Datasets:

Intuit-GenSRF

/

combined_toxicity_profanity_v2_train_eval

like 2

Follow

Intuit-GenSRF 7

Wrestling with a pig Well, you know what they say about wrestling with a pig. Here it seems WP is the pig, and the users like are the piglets. Whoooh baby do they love it! Can't believe I was suckered in and made to splash about with the Grumpus and his Friends. Trolls of a stye stick together and stink alike. Since some people are so cowardly they must hide behind the skirts of their friends and the administrators, I guess I will have to address him as if he is really here, which I am sure he is as he can't stand to not know what is being said about him, be it good or bad.

You pathetic small town fucktard. You have no idea how foolish you look.

Taylor Swift's American Girl I understand the song did not chart. But should this information be available somewhere in her discography? For future reference of her covering it, if for nothing else. Just wondering! Thanks!

Leifern, feel free to edit the headings. Please explicitly somehow mention they have nothing to do with Dhimmi in the senses you mean.

I look like an idiot because I just burst out laughing. Damn you, Mike.

Im quite sure its Nih-Kee-Ah

Birth name and year Glyph56 has (at least) twice, deleted his birth name (Crier) from the lead paragraph, and changed his birth year from 1961 to 1956. I am restoring the old version based on the following links: , , [htt://www.aceshowbiz.com/celebrity/keith_sweat/], , . I did find a page with the 1956 date, but it is suspiciously close in phrasing to this article: .

REDIRECT Talk:Woodhaven, Queens/Archive 1

Why is there an NPOV tag on this article? Could the person who added it please note their specific objections so that we may sort out any issues? I will leave this for 24 hours, then remove the tag if nothing is said. -

, 5 October 2012 (UTC) I first sent you message, then after that created a section regarding my edit in the Talk page and deleted the content once again, after which I continued to receive warnings and reinstatements of the removed content, at which point I decided to escalate the conversation to the specific user's Talk page. If there is any issue related to the timestamp of the section I created in the article's talk page, I edited the post with the signature button at a later time because I had forgotten to when I initially created the section. I wasn't intending to create any edit-wars and my direct assertion to another user was only because my edit and talk-page section were being overlooked. 71.94.7.228 23:57

" speaking of bad faith... Reverting edits made in good faith immediately after they are made is irritating and hostile to collaboration. Especially when you obviously don't take the time to consider their reasons. Please explain to me why this quote: ""The Executive Branch shall construe [the torture ban] in a manner consistent with the constitutional authority of the President to supervise the unitary Executive Branch and as Commander in Chief and consistent with the constitutional limitations on the judicial power."" Needs to be included in addition to (and immediately following) this quote: The executive branch shall construe Title X in Division A of the Act, relating to detainees, in a manner consistent with the constitutional authority of the President to supervise the unitary executive branch and as Commander in Chief and consistent with the constitutional limitations on the judicial power, which will assist in achieving the shared objective of the Congress and the President, evidenced in Title X, of protecting the American people from further terrorist attacks. Further, in light of the principles enunciated by the Supreme Court of the United States in 2001 in Alexander v. Sandoval, and noting that the text and structure of Title X do not create a private right of action to enforce Title X, the executive branch shall construe Title X not to create a private right of action. Finally, given the decision of the Congress reflected in subsections 1005(e) and 1005(h) that the amendments made to section 2241 of title 28, United States Code, shall apply to past, present, and future actions, including applications for writs of habeas corpus, described in that section, and noting that section 1005 does not confer any constitutional right upon an alien detained abroad as an enemy combatant, the executive branch shall construe section 1005 to preclude the Federal courts from exercising subject matter jurisdiction over any existing or future action, including applications for writs of habeas corpus, described in section 1005. Is that sneaky little insertion of [torture ban] supposed to be the added value? "

GOCE 2011 Year-End Report Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on

Please do not add commercial links — or links to your own private websites — to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. See the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks.

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Free Republic Hello, An Arbitration case in which you commented has been opened: Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Free Republic. Please add any evidence you may wish the arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Free Republic/Evidence. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Free Republic/Workshop. On behalf of the Arbitration Committee,

Fair use images I did quite a trim; use of images like this could only be justified on the articles on the recordings, or here if there was some evidence that the images themselves were noteworthy, as opposed to the recordings they accompanied. I'd be sympathetic to either approach, but prior to my edits it looked a little like a fair use gallery, which is specifically deprecated. Sorry.

This argument is going on simultaneously at a number of articles about members of the Thai royal family. The priciple involved is that Thais (all 40 million of them) find the use of unadorned personal names for members of the royal family very offensive, and I and other users with some knowledge of Thailand (I am there now) believe that Wikipedia should take this into account. We don't do this for other royals by the way - do we have an article for Elizabeth Windsor? This article should revert to Prince Tipangkorn Rasmichoti.

" Public policy/ education resources In the public policy, education, and relations section I had included links to sources of public information web sites about hydraulic fracturing. Initially I had included one from an environmental group, but decided to limit the sources to news and government sources. Beagel moved them back to the EL, buried under the reference section, and I reverted this. I put them back because they are relevant to that section, and will make the information more accessible. This isn't forbidden under WP:EL, just not normally done. In this case it seems to make sense to have the sites linked since this is source-quality material. WP:EL reads ""Wikipedia articles may include links to web pages outside Wikipedia (external links), but they should not normally be used in the body of an article. All external links must conform to certain formatting restrictions. Some acceptable links include those that contain further research that is accurate and on-topic, information that could not be added to the article for reasons such as copyright or amount of detail, or other meaningful, relevant content that is not suitable for inclusion in an article for reasons unrelated to its accuracy."" They are relevant to this section's content. "

" bird task template I unlinked the articles you linked there. I was working on the Corcoracidae, but after I moved it I could not find which articles linked to it because every single talk page the template is in was shown in the what links here page! talk "

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Silkroad Online, you will be blocked from editing. If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

I wish I had the skill to take a picture of a fictional character. I'd be rich. No, that's the real Roderick Brookes on whom the character is based. The image is so small because it went into a wrestler format article, it was resized to fit with the typical size image. Also, I inadvertently uploaded it twice.

" April 2006 (UTC) The American people did know through their elected representative. Are you arguing that the Government should have no classified information? No Spies? When Congress learned about the leak they wanted to know who leaked it, not the details of the program because they already knew. She is not a ""whistleblower."" We have ""whistleblower"" laws that recognize what is whistleblowing and what is felony crime of disclosing classified information. If she wanted to just ""whistleblow"", she could have contacted her Democrat congressperson and arranged a classified briefing. She used to be Special Assistant to Clinton so she should have known how to do this. Instead she chose to ""leak"" it in an illegal way. With all the options she had available, she chose the one that would cause the most political damage to the administration. One has to wonder why. 00:58, 24"

Agreed. However may be better to remove it into similar quality article – Denial of the Holodomor – together with Elimination of Ukrainian cultural elite section – which information has no relation to Holodomor itself. Can we limit the article to causes and Holodomor itself?

" User pages Hello, and welcome. Comments for users belong on ""talk"" pages. You can find this page by clicking the ""discussion"" tab while viewing the user page. Feel free to ask me if you have any questions. — দ 07:34, August 15, 2005 (UTC)"

mother fucker fuck off dick face

" Note that this was not disruption but was a genuine vote. A separate account was created for this, as the proposer seemed to have done the same. It was a little joke, you see. "

" Regarding HeartBreaker, The Original Tribute to Pat Benatar, please forgive me for not fully understanding what makes this listed for deletion. Perhaps it's just a guiedlines issue? But, what speciffically makes any of the other tribute bands listed on the tribute act page any more notable than HeartBreaker to allow those pages inclusion? Is it the formatting? Unfortunately, I am new to the Wikipedia environment regarding editing and possibly need some direction on this? I came across the tribute acts pages and noticed The Iron Maidens, which is a local group with not as long a tenure in the tribute community as HeartBreaker, although definately notable, and they are incuded. But beyond The Iron Maidens are bands whos accomplishments pale in comparison to HeartBreaker. HeartBreaker IS a notable, respected and an acknowledged band of the tribute community as well as being one of the first of local tribute acts to appear in the L.A. area when the tribute phenomenon began during the late 90s, particularily with a female lead singer. That, in itself makes HeartBreaker a pioneer to the community. What other information or details do you suggest including, other that what is listed in the biography which is certainly not insignificant, in order to make this page more or as ""notable"" than or as any of the other other listed tribute bands by Wikipedia standards, and to gain inclusion? Please advise. I have perused some of the other acts' pages linked to the tribute acts page and see only a few with significant notability, most have even fewer accomplishments and notariety than HeartBreaker, some I've never even heard of and certainly aren't known to our local tribute community, which definately expands beyond just the L.A. area. HeartBreaker has been written about and featured in reliable sources and is known for it's tenure, quality and respected within our tribute community, particularily since we are one of the longest running tributes AND are acknowledged BY the artist to whom we pay tribute, Pat Benatar and members of her band(s). We are the only band of any kind listed in her official web pages and have been joined by significant

original members of her band. This in itself lends support to the tribute act pages. The histoy of the tribute act pages specifically points to acts who are joined to play with the artists to whom they tribute and further goes on the list bands on the page. Why is it not acceptable to list HeartBreaker and a biography of information to support the tribute act pages? We may not have as much notariety as The Iron Maidens but we certainly are not insignificant and definately are more notable that some of the listed bands. HeartBreaker was featured in a televised documentary about tribute bands on a major network and has been written about and listed is major publications. How can any of this not be notable when this is in regard to tribute bands?????? Please explain. Thank you."

Actually, I haven't stated my own personal opinion on either author's credibility, I don't believe. I'm saying Bailey has few, if any, better objective claims to credibilty than does Monica. And Kwork's behavior is not too interesting to me, but I will say I that both sides of the debate are flinging bad-faith and offensive accusations with abandon, and that that fact alone is causing over 90% of the problems here.

Accuracy== Can anyone comment on the accuracy of this movie in depicting the Maya as heavily involved in human sacrifice which was esp used by the Aztecs, not the Maya. If error, that would be typical Gibson gibberish and blurring histoyr as he did e.g. in Braveheart depicting all normal, country side Scots as hugely filthy and starving (all inaccurate) and in Passion, blurring history again to depict huge flaying of Christ's skin on and on, which has no known documentation (except surely he WAS beaten severely , just not mostly entirely deflayed of his skin which would hae killed hiim before the cross) ... all Gibson gibberish , intened to use massively sadism to make a buck. Art or SM Porn Is it ART for a monkey to make movies to appeal to the public's fascination with sadism and gruesome tortures (as Wm Wallace's being\ hung drawn and quarted in Braveheart)? ==

I know you wikiterrorists love to limit free speech but you have to admit that IP banning is foolish, if that is your best option then you are a fool. Keep being an asshole Duran, it is your only talent

Fuck you too Thanks for blocking me... but you didn't do good enough...

Something Helpful Here is John F.Kennedy's speech on Secret Societies and the Military Industrial Complex That They Conrol http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VvQ2FUwvcqw

" O no no no. It happened by fluke. I was just trying a combination and the statement showed up. It's never easy to extract information from Snippets. The reason being they do not give the full context. Should be used only when you are 100% sure of the fact. Example was the statistics of Goan Catholics in Bombay. Approximations not allowed. TC "

Image copyright problem with Image:Havencoverissue1 001.jpg Thanks for uploading Image:Havencoverissue1 001.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy). The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}. Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Image legality questions page. Thank you.

" Yet my last sentence in my foregoing post is perfectly veridical. Even now Jeffro77 (and you) are unaware of the illiterate nature of his edit even though I reproduced it for him (from the ""Existence of God"" Talk page): ""The Deutsch citation is entirely correct, and the quoted text is available at the linked article in the citation. Failing to use the exact citation supplied by you is immaterial."" But as anyone who is literate can see, his citation is incorrect: ""Chapter 14: ""The Ends of the Universe,"" with additional comments by Frank J. Tipler; also available here"". ""Chapter 14"" of what book? By whom? Nor did I ever call anyone at Wikipedia a bully. That's a false claim by you. You therein protest too much (cf. Hamlet, Act III, Scene II, line 240). As well, I don't merely make charges, I prove what I state. Jeffro77 and Ilkali both repeatedly made false claims regarding the subject for which there is no excuse due to the information being readily at hand within either the subsection under question itself or in the hyperlinked Wikipedia articles. Neither of them knew the slightest thing about the Omega Point Theory other than that they knew that its author maintains that it physically proves God's existence, which was all it took to rile them up. While lacking knowledge about a subject is not itself an error, what is completely uncalled for is to have vociferous opinions on an issue while remaining in that state of ignorance. That's the current state of this matter. Those who have repeatedly shown a willingness to make factually false statements on the matter, and whose ignorance regarding the subject is nearly complete, now have their illiterate and clownishly censorial, and indeed illogical, edit showing. Regarding the illogic of the edit, Jeffro77's excuse in his edit summary doesn't even make sense, as it doesn't explain why he deleted mention of Prof. Deutsch's endorsement of the physics of the Omega Point Theory, particularly since Jeffro77 himself called Deutsch an ""eminent physicist"

" in his own edit (i.e., that statement wasn't there before): of which argues against the notion that Jeffro77 considers the physics of the Omega Point Theory as fringe. Further, Jeffro77 deleted mention of the fact that Prof. Wolfhart Pannenberg, who is one of the leading theologians in the world, has defended the theology of the Omega Point Theory and Tipler's position that the Omega Point is consistent with the Judeo-Christian God. So by Jeffro77's own words, he must consider Deutsch's endorsement of the physics of the Omega Point Theory to be noteworthy, and yet he deleted mention of this endoresement in an area where Jeffro77 himself agrees that Deutsch is eminently qualified and replaced it with a large displayed quotation regarding a matter that Deutsch has no qualification or erudition in, even though the previous version already clearly mentioned that Deutsch disagrees that Omega Point is God. Moreover, in this edit Jeffro77 deletes all mention of the fact that an actual trained theologian, Prof. Wolfhart Pannenberg, who is one of the world's leading theologians, has defended the theology of the Omega Point Theory. Jeffro77's edit is so ridiculously biased and illogical that it's a sick joke.74.4.222.208 "

":::::::Feel free to suggest as you please. You don't need my permission. Just don't expect anyone to take your suggestions (nor your grandstanding and soapboxing) seriously given your sock puppet history. I'll leave the humour to you too, hit-and-miss though you tend to be. I'm more interested in knowledge and fact. For example, facts such as ""who was the former One Nation branch president for Canberra (1999)?"". '''''' [ contribs ] "

February 2009 Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Since you're the one who is making a huge change to the article, and you have been reverted by several users now, maybe you're the one who should consider explaining your edits. (And the place to do it is on the article's talk page, not here.) I will say you are likely to keep getting reverted if you continue to replace information that has a good variety of reliable sources with information sourced to a wordpress blog. Self-published sources like blogs are not considered reliable. And even if you had provided a reliable source, you didn't explain why you deleted so much other sourced material. I suggest you open up a discussion on the article's talk page if you have suggestions for improving the article. Cheers,

sorry wiki people, didn't know about vandalism

Do you like weiner products? I like sausage. Its saltiness delights my tongue.

" Okay feel free.  · talk "

Tense issues This article had numerous tense contradictions before I changed the article to reflect the more appropriate past tense, this was done because I saw no mention of a comeback series and the last show was broadcast in 2004.

Result: Fake editors having a fake discussion about a fake article.

There has been some work along these lines, showing that provably recursive functions of various theories are exactly those in some hierarchy up to the proof-theoretic ordinal of the theory. For example, the paper Fairtlough, Matt; Wainer, Stanley S. Hierarchies of provably recursive functions. Handbook of proof theory, 149207,Stud. Logic Found. Math., 137, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1998 briefly discusses the case of Peano arithmetic with transfinite induction added, but I would guess people have by now got as far as the constructive ordinals you mention. My impression is that you should in principle be able to get up to any given constructive ordinal, but there is no honest way to get all the way to the Church-Kleene ordinal.

Extreme Hysterics by Wiki Editors This is an attempt to combat extreme nut job, crazy level remarks by wiki editors who seem not only finnicky but exactly, entirely crazy , as I mean , clarifying if needed, they are lunatics as e.g. I will simply edit to correct a TYPO and one of these nut jobs, see above will hysterically, shout as loud as possible that I vandalized a wiki article by correcting a typo AND threaten to ban me ... This has been in fact routinely esp done by entirely crazy, lunatic Doug Weller over and over now for approx 18 months by this person who should be in an insane asylum esp for his stalking me about wikpedia for that time, with such entirely uncalled for and entirely psychotic hysterical attacks. This all origniated FROM a single, passing meaningless comment about his addition to an article on standing stones, a subject he knows quit a bit about, when i in effect said he had made a dumb remark... an innocent and in that case accurate remark but MINOR criticism, ... now 18 months later, this extreme insane lunatic has harrassed me all that time and brought in pals who are as extreme crazy as he is to harrass and further esp stalk me and my family ... GET A LIFE nut jobs ... !!! but for Weller your harrassing and threatening and esp stalking including my children and family means this... you are soon out of the picture.... and how any such lunatic could claim to be a Yalie, Eli Yale , means yep you were once smart but morphed into such a lunatic (see above and all your endless threats v. me and harrassment of my family that you have ZERO judgment JUST AS a lunatic would not have any judgment AND TO JIMBO WALES that Wikipedia.org does not cull out and entirely ban such psychotic persons who demean, attack and harrass and stalk normal wiki users, is a serious wiki fault that causes not 100s but 1000s of worthwhile contributors to stop using wikipedia.org /z/ Frank Cadilac 12th ~~

Get posterized They see me Wiki They hatin Tryna catch me writing dirty I'm back Mlau0406 Mlau040655 And now mlau7464 Think you can stop me

" Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s): reason Request handled by: "

I think we may need to organize the archives a little differently for this topic. It's going to take some effort but it might be best to organize them by topic. This way we can refer new people to a comprehensive list of all discussions on a given topic and hope they care enough to actually read past discussion. It should be clear who's reding and who's not within a few responses and we can seperate the wheat from the chaff. padillaH (review me)(help me)

" Goodbye. (talk) I'm sorry to hear that. This is most unfortunate. Thank God for sockpuppets. Barnstars The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar I love you. The Barnstar of Good Humor I thought that your AIDS joke was really funny. User:MONGO The Surreal Barnstar Shine on you crazy diamond! I will miss you. User:Jimbo Wales The Resilient Barnstar I award this barnstar to myself for persevering through an obscene amount of . "

Omura's whale images Hi. The Omura's whale page is currently devoid of any images. I know only of copyrighted images of the type specimen, the first paratype, and a few from off northwestern Australia (assuming they are indeed Omura's, which they appear to be) and Komodo National Park. You wouldn't happen to know of any free images online?

STOP HARASSING ME, MOTHERFUCKER!

" You are free to make a redirect from Parthenon...->Elgin Marbles, but the common name is ""Elgin Marbles"" so that is the correct title for this artcle "

If you've even done a minimum of research, you'll see that my IP http://www.ip2location.com/24.37.221.6 points to an ISP named Videotron. It is not an Open Proxy... it's an ISP for the province of Quebec. http://www.videotron.com/service/index-en.jsp 24.37.221.6

According to most sources, the name of the city is Tighina.

The Ting Tings Leeds University claim is true!!!!87.36.25.39

You talk page makes it clear you are an aboriginal activist. In this light, it becomes clear why you are happy with the article as it is. This is why I have asked for previously unengaged editors to review the article, because of POV-pushing by a group of editors with similar political views.

This is worth a comment at the Good article reassessment of this article, as it is a GA criterion. Geometry guy

Looks like a good start.

"I changed this to ""ostensibly"", what do people think? T "

whatever my poats sais is true. GET IT. i decide which things are true in life, therefore anything i post is accurate by definition. GET IT?

What, you think this block will work better than your last one? God, but you are stupid!

Improving the Egyptian article I added it to the Arab world project, it needs to be fixed so we can clearly mention the non Arab minority in Egypt (the Copts) and the Arabized and Ethnic Arab muslims. The article is a mess now, plenty of Afrocentric and Anti-Arab trolling.

No History section? History of the Earth would be a much needed addition. ''''

" Also, the wording of the description of the comparison is quite heavy-handed. It claims that there were ""only winners"" in these economic reforms. That seems pretty biased. "

REDIRECT Talk:Final Round - World War II miniatures wargame

Other Hi! This may not be the best place to ask this and I dont know how often you check this, but, I am a little confused as to what the grammar homework for Spanish 302 is for tommorow night. I know that the 'breve ensayo' is about the passage on page 209 ('Se Reabre en Francia el debate sobre la Eutanasia') but didn't quite catch what he said about the grammar, do you think you could fill me in?

" S'alright - that makes sense - didn't know that about the way twinkle works. It's been a busy morning for this article - speedy notice, notice removed, prodded, deprodded, three different editors adding references and nominated for a collaboration project - and it's only existed 65 minutes! ...wha? "

- Jim McG 1951. Feb. 7 2013. I have identified several phrases and sentences that may be either paraphrases or copies. One has already been edited out. I highlighted three others with bold and italics and have asked my coconspirators to fix the parts they created and to find others in need of repair. Also am looking at help pages for things like patrolling and categorization. Nevertheless, any specific help from patrollers or reviewers - which specific parts need to be fixed - I would appreciate.

Oh dear, no. You've missed the point which is that we also have a policy that people should not be the ones to write their own biographies. You can surely correct factual errors in your own biography, but you shouldn't be the one to have started it. And no, most articles about living people are not written by the subjects.

Yes, the subdivision of the issues data works well. Great article.

" coal future You added ""(At 5% growth per annum compound this means the resource runs out in year +45, 2051.) "" to the article. Do you realise how ridiculous it is ? That implies that in 45 years time we'll be using 9 times as much coal as we do now. Does that seem likely to you? "

OK - this dog has been given a bad name: undeserbedly. Nevertheless, this poxy enterprise isn't worth being insulted and denegrated by barely literate tossers: I'm off! Thanks to those who followed WP:AGF and a heartfelt raspberry to Mr Darcy and chums!

Age of consent page move discussion Not sure you're still watching this article, but you may want to lend your thoughts to this discussion: Talk:Age of consent#Page move. And keep an eye on it if not already. 89.149.195.167

" dpkg Authorship Summary The discussion is about the authorship of dpkg. dpkg as it stands is a C program with well over 100 contributors. The anonymous user at 86.176.68.157 claims that the transition from its Perl predecessor to a C program (which was done by the subject of this article) was merely ""porting"" from one language to another, analogous to translating a novel. I’m not aware of any reference having been provided for this view. The other view is that the C version was a substantially new program with a much greater feature set. This view is supported by dpkg's own AUTHORS file, which lists the subject of this article as its original author, and describes it as ""based on"" the Perl version - not merely translated or ported from it. Discussion "

"==Number of Adepts == Because Spiritist Moviment doesn't proselytizes and is not a religious denomination (as states in the article), there is no current estimation for the number of Spiritists in Brazil. The IBGE estimation came from the census on religion, but many Spiritists do not consider themselves Spiritism ""followers"", because it is not a religion. Another poll made by a established poll research institution in Brazil shows that half of Brazilian population believes in reincarnation. Once Buddhism and Hinduism are almost non-existent in Brazil, it shows the strong influence of The Spiritist Doctrine and other native believes in Brazil. Moreover, in another poll (Rede Globo Mineira, 2000) in the populous State of Minas Gerais, Chico Xavier, the most popular spiritist medium in Brazil, was elected the Mineiro (Minas's citizen) of the century, competing against other popular celebrities like the former President Juscelino Kubischeck and inventor Santos Dumont. Recently Epoca Magazine comments an statistic of 20 to 30 millions of spiritists in Brazil. For the reasons above I'm removing the badly grounded statistics about the number of spiritists in Brazil. "

Hmm ... I hadn't seen that page before. Cute.

with your review pretty much the backbone of the whole page

That's being motivator hungry and needs no dignity wit a response.

Erhzerzog Franz Ferdiannd FAC I've nominated EFF for another FAC, and as you commented last time, I would like you to look her over again. Thanks!

" For the chop: Primordial Orion At the moment, this appears to be WP:OR, since no one is sourced as originating the idea that Enkidu and Orion are somehow linked. Does the idea come from a reliable scholarly source? If not, the whole section just has to go. "

Agree, per reasoning above. These heading change games are on the same level as the cat wars - totally useless and time wasting. (discuss)

He is Dickasshole Shut the Fuck up!! And Leave My Edit Wiki Alone Now!!

" {| style=""background-color: #F5FFFA; padding: 0;"" cellpadding=""0"" |- | style=""border: 1px solid #084080; background-color: #F5FFFA; vertical-align: top; color: #000;""| Hello, Chinakathysong0425, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! {| width=""100%"" style=""background-color:#F5FFFA;"" |style=""width: 55%; border:1px solid #FFFFFF; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top""| Getting started A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: Edit a page • Upload and use images • Create your first article Intuitive guide to Wikipedia • Article Creation Wizard Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Help desk: A Wiki Styled page to ask questions on Help directory: A comprehensive list-style help contents page Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • List of guidelines Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability |class=""MainPageBG"" style=""width: 55%; border:1px solid #FFFFFF; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top""| {| width=""100%"" cellpadding=""0"" cellspacing=""5

"" style=""vertical-align:top; background-color:#F5FFFA"" !

Please stop. If you continue to blank out (or delete portions of) page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cartoon Network After Dark, you will be blocked from editing. → (talk • contribs) —

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Meditation Leaders :Category:Meditation Leaders, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you.

Materialscientist: Nope, you are wrong. Try again.

That is because most iPod owners do not know about other Portable Music Players. The Transcend Tsonic is more popular than the iPod in many places.

I re-wrote 2 of your AfDs because you were asking for numbered asteroid deletions when NASTRO makes it clear you should be asking for a re-directs when dealing with asteroids. As soon as you complained, I quit. Is is now you writing character assassinations of me. I will write it off to semantics. But supporters asking for a numbered asteroid to be deleted are not complying WP:NASTRO / WP:DWMP.

Undesirable? me? I'm Don Juan, Cassanova & Groucho Marx rolled into one. I'm also very modest.

Shushi Massacres This page was created by a banned sock User:Hu1lee of User:Azizbekov, who vandalized over a dozen Wiki pages, including several user pages, yesterday before his ban. The page qualifies for the [ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Speedy_deletions#General_criteria speedy deletion criteria]. While

Please get AIDS Seriously get something terminal so you will finally get an opportunity to realise what a pathetic life you have. Your complete inability to be constructive is enough to warrant my bile. I hate you so much and feel sad too that something like you can make feel this way. A true honor. 82.132.226.149

" Dingley. Just to put you in the picture, Trident13: the tone is nothing unusual for Dingley. He's got a long history. Being sarcastic/patronizing/abusive/contemptuous makes him feel good. He does it a lot. Funny thing is though, when he decides he's a victim of it he runs, crying like a toddler who's just dropped his ice-cream, to the ""notice board"", demanding people be banned. He's always telling others how to behave, but he doesn't think the rules apply to him. Self-esteem problems. He won't read WP:AGF, of course, because, as you've probably noticed, he already knows everything. Take no notice of the sad fucker."

That Rickroll could of been way better...

JESUS look at the teeth on Country Girl. That's just awful.

", 18 October 2012 (UTC) We don't really have a ""too many of X"" argument for any Main Page content. The only semi-similar thing is the way that TFA nominations are penalised if a similar article has run within a particular period, but that approach doesn't map over onto DYK, which has no points system and a vastly higher throughput of articles daily. DYK's approach is and always has been that if content meets the requirements, it gets accepted. Also, it's not as if a surplus of articles in a particular topic area are holding up other articles appearing in DYK. As I said, it has a fairly high throughput in any case and even a large number of articles on a single topic - I mentioned 300 Indonesia articles in the course of a year - gets lost in the total number of articles that appear in the slot. 20:39"

Music Box You're right, other Wiki pages can't be used as references.

But is it in itself notable? If its notable to a few people then it isn't worthy; is the company notable? Does the Producer company have its own article? If it doesn't then I really don't see your article happening.

UJSARIO - Dakhla refugee camp section blog