, especially those pertaining to your username. And if you have any direct connection with the company (as your current username suggests), please read Wikipedia's Conflict of Interest guidelines at WP:COI and explain what else you intend to do here if unblocked other than writing about this company. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
Well we are talking about this article. A person is much different from a professional sports organization. Can you agree on the names I listed? We have to agree on something. And what does the level heading matter? Why doesn't a level 3 heading need to be informative?++++ " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Don
News to me. I'll file it for future use, but I'll probably forget anyway because everyone uses shorthand on WP. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
Dear Salvio, why do you think,wikipedia is the only place I can contribute. People are using wikipedia to spread false information. People perhaps have also found ways to derive monetary benefits out of it. Exposing people who are using admin powers for monetary gains is good for wikipedia itself. Remember Esjay Scandal. If I don't get the chance to assert here, I will find some alternative ways. Thanks. No-Blast " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
A what?!?!?!
""Crowley is a vegetarian""
snort*
You gotta be kidding me.
" | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
wateva minga mc donalds worker
u r a fuckin paedofile
leave ant and dec alone
just cause ur not famous
u fuckin ugly bitch fuck ur hole family | [
"toxic",
"profane",
"insult",
"hate"
] | [
1,
1,
1,
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
You Zionist Jewbastard Khazar Turks just love filibusters that draw out this tragedy to no conclusion. That's right, only YOU are allowed a say on the issue. YOU have the right to editorialise anything to YOUR content, media mogul jackasses! Stay out of London, New York, Washington and Hollywood! Get the fuck out of America and stop dragging us into your stupid affairs with Muslims! You deserved 9/11 and I hope more of you die from suicide bombings by economically tortured Muslims, just keep it in the Middle East. Helen Clark did well to not take your shite! I swear, I'll fucking kill you all if I ever go to Israel. I'll take nukes signed by each and every Jew of the Manhattan Project and level you to nothing; in a eulogy to Theodore Herzl. What irony, to die by the products of your own hands, that had me fear for my life in the fucking Cold War. Mad scientists and loan sharks, fucking trash with no goddamn decency to Europe and America! Wanderer gypsies, no sense of love for your own people enough to stick together on your own land. Can't even settle down and do your own thing away from others. Leave us and Rachel Corrie alone! You have no respect for the dead! To you, she was just another Goy puppet! You will pay and I hope to personally see you die. Perhaps a Tay-Sachs bio-weapon to plague and infest the lot of you until death do we part. Take your Michael Medveds, Adam Sandlers and Bob Dylans and shove them up your arses! No more Disraelis and Kerrys or Rothschilds and Greenspans will ruin our lives! You bring disrepute to White males, by rewriting history; fucking up churches and schools in culture war. You killed McKinley and the Romanovs. Fuck your Sigmund Freud, Ron Jeremy and Ruth Westheimer pervert terrorists and kill yourselves NOW! You fucking Howard Stern/Jerry Seinfeld/Eugene Levy garbage are no better than any other Semite like the Muslims themselves! You anti-Semitic hypocrites have no feature but greed and barbarism! I read the massacre at Clifford's Tower | [
"toxic"
] | [
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
in York Castle and hope for another! Your ritual child abuse still mutilates baby genitals, just like labia removal. You are savages without civilisation and bloodsucking leeches holding onto hosts as all viruses do; so you are fake friends! No more Bugsy Siegel Hollowcau$e Industry and kosher racketeering! GENOCIDIST DAVID SLEW GOLIATH OF PALESTINE! REJECTED ONES, YOU HAVEN'T MONOPOLY ON SUFFERING! | [
"toxic"
] | [
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
":::I restored the simple clear version of the argument without the miss-leading phrases like ""pass-over"" and the miss-leading statement that implies some ballots are simply disregarded (rather than some rankings on some ballots, where the voter's first choice is still in the running, are not used, etc.) The phrasing proposed by Abd creates a false impression to most Wikipedia readers about the nature of this CON argument. Nobody is arguing that a candidate with a majority of first preferences is passed-over in favor of a weaker candidate, nor that some valid ballots are simply ignored...yet that is the impression that Abd's choice of words leaves with most readers. His summary of the issue does not capture the thrust of the main claim that exhausted ballots can lead to sub-50% winners, nor even the much rarer claim that candidates with much less core support, but broader secondary support, may get eliminated.
" | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
THE COLUMBINE SHOOTERS ARE MY HEROS
May they rest in peace | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
I think Ronnotel is using the blocking to ""punish"" my recent behave. That's not what the blocking policy is for: Blocks are used to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, not to punish users.
I certainly haven't made any disruptions to any articles on Wikipedia. The edit warring block was lifted. I think that an indef block for personal attacks it's not properly done. Maybe one week. I don't have a harassment history here. It's a zero! " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
It seems that many users have had problems with harassment and vandalism
, why do you continually harass other users and then falsly accuse them of ""vandalism"" or other wiki-infringements? Please, do not delete this comment, I am only here as a mediator and this is NOT a personal attack. Only a simple question as to what motivates you to defame other users." | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
I hate you dude! Go suck a chode! | [
"toxic",
"profane",
"insult"
] | [
1,
1,
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
. I've gone with the coordinates given at this page (which are a wee bit northeast of the ones you suggested), since that's an available source that can be used for verification. Thanks for pointing out the error. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
" July 2009 (UTC)
Did it ever occur to you that what you are doing is imaginary...there was no concept of a ""Grand Slam"" when Wimbledon started in 1877, or when the US Open started in 1881, or when the Australian Open started in 1905. It was not until the 1930s that the idea of the ""Grand Slam"" emerged. What you are doing is an ahistorical revision of the past. Ok, many persons do that...it's called ""hindsight."" Some have an issue with counting ""slams"" before the challenge round was abolished; others have a problem with pre-open era counts because they excluded professionals. As there is no consensus and Wikipedia calls for pluralism...the article reflecting multiple major points of view...it would not be too much to come up with a solution that would list ""most slams, Open era"" and ""most slams, pre-Open era."" So why is it too difficult for you to accept the idea of, at the very least, listing the pre-1925 French ""Open"" winners? All your excuses are cop-outs (too much work? others don't agree with you, so you want to mess up the board?). Maybe if you stepped back and asked why were others adding the ""greyed-out"" cases to the slam counts, you might find your answer.
When I open the Encyclopedia Britannica (a BRITISH reference), they list all the winners of the French ""Open"" back to 1891. When I open the World Almanac (an AMERICAN reference), they list Suzanne Lenglen as having won 11 titles. So, what makes you more authoritative than THOSE sources? Clearly, you have NOT edited in a spirit of compromise and have instead WP:OWNed these articles. But history is not on your side. By the way, I have a degree in history, what about you? 19:48, 5" | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
fuck off you monkey cock sucker | [
"toxic",
"profane",
"insult"
] | [
1,
1,
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
How primitive are you
Are you from a nursery school? Do you try to betray at tiptoety? Childish primitive attempts... Little nazi antonescu fan. | [
"toxic"
] | [
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
And thanks for fixing up my shoddy prose at Rocket League! I slapped it together rather quickly. ) · · " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Benjwong: Please look into the various news sources. The tainted milk had passed the protein test and Sanlu became aware of the melamine in early August, one week before the Olympics! It's more than reasonable for anyone who knows China to assume that they want to suppress the news at that time (and now we have sources). I've seen reports that Sanlu recalled their products by their own efforts (not publicity, not government) weeks ahead of the news breaking out. Today's news claims the last straw (in suppressing the news) was the NZ government directly talking to PRC government last week. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
The RfC I raised has been in place for almost 4 days now. I have been waiting for others to comment on whether this should be withdrawn. There has not been a single message or jot of support for your request for withdrawl. Therefore I will not withdraw the RfC.__ | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Indeed, the decision should be taken on grounds of notability (I've yet to be convinced the subject is notable). The creation of it as a rebuttal is clearly wrong, but there is no need to delete it on those grounds. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
Your comments on the ""Islam and blasphemy"" discussion page
Sir,
Your use of gross profanity on that page is offensive to other Wikipedia editors, as are your accusations that anything you perceive as negative towards Islam is ""racist"". You are obviously free to express your opinion on the content, but you should exercise civility towards others, especially if you expect the same for yourself.
You should editing your comments, or else removing them entirely.
" | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
Removing that section
I don't understand why this is so mysterious. I've explained, twice, why I'm doing it. Neither time you did you give me a response. If you can't be bothered to address my arguments, than I don't see why I have to stop removing that paragraph. Why should I stop just on your say-so?— " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
Re: Event
Am I the John Cena of Wikipedia? (Hit " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
ScienceApologist
I sincerely believe that ScienceAntagonist is a bigot, liar, and cheat. He is known to have hacked sites, spammed email addresses, and also to have been banned from science bulletin boards in his relentless pursuit of any ideas that challenge his own world view.
His ongoing and underhand attacks on Ian Tresman mark sad days in the history of wikipedia
Ian Tresman deserves a fair hearing
82.35.165.180 dvd@plasmacosmology.net | [
"insult"
] | [
0,
0,
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
Thanks Luna, I really appreciate it. You're the reason why Wikipedia has the most nicest and great communities on the internet. Happy editing! (Talk) " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
What are you talking about? There is a source!!!!! | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
I'm from Europe (the UK to be exact), which is in Region 2. It's not out here. I've said so many times that it's not out anywhere in the entire UK. I have tried looking up when it is released in Region 2, but I haven't found anything. Where does it say it was released on November 24? | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
Time to remove POV tag TAB
- TABOnly one editor () wants this tag, which he now bases solely on scare quotes around the term ""same-sex marriage"". He has been unable to convince any other editors that this change is necessary. In his own edit summary when adding the scare quotes he said ""In preparation to remove POV tag - see discussion page"" which indicates that this is the last issue that concerns him. Since his retaliatory and self-referential new section has been removed from the article, I see no reason to humour him by leaving the POV tag on any longer. TAB
- TAB#Support for removal of POV tag. " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
" November 2010 (UTC)
CS, if you give me (or one of my Talk Page Stalkers) permission, we can just copy some of the basic parts to your Archive subpage and your talk page, to get you going. Then you will just need to change the image. I have the search tool on my userpage because I don't know how to add it elsewhere I'm not that good at this stuff, set mine up by copying other people. (Talk) 13:07, 14" | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
This is the last time i am giving unblock request, as too much unblock request will make administrators revoke my talk page access. Emperor " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
User BadtoGod was trying to warn you about your vandalsious edits and you attacked him because of his sexuality. Shame on you | [
"toxic"
] | [
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
From an admin , we cant expect such reason, you removed Propdelition tag without seeing its tag or the notices concerning no citation or references which are intact for years. Now because of your this mistake the same Dubious articles will remain on Wikipedia. This is one of the biggest backdrop of wikipedia, admin who dont have expertise in any subject treat all editors as inferior make edits without even looking at its talk page or notices regarding citations . Now other editor will come and claim that prop deletion tag was removed go to Afd and it will go unnoticed their for months and such articles without any citations and some of them are on ""Personality who never existed"" will continue on Wikipedia. So its my due request that you must give it due attention that such articles are deleted when their time limit of Prop Deletion runs out. Now because you removed the Prop Del tag without any reason other Admin might claim that this is not non-controversial, so you must took notice of this and must act accordingly when their time limit runs out. As admin you are entrusted with responsibility but your recent removal of those tags dont show any maturity. Atleast you should have talked on its ""Discussion Page instead of acting like Big daddy , you yourself can see that citation tags are their for many years, so source or citation are not net to back these articles infact i doubt that any such personaility ever existed"". So hoepfully you will rectify your mistake. Thnx " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
We hear Mr. P and he narrow gauge engines are appearing. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Umm.... so you respond to censorship allegations by banning my ability to edit?
I don't think many people would argue that Hellmuth makes great TV and Raymer is fat. Not worth mentioning, perhaps, but certainly not 'nonsense.' I'm pretty sure I never said Raymer is fat. I like Raymer, and plus.... calling someone fat isn't really funny. That's not my style. But maybe I was drunk or something. I usually am. Anyways, thanks for taking this whole thing so seriously and providing me with a little comedic relief. It's good to know there are people like you watching out for us! The Phil Hellmuth Wikipedia page will be a more objective learning tool because of you!!! RHOBITE RULES!!!!! | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
Cheers, I wondered if you were doing it when I saw you make some edits. I'll see what I can do. " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
Some more choice words:
.
The arbitration case is Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Macedonia 2. To find out what our friend has been up to you can go to Special:Diff/694047903#A little ditty, click on the link to ""God bless you, Katie!"", and follow the links from there. 86.149.11.231 " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Wikipedia is not a governmental organization, so the First Amendment to the United States Constitution does not apply here. Also, please read WP:SOAP and WP:FORUM for a further explanation of why this is not the right place for you to be preaching. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Please add all new information for this section first to the subarticle Government policies and the subprime mortgage crisis. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Let me know on my talk page if you need admin help with any other similar pages. — Carl ( · talk) | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Thanks for pointing that out Camembert. I didn't really check the history all that way back. I just had a look at their site again, and found that our first version of Thomas Linacre is the same as theirs , and this was from the 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica, which they don't mention on their site, so it does look like they might be copying other things from us too. I've made a note of this at Wikipedia:Sites that use Wikipedia for content. 02:30, 30 Nov 2003 (UTC) | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Well, it appears we have reached an impasse; you're just confusing a lot of things, and since I don't usually edit the Mac area of Wikipedia, extending the discussion further is not on top of my priorities. As long as you don't try to schedule a birthday party with Reminders, you'll be fine. I'll leave the discussion and the article as is.
Best regards, | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Finally, using words like Gripe suggest some serious projection issues on your part and are also ad hominem. You still have not answered the basic POV issue why Christianity ALONE? | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
AfD nomination of The Catch (2008)
An article that you have been involved in editing, The Catch (2008), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Catch (2008). Thank you. Endless Dan | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
WillI entirely disagree with you. Political Research Associates is not the least bit analogous to a newspaper. But for argument's sake, if you prefer, you can read the sentence as ""the 1987 piece published by his employer, Political Research Associates, a highly partisan political organization,[] published originally to attempt to influence vote totals in a US presidential election."" " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Proposal: to split article into 3 new articles
The proposal is to split the article into Reading to Taunton Line, Exeter to Plymouth Line and Bristol to Exeter Line which would include a merger of Bristol to Taunton Line with the Taunton-Exeter sections in this article. The main advantages for this are;
1) The three articles would more accurately represent the history of the lines in question. This article includes the Berks and Hants Railway as well as only a small section of the Bristol to Exeter Railway and the South Devon Railway. Three articles concerning the modern day equivalents of these railways would be a better basis for the articles than the arbitrary cut-offs that are currently employed.
2)The three articles would more accurately tie-in with other articles. For example, the article Disused railway stations (Bristol to Exeter Line) would cover all closed stations from a single article instead of the one and a quarter that it currently does.
3)The articles will more accurately mirror current services, this especially applies to CrossCountry services that only operate between Bristol and Plymouth and South West Trains that only operate between Exeter and Plymouth.
Please add your support or criticisms for the proposal. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"\
""Personal attacks get you nowhere"" says the guy who tell me ""go fuck yourself"" in an edit line and gets scolded by a much more reasonable Wikpedian for it. Right. Free tip: don't hit people with a three revert rule template either when you're the one breaking that rule in the first place, especially when I've since added reputable sources relative to the claim. 74.56.51.128 " | [
"toxic",
"profane"
] | [
1,
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Message for Angie
Yo need to get a makeover, u r fuckin ugly bitch.
122.106.27.175 | [
"toxic",
"profane",
"insult"
] | [
1,
1,
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Hey! These are not my edits man! I really didn't did this.. This is the first time I saw this.. The edits that I had done is on 's talk page only! And I did tried to edit in good faith.. For example, I edited Robert Kwok's biography, Stingray, Roti Canai too... Please.. I really did not edit the others that you had accused me... I am deeply sorry..... '( ™№1185©® | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
Merge proposal
I am proposing merging the character articles here as a list. The articles themselves do not seem to possess any particular notability for the characters (it's not inherited from the main article) and consist solely of descriptions of the plot, which sometime overlap. There is nothing to give an ""out of universe"" view for any of these characters and a quick google search didn't seem to bring anything to light either. " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
Problem in Deterrence Section
The sentence that begins ""Naci Mocan, an economist at Louisiana State University,..."" appears to be incomplete, and ends with the end of an unintroduced quotation from someone named Shepard. " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
The dumbest things on wikipedia are the people who contribute regularly | [
"toxic"
] | [
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Response: I merely made a sarcastic comment to highlight the triviality of the passage. Come on, so what if Snoop Dogg wore a Texas A&M; shirt in a video? Is that really worth mentioning in Wikipedia? | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
It is immaterial when you signed up under this name. You are using to evade your block as 08:59 | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Actually this map was taken from the CIA fact book and shows the Golan as neither Syrian nor Israeli. This conclusively demonstrates that the current depiction, placing the Golan in Syria, is pure POV in the extreme | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
John Dobson's death
Hi, I grew up with John's son and it was announced on on social media so that is how I know he died. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Indeed I believe it should be mentioned for every separatist group that is listed. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"::::: This is fanaticism. I suppose that next you will want to ""fix"" references to ""Christianity"" to point to ""Jesusism"". — 20:23, 21 Jul 2004 (UTC)
" | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Read This Chimp/Chump - Whatever
Read the following first.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Please_do_not_bite_the_newcomers
Then stop biting me and my page. Show that you have at least the simplest modicum of respect for the territory and the preferences of others. Thus far you have simply shown that you are rude, immature, and not too subtle when it comes to communication. Then read my personal pages again and show some respect for me and my wishes. Such things take great precedent over all else, IMHO, which you ought to respect as well. 20:24, 17 September 2006 | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
" 2006 (UTC)
then the ""name withdrawn by request"" is not only unencylcopedic but it's blatantly untrue - wikipedians didn't remove his name by request, it was never there in the first place. I was rather suprised to have seen this after Wikipedia's problem in germany: but now it makes sense (it's disinformation) 14:23, 28 February" | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
Acceptance of reposted article
I see that you accepted a draft article on Jason Binn. When you did so, presumably you were aware that an article by the same title had previously been deleted as a result of an AfD discussion. (If you weren't, then I suggest in future you should check for any deletion log for any article before you create it.) Even without any previous deletion history, I would have found your acceptance of the draft open to question, as it was distinctly promotional in tone, and its sourcing was largely to sources which were not independent (e.g. his own magazine, a press release, etc) or did not give substantial coverage of him. However, in light of the previous AfD deletion, you should have been particularly cautious about accepting the draft. The editor who uses the pseudonym """" " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
Very telling
""When you say that I ""refuse to listen to what people are saying"", its because I have heard this repeatedly from many editors, but frankly when it comes to POV pushing it just goes out the other ear."" - that quote tells me that what I've long suspected is completely true. ""Discussions"" with certain editors are completely pointless. ) Since anything which does not agree with his POV is ""pushing someone else's POV"" it is irrelevant, and will be ignored. What some people fail to realize is that on Wikipedia, consensus is all-important, moreso than any guideline or even policy, and even more important than ""being right"". If a dozen or so editors disagree with you and you alone, then the problem lies with you and not them. If a problem exists, then you seek mediation rather than fight with everyone else. " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Also, STOP PERSONAL ATTACKS. You have a lot to learn how to use Wiki. EOT, again. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
":It's nice that you completely ignored the main thing whereas cherry-picking ""incidental"" words as you like. This is completely unacceptable and I feel somewhat threatened and ridiculed.
" | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
Because Tawkerbot2 doesn't have a bot flag, so that people will know to check what's going on, especially on Recent Changes, where bot edits don't usually show up. correct me if I'm wrong (talk) " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Or maybe after Ward's been driven off it's my turn? | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
Non-Admins List
I've taken my name off that list to avoid an edit war with you or someone else. I don't feel like bickering, but i'm not going to accept any description such as that one or the former one as accurate. Please don't put my name back there unless you wish to edit war with me, which I hope we can avoid. afist '''''' " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Homosexual marriage is totally gay
Well it is! 12.204.164.179 | [
"toxic"
] | [
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |