text
stringlengths 0
4.54k
| labels
sequence | encoded_labels
sequence |
|---|---|---|
WWE Championship
Your edit to the WWE Championship article has been reversed as it constitutes vandalism. Please don't add nonsense to the articles. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
I reverted your edit because I have been informed differently, if this is not just your opinion then show me the rule. If you revert again we will need to take seek conciliation. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Where did I attack anyone? By the way, you have breached WP:INVOLVED, so you need to remedy this forthwith.If you believe that no one can be uncivil, you need to discuss that with the following users: Beeblebrox, Nev1, and Iridescent. You are hereby banned from my talk page. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Planning to make comback for Quagga
Well it's probably not hard to believe but they're planning to bring back the quagga through cloning. Some DNA samples that were left over in some hair samples of dead quaggas from the few musuems that have some stuffed ones. My professor is really into these reintroduction programs of extinct animals so he told me about it of coarse they won't tell the public about this out loud. What do ya'll think? mcelite | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
I have received a long string of threatening, stalking messages from Keri. I instructed this person to never contact me again. Instead they have engaged in a pattern of harassment against me. Next I will be filing a restraining order with the court. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Yes, now I see that it is correct. I played with MACD in Excel, and it's obvious that at constant trend, MACD constant is not zero, but is defined by the trend slope. Thanks for explanation. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Check the word 'rant' in the OED. It is duly noted that quite a lot of people just trip over and through the infinite web, to warp in and stumble onto this page, and are shocked by the same 'rant' from one Nishidani, and raise the same cries of alarm, all in delicious anonymity. The aleatory visit, the anonymous outcry of moral offense - it has become a formulaic mode, what the great Curtius called a 'topos'. But I don't think it will make the manuals of rhetorical gambits. None edit. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
":We have Emperor Meiji and not ""Mutsuhito"" or ""Mutsuhito of Japan"". Likewise, we have Emperor Taishō and not ""Yoshihito of Japan"", and similar for all of the 100+ other deceased emperors of Japan. Wikipedia should be consistent and use Emperor Shōwa with disambiguation pages as necessary. There is a lot of comment on ""most common usage"" in English. ""Most common"" is not necessarily ""most correct"". If wikipedia is to be a meaningful reference and encyclopedia, it should promote usage of the ""most correct"" term over what some people may feel is ""most common"". With the automatic re-direct function, there should not be any confusion at all if the article is titled Emperor Shōwa and the commonly used name ""Hirohito"" redirects to it.
" | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
NaconKantari vandal wont not not stop harassing me
NaconKantari keeps reverting my comments on my own talk page, falsely accusing me of removing ""warnings on IP pages"". HE also reverted my comment on Raddragon300's page after i suggested he apply for adminship. NaconKantari felt i was wrong so he used the rollback tool. Please block this mongoloid fraud. " | [
"toxic"
] | [
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
""Rule-based cold-hearted automaton."" Just following orders, eh?" | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
less than one paragraph on the Twelvers, even though it's | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Your message on my talk page
No, no message. I am a member of the Welcoming Committee, hence the welcome. – | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Alright, I've protected it. On VV's version, as it turns out, but only because that was the most recent version. If another, less involved, sysop wants to choose the other version, whatever - I figure I'm perhaps on thin ice protecting at all, but I wanted to stop the edit war. 08:07, 23 Apr 2004 (UTC) | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
Whether this is an appropriate discussion for Wikipedia at all aside, might it be sensible to move this to the Star Trek main page? I believe that there's been some scholarly work examining the Federation as a (slightly idealised) representation of the U.S. Perhaps a summary of that work could be included instead of an argument that essentially in novel ""research"". xx
" | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Confirmed in the United Kingdom
source . 82.23.106.229
Deletion request for the tracking table, see here
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2009 swine flu outbreak/Table
Closed per WP:SNOW
New case in Ohio
There has been a new case detected (and confermed) in ohio. May want to update.
Confirmed cases in the UK
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8020222.stm
Someone needs to update the map and the UK section!
Done. Thank you. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
Citations needed
The paragraph that begins: ""Academic hackers usually work openly and..."" reads like original research to me, as does the paragraph that appears much later beginning ""Computer security hackers are the opposite..."". Anyone want to volunteer to rewrite these to hew more closely to our content policies (notably, by sourcing them?) " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
Royall's page uses ""The Baroness Ashton of Upholland"" because it's about the Leader of the House of Lords and the peerage is used. Here, we are linking to the Commissioner for Trade which does not use the title and she is thusly ""Catherine Ashton"". This is akin to how Mandelson is only linked as ""The Lord Mandelson"" after he gained peerage, though in reverse. She hasn't lost it, but it isn't used when referring to her role in the EU, so we use her birth name. Should she re-enter British politics and become Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change, the link would use her title in peerage. " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
These are construtive changes. You are just a troll. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Stuart Searle
But he has made 3 FA Cup appearances for Basingstoke I think, I was readed that somewhere, I think in BBC. I'll try to find this. BGTopDon's User Page Contributions | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
I'm not seeing where it says that he is a scientist and a theologian. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
" (UTC)
The planes are not built of cardboard or glue and a quote from ""one woman"" is hardly evidence 18:03, 16 February 2007" | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Your message
Hi Adrian. I hope you don't mind, I copied your message to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Cornwall which is the most active talk page for the project - this way more people will see it! | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
Does the lede for evolution mention ""teach the controversy""? No, of course not. Does the lede for Earth mention the Flat-Earth society? No, of course not. Does the lede for sociology mention phrenology? No, of course not. Does the lede for christianity mention that some catholics do not consider protestants to be christian (and vice-versa)? No, of course not. The lede is not for such things. Please stop trying to make it be that way, given your complete misreading and misunderstanding of WP:LEAD. And please don't say that those articles are not relevant to this discussion, for they are. It's called ""consistency"". You will have to explain to all of us why you think anarchocapitalism is so special that it deserves this special treatment that other articles don't have. - " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Russia
Aren't they on the government's side and not part of the coalition. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"::::I don't understand what you are trying to tell me. Having transcripts of a court case online is a ""nice to have"", it isn't mandatory. A court case transcript is a reliable source. What you are arguing can be said of any source, you could just as well apply your concerns to any source which doesn't exist online. The purpose of the court links is to give anyone that so desires sufficient information to go to the court and access the transcripts. Also those court links do show the status of the court cases. WP:RS is not equivalent to ""exists online"". WP:V can be satisfied by providing all the information required to retrieve a case. Just because the court itself doesn't make transcriots available online doesn't mean that a court transcript can't be referenced. That's like saying that if I reference a book I find in a library that isn't online it doesn't satisfy WP:RS or WP:V. That's just plainly wrong. Most books and journals aren't online or are behind a paywall.
" | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
Although I admit Soraab Balkhi is not shy about calling Pashtuns ""tribal"". That might seem racist, but its accurate since the Pashtuns are mostly tribal. " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
What point am I trying to prove, in your imagination? I am correcting poor writing and will continue to do so. The wording of the sentence ""Coldplay's early material was seen as reminiscent..."" is just plain bad writing, because it doesn't say WHO saw it as reminiscent, nor why we should give such credence to this person's opinion. If you want to insert opinions into articles, you have to specifically state WHOSE opinions they are and defend why they're worth pushing so prominently within an article. Take the matter to an admin if you don't believe me. " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Queer Wikipedians
You are creating an article in the main namespace, not a category (:Category:Queer Wikipedians) or an article in the meta namespace like Wikipedia:Queer Wikipedians, where I already moved your text. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
Boing! said Zebedee , you say When working on article content, what individual editors ""know"" is largely irrelevant - it's only what they can reference to reliable sources that counts (see WP:RS). And when there is a disagreement about the reliability of sources, it should be solved by discussion and consensus on the relevant Talk page, not by arguing about which editor ""knows"" best.....Disappointing that my conciliatory response to Sitush in spite of his name calling misses your attention .
Sitush calls me a wind up merchant , on my talk page ,.....which article page is he discussing other than me ?
There are ample talk pages on record where I have discussed content instead of deletions/or edit warring , which specific article or talk page are you referring to where I have not properly discussed reliability of sources with Sitush.
Considering the absence of your mentioning a specific circumstance of incident on a page or talk page your advice is extraneous and erroneous , in fact am surprised as an admin you dident find Sitush name calling comment ""personal accusation"" .Your comment here is is inequitable . " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
What are we to make of Lewis' claim
that ""Geoffrey takes it from the second-century De Deo Socratis of Apuleius""?" | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
Serious question: what about Mr or Mr. for ""Mister""?
" | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Yes, of course. I totally forgot we have those guidelines. Thanks. Perhaps we can get a mini consensus from the regular editors to scrap it - or just do it. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
I'm done! You guys have a good Wiki, okay? Jossi, I will say this now so that you can perhaps do me a favour and have me banned forever. You are a liar through and through. You are a snake. You have no scruples at least not when it comes to defending your Master and I just feel like I need a bath of some kind for even having come in contact with you. How's that? Is that enough to commit Wikisuicide? I can go on if you like. The point is, get me out of this Kafkaesque pit of craziness. Yes, indeed, I admit, Rawat is a big spokesperson for peace .......LOL!!!!!!!!!! He's an alcoholic cult leader is what he is. Still has people line up and kiss his feet.
Okay, that's it. Bye! | [
"toxic",
"insult"
] | [
1,
0,
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Adam Biafore
There is a lot on him in the book [2Pac Lives The Death of Makaveli / The Resurrection of Tupac Amaru (Volume 1)]]. Also I once read something else on him in another book about cults. Why is their no article on him on Wikipedia? | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
Yeah I'm actually a seven-year-old black Australian midget.''''''Holla! " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Sorry I don't seem to have expressed my point well. I'll try again. Being notified of the probation in no way implies that there is anything remarkable about your edits. It's just a record of the fact that, having made a substantive edit on an article under probation, you've been notified of the probation. Speaking for myself, if somebody just makes a wikignome change such as a spelling correction or a minor formatting edit, I don't notify them. All other editors are notified. Check for yourself, I've personally notified over 100 editors in the past seven days. TS | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
is anyone there? HELLO? MOM?????? | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Title Looks Like...
I just realized about how similar the title to this game looks like the legend of zelda one | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
So now Wikipedia (and reading the author/editor's own words first hand for yourself) is/are an unreliable source(s) as well -what source is authentic and reliable ? None, I take it, for the obviously biased media monitors and sesnors with an agenda, I am sure.
Witness in the editing history of the following page(s):
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Kelly_O%27Donnell#Controversy ,
and here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:SummerPhD#Work_in_progress ,
that SummerPhD is a plainly and clearly biased sensor with no regard for undeniable truth or (compellingly conclusive) facts which would otherwise be admissible and uncontrovertibe in courts of law and/or equity, should they be so offered (and yet they may). SummerPhD and his/her editorial co-conspirators have, in effect, undermined the credibility of wikipedia through use of circular nonsenical argument (if one can fairly even call it argument - it's more in the nature of a bi-polar / borderline personalty type rant, as aparent) and unbridaled use of the editors' pen, which power ought to be withdrawn or at least suspended , with public repremand , by officials of Wikipedia , if there are such persons.
If not, the intentional destruction of others' intellectual property rights , given unto the public domain , ought to be actionable under some legal writ , whether sounding in tort or criminal law.
Keep it up SummerPhD and win yourself a heaping helping of litigation , all over the world , starting in Dallas, Texas.
As a result of SummerPhD's sensoring editorial practicies, SummerPhD has interjected him/herself into a growing controversy over what exactly it is that SummerPhD is trying to cover up , and why.
Unethical, self dealing hacks are all you and your little group are. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Against All Odds#2003|Against All Odds (2003)]]}}
|- | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
More of the same: 1) http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/andrewbrown/2009/apr/15/religion-catholicism
2)http://wapedia.mobi/en/Anti-Catholicism_in_the_United_Kingdom
3)http://physiocrat.blogspot.com/2010/04/lewes-bonfire-night.html
4)http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/493717.stm
5)http://www.catholicherald.co.uk/articles/a0000291.shtml
A History Lesson from, The Catholic Knight:
""British anti-Catholicism has a long history going back five centuries and reaching the highest levels of British government. It began in the early 16th century when King Henry VIII failed to receive an annulment from the Vatican and subsequently broke English Christianity away from the pope and declared himself the absolute spiritual ruler of the Church of England. He then proceeded on a campaign to persecute and murder all who opposed his personal claim to the ""English papacy."" Things only went downhill from there. In subsequent generations the throne passed between Catholic and Protestant heirs, each persecuting their political enemies. The final result came under Queen Elizabeth I which settled England as a Protestant country. In the following centuries, England became the leading herald of anti-Catholic propaganda around the world, as the British crown persecuted Irish Catholics and waged war against the Catholic kingdoms of France and Spain.""
""Sadly, the more things change the more they stay the same. The world may have moved into the 21st century, but British politics is still locked in the 16th century. To date Catholics are still forbidden from the British royal family. Government officials still mock the pope and the Church behind closed doors. Leading party officials not only refuse to defend the pope's right of innocence until proven guilty, but actually participate in promoting anti-Catholic presumption. Way to go England! Thanks for reminding the world just how little you've progressed in five centuries. Just brilliant! Jolly good show!"" Malke2010 " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
, a pan-American approach of XX Bolivar, | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Materials
What are they using to contain whatever they're smuggling? Condoms and seran wrap? | [
"toxic"
] | [
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
In this case, the sources to quote would be DSM-III and DSM-IV. I own both of them and can supply quotes. — (Talk) " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Zavrč was pushed from 2nd to 5th league by their owner for some reasons, they did not have a bypass and were not dissolved | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
Fair use rationale for Image:WhiteWedding.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:WhiteWedding.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the ""my contributions"" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting ""Image"" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
Which is why I keep asking you to get WP:Autoreviewer. By the way, why did you change the spelling of Shadowbrook?—Spiff " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
Interjection: There is a grammatical inconsistency between ""originally used"" and ""refers"". Since the past tense is correct, ""referred"" is a better word there. I'd also like to point out that the part about Prof Jones is a bit unclear. What experiment did he do that was different from the P/F work? Did it involve deuterium-saturated metal? If so, then technically there is little significant difference, today ""cold fusion"" is basically the description of a proposed explanation for the apparent appearance of heat in experiments that involve deuterium-saturated metal. Believers, of course, think that the heat is real and the proposal is the correct explanation.
" | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
Well, Well, Well. Where are the anti-soviet nolife squad now?
Biophys - that guy is blocked from all eastern european topics. he said he retried a year ago but edits his own talk-page daily (even though its empty).
you - terminated. I guess spewing lies, insults, engaging in abusive activities + inventing ""sources"" and being pro-Nazi didn't pay off, did it now?
GL in your ban. I guess your anti-soviet liespam crusade fell apart eventually." | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
This is true Bush liberating 35 million Iraqis and Afghanis is just like Hitler oppressing millions of Europeans. Oh, wait, wasn't it an American President who liberated Western Europe? And Eastern Europe, later on? | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
jump guru shows why these editors are making bad edits! they think dbz info is stupid! | [
"toxic"
] | [
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
Ad
I placed the advert tag because of the word ""we"" as it comes up in the article. (And after reading Tivedshambo's post) This makes it def. not NPOV in even a small way and definately an ad even if correct. Please go easy on me this is the first time I have added one of these tags.. but I think from what I have seen this does fit into this category. " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
If you're going to continue making people's lives a misery, I will make your life a living hell unless you stop. Why aren't you dead yet? I hope you are being bullied. | [
"toxic",
"threat"
] | [
1,
0,
0,
0,
1,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Oops
I was moving images to the Commons, and deleting images here that exist on the Commons (in accordance with Talk:Wikimedia Commons), and I made a big mistake. I deleted Image:Buddhabrot-deep.jpg, which doesn't exist on the Commons. (The png version is still there.) I expect my talk page to be flooded with angry messages any minute now. Can you restore it please? I'll be much more careful in the future. – (talk) (sleuth) 18:49, Feb 15, 2005 (UTC) | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
I would agree with your point that there is no official policy, but if you examine articles you will see that this is the general layout and agreed upon syntax... it is very much an unofficial policy but one that it still pertinent here. However, that is aside from the fact you don't actually have any evidence of criticism, Germen, as per mine and dab's comments above and on the mediation page. And, you have also started edit warring again, reverting my edits without any comment. Again, for the purposes of peace I ask you to remove the sections in question and return it to dab's version. (talk|contribs) | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
To threat me
Who the hell are you? Peridon? Why you are threatening me being an estranged person? | [
"toxic"
] | [
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Violation of WP:3RR
I am reporting you for a violation of WP:3RR at user talk:George. 94.2.200.100 | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
I am not a bot, troll, or vandal. No evidence has been provided to prove that I am. In fact, an admin said ""he is doing a good job at keeping his identity hidden."" Maybe this is because I am not a sock. As per my cease and desist notice to Toddst1. I now address this notice to all admins who take unjust action against me without proof or evidence. If my account is not unblocked by Monday 9 am est, I will take the legal action that is needed to address this liable claim. I further will seek financial compensation from all parties involved. 24.52.237.81
" | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
Ok, I don't ""proudly"" use a swear on my page, it's true I do know a shitload of info for my age (I'm not telling you). I was also annoyed how some users, like you for example, is so uptight about the rules, it's like ""Come'on give it a rest already. Finally, just because I use a swear does not make all aussie ""blokes"" complete obnoxious people who swear every minute. And you've got the wrong idea of civility. That's all I have to say. " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Maybe that is the name his mother gave him! | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
""criticism of the league for accepting a Donegal team's application""
what is ment by this? Pov?" | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
everyone in discussion was invited by michaeldsuarez . not everyone who vote but everyone in discuss | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not use it for advertising purposes. I have removed your linkspam. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
Review
Thanks so much! talkcontribs " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
quite simple, I reported you on de-WP as Vandal, because you repeatedly redirect the Talk page of a de-WP project to en-WP, delete the list of people who work in this de-WP project, and so on. the projects are not connected, so redirecting to en-WP and repeating this after being revertet is vandalism Alt-F-Fear (Talk) " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
American Reprographics Company
I'm confused. Why did you revert 30,000 to 3,0000? 02:25, 21 Jan 2004 (UTC) | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Hi there. You sound very, very angry. Did you write the content in question? I appreciate that, like me, you have a love for science and the pursuit of an increasingly accurate understanding of the most fascinating subject of all: life. Rewriting the section to be more accurate and cohesive in its entirety sounds like a great idea. — | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"Why is it that a page that can garner such passionate attitudes, as they concern the treatment and consuming of animals, cannot stick to the subject matter? Surely, even the most ardent supporter of animal rights can see that this is simply supposed to be a list of material facts about an aspect of human behavior that has existed in one form or another since the dawn of time? There are many other places on Wikipedia where they can read and contribute their individual viewpoints on the ethical, moral and practical points of animal consumption. I do not wish to enter into personal attacks, and will not on an individual level, but there seem to be quite a few people who are either too stupid or too self-centered to leave their personal opinions out of an encyclopedia article. Can anyone imagine opening a copy of an Encyclopedia Britannica to the ""Slaughterhouses"" entry only to find a jumbled mess of a few verifiable facts mixed in with opinions and hysterical rants about how terrible are slaughterhouses and meat eaters? Why can't these people understand that this is simply a webpage that is attempting to describe what is a slaughterhouse, what it does, where they operate, how they operate, and what types of animals they process? There would be no opinions stating that slaughterhouses are wonderful, desirable places that exist for the pleasure of some sadistic monsters who kill simply for the pleasure of it. Likewise, there will not be any sections condemning slaughterhouses and all people who either work there or utilize the products that are produced in such a place. This article, once completed satisfactorily, will simply be a repository of verifiable facts about slaughterhouses, their genesis, their necessity (as it stands right now in our modern world), and their operating procedures. Yes, there will be facts about the historical conditions, including, I am sure, mention of Upton Sinclair's ""The Jungle."" Also, there will most likely be a small section that notes these vegetarians' and vegans' attitudes and activities concerning slaughterhouses. In this aforementioned small section, I can imagine that there will be external links leading to Wikipedia pages that support these vegetarians | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
' and vegans' points of view. Now, what is wrong with that? A place for everything, and everything in its place? Oh, and if you are still confused about what is a fact and what is an opinion, an ""opinion"" is explained in detail on a (what else?) Wikipedia page residing here: ""en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opinion,"" and it says something like this, for starters: ""1. An opinion is a subjective statement or thought about an issue or topic, and is the result of emotion or interpretation of facts..."" NOW do you see the difference? Please say, ""Yes!"" so that we may move on to more productive pursuits. I have to admit that all of the extremely emotional opinions and diatribes are exhausting me, so CUT IT OUT! Please? John L. Hunter AceHall " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
See . Possibly you may find this document (RG59-793.94/11631) in the National Archives and Records Administration. Western media does not cover everything. MtBell | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Can you please remove all of the blank space on this graph by re-uploading it because it is not only unsightly but its now very un-user friendly for those of us that want to see it properly. Besides we don't know if there will be a snap election or not (unlikely I know but we don't have and are not allowed to pretend we have a crystal ball are we). I can understand you not wanting to re-upload it now because, it will need to be updated in May as agreed as per it's talk page, so if you want to wait till after the local elections by all means do -) Cheers mate 130.88.114.46 | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
So, what does anyone think about including such a paragraph/section? | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Creation Science
This article could use some more eyes. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
Take you meds. Talk " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
OK sorry thanks for fixing that. They are cited in the NBD text so will change to that ref. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
Shit, it was too. Sorry about that. Approval message incoming. '''''' " | [
"toxic",
"profane"
] | [
1,
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Link titleMedia:Example.oggInsert non-formatted text hereMedia:Example.ogg
Headline text
link titleItalic textBold text | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Reworked this one and a few others. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Towns and Villages in Ark-La-Tex]] Cities, boroughs and towns in the Republic of Ireland Cities, boroughs, and townships along the Susquehanna River Cities, towns and villages in Alborz Province Cities, towns and villages in Ardabil Province Cities, towns and villages in Bhutan Cities, towns and villages in Bushehr Province Cities, towns and villages in Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari Province Cities, towns and villages in Cyprus Cities, towns and villages in Dutch Limburg Cities, towns and villages in East Azerbaijan Province Cities, towns and villages in East Timor Cities, towns and villages in Fars Province Cities, towns and villages in Flevoland Cities, towns and villages in Friesland Cities, towns and villages in Gelderland Cities, towns and villages in Gilan Province Cities, towns and villages in Golestan Province Cities, towns and villages in Groningen Cities, towns and villages in Hamadan Province Cities, towns and villages in Hormozgan Province Cities, towns and villages in Ilam Province Cities, towns and villages in Isfahan Province Cities, towns and villages in Kerman Province Cities, towns and villages in Kermanshah Province Cities, towns and villages in Khuzestan Province Cities, towns and villages in Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad Province Cities, towns and villages in Kurdistan Province Cities, towns and villages in Lorestan Province Cities, towns and villages in Markazi Province Cities, towns and villages in Mazandaran Province Cities, towns and villages in North Brabant Cities, towns and villages in North Holland Cities, towns and villages in North Khorasan Province Cities, towns and villages in Overijssel Cities, towns and villages in Qazvin Province Cities, towns and villages in Qom Province Cities, towns and villages in Razavi Khorasan Province Cities, towns and villages in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Cities, towns and villages in Samoa | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Cities, towns and villages in Semnan Province Cities, towns and villages in Sistan and Baluchestan Province Cities, towns and villages in South Holland Cities, towns and villages in South Khorasan Province Cities, towns and villages in Tehran Province Cities, towns and villages in Turkmenistan Cities, towns and villages in Utrecht Cities, towns and villages in Vojvodina Cities, towns and villages in West Azerbaijan Province Cities, towns and villages in Yazd Province Cities, towns and villages in Zanjan Province Cities, towns and villages in Zeeland Cities, towns and villages in the Maldives Cities, towns and villages in the Solomon Islands Cities, towns, and villages in Békés county Cities, towns, and villages in Louisiana | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
Actually it should be directing you to MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist— AbsentBe my Valentine " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Refusal to discuss. Bad faith. WP:FAITH. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
", 18 December 2015 (UTC)
WP:DUE yes. It has a place under this protocol for sure. My hunch in starting the thread was right afterall. I guess the rest is kinda humerous, the arguing and such. Its a pity though its not smoother. lets talk 06:29" | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
""only explaining what NARTH claims"" no, it provides a soft endorsement. Wikipedia is for the benefit of readers, not for the progaganda interests of orgs.
The claim that all SSA treated by the org is ""unwanted"" is a WP:REDFLAG claim.
See MOS:QUOTE - it is always wrong to use phrases like ""The site is considered ""sacred"" by the religion's scriptures"" because it interpolates an opinion - also WP:ATTRIBUTEPOV.
""no reason the lead shouldn't explain what NARTH's claims are"" - WP:FRINGE and WP:REDFLAG applies - if they are wrong they need analysis in the body, not presentation as soft endorsement in the lead. " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Hello, could you please unprotect that page? I would like to create an article there. Thank you | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
REDIRECT Talk:Stereotypes of East Asians in the United States | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Hi Vivvt, in my opinion, it really could use a peer review. The grammar isn't brilliant at all and needs quite a bit of work. The idea and content of the list is great, it just needs to be brought up to our standards before you nominate it at FLC. Cheers, | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Book
This book contains some useful information that could be used to improve the article. (talk•contribs) | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
After Arkansas Preservation redesigned their web site a few weeks ago, there are a number of issues with the NRHP part of the site. I have found at least two instances of listings that are missing from search results, and numerous PDFs of listings are also missing. If you find what seem to be missing entries, you can try to find them the NRIS mirror run by Elkman, which has all listings up to about April 2010 (i.e. it has no listings or delistings after then). If they show up in Elkman but not on the Arkansas Preservation site, contact them (info@arkansaspreservation.com), they're pretty good about responding. On the old web site, I would report errors or omissions that would be fixed within a business day. Sometimes the omission from their site is caused by an imminent delisting. For bridges, you can also see if Bridgehunter has images or other information (like better lat/lon, which these two listings need).
In this case, listings for ""Cove Creek Bridge"" and ""Cove Creek Tributary Bridge"" both show up in Elkman (Tributary=95000644, Creek=95000645), and are given separate resource identifiers (in the ""Other Names"" field in Elkman: Tributary=LO0051, Creek=LO0050). Unfortunately, Logan County appears to be one of the counties whose nomination forms are not currently available on the web site, but they can send copies by email. Bridgehunter has images of both bridges (look nearly identical), provided by the Arkansas Highway Dept. ''''piano " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Men's ranking Figure: While nice to look at, misses key time between 2010 Olympics and 2010 World Championships
That's all there is to it in the title. IIHF lists a 2010 post-olympics ranking, and 2010 ranking (presumably post-WC). To exclude this period is incorrect, as it is a time where Canada was ranked 1st overall, Russia 2nd. The same issue will happen this year as rankings will change twice (after Olympics and again after WC).70.73.141.146 | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
IM GONNA STICK A SHISHKANIGGER IN YOUR YAWAY! | [
"toxic",
"profane",
"insult"
] | [
1,
1,
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
)
Doors are great but they are even better when they are equipped with a deadbolt and several locks. Lock intruders out, and potential perpetrators in! 18:33, 2 November 2006 (UTC | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
Yup, they all worked. If one failed for any reason (page protected, in existent username, blocked user, etc.) it would have told you in this message. - EdoDodo talk " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
Redirect
Pretty sure Hypomesus japonicus shouldn't link to this article, Spirinchus lanceolatus is not the same species. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
it's not fair ! part 2
RevRagnarok said it was an ""unconstructive edit"" and also deleted my other edit on the page concerning Willie Nelson!" | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
BTW, Judaispriest's final comment that got him reported included this: ""And I personally know LedRush. He's a legendary surfer. All he has is cool buzz, some tasty waves, and he's fine...."" Not that it matters now, but it adds to the disgusting atmosphere you two caused. NOW I'm done. " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
I have no idea what the origin of the toast thing is, but there is always some 4chan/Twitter/social media thing being organized to vandalize some article or another: video games, YouTube personalities, sports figures, sports teams, etc. | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
I've given you ample opportunity to discuss the edits, but no, you've refused, instead just reverting and reverting and offering zero sources or even anything remotely resembling a sufficient explanation. So quit making highly disruptive and totally unsourced edits, as you have been warned on more than one occasion. The Brand Extension is an actual thing that happened and existed for a decade and was factually relevant to WWE television; vague ""eras"" that have no actual start and end point are based on about words uttered on television on about five occasions. Nice insults pal, did you get them off a Penguin wrapper? " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
.
If one did leave out carbon atoms then that would not be correct. Example, what would methamphetamine be if you left out a carbon atom?
What are left out are hydrogen atoms and they should be, since it has been previously pointed out, they would unduly clutter the diagram and are unnescesary as being implyed anyway | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
"
A reference such as:
""Visa Information"". IATA. Retrieved 27 June 2014.
... is practically useless. If and when the link goes dead, the reader who tries to verify this will stumble upon really simple issues: so the publisher was IATA, but what is ""Visa Information"" - a single web page about all visa information, a web page about some specific visa information, ...? When was the information originally published? Can it be found in some old IATA publication as opposed to a web site? Etc etc. That's why a mass change from truly bare links to this format - while clearly well-intentioned - is still essentially useless as a solution to the bare link problem.
, I replied to you on the article talk page. Useless or not, it's NOT a bare link per WP:BAREURLS with which you keep tagging the article. But as I've said if tagging the article with a wrong tag gives you joy then I won't interfere, be joyous my friend. I've invested a lot of time into that article, and it would be nice if you've found something you don't like to actually try and fix it instead of adding those maintenance templates, but I guess we are not all here on the same mission. Some are here apparently just to stubbornly diminish work of others. Even if proven wrong. " | [] | [
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |